\begin{abstract}
We present an analysis of the discovery reach for supersymmetric
particles at the upgraded Tevatron collider, assuming that SUSY breaking
results in universal soft breaking parameters at the grand unification
scale, and that the lightest supersymmetric particle is stable and
neutral. We first present a review of the literature, including
the issues of unification, renormalization group evolution of the 
supersymmetry breaking parameters and the effect of radiative corrections
on the effective low energy couplings and masses of the theory. We 
consider the  experimental bounds coming from direct searches and
those arising indirectly from precision data, 
cosmology and the requirement of vacuum stability. The issues of flavor
and CP-violation are also addressed. The main subject of this study is to update sparticle production cross
sections, make improved estimates of backgrounds, delineate the
discovery reach in the supergravity framework, and examine how this might vary 
when assumptions about universality of soft breaking parameters are
relaxed. With 30~fb$^{-1}$ luminosity and one detector, charginos and
neutralinos,  as well as  third generation squarks, can be seen if their
masses are  not larger than  200--250~GeV, while 
first and second generation squarks and gluinos can be discovered if 
their masses do not  significantly exceed 400~GeV. We conclude that there are
important and exciting physics opportunities at the Tevatron collider, which 
will be significantly enhanced  by continued Tevatron
operation beyond the first phase of Run II.
This report is organized as follows:  In Sections 1--4 we introduce
the SUGRA model.  In Sections 5--10 we discuss radiative corrections
to masses and couplings and particle production and decay.  In
Sections 11--21 we discuss current constraints on models.
Lastly, Sections 22--32 contain the
analyses for Run II supersymmetry searches at the Tevatron.

\end{abstract}
&latex209
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%
%     This is the TeX driver for the Sugra report.
%     It can be TeXed separately, or called by the
%     TeX driver of the full report.
%     This flexibility requires that all frontmatter definitions
%     occur BEFORE \begin{document}, but all definitions
%     required by the main document occur AFTER \begin{document}.
%  

\documentstyle[epsfig,axodraw]{aipproc2}

%% Since aipproc2.sty is revtex-based, you need to use this kludge in order
%% to tex the file if you are running latex2e, even in 2.09 compatibility mode.
%% But it will cause errors if running old latex2.09
%%%%  Start of file revtex.cls %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%
%% This file allows REVTeX v3.1 to function correctly under
%% the 12/94 release of LaTeX 2e. Put this file wherever
%% revtex.sty is. Continue to use \documentstyle{revtex}
%% (with the correct options) and REVTeX will run normally
%% in compatibility mode. Thanks to David Carlisle for
%% pointing out this fix. 
        
\catcode`@=11          
\ifx\every@math@size\undefined\else              
  \let\old@expast\@expast
  \def\@expast#1{\old@expast{#1}\let\@tempa\reserved@a}
\fi
\catcode`@=12
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% end revtex.cls %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

%% \tableofcontents is not defined in either aipproc2.sty or latex.tex
%% this \def can be found in article.sty or aps.sty
\catcode`@=11\def\tableofcontents{\section*{\contentsname
\@mkboth{\uppercase{\contentsname}}{\uppercase{\contentsname}}}%
\@starttoc{toc}}
\catcode`@=12

%% set level for sections, subsections, etc. to appear in TOC
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

\begin{document}

\newcommand{\lsim}{\mathrel{\raisebox{-.6ex}{$\stackrel{\textstyle<}{\sim}$}}}
\newcommand{\gsim}{\mathrel{\raisebox{-.6ex}{$\stackrel{\textstyle>}{\sim}$}}}
\let\alt=\lsim
\let\agt=\gsim
\def\lc{\lowercase}


\input{sugra.titlepage}

\clearpage
\pagestyle{plain}
\pagenumbering{roman}
\tableofcontents


\clearpage
\pagenumbering{arabic}

\input{Nath/nath}

\clearpage
\input{Wagner/proceed}

\clearpage
\input{Kao/conventions}

\clearpage
\input{Kao/rges}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

%% ii)

\clearpage
\input{Zhang/wgnew} 

\clearpage
\input{Feng/feng-new}  %


\clearpage
\input{Pierce/susy-corrs} 

\clearpage
\input{Spira/paper}

\clearpage
\input{E.Berger/fnalrep} %% new version 9/21/99 

\clearpage
\input{BaerHan/runii} 



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

%% iii)

\clearpage
\input{Falk/lepbnds} 

\clearpage
\input{Kamon-cdf-do/1e2} 

\clearpage
\input{Szalap/final}

\clearpage
\input{Falk-cosmo/cosmonew}

\clearpage
\input{Arnowitt-cdm/cdm}

\clearpage
\input{Abel/run-II}  % charge and color breaking constraints

\clearpage
\input{Bhrlik/bsg} 

\clearpage
\input{Blazek/g_2wrkshp}

\clearpage
\input{Bhrlik/cp-new}

\clearpage
\input{Cheng/r2report} 

\clearpage
\input{Keung/cp-top}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

%% iv)

\clearpage
\input{Kamon-runii-param/runii-new}

\clearpage
\input{HanTata/file}

\clearpage
\input{Baer-4D/sims}

\clearpage
\input{Eboli-4F/draft04}

\clearpage
\input{Kao/trilepton}  %% with added paragraph from Matchev

\clearpage
\input{Matchev-2l/dilep}  %% new Oct. 99

\clearpage
\input{Nachtman/likesign}  

%% new version received 10/4/99
\clearpage
\input{Matchev-tau/tau}

\clearpage
\input{Baer-non-u/non-u}  

\clearpage
\input{Arnowitt-trilep/trilep-new}  % new version Oct. 99 

\clearpage
\input{Tata-4E/tata-4E}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%% v)

\clearpage
\input{Tata-summary/summary} 

\end{document}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%



\vspace*{1in}

\begin{center}
{\LARGE\bf Report of SUGRA Working Group\\[1ex]
 for Run II of the Tevatron}\\[.5in]


\begin{tabular}{l@{\hspace{.5em}}l}
Theory conveners:& V.~Barger$^1$\\
                 & C.E.M.~Wagner$^2$\\[2mm]
CDF contact:& T.~Kamon$^3$\\
D0 contact:& E.~Flattum$^4$\\[2mm]
Physics editors:& T. Falk$^1$\\
                & X. Tata$^5$
\end{tabular}

\bigskip

S.~Abel$^2$,
E.~Accomando$^3$,
G.~Anderson$^6$,
R.~Arnowitt$^3$,
P.~Azzi$^7$,
H.~Baer$^8$,
J.~Bagger$^9$,
W.~Beenakker$^{10}$,
A.~Belyaev$^{11}$,
E.~Berger$^{12}$,
M.~Berger$^{13}$,
M.~Brhlik$^{14}$,
T.~Blazek$^{5}$,
S.~Blessing$^8$,
W.~Bokhari$^{15}$,
N.~Bruner$^{16}$,
M.~Carena$^4$,
D.~Chakraborty$^{17}$,
D.~Chang$^{45}$,
P.~Chankowski$^{18}$,
C.-H.~Chen$^{19}$,
H.-C.~Cheng$^4$,
M.~Chertok$^3$,
G.C.~Cho$^{20}$,
D.~Claes$^{21}$,
R.~Demina$^4$,
J.~Done$^3$,
L.~Duflot$^{44}$,
B.~Dutta$^3$,
O.J.P.~\'Eboli$^{1,11}$,
S.~Eno$^{22}$,
J.~Feng$^{23}$,
G.~Ganis$^{24}$,
M.~Gold$^{16}$,
E.M.~Gregores$^1$,
K.~Hagiwara$^{20}$,
T.~Han$^1$,
B.~Harris$^8$,
K.~Hikasa$^{25}$,
C.~Holck$^{15}$,
C.~Kao$^1$,
Y.~Kato$^{26}$,
M.~Klasen$^{12}$,
W.-Y.~Keung$^{27}$,
M.~Kr\"amer$^2$,
S.~Lammel$^4$,
T.-J.~Li$^1$,
J.D.~Lykken$^4$,
M.~Magro$^1$,
S.~Mani$^{19}$,
K.T.~Matchev$^4$,
M.~Mangano$^2$,     
P.~Mercadante$^{5}$,
S.~Mrenna$^{12}$,
J.~Nachtman$^{28}$,
P.~Nath$^{29}$,
M.M.~Nojiri$^{30}$,  
A.~Nomerotski$^{31}$,
D.~Norman$^3$,
R.~Oishi$^{32}$,
K.~Ono$^{33}$,
F.~Paige$^{34}$,
M.~Paterno$^4$,
S.~Parke$^4$,
D.~Pierce$^9$,
A.~Pilaftsis$^2$,
T.~Plehn$^1$,
A.~Pompos$^{36}$,
N.~Polonksy$^{37}$,
S.~Pokorski$^{18}$,
P.~Quintana$^8$,
M.~Roco$^4$,
D.~Saltzberg$^{28}$,
A.~Savoy-Navarro$^{38}$,
Y.~Seiya$^{32}$,
C.~Smith$^9$,
M.~Spira$^{39}$,
M.~Spiropulu$^{40}$,
Z.~Sullivan$^{12}$,
R.~Szalapski$^{41}$,
B.~Tannenbaum$^{28}$,
T.~Tait$^{12,42}$,
D.~Wackeroth$^{43}$,
Y.~Wang$^{5}$,
J.~White$^3$,
H.H.~Williams$^{15}$,
M.~Worcester$^{28}$,
S.~Worm$^{16}$,             % New Mexico
R.-J.~Zhang$^1$,
M.~Zielinski$^{41}$


\input{sugra.abstract}

\newpage

\begin{tabular}{l}
$^1$Physics Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706\\
$^2$CERN, Theory Division, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland\\
$^3$Center for Theoretical Physics, Texas A\&M University, College Station, TX 77843\\
$^4$Theory Group, Fermilab, P.O.Box 500, Batavia, IL, 60510\\
$^{5}$Physics Department, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HA 96822\\
$^6$Department of Physics \& Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA\\
$^7$Universita di Padova, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica 
          Nucleare, Sezione di Padova, I-35131 Padova, Italy\\
$^8$Physics Department, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, 32306\\
$^9$Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218\\
$^{10}$Department of Physics, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, U.K.\\
$^{11}$Instituto de F\'{\i}sica Te\'orica,
              Universidade  Estadual Paulista,
              Rua Pamplona 145, 01405-900 S\~ao Paulo, Brazil.\\
$^{12}$High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439\\
$^{13}$Physics Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA\\
$^{14}$Physics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA\\
$^{15}$Physics Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA\\
$^{16}$Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131\\
$^{17}$State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794\\
$^{18}$Institute of Theoretical Physics, Warsaw University, Poland\\
$^{19}$Physics Department, University of California, Davis, CA 95616\\
$^{20}$Theory Group, KEK, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan\\
$^{21}$Physics Department, University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE 68182\\
$^{22}$Physics Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742\\
$^{23}$Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720\\
$^{24}$Max Planck Institute  f\"ur Physik, F\"ohringer Ring~6, D-80505 Munich, Germany\\
$^{25}$Department of Physics, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan\\ 
$^{26}$Physics Department, Osaka City University, Osaka 588, Japan\\
$^{27}$Physics Department, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago IL 60607\\
$^{28}$Physics Deparment, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024\\
$^{29}$Physics Department, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115\\
$^{30}$Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan\\
$^{31}$Physics Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611\\
$^{32}$Physics Department, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki-ken 305, Japan\\
$^{33}$Physics Department, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113, Japan\\
$^{34}$Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973\\
$^{35}$Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, CA 94309\\
$^{36}$Physics Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907\\
$^{37}$Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08855\\
$^{38}$University of Paris 6\&7, LPTHE, 2 Place Jussieu, F-75251 Paris, France\\
$^{39}$Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik, Universit\"at Hamburg,
Luruper Chaussee 149, D-22761 Hamburg, Germany\\
$^{40}$Physics Department, Harvard University, Cambridge MA 02138\\
$^{41}$Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester,
River Campus, Rochester, NY 14627\\
$^{42}$Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824\\
$^{43}$Paul Scherrer Institut, W\"urenlingen und Villigen,
CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland\\
$^{44}$L.A.L., Universite de Paris-Sud, IN2P3-CNRS, F-91898, Orsay Cedex, France\\
$^{45}$Physics Department, National Tsing-Hua University, Hsinchu 30043, Taiwan, R.O.C.
\end{tabular}

\end{center}

