CS 1110: Introduction to Computing Using Python
Times & Places
Notes on Python Programming Style
A goal of CS 1110 is for you to learn to write programs that are not only correct but also understandable. A good, clear, principled writing style is as important in programming as it is in writing prose: not only does it make your work more readable to others, but it makes your own thinking more clear to you!
There are, of course, different styles that accomplish the same goal. What's written below are guidelines that have served many CS 1110 students and instructors very well over the years, because of the principles that they embody. But be aware the style of some instructors or staff may vary from semester to semester.
These guidelines should help you toward the goal of writing clear and correect programs. We ask that you follow these guidelines when writing programs in this course. They will give you a good basis for developing a style of your own as you become a more experienced programmer.
This handout includes guidelines for Python constructs that will be covered later in the semester. Skim these sections now and read them more carefully later when the topics are discussed.
Your computer program should be readable, because if it is not readable, the chances of it being correct are slim. Moreover, if your program is unreadable, it will be difficult and time-consuming to find and correct the errors in it. Therefore,
The major reason for using a disciplined style of programming is that it will save you time whenever you have to read your program or debug it.
Your program should be readable by others, not just you. Consider a program you will write in this course. A grader who has trouble understanding it is not likely to give you good a grade. The more understandable, the simpler your program appears to a grader, the better the grade they will be willing to give you.
Outside this course, making programs readable by others becomes even more important. Most programs live a long time and require "maintenance"; changes to adapt to new and different requirements, upgrades in other software, new hardware, etc. Further, the author of the program is quite likely not going to be around when the maintenance is required; someone else must read the program and understand it enough to update it successfully.
Even the programs you write for yourself should be readable; if not, four weeks after finishing it you will not remember it enough to make changes simply.
Thus, simply for your own sake and for the sake of others, it makes sense to develop programming habits that lend themselves to writing readable, understandable, and correct, programs.
Part of these habits concern simple, syntactical measures like indenting program parts properly and using a few conventions for names of variables, methods, etc. The more important part concerns recording enough information in comments for the reader to understand how a program is designed and why.
A computer program is the result many design decisions. These decisions — why this variable was introduced, what that function does, etc. — are often not reflected in the final Python code, which consists of low-level, detailed declarations and statements. However, the higher-level design must be understood if a programmer is to modify the program successfully. Trying to understand decisions that are not recorded in comments in the code is tedious, error-prone, and aggravating --but all too common.
So, it will be to your advantage to instill in yourself some disciplined programming habits, right from the beginning, such as the following:
Preparing all the comments after the program is finished is bad for three reasons:
You will find that writing good comments as you write a program will help you clarify your ideas and write better, correct code sooner. If you can write down clearly what your program is doing you are more likely to have a good understanding of the problem and your program is more likely to be correct. Time spent on careful thinking and writing is more than repaid in time saved during testing and debugging.
Return to Table of Contents
Many people do not think that Python requires a style guide because — unlike other languages — Python programs have to be properly formatted and indented in order to run. However, even so, there are many problems that proper formatting will keep from happening.
In general, Python will allow you to indent with either tabs or spaces. However, beginning programmers should always indent with spaces. This is what your editor, Komodo Edit, does; it is standard practice in most code editors. And whatever you do, you should absolutely never mix tabs and spaces. Doing so will cause your program to crash.
You should always use 4 spaces for each indentation level.
You should strive for a maximum of 79 characters per line.
This convention is a historical artifact of the fact that older computers could only show 80 characters per line on the command prompt. This convention has persisted as people have become accustomed to this length, and it is now considered a "natural length" for a single line of code.
While most code editors will wrap the text for you if you exceed this character limit, text wrapping occurs in inconvenient places and can be difficult to read. To make the code easier to read, it would be better for you to break up the lines yourself.
In order to break up a line of code you need to put expressions in parentheses. You can then break up the code by putting line breaks inside of the parentheses. The following is acceptable Python code:
When using parentheses to break up code across multiple lines, it is standard practice to indent the lines so that they start just after the position of the initial parenthesis. This is shown in the example above.
Because Python is whitespace significant, blanks lines should be used sparingly and to give the most emphasis to code divisions. The following two important guidelines should be observered:
In addition, you may use blank lines to separate logical sections of code within a function or method, but this should be done sparingly.
Imports should usually be on separate lines. The following
is preferable to
However, it is okay to use commas when importing multiple items from a single module. The following is acceptable:
The from keyword should be limited to imports that are used heavily within the current module, and which are guaranteed to cause no collisions with the active namespace.
Return to Table of Contents
Good naming conventions can help you and any reader of a program understand the program easily; bad naming conventions or no naming conventions can lead to confusion and misunderstanding. Some people advocate using very long names that define what the named entity (a method, field, local variable, etc.) represents. However, in general, this is not feasible. A good definition for an entity may require three lines of explanation or more ---how can you have such a long name? On the other hand, extremely short names --one or two characters long-- don't help at all. Thus, some in-between measures have to be adopted. There are contexts where a short name is best and contexts where a longer name is best.
Remember, a name can rarely be used to give a complete, precise definition of the entity it names, and a complete definition should always be given where the entity is defined.
Unlike other programming languages, the naming conventions for Python are not quite finalized. In any Python module, you might see the following mix of conventions:
In order to maintain maximum clarity, our overriding style principle is as follows:
We use underscores for non-object oriented features (functions and global variables), but we use CamelCase for object oriented features.
Example: draw_oval, show_window, length, interest
A function that is a command to do something should be given by a verb phrase that gives some indication of what the method does (But this name should never be used as an excuse to not comment the method!). This primarily includes procedures, though it could be true for fruitful functions as well.
On the other hand, a method that simply returns a value (e.g. a fruitful function with no side effects should be a noun phrase that describes the value. Obviously, determining which case applies to a particular function can be a matter of taste.
Functions which are not methods in a class should use either lowercase or lowercase with underscores (when the function name is a compound word).
Examples: x, y
The precise meaning of a parameter, and any restrictions on it, should be given in the comment of the heading of the method. Therefore, particularly if the method is fairly short, it is wise to give parameters short names, and avoid compound words. The names should be lower case. If you absolutely must use a compound word for a parameter, use underscores for a function and CamelCase (with first letter lower case) for methods.
For a more detailed example, consider the two method headings given below. The first is preferable because it is shorter and easier to understand. Moreover, the body of the method of the first method will also be shorter and far easier to understand and manipulate.
draw_oval(x, y, w, h): """Draw an ellipse that fits within the rectangle given. The upper left corner of the rectange is at position (x,y), its width is w, and its height is h. Use the current color to draw the ellipse."""
draw_oval(x_coordinate, y_coordinate, width, height): """Draw an ellipse that fits within the rectangle given. The upper left corner of the rectange is at position (x_coordinate,y_coordinate), its width is width, and its height is height. Use the current color to draw the ellipse."""
A parameter used as a flag should be named for what the flag represents, like no_more_pizza, rather than simply flag. In addition, you should avoid generic names like "count" and "value"; instead, describe the items being counted or the value stored in the parameter.
The first parameter for an instance method should always be self. The first parameter for a class method should always be cls.
Examples: size, x_coordinate, no_lines
A local variable of a method contains information that helps describe the state of the method during its execution. A local-variable should be a noun phrase that describes the information that it contains. However, the local variable still needs a more precise comment that describes it.
Local variables should start with a lower case letter. You may either use underscores or CamelCase, but you must be consistent throughout the module.
If the body of a function is short, or the places in which a local variable is used is fairly short, then a short, one-or-two letter name can be used for the local variable (see also the conventions for parameter names). A name like the_loop_counter or first_number instead of kk or x causes clutter. If the local variable is used only in a short context, and if it is suitably defined with a comment at its place of first assignment, then use the short name.
A variable used as a flag should be named for what the flag represents, like no_more_pizza, rather than simply flag. In addition, you should avoid generic names like "count" and "value"; instead, describe the items being counted or the value stored in the variable.
Examples: PI, Y, E, WINDOW_SIZE
Global variables should be reserved for constants (e.g. variables that do not change after their initial assignment). Standard practice for constants is to write them in upper case with underscores as needed.
Unlike other languages, Python does not enforce constants. It is possible (but a bad idea) to change a constant variable. This is an instance where the use of a naming convention is incredibly important. The user of uppercase indicates that it is a bad idea to change this variable.
Example: FilterInputStream, LivingMammals
Since a class represents a set of possible objects, each of which is an instance of the class, a class name should generally be a noun phrase that identifies the possible objects. Class names are written in proper CamelCase, with the first letter capitalized.
Example: drawOval, fillOval, length, toString, _privateMethod
The guidelines for method names are similar to those for function names except that we use CamelCase (with first letter lowercase) rather than underscores. Methods that are private (e.g. should only be used as a helper method) should begin with an underscore.
The first parameter in an instance method should always be self. The first parameter in a class method should always be cls.
A field name, or instance variable as they are sometimes called, should be CamelCase with with the first letter lowercase. Fields that are private (e.g. are not accessed outside of the instance methods) should begin with an underscore.
Examples: size, xCoordinate, noLines, _privateFieldA field name, or instance variable as they are sometimes called, contains information that helps describe the state of the object in which it occurs. Hence a field name should be a noun phrase that describes the information the field contains. However, the field still needs a more precise comment that describes it.
A field should be CamelCase with with the first letter lowercase. Fields that are private (e.g. are not accessed outside of the instance methods) should begin with an underscore.
Examples: size, xCoordinate, noLines
A property looks like a field, but it is really a collection of accessor methods (getters, setters, and deleters) for manipulating a field. A property typically corresponds to a field, which is private. As such the property name should be the same as the field name, but without the leading underscore.
Return to Table of Contents
Python has two types of comments: single line comments (which start with a # sign) and docstrings (which are enclosed in triple quotes). The following is a general rule regarding commenting:
Specifications are docstrings; all other comments are single line comments.
All specification comments, be they for a function, module, or class, follow the same format. They are a docstring enclosed in triple-quotes on either side. They should start with a simple description that can fit on exactly one line. This should be followed by a blank line, and then a more detailed description of the specification.
For example, here is a detailed specification for the function
draw_oval(x, y, w, h): """Draw an ellipse that fits within the rectangle given. The upper left corner of the rectange is at position (x,y), its width is w, and its height is h. Use the current color to draw the ellipse."""Note that we do not go into detail about the parameters until after the blank line. The goal is to make a first line that is as descriptive, but short, as possible.
Sometimes the first line of the specification is enough information. In that case, there is no need for the blank line, as shown in the example below:
def time(s): """Return: copy of s with no leading or trailing whitespace"""
Module comments are extremely important for this course, particularly as they are typically the first thing that we read when we grade your assignments. Module comments should be the very first thing in any module (e.g. a .py file), and they are composed of two parts.
The first part of a module comment should use single line comments over three lines.
The very first line should be the name of the module. The second line should be the
name of the author; please include your netid. Finally, the last line should be the date
that the file was last modified. For example, here are the first three lines of a
# sample.py # Walker White (wmw2), Lillian Lee (ljl2) # August 24, 2012
The second part of the module comment should be the module specification, presented as
a docstring. This is the documentation that will display when you use the
Here is an example of a module comment in full:
# sample.py # Walker White (wmw2), Lillian Lee (ljl2) # August 24, 2012 """Module to demonstrate basics of Python style This module does not do anything interesting when it is loaded or run as an application. The primary purpose of this module is to demonstrate good programming style in Python."""
Every function header should be followed by a comment giving its specification. The specification comment should be a docstring, following the basic rules for specifications. It should be indented, just like the rest of the function body.
This specification, together with the function header — which gives the function name and number parameters — should provide all of the information needed to use the function. It should describe any restrictions on the parameters and what the function does, not how it does it. Someone should never have to look at the body of a method to understand how to use it.
One of the most important aspects of the specification comment is to describe the parameters of the function. This can typically be written in a few sentences. Here is an example:
def find_common (t, c): """Print the most frequently occurring temperature in t[0:c]. t is a sequence of floats, of length > c, that represent the temperature in degrees centigrade. If there is more than one possibility for the most frequently occuring temperature, print the least such temperature. PRECONDITIONS: t is a sequence of floats c is an int, 0 <= c < len(t) """
Unfortunately, it is more typical to find someone write a comment like the following (if any comment is provided at all).
def find_common (t, c): """Find most frequent temperature"""
This specification fails to say what part of sequence t is to be included in finding the most frequent temperature. It also fails to say what it should do with the value it finds (Print it? Return it?). The only way for the user to find out is to look at the body of the method (if it is available), and that should not be necessary.
With that said, long paragraphs are just as hard to read as code. When you
write comments they should be as short and to the point as possible. For a
fruitful function (i.e. one that returns a value other than
def dist(x1, y1, x2, y2): """Returns: distance between points (x1,y1) and (x2,y2)"""
Another good rule of thumb comes from The Elements of Style, a famous little book on writing style by Cornell Professors W. Strunk, Jr., and E.B. White. Comments should always use active voice whenever possible to keep the information short and direct. For example, do not write the specification "This function searches list x for a value y and ..." or "Function isIn searches list x for a value y ...". Such specifications are too wordy and are not commands but descriptions. Instead, they should say the following:
def isin(y, list): """Returns: True if y is in list PRECONDITIONS: list is a list of values """
As a final word, note that all of our functions specifications end with a section labeled "PRECONDITIONS". While this information is often mentioned in the descriptive paragraph that preceeds it, this is a handy quick reference to remind the programmer of the preconditions required by that particular function.
Just as the sentences of an essay are grouped in paragraphs, so the sequence of statements of the body of a method should be grouped into logical units. Often, the clarity of the program is enhanced by preceding a logical unit by a comment that explains what it does. This comment serves as the specification for the logical unit; it should say precisely what the logical unit does.
The comment for such a logical unit is called a "statement-comment". This comment should be written as a command to do something. Here is an example:
# Truthify x >= y by swapping x and y if needed. if (x < y): tmp = x x = y y = tmp
The comment should explain what the group of statements does, not how it does it. Thus, it serves the same purpose as the specification of a method: it allows one to skip the reading of the statements of the logical unit and just read the comment. With suitable statement-comments in the body of a method, one can read the method at several "levels of abstraction", which helps one scan a program quickly to find a section of current interest, much like on scans section and subsection headings in an article or book. But this purpose is served only if statement-comment are precise.
Statement comments should be complete. For example, the following comment is inadequate:
# Test for valid input
What happens if the input is valid? What if it isn't; is an error message written or is some flag set? Without this information, one must read the statements for which this statement-comment is a specification, and the whole purpose of the statement comment is lost.
Placement of Statement-Comments
Here is a more extended example of a statement comments.
# Truthify the definition of t; return false if not possible # Eliminate whitespace from the beginning and end of t while (len(t) != 0 and t.isspace()): t= t[1:] # If t is empty, print an error message and return if (len(t) == 0): ... return False; if (contains_capitals(t)): ... # (End of Truthify the definition of t) # Store the French translation of t in t_french ...
At the highest level, this program fragment consists of two statements: (0) Truthify the definition "t" and (1) Store the French translation of "t" in "t_french". The statement "Truthify the definition of t" is implemented in three steps, two of which are themselves statement-comments. Thus, this program fragment has three levels of abstraction.
The comments identifying a statement-comment generally go at the start of the code fragment. Therefore, it is easy to tell where a statement-comment begins; however, it is just as important to tell where it ends. For the simplest statement-comments — those that do not have any statement-comments nested inside of them — they clearly end when we see the comment for the next statement-comment. For example, "Eliminate whitespace from the beginning and end of t" is complete by the time we reach "If t is empty, print an error message and return"
However, this is problematic for more complex statement-comments. The statement-comment "Truthify the definition of t" has statement-comments inside of it. It is not complete by the time we see "Eliminate whitespace from the beginning and end of t". Therefore we have to add an additional comment marking the end of this statement-comment, which we have done in the example above.
In our example, note the reliance on the definition of "t" in the statement-comment "Truthify the definition of t" This allows the statement-comment to be short but precise. But it means that we must have a suitable definition for "t" at its first assignment.
In order to avoid plagiarism, you should always credit a co-author or source. Co-authors should be credited in the module comments. If someone is not a co-author (e.g. they did not write code), but they influenced the code through other means, you should acknowledge this in the module specification. For example:
# sample.py # Walker White (wmw2), Lillian Lee (ljl2) # August 24, 2012 """Module to demonstrate basics of Python style This module does not do anything interesting when it is loaded or run as an application. The primary purpose of this module is to demonstrate good programming style in Python. This module was written after a discussion with Steve Marschner (srm2), though he did not contribute any code. """
For specific algorithms or code fragments, the acknowledgement should be in the should be in the function specification. For example:
def collides(shape1, shape2): """Returns: True if shape1 and shape2 intersect This function is an implementation of the Gilbert- Johnson-Keerthi distance algorithm, as described in the article "A fast procedure for computing the distance between complex objects in three-dimensional space", IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, Vol 4. Issue 2, 1988. PRECONDITIONS: shape1 is an object of class Shape shape2 is an object of class Shape """
Return to Table of Contents
Every significant variable and data structure needs a precise and complete definition, which provides whatever information is needed to understand the variable The most useful information is often the invariant properties of the data: facts that are always true except, perhaps, momentarily, when several related variables are being updated.
Variable definitions should accompany the very first assignment of a variable (e.g. when the variable is first created). They should be single line comments. They should either be on the line just before the variable assignment, or on the same line as the assignment.
Important Hint: Write the definition of a set of variables when you first conceive of using them, and type the definitions as comments into the program when you type in the declarations of the variables. If you later decide to change the meanings of the variables, change the definitions before you change the statement that use the variables.
Variable definitions should be written using single line comments. Here is an example of a definition for two variables "i" and "current_item"; note that they are defined in a single comment because they are related.
# 0 <= i <= current_item < number_items and i is the smallest value # such that item i's price is at most item current_item's price.
The more precise a definition, the better. Comments like "flag for loop" or "index into b" are useless; they only say how the variable is used, but not what it means.
Related variables should be declared and described together. For example, the definition of a table should describe not only the sequence that holds the data but also the integer variable that contains the number of items currently in the table. In the example below, for utmost clarity. spaces are used to line up the comments.
max_temp = 150 # max number of temperature readings n_temp = 0 # Temperature readings are in # temp[0:nTemp], where temps = float(max_temp) # 0 <= nTemp < maxTemp
Class specifications are docstrings that immediately precede the class header, shown as follows:
class RGB(object): """An instance is a RGB color value."""
The specification docstring is indented to the same level as fields and methods in the class. It also follows the basic rules for specifications.
Fields of a class are commented just as variable definitions are (with single line comments, and not docstrings). Method specifications behave just like function specifications.
Even though they act like fields, properties should have specifications, written as a docstring. The comment should follow the basic rules for specifications. However, the specification should be written like a variable definition, and not a method specification. That is, it should state the invariants of the property, but nothing about what the setter, getter, and deleter do.
The specification should accompany the definition of the getter, which occurs
before the setter and deleter. For example, here is an expanded version of
class RGB(object): """An instance is a RGB color value.""" @property def red(self): """Red channel; int between 0 and 255, inclusive.""" return self._red @red.setter def red(self, v): assert (v >= 0 and v <= 255), "%s is outside [0,255]" % `v` assert (type(v) == types.IntType), "%s is not an int" % `v` self._red = v @red.deleter def red(self): del self._red
Note that the setter and deleter do not require specifications. Their behavior is fully specified by the invariant given in the specification for the getter. There are a few exceptions to this rule — when we might want to comment a setter or deleter separately — but that is rare and will be discussed in class.
Return to Table of Contents
The ideas in this missive originated in the structured-programming movement of the 1970's. They are every bit as applicable today. Many examples and ideas were taken from old Cornell CS100 and and CS211 handouts, originating in the work of Richard Conway and David Gries (see their 1973 text on An Introduction to Programming, using PL/C). They are discussed in the text Multimedia Introduction to Programming Using Java, by Paul and David Gries, the textbook for the Java version of CS1110. Hal Perkins also had a hand in writing an earlier version this document.
The current version of this document was written by Walker White as part of the transition of CS1110 to Python. In addition to the earlier version by David Gries, he incorporated many of the official style conventions outlined in PEP 257. Some of the examples here come from that article.
Return to Table of Contents
|Course Material Authors: D. Gries, L. Lee, S. Marschner, C. Van Loan & W. White (over the years)|