<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_24_1539220</id>
	<title>Sprint Unveils HTC Evo 4G Super Phone</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1269450000000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>adeelarshad82 writes <i>"Sprint dropped a bombshell on the CTIA Wireless trade show by unveiling the most powerful Google Android smartphone ever seen in the USA, <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2361729,00.asp">the WiMAX-powered Evo 4G</a>. The phone runs Android 2.1 on a 1-GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon QSD8650 chipset along with a helpful 1GB of built-in memory and 512MB of RAM, which is assisted by a MicroSD slot supporting up to 32GB cards. It swaps between EVDO Rev. A, WiMAX and Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g on demand. The phone is dominated by a 4.3-inch, 800-by-480 65,000-color TFT LCD capacitive touch screen. There's an 8-megapixel camera on the back and a 1.3-megapixel unit on the front. The camera also records 720p, high-def video, which it can play through an HDMI out jack on the bottom. The Evo 4G weighs 170g and measures 120.5 mm by 67 mm by 13 mm. It's expected to hit the market in the summer."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>adeelarshad82 writes " Sprint dropped a bombshell on the CTIA Wireless trade show by unveiling the most powerful Google Android smartphone ever seen in the USA , the WiMAX-powered Evo 4G .
The phone runs Android 2.1 on a 1-GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon QSD8650 chipset along with a helpful 1GB of built-in memory and 512MB of RAM , which is assisted by a MicroSD slot supporting up to 32GB cards .
It swaps between EVDO Rev .
A , WiMAX and Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g on demand .
The phone is dominated by a 4.3-inch , 800-by-480 65,000-color TFT LCD capacitive touch screen .
There 's an 8-megapixel camera on the back and a 1.3-megapixel unit on the front .
The camera also records 720p , high-def video , which it can play through an HDMI out jack on the bottom .
The Evo 4G weighs 170g and measures 120.5 mm by 67 mm by 13 mm .
It 's expected to hit the market in the summer .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>adeelarshad82 writes "Sprint dropped a bombshell on the CTIA Wireless trade show by unveiling the most powerful Google Android smartphone ever seen in the USA, the WiMAX-powered Evo 4G.
The phone runs Android 2.1 on a 1-GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon QSD8650 chipset along with a helpful 1GB of built-in memory and 512MB of RAM, which is assisted by a MicroSD slot supporting up to 32GB cards.
It swaps between EVDO Rev.
A, WiMAX and Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g on demand.
The phone is dominated by a 4.3-inch, 800-by-480 65,000-color TFT LCD capacitive touch screen.
There's an 8-megapixel camera on the back and a 1.3-megapixel unit on the front.
The camera also records 720p, high-def video, which it can play through an HDMI out jack on the bottom.
The Evo 4G weighs 170g and measures 120.5 mm by 67 mm by 13 mm.
It's expected to hit the market in the summer.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601822</id>
	<title>Re:The *best* feature:</title>
	<author>hhawk</author>
	<datestamp>1269461220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The phone plus my netbook, when traveling will be great, I don't have to worry about bad broadband in hotels or hotels that want to charge $10 a night for Broadband.</p><p>Then at home, like last week when we lost power for 55 hours.. I could have some shot at some net-access during the outage.. I usually keep a few extra batteries around.. I know I wouldn't get 55 hour of access but with 2 extra batteries if I could get 3+ hours that would be great.</p><p>I could also use it out in the yard the same way and not worry about where WIFI reaches and doesn't reach..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The phone plus my netbook , when traveling will be great , I do n't have to worry about bad broadband in hotels or hotels that want to charge $ 10 a night for Broadband.Then at home , like last week when we lost power for 55 hours.. I could have some shot at some net-access during the outage.. I usually keep a few extra batteries around.. I know I would n't get 55 hour of access but with 2 extra batteries if I could get 3 + hours that would be great.I could also use it out in the yard the same way and not worry about where WIFI reaches and does n't reach. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The phone plus my netbook, when traveling will be great, I don't have to worry about bad broadband in hotels or hotels that want to charge $10 a night for Broadband.Then at home, like last week when we lost power for 55 hours.. I could have some shot at some net-access during the outage.. I usually keep a few extra batteries around.. I know I wouldn't get 55 hour of access but with 2 extra batteries if I could get 3+ hours that would be great.I could also use it out in the yard the same way and not worry about where WIFI reaches and doesn't reach..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603152</id>
	<title>Re:This. Is. Wrong.</title>
	<author>owlstead</author>
	<datestamp>1269423240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"OK, so this phone has more jam then my wife's and I's two celeron laptops, and is just about as powerful as my Sempron desktop. Why have a computer?"</p><p>Full sized keyboard and monitor? 3D graphics card? The idea that you can receive messages while doing something different with your computer?</p><p>If it supports 1920x1080 of course, you could simply buy a HDTV, a BlueTooth keyboard and use Google docs (for mundane tasks). So you could do a lot of things without buying a PC.</p><p>Flash probably won't work correctly because it never does, unless you use Windows XP or higher.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" OK , so this phone has more jam then my wife 's and I 's two celeron laptops , and is just about as powerful as my Sempron desktop .
Why have a computer ?
" Full sized keyboard and monitor ?
3D graphics card ?
The idea that you can receive messages while doing something different with your computer ? If it supports 1920x1080 of course , you could simply buy a HDTV , a BlueTooth keyboard and use Google docs ( for mundane tasks ) .
So you could do a lot of things without buying a PC.Flash probably wo n't work correctly because it never does , unless you use Windows XP or higher .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"OK, so this phone has more jam then my wife's and I's two celeron laptops, and is just about as powerful as my Sempron desktop.
Why have a computer?
"Full sized keyboard and monitor?
3D graphics card?
The idea that you can receive messages while doing something different with your computer?If it supports 1920x1080 of course, you could simply buy a HDTV, a BlueTooth keyboard and use Google docs (for mundane tasks).
So you could do a lot of things without buying a PC.Flash probably won't work correctly because it never does, unless you use Windows XP or higher.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601136</id>
	<title>Re:It's a TELEPHONE</title>
	<author>talz13</author>
	<datestamp>1269458640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because, usually, the camera is on the opposite side of the phone from the screen.  This is one of the few devices we'll have gotten over here that has both regular camera and front facing camera.

I remember one old phone that had a camera that you could rotate back and forth (maybe some old samsung?), and then there was the unlocked GSM Touch Pro that had a front facing camera, but it's definitely not a COMMON feature over here yet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because , usually , the camera is on the opposite side of the phone from the screen .
This is one of the few devices we 'll have gotten over here that has both regular camera and front facing camera .
I remember one old phone that had a camera that you could rotate back and forth ( maybe some old samsung ?
) , and then there was the unlocked GSM Touch Pro that had a front facing camera , but it 's definitely not a COMMON feature over here yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because, usually, the camera is on the opposite side of the phone from the screen.
This is one of the few devices we'll have gotten over here that has both regular camera and front facing camera.
I remember one old phone that had a camera that you could rotate back and forth (maybe some old samsung?
), and then there was the unlocked GSM Touch Pro that had a front facing camera, but it's definitely not a COMMON feature over here yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601226</id>
	<title>Re:The *best* feature:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269458940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Enjoy your 5GB monthly invisible cap that you'll hit in an hour with 4 teens surfing mytubebook and listening to lasdoralip.fm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Enjoy your 5GB monthly invisible cap that you 'll hit in an hour with 4 teens surfing mytubebook and listening to lasdoralip.fm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Enjoy your 5GB monthly invisible cap that you'll hit in an hour with 4 teens surfing mytubebook and listening to lasdoralip.fm.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601442</id>
	<title>but...</title>
	<author>i\_ate\_god</author>
	<datestamp>1269459720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will it support 3G bands or just 4G?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it support 3G bands or just 4G ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it support 3G bands or just 4G?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600242</id>
	<title>Re:HDMI jack?</title>
	<author>Isaac-Lew</author>
	<datestamp>1269455220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a Samsung Instinct HD on Sprint. You can copy videos to/from the phone &amp; play them (on the phone or on an HD display) without any restrictions that I can see.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a Samsung Instinct HD on Sprint .
You can copy videos to/from the phone &amp; play them ( on the phone or on an HD display ) without any restrictions that I can see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a Samsung Instinct HD on Sprint.
You can copy videos to/from the phone &amp; play them (on the phone or on an HD display) without any restrictions that I can see.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600864</id>
	<title>Fuck Everything, We're Doing 5G</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269457620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would someone tell me how this happened? We were the fucking vanguard of wireless in this country. The iPhone 3G was the phone to own. Then the other guy came out with the HTC Hero. Were we scared? Hell, no. Because we hit back with a little thing called the iPhone 3Gs.  That's 3G speeds and a fucking compass. For orienteering. But you know what happened next? Shut up, I'm telling you what happened--the bastards went to 4G. Now we're standing around with our cocks in our hands, selling the 3G and a fucking compass. Orienteering or no, suddenly we're the chumps. Well, fuck it. We're going to 5G.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would someone tell me how this happened ?
We were the fucking vanguard of wireless in this country .
The iPhone 3G was the phone to own .
Then the other guy came out with the HTC Hero .
Were we scared ?
Hell , no .
Because we hit back with a little thing called the iPhone 3Gs .
That 's 3G speeds and a fucking compass .
For orienteering .
But you know what happened next ?
Shut up , I 'm telling you what happened--the bastards went to 4G .
Now we 're standing around with our cocks in our hands , selling the 3G and a fucking compass .
Orienteering or no , suddenly we 're the chumps .
Well , fuck it .
We 're going to 5G .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would someone tell me how this happened?
We were the fucking vanguard of wireless in this country.
The iPhone 3G was the phone to own.
Then the other guy came out with the HTC Hero.
Were we scared?
Hell, no.
Because we hit back with a little thing called the iPhone 3Gs.
That's 3G speeds and a fucking compass.
For orienteering.
But you know what happened next?
Shut up, I'm telling you what happened--the bastards went to 4G.
Now we're standing around with our cocks in our hands, selling the 3G and a fucking compass.
Orienteering or no, suddenly we're the chumps.
Well, fuck it.
We're going to 5G.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602382</id>
	<title>Re:Super Phone? Aw, come on.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269463320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yea but.. there are many reasons why we aren't calling Dell's latest machines "super computers"....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea but.. there are many reasons why we are n't calling Dell 's latest machines " super computers " ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea but.. there are many reasons why we aren't calling Dell's latest machines "super computers"....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600240</id>
	<title>Re:It's a TELEPHONE</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269455220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Plenty of geeks have no interest in gadgets or uninteresting webcomics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Plenty of geeks have no interest in gadgets or uninteresting webcomics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Plenty of geeks have no interest in gadgets or uninteresting webcomics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603110</id>
	<title>Re:Voice?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269423060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since when do we consider EVDO Rev A or WiMAX '4G'... I thought LTE was to be Sprint's 4G network.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since when do we consider EVDO Rev A or WiMAX '4G'... I thought LTE was to be Sprint 's 4G network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since when do we consider EVDO Rev A or WiMAX '4G'... I thought LTE was to be Sprint's 4G network.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600464</id>
	<title>Re:The *best* feature:</title>
	<author>Jeng</author>
	<datestamp>1269456180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And with an HDMI port to boot.  Could be the lowest power and smallest home theater device.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And with an HDMI port to boot .
Could be the lowest power and smallest home theater device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And with an HDMI port to boot.
Could be the lowest power and smallest home theater device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602120</id>
	<title>Re:Two very important points missing:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269462300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Android with the sense ui is already a proven interface design that is very popular. The Nexus one, a very comparable phone, is priced at $200 subsidized by t-mobile, a reasonable price for a premium smartphone that can only go down.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Android with the sense ui is already a proven interface design that is very popular .
The Nexus one , a very comparable phone , is priced at $ 200 subsidized by t-mobile , a reasonable price for a premium smartphone that can only go down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Android with the sense ui is already a proven interface design that is very popular.
The Nexus one, a very comparable phone, is priced at $200 subsidized by t-mobile, a reasonable price for a premium smartphone that can only go down.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601392</id>
	<title>Re:Also..</title>
	<author>Voltageaav</author>
	<datestamp>1269459540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/htc-evo-4g-nexus-one-and-droid-face-off-on-the-charted-field-o/" title="engadget.com">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/htc-evo-4g-nexus-one-and-droid-face-off-on-the-charted-field-o/</a> [engadget.com]  It has multitouch and a bigger battery than Droid &amp; Nexus one, but that doesn't tell how long the actual life will be.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/htc-evo-4g-nexus-one-and-droid-face-off-on-the-charted-field-o/ [ engadget.com ] It has multitouch and a bigger battery than Droid &amp; Nexus one , but that does n't tell how long the actual life will be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/htc-evo-4g-nexus-one-and-droid-face-off-on-the-charted-field-o/ [engadget.com]  It has multitouch and a bigger battery than Droid &amp; Nexus one, but that doesn't tell how long the actual life will be.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600450</id>
	<title>what about the battery?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269456060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I heard that many of the new android based phones last less than couple hours. I am curious how much time you can use/keep it in stand by keeping in mind that has a nicer cpu/screen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard that many of the new android based phones last less than couple hours .
I am curious how much time you can use/keep it in stand by keeping in mind that has a nicer cpu/screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard that many of the new android based phones last less than couple hours.
I am curious how much time you can use/keep it in stand by keeping in mind that has a nicer cpu/screen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600724</id>
	<title>Front Camera nice</title>
	<author>Nukenbar</author>
	<datestamp>1269457020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is nice to see phones that are adding front cameras.  Asian phones have had this for years allowing for video chatting with the handset.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is nice to see phones that are adding front cameras .
Asian phones have had this for years allowing for video chatting with the handset .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is nice to see phones that are adding front cameras.
Asian phones have had this for years allowing for video chatting with the handset.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600382</id>
	<title>Re:It's a TELEPHONE</title>
	<author>The Dancing Panda</author>
	<datestamp>1269455880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sir, that hasn't been the primary purpose of these machines for years.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sir , that has n't been the primary purpose of these machines for years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sir, that hasn't been the primary purpose of these machines for years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860</id>
	<title>HDMI jack?</title>
	<author>Anonymusing</author>
	<datestamp>1269453960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A phone that records 720p video and plays it out via an HDMI jack?  WHY?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A phone that records 720p video and plays it out via an HDMI jack ?
WHY ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A phone that records 720p video and plays it out via an HDMI jack?
WHY?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600566</id>
	<title>Re:Game Changer!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269456480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it also an iPhone killer?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it also an iPhone killer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it also an iPhone killer?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603056</id>
	<title>Re:Two very important points missing:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269422820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does either of those 2 things matter?
<br>
<br>
iPhone set the standard that devices can be, a. expensive, and b. have a battery life of less than 6hrs in order to be <i>innovative</i>. And they have <b>not</b> "improved" on those 2 things since the <b>gen 1</b> iPhone day one.
<br>
iPad confirms that notion and I doubt we'll see anything over 8 hours on that brick. As for this device, I see about 8hrs as well. iPhone set the standard for those 2 criteria, and the consumer accepted--though pricing has gotten better (Android devices for $49, iPhone 3G at $99) we are now stuck for at least 2 more generations of phones before battery life gets extended.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does either of those 2 things matter ?
iPhone set the standard that devices can be , a. expensive , and b. have a battery life of less than 6hrs in order to be innovative .
And they have not " improved " on those 2 things since the gen 1 iPhone day one .
iPad confirms that notion and I doubt we 'll see anything over 8 hours on that brick .
As for this device , I see about 8hrs as well .
iPhone set the standard for those 2 criteria , and the consumer accepted--though pricing has gotten better ( Android devices for $ 49 , iPhone 3G at $ 99 ) we are now stuck for at least 2 more generations of phones before battery life gets extended .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does either of those 2 things matter?
iPhone set the standard that devices can be, a. expensive, and b. have a battery life of less than 6hrs in order to be innovative.
And they have not "improved" on those 2 things since the gen 1 iPhone day one.
iPad confirms that notion and I doubt we'll see anything over 8 hours on that brick.
As for this device, I see about 8hrs as well.
iPhone set the standard for those 2 criteria, and the consumer accepted--though pricing has gotten better (Android devices for $49, iPhone 3G at $99) we are now stuck for at least 2 more generations of phones before battery life gets extended.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599964</id>
	<title>Re:HDMI jack?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269454260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599884</id>
	<title>Battery life?</title>
	<author>WiiVault</author>
	<datestamp>1269454020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looks really cool and feature packed, but I wonder if it will last a resonable amount of time on a single charge? If you ask me only in the last year or so have 3G radios become efficient enough to be usefull daylong in something like a phone. If WiMax/"4G" is like early 3G headsets it will likely last an unreasonably short amount of time on a charge. But hey if I'm wrong sign me up!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks really cool and feature packed , but I wonder if it will last a resonable amount of time on a single charge ?
If you ask me only in the last year or so have 3G radios become efficient enough to be usefull daylong in something like a phone .
If WiMax/ " 4G " is like early 3G headsets it will likely last an unreasonably short amount of time on a charge .
But hey if I 'm wrong sign me up !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks really cool and feature packed, but I wonder if it will last a resonable amount of time on a single charge?
If you ask me only in the last year or so have 3G radios become efficient enough to be usefull daylong in something like a phone.
If WiMax/"4G" is like early 3G headsets it will likely last an unreasonably short amount of time on a charge.
But hey if I'm wrong sign me up!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600114</id>
	<title>Well...</title>
	<author>CSHARP123</author>
	<datestamp>1269454740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Everybody questioning about its battery life in here, listen, we have provided a mobile battery charger just keep <a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/07/need-more-juice-for-your-aa-battery-shake-shake-shake.php" title="treehugger.com">  shaking </a> [treehugger.com] it will charge.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Everybody questioning about its battery life in here , listen , we have provided a mobile battery charger just keep shaking [ treehugger.com ] it will charge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everybody questioning about its battery life in here, listen, we have provided a mobile battery charger just keep   shaking  [treehugger.com] it will charge.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600482</id>
	<title>Re:Game Changer!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269456240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Getting away from CDMA like the majority of the world and their competition would be a game changer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Getting away from CDMA like the majority of the world and their competition would be a game changer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Getting away from CDMA like the majority of the world and their competition would be a game changer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599904</id>
	<title>4G only</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269454080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>4G only means it will not work at all on the majority of the existing network.<br>Still neat if you are on a part of the network that will support the video calls/wave of the future.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>4G only means it will not work at all on the majority of the existing network.Still neat if you are on a part of the network that will support the video calls/wave of the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4G only means it will not work at all on the majority of the existing network.Still neat if you are on a part of the network that will support the video calls/wave of the future.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599984</id>
	<title>Also..</title>
	<author>AnotherShep</author>
	<datestamp>1269454320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The expected battery life is 20 minutes of standby or 5 minutes of talk.  A replacement high-capacity battery adds 104g to the weight of the unit, 20mm to the depth, and extends standby time to 68 minutes and talk time to over 10 minutes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The expected battery life is 20 minutes of standby or 5 minutes of talk .
A replacement high-capacity battery adds 104g to the weight of the unit , 20mm to the depth , and extends standby time to 68 minutes and talk time to over 10 minutes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The expected battery life is 20 minutes of standby or 5 minutes of talk.
A replacement high-capacity battery adds 104g to the weight of the unit, 20mm to the depth, and extends standby time to 68 minutes and talk time to over 10 minutes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600270</id>
	<title>Re:It's a TELEPHONE</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269455340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>silly, no one talks on the phone anymore. you use a telephone to read email, twitter, facebook and the rest of the internets</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>silly , no one talks on the phone anymore .
you use a telephone to read email , twitter , facebook and the rest of the internets</tokentext>
<sentencetext>silly, no one talks on the phone anymore.
you use a telephone to read email, twitter, facebook and the rest of the internets</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602994</id>
	<title>Re:No hardware keyboard...</title>
	<author>owlstead</author>
	<datestamp>1269422520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've got a HTC Hero with capacitive screen (as this one will have) and it is very nice to type short messages on, especially when the automatic correction can be used (e.g. internet URL's, mail addresses and CLI are a bit harder). I imagine that with a much larger screen the keyboard will be even better. You can use the trackball to precisely position the cursor. The only thing is that there is only a single, expensive stylus you can buy, and I don't see how you can use that for pixel precise input.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've got a HTC Hero with capacitive screen ( as this one will have ) and it is very nice to type short messages on , especially when the automatic correction can be used ( e.g .
internet URL 's , mail addresses and CLI are a bit harder ) .
I imagine that with a much larger screen the keyboard will be even better .
You can use the trackball to precisely position the cursor .
The only thing is that there is only a single , expensive stylus you can buy , and I do n't see how you can use that for pixel precise input .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've got a HTC Hero with capacitive screen (as this one will have) and it is very nice to type short messages on, especially when the automatic correction can be used (e.g.
internet URL's, mail addresses and CLI are a bit harder).
I imagine that with a much larger screen the keyboard will be even better.
You can use the trackball to precisely position the cursor.
The only thing is that there is only a single, expensive stylus you can buy, and I don't see how you can use that for pixel precise input.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603720</id>
	<title>Re:Eh</title>
	<author>Tumbleweed</author>
	<datestamp>1269425460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Slower than a Cray. Less storage than a ZFS SAN. Lame.</i></p><p>But it's got a kickstand! (seriously, it has a kickstand)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slower than a Cray .
Less storage than a ZFS SAN .
Lame.But it 's got a kickstand !
( seriously , it has a kickstand )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slower than a Cray.
Less storage than a ZFS SAN.
Lame.But it's got a kickstand!
(seriously, it has a kickstand)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601670</id>
	<title>The important coverage info</title>
	<author>DiademBedfordshire</author>
	<datestamp>1269460620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here is the coverage info for their 4G service.</p><p><a href="http://www.nextel.com/en/stores/popups/4G\_coverage\_popup.shtml" title="nextel.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nextel.com/en/stores/popups/4G\_coverage\_popup.shtml</a> [nextel.com]</p><p>Thankfully I live near Baltimore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is the coverage info for their 4G service.http : //www.nextel.com/en/stores/popups/4G \ _coverage \ _popup.shtml [ nextel.com ] Thankfully I live near Baltimore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is the coverage info for their 4G service.http://www.nextel.com/en/stores/popups/4G\_coverage\_popup.shtml [nextel.com]Thankfully I live near Baltimore.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599812</id>
	<title>YAY!</title>
	<author>Em Emalb</author>
	<datestamp>1269453780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More advertising on slashdot!  Wohoo!</p><p>-1 Troll, +1 Truth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More advertising on slashdot !
Wohoo ! -1 Troll , + 1 Truth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More advertising on slashdot!
Wohoo!-1 Troll, +1 Truth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600662</id>
	<title>Re:Eh</title>
	<author>NekSnappa</author>
	<datestamp>1269456780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry I burned all my mod points yesterday. Then I could undo that -1 Troll that was laid on you.<br>
Obviously someone who doesn't understand the meme has mod points today.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry I burned all my mod points yesterday .
Then I could undo that -1 Troll that was laid on you .
Obviously someone who does n't understand the meme has mod points today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry I burned all my mod points yesterday.
Then I could undo that -1 Troll that was laid on you.
Obviously someone who doesn't understand the meme has mod points today.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600294</id>
	<title>can you install more than 5 apps to it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269455460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>there is more to a smart phone than email and constant searches on Google. Iphone ships with local storage and a nice SDK. Android would be a lot better if Google hadn't crippled the app capability so you are forced to do everything online</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>there is more to a smart phone than email and constant searches on Google .
Iphone ships with local storage and a nice SDK .
Android would be a lot better if Google had n't crippled the app capability so you are forced to do everything online</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there is more to a smart phone than email and constant searches on Google.
Iphone ships with local storage and a nice SDK.
Android would be a lot better if Google hadn't crippled the app capability so you are forced to do everything online</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602856</id>
	<title>Can you...</title>
	<author>skudenfaugen</author>
	<datestamp>1269422100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... imagine a Beowulf cluster of these?</htmltext>
<tokenext>... imagine a Beowulf cluster of these ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... imagine a Beowulf cluster of these?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600346</id>
	<title>Re:HDMI jack?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269455640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Er. HDMI is just a more robust connector for DVI bundled with digital audio. It's just a way to connect digital video sources to screens. You're thinking of the abomination that is HDCP.</p><p>You know what? A built in HDMI socket sure beats Apple's proprietary docking connector and eye wateringly expensive component video leads.</p><p>Besides, I expect that if you want to get your videos off this device you could use USB or Bluetooth, or memory card reader or even run an FTP server and pull them over WiFi.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Er .
HDMI is just a more robust connector for DVI bundled with digital audio .
It 's just a way to connect digital video sources to screens .
You 're thinking of the abomination that is HDCP.You know what ?
A built in HDMI socket sure beats Apple 's proprietary docking connector and eye wateringly expensive component video leads.Besides , I expect that if you want to get your videos off this device you could use USB or Bluetooth , or memory card reader or even run an FTP server and pull them over WiFi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Er.
HDMI is just a more robust connector for DVI bundled with digital audio.
It's just a way to connect digital video sources to screens.
You're thinking of the abomination that is HDCP.You know what?
A built in HDMI socket sure beats Apple's proprietary docking connector and eye wateringly expensive component video leads.Besides, I expect that if you want to get your videos off this device you could use USB or Bluetooth, or memory card reader or even run an FTP server and pull them over WiFi.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600066</id>
	<title>Two very important points missing:</title>
	<author>jandrese</author>
	<datestamp>1269454620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>1. What is the battery life.<br>
2. What is the price.  <br>
<br>
I'm slightly concerned that this will be like those Japanese or European phones that have a huge laundry list of features, but skimp out on basic usability and essentials like good radio paths and battery life; plus half of the features don't work properly (camera has a lot of pixels, but a worthless lens; screen is dim or difficult to read; interface requires 15 button presses to do anything; front camera can't be used for teleconferencing because the carrier disabled that feature, etc...).  There's a definite concern that this will be priced at the "enthusiast" level as well, meaning almost nobody can afford it or the plan required to drive it.  <br>
<br>
The ball is in your court Sprint.  What are you going to do with it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
What is the battery life .
2. What is the price .
I 'm slightly concerned that this will be like those Japanese or European phones that have a huge laundry list of features , but skimp out on basic usability and essentials like good radio paths and battery life ; plus half of the features do n't work properly ( camera has a lot of pixels , but a worthless lens ; screen is dim or difficult to read ; interface requires 15 button presses to do anything ; front camera ca n't be used for teleconferencing because the carrier disabled that feature , etc... ) .
There 's a definite concern that this will be priced at the " enthusiast " level as well , meaning almost nobody can afford it or the plan required to drive it .
The ball is in your court Sprint .
What are you going to do with it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
What is the battery life.
2. What is the price.
I'm slightly concerned that this will be like those Japanese or European phones that have a huge laundry list of features, but skimp out on basic usability and essentials like good radio paths and battery life; plus half of the features don't work properly (camera has a lot of pixels, but a worthless lens; screen is dim or difficult to read; interface requires 15 button presses to do anything; front camera can't be used for teleconferencing because the carrier disabled that feature, etc...).
There's a definite concern that this will be priced at the "enthusiast" level as well, meaning almost nobody can afford it or the plan required to drive it.
The ball is in your court Sprint.
What are you going to do with it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602198</id>
	<title>Re:It's a TELEPHONE</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1269462600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Uh, we do?  My last two phones have supported video calling.  It costs the same as a voice call on the same network, but 50p/minute for other networks.  I've never actually used it, because it's a terrible idea.  It removes the portable aspect of your phone, by forcing you to look at the phone while you use it.  That's not a problem while you're at home, but in that case just use any of the videoconferencing apps that are available; most modern IM platforms support it out of the box.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Uh , we do ?
My last two phones have supported video calling .
It costs the same as a voice call on the same network , but 50p/minute for other networks .
I 've never actually used it , because it 's a terrible idea .
It removes the portable aspect of your phone , by forcing you to look at the phone while you use it .
That 's not a problem while you 're at home , but in that case just use any of the videoconferencing apps that are available ; most modern IM platforms support it out of the box .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uh, we do?
My last two phones have supported video calling.
It costs the same as a voice call on the same network, but 50p/minute for other networks.
I've never actually used it, because it's a terrible idea.
It removes the portable aspect of your phone, by forcing you to look at the phone while you use it.
That's not a problem while you're at home, but in that case just use any of the videoconferencing apps that are available; most modern IM platforms support it out of the box.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600510</id>
	<title>+1 for the tag of 'holy shit'</title>
	<author>carlcmc</author>
	<datestamp>1269456300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I chuckled when I saw someone had added that tag. That was my reaction too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I chuckled when I saw someone had added that tag .
That was my reaction too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I chuckled when I saw someone had added that tag.
That was my reaction too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31615328</id>
	<title>Re:Also..</title>
	<author>GreenCha</author>
	<datestamp>1269546900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The expected battery life is 20 minutes of standby or 5 minutes of talk.  A replacement high-capacity battery adds 104g to the weight of the unit, 20mm to the depth, and extends standby time to 68 minutes and talk time to over 10 minutes.</p></div><p>Are you serious?! Is this what HTC or Sprint released numbers or it's your estimate?  I assume these values are measured when WiMax modem is on?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The expected battery life is 20 minutes of standby or 5 minutes of talk .
A replacement high-capacity battery adds 104g to the weight of the unit , 20mm to the depth , and extends standby time to 68 minutes and talk time to over 10 minutes.Are you serious ? !
Is this what HTC or Sprint released numbers or it 's your estimate ?
I assume these values are measured when WiMax modem is on ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The expected battery life is 20 minutes of standby or 5 minutes of talk.
A replacement high-capacity battery adds 104g to the weight of the unit, 20mm to the depth, and extends standby time to 68 minutes and talk time to over 10 minutes.Are you serious?!
Is this what HTC or Sprint released numbers or it's your estimate?
I assume these values are measured when WiMax modem is on?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601152</id>
	<title>Re:Wow.</title>
	<author>PGillingwater</author>
	<datestamp>1269458640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Coffee?  Clearly you want the <a href="http://www.pomegranatephone.com/" title="pomegranatephone.com">Pomegranate.</a> [pomegranatephone.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Coffee ?
Clearly you want the Pomegranate .
[ pomegranatephone.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Coffee?
Clearly you want the Pomegranate.
[pomegranatephone.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31607382</id>
	<title>Re:HDMI jack?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269454200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>uhm dude, you don't have to use hdcp<br>and it is trivial to hack around.<br>this is like complaining about dvi having too many pins</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>uhm dude , you do n't have to use hdcpand it is trivial to hack around.this is like complaining about dvi having too many pins</tokentext>
<sentencetext>uhm dude, you don't have to use hdcpand it is trivial to hack around.this is like complaining about dvi having too many pins</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600000</id>
	<title>Game Changer!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269454380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>to put it simply, it's a game changer for Sprint.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>to put it simply , it 's a game changer for Sprint .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to put it simply, it's a game changer for Sprint.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600160</id>
	<title>Re:HDMI jack?</title>
	<author>h4rr4r</author>
	<datestamp>1269454920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>HDMI does not have to use HDCP. I am typing this on my media center PC running ubuntu 9.10 connected to my HDTV via HDMI. Having 1 less cable and not having to worry about ground loops on the audio is a real benefit.</p><p>HDMI is nothing more than DVI and digital audio in the same cable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>HDMI does not have to use HDCP .
I am typing this on my media center PC running ubuntu 9.10 connected to my HDTV via HDMI .
Having 1 less cable and not having to worry about ground loops on the audio is a real benefit.HDMI is nothing more than DVI and digital audio in the same cable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>HDMI does not have to use HDCP.
I am typing this on my media center PC running ubuntu 9.10 connected to my HDTV via HDMI.
Having 1 less cable and not having to worry about ground loops on the audio is a real benefit.HDMI is nothing more than DVI and digital audio in the same cable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600028</id>
	<title>Re:Battery life?</title>
	<author>jwietelmann</author>
	<datestamp>1269454440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I read somewhere (sorry, no source link) that WiMax radios should theoretically require <em>less</em> power than current 3G technologies.  If this thing takes a hit in battery life, it's probably because it uses both 3G and 4G radios (unless the software's really smart about turning one off when the other has good signal).  Of course, if your new 4G speeds cause you to go nuts and start downloading huge torrents on-the-go, then the energy consumption of the radio is probably the least of your battery-draining concerns.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I read somewhere ( sorry , no source link ) that WiMax radios should theoretically require less power than current 3G technologies .
If this thing takes a hit in battery life , it 's probably because it uses both 3G and 4G radios ( unless the software 's really smart about turning one off when the other has good signal ) .
Of course , if your new 4G speeds cause you to go nuts and start downloading huge torrents on-the-go , then the energy consumption of the radio is probably the least of your battery-draining concerns .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read somewhere (sorry, no source link) that WiMax radios should theoretically require less power than current 3G technologies.
If this thing takes a hit in battery life, it's probably because it uses both 3G and 4G radios (unless the software's really smart about turning one off when the other has good signal).
Of course, if your new 4G speeds cause you to go nuts and start downloading huge torrents on-the-go, then the energy consumption of the radio is probably the least of your battery-draining concerns.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601414</id>
	<title>Re:And in related news no one here cares about...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269459600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>For Windows Mobile fans like me</p></div><p>Windows Mobile fans, do they really exist?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For Windows Mobile fans like meWindows Mobile fans , do they really exist ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For Windows Mobile fans like meWindows Mobile fans, do they really exist?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600082</id>
	<title>Re:HDMI jack?</title>
	<author>game kid</author>
	<datestamp>1269454620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know, right?  They should've went the extra inch, and make it record 1080p and play it out via 75-ohm coax, DisplayPort, and twitter.  Wimps.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know , right ?
They should 've went the extra inch , and make it record 1080p and play it out via 75-ohm coax , DisplayPort , and twitter .
Wimps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know, right?
They should've went the extra inch, and make it record 1080p and play it out via 75-ohm coax, DisplayPort, and twitter.
Wimps.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602640</id>
	<title>Re:Battery life?</title>
	<author>owlstead</author>
	<datestamp>1269464340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All the current phones use current if you use them continuously like a computer. But that goes for all battery powered devices - if you have an LCD color screen and a reasonably fast CPU, then the power requirements will be high.</p><p>If I use my android sparingly it will last a few days, which is - imho - ample, unless I am on vacation. And when I am on vacation I just connect the phone to my laptop or any other USB enabled device. In emergencies I could even bring my charger<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Since I am a bit of a nerd in the sense that I am behind a computer a long time of the day, the idea that you only require a mini or micro USB cable to charge your phone is simply brilliant - the phone will be right where I want it while it is charging (*and* providing an internet connection / data sync to boot).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All the current phones use current if you use them continuously like a computer .
But that goes for all battery powered devices - if you have an LCD color screen and a reasonably fast CPU , then the power requirements will be high.If I use my android sparingly it will last a few days , which is - imho - ample , unless I am on vacation .
And when I am on vacation I just connect the phone to my laptop or any other USB enabled device .
In emergencies I could even bring my charger : ) Since I am a bit of a nerd in the sense that I am behind a computer a long time of the day , the idea that you only require a mini or micro USB cable to charge your phone is simply brilliant - the phone will be right where I want it while it is charging ( * and * providing an internet connection / data sync to boot ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the current phones use current if you use them continuously like a computer.
But that goes for all battery powered devices - if you have an LCD color screen and a reasonably fast CPU, then the power requirements will be high.If I use my android sparingly it will last a few days, which is - imho - ample, unless I am on vacation.
And when I am on vacation I just connect the phone to my laptop or any other USB enabled device.
In emergencies I could even bring my charger :)Since I am a bit of a nerd in the sense that I am behind a computer a long time of the day, the idea that you only require a mini or micro USB cable to charge your phone is simply brilliant - the phone will be right where I want it while it is charging (*and* providing an internet connection / data sync to boot).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603548</id>
	<title>Re:HDMI jack?</title>
	<author>w0mprat</author>
	<datestamp>1269424680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Two words: iPhone phanboys</p><p>Watch them turn green.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Two words : iPhone phanboysWatch them turn green .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two words: iPhone phanboysWatch them turn green.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601096</id>
	<title>Re:Also..</title>
	<author>berwiki</author>
	<datestamp>1269458520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.thecopperwire.com/gecko.gif" title="thecopperwire.com" rel="nofollow">here</a> [thecopperwire.com] is a picture with the extended battery installed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>here [ thecopperwire.com ] is a picture with the extended battery installed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>here [thecopperwire.com] is a picture with the extended battery installed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600034</id>
	<title>Re:HDMI jack?</title>
	<author>Kotoku</author>
	<datestamp>1269454500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For America!</htmltext>
<tokenext>For America !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For America!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600392</id>
	<title>And in related news no one here cares about...</title>
	<author>toadlife</author>
	<datestamp>1269455880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>T-Mobile released the HTC HD2 today.</p><p>Here is a <a href="http://www.intomobile.com/2010/03/23/showdown-sprint-htc-evo-4g-vs-t-mobile-htc-hd2.html" title="intomobile.com" rel="nofollow">superficial comparison</a> [intomobile.com] of the Evo to the HD2.</p><p>For Windows Mobile fans like me who are not happy with the the direction Microsoft is going with WF7, the HD2 seems to be the last Hurrah for Windows Mobile 6.x series before we are forced to walk the plank and jump to another platform.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>T-Mobile released the HTC HD2 today.Here is a superficial comparison [ intomobile.com ] of the Evo to the HD2.For Windows Mobile fans like me who are not happy with the the direction Microsoft is going with WF7 , the HD2 seems to be the last Hurrah for Windows Mobile 6.x series before we are forced to walk the plank and jump to another platform .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>T-Mobile released the HTC HD2 today.Here is a superficial comparison [intomobile.com] of the Evo to the HD2.For Windows Mobile fans like me who are not happy with the the direction Microsoft is going with WF7, the HD2 seems to be the last Hurrah for Windows Mobile 6.x series before we are forced to walk the plank and jump to another platform.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31608564</id>
	<title>Re:HDMI jack?</title>
	<author>rdnetto</author>
	<datestamp>1269517800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The best part is that there is no way you are going to get 720p video quality from a phone camera.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The best part is that there is no way you are going to get 720p video quality from a phone camera .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The best part is that there is no way you are going to get 720p video quality from a phone camera.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603052</id>
	<title>Re:It's a TELEPHONE</title>
	<author>Buelldozer</author>
	<datestamp>1269422820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bandwidth, form factory, and battery life.</p><p>This phone has 4G AND a front facing camera. That has solved two of the three challanges. Depending on the efficiency of the 4G chipset they may have solved all three. We won't know until this summer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bandwidth , form factory , and battery life.This phone has 4G AND a front facing camera .
That has solved two of the three challanges .
Depending on the efficiency of the 4G chipset they may have solved all three .
We wo n't know until this summer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bandwidth, form factory, and battery life.This phone has 4G AND a front facing camera.
That has solved two of the three challanges.
Depending on the efficiency of the 4G chipset they may have solved all three.
We won't know until this summer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602756</id>
	<title>Re:Also..</title>
	<author>owlstead</author>
	<datestamp>1269421620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why aren't there phones where you can change the battery without loosing the connections/OS? With the current battery prices I would love to take a few charged batteries on holidays.</p><p>At least my HTC Hero will accept the bigger battery. It seems that the HTC legent uses a battery "slot" instead. That design choice will probably limit the choice of battery to use - it certainly won't fit the 3000 AH battery I just bought.</p><p>(I was about to write 3K mAH, but that's just weird)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why are n't there phones where you can change the battery without loosing the connections/OS ?
With the current battery prices I would love to take a few charged batteries on holidays.At least my HTC Hero will accept the bigger battery .
It seems that the HTC legent uses a battery " slot " instead .
That design choice will probably limit the choice of battery to use - it certainly wo n't fit the 3000 AH battery I just bought .
( I was about to write 3K mAH , but that 's just weird )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why aren't there phones where you can change the battery without loosing the connections/OS?
With the current battery prices I would love to take a few charged batteries on holidays.At least my HTC Hero will accept the bigger battery.
It seems that the HTC legent uses a battery "slot" instead.
That design choice will probably limit the choice of battery to use - it certainly won't fit the 3000 AH battery I just bought.
(I was about to write 3K mAH, but that's just weird)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602028</id>
	<title>does it blend?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269461940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i still get headache from using any mobile phone, news would be when a phone can use light instead of radiowaves!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>i still get headache from using any mobile phone , news would be when a phone can use light instead of radiowaves !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i still get headache from using any mobile phone, news would be when a phone can use light instead of radiowaves!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601444</id>
	<title>Re:The *best* feature:</title>
	<author>D Ninja</author>
	<datestamp>1269459720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not sure how latency would compare, but 4G is supposed to be achieve speeds of 275 Mbit/s downstream and over 75 Mbit/s upstream.  That should be more than enough for just browsing the web.  Probably wouldn't want to do any "heavy internetting" with it.  (Of course, that may be different in practice...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure how latency would compare , but 4G is supposed to be achieve speeds of 275 Mbit/s downstream and over 75 Mbit/s upstream .
That should be more than enough for just browsing the web .
Probably would n't want to do any " heavy internetting " with it .
( Of course , that may be different in practice... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure how latency would compare, but 4G is supposed to be achieve speeds of 275 Mbit/s downstream and over 75 Mbit/s upstream.
That should be more than enough for just browsing the web.
Probably wouldn't want to do any "heavy internetting" with it.
(Of course, that may be different in practice...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600210</id>
	<title>Re:4G only</title>
	<author>Chris Mattern</author>
	<datestamp>1269455100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That it would be true if it was 4G only.  Apparently the words "switchable on demand to EVDO Rev. A" did not penetrate for you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That it would be true if it was 4G only .
Apparently the words " switchable on demand to EVDO Rev .
A " did not penetrate for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That it would be true if it was 4G only.
Apparently the words "switchable on demand to EVDO Rev.
A" did not penetrate for you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602866</id>
	<title>Re:The *best* feature:</title>
	<author>raju1kabir</author>
	<datestamp>1269422100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I trialled a <a href="http://www.p1.com.my/" title="p1.com.my">local WiMAX service</a> [p1.com.my] for about 6 months. The latency from my desktop to their network was something like 40ms. I got fairly steady 5mbps transfer speeds (though they advertised "up to 10mbps"). That's not terrible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I trialled a local WiMAX service [ p1.com.my ] for about 6 months .
The latency from my desktop to their network was something like 40ms .
I got fairly steady 5mbps transfer speeds ( though they advertised " up to 10mbps " ) .
That 's not terrible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I trialled a local WiMAX service [p1.com.my] for about 6 months.
The latency from my desktop to their network was something like 40ms.
I got fairly steady 5mbps transfer speeds (though they advertised "up to 10mbps").
That's not terrible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600230</id>
	<title>No hardware keyboard...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269455220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too bad there's no hardware keyboard on this beast.  I can't stand using touchscreen keyboards.  Hopefully this isn't becoming the norm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too bad there 's no hardware keyboard on this beast .
I ca n't stand using touchscreen keyboards .
Hopefully this is n't becoming the norm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too bad there's no hardware keyboard on this beast.
I can't stand using touchscreen keyboards.
Hopefully this isn't becoming the norm.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600376</id>
	<title>Re:It's a TELEPHONE</title>
	<author>D Ninja</author>
	<datestamp>1269455820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sounds like every geeks wet dream. And yet I can't help but think to myself<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... this is a telephone. This is device whose primary purpose is to facilitate verbal communication.</p></div><p>That's where you're wrong.  None of these smart phones are telephones anymore.  They are computers (handheld and less powerful computers than our desktops, but computers nonetheless) that HAPPEN to make telephone calls.  Honestly, phone calls are the thing I do the least on my Droid.  I'm on travel quite a bit and being able to get to my e-mails, have a GPS to help me find the locations of my hotels and meetings, and also be able to enjoy some entertainment on flights has been awesome.</p><p>So, my advice (not that you asked for it) is to think about the phone as another integration into an "always on, always connected" world.  Things are going to keep moving in that direction.  For example, I am looking forward to my refrigerator being connected to the internet, being able to look at a list of items that I want to keep in stock, noticing when I'm running out of those items, and then sending a message to my local grocery store which will bring by the groceries for me and then bill it automatically.  Years down the road, but that type of convenience would be awesome.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like every geeks wet dream .
And yet I ca n't help but think to myself ... this is a telephone .
This is device whose primary purpose is to facilitate verbal communication.That 's where you 're wrong .
None of these smart phones are telephones anymore .
They are computers ( handheld and less powerful computers than our desktops , but computers nonetheless ) that HAPPEN to make telephone calls .
Honestly , phone calls are the thing I do the least on my Droid .
I 'm on travel quite a bit and being able to get to my e-mails , have a GPS to help me find the locations of my hotels and meetings , and also be able to enjoy some entertainment on flights has been awesome.So , my advice ( not that you asked for it ) is to think about the phone as another integration into an " always on , always connected " world .
Things are going to keep moving in that direction .
For example , I am looking forward to my refrigerator being connected to the internet , being able to look at a list of items that I want to keep in stock , noticing when I 'm running out of those items , and then sending a message to my local grocery store which will bring by the groceries for me and then bill it automatically .
Years down the road , but that type of convenience would be awesome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like every geeks wet dream.
And yet I can't help but think to myself ... this is a telephone.
This is device whose primary purpose is to facilitate verbal communication.That's where you're wrong.
None of these smart phones are telephones anymore.
They are computers (handheld and less powerful computers than our desktops, but computers nonetheless) that HAPPEN to make telephone calls.
Honestly, phone calls are the thing I do the least on my Droid.
I'm on travel quite a bit and being able to get to my e-mails, have a GPS to help me find the locations of my hotels and meetings, and also be able to enjoy some entertainment on flights has been awesome.So, my advice (not that you asked for it) is to think about the phone as another integration into an "always on, always connected" world.
Things are going to keep moving in that direction.
For example, I am looking forward to my refrigerator being connected to the internet, being able to look at a list of items that I want to keep in stock, noticing when I'm running out of those items, and then sending a message to my local grocery store which will bring by the groceries for me and then bill it automatically.
Years down the road, but that type of convenience would be awesome.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599856</id>
	<title>Voice?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269453960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"It swaps between EVDO Rev. A, WiMAX and Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g on demand"</p><p>Does this apply to calls as well as data? If so it is even more awesome than I originally thought.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" It swaps between EVDO Rev .
A , WiMAX and Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g on demand " Does this apply to calls as well as data ?
If so it is even more awesome than I originally thought .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It swaps between EVDO Rev.
A, WiMAX and Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g on demand"Does this apply to calls as well as data?
If so it is even more awesome than I originally thought.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601630</id>
	<title>Re:It's a TELEPHONE</title>
	<author>osgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1269460440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd assume that the extra low-res camera on the front of the phone is intended to make this sort of use possible.  Why else have it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd assume that the extra low-res camera on the front of the phone is intended to make this sort of use possible .
Why else have it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd assume that the extra low-res camera on the front of the phone is intended to make this sort of use possible.
Why else have it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602700</id>
	<title>Re:The *best* feature:</title>
	<author>raju1kabir</author>
	<datestamp>1269421440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"It works as a Wi-Fi hotspot, supporting up to 8 devices;" Wow!</p></div></blockquote><p>My 3-year-old Nokia phone (and really any Symbian S60 phone with wifi) does that, using a cheap program called <a href="http://www.joikushop.com/index.php?action=products&amp;mode=productDetails&amp;product\_id=33" title="joikushop.com">JoikuSpot</a> [joikushop.com]. I don't know how many client devices it supports simultaneously, but I've used it several times to provide connectivity for a conference room full of people.</p><p>Sucks batteries like you wouldn't believe, though. I can only run it for about an hour if it's not plugged in to the charger.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" It works as a Wi-Fi hotspot , supporting up to 8 devices ; " Wow ! My 3-year-old Nokia phone ( and really any Symbian S60 phone with wifi ) does that , using a cheap program called JoikuSpot [ joikushop.com ] .
I do n't know how many client devices it supports simultaneously , but I 've used it several times to provide connectivity for a conference room full of people.Sucks batteries like you would n't believe , though .
I can only run it for about an hour if it 's not plugged in to the charger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It works as a Wi-Fi hotspot, supporting up to 8 devices;" Wow!My 3-year-old Nokia phone (and really any Symbian S60 phone with wifi) does that, using a cheap program called JoikuSpot [joikushop.com].
I don't know how many client devices it supports simultaneously, but I've used it several times to provide connectivity for a conference room full of people.Sucks batteries like you wouldn't believe, though.
I can only run it for about an hour if it's not plugged in to the charger.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602738</id>
	<title>Perfect companion to this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269421620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is a laser pico projector http://microvision.com/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is a laser pico projector http : //microvision.com/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is a laser pico projector http://microvision.com/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600106</id>
	<title>Re:HDMI jack?</title>
	<author>DragonWriter</author>
	<datestamp>1269454740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>A phone that records 720p video and plays it out via an HDMI jack? WHY?</p></div></blockquote><p>Because its a handheld computer/digital camcorder/phone combination unit for people who want to do lots of things, but don't want to carry lots of gadgets.</p><p>If the question is "why HDMI?", my guess is the reason is "because HDMI is what you can most count on being supported on HDTVs, which are the most likely thing people are going to want to plug in their phone to play their 720p videos on" (for computers, presumably, they'll just download the video to the computer.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A phone that records 720p video and plays it out via an HDMI jack ?
WHY ? Because its a handheld computer/digital camcorder/phone combination unit for people who want to do lots of things , but do n't want to carry lots of gadgets.If the question is " why HDMI ?
" , my guess is the reason is " because HDMI is what you can most count on being supported on HDTVs , which are the most likely thing people are going to want to plug in their phone to play their 720p videos on " ( for computers , presumably , they 'll just download the video to the computer .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A phone that records 720p video and plays it out via an HDMI jack?
WHY?Because its a handheld computer/digital camcorder/phone combination unit for people who want to do lots of things, but don't want to carry lots of gadgets.If the question is "why HDMI?
", my guess is the reason is "because HDMI is what you can most count on being supported on HDTVs, which are the most likely thing people are going to want to plug in their phone to play their 720p videos on" (for computers, presumably, they'll just download the video to the computer.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602134</id>
	<title>Re:And in related news no one here cares about...</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1269462360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>For Windows Mobile fans...</p></div><p>Fascinating! You seem to be implying that there is more than one!! And I had always thought they were just a myth. What truly amazing times we live in, where such people live right alongside the rest of us, and we don't even know they're there!</p><p>Tell me, is it true that you all have fingertips as pointed as sharpened pencils, which allow you to actual <i>use</i> the OS? Or is it, like my friend believes, that you are all atoning for some great, and unspeakable crime? Perhaps you were AOL developers in your past life?<br>:-P</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For Windows Mobile fans...Fascinating !
You seem to be implying that there is more than one ! !
And I had always thought they were just a myth .
What truly amazing times we live in , where such people live right alongside the rest of us , and we do n't even know they 're there ! Tell me , is it true that you all have fingertips as pointed as sharpened pencils , which allow you to actual use the OS ?
Or is it , like my friend believes , that you are all atoning for some great , and unspeakable crime ?
Perhaps you were AOL developers in your past life ?
: -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For Windows Mobile fans...Fascinating!
You seem to be implying that there is more than one!!
And I had always thought they were just a myth.
What truly amazing times we live in, where such people live right alongside the rest of us, and we don't even know they're there!Tell me, is it true that you all have fingertips as pointed as sharpened pencils, which allow you to actual use the OS?
Or is it, like my friend believes, that you are all atoning for some great, and unspeakable crime?
Perhaps you were AOL developers in your past life?
:-P
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599952</id>
	<title>One flaw...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269454200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Estimated battery life: The amount of time it takes YouTube to load that shiny new HDMI video for you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Estimated battery life : The amount of time it takes YouTube to load that shiny new HDMI video for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Estimated battery life: The amount of time it takes YouTube to load that shiny new HDMI video for you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600396</id>
	<title>Re:Game Changer!</title>
	<author>UnknowingFool</author>
	<datestamp>1269455940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It could be a game changer for Sprint.  The reviewer only commented on all the geek technical specs.  The reviewer didn't review it for actual usability.  Most consumers care about usability first, app availability, coverage, etc.  Technical specifications are at the bottom of that list.  The only thing the reviewer did say was that it was fast but the network connection wasn't on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It could be a game changer for Sprint .
The reviewer only commented on all the geek technical specs .
The reviewer did n't review it for actual usability .
Most consumers care about usability first , app availability , coverage , etc .
Technical specifications are at the bottom of that list .
The only thing the reviewer did say was that it was fast but the network connection was n't on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It could be a game changer for Sprint.
The reviewer only commented on all the geek technical specs.
The reviewer didn't review it for actual usability.
Most consumers care about usability first, app availability, coverage, etc.
Technical specifications are at the bottom of that list.
The only thing the reviewer did say was that it was fast but the network connection wasn't on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600770</id>
	<title>Re:It's a TELEPHONE</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1269457200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry, but it's not.  At least not to a lot of us.  Maybe it is to you, but then why would you even care about this device enough to post your derision at the enhanced features?</p><p>I carry a Blackberry.  I do use it for phone calls.  Very, <b>very</b> rarely.  I probably make about 3-4 calls a week on it, and it's my only telephone.</p><p>I also use it for emails, Gmail, calendar, text messaging, instant messenger, contact manager, surfing the web, reading news on RSS, listening to music, taking photos and videos, Geocaching, driving directions, checking traffic, making small edits to Word and Excel documents, tethering my laptop to it for production support issues, recording voice notes, a flashlight, and probably a few other things that aren't coming to mind at the moment.  If it had a pair of pliers and a good blade, I could consolidate to one thing on my belt.</p><p>It's not a <b>tele</b>phone, it's a <b>smart</b>phone.  It's primary purpose is no longer verbal communication.  That is one of its functions. For me, frankly, voice is not one of the more important features on my smartphone.  But it is useful to have a phone from time to time.</p><p>I do understand that there is a significant segment of the population that just wants a phone without all the gadgets.  Great!  Buy one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , but it 's not .
At least not to a lot of us .
Maybe it is to you , but then why would you even care about this device enough to post your derision at the enhanced features ? I carry a Blackberry .
I do use it for phone calls .
Very , very rarely .
I probably make about 3-4 calls a week on it , and it 's my only telephone.I also use it for emails , Gmail , calendar , text messaging , instant messenger , contact manager , surfing the web , reading news on RSS , listening to music , taking photos and videos , Geocaching , driving directions , checking traffic , making small edits to Word and Excel documents , tethering my laptop to it for production support issues , recording voice notes , a flashlight , and probably a few other things that are n't coming to mind at the moment .
If it had a pair of pliers and a good blade , I could consolidate to one thing on my belt.It 's not a telephone , it 's a smartphone .
It 's primary purpose is no longer verbal communication .
That is one of its functions .
For me , frankly , voice is not one of the more important features on my smartphone .
But it is useful to have a phone from time to time.I do understand that there is a significant segment of the population that just wants a phone without all the gadgets .
Great ! Buy one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, but it's not.
At least not to a lot of us.
Maybe it is to you, but then why would you even care about this device enough to post your derision at the enhanced features?I carry a Blackberry.
I do use it for phone calls.
Very, very rarely.
I probably make about 3-4 calls a week on it, and it's my only telephone.I also use it for emails, Gmail, calendar, text messaging, instant messenger, contact manager, surfing the web, reading news on RSS, listening to music, taking photos and videos, Geocaching, driving directions, checking traffic, making small edits to Word and Excel documents, tethering my laptop to it for production support issues, recording voice notes, a flashlight, and probably a few other things that aren't coming to mind at the moment.
If it had a pair of pliers and a good blade, I could consolidate to one thing on my belt.It's not a telephone, it's a smartphone.
It's primary purpose is no longer verbal communication.
That is one of its functions.
For me, frankly, voice is not one of the more important features on my smartphone.
But it is useful to have a phone from time to time.I do understand that there is a significant segment of the population that just wants a phone without all the gadgets.
Great!  Buy one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599962</id>
	<title>Memory or storage?</title>
	<author>clang\_jangle</author>
	<datestamp>1269454260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>a helpful 1GB of built-in memory and 512MB of RAM</p></div></blockquote><p> That should read "1 GB of storage built-in and 512MB of RAM", shouldn't it?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>a helpful 1GB of built-in memory and 512MB of RAM That should read " 1 GB of storage built-in and 512MB of RAM " , should n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a helpful 1GB of built-in memory and 512MB of RAM That should read "1 GB of storage built-in and 512MB of RAM", shouldn't it?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600416</id>
	<title>Re:HDMI jack?</title>
	<author>jollespm</author>
	<datestamp>1269455940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apparently there are still a few features that haven't been announced yet. One speculation is a possible deal bundling Nextflix (or similar) functionality where one would presumably use the WiMAX connection to stream movies on demand to the phone. It would only make sense that you could then output to your HDTV.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently there are still a few features that have n't been announced yet .
One speculation is a possible deal bundling Nextflix ( or similar ) functionality where one would presumably use the WiMAX connection to stream movies on demand to the phone .
It would only make sense that you could then output to your HDTV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently there are still a few features that haven't been announced yet.
One speculation is a possible deal bundling Nextflix (or similar) functionality where one would presumably use the WiMAX connection to stream movies on demand to the phone.
It would only make sense that you could then output to your HDTV.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599976</id>
	<title>Wrong - Re:4G only</title>
	<author>RocketJeff</author>
	<datestamp>1269454320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the article - "The Evo 4G will swap between 3G and WiMAX for data depending on what's available; it will make all voice calls over Sprint's CDMA 1X network."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article - " The Evo 4G will swap between 3G and WiMAX for data depending on what 's available ; it will make all voice calls over Sprint 's CDMA 1X network .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article - "The Evo 4G will swap between 3G and WiMAX for data depending on what's available; it will make all voice calls over Sprint's CDMA 1X network.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600640</id>
	<title>Re:It's a TELEPHONE</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1269456720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>This is device whose primary purpose is to facilitate <b>verbal</b> communication.<br></i><br>Which reminds me -- why don't we have picturephones yet? We were supposed to have them in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001\_(film)" title="wikipedia.org">2001</a> [wikipedia.org], weren't we? Every sci-fi flic from the original Star Trek to <i>Blade Runner</i> to <i>Total Recall</i> has them. The technology is here; you can use a computer as a picture phone, but you can't use a phone as a picture phone, even though a phone has a vidio screen and a camera. Why?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is device whose primary purpose is to facilitate verbal communication.Which reminds me -- why do n't we have picturephones yet ?
We were supposed to have them in 2001 [ wikipedia.org ] , were n't we ?
Every sci-fi flic from the original Star Trek to Blade Runner to Total Recall has them .
The technology is here ; you can use a computer as a picture phone , but you ca n't use a phone as a picture phone , even though a phone has a vidio screen and a camera .
Why ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is device whose primary purpose is to facilitate verbal communication.Which reminds me -- why don't we have picturephones yet?
We were supposed to have them in 2001 [wikipedia.org], weren't we?
Every sci-fi flic from the original Star Trek to Blade Runner to Total Recall has them.
The technology is here; you can use a computer as a picture phone, but you can't use a phone as a picture phone, even though a phone has a vidio screen and a camera.
Why?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600324</id>
	<title>Super Phone? Aw, come on.</title>
	<author>dingen</author>
	<datestamp>1269455580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>We aren't calling Dell's latest machines "super computers" either, so there's really no need to name new phones with up-to-date specs "super phones". It's technology. New devices with faster hardware and more features are going to come out. Every new phone will be a "super phone", because that's how the market works. This phone will be deprecated in a year or so, just like every other IT toy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We are n't calling Dell 's latest machines " super computers " either , so there 's really no need to name new phones with up-to-date specs " super phones " .
It 's technology .
New devices with faster hardware and more features are going to come out .
Every new phone will be a " super phone " , because that 's how the market works .
This phone will be deprecated in a year or so , just like every other IT toy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We aren't calling Dell's latest machines "super computers" either, so there's really no need to name new phones with up-to-date specs "super phones".
It's technology.
New devices with faster hardware and more features are going to come out.
Every new phone will be a "super phone", because that's how the market works.
This phone will be deprecated in a year or so, just like every other IT toy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600044</id>
	<title>Not made by Apple?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269454500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FAIL.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FAIL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FAIL.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600650</id>
	<title>This. Is. Wrong.</title>
	<author>MonsterTrimble</author>
	<datestamp>1269456780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The phone runs Android 2.1 on a 1-GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon QSD8650 chipset along with a helpful 1GB of built-in memory and 512MB of RAM, which is assisted by a MicroSD slot supporting up to 32GB cards.</p> </div><p>OK, so this phone has more jam then my wife's and I's two celeron laptops, and is just about as powerful as my Sempron desktop. Why have a computer?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The phone runs Android 2.1 on a 1-GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon QSD8650 chipset along with a helpful 1GB of built-in memory and 512MB of RAM , which is assisted by a MicroSD slot supporting up to 32GB cards .
OK , so this phone has more jam then my wife 's and I 's two celeron laptops , and is just about as powerful as my Sempron desktop .
Why have a computer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The phone runs Android 2.1 on a 1-GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon QSD8650 chipset along with a helpful 1GB of built-in memory and 512MB of RAM, which is assisted by a MicroSD slot supporting up to 32GB cards.
OK, so this phone has more jam then my wife's and I's two celeron laptops, and is just about as powerful as my Sempron desktop.
Why have a computer?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31608574</id>
	<title>Re:Battery life?</title>
	<author>rdnetto</author>
	<datestamp>1269517920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its specs sound like the N900, minus the HDMI output &amp; 4G. So I'm guessing ~1 day if you use it for browsing, etc. Not sure if Android is more efficient than Maemo in terms of power consumption.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its specs sound like the N900 , minus the HDMI output &amp; 4G .
So I 'm guessing ~ 1 day if you use it for browsing , etc .
Not sure if Android is more efficient than Maemo in terms of power consumption .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its specs sound like the N900, minus the HDMI output &amp; 4G.
So I'm guessing ~1 day if you use it for browsing, etc.
Not sure if Android is more efficient than Maemo in terms of power consumption.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600042</id>
	<title>Re:4G only</title>
	<author>bcong</author>
	<datestamp>1269454500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>per TFA,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..."swapping between EVDO Rev. A, WiMAX and Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g on demand."  and "The Evo 4G will swap between 3G and WiMAX for data depending on what's available"

It works just fine on the marketing networks such as 3g and 4g, and on the networks everyone else knows and loves, ev-do rev. A and wimax</htmltext>
<tokenext>per TFA , ... " swapping between EVDO Rev .
A , WiMAX and Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g on demand .
" and " The Evo 4G will swap between 3G and WiMAX for data depending on what 's available " It works just fine on the marketing networks such as 3g and 4g , and on the networks everyone else knows and loves , ev-do rev .
A and wimax</tokentext>
<sentencetext>per TFA, ..."swapping between EVDO Rev.
A, WiMAX and Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g on demand.
"  and "The Evo 4G will swap between 3G and WiMAX for data depending on what's available"

It works just fine on the marketing networks such as 3g and 4g, and on the networks everyone else knows and loves, ev-do rev.
A and wimax</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600846</id>
	<title>Re:important features?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269457560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>its running android, so yes to both multi questions</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>its running android , so yes to both multi questions</tokentext>
<sentencetext>its running android, so yes to both multi questions</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600434</id>
	<title>Re:Battery life?</title>
	<author>e2d2</author>
	<datestamp>1269456060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slow down Tex. We'll need a credit check and a sample of your DNA first.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slow down Tex .
We 'll need a credit check and a sample of your DNA first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slow down Tex.
We'll need a credit check and a sample of your DNA first.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600708</id>
	<title>What the summary DOESN'T tell you</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1269456960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What the summary DOESN'T tell you is that on the internal battery talk time is 12 minutes. There is an optional extended battery available from the third parties, such as Optima, Diehard, EverStart, Autolite, etc.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What the summary DOES N'T tell you is that on the internal battery talk time is 12 minutes .
There is an optional extended battery available from the third parties , such as Optima , Diehard , EverStart , Autolite , etc .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What the summary DOESN'T tell you is that on the internal battery talk time is 12 minutes.
There is an optional extended battery available from the third parties, such as Optima, Diehard, EverStart, Autolite, etc.
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31604782</id>
	<title>Re:HDMI jack?</title>
	<author>Gunstick</author>
	<datestamp>1269430140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you can actually run audi and video over DVI. At least that's what my dreambox does over the DVI to HDMI cable. Seems the box simply puts the HDMI signal onto the DVI plug. Probably to not have to pay HDMI licensing costs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you can actually run audi and video over DVI .
At least that 's what my dreambox does over the DVI to HDMI cable .
Seems the box simply puts the HDMI signal onto the DVI plug .
Probably to not have to pay HDMI licensing costs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you can actually run audi and video over DVI.
At least that's what my dreambox does over the DVI to HDMI cable.
Seems the box simply puts the HDMI signal onto the DVI plug.
Probably to not have to pay HDMI licensing costs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31606810</id>
	<title>Re:And in related news no one here cares about...</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1269446040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>For Windows Mobile fans like me who are not happy with the the direction Microsoft is going with WF7,</p></div></blockquote><p>

For you there is Android. It's like WinMo but without the bugs and horrible interface.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For Windows Mobile fans like me who are not happy with the the direction Microsoft is going with WF7 , For you there is Android .
It 's like WinMo but without the bugs and horrible interface .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For Windows Mobile fans like me who are not happy with the the direction Microsoft is going with WF7,

For you there is Android.
It's like WinMo but without the bugs and horrible interface.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31604906</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck Everything, We're Doing 5G</title>
	<author>cortesoft</author>
	<datestamp>1269430920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>5G! That's like, 25\% more G!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>5G !
That 's like , 25 \ % more G !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>5G!
That's like, 25\% more G!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601398</id>
	<title>Re:can you install more than 5 apps to it?</title>
	<author>99BottlesOfBeerInMyF</author>
	<datestamp>1269459540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p> Android would be a lot better if Google hadn't crippled the app capability so you are forced to do everything online</p></div><p>How are Android apps crippled?</p></div><p>The previous poster is talking about the inability of Android to run apps stored anywhere but the internal memory, significantly limiting devices like this one, with significant storage capacity, because that capacity cannot be easily used to store applications, just data. Some game makers, for example, have said they cannot port to most android phones because their games are larger than the internal storage.</p><p>Hopefully Google will be able to resolve this issue going forward and some app developers are already working around it by installing data packages for their apps to Flash and referencing them from within their application. It's not a good solution, but it helps some.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Android would be a lot better if Google had n't crippled the app capability so you are forced to do everything onlineHow are Android apps crippled ? The previous poster is talking about the inability of Android to run apps stored anywhere but the internal memory , significantly limiting devices like this one , with significant storage capacity , because that capacity can not be easily used to store applications , just data .
Some game makers , for example , have said they can not port to most android phones because their games are larger than the internal storage.Hopefully Google will be able to resolve this issue going forward and some app developers are already working around it by installing data packages for their apps to Flash and referencing them from within their application .
It 's not a good solution , but it helps some .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Android would be a lot better if Google hadn't crippled the app capability so you are forced to do everything onlineHow are Android apps crippled?The previous poster is talking about the inability of Android to run apps stored anywhere but the internal memory, significantly limiting devices like this one, with significant storage capacity, because that capacity cannot be easily used to store applications, just data.
Some game makers, for example, have said they cannot port to most android phones because their games are larger than the internal storage.Hopefully Google will be able to resolve this issue going forward and some app developers are already working around it by installing data packages for their apps to Flash and referencing them from within their application.
It's not a good solution, but it helps some.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603344</id>
	<title>Re:The *best* feature:</title>
	<author>DragonWriter</author>
	<datestamp>1269423960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"It works as a Wi-Fi hotspot, supporting up to 8 devices;"</p><p>Wow! That's insane, considering that laptop wireless sharing is only now just becoming mainstream.</p><p>How many people will buy this phone, and ditch dsl, cable, etc? Smaller than any dsl or cable box, uses less power too I'd bet.</p></div></blockquote><p>Yeah, but its more expensive in up front cost, and almost certainly more expensive for the ongoing cost as well if you use it significantly (data plans typically have caps on the order of 5-10GB/mo where additional charges kick in), so its probably not a good choice for a replacement for an always-on home connection.</p><p>OTOH, it sounds like it would be nice as a mobile "personal access point" if you've got other WiFi-enabled gadgets -- like the many other devices that do the same, but with the advantage that WiMax is faster than 3G.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" It works as a Wi-Fi hotspot , supporting up to 8 devices ; " Wow !
That 's insane , considering that laptop wireless sharing is only now just becoming mainstream.How many people will buy this phone , and ditch dsl , cable , etc ?
Smaller than any dsl or cable box , uses less power too I 'd bet.Yeah , but its more expensive in up front cost , and almost certainly more expensive for the ongoing cost as well if you use it significantly ( data plans typically have caps on the order of 5-10GB/mo where additional charges kick in ) , so its probably not a good choice for a replacement for an always-on home connection.OTOH , it sounds like it would be nice as a mobile " personal access point " if you 've got other WiFi-enabled gadgets -- like the many other devices that do the same , but with the advantage that WiMax is faster than 3G .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It works as a Wi-Fi hotspot, supporting up to 8 devices;"Wow!
That's insane, considering that laptop wireless sharing is only now just becoming mainstream.How many people will buy this phone, and ditch dsl, cable, etc?
Smaller than any dsl or cable box, uses less power too I'd bet.Yeah, but its more expensive in up front cost, and almost certainly more expensive for the ongoing cost as well if you use it significantly (data plans typically have caps on the order of 5-10GB/mo where additional charges kick in), so its probably not a good choice for a replacement for an always-on home connection.OTOH, it sounds like it would be nice as a mobile "personal access point" if you've got other WiFi-enabled gadgets -- like the many other devices that do the same, but with the advantage that WiMax is faster than 3G.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603684</id>
	<title>Re:No hardware keyboard...</title>
	<author>Tumbleweed</author>
	<datestamp>1269425340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Too bad there's no hardware keyboard on this beast. I can't stand using touchscreen keyboards. Hopefully this isn't becoming the norm.</i></p><p>If you look at the Android phones that have been released and shown, this is definitely becoming the norm. This particular phone has a big friggin' screen, though, and if used with something like Swype, should produce better results than most cellphone keyboards, because almost all cellphone keyboards are UTTER CRAP (hello Droid). The new texting speed record was just set by someone using Swype the other day, I think.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too bad there 's no hardware keyboard on this beast .
I ca n't stand using touchscreen keyboards .
Hopefully this is n't becoming the norm.If you look at the Android phones that have been released and shown , this is definitely becoming the norm .
This particular phone has a big friggin ' screen , though , and if used with something like Swype , should produce better results than most cellphone keyboards , because almost all cellphone keyboards are UTTER CRAP ( hello Droid ) .
The new texting speed record was just set by someone using Swype the other day , I think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too bad there's no hardware keyboard on this beast.
I can't stand using touchscreen keyboards.
Hopefully this isn't becoming the norm.If you look at the Android phones that have been released and shown, this is definitely becoming the norm.
This particular phone has a big friggin' screen, though, and if used with something like Swype, should produce better results than most cellphone keyboards, because almost all cellphone keyboards are UTTER CRAP (hello Droid).
The new texting speed record was just set by someone using Swype the other day, I think.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602978</id>
	<title>Re:Also..</title>
	<author>Buelldozer</author>
	<datestamp>1269422460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I didn't realize that this was a Motorola product!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't realize that this was a Motorola product !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't realize that this was a Motorola product!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601166</id>
	<title>Re:It's a TELEPHONE</title>
	<author>TimTheFoolMan</author>
	<datestamp>1269458760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&lt;quote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sounds like every geeks wet dream. And yet I can't help but think to myself<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... this is a &lt;i&gt;telephone&lt;/i&gt;. This is device whose primary purpose is to facilitate &lt;i&gt;verbal communication&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/quote&gt;<br><br>You must be new here. - Tim</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like every geeks wet dream .
And yet I ca n't help but think to myself ... this is a telephone .
This is device whose primary purpose is to facilitate verbal communication.You must be new here .
- Tim</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like every geeks wet dream.
And yet I can't help but think to myself ... this is a telephone.
This is device whose primary purpose is to facilitate verbal communication.You must be new here.
- Tim
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602964</id>
	<title>Re:The *best* feature:</title>
	<author>hydroponx</author>
	<datestamp>1269422400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When did they do that ? Tethering worked the last time I tried it but they don't provide an application for it, I use tetherbot when I need to. It's free and works fine for browsing http, but it wouldn't work to well for vpn or other services unless you can configure a proxy for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When did they do that ?
Tethering worked the last time I tried it but they do n't provide an application for it , I use tetherbot when I need to .
It 's free and works fine for browsing http , but it would n't work to well for vpn or other services unless you can configure a proxy for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When did they do that ?
Tethering worked the last time I tried it but they don't provide an application for it, I use tetherbot when I need to.
It's free and works fine for browsing http, but it wouldn't work to well for vpn or other services unless you can configure a proxy for it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31604688</id>
	<title>Re:The *best* feature:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269429660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like simple tethering, which you could do with the G1.  I did cancel cable/internet because they kept jacking up the price, and used a WAP w/dd-wrt to connect to my G1 - but 3G just really wasn't great at streaming video or playing games online.  I now have internet without cable which is fairly cheap, but can pickup some HD ClearQAM channels and OTA with a HDHomeRun, or stream online if the mood strikes.  4G would be awesome, and I could finally eliminate that internet bill.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like simple tethering , which you could do with the G1 .
I did cancel cable/internet because they kept jacking up the price , and used a WAP w/dd-wrt to connect to my G1 - but 3G just really was n't great at streaming video or playing games online .
I now have internet without cable which is fairly cheap , but can pickup some HD ClearQAM channels and OTA with a HDHomeRun , or stream online if the mood strikes .
4G would be awesome , and I could finally eliminate that internet bill .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like simple tethering, which you could do with the G1.
I did cancel cable/internet because they kept jacking up the price, and used a WAP w/dd-wrt to connect to my G1 - but 3G just really wasn't great at streaming video or playing games online.
I now have internet without cable which is fairly cheap, but can pickup some HD ClearQAM channels and OTA with a HDHomeRun, or stream online if the mood strikes.
4G would be awesome, and I could finally eliminate that internet bill.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600084</id>
	<title>Re:HDMI jack?</title>
	<author>Impsyn</author>
	<datestamp>1269454680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A phone that records 720p video and plays it out via an HDMI jack?  WHY?</p></div><p>Presumably one could playback not only the videos they personally record using the built in camera but also videos that they have loaded into the phone. For travelers that means if you can find something with HDMI-in (television, monitor or projector) you can watch your videos/movies on something a little more accommodating than the 4.3 inch screen. Combo a unit like this with a lightweight projector and I can see a lot of value for those who do business presentations.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A phone that records 720p video and plays it out via an HDMI jack ?
WHY ? Presumably one could playback not only the videos they personally record using the built in camera but also videos that they have loaded into the phone .
For travelers that means if you can find something with HDMI-in ( television , monitor or projector ) you can watch your videos/movies on something a little more accommodating than the 4.3 inch screen .
Combo a unit like this with a lightweight projector and I can see a lot of value for those who do business presentations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A phone that records 720p video and plays it out via an HDMI jack?
WHY?Presumably one could playback not only the videos they personally record using the built in camera but also videos that they have loaded into the phone.
For travelers that means if you can find something with HDMI-in (television, monitor or projector) you can watch your videos/movies on something a little more accommodating than the 4.3 inch screen.
Combo a unit like this with a lightweight projector and I can see a lot of value for those who do business presentations.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31606016</id>
	<title>Mother F*(ker</title>
	<author>WillDraven</author>
	<datestamp>1269438540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I <b>just</b> went through the whole compare carriers, phones, coverage, plans, etc. and ended up buying a Moment. Now you have to come out with this, when I'm 2 years away from being eligible for a new contract (and a subsidized phone).</p><p>Unless I win the lottery (or sell a few houses to somebody who did) there's no way I'm going to be able to afford paying cash for this sucker.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just went through the whole compare carriers , phones , coverage , plans , etc .
and ended up buying a Moment .
Now you have to come out with this , when I 'm 2 years away from being eligible for a new contract ( and a subsidized phone ) .Unless I win the lottery ( or sell a few houses to somebody who did ) there 's no way I 'm going to be able to afford paying cash for this sucker .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just went through the whole compare carriers, phones, coverage, plans, etc.
and ended up buying a Moment.
Now you have to come out with this, when I'm 2 years away from being eligible for a new contract (and a subsidized phone).Unless I win the lottery (or sell a few houses to somebody who did) there's no way I'm going to be able to afford paying cash for this sucker.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600012</id>
	<title>Re:4G only</title>
	<author>Kotoku</author>
	<datestamp>1269454440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, it drops back to existing standards. If you understand the tech specs in the article it is pretty obvious. Do you think when 3G came out that phones ONLY worked on the few towers that supported that specific standard? No way!</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it drops back to existing standards .
If you understand the tech specs in the article it is pretty obvious .
Do you think when 3G came out that phones ONLY worked on the few towers that supported that specific standard ?
No way !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it drops back to existing standards.
If you understand the tech specs in the article it is pretty obvious.
Do you think when 3G came out that phones ONLY worked on the few towers that supported that specific standard?
No way!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600886</id>
	<title>You don't have 4G in the US!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269457740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They talk about up to 12 Mb/sec download?!? That is not 4G speed, it's 3G. Here is a test of a real 4G network in Stockholm. They get download speeds of 90 Mb/sec. And yes you can buy your 4G modem today.</p><p>More info: http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=sv&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.idg.se\%2F2.1085\%2F1.305135\%2Fforsta-testet-telia-4g</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They talk about up to 12 Mb/sec download ? ! ?
That is not 4G speed , it 's 3G .
Here is a test of a real 4G network in Stockholm .
They get download speeds of 90 Mb/sec .
And yes you can buy your 4G modem today.More info : http : //translate.google.com/translate ? sl = sv&amp;tl = en&amp;u = http \ % 3A \ % 2F \ % 2Fwww.idg.se \ % 2F2.1085 \ % 2F1.305135 \ % 2Fforsta-testet-telia-4g</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They talk about up to 12 Mb/sec download?!?
That is not 4G speed, it's 3G.
Here is a test of a real 4G network in Stockholm.
They get download speeds of 90 Mb/sec.
And yes you can buy your 4G modem today.More info: http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=sv&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.idg.se\%2F2.1085\%2F1.305135\%2Fforsta-testet-telia-4g</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600462</id>
	<title>Re:The *best* feature:</title>
	<author>D Ninja</author>
	<datestamp>1269456180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How many people will buy this phone, and ditch dsl, cable, etc? Smaller than any dsl or cable box, uses less power too I'd bet.</p></div><p>Might not be a bad idea.  Data speeds of 4G (according to Wikipedia) should be somewhere in the range of 275 Mbit/s downstream and over 75 Mbit/s upstream.  Of course, it also depends if companies are going to allow for "unlimited" data plans.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How many people will buy this phone , and ditch dsl , cable , etc ?
Smaller than any dsl or cable box , uses less power too I 'd bet.Might not be a bad idea .
Data speeds of 4G ( according to Wikipedia ) should be somewhere in the range of 275 Mbit/s downstream and over 75 Mbit/s upstream .
Of course , it also depends if companies are going to allow for " unlimited " data plans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many people will buy this phone, and ditch dsl, cable, etc?
Smaller than any dsl or cable box, uses less power too I'd bet.Might not be a bad idea.
Data speeds of 4G (according to Wikipedia) should be somewhere in the range of 275 Mbit/s downstream and over 75 Mbit/s upstream.
Of course, it also depends if companies are going to allow for "unlimited" data plans.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31605216</id>
	<title>Re:The *best* feature:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269432840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Been using my HTC Windows Mobile on Sprint with WMWiFiMobile for the last three years or so. You can freakin' torrent with these and get around 1 Mb/s download to a laptop when the network is not so congested. Used to use it to tether over wifi to G1 iPhones to let them browse the web properly without that EDGEy molasses feeling.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Been using my HTC Windows Mobile on Sprint with WMWiFiMobile for the last three years or so .
You can freakin ' torrent with these and get around 1 Mb/s download to a laptop when the network is not so congested .
Used to use it to tether over wifi to G1 iPhones to let them browse the web properly without that EDGEy molasses feeling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Been using my HTC Windows Mobile on Sprint with WMWiFiMobile for the last three years or so.
You can freakin' torrent with these and get around 1 Mb/s download to a laptop when the network is not so congested.
Used to use it to tether over wifi to G1 iPhones to let them browse the web properly without that EDGEy molasses feeling.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601802</id>
	<title>720p what?</title>
	<author>TheSync</author>
	<datestamp>1269461100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>720p30 or 720p60?</p><p>(or 720p 30/1.001 720p 60/1.001 ?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>720p30 or 720p60 ?
( or 720p 30/1.001 720p 60/1.001 ?
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>720p30 or 720p60?
(or 720p 30/1.001 720p 60/1.001 ?
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31604376</id>
	<title>Re:It's a TELEPHONE</title>
	<author>isorox</author>
	<datestamp>1269428160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Sounds like every geeks wet dream. And yet I can't help but think to myself<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... this is a telephone. This is device whose primary purpose is to facilitate verbal communication.</i></p><p>today I had a 50 minute journey home. The first 20 involve standing on a train.</p><p>The mobile device I carry allowed me to listen to music, read two emails, send one, then play a little game.</p><p>I then got a seat, continued listening to music, checked a new email, updated my calendar, then started to read<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</p><p>After 40 minutes, the music paused, and the screen I was looking at told me my wife was ringing. I answered the phone, no need to remove headphones, then went back to slashdot to write this reply.</p><p>Smart phones, with a decent sized screen, and a real webbrowser, are first and formost ultra portable computers. The phone is an addon. Most mornings I break out the laptop and vim or eclipse to do some serious work, but to combine an mp3 player, phone, and javascript capable web browser, takes the device way beyond phone. I hardly use a phone, email and web though...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like every geeks wet dream .
And yet I ca n't help but think to myself ... this is a telephone .
This is device whose primary purpose is to facilitate verbal communication.today I had a 50 minute journey home .
The first 20 involve standing on a train.The mobile device I carry allowed me to listen to music , read two emails , send one , then play a little game.I then got a seat , continued listening to music , checked a new email , updated my calendar , then started to read /.After 40 minutes , the music paused , and the screen I was looking at told me my wife was ringing .
I answered the phone , no need to remove headphones , then went back to slashdot to write this reply.Smart phones , with a decent sized screen , and a real webbrowser , are first and formost ultra portable computers .
The phone is an addon .
Most mornings I break out the laptop and vim or eclipse to do some serious work , but to combine an mp3 player , phone , and javascript capable web browser , takes the device way beyond phone .
I hardly use a phone , email and web though.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like every geeks wet dream.
And yet I can't help but think to myself ... this is a telephone.
This is device whose primary purpose is to facilitate verbal communication.today I had a 50 minute journey home.
The first 20 involve standing on a train.The mobile device I carry allowed me to listen to music, read two emails, send one, then play a little game.I then got a seat, continued listening to music, checked a new email, updated my calendar, then started to read /.After 40 minutes, the music paused, and the screen I was looking at told me my wife was ringing.
I answered the phone, no need to remove headphones, then went back to slashdot to write this reply.Smart phones, with a decent sized screen, and a real webbrowser, are first and formost ultra portable computers.
The phone is an addon.
Most mornings I break out the laptop and vim or eclipse to do some serious work, but to combine an mp3 player, phone, and javascript capable web browser, takes the device way beyond phone.
I hardly use a phone, email and web though...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600480</id>
	<title>Re:HDMI jack?</title>
	<author>Zach978</author>
	<datestamp>1269456240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sure the video file will be sitting on your device's SD card...not that hard to plug in your phone via usb and download it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure the video file will be sitting on your device 's SD card...not that hard to plug in your phone via usb and download it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure the video file will be sitting on your device's SD card...not that hard to plug in your phone via usb and download it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602628</id>
	<title>Re:important features?</title>
	<author>someSnarkyBastard</author>
	<datestamp>1269464280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Android 2.1 has both -- proud user of a hacked HTC Magic running OpenEclair (the open-source version of Android 2.1 for the unassimilated, ps resistance is futile<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Android 2.1 has both -- proud user of a hacked HTC Magic running OpenEclair ( the open-source version of Android 2.1 for the unassimilated , ps resistance is futile : -P )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Android 2.1 has both -- proud user of a hacked HTC Magic running OpenEclair (the open-source version of Android 2.1 for the unassimilated, ps resistance is futile :-P)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599982</id>
	<title>Re:HDMI jack?</title>
	<author>0100010001010011</author>
	<datestamp>1269454320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1) Porn &amp; Sexting.<br>2) Policing the police state. How many photos/videos have we seen released in recent years of police abusing their power? Stuff that would have just been your word vs his in the past. Shoving kids off skate boards, body checking bicyclists, etc.</p><p>I was the last person that wanted a camera on my phone. I just wanted a (*&amp;3@ phone. That camera phone saved my ass from insurance when someone ran a red light and made up a whole lot of false claims.</p><p>Even if 99.99\% of the stuff generated on the phone is useless, It's that extra 0.01\% that shows a major disaster unfolding (9/11), gets the word out about what is happening (Iran Elections), etc that I'm interested in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) Porn &amp; Sexting.2 ) Policing the police state .
How many photos/videos have we seen released in recent years of police abusing their power ?
Stuff that would have just been your word vs his in the past .
Shoving kids off skate boards , body checking bicyclists , etc.I was the last person that wanted a camera on my phone .
I just wanted a ( * &amp;3 @ phone .
That camera phone saved my ass from insurance when someone ran a red light and made up a whole lot of false claims.Even if 99.99 \ % of the stuff generated on the phone is useless , It 's that extra 0.01 \ % that shows a major disaster unfolding ( 9/11 ) , gets the word out about what is happening ( Iran Elections ) , etc that I 'm interested in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) Porn &amp; Sexting.2) Policing the police state.
How many photos/videos have we seen released in recent years of police abusing their power?
Stuff that would have just been your word vs his in the past.
Shoving kids off skate boards, body checking bicyclists, etc.I was the last person that wanted a camera on my phone.
I just wanted a (*&amp;3@ phone.
That camera phone saved my ass from insurance when someone ran a red light and made up a whole lot of false claims.Even if 99.99\% of the stuff generated on the phone is useless, It's that extra 0.01\% that shows a major disaster unfolding (9/11), gets the word out about what is happening (Iran Elections), etc that I'm interested in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31660878</id>
	<title>Re:Two very important points missing:</title>
	<author>alexo</author>
	<datestamp>1269893640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>1. What is the battery life.<br>2. What is the price.</p></div> </blockquote><p>3. Where can I get one with a physical keyboard.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
What is the battery life.2 .
What is the price .
3. Where can I get one with a physical keyboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
What is the battery life.2.
What is the price.
3. Where can I get one with a physical keyboard.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603088</id>
	<title>Re:HDMI jack?</title>
	<author>jsepeta</author>
	<datestamp>1269422940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>underskirt videos, ya big dummy!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>underskirt videos , ya big dummy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>underskirt videos, ya big dummy!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600490</id>
	<title>Re:The *best* feature:</title>
	<author>dingen</author>
	<datestamp>1269456240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How many people will buy this phone, and ditch dsl, cable, etc?</p></div><p>Even the best mobile connections are godawfully slow and have insanely high latencies compared with even modest wired broadband connections. You'll only switch if you absolutely don't care about the speed of your internet connection.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How many people will buy this phone , and ditch dsl , cable , etc ? Even the best mobile connections are godawfully slow and have insanely high latencies compared with even modest wired broadband connections .
You 'll only switch if you absolutely do n't care about the speed of your internet connection .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many people will buy this phone, and ditch dsl, cable, etc?Even the best mobile connections are godawfully slow and have insanely high latencies compared with even modest wired broadband connections.
You'll only switch if you absolutely don't care about the speed of your internet connection.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600358</id>
	<title>Re:It's a TELEPHONE</title>
	<author>CohibaVancouver</author>
	<datestamp>1269455760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>this is a telephone. This is device whose primary purpose is to facilitate verbal communication</i> </p><p>Not any more.  These devices are largely small(ish) wireless computers with touch-screen interfaces.  I don't have an iLeash, but my friends who do appear to use them as 'computers' much more than they use them for verbal communications.  Sure, they allow for verbal comms, but it's only one of many features.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this is a telephone .
This is device whose primary purpose is to facilitate verbal communication Not any more .
These devices are largely small ( ish ) wireless computers with touch-screen interfaces .
I do n't have an iLeash , but my friends who do appear to use them as 'computers ' much more than they use them for verbal communications .
Sure , they allow for verbal comms , but it 's only one of many features .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this is a telephone.
This is device whose primary purpose is to facilitate verbal communication Not any more.
These devices are largely small(ish) wireless computers with touch-screen interfaces.
I don't have an iLeash, but my friends who do appear to use them as 'computers' much more than they use them for verbal communications.
Sure, they allow for verbal comms, but it's only one of many features.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603948</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>wandazulu</author>
	<datestamp>1269426360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...any reason to get a Pre anymore?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...any reason to get a Pre anymore ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...any reason to get a Pre anymore?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602878</id>
	<title>Re:Also..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269422160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Suddenly I'm picturing the old 1980s bricks and bag phones. My dad had both since he worked as a doctor. Ahhh, memories...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Suddenly I 'm picturing the old 1980s bricks and bag phones .
My dad had both since he worked as a doctor .
Ahhh , memories.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Suddenly I'm picturing the old 1980s bricks and bag phones.
My dad had both since he worked as a doctor.
Ahhh, memories...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601532</id>
	<title>It would be nice if Sprint dropped prices now</title>
	<author>gelfling</author>
	<datestamp>1269460020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The prices that is, on other phones. But they are typically very very very slow to do that. I doubt the Google phones they have now will come down in price for a year.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The prices that is , on other phones .
But they are typically very very very slow to do that .
I doubt the Google phones they have now will come down in price for a year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The prices that is, on other phones.
But they are typically very very very slow to do that.
I doubt the Google phones they have now will come down in price for a year.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31604816</id>
	<title>Re:Voice?</title>
	<author>Facegarden</author>
	<datestamp>1269430320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"It swaps between EVDO Rev. A, WiMAX and Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g on demand"</p><p>Does this apply to calls as well as data? If so it is even more awesome than I originally thought.</p></div><p>Well, android 2.1 and on (maybe earlier too?) does have the built-in capability to make calls with google voice, which would then be able to use the data connection.</p><p>I've got my Nexus One to use google voice only for voicemail and international calls. With the voicemail, it records the message, transcribes the voice to text, and can text or email you the text, or you can use the free google voice app to both see the text, click any phone numbers as links, and listen to the message a-la Visual Voicemail (by just clicking play, rather than having to dial voicemail).</p><p>The fact that it transcribes messages to text, and the fact that its all built-in to the OS (something like Settings&gt;Call Settings&gt; Voicemail) literally blew my mind.</p><p>Android is seriously getting amazing.<br>-Taylor</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" It swaps between EVDO Rev .
A , WiMAX and Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g on demand " Does this apply to calls as well as data ?
If so it is even more awesome than I originally thought.Well , android 2.1 and on ( maybe earlier too ?
) does have the built-in capability to make calls with google voice , which would then be able to use the data connection.I 've got my Nexus One to use google voice only for voicemail and international calls .
With the voicemail , it records the message , transcribes the voice to text , and can text or email you the text , or you can use the free google voice app to both see the text , click any phone numbers as links , and listen to the message a-la Visual Voicemail ( by just clicking play , rather than having to dial voicemail ) .The fact that it transcribes messages to text , and the fact that its all built-in to the OS ( something like Settings &gt; Call Settings &gt; Voicemail ) literally blew my mind.Android is seriously getting amazing.-Taylor</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It swaps between EVDO Rev.
A, WiMAX and Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g on demand"Does this apply to calls as well as data?
If so it is even more awesome than I originally thought.Well, android 2.1 and on (maybe earlier too?
) does have the built-in capability to make calls with google voice, which would then be able to use the data connection.I've got my Nexus One to use google voice only for voicemail and international calls.
With the voicemail, it records the message, transcribes the voice to text, and can text or email you the text, or you can use the free google voice app to both see the text, click any phone numbers as links, and listen to the message a-la Visual Voicemail (by just clicking play, rather than having to dial voicemail).The fact that it transcribes messages to text, and the fact that its all built-in to the OS (something like Settings&gt;Call Settings&gt; Voicemail) literally blew my mind.Android is seriously getting amazing.-Taylor
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31619410</id>
	<title>Re:It's a TELEPHONE</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269520260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They've had front-facing cameras and video conferencing technology in Japan for years, but it just never took off like the wireless companies thought it would.  Instead, to their complete surprise, texting became the next big thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 've had front-facing cameras and video conferencing technology in Japan for years , but it just never took off like the wireless companies thought it would .
Instead , to their complete surprise , texting became the next big thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They've had front-facing cameras and video conferencing technology in Japan for years, but it just never took off like the wireless companies thought it would.
Instead, to their complete surprise, texting became the next big thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600364</id>
	<title>Re:It's a TELEPHONE</title>
	<author>oodaloop</author>
	<datestamp>1269455760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its <i>ancestors</i> were phones.  This thing is more evolved.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its ancestors were phones .
This thing is more evolved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its ancestors were phones.
This thing is more evolved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599844</id>
	<title>Wow.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269453900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Also, their marketing director said "philosophically, we've been very aggressive about mobile broadband." Besides being "philosophically aggressive"... will it be able to make coffee as well?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , their marketing director said " philosophically , we 've been very aggressive about mobile broadband .
" Besides being " philosophically aggressive " ... will it be able to make coffee as well ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, their marketing director said "philosophically, we've been very aggressive about mobile broadband.
" Besides being "philosophically aggressive"... will it be able to make coffee as well?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601632</id>
	<title>Re:YAY!</title>
	<author>organgtool</author>
	<datestamp>1269460440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"All you read and wear or see and hear on [the internet] is a product begging for your fatass dirty dollar" -- Tool</htmltext>
<tokenext>" All you read and wear or see and hear on [ the internet ] is a product begging for your fatass dirty dollar " -- Tool</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"All you read and wear or see and hear on [the internet] is a product begging for your fatass dirty dollar" -- Tool</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603170</id>
	<title>Re:No hardware keyboard...</title>
	<author>RightSaidFred99</author>
	<datestamp>1269423240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is becoming the norm.  I bought a Samsung Moment intentionally because it has an awesome physical keyboard.  But I find myself using it less and less and if the screen was a little bigger and the onscreen keyboard just a little better I'd probably prefer a thinner phone with no keyboard.  Most people think similarly so I think the number of phones with a keyboard will not hit 0, but it will generally be less and less common.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is becoming the norm .
I bought a Samsung Moment intentionally because it has an awesome physical keyboard .
But I find myself using it less and less and if the screen was a little bigger and the onscreen keyboard just a little better I 'd probably prefer a thinner phone with no keyboard .
Most people think similarly so I think the number of phones with a keyboard will not hit 0 , but it will generally be less and less common .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is becoming the norm.
I bought a Samsung Moment intentionally because it has an awesome physical keyboard.
But I find myself using it less and less and if the screen was a little bigger and the onscreen keyboard just a little better I'd probably prefer a thinner phone with no keyboard.
Most people think similarly so I think the number of phones with a keyboard will not hit 0, but it will generally be less and less common.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600728</id>
	<title>Re:Super Phone? Aw, come on.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269457020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed. Today's supercomputer is tomorrow's soft drink can.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
Today 's supercomputer is tomorrow 's soft drink can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
Today's supercomputer is tomorrow's soft drink can.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600256</id>
	<title>Eh</title>
	<author>teknopurge</author>
	<datestamp>1269455280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Slower than a Cray.  Less storage than a ZFS SAN.  Lame.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Slower than a Cray .
Less storage than a ZFS SAN .
Lame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slower than a Cray.
Less storage than a ZFS SAN.
Lame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602658</id>
	<title>Re:One flaw...</title>
	<author>owlstead</author>
	<datestamp>1269421200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just plug it into the USB plug provided by your television.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just plug it into the USB plug provided by your television .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just plug it into the USB plug provided by your television.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600252</id>
	<title>Re:It's a TELEPHONE</title>
	<author>bcong</author>
	<datestamp>1269455280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>No it's not.  If you'd like a mobile telephone I suggest a less capable model such as any of the cheaper motorola models, such as the <a href="http://nextelonline.nextel.com/NASApp/onlinestore/en/Action/DisplayPhones?phoneSKU=I776" title="nextel.com" rel="nofollow">i776</a> [nextel.com].  If you are looking for a PDA or mobile media center which happens to also have cellphone capabilities then this is probably for you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No it 's not .
If you 'd like a mobile telephone I suggest a less capable model such as any of the cheaper motorola models , such as the i776 [ nextel.com ] .
If you are looking for a PDA or mobile media center which happens to also have cellphone capabilities then this is probably for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No it's not.
If you'd like a mobile telephone I suggest a less capable model such as any of the cheaper motorola models, such as the i776 [nextel.com].
If you are looking for a PDA or mobile media center which happens to also have cellphone capabilities then this is probably for you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602292</id>
	<title>Re:Super Phone? Aw, come on.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269463020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are you jealous your favorite toy (iphone) is not so super after all?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you jealous your favorite toy ( iphone ) is not so super after all ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you jealous your favorite toy (iphone) is not so super after all?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599968</id>
	<title>Re:HDMI jack?</title>
	<author>Dracos</author>
	<datestamp>1269454260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This was my first thought also.  Why bother keeping the analog hole closed on video that the user owns?  HDMI is no person's friend.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This was my first thought also .
Why bother keeping the analog hole closed on video that the user owns ?
HDMI is no person 's friend .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was my first thought also.
Why bother keeping the analog hole closed on video that the user owns?
HDMI is no person's friend.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600002</id>
	<title>Re:HDMI jack?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269454380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry, I guess they should have included an Apple proprietary jack 2.0 to make it seem more cool!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , I guess they should have included an Apple proprietary jack 2.0 to make it seem more cool !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, I guess they should have included an Apple proprietary jack 2.0 to make it seem more cool!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599954</id>
	<title>important features?</title>
	<author>bl8n8r</author>
	<datestamp>1269454200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How bout battery life?  It's great having all that power, but if it only stays running 6 hours between charges it's just a desk brick.  No mention of multi-touch/tasking?  itards will be whining for that if you're trying to horn into the apple market.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How bout battery life ?
It 's great having all that power , but if it only stays running 6 hours between charges it 's just a desk brick .
No mention of multi-touch/tasking ?
itards will be whining for that if you 're trying to horn into the apple market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How bout battery life?
It's great having all that power, but if it only stays running 6 hours between charges it's just a desk brick.
No mention of multi-touch/tasking?
itards will be whining for that if you're trying to horn into the apple market.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31606218</id>
	<title>Cynical Slashdot crowd..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269440100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, it's just a phone..<br>But it is a very capable one, that could offer a LOT of households (especially by end of year) a way to reduce their bills for internet (via the mifi) if they are already a Sprint consumer in a large market.<br>Beyond that it really is a nice piece of tech worthy of some praise.. not only does it take the antiquated sprint market to the forefront for current us phone tech (for now), but it is running Android, offers a front facing cam (first for a flagship mainstream phone in our market), and HD every which way..</p><p>This is supposed to be a geek site, this is a geek's dream... when the hell did you all get so damn jaded?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , it 's just a phone..But it is a very capable one , that could offer a LOT of households ( especially by end of year ) a way to reduce their bills for internet ( via the mifi ) if they are already a Sprint consumer in a large market.Beyond that it really is a nice piece of tech worthy of some praise.. not only does it take the antiquated sprint market to the forefront for current us phone tech ( for now ) , but it is running Android , offers a front facing cam ( first for a flagship mainstream phone in our market ) , and HD every which way..This is supposed to be a geek site , this is a geek 's dream... when the hell did you all get so damn jaded ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, it's just a phone..But it is a very capable one, that could offer a LOT of households (especially by end of year) a way to reduce their bills for internet (via the mifi) if they are already a Sprint consumer in a large market.Beyond that it really is a nice piece of tech worthy of some praise.. not only does it take the antiquated sprint market to the forefront for current us phone tech (for now), but it is running Android, offers a front facing cam (first for a flagship mainstream phone in our market), and HD every which way..This is supposed to be a geek site, this is a geek's dream... when the hell did you all get so damn jaded?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172</id>
	<title>The *best* feature:</title>
	<author>ThreeGigs</author>
	<datestamp>1269454980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FTA:</p><p>"It works as a Wi-Fi hotspot, supporting up to 8 devices;"</p><p>Wow! That's insane, considering that laptop wireless sharing is only now just becoming mainstream.</p><p>How many people will buy this phone, and ditch dsl, cable, etc? Smaller than any dsl or cable box, uses less power too I'd bet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FTA : " It works as a Wi-Fi hotspot , supporting up to 8 devices ; " Wow !
That 's insane , considering that laptop wireless sharing is only now just becoming mainstream.How many people will buy this phone , and ditch dsl , cable , etc ?
Smaller than any dsl or cable box , uses less power too I 'd bet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTA:"It works as a Wi-Fi hotspot, supporting up to 8 devices;"Wow!
That's insane, considering that laptop wireless sharing is only now just becoming mainstream.How many people will buy this phone, and ditch dsl, cable, etc?
Smaller than any dsl or cable box, uses less power too I'd bet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600418</id>
	<title>This is what the Instinct HD should have been</title>
	<author>Isaac-Lew</author>
	<datestamp>1269456000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At the least, the Instinct HD should have been Android-based. Thankfully, I'm eligible for a new phone in October, the HTC Evo is at the top of my list.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At the least , the Instinct HD should have been Android-based .
Thankfully , I 'm eligible for a new phone in October , the HTC Evo is at the top of my list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At the least, the Instinct HD should have been Android-based.
Thankfully, I'm eligible for a new phone in October, the HTC Evo is at the top of my list.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601576</id>
	<title>Re:Two very important points missing:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269460200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Car analogy (you know you wanted one): That's like walking into the Ferrari dealership expecting to figure out if you can afford the Ferrari 599 GTB after you ask "how much does it cost?" and then asking "and how's the fuel economy?"</p><p>Hmmm.... And I wouldn't condone <a href="http://www.edmunds.com/dealerships/Ferrari/index.html" title="edmunds.com" rel="nofollow">looking up your local Ferrari dealer</a> [edmunds.com] just so you could go in the store and do exactly that. That would be childish. Don't. No, really.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Car analogy ( you know you wanted one ) : That 's like walking into the Ferrari dealership expecting to figure out if you can afford the Ferrari 599 GTB after you ask " how much does it cost ?
" and then asking " and how 's the fuel economy ? " Hmmm... .
And I would n't condone looking up your local Ferrari dealer [ edmunds.com ] just so you could go in the store and do exactly that .
That would be childish .
Do n't. No , really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Car analogy (you know you wanted one): That's like walking into the Ferrari dealership expecting to figure out if you can afford the Ferrari 599 GTB after you ask "how much does it cost?
" and then asking "and how's the fuel economy?"Hmmm....
And I wouldn't condone looking up your local Ferrari dealer [edmunds.com] just so you could go in the store and do exactly that.
That would be childish.
Don't. No, really.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599974</id>
	<title>Amazing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269454260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I, for one, welcome our new HD Video Recording, 720p over HDMI, kick stand in the back, 4+" screen, snapdragon processor having, 4G blazing, media center staple overlords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I , for one , welcome our new HD Video Recording , 720p over HDMI , kick stand in the back , 4 + " screen , snapdragon processor having , 4G blazing , media center staple overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, for one, welcome our new HD Video Recording, 720p over HDMI, kick stand in the back, 4+" screen, snapdragon processor having, 4G blazing, media center staple overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080</id>
	<title>It's a TELEPHONE</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269454620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>1-GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon QSD8650 chipset<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... 1GB of built-in memory<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... 512MB of RAM<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... 8-megapixel camera on the back<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... 1.3-megapixel unit on the front<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... also records 720p, high-def video, which it can play through an HDMI out jack on the bottom.</p></div><p>Sounds like every geeks wet dream. And yet I can't help but think to myself<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... this is a <i>telephone</i>. This is device whose primary purpose is to facilitate <i>verbal communication</i>.</p><p> <a href="http://xkcd.com/662/" title="xkcd.com" rel="nofollow">Oblig: </a> [xkcd.com]  "What if I want something more than the pale facsilime of fulfillment brought by a paradise of ever-fancier toys?"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>1-GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon QSD8650 chipset ... 1GB of built-in memory ... 512MB of RAM ... 8-megapixel camera on the back ... 1.3-megapixel unit on the front ... also records 720p , high-def video , which it can play through an HDMI out jack on the bottom.Sounds like every geeks wet dream .
And yet I ca n't help but think to myself ... this is a telephone .
This is device whose primary purpose is to facilitate verbal communication .
Oblig : [ xkcd.com ] " What if I want something more than the pale facsilime of fulfillment brought by a paradise of ever-fancier toys ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1-GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon QSD8650 chipset ... 1GB of built-in memory ... 512MB of RAM ... 8-megapixel camera on the back ... 1.3-megapixel unit on the front ... also records 720p, high-def video, which it can play through an HDMI out jack on the bottom.Sounds like every geeks wet dream.
And yet I can't help but think to myself ... this is a telephone.
This is device whose primary purpose is to facilitate verbal communication.
Oblig:  [xkcd.com]  "What if I want something more than the pale facsilime of fulfillment brought by a paradise of ever-fancier toys?
"
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600326</id>
	<title>Re:Voice?</title>
	<author>NonUniqueNickname</author>
	<datestamp>1269455640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Does this apply to calls as well as data?</p></div><p>From TFA: "it will make all voice calls over Sprint's CDMA 1X network". So no.<br>
Probably no simultaneous voice and data either, as is generally the case with Sprint.<br>
Probably won't work as a phone outside the USA because it's not GSM.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this apply to calls as well as data ? From TFA : " it will make all voice calls over Sprint 's CDMA 1X network " .
So no .
Probably no simultaneous voice and data either , as is generally the case with Sprint .
Probably wo n't work as a phone outside the USA because it 's not GSM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this apply to calls as well as data?From TFA: "it will make all voice calls over Sprint's CDMA 1X network".
So no.
Probably no simultaneous voice and data either, as is generally the case with Sprint.
Probably won't work as a phone outside the USA because it's not GSM.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602438</id>
	<title>Re:Also..</title>
	<author>IorDMUX</author>
	<datestamp>1269463560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>As a member of Qualcomm's power-management IC engineering team, (and hoping I do not sound like a total shill,) I'd like to point out that battery life and power efficiency is one of the big selling points of the Snapdragon.  As opposed to the Intel Atom, which was designed by a desktop/server CPU company, at Qualcomm we're is coming from a background of years of low-power mobile device design.  <br> <br>Hopefully (though I can't say for certain as full specs have not yet been released), HTC also used our power management platform this time, rather than the third-party, battery-gulping solution they installed on their G1's.  That was an embarrassment.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a member of Qualcomm 's power-management IC engineering team , ( and hoping I do not sound like a total shill , ) I 'd like to point out that battery life and power efficiency is one of the big selling points of the Snapdragon .
As opposed to the Intel Atom , which was designed by a desktop/server CPU company , at Qualcomm we 're is coming from a background of years of low-power mobile device design .
Hopefully ( though I ca n't say for certain as full specs have not yet been released ) , HTC also used our power management platform this time , rather than the third-party , battery-gulping solution they installed on their G1 's .
That was an embarrassment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a member of Qualcomm's power-management IC engineering team, (and hoping I do not sound like a total shill,) I'd like to point out that battery life and power efficiency is one of the big selling points of the Snapdragon.
As opposed to the Intel Atom, which was designed by a desktop/server CPU company, at Qualcomm we're is coming from a background of years of low-power mobile device design.
Hopefully (though I can't say for certain as full specs have not yet been released), HTC also used our power management platform this time, rather than the third-party, battery-gulping solution they installed on their G1's.
That was an embarrassment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600666</id>
	<title>Re:can you install more than 5 apps to it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269456780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How are Android apps crippled?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How are Android apps crippled ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How are Android apps crippled?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600294</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601528</id>
	<title>Re:HDMI jack?</title>
	<author>shoehornjob</author>
	<datestamp>1269460020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly. I'm always skeptical when they pack stuff like this into phones etc. You figure they have to cut corners somewhere right. Personally I think the engineers should tell the marketing department to stfu.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
I 'm always skeptical when they pack stuff like this into phones etc .
You figure they have to cut corners somewhere right .
Personally I think the engineers should tell the marketing department to stfu .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
I'm always skeptical when they pack stuff like this into phones etc.
You figure they have to cut corners somewhere right.
Personally I think the engineers should tell the marketing department to stfu.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602164</id>
	<title>Re:The *best* feature:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269462480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm on Sprint with the HTC Hero.  Great android device, but Sprint saw fit to disable the ability to tether, leaving us with the choice of 1) use 3rd party solution (pdanet) or 2) root the phone.</p><p>Wonder how they'll cripple this one?  I doubt sincerely they'll let you use the phone to do wifi tether to 3g, given their current reluctance to even allow 1 device to tether currently.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm on Sprint with the HTC Hero .
Great android device , but Sprint saw fit to disable the ability to tether , leaving us with the choice of 1 ) use 3rd party solution ( pdanet ) or 2 ) root the phone.Wonder how they 'll cripple this one ?
I doubt sincerely they 'll let you use the phone to do wifi tether to 3g , given their current reluctance to even allow 1 device to tether currently .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm on Sprint with the HTC Hero.
Great android device, but Sprint saw fit to disable the ability to tether, leaving us with the choice of 1) use 3rd party solution (pdanet) or 2) root the phone.Wonder how they'll cripple this one?
I doubt sincerely they'll let you use the phone to do wifi tether to 3g, given their current reluctance to even allow 1 device to tether currently.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600810</id>
	<title>Re:Memory or storage?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269457440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Memory and storage are synonyms.  I'm not sure what your TLA (three letter acronym) means though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Memory and storage are synonyms .
I 'm not sure what your TLA ( three letter acronym ) means though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Memory and storage are synonyms.
I'm not sure what your TLA (three letter acronym) means though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600972</id>
	<title>Re:Also..</title>
	<author>confused one</author>
	<datestamp>1269458040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or you could do what we did 20 years ago to make our HAM gear portable -- drag around a couple lead-acid gel-cell batteries in a backpack.  That'll get you a couple hours talk time!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or you could do what we did 20 years ago to make our HAM gear portable -- drag around a couple lead-acid gel-cell batteries in a backpack .
That 'll get you a couple hours talk time !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or you could do what we did 20 years ago to make our HAM gear portable -- drag around a couple lead-acid gel-cell batteries in a backpack.
That'll get you a couple hours talk time!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599984</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600480
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603548
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31608574
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31608564
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600376
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31607382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600346
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31605216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600364
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31660878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599976
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31604782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31604688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31619410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602658
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601528
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31604376
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31604906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31615328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31606810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600270
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31604816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601166
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_1539220_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600886
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601632
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31605216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31604688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602164
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600490
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602866
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603344
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600256
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600662
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603720
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600294
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600666
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601398
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31604816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600326
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603948
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599974
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599984
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602878
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31615328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602756
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599962
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600810
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603152
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602658
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600724
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602382
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31604906
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31606810
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603088
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31608564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599968
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31607382
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600480
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600160
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31604782
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600242
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600416
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602628
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602640
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31608574
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600434
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601442
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602028
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599844
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601152
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31660878
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600080
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600270
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600364
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600376
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600640
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601630
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601136
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603052
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31619410
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31604376
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600000
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600566
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600482
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600012
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31599976
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31601670
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_1539220.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31600230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31602994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_1539220.31603170
</commentlist>
</conversation>
