Instructor: Prof. Hakim Weatherspoon
Tue/Thur 1:00-2:00pm, 4105C Upson Hall, or by appointment)
Part-Time TAs: Erluo Li and Qin Jia
(Office hours: TBD)
Class Admin: Molly Trufant
(4115 Upson Hall)
Class Meetings: Attendance is required.
407 Phillips Hall
Aug28: Welcome to CS 6410!
First session will be tomorrow, Thursday, August 29th, in room 407 Phillips Hall.
This is a graduate-level reading course that covers classic and recent
papers in operating systems and distributed systems. Students will:
- learn about current research perspectives on computer systems, including
advanced systems abstractions, principles, and artifacts that have had lasting value,
- understand attributes of systems research that is likely to have impact,
- become comfortable navigating the literature in this field,
- gain experience in thinking critically and analytically about systems research, and
- acquire the background needed to work on research problems currently under study at Cornell and elsewhere.
CS6410 is thus aimed primarily at the research community. In contrast,
CS5412 (Cloud Computing) offers a more practical, hands-on perspective on the
same kinds of material. MEng students are therefore encouraged to take
CS5412 and not CS6410, and PhD students (or undergraduates who plan to pursue a
PhD) are encouraged to take CS6410. Notice that we did not say "computer
science" students: CS6410 often includes PhD students from ECE, CAM, IS and
other fields. We also often have undergraduates in the class (typically,
seniors who are thinking of pursuing a PhD). And finally, MEng students
aren't turned away. We simply require that they have backgrounds as strong
as those of the PhD students and that they participate in identical ways.
Attendees are expected to have mastered the material in CS 3410 (CS 314) or CS 3420 (ECE 3140), and also CS 4410
(CS 414). If you didn't enjoy CS 4410, you won't have fun in CS
Cornell PhD students with appropriate background may enroll
without special approvals. Undergraduates and MEng students are required
to obtain Professor Weatherspoon's explicit permission before enrolling. Please
meet with Professor Weatherspoon either prior to the first day of classes, or after
class on the first day, to discuss your level of preparation and goals.
Note: Auditors in CS 6410 are not expected to submit a term project.
But auditors are expected to lead one or more class sessions, just
like the students who are enrolled in the course for credit.
- Presentations: Each student is expected to prepare at least one presentation and lead a discussion one or more times during the semester (see below). A presentation/discussion will be of papers drawn from the reading list of the course.
- Participation: All students are expected to participate in class by asking questions of the speakers and participating in the follow-up discussion on the assigned readings.
Every student is expected to attend every class.
- Readings: All students are required to read papers in advance of the class and submit a review via Course Management System (CMS). Paper reviews succinctly discuss the paper's strengths, weaknesses, and potential improvements or areas of future research (See how to prepare a review below).
- Project: The project in CS 6410 is an open-ended research project, done in groups of one or two. The project requires an initial proposal, a midterm survey paper, a final report (both written and presented), and reviews of others' projects. More information can be found on the Project page.
- 40% class presentations, written reviews, in-class participation.
- 20% Class Presentations. This grade will be based on both the number and quality of presentations you give. Quantity is not a substitute for quality, but failing to do your fair-share of the presentations will impact your grade.
- 10% Written reviews
- 10% Participation in class discussion.
- 50% independent projects.
- 5% Peer reviews.
- 5% Initial project proposal.
- 15% Midterm survey.
- 25% Final project (written report and demo).
- 5% Lab Assignments
- 5% Subjective factors, including regular in-class quizes based on required readings.
You may discuss the questions for each discussion paper with other
students, but you may not look at other student's answers. You must
write your answer yourself.
To draw a very clear line, you may use any idea from any other
person or group in the class or out, provided you clearly state what
you have borrowed and from whom. If you do not provide a
citation---that is, you turn other people's work in as your own---that is
cheating. Anything else is fair game. Of course, we will be grading
you on the ideas you have added, but you should always borrow as much
as you can as a starting point as there is no point in reinventing
An online syllabus with links to all the papers is
Click here and here to find out how to write a review.
Writing Paper Reviews
Paper reviews should be short, concise, and most importantly, critical.
They should include:
- Short paragraph (3-4 sentences) summarizing the paper and discussing any of the following suggest points:
- What do you feel the main contribution of this paper is?
- What did you find interesting about this work?
- What's the essential principle that the paper exploits?
- Two or three major strength of the paper (typically one sentence for each point)
- Two or three weakness of the paper (typically one sentence each point)
- One question or future work direction you think should be followed (optional)
Additionally, we will usually post a question on CMS more than 48 hours before class. The question should be answered in the review as well.
In all, a review is typically 8 to 12 sentences over two to three paragraphs.
You would need to write an additional couple of sentences if there is a question to answer.
How to Prepare and Lead a Presentation
- [Sept 4] Class participants should be prepared to select the first round of topics they will lead.
- [At least 5 class meetings (=2 weeks + 1 meeting) before the scheduled date for your presentation] Meet with the instructor to agree on what ideas to focus on and what papers to cover.
- [At least 3 class meetings (=1 week + 1 meeting) before the scheduled date for your presentation] Meet with the instructor to go over a draft of your presentation. Prior to that meeting, submit either a set of written (typeset) lecture notes if you are giving a "chalk talk" or a printed copy of slides if you are giving a powerpoint presentation.
- [At least 2 class meetings before the scheduled date for your presentation] Meet with the instructor
- for a final review / dry-run of your presentation, and
- to decide the set of papers that constitute the assigned reading
Don't expect you'll be able to schedule the above meetings at the last minute. Schedules fill up, and the instructor is not infrequently away from Ithaca. Email the instructor a week or so in advance of when you'll want to have the above meetings.
Questions or comments? email Prof. Hakim Weatherspoon
Policy on academic integrity
Last modified: Mon Sep 2 08:14:56 EDT 2013