| BOOKS and COOKS HOMEPAGE PEOPLEBooks and Cooks participants, email addresses and homepages where available.
 PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS and RATING SYSTEMCheck out some of the books we've discussed in the past, as well as our rating system and
    ratings for those books.
 RECIPROCITYThere are lots of other book groups out there. On this page find some links to bookgroups
    we've had e-contact with.
 BOOK LINKSCheck out this pile of book-related links.
 | The
      Daughter of Time by Josephine Tey Discussion date: June 24, 2000 Discussion place: Picnic area,
      Stewart Park Menu: Grill-able foods 
 Amazon.comJosephine Tey is often referred to as the mystery writer for people
      who don't like mysteries. Her skills at character development and mood
      setting, and her tendency to focus on themes not usually touched upon by
      mystery writers, have earned her a vast and appreciative audience. In Daughter
      of Time, Tey focuses on the legend of Richard III, the evil hunchback
      of British history accused of murdering his young nephews. While at a
      London hospital recuperating from a fall, Inspector Alan Grant becomes
      fascinated by a portrait of King Richard. A student of human faces, Grant
      cannot believe that the man in the picture would kill his own nephews.
      With an American researcher's help, Grant delves into his country's
      history to discover just what kind of man Richard Plantagenet was and who really
      killed the little princes.
 From 500
      Great Books by Women; review by Vickie SearsSince its publication in 1951, Josephine Tey's insightful mystery, The
      Daughter of Time has become a major resource on the death of the
      nephews of Richard III. It opens with a bored Detective Alan Grant, stuck
      in his hospital bed with a wounded hip and broken leg. His actress-friend,
      Marta Hallard, notices he is not reading and brings him some portraits to
      occupy his mind. Alan Grant becomes transfixed with the face of Richard
      III, which "had that incommunicable, that indescribable look that
      childhood suffering leaves behind." Thus begins Grant's travel
      through time to solve a five-hundred-year-old mystery: did Richard III
      kill his two nephews and have them buried in the Tower of London in order
      to eliminate all possible contenders for the throne? Initially Grant
      drafts all his friends to help him research; finally he hires Mr.
      Carradine as a real research assistant. Real life history is related to
      the audience through the reading of the characters, especially the
      frustrated curmudgeon, Detective Grant. Due to the detective's
      confinement, there is far less of the fast-paced action one often
      associates with mysteries, but the dialogue and interplay between Grant
      and Carradine is crisp and wonderful, and the conclusion is fascinating.
 
 The Books and Cooks The Daughter of Time Informal Reading Guide(member-generated questions in no particular order)
 
        
          Are you perturbed by the fact that there isn't much
          hard scientific reasoning going on? I.e., "He doesn't look like
          an evil hunchback in his portrait".
          Does this book give a depressing view of historical
          research given that the same result was discovered once per century
          yet still the myth pervades?
          The detective pursued the mystery of Richard III
          because of something he saw in his face in the portrait. Is it more
          likely the artist captured Richard's true nature, or that the art was
          a piece of pro-Richard propaganda? And might the detective's ability
          to lump faces together as belonging to judges or criminals reflect a
          class distinction as much as a moral one?
          The "message" of the book seems to be that
          you see in people or events what you have been taught to see. Is the
          conclusion of Richard III's innocence also tainted by this? How
          convinced are you the truth has been found?
          Would you put this book in the mystery section of a
          bookstore? Why/why not?
          Would the book have read differently if the cover art
          had shown the actual picture that Grant had?
          Most if not all of the action took place in one room.
          Discuss this and its implications on the story, your perceptions, etc. This Page Last Revised: November 21, 2000. |