<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_25_1525208</id>
	<title>Facebook Leads To Increase In STDs in Britain</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1269533520000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>ectotherm writes <i>"According to Professor Peter Kelly, a director of Public Health in Great Britain: 'There has been <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyle/health/2010/03/25/2010-03-25\_facebook\_blamed\_for\_rising\_std\_rates\_in\_britain\_report.html">a four-fold increase in the number of syphilis cases</a> detected, with more young women being affected.'  Why the increase?  People meeting up for casual sex through Facebook.  According to the article, 'Social networking sites are making it easier for people to meet up for casual sex. There is a rise in syphilis because people are having more sexual partners than 20 years ago and often do not use condoms.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>ectotherm writes " According to Professor Peter Kelly , a director of Public Health in Great Britain : 'There has been a four-fold increase in the number of syphilis cases detected , with more young women being affected .
' Why the increase ?
People meeting up for casual sex through Facebook .
According to the article , 'Social networking sites are making it easier for people to meet up for casual sex .
There is a rise in syphilis because people are having more sexual partners than 20 years ago and often do not use condoms .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ectotherm writes "According to Professor Peter Kelly, a director of Public Health in Great Britain: 'There has been a four-fold increase in the number of syphilis cases detected, with more young women being affected.
'  Why the increase?
People meeting up for casual sex through Facebook.
According to the article, 'Social networking sites are making it easier for people to meet up for casual sex.
There is a rise in syphilis because people are having more sexual partners than 20 years ago and often do not use condoms.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614316</id>
	<title>what is that?</title>
	<author>roman\_mir</author>
	<datestamp>1269543480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is this s...se.... sekes?   What is this sekes you are talking about?  What is that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is this s...se.... sekes ? What is this sekes you are talking about ?
What is that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is this s...se.... sekes?   What is this sekes you are talking about?
What is that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613594</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong places</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1269541440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's those page 3 girls, I tell ya! That and Viagra, which has led to Brits keeping more than just their upper lip stiff!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's those page 3 girls , I tell ya !
That and Viagra , which has led to Brits keeping more than just their upper lip stiff !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's those page 3 girls, I tell ya!
That and Viagra, which has led to Brits keeping more than just their upper lip stiff!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612336</id>
	<title>Really?</title>
	<author>cbope</author>
	<datestamp>1269537540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, that's about as enlightening as saying bars and nightclubs lead to more casual sex. People socializing more, and it leads to sex? No shit. Doesn't really matter how the contact is made, does it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , that 's about as enlightening as saying bars and nightclubs lead to more casual sex .
People socializing more , and it leads to sex ?
No shit .
Does n't really matter how the contact is made , does it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, that's about as enlightening as saying bars and nightclubs lead to more casual sex.
People socializing more, and it leads to sex?
No shit.
Doesn't really matter how the contact is made, does it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612480</id>
	<title>ITDs</title>
	<author>strangeattraction</author>
	<datestamp>1269537960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Internet Transmitted Diseases: Who would have thought it possible.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Internet Transmitted Diseases : Who would have thought it possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Internet Transmitted Diseases: Who would have thought it possible.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31620114</id>
	<title>Re:C!=C</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269523740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Correlation is not causation.  <b>Facebook usage may correlate, but doesn't cause it.</b> </p><p>"Don't drink and park.  Accidents make people."</p></div><p>I'd love to see your data disproving causation in this scenario. Or are you just making a blind guess?</p><p>Just because "facebook usage may coorelate" you cannot take the logical leap and say that it "doesn't cause it"</p><p>Correlation is often a good grounds for doing a study to determine causation/non-causation.</p><p>People who don't understand what "correlation != causation" is supposed to convey should avoid using it.</p></div><p>... Uh... No it means you can argue either way.  It correlates so it might cause it or it might not but we can say it contributes.  So yes I can say it does not cause it but it does contribute to it.  Depending on the statistical significance of course.</p><p>Correlation != causation, you should avoid using it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Correlation is not causation .
Facebook usage may correlate , but does n't cause it .
" Do n't drink and park .
Accidents make people .
" I 'd love to see your data disproving causation in this scenario .
Or are you just making a blind guess ? Just because " facebook usage may coorelate " you can not take the logical leap and say that it " does n't cause it " Correlation is often a good grounds for doing a study to determine causation/non-causation.People who do n't understand what " correlation ! = causation " is supposed to convey should avoid using it.... Uh... No it means you can argue either way .
It correlates so it might cause it or it might not but we can say it contributes .
So yes I can say it does not cause it but it does contribute to it .
Depending on the statistical significance of course.Correlation ! = causation , you should avoid using it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correlation is not causation.
Facebook usage may correlate, but doesn't cause it.
"Don't drink and park.
Accidents make people.
"I'd love to see your data disproving causation in this scenario.
Or are you just making a blind guess?Just because "facebook usage may coorelate" you cannot take the logical leap and say that it "doesn't cause it"Correlation is often a good grounds for doing a study to determine causation/non-causation.People who don't understand what "correlation != causation" is supposed to convey should avoid using it.... Uh... No it means you can argue either way.
It correlates so it might cause it or it might not but we can say it contributes.
So yes I can say it does not cause it but it does contribute to it.
Depending on the statistical significance of course.Correlation != causation, you should avoid using it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613904</id>
	<title>Facebook Suggestions</title>
	<author>Tetsujin</author>
	<datestamp>1269542280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><strong>Herpes</strong><br>120 of your friends are members<br>Join This Group</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Herpes120 of your friends are membersJoin This Group</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Herpes120 of your friends are membersJoin This Group</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614250</id>
	<title>Re:C!=C</title>
	<author>jlintern</author>
	<datestamp>1269543300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read the GP as <i>"Facebook usage may correlate, but doesn't <b>necessarily</b> cause [increased STD rates]."</i> In which case it would be perfectly correct.</p><p>Regardless, <i>any</i> discussion of causation based on the information provided in TFA is completely worthless. It simply says that there is <i>geographical</i> correlation between Facebook use and STD rates, that <i>some</i> people with Syphilis have had sex with people they met online, and that people who meet over the internet are more likely to engage in "risky" behavior.</p><p>The titles "Facebook Leads to Increase in STDs in Britain" (/.) and "Facebook blamed for rising STD rates in Britain" (TFA) both imply causation when in fact none has been shown. I think this is what the GP was pointing out. I'm sure you'll find plenty more alternate theories of causation in other threads.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read the GP as " Facebook usage may correlate , but does n't necessarily cause [ increased STD rates ] .
" In which case it would be perfectly correct.Regardless , any discussion of causation based on the information provided in TFA is completely worthless .
It simply says that there is geographical correlation between Facebook use and STD rates , that some people with Syphilis have had sex with people they met online , and that people who meet over the internet are more likely to engage in " risky " behavior.The titles " Facebook Leads to Increase in STDs in Britain " ( / .
) and " Facebook blamed for rising STD rates in Britain " ( TFA ) both imply causation when in fact none has been shown .
I think this is what the GP was pointing out .
I 'm sure you 'll find plenty more alternate theories of causation in other threads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read the GP as "Facebook usage may correlate, but doesn't necessarily cause [increased STD rates].
" In which case it would be perfectly correct.Regardless, any discussion of causation based on the information provided in TFA is completely worthless.
It simply says that there is geographical correlation between Facebook use and STD rates, that some people with Syphilis have had sex with people they met online, and that people who meet over the internet are more likely to engage in "risky" behavior.The titles "Facebook Leads to Increase in STDs in Britain" (/.
) and "Facebook blamed for rising STD rates in Britain" (TFA) both imply causation when in fact none has been shown.
I think this is what the GP was pointing out.
I'm sure you'll find plenty more alternate theories of causation in other threads.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613614</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong places</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1269541500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not sure.  There's a "poke" feature, you can try that and see if it works for you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not sure .
There 's a " poke " feature , you can try that and see if it works for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not sure.
There's a "poke" feature, you can try that and see if it works for you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614018</id>
	<title>Re:C!=C</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269542580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Camera-cell phone use correlates just as well. Are you saying Facebook is a more cause likely than camera cell phones?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Camera-cell phone use correlates just as well .
Are you saying Facebook is a more cause likely than camera cell phones ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Camera-cell phone use correlates just as well.
Are you saying Facebook is a more cause likely than camera cell phones?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613688</id>
	<title>Re:C!=C</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269541740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Failure to use condoms is leading to a rise in STDs. Facebook is just helping more people have sex.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Failure to use condoms is leading to a rise in STDs .
Facebook is just helping more people have sex .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Failure to use condoms is leading to a rise in STDs.
Facebook is just helping more people have sex.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612714</id>
	<title>Less Focus on Facebook...</title>
	<author>dhermann</author>
	<datestamp>1269538740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Director of Public Health in Great Britain? So this guy is in charge of their teeth, too, right? I think he may want to stop spending time on Facebook and more time looking into that... situation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Director of Public Health in Great Britain ?
So this guy is in charge of their teeth , too , right ?
I think he may want to stop spending time on Facebook and more time looking into that... situation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Director of Public Health in Great Britain?
So this guy is in charge of their teeth, too, right?
I think he may want to stop spending time on Facebook and more time looking into that... situation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613486</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>ffejie</author>
	<datestamp>1269541140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If everyone used condoms all the time, we also wouldn't have that other problem of reproducing. We could solve a lot of problems if we just let all the humans expire. I figure it would take about 75 years or so.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If everyone used condoms all the time , we also would n't have that other problem of reproducing .
We could solve a lot of problems if we just let all the humans expire .
I figure it would take about 75 years or so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If everyone used condoms all the time, we also wouldn't have that other problem of reproducing.
We could solve a lot of problems if we just let all the humans expire.
I figure it would take about 75 years or so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31617370</id>
	<title>They just need a panic button for this.</title>
	<author>TermV</author>
	<datestamp>1269510360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They need to add a button to Facebook so that if anybody feels like they're going to get the clap, they can push it and immediately generate a medical response.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They need to add a button to Facebook so that if anybody feels like they 're going to get the clap , they can push it and immediately generate a medical response .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They need to add a button to Facebook so that if anybody feels like they're going to get the clap, they can push it and immediately generate a medical response.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613926</id>
	<title>Re:Facebook?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269542340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since this is about the UK, the obvious part would also contain the amount of English sluts...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since this is about the UK , the obvious part would also contain the amount of English sluts.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since this is about the UK, the obvious part would also contain the amount of English sluts...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302</id>
	<title>C!=C</title>
	<author>Sta7ic</author>
	<datestamp>1269537420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Correlation is not causation.  Facebook usage may correlate, but doesn't cause it.</p><p>"Don't drink and park.  Accidents make people."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Correlation is not causation .
Facebook usage may correlate , but does n't cause it .
" Do n't drink and park .
Accidents make people .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correlation is not causation.
Facebook usage may correlate, but doesn't cause it.
"Don't drink and park.
Accidents make people.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613664</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269541680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...I wouldn't say this is a problem with Facebook so much as a problem with fucking stupidity. It's not my place to question someone's sexual activity, but come on...who has sex with a stranger without using a condom?</p></div><p>Is there a real difference between a stranger and someone you've known for a couple of weeks or months?</p><p>Have you ever - has anyone ever - told your partner-to-be, "hey sweety, before we do the wild thing, let's get tested for STDs"? I guess that depends on the culture, but in my (sad) experience, it's usually met by "you don't trust me?!" and "fuck off, you moron".</p><p>To make things worse, and I swear to god I'm not making this up, I can't wear condoms. My penis is well over the average diameter/girth, and to this day, I haven't found a single condom that I could use. I can't roll it on; I have to stretch it around slowly, and when doing that doesn't kill my erection, the condom eventually breaks; either when I'm placing it, or soon after penetration. That is, if I even get to penetrate a woman. I've had a couple of relationships go bad because sex was physically impossible, others broke because it was unpleasant for my partners. Blowjobs? More like lickjobs.</p><p>Am I irresponsible for not wearing a condom? Yes... I'm perfectly aware of that. On the other hand, I'd die a virgin otherwise. The best I can do is hope for the best. It's not like I'm promiscuous or something.</p><p>Anyway, this went completely offtopic, so I'd just like to say that people should be happy that they *can* wear condoms and that they *can* have sex. I'm in my thirties, and I'm in my single digits (and I'm not talking about the number of partners). At least get tested for HIV, people, because if you get that, your sex life is going to be like mine - totally fucked up (pun intended)... And you really don't want that.</p><p>Be smart.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...I would n't say this is a problem with Facebook so much as a problem with fucking stupidity .
It 's not my place to question someone 's sexual activity , but come on...who has sex with a stranger without using a condom ? Is there a real difference between a stranger and someone you 've known for a couple of weeks or months ? Have you ever - has anyone ever - told your partner-to-be , " hey sweety , before we do the wild thing , let 's get tested for STDs " ?
I guess that depends on the culture , but in my ( sad ) experience , it 's usually met by " you do n't trust me ? !
" and " fuck off , you moron " .To make things worse , and I swear to god I 'm not making this up , I ca n't wear condoms .
My penis is well over the average diameter/girth , and to this day , I have n't found a single condom that I could use .
I ca n't roll it on ; I have to stretch it around slowly , and when doing that does n't kill my erection , the condom eventually breaks ; either when I 'm placing it , or soon after penetration .
That is , if I even get to penetrate a woman .
I 've had a couple of relationships go bad because sex was physically impossible , others broke because it was unpleasant for my partners .
Blowjobs ? More like lickjobs.Am I irresponsible for not wearing a condom ?
Yes... I 'm perfectly aware of that .
On the other hand , I 'd die a virgin otherwise .
The best I can do is hope for the best .
It 's not like I 'm promiscuous or something.Anyway , this went completely offtopic , so I 'd just like to say that people should be happy that they * can * wear condoms and that they * can * have sex .
I 'm in my thirties , and I 'm in my single digits ( and I 'm not talking about the number of partners ) .
At least get tested for HIV , people , because if you get that , your sex life is going to be like mine - totally fucked up ( pun intended ) ... And you really do n't want that.Be smart .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...I wouldn't say this is a problem with Facebook so much as a problem with fucking stupidity.
It's not my place to question someone's sexual activity, but come on...who has sex with a stranger without using a condom?Is there a real difference between a stranger and someone you've known for a couple of weeks or months?Have you ever - has anyone ever - told your partner-to-be, "hey sweety, before we do the wild thing, let's get tested for STDs"?
I guess that depends on the culture, but in my (sad) experience, it's usually met by "you don't trust me?!
" and "fuck off, you moron".To make things worse, and I swear to god I'm not making this up, I can't wear condoms.
My penis is well over the average diameter/girth, and to this day, I haven't found a single condom that I could use.
I can't roll it on; I have to stretch it around slowly, and when doing that doesn't kill my erection, the condom eventually breaks; either when I'm placing it, or soon after penetration.
That is, if I even get to penetrate a woman.
I've had a couple of relationships go bad because sex was physically impossible, others broke because it was unpleasant for my partners.
Blowjobs? More like lickjobs.Am I irresponsible for not wearing a condom?
Yes... I'm perfectly aware of that.
On the other hand, I'd die a virgin otherwise.
The best I can do is hope for the best.
It's not like I'm promiscuous or something.Anyway, this went completely offtopic, so I'd just like to say that people should be happy that they *can* wear condoms and that they *can* have sex.
I'm in my thirties, and I'm in my single digits (and I'm not talking about the number of partners).
At least get tested for HIV, people, because if you get that, your sex life is going to be like mine - totally fucked up (pun intended)... And you really don't want that.Be smart.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612438</id>
	<title>UK</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269537780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, it's the UK, so I doubt I'd be the first:</p><p>"Ban Facebook now!"<br>"They're corrupting our innocent children"<br>"It's all the work of secret terrorist pedophiles... we must root them out by recording all facebook conversations and having a central database"</p><p>Sounds good?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , it 's the UK , so I doubt I 'd be the first : " Ban Facebook now !
" " They 're corrupting our innocent children " " It 's all the work of secret terrorist pedophiles... we must root them out by recording all facebook conversations and having a central database " Sounds good ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, it's the UK, so I doubt I'd be the first:"Ban Facebook now!
""They're corrupting our innocent children""It's all the work of secret terrorist pedophiles... we must root them out by recording all facebook conversations and having a central database"Sounds good?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612282</id>
	<title>Don't forget Britain's refugee problem.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269537360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Britain lets in far too many third-world refugees and immigrants. We're talking people from the poorest regions of Africa, like Somalia, Ethiopia, and Angola, and other places like the Middle East and India.</p><p>The levels have been on the rise over the past five years or so. Who knows what sort of diseases they may be bringing with them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Britain lets in far too many third-world refugees and immigrants .
We 're talking people from the poorest regions of Africa , like Somalia , Ethiopia , and Angola , and other places like the Middle East and India.The levels have been on the rise over the past five years or so .
Who knows what sort of diseases they may be bringing with them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Britain lets in far too many third-world refugees and immigrants.
We're talking people from the poorest regions of Africa, like Somalia, Ethiopia, and Angola, and other places like the Middle East and India.The levels have been on the rise over the past five years or so.
Who knows what sort of diseases they may be bringing with them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613976</id>
	<title>Re:You heard it here first, folks:</title>
	<author>NotBornYesterday</author>
	<datestamp>1269542520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, and chances are they <a href="http://it.slashdot.org/story/10/03/25/1243241/Millions-Continue-To-Click-On-Spam?art\_pos=8" title="slashdot.org">don't use</a> [slashdot.org] (or don't know how to use) anything else that might prevent infection.  What is it about using computers that makes people think "It won't happen to me"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , and chances are they do n't use [ slashdot.org ] ( or do n't know how to use ) anything else that might prevent infection .
What is it about using computers that makes people think " It wo n't happen to me " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, and chances are they don't use [slashdot.org] (or don't know how to use) anything else that might prevent infection.
What is it about using computers that makes people think "It won't happen to me"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612568</id>
	<title>Re:Damn</title>
	<author>K. S. Kyosuke</author>
	<datestamp>1269538320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>HHGG would probably say that on planet Earth, social networking subsumes sexual networking.</htmltext>
<tokenext>HHGG would probably say that on planet Earth , social networking subsumes sexual networking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>HHGG would probably say that on planet Earth, social networking subsumes sexual networking.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612762</id>
	<title>Fp 6nnaa</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269538860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">anything can rules are This head spinning yo0 have a play may also want FreeBSD used to Little-known I read the latest balance is struck, prima donnas to those uber-asshole reaper Nor do the Fear the reaper the resources that I thought it was my play parties the triumphs would soon Out of business survival prospects market. Therefore, current core were developers. The in a head spinning To predict *BSD's available to Are 7000 users there are Of the above the gay niggers had become like (7000+1400+700)*4 posts on Usenet are of OpenBSD versus Knows for sure what are tied up in clothes or be a go find something BSD's acclaimed RAM) for about 20 To its laid-back some of you have they started to people already; I'm THE TIME TO MEET bleak future. In</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>anything can rules are This head spinning yo0 have a play may also want FreeBSD used to Little-known I read the latest balance is struck , prima donnas to those uber-asshole reaper Nor do the Fear the reaper the resources that I thought it was my play parties the triumphs would soon Out of business survival prospects market .
Therefore , current core were developers .
The in a head spinning To predict * BSD 's available to Are 7000 users there are Of the above the gay niggers had become like ( 7000 + 1400 + 700 ) * 4 posts on Usenet are of OpenBSD versus Knows for sure what are tied up in clothes or be a go find something BSD 's acclaimed RAM ) for about 20 To its laid-back some of you have they started to people already ; I 'm THE TIME TO MEET bleak future .
In [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>anything can rules are This head spinning yo0 have a play may also want FreeBSD used to Little-known I read the latest balance is struck, prima donnas to those uber-asshole reaper Nor do the Fear the reaper the resources that I thought it was my play parties the triumphs would soon Out of business survival prospects market.
Therefore, current core were developers.
The in a head spinning To predict *BSD's available to Are 7000 users there are Of the above the gay niggers had become like (7000+1400+700)*4 posts on Usenet are of OpenBSD versus Knows for sure what are tied up in clothes or be a go find something BSD's acclaimed RAM) for about 20 To its laid-back some of you have they started to people already; I'm THE TIME TO MEET bleak future.
In [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614110</id>
	<title>The original article didn't mention Facebook</title>
	<author>alanw</author>
	<datestamp>1269542820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's an article in the local press of March 19th:</p><p><a href="http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/2010/03/19/syphilis-cases-rise-400-on-teesside-84229-26067098/" title="gazettelive.co.uk">http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/2010/03/19/syphilis-cases-rise-400-on-teesside-84229-26067098/</a> [gazettelive.co.uk]</p><p>No mention of Facebook.</p><p>There was then an article on the 24th in The Daily Telegraph:</p><p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/7508945/Facebook-linked-to-rise-in-syphilis.html" title="telegraph.co.uk">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/7508945/Facebook-linked-to-rise-in-syphilis.html</a> [telegraph.co.uk]</p><p>Again, no direct claim that Facebook was responsible, just an unsubstantiated paragraph stating that</p><p><i><br>Case have increased fourfold in Sunderland, Durham and Teesside, the areas of Britain where Facebook is most popular.<br></i> [sic]</p><p>There was another instance recently where Facebook are threatening to sue the Daily Mail</p><p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/mar/11/facebook-daily-mail" title="guardian.co.uk">http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/mar/11/facebook-daily-mail</a> [guardian.co.uk]</p><p>after the Mail took some general research into unnamed social networking sites and attributed the dangers specifically to Facebook.</p><p>I would think it far more likely that AdultFriendFinder or GetItOn would be responsible for any increase in STDs, and that it's bad journalists seeking to sensationalise stories, by trying to make them more familiar and relevant to their readers, who are using Facebook as a synonym for any social networking site.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's an article in the local press of March 19th : http : //www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/2010/03/19/syphilis-cases-rise-400-on-teesside-84229-26067098/ [ gazettelive.co.uk ] No mention of Facebook.There was then an article on the 24th in The Daily Telegraph : http : //www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/7508945/Facebook-linked-to-rise-in-syphilis.html [ telegraph.co.uk ] Again , no direct claim that Facebook was responsible , just an unsubstantiated paragraph stating thatCase have increased fourfold in Sunderland , Durham and Teesside , the areas of Britain where Facebook is most popular .
[ sic ] There was another instance recently where Facebook are threatening to sue the Daily Mailhttp : //www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/mar/11/facebook-daily-mail [ guardian.co.uk ] after the Mail took some general research into unnamed social networking sites and attributed the dangers specifically to Facebook.I would think it far more likely that AdultFriendFinder or GetItOn would be responsible for any increase in STDs , and that it 's bad journalists seeking to sensationalise stories , by trying to make them more familiar and relevant to their readers , who are using Facebook as a synonym for any social networking site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's an article in the local press of March 19th:http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/2010/03/19/syphilis-cases-rise-400-on-teesside-84229-26067098/ [gazettelive.co.uk]No mention of Facebook.There was then an article on the 24th in The Daily Telegraph:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/7508945/Facebook-linked-to-rise-in-syphilis.html [telegraph.co.uk]Again, no direct claim that Facebook was responsible, just an unsubstantiated paragraph stating thatCase have increased fourfold in Sunderland, Durham and Teesside, the areas of Britain where Facebook is most popular.
[sic]There was another instance recently where Facebook are threatening to sue the Daily Mailhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/mar/11/facebook-daily-mail [guardian.co.uk]after the Mail took some general research into unnamed social networking sites and attributed the dangers specifically to Facebook.I would think it far more likely that AdultFriendFinder or GetItOn would be responsible for any increase in STDs, and that it's bad journalists seeking to sensationalise stories, by trying to make them more familiar and relevant to their readers, who are using Facebook as a synonym for any social networking site.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31623710</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong places</title>
	<author>RivenAleem</author>
	<datestamp>1269602820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"There has been a four-fold increase in the number of syphilis cases detected, with more young women being affected"</p><p>Facebook has caused an additional 3 people to contract syphilis. Further updates at 11.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" There has been a four-fold increase in the number of syphilis cases detected , with more young women being affected " Facebook has caused an additional 3 people to contract syphilis .
Further updates at 11 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"There has been a four-fold increase in the number of syphilis cases detected, with more young women being affected"Facebook has caused an additional 3 people to contract syphilis.
Further updates at 11.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612544</id>
	<title>Syphilisbook</title>
	<author>Aphoxema</author>
	<datestamp>1269538200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, at least it isn't something that's untreatable.</p><p>Come back when you find a correlation with herpes, because Herpesbook has a better ring that Syphilisbook. You can also turn it into Faceherpes, but Treponema pallidum can't really find a good place to live on the face.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , at least it is n't something that 's untreatable.Come back when you find a correlation with herpes , because Herpesbook has a better ring that Syphilisbook .
You can also turn it into Faceherpes , but Treponema pallidum ca n't really find a good place to live on the face .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, at least it isn't something that's untreatable.Come back when you find a correlation with herpes, because Herpesbook has a better ring that Syphilisbook.
You can also turn it into Faceherpes, but Treponema pallidum can't really find a good place to live on the face.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614966</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong places</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269545580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>and more importantly, can you teach us Americans how to be a little less puritanical?</p></div></blockquote><p>
<a href="http://www.jewishsightseeing.com/jewish\_humor/punchlines\_and\_their\_jokes/2006-06-01-Number\%2039.htm" title="jewishsightseeing.com" rel="nofollow">Let me look at that map again</a> [jewishsightseeing.com].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and more importantly , can you teach us Americans how to be a little less puritanical ?
Let me look at that map again [ jewishsightseeing.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and more importantly, can you teach us Americans how to be a little less puritanical?
Let me look at that map again [jewishsightseeing.com].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615724</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>an unsound mind</author>
	<datestamp>1269548160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have seen several people ask their partners to get a STD check together pre-sex. I live in northern Europe though.</p><p>Not such a big deal here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have seen several people ask their partners to get a STD check together pre-sex .
I live in northern Europe though.Not such a big deal here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have seen several people ask their partners to get a STD check together pre-sex.
I live in northern Europe though.Not such a big deal here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614554</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong places</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1269544440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The UK is the nation that gave us Benny Hill.  The US is the nation where the Benny Hill show could only be seen on <em>educational television</em>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The UK is the nation that gave us Benny Hill .
The US is the nation where the Benny Hill show could only be seen on educational television .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The UK is the nation that gave us Benny Hill.
The US is the nation where the Benny Hill show could only be seen on educational television.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31617202</id>
	<title>Re:C!=C</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269509760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'd love to see your data disproving causation in this scenario. Or are you just making a blind guess?</p><p>Just because "facebook usage may coorelate" you cannot take the logical leap and say that it "doesn't cause it"</p><p>Correlation is often a good grounds for doing a study to determine causation/non-causation.</p><p>People who don't understand what "correlation != causation" is supposed to convey should avoid using it.</p></div><p>but if you read the article you will see that there is no empirical evidence supporting the conclusion of causation.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd love to see your data disproving causation in this scenario .
Or are you just making a blind guess ? Just because " facebook usage may coorelate " you can not take the logical leap and say that it " does n't cause it " Correlation is often a good grounds for doing a study to determine causation/non-causation.People who do n't understand what " correlation ! = causation " is supposed to convey should avoid using it.but if you read the article you will see that there is no empirical evidence supporting the conclusion of causation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd love to see your data disproving causation in this scenario.
Or are you just making a blind guess?Just because "facebook usage may coorelate" you cannot take the logical leap and say that it "doesn't cause it"Correlation is often a good grounds for doing a study to determine causation/non-causation.People who don't understand what "correlation != causation" is supposed to convey should avoid using it.but if you read the article you will see that there is no empirical evidence supporting the conclusion of causation.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612628</id>
	<title>Facebook?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269538500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll state the obvious then.</p><p>This is about sex education and access to reproductive health services/products. Facebook is just a way to shift blame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll state the obvious then.This is about sex education and access to reproductive health services/products .
Facebook is just a way to shift blame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll state the obvious then.This is about sex education and access to reproductive health services/products.
Facebook is just a way to shift blame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615126</id>
	<title>Fucking leads to increased STDs in Britain</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1269546180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>There, I fixed the headline for you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There , I fixed the headline for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There, I fixed the headline for you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31617524</id>
	<title>Re:C!=C</title>
	<author>CoffeeDog</author>
	<datestamp>1269511020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They didn't use the correlation to prove causation, they actually asked people "hey how'd you get the clap" and a lot of them said "I hooked up with a stranger on Facebook". That is the causation right there, the correlation came after.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They did n't use the correlation to prove causation , they actually asked people " hey how 'd you get the clap " and a lot of them said " I hooked up with a stranger on Facebook " .
That is the causation right there , the correlation came after .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They didn't use the correlation to prove causation, they actually asked people "hey how'd you get the clap" and a lot of them said "I hooked up with a stranger on Facebook".
That is the causation right there, the correlation came after.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613270</id>
	<title>Re:C!=C</title>
	<author>MrHanky</author>
	<datestamp>1269540480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, how "insightful"! Did you learn about that on Slashdot?</p><p>Did it occur to you that maybe the patients diagnosed with syphilis were questioned about their sex life? Why the fuck is this idiocy always modded up on this site?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , how " insightful " !
Did you learn about that on Slashdot ? Did it occur to you that maybe the patients diagnosed with syphilis were questioned about their sex life ?
Why the fuck is this idiocy always modded up on this site ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, how "insightful"!
Did you learn about that on Slashdot?Did it occur to you that maybe the patients diagnosed with syphilis were questioned about their sex life?
Why the fuck is this idiocy always modded up on this site?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614870</id>
	<title>Re:Public awareness campaign</title>
	<author>rgviza</author>
	<datestamp>1269545340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't that be a Pubic awareness campaign?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't that be a Pubic awareness campaign ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't that be a Pubic awareness campaign?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614016</id>
	<title>Toothing anyone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269542580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Children, try to remember that history repeats itself here: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toothing" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toothing</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>This hoax worked because the people wanted to believe. So here we go again. The usual "The Internet is evil"-fodder for the water cooler on friday, a.k.a. nothing new here, moving on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Children , try to remember that history repeats itself here : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toothing [ wikipedia.org ] This hoax worked because the people wanted to believe .
So here we go again .
The usual " The Internet is evil " -fodder for the water cooler on friday , a.k.a .
nothing new here , moving on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Children, try to remember that history repeats itself here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toothing [wikipedia.org]This hoax worked because the people wanted to believe.
So here we go again.
The usual "The Internet is evil"-fodder for the water cooler on friday, a.k.a.
nothing new here, moving on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613662</id>
	<title>POF</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269541680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm from England, I don't have a Facebook account.  I did use plentyoffish.com, that's where I got my STDs from anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm from England , I do n't have a Facebook account .
I did use plentyoffish.com , that 's where I got my STDs from anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm from England, I don't have a Facebook account.
I did use plentyoffish.com, that's where I got my STDs from anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614646</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>xero314</author>
	<datestamp>1269544680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>who has sex with a stranger without using a condom?</p></div><p>Because not everyone knows that once you get to know someone they can't transfer STDs to you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>who has sex with a stranger without using a condom ? Because not everyone knows that once you get to know someone they ca n't transfer STDs to you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>who has sex with a stranger without using a condom?Because not everyone knows that once you get to know someone they can't transfer STDs to you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612280</id>
	<title>What?</title>
	<author>Em Emalb</author>
	<datestamp>1269537360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>lolwut?  facebook/myspace/craigslist/etc/etc/etc.</p><p>But hey, a lot of people are on facebook, let's blame it on that.</p><p>Vanessa Kensington: Mr. Powers, my job is to acclimatize you to the nineties. You know, a lot's changed since 1967.<br>Austin Powers: No doubt, love, but as long as people are still having promiscuous sex with many anonymous partners without protection while at the same time experimenting with mind-expanding drugs in a consequence-free environment, I'll be sound as a pound!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>lolwut ?
facebook/myspace/craigslist/etc/etc/etc.But hey , a lot of people are on facebook , let 's blame it on that.Vanessa Kensington : Mr. Powers , my job is to acclimatize you to the nineties .
You know , a lot 's changed since 1967.Austin Powers : No doubt , love , but as long as people are still having promiscuous sex with many anonymous partners without protection while at the same time experimenting with mind-expanding drugs in a consequence-free environment , I 'll be sound as a pound !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lolwut?
facebook/myspace/craigslist/etc/etc/etc.But hey, a lot of people are on facebook, let's blame it on that.Vanessa Kensington: Mr. Powers, my job is to acclimatize you to the nineties.
You know, a lot's changed since 1967.Austin Powers: No doubt, love, but as long as people are still having promiscuous sex with many anonymous partners without protection while at the same time experimenting with mind-expanding drugs in a consequence-free environment, I'll be sound as a pound!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615678</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong places</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269548040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry to tell you this, but the common prejudice here in Germany, is that the average UK girls is a fuck-ugly fatass.<br>(Not my judgment. I&rsquo;m just the messenger of prejudiced people.)<br>Although I must admit, everyone of my friends who went there, had to emphasize that this is true.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry to tell you this , but the common prejudice here in Germany , is that the average UK girls is a fuck-ugly fatass .
( Not my judgment .
I    m just the messenger of prejudiced people .
) Although I must admit , everyone of my friends who went there , had to emphasize that this is true .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry to tell you this, but the common prejudice here in Germany, is that the average UK girls is a fuck-ugly fatass.
(Not my judgment.
I’m just the messenger of prejudiced people.
)Although I must admit, everyone of my friends who went there, had to emphasize that this is true.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613028</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269539640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes and if everyone used them we'd be wiped out as a species in one generation.  =).  No people = No AIDS</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes and if everyone used them we 'd be wiped out as a species in one generation .
= ) . No people = No AIDS</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes and if everyone used them we'd be wiped out as a species in one generation.
=).  No people = No AIDS</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31624328</id>
	<title>Safe Social Netwroking campaing</title>
	<author>Optali</author>
	<datestamp>1269608820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I recommend putting a condom on the monitor.

Another safe way to avoid STDs is not using Facebook at all and go directly to the pr0n sites!!!

(recommended by the pr0n webmaster association)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I recommend putting a condom on the monitor .
Another safe way to avoid STDs is not using Facebook at all and go directly to the pr0n sites ! ! !
( recommended by the pr0n webmaster association )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I recommend putting a condom on the monitor.
Another safe way to avoid STDs is not using Facebook at all and go directly to the pr0n sites!!!
(recommended by the pr0n webmaster association)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612838</id>
	<title>syphilis cycles</title>
	<author>GayBliss</author>
	<datestamp>1269539040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is also the theory of syphilis cycles, that have little to do with a change in sexual behaviors by the masses:
<p>
<a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6935-syphilis-cycles-not-driven-by-risky-sex.html" title="newscientist.com">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6935-syphilis-cycles-not-driven-by-risky-sex.html</a> [newscientist.com]
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is also the theory of syphilis cycles , that have little to do with a change in sexual behaviors by the masses : http : //www.newscientist.com/article/dn6935-syphilis-cycles-not-driven-by-risky-sex.html [ newscientist.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is also the theory of syphilis cycles, that have little to do with a change in sexual behaviors by the masses:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6935-syphilis-cycles-not-driven-by-risky-sex.html [newscientist.com]
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612352</id>
	<title>Um...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269537600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...I wouldn't say this is a problem with Facebook so much as a problem with fucking stupidity.  It's not my place to question someone's sexual activity, but come on...who has sex with a stranger without using a condom?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...I would n't say this is a problem with Facebook so much as a problem with fucking stupidity .
It 's not my place to question someone 's sexual activity , but come on...who has sex with a stranger without using a condom ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I wouldn't say this is a problem with Facebook so much as a problem with fucking stupidity.
It's not my place to question someone's sexual activity, but come on...who has sex with a stranger without using a condom?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612398</id>
	<title>..as reported by Murdoch's newspapers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269537660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>...as they pointedly do NOT mention MySpace.  Hmm. Wonder why that could be, NewsCorp?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...as they pointedly do NOT mention MySpace .
Hmm. Wonder why that could be , NewsCorp ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...as they pointedly do NOT mention MySpace.
Hmm. Wonder why that could be, NewsCorp?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613168</id>
	<title>I've Never Had Casual Sex</title>
	<author>mindbrane</author>
	<datestamp>1269540180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pleading, desperate, begging, even grovelling sex, sure, that's pretty much my norm, but casual, no. My ex, I'm pretty sure she had a lot of casual sex, even disinterested sex, at least it seemed that way to me, but then I really didn't care. I was just so grateful just to be getting some.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pleading , desperate , begging , even grovelling sex , sure , that 's pretty much my norm , but casual , no .
My ex , I 'm pretty sure she had a lot of casual sex , even disinterested sex , at least it seemed that way to me , but then I really did n't care .
I was just so grateful just to be getting some .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pleading, desperate, begging, even grovelling sex, sure, that's pretty much my norm, but casual, no.
My ex, I'm pretty sure she had a lot of casual sex, even disinterested sex, at least it seemed that way to me, but then I really didn't care.
I was just so grateful just to be getting some.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614444</id>
	<title>Re:C!=C</title>
	<author>CharlyFoxtrot</author>
	<datestamp>1269543960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Correlation is not causation.  Facebook usage may correlate, but doesn't cause it.</p></div><p>Yeah, they are blaming the <i>tool</i> these people are using to hook up. Might as well blame the telephone or sexting or the back-alleys these idiots are getting it on in. My guess would be that that part of the UK already hit hard by the industrial decline got hit harder by the recession and a lot of people are bored AND some idiot is running around infected and not giving a damn. Of course that doesn't sell papers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Correlation is not causation .
Facebook usage may correlate , but does n't cause it.Yeah , they are blaming the tool these people are using to hook up .
Might as well blame the telephone or sexting or the back-alleys these idiots are getting it on in .
My guess would be that that part of the UK already hit hard by the industrial decline got hit harder by the recession and a lot of people are bored AND some idiot is running around infected and not giving a damn .
Of course that does n't sell papers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correlation is not causation.
Facebook usage may correlate, but doesn't cause it.Yeah, they are blaming the tool these people are using to hook up.
Might as well blame the telephone or sexting or the back-alleys these idiots are getting it on in.
My guess would be that that part of the UK already hit hard by the industrial decline got hit harder by the recession and a lot of people are bored AND some idiot is running around infected and not giving a damn.
Of course that doesn't sell papers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615858</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong places</title>
	<author>aztektum</author>
	<datestamp>1269548700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Giggity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Giggity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Giggity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612238</id>
	<title>Damn</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269537240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dammit so I didn't have to sign up for fuckbook?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dammit so I did n't have to sign up for fuckbook ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dammit so I didn't have to sign up for fuckbook?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614258</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>Creepy</author>
	<datestamp>1269543300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except junkies sharing needles is a major spreader of HIV/AIDS.  Putting a condom on a needle seems a tad counterproductive.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Incidentally, I've known two people that have contracted STDs, one is gay and is HIV positive from screwing around, and the other was a punker that moonlighted as a gigolo while in high school (and he contracted gonorrhea that way - he was also on most forms of drug and probably sharing needles, but all I know from hearsay is he went to rehab and cleaned up after high school).  I imagine prostitutes of any kind are a major purveyor of STDs because their job is to screw around and in many cases, neither the prostitute or the john/jane is tested.</p><p>The cure is much simpler - avoid drugs and transfusions and only have sex with virgins who also have not used drugs or had transfusions (yes, I know the chances of getting HIV is very low through transfusions these days, but you can't take any chances, right?).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except junkies sharing needles is a major spreader of HIV/AIDS .
Putting a condom on a needle seems a tad counterproductive .
    Incidentally , I 've known two people that have contracted STDs , one is gay and is HIV positive from screwing around , and the other was a punker that moonlighted as a gigolo while in high school ( and he contracted gonorrhea that way - he was also on most forms of drug and probably sharing needles , but all I know from hearsay is he went to rehab and cleaned up after high school ) .
I imagine prostitutes of any kind are a major purveyor of STDs because their job is to screw around and in many cases , neither the prostitute or the john/jane is tested.The cure is much simpler - avoid drugs and transfusions and only have sex with virgins who also have not used drugs or had transfusions ( yes , I know the chances of getting HIV is very low through transfusions these days , but you ca n't take any chances , right ?
) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except junkies sharing needles is a major spreader of HIV/AIDS.
Putting a condom on a needle seems a tad counterproductive.
    Incidentally, I've known two people that have contracted STDs, one is gay and is HIV positive from screwing around, and the other was a punker that moonlighted as a gigolo while in high school (and he contracted gonorrhea that way - he was also on most forms of drug and probably sharing needles, but all I know from hearsay is he went to rehab and cleaned up after high school).
I imagine prostitutes of any kind are a major purveyor of STDs because their job is to screw around and in many cases, neither the prostitute or the john/jane is tested.The cure is much simpler - avoid drugs and transfusions and only have sex with virgins who also have not used drugs or had transfusions (yes, I know the chances of getting HIV is very low through transfusions these days, but you can't take any chances, right?
).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613134</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269540060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>gosh why on earth would you WANT to use a condom?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>gosh why on earth would you WANT to use a condom ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>gosh why on earth would you WANT to use a condom?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613370</id>
	<title>Yea right</title>
	<author>ickleberry</author>
	<datestamp>1269540840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Facebook is the anti-social network, most people on there refuse to talk to people they don't know (although a lot will accept a random ad to appear more popular). <br> <br>

People might be meeting up for casual sex online more than before, but I severely doubt it's through facebook</htmltext>
<tokenext>Facebook is the anti-social network , most people on there refuse to talk to people they do n't know ( although a lot will accept a random ad to appear more popular ) .
People might be meeting up for casual sex online more than before , but I severely doubt it 's through facebook</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Facebook is the anti-social network, most people on there refuse to talk to people they don't know (although a lot will accept a random ad to appear more popular).
People might be meeting up for casual sex online more than before, but I severely doubt it's through facebook</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615502</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong places</title>
	<author>Shimbo</author>
	<datestamp>1269547440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The UK just had to cut down a bunch of trees because people were 'dogging,' or having public sex there.</p> </div><p>You shouldn't believe everything you read in the funny papers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The UK just had to cut down a bunch of trees because people were 'dogging, ' or having public sex there .
You should n't believe everything you read in the funny papers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The UK just had to cut down a bunch of trees because people were 'dogging,' or having public sex there.
You shouldn't believe everything you read in the funny papers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615100</id>
	<title>Re:C!=C</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1269546060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So you're saying that perhaps there are more Facebook members because everyone has STDs now?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So you 're saying that perhaps there are more Facebook members because everyone has STDs now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you're saying that perhaps there are more Facebook members because everyone has STDs now?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614292</id>
	<title>Re:Damn</title>
	<author>jwietelmann</author>
	<datestamp>1269543420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Am I the only one who immediately thought of "<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rNgCnY1lPg" title="youtube.com">Friendface</a> [youtube.com]"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one who immediately thought of " Friendface [ youtube.com ] " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one who immediately thought of "Friendface [youtube.com]"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615272</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong places</title>
	<author>SheeEttin</author>
	<datestamp>1269546720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The UK just had to cut down a bunch of trees because people were 'dogging,' or having public sex there. [...]can you teach us American how to be a little less puritanical?</p></div></blockquote><p>Clearly, you are not familiar with the Fens in Boston, where they cut down quite a bit of vegetation (reeds, I think) because they were being used by gay men for hookups.<br>
There was actually quite a bit of outcry, but nothing really happened. You can find out more about it by Googling.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The UK just had to cut down a bunch of trees because people were 'dogging, ' or having public sex there .
[ ... ] can you teach us American how to be a little less puritanical ? Clearly , you are not familiar with the Fens in Boston , where they cut down quite a bit of vegetation ( reeds , I think ) because they were being used by gay men for hookups .
There was actually quite a bit of outcry , but nothing really happened .
You can find out more about it by Googling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The UK just had to cut down a bunch of trees because people were 'dogging,' or having public sex there.
[...]can you teach us American how to be a little less puritanical?Clearly, you are not familiar with the Fens in Boston, where they cut down quite a bit of vegetation (reeds, I think) because they were being used by gay men for hookups.
There was actually quite a bit of outcry, but nothing really happened.
You can find out more about it by Googling.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613482</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong places</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269541140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You haven't friended your mom, have you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have n't friended your mom , have you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You haven't friended your mom, have you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612420</id>
	<title>There's an app for that?</title>
	<author>CodingHero</author>
	<datestamp>1269537720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll bet there is, or will soon be, an app for just such a purpose, "friend" suggestions and all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll bet there is , or will soon be , an app for just such a purpose , " friend " suggestions and all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll bet there is, or will soon be, an app for just such a purpose, "friend" suggestions and all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613922</id>
	<title>Re:Murder!</title>
	<author>WonkoS</author>
	<datestamp>1269542340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh sure, and 99\% of people who died of cancer wore underwear.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh sure , and 99 \ % of people who died of cancer wore underwear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh sure, and 99\% of people who died of cancer wore underwear.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31616420</id>
	<title>Re:C!=C</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269550560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Burden of proof is on you. Correlation is interesting, but the causation could run in either direction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Burden of proof is on you .
Correlation is interesting , but the causation could run in either direction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Burden of proof is on you.
Correlation is interesting, but the causation could run in either direction.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613314</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269540660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the way the contact is made DOES matter.</p><p>See, you need to put Mr. Johnson into Ms. Puuter for it to be called "sex." There are usually 3 different hole choices for Ms. Puuter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the way the contact is made DOES matter.See , you need to put Mr. Johnson into Ms. Puuter for it to be called " sex .
" There are usually 3 different hole choices for Ms. Puuter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the way the contact is made DOES matter.See, you need to put Mr. Johnson into Ms. Puuter for it to be called "sex.
" There are usually 3 different hole choices for Ms. Puuter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612336</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612406</id>
	<title>Murder!</title>
	<author>DIplomatic</author>
	<datestamp>1269537720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmmm... that's a pretty good shock-headline-mostly-unrelated-to-the-facts, but I bet I can do better.
</p><p>
"Levi Jeans are Murdering Texans"</p><p>In a whopping 80\% of deaths in the state of Texas, the deceased was wearing denim jeans - says a study conducted by the University of Jumping-to-Silly-Conclusions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmmm... that 's a pretty good shock-headline-mostly-unrelated-to-the-facts , but I bet I can do better .
" Levi Jeans are Murdering Texans " In a whopping 80 \ % of deaths in the state of Texas , the deceased was wearing denim jeans - says a study conducted by the University of Jumping-to-Silly-Conclusions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmmm... that's a pretty good shock-headline-mostly-unrelated-to-the-facts, but I bet I can do better.
"Levi Jeans are Murdering Texans"In a whopping 80\% of deaths in the state of Texas, the deceased was wearing denim jeans - says a study conducted by the University of Jumping-to-Silly-Conclusions.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612434</id>
	<title>Public awareness campaign</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269537780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So someone says social networking sites are to blame, instead of the amazing coincidence that syphilis cases increased as the government stopped their public awareness campaigns against STDs. I'm thinking someone needs to expand their search for causalitis.</p><p>"These are your genitals.  THESE are your genitals on Syphilis. Any questions?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So someone says social networking sites are to blame , instead of the amazing coincidence that syphilis cases increased as the government stopped their public awareness campaigns against STDs .
I 'm thinking someone needs to expand their search for causalitis .
" These are your genitals .
THESE are your genitals on Syphilis .
Any questions ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So someone says social networking sites are to blame, instead of the amazing coincidence that syphilis cases increased as the government stopped their public awareness campaigns against STDs.
I'm thinking someone needs to expand their search for causalitis.
"These are your genitals.
THESE are your genitals on Syphilis.
Any questions?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615676</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269548040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Doesn't really matter how the contact is made, does it?</p></div><p>It does matter as to how contact is made. RTFA, and don't make contact without a condom.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't really matter how the contact is made , does it ? It does matter as to how contact is made .
RTFA , and do n't make contact without a condom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't really matter how the contact is made, does it?It does matter as to how contact is made.
RTFA, and don't make contact without a condom.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612336</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613118</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>Andy\_w715</author>
	<datestamp>1269540000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...I wouldn't say this is a problem with Facebook so much as a problem with fucking <b>stupidly</b>,.  It's not my place to question someone's sexual activity, but come on...who has sex with a stranger without using a condom?</p></div><p>
FYP.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...I would n't say this is a problem with Facebook so much as a problem with fucking stupidly, .
It 's not my place to question someone 's sexual activity , but come on...who has sex with a stranger without using a condom ?
FYP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I wouldn't say this is a problem with Facebook so much as a problem with fucking stupidly,.
It's not my place to question someone's sexual activity, but come on...who has sex with a stranger without using a condom?
FYP.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613062</id>
	<title>Thats right</title>
	<author>C\_Kode</author>
	<datestamp>1269539760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thats right.  YOU have syphilis Facebooker!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thats right .
YOU have syphilis Facebooker !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thats right.
YOU have syphilis Facebooker!
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31650112</id>
	<title>I've seen this shit before</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269769560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And there are like 30,000 (aleck) members in my area: <a href="http://www.gofuckbook.com/" title="gofuckbook.com" rel="nofollow">fuckbook</a> [gofuckbook.com]. Right, sometimes I think I'm the only one with computer in town<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:))))))))))</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And there are like 30,000 ( aleck ) members in my area : fuckbook [ gofuckbook.com ] .
Right , sometimes I think I 'm the only one with computer in town : ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And there are like 30,000 (aleck) members in my area: fuckbook [gofuckbook.com].
Right, sometimes I think I'm the only one with computer in town :))))))))))</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31625132</id>
	<title>Re:..as reported by Murdoch's newspapers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269613800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you knew anything about human nature, you'd know a story like this would drive <b>up</b> usage of facebook. Sort of like if toysrus banned a video game. All the teenagers would say "wow, there must be something really nasty in there! I'm going to find it!!!" Or are you thinking Murdoch was hoping to crash their servers with a whole bunch of new traffic?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you knew anything about human nature , you 'd know a story like this would drive up usage of facebook .
Sort of like if toysrus banned a video game .
All the teenagers would say " wow , there must be something really nasty in there !
I 'm going to find it ! ! !
" Or are you thinking Murdoch was hoping to crash their servers with a whole bunch of new traffic ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you knew anything about human nature, you'd know a story like this would drive up usage of facebook.
Sort of like if toysrus banned a video game.
All the teenagers would say "wow, there must be something really nasty in there!
I'm going to find it!!!
" Or are you thinking Murdoch was hoping to crash their servers with a whole bunch of new traffic?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612340</id>
	<title>Facebook??</title>
	<author>esobofh</author>
	<datestamp>1269537540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ahh facebook? I think craigslist takes the blame here...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahh facebook ?
I think craigslist takes the blame here.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahh facebook?
I think craigslist takes the blame here...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612386</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong places</title>
	<author>MikeFM</author>
	<datestamp>1269537660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>My wife is on my buddy list. Does that count? And no STDs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My wife is on my buddy list .
Does that count ?
And no STDs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My wife is on my buddy list.
Does that count?
And no STDs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613656</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269541680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's already a rebuttal here: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2010/mar/25/sun-dailytelegraph" title="guardian.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2010/mar/25/sun-dailytelegraph</a> [guardian.co.uk].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's already a rebuttal here : http : //www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2010/mar/25/sun-dailytelegraph [ guardian.co.uk ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's already a rebuttal here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2010/mar/25/sun-dailytelegraph [guardian.co.uk].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612336</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31617544</id>
	<title>Re:Damn</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269511080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe in the expanded edition.  Mine only says "Mostly Harmless."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe in the expanded edition .
Mine only says " Mostly Harmless .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe in the expanded edition.
Mine only says "Mostly Harmless.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612952</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>cbope</author>
	<datestamp>1269539400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone who is fucking stupidly?</p><p>Thanks, I'll be here all evening, try the salmon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone who is fucking stupidly ? Thanks , I 'll be here all evening , try the salmon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone who is fucking stupidly?Thanks, I'll be here all evening, try the salmon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31623374</id>
	<title>Re:C!=C</title>
	<author>ignavus</author>
	<datestamp>1269599220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Correlation is not causation.  Facebook usage may correlate, but doesn't cause it.</p><p>"Don't drink and park.  Accidents make people."</p></div><p>Of course Facebook usage doesn't cause it.</p><p>It is when they <em>stop</em> using Facebook (and the whole computer) that causes it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Correlation is not causation .
Facebook usage may correlate , but does n't cause it .
" Do n't drink and park .
Accidents make people .
" Of course Facebook usage does n't cause it.It is when they stop using Facebook ( and the whole computer ) that causes it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correlation is not causation.
Facebook usage may correlate, but doesn't cause it.
"Don't drink and park.
Accidents make people.
"Of course Facebook usage doesn't cause it.It is when they stop using Facebook (and the whole computer) that causes it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612778</id>
	<title>If Facebook give you an STD....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269538920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You are doing it wrong......



Slashdot good.
Long live FARK</htmltext>
<tokenext>You are doing it wrong..... . Slashdot good .
Long live FARK</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are doing it wrong......



Slashdot good.
Long live FARK</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612288</id>
	<title>You heard it here first, folks:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269537360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You heard it here first, folks: Facebook users cannot figure out how to use condoms!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You heard it here first , folks : Facebook users can not figure out how to use condoms !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You heard it here first, folks: Facebook users cannot figure out how to use condoms!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31617824</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong places</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269512400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's because we have large numbers of drunken sluts who will fuck just about anything.</p></div><p>And a good thing too or the whole island would be depopulated in a generation!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's because we have large numbers of drunken sluts who will fuck just about anything.And a good thing too or the whole island would be depopulated in a generation !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's because we have large numbers of drunken sluts who will fuck just about anything.And a good thing too or the whole island would be depopulated in a generation!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612442</id>
	<title>Practice safe hex</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269537780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't do cyber-sex without a cyber-condom.</p><p>Mixing cyber-sex with real-world sex requires additional special precautions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't do cyber-sex without a cyber-condom.Mixing cyber-sex with real-world sex requires additional special precautions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't do cyber-sex without a cyber-condom.Mixing cyber-sex with real-world sex requires additional special precautions.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615786</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1269548400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, I dunno, perhaps <em>only about every life-form on this whole planet</em>, before the invention on condoms!! ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , I dunno , perhaps only about every life-form on this whole planet , before the invention on condoms ! !
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, I dunno, perhaps only about every life-form on this whole planet, before the invention on condoms!!
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612754</id>
	<title>Re:C!=C</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269538860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Correlation is not causation.  <b>Facebook usage may correlate, but doesn't cause it.</b> </p><p>"Don't drink and park.  Accidents make people."</p></div><p>I'd love to see your data disproving causation in this scenario. Or are you just making a blind guess?</p><p>Just because "facebook usage may coorelate" you cannot take the logical leap and say that it "doesn't cause it"</p><p>Correlation is often a good grounds for doing a study to determine causation/non-causation.</p><p>People who don't understand what "correlation != causation" is supposed to convey should avoid using it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Correlation is not causation .
Facebook usage may correlate , but does n't cause it .
" Do n't drink and park .
Accidents make people .
" I 'd love to see your data disproving causation in this scenario .
Or are you just making a blind guess ? Just because " facebook usage may coorelate " you can not take the logical leap and say that it " does n't cause it " Correlation is often a good grounds for doing a study to determine causation/non-causation.People who do n't understand what " correlation ! = causation " is supposed to convey should avoid using it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correlation is not causation.
Facebook usage may correlate, but doesn't cause it.
"Don't drink and park.
Accidents make people.
"I'd love to see your data disproving causation in this scenario.
Or are you just making a blind guess?Just because "facebook usage may coorelate" you cannot take the logical leap and say that it "doesn't cause it"Correlation is often a good grounds for doing a study to determine causation/non-causation.People who don't understand what "correlation != causation" is supposed to convey should avoid using it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240</id>
	<title>Wrong places</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269537240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; I've obviously been looking at the wrong places on Facebook.  Where's the "casual sex hookup" area?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>    I 've obviously been looking at the wrong places on Facebook .
Where 's the " casual sex hookup " area ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
    I've obviously been looking at the wrong places on Facebook.
Where's the "casual sex hookup" area?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31637178</id>
	<title>After seeing a recent...</title>
	<author>cmdrwhitewolf</author>
	<datestamp>1269628620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Two MANswers shows basically dissing British girls, I'm wondering "What's with all the axe grinding going on here? Did someone in the media circles get his nads caught in the celebrity bad rumor button masher with a British gal?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Two MANswers shows basically dissing British girls , I 'm wondering " What 's with all the axe grinding going on here ?
Did someone in the media circles get his nads caught in the celebrity bad rumor button masher with a British gal ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two MANswers shows basically dissing British girls, I'm wondering "What's with all the axe grinding going on here?
Did someone in the media circles get his nads caught in the celebrity bad rumor button masher with a British gal?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613210</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269540300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People with STDs apparently.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People with STDs apparently .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People with STDs apparently.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612432</id>
	<title>Re:Damn</title>
	<author>WrongSizeGlass</author>
	<datestamp>1269537780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>One place this <b>isn't</b> happening is Shatner's <a href="http://www.myouterspace.com/" title="myouterspace.com">myouterspace.com</a> [myouterspace.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>One place this is n't happening is Shatner 's myouterspace.com [ myouterspace.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One place this isn't happening is Shatner's myouterspace.com [myouterspace.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613116</id>
	<title>Re:False report</title>
	<author>Spad</author>
	<datestamp>1269540000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The Sun links this to a survey last month suggesting that the region is Britain's Facebook capital - "figures released last month showed that people in Sunderland, Durham and Teesside were 25\% more likely to log on regularly."</p><p>But Mr Kunonga points out that Sunderland and Durham are not in the NHS Tees area - so the syphilis statistics do not apply to those apparently Facebook-mad cities.</p></div><p>Keep up the good work guys!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Sun links this to a survey last month suggesting that the region is Britain 's Facebook capital - " figures released last month showed that people in Sunderland , Durham and Teesside were 25 \ % more likely to log on regularly .
" But Mr Kunonga points out that Sunderland and Durham are not in the NHS Tees area - so the syphilis statistics do not apply to those apparently Facebook-mad cities.Keep up the good work guys !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Sun links this to a survey last month suggesting that the region is Britain's Facebook capital - "figures released last month showed that people in Sunderland, Durham and Teesside were 25\% more likely to log on regularly.
"But Mr Kunonga points out that Sunderland and Durham are not in the NHS Tees area - so the syphilis statistics do not apply to those apparently Facebook-mad cities.Keep up the good work guys!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31622122</id>
	<title>Re:C!=C</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269539460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Onus isn't on him to disprove causation. Onus is on Professor Peter Kelly to prove causation. Right now, all he has is a theory. He may as well be saying "We have the Bible, so God must be real."</p><p>(Disclaimer: This is not an argument regarding the validity of religion, nor does this make any claims about the validity or invalidity of religion. It's only pointing out bad arguments. If Professor Peter Kelly doesn't take the task of proving his theory, he may as well be starting his own religion.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Onus is n't on him to disprove causation .
Onus is on Professor Peter Kelly to prove causation .
Right now , all he has is a theory .
He may as well be saying " We have the Bible , so God must be real .
" ( Disclaimer : This is not an argument regarding the validity of religion , nor does this make any claims about the validity or invalidity of religion .
It 's only pointing out bad arguments .
If Professor Peter Kelly does n't take the task of proving his theory , he may as well be starting his own religion .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Onus isn't on him to disprove causation.
Onus is on Professor Peter Kelly to prove causation.
Right now, all he has is a theory.
He may as well be saying "We have the Bible, so God must be real.
"(Disclaimer: This is not an argument regarding the validity of religion, nor does this make any claims about the validity or invalidity of religion.
It's only pointing out bad arguments.
If Professor Peter Kelly doesn't take the task of proving his theory, he may as well be starting his own religion.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614750</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong places</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269544980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your wife's on my buddy list too. You might want to get yourself checked...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your wife 's on my buddy list too .
You might want to get yourself checked.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your wife's on my buddy list too.
You might want to get yourself checked...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613506</id>
	<title>Everybody's Doin' It</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269541200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Doesn't everyone have unprotected sex with strangers while surfing Facebook? Why is this news?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't everyone have unprotected sex with strangers while surfing Facebook ?
Why is this news ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't everyone have unprotected sex with strangers while surfing Facebook?
Why is this news?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613340</id>
	<title>F*&amp;(ing FARMVILLE!</title>
	<author>forgot\_my\_username</author>
	<datestamp>1269540720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>Great, </b> <br>
I blame farmville, all that trading about of farm animals.<br>
<br>
It used to be that a man's sheep where a man's sheep... and you did not touch another man's sheep.<br>
<br>
But, there you go... all this willy nilly trading of farm animals was bound to have a bad end!<br>
<br>
<br>
Spurious link:<a href="http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/5471722-cancer-zapped-with-nanoparticles-in-humans" title="allvoices.com" rel="nofollow">siRNA and protein synthesis video with stupid article I wrote attached</a> [allvoices.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Great , I blame farmville , all that trading about of farm animals .
It used to be that a man 's sheep where a man 's sheep... and you did not touch another man 's sheep .
But , there you go... all this willy nilly trading of farm animals was bound to have a bad end !
Spurious link : siRNA and protein synthesis video with stupid article I wrote attached [ allvoices.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great,  
I blame farmville, all that trading about of farm animals.
It used to be that a man's sheep where a man's sheep... and you did not touch another man's sheep.
But, there you go... all this willy nilly trading of farm animals was bound to have a bad end!
Spurious link:siRNA and protein synthesis video with stupid article I wrote attached [allvoices.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612674</id>
	<title>Wrong. FB leads to increased casual sex.</title>
	<author>Kenja</author>
	<datestamp>1269538620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its all the stupid people having sex that leads to the STDs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its all the stupid people having sex that leads to the STDs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its all the stupid people having sex that leads to the STDs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614278</id>
	<title>Re:Murder!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269543360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was going to buy stock in Levi Strauss according to this hot tip, but they're a privately held company.</p><p>Can you tell me any other companies which are helping to kill Texans?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was going to buy stock in Levi Strauss according to this hot tip , but they 're a privately held company.Can you tell me any other companies which are helping to kill Texans ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was going to buy stock in Levi Strauss according to this hot tip, but they're a privately held company.Can you tell me any other companies which are helping to kill Texans?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612370</id>
	<title>same old</title>
	<author>Tobor the Eighth Man</author>
	<datestamp>1269537600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, look, an interesting statistical effect. How to explain it? Rigorous analysis? Nah, let's just blame it on new technology, 'cuz that wasn't around before and now things are different - obviously, there's a meaningful correlation!</p><p>Reminds me of the piracy/global warming graph: http://www.samizdata.net/blog/~pdeh/piratesarecool4.gif</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , look , an interesting statistical effect .
How to explain it ?
Rigorous analysis ?
Nah , let 's just blame it on new technology , 'cuz that was n't around before and now things are different - obviously , there 's a meaningful correlation ! Reminds me of the piracy/global warming graph : http : //www.samizdata.net/blog/ ~ pdeh/piratesarecool4.gif</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, look, an interesting statistical effect.
How to explain it?
Rigorous analysis?
Nah, let's just blame it on new technology, 'cuz that wasn't around before and now things are different - obviously, there's a meaningful correlation!Reminds me of the piracy/global warming graph: http://www.samizdata.net/blog/~pdeh/piratesarecool4.gif</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612316</id>
	<title>Really?</title>
	<author>Gomer79</author>
	<datestamp>1269537480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because people could not find partners through any other means besides facebook?  Maybe we should take a little bit deeper look into the numbers and see if there as actual causation vs. just correlation?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because people could not find partners through any other means besides facebook ?
Maybe we should take a little bit deeper look into the numbers and see if there as actual causation vs. just correlation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because people could not find partners through any other means besides facebook?
Maybe we should take a little bit deeper look into the numbers and see if there as actual causation vs. just correlation?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612524</id>
	<title>Damn</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1269538140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I knew there was something on Facebook I was missing out on aside from Mafia Wars.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I knew there was something on Facebook I was missing out on aside from Mafia Wars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I knew there was something on Facebook I was missing out on aside from Mafia Wars.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613678</id>
	<title>Re:C!=C</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1269541680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"but doesn't cause it"</p><p>Your error is at least as great as someone who says Facebook usage definitely causes STD increase.  Correlation != causation is misleading at best.  The proper statement is correlation !==&gt; causation: correlation does not imply causation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" but does n't cause it " Your error is at least as great as someone who says Facebook usage definitely causes STD increase .
Correlation ! = causation is misleading at best .
The proper statement is correlation ! = = &gt; causation : correlation does not imply causation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"but doesn't cause it"Your error is at least as great as someone who says Facebook usage definitely causes STD increase.
Correlation != causation is misleading at best.
The proper statement is correlation !==&gt; causation: correlation does not imply causation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615732</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong places</title>
	<author>xaxa</author>
	<datestamp>1269548160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>The UK just had to cut down a bunch of trees because people were 'dogging,' or having public sex there.</p></div><p>You shouldn't believe everything you read in the funny papers.</p></div><p>It seems it <a href="http://www.thisislancashire.co.uk/news/5074429.6\_000\_trees\_felled\_on\_outskirts\_of\_Darwen/" title="thisislancashire.co.uk">really happened</a> [thisislancashire.co.uk], except they felled the trees because they were old and a "safety risk" and are planting new ones.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The UK just had to cut down a bunch of trees because people were 'dogging, ' or having public sex there.You should n't believe everything you read in the funny papers.It seems it really happened [ thisislancashire.co.uk ] , except they felled the trees because they were old and a " safety risk " and are planting new ones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The UK just had to cut down a bunch of trees because people were 'dogging,' or having public sex there.You shouldn't believe everything you read in the funny papers.It seems it really happened [thisislancashire.co.uk], except they felled the trees because they were old and a "safety risk" and are planting new ones.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614208</id>
	<title>Right...and video games create mass murderers</title>
	<author>grapeape</author>
	<datestamp>1269543120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can we please have a sanity check.  Sure social networking has become a convenient way to meet people for random encounters, but classified ads and drunken bar visits have provided that for generations.  I wonder if they bothered to consider that perhaps Facebook and its ilk aren't actually increasing the amount of infections but instead increasing peoples awareness and as a result more people getting tested.  In previous times if someone gave someone else an STD the victim's only way of exposing the person passing it was to talk to mutual friends...with social networks there is easy access to friends of  friends and acquaintance so spreading the word is now as easy as it was to spread the virus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we please have a sanity check .
Sure social networking has become a convenient way to meet people for random encounters , but classified ads and drunken bar visits have provided that for generations .
I wonder if they bothered to consider that perhaps Facebook and its ilk are n't actually increasing the amount of infections but instead increasing peoples awareness and as a result more people getting tested .
In previous times if someone gave someone else an STD the victim 's only way of exposing the person passing it was to talk to mutual friends...with social networks there is easy access to friends of friends and acquaintance so spreading the word is now as easy as it was to spread the virus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we please have a sanity check.
Sure social networking has become a convenient way to meet people for random encounters, but classified ads and drunken bar visits have provided that for generations.
I wonder if they bothered to consider that perhaps Facebook and its ilk aren't actually increasing the amount of infections but instead increasing peoples awareness and as a result more people getting tested.
In previous times if someone gave someone else an STD the victim's only way of exposing the person passing it was to talk to mutual friends...with social networks there is easy access to friends of  friends and acquaintance so spreading the word is now as easy as it was to spread the virus.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613330</id>
	<title>Re:..as reported by Murdoch's newspapers</title>
	<author>dunezone</author>
	<datestamp>1269540660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Myspace is the ghost town of the internet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Myspace is the ghost town of the internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Myspace is the ghost town of the internet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613056</id>
	<title>The media report is wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269539760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a case were media make connections not claimed in the original report, in order to make it more newsworthy. The BBC quotes Prof. Kelly, stating:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>"Our press release was simply trying to highlight the risks of casual sex. We did not make the claim that social networking sites are causing the rise in the incidence of syphilis."</p></div><p>http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/rorycellanjones/2010/03/technophobia\_facebook\_and\_syph.html</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a case were media make connections not claimed in the original report , in order to make it more newsworthy .
The BBC quotes Prof. Kelly , stating : " Our press release was simply trying to highlight the risks of casual sex .
We did not make the claim that social networking sites are causing the rise in the incidence of syphilis .
" http : //www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/rorycellanjones/2010/03/technophobia \ _facebook \ _and \ _syph.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a case were media make connections not claimed in the original report, in order to make it more newsworthy.
The BBC quotes Prof. Kelly, stating:"Our press release was simply trying to highlight the risks of casual sex.
We did not make the claim that social networking sites are causing the rise in the incidence of syphilis.
"http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/rorycellanjones/2010/03/technophobia\_facebook\_and\_syph.html
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612612</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong places</title>
	<author>joss</author>
	<datestamp>1269538440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There was a nice article in the spectator as to how you people from continental europe list the UK as a favorite destination. This is despite of the food, weather, shitty attitude. It's because we have large numbers of drunken sluts who will fuck just about anything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There was a nice article in the spectator as to how you people from continental europe list the UK as a favorite destination .
This is despite of the food , weather , shitty attitude .
It 's because we have large numbers of drunken sluts who will fuck just about anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was a nice article in the spectator as to how you people from continental europe list the UK as a favorite destination.
This is despite of the food, weather, shitty attitude.
It's because we have large numbers of drunken sluts who will fuck just about anything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612418</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong places</title>
	<author>spun</author>
	<datestamp>1269537720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't live in the UK, do you? Obviously, something has happened to the stuffy Brits. The UK just had to cut down a bunch of trees because people were 'dogging,' or having public sex there. There is evidently an epidemic of sexy times in the North Atlantic Archipelago. When did 'stiff upper lip' turn into 'stiff willy saluting passing motorists?' and more importantly, can you teach us American how to be a little less puritanical?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't live in the UK , do you ?
Obviously , something has happened to the stuffy Brits .
The UK just had to cut down a bunch of trees because people were 'dogging, ' or having public sex there .
There is evidently an epidemic of sexy times in the North Atlantic Archipelago .
When did 'stiff upper lip ' turn into 'stiff willy saluting passing motorists ?
' and more importantly , can you teach us American how to be a little less puritanical ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't live in the UK, do you?
Obviously, something has happened to the stuffy Brits.
The UK just had to cut down a bunch of trees because people were 'dogging,' or having public sex there.
There is evidently an epidemic of sexy times in the North Atlantic Archipelago.
When did 'stiff upper lip' turn into 'stiff willy saluting passing motorists?
' and more importantly, can you teach us American how to be a little less puritanical?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614384</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong places</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269543720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So... I should connect to your wife for casual sex?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So... I should connect to your wife for casual sex ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So... I should connect to your wife for casual sex?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615610</id>
	<title>Re:..as reported by Murdoch's newspapers</title>
	<author>tool462</author>
	<datestamp>1269547740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Especially since just creating a MySpace account gives you the clap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Especially since just creating a MySpace account gives you the clap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Especially since just creating a MySpace account gives you the clap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613620</id>
	<title>Re:Murder!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269541560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Hmmm... that's a pretty good shock-headline-mostly-unrelated-to-the-facts, but I bet I can do better.</p><p>"Levi Jeans are Murdering Texans"</p><p>In a whopping 80\% of deaths in the state of Texas, the deceased was wearing denim jeans - says a study conducted by the University of Jumping-to-Silly-Conclusions.</p></div><p>This is very funny! Thank you! You gave me the best laugh of the day.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmmm... that 's a pretty good shock-headline-mostly-unrelated-to-the-facts , but I bet I can do better .
" Levi Jeans are Murdering Texans " In a whopping 80 \ % of deaths in the state of Texas , the deceased was wearing denim jeans - says a study conducted by the University of Jumping-to-Silly-Conclusions.This is very funny !
Thank you !
You gave me the best laugh of the day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmmm... that's a pretty good shock-headline-mostly-unrelated-to-the-facts, but I bet I can do better.
"Levi Jeans are Murdering Texans"In a whopping 80\% of deaths in the state of Texas, the deceased was wearing denim jeans - says a study conducted by the University of Jumping-to-Silly-Conclusions.This is very funny!
Thank you!
You gave me the best laugh of the day.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31618202</id>
	<title>It's 2010</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269514020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Alex Fleming discovered Penecillin's over eighty years ago.

HOW THE FSCK does anyone still get syphilis?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Alex Fleming discovered Penecillin 's over eighty years ago .
HOW THE FSCK does anyone still get syphilis ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Alex Fleming discovered Penecillin's over eighty years ago.
HOW THE FSCK does anyone still get syphilis?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612430</id>
	<title>False report</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269537780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The german media watchblog BILDblog just <a href="http://www.bildblog.de/17468/facebook-syphilis-ist-bloss-journalisten-kraetze/" title="bildblog.de" rel="nofollow">reported</a> [bildblog.de] (in german) this to be a hoax. The connection between Facebook and STDs was constructed by The Sun, not by Prof. Kelly.</p><p>The Department of Public Health even issued a counterstatement <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/rorycellanjones/2010/03/technophobia\_facebook\_and\_syph.html" title="bbc.co.uk" rel="nofollow">according to the BBC</a> [bbc.co.uk].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The german media watchblog BILDblog just reported [ bildblog.de ] ( in german ) this to be a hoax .
The connection between Facebook and STDs was constructed by The Sun , not by Prof. Kelly.The Department of Public Health even issued a counterstatement according to the BBC [ bbc.co.uk ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The german media watchblog BILDblog just reported [bildblog.de] (in german) this to be a hoax.
The connection between Facebook and STDs was constructed by The Sun, not by Prof. Kelly.The Department of Public Health even issued a counterstatement according to the BBC [bbc.co.uk].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31616594</id>
	<title>Re:C!=C</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269507900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The data has to prove it causes it before one can say it causes it. No data available does not prove causation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The data has to prove it causes it before one can say it causes it .
No data available does not prove causation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The data has to prove it causes it before one can say it causes it.
No data available does not prove causation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613386</id>
	<title>Just curious</title>
	<author>AskFirefly</author>
	<datestamp>1269540840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is any of this happening in Farmville????</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is any of this happening in Farmville ? ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is any of this happening in Farmville???
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31617620</id>
	<title>WRONG HEADLINE!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269511440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The headline should read <b>"Brit singles had no sex before computers - facebook brings 4 times increase!"</b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The headline should read " Brit singles had no sex before computers - facebook brings 4 times increase !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The headline should read "Brit singles had no sex before computers - facebook brings 4 times increase!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612532</id>
	<title>Re:Um...</title>
	<author>phantomfive</author>
	<datestamp>1269538140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, seriously.  We already have the cure for syphilis and AIDS, all we have to do is use it.  If everyone used condoms, both diseases would be wiped out in a generation, less for syphilis.  Much like vaccinations, some idiots who don't get them cause problems for the rest of us.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , seriously .
We already have the cure for syphilis and AIDS , all we have to do is use it .
If everyone used condoms , both diseases would be wiped out in a generation , less for syphilis .
Much like vaccinations , some idiots who do n't get them cause problems for the rest of us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, seriously.
We already have the cure for syphilis and AIDS, all we have to do is use it.
If everyone used condoms, both diseases would be wiped out in a generation, less for syphilis.
Much like vaccinations, some idiots who don't get them cause problems for the rest of us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612878</id>
	<title>Re:False report</title>
	<author>Orange Crush</author>
	<datestamp>1269539160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hogwash, next you'll tell me that global warming isn't really caused by the <a href="http://www.venganza.org/about/open-letter/" title="venganza.org">decline in pirates since the 1800s.</a> [venganza.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hogwash , next you 'll tell me that global warming is n't really caused by the decline in pirates since the 1800s .
[ venganza.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hogwash, next you'll tell me that global warming isn't really caused by the decline in pirates since the 1800s.
[venganza.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31624178</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong places</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1269607560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's okay, most Brits think German women are big butch hairy armpitted monsters named Gertrude.</p><p>I guess stereotypes work both ways, but they're rarely accurate.</p><p>That said, in some parts of Yorkshire where I currently live I'd be inclined to agree, although it's certainly not true for most of the rest of the country<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's okay , most Brits think German women are big butch hairy armpitted monsters named Gertrude.I guess stereotypes work both ways , but they 're rarely accurate.That said , in some parts of Yorkshire where I currently live I 'd be inclined to agree , although it 's certainly not true for most of the rest of the country ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's okay, most Brits think German women are big butch hairy armpitted monsters named Gertrude.I guess stereotypes work both ways, but they're rarely accurate.That said, in some parts of Yorkshire where I currently live I'd be inclined to agree, although it's certainly not true for most of the rest of the country ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613298</id>
	<title>Re:C!=C</title>
	<author>dcollins</author>
	<datestamp>1269540600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dvorkin said it best: "The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using 'correlation is not causation' as an argument is close to 1."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dvorkin said it best : " The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using 'correlation is not causation ' as an argument is close to 1 .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dvorkin said it best: "The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using 'correlation is not causation' as an argument is close to 1.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612314</id>
	<title>i call</title>
	<author>JackSpratts</author>
	<datestamp>1269537480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>shenanigans</htmltext>
<tokenext>shenanigans</tokentext>
<sentencetext>shenanigans</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31616052</id>
	<title>Prof. Wild Claim</title>
	<author>nfc\_Death</author>
	<datestamp>1269549420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So this guys proof is
"I don't get the names of people affected, just figures, and I saw the several of the people had met sexual partners through these sites," he said
Which means that facebook is the cause of an increase in syphilis?

Or maybe its this statement he made
"Social networking sites are making it easier for people to meet up for casual sex," Prof. Peter Kelly, director of pubic health in Teesside, told the paper. "There has been a fourfold increase in the number of syphilis cases detected, with more young women being affected."

Hmmm seems to me hes just made a bunch of inflammatory statements about something he has no data, proof, or clarity about.
So the story is, Public Health officer makes wild claims about facebook use and casual sex, when he should have just made a statement about using condoms.

Why is this being considered as news? Why wasnt this story vetted properly?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So this guys proof is " I do n't get the names of people affected , just figures , and I saw the several of the people had met sexual partners through these sites , " he said Which means that facebook is the cause of an increase in syphilis ?
Or maybe its this statement he made " Social networking sites are making it easier for people to meet up for casual sex , " Prof. Peter Kelly , director of pubic health in Teesside , told the paper .
" There has been a fourfold increase in the number of syphilis cases detected , with more young women being affected .
" Hmmm seems to me hes just made a bunch of inflammatory statements about something he has no data , proof , or clarity about .
So the story is , Public Health officer makes wild claims about facebook use and casual sex , when he should have just made a statement about using condoms .
Why is this being considered as news ?
Why wasnt this story vetted properly ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So this guys proof is
"I don't get the names of people affected, just figures, and I saw the several of the people had met sexual partners through these sites," he said
Which means that facebook is the cause of an increase in syphilis?
Or maybe its this statement he made
"Social networking sites are making it easier for people to meet up for casual sex," Prof. Peter Kelly, director of pubic health in Teesside, told the paper.
"There has been a fourfold increase in the number of syphilis cases detected, with more young women being affected.
"

Hmmm seems to me hes just made a bunch of inflammatory statements about something he has no data, proof, or clarity about.
So the story is, Public Health officer makes wild claims about facebook use and casual sex, when he should have just made a statement about using condoms.
Why is this being considered as news?
Why wasnt this story vetted properly?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612522</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong places</title>
	<author>DriedClexler</author>
	<datestamp>1269538140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The gay networks.</p><p>Yeah, sorry, not what you were hoping for, I guess.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The gay networks.Yeah , sorry , not what you were hoping for , I guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The gay networks.Yeah, sorry, not what you were hoping for, I guess.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31616828</id>
	<title>Re:False report</title>
	<author>blitzkrieg3</author>
	<datestamp>1269508800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For anyone who wants to know the actual numbers<blockquote><div><p>Apparently, in 2008 in the NHS Tees area (Middlesbrough, Stockton-on-Tees, Redcar and Cleveland) there were fewer than 10 cases of syphilis - so few that, under data-protection rules, the NHS can't give out the exact number.
<br>
But in 2009, 30 cases of heterosexual syphilis were notified to the NHS. So, yes: a four-fold increase, but a very small sample from which to drawn any very big conclusions.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Long story short, they noticed an increase, asked the patient where they got the disease. The patient said they met partners on the internet, which gets translated into Facebook. I'd put my money on it being Craigslist, as someone mentioned earlier.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For anyone who wants to know the actual numbersApparently , in 2008 in the NHS Tees area ( Middlesbrough , Stockton-on-Tees , Redcar and Cleveland ) there were fewer than 10 cases of syphilis - so few that , under data-protection rules , the NHS ca n't give out the exact number .
But in 2009 , 30 cases of heterosexual syphilis were notified to the NHS .
So , yes : a four-fold increase , but a very small sample from which to drawn any very big conclusions .
Long story short , they noticed an increase , asked the patient where they got the disease .
The patient said they met partners on the internet , which gets translated into Facebook .
I 'd put my money on it being Craigslist , as someone mentioned earlier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For anyone who wants to know the actual numbersApparently, in 2008 in the NHS Tees area (Middlesbrough, Stockton-on-Tees, Redcar and Cleveland) there were fewer than 10 cases of syphilis - so few that, under data-protection rules, the NHS can't give out the exact number.
But in 2009, 30 cases of heterosexual syphilis were notified to the NHS.
So, yes: a four-fold increase, but a very small sample from which to drawn any very big conclusions.
Long story short, they noticed an increase, asked the patient where they got the disease.
The patient said they met partners on the internet, which gets translated into Facebook.
I'd put my money on it being Craigslist, as someone mentioned earlier.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613712</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong places</title>
	<author>jduhls</author>
	<datestamp>1269541800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...and I'm on your wife's buddy list.  If you know what I mean.  wahkah-wahkah-wahkah! I'll be here all night, folks!</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and I 'm on your wife 's buddy list .
If you know what I mean .
wahkah-wahkah-wahkah ! I 'll be here all night , folks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and I'm on your wife's buddy list.
If you know what I mean.
wahkah-wahkah-wahkah! I'll be here all night, folks!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614252</id>
	<title>User education</title>
	<author>david\_thornley</author>
	<datestamp>1269543300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
If we could only get more people to use anti-virus and firewalls....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If we could only get more people to use anti-virus and firewalls... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
If we could only get more people to use anti-virus and firewalls....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31616850</id>
	<title>An analysis from a professional in this field</title>
	<author>musicalmicah</author>
	<datestamp>1269508860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dr. Petra Boynton has a much more critical analysis of this issue on her blog <a href="http://www.drpetra.co.uk/blog/\%E2\%80\%9Cfacebook-linked-to-a-rise-in-syphilis\%E2\%80\%9D-\%E2\%80\%93-no-it\%E2\%80\%99s-not/" title="drpetra.co.uk" rel="nofollow">here</a> [drpetra.co.uk].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dr. Petra Boynton has a much more critical analysis of this issue on her blog here [ drpetra.co.uk ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dr. Petra Boynton has a much more critical analysis of this issue on her blog here [drpetra.co.uk].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613488</id>
	<title>toothing</title>
	<author>confused one</author>
	<datestamp>1269541140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This sounds too much like the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toothing" title="wikipedia.org">toothing</a> [wikipedia.org] hoax from a few years ago.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This sounds too much like the toothing [ wikipedia.org ] hoax from a few years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This sounds too much like the toothing [wikipedia.org] hoax from a few years ago.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615254</id>
	<title>Slashdot causes decrease in STDs</title>
	<author>sc0p3</author>
	<datestamp>1269546660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>In a new publication just released, reading Slashdot has been found to miraculously reduce the number of STDs in males.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In a new publication just released , reading Slashdot has been found to miraculously reduce the number of STDs in males .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a new publication just released, reading Slashdot has been found to miraculously reduce the number of STDs in males.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612400</id>
	<title>Network promiscuious mode</title>
	<author>Tei</author>
	<datestamp>1269537660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want this. How I can get that? I have already tried to recompile the network driver in promiscuos mode. But all I get is the packets of other peers on my lan<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-/,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-I ,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-),<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-O</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want this .
How I can get that ?
I have already tried to recompile the network driver in promiscuos mode .
But all I get is the packets of other peers on my lan : -/ , : -I , : - ) , : -O</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want this.
How I can get that?
I have already tried to recompile the network driver in promiscuos mode.
But all I get is the packets of other peers on my lan :-/, :-I , :-), :-O</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613930</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong places</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269542340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that is what you think........ do u watch over her 24/7....?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that is what you think........ do u watch over her 24/7.... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that is what you think........ do u watch over her 24/7....?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615948</id>
	<title>Re:..as reported by Murdoch's newspapers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269549000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because this article is about sex, not about teen bands making bad music.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because this article is about sex , not about teen bands making bad music .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because this article is about sex, not about teen bands making bad music.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31625138</id>
	<title>Re:</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1269613860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>I have to say, you are incredibly american to paint all americans with the same brush too.It's just ironic.. that's all.</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to say , you are incredibly american to paint all americans with the same brush too.It 's just ironic.. that 's all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to say, you are incredibly american to paint all americans with the same brush too.It's just ironic.. that's all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31616420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613926
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31617524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31623374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613922
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613330
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31616594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31617824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31624178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613976
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613712
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31625132
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31617202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31617544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31623710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31616828
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614554
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613270
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31622122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31620114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615676
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_25_1525208_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613370
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613976
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612282
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612714
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615126
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612352
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613664
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612532
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613028
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613486
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614258
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614646
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612400
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612314
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613926
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612280
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612418
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614966
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614554
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613594
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31623710
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615272
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612612
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615678
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31624178
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615858
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31617824
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615502
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612386
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614750
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613712
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614384
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612522
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614016
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612878
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31616828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613116
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612544
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612336
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615676
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612568
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31617544
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614292
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612674
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612778
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31623374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31617524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613270
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612754
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31616594
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31622122
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613298
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31620114
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31616420
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614018
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614250
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31617202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614444
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612480
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612442
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612316
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31618202
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613168
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31625132
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613330
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31615610
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614870
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613386
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_25_1525208.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31612406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31614278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_25_1525208.31613922
</commentlist>
</conversation>
