<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_26_1427217</id>
	<title>College To Save Money By Switching Email Font</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1269620460000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>The University of Wisconsin-Green Bay has come up with an unusual way of saving money: <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100326/ap\_on\_fe\_st/us\_odd\_cheaper\_e\_mail\_font">changing their email font</a>. The school expects to use 30\% less ink by switching from Arial to Century Gothic. From the article: "Diane Blohowiak is the school's director of computing. She says the new font uses about 30 percent less ink than the previous one. That could add up to real savings, since the cost of printer ink works out to about $10,000 per gallon. Blohowiak says the decision is part of the school's five-year plan to go green. She tells Wisconsin Public Radio it's great that a change that's eco-friendly also saves money."</htmltext>
<tokenext>The University of Wisconsin-Green Bay has come up with an unusual way of saving money : changing their email font .
The school expects to use 30 \ % less ink by switching from Arial to Century Gothic .
From the article : " Diane Blohowiak is the school 's director of computing .
She says the new font uses about 30 percent less ink than the previous one .
That could add up to real savings , since the cost of printer ink works out to about $ 10,000 per gallon .
Blohowiak says the decision is part of the school 's five-year plan to go green .
She tells Wisconsin Public Radio it 's great that a change that 's eco-friendly also saves money .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The University of Wisconsin-Green Bay has come up with an unusual way of saving money: changing their email font.
The school expects to use 30\% less ink by switching from Arial to Century Gothic.
From the article: "Diane Blohowiak is the school's director of computing.
She says the new font uses about 30 percent less ink than the previous one.
That could add up to real savings, since the cost of printer ink works out to about $10,000 per gallon.
Blohowiak says the decision is part of the school's five-year plan to go green.
She tells Wisconsin Public Radio it's great that a change that's eco-friendly also saves money.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628488</id>
	<title>Re:Why not laser print?</title>
	<author>BarryJacobsen</author>
	<datestamp>1269626280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For text based websites there's instapaper.com - you use a bookmarklet on the website you want to send to the device (it's even easier than del.icio.us - it doesn't ask you any questions, it just does it).</htmltext>
<tokenext>For text based websites there 's instapaper.com - you use a bookmarklet on the website you want to send to the device ( it 's even easier than del.icio.us - it does n't ask you any questions , it just does it ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For text based websites there's instapaper.com - you use a bookmarklet on the website you want to send to the device (it's even easier than del.icio.us - it doesn't ask you any questions, it just does it).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628474</id>
	<title>Re:.sig files...</title>
	<author>beakerMeep</author>
	<datestamp>1269626220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Agreed
<br> <br>
 

=========<br>
Beaker Meep Esq <br>
Vice President of Product Testing and Evanglising Evanagalist<br>
Honey Doo Industries L.L.C<br>
1 Muppet Lane<br>
Hensonville, USA 31337<br>
Beaker@HoneyDooIndustriesLLC.com<br>
<a href="http://www.honeydooindustriesllc.com/" title="honeydooin...iesllc.com">http://www.honeydooindustriesllc.com/</a> [honeydooin...iesllc.com] <br>
Twitter: @MeepMeepMeep<br>
Facebook: IHateHoneyDooMeep<br>
Tumblr: MeepMeepMeepMeeepMeep.meep<br>
MySpace:MeepItLikeYoMotherMadeYa<br>
Friendster: Meep<br>
Orkut: MeepMeep

<br> <br>
All text available from this post is copyright protected &#169; 2000-2010 by Beaker the Muppet Meep.  Unless stated otherwise, all text is provided free of charge. All text is provided on an "as is" basis without warranty of any kind, express or implied.

Under no circumstances and under no legal theory, whether in tort, contract, or otherwise, shall Beaker the Muppet Meep, or Bunsen Honeydoo be liable to you or to any other person for any indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any character including, without limitation, damages for loss of goodwill, work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or for any and all other damages or losses. If you do not agree with these terms, then you are advised not to read.
<br> <br>
Please consider the environment before reading all this drivel.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed = = = = = = = = = Beaker Meep Esq Vice President of Product Testing and Evanglising Evanagalist Honey Doo Industries L.L.C 1 Muppet Lane Hensonville , USA 31337 Beaker @ HoneyDooIndustriesLLC.com http : //www.honeydooindustriesllc.com/ [ honeydooin...iesllc.com ] Twitter : @ MeepMeepMeep Facebook : IHateHoneyDooMeep Tumblr : MeepMeepMeepMeeepMeep.meep MySpace : MeepItLikeYoMotherMadeYa Friendster : Meep Orkut : MeepMeep All text available from this post is copyright protected   2000-2010 by Beaker the Muppet Meep .
Unless stated otherwise , all text is provided free of charge .
All text is provided on an " as is " basis without warranty of any kind , express or implied .
Under no circumstances and under no legal theory , whether in tort , contract , or otherwise , shall Beaker the Muppet Meep , or Bunsen Honeydoo be liable to you or to any other person for any indirect , special , incidental , or consequential damages of any character including , without limitation , damages for loss of goodwill , work stoppage , computer failure or malfunction , or for any and all other damages or losses .
If you do not agree with these terms , then you are advised not to read .
Please consider the environment before reading all this drivel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed
 
 

=========
Beaker Meep Esq 
Vice President of Product Testing and Evanglising Evanagalist
Honey Doo Industries L.L.C
1 Muppet Lane
Hensonville, USA 31337
Beaker@HoneyDooIndustriesLLC.com
http://www.honeydooindustriesllc.com/ [honeydooin...iesllc.com] 
Twitter: @MeepMeepMeep
Facebook: IHateHoneyDooMeep
Tumblr: MeepMeepMeepMeeepMeep.meep
MySpace:MeepItLikeYoMotherMadeYa
Friendster: Meep
Orkut: MeepMeep

 
All text available from this post is copyright protected © 2000-2010 by Beaker the Muppet Meep.
Unless stated otherwise, all text is provided free of charge.
All text is provided on an "as is" basis without warranty of any kind, express or implied.
Under no circumstances and under no legal theory, whether in tort, contract, or otherwise, shall Beaker the Muppet Meep, or Bunsen Honeydoo be liable to you or to any other person for any indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any character including, without limitation, damages for loss of goodwill, work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or for any and all other damages or losses.
If you do not agree with these terms, then you are advised not to read.
Please consider the environment before reading all this drivel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627750</id>
	<title>Another idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269624180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You could also just tell people to stop printing out their emails.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You could also just tell people to stop printing out their emails .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could also just tell people to stop printing out their emails.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630276</id>
	<title>Re:Printer Ink?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269632280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cost of sending HTML?  You sound like the people who save $.0001 by driving in the twilight with only their parking lights on while risking a $20,000 accident.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cost of sending HTML ?
You sound like the people who save $ .0001 by driving in the twilight with only their parking lights on while risking a $ 20,000 accident .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cost of sending HTML?
You sound like the people who save $.0001 by driving in the twilight with only their parking lights on while risking a $20,000 accident.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629136</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269628320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Only if people are printing emails...</p></div><p>And for those who insist on printing emails there are the EcoFonts. "Offers a free font based on Bitstream Vera sans-serif containing little holes and designed to reduce ink consumption when printing." www.ecofont.com</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Only if people are printing emails...And for those who insist on printing emails there are the EcoFonts .
" Offers a free font based on Bitstream Vera sans-serif containing little holes and designed to reduce ink consumption when printing .
" www.ecofont.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only if people are printing emails...And for those who insist on printing emails there are the EcoFonts.
"Offers a free font based on Bitstream Vera sans-serif containing little holes and designed to reduce ink consumption when printing.
" www.ecofont.com
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628368</id>
	<title>Wait...</title>
	<author>EEBaum</author>
	<datestamp>1269625860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>...email has fonts?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...email has fonts ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...email has fonts?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628014</id>
	<title>Re:Ah</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269624900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really?  I would have never guessed that you have to turn in papers at a university.  Who knew?<br>Now if only I could figure out why I'm printing out EMAILS and how that relates a single bit to turning in these paper things you're banging on about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
I would have never guessed that you have to turn in papers at a university .
Who knew ? Now if only I could figure out why I 'm printing out EMAILS and how that relates a single bit to turning in these paper things you 're banging on about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
I would have never guessed that you have to turn in papers at a university.
Who knew?Now if only I could figure out why I'm printing out EMAILS and how that relates a single bit to turning in these paper things you're banging on about.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628160</id>
	<title>Re:Ah</title>
	<author>Kielistic</author>
	<datestamp>1269625260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm trying very hard to understand what turning in papers has to do with email fonts.  Have you confused your email client as a word processor?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm trying very hard to understand what turning in papers has to do with email fonts .
Have you confused your email client as a word processor ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm trying very hard to understand what turning in papers has to do with email fonts.
Have you confused your email client as a word processor?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31644920</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269709080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The idea of duplicates in your situation is well understood. The same may not be the case in other professions but, yea, it really is (was) in your case. This also goes for other scenarios for which many of us have run into ourselves. Common sense and a moderate belief in corruption (existing everywhere you go) also helps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The idea of duplicates in your situation is well understood .
The same may not be the case in other professions but , yea , it really is ( was ) in your case .
This also goes for other scenarios for which many of us have run into ourselves .
Common sense and a moderate belief in corruption ( existing everywhere you go ) also helps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The idea of duplicates in your situation is well understood.
The same may not be the case in other professions but, yea, it really is (was) in your case.
This also goes for other scenarios for which many of us have run into ourselves.
Common sense and a moderate belief in corruption (existing everywhere you go) also helps.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31631302</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269636420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is a printed hardcopy without a signature any type of proof that the email existed?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is a printed hardcopy without a signature any type of proof that the email existed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is a printed hardcopy without a signature any type of proof that the email existed?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31640994</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>fatalfury</author>
	<datestamp>1269715380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You might be surprised how many emails get printed. Non-computer savvy people love to print emails. It's such a costly issue that a new signature has been catching on in my office that reads "Please think of the environment before you print this email."</htmltext>
<tokenext>You might be surprised how many emails get printed .
Non-computer savvy people love to print emails .
It 's such a costly issue that a new signature has been catching on in my office that reads " Please think of the environment before you print this email .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You might be surprised how many emails get printed.
Non-computer savvy people love to print emails.
It's such a costly issue that a new signature has been catching on in my office that reads "Please think of the environment before you print this email.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628950</id>
	<title>Just say no</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269627720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just say no to printing email. This saves 100\%. Gee whiz kid!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just say no to printing email .
This saves 100 \ % .
Gee whiz kid !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just say no to printing email.
This saves 100\%.
Gee whiz kid!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629688</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>PatHMV</author>
	<datestamp>1269630180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not nearly as stupid as it sounds! Years ago, I was an assistant prosecutor. On my first day, somebody told me horror stories about a previous DA. The first lesson you learned was, when the DA told you to dismiss somebody's DUI charge, get the order in writing. The SECOND lesson you learned was, make a copy of that writing and take it home and lock it in your safe.

The boss man is ALWAYS in ultimate control of the contents of the office computer system. If he wants to make an e-mail disappear (for all practical purposes, short of a lawsuit and discovery ordered by a judge in a lawsuit), he can.

Now, triplicate is a bit much, and I'd be more selective about which e-mails I really need hard copies of, but the idea of printing out the e-mail and taking it home so nobody can accuse you later of having acted on your own? That's just a good idea.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not nearly as stupid as it sounds !
Years ago , I was an assistant prosecutor .
On my first day , somebody told me horror stories about a previous DA .
The first lesson you learned was , when the DA told you to dismiss somebody 's DUI charge , get the order in writing .
The SECOND lesson you learned was , make a copy of that writing and take it home and lock it in your safe .
The boss man is ALWAYS in ultimate control of the contents of the office computer system .
If he wants to make an e-mail disappear ( for all practical purposes , short of a lawsuit and discovery ordered by a judge in a lawsuit ) , he can .
Now , triplicate is a bit much , and I 'd be more selective about which e-mails I really need hard copies of , but the idea of printing out the e-mail and taking it home so nobody can accuse you later of having acted on your own ?
That 's just a good idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not nearly as stupid as it sounds!
Years ago, I was an assistant prosecutor.
On my first day, somebody told me horror stories about a previous DA.
The first lesson you learned was, when the DA told you to dismiss somebody's DUI charge, get the order in writing.
The SECOND lesson you learned was, make a copy of that writing and take it home and lock it in your safe.
The boss man is ALWAYS in ultimate control of the contents of the office computer system.
If he wants to make an e-mail disappear (for all practical purposes, short of a lawsuit and discovery ordered by a judge in a lawsuit), he can.
Now, triplicate is a bit much, and I'd be more selective about which e-mails I really need hard copies of, but the idea of printing out the e-mail and taking it home so nobody can accuse you later of having acted on your own?
That's just a good idea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632796</id>
	<title>Re:Why not use Ecofont?</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1269599220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sort of, with smaller fonts and a not super accurate printer the font doesn't look like that. With that said, the idea of using less darkness is probably way easier.... grayscale fonts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sort of , with smaller fonts and a not super accurate printer the font does n't look like that .
With that said , the idea of using less darkness is probably way easier.... grayscale fonts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sort of, with smaller fonts and a not super accurate printer the font doesn't look like that.
With that said, the idea of using less darkness is probably way easier.... grayscale fonts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628604</id>
	<title>Re:Not a bad idea...</title>
	<author>ClickOnThis</author>
	<datestamp>1269626700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...if only for the fact that Century Gothic <a href="http://imgur.com/1bDHo.png" title="imgur.com">looks better</a> [imgur.com] than Arial.</p></div><p>Uh...the link displays a 1x1-pixel png, and what's more, I think it's white.  So they certainly would save ink using a font like this.</p><p>(Did something just go "whoosh" over my head?)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...if only for the fact that Century Gothic looks better [ imgur.com ] than Arial.Uh...the link displays a 1x1-pixel png , and what 's more , I think it 's white .
So they certainly would save ink using a font like this .
( Did something just go " whoosh " over my head ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...if only for the fact that Century Gothic looks better [imgur.com] than Arial.Uh...the link displays a 1x1-pixel png, and what's more, I think it's white.
So they certainly would save ink using a font like this.
(Did something just go "whoosh" over my head?
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630690</id>
	<title>Also</title>
	<author>TRRosen</author>
	<datestamp>1269634020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They also are trying to save paper by getting students to use both sides when printing eBooks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They also are trying to save paper by getting students to use both sides when printing eBooks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They also are trying to save paper by getting students to use both sides when printing eBooks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628022</id>
	<title>Safe more.</title>
	<author>leuk\_he</author>
	<datestamp>1269624900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is even very simple to sfe 20\% more with a <a href="http://www.techsweek.com/2008/12/the-eco-friendly-font-ecofont/" title="techsweek.com" rel="nofollow">Eco font</a> [techsweek.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is even very simple to sfe 20 \ % more with a Eco font [ techsweek.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is even very simple to sfe 20\% more with a Eco font [techsweek.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629438</id>
	<title>Century Gothic is wider at same font size</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269629400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hence it takes up more space.</p><p>I sure hope they took the cost of paper into account.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hence it takes up more space.I sure hope they took the cost of paper into account .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hence it takes up more space.I sure hope they took the cost of paper into account.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630986</id>
	<title>Re:Wait...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269635280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628368</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627746</id>
	<title>Heres an idea...</title>
	<author>epdp14</author>
	<datestamp>1269624180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>E-mail should stay on e-lectronic media! Unless there is a genuine purpose to have a printed copy of an email, don't print it. Digital archives are much more cost effective than that overflowing file cabinet anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>E-mail should stay on e-lectronic media !
Unless there is a genuine purpose to have a printed copy of an email , do n't print it .
Digital archives are much more cost effective than that overflowing file cabinet anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>E-mail should stay on e-lectronic media!
Unless there is a genuine purpose to have a printed copy of an email, don't print it.
Digital archives are much more cost effective than that overflowing file cabinet anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628614</id>
	<title>Another thought</title>
	<author>carlhaagen</author>
	<datestamp>1269626700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They could go down a point (or pixel) in font size, too. Something else noteworthy is that most characters in Century Gothic, of same height as same character in Arial, is wider, thus requiring more paper per letter, per word, per sentence - their cost cutting might end up a null result.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They could go down a point ( or pixel ) in font size , too .
Something else noteworthy is that most characters in Century Gothic , of same height as same character in Arial , is wider , thus requiring more paper per letter , per word , per sentence - their cost cutting might end up a null result .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They could go down a point (or pixel) in font size, too.
Something else noteworthy is that most characters in Century Gothic, of same height as same character in Arial, is wider, thus requiring more paper per letter, per word, per sentence - their cost cutting might end up a null result.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628148</id>
	<title>ColorQube</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269625260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about getting rid of the 200 individual inkjets and getting several centralized solid ink Xerox ColorQubes for example. Makes more "cents" if you ask me... might help cure a small percentage of over-weight people by forcing them to walk 5 doors down to pickup their printed pages too<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about getting rid of the 200 individual inkjets and getting several centralized solid ink Xerox ColorQubes for example .
Makes more " cents " if you ask me... might help cure a small percentage of over-weight people by forcing them to walk 5 doors down to pickup their printed pages too : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about getting rid of the 200 individual inkjets and getting several centralized solid ink Xerox ColorQubes for example.
Makes more "cents" if you ask me... might help cure a small percentage of over-weight people by forcing them to walk 5 doors down to pickup their printed pages too :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628760</id>
	<title>Re:Heres an idea...</title>
	<author>rickb928</author>
	<datestamp>1269627240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Unless there is a genuine purpose to have a printed copy of an email, don't print it"</p><p>Excellent advice.  Redundant, and reinforcing the college's solution, but excellent.</p><p>Just a quick question, are you a Linux user?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Unless there is a genuine purpose to have a printed copy of an email , do n't print it " Excellent advice .
Redundant , and reinforcing the college 's solution , but excellent.Just a quick question , are you a Linux user ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Unless there is a genuine purpose to have a printed copy of an email, don't print it"Excellent advice.
Redundant, and reinforcing the college's solution, but excellent.Just a quick question, are you a Linux user?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629420</id>
	<title>Re:disclaimer: in the industry</title>
	<author>Dragee</author>
	<datestamp>1269629340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm inclined to doubt that the students are the ones printing most of their emails.  In my experience, it's usually the older generation(s) that seem to want to print everything, so it's probably faculty/professors printing out every damn thing.  I have two theories on this:
<p>
1) Younger people are still more used to digesting content directly from an electronic screen, so they don't feel a need to convert it to dead-tree form for a more "natural" medium.
</p><p>
2) Younger people are probably more likely to trust that the email will still be there*, and they are able to use search tools to find it, whereas older generations may feel (even subconsciously) that if they don't print it out and put it in their hard-copy filing system, they may not have access to it again.  I think the only reason my mother has cut down on her printing of every "interesting" email is that she has spammed herself into oblivion with mailing lists &amp; such, to the point that printing everything would be cost prohibitive.
</p><p>
*Assuming there's not a ridiculous "all email will be deleted within 90 days, and no archiving or auto-forwarding allowed" policy, like with my employer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm inclined to doubt that the students are the ones printing most of their emails .
In my experience , it 's usually the older generation ( s ) that seem to want to print everything , so it 's probably faculty/professors printing out every damn thing .
I have two theories on this : 1 ) Younger people are still more used to digesting content directly from an electronic screen , so they do n't feel a need to convert it to dead-tree form for a more " natural " medium .
2 ) Younger people are probably more likely to trust that the email will still be there * , and they are able to use search tools to find it , whereas older generations may feel ( even subconsciously ) that if they do n't print it out and put it in their hard-copy filing system , they may not have access to it again .
I think the only reason my mother has cut down on her printing of every " interesting " email is that she has spammed herself into oblivion with mailing lists &amp; such , to the point that printing everything would be cost prohibitive .
* Assuming there 's not a ridiculous " all email will be deleted within 90 days , and no archiving or auto-forwarding allowed " policy , like with my employer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm inclined to doubt that the students are the ones printing most of their emails.
In my experience, it's usually the older generation(s) that seem to want to print everything, so it's probably faculty/professors printing out every damn thing.
I have two theories on this:

1) Younger people are still more used to digesting content directly from an electronic screen, so they don't feel a need to convert it to dead-tree form for a more "natural" medium.
2) Younger people are probably more likely to trust that the email will still be there*, and they are able to use search tools to find it, whereas older generations may feel (even subconsciously) that if they don't print it out and put it in their hard-copy filing system, they may not have access to it again.
I think the only reason my mother has cut down on her printing of every "interesting" email is that she has spammed herself into oblivion with mailing lists &amp; such, to the point that printing everything would be cost prohibitive.
*Assuming there's not a ridiculous "all email will be deleted within 90 days, and no archiving or auto-forwarding allowed" policy, like with my employer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628444</id>
	<title>Re:Why not laser print?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269626160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is probably very close to the truth. The people in question are probably professors, and the way internal politics works in most Universities (I have worked for 3) the professors have most of the power. Since they all want a personal printer, they all get one, but they are the ones in charge of the budget and there is no way they are going to buy a laser printer when they could buy a cheaper inkjet (since "it is almost free"). Since the ink often comes out of a budget that is not theirs (at least not directly), they don't care about on-going costs (nor were they really going to think about them in the first place).</p><p>And the professors in question are often older (this affects both eyesight, and comfort with technology), and they are often getting email that needs to be marked up (notes on scientific papers, reviews of their post-doc's work, etc...), and you find that they get in the habit of printing out everything. There are some who are moving to a mostly-digital workflow, but the tools for this are still specialized or not well known in the community (they are just learning about how to use editing notes in Word).</p><p>In most Universities the local IT has no power to change any of these, and has to walk a lot of very fine lines politically (while being underpaid for even the normal job). Central IT often can put out edicts, since people there have the ear of the dean, but localized IT has both the responsibility to enforce these edicts, and none of the power to do so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is probably very close to the truth .
The people in question are probably professors , and the way internal politics works in most Universities ( I have worked for 3 ) the professors have most of the power .
Since they all want a personal printer , they all get one , but they are the ones in charge of the budget and there is no way they are going to buy a laser printer when they could buy a cheaper inkjet ( since " it is almost free " ) .
Since the ink often comes out of a budget that is not theirs ( at least not directly ) , they do n't care about on-going costs ( nor were they really going to think about them in the first place ) .And the professors in question are often older ( this affects both eyesight , and comfort with technology ) , and they are often getting email that needs to be marked up ( notes on scientific papers , reviews of their post-doc 's work , etc... ) , and you find that they get in the habit of printing out everything .
There are some who are moving to a mostly-digital workflow , but the tools for this are still specialized or not well known in the community ( they are just learning about how to use editing notes in Word ) .In most Universities the local IT has no power to change any of these , and has to walk a lot of very fine lines politically ( while being underpaid for even the normal job ) .
Central IT often can put out edicts , since people there have the ear of the dean , but localized IT has both the responsibility to enforce these edicts , and none of the power to do so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is probably very close to the truth.
The people in question are probably professors, and the way internal politics works in most Universities (I have worked for 3) the professors have most of the power.
Since they all want a personal printer, they all get one, but they are the ones in charge of the budget and there is no way they are going to buy a laser printer when they could buy a cheaper inkjet (since "it is almost free").
Since the ink often comes out of a budget that is not theirs (at least not directly), they don't care about on-going costs (nor were they really going to think about them in the first place).And the professors in question are often older (this affects both eyesight, and comfort with technology), and they are often getting email that needs to be marked up (notes on scientific papers, reviews of their post-doc's work, etc...), and you find that they get in the habit of printing out everything.
There are some who are moving to a mostly-digital workflow, but the tools for this are still specialized or not well known in the community (they are just learning about how to use editing notes in Word).In most Universities the local IT has no power to change any of these, and has to walk a lot of very fine lines politically (while being underpaid for even the normal job).
Central IT often can put out edicts, since people there have the ear of the dean, but localized IT has both the responsibility to enforce these edicts, and none of the power to do so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628056</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269625020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In a perfect world no one would print emails, but having worked at a place that printing emails was a common occurrence this could save real money.  Just because something isn't the ideal doesn't mean it can't be better than the current reality.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In a perfect world no one would print emails , but having worked at a place that printing emails was a common occurrence this could save real money .
Just because something is n't the ideal does n't mean it ca n't be better than the current reality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a perfect world no one would print emails, but having worked at a place that printing emails was a common occurrence this could save real money.
Just because something isn't the ideal doesn't mean it can't be better than the current reality.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630392</id>
	<title>Better than that</title>
	<author>arielCo</author>
	<datestamp>1269632820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know how they do it, but <a href="http://www.ecofont.com/en/products/green/printing/environmentally-aware-printing-with-ecofont.html" title="ecofont.com">here</a> [ecofont.com] they say:<p><div class="quote"><p>4 )  In order to optimise the legibility of the printed text, we have set an Ecoprint range. Only text up to a particular point size &ndash; generally 11 points - is printed in the Ecofont font. Larger text is printed in the normal font.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know how they do it , but here [ ecofont.com ] they say : 4 ) In order to optimise the legibility of the printed text , we have set an Ecoprint range .
Only text up to a particular point size    generally 11 points - is printed in the Ecofont font .
Larger text is printed in the normal font .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know how they do it, but here [ecofont.com] they say:4 )  In order to optimise the legibility of the printed text, we have set an Ecoprint range.
Only text up to a particular point size – generally 11 points - is printed in the Ecofont font.
Larger text is printed in the normal font.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627756</id>
	<title>Why not laser print?</title>
	<author>Sporkinum</author>
	<datestamp>1269624180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who was the genius there that had them using ink jet printers instead of laser? Probably the same genius that thinks this will save them money?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who was the genius there that had them using ink jet printers instead of laser ?
Probably the same genius that thinks this will save them money ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who was the genius there that had them using ink jet printers instead of laser?
Probably the same genius that thinks this will save them money?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628804</id>
	<title>Re:.sig files...</title>
	<author>c++0xFF</author>
	<datestamp>1269627360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, I really hate that, too.</p><p>--<br>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>Version: 2.6.3a<br>Charset: noconv</p><p>iQCVAwUBMXVGMFIa2NdXHZJZAQFe4AQAz0FZrHdH8o+zkIvcI/4ABg4gfE7cG0xE<br>Z2J9GVWD2zi4tG+s1+IWEY6Ae17kx925JKrzF4Ti2upAwTN2Pnb/x0G8WJQVKQzP<br>mZcD+XNnAaYCqFz8iIuAFVLchYeWj1Pqxxq0weGCtjQIrpzrmGxV7xXzK0jus+6V<br>rML3TxQSwdA=<br>=T9Mc<br>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , I really hate that , too.-------BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----Version : 2.6.3aCharset : noconviQCVAwUBMXVGMFIa2NdXHZJZAQFe4AQAz0FZrHdH8o + zkIvcI/4ABg4gfE7cG0xEZ2J9GVWD2zi4tG + s1 + IWEY6Ae17kx925JKrzF4Ti2upAwTN2Pnb/x0G8WJQVKQzPmZcD + XNnAaYCqFz8iIuAFVLchYeWj1Pqxxq0weGCtjQIrpzrmGxV7xXzK0jus + 6VrML3TxQSwdA = = T9Mc-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, I really hate that, too.-------BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----Version: 2.6.3aCharset: noconviQCVAwUBMXVGMFIa2NdXHZJZAQFe4AQAz0FZrHdH8o+zkIvcI/4ABg4gfE7cG0xEZ2J9GVWD2zi4tG+s1+IWEY6Ae17kx925JKrzF4Ti2upAwTN2Pnb/x0G8WJQVKQzPmZcD+XNnAaYCqFz8iIuAFVLchYeWj1Pqxxq0weGCtjQIrpzrmGxV7xXzK0jus+6VrML3TxQSwdA==T9Mc-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629012</id>
	<title>Did you know</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269627960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that over half of the world's printer ink comes from squid farmers living on the island of Okinawa? The livelihood of these humble farmers is being threatened by The University of Wisconsin-Green Bay and other institutions who are choosing to "go green" by switching to Century Gothic. The bottom line is that Century Gothic KILLS JOBS.</p><p>Call Diane Blohowiak and give her this message:</p><p>Century Gothic: wrong for you, wrong for Okinawan squid farmers, wrong for America.</p><p>This message is brought to you by Arial Research Alliance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that over half of the world 's printer ink comes from squid farmers living on the island of Okinawa ?
The livelihood of these humble farmers is being threatened by The University of Wisconsin-Green Bay and other institutions who are choosing to " go green " by switching to Century Gothic .
The bottom line is that Century Gothic KILLS JOBS.Call Diane Blohowiak and give her this message : Century Gothic : wrong for you , wrong for Okinawan squid farmers , wrong for America.This message is brought to you by Arial Research Alliance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that over half of the world's printer ink comes from squid farmers living on the island of Okinawa?
The livelihood of these humble farmers is being threatened by The University of Wisconsin-Green Bay and other institutions who are choosing to "go green" by switching to Century Gothic.
The bottom line is that Century Gothic KILLS JOBS.Call Diane Blohowiak and give her this message:Century Gothic: wrong for you, wrong for Okinawan squid farmers, wrong for America.This message is brought to you by Arial Research Alliance.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628300</id>
	<title>Save even more</title>
	<author>davidbrit2</author>
	<datestamp>1269625680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Use 2pt white Arial Narrow, and you'll not only reduce your ink usage by nearly 100\%, but you'll save on paper too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Use 2pt white Arial Narrow , and you 'll not only reduce your ink usage by nearly 100 \ % , but you 'll save on paper too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Use 2pt white Arial Narrow, and you'll not only reduce your ink usage by nearly 100\%, but you'll save on paper too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627900</id>
	<title>Re:Ah</title>
	<author>quantumplacet</author>
	<datestamp>1269624600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ah, the real idiots of slashdot who try to attack commenters without even reading the fucking title, much less the summary or article.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ah , the real idiots of slashdot who try to attack commenters without even reading the fucking title , much less the summary or article .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ah, the real idiots of slashdot who try to attack commenters without even reading the fucking title, much less the summary or article.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628450</id>
	<title>Save even more money...</title>
	<author>rugatero</author>
	<datestamp>1269626160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They could save even more by changing the font colour to white.</p><p>But then some bright spark will suggest they need to order black paper so the white ink will show up, and they'll be out of pocket again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They could save even more by changing the font colour to white.But then some bright spark will suggest they need to order black paper so the white ink will show up , and they 'll be out of pocket again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They could save even more by changing the font colour to white.But then some bright spark will suggest they need to order black paper so the white ink will show up, and they'll be out of pocket again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632338</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>thrawn\_aj</author>
	<datestamp>1269597420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Social engineering of the best kind - try to change wrong attitudes but <i>not count on it</i>. Instead, make small changes that cause large positive outcomes <i>even if</i> people continue to act like idiots (regularly printing emails for instance). Kudos to UW.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Social engineering of the best kind - try to change wrong attitudes but not count on it .
Instead , make small changes that cause large positive outcomes even if people continue to act like idiots ( regularly printing emails for instance ) .
Kudos to UW .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Social engineering of the best kind - try to change wrong attitudes but not count on it.
Instead, make small changes that cause large positive outcomes even if people continue to act like idiots (regularly printing emails for instance).
Kudos to UW.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31633666</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>owlstead</author>
	<datestamp>1269603900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just forward such mails to a safe account. The level of trust of those accounts (e.g. Gmail) is about the same level - if not better - than those within the office.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just forward such mails to a safe account .
The level of trust of those accounts ( e.g .
Gmail ) is about the same level - if not better - than those within the office .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just forward such mails to a safe account.
The level of trust of those accounts (e.g.
Gmail) is about the same level - if not better - than those within the office.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629942</id>
	<title>Re:Why not use Ecofont?</title>
	<author>frank\_adrian314159</author>
	<datestamp>1269631020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not use it?</p><p>First, it's ugly.  I mean really, helvetic'ish ugly.  Second, the holes haven't been designed well - there's a high variability in color tone between the characters that gives an astigmatic dazzle effect and that make the text very fatiguing to read.  Third, it doesn't scale well - magnifying by 20\% increases the visibility of these flaws.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not use it ? First , it 's ugly .
I mean really , helvetic'ish ugly .
Second , the holes have n't been designed well - there 's a high variability in color tone between the characters that gives an astigmatic dazzle effect and that make the text very fatiguing to read .
Third , it does n't scale well - magnifying by 20 \ % increases the visibility of these flaws .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not use it?First, it's ugly.
I mean really, helvetic'ish ugly.
Second, the holes haven't been designed well - there's a high variability in color tone between the characters that gives an astigmatic dazzle effect and that make the text very fatiguing to read.
Third, it doesn't scale well - magnifying by 20\% increases the visibility of these flaws.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627994</id>
	<title>Re:Why not laser print?</title>
	<author>alen</author>
	<datestamp>1269624840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>when i did a year of consulting for a US Army agency years ago, it seemed like almost everyone wanted their own personal printer. most people thought they were too good to share a printer with the 50 other people on the floor. so they probably bought inkjets for all the cry babies who wanted their own printer</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>when i did a year of consulting for a US Army agency years ago , it seemed like almost everyone wanted their own personal printer .
most people thought they were too good to share a printer with the 50 other people on the floor .
so they probably bought inkjets for all the cry babies who wanted their own printer</tokentext>
<sentencetext>when i did a year of consulting for a US Army agency years ago, it seemed like almost everyone wanted their own personal printer.
most people thought they were too good to share a printer with the 50 other people on the floor.
so they probably bought inkjets for all the cry babies who wanted their own printer</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628540</id>
	<title>Re:disclaimer: in the industry</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1269626400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Secondly of all, give the students access to community laser printers.</p></div><p>In the early to mid 2000s, the community laser printers were black and white.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Secondly of all , give the students access to community laser printers.In the early to mid 2000s , the community laser printers were black and white .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Secondly of all, give the students access to community laser printers.In the early to mid 2000s, the community laser printers were black and white.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629376</id>
	<title>Re:.sig files...</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1269629220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><b>P</b> please consider the environment before printing this post.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>P please consider the environment before printing this post .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>P please consider the environment before printing this post.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630956</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>Foolomon</author>
	<datestamp>1269635100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And save electricity by not allowing the use of boldface, underline or strikethrough fonts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And save electricity by not allowing the use of boldface , underline or strikethrough fonts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And save electricity by not allowing the use of boldface, underline or strikethrough fonts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628230</id>
	<title>Re:Why not use Ecofont?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269625500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not just print in gray instead of black?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not just print in gray instead of black ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not just print in gray instead of black?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627760</id>
	<title>Or...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269624180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... you could stop printing emails?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... you could stop printing emails ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... you could stop printing emails?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629270</id>
	<title>Re:Ah</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269628800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I used to accept digital copies. I stopped, for a lot of reasons: unverifiable "I sent it, really, my email must not be working" excuses, file format incompatibilities, people emailing papers during the class sessions that they skipped so that they could finish them, etc.</p><p>The physical paper affords a lot of interactions as well - it's easy to gesture over a region of writing, circle it quickly, etc. Most digital versions of those gestures don't work (I could imagine - maybe - some of them working on a pad or tablet, but that's a stretch.) HCI research, trying to identify why an automation effort failed, observed the importance of physical writing in the care of hospital patients noted how much information was stored in the materials. Nurses could identify authors immediately from handwriting; density of writing often cued the dynamics of care; annotations connected writing to clarify the treatment plan, etc.</p><p>The biggest reason, however, is that I don't want to have to sit in an office to read and grade dozens of papers. I want to be able to do it on a plane, a train, a bus, on the beach, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to accept digital copies .
I stopped , for a lot of reasons : unverifiable " I sent it , really , my email must not be working " excuses , file format incompatibilities , people emailing papers during the class sessions that they skipped so that they could finish them , etc.The physical paper affords a lot of interactions as well - it 's easy to gesture over a region of writing , circle it quickly , etc .
Most digital versions of those gestures do n't work ( I could imagine - maybe - some of them working on a pad or tablet , but that 's a stretch .
) HCI research , trying to identify why an automation effort failed , observed the importance of physical writing in the care of hospital patients noted how much information was stored in the materials .
Nurses could identify authors immediately from handwriting ; density of writing often cued the dynamics of care ; annotations connected writing to clarify the treatment plan , etc.The biggest reason , however , is that I do n't want to have to sit in an office to read and grade dozens of papers .
I want to be able to do it on a plane , a train , a bus , on the beach , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to accept digital copies.
I stopped, for a lot of reasons: unverifiable "I sent it, really, my email must not be working" excuses, file format incompatibilities, people emailing papers during the class sessions that they skipped so that they could finish them, etc.The physical paper affords a lot of interactions as well - it's easy to gesture over a region of writing, circle it quickly, etc.
Most digital versions of those gestures don't work (I could imagine - maybe - some of them working on a pad or tablet, but that's a stretch.
) HCI research, trying to identify why an automation effort failed, observed the importance of physical writing in the care of hospital patients noted how much information was stored in the materials.
Nurses could identify authors immediately from handwriting; density of writing often cued the dynamics of care; annotations connected writing to clarify the treatment plan, etc.The biggest reason, however, is that I don't want to have to sit in an office to read and grade dozens of papers.
I want to be able to do it on a plane, a train, a bus, on the beach, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628084</id>
	<title>Re:Why not laser print?</title>
	<author>rolfwind</author>
	<datestamp>1269625080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is perhaps where something like an iPad could help go towards paperless... but like in Avatar, where they uplink to the bodies for the first time, the scientist slides what he is interested in off his main computer onto a slate, there needs to be tech that facilitates the exchange of "papers" the same way between devices.  Without thinking about it, mucking with file formats or email adresses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is perhaps where something like an iPad could help go towards paperless... but like in Avatar , where they uplink to the bodies for the first time , the scientist slides what he is interested in off his main computer onto a slate , there needs to be tech that facilitates the exchange of " papers " the same way between devices .
Without thinking about it , mucking with file formats or email adresses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is perhaps where something like an iPad could help go towards paperless... but like in Avatar, where they uplink to the bodies for the first time, the scientist slides what he is interested in off his main computer onto a slate, there needs to be tech that facilitates the exchange of "papers" the same way between devices.
Without thinking about it, mucking with file formats or email adresses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627850</id>
	<title>Printer Ink?</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1269624480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like buying a couple of laser printers would save them more money.  I wonder how much money they waste on email storage and bandwidth costs by sending HTML mail instead of plain text too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like buying a couple of laser printers would save them more money .
I wonder how much money they waste on email storage and bandwidth costs by sending HTML mail instead of plain text too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like buying a couple of laser printers would save them more money.
I wonder how much money they waste on email storage and bandwidth costs by sending HTML mail instead of plain text too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31653648</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>stuckinphp</author>
	<datestamp>1269801360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is wrong with printing emails. Sorry but the world is not full of freaky geeks like us. While computers, email and the "Internet" is common place these days. They aren't common everywhere, as you seem to think.</p><p>A builder, although may use a computer for billing his/her customers and what not. Probably doesn't want to bring their desktop to the 'office' to show his buds this sweet deal on a new tool chest he saw online.</p><p>A school, government funded. Probably does have a few computers, but one per teacher, one per student? Unlikely. Printing a time table out and putting it on a notice board somewhere is likely to be more effective.</p><p>Your idea of this world being a paperless one is very naive.</p><p>-------<br>To be more on topic:<br>I'm more concerned that they chose Century Gothic over <a href="http://www.ecofont.com/" title="ecofont.com" rel="nofollow">EcoFont</a> [ecofont.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is wrong with printing emails .
Sorry but the world is not full of freaky geeks like us .
While computers , email and the " Internet " is common place these days .
They are n't common everywhere , as you seem to think.A builder , although may use a computer for billing his/her customers and what not .
Probably does n't want to bring their desktop to the 'office ' to show his buds this sweet deal on a new tool chest he saw online.A school , government funded .
Probably does have a few computers , but one per teacher , one per student ?
Unlikely. Printing a time table out and putting it on a notice board somewhere is likely to be more effective.Your idea of this world being a paperless one is very naive.-------To be more on topic : I 'm more concerned that they chose Century Gothic over EcoFont [ ecofont.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is wrong with printing emails.
Sorry but the world is not full of freaky geeks like us.
While computers, email and the "Internet" is common place these days.
They aren't common everywhere, as you seem to think.A builder, although may use a computer for billing his/her customers and what not.
Probably doesn't want to bring their desktop to the 'office' to show his buds this sweet deal on a new tool chest he saw online.A school, government funded.
Probably does have a few computers, but one per teacher, one per student?
Unlikely. Printing a time table out and putting it on a notice board somewhere is likely to be more effective.Your idea of this world being a paperless one is very naive.-------To be more on topic:I'm more concerned that they chose Century Gothic over EcoFont [ecofont.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31634848</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>shiftless</author>
	<datestamp>1269611340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>YOU WIN TEH PR1ZE!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>YOU WIN TEH PR1ZE ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>YOU WIN TEH PR1ZE!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31636852</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269625260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Colonel Pointy Hair</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Colonel Pointy Hair</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Colonel Pointy Hair</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629156</id>
	<title>Re:Why not laser print?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269628440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bought my HP laserjet 1005 for $49  I have not replaced the toner once, they last forever, and are super cheap to refill</p><p>Maybe somebody should clue them in that Walgreens now refills cartridges for cheap... oh and also that Inkjet printers are a thing of the 90's now that color lasers are under 200 bucks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bought my HP laserjet 1005 for $ 49 I have not replaced the toner once , they last forever , and are super cheap to refillMaybe somebody should clue them in that Walgreens now refills cartridges for cheap... oh and also that Inkjet printers are a thing of the 90 's now that color lasers are under 200 bucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bought my HP laserjet 1005 for $49  I have not replaced the toner once, they last forever, and are super cheap to refillMaybe somebody should clue them in that Walgreens now refills cartridges for cheap... oh and also that Inkjet printers are a thing of the 90's now that color lasers are under 200 bucks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628594</id>
	<title>Re:Ah</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269626700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's much faster to add notes/ corrections on a paper than trying to open<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.doc,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.pdf,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.odt file formats and try to type in your own annotations. It's the same reason why Kindle is great for reading books, shitty to write notes on ( textbooks).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's much faster to add notes/ corrections on a paper than trying to open .doc , .pdf , .odt file formats and try to type in your own annotations .
It 's the same reason why Kindle is great for reading books , shitty to write notes on ( textbooks ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's much faster to add notes/ corrections on a paper than trying to open .doc, .pdf, .odt file formats and try to type in your own annotations.
It's the same reason why Kindle is great for reading books, shitty to write notes on ( textbooks).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628828</id>
	<title>Re:Why not use Ecofont?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269627480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is a good posting explaining why Ecofont doesn't offer any advantage over a light serif on <a href="http://www.fontblog.de.nyud.net/die-ecofont-schnapsidee-oder" title="nyud.net" rel="nofollow">Fontblog</a> [nyud.net] (only in German, here's an <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/01/31/cut-costs-by-saving-ink-with-ecofont/#comment-870994" title="sitepoint.com" rel="nofollow">English summary</a> [sitepoint.com]). Fontblog is written by typography professionaly and can be trusted on these things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a good posting explaining why Ecofont does n't offer any advantage over a light serif on Fontblog [ nyud.net ] ( only in German , here 's an English summary [ sitepoint.com ] ) .
Fontblog is written by typography professionaly and can be trusted on these things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a good posting explaining why Ecofont doesn't offer any advantage over a light serif on Fontblog [nyud.net] (only in German, here's an English summary [sitepoint.com]).
Fontblog is written by typography professionaly and can be trusted on these things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632702</id>
	<title>Re:.sig files...</title>
	<author>pdabbadabba</author>
	<datestamp>1269598860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Another approach would be to ban ridiculous gigantic<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.sig files, complete with...a giant block of text mandated by legal.</p></div><p>The problem with getting rid of things mandated by legal is that they're mandated. By legal.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Another approach would be to ban ridiculous gigantic .sig files , complete with...a giant block of text mandated by legal.The problem with getting rid of things mandated by legal is that they 're mandated .
By legal .
: (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another approach would be to ban ridiculous gigantic .sig files, complete with...a giant block of text mandated by legal.The problem with getting rid of things mandated by legal is that they're mandated.
By legal.
:(
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628180</id>
	<title>Even Simpler Solution...</title>
	<author>pandrijeczko</author>
	<datestamp>1269625320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...charge the students the same as it costs the college to print each page - then see how much they *DO* actually print.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...charge the students the same as it costs the college to print each page - then see how much they * DO * actually print .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...charge the students the same as it costs the college to print each page - then see how much they *DO* actually print.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627906</id>
	<title>Re:Ah</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269624600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ah the idiots of slashdot strike again!</p><p><b>Its</b> a university.. where you *TURN IN* papers.  Yes, you can email them, but professors think they are gods of <b>there</b> classrooms and can demand paper copies.</p></div><p>Speaking of idiots on Slashdot...</p><p>You were SO CLOSE to the hat trick - all you would have needed is either a loose/lose swap or a "here comes an s" apostrophe. Try harder next time!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah the idiots of slashdot strike again ! Its a university.. where you * TURN IN * papers .
Yes , you can email them , but professors think they are gods of there classrooms and can demand paper copies.Speaking of idiots on Slashdot...You were SO CLOSE to the hat trick - all you would have needed is either a loose/lose swap or a " here comes an s " apostrophe .
Try harder next time !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah the idiots of slashdot strike again!Its a university.. where you *TURN IN* papers.
Yes, you can email them, but professors think they are gods of there classrooms and can demand paper copies.Speaking of idiots on Slashdot...You were SO CLOSE to the hat trick - all you would have needed is either a loose/lose swap or a "here comes an s" apostrophe.
Try harder next time!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630782</id>
	<title>Re:.sig files...</title>
	<author>eulernet</author>
	<datestamp>1269634380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another huge saving can be done by simply keeping only the last reply.</p><p>I have mails where the whole discussion goes on and on, with nobody removing all the old comments.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another huge saving can be done by simply keeping only the last reply.I have mails where the whole discussion goes on and on , with nobody removing all the old comments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another huge saving can be done by simply keeping only the last reply.I have mails where the whole discussion goes on and on, with nobody removing all the old comments.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628296</id>
	<title>Well, idle is pants</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269625680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google for Arial and Century Gothic. The former is clearl ment for reading, the latter for presentation. Arial is easy to read because it has enough "squiggles" for the brain to distinguish letters at rapid pace. Century gothic looks very nice and I would recommend it any day for BIG Headlines Buy This Car Now - type things, never for something you are supposed to be actually reading for prolonged time.</p><p>Then again, who the hell send an email over 50 words these days? So, *shrug*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google for Arial and Century Gothic .
The former is clearl ment for reading , the latter for presentation .
Arial is easy to read because it has enough " squiggles " for the brain to distinguish letters at rapid pace .
Century gothic looks very nice and I would recommend it any day for BIG Headlines Buy This Car Now - type things , never for something you are supposed to be actually reading for prolonged time.Then again , who the hell send an email over 50 words these days ?
So , * shrug *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google for Arial and Century Gothic.
The former is clearl ment for reading, the latter for presentation.
Arial is easy to read because it has enough "squiggles" for the brain to distinguish letters at rapid pace.
Century gothic looks very nice and I would recommend it any day for BIG Headlines Buy This Car Now - type things, never for something you are supposed to be actually reading for prolonged time.Then again, who the hell send an email over 50 words these days?
So, *shrug*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628638</id>
	<title>Re:.sig files...</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1269626820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Another approach would be to ban<br>
&nbsp; ridiculous gigantic<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.sig files, complete with<br>
&nbsp; name, email address, snail-mail, address,<br>
&nbsp; three phone numbers, URL, twitter link,<br>
&nbsp; facebook link, linkedin link, blog link,<br>
&nbsp; some kind of logo and a giant block of text<br>
&nbsp; mandated by legal. Oh yeah, and coded in<br>
&nbsp; HTML so it matches corporate colours. Ugh.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Sometimes I get emails where the sig is longer than the body of the freakin' email.</p></div><p>Yes.<br>You're right.<br>It's also annoying when people quote without trimming.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><p>- c64\_love<br></p><p><tt>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Fred Haddad - via<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; FidoNet node 1:270/411<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; UUCP:<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...!eds1!devon<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; !rhutch!Fred.Haddad<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Fred.Haddad<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; @rhutch.FIDONET.ORG<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. .  \_\_<br>. .<nobr> <wbr></nobr>///   NOW PLAYING:<br>\_\_<nobr> <wbr></nobr>///   CD quality music<br>\\///    Over 1 million colors<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>.\X/  "Only Amiga makes it possible!"<br></tt></p><p>(Yes these are my actual sigs from the 1980s, when I was young and stupid and made them ridiculously long.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Another approach would be to ban   ridiculous gigantic .sig files , complete with   name , email address , snail-mail , address ,   three phone numbers , URL , twitter link ,   facebook link , linkedin link , blog link ,   some kind of logo and a giant block of text   mandated by legal .
Oh yeah , and coded in   HTML so it matches corporate colours .
Ugh .     Sometimes I get emails where the sig is longer than the body of the freakin ' email.Yes.You 're right.It 's also annoying when people quote without trimming .
; - ) - c64 \ _love     Fred Haddad - via     FidoNet node 1 : 270/411     UUCP : ... ! eds1 ! devon     ! rhutch ! Fred.Haddad     Fred.Haddad     @ rhutch.FIDONET.ORG .. . \ _ \ _ .
. /// NOW PLAYING : \ _ \ _ /// CD quality music \ \ /// Over 1 million colors . \ X/ " Only Amiga makes it possible !
" ( Yes these are my actual sigs from the 1980s , when I was young and stupid and made them ridiculously long .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another approach would be to ban
  ridiculous gigantic .sig files, complete with
  name, email address, snail-mail, address,
  three phone numbers, URL, twitter link,
  facebook link, linkedin link, blog link,
  some kind of logo and a giant block of text
  mandated by legal.
Oh yeah, and coded in
  HTML so it matches corporate colours.
Ugh.
    Sometimes I get emails where the sig is longer than the body of the freakin' email.Yes.You're right.It's also annoying when people quote without trimming.
;-)- c64\_love
    Fred Haddad - via
    FidoNet node 1:270/411
    UUCP: ...!eds1!devon
    !rhutch!Fred.Haddad
    Fred.Haddad
    @rhutch.FIDONET.ORG .. .  \_\_.
. ///   NOW PLAYING:\_\_ ///   CD quality music\\///    Over 1 million colors .\X/  "Only Amiga makes it possible!
"(Yes these are my actual sigs from the 1980s, when I was young and stupid and made them ridiculously long.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31638052</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>MacWiz</author>
	<datestamp>1269687840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Only if people are printing emails...</i></p><p>Wait a minute...</p><p>The people at the college are re-formatting their e-mail to save ink. Assuming this actually works well enough to make it worth the effort, I bet that's very helpful -- <i>for the people they send it to</i>. Someone is going to spend a lot of time reformatting the <i>incoming</i> e-mail. That labor will cost more than the potential savings in ink.</p><p>And ink doesn't cost anywhere near $1,000 a gallon if you buy it by the quart. Of course, those cartridges won't refill themselves, but you could do a dozen of them in 10 minutes.</p><p>I think the only real question is why they print so much damn e-mail in the first place. Seems primitive, especially for a college. And pointless. An entire room full of data can fit on an appropriately sized hard drive. And you know there's another room at the other end of this data retention process where somone is shredding the oldest stuff to make room for the new stuff. Or they pay someone to haul it away and destroy it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only if people are printing emails...Wait a minute...The people at the college are re-formatting their e-mail to save ink .
Assuming this actually works well enough to make it worth the effort , I bet that 's very helpful -- for the people they send it to .
Someone is going to spend a lot of time reformatting the incoming e-mail .
That labor will cost more than the potential savings in ink.And ink does n't cost anywhere near $ 1,000 a gallon if you buy it by the quart .
Of course , those cartridges wo n't refill themselves , but you could do a dozen of them in 10 minutes.I think the only real question is why they print so much damn e-mail in the first place .
Seems primitive , especially for a college .
And pointless .
An entire room full of data can fit on an appropriately sized hard drive .
And you know there 's another room at the other end of this data retention process where somone is shredding the oldest stuff to make room for the new stuff .
Or they pay someone to haul it away and destroy it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only if people are printing emails...Wait a minute...The people at the college are re-formatting their e-mail to save ink.
Assuming this actually works well enough to make it worth the effort, I bet that's very helpful -- for the people they send it to.
Someone is going to spend a lot of time reformatting the incoming e-mail.
That labor will cost more than the potential savings in ink.And ink doesn't cost anywhere near $1,000 a gallon if you buy it by the quart.
Of course, those cartridges won't refill themselves, but you could do a dozen of them in 10 minutes.I think the only real question is why they print so much damn e-mail in the first place.
Seems primitive, especially for a college.
And pointless.
An entire room full of data can fit on an appropriately sized hard drive.
And you know there's another room at the other end of this data retention process where somone is shredding the oldest stuff to make room for the new stuff.
Or they pay someone to haul it away and destroy it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628994</id>
	<title>Re:Why not use Ecofont?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269627900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to Ecofont's site their software causes their font to kick in only at the smaller point sizes (ie. 11pt and under)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to Ecofont 's site their software causes their font to kick in only at the smaller point sizes ( ie .
11pt and under )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to Ecofont's site their software causes their font to kick in only at the smaller point sizes (ie.
11pt and under)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628042</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269624960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>try working at a financial (or similar) institution where it is required by law to stay compliant for audits, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>try working at a financial ( or similar ) institution where it is required by law to stay compliant for audits , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>try working at a financial (or similar) institution where it is required by law to stay compliant for audits, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628690</id>
	<title>Re:Why not use Ecofont?</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1269627000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;&gt;Cause those holes are really distracting in the Wikipedia example</p><p>Only because they are on a screen.  When printed the Ecofont's holes disappear due to the way ink "flows" into the paper.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; &gt; Cause those holes are really distracting in the Wikipedia exampleOnly because they are on a screen .
When printed the Ecofont 's holes disappear due to the way ink " flows " into the paper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;&gt;Cause those holes are really distracting in the Wikipedia exampleOnly because they are on a screen.
When printed the Ecofont's holes disappear due to the way ink "flows" into the paper.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31633226</id>
	<title>e-mail:  you're doing it wrong</title>
	<author>sylvandb</author>
	<datestamp>1269601260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Q.E.D.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Q.E.D .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Q.E.D.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630934</id>
	<title>Re:Ah</title>
	<author>MistrBlank</author>
	<datestamp>1269635100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If he demanded pdf formats too, he could even read them on a kindle or ipad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If he demanded pdf formats too , he could even read them on a kindle or ipad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If he demanded pdf formats too, he could even read them on a kindle or ipad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629196</id>
	<title>Re:Not a bad idea...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269628560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It runs wider and is less legible. Have they included the increase in paper cost in their calculations?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It runs wider and is less legible .
Have they included the increase in paper cost in their calculations ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It runs wider and is less legible.
Have they included the increase in paper cost in their calculations?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630744</id>
	<title>They do print many of them</title>
	<author>bigsexyjoe</author>
	<datestamp>1269634200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sure only a small fraction of the emails get printed.  But a small fraction of all the emails at The University of Wisconsin-Green Bay is still A LOT of emails.  So it's a great idea.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure only a small fraction of the emails get printed .
But a small fraction of all the emails at The University of Wisconsin-Green Bay is still A LOT of emails .
So it 's a great idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure only a small fraction of the emails get printed.
But a small fraction of all the emails at The University of Wisconsin-Green Bay is still A LOT of emails.
So it's a great idea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628392</id>
	<title>Re:.sig files...</title>
	<author>Ksevio</author>
	<datestamp>1269625980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't forget the slew of meaningless titles for various committees or for students, clubs that many people feel it necessary to tell me for each email sent.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget the slew of meaningless titles for various committees or for students , clubs that many people feel it necessary to tell me for each email sent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget the slew of meaningless titles for various committees or for students, clubs that many people feel it necessary to tell me for each email sent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31631138</id>
	<title>Re:Printing email.</title>
	<author>Tekfactory</author>
	<datestamp>1269635820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had a Economics partner at a firm I used to temp for that was pretty computer savvy, he had weatherbug set to tell him what temperature it was at his beachhouse and how the wind was blowing and if it was good, he'd leave early and go sailing.</p><p>He had a laptop, he did presentations at various client sites, but he'd always print his slides to transparencies.</p><p>How did this effect me? after about 50 color transparencies, the printer would jam, when the transparencies would start melting in the fuser.</p><p>Why did he print transparencies when he had a laptop? because the laptop plus power supply weighed more than the transparencies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had a Economics partner at a firm I used to temp for that was pretty computer savvy , he had weatherbug set to tell him what temperature it was at his beachhouse and how the wind was blowing and if it was good , he 'd leave early and go sailing.He had a laptop , he did presentations at various client sites , but he 'd always print his slides to transparencies.How did this effect me ?
after about 50 color transparencies , the printer would jam , when the transparencies would start melting in the fuser.Why did he print transparencies when he had a laptop ?
because the laptop plus power supply weighed more than the transparencies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had a Economics partner at a firm I used to temp for that was pretty computer savvy, he had weatherbug set to tell him what temperature it was at his beachhouse and how the wind was blowing and if it was good, he'd leave early and go sailing.He had a laptop, he did presentations at various client sites, but he'd always print his slides to transparencies.How did this effect me?
after about 50 color transparencies, the printer would jam, when the transparencies would start melting in the fuser.Why did he print transparencies when he had a laptop?
because the laptop plus power supply weighed more than the transparencies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629216</id>
	<title>Re:Why not use Ecofont?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269628620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>or turn on the "draft" feature of your printer. It will look almost the same (grey instead of black text)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>or turn on the " draft " feature of your printer .
It will look almost the same ( grey instead of black text )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or turn on the "draft" feature of your printer.
It will look almost the same (grey instead of black text)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630092</id>
	<title>Re:Why not laser print?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269631680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because the initial capital cost of buying the printers sticks out like a sore thumb on their budgets whereas the cost of maintaining them and supplies is either spread out over time or isn't budgeted.</p><p>I used to work with a conversation group that wanted to build a fancy path and observation platform.  I refused to support it unless they found funds to cover maintaining them.  What is the point of the initial purchase if you are just going to let them rot and get vandalized?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because the initial capital cost of buying the printers sticks out like a sore thumb on their budgets whereas the cost of maintaining them and supplies is either spread out over time or is n't budgeted.I used to work with a conversation group that wanted to build a fancy path and observation platform .
I refused to support it unless they found funds to cover maintaining them .
What is the point of the initial purchase if you are just going to let them rot and get vandalized ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because the initial capital cost of buying the printers sticks out like a sore thumb on their budgets whereas the cost of maintaining them and supplies is either spread out over time or isn't budgeted.I used to work with a conversation group that wanted to build a fancy path and observation platform.
I refused to support it unless they found funds to cover maintaining them.
What is the point of the initial purchase if you are just going to let them rot and get vandalized?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628518</id>
	<title>Re:disclaimer: in the industry</title>
	<author>larkost</author>
	<datestamp>1269626340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Student printing largely pays for itself through the printing fees charged to the students. I am sure the UWGB is advocating to their students to make the font change, but that is largely a secondary issue. What they are probably talking about here is printing done by faculty and staff, where the local IT department picks up the cost of ink/toner.</p><p>And I think your measurement of the cost for lasers is a couple of orders of magnitude off. It is still much cheaper than ink-jet, but not that much cheaper.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Student printing largely pays for itself through the printing fees charged to the students .
I am sure the UWGB is advocating to their students to make the font change , but that is largely a secondary issue .
What they are probably talking about here is printing done by faculty and staff , where the local IT department picks up the cost of ink/toner.And I think your measurement of the cost for lasers is a couple of orders of magnitude off .
It is still much cheaper than ink-jet , but not that much cheaper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Student printing largely pays for itself through the printing fees charged to the students.
I am sure the UWGB is advocating to their students to make the font change, but that is largely a secondary issue.
What they are probably talking about here is printing done by faculty and staff, where the local IT department picks up the cost of ink/toner.And I think your measurement of the cost for lasers is a couple of orders of magnitude off.
It is still much cheaper than ink-jet, but not that much cheaper.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628162</id>
	<title>Re:Why not use Ecofont?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269625260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's hope they're using a really small font size. Cause those holes are really distracting in the Wikipedia example. The main advantage to reading from paper is faster reading speed (and arguably, less eyestrain), but if you're constantly distracted by the weird font, you'll lose that. Of course, using a small font size in the first place would save more ink (and more paper, due to more words per page) than a gimmicky font.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's hope they 're using a really small font size .
Cause those holes are really distracting in the Wikipedia example .
The main advantage to reading from paper is faster reading speed ( and arguably , less eyestrain ) , but if you 're constantly distracted by the weird font , you 'll lose that .
Of course , using a small font size in the first place would save more ink ( and more paper , due to more words per page ) than a gimmicky font .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's hope they're using a really small font size.
Cause those holes are really distracting in the Wikipedia example.
The main advantage to reading from paper is faster reading speed (and arguably, less eyestrain), but if you're constantly distracted by the weird font, you'll lose that.
Of course, using a small font size in the first place would save more ink (and more paper, due to more words per page) than a gimmicky font.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31633810</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269604740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is why you have backups.  It leaves a trail that some a-horn cannot remove so easily.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why you have backups .
It leaves a trail that some a-horn can not remove so easily .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why you have backups.
It leaves a trail that some a-horn cannot remove so easily.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630500</id>
	<title>Re:Why not use Ecofont?</title>
	<author>adisakp</author>
	<datestamp>1269633180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It has "holes" in the letters to save ink.  So instead of 30\% less ink usage this college would have about 45\% less ink usage.
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecofont" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecofont</a> [wikipedia.org] </p></div><p>Big problem though -- reading this font, the holes line up and cause banding which makes it look like the printer is running out of ink or that the printer is broken at a quick glance.  Also the banding causes eyestrain... even if they move the holes around randomly (which would be hard to do right), the font is not as easy to read as a filled in font.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It has " holes " in the letters to save ink .
So instead of 30 \ % less ink usage this college would have about 45 \ % less ink usage .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecofont [ wikipedia.org ] Big problem though -- reading this font , the holes line up and cause banding which makes it look like the printer is running out of ink or that the printer is broken at a quick glance .
Also the banding causes eyestrain... even if they move the holes around randomly ( which would be hard to do right ) , the font is not as easy to read as a filled in font .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has "holes" in the letters to save ink.
So instead of 30\% less ink usage this college would have about 45\% less ink usage.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecofont [wikipedia.org] Big problem though -- reading this font, the holes line up and cause banding which makes it look like the printer is running out of ink or that the printer is broken at a quick glance.
Also the banding causes eyestrain... even if they move the holes around randomly (which would be hard to do right), the font is not as easy to read as a filled in font.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632200</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>hazem</author>
	<datestamp>1269596820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I take it people at the school don't have to pay anything for those prints?  If there aren't any charges or quotas, they'll print tremendous amounts and often leave it in the printers.</p><p>In the school lab I worked at, we had a quota system where every student was allocated a "free" 500 pages every term.  Few used that much, but where a handful that given the chance would burn through cases of paper.</p><p>Another option is to bill per page, at least over a certain number of them.  Do it through the student accounts office and they have to pay before they can register for the next term.</p><p>It's like a mini tragedy of the commons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I take it people at the school do n't have to pay anything for those prints ?
If there are n't any charges or quotas , they 'll print tremendous amounts and often leave it in the printers.In the school lab I worked at , we had a quota system where every student was allocated a " free " 500 pages every term .
Few used that much , but where a handful that given the chance would burn through cases of paper.Another option is to bill per page , at least over a certain number of them .
Do it through the student accounts office and they have to pay before they can register for the next term.It 's like a mini tragedy of the commons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I take it people at the school don't have to pay anything for those prints?
If there aren't any charges or quotas, they'll print tremendous amounts and often leave it in the printers.In the school lab I worked at, we had a quota system where every student was allocated a "free" 500 pages every term.
Few used that much, but where a handful that given the chance would burn through cases of paper.Another option is to bill per page, at least over a certain number of them.
Do it through the student accounts office and they have to pay before they can register for the next term.It's like a mini tragedy of the commons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629312</id>
	<title>Re:.sig files...</title>
	<author>Just Some Guy</author>
	<datestamp>1269628980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Oh yeah, and coded in HTML so it matches corporate colours.</p></div><p>Does it take more ink to print text that's been formatted in HTML?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yeah , and coded in HTML so it matches corporate colours.Does it take more ink to print text that 's been formatted in HTML ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yeah, and coded in HTML so it matches corporate colours.Does it take more ink to print text that's been formatted in HTML?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31634472</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>jonadab</author>
	<datestamp>1269608820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; Only if people are printing emails...<br><br>When you get out of computer-geek circles and spend some time among ordinary garden-variety end users, you quickly find out that just about the only people who don't print email are the ones who don't *check* their email.  Sometimes they print it first, in order to keep it so they'll have it, and then they delete it from the computer so it won't take up space.<br><br>People also print web pages, a good deal more often than they print word processing documents.  Frequently they print web pages that they don't even want.  And they never EVER use print preview to decide which pages to print.  You can wheedle, cajole, beg, threaten, and charge them a quarter a page, but they still won't use print preview.  Even when they've been printing the same web page every day for years, and it *always* comes out three pages long, and pages 1 and 3 *always* consist of junk they don't want (headers, footers, ads,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...), they still won't print just page 2, no matter how many times you show them how.  (And yes, people really do print the same web page habitually.  Usually it's a web pages that sometimes gets changed or updated, but not always.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Only if people are printing emails...When you get out of computer-geek circles and spend some time among ordinary garden-variety end users , you quickly find out that just about the only people who do n't print email are the ones who do n't * check * their email .
Sometimes they print it first , in order to keep it so they 'll have it , and then they delete it from the computer so it wo n't take up space.People also print web pages , a good deal more often than they print word processing documents .
Frequently they print web pages that they do n't even want .
And they never EVER use print preview to decide which pages to print .
You can wheedle , cajole , beg , threaten , and charge them a quarter a page , but they still wo n't use print preview .
Even when they 've been printing the same web page every day for years , and it * always * comes out three pages long , and pages 1 and 3 * always * consist of junk they do n't want ( headers , footers , ads , ... ) , they still wo n't print just page 2 , no matter how many times you show them how .
( And yes , people really do print the same web page habitually .
Usually it 's a web pages that sometimes gets changed or updated , but not always .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Only if people are printing emails...When you get out of computer-geek circles and spend some time among ordinary garden-variety end users, you quickly find out that just about the only people who don't print email are the ones who don't *check* their email.
Sometimes they print it first, in order to keep it so they'll have it, and then they delete it from the computer so it won't take up space.People also print web pages, a good deal more often than they print word processing documents.
Frequently they print web pages that they don't even want.
And they never EVER use print preview to decide which pages to print.
You can wheedle, cajole, beg, threaten, and charge them a quarter a page, but they still won't use print preview.
Even when they've been printing the same web page every day for years, and it *always* comes out three pages long, and pages 1 and 3 *always* consist of junk they don't want (headers, footers, ads, ...), they still won't print just page 2, no matter how many times you show them how.
(And yes, people really do print the same web page habitually.
Usually it's a web pages that sometimes gets changed or updated, but not always.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627878</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269624540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Same question here: I don't get the correlation between <i>email font</i> and saving printing money.  I don't think I've ever printed my email as that kind of defeats the purpose.  If they print all of there emails, they should have stuck with snail mail.  Although I have printed sizeable manuals using the schools printers before, but again, the email font wouldn't have changed anything in my case.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Same question here : I do n't get the correlation between email font and saving printing money .
I do n't think I 've ever printed my email as that kind of defeats the purpose .
If they print all of there emails , they should have stuck with snail mail .
Although I have printed sizeable manuals using the schools printers before , but again , the email font would n't have changed anything in my case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same question here: I don't get the correlation between email font and saving printing money.
I don't think I've ever printed my email as that kind of defeats the purpose.
If they print all of there emails, they should have stuck with snail mail.
Although I have printed sizeable manuals using the schools printers before, but again, the email font wouldn't have changed anything in my case.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31635642</id>
	<title>Stop using Inkjets!</title>
	<author>Lime Green Bowler</author>
	<datestamp>1269615840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"...new font uses about 30 percent less ink than the previous one..."<br> <br>
Stop using inkjets for anything but printing photos! We get people at working printings stupid emails, documents with an itty bit of color, or change their default printer to the color printer for convenience. Grr! Even colored graphs and crap for meetings are a waste- after they're read once, they get pitched anyway. Everybody wants digital copies in Email so they can keep them handy, or for forwarding. Copies are a waste, but nobody will see the trees!<br> <br>
I bought a cheap-ass Brother laser for home for $100. I'm still on my first (starter) cartridge, while my housemate has filled his Kodak and HP printers multiple times- and still has to leech off my printer when his are OOC. Fsck inkjets!</htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...new font uses about 30 percent less ink than the previous one... " Stop using inkjets for anything but printing photos !
We get people at working printings stupid emails , documents with an itty bit of color , or change their default printer to the color printer for convenience .
Grr ! Even colored graphs and crap for meetings are a waste- after they 're read once , they get pitched anyway .
Everybody wants digital copies in Email so they can keep them handy , or for forwarding .
Copies are a waste , but nobody will see the trees !
I bought a cheap-ass Brother laser for home for $ 100 .
I 'm still on my first ( starter ) cartridge , while my housemate has filled his Kodak and HP printers multiple times- and still has to leech off my printer when his are OOC .
Fsck inkjets !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...new font uses about 30 percent less ink than the previous one..." 
Stop using inkjets for anything but printing photos!
We get people at working printings stupid emails, documents with an itty bit of color, or change their default printer to the color printer for convenience.
Grr! Even colored graphs and crap for meetings are a waste- after they're read once, they get pitched anyway.
Everybody wants digital copies in Email so they can keep them handy, or for forwarding.
Copies are a waste, but nobody will see the trees!
I bought a cheap-ass Brother laser for home for $100.
I'm still on my first (starter) cartridge, while my housemate has filled his Kodak and HP printers multiple times- and still has to leech off my printer when his are OOC.
Fsck inkjets!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632308</id>
	<title>Re:Wait...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269597300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, even plain text emails have fonts.  How else do you read text on a computer?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , even plain text emails have fonts .
How else do you read text on a computer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, even plain text emails have fonts.
How else do you read text on a computer?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628368</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628672</id>
	<title>It's the same genius...</title>
	<author>Lead Butthead</author>
	<datestamp>1269626940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Who was the genius there that had them using ink jet printers instead of laser? Probably the same genius that thinks this will save them money?</p></div></blockquote><p>It's the same genius that tells employees to save all their electronic documents using smaller fonts to save disk space...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who was the genius there that had them using ink jet printers instead of laser ?
Probably the same genius that thinks this will save them money ? It 's the same genius that tells employees to save all their electronic documents using smaller fonts to save disk space.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who was the genius there that had them using ink jet printers instead of laser?
Probably the same genius that thinks this will save them money?It's the same genius that tells employees to save all their electronic documents using smaller fonts to save disk space...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630316</id>
	<title>Problem Solved!</title>
	<author>CopaceticOpus</author>
	<datestamp>1269632460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a much more effective solution to save ink on printed emails. Just add the following code the webmail software:</p><blockquote><div><p> <tt>&lt;style type='text/css' media='print'&gt;<br>
&nbsp; body { background-image: url('http://goatse.ext/hello.jpg'); background-repeat: repeat; }<br>&lt;/style&gt;</tt></p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a much more effective solution to save ink on printed emails .
Just add the following code the webmail software :   body { background-image : url ( 'http : //goatse.ext/hello.jpg ' ) ; background-repeat : repeat ; }</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a much more effective solution to save ink on printed emails.
Just add the following code the webmail software: 
  body { background-image: url('http://goatse.ext/hello.jpg'); background-repeat: repeat; } 
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628080</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269625080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you really want to go green...</p><p>STOP PRINTING E-MAILS!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you really want to go green...STOP PRINTING E-MAILS ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you really want to go green...STOP PRINTING E-MAILS!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628616</id>
	<title>or use lasers and use toner refills</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269626760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...  my P1005 cost $39.  Cheaper than an inkjet and about 1/5 th the cost per page.</p><p>or...   use a kodak printer and cut your costs in half instead of 30\%.  Do both and pay about 1/3 the cost.</p><p>or...  don't print; make available on mobile platforms (BB, etc) and archive on disk.  Cheapest solution yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... my P1005 cost $ 39 .
Cheaper than an inkjet and about 1/5 th the cost per page.or... use a kodak printer and cut your costs in half instead of 30 \ % .
Do both and pay about 1/3 the cost.or... do n't print ; make available on mobile platforms ( BB , etc ) and archive on disk .
Cheapest solution yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...  my P1005 cost $39.
Cheaper than an inkjet and about 1/5 th the cost per page.or...   use a kodak printer and cut your costs in half instead of 30\%.
Do both and pay about 1/3 the cost.or...  don't print; make available on mobile platforms (BB, etc) and archive on disk.
Cheapest solution yet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800</id>
	<title>Ah</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269624300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ah the idiots of slashdot strike again!
<p>
Its a university.. where you *TURN IN* papers.  Yes, you can email them, but professors think they are gods of there classrooms and can demand paper copies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah the idiots of slashdot strike again !
Its a university.. where you * TURN IN * papers .
Yes , you can email them , but professors think they are gods of there classrooms and can demand paper copies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah the idiots of slashdot strike again!
Its a university.. where you *TURN IN* papers.
Yes, you can email them, but professors think they are gods of there classrooms and can demand paper copies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629446</id>
	<title>Re:Why not use Ecofont?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269629400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sound almost like the economode that my 10 year old $20 HP laserjet has.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sound almost like the economode that my 10 year old $ 20 HP laserjet has .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sound almost like the economode that my 10 year old $20 HP laserjet has.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628058</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269625020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I worked in a DoD office a few years ago that was run by a Colonel who had all of his emails printed out <i>in triplicate</i> (one for his office, one for home, and one to file) by his secretary.  He never read any of his email on his computer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I worked in a DoD office a few years ago that was run by a Colonel who had all of his emails printed out in triplicate ( one for his office , one for home , and one to file ) by his secretary .
He never read any of his email on his computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I worked in a DoD office a few years ago that was run by a Colonel who had all of his emails printed out in triplicate (one for his office, one for home, and one to file) by his secretary.
He never read any of his email on his computer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31634434</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>ffflala</author>
	<datestamp>1269608580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I understand the need to CYA, but was there a reason that you couldn't forward or BCC such emails to a personal account?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I understand the need to CYA , but was there a reason that you could n't forward or BCC such emails to a personal account ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I understand the need to CYA, but was there a reason that you couldn't forward or BCC such emails to a personal account?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31633374</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1269602160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and I trust he was the 'previous DA' because his officemates sent him up the river for corruption and abuse of the legal system?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and I trust he was the 'previous DA ' because his officemates sent him up the river for corruption and abuse of the legal system ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and I trust he was the 'previous DA' because his officemates sent him up the river for corruption and abuse of the legal system?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630166</id>
	<title>Re:Heres an idea...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269631920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its actually much worse than that. I worked for an email archiving company. If the organization is sued, and the opposing attorneys find out that people are printing emails, ALL printed emails have to be discovered and relevant ones made available. Do you have any idea how much it would cost to find and physically examine every email in a University? And if anyone takes emails home, then the discovery has to include the home files/pc of every user.</p><p>If you HAVE to print out an email, make sure it is shredded immediately. Paper archives are an enormous legal liability.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its actually much worse than that .
I worked for an email archiving company .
If the organization is sued , and the opposing attorneys find out that people are printing emails , ALL printed emails have to be discovered and relevant ones made available .
Do you have any idea how much it would cost to find and physically examine every email in a University ?
And if anyone takes emails home , then the discovery has to include the home files/pc of every user.If you HAVE to print out an email , make sure it is shredded immediately .
Paper archives are an enormous legal liability .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its actually much worse than that.
I worked for an email archiving company.
If the organization is sued, and the opposing attorneys find out that people are printing emails, ALL printed emails have to be discovered and relevant ones made available.
Do you have any idea how much it would cost to find and physically examine every email in a University?
And if anyone takes emails home, then the discovery has to include the home files/pc of every user.If you HAVE to print out an email, make sure it is shredded immediately.
Paper archives are an enormous legal liability.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31638144</id>
	<title>Re</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269689040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having worked in a lab in a University I can hope that this will save some ink and hopefully some paper. I've seen what some buggers do and it would annoy me no end. I've seen kids print a hundred pages and then realize they've fuckin printed the wrong pdf! The same kid then spoke in class about how china is responsible in a big way for all the global warming.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having worked in a lab in a University I can hope that this will save some ink and hopefully some paper .
I 've seen what some buggers do and it would annoy me no end .
I 've seen kids print a hundred pages and then realize they 've fuckin printed the wrong pdf !
The same kid then spoke in class about how china is responsible in a big way for all the global warming.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having worked in a lab in a University I can hope that this will save some ink and hopefully some paper.
I've seen what some buggers do and it would annoy me no end.
I've seen kids print a hundred pages and then realize they've fuckin printed the wrong pdf!
The same kid then spoke in class about how china is responsible in a big way for all the global warming.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628302</id>
	<title>If you want to save money on printing...</title>
	<author>Balial</author>
	<datestamp>1269625740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... just throw out some printers. You'll save electricity and paper bills, too. If your staff are printing that many pages, you've got something wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... just throw out some printers .
You 'll save electricity and paper bills , too .
If your staff are printing that many pages , you 've got something wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... just throw out some printers.
You'll save electricity and paper bills, too.
If your staff are printing that many pages, you've got something wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630640</id>
	<title>Re:Ah</title>
	<author>TRRosen</author>
	<datestamp>1269633780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The biggest reason, however, is that I don't want to have to sit in an office to read and grade dozens of papers. I want to be able to do it on a plane, a train, a bus, on the beach, etc.</p></div><p>They have these new devices called laptops. Check them out. There those funny looking things your students bring to class.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The biggest reason , however , is that I do n't want to have to sit in an office to read and grade dozens of papers .
I want to be able to do it on a plane , a train , a bus , on the beach , etc.They have these new devices called laptops .
Check them out .
There those funny looking things your students bring to class .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The biggest reason, however, is that I don't want to have to sit in an office to read and grade dozens of papers.
I want to be able to do it on a plane, a train, a bus, on the beach, etc.They have these new devices called laptops.
Check them out.
There those funny looking things your students bring to class.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31646848</id>
	<title>What about printers that use no ink? Seriously.</title>
	<author>mdfrq</author>
	<datestamp>1269787200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about printers that use no consumables (no ink)?</p><p>From Slashdot: [A] printer introduced by Japanese company Sanwa Newtec, called the PrePeat RP-3100 (a play on "repeat"). It prints on A4-sized sheets of PET plastic, and these sheets can be reused up to 1,000 times, the company says. The printer uses heat transfer technology rather than ink, and so has no consumables. There's a video of the printer in operation at the link. The PrePeat costs about $5,600 and a supply of 1,000 plastic sheets will set you back another $3,300. However, the company gives a use case in which a corporation saves $7,360 per year on consumables, as well as putting less CO2 into the atmosphere. So far the PrePeat is available only in Japan.</p><p><a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/10/02/13/161242/A-Printer-That-Uses-No-Consumables?art\_pos=1" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/10/02/13/161242/A-Printer-That-Uses-No-Consumables?art\_pos=1</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p>Would these types of printers be a possibility for universities and businesses when they are available here? Do they not provide a high enough return-on-investment? Are they difficult to make remarks and redactions on? Ideas?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about printers that use no consumables ( no ink ) ? From Slashdot : [ A ] printer introduced by Japanese company Sanwa Newtec , called the PrePeat RP-3100 ( a play on " repeat " ) .
It prints on A4-sized sheets of PET plastic , and these sheets can be reused up to 1,000 times , the company says .
The printer uses heat transfer technology rather than ink , and so has no consumables .
There 's a video of the printer in operation at the link .
The PrePeat costs about $ 5,600 and a supply of 1,000 plastic sheets will set you back another $ 3,300 .
However , the company gives a use case in which a corporation saves $ 7,360 per year on consumables , as well as putting less CO2 into the atmosphere .
So far the PrePeat is available only in Japan.http : //hardware.slashdot.org/story/10/02/13/161242/A-Printer-That-Uses-No-Consumables ? art \ _pos = 1 [ slashdot.org ] Would these types of printers be a possibility for universities and businesses when they are available here ?
Do they not provide a high enough return-on-investment ?
Are they difficult to make remarks and redactions on ?
Ideas ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about printers that use no consumables (no ink)?From Slashdot: [A] printer introduced by Japanese company Sanwa Newtec, called the PrePeat RP-3100 (a play on "repeat").
It prints on A4-sized sheets of PET plastic, and these sheets can be reused up to 1,000 times, the company says.
The printer uses heat transfer technology rather than ink, and so has no consumables.
There's a video of the printer in operation at the link.
The PrePeat costs about $5,600 and a supply of 1,000 plastic sheets will set you back another $3,300.
However, the company gives a use case in which a corporation saves $7,360 per year on consumables, as well as putting less CO2 into the atmosphere.
So far the PrePeat is available only in Japan.http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/10/02/13/161242/A-Printer-That-Uses-No-Consumables?art\_pos=1 [slashdot.org]Would these types of printers be a possibility for universities and businesses when they are available here?
Do they not provide a high enough return-on-investment?
Are they difficult to make remarks and redactions on?
Ideas?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632560</id>
	<title>Re:Why not laser print?</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1269598380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And laser printers could be given to them all and still save money.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And laser printers could be given to them all and still save money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And laser printers could be given to them all and still save money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628462</id>
	<title>Dumb &amp; Dumber in Wisconsin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269626220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where to start?</p><p>#1: The default font should be pushed into their printers, not email system, and printers protected against unauthorized configuration.  Unspecified font types would then save serious money.</p><p>#2: Arial is better for numerical formatting.  Who does accounting with Century Gothic?</p><p>#3: No HTML formatted emails should be allowed through their email filters - ever! This was not the point of the article, but worthy to repeat ad Infinitum.</p><p>#4: Others say use Laser, not Inkjet. True!  Real easy to justify pawning off most of those costly Color printers for monochromatic B&amp;W, and get cartridges with superior shelf life and faster print times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where to start ? # 1 : The default font should be pushed into their printers , not email system , and printers protected against unauthorized configuration .
Unspecified font types would then save serious money. # 2 : Arial is better for numerical formatting .
Who does accounting with Century Gothic ? # 3 : No HTML formatted emails should be allowed through their email filters - ever !
This was not the point of the article , but worthy to repeat ad Infinitum. # 4 : Others say use Laser , not Inkjet .
True ! Real easy to justify pawning off most of those costly Color printers for monochromatic B&amp;W , and get cartridges with superior shelf life and faster print times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where to start?#1: The default font should be pushed into their printers, not email system, and printers protected against unauthorized configuration.
Unspecified font types would then save serious money.#2: Arial is better for numerical formatting.
Who does accounting with Century Gothic?#3: No HTML formatted emails should be allowed through their email filters - ever!
This was not the point of the article, but worthy to repeat ad Infinitum.#4: Others say use Laser, not Inkjet.
True!  Real easy to justify pawning off most of those costly Color printers for monochromatic B&amp;W, and get cartridges with superior shelf life and faster print times.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629192</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269628560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clearly you do not work at a school!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly you do not work at a school !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly you do not work at a school!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628404</id>
	<title>We've seen this before</title>
	<author>Lord Byron II</author>
	<datestamp>1269625980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There was a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. a couple of years ago about a company that release "ink saving" fonts that had holes in them - micro-dots in the black area of each letter, designed to be invisible to the naked eye, yet indistinguishable from the regular fonts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There was a / .
a couple of years ago about a company that release " ink saving " fonts that had holes in them - micro-dots in the black area of each letter , designed to be invisible to the naked eye , yet indistinguishable from the regular fonts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was a /.
a couple of years ago about a company that release "ink saving" fonts that had holes in them - micro-dots in the black area of each letter, designed to be invisible to the naked eye, yet indistinguishable from the regular fonts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627920</id>
	<title>Re:Ah</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269624660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ah the idiots of slashdot strike again!</p><p>Its a university.. where you *TURN IN* papers.  Yes, you can email them, but professors think they are gods of there classrooms and can demand paper copies.</p></div><p>you turn in papers from a word processor, not plain text in email.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah the idiots of slashdot strike again ! Its a university.. where you * TURN IN * papers .
Yes , you can email them , but professors think they are gods of there classrooms and can demand paper copies.you turn in papers from a word processor , not plain text in email .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah the idiots of slashdot strike again!Its a university.. where you *TURN IN* papers.
Yes, you can email them, but professors think they are gods of there classrooms and can demand paper copies.you turn in papers from a word processor, not plain text in email.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627786</id>
	<title>Printing email.</title>
	<author>saintlupus</author>
	<datestamp>1269624240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or, you could stop printing out all of your emails.</p><p>Oh, who am I kidding. We've still got professors at my school lecturing with transparencies they produced on typewriters. It's going to be years before the entirety of the faculty is willing to handle paperless communication.</p><p>--saint</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , you could stop printing out all of your emails.Oh , who am I kidding .
We 've still got professors at my school lecturing with transparencies they produced on typewriters .
It 's going to be years before the entirety of the faculty is willing to handle paperless communication.--saint</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, you could stop printing out all of your emails.Oh, who am I kidding.
We've still got professors at my school lecturing with transparencies they produced on typewriters.
It's going to be years before the entirety of the faculty is willing to handle paperless communication.--saint</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627852</id>
	<title>disclaimer: in the industry</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269624480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Firstly, train your students that printing up emails is stupid.</p><p>Secondly of all, give the students access to community laser printers. We're talking about pennies per page versus small fractions of pennies per page to print (i.e. 10 cents versus 0.001 cents)</p><p>Thirdly, switch over to re manufactured inks and toners. If the students are aware that they can buy aftermarket inks and toners, there's another 50\% savings off the top (AND it's "green"). There are good companies and there are bad companies. Find someone local. Its supports the nearby economy. If you have problems, you don't have to ship something back to China.</p><p>[disclaimer: I work in the reman industry. I'm biased. Lasers tend to be more reliable than reman'd inks. With lasers, you can disassemble everything and replace the parts. With inkjets, it's more like an artform. If the electronics fail (which they often do), the cart is SOL]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Firstly , train your students that printing up emails is stupid.Secondly of all , give the students access to community laser printers .
We 're talking about pennies per page versus small fractions of pennies per page to print ( i.e .
10 cents versus 0.001 cents ) Thirdly , switch over to re manufactured inks and toners .
If the students are aware that they can buy aftermarket inks and toners , there 's another 50 \ % savings off the top ( AND it 's " green " ) .
There are good companies and there are bad companies .
Find someone local .
Its supports the nearby economy .
If you have problems , you do n't have to ship something back to China .
[ disclaimer : I work in the reman industry .
I 'm biased .
Lasers tend to be more reliable than reman 'd inks .
With lasers , you can disassemble everything and replace the parts .
With inkjets , it 's more like an artform .
If the electronics fail ( which they often do ) , the cart is SOL ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Firstly, train your students that printing up emails is stupid.Secondly of all, give the students access to community laser printers.
We're talking about pennies per page versus small fractions of pennies per page to print (i.e.
10 cents versus 0.001 cents)Thirdly, switch over to re manufactured inks and toners.
If the students are aware that they can buy aftermarket inks and toners, there's another 50\% savings off the top (AND it's "green").
There are good companies and there are bad companies.
Find someone local.
Its supports the nearby economy.
If you have problems, you don't have to ship something back to China.
[disclaimer: I work in the reman industry.
I'm biased.
Lasers tend to be more reliable than reman'd inks.
With lasers, you can disassemble everything and replace the parts.
With inkjets, it's more like an artform.
If the electronics fail (which they often do), the cart is SOL]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630032</id>
	<title>Re:Why not use Ecofont?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269631380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed.  They could pay for <a href="http://www.ecofont.com/en/products/green/printing/sustainable-printing-using-ecofont-software.html" title="ecofont.com" rel="nofollow">Ecofont Software</a> [ecofont.com] and use whatever fonts they want... or if they're content to just change their font they could opt for <a href="http://www.ecofont.com/en/products/green/font/download-the-ink-saving-font.html" title="ecofont.com" rel="nofollow">Ecofont Vera Sans</a> [ecofont.com], which is free.</p><p>I'm still thinking somebody should produce a free fixed-width font like this so that my comp sci profs who like to print students' code could save some ink.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
They could pay for Ecofont Software [ ecofont.com ] and use whatever fonts they want... or if they 're content to just change their font they could opt for Ecofont Vera Sans [ ecofont.com ] , which is free.I 'm still thinking somebody should produce a free fixed-width font like this so that my comp sci profs who like to print students ' code could save some ink .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
They could pay for Ecofont Software [ecofont.com] and use whatever fonts they want... or if they're content to just change their font they could opt for Ecofont Vera Sans [ecofont.com], which is free.I'm still thinking somebody should produce a free fixed-width font like this so that my comp sci profs who like to print students' code could save some ink.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944</id>
	<title>Why not use Ecofont?</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1269624720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It has "holes" in the letters to save ink.  So instead of 30\% less ink usage this college would have about 45\% less ink usage.<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecofont" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecofont</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It has " holes " in the letters to save ink .
So instead of 30 \ % less ink usage this college would have about 45 \ % less ink usage.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecofont [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has "holes" in the letters to save ink.
So instead of 30\% less ink usage this college would have about 45\% less ink usage.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecofont [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627806</id>
	<title>Save more by not printing emails</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269624360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would someone be using ink for email.  People still print emails?!?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would someone be using ink for email .
People still print emails ? ! ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would someone be using ink for email.
People still print emails?!?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630458</id>
	<title>Save even more ink: use a reference</title>
	<author>Sloppy</author>
	<datestamp>1269633060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just print the message-id, instead of making a copy of the whole message.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just print the message-id , instead of making a copy of the whole message .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just print the message-id, instead of making a copy of the whole message.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629826</id>
	<title>Why stop there?</title>
	<author>200\_success</author>
	<datestamp>1269630600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.ecofont.com/" title="ecofont.com">Ecofont</a> [ecofont.com]: the font with holes within the strokes to save ink/toner.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ecofont [ ecofont.com ] : the font with holes within the strokes to save ink/toner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ecofont [ecofont.com]: the font with holes within the strokes to save ink/toner.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632716</id>
	<title>Re:Ah</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1269598920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>A proper submission protol will show whether or not a file was recieved. File format is easy to fix; Require a certain file format, I fail to see a problem on the last one.<br> <br>
Also, all your points on hospitals are void. You give an opinion but studies show otherwise. <a href="http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/Press\_releases/2009/01\_26\_09.html" title="hopkinsmedicine.org">http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/Press\_releases/2009/01\_26\_09.html</a> [hopkinsmedicine.org] <br> <br>
Last one I agree with but I think you'd be greatly helped out by a good e-ink type tablet with stylus. The tech is there or getting there depending on how fussy you are.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A proper submission protol will show whether or not a file was recieved .
File format is easy to fix ; Require a certain file format , I fail to see a problem on the last one .
Also , all your points on hospitals are void .
You give an opinion but studies show otherwise .
http : //www.hopkinsmedicine.org/Press \ _releases/2009/01 \ _26 \ _09.html [ hopkinsmedicine.org ] Last one I agree with but I think you 'd be greatly helped out by a good e-ink type tablet with stylus .
The tech is there or getting there depending on how fussy you are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A proper submission protol will show whether or not a file was recieved.
File format is easy to fix; Require a certain file format, I fail to see a problem on the last one.
Also, all your points on hospitals are void.
You give an opinion but studies show otherwise.
http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/Press\_releases/2009/01\_26\_09.html [hopkinsmedicine.org]  
Last one I agree with but I think you'd be greatly helped out by a good e-ink type tablet with stylus.
The tech is there or getting there depending on how fussy you are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628886</id>
	<title>Paper usage</title>
	<author>SilentGhost</author>
	<datestamp>1269627540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How much more paper will get wasted because of this?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How much more paper will get wasted because of this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much more paper will get wasted because of this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628872</id>
	<title>Re:Why not laser print?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269627540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At my company, it basically became "Tough, too bad.  We're not paying for inkjet ink any more without executive approval."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At my company , it basically became " Tough , too bad .
We 're not paying for inkjet ink any more without executive approval .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At my company, it basically became "Tough, too bad.
We're not paying for inkjet ink any more without executive approval.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628308</id>
	<title>Re:Ah</title>
	<author>Ksevio</author>
	<datestamp>1269625740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But they didn't mandate that all papers must use the new font, just the font in emails.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But they did n't mandate that all papers must use the new font , just the font in emails .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But they didn't mandate that all papers must use the new font, just the font in emails.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629436</id>
	<title>Re:.sig files...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269629400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sometimes I get emails where the sig is longer than the body of the freakin' email.</p></div><p>Only sometimes?  Can I have your job?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sometimes I get emails where the sig is longer than the body of the freakin ' email.Only sometimes ?
Can I have your job ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sometimes I get emails where the sig is longer than the body of the freakin' email.Only sometimes?
Can I have your job?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31631278</id>
	<title>Re:Why not laser print?</title>
	<author>trentblase</author>
	<datestamp>1269636300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What you should have done was give everyone their own free printer, but make them supply the ink themselves (giving them the alternative option of printing to the workgroup laser).  This scheme would probably pay for itself very quickly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What you should have done was give everyone their own free printer , but make them supply the ink themselves ( giving them the alternative option of printing to the workgroup laser ) .
This scheme would probably pay for itself very quickly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What you should have done was give everyone their own free printer, but make them supply the ink themselves (giving them the alternative option of printing to the workgroup laser).
This scheme would probably pay for itself very quickly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744</id>
	<title>email?</title>
	<author>rwven</author>
	<datestamp>1269624120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only if people are printing emails...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only if people are printing emails.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only if people are printing emails...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628982</id>
	<title>Who knew?</title>
	<author>SwedishChef</author>
	<datestamp>1269627840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People actually print out their emails?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People actually print out their emails ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People actually print out their emails?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627768</id>
	<title>Ikea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269624240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like something Ikea might try</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like something Ikea might try</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like something Ikea might try</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632060</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>ViralInfection</author>
	<datestamp>1269596280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>dont print, get an ipad</htmltext>
<tokenext>dont print , get an ipad</tokentext>
<sentencetext>dont print, get an ipad</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630390</id>
	<title>Re:Wait...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269632760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><em>Printers</em> have fonts.  Once you go down the stupid road and decide to print email, you're going to use <em>some</em> font. The part that doesn't make sense if that the TFA says they changed the default font in their "email system" rather than the default font in their printer or printing app.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Printers have fonts .
Once you go down the stupid road and decide to print email , you 're going to use some font .
The part that does n't make sense if that the TFA says they changed the default font in their " email system " rather than the default font in their printer or printing app .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Printers have fonts.
Once you go down the stupid road and decide to print email, you're going to use some font.
The part that doesn't make sense if that the TFA says they changed the default font in their "email system" rather than the default font in their printer or printing app.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628368</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629442</id>
	<title>Re:Printing email.</title>
	<author>IICV</author>
	<datestamp>1269629400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My wife worked in the lab of an eminent scientist in college. When he was away at conferences, one of her jobs was to print out all of his e-mails (including personal ones), put them in a Fedex box, and ship them to him.</p><p>She wasn't the only lab assistant who had to do that, either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My wife worked in the lab of an eminent scientist in college .
When he was away at conferences , one of her jobs was to print out all of his e-mails ( including personal ones ) , put them in a Fedex box , and ship them to him.She was n't the only lab assistant who had to do that , either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My wife worked in the lab of an eminent scientist in college.
When he was away at conferences, one of her jobs was to print out all of his e-mails (including personal ones), put them in a Fedex box, and ship them to him.She wasn't the only lab assistant who had to do that, either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632392</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>kgo</author>
	<datestamp>1269597720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where I used to work, some people printed out all their emails.  They'd print IN COLOR if there were any http addresses in the article, because of course http addresses are blue...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where I used to work , some people printed out all their emails .
They 'd print IN COLOR if there were any http addresses in the article , because of course http addresses are blue.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where I used to work, some people printed out all their emails.
They'd print IN COLOR if there were any http addresses in the article, because of course http addresses are blue...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627982</id>
	<title>Similar ideas</title>
	<author>crow</author>
	<datestamp>1269624780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While I agree that printing emails is stupid, the idea of changing defaults to reduce ink and toner usage is rather smart.  At my company, they changed the default Powerpoint template to one that would save on printing costs.  Again, people shouldn't be printing them out in the first place, but the fact is that they do, and this will save money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While I agree that printing emails is stupid , the idea of changing defaults to reduce ink and toner usage is rather smart .
At my company , they changed the default Powerpoint template to one that would save on printing costs .
Again , people should n't be printing them out in the first place , but the fact is that they do , and this will save money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I agree that printing emails is stupid, the idea of changing defaults to reduce ink and toner usage is rather smart.
At my company, they changed the default Powerpoint template to one that would save on printing costs.
Again, people shouldn't be printing them out in the first place, but the fact is that they do, and this will save money.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630504</id>
	<title>Stop using HTML in email</title>
	<author>origin29</author>
	<datestamp>1269633180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Turn off HTML and save bandwidth as well..</htmltext>
<tokenext>Turn off HTML and save bandwidth as well. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Turn off HTML and save bandwidth as well..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629092</id>
	<title>What the hell is an email font?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269628200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>/reads and writes email in plain text, goddamn it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>/reads and writes email in plain text , goddamn it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>/reads and writes email in plain text, goddamn it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627936</id>
	<title>.sig files...</title>
	<author>CohibaVancouver</author>
	<datestamp>1269624720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Another approach would be to ban ridiculous gigantic<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.sig files, complete with name, email address, snail-mail, address, three phone numbers, URL, twitter link, facebook link, linkedin link, blog link, some kind of logo and a giant block of text mandated by legal.  Oh yeah, and coded in HTML so it matches corporate colours.  Ugh.<br> <br>Sometimes I get emails where the sig is longer than the body of the freakin' email.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Another approach would be to ban ridiculous gigantic .sig files , complete with name , email address , snail-mail , address , three phone numbers , URL , twitter link , facebook link , linkedin link , blog link , some kind of logo and a giant block of text mandated by legal .
Oh yeah , and coded in HTML so it matches corporate colours .
Ugh. Sometimes I get emails where the sig is longer than the body of the freakin ' email .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another approach would be to ban ridiculous gigantic .sig files, complete with name, email address, snail-mail, address, three phone numbers, URL, twitter link, facebook link, linkedin link, blog link, some kind of logo and a giant block of text mandated by legal.
Oh yeah, and coded in HTML so it matches corporate colours.
Ugh. Sometimes I get emails where the sig is longer than the body of the freakin' email.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630650</id>
	<title>Re:Why not laser print?</title>
	<author>blair1q</author>
	<datestamp>1269633840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When you "strongly discourage" them, do you show them the total cost-to-own of their impending choice vs. the better one? Or do you just wave your hands?</p><p>Because they can't put hand-waving in the price box on a P.O.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When you " strongly discourage " them , do you show them the total cost-to-own of their impending choice vs. the better one ?
Or do you just wave your hands ? Because they ca n't put hand-waving in the price box on a P.O .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you "strongly discourage" them, do you show them the total cost-to-own of their impending choice vs. the better one?
Or do you just wave your hands?Because they can't put hand-waving in the price box on a P.O.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628178</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1269625320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since it is a smaller, lighter font, you can save a lot of money by not needing such large hard disks to store them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since it is a smaller , lighter font , you can save a lot of money by not needing such large hard disks to store them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since it is a smaller, lighter font, you can save a lot of money by not needing such large hard disks to store them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628746</id>
	<title>Re:Why not use Ecofont?</title>
	<author>thenonoman</author>
	<datestamp>1269627240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was going to suggest this.  The example in wikipedia may be distracting, but then if you are printing your email in a 72pt font, you have issues anyways.  I have used ecofont, and at the 12pt, you can not see the holes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was going to suggest this .
The example in wikipedia may be distracting , but then if you are printing your email in a 72pt font , you have issues anyways .
I have used ecofont , and at the 12pt , you can not see the holes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was going to suggest this.
The example in wikipedia may be distracting, but then if you are printing your email in a 72pt font, you have issues anyways.
I have used ecofont, and at the 12pt, you can not see the holes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628854</id>
	<title>Re:Why not use Ecofont?</title>
	<author>dniesen</author>
	<datestamp>1269627480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because they would actually need to install this font/software.  They can easily switch fonts and assume that everybody has Century Gothic as it's already widely installed.  The additional IT overhead probably don't justify the impact on savings.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because they would actually need to install this font/software .
They can easily switch fonts and assume that everybody has Century Gothic as it 's already widely installed .
The additional IT overhead probably do n't justify the impact on savings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because they would actually need to install this font/software.
They can easily switch fonts and assume that everybody has Century Gothic as it's already widely installed.
The additional IT overhead probably don't justify the impact on savings.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632262</id>
	<title>What the HELL</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1269597120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Save money on ink by switching email font..."</p><p>That's like ordering diet coke with your super-sized fast food menu.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p><p>Makes you weep...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Save money on ink by switching email font... " That 's like ordering diet coke with your super-sized fast food menu .
: ( Makes you weep.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Save money on ink by switching email font..."That's like ordering diet coke with your super-sized fast food menu.
:(Makes you weep...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31644664</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>rwven</author>
	<datestamp>1269706080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm lucky enough to work in an environment where I never have to print anything... I think in the past year I might have printed 2-3 things....if that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm lucky enough to work in an environment where I never have to print anything... I think in the past year I might have printed 2-3 things....if that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm lucky enough to work in an environment where I never have to print anything... I think in the past year I might have printed 2-3 things....if that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629020</id>
	<title>Re:Ah</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269628020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Ah the idiots of slashdot strike again!<br>
Its a university.. where you *TURN IN* papers.</p></div></blockquote><p>Yes, so what?<br> <br>How does changing the <i>email font</i> have any effect on the amount of ink (or the font) used for creating papers?<br> <br>In summary, I agree with your first point, which is proven by your second.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah the idiots of slashdot strike again !
Its a university.. where you * TURN IN * papers.Yes , so what ?
How does changing the email font have any effect on the amount of ink ( or the font ) used for creating papers ?
In summary , I agree with your first point , which is proven by your second .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah the idiots of slashdot strike again!
Its a university.. where you *TURN IN* papers.Yes, so what?
How does changing the email font have any effect on the amount of ink (or the font) used for creating papers?
In summary, I agree with your first point, which is proven by your second.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632606</id>
	<title>Re:Why not laser print?</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1269598500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because apple products are cost effective office tools..........</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because apple products are cost effective office tools......... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because apple products are cost effective office tools..........</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630196</id>
	<title>People never change</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269632040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>old men die.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>old men die .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>old men die.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628654</id>
	<title>$10,000.00 A GALLON?</title>
	<author>Higaran</author>
	<datestamp>1269626940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously, WTF? I knew printer ink was a rip off but I didn't think it was that bad, almost make me not so pissed off that that gas was only $3.19 a gallon by my house today.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , WTF ?
I knew printer ink was a rip off but I did n't think it was that bad , almost make me not so pissed off that that gas was only $ 3.19 a gallon by my house today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, WTF?
I knew printer ink was a rip off but I didn't think it was that bad, almost make me not so pissed off that that gas was only $3.19 a gallon by my house today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628482</id>
	<title>Re:Why not laser print?</title>
	<author>nmb3000</author>
	<datestamp>1269626280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>This is perhaps where something like an iPad could help go towards paperless.</i></p><p>When you consider the <b>reasons</b> people print their email, a trinket like the iPad is going completely the wrong direction. The people I've known that print their email usually do so for a few reasons:</p><p>- Easier for them to read on paper than a monitor<br>- They can easily annotate with corrective marks, shapes, arrows, comments<br>- Collate and file the message away with other paperwork<br>- Just don't like using computers for whatever reason and prefer a hard copy</p><p>Some of these are doable on a computer, but none are as <i>easy</i> on a computer.  It's fairly short-sighted and selfish do immediately disregard everyone that prints email as "stupid" or "just stubborn" (as commenters have done in other threads).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is perhaps where something like an iPad could help go towards paperless.When you consider the reasons people print their email , a trinket like the iPad is going completely the wrong direction .
The people I 've known that print their email usually do so for a few reasons : - Easier for them to read on paper than a monitor- They can easily annotate with corrective marks , shapes , arrows , comments- Collate and file the message away with other paperwork- Just do n't like using computers for whatever reason and prefer a hard copySome of these are doable on a computer , but none are as easy on a computer .
It 's fairly short-sighted and selfish do immediately disregard everyone that prints email as " stupid " or " just stubborn " ( as commenters have done in other threads ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is perhaps where something like an iPad could help go towards paperless.When you consider the reasons people print their email, a trinket like the iPad is going completely the wrong direction.
The people I've known that print their email usually do so for a few reasons:- Easier for them to read on paper than a monitor- They can easily annotate with corrective marks, shapes, arrows, comments- Collate and file the message away with other paperwork- Just don't like using computers for whatever reason and prefer a hard copySome of these are doable on a computer, but none are as easy on a computer.
It's fairly short-sighted and selfish do immediately disregard everyone that prints email as "stupid" or "just stubborn" (as commenters have done in other threads).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629236</id>
	<title>printer ink?</title>
	<author>Khashishi</author>
	<datestamp>1269628680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What school office uses printer ink? It's all laser pretty much everywhere. Laser toner is still pretty expensive, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What school office uses printer ink ?
It 's all laser pretty much everywhere .
Laser toner is still pretty expensive , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What school office uses printer ink?
It's all laser pretty much everywhere.
Laser toner is still pretty expensive, though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629292</id>
	<title>Re:Printing email.</title>
	<author>rootpoint</author>
	<datestamp>1269628920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whenever my manager has a question about an e-mail I sent, she prints it out and brings it into my office.  And whenever she wants a change made on the website, she prints out the admin page, writes in the new values, and gives it to me.

What she should really do is put the printed copy on a wooden table, take a picture, then e-mail that picture to me!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whenever my manager has a question about an e-mail I sent , she prints it out and brings it into my office .
And whenever she wants a change made on the website , she prints out the admin page , writes in the new values , and gives it to me .
What she should really do is put the printed copy on a wooden table , take a picture , then e-mail that picture to me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whenever my manager has a question about an e-mail I sent, she prints it out and brings it into my office.
And whenever she wants a change made on the website, she prints out the admin page, writes in the new values, and gives it to me.
What she should really do is put the printed copy on a wooden table, take a picture, then e-mail that picture to me!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628352</id>
	<title>Re:Why not laser print?</title>
	<author>michrech</author>
	<datestamp>1269625860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not as simple as you'd think (though there is no good reason it shouldn't be simple!).</p><p>See -- I work in the ITS department in a college.  We strongly discourage the individual departments from purchasing inkjet printers, however, because they're "cheap", and since we're facing huge budget reductions, the departments purchase them anyway.  They're then upset at the ink costs, which we warned them about.  They're even more pissed when they find out we can't obtain parts to fix their cheap pieces of garbage (let alone that, even if parts were available, our time spent fixing such a POS would make it too expensive).  It all boils down to short-term thinking.  They *never* take into account how long they'd like the printer to work, and it's total cost of operation.  They only see the initial bottom-line.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not as simple as you 'd think ( though there is no good reason it should n't be simple !
) .See -- I work in the ITS department in a college .
We strongly discourage the individual departments from purchasing inkjet printers , however , because they 're " cheap " , and since we 're facing huge budget reductions , the departments purchase them anyway .
They 're then upset at the ink costs , which we warned them about .
They 're even more pissed when they find out we ca n't obtain parts to fix their cheap pieces of garbage ( let alone that , even if parts were available , our time spent fixing such a POS would make it too expensive ) .
It all boils down to short-term thinking .
They * never * take into account how long they 'd like the printer to work , and it 's total cost of operation .
They only see the initial bottom-line .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not as simple as you'd think (though there is no good reason it shouldn't be simple!
).See -- I work in the ITS department in a college.
We strongly discourage the individual departments from purchasing inkjet printers, however, because they're "cheap", and since we're facing huge budget reductions, the departments purchase them anyway.
They're then upset at the ink costs, which we warned them about.
They're even more pissed when they find out we can't obtain parts to fix their cheap pieces of garbage (let alone that, even if parts were available, our time spent fixing such a POS would make it too expensive).
It all boils down to short-term thinking.
They *never* take into account how long they'd like the printer to work, and it's total cost of operation.
They only see the initial bottom-line.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629812</id>
	<title>Re:Not a bad idea...</title>
	<author>frank\_adrian314159</author>
	<datestamp>1269630540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Not that that's saying much - almost anything (sans Comic Sans) looks better than Arial.</i></p><p><i>And that being said, I would probably have started by looking at a serif'ed font.  Serif'ed fonts are much more legible, especially in large blocks, than sans serif fonts.  Having a lighter-faced font would also make legibility a bit more difficult (in the case of the chosen font, this is ameliorated by widening the characters).  I would have gone with a light, condensed font like ITC Cheltenham Condensed Light, or ITC Legacy Serif Light Condensed.  Or, if I wanted a really retro look with lots of ink savings, something like ITC American Typewriter Light Condensed.  Any of the serif'ed fonts are much more legible and, frankly, look classier than any of the "Helvetica redux" sans serif fonts, popular with the computer set these days.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not that that 's saying much - almost anything ( sans Comic Sans ) looks better than Arial.And that being said , I would probably have started by looking at a serif'ed font .
Serif'ed fonts are much more legible , especially in large blocks , than sans serif fonts .
Having a lighter-faced font would also make legibility a bit more difficult ( in the case of the chosen font , this is ameliorated by widening the characters ) .
I would have gone with a light , condensed font like ITC Cheltenham Condensed Light , or ITC Legacy Serif Light Condensed .
Or , if I wanted a really retro look with lots of ink savings , something like ITC American Typewriter Light Condensed .
Any of the serif'ed fonts are much more legible and , frankly , look classier than any of the " Helvetica redux " sans serif fonts , popular with the computer set these days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not that that's saying much - almost anything (sans Comic Sans) looks better than Arial.And that being said, I would probably have started by looking at a serif'ed font.
Serif'ed fonts are much more legible, especially in large blocks, than sans serif fonts.
Having a lighter-faced font would also make legibility a bit more difficult (in the case of the chosen font, this is ameliorated by widening the characters).
I would have gone with a light, condensed font like ITC Cheltenham Condensed Light, or ITC Legacy Serif Light Condensed.
Or, if I wanted a really retro look with lots of ink savings, something like ITC American Typewriter Light Condensed.
Any of the serif'ed fonts are much more legible and, frankly, look classier than any of the "Helvetica redux" sans serif fonts, popular with the computer set these days.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31631704</id>
	<title>Re:Ah</title>
	<author>Lemmy Caution</author>
	<datestamp>1269594900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The beach has this thing called the sun. It's in this big room called the "outside world." The sun is a big fire disk that makes it hard to see laptop screens, but is otherwise nice to sit under. You should check it out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The beach has this thing called the sun .
It 's in this big room called the " outside world .
" The sun is a big fire disk that makes it hard to see laptop screens , but is otherwise nice to sit under .
You should check it out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The beach has this thing called the sun.
It's in this big room called the "outside world.
" The sun is a big fire disk that makes it hard to see laptop screens, but is otherwise nice to sit under.
You should check it out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630558</id>
	<title>Re:Why not use Ecofont?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269633420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They'll spend more on glasses</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll spend more on glasses</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll spend more on glasses</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31636966</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>404 Clue Not Found</author>
	<datestamp>1269626160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How would you prove the boss-man wrote that and you didn't just type up a fake email yourself?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How would you prove the boss-man wrote that and you did n't just type up a fake email yourself ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How would you prove the boss-man wrote that and you didn't just type up a fake email yourself?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629580</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>Skuld-Chan</author>
	<datestamp>1269629880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you worked at a school? I do, and I run all the labs at a community college. These people are the villains of the forest. I'm not sure how much we spent per year on paper, but the local school district here (have a good friend who is a sys admin there) says they spend over 80k on paper every year - that's like 2 employees at the wages they pay people.</p><p>I do know they bring paper here on huge pallets in massive semi trucks driven here by Georgia Pacific - that's usually a sigh that you have a problem.</p><p>Needless to say - they print everything! Powerpoint slides, emails, webpages - you name it. I have a lab printer with 1262724 pages on its clock (I copied and pasted that from its status page). I have an open lab that goes through over 100 reams of paper per term (thats 50,000 sheets of paper) and over 15-20 toner cartridges per term, and a term is only 10 weeks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you worked at a school ?
I do , and I run all the labs at a community college .
These people are the villains of the forest .
I 'm not sure how much we spent per year on paper , but the local school district here ( have a good friend who is a sys admin there ) says they spend over 80k on paper every year - that 's like 2 employees at the wages they pay people.I do know they bring paper here on huge pallets in massive semi trucks driven here by Georgia Pacific - that 's usually a sigh that you have a problem.Needless to say - they print everything !
Powerpoint slides , emails , webpages - you name it .
I have a lab printer with 1262724 pages on its clock ( I copied and pasted that from its status page ) .
I have an open lab that goes through over 100 reams of paper per term ( thats 50,000 sheets of paper ) and over 15-20 toner cartridges per term , and a term is only 10 weeks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you worked at a school?
I do, and I run all the labs at a community college.
These people are the villains of the forest.
I'm not sure how much we spent per year on paper, but the local school district here (have a good friend who is a sys admin there) says they spend over 80k on paper every year - that's like 2 employees at the wages they pay people.I do know they bring paper here on huge pallets in massive semi trucks driven here by Georgia Pacific - that's usually a sigh that you have a problem.Needless to say - they print everything!
Powerpoint slides, emails, webpages - you name it.
I have a lab printer with 1262724 pages on its clock (I copied and pasted that from its status page).
I have an open lab that goes through over 100 reams of paper per term (thats 50,000 sheets of paper) and over 15-20 toner cartridges per term, and a term is only 10 weeks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630076</id>
	<title>April Fools</title>
	<author>rider\_prider</author>
	<datestamp>1269631620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>April Fools - less ink? and 30\% at that,...  really? c'mon,...</htmltext>
<tokenext>April Fools - less ink ?
and 30 \ % at that,... really ? c'mon,.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>April Fools - less ink?
and 30\% at that,...  really? c'mon,...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628808</id>
	<title>or they could</title>
	<author>jim\_v2000</author>
	<datestamp>1269627420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>STOP PRINTING EVERY FUCKING THING THAT POPS UP ON THEIR SCREEN.  Dear God, I hate this at school where every term each student gets a printed syllabus from every professor, and then also has to print every assignment before turning it it.  Why can't that all be done electronically?  And at work, we have a MS SQL Reporting Server where you can look at all the reports you want via a web browser and/or export to Excel.  BUT NO!  Everyone has to print everything to look at it, and then they throw it in the trash a few minutes later.  Once I got an email from a user who had PRINTED an error message they were getting, scanned it back into their computer, and then emailed me the scanned image.  WTH?
<br> <br>
If I had it my way, there would be one printer/copier and you'd have to have a damned good reason to use it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>STOP PRINTING EVERY FUCKING THING THAT POPS UP ON THEIR SCREEN .
Dear God , I hate this at school where every term each student gets a printed syllabus from every professor , and then also has to print every assignment before turning it it .
Why ca n't that all be done electronically ?
And at work , we have a MS SQL Reporting Server where you can look at all the reports you want via a web browser and/or export to Excel .
BUT NO !
Everyone has to print everything to look at it , and then they throw it in the trash a few minutes later .
Once I got an email from a user who had PRINTED an error message they were getting , scanned it back into their computer , and then emailed me the scanned image .
WTH ? If I had it my way , there would be one printer/copier and you 'd have to have a damned good reason to use it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>STOP PRINTING EVERY FUCKING THING THAT POPS UP ON THEIR SCREEN.
Dear God, I hate this at school where every term each student gets a printed syllabus from every professor, and then also has to print every assignment before turning it it.
Why can't that all be done electronically?
And at work, we have a MS SQL Reporting Server where you can look at all the reports you want via a web browser and/or export to Excel.
BUT NO!
Everyone has to print everything to look at it, and then they throw it in the trash a few minutes later.
Once I got an email from a user who had PRINTED an error message they were getting, scanned it back into their computer, and then emailed me the scanned image.
WTH?
 
If I had it my way, there would be one printer/copier and you'd have to have a damned good reason to use it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629772</id>
	<title>Re:Why not laser print?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269630480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It's fairly short-sighted and selfish do immediately disregard everyone that prints email as "stupid" or "just stubborn"</p></div></blockquote><p>

Not really:</p><blockquote><div><p>- Easier for them to read on paper than a monitor</p></div></blockquote><p>
e-ink display if eye strain is the issue, learn to use zoom if size is the issue.</p><blockquote><div><p>- They can easily annotate with corrective marks, shapes, arrows, comments</p></div></blockquote><p>
Tablet computer.  They can also forward their notes to everyone else without creating more paper.</p><blockquote><div><p>- Collate and file the message away with other paperwork</p></div></blockquote><p>
In a file folder that you have to thumb though while saying "I'm sure I have that email in here somewhere", rather than a folder system in your email that is accessible anywhere in the world that has a Internet connection?</p><blockquote><div><p>- Just don't like using computers for whatever reason and prefer a hard copy</p></div></blockquote><p>
Ok, explain how that isn't "stupid" or "just stubborn" considering how much cost is associated with printing, how much harder it is to work with (try doing legal discovery with mounds of paper), how much harder it is to share information, and how much it hurts the environment.  I'm not targeting my anger at you per se, I've just had to deal with too many people that want everyone else to spend more time and money working around their antique way of doing business.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's fairly short-sighted and selfish do immediately disregard everyone that prints email as " stupid " or " just stubborn " Not really : - Easier for them to read on paper than a monitor e-ink display if eye strain is the issue , learn to use zoom if size is the issue.- They can easily annotate with corrective marks , shapes , arrows , comments Tablet computer .
They can also forward their notes to everyone else without creating more paper.- Collate and file the message away with other paperwork In a file folder that you have to thumb though while saying " I 'm sure I have that email in here somewhere " , rather than a folder system in your email that is accessible anywhere in the world that has a Internet connection ? - Just do n't like using computers for whatever reason and prefer a hard copy Ok , explain how that is n't " stupid " or " just stubborn " considering how much cost is associated with printing , how much harder it is to work with ( try doing legal discovery with mounds of paper ) , how much harder it is to share information , and how much it hurts the environment .
I 'm not targeting my anger at you per se , I 've just had to deal with too many people that want everyone else to spend more time and money working around their antique way of doing business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's fairly short-sighted and selfish do immediately disregard everyone that prints email as "stupid" or "just stubborn"

Not really:- Easier for them to read on paper than a monitor
e-ink display if eye strain is the issue, learn to use zoom if size is the issue.- They can easily annotate with corrective marks, shapes, arrows, comments
Tablet computer.
They can also forward their notes to everyone else without creating more paper.- Collate and file the message away with other paperwork
In a file folder that you have to thumb though while saying "I'm sure I have that email in here somewhere", rather than a folder system in your email that is accessible anywhere in the world that has a Internet connection?- Just don't like using computers for whatever reason and prefer a hard copy
Ok, explain how that isn't "stupid" or "just stubborn" considering how much cost is associated with printing, how much harder it is to work with (try doing legal discovery with mounds of paper), how much harder it is to share information, and how much it hurts the environment.
I'm not targeting my anger at you per se, I've just had to deal with too many people that want everyone else to spend more time and money working around their antique way of doing business.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629084</id>
	<title>Re:Why not laser print?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269628200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They can't do that. They took the lasers out of the laser printers for the sharks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They ca n't do that .
They took the lasers out of the laser printers for the sharks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They can't do that.
They took the lasers out of the laser printers for the sharks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627870</id>
	<title>Not a bad idea...</title>
	<author>eeg3</author>
	<datestamp>1269624540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>...if only for the fact that Century Gothic <a href="http://imgur.com/1bDHo.png" title="imgur.com">looks better</a> [imgur.com] than Arial.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...if only for the fact that Century Gothic looks better [ imgur.com ] than Arial .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...if only for the fact that Century Gothic looks better [imgur.com] than Arial.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628224</id>
	<title>Re:Not a bad idea...</title>
	<author>punit\_r</author>
	<datestamp>1269625500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...if only for the fact that Century Gothic <a href="http://imgur.com/1bDHo.png" title="imgur.com" rel="nofollow">looks better</a> [imgur.com] than Arial.</p></div><p>Thanks for the comparison. Now there is a new problem. The new font uses more space and hence resulting in more wastage of paper! Although there might be a valid argument saying 30\% saving of ink is more desirable as compared to 1 extra line every 8 lines.</p><p>All of this even if we ignore the fact that people print so many emails that a change of font is going to result in tangible savings. The article mentions the cost of ink per gallon. It would have been interesting to know the total ink consumption in gallons irrespective of the matter printed.</p><p>As per my personal experience as a grad student. I have printed only 5-10 emails in many years as compared to many many technical papers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...if only for the fact that Century Gothic looks better [ imgur.com ] than Arial.Thanks for the comparison .
Now there is a new problem .
The new font uses more space and hence resulting in more wastage of paper !
Although there might be a valid argument saying 30 \ % saving of ink is more desirable as compared to 1 extra line every 8 lines.All of this even if we ignore the fact that people print so many emails that a change of font is going to result in tangible savings .
The article mentions the cost of ink per gallon .
It would have been interesting to know the total ink consumption in gallons irrespective of the matter printed.As per my personal experience as a grad student .
I have printed only 5-10 emails in many years as compared to many many technical papers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...if only for the fact that Century Gothic looks better [imgur.com] than Arial.Thanks for the comparison.
Now there is a new problem.
The new font uses more space and hence resulting in more wastage of paper!
Although there might be a valid argument saying 30\% saving of ink is more desirable as compared to 1 extra line every 8 lines.All of this even if we ignore the fact that people print so many emails that a change of font is going to result in tangible savings.
The article mentions the cost of ink per gallon.
It would have been interesting to know the total ink consumption in gallons irrespective of the matter printed.As per my personal experience as a grad student.
I have printed only 5-10 emails in many years as compared to many many technical papers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630642</id>
	<title>Re:email?</title>
	<author>afidel</author>
	<datestamp>1269633780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's nothing, I have a floor with 6 black and white printers that are less than a year old and have 800k-1M impressions each. There's also a couple color printers on that floor with 350k and 500k impressions (though those are a couple years old).</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's nothing , I have a floor with 6 black and white printers that are less than a year old and have 800k-1M impressions each .
There 's also a couple color printers on that floor with 350k and 500k impressions ( though those are a couple years old ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's nothing, I have a floor with 6 black and white printers that are less than a year old and have 800k-1M impressions each.
There's also a couple color printers on that floor with 350k and 500k impressions (though those are a couple years old).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31654158</id>
	<title>Obligatory Dilbert</title>
	<author>Modern Primate</author>
	<datestamp>1269893760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Obligatory Dilbert...

<a href="http://www.dilbert.com/dyn/str\_strip/000000000/00000000/0000000/000000/10000/8000/300/18358/18358.strip.gif" title="dilbert.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dilbert.com/dyn/str\_strip/000000000/00000000/0000000/000000/10000/8000/300/18358/18358.strip.gif</a> [dilbert.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obligatory Dilbert.. . http : //www.dilbert.com/dyn/str \ _strip/000000000/00000000/0000000/000000/10000/8000/300/18358/18358.strip.gif [ dilbert.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obligatory Dilbert...

http://www.dilbert.com/dyn/str\_strip/000000000/00000000/0000000/000000/10000/8000/300/18358/18358.strip.gif [dilbert.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31635766</id>
	<title>Re:Why not laser print?</title>
	<author>davygrvy</author>
	<datestamp>1269616620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, seriously.  I was waiting for someone to mention this.  Why aren't inkjets banned?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , seriously .
I was waiting for someone to mention this .
Why are n't inkjets banned ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, seriously.
I was waiting for someone to mention this.
Why aren't inkjets banned?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627756</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31631278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31644664
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31653648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31636852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31640994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31634848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31633666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31636966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632060
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31633374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629376
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31633810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632606
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31638052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628604
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629446
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31635766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31631704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630500
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630642
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630166
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628230
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628672
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31634434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31631138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632200
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31631302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628828
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629812
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628160
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31634472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630276
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31644920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_26_1427217_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627850
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630276
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628654
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628296
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628302
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632308
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628638
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630782
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629376
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628300
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628614
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31640994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627878
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31634472
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31638052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628058
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629688
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31631302
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31644920
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31633666
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31633374
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31633810
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31636966
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31634434
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31636852
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31644664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629580
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630642
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632200
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628178
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31634848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31653648
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629092
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31631138
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629292
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628162
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628690
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630392
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632796
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628746
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628854
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31635766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628084
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632606
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628482
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629772
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628352
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630092
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627994
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31631278
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629156
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632560
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628444
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628872
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628224
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628604
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628518
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628540
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629236
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629270
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31632716
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630640
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630934
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31631704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628594
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31629020
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628462
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628022
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627746
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31630166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628760
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31627750
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_26_1427217.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_26_1427217.31628950
</commentlist>
</conversation>
