Online syllabus: http://www.cs.cornell.edu/people/sengers/Teaching/sts634/index.php
Topic
"Those who mistrust the machine and those who glorify it show the same incapacity to utilize it. Machine work and mass production offer unheard-of possibilities for creation, and those who are able to place these possibilities at the service of a daring imagination will be my creators of tomorrow." --- Guy Debord
This seminar explores building information technology as a form of critical inquiry. As computer science and human-computer interaction come into contact with traditionally nontechnical disciplines such as art, design, and cultural studies, new tensions and opportunities arise.
What will this mean for technical research? How do humanistic and artistic insights affect traditional technical methodologies and alter the questions that are being asked? What new technologies are being developed, and how do they differ from the results of purely technical research?
We will answer these questions by looking at research projects in social, tangible, and ubiquitous computing. We will compare traditional technical research with research based on interdisciplinary techniques such as tactical media, art as research, critical design, conceptual design, and innovative user-centered design.
Students from all fields are welcome. The course provides opportunities to contribute from a variety of disciplines; its baseline assumption is some ability to read technical papers as well as basic comfort with the humanities at an undergraduate level.
You can download the syllabus in print-friendly format.
Texts
You will need to order from your favorite vendor (for example, the Campus Store) the following books:
- Paul Dourish. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.
- Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Basel, Switzerland: August / Birkhaeuser, 2001.
- William Gaver, Ben Hooker, and Anthony Dunne. The Presence Project. London: Royal College of Art, 2001.
- Malcolm McCullough. Digital Ground: Architecture, Pervasive Computing, and Environmental Knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.
- Nato Thompson and Gregory Sholette, eds. The Interventionists: Users' Manual for the Creative Disruption of Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.
All other readings will be made available in class or on-line. Please note that many of the readings that are available on-line are only available if you access the links from within Cornell networks.
Schedule
In order to support a broad set of student interests and communication among them, the readings are organized according to a Chinese Menu system. Each week, there are a set of core readings that are required for all. In addition, students do readings from either Selection A (usually more technical/HCI-focused readings) or Selection B (usually more conceptual/arts-oriented readings). Students must sign up for either Selection A or Selection B by Thursday of the week before (those who have not signed up by then will be assigned a selection at the whim of the instructor). In Thursday's class, the readers of each selection will have 10 minutes to discuss the selection amongst themselves and then present the highlights of these articles to the other students. You may not sign up for the same selection all semester; i.e., you must sign up for Selection A at least once and for Selection B at least once.
Alterations to this schedule may be made over the
course of the semester in response to student feedback
and interests.
Topic |
Readings |
Classes |
Introduction |
Introduction to course |
Core Readings |
|
Selection A |
|
Selection B |
|
Related Readings |
|
|
|
Aug 24 Read and discuss Weiser's Coming Age of Calm Technology
|
What is a critical technical practice? |
|
Aug 29 What is a critical technical practice?
|
Aug 31 Unpack the relationship of arts, critique, and HCI
|
Ubiquitous/Pervasive Computing |
Introduction to Ubicomp |
|
Sep 5 The world of ubiquitous devices
|
Sep 7 Unpacking technical and social issues with ubicomp
|
Viewing Ubicomp Through Architecture |
|
Sep 12 Analyzing Digital Ground
|
Sep 14 What does an influence from architecture look like in ubicomp?
|
Critical Design |
Core Readings |
Dunne and Raby: Design Noir
|
Selection A |
Gaver and Martin: Alternatives
|
Selection B |
Wodiczko: Interrogative Design
|
Related Readings |
Paulos and Beckmann: Sashay
|
|
Sep 19 Using design to critique design
|
Sep 21 Building on critical design
|
Critically- Informed Design in HCI |
|
Sep 26 Bringing critical design into HCI
|
Sep 28 Analyzing the uptake of critical design in HCI
Paper proposal workshop
Homework: Short paper proposals due.
|
Interlude: Thinking About Critical Intervention |
Mapping Critical Intervention |
|
Oct 3 Cataloguing strategies of intervention
Homework: Select any one project from The Interventionists to research in more detail. Come to class prepared to describe in about 5 minutes the project and the critical strategy it pursues.
|
Oct 5 Exploring models for intervention
|
Embodied Interaction |
Let's Get Physical |
|
|
Oct 12 What changes when we put our bodies at the center?
|
Social Computing |
|
Oct 17 Defining social computing
Homework: Short papers due
|
Oct 19 Thinking about desgining for social contexts
Final projects brainstorming
|
Embodied Interaction |
|
Oct 24 Putting it together: social + tangible = embodied interaction
|
Oct 26 How embodied interaction might change our ideas of computing
Final projects workshop
Homework: Filled-in final project idea forms
|
Co-Interpreting Experience |
Participatory Design as Critical Intervention |
|
Oct 31 The critical potential of participatory design
|
Nov 2 What does PD look like today?
Homework: Written proposals for final project
|
Affective Presence |
|
Nov 7 What is affective presence?
|
Nov 9 Dealing with the ineffability of affect
|
Co-Interpreting Experience |
|
Nov 14 Designing for open interpretation
|
Nov 16 (How) does it make sense to design for appropriation, given that people appropriate anyway?
Final projects workshop
|
Conclusion |
Project Workshop |
Core Readings |
|
Selection A |
|
Selection B |
|
Related Readings |
|
|
Nov 21
Homework: Together with your project team, prepare an oral presentation of your project to explain your thinking and results so far to the class.
|
|
Project Workshop / Wrap-up |
|
Nov 28 Oral presentations
|
Nov 30 Oral presentations / Where to from here?
|
Dec 11: Final Projects Due |
Dec 15: End-of-semester Party (Optional) |
Assignments
You will do weekly one-page reading
responses, which are due on our wiki by Monday at midnight.
These responses have two components:
- One-paragraph description of one of the week's readings, that summarizes the argument made and the evidence being used in support of that argument.
- Ca. one-paragraph response to the reading.
You may choose the form of your response; some examples are:
- Discussion of an issue or problem raised by that
reading that you find interesting.
- A link to a related news article or short piece from outside of class.
- A comment on or contribution to someone else's reading response.
Reading responses are graded on a pass/fail basis. During the
course of the semester, you may skip 2 of them without penalty.
You will write two papers for this class. The first will be
10 pages, on a topic you choose related to the course content.
The second will be a long paper on a group project you develop
with teammates from the course. Each group project will
involve the design, implementation, and evaluation of some
technology as a form of critical technical practice.
Alterations to these assignments are always possible
upon approval of the instructor.
Grading formula:
- Weekly Responses: 10%
- Short Paper: 25%
- Long Paper: 45%
- Oral presentation: 5%
- Class and on-line discussion: 15%
Grading is not just a matter of numbers, but also of
judgment. The instructor reserves the right to adjust
grades by up to half a letter grade based on knowledge
of your performance not summed up in this tidy formula.