<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_24_1725246</id>
	<title>Photoshop CS5's Showpiece &mdash; Content-Aware Fill</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1269452580000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Barence writes <i>"If you're looking for reasons to upgrade to Photoshop CS5 when it arrives, a new demo video might just persuade you. Narrated by Bryan O'Neil-Hughes, a product manager on the Photoshop team, the <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2010/03/24/photoshop-cs5-demonstrates-its-stunning-new-party-piece/">video shows the new content-aware fill tool</a>, which has the potential to revolutionise the way you clean up photos. If you're not happy with an item in your picture, select it, delete it, and Photoshop will analyse the surrounding area and plug the gap as if it never existed."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Barence writes " If you 're looking for reasons to upgrade to Photoshop CS5 when it arrives , a new demo video might just persuade you .
Narrated by Bryan O'Neil-Hughes , a product manager on the Photoshop team , the video shows the new content-aware fill tool , which has the potential to revolutionise the way you clean up photos .
If you 're not happy with an item in your picture , select it , delete it , and Photoshop will analyse the surrounding area and plug the gap as if it never existed .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Barence writes "If you're looking for reasons to upgrade to Photoshop CS5 when it arrives, a new demo video might just persuade you.
Narrated by Bryan O'Neil-Hughes, a product manager on the Photoshop team, the video shows the new content-aware fill tool, which has the potential to revolutionise the way you clean up photos.
If you're not happy with an item in your picture, select it, delete it, and Photoshop will analyse the surrounding area and plug the gap as if it never existed.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601478</id>
	<title>Re:Having watched the whole thing to the end...</title>
	<author>neonleonb</author>
	<datestamp>1269459840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Agreed!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600676</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602456</id>
	<title>Video?</title>
	<author>paimin</author>
	<datestamp>1269463740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I want this tool in Final Cut.  It would take insanely long to process, but man oh man would it be useful.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want this tool in Final Cut .
It would take insanely long to process , but man oh man would it be useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want this tool in Final Cut.
It would take insanely long to process, but man oh man would it be useful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31617758</id>
	<title>Re:Lens Flares</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269512100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Using Photoshop to <em>remove</em> lens flares?  Oh!  Brave new world!</p><p>-Peter</p></div><p>Not Brave New World, but 1984, I think.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Using Photoshop to remove lens flares ?
Oh ! Brave new world ! -PeterNot Brave New World , but 1984 , I think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Using Photoshop to remove lens flares?
Oh!  Brave new world!-PeterNot Brave New World, but 1984, I think.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600546</id>
	<title>STOP!</title>
	<author>The Aethereal</author>
	<datestamp>1269456420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stop with the ads!  That's like the 4th one today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stop with the ads !
That 's like the 4th one today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stop with the ads!
That's like the 4th one today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601936</id>
	<title>Re:Damn.....</title>
	<author>Zarluk</author>
	<datestamp>1269461580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was about to write the same... someone mod parent up, please<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was about to write the same... someone mod parent up , please ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was about to write the same... someone mod parent up, please ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602940</id>
	<title>Something to make my life easier</title>
	<author>cyberworm</author>
	<datestamp>1269422340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As a photographer and retoucher, this looks to be something worth while. As others have mentioned earlier, there are probably some things that will need to be taken care of around edges and stuff, but still, this could save some serious time and headaches.

I think the next step for Adobe should be a "beautify" filter, and then I can stop thinking to myself "Oh god, what have I gotten myself into," when I meet some of my clients for the first time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a photographer and retoucher , this looks to be something worth while .
As others have mentioned earlier , there are probably some things that will need to be taken care of around edges and stuff , but still , this could save some serious time and headaches .
I think the next step for Adobe should be a " beautify " filter , and then I can stop thinking to myself " Oh god , what have I gotten myself into , " when I meet some of my clients for the first time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a photographer and retoucher, this looks to be something worth while.
As others have mentioned earlier, there are probably some things that will need to be taken care of around edges and stuff, but still, this could save some serious time and headaches.
I think the next step for Adobe should be a "beautify" filter, and then I can stop thinking to myself "Oh god, what have I gotten myself into," when I meet some of my clients for the first time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605160</id>
	<title>Re:One damn tool - pay for 200 unnecessary ones</title>
	<author>wal9001</author>
	<datestamp>1269432480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most of those people could get by with Photoshop Elements instead of Photoshop, and there are even cheaper alternatives if that's still too much. Honestly, I'd prefer it keep working the way it does rather than getting a $10 gutted version with in app sales or "software as a service" model feature rentals. </p><p><div class="quote"><p>Photoshop CS6 now optionally supports Content Aware Fill for $1 a use or $15 a month!!!</p></div><p>Fuck no.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of those people could get by with Photoshop Elements instead of Photoshop , and there are even cheaper alternatives if that 's still too much .
Honestly , I 'd prefer it keep working the way it does rather than getting a $ 10 gutted version with in app sales or " software as a service " model feature rentals .
Photoshop CS6 now optionally supports Content Aware Fill for $ 1 a use or $ 15 a month ! !
! Fuck no .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of those people could get by with Photoshop Elements instead of Photoshop, and there are even cheaper alternatives if that's still too much.
Honestly, I'd prefer it keep working the way it does rather than getting a $10 gutted version with in app sales or "software as a service" model feature rentals.
Photoshop CS6 now optionally supports Content Aware Fill for $1 a use or $15 a month!!
!Fuck no.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602238</id>
	<title>I dont understand</title>
	<author>140Mandak262Jamuna</author>
	<datestamp>1269462720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sounds like something Google Street View could use to remove people from their views and make them more acceptable.</p></div><p>Why would people become more acceptable if they are removed from Google Street View?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like something Google Street View could use to remove people from their views and make them more acceptable.Why would people become more acceptable if they are removed from Google Street View ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like something Google Street View could use to remove people from their views and make them more acceptable.Why would people become more acceptable if they are removed from Google Street View?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601248</id>
	<title>Re:I for one</title>
	<author>Aladrin</author>
	<datestamp>1269459000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not the same.  Liquid Rescale moves the pieces by rescaling around them.  This actually replaces just the exact area.  I think it's quite a bit more useful, but in different ways.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not the same .
Liquid Rescale moves the pieces by rescaling around them .
This actually replaces just the exact area .
I think it 's quite a bit more useful , but in different ways .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not the same.
Liquid Rescale moves the pieces by rescaling around them.
This actually replaces just the exact area.
I think it's quite a bit more useful, but in different ways.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31606188</id>
	<title>Re:I'm convinced!</title>
	<author>dwywit</author>
	<datestamp>1269439740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>*cough*academic version*cough*<p>Is that still available? I only paid ~AUD$350 for Premiere Pro Academic/Education version (vs AUD$1200 retail), way back when I was studying.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* cough * academic version * cough * Is that still available ?
I only paid ~ AUD $ 350 for Premiere Pro Academic/Education version ( vs AUD $ 1200 retail ) , way back when I was studying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*cough*academic version*cough*Is that still available?
I only paid ~AUD$350 for Premiere Pro Academic/Education version (vs AUD$1200 retail), way back when I was studying.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601946</id>
	<title>Re:I'm convinced!</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1269461640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Photoshop currently sells at a "lightweight" $700. How many photos would I have to edit to make that cost effective?</i> </p><p>That would depend on your talent, experience, reputation and resources as a photographer - and how well you understand the market for your work. But you could recover the cost of Photoshop in a dozen or so small sales, at say, $50 to $100 each.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Photoshop currently sells at a " lightweight " $ 700 .
How many photos would I have to edit to make that cost effective ?
That would depend on your talent , experience , reputation and resources as a photographer - and how well you understand the market for your work .
But you could recover the cost of Photoshop in a dozen or so small sales , at say , $ 50 to $ 100 each .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Photoshop currently sells at a "lightweight" $700.
How many photos would I have to edit to make that cost effective?
That would depend on your talent, experience, reputation and resources as a photographer - and how well you understand the market for your work.
But you could recover the cost of Photoshop in a dozen or so small sales, at say, $50 to $100 each.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601326</id>
	<title>Re:One damn tool - pay for 200 unnecessary ones</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269459240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>noone wants to shell out $60 for 200 functions 20 of which they will use from time to time.</p></div><p>Personally, I'll shell out. I make a living using photoshop and I support the idea that a bunch of extremely talented software engineers ought to be able to make a living developing it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>noone wants to shell out $ 60 for 200 functions 20 of which they will use from time to time.Personally , I 'll shell out .
I make a living using photoshop and I support the idea that a bunch of extremely talented software engineers ought to be able to make a living developing it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>noone wants to shell out $60 for 200 functions 20 of which they will use from time to time.Personally, I'll shell out.
I make a living using photoshop and I support the idea that a bunch of extremely talented software engineers ought to be able to make a living developing it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601222</id>
	<title>Photoshop Story</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269458880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I once did  a writing contract at Adobe.  You know how when you  pose  for an  ID photo, they put you in front of a curtain or something to hide the background?   When I got my Adobe badge the security guy just posed me against  a regular wall, then Photoshopped the wall out of the picture!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I once did a writing contract at Adobe .
You know how when you pose for an ID photo , they put you in front of a curtain or something to hide the background ?
When I got my Adobe badge the security guy just posed me against a regular wall , then Photoshopped the wall out of the picture !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I once did  a writing contract at Adobe.
You know how when you  pose  for an  ID photo, they put you in front of a curtain or something to hide the background?
When I got my Adobe badge the security guy just posed me against  a regular wall, then Photoshopped the wall out of the picture!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602034</id>
	<title>Re:Very impressive.</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1269461940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If this feature would have saved 60\% - 75\% of your editing time just because she can&rsquo;t take pictures properly, you&rsquo;d probably save most of that time by simply taking the pictures yourself and making sure you don&rsquo;t cut off the edge of the object when you snap the picture.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this feature would have saved 60 \ % - 75 \ % of your editing time just because she can    t take pictures properly , you    d probably save most of that time by simply taking the pictures yourself and making sure you don    t cut off the edge of the object when you snap the picture .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this feature would have saved 60\% - 75\% of your editing time just because she can’t take pictures properly, you’d probably save most of that time by simply taking the pictures yourself and making sure you don’t cut off the edge of the object when you snap the picture.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600806</id>
	<title>Ouroboros</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1269457380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Fox News and the Texas board of Education.</p></div><p>You know what's <i>really</i> funny?  When those two <a href="http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index4.aspx?id=8203" title="state.tx.us">collide</a> [state.tx.us].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fox News and the Texas board of Education.You know what 's really funny ?
When those two collide [ state.tx.us ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fox News and the Texas board of Education.You know what's really funny?
When those two collide [state.tx.us].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600860</id>
	<title>Youtube video quality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269457620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No-one else dubious as to the actual quality of these touchups? I'm definitely not convinced when all that's available is a SD quality video that's been through YouTube's encoding, since it barely shows anything more than the basic colours and shapes are there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No-one else dubious as to the actual quality of these touchups ?
I 'm definitely not convinced when all that 's available is a SD quality video that 's been through YouTube 's encoding , since it barely shows anything more than the basic colours and shapes are there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No-one else dubious as to the actual quality of these touchups?
I'm definitely not convinced when all that's available is a SD quality video that's been through YouTube's encoding, since it barely shows anything more than the basic colours and shapes are there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602314</id>
	<title>Re:Great for crime shows!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269463080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Red Dwarf - Back to Earth did something like that already. Rimmer having Holly enhance a backwards reflection off a window from across a street to zoom in to read a card held in somebody's hand who was facing the other way</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Red Dwarf - Back to Earth did something like that already .
Rimmer having Holly enhance a backwards reflection off a window from across a street to zoom in to read a card held in somebody 's hand who was facing the other way</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Red Dwarf - Back to Earth did something like that already.
Rimmer having Holly enhance a backwards reflection off a window from across a street to zoom in to read a card held in somebody's hand who was facing the other way</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602222</id>
	<title>Re:Gimp Resynth</title>
	<author>moteyalpha</author>
	<datestamp>1269462660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thanks for that, I am always looking for new tools. I have a script that I created that explodes images to parts by texture type and allows then to be layers. The video was interesting, but it is one of many things which can be done. The combination of ImageMagick, Inkscape, blender, gimp and shell scripts allows me to do many more things with images. There are so many ways to achieve a specific result that a -single- closed method seems limiting. <br>
Nice that it only took a few seconds to open a console and <br>
apt-get install gimp-resynthesizer <br>
By taking an image or series of images or layers  it is possible to import them into blender as 3D  objects and then export / render  back to a flat with better results. The python and scheme scripting extensions are one of the many advantages of gimp and blender.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for that , I am always looking for new tools .
I have a script that I created that explodes images to parts by texture type and allows then to be layers .
The video was interesting , but it is one of many things which can be done .
The combination of ImageMagick , Inkscape , blender , gimp and shell scripts allows me to do many more things with images .
There are so many ways to achieve a specific result that a -single- closed method seems limiting .
Nice that it only took a few seconds to open a console and apt-get install gimp-resynthesizer By taking an image or series of images or layers it is possible to import them into blender as 3D objects and then export / render back to a flat with better results .
The python and scheme scripting extensions are one of the many advantages of gimp and blender .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for that, I am always looking for new tools.
I have a script that I created that explodes images to parts by texture type and allows then to be layers.
The video was interesting, but it is one of many things which can be done.
The combination of ImageMagick, Inkscape, blender, gimp and shell scripts allows me to do many more things with images.
There are so many ways to achieve a specific result that a -single- closed method seems limiting.
Nice that it only took a few seconds to open a console and 
apt-get install gimp-resynthesizer 
By taking an image or series of images or layers  it is possible to import them into blender as 3D  objects and then export / render  back to a flat with better results.
The python and scheme scripting extensions are one of the many advantages of gimp and blender.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601636</id>
	<title>this is worthless</title>
	<author>bugs2squash</author>
	<datestamp>1269460440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It fills in detail from the surroundings. I want one that fills in detail from the underlying layer. For example when you delete clothing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It fills in detail from the surroundings .
I want one that fills in detail from the underlying layer .
For example when you delete clothing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It fills in detail from the surroundings.
I want one that fills in detail from the underlying layer.
For example when you delete clothing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601232</id>
	<title>Re:I'm convinced!</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1269458940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How much is each edited photo worth to you?</p><p>Also, do you attach a great deal of value to $700?</p><p>More seriously, of course it did, $700 is not all that much for someone making or paying Western wages, so they will pay it if they need it to do business (i.e., if they think they will earn at least $700 more by purchasing it than if they did not purchase it), whereas personal users still aren't going to be that large a market at $200.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How much is each edited photo worth to you ? Also , do you attach a great deal of value to $ 700 ? More seriously , of course it did , $ 700 is not all that much for someone making or paying Western wages , so they will pay it if they need it to do business ( i.e. , if they think they will earn at least $ 700 more by purchasing it than if they did not purchase it ) , whereas personal users still are n't going to be that large a market at $ 200 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much is each edited photo worth to you?Also, do you attach a great deal of value to $700?More seriously, of course it did, $700 is not all that much for someone making or paying Western wages, so they will pay it if they need it to do business (i.e., if they think they will earn at least $700 more by purchasing it than if they did not purchase it), whereas personal users still aren't going to be that large a market at $200.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601798</id>
	<title>Re:I'm convinced!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269461100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A lot. And if you happen to edit a lot, then it is worth it. I'm designing a first person shooter, which involves creating many many textures, photoshop is very well worth it for me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot .
And if you happen to edit a lot , then it is worth it .
I 'm designing a first person shooter , which involves creating many many textures , photoshop is very well worth it for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot.
And if you happen to edit a lot, then it is worth it.
I'm designing a first person shooter, which involves creating many many textures, photoshop is very well worth it for me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603102</id>
	<title>How well does this technology work for literature?</title>
	<author>Hadlock</author>
	<datestamp>1269423000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems to have intelligent pattern awareness. I'd love to plug something like an image of the rosetta stone into it and have it fill in the words <b>in the correct languages</b> of the broken off parts. Or maybe use it to translate documents from one language to another based on it's pattern recognition (scanned pages, after all, are just complex patterns of words - nouns, verbs and adjectives)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems to have intelligent pattern awareness .
I 'd love to plug something like an image of the rosetta stone into it and have it fill in the words in the correct languages of the broken off parts .
Or maybe use it to translate documents from one language to another based on it 's pattern recognition ( scanned pages , after all , are just complex patterns of words - nouns , verbs and adjectives )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems to have intelligent pattern awareness.
I'd love to plug something like an image of the rosetta stone into it and have it fill in the words in the correct languages of the broken off parts.
Or maybe use it to translate documents from one language to another based on it's pattern recognition (scanned pages, after all, are just complex patterns of words - nouns, verbs and adjectives)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601518</id>
	<title>Great, just waiting for the internet crowd.</title>
	<author>Oasiz</author>
	<datestamp>1269459960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Imagine using this for cutting stuff like your penis and then using the content fill tool(tm).

People could compete on who would get the largest estimate !

Or nerds can finally remove their pimples from their faces easily, hurray adobe!!


I currently suffer sleep deprivation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine using this for cutting stuff like your penis and then using the content fill tool ( tm ) .
People could compete on who would get the largest estimate !
Or nerds can finally remove their pimples from their faces easily , hurray adobe ! !
I currently suffer sleep deprivation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine using this for cutting stuff like your penis and then using the content fill tool(tm).
People could compete on who would get the largest estimate !
Or nerds can finally remove their pimples from their faces easily, hurray adobe!!
I currently suffer sleep deprivation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601514</id>
	<title>Re:One damn tool - pay for 200 unnecessary ones</title>
	<author>adonoman</author>
	<datestamp>1269459960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Which is why they started selling the Elements line for $100 aimed at the home user market.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Which is why they started selling the Elements line for $ 100 aimed at the home user market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which is why they started selling the Elements line for $100 aimed at the home user market.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605752</id>
	<title>Re:I'm convinced!</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1269436800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Photoshop currently sells at a "lightweight" $700. How many photos would I have to edit to make that cost effective?</p></div><p>Just one, if that photo is valuable enough.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It entered the land of exclusive pro tool years ago.</p></div><p>That's a very odd statement, as that was its intended use from day one. It was never not in that category. It has always been relatively expensive in consumer terms, but if you're a professional photographer, it's less than the cost of one lens, so it's relatively inexpensive.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Photoshop currently sells at a " lightweight " $ 700 .
How many photos would I have to edit to make that cost effective ? Just one , if that photo is valuable enough.It entered the land of exclusive pro tool years ago.That 's a very odd statement , as that was its intended use from day one .
It was never not in that category .
It has always been relatively expensive in consumer terms , but if you 're a professional photographer , it 's less than the cost of one lens , so it 's relatively inexpensive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Photoshop currently sells at a "lightweight" $700.
How many photos would I have to edit to make that cost effective?Just one, if that photo is valuable enough.It entered the land of exclusive pro tool years ago.That's a very odd statement, as that was its intended use from day one.
It was never not in that category.
It has always been relatively expensive in consumer terms, but if you're a professional photographer, it's less than the cost of one lens, so it's relatively inexpensive.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605478</id>
	<title>MS Digital Imaging does this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269434700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft Digital Imaging 9.0 and 10.0 has this ability built in. The tool is called "smart erase", and fills in a selected area with patterns from the surrounding photo. I've had it match the pinstripes on my shirt in photos. This is a great product that has unfortunately been discontinued by Microsoft much like Flight Simulator. Even when the software was first released, it did not retail for over $50.00, much more bang for your buck than photoshop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft Digital Imaging 9.0 and 10.0 has this ability built in .
The tool is called " smart erase " , and fills in a selected area with patterns from the surrounding photo .
I 've had it match the pinstripes on my shirt in photos .
This is a great product that has unfortunately been discontinued by Microsoft much like Flight Simulator .
Even when the software was first released , it did not retail for over $ 50.00 , much more bang for your buck than photoshop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft Digital Imaging 9.0 and 10.0 has this ability built in.
The tool is called "smart erase", and fills in a selected area with patterns from the surrounding photo.
I've had it match the pinstripes on my shirt in photos.
This is a great product that has unfortunately been discontinued by Microsoft much like Flight Simulator.
Even when the software was first released, it did not retail for over $50.00, much more bang for your buck than photoshop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601342</id>
	<title>Great for crime shows!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269459300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't wait until a crime show gets ahold of this.</p><p>"Delete that wall and see what is behind it.  Enhance.  Enhance.  Enhance."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't wait until a crime show gets ahold of this .
" Delete that wall and see what is behind it .
Enhance. Enhance .
Enhance. "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't wait until a crime show gets ahold of this.
"Delete that wall and see what is behind it.
Enhance.  Enhance.
Enhance."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604050</id>
	<title>Re:I'm convinced!</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1269426780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's your response to the part you didn't bother quoting? Here it is again:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>so they will pay it if they need it to do business</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's your response to the part you did n't bother quoting ?
Here it is again : so they will pay it if they need it to do business</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's your response to the part you didn't bother quoting?
Here it is again:so they will pay it if they need it to do business
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601022</id>
	<title>welcome</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269458280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I for one welcome our automatic fake nude image generating overlord.</p><p>Boobies!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one welcome our automatic fake nude image generating overlord.Boobies !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one welcome our automatic fake nude image generating overlord.Boobies!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602586</id>
	<title>Re:I'm convinced!</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1269464100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Photoshop currently sells at a "lightweight" $700. How many photos would I have to edit to make that cost effective?</p></div><p>One.  That's why I have a legit copy of Photoshop.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Photoshop currently sells at a " lightweight " $ 700 .
How many photos would I have to edit to make that cost effective ? One .
That 's why I have a legit copy of Photoshop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Photoshop currently sells at a "lightweight" $700.
How many photos would I have to edit to make that cost effective?One.
That's why I have a legit copy of Photoshop.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602652</id>
	<title>Re:Damn.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269421200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So would Hitler, especially the part where the guy "removed a couple of Poles."</p></div><p>L O L</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So would Hitler , especially the part where the guy " removed a couple of Poles .
" L O L</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So would Hitler, especially the part where the guy "removed a couple of Poles.
"L O L
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601736</id>
	<title>Re:Nice Demo...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269460860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is an algorithm behind it called PatchMatch.  And it was presented at SIGGRAPH 2009.  Someone further down posted a link to it, really impressive the examples they show on the Princeton page talking about PatchMatch.  It looks like 2 guys from Adobe and 2 from Princeton collaborated to develop the algorithm to do this kind of stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is an algorithm behind it called PatchMatch .
And it was presented at SIGGRAPH 2009 .
Someone further down posted a link to it , really impressive the examples they show on the Princeton page talking about PatchMatch .
It looks like 2 guys from Adobe and 2 from Princeton collaborated to develop the algorithm to do this kind of stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is an algorithm behind it called PatchMatch.
And it was presented at SIGGRAPH 2009.
Someone further down posted a link to it, really impressive the examples they show on the Princeton page talking about PatchMatch.
It looks like 2 guys from Adobe and 2 from Princeton collaborated to develop the algorithm to do this kind of stuff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601548</id>
	<title>Been there, done that (for free)</title>
	<author>tjwhaynes</author>
	<datestamp>1269460080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These are graph-cut or similar algorithms. There are several free alternatives which have been out there for years. Two spring straight to mind - the resynthesizer plugin for the GIMP and GREYCStoration image inpainting.

</p><ul> <li>http://www.logarithmic.net/pfh/resynthesizer/removal</li>
<li>http://cimg.sourceforge.net/greycstoration/demonstration.shtml</li></ul><p>CS5 seems to have made this easier to use but the functionality has existed for ages.

</p><p>Cheers,
<br>Toby Haynes</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These are graph-cut or similar algorithms .
There are several free alternatives which have been out there for years .
Two spring straight to mind - the resynthesizer plugin for the GIMP and GREYCStoration image inpainting .
http : //www.logarithmic.net/pfh/resynthesizer/removal http : //cimg.sourceforge.net/greycstoration/demonstration.shtmlCS5 seems to have made this easier to use but the functionality has existed for ages .
Cheers , Toby Haynes</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These are graph-cut or similar algorithms.
There are several free alternatives which have been out there for years.
Two spring straight to mind - the resynthesizer plugin for the GIMP and GREYCStoration image inpainting.
http://www.logarithmic.net/pfh/resynthesizer/removal
http://cimg.sourceforge.net/greycstoration/demonstration.shtmlCS5 seems to have made this easier to use but the functionality has existed for ages.
Cheers,
Toby Haynes</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31606888</id>
	<title>Re:Gimp Resynth</title>
	<author>Ksevio</author>
	<datestamp>1269446820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was curious about this, so I gave it a shot.  Turns out it doesn't work by default in the windows version, it always samples the top left part of the screen.</p><p>Was a real disappointment so I searched around a bit and found someone made a fix for the script:<br><a href="http://registry.gimp.org/node/15118" title="gimp.org">http://registry.gimp.org/node/15118</a> [gimp.org]</p><p>This solves that issue so it works great!  Had a fun time editing people out of photos and such.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was curious about this , so I gave it a shot .
Turns out it does n't work by default in the windows version , it always samples the top left part of the screen.Was a real disappointment so I searched around a bit and found someone made a fix for the script : http : //registry.gimp.org/node/15118 [ gimp.org ] This solves that issue so it works great !
Had a fun time editing people out of photos and such .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was curious about this, so I gave it a shot.
Turns out it doesn't work by default in the windows version, it always samples the top left part of the screen.Was a real disappointment so I searched around a bit and found someone made a fix for the script:http://registry.gimp.org/node/15118 [gimp.org]This solves that issue so it works great!
Had a fun time editing people out of photos and such.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600676</id>
	<title>Having watched the whole thing to the end...</title>
	<author>Angostura</author>
	<datestamp>1269456840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I call <b>Shenanigans</b>. Someone has released this video a few days early.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I call Shenanigans .
Someone has released this video a few days early .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I call Shenanigans.
Someone has released this video a few days early.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600912</id>
	<title>Image Inpainting Tech created at UMN</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269457860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Guillermo Sapiro developed the first remarkable inpainting techniques. I'm sure Adobe uses similar techniques since I remember some joint research being done with the U while I was there.</p><p>http://mountains.ece.umn.edu/~guille/inpainting.htm</p><p>Go Gophers!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guillermo Sapiro developed the first remarkable inpainting techniques .
I 'm sure Adobe uses similar techniques since I remember some joint research being done with the U while I was there.http : //mountains.ece.umn.edu/ ~ guille/inpainting.htmGo Gophers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guillermo Sapiro developed the first remarkable inpainting techniques.
I'm sure Adobe uses similar techniques since I remember some joint research being done with the U while I was there.http://mountains.ece.umn.edu/~guille/inpainting.htmGo Gophers!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601216</id>
	<title>Re:Enhance</title>
	<author>arhhook</author>
	<datestamp>1269458880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"CSI Enhance" tool</p></div><p>I can see the fingerprint in the reflection on his eyeball, it must be the killer!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" CSI Enhance " toolI can see the fingerprint in the reflection on his eyeball , it must be the killer !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"CSI Enhance" toolI can see the fingerprint in the reflection on his eyeball, it must be the killer!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600750</id>
	<title>Re:I'm convinced!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269457140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People pay for Photoshop?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People pay for Photoshop ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People pay for Photoshop?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601688</id>
	<title>Re:I'm convinced!</title>
	<author>e2d2</author>
	<datestamp>1269460680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well honestly I do think $700 is a lot for me. Although I make a great living, one doesn't keep his wealth by spending it frivolously. For a business it's a no-brainer, it's a great tool for the pro. But for me? It's not worth it. I'd rather just download paint.net and use the features I can get for free. But that's just my take. Obviously it's worth something to someone otherwise they'd be out of business. Don't mind me, I'm just being cantankerous.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well honestly I do think $ 700 is a lot for me .
Although I make a great living , one does n't keep his wealth by spending it frivolously .
For a business it 's a no-brainer , it 's a great tool for the pro .
But for me ?
It 's not worth it .
I 'd rather just download paint.net and use the features I can get for free .
But that 's just my take .
Obviously it 's worth something to someone otherwise they 'd be out of business .
Do n't mind me , I 'm just being cantankerous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well honestly I do think $700 is a lot for me.
Although I make a great living, one doesn't keep his wealth by spending it frivolously.
For a business it's a no-brainer, it's a great tool for the pro.
But for me?
It's not worth it.
I'd rather just download paint.net and use the features I can get for free.
But that's just my take.
Obviously it's worth something to someone otherwise they'd be out of business.
Don't mind me, I'm just being cantankerous.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603528</id>
	<title>Re:Damn.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269424620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well he could hardly remove a single Pole.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well he could hardly remove a single Pole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well he could hardly remove a single Pole.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601554</id>
	<title>Gimp Resynth</title>
	<author>pydev</author>
	<datestamp>1269460080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That capability has been available for a while in the Gimp as part of the Resynth plugin:</p><p><a href="http://www.logarithmic.net/pfh/resynthesizer" title="logarithmic.net">http://www.logarithmic.net/pfh/resynthesizer</a> [logarithmic.net]</p><p>It lets you resynthesize a texture, fill in a selection with surrounding content, and synthesize images "in the theme" of another image.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That capability has been available for a while in the Gimp as part of the Resynth plugin : http : //www.logarithmic.net/pfh/resynthesizer [ logarithmic.net ] It lets you resynthesize a texture , fill in a selection with surrounding content , and synthesize images " in the theme " of another image .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That capability has been available for a while in the Gimp as part of the Resynth plugin:http://www.logarithmic.net/pfh/resynthesizer [logarithmic.net]It lets you resynthesize a texture, fill in a selection with surrounding content, and synthesize images "in the theme" of another image.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31609350</id>
	<title>Re:The most important question</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1269525660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That would be this one:<br><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3121/2919900856\_b2a2843b80.jpg" title="flickr.com">http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3121/2919900856\_b2a2843b80.jpg</a> [flickr.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That would be this one : http : //farm4.static.flickr.com/3121/2919900856 \ _b2a2843b80.jpg [ flickr.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would be this one:http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3121/2919900856\_b2a2843b80.jpg [flickr.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603016</id>
	<title>The potential for law enforcement is HUGE</title>
	<author>shadowrat</author>
	<datestamp>1269422640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This looks like something from CSI. Couple that with infinite zoom and 4 huge monitors in a dark room and you could reconstruct court admissible evidence with ease!<br> <br>

i can't wait till someone is convicted of murder because content aware fill draws them in a picture taken next to an alley where the crime took place!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This looks like something from CSI .
Couple that with infinite zoom and 4 huge monitors in a dark room and you could reconstruct court admissible evidence with ease !
i ca n't wait till someone is convicted of murder because content aware fill draws them in a picture taken next to an alley where the crime took place !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This looks like something from CSI.
Couple that with infinite zoom and 4 huge monitors in a dark room and you could reconstruct court admissible evidence with ease!
i can't wait till someone is convicted of murder because content aware fill draws them in a picture taken next to an alley where the crime took place!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605096</id>
	<title>Re:One damn tool - pay for 200 unnecessary ones</title>
	<author>im\_thatoneguy</author>
	<datestamp>1269432120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When you charge $100-$300 an hour $60 a year isn't exactly a financial leap of faith.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When you charge $ 100- $ 300 an hour $ 60 a year is n't exactly a financial leap of faith .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you charge $100-$300 an hour $60 a year isn't exactly a financial leap of faith.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601686</id>
	<title>Re:Nice Demo...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269460680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This seems to be legit. The youtube account has a video from October demoing the same algorithm:<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFEBamdtdiI" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFEBamdtdiI</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>This earlier video references the name of the algorithm as "PatchMatch" and says that it was developed in collaboration with Princeton and University of Washington. A quick search found this paper:<br><a href="http://www.cs.princeton.edu/gfx/pubs/Barnes\_2009\_PAR/patchmatch.pdf" title="princeton.edu" rel="nofollow">http://www.cs.princeton.edu/gfx/pubs/Barnes\_2009\_PAR/patchmatch.pdf</a> [princeton.edu]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This seems to be legit .
The youtube account has a video from October demoing the same algorithm : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = XFEBamdtdiI [ youtube.com ] This earlier video references the name of the algorithm as " PatchMatch " and says that it was developed in collaboration with Princeton and University of Washington .
A quick search found this paper : http : //www.cs.princeton.edu/gfx/pubs/Barnes \ _2009 \ _PAR/patchmatch.pdf [ princeton.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This seems to be legit.
The youtube account has a video from October demoing the same algorithm:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFEBamdtdiI [youtube.com]This earlier video references the name of the algorithm as "PatchMatch" and says that it was developed in collaboration with Princeton and University of Washington.
A quick search found this paper:http://www.cs.princeton.edu/gfx/pubs/Barnes\_2009\_PAR/patchmatch.pdf [princeton.edu]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601370</id>
	<title>Re:I'm convinced!</title>
	<author>Lumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1269459420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can still get "education" pricing on it for $199.00  and any fool can get an education copy bought for them.  Who cares about "technically legal"   I got a license key and the box and it updates, that's all that matters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can still get " education " pricing on it for $ 199.00 and any fool can get an education copy bought for them .
Who cares about " technically legal " I got a license key and the box and it updates , that 's all that matters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can still get "education" pricing on it for $199.00  and any fool can get an education copy bought for them.
Who cares about "technically legal"   I got a license key and the box and it updates, that's all that matters.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603776</id>
	<title>Re:Having watched the whole thing to the end...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269425640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's real.  This has been demoed publicly at Adobe conferences before... like "MAX" last year in LA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's real .
This has been demoed publicly at Adobe conferences before... like " MAX " last year in LA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's real.
This has been demoed publicly at Adobe conferences before... like "MAX" last year in LA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600676</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600876</id>
	<title>Re:Having watched the whole thing to the end...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269457680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Especially the last example looks awesome enough that one might think of an early Aprils fools joke, but if you look closely it seems authentic, you can spot the bits and pieces of the image that where cloned to fill in the missing information. So this seems to be an quite clever automatic-clone tool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Especially the last example looks awesome enough that one might think of an early Aprils fools joke , but if you look closely it seems authentic , you can spot the bits and pieces of the image that where cloned to fill in the missing information .
So this seems to be an quite clever automatic-clone tool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Especially the last example looks awesome enough that one might think of an early Aprils fools joke, but if you look closely it seems authentic, you can spot the bits and pieces of the image that where cloned to fill in the missing information.
So this seems to be an quite clever automatic-clone tool.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600676</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601074</id>
	<title>But will it run...</title>
	<author>Graham J - XVI</author>
	<datestamp>1269458400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...on the iPad?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...on the iPad ?
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...on the iPad?
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600796</id>
	<title>Thanks E-Harmony!</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1269457320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Great for folks who go through relationships like Octomom goes through diapers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Great for folks who go through relationships like Octomom goes through diapers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great for folks who go through relationships like Octomom goes through diapers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602394</id>
	<title>Re:Damn.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269463380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reminds me of this old story:</p><p>Content-Aware Image Resizing<br>http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/25/1835256</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of this old story : Content-Aware Image Resizinghttp : //tech.slashdot.org/article.pl ? sid = 07/08/25/1835256</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of this old story:Content-Aware Image Resizinghttp://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/25/1835256</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31631072</id>
	<title>More unbelieveable examples of content-aware fill</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269635640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some even better examples of this awesome content-aware feature:<br>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ScWu7pG7r0</p><p>So amazing!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some even better examples of this awesome content-aware feature : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 3ScWu7pG7r0So amazing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some even better examples of this awesome content-aware feature:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ScWu7pG7r0So amazing!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600978</id>
	<title>Re:I for one</title>
	<author>thedigitalbean</author>
	<datestamp>1269458040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Liquid rescale is an implementation of the Seam Carving technology which was incorporated into Photoshop CS4 as a feature titled Content Aware Scale.</p><p>This new feature comes from an algorithm titled PatchMatch which was presented at SIGGRAPH 2009:</p><p><a href="http://www.cs.princeton.edu/gfx/pubs/Barnes\_2009\_PAR/index.php" title="princeton.edu" rel="nofollow">http://www.cs.princeton.edu/gfx/pubs/Barnes\_2009\_PAR/index.php</a> [princeton.edu]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Liquid rescale is an implementation of the Seam Carving technology which was incorporated into Photoshop CS4 as a feature titled Content Aware Scale.This new feature comes from an algorithm titled PatchMatch which was presented at SIGGRAPH 2009 : http : //www.cs.princeton.edu/gfx/pubs/Barnes \ _2009 \ _PAR/index.php [ princeton.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Liquid rescale is an implementation of the Seam Carving technology which was incorporated into Photoshop CS4 as a feature titled Content Aware Scale.This new feature comes from an algorithm titled PatchMatch which was presented at SIGGRAPH 2009:http://www.cs.princeton.edu/gfx/pubs/Barnes\_2009\_PAR/index.php [princeton.edu]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603636</id>
	<title>Okay, I admit it.</title>
	<author>Tarlus</author>
	<datestamp>1269425100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's pretty fucking cool.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's pretty fucking cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's pretty fucking cool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601646</id>
	<title>Re:Having watched the whole thing to the end...</title>
	<author>metamatic</author>
	<datestamp>1269460500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A few days ago I was reading about <a href="http://www.math.ucla.edu/~imagers/htmls/inp.html" title="ucla.edu">some of the algorithms for doing this</a> [ucla.edu], shown at Siggraph in recent years. I think it's real.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A few days ago I was reading about some of the algorithms for doing this [ ucla.edu ] , shown at Siggraph in recent years .
I think it 's real .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A few days ago I was reading about some of the algorithms for doing this [ucla.edu], shown at Siggraph in recent years.
I think it's real.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600676</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601976</id>
	<title>Re:I'm convinced!</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1269461760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Photoshop currently sells at a "lightweight" $700. How many photos would I have to edit to make that cost effective?</p></div></blockquote><p>That depends on how you cost out the value of being able to make quality edits.  I.E. using 'cost effective' here is really a case of "those words not meaning what you think they mean".<br>
&nbsp; </p><blockquote><div><p>It entered the land of exclusive pro tool years ago.</p></div></blockquote><p>Hobbyist woodworkers routinely drop close to a grand on major equipment.  (My table saw cost around $800, and it's high mid range at best.)  I needed some upgraded cooking equipment for Thanksgiving (a big deal for me), so I dropped over $200 just on a knife and a roasting pan.  My neighbor, who is an amateur racer, just dropped over a grand buying a car he's going to rebuild.   Decent semi-pro cameras run $500 and up...<br>
&nbsp; <br>If I was more seriously into photography, I'd consider full on Photoshop, but a decent camera and Elements suffice for my needs.<br>
&nbsp; <br>Maybe it's too expensive for you, but serious non pros routinely drop significant cash into their hobbies.  It's a market that's faltering in the current economic conditions, but it's there none the less.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Photoshop currently sells at a " lightweight " $ 700 .
How many photos would I have to edit to make that cost effective ? That depends on how you cost out the value of being able to make quality edits .
I.E. using 'cost effective ' here is really a case of " those words not meaning what you think they mean " .
  It entered the land of exclusive pro tool years ago.Hobbyist woodworkers routinely drop close to a grand on major equipment .
( My table saw cost around $ 800 , and it 's high mid range at best .
) I needed some upgraded cooking equipment for Thanksgiving ( a big deal for me ) , so I dropped over $ 200 just on a knife and a roasting pan .
My neighbor , who is an amateur racer , just dropped over a grand buying a car he 's going to rebuild .
Decent semi-pro cameras run $ 500 and up.. .   If I was more seriously into photography , I 'd consider full on Photoshop , but a decent camera and Elements suffice for my needs .
  Maybe it 's too expensive for you , but serious non pros routinely drop significant cash into their hobbies .
It 's a market that 's faltering in the current economic conditions , but it 's there none the less .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Photoshop currently sells at a "lightweight" $700.
How many photos would I have to edit to make that cost effective?That depends on how you cost out the value of being able to make quality edits.
I.E. using 'cost effective' here is really a case of "those words not meaning what you think they mean".
  It entered the land of exclusive pro tool years ago.Hobbyist woodworkers routinely drop close to a grand on major equipment.
(My table saw cost around $800, and it's high mid range at best.
)  I needed some upgraded cooking equipment for Thanksgiving (a big deal for me), so I dropped over $200 just on a knife and a roasting pan.
My neighbor, who is an amateur racer, just dropped over a grand buying a car he's going to rebuild.
Decent semi-pro cameras run $500 and up...
  If I was more seriously into photography, I'd consider full on Photoshop, but a decent camera and Elements suffice for my needs.
  Maybe it's too expensive for you, but serious non pros routinely drop significant cash into their hobbies.
It's a market that's faltering in the current economic conditions, but it's there none the less.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603710</id>
	<title>My alternative</title>
	<author>caywen</author>
	<datestamp>1269425460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd just fill the selection with stars, hydrogen dust, and asteroids. That is, after all, contextual to everything and is never completely wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd just fill the selection with stars , hydrogen dust , and asteroids .
That is , after all , contextual to everything and is never completely wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd just fill the selection with stars, hydrogen dust, and asteroids.
That is, after all, contextual to everything and is never completely wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601446</id>
	<title>Another youtube video about content-aware fill</title>
	<author>chebucto</author>
	<datestamp>1269459720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Includes more detail about the algo<br>- Developed with researches at Princeton<br>- Demo'd at SIGGRAPH in Aug. 2009<br>- Old spot-healing tool tried to find one match for the hole; new tool copies multiple patches from the surrounding BG to fit into the hole, as well as finding &amp; copying surrounding patterns</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9vbHRcrbdQ&amp;feature=related" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9vbHRcrbdQ&amp;feature=related</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Includes more detail about the algo- Developed with researches at Princeton- Demo 'd at SIGGRAPH in Aug. 2009- Old spot-healing tool tried to find one match for the hole ; new tool copies multiple patches from the surrounding BG to fit into the hole , as well as finding &amp; copying surrounding patternshttp : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = S9vbHRcrbdQ&amp;feature = related [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Includes more detail about the algo- Developed with researches at Princeton- Demo'd at SIGGRAPH in Aug. 2009- Old spot-healing tool tried to find one match for the hole; new tool copies multiple patches from the surrounding BG to fit into the hole, as well as finding &amp; copying surrounding patternshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9vbHRcrbdQ&amp;feature=related [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601186</id>
	<title>Lens Flares</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269458820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Using Photoshop to <em>remove</em> lens flares?  Oh!  Brave new world!</p><p>-Peter</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Using Photoshop to remove lens flares ?
Oh ! Brave new world ! -Peter</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Using Photoshop to remove lens flares?
Oh!  Brave new world!-Peter</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602074</id>
	<title>camera? what camera?</title>
	<author>mugurel</author>
	<datestamp>1269462120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>a few more years and they'll make up the whole picture.</htmltext>
<tokenext>a few more years and they 'll make up the whole picture .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a few more years and they'll make up the whole picture.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603318</id>
	<title>Re:I'll believe it when</title>
	<author>Gaerek</author>
	<datestamp>1269423900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you've ever used photoshop, you would understand what it takes just to get to that part. Ever try removing a tree from an image in PS? Then have the sky look natural? That's almost impossible for the average user, and probably at least an hour (or more) of work from someone who knows what they are doing. Fixing the mistakes at that point is easy. This is could possibly be one of the most revolutionary tools in photoshop since the clone stamp.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 've ever used photoshop , you would understand what it takes just to get to that part .
Ever try removing a tree from an image in PS ?
Then have the sky look natural ?
That 's almost impossible for the average user , and probably at least an hour ( or more ) of work from someone who knows what they are doing .
Fixing the mistakes at that point is easy .
This is could possibly be one of the most revolutionary tools in photoshop since the clone stamp .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you've ever used photoshop, you would understand what it takes just to get to that part.
Ever try removing a tree from an image in PS?
Then have the sky look natural?
That's almost impossible for the average user, and probably at least an hour (or more) of work from someone who knows what they are doing.
Fixing the mistakes at that point is easy.
This is could possibly be one of the most revolutionary tools in photoshop since the clone stamp.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604930</id>
	<title>Re:Gimp Resynth</title>
	<author>moonbender</author>
	<datestamp>1269431160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nice! Lets you do some pretty incredible stuff. So far I haven't been able to do stuff that's in the same league as the CS5 demo, which is probably due to a) my lack of skill, b) the suitability of the chosen images (random holiday snapshots in my case) but also c) the fact that the PS stuff is based on more recent research. It's still really cool though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice !
Lets you do some pretty incredible stuff .
So far I have n't been able to do stuff that 's in the same league as the CS5 demo , which is probably due to a ) my lack of skill , b ) the suitability of the chosen images ( random holiday snapshots in my case ) but also c ) the fact that the PS stuff is based on more recent research .
It 's still really cool though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice!
Lets you do some pretty incredible stuff.
So far I haven't been able to do stuff that's in the same league as the CS5 demo, which is probably due to a) my lack of skill, b) the suitability of the chosen images (random holiday snapshots in my case) but also c) the fact that the PS stuff is based on more recent research.
It's still really cool though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601430</id>
	<title>Re:I'm convinced!</title>
	<author>metamatic</author>
	<datestamp>1269459660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it's like any of the other fancy healing tools, it'll make its way into the $99 PhotoShop Elements. The existing magic healing brush did.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it 's like any of the other fancy healing tools , it 'll make its way into the $ 99 PhotoShop Elements .
The existing magic healing brush did .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it's like any of the other fancy healing tools, it'll make its way into the $99 PhotoShop Elements.
The existing magic healing brush did.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605484</id>
	<title>The Last Photo has a bird flying!</title>
	<author>RockoW</author>
	<datestamp>1269434700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm very impressed but in the last picture (the landscape one) i think that is really impossible.
The process even put a flying bird in the upper left corner.

It doesn't feel like that is even possible.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm very impressed but in the last picture ( the landscape one ) i think that is really impossible .
The process even put a flying bird in the upper left corner .
It does n't feel like that is even possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm very impressed but in the last picture (the landscape one) i think that is really impossible.
The process even put a flying bird in the upper left corner.
It doesn't feel like that is even possible.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602618</id>
	<title>There's also Liquid Rescale...</title>
	<author>phallstrom</author>
	<datestamp>1269464220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not into graphics much, but this seems similar to what Liquid Rescale can do.</p><p><a href="http://liquidrescale.wikidot.com/en:examples" title="wikidot.com">http://liquidrescale.wikidot.com/en:examples</a> [wikidot.com]</p><p>At the 3:45 mark in the first video they show removing elements.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not into graphics much , but this seems similar to what Liquid Rescale can do.http : //liquidrescale.wikidot.com/en : examples [ wikidot.com ] At the 3 : 45 mark in the first video they show removing elements .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not into graphics much, but this seems similar to what Liquid Rescale can do.http://liquidrescale.wikidot.com/en:examples [wikidot.com]At the 3:45 mark in the first video they show removing elements.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600548</id>
	<title>Damn.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269456420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stalin would have just loved that content-aware fill tool.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stalin would have just loved that content-aware fill tool.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stalin would have just loved that content-aware fill tool.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602216</id>
	<title>Dont trust the demo</title>
	<author>140Mandak262Jamuna</author>
	<datestamp>1269462660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looks like it has been photoshopped. Not real.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like it has been photoshopped .
Not real .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like it has been photoshopped.
Not real.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31607626</id>
	<title>Re:The Last Photo has a bird flying!</title>
	<author>ytpete</author>
	<datestamp>1269457980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Uh, dude, that's not a bird... it's the mouse cursor.  Watch a few seconds earlier and you'll see the spinning progress cursor in the same exact location.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Uh , dude , that 's not a bird... it 's the mouse cursor .
Watch a few seconds earlier and you 'll see the spinning progress cursor in the same exact location .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uh, dude, that's not a bird... it's the mouse cursor.
Watch a few seconds earlier and you'll see the spinning progress cursor in the same exact location.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600922</id>
	<title>Omnomnom</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269457920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like to pirate each Adobe CS just for the sake of having such expensive software. XD</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like to pirate each Adobe CS just for the sake of having such expensive software .
XD</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like to pirate each Adobe CS just for the sake of having such expensive software.
XD</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600830</id>
	<title>Nice Demo...</title>
	<author>ndykman</author>
	<datestamp>1269457500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wish there was a paper on the core algorithms behind it (cmon Adobe, SIGGRAPH), but I could see why Adobe may be sitting on every aspect of this tool; because it sure seems to bring some real photoshop wizardry to the common user. It was really an example of "delete this thing" and it just works. Takes a common complex task and massively simplifies it. One of the most impressive marketing demos I've seen in a while.</p><p>Sure, there are some cases in which I doubt it works, but from what I could see, it seemed to have some vision and perceptual rules built in to guide how to fill in the deleted area. And frankly, it's a feature that for professionals, makes the price tag for the upgrade worth it. For some tasks, it'd pay for itself in labor alone. What would take a expert hours to do, this could do in minutes. If I was Adobe, I'd seriously consider taking this and make a Photoshop Elements Extended Edition (or whatever) and add about 79-99 bucks to this price for this feature alone. Arguably, it'd be worth it for many.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish there was a paper on the core algorithms behind it ( cmon Adobe , SIGGRAPH ) , but I could see why Adobe may be sitting on every aspect of this tool ; because it sure seems to bring some real photoshop wizardry to the common user .
It was really an example of " delete this thing " and it just works .
Takes a common complex task and massively simplifies it .
One of the most impressive marketing demos I 've seen in a while.Sure , there are some cases in which I doubt it works , but from what I could see , it seemed to have some vision and perceptual rules built in to guide how to fill in the deleted area .
And frankly , it 's a feature that for professionals , makes the price tag for the upgrade worth it .
For some tasks , it 'd pay for itself in labor alone .
What would take a expert hours to do , this could do in minutes .
If I was Adobe , I 'd seriously consider taking this and make a Photoshop Elements Extended Edition ( or whatever ) and add about 79-99 bucks to this price for this feature alone .
Arguably , it 'd be worth it for many .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish there was a paper on the core algorithms behind it (cmon Adobe, SIGGRAPH), but I could see why Adobe may be sitting on every aspect of this tool; because it sure seems to bring some real photoshop wizardry to the common user.
It was really an example of "delete this thing" and it just works.
Takes a common complex task and massively simplifies it.
One of the most impressive marketing demos I've seen in a while.Sure, there are some cases in which I doubt it works, but from what I could see, it seemed to have some vision and perceptual rules built in to guide how to fill in the deleted area.
And frankly, it's a feature that for professionals, makes the price tag for the upgrade worth it.
For some tasks, it'd pay for itself in labor alone.
What would take a expert hours to do, this could do in minutes.
If I was Adobe, I'd seriously consider taking this and make a Photoshop Elements Extended Edition (or whatever) and add about 79-99 bucks to this price for this feature alone.
Arguably, it'd be worth it for many.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601134</id>
	<title>Re:STOP!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269458640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did you watch it? This is really cool technology.</p><p>Frankly if I'm not coming to Slashdot to see the latest and greatest toys, technology, and, yes, products then what is the point...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you watch it ?
This is really cool technology.Frankly if I 'm not coming to Slashdot to see the latest and greatest toys , technology , and , yes , products then what is the point.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you watch it?
This is really cool technology.Frankly if I'm not coming to Slashdot to see the latest and greatest toys, technology, and, yes, products then what is the point...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601842</id>
	<title>Re:I for one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269461280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uh, no. That is the patch tool. If you'd read the article and watched the video you'd know that this is far more complex than that.</p><p>The content aware healing brush and fill are taking hundreds of small sections from neighboring areas of the image and piecing them in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uh , no .
That is the patch tool .
If you 'd read the article and watched the video you 'd know that this is far more complex than that.The content aware healing brush and fill are taking hundreds of small sections from neighboring areas of the image and piecing them in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uh, no.
That is the patch tool.
If you'd read the article and watched the video you'd know that this is far more complex than that.The content aware healing brush and fill are taking hundreds of small sections from neighboring areas of the image and piecing them in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600696</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603310</id>
	<title>Great...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269423780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now your ex-girlfriend won't even need to tear holes off her group photos.<br>At least I can finally fix those scary faces of lurkers in pics for "when you see it, you'll shit bricks" pics.</p><p>Freedom of "speech" lawsuits coming in 5...4...3...2...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now your ex-girlfriend wo n't even need to tear holes off her group photos.At least I can finally fix those scary faces of lurkers in pics for " when you see it , you 'll shit bricks " pics.Freedom of " speech " lawsuits coming in 5...4...3...2.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now your ex-girlfriend won't even need to tear holes off her group photos.At least I can finally fix those scary faces of lurkers in pics for "when you see it, you'll shit bricks" pics.Freedom of "speech" lawsuits coming in 5...4...3...2...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601066</id>
	<title>Bye "Mom"!</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1269458400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It'll be a great "mother-in-law" tool for family photos.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 'll be a great " mother-in-law " tool for family photos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It'll be a great "mother-in-law" tool for family photos.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603766</id>
	<title>Re:Damn.....</title>
	<author>Tumbleweed</author>
	<datestamp>1269425640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Stalin would have just loved that content-aware fill tool.....</i></p><p>"What Cosmonaut? I don't see any Cosmonaut."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stalin would have just loved that content-aware fill tool..... " What Cosmonaut ?
I do n't see any Cosmonaut .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stalin would have just loved that content-aware fill tool....."What Cosmonaut?
I don't see any Cosmonaut.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602306</id>
	<title>Re:Having watched the whole thing to the end...</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1269463020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've watched the video a few times now, especially toward the end.</p><p>It could well be a fake. We'll find out shortly, I think.</p><p>I'd like to see uncompressed copies of the before and after, that's for sure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've watched the video a few times now , especially toward the end.It could well be a fake .
We 'll find out shortly , I think.I 'd like to see uncompressed copies of the before and after , that 's for sure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've watched the video a few times now, especially toward the end.It could well be a fake.
We'll find out shortly, I think.I'd like to see uncompressed copies of the before and after, that's for sure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600716</id>
	<title>Google Street View</title>
	<author>ISoldat53</author>
	<datestamp>1269456960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like something Google Street View could use to remove people from their views and make them more acceptable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like something Google Street View could use to remove people from their views and make them more acceptable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like something Google Street View could use to remove people from their views and make them more acceptable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600624</id>
	<title>Damn</title>
	<author>mahiskali</author>
	<datestamp>1269456660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I took a basic digital image processing class in college, we learned some of the basics of image processing (really more segementation than anything).

To think about the complexity and sheer power needed to do this...just blows my mind.  Truly impressive.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I took a basic digital image processing class in college , we learned some of the basics of image processing ( really more segementation than anything ) .
To think about the complexity and sheer power needed to do this...just blows my mind .
Truly impressive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I took a basic digital image processing class in college, we learned some of the basics of image processing (really more segementation than anything).
To think about the complexity and sheer power needed to do this...just blows my mind.
Truly impressive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601234</id>
	<title>mod3 0p</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269458940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">good to write you own lube, b2everage,</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>good to write you own lube , b2everage , [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>good to write you own lube, b2everage, [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31621112</id>
	<title>Re:Enhance</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269530580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right, exactly, one of the most annoying non-existent technologies in the movies!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right , exactly , one of the most annoying non-existent technologies in the movies !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right, exactly, one of the most annoying non-existent technologies in the movies!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604480</id>
	<title>Re:I'm convinced!</title>
	<author>lgarner</author>
	<datestamp>1269428640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"It entered the land of exclusive pro tool years ago."</p><p>You're right, and the answer to your question is likely "one".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" It entered the land of exclusive pro tool years ago .
" You 're right , and the answer to your question is likely " one " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It entered the land of exclusive pro tool years ago.
"You're right, and the answer to your question is likely "one".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603104</id>
	<title>Re:Nice Demo...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269423000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did you really just say "cmon Adobe, SIGGRAPH"?  Adobe had 18 papers in SIGGRAPH 2009.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you really just say " cmon Adobe , SIGGRAPH " ?
Adobe had 18 papers in SIGGRAPH 2009 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you really just say "cmon Adobe, SIGGRAPH"?
Adobe had 18 papers in SIGGRAPH 2009.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604654</id>
	<title>suspicions</title>
	<author>jgowen</author>
	<datestamp>1269429420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suspect "Content Aware" means it *knows* it's fixing a lawn, or sky. The fix on the panaramic sky inserted a new cloud on the left! Cool, but will it know to insert a new zoo animal when you remove the concession stand in the zoo? The comment about seeing a detailed result is right-on, too; these things *often* look much better from a distance.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect " Content Aware " means it * knows * it 's fixing a lawn , or sky .
The fix on the panaramic sky inserted a new cloud on the left !
Cool , but will it know to insert a new zoo animal when you remove the concession stand in the zoo ?
The comment about seeing a detailed result is right-on , too ; these things * often * look much better from a distance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect "Content Aware" means it *knows* it's fixing a lawn, or sky.
The fix on the panaramic sky inserted a new cloud on the left!
Cool, but will it know to insert a new zoo animal when you remove the concession stand in the zoo?
The comment about seeing a detailed result is right-on, too; these things *often* look much better from a distance.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601438</id>
	<title>Re:Altered reality?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269459660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why don't you just erase your mom from those pictures?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>timothy</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't you just erase your mom from those pictures ?
; ) timothy</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't you just erase your mom from those pictures?
;)timothy</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601506</id>
	<title>Re:One damn tool - pay for 200 unnecessary ones</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1269459960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>...because you also put there 180 or so ones that noone will use.</i></p><p>Peter Noone, great grandfather of Doctor McCoy: "I'm a musician, dammit, not a photographer!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...because you also put there 180 or so ones that noone will use.Peter Noone , great grandfather of Doctor McCoy : " I 'm a musician , dammit , not a photographer !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...because you also put there 180 or so ones that noone will use.Peter Noone, great grandfather of Doctor McCoy: "I'm a musician, dammit, not a photographer!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602974</id>
	<title>Re:One damn tool - pay for 200 unnecessary ones</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269422460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you really flaming the number of features in a *professional* tool. In fact the industry standard tool, that many many people, myself included, earn a living using. If you think its $60 you are sadly mistaken.</p><p>And to those who earn a living writing software like Photoshop, kudos, you are artists. I will gladly not steal from you as you are putting thousands of man hours into each feature.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you really flaming the number of features in a * professional * tool .
In fact the industry standard tool , that many many people , myself included , earn a living using .
If you think its $ 60 you are sadly mistaken.And to those who earn a living writing software like Photoshop , kudos , you are artists .
I will gladly not steal from you as you are putting thousands of man hours into each feature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you really flaming the number of features in a *professional* tool.
In fact the industry standard tool, that many many people, myself included, earn a living using.
If you think its $60 you are sadly mistaken.And to those who earn a living writing software like Photoshop, kudos, you are artists.
I will gladly not steal from you as you are putting thousands of man hours into each feature.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601502</id>
	<title>Re:Nice Demo...</title>
	<author>RGreen</author>
	<datestamp>1269459900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's based on "Gradient Based Image Completion by solving the Poisson Equation":<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://www2.mae.cuhk.edu.hk/~cwang/pubs/C&amp;GImageCompletion.pdf" title="cuhk.edu.hk" rel="nofollow">http://www2.mae.cuhk.edu.hk/~cwang/pubs/C&amp;GImageCompletion.pdf</a> [cuhk.edu.hk]</p><p>Plus a bunch of other related papers that Siggraph people have been playing with for some years now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's based on " Gradient Based Image Completion by solving the Poisson Equation " :         http : //www2.mae.cuhk.edu.hk/ ~ cwang/pubs/C&amp;GImageCompletion.pdf [ cuhk.edu.hk ] Plus a bunch of other related papers that Siggraph people have been playing with for some years now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's based on "Gradient Based Image Completion by solving the Poisson Equation":
        http://www2.mae.cuhk.edu.hk/~cwang/pubs/C&amp;GImageCompletion.pdf [cuhk.edu.hk]Plus a bunch of other related papers that Siggraph people have been playing with for some years now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603874</id>
	<title>Re:One damn tool - pay for 200 unnecessary ones</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269426000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>$60?!?  Where the hell are YOu buying photoshop?  Add a zero to that value there bro.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>$ 60 ? ! ?
Where the hell are YOu buying photoshop ?
Add a zero to that value there bro .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>$60?!?
Where the hell are YOu buying photoshop?
Add a zero to that value there bro.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601000</id>
	<title>Similar open source tools</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269458160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://cimg.sourceforge.net/greycstoration/demonstration.shtml<br>(Image Inpainting section)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //cimg.sourceforge.net/greycstoration/demonstration.shtml ( Image Inpainting section )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://cimg.sourceforge.net/greycstoration/demonstration.shtml(Image Inpainting section)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601804</id>
	<title>Re:Having watched the whole thing to the end...</title>
	<author>ElectricTurtle</author>
	<datestamp>1269461100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, clearly the images where Photoshopped. I could tell from some of the pixels and having seen quite a few Photoshops in my time... er, wait a minute...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , clearly the images where Photoshopped .
I could tell from some of the pixels and having seen quite a few Photoshops in my time... er , wait a minute.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, clearly the images where Photoshopped.
I could tell from some of the pixels and having seen quite a few Photoshops in my time... er, wait a minute...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600676</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668</id>
	<title>I'm convinced!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269456780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Photoshop currently sells at a "lightweight" $700. How many photos would I have to edit to make that cost effective? It entered the land of exclusive pro tool years ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Photoshop currently sells at a " lightweight " $ 700 .
How many photos would I have to edit to make that cost effective ?
It entered the land of exclusive pro tool years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Photoshop currently sells at a "lightweight" $700.
How many photos would I have to edit to make that cost effective?
It entered the land of exclusive pro tool years ago.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600988</id>
	<title>Re:I for one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269458100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mod parent down for not RTFA; this has nothing to do with liquid rescale.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod parent down for not RTFA ; this has nothing to do with liquid rescale .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod parent down for not RTFA; this has nothing to do with liquid rescale.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605868</id>
	<title>Re:The most important question</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1269437640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Butt plug? Tree trunk?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Butt plug ?
Tree trunk ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Butt plug?
Tree trunk?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601048</id>
	<title>Re:Having watched the whole thing to the end...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269458340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I&rsquo;m not so sure. How&rsquo;d it know that the small hill on the right side of the picture should go down in the new area it created? How&rsquo;d it know that the horizon on the left edge should go up?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I    m not so sure .
How    d it know that the small hill on the right side of the picture should go down in the new area it created ?
How    d it know that the horizon on the left edge should go up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I’m not so sure.
How’d it know that the small hill on the right side of the picture should go down in the new area it created?
How’d it know that the horizon on the left edge should go up?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31606282</id>
	<title>Re:Damn.....</title>
	<author>roman\_mir</author>
	<datestamp>1269440760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think Hitler had PS beat to this goal, he had a <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/61/German\_MP40\_Machine\_Pistol.jpg/800px-German\_MP40\_Machine\_Pistol.jpg" title="wikimedia.org">much simpler tool</a> [wikimedia.org] and when the bodies are removed, you can never really tell that the picture was photoshopped !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Hitler had PS beat to this goal , he had a much simpler tool [ wikimedia.org ] and when the bodies are removed , you can never really tell that the picture was photoshopped !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Hitler had PS beat to this goal, he had a much simpler tool [wikimedia.org] and when the bodies are removed, you can never really tell that the picture was photoshopped !</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601034</id>
	<title>Now watch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269458280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now watch for FOSS fanboys claiming that this feature already exists via some obscure plugin to Gimp or whatnot. Of course, it won't even be close to the real thing. I didn't check, but someone has probably already made this post.</p><p>Yet another example of innovation in a commercial product, now watch how open source clones struggle over the next couple of years to make a 1:1 copy and eventually either failing due to the technical difficulty or making it horribly user-unfriendly in the process. If the former, they will claim "no one needs this feature" and if the latter, "shut up and read the README in the root of the tarball".</p><p>Expecting flamebait so posting Anon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now watch for FOSS fanboys claiming that this feature already exists via some obscure plugin to Gimp or whatnot .
Of course , it wo n't even be close to the real thing .
I did n't check , but someone has probably already made this post.Yet another example of innovation in a commercial product , now watch how open source clones struggle over the next couple of years to make a 1 : 1 copy and eventually either failing due to the technical difficulty or making it horribly user-unfriendly in the process .
If the former , they will claim " no one needs this feature " and if the latter , " shut up and read the README in the root of the tarball " .Expecting flamebait so posting Anon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now watch for FOSS fanboys claiming that this feature already exists via some obscure plugin to Gimp or whatnot.
Of course, it won't even be close to the real thing.
I didn't check, but someone has probably already made this post.Yet another example of innovation in a commercial product, now watch how open source clones struggle over the next couple of years to make a 1:1 copy and eventually either failing due to the technical difficulty or making it horribly user-unfriendly in the process.
If the former, they will claim "no one needs this feature" and if the latter, "shut up and read the README in the root of the tarball".Expecting flamebait so posting Anon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601894</id>
	<title>Re:Nice Demo...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269461460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is not quite the same, but "Content-Aware Image Resizing" from SIGGRAPH 2007 has some of the same functionality--you can increase the size of an image, for example, and it fills in detail that wasn't in the original image.  I'm guessing this is the starting point for Adobe's algorithm.  Have a look:<br>http://www.faculty.idc.ac.il/arik/site/seam-carve.asp</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is not quite the same , but " Content-Aware Image Resizing " from SIGGRAPH 2007 has some of the same functionality--you can increase the size of an image , for example , and it fills in detail that was n't in the original image .
I 'm guessing this is the starting point for Adobe 's algorithm .
Have a look : http : //www.faculty.idc.ac.il/arik/site/seam-carve.asp</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is not quite the same, but "Content-Aware Image Resizing" from SIGGRAPH 2007 has some of the same functionality--you can increase the size of an image, for example, and it fills in detail that wasn't in the original image.
I'm guessing this is the starting point for Adobe's algorithm.
Have a look:http://www.faculty.idc.ac.il/arik/site/seam-carve.asp</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601218</id>
	<title>I'll believe it when</title>
	<author>Lumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1269458880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I see a 12 megapixel image in hand of a before and after and not a tiny less than 400 pixel overcompressed youtube video.</p><p>I have seen this automatic stuff before and when you look carefully at it it's not very clean unless you re-sample down to 1/4 the resolution or go small for web use.. it's never clean enough to print out at 11X17 or larger.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I see a 12 megapixel image in hand of a before and after and not a tiny less than 400 pixel overcompressed youtube video.I have seen this automatic stuff before and when you look carefully at it it 's not very clean unless you re-sample down to 1/4 the resolution or go small for web use.. it 's never clean enough to print out at 11X17 or larger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see a 12 megapixel image in hand of a before and after and not a tiny less than 400 pixel overcompressed youtube video.I have seen this automatic stuff before and when you look carefully at it it's not very clean unless you re-sample down to 1/4 the resolution or go small for web use.. it's never clean enough to print out at 11X17 or larger.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600994</id>
	<title>Re:Enhance</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269458160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, no, that's "take a 1mp super grainy noisy photo from a 7-11 security camera and put on magic filters and super zoom to see a strand of hair from 100 feet away that shows that the attacker owns a golden retriever and thus you should check the registered animal database for a golden retriever that is in a 100 yard radius from the attack location".</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , no , that 's " take a 1mp super grainy noisy photo from a 7-11 security camera and put on magic filters and super zoom to see a strand of hair from 100 feet away that shows that the attacker owns a golden retriever and thus you should check the registered animal database for a golden retriever that is in a 100 yard radius from the attack location " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, no, that's "take a 1mp super grainy noisy photo from a 7-11 security camera and put on magic filters and super zoom to see a strand of hair from 100 feet away that shows that the attacker owns a golden retriever and thus you should check the registered animal database for a golden retriever that is in a 100 yard radius from the attack location".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600744</id>
	<title>Re:Early preorders are already in from</title>
	<author>ColdWetDog</author>
	<datestamp>1269457080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Fox News and the Texas board of Education.</p></div></blockquote><p>
I don't think it will work on text or video and besides, it's been easy to clone in dinosaurs since version 4.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fox News and the Texas board of Education .
I do n't think it will work on text or video and besides , it 's been easy to clone in dinosaurs since version 4 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fox News and the Texas board of Education.
I don't think it will work on text or video and besides, it's been easy to clone in dinosaurs since version 4.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604270</id>
	<title>Re:Damn.....</title>
	<author>mobby\_6kl</author>
	<datestamp>1269427800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, this was Stalin's favorite part as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , this was Stalin 's favorite part as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, this was Stalin's favorite part as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604704</id>
	<title>LiquidRescale</title>
	<author>pydev</author>
	<datestamp>1269429720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another useful "advanced" plugin is LiquidRescale:</p><p><a href="http://liquidrescale.wikidot.com/" title="wikidot.com">http://liquidrescale.wikidot.com/</a> [wikidot.com]</p><p>It implements seam carving.  It's not yet available as an Ubuntu package, but hopefully someone will package it up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another useful " advanced " plugin is LiquidRescale : http : //liquidrescale.wikidot.com/ [ wikidot.com ] It implements seam carving .
It 's not yet available as an Ubuntu package , but hopefully someone will package it up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another useful "advanced" plugin is LiquidRescale:http://liquidrescale.wikidot.com/ [wikidot.com]It implements seam carving.
It's not yet available as an Ubuntu package, but hopefully someone will package it up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31607534</id>
	<title>No more looting...</title>
	<author>nixkuroi</author>
	<datestamp>1269456720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Next time, Hurricane survivors won't be accused of looting, they'll simply be edited out of the shot and the news will say that everyone escaped unharmed.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-o</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Next time , Hurricane survivors wo n't be accused of looting , they 'll simply be edited out of the shot and the news will say that everyone escaped unharmed .
: -o</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next time, Hurricane survivors won't be accused of looting, they'll simply be edited out of the shot and the news will say that everyone escaped unharmed.
:-o</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31647622</id>
	<title>Re:For the doubters...</title>
	<author>connellybarnes</author>
	<datestamp>1269794400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seam carving removes continuous seams (wavy lines) of pixels that are hard to perceive after being removed. Thus it's well suited for changing the aspect ratio of images (in Photoshop this is called content aware scale), since if you remove a seam the image gains or loses a whole row or column of pixels. But it's less suited for filling in big holes, where you need to find the right textural pattern to put in the hole. To do this we made a new tech called "patchmatch" that basically dices the image into little squares (patches) and then matches similar patches<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-). We used this core tech in a global optimization, where good matches outside the hole are pasted in the hole, averaged, and then this is repeated until convergence. I did this at an internship at Adobe.

<a href="http://www.cs.princeton.edu/gfx/pubs/Barnes\_2009\_PAR/index.php" title="princeton.edu" rel="nofollow">http://www.cs.princeton.edu/gfx/pubs/Barnes\_2009\_PAR/index.php</a> [princeton.edu]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seam carving removes continuous seams ( wavy lines ) of pixels that are hard to perceive after being removed .
Thus it 's well suited for changing the aspect ratio of images ( in Photoshop this is called content aware scale ) , since if you remove a seam the image gains or loses a whole row or column of pixels .
But it 's less suited for filling in big holes , where you need to find the right textural pattern to put in the hole .
To do this we made a new tech called " patchmatch " that basically dices the image into little squares ( patches ) and then matches similar patches : - ) .
We used this core tech in a global optimization , where good matches outside the hole are pasted in the hole , averaged , and then this is repeated until convergence .
I did this at an internship at Adobe .
http : //www.cs.princeton.edu/gfx/pubs/Barnes \ _2009 \ _PAR/index.php [ princeton.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seam carving removes continuous seams (wavy lines) of pixels that are hard to perceive after being removed.
Thus it's well suited for changing the aspect ratio of images (in Photoshop this is called content aware scale), since if you remove a seam the image gains or loses a whole row or column of pixels.
But it's less suited for filling in big holes, where you need to find the right textural pattern to put in the hole.
To do this we made a new tech called "patchmatch" that basically dices the image into little squares (patches) and then matches similar patches :-).
We used this core tech in a global optimization, where good matches outside the hole are pasted in the hole, averaged, and then this is repeated until convergence.
I did this at an internship at Adobe.
http://www.cs.princeton.edu/gfx/pubs/Barnes\_2009\_PAR/index.php [princeton.edu]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602546</id>
	<title>Re:STOP!</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1269463980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Stop with the ads! That's like the 4th one today.</p></div><p>News Flash:  Most of the 'news for nerds' we care about involves products we can go buy.  You're going to have to try another meme to earn a mod point.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stop with the ads !
That 's like the 4th one today.News Flash : Most of the 'news for nerds ' we care about involves products we can go buy .
You 're going to have to try another meme to earn a mod point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stop with the ads!
That's like the 4th one today.News Flash:  Most of the 'news for nerds' we care about involves products we can go buy.
You're going to have to try another meme to earn a mod point.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31606426</id>
	<title>Re:Nice Demo...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269441900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A video demonstrating the feature at Siggraph 2007.<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIFCV2spKtg" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIFCV2spKtg</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>It also describe the algorithm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A video demonstrating the feature at Siggraph 2007.http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = vIFCV2spKtg [ youtube.com ] It also describe the algorithm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A video demonstrating the feature at Siggraph 2007.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIFCV2spKtg [youtube.com]It also describe the algorithm.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602270</id>
	<title>Re:I'm convinced!</title>
	<author>bigstrat2003</author>
	<datestamp>1269462900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>$700 is not all that much for someone making or paying Western wages</p></div><p>Whoa, dude. It's definitely a decent sum depending on a lot of factors (what you do, where you live, etc). I make a pretty good amount for my area at $35k/year... but $700 would be pushing two weeks' net pay for me (net pay is $970 atm, with taxes withheld and insurance premiums and such).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>$ 700 is not all that much for someone making or paying Western wagesWhoa , dude .
It 's definitely a decent sum depending on a lot of factors ( what you do , where you live , etc ) .
I make a pretty good amount for my area at $ 35k/year... but $ 700 would be pushing two weeks ' net pay for me ( net pay is $ 970 atm , with taxes withheld and insurance premiums and such ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>$700 is not all that much for someone making or paying Western wagesWhoa, dude.
It's definitely a decent sum depending on a lot of factors (what you do, where you live, etc).
I make a pretty good amount for my area at $35k/year... but $700 would be pushing two weeks' net pay for me (net pay is $970 atm, with taxes withheld and insurance premiums and such).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600798</id>
	<title>Very impressive.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269457380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I edit photos for my sisters business (she's terrible at taking photos of her products, always cutting bits off I have to fill out and work around) and I can safely say this feature would have saved around 60\% of my editing time. That's a conservative estimate- probable around 75\%.</p><p>Can't speak for you guys, but I'm sold.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I edit photos for my sisters business ( she 's terrible at taking photos of her products , always cutting bits off I have to fill out and work around ) and I can safely say this feature would have saved around 60 \ % of my editing time .
That 's a conservative estimate- probable around 75 \ % .Ca n't speak for you guys , but I 'm sold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I edit photos for my sisters business (she's terrible at taking photos of her products, always cutting bits off I have to fill out and work around) and I can safely say this feature would have saved around 60\% of my editing time.
That's a conservative estimate- probable around 75\%.Can't speak for you guys, but I'm sold.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31607020</id>
	<title>Re:One damn tool - pay for 200 unnecessary ones</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269448200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cool, too bad Adobe doesn't seem to have any even marginally talented engineers these days.  They used to be impressive, now days they seem to be more like EA than a real software house.</p><p>They have 'requirements' that prevent their 'core technology' from running on case sensitive file systems<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...  You may not understand what a retarded statement that is, but ask any developer whos done cross platform work have trivial of an issue it is to deal with.  You can literally fix any problems your software has with a sed script in most languages UNLESS you actually go out of your way to break things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cool , too bad Adobe does n't seem to have any even marginally talented engineers these days .
They used to be impressive , now days they seem to be more like EA than a real software house.They have 'requirements ' that prevent their 'core technology ' from running on case sensitive file systems ... You may not understand what a retarded statement that is , but ask any developer whos done cross platform work have trivial of an issue it is to deal with .
You can literally fix any problems your software has with a sed script in most languages UNLESS you actually go out of your way to break things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cool, too bad Adobe doesn't seem to have any even marginally talented engineers these days.
They used to be impressive, now days they seem to be more like EA than a real software house.They have 'requirements' that prevent their 'core technology' from running on case sensitive file systems ...  You may not understand what a retarded statement that is, but ask any developer whos done cross platform work have trivial of an issue it is to deal with.
You can literally fix any problems your software has with a sed script in most languages UNLESS you actually go out of your way to break things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600568</id>
	<title>I for one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269456480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Welcome my "catching up to GIMP from 2007" overlords at Adobe: <a href="http://liquidrescale.wikidot.com/" title="wikidot.com" rel="nofollow">http://liquidrescale.wikidot.com/</a> [wikidot.com]</p><p>Sorry wikidot, I hope you have Slashdotation Insurance (or is that included in the new health shindig?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Welcome my " catching up to GIMP from 2007 " overlords at Adobe : http : //liquidrescale.wikidot.com/ [ wikidot.com ] Sorry wikidot , I hope you have Slashdotation Insurance ( or is that included in the new health shindig ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Welcome my "catching up to GIMP from 2007" overlords at Adobe: http://liquidrescale.wikidot.com/ [wikidot.com]Sorry wikidot, I hope you have Slashdotation Insurance (or is that included in the new health shindig?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601258</id>
	<title>Re:Enhance</title>
	<author>ckhorne</author>
	<datestamp>1269459000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reminds me of this:</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUFkb0d1kbU" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUFkb0d1kbU</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of this : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = KUFkb0d1kbU [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of this:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUFkb0d1kbU [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605288</id>
	<title>Re:Damn.....</title>
	<author>AmigaMMC</author>
	<datestamp>1269433320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> just about anybody in a position of authority in any government wants this</p></div><p>That's not true! I'm not in a position of authority and I want it!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>just about anybody in a position of authority in any government wants thisThat 's not true !
I 'm not in a position of authority and I want it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> just about anybody in a position of authority in any government wants thisThat's not true!
I'm not in a position of authority and I want it!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601944</id>
	<title>Re:Google Street View</title>
	<author>Robin47</author>
	<datestamp>1269461640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not sure how this tool make the people more acceptable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure how this tool make the people more acceptable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure how this tool make the people more acceptable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605916</id>
	<title>Re:I'll believe it when</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1269437880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I have seen this automatic stuff before and when you look carefully at it it's not very clean unless you re-sample down to 1/4 the resolution or go small for web use.. it's never clean enough to print out at 11X17 or larger.</p></div><p>I've seen professional retouching (hell, I do it myself) and it's usually not very clean, either. Nobody prints or views 11x17 prints these days, except for images intended for an art gallery exhibition. The majority of images are used on the web, or maybe printed in a magazine.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have seen this automatic stuff before and when you look carefully at it it 's not very clean unless you re-sample down to 1/4 the resolution or go small for web use.. it 's never clean enough to print out at 11X17 or larger.I 've seen professional retouching ( hell , I do it myself ) and it 's usually not very clean , either .
Nobody prints or views 11x17 prints these days , except for images intended for an art gallery exhibition .
The majority of images are used on the web , or maybe printed in a magazine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have seen this automatic stuff before and when you look carefully at it it's not very clean unless you re-sample down to 1/4 the resolution or go small for web use.. it's never clean enough to print out at 11X17 or larger.I've seen professional retouching (hell, I do it myself) and it's usually not very clean, either.
Nobody prints or views 11x17 prints these days, except for images intended for an art gallery exhibition.
The majority of images are used on the web, or maybe printed in a magazine.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605058</id>
	<title>Goodbye Watermarks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269431880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now people can get rid of all those annoying watermarks on images that people don't want you to use!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now people can get rid of all those annoying watermarks on images that people do n't want you to use !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now people can get rid of all those annoying watermarks on images that people don't want you to use!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601624</id>
	<title>Re:I for one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269460440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Basically it's like an <b>intelligent, automated</b> version of the Clone Brush tool on steroids.</i></p><p>There, I've highlighted for you why it's a big thing.  I can't quite tell if you were unable to determine this fact because you're a moron or if you have some kind of language processing brain defect that makes you unable to consciously pick out salient points of information.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Basically it 's like an intelligent , automated version of the Clone Brush tool on steroids.There , I 've highlighted for you why it 's a big thing .
I ca n't quite tell if you were unable to determine this fact because you 're a moron or if you have some kind of language processing brain defect that makes you unable to consciously pick out salient points of information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Basically it's like an intelligent, automated version of the Clone Brush tool on steroids.There, I've highlighted for you why it's a big thing.
I can't quite tell if you were unable to determine this fact because you're a moron or if you have some kind of language processing brain defect that makes you unable to consciously pick out salient points of information.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600696</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31612356</id>
	<title>Finally I'll be able to...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269537600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uncrop those old photos! I always wondered what my great-great-grandmothers only half visible-in-an-old-photograph dog really looked like.</p><p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUFkb0d1kbU</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uncrop those old photos !
I always wondered what my great-great-grandmothers only half visible-in-an-old-photograph dog really looked like.http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = KUFkb0d1kbU</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uncrop those old photos!
I always wondered what my great-great-grandmothers only half visible-in-an-old-photograph dog really looked like.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUFkb0d1kbU</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600884</id>
	<title>Re:Google Street View</title>
	<author>Albert Sandberg</author>
	<datestamp>1269457740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Sounds like something Google Street View could use to remove people from their views and make them more acceptable.</i></p><p>And then a bug occurs and only black people gets erased and they're screeeeewed!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like something Google Street View could use to remove people from their views and make them more acceptable.And then a bug occurs and only black people gets erased and they 're screeeeewed !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like something Google Street View could use to remove people from their views and make them more acceptable.And then a bug occurs and only black people gets erased and they're screeeeewed!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600952</id>
	<title>For the doubters...</title>
	<author>Op911</author>
	<datestamp>1269457980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wasn't this core technology discussed on Slashdot a number of years back?  If you google "Seam Carving" you'll find some nice wikipedia articles that discuss content-aware image resizing.  This may be a variant on the same technology, and i actually doubt that this is an early release of an April Fool's Day joke (no matter how Star Trek this technology seems).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't this core technology discussed on Slashdot a number of years back ?
If you google " Seam Carving " you 'll find some nice wikipedia articles that discuss content-aware image resizing .
This may be a variant on the same technology , and i actually doubt that this is an early release of an April Fool 's Day joke ( no matter how Star Trek this technology seems ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't this core technology discussed on Slashdot a number of years back?
If you google "Seam Carving" you'll find some nice wikipedia articles that discuss content-aware image resizing.
This may be a variant on the same technology, and i actually doubt that this is an early release of an April Fool's Day joke (no matter how Star Trek this technology seems).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601244</id>
	<title>How does it handle patterns</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269459000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd like to see this perform on a patterned background. It's one thing to fill in a gradient, quite another to reproduce a pattern and repeat it properly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like to see this perform on a patterned background .
It 's one thing to fill in a gradient , quite another to reproduce a pattern and repeat it properly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd like to see this perform on a patterned background.
It's one thing to fill in a gradient, quite another to reproduce a pattern and repeat it properly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604586</id>
	<title>Gimp has this feature too!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269429120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought about purchasing Photoshop for this feature, but it turns out our productive geeks out there have already implemented a plugin for the GIMP.</p><p>http://liquidrescale.wikidot.com/en:examples</p><p>I've used it.  It works!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought about purchasing Photoshop for this feature , but it turns out our productive geeks out there have already implemented a plugin for the GIMP.http : //liquidrescale.wikidot.com/en : examplesI 've used it .
It works !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought about purchasing Photoshop for this feature, but it turns out our productive geeks out there have already implemented a plugin for the GIMP.http://liquidrescale.wikidot.com/en:examplesI've used it.
It works!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603218</id>
	<title>Can be done with The Gimp</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269423480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I quickly grabbed some screen shots of the images used in the demo and ran them through the GIMP "Smart remove selection" resynthesizer plugin (http://logarithmic.net/pfh/resynthesizer). The results were pretty good.</p><p>I uploaded the screen capture to <a href="http://tinypic.com/player.php?v=1sgw88&amp;s=5" title="tinypic.com" rel="nofollow">http://tinypic.com/player.php?v=1sgw88&amp;s=5</a> [tinypic.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I quickly grabbed some screen shots of the images used in the demo and ran them through the GIMP " Smart remove selection " resynthesizer plugin ( http : //logarithmic.net/pfh/resynthesizer ) .
The results were pretty good.I uploaded the screen capture to http : //tinypic.com/player.php ? v = 1sgw88&amp;s = 5 [ tinypic.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I quickly grabbed some screen shots of the images used in the demo and ran them through the GIMP "Smart remove selection" resynthesizer plugin (http://logarithmic.net/pfh/resynthesizer).
The results were pretty good.I uploaded the screen capture to http://tinypic.com/player.php?v=1sgw88&amp;s=5 [tinypic.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600882</id>
	<title>The most important question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269457740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder what sort of a fig leaf it will use to plug the gap in the goatse photo...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder what sort of a fig leaf it will use to plug the gap in the goatse photo.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder what sort of a fig leaf it will use to plug the gap in the goatse photo...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604596</id>
	<title>Re:Now watch</title>
	<author>Fantastic Lad</author>
	<datestamp>1269429180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, people who get paid to develop full time are going to get there first.  And slaves sure fill those cotton baskets faster than unionized workers.  Nobody contests these facts.</p><p>But here's the thing; Open source projects, given enough time will generally get there.</p><p>When I started using Abiword, it crashed all the time.  Now it's awesome; it's exactly what I want.  A lightweight, reliable, intuitive dedicated word processor.  I like how it scrolls; it doesn't automatically jump a document up to the center of the page when my cursor nears the bottom of the screen.  You can't turn that shit off in other programs, but a 6 Meg word processor which I use all the time does just what I want and I didn't pay a dime for it.  In fact, pretty much anything I need to do on my computer, I can type in, "[Random Application I Need] Open Source" and multiple choices will emerge.  Generally I'll wind up using a very powerful and user-friendly bit of software whose creators have been honing to perfection for several years.</p><p>Open source software just keeps improving over time, and it doesn't vanish because a CEO decides to kill a product line because not enough Muggles are paying.</p><p>Right now, the model of our economy is such that everybody runs on money and debt.  That model happens to be good at generating new technology quickly.  Great.  But the downside is that everybody is forced to work too hard and we are surrounded by toxic shit and psychopathic corporations and creepy Obama-droids who have learned how to charm people while accelerating Bush policies and passing backassward health care bills.</p><p>I wouldn't mind living with a slower lifestyle if it meant people could relax a bit and take better care of themselves and each other.  In a perfect world, people would make great stuff without needing greed and fear and government to motivate them.  I see that behavior in a lot of people already; that's where open source anything comes from.  People wanting to build cool stuff themselves.  Heck, I like to build cool stuff.  But we can't devote ourselves fully to such projects so long as Captain Industry is at the helm and banks keep is debt.</p><p>-FL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , people who get paid to develop full time are going to get there first .
And slaves sure fill those cotton baskets faster than unionized workers .
Nobody contests these facts.But here 's the thing ; Open source projects , given enough time will generally get there.When I started using Abiword , it crashed all the time .
Now it 's awesome ; it 's exactly what I want .
A lightweight , reliable , intuitive dedicated word processor .
I like how it scrolls ; it does n't automatically jump a document up to the center of the page when my cursor nears the bottom of the screen .
You ca n't turn that shit off in other programs , but a 6 Meg word processor which I use all the time does just what I want and I did n't pay a dime for it .
In fact , pretty much anything I need to do on my computer , I can type in , " [ Random Application I Need ] Open Source " and multiple choices will emerge .
Generally I 'll wind up using a very powerful and user-friendly bit of software whose creators have been honing to perfection for several years.Open source software just keeps improving over time , and it does n't vanish because a CEO decides to kill a product line because not enough Muggles are paying.Right now , the model of our economy is such that everybody runs on money and debt .
That model happens to be good at generating new technology quickly .
Great. But the downside is that everybody is forced to work too hard and we are surrounded by toxic shit and psychopathic corporations and creepy Obama-droids who have learned how to charm people while accelerating Bush policies and passing backassward health care bills.I would n't mind living with a slower lifestyle if it meant people could relax a bit and take better care of themselves and each other .
In a perfect world , people would make great stuff without needing greed and fear and government to motivate them .
I see that behavior in a lot of people already ; that 's where open source anything comes from .
People wanting to build cool stuff themselves .
Heck , I like to build cool stuff .
But we ca n't devote ourselves fully to such projects so long as Captain Industry is at the helm and banks keep is debt.-FL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, people who get paid to develop full time are going to get there first.
And slaves sure fill those cotton baskets faster than unionized workers.
Nobody contests these facts.But here's the thing; Open source projects, given enough time will generally get there.When I started using Abiword, it crashed all the time.
Now it's awesome; it's exactly what I want.
A lightweight, reliable, intuitive dedicated word processor.
I like how it scrolls; it doesn't automatically jump a document up to the center of the page when my cursor nears the bottom of the screen.
You can't turn that shit off in other programs, but a 6 Meg word processor which I use all the time does just what I want and I didn't pay a dime for it.
In fact, pretty much anything I need to do on my computer, I can type in, "[Random Application I Need] Open Source" and multiple choices will emerge.
Generally I'll wind up using a very powerful and user-friendly bit of software whose creators have been honing to perfection for several years.Open source software just keeps improving over time, and it doesn't vanish because a CEO decides to kill a product line because not enough Muggles are paying.Right now, the model of our economy is such that everybody runs on money and debt.
That model happens to be good at generating new technology quickly.
Great.  But the downside is that everybody is forced to work too hard and we are surrounded by toxic shit and psychopathic corporations and creepy Obama-droids who have learned how to charm people while accelerating Bush policies and passing backassward health care bills.I wouldn't mind living with a slower lifestyle if it meant people could relax a bit and take better care of themselves and each other.
In a perfect world, people would make great stuff without needing greed and fear and government to motivate them.
I see that behavior in a lot of people already; that's where open source anything comes from.
People wanting to build cool stuff themselves.
Heck, I like to build cool stuff.
But we can't devote ourselves fully to such projects so long as Captain Industry is at the helm and banks keep is debt.-FL</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600982</id>
	<title>Took a little while</title>
	<author>djlemma</author>
	<datestamp>1269458100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I remember reading about folks at Carnegie Mellon building this tool a few years ago.. Sure enough, there's a <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/07/08/09/131207/Algorithm-Seamlessly-Patches-Holes-In-Images" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">slashdot article.</a> [slashdot.org] <br> <br>
I suppose the photoshop tool only pulls from material in the photo you're editing, and not from outside sources.. so it's a bit different.  But the goals/results are pretty similar, it seems.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember reading about folks at Carnegie Mellon building this tool a few years ago.. Sure enough , there 's a slashdot article .
[ slashdot.org ] I suppose the photoshop tool only pulls from material in the photo you 're editing , and not from outside sources.. so it 's a bit different .
But the goals/results are pretty similar , it seems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember reading about folks at Carnegie Mellon building this tool a few years ago.. Sure enough, there's a slashdot article.
[slashdot.org]  
I suppose the photoshop tool only pulls from material in the photo you're editing, and not from outside sources.. so it's a bit different.
But the goals/results are pretty similar, it seems.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602528</id>
	<title>One word: wow!</title>
	<author>bradley13</author>
	<datestamp>1269463920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just "wow". Everyone who has spent tedious hours "fixing" some piece of "almost" perfect photography just fell off of their chairs.

</p><p>I haven't bothered upgrading anything but InDesign in recent years - the old Photoshop (or even GIMP) was good enough. <i>This</i> is a reason to upgrade!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just " wow " .
Everyone who has spent tedious hours " fixing " some piece of " almost " perfect photography just fell off of their chairs .
I have n't bothered upgrading anything but InDesign in recent years - the old Photoshop ( or even GIMP ) was good enough .
This is a reason to upgrade !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just "wow".
Everyone who has spent tedious hours "fixing" some piece of "almost" perfect photography just fell off of their chairs.
I haven't bothered upgrading anything but InDesign in recent years - the old Photoshop (or even GIMP) was good enough.
This is a reason to upgrade!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601458</id>
	<title>Re:Nice Demo...</title>
	<author>marcansoft</author>
	<datestamp>1269459780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.cs.princeton.edu/gfx/pubs/Barnes\_2009\_PAR/index.php" title="princeton.edu">Here</a> [princeton.edu]'s the paper, from a comment above.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here [ princeton.edu ] 's the paper , from a comment above .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here [princeton.edu]'s the paper, from a comment above.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603870</id>
	<title>Re:I'm convinced!</title>
	<author>ModernGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1269426000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At $75 an hour, about 10 customers with about 90 minutes of combined work would pay for your investment.  It's just the cost of doing business.  Adobe has done the hard part for you, $700 is nothing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At $ 75 an hour , about 10 customers with about 90 minutes of combined work would pay for your investment .
It 's just the cost of doing business .
Adobe has done the hard part for you , $ 700 is nothing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At $75 an hour, about 10 customers with about 90 minutes of combined work would pay for your investment.
It's just the cost of doing business.
Adobe has done the hard part for you, $700 is nothing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600570</id>
	<title>Altered reality?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269456480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cool!  Maybe I can use it to create a picture of me with a girlfriend so my mom will get off my back!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cool !
Maybe I can use it to create a picture of me with a girlfriend so my mom will get off my back !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cool!
Maybe I can use it to create a picture of me with a girlfriend so my mom will get off my back!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602160</id>
	<title>Re:Lens Flares</title>
	<author>Skadet</author>
	<datestamp>1269462480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sweet Lord, I wish I had mod points for you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sweet Lord , I wish I had mod points for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sweet Lord, I wish I had mod points for you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601880</id>
	<title>The Difference Between an Ad and "Holy Crap!!"</title>
	<author>RobotRunAmok</author>
	<datestamp>1269461400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm usually among the first in line to call Slashdot on its thinly-disguised slashvertisements, but this goes beyond product upgrade and into the realm of William Gibson novel.</p><p>I'm kind of staggered just trying to wrap my head around the uses and implications...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm usually among the first in line to call Slashdot on its thinly-disguised slashvertisements , but this goes beyond product upgrade and into the realm of William Gibson novel.I 'm kind of staggered just trying to wrap my head around the uses and implications.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm usually among the first in line to call Slashdot on its thinly-disguised slashvertisements, but this goes beyond product upgrade and into the realm of William Gibson novel.I'm kind of staggered just trying to wrap my head around the uses and implications...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602420</id>
	<title>So ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269463560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How well does it handle boobs?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How well does it handle boobs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How well does it handle boobs?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604372</id>
	<title>Re:Having watched the whole thing to the end...</title>
	<author>PhilHibbs</author>
	<datestamp>1269428160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, did it guess right? Is that the way that the landscape really slopes? Serious answer: It doesn't "know" it, that's just the result of whatever algorithm it uses. If you can demonstrate that it got the answer perfectly correct, then I'll be suspicious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , did it guess right ?
Is that the way that the landscape really slopes ?
Serious answer : It does n't " know " it , that 's just the result of whatever algorithm it uses .
If you can demonstrate that it got the answer perfectly correct , then I 'll be suspicious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, did it guess right?
Is that the way that the landscape really slopes?
Serious answer: It doesn't "know" it, that's just the result of whatever algorithm it uses.
If you can demonstrate that it got the answer perfectly correct, then I'll be suspicious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600832</id>
	<title>Enhance</title>
	<author>SimonTheSoundMan</author>
	<datestamp>1269457500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Next up is the "CSI Enhance" tool.  Take a photo of 10x10 pixels, and make it a perfect 2MP image.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Next up is the " CSI Enhance " tool .
Take a photo of 10x10 pixels , and make it a perfect 2MP image .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next up is the "CSI Enhance" tool.
Take a photo of 10x10 pixels, and make it a perfect 2MP image.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601030</id>
	<title>Re:I for one</title>
	<author>BlackPignouf</author>
	<datestamp>1269458280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Welcome my "getting modded Insightful for not RTFA and spreading bullshit" overlords at Slashdot.</p><p>Content-aware scaling has been included in Photoshop since CS4.</p><p>But this is no scaling, it's filling. The first 3 minutes of the video are not so interesting (nothing one could not do with a clone stamp in 2 seconds), but the last 2 minutes are breath-taking.</p><p>GREYCstoration or liquidrescale don't even come close.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Welcome my " getting modded Insightful for not RTFA and spreading bullshit " overlords at Slashdot.Content-aware scaling has been included in Photoshop since CS4.But this is no scaling , it 's filling .
The first 3 minutes of the video are not so interesting ( nothing one could not do with a clone stamp in 2 seconds ) , but the last 2 minutes are breath-taking.GREYCstoration or liquidrescale do n't even come close .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Welcome my "getting modded Insightful for not RTFA and spreading bullshit" overlords at Slashdot.Content-aware scaling has been included in Photoshop since CS4.But this is no scaling, it's filling.
The first 3 minutes of the video are not so interesting (nothing one could not do with a clone stamp in 2 seconds), but the last 2 minutes are breath-taking.GREYCstoration or liquidrescale don't even come close.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601214</id>
	<title>GreyCstoration or G'MIC anyone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269458880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Similar algorithms have been around for a LONG time.</p><p>http://gmic.sourceforge.net/gimp.shtml<br>http://cimg.sourceforge.net/greycstoration/demonstration.shtml<br>http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/09/131207</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Similar algorithms have been around for a LONG time.http : //gmic.sourceforge.net/gimp.shtmlhttp : //cimg.sourceforge.net/greycstoration/demonstration.shtmlhttp : //tech.slashdot.org/article.pl ? sid = 07/08/09/131207</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Similar algorithms have been around for a LONG time.http://gmic.sourceforge.net/gimp.shtmlhttp://cimg.sourceforge.net/greycstoration/demonstration.shtmlhttp://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/09/131207</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601192</id>
	<title>Re:Having watched the whole thing to the end...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269458820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just noticed something... the description for the video says " From retouching to completely reimagining an image, heres an early glimpse of <strong>what could happen</strong> in the future when you press the delete key."</p><p>What COULD happen... sounds like this is just a concept...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just noticed something... the description for the video says " From retouching to completely reimagining an image , heres an early glimpse of what could happen in the future when you press the delete key .
" What COULD happen... sounds like this is just a concept.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just noticed something... the description for the video says " From retouching to completely reimagining an image, heres an early glimpse of what could happen in the future when you press the delete key.
"What COULD happen... sounds like this is just a concept...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600676</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601054</id>
	<title>Re:Damn.....</title>
	<author>carcosa30</author>
	<datestamp>1269458400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So would Hitler, especially the part where the guy "removed a couple of Poles."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So would Hitler , especially the part where the guy " removed a couple of Poles .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So would Hitler, especially the part where the guy "removed a couple of Poles.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604238</id>
	<title>Great, have they figured out how to deal with case</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1269427620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>sensitive file systems yet?</p><p>How many releases do you need to fix whatever retarded things you're doing to filenames to make case sensitivity a freaking issue?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>sensitive file systems yet ? How many releases do you need to fix whatever retarded things you 're doing to filenames to make case sensitivity a freaking issue ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sensitive file systems yet?How many releases do you need to fix whatever retarded things you're doing to filenames to make case sensitivity a freaking issue?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31606258</id>
	<title>bye bye baby jesus</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269440520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now i can remove every baby jesus from every manger.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now i can remove every baby jesus from every manger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now i can remove every baby jesus from every manger.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600616</id>
	<title>Early preorders are already in from</title>
	<author>sir\_eccles</author>
	<datestamp>1269456660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fox News and the Texas board of Education.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fox News and the Texas board of Education .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fox News and the Texas board of Education.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600672</id>
	<title>Re:I for one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269456840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Umm, if GIMP was ever able to interpret fill EDGES!  Did you even watch the video?  It is holy impressive how it filled in the edge gaps of this panorama image at the end of the video.  Just, WOW!  I WANT TO SEE THE CODE THAT DOES THIS SO BAD!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm , if GIMP was ever able to interpret fill EDGES !
Did you even watch the video ?
It is holy impressive how it filled in the edge gaps of this panorama image at the end of the video .
Just , WOW !
I WANT TO SEE THE CODE THAT DOES THIS SO BAD !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm, if GIMP was ever able to interpret fill EDGES!
Did you even watch the video?
It is holy impressive how it filled in the edge gaps of this panorama image at the end of the video.
Just, WOW!
I WANT TO SEE THE CODE THAT DOES THIS SO BAD!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31607862</id>
	<title>PaintShop Photo Pro X3</title>
	<author>EricTheO</author>
	<datestamp>1269550200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Smart Carver - Seamlessly remove objects from an image with professional quality. The Smart Carver also lets you expand or contract objects without distortion."</p><p>This tool may not be quite as sophisticated but it's cheaper than CS5 Photoshop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Smart Carver - Seamlessly remove objects from an image with professional quality .
The Smart Carver also lets you expand or contract objects without distortion .
" This tool may not be quite as sophisticated but it 's cheaper than CS5 Photoshop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Smart Carver - Seamlessly remove objects from an image with professional quality.
The Smart Carver also lets you expand or contract objects without distortion.
"This tool may not be quite as sophisticated but it's cheaper than CS5 Photoshop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601294</id>
	<title>Re:Enhance</title>
	<author>Dachannien</author>
	<datestamp>1269459180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clearly, that's over the top, but you'd be surprised at the sorts of super-resolution techniques that are out there already.  Most (but not all) techniques require multiple frames of the same image with enough jitter from one frame to the next so that what you lose in spatial sampling you make up in temporal sampling.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly , that 's over the top , but you 'd be surprised at the sorts of super-resolution techniques that are out there already .
Most ( but not all ) techniques require multiple frames of the same image with enough jitter from one frame to the next so that what you lose in spatial sampling you make up in temporal sampling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly, that's over the top, but you'd be surprised at the sorts of super-resolution techniques that are out there already.
Most (but not all) techniques require multiple frames of the same image with enough jitter from one frame to the next so that what you lose in spatial sampling you make up in temporal sampling.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600696</id>
	<title>Re:I for one</title>
	<author>Zocalo</author>
	<datestamp>1269456900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Photoshop has had that capability natively (ie, not requiring a plugin) since CS4, this is the ability to select an object in an image - litter on a lawn was the example given in the article - and replace its former location in the image with content derived from the surrounding areas.  Basically it's like an intelligent, automated version of the Clone Brush tool on steroids.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Photoshop has had that capability natively ( ie , not requiring a plugin ) since CS4 , this is the ability to select an object in an image - litter on a lawn was the example given in the article - and replace its former location in the image with content derived from the surrounding areas .
Basically it 's like an intelligent , automated version of the Clone Brush tool on steroids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Photoshop has had that capability natively (ie, not requiring a plugin) since CS4, this is the ability to select an object in an image - litter on a lawn was the example given in the article - and replace its former location in the image with content derived from the surrounding areas.
Basically it's like an intelligent, automated version of the Clone Brush tool on steroids.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601660</id>
	<title>Re:One damn tool - pay for 200 unnecessary ones</title>
	<author>XnavxeMiyyep</author>
	<datestamp>1269460560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I usually get every other version of Photoshop. Got CS, skipped CS2, got CS3, skipped CS4, and now CS5 looks pretty awesome.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I usually get every other version of Photoshop .
Got CS , skipped CS2 , got CS3 , skipped CS4 , and now CS5 looks pretty awesome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I usually get every other version of Photoshop.
Got CS, skipped CS2, got CS3, skipped CS4, and now CS5 looks pretty awesome.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602770</id>
	<title>Re:I'm convinced!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269421740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if you use Photoshop professionally (and are worth your salt) youre hopefully charging at a minimum $50 an hour. so not that long, actually.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if you use Photoshop professionally ( and are worth your salt ) youre hopefully charging at a minimum $ 50 an hour .
so not that long , actually .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if you use Photoshop professionally (and are worth your salt) youre hopefully charging at a minimum $50 an hour.
so not that long, actually.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601788</id>
	<title>For what it&rsquo;s worth...</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1269461040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I found a higher-resolution (cropped) copy of the panorama used in the video:</p><p><a href="http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/7\_deathvalley.jpg" title="scottkelby.com">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/7\_deathvalley.jpg</a> [scottkelby.com]</p><p>(According to <a href="http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2009/archives/3281#" title="scottkelby.com">the description here</a> [scottkelby.com], photomerge, dodge, burn, and sponge were used, but basically only the colours have been changed.)</p><p>Composite I made of image from YouTube video + image from the blog: <a href="http://i.imagehost.org/0273/deathvalley.jpg" title="imagehost.org">here</a> [imagehost.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I found a higher-resolution ( cropped ) copy of the panorama used in the video : http : //www.scottkelby.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/7 \ _deathvalley.jpg [ scottkelby.com ] ( According to the description here [ scottkelby.com ] , photomerge , dodge , burn , and sponge were used , but basically only the colours have been changed .
) Composite I made of image from YouTube video + image from the blog : here [ imagehost.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I found a higher-resolution (cropped) copy of the panorama used in the video:http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/7\_deathvalley.jpg [scottkelby.com](According to the description here [scottkelby.com], photomerge, dodge, burn, and sponge were used, but basically only the colours have been changed.
)Composite I made of image from YouTube video + image from the blog: here [imagehost.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602404</id>
	<title>Re:I'm convinced!</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1269463440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Photoshop currently sells at a "lightweight" $700. How many photos would I have to edit to make that cost effective? It entered the land of exclusive pro tool years ago.</i> </p><p>Photoshop isn't a tool for the point and click digital photographer with his $250 Canon.</p><p>But in the "prosumer" market you can begin by spending $1,000 on a camera body alone. Cost effective to the amateur photographer at this level translates into less time spend in the digital darkroom.</p><p>He may also make the occasional sale at $50 to $100.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Photoshop currently sells at a " lightweight " $ 700 .
How many photos would I have to edit to make that cost effective ?
It entered the land of exclusive pro tool years ago .
Photoshop is n't a tool for the point and click digital photographer with his $ 250 Canon.But in the " prosumer " market you can begin by spending $ 1,000 on a camera body alone .
Cost effective to the amateur photographer at this level translates into less time spend in the digital darkroom.He may also make the occasional sale at $ 50 to $ 100 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Photoshop currently sells at a "lightweight" $700.
How many photos would I have to edit to make that cost effective?
It entered the land of exclusive pro tool years ago.
Photoshop isn't a tool for the point and click digital photographer with his $250 Canon.But in the "prosumer" market you can begin by spending $1,000 on a camera body alone.
Cost effective to the amateur photographer at this level translates into less time spend in the digital darkroom.He may also make the occasional sale at $50 to $100.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603956</id>
	<title>Re:Enhance</title>
	<author>Wescotte</author>
	<datestamp>1269426360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They sorta have it..

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCr96ldClz4" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCr96ldClz4</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>They sorta have it. . http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = dCr96ldClz4 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They sorta have it..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCr96ldClz4 [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602460</id>
	<title>Re:Nice Demo...</title>
	<author>Oscaro</author>
	<datestamp>1269463740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is pretty old stuff, see http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/69211/siggraph05\_0265\_final.pdf for example (but I'm sure I've read older articles on similar techniques).</p><p>At one point there was even a gimp plugin that worked decently well. Here: http://www.logarithmic.net/pfh/resynthesizer/removal</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is pretty old stuff , see http : //research.microsoft.com/pubs/69211/siggraph05 \ _0265 \ _final.pdf for example ( but I 'm sure I 've read older articles on similar techniques ) .At one point there was even a gimp plugin that worked decently well .
Here : http : //www.logarithmic.net/pfh/resynthesizer/removal</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is pretty old stuff, see http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/69211/siggraph05\_0265\_final.pdf for example (but I'm sure I've read older articles on similar techniques).At one point there was even a gimp plugin that worked decently well.
Here: http://www.logarithmic.net/pfh/resynthesizer/removal</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601002</id>
	<title>Re:I for one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269458160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why is this idiot modded informative? He should be modded off-topic and clearly didn't read the article... I guess neither did the mods.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is this idiot modded informative ?
He should be modded off-topic and clearly did n't read the article... I guess neither did the mods .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is this idiot modded informative?
He should be modded off-topic and clearly didn't read the article... I guess neither did the mods.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603278</id>
	<title>Re:One damn tool - pay for 200 unnecessary ones</title>
	<author>djlemma</author>
	<datestamp>1269423660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>isnt the way with the software companies these days ? fill a software with innumerable features even professionals will rarely use, and ask $60-100 for 20 to 30 functions/features that people will use, because you also put there 180 or so ones that noone will use.</p><p>that's why software is being pirated. noone wants to shell out $60 for 200 functions 20 of which they will use from time to time.</p></div><p>Especially when photoshop costs $600.
<br> <br>
Although, I'm actually likely to purchase is (and lightroom) pretty soon.  I have a good job, I do tons of photography, and the cost of the combo is on par with what it cost in the film days to get a darkroom set up.
<br> <br>
I'm probably also going to set up a darkroom, but I'm not sure which one is going to come first.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>isnt the way with the software companies these days ?
fill a software with innumerable features even professionals will rarely use , and ask $ 60-100 for 20 to 30 functions/features that people will use , because you also put there 180 or so ones that noone will use.that 's why software is being pirated .
noone wants to shell out $ 60 for 200 functions 20 of which they will use from time to time.Especially when photoshop costs $ 600 .
Although , I 'm actually likely to purchase is ( and lightroom ) pretty soon .
I have a good job , I do tons of photography , and the cost of the combo is on par with what it cost in the film days to get a darkroom set up .
I 'm probably also going to set up a darkroom , but I 'm not sure which one is going to come first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>isnt the way with the software companies these days ?
fill a software with innumerable features even professionals will rarely use, and ask $60-100 for 20 to 30 functions/features that people will use, because you also put there 180 or so ones that noone will use.that's why software is being pirated.
noone wants to shell out $60 for 200 functions 20 of which they will use from time to time.Especially when photoshop costs $600.
Although, I'm actually likely to purchase is (and lightroom) pretty soon.
I have a good job, I do tons of photography, and the cost of the combo is on par with what it cost in the film days to get a darkroom set up.
I'm probably also going to set up a darkroom, but I'm not sure which one is going to come first.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601806</id>
	<title>Re:One damn tool - pay for 200 unnecessary ones</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269461100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt;<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I support the idea that a bunch of <b>extremely talented software engineers</b> ought to be able to make a living developing it.
<br> <br>
And then theres ADOBE</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; ... I support the idea that a bunch of extremely talented software engineers ought to be able to make a living developing it .
And then theres ADOBE</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; ... I support the idea that a bunch of extremely talented software engineers ought to be able to make a living developing it.
And then theres ADOBE</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601012</id>
	<title>One damn tool - pay for 200 unnecessary ones</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1269458220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>isnt the way with the software companies these days ? fill a software with innumerable features even professionals will rarely use, and ask $60-100 for 20 to 30 functions/features that people will use, because you also put there 180 or so ones that noone will use.</p><p>that's why software is being pirated. noone wants to shell out $60 for 200 functions 20 of which they will use from time to time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>isnt the way with the software companies these days ?
fill a software with innumerable features even professionals will rarely use , and ask $ 60-100 for 20 to 30 functions/features that people will use , because you also put there 180 or so ones that noone will use.that 's why software is being pirated .
noone wants to shell out $ 60 for 200 functions 20 of which they will use from time to time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>isnt the way with the software companies these days ?
fill a software with innumerable features even professionals will rarely use, and ask $60-100 for 20 to 30 functions/features that people will use, because you also put there 180 or so ones that noone will use.that's why software is being pirated.
noone wants to shell out $60 for 200 functions 20 of which they will use from time to time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603378</id>
	<title>Enhance</title>
	<author>AlpineR</author>
	<datestamp>1269424020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/02/ff\_algorithm/all/1" title="wired.com">Fill in the Blanks: Using Math to Turn Lo-Res Datasets into Hi-Res Samples</a> [wired.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fill in the Blanks : Using Math to Turn Lo-Res Datasets into Hi-Res Samples [ wired.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fill in the Blanks: Using Math to Turn Lo-Res Datasets into Hi-Res Samples [wired.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602348</id>
	<title>Re:Damn.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269463200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Godwins Law already?  Jeez...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Godwins Law already ?
Jeez.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Godwins Law already?
Jeez...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603690</id>
	<title>Re:Damn.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269425340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So would Hitler, especially the part where the guy "removed a couple of "million" Poles."</p><p>Fixed it for you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So would Hitler , especially the part where the guy " removed a couple of " million " Poles .
" Fixed it for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So would Hitler, especially the part where the guy "removed a couple of "million" Poles.
"Fixed it for you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601160</id>
	<title>Yes, Virginia, it is an ad.</title>
	<author>cgoodric</author>
	<datestamp>1269458700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So easy, a CAVE man could do it. Oh, wait, what?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So easy , a CAVE man could do it .
Oh , wait , what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So easy, a CAVE man could do it.
Oh, wait, what?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602052</id>
	<title>Re:I'm convinced!</title>
	<author>oldspewey</author>
	<datestamp>1269462060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How many photos would I have to edit to make that cost effective?</p></div><p>How much do your clients typically pay you for an average sized design job? The answer to your question could be anywhere between 1 and 100.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How many photos would I have to edit to make that cost effective ? How much do your clients typically pay you for an average sized design job ?
The answer to your question could be anywhere between 1 and 100 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many photos would I have to edit to make that cost effective?How much do your clients typically pay you for an average sized design job?
The answer to your question could be anywhere between 1 and 100.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601240</id>
	<title>Re:The most important question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269459000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Inside or outside?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Inside or outside ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Inside or outside?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600892</id>
	<title>Re:I'm convinced!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269457800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hasn't it always been like $700? That means it's always been an expensive pro tool. And because of inflation, the relative price has actually gone down gradually over the past couple decades!</p><p>dom</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has n't it always been like $ 700 ?
That means it 's always been an expensive pro tool .
And because of inflation , the relative price has actually gone down gradually over the past couple decades ! dom</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hasn't it always been like $700?
That means it's always been an expensive pro tool.
And because of inflation, the relative price has actually gone down gradually over the past couple decades!dom</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604698</id>
	<title>Not impressed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269429660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been doing professional level photo retouching for almost 11 years.  Although this looks like just a better version of the healing tool/Patch Tool with a new flashy name, you can still even in the small crappy video see blurred circles left behind on the edges of the grass and shadows.  Tree removal?  Looks ok on a 480p, 3 inch wide video - print that image 20x30 and let me see how seamless and unnoticeable that removal is.</p><p>I like the direction it's going - although I highly doubt it's there yet...and it really wouldn't have taken that long to remove that tree manually using perfected techniques or the poles/shadows for that matter.  How does it look removing a gouge/scratch from someones plaid shirt in a photo restoration?  My guess would be - not so good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been doing professional level photo retouching for almost 11 years .
Although this looks like just a better version of the healing tool/Patch Tool with a new flashy name , you can still even in the small crappy video see blurred circles left behind on the edges of the grass and shadows .
Tree removal ?
Looks ok on a 480p , 3 inch wide video - print that image 20x30 and let me see how seamless and unnoticeable that removal is.I like the direction it 's going - although I highly doubt it 's there yet...and it really would n't have taken that long to remove that tree manually using perfected techniques or the poles/shadows for that matter .
How does it look removing a gouge/scratch from someones plaid shirt in a photo restoration ?
My guess would be - not so good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been doing professional level photo retouching for almost 11 years.
Although this looks like just a better version of the healing tool/Patch Tool with a new flashy name, you can still even in the small crappy video see blurred circles left behind on the edges of the grass and shadows.
Tree removal?
Looks ok on a 480p, 3 inch wide video - print that image 20x30 and let me see how seamless and unnoticeable that removal is.I like the direction it's going - although I highly doubt it's there yet...and it really wouldn't have taken that long to remove that tree manually using perfected techniques or the poles/shadows for that matter.
How does it look removing a gouge/scratch from someones plaid shirt in a photo restoration?
My guess would be - not so good.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31607188</id>
	<title>Obvious hoax is obvious</title>
	<author>millennial</author>
	<datestamp>1269450300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bit early for April Fool's Day, but the last image proves it. There is no way in hell that any program would take the upward curve of the hill in the lower-right background and turn it into a DOWNWARD curve. That's something that you could only possibly know to do if you had an original image where the hill curved downward. Not to mention all the cloud detail that simply does not exist anywhere in the panorama.</p><p>Clearly all they've done is *added* a bunch of things to images (or in the case of the 'panorama', just deleted part of it to fake a panorama), then "used the tool" to "remove" them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bit early for April Fool 's Day , but the last image proves it .
There is no way in hell that any program would take the upward curve of the hill in the lower-right background and turn it into a DOWNWARD curve .
That 's something that you could only possibly know to do if you had an original image where the hill curved downward .
Not to mention all the cloud detail that simply does not exist anywhere in the panorama.Clearly all they 've done is * added * a bunch of things to images ( or in the case of the 'panorama ' , just deleted part of it to fake a panorama ) , then " used the tool " to " remove " them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bit early for April Fool's Day, but the last image proves it.
There is no way in hell that any program would take the upward curve of the hill in the lower-right background and turn it into a DOWNWARD curve.
That's something that you could only possibly know to do if you had an original image where the hill curved downward.
Not to mention all the cloud detail that simply does not exist anywhere in the panorama.Clearly all they've done is *added* a bunch of things to images (or in the case of the 'panorama', just deleted part of it to fake a panorama), then "used the tool" to "remove" them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600756</id>
	<title>Ex Wife feature</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269457140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ex wife, there you go</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ex wife , there you go</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ex wife, there you go</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602096</id>
	<title>Re:Damn.....</title>
	<author>Low Ranked Craig</author>
	<datestamp>1269462240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not sure why this is modded funny.  It's true.  And so would the CIA, Homeland Security, most police departments, the current president, the prior president, etc.  In other words, just about anybody in a position of authority in any government wants this, not to mention corporations, unions and Mrs. Kravitz across the street...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not sure why this is modded funny .
It 's true .
And so would the CIA , Homeland Security , most police departments , the current president , the prior president , etc .
In other words , just about anybody in a position of authority in any government wants this , not to mention corporations , unions and Mrs. Kravitz across the street.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not sure why this is modded funny.
It's true.
And so would the CIA, Homeland Security, most police departments, the current president, the prior president, etc.
In other words, just about anybody in a position of authority in any government wants this, not to mention corporations, unions and Mrs. Kravitz across the street...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600548</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600672
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31606888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31621112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601936
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31617758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600546
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603378
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31606426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600546
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601976
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600922
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31647622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604270
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600546
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31607020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601842
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603874
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604480
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605160
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601736
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602160
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603776
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605752
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31606188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31606282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600892
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601294
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31609350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603528
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1725246_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31607626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600570
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601438
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602034
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600676
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603776
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600876
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601048
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602306
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604372
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603318
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601222
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601074
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601258
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600994
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31621112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601294
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601216
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600884
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600546
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601880
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602546
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601214
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601554
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31606888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602222
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604704
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601548
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31607626
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600696
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601842
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601624
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601686
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601894
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31606426
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601502
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600860
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604596
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601446
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600744
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31647622
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602456
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603016
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601244
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604480
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602586
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600750
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600922
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601232
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602270
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604050
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31606188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605752
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601370
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601430
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601012
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601326
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31607020
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603874
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601514
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602528
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31617758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602160
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31609350
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31600548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602096
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31605288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601054
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603690
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31604270
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602348
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602652
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31606282
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31603310
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1725246.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31601342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1725246.31602314
</commentlist>
</conversation>
