<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_31_0118202</id>
	<title>Gonorrhea As the Next Superbug</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1270047780000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>WrongSizeGlass writes <i>"Reuters is reporting that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonorrhea">Gonorrhea</a> <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62S5KF20100329">risks becoming a superbug</a>:  'The sexually transmitted disease gonorrhea risks becoming a drug-resistant "superbug" if doctors do not devise new ways of treating it, a leading sexual health expert said.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>WrongSizeGlass writes " Reuters is reporting that Gonorrhea risks becoming a superbug : 'The sexually transmitted disease gonorrhea risks becoming a drug-resistant " superbug " if doctors do not devise new ways of treating it , a leading sexual health expert said .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WrongSizeGlass writes "Reuters is reporting that Gonorrhea risks becoming a superbug:  'The sexually transmitted disease gonorrhea risks becoming a drug-resistant "superbug" if doctors do not devise new ways of treating it, a leading sexual health expert said.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683974</id>
	<title>Re:An STD the next super-bug?</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1270066920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Clearly, the geeks shall inherit the Earth.</p></div></blockquote><p>Hold on, you haven't solved the reproduction part. (I'm still trying mitosis.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly , the geeks shall inherit the Earth.Hold on , you have n't solved the reproduction part .
( I 'm still trying mitosis .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly, the geeks shall inherit the Earth.Hold on, you haven't solved the reproduction part.
(I'm still trying mitosis.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683222</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Chaffar</author>
	<datestamp>1269973500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <b>Thank God</b> we all agree that teaching adolescent kids about condoms is a good idea...</p></div></blockquote><p>
What? But I thought God was against condoms!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank God we all agree that teaching adolescent kids about condoms is a good idea.. . What ? But I thought God was against condoms !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Thank God we all agree that teaching adolescent kids about condoms is a good idea...
What? But I thought God was against condoms!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31686030</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270042800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In a word YES</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In a word YES</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a word YES</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682766</id>
	<title>How is this news for nerds?</title>
	<author>psithurism</author>
	<datestamp>1269969420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is this news for nerds?</p><p>Being nerd protects me quite well from such diseases. Is this some sort of appeal from non-nerds for our help?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this news for nerds ? Being nerd protects me quite well from such diseases .
Is this some sort of appeal from non-nerds for our help ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this news for nerds?Being nerd protects me quite well from such diseases.
Is this some sort of appeal from non-nerds for our help?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684234</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>williamhb</author>
	<datestamp>1270026480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>On the other hand, this could be exceptionally nasty in third world nations, especially in places where condoms aren't available or expensive.</p> </div><p>You might want to revisit <a href="http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory\_96190.html" title="nih.gov">the statistics</a> [nih.gov].  Up to 1 in 6 Americans has herpes.  Meanwhile, chlamydia infection rates have doubled in the last 10 years.  Young people (15-24) make up half of all new STI infections each year.  This is not some third world problem.</p><p>It won't be popular to say this on Slashdot, but it also turns out that your grandparents' solution (waiting until marriage) is very effective indeed: from the medical article <i>"About 4 percent of those with one lifetime sex partner were found to have herpes, compared with about 27 percent of those who reported having 10 or more partners."</i></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>On the other hand , this could be exceptionally nasty in third world nations , especially in places where condoms are n't available or expensive .
You might want to revisit the statistics [ nih.gov ] .
Up to 1 in 6 Americans has herpes .
Meanwhile , chlamydia infection rates have doubled in the last 10 years .
Young people ( 15-24 ) make up half of all new STI infections each year .
This is not some third world problem.It wo n't be popular to say this on Slashdot , but it also turns out that your grandparents ' solution ( waiting until marriage ) is very effective indeed : from the medical article " About 4 percent of those with one lifetime sex partner were found to have herpes , compared with about 27 percent of those who reported having 10 or more partners .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the other hand, this could be exceptionally nasty in third world nations, especially in places where condoms aren't available or expensive.
You might want to revisit the statistics [nih.gov].
Up to 1 in 6 Americans has herpes.
Meanwhile, chlamydia infection rates have doubled in the last 10 years.
Young people (15-24) make up half of all new STI infections each year.
This is not some third world problem.It won't be popular to say this on Slashdot, but it also turns out that your grandparents' solution (waiting until marriage) is very effective indeed: from the medical article "About 4 percent of those with one lifetime sex partner were found to have herpes, compared with about 27 percent of those who reported having 10 or more partners.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683650</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269977520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"tenets", sweetie. try not to look ignorant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" tenets " , sweetie .
try not to look ignorant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"tenets", sweetie.
try not to look ignorant.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31687038</id>
	<title>I'm Safe.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270047840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sweet. I can just continue not getting laid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sweet .
I can just continue not getting laid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sweet.
I can just continue not getting laid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685934</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270042140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nope, Catholics can marry outside the faith, but there are particular rules for the wedding in order for the Catholic Church to recognize the marriage.  It gets a little dicey if the other faith is not a Christian faith and you don't want the marriage ceremony in the Catholic Church, but it is still possible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope , Catholics can marry outside the faith , but there are particular rules for the wedding in order for the Catholic Church to recognize the marriage .
It gets a little dicey if the other faith is not a Christian faith and you do n't want the marriage ceremony in the Catholic Church , but it is still possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope, Catholics can marry outside the faith, but there are particular rules for the wedding in order for the Catholic Church to recognize the marriage.
It gets a little dicey if the other faith is not a Christian faith and you don't want the marriage ceremony in the Catholic Church, but it is still possible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682596</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269967920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Name one religion that allows sex outside of marriage but insists that no condom be used.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Name one religion that allows sex outside of marriage but insists that no condom be used .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Name one religion that allows sex outside of marriage but insists that no condom be used.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683660</id>
	<title>Poor Gonorrhea</title>
	<author>DynaSoar</author>
	<datestamp>1269977520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Reuters is reporting that Gonorrhea risks becoming a superbug"</p><p>Why would gonorrhea risk doing that? It must be a very good reason for it to undertake such a risk. Now if it were 'at risk of', TFA would make sense.</p><p>Yeah it's a cheap shot. But for fuck sake, Reuters?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Reuters is reporting that Gonorrhea risks becoming a superbug " Why would gonorrhea risk doing that ?
It must be a very good reason for it to undertake such a risk .
Now if it were 'at risk of ' , TFA would make sense.Yeah it 's a cheap shot .
But for fuck sake , Reuters ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Reuters is reporting that Gonorrhea risks becoming a superbug"Why would gonorrhea risk doing that?
It must be a very good reason for it to undertake such a risk.
Now if it were 'at risk of', TFA would make sense.Yeah it's a cheap shot.
But for fuck sake, Reuters?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685776</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270040940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if that's your idea of a perfect world, I'd rather go to hell.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if that 's your idea of a perfect world , I 'd rather go to hell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if that's your idea of a perfect world, I'd rather go to hell.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682882</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1269970620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Exercise some self-discipline and keep your pecker in your pocket. No worries about broken or slipped condoms, or being overcome by the moment and not using one.</p></div><p>I'm confused.  If one is overcome by the moment and not using a condom, doesn't that imply that self-discipline, and keeping it in a pocket has failed at least once?  Your advice seems a little like "Don't be flammable, so that way you won't catch on fire and burn to death."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exercise some self-discipline and keep your pecker in your pocket .
No worries about broken or slipped condoms , or being overcome by the moment and not using one.I 'm confused .
If one is overcome by the moment and not using a condom , does n't that imply that self-discipline , and keeping it in a pocket has failed at least once ?
Your advice seems a little like " Do n't be flammable , so that way you wo n't catch on fire and burn to death .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exercise some self-discipline and keep your pecker in your pocket.
No worries about broken or slipped condoms, or being overcome by the moment and not using one.I'm confused.
If one is overcome by the moment and not using a condom, doesn't that imply that self-discipline, and keeping it in a pocket has failed at least once?
Your advice seems a little like "Don't be flammable, so that way you won't catch on fire and burn to death.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138</id>
	<title>What?</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1269965160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Gonorrhea?  I thought we had that one licked.</p><p>Thank god we all agree that teaching adolescent kids about condoms is a good idea, or this could get really become a big problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gonorrhea ?
I thought we had that one licked.Thank god we all agree that teaching adolescent kids about condoms is a good idea , or this could get really become a big problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gonorrhea?
I thought we had that one licked.Thank god we all agree that teaching adolescent kids about condoms is a good idea, or this could get really become a big problem.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31686840</id>
	<title>And so...</title>
	<author>feldicus</author>
	<datestamp>1270046880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Captain Trips becomes Captain Claps.</p><p>feldicus</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Captain Trips becomes Captain Claps.feldicus</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Captain Trips becomes Captain Claps.feldicus</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31696340</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270047000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's highly doubtful that an STD that kills fast enough to prevent the infected to crap out a kid first would hit 100\% of the population.  In fact an STD that killed that fast would be less likely to infect a lot of people (they die before passing it on) and a weaker STD just wouldn't stop reproduction.  Don't forget that Gonorrhea might as well have been a superbug a few hundred years ago when there were no antibiotics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's highly doubtful that an STD that kills fast enough to prevent the infected to crap out a kid first would hit 100 \ % of the population .
In fact an STD that killed that fast would be less likely to infect a lot of people ( they die before passing it on ) and a weaker STD just would n't stop reproduction .
Do n't forget that Gonorrhea might as well have been a superbug a few hundred years ago when there were no antibiotics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's highly doubtful that an STD that kills fast enough to prevent the infected to crap out a kid first would hit 100\% of the population.
In fact an STD that killed that fast would be less likely to infect a lot of people (they die before passing it on) and a weaker STD just wouldn't stop reproduction.
Don't forget that Gonorrhea might as well have been a superbug a few hundred years ago when there were no antibiotics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682798</id>
	<title>Re:Socially Fucked</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1269969720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>STDs are a "feature not a bug" situation, a form population control.</p> </div><p>Diseases in general are a check on population.  Not a "feature" though, at least in an evolutionary sense.  Unless your population grows so big, it chokes it's own resources off and the whole population goes extinct, there's not much evolutionary advantage to limiting your numbers, at least not to the individual organism.</p><p>On a cellular basis, something like population control has evolved, but that's because when one cell overpopulates (cancer) that dooms all the cells, your melanoma isn't going to hop ship and thrive if it kills you.  With individual organisms in a population, there's not much of an advantage: you have fewer kids, your neighbor still has 40, if the whole town starves, they're more likely to survive and pass on their selfish genes, and in good times they still have the advantage.  With the disease, if you have 400 animal lines who were susceptible to the disease when their population got too high, and one line that was resistant to the disease, selfish, the disease would itself select for resistance, and within one or two disease wipes (depending on how effective the disease was) the whole population would be resistant.</p><p>Humans actually in many ways represent a foolish dead end direction in terms of evolution.  We have maybe 4 kids on average?  That's not much when compared to even other vertebrates, let alone invertebrates, who vastly outnumber us and have far more diversity, and in terms of evolutionary fitness, the whole multicellular thing was a bad idea.  It would only take one measly nuclear apocalypse to wipe us humans out.  Cockroaches would come back in a few years, and bacterial numbers would probably barely blip.  So no, there's no reason to evolve to limit your own numbers via disease.</p><p>Maybe you were talking more philosophically and less evolutionarily...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>STDs are a " feature not a bug " situation , a form population control .
Diseases in general are a check on population .
Not a " feature " though , at least in an evolutionary sense .
Unless your population grows so big , it chokes it 's own resources off and the whole population goes extinct , there 's not much evolutionary advantage to limiting your numbers , at least not to the individual organism.On a cellular basis , something like population control has evolved , but that 's because when one cell overpopulates ( cancer ) that dooms all the cells , your melanoma is n't going to hop ship and thrive if it kills you .
With individual organisms in a population , there 's not much of an advantage : you have fewer kids , your neighbor still has 40 , if the whole town starves , they 're more likely to survive and pass on their selfish genes , and in good times they still have the advantage .
With the disease , if you have 400 animal lines who were susceptible to the disease when their population got too high , and one line that was resistant to the disease , selfish , the disease would itself select for resistance , and within one or two disease wipes ( depending on how effective the disease was ) the whole population would be resistant.Humans actually in many ways represent a foolish dead end direction in terms of evolution .
We have maybe 4 kids on average ?
That 's not much when compared to even other vertebrates , let alone invertebrates , who vastly outnumber us and have far more diversity , and in terms of evolutionary fitness , the whole multicellular thing was a bad idea .
It would only take one measly nuclear apocalypse to wipe us humans out .
Cockroaches would come back in a few years , and bacterial numbers would probably barely blip .
So no , there 's no reason to evolve to limit your own numbers via disease.Maybe you were talking more philosophically and less evolutionarily.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>STDs are a "feature not a bug" situation, a form population control.
Diseases in general are a check on population.
Not a "feature" though, at least in an evolutionary sense.
Unless your population grows so big, it chokes it's own resources off and the whole population goes extinct, there's not much evolutionary advantage to limiting your numbers, at least not to the individual organism.On a cellular basis, something like population control has evolved, but that's because when one cell overpopulates (cancer) that dooms all the cells, your melanoma isn't going to hop ship and thrive if it kills you.
With individual organisms in a population, there's not much of an advantage: you have fewer kids, your neighbor still has 40, if the whole town starves, they're more likely to survive and pass on their selfish genes, and in good times they still have the advantage.
With the disease, if you have 400 animal lines who were susceptible to the disease when their population got too high, and one line that was resistant to the disease, selfish, the disease would itself select for resistance, and within one or two disease wipes (depending on how effective the disease was) the whole population would be resistant.Humans actually in many ways represent a foolish dead end direction in terms of evolution.
We have maybe 4 kids on average?
That's not much when compared to even other vertebrates, let alone invertebrates, who vastly outnumber us and have far more diversity, and in terms of evolutionary fitness, the whole multicellular thing was a bad idea.
It would only take one measly nuclear apocalypse to wipe us humans out.
Cockroaches would come back in a few years, and bacterial numbers would probably barely blip.
So no, there's no reason to evolve to limit your own numbers via disease.Maybe you were talking more philosophically and less evolutionarily...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269969600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>And if the people are listening to a religious restriction, saying condom use is against their faith, now we're back to the Darwin angle.</p></div></blockquote><p>I wish people would stop peddling this ignorant crap.  The Catholic church is against condoms, yes, but it's also against extramarital sex.  If you're <i>really</i> an observant Catholic the lack of condoms isn't going to increase your risk of contracting STDs.
</p><p>Catholics having extramarital sex aren't acting within the tenants of their faith, and if they don't wear condoms it's because nobody likes to wear condoms, not because of any church teaching.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And if the people are listening to a religious restriction , saying condom use is against their faith , now we 're back to the Darwin angle.I wish people would stop peddling this ignorant crap .
The Catholic church is against condoms , yes , but it 's also against extramarital sex .
If you 're really an observant Catholic the lack of condoms is n't going to increase your risk of contracting STDs .
Catholics having extramarital sex are n't acting within the tenants of their faith , and if they do n't wear condoms it 's because nobody likes to wear condoms , not because of any church teaching .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if the people are listening to a religious restriction, saying condom use is against their faith, now we're back to the Darwin angle.I wish people would stop peddling this ignorant crap.
The Catholic church is against condoms, yes, but it's also against extramarital sex.
If you're really an observant Catholic the lack of condoms isn't going to increase your risk of contracting STDs.
Catholics having extramarital sex aren't acting within the tenants of their faith, and if they don't wear condoms it's because nobody likes to wear condoms, not because of any church teaching.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683808</id>
	<title>Manila ??</title>
	<author>vikingpower</author>
	<datestamp>1269978900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of all places, the conference met in MANILA, for crying out loud. Wonder how many participants came home with their nice personal version of the claps. "Look, mommie, without hands !"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of all places , the conference met in MANILA , for crying out loud .
Wonder how many participants came home with their nice personal version of the claps .
" Look , mommie , without hands !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of all places, the conference met in MANILA, for crying out loud.
Wonder how many participants came home with their nice personal version of the claps.
"Look, mommie, without hands !
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248</id>
	<title>Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269965820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>your pecker in your pocket.  No worries about broken or slipped condoms, or being overcome by the moment and not using one.</p><p>Of course, mentioning this to young, self-righteous members of an incredibly hedonistic and narcissistic society is akin to pissing into the wind, so I fully expect to get modded into oblivion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>your pecker in your pocket .
No worries about broken or slipped condoms , or being overcome by the moment and not using one.Of course , mentioning this to young , self-righteous members of an incredibly hedonistic and narcissistic society is akin to pissing into the wind , so I fully expect to get modded into oblivion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>your pecker in your pocket.
No worries about broken or slipped condoms, or being overcome by the moment and not using one.Of course, mentioning this to young, self-righteous members of an incredibly hedonistic and narcissistic society is akin to pissing into the wind, so I fully expect to get modded into oblivion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31690236</id>
	<title>That's only part of the problem</title>
	<author>gillbates</author>
	<datestamp>1270060920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
<p>
The reason abstinence is taught in schools is because it *reduces* the sexual activity of teenagers.  Even the authors of such programs realize there will be those at the ends of the bell curve for which no amount of education will keep them out of trouble.  Even if you teach kids to use condoms, there will inevitably be some who just don't get the message, or are too stupid (or incautious) to use one.  The difference between teaching condom use and abstinence lies in what happens to the majority: with condoms, most end up having more sex; with abstinence, much less sex.  Studies have shown (and I really wish I had a link now) that teaching condom use results in *more* unprotected sex than teaching abstinence, simply because of the proliferation of sexual activity and the frequency with which teenagers find themselves without a condom.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason abstinence is taught in schools is because it * reduces * the sexual activity of teenagers .
Even the authors of such programs realize there will be those at the ends of the bell curve for which no amount of education will keep them out of trouble .
Even if you teach kids to use condoms , there will inevitably be some who just do n't get the message , or are too stupid ( or incautious ) to use one .
The difference between teaching condom use and abstinence lies in what happens to the majority : with condoms , most end up having more sex ; with abstinence , much less sex .
Studies have shown ( and I really wish I had a link now ) that teaching condom use results in * more * unprotected sex than teaching abstinence , simply because of the proliferation of sexual activity and the frequency with which teenagers find themselves without a condom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>

The reason abstinence is taught in schools is because it *reduces* the sexual activity of teenagers.
Even the authors of such programs realize there will be those at the ends of the bell curve for which no amount of education will keep them out of trouble.
Even if you teach kids to use condoms, there will inevitably be some who just don't get the message, or are too stupid (or incautious) to use one.
The difference between teaching condom use and abstinence lies in what happens to the majority: with condoms, most end up having more sex; with abstinence, much less sex.
Studies have shown (and I really wish I had a link now) that teaching condom use results in *more* unprotected sex than teaching abstinence, simply because of the proliferation of sexual activity and the frequency with which teenagers find themselves without a condom.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683180</id>
	<title>Surgeon General recommendation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269973260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Surgeon General has recommended joining Slashdot as a preventative measure. Studies have shown it's more affective than condoms at preventing sexually transmitted diseases.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Surgeon General has recommended joining Slashdot as a preventative measure .
Studies have shown it 's more affective than condoms at preventing sexually transmitted diseases .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Surgeon General has recommended joining Slashdot as a preventative measure.
Studies have shown it's more affective than condoms at preventing sexually transmitted diseases.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682488</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>rubycodez</author>
	<datestamp>1269967200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Syphilis and chlamydia rates are also going up after being down in the 90s, and they also are curable diseases.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Syphilis and chlamydia rates are also going up after being down in the 90s , and they also are curable diseases .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Syphilis and chlamydia rates are also going up after being down in the 90s, and they also are curable diseases.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683194</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>slashgimp</author>
	<datestamp>1269973260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sure, and hormone-soaked teenagers whose brains are still trying to develop good impulse control always think rationally and choose abstinence when a member of their preferred sex is hot to trot for them.  This is why abstinence-only education has been such a rousing success everywhere it's been tried.</p></div><p>uhhh<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..."such arousing success"?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</p><p>Whee!<br>SG</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , and hormone-soaked teenagers whose brains are still trying to develop good impulse control always think rationally and choose abstinence when a member of their preferred sex is hot to trot for them .
This is why abstinence-only education has been such a rousing success everywhere it 's been tried.uhhh ... " such arousing success " ?
: pWhee ! SG</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, and hormone-soaked teenagers whose brains are still trying to develop good impulse control always think rationally and choose abstinence when a member of their preferred sex is hot to trot for them.
This is why abstinence-only education has been such a rousing success everywhere it's been tried.uhhh ..."such arousing success"?
:pWhee!SG
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682474</id>
	<title>Cure</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269967020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cure: Post on slashdot and never have contact with those pesky disease carrying ladies</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cure : Post on slashdot and never have contact with those pesky disease carrying ladies</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cure: Post on slashdot and never have contact with those pesky disease carrying ladies</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682462</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269967020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do you really think it's self-righteous, hedonistic, and narcissistic to have sex?  It's how you got here. <br> <br>Live a little!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you really think it 's self-righteous , hedonistic , and narcissistic to have sex ?
It 's how you got here .
Live a little !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you really think it's self-righteous, hedonistic, and narcissistic to have sex?
It's how you got here.
Live a little!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31690628</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>david\_thornley</author>
	<datestamp>1270062540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Heck, in a perfect world I could screw like bunnies with dozens of women and not get an STD.  (Of course, in a perfect world, I might not want to.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heck , in a perfect world I could screw like bunnies with dozens of women and not get an STD .
( Of course , in a perfect world , I might not want to .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Heck, in a perfect world I could screw like bunnies with dozens of women and not get an STD.
(Of course, in a perfect world, I might not want to.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683486</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1269976020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah right.  When exactly in history do you think the young and self-righteous (or old and cynical for that matter) of any reasonably sizeable society have actually routinely abstained from sex?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah right .
When exactly in history do you think the young and self-righteous ( or old and cynical for that matter ) of any reasonably sizeable society have actually routinely abstained from sex ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah right.
When exactly in history do you think the young and self-righteous (or old and cynical for that matter) of any reasonably sizeable society have actually routinely abstained from sex?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683328</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269974340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Nobody advocating sex ed will deny that abstinence is the only 100\% prevention for abstinence, but the reality is that some people will have sex in spite of the consequences, and so they are entitled to the most medically accurate info about it, and how things like condoms will mitigate the risks.</p></div><p>I assume because following abstinence, by definition, means that one will certainly not prevent abstinence?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody advocating sex ed will deny that abstinence is the only 100 \ % prevention for abstinence , but the reality is that some people will have sex in spite of the consequences , and so they are entitled to the most medically accurate info about it , and how things like condoms will mitigate the risks.I assume because following abstinence , by definition , means that one will certainly not prevent abstinence ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Nobody advocating sex ed will deny that abstinence is the only 100\% prevention for abstinence, but the reality is that some people will have sex in spite of the consequences, and so they are entitled to the most medically accurate info about it, and how things like condoms will mitigate the risks.I assume because following abstinence, by definition, means that one will certainly not prevent abstinence?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685346</id>
	<title>Technically ...</title>
	<author>DrYak</author>
	<datestamp>1270037160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>My philosophy when it comes to infections - hit them hard and don't let up until they are dead, dead, dead!</p></div><p>Technically, the proper medical procedure is, indeed :<br>- to use the lowest powerful antibiotic (if penicillin works, use it, damn !) and only if needed (most cold are caused by viruses and don't need any)<br>- make it really, really, really clear to the patient, that he/she had to take the antibiotics all the way until the end of the cure, until all the bacteria are clearly and definitely dead. And not stop abruptly as soon as he/she feels better.</p><p>That slows down the evolution of super-bugs.</p><p>(and in addition to what you said :<br>- most antibiotics kill all bacteria indiscriminately, not only bugs, but the normal flora : which perturbs some normal function and leave the place free for bad yeast to rush in. So always explain to the patient which food contain good probiotics to compensate (like some yogurts) and prescribe some probiotics too (usually some good yeast) )</p><p>That's what we're taught in our medical education.<br>The only problems comes into getting the correct choice of the lowest denomination antibiotics.<br>- On one hand, hospitals have proven and tested recommendation (based on tests against resistance, etc.) And might even have some quick tests to predict resistance (so even when super bugs become prevalent, you can still detect which don't need the super-drug).<br>- On the other hand, pharmaceutical companies have an agenda to push for newer (and still patented) drugs.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My philosophy when it comes to infections - hit them hard and do n't let up until they are dead , dead , dead ! Technically , the proper medical procedure is , indeed : - to use the lowest powerful antibiotic ( if penicillin works , use it , damn !
) and only if needed ( most cold are caused by viruses and do n't need any ) - make it really , really , really clear to the patient , that he/she had to take the antibiotics all the way until the end of the cure , until all the bacteria are clearly and definitely dead .
And not stop abruptly as soon as he/she feels better.That slows down the evolution of super-bugs .
( and in addition to what you said : - most antibiotics kill all bacteria indiscriminately , not only bugs , but the normal flora : which perturbs some normal function and leave the place free for bad yeast to rush in .
So always explain to the patient which food contain good probiotics to compensate ( like some yogurts ) and prescribe some probiotics too ( usually some good yeast ) ) That 's what we 're taught in our medical education.The only problems comes into getting the correct choice of the lowest denomination antibiotics.- On one hand , hospitals have proven and tested recommendation ( based on tests against resistance , etc .
) And might even have some quick tests to predict resistance ( so even when super bugs become prevalent , you can still detect which do n't need the super-drug ) .- On the other hand , pharmaceutical companies have an agenda to push for newer ( and still patented ) drugs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My philosophy when it comes to infections - hit them hard and don't let up until they are dead, dead, dead!Technically, the proper medical procedure is, indeed :- to use the lowest powerful antibiotic (if penicillin works, use it, damn !
) and only if needed (most cold are caused by viruses and don't need any)- make it really, really, really clear to the patient, that he/she had to take the antibiotics all the way until the end of the cure, until all the bacteria are clearly and definitely dead.
And not stop abruptly as soon as he/she feels better.That slows down the evolution of super-bugs.
(and in addition to what you said :- most antibiotics kill all bacteria indiscriminately, not only bugs, but the normal flora : which perturbs some normal function and leave the place free for bad yeast to rush in.
So always explain to the patient which food contain good probiotics to compensate (like some yogurts) and prescribe some probiotics too (usually some good yeast) )That's what we're taught in our medical education.The only problems comes into getting the correct choice of the lowest denomination antibiotics.- On one hand, hospitals have proven and tested recommendation (based on tests against resistance, etc.
) And might even have some quick tests to predict resistance (so even when super bugs become prevalent, you can still detect which don't need the super-drug).- On the other hand, pharmaceutical companies have an agenda to push for newer (and still patented) drugs.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682750</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683734</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1269978180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> Catholics having extramarital sex aren't acting within the <b>tenants</b> of their faith</p></div></blockquote><p>Are they obeying the Lord or the landlord?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Catholics having extramarital sex are n't acting within the tenants of their faithAre they obeying the Lord or the landlord ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Catholics having extramarital sex aren't acting within the tenants of their faithAre they obeying the Lord or the landlord?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682864</id>
	<title>Re:Socially Fucked</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269970380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your point was that windows security is doing just fine.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your point was that windows security is doing just fine .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your point was that windows security is doing just fine.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685730</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270040520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only the Irish.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only the Irish .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only the Irish.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682888</id>
	<title>Clearly the answer is.....</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1269970620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clearly the answer is to convert Humanity from a Sexual Species that reproduces via Sexual Mating, to one that is Asexual and reproduces via Asexual technology assisted Cloning.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly the answer is to convert Humanity from a Sexual Species that reproduces via Sexual Mating , to one that is Asexual and reproduces via Asexual technology assisted Cloning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly the answer is to convert Humanity from a Sexual Species that reproduces via Sexual Mating, to one that is Asexual and reproduces via Asexual technology assisted Cloning.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683928</id>
	<title>Re:Socially Fucked</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1270066380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>While on this line of thought, I would liken using Norton to wearing 8 condoms, all which having been poked with a needle, and Spybot Search &amp; Destroy being the "Pull-Out" contraceptive method, and disconnecting from the internet altogether being like a hysterectomy. Unfortunately, we can't forget Live OneCare, which is like wrapping it with toilet paper, drinking a fifth of tequila, taking two viagras, and then wandering around Mexico City.</p></div></blockquote><p>Where does Slashdot fit into the above? Oh, right, Slashdot is like posting about these things, like I'm doing. Guaranteed safe.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>While on this line of thought , I would liken using Norton to wearing 8 condoms , all which having been poked with a needle , and Spybot Search &amp; Destroy being the " Pull-Out " contraceptive method , and disconnecting from the internet altogether being like a hysterectomy .
Unfortunately , we ca n't forget Live OneCare , which is like wrapping it with toilet paper , drinking a fifth of tequila , taking two viagras , and then wandering around Mexico City.Where does Slashdot fit into the above ?
Oh , right , Slashdot is like posting about these things , like I 'm doing .
Guaranteed safe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While on this line of thought, I would liken using Norton to wearing 8 condoms, all which having been poked with a needle, and Spybot Search &amp; Destroy being the "Pull-Out" contraceptive method, and disconnecting from the internet altogether being like a hysterectomy.
Unfortunately, we can't forget Live OneCare, which is like wrapping it with toilet paper, drinking a fifth of tequila, taking two viagras, and then wandering around Mexico City.Where does Slashdot fit into the above?
Oh, right, Slashdot is like posting about these things, like I'm doing.
Guaranteed safe.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683246</id>
	<title>As a virgin</title>
	<author>Sam36</author>
	<datestamp>1269973620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>as a 26 year old virgin, I always kind of laugh when I read the latest news on std's. haha suckers! have fun with your adultery</htmltext>
<tokenext>as a 26 year old virgin , I always kind of laugh when I read the latest news on std 's .
haha suckers !
have fun with your adultery</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as a 26 year old virgin, I always kind of laugh when I read the latest news on std's.
haha suckers!
have fun with your adultery</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684280</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>symes</author>
	<datestamp>1270026720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Gonorrhea?  I thought we had that one licked.</p></div><p>Alas no - we are doomed to a sticky end!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gonorrhea ?
I thought we had that one licked.Alas no - we are doomed to a sticky end !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gonorrhea?
I thought we had that one licked.Alas no - we are doomed to a sticky end!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683914</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270066260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>My gay friend thought that anal sex wouldn't put the penetrating partner at risk or some bullshit. He's smart, quite smart, but hell, why does he have to fit the gay stereotype of being a fucking idiot about safety? It's like his brain just turned off or something.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My gay friend thought that anal sex would n't put the penetrating partner at risk or some bullshit .
He 's smart , quite smart , but hell , why does he have to fit the gay stereotype of being a fucking idiot about safety ?
It 's like his brain just turned off or something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My gay friend thought that anal sex wouldn't put the penetrating partner at risk or some bullshit.
He's smart, quite smart, but hell, why does he have to fit the gay stereotype of being a fucking idiot about safety?
It's like his brain just turned off or something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684700</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>YourExperiment</author>
	<datestamp>1270030500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Gonorrhea? I thought we had that one licked.</p></div><p>Ewww. Speak for yourself.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gonorrhea ?
I thought we had that one licked.Ewww .
Speak for yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gonorrhea?
I thought we had that one licked.Ewww.
Speak for yourself.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31694220</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>thatskinnyguy</author>
	<datestamp>1270033980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Syphilis. That one's been around a while. And I do believe that there is no cure.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Syphilis .
That one 's been around a while .
And I do believe that there is no cure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Syphilis.
That one's been around a while.
And I do believe that there is no cure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31690926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682204</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269965520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Gonorrhea? I thought we had that one licked.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Well there is your problem: DONT LICK ANYONE WITH GONORRHEA.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gonorrhea ?
I thought we had that one licked .
Well there is your problem : DONT LICK ANYONE WITH GONORRHEA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gonorrhea?
I thought we had that one licked.
Well there is your problem: DONT LICK ANYONE WITH GONORRHEA.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682638</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>LordLucless</author>
	<datestamp>1269968220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Abstinence is the best (well, most effective) preventative measure. It's just that, like the pill and condoms, it fails when people don't actually use it. What your anecdote shows is that there should probably be a greater emphasis placed on STDs and the possibility of infection via oral sex in current sex ed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Abstinence is the best ( well , most effective ) preventative measure .
It 's just that , like the pill and condoms , it fails when people do n't actually use it .
What your anecdote shows is that there should probably be a greater emphasis placed on STDs and the possibility of infection via oral sex in current sex ed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Abstinence is the best (well, most effective) preventative measure.
It's just that, like the pill and condoms, it fails when people don't actually use it.
What your anecdote shows is that there should probably be a greater emphasis placed on STDs and the possibility of infection via oral sex in current sex ed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684178</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270069140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Are Catholics forbidden from marrying non-Catholics ?</p><p>What difference would that make?</p><p>(FYI:  there are condoms that women can wear, too.  I shouldn't have to mention that, but this IS Slashdot...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Are Catholics forbidden from marrying non-Catholics ? What difference would that make ?
( FYI : there are condoms that women can wear , too .
I should n't have to mention that , but this IS Slashdot... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Are Catholics forbidden from marrying non-Catholics ?What difference would that make?
(FYI:  there are condoms that women can wear, too.
I shouldn't have to mention that, but this IS Slashdot...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31690452</id>
	<title>Re:An STD the next super-bug?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270061880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and have no heirs themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and have no heirs themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and have no heirs themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682292</id>
	<title>That's a bit of a generalization</title>
	<author>ciaohound</author>
	<datestamp>1269966060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People have been and, as long as there is goatse.cx, will continue to be exposed on slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People have been and , as long as there is goatse.cx , will continue to be exposed on slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People have been and, as long as there is goatse.cx, will continue to be exposed on slashdot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31688950</id>
	<title>Blah blah blah</title>
	<author>Aphoxema</author>
	<datestamp>1270055460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bah, just ignore this guy, it worked  for all the other people talking about this "Superbug" nonsense.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bah , just ignore this guy , it worked for all the other people talking about this " Superbug " nonsense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bah, just ignore this guy, it worked  for all the other people talking about this "Superbug" nonsense.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682832</id>
	<title>Re:Socially Fucked</title>
	<author>Black Sabbath</author>
	<datestamp>1269970020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Perhaps in the eyes of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... evolution, STDs are a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... form population control</p><p>Dude, in the eyes of evolution, EVERYTHING is potentially a form of population control. Hell, Gentoo Linux is a form of population control.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Perhaps in the eyes of ... evolution , STDs are a ... form population controlDude , in the eyes of evolution , EVERYTHING is potentially a form of population control .
Hell , Gentoo Linux is a form of population control .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Perhaps in the eyes of ... evolution, STDs are a ... form population controlDude, in the eyes of evolution, EVERYTHING is potentially a form of population control.
Hell, Gentoo Linux is a form of population control.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683100</id>
	<title>stealing from the future</title>
	<author>cats-paw</author>
	<datestamp>1269972480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's not good enough that we've trashed the planet and are taking it away from future generations, now we're going to take antibiotics (and soon anti-virals) away from them too.</p><p>why do we hate our children ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's not good enough that we 've trashed the planet and are taking it away from future generations , now we 're going to take antibiotics ( and soon anti-virals ) away from them too.why do we hate our children ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's not good enough that we've trashed the planet and are taking it away from future generations, now we're going to take antibiotics (and soon anti-virals) away from them too.why do we hate our children ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31686116</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270043160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Abstinence is like communism: in a perfect world, it'd work.</p></div><p>I hear that a lot. However, in a perfect world, none would feel they needed communism.</p><p>Communism is cure for corruption in capitalism. Capitalism is cure for corruption in communism. I guess there is no cure for corruption, except perhaps a large asteroid impact, or equivalent.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Abstinence is like communism : in a perfect world , it 'd work.I hear that a lot .
However , in a perfect world , none would feel they needed communism.Communism is cure for corruption in capitalism .
Capitalism is cure for corruption in communism .
I guess there is no cure for corruption , except perhaps a large asteroid impact , or equivalent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Abstinence is like communism: in a perfect world, it'd work.I hear that a lot.
However, in a perfect world, none would feel they needed communism.Communism is cure for corruption in capitalism.
Capitalism is cure for corruption in communism.
I guess there is no cure for corruption, except perhaps a large asteroid impact, or equivalent.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682780</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an idea</title>
	<author>the\_humeister</author>
	<datestamp>1269969540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's a nice sentiment. Unfortunately there's a not too small contingent of people who believe that sex education = abstinence education leading to people who will have sex without proper protection.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a nice sentiment .
Unfortunately there 's a not too small contingent of people who believe that sex education = abstinence education leading to people who will have sex without proper protection .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a nice sentiment.
Unfortunately there's a not too small contingent of people who believe that sex education = abstinence education leading to people who will have sex without proper protection.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682276</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31689636</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>misexistentialist</author>
	<datestamp>1270058400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The reason extramarital sex was once considered immoral was because it often resulted in pregnancy. Since that is no longer true the Catholic Church doctrine is what should be described as "ignorant crap." We could talk about how the Popes' continued opposition is grounded in the lust for worldly power and how it results in the evil of increased abortions, but really Catholic leaders have absolutely no authority in sexual matters anymore. Maybe in 500 years if they have kept it in their pants they can talk again about chastity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason extramarital sex was once considered immoral was because it often resulted in pregnancy .
Since that is no longer true the Catholic Church doctrine is what should be described as " ignorant crap .
" We could talk about how the Popes ' continued opposition is grounded in the lust for worldly power and how it results in the evil of increased abortions , but really Catholic leaders have absolutely no authority in sexual matters anymore .
Maybe in 500 years if they have kept it in their pants they can talk again about chastity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason extramarital sex was once considered immoral was because it often resulted in pregnancy.
Since that is no longer true the Catholic Church doctrine is what should be described as "ignorant crap.
" We could talk about how the Popes' continued opposition is grounded in the lust for worldly power and how it results in the evil of increased abortions, but really Catholic leaders have absolutely no authority in sexual matters anymore.
Maybe in 500 years if they have kept it in their pants they can talk again about chastity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684604</id>
	<title>Celibacy might suck in some respects...</title>
	<author>petrus4</author>
	<datestamp>1270029780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...but it does have other fringe benefits.</p><p>If this does turn out to be another pandemic, there's a very simple vaccine for it, kids.  Keep your pants on.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...but it does have other fringe benefits.If this does turn out to be another pandemic , there 's a very simple vaccine for it , kids .
Keep your pants on .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but it does have other fringe benefits.If this does turn out to be another pandemic, there's a very simple vaccine for it, kids.
Keep your pants on.
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683476</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>nacturation</author>
	<datestamp>1269975900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Catholics having extramarital sex aren't acting within the tenants of their faith...</p></div><p>Perhaps not tenet, but certainly you might be within a tenant.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Catholics having extramarital sex are n't acting within the tenants of their faith...Perhaps not tenet , but certainly you might be within a tenant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Catholics having extramarital sex aren't acting within the tenants of their faith...Perhaps not tenet, but certainly you might be within a tenant.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683966</id>
	<title>Cancer</title>
	<author>komap</author>
	<datestamp>1270066740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why is this story tagged as "cancer"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is this story tagged as " cancer " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is this story tagged as "cancer"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684446</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270028220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's discouraged, but not outright forbidden.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's discouraged , but not outright forbidden .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's discouraged, but not outright forbidden.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683294</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269973980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But how can you marry a young boy ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But how can you marry a young boy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But how can you marry a young boy ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230</id>
	<title>Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269965700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't really decide, here.</p><p>On the one hand, if you're playing around without wearing a condom, then you're a Darwin Award.  On the other hand, this could be exceptionally nasty in third world nations, especially in places where condoms aren't available or expensive.  Now it's Nature's Reset Button.  And if the people are listening to a religious restriction, saying condom use is against their faith, now we're back to the Darwin angle.</p><p>Either way, you're screwed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't really decide , here.On the one hand , if you 're playing around without wearing a condom , then you 're a Darwin Award .
On the other hand , this could be exceptionally nasty in third world nations , especially in places where condoms are n't available or expensive .
Now it 's Nature 's Reset Button .
And if the people are listening to a religious restriction , saying condom use is against their faith , now we 're back to the Darwin angle.Either way , you 're screwed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't really decide, here.On the one hand, if you're playing around without wearing a condom, then you're a Darwin Award.
On the other hand, this could be exceptionally nasty in third world nations, especially in places where condoms aren't available or expensive.
Now it's Nature's Reset Button.
And if the people are listening to a religious restriction, saying condom use is against their faith, now we're back to the Darwin angle.Either way, you're screwed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685504</id>
	<title>Superbug?</title>
	<author>Jake S Griffin</author>
	<datestamp>1270038720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well I for one welcome our new gonorrhean overlords...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well I for one welcome our new gonorrhean overlords.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well I for one welcome our new gonorrhean overlords...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682240</id>
	<title>Socially Fucked</title>
	<author>cosm</author>
	<datestamp>1269965820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps in the eyes of the overlords, or perhaps evolution, STDs are a "feature not a bug" situation, a form population control. Reducing numbers through the attempt to increase numbers. I wonder if we should start including a Trojan constant in our population growth and decay models.

Combined with the <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/03/25/1525208/Facebook-Leads-To-Increase-In-STDs-in-Britain" title="slashdot.org">social network clusterfuck</a> [slashdot.org], perhaps we need a digital vaccine. Hope your not allergic to <a href="http://us.trendmicro.com/us/home/" title="trendmicro.com">PCillin</a> [trendmicro.com].<br> <br>
While on this line of thought, I would liken using Norton to wearing 8 condoms, all which having been poked with a needle, and Spybot Search &amp; Destroy being the "Pull-Out" contraceptive method, and disconnecting from the internet altogether being like a hysterectomy. Unfortunately, we can't forget Live OneCare, which is like wrapping it with toilet paper, drinking a fifth of tequila, taking two viagras, and then wandering around Mexico City.<br> <br>What was my point again?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps in the eyes of the overlords , or perhaps evolution , STDs are a " feature not a bug " situation , a form population control .
Reducing numbers through the attempt to increase numbers .
I wonder if we should start including a Trojan constant in our population growth and decay models .
Combined with the social network clusterfuck [ slashdot.org ] , perhaps we need a digital vaccine .
Hope your not allergic to PCillin [ trendmicro.com ] .
While on this line of thought , I would liken using Norton to wearing 8 condoms , all which having been poked with a needle , and Spybot Search &amp; Destroy being the " Pull-Out " contraceptive method , and disconnecting from the internet altogether being like a hysterectomy .
Unfortunately , we ca n't forget Live OneCare , which is like wrapping it with toilet paper , drinking a fifth of tequila , taking two viagras , and then wandering around Mexico City .
What was my point again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps in the eyes of the overlords, or perhaps evolution, STDs are a "feature not a bug" situation, a form population control.
Reducing numbers through the attempt to increase numbers.
I wonder if we should start including a Trojan constant in our population growth and decay models.
Combined with the social network clusterfuck [slashdot.org], perhaps we need a digital vaccine.
Hope your not allergic to PCillin [trendmicro.com].
While on this line of thought, I would liken using Norton to wearing 8 condoms, all which having been poked with a needle, and Spybot Search &amp; Destroy being the "Pull-Out" contraceptive method, and disconnecting from the internet altogether being like a hysterectomy.
Unfortunately, we can't forget Live OneCare, which is like wrapping it with toilet paper, drinking a fifth of tequila, taking two viagras, and then wandering around Mexico City.
What was my point again?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31688730</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>zstlaw</author>
	<datestamp>1270054440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most of the pregnant teens in my high school wore abstinence promise rings.  It was a guarantee that prom sex was going to be unprotected.  A bunch of girls in my gifted class got knocked up around homecoming.</p><p>Saying abstinence works if you ignore people not using it properly is just wrong.  Even if you ignore the fact that less than half of all teens using abstinence use it properly.  Overall abstinence has a user-failure rate between 26 and 86 percent.  (http://www.sexetc.org/story/2043)  Abstinence is a technique 5 times more likely to fail than a condom after proper sexual education.</p><p>What we need is REAL sex education with real discussion of complications diseases and how profoundly pregnancies can impact your life.  The best pregnancy prevention tool in every nation has always been education.  As women get more education the pregnancy rates decline as people decide to wait until it is appropriate to have kids.</p><p>Bush saw pregnancy rates climb 3\% under his abstinence-only leadership.  (http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2010-01-26-1Ateenpregnancy26\_ST\_N.htm) Pregnancy and abortion rated ended a decade long decline with the promotion of abstinence.  Studies show abstinence is considerably worse than sex education in preventing sex and teenage pregnancy. (http://ari.ucsf.edu/science/reports/abstinence.pdf)</p><p>There was a great report I can not find right now that showed how poorly the US fairs.  We are right up there with India, Niger, and Indonesia in teenage pregnancy.  Compared to Europe, the US promotes abstinence more heavily and yet sex starts earlier and is more likely to be unprotected than other countries.  Pregnancy rates are 2 to 8 times higher than most of Western countries. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teenage\_pregnancy.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of the pregnant teens in my high school wore abstinence promise rings .
It was a guarantee that prom sex was going to be unprotected .
A bunch of girls in my gifted class got knocked up around homecoming.Saying abstinence works if you ignore people not using it properly is just wrong .
Even if you ignore the fact that less than half of all teens using abstinence use it properly .
Overall abstinence has a user-failure rate between 26 and 86 percent .
( http : //www.sexetc.org/story/2043 ) Abstinence is a technique 5 times more likely to fail than a condom after proper sexual education.What we need is REAL sex education with real discussion of complications diseases and how profoundly pregnancies can impact your life .
The best pregnancy prevention tool in every nation has always been education .
As women get more education the pregnancy rates decline as people decide to wait until it is appropriate to have kids.Bush saw pregnancy rates climb 3 \ % under his abstinence-only leadership .
( http : //www.usatoday.com/news/health/2010-01-26-1Ateenpregnancy26 \ _ST \ _N.htm ) Pregnancy and abortion rated ended a decade long decline with the promotion of abstinence .
Studies show abstinence is considerably worse than sex education in preventing sex and teenage pregnancy .
( http : //ari.ucsf.edu/science/reports/abstinence.pdf ) There was a great report I can not find right now that showed how poorly the US fairs .
We are right up there with India , Niger , and Indonesia in teenage pregnancy .
Compared to Europe , the US promotes abstinence more heavily and yet sex starts earlier and is more likely to be unprotected than other countries .
Pregnancy rates are 2 to 8 times higher than most of Western countries .
( http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teenage \ _pregnancy. )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of the pregnant teens in my high school wore abstinence promise rings.
It was a guarantee that prom sex was going to be unprotected.
A bunch of girls in my gifted class got knocked up around homecoming.Saying abstinence works if you ignore people not using it properly is just wrong.
Even if you ignore the fact that less than half of all teens using abstinence use it properly.
Overall abstinence has a user-failure rate between 26 and 86 percent.
(http://www.sexetc.org/story/2043)  Abstinence is a technique 5 times more likely to fail than a condom after proper sexual education.What we need is REAL sex education with real discussion of complications diseases and how profoundly pregnancies can impact your life.
The best pregnancy prevention tool in every nation has always been education.
As women get more education the pregnancy rates decline as people decide to wait until it is appropriate to have kids.Bush saw pregnancy rates climb 3\% under his abstinence-only leadership.
(http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2010-01-26-1Ateenpregnancy26\_ST\_N.htm) Pregnancy and abortion rated ended a decade long decline with the promotion of abstinence.
Studies show abstinence is considerably worse than sex education in preventing sex and teenage pregnancy.
(http://ari.ucsf.edu/science/reports/abstinence.pdf)There was a great report I can not find right now that showed how poorly the US fairs.
We are right up there with India, Niger, and Indonesia in teenage pregnancy.
Compared to Europe, the US promotes abstinence more heavily and yet sex starts earlier and is more likely to be unprotected than other countries.
Pregnancy rates are 2 to 8 times higher than most of Western countries.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teenage\_pregnancy.)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682744</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>Animaether</author>
	<datestamp>1269969180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Live a little! Spread herpes!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... wait, what?</p><p>The 2nd comment I saw in here was from some guy suggesting that using a condom and not sleeping with 'just anyone' was living a dull life.  They got +4 Insightful (at the time of this writing).  I'm not sure what to make of that.</p><p>Is it truly the case that in the U.S. (presumption based on the current time) condoms and/or not having sex with 'just anyone' is so disregarded as to deriding it being hailed with a "hear, hear!" ?</p><p>I didn't think that potentially getting - or spreading - an STD was something that should be hailed as a virtue.. nevermind the basic statement suggesting that in order to 'live a little', the aforementioned is a totally acceptable risk.</p><p>Of course prevention can be taken to an extreme as well - but to see the basic suggestion of using a condom and/or not sleeping around with random-persons-A-through-Z so belittled as it is, I'm going to have to say it's rather obvious why the vast majority of STDs aren't on a decline; and in fact on the rise.  No wonder every time I'm staying in the U.S. and flick a hotel TV on I'm met with there-is-no-cure-for-herpes ads in practically every commercial break - it must be a booming business.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Live a little !
Spread herpes !
... wait , what ? The 2nd comment I saw in here was from some guy suggesting that using a condom and not sleeping with 'just anyone ' was living a dull life .
They got + 4 Insightful ( at the time of this writing ) .
I 'm not sure what to make of that.Is it truly the case that in the U.S. ( presumption based on the current time ) condoms and/or not having sex with 'just anyone ' is so disregarded as to deriding it being hailed with a " hear , hear !
" ? I did n't think that potentially getting - or spreading - an STD was something that should be hailed as a virtue.. nevermind the basic statement suggesting that in order to 'live a little ' , the aforementioned is a totally acceptable risk.Of course prevention can be taken to an extreme as well - but to see the basic suggestion of using a condom and/or not sleeping around with random-persons-A-through-Z so belittled as it is , I 'm going to have to say it 's rather obvious why the vast majority of STDs are n't on a decline ; and in fact on the rise .
No wonder every time I 'm staying in the U.S. and flick a hotel TV on I 'm met with there-is-no-cure-for-herpes ads in practically every commercial break - it must be a booming business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Live a little!
Spread herpes!
... wait, what?The 2nd comment I saw in here was from some guy suggesting that using a condom and not sleeping with 'just anyone' was living a dull life.
They got +4 Insightful (at the time of this writing).
I'm not sure what to make of that.Is it truly the case that in the U.S. (presumption based on the current time) condoms and/or not having sex with 'just anyone' is so disregarded as to deriding it being hailed with a "hear, hear!
" ?I didn't think that potentially getting - or spreading - an STD was something that should be hailed as a virtue.. nevermind the basic statement suggesting that in order to 'live a little', the aforementioned is a totally acceptable risk.Of course prevention can be taken to an extreme as well - but to see the basic suggestion of using a condom and/or not sleeping around with random-persons-A-through-Z so belittled as it is, I'm going to have to say it's rather obvious why the vast majority of STDs aren't on a decline; and in fact on the rise.
No wonder every time I'm staying in the U.S. and flick a hotel TV on I'm met with there-is-no-cure-for-herpes ads in practically every commercial break - it must be a booming business.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31686824</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270046880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But if a Catholic didn't want to act completely outside the tenants of their faith, they'd have oral sex (the compromise sex).  And I bet you they wouldn't use a condom.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But if a Catholic did n't want to act completely outside the tenants of their faith , they 'd have oral sex ( the compromise sex ) .
And I bet you they would n't use a condom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But if a Catholic didn't want to act completely outside the tenants of their faith, they'd have oral sex (the compromise sex).
And I bet you they wouldn't use a condom.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682426</id>
	<title>An STD the next super-bug?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269966840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clearly, the geeks shall inherit the Earth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly , the geeks shall inherit the Earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly, the geeks shall inherit the Earth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683292</id>
	<title>No worries!</title>
	<author>metiscus</author>
	<datestamp>1269973920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Noone on here has anything to worry about!! It is an STD.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Noone on here has anything to worry about ! !
It is an STD .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Noone on here has anything to worry about!!
It is an STD.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682768</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>Dave114</author>
	<datestamp>1269969420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Do you really think it's self-righteous, hedonistic, and narcissistic to have sex? It's how you got here.</p><p>Live a little!</p></div></blockquote><p>I suspect that what the original poster was getting at was a lack of casual sex / promiscuity - which takes some level of self-discipline.</p><p>Having at most one sexual partner to whom you're faithful negates the risk.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you really think it 's self-righteous , hedonistic , and narcissistic to have sex ?
It 's how you got here.Live a little ! I suspect that what the original poster was getting at was a lack of casual sex / promiscuity - which takes some level of self-discipline.Having at most one sexual partner to whom you 're faithful negates the risk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you really think it's self-righteous, hedonistic, and narcissistic to have sex?
It's how you got here.Live a little!I suspect that what the original poster was getting at was a lack of casual sex / promiscuity - which takes some level of self-discipline.Having at most one sexual partner to whom you're faithful negates the risk.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683142</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>reverseengineer</author>
	<datestamp>1269972900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Except when complications arise, gonorrhea generally does not get serious enough to actually kill people.  It has historically been an aggressive nuisance, but not a great plague even before the discovery of penicillin.  Of course, without proper courses of treatment, there would be more complications: there would be occasional cases of gonorrhea developing into heart and brain infections, cases of it causing pelvic inflammatory disease in women, but mostly we'd hear about newborns blinded a few days after birth.  It's not just a disease of lust, you know.  "Superbug" status aside, we do have plenty of drugs still in the pharmacy that will be able to treat resistant infections. Ceftriaxone and cefixime are third generation cephalosporins; the fourth generation have started seeing service.

<br> <br>One issue is that many of the new and remaining drugs are IV only; from the discovery of penicillin on, gonorrhea has usually been something you filled a prescription and took a pill to treat (of course, in such places where medicine was available).  Also, while drug resistance in <i>Neisseria gonorrhoeae </i> is certainly a problem, a concern on the horizon is having its relative <i>Neisseria meningitidis</i>, the causative agent of meningococcal meningitis, develop resistance to cephalosporin antibiotics.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except when complications arise , gonorrhea generally does not get serious enough to actually kill people .
It has historically been an aggressive nuisance , but not a great plague even before the discovery of penicillin .
Of course , without proper courses of treatment , there would be more complications : there would be occasional cases of gonorrhea developing into heart and brain infections , cases of it causing pelvic inflammatory disease in women , but mostly we 'd hear about newborns blinded a few days after birth .
It 's not just a disease of lust , you know .
" Superbug " status aside , we do have plenty of drugs still in the pharmacy that will be able to treat resistant infections .
Ceftriaxone and cefixime are third generation cephalosporins ; the fourth generation have started seeing service .
One issue is that many of the new and remaining drugs are IV only ; from the discovery of penicillin on , gonorrhea has usually been something you filled a prescription and took a pill to treat ( of course , in such places where medicine was available ) .
Also , while drug resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae is certainly a problem , a concern on the horizon is having its relative Neisseria meningitidis , the causative agent of meningococcal meningitis , develop resistance to cephalosporin antibiotics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except when complications arise, gonorrhea generally does not get serious enough to actually kill people.
It has historically been an aggressive nuisance, but not a great plague even before the discovery of penicillin.
Of course, without proper courses of treatment, there would be more complications: there would be occasional cases of gonorrhea developing into heart and brain infections, cases of it causing pelvic inflammatory disease in women, but mostly we'd hear about newborns blinded a few days after birth.
It's not just a disease of lust, you know.
"Superbug" status aside, we do have plenty of drugs still in the pharmacy that will be able to treat resistant infections.
Ceftriaxone and cefixime are third generation cephalosporins; the fourth generation have started seeing service.
One issue is that many of the new and remaining drugs are IV only; from the discovery of penicillin on, gonorrhea has usually been something you filled a prescription and took a pill to treat (of course, in such places where medicine was available).
Also, while drug resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae  is certainly a problem, a concern on the horizon is having its relative Neisseria meningitidis, the causative agent of meningococcal meningitis, develop resistance to cephalosporin antibiotics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685442</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Velex</author>
	<datestamp>1270038000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Abstinence is the best (well, most effective) preventative measure.</p></div><p>
In theory, that is.  In practice, it's the least effective.  Maybe I'll track down the evidence to support my claim later today, but I've noticed the more religious a family is, the more likely all their daughters are going to be baby-mammas, which become drains on society (no, I'm not being misogynist because I can).
</p><p>
That being said, there was someone else here who said it best, but I don't remember off the top of my head.  Basically, using abstinence to prevent pregnancy and STDs is like not driving a car to prevent car accidents.  It's a great idea in theory, but good luck with that.
</p><p>
Of course, hell, I'm posting to Slashdot.  Abstinence has worked for me my whole life.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Abstinence is the best ( well , most effective ) preventative measure .
In theory , that is .
In practice , it 's the least effective .
Maybe I 'll track down the evidence to support my claim later today , but I 've noticed the more religious a family is , the more likely all their daughters are going to be baby-mammas , which become drains on society ( no , I 'm not being misogynist because I can ) .
That being said , there was someone else here who said it best , but I do n't remember off the top of my head .
Basically , using abstinence to prevent pregnancy and STDs is like not driving a car to prevent car accidents .
It 's a great idea in theory , but good luck with that .
Of course , hell , I 'm posting to Slashdot .
Abstinence has worked for me my whole life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Abstinence is the best (well, most effective) preventative measure.
In theory, that is.
In practice, it's the least effective.
Maybe I'll track down the evidence to support my claim later today, but I've noticed the more religious a family is, the more likely all their daughters are going to be baby-mammas, which become drains on society (no, I'm not being misogynist because I can).
That being said, there was someone else here who said it best, but I don't remember off the top of my head.
Basically, using abstinence to prevent pregnancy and STDs is like not driving a car to prevent car accidents.
It's a great idea in theory, but good luck with that.
Of course, hell, I'm posting to Slashdot.
Abstinence has worked for me my whole life.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685366</id>
	<title>Re:On the bright side</title>
	<author>DarkIye</author>
	<datestamp>1270037340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ho ho ho ho HO HO HO. Nobody's made THAT fucking joke before.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ho ho ho ho HO HO HO .
Nobody 's made THAT fucking joke before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ho ho ho ho HO HO HO.
Nobody's made THAT fucking joke before.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683410</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>thatskinnyguy</author>
	<datestamp>1269975060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hehe... You said OVERCOME. Didn't know that was possible.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hehe... You said OVERCOME .
Did n't know that was possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hehe... You said OVERCOME.
Didn't know that was possible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682182</id>
	<title>Let us clap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269965400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>For the Claps big return</htmltext>
<tokenext>For the Claps big return</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the Claps big return</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683330</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Nadaka</author>
	<datestamp>1269974400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i would not recommend licking Gonorrhea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i would not recommend licking Gonorrhea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i would not recommend licking Gonorrhea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31687944</id>
	<title>So what....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270051260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdot is supposed to be news FOR nerds. Like anyone here is at risk of getting Gonhorrhea...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot is supposed to be news FOR nerds .
Like anyone here is at risk of getting Gonhorrhea.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot is supposed to be news FOR nerds.
Like anyone here is at risk of getting Gonhorrhea...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683994</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270067160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stop being a cheapskate and buying condoms in bulk at the bargain bins. Start paying a little more to buy the thin models, learn how to apply them properly, actually invest time in a little foreplay, and you'll find out you can still get most of the same pleasure from sex with minimal risk of pregnancy or STD. I guess the exception is if you're (biologically constrained or voluntarily) packing fudge as your main sexual activity, in which case I have heard that condoms do make a big difference. But that's really a relatively small fraction of the population.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stop being a cheapskate and buying condoms in bulk at the bargain bins .
Start paying a little more to buy the thin models , learn how to apply them properly , actually invest time in a little foreplay , and you 'll find out you can still get most of the same pleasure from sex with minimal risk of pregnancy or STD .
I guess the exception is if you 're ( biologically constrained or voluntarily ) packing fudge as your main sexual activity , in which case I have heard that condoms do make a big difference .
But that 's really a relatively small fraction of the population .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stop being a cheapskate and buying condoms in bulk at the bargain bins.
Start paying a little more to buy the thin models, learn how to apply them properly, actually invest time in a little foreplay, and you'll find out you can still get most of the same pleasure from sex with minimal risk of pregnancy or STD.
I guess the exception is if you're (biologically constrained or voluntarily) packing fudge as your main sexual activity, in which case I have heard that condoms do make a big difference.
But that's really a relatively small fraction of the population.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682126</id>
	<title>I've got the cure</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269965100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've got the cure!</p><p>It's called a condom and not screwing nasty hoes!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've got the cure ! It 's called a condom and not screwing nasty hoes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've got the cure!It's called a condom and not screwing nasty hoes!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683420</id>
	<title>Gonorrhea: Nature's Birth Control</title>
	<author>Tony Stark</author>
	<datestamp>1269975240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you have gonorrhea long enough it can cause sterility.  I think if it becomes resistant to antibiotics, this is nature's way of telling us "hey, it's ok to have lots of sex because you can't get anyone pregnant now."  You get it, they can't cure it for a while so you live with it till they come up with a new cure, in the meantime you became sterile.  Thanks, mother nature!</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you have gonorrhea long enough it can cause sterility .
I think if it becomes resistant to antibiotics , this is nature 's way of telling us " hey , it 's ok to have lots of sex because you ca n't get anyone pregnant now .
" You get it , they ca n't cure it for a while so you live with it till they come up with a new cure , in the meantime you became sterile .
Thanks , mother nature !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you have gonorrhea long enough it can cause sterility.
I think if it becomes resistant to antibiotics, this is nature's way of telling us "hey, it's ok to have lots of sex because you can't get anyone pregnant now.
"  You get it, they can't cure it for a while so you live with it till they come up with a new cure, in the meantime you became sterile.
Thanks, mother nature!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683458</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269975660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where's the ignorant crap?  He said some religions are against condom use.  You mentioned one: Catholicism.</p><p>True, extramarital sex is <i>also</i> frowned upon by Catholicism, but I didn't see anything about that at all in his post.  What happens in the real world is that it's awfully easy to be a "good Catholic" by not wearing a condom, but really hard to do it by not having sex.  Hey, might as well not piss off God ALL the way, right?  Again, in the real world the anti-condom stance means that kids may not be taught how to use condoms properly, not taught how important it is to use one if you're going to have sex, or a not-so-good Catholic might just not have them around.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where 's the ignorant crap ?
He said some religions are against condom use .
You mentioned one : Catholicism.True , extramarital sex is also frowned upon by Catholicism , but I did n't see anything about that at all in his post .
What happens in the real world is that it 's awfully easy to be a " good Catholic " by not wearing a condom , but really hard to do it by not having sex .
Hey , might as well not piss off God ALL the way , right ?
Again , in the real world the anti-condom stance means that kids may not be taught how to use condoms properly , not taught how important it is to use one if you 're going to have sex , or a not-so-good Catholic might just not have them around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where's the ignorant crap?
He said some religions are against condom use.
You mentioned one: Catholicism.True, extramarital sex is also frowned upon by Catholicism, but I didn't see anything about that at all in his post.
What happens in the real world is that it's awfully easy to be a "good Catholic" by not wearing a condom, but really hard to do it by not having sex.
Hey, might as well not piss off God ALL the way, right?
Again, in the real world the anti-condom stance means that kids may not be taught how to use condoms properly, not taught how important it is to use one if you're going to have sex, or a not-so-good Catholic might just not have them around.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31689242</id>
	<title>Re:An STD the next super-bug?</title>
	<author>Cyrano de Maniac</author>
	<datestamp>1270056720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And then die off within a generation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And then die off within a generation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And then die off within a generation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31693408</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>SpaceCadets</author>
	<datestamp>1270029900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd rather have David Tennant within me, but hey.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd rather have David Tennant within me , but hey .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd rather have David Tennant within me, but hey.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682716</id>
	<title>this story is about a month and a half late</title>
	<author>slashgimp</author>
	<datestamp>1269968940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...I can't possibly be the only one who has wished people "Happy VD!" on Valentine's Day<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p><p>hehe</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...I ca n't possibly be the only one who has wished people " Happy VD !
" on Valentine 's Day : Dhehe</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I can't possibly be the only one who has wished people "Happy VD!
" on Valentine's Day :Dhehe</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683104</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269972600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, you're right! Catholics are the only religious types who say prophelactics are against their religion. Thanks for clearing that up for us!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , you 're right !
Catholics are the only religious types who say prophelactics are against their religion .
Thanks for clearing that up for us !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, you're right!
Catholics are the only religious types who say prophelactics are against their religion.
Thanks for clearing that up for us!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684084</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270068240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Abstinence is like communism: in a perfect world, it'd work.</p></div><p>Worked pretty well for me until I got married.  And for most of the couples I know, in fact...</p><p>Abstinence as a teaching programme doesn't tend to work because it's teaching people things they already know (Hands up those that didn't know sexually transmitted diseases are, erm, sexually transmitted?  Hands up those who didn't know that most major religions recommend waiting til your married?).  Of course you're not going to have an effect by restating that.  What kept STI rates lower in the past was the social pressure not to have sex before marriage, even among the irreligious -- but the abstinence programmes' message to youth is effectively "You can choose to be pressured not to have sex, but can then opt out at any time because this is a free society and its your body after all and nobody's allowed to discriminate against you regardless".  That's so wishy washy as to be a complete waste of effort.</p><p>Abstinence itself, however, works every time -- how many people do you know that caught a sexually transmitted diseease without having sex?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Abstinence is like communism : in a perfect world , it 'd work.Worked pretty well for me until I got married .
And for most of the couples I know , in fact...Abstinence as a teaching programme does n't tend to work because it 's teaching people things they already know ( Hands up those that did n't know sexually transmitted diseases are , erm , sexually transmitted ?
Hands up those who did n't know that most major religions recommend waiting til your married ? ) .
Of course you 're not going to have an effect by restating that .
What kept STI rates lower in the past was the social pressure not to have sex before marriage , even among the irreligious -- but the abstinence programmes ' message to youth is effectively " You can choose to be pressured not to have sex , but can then opt out at any time because this is a free society and its your body after all and nobody 's allowed to discriminate against you regardless " .
That 's so wishy washy as to be a complete waste of effort.Abstinence itself , however , works every time -- how many people do you know that caught a sexually transmitted diseease without having sex ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Abstinence is like communism: in a perfect world, it'd work.Worked pretty well for me until I got married.
And for most of the couples I know, in fact...Abstinence as a teaching programme doesn't tend to work because it's teaching people things they already know (Hands up those that didn't know sexually transmitted diseases are, erm, sexually transmitted?
Hands up those who didn't know that most major religions recommend waiting til your married?).
Of course you're not going to have an effect by restating that.
What kept STI rates lower in the past was the social pressure not to have sex before marriage, even among the irreligious -- but the abstinence programmes' message to youth is effectively "You can choose to be pressured not to have sex, but can then opt out at any time because this is a free society and its your body after all and nobody's allowed to discriminate against you regardless".
That's so wishy washy as to be a complete waste of effort.Abstinence itself, however, works every time -- how many people do you know that caught a sexually transmitted diseease without having sex?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685918</id>
	<title>Re:Let us clap</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1270042080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or even better, celebrate with a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDeRYmB4t6Q" title="youtube.com">jaunty tune</a> [youtube.com] by the great Tom Lehrer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or even better , celebrate with a jaunty tune [ youtube.com ] by the great Tom Lehrer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or even better, celebrate with a jaunty tune [youtube.com] by the great Tom Lehrer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31686046</id>
	<title>I thought we had that one licked.</title>
	<author>Type44Q</author>
	<datestamp>1270042800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"I thought we had that one licked."
<p>Hope not.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I thought we had that one licked .
" Hope not .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I thought we had that one licked.
"
Hope not.
:P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683898</id>
	<title>So kids you heard what the doctor said</title>
	<author>CxDoo</author>
	<datestamp>1270066140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't fuck with gonorrhea!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't fuck with gonorrhea !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't fuck with gonorrhea!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31686112</id>
	<title>Levels of quality:</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1270043160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>- Hard mathematical fact, checked and reviewed for decades.<br>- Proven by several peer-reviewed experiments of competing teams.<br>- Proven by one peer-reviewed experiment.<br>- One experiment found that...<br>- One study found that...<br>- An expert committee agrees, that...<br><em>- An &ldquo;expert&rdquo;* says, that... (* our definition of &ldquo;expert&rdquo;)</em><br>- In a poll with 3\% of the population (9.35 million people), 70\% of the people think that...<br>- 66\% of the people we asked confirm that... (* We have asked about 80 people, and possibly paid them)<br>- We/I think this is great!<br>- It&rsquo;s got electrolytes! It&rsquo;s what plants crave!<br>- This product does not contain any thermonuclear or biochemical weapons! (* No guarantees!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>- Hard mathematical fact , checked and reviewed for decades.- Proven by several peer-reviewed experiments of competing teams.- Proven by one peer-reviewed experiment.- One experiment found that...- One study found that...- An expert committee agrees , that...- An    expert    * says , that... ( * our definition of    expert    ) - In a poll with 3 \ % of the population ( 9.35 million people ) , 70 \ % of the people think that...- 66 \ % of the people we asked confirm that... ( * We have asked about 80 people , and possibly paid them ) - We/I think this is great ! - It    s got electrolytes !
It    s what plants crave ! - This product does not contain any thermonuclear or biochemical weapons !
( * No guarantees !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>- Hard mathematical fact, checked and reviewed for decades.- Proven by several peer-reviewed experiments of competing teams.- Proven by one peer-reviewed experiment.- One experiment found that...- One study found that...- An expert committee agrees, that...- An “expert”* says, that... (* our definition of “expert”)- In a poll with 3\% of the population (9.35 million people), 70\% of the people think that...- 66\% of the people we asked confirm that... (* We have asked about 80 people, and possibly paid them)- We/I think this is great!- It’s got electrolytes!
It’s what plants crave!- This product does not contain any thermonuclear or biochemical weapons!
(* No guarantees!
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682968</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Vellmont</author>
	<datestamp>1269971340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i><br>What your anecdote shows is that there should probably be a greater emphasis placed on STDs and the possibility of infection via oral sex in current sex ed.<br></i><br>This is not news.  The \_only\_ reason we're even seriously talking about abstinence is because the conservative Christians in this country want to put their heads in the sand and believe it can actually be effective, or if it's not it's some kind of moral failing.  They'll fight your proposal tooth and nail because they seriously believe that talking about condoms and oral sex would harm society.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What your anecdote shows is that there should probably be a greater emphasis placed on STDs and the possibility of infection via oral sex in current sex ed.This is not news .
The \ _only \ _ reason we 're even seriously talking about abstinence is because the conservative Christians in this country want to put their heads in the sand and believe it can actually be effective , or if it 's not it 's some kind of moral failing .
They 'll fight your proposal tooth and nail because they seriously believe that talking about condoms and oral sex would harm society .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What your anecdote shows is that there should probably be a greater emphasis placed on STDs and the possibility of infection via oral sex in current sex ed.This is not news.
The \_only\_ reason we're even seriously talking about abstinence is because the conservative Christians in this country want to put their heads in the sand and believe it can actually be effective, or if it's not it's some kind of moral failing.
They'll fight your proposal tooth and nail because they seriously believe that talking about condoms and oral sex would harm society.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685756</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270040760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perfect world? Abstinence means not having sex, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perfect world ?
Abstinence means not having sex , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perfect world?
Abstinence means not having sex, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683492</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269976140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But you see, most of us aren't so desperate to believe the catholic church's bs that we have the common sense to know--as do you--that it is more likely that telling someone to use a condom if they have sex is going to be more effective than telling them to just not have sex...I mean, COME ON...you aren't that sheltered, are you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But you see , most of us are n't so desperate to believe the catholic church 's bs that we have the common sense to know--as do you--that it is more likely that telling someone to use a condom if they have sex is going to be more effective than telling them to just not have sex...I mean , COME ON...you are n't that sheltered , are you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But you see, most of us aren't so desperate to believe the catholic church's bs that we have the common sense to know--as do you--that it is more likely that telling someone to use a condom if they have sex is going to be more effective than telling them to just not have sex...I mean, COME ON...you aren't that sheltered, are you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682170</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>blankaBrew</author>
	<datestamp>1269965340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I doubt that this would be an issue for the average slashdot reader.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt that this would be an issue for the average slashdot reader .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt that this would be an issue for the average slashdot reader.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682446</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269966960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wholeheartedly agree.</p><p>As a Slashdot reader, I feel I am uniquely situated to speak about abstinence, because unlike all those hypocritical politicians, I obviously practice what I preach. In my experience the best way to avoid getting gonorrhea is to live in your mother's basement and play World of Warcraft.</p><p>There's only one thing you have to be careful about: you mustn't let your mother come down there. After a while you get pretty desperate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wholeheartedly agree.As a Slashdot reader , I feel I am uniquely situated to speak about abstinence , because unlike all those hypocritical politicians , I obviously practice what I preach .
In my experience the best way to avoid getting gonorrhea is to live in your mother 's basement and play World of Warcraft.There 's only one thing you have to be careful about : you must n't let your mother come down there .
After a while you get pretty desperate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wholeheartedly agree.As a Slashdot reader, I feel I am uniquely situated to speak about abstinence, because unlike all those hypocritical politicians, I obviously practice what I preach.
In my experience the best way to avoid getting gonorrhea is to live in your mother's basement and play World of Warcraft.There's only one thing you have to be careful about: you mustn't let your mother come down there.
After a while you get pretty desperate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684406</id>
	<title>That's what happens</title>
	<author>nixofortune</author>
	<datestamp>1270027920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's what happens when product released to the masses. It becomes the super product.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what happens when product released to the masses .
It becomes the super product .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what happens when product released to the masses.
It becomes the super product.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31696080</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>markov\_chain</author>
	<datestamp>1270044480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It was common for strange women to walk up to me in the supermarket and casually say "wanna fuck?" I kid you not.</p></div></blockquote><p>This still happens to me even today.  Trouble is I usually wake up right after<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was common for strange women to walk up to me in the supermarket and casually say " wan na fuck ?
" I kid you not.This still happens to me even today .
Trouble is I usually wake up right after : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was common for strange women to walk up to me in the supermarket and casually say "wanna fuck?
" I kid you not.This still happens to me even today.
Trouble is I usually wake up right after :D
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31690926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31690926</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1270063680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You must be either</p><ol> <li>Very young</li><li>Happily married</li><li>A feminist (always blaming men, "keep your <b>pecker</b> in your pocket"</li><li>A religious nut or preacher</li><li>Completely without a sex drive for some other reason (a freak of nature)</li></ol><p>Did I miss any possibilities?</p><p>You obviously weren't an adult during the '70s when contraception was cheap and easy (there were IUDs back then, no need to have to remember to take a daily pill) and there were no uncurable STDs. That had never happened before in human history, and hasn't happened since. It was common for strange women to walk up to me in the supermarket and casually say "wanna fuck?" I kid you not. I always had to decline, as I was married (I no longer am, I hope they cure aids and bring back IUDs!).</p><p>You obviously do NOT read any history, either, and never heard of the "free love" movement in the 1920s.</p><p>To say that today's society is more hedonistic than any other time reeks of pure ignorance, which is why you WERE modded to oblivion; you're simply wrong, and insultingly and judgementally so. Speaking of which, if you're #4, leave a little extra in the collection plate and beg forgiveness; you know what Jesus said about being judgemental.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You must be either Very youngHappily marriedA feminist ( always blaming men , " keep your pecker in your pocket " A religious nut or preacherCompletely without a sex drive for some other reason ( a freak of nature ) Did I miss any possibilities ? You obviously were n't an adult during the '70s when contraception was cheap and easy ( there were IUDs back then , no need to have to remember to take a daily pill ) and there were no uncurable STDs .
That had never happened before in human history , and has n't happened since .
It was common for strange women to walk up to me in the supermarket and casually say " wan na fuck ?
" I kid you not .
I always had to decline , as I was married ( I no longer am , I hope they cure aids and bring back IUDs !
) .You obviously do NOT read any history , either , and never heard of the " free love " movement in the 1920s.To say that today 's society is more hedonistic than any other time reeks of pure ignorance , which is why you WERE modded to oblivion ; you 're simply wrong , and insultingly and judgementally so .
Speaking of which , if you 're # 4 , leave a little extra in the collection plate and beg forgiveness ; you know what Jesus said about being judgemental .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must be either Very youngHappily marriedA feminist (always blaming men, "keep your pecker in your pocket"A religious nut or preacherCompletely without a sex drive for some other reason (a freak of nature)Did I miss any possibilities?You obviously weren't an adult during the '70s when contraception was cheap and easy (there were IUDs back then, no need to have to remember to take a daily pill) and there were no uncurable STDs.
That had never happened before in human history, and hasn't happened since.
It was common for strange women to walk up to me in the supermarket and casually say "wanna fuck?
" I kid you not.
I always had to decline, as I was married (I no longer am, I hope they cure aids and bring back IUDs!
).You obviously do NOT read any history, either, and never heard of the "free love" movement in the 1920s.To say that today's society is more hedonistic than any other time reeks of pure ignorance, which is why you WERE modded to oblivion; you're simply wrong, and insultingly and judgementally so.
Speaking of which, if you're #4, leave a little extra in the collection plate and beg forgiveness; you know what Jesus said about being judgemental.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684314</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270027080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sure, and hormone-soaked teenagers whose brains are still trying to develop good impulse control always think rationally and choose abstinence when a member of their preferred sex is hot to trot for them. This is why abstinence-only education has been such a rousing success everywhere it's been tried.</p></div><p>It depends on the program.  "You might catch a disease, so you should wait, but of course it's your body and up to you" hasn't been particularly effective, that's certainly true.  But I'm told the "If I catch you mucking around with some girl, sonny jim, I'm going to thrash the bloody life out of you" program worked reasonably well for my grandparents.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , and hormone-soaked teenagers whose brains are still trying to develop good impulse control always think rationally and choose abstinence when a member of their preferred sex is hot to trot for them .
This is why abstinence-only education has been such a rousing success everywhere it 's been tried.It depends on the program .
" You might catch a disease , so you should wait , but of course it 's your body and up to you " has n't been particularly effective , that 's certainly true .
But I 'm told the " If I catch you mucking around with some girl , sonny jim , I 'm going to thrash the bloody life out of you " program worked reasonably well for my grandparents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, and hormone-soaked teenagers whose brains are still trying to develop good impulse control always think rationally and choose abstinence when a member of their preferred sex is hot to trot for them.
This is why abstinence-only education has been such a rousing success everywhere it's been tried.It depends on the program.
"You might catch a disease, so you should wait, but of course it's your body and up to you" hasn't been particularly effective, that's certainly true.
But I'm told the "If I catch you mucking around with some girl, sonny jim, I'm going to thrash the bloody life out of you" program worked reasonably well for my grandparents.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683028</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269971760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Gonorrhea? I thought we had that one licked.</p></div></blockquote><p>That's disgusting.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gonorrhea ?
I thought we had that one licked.That 's disgusting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gonorrhea?
I thought we had that one licked.That's disgusting.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685372</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Mjlner</author>
	<datestamp>1270037400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Abstinence is like communism: in a perfect world, it'd work.</p></div><p>Your idea of a perfect world is a world without sex???</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Abstinence is like communism : in a perfect world , it 'd work.Your idea of a perfect world is a world without sex ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Abstinence is like communism: in a perfect world, it'd work.Your idea of a perfect world is a world without sex??
?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682680</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>LordLucless</author>
	<datestamp>1269968700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hormone-soaked teenager brains already have all the physiological necessities for impulse control; what they don't have is any motivation to develop it, since excuses like the above are always made for them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hormone-soaked teenager brains already have all the physiological necessities for impulse control ; what they do n't have is any motivation to develop it , since excuses like the above are always made for them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hormone-soaked teenager brains already have all the physiological necessities for impulse control; what they don't have is any motivation to develop it, since excuses like the above are always made for them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31688898</id>
	<title>Catholic Church says sex for procreation only</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270055280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At the end, the Catholic Church no longer has any moral authority to lead in matters related to sexuality, the recent worldwide debacle regarding paedophile priests and the Church's attempt to brush this under the carpet is enough to allow them any moral authority.</p><p>On top of that, any other priests without such sick proclivities have absolutely no experience about how human sexuality works (they are celibate), so again, they know nothing about human sexuality for the simple fact that they have foregone to practice it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At the end , the Catholic Church no longer has any moral authority to lead in matters related to sexuality , the recent worldwide debacle regarding paedophile priests and the Church 's attempt to brush this under the carpet is enough to allow them any moral authority.On top of that , any other priests without such sick proclivities have absolutely no experience about how human sexuality works ( they are celibate ) , so again , they know nothing about human sexuality for the simple fact that they have foregone to practice it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At the end, the Catholic Church no longer has any moral authority to lead in matters related to sexuality, the recent worldwide debacle regarding paedophile priests and the Church's attempt to brush this under the carpet is enough to allow them any moral authority.On top of that, any other priests without such sick proclivities have absolutely no experience about how human sexuality works (they are celibate), so again, they know nothing about human sexuality for the simple fact that they have foregone to practice it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682858</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Therilith</author>
	<datestamp>1269970320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>split up by reasonable people and virginal nerds</p></div><p>
You callin' me unreasonable?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>split up by reasonable people and virginal nerds You callin ' me unreasonable ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>split up by reasonable people and virginal nerds
You callin' me unreasonable?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685668</id>
	<title>Re:No one loves you when you have the...</title>
	<author>tokul</author>
	<datestamp>1270039920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>hit them hard and don't let up until they are dead, dead, dead!</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
make sure that you don't die before they do. Lots of medicine can kill you too.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>hit them hard and do n't let up until they are dead , dead , dead !
make sure that you do n't die before they do .
Lots of medicine can kill you too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hit them hard and don't let up until they are dead, dead, dead!
make sure that you don't die before they do.
Lots of medicine can kill you too.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682750</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682782</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269969600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, it's a good thing that you have such great discipline regarding your sexuality.</p><p>Is there anything in yourlife that you consume even though you know it's bad for you?  Smoking?  Any particular food?  Or are you just the model of perfection with no vices whatsoever?  Or do instead lead the most boring life ever, and so never have to worry about these things?</p><p>This isn't about what should or what could be.  This is about the reality of things.  Nobody advocating sex ed will deny that abstinence is the only 100\% prevention for abstinence, but the reality is that some people will have sex in spite of the consequences, and so they are entitled to the most medically accurate info about it, and how things like condoms will mitigate the risks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , it 's a good thing that you have such great discipline regarding your sexuality.Is there anything in yourlife that you consume even though you know it 's bad for you ?
Smoking ? Any particular food ?
Or are you just the model of perfection with no vices whatsoever ?
Or do instead lead the most boring life ever , and so never have to worry about these things ? This is n't about what should or what could be .
This is about the reality of things .
Nobody advocating sex ed will deny that abstinence is the only 100 \ % prevention for abstinence , but the reality is that some people will have sex in spite of the consequences , and so they are entitled to the most medically accurate info about it , and how things like condoms will mitigate the risks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, it's a good thing that you have such great discipline regarding your sexuality.Is there anything in yourlife that you consume even though you know it's bad for you?
Smoking?  Any particular food?
Or are you just the model of perfection with no vices whatsoever?
Or do instead lead the most boring life ever, and so never have to worry about these things?This isn't about what should or what could be.
This is about the reality of things.
Nobody advocating sex ed will deny that abstinence is the only 100\% prevention for abstinence, but the reality is that some people will have sex in spite of the consequences, and so they are entitled to the most medically accurate info about it, and how things like condoms will mitigate the risks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682156</id>
	<title>On the bright side</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269965280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No one on slashdot will ever be exposed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No one on slashdot will ever be exposed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No one on slashdot will ever be exposed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683968</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270066740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Do you really think it's self-righteous, hedonistic, and narcissistic to have sex? It's how you got here.</p></div><p>Wow, slow down.You are going to get dizzy spinning those words around like that. Having sex with strangers with no intention of reproducing *is* hedonistic. It's all a matter of what your intent is. Besides, STDs are a good way to control people who have no self-control.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you really think it 's self-righteous , hedonistic , and narcissistic to have sex ?
It 's how you got here.Wow , slow down.You are going to get dizzy spinning those words around like that .
Having sex with strangers with no intention of reproducing * is * hedonistic .
It 's all a matter of what your intent is .
Besides , STDs are a good way to control people who have no self-control .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you really think it's self-righteous, hedonistic, and narcissistic to have sex?
It's how you got here.Wow, slow down.You are going to get dizzy spinning those words around like that.
Having sex with strangers with no intention of reproducing *is* hedonistic.
It's all a matter of what your intent is.
Besides, STDs are a good way to control people who have no self-control.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683464</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1269975720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My grandmother was excommunicated for marrying an Anglican and refusing to leave him when her priest told her she was living in sin.</p><p>Apparently the Catholic church has modernized a little since the middle of last century though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My grandmother was excommunicated for marrying an Anglican and refusing to leave him when her priest told her she was living in sin.Apparently the Catholic church has modernized a little since the middle of last century though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My grandmother was excommunicated for marrying an Anglican and refusing to leave him when her priest told her she was living in sin.Apparently the Catholic church has modernized a little since the middle of last century though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31690320</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1270061340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On the one hand, if you're playing around without wearing a condom, then you're <b>risking</b> a Darwin Award. On the other hand, if you use a condom every time you have sex in your life, you are <b>ensuring</b> a Darwin Award. If your genes don't survive your death (and everyone dies), you lose the Darwin Game.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the one hand , if you 're playing around without wearing a condom , then you 're risking a Darwin Award .
On the other hand , if you use a condom every time you have sex in your life , you are ensuring a Darwin Award .
If your genes do n't survive your death ( and everyone dies ) , you lose the Darwin Game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the one hand, if you're playing around without wearing a condom, then you're risking a Darwin Award.
On the other hand, if you use a condom every time you have sex in your life, you are ensuring a Darwin Award.
If your genes don't survive your death (and everyone dies), you lose the Darwin Game.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684794</id>
	<title>uro biofon</title>
	<author>McBooCZech</author>
	<datestamp>1270031400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Check uro biofon. It works great for me: <a href="http://www.biofon.ru/eng/uro/simptoms.shtml" title="biofon.ru" rel="nofollow">http://www.biofon.ru/eng/uro/simptoms.shtml</a> [biofon.ru]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Check uro biofon .
It works great for me : http : //www.biofon.ru/eng/uro/simptoms.shtml [ biofon.ru ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Check uro biofon.
It works great for me: http://www.biofon.ru/eng/uro/simptoms.shtml [biofon.ru]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682276</id>
	<title>Here's an idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269965940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Howsabout people stop having unprotected sex with people with gonorrhea? I realize that people may lie about not having it or something similar, but one's policy should be use a rubber unless one is very, very certain it's safe.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Howsabout people stop having unprotected sex with people with gonorrhea ?
I realize that people may lie about not having it or something similar , but one 's policy should be use a rubber unless one is very , very certain it 's safe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Howsabout people stop having unprotected sex with people with gonorrhea?
I realize that people may lie about not having it or something similar, but one's policy should be use a rubber unless one is very, very certain it's safe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683986</id>
	<title>Re:An STD the next super-bug?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270067040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah and the place will be a bit like that Will Smith movie where there's no one around - the streets are empty.</p><p>All the geeks will be home in their sub-basements playing world of warcraft or "wish i had a friend"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah and the place will be a bit like that Will Smith movie where there 's no one around - the streets are empty.All the geeks will be home in their sub-basements playing world of warcraft or " wish i had a friend "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah and the place will be a bit like that Will Smith movie where there's no one around - the streets are empty.All the geeks will be home in their sub-basements playing world of warcraft or "wish i had a friend"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684870</id>
	<title>So In Other Words...</title>
	<author>pandrijeczko</author>
	<datestamp>1270032180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...people who stay faithful to one partner, use proper contraception &amp; have enough responsibility to not inflict more screaming brats on the social support system won't get it and therefore won't die of it.</p><p>So where's the problem? Natural Selection in action, folks...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...people who stay faithful to one partner , use proper contraception &amp; have enough responsibility to not inflict more screaming brats on the social support system wo n't get it and therefore wo n't die of it.So where 's the problem ?
Natural Selection in action , folks.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...people who stay faithful to one partner, use proper contraception &amp; have enough responsibility to not inflict more screaming brats on the social support system won't get it and therefore won't die of it.So where's the problem?
Natural Selection in action, folks...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682662</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1269968580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>On the one hand, if you're playing around without wearing a condom, then you're a Darwin Award.</p></div><p>You heard it here first on slashdot, folks: a claim that unprotected sex will lead to natural selection AGAINST you for that behavior.</p><p>I have to agree that if we all don't use condoms, that will definitely cause the extinction of the human race.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>On the one hand , if you 're playing around without wearing a condom , then you 're a Darwin Award.You heard it here first on slashdot , folks : a claim that unprotected sex will lead to natural selection AGAINST you for that behavior.I have to agree that if we all do n't use condoms , that will definitely cause the extinction of the human race .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the one hand, if you're playing around without wearing a condom, then you're a Darwin Award.You heard it here first on slashdot, folks: a claim that unprotected sex will lead to natural selection AGAINST you for that behavior.I have to agree that if we all don't use condoms, that will definitely cause the extinction of the human race.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685354</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>DarkIye</author>
	<datestamp>1270037220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I reckon if this phrase doesn't set extreme-right-wing America straight, then nothing will.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I reckon if this phrase does n't set extreme-right-wing America straight , then nothing will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I reckon if this phrase doesn't set extreme-right-wing America straight, then nothing will.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682502</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269967260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry, did you say something? I was too busy having sex, which I, being a youth, do constantly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , did you say something ?
I was too busy having sex , which I , being a youth , do constantly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, did you say something?
I was too busy having sex, which I, being a youth, do constantly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685762</id>
	<title>Re:No one loves you when you have the...</title>
	<author>Dunbal</author>
	<datestamp>1270040820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Frankly, I don't think most doctors know what they are doing when it comes to dealing with this cruft. They are the reason why we are getting these "super bugs". It's a matter of "try a little of this, and if that doesn't work, try a little of that". </i></p><p>Frankly as a doctor I can say you have no idea about the subject which you are attempting to speak. It saddens me to learn that in your ignorance you choose to blame the people who actually have researched and understand infectious disease and antibiotic resistance, when you have absolutely no idea even of how your own body works. You know. The one you've been living in all your life?</p><p>Suggesting that any physician was "experimenting" with you is preposterous. Such a thing is both immoral AND illegal. We follow treatment guidelines that result from numerous published scientific studies that show that one drug is statistically superior to another. No one just picks a drug "at random" to treat you. Statistical superiority does not guarantee that the drug will work in your particular case - that's not what statistics do, however it is logically your "best chance" at a first time cure. The fact that your disease was resistant to the new drug only goes to show the severity of this problem.</p><p>Also understand that there is nothing "magical" about penicillin. Different categories of antibiotics work in different ways. Penicillin affects the ability for bacteria to grow their cell walls. Other drugs (cipro for example) inhibit bacteria's ability to copy their DNA. Still others (macrolides like Azithromycin) inhibit protein synthesis at the ribosome level. Some of these drugs never work on some type of bacteria. All of these drugs can be rendered useless by some bacteria - and what's worse, these resistance genes can be passed across species of bacteria through plasmids.</p><p>As to your philosophy regarding infections - perhaps keeping your penis in your pants and avoiding them would be wiser. Getting one STI is bad enough. Getting THREE means you were either paying for unprotected sex with prostitutes or are simply sleeping with everything in sight. I hope you have been checked recently for HIV, syphilis, hepatitis B and C and HPV, because most sexually transmitted infections come in groups - the person(s) who gave you gonorrhea probably gave you quite a few other things too. It also pains me to think how many other people you might have harmed or might harm in the future in your ignorance.</p><p>Please educate yourself. And please masturbate from now on, you'll be doing the world a favor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Frankly , I do n't think most doctors know what they are doing when it comes to dealing with this cruft .
They are the reason why we are getting these " super bugs " .
It 's a matter of " try a little of this , and if that does n't work , try a little of that " .
Frankly as a doctor I can say you have no idea about the subject which you are attempting to speak .
It saddens me to learn that in your ignorance you choose to blame the people who actually have researched and understand infectious disease and antibiotic resistance , when you have absolutely no idea even of how your own body works .
You know .
The one you 've been living in all your life ? Suggesting that any physician was " experimenting " with you is preposterous .
Such a thing is both immoral AND illegal .
We follow treatment guidelines that result from numerous published scientific studies that show that one drug is statistically superior to another .
No one just picks a drug " at random " to treat you .
Statistical superiority does not guarantee that the drug will work in your particular case - that 's not what statistics do , however it is logically your " best chance " at a first time cure .
The fact that your disease was resistant to the new drug only goes to show the severity of this problem.Also understand that there is nothing " magical " about penicillin .
Different categories of antibiotics work in different ways .
Penicillin affects the ability for bacteria to grow their cell walls .
Other drugs ( cipro for example ) inhibit bacteria 's ability to copy their DNA .
Still others ( macrolides like Azithromycin ) inhibit protein synthesis at the ribosome level .
Some of these drugs never work on some type of bacteria .
All of these drugs can be rendered useless by some bacteria - and what 's worse , these resistance genes can be passed across species of bacteria through plasmids.As to your philosophy regarding infections - perhaps keeping your penis in your pants and avoiding them would be wiser .
Getting one STI is bad enough .
Getting THREE means you were either paying for unprotected sex with prostitutes or are simply sleeping with everything in sight .
I hope you have been checked recently for HIV , syphilis , hepatitis B and C and HPV , because most sexually transmitted infections come in groups - the person ( s ) who gave you gonorrhea probably gave you quite a few other things too .
It also pains me to think how many other people you might have harmed or might harm in the future in your ignorance.Please educate yourself .
And please masturbate from now on , you 'll be doing the world a favor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frankly, I don't think most doctors know what they are doing when it comes to dealing with this cruft.
They are the reason why we are getting these "super bugs".
It's a matter of "try a little of this, and if that doesn't work, try a little of that".
Frankly as a doctor I can say you have no idea about the subject which you are attempting to speak.
It saddens me to learn that in your ignorance you choose to blame the people who actually have researched and understand infectious disease and antibiotic resistance, when you have absolutely no idea even of how your own body works.
You know.
The one you've been living in all your life?Suggesting that any physician was "experimenting" with you is preposterous.
Such a thing is both immoral AND illegal.
We follow treatment guidelines that result from numerous published scientific studies that show that one drug is statistically superior to another.
No one just picks a drug "at random" to treat you.
Statistical superiority does not guarantee that the drug will work in your particular case - that's not what statistics do, however it is logically your "best chance" at a first time cure.
The fact that your disease was resistant to the new drug only goes to show the severity of this problem.Also understand that there is nothing "magical" about penicillin.
Different categories of antibiotics work in different ways.
Penicillin affects the ability for bacteria to grow their cell walls.
Other drugs (cipro for example) inhibit bacteria's ability to copy their DNA.
Still others (macrolides like Azithromycin) inhibit protein synthesis at the ribosome level.
Some of these drugs never work on some type of bacteria.
All of these drugs can be rendered useless by some bacteria - and what's worse, these resistance genes can be passed across species of bacteria through plasmids.As to your philosophy regarding infections - perhaps keeping your penis in your pants and avoiding them would be wiser.
Getting one STI is bad enough.
Getting THREE means you were either paying for unprotected sex with prostitutes or are simply sleeping with everything in sight.
I hope you have been checked recently for HIV, syphilis, hepatitis B and C and HPV, because most sexually transmitted infections come in groups - the person(s) who gave you gonorrhea probably gave you quite a few other things too.
It also pains me to think how many other people you might have harmed or might harm in the future in your ignorance.Please educate yourself.
And please masturbate from now on, you'll be doing the world a favor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682750</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683820</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269978900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Catholic church is against contraception because they know people will have sex anyway.  It's a political/economic strategy: get your followers to reproduce more and you will have more followers, and hence more money, power, and young boys.  The church <i>tells</i> people to practice abstinence, with a couple thousand years of experience telling them nobody actually <i>will</i>.  You do the math.</p><p>Oh, and by the way, all the other big religions are doing the same thing.  It's how they got big.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Catholic church is against contraception because they know people will have sex anyway .
It 's a political/economic strategy : get your followers to reproduce more and you will have more followers , and hence more money , power , and young boys .
The church tells people to practice abstinence , with a couple thousand years of experience telling them nobody actually will .
You do the math.Oh , and by the way , all the other big religions are doing the same thing .
It 's how they got big .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Catholic church is against contraception because they know people will have sex anyway.
It's a political/economic strategy: get your followers to reproduce more and you will have more followers, and hence more money, power, and young boys.
The church tells people to practice abstinence, with a couple thousand years of experience telling them nobody actually will.
You do the math.Oh, and by the way, all the other big religions are doing the same thing.
It's how they got big.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682906</id>
	<title>69 Comments</title>
	<author>pongo000</author>
	<datestamp>1269970800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What I saw in this article summary when I refreshed the front page:</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * 69 comments</p><p>I thought this might be a joke...then I remembered I was on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I saw in this article summary when I refreshed the front page :         * 69 commentsI thought this might be a joke...then I remembered I was on / .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I saw in this article summary when I refreshed the front page:
        * 69 commentsI thought this might be a joke...then I remembered I was on /.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684008</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>jacquems</author>
	<datestamp>1270067400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My high school's sex education classes (in the mid-1990s) presented the potential risks and the level of risk associated with various forms of sexual activity, as well as the various options for mitigating the risks and the effectiveness of each option. It was emphasized that abstinence (including abstinence from oral and anal sex) was the only 100\% effective method for preventing pregnancy and STDs. I determined what my acceptable level of risk was, and acted accordingly, but then again I can't claim to have been a typical teenager.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My high school 's sex education classes ( in the mid-1990s ) presented the potential risks and the level of risk associated with various forms of sexual activity , as well as the various options for mitigating the risks and the effectiveness of each option .
It was emphasized that abstinence ( including abstinence from oral and anal sex ) was the only 100 \ % effective method for preventing pregnancy and STDs .
I determined what my acceptable level of risk was , and acted accordingly , but then again I ca n't claim to have been a typical teenager .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My high school's sex education classes (in the mid-1990s) presented the potential risks and the level of risk associated with various forms of sexual activity, as well as the various options for mitigating the risks and the effectiveness of each option.
It was emphasized that abstinence (including abstinence from oral and anal sex) was the only 100\% effective method for preventing pregnancy and STDs.
I determined what my acceptable level of risk was, and acted accordingly, but then again I can't claim to have been a typical teenager.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682750</id>
	<title>No one loves you when you have the...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269969240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I was a sexually active youth (back in the 60's and 70's) I managed to get the clap at least 3 times. The first time, I was in Mexico. I went to the pharmacy and got a lot of oral penicillin. Dosed myself with a couple of million units a day for a week or two. Bingo - cured. The next time, I was in the US and went to my family doctor. He prescribed some new "stronger" antibiotic for it. Guess what - it didn't work! I went back to the massive "beat it to death" penicillin doses and cured it post haste. The last time I got it, I went to the P-cure again. Two weeks, gone.
<br> <br>
Frankly, I don't think most doctors know what they are doing when it comes to dealing with this cruft. They are the reason why we are getting these "super bugs". It's a matter of "try a little of this, and if that doesn't work, try a little of that". As a result, both "this" and "that" make the little buggers stronger. My philosophy when it comes to infections - hit them hard and don't let up until they are dead, dead, dead!</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was a sexually active youth ( back in the 60 's and 70 's ) I managed to get the clap at least 3 times .
The first time , I was in Mexico .
I went to the pharmacy and got a lot of oral penicillin .
Dosed myself with a couple of million units a day for a week or two .
Bingo - cured .
The next time , I was in the US and went to my family doctor .
He prescribed some new " stronger " antibiotic for it .
Guess what - it did n't work !
I went back to the massive " beat it to death " penicillin doses and cured it post haste .
The last time I got it , I went to the P-cure again .
Two weeks , gone .
Frankly , I do n't think most doctors know what they are doing when it comes to dealing with this cruft .
They are the reason why we are getting these " super bugs " .
It 's a matter of " try a little of this , and if that does n't work , try a little of that " .
As a result , both " this " and " that " make the little buggers stronger .
My philosophy when it comes to infections - hit them hard and do n't let up until they are dead , dead , dead !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was a sexually active youth (back in the 60's and 70's) I managed to get the clap at least 3 times.
The first time, I was in Mexico.
I went to the pharmacy and got a lot of oral penicillin.
Dosed myself with a couple of million units a day for a week or two.
Bingo - cured.
The next time, I was in the US and went to my family doctor.
He prescribed some new "stronger" antibiotic for it.
Guess what - it didn't work!
I went back to the massive "beat it to death" penicillin doses and cured it post haste.
The last time I got it, I went to the P-cure again.
Two weeks, gone.
Frankly, I don't think most doctors know what they are doing when it comes to dealing with this cruft.
They are the reason why we are getting these "super bugs".
It's a matter of "try a little of this, and if that doesn't work, try a little of that".
As a result, both "this" and "that" make the little buggers stronger.
My philosophy when it comes to infections - hit them hard and don't let up until they are dead, dead, dead!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683446</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269975420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>90\% of the kids firmly believed that abstinence was the best preventive measure</p></div><p>If the kids think it, that's great (provided they're not also doing the other thing you mentioned).  The problem is when the parents think the kids think it.  They say 'Little Billy would never do that' while Littler Billy is already on his way.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>90 \ % of the kids firmly believed that abstinence was the best preventive measureIf the kids think it , that 's great ( provided they 're not also doing the other thing you mentioned ) .
The problem is when the parents think the kids think it .
They say 'Little Billy would never do that ' while Littler Billy is already on his way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>90\% of the kids firmly believed that abstinence was the best preventive measureIf the kids think it, that's great (provided they're not also doing the other thing you mentioned).
The problem is when the parents think the kids think it.
They say 'Little Billy would never do that' while Littler Billy is already on his way.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682228</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269965700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Gonorrhea? I thought we had that one licked.</i></p><p>Gross.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gonorrhea ?
I thought we had that one licked.Gross .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gonorrhea?
I thought we had that one licked.Gross.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682810</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an idea</title>
	<author>dmr001</author>
	<datestamp>1269969780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh hi. You don't have gonorrhea (again)? No? And we're using birth control pills? And we're married/together/have 3 children together/in high school so we don't think more than 3 hours into the future/are self-deluding evangelical Christians/don't really give a crap? And you would never sleep around on me? So it must be safe to have sex, then, right?
<p>
Gonorrhea (and it's fellow-traveler) chlamydia deserve some credit here - they're good at what they do, and have been for thousands of years, and will probably continue to do so until we find something more new-fangled than current antibiotic therapy.
</p><p>
Convincing people not to have risky sex is about equally challenging.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh hi .
You do n't have gonorrhea ( again ) ?
No ? And we 're using birth control pills ?
And we 're married/together/have 3 children together/in high school so we do n't think more than 3 hours into the future/are self-deluding evangelical Christians/do n't really give a crap ?
And you would never sleep around on me ?
So it must be safe to have sex , then , right ?
Gonorrhea ( and it 's fellow-traveler ) chlamydia deserve some credit here - they 're good at what they do , and have been for thousands of years , and will probably continue to do so until we find something more new-fangled than current antibiotic therapy .
Convincing people not to have risky sex is about equally challenging .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh hi.
You don't have gonorrhea (again)?
No? And we're using birth control pills?
And we're married/together/have 3 children together/in high school so we don't think more than 3 hours into the future/are self-deluding evangelical Christians/don't really give a crap?
And you would never sleep around on me?
So it must be safe to have sex, then, right?
Gonorrhea (and it's fellow-traveler) chlamydia deserve some credit here - they're good at what they do, and have been for thousands of years, and will probably continue to do so until we find something more new-fangled than current antibiotic therapy.
Convincing people not to have risky sex is about equally challenging.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682276</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31689970</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Toze</author>
	<datestamp>1270059960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>99.999\% effective,* though!</p><p>

*Some exceptions for girls named Mary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>99.999 \ % effective , * though !
* Some exceptions for girls named Mary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>99.999\% effective,* though!
*Some exceptions for girls named Mary.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682202</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269965520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I smell sarcasm; in my school 90\% of the kids firmly believed that abstinence was the best preventive measure, but decided that meant having boatloads of oral sex without condoms. 8\% thought that they didn't need condoms, and the remaining 2\% were split up by reasonable people and virginal nerds...

<p>Maybe we can get some well needed crowd thinning.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I smell sarcasm ; in my school 90 \ % of the kids firmly believed that abstinence was the best preventive measure , but decided that meant having boatloads of oral sex without condoms .
8 \ % thought that they did n't need condoms , and the remaining 2 \ % were split up by reasonable people and virginal nerds.. . Maybe we can get some well needed crowd thinning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I smell sarcasm; in my school 90\% of the kids firmly believed that abstinence was the best preventive measure, but decided that meant having boatloads of oral sex without condoms.
8\% thought that they didn't need condoms, and the remaining 2\% were split up by reasonable people and virginal nerds...

Maybe we can get some well needed crowd thinning.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31686788</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>Attila Dimedici</author>
	<datestamp>1270046700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Except that in actual scientific tests it has been <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Education/2010/0202/Abstinence-only-study-could-alter-sex-education-landscape" title="csmonitor.com">http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Education/2010/0202/Abstinence-only-study-could-alter-sex-education-landscape</a> [csmonitor.com]
<br>
See another of my posts for more details.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except that in actual scientific tests it has been http : //www.csmonitor.com/USA/Education/2010/0202/Abstinence-only-study-could-alter-sex-education-landscape [ csmonitor.com ] See another of my posts for more details .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except that in actual scientific tests it has been http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Education/2010/0202/Abstinence-only-study-could-alter-sex-education-landscape [csmonitor.com]

See another of my posts for more details.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683264</id>
	<title>Re:An STD the next super-bug?</title>
	<author>d1r3lnd</author>
	<datestamp>1269973680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't see how that follows; if anything, the Greeks shall inherit the earth. Frat boys will be the first to develop an immunity, and let's face it - if you're contracting STDs, you're both having sex and avoiding birth control.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see how that follows ; if anything , the Greeks shall inherit the earth .
Frat boys will be the first to develop an immunity , and let 's face it - if you 're contracting STDs , you 're both having sex and avoiding birth control .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see how that follows; if anything, the Greeks shall inherit the earth.
Frat boys will be the first to develop an immunity, and let's face it - if you're contracting STDs, you're both having sex and avoiding birth control.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682534</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269967440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure, and hormone-soaked teenagers whose brains are still trying to develop good impulse control always think rationally and choose abstinence when a member of their preferred sex is hot to trot for them.  This is why abstinence-only education has been such a rousing success everywhere it's been tried.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , and hormone-soaked teenagers whose brains are still trying to develop good impulse control always think rationally and choose abstinence when a member of their preferred sex is hot to trot for them .
This is why abstinence-only education has been such a rousing success everywhere it 's been tried .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, and hormone-soaked teenagers whose brains are still trying to develop good impulse control always think rationally and choose abstinence when a member of their preferred sex is hot to trot for them.
This is why abstinence-only education has been such a rousing success everywhere it's been tried.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682636</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269968220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A lot of people don't realize they have been sleeping with someone who has been sleeping with someone else.</p><p>I can't even count the number of people I know that are cheating, or have been cheated on. And all these people will think they are all faithful and will not use a condom, but one of them will get something and pass it along to everyone else.</p><p>My wife cheated on me once, but I was far more upset that she came back to me and didn't use a condom after god-knows-what the bitch did or didn't use with the other guy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of people do n't realize they have been sleeping with someone who has been sleeping with someone else.I ca n't even count the number of people I know that are cheating , or have been cheated on .
And all these people will think they are all faithful and will not use a condom , but one of them will get something and pass it along to everyone else.My wife cheated on me once , but I was far more upset that she came back to me and did n't use a condom after god-knows-what the bitch did or did n't use with the other guy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of people don't realize they have been sleeping with someone who has been sleeping with someone else.I can't even count the number of people I know that are cheating, or have been cheated on.
And all these people will think they are all faithful and will not use a condom, but one of them will get something and pass it along to everyone else.My wife cheated on me once, but I was far more upset that she came back to me and didn't use a condom after god-knows-what the bitch did or didn't use with the other guy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682276</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683208</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269973380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are Catholics forbidden from marrying non-Catholics ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are Catholics forbidden from marrying non-Catholics ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are Catholics forbidden from marrying non-Catholics ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683308</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an idea</title>
	<author>jamesh</author>
	<datestamp>1269974100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Condoms take away a large amount of the pleasure of sex.</p></div><p>So does a good case of &lt;insert STD here&gt;, which can also remove a bunch of other pleasures in life, temporarily or permanently (gonorrhea is associated with infertility, and a bunch of other STD's hurt from what i've heard)</p><p>Seriously, if you are going to have unprotected sex with someone you don't know, just remember that you are going to have sex with someone who isn't adverse to having unprotected sex with someone they don't know. Proceed cautiously.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Condoms take away a large amount of the pleasure of sex.So does a good case of , which can also remove a bunch of other pleasures in life , temporarily or permanently ( gonorrhea is associated with infertility , and a bunch of other STD 's hurt from what i 've heard ) Seriously , if you are going to have unprotected sex with someone you do n't know , just remember that you are going to have sex with someone who is n't adverse to having unprotected sex with someone they do n't know .
Proceed cautiously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Condoms take away a large amount of the pleasure of sex.So does a good case of , which can also remove a bunch of other pleasures in life, temporarily or permanently (gonorrhea is associated with infertility, and a bunch of other STD's hurt from what i've heard)Seriously, if you are going to have unprotected sex with someone you don't know, just remember that you are going to have sex with someone who isn't adverse to having unprotected sex with someone they don't know.
Proceed cautiously.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682558</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269967560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Condoms take away a large amount of the pleasure of sex.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Condoms take away a large amount of the pleasure of sex .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Condoms take away a large amount of the pleasure of sex.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682276</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683116</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269972660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I wish people would stop peddling this ignorant crap.  The Catholic church is against condoms, yes, but it's also against extramarital sex.  If you're <i>really</i> an observant Catholic the lack of condoms isn't going to increase your risk of contracting STDs.</p><p>Catholics having extramarital sex aren't acting within the tenants of their faith, and if they don't wear condoms it's because nobody likes to wear condoms, not because of any church teaching.</p></div><p>But if you get remarried, your gained STD's can't get annulled...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish people would stop peddling this ignorant crap .
The Catholic church is against condoms , yes , but it 's also against extramarital sex .
If you 're really an observant Catholic the lack of condoms is n't going to increase your risk of contracting STDs.Catholics having extramarital sex are n't acting within the tenants of their faith , and if they do n't wear condoms it 's because nobody likes to wear condoms , not because of any church teaching.But if you get remarried , your gained STD 's ca n't get annulled.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish people would stop peddling this ignorant crap.
The Catholic church is against condoms, yes, but it's also against extramarital sex.
If you're really an observant Catholic the lack of condoms isn't going to increase your risk of contracting STDs.Catholics having extramarital sex aren't acting within the tenants of their faith, and if they don't wear condoms it's because nobody likes to wear condoms, not because of any church teaching.But if you get remarried, your gained STD's can't get annulled...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682830</id>
	<title>I for one welcome our sexual overlords</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269970020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>at least those our future kings gots their priority sorted</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>at least those our future kings gots their priority sorted</tokentext>
<sentencetext>at least those our future kings gots their priority sorted</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682992</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Nemyst</author>
	<datestamp>1269971460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Abstinence is like communism: in a perfect world, it'd work.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Abstinence is like communism : in a perfect world , it 'd work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Abstinence is like communism: in a perfect world, it'd work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31686184</id>
	<title>easy cure: get a mac</title>
	<author>knappe duivel</author>
	<datestamp>1270043640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The cure is easy: get a Mac. Girls will want to sleep with you and no virus can touch you. (It works for me)</htmltext>
<tokenext>The cure is easy : get a Mac .
Girls will want to sleep with you and no virus can touch you .
( It works for me )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The cure is easy: get a Mac.
Girls will want to sleep with you and no virus can touch you.
(It works for me)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683646</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>Nutria</author>
	<datestamp>1269977520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Sure, and hormone-soaked teenagers<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... always think rationally</i></p><p>So, we let them run wild, and not even <b>try</b> to impart some self-discipline?</p><p>No wonder this country is in it's current shit pile state of affairs, sinking even deeper.</p><p><i>This is why abstinence-only education has been such a rousing success everywhere it's been tried.</i></p><p>Re-read my post.  Nowhere did I say "Only teach abstinence."  It's why there are speed limits <b>and</b> safety belts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , and hormone-soaked teenagers ... always think rationallySo , we let them run wild , and not even try to impart some self-discipline ? No wonder this country is in it 's current shit pile state of affairs , sinking even deeper.This is why abstinence-only education has been such a rousing success everywhere it 's been tried.Re-read my post .
Nowhere did I say " Only teach abstinence .
" It 's why there are speed limits and safety belts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, and hormone-soaked teenagers ... always think rationallySo, we let them run wild, and not even try to impart some self-discipline?No wonder this country is in it's current shit pile state of affairs, sinking even deeper.This is why abstinence-only education has been such a rousing success everywhere it's been tried.Re-read my post.
Nowhere did I say "Only teach abstinence.
"  It's why there are speed limits and safety belts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682792</id>
	<title>Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269969720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's pleasurable to have sex with your partner, it's hedonistic to have sex with everyone else. But then again, it's the nature of half of us, as shown by <a href="http://www.soc.duke.edu/~jmoody77/chains\_pressfigure1.jpg" title="duke.edu" rel="nofollow">this</a> [duke.edu] chart</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's pleasurable to have sex with your partner , it 's hedonistic to have sex with everyone else .
But then again , it 's the nature of half of us , as shown by this [ duke.edu ] chart</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's pleasurable to have sex with your partner, it's hedonistic to have sex with everyone else.
But then again, it's the nature of half of us, as shown by this [duke.edu] chart</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685056</id>
	<title>Don't care</title>
	<author>celibate for life</author>
	<datestamp>1270034040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll never get it. My username explains.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll never get it .
My username explains .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll never get it.
My username explains.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684680</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270030320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>... or they could just go into the wooden box with the screen, and say a couple of hailmaries, and all would be right - right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>... or they could just go into the wooden box with the screen , and say a couple of hailmaries , and all would be right - right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... or they could just go into the wooden box with the screen, and say a couple of hailmaries, and all would be right - right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31690236
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31690452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682864
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31689636
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685776
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685354
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31686116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685346
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683914
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31689242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31686788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682446
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31690320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31689970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31686030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684446
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31693408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682204
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31690628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31686046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682636
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31690926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31694220
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683330
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31696340
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31686824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683294
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683446
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31688730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31688898
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31690926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31696080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_31_0118202_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683222
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_0118202.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682426
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31689242
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683264
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31690452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683986
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_0118202.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682782
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31690926
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31694220
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31696080
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682462
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683968
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682744
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682768
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682534
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682680
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31686788
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684008
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684314
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683194
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682882
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_0118202.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682138
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31686046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682202
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682638
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31688730
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682968
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685442
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682992
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31689970
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685756
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685354
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685776
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31690628
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684084
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685372
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31690236
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31686116
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682858
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683914
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682170
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684280
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682204
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683330
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_0118202.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683292
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_0118202.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682126
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_0118202.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683928
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682716
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_0118202.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682784
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683116
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683208
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683464
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685730
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685934
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684446
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684178
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31686030
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31686824
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683294
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683650
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31689636
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683476
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31693408
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683104
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31688898
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684680
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683734
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683492
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683820
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682662
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31696340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31690320
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_0118202.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685366
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_0118202.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31684870
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_0118202.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682888
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_0118202.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682750
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685762
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_0118202.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31685918
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_0118202.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682558
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683308
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682636
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_0118202.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31682766
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_31_0118202.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_31_0118202.31683966
</commentlist>
</conversation>
