<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_24_0625211</id>
	<title>Commodore 64 Primed For a Comeback In June</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1269432540000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.goodgearguide.com.au/" rel="nofollow">angry tapir</a> writes <i>"The Commodore 64 is getting a makeover, with a new design and some of the latest computing technologies, as the brand gets <a href="http://www.arnnet.com.au/article/340148/commodore\_64\_awakes\_from\_slumber\_makeover/?fp=4194304&amp;fpid=1">primed for a comeback</a>. The revamped computer will be available through the Commodore USA online store, which is set to open June 1. The computer will be an all-in-one keyboard, with Intel's 64-bit quad-core microprocessors and 3D graphics capabilities."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>angry tapir writes " The Commodore 64 is getting a makeover , with a new design and some of the latest computing technologies , as the brand gets primed for a comeback .
The revamped computer will be available through the Commodore USA online store , which is set to open June 1 .
The computer will be an all-in-one keyboard , with Intel 's 64-bit quad-core microprocessors and 3D graphics capabilities .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>angry tapir writes "The Commodore 64 is getting a makeover, with a new design and some of the latest computing technologies, as the brand gets primed for a comeback.
The revamped computer will be available through the Commodore USA online store, which is set to open June 1.
The computer will be an all-in-one keyboard, with Intel's 64-bit quad-core microprocessors and 3D graphics capabilities.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596226</id>
	<title>Re:Clear Hoax</title>
	<author>XiX36</author>
	<datestamp>1269438000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am suspicious as well, the built-in keyboard has windows keys.  If it is being marketed as a machine to run multiple OS's, why not put the old C= symbol on those keys.  Since they are using the name, why not use the logo as well?  It's a minor point, but if this is real and they are resurrecting the name to appeal to those of us who remember messing around with Commodores then details like that might matter a bit.  Certainly anyone who remembers playing around with basic on the livingroom tv could figure out that the C= key functions as a windows button.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am suspicious as well , the built-in keyboard has windows keys .
If it is being marketed as a machine to run multiple OS 's , why not put the old C = symbol on those keys .
Since they are using the name , why not use the logo as well ?
It 's a minor point , but if this is real and they are resurrecting the name to appeal to those of us who remember messing around with Commodores then details like that might matter a bit .
Certainly anyone who remembers playing around with basic on the livingroom tv could figure out that the C = key functions as a windows button .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am suspicious as well, the built-in keyboard has windows keys.
If it is being marketed as a machine to run multiple OS's, why not put the old C= symbol on those keys.
Since they are using the name, why not use the logo as well?
It's a minor point, but if this is real and they are resurrecting the name to appeal to those of us who remember messing around with Commodores then details like that might matter a bit.
Certainly anyone who remembers playing around with basic on the livingroom tv could figure out that the C= key functions as a windows button.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597300</id>
	<title>Re:Clear Hoax</title>
	<author>Orion Blastar</author>
	<datestamp>1269444300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Made in China?</p><p>"They took our jobs!"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Made in China ?
" They took our jobs !
" : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Made in China?
"They took our jobs!
" :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597998</id>
	<title>That's all well and good, but...</title>
	<author>DragonTHC</author>
	<datestamp>1269447120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will it run moon patrol?  or lunar lander?  Or Lode Runner, or manic miner, or even zork?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it run moon patrol ?
or lunar lander ?
Or Lode Runner , or manic miner , or even zork ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it run moon patrol?
or lunar lander?
Or Lode Runner, or manic miner, or even zork?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596932</id>
	<title>Re:I already have one</title>
	<author>dzfoo</author>
	<datestamp>1269442560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's nothing, I just put an Apple sticker on my C=64 and now it's a Mac.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; -dZ.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's nothing , I just put an Apple sticker on my C = 64 and now it 's a Mac .
      -dZ .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's nothing, I just put an Apple sticker on my C=64 and now it's a Mac.
      -dZ.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596384</id>
	<title>Another nerd joke ruined forever!</title>
	<author>boneglorious</author>
	<datestamp>1269439260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If this is true, no one will ever laugh again when I shake my head sadly and reminisce over that old C64 I grew up with. They'll be like, "Yeah, and I have an iPhone. What's your point, Grandpa?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>If this is true , no one will ever laugh again when I shake my head sadly and reminisce over that old C64 I grew up with .
They 'll be like , " Yeah , and I have an iPhone .
What 's your point , Grandpa ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this is true, no one will ever laugh again when I shake my head sadly and reminisce over that old C64 I grew up with.
They'll be like, "Yeah, and I have an iPhone.
What's your point, Grandpa?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596164</id>
	<title>Re:Clear Hoax</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269437640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>10 PRINT CHR$(147)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>10 PRINT CHR $ ( 147 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>10 PRINT CHR$(147)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597740</id>
	<title>Web site needs major overhaul...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269446100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Their Web site looks like it was developed by my 11-year old daughter. They had better work on that if they want people to take them seriously.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Their Web site looks like it was developed by my 11-year old daughter .
They had better work on that if they want people to take them seriously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their Web site looks like it was developed by my 11-year old daughter.
They had better work on that if they want people to take them seriously.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31599660</id>
	<title>What about SID?</title>
	<author>istartedi</author>
	<datestamp>1269453120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At the very least, they could put a SID chip
in there, in addition to a modern sound card.  They could also support hundreds of
virtual instances of the original C64 on such
a machine.  They could load it with all the original
ROMs too, including BASIC.</p><p>Genuine SID sound would really rock though.
I understand there are some SID clones being made.
The original vintage chips are available too, they
could put those in a "special edition" and charge
more.</p><p>For those not aware, the SID chip made the sounds
 on the C64.  It was a digital-analog hybrid, and thus
has some unique qualities.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At the very least , they could put a SID chip in there , in addition to a modern sound card .
They could also support hundreds of virtual instances of the original C64 on such a machine .
They could load it with all the original ROMs too , including BASIC.Genuine SID sound would really rock though .
I understand there are some SID clones being made .
The original vintage chips are available too , they could put those in a " special edition " and charge more.For those not aware , the SID chip made the sounds on the C64 .
It was a digital-analog hybrid , and thus has some unique qualities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At the very least, they could put a SID chip
in there, in addition to a modern sound card.
They could also support hundreds of
virtual instances of the original C64 on such
a machine.
They could load it with all the original
ROMs too, including BASIC.Genuine SID sound would really rock though.
I understand there are some SID clones being made.
The original vintage chips are available too, they
could put those in a "special edition" and charge
more.For those not aware, the SID chip made the sounds
 on the C64.
It was a digital-analog hybrid, and thus
has some unique qualities.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600188</id>
	<title>Re:Why not Commodore 65</title>
	<author>flahwho</author>
	<datestamp>1269455040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because there was the C128!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because there was the C128 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because there was the C128!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596198</id>
	<title>Nope, not a commodore</title>
	<author>damn\_registrars</author>
	<datestamp>1269437820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>If it doesn't boot to BASIC, and require <p><div class="quote"><p>load "*",8,1</p></div><p>to start software, it isn't commodore 64.  Case closed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it does n't boot to BASIC , and require load " * " ,8,1to start software , it is n't commodore 64 .
Case closed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it doesn't boot to BASIC, and require load "*",8,1to start software, it isn't commodore 64.
Case closed.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596076</id>
	<title>HDTVs with VGA input</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1269437220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>At least if it had come with a HDMI port to be by default attached to a HDTV, then it would be closer to the Commodre 64 legacy.</p></div><p>Almost any PC since 1987 can be connected to a TV because most HDTVs sold where I live have a VGA input. But the original C64 also competed with the NES as a game console; how will the new C64 compete with the Xbox 360?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least if it had come with a HDMI port to be by default attached to a HDTV , then it would be closer to the Commodre 64 legacy.Almost any PC since 1987 can be connected to a TV because most HDTVs sold where I live have a VGA input .
But the original C64 also competed with the NES as a game console ; how will the new C64 compete with the Xbox 360 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least if it had come with a HDMI port to be by default attached to a HDTV, then it would be closer to the Commodre 64 legacy.Almost any PC since 1987 can be connected to a TV because most HDTVs sold where I live have a VGA input.
But the original C64 also competed with the NES as a game console; how will the new C64 compete with the Xbox 360?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595984</id>
	<title>Riding the back of nostalgia.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269436680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure, the C64 was a fantastic machine in its time. But that was the 1980s. Commodore hasn't been in the public consciousness for nearly two decades (the last Amigas from Commodore - the 1200 and 4000T - ceased production in 1996, if Wikipedia can be trusted). They're planning an all-in-one keyboard computer, just like the original C64, and I can pretty much guarantee: it'll flop. The design had good reason back in the 80s, but not so much now - they're banking upon the name driving sales, but I suspect a lot of people will look at it and discount it for that same reason.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , the C64 was a fantastic machine in its time .
But that was the 1980s .
Commodore has n't been in the public consciousness for nearly two decades ( the last Amigas from Commodore - the 1200 and 4000T - ceased production in 1996 , if Wikipedia can be trusted ) .
They 're planning an all-in-one keyboard computer , just like the original C64 , and I can pretty much guarantee : it 'll flop .
The design had good reason back in the 80s , but not so much now - they 're banking upon the name driving sales , but I suspect a lot of people will look at it and discount it for that same reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, the C64 was a fantastic machine in its time.
But that was the 1980s.
Commodore hasn't been in the public consciousness for nearly two decades (the last Amigas from Commodore - the 1200 and 4000T - ceased production in 1996, if Wikipedia can be trusted).
They're planning an all-in-one keyboard computer, just like the original C64, and I can pretty much guarantee: it'll flop.
The design had good reason back in the 80s, but not so much now - they're banking upon the name driving sales, but I suspect a lot of people will look at it and discount it for that same reason.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596174</id>
	<title>The C64, an eulogy</title>
	<author>zr-rifle</author>
	<datestamp>1269437700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since it will be some time before I get to see the good old C64 mentioned on the Slashdot first page, I'd like to say that Jack Tramiel is the unsung hero of the personal computer, even more than Steve Jobs in this regard. He advocated a computer 'for the classes, not for the masses'. By driving down the retail price and selling the C64 in toy stores and Walmart, he created a broader market and introduced a lot of low-to-middle class kids, who could not afford the Apple II or the Macintosh, to the joys of computing.<br> <br>By sparking the low-cost microcomputer revolution of the eighties, he prepared a whole generation to the modern digital age.<br> <br> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack\_Tramiel" title="wikipedia.org">Jack Tramiel's Wikipedia entry.</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since it will be some time before I get to see the good old C64 mentioned on the Slashdot first page , I 'd like to say that Jack Tramiel is the unsung hero of the personal computer , even more than Steve Jobs in this regard .
He advocated a computer 'for the classes , not for the masses' .
By driving down the retail price and selling the C64 in toy stores and Walmart , he created a broader market and introduced a lot of low-to-middle class kids , who could not afford the Apple II or the Macintosh , to the joys of computing .
By sparking the low-cost microcomputer revolution of the eighties , he prepared a whole generation to the modern digital age .
Jack Tramiel 's Wikipedia entry .
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since it will be some time before I get to see the good old C64 mentioned on the Slashdot first page, I'd like to say that Jack Tramiel is the unsung hero of the personal computer, even more than Steve Jobs in this regard.
He advocated a computer 'for the classes, not for the masses'.
By driving down the retail price and selling the C64 in toy stores and Walmart, he created a broader market and introduced a lot of low-to-middle class kids, who could not afford the Apple II or the Macintosh, to the joys of computing.
By sparking the low-cost microcomputer revolution of the eighties, he prepared a whole generation to the modern digital age.
Jack Tramiel's Wikipedia entry.
[wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596024</id>
	<title>A computer of rank!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269436920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looks like the new commodore is a computer of rank, as it's been through major revisions in general. I wonder what kernel it will incorporalte.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like the new commodore is a computer of rank , as it 's been through major revisions in general .
I wonder what kernel it will incorporalte .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like the new commodore is a computer of rank, as it's been through major revisions in general.
I wonder what kernel it will incorporalte.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597332</id>
	<title>Re:Clear Hoax</title>
	<author>crossmr</author>
	<datestamp>1269444420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>apparently timothy is picking up kdawson's slack.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>apparently timothy is picking up kdawson 's slack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>apparently timothy is picking up kdawson's slack.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597692</id>
	<title>Only the intermediary speaks about C64</title>
	<author>gwolf</author>
	<datestamp>1269445920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...And with little to no knowledge about it -- Yes, I RTFA. Among the jewels:</p><blockquote><div><p>During the same panel, Apple co-founders Steve Wozniak and Steve Jobs approached Commodore with an Apple II prototype, which was much more advanced in color, graphics, sound and games. Apple at the time didn't have the money to make and sell the Apple II, and was hoping Commodore would push the design to market. Commodore, however, preferred to develop the Commodore 64 as a simpler, lower-cost, black-and-white-only machine.</p></div></blockquote><p>I have no insight on the Steves' attempt... But if you say the C64 was <em>black-and-white-only machine</em>, it means you have never been close to one -- Its graphic capabilities were at least up to par with Apple ]['s. And its sound was <em>incredibly</em> better.</p><p>Oh, and if from TFA you go to <a href="http://www.commodoreusa.net/" title="commodoreusa.net">the company's website</a> [commodoreusa.net], you will see something that is way closer to an Amiga descendent than a C64 descendent (<a href="http://www.commodoreusa.net/os.html" title="commodoreusa.net">two of their available operating systems</a> [commodoreusa.net] are Amiga-relted -- AmigaOS and AROS). Of course, the machine is neither a C64 nor an Amiga.</p><p>It's almost as saying I have a Xerox PARC at my desktop only because it has a mouse and sorta-windows.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...And with little to no knowledge about it -- Yes , I RTFA .
Among the jewels : During the same panel , Apple co-founders Steve Wozniak and Steve Jobs approached Commodore with an Apple II prototype , which was much more advanced in color , graphics , sound and games .
Apple at the time did n't have the money to make and sell the Apple II , and was hoping Commodore would push the design to market .
Commodore , however , preferred to develop the Commodore 64 as a simpler , lower-cost , black-and-white-only machine.I have no insight on the Steves ' attempt... But if you say the C64 was black-and-white-only machine , it means you have never been close to one -- Its graphic capabilities were at least up to par with Apple ] [ 's .
And its sound was incredibly better.Oh , and if from TFA you go to the company 's website [ commodoreusa.net ] , you will see something that is way closer to an Amiga descendent than a C64 descendent ( two of their available operating systems [ commodoreusa.net ] are Amiga-relted -- AmigaOS and AROS ) .
Of course , the machine is neither a C64 nor an Amiga.It 's almost as saying I have a Xerox PARC at my desktop only because it has a mouse and sorta-windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...And with little to no knowledge about it -- Yes, I RTFA.
Among the jewels:During the same panel, Apple co-founders Steve Wozniak and Steve Jobs approached Commodore with an Apple II prototype, which was much more advanced in color, graphics, sound and games.
Apple at the time didn't have the money to make and sell the Apple II, and was hoping Commodore would push the design to market.
Commodore, however, preferred to develop the Commodore 64 as a simpler, lower-cost, black-and-white-only machine.I have no insight on the Steves' attempt... But if you say the C64 was black-and-white-only machine, it means you have never been close to one -- Its graphic capabilities were at least up to par with Apple ]['s.
And its sound was incredibly better.Oh, and if from TFA you go to the company's website [commodoreusa.net], you will see something that is way closer to an Amiga descendent than a C64 descendent (two of their available operating systems [commodoreusa.net] are Amiga-relted -- AmigaOS and AROS).
Of course, the machine is neither a C64 nor an Amiga.It's almost as saying I have a Xerox PARC at my desktop only because it has a mouse and sorta-windows.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31598256</id>
	<title>Re:Upgrades?</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1269448080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>All the upgrade inconvenience of a laptop with none of the advantages.</p></div></blockquote><p>If it turns out that this C64 + a large monitor is cheaper and a large screen laptop, that could be a huge advantage and potentially popular among the people who buy laptops because they're more compact than desktops.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>All the upgrade inconvenience of a laptop with none of the advantages.If it turns out that this C64 + a large monitor is cheaper and a large screen laptop , that could be a huge advantage and potentially popular among the people who buy laptops because they 're more compact than desktops .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the upgrade inconvenience of a laptop with none of the advantages.If it turns out that this C64 + a large monitor is cheaper and a large screen laptop, that could be a huge advantage and potentially popular among the people who buy laptops because they're more compact than desktops.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596038</id>
	<title>She's a brick... HOUSE!</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1269437040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is a Commodore in name only.</p></div><p>So was the Commodore 64; it wasn't even endorsed by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodores" title="wikipedia.org">Lionel Richie</a> [wikipedia.org].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a Commodore in name only.So was the Commodore 64 ; it was n't even endorsed by Lionel Richie [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a Commodore in name only.So was the Commodore 64; it wasn't even endorsed by Lionel Richie [wikipedia.org].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31599140</id>
	<title>Shouldn't that be...</title>
	<author>whitroth</author>
	<datestamp>1269451200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... a Commodore 256? I mean, 64 bit x 4 cores....</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; mark</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... a Commodore 256 ?
I mean , 64 bit x 4 cores... .                       mark</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... a Commodore 256?
I mean, 64 bit x 4 cores....
                      mark</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31598354</id>
	<title>whatever happened?</title>
	<author>Necroloth</author>
	<datestamp>1269448500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I saw this, I thought it was Commodore relaunching <i>again</i> - the ones that had lots of designed cases (C-Kin) but priced high like alienware. What happened to them? I had several designs on there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I saw this , I thought it was Commodore relaunching again - the ones that had lots of designed cases ( C-Kin ) but priced high like alienware .
What happened to them ?
I had several designs on there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I saw this, I thought it was Commodore relaunching again - the ones that had lots of designed cases (C-Kin) but priced high like alienware.
What happened to them?
I had several designs on there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597814</id>
	<title>Re:64-bit?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269446460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But wait, didn't the "64" stand for the number of bits??? This can't be a hoax...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But wait , did n't the " 64 " stand for the number of bits ? ? ?
This ca n't be a hoax... : -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But wait, didn't the "64" stand for the number of bits???
This can't be a hoax... :-P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596088</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595974</id>
	<title>Yawn</title>
	<author>jawtheshark</author>
	<datestamp>1269436620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Intel's 64-bit quad-core microprocessors [...]  500GB of hard drive storage and 4GB of RAM. Also included are a DVD-RW drive, a touchpad, four USB ports, a Gigabit Ethernet port and a DVI</p></div></blockquote><p>and</p><blockquote><div><p>The PC will run the Linux, Windows and Mac OS X operating systems.</p></div></blockquote><p>So, it's laptop computer without a screen intended to be attached to a normal computer screen.  Apart from form factor (an even then - many computers of the C64 era had this form factor) this has nothing to do with Commodore 64.  It's just a PC like an other one on the market.  At least if it had come with a HDMI port to be by default attached to a HDTV, then it would be closer to the Commodre 64 legacy.</p><p>Also... "Will run Mac OS X"... Definitely not legally....</p><p>All in all: Meh!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Intel 's 64-bit quad-core microprocessors [ ... ] 500GB of hard drive storage and 4GB of RAM .
Also included are a DVD-RW drive , a touchpad , four USB ports , a Gigabit Ethernet port and a DVIandThe PC will run the Linux , Windows and Mac OS X operating systems.So , it 's laptop computer without a screen intended to be attached to a normal computer screen .
Apart from form factor ( an even then - many computers of the C64 era had this form factor ) this has nothing to do with Commodore 64 .
It 's just a PC like an other one on the market .
At least if it had come with a HDMI port to be by default attached to a HDTV , then it would be closer to the Commodre 64 legacy.Also... " Will run Mac OS X " ... Definitely not legally....All in all : Meh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Intel's 64-bit quad-core microprocessors [...]  500GB of hard drive storage and 4GB of RAM.
Also included are a DVD-RW drive, a touchpad, four USB ports, a Gigabit Ethernet port and a DVIandThe PC will run the Linux, Windows and Mac OS X operating systems.So, it's laptop computer without a screen intended to be attached to a normal computer screen.
Apart from form factor (an even then - many computers of the C64 era had this form factor) this has nothing to do with Commodore 64.
It's just a PC like an other one on the market.
At least if it had come with a HDMI port to be by default attached to a HDTV, then it would be closer to the Commodre 64 legacy.Also... "Will run Mac OS X"... Definitely not legally....All in all: Meh!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600980</id>
	<title>Ports</title>
	<author>Dan East</author>
	<datestamp>1269458040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this thing for real?  Why does it have a parallel port, 2 serial ports, PS/2 connectors, DVI output, S-Video output, and a CF reader?  These ports date this thing back at <i>least</i> 5 years.</p><p>The hardware is actually rather cheap looking, especially when viewed from the sides.  The case looks like cheap plastic with a poor finish.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this thing for real ?
Why does it have a parallel port , 2 serial ports , PS/2 connectors , DVI output , S-Video output , and a CF reader ?
These ports date this thing back at least 5 years.The hardware is actually rather cheap looking , especially when viewed from the sides .
The case looks like cheap plastic with a poor finish .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this thing for real?
Why does it have a parallel port, 2 serial ports, PS/2 connectors, DVI output, S-Video output, and a CF reader?
These ports date this thing back at least 5 years.The hardware is actually rather cheap looking, especially when viewed from the sides.
The case looks like cheap plastic with a poor finish.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31598330</id>
	<title>Re:Pick your OS flavor?</title>
	<author>Emmeau</author>
	<datestamp>1269448380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But will it run GEOS? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEOS\_\%288-bit\_operating\_system\%29)</htmltext>
<tokenext>But will it run GEOS ?
( http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEOS \ _ \ % 288-bit \ _operating \ _system \ % 29 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But will it run GEOS?
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEOS\_\%288-bit\_operating\_system\%29)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31609642</id>
	<title>Will this be like the return of</title>
	<author>Compaqt</author>
	<datestamp>1269527280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=knight+rider+2008" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">KITT</a> [google.com]?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>KITT [ google.com ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>KITT [google.com]?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31598902</id>
	<title>Not hoax, but rebranding of existing product.</title>
	<author>Ch\_Omega</author>
	<datestamp>1269450240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, I'm pretty sure it's the exact same product as the <a href="http://www.cybernetman.com/en/products/zero-footprint-pc/" title="cybernetman.com">Zero Footprint PC</a> [cybernetman.com], exept, maybe they put a Commodore C= Sticker on it, and market it as a new Commodore 64. <br> <br>Seriously, compare these two pictures: <a href="http://www.cybernetman.com/images/pop\_images/zpc-9100\_overall.jpg" title="cybernetman.com">Zero Footprint PC</a> [cybernetman.com] and <a href="http://www.commodoreusa.net/i//9100\_2-1.jpg" title="commodoreusa.net">"new" Commodore 64</a> [commodoreusa.net]. Looks similar?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I 'm pretty sure it 's the exact same product as the Zero Footprint PC [ cybernetman.com ] , exept , maybe they put a Commodore C = Sticker on it , and market it as a new Commodore 64 .
Seriously , compare these two pictures : Zero Footprint PC [ cybernetman.com ] and " new " Commodore 64 [ commodoreusa.net ] .
Looks similar ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I'm pretty sure it's the exact same product as the Zero Footprint PC [cybernetman.com], exept, maybe they put a Commodore C= Sticker on it, and market it as a new Commodore 64.
Seriously, compare these two pictures: Zero Footprint PC [cybernetman.com] and "new" Commodore 64 [commodoreusa.net].
Looks similar?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31598058</id>
	<title>chip?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269447360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"You think your Commodore 64 is pretty neato,<br>what kinda chip you got in there, a Dorito?"<br>
&nbsp; - Al Yankovic</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" You think your Commodore 64 is pretty neato,what kinda chip you got in there , a Dorito ?
"   - Al Yankovic</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"You think your Commodore 64 is pretty neato,what kinda chip you got in there, a Dorito?
"
  - Al Yankovic</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600834</id>
	<title>Re:Clear Hoax ??</title>
	<author>bwcbwc</author>
	<datestamp>1269457500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe not, after all the "Commodore USA store" "is set to open June1".  Could just be an alpha/prototype of the eventual site.</p><p>Still, as others have said, this is just another story of a Chinese manufacturer licensing a well-known brand name to slap onto their product. At least the product vaguely resembles what the original would have been if it were upgraded to modern hardware.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe not , after all the " Commodore USA store " " is set to open June1 " .
Could just be an alpha/prototype of the eventual site.Still , as others have said , this is just another story of a Chinese manufacturer licensing a well-known brand name to slap onto their product .
At least the product vaguely resembles what the original would have been if it were upgraded to modern hardware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe not, after all the "Commodore USA store" "is set to open June1".
Could just be an alpha/prototype of the eventual site.Still, as others have said, this is just another story of a Chinese manufacturer licensing a well-known brand name to slap onto their product.
At least the product vaguely resembles what the original would have been if it were upgraded to modern hardware.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596944</id>
	<title>Re:The C64, an eulogy</title>
	<author>gregthebunny</author>
	<datestamp>1269442620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>He advocated a computer 'for the classes, not for the masses'.</p><p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack\_Tramiel" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Jack Tramiel's Wikipedia entry.</a> [wikipedia.org] </p></div><p>Um... wiki article says:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It was during this time period that he coined the famous phrase, "<em>We need to build computers for the <b>masses</b>, not the <b>classes</b>.</em>"</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He advocated a computer 'for the classes , not for the masses' .
Jack Tramiel 's Wikipedia entry .
[ wikipedia.org ] Um... wiki article says : It was during this time period that he coined the famous phrase , " We need to build computers for the masses , not the classes .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He advocated a computer 'for the classes, not for the masses'.
Jack Tramiel's Wikipedia entry.
[wikipedia.org] Um... wiki article says:It was during this time period that he coined the famous phrase, "We need to build computers for the masses, not the classes.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596174</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597506</id>
	<title>No Cartridges</title>
	<author>Johnberg</author>
	<datestamp>1269445140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, not only will this thing not come loaded with C64 emulation software, it won't have the required Game Cartridge slot.  What a waste of a name licensing opportunity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , not only will this thing not come loaded with C64 emulation software , it wo n't have the required Game Cartridge slot .
What a waste of a name licensing opportunity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, not only will this thing not come loaded with C64 emulation software, it won't have the required Game Cartridge slot.
What a waste of a name licensing opportunity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596504</id>
	<title>Good luck slipping that kit...</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1269439920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>... into a ZX81 form factor.<br> <br>ALL HAIL CLIVE SINCLAIR!</htmltext>
<tokenext>... into a ZX81 form factor .
ALL HAIL CLIVE SINCLAIR !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... into a ZX81 form factor.
ALL HAIL CLIVE SINCLAIR!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597172</id>
	<title>Re:Riding the back of nostalgia.</title>
	<author>hot soldering iron</author>
	<datestamp>1269443820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The All-in-one style has a proper name: a laptop. This is a laptop without an lcd. And it's not portable. So it's not even a good laptop. Nice design, but not a good machine.</p><p>If you want the true feel of a 64 get the C64 Direct-to-TV (abbreviated C64DTV). It's a C64 emulated in a chip, with 30 games, embedded in a joystick. Plug it into your TV and play. There are also numerous emulators (free), and you may find someone that has an original in their attic.</p><p>The original C64 was, and still is, prized for it's music synth capabilities using the SID chip. Many of the remaining functional C64s have been turned into music synthesizers/sequencers (Prophet64, MSSIAH, others). It's still quite the hackable platform. I remember back in the day (late '80s) some guys developed their own cartridge firmware/network stack and were running 8 of them in a parallel cluster. Neat toy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The All-in-one style has a proper name : a laptop .
This is a laptop without an lcd .
And it 's not portable .
So it 's not even a good laptop .
Nice design , but not a good machine.If you want the true feel of a 64 get the C64 Direct-to-TV ( abbreviated C64DTV ) .
It 's a C64 emulated in a chip , with 30 games , embedded in a joystick .
Plug it into your TV and play .
There are also numerous emulators ( free ) , and you may find someone that has an original in their attic.The original C64 was , and still is , prized for it 's music synth capabilities using the SID chip .
Many of the remaining functional C64s have been turned into music synthesizers/sequencers ( Prophet64 , MSSIAH , others ) .
It 's still quite the hackable platform .
I remember back in the day ( late '80s ) some guys developed their own cartridge firmware/network stack and were running 8 of them in a parallel cluster .
Neat toy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The All-in-one style has a proper name: a laptop.
This is a laptop without an lcd.
And it's not portable.
So it's not even a good laptop.
Nice design, but not a good machine.If you want the true feel of a 64 get the C64 Direct-to-TV (abbreviated C64DTV).
It's a C64 emulated in a chip, with 30 games, embedded in a joystick.
Plug it into your TV and play.
There are also numerous emulators (free), and you may find someone that has an original in their attic.The original C64 was, and still is, prized for it's music synth capabilities using the SID chip.
Many of the remaining functional C64s have been turned into music synthesizers/sequencers (Prophet64, MSSIAH, others).
It's still quite the hackable platform.
I remember back in the day (late '80s) some guys developed their own cartridge firmware/network stack and were running 8 of them in a parallel cluster.
Neat toy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31599196</id>
	<title>Commodore BASIC</title>
	<author>OrangeTide</author>
	<datestamp>1269451380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, <a href="http://www.commodoreusa.net/catalog/item/7429988/7802740.htm" title="commodoreusa.net">it</a> [commodoreusa.net] ships with Ubuntu.</p><p>Commodore BASIC Black</p><p>Price:     No Price<br>Prod. Code: CBS-C2D-7500-2-160-D-B<br>System Color: Silver or Black<br>Network Adapter (NIC): Integrated 10/100/1000MB Ethernet<br>Intel&#174; Processors: Intel&#174; Core(TM) 2 Duo Processor E7500 (2.93GHz, 3MB, 1066MHz FSB)<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; This CPU does not support Windows&#174; XP Virtualization in Windows&#174; 7<br>Memory: 2GB DDR2 Non-ECC SDRAM, 800MHz<br>Hard Drive: 160GB SATA, 7200 RPM Hard Drive<br>Optical Drive: Dual-Layer DVD+/-RW drive + Nero express 7 Essentials<br>Operating System: <b>Ubuntu 9.10 Desktop Edition CD</b><br>Warranty: 1Yr Warranty + Lifetime Phone Support</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , it [ commodoreusa.net ] ships with Ubuntu.Commodore BASIC BlackPrice : No PriceProd .
Code : CBS-C2D-7500-2-160-D-BSystem Color : Silver or BlackNetwork Adapter ( NIC ) : Integrated 10/100/1000MB EthernetIntel   Processors : Intel   Core ( TM ) 2 Duo Processor E7500 ( 2.93GHz , 3MB , 1066MHz FSB )             This CPU does not support Windows   XP Virtualization in Windows   7Memory : 2GB DDR2 Non-ECC SDRAM , 800MHzHard Drive : 160GB SATA , 7200 RPM Hard DriveOptical Drive : Dual-Layer DVD + /-RW drive + Nero express 7 EssentialsOperating System : Ubuntu 9.10 Desktop Edition CDWarranty : 1Yr Warranty + Lifetime Phone Support</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, it [commodoreusa.net] ships with Ubuntu.Commodore BASIC BlackPrice:     No PriceProd.
Code: CBS-C2D-7500-2-160-D-BSystem Color: Silver or BlackNetwork Adapter (NIC): Integrated 10/100/1000MB EthernetIntel® Processors: Intel® Core(TM) 2 Duo Processor E7500 (2.93GHz, 3MB, 1066MHz FSB)
            This CPU does not support Windows® XP Virtualization in Windows® 7Memory: 2GB DDR2 Non-ECC SDRAM, 800MHzHard Drive: 160GB SATA, 7200 RPM Hard DriveOptical Drive: Dual-Layer DVD+/-RW drive + Nero express 7 EssentialsOperating System: Ubuntu 9.10 Desktop Edition CDWarranty: 1Yr Warranty + Lifetime Phone Support</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600436</id>
	<title>Those were the days.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269456060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is not a commodore, it is just another PC clone.</p><p>I remember the blue screen with the prompt and having to load in the directory listing from the disk.  At the end I used a C128 with a RAM based 1GB disk drive, it booted GEOS 128 instantly.  I used this computer with a dot matrix printer for college.  I even was asked several times what computer I had prepared the reports on.  ( I cheated and xeroxed in graphs and charts into blank spaces I had left in the reports.)</p><p>I still think that extending the chips out just a bit to be just slightly more capable, stereo sound, 65,000 color screen, hdmi connector, 1GB of RAM with a GEOS that is modified to take full advantage of the improvements could still be a kill for a lot less than any existing computer.  Use a couple of dedicated chips for audio/video decoding.  Use SDHC for storage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is not a commodore , it is just another PC clone.I remember the blue screen with the prompt and having to load in the directory listing from the disk .
At the end I used a C128 with a RAM based 1GB disk drive , it booted GEOS 128 instantly .
I used this computer with a dot matrix printer for college .
I even was asked several times what computer I had prepared the reports on .
( I cheated and xeroxed in graphs and charts into blank spaces I had left in the reports .
) I still think that extending the chips out just a bit to be just slightly more capable , stereo sound , 65,000 color screen , hdmi connector , 1GB of RAM with a GEOS that is modified to take full advantage of the improvements could still be a kill for a lot less than any existing computer .
Use a couple of dedicated chips for audio/video decoding .
Use SDHC for storage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is not a commodore, it is just another PC clone.I remember the blue screen with the prompt and having to load in the directory listing from the disk.
At the end I used a C128 with a RAM based 1GB disk drive, it booted GEOS 128 instantly.
I used this computer with a dot matrix printer for college.
I even was asked several times what computer I had prepared the reports on.
( I cheated and xeroxed in graphs and charts into blank spaces I had left in the reports.
)I still think that extending the chips out just a bit to be just slightly more capable, stereo sound, 65,000 color screen, hdmi connector, 1GB of RAM with a GEOS that is modified to take full advantage of the improvements could still be a kill for a lot less than any existing computer.
Use a couple of dedicated chips for audio/video decoding.
Use SDHC for storage.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596098</id>
	<title>Upgrades?</title>
	<author>wjousts</author>
	<datestamp>1269437340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the commodoreusa website:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>There&rsquo;s nothing like it. At just 17.5 inches wide and 2 inches tall, it&rsquo;s designed to take up far less room &mdash; and use far less energy &mdash; than any other desktop computer.</p></div><p>So, in other words, it's a desktop that will be a colossal PITA upgrade and will probably use non-standard parts to get everything to fit. All the upgrade inconvenience of a laptop with none of the advantages.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the commodoreusa website : There    s nothing like it .
At just 17.5 inches wide and 2 inches tall , it    s designed to take up far less room    and use far less energy    than any other desktop computer.So , in other words , it 's a desktop that will be a colossal PITA upgrade and will probably use non-standard parts to get everything to fit .
All the upgrade inconvenience of a laptop with none of the advantages .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the commodoreusa website:There’s nothing like it.
At just 17.5 inches wide and 2 inches tall, it’s designed to take up far less room — and use far less energy — than any other desktop computer.So, in other words, it's a desktop that will be a colossal PITA upgrade and will probably use non-standard parts to get everything to fit.
All the upgrade inconvenience of a laptop with none of the advantages.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597532</id>
	<title>Re:This is not a Mac at all</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1269445200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bet the new Macs don't even have 128K of RAM!</p><p>Seriously, what's with all these comments - why don't you go and post them to all the Mac stories? Or all the Windows stories, saying how it's not Windows, because Windows was a GUI that ran on DOS?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet the new Macs do n't even have 128K of RAM ! Seriously , what 's with all these comments - why do n't you go and post them to all the Mac stories ?
Or all the Windows stories , saying how it 's not Windows , because Windows was a GUI that ran on DOS ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet the new Macs don't even have 128K of RAM!Seriously, what's with all these comments - why don't you go and post them to all the Mac stories?
Or all the Windows stories, saying how it's not Windows, because Windows was a GUI that ran on DOS?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596242</id>
	<title>Re:Clear Hoax</title>
	<author>paazin</author>
	<datestamp>1269438120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh, how the mighty have fallen.<br> <br>You'd probably have little doubt that the site is genuine, if you simply examined it further.  It really is rather pathetic -- they're looking for people to only purchase this slapped together crap for nostalgia's sake.<br> <br>No news story here folks, just another company trying to peddle something no one will buy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , how the mighty have fallen .
You 'd probably have little doubt that the site is genuine , if you simply examined it further .
It really is rather pathetic -- they 're looking for people to only purchase this slapped together crap for nostalgia 's sake .
No news story here folks , just another company trying to peddle something no one will buy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, how the mighty have fallen.
You'd probably have little doubt that the site is genuine, if you simply examined it further.
It really is rather pathetic -- they're looking for people to only purchase this slapped together crap for nostalgia's sake.
No news story here folks, just another company trying to peddle something no one will buy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596746</id>
	<title>Re:Not really a comeback</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1269441540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They could have put an emulator on and do all this.<br>I kind of wish someone would create a mythical NextGen C64. Kind of what Commodore might have made if they had made a better C128.<br>Imagine a 65816 CPU and an HD64180 to replace the z80 .</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They could have put an emulator on and do all this.I kind of wish someone would create a mythical NextGen C64 .
Kind of what Commodore might have made if they had made a better C128.Imagine a 65816 CPU and an HD64180 to replace the z80 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They could have put an emulator on and do all this.I kind of wish someone would create a mythical NextGen C64.
Kind of what Commodore might have made if they had made a better C128.Imagine a 65816 CPU and an HD64180 to replace the z80 .</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596022</id>
	<title>Not Commodore 64</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1269436860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's called the "Phoenix". "Commodore" is just the brand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's called the " Phoenix " .
" Commodore " is just the brand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's called the "Phoenix".
"Commodore" is just the brand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595996</id>
	<title>Hmmmm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269436680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hmmmm..  Wonder if it's backwards compatible..??</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmmmm.. Wonder if it 's backwards compatible.. ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmmmm..  Wonder if it's backwards compatible..?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31602984</id>
	<title>What would get me to buy it...</title>
	<author>Sabalon</author>
	<datestamp>1269422520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because the Internet cares about my opinion<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)   Srsly, as someone with a C-64 at work and home, yeah..fanboy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>While I think it looks neat, if they would bundle a quality C-64 emulator WITH most of the old games (yeah...legal issues galore) then I would grab it up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because the Internet cares about my opinion : ) Srsly , as someone with a C-64 at work and home , yeah..fanboy : ) While I think it looks neat , if they would bundle a quality C-64 emulator WITH most of the old games ( yeah...legal issues galore ) then I would grab it up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because the Internet cares about my opinion :)   Srsly, as someone with a C-64 at work and home, yeah..fanboy :)While I think it looks neat, if they would bundle a quality C-64 emulator WITH most of the old games (yeah...legal issues galore) then I would grab it up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31598634</id>
	<title>Re:The C64, an eulogy</title>
	<author>zr-rifle</author>
	<datestamp>1269449400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Correction, I made a couple of typos and I really meant "for the masses, not for the classes", as Jack said it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Correction , I made a couple of typos and I really meant " for the masses , not for the classes " , as Jack said it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correction, I made a couple of typos and I really meant "for the masses, not for the classes", as Jack said it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596174</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31603540</id>
	<title>Modern engineering</title>
	<author>bored</author>
	<datestamp>1269424620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's an Intel running windows/linux to host a c64 emulator at 500Mhz. That's because its cheaper to engineer a 500mhz C64 using an x86 and an emulator than design one from scratch. Chuckle...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's an Intel running windows/linux to host a c64 emulator at 500Mhz .
That 's because its cheaper to engineer a 500mhz C64 using an x86 and an emulator than design one from scratch .
Chuckle.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's an Intel running windows/linux to host a c64 emulator at 500Mhz.
That's because its cheaper to engineer a 500mhz C64 using an x86 and an emulator than design one from scratch.
Chuckle...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596916</id>
	<title>Re:Not really a comeback</title>
	<author>91degrees</author>
	<datestamp>1269442500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>It has a much more powerful software synthesizer that can do a good job of emulating the SID.</i> <br> <br>
The SID is a quirky piece of hardware, and it's actually pretty hard to emulate it perfectly.  Even some cycle accurate simulations have issues with some c64 tunes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It has a much more powerful software synthesizer that can do a good job of emulating the SID .
The SID is a quirky piece of hardware , and it 's actually pretty hard to emulate it perfectly .
Even some cycle accurate simulations have issues with some c64 tunes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has a much more powerful software synthesizer that can do a good job of emulating the SID.
The SID is a quirky piece of hardware, and it's actually pretty hard to emulate it perfectly.
Even some cycle accurate simulations have issues with some c64 tunes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597388</id>
	<title>So? A Mac isn't a Mac, by that logic</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1269444660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And Macs aren't Macs, Apple are just re-using the trademark. (Different OS, different hardware - it's like Trigger's Broom... "Macs" today are just PCs, no different to this new Commodore 64.)</p><p>Which is entirely correct of course, but I don't see your surprise. It's perfectly normal in computing, or indeed all kinds of products, for popular trademarks to be used, even when the underlying technology changes, or even is entirely different.</p><p>Or do you think the current Intel Pentiums are like the original? No, they just re-used the trademark for their cut down Core Duos. AMD have now done the same thing with the Athlon trademark.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And Macs are n't Macs , Apple are just re-using the trademark .
( Different OS , different hardware - it 's like Trigger 's Broom... " Macs " today are just PCs , no different to this new Commodore 64 .
) Which is entirely correct of course , but I do n't see your surprise .
It 's perfectly normal in computing , or indeed all kinds of products , for popular trademarks to be used , even when the underlying technology changes , or even is entirely different.Or do you think the current Intel Pentiums are like the original ?
No , they just re-used the trademark for their cut down Core Duos .
AMD have now done the same thing with the Athlon trademark .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And Macs aren't Macs, Apple are just re-using the trademark.
(Different OS, different hardware - it's like Trigger's Broom... "Macs" today are just PCs, no different to this new Commodore 64.
)Which is entirely correct of course, but I don't see your surprise.
It's perfectly normal in computing, or indeed all kinds of products, for popular trademarks to be used, even when the underlying technology changes, or even is entirely different.Or do you think the current Intel Pentiums are like the original?
No, they just re-used the trademark for their cut down Core Duos.
AMD have now done the same thing with the Athlon trademark.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597058</id>
	<title>Re:Clear Hoax</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1269443160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the Apple precedence - we get front page news when there's so much as a rumour of an Islate, or that they're allegedly ordering some new parts, honest, according to some blog that speculates on a new product. So I'm not surprised at a once in a blue moon story about rumours for the Commodore 64.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the Apple precedence - we get front page news when there 's so much as a rumour of an Islate , or that they 're allegedly ordering some new parts , honest , according to some blog that speculates on a new product .
So I 'm not surprised at a once in a blue moon story about rumours for the Commodore 64 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the Apple precedence - we get front page news when there's so much as a rumour of an Islate, or that they're allegedly ordering some new parts, honest, according to some blog that speculates on a new product.
So I'm not surprised at a once in a blue moon story about rumours for the Commodore 64.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597062</id>
	<title>Re:64-bit?!</title>
	<author>jandrese</author>
	<datestamp>1269443160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll give it a pass if it boots up into ROM BASIC by default, and you have to flip a switch or something to get it to boot into Windows.  I'll even be so generous as to give it bonus points if the ROM BASIC has a programmable sound chip (emulator) and sprite generator accessible.  Double bonus points if the manual is thick and informative.  They win the grand prize if the power supply is a cheap piece of crap that breaks every 6 months.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll give it a pass if it boots up into ROM BASIC by default , and you have to flip a switch or something to get it to boot into Windows .
I 'll even be so generous as to give it bonus points if the ROM BASIC has a programmable sound chip ( emulator ) and sprite generator accessible .
Double bonus points if the manual is thick and informative .
They win the grand prize if the power supply is a cheap piece of crap that breaks every 6 months .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll give it a pass if it boots up into ROM BASIC by default, and you have to flip a switch or something to get it to boot into Windows.
I'll even be so generous as to give it bonus points if the ROM BASIC has a programmable sound chip (emulator) and sprite generator accessible.
Double bonus points if the manual is thick and informative.
They win the grand prize if the power supply is a cheap piece of crap that breaks every 6 months.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596358</id>
	<title>Re:The C64, an eulogy</title>
	<author>Onymous Coward</author>
	<datestamp>1269439020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tramiel was an ass, though.  Sure, his contribution to the end effect was good, but talk about mistreatment of engineers.  If you want unsung heroes, let's mention Bob Yannes and Al Charpentier and Charles Winterble.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tramiel was an ass , though .
Sure , his contribution to the end effect was good , but talk about mistreatment of engineers .
If you want unsung heroes , let 's mention Bob Yannes and Al Charpentier and Charles Winterble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tramiel was an ass, though.
Sure, his contribution to the end effect was good, but talk about mistreatment of engineers.
If you want unsung heroes, let's mention Bob Yannes and Al Charpentier and Charles Winterble.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596174</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596652</id>
	<title>Re:64-bit?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269440700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wake me up when it runs the old games from 5-1/4 and 3-1/2 floppy disks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wake me up when it runs the old games from 5-1/4 and 3-1/2 floppy disks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wake me up when it runs the old games from 5-1/4 and 3-1/2 floppy disks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596326</id>
	<title>A long time ago</title>
	<author>rossdee</author>
	<datestamp>1269438780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had a C+64 once. It was the 4th computer I bought.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had a C + 64 once .
It was the 4th computer I bought .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had a C+64 once.
It was the 4th computer I bought.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31599104</id>
	<title>Re:Commodore 64?</title>
	<author>OrangeTide</author>
	<datestamp>1269451020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>4194304 would be 4M, it's been a while since a PC shipped with only 4M RAM.</p><p>They should at least bundle a C64 emulator with the thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>4194304 would be 4M , it 's been a while since a PC shipped with only 4M RAM.They should at least bundle a C64 emulator with the thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4194304 would be 4M, it's been a while since a PC shipped with only 4M RAM.They should at least bundle a C64 emulator with the thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595934</id>
	<title>Commodore 64?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269436380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds more like a Commodore 2010 to me.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds more like a Commodore 2010 to me .
: p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds more like a Commodore 2010 to me.
:p</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596988</id>
	<title>Re:Upgrades?</title>
	<author>MMC Monster</author>
	<datestamp>1269442860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>From the commodoreusa website:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>There&rsquo;s nothing like it. At just 17.5 inches wide and 2 inches tall, it&rsquo;s designed to take up far less room &mdash; and use far less energy &mdash; than any other desktop computer.</p></div></div><p>Ahem.</p><p>Mac Mini.</p><p>(Not that I'm a fanboi.  There are lots of machines in this form factor.  System76 used to make an Ubuntu box in a similar form factor, but I can't seem to find it on their website anymore.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the commodoreusa website : There    s nothing like it .
At just 17.5 inches wide and 2 inches tall , it    s designed to take up far less room    and use far less energy    than any other desktop computer.Ahem.Mac Mini .
( Not that I 'm a fanboi .
There are lots of machines in this form factor .
System76 used to make an Ubuntu box in a similar form factor , but I ca n't seem to find it on their website anymore .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the commodoreusa website:There’s nothing like it.
At just 17.5 inches wide and 2 inches tall, it’s designed to take up far less room — and use far less energy — than any other desktop computer.Ahem.Mac Mini.
(Not that I'm a fanboi.
There are lots of machines in this form factor.
System76 used to make an Ubuntu box in a similar form factor, but I can't seem to find it on their website anymore.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597378</id>
	<title>Re:I already have one</title>
	<author>greed</author>
	<datestamp>1269444600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I put a WYSE sticker on my Mac and now it's a dumb terminal!</p><p>Or maybe I'm just terminally dumb....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I put a WYSE sticker on my Mac and now it 's a dumb terminal ! Or maybe I 'm just terminally dumb... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I put a WYSE sticker on my Mac and now it's a dumb terminal!Or maybe I'm just terminally dumb....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596498</id>
	<title>someone get me a butterknife.....</title>
	<author>inerlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1269439860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>TI99/4A<br>C-64<br>Apple IIe<br><br>all near and dear to my heart....<br>but they can stay in the past.<br><br>(i still own 3 working 99/4As though....)</htmltext>
<tokenext>TI99/4AC-64Apple IIeall near and dear to my heart....but they can stay in the past .
( i still own 3 working 99/4As though.... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TI99/4AC-64Apple IIeall near and dear to my heart....but they can stay in the past.
(i still own 3 working 99/4As though....)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596046</id>
	<title>which is set to open June 1</title>
	<author>wjousts</author>
	<datestamp>1269437100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are you sure that's not April 1?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you sure that 's not April 1 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you sure that's not April 1?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596488</id>
	<title>Re:This is not a C64 at all</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269439800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps it has 64 KB of L1 cache?  Although with four cores even that would add up to 256 KB.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps it has 64 KB of L1 cache ?
Although with four cores even that would add up to 256 KB .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps it has 64 KB of L1 cache?
Although with four cores even that would add up to 256 KB.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31608516</id>
	<title>Re:A Commodore In Name Only</title>
	<author>rdnetto</author>
	<datestamp>1269517020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Talk about poor market research. I would expect most of the people interested in a Commodore 64 look-alike to use Linux.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Talk about poor market research .
I would expect most of the people interested in a Commodore 64 look-alike to use Linux .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Talk about poor market research.
I would expect most of the people interested in a Commodore 64 look-alike to use Linux.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595968</id>
	<title>I already have one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269436560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously!  I pulled the sticker off my old Commodore 64 this morning and put it on my computer. Now it too is a commodore 64!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously !
I pulled the sticker off my old Commodore 64 this morning and put it on my computer .
Now it too is a commodore 64 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously!
I pulled the sticker off my old Commodore 64 this morning and put it on my computer.
Now it too is a commodore 64!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595944</id>
	<title>?syntax error</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269436440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>first prost</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>first prost</tokentext>
<sentencetext>first prost</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596020</id>
	<title>That's not a Commodore 64...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269436860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The quad code system with be a Plus/4!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The quad code system with be a Plus/4 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The quad code system with be a Plus/4!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595958</id>
	<title>Pick your OS flavor?</title>
	<author>soup4you2</author>
	<datestamp>1269436500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"will run the Linux, Windows and Mac OS X operating systems."</i>
<br> <br>
This could get interesting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" will run the Linux , Windows and Mac OS X operating systems .
" This could get interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"will run the Linux, Windows and Mac OS X operating systems.
"
 
This could get interesting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596156</id>
	<title>Re:Not really a comeback</title>
	<author>lxs</author>
	<datestamp>1269437580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It runs a crappy excuse for an operating system made by Microsoft. So in that way it is very similar to the old 64.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It runs a crappy excuse for an operating system made by Microsoft .
So in that way it is very similar to the old 64 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It runs a crappy excuse for an operating system made by Microsoft.
So in that way it is very similar to the old 64.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596352</id>
	<title>Re:Clear Hoax</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269439020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Look. at. the. site.

It's a chinese 3rd rate gadget imitator wet dream. There is a pseudo-configuration page vaguely mimicking Dell's one with no functionality. No logo. No design. and GOD that heinous thing in the pictures looks CLUNKY and CHEAP.

This is a hoax.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. have seen several in the past years tied to the good old C64. I'm very surprised it made the front page<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></div><p>I think it is legit enough.  Commodore USA is a registered company in the United States, and their site is quite clearly commodoreusa.net</p><p>The actual issue is not so much that it looks like a hoax, but that it is so endlessly poorly carried out.  It's pathetic!  It's like watching <em> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birdemic" title="wikipedia.org">Birdemic</a> [wikipedia.org] </em>, a product that tries to itself seriously, while everyone around it is laughing (and possibly crying a little inside).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Look .
at. the .
site . It 's a chinese 3rd rate gadget imitator wet dream .
There is a pseudo-configuration page vaguely mimicking Dell 's one with no functionality .
No logo .
No design .
and GOD that heinous thing in the pictures looks CLUNKY and CHEAP .
This is a hoax .
/. have seen several in the past years tied to the good old C64 .
I 'm very surprised it made the front page : ( I think it is legit enough .
Commodore USA is a registered company in the United States , and their site is quite clearly commodoreusa.netThe actual issue is not so much that it looks like a hoax , but that it is so endlessly poorly carried out .
It 's pathetic !
It 's like watching Birdemic [ wikipedia.org ] , a product that tries to itself seriously , while everyone around it is laughing ( and possibly crying a little inside ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look.
at. the.
site.

It's a chinese 3rd rate gadget imitator wet dream.
There is a pseudo-configuration page vaguely mimicking Dell's one with no functionality.
No logo.
No design.
and GOD that heinous thing in the pictures looks CLUNKY and CHEAP.
This is a hoax.
/. have seen several in the past years tied to the good old C64.
I'm very surprised it made the front page :(I think it is legit enough.
Commodore USA is a registered company in the United States, and their site is quite clearly commodoreusa.netThe actual issue is not so much that it looks like a hoax, but that it is so endlessly poorly carried out.
It's pathetic!
It's like watching  Birdemic [wikipedia.org] , a product that tries to itself seriously, while everyone around it is laughing (and possibly crying a little inside).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31599732</id>
	<title>Still waiting....</title>
	<author>sheph</author>
	<datestamp>1269453360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not interested.  I'm holding out for the new TI 99/4A.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not interested .
I 'm holding out for the new TI 99/4A .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not interested.
I'm holding out for the new TI 99/4A.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596060</id>
	<title>Re:Pick your OS flavor?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269437160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"will run the Linux, Windows and Mac OS X operating systems."</p> </div><p>Apple vs. Psystar ended with a $30,000 fine for copying MacOS X per se without permission ($30,000 for an unlimited number of copies, RIAA take note), plus $2500 for each individual case of DMCA violation (that is $2500 per each single copy put on a non-Apple branded computer that actually works; that's the expensive part). And if the machine is just \_capable\_ of running unmodified MacOS X, that is already a DMCA violation, whether the company or an end user installs the OS or not.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" will run the Linux , Windows and Mac OS X operating systems .
" Apple vs. Psystar ended with a $ 30,000 fine for copying MacOS X per se without permission ( $ 30,000 for an unlimited number of copies , RIAA take note ) , plus $ 2500 for each individual case of DMCA violation ( that is $ 2500 per each single copy put on a non-Apple branded computer that actually works ; that 's the expensive part ) .
And if the machine is just \ _capable \ _ of running unmodified MacOS X , that is already a DMCA violation , whether the company or an end user installs the OS or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"will run the Linux, Windows and Mac OS X operating systems.
" Apple vs. Psystar ended with a $30,000 fine for copying MacOS X per se without permission ($30,000 for an unlimited number of copies, RIAA take note), plus $2500 for each individual case of DMCA violation (that is $2500 per each single copy put on a non-Apple branded computer that actually works; that's the expensive part).
And if the machine is just \_capable\_ of running unmodified MacOS X, that is already a DMCA violation, whether the company or an end user installs the OS or not.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597610</id>
	<title>This makes me feel black; I used my C64 until 1990</title>
	<author>gravy.jones</author>
	<datestamp>1269445560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
10 poke 53270,0<br>
20 poke 53271,0<br>
30 goto 10<br>
<br>
run</htmltext>
<tokenext>10 poke 53270,0 20 poke 53271,0 30 goto 10 run</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
10 poke 53270,0
20 poke 53271,0
30 goto 10

run</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596310</id>
	<title>Re:This is not a C64 at all</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269438660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So how is it a C64 then? I bet it doesn't even have 64K of RAM.</p></div><p>Because they expect to sell 64 units ?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So how is it a C64 then ?
I bet it does n't even have 64K of RAM.Because they expect to sell 64 units ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So how is it a C64 then?
I bet it doesn't even have 64K of RAM.Because they expect to sell 64 units ?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597824</id>
	<title>Programmer's Reference Manual</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269446520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The spirit of the old C64 was embodied in the fine Programmer's Reference Manual, which showed:<br>
&nbsp; - Complete schematics,<br>
&nbsp; - Machine language instructions,<br>
&nbsp; - Hardware specs &amp; programming examples for all chips,<br>
&nbsp; - Full documentation of EVERY BYTE in the memory &amp; operating system.<br>If the manufacturer could supply this, there would be a STAMPEDE to buy this box! (I would be first in line...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The spirit of the old C64 was embodied in the fine Programmer 's Reference Manual , which showed :   - Complete schematics ,   - Machine language instructions ,   - Hardware specs &amp; programming examples for all chips ,   - Full documentation of EVERY BYTE in the memory &amp; operating system.If the manufacturer could supply this , there would be a STAMPEDE to buy this box !
( I would be first in line... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The spirit of the old C64 was embodied in the fine Programmer's Reference Manual, which showed:
  - Complete schematics,
  - Machine language instructions,
  - Hardware specs &amp; programming examples for all chips,
  - Full documentation of EVERY BYTE in the memory &amp; operating system.If the manufacturer could supply this, there would be a STAMPEDE to buy this box!
(I would be first in line...)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31602666</id>
	<title>Re:64-bit?!</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1269421260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Whew! Thanks for clearing up that misunderstanding for us. I mean, I don't think I was alone in thinking that a computer with an Intel 64-bit quad-core cpu was a Commodore 64. Internet needs more people like you to stop people from trying to cash in on famous names from spreading their disinformation!</p></div>
</blockquote><p>Bullshit! I clearly remember my Commodore 64 having an Intel 64-bit quad-core CPU with dual-head graphics and 4096x2048 resolution on the monitor.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whew !
Thanks for clearing up that misunderstanding for us .
I mean , I do n't think I was alone in thinking that a computer with an Intel 64-bit quad-core cpu was a Commodore 64 .
Internet needs more people like you to stop people from trying to cash in on famous names from spreading their disinformation !
Bullshit ! I clearly remember my Commodore 64 having an Intel 64-bit quad-core CPU with dual-head graphics and 4096x2048 resolution on the monitor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whew!
Thanks for clearing up that misunderstanding for us.
I mean, I don't think I was alone in thinking that a computer with an Intel 64-bit quad-core cpu was a Commodore 64.
Internet needs more people like you to stop people from trying to cash in on famous names from spreading their disinformation!
Bullshit! I clearly remember my Commodore 64 having an Intel 64-bit quad-core CPU with dual-head graphics and 4096x2048 resolution on the monitor.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596088</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597032</id>
	<title>Re:Clear Hoax</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269443040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the News page:</p><blockquote><div><p>On top of all this, we are diligently and fervently entrenched in the negotiations that will allow us to place this cute little logo nameplate on our all-in-one computer.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the News page : On top of all this , we are diligently and fervently entrenched in the negotiations that will allow us to place this cute little logo nameplate on our all-in-one computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the News page:On top of all this, we are diligently and fervently entrenched in the negotiations that will allow us to place this cute little logo nameplate on our all-in-one computer.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596122</id>
	<title>Re:Not really a comeback</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1269437460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Can I peek or poke the memory?</p></div><p>Yes. It's called a kernel debugger (yes, correctly spelled this time).</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Can I play Turrican and Hawkeye on it?</p></div><p>Yes, in a suitable emulator.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Does it have a SID?</p></div><p>It has a much more powerful software synthesizer that can do a good job of emulating the SID.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I peek or poke the memory ? Yes .
It 's called a kernel debugger ( yes , correctly spelled this time ) .Can I play Turrican and Hawkeye on it ? Yes , in a suitable emulator.Does it have a SID ? It has a much more powerful software synthesizer that can do a good job of emulating the SID .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I peek or poke the memory?Yes.
It's called a kernel debugger (yes, correctly spelled this time).Can I play Turrican and Hawkeye on it?Yes, in a suitable emulator.Does it have a SID?It has a much more powerful software synthesizer that can do a good job of emulating the SID.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932</id>
	<title>Clear Hoax</title>
	<author>1karmik1</author>
	<datestamp>1269436380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Look. at. the. site.

It's a chinese 3rd rate gadget imitator wet dream. There is a pseudo-configuration page vaguely mimicking Dell's one with no functionality. No logo. No design. and GOD that heinous thing in the pictures looks CLUNKY and CHEAP.

This is a hoax.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. have seen several in the past years tied to the good old C64. I'm very surprised it made the front page<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</htmltext>
<tokenext>Look .
at. the .
site . It 's a chinese 3rd rate gadget imitator wet dream .
There is a pseudo-configuration page vaguely mimicking Dell 's one with no functionality .
No logo .
No design .
and GOD that heinous thing in the pictures looks CLUNKY and CHEAP .
This is a hoax .
/. have seen several in the past years tied to the good old C64 .
I 'm very surprised it made the front page : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look.
at. the.
site.

It's a chinese 3rd rate gadget imitator wet dream.
There is a pseudo-configuration page vaguely mimicking Dell's one with no functionality.
No logo.
No design.
and GOD that heinous thing in the pictures looks CLUNKY and CHEAP.
This is a hoax.
/. have seen several in the past years tied to the good old C64.
I'm very surprised it made the front page :(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597168</id>
	<title>Re:Clear Hoax</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269443760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Haha, just look at the slide show on the main page of the site! In one picture you can clearly see two windows keys on the product, and in the very next they've both been shopped out! Gold.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Haha , just look at the slide show on the main page of the site !
In one picture you can clearly see two windows keys on the product , and in the very next they 've both been shopped out !
Gold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Haha, just look at the slide show on the main page of the site!
In one picture you can clearly see two windows keys on the product, and in the very next they've both been shopped out!
Gold.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596428</id>
	<title>Re:I already have one</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1269439440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm running Ubuntu on my NES. No fancy labelling, I just slipped an old cartridge into the empty 5.25" bay until it fit and wired up a controller to the serial port.<br> <br>At first it wouldn't boot, but blowing on the cartridge contacts worked a treat.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm running Ubuntu on my NES .
No fancy labelling , I just slipped an old cartridge into the empty 5.25 " bay until it fit and wired up a controller to the serial port .
At first it would n't boot , but blowing on the cartridge contacts worked a treat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm running Ubuntu on my NES.
No fancy labelling, I just slipped an old cartridge into the empty 5.25" bay until it fit and wired up a controller to the serial port.
At first it wouldn't boot, but blowing on the cartridge contacts worked a treat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31601850</id>
	<title>Sick!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269461280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sick!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sick !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sick!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596112</id>
	<title>Are they using original C64s...</title>
	<author>AC-x</author>
	<datestamp>1269437460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... to host their website?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... to host their website ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... to host their website?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596716</id>
	<title>Re:Clear Hoax</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269441300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>YAY TIMOTHY. Timothy stories are the best.</p><p>We need to get rid of Timothy and get rid of all the 'I-learned-about-Linux-cause-Ubuntu-is-for-hackers-like-me' kids. Please return to your former glory slashdot!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>YAY TIMOTHY .
Timothy stories are the best.We need to get rid of Timothy and get rid of all the 'I-learned-about-Linux-cause-Ubuntu-is-for-hackers-like-me ' kids .
Please return to your former glory slashdot !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>YAY TIMOTHY.
Timothy stories are the best.We need to get rid of Timothy and get rid of all the 'I-learned-about-Linux-cause-Ubuntu-is-for-hackers-like-me' kids.
Please return to your former glory slashdot!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597680</id>
	<title>Cartriges?</title>
	<author>goombah99</author>
	<datestamp>1269445800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it's a hoax then why is Orange Micro is partnering with Pystar to bring out a Mac OSX emulation cartridge?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it 's a hoax then why is Orange Micro is partnering with Pystar to bring out a Mac OSX emulation cartridge ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it's a hoax then why is Orange Micro is partnering with Pystar to bring out a Mac OSX emulation cartridge?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600660</id>
	<title>commodore64 site</title>
	<author>fatbuckel</author>
	<datestamp>1269456780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>really? nice site.</htmltext>
<tokenext>really ?
nice site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>really?
nice site.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596180</id>
	<title>Re:A Commodore In Name Only</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269437700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And why anyone would want to revive the Commodore name is beyond me. Commodore killed one of the best computers of its age... (the Amiga) Might as well brand your product the "Mein Furher" brand...</htmltext>
<tokenext>And why anyone would want to revive the Commodore name is beyond me .
Commodore killed one of the best computers of its age... ( the Amiga ) Might as well brand your product the " Mein Furher " brand.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And why anyone would want to revive the Commodore name is beyond me.
Commodore killed one of the best computers of its age... (the Amiga) Might as well brand your product the "Mein Furher" brand...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596276</id>
	<title>Looks just like a ZPC to me</title>
	<author>hazmat2k</author>
	<datestamp>1269438360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.cybernetman.com/en/products/zero-footprint-pc/" title="cybernetman.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cybernetman.com/en/products/zero-footprint-pc/</a> [cybernetman.com]

hell, they didn't even bother to change the filenames for the images they nicked off the site</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.cybernetman.com/en/products/zero-footprint-pc/ [ cybernetman.com ] hell , they did n't even bother to change the filenames for the images they nicked off the site</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.cybernetman.com/en/products/zero-footprint-pc/ [cybernetman.com]

hell, they didn't even bother to change the filenames for the images they nicked off the site</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595942</id>
	<title>C64 = Legend</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269436440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Legends never die, they just sys 64738</htmltext>
<tokenext>Legends never die , they just sys 64738</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Legends never die, they just sys 64738</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597656</id>
	<title>Re:Riding the back of nostalgia.</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1269445680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Sure, the C64 was a fantastic machine in its time. But that was the 1980s.</i></p><p>The only thing more annoying than 20 people pointing out that this new machine has completely upgraded technology (and then moaning about it on those grounds) is that we then get a comment from someone who seriously thinks they're releasing exactly the same machine.</p><p>I might as well criticise the latest Mac, on the grounds that it runs a slow 68000, and can't even multitask.</p><p><i>They're planning an all-in-one keyboard computer, just like the original C64, and I can pretty much guarantee: it'll flop. The design had good reason back in the 80s, but not so much now</i></p><p>Yeah, no one buys computers combined with keyboards now do they (hint, they outsell desktops these days).</p><p>Now sure, it's not going to be a market leader, but I'm not sure it will flop. It's true that the "space saving" desktop PCs tend to be a niche AFAIK, but equally, they've hardly flopped - you can walk into mainstream stores and see them for sale, for example.</p><p>Whilst I'm personally not interested in this design, I'd still favour it over combining the computer with the monitor, i.e., what Apple do, and you don't see people moaning about that, nor do they seem to have flopped.</p><p>As for the name - well, you're reading it about it, aren't you? Would you be, if they hadn't have used the name? The point you're missing is not how many people today remember the Commodore name, but the fact that the name will give them lots of free advertising and coverage by the media (much like Apple often benefit from).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , the C64 was a fantastic machine in its time .
But that was the 1980s.The only thing more annoying than 20 people pointing out that this new machine has completely upgraded technology ( and then moaning about it on those grounds ) is that we then get a comment from someone who seriously thinks they 're releasing exactly the same machine.I might as well criticise the latest Mac , on the grounds that it runs a slow 68000 , and ca n't even multitask.They 're planning an all-in-one keyboard computer , just like the original C64 , and I can pretty much guarantee : it 'll flop .
The design had good reason back in the 80s , but not so much nowYeah , no one buys computers combined with keyboards now do they ( hint , they outsell desktops these days ) .Now sure , it 's not going to be a market leader , but I 'm not sure it will flop .
It 's true that the " space saving " desktop PCs tend to be a niche AFAIK , but equally , they 've hardly flopped - you can walk into mainstream stores and see them for sale , for example.Whilst I 'm personally not interested in this design , I 'd still favour it over combining the computer with the monitor , i.e. , what Apple do , and you do n't see people moaning about that , nor do they seem to have flopped.As for the name - well , you 're reading it about it , are n't you ?
Would you be , if they had n't have used the name ?
The point you 're missing is not how many people today remember the Commodore name , but the fact that the name will give them lots of free advertising and coverage by the media ( much like Apple often benefit from ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, the C64 was a fantastic machine in its time.
But that was the 1980s.The only thing more annoying than 20 people pointing out that this new machine has completely upgraded technology (and then moaning about it on those grounds) is that we then get a comment from someone who seriously thinks they're releasing exactly the same machine.I might as well criticise the latest Mac, on the grounds that it runs a slow 68000, and can't even multitask.They're planning an all-in-one keyboard computer, just like the original C64, and I can pretty much guarantee: it'll flop.
The design had good reason back in the 80s, but not so much nowYeah, no one buys computers combined with keyboards now do they (hint, they outsell desktops these days).Now sure, it's not going to be a market leader, but I'm not sure it will flop.
It's true that the "space saving" desktop PCs tend to be a niche AFAIK, but equally, they've hardly flopped - you can walk into mainstream stores and see them for sale, for example.Whilst I'm personally not interested in this design, I'd still favour it over combining the computer with the monitor, i.e., what Apple do, and you don't see people moaning about that, nor do they seem to have flopped.As for the name - well, you're reading it about it, aren't you?
Would you be, if they hadn't have used the name?
The point you're missing is not how many people today remember the Commodore name, but the fact that the name will give them lots of free advertising and coverage by the media (much like Apple often benefit from).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596566</id>
	<title>Re:I already have one</title>
	<author>somersault</author>
	<datestamp>1269440280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My car is a Commodore 64. It is also a George Foreman Grill.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My car is a Commodore 64 .
It is also a George Foreman Grill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My car is a Commodore 64.
It is also a George Foreman Grill.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596082</id>
	<title>this reminds me of Acorn</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269437280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.acorncomputers.co.uk/" title="acorncomputers.co.uk">Slap a familiar [UK] logo on a Wintel</a> [acorncomputers.co.uk]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slap a familiar [ UK ] logo on a Wintel [ acorncomputers.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slap a familiar [UK] logo on a Wintel [acorncomputers.co.uk]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596882</id>
	<title>Re:Upgrades?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269442320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>There's nothing like it. At just 17.5 inches wide and 2 inches tall, it's designed to take up far less room -- and use far less energy -- than any other desktop computer.</p></div><p>So, in other words, it's a desktop that will be a colossal PITA upgrade and will probably use non-standard parts to get everything to fit. All the upgrade inconvenience of a laptop with none of the advantages.</p></div><p>Seems more like an updated Amiga 600HD to me. A600 was 14x9.5"x3" and weighed about 6 lbs (with a big goofy external power supply whereon lies the switch... ugh.) 'Course, that had a 68000...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's nothing like it .
At just 17.5 inches wide and 2 inches tall , it 's designed to take up far less room -- and use far less energy -- than any other desktop computer.So , in other words , it 's a desktop that will be a colossal PITA upgrade and will probably use non-standard parts to get everything to fit .
All the upgrade inconvenience of a laptop with none of the advantages.Seems more like an updated Amiga 600HD to me .
A600 was 14x9.5 " x3 " and weighed about 6 lbs ( with a big goofy external power supply whereon lies the switch.. .
ugh. ) 'Course , that had a 68000.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's nothing like it.
At just 17.5 inches wide and 2 inches tall, it's designed to take up far less room -- and use far less energy -- than any other desktop computer.So, in other words, it's a desktop that will be a colossal PITA upgrade and will probably use non-standard parts to get everything to fit.
All the upgrade inconvenience of a laptop with none of the advantages.Seems more like an updated Amiga 600HD to me.
A600 was 14x9.5"x3" and weighed about 6 lbs (with a big goofy external power supply whereon lies the switch...
ugh.) 'Course, that had a 68000...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597318</id>
	<title>Re:The C64, an eulogy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269444360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jack Tramiel may be an unsung hero of the personal computer, but he also had the dubious distinction of playing key roles in the destruction of two of the most important computer companies of the era, Commodore and later, Atari.</p><p>Tramiel - and more importantly, his engineers - is often left out in the modern retelling of the personal computer story, which is often presented as if everything that wasn't Intel, Microsoft, and Apple was some sort of bizarre tangental experiment that really didn't matter.  Sadly, his management style was typical of the small-minded businessman, who treated his company as a fief and a playground for his personal grudges.</p><p>I often wonder how the Amiga would have fared long-term if a more competently-managed company than Commodore had bought it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jack Tramiel may be an unsung hero of the personal computer , but he also had the dubious distinction of playing key roles in the destruction of two of the most important computer companies of the era , Commodore and later , Atari.Tramiel - and more importantly , his engineers - is often left out in the modern retelling of the personal computer story , which is often presented as if everything that was n't Intel , Microsoft , and Apple was some sort of bizarre tangental experiment that really did n't matter .
Sadly , his management style was typical of the small-minded businessman , who treated his company as a fief and a playground for his personal grudges.I often wonder how the Amiga would have fared long-term if a more competently-managed company than Commodore had bought it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jack Tramiel may be an unsung hero of the personal computer, but he also had the dubious distinction of playing key roles in the destruction of two of the most important computer companies of the era, Commodore and later, Atari.Tramiel - and more importantly, his engineers - is often left out in the modern retelling of the personal computer story, which is often presented as if everything that wasn't Intel, Microsoft, and Apple was some sort of bizarre tangental experiment that really didn't matter.
Sadly, his management style was typical of the small-minded businessman, who treated his company as a fief and a playground for his personal grudges.I often wonder how the Amiga would have fared long-term if a more competently-managed company than Commodore had bought it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596174</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597590</id>
	<title>Re:Yawn</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1269445500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And Windows isn't Windows, because it's not a GUI running on DOS.</p><p>And Mac OS X isn't Mac OS, it's a completely different OS. Only Linux shares anything in common with the original.</p><p>So? I think these points are obvious - and you're only the 20th or so person to point this out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And Windows is n't Windows , because it 's not a GUI running on DOS.And Mac OS X is n't Mac OS , it 's a completely different OS .
Only Linux shares anything in common with the original.So ?
I think these points are obvious - and you 're only the 20th or so person to point this out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And Windows isn't Windows, because it's not a GUI running on DOS.And Mac OS X isn't Mac OS, it's a completely different OS.
Only Linux shares anything in common with the original.So?
I think these points are obvious - and you're only the 20th or so person to point this out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31602710</id>
	<title>Cassettes?</title>
	<author>Geek\_Cop</author>
	<datestamp>1269421500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does this mean I can dig out my cassette drive?  Oh how I miss waiting 80 minutes for a game to load!  I really would like to browse the old database I made in 6th grade that ranked all the girls in the school with their bud scale ratings.  How I would love to show THAT off on Facebook now.  Ahhh the glory days.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean I can dig out my cassette drive ?
Oh how I miss waiting 80 minutes for a game to load !
I really would like to browse the old database I made in 6th grade that ranked all the girls in the school with their bud scale ratings .
How I would love to show THAT off on Facebook now .
Ahhh the glory days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean I can dig out my cassette drive?
Oh how I miss waiting 80 minutes for a game to load!
I really would like to browse the old database I made in 6th grade that ranked all the girls in the school with their bud scale ratings.
How I would love to show THAT off on Facebook now.
Ahhh the glory days.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31598218</id>
	<title>Re:Riding the back of nostalgia.</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1269447960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The design had good reason back in the 80s, but not so much now</p></div></blockquote><p>On the contrary.  Many people buy laptops, but basically never move them from their desks except to dust, because they bought them to save space and get rid of the spiderweb of cables on and around their desktop.  They'll be attractive to POS resellers for the same reason.<br>
&nbsp; <br>It's a niche product for sure, but that's a different matter from having no reason to exist at all.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The design had good reason back in the 80s , but not so much nowOn the contrary .
Many people buy laptops , but basically never move them from their desks except to dust , because they bought them to save space and get rid of the spiderweb of cables on and around their desktop .
They 'll be attractive to POS resellers for the same reason .
  It 's a niche product for sure , but that 's a different matter from having no reason to exist at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The design had good reason back in the 80s, but not so much nowOn the contrary.
Many people buy laptops, but basically never move them from their desks except to dust, because they bought them to save space and get rid of the spiderweb of cables on and around their desktop.
They'll be attractive to POS resellers for the same reason.
  It's a niche product for sure, but that's a different matter from having no reason to exist at all.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31609708</id>
	<title>Old hardware support?</title>
	<author>DaVince21</author>
	<datestamp>1269527580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd just like to be able to connect any of my old C64 (and as a bonus, possibly Amiga) hardware to it and just play the games without any extra hassle. Connect the 5 inch floppy drive, insert a disk, load it onto the computer and play (and/or generate into disk image)!</p><p>Since this product is in no way related to an actual Commodore 64, however, fat chance they'll ever do something like that. Bah.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd just like to be able to connect any of my old C64 ( and as a bonus , possibly Amiga ) hardware to it and just play the games without any extra hassle .
Connect the 5 inch floppy drive , insert a disk , load it onto the computer and play ( and/or generate into disk image ) ! Since this product is in no way related to an actual Commodore 64 , however , fat chance they 'll ever do something like that .
Bah .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd just like to be able to connect any of my old C64 (and as a bonus, possibly Amiga) hardware to it and just play the games without any extra hassle.
Connect the 5 inch floppy drive, insert a disk, load it onto the computer and play (and/or generate into disk image)!Since this product is in no way related to an actual Commodore 64, however, fat chance they'll ever do something like that.
Bah.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597524</id>
	<title>Re:Clear Hoax</title>
	<author>rwven</author>
	<datestamp>1269445140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I figured out it was a hoax when i got down to where it says it will run "Linux, Windows, or Mac OS X."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I figured out it was a hoax when i got down to where it says it will run " Linux , Windows , or Mac OS X .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I figured out it was a hoax when i got down to where it says it will run "Linux, Windows, or Mac OS X.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31599138</id>
	<title>Backwards compatible?</title>
	<author>SoundGuyNoise</author>
	<datestamp>1269451200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Call me when it has a 5 1/4" floppy drive feature so I can play my classic games right off the disc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Call me when it has a 5 1/4 " floppy drive feature so I can play my classic games right off the disc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Call me when it has a 5 1/4" floppy drive feature so I can play my classic games right off the disc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597130</id>
	<title>Re:Pick your OS flavor?</title>
	<author>DarKnyht</author>
	<datestamp>1269443460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Their website (not the news story) just points out the OS'es that could run on their machine.  However I don't think they install anything on the system itself.  Under OS X, it points out that you will need to go to the Apple Store yourself like they do and links to articles on the devices needed to get around the protections.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Their website ( not the news story ) just points out the OS'es that could run on their machine .
However I do n't think they install anything on the system itself .
Under OS X , it points out that you will need to go to the Apple Store yourself like they do and links to articles on the devices needed to get around the protections .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their website (not the news story) just points out the OS'es that could run on their machine.
However I don't think they install anything on the system itself.
Under OS X, it points out that you will need to go to the Apple Store yourself like they do and links to articles on the devices needed to get around the protections.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596574</id>
	<title>Why not Commodore 65</title>
	<author>chipxsd</author>
	<datestamp>1269440280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh, how I wish CBM would release the C65 in the nineties. I grew up with C64, and I know every corner of its hardware and the limitations. C65 would be a right balance between A500 and C64.

I wonder what kind of games would be developed for it, and imagine the demoscene, if C65 existed!

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodore\_65" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodore\_65</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , how I wish CBM would release the C65 in the nineties .
I grew up with C64 , and I know every corner of its hardware and the limitations .
C65 would be a right balance between A500 and C64 .
I wonder what kind of games would be developed for it , and imagine the demoscene , if C65 existed !
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodore \ _65 [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, how I wish CBM would release the C65 in the nineties.
I grew up with C64, and I know every corner of its hardware and the limitations.
C65 would be a right balance between A500 and C64.
I wonder what kind of games would be developed for it, and imagine the demoscene, if C65 existed!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodore\_65 [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597482</id>
	<title>Re:Clear Hoax</title>
	<author>Snowbat</author>
	<datestamp>1269445020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I think it is legit enough.  Commodore USA is a registered company in the United States, and their site is quite clearly commodoreusa.net</p></div><p>A domain registered by Domains by Proxy, Inc.?  It doesn't exactly inspire confidence.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it is legit enough .
Commodore USA is a registered company in the United States , and their site is quite clearly commodoreusa.netA domain registered by Domains by Proxy , Inc. ?
It does n't exactly inspire confidence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it is legit enough.
Commodore USA is a registered company in the United States, and their site is quite clearly commodoreusa.netA domain registered by Domains by Proxy, Inc.?
It doesn't exactly inspire confidence.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596124</id>
	<title>E-Mail From America</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1269437460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am Junis, a refugee from the last regime of the United States.  Our former oppressors ridiculed Commodore machines and as such I had hid my 2010 Commodore 64 behind my meager 65" LCD Television.  Had it been found, I might have been criticized for buying such a brand of computer by my peers.  <br> <br>

I could still see the dust of the pick-up trucks carrying Dell computers out of my village and some friends and I went and dug through the PS3, XBox 360 and Wii cables by the LCD TV where I had hid the computer. They might have derided or laughed at us if they'd found it. It was forbidden, although they used Sega Dreamcasts all of the time.  I am now furiously trying to download internets and libraries of congress I've missed from countries like Iran and North Korea.  With the changing of the television seasons, "American Idol" and "Lost" are slowly returning to the television stations.  Justice, Freedom &amp; Liberty have finally come to my hometown in the United States.  <br> <br>

Thankfully and sincerely, <br>
Junis<br>
(sent from my new Commodore 64)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am Junis , a refugee from the last regime of the United States .
Our former oppressors ridiculed Commodore machines and as such I had hid my 2010 Commodore 64 behind my meager 65 " LCD Television .
Had it been found , I might have been criticized for buying such a brand of computer by my peers .
I could still see the dust of the pick-up trucks carrying Dell computers out of my village and some friends and I went and dug through the PS3 , XBox 360 and Wii cables by the LCD TV where I had hid the computer .
They might have derided or laughed at us if they 'd found it .
It was forbidden , although they used Sega Dreamcasts all of the time .
I am now furiously trying to download internets and libraries of congress I 've missed from countries like Iran and North Korea .
With the changing of the television seasons , " American Idol " and " Lost " are slowly returning to the television stations .
Justice , Freedom &amp; Liberty have finally come to my hometown in the United States .
Thankfully and sincerely , Junis ( sent from my new Commodore 64 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am Junis, a refugee from the last regime of the United States.
Our former oppressors ridiculed Commodore machines and as such I had hid my 2010 Commodore 64 behind my meager 65" LCD Television.
Had it been found, I might have been criticized for buying such a brand of computer by my peers.
I could still see the dust of the pick-up trucks carrying Dell computers out of my village and some friends and I went and dug through the PS3, XBox 360 and Wii cables by the LCD TV where I had hid the computer.
They might have derided or laughed at us if they'd found it.
It was forbidden, although they used Sega Dreamcasts all of the time.
I am now furiously trying to download internets and libraries of congress I've missed from countries like Iran and North Korea.
With the changing of the television seasons, "American Idol" and "Lost" are slowly returning to the television stations.
Justice, Freedom &amp; Liberty have finally come to my hometown in the United States.
Thankfully and sincerely, 
Junis
(sent from my new Commodore 64)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595988</id>
	<title>What's the point??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269436680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really, what's the point.</p><p>Well, I had a Commodore 64 (or was it a Vic=20, never knew the difference and I was barely old enough to use it)</p><p>The age of different consumer computer archs is over, unfortunatelly, gone with the last Apple PPC. It made sense on those days, but now...</p><p>I don't see the point of grabbing a PC and slapping a C64 sticker on it. At least it should come with a C64 emulator<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really , what 's the point.Well , I had a Commodore 64 ( or was it a Vic = 20 , never knew the difference and I was barely old enough to use it ) The age of different consumer computer archs is over , unfortunatelly , gone with the last Apple PPC .
It made sense on those days , but now...I do n't see the point of grabbing a PC and slapping a C64 sticker on it .
At least it should come with a C64 emulator : P : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really, what's the point.Well, I had a Commodore 64 (or was it a Vic=20, never knew the difference and I was barely old enough to use it)The age of different consumer computer archs is over, unfortunatelly, gone with the last Apple PPC.
It made sense on those days, but now...I don't see the point of grabbing a PC and slapping a C64 sticker on it.
At least it should come with a C64 emulator :P :P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596298</id>
	<title>What it really is</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269438540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Casemod.</p><p>nothing more, nothing less. a Wintel-PC with funny hat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Casemod.nothing more , nothing less .
a Wintel-PC with funny hat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Casemod.nothing more, nothing less.
a Wintel-PC with funny hat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597228</id>
	<title>It claims OS X support?</title>
	<author>benwiggy</author>
	<datestamp>1269444060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you go to the company's website, on the link in the article, they claim it will run OS X. Interesting to see how quickly Apple's lawyers move in for the kill</p><p>Oh, and I submitted this story to Slashdot a week ago. Tsk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you go to the company 's website , on the link in the article , they claim it will run OS X. Interesting to see how quickly Apple 's lawyers move in for the killOh , and I submitted this story to Slashdot a week ago .
Tsk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you go to the company's website, on the link in the article, they claim it will run OS X. Interesting to see how quickly Apple's lawyers move in for the killOh, and I submitted this story to Slashdot a week ago.
Tsk.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31599068</id>
	<title>Strange corporate ties</title>
	<author>Zippy\_wonderslug</author>
	<datestamp>1269450780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The phone number on the Contact Us section of the website belongs to Homecraft a furniture company. Don't know if they would be using the same manufacturing process, but the website looks just as cheap. <a href="http://www.homecraft.us/contact\_us.html" title="homecraft.us" rel="nofollow">http://www.homecraft.us/contact\_us.html</a> [homecraft.us]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The phone number on the Contact Us section of the website belongs to Homecraft a furniture company .
Do n't know if they would be using the same manufacturing process , but the website looks just as cheap .
http : //www.homecraft.us/contact \ _us.html [ homecraft.us ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The phone number on the Contact Us section of the website belongs to Homecraft a furniture company.
Don't know if they would be using the same manufacturing process, but the website looks just as cheap.
http://www.homecraft.us/contact\_us.html [homecraft.us]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595964</id>
	<title>This is not a C64 at all</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269436500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The computer will be an all-in-one keyboard, with Intel's 64-bit quad-core microprocessors and 3D graphics capabilities.</p></div><p>So how is it a C64 then? I bet it doesn't even have 64K of RAM.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The computer will be an all-in-one keyboard , with Intel 's 64-bit quad-core microprocessors and 3D graphics capabilities.So how is it a C64 then ?
I bet it does n't even have 64K of RAM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The computer will be an all-in-one keyboard, with Intel's 64-bit quad-core microprocessors and 3D graphics capabilities.So how is it a C64 then?
I bet it doesn't even have 64K of RAM.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596360</id>
	<title>This is simply a Cybernet ZPC-GX31 system</title>
	<author>HonestButCurious</author>
	<datestamp>1269439080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Circa March 2008:<br><a href="http://www.cybernetman.com/en/products/zero-footprint-pc/zpc-gx31.cfm" title="cybernetman.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cybernetman.com/en/products/zero-footprint-pc/zpc-gx31.cfm</a> [cybernetman.com]<br>They even reused the stock footage.<br>Should cost at least $700, according to Gizmodo Australia:<br><a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/cybernet\_zpcgx31\_a\_pc\_in\_a\_keyboardsized\_case-2/" title="gizmodo.com.au" rel="nofollow">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/cybernet\_zpcgx31\_a\_pc\_in\_a\_keyboardsized\_case-2/</a> [gizmodo.com.au]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Circa March 2008 : http : //www.cybernetman.com/en/products/zero-footprint-pc/zpc-gx31.cfm [ cybernetman.com ] They even reused the stock footage.Should cost at least $ 700 , according to Gizmodo Australia : http : //www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/cybernet \ _zpcgx31 \ _a \ _pc \ _in \ _a \ _keyboardsized \ _case-2/ [ gizmodo.com.au ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Circa March 2008:http://www.cybernetman.com/en/products/zero-footprint-pc/zpc-gx31.cfm [cybernetman.com]They even reused the stock footage.Should cost at least $700, according to Gizmodo Australia:http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/03/cybernet\_zpcgx31\_a\_pc\_in\_a\_keyboardsized\_case-2/ [gizmodo.com.au]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596588</id>
	<title>Re:Clear Hoax</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269440340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't say it's a hoax... This keyboard PC has been on the market for years. <a href="http://www.cybernetman.com/en/products/zero-footprint-pc/" title="cybernetman.com">This company</a> [cybernetman.com] sells it as the ZPC (for Zero-footprint PC).</p><p>Frankly, I wondered why it took so long for someone to decide to rebadge one as a Commodore. It was the first thing that came to my mind when I saw it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't say it 's a hoax... This keyboard PC has been on the market for years .
This company [ cybernetman.com ] sells it as the ZPC ( for Zero-footprint PC ) .Frankly , I wondered why it took so long for someone to decide to rebadge one as a Commodore .
It was the first thing that came to my mind when I saw it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't say it's a hoax... This keyboard PC has been on the market for years.
This company [cybernetman.com] sells it as the ZPC (for Zero-footprint PC).Frankly, I wondered why it took so long for someone to decide to rebadge one as a Commodore.
It was the first thing that came to my mind when I saw it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596228</id>
	<title>Re:Pick your OS flavor?</title>
	<author>gid</author>
	<datestamp>1269438060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which is exactly the reason why I will never own an Apple computer, iPod, iTouch, iPad, iPhone, iMac, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which is exactly the reason why I will never own an Apple computer , iPod , iTouch , iPad , iPhone , iMac , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which is exactly the reason why I will never own an Apple computer, iPod, iTouch, iPad, iPhone, iMac, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596518</id>
	<title>Re:A Commodore In Name Only</title>
	<author>tverbeek</author>
	<datestamp>1269439980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because most of the millions of people who bought a C64 don't know or care about what happened with the Amiga.  Adolf, on the other handm doesn't have any nostalgic associations for most people, and his ignoble legacy is a little better known, so your comparison is a bit of a stretch.</p><p>And according to corollaries to Godwin's Law: you lose.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because most of the millions of people who bought a C64 do n't know or care about what happened with the Amiga .
Adolf , on the other handm does n't have any nostalgic associations for most people , and his ignoble legacy is a little better known , so your comparison is a bit of a stretch.And according to corollaries to Godwin 's Law : you lose .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because most of the millions of people who bought a C64 don't know or care about what happened with the Amiga.
Adolf, on the other handm doesn't have any nostalgic associations for most people, and his ignoble legacy is a little better known, so your comparison is a bit of a stretch.And according to corollaries to Godwin's Law: you lose.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31607570</id>
	<title>Press release a week early</title>
	<author>LandGator</author>
	<datestamp>1269457140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wasn't this press release dated 2010-04-01 ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't this press release dated 2010-04-01 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't this press release dated 2010-04-01 ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596372</id>
	<title>Re:Clear Hoax</title>
	<author>quantumpineal</author>
	<datestamp>1269439200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds a bit like an Xbox?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds a bit like an Xbox ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds a bit like an Xbox?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600824</id>
	<title>Re:I already have one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269457500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm, gets out sharpie..</p><p>Cool I have a cray now!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , gets out sharpie..Cool I have a cray now !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, gets out sharpie..Cool I have a cray now!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596080</id>
	<title>Re:Riding the back of nostalgia.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269437280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most likely, I've seen computers that were built completely into the keyboard in recent years, but they haven't taken off. I'd be shocked if the name would be enough to change that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most likely , I 've seen computers that were built completely into the keyboard in recent years , but they have n't taken off .
I 'd be shocked if the name would be enough to change that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most likely, I've seen computers that were built completely into the keyboard in recent years, but they haven't taken off.
I'd be shocked if the name would be enough to change that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595954</id>
	<title>64-bit?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269436500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>with Intel's 64-bit quad-core microprocessors and 3D graphics capabilities</p></div></blockquote><p>Then it's not a Commodore 64, it's just a modern product trying to cash in on the famous name.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>with Intel 's 64-bit quad-core microprocessors and 3D graphics capabilitiesThen it 's not a Commodore 64 , it 's just a modern product trying to cash in on the famous name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>with Intel's 64-bit quad-core microprocessors and 3D graphics capabilitiesThen it's not a Commodore 64, it's just a modern product trying to cash in on the famous name.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597466</id>
	<title>Re:A Mac In Name Only</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1269444960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's see, imagine this posted to a story about the latest "Mac":</p><p>"TFA says it's an Intel x86 based machine running OS X. The only thing Mac about this thing is that it's got an Apple logo, and even that's a stretch. This is a Mac in name only."</p><p>(And I presume you meant Commodore 64 - you seem to be forgetting that Commodore was a company - <i>and they made PCs!</i>)</p><p>Yes, thank you Captain Obvious, yes, you are right that just because it shares the trademark doesn't mean it's exactly the same product. Welcome to the world of business - that's how it works for just about everything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's see , imagine this posted to a story about the latest " Mac " : " TFA says it 's an Intel x86 based machine running OS X. The only thing Mac about this thing is that it 's got an Apple logo , and even that 's a stretch .
This is a Mac in name only .
" ( And I presume you meant Commodore 64 - you seem to be forgetting that Commodore was a company - and they made PCs !
) Yes , thank you Captain Obvious , yes , you are right that just because it shares the trademark does n't mean it 's exactly the same product .
Welcome to the world of business - that 's how it works for just about everything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's see, imagine this posted to a story about the latest "Mac":"TFA says it's an Intel x86 based machine running OS X. The only thing Mac about this thing is that it's got an Apple logo, and even that's a stretch.
This is a Mac in name only.
"(And I presume you meant Commodore 64 - you seem to be forgetting that Commodore was a company - and they made PCs!
)Yes, thank you Captain Obvious, yes, you are right that just because it shares the trademark doesn't mean it's exactly the same product.
Welcome to the world of business - that's how it works for just about everything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595990</id>
	<title>is the Atari 2600 coming back too!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269436680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>good heavens!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>good heavens !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>good heavens!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596218</id>
	<title>Re:Riding the back of nostalgia.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269438000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I see no reason for this particular outfit to succeed(keyboard computers are a niche, the C64 name isn't worth paying any extra for, Asus's oddball EEEboard will be out real soon now, etc.); but, the product itself has been around for some years now, which suggests that it is still making money, albeit in a niche.<br> <br>

Unless the latest outfit wearing a mask made from Commodore's flayed face is simply stealing clip art, what they are selling is a simple rebadge of Cybernet's <a href="http://www.cybernetman.com/en/products/zero-footprint-pc/" title="cybernetman.com">"ZPC"</a> [cybernetman.com]. Those things have been around at least since the P4 was the face of "intel inside" possibly earlier. Unless Cybernet is an ass about small quantities or something, there is absolutely no reason to order from some fly-by-night rebadge house; but the product is real enough, and presumably has enough of a niche(probably space constrained POS applications and similar) to justify the engineering costs of shoving a laptop motherboard into a keyboard housing for the past few generations of x86 hardware.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I see no reason for this particular outfit to succeed ( keyboard computers are a niche , the C64 name is n't worth paying any extra for , Asus 's oddball EEEboard will be out real soon now , etc .
) ; but , the product itself has been around for some years now , which suggests that it is still making money , albeit in a niche .
Unless the latest outfit wearing a mask made from Commodore 's flayed face is simply stealing clip art , what they are selling is a simple rebadge of Cybernet 's " ZPC " [ cybernetman.com ] .
Those things have been around at least since the P4 was the face of " intel inside " possibly earlier .
Unless Cybernet is an ass about small quantities or something , there is absolutely no reason to order from some fly-by-night rebadge house ; but the product is real enough , and presumably has enough of a niche ( probably space constrained POS applications and similar ) to justify the engineering costs of shoving a laptop motherboard into a keyboard housing for the past few generations of x86 hardware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see no reason for this particular outfit to succeed(keyboard computers are a niche, the C64 name isn't worth paying any extra for, Asus's oddball EEEboard will be out real soon now, etc.
); but, the product itself has been around for some years now, which suggests that it is still making money, albeit in a niche.
Unless the latest outfit wearing a mask made from Commodore's flayed face is simply stealing clip art, what they are selling is a simple rebadge of Cybernet's "ZPC" [cybernetman.com].
Those things have been around at least since the P4 was the face of "intel inside" possibly earlier.
Unless Cybernet is an ass about small quantities or something, there is absolutely no reason to order from some fly-by-night rebadge house; but the product is real enough, and presumably has enough of a niche(probably space constrained POS applications and similar) to justify the engineering costs of shoving a laptop motherboard into a keyboard housing for the past few generations of x86 hardware.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596088</id>
	<title>Re:64-bit?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269437280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whew! Thanks for clearing up that misunderstanding for us. I mean, I don't think I was alone in thinking that a computer with an Intel 64-bit quad-core cpu was a Commodore 64. Internet needs more people like you to stop people from trying to cash in on famous names from spreading their disinformation!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whew !
Thanks for clearing up that misunderstanding for us .
I mean , I do n't think I was alone in thinking that a computer with an Intel 64-bit quad-core cpu was a Commodore 64 .
Internet needs more people like you to stop people from trying to cash in on famous names from spreading their disinformation !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whew!
Thanks for clearing up that misunderstanding for us.
I mean, I don't think I was alone in thinking that a computer with an Intel 64-bit quad-core cpu was a Commodore 64.
Internet needs more people like you to stop people from trying to cash in on famous names from spreading their disinformation!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600954</id>
	<title>To all the smarts pants that says this is just a "</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269457980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To all the smarts pants that says this is just a "ZPC"  rebadged<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</p><p>Yes, you are right... AND SO WHAT?</p><p>I will shed some tears having one plugged to my 22" monitor, after all that machines and all machines from that time kicked into the wonderful hobby of debugging... err programming.</p><p>If you don't like them, vote with your wallet... But if you are an old fart as me, just fire this with a ruby interpreter and pretend you are back to the nices times while you were writing your own pacman with letter "C" as main character in the play, (Hey I'm nostalgic but not idiotic I will not touch commodore basic with a stick nowadays<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-) )</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To all the smarts pants that says this is just a " ZPC " rebadged ....Yes , you are right... AND SO WHAT ? I will shed some tears having one plugged to my 22 " monitor , after all that machines and all machines from that time kicked into the wonderful hobby of debugging... err programming.If you do n't like them , vote with your wallet... But if you are an old fart as me , just fire this with a ruby interpreter and pretend you are back to the nices times while you were writing your own pacman with letter " C " as main character in the play , ( Hey I 'm nostalgic but not idiotic I will not touch commodore basic with a stick nowadays ; - ) )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To all the smarts pants that says this is just a "ZPC"  rebadged ....Yes, you are right... AND SO WHAT?I will shed some tears having one plugged to my 22" monitor, after all that machines and all machines from that time kicked into the wonderful hobby of debugging... err programming.If you don't like them, vote with your wallet... But if you are an old fart as me, just fire this with a ruby interpreter and pretend you are back to the nices times while you were writing your own pacman with letter "C" as main character in the play, (Hey I'm nostalgic but not idiotic I will not touch commodore basic with a stick nowadays ;-) )</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596320</id>
	<title>Re:Commodore 64?</title>
	<author>Inschato</author>
	<datestamp>1269438720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In this case, the 64 obviously stands for 64-bit processor, much like the Nintendo 64.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In this case , the 64 obviously stands for 64-bit processor , much like the Nintendo 64 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In this case, the 64 obviously stands for 64-bit processor, much like the Nintendo 64.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600680</id>
	<title>Re:64-bit?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269456840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>agreed, unless it will run my old c64 games nativly, its not a c64.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>agreed , unless it will run my old c64 games nativly , its not a c64 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>agreed, unless it will run my old c64 games nativly, its not a c64.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597178</id>
	<title>Re:Commodore 64?</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1269443820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Commodore 64 had 64K of RAM.  That would make this thing the Commodore 4194304.</p><p>If they're going to call this thing a Commodore, they should at least make it boot into BASIC.  Or maybe build in one of those C64s on a chip.  That might make it worth an enthusiasts time.  Otherwise, I'll pass on this one.  I have a C128 anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Commodore 64 had 64K of RAM .
That would make this thing the Commodore 4194304.If they 're going to call this thing a Commodore , they should at least make it boot into BASIC .
Or maybe build in one of those C64s on a chip .
That might make it worth an enthusiasts time .
Otherwise , I 'll pass on this one .
I have a C128 anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Commodore 64 had 64K of RAM.
That would make this thing the Commodore 4194304.If they're going to call this thing a Commodore, they should at least make it boot into BASIC.
Or maybe build in one of those C64s on a chip.
That might make it worth an enthusiasts time.
Otherwise, I'll pass on this one.
I have a C128 anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597320</id>
	<title>That ain't a C64</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269444360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>load"*",8,1</p><p>'load"*"' is not recognized as an internal or external command,<br>operable program or batch file.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>load " * " ,8,1'load " * " ' is not recognized as an internal or external command,operable program or batch file .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>load"*",8,1'load"*"' is not recognized as an internal or external command,operable program or batch file.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597558</id>
	<title>Re:I already have one</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1269445320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed, why not? Apple have been doing this for years, putting Apple stickers on PCs and selling them as Macs. Why is it always the Commdore (and Amiga) stories that for some reason this isn't allowed?</p><p>Personally I'm running an Amiga with 4 cores, 4GB RAM, NVIDIA graphics and running Windows 7.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed , why not ?
Apple have been doing this for years , putting Apple stickers on PCs and selling them as Macs .
Why is it always the Commdore ( and Amiga ) stories that for some reason this is n't allowed ? Personally I 'm running an Amiga with 4 cores , 4GB RAM , NVIDIA graphics and running Windows 7 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed, why not?
Apple have been doing this for years, putting Apple stickers on PCs and selling them as Macs.
Why is it always the Commdore (and Amiga) stories that for some reason this isn't allowed?Personally I'm running an Amiga with 4 cores, 4GB RAM, NVIDIA graphics and running Windows 7.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596572</id>
	<title>Re:Clear Hoax</title>
	<author>GodfatherofSoul</author>
	<datestamp>1269440280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is the new Slashdot.  Are you really *that* surprised?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the new Slashdot .
Are you really * that * surprised ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the new Slashdot.
Are you really *that* surprised?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31601124</id>
	<title>Did I fall asleep?</title>
	<author>MrWin2kMan</author>
	<datestamp>1269458580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The hardware specs are dated....soooooo last decade.......and the industrial design is clunky. Clearly not ready for prime time. It doesn't look any different than the OEM all-in-one's I've seen advertised in the back of eWeek for years.
LGA775? It does use a SATA HDD, but PATA for the DVD, which really should be a slot load. A modem is bad enough, but parallel, serial and PS/2 ports? C'mon, this design's Use-by date has expired.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The hardware specs are dated....soooooo last decade.......and the industrial design is clunky .
Clearly not ready for prime time .
It does n't look any different than the OEM all-in-one 's I 've seen advertised in the back of eWeek for years .
LGA775 ? It does use a SATA HDD , but PATA for the DVD , which really should be a slot load .
A modem is bad enough , but parallel , serial and PS/2 ports ?
C'mon , this design 's Use-by date has expired .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The hardware specs are dated....soooooo last decade.......and the industrial design is clunky.
Clearly not ready for prime time.
It doesn't look any different than the OEM all-in-one's I've seen advertised in the back of eWeek for years.
LGA775? It does use a SATA HDD, but PATA for the DVD, which really should be a slot load.
A modem is bad enough, but parallel, serial and PS/2 ports?
C'mon, this design's Use-by date has expired.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600920</id>
	<title>Re:Nope, not a commodore</title>
	<author>phantomfive</author>
	<datestamp>1269457860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, even just reading that I can smell my old C64 in my mind.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , even just reading that I can smell my old C64 in my mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, even just reading that I can smell my old C64 in my mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596382</id>
	<title>Re:Not really a comeback</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269439260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually it doesn't run Linux I've heard they ported GEOS to 64bit</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually it does n't run Linux I 've heard they ported GEOS to 64bit</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually it doesn't run Linux I've heard they ported GEOS to 64bit</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596296</id>
	<title>Re:Pick your OS flavor?</title>
	<author>Rallias Ubernerd</author>
	<datestamp>1269438540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Really? 2 corrections. Mac OSX not supported (according to the website). And Linux is a kernal, not an OS</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
2 corrections .
Mac OSX not supported ( according to the website ) .
And Linux is a kernal , not an OS</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
2 corrections.
Mac OSX not supported (according to the website).
And Linux is a kernal, not an OS</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600792</id>
	<title>Bah! Quad processors...</title>
	<author>plopez</author>
	<datestamp>1269457320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it doesn't have a 6501/6502 processor it isn't a C64. We had a nice tight 8-bit instruction set. And we liked it! It was easy to learn.</p><p>And kids these days, most of them have never poked a computer. What's up with that? [1]</p><p>We had a whopping 64K of ram. And we liked.</p><p>We had an expansion slots. And we liked it! We had 5" floppy drives. None these new fangled hard drives. And we liked it! [2]</p><p>Mine had some add on software that turned the keyboard into a synthesizer, complete with plastic keyboard overlay. It played the Eurythmics "Sweet Dreams Are Made of These". And I liked it!</p><p>Now get off of my lawn!</p><p>[1] That was a joke, intended to appear unintentionally funny (for those of you slow to get it).</p><p>[2] See footnote above.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it does n't have a 6501/6502 processor it is n't a C64 .
We had a nice tight 8-bit instruction set .
And we liked it !
It was easy to learn.And kids these days , most of them have never poked a computer .
What 's up with that ?
[ 1 ] We had a whopping 64K of ram .
And we liked.We had an expansion slots .
And we liked it !
We had 5 " floppy drives .
None these new fangled hard drives .
And we liked it !
[ 2 ] Mine had some add on software that turned the keyboard into a synthesizer , complete with plastic keyboard overlay .
It played the Eurythmics " Sweet Dreams Are Made of These " .
And I liked it ! Now get off of my lawn !
[ 1 ] That was a joke , intended to appear unintentionally funny ( for those of you slow to get it ) .
[ 2 ] See footnote above .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it doesn't have a 6501/6502 processor it isn't a C64.
We had a nice tight 8-bit instruction set.
And we liked it!
It was easy to learn.And kids these days, most of them have never poked a computer.
What's up with that?
[1]We had a whopping 64K of ram.
And we liked.We had an expansion slots.
And we liked it!
We had 5" floppy drives.
None these new fangled hard drives.
And we liked it!
[2]Mine had some add on software that turned the keyboard into a synthesizer, complete with plastic keyboard overlay.
It played the Eurythmics "Sweet Dreams Are Made of These".
And I liked it!Now get off of my lawn!
[1] That was a joke, intended to appear unintentionally funny (for those of you slow to get it).
[2] See footnote above.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596002</id>
	<title>Not really a comeback</title>
	<author>zr-rifle</author>
	<datestamp>1269436740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>... but a rebranding that - put simply - insults the name of the good old '64.<br> <br>Seriously: what does this have to do with the old 8bit microcomputer?<ul> <li>Can I peek or poke the memory?</li><li>Can I play Turrican and Hawkeye on it?</li><li>Does it have a SID?</li><li>Does it even read my old datassettes?</li><li><p>And yes... it does run Linux, sadly... <br> <br>Those wishing to a Commodore 64 should look <a href="http://www.c64upgra.de/c-one/" title="c64upgra.de">elsewhere</a> [c64upgra.de] (or Ellsworth - haha, lame I know...)</p></li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>... but a rebranding that - put simply - insults the name of the good old '64 .
Seriously : what does this have to do with the old 8bit microcomputer ?
Can I peek or poke the memory ? Can I play Turrican and Hawkeye on it ? Does it have a SID ? Does it even read my old datassettes ? And yes... it does run Linux , sadly... Those wishing to a Commodore 64 should look elsewhere [ c64upgra.de ] ( or Ellsworth - haha , lame I know... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... but a rebranding that - put simply - insults the name of the good old '64.
Seriously: what does this have to do with the old 8bit microcomputer?
Can I peek or poke the memory?Can I play Turrican and Hawkeye on it?Does it have a SID?Does it even read my old datassettes?And yes... it does run Linux, sadly...  Those wishing to a Commodore 64 should look elsewhere [c64upgra.de] (or Ellsworth - haha, lame I know...)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595962</id>
	<title>A Commodore In Name Only</title>
	<author>rsmith-mac</author>
	<datestamp>1269436500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TFA says it's an Intel x86 based machine running Windows. The only thing Commodore about this thing is that it's built in to an oversized PC-style keyboard, and even that's a stretch. This is a Commodore in name only.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA says it 's an Intel x86 based machine running Windows .
The only thing Commodore about this thing is that it 's built in to an oversized PC-style keyboard , and even that 's a stretch .
This is a Commodore in name only .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA says it's an Intel x86 based machine running Windows.
The only thing Commodore about this thing is that it's built in to an oversized PC-style keyboard, and even that's a stretch.
This is a Commodore in name only.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596480</id>
	<title>Re:Clear Hoax</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269439800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I EXIF metadata of the picture shows a date taken of 12/2006.  But the model of camera is a Phase One P45 which is NOT cheap at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I EXIF metadata of the picture shows a date taken of 12/2006 .
But the model of camera is a Phase One P45 which is NOT cheap at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I EXIF metadata of the picture shows a date taken of 12/2006.
But the model of camera is a Phase One P45 which is NOT cheap at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31598330
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597532
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597378
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31598902
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596480
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31598634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31598256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31598218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31599104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31608516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596088
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31602666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596088
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_24_0625211_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596088
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31602666
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597062
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595932
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31598902
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597168
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596352
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597482
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596480
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596164
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596242
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596372
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596112
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595984
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596080
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31598218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597656
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31598330
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596060
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596228
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597130
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31601124
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595962
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597466
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596180
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596518
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31608516
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600824
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596428
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596932
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597378
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596566
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600920
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596298
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595996
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596024
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597532
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596310
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597998
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596082
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596326
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597590
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596076
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31598256
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596882
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595934
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597178
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31599104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596320
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597228
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596574
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31600188
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597610
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595988
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31595990
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596746
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596122
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596916
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_24_0625211.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31596358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31598634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_24_0625211.31597318
</commentlist>
</conversation>
