<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_30_0241257</id>
	<title>EU Demands Canada Gut Its Copyright and Patent Laws</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1269970080000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Late last year, a draft of the European Union proposal for the
intellectual property chapter of Canada, <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/4627/125/">EU Comprehensive Economic
Trade Agreement, leaked online</a>.
The leak revealed that the EU was seeking some significant changes to
Canadian IP laws. Negotiations have continued and Michael Geist
has now obtained an <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/4914/125/">updated copy
of the draft chapter</a>, complete with proposals from both the EU and
Canada. He says the breadth of the demands is stunning &mdash; the EU
is demanding nothing less than a complete overhaul of Canadian IP laws
including copyright, trademark, databases, patent, geographic
indications, and even plant variety rights."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Late last year , a draft of the European Union proposal for the intellectual property chapter of Canada , EU Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement , leaked online .
The leak revealed that the EU was seeking some significant changes to Canadian IP laws .
Negotiations have continued and Michael Geist has now obtained an updated copy of the draft chapter , complete with proposals from both the EU and Canada .
He says the breadth of the demands is stunning    the EU is demanding nothing less than a complete overhaul of Canadian IP laws including copyright , trademark , databases , patent , geographic indications , and even plant variety rights .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Late last year, a draft of the European Union proposal for the
intellectual property chapter of Canada, EU Comprehensive Economic
Trade Agreement, leaked online.
The leak revealed that the EU was seeking some significant changes to
Canadian IP laws.
Negotiations have continued and Michael Geist
has now obtained an updated copy
of the draft chapter, complete with proposals from both the EU and
Canada.
He says the breadth of the demands is stunning — the EU
is demanding nothing less than a complete overhaul of Canadian IP laws
including copyright, trademark, databases, patent, geographic
indications, and even plant variety rights.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666850</id>
	<title>WTH</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269887820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since when did the EU run Canada?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since when did the EU run Canada ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since when did the EU run Canada?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668348</id>
	<title>There is a solution for that.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269950040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just let America annex you. Come on, you know you want to join. Obama can be your President too! Being in union with America, you'll be part of a country which pushes others around, rather than being bullied themselves. Let alone, you'll get us up to 59 stars. Yeah, you can keep Quebec though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just let America annex you .
Come on , you know you want to join .
Obama can be your President too !
Being in union with America , you 'll be part of a country which pushes others around , rather than being bullied themselves .
Let alone , you 'll get us up to 59 stars .
Yeah , you can keep Quebec though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just let America annex you.
Come on, you know you want to join.
Obama can be your President too!
Being in union with America, you'll be part of a country which pushes others around, rather than being bullied themselves.
Let alone, you'll get us up to 59 stars.
Yeah, you can keep Quebec though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666990</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1269889020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously, as a Canadian this disgusts me. The EU, the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING?</p></div><p>Peace naturally leads to people working together. If  we don't want our governments to cooperate we must invent reasons for our governments to hate each other.</p><p>Its that simple. See google vs China.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , as a Canadian this disgusts me .
The EU , the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING ? Peace naturally leads to people working together .
If we do n't want our governments to cooperate we must invent reasons for our governments to hate each other.Its that simple .
See google vs China .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, as a Canadian this disgusts me.
The EU, the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING?Peace naturally leads to people working together.
If  we don't want our governments to cooperate we must invent reasons for our governments to hate each other.Its that simple.
See google vs China.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667036</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269889560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Come on!  They have every right to demand it.  It's just that you have every right to say "no." and laugh at them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on !
They have every right to demand it .
It 's just that you have every right to say " no .
" and laugh at them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on!
They have every right to demand it.
It's just that you have every right to say "no.
" and laugh at them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667634</id>
	<title>Re:Our new overlords</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269940320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And our new overlords welcome EU!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... wait, I think I'm mixing too many memes now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And our new overlords welcome EU !
... wait , I think I 'm mixing too many memes now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And our new overlords welcome EU!
... wait, I think I'm mixing too many memes now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667186</id>
	<title>Re:WTH</title>
	<author>slayer\_ix</author>
	<datestamp>1269891720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I sure didn't vote for them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I sure did n't vote for them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I sure didn't vote for them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667670</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>pydev</author>
	<datestamp>1269940800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Seriously, as a Canadian this disgusts me. The EU, the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING?</i></p><p>Canada wants to continue to trade with "these assholes" and Canadians want to travel to these "asshole" countries, no?   But trade, travel, etc. only exist because these "asshole countries" sign agreements with Canada creating the legal basis for these activities.  If Canada stops signing some agreements, then these "asshole countries" may stop signing other agreements that are more important to Canadians.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , as a Canadian this disgusts me .
The EU , the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING ? Canada wants to continue to trade with " these assholes " and Canadians want to travel to these " asshole " countries , no ?
But trade , travel , etc .
only exist because these " asshole countries " sign agreements with Canada creating the legal basis for these activities .
If Canada stops signing some agreements , then these " asshole countries " may stop signing other agreements that are more important to Canadians .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, as a Canadian this disgusts me.
The EU, the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING?Canada wants to continue to trade with "these assholes" and Canadians want to travel to these "asshole" countries, no?
But trade, travel, etc.
only exist because these "asshole countries" sign agreements with Canada creating the legal basis for these activities.
If Canada stops signing some agreements, then these "asshole countries" may stop signing other agreements that are more important to Canadians.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668570</id>
	<title>Dear World</title>
	<author>whisper\_jeff</author>
	<datestamp>1269952800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dear World,<br> <br>
As one of the few countries in the world whose economy is not absolutely sitting in the toilet, we, the People of Canada, would like to politely ask you all to fuck off, eh. We appreciate your opinions on our intellectual property laws but, given that we're not bordering on bankruptcy and/or forcing our people to live in a Nanny-state like the rest of you seem to be, we are forced to assume we must be doing something right while the rest of you aren't exactly laying down templates of "how it should be done."<br> <br>
We do apologize for the broad generalizations that may be made in this message but, really, the point remains - fuck off, eh. Mind your own damn business and we'll mind our own. We've done pretty well at minding our business and are just fine with things as they are. Thanks.<br> <br>
Sincerely and respectfully, Canada.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear World , As one of the few countries in the world whose economy is not absolutely sitting in the toilet , we , the People of Canada , would like to politely ask you all to fuck off , eh .
We appreciate your opinions on our intellectual property laws but , given that we 're not bordering on bankruptcy and/or forcing our people to live in a Nanny-state like the rest of you seem to be , we are forced to assume we must be doing something right while the rest of you are n't exactly laying down templates of " how it should be done .
" We do apologize for the broad generalizations that may be made in this message but , really , the point remains - fuck off , eh .
Mind your own damn business and we 'll mind our own .
We 've done pretty well at minding our business and are just fine with things as they are .
Thanks . Sincerely and respectfully , Canada .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear World, 
As one of the few countries in the world whose economy is not absolutely sitting in the toilet, we, the People of Canada, would like to politely ask you all to fuck off, eh.
We appreciate your opinions on our intellectual property laws but, given that we're not bordering on bankruptcy and/or forcing our people to live in a Nanny-state like the rest of you seem to be, we are forced to assume we must be doing something right while the rest of you aren't exactly laying down templates of "how it should be done.
" 
We do apologize for the broad generalizations that may be made in this message but, really, the point remains - fuck off, eh.
Mind your own damn business and we'll mind our own.
We've done pretty well at minding our business and are just fine with things as they are.
Thanks. 
Sincerely and respectfully, Canada.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31671964</id>
	<title>Re:I can't remember...</title>
	<author>FrozenFrog</author>
	<datestamp>1269967680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
"Take off eh!  Ya hoser!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Take off eh !
Ya hoser !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
"Take off eh!
Ya hoser!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667064</id>
	<title>Commission vs Parliament</title>
	<author>Per Abrahamsen</author>
	<datestamp>1269889980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The EU Commission is a non-elected body which has as it sole mandate[1] to restrict the rights of citizens, and extend the rights of EU based corporations.  It is the Commission that negotiate these treaties, and in general propose new legislation.</p><p>The EU Parliament is an elected body which cannot propose new legislation, but can, and sometimes do, block the proposals from the commission.  The good stuff you hear from the EU is usually from the Parliament, but they contribute their share of crap as well, as parliaments do everywhere.</p><p>[1] Judging by its actions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The EU Commission is a non-elected body which has as it sole mandate [ 1 ] to restrict the rights of citizens , and extend the rights of EU based corporations .
It is the Commission that negotiate these treaties , and in general propose new legislation.The EU Parliament is an elected body which can not propose new legislation , but can , and sometimes do , block the proposals from the commission .
The good stuff you hear from the EU is usually from the Parliament , but they contribute their share of crap as well , as parliaments do everywhere .
[ 1 ] Judging by its actions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The EU Commission is a non-elected body which has as it sole mandate[1] to restrict the rights of citizens, and extend the rights of EU based corporations.
It is the Commission that negotiate these treaties, and in general propose new legislation.The EU Parliament is an elected body which cannot propose new legislation, but can, and sometimes do, block the proposals from the commission.
The good stuff you hear from the EU is usually from the Parliament, but they contribute their share of crap as well, as parliaments do everywhere.
[1] Judging by its actions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666816</id>
	<title>Overestimating their power</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269887700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember the last time some upstart European thought he could tromp all over the territorial rights of other countries. That didn't end so well for him.</p><p>His name?<br>Frank Stallone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember the last time some upstart European thought he could tromp all over the territorial rights of other countries .
That did n't end so well for him.His name ? Frank Stallone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember the last time some upstart European thought he could tromp all over the territorial rights of other countries.
That didn't end so well for him.His name?Frank Stallone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667142</id>
	<title>Re:I can't remember...</title>
	<author>QRDeNameland</author>
	<datestamp>1269891180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How do you say "fuck off" in Canadian?</p></div><p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuddle\_duddle" title="wikipedia.org">Fuddle Duddle</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you say " fuck off " in Canadian ?
Fuddle Duddle [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you say "fuck off" in Canadian?
Fuddle Duddle [wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667300</id>
	<title>Re:51 st state?</title>
	<author>osu-neko</author>
	<datestamp>1269979740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Naw, it'd work better the other way around -- our states should secede and become Canadian provinces.  Ends up the same in the end (one united country), except with Ottawa instead of Washington DC, which sounds like a trade up to me...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Naw , it 'd work better the other way around -- our states should secede and become Canadian provinces .
Ends up the same in the end ( one united country ) , except with Ottawa instead of Washington DC , which sounds like a trade up to me.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Naw, it'd work better the other way around -- our states should secede and become Canadian provinces.
Ends up the same in the end (one united country), except with Ottawa instead of Washington DC, which sounds like a trade up to me...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667278</id>
	<title>South of the Border</title>
	<author>bmo</author>
	<datestamp>1269979320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As someone here in the States, I have to say that I hope the Canadians tell everyone to piss off.</p><p>Seriously, what's the EU going to do?  Invade?</p><p>Present the <i>digitus impudicus</i>.</p><p>--<br>BMO</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As someone here in the States , I have to say that I hope the Canadians tell everyone to piss off.Seriously , what 's the EU going to do ?
Invade ? Present the digitus impudicus.--BMO</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As someone here in the States, I have to say that I hope the Canadians tell everyone to piss off.Seriously, what's the EU going to do?
Invade?Present the digitus impudicus.--BMO</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31672326</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269968760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously, as a Canadian this disgusts me. The EU, the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING?</p></div><p>Being Free, and having their own independent thought processes, their own needs, and their own desires.  It's like my cat, demanding to be fed.</p><p>What, you think they should just kow-tow to your wishes or something?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , as a Canadian this disgusts me .
The EU , the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING ? Being Free , and having their own independent thought processes , their own needs , and their own desires .
It 's like my cat , demanding to be fed.What , you think they should just kow-tow to your wishes or something ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, as a Canadian this disgusts me.
The EU, the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING?Being Free, and having their own independent thought processes, their own needs, and their own desires.
It's like my cat, demanding to be fed.What, you think they should just kow-tow to your wishes or something?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666896</id>
	<title>Just when you thought there was a glimmer of hope</title>
	<author>Sparx139</author>
	<datestamp>1269888180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>And to think that the EU had taken such a great stand with the ACTA. Then this has to happen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And to think that the EU had taken such a great stand with the ACTA .
Then this has to happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And to think that the EU had taken such a great stand with the ACTA.
Then this has to happen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668434</id>
	<title>Re:I can't remember...</title>
	<author>Rocketship Underpant</author>
	<datestamp>1269951240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Vas te faire foutre"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Vas te faire foutre "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Vas te faire foutre"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669502</id>
	<title>And in other news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269959340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Canada tells the EU to go fuck themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Canada tells the EU to go fuck themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Canada tells the EU to go fuck themselves.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669456</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>spaanoft</author>
	<datestamp>1269959160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Realize, those are provincial taxes.  Blame your province.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Realize , those are provincial taxes .
Blame your province .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Realize, those are provincial taxes.
Blame your province.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666956</id>
	<title>The Berne Convention?</title>
	<author>zlel</author>
	<datestamp>1269888720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is copyright ancillary to the author, or the author ancillary to the copyright?
If human lifespan in becoming longer, shouldn't copyright extensions past an author's life be shortened instead of lengthened?
Or does it still hold that the good die young?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is copyright ancillary to the author , or the author ancillary to the copyright ?
If human lifespan in becoming longer , should n't copyright extensions past an author 's life be shortened instead of lengthened ?
Or does it still hold that the good die young ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is copyright ancillary to the author, or the author ancillary to the copyright?
If human lifespan in becoming longer, shouldn't copyright extensions past an author's life be shortened instead of lengthened?
Or does it still hold that the good die young?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666862</id>
	<title>Since when?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269887940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Canada is in Europe now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Canada is in Europe now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Canada is in Europe now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667034</id>
	<title>Re:I can't remember...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269889560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A polite but sternly worded letter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A polite but sternly worded letter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A polite but sternly worded letter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667138</id>
	<title>Re:WTH</title>
	<author>AHuxley</author>
	<datestamp>1269891120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The EU is full of love, respect and hope for parts of Canada</htmltext>
<tokenext>The EU is full of love , respect and hope for parts of Canada</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The EU is full of love, respect and hope for parts of Canada</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667282</id>
	<title>For once I agree with Rupert Murdoch ...</title>
	<author>Alain Williams</author>
	<datestamp>1269979440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>or at least the famous Sun headline on a previous EU strong arm attempt "<a href="http://www.currybet.net/cbet\_blog/2007/12/french\_the\_sun.php" title="currybet.net">Up Yours Delors</a> [currybet.net]".</htmltext>
<tokenext>or at least the famous Sun headline on a previous EU strong arm attempt " Up Yours Delors [ currybet.net ] " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or at least the famous Sun headline on a previous EU strong arm attempt "Up Yours Delors [currybet.net]".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669768</id>
	<title>Re:South of the Border</title>
	<author>werfu</author>
	<datestamp>1269960900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We're working hard toward getting rid of our dependence over the USA and China is now becoming one of our biggest trade partner. Canada is not US 51th state nor will it be the next european country. Our economy is strong, we've got plentiful of natural resources and we've got space. If we can ever get somebody wise at the head of the country, Canada could be the next big thing in the world.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're working hard toward getting rid of our dependence over the USA and China is now becoming one of our biggest trade partner .
Canada is not US 51th state nor will it be the next european country .
Our economy is strong , we 've got plentiful of natural resources and we 've got space .
If we can ever get somebody wise at the head of the country , Canada could be the next big thing in the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're working hard toward getting rid of our dependence over the USA and China is now becoming one of our biggest trade partner.
Canada is not US 51th state nor will it be the next european country.
Our economy is strong, we've got plentiful of natural resources and we've got space.
If we can ever get somebody wise at the head of the country, Canada could be the next big thing in the world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31717542</id>
	<title>Re:51 st state?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270323180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When will you be aiming for Mexico and Cuba? Open your borders, man! Think of the teq, cigs and women!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When will you be aiming for Mexico and Cuba ?
Open your borders , man !
Think of the teq , cigs and women !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When will you be aiming for Mexico and Cuba?
Open your borders, man!
Think of the teq, cigs and women!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667128</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>AHuxley</author>
	<datestamp>1269890940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Poor Canada.  The US wants your wood, fresh water, its draft dodgers, syrups and oil.<br>
The EU wants your artistic brains and Francophone culture.<br>
Make the US and the EU pay for both.  <br>
Let the US feel market forces and flood the EU with low cost French and English culture.<br>
As for the length of copy control on works, talk to some local Canadian artists,musicians, lawyers, playwrights, authors and filmmakers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Poor Canada .
The US wants your wood , fresh water , its draft dodgers , syrups and oil .
The EU wants your artistic brains and Francophone culture .
Make the US and the EU pay for both .
Let the US feel market forces and flood the EU with low cost French and English culture .
As for the length of copy control on works , talk to some local Canadian artists,musicians , lawyers , playwrights , authors and filmmakers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Poor Canada.
The US wants your wood, fresh water, its draft dodgers, syrups and oil.
The EU wants your artistic brains and Francophone culture.
Make the US and the EU pay for both.
Let the US feel market forces and flood the EU with low cost French and English culture.
As for the length of copy control on works, talk to some local Canadian artists,musicians, lawyers, playwrights, authors and filmmakers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668458</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>warGod3</author>
	<datestamp>1269951540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What gives them the right? Pretty much the right of "because we want to." Just like here in the US, we can "demand" that governments hand over criminals, as outlined in some convention or treaty. It's a matter of "you scratch my itch, I'll scratch yours."</p><p>Canada, if they (being the government) wishes to sign the treaty, then they shall. Someone on both sides will probably benefit, just not the general populace.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What gives them the right ?
Pretty much the right of " because we want to .
" Just like here in the US , we can " demand " that governments hand over criminals , as outlined in some convention or treaty .
It 's a matter of " you scratch my itch , I 'll scratch yours .
" Canada , if they ( being the government ) wishes to sign the treaty , then they shall .
Someone on both sides will probably benefit , just not the general populace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What gives them the right?
Pretty much the right of "because we want to.
" Just like here in the US, we can "demand" that governments hand over criminals, as outlined in some convention or treaty.
It's a matter of "you scratch my itch, I'll scratch yours.
"Canada, if they (being the government) wishes to sign the treaty, then they shall.
Someone on both sides will probably benefit, just not the general populace.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846</id>
	<title>I can't remember...</title>
	<author>tsotha</author>
	<datestamp>1269887820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>How do you say "fuck off" in Canadian?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you say " fuck off " in Canadian ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you say "fuck off" in Canadian?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666984</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269888960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unfortunately, they can do (try) this because they are our customers.  Canada's place in the economic world revolves around one thing - we have lots of natural resources that we can sell to other countries.

We make so much money selling our stuff (oil, trees, etc.) that we try to place nice so you'll keep making us rich.  You should know this as an Albertan<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)  It's pretty much the reason we follow step what the US is doing.

Eurpoe doesn't have nearly as much leverage as the US, but Canada is looking to diversify trading partners...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , they can do ( try ) this because they are our customers .
Canada 's place in the economic world revolves around one thing - we have lots of natural resources that we can sell to other countries .
We make so much money selling our stuff ( oil , trees , etc .
) that we try to place nice so you 'll keep making us rich .
You should know this as an Albertan ; - ) It 's pretty much the reason we follow step what the US is doing .
Eurpoe does n't have nearly as much leverage as the US , but Canada is looking to diversify trading partners.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately, they can do (try) this because they are our customers.
Canada's place in the economic world revolves around one thing - we have lots of natural resources that we can sell to other countries.
We make so much money selling our stuff (oil, trees, etc.
) that we try to place nice so you'll keep making us rich.
You should know this as an Albertan ;-)  It's pretty much the reason we follow step what the US is doing.
Eurpoe doesn't have nearly as much leverage as the US, but Canada is looking to diversify trading partners...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31674494</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>Stradivarius</author>
	<datestamp>1269975840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously, as a Canadian this disgusts me. The EU, the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING?</p></div><p>As an American, it disgusts me.  This is the problem with politicians around the world - they're never content to let others live differently than they themselves wish to.</p><p>It's especially ironic for the US, given that the nation was founded on a federalism in which states were intended to have most of the power. The Founders were well aware of the need for the states to act as social laboratories for experimentation.  You never learn if you don't try new things. Rigid homogeneity is not good for the society as a whole.  Too bad that lesson seems to have been forgotten in the present day, in which the federal government attempts to control damn near everything, domestically and abroad.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , as a Canadian this disgusts me .
The EU , the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING ? As an American , it disgusts me .
This is the problem with politicians around the world - they 're never content to let others live differently than they themselves wish to.It 's especially ironic for the US , given that the nation was founded on a federalism in which states were intended to have most of the power .
The Founders were well aware of the need for the states to act as social laboratories for experimentation .
You never learn if you do n't try new things .
Rigid homogeneity is not good for the society as a whole .
Too bad that lesson seems to have been forgotten in the present day , in which the federal government attempts to control damn near everything , domestically and abroad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, as a Canadian this disgusts me.
The EU, the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING?As an American, it disgusts me.
This is the problem with politicians around the world - they're never content to let others live differently than they themselves wish to.It's especially ironic for the US, given that the nation was founded on a federalism in which states were intended to have most of the power.
The Founders were well aware of the need for the states to act as social laboratories for experimentation.
You never learn if you don't try new things.
Rigid homogeneity is not good for the society as a whole.
Too bad that lesson seems to have been forgotten in the present day, in which the federal government attempts to control damn near everything, domestically and abroad.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667686</id>
	<title>Re:I can't remember...</title>
	<author>Krneki</author>
	<datestamp>1269941040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do you even understand what the EU wants?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you even understand what the EU wants ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you even understand what the EU wants?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31670890</id>
	<title>Re:South of the Border</title>
	<author>Kenshin</author>
	<datestamp>1269964740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now, I dislike Stephen Harper as much as anyone else, but he isn't quite Voldemort.</p><p>Or is he? Hmm...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now , I dislike Stephen Harper as much as anyone else , but he is n't quite Voldemort.Or is he ?
Hmm.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now, I dislike Stephen Harper as much as anyone else, but he isn't quite Voldemort.Or is he?
Hmm...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669022</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667214</id>
	<title>Can I work in London?</title>
	<author>fyoder</author>
	<datestamp>1269891960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've always thought it would be cool to work in Europe for awhile, but I wasn't aware that we were members of EU.  When did that happen?  Is it because we've got the queen on our money?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've always thought it would be cool to work in Europe for awhile , but I was n't aware that we were members of EU .
When did that happen ?
Is it because we 've got the queen on our money ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've always thought it would be cool to work in Europe for awhile, but I wasn't aware that we were members of EU.
When did that happen?
Is it because we've got the queen on our money?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669048</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269956760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I can't imagine why Canada is still negotiating such a treaty when it seems to be so insanely one-sided.</i></p><p>Because we must defend our national treasures Loverboy and Celine Dion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't imagine why Canada is still negotiating such a treaty when it seems to be so insanely one-sided.Because we must defend our national treasures Loverboy and Celine Dion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't imagine why Canada is still negotiating such a treaty when it seems to be so insanely one-sided.Because we must defend our national treasures Loverboy and Celine Dion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31672028</id>
	<title>Re:51 st state?</title>
	<author>Graham J - XVI</author>
	<datestamp>1269967860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That does seem to be the American way - invade the oil laden areas first then spread to the rest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That does seem to be the American way - invade the oil laden areas first then spread to the rest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That does seem to be the American way - invade the oil laden areas first then spread to the rest.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31671704</id>
	<title>Re:I can't remember...</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1269967020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought that was British, not Canadian.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought that was British , not Canadian .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought that was British, not Canadian.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667492</id>
	<title>Its just EU SOP...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269981960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The buggers in Brussels don't give a f*** about the people, they just want the power.</p><p>Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't a hidden clause to subsume Canada into the EU and replace its currency with the Euro.  After all, Quebec must feel like home to them......</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The buggers in Brussels do n't give a f * * * about the people , they just want the power.Actually , I would n't be surprised if there was n't a hidden clause to subsume Canada into the EU and replace its currency with the Euro .
After all , Quebec must feel like home to them..... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The buggers in Brussels don't give a f*** about the people, they just want the power.Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't a hidden clause to subsume Canada into the EU and replace its currency with the Euro.
After all, Quebec must feel like home to them......</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31672194</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>Graham J - XVI</author>
	<datestamp>1269968280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The difference is, even our retarded politicians would ignore the chief whereas they frequently bend over for pushy governments.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The difference is , even our retarded politicians would ignore the chief whereas they frequently bend over for pushy governments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The difference is, even our retarded politicians would ignore the chief whereas they frequently bend over for pushy governments.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668528</id>
	<title>It's called negotiation</title>
	<author>rpjs</author>
	<datestamp>1269952320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The EU sets out what it wants, Canada sets out what it wants.  In this particular section, the EU is asking for a lot more than Canada, but quite possibly in other sections Canada is asking for more than the EU (I've not read the full text of the draft).</p><p>Then the two parties sit down and start horse-trading.  Maybe there's something that Canada really wants that they'll happily swallow these copyright provisions to get.  Maybe Canada will say, no, we can't accept these provisions, but we'll concede something else instead, or maybe the EU will say insist, in which case the Canadians will say "no deal".  Most likely there'll be a lot of compromises by both sides, with both getting some of what they want, but not all.</p><p>It's interesting to consider why the Canadians are considering a free-trade agreement with Europe, considering that they're already in NAFTA.  I understand the Canadian government has been unhappy with what they see as persistent US non-compliance with their NAFTA obligations, so perhaps they're looking at a deal with the EU as a Plan B.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The EU sets out what it wants , Canada sets out what it wants .
In this particular section , the EU is asking for a lot more than Canada , but quite possibly in other sections Canada is asking for more than the EU ( I 've not read the full text of the draft ) .Then the two parties sit down and start horse-trading .
Maybe there 's something that Canada really wants that they 'll happily swallow these copyright provisions to get .
Maybe Canada will say , no , we ca n't accept these provisions , but we 'll concede something else instead , or maybe the EU will say insist , in which case the Canadians will say " no deal " .
Most likely there 'll be a lot of compromises by both sides , with both getting some of what they want , but not all.It 's interesting to consider why the Canadians are considering a free-trade agreement with Europe , considering that they 're already in NAFTA .
I understand the Canadian government has been unhappy with what they see as persistent US non-compliance with their NAFTA obligations , so perhaps they 're looking at a deal with the EU as a Plan B .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The EU sets out what it wants, Canada sets out what it wants.
In this particular section, the EU is asking for a lot more than Canada, but quite possibly in other sections Canada is asking for more than the EU (I've not read the full text of the draft).Then the two parties sit down and start horse-trading.
Maybe there's something that Canada really wants that they'll happily swallow these copyright provisions to get.
Maybe Canada will say, no, we can't accept these provisions, but we'll concede something else instead, or maybe the EU will say insist, in which case the Canadians will say "no deal".
Most likely there'll be a lot of compromises by both sides, with both getting some of what they want, but not all.It's interesting to consider why the Canadians are considering a free-trade agreement with Europe, considering that they're already in NAFTA.
I understand the Canadian government has been unhappy with what they see as persistent US non-compliance with their NAFTA obligations, so perhaps they're looking at a deal with the EU as a Plan B.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667432</id>
	<title>Re:The Berne Convention?</title>
	<author>BlackHawk-666</author>
	<datestamp>1269981300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do the world a favour, kill an author today. Help lower the length of time his/her works are under copyright. Also...someone kill George Lucus...please.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do the world a favour , kill an author today .
Help lower the length of time his/her works are under copyright .
Also...someone kill George Lucus...please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do the world a favour, kill an author today.
Help lower the length of time his/her works are under copyright.
Also...someone kill George Lucus...please.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666826</id>
	<title>FIRST!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269887700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Blame Canada?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Blame Canada ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Blame Canada?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666892</id>
	<title>No problem!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269888120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ottawa can always threaten the Europeans with the American army.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ottawa can always threaten the Europeans with the American army .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ottawa can always threaten the Europeans with the American army.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667378</id>
	<title>We need more robocop films!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269980640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There was always a heavy corporations-run-the-world theme in them</p><p>Maybe if they get the original director who did Robocop and make it so OCP now owns a major record label and use Robocop to intimidate copyright infringers</p><p>New Prime Directives:</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1. "Serve the public trust"<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 2. "Protect the innocent"<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 3. "Uphold the law"<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 4. "Protect OCP's intellectual Property"<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 5. (Classified)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There was always a heavy corporations-run-the-world theme in themMaybe if they get the original director who did Robocop and make it so OCP now owns a major record label and use Robocop to intimidate copyright infringersNew Prime Directives :       1 .
" Serve the public trust "       2 .
" Protect the innocent "       3 .
" Uphold the law "       4 .
" Protect OCP 's intellectual Property "       5 .
( Classified )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was always a heavy corporations-run-the-world theme in themMaybe if they get the original director who did Robocop and make it so OCP now owns a major record label and use Robocop to intimidate copyright infringersNew Prime Directives:
      1.
"Serve the public trust"
      2.
"Protect the innocent"
      3.
"Uphold the law"
      4.
"Protect OCP's intellectual Property"
      5.
(Classified)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669190</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>darthnoodles</author>
	<datestamp>1269957600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They can have our Francophone culture...We'll give it to them for free.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They can have our Francophone culture...We 'll give it to them for free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They can have our Francophone culture...We'll give it to them for free.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667128</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667004</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269889200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Germany here.<br>Despite the fact that we didn&rsquo;t ever elect them, they are called &ldquo;our&rdquo; government.<br>Actually, they are more like your enemies.<br>So if you ever need to throw over the EU pseudo-government, you got allies here.<br>Just beware, that the reason this is like it is in the first place, is that most people here are cattle too, and we&rsquo;re not the ones herding them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Germany here.Despite the fact that we didn    t ever elect them , they are called    our    government.Actually , they are more like your enemies.So if you ever need to throw over the EU pseudo-government , you got allies here.Just beware , that the reason this is like it is in the first place , is that most people here are cattle too , and we    re not the ones herding them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Germany here.Despite the fact that we didn’t ever elect them, they are called “our” government.Actually, they are more like your enemies.So if you ever need to throw over the EU pseudo-government, you got allies here.Just beware, that the reason this is like it is in the first place, is that most people here are cattle too, and we’re not the ones herding them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669854</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>CecilPL</author>
	<datestamp>1269961260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, the fact is that taxes are too high on beer but too low on cigarettes.</p><p>This is because I drink but don't smoke.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the fact is that taxes are too high on beer but too low on cigarettes.This is because I drink but do n't smoke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the fact is that taxes are too high on beer but too low on cigarettes.This is because I drink but don't smoke.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667516</id>
	<title>Re:The Berne Convention?</title>
	<author>roman\_mir</author>
	<datestamp>1269982200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't worry about it, people with real talent mostly die relatively young.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry about it , people with real talent mostly die relatively young .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry about it, people with real talent mostly die relatively young.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668810</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>captainpanic</author>
	<datestamp>1269955140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The EU has already adopted the SI system for units. Logically, our other laws are considered superior as well.</p><p>(Yes, I know Canadians, contrary to the US-Americans, use kilometers as well).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The EU has already adopted the SI system for units .
Logically , our other laws are considered superior as well .
( Yes , I know Canadians , contrary to the US-Americans , use kilometers as well ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The EU has already adopted the SI system for units.
Logically, our other laws are considered superior as well.
(Yes, I know Canadians, contrary to the US-Americans, use kilometers as well).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31670948</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269964920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Germany here.<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... snip<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... <br>
So if you ever need to throw over the EU pseudo-government, you got allies here.</p></div><p>What? Germany needs breathing room again?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Germany here .
... snip .. . So if you ever need to throw over the EU pseudo-government , you got allies here.What ?
Germany needs breathing room again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Germany here.
... snip ... 
So if you ever need to throw over the EU pseudo-government, you got allies here.What?
Germany needs breathing room again?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31692556</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>WiiVault</author>
	<datestamp>1270026720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Excuse me? I kind of the doubt the EU wants Canada's Francophone culture when even most Canadians don't. I jest I jest, I love the people of Quebec!  But I know some of my Canadian friends don't share that sentiment.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Excuse me ?
I kind of the doubt the EU wants Canada 's Francophone culture when even most Canadians do n't .
I jest I jest , I love the people of Quebec !
But I know some of my Canadian friends do n't share that sentiment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Excuse me?
I kind of the doubt the EU wants Canada's Francophone culture when even most Canadians don't.
I jest I jest, I love the people of Quebec!
But I know some of my Canadian friends don't share that sentiment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667128</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31690968</id>
	<title>Re:Dear World</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1270063800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's not very Canadian. It should be "Please fuck off, eh."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not very Canadian .
It should be " Please fuck off , eh .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not very Canadian.
It should be "Please fuck off, eh.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667506</id>
	<title>Re:I can't remember...</title>
	<author>WoodenTable</author>
	<datestamp>1269982080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe the correct translation for that here in Canada is "Sorry, eh?"</p><p>We get a lot of use out of the phrase, I'm sure you can imagine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe the correct translation for that here in Canada is " Sorry , eh ?
" We get a lot of use out of the phrase , I 'm sure you can imagine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe the correct translation for that here in Canada is "Sorry, eh?
"We get a lot of use out of the phrase, I'm sure you can imagine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31671206</id>
	<title>Re:I can't remember...</title>
	<author>MikeBabcock</author>
	<datestamp>1269965640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You forgot "no offence"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot " no offence " : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot "no offence" :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669110</id>
	<title>Slashdot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269957240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe I just have read and not paid much attention, maybe slashdot has always been this way... but whats with the amount of articles with titles and basically vague/wrong descriptions seemingly aimed at pushing one countries readers against anothers?</p><p>China vs USA<br>Canada vs EU</p><p>Then if you actually read the articles linked, its nowhere near as serious as the poster makes it out to be.  Like the site, but quality is better than quantity!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I just have read and not paid much attention , maybe slashdot has always been this way... but whats with the amount of articles with titles and basically vague/wrong descriptions seemingly aimed at pushing one countries readers against anothers ? China vs USACanada vs EUThen if you actually read the articles linked , its nowhere near as serious as the poster makes it out to be .
Like the site , but quality is better than quantity !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I just have read and not paid much attention, maybe slashdot has always been this way... but whats with the amount of articles with titles and basically vague/wrong descriptions seemingly aimed at pushing one countries readers against anothers?China vs USACanada vs EUThen if you actually read the articles linked, its nowhere near as serious as the poster makes it out to be.
Like the site, but quality is better than quantity!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668738</id>
	<title>Re:South of the Border</title>
	<author>Splab</author>
	<datestamp>1269954480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The US has what now?</p><p>Are you even living in the same world as the rest of us? The EU very much has the power and is sure as hell wielding it to get, especially, non conformist US corporations to play ball. The EU not only has the power to set the agenda, it has shown willingness to do so - on top of that, the EU has shown it actually works when ACTA got kicked out with 663-13 vote against it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The US has what now ? Are you even living in the same world as the rest of us ?
The EU very much has the power and is sure as hell wielding it to get , especially , non conformist US corporations to play ball .
The EU not only has the power to set the agenda , it has shown willingness to do so - on top of that , the EU has shown it actually works when ACTA got kicked out with 663-13 vote against it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The US has what now?Are you even living in the same world as the rest of us?
The EU very much has the power and is sure as hell wielding it to get, especially, non conformist US corporations to play ball.
The EU not only has the power to set the agenda, it has shown willingness to do so - on top of that, the EU has shown it actually works when ACTA got kicked out with 663-13 vote against it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31673086</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>euxneks</author>
	<datestamp>1269971100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously, as a Canadian this disgusts me. The EU, the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING?</p></div><p>Calm down, mate. If a chief of some remote Polynesian tribe demands tomorrow that all the pale-skins from the Great White North shall submit to the will of his powerful god Yaka-Yaka, or else suffer his wrath, are you going to pay attention as well?</p><p>If not, then treat this case the same way. After all, fundamentally, it is the same.</p></div><p>Though, Yaka Yaka <em>is</em> powerful, you just admitted it yourself!  I bet they have it written down in an old book too, so it must mean it's true!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , as a Canadian this disgusts me .
The EU , the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING ? Calm down , mate .
If a chief of some remote Polynesian tribe demands tomorrow that all the pale-skins from the Great White North shall submit to the will of his powerful god Yaka-Yaka , or else suffer his wrath , are you going to pay attention as well ? If not , then treat this case the same way .
After all , fundamentally , it is the same.Though , Yaka Yaka is powerful , you just admitted it yourself !
I bet they have it written down in an old book too , so it must mean it 's true !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, as a Canadian this disgusts me.
The EU, the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING?Calm down, mate.
If a chief of some remote Polynesian tribe demands tomorrow that all the pale-skins from the Great White North shall submit to the will of his powerful god Yaka-Yaka, or else suffer his wrath, are you going to pay attention as well?If not, then treat this case the same way.
After all, fundamentally, it is the same.Though, Yaka Yaka is powerful, you just admitted it yourself!
I bet they have it written down in an old book too, so it must mean it's true!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669124</id>
	<title>This is translation error.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269957300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The source article originaly was in french, it is EU as in Etas-Unis(united states). Not as European Union.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The source article originaly was in french , it is EU as in Etas-Unis ( united states ) .
Not as European Union .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The source article originaly was in french, it is EU as in Etas-Unis(united states).
Not as European Union.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667478</id>
	<title>Re:Just when you thought there was a glimmer of ho</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269981840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not an EU vs Canada vs US thing.</p><p>It's an administrative branch vs legislative branch thing. The administrative branches of the rich nations have united against their respective legislatures. Unfortunately, the constitutions of the diverse countries usually do not allow the legislatures to unite against their respective governments.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not an EU vs Canada vs US thing.It 's an administrative branch vs legislative branch thing .
The administrative branches of the rich nations have united against their respective legislatures .
Unfortunately , the constitutions of the diverse countries usually do not allow the legislatures to unite against their respective governments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not an EU vs Canada vs US thing.It's an administrative branch vs legislative branch thing.
The administrative branches of the rich nations have united against their respective legislatures.
Unfortunately, the constitutions of the diverse countries usually do not allow the legislatures to unite against their respective governments.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31671458</id>
	<title>Should i start saying</title>
	<author>mcneely.mike</author>
	<datestamp>1269966360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Names Bum... James up my Bum"
<br>
or
<br>
"Who does number 2 work for?.... Oh, the EU."
<br>
or
<br>
"I'm Canadian and the EU is telling me to bend over and take it up the EH!" (Hmmm...actually, i think i'll copyright THIS one!)</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Names Bum... James up my Bum " or " Who does number 2 work for ? ... .
Oh , the EU .
" or " I 'm Canadian and the EU is telling me to bend over and take it up the EH !
" ( Hmmm...actually , i think i 'll copyright THIS one !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Names Bum... James up my Bum"

or

"Who does number 2 work for?....
Oh, the EU.
"

or

"I'm Canadian and the EU is telling me to bend over and take it up the EH!
" (Hmmm...actually, i think i'll copyright THIS one!
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31670862</id>
	<title>Simple reason</title>
	<author>KlausBreuer</author>
	<datestamp>1269964620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Canadians, tell the EU to screw itself over this point.</p><p>Keep in mind that the individual states use the EU to force through lousy ideas and laws (usually bought by the industry), which they cannot do locally.<br>Do it through the EU, though, and they can sob on TV that they hate the idea, but their hands are tied...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Canadians , tell the EU to screw itself over this point.Keep in mind that the individual states use the EU to force through lousy ideas and laws ( usually bought by the industry ) , which they can not do locally.Do it through the EU , though , and they can sob on TV that they hate the idea , but their hands are tied.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Canadians, tell the EU to screw itself over this point.Keep in mind that the individual states use the EU to force through lousy ideas and laws (usually bought by the industry), which they cannot do locally.Do it through the EU, though, and they can sob on TV that they hate the idea, but their hands are tied...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667712</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269941340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They'r already hugely in favour of corporations, mon santo mining corporation current situation rings a bell?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They'r already hugely in favour of corporations , mon santo mining corporation current situation rings a bell ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'r already hugely in favour of corporations, mon santo mining corporation current situation rings a bell?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666832</id>
	<title>Feh</title>
	<author>Reed Solomon</author>
	<datestamp>1269887760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, they also demanded we stop the seal hunt.  Are they going to request that we all wear visors while playing hockey too?  Honestly.  How naive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , they also demanded we stop the seal hunt .
Are they going to request that we all wear visors while playing hockey too ?
Honestly. How naive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, they also demanded we stop the seal hunt.
Are they going to request that we all wear visors while playing hockey too?
Honestly.  How naive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666980</id>
	<title>Re:I can't remember...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269888900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, why don't ya hosers Fuck off, Eh?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , why do n't ya hosers Fuck off , Eh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, why don't ya hosers Fuck off, Eh?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31671424</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>pubwvj</author>
	<datestamp>1269966300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"Seriously, as a Canadian this disgusts me. The EU, the US..."</i></p><p>Hey! Don't blame US! We're getting fucked over too by our government, the international corporations and the new world leaders. Just say <a href="http://nonais.org/" title="nonais.org" rel="nofollow">http://nonais.org/</a> [nonais.org] if you don't get it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Seriously , as a Canadian this disgusts me .
The EU , the US... " Hey !
Do n't blame US !
We 're getting fucked over too by our government , the international corporations and the new world leaders .
Just say http : //nonais.org/ [ nonais.org ] if you do n't get it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Seriously, as a Canadian this disgusts me.
The EU, the US..."Hey!
Don't blame US!
We're getting fucked over too by our government, the international corporations and the new world leaders.
Just say http://nonais.org/ [nonais.org] if you don't get it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667624</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>bigdaisy</author>
	<datestamp>1269940260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As a Canadian this disgusts me. [...] What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING?</p></div><p>All your base are belong to QE2. You are so pwned, innit.</p><p>(Excuse: <a href="http://xkcd.com/166/" title="xkcd.com" rel="nofollow">http://xkcd.com/166/</a> [xkcd.com])</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a Canadian this disgusts me .
[ ... ] What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING ? All your base are belong to QE2 .
You are so pwned , innit .
( Excuse : http : //xkcd.com/166/ [ xkcd.com ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a Canadian this disgusts me.
[...] What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING?All your base are belong to QE2.
You are so pwned, innit.
(Excuse: http://xkcd.com/166/ [xkcd.com])
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667308</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>Gerzel</author>
	<datestamp>1269979800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is difficult to say one way or the other as there is no way to see what things would be like WITHOUT said treaties.</p><p>Wars are more localized to fewer parts of the world in the past 50 years than they were before.  Global Trade while it does have several substantial drawbacks comes with many undeniable benefits.</p><p>Humanity has reached a point where it can influence and change the global environment, thus it may well become, if it is not already, necessary and vital to our survival for a means of regulation and control of our effects on the enviroment.  If a civilization doesn't control that they can kill themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is difficult to say one way or the other as there is no way to see what things would be like WITHOUT said treaties.Wars are more localized to fewer parts of the world in the past 50 years than they were before .
Global Trade while it does have several substantial drawbacks comes with many undeniable benefits.Humanity has reached a point where it can influence and change the global environment , thus it may well become , if it is not already , necessary and vital to our survival for a means of regulation and control of our effects on the enviroment .
If a civilization does n't control that they can kill themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is difficult to say one way or the other as there is no way to see what things would be like WITHOUT said treaties.Wars are more localized to fewer parts of the world in the past 50 years than they were before.
Global Trade while it does have several substantial drawbacks comes with many undeniable benefits.Humanity has reached a point where it can influence and change the global environment, thus it may well become, if it is not already, necessary and vital to our survival for a means of regulation and control of our effects on the enviroment.
If a civilization doesn't control that they can kill themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31670698</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1269964140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, they chased the draft dogers out, which is why we're damned near facist now; the draft dogers were too patriotic to stay here. The US wants your wood, fresh water (only parts of the US, most of us have plenty), its Moosehead Beer, maple syrup (not multiple syrups) and oil.</p><p>Oh, and we want your money, too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , they chased the draft dogers out , which is why we 're damned near facist now ; the draft dogers were too patriotic to stay here .
The US wants your wood , fresh water ( only parts of the US , most of us have plenty ) , its Moosehead Beer , maple syrup ( not multiple syrups ) and oil.Oh , and we want your money , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, they chased the draft dogers out, which is why we're damned near facist now; the draft dogers were too patriotic to stay here.
The US wants your wood, fresh water (only parts of the US, most of us have plenty), its Moosehead Beer, maple syrup (not multiple syrups) and oil.Oh, and we want your money, too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667128</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666844</id>
	<title>51 st state?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269887820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I say we take Alberta first, just to make Ontario Jealous. Then add them one by one, leaving Quebec for last. Just because they're going to be the hardest to convince. I suggest a heavy does of New Orleans style persuasion complete with mardi gras tickets.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I say we take Alberta first , just to make Ontario Jealous .
Then add them one by one , leaving Quebec for last .
Just because they 're going to be the hardest to convince .
I suggest a heavy does of New Orleans style persuasion complete with mardi gras tickets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I say we take Alberta first, just to make Ontario Jealous.
Then add them one by one, leaving Quebec for last.
Just because they're going to be the hardest to convince.
I suggest a heavy does of New Orleans style persuasion complete with mardi gras tickets.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31675492</id>
	<title>Re:I can't remember...</title>
	<author>Zekaric</author>
	<datestamp>1269979980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Seal Toi" (Dan Acroyd, Coneheads reference.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Seal Toi " ( Dan Acroyd , Coneheads reference .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Seal Toi" (Dan Acroyd, Coneheads reference.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668002</id>
	<title>Re:Commission vs Parliament</title>
	<author>zoney\_ie</author>
	<datestamp>1269945180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The EU commission is nominated by the member state governments. Another executive branch is the Council of the EU (Council of Ministers) which consists of the relevant government ministers from member states (e.g. Agriculture ministers for decisions in Agriculture). Also general direction of the EU is set by the European Council (heads of governments in the EU).</p><p>The EU parliament is quite rightly a minor part of EU governance as pretty much all EU member state governments and public want the EU to remain a collaboration between member states, *not* some kind of federal state. The Lisbon Treaty that we voted for here in Ireland on the second opportunity (after the mainstream parties screwed up their first campaign, yet again expecting it to be automatically passed in the case of the disliked government, or using it for electioneering of candidates for upcoming local elections in the case of the opposition) does provide it with a more definitive role in oversight of the actions of the Commission, which is quite appropriate and sensible.</p><p>A more elected or directly democratic EU would not be compatible with leaving power in the hands of people's elected governments.</p><p>The UK government are very disingenious most of the time when bad-mouthing the EU and blaming it for decisions that a) the UK government negogiated and approved, or even instigated, and b) aren't EU policy at all but just over-zealous national implementations of EU directives (or even just entirely superfluous additions to the law) that the UK state government desires to further control their citizens. The EU has in fact on many occasions acted against the UK's attempts to control her citizens. The British media are anti-EU simply because the public are anti-EU due to the government's actions and criticism of EU, as well as national biases against European neighbours, and so the "EU is bad" stories sell more papers! However, it is a vicious cycle and so the media further contribute to this situation.</p><p>As far as I'm concerned, the greatest threat to Europe as a whole is the direction that the UK chooses (I cannot see the Tories being good for either Union, the European one or the domestic one, and the current lot are about out of ideas in fixing the country). Indeed the UK's economic footing is of more concern than Greece in my opinion, the scale is so much greater and the situation is almost as bad. Flexibility offered by the pound may help short-term but in the long-term it is those short-term fixes as well as not having "bail-out partners" due to being in with others on a currency that may mean the UK's downfall. They are very exposed if the pound crashes due to speculators or domestic crisis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The EU commission is nominated by the member state governments .
Another executive branch is the Council of the EU ( Council of Ministers ) which consists of the relevant government ministers from member states ( e.g .
Agriculture ministers for decisions in Agriculture ) .
Also general direction of the EU is set by the European Council ( heads of governments in the EU ) .The EU parliament is quite rightly a minor part of EU governance as pretty much all EU member state governments and public want the EU to remain a collaboration between member states , * not * some kind of federal state .
The Lisbon Treaty that we voted for here in Ireland on the second opportunity ( after the mainstream parties screwed up their first campaign , yet again expecting it to be automatically passed in the case of the disliked government , or using it for electioneering of candidates for upcoming local elections in the case of the opposition ) does provide it with a more definitive role in oversight of the actions of the Commission , which is quite appropriate and sensible.A more elected or directly democratic EU would not be compatible with leaving power in the hands of people 's elected governments.The UK government are very disingenious most of the time when bad-mouthing the EU and blaming it for decisions that a ) the UK government negogiated and approved , or even instigated , and b ) are n't EU policy at all but just over-zealous national implementations of EU directives ( or even just entirely superfluous additions to the law ) that the UK state government desires to further control their citizens .
The EU has in fact on many occasions acted against the UK 's attempts to control her citizens .
The British media are anti-EU simply because the public are anti-EU due to the government 's actions and criticism of EU , as well as national biases against European neighbours , and so the " EU is bad " stories sell more papers !
However , it is a vicious cycle and so the media further contribute to this situation.As far as I 'm concerned , the greatest threat to Europe as a whole is the direction that the UK chooses ( I can not see the Tories being good for either Union , the European one or the domestic one , and the current lot are about out of ideas in fixing the country ) .
Indeed the UK 's economic footing is of more concern than Greece in my opinion , the scale is so much greater and the situation is almost as bad .
Flexibility offered by the pound may help short-term but in the long-term it is those short-term fixes as well as not having " bail-out partners " due to being in with others on a currency that may mean the UK 's downfall .
They are very exposed if the pound crashes due to speculators or domestic crisis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The EU commission is nominated by the member state governments.
Another executive branch is the Council of the EU (Council of Ministers) which consists of the relevant government ministers from member states (e.g.
Agriculture ministers for decisions in Agriculture).
Also general direction of the EU is set by the European Council (heads of governments in the EU).The EU parliament is quite rightly a minor part of EU governance as pretty much all EU member state governments and public want the EU to remain a collaboration between member states, *not* some kind of federal state.
The Lisbon Treaty that we voted for here in Ireland on the second opportunity (after the mainstream parties screwed up their first campaign, yet again expecting it to be automatically passed in the case of the disliked government, or using it for electioneering of candidates for upcoming local elections in the case of the opposition) does provide it with a more definitive role in oversight of the actions of the Commission, which is quite appropriate and sensible.A more elected or directly democratic EU would not be compatible with leaving power in the hands of people's elected governments.The UK government are very disingenious most of the time when bad-mouthing the EU and blaming it for decisions that a) the UK government negogiated and approved, or even instigated, and b) aren't EU policy at all but just over-zealous national implementations of EU directives (or even just entirely superfluous additions to the law) that the UK state government desires to further control their citizens.
The EU has in fact on many occasions acted against the UK's attempts to control her citizens.
The British media are anti-EU simply because the public are anti-EU due to the government's actions and criticism of EU, as well as national biases against European neighbours, and so the "EU is bad" stories sell more papers!
However, it is a vicious cycle and so the media further contribute to this situation.As far as I'm concerned, the greatest threat to Europe as a whole is the direction that the UK chooses (I cannot see the Tories being good for either Union, the European one or the domestic one, and the current lot are about out of ideas in fixing the country).
Indeed the UK's economic footing is of more concern than Greece in my opinion, the scale is so much greater and the situation is almost as bad.
Flexibility offered by the pound may help short-term but in the long-term it is those short-term fixes as well as not having "bail-out partners" due to being in with others on a currency that may mean the UK's downfall.
They are very exposed if the pound crashes due to speculators or domestic crisis.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667122</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269890820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stop whining and get back to your pot. It's a brave new world.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stop whining and get back to your pot .
It 's a brave new world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stop whining and get back to your pot.
It's a brave new world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667108</id>
	<title>Re:I can't remember...</title>
	<author>Jettamann</author>
	<datestamp>1269890580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like this: "Hey, EU!! fuck off, Eh!"</p><p>where EU is pronounced like "ewe".</p><p>Of course our current "got no balls of a Prime Minister Harper will end up taking it from<br>
&nbsp; behind like sheep on this issue"<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like this : " Hey , EU ! !
fuck off , Eh !
" where EU is pronounced like " ewe " .Of course our current " got no balls of a Prime Minister Harper will end up taking it from   behind like sheep on this issue "  </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like this: "Hey, EU!!
fuck off, Eh!
"where EU is pronounced like "ewe".Of course our current "got no balls of a Prime Minister Harper will end up taking it from
  behind like sheep on this issue"
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666830</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269887700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Global harmonization through treaties is creating a race to the bottom as far as the citizen's general welfare is concerned.</p><p>I can't imagine why Canada is still negotiating such a treaty when it seems to be so insanely one-sided.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Global harmonization through treaties is creating a race to the bottom as far as the citizen 's general welfare is concerned.I ca n't imagine why Canada is still negotiating such a treaty when it seems to be so insanely one-sided .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Global harmonization through treaties is creating a race to the bottom as far as the citizen's general welfare is concerned.I can't imagine why Canada is still negotiating such a treaty when it seems to be so insanely one-sided.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31675360</id>
	<title>Why deal with the EU when Russia is next door?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269979560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We've really got to stand up to this kind of bullying. There is no good reason why we should give such preference to the EU, particularly when Russia is our next door neighbour and shares a similar territory and climate to Canada. I doubt that the Russian Federation or the Commonwealth of Independent States would make such outrageous demands in return for favoured trading status.</p><p>Russia Yes!, Europe No!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 've really got to stand up to this kind of bullying .
There is no good reason why we should give such preference to the EU , particularly when Russia is our next door neighbour and shares a similar territory and climate to Canada .
I doubt that the Russian Federation or the Commonwealth of Independent States would make such outrageous demands in return for favoured trading status.Russia Yes ! , Europe No !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We've really got to stand up to this kind of bullying.
There is no good reason why we should give such preference to the EU, particularly when Russia is our next door neighbour and shares a similar territory and climate to Canada.
I doubt that the Russian Federation or the Commonwealth of Independent States would make such outrageous demands in return for favoured trading status.Russia Yes!, Europe No!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852</id>
	<title>What the hell?</title>
	<author>Goldberg's Pants</author>
	<datestamp>1269887880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, as a Canadian this disgusts me. The EU, the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING?</p><p>Makes me absolutely sick to read this. There is nothing wrong with Canada's laws. And that is exactly why they want it changed, so there IS something wrong with it to throw the balance off hugely in favour of coporations.</p><p>Despicable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , as a Canadian this disgusts me .
The EU , the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING ? Makes me absolutely sick to read this .
There is nothing wrong with Canada 's laws .
And that is exactly why they want it changed , so there IS something wrong with it to throw the balance off hugely in favour of coporations.Despicable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, as a Canadian this disgusts me.
The EU, the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING?Makes me absolutely sick to read this.
There is nothing wrong with Canada's laws.
And that is exactly why they want it changed, so there IS something wrong with it to throw the balance off hugely in favour of coporations.Despicable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667024</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>tsotha</author>
	<datestamp>1269889380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wouldn't say there's <i>nothing</i> wrong with Canada's laws.  Taxes are way too high on beer and cigarettes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would n't say there 's nothing wrong with Canada 's laws .
Taxes are way too high on beer and cigarettes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn't say there's nothing wrong with Canada's laws.
Taxes are way too high on beer and cigarettes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668396</id>
	<title>Re:The Berne Convention?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269950760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If human lifespan in becoming longer, shouldn't copyright extensions past an author's life be shortened instead of lengthened?</p></div><p>Actually, the initial point of the life+x years was to allow the author's children to be supported by the work. A longer lifespan thus should lengthen the extensions past an author's life to match.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If human lifespan in becoming longer , should n't copyright extensions past an author 's life be shortened instead of lengthened ? Actually , the initial point of the life + x years was to allow the author 's children to be supported by the work .
A longer lifespan thus should lengthen the extensions past an author 's life to match .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If human lifespan in becoming longer, shouldn't copyright extensions past an author's life be shortened instead of lengthened?Actually, the initial point of the life+x years was to allow the author's children to be supported by the work.
A longer lifespan thus should lengthen the extensions past an author's life to match.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666820</id>
	<title>Our new overlords</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269887700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I, for one, welcome our new EU Overlords!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I , for one , welcome our new EU Overlords !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, for one, welcome our new EU Overlords!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668268</id>
	<title>Embarrasing for us people in the EU</title>
	<author>nxsty</author>
	<datestamp>1269948900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We've never given the commission a democratic mandate to parcipate in negotiations like this, and we can't remove them if we don't like what they do since they're not democratically elected. Yet the're representing us, trying to enforce a position that a lot of europes wouldn't support.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 've never given the commission a democratic mandate to parcipate in negotiations like this , and we ca n't remove them if we do n't like what they do since they 're not democratically elected .
Yet the 're representing us , trying to enforce a position that a lot of europes would n't support .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We've never given the commission a democratic mandate to parcipate in negotiations like this, and we can't remove them if we don't like what they do since they're not democratically elected.
Yet the're representing us, trying to enforce a position that a lot of europes wouldn't support.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31672848</id>
	<title>Re:The Berne Convention?</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1269970380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Both author and copyright are ancillary to corporate profit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Both author and copyright are ancillary to corporate profit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Both author and copyright are ancillary to corporate profit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667038</id>
	<title>Re:I can't remember...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269889560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Excuse me, sir, but would you please be so kind as to fuck off? Sorry to bother you again."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Excuse me , sir , but would you please be so kind as to fuck off ?
Sorry to bother you again .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Excuse me, sir, but would you please be so kind as to fuck off?
Sorry to bother you again.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667092</id>
	<title>Let me guess...</title>
	<author>calmofthestorm</author>
	<datestamp>1269890460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...it doesn't involve granting more protections to the consumer or public interest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...it does n't involve granting more protections to the consumer or public interest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...it doesn't involve granting more protections to the consumer or public interest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668582</id>
	<title>Global harmonisation. No escape.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269952920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I cringe when I read about any treaty or legislation intended to implement "global harmonisation" on the way things are run. It implies that there is a best way of doing things, which might be true if all people had the same ambitions and circumstances - but they don't.</p><p>There is no one best way of doing things. Global harmonisation will be a disaster for at least a large minority of people (and possibly the majority) who will be left with nowhere to flee to escape the new rules.</p><p>The same is happening with multiculturalism. In its name we are lead to believe that all cultures are to be celebrated, but in reality, all cultures are gutted and toned down in order for them to be able to sit side by side. In the end, there is nothing of substance left of any culture which exists in a multicultural environment except for a few meaningless symbols. All they will be left with is the shopping mall, and that, of course, is the whole point of multiculturalism - cheap labour who can believe what they like so long as they work hard and spend money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I cringe when I read about any treaty or legislation intended to implement " global harmonisation " on the way things are run .
It implies that there is a best way of doing things , which might be true if all people had the same ambitions and circumstances - but they do n't.There is no one best way of doing things .
Global harmonisation will be a disaster for at least a large minority of people ( and possibly the majority ) who will be left with nowhere to flee to escape the new rules.The same is happening with multiculturalism .
In its name we are lead to believe that all cultures are to be celebrated , but in reality , all cultures are gutted and toned down in order for them to be able to sit side by side .
In the end , there is nothing of substance left of any culture which exists in a multicultural environment except for a few meaningless symbols .
All they will be left with is the shopping mall , and that , of course , is the whole point of multiculturalism - cheap labour who can believe what they like so long as they work hard and spend money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I cringe when I read about any treaty or legislation intended to implement "global harmonisation" on the way things are run.
It implies that there is a best way of doing things, which might be true if all people had the same ambitions and circumstances - but they don't.There is no one best way of doing things.
Global harmonisation will be a disaster for at least a large minority of people (and possibly the majority) who will be left with nowhere to flee to escape the new rules.The same is happening with multiculturalism.
In its name we are lead to believe that all cultures are to be celebrated, but in reality, all cultures are gutted and toned down in order for them to be able to sit side by side.
In the end, there is nothing of substance left of any culture which exists in a multicultural environment except for a few meaningless symbols.
All they will be left with is the shopping mall, and that, of course, is the whole point of multiculturalism - cheap labour who can believe what they like so long as they work hard and spend money.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668372</id>
	<title>Re:WTH</title>
	<author>Bugamn</author>
	<datestamp>1269950520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, Canada's Queen lives in EU.
All Hail the Queen!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , Canada 's Queen lives in EU .
All Hail the Queen !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, Canada's Queen lives in EU.
All Hail the Queen!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668044</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269945720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Despite the fact that we didn&rsquo;t ever elect them, they are called &ldquo;our&rdquo; government.</p></div><p>You did not vote for the commission, but the parliament did, and every adult EU citizen had a chance to elect the parliament. Which does not make it so much different from countries were people elect a parliament, which then elects the government - like it is the case in Germany.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Despite the fact that we didn    t ever elect them , they are called    our    government.You did not vote for the commission , but the parliament did , and every adult EU citizen had a chance to elect the parliament .
Which does not make it so much different from countries were people elect a parliament , which then elects the government - like it is the case in Germany .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Despite the fact that we didn’t ever elect them, they are called “our” government.You did not vote for the commission, but the parliament did, and every adult EU citizen had a chance to elect the parliament.
Which does not make it so much different from countries were people elect a parliament, which then elects the government - like it is the case in Germany.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668494</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1269951900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Probably, but we EUians need those resources. It's not like we got an oilflood somewhere around, or too much timber (well, with a few noteworthy exceptions like Sweden, but given their laws I'd guess they would not enjoy clear-cutting their forests).</p><p>You may be desperate to sell, but we're at least as desperate to buy. And, let's face it, it's not like it's hard to sell oil or timber somewhere else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably , but we EUians need those resources .
It 's not like we got an oilflood somewhere around , or too much timber ( well , with a few noteworthy exceptions like Sweden , but given their laws I 'd guess they would not enjoy clear-cutting their forests ) .You may be desperate to sell , but we 're at least as desperate to buy .
And , let 's face it , it 's not like it 's hard to sell oil or timber somewhere else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably, but we EUians need those resources.
It's not like we got an oilflood somewhere around, or too much timber (well, with a few noteworthy exceptions like Sweden, but given their laws I'd guess they would not enjoy clear-cutting their forests).You may be desperate to sell, but we're at least as desperate to buy.
And, let's face it, it's not like it's hard to sell oil or timber somewhere else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667694</id>
	<title>Re:South of the Border</title>
	<author>pydev</author>
	<datestamp>1269941100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Canada is not in a position to tell anybody to "piss off", they are far too dependent on the US and the EU.</p><p>The place to get things changed is primarily in the US, because the US is both big enough to determine the global agenda and still has a far more functional democracy than the EU.</p><p>The EU in principle has the power to do good, but it is hopeless with its anti-democratic Commission, impotent parliament, squabbling national governments, and enormous bureaucracy.  The EU make the US look like a shining beacon of a working democracy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Canada is not in a position to tell anybody to " piss off " , they are far too dependent on the US and the EU.The place to get things changed is primarily in the US , because the US is both big enough to determine the global agenda and still has a far more functional democracy than the EU.The EU in principle has the power to do good , but it is hopeless with its anti-democratic Commission , impotent parliament , squabbling national governments , and enormous bureaucracy .
The EU make the US look like a shining beacon of a working democracy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Canada is not in a position to tell anybody to "piss off", they are far too dependent on the US and the EU.The place to get things changed is primarily in the US, because the US is both big enough to determine the global agenda and still has a far more functional democracy than the EU.The EU in principle has the power to do good, but it is hopeless with its anti-democratic Commission, impotent parliament, squabbling national governments, and enormous bureaucracy.
The EU make the US look like a shining beacon of a working democracy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667278</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31678466</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269947220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously, as a Canadian this disgusts me. The EU, the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING?</p></div><p>Much larger military. That's what. Let's not forget missiles and mutual-defense agreements.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , as a Canadian this disgusts me .
The EU , the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING ? Much larger military .
That 's what .
Let 's not forget missiles and mutual-defense agreements .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, as a Canadian this disgusts me.
The EU, the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING?Much larger military.
That's what.
Let's not forget missiles and mutual-defense agreements.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31670252</id>
	<title>Or What?</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1269962700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously. The USA is by FAR our biggest trading partner. They have been trying to bend us over for years about IP, Copyright and Patent law. If we are not about to capitulate the them, what makes the EU think we give a flying fuck what they say....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously .
The USA is by FAR our biggest trading partner .
They have been trying to bend us over for years about IP , Copyright and Patent law .
If we are not about to capitulate the them , what makes the EU think we give a flying fuck what they say... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.
The USA is by FAR our biggest trading partner.
They have been trying to bend us over for years about IP, Copyright and Patent law.
If we are not about to capitulate the them, what makes the EU think we give a flying fuck what they say....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667606</id>
	<title>Wait for it...</title>
	<author>sonicmerlin</author>
	<datestamp>1269939960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Notably, the draft includes many new rights for broadcasters.  These rights form part of a proposed Broadcast Treaty at WIPO that has failed to achieve consensus.  The EU is seeking to build support for the treaty by requiring Canada to implement many new provisions that would give broadcasters a host of new rights and force public places to pay additional fees for carry broadcasts."

</p><p>So... in other words they want places that provide public benefit to pay more money to people who don't.  That's... rational...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Notably , the draft includes many new rights for broadcasters .
These rights form part of a proposed Broadcast Treaty at WIPO that has failed to achieve consensus .
The EU is seeking to build support for the treaty by requiring Canada to implement many new provisions that would give broadcasters a host of new rights and force public places to pay additional fees for carry broadcasts .
" So... in other words they want places that provide public benefit to pay more money to people who do n't .
That 's... rational.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Notably, the draft includes many new rights for broadcasters.
These rights form part of a proposed Broadcast Treaty at WIPO that has failed to achieve consensus.
The EU is seeking to build support for the treaty by requiring Canada to implement many new provisions that would give broadcasters a host of new rights and force public places to pay additional fees for carry broadcasts.
"

So... in other words they want places that provide public benefit to pay more money to people who don't.
That's... rational...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669948</id>
	<title>Judge Dredd</title>
	<author>Midnight Thunder</author>
	<datestamp>1269961620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Global harmonization through treaties is creating a race to the bottom as far as the citizen's general welfare is concerned.</i></p><p>When I see films, or read books, such as Judge Dredd I wonder how could this shit become reality? I ask myself whether there would be enough external sources to ensure a general liberty and rights of it citizens? Then I see shit like ACTA and this happening and I suddenly understand - scary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Global harmonization through treaties is creating a race to the bottom as far as the citizen 's general welfare is concerned.When I see films , or read books , such as Judge Dredd I wonder how could this shit become reality ?
I ask myself whether there would be enough external sources to ensure a general liberty and rights of it citizens ?
Then I see shit like ACTA and this happening and I suddenly understand - scary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Global harmonization through treaties is creating a race to the bottom as far as the citizen's general welfare is concerned.When I see films, or read books, such as Judge Dredd I wonder how could this shit become reality?
I ask myself whether there would be enough external sources to ensure a general liberty and rights of it citizens?
Then I see shit like ACTA and this happening and I suddenly understand - scary.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667326</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269980040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Er, because the EU is a bigger market than the USA?<br>You want to trade in a market comprising nigh on half a billion people?<br>Sign on the dotted line please.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Er , because the EU is a bigger market than the USA ? You want to trade in a market comprising nigh on half a billion people ? Sign on the dotted line please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Er, because the EU is a bigger market than the USA?You want to trade in a market comprising nigh on half a billion people?Sign on the dotted line please.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31671306</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>MikeBabcock</author>
	<datestamp>1269966000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Demands don't bug me.  I'm proud to say we rarely cave in to this type of pressure.  We still don't have the DMCA like laws the Americans want us to have, and I hope we don't go this route either.</p><p>While you're up in arms about it though, go write to the people in charge <a href="http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/crp-prda.nsf/eng/rp00064.html" title="ic.gc.ca">like I did</a> [ic.gc.ca] and get your voice on file.  It matters.</p><p>It may not be as eloquent as some people, but every thought counts I figure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Demands do n't bug me .
I 'm proud to say we rarely cave in to this type of pressure .
We still do n't have the DMCA like laws the Americans want us to have , and I hope we do n't go this route either.While you 're up in arms about it though , go write to the people in charge like I did [ ic.gc.ca ] and get your voice on file .
It matters.It may not be as eloquent as some people , but every thought counts I figure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Demands don't bug me.
I'm proud to say we rarely cave in to this type of pressure.
We still don't have the DMCA like laws the Americans want us to have, and I hope we don't go this route either.While you're up in arms about it though, go write to the people in charge like I did [ic.gc.ca] and get your voice on file.
It matters.It may not be as eloquent as some people, but every thought counts I figure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669664</id>
	<title>Eurotrash</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269960240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Eat shit and die.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Eat shit and die .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eat shit and die.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667042</id>
	<title>Re:I can't remember...</title>
	<author>capebretonsux</author>
	<datestamp>1269889680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That entirely depends in what province you're in.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That entirely depends in what province you 're in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That entirely depends in what province you're in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31670340</id>
	<title>Re:I can't remember...</title>
	<author>Dancindan84</author>
	<datestamp>1269963000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Get lost you freaking hoser!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Get lost you freaking hoser !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get lost you freaking hoser!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668240</id>
	<title>Re:Commission vs Parliament</title>
	<author>Unipuma</author>
	<datestamp>1269948600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Currently, the European Parliament doesn't hold much power, although the Lisbon treaty did increase their power somewhat. You will either see idealistic people in the European Parliament, or people who more or less just collect a paycheck.<br>I'm somewhat afraid though what would happen should the EP get more power. This would suddenly make the members of parliament interesting for the lobbyists, and I wonder how long it will take before the bunch of them start making the same decisions that the EC is currently making. The EP might be doing its good work because it hasn't become a target yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Currently , the European Parliament does n't hold much power , although the Lisbon treaty did increase their power somewhat .
You will either see idealistic people in the European Parliament , or people who more or less just collect a paycheck.I 'm somewhat afraid though what would happen should the EP get more power .
This would suddenly make the members of parliament interesting for the lobbyists , and I wonder how long it will take before the bunch of them start making the same decisions that the EC is currently making .
The EP might be doing its good work because it has n't become a target yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Currently, the European Parliament doesn't hold much power, although the Lisbon treaty did increase their power somewhat.
You will either see idealistic people in the European Parliament, or people who more or less just collect a paycheck.I'm somewhat afraid though what would happen should the EP get more power.
This would suddenly make the members of parliament interesting for the lobbyists, and I wonder how long it will take before the bunch of them start making the same decisions that the EC is currently making.
The EP might be doing its good work because it hasn't become a target yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667878</id>
	<title>Who in the EU is negotiating this?</title>
	<author>Aceticon</author>
	<datestamp>1269943500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the EU bureaucracy, power is pretty much split into 3 blocks:<br>- The European Commission - non-elected, nominated and agreed by and between the countries governments<br>- The Council of Europe - representatives of each country's governments<br>- The European Parliement - directly elected</p><p>Somehow I suspect this treaty is being negociated by the European Commission, same as ACTA. That would make the "EU's" demands it contains not surprising at all: the Commission is (unsurprisingly) the one force in Europe which is deepest in the pocket of corporate special interests (for example, they were the ones that wanted Software Patents in Europe).</p><p>The European Parliement on the other hand tends to side more with Citizens and Consumers (again, unsurprisingly).</p><p>The funny bit is that, if the Commission does manage to get this treaty signed by Canada, it might still be voted down in Europe by the European Parliement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the EU bureaucracy , power is pretty much split into 3 blocks : - The European Commission - non-elected , nominated and agreed by and between the countries governments- The Council of Europe - representatives of each country 's governments- The European Parliement - directly electedSomehow I suspect this treaty is being negociated by the European Commission , same as ACTA .
That would make the " EU 's " demands it contains not surprising at all : the Commission is ( unsurprisingly ) the one force in Europe which is deepest in the pocket of corporate special interests ( for example , they were the ones that wanted Software Patents in Europe ) .The European Parliement on the other hand tends to side more with Citizens and Consumers ( again , unsurprisingly ) .The funny bit is that , if the Commission does manage to get this treaty signed by Canada , it might still be voted down in Europe by the European Parliement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the EU bureaucracy, power is pretty much split into 3 blocks:- The European Commission - non-elected, nominated and agreed by and between the countries governments- The Council of Europe - representatives of each country's governments- The European Parliement - directly electedSomehow I suspect this treaty is being negociated by the European Commission, same as ACTA.
That would make the "EU's" demands it contains not surprising at all: the Commission is (unsurprisingly) the one force in Europe which is deepest in the pocket of corporate special interests (for example, they were the ones that wanted Software Patents in Europe).The European Parliement on the other hand tends to side more with Citizens and Consumers (again, unsurprisingly).The funny bit is that, if the Commission does manage to get this treaty signed by Canada, it might still be voted down in Europe by the European Parliement.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667256</id>
	<title>In exchange of what, and who is paying for it?</title>
	<author>kikito</author>
	<datestamp>1269892740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I will not pay for this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I will not pay for this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I will not pay for this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668076</id>
	<title>Re:I can't remember...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269946320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fuck EU!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck EU !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck EU!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669022</id>
	<title>Re:South of the Border</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269956640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Present the <i>digitus impudicus</i>.</p></div><p>You hit the nail on the head. If Canada don't comply we'll set Harry Potter and his school chums on you...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Present the digitus impudicus.You hit the nail on the head .
If Canada do n't comply we 'll set Harry Potter and his school chums on you.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Present the digitus impudicus.You hit the nail on the head.
If Canada don't comply we'll set Harry Potter and his school chums on you...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667278</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667046</id>
	<title>Re:What the hell?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269889680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously, as a Canadian this disgusts me. The EU, the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING?</p></div><p>Calm down, mate. If a chief of some remote Polynesian tribe demands tomorrow that all the pale-skins from the Great White North shall submit to the will of his powerful god Yaka-Yaka, or else suffer his wrath, are you going to pay attention as well?</p><p>If not, then treat this case the same way. After all, fundamentally, it is the same.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , as a Canadian this disgusts me .
The EU , the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING ? Calm down , mate .
If a chief of some remote Polynesian tribe demands tomorrow that all the pale-skins from the Great White North shall submit to the will of his powerful god Yaka-Yaka , or else suffer his wrath , are you going to pay attention as well ? If not , then treat this case the same way .
After all , fundamentally , it is the same .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, as a Canadian this disgusts me.
The EU, the US... What the hell gives these assholes the right to demand ANYTHING?Calm down, mate.
If a chief of some remote Polynesian tribe demands tomorrow that all the pale-skins from the Great White North shall submit to the will of his powerful god Yaka-Yaka, or else suffer his wrath, are you going to pay attention as well?If not, then treat this case the same way.
After all, fundamentally, it is the same.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31670340
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31672028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667712
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31670698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31678466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31692556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669048
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31671424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31672194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31675492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31671206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31672848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31672326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31690968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31671964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669022
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31670890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31673086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31670948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668528
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31671704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31671306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31717542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_30_0241257_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31674494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_0241257.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669022
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31670890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667694
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669768
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668738
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_0241257.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668570
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31690968
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_0241257.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31672326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667046
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31673086
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31672194
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31671424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31671306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667004
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31670948
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31678466
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31674494
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666984
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668494
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667024
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669456
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667712
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_0241257.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669048
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667128
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31670698
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31692556
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31669948
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_0241257.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666844
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31717542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31672028
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_0241257.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666832
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_0241257.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666816
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_0241257.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666826
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_0241257.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667634
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_0241257.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666862
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_0241257.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666896
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667064
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668002
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667478
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_0241257.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667038
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31671704
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31671206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667686
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31671964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31675492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31670340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667042
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_0241257.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667214
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_0241257.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31672848
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_30_0241257.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31666850
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667138
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31668372
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_30_0241257.31667186
</commentlist>
</conversation>
