Archive policy for the Cornell Computer Science Department
On December 1, 2004, the Cornell Computer Science Faculty by consensus adopted
the following policy, which was proposed by Bill Arms,
Joe Halpern and Steve Vavasis.
All papers emanating
from the department will be saved in a publicly accessible archive like
This document will attempt to explain the rationale and implementation
of the policy.
A crisis has been evolving in the past few years in the realm of
scholarly publishing because commercial journals have raised their
prices substantially without a proportional benefit to the community
of authors or readers. For example, the EMPS (Engineering, Math and
Physical Sciences) library at Cornell has seen a 9% subscription
increase in just the past year. The worst offender seems to be
Elsevier, which publishes many CS journals.
A second looming concern with scholarly publishing is that commercial
publishers are using pricing policies to push libraries into switching
to all-electronic subscription. All-electronic subscription gives the
commercial publisher unprecedented control over who can read articles
and for what purposes those articles are used. Furthermore, an electronic
subscription means that the publisher expands its role to become also
the archivist of the material. There is no reason to believe
that a company like Elsevier is qualified to usurp the role
traditionally filled by libraries as the archivist of scholarly work
over a period of decades or centuries.
For more information about the problems faced by university libraries,
please visit the home page
of the SPARC project of the Association of
An obvious solution to these problems is for the academic community as
a whole to create its own archive under the control of scholars rather
than a corporate board of directors. This is the goal behind
arxiv.org. We believe that all academics ought to include their
publications in this kind of archive. Therefore, we are establishing
this as a departmental policy. We would like to establish it as a
policy for the whole world, but we have to start somewhere!
Naturally, a member of the department could easily follow this policy
on his or her own initiative without the existence of a departmentwide
policy. Indeed, several of us already archive our papers as a matter
of course because archiving brings several benefits to the author
including enhanced visibility of the result and proof of precedence of
discovery. But we believe there are three reasons why it is useful to
make archiving an official policy of the department.
By making it a policy, we are making a public statement in favor of
There is clearly a snowball effect at work: the more computer
scientists who archive, the more useful the archive becomes, and
hence more people will archive, etc.
If archiving becomes a policy, then the University Library, which
has considerable expertise in the copyright issues involved, can
help us to make sure that we protect our right to archive and
distribute our materials when we sign journal copyright transfer
What is archiving?
Archiving means storing and managing a document in a way that will ensure its
availability over a long period of time, e.g., decades or centuries.
University libraries are usually considered archival repositories.
In contrast, personal home-pages are generally not considered
What makes archiving special?
In the past, archiving has meant that the document should be printed
with long-lasting inks on long-lasting papers and stored in a stable
environment (away from direct sunlight, high humidity, etc.) In addition,
archiving also implies good cataloging mechanisms to make sure
documents can be found when they are sought.
internet era, archiving means that documents should be stored in a stable
and well-backed up medium. It also means that a group of archivists
must over the years take responsibility for updating digital documents
in the case that encoding standards (such as
PDF) and retrieval protocols
(such as http) evolve.
Arxiv.org is a web-based archival repository for scientific documents.
Currently, it has three subject areas: physics, mathematics and computer
science. It is supported by the Cornell University library and contains
hundreds of thousands of papers from around the world. It is run by
a self-perpetuating committee of academics. It was founded by Paul
Ginsparg while he was at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Paul is currently
a Professor of Physics and of Computing and Information Science at
Why is arxiv.org considered archival?
First, arxiv.org has a policy that once a paper is submitted, it cannot
be removed. (But it can be updated, and errata can be published, etc.)
This is similar in spirit to the idea that a paper, once published in
a journal, can never be "depublished".
Second, arxiv.org has implemented policies to try to improve the chances
that a paper archived today will still be accessible in 100 years.
For example, arxiv.org requests that papers written in Latex be submitted
in their Latex form (rather than in postscript or PDF) because Latex is
a fairly stable, human-readable and well-documented representation of
documents. Furthermore, Latex documents contain more information
than the PDF output from Latex, so they can be catalogued more reliably.
Third, arxiv.org will remain
the responsibility of the Cornell University Library. As one of its
primary mandates from the University, the Library is accountable for
ensuring that designated information in all formats, including the content
of the arxiv, is maintained and accessible for the long term.
Why should I want to submit my paper to arxiv.org?
Please see the rationale section of this
document for some reasons why archiving your paper is beneficial
to your career.
But what if I want to keep my Latex source confidential?
There are several answers to this question.
When you submit your Latex paper, you can check a box indicating
that the Latex should not be distributed. In addition, if your
paper has comments in it that you would prefer to keep confidential,
you can run a perl script (available on the arxiv website) that strips
comments prior to submission.
But many journals, e.g., ACM and SIAM, think that PDF is good enough.
Really, why can't arxiv.org just use PDF?
The maintainers of arxiv.org have found incompatibilities in
versions of PDF
that may render your document unreadable by scholars over
a very long period of time. There is currently a proposal for an
archival version of pdf called
If this proposal becomes reality, then arxiv.org will
probably allow PDF/A submission.
What if my document is in Word?
In this case, arxiv allows you to submit the PDF version of your document.
Doesn't archiving violate a journal's copyright policy?
First, note that you can alter copyright transfer agreements to preserve
more rights for yourself. Naturally, a journal might reject the paper
if it disagrees with your alterations to the agreement, but we
have heard that many people have successfully altered these
agreements without adverse consequences.
Later, we will post some possible alterations that people have
successfully used on copyright transfer agreements.
Assuming you don't alter the agreement,
you are subject to the terms of it.
Here are the policies of some of the larger CS
What about embargo policies?
Some journals have embargo policies stating that a result may not be
disclosed in any form prior to journal submission. Some very
well known journals like Science have a firm embargo policy.
An example of a CS publication with
an embargo policy is SIGGRAPH proceedings. SIGGRAPH uses a blind reviewing
system (i.e., paper reviewers are not told the names of the authors),
and any web-distribution of a paper would undermine the possibility
that it could be blindly reviewed.
We are currently investigating specifically whether there is a
workaround for SIGGRAPH. In the case of Cornell University employees,
the matter appears to be moot since, as mentioned above, ACM gives
authors permission to post papers after acceptance on their employers'
Naturally, the journal's policy overrides this
policy, i.e., we are not suggesting that anyone should violate
a journal's policy in order to follow this one.
On the other hand, if you are a believer in archiving and regularly
submit papers to journals and conferences
with embargo policies, then
you can use this document as an argument to convince the journal
to loosen its embargo policies.
Does arxiv.org undermine the traditional refereeing process? In other
words, what will happen if
everyone starts submitting papers to arxiv.org and they
cease submitting them to refereed journals?
This is an interesting question that will need to be periodically
revisited. The experience so far in physics (which has the largest
subject area of arxiv.org) is that the refereeing process has not
been abandoned, i.e., the arxiv.org papers usually end up in refereed
journals as well.
What if I simply don't want to archive my papers?
Compliance with this new policy of archiving papers
is entirely voluntary. On the other hand,
if you choose to ignore the policy, give some
consideration to the reasons for this choice. If there are
technical reasons not already covered by this FAQ, please bring them
to the attention of an arxiv.org board members, for example, Joe
I received helpful comments on this writeup from Bill Arms, Joe
Halpern and Ross Atkinson.
Stephen A. Vavasis, Department of Computer Science, 4130 Upson Hall,
Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, email@example.com.
Last update: April 12, 2005.