Here you go. Start with the one-page summary, then the body of the proposal. After that, read the reviews; a few thoughts on that are below. You can also look at the references and biography if you want, though those are fairly standard.
I'd say I spent a little more time talking about education/outreach than I was generally advised to, but I thought it was important to do (and it's specifically asked for in the CAREER request for proposals). I tried to think of things that weren't just "create another class", and things that would actually help people address the questions in the proposal.
I include the reviews too, so you can see what aspects of the proposal (and ed plan) the reviewers liked and didn't like. The main weakness was that the research activities themselves were not as integrated as some reviewers would have liked -- which is true, the two main domains are pretty separate and although I told the best integrating story I could, they picked up on that. They also wished I had spoken a little more concretely about how to evaluate the second section. But they liked the combination of an area that I clearly had done work in (social networks and recommendations) and I did talk about some preliminary work I did in the other area (reminiscence and repurposing social media data) that helped convince reviewers that I was going to be able to do the kind of work I proposed. They also liked on balance that the educational activities weren't just boilerplate.