<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_29_1241212</id>
	<title>Fatty Foods May Cause Cocaine-Like Addiction</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1269867600000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>WrongSizeGlass writes <i>"A new study in rats suggests that high-fat, <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/03/28/fatty.foods.brain/">high-calorie foods affect the brain in much the same way as cocaine and heroin</a>.  The rats that gorged themselves on the human food quickly became obese."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>WrongSizeGlass writes " A new study in rats suggests that high-fat , high-calorie foods affect the brain in much the same way as cocaine and heroin .
The rats that gorged themselves on the human food quickly became obese .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WrongSizeGlass writes "A new study in rats suggests that high-fat, high-calorie foods affect the brain in much the same way as cocaine and heroin.
The rats that gorged themselves on the human food quickly became obese.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658148</id>
	<title>Re:Why I am not surprised ? Oh...</title>
	<author>Xtravar</author>
	<datestamp>1269881460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm planning on watching the rebuttal to Supersize Me at some point: <a href="http://www.fathead-movie.com/" title="fathead-movie.com">http://www.fathead-movie.com/</a> [fathead-movie.com]<br>Supposedly the dude loses weight by... eating at a fast food restaurant every day.  Just by cutting out the carbs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm planning on watching the rebuttal to Supersize Me at some point : http : //www.fathead-movie.com/ [ fathead-movie.com ] Supposedly the dude loses weight by... eating at a fast food restaurant every day .
Just by cutting out the carbs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm planning on watching the rebuttal to Supersize Me at some point: http://www.fathead-movie.com/ [fathead-movie.com]Supposedly the dude loses weight by... eating at a fast food restaurant every day.
Just by cutting out the carbs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656342</id>
	<title>Anyone else worry about junk science like this?</title>
	<author>unkaggregate</author>
	<datestamp>1269874080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Okay, so rats gorged themselves on fatty sugary food. Fine, but I worry when junk scientists try to equate that to hard drugs, because you just know sooner or later that will be picked up by someone who needs an excuse to ban this or that. How much do you want to bet within 4 years some politician will pick this up and use it to push a law banning some kind of fatty food? After all, this study says that they're addictive just like that evil cocaine!</p><p>Just a comment on the recent trend of lawmaking...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay , so rats gorged themselves on fatty sugary food .
Fine , but I worry when junk scientists try to equate that to hard drugs , because you just know sooner or later that will be picked up by someone who needs an excuse to ban this or that .
How much do you want to bet within 4 years some politician will pick this up and use it to push a law banning some kind of fatty food ?
After all , this study says that they 're addictive just like that evil cocaine ! Just a comment on the recent trend of lawmaking.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay, so rats gorged themselves on fatty sugary food.
Fine, but I worry when junk scientists try to equate that to hard drugs, because you just know sooner or later that will be picked up by someone who needs an excuse to ban this or that.
How much do you want to bet within 4 years some politician will pick this up and use it to push a law banning some kind of fatty food?
After all, this study says that they're addictive just like that evil cocaine!Just a comment on the recent trend of lawmaking...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655900</id>
	<title>That's nothing compare to the News that</title>
	<author>viraltus</author>
	<datestamp>1269871680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cocaine May Cause Fatty Foods-Like Addiction</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cocaine May Cause Fatty Foods-Like Addiction</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cocaine May Cause Fatty Foods-Like Addiction</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658554</id>
	<title>Re:You think kicking food is hard, try sleep!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269883320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ever breathe air, kid?<br>Don't start.<br>Me, I'm hooked.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; -- Muddy Mudskipper</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ever breathe air , kid ? Do n't start.Me , I 'm hooked .
    -- Muddy Mudskipper</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ever breathe air, kid?Don't start.Me, I'm hooked.
    -- Muddy Mudskipper</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657004</id>
	<title>Re:Funny...</title>
	<author>thePowerOfGrayskull</author>
	<datestamp>1269877020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem I've seen in too many people who follow the high fat/low carb option is that they inevitably gain it back.  I've no speculation as to why, it's just something I've seen happen far more often than not -- not universally though. I'm also curious if you've checked your cholesterol lately?
<p>
I've lost 40lbs+ recently as well, and did it by eating smaller portions and walking my dogs four nights a week... blood pressure and cholesterol (both of which had been high) are now within normal range.  I also increased the ratio of vegetables to everything else on my plate.  As you said eating when hungry is important too- conversely, NOT eating when NOT hungry is very important too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem I 've seen in too many people who follow the high fat/low carb option is that they inevitably gain it back .
I 've no speculation as to why , it 's just something I 've seen happen far more often than not -- not universally though .
I 'm also curious if you 've checked your cholesterol lately ?
I 've lost 40lbs + recently as well , and did it by eating smaller portions and walking my dogs four nights a week... blood pressure and cholesterol ( both of which had been high ) are now within normal range .
I also increased the ratio of vegetables to everything else on my plate .
As you said eating when hungry is important too- conversely , NOT eating when NOT hungry is very important too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem I've seen in too many people who follow the high fat/low carb option is that they inevitably gain it back.
I've no speculation as to why, it's just something I've seen happen far more often than not -- not universally though.
I'm also curious if you've checked your cholesterol lately?
I've lost 40lbs+ recently as well, and did it by eating smaller portions and walking my dogs four nights a week... blood pressure and cholesterol (both of which had been high) are now within normal range.
I also increased the ratio of vegetables to everything else on my plate.
As you said eating when hungry is important too- conversely, NOT eating when NOT hungry is very important too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655818</id>
	<title>That explains a lot.</title>
	<author>dmgxmichael</author>
	<datestamp>1269871260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>BUURPP!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>BUURPP !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BUURPP!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656914</id>
	<title>Re:Funny...</title>
	<author>Delifisek</author>
	<datestamp>1269876660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Absolutely.</p><p>High fat low car, not exercising and melting with just sitting. Last Summer I lost 15 kg. Just not eating carbs...</p><p>And I agree maintaining low carb dies is hard and expensive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Absolutely.High fat low car , not exercising and melting with just sitting .
Last Summer I lost 15 kg .
Just not eating carbs...And I agree maintaining low carb dies is hard and expensive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Absolutely.High fat low car, not exercising and melting with just sitting.
Last Summer I lost 15 kg.
Just not eating carbs...And I agree maintaining low carb dies is hard and expensive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657340</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, I can see that...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269878340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Canning depletes many nutrients, and check the labels -- a lot of canned goods (as well as everything else) have loads of corn syrup. The best way for the poor to eat healthy is to grow a garden; that's what I did when I was poor, and what's more the food tastes a lot better than anything you can buy.</p><p>Second best is the most expensive, that's at the farmer's market.</p><p>After that is frozen; I always thought I hated peas until I ate fresh ones, turns out it's just canned peas I hate, frozen are almost as good as fresh.</p><p>Many of the poor have the added disadvantage of having no transportation, making them spend more than they can afford on poor nutrition foods, because they're limited to the bus line. You can't buy what you cant reach.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Canning depletes many nutrients , and check the labels -- a lot of canned goods ( as well as everything else ) have loads of corn syrup .
The best way for the poor to eat healthy is to grow a garden ; that 's what I did when I was poor , and what 's more the food tastes a lot better than anything you can buy.Second best is the most expensive , that 's at the farmer 's market.After that is frozen ; I always thought I hated peas until I ate fresh ones , turns out it 's just canned peas I hate , frozen are almost as good as fresh.Many of the poor have the added disadvantage of having no transportation , making them spend more than they can afford on poor nutrition foods , because they 're limited to the bus line .
You ca n't buy what you cant reach .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Canning depletes many nutrients, and check the labels -- a lot of canned goods (as well as everything else) have loads of corn syrup.
The best way for the poor to eat healthy is to grow a garden; that's what I did when I was poor, and what's more the food tastes a lot better than anything you can buy.Second best is the most expensive, that's at the farmer's market.After that is frozen; I always thought I hated peas until I ate fresh ones, turns out it's just canned peas I hate, frozen are almost as good as fresh.Many of the poor have the added disadvantage of having no transportation, making them spend more than they can afford on poor nutrition foods, because they're limited to the bus line.
You can't buy what you cant reach.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656982</id>
	<title>Re:Solely focused on consuming food...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269876960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fat people have continued to eat and get fat in the face of the most horrible emotional pain to be found.  No group of people are as routinely and cruelly abused as fat people.  Obese rats eating in the face of physical pain is an unsurprising mirror to this.</p><p>The article mentions that we somehow knew this to be true.  At least, those who have struggled with their weight certainly did. Few who have faced the emotional trauma of living in modern day society as a fat person would choose to continue to do so if he had any real choice in the matter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fat people have continued to eat and get fat in the face of the most horrible emotional pain to be found .
No group of people are as routinely and cruelly abused as fat people .
Obese rats eating in the face of physical pain is an unsurprising mirror to this.The article mentions that we somehow knew this to be true .
At least , those who have struggled with their weight certainly did .
Few who have faced the emotional trauma of living in modern day society as a fat person would choose to continue to do so if he had any real choice in the matter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fat people have continued to eat and get fat in the face of the most horrible emotional pain to be found.
No group of people are as routinely and cruelly abused as fat people.
Obese rats eating in the face of physical pain is an unsurprising mirror to this.The article mentions that we somehow knew this to be true.
At least, those who have struggled with their weight certainly did.
Few who have faced the emotional trauma of living in modern day society as a fat person would choose to continue to do so if he had any real choice in the matter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656140</id>
	<title>Article Title Misleading</title>
	<author>xaerius</author>
	<datestamp>1269873120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The title of this article suggests that it is the fat in these foods that causes the addictive response, however, this study did not isolate foods as merely high-fat. The diet included many foods, such as cheesecake, which included high levels of sugar. Sugar has been found to be more addictive than cocaine on its own. It is likely that the fat+sugar combination has a synergistic addictive effect, however, anyone who has been on a low carbohydrate diet can tell you that fat on its own actually suppresses appetite and does not cause cravings.

Sugar addiction study: <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchArticle.action?articleURI=info\%3Adoi\%2F10.1371\%2Fjournal.pone.0000698" title="plosone.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchArticle.action?articleURI=info\%3Adoi\%2F10.1371\%2Fjournal.pone.0000698</a> [plosone.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The title of this article suggests that it is the fat in these foods that causes the addictive response , however , this study did not isolate foods as merely high-fat .
The diet included many foods , such as cheesecake , which included high levels of sugar .
Sugar has been found to be more addictive than cocaine on its own .
It is likely that the fat + sugar combination has a synergistic addictive effect , however , anyone who has been on a low carbohydrate diet can tell you that fat on its own actually suppresses appetite and does not cause cravings .
Sugar addiction study : http : //www.plosone.org/article/fetchArticle.action ? articleURI = info \ % 3Adoi \ % 2F10.1371 \ % 2Fjournal.pone.0000698 [ plosone.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The title of this article suggests that it is the fat in these foods that causes the addictive response, however, this study did not isolate foods as merely high-fat.
The diet included many foods, such as cheesecake, which included high levels of sugar.
Sugar has been found to be more addictive than cocaine on its own.
It is likely that the fat+sugar combination has a synergistic addictive effect, however, anyone who has been on a low carbohydrate diet can tell you that fat on its own actually suppresses appetite and does not cause cravings.
Sugar addiction study: http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchArticle.action?articleURI=info\%3Adoi\%2F10.1371\%2Fjournal.pone.0000698 [plosone.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658802</id>
	<title>Uhh...</title>
	<author>twoallbeefpatties</author>
	<datestamp>1269884580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Fat addiction is not sufficient to explain the United States obesity epidemic because fats are just as addictive in Sweden, Japan and Uruguay as they are in the United States but we only have an obesity epidemic here.</i> <br> <br>

<i> Government policy in the United States is designed to promote obesity by socializing the costs of obesity. The first cost is the food itself, which the government pays for in the forms of, to name two, food stamps and the earned income tax credit. Everyone in the United States is required, by law, to pay for food to feed fat people. Really. The second cost of obesity, greatly increased medical care, is now socialized as well. </i> <br> <br>

Uh, dude, America has the LEAST socialized health and welfare policies of the first-world nations.  I don't think you can blame socialized medicine for the obesity epidemic when we don't have universal health care like all those skinnier nations do, and we have a much weaker safety net for people who can't afford food on their own.  If you want an insight into how government policy influences food choices, you might instead want to look into farm subsidies for certain kinds of produce.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fat addiction is not sufficient to explain the United States obesity epidemic because fats are just as addictive in Sweden , Japan and Uruguay as they are in the United States but we only have an obesity epidemic here .
Government policy in the United States is designed to promote obesity by socializing the costs of obesity .
The first cost is the food itself , which the government pays for in the forms of , to name two , food stamps and the earned income tax credit .
Everyone in the United States is required , by law , to pay for food to feed fat people .
Really. The second cost of obesity , greatly increased medical care , is now socialized as well .
Uh , dude , America has the LEAST socialized health and welfare policies of the first-world nations .
I do n't think you can blame socialized medicine for the obesity epidemic when we do n't have universal health care like all those skinnier nations do , and we have a much weaker safety net for people who ca n't afford food on their own .
If you want an insight into how government policy influences food choices , you might instead want to look into farm subsidies for certain kinds of produce .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fat addiction is not sufficient to explain the United States obesity epidemic because fats are just as addictive in Sweden, Japan and Uruguay as they are in the United States but we only have an obesity epidemic here.
Government policy in the United States is designed to promote obesity by socializing the costs of obesity.
The first cost is the food itself, which the government pays for in the forms of, to name two, food stamps and the earned income tax credit.
Everyone in the United States is required, by law, to pay for food to feed fat people.
Really. The second cost of obesity, greatly increased medical care, is now socialized as well.
Uh, dude, America has the LEAST socialized health and welfare policies of the first-world nations.
I don't think you can blame socialized medicine for the obesity epidemic when we don't have universal health care like all those skinnier nations do, and we have a much weaker safety net for people who can't afford food on their own.
If you want an insight into how government policy influences food choices, you might instead want to look into farm subsidies for certain kinds of produce.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656948</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656316</id>
	<title>Headlines like that are not helping obese people</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269873960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think this is another case where the media turn something that might be good: increased understanding of how obesity works, into something bad: telling obese people that they have no control over their behaviour, fueling the "it's no my fault, I have a serious illness" justification for doing nothing to help themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this is another case where the media turn something that might be good : increased understanding of how obesity works , into something bad : telling obese people that they have no control over their behaviour , fueling the " it 's no my fault , I have a serious illness " justification for doing nothing to help themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this is another case where the media turn something that might be good: increased understanding of how obesity works, into something bad: telling obese people that they have no control over their behaviour, fueling the "it's no my fault, I have a serious illness" justification for doing nothing to help themselves.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656698</id>
	<title>Not news...Known for years....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269875520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You think the food manufacturers haven't done studies on what legal additives can cause addictions?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You think the food manufacturers have n't done studies on what legal additives can cause addictions ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You think the food manufacturers haven't done studies on what legal additives can cause addictions?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655994</id>
	<title>Cocaine may cause fatty food-like addiction</title>
	<author>mbone</author>
	<datestamp>1269872340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There, CNN, fixed your headline for you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There , CNN , fixed your headline for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There, CNN, fixed your headline for you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656108</id>
	<title>Fas is fat</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269872940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As long as you fit within mammals' metabolism (maybe also the Chordate's), the more fats you eat, the fatter you become.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as you fit within mammals ' metabolism ( maybe also the Chordate 's ) , the more fats you eat , the fatter you become .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as you fit within mammals' metabolism (maybe also the Chordate's), the more fats you eat, the fatter you become.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655970</id>
	<title>Solely focused on consuming food...</title>
	<author>plasticsquirrel</author>
	<datestamp>1269872160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the article:<blockquote><div><p>They began to eat compulsively, to the point where they continued to do so in the face of pain. When the researchers applied an electric shock to the rats' feet in the presence of the food, the rats in the first two groups were frightened away from eating. But the obese rats were not. "Their attention was solely focused on consuming food," says Kenny.</p></div></blockquote><p>Assuming that rats and humans are somewhat similar in their responses, this paints a really sickening and embarrassing picture of fat people. Although they are harmed physically by their obesity, they continue at their own detriment. Maybe they really are like the obese rats who continue to eat food in the face of physical pain, when the healthier rats have been scared away.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article : They began to eat compulsively , to the point where they continued to do so in the face of pain .
When the researchers applied an electric shock to the rats ' feet in the presence of the food , the rats in the first two groups were frightened away from eating .
But the obese rats were not .
" Their attention was solely focused on consuming food , " says Kenny.Assuming that rats and humans are somewhat similar in their responses , this paints a really sickening and embarrassing picture of fat people .
Although they are harmed physically by their obesity , they continue at their own detriment .
Maybe they really are like the obese rats who continue to eat food in the face of physical pain , when the healthier rats have been scared away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article:They began to eat compulsively, to the point where they continued to do so in the face of pain.
When the researchers applied an electric shock to the rats' feet in the presence of the food, the rats in the first two groups were frightened away from eating.
But the obese rats were not.
"Their attention was solely focused on consuming food," says Kenny.Assuming that rats and humans are somewhat similar in their responses, this paints a really sickening and embarrassing picture of fat people.
Although they are harmed physically by their obesity, they continue at their own detriment.
Maybe they really are like the obese rats who continue to eat food in the face of physical pain, when the healthier rats have been scared away.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656198</id>
	<title>I can't compare...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269873480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>But eating junk food produces a high, a euphoric feeling sometimes.  I suppose that's why some foods are called "comfort food".
<br> <br>
I can't compare to drug addiction, because I've never experienced that, but a high is definitely present.
<br> <br>
Sometimes, with my tinfoil hat on, I've wondered if Taco Bell was slipping something addictive into the food that makes me keep coming back.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But eating junk food produces a high , a euphoric feeling sometimes .
I suppose that 's why some foods are called " comfort food " .
I ca n't compare to drug addiction , because I 've never experienced that , but a high is definitely present .
Sometimes , with my tinfoil hat on , I 've wondered if Taco Bell was slipping something addictive into the food that makes me keep coming back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But eating junk food produces a high, a euphoric feeling sometimes.
I suppose that's why some foods are called "comfort food".
I can't compare to drug addiction, because I've never experienced that, but a high is definitely present.
Sometimes, with my tinfoil hat on, I've wondered if Taco Bell was slipping something addictive into the food that makes me keep coming back.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657850</id>
	<title>Re:Funny...</title>
	<author>digitalhermit</author>
	<datestamp>1269880200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Funny, I lost 40 lbs eating high-fat low-carb food, purposely not exercising, and eating whenever I was hungry.</i></p><p>Well done...<br>I lost 30lbs through a combination of diet and exercise. I'm still fighting the blood pressure problem though. This year I resolved to reduce sodium intake.</p><p>I do notice that I no longer crave things I did before. For example, I used to enjoy a caramel macchiato and a bacon/egg/cheese biscuit in the morning. I'd eat those, plus a bagel loaded with cream cheese. My average lunch bill was about $25/day often for fatty skirt steaks with lots of sides or meals like the "bandeja paisa", which is essentially 3 lbs of assorted meat, some rice, and a couple fried eggs.  Add to this about 10 cups of coffee every day with *at minimum* 6 teaspoons of sugar in each and it amazes me that I didn't weigh more than the 230lbs at my heaviest.</p><p>I also noticed is that fatty foods tend to keep me satisfied longer.  Not *fried fat*, mind you, as in pieces of bacon, but fat that some people tend to cut away before cooking.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny , I lost 40 lbs eating high-fat low-carb food , purposely not exercising , and eating whenever I was hungry.Well done...I lost 30lbs through a combination of diet and exercise .
I 'm still fighting the blood pressure problem though .
This year I resolved to reduce sodium intake.I do notice that I no longer crave things I did before .
For example , I used to enjoy a caramel macchiato and a bacon/egg/cheese biscuit in the morning .
I 'd eat those , plus a bagel loaded with cream cheese .
My average lunch bill was about $ 25/day often for fatty skirt steaks with lots of sides or meals like the " bandeja paisa " , which is essentially 3 lbs of assorted meat , some rice , and a couple fried eggs .
Add to this about 10 cups of coffee every day with * at minimum * 6 teaspoons of sugar in each and it amazes me that I did n't weigh more than the 230lbs at my heaviest.I also noticed is that fatty foods tend to keep me satisfied longer .
Not * fried fat * , mind you , as in pieces of bacon , but fat that some people tend to cut away before cooking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny, I lost 40 lbs eating high-fat low-carb food, purposely not exercising, and eating whenever I was hungry.Well done...I lost 30lbs through a combination of diet and exercise.
I'm still fighting the blood pressure problem though.
This year I resolved to reduce sodium intake.I do notice that I no longer crave things I did before.
For example, I used to enjoy a caramel macchiato and a bacon/egg/cheese biscuit in the morning.
I'd eat those, plus a bagel loaded with cream cheese.
My average lunch bill was about $25/day often for fatty skirt steaks with lots of sides or meals like the "bandeja paisa", which is essentially 3 lbs of assorted meat, some rice, and a couple fried eggs.
Add to this about 10 cups of coffee every day with *at minimum* 6 teaspoons of sugar in each and it amazes me that I didn't weigh more than the 230lbs at my heaviest.I also noticed is that fatty foods tend to keep me satisfied longer.
Not *fried fat*, mind you, as in pieces of bacon, but fat that some people tend to cut away before cooking.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31660826</id>
	<title>Article is misleading. Only worry about sugars !</title>
	<author>shiphen</author>
	<datestamp>1269893460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This article fails to distinguish between fats and fast-burn carbohydrates.</p><p>There is much evidence that fast burn carbs are addictive due to the way that they cause boom-bust cycles of glucose levels. At peak glucose levels the body frantically tries to take glucose out of the blood stream and store it (ultimately as fat).  It does this by dumping large quantities of insulin into the blood. The problem is that when the supply of glucose has dried up, the insulin is still there, and this causes a glucose crash, and intense hunger/food cravings. Boom bust causes you to eat too much and makes you fat. It only takes a few grams of sugar to have this effect. The powerful sugar lobby do not want you to know this.</p><p>But the effect of fat is less clear.</p><p>Fat have had an unfairly bad press. Granted some types of fat are moderately bad for you, and granted that when mixed with sugars, they make it easier to eat far too many calories.</p><p>However it is not clear that fats in themselves are in any way bad for your. Whereas sugars are the real enemy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This article fails to distinguish between fats and fast-burn carbohydrates.There is much evidence that fast burn carbs are addictive due to the way that they cause boom-bust cycles of glucose levels .
At peak glucose levels the body frantically tries to take glucose out of the blood stream and store it ( ultimately as fat ) .
It does this by dumping large quantities of insulin into the blood .
The problem is that when the supply of glucose has dried up , the insulin is still there , and this causes a glucose crash , and intense hunger/food cravings .
Boom bust causes you to eat too much and makes you fat .
It only takes a few grams of sugar to have this effect .
The powerful sugar lobby do not want you to know this.But the effect of fat is less clear.Fat have had an unfairly bad press .
Granted some types of fat are moderately bad for you , and granted that when mixed with sugars , they make it easier to eat far too many calories.However it is not clear that fats in themselves are in any way bad for your .
Whereas sugars are the real enemy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This article fails to distinguish between fats and fast-burn carbohydrates.There is much evidence that fast burn carbs are addictive due to the way that they cause boom-bust cycles of glucose levels.
At peak glucose levels the body frantically tries to take glucose out of the blood stream and store it (ultimately as fat).
It does this by dumping large quantities of insulin into the blood.
The problem is that when the supply of glucose has dried up, the insulin is still there, and this causes a glucose crash, and intense hunger/food cravings.
Boom bust causes you to eat too much and makes you fat.
It only takes a few grams of sugar to have this effect.
The powerful sugar lobby do not want you to know this.But the effect of fat is less clear.Fat have had an unfairly bad press.
Granted some types of fat are moderately bad for you, and granted that when mixed with sugars, they make it easier to eat far too many calories.However it is not clear that fats in themselves are in any way bad for your.
Whereas sugars are the real enemy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656070</id>
	<title>Funny...</title>
	<author>brian0918</author>
	<datestamp>1269872820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Funny, I lost 40 lbs eating high-fat low-carb food, purposely not exercising, and eating whenever I was hungry. And my blood pressure went down to normal from its high of 145/95, so I could stop taking blood pressure medication as well. I'm healthier than I've ever been.
<br> <br>
Of course, unlike these rats, I did not eat cheesecake, frosting or other foods high in refined carbs. But this POS study doesn't bother to differentiate between high-fat/high-carb, high-fat/low-carb, etc, let alone about the balance or type of fatty acids present in the food (e.g. grass-fed bacon vs. grain-fed). This is not science, not even close.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny , I lost 40 lbs eating high-fat low-carb food , purposely not exercising , and eating whenever I was hungry .
And my blood pressure went down to normal from its high of 145/95 , so I could stop taking blood pressure medication as well .
I 'm healthier than I 've ever been .
Of course , unlike these rats , I did not eat cheesecake , frosting or other foods high in refined carbs .
But this POS study does n't bother to differentiate between high-fat/high-carb , high-fat/low-carb , etc , let alone about the balance or type of fatty acids present in the food ( e.g .
grass-fed bacon vs. grain-fed ) . This is not science , not even close .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny, I lost 40 lbs eating high-fat low-carb food, purposely not exercising, and eating whenever I was hungry.
And my blood pressure went down to normal from its high of 145/95, so I could stop taking blood pressure medication as well.
I'm healthier than I've ever been.
Of course, unlike these rats, I did not eat cheesecake, frosting or other foods high in refined carbs.
But this POS study doesn't bother to differentiate between high-fat/high-carb, high-fat/low-carb, etc, let alone about the balance or type of fatty acids present in the food (e.g.
grass-fed bacon vs. grain-fed). This is not science, not even close.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657414</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, I can see that...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269878580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The issue is actually with the lack of decent grocery stores in poorer neighborhoods; if you can only practically shop at fast-food restaurants and convenience stores then healthy food, even if it is affordable, is not available to you.  It is something that h</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The issue is actually with the lack of decent grocery stores in poorer neighborhoods ; if you can only practically shop at fast-food restaurants and convenience stores then healthy food , even if it is affordable , is not available to you .
It is something that h</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The issue is actually with the lack of decent grocery stores in poorer neighborhoods; if you can only practically shop at fast-food restaurants and convenience stores then healthy food, even if it is affordable, is not available to you.
It is something that h</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656120</id>
	<title>Duh. Biologically We've Still In The Savannah.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269873060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Millions of years of evolution makes animals crave high calorie fatty food and eat as much of it as possible, because they never know when they're going to get the opportunity to do so again. Human beings are no different.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Millions of years of evolution makes animals crave high calorie fatty food and eat as much of it as possible , because they never know when they 're going to get the opportunity to do so again .
Human beings are no different .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Millions of years of evolution makes animals crave high calorie fatty food and eat as much of it as possible, because they never know when they're going to get the opportunity to do so again.
Human beings are no different.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656650</id>
	<title>But it's videogames fault...</title>
	<author>Plastic Pencil</author>
	<datestamp>1269875340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...or is it, the TV, or maybe too much twitter?
<br>
<br>
C'mon everyone, ignore further evidence that eating a steady diet and creating a 'food supply' in highly processed junk, loaded with sugar, HFC, and fat, and all sorts of random chemicals has nothing to do with obesity spreading at epidemic-like levels.  "Whole Wheat" bread with HFC?  Sounds deliciously appropriate.
<br>
<br>
Let's just debate and debate and debate.  That way everything gets solved and everyone wins (the right to enjoy their ignorance!).
<br>
<br>
It's your right to get addicted and stay addicted from an early age until premature death.
<br>
<br>
 The infinite wisdom you're born with will only guide you perfectly in every decision throughout your entire life.  No need to worry.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...or is it , the TV , or maybe too much twitter ?
C'mon everyone , ignore further evidence that eating a steady diet and creating a 'food supply ' in highly processed junk , loaded with sugar , HFC , and fat , and all sorts of random chemicals has nothing to do with obesity spreading at epidemic-like levels .
" Whole Wheat " bread with HFC ?
Sounds deliciously appropriate .
Let 's just debate and debate and debate .
That way everything gets solved and everyone wins ( the right to enjoy their ignorance ! ) .
It 's your right to get addicted and stay addicted from an early age until premature death .
The infinite wisdom you 're born with will only guide you perfectly in every decision throughout your entire life .
No need to worry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...or is it, the TV, or maybe too much twitter?
C'mon everyone, ignore further evidence that eating a steady diet and creating a 'food supply' in highly processed junk, loaded with sugar, HFC, and fat, and all sorts of random chemicals has nothing to do with obesity spreading at epidemic-like levels.
"Whole Wheat" bread with HFC?
Sounds deliciously appropriate.
Let's just debate and debate and debate.
That way everything gets solved and everyone wins (the right to enjoy their ignorance!).
It's your right to get addicted and stay addicted from an early age until premature death.
The infinite wisdom you're born with will only guide you perfectly in every decision throughout your entire life.
No need to worry.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657818</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, I can see that...</title>
	<author>LordLucless</author>
	<datestamp>1269880080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The one thing about these foods that I don't agree with is that the poor need to eat them because they can't afford food that is good for them. That's a load of rubbish.</p> </div><p>It's not because they're cheap. It's because they're cheap <strong>and</strong> easy. Poorer people generally need to work longer hourers to earn enough to get by. If they're part of a family, then both parents generally need to work in order to support it. It's hard to come home after ten hours on the job to face preparing and cooking a fresh meal.</p><p>Also, canned vegetables are generally artificially sweetened.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The one thing about these foods that I do n't agree with is that the poor need to eat them because they ca n't afford food that is good for them .
That 's a load of rubbish .
It 's not because they 're cheap .
It 's because they 're cheap and easy .
Poorer people generally need to work longer hourers to earn enough to get by .
If they 're part of a family , then both parents generally need to work in order to support it .
It 's hard to come home after ten hours on the job to face preparing and cooking a fresh meal.Also , canned vegetables are generally artificially sweetened .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The one thing about these foods that I don't agree with is that the poor need to eat them because they can't afford food that is good for them.
That's a load of rubbish.
It's not because they're cheap.
It's because they're cheap and easy.
Poorer people generally need to work longer hourers to earn enough to get by.
If they're part of a family, then both parents generally need to work in order to support it.
It's hard to come home after ten hours on the job to face preparing and cooking a fresh meal.Also, canned vegetables are generally artificially sweetened.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656874</id>
	<title>Fat fact</title>
	<author>NicknamesAreStupid</author>
	<datestamp>1269876420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If everyone in America suddenly starting eating a diet that would maintain their BMI at 23, most of the food industry would go bankrupt in six months.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If everyone in America suddenly starting eating a diet that would maintain their BMI at 23 , most of the food industry would go bankrupt in six months .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If everyone in America suddenly starting eating a diet that would maintain their BMI at 23, most of the food industry would go bankrupt in six months.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656364</id>
	<title>No study needed to show this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269874140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All these folks had to do was walk around where I work.  If you look at those who are obese, you will also find their drawers stuffed with all kinds of boxed goodies, usually chips and the like.</p><p>These are the same people who also refuse to walk up one flight of stairs so the two go hand-in-hand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All these folks had to do was walk around where I work .
If you look at those who are obese , you will also find their drawers stuffed with all kinds of boxed goodies , usually chips and the like.These are the same people who also refuse to walk up one flight of stairs so the two go hand-in-hand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All these folks had to do was walk around where I work.
If you look at those who are obese, you will also find their drawers stuffed with all kinds of boxed goodies, usually chips and the like.These are the same people who also refuse to walk up one flight of stairs so the two go hand-in-hand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656932</id>
	<title>Balance is important</title>
	<author>rcharbon</author>
	<datestamp>1269876660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You need to balance your choices to achieve moderation.  Eat the fatty, sugary stuff, but then take the cocaine to burn off the calories.  Soon you'll reach your ideal weight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You need to balance your choices to achieve moderation .
Eat the fatty , sugary stuff , but then take the cocaine to burn off the calories .
Soon you 'll reach your ideal weight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You need to balance your choices to achieve moderation.
Eat the fatty, sugary stuff, but then take the cocaine to burn off the calories.
Soon you'll reach your ideal weight.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657012</id>
	<title>Re:Now the question regards addiction strength.</title>
	<author>Urza9814</author>
	<datestamp>1269877080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, cocaine is less addictive than nicotine...but still pretty addictive:<br><a href="http://www.saferchoice.org/safercolorado06/images/clip\_image003.gif" title="saferchoice.org">http://www.saferchoice.org/safercolorado06/images/clip\_image003.gif</a> [saferchoice.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , cocaine is less addictive than nicotine...but still pretty addictive : http : //www.saferchoice.org/safercolorado06/images/clip \ _image003.gif [ saferchoice.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, cocaine is less addictive than nicotine...but still pretty addictive:http://www.saferchoice.org/safercolorado06/images/clip\_image003.gif [saferchoice.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31661210</id>
	<title>Re:I can't compare...</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1269895260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>But eating junk food produces a high, a euphoric feeling sometimes.</i> </p><p>I'm sorry, but what the <b>fuck</b> are you talking about?  I've never, EVER had this experience in my entire life, and I've had some pretty transcendent meals.  I think, sir, you have gone outside the bounds of shared experience.  "Comfort food", though a denigrating, dehumanizing term, means foods with which you were familiar as a youth.  Has nothing to do with getting a "high" from Twinkies, lardass.  Honestly, at this point, I would really recommend trying drugs.  They're much, much better than a Ding-Dong or Bucket-O-Lard or whatever the fuck makes you Republitards happy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But eating junk food produces a high , a euphoric feeling sometimes .
I 'm sorry , but what the fuck are you talking about ?
I 've never , EVER had this experience in my entire life , and I 've had some pretty transcendent meals .
I think , sir , you have gone outside the bounds of shared experience .
" Comfort food " , though a denigrating , dehumanizing term , means foods with which you were familiar as a youth .
Has nothing to do with getting a " high " from Twinkies , lardass .
Honestly , at this point , I would really recommend trying drugs .
They 're much , much better than a Ding-Dong or Bucket-O-Lard or whatever the fuck makes you Republitards happy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> But eating junk food produces a high, a euphoric feeling sometimes.
I'm sorry, but what the fuck are you talking about?
I've never, EVER had this experience in my entire life, and I've had some pretty transcendent meals.
I think, sir, you have gone outside the bounds of shared experience.
"Comfort food", though a denigrating, dehumanizing term, means foods with which you were familiar as a youth.
Has nothing to do with getting a "high" from Twinkies, lardass.
Honestly, at this point, I would really recommend trying drugs.
They're much, much better than a Ding-Dong or Bucket-O-Lard or whatever the fuck makes you Republitards happy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656164</id>
	<title>Your just pissed because fat people live longer.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269873240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You just can't decide between looking "socially acceptable" and living longer.  So you are pissed.</p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/07/health/07fat.html?ex=1352091600&amp;en=df140405014189b6&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss" title="nytimes.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/07/health/07fat.html?ex=1352091600&amp;en=df140405014189b6&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss</a> [nytimes.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You just ca n't decide between looking " socially acceptable " and living longer .
So you are pissed.http : //www.nytimes.com/2007/11/07/health/07fat.html ? ex = 1352091600&amp;en = df140405014189b6&amp;ei = 5090&amp;partner = rssuserland&amp;emc = rss [ nytimes.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You just can't decide between looking "socially acceptable" and living longer.
So you are pissed.http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/07/health/07fat.html?ex=1352091600&amp;en=df140405014189b6&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss [nytimes.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31660704</id>
	<title>Re:Now the question regards addiction strength.</title>
	<author>the\_womble</author>
	<datestamp>1269892980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Also, I wonder if this study holds true for various other pleasurable inputs</p></div><p>Please do not say that to any politicians, or they will see it as an excuse to ban everything from sex to reading because it is addictive, and is obviously just as bad as heroin.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , I wonder if this study holds true for various other pleasurable inputsPlease do not say that to any politicians , or they will see it as an excuse to ban everything from sex to reading because it is addictive , and is obviously just as bad as heroin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, I wonder if this study holds true for various other pleasurable inputsPlease do not say that to any politicians, or they will see it as an excuse to ban everything from sex to reading because it is addictive, and is obviously just as bad as heroin.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655966</id>
	<title>Quick, start another government agency!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269872160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We need a DEA-like arm of the government to enforce state-approved dietary behaviors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We need a DEA-like arm of the government to enforce state-approved dietary behaviors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We need a DEA-like arm of the government to enforce state-approved dietary behaviors.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656524</id>
	<title>If it's like cocaine</title>
	<author>arndawg</author>
	<datestamp>1269874920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Obviously we should start a war on fatty foods. And we all know it's bad for your health.

Slingin KFC on the corners of compton.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously we should start a war on fatty foods .
And we all know it 's bad for your health .
Slingin KFC on the corners of compton .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously we should start a war on fatty foods.
And we all know it's bad for your health.
Slingin KFC on the corners of compton.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656314</id>
	<title>Simple</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269873960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Simple way to fix this addiction... Lets outlaw food in America after all it is a gateway drug... People are dying from being obese, and obviously they are getting high from it, and we do not like anything that gives anyone else but ourselves pleasure. Support outlawing food!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Simple way to fix this addiction... Lets outlaw food in America after all it is a gateway drug... People are dying from being obese , and obviously they are getting high from it , and we do not like anything that gives anyone else but ourselves pleasure .
Support outlawing food ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Simple way to fix this addiction... Lets outlaw food in America after all it is a gateway drug... People are dying from being obese, and obviously they are getting high from it, and we do not like anything that gives anyone else but ourselves pleasure.
Support outlawing food!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658000</id>
	<title>Re:Human food</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269880980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I used to think that being a rat was a bad think, now think about it. Humans have developed a whole bunch medicines and cures for diseases that rats may suffer from, and NOW on top of that... the get to get drugs (and seems to be legal for them!).</p><p>So go figure, rats get to be more free and healthy than some humans.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to think that being a rat was a bad think , now think about it .
Humans have developed a whole bunch medicines and cures for diseases that rats may suffer from , and NOW on top of that... the get to get drugs ( and seems to be legal for them !
) .So go figure , rats get to be more free and healthy than some humans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to think that being a rat was a bad think, now think about it.
Humans have developed a whole bunch medicines and cures for diseases that rats may suffer from, and NOW on top of that... the get to get drugs (and seems to be legal for them!
).So go figure, rats get to be more free and healthy than some humans.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656228</id>
	<title>In other news....</title>
	<author>Xenious</author>
	<datestamp>1269873600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People want to eat food that is tasty....film at 11.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People want to eat food that is tasty....film at 11 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People want to eat food that is tasty....film at 11.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655946</id>
	<title>Now the question regards addiction strength.</title>
	<author>Spazntwich</author>
	<datestamp>1269872040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does this mean fatty food is "that" addictive, or does this perhaps mean cocaine isn't that addictive? Though I suppose the mere notion of shades of "addictiveness" can be dishonest itself, considering the binary nature of addiction (you either are, or you aren't, and exhibit a different set of behaviors based on that).</p><p>Also, I wonder if this study holds true for various other pleasurable inputs. As far as anyone knows, cocaine acts by causing direct stimulation of the reward center, a property shared by (as far as I know) any behavior the brain seeks to reinforce, including eating energy dense foods, so I wonder if things like bathing and receiving affection could also demonstrate similar "cocaine-like addictions," witness OCD handwashing and narcissism.</p><p>Seems like the scientists continue to find supporting evidence for the brilliant motto, "Everything in moderation. Including moderation." Except probably cocaine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean fatty food is " that " addictive , or does this perhaps mean cocaine is n't that addictive ?
Though I suppose the mere notion of shades of " addictiveness " can be dishonest itself , considering the binary nature of addiction ( you either are , or you are n't , and exhibit a different set of behaviors based on that ) .Also , I wonder if this study holds true for various other pleasurable inputs .
As far as anyone knows , cocaine acts by causing direct stimulation of the reward center , a property shared by ( as far as I know ) any behavior the brain seeks to reinforce , including eating energy dense foods , so I wonder if things like bathing and receiving affection could also demonstrate similar " cocaine-like addictions , " witness OCD handwashing and narcissism.Seems like the scientists continue to find supporting evidence for the brilliant motto , " Everything in moderation .
Including moderation .
" Except probably cocaine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean fatty food is "that" addictive, or does this perhaps mean cocaine isn't that addictive?
Though I suppose the mere notion of shades of "addictiveness" can be dishonest itself, considering the binary nature of addiction (you either are, or you aren't, and exhibit a different set of behaviors based on that).Also, I wonder if this study holds true for various other pleasurable inputs.
As far as anyone knows, cocaine acts by causing direct stimulation of the reward center, a property shared by (as far as I know) any behavior the brain seeks to reinforce, including eating energy dense foods, so I wonder if things like bathing and receiving affection could also demonstrate similar "cocaine-like addictions," witness OCD handwashing and narcissism.Seems like the scientists continue to find supporting evidence for the brilliant motto, "Everything in moderation.
Including moderation.
" Except probably cocaine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31668556</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, I can see that...</title>
	<author>drsquare</author>
	<datestamp>1269952680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't that an issue of demand? In most countries poor areas are full of greengrocers and markets selling cheap fruit and veg. Shops, especially the chains, are normally pretty in tune with what people want to buy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't that an issue of demand ?
In most countries poor areas are full of greengrocers and markets selling cheap fruit and veg .
Shops , especially the chains , are normally pretty in tune with what people want to buy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't that an issue of demand?
In most countries poor areas are full of greengrocers and markets selling cheap fruit and veg.
Shops, especially the chains, are normally pretty in tune with what people want to buy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31659080</id>
	<title>Re:Headlines like that are not helping obese peopl</title>
	<author>digitaldrunkenmonk</author>
	<datestamp>1269885780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not really. The CNN article is basically a more approachable summary of the Nature article with some insight from the scientists involved. All the article says is that fattening food is addictive, and that, as a result, some of the same techniques used to get people away from narcotic addiction could be used here.

Much in the same way that a narcotic addiction isn't easy to get away from, an eating disorder is not either. The problem arises when people downplay the difficulty involved to a triviality.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not really .
The CNN article is basically a more approachable summary of the Nature article with some insight from the scientists involved .
All the article says is that fattening food is addictive , and that , as a result , some of the same techniques used to get people away from narcotic addiction could be used here .
Much in the same way that a narcotic addiction is n't easy to get away from , an eating disorder is not either .
The problem arises when people downplay the difficulty involved to a triviality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not really.
The CNN article is basically a more approachable summary of the Nature article with some insight from the scientists involved.
All the article says is that fattening food is addictive, and that, as a result, some of the same techniques used to get people away from narcotic addiction could be used here.
Much in the same way that a narcotic addiction isn't easy to get away from, an eating disorder is not either.
The problem arises when people downplay the difficulty involved to a triviality.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656602</id>
	<title>Re:OK, so now...</title>
	<author>jellomizer</author>
	<datestamp>1269875160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With the exception of course is the fact that people need food to survive.  You don't need drugs.  It is hard to quit doing something that you need to do to survive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With the exception of course is the fact that people need food to survive .
You do n't need drugs .
It is hard to quit doing something that you need to do to survive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With the exception of course is the fact that people need food to survive.
You don't need drugs.
It is hard to quit doing something that you need to do to survive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656172</id>
	<title>Super Size Me...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269873300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the Documentary Super Size Me, several Doctor's noted the same behavior and stated that Fatty Foods found in Fast Food restaurants (McDonald's in this example) were equal to cocaine in terms of addiction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the Documentary Super Size Me , several Doctor 's noted the same behavior and stated that Fatty Foods found in Fast Food restaurants ( McDonald 's in this example ) were equal to cocaine in terms of addiction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the Documentary Super Size Me, several Doctor's noted the same behavior and stated that Fatty Foods found in Fast Food restaurants (McDonald's in this example) were equal to cocaine in terms of addiction.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656402</id>
	<title>Addiction to Facebook/Twitter Too?</title>
	<author>mim</author>
	<datestamp>1269874320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is there really a cure for *anything* that's addictive for "everyone"? (pls note the links at the end of the article) <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/03/28/fatty.foods.brain/" title="cnn.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/03/28/fatty.foods.brain/</a> [cnn.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there really a cure for * anything * that 's addictive for " everyone " ?
( pls note the links at the end of the article ) http : //www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/03/28/fatty.foods.brain/ [ cnn.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there really a cure for *anything* that's addictive for "everyone"?
(pls note the links at the end of the article) http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/03/28/fatty.foods.brain/ [cnn.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658018</id>
	<title>Re:Funny...</title>
	<author>Marx\_Mrvelous</author>
	<datestamp>1269881040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can also lose a lot of weight on the cocaine diet, but it, like Atkins, is also not healthy in the long run.

But hey, I'm sure your peer-reviewed paper on fatty acids puts the whole debate to rest, right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can also lose a lot of weight on the cocaine diet , but it , like Atkins , is also not healthy in the long run .
But hey , I 'm sure your peer-reviewed paper on fatty acids puts the whole debate to rest , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can also lose a lot of weight on the cocaine diet, but it, like Atkins, is also not healthy in the long run.
But hey, I'm sure your peer-reviewed paper on fatty acids puts the whole debate to rest, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31667154</id>
	<title>I knew it!</title>
	<author>aldld</author>
	<datestamp>1269891420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That episode of <i>The Simpsons</i> was right!</htmltext>
<tokenext>That episode of The Simpsons was right !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That episode of The Simpsons was right!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31659474</id>
	<title>Re:Funny...</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1269887280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And from TFA, it looked to me like the affected rats were also on a diet with not enough protein, which will ALSO make you munchy. As will, eventually, any diet that is deficient in basic nutrients -- after a certain point the body starts to act like it just can't get enough and you eat everything in sight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And from TFA , it looked to me like the affected rats were also on a diet with not enough protein , which will ALSO make you munchy .
As will , eventually , any diet that is deficient in basic nutrients -- after a certain point the body starts to act like it just ca n't get enough and you eat everything in sight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And from TFA, it looked to me like the affected rats were also on a diet with not enough protein, which will ALSO make you munchy.
As will, eventually, any diet that is deficient in basic nutrients -- after a certain point the body starts to act like it just can't get enough and you eat everything in sight.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657206</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, I can see that...</title>
	<author>kcbnac</author>
	<datestamp>1269877920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The key words in your entire statement, are the last three:</p><p>"...if you try."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The key words in your entire statement , are the last three : " ...if you try .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The key words in your entire statement, are the last three:"...if you try.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31659274</id>
	<title>Then you ain;t addicted</title>
	<author>SmallFurryCreature</author>
	<datestamp>1269886560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I worked with drug addicts. There is no will power. Will you lick the sidewalk were someone spilled a morsel of cheeseburger? Eat a cheeseburger covered in human blood? Eat a burger made of ground glass?
</p><p>I think the whole article is silly. You want to see real addiction? Air. Go ahead. Quit it. See how long you can go cold turkey. Hello scientists, fatty food is what we evolved to eat. It allows us to fuel our brain. And we got a huge brain because we don't eat vegetables but tasty juicy animals.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I worked with drug addicts .
There is no will power .
Will you lick the sidewalk were someone spilled a morsel of cheeseburger ?
Eat a cheeseburger covered in human blood ?
Eat a burger made of ground glass ?
I think the whole article is silly .
You want to see real addiction ?
Air. Go ahead .
Quit it .
See how long you can go cold turkey .
Hello scientists , fatty food is what we evolved to eat .
It allows us to fuel our brain .
And we got a huge brain because we do n't eat vegetables but tasty juicy animals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I worked with drug addicts.
There is no will power.
Will you lick the sidewalk were someone spilled a morsel of cheeseburger?
Eat a cheeseburger covered in human blood?
Eat a burger made of ground glass?
I think the whole article is silly.
You want to see real addiction?
Air. Go ahead.
Quit it.
See how long you can go cold turkey.
Hello scientists, fatty food is what we evolved to eat.
It allows us to fuel our brain.
And we got a huge brain because we don't eat vegetables but tasty juicy animals.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31684566</id>
	<title>Re:Solely focused on consuming food...</title>
	<author>SoupIsGoodFood\_42</author>
	<datestamp>1270029420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is it sickening and embarrassing? I don't understand the idea that I should be sickened about someone's weight problem, which at the end of the day, is more like a software glitch. Not to mention you can't really compare a lab rat to a non-lab human in that way. Perhaps I'm wrong, but your post sounds like more anti-obesity BS. Why are people with obesity problems OK targets for BS that we wouldn't otherwise tolerate?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is it sickening and embarrassing ?
I do n't understand the idea that I should be sickened about someone 's weight problem , which at the end of the day , is more like a software glitch .
Not to mention you ca n't really compare a lab rat to a non-lab human in that way .
Perhaps I 'm wrong , but your post sounds like more anti-obesity BS .
Why are people with obesity problems OK targets for BS that we would n't otherwise tolerate ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is it sickening and embarrassing?
I don't understand the idea that I should be sickened about someone's weight problem, which at the end of the day, is more like a software glitch.
Not to mention you can't really compare a lab rat to a non-lab human in that way.
Perhaps I'm wrong, but your post sounds like more anti-obesity BS.
Why are people with obesity problems OK targets for BS that we wouldn't otherwise tolerate?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656732</id>
	<title>Re:Funny...</title>
	<author>dasunt</author>
	<datestamp>1269875760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Funny, I lost 40 lbs eating high-fat low-carb food, purposely not exercising, and eating whenever I was hungry. And my blood pressure went down to normal from its high of 145/95, so I could stop taking blood pressure medication as well. I'm healthier than I've ever been.</p></div></blockquote><p>
"Purposely not exercising"?
</p><p>
Why would you do that?
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny , I lost 40 lbs eating high-fat low-carb food , purposely not exercising , and eating whenever I was hungry .
And my blood pressure went down to normal from its high of 145/95 , so I could stop taking blood pressure medication as well .
I 'm healthier than I 've ever been .
" Purposely not exercising " ?
Why would you do that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny, I lost 40 lbs eating high-fat low-carb food, purposely not exercising, and eating whenever I was hungry.
And my blood pressure went down to normal from its high of 145/95, so I could stop taking blood pressure medication as well.
I'm healthier than I've ever been.
"Purposely not exercising"?
Why would you do that?

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656532</id>
	<title>Re:OK, so now...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269874920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then I guess we're even because I've got about as much respect for stupid asses as I do for idiots.  From a fat guy to a stupid ass...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then I guess we 're even because I 've got about as much respect for stupid asses as I do for idiots .
From a fat guy to a stupid ass.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then I guess we're even because I've got about as much respect for stupid asses as I do for idiots.
From a fat guy to a stupid ass...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658536</id>
	<title>Re:Fat fact</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1269883200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The whole thing? What would we eat?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The whole thing ?
What would we eat ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The whole thing?
What would we eat?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656874</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656450</id>
	<title>Re:Now the question regards addiction strength.</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1269874560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Also, I wonder if this study holds true for various other pleasurable inputs. </i></p><p>Yes.  All this research shows is that pleasurable stimuli are reinforcing.  Fatty foods activate reward pathways in the same way cocaine does.  But so does sex, gambling, shopping, video games, etc.  Choose your poison.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , I wonder if this study holds true for various other pleasurable inputs .
Yes. All this research shows is that pleasurable stimuli are reinforcing .
Fatty foods activate reward pathways in the same way cocaine does .
But so does sex , gambling , shopping , video games , etc .
Choose your poison .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, I wonder if this study holds true for various other pleasurable inputs.
Yes.  All this research shows is that pleasurable stimuli are reinforcing.
Fatty foods activate reward pathways in the same way cocaine does.
But so does sex, gambling, shopping, video games, etc.
Choose your poison.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31666848</id>
	<title>Re:Funny...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1269887820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You&rsquo;re not the only one. Two friends of mine had the same experience. Little to no short carbohydrates (long ones are ok), no denatured (=heated) animal proteins, and not only did they eat lots of vegetables, fruits and nuts, but literally shitloads of fat. They had no compunction drinking olive oil straight from the bottle! (Well, I thought that was disgusting and wouldn&rsquo;t go that far. But it&rsquo;s obviously not something disgusting per se.)</p><p>They lost more weight than they could compensate with eating and body building.</p><p>Another thing that most people forget, is that short carbohydrates deprive the body of B vitamins, which usually come with the carbohydrates when it&rsquo;s wholemeal. So you get a vitamin B deficiency. One result, other than that it&rsquo;s obviously bad for your whole body, is that your brain essentially needs them. So in essence, those sugars also make you dumb. Which perhaps explains why people seem to get dumber and dumber.<br>And after being processed, you got loads of energy in your blood stream in a matter of minutes, but your cells can never need that much that quickly. So since the sugars damage your blood vessels, they must be moved out, transformed into fat, and stored in your fat cells for later.<br>But then, your stomach is empty, and your blood too. So after another couple of minutes, there in no energy left for any further actions.<br>This is a problem, since your body does not like giving up his fat cells. If you can get food without your body doing that work, it prefers that. So... you get hungry again. Perhaps even worse than before. It&rsquo;s a vicious cycle that may remind you of something... *nudge*nudge* drug addiction *nudge*nudge*</p><p>Of course the obvious fix would be, is to go hungry long enough, to use the energy up... if you can... haha.<br>But now the worst thing: That wouldn&rsquo;t even use up any fat cells for the first two weeks. Since your body switches to an emergency metabolism, where it takes the energy out of essential organs, like your heart muscle, liver, etc.<br>Can you already smell the danger of getting sick with such a weakened body? No B vitamins, all organs are weak, everything is out of balance... It&rsquo;s every microbe&rsquo;s wet dream.</p><p>Luckily, if you just stop eating that stuff, and eat like you and like my two friends did, you can easily beat it. With no hunger at all. It will take a bit longer. But it will definitely feel a lot better. One of them described it &ldquo;like being new-born&ldquo;.<br>Oh, and as a nice side-effect, because of not eating heated (=defective) proteins, he lost his summer asthma.</p><p>If I wouldn&rsquo;t have seen it myself, I would still not believe it.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You    re not the only one .
Two friends of mine had the same experience .
Little to no short carbohydrates ( long ones are ok ) , no denatured ( = heated ) animal proteins , and not only did they eat lots of vegetables , fruits and nuts , but literally shitloads of fat .
They had no compunction drinking olive oil straight from the bottle !
( Well , I thought that was disgusting and wouldn    t go that far .
But it    s obviously not something disgusting per se .
) They lost more weight than they could compensate with eating and body building.Another thing that most people forget , is that short carbohydrates deprive the body of B vitamins , which usually come with the carbohydrates when it    s wholemeal .
So you get a vitamin B deficiency .
One result , other than that it    s obviously bad for your whole body , is that your brain essentially needs them .
So in essence , those sugars also make you dumb .
Which perhaps explains why people seem to get dumber and dumber.And after being processed , you got loads of energy in your blood stream in a matter of minutes , but your cells can never need that much that quickly .
So since the sugars damage your blood vessels , they must be moved out , transformed into fat , and stored in your fat cells for later.But then , your stomach is empty , and your blood too .
So after another couple of minutes , there in no energy left for any further actions.This is a problem , since your body does not like giving up his fat cells .
If you can get food without your body doing that work , it prefers that .
So... you get hungry again .
Perhaps even worse than before .
It    s a vicious cycle that may remind you of something... * nudge * nudge * drug addiction * nudge * nudge * Of course the obvious fix would be , is to go hungry long enough , to use the energy up... if you can... haha.But now the worst thing : That wouldn    t even use up any fat cells for the first two weeks .
Since your body switches to an emergency metabolism , where it takes the energy out of essential organs , like your heart muscle , liver , etc.Can you already smell the danger of getting sick with such a weakened body ?
No B vitamins , all organs are weak , everything is out of balance... It    s every microbe    s wet dream.Luckily , if you just stop eating that stuff , and eat like you and like my two friends did , you can easily beat it .
With no hunger at all .
It will take a bit longer .
But it will definitely feel a lot better .
One of them described it    like being new-born    .Oh , and as a nice side-effect , because of not eating heated ( = defective ) proteins , he lost his summer asthma.If I wouldn    t have seen it myself , I would still not believe it .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You’re not the only one.
Two friends of mine had the same experience.
Little to no short carbohydrates (long ones are ok), no denatured (=heated) animal proteins, and not only did they eat lots of vegetables, fruits and nuts, but literally shitloads of fat.
They had no compunction drinking olive oil straight from the bottle!
(Well, I thought that was disgusting and wouldn’t go that far.
But it’s obviously not something disgusting per se.
)They lost more weight than they could compensate with eating and body building.Another thing that most people forget, is that short carbohydrates deprive the body of B vitamins, which usually come with the carbohydrates when it’s wholemeal.
So you get a vitamin B deficiency.
One result, other than that it’s obviously bad for your whole body, is that your brain essentially needs them.
So in essence, those sugars also make you dumb.
Which perhaps explains why people seem to get dumber and dumber.And after being processed, you got loads of energy in your blood stream in a matter of minutes, but your cells can never need that much that quickly.
So since the sugars damage your blood vessels, they must be moved out, transformed into fat, and stored in your fat cells for later.But then, your stomach is empty, and your blood too.
So after another couple of minutes, there in no energy left for any further actions.This is a problem, since your body does not like giving up his fat cells.
If you can get food without your body doing that work, it prefers that.
So... you get hungry again.
Perhaps even worse than before.
It’s a vicious cycle that may remind you of something... *nudge*nudge* drug addiction *nudge*nudge*Of course the obvious fix would be, is to go hungry long enough, to use the energy up... if you can... haha.But now the worst thing: That wouldn’t even use up any fat cells for the first two weeks.
Since your body switches to an emergency metabolism, where it takes the energy out of essential organs, like your heart muscle, liver, etc.Can you already smell the danger of getting sick with such a weakened body?
No B vitamins, all organs are weak, everything is out of balance... It’s every microbe’s wet dream.Luckily, if you just stop eating that stuff, and eat like you and like my two friends did, you can easily beat it.
With no hunger at all.
It will take a bit longer.
But it will definitely feel a lot better.
One of them described it “like being new-born“.Oh, and as a nice side-effect, because of not eating heated (=defective) proteins, he lost his summer asthma.If I wouldn’t have seen it myself, I would still not believe it.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656644</id>
	<title>Do It yourself Always</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269875340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only way to insure a truly healthy diet -- low in fat, salt, sugar and high in grains and fiber -- is to prepare all of your own meals all of the time.</p><p>Virtually everything that is sold supermarkets or restaurants -- aside from fresh and unprepared produce -- does not qualify as being healthy.</p><p>Preparing ones own meals each and every day requires a good investment of time and effort, but the sad fact is that our society is tooled only for the production of these "addictive" foodstuffs.  Thus, we all must say goodbye to convenience if we desire to eat in a healthy manner.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only way to insure a truly healthy diet -- low in fat , salt , sugar and high in grains and fiber -- is to prepare all of your own meals all of the time.Virtually everything that is sold supermarkets or restaurants -- aside from fresh and unprepared produce -- does not qualify as being healthy.Preparing ones own meals each and every day requires a good investment of time and effort , but the sad fact is that our society is tooled only for the production of these " addictive " foodstuffs .
Thus , we all must say goodbye to convenience if we desire to eat in a healthy manner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only way to insure a truly healthy diet -- low in fat, salt, sugar and high in grains and fiber -- is to prepare all of your own meals all of the time.Virtually everything that is sold supermarkets or restaurants -- aside from fresh and unprepared produce -- does not qualify as being healthy.Preparing ones own meals each and every day requires a good investment of time and effort, but the sad fact is that our society is tooled only for the production of these "addictive" foodstuffs.
Thus, we all must say goodbye to convenience if we desire to eat in a healthy manner.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657912</id>
	<title>Re:Why I am not surprised ? Oh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269880440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you read the wikipedia article it seems that the film made some pretty dubios claims, especially if you look at the results of the alternative "experiments".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you read the wikipedia article it seems that the film made some pretty dubios claims , especially if you look at the results of the alternative " experiments " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you read the wikipedia article it seems that the film made some pretty dubios claims, especially if you look at the results of the alternative "experiments".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656104</id>
	<title>You think kicking food is hard, try sleep!</title>
	<author>BetterSense</author>
	<datestamp>1269872940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I believe the article...food is very addictive. I try and try, but still I keep coming back for food. It's a very persistent addiction. When I try to quit, I get cravings that manifest themselves as dizzyness and gnawing pain in my abdomen. Seemingly the only way to stop the torment is to cave in and eat food. Water is difficult too; I try to tell myself that I don't need it and don't want it anymore but when I finally cave and have a drink of water it feels so refreshing going down that it's like ecstasy. It's that satiated, comfortable and full feeling that keeps me crawling back to the Brita pitcher. But an addiction even worse than food or drink is sleep. No matter how hard I try, I just can't seem to kick the habit. I always seem to doze off eventually, craving the sweet solitude of REM and the rested afterglow. I have a long way to go but one day  hope to be addiction-free.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe the article...food is very addictive .
I try and try , but still I keep coming back for food .
It 's a very persistent addiction .
When I try to quit , I get cravings that manifest themselves as dizzyness and gnawing pain in my abdomen .
Seemingly the only way to stop the torment is to cave in and eat food .
Water is difficult too ; I try to tell myself that I do n't need it and do n't want it anymore but when I finally cave and have a drink of water it feels so refreshing going down that it 's like ecstasy .
It 's that satiated , comfortable and full feeling that keeps me crawling back to the Brita pitcher .
But an addiction even worse than food or drink is sleep .
No matter how hard I try , I just ca n't seem to kick the habit .
I always seem to doze off eventually , craving the sweet solitude of REM and the rested afterglow .
I have a long way to go but one day hope to be addiction-free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe the article...food is very addictive.
I try and try, but still I keep coming back for food.
It's a very persistent addiction.
When I try to quit, I get cravings that manifest themselves as dizzyness and gnawing pain in my abdomen.
Seemingly the only way to stop the torment is to cave in and eat food.
Water is difficult too; I try to tell myself that I don't need it and don't want it anymore but when I finally cave and have a drink of water it feels so refreshing going down that it's like ecstasy.
It's that satiated, comfortable and full feeling that keeps me crawling back to the Brita pitcher.
But an addiction even worse than food or drink is sleep.
No matter how hard I try, I just can't seem to kick the habit.
I always seem to doze off eventually, craving the sweet solitude of REM and the rested afterglow.
I have a long way to go but one day  hope to be addiction-free.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658952</id>
	<title>Re:It is only a matter of time...</title>
	<author>Ma'at</author>
	<datestamp>1269885240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So here is the thing.  Government policy in the United States is designed to promote obesity by socializing the costs of obesity.  The first cost is the food itself, which the government pays for in the forms of, to name two, food stamps and the earned income tax credit.  Everyone in the United States is required, by law, to pay for food to feed fat people. Really.  The second cost of obesity, greatly increased medical care, is now socialized as well.  Those costs could be reflected immediately to the individual in the price of insurance when the insurance market is deregulated and insurers are permitted to charge fatties more.   If all those fatties had to pay for their food and pay more for health insurance then their would be a lot fewer fatties.  Instead, now, a person who eats responsibly and exercises and who will require far less medical treatment as a result will pay the same amount for medical insurance as they guy who eats two dozen doughnuts for breakfast.</p></div><p>You do realize that the countries you mention at the beginning of you post (Sweden, Japan, and Uraguay) all have socialized medicine and provide food-stamp like programs for the poor?  Nobody wants to be fat and sick.  If I told you that if you moved into the projects and quit your job, you could eat Twinkies until you went into a diabetic coma, would you?  If you want to look at government causes for obesity look at subsides for grain and sugar farmers, not the fact that now some poor people will get the same medical care as the rich.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So here is the thing .
Government policy in the United States is designed to promote obesity by socializing the costs of obesity .
The first cost is the food itself , which the government pays for in the forms of , to name two , food stamps and the earned income tax credit .
Everyone in the United States is required , by law , to pay for food to feed fat people .
Really. The second cost of obesity , greatly increased medical care , is now socialized as well .
Those costs could be reflected immediately to the individual in the price of insurance when the insurance market is deregulated and insurers are permitted to charge fatties more .
If all those fatties had to pay for their food and pay more for health insurance then their would be a lot fewer fatties .
Instead , now , a person who eats responsibly and exercises and who will require far less medical treatment as a result will pay the same amount for medical insurance as they guy who eats two dozen doughnuts for breakfast.You do realize that the countries you mention at the beginning of you post ( Sweden , Japan , and Uraguay ) all have socialized medicine and provide food-stamp like programs for the poor ?
Nobody wants to be fat and sick .
If I told you that if you moved into the projects and quit your job , you could eat Twinkies until you went into a diabetic coma , would you ?
If you want to look at government causes for obesity look at subsides for grain and sugar farmers , not the fact that now some poor people will get the same medical care as the rich .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So here is the thing.
Government policy in the United States is designed to promote obesity by socializing the costs of obesity.
The first cost is the food itself, which the government pays for in the forms of, to name two, food stamps and the earned income tax credit.
Everyone in the United States is required, by law, to pay for food to feed fat people.
Really.  The second cost of obesity, greatly increased medical care, is now socialized as well.
Those costs could be reflected immediately to the individual in the price of insurance when the insurance market is deregulated and insurers are permitted to charge fatties more.
If all those fatties had to pay for their food and pay more for health insurance then their would be a lot fewer fatties.
Instead, now, a person who eats responsibly and exercises and who will require far less medical treatment as a result will pay the same amount for medical insurance as they guy who eats two dozen doughnuts for breakfast.You do realize that the countries you mention at the beginning of you post (Sweden, Japan, and Uraguay) all have socialized medicine and provide food-stamp like programs for the poor?
Nobody wants to be fat and sick.
If I told you that if you moved into the projects and quit your job, you could eat Twinkies until you went into a diabetic coma, would you?
If you want to look at government causes for obesity look at subsides for grain and sugar farmers, not the fact that now some poor people will get the same medical care as the rich.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656948</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657448</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, I can see that...</title>
	<author>musicalmicah</author>
	<datestamp>1269878700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The one thing about these foods that I don't agree with is that the poor need to eat them because they can't afford food that is good for them. That's a load of rubbish. My wife has been able to buy enough good, canned vegetables like beans, chickpeas and corn to feed a family of four for at least a week for $50. You can do a lot with those staples if you try.</p></div><p>And if you already have the land for it (or even a small sun-exposed area), a garden is even cheaper--not to mention healthier--and doesn't require a resume.</p><p>I do think food culture is an issue, however. Millions of dollars are being pumped into advertising mac 'n' cheese, hamburgers, beer, and crappy candy bars. Meanwhile, the very name "Whole Foods" represents a chain of grocery stores that targets the condo-purchasing elite.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The one thing about these foods that I do n't agree with is that the poor need to eat them because they ca n't afford food that is good for them .
That 's a load of rubbish .
My wife has been able to buy enough good , canned vegetables like beans , chickpeas and corn to feed a family of four for at least a week for $ 50 .
You can do a lot with those staples if you try.And if you already have the land for it ( or even a small sun-exposed area ) , a garden is even cheaper--not to mention healthier--and does n't require a resume.I do think food culture is an issue , however .
Millions of dollars are being pumped into advertising mac 'n ' cheese , hamburgers , beer , and crappy candy bars .
Meanwhile , the very name " Whole Foods " represents a chain of grocery stores that targets the condo-purchasing elite .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The one thing about these foods that I don't agree with is that the poor need to eat them because they can't afford food that is good for them.
That's a load of rubbish.
My wife has been able to buy enough good, canned vegetables like beans, chickpeas and corn to feed a family of four for at least a week for $50.
You can do a lot with those staples if you try.And if you already have the land for it (or even a small sun-exposed area), a garden is even cheaper--not to mention healthier--and doesn't require a resume.I do think food culture is an issue, however.
Millions of dollars are being pumped into advertising mac 'n' cheese, hamburgers, beer, and crappy candy bars.
Meanwhile, the very name "Whole Foods" represents a chain of grocery stores that targets the condo-purchasing elite.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656034</id>
	<title>In Other News</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269872580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Scientists find that cocaine may cause cocaine-like addiction!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Scientists find that cocaine may cause cocaine-like addiction !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scientists find that cocaine may cause cocaine-like addiction!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656482</id>
	<title>In other news...</title>
	<author>Bartles</author>
	<datestamp>1269874680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In other news, humans that gorged themselves on rat food quickly became bloated with intestinal gas, and then died of starvation within several weeks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In other news , humans that gorged themselves on rat food quickly became bloated with intestinal gas , and then died of starvation within several weeks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other news, humans that gorged themselves on rat food quickly became bloated with intestinal gas, and then died of starvation within several weeks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655878</id>
	<title>This is your brain. This is your brain on drugs.</title>
	<author>unclepedro</author>
	<datestamp>1269871560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any questions?</p><p>Yeah, can I get mine over easy? It goes in the syringe better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any questions ? Yeah , can I get mine over easy ?
It goes in the syringe better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any questions?Yeah, can I get mine over easy?
It goes in the syringe better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656774</id>
	<title>So now "Just say NO to Fat"?</title>
	<author>Chas</author>
	<datestamp>1269875880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please tell me the various social busybodies in the government aren't going to start with this shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please tell me the various social busybodies in the government are n't going to start with this shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please tell me the various social busybodies in the government aren't going to start with this shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655962</id>
	<title>Wow, I think this was predicted on</title>
	<author>NotSoHeavyD3</author>
	<datestamp>1269872100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Married with Children in one episode where a character admitted to be addicted to pie.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Married with Children in one episode where a character admitted to be addicted to pie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Married with Children in one episode where a character admitted to be addicted to pie.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657102</id>
	<title>solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269877440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Solution:?<br>Put cocaine in healthy foods. Problem solved</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Solution : ? Put cocaine in healthy foods .
Problem solved</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Solution:?Put cocaine in healthy foods.
Problem solved</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655952</id>
	<title>mmm</title>
	<author>Ogive17</author>
	<datestamp>1269872040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My gf gives me a free pass to stop by Wendy's once a week so I can get my fill of a double cheeseburger.  If they weren't so unhealthy I would probably get one every day.  I do have a sliver of willpower left.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My gf gives me a free pass to stop by Wendy 's once a week so I can get my fill of a double cheeseburger .
If they were n't so unhealthy I would probably get one every day .
I do have a sliver of willpower left .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My gf gives me a free pass to stop by Wendy's once a week so I can get my fill of a double cheeseburger.
If they weren't so unhealthy I would probably get one every day.
I do have a sliver of willpower left.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656656</id>
	<title>Re:Solely focused on consuming food...</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1269875340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it also possible that the obese rats felt less of the electrical charge since they had more body mass?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it also possible that the obese rats felt less of the electrical charge since they had more body mass ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it also possible that the obese rats felt less of the electrical charge since they had more body mass?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656052</id>
	<title>So now..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269872700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now that we've shown that cocaine is only as bad as Burger King, can I finally get a double cheese burger, hold the lettuce, add 1g of coke?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that we 've shown that cocaine is only as bad as Burger King , can I finally get a double cheese burger , hold the lettuce , add 1g of coke ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that we've shown that cocaine is only as bad as Burger King, can I finally get a double cheese burger, hold the lettuce, add 1g of coke?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31660602</id>
	<title>Re:OK, so now...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269892560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah...I guess I've always thought that, but you have said it and I agree. It does elicit the same emotional response from me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah...I guess I 've always thought that , but you have said it and I agree .
It does elicit the same emotional response from me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah...I guess I've always thought that, but you have said it and I agree.
It does elicit the same emotional response from me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656632</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, I can see that...</title>
	<author>Lueseiseki</author>
	<datestamp>1269875280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not all people are smart or determined enough for that.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P There's a McDonalds on every street corner!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not all people are smart or determined enough for that .
: P There 's a McDonalds on every street corner !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not all people are smart or determined enough for that.
:P There's a McDonalds on every street corner!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31684602</id>
	<title>Re:Now the question regards addiction strength.</title>
	<author>SoupIsGoodFood\_42</author>
	<datestamp>1270029720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Though I suppose the mere notion of shades of "addictiveness" can be dishonest itself, considering the binary nature of addiction (you either are, or you aren't, and exhibit a different set of behaviors based on that).</i></p><p>Since when? It's hard to think of a subject filled with more vagueness and degrees of feelings and behaviors than human psychology. The brain isn't a binary computer, even though it may make it easier to classify and talk about it as such.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Though I suppose the mere notion of shades of " addictiveness " can be dishonest itself , considering the binary nature of addiction ( you either are , or you are n't , and exhibit a different set of behaviors based on that ) .Since when ?
It 's hard to think of a subject filled with more vagueness and degrees of feelings and behaviors than human psychology .
The brain is n't a binary computer , even though it may make it easier to classify and talk about it as such .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Though I suppose the mere notion of shades of "addictiveness" can be dishonest itself, considering the binary nature of addiction (you either are, or you aren't, and exhibit a different set of behaviors based on that).Since when?
It's hard to think of a subject filled with more vagueness and degrees of feelings and behaviors than human psychology.
The brain isn't a binary computer, even though it may make it easier to classify and talk about it as such.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656346</id>
	<title>Re:You think kicking food is hard, try sleep!</title>
	<author>stupid\_is</author>
	<datestamp>1269874080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You are probably not practised enough in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breatharian" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">art</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>You are probably not practised enough in the art [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are probably not practised enough in the art [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656214</id>
	<title>Reward System</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269873540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's a Wikipedia article on the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reward\_system" title="wikipedia.org">brain's reward system</a> [wikipedia.org]. I've not read the Wiki article but have tried to grasp some of the Berkeley, mit, Yale uni online lectures that speak to it. The problem I had with trying to understand it in general terms is that the system itself isn't  fully understood and, for a lay person like myself, it seems there's no difference in the mechanics between the motivations and rewards of a crack whore and a CEO, but that may just be the way it is. What seems to come into play is the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive\_functions" title="wikipedia.org">executive planning functions</a> [wikipedia.org] of the brain and whether they act as a damper to limit a runaway reward system. The Executive Functions seem to reside in the frontal lobes and usually the sad story of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phineas\_Gage" title="wikipedia.org">Phineas Gage</a> [wikipedia.org] is trotted out to model loss of Executive Function. If this post gets modded up a lot I'll post some more<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) well maybe if I'm sure I'll get modded up even more and more...</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a Wikipedia article on the brain 's reward system [ wikipedia.org ] .
I 've not read the Wiki article but have tried to grasp some of the Berkeley , mit , Yale uni online lectures that speak to it .
The problem I had with trying to understand it in general terms is that the system itself is n't fully understood and , for a lay person like myself , it seems there 's no difference in the mechanics between the motivations and rewards of a crack whore and a CEO , but that may just be the way it is .
What seems to come into play is the executive planning functions [ wikipedia.org ] of the brain and whether they act as a damper to limit a runaway reward system .
The Executive Functions seem to reside in the frontal lobes and usually the sad story of Phineas Gage [ wikipedia.org ] is trotted out to model loss of Executive Function .
If this post gets modded up a lot I 'll post some more : ) well maybe if I 'm sure I 'll get modded up even more and more.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a Wikipedia article on the brain's reward system [wikipedia.org].
I've not read the Wiki article but have tried to grasp some of the Berkeley, mit, Yale uni online lectures that speak to it.
The problem I had with trying to understand it in general terms is that the system itself isn't  fully understood and, for a lay person like myself, it seems there's no difference in the mechanics between the motivations and rewards of a crack whore and a CEO, but that may just be the way it is.
What seems to come into play is the executive planning functions [wikipedia.org] of the brain and whether they act as a damper to limit a runaway reward system.
The Executive Functions seem to reside in the frontal lobes and usually the sad story of Phineas Gage [wikipedia.org] is trotted out to model loss of Executive Function.
If this post gets modded up a lot I'll post some more :) well maybe if I'm sure I'll get modded up even more and more...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31665824</id>
	<title>Re:Human food</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269877320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Few is a numerical term.<br>Phew is an exclamation.</p><p>I think you want the latter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Few is a numerical term.Phew is an exclamation.I think you want the latter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Few is a numerical term.Phew is an exclamation.I think you want the latter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658558</id>
	<title>Re:It is only a matter of time...</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1269883320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, obesity is an increasing problem for much of the world. America is just ahead of the curve.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , obesity is an increasing problem for much of the world .
America is just ahead of the curve .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, obesity is an increasing problem for much of the world.
America is just ahead of the curve.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656948</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656322</id>
	<title>Rats that gorged themselves on human food!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269873960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Different critters have different dietary needs.</p><p>Dogs who gorge themselves on cat food quickly become obese (more so than dogs who stick to dog food).</p><p>I really don't think a rat study of human food consumption proves much per se.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Different critters have different dietary needs.Dogs who gorge themselves on cat food quickly become obese ( more so than dogs who stick to dog food ) .I really do n't think a rat study of human food consumption proves much per se .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Different critters have different dietary needs.Dogs who gorge themselves on cat food quickly become obese (more so than dogs who stick to dog food).I really don't think a rat study of human food consumption proves much per se.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656480</id>
	<title>Re:Solely focused on consuming food...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269874680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(Posting anonymously in case any future insurance company is reading this.)</p><p>&gt; Although they are harmed physically by their obesity,<br>&gt; they continue at their own detriment.</p><p>I'm in a 12-step program for compulsive eating (ceahow.org), recovering since 06-Sep-2002.</p><p>Before program, I was &gt;300lbs (I'm ~6'3").  I used to eat  US$25 at McDonald's every meal. Or 2 large delivery pizzas. Or I'd get 2-3 normal person's carry-out dinners and eat those myself.</p><p>Eventually, I was diagnosed with type-II diabetes. I was put on Actos.  Actos is an insulin sensitizer which is, IIRC, supposed to make my body better use the insulin my weakened pancreas could produce.</p><p>One of the side effects was, when I binged, my blood sugar would quickly crash and my vision would blur. I couldn't read, had trouble seeing well enough to drive. So I planned my binges on staying home.</p><p>I had physical, tangible proof my behavior was damaging me *every single time I did it* and yet I continued.</p><p>It was about the high.</p><p>When I ignored the craving, concentrated on not eating ("Don't eat don't eat don't eat don't eat"), the pressure would build. I would give in to the craving to simply get rid of the pressure, so I could on with my day. The longer I'd go (hours, usually), the harder I'd snap.</p><p>I know this article shows a single rat study that may or may not be scientific proof of a causal link in humans.  All I can say is I see myself in the rats' behavior.  I sympathize with what the rats were going through.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( Posting anonymously in case any future insurance company is reading this .
) &gt; Although they are harmed physically by their obesity , &gt; they continue at their own detriment.I 'm in a 12-step program for compulsive eating ( ceahow.org ) , recovering since 06-Sep-2002.Before program , I was &gt; 300lbs ( I 'm ~ 6'3 " ) .
I used to eat US $ 25 at McDonald 's every meal .
Or 2 large delivery pizzas .
Or I 'd get 2-3 normal person 's carry-out dinners and eat those myself.Eventually , I was diagnosed with type-II diabetes .
I was put on Actos .
Actos is an insulin sensitizer which is , IIRC , supposed to make my body better use the insulin my weakened pancreas could produce.One of the side effects was , when I binged , my blood sugar would quickly crash and my vision would blur .
I could n't read , had trouble seeing well enough to drive .
So I planned my binges on staying home.I had physical , tangible proof my behavior was damaging me * every single time I did it * and yet I continued.It was about the high.When I ignored the craving , concentrated on not eating ( " Do n't eat do n't eat do n't eat do n't eat " ) , the pressure would build .
I would give in to the craving to simply get rid of the pressure , so I could on with my day .
The longer I 'd go ( hours , usually ) , the harder I 'd snap.I know this article shows a single rat study that may or may not be scientific proof of a causal link in humans .
All I can say is I see myself in the rats ' behavior .
I sympathize with what the rats were going through .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(Posting anonymously in case any future insurance company is reading this.
)&gt; Although they are harmed physically by their obesity,&gt; they continue at their own detriment.I'm in a 12-step program for compulsive eating (ceahow.org), recovering since 06-Sep-2002.Before program, I was &gt;300lbs (I'm ~6'3").
I used to eat  US$25 at McDonald's every meal.
Or 2 large delivery pizzas.
Or I'd get 2-3 normal person's carry-out dinners and eat those myself.Eventually, I was diagnosed with type-II diabetes.
I was put on Actos.
Actos is an insulin sensitizer which is, IIRC, supposed to make my body better use the insulin my weakened pancreas could produce.One of the side effects was, when I binged, my blood sugar would quickly crash and my vision would blur.
I couldn't read, had trouble seeing well enough to drive.
So I planned my binges on staying home.I had physical, tangible proof my behavior was damaging me *every single time I did it* and yet I continued.It was about the high.When I ignored the craving, concentrated on not eating ("Don't eat don't eat don't eat don't eat"), the pressure would build.
I would give in to the craving to simply get rid of the pressure, so I could on with my day.
The longer I'd go (hours, usually), the harder I'd snap.I know this article shows a single rat study that may or may not be scientific proof of a causal link in humans.
All I can say is I see myself in the rats' behavior.
I sympathize with what the rats were going through.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655876</id>
	<title>Human food</title>
	<author>kiehlster</author>
	<datestamp>1269871560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh, few... At first I read that as rats gorging themselves on human <i>fat</i>.  Wait a minute... maybe the end of the world will come when rats get a cocaine-like addiction to eating humans. Everybody PANIC!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , few... At first I read that as rats gorging themselves on human fat .
Wait a minute... maybe the end of the world will come when rats get a cocaine-like addiction to eating humans .
Everybody PANIC !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, few... At first I read that as rats gorging themselves on human fat.
Wait a minute... maybe the end of the world will come when rats get a cocaine-like addiction to eating humans.
Everybody PANIC!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656972</id>
	<title>Re:OK, so now...</title>
	<author>cathyp</author>
	<datestamp>1269876840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're ignoring physiological and socioeconomic factors involved in both...</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're ignoring physiological and socioeconomic factors involved in both.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're ignoring physiological and socioeconomic factors involved in both...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31667358</id>
	<title>Re:Human food</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269980460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh phew... At first I thought you deliberately wrote "few".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh phew... At first I thought you deliberately wrote " few " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh phew... At first I thought you deliberately wrote "few".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658692</id>
	<title>Re:OK, so now...</title>
	<author>dswensen</author>
	<datestamp>1269884040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks for posting this! It's good to know whose respect not to value.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for posting this !
It 's good to know whose respect not to value .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for posting this!
It's good to know whose respect not to value.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657942</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, I can see that...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269880560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"That's a load of rubbish. My wife has been able to buy enough good, canned vegetables like beans, chickpeas and corn to feed a family of four for at least a week for $50."</p><p>Check the salt levels in these canned vegetables.  Frozen vegetables are better for salts (but more expensive).  Fundamentally healthier food (fresh fruits, vegetables, less processed cheeses) is more expensive (in large part because it is not as subsidized by the government).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" That 's a load of rubbish .
My wife has been able to buy enough good , canned vegetables like beans , chickpeas and corn to feed a family of four for at least a week for $ 50 .
" Check the salt levels in these canned vegetables .
Frozen vegetables are better for salts ( but more expensive ) .
Fundamentally healthier food ( fresh fruits , vegetables , less processed cheeses ) is more expensive ( in large part because it is not as subsidized by the government ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"That's a load of rubbish.
My wife has been able to buy enough good, canned vegetables like beans, chickpeas and corn to feed a family of four for at least a week for $50.
"Check the salt levels in these canned vegetables.
Frozen vegetables are better for salts (but more expensive).
Fundamentally healthier food (fresh fruits, vegetables, less processed cheeses) is more expensive (in large part because it is not as subsidized by the government).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655848</id>
	<title>OK, so now...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269871440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>...I have just as much respect for fat people as I do for drug addicts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...I have just as much respect for fat people as I do for drug addicts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I have just as much respect for fat people as I do for drug addicts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656134</id>
	<title>Why I am not surprised ? Oh...</title>
	<author>o'reor</author>
	<datestamp>1269873060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Watch the online documentary <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1432315846377280008" title="google.com">Supersize me !</a> [google.com] and see (and hear) Morgan Spurlock describe the addictive effects of sugar-rich and fatty food....<p>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super\_Size\_Me" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super\_Size\_Me</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Watch the online documentary Supersize me !
[ google.com ] and see ( and hear ) Morgan Spurlock describe the addictive effects of sugar-rich and fatty food... . http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super \ _Size \ _Me [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Watch the online documentary Supersize me !
[google.com] and see (and hear) Morgan Spurlock describe the addictive effects of sugar-rich and fatty food....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super\_Size\_Me [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31728240</id>
	<title>What? No of course they don't!</title>
	<author>Gaffod</author>
	<datestamp>1270385880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fat is not an opiate! What is this tomfoolery?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fat is not an opiate !
What is this tomfoolery ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fat is not an opiate!
What is this tomfoolery?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656678</id>
	<title>Re:Solely focused on consuming food...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269875400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So you read the article and see "fat people eat to their own detriment, and it's their own fault".  I read the article and see "fat people eat to their own detriment, and there might be a considerable extrinsic factor assisting this unhealthy behavior".</p><p>One of us is reading the article wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you read the article and see " fat people eat to their own detriment , and it 's their own fault " .
I read the article and see " fat people eat to their own detriment , and there might be a considerable extrinsic factor assisting this unhealthy behavior " .One of us is reading the article wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you read the article and see "fat people eat to their own detriment, and it's their own fault".
I read the article and see "fat people eat to their own detriment, and there might be a considerable extrinsic factor assisting this unhealthy behavior".One of us is reading the article wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31668538</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, I can see that...</title>
	<author>drsquare</author>
	<datestamp>1269952380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>They taste a lot better most of the time than stuff that is good for you without qualification. That keeps your brain cookin with pleasure-inducing chemistry.</p></div></blockquote><p>Actually a lot of junk food doesn't actually taste very good, or of anything at all, it just has the right levels of fat, salt and sugar to stimulate the brain's reward response. Consider McDonalds, when you eat it the brain gives you a reward so it feels good to eat, even though there isn't actually any flavour in it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They taste a lot better most of the time than stuff that is good for you without qualification .
That keeps your brain cookin with pleasure-inducing chemistry.Actually a lot of junk food does n't actually taste very good , or of anything at all , it just has the right levels of fat , salt and sugar to stimulate the brain 's reward response .
Consider McDonalds , when you eat it the brain gives you a reward so it feels good to eat , even though there is n't actually any flavour in it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They taste a lot better most of the time than stuff that is good for you without qualification.
That keeps your brain cookin with pleasure-inducing chemistry.Actually a lot of junk food doesn't actually taste very good, or of anything at all, it just has the right levels of fat, salt and sugar to stimulate the brain's reward response.
Consider McDonalds, when you eat it the brain gives you a reward so it feels good to eat, even though there isn't actually any flavour in it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656124</id>
	<title>gotta love the footer fortune</title>
	<author>rarel</author>
	<datestamp>1269873060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Talk about relevance !<p>
<i>Loud burping while walking around the airport is prohibited in Halstead, Kansas.</i> </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Talk about relevance !
Loud burping while walking around the airport is prohibited in Halstead , Kansas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Talk about relevance !
Loud burping while walking around the airport is prohibited in Halstead, Kansas. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31666904</id>
	<title>Re:I can't compare...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1269888240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know that Whiskas did, and most likely still does that, with their cat &ldquo;food&rdquo;. There are substances that are and look harmless to us, but are addictive to carnivores like cats. That&rsquo;s why cars behave so weirdly when having come in contact with industrial (e.g. canned) cat &ldquo;food&rdquo;.</p><p>I recommend the simple and obvious natural diet for your cat: Mice, birds, maybe an insect here or there, some grass for digestion, water, that&rsquo;s nearly it. What&rdquo;s left comes from your cat running around in the wilderness.<br>(Yes, if (s)he is your cat, (s)he <em>will</em> come back. Ours always did.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know that Whiskas did , and most likely still does that , with their cat    food    .
There are substances that are and look harmless to us , but are addictive to carnivores like cats .
That    s why cars behave so weirdly when having come in contact with industrial ( e.g .
canned ) cat    food    .I recommend the simple and obvious natural diet for your cat : Mice , birds , maybe an insect here or there , some grass for digestion , water , that    s nearly it .
What    s left comes from your cat running around in the wilderness .
( Yes , if ( s ) he is your cat , ( s ) he will come back .
Ours always did .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know that Whiskas did, and most likely still does that, with their cat “food”.
There are substances that are and look harmless to us, but are addictive to carnivores like cats.
That’s why cars behave so weirdly when having come in contact with industrial (e.g.
canned) cat “food”.I recommend the simple and obvious natural diet for your cat: Mice, birds, maybe an insect here or there, some grass for digestion, water, that’s nearly it.
What”s left comes from your cat running around in the wilderness.
(Yes, if (s)he is your cat, (s)he will come back.
Ours always did.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31659170</id>
	<title>Re:mmm</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1269886200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does your life insurance list your gf as beneficiary? Perhaps she's not being as nice as you think she is...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does your life insurance list your gf as beneficiary ?
Perhaps she 's not being as nice as you think she is.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does your life insurance list your gf as beneficiary?
Perhaps she's not being as nice as you think she is...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655852</id>
	<title>Which could explain why...</title>
	<author>stakovahflow</author>
	<datestamp>1269871440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I eat so much brisket. Cheaper and more legal than the "good stuff"...</p><p>Now, if only we could figure out this "World Peace" thing, we'd be set.</p><p>Oh, and cancer, too...</p><p>Cheers!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I eat so much brisket .
Cheaper and more legal than the " good stuff " ...Now , if only we could figure out this " World Peace " thing , we 'd be set.Oh , and cancer , too...Cheers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I eat so much brisket.
Cheaper and more legal than the "good stuff"...Now, if only we could figure out this "World Peace" thing, we'd be set.Oh, and cancer, too...Cheers!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656830</id>
	<title>CHeap high</title>
	<author>edrobinson</author>
	<datestamp>1269876180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does this mean I can snort a line of bacon and get high!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean I can snort a line of bacon and get high !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean I can snort a line of bacon and get high!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656320</id>
	<title>It's more neurological than genetic...</title>
	<author>Temujin\_12</author>
	<datestamp>1269873960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As we come to understand more and more about neurology and genetic, an increasing amount of studies on human obesity are shifting from a genetic focus to a neurological focus.</p><p>Dr. David Kessler, former FDA commissioner and someone who has struggled with weight in his own life, has an excellent book out called <a href="http://www.amazon.com/End-Overeating-Insatiable-American-Appetite/dp/1605297852/ref=sr\_1\_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1269869865&amp;sr=8-1" title="amazon.com">The End of Overeating: Taking Control of the Insatiable American Appetite</a> [amazon.com]. <a href="http://www.wbur.org/npr/106470909" title="wbur.org">NPR</a> [wbur.org] has done some very good interviews with him.</p><p>He admits that he started his study expecting to head down the road of genetics. But he found the research and data kept pointing him to the brain instead. One interesting tidbit from his research: They did a study where they had a group of people, some overweight and some normal weight, and asked each person to identify their favorite snack or dessert. They would then place each person individually in a room with large portions of their favorite food. What they found was that everybody, upon seeing their favorite snack/dessert, had the same neurological response (endorphin-like response). But what was interesting was that for those who weren't overweight this response ended after they ate enough to be filled. For those who were overweight, they found that the brain didn't stop producing this response until the food was completely gone.</p><p>Dr. Kessler, as well as many more scientists, are starting to focus more on obesity from a sociological and behavioral angle than a genetic angle. He keeps mentioning how obesity has more to do with the relationship people have with food than anything else (and focuses a lot on what kind of relationship we are teaching our children to have with food).</p><p>Of course, genetics are still important. But not as much as we've initially thought it to be.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As we come to understand more and more about neurology and genetic , an increasing amount of studies on human obesity are shifting from a genetic focus to a neurological focus.Dr .
David Kessler , former FDA commissioner and someone who has struggled with weight in his own life , has an excellent book out called The End of Overeating : Taking Control of the Insatiable American Appetite [ amazon.com ] .
NPR [ wbur.org ] has done some very good interviews with him.He admits that he started his study expecting to head down the road of genetics .
But he found the research and data kept pointing him to the brain instead .
One interesting tidbit from his research : They did a study where they had a group of people , some overweight and some normal weight , and asked each person to identify their favorite snack or dessert .
They would then place each person individually in a room with large portions of their favorite food .
What they found was that everybody , upon seeing their favorite snack/dessert , had the same neurological response ( endorphin-like response ) .
But what was interesting was that for those who were n't overweight this response ended after they ate enough to be filled .
For those who were overweight , they found that the brain did n't stop producing this response until the food was completely gone.Dr .
Kessler , as well as many more scientists , are starting to focus more on obesity from a sociological and behavioral angle than a genetic angle .
He keeps mentioning how obesity has more to do with the relationship people have with food than anything else ( and focuses a lot on what kind of relationship we are teaching our children to have with food ) .Of course , genetics are still important .
But not as much as we 've initially thought it to be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As we come to understand more and more about neurology and genetic, an increasing amount of studies on human obesity are shifting from a genetic focus to a neurological focus.Dr.
David Kessler, former FDA commissioner and someone who has struggled with weight in his own life, has an excellent book out called The End of Overeating: Taking Control of the Insatiable American Appetite [amazon.com].
NPR [wbur.org] has done some very good interviews with him.He admits that he started his study expecting to head down the road of genetics.
But he found the research and data kept pointing him to the brain instead.
One interesting tidbit from his research: They did a study where they had a group of people, some overweight and some normal weight, and asked each person to identify their favorite snack or dessert.
They would then place each person individually in a room with large portions of their favorite food.
What they found was that everybody, upon seeing their favorite snack/dessert, had the same neurological response (endorphin-like response).
But what was interesting was that for those who weren't overweight this response ended after they ate enough to be filled.
For those who were overweight, they found that the brain didn't stop producing this response until the food was completely gone.Dr.
Kessler, as well as many more scientists, are starting to focus more on obesity from a sociological and behavioral angle than a genetic angle.
He keeps mentioning how obesity has more to do with the relationship people have with food than anything else (and focuses a lot on what kind of relationship we are teaching our children to have with food).Of course, genetics are still important.
But not as much as we've initially thought it to be.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658798</id>
	<title>Re:Solely focused on consuming food...</title>
	<author>CODiNE</author>
	<datestamp>1269884580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had this buddy who was pretty big, sort of like the captain from Wall-E.  I'd seen him eat in many social situations and noticed he ate about the same amount of food I did.  Thought it was kind of odd that he'd be so large eating a normal amount of food every time I saw him but... weird.</p><p>Then later another buddy told me the two of them went to a burger place for lunch, and each got a regular hamburger.  Then afterwards after they'd said goodbye he noticed him sneak back and buy 2 more burgers.</p><p>So all this time when he's around anyone he'd watch what they order and get something the same size.  Then go home or somewhere else and eat 2x as much.  Sounds like a shame thing and a compulsion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had this buddy who was pretty big , sort of like the captain from Wall-E. I 'd seen him eat in many social situations and noticed he ate about the same amount of food I did .
Thought it was kind of odd that he 'd be so large eating a normal amount of food every time I saw him but... weird.Then later another buddy told me the two of them went to a burger place for lunch , and each got a regular hamburger .
Then afterwards after they 'd said goodbye he noticed him sneak back and buy 2 more burgers.So all this time when he 's around anyone he 'd watch what they order and get something the same size .
Then go home or somewhere else and eat 2x as much .
Sounds like a shame thing and a compulsion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had this buddy who was pretty big, sort of like the captain from Wall-E.  I'd seen him eat in many social situations and noticed he ate about the same amount of food I did.
Thought it was kind of odd that he'd be so large eating a normal amount of food every time I saw him but... weird.Then later another buddy told me the two of them went to a burger place for lunch, and each got a regular hamburger.
Then afterwards after they'd said goodbye he noticed him sneak back and buy 2 more burgers.So all this time when he's around anyone he'd watch what they order and get something the same size.
Then go home or somewhere else and eat 2x as much.
Sounds like a shame thing and a compulsion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658206</id>
	<title>Re:Human food</title>
	<author>omi5cron</author>
	<datestamp>1269881700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>there is a movie in there somewhere, jump on it quick before uwe boll does!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>there is a movie in there somewhere , jump on it quick before uwe boll does ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there is a movie in there somewhere, jump on it quick before uwe boll does!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31660598</id>
	<title>In other news...</title>
	<author>prodevel</author>
	<datestamp>1269892560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>water wet, sky blue.</htmltext>
<tokenext>water wet , sky blue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>water wet, sky blue.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656948</id>
	<title>It is only a matter of time...</title>
	<author>Jodka</author>
	<datestamp>1269876720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fat addiction is not sufficient to explain the United States obesity epidemic because fats are just as addictive in Sweden, Japan and Uruguay as they are in the United States but we only have an obesity epidemic here.</p><p>With diet as with other behavior, one  of the most effective ways to encourage responsible behavior, by individuals or corporations, is to internalize economic externalities.  That is, make the price paid by the individual (person or corporation) be the true cost.  For example, if corporations pollute the air when manufacturing, then they are messing up your air and not paying for it.   Charge for air pollution and two things happen: It becomes more profitable to pollute less and the victims of air pollution are compensated.  People complain about the "Tragedy of the Commons."  Well internalizing economic externalities is what fixes that.   Making people pay costs for their decisions encourages responsible decisions.</p><p>Socializing costs, that is, externalizing internalities by distributing the costs of individual's actions over everyone encourages irresponsible behavior.  Socializing costs is a tragedy, known in fact at the "Tragedy of the Commons." Individuals act irresponsibly when insulated from the costs of their own decisions, because those costs are paid by everyone and reduced to the individual.</p><p>So here is the thing.  Government policy in the United States is designed to promote obesity by socializing the costs of obesity.  The first cost is the food itself, which the government pays for in the forms of, to name two, food stamps and the earned income tax credit.  Everyone in the United States is required, by law, to pay for food to feed fat people. Really.  The second cost of obesity, greatly increased medical care, is now socialized as well.  Those costs could be reflected immediately to the individual in the price of insurance when the insurance market is deregulated and insurers are permitted to charge fatties more.   If all those fatties had to pay for their food and pay more for health insurance then their would be a lot fewer fatties.  Instead, now, a person who eats responsibly and exercises and who will require far less medical treatment as a result will pay the same amount for medical insurance as they guy who eats two dozen doughnuts for breakfast.</p><p>Telling people to eat less does not make them eat less.  Making them pay the price for overeating does. After passage of a multi-trillion-dollar bill which sponsors obesity, somewhere down the road Congress will spend billions to create and expand government agencies staffed with overpaid unionized employees  paid to tell people not to stuff themselves full of government sponsored food.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fat addiction is not sufficient to explain the United States obesity epidemic because fats are just as addictive in Sweden , Japan and Uruguay as they are in the United States but we only have an obesity epidemic here.With diet as with other behavior , one of the most effective ways to encourage responsible behavior , by individuals or corporations , is to internalize economic externalities .
That is , make the price paid by the individual ( person or corporation ) be the true cost .
For example , if corporations pollute the air when manufacturing , then they are messing up your air and not paying for it .
Charge for air pollution and two things happen : It becomes more profitable to pollute less and the victims of air pollution are compensated .
People complain about the " Tragedy of the Commons .
" Well internalizing economic externalities is what fixes that .
Making people pay costs for their decisions encourages responsible decisions.Socializing costs , that is , externalizing internalities by distributing the costs of individual 's actions over everyone encourages irresponsible behavior .
Socializing costs is a tragedy , known in fact at the " Tragedy of the Commons .
" Individuals act irresponsibly when insulated from the costs of their own decisions , because those costs are paid by everyone and reduced to the individual.So here is the thing .
Government policy in the United States is designed to promote obesity by socializing the costs of obesity .
The first cost is the food itself , which the government pays for in the forms of , to name two , food stamps and the earned income tax credit .
Everyone in the United States is required , by law , to pay for food to feed fat people .
Really. The second cost of obesity , greatly increased medical care , is now socialized as well .
Those costs could be reflected immediately to the individual in the price of insurance when the insurance market is deregulated and insurers are permitted to charge fatties more .
If all those fatties had to pay for their food and pay more for health insurance then their would be a lot fewer fatties .
Instead , now , a person who eats responsibly and exercises and who will require far less medical treatment as a result will pay the same amount for medical insurance as they guy who eats two dozen doughnuts for breakfast.Telling people to eat less does not make them eat less .
Making them pay the price for overeating does .
After passage of a multi-trillion-dollar bill which sponsors obesity , somewhere down the road Congress will spend billions to create and expand government agencies staffed with overpaid unionized employees paid to tell people not to stuff themselves full of government sponsored food .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fat addiction is not sufficient to explain the United States obesity epidemic because fats are just as addictive in Sweden, Japan and Uruguay as they are in the United States but we only have an obesity epidemic here.With diet as with other behavior, one  of the most effective ways to encourage responsible behavior, by individuals or corporations, is to internalize economic externalities.
That is, make the price paid by the individual (person or corporation) be the true cost.
For example, if corporations pollute the air when manufacturing, then they are messing up your air and not paying for it.
Charge for air pollution and two things happen: It becomes more profitable to pollute less and the victims of air pollution are compensated.
People complain about the "Tragedy of the Commons.
"  Well internalizing economic externalities is what fixes that.
Making people pay costs for their decisions encourages responsible decisions.Socializing costs, that is, externalizing internalities by distributing the costs of individual's actions over everyone encourages irresponsible behavior.
Socializing costs is a tragedy, known in fact at the "Tragedy of the Commons.
" Individuals act irresponsibly when insulated from the costs of their own decisions, because those costs are paid by everyone and reduced to the individual.So here is the thing.
Government policy in the United States is designed to promote obesity by socializing the costs of obesity.
The first cost is the food itself, which the government pays for in the forms of, to name two, food stamps and the earned income tax credit.
Everyone in the United States is required, by law, to pay for food to feed fat people.
Really.  The second cost of obesity, greatly increased medical care, is now socialized as well.
Those costs could be reflected immediately to the individual in the price of insurance when the insurance market is deregulated and insurers are permitted to charge fatties more.
If all those fatties had to pay for their food and pay more for health insurance then their would be a lot fewer fatties.
Instead, now, a person who eats responsibly and exercises and who will require far less medical treatment as a result will pay the same amount for medical insurance as they guy who eats two dozen doughnuts for breakfast.Telling people to eat less does not make them eat less.
Making them pay the price for overeating does.
After passage of a multi-trillion-dollar bill which sponsors obesity, somewhere down the road Congress will spend billions to create and expand government agencies staffed with overpaid unionized employees  paid to tell people not to stuff themselves full of government sponsored food.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655888</id>
	<title>Availability</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269871620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are also much easier to obtain than cocaine and cost less.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are also much easier to obtain than cocaine and cost less .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are also much easier to obtain than cocaine and cost less.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656960</id>
	<title>Long known -- Pritikin still right.</title>
	<author>S1mon\_Jester</author>
	<datestamp>1269876840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google Pritikin Diet.  Read a little.  This was researched long ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google Pritikin Diet .
Read a little .
This was researched long ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google Pritikin Diet.
Read a little.
This was researched long ago.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656906</id>
	<title>Don't blame fatty foods</title>
	<author>wcrowe</author>
	<datestamp>1269876600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Although the junk food mentioned is generally high in fat, they are also usually extremely high in carbohydrates too.  Some researchers believe that it is the high level of carbohydrates (perhaps in conjunction with the fat) that makes these foods addictive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Although the junk food mentioned is generally high in fat , they are also usually extremely high in carbohydrates too .
Some researchers believe that it is the high level of carbohydrates ( perhaps in conjunction with the fat ) that makes these foods addictive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although the junk food mentioned is generally high in fat, they are also usually extremely high in carbohydrates too.
Some researchers believe that it is the high level of carbohydrates (perhaps in conjunction with the fat) that makes these foods addictive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656504</id>
	<title>Heh...</title>
	<author>EFGearman</author>
	<datestamp>1269874800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This explains my chip addiction.  Thanks, Frito-Lay!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This explains my chip addiction .
Thanks , Frito-Lay !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This explains my chip addiction.
Thanks, Frito-Lay!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655972</id>
	<title>Yeah, I can see that...</title>
	<author>MikeRT</author>
	<datestamp>1269872220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They taste a lot better most of the time than stuff that is good for you without qualification. That keeps your brain cookin with pleasure-inducing chemistry.</p><p>The one thing about these foods that I don't agree with is that the poor need to eat them because they can't afford food that is good for them. That's a load of rubbish. My wife has been able to buy enough good, canned vegetables like beans, chickpeas and corn to feed a family of four for at least a week for $50. You can do a lot with those staples if you try.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They taste a lot better most of the time than stuff that is good for you without qualification .
That keeps your brain cookin with pleasure-inducing chemistry.The one thing about these foods that I do n't agree with is that the poor need to eat them because they ca n't afford food that is good for them .
That 's a load of rubbish .
My wife has been able to buy enough good , canned vegetables like beans , chickpeas and corn to feed a family of four for at least a week for $ 50 .
You can do a lot with those staples if you try .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They taste a lot better most of the time than stuff that is good for you without qualification.
That keeps your brain cookin with pleasure-inducing chemistry.The one thing about these foods that I don't agree with is that the poor need to eat them because they can't afford food that is good for them.
That's a load of rubbish.
My wife has been able to buy enough good, canned vegetables like beans, chickpeas and corn to feed a family of four for at least a week for $50.
You can do a lot with those staples if you try.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656676</id>
	<title>Re:Headlines like that are not helping obese peopl</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269875400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, all fat people act, behave, and interpret information the exact same way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , all fat people act , behave , and interpret information the exact same way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, all fat people act, behave, and interpret information the exact same way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31660690</id>
	<title>Re:Now the question regards addiction strength.</title>
	<author>the\_womble</author>
	<datestamp>1269892920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually this says nothing about fatty foods. The rats were fed a mixture of fatty and sugary food: it could just as easily be the sugar that was addictive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually this says nothing about fatty foods .
The rats were fed a mixture of fatty and sugary food : it could just as easily be the sugar that was addictive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually this says nothing about fatty foods.
The rats were fed a mixture of fatty and sugary food: it could just as easily be the sugar that was addictive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656308</id>
	<title>Re:OK, so now...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269873960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>not the same thing. drug addicts are usually slender.</p><p>fat people are all ugly all the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>not the same thing .
drug addicts are usually slender.fat people are all ugly all the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not the same thing.
drug addicts are usually slender.fat people are all ugly all the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656708</id>
	<title>Re:OK, so now...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269875580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ever almost run over a runner because he ran out from behind a truck right in front of your car and he didn't even realize he almost died? That's because he IS a drug addict. The "runner's high" kicks in when the pain does and your body produces endorphins. The only reason morphine and heroin work is because they fit the endorphin receptors. Since the health nut's mantra is "no pain, no gain" I suspect that all people who exersize for the sake of exercise are endorphin addicts.</p><p>And, I'm thin and get little exercise (I like walking, that's about it) and eat more than most obese people. So you can't judge by appearances.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ever almost run over a runner because he ran out from behind a truck right in front of your car and he did n't even realize he almost died ?
That 's because he IS a drug addict .
The " runner 's high " kicks in when the pain does and your body produces endorphins .
The only reason morphine and heroin work is because they fit the endorphin receptors .
Since the health nut 's mantra is " no pain , no gain " I suspect that all people who exersize for the sake of exercise are endorphin addicts.And , I 'm thin and get little exercise ( I like walking , that 's about it ) and eat more than most obese people .
So you ca n't judge by appearances .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ever almost run over a runner because he ran out from behind a truck right in front of your car and he didn't even realize he almost died?
That's because he IS a drug addict.
The "runner's high" kicks in when the pain does and your body produces endorphins.
The only reason morphine and heroin work is because they fit the endorphin receptors.
Since the health nut's mantra is "no pain, no gain" I suspect that all people who exersize for the sake of exercise are endorphin addicts.And, I'm thin and get little exercise (I like walking, that's about it) and eat more than most obese people.
So you can't judge by appearances.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31660028</id>
	<title>Re:OK, so now...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269889800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And I have even less respect for you. (Hint: publicly announcing your lack of respect for other human beings -- who have done you absolutely no wrong -- automatically cancels my respect for you.)</p><p>Really, what exactly did you gain from that mindless insult? "Look at me, I'm announcing my lack of respect for others! Put me on your 'cool' list!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I have even less respect for you .
( Hint : publicly announcing your lack of respect for other human beings -- who have done you absolutely no wrong -- automatically cancels my respect for you .
) Really , what exactly did you gain from that mindless insult ?
" Look at me , I 'm announcing my lack of respect for others !
Put me on your 'cool ' list !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I have even less respect for you.
(Hint: publicly announcing your lack of respect for other human beings -- who have done you absolutely no wrong -- automatically cancels my respect for you.
)Really, what exactly did you gain from that mindless insult?
"Look at me, I'm announcing my lack of respect for others!
Put me on your 'cool' list!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655848</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31665824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31666848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31684566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656676
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31660690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31659080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31659274
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656914
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658692
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31659170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31659474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31668556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656480
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31666904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31660028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656532
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656708
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657340
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31667358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31668538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31660704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31684602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656346
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31661210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658554
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_29_1241212_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31660602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655876
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31667358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658000
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31665824
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655888
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656532
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656164
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31660028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658692
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31660602
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655994
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31660704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657012
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31684602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31660690
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656172
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31661210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31666904
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656480
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31684566
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31668538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657414
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31668556
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656108
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658148
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657912
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656676
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31659080
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655818
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658952
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656874
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658536
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655852
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31659170
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31659274
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656070
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31666848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656914
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31659474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657850
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31657004
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656932
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656120
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655962
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656214
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31660826
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656364
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31656346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31658554
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_29_1241212.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_29_1241212.31655878
</commentlist>
</conversation>
