<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_31_1241246</id>
	<title>Will Smith In For <em>Independence Day 2</em> &amp; <em>3</em></title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1270042140000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>bowman9991 writes <i>"If one isn't enough, there are reports that <a href="http://sffmedia.com/films/science-fiction-films/499-independence-day-2-and-3-are-coming-will-smith-on-board.html">two sequels to Roland Emmerich's 1996 alien invasion blockbuster <em>Independence Day</em></a> are in the works. Will Smith is back too. Apparently he delayed a sequel earlier by asking for too much money."</i>  Other rumors include using an iPad to destroy the alien space ships this time, and letting Obama fly a biplane.  Data will have a 5-minute monologue about what it means to be human.</htmltext>
<tokenext>bowman9991 writes " If one is n't enough , there are reports that two sequels to Roland Emmerich 's 1996 alien invasion blockbuster Independence Day are in the works .
Will Smith is back too .
Apparently he delayed a sequel earlier by asking for too much money .
" Other rumors include using an iPad to destroy the alien space ships this time , and letting Obama fly a biplane .
Data will have a 5-minute monologue about what it means to be human .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bowman9991 writes "If one isn't enough, there are reports that two sequels to Roland Emmerich's 1996 alien invasion blockbuster Independence Day are in the works.
Will Smith is back too.
Apparently he delayed a sequel earlier by asking for too much money.
"  Other rumors include using an iPad to destroy the alien space ships this time, and letting Obama fly a biplane.
Data will have a 5-minute monologue about what it means to be human.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688344</id>
	<title>Apirl fools?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270052760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is is this a joke?</p><p>Seriously sounds like a Apirl fools prank news</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is is this a joke ? Seriously sounds like a Apirl fools prank news</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is is this a joke?Seriously sounds like a Apirl fools prank news</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31697212</id>
	<title>Re:Oh dear lord.</title>
	<author>npsimons</author>
	<datestamp>1270055040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>That was absolutely one of the most cringeworthy aspects of the movie, and they could have fixed it with a single scene.</p><p>Data: "But it's strange - despite their formidable technology, their computer and communications networks are extremely straightforward - no encryption at all. We've spent years reverse-engineering the command codes for their systems. We've had a lot of success - for all the good it has done us."</p><p>Goldblum: "What - an advanced race like this, and the idea of passwords and encryption didn't occur to them?"</p><p>Pullman: "No - they're telepaths. They can't lie or hide anything from each other - and we're the only other advanced civilization they're ever encountered. No other race they've destroyed had computers."</p><p>Goldblum: "Give me everything you have on their computer systems and command codes. I have an idea<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..."</p><p>Sure, it would have still been a stretch, but a lot easier to swallow.</p></div></blockquote><p>You, my good man are a genius.  YOU should be writing (at least parts of) movie scripts.  A thirty second scene (if that!) that could have saved millions of geeks years of agony; brilliant!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That was absolutely one of the most cringeworthy aspects of the movie , and they could have fixed it with a single scene.Data : " But it 's strange - despite their formidable technology , their computer and communications networks are extremely straightforward - no encryption at all .
We 've spent years reverse-engineering the command codes for their systems .
We 've had a lot of success - for all the good it has done us .
" Goldblum : " What - an advanced race like this , and the idea of passwords and encryption did n't occur to them ?
" Pullman : " No - they 're telepaths .
They ca n't lie or hide anything from each other - and we 're the only other advanced civilization they 're ever encountered .
No other race they 've destroyed had computers .
" Goldblum : " Give me everything you have on their computer systems and command codes .
I have an idea ... " Sure , it would have still been a stretch , but a lot easier to swallow.You , my good man are a genius .
YOU should be writing ( at least parts of ) movie scripts .
A thirty second scene ( if that !
) that could have saved millions of geeks years of agony ; brilliant !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was absolutely one of the most cringeworthy aspects of the movie, and they could have fixed it with a single scene.Data: "But it's strange - despite their formidable technology, their computer and communications networks are extremely straightforward - no encryption at all.
We've spent years reverse-engineering the command codes for their systems.
We've had a lot of success - for all the good it has done us.
"Goldblum: "What - an advanced race like this, and the idea of passwords and encryption didn't occur to them?
"Pullman: "No - they're telepaths.
They can't lie or hide anything from each other - and we're the only other advanced civilization they're ever encountered.
No other race they've destroyed had computers.
"Goldblum: "Give me everything you have on their computer systems and command codes.
I have an idea ..."Sure, it would have still been a stretch, but a lot easier to swallow.You, my good man are a genius.
YOU should be writing (at least parts of) movie scripts.
A thirty second scene (if that!
) that could have saved millions of geeks years of agony; brilliant!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686894</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>ground.zero.612</author>
	<datestamp>1270047240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><blockquote><div><p>Queue the continued nerd rage in 3...2...1...</p></div></blockquote><p>Righto.  Should we form the line to the left or the right?</p></div><p>To the left. Here in the US that's the side that has oncoming traffic.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Queue the continued nerd rage in 3...2...1...Righto .
Should we form the line to the left or the right ? To the left .
Here in the US that 's the side that has oncoming traffic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Queue the continued nerd rage in 3...2...1...Righto.
Should we form the line to the left or the right?To the left.
Here in the US that's the side that has oncoming traffic.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690548</id>
	<title>TNT</title>
	<author>mdwstmusik</author>
	<datestamp>1270062240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great!  I'll give the thumbs up to any movie that will add to option of Saturday afternoon movies on the Will Smith channel (aka: TNT).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great !
I 'll give the thumbs up to any movie that will add to option of Saturday afternoon movies on the Will Smith channel ( aka : TNT ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great!
I'll give the thumbs up to any movie that will add to option of Saturday afternoon movies on the Will Smith channel (aka: TNT).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687350</id>
	<title>Re:What the Matrix sequels should have been</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270049220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>eh, sounds pretty boring.</htmltext>
<tokenext>eh , sounds pretty boring .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>eh, sounds pretty boring.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689972</id>
	<title>Re:2 Sequels of a bad film?</title>
	<author>Gogo0</author>
	<datestamp>1270059960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i had the same problem with "How the Grinch Stole Christmas." too much grinch, too much christmas.</p><p>if you didnt want to see american patriotism then dont watch movies with titles of american national holidays!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i had the same problem with " How the Grinch Stole Christmas .
" too much grinch , too much christmas.if you didnt want to see american patriotism then dont watch movies with titles of american national holidays !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i had the same problem with "How the Grinch Stole Christmas.
" too much grinch, too much christmas.if you didnt want to see american patriotism then dont watch movies with titles of american national holidays!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686748</id>
	<title>Naming Technicality</title>
	<author>NonUniqueNickname</author>
	<datestamp>1270046520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>As a trilogy it would no longer be Independence Day.
They would have to rename it to Independence Long Weekend.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a trilogy it would no longer be Independence Day .
They would have to rename it to Independence Long Weekend .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a trilogy it would no longer be Independence Day.
They would have to rename it to Independence Long Weekend.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688514</id>
	<title>It's great</title>
	<author>delevinson</author>
	<datestamp>1270053420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love that movie because David Levinson saves the world with his laptop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love that movie because David Levinson saves the world with his laptop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love that movie because David Levinson saves the world with his laptop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687388</id>
	<title>Re:Foundation</title>
	<author>allcoolnameswheretak</author>
	<datestamp>1270049400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You just shattered my world. Emmerich is going to direct Foundation? Fuck, please, no.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You just shattered my world .
Emmerich is going to direct Foundation ?
Fuck , please , no .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You just shattered my world.
Emmerich is going to direct Foundation?
Fuck, please, no.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31693000</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1270028220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, nerd rage... it&rsquo;s what continued sex deprivation does to you... ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , nerd rage... it    s what continued sex deprivation does to you... ^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, nerd rage... it’s what continued sex deprivation does to you... ^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688114</id>
	<title>Re:What the Matrix sequels should have been</title>
	<author>operagost</author>
	<datestamp>1270051920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Law and Order: Virtual Crimes Unit?  CSI: Zion?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Law and Order : Virtual Crimes Unit ?
CSI : Zion ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Law and Order: Virtual Crimes Unit?
CSI: Zion?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687134</id>
	<title>Re:Will Smith asking for too much money?</title>
	<author>WhatAmIDoingHere</author>
	<datestamp>1270048380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Awwww hell naw.<br> <br>It's like the Will Smith version of Keanu's "woah."<br> <br>Welcome to earf!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Awwww hell naw .
It 's like the Will Smith version of Keanu 's " woah .
" Welcome to earf !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Awwww hell naw.
It's like the Will Smith version of Keanu's "woah.
" Welcome to earf!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686768</id>
	<title>Advertising for the original movie...</title>
	<author>Andy Dodd</author>
	<datestamp>1270046640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does anyone remember all of the advertising that branded it as "ID4" (July 4...)</p><p>So we're going back...  Back in time!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone remember all of the advertising that branded it as " ID4 " ( July 4... ) So we 're going back... Back in time !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone remember all of the advertising that branded it as "ID4" (July 4...)So we're going back...  Back in time!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689650</id>
	<title>Re:Will Smith asking for too much money?</title>
	<author>Prof.PatPending</author>
	<datestamp>1270058460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>ID4s not THAT bad!  If you look at it as a big-budget remake of "Earth VS. the Flying Saucers", it's a pretty good Saturday matinee/popcorn movie.  But still, TWO sequels??!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>ID4s not THAT bad !
If you look at it as a big-budget remake of " Earth VS. the Flying Saucers " , it 's a pretty good Saturday matinee/popcorn movie .
But still , TWO sequels ? ? !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ID4s not THAT bad!
If you look at it as a big-budget remake of "Earth VS. the Flying Saucers", it's a pretty good Saturday matinee/popcorn movie.
But still, TWO sequels??!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689924</id>
	<title>Re:Naming Technicality</title>
	<author>imaque</author>
	<datestamp>1270059720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or maybe it will just be Memorial Day: MD31.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or maybe it will just be Memorial Day : MD31 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or maybe it will just be Memorial Day: MD31.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687066</id>
	<title>Plot Spoiler!</title>
	<author>gambit3</author>
	<datestamp>1270048020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In this one, the aliens come back with a different OS, and now running Antivirus!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In this one , the aliens come back with a different OS , and now running Antivirus !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In this one, the aliens come back with a different OS, and now running Antivirus!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689688</id>
	<title>April Fools</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270058580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, you guys waste no time on posting april fools jokes...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , you guys waste no time on posting april fools jokes.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, you guys waste no time on posting april fools jokes...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688138</id>
	<title>Re:goddamnit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270051980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ring World woudl have problems.</p><p>The story would need serious trimming to make a film. This would irritate fans of the books, and geeks who get there jollies from not liking movies.</p><p>A lot of what happens is interesting because of events from the past that need explaining. Three legged, 2 headed creature doing a spinning back kick when everyone thought they were just cowards. Difficult to explain in a 2 hour movie. The audience just wont be able to relate.</p><p>Now, in a 10 hour mini-series it's entirely doable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ring World woudl have problems.The story would need serious trimming to make a film .
This would irritate fans of the books , and geeks who get there jollies from not liking movies.A lot of what happens is interesting because of events from the past that need explaining .
Three legged , 2 headed creature doing a spinning back kick when everyone thought they were just cowards .
Difficult to explain in a 2 hour movie .
The audience just wont be able to relate.Now , in a 10 hour mini-series it 's entirely doable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ring World woudl have problems.The story would need serious trimming to make a film.
This would irritate fans of the books, and geeks who get there jollies from not liking movies.A lot of what happens is interesting because of events from the past that need explaining.
Three legged, 2 headed creature doing a spinning back kick when everyone thought they were just cowards.
Difficult to explain in a 2 hour movie.
The audience just wont be able to relate.Now, in a 10 hour mini-series it's entirely doable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687836</id>
	<title>Re:Good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270050840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would pay lots and lots of money to to see a romantic comedy starring Jennifer Aniston and Sandra Bullock, except instead of 'romantic' make it 'erotic' and instead of 'comedy' it should be 'made-for-Cinemax late-night women-in-prison movie.'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would pay lots and lots of money to to see a romantic comedy starring Jennifer Aniston and Sandra Bullock , except instead of 'romantic ' make it 'erotic ' and instead of 'comedy ' it should be 'made-for-Cinemax late-night women-in-prison movie .
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would pay lots and lots of money to to see a romantic comedy starring Jennifer Aniston and Sandra Bullock, except instead of 'romantic' make it 'erotic' and instead of 'comedy' it should be 'made-for-Cinemax late-night women-in-prison movie.
'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689384</id>
	<title>Re:Well timed, actually</title>
	<author>GodfatherofSoul</author>
	<datestamp>1270057320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>President Dale: I want the people to know that they still have 2 out of 3 branches of the government working for them, and that ain't bad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>President Dale : I want the people to know that they still have 2 out of 3 branches of the government working for them , and that ai n't bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>President Dale: I want the people to know that they still have 2 out of 3 branches of the government working for them, and that ain't bad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686708</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688704</id>
	<title>Re:Bill Pullman</title>
	<author>d474</author>
	<datestamp>1270054320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Bill Pullman speech is very funny when read by this man:  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VezP6yqhs9k" title="youtube.com">Engrish!</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Bill Pullman speech is very funny when read by this man : Engrish !
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Bill Pullman speech is very funny when read by this man:  Engrish!
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31691090</id>
	<title>Re:Oh dear lord.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270064220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There is no reason to assume that interstellar travel is fast or inexpensive.  Maybe it took the aliens a thousand years and 10 generations to get here, and they haven't got the resources to get to the next closest earth-like planet.</p></div><p>Exactly, and think about this: if it took them 1000 years, how they would see us through their 'telescopes' is a 1000 years ago, so they only expected us to walk around with swords and arrows...</p><p>As you said maybe they didn't really evolve 'predicting extraterestrial behaviour' which is pretty understandable...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no reason to assume that interstellar travel is fast or inexpensive .
Maybe it took the aliens a thousand years and 10 generations to get here , and they have n't got the resources to get to the next closest earth-like planet.Exactly , and think about this : if it took them 1000 years , how they would see us through their 'telescopes ' is a 1000 years ago , so they only expected us to walk around with swords and arrows...As you said maybe they did n't really evolve 'predicting extraterestrial behaviour ' which is pretty understandable.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no reason to assume that interstellar travel is fast or inexpensive.
Maybe it took the aliens a thousand years and 10 generations to get here, and they haven't got the resources to get to the next closest earth-like planet.Exactly, and think about this: if it took them 1000 years, how they would see us through their 'telescopes' is a 1000 years ago, so they only expected us to walk around with swords and arrows...As you said maybe they didn't really evolve 'predicting extraterestrial behaviour' which is pretty understandable...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689852</id>
	<title>Re:Oh dear lord.</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1270059360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Have to agree with you about Jeff Goldblum -- in a single afternoon -- deciphering the alien equivalent of TCP/IP and hacking up a computer virus capable of running on alien hardware. Beyond ridiculous.</i></p><p>Obviously the aliens used Apple hardware.  Fortunately for us, they believed the hype that Apple software was immune to viruses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have to agree with you about Jeff Goldblum -- in a single afternoon -- deciphering the alien equivalent of TCP/IP and hacking up a computer virus capable of running on alien hardware .
Beyond ridiculous.Obviously the aliens used Apple hardware .
Fortunately for us , they believed the hype that Apple software was immune to viruses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have to agree with you about Jeff Goldblum -- in a single afternoon -- deciphering the alien equivalent of TCP/IP and hacking up a computer virus capable of running on alien hardware.
Beyond ridiculous.Obviously the aliens used Apple hardware.
Fortunately for us, they believed the hype that Apple software was immune to viruses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31697772</id>
	<title>Re:HOLY HELL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270062240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, Star Wars would have been way better without that stupid second movie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , Star Wars would have been way better without that stupid second movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, Star Wars would have been way better without that stupid second movie.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686628</id>
	<title>goddamnit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270046100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aren't there other interesting stories that could be told through the art of movies that are not stupid?</p><p>Can't they finally shoot the Ring World or something like that with the same Will Smith as the main character?</p><p>Jesus holly fucker.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are n't there other interesting stories that could be told through the art of movies that are not stupid ? Ca n't they finally shoot the Ring World or something like that with the same Will Smith as the main character ? Jesus holly fucker .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aren't there other interesting stories that could be told through the art of movies that are not stupid?Can't they finally shoot the Ring World or something like that with the same Will Smith as the main character?Jesus holly fucker.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687470</id>
	<title>O come on</title>
	<author>bytesex</author>
	<datestamp>1270049700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>April attacks early this year.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>April attacks early this year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>April attacks early this year.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686876</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270047120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is no time to behave in civilized way. I say we go en masse.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is no time to behave in civilized way .
I say we go en masse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is no time to behave in civilized way.
I say we go en masse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686784</id>
	<title>YAAARRRGGHHH...</title>
	<author>torsmo</author>
	<datestamp>1270046700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please, someone make a movie where the protagonist (preferably American) saves the world from the new iterations of Independence Day...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please , someone make a movie where the protagonist ( preferably American ) saves the world from the new iterations of Independence Day.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please, someone make a movie where the protagonist (preferably American) saves the world from the new iterations of Independence Day...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687878</id>
	<title>Re:Will Smith asking for too much money?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1270051020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will Smith is a fine actor. Look at any film that is about a character, and not about action.</p><p>Early in his career, Will Smith decided to do Sci-Fi films bacause 8 of the top 10 grossing movies are Sci-Fi. Not a bad career decsion, but that means most of his movies are about themes outside the character.</p><p>Watch Ali. The man can act.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will Smith is a fine actor .
Look at any film that is about a character , and not about action.Early in his career , Will Smith decided to do Sci-Fi films bacause 8 of the top 10 grossing movies are Sci-Fi .
Not a bad career decsion , but that means most of his movies are about themes outside the character.Watch Ali .
The man can act .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will Smith is a fine actor.
Look at any film that is about a character, and not about action.Early in his career, Will Smith decided to do Sci-Fi films bacause 8 of the top 10 grossing movies are Sci-Fi.
Not a bad career decsion, but that means most of his movies are about themes outside the character.Watch Ali.
The man can act.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31698014</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1270152180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Haven't you seen J&amp;SBSB?</p><blockquote><div><p>The Internet is a communication tool used the world over where people can come together to bitch about movies and share pornography with one another.</p></div> </blockquote><p>Hope this clears things up for you!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have n't you seen J&amp;SBSB ? The Internet is a communication tool used the world over where people can come together to bitch about movies and share pornography with one another .
Hope this clears things up for you !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Haven't you seen J&amp;SBSB?The Internet is a communication tool used the world over where people can come together to bitch about movies and share pornography with one another.
Hope this clears things up for you!
:)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686612</id>
	<title>April Fools?</title>
	<author>LtGordon</author>
	<datestamp>1270046040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wednesday March 31, @09:29AM</p></div><p>I think they jumped the gun. At least I hope that's the case.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wednesday March 31 , @ 09 : 29AMI think they jumped the gun .
At least I hope that 's the case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wednesday March 31, @09:29AMI think they jumped the gun.
At least I hope that's the case.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689198</id>
	<title>Re:goddamnit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270056480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What like" I am legend?</p><p>The best book I read in several years.</p><p>They put will smith in it.</p><p>People have stopped me watching it just so I don't self harm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What like " I am legend ? The best book I read in several years.They put will smith in it.People have stopped me watching it just so I do n't self harm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What like" I am legend?The best book I read in several years.They put will smith in it.People have stopped me watching it just so I don't self harm.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688414</id>
	<title>Re:Once you seen one Roland Emmerich</title>
	<author>dbosso</author>
	<datestamp>1270053060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You'd think a creative person would want to move on and do something different.</p></div><p>A creative person would.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'd think a creative person would want to move on and do something different.A creative person would .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'd think a creative person would want to move on and do something different.A creative person would.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687718</id>
	<title>Yet another shit movie starring a Scientologist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270050480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone remember when sci-fi moves actually appealed TO fans of sci-fi?</p><p>*sci*...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone remember when sci-fi moves actually appealed TO fans of sci-fi ?
* sci * .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone remember when sci-fi moves actually appealed TO fans of sci-fi?
*sci*...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686658</id>
	<title>Re:Crap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270046220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except that "The Matrix" was actually an interesting movie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except that " The Matrix " was actually an interesting movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except that "The Matrix" was actually an interesting movie.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688576</id>
	<title>Re:Bill Pullman anyone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270053720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh my god, I just realize that Will Smith will be playing the president in the sequel!   His character saved the planet and is now old enough to be President of the U.S.A.  He and Bill Pullman will be good friends, but President Hiller is not popular despite the heroics from his younger days.  Then we get invaded and he's popular again.</p><p>Sometimes I wonder why I still write code.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh my god , I just realize that Will Smith will be playing the president in the sequel !
His character saved the planet and is now old enough to be President of the U.S.A. He and Bill Pullman will be good friends , but President Hiller is not popular despite the heroics from his younger days .
Then we get invaded and he 's popular again.Sometimes I wonder why I still write code .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh my god, I just realize that Will Smith will be playing the president in the sequel!
His character saved the planet and is now old enough to be President of the U.S.A.  He and Bill Pullman will be good friends, but President Hiller is not popular despite the heroics from his younger days.
Then we get invaded and he's popular again.Sometimes I wonder why I still write code.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686874</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686960</id>
	<title>Re:Well timed, actually</title>
	<author>Talderas</author>
	<datestamp>1270047540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tim Burton did that with Mars Attacks!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tim Burton did that with Mars Attacks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tim Burton did that with Mars Attacks!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686708</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686814</id>
	<title>Entire Plot in 1 Slashdot Comment</title>
	<author>Stregano</author>
	<datestamp>1270046820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can just call me Socrates for being able to magically already know the plot.
<br> <br>
There are more aliens that are very angry at the fact that the mothership was destroyed.  What we did not know is that the aliens do live on a planet, and the higher ups on the planet decide that it is time for a war.
<br> <br>
They send a huge alien force to Earth.  Everything looks grim for the humans.
<br> <br>
Will Smith tries and wants to give up since it seems impossible, but something gives him some magical motivation or it seems like there is no way to beat them until Jeff Goldblum thinks of something (which is odd because I never knew Jeff Goldblum was smart to begin with, but I digress).
<br> <br>
With this new idea/more motivation, Will Smith gives it one final shot to stop the alien invasion and succeeds.
<br> <br>
Bruce Willis cries or something emotional and then that is the end of the Independence Day Trilogy.
<br> <br>
P.S. Jeff Goldblum sucks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can just call me Socrates for being able to magically already know the plot .
There are more aliens that are very angry at the fact that the mothership was destroyed .
What we did not know is that the aliens do live on a planet , and the higher ups on the planet decide that it is time for a war .
They send a huge alien force to Earth .
Everything looks grim for the humans .
Will Smith tries and wants to give up since it seems impossible , but something gives him some magical motivation or it seems like there is no way to beat them until Jeff Goldblum thinks of something ( which is odd because I never knew Jeff Goldblum was smart to begin with , but I digress ) .
With this new idea/more motivation , Will Smith gives it one final shot to stop the alien invasion and succeeds .
Bruce Willis cries or something emotional and then that is the end of the Independence Day Trilogy .
P.S. Jeff Goldblum sucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can just call me Socrates for being able to magically already know the plot.
There are more aliens that are very angry at the fact that the mothership was destroyed.
What we did not know is that the aliens do live on a planet, and the higher ups on the planet decide that it is time for a war.
They send a huge alien force to Earth.
Everything looks grim for the humans.
Will Smith tries and wants to give up since it seems impossible, but something gives him some magical motivation or it seems like there is no way to beat them until Jeff Goldblum thinks of something (which is odd because I never knew Jeff Goldblum was smart to begin with, but I digress).
With this new idea/more motivation, Will Smith gives it one final shot to stop the alien invasion and succeeds.
Bruce Willis cries or something emotional and then that is the end of the Independence Day Trilogy.
P.S. Jeff Goldblum sucks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687196</id>
	<title>Re:Oh dear lord.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270048620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe someone finally showed them how to make an alien 'invasion' movie <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District\_9" title="wikipedia.org">correctly</a> [wikipedia.org], so now they think they should give it another go.</p><p>What it boils down to is that every alien invasion movie and TV show ever made comes up against at least two fatal flaws.  First, there's no logical reason for aliens capable of interstellar travel to attack us.  If we're assuming aliens that can live on Earth the assumption must be that Earth-like planets are common, why would the aliens risk starting interstellar war for resources that are apparently quite common unless... Second, aliens capable of interstellar travel would be capable of wiping us out with little to no effort.  The idea that we would win a conflict against a species that has had high technology for at least thousands of years longer than us is quite laughable (actually, the first film handled this correctly for the first 95\% of the movie, humans had inflicted exactly 1 casualty on the aliens since the attacks began, until the ridiculous 'computer virus' crap came in and suddenly the alien craft were made of Papier-m&#226;ch&#233;).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe someone finally showed them how to make an alien 'invasion ' movie correctly [ wikipedia.org ] , so now they think they should give it another go.What it boils down to is that every alien invasion movie and TV show ever made comes up against at least two fatal flaws .
First , there 's no logical reason for aliens capable of interstellar travel to attack us .
If we 're assuming aliens that can live on Earth the assumption must be that Earth-like planets are common , why would the aliens risk starting interstellar war for resources that are apparently quite common unless... Second , aliens capable of interstellar travel would be capable of wiping us out with little to no effort .
The idea that we would win a conflict against a species that has had high technology for at least thousands of years longer than us is quite laughable ( actually , the first film handled this correctly for the first 95 \ % of the movie , humans had inflicted exactly 1 casualty on the aliens since the attacks began , until the ridiculous 'computer virus ' crap came in and suddenly the alien craft were made of Papier-m   ch   ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe someone finally showed them how to make an alien 'invasion' movie correctly [wikipedia.org], so now they think they should give it another go.What it boils down to is that every alien invasion movie and TV show ever made comes up against at least two fatal flaws.
First, there's no logical reason for aliens capable of interstellar travel to attack us.
If we're assuming aliens that can live on Earth the assumption must be that Earth-like planets are common, why would the aliens risk starting interstellar war for resources that are apparently quite common unless... Second, aliens capable of interstellar travel would be capable of wiping us out with little to no effort.
The idea that we would win a conflict against a species that has had high technology for at least thousands of years longer than us is quite laughable (actually, the first film handled this correctly for the first 95\% of the movie, humans had inflicted exactly 1 casualty on the aliens since the attacks began, until the ridiculous 'computer virus' crap came in and suddenly the alien craft were made of Papier-mâché).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31695196</id>
	<title>To be fair...</title>
	<author>GF678</author>
	<datestamp>1270039080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The bit where Jeff Goldblum's character hacks the alien mothership's network to upload a virus, isn't so far fetched after all. Earlier on in the movie he notes how the aliens were using "our own satellites against us", implying they had somehow managed to establish an uplink with our electronics and protocols.</p><p>If the aliens could control our systems, one would believe the reverse could also be true (in the realm of the movie at least).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The bit where Jeff Goldblum 's character hacks the alien mothership 's network to upload a virus , is n't so far fetched after all .
Earlier on in the movie he notes how the aliens were using " our own satellites against us " , implying they had somehow managed to establish an uplink with our electronics and protocols.If the aliens could control our systems , one would believe the reverse could also be true ( in the realm of the movie at least ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The bit where Jeff Goldblum's character hacks the alien mothership's network to upload a virus, isn't so far fetched after all.
Earlier on in the movie he notes how the aliens were using "our own satellites against us", implying they had somehow managed to establish an uplink with our electronics and protocols.If the aliens could control our systems, one would believe the reverse could also be true (in the realm of the movie at least).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690594</id>
	<title>Re:Once you seen one Roland Emmerich</title>
	<author>RyuuzakiTetsuya</author>
	<datestamp>1270062420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm going to go see it.</p><p>not because I particularly care about Roland Emmerich's film making or his stories, I just want to see how long Roland can keep getting bullshit greenlit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm going to go see it.not because I particularly care about Roland Emmerich 's film making or his stories , I just want to see how long Roland can keep getting bullshit greenlit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm going to go see it.not because I particularly care about Roland Emmerich's film making or his stories, I just want to see how long Roland can keep getting bullshit greenlit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31691086</id>
	<title>Re:Good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270064220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Better yet, "You, Your and You're", a romantic comedy starring Jennifer Aniston <b>and</b> Sandra Bullock.</p><p>Yes, I will have the starring role in "Me, Myself and I", a romantic comedy about a Slashdot-reading geek.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Better yet , " You , Your and You 're " , a romantic comedy starring Jennifer Aniston and Sandra Bullock.Yes , I will have the starring role in " Me , Myself and I " , a romantic comedy about a Slashdot-reading geek .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better yet, "You, Your and You're", a romantic comedy starring Jennifer Aniston and Sandra Bullock.Yes, I will have the starring role in "Me, Myself and I", a romantic comedy about a Slashdot-reading geek.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686984</id>
	<title>Re:goddamnit</title>
	<author>GIL\_Dude</author>
	<datestamp>1270047660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm in for Ring World but are you seriously saying Will Smith would be Louis Wu? Or would he dress up in a Wookie outfit and be Speaker To Animals? (Yes, I know a Kzin isn't supposed to look quite like a Wookie - more catlike and all, but it was still funny). He certainly couldn't be a Pierson's Pupeteer or Teela Brown. Darn, why do I remember all their names?<br> <br>I'm sure he's down with rishathra though!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm in for Ring World but are you seriously saying Will Smith would be Louis Wu ?
Or would he dress up in a Wookie outfit and be Speaker To Animals ?
( Yes , I know a Kzin is n't supposed to look quite like a Wookie - more catlike and all , but it was still funny ) .
He certainly could n't be a Pierson 's Pupeteer or Teela Brown .
Darn , why do I remember all their names ?
I 'm sure he 's down with rishathra though !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm in for Ring World but are you seriously saying Will Smith would be Louis Wu?
Or would he dress up in a Wookie outfit and be Speaker To Animals?
(Yes, I know a Kzin isn't supposed to look quite like a Wookie - more catlike and all, but it was still funny).
He certainly couldn't be a Pierson's Pupeteer or Teela Brown.
Darn, why do I remember all their names?
I'm sure he's down with rishathra though!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687204</id>
	<title>I saw this story and laughed...</title>
	<author>iosq</author>
	<datestamp>1270048620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...until I realised it wasn't April 1st yet in America. Then I cried.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...until I realised it was n't April 1st yet in America .
Then I cried .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...until I realised it wasn't April 1st yet in America.
Then I cried.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687978</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1270051440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Movies like "Men in Black" have a more self-conscience sense of humor about themselves that earns them a great deal more tolerance. Movies like "Independence Day" that sell themselves as more serious action movies are expected to have a least a little plausibility in the real world. Aside from the usual problems with a weak script and poor direction, it probably didn't help that Independence Day was loaded with obnoxious product placement (it was like watching a 2 hour long Apple commercial) and other such cynical nods to the fact that the movie was just a crass money grab made by people who could have cared less whether the movie was actually any good or not.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Movies like " Men in Black " have a more self-conscience sense of humor about themselves that earns them a great deal more tolerance .
Movies like " Independence Day " that sell themselves as more serious action movies are expected to have a least a little plausibility in the real world .
Aside from the usual problems with a weak script and poor direction , it probably did n't help that Independence Day was loaded with obnoxious product placement ( it was like watching a 2 hour long Apple commercial ) and other such cynical nods to the fact that the movie was just a crass money grab made by people who could have cared less whether the movie was actually any good or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Movies like "Men in Black" have a more self-conscience sense of humor about themselves that earns them a great deal more tolerance.
Movies like "Independence Day" that sell themselves as more serious action movies are expected to have a least a little plausibility in the real world.
Aside from the usual problems with a weak script and poor direction, it probably didn't help that Independence Day was loaded with obnoxious product placement (it was like watching a 2 hour long Apple commercial) and other such cynical nods to the fact that the movie was just a crass money grab made by people who could have cared less whether the movie was actually any good or not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686880</id>
	<title>What the Matrix sequels should have been</title>
	<author>Junior J. Junior III</author>
	<datestamp>1270047180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's a pity they never made any sequels to that movie.<br>It was really fantastic.</p></div><p>Matrix 2:  A complete re-telling of the first story, this time told as a documentary with dramatic re-enactments, produced by a mainstream media infopinionewstainment law enforcement/most wanted show, colluding with the government of the Matrix world.  Morpheus and Neo demonized and shown to be degenerate, immoral, psychopaths, and terrorists.  By allegory this would show what our own culture does to radicals.  The film ends with Neo being captured, the cliffhanger being his arraignment.  Albino milli vanilli twins are conspicuously absent, and there is no goth night club anywhere.</p><p>Matrix 3:  The trial of Neo.  Rather than using kung fu, he has to use legal fu to get out of his predicament.  The trial is mostly a show trial, the charges are bogus, well, ok the charges are legitimate but the order that Neo was trying to bring down was anything but... and somehow Neo's got to be able to take the stand in order to expose the truth of what the Matrix is to the virtual public.</p><p>That would have made the trilogy completely awesome.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a pity they never made any sequels to that movie.It was really fantastic.Matrix 2 : A complete re-telling of the first story , this time told as a documentary with dramatic re-enactments , produced by a mainstream media infopinionewstainment law enforcement/most wanted show , colluding with the government of the Matrix world .
Morpheus and Neo demonized and shown to be degenerate , immoral , psychopaths , and terrorists .
By allegory this would show what our own culture does to radicals .
The film ends with Neo being captured , the cliffhanger being his arraignment .
Albino milli vanilli twins are conspicuously absent , and there is no goth night club anywhere.Matrix 3 : The trial of Neo .
Rather than using kung fu , he has to use legal fu to get out of his predicament .
The trial is mostly a show trial , the charges are bogus , well , ok the charges are legitimate but the order that Neo was trying to bring down was anything but... and somehow Neo 's got to be able to take the stand in order to expose the truth of what the Matrix is to the virtual public.That would have made the trilogy completely awesome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a pity they never made any sequels to that movie.It was really fantastic.Matrix 2:  A complete re-telling of the first story, this time told as a documentary with dramatic re-enactments, produced by a mainstream media infopinionewstainment law enforcement/most wanted show, colluding with the government of the Matrix world.
Morpheus and Neo demonized and shown to be degenerate, immoral, psychopaths, and terrorists.
By allegory this would show what our own culture does to radicals.
The film ends with Neo being captured, the cliffhanger being his arraignment.
Albino milli vanilli twins are conspicuously absent, and there is no goth night club anywhere.Matrix 3:  The trial of Neo.
Rather than using kung fu, he has to use legal fu to get out of his predicament.
The trial is mostly a show trial, the charges are bogus, well, ok the charges are legitimate but the order that Neo was trying to bring down was anything but... and somehow Neo's got to be able to take the stand in order to expose the truth of what the Matrix is to the virtual public.That would have made the trilogy completely awesome.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687882</id>
	<title>Only a Rumor</title>
	<author>hellfire</author>
	<datestamp>1270051020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Direct from the article:</p><p>"This is still marked as a rumour, so we'll let you know when (and if!) it's confirmed."</p><p>And I can find no reference to a 2 or 3 in IMDB.  Someone's trying to drum up ad hits, methinks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Direct from the article : " This is still marked as a rumour , so we 'll let you know when ( and if !
) it 's confirmed .
" And I can find no reference to a 2 or 3 in IMDB .
Someone 's trying to drum up ad hits , methinks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Direct from the article:"This is still marked as a rumour, so we'll let you know when (and if!
) it's confirmed.
"And I can find no reference to a 2 or 3 in IMDB.
Someone's trying to drum up ad hits, methinks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340</id>
	<title>Re:Oh dear lord.</title>
	<author>Zenaku</author>
	<datestamp>1270052760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Okay.  I know I'm about to get into one of those hypothetical nerd arguments that nobody can win, but what the hell.  I'm waiting for an utterly inadequate laptop to deploy a shamefully bloated enterprise app to a local instance of Websphere, so I've got 10 minutes to kill.</p><p><i>If we're assuming aliens that can live on Earth the assumption must be that Earth-like planets are common, why would the aliens risk starting interstellar war for resources that are apparently quite common</i></p><p>There is no reason to assume that interstellar travel is fast or inexpensive.  Maybe it took the aliens a thousand years and 10 generations to get here, and they haven't got the resources to get to the next closest earth-like planet.</p><p><i>Second, aliens capable of interstellar travel would be capable of wiping us out with little to no effort.</i></p><p>What are you basing this on?  Oh yes of course, the idea that "Technology" constitutes a single field, and that advancement in one area automatically means advancement in others.  Where did everyone get this idea?  If we invent a cure for cancer tomorrow, will we suddenly know how to build a matter teleporter?  It is perfectly conceivable that a species could develop interstellar travel without inventing a way to instantly and selectively kill off a particular species on a planet.  Saying it is laughable is like being surprised that we can put a man on the moon, but still can't cure the common cold.  The two things have nothing to do with one another.</p><p>Have to agree with you about Jeff Goldblum -- in a single afternoon -- deciphering the alien equivalent of TCP/IP and hacking up a computer virus capable of running on alien hardware.  Beyond ridiculous.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay .
I know I 'm about to get into one of those hypothetical nerd arguments that nobody can win , but what the hell .
I 'm waiting for an utterly inadequate laptop to deploy a shamefully bloated enterprise app to a local instance of Websphere , so I 've got 10 minutes to kill.If we 're assuming aliens that can live on Earth the assumption must be that Earth-like planets are common , why would the aliens risk starting interstellar war for resources that are apparently quite commonThere is no reason to assume that interstellar travel is fast or inexpensive .
Maybe it took the aliens a thousand years and 10 generations to get here , and they have n't got the resources to get to the next closest earth-like planet.Second , aliens capable of interstellar travel would be capable of wiping us out with little to no effort.What are you basing this on ?
Oh yes of course , the idea that " Technology " constitutes a single field , and that advancement in one area automatically means advancement in others .
Where did everyone get this idea ?
If we invent a cure for cancer tomorrow , will we suddenly know how to build a matter teleporter ?
It is perfectly conceivable that a species could develop interstellar travel without inventing a way to instantly and selectively kill off a particular species on a planet .
Saying it is laughable is like being surprised that we can put a man on the moon , but still ca n't cure the common cold .
The two things have nothing to do with one another.Have to agree with you about Jeff Goldblum -- in a single afternoon -- deciphering the alien equivalent of TCP/IP and hacking up a computer virus capable of running on alien hardware .
Beyond ridiculous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay.
I know I'm about to get into one of those hypothetical nerd arguments that nobody can win, but what the hell.
I'm waiting for an utterly inadequate laptop to deploy a shamefully bloated enterprise app to a local instance of Websphere, so I've got 10 minutes to kill.If we're assuming aliens that can live on Earth the assumption must be that Earth-like planets are common, why would the aliens risk starting interstellar war for resources that are apparently quite commonThere is no reason to assume that interstellar travel is fast or inexpensive.
Maybe it took the aliens a thousand years and 10 generations to get here, and they haven't got the resources to get to the next closest earth-like planet.Second, aliens capable of interstellar travel would be capable of wiping us out with little to no effort.What are you basing this on?
Oh yes of course, the idea that "Technology" constitutes a single field, and that advancement in one area automatically means advancement in others.
Where did everyone get this idea?
If we invent a cure for cancer tomorrow, will we suddenly know how to build a matter teleporter?
It is perfectly conceivable that a species could develop interstellar travel without inventing a way to instantly and selectively kill off a particular species on a planet.
Saying it is laughable is like being surprised that we can put a man on the moon, but still can't cure the common cold.
The two things have nothing to do with one another.Have to agree with you about Jeff Goldblum -- in a single afternoon -- deciphering the alien equivalent of TCP/IP and hacking up a computer virus capable of running on alien hardware.
Beyond ridiculous.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689122</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270056180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>How can you possibly make a sequel to Independence Day? They defeated the aliens.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Actually, ID5 would be the day human history got interesting.  Humanity has dozens of fried-out alien ship husks littering the planet, and probably a few alien survivors. <em>Lots</em> of advanced technology for the taking.
</p><p>
The first few years after ID4 would be a very interesting time for humanity.  Does the species continue its cooperation and reverse-engineer the ships and their weapons, or do we immediately retreat to our national flags and tear ourselves apart in a race to get the technology before The Other Humans do?
</p><blockquote><div><p>Also, were the aliens migratory, as in the moved from planet to planet like a swarm of locusts?</p></div></blockquote><p>
"African or European?"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)
</p><p>
Not just a Monty Python reference - whaddya think we'd do if we'd just (a) had a hostile first-contact experience, (b) kicked their asses,  and (c) spent a century or so (with an optional world war in the race to see which nation gets to be top dog before we figured out how to work together as a species) reverse-engineering all that technology from the remains of the burned-out city-ships.
</p><p>
If ID5's the story of what happens after first contact (imagine "District 9", but with more hate, and one in which the humans win by preventing the aliens from escaping the camps), ID6 is when we scrap the Federation of <em>Star Trek</em>, and become the Empire of the evil-Spock mirror universe.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How can you possibly make a sequel to Independence Day ?
They defeated the aliens .
Actually , ID5 would be the day human history got interesting .
Humanity has dozens of fried-out alien ship husks littering the planet , and probably a few alien survivors .
Lots of advanced technology for the taking .
The first few years after ID4 would be a very interesting time for humanity .
Does the species continue its cooperation and reverse-engineer the ships and their weapons , or do we immediately retreat to our national flags and tear ourselves apart in a race to get the technology before The Other Humans do ?
Also , were the aliens migratory , as in the moved from planet to planet like a swarm of locusts ?
" African or European ?
" : ) Not just a Monty Python reference - whaddya think we 'd do if we 'd just ( a ) had a hostile first-contact experience , ( b ) kicked their asses , and ( c ) spent a century or so ( with an optional world war in the race to see which nation gets to be top dog before we figured out how to work together as a species ) reverse-engineering all that technology from the remains of the burned-out city-ships .
If ID5 's the story of what happens after first contact ( imagine " District 9 " , but with more hate , and one in which the humans win by preventing the aliens from escaping the camps ) , ID6 is when we scrap the Federation of Star Trek , and become the Empire of the evil-Spock mirror universe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can you possibly make a sequel to Independence Day?
They defeated the aliens.
Actually, ID5 would be the day human history got interesting.
Humanity has dozens of fried-out alien ship husks littering the planet, and probably a few alien survivors.
Lots of advanced technology for the taking.
The first few years after ID4 would be a very interesting time for humanity.
Does the species continue its cooperation and reverse-engineer the ships and their weapons, or do we immediately retreat to our national flags and tear ourselves apart in a race to get the technology before The Other Humans do?
Also, were the aliens migratory, as in the moved from planet to planet like a swarm of locusts?
"African or European?
" :)

Not just a Monty Python reference - whaddya think we'd do if we'd just (a) had a hostile first-contact experience, (b) kicked their asses,  and (c) spent a century or so (with an optional world war in the race to see which nation gets to be top dog before we figured out how to work together as a species) reverse-engineering all that technology from the remains of the burned-out city-ships.
If ID5's the story of what happens after first contact (imagine "District 9", but with more hate, and one in which the humans win by preventing the aliens from escaping the camps), ID6 is when we scrap the Federation of Star Trek, and become the Empire of the evil-Spock mirror universe.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687576</id>
	<title>A little early, right?</title>
	<author>DesertFly</author>
	<datestamp>1270050060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A little early for April Fools' Day, isn't it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>A little early for April Fools ' Day , is n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A little early for April Fools' Day, isn't it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31691990</id>
	<title>Re:Oh dear lord.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270067880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Interstellar Travel in itself is a means in which to destroy a planets.</p><p>Strap whatever it is they are using to propel their huge Motherships through space to something sufficiently large enough (a comet, a moon, a planet, or just use an old mother ship for all I care)  and set it at near light speeds (or hyperspace speeds if it is such a place where hyperspace exists and objects traveling through it can interact with objects not in it) and aim it for earth.  That would damage devastating enough to pretty much end Earth's chance of resistance (i.e. Resistance is Futile)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Interstellar Travel in itself is a means in which to destroy a planets.Strap whatever it is they are using to propel their huge Motherships through space to something sufficiently large enough ( a comet , a moon , a planet , or just use an old mother ship for all I care ) and set it at near light speeds ( or hyperspace speeds if it is such a place where hyperspace exists and objects traveling through it can interact with objects not in it ) and aim it for earth .
That would damage devastating enough to pretty much end Earth 's chance of resistance ( i.e .
Resistance is Futile )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interstellar Travel in itself is a means in which to destroy a planets.Strap whatever it is they are using to propel their huge Motherships through space to something sufficiently large enough (a comet, a moon, a planet, or just use an old mother ship for all I care)  and set it at near light speeds (or hyperspace speeds if it is such a place where hyperspace exists and objects traveling through it can interact with objects not in it) and aim it for earth.
That would damage devastating enough to pretty much end Earth's chance of resistance (i.e.
Resistance is Futile)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686572</id>
	<title>Crap</title>
	<author>COMON$</author>
	<datestamp>1270045860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It will be the matrix all over again....</htmltext>
<tokenext>It will be the matrix all over again... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will be the matrix all over again....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31696124</id>
	<title>Re:Oh dear lord.</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1270044840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Sure, it would have still been a stretch, but a lot easier to swallow.</p></div></blockquote><p>

But he used a mac, they "just work".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , it would have still been a stretch , but a lot easier to swallow .
But he used a mac , they " just work " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, it would have still been a stretch, but a lot easier to swallow.
But he used a mac, they "just work".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31692174</id>
	<title>New characters maybe?</title>
	<author>TREETOP</author>
	<datestamp>1270068540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Somehow, they'll try to add <b>Jar Jar Binks</b> as a comic relief alien. You know, as a formerly <b>bad</b> alien, who's very inept and finds these humans fascinating, even though they're really fugly.
And at the end of the movie, he's hailed by all as one of the heroes,
despite the fact that he arrived with the invaders and was a part of their world for many years.
<b>Only then can we tell the perpetrators of this (I will not call it a movie) abomination.</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>Somehow , they 'll try to add Jar Jar Binks as a comic relief alien .
You know , as a formerly bad alien , who 's very inept and finds these humans fascinating , even though they 're really fugly .
And at the end of the movie , he 's hailed by all as one of the heroes , despite the fact that he arrived with the invaders and was a part of their world for many years .
Only then can we tell the perpetrators of this ( I will not call it a movie ) abomination .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somehow, they'll try to add Jar Jar Binks as a comic relief alien.
You know, as a formerly bad alien, who's very inept and finds these humans fascinating, even though they're really fugly.
And at the end of the movie, he's hailed by all as one of the heroes,
despite the fact that he arrived with the invaders and was a part of their world for many years.
Only then can we tell the perpetrators of this (I will not call it a movie) abomination.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596</id>
	<title>Why?</title>
	<author>ground.zero.612</author>
	<datestamp>1270045920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, why do movies generate so much nerd rage? It's not like it was called "Independence Day: the real life prophecy of the truths to come."</p><p>

It was a movie, made to entertain the masses. Was it any worse than Men in Black? I happened to have enjoyed both films actually. Queue the continued nerd rage in 3...2...1...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , why do movies generate so much nerd rage ?
It 's not like it was called " Independence Day : the real life prophecy of the truths to come .
" It was a movie , made to entertain the masses .
Was it any worse than Men in Black ?
I happened to have enjoyed both films actually .
Queue the continued nerd rage in 3...2...1.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, why do movies generate so much nerd rage?
It's not like it was called "Independence Day: the real life prophecy of the truths to come.
"

It was a movie, made to entertain the masses.
Was it any worse than Men in Black?
I happened to have enjoyed both films actually.
Queue the continued nerd rage in 3...2...1...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687560</id>
	<title>Re:Once you seen one Roland Emmerich</title>
	<author>kalirion</author>
	<datestamp>1270049940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Without over-analyzing, I'd say that Stargate, Independence Day, and 13th Floor were all rather different from each other.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Without over-analyzing , I 'd say that Stargate , Independence Day , and 13th Floor were all rather different from each other .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Without over-analyzing, I'd say that Stargate, Independence Day, and 13th Floor were all rather different from each other.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688318</id>
	<title>Re:2 Sequels of a bad film?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1270052700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The first film was a good sci-fi movie. The script was fine. and much of the acting was above average.</p><p>The CGI was heralded by experts as ground breaking AND the american nationalism is no more then you would expect in a movie about a war in America.</p><p>"It is not exactly going to be compared in cinematic terms to the Godfather trilogy"<br>Why would anyone ever make the connection?</p><p>Clearly you hate the movie because geeks these days are supposed to hate main stream sci fi movies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The first film was a good sci-fi movie .
The script was fine .
and much of the acting was above average.The CGI was heralded by experts as ground breaking AND the american nationalism is no more then you would expect in a movie about a war in America .
" It is not exactly going to be compared in cinematic terms to the Godfather trilogy " Why would anyone ever make the connection ? Clearly you hate the movie because geeks these days are supposed to hate main stream sci fi movies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first film was a good sci-fi movie.
The script was fine.
and much of the acting was above average.The CGI was heralded by experts as ground breaking AND the american nationalism is no more then you would expect in a movie about a war in America.
"It is not exactly going to be compared in cinematic terms to the Godfather trilogy"Why would anyone ever make the connection?Clearly you hate the movie because geeks these days are supposed to hate main stream sci fi movies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687338</id>
	<title>Re:What the Matrix sequels should have been</title>
	<author>MozeeToby</author>
	<datestamp>1270049160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In this vein:</p><p>Independence Day 2:  Aliens show up in a ship that makes the mothership from the first movie look like a civilian pleasure cruise, which, in fact it was.  The aliens that attacked had signed up for an exotic "most dangerous game" type hunting vacation, only to be destroyed by said game.  The Alien's Coast Guard/FBI shows up to investigate what happened and piece together the attacking aliens illegal activities.  Together with humanity, the alien FBI raids the evil cruise line's headquarters for evidence, and eventually successfully bring charges against the executives.</p><p>Independence Day 3:  All shot from the aliens point of view, as a kind of Ocean's 11 movie, beginning with the escape of the executives from their high security prison and leading up to them being stranded on earth with no resources where they fall to drugs, crime, and prostitution.  Eventually rising to the top of the slum cesspool they, become something like the Mafia, only to be brought down in a hail of bullets when they finally piss off the wrong police detective.</p><p>Wow... I can see why L. Ron Hubbard wrote so many books that were so thick.  Writing crappy pulp sci-fi is easy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In this vein : Independence Day 2 : Aliens show up in a ship that makes the mothership from the first movie look like a civilian pleasure cruise , which , in fact it was .
The aliens that attacked had signed up for an exotic " most dangerous game " type hunting vacation , only to be destroyed by said game .
The Alien 's Coast Guard/FBI shows up to investigate what happened and piece together the attacking aliens illegal activities .
Together with humanity , the alien FBI raids the evil cruise line 's headquarters for evidence , and eventually successfully bring charges against the executives.Independence Day 3 : All shot from the aliens point of view , as a kind of Ocean 's 11 movie , beginning with the escape of the executives from their high security prison and leading up to them being stranded on earth with no resources where they fall to drugs , crime , and prostitution .
Eventually rising to the top of the slum cesspool they , become something like the Mafia , only to be brought down in a hail of bullets when they finally piss off the wrong police detective.Wow... I can see why L. Ron Hubbard wrote so many books that were so thick .
Writing crappy pulp sci-fi is easy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In this vein:Independence Day 2:  Aliens show up in a ship that makes the mothership from the first movie look like a civilian pleasure cruise, which, in fact it was.
The aliens that attacked had signed up for an exotic "most dangerous game" type hunting vacation, only to be destroyed by said game.
The Alien's Coast Guard/FBI shows up to investigate what happened and piece together the attacking aliens illegal activities.
Together with humanity, the alien FBI raids the evil cruise line's headquarters for evidence, and eventually successfully bring charges against the executives.Independence Day 3:  All shot from the aliens point of view, as a kind of Ocean's 11 movie, beginning with the escape of the executives from their high security prison and leading up to them being stranded on earth with no resources where they fall to drugs, crime, and prostitution.
Eventually rising to the top of the slum cesspool they, become something like the Mafia, only to be brought down in a hail of bullets when they finally piss off the wrong police detective.Wow... I can see why L. Ron Hubbard wrote so many books that were so thick.
Writing crappy pulp sci-fi is easy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688110</id>
	<title>Re:Why do people complain...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270051920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>agree<br>They could have put in a 5 minute segment telling us how they were able to reverse engineer the alien OS b/c they had their ship in a basement for 50 years, but that would have taken 5 minutes out of the giant airplane action scene which cost x million dollars to shoot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>agreeThey could have put in a 5 minute segment telling us how they were able to reverse engineer the alien OS b/c they had their ship in a basement for 50 years , but that would have taken 5 minutes out of the giant airplane action scene which cost x million dollars to shoot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>agreeThey could have put in a 5 minute segment telling us how they were able to reverse engineer the alien OS b/c they had their ship in a basement for 50 years, but that would have taken 5 minutes out of the giant airplane action scene which cost x million dollars to shoot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690632</id>
	<title>Re:Bill Pullman</title>
	<author>CAIMLAS</author>
	<datestamp>1270062540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bill Pullman is also the best God our generation will ever know.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bill Pullman is also the best God our generation will ever know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bill Pullman is also the best God our generation will ever know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686660</id>
	<title>Once you seen one Roland Emmerich</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270046220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>epic film, you've seen them all.</p><p>Same emotional highs and lows, same treatment of relationships, same everything.</p><p>You'd think a creative person would want to move on and do something different.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>epic film , you 've seen them all.Same emotional highs and lows , same treatment of relationships , same everything.You 'd think a creative person would want to move on and do something different .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>epic film, you've seen them all.Same emotional highs and lows, same treatment of relationships, same everything.You'd think a creative person would want to move on and do something different.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31695598</id>
	<title>Re:Oh dear lord.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270041120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Have to agree with you about Jeff Goldblum -- in a single afternoon -- deciphering the alien equivalent of TCP/IP and hacking up a computer virus capable of running on alien hardware. Beyond ridiculous.</p></div><p>They had been studying it for, what, 50 years? I don't understand why so many people have a problem with this part of the story.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have to agree with you about Jeff Goldblum -- in a single afternoon -- deciphering the alien equivalent of TCP/IP and hacking up a computer virus capable of running on alien hardware .
Beyond ridiculous.They had been studying it for , what , 50 years ?
I do n't understand why so many people have a problem with this part of the story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have to agree with you about Jeff Goldblum -- in a single afternoon -- deciphering the alien equivalent of TCP/IP and hacking up a computer virus capable of running on alien hardware.
Beyond ridiculous.They had been studying it for, what, 50 years?
I don't understand why so many people have a problem with this part of the story.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686698</id>
	<title>Foundation</title>
	<author>Kranerian</author>
	<datestamp>1270046340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article says,</p><p>"If true, this is bad news for the already delayed Asimov Foundation  trilogy: it&rsquo;s likely Roland Emmerich will direct the Independance Day film after his latest film  Anonymous about the life of William Shakespeare, delaying the Foundation start date even further."</p><p>Bad news? No. They seem to be under the impression that we want him to direct the Foundation Trilogy. Anything bringing the possibility of him not doing it is good news indeed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article says , " If true , this is bad news for the already delayed Asimov Foundation trilogy : it    s likely Roland Emmerich will direct the Independance Day film after his latest film Anonymous about the life of William Shakespeare , delaying the Foundation start date even further .
" Bad news ?
No. They seem to be under the impression that we want him to direct the Foundation Trilogy .
Anything bringing the possibility of him not doing it is good news indeed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article says,"If true, this is bad news for the already delayed Asimov Foundation  trilogy: it’s likely Roland Emmerich will direct the Independance Day film after his latest film  Anonymous about the life of William Shakespeare, delaying the Foundation start date even further.
"Bad news?
No. They seem to be under the impression that we want him to direct the Foundation Trilogy.
Anything bringing the possibility of him not doing it is good news indeed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31695492</id>
	<title>Re:Oh dear lord.</title>
	<author>scerruti</author>
	<datestamp>1270040520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm going to go way out on a limb here....</p><p><i>Have to agree with you about Jeff Goldblum -- in a single afternoon -- deciphering the alien equivalent of TCP/IP and hacking up a computer virus capable of running on alien hardware. Beyond ridiculous.</i> </p><p>Earlier in the movie the Aliens had managed to hack into all of Earth's communication satellites in order to broadcast their countdown timer. (They apparently lack accurate time pieces.) Perhaps, in order to communicate with all of Earth's communication satellites, they needed to build a common Earth like interface. Then imagine that they distributed this interface (let's say it was a rudimentary, poorly secured Python interpreter) via a Windows update type mechanism to all their ships. Finally, they built into it the ability to patch itself so that they could add communication routines for other satellites over time to all the ships.</p><p>Now all Jeff Goldblum has to do is write one little Python script that calls a system function in this alien built python interpreter to disable the shields. It turns out the disable the shields command was actually a side effect of a buffer overflow that Jeff discovered when he was trying to make the interpreter display the skull and crossbones.</p><p>It's all actually very believable compared to giant alien ships coming into orbit just to destroy buildings. In fact, come to think of it, it was probably in the movie and then got cut because it was just "too obvious".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm going to go way out on a limb here....Have to agree with you about Jeff Goldblum -- in a single afternoon -- deciphering the alien equivalent of TCP/IP and hacking up a computer virus capable of running on alien hardware .
Beyond ridiculous .
Earlier in the movie the Aliens had managed to hack into all of Earth 's communication satellites in order to broadcast their countdown timer .
( They apparently lack accurate time pieces .
) Perhaps , in order to communicate with all of Earth 's communication satellites , they needed to build a common Earth like interface .
Then imagine that they distributed this interface ( let 's say it was a rudimentary , poorly secured Python interpreter ) via a Windows update type mechanism to all their ships .
Finally , they built into it the ability to patch itself so that they could add communication routines for other satellites over time to all the ships.Now all Jeff Goldblum has to do is write one little Python script that calls a system function in this alien built python interpreter to disable the shields .
It turns out the disable the shields command was actually a side effect of a buffer overflow that Jeff discovered when he was trying to make the interpreter display the skull and crossbones.It 's all actually very believable compared to giant alien ships coming into orbit just to destroy buildings .
In fact , come to think of it , it was probably in the movie and then got cut because it was just " too obvious " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm going to go way out on a limb here....Have to agree with you about Jeff Goldblum -- in a single afternoon -- deciphering the alien equivalent of TCP/IP and hacking up a computer virus capable of running on alien hardware.
Beyond ridiculous.
Earlier in the movie the Aliens had managed to hack into all of Earth's communication satellites in order to broadcast their countdown timer.
(They apparently lack accurate time pieces.
) Perhaps, in order to communicate with all of Earth's communication satellites, they needed to build a common Earth like interface.
Then imagine that they distributed this interface (let's say it was a rudimentary, poorly secured Python interpreter) via a Windows update type mechanism to all their ships.
Finally, they built into it the ability to patch itself so that they could add communication routines for other satellites over time to all the ships.Now all Jeff Goldblum has to do is write one little Python script that calls a system function in this alien built python interpreter to disable the shields.
It turns out the disable the shields command was actually a side effect of a buffer overflow that Jeff discovered when he was trying to make the interpreter display the skull and crossbones.It's all actually very believable compared to giant alien ships coming into orbit just to destroy buildings.
In fact, come to think of it, it was probably in the movie and then got cut because it was just "too obvious".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688874</id>
	<title>Re:Bill Pullman</title>
	<author>nottheusualsuspect</author>
	<datestamp>1270055100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There are several movie critics who stopped publishing reviews for his movies because what they say doesn't matter.</p></div><p>I haven't listened to movie critics for any actor in so long, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger\_Ebert#Battle\_with\_thyroid\_cancer" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">this</a> [wikipedia.org] caught me unawares when someone pointed it out to me 2 months back.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are several movie critics who stopped publishing reviews for his movies because what they say does n't matter.I have n't listened to movie critics for any actor in so long , this [ wikipedia.org ] caught me unawares when someone pointed it out to me 2 months back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are several movie critics who stopped publishing reviews for his movies because what they say doesn't matter.I haven't listened to movie critics for any actor in so long, this [wikipedia.org] caught me unawares when someone pointed it out to me 2 months back.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686934</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270047420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How can you possibly make a sequel to Independence Day? They defeated the aliens.</p><p>Independence Day 2 - The aliens are back with a vengeance!<br>Independence Day 3 - After hijacking a mothership using an iPad nano, Will Smith and Jeff Goldbloom take the fight to the alien homeworld!</p><p>Also, were the aliens migratory, as in the moved from planet to planet like a swarm of locusts?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How can you possibly make a sequel to Independence Day ?
They defeated the aliens.Independence Day 2 - The aliens are back with a vengeance ! Independence Day 3 - After hijacking a mothership using an iPad nano , Will Smith and Jeff Goldbloom take the fight to the alien homeworld ! Also , were the aliens migratory , as in the moved from planet to planet like a swarm of locusts ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can you possibly make a sequel to Independence Day?
They defeated the aliens.Independence Day 2 - The aliens are back with a vengeance!Independence Day 3 - After hijacking a mothership using an iPad nano, Will Smith and Jeff Goldbloom take the fight to the alien homeworld!Also, were the aliens migratory, as in the moved from planet to planet like a swarm of locusts?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689414</id>
	<title>Re:Bill Pullman</title>
	<author>GodfatherofSoul</author>
	<datestamp>1270057500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jack Nicholson in <i>Mars Attacks</i> FTW</p><p>President Dale: I want the people to know that they still have 2 out of 3 branches of the government working for them, and that ain't bad!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jack Nicholson in Mars Attacks FTWPresident Dale : I want the people to know that they still have 2 out of 3 branches of the government working for them , and that ai n't bad !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jack Nicholson in Mars Attacks FTWPresident Dale: I want the people to know that they still have 2 out of 3 branches of the government working for them, and that ain't bad!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689074</id>
	<title>April Fools!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270056000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, April Fools Day isn't until tomorrow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , April Fools Day is n't until tomorrow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, April Fools Day isn't until tomorrow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687178</id>
	<title>April 1st?</title>
	<author>MBGMorden</author>
	<datestamp>1270048560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't it a little early to be starting up the April 1st jokes?</p><p>God I've come to hate this "holiday"/tradition/whatever.  For the first 2-3 years on Slashdot, yep, the jokes were funny.  Now, they're repetitive.  And I get a whole day of having to parse a level of ridiculousness of a story to determine whether it's real or not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't it a little early to be starting up the April 1st jokes ? God I 've come to hate this " holiday " /tradition/whatever .
For the first 2-3 years on Slashdot , yep , the jokes were funny .
Now , they 're repetitive .
And I get a whole day of having to parse a level of ridiculousness of a story to determine whether it 's real or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't it a little early to be starting up the April 1st jokes?God I've come to hate this "holiday"/tradition/whatever.
For the first 2-3 years on Slashdot, yep, the jokes were funny.
Now, they're repetitive.
And I get a whole day of having to parse a level of ridiculousness of a story to determine whether it's real or not.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687602</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Thanshin</author>
	<datestamp>1270050120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Independence Day 2:</p><p>The aliens were the ships. What we thought were the aliens were the ship's parasites. Having discovered a planet that cleans them of parasites, the aliens come <i>en masse</i> to be cleaned. The earth fight endless "alien" hordes, never understanding we've become a galactic "spa" for the aliens.</p><p>Independence Day 3:</p><p>The aliens finally aknowledge the existance of the parasite cleaners who call themselves "hunams". They decide that the "hunams" are Earth's parasites and, fearing contagion, declare the solar system a bio-hazard zone and nuke it from galactical orbit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Independence Day 2 : The aliens were the ships .
What we thought were the aliens were the ship 's parasites .
Having discovered a planet that cleans them of parasites , the aliens come en masse to be cleaned .
The earth fight endless " alien " hordes , never understanding we 've become a galactic " spa " for the aliens.Independence Day 3 : The aliens finally aknowledge the existance of the parasite cleaners who call themselves " hunams " .
They decide that the " hunams " are Earth 's parasites and , fearing contagion , declare the solar system a bio-hazard zone and nuke it from galactical orbit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Independence Day 2:The aliens were the ships.
What we thought were the aliens were the ship's parasites.
Having discovered a planet that cleans them of parasites, the aliens come en masse to be cleaned.
The earth fight endless "alien" hordes, never understanding we've become a galactic "spa" for the aliens.Independence Day 3:The aliens finally aknowledge the existance of the parasite cleaners who call themselves "hunams".
They decide that the "hunams" are Earth's parasites and, fearing contagion, declare the solar system a bio-hazard zone and nuke it from galactical orbit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31691292</id>
	<title>Re:What the Matrix sequels should have been</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270065120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Neo Wright: Ace Attorney</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Neo Wright : Ace Attorney</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Neo Wright: Ace Attorney</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31692442</id>
	<title>Re:Oh dear lord.</title>
	<author>Rande</author>
	<datestamp>1270026240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> If we invent a cure for cancer tomorrow, will we suddenly know how to build a matter teleporter?</p> </div><p>The cure for cancer \_is\_ the matter teleporter.  Just send the patient through the teleporter but omit the cancerous cells.<br>I'm imagining more the Tron digitiser rather than the Star Trek version, but most similar magic techs will do.<br>Pretty much the cure for everything except memory loss if you can rebuild a person up from the subatomic level.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If we invent a cure for cancer tomorrow , will we suddenly know how to build a matter teleporter ?
The cure for cancer \ _is \ _ the matter teleporter .
Just send the patient through the teleporter but omit the cancerous cells.I 'm imagining more the Tron digitiser rather than the Star Trek version , but most similar magic techs will do.Pretty much the cure for everything except memory loss if you can rebuild a person up from the subatomic level .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> If we invent a cure for cancer tomorrow, will we suddenly know how to build a matter teleporter?
The cure for cancer \_is\_ the matter teleporter.
Just send the patient through the teleporter but omit the cancerous cells.I'm imagining more the Tron digitiser rather than the Star Trek version, but most similar magic techs will do.Pretty much the cure for everything except memory loss if you can rebuild a person up from the subatomic level.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688460</id>
	<title>Re:Why do people complain...</title>
	<author>spedrosa</author>
	<datestamp>1270053180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, we should suspend belief from the world around us. But not from the world around the friggin movie.</p><p>Granted, it might be possible to design a virus for alien computer systems. Maybe if we spent a lifetime studying them we just might be able to compile a Hello World. Now, to do that in less than a day, bypassing whatever countermeasures they may have, with the assistance of people who had an alien ship for decades and couldn't figure it out... if you don't call that a stretch, I'm not sure what it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , we should suspend belief from the world around us .
But not from the world around the friggin movie.Granted , it might be possible to design a virus for alien computer systems .
Maybe if we spent a lifetime studying them we just might be able to compile a Hello World .
Now , to do that in less than a day , bypassing whatever countermeasures they may have , with the assistance of people who had an alien ship for decades and could n't figure it out... if you do n't call that a stretch , I 'm not sure what it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, we should suspend belief from the world around us.
But not from the world around the friggin movie.Granted, it might be possible to design a virus for alien computer systems.
Maybe if we spent a lifetime studying them we just might be able to compile a Hello World.
Now, to do that in less than a day, bypassing whatever countermeasures they may have, with the assistance of people who had an alien ship for decades and couldn't figure it out... if you don't call that a stretch, I'm not sure what it is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689332</id>
	<title>Re:goddamnit</title>
	<author>sarhjinian</author>
	<datestamp>1270057080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Screw Ringworld, the cinema cries for <i>Disc</i>world.</p><p>And no, the one with Sean Astin as Twoflower doesn't count.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Screw Ringworld , the cinema cries for Discworld.And no , the one with Sean Astin as Twoflower does n't count .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screw Ringworld, the cinema cries for Discworld.And no, the one with Sean Astin as Twoflower doesn't count.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31694328</id>
	<title>Re:April Fools' Day?</title>
	<author>izomiac</author>
	<datestamp>1270034580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>TFA says "This is still marked as a rumour, so we'll let you know when (and if!) it&rsquo;s confirmed." and no other sources are provided.  It is currently Thursday, April 1, 2010 at 12:22:38 PM on Christmas Island (6:22 PM EDT).</htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA says " This is still marked as a rumour , so we 'll let you know when ( and if !
) it    s confirmed .
" and no other sources are provided .
It is currently Thursday , April 1 , 2010 at 12 : 22 : 38 PM on Christmas Island ( 6 : 22 PM EDT ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA says "This is still marked as a rumour, so we'll let you know when (and if!
) it’s confirmed.
" and no other sources are provided.
It is currently Thursday, April 1, 2010 at 12:22:38 PM on Christmas Island (6:22 PM EDT).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688336</id>
	<title>Re:Plot Spoiler!</title>
	<author>xav12</author>
	<datestamp>1270052760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No need for antivirus when <a href="http://www.peppertop.com/greys/?p=253" title="peppertop.com" rel="nofollow">they've switched to Ubuntu</a> [peppertop.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>No need for antivirus when they 've switched to Ubuntu [ peppertop.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No need for antivirus when they've switched to Ubuntu [peppertop.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686886</id>
	<title>Re:Will Smith asking for too much money?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270047180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Man... this is crazy... like April Fools day or something.  Oh wait...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Man... this is crazy... like April Fools day or something .
Oh wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man... this is crazy... like April Fools day or something.
Oh wait...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688838</id>
	<title>Re:What the Matrix sequels should have been</title>
	<author>Nukenbar</author>
	<datestamp>1270054980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think anyone wants another Law and Order: The Matrix</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think anyone wants another Law and Order : The Matrix</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think anyone wants another Law and Order: The Matrix</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687010</id>
	<title>bowman9991, you absolutely suck at comedy</title>
	<author>BrowncoatJedi</author>
	<datestamp>1270047720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That was the most unfunny Slashdot submission I have ever read. Truly a cringe-inducing experience. Holy shit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That was the most unfunny Slashdot submission I have ever read .
Truly a cringe-inducing experience .
Holy shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was the most unfunny Slashdot submission I have ever read.
Truly a cringe-inducing experience.
Holy shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688912</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1270055340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, they would \_Jailbreak\_ the mother ship's central computer, and leave SSH enabled with the default root password. Malware will find its way on the ship and all of the consoles on board will display annoying ads and completely take over the computer, dragging it to a halt. The aliens call a truce and agree to part ways if we grant them free licensing to the Norton Internet Security suite (the joke is on them, muahahaha!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , they would \ _Jailbreak \ _ the mother ship 's central computer , and leave SSH enabled with the default root password .
Malware will find its way on the ship and all of the consoles on board will display annoying ads and completely take over the computer , dragging it to a halt .
The aliens call a truce and agree to part ways if we grant them free licensing to the Norton Internet Security suite ( the joke is on them , muahahaha !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, they would \_Jailbreak\_ the mother ship's central computer, and leave SSH enabled with the default root password.
Malware will find its way on the ship and all of the consoles on board will display annoying ads and completely take over the computer, dragging it to a halt.
The aliens call a truce and agree to part ways if we grant them free licensing to the Norton Internet Security suite (the joke is on them, muahahaha!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688470</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Rogerborg</author>
	<datestamp>1270053240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Toooooo much brainthinky.  It's all about the title.

</p><ul>
<li>Idependence Day 2 - Independencer Day</li>
<li>Independence Day 3 - Independendest Day.</li>
</ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>Toooooo much brainthinky .
It 's all about the title .
Idependence Day 2 - Independencer Day Independence Day 3 - Independendest Day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Toooooo much brainthinky.
It's all about the title.
Idependence Day 2 - Independencer Day
Independence Day 3 - Independendest Day.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686872</id>
	<title>One last hope!</title>
	<author>ThePangolino</author>
	<datestamp>1270047060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Rumors have recently been denied by a guy named Will Smith. <a href="http://www.imdb.com/news/ni1926356/" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/news/ni1926356/</a> [imdb.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rumors have recently been denied by a guy named Will Smith .
http : //www.imdb.com/news/ni1926356/ [ imdb.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rumors have recently been denied by a guy named Will Smith.
http://www.imdb.com/news/ni1926356/ [imdb.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688400</id>
	<title>Men in Black II (2002)</title>
	<author>AlpineR</author>
	<datestamp>1270053000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I enjoyed Independence Day and Men in Black, too. Both were fun, a little wacky, not terribly sophisticated, but they suck me in every time they're on TV.</p><p>So my only concern is the sequel part (Good Movie 2: The Quest for More Money). Men in Black (1997): 7.0/10.0 on IMDB. Men in Black II (2002): 5.6/10.0.</p><p>And shooting two sequels at once triggers the klaxon of bad movie alarms. See the Matrix and Pirates of the Caribbean trilogies for two examples of twin sequel abominations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I enjoyed Independence Day and Men in Black , too .
Both were fun , a little wacky , not terribly sophisticated , but they suck me in every time they 're on TV.So my only concern is the sequel part ( Good Movie 2 : The Quest for More Money ) .
Men in Black ( 1997 ) : 7.0/10.0 on IMDB .
Men in Black II ( 2002 ) : 5.6/10.0.And shooting two sequels at once triggers the klaxon of bad movie alarms .
See the Matrix and Pirates of the Caribbean trilogies for two examples of twin sequel abominations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I enjoyed Independence Day and Men in Black, too.
Both were fun, a little wacky, not terribly sophisticated, but they suck me in every time they're on TV.So my only concern is the sequel part (Good Movie 2: The Quest for More Money).
Men in Black (1997): 7.0/10.0 on IMDB.
Men in Black II (2002): 5.6/10.0.And shooting two sequels at once triggers the klaxon of bad movie alarms.
See the Matrix and Pirates of the Caribbean trilogies for two examples of twin sequel abominations.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689540</id>
	<title>Re:I surely can't be the only one</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1270057980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...who found it ironic that a film with "Independence" in the title had quite so many product placements in it.</p></div><p>Hey! I use Depend&#174; brand adult diapers, so get off my motherfucking lawn with your predictable urinary cycle.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...who found it ironic that a film with " Independence " in the title had quite so many product placements in it.Hey !
I use Depend   brand adult diapers , so get off my motherfucking lawn with your predictable urinary cycle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...who found it ironic that a film with "Independence" in the title had quite so many product placements in it.Hey!
I use Depend® brand adult diapers, so get off my motherfucking lawn with your predictable urinary cycle.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687490</id>
	<title>Re:Good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270049700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Prime sequel material: Their, There, and They're, though that might work better as a political intrigue piece.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Prime sequel material : Their , There , and They 're , though that might work better as a political intrigue piece .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Prime sequel material: Their, There, and They're, though that might work better as a political intrigue piece.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688822</id>
	<title>Only a nerd woud say "Queue"</title>
	<author>bit9</author>
	<datestamp>1270054920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <b>Cue</b> the continued nerd rage in 3...2...1...</p></div></blockquote><p>
There, fixed that for ya.
</p><p>
The word "queue", when used as a verb (in non-nerd terms), means to line up. The idiom you were thinking of is actually "<b>cue</b> the \_\_\_\_", which is derived from the use of the word cue in a studio and/or stage setting, where a <i>cue</i> is a signal for a performer to enter the scene.
</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>/pedantic</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cue the continued nerd rage in 3...2...1.. . There , fixed that for ya .
The word " queue " , when used as a verb ( in non-nerd terms ) , means to line up .
The idiom you were thinking of is actually " cue the \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ " , which is derived from the use of the word cue in a studio and/or stage setting , where a cue is a signal for a performer to enter the scene .
/pedantic</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Cue the continued nerd rage in 3...2...1...
There, fixed that for ya.
The word "queue", when used as a verb (in non-nerd terms), means to line up.
The idiom you were thinking of is actually "cue the \_\_\_\_", which is derived from the use of the word cue in a studio and/or stage setting, where a cue is a signal for a performer to enter the scene.
/pedantic
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31693390</id>
	<title>Re:Plot Spoiler!</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1270029840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But does it run Linux?<br>(If so, we&rsquo;re fucked!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But does it run Linux ?
( If so , we    re fucked !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But does it run Linux?
(If so, we’re fucked!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688858</id>
	<title>Re:Plot Spoiler!</title>
	<author>MiniMike</author>
	<datestamp>1270055040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In this one, the aliens come back with a different OS, and now running Antivirus!</p></div><p>They're running Windows?  So this will be a short film?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In this one , the aliens come back with a different OS , and now running Antivirus ! They 're running Windows ?
So this will be a short film ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In this one, the aliens come back with a different OS, and now running Antivirus!They're running Windows?
So this will be a short film?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688070</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1270051740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because Geeks can be idiots sometimes.</p><p>The primary reason is that an Apple laptop was used to gain control of the ship.</p><p>Of course the refuse to think about the fact that:</p><p>A) The ship was studied for 50 years<br>B) We know how electronics work<br>C) He didn't necessarily have to be running OSX.</p><p>They seem to think the technology would be magic and impossible to work with. Idiots.</p><p>Except for the ending, it is a perfectly fine 'Aliens going to take over the world' movie.<br>The filming of the plane striking the ship was pretty weak.</p><p>Now, the whole concept that aliens would take over the world by landing here and send in ships is a weak plot in any alien movie.</p><p>They could have just dropped rocks from space.</p><p>I don't mind there being sequels. If they are good, then good for me, if they stink, then I won't go see them. There is a lot of potential in the world they created. Area ll the Aliens dead? Do we take their tech and find more of them? Do they have some type of bacteria that is harm full to humans?<br>What effects does the tech have on our culture? What about other Alien races? Do they come and visit us because we eliminated them? Do we spread out to the stars?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because Geeks can be idiots sometimes.The primary reason is that an Apple laptop was used to gain control of the ship.Of course the refuse to think about the fact that : A ) The ship was studied for 50 yearsB ) We know how electronics workC ) He did n't necessarily have to be running OSX.They seem to think the technology would be magic and impossible to work with .
Idiots.Except for the ending , it is a perfectly fine 'Aliens going to take over the world ' movie.The filming of the plane striking the ship was pretty weak.Now , the whole concept that aliens would take over the world by landing here and send in ships is a weak plot in any alien movie.They could have just dropped rocks from space.I do n't mind there being sequels .
If they are good , then good for me , if they stink , then I wo n't go see them .
There is a lot of potential in the world they created .
Area ll the Aliens dead ?
Do we take their tech and find more of them ?
Do they have some type of bacteria that is harm full to humans ? What effects does the tech have on our culture ?
What about other Alien races ?
Do they come and visit us because we eliminated them ?
Do we spread out to the stars ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because Geeks can be idiots sometimes.The primary reason is that an Apple laptop was used to gain control of the ship.Of course the refuse to think about the fact that:A) The ship was studied for 50 yearsB) We know how electronics workC) He didn't necessarily have to be running OSX.They seem to think the technology would be magic and impossible to work with.
Idiots.Except for the ending, it is a perfectly fine 'Aliens going to take over the world' movie.The filming of the plane striking the ship was pretty weak.Now, the whole concept that aliens would take over the world by landing here and send in ships is a weak plot in any alien movie.They could have just dropped rocks from space.I don't mind there being sequels.
If they are good, then good for me, if they stink, then I won't go see them.
There is a lot of potential in the world they created.
Area ll the Aliens dead?
Do we take their tech and find more of them?
Do they have some type of bacteria that is harm full to humans?What effects does the tech have on our culture?
What about other Alien races?
Do they come and visit us because we eliminated them?
Do we spread out to the stars?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688174</id>
	<title>Re:Naming Technicality</title>
	<author>je ne sais quoi</author>
	<datestamp>1270052160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, they're actually moving onto the next holidays in the calendar and hoping to make a franchise of it with a year's worth of holidays.  The first sequel will be Labor day, where the aliens will attack the beaches while WIll Smith is getting his last summer vacation in.  The next will be Columbus day, where the alien space-sailors will contact us and sleep with our women and transfer an alien version of small pox and STDs that will threaten to wipe out up to 90\% of the human population while the aliens are busy melting down our jewelry to ship back to the alien home world.  Fortunately Will Smith and his laptop will be there to upload some anti-bodies into the alien bio-mainframe to stop the viruses.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , they 're actually moving onto the next holidays in the calendar and hoping to make a franchise of it with a year 's worth of holidays .
The first sequel will be Labor day , where the aliens will attack the beaches while WIll Smith is getting his last summer vacation in .
The next will be Columbus day , where the alien space-sailors will contact us and sleep with our women and transfer an alien version of small pox and STDs that will threaten to wipe out up to 90 \ % of the human population while the aliens are busy melting down our jewelry to ship back to the alien home world .
Fortunately Will Smith and his laptop will be there to upload some anti-bodies into the alien bio-mainframe to stop the viruses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, they're actually moving onto the next holidays in the calendar and hoping to make a franchise of it with a year's worth of holidays.
The first sequel will be Labor day, where the aliens will attack the beaches while WIll Smith is getting his last summer vacation in.
The next will be Columbus day, where the alien space-sailors will contact us and sleep with our women and transfer an alien version of small pox and STDs that will threaten to wipe out up to 90\% of the human population while the aliens are busy melting down our jewelry to ship back to the alien home world.
Fortunately Will Smith and his laptop will be there to upload some anti-bodies into the alien bio-mainframe to stop the viruses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686642</id>
	<title>I surely can't be the only one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270046160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...who found it ironic that a film with "Independence" in the title had quite so many product placements in it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...who found it ironic that a film with " Independence " in the title had quite so many product placements in it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...who found it ironic that a film with "Independence" in the title had quite so many product placements in it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31692258</id>
	<title>Re:Will Smith asking for too much money?</title>
	<author>Farmer Tim</author>
	<datestamp>1270068840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Is it because Sci-Fi works well for a feature length movie but not for a serial production show with a much smaller per-hour budget?</i></p><p>That's not how it works: you can't amortise your costs across the entire length of a production run until you know how long that is, which in turn is determined by ratings. In other words, if you spent $20M on props and sets and your show only lasts six episodes, you're looking at &gt;$3.33M an episode before running costs, but if it runs four complete seasons these fixed costs are only $384,615 per episode...the problem is there's no guarantee you'll last four seasons. Commissioning editors only look at the first number ($20M), which is why they run screaming for the hills when the syllables "sci" and "fi" are used consecutively in their presence.</p><p>A movie might be more expensive, but it has a number of advantages over TV. First, TV is advertising supported, while a movie has direct revenue streams from tickets, DVDs and merchandise, so there's greater potential to make back a large investment quickly. Second, a movie doesn't have to fit schedule demographics the way a TV show does, since it doesn't need to sell advertising slots. Third, a movie doesn't rely on drawing in the same crowd week after week, so it can afford to suck (note to Michael Bay: just because it can doesn't mean it must).</p><p>Of course, the big screen is better when it comes to special effects driven claptrap, but without the sensory overload you have to rely on plot, which is also a problem for television.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it because Sci-Fi works well for a feature length movie but not for a serial production show with a much smaller per-hour budget ? That 's not how it works : you ca n't amortise your costs across the entire length of a production run until you know how long that is , which in turn is determined by ratings .
In other words , if you spent $ 20M on props and sets and your show only lasts six episodes , you 're looking at &gt; $ 3.33M an episode before running costs , but if it runs four complete seasons these fixed costs are only $ 384,615 per episode...the problem is there 's no guarantee you 'll last four seasons .
Commissioning editors only look at the first number ( $ 20M ) , which is why they run screaming for the hills when the syllables " sci " and " fi " are used consecutively in their presence.A movie might be more expensive , but it has a number of advantages over TV .
First , TV is advertising supported , while a movie has direct revenue streams from tickets , DVDs and merchandise , so there 's greater potential to make back a large investment quickly .
Second , a movie does n't have to fit schedule demographics the way a TV show does , since it does n't need to sell advertising slots .
Third , a movie does n't rely on drawing in the same crowd week after week , so it can afford to suck ( note to Michael Bay : just because it can does n't mean it must ) .Of course , the big screen is better when it comes to special effects driven claptrap , but without the sensory overload you have to rely on plot , which is also a problem for television .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it because Sci-Fi works well for a feature length movie but not for a serial production show with a much smaller per-hour budget?That's not how it works: you can't amortise your costs across the entire length of a production run until you know how long that is, which in turn is determined by ratings.
In other words, if you spent $20M on props and sets and your show only lasts six episodes, you're looking at &gt;$3.33M an episode before running costs, but if it runs four complete seasons these fixed costs are only $384,615 per episode...the problem is there's no guarantee you'll last four seasons.
Commissioning editors only look at the first number ($20M), which is why they run screaming for the hills when the syllables "sci" and "fi" are used consecutively in their presence.A movie might be more expensive, but it has a number of advantages over TV.
First, TV is advertising supported, while a movie has direct revenue streams from tickets, DVDs and merchandise, so there's greater potential to make back a large investment quickly.
Second, a movie doesn't have to fit schedule demographics the way a TV show does, since it doesn't need to sell advertising slots.
Third, a movie doesn't rely on drawing in the same crowd week after week, so it can afford to suck (note to Michael Bay: just because it can doesn't mean it must).Of course, the big screen is better when it comes to special effects driven claptrap, but without the sensory overload you have to rely on plot, which is also a problem for television.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690044</id>
	<title>ID 2 - Cleaning up the Mess!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270060140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ID 3 - Interstellar Payback Time!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ID 3 - Interstellar Payback Time !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ID 3 - Interstellar Payback Time!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687748</id>
	<title>Re:Entire Plot in 1 Slashdot Comment</title>
	<author>BrettJB</author>
	<datestamp>1270050600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Waitaminute... You clearly have more than three steps. If Jeff Goldblum is involved, there can be no step 3.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Waitaminute... You clearly have more than three steps .
If Jeff Goldblum is involved , there can be no step 3 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Waitaminute... You clearly have more than three steps.
If Jeff Goldblum is involved, there can be no step 3.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688198</id>
	<title>Re:Crap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270052220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Man, the entirely meme-based mind amuses me to no end.  At least, it'll amuse me more once <b>Hollywood misunderstands said meme</b>, assumes everyone's forgotten, and <b>makes more Matrix movies</b>, further thrashing your precious childhood memories because you thought repeating the same joke over and over again within earshot of people notorious for not understanding modern internet culture was a good idea.  Pure hilarity!  I'll just be able to sit back and laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , the entirely meme-based mind amuses me to no end .
At least , it 'll amuse me more once Hollywood misunderstands said meme , assumes everyone 's forgotten , and makes more Matrix movies , further thrashing your precious childhood memories because you thought repeating the same joke over and over again within earshot of people notorious for not understanding modern internet culture was a good idea .
Pure hilarity !
I 'll just be able to sit back and laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, the entirely meme-based mind amuses me to no end.
At least, it'll amuse me more once Hollywood misunderstands said meme, assumes everyone's forgotten, and makes more Matrix movies, further thrashing your precious childhood memories because you thought repeating the same joke over and over again within earshot of people notorious for not understanding modern internet culture was a good idea.
Pure hilarity!
I'll just be able to sit back and laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687304</id>
	<title>Reminds me of the Independence Day review</title>
	<author>clickety6</author>
	<datestamp>1270049040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can't find it now, but it was along the lines of:</p><p>"Independence Day. Aliens arrive on Earth in giant spaceships and proceed to destroy the White House.<br>However, they later turn out not top be friendly after all".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't find it now , but it was along the lines of : " Independence Day .
Aliens arrive on Earth in giant spaceships and proceed to destroy the White House.However , they later turn out not top be friendly after all " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't find it now, but it was along the lines of:"Independence Day.
Aliens arrive on Earth in giant spaceships and proceed to destroy the White House.However, they later turn out not top be friendly after all".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687298</id>
	<title>War propaganda</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270048980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's a little exercise: watch the 1938 Soviet film "Alexander Nevsky". Then watch "Independence Day".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's a little exercise : watch the 1938 Soviet film " Alexander Nevsky " .
Then watch " Independence Day " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's a little exercise: watch the 1938 Soviet film "Alexander Nevsky".
Then watch "Independence Day".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689904</id>
	<title>Re:Why do people complain...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270059600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>-It was already established that the aliens were using our computer systems, at the very least our satellite networking to communicate, it isn't a stretch</p></div><p>Yes it is.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>-It's an EFF'ING MOVIE.  It's supposed to be entertaining </p></div><p>That is the main problem most people have with it. It is supposed to be entertaining, but isn't. Since people paid to watch it, they need some entertainment value out of the movie and it sure is more entertaining to pick the movie apart, than it was watching it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>-It was already established that the aliens were using our computer systems , at the very least our satellite networking to communicate , it is n't a stretchYes it is.-It 's an EFF'ING MOVIE .
It 's supposed to be entertaining That is the main problem most people have with it .
It is supposed to be entertaining , but is n't .
Since people paid to watch it , they need some entertainment value out of the movie and it sure is more entertaining to pick the movie apart , than it was watching it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>-It was already established that the aliens were using our computer systems, at the very least our satellite networking to communicate, it isn't a stretchYes it is.-It's an EFF'ING MOVIE.
It's supposed to be entertaining That is the main problem most people have with it.
It is supposed to be entertaining, but isn't.
Since people paid to watch it, they need some entertainment value out of the movie and it sure is more entertaining to pick the movie apart, than it was watching it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689046</id>
	<title>Re:Bill Pullman</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270055880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i personally liked this scene as well.  Best presidential speech I've heard in a long time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i personally liked this scene as well .
Best presidential speech I 've heard in a long time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i personally liked this scene as well.
Best presidential speech I've heard in a long time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31695192</id>
	<title>Re:Oh dear lord.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270039080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Goldblum: "What - an advanced race like this, and the idea of passwords and encryption didn't occur to them?"</p></div><p>That doesn't work because the aliens were able to decipher and hack into the satellites. Therefore, the aliens are probably highly advanced in cryptography.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Goldblum : " What - an advanced race like this , and the idea of passwords and encryption did n't occur to them ?
" That does n't work because the aliens were able to decipher and hack into the satellites .
Therefore , the aliens are probably highly advanced in cryptography .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Goldblum: "What - an advanced race like this, and the idea of passwords and encryption didn't occur to them?
"That doesn't work because the aliens were able to decipher and hack into the satellites.
Therefore, the aliens are probably highly advanced in cryptography.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690648</id>
	<title>The aliens are back!</title>
	<author>Snaller</author>
	<datestamp>1270062600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And this time they are running Linux!</p><p>Boy are we screwed now!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And this time they are running Linux ! Boy are we screwed now !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And this time they are running Linux!Boy are we screwed now!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688612</id>
	<title>DYK that Independence Day started as stargate 2?</title>
	<author>Joe The Dragon</author>
	<datestamp>1270053900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DYK that Independence Day started as stargate 2? but That was before SG1 started.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DYK that Independence Day started as stargate 2 ?
but That was before SG1 started .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DYK that Independence Day started as stargate 2?
but That was before SG1 started.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687822</id>
	<title>Re:Foundation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270050840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Better not made at all than let George Lucas anywhere near it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Better not made at all than let George Lucas anywhere near it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better not made at all than let George Lucas anywhere near it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687832</id>
	<title>Re:Foundation</title>
	<author>dswensen</author>
	<datestamp>1270050840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, it might not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it might not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it might not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690792</id>
	<title>Re:Well timed, actually</title>
	<author>HyperQuantum</author>
	<datestamp>1270063200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In these two sequels, it will be the House of Representatives and the Senate buildings that get vaporized.</p></div><p>Not the parliament?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In these two sequels , it will be the House of Representatives and the Senate buildings that get vaporized.Not the parliament ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In these two sequels, it will be the House of Representatives and the Senate buildings that get vaporized.Not the parliament?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686708</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689142</id>
	<title>Re:Bill Pullman</title>
	<author>tokul</author>
	<datestamp>1270056240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I still consider Bill Pullman to be the greatest president of our generation.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>Let's see. Nuked own country. That's what great presidents do.

</p><p>I like Kevin Kline aka Dave Kovic more. He could balance US budget.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I still consider Bill Pullman to be the greatest president of our generation .
Let 's see .
Nuked own country .
That 's what great presidents do .
I like Kevin Kline aka Dave Kovic more .
He could balance US budget .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still consider Bill Pullman to be the greatest president of our generation.
Let's see.
Nuked own country.
That's what great presidents do.
I like Kevin Kline aka Dave Kovic more.
He could balance US budget.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686616</id>
	<title>Re:Crap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270046040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a pity they never made any sequels to that movie.<br>It was really fantastic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a pity they never made any sequels to that movie.It was really fantastic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a pity they never made any sequels to that movie.It was really fantastic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686932</id>
	<title>No no no no no.</title>
	<author>TrebleJunkie</author>
	<datestamp>1270047420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please tell me that this is an early April Fools joke?  Please?  I'm begging, here!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please tell me that this is an early April Fools joke ?
Please ? I 'm begging , here !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please tell me that this is an early April Fools joke?
Please?  I'm begging, here!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688384</id>
	<title>war of the worlds?</title>
	<author>iccaros</author>
	<datestamp>1270052940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Was Independence Day just a remaking of war of the worlds..
Aliens come to earth, kill everyone with not a word of why
Aliens are unstoppable until they are infected with  germs (virus in ID) from earth..

So will this be a remake of the war of the worlds TV show?  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War\_of\_the\_Worlds\_(TV\_series)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War\_of\_the\_Worlds\_(TV\_series)</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Was Independence Day just a remaking of war of the worlds. . Aliens come to earth , kill everyone with not a word of why Aliens are unstoppable until they are infected with germs ( virus in ID ) from earth. . So will this be a remake of the war of the worlds TV show ?
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War \ _of \ _the \ _Worlds \ _ ( TV \ _series ) [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was Independence Day just a remaking of war of the worlds..
Aliens come to earth, kill everyone with not a word of why
Aliens are unstoppable until they are infected with  germs (virus in ID) from earth..

So will this be a remake of the war of the worlds TV show?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War\_of\_the\_Worlds\_(TV\_series) [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687140</id>
	<title>Poor Dr. Okun...</title>
	<author>ultraexactzz</author>
	<datestamp>1270048380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It makes sense to revisit this story - surely every alien didn't die immediately, right? But the only story that makes sense would be some post-apocalyptic, mad-max nightmare scenario, with shades of District 9 and alien tech being used for shenanigans. Not sure what new material they'd be able to bring to the table - unless they do a prequel with the Roswell landing, which has its own challenges. <br> <br>So, so easy to screw this one up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It makes sense to revisit this story - surely every alien did n't die immediately , right ?
But the only story that makes sense would be some post-apocalyptic , mad-max nightmare scenario , with shades of District 9 and alien tech being used for shenanigans .
Not sure what new material they 'd be able to bring to the table - unless they do a prequel with the Roswell landing , which has its own challenges .
So , so easy to screw this one up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It makes sense to revisit this story - surely every alien didn't die immediately, right?
But the only story that makes sense would be some post-apocalyptic, mad-max nightmare scenario, with shades of District 9 and alien tech being used for shenanigans.
Not sure what new material they'd be able to bring to the table - unless they do a prequel with the Roswell landing, which has its own challenges.
So, so easy to screw this one up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687334</id>
	<title>Re:Will Smith asking for too much money?</title>
	<author>rugburner</author>
	<datestamp>1270049160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The original Screenplay was HG Well's war of the worlds. Where the martians die because they forget about bacteria and viruses.

Unless the sequels goto bacteria giving a helping hand. They're going to have to think up a whole new plot.

When was the last time you saw a new Hollywood movie?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The original Screenplay was HG Well 's war of the worlds .
Where the martians die because they forget about bacteria and viruses .
Unless the sequels goto bacteria giving a helping hand .
They 're going to have to think up a whole new plot .
When was the last time you saw a new Hollywood movie ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The original Screenplay was HG Well's war of the worlds.
Where the martians die because they forget about bacteria and viruses.
Unless the sequels goto bacteria giving a helping hand.
They're going to have to think up a whole new plot.
When was the last time you saw a new Hollywood movie?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689166</id>
	<title>Re:goddamnit</title>
	<author>Princeofcups</author>
	<datestamp>1270056360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Aren't there other interesting stories that could be told through the art of movies that are not stupid?</p></div><p>You obviously never saw "The Puppet Masters."  Sometimes it's worse when Hollywood has a brilliant story to start with, and completely loses any semblance of the original material.  If you are going to make mediocre movies, there's no problem starting with mediocre scripts.  A lot of Roger Corman and Hammer Studio movies come to mind.  Great entertaining films in all their cheesiness.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are n't there other interesting stories that could be told through the art of movies that are not stupid ? You obviously never saw " The Puppet Masters .
" Sometimes it 's worse when Hollywood has a brilliant story to start with , and completely loses any semblance of the original material .
If you are going to make mediocre movies , there 's no problem starting with mediocre scripts .
A lot of Roger Corman and Hammer Studio movies come to mind .
Great entertaining films in all their cheesiness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aren't there other interesting stories that could be told through the art of movies that are not stupid?You obviously never saw "The Puppet Masters.
"  Sometimes it's worse when Hollywood has a brilliant story to start with, and completely loses any semblance of the original material.
If you are going to make mediocre movies, there's no problem starting with mediocre scripts.
A lot of Roger Corman and Hammer Studio movies come to mind.
Great entertaining films in all their cheesiness.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687524</id>
	<title>Re:Entire Plot in 1 Slashdot Comment</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270049880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...which is odd because I never knew Jeff Goldblum was smart to begin with, but I digress<br>
&nbsp;</p> </div><p>Actually he wasn't until he got his genes mixed up with a housefly's.</p><p>And to the dirty-minded among you: Yes, <i>of course</i> that's how it happened.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...which is odd because I never knew Jeff Goldblum was smart to begin with , but I digress   Actually he was n't until he got his genes mixed up with a housefly 's.And to the dirty-minded among you : Yes , of course that 's how it happened .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...which is odd because I never knew Jeff Goldblum was smart to begin with, but I digress
  Actually he wasn't until he got his genes mixed up with a housefly's.And to the dirty-minded among you: Yes, of course that's how it happened.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31738260</id>
	<title>Obama Biplane</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270496880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does he do what the hero did in the first movie?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does he do what the hero did in the first movie ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does he do what the hero did in the first movie?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688736</id>
	<title>Re:Entire Plot in 1 Slashdot Comment</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270054500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, the big event will culminate on a small moon. Earth will have been mining several moons for solid fuel, with automated mining ships that load up then transport their raw material back to Earth for processing. But the aliens will have systematically attacked each of these moons and hijack the mining shuttles, until there is only one moon left. Will Smith will have to go to this moon, disguised as a prisoner that has been involuntarily volunteered for defensive flight duty, on the premise that after his (and the real prisoner's) tour is up, they will be fully pardoned.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the big event will culminate on a small moon .
Earth will have been mining several moons for solid fuel , with automated mining ships that load up then transport their raw material back to Earth for processing .
But the aliens will have systematically attacked each of these moons and hijack the mining shuttles , until there is only one moon left .
Will Smith will have to go to this moon , disguised as a prisoner that has been involuntarily volunteered for defensive flight duty , on the premise that after his ( and the real prisoner 's ) tour is up , they will be fully pardoned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the big event will culminate on a small moon.
Earth will have been mining several moons for solid fuel, with automated mining ships that load up then transport their raw material back to Earth for processing.
But the aliens will have systematically attacked each of these moons and hijack the mining shuttles, until there is only one moon left.
Will Smith will have to go to this moon, disguised as a prisoner that has been involuntarily volunteered for defensive flight duty, on the premise that after his (and the real prisoner's) tour is up, they will be fully pardoned.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688156</id>
	<title>A day early?</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1270052100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey guys, it's not April 1 yet.</p><p>*checks IMDB*</p><p>Yup, early April Fools' post; no Independence Day 2 or 3, thank GOD. However, it looks like Will Smith is working on some sci fi sequels worth considering: MIB 3 (you liked MIB - admit it!), I, Robot 2, and Hancock 2.</p><p>What I'd like to see him do though, is more zombie movies. First off, you can never have too many zombies. Secondly, he did a good job in I Am Legend.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey guys , it 's not April 1 yet .
* checks IMDB * Yup , early April Fools ' post ; no Independence Day 2 or 3 , thank GOD .
However , it looks like Will Smith is working on some sci fi sequels worth considering : MIB 3 ( you liked MIB - admit it !
) , I , Robot 2 , and Hancock 2.What I 'd like to see him do though , is more zombie movies .
First off , you can never have too many zombies .
Secondly , he did a good job in I Am Legend .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey guys, it's not April 1 yet.
*checks IMDB*Yup, early April Fools' post; no Independence Day 2 or 3, thank GOD.
However, it looks like Will Smith is working on some sci fi sequels worth considering: MIB 3 (you liked MIB - admit it!
), I, Robot 2, and Hancock 2.What I'd like to see him do though, is more zombie movies.
First off, you can never have too many zombies.
Secondly, he did a good job in I Am Legend.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687026</id>
	<title>Re:April Fools' Day?</title>
	<author>Gadget\_Guy</author>
	<datestamp>1270047780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Please let it be an early April Fools' Day joke.</p></div><p>It had already gone midnight in New Zealand when this was posted. I assumed that this marked the start of the crap day of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. that is April Fools. Are you saying that there is a chance that it might be true???</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please let it be an early April Fools ' Day joke.It had already gone midnight in New Zealand when this was posted .
I assumed that this marked the start of the crap day of / .
that is April Fools .
Are you saying that there is a chance that it might be true ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please let it be an early April Fools' Day joke.It had already gone midnight in New Zealand when this was posted.
I assumed that this marked the start of the crap day of /.
that is April Fools.
Are you saying that there is a chance that it might be true??
?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688884</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1270055160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MIB never pretended to be a serious sci-fi franchise, and it was a lot of fun to watch.</p><p>Independence Day: they tried to make it a serious sci-fi movie, but failed (see: Jeff Goldblum) . I enjoy watching it (ID4) though because it's neat to see 1996 CGI effects and what they accomplished at the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MIB never pretended to be a serious sci-fi franchise , and it was a lot of fun to watch.Independence Day : they tried to make it a serious sci-fi movie , but failed ( see : Jeff Goldblum ) .
I enjoy watching it ( ID4 ) though because it 's neat to see 1996 CGI effects and what they accomplished at the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MIB never pretended to be a serious sci-fi franchise, and it was a lot of fun to watch.Independence Day: they tried to make it a serious sci-fi movie, but failed (see: Jeff Goldblum) .
I enjoy watching it (ID4) though because it's neat to see 1996 CGI effects and what they accomplished at the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688222</id>
	<title>Re:Crap</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1270052280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except, The Matrix didn't suck. Matrix Reloaded didn't completely suck but it certainly did exhibit a high level of suck. Matrix Revolutions  is so bad I've never made it all the way through. I've had it queued up on Netflix instant play for ages, but for some reason I never try watching it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except , The Matrix did n't suck .
Matrix Reloaded did n't completely suck but it certainly did exhibit a high level of suck .
Matrix Revolutions is so bad I 've never made it all the way through .
I 've had it queued up on Netflix instant play for ages , but for some reason I never try watching it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except, The Matrix didn't suck.
Matrix Reloaded didn't completely suck but it certainly did exhibit a high level of suck.
Matrix Revolutions  is so bad I've never made it all the way through.
I've had it queued up on Netflix instant play for ages, but for some reason I never try watching it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688324</id>
	<title>Re:Good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270052700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As long as we get the sequel "Their, There, and They're".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as we get the sequel " Their , There , and They 're " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as we get the sequel "Their, There, and They're".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688746</id>
	<title>Niggers niggers niggers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270054560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>n/c</htmltext>
<tokenext>n/c</tokentext>
<sentencetext>n/c</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690598</id>
	<title>Re:Because it's the worst Sci-Fi movie ever</title>
	<author>Lars T.</author>
	<datestamp>1270062420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If a computer engineer goes back in time to the 1950's, it's a stretch, but it's possible, that he will be able to program the 50's hardware he'll see.
But if a computer engineer from the 1950's is confronted with a 2000's computer, he wouldn't have a clue what to do. And especially, he won't be able to stick a virus coded on a punchcard into the new computer!</p></div><p>Gee, why don't you show me how easy it is to program on something as bog-standard for the 50s as a <a href="http://www.pbm.com/~lindahl/mel.html" title="pbm.com" rel="nofollow">drum memory computer</a> [pbm.com]? And you are telling me Mel would have a problem with an almost picture-perfect implementation of a Von Neumann architecture?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If a computer engineer goes back in time to the 1950 's , it 's a stretch , but it 's possible , that he will be able to program the 50 's hardware he 'll see .
But if a computer engineer from the 1950 's is confronted with a 2000 's computer , he would n't have a clue what to do .
And especially , he wo n't be able to stick a virus coded on a punchcard into the new computer ! Gee , why do n't you show me how easy it is to program on something as bog-standard for the 50s as a drum memory computer [ pbm.com ] ?
And you are telling me Mel would have a problem with an almost picture-perfect implementation of a Von Neumann architecture ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a computer engineer goes back in time to the 1950's, it's a stretch, but it's possible, that he will be able to program the 50's hardware he'll see.
But if a computer engineer from the 1950's is confronted with a 2000's computer, he wouldn't have a clue what to do.
And especially, he won't be able to stick a virus coded on a punchcard into the new computer!Gee, why don't you show me how easy it is to program on something as bog-standard for the 50s as a drum memory computer [pbm.com]?
And you are telling me Mel would have a problem with an almost picture-perfect implementation of a Von Neumann architecture?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690188</id>
	<title>In this one..</title>
	<author>CosaNostra Pizza Inc</author>
	<datestamp>1270060680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In this one, the aliens come back disguised as tea-partiers who protest and plot to overthrow the government.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In this one , the aliens come back disguised as tea-partiers who protest and plot to overthrow the government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In this one, the aliens come back disguised as tea-partiers who protest and plot to overthrow the government.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689172</id>
	<title>Re:Well timed, actually</title>
	<author>operagost</author>
	<datestamp>1270056360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll assume that you're not an American and don't realize that both houses meet in the Capitol.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll assume that you 're not an American and do n't realize that both houses meet in the Capitol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll assume that you're not an American and don't realize that both houses meet in the Capitol.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686708</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31691398</id>
	<title>Re:Oh dear lord.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270065540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In addition to that, they could have even gone as far as to say that our computing and networking technology (APRANET, TCP/IP, x86 (lol), whatever) was to some extent derived from Area51's decades-long research into the alien command codes. That would have brought Goldblum's uncanny virus-writing speed into the realm of feasibility -- he would have been able to draw on existing knowledge as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In addition to that , they could have even gone as far as to say that our computing and networking technology ( APRANET , TCP/IP , x86 ( lol ) , whatever ) was to some extent derived from Area51 's decades-long research into the alien command codes .
That would have brought Goldblum 's uncanny virus-writing speed into the realm of feasibility -- he would have been able to draw on existing knowledge as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In addition to that, they could have even gone as far as to say that our computing and networking technology (APRANET, TCP/IP, x86 (lol), whatever) was to some extent derived from Area51's decades-long research into the alien command codes.
That would have brought Goldblum's uncanny virus-writing speed into the realm of feasibility -- he would have been able to draw on existing knowledge as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690012</id>
	<title>Re:Oh dear lord.</title>
	<author>Gulthek</author>
	<datestamp>1270060080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude, you're forgetting that in the context of the movie all modern computer technology was derived from the analysis of the alien spaceship.</p><p>It worked like this:</p><p>Goldblum Computer -&gt; known, prebuilt interface to alien ship -&gt; mothership -&gt; invasion fleet</p><p>No other civilization had computers? That's more of a stretch!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , you 're forgetting that in the context of the movie all modern computer technology was derived from the analysis of the alien spaceship.It worked like this : Goldblum Computer - &gt; known , prebuilt interface to alien ship - &gt; mothership - &gt; invasion fleetNo other civilization had computers ?
That 's more of a stretch !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, you're forgetting that in the context of the movie all modern computer technology was derived from the analysis of the alien spaceship.It worked like this:Goldblum Computer -&gt; known, prebuilt interface to alien ship -&gt; mothership -&gt; invasion fleetNo other civilization had computers?
That's more of a stretch!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687266</id>
	<title>Is it just me...</title>
	<author>HopefulIntern</author>
	<datestamp>1270048860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...or did Independence Day (the first one) randomly reappear in the past few months?<br> <br>

It came out when I was about 10, and it was the coolest movie* everyone had to see. I saw it when it came out on VHS to rent (my parents wouldn't take me to see it). Then it disappeared. I often wondered about it, especially the last few years after I found my model F/A-18 Hornet from the movie, complete with destructible parts. It was as if it never existed. It suddenly made a re-appearance on a Will Smith box set (*shudder*) at Sainsbury's. Now this. What happened? It was a bad movie (admittedly) then, and nothing's changed....<br> <br>

*Unrelated note: Does anyone else's Firefox spellchecker not recognise the word "movie"? Weird..</htmltext>
<tokenext>...or did Independence Day ( the first one ) randomly reappear in the past few months ?
It came out when I was about 10 , and it was the coolest movie * everyone had to see .
I saw it when it came out on VHS to rent ( my parents would n't take me to see it ) .
Then it disappeared .
I often wondered about it , especially the last few years after I found my model F/A-18 Hornet from the movie , complete with destructible parts .
It was as if it never existed .
It suddenly made a re-appearance on a Will Smith box set ( * shudder * ) at Sainsbury 's .
Now this .
What happened ?
It was a bad movie ( admittedly ) then , and nothing 's changed... . * Unrelated note : Does anyone else 's Firefox spellchecker not recognise the word " movie " ?
Weird. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...or did Independence Day (the first one) randomly reappear in the past few months?
It came out when I was about 10, and it was the coolest movie* everyone had to see.
I saw it when it came out on VHS to rent (my parents wouldn't take me to see it).
Then it disappeared.
I often wondered about it, especially the last few years after I found my model F/A-18 Hornet from the movie, complete with destructible parts.
It was as if it never existed.
It suddenly made a re-appearance on a Will Smith box set (*shudder*) at Sainsbury's.
Now this.
What happened?
It was a bad movie (admittedly) then, and nothing's changed.... 

*Unrelated note: Does anyone else's Firefox spellchecker not recognise the word "movie"?
Weird..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690976</id>
	<title>Sequel to the shittiest A rated movie ever ?</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1270063860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>well. at least when our children watches it decades later and laugh their asses off, we can say 'i was there when they filmed that movie'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>well .
at least when our children watches it decades later and laugh their asses off , we can say 'i was there when they filmed that movie'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well.
at least when our children watches it decades later and laugh their asses off, we can say 'i was there when they filmed that movie'</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687434</id>
	<title>Wait!</title>
	<author>kenp2002</author>
	<datestamp>1270049520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stop raping my childhood.err....wait hasn't been long enough yet.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stop raping my childhood.err....wait has n't been long enough yet.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stop raping my childhood.err....wait hasn't been long enough yet.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686634</id>
	<title>Oh dear lord.</title>
	<author>Pandanapper</author>
	<datestamp>1270046100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The huddled masses of special effects lovers will pay their last drop of blood to see it too.  You don't even need a storyline.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The huddled masses of special effects lovers will pay their last drop of blood to see it too .
You do n't even need a storyline .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The huddled masses of special effects lovers will pay their last drop of blood to see it too.
You don't even need a storyline.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687198</id>
	<title>Sequels</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270048620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Screw "Independence Day 2", I want "Moon 45".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Screw " Independence Day 2 " , I want " Moon 45 " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screw "Independence Day 2", I want "Moon 45".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687792</id>
	<title>Re:Good</title>
	<author>Inda</author>
	<datestamp>1270050720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd like to see a film called "Win, loose or draw?" staring Dale Winton.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like to see a film called " Win , loose or draw ?
" staring Dale Winton .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd like to see a film called "Win, loose or draw?
" staring Dale Winton.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688342</id>
	<title>Re:Foundation</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1270052760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I dont want anyone to to the foundation trilogy. Man those books were awful.<br>\</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I dont want anyone to to the foundation trilogy .
Man those books were awful. \</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dont want anyone to to the foundation trilogy.
Man those books were awful.\</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31702814</id>
	<title>ID is a guilt pleasure</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1270115220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I did watch ID at the theatre and I do own it on DVD so I've watched it once or twice over the years. It's acceptable enough to watch once in a blue moon but one sequel, let alone two, would be fucking awful.Especially since Will Smith continually gets worse, imo. I hope this is a joke.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did watch ID at the theatre and I do own it on DVD so I 've watched it once or twice over the years .
It 's acceptable enough to watch once in a blue moon but one sequel , let alone two , would be fucking awful.Especially since Will Smith continually gets worse , imo .
I hope this is a joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I did watch ID at the theatre and I do own it on DVD so I've watched it once or twice over the years.
It's acceptable enough to watch once in a blue moon but one sequel, let alone two, would be fucking awful.Especially since Will Smith continually gets worse, imo.
I hope this is a joke.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687966</id>
	<title>Re:Foundation</title>
	<author>houghi</author>
	<datestamp>1270051380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And not only him. Most SF ends up ad stuff blowing up: I, Robot; Starship Troopers; Total Recall; Minority Report just to name a few books where stuff blows up and where the books are more about social stuff then anything else.<br>That is also the reason a lot of people say they do not like SF, because it is only stuff blowing up and no story.</p><p>I understand that they would like to make movies where people only bow stuff up, but there is no reason to use a storyline and especially not ones that are good.</p><p>In the 70's many pr0n movies pretended to have a storyline. Now they are mainly a series of pr0n scenes without a story whatsoever. That should perhaps be the direction where these explosion-movies should go to. Just a series of special effects. And let people who enjoy the stories go to movies that care about the stories as well.</p><p>Current SF is just pr0n for the mind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And not only him .
Most SF ends up ad stuff blowing up : I , Robot ; Starship Troopers ; Total Recall ; Minority Report just to name a few books where stuff blows up and where the books are more about social stuff then anything else.That is also the reason a lot of people say they do not like SF , because it is only stuff blowing up and no story.I understand that they would like to make movies where people only bow stuff up , but there is no reason to use a storyline and especially not ones that are good.In the 70 's many pr0n movies pretended to have a storyline .
Now they are mainly a series of pr0n scenes without a story whatsoever .
That should perhaps be the direction where these explosion-movies should go to .
Just a series of special effects .
And let people who enjoy the stories go to movies that care about the stories as well.Current SF is just pr0n for the mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And not only him.
Most SF ends up ad stuff blowing up: I, Robot; Starship Troopers; Total Recall; Minority Report just to name a few books where stuff blows up and where the books are more about social stuff then anything else.That is also the reason a lot of people say they do not like SF, because it is only stuff blowing up and no story.I understand that they would like to make movies where people only bow stuff up, but there is no reason to use a storyline and especially not ones that are good.In the 70's many pr0n movies pretended to have a storyline.
Now they are mainly a series of pr0n scenes without a story whatsoever.
That should perhaps be the direction where these explosion-movies should go to.
Just a series of special effects.
And let people who enjoy the stories go to movies that care about the stories as well.Current SF is just pr0n for the mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686892</id>
	<title>DONGS!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270047180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><b><i> <br>
&nbsp;</i></b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext> </tokentext>
<sentencetext> 
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687030</id>
	<title>Pfft</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270047780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh fuck off, this is a lame april fool's day joke.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh fuck off , this is a lame april fool 's day joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh fuck off, this is a lame april fool's day joke.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689044</id>
	<title>Re:Oh dear lord.</title>
	<author>timholman</author>
	<datestamp>1270055820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Have to agree with you about Jeff Goldblum -- in a single afternoon -- deciphering the alien equivalent of TCP/IP and hacking up a computer virus capable of running on alien hardware. Beyond ridiculous.</p></div></blockquote><p>That was absolutely one of the most cringeworthy aspects of the movie, and they could have fixed it with a single scene.</p><p>Data:  "But it's strange - despite their formidable technology, their computer and communications networks are extremely straightforward - no encryption at all.  We've spent years reverse-engineering the command codes for their systems.  We've had a lot of success - for all the good it has done us."</p><p>Goldblum: "What - an advanced race like this, and the idea of passwords and encryption didn't occur to them?"</p><p>Pullman:  "No - they're telepaths.  They can't lie or hide anything from each other - and we're the only other advanced civilization they're ever encountered.  No other race they've destroyed had computers."</p><p>Goldblum:  "Give me everything you have on their computer systems and command codes.  I have an idea<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..."</p><p>Sure, it would have still been a stretch, but a lot easier to swallow.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have to agree with you about Jeff Goldblum -- in a single afternoon -- deciphering the alien equivalent of TCP/IP and hacking up a computer virus capable of running on alien hardware .
Beyond ridiculous.That was absolutely one of the most cringeworthy aspects of the movie , and they could have fixed it with a single scene.Data : " But it 's strange - despite their formidable technology , their computer and communications networks are extremely straightforward - no encryption at all .
We 've spent years reverse-engineering the command codes for their systems .
We 've had a lot of success - for all the good it has done us .
" Goldblum : " What - an advanced race like this , and the idea of passwords and encryption did n't occur to them ?
" Pullman : " No - they 're telepaths .
They ca n't lie or hide anything from each other - and we 're the only other advanced civilization they 're ever encountered .
No other race they 've destroyed had computers .
" Goldblum : " Give me everything you have on their computer systems and command codes .
I have an idea ... " Sure , it would have still been a stretch , but a lot easier to swallow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have to agree with you about Jeff Goldblum -- in a single afternoon -- deciphering the alien equivalent of TCP/IP and hacking up a computer virus capable of running on alien hardware.
Beyond ridiculous.That was absolutely one of the most cringeworthy aspects of the movie, and they could have fixed it with a single scene.Data:  "But it's strange - despite their formidable technology, their computer and communications networks are extremely straightforward - no encryption at all.
We've spent years reverse-engineering the command codes for their systems.
We've had a lot of success - for all the good it has done us.
"Goldblum: "What - an advanced race like this, and the idea of passwords and encryption didn't occur to them?
"Pullman:  "No - they're telepaths.
They can't lie or hide anything from each other - and we're the only other advanced civilization they're ever encountered.
No other race they've destroyed had computers.
"Goldblum:  "Give me everything you have on their computer systems and command codes.
I have an idea ..."Sure, it would have still been a stretch, but a lot easier to swallow.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688512</id>
	<title>Obama Flying</title>
	<author>DakotaSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1270053420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm down with Obama flying a biplane as long as they recreate Randy Quaid's fate.  Be the first time the little statist ever did anything useful with his life.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm down with Obama flying a biplane as long as they recreate Randy Quaid 's fate .
Be the first time the little statist ever did anything useful with his life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm down with Obama flying a biplane as long as they recreate Randy Quaid's fate.
Be the first time the little statist ever did anything useful with his life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687758</id>
	<title>Aprils Fools Day...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270050660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is tomorrow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is tomorrow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is tomorrow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689584</id>
	<title>Re:Entire Plot in 1 Slashdot Comment</title>
	<author>Syberz</author>
	<datestamp>1270058220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should get David Duchovny to play Jeff Goldblum, he was awesome in Celebrity Jeopardy on SNL.</p><p>I'd add a youtube link but the site's blocked at the office.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should get David Duchovny to play Jeff Goldblum , he was awesome in Celebrity Jeopardy on SNL.I 'd add a youtube link but the site 's blocked at the office .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should get David Duchovny to play Jeff Goldblum, he was awesome in Celebrity Jeopardy on SNL.I'd add a youtube link but the site's blocked at the office.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690054</id>
	<title>Re:goddamnit</title>
	<author>CosaNostra Pizza Inc</author>
	<datestamp>1270060200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ring World is something I'd like to see.  Other movies that could potentially be very good if redone RIGHT:  Philip Jose Farmer's "Riverworld" series, L Ron Hubbard's Battlefield Earth.  There was a Riverworld miniseries on the SyFy channel a few years back but it was a horrible, loose adaption of the novels.  Battlefield Earth was an awesome novel.  L Ron Hubbard may have been a whackjob cult leader but this novel was a science fiction masterpiece.  Too bad the 2000 movie of the same name was such a poor adaption with lousy effects and hammy acting.

Other movies I'd like to see:  Ender's Game, Childhood's End, Neuromancer, The Man in the High Castle,</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ring World is something I 'd like to see .
Other movies that could potentially be very good if redone RIGHT : Philip Jose Farmer 's " Riverworld " series , L Ron Hubbard 's Battlefield Earth .
There was a Riverworld miniseries on the SyFy channel a few years back but it was a horrible , loose adaption of the novels .
Battlefield Earth was an awesome novel .
L Ron Hubbard may have been a whackjob cult leader but this novel was a science fiction masterpiece .
Too bad the 2000 movie of the same name was such a poor adaption with lousy effects and hammy acting .
Other movies I 'd like to see : Ender 's Game , Childhood 's End , Neuromancer , The Man in the High Castle,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ring World is something I'd like to see.
Other movies that could potentially be very good if redone RIGHT:  Philip Jose Farmer's "Riverworld" series, L Ron Hubbard's Battlefield Earth.
There was a Riverworld miniseries on the SyFy channel a few years back but it was a horrible, loose adaption of the novels.
Battlefield Earth was an awesome novel.
L Ron Hubbard may have been a whackjob cult leader but this novel was a science fiction masterpiece.
Too bad the 2000 movie of the same name was such a poor adaption with lousy effects and hammy acting.
Other movies I'd like to see:  Ender's Game, Childhood's End, Neuromancer, The Man in the High Castle,</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688204</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>RMingin</author>
	<datestamp>1270052220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>JESUS, dude! SPOILERS!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>JESUS , dude !
SPOILERS !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>JESUS, dude!
SPOILERS!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686912</id>
	<title>Re:Will Smith asking for too much money?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270047300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bitter much?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bitter much ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bitter much?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687078</id>
	<title>proximity to 9-11</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1270048080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I recall being unable to watch that movie without  a lump in my stomach for a few months after 9-11.  The urban destruction scenes were too close to the mark. Doesnt both now that Los Angeles or New York is now destroyed in every apocalyptic movie.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I recall being unable to watch that movie without a lump in my stomach for a few months after 9-11 .
The urban destruction scenes were too close to the mark .
Doesnt both now that Los Angeles or New York is now destroyed in every apocalyptic movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I recall being unable to watch that movie without  a lump in my stomach for a few months after 9-11.
The urban destruction scenes were too close to the mark.
Doesnt both now that Los Angeles or New York is now destroyed in every apocalyptic movie.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687488</id>
	<title>sffmedia.com is blocked at my office!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270049700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>
Sites get blocked here usually for:<br> <br>
- wanton unexpurgated naughtiness<br>
- social networking<br>
- you can send messages through it<br>
- its a known fount for frauds, trojan horses, etc. etc.<br>
<br>
Do any of the above apply?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sites get blocked here usually for : - wanton unexpurgated naughtiness - social networking - you can send messages through it - its a known fount for frauds , trojan horses , etc .
etc . Do any of the above apply ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Sites get blocked here usually for: 
- wanton unexpurgated naughtiness
- social networking
- you can send messages through it
- its a known fount for frauds, trojan horses, etc.
etc.

Do any of the above apply?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686662</id>
	<title>Re:Crap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270046220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You mean parts 2 and 3 will also make a complete mockery of the first part? And, in this case, not suck?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean parts 2 and 3 will also make a complete mockery of the first part ?
And , in this case , not suck ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean parts 2 and 3 will also make a complete mockery of the first part?
And, in this case, not suck?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31693100</id>
	<title>Re:Once you seen one Roland Emmerich</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1270028640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What creative person??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What creative person ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What creative person?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688190</id>
	<title>Re:Why do people complain...</title>
	<author>IDtheTarget</author>
	<datestamp>1270052160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just want to know how much apple paid for that advertisement....<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just want to know how much apple paid for that advertisement.... : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just want to know how much apple paid for that advertisement.... :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687664</id>
	<title>Bill Pullman</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270050360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>For everyone bashing Will Smith. He's the most popular actor around right now. There are several movie critics who stopped publishing reviews for his movies because what they say doesn't matter. Everyone's going to go see it anyway, because it's a Will Smith movie.
<br> <br>
I still consider Bill Pullman to be the greatest president of our generation.
<br> <br> <b>
Good morning. In less than an hour, aircraft from here will join others from around the world. And you will be launching the largest aerial battle in this history of mankind.
<br> <br>
Mankind -- that word should have new meaning for all of us today.
<br> <br>
We can't be consumed by our petty differences anymore.
<br> <br>
We will be united in our common interests.
<br> <br>
Perhaps its fate that today is the 4th of July, and you will once again be fighting for our freedom, not from tyranny, oppression, or persecution -- but from annihilation.
<br> <br>
We're fighting for our right to live, to exist.
<br> <br>
And should we win the day, the 4th of July will no longer be known as an American holiday, but as the day when the world declared in one voice:
<br> <br>
"We will not go quietly into the night!
<br> <br>
We will not vanish without a fight!
<br> <br>
We're going to live on!
<br> <br>
We're going to survive!"
<br> <br>
Today, we celebrate our Independence Day!</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>For everyone bashing Will Smith .
He 's the most popular actor around right now .
There are several movie critics who stopped publishing reviews for his movies because what they say does n't matter .
Everyone 's going to go see it anyway , because it 's a Will Smith movie .
I still consider Bill Pullman to be the greatest president of our generation .
Good morning .
In less than an hour , aircraft from here will join others from around the world .
And you will be launching the largest aerial battle in this history of mankind .
Mankind -- that word should have new meaning for all of us today .
We ca n't be consumed by our petty differences anymore .
We will be united in our common interests .
Perhaps its fate that today is the 4th of July , and you will once again be fighting for our freedom , not from tyranny , oppression , or persecution -- but from annihilation .
We 're fighting for our right to live , to exist .
And should we win the day , the 4th of July will no longer be known as an American holiday , but as the day when the world declared in one voice : " We will not go quietly into the night !
We will not vanish without a fight !
We 're going to live on !
We 're going to survive !
" Today , we celebrate our Independence Day !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For everyone bashing Will Smith.
He's the most popular actor around right now.
There are several movie critics who stopped publishing reviews for his movies because what they say doesn't matter.
Everyone's going to go see it anyway, because it's a Will Smith movie.
I still consider Bill Pullman to be the greatest president of our generation.
Good morning.
In less than an hour, aircraft from here will join others from around the world.
And you will be launching the largest aerial battle in this history of mankind.
Mankind -- that word should have new meaning for all of us today.
We can't be consumed by our petty differences anymore.
We will be united in our common interests.
Perhaps its fate that today is the 4th of July, and you will once again be fighting for our freedom, not from tyranny, oppression, or persecution -- but from annihilation.
We're fighting for our right to live, to exist.
And should we win the day, the 4th of July will no longer be known as an American holiday, but as the day when the world declared in one voice:
 
"We will not go quietly into the night!
We will not vanish without a fight!
We're going to live on!
We're going to survive!
"
 
Today, we celebrate our Independence Day!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686672</id>
	<title>Re:Crap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270046220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It will be the matrix all over again....</p></div><p>The matrix was a fine piece of garbage, just like spiderman(1-3), terminator(4), alien/predator(*), rocky(1-99), rambo(*) and even movies with the word "movie" in it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It will be the matrix all over again....The matrix was a fine piece of garbage , just like spiderman ( 1-3 ) , terminator ( 4 ) , alien/predator ( * ) , rocky ( 1-99 ) , rambo ( * ) and even movies with the word " movie " in it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will be the matrix all over again....The matrix was a fine piece of garbage, just like spiderman(1-3), terminator(4), alien/predator(*), rocky(1-99), rambo(*) and even movies with the word "movie" in it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688292</id>
	<title>Re:Good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270052580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I would also like to see "You, Your and You're", a romantic comedy starring Jennifer Aniston <b>AND</b> Sandra Bullock.</p></div><p>FTFY, much better in my opinion, might even pay the premium to see that in 3D</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would also like to see " You , Your and You 're " , a romantic comedy starring Jennifer Aniston AND Sandra Bullock.FTFY , much better in my opinion , might even pay the premium to see that in 3D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would also like to see "You, Your and You're", a romantic comedy starring Jennifer Aniston AND Sandra Bullock.FTFY, much better in my opinion, might even pay the premium to see that in 3D
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31694136</id>
	<title>Titles &amp; plot summaries have also been release</title>
	<author>dragonworks2050</author>
	<datestamp>1270033620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The first sequel will be <b>"Labor Day"</b> in which the surviving residents of Earth must overcome their differences and work together to fight the invaders.

The second sequel will be <b>"Columbus Day"</b> in which Will Smith must convince the others to follow him on an intergalactic voyage to find a new habitable planet fit for human conquest.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The first sequel will be " Labor Day " in which the surviving residents of Earth must overcome their differences and work together to fight the invaders .
The second sequel will be " Columbus Day " in which Will Smith must convince the others to follow him on an intergalactic voyage to find a new habitable planet fit for human conquest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first sequel will be "Labor Day" in which the surviving residents of Earth must overcome their differences and work together to fight the invaders.
The second sequel will be "Columbus Day" in which Will Smith must convince the others to follow him on an intergalactic voyage to find a new habitable planet fit for human conquest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687426</id>
	<title>victory cigar anyone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270049520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>victory cigar anyone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>victory cigar anyone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>victory cigar anyone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854</id>
	<title>Good</title>
	<author>benbean</author>
	<datestamp>1270047000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If for no other reason than the attendant publicity might finally teach the people of the Internet how to correctly spell "independence".</p><p>I would also like to see "You, Your and You're", a romantic comedy starring Jennifer Aniston or Sandra Bullock.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If for no other reason than the attendant publicity might finally teach the people of the Internet how to correctly spell " independence " .I would also like to see " You , Your and You 're " , a romantic comedy starring Jennifer Aniston or Sandra Bullock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If for no other reason than the attendant publicity might finally teach the people of the Internet how to correctly spell "independence".I would also like to see "You, Your and You're", a romantic comedy starring Jennifer Aniston or Sandra Bullock.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690412</id>
	<title>Re:Bill Pullman</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270061760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I absolutely love that speech and get goosebumps everytime I hear it, even then just reading it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I absolutely love that speech and get goosebumps everytime I hear it , even then just reading it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I absolutely love that speech and get goosebumps everytime I hear it, even then just reading it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689230</id>
	<title>Re:Why do people complain...</title>
	<author>Princeofcups</author>
	<datestamp>1270056660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I really hate the complaints over the ending of Independence Day.</p></div><p>Agreed.  Where's the rage over the flaws in Star Wars and Star Trek?  It's probably just the typical hate-what's-popular schtick.  Somehow only liking obscure material makes one feel more geeky, or something.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really hate the complaints over the ending of Independence Day.Agreed .
Where 's the rage over the flaws in Star Wars and Star Trek ?
It 's probably just the typical hate-what 's-popular schtick .
Somehow only liking obscure material makes one feel more geeky , or something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really hate the complaints over the ending of Independence Day.Agreed.
Where's the rage over the flaws in Star Wars and Star Trek?
It's probably just the typical hate-what's-popular schtick.
Somehow only liking obscure material makes one feel more geeky, or something.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687086</id>
	<title>ZoneAlarm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270048140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope this time the aliens have learned to use a firewall in their mothership.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope this time the aliens have learned to use a firewall in their mothership .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope this time the aliens have learned to use a firewall in their mothership.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686888</id>
	<title>With an iPad... with Obama?</title>
	<author>MikeRT</author>
	<datestamp>1270047180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would it be too much to ask of them to make the explanation for the story be that humans spent the last 10-15 years reverse engineering their technology and now understand it enough to make a weapons that can penetrate their shields and destroy their ships?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would it be too much to ask of them to make the explanation for the story be that humans spent the last 10-15 years reverse engineering their technology and now understand it enough to make a weapons that can penetrate their shields and destroy their ships ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would it be too much to ask of them to make the explanation for the story be that humans spent the last 10-15 years reverse engineering their technology and now understand it enough to make a weapons that can penetrate their shields and destroy their ships?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686874</id>
	<title>Bill Pullman anyone?</title>
	<author>GPLDAN</author>
	<datestamp>1270047120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Come on... you forgot Bill Pullman as the kick-ass Fighter Pilot President. His role was so influential, GW Bush actually mimicked the role!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on... you forgot Bill Pullman as the kick-ass Fighter Pilot President .
His role was so influential , GW Bush actually mimicked the role !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on... you forgot Bill Pullman as the kick-ass Fighter Pilot President.
His role was so influential, GW Bush actually mimicked the role!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688836</id>
	<title>Re:What the Matrix sequels should have been</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270054980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please, never, ever, ever write anything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please , never , ever , ever write anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please, never, ever, ever write anything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686728</id>
	<title>Re:Will Smith asking for too much money?</title>
	<author>Ubergrendle</author>
	<datestamp>1270046460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm fairly certain when no one bittorents these movies, the MPAA will credit it to a) advances in DRM, or b) creating a big budget 3D theatre experience that can't be recreated at home. In reality, it will be because a hole in the space time continuum will be ripped open through the collasal gravity well of SUCK.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm fairly certain when no one bittorents these movies , the MPAA will credit it to a ) advances in DRM , or b ) creating a big budget 3D theatre experience that ca n't be recreated at home .
In reality , it will be because a hole in the space time continuum will be ripped open through the collasal gravity well of SUCK .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm fairly certain when no one bittorents these movies, the MPAA will credit it to a) advances in DRM, or b) creating a big budget 3D theatre experience that can't be recreated at home.
In reality, it will be because a hole in the space time continuum will be ripped open through the collasal gravity well of SUCK.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686716</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>edittard</author>
	<datestamp>1270046400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Queue the continued nerd rage in 3...2...1...</p></div></blockquote><p>Righto.  Should we form the line to the left or the right?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Queue the continued nerd rage in 3...2...1...Righto .
Should we form the line to the left or the right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Queue the continued nerd rage in 3...2...1...Righto.
Should we form the line to the left or the right?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688824</id>
	<title>Re:Good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270054920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I would also like to see "You, Your and You're", a romantic comedy starring Jennifer Aniston or Sandra Bullock."</p><p>And "There, Their and They're", a horror film starring... oh, what the hell<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... also starring Jennifer Aniston or Sandra Bullock.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I would also like to see " You , Your and You 're " , a romantic comedy starring Jennifer Aniston or Sandra Bullock .
" And " There , Their and They 're " , a horror film starring... oh , what the hell ... also starring Jennifer Aniston or Sandra Bullock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I would also like to see "You, Your and You're", a romantic comedy starring Jennifer Aniston or Sandra Bullock.
"And "There, Their and They're", a horror film starring... oh, what the hell ... also starring Jennifer Aniston or Sandra Bullock.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686624</id>
	<title>Not bad....</title>
	<author>vikingpower</author>
	<datestamp>1270046100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...for an early 1st-of-April prank....</htmltext>
<tokenext>...for an early 1st-of-April prank... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...for an early 1st-of-April prank....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687368</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Dr\_Barnowl</author>
	<datestamp>1270049280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not inconceivable that such a civilization would split periodically ; they're obviously in love with the idea of unsustainable growth, or they would presumably just get ahold of their birth rate and settle down on some world or even an artificial habitat.</p><p>Of course, it could just be a different hostile alien civilization. It would be nice to explore different dynamics of trying to take over the earth. Of course, this is Roland Emmerich we're talking about. Lots of Boom Boom Pow for sure...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not inconceivable that such a civilization would split periodically ; they 're obviously in love with the idea of unsustainable growth , or they would presumably just get ahold of their birth rate and settle down on some world or even an artificial habitat.Of course , it could just be a different hostile alien civilization .
It would be nice to explore different dynamics of trying to take over the earth .
Of course , this is Roland Emmerich we 're talking about .
Lots of Boom Boom Pow for sure.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not inconceivable that such a civilization would split periodically ; they're obviously in love with the idea of unsustainable growth, or they would presumably just get ahold of their birth rate and settle down on some world or even an artificial habitat.Of course, it could just be a different hostile alien civilization.
It would be nice to explore different dynamics of trying to take over the earth.
Of course, this is Roland Emmerich we're talking about.
Lots of Boom Boom Pow for sure...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31696380</id>
	<title>Beacuse they couldn't get the tech straight.</title>
	<author>Ungrounded Lightning</author>
	<datestamp>1270047420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Seriously, why do movies generate so much nerd rage?</i></p><p>Because they never get the tech straight and it blows the "willing suspension of disbelief" needed to enjoy the films - after you've paid all this money on the promise you will be entertained.</p><p>Examples from Independence Day:</p><p>
&nbsp; - The mother ship is a quarter the mass of the moon and they put it in near Earth orbit without cracking the planet open with tides, making significant changes in the orbits of the Earth and Moon, or even causing noticeable tidal disruption of the Earth's shipping.</p><p>
&nbsp; - They can cross interstellar space with a fleet but have to crack into our comsats to get a signal to the other side of the planet?  They never heard of using one of their OWN ships for a relay, or directional antennas, or even moonbounce?</p><p>
&nbsp; - Their entire network is susceptible to a Macintosh worm?  If there's ONE THING that is technology specific and guaranteed not to operate on a separately-designed computer built by people from another planet with no previous contact with Earth. it's a worm.  What did these guys do?  Steal the plans from Woz and Jobs?  GIVE the plans to Woz and Jobs?</p><p>Gimmie a break.</p><p>= = = =</p><p>I understand that one thing which surprised the filmmakers was the audience reaction when the aliens blasted the Whitehouse:  A standing ovation!  (During the Clinton years no less.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , why do movies generate so much nerd rage ? Because they never get the tech straight and it blows the " willing suspension of disbelief " needed to enjoy the films - after you 've paid all this money on the promise you will be entertained.Examples from Independence Day :   - The mother ship is a quarter the mass of the moon and they put it in near Earth orbit without cracking the planet open with tides , making significant changes in the orbits of the Earth and Moon , or even causing noticeable tidal disruption of the Earth 's shipping .
  - They can cross interstellar space with a fleet but have to crack into our comsats to get a signal to the other side of the planet ?
They never heard of using one of their OWN ships for a relay , or directional antennas , or even moonbounce ?
  - Their entire network is susceptible to a Macintosh worm ?
If there 's ONE THING that is technology specific and guaranteed not to operate on a separately-designed computer built by people from another planet with no previous contact with Earth .
it 's a worm .
What did these guys do ?
Steal the plans from Woz and Jobs ?
GIVE the plans to Woz and Jobs ? Gimmie a break. = = = = I understand that one thing which surprised the filmmakers was the audience reaction when the aliens blasted the Whitehouse : A standing ovation !
( During the Clinton years no less .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, why do movies generate so much nerd rage?Because they never get the tech straight and it blows the "willing suspension of disbelief" needed to enjoy the films - after you've paid all this money on the promise you will be entertained.Examples from Independence Day:
  - The mother ship is a quarter the mass of the moon and they put it in near Earth orbit without cracking the planet open with tides, making significant changes in the orbits of the Earth and Moon, or even causing noticeable tidal disruption of the Earth's shipping.
  - They can cross interstellar space with a fleet but have to crack into our comsats to get a signal to the other side of the planet?
They never heard of using one of their OWN ships for a relay, or directional antennas, or even moonbounce?
  - Their entire network is susceptible to a Macintosh worm?
If there's ONE THING that is technology specific and guaranteed not to operate on a separately-designed computer built by people from another planet with no previous contact with Earth.
it's a worm.
What did these guys do?
Steal the plans from Woz and Jobs?
GIVE the plans to Woz and Jobs?Gimmie a break.= = = =I understand that one thing which surprised the filmmakers was the audience reaction when the aliens blasted the Whitehouse:  A standing ovation!
(During the Clinton years no less.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688642</id>
	<title>Re:Will Smith asking for too much money?</title>
	<author>afidel</author>
	<datestamp>1270054020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Sci-Fi films bacause 8 of the top 10 grossing movies are Sci-Fi</i> <br> <br>Which brings up a very good point, why do the major networks hate Sci-Fi so much? Is it because Sci-Fi works well for a feature length movie but not for a serial production show with a much smaller per-hour budget?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sci-Fi films bacause 8 of the top 10 grossing movies are Sci-Fi Which brings up a very good point , why do the major networks hate Sci-Fi so much ?
Is it because Sci-Fi works well for a feature length movie but not for a serial production show with a much smaller per-hour budget ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sci-Fi films bacause 8 of the top 10 grossing movies are Sci-Fi  Which brings up a very good point, why do the major networks hate Sci-Fi so much?
Is it because Sci-Fi works well for a feature length movie but not for a serial production show with a much smaller per-hour budget?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689196</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270056480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It was a movie, made to entertain the masses.</p></div></blockquote><p>So were the LOTR movies and they were excellent.  "It's made for the masses" is not an excuse to suck.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was a movie , made to entertain the masses.So were the LOTR movies and they were excellent .
" It 's made for the masses " is not an excuse to suck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was a movie, made to entertain the masses.So were the LOTR movies and they were excellent.
"It's made for the masses" is not an excuse to suck.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687946</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>grumpyman</author>
	<datestamp>1270051320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>May be because it's an American-centric story on a single heroic character kick the thousands of hero just by himself?  I'm not a star\_xxxx fanboy at all and I don't know if this movie or star war 1 was worse...</htmltext>
<tokenext>May be because it 's an American-centric story on a single heroic character kick the thousands of hero just by himself ?
I 'm not a star \ _xxxx fanboy at all and I do n't know if this movie or star war 1 was worse.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>May be because it's an American-centric story on a single heroic character kick the thousands of hero just by himself?
I'm not a star\_xxxx fanboy at all and I don't know if this movie or star war 1 was worse...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687022</id>
	<title>meh</title>
	<author>JackSpratts</author>
	<datestamp>1270047780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>could live without both smith and emmerich. would like to see goldblum though. but hey, since we're dreaming, how about a sequel to buckaroo bonzai there bigboot?</p><p>bigboo<i> <b>tay</b> </i> </p><p> - js.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>could live without both smith and emmerich .
would like to see goldblum though .
but hey , since we 're dreaming , how about a sequel to buckaroo bonzai there bigboot ? bigboo tay - js .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>could live without both smith and emmerich.
would like to see goldblum though.
but hey, since we're dreaming, how about a sequel to buckaroo bonzai there bigboot?bigboo tay   - js.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686802</id>
	<title>At first I thought...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270046820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...it was an early April's Fool's Day joke<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...it was an early April 's Fool 's Day joke ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...it was an early April's Fool's Day joke ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31691336</id>
	<title>Re:Oh dear lord.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270065300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even if they had written a scene like that, it'd probably get cut to make way for more action scenes. If you're lucky it might make it to the "deleted scenes".</p><p>Sounds like it would have been a pretty good explanation though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if they had written a scene like that , it 'd probably get cut to make way for more action scenes .
If you 're lucky it might make it to the " deleted scenes " .Sounds like it would have been a pretty good explanation though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if they had written a scene like that, it'd probably get cut to make way for more action scenes.
If you're lucky it might make it to the "deleted scenes".Sounds like it would have been a pretty good explanation though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688242</id>
	<title>Re:Will Smith asking for too much money?</title>
	<author>terjeber</author>
	<datestamp>1270052400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not sure I'd suffer through two sequels of the <b>worst sci-fi movie ever</b> just to help Smith with acting classes and Emmerich becoming a mediocre director (which is all he could ever aspire to be, no matter how much training).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not sure I 'd suffer through two sequels of the worst sci-fi movie ever just to help Smith with acting classes and Emmerich becoming a mediocre director ( which is all he could ever aspire to be , no matter how much training ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not sure I'd suffer through two sequels of the worst sci-fi movie ever just to help Smith with acting classes and Emmerich becoming a mediocre director (which is all he could ever aspire to be, no matter how much training).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31694472</id>
	<title>wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270035420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>just wow. well done. send this man to hollywood, pay him whatever he wants.</p><p>For your next trick, can you fix thermodynamics in the Matrix?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>just wow .
well done .
send this man to hollywood , pay him whatever he wants.For your next trick , can you fix thermodynamics in the Matrix ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just wow.
well done.
send this man to hollywood, pay him whatever he wants.For your next trick, can you fix thermodynamics in the Matrix?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687262</id>
	<title>I have a confession to make</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270048860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I actually like Will Smith. I liked Independence Day. I liked Men In Black. I liked Fresh Prince of Bel-Air. He's a fun actor. How can you hate that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I actually like Will Smith .
I liked Independence Day .
I liked Men In Black .
I liked Fresh Prince of Bel-Air .
He 's a fun actor .
How can you hate that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I actually like Will Smith.
I liked Independence Day.
I liked Men In Black.
I liked Fresh Prince of Bel-Air.
He's a fun actor.
How can you hate that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31693070</id>
	<title>Re:goddamnit</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1270028520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Can't they finally shoot the Ring World or something like that with the same Will Smith as the main character?<br>Jesus holly fucker.</p></div><p>Oh god. I read that as &ldquo;Right Wing World. *shivers*!</p><p>But you must know, that for the business people, everything revolves around an imaginary concept called &ldquo;IP&rdquo;. And they want to milk every &ldquo;IP&rdquo; for as long as possible, before risking something new. Which usually means: Until the whole population completely and utterly hates it!</p><p>I think making art a business in just plain wrong. And &ldquo;IP&rdquo; is disgusting and perverse.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't they finally shoot the Ring World or something like that with the same Will Smith as the main character ? Jesus holly fucker.Oh god .
I read that as    Right Wing World .
* shivers * ! But you must know , that for the business people , everything revolves around an imaginary concept called    IP    .
And they want to milk every    IP    for as long as possible , before risking something new .
Which usually means : Until the whole population completely and utterly hates it ! I think making art a business in just plain wrong .
And    IP    is disgusting and perverse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't they finally shoot the Ring World or something like that with the same Will Smith as the main character?Jesus holly fucker.Oh god.
I read that as “Right Wing World.
*shivers*!But you must know, that for the business people, everything revolves around an imaginary concept called “IP”.
And they want to milk every “IP” for as long as possible, before risking something new.
Which usually means: Until the whole population completely and utterly hates it!I think making art a business in just plain wrong.
And “IP” is disgusting and perverse.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689388</id>
	<title>Re:Naming Technicality</title>
	<author>Bassman59</author>
	<datestamp>1270057380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Independence Day 2: The Heretic.</p><p>Independence Day 3D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Independence Day 2 : The Heretic.Independence Day 3D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Independence Day 2: The Heretic.Independence Day 3D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686904</id>
	<title>Re:Foundation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270047300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It might be better that it's made by him than not made at all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It might be better that it 's made by him than not made at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It might be better that it's made by him than not made at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687306</id>
	<title>Re:Naming Technicality</title>
	<author>HopefulIntern</author>
	<datestamp>1270049040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In other news, Born on the Fourth of July 2: Born on the 5th of July is promised to be even more fourth-of-july'y, says director Oliver Stone. A dangerously insane human being.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In other news , Born on the Fourth of July 2 : Born on the 5th of July is promised to be even more fourth-of-july'y , says director Oliver Stone .
A dangerously insane human being .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other news, Born on the Fourth of July 2: Born on the 5th of July is promised to be even more fourth-of-july'y, says director Oliver Stone.
A dangerously insane human being.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688584</id>
	<title>Let's hope the Aliens are smart enough to attack..</title>
	<author>MXPS</author>
	<datestamp>1270053780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>on a different holiday this time around. Rosh Hashanah or Mothers's Day would be so much better for me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>on a different holiday this time around .
Rosh Hashanah or Mothers 's Day would be so much better for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>on a different holiday this time around.
Rosh Hashanah or Mothers's Day would be so much better for me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687802</id>
	<title>Re:Once you seen one Roland Emmerich</title>
	<author>BurtCrep</author>
	<datestamp>1270050720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mainstream films are not made by creative people, they're made by business people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mainstream films are not made by creative people , they 're made by business people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mainstream films are not made by creative people, they're made by business people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686720</id>
	<title>Plot?</title>
	<author>MadDogX</author>
	<datestamp>1270046400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would really like to know what the sequels will be about. I mean, at the end of the first one the "entire civilization" of evil aliens was defeated and the planet was littered with dozens of crashed city killer ships. Oh wait, I can see it now:

"Independence Day 2: The Great Spring Cleaning"

That shit's gonna take a while to clear up, I tell you. Maybe they should bring in WALL-E and his pals.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would really like to know what the sequels will be about .
I mean , at the end of the first one the " entire civilization " of evil aliens was defeated and the planet was littered with dozens of crashed city killer ships .
Oh wait , I can see it now : " Independence Day 2 : The Great Spring Cleaning " That shit 's gon na take a while to clear up , I tell you .
Maybe they should bring in WALL-E and his pals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would really like to know what the sequels will be about.
I mean, at the end of the first one the "entire civilization" of evil aliens was defeated and the planet was littered with dozens of crashed city killer ships.
Oh wait, I can see it now:

"Independence Day 2: The Great Spring Cleaning"

That shit's gonna take a while to clear up, I tell you.
Maybe they should bring in WALL-E and his pals.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689284</id>
	<title>how sad it is...</title>
	<author>macbeth66</author>
	<datestamp>1270056960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>when the editors comments are funnier than anything, anyone else has come with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>when the editors comments are funnier than anything , anyone else has come with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>when the editors comments are funnier than anything, anyone else has come with.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688676</id>
	<title>Re:Will Smith asking for too much money?</title>
	<author>BoogeyOfTheMan</author>
	<datestamp>1270054200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember seeing an interview of Smith's a few months after ID4 came out where he said something like "Before this movie, people would see me on the street and say 'Hey Will, can I get a pic/autograph' after the movie I get 'Excuse me Mr. Smith, can I trouble you for an autograph?'"</p><p>The way he said it with his facial expression though had me laughing.</p><p>I have to say though that I was 16 when ID4 came out, I waited in line to see it on opening day and I loved it. Sure it had a crappy plot, but I wasnt there for plot, I wanted to see lots of special effects and I was not disapointed on that front. (I was also with a girl I had a crush on for 6mo and we hooked up that night, so that may color my fond memories a little<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember seeing an interview of Smith 's a few months after ID4 came out where he said something like " Before this movie , people would see me on the street and say 'Hey Will , can I get a pic/autograph ' after the movie I get 'Excuse me Mr. Smith , can I trouble you for an autograph ?
' " The way he said it with his facial expression though had me laughing.I have to say though that I was 16 when ID4 came out , I waited in line to see it on opening day and I loved it .
Sure it had a crappy plot , but I wasnt there for plot , I wanted to see lots of special effects and I was not disapointed on that front .
( I was also with a girl I had a crush on for 6mo and we hooked up that night , so that may color my fond memories a little ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember seeing an interview of Smith's a few months after ID4 came out where he said something like "Before this movie, people would see me on the street and say 'Hey Will, can I get a pic/autograph' after the movie I get 'Excuse me Mr. Smith, can I trouble you for an autograph?
'"The way he said it with his facial expression though had me laughing.I have to say though that I was 16 when ID4 came out, I waited in line to see it on opening day and I loved it.
Sure it had a crappy plot, but I wasnt there for plot, I wanted to see lots of special effects and I was not disapointed on that front.
(I was also with a girl I had a crush on for 6mo and we hooked up that night, so that may color my fond memories a little ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31694176</id>
	<title>Re:goddamnit</title>
	<author>spitzak</author>
	<datestamp>1270033800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I seem to remember Larry Niven saying in response to "will somebody ever make a Ringworld movie?" something like "I hope not. Right now I get a big payment every time one studio sells the rights to another, and that would stop if the movie ever got made".</p><p>Anybody know if this quip is true?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I seem to remember Larry Niven saying in response to " will somebody ever make a Ringworld movie ?
" something like " I hope not .
Right now I get a big payment every time one studio sells the rights to another , and that would stop if the movie ever got made " .Anybody know if this quip is true ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I seem to remember Larry Niven saying in response to "will somebody ever make a Ringworld movie?
" something like "I hope not.
Right now I get a big payment every time one studio sells the rights to another, and that would stop if the movie ever got made".Anybody know if this quip is true?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686800</id>
	<title>Yeah, that'll be the reason...</title>
	<author>91degrees</author>
	<datestamp>1270046820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Fox can now offer more as they are swimming in the massive financial returns reaped from James Cameron's Avatar.</i> <br> <br>
Yeah, because the multi-billion dollar News Corporation couldn't quite manage that before.  <br> <br>
Seriously, the amount they'll pay for a movie is based on how much they expect it to make.  Not how much they have in their coffers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fox can now offer more as they are swimming in the massive financial returns reaped from James Cameron 's Avatar .
Yeah , because the multi-billion dollar News Corporation could n't quite manage that before .
Seriously , the amount they 'll pay for a movie is based on how much they expect it to make .
Not how much they have in their coffers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fox can now offer more as they are swimming in the massive financial returns reaped from James Cameron's Avatar.
Yeah, because the multi-billion dollar News Corporation couldn't quite manage that before.
Seriously, the amount they'll pay for a movie is based on how much they expect it to make.
Not how much they have in their coffers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31691084</id>
	<title>General reaction</title>
	<author>halcyon1234</author>
	<datestamp>1270064220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"If one isn't enough, there are reports that 2 sequels to Roland Emmerich's 1996 alien invasion blockbuster Independence Day are in the works</p></div></blockquote><p>Aw, hell, no.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" If one is n't enough , there are reports that 2 sequels to Roland Emmerich 's 1996 alien invasion blockbuster Independence Day are in the worksAw , hell , no .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"If one isn't enough, there are reports that 2 sequels to Roland Emmerich's 1996 alien invasion blockbuster Independence Day are in the worksAw, hell, no.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690110</id>
	<title>Re:Plot Spoiler!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270060380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Na they are running BSD Netcraft confirmed it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Na they are running BSD Netcraft confirmed it ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Na they are running BSD Netcraft confirmed it ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686982</id>
	<title>Re:Will Smith asking for too much money?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270047660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In before <a href="http://i1.tinypic.com/7xjdxjd.jpg" title="tinypic.com" rel="nofollow">Wol Smoth</a> [tinypic.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In before Wol Smoth [ tinypic.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In before Wol Smoth [tinypic.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686730</id>
	<title>Title ideas</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270046460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ID5: The Day after Independence Day</p><p>Independence Day 2: Aliens vs. Universal Soldier</p><p>Stargate: ID2</p><p>The Day After Independence Day, 2012 on the 13th Floor: Universal Soldier SG-1 vs. Godzilla, Eight Legged Freaks, and Cavemen from 10,0000BC</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ID5 : The Day after Independence DayIndependence Day 2 : Aliens vs. Universal SoldierStargate : ID2The Day After Independence Day , 2012 on the 13th Floor : Universal Soldier SG-1 vs. Godzilla , Eight Legged Freaks , and Cavemen from 10,0000BC</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ID5: The Day after Independence DayIndependence Day 2: Aliens vs. Universal SoldierStargate: ID2The Day After Independence Day, 2012 on the 13th Floor: Universal Soldier SG-1 vs. Godzilla, Eight Legged Freaks, and Cavemen from 10,0000BC</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687190</id>
	<title>Sony to remove shields from alien ships</title>
	<author>colordev</author>
	<datestamp>1270048620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Alien infiltrators were using Sony's "other OS"-feature when building their protective shields. Yep, never trust a Sony.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Alien infiltrators were using Sony 's " other OS " -feature when building their protective shields .
Yep , never trust a Sony .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Alien infiltrators were using Sony's "other OS"-feature when building their protective shields.
Yep, never trust a Sony.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686928</id>
	<title>Re:April Fools' Day?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270047420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>And I am sure Data won't have a monologue about what it means to be human. Instead, Will Smith will use the iPad to upload all of Data's poetry (see "Ode to Spot") to the aliens computer like in "A Fist Full of Data's" and their holodeck will start talking about how Felis Cattus is the taxonomic nomenclature an endothermic quadruped carnivorous by nature or whatever that quote was (I didn't look it up; guess that makes me a geek).</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And I am sure Data wo n't have a monologue about what it means to be human .
Instead , Will Smith will use the iPad to upload all of Data 's poetry ( see " Ode to Spot " ) to the aliens computer like in " A Fist Full of Data 's " and their holodeck will start talking about how Felis Cattus is the taxonomic nomenclature an endothermic quadruped carnivorous by nature or whatever that quote was ( I did n't look it up ; guess that makes me a geek ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I am sure Data won't have a monologue about what it means to be human.
Instead, Will Smith will use the iPad to upload all of Data's poetry (see "Ode to Spot") to the aliens computer like in "A Fist Full of Data's" and their holodeck will start talking about how Felis Cattus is the taxonomic nomenclature an endothermic quadruped carnivorous by nature or whatever that quote was (I didn't look it up; guess that makes me a geek).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686678</id>
	<title>2 Sequels of a bad film?</title>
	<author>yossarianuk</author>
	<datestamp>1270046280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why bother?<br> <br>
The First film was not exactly any good, it had a terrible script and bad acting, the effects were o.k for the time, but it was no great leap forward like jurassic park seemed a few years earlier. The CGI looked fake and the most of American nationalism on display was awful...
<br> <br>
It is not exactly going to be compared in cinematic terms to the Godfather trilogy is it (they should have missed out Godfather 3)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why bother ?
The First film was not exactly any good , it had a terrible script and bad acting , the effects were o.k for the time , but it was no great leap forward like jurassic park seemed a few years earlier .
The CGI looked fake and the most of American nationalism on display was awful.. . It is not exactly going to be compared in cinematic terms to the Godfather trilogy is it ( they should have missed out Godfather 3 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why bother?
The First film was not exactly any good, it had a terrible script and bad acting, the effects were o.k for the time, but it was no great leap forward like jurassic park seemed a few years earlier.
The CGI looked fake and the most of American nationalism on display was awful...
 
It is not exactly going to be compared in cinematic terms to the Godfather trilogy is it (they should have missed out Godfather 3)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687880</id>
	<title>Re:Good</title>
	<author>Clandestine\_Blaze</author>
	<datestamp>1270051020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If for no other reason than the attendant publicity might finally teach the people of the Internet how to correctly spell "independence".</p><p>I would also like to see "You, Your and You're", a romantic comedy starring Jennifer Aniston or Sandra Bullock.</p></div><p>"Too Loose to Lose" would be even better.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If for no other reason than the attendant publicity might finally teach the people of the Internet how to correctly spell " independence " .I would also like to see " You , Your and You 're " , a romantic comedy starring Jennifer Aniston or Sandra Bullock .
" Too Loose to Lose " would be even better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If for no other reason than the attendant publicity might finally teach the people of the Internet how to correctly spell "independence".I would also like to see "You, Your and You're", a romantic comedy starring Jennifer Aniston or Sandra Bullock.
"Too Loose to Lose" would be even better.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31692106</id>
	<title>Re:Oh dear lord.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270068300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't forget: he does that using MS-DOS. Which makes for a good argument about the interstellar origins of one Bill Gates...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget : he does that using MS-DOS .
Which makes for a good argument about the interstellar origins of one Bill Gates.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget: he does that using MS-DOS.
Which makes for a good argument about the interstellar origins of one Bill Gates...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31692678</id>
	<title>Plot Revealed</title>
	<author>prefec2</author>
	<datestamp>1270027140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In ID4.2 humans discover, that the aliens were mad at them because they thought humans had shot down that craft in the 1960s. One surviving alien tell the US president (it must be the US president, because the USA is so big that it is nearly impossible that the surviving alien could be in any other country. Especially it could not be in Russia or China). I tells the president, that a out of earth atmosphere secret nuke test destroyed the alien craft 40 years ago. After some research it is clear that there were two tests one from Russia and one form the US. So these two superpowers put together all their resources and build a ship, which they send to the alien planet. So we could talk with the alien overlords. After some setbacks this works, Will Smith has sex with an alien (which do look good, only their biological clone worriers look horrible) and we all make peace.</p><p>In ID4.3 either the Vogons blow us up or the aliens decided that we stink, as Will Smith (WS) brought tripper to their planet and now everyone is going to die (on their planet). But WS is send to the aliens with an antidote and we all life long an prosper OR WS fakes an vogonic rerouting document and they blow up the alien planet instead or Vogonsphere (which would be no big loss, as a lot of bad poetry will become history). Thinking of that... maybe R. Emmerich is not from Germany, but from Vogonsphere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In ID4.2 humans discover , that the aliens were mad at them because they thought humans had shot down that craft in the 1960s .
One surviving alien tell the US president ( it must be the US president , because the USA is so big that it is nearly impossible that the surviving alien could be in any other country .
Especially it could not be in Russia or China ) .
I tells the president , that a out of earth atmosphere secret nuke test destroyed the alien craft 40 years ago .
After some research it is clear that there were two tests one from Russia and one form the US .
So these two superpowers put together all their resources and build a ship , which they send to the alien planet .
So we could talk with the alien overlords .
After some setbacks this works , Will Smith has sex with an alien ( which do look good , only their biological clone worriers look horrible ) and we all make peace.In ID4.3 either the Vogons blow us up or the aliens decided that we stink , as Will Smith ( WS ) brought tripper to their planet and now everyone is going to die ( on their planet ) .
But WS is send to the aliens with an antidote and we all life long an prosper OR WS fakes an vogonic rerouting document and they blow up the alien planet instead or Vogonsphere ( which would be no big loss , as a lot of bad poetry will become history ) .
Thinking of that... maybe R. Emmerich is not from Germany , but from Vogonsphere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In ID4.2 humans discover, that the aliens were mad at them because they thought humans had shot down that craft in the 1960s.
One surviving alien tell the US president (it must be the US president, because the USA is so big that it is nearly impossible that the surviving alien could be in any other country.
Especially it could not be in Russia or China).
I tells the president, that a out of earth atmosphere secret nuke test destroyed the alien craft 40 years ago.
After some research it is clear that there were two tests one from Russia and one form the US.
So these two superpowers put together all their resources and build a ship, which they send to the alien planet.
So we could talk with the alien overlords.
After some setbacks this works, Will Smith has sex with an alien (which do look good, only their biological clone worriers look horrible) and we all make peace.In ID4.3 either the Vogons blow us up or the aliens decided that we stink, as Will Smith (WS) brought tripper to their planet and now everyone is going to die (on their planet).
But WS is send to the aliens with an antidote and we all life long an prosper OR WS fakes an vogonic rerouting document and they blow up the alien planet instead or Vogonsphere (which would be no big loss, as a lot of bad poetry will become history).
Thinking of that... maybe R. Emmerich is not from Germany, but from Vogonsphere.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686608</id>
	<title>April Fools' Day?</title>
	<author>DiademBedfordshire</author>
	<datestamp>1270046040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please let it be an early April Fools' Day joke.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please let it be an early April Fools ' Day joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please let it be an early April Fools' Day joke.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31694356</id>
	<title>Re:Oh dear lord.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270034760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Grandparent:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Second, aliens capable of interstellar travel would be capable of wiping us out with little to no effort.</p></div><p>Parent:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>What are you basing this on?</p></div><p>The most obvious possibility is that, if they've got propulsion technology that allows them to move large spaceships from one star to another, then they can also use it to move spaceship-sized asteroids from the asteroid belt to Earth.  We'd probably never even know they existed, let alone have the chance to make humanity-in-peril speeches.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Grandparent : Second , aliens capable of interstellar travel would be capable of wiping us out with little to no effort.Parent : What are you basing this on ? The most obvious possibility is that , if they 've got propulsion technology that allows them to move large spaceships from one star to another , then they can also use it to move spaceship-sized asteroids from the asteroid belt to Earth .
We 'd probably never even know they existed , let alone have the chance to make humanity-in-peril speeches .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Grandparent:Second, aliens capable of interstellar travel would be capable of wiping us out with little to no effort.Parent:What are you basing this on?The most obvious possibility is that, if they've got propulsion technology that allows them to move large spaceships from one star to another, then they can also use it to move spaceship-sized asteroids from the asteroid belt to Earth.
We'd probably never even know they existed, let alone have the chance to make humanity-in-peril speeches.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688592</id>
	<title>Re:Bill Pullman</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1270053840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or when he met the bad guys and said "So, Lord Helmet, at last we meet again for the first time for the last time. "</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or when he met the bad guys and said " So , Lord Helmet , at last we meet again for the first time for the last time .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or when he met the bad guys and said "So, Lord Helmet, at last we meet again for the first time for the last time.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689394</id>
	<title>Re:Good</title>
	<author>GodfatherofSoul</author>
	<datestamp>1270057440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jennifer Aniston ON Sandra Bullock and we're talking blockbuster</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jennifer Aniston ON Sandra Bullock and we 're talking blockbuster</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jennifer Aniston ON Sandra Bullock and we're talking blockbuster</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686570</id>
	<title>Will Smith asking for too much money?</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1270045800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Any amount sufficient to put him through an acting class would be a worthwhile investment. For that matter, throw in a few directing classes for Roland Emmerich while you're splurging. But (and this is a REALLY crazy idea), I think they might be even better served this time by spending at least 1/100th of the money on the actual screenplay that they're spending on catering.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any amount sufficient to put him through an acting class would be a worthwhile investment .
For that matter , throw in a few directing classes for Roland Emmerich while you 're splurging .
But ( and this is a REALLY crazy idea ) , I think they might be even better served this time by spending at least 1/100th of the money on the actual screenplay that they 're spending on catering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any amount sufficient to put him through an acting class would be a worthwhile investment.
For that matter, throw in a few directing classes for Roland Emmerich while you're splurging.
But (and this is a REALLY crazy idea), I think they might be even better served this time by spending at least 1/100th of the money on the actual screenplay that they're spending on catering.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687474</id>
	<title>Re:Well timed, actually</title>
	<author>coofercat</author>
	<datestamp>1270049700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh no, please don't let that happen. I almost cried when I saw the White House blowing up. I'm not sure I can take any more scares like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh no , please do n't let that happen .
I almost cried when I saw the White House blowing up .
I 'm not sure I can take any more scares like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh no, please don't let that happen.
I almost cried when I saw the White House blowing up.
I'm not sure I can take any more scares like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686708</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687050</id>
	<title>Oh Lord!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270047960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please tell me someone's watch is running fast...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please tell me someone 's watch is running fast.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please tell me someone's watch is running fast...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690474</id>
	<title>Re:Plot Spoiler!</title>
	<author>MarkGriz</author>
	<datestamp>1270061940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In this one, the aliens come back with a different OS, and now running Antivirus!</p></div><p>Yes, but it's <i>Norton</i> Antivirus, so Will Smith justs sits back and waits for it to crash itself.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In this one , the aliens come back with a different OS , and now running Antivirus ! Yes , but it 's Norton Antivirus , so Will Smith justs sits back and waits for it to crash itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In this one, the aliens come back with a different OS, and now running Antivirus!Yes, but it's Norton Antivirus, so Will Smith justs sits back and waits for it to crash itself.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689140</id>
	<title>Re:2 Sequels of a bad film?</title>
	<author>operagost</author>
	<datestamp>1270056240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <tt>The CGI looked fake and the most of American nationalism on display was awful</tt></p></div> </blockquote><p>It's called "patriotism"; there is a difference and BTW, didn't you notice them teaming up with IRANIANS?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The CGI looked fake and the most of American nationalism on display was awful It 's called " patriotism " ; there is a difference and BTW , did n't you notice them teaming up with IRANIANS ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> The CGI looked fake and the most of American nationalism on display was awful It's called "patriotism"; there is a difference and BTW, didn't you notice them teaming up with IRANIANS?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687074</id>
	<title>Why do people complain...</title>
	<author>MistrBlank</author>
	<datestamp>1270048020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really hate the complaints over the ending of Independence Day.</p><p>-It was already established that the aliens were using our computer systems, at the very least our satellite networking to communicate, it isn't a stretch</p><p>-The ending is a nod to War of the Worlds where a virus stopped and killed them.</p><p>-It's an EFF'ING MOVIE.  It's supposed to be entertaining and it's a movie about aliens, it's already asking you to suspend belief about the world around us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really hate the complaints over the ending of Independence Day.-It was already established that the aliens were using our computer systems , at the very least our satellite networking to communicate , it is n't a stretch-The ending is a nod to War of the Worlds where a virus stopped and killed them.-It 's an EFF'ING MOVIE .
It 's supposed to be entertaining and it 's a movie about aliens , it 's already asking you to suspend belief about the world around us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really hate the complaints over the ending of Independence Day.-It was already established that the aliens were using our computer systems, at the very least our satellite networking to communicate, it isn't a stretch-The ending is a nod to War of the Worlds where a virus stopped and killed them.-It's an EFF'ING MOVIE.
It's supposed to be entertaining and it's a movie about aliens, it's already asking you to suspend belief about the world around us.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687606</id>
	<title>Re:goddamnit</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1270050120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Jesus holly fucker.</p></div><p>1) It was made of thorns.<br>2) Wrong head.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Jesus holly fucker.1 ) It was made of thorns.2 ) Wrong head .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jesus holly fucker.1) It was made of thorns.2) Wrong head.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689246</id>
	<title>Re:What the Matrix sequels should have been</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270056720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>user-editable movies is something already here.<br>The Matrix game should soon be available in Second Life, if it is not already there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>user-editable movies is something already here.The Matrix game should soon be available in Second Life , if it is not already there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>user-editable movies is something already here.The Matrix game should soon be available in Second Life, if it is not already there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686708</id>
	<title>Well timed, actually</title>
	<author>DoofusOfDeath</author>
	<datestamp>1270046400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In these two sequels, it will be the House of Representatives and the Senate buildings that get vaporized.  In 3D.</p><p>This will shatter all revenue records.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In these two sequels , it will be the House of Representatives and the Senate buildings that get vaporized .
In 3D.This will shatter all revenue records .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In these two sequels, it will be the House of Representatives and the Senate buildings that get vaporized.
In 3D.This will shatter all revenue records.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687166</id>
	<title>Re:Entire Plot in 1 Slashdot Comment</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270048500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jeff Goldblum is actually awesome and you have a tiny penis, fuck you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jeff Goldblum is actually awesome and you have a tiny penis , fuck you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jeff Goldblum is actually awesome and you have a tiny penis, fuck you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687684</id>
	<title>Because it's the worst Sci-Fi movie ever</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270050420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I really hate the complaints over the ending of Independence Day.</p><p>-It was already established that the aliens were using our computer systems, at the very least our satellite networking to communicate, it isn't a stretch</p></div><p>If a computer engineer goes back in time to the 1950's, it's a stretch, but it's possible, that he will be able to program the 50's hardware he'll see.<br>But if a computer engineer from the 1950's is confronted with a 2000's computer, he wouldn't have a clue what to do. And especially, he won't be able to stick a virus coded on a punchcard into the new computer!</p><p>Similarly, it is conceivable that advanced aliens could tap into our primitive computers. It is less conceivable that if we see a computer centuries more advanced than ours we'd know what to do with it - much less run a computer virus written in today's programming language on it.</p><p>The movie had other nonsensical science. My favorite is when the guy is saved from nuclear explosion by.... running away from it and hiding in a corner! Utterly ridiculous.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really hate the complaints over the ending of Independence Day.-It was already established that the aliens were using our computer systems , at the very least our satellite networking to communicate , it is n't a stretchIf a computer engineer goes back in time to the 1950 's , it 's a stretch , but it 's possible , that he will be able to program the 50 's hardware he 'll see.But if a computer engineer from the 1950 's is confronted with a 2000 's computer , he would n't have a clue what to do .
And especially , he wo n't be able to stick a virus coded on a punchcard into the new computer ! Similarly , it is conceivable that advanced aliens could tap into our primitive computers .
It is less conceivable that if we see a computer centuries more advanced than ours we 'd know what to do with it - much less run a computer virus written in today 's programming language on it.The movie had other nonsensical science .
My favorite is when the guy is saved from nuclear explosion by.... running away from it and hiding in a corner !
Utterly ridiculous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really hate the complaints over the ending of Independence Day.-It was already established that the aliens were using our computer systems, at the very least our satellite networking to communicate, it isn't a stretchIf a computer engineer goes back in time to the 1950's, it's a stretch, but it's possible, that he will be able to program the 50's hardware he'll see.But if a computer engineer from the 1950's is confronted with a 2000's computer, he wouldn't have a clue what to do.
And especially, he won't be able to stick a virus coded on a punchcard into the new computer!Similarly, it is conceivable that advanced aliens could tap into our primitive computers.
It is less conceivable that if we see a computer centuries more advanced than ours we'd know what to do with it - much less run a computer virus written in today's programming language on it.The movie had other nonsensical science.
My favorite is when the guy is saved from nuclear explosion by.... running away from it and hiding in a corner!
Utterly ridiculous.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687268</id>
	<title>Re:goddamnit</title>
	<author>tophermeyer</author>
	<datestamp>1270048920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its funny, I am actually re-reading the Ring World series now.  Will Smith should have no involvement with a Ring World film whatsoever.  He just doesn't fit any of the characters (not that that would really prevent him from being cast though).</p><p>And interestingly on the topic of crappy unnecessary sequels, Ring Worlds Children blows.  I mean, it really blows.  Its awful.  </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its funny , I am actually re-reading the Ring World series now .
Will Smith should have no involvement with a Ring World film whatsoever .
He just does n't fit any of the characters ( not that that would really prevent him from being cast though ) .And interestingly on the topic of crappy unnecessary sequels , Ring Worlds Children blows .
I mean , it really blows .
Its awful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its funny, I am actually re-reading the Ring World series now.
Will Smith should have no involvement with a Ring World film whatsoever.
He just doesn't fit any of the characters (not that that would really prevent him from being cast though).And interestingly on the topic of crappy unnecessary sequels, Ring Worlds Children blows.
I mean, it really blows.
Its awful.  </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690176</id>
	<title>Re:Oh dear lord.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270060680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your comment, and this the first time I have written this, is perfect. You should be writing screenplays!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your comment , and this the first time I have written this , is perfect .
You should be writing screenplays !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your comment, and this the first time I have written this, is perfect.
You should be writing screenplays!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31693338</id>
	<title>Re:Bill Pullman</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1270029600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Protip: Speeches like these will get you laughed at in other countries.</p><p>We laughed our asses off, or cringed from the cheesiness, here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Protip : Speeches like these will get you laughed at in other countries.We laughed our asses off , or cringed from the cheesiness , here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Protip: Speeches like these will get you laughed at in other countries.We laughed our asses off, or cringed from the cheesiness, here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686818</id>
	<title>HOLY HELL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270046880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just make new goddamn movies, how hard is that???</p><p>You want my movie-going dollar? Stop giving me an experience I could rent more than 10 years ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just make new goddamn movies , how hard is that ? ?
? You want my movie-going dollar ?
Stop giving me an experience I could rent more than 10 years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just make new goddamn movies, how hard is that??
?You want my movie-going dollar?
Stop giving me an experience I could rent more than 10 years ago.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689002</id>
	<title>Re:Good</title>
	<author>DrugCheese</author>
	<datestamp>1270055640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your just talking crazy now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your just talking crazy now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your just talking crazy now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690208</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270060800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the only way to be sure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the only way to be sure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the only way to be sure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686870</id>
	<title>Re:Once you seen one Roland Emmerich</title>
	<author>quantumplacet</author>
	<datestamp>1270047060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>like maybe a biopic on shakespeare?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>like maybe a biopic on shakespeare ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>like maybe a biopic on shakespeare?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688358</id>
	<title>Obama flying an airplane?</title>
	<author>mi</author>
	<datestamp>1270052820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are only two ways lawyers can fly &mdash; as a passenger, or from high point down

</p><p>McCain <em>could</em> fly a plane, I suppose. Ditto for both Bushes. Obama (or Clinton)? Only in a movie...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are only two ways lawyers can fly    as a passenger , or from high point down McCain could fly a plane , I suppose .
Ditto for both Bushes .
Obama ( or Clinton ) ?
Only in a movie.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are only two ways lawyers can fly — as a passenger, or from high point down

McCain could fly a plane, I suppose.
Ditto for both Bushes.
Obama (or Clinton)?
Only in a movie...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_128</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31696124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_110</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31691398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31692258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31694356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31697212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31695492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_103</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31691086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688676
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31693070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31694176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_125</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_115</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_122</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31694472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31691090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31693338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687166
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31695598
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_123</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_114</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687836
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688336
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_107</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_109</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_113</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_120</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31698014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687606
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31693000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688736
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_104</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31691336
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686876
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31696380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31694328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_119</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_112</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31692106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_126</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686658
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_105</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689140
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688204
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31695192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_127</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31691990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_118</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689246
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688222
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_117</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686672
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31692442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_124</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689166
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_108</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690598
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31691292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_116</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31693390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689230
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31693100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_121</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687334
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688836
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31697772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688838
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_111</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_106</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688874
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_1241246_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688174
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687304
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686624
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686874
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688576
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31697772
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686904
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687832
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687966
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686888
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688874
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31693338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689142
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686612
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687178
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687196
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688340
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31691090
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31695492
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31692106
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689044
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31695192
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31696124
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31691398
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31691336
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690012
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31694472
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31697212
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690176
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31695598
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689852
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31692442
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31694356
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31691990
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686570
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687878
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688642
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31692258
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688676
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688242
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687134
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687140
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686784
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686748
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688174
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31694328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686928
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686720
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688358
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686730
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686768
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687030
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687748
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687166
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686642
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689540
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688138
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31694176
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31693070
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687606
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686984
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687268
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689140
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686872
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686960
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690594
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31693100
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687684
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690598
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688190
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31691086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687880
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688824
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689002
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688070
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31698014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31693000
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31696380
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686716
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686876
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686894
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686934
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688470
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687368
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688204
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687602
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690208
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689122
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688884
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687298
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31693390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31690474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688336
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686662
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686658
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686616
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688198
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31686880
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688838
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688836
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31688114
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687338
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31689246
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687350
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31691292
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_1241246.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_1241246.31687022
</commentlist>
</conversation>
