<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_23_1323204</id>
	<title>Bill Gates May Build Small Nuclear Reactor</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1269356100000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hughpickens.com/" rel="nofollow">Hugh Pickens</a> writes <i>"TerraPower, an energy start-up backed by Microsoft  co-founder <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8582692.stm">Bill Gates, is in discussions with Toshiba Corp. to develop a small-scale nuclear reactor</a> that would represent a long-term bet to make nuclear power safer and cheaper. Toshiba confirmed it is in preliminary discussions with TerraPower, a unit of Intellectual Ventures, a patent-holding concern partially funded by Gates. Toshiba spokesman Keisuke Ohmori says the two sides are talking about how they could collaborate on nuclear technology, although discussions are still in early stages and that nothing has been decided on investment or development. TerraPower has publicly said its <a href="http://www.intellectualventures.com/docs/terrappower/IV\_Introducing\%20TWR\_February\%202010.pdf">Traveling Wave Reactor could run for decades on depleted uranium without refueling</a> (PDF) or removing spent fuel from the device. The reactor, the company has said, could be safer, cheaper and more socially acceptable than today's reactors. Gates's recent focus on nuclear power has been fueled by an interest in developing new power systems for developing countries where he says that new energy solutions are needed to combat climate change. Terrapower faces a lengthy, multi-year process to get its "traveling wave" reactor concept reviewed by regulators but if TerraPower succeeds in advancing its plans, it <a href="http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2010/02/nuclear\_energy\_project\_terrapower\_raising\_its\_profile.html">could provide an alternative blueprint for the nuclear industry</a> at a time when new reactors may be coming online."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hugh Pickens writes " TerraPower , an energy start-up backed by Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates , is in discussions with Toshiba Corp. to develop a small-scale nuclear reactor that would represent a long-term bet to make nuclear power safer and cheaper .
Toshiba confirmed it is in preliminary discussions with TerraPower , a unit of Intellectual Ventures , a patent-holding concern partially funded by Gates .
Toshiba spokesman Keisuke Ohmori says the two sides are talking about how they could collaborate on nuclear technology , although discussions are still in early stages and that nothing has been decided on investment or development .
TerraPower has publicly said its Traveling Wave Reactor could run for decades on depleted uranium without refueling ( PDF ) or removing spent fuel from the device .
The reactor , the company has said , could be safer , cheaper and more socially acceptable than today 's reactors .
Gates 's recent focus on nuclear power has been fueled by an interest in developing new power systems for developing countries where he says that new energy solutions are needed to combat climate change .
Terrapower faces a lengthy , multi-year process to get its " traveling wave " reactor concept reviewed by regulators but if TerraPower succeeds in advancing its plans , it could provide an alternative blueprint for the nuclear industry at a time when new reactors may be coming online .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hugh Pickens writes "TerraPower, an energy start-up backed by Microsoft  co-founder Bill Gates, is in discussions with Toshiba Corp. to develop a small-scale nuclear reactor that would represent a long-term bet to make nuclear power safer and cheaper.
Toshiba confirmed it is in preliminary discussions with TerraPower, a unit of Intellectual Ventures, a patent-holding concern partially funded by Gates.
Toshiba spokesman Keisuke Ohmori says the two sides are talking about how they could collaborate on nuclear technology, although discussions are still in early stages and that nothing has been decided on investment or development.
TerraPower has publicly said its Traveling Wave Reactor could run for decades on depleted uranium without refueling (PDF) or removing spent fuel from the device.
The reactor, the company has said, could be safer, cheaper and more socially acceptable than today's reactors.
Gates's recent focus on nuclear power has been fueled by an interest in developing new power systems for developing countries where he says that new energy solutions are needed to combat climate change.
Terrapower faces a lengthy, multi-year process to get its "traveling wave" reactor concept reviewed by regulators but if TerraPower succeeds in advancing its plans, it could provide an alternative blueprint for the nuclear industry at a time when new reactors may be coming online.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586594</id>
	<title>We are all doomed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269370380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems interesting to me that Bill would firstly invest in the poor africans health and nothing more, Warren Buffet would add a cool 40 billion to that, in spite of the fact that every business man knows that you don't hold all your eggs in one basket. Do they really care about the poor africans if all they're interested is just health? Why no food? Bush wanted food on the children. Bush is better then Bill. Or are they just money grubbing addicts who want a piece of the pharmaceutical industry? Now this, energy and pharmaceuticals. Bill goes after the biggest 2 money makers out there and it doesn't take a scientist to realize that a man capable of walking over graves for a nickle would not care about people.<br>Bill if you're reading this:<br>You can take it with you in the grave provided that you have big enough pockets. Just look up pharaohs. And if you're worried that no one would show up just promise you leave them something<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems interesting to me that Bill would firstly invest in the poor africans health and nothing more , Warren Buffet would add a cool 40 billion to that , in spite of the fact that every business man knows that you do n't hold all your eggs in one basket .
Do they really care about the poor africans if all they 're interested is just health ?
Why no food ?
Bush wanted food on the children .
Bush is better then Bill .
Or are they just money grubbing addicts who want a piece of the pharmaceutical industry ?
Now this , energy and pharmaceuticals .
Bill goes after the biggest 2 money makers out there and it does n't take a scientist to realize that a man capable of walking over graves for a nickle would not care about people.Bill if you 're reading this : You can take it with you in the grave provided that you have big enough pockets .
Just look up pharaohs .
And if you 're worried that no one would show up just promise you leave them something ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems interesting to me that Bill would firstly invest in the poor africans health and nothing more, Warren Buffet would add a cool 40 billion to that, in spite of the fact that every business man knows that you don't hold all your eggs in one basket.
Do they really care about the poor africans if all they're interested is just health?
Why no food?
Bush wanted food on the children.
Bush is better then Bill.
Or are they just money grubbing addicts who want a piece of the pharmaceutical industry?
Now this, energy and pharmaceuticals.
Bill goes after the biggest 2 money makers out there and it doesn't take a scientist to realize that a man capable of walking over graves for a nickle would not care about people.Bill if you're reading this:You can take it with you in the grave provided that you have big enough pockets.
Just look up pharaohs.
And if you're worried that no one would show up just promise you leave them something ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584134</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>NonUniqueNickname</author>
	<datestamp>1269361080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course he's not going to build it <i>personally</i>. He's going to take someone else's work, put a few 8.3mm screws into it, and say he built it himself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course he 's not going to build it personally .
He 's going to take someone else 's work , put a few 8.3mm screws into it , and say he built it himself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course he's not going to build it personally.
He's going to take someone else's work, put a few 8.3mm screws into it, and say he built it himself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584474</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>Idarubicin</author>
	<datestamp>1269362400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Troll much?
<p>
Gates' actual quote:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>&ldquo;if we do a really great job on vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that [his initial 2050 global population projection of 9-billion] by perhaps about 10 to 15 percent.&rdquo;</p></div><p>
Sure, I suppose that <i>could</i> mean that he advocates surreptitiously sterilizing Third-World women under the guise of providing health services.
</p><p>
But what it <i>probably</i> means is that he believes societies with better access to health care have a greater fraction of children survive to adulthood and see far, far, far fewer of their women die in childbirth.  Access to birth control permits women to space out their children more, with benefits to the health of mother and child.  Those societies (like, say, the villianous dystopias of Canada and Switzerland) tend to have lower overall birth rates and stable populations.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Troll much ?
Gates ' actual quote :    if we do a really great job on vaccines , health care , reproductive health services , we could lower that [ his initial 2050 global population projection of 9-billion ] by perhaps about 10 to 15 percent.    Sure , I suppose that could mean that he advocates surreptitiously sterilizing Third-World women under the guise of providing health services .
But what it probably means is that he believes societies with better access to health care have a greater fraction of children survive to adulthood and see far , far , far fewer of their women die in childbirth .
Access to birth control permits women to space out their children more , with benefits to the health of mother and child .
Those societies ( like , say , the villianous dystopias of Canada and Switzerland ) tend to have lower overall birth rates and stable populations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Troll much?
Gates' actual quote:“if we do a really great job on vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that [his initial 2050 global population projection of 9-billion] by perhaps about 10 to 15 percent.”
Sure, I suppose that could mean that he advocates surreptitiously sterilizing Third-World women under the guise of providing health services.
But what it probably means is that he believes societies with better access to health care have a greater fraction of children survive to adulthood and see far, far, far fewer of their women die in childbirth.
Access to birth control permits women to space out their children more, with benefits to the health of mother and child.
Those societies (like, say, the villianous dystopias of Canada and Switzerland) tend to have lower overall birth rates and stable populations.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586698</id>
	<title>Re:Gates is boring</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269370620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whenever I see that commercial with that crazy surfing thing on the cruise ship, or those big fans that simulate skydiving, I think that's the kind of cool shit I'd have in my backyard if I were rich.  Maybe we just don't know what he does.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whenever I see that commercial with that crazy surfing thing on the cruise ship , or those big fans that simulate skydiving , I think that 's the kind of cool shit I 'd have in my backyard if I were rich .
Maybe we just do n't know what he does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whenever I see that commercial with that crazy surfing thing on the cruise ship, or those big fans that simulate skydiving, I think that's the kind of cool shit I'd have in my backyard if I were rich.
Maybe we just don't know what he does.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583784</id>
	<title>FTFS</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1269359760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Toshiba confirmed it is in preliminary discussions with TerraPower, a unit of Intellectual Ventures, a patent-holding concern partially funded by Gates and Toshiba spokesman Keisuke Ohmori says the two sides are talking about how they could collaborate on nuclear technology although discussions are still in early stages and that nothing has been decided on investment or development.</p> </div><p>Run-on sentence much?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Toshiba confirmed it is in preliminary discussions with TerraPower , a unit of Intellectual Ventures , a patent-holding concern partially funded by Gates and Toshiba spokesman Keisuke Ohmori says the two sides are talking about how they could collaborate on nuclear technology although discussions are still in early stages and that nothing has been decided on investment or development .
Run-on sentence much ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Toshiba confirmed it is in preliminary discussions with TerraPower, a unit of Intellectual Ventures, a patent-holding concern partially funded by Gates and Toshiba spokesman Keisuke Ohmori says the two sides are talking about how they could collaborate on nuclear technology although discussions are still in early stages and that nothing has been decided on investment or development.
Run-on sentence much?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31590336</id>
	<title>Re:Scientific American on fusion...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269343740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're hilariously misinformed.</p><p>In a fission reactor, the atoms that fission release NEUTRONS which heat up the working fluid. Same way it works in a fusion reactor. Who modded you up?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're hilariously misinformed.In a fission reactor , the atoms that fission release NEUTRONS which heat up the working fluid .
Same way it works in a fusion reactor .
Who modded you up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're hilariously misinformed.In a fission reactor, the atoms that fission release NEUTRONS which heat up the working fluid.
Same way it works in a fusion reactor.
Who modded you up?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585374</id>
	<title>get ready for the real RRoD</title>
	<author>Locutus</author>
	<datestamp>1269365760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>if he has any kind of input like he's had with developing Windows, we're all in trouble.<br><br>Why is it that this story reminds me of when Intel handed out a classroom full of ClassMate PCs and made a huge photo op of it? You know the one, where later on the world+dog learned Intel had to fly in a huge diesel generator to park outside the classroom because the batteries on the Windows based ClassMate PCs wouldn't last the whole day and mains power was spotty.<br><br>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in\_pictures/7115712.stm<br><br>I see Microsoft having a tough time becoming energy efficient and capable of running on cheap portable devices. Bill Gates knows this so he wants to drop down his reactor pods outside of classrooms around the world so they can run Windows and not pollute like the diesel generators Intel used.<br><br>LoB</htmltext>
<tokenext>if he has any kind of input like he 's had with developing Windows , we 're all in trouble.Why is it that this story reminds me of when Intel handed out a classroom full of ClassMate PCs and made a huge photo op of it ?
You know the one , where later on the world + dog learned Intel had to fly in a huge diesel generator to park outside the classroom because the batteries on the Windows based ClassMate PCs would n't last the whole day and mains power was spotty.http : //news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in \ _pictures/7115712.stmI see Microsoft having a tough time becoming energy efficient and capable of running on cheap portable devices .
Bill Gates knows this so he wants to drop down his reactor pods outside of classrooms around the world so they can run Windows and not pollute like the diesel generators Intel used.LoB</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if he has any kind of input like he's had with developing Windows, we're all in trouble.Why is it that this story reminds me of when Intel handed out a classroom full of ClassMate PCs and made a huge photo op of it?
You know the one, where later on the world+dog learned Intel had to fly in a huge diesel generator to park outside the classroom because the batteries on the Windows based ClassMate PCs wouldn't last the whole day and mains power was spotty.http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in\_pictures/7115712.stmI see Microsoft having a tough time becoming energy efficient and capable of running on cheap portable devices.
Bill Gates knows this so he wants to drop down his reactor pods outside of classrooms around the world so they can run Windows and not pollute like the diesel generators Intel used.LoB</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31593360</id>
	<title>Re:Gates is boring</title>
	<author>Dr. Spork</author>
	<datestamp>1269360660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know that you're trying to be amusing, but there is something really dickish about your comment. Bill Gates is one of very few people in the world who is trying to do the best he can for the least among us. The Gates Foundation has been amazingly effective at matching its resources to where there is real need. They actually do research. You may think that saving people's lives and being a real fucking superhero is boring. Fuck you. You're in denial that it's also within your power to save people's lives. It's actually quite cheap. But I guess something like that is just too boring for you. Sorry, but that means you're a dick.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know that you 're trying to be amusing , but there is something really dickish about your comment .
Bill Gates is one of very few people in the world who is trying to do the best he can for the least among us .
The Gates Foundation has been amazingly effective at matching its resources to where there is real need .
They actually do research .
You may think that saving people 's lives and being a real fucking superhero is boring .
Fuck you .
You 're in denial that it 's also within your power to save people 's lives .
It 's actually quite cheap .
But I guess something like that is just too boring for you .
Sorry , but that means you 're a dick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know that you're trying to be amusing, but there is something really dickish about your comment.
Bill Gates is one of very few people in the world who is trying to do the best he can for the least among us.
The Gates Foundation has been amazingly effective at matching its resources to where there is real need.
They actually do research.
You may think that saving people's lives and being a real fucking superhero is boring.
Fuck you.
You're in denial that it's also within your power to save people's lives.
It's actually quite cheap.
But I guess something like that is just too boring for you.
Sorry, but that means you're a dick.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585722</id>
	<title>Re:Not what we need</title>
	<author>Black Gold Alchemist</author>
	<datestamp>1269366960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is why we will have to build nuclear powerplants on the oceans. Then we will make gasoline from the seawater and CO2 and ship it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why we will have to build nuclear powerplants on the oceans .
Then we will make gasoline from the seawater and CO2 and ship it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why we will have to build nuclear powerplants on the oceans.
Then we will make gasoline from the seawater and CO2 and ship it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585316</id>
	<title>Re:Preemptive military strike</title>
	<author>flowsnake</author>
	<datestamp>1269365640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>640 MK should be hot enough for anybody.</htmltext>
<tokenext>640 MK should be hot enough for anybody .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>640 MK should be hot enough for anybody.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583872</id>
	<title>And so it begins</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269360120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have been waiting for years for Bill Gates to start using his money for something in the mad scientist realm we all knew it was coming. . .</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have been waiting for years for Bill Gates to start using his money for something in the mad scientist realm we all knew it was coming .
. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have been waiting for years for Bill Gates to start using his money for something in the mad scientist realm we all knew it was coming.
. .</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585280</id>
	<title>The beauty of this technology...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269365460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>... is that it's "proliferation-resistant". These reactors use depleted uranium as fuel, and the waste products are such that you can't make nuclear weapons out of them. I suppose there's still a worry about the production of "dirty bombs", but my feeling is that that's more of a concern in theory than reality. From what I've read, it's kind of hard to make a dirty bomb that actually contaminates a wide area.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... is that it 's " proliferation-resistant " .
These reactors use depleted uranium as fuel , and the waste products are such that you ca n't make nuclear weapons out of them .
I suppose there 's still a worry about the production of " dirty bombs " , but my feeling is that that 's more of a concern in theory than reality .
From what I 've read , it 's kind of hard to make a dirty bomb that actually contaminates a wide area .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... is that it's "proliferation-resistant".
These reactors use depleted uranium as fuel, and the waste products are such that you can't make nuclear weapons out of them.
I suppose there's still a worry about the production of "dirty bombs", but my feeling is that that's more of a concern in theory than reality.
From what I've read, it's kind of hard to make a dirty bomb that actually contaminates a wide area.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584368</id>
	<title>Blue Mushroom Cloud of Death???</title>
	<author>Maltheus</author>
	<datestamp>1269361980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Probably has a more complicated activation process than a real reactor too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably has a more complicated activation process than a real reactor too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably has a more complicated activation process than a real reactor too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584432</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>Stiletto</author>
	<datestamp>1269362220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not sure how one can take anything an article says seriously when it starts out with:</p><p>"At a time when anthropogenic global warming (AGW) is becoming broadly recognized as a politically driven, pseudo-scientific power-grab,"</p><p>LOL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure how one can take anything an article says seriously when it starts out with : " At a time when anthropogenic global warming ( AGW ) is becoming broadly recognized as a politically driven , pseudo-scientific power-grab , " LOL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure how one can take anything an article says seriously when it starts out with:"At a time when anthropogenic global warming (AGW) is becoming broadly recognized as a politically driven, pseudo-scientific power-grab,"LOL</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587402</id>
	<title>Re:Depleted Uranium</title>
	<author>khallow</author>
	<datestamp>1269372900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Uh huh. Geneva Conventions already allow for killing of innocents when the military necessity exists (read up on it). This is merely an extension of that idea. You'd have to show that the DU use wasn't militarily necessary first and then that real harm occurred as a result.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Uh huh .
Geneva Conventions already allow for killing of innocents when the military necessity exists ( read up on it ) .
This is merely an extension of that idea .
You 'd have to show that the DU use was n't militarily necessary first and then that real harm occurred as a result .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uh huh.
Geneva Conventions already allow for killing of innocents when the military necessity exists (read up on it).
This is merely an extension of that idea.
You'd have to show that the DU use wasn't militarily necessary first and then that real harm occurred as a result.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583982</id>
	<title>I Don't Know Man</title>
	<author>crymeph0</author>
	<datestamp>1269360480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>In the movies, whenever a billionaire builds a nuclear reactor, James Bond usually has to save the world from his evil schemes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the movies , whenever a billionaire builds a nuclear reactor , James Bond usually has to save the world from his evil schemes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the movies, whenever a billionaire builds a nuclear reactor, James Bond usually has to save the world from his evil schemes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586222</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>IICV</author>
	<datestamp>1269368820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>You can't mod people down for being stupid.</p></div></blockquote><p>I just did!</p><p>Oh wait...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't mod people down for being stupid.I just did ! Oh wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't mod people down for being stupid.I just did!Oh wait...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31599034</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1269450660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suppose he is just "investing" in that hollowed out volcano also eh?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose he is just " investing " in that hollowed out volcano also eh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose he is just "investing" in that hollowed out volcano also eh?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586036</id>
	<title>3am shutdown</title>
	<author>unixguy43</author>
	<datestamp>1269368160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't wait to see what happens when the reactor downloads the latest security updates at 3am, reboots itself, and doesn't come back up because of a bad patch!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't wait to see what happens when the reactor downloads the latest security updates at 3am , reboots itself , and does n't come back up because of a bad patch !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't wait to see what happens when the reactor downloads the latest security updates at 3am, reboots itself, and doesn't come back up because of a bad patch!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584172</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>JDmetro</author>
	<datestamp>1269361200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The comic book super villan also does not build the reactor with his own bare hands. <br> He has henchmen do it for him.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The comic book super villan also does not build the reactor with his own bare hands .
He has henchmen do it for him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The comic book super villan also does not build the reactor with his own bare hands.
He has henchmen do it for him.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586438</id>
	<title>Re:Preemptive military strike</title>
	<author>centuren</author>
	<datestamp>1269369780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't see why anyone would be surprised by this.  He's already a multi-billionaire business tycoon with his own custom-built fortress.  Since the job of Batman is already taken, the transition to supervillain is the next logical step.</p></div><p>But he's SO far behind Larry Ellison in that area.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see why anyone would be surprised by this .
He 's already a multi-billionaire business tycoon with his own custom-built fortress .
Since the job of Batman is already taken , the transition to supervillain is the next logical step.But he 's SO far behind Larry Ellison in that area .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see why anyone would be surprised by this.
He's already a multi-billionaire business tycoon with his own custom-built fortress.
Since the job of Batman is already taken, the transition to supervillain is the next logical step.But he's SO far behind Larry Ellison in that area.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584010</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>balbord</author>
	<datestamp>1269360600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's just something a loyal minion would say to cover his/her/its boss evil doings.<br>I'm stockpiling twinkies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's just something a loyal minion would say to cover his/her/its boss evil doings.I 'm stockpiling twinkies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's just something a loyal minion would say to cover his/her/its boss evil doings.I'm stockpiling twinkies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584316</id>
	<title>Toshiba makes sense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269361740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Notwithstanding Mr. Gates ownership of TerraPower...  It makes sense for Toshiba to work with them given (a) Their ownership of the Westinghouse legacy (b) Their experience building large nuclear power reactors (c) Their experience designing small, self contained, fail-safe nuclear reactors in the 100kW to 10MW size range.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Notwithstanding Mr. Gates ownership of TerraPower... It makes sense for Toshiba to work with them given ( a ) Their ownership of the Westinghouse legacy ( b ) Their experience building large nuclear power reactors ( c ) Their experience designing small , self contained , fail-safe nuclear reactors in the 100kW to 10MW size range .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Notwithstanding Mr. Gates ownership of TerraPower...  It makes sense for Toshiba to work with them given (a) Their ownership of the Westinghouse legacy (b) Their experience building large nuclear power reactors (c) Their experience designing small, self contained, fail-safe nuclear reactors in the 100kW to 10MW size range.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584406</id>
	<title>Re:The blue screen of death...</title>
	<author>Seth Kriticos</author>
	<datestamp>1269362160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't "Blue mushroom of death" be more appropriate?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't " Blue mushroom of death " be more appropriate ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't "Blue mushroom of death" be more appropriate?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584950</id>
	<title>Re:Preemptive military strike</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269364380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't see why anyone would be surprised by this.  He's already a multi-billionaire business tycoon with his own custom-built fortress.  Since the job of Batman is already taken, the transition to supervillain is the next logical step.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see why anyone would be surprised by this .
He 's already a multi-billionaire business tycoon with his own custom-built fortress .
Since the job of Batman is already taken , the transition to supervillain is the next logical step .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see why anyone would be surprised by this.
He's already a multi-billionaire business tycoon with his own custom-built fortress.
Since the job of Batman is already taken, the transition to supervillain is the next logical step.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587746</id>
	<title>Re:negative moderation total</title>
	<author>Somegeek</author>
	<datestamp>1269374280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>on my display, the parent has a negative mod total.<br>I am surprised this is possible.</p><p>I wonder if the mod history on the comment show multiple negative mods on a zero mod comment.</p><p>It appears there are people with mod points who read zero mod stuff and do negative mods on them.</p></div><p>A/C posts start at zero.  If something is worse than just a random A/C comment, it gets lowered below zero.  No mystery.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>on my display , the parent has a negative mod total.I am surprised this is possible.I wonder if the mod history on the comment show multiple negative mods on a zero mod comment.It appears there are people with mod points who read zero mod stuff and do negative mods on them.A/C posts start at zero .
If something is worse than just a random A/C comment , it gets lowered below zero .
No mystery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>on my display, the parent has a negative mod total.I am surprised this is possible.I wonder if the mod history on the comment show multiple negative mods on a zero mod comment.It appears there are people with mod points who read zero mod stuff and do negative mods on them.A/C posts start at zero.
If something is worse than just a random A/C comment, it gets lowered below zero.
No mystery.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585750</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586206</id>
	<title>Haven't we heard this before? (2nd edit)</title>
	<author>rickb928</author>
	<datestamp>1269368760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like when Toshiba allegedly announced a safe, small 'neighborhood <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2007/12/toshibas-home-n/" title="wired.com">reactor</a> [wired.com]'?</p><p>Or was it actually true?  <a href="http://thinktech.honadvblogs.com/2009/12/15/the-new-high-tech-toshiba-micro-reactor/" title="honadvblogs.com">Hard to say</a> [honadvblogs.com]...</p><p>It's either a breakthrough, or just another story.  At least TerraPower seems to be real, even if they also want to try Thorium.</p><p>There, the second swing connects...  Missed the preview button the first time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like when Toshiba allegedly announced a safe , small 'neighborhood reactor [ wired.com ] ' ? Or was it actually true ?
Hard to say [ honadvblogs.com ] ...It 's either a breakthrough , or just another story .
At least TerraPower seems to be real , even if they also want to try Thorium.There , the second swing connects... Missed the preview button the first time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like when Toshiba allegedly announced a safe, small 'neighborhood reactor [wired.com]'?Or was it actually true?
Hard to say [honadvblogs.com]...It's either a breakthrough, or just another story.
At least TerraPower seems to be real, even if they also want to try Thorium.There, the second swing connects...  Missed the preview button the first time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31599920</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>operagost</author>
	<datestamp>1269454140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, but I can block you for being a moron who didn't read the article I linked to.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , but I can block you for being a moron who did n't read the article I linked to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, but I can block you for being a moron who didn't read the article I linked to.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584976</id>
	<title>Re:Toshiba makes sense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269364440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Their experience designing small, self contained, fail-safe nuclear reactors in the 100kW</p></div> </blockquote><p>How large is this 136 HP reactor? If it's small enough I can certainly see a great future for electric vehicles.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Their experience designing small , self contained , fail-safe nuclear reactors in the 100kW How large is this 136 HP reactor ?
If it 's small enough I can certainly see a great future for electric vehicles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their experience designing small, self contained, fail-safe nuclear reactors in the 100kW How large is this 136 HP reactor?
If it's small enough I can certainly see a great future for electric vehicles.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31593194</id>
	<title>Oblig</title>
	<author>shiftless</author>
	<datestamp>1269359280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In soviet Russia, nuke designs you</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In soviet Russia , nuke designs you</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In soviet Russia, nuke designs you</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585870</id>
	<title>He's no Tony Stark</title>
	<author>VinB</author>
	<datestamp>1269367500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Eh, let me know when he can build one in miniature - IN A CAVE!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Eh , let me know when he can build one in miniature - IN A CAVE !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eh, let me know when he can build one in miniature - IN A CAVE!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584322</id>
	<title>Dennis Miller said it best...</title>
	<author>ThePlague</author>
	<datestamp>1269361800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Bill Gates is a monocle and a Persian Cat away from being the villain in a James Bond".  Building a personal nuclear reactor certainly keeps him on track.  It would be better if he built it in a volcano with a bust of his head chiseled into the living rock, but you can't have everything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Bill Gates is a monocle and a Persian Cat away from being the villain in a James Bond " .
Building a personal nuclear reactor certainly keeps him on track .
It would be better if he built it in a volcano with a bust of his head chiseled into the living rock , but you ca n't have everything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Bill Gates is a monocle and a Persian Cat away from being the villain in a James Bond".
Building a personal nuclear reactor certainly keeps him on track.
It would be better if he built it in a volcano with a bust of his head chiseled into the living rock, but you can't have everything.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584144</id>
	<title>Re:Not what we need</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269361140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm right on it, just give me oh... say.. 20 years?</p><p>anyway, old school 1960s fission isnt all that interessting, these newer reactors which burn spent fuel from the old school reactors, is very very interesting. It reduces the amount of radioactive waste we have to store, and extracts energy in the process. Fusion, is off course the ultimate goal in nuclear technology, but optimising fission to the point where waste is kept to a minimum, and fuel cycles/reactor designs are far more efficient and safe is definitely a good thing</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm right on it , just give me oh... say.. 20 years ? anyway , old school 1960s fission isnt all that interessting , these newer reactors which burn spent fuel from the old school reactors , is very very interesting .
It reduces the amount of radioactive waste we have to store , and extracts energy in the process .
Fusion , is off course the ultimate goal in nuclear technology , but optimising fission to the point where waste is kept to a minimum , and fuel cycles/reactor designs are far more efficient and safe is definitely a good thing</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm right on it, just give me oh... say.. 20 years?anyway, old school 1960s fission isnt all that interessting, these newer reactors which burn spent fuel from the old school reactors, is very very interesting.
It reduces the amount of radioactive waste we have to store, and extracts energy in the process.
Fusion, is off course the ultimate goal in nuclear technology, but optimising fission to the point where waste is kept to a minimum, and fuel cycles/reactor designs are far more efficient and safe is definitely a good thing</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584292</id>
	<title>Gates tries to make amends, but...</title>
	<author>Angst Badger</author>
	<datestamp>1269361680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If one of Bill Gates' projects leads to clean and plentiful energy and saves the world from global warming, it still won't make up for IE6.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If one of Bill Gates ' projects leads to clean and plentiful energy and saves the world from global warming , it still wo n't make up for IE6 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If one of Bill Gates' projects leads to clean and plentiful energy and saves the world from global warming, it still won't make up for IE6.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586694</id>
	<title>Re:Obvious concern...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269370620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In a way, yes.</p><p>The CPU required to run Vista needs its own nuclear reactor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In a way , yes.The CPU required to run Vista needs its own nuclear reactor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a way, yes.The CPU required to run Vista needs its own nuclear reactor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583828</id>
	<title>scary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269359880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Just ship the reactors out now, we'll patch them on tuesday!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Just ship the reactors out now , we 'll patch them on tuesday !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Just ship the reactors out now, we'll patch them on tuesday!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585408</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1269365880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, the summary was a bit <i>unclear</i> on that one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , the summary was a bit unclear on that one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, the summary was a bit unclear on that one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583962</id>
	<title>Preparing for standoff with Axis of Evil</title>
	<author>Orga</author>
	<datestamp>1269360420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps he's hoping to get Bing into the Iranian and North Korean search engine markets by threatening them with nukes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps he 's hoping to get Bing into the Iranian and North Korean search engine markets by threatening them with nukes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps he's hoping to get Bing into the Iranian and North Korean search engine markets by threatening them with nukes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583790</id>
	<title>Oh man</title>
	<author>oldspewey</author>
	<datestamp>1269359760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just hope this thing never bluescreens</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just hope this thing never bluescreens</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just hope this thing never bluescreens</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584516</id>
	<title>Microsoft Nuclear Reactor 1.0</title>
	<author>FrozenGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1269362520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just have this horrible vision of the technicians upgrading the control system and having to reboot the system.

Homer Simpson as the celebrity sales rep?  "It's pronounced nuke-you-lar"</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just have this horrible vision of the technicians upgrading the control system and having to reboot the system .
Homer Simpson as the celebrity sales rep ?
" It 's pronounced nuke-you-lar "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just have this horrible vision of the technicians upgrading the control system and having to reboot the system.
Homer Simpson as the celebrity sales rep?
"It's pronounced nuke-you-lar"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587934</id>
	<title>Re:. . . and the obligatory:</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1269375240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"640 volts ought to be enough for anybody. . . "</p></div><p>It is, if you apply it long enough.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" 640 volts ought to be enough for anybody .
. .
" It is , if you apply it long enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"640 volts ought to be enough for anybody.
. .
"It is, if you apply it long enough.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587788</id>
	<title>Who cares?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269374460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He's only going to use it to power his interstellar starship anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's only going to use it to power his interstellar starship anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's only going to use it to power his interstellar starship anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584178</id>
	<title>Re:I Don't Know Man</title>
	<author>ciaohound</author>
	<datestamp>1269361260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, you know the Windows monopoly is finally threatened with real competition when Bill Gates begins development of a new means of holding the world ransom, for one <i>billion</i> dollars.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , you know the Windows monopoly is finally threatened with real competition when Bill Gates begins development of a new means of holding the world ransom , for one billion dollars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, you know the Windows monopoly is finally threatened with real competition when Bill Gates begins development of a new means of holding the world ransom, for one billion dollars.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31594304</id>
	<title>Where are the technical details</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269369000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So...</p><p>It'll run Windows 7?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So...It 'll run Windows 7 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So...It'll run Windows 7?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583812</id>
	<title>The blue screen of death...</title>
	<author>gzipped\_tar</author>
	<datestamp>1269359820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...finally.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...finally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...finally.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584672</id>
	<title>Re:Preparing for standoff with Axis of Evil</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1269363240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He'd have more luck keeping nukes from Iran and North Korea by threatening them with Bing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 'd have more luck keeping nukes from Iran and North Korea by threatening them with Bing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He'd have more luck keeping nukes from Iran and North Korea by threatening them with Bing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585428</id>
	<title>When it is complete his transition to...</title>
	<author>divisionbyzero</author>
	<datestamp>1269365940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Darth Montgomery Burns will be final!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Darth Montgomery Burns will be final !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Darth Montgomery Burns will be final!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585074</id>
	<title>640 Watts</title>
	<author>Powys</author>
	<datestamp>1269364800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just remember,  640 Watts is Enough For Anyone!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just remember , 640 Watts is Enough For Anyone !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just remember,  640 Watts is Enough For Anyone!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31588818</id>
	<title>Oh come on now...</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1269336420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't <i>you</i> have one if you could afford it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't you have one if you could afford it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't you have one if you could afford it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31594406</id>
	<title>Uh oh</title>
	<author>dave87656</author>
	<datestamp>1269370380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bill Gates isn't exactly known for creating reliable products. Shouldn't he kinda stay away from something like nuclear power?</p><p>Image a nuclear power station that only crashed and burned twice last month. Ouch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bill Gates is n't exactly known for creating reliable products .
Should n't he kinda stay away from something like nuclear power ? Image a nuclear power station that only crashed and burned twice last month .
Ouch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bill Gates isn't exactly known for creating reliable products.
Shouldn't he kinda stay away from something like nuclear power?Image a nuclear power station that only crashed and burned twice last month.
Ouch.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584590</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>Killjoy\_NL</author>
	<datestamp>1269362880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tony Stark is the non whiny version of Batman with a way better suit<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tony Stark is the non whiny version of Batman with a way better suit : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tony Stark is the non whiny version of Batman with a way better suit :P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31588122</id>
	<title>Re:Obvious concern...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269376080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Serious note - at the nuclear power plant I work at, I'm helping prepare a new system for installation throughout the plant that operators will use to monitor thousands of computer points (temperature, flow rates, alarms, etc) - and it is Vista-based.</p><p>Had we known that Windows 7 was going to work out as well as it has, we would have started there... Unfortunately, the nuclear industry has a hell of a turn-around time on ordering and developing major components.</p><p>P.S.: No, the system does not control any safety-related functions.  It just assists the operators in running the plant, but it isn't required by regulation or critical by any means.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Serious note - at the nuclear power plant I work at , I 'm helping prepare a new system for installation throughout the plant that operators will use to monitor thousands of computer points ( temperature , flow rates , alarms , etc ) - and it is Vista-based.Had we known that Windows 7 was going to work out as well as it has , we would have started there... Unfortunately , the nuclear industry has a hell of a turn-around time on ordering and developing major components.P.S .
: No , the system does not control any safety-related functions .
It just assists the operators in running the plant , but it is n't required by regulation or critical by any means .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Serious note - at the nuclear power plant I work at, I'm helping prepare a new system for installation throughout the plant that operators will use to monitor thousands of computer points (temperature, flow rates, alarms, etc) - and it is Vista-based.Had we known that Windows 7 was going to work out as well as it has, we would have started there... Unfortunately, the nuclear industry has a hell of a turn-around time on ordering and developing major components.P.S.
: No, the system does not control any safety-related functions.
It just assists the operators in running the plant, but it isn't required by regulation or critical by any means.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31593992</id>
	<title>Why Toshiba?</title>
	<author>mahadiga</author>
	<datestamp>1269365940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/10/21/166237&amp;tid=134&amp;tid=126&amp;tid=14" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/10/21/166237&amp;tid=134&amp;tid=126&amp;tid=14</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //science.slashdot.org/article.pl ? sid = 03/10/21/166237&amp;tid = 134&amp;tid = 126&amp;tid = 14 [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/10/21/166237&amp;tid=134&amp;tid=126&amp;tid=14 [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585750</id>
	<title>negative moderation total</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269367080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>on my display, the parent has a negative mod total.<br>I am surprised this is possible.</p><p>I wonder if the mod history on the comment show multiple negative mods on a zero mod comment.</p><p>It appears there are people with mod points who read zero mod stuff and do negative mods on them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>on my display , the parent has a negative mod total.I am surprised this is possible.I wonder if the mod history on the comment show multiple negative mods on a zero mod comment.It appears there are people with mod points who read zero mod stuff and do negative mods on them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>on my display, the parent has a negative mod total.I am surprised this is possible.I wonder if the mod history on the comment show multiple negative mods on a zero mod comment.It appears there are people with mod points who read zero mod stuff and do negative mods on them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586738</id>
	<title>Will it run Windows?</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1269370740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Take cover!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Take cover !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Take cover!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31608286</id>
	<title>Re:Oblig Windows Ref</title>
	<author>rdnetto</author>
	<datestamp>1269512760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, just in <a href="http://media.photobucket.com/image/itunes\%20eula\%20missiles/msanto/One-Offs2009/iTunesEULA.jpg" title="photobucket.com">iTunes</a> [photobucket.com]. Jobs is going to be pissed about this...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , just in iTunes [ photobucket.com ] .
Jobs is going to be pissed about this.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, just in iTunes [photobucket.com].
Jobs is going to be pissed about this...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31588838</id>
	<title>And besides. Gates. Nuclear Reactors....</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1269336480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What could go wrong?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What could go wrong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What could go wrong?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583992</id>
	<title>Not what we need</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269360540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We need "Mr. Fusion."  All this nuclear fission based energy is so last-century.  We need to get back to the future and use nuclear fusion technologies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We need " Mr .
Fusion. " All this nuclear fission based energy is so last-century .
We need to get back to the future and use nuclear fusion technologies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We need "Mr.
Fusion."  All this nuclear fission based energy is so last-century.
We need to get back to the future and use nuclear fusion technologies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584126</id>
	<title>See Ted Talks</title>
	<author>PerfectionLost</author>
	<datestamp>1269361080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bill gave a speech on this at last years tedtalks.</p><p><a href="http://www.ted.com/talks/bill\_gates.html" title="ted.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ted.com/talks/bill\_gates.html</a> [ted.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bill gave a speech on this at last years tedtalks.http : //www.ted.com/talks/bill \ _gates.html [ ted.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bill gave a speech on this at last years tedtalks.http://www.ted.com/talks/bill\_gates.html [ted.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584968</id>
	<title>Re:But, does it run Windows?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269364440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What can possibly go wrong??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What can possibly go wrong ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What can possibly go wrong?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587446</id>
	<title>Re:Gates is boring</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1269373080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Gates is doing his charity of-course, but common</i></p><p>Well, yes, charities are pretty <a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/common" title="thefreedictionary.com">common</a> [thefreedictionary.com], but come on, I suspect that you made a common spelling mistake changed the meaning of the sentence completely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gates is doing his charity of-course , but commonWell , yes , charities are pretty common [ thefreedictionary.com ] , but come on , I suspect that you made a common spelling mistake changed the meaning of the sentence completely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gates is doing his charity of-course, but commonWell, yes, charities are pretty common [thefreedictionary.com], but come on, I suspect that you made a common spelling mistake changed the meaning of the sentence completely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852</id>
	<title>Non story</title>
	<author>Nuskrad</author>
	<datestamp>1269360000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bill Gates invests in a company. He's not personally building a reactor like some kind of comic book super villain.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bill Gates invests in a company .
He 's not personally building a reactor like some kind of comic book super villain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bill Gates invests in a company.
He's not personally building a reactor like some kind of comic book super villain.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587218</id>
	<title>Reminds me of The Simpsons</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269372360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bill Gates is Mr. Burns 2.0!
<i>Excellent...</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bill Gates is Mr. Burns 2.0 !
Excellent.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bill Gates is Mr. Burns 2.0!
Excellent...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586844</id>
	<title>Re:Gates is boring</title>
	<author>TubeSteak</author>
	<datestamp>1269371100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>He is one of the few people in the world who have access to enormous resources and yet, he just does not do anything with it that I would qualify as fun.</p><p>Springer has his cars or maybe he used to, Woz flew airplanes, right? The Virgin guy, this dude Branson, he sounds like a kind of fella who knows how to have fun with the money he made. Airplanes, submarines, space craft! Now that's the kind of stuff I am talking about.</p></div><p>IIRC, Bill Gates has a 30 car collection, it's just that he doesn't really talk about his toys. His (and Paul Allen co-founder of MS) most famous car is the imported Porsche 959 which spent over a decade impounded by customs until they helped get a Federal law passed allowing for "show and display" of cars that hadn't been crash certified in the USA.</p><p>There are a lot of Bill Gates stories, they just don't get brought up when talking about his charity work.<br>Your UID is low enough that you should already know some of them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He is one of the few people in the world who have access to enormous resources and yet , he just does not do anything with it that I would qualify as fun.Springer has his cars or maybe he used to , Woz flew airplanes , right ?
The Virgin guy , this dude Branson , he sounds like a kind of fella who knows how to have fun with the money he made .
Airplanes , submarines , space craft !
Now that 's the kind of stuff I am talking about.IIRC , Bill Gates has a 30 car collection , it 's just that he does n't really talk about his toys .
His ( and Paul Allen co-founder of MS ) most famous car is the imported Porsche 959 which spent over a decade impounded by customs until they helped get a Federal law passed allowing for " show and display " of cars that had n't been crash certified in the USA.There are a lot of Bill Gates stories , they just do n't get brought up when talking about his charity work.Your UID is low enough that you should already know some of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He is one of the few people in the world who have access to enormous resources and yet, he just does not do anything with it that I would qualify as fun.Springer has his cars or maybe he used to, Woz flew airplanes, right?
The Virgin guy, this dude Branson, he sounds like a kind of fella who knows how to have fun with the money he made.
Airplanes, submarines, space craft!
Now that's the kind of stuff I am talking about.IIRC, Bill Gates has a 30 car collection, it's just that he doesn't really talk about his toys.
His (and Paul Allen co-founder of MS) most famous car is the imported Porsche 959 which spent over a decade impounded by customs until they helped get a Federal law passed allowing for "show and display" of cars that hadn't been crash certified in the USA.There are a lot of Bill Gates stories, they just don't get brought up when talking about his charity work.Your UID is low enough that you should already know some of them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585352</id>
	<title>Re:The blue screen of death...</title>
	<author>sconeu</author>
	<datestamp>1269365700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great.  Now billg will have the bomb!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great .
Now billg will have the bomb !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great.
Now billg will have the bomb!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585714</id>
	<title>Clippy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269366960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It appears you're trying to prevent a nuclear meltdown...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It appears you 're trying to prevent a nuclear meltdown.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It appears you're trying to prevent a nuclear meltdown...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586008</id>
	<title>Obligatory...</title>
	<author>vectorstream</author>
	<datestamp>1269367980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But..but..does it run Linux?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But..but..does it run Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But..but..does it run Linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584056</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>operagost</author>
	<datestamp>1269360840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>However, he has advocated <a href="http://vanshardware.com/2010/02/bill-gates-we-can-lower-the-worlds-population-with-vaccines/" title="vanshardware.com" rel="nofollow">sterilizing the population through "vaccines"</a> [vanshardware.com] like a super comic book villain.  Or maybe just a 20th-century eugenicist.</htmltext>
<tokenext>However , he has advocated sterilizing the population through " vaccines " [ vanshardware.com ] like a super comic book villain .
Or maybe just a 20th-century eugenicist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>However, he has advocated sterilizing the population through "vaccines" [vanshardware.com] like a super comic book villain.
Or maybe just a 20th-century eugenicist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585376</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>c6gunner</author>
	<datestamp>1269365760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Guys, how many times do I have to tell you<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... "-1, Troll" is NOT a replacement for "-1, Idiot".  You can't mod people down for being stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guys , how many times do I have to tell you ... " -1 , Troll " is NOT a replacement for " -1 , Idiot " .
You ca n't mod people down for being stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guys, how many times do I have to tell you ... "-1, Troll" is NOT a replacement for "-1, Idiot".
You can't mod people down for being stupid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584416</id>
	<title>nya nya</title>
	<author>uncanny</author>
	<datestamp>1269362160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Microsoft as a nuclear power,  I bet Iran is jelous</htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft as a nuclear power , I bet Iran is jelous</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft as a nuclear power,  I bet Iran is jelous</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584336</id>
	<title>Scorpio, you're mad!</title>
	<author>605dave</author>
	<datestamp>1269361860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Scorpio!<br>
He'll sting you with his dreams of power and wealth.<br>
Beware of Scorpio!<br>
His twisted twin obsessions are his plot to rule the world<br>
And his employees' health.<br>
He'll welcome you into his lair,<br>
Like the nobleman welcomes his guest.<br>
With free dental care and a stock plan that helps you invest!<br>
But beware of his generous pensions,<br>
Plus three weeks paid vacation each year,<br>
And on Fridays the lunchroom serves hot dogs and burgers and beer!<br>
He loves German beer!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Scorpio !
He 'll sting you with his dreams of power and wealth .
Beware of Scorpio !
His twisted twin obsessions are his plot to rule the world And his employees ' health .
He 'll welcome you into his lair , Like the nobleman welcomes his guest .
With free dental care and a stock plan that helps you invest !
But beware of his generous pensions , Plus three weeks paid vacation each year , And on Fridays the lunchroom serves hot dogs and burgers and beer !
He loves German beer !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scorpio!
He'll sting you with his dreams of power and wealth.
Beware of Scorpio!
His twisted twin obsessions are his plot to rule the world
And his employees' health.
He'll welcome you into his lair,
Like the nobleman welcomes his guest.
With free dental care and a stock plan that helps you invest!
But beware of his generous pensions,
Plus three weeks paid vacation each year,
And on Fridays the lunchroom serves hot dogs and burgers and beer!
He loves German beer!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31599098</id>
	<title>Just so long as...</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1269450960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the control system isn't being run by Windows, we'll all be OK...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the control system is n't being run by Windows , we 'll all be OK.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the control system isn't being run by Windows, we'll all be OK...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31597072</id>
	<title>But is it big enough</title>
	<author>Lew Perin</author>
	<datestamp>1269443220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... to power his home by the lake?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... to power his home by the lake ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... to power his home by the lake?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585066</id>
	<title>Re:Preemptive military strike</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1269364800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude, Windows ME dropped like a decade ago.  Way too late for a preemptive strike.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , Windows ME dropped like a decade ago .
Way too late for a preemptive strike .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, Windows ME dropped like a decade ago.
Way too late for a preemptive strike.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587406</id>
	<title>Re:Depleted Uranium</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269372960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DU is chemically toxic, not radiologically harmful. Using it as a fuel has nothing to do with anything. They're inducing fission through a chain reaction initiated by enriched uranium, which is not going to happen anywhere outside of a reactor.</p><p>I think it's irresponsible to be pulverising heavy metals all over the place, too, but please don't fall into the trap of thinking just because it's uranium it must harm people through radioactivity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DU is chemically toxic , not radiologically harmful .
Using it as a fuel has nothing to do with anything .
They 're inducing fission through a chain reaction initiated by enriched uranium , which is not going to happen anywhere outside of a reactor.I think it 's irresponsible to be pulverising heavy metals all over the place , too , but please do n't fall into the trap of thinking just because it 's uranium it must harm people through radioactivity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DU is chemically toxic, not radiologically harmful.
Using it as a fuel has nothing to do with anything.
They're inducing fission through a chain reaction initiated by enriched uranium, which is not going to happen anywhere outside of a reactor.I think it's irresponsible to be pulverising heavy metals all over the place, too, but please don't fall into the trap of thinking just because it's uranium it must harm people through radioactivity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587688</id>
	<title>Re:. . . and the obligatory:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269374040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I apply 640 Volts to you, I think you will find that it is enough, unless that isn't what you had in mind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I apply 640 Volts to you , I think you will find that it is enough , unless that is n't what you had in mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I apply 640 Volts to you, I think you will find that it is enough, unless that isn't what you had in mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586238</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1269368880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to slashdot's FAQ, it WAS a troll; both offtopic and inflammatory.</p><p>We now return you to slashdot's daily nuclear Gates bashing. Yay, Linux! Oh, wait...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to slashdot 's FAQ , it WAS a troll ; both offtopic and inflammatory.We now return you to slashdot 's daily nuclear Gates bashing .
Yay , Linux !
Oh , wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to slashdot's FAQ, it WAS a troll; both offtopic and inflammatory.We now return you to slashdot's daily nuclear Gates bashing.
Yay, Linux!
Oh, wait...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31588726</id>
	<title>Re:Scientific American on fusion...</title>
	<author>michael\_cain</author>
	<datestamp>1269336060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>In a fusion reactor, your energy is produced mainly in the form of neutrons (don't remember if these are slow, fast, or what)... and you get this energy out of the system... how?</p></div>
</blockquote><p>

In most proposals, let the neutrons transfer their kinetic energy to a bulk material, use that heat to boil water, and run the result through a steam turbine. Yes, it's a 75-year or longer effort to build the world's highest-tech... tea kettle.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In a fusion reactor , your energy is produced mainly in the form of neutrons ( do n't remember if these are slow , fast , or what ) ... and you get this energy out of the system... how ? In most proposals , let the neutrons transfer their kinetic energy to a bulk material , use that heat to boil water , and run the result through a steam turbine .
Yes , it 's a 75-year or longer effort to build the world 's highest-tech... tea kettle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a fusion reactor, your energy is produced mainly in the form of neutrons (don't remember if these are slow, fast, or what)... and you get this energy out of the system... how?


In most proposals, let the neutrons transfer their kinetic energy to a bulk material, use that heat to boil water, and run the result through a steam turbine.
Yes, it's a 75-year or longer effort to build the world's highest-tech... tea kettle.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31607462</id>
	<title>TED TALK</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269455760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Check out Bill Gates' TED TALK to learn more... http://www.ted.com/talks/bill\_gates.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Check out Bill Gates ' TED TALK to learn more... http : //www.ted.com/talks/bill \ _gates.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Check out Bill Gates' TED TALK to learn more... http://www.ted.com/talks/bill\_gates.html</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31590674</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>ignavus</author>
	<datestamp>1269345060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He just finds bits of old reactors in bins at Harvard...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He just finds bits of old reactors in bins at Harvard.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He just finds bits of old reactors in bins at Harvard...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583858</id>
	<title>Oblig Windows Ref</title>
	<author>Hoi Polloi</author>
	<datestamp>1269360060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And this reactor will be controled by Windows?  I'm not looking forward to a literal blue screen of death.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And this reactor will be controled by Windows ?
I 'm not looking forward to a literal blue screen of death .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And this reactor will be controled by Windows?
I'm not looking forward to a literal blue screen of death.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585358</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>517714</author>
	<datestamp>1269365700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's what he wants you to think.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what he wants you to think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what he wants you to think.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31588902</id>
	<title>Re:Nuclear; Does too little, cost too much</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1269336960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For those interested, Rocky Mountain Institute  <a href="http://neinuclearnotes.blogspot.com/2005/07/rocky-mountains-real-world-data.html" title="blogspot.com">loves to creatively play with numbers</a> [blogspot.com], just like any other organization created for the purpose of propaganda of a particular idea; so take it all with a grain of sault, and double-check the sources for both numbers and context.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For those interested , Rocky Mountain Institute loves to creatively play with numbers [ blogspot.com ] , just like any other organization created for the purpose of propaganda of a particular idea ; so take it all with a grain of sault , and double-check the sources for both numbers and context .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those interested, Rocky Mountain Institute  loves to creatively play with numbers [blogspot.com], just like any other organization created for the purpose of propaganda of a particular idea; so take it all with a grain of sault, and double-check the sources for both numbers and context.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585526</id>
	<title>Power Output?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269366300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How many gigawatts does it produce?  My DeLorean is in need of a backup just in case I jump somewhere without suitable biofuels.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How many gigawatts does it produce ?
My DeLorean is in need of a backup just in case I jump somewhere without suitable biofuels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many gigawatts does it produce?
My DeLorean is in need of a backup just in case I jump somewhere without suitable biofuels.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586358</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>astar</author>
	<datestamp>1269369480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Do not feed the trolls" and its abbreviation DNFTT redirect here. For the Wikimedia essay, see "What is a troll?".</p><p>In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response[1] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.[2]</p><p>I note that an attack on bill gates on slashdot is never off-topic.</p><p>I did not look closely, but it looks to me the cite had your quote.  the cite certainally had something real close to it and they had the video.  I did note the idea that vaccines reduces fertility rates was discussed.  out of my field, but it looked like that on one hand, women's education is well demonstrated to reduce fertility, vaccines are not so demonstrated, except maybe for one well-litigated WHO sterilization scam</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Do not feed the trolls " and its abbreviation DNFTT redirect here .
For the Wikimedia essay , see " What is a troll ?
" .In Internet slang , a troll is someone who posts inflammatory , extraneous , or off-topic messages in an online community , such as an online discussion forum , chat room or blog , with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response [ 1 ] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion .
[ 2 ] I note that an attack on bill gates on slashdot is never off-topic.I did not look closely , but it looks to me the cite had your quote .
the cite certainally had something real close to it and they had the video .
I did note the idea that vaccines reduces fertility rates was discussed .
out of my field , but it looked like that on one hand , women 's education is well demonstrated to reduce fertility , vaccines are not so demonstrated , except maybe for one well-litigated WHO sterilization scam</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Do not feed the trolls" and its abbreviation DNFTT redirect here.
For the Wikimedia essay, see "What is a troll?
".In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response[1] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.
[2]I note that an attack on bill gates on slashdot is never off-topic.I did not look closely, but it looks to me the cite had your quote.
the cite certainally had something real close to it and they had the video.
I did note the idea that vaccines reduces fertility rates was discussed.
out of my field, but it looked like that on one hand, women's education is well demonstrated to reduce fertility, vaccines are not so demonstrated, except maybe for one well-litigated WHO sterilization scam
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586424</id>
	<title>Control Room API?</title>
	<author>hAckz0r</author>
	<datestamp>1269369720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>With my luck the new '<i>Windows Control Room API 1.1</i>' will be written in C# in such a way that it will be completely incompatible with my third party <i>FusionReactor.so.6</i> that I have been happy with for so long. I bet the EU won't be happy about this either, that is unless M$ adds yet another selection to the Win9,10,11 'power control thermal isolation unit' installation menu. At least that way we can all have a 'level playing field' without going completely nuclear over this anti-standards compliance business tactic. We simply can not afford to have another ISO 'Embrace, Extend, and *Extinguish*' episode like the last one. &lt;/sarcasm&gt;</htmltext>
<tokenext>With my luck the new 'Windows Control Room API 1.1 ' will be written in C # in such a way that it will be completely incompatible with my third party FusionReactor.so.6 that I have been happy with for so long .
I bet the EU wo n't be happy about this either , that is unless M $ adds yet another selection to the Win9,10,11 'power control thermal isolation unit ' installation menu .
At least that way we can all have a 'level playing field ' without going completely nuclear over this anti-standards compliance business tactic .
We simply can not afford to have another ISO 'Embrace , Extend , and * Extinguish * ' episode like the last one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With my luck the new 'Windows Control Room API 1.1' will be written in C# in such a way that it will be completely incompatible with my third party FusionReactor.so.6 that I have been happy with for so long.
I bet the EU won't be happy about this either, that is unless M$ adds yet another selection to the Win9,10,11 'power control thermal isolation unit' installation menu.
At least that way we can all have a 'level playing field' without going completely nuclear over this anti-standards compliance business tactic.
We simply can not afford to have another ISO 'Embrace, Extend, and *Extinguish*' episode like the last one. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585770</id>
	<title>Embrace. Extend. Extinguish.</title>
	<author>mrflash818</author>
	<datestamp>1269367200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I sure hope Toshiba's personnel have read up on Bill Gate's history of "Embrace. Extend. Extinguish.".</p><p>If he runs true to his historical pattern, it means bad things down the road for these 'partners' (future victims).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I sure hope Toshiba 's personnel have read up on Bill Gate 's history of " Embrace .
Extend. Extinguish .
" .If he runs true to his historical pattern , it means bad things down the road for these 'partners ' ( future victims ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I sure hope Toshiba's personnel have read up on Bill Gate's history of "Embrace.
Extend. Extinguish.
".If he runs true to his historical pattern, it means bad things down the road for these 'partners' (future victims).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584370</id>
	<title>Sane environmentalists, rejoice!</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1269361980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I, for one, am glad to see the words "nuclear power" and "combat climate change" in the same sentence (which is not also another Slashdot comment).</p><p>Hopefully, something does come out of this in the end.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I , for one , am glad to see the words " nuclear power " and " combat climate change " in the same sentence ( which is not also another Slashdot comment ) .Hopefully , something does come out of this in the end .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, for one, am glad to see the words "nuclear power" and "combat climate change" in the same sentence (which is not also another Slashdot comment).Hopefully, something does come out of this in the end.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587984</id>
	<title>BillG with nukes?</title>
	<author>sgt\_doom</author>
	<datestamp>1269375480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now that's a fun thought.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that 's a fun thought.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that's a fun thought.....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31588166</id>
	<title>Re:Double standard</title>
	<author>phantomfive</author>
	<datestamp>1269376380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not to belabor the point, but by this time it's pretty clear from the evidence that Iran is going after nuclear weapons, not power plants.  The kind of power plant mentioned here can't be used for nuclear weapons.  I could be wrong, but I don't even think it could have a meltdown.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to belabor the point , but by this time it 's pretty clear from the evidence that Iran is going after nuclear weapons , not power plants .
The kind of power plant mentioned here ca n't be used for nuclear weapons .
I could be wrong , but I do n't even think it could have a meltdown .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to belabor the point, but by this time it's pretty clear from the evidence that Iran is going after nuclear weapons, not power plants.
The kind of power plant mentioned here can't be used for nuclear weapons.
I could be wrong, but I don't even think it could have a meltdown.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584874</id>
	<title>Start Button = Startup and Shutdown</title>
	<author>realsilly</author>
	<datestamp>1269364080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will the Start button be designed for both Startup and Shutdown of the reactor?<br>Will the paperclip show up on Computer screens stating, "I'm detecting a meltdown, would you like some help?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will the Start button be designed for both Startup and Shutdown of the reactor ? Will the paperclip show up on Computer screens stating , " I 'm detecting a meltdown , would you like some help ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will the Start button be designed for both Startup and Shutdown of the reactor?Will the paperclip show up on Computer screens stating, "I'm detecting a meltdown, would you like some help?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586252</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269368940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;Why do they always have to be villains? Tony Stark wasn't a villain.</p><p>The guy who flies to foreign countries and shoots people with sci-fi weapons? Extralegal murder of foreign nationals by a rich vigilante? Not a villain? Err, ok.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Why do they always have to be villains ?
Tony Stark was n't a villain.The guy who flies to foreign countries and shoots people with sci-fi weapons ?
Extralegal murder of foreign nationals by a rich vigilante ?
Not a villain ?
Err , ok .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;Why do they always have to be villains?
Tony Stark wasn't a villain.The guy who flies to foreign countries and shoots people with sci-fi weapons?
Extralegal murder of foreign nationals by a rich vigilante?
Not a villain?
Err, ok.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31599876</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>operagost</author>
	<datestamp>1269454020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He's saying that vaccines will LOWER THE POPULATION.  If more children live to adulthood, how does that lower the population?<blockquote><div><p> <tt>Access to birth control permits women to space out their children more, with benefits to the health of mother and child.</tt></p></div> </blockquote><p>I was referring only to the vaccines, not the birth control.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's saying that vaccines will LOWER THE POPULATION .
If more children live to adulthood , how does that lower the population ?
Access to birth control permits women to space out their children more , with benefits to the health of mother and child .
I was referring only to the vaccines , not the birth control .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's saying that vaccines will LOWER THE POPULATION.
If more children live to adulthood, how does that lower the population?
Access to birth control permits women to space out their children more, with benefits to the health of mother and child.
I was referring only to the vaccines, not the birth control.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584334</id>
	<title>. . . and the obligatory:</title>
	<author>jafac</author>
	<datestamp>1269361860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"640 volts ought to be enough for anybody. . . "</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" 640 volts ought to be enough for anybody .
. .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"640 volts ought to be enough for anybody.
. .
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584156</id>
	<title>hmm..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269361200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Was anyone else sorely disappointed to find that the PDF (Linked in the article), was only a page long?  I was hoping for this long and complicated PDF file that I could sit and read for a while<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was anyone else sorely disappointed to find that the PDF ( Linked in the article ) , was only a page long ?
I was hoping for this long and complicated PDF file that I could sit and read for a while : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was anyone else sorely disappointed to find that the PDF (Linked in the article), was only a page long?
I was hoping for this long and complicated PDF file that I could sit and read for a while :(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584748</id>
	<title>Re:Nuclear-powered Bill Gates?</title>
	<author>wavemancali</author>
	<datestamp>1269363600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bring Snoop Dog into the project loop just for the fissile my nizzile?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bring Snoop Dog into the project loop just for the fissile my nizzile ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bring Snoop Dog into the project loop just for the fissile my nizzile?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583792</id>
	<title>Yes, but does it run...</title>
	<author>kirill.s</author>
	<datestamp>1269359760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Windows?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Windows ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Windows?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585568</id>
	<title>Double standard</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1269366420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So we can trust Bill Gates with nuclear technology, but not Iran?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So we can trust Bill Gates with nuclear technology , but not Iran ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So we can trust Bill Gates with nuclear technology, but not Iran?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583988</id>
	<title>Mud Bucket Brigade</title>
	<author>psbrogna</author>
	<datestamp>1269360540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Insert MSlam/Reactor safety quip &lt;here&gt;</htmltext>
<tokenext>Insert MSlam/Reactor safety quip</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Insert MSlam/Reactor safety quip </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583884</id>
	<title>Nuclear-powered Bill Gates?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269360180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>If there was ever a more appropriate time for the Bill Gates as Borg graphic, I don't know when that would be.  If a nuclear-powered Bill Gates is ever developed, then resistance will be fissile! (sorry, resisting that joke was futile)</htmltext>
<tokenext>If there was ever a more appropriate time for the Bill Gates as Borg graphic , I do n't know when that would be .
If a nuclear-powered Bill Gates is ever developed , then resistance will be fissile !
( sorry , resisting that joke was futile )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If there was ever a more appropriate time for the Bill Gates as Borg graphic, I don't know when that would be.
If a nuclear-powered Bill Gates is ever developed, then resistance will be fissile!
(sorry, resisting that joke was futile)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586862</id>
	<title>Re:Depleted Uranium</title>
	<author>radtea</author>
	<datestamp>1269371100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Here is what happened in Fallujah:</p></div><p>I can find doctors and parents (and lawyers) who say that certain vaccine preservatives cause autism.  I can find doctors and parents (and lawyers) who say pretty much anything.</p><p>That someone says it does not make it true.</p><p>That they are comparing the rate of birth defects in Fallujah to European cities is an immediate red flag.  Iraq had a reasonably sound civil administration before it was invaded, so the records on birth defects prior to the invasion should still exist.  How about comparing to those numbers?  Or even just normalizing for the age of mothers and fathers, degree of relation between them, etc.  Iraq is a tribal society in which kin-groups are much more closely related than in the average European city--that may not be significant, but it is one of many alternative explantations that a serious study would have to look into.</p><p>I don't know what the truth is, but I do know that a couple of links to hysterical news stories is pretty much the opposite of convincing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is what happened in Fallujah : I can find doctors and parents ( and lawyers ) who say that certain vaccine preservatives cause autism .
I can find doctors and parents ( and lawyers ) who say pretty much anything.That someone says it does not make it true.That they are comparing the rate of birth defects in Fallujah to European cities is an immediate red flag .
Iraq had a reasonably sound civil administration before it was invaded , so the records on birth defects prior to the invasion should still exist .
How about comparing to those numbers ?
Or even just normalizing for the age of mothers and fathers , degree of relation between them , etc .
Iraq is a tribal society in which kin-groups are much more closely related than in the average European city--that may not be significant , but it is one of many alternative explantations that a serious study would have to look into.I do n't know what the truth is , but I do know that a couple of links to hysterical news stories is pretty much the opposite of convincing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is what happened in Fallujah:I can find doctors and parents (and lawyers) who say that certain vaccine preservatives cause autism.
I can find doctors and parents (and lawyers) who say pretty much anything.That someone says it does not make it true.That they are comparing the rate of birth defects in Fallujah to European cities is an immediate red flag.
Iraq had a reasonably sound civil administration before it was invaded, so the records on birth defects prior to the invasion should still exist.
How about comparing to those numbers?
Or even just normalizing for the age of mothers and fathers, degree of relation between them, etc.
Iraq is a tribal society in which kin-groups are much more closely related than in the average European city--that may not be significant, but it is one of many alternative explantations that a serious study would have to look into.I don't know what the truth is, but I do know that a couple of links to hysterical news stories is pretty much the opposite of convincing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31610986</id>
	<title>Re:Preemptive military strike</title>
	<author>g8oz</author>
	<datestamp>1269533460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, Red Flayer, it is you who is the hero</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , Red Flayer , it is you who is the hero</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, Red Flayer, it is you who is the hero</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31593236</id>
	<title>Let's hope...</title>
	<author>Nero Nimbus</author>
	<datestamp>1269359640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's hope he doesn't put Steve Ballmer in charge of running it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's hope he does n't put Steve Ballmer in charge of running it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's hope he doesn't put Steve Ballmer in charge of running it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31593338</id>
	<title>Re:get ready for the real RRoD</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1269360540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In my days, Sonny, it was BSOD's. The newfangled hangs don't even have hex dumps. I learned to read BSOD hexdumps while walking to school barefoot in the snow up-hill both ways, the brilliant blue screenshine glistening off the snow like a Buck Rogers raygun flashlight.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In my days , Sonny , it was BSOD 's .
The newfangled hangs do n't even have hex dumps .
I learned to read BSOD hexdumps while walking to school barefoot in the snow up-hill both ways , the brilliant blue screenshine glistening off the snow like a Buck Rogers raygun flashlight .
   </tokentext>
<sentencetext>In my days, Sonny, it was BSOD's.
The newfangled hangs don't even have hex dumps.
I learned to read BSOD hexdumps while walking to school barefoot in the snow up-hill both ways, the brilliant blue screenshine glistening off the snow like a Buck Rogers raygun flashlight.
   </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585374</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31600046</id>
	<title>Very safe</title>
	<author>minstrelmike</author>
	<datestamp>1269454500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Safety = Microsoft software in control of radioactive material.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Safety = Microsoft software in control of radioactive material .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Safety = Microsoft software in control of radioactive material.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584868</id>
	<title>Re:Preemptive military strike</title>
	<author>Red Flayer</author>
	<datestamp>1269364080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>He's building a bomb, I tell you! A bomb! Send in the troops right now to stop him.</p></div></blockquote><p>Poppycock.  One cannot defeat <i>Googol the Destroyer</i> with mere bombs.  This is an attempt by Gatus to deny Googol the Detroyer the power needed to run the antipodal LHC in order to create the bipolar quantum energy conundrum in which Googol will temper the world's data before using it to complete the Rite of a Million Targeted Ads.<br> <br> <a href="http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1555830&amp;cid=31200618" title="slashdot.org">When last we saw our heroes</a> [slashdot.org], Gatus and Joba continued in the diverse efforts to thwart Googol the Destroyer.  But we saw a new hero rising, in the persona of T-Bone Pickings, who aims to control the world's power supply via creation of wind farms under his control, thereby making fossil-fuel energy obsolete and useless to Googol the Destroyer.  It appears that Gatus and Pickings have been coordinating their efforts -- while Pickings is being thwarted by legislators who secretly serve the Dark Master, Gatus has come up with a plan to use small nuclear reactors to make fossil fuels obsolete, thereby denying Googol both the power to run the antipodal LHC and the power upon which his Webcrawling Spiders of Doom feed.  <br> <br>It appears that Googol the Destroyer has been partially thwarted in China -- there may be additional heroes there who we could celebrate, should we ever be able to get information out of the Great Firewall.  Can Gatus have the same kind of Legislative and Bureacratic success against Googol the Destroyer here in the United States?  Only time will tell.<br> <br>Meanwhile, rumors circulate that Joba, contrary to popular belief, has not been ill.  Rather, he underwent a series of surgeries to enhance his natural charisma, marketing abilities, and since he was under the knife anyway, a titanium-clad skeleton, actuator-enhanced musculature, and a bone-white monochromatic epidermis.  Cyber-Joba is now a real force to be reckoned with -- but will his new powers be enough to thwart Googol the Destroyer?<br> <br>And lest we forget, the roving Druid Stallmanx has ceased roaming for the time being, and spends his days and nights directing the efforts of his Beard Gnomes in his secret laboratory.  Just what is he cooking up?  Can he reconcile the anarchist developers with the money-grubbing and low-self-esteem developers that Gatus and Joba have converted to the cause of stopping Googol?<br> <br>All these questions possibly answered, and more, in next week's episode of <i>Googol the Destroyer</i>!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's building a bomb , I tell you !
A bomb !
Send in the troops right now to stop him.Poppycock .
One can not defeat Googol the Destroyer with mere bombs .
This is an attempt by Gatus to deny Googol the Detroyer the power needed to run the antipodal LHC in order to create the bipolar quantum energy conundrum in which Googol will temper the world 's data before using it to complete the Rite of a Million Targeted Ads .
When last we saw our heroes [ slashdot.org ] , Gatus and Joba continued in the diverse efforts to thwart Googol the Destroyer .
But we saw a new hero rising , in the persona of T-Bone Pickings , who aims to control the world 's power supply via creation of wind farms under his control , thereby making fossil-fuel energy obsolete and useless to Googol the Destroyer .
It appears that Gatus and Pickings have been coordinating their efforts -- while Pickings is being thwarted by legislators who secretly serve the Dark Master , Gatus has come up with a plan to use small nuclear reactors to make fossil fuels obsolete , thereby denying Googol both the power to run the antipodal LHC and the power upon which his Webcrawling Spiders of Doom feed .
It appears that Googol the Destroyer has been partially thwarted in China -- there may be additional heroes there who we could celebrate , should we ever be able to get information out of the Great Firewall .
Can Gatus have the same kind of Legislative and Bureacratic success against Googol the Destroyer here in the United States ?
Only time will tell .
Meanwhile , rumors circulate that Joba , contrary to popular belief , has not been ill. Rather , he underwent a series of surgeries to enhance his natural charisma , marketing abilities , and since he was under the knife anyway , a titanium-clad skeleton , actuator-enhanced musculature , and a bone-white monochromatic epidermis .
Cyber-Joba is now a real force to be reckoned with -- but will his new powers be enough to thwart Googol the Destroyer ?
And lest we forget , the roving Druid Stallmanx has ceased roaming for the time being , and spends his days and nights directing the efforts of his Beard Gnomes in his secret laboratory .
Just what is he cooking up ?
Can he reconcile the anarchist developers with the money-grubbing and low-self-esteem developers that Gatus and Joba have converted to the cause of stopping Googol ?
All these questions possibly answered , and more , in next week 's episode of Googol the Destroyer !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's building a bomb, I tell you!
A bomb!
Send in the troops right now to stop him.Poppycock.
One cannot defeat Googol the Destroyer with mere bombs.
This is an attempt by Gatus to deny Googol the Detroyer the power needed to run the antipodal LHC in order to create the bipolar quantum energy conundrum in which Googol will temper the world's data before using it to complete the Rite of a Million Targeted Ads.
When last we saw our heroes [slashdot.org], Gatus and Joba continued in the diverse efforts to thwart Googol the Destroyer.
But we saw a new hero rising, in the persona of T-Bone Pickings, who aims to control the world's power supply via creation of wind farms under his control, thereby making fossil-fuel energy obsolete and useless to Googol the Destroyer.
It appears that Gatus and Pickings have been coordinating their efforts -- while Pickings is being thwarted by legislators who secretly serve the Dark Master, Gatus has come up with a plan to use small nuclear reactors to make fossil fuels obsolete, thereby denying Googol both the power to run the antipodal LHC and the power upon which his Webcrawling Spiders of Doom feed.
It appears that Googol the Destroyer has been partially thwarted in China -- there may be additional heroes there who we could celebrate, should we ever be able to get information out of the Great Firewall.
Can Gatus have the same kind of Legislative and Bureacratic success against Googol the Destroyer here in the United States?
Only time will tell.
Meanwhile, rumors circulate that Joba, contrary to popular belief, has not been ill.  Rather, he underwent a series of surgeries to enhance his natural charisma, marketing abilities, and since he was under the knife anyway, a titanium-clad skeleton, actuator-enhanced musculature, and a bone-white monochromatic epidermis.
Cyber-Joba is now a real force to be reckoned with -- but will his new powers be enough to thwart Googol the Destroyer?
And lest we forget, the roving Druid Stallmanx has ceased roaming for the time being, and spends his days and nights directing the efforts of his Beard Gnomes in his secret laboratory.
Just what is he cooking up?
Can he reconcile the anarchist developers with the money-grubbing and low-self-esteem developers that Gatus and Joba have converted to the cause of stopping Googol?
All these questions possibly answered, and more, in next week's episode of Googol the Destroyer!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586126</id>
	<title>Haven't we heard this before?</title>
	<author>rickb928</author>
	<datestamp>1269368520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like when Toshiba allegedly announced a safe, small 'neighborhood <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2007/12/toshibas-home-n/" title="wired.com">reactor</a> [wired.com]'?</p><p>Or was it actually true?  A, a href="http://thinktech.honadvblogs.com/2009/12/15/the-new-high-tech-toshiba-micro-reactor/&gt;Hard to say...</p><p>It's either a breakthrough, or just another story.  At least TerraPower seems to be real, even if they also want to try Thorium.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like when Toshiba allegedly announced a safe , small 'neighborhood reactor [ wired.com ] ' ? Or was it actually true ?
A , a href = " http : //thinktech.honadvblogs.com/2009/12/15/the-new-high-tech-toshiba-micro-reactor/ &gt; Hard to say...It 's either a breakthrough , or just another story .
At least TerraPower seems to be real , even if they also want to try Thorium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like when Toshiba allegedly announced a safe, small 'neighborhood reactor [wired.com]'?Or was it actually true?
A, a href="http://thinktech.honadvblogs.com/2009/12/15/the-new-high-tech-toshiba-micro-reactor/&gt;Hard to say...It's either a breakthrough, or just another story.
At least TerraPower seems to be real, even if they also want to try Thorium.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583980</id>
	<title>Seems very comic book</title>
	<author>91degrees</author>
	<datestamp>1269360480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Next he'll shave his head and then try to defeat Superman.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Next he 'll shave his head and then try to defeat Superman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next he'll shave his head and then try to defeat Superman.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584160</id>
	<title>Re:The blue screen of death...</title>
	<author>sharkey</author>
	<datestamp>1269361200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://steynian.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/tsar-bomba-mushroom-cloud.jpg" title="wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">Control-Alt-Delete</a> [wordpress.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Control-Alt-Delete [ wordpress.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Control-Alt-Delete [wordpress.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586192</id>
	<title>UN weapons inspectors.</title>
	<author>xmorg</author>
	<datestamp>1269368760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm all for nuclear power but... we just need to be sure. ok?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm all for nuclear power but... we just need to be sure .
ok ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm all for nuclear power but... we just need to be sure.
ok?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584932</id>
	<title>Re:Toshiba makes sense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269364320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just as long as they don't include the bios</p><p>http://www.google.com/#hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=toshiba+bios+problems&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs\_rfai=&amp;fp=1dc62da33e2ff469</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just as long as they do n't include the bioshttp : //www.google.com/ # hl = en&amp;source = hp&amp;q = toshiba + bios + problems&amp;aq = f&amp;aqi = &amp;aql = &amp;oq = &amp;gs \ _rfai = &amp;fp = 1dc62da33e2ff469</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just as long as they don't include the bioshttp://www.google.com/#hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=toshiba+bios+problems&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs\_rfai=&amp;fp=1dc62da33e2ff469</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584208</id>
	<title>Re:Not what we need</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269361380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then maybe it needs funding instead of hand-waving.</p><p>*IF* there was concerted effort around getting fusion working, it would be around now. But as soon as it was realized that fusion would not result in another bomb or weapon platform, funding started to dry up.</p><p>As for TWR, it's better than nothing. Fission is there until we can get fusion working. Anyway, retarded policy makers are already moving to immobilize current reactor "waste" making it much more difficult if not impossible to use in these cleaner types of breeder reactors. Good luck to Gates' new initiative. I wish him luck.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then maybe it needs funding instead of hand-waving .
* IF * there was concerted effort around getting fusion working , it would be around now .
But as soon as it was realized that fusion would not result in another bomb or weapon platform , funding started to dry up.As for TWR , it 's better than nothing .
Fission is there until we can get fusion working .
Anyway , retarded policy makers are already moving to immobilize current reactor " waste " making it much more difficult if not impossible to use in these cleaner types of breeder reactors .
Good luck to Gates ' new initiative .
I wish him luck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then maybe it needs funding instead of hand-waving.
*IF* there was concerted effort around getting fusion working, it would be around now.
But as soon as it was realized that fusion would not result in another bomb or weapon platform, funding started to dry up.As for TWR, it's better than nothing.
Fission is there until we can get fusion working.
Anyway, retarded policy makers are already moving to immobilize current reactor "waste" making it much more difficult if not impossible to use in these cleaner types of breeder reactors.
Good luck to Gates' new initiative.
I wish him luck.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584558</id>
	<title>New Name</title>
	<author>Cytlid</author>
	<datestamp>1269362760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do we have to start calling him Mr Burns, and will he have an assistant named Smithers?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do we have to start calling him Mr Burns , and will he have an assistant named Smithers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do we have to start calling him Mr Burns, and will he have an assistant named Smithers?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585218</id>
	<title>I thought...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269365220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... that I had read YEARS ago about the South Africans having worked on and/or perfected what IIRC was called a pebble bed reactor which was also small and intended to not need refueling with casing design for easy storage after ending functional life...</p><p>and yes, there it is near the bottom of the article...<br>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble\_bed\_reactor<br>the Adam's Atomic Engine variant...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... that I had read YEARS ago about the South Africans having worked on and/or perfected what IIRC was called a pebble bed reactor which was also small and intended to not need refueling with casing design for easy storage after ending functional life...and yes , there it is near the bottom of the article...http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble \ _bed \ _reactorthe Adam 's Atomic Engine variant.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... that I had read YEARS ago about the South Africans having worked on and/or perfected what IIRC was called a pebble bed reactor which was also small and intended to not need refueling with casing design for easy storage after ending functional life...and yes, there it is near the bottom of the article...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble\_bed\_reactorthe Adam's Atomic Engine variant...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584262</id>
	<title>Uncle!</title>
	<author>Comatose51</author>
	<datestamp>1269361560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Alright, alright!  I'll say "uncle!".  You win uncle Bill.  I'll go back to using IE.  No need to go nuclear on us.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Alright , alright !
I 'll say " uncle ! " .
You win uncle Bill .
I 'll go back to using IE .
No need to go nuclear on us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Alright, alright!
I'll say "uncle!".
You win uncle Bill.
I'll go back to using IE.
No need to go nuclear on us.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585686</id>
	<title>Sun makes Windows disclaim nuclear ...</title>
	<author>perpenso</author>
	<datestamp>1269366840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>isnt there some clause in the windows EULA that specificly prohibites using it in nuclear installation?</p><p>and damn, the MS-shills are out in force today, not a single post with a BSOD joke above the -1 level...</p></div><p>Note on Java Support.  The OS Components may contain support for programs
written in Java.  Java technology is not fault tolerant and is not designed,
manufactured, or intended for use or resale as on-line control equipment in
hazardous environments requiring fail-safe performance, such as in the
operation of nuclear facilities, aircraft navigation or communication systems,
air traffic control, direct life support machines, or weapons systems, in
which the failure of Java technology could lead directly to death, personal
injury, or severe physical or environmental damage. Sun Microsystems, Inc. has
contractually obligated Microsoft to make this disclaimer.<br> <br>

<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msdownload/ieplatform/ie/license.txt" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/msdownload/ieplatform/ie/license.txt</a> [microsoft.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>isnt there some clause in the windows EULA that specificly prohibites using it in nuclear installation ? and damn , the MS-shills are out in force today , not a single post with a BSOD joke above the -1 level...Note on Java Support .
The OS Components may contain support for programs written in Java .
Java technology is not fault tolerant and is not designed , manufactured , or intended for use or resale as on-line control equipment in hazardous environments requiring fail-safe performance , such as in the operation of nuclear facilities , aircraft navigation or communication systems , air traffic control , direct life support machines , or weapons systems , in which the failure of Java technology could lead directly to death , personal injury , or severe physical or environmental damage .
Sun Microsystems , Inc. has contractually obligated Microsoft to make this disclaimer .
http : //www.microsoft.com/msdownload/ieplatform/ie/license.txt [ microsoft.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>isnt there some clause in the windows EULA that specificly prohibites using it in nuclear installation?and damn, the MS-shills are out in force today, not a single post with a BSOD joke above the -1 level...Note on Java Support.
The OS Components may contain support for programs
written in Java.
Java technology is not fault tolerant and is not designed,
manufactured, or intended for use or resale as on-line control equipment in
hazardous environments requiring fail-safe performance, such as in the
operation of nuclear facilities, aircraft navigation or communication systems,
air traffic control, direct life support machines, or weapons systems, in
which the failure of Java technology could lead directly to death, personal
injury, or severe physical or environmental damage.
Sun Microsystems, Inc. has
contractually obligated Microsoft to make this disclaimer.
http://www.microsoft.com/msdownload/ieplatform/ie/license.txt [microsoft.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587722</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269374160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You must be unfamiliar with Trolls who go around posting things as if they are bleeding morons just to incite people into responding.  A down-mod on something so blatantly stupid is well-deserved, if only to hide it from the view of the general public.  (Having said that, I don't think I've ever down-modded anyone)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You must be unfamiliar with Trolls who go around posting things as if they are bleeding morons just to incite people into responding .
A down-mod on something so blatantly stupid is well-deserved , if only to hide it from the view of the general public .
( Having said that , I do n't think I 've ever down-modded anyone )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must be unfamiliar with Trolls who go around posting things as if they are bleeding morons just to incite people into responding.
A down-mod on something so blatantly stupid is well-deserved, if only to hide it from the view of the general public.
(Having said that, I don't think I've ever down-modded anyone)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584228</id>
	<title>I hope it does not run Windows...</title>
	<author>sageres</author>
	<datestamp>1269361440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Having survived Chernobyl it gives me a great fear if such reactor runs Windows. We will all be glowing in a dark after that blue screen....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Having survived Chernobyl it gives me a great fear if such reactor runs Windows .
We will all be glowing in a dark after that blue screen... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having survived Chernobyl it gives me a great fear if such reactor runs Windows.
We will all be glowing in a dark after that blue screen....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587812</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1269374580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Welcome to democracy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Welcome to democracy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Welcome to democracy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584794</id>
	<title>Re:Oh man</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1269363720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I just hope this thing never bluescreens</p></div><p>Why? Does the article say he's going to put Windows ME on it?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just hope this thing never bluescreensWhy ?
Does the article say he 's going to put Windows ME on it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just hope this thing never bluescreensWhy?
Does the article say he's going to put Windows ME on it?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584090</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>eclectro</author>
	<datestamp>1269360960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>He's not personally building a reactor like some kind of comic book super villain.</p></div><p>No. That's what the underlings are for. Steve Balmer goes nuclear quite often.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's not personally building a reactor like some kind of comic book super villain.No .
That 's what the underlings are for .
Steve Balmer goes nuclear quite often .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's not personally building a reactor like some kind of comic book super villain.No.
That's what the underlings are for.
Steve Balmer goes nuclear quite often.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584314</id>
	<title>Emerging Market Countries</title>
	<author>Sponge Bath</author>
	<datestamp>1269361740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Selling many small nuclear reactors and fuel to "emerging market countries"? Hopefully there is some review process for who can buy these and a tracking process to guarantee the materials stay with the original purchasers. Is Yemen an "emerging market country"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Selling many small nuclear reactors and fuel to " emerging market countries " ?
Hopefully there is some review process for who can buy these and a tracking process to guarantee the materials stay with the original purchasers .
Is Yemen an " emerging market country " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Selling many small nuclear reactors and fuel to "emerging market countries"?
Hopefully there is some review process for who can buy these and a tracking process to guarantee the materials stay with the original purchasers.
Is Yemen an "emerging market country"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583944</id>
	<title>Lesson</title>
	<author>DoofusOfDeath</author>
	<datestamp>1269360360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pride goeth before the meltdown.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pride goeth before the meltdown .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pride goeth before the meltdown.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586912</id>
	<title>Is it Vaporware already?</title>
	<author>davonshire</author>
	<datestamp>1269371280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't help but notice all the comments about Gates and the cuts over shadowed the main focus of the article being this Traveling Wave Reactor.</p><p>A run over to Wikipedia gave me some reason to doubt this amazing power system. Mostly being that it was theorized in 1958, but to date unlike many other reactor types, no one has built a prototype even.</p><p>So the question then comes, does anyone know of newer information or why a prototype hasn't been built for testing? It may not put out as much power as a LWR, but it seems it would have exceptional commercial value considering the kind of fuel it uses.</p><p>Just curious.</p><p>D.S.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't help but notice all the comments about Gates and the cuts over shadowed the main focus of the article being this Traveling Wave Reactor.A run over to Wikipedia gave me some reason to doubt this amazing power system .
Mostly being that it was theorized in 1958 , but to date unlike many other reactor types , no one has built a prototype even.So the question then comes , does anyone know of newer information or why a prototype has n't been built for testing ?
It may not put out as much power as a LWR , but it seems it would have exceptional commercial value considering the kind of fuel it uses.Just curious.D.S .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't help but notice all the comments about Gates and the cuts over shadowed the main focus of the article being this Traveling Wave Reactor.A run over to Wikipedia gave me some reason to doubt this amazing power system.
Mostly being that it was theorized in 1958, but to date unlike many other reactor types, no one has built a prototype even.So the question then comes, does anyone know of newer information or why a prototype hasn't been built for testing?
It may not put out as much power as a LWR, but it seems it would have exceptional commercial value considering the kind of fuel it uses.Just curious.D.S.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31590384</id>
	<title>joke?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269343980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ahead in schedule april fools joke?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ahead in schedule april fools joke ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ahead in schedule april fools joke?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587600</id>
	<title>How does this work?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269373740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does anyone actually understand the PDF? It sounds too much like a perpetual motion scam to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone actually understand the PDF ?
It sounds too much like a perpetual motion scam to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone actually understand the PDF?
It sounds too much like a perpetual motion scam to me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585612</id>
	<title>Gates is boring</title>
	<author>roman\_mir</author>
	<datestamp>1269366540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know, there was something about Gates that always struck me as boring.</p><p>He is one of the few people in the world who have access to enormous resources and yet, he just does not do anything with it that I would qualify as fun.</p><p>Springer has his cars or maybe he used to, Woz flew airplanes, right?  The Virgin guy, this dude Branson, he sounds like a kind of fella who knows how to have fun with the money he made.  Airplanes, submarines, space craft!  Now that's the kind of stuff I am talking about.</p><p>Gates is doing his charity of-course, but common, give a man a fish and feed him for a day, teach him how to fish and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... there goes your fishing monopoly.  What I mean is, he should be doing something fun with his money before he crocks.  What's the point of having all that dough and do nothing exciting with it?  Well, maybe he is excited with the charity works, again, I don't know.  If I had crazy money, I would definitely build the biggest robots or biggest guns ever or biggest freaking submarine or a Enterprise at Moon's orbit.  Something that would be hard and fun to do.</p><p>Common, Gates, do something that would show us that money can really cause great amounts of fun.  Build a freaking nuclear reactor and attach it to a shark's head or something!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know , there was something about Gates that always struck me as boring.He is one of the few people in the world who have access to enormous resources and yet , he just does not do anything with it that I would qualify as fun.Springer has his cars or maybe he used to , Woz flew airplanes , right ?
The Virgin guy , this dude Branson , he sounds like a kind of fella who knows how to have fun with the money he made .
Airplanes , submarines , space craft !
Now that 's the kind of stuff I am talking about.Gates is doing his charity of-course , but common , give a man a fish and feed him for a day , teach him how to fish and .... there goes your fishing monopoly .
What I mean is , he should be doing something fun with his money before he crocks .
What 's the point of having all that dough and do nothing exciting with it ?
Well , maybe he is excited with the charity works , again , I do n't know .
If I had crazy money , I would definitely build the biggest robots or biggest guns ever or biggest freaking submarine or a Enterprise at Moon 's orbit .
Something that would be hard and fun to do.Common , Gates , do something that would show us that money can really cause great amounts of fun .
Build a freaking nuclear reactor and attach it to a shark 's head or something !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know, there was something about Gates that always struck me as boring.He is one of the few people in the world who have access to enormous resources and yet, he just does not do anything with it that I would qualify as fun.Springer has his cars or maybe he used to, Woz flew airplanes, right?
The Virgin guy, this dude Branson, he sounds like a kind of fella who knows how to have fun with the money he made.
Airplanes, submarines, space craft!
Now that's the kind of stuff I am talking about.Gates is doing his charity of-course, but common, give a man a fish and feed him for a day, teach him how to fish and .... there goes your fishing monopoly.
What I mean is, he should be doing something fun with his money before he crocks.
What's the point of having all that dough and do nothing exciting with it?
Well, maybe he is excited with the charity works, again, I don't know.
If I had crazy money, I would definitely build the biggest robots or biggest guns ever or biggest freaking submarine or a Enterprise at Moon's orbit.
Something that would be hard and fun to do.Common, Gates, do something that would show us that money can really cause great amounts of fun.
Build a freaking nuclear reactor and attach it to a shark's head or something!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584428</id>
	<title>Re:Obvious concern...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269362220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will it run Linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it run Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it run Linux?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587980</id>
	<title>Re:Depleted Uranium</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269375420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're compounding some already bad information with the bad slashdot summary.</p><p>DU is toxic in that it's a heavy metal, but it's not radioactive. (Half life of 4+ billion years. The air you're breathing right now is a lot more radioactive.)</p><p>This reactor doesn't "run on DU" as presented. It uses normal enriched uranium fission right next to the DU to create... plutonium. Enriched uranium fission and plutonium fission are what the reactor actually uses to generate electricity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're compounding some already bad information with the bad slashdot summary.DU is toxic in that it 's a heavy metal , but it 's not radioactive .
( Half life of 4 + billion years .
The air you 're breathing right now is a lot more radioactive .
) This reactor does n't " run on DU " as presented .
It uses normal enriched uranium fission right next to the DU to create... plutonium. Enriched uranium fission and plutonium fission are what the reactor actually uses to generate electricity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're compounding some already bad information with the bad slashdot summary.DU is toxic in that it's a heavy metal, but it's not radioactive.
(Half life of 4+ billion years.
The air you're breathing right now is a lot more radioactive.
)This reactor doesn't "run on DU" as presented.
It uses normal enriched uranium fission right next to the DU to create... plutonium. Enriched uranium fission and plutonium fission are what the reactor actually uses to generate electricity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585068</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>CODiNE</author>
	<datestamp>1269364800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That and "640KW ought to be enough for anybody."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That and " 640KW ought to be enough for anybody .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That and "640KW ought to be enough for anybody.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587568</id>
	<title>Definition of "could run for decades"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269373560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In ad-speak, this means "might run for up to 20 years... or it might not."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In ad-speak , this means " might run for up to 20 years... or it might not .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In ad-speak, this means "might run for up to 20 years... or it might not.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587040</id>
	<title>Re:Oh man</title>
	<author>Perp Atuitie</author>
	<datestamp>1269371700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I sure gives "Blue Screen of Death" a whole new dimension.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I sure gives " Blue Screen of Death " a whole new dimension .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I sure gives "Blue Screen of Death" a whole new dimension.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584320</id>
	<title>While Iran Is Touted By Billary Clinton</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269361800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>as a world threat! LOL</p><p>Dear Hillary: Please return to your sandbox with<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b49Iwfp8U-U" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Kim Jong iL</a> [youtube.com].</p><p>Yours In Astrakhan,<br>Kilgore Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>as a world threat !
LOLDear Hillary : Please return to your sandbox withKim Jong iL [ youtube.com ] .Yours In Astrakhan,Kilgore Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as a world threat!
LOLDear Hillary: Please return to your sandbox withKim Jong iL [youtube.com].Yours In Astrakhan,Kilgore Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587634</id>
	<title>What about Thorium reactors?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269373860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about Thorium reactors? Why does no one ever discuss Thorium reactors as solutions to nuclear energy?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about Thorium reactors ?
Why does no one ever discuss Thorium reactors as solutions to nuclear energy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about Thorium reactors?
Why does no one ever discuss Thorium reactors as solutions to nuclear energy?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584234</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>drachenfyre</author>
	<datestamp>1269361500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do they always have to be villains?  Tony Stark wasn't a villain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do they always have to be villains ?
Tony Stark was n't a villain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do they always have to be villains?
Tony Stark wasn't a villain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31592740</id>
	<title>Re:Gates is boring</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1269355920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The Virgin guy, this dude Branson, he sounds like a kind of fella who knows how to have fun with the money he made. Airplanes, submarines, space craft! Now that's the kind of stuff I am talking about.</p></div><p>That&rsquo;s what you call fun?</p><p><a href="http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=branson\%20nude\%20model&amp;gbv=2&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=" title="google.com">THAT&rsquo;s what I call FUN!</a> [google.com].<br>Of course you can still let a airplane drag yourself, and have some bodyguards in a submarine. But it&rsquo;s all secondary. ^^</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Virgin guy , this dude Branson , he sounds like a kind of fella who knows how to have fun with the money he made .
Airplanes , submarines , space craft !
Now that 's the kind of stuff I am talking about.That    s what you call fun ? THAT    s what I call FUN !
[ google.com ] .Of course you can still let a airplane drag yourself , and have some bodyguards in a submarine .
But it    s all secondary .
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Virgin guy, this dude Branson, he sounds like a kind of fella who knows how to have fun with the money he made.
Airplanes, submarines, space craft!
Now that's the kind of stuff I am talking about.That’s what you call fun?THAT’s what I call FUN!
[google.com].Of course you can still let a airplane drag yourself, and have some bodyguards in a submarine.
But it’s all secondary.
^^
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585154</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269365040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Bill Gates invests in a company. He's not personally building a reactor like some kind of comic book super villain.</p></div><p>I know right.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bill Gates invests in a company .
He 's not personally building a reactor like some kind of comic book super villain.I know right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bill Gates invests in a company.
He's not personally building a reactor like some kind of comic book super villain.I know right.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583800</id>
	<title>Preemptive military strike</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1269359820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He's building a bomb, I tell you! A bomb! Send in the troops right now to stop him.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's building a bomb , I tell you !
A bomb !
Send in the troops right now to stop him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's building a bomb, I tell you!
A bomb!
Send in the troops right now to stop him.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584330</id>
	<title>Anti-Trust</title>
	<author>Kaldesh</author>
	<datestamp>1269361800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Blue Screen of Death will now cause the green cloud of radioactive fallout!

Gate's is simply looking to create a rainbow of diversity for the ways that he can cause pain and destruction. Though... I'm not sure leaping from electronic to biological desolation? Might their be some anti-trust issues here (again)? Billy when oh when will you learn?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Blue Screen of Death will now cause the green cloud of radioactive fallout !
Gate 's is simply looking to create a rainbow of diversity for the ways that he can cause pain and destruction .
Though... I 'm not sure leaping from electronic to biological desolation ?
Might their be some anti-trust issues here ( again ) ?
Billy when oh when will you learn ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Blue Screen of Death will now cause the green cloud of radioactive fallout!
Gate's is simply looking to create a rainbow of diversity for the ways that he can cause pain and destruction.
Though... I'm not sure leaping from electronic to biological desolation?
Might their be some anti-trust issues here (again)?
Billy when oh when will you learn?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584660</id>
	<title>Live Demonstration coming soon</title>
	<author>Blaskowicz</author>
	<datestamp>1269363180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's plugged in!<br>
It's gonna say, hey I think I got a new device.<br>
It's gonna load the appropriate driver.<br>
You now expect this nuke react.. Wooww!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's plugged in !
It 's gon na say , hey I think I got a new device .
It 's gon na load the appropriate driver .
You now expect this nuke react. .
Wooww ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's plugged in!
It's gonna say, hey I think I got a new device.
It's gonna load the appropriate driver.
You now expect this nuke react..
Wooww!!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583974</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269360480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... or <em>is he</em>?</p><p>Tune in next week for the continuation of this exciting episode!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... or is he ? Tune in next week for the continuation of this exciting episode !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... or is he?Tune in next week for the continuation of this exciting episode!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585406</id>
	<title>Depleted Uranium</title>
	<author>g8oz</author>
	<datestamp>1269365880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The fact that you can run this reactor from depleted uranium should give pause to those who think it's okay for the U.S military to be using DU weapons in combat.</p><p>Harmful aftereffects of DU do exist contrary to what the Pentagon says. It poisons the land and poisons the people. It's a slow burning WMD and it's use should be declared the war crime that it is.</p><p>Here is what happened in Fallujah:<br><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle\_east/8549745.stm" title="bbc.co.uk" rel="nofollow">Birth defects rise reported by Fallujah doctors</a> [bbc.co.uk]<br><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503543\_162-6266684-503543.html" title="cbsnews.com" rel="nofollow">Docs Blame U.S. Weapons for Fallujah Birth Defects</a> [cbsnews.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The fact that you can run this reactor from depleted uranium should give pause to those who think it 's okay for the U.S military to be using DU weapons in combat.Harmful aftereffects of DU do exist contrary to what the Pentagon says .
It poisons the land and poisons the people .
It 's a slow burning WMD and it 's use should be declared the war crime that it is.Here is what happened in Fallujah : Birth defects rise reported by Fallujah doctors [ bbc.co.uk ] Docs Blame U.S. Weapons for Fallujah Birth Defects [ cbsnews.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fact that you can run this reactor from depleted uranium should give pause to those who think it's okay for the U.S military to be using DU weapons in combat.Harmful aftereffects of DU do exist contrary to what the Pentagon says.
It poisons the land and poisons the people.
It's a slow burning WMD and it's use should be declared the war crime that it is.Here is what happened in Fallujah:Birth defects rise reported by Fallujah doctors [bbc.co.uk]Docs Blame U.S. Weapons for Fallujah Birth Defects [cbsnews.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584514</id>
	<title>Re:Preemptive military strike</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269362520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sure that's not true. And the fact that he's about to announce his research projects into large aquatic carnivores and "laser" technology from within the Gates Foundation Secret Volcano HQ... I mean head office is also mere coincidence.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure that 's not true .
And the fact that he 's about to announce his research projects into large aquatic carnivores and " laser " technology from within the Gates Foundation Secret Volcano HQ... I mean head office is also mere coincidence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure that's not true.
And the fact that he's about to announce his research projects into large aquatic carnivores and "laser" technology from within the Gates Foundation Secret Volcano HQ... I mean head office is also mere coincidence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587338</id>
	<title>Cuba crisis</title>
	<author>Hymer</author>
	<datestamp>1269372660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I belive that the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 was warm, fluffy and safe compared to the possibility of Bill Gates making a nuclear reactor.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I belive that the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 was warm , fluffy and safe compared to the possibility of Bill Gates making a nuclear reactor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I belive that the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 was warm, fluffy and safe compared to the possibility of Bill Gates making a nuclear reactor.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587866</id>
	<title>Re:I Don't Know Man</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269374880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean evil \_schemas\_<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean evil \ _schemas \ _ : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean evil \_schemas\_ :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584754</id>
	<title>The sick part on this ....</title>
	<author>WindBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1269363600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>is that nearly all of the core tech that is used in plants today was developed in America. Likewise, even this one was mostly developed here back in the 60's.  Terrapower is simply an update of an old oak ridge idea. Yet, this work will go Toshiba, rather than General Atomics, B&amp;W, or other American companies.

Gates, have GA develop it. Or B&amp;W who has been developing reactors since the 60's (they do all of the reactors for the Navy).</htmltext>
<tokenext>is that nearly all of the core tech that is used in plants today was developed in America .
Likewise , even this one was mostly developed here back in the 60 's .
Terrapower is simply an update of an old oak ridge idea .
Yet , this work will go Toshiba , rather than General Atomics , B&amp;W , or other American companies .
Gates , have GA develop it .
Or B&amp;W who has been developing reactors since the 60 's ( they do all of the reactors for the Navy ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is that nearly all of the core tech that is used in plants today was developed in America.
Likewise, even this one was mostly developed here back in the 60's.
Terrapower is simply an update of an old oak ridge idea.
Yet, this work will go Toshiba, rather than General Atomics, B&amp;W, or other American companies.
Gates, have GA develop it.
Or B&amp;W who has been developing reactors since the 60's (they do all of the reactors for the Navy).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584072</id>
	<title>Re:Oblig Windows Ref</title>
	<author>Vectormatic</author>
	<datestamp>1269360900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>isnt there some clause in the windows EULA that specificly prohibites using it in nuclear installation?</p><p>and damn, the MS-shills are out in force today, not a single post with a BSOD joke above the -1 level...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>isnt there some clause in the windows EULA that specificly prohibites using it in nuclear installation ? and damn , the MS-shills are out in force today , not a single post with a BSOD joke above the -1 level.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>isnt there some clause in the windows EULA that specificly prohibites using it in nuclear installation?and damn, the MS-shills are out in force today, not a single post with a BSOD joke above the -1 level...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586474</id>
	<title>Nuclear; Does too little, cost too much</title>
	<author>alex\_guy\_CA</author>
	<datestamp>1269369900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The issues of renewable energy and energy independence have taken center stage in both media and political conversations lately, but the means of achieving various energy goals have proven to be rather controversial. Proposed options dominating news headlines include clean coal, nuclear energy, and offshore drilling. Is there an energy path that we can all agree upon?<p>The answer is yes, and  <a href="http://nc.rmi.org//page.redir?target=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.rmi.org&amp;srcid=12187&amp;srctid=1&amp;erid=195080" title="rmi.org">Rocky Mountain Institute</a> [rmi.org] and Chief Scientist <a href="http://nc.rmi.org//page.redir?target=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.rmi.org\%2Fsitepages\%2Fpid56.php&amp;srcid=12187&amp;srctid=1&amp;erid=195080" title="rmi.org">Amory Lovins</a> [rmi.org] were featured in a <a href="http://nc.rmi.org//page.redir?target=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.rmi.org\%2Fsitepages\%2Fpid51.php&amp;srcid=12187&amp;srctid=1&amp;erid=195080" title="rmi.org">New York Times</a> [rmi.org] blog in response to last years Presidential Debate. Energy efficiency, a solution at the core of <a href="http://nc.rmi.org//page.redir?target=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.rmi.org&amp;srcid=12187&amp;srctid=1&amp;erid=195080" title="rmi.org">RMIs</a> [rmi.org] work, was discussed as a viable and economically profitable resolution to both energy and economy issues. New York Times writer Kate Galbraith points out that <a href="http://nc.rmi.org//page.redir?target=http\%3A\%2F\%2Frmi.org&amp;srcid=12187&amp;srctid=1&amp;erid=195080" title="rmi.org">RMI</a> [rmi.org] and <a href="http://nc.rmi.org//page.redir?target=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fhttp\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.rmi.org\%2Fsitepages\%2Fpid56.php&amp;srcid=12187&amp;srctid=1&amp;erid=195080" title="rmi.org">Amory Lovins</a> [rmi.org] have consistently advocated the benefits of a soft-path approach to energy, with efficiency at its core. You can read the article <a href="http://nc.rmi.org//page.redir?target=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.rmi.org\%2Fsitepages\%2Fpid51.php&amp;srcid=12187&amp;srctid=1&amp;erid=195080" title="rmi.org">here</a> [rmi.org].</p><p>When it comes to nuclear power specifically, every dollar invested in new US nuclear electricity will save approximately 2-11 times less carbon, and will do so roughly 20-40 times slower, than investing in the same dollar in energy efficiency and micropower (cogeneration plus renewables minus big hydro dams). Buying new nuclear capacity instead of efficiency causes more carbon to be released than spending the same money on new coal plants!</p><p>These conclusions and the empirical evidence supporting them are summarized in <a href="http://nc.rmi.org//page.redir?target=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.rmi.org\%2Fsitepages\%2Fpid467.php&amp;srcid=12187&amp;srctid=1&amp;erid=195080" title="rmi.org">Forget Nuclear</a> [rmi.org], and fully documented in <a href="http://nc.rmi.org//page.redir?target=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.rmi.org\%2Fsitepages\%2Fpid257.php&amp;srcid=12187&amp;srctid=1&amp;erid=195080" title="rmi.org">The Nuclear Illusion</a> [rmi.org], available for download <a href="http://nc.rmi.org//page.redir?target=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.rmi.org\%2Fimages\%2FPDFs\%2FEnergy\%2FE08-01\_AmbioNucIllusion.pdf&amp;srcid=12187&amp;srctid=1&amp;erid=195080" title="rmi.org">here</a> [rmi.org], which is to be published in early 2009 by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences journal Ambio.</p><p>Hopefully our vision will help put these widely publicized issues into perspective and move us all toward a better understanding that takes us beyond politically divisive issues to collective and viable solutions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The issues of renewable energy and energy independence have taken center stage in both media and political conversations lately , but the means of achieving various energy goals have proven to be rather controversial .
Proposed options dominating news headlines include clean coal , nuclear energy , and offshore drilling .
Is there an energy path that we can all agree upon ? The answer is yes , and Rocky Mountain Institute [ rmi.org ] and Chief Scientist Amory Lovins [ rmi.org ] were featured in a New York Times [ rmi.org ] blog in response to last years Presidential Debate .
Energy efficiency , a solution at the core of RMIs [ rmi.org ] work , was discussed as a viable and economically profitable resolution to both energy and economy issues .
New York Times writer Kate Galbraith points out that RMI [ rmi.org ] and Amory Lovins [ rmi.org ] have consistently advocated the benefits of a soft-path approach to energy , with efficiency at its core .
You can read the article here [ rmi.org ] .When it comes to nuclear power specifically , every dollar invested in new US nuclear electricity will save approximately 2-11 times less carbon , and will do so roughly 20-40 times slower , than investing in the same dollar in energy efficiency and micropower ( cogeneration plus renewables minus big hydro dams ) .
Buying new nuclear capacity instead of efficiency causes more carbon to be released than spending the same money on new coal plants ! These conclusions and the empirical evidence supporting them are summarized in Forget Nuclear [ rmi.org ] , and fully documented in The Nuclear Illusion [ rmi.org ] , available for download here [ rmi.org ] , which is to be published in early 2009 by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences journal Ambio.Hopefully our vision will help put these widely publicized issues into perspective and move us all toward a better understanding that takes us beyond politically divisive issues to collective and viable solutions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The issues of renewable energy and energy independence have taken center stage in both media and political conversations lately, but the means of achieving various energy goals have proven to be rather controversial.
Proposed options dominating news headlines include clean coal, nuclear energy, and offshore drilling.
Is there an energy path that we can all agree upon?The answer is yes, and  Rocky Mountain Institute [rmi.org] and Chief Scientist Amory Lovins [rmi.org] were featured in a New York Times [rmi.org] blog in response to last years Presidential Debate.
Energy efficiency, a solution at the core of RMIs [rmi.org] work, was discussed as a viable and economically profitable resolution to both energy and economy issues.
New York Times writer Kate Galbraith points out that RMI [rmi.org] and Amory Lovins [rmi.org] have consistently advocated the benefits of a soft-path approach to energy, with efficiency at its core.
You can read the article here [rmi.org].When it comes to nuclear power specifically, every dollar invested in new US nuclear electricity will save approximately 2-11 times less carbon, and will do so roughly 20-40 times slower, than investing in the same dollar in energy efficiency and micropower (cogeneration plus renewables minus big hydro dams).
Buying new nuclear capacity instead of efficiency causes more carbon to be released than spending the same money on new coal plants!These conclusions and the empirical evidence supporting them are summarized in Forget Nuclear [rmi.org], and fully documented in The Nuclear Illusion [rmi.org], available for download here [rmi.org], which is to be published in early 2009 by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences journal Ambio.Hopefully our vision will help put these widely publicized issues into perspective and move us all toward a better understanding that takes us beyond politically divisive issues to collective and viable solutions.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586460</id>
	<title>Bias</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269369840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdot is incredibly harsh when it comes to Bill Gates, but he has probably done more to improve the world than all of us combined.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot is incredibly harsh when it comes to Bill Gates , but he has probably done more to improve the world than all of us combined .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot is incredibly harsh when it comes to Bill Gates, but he has probably done more to improve the world than all of us combined.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587232</id>
	<title>Re:Toshiba makes sense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269372360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I work for Toshiba in the power systems group.

Most people don't realize that Toshiba has been working on power equipment for a long time.  We have certain blueprints from the 1930's that are still being used today (mostly small nuts/bolts, washers, etc).  We lead the US in new construction of steam turbines (by total MW) for the last 4 years or so.   We're rapidly expanding and selling a lot of product.  We're also developing new technologies so we can continue to be successful in the future.

Its an exciting company to work for, and the only company that I've ever been with that I could see myself working at for the next 30 years.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I work for Toshiba in the power systems group .
Most people do n't realize that Toshiba has been working on power equipment for a long time .
We have certain blueprints from the 1930 's that are still being used today ( mostly small nuts/bolts , washers , etc ) .
We lead the US in new construction of steam turbines ( by total MW ) for the last 4 years or so .
We 're rapidly expanding and selling a lot of product .
We 're also developing new technologies so we can continue to be successful in the future .
Its an exciting company to work for , and the only company that I 've ever been with that I could see myself working at for the next 30 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I work for Toshiba in the power systems group.
Most people don't realize that Toshiba has been working on power equipment for a long time.
We have certain blueprints from the 1930's that are still being used today (mostly small nuts/bolts, washers, etc).
We lead the US in new construction of steam turbines (by total MW) for the last 4 years or so.
We're rapidly expanding and selling a lot of product.
We're also developing new technologies so we can continue to be successful in the future.
Its an exciting company to work for, and the only company that I've ever been with that I could see myself working at for the next 30 years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31603708</id>
	<title>Windows for a nuclear reactor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269425460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If Windows is going to power a nuclear reactor it will be the end of humanity. I say dump the nuclear idea and run a power station on the manure talked at Redmond - that should be enough to power China at the very least.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If Windows is going to power a nuclear reactor it will be the end of humanity .
I say dump the nuclear idea and run a power station on the manure talked at Redmond - that should be enough to power China at the very least .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Windows is going to power a nuclear reactor it will be the end of humanity.
I say dump the nuclear idea and run a power station on the manure talked at Redmond - that should be enough to power China at the very least.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587188</id>
	<title>If he'd really want to help the world...</title>
	<author>chord.wav</author>
	<datestamp>1269372240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If he'd really want to help the world, he'd make it open source and he would GPL it, but we know him already.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If he 'd really want to help the world , he 'd make it open source and he would GPL it , but we know him already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If he'd really want to help the world, he'd make it open source and he would GPL it, but we know him already.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584708</id>
	<title>A nuclear reactor and Bill Gates</title>
	<author>solid\_liq</author>
	<datestamp>1269363420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know about you, but I don't want to be anywhere a nuclear reactor that Bill Gates had any part in designing.  It's bad enough that computers running software he had a hand in creating have orders of magnitude more problems than software from any other source.  Put Bill Gates into the nuclear reactor business, and...  well, I shudder to think of the sheer magnitude of the potential for disaster there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know about you , but I do n't want to be anywhere a nuclear reactor that Bill Gates had any part in designing .
It 's bad enough that computers running software he had a hand in creating have orders of magnitude more problems than software from any other source .
Put Bill Gates into the nuclear reactor business , and... well , I shudder to think of the sheer magnitude of the potential for disaster there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know about you, but I don't want to be anywhere a nuclear reactor that Bill Gates had any part in designing.
It's bad enough that computers running software he had a hand in creating have orders of magnitude more problems than software from any other source.
Put Bill Gates into the nuclear reactor business, and...  well, I shudder to think of the sheer magnitude of the potential for disaster there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585346</id>
	<title>Why no thorium reactors?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269365700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have read a story about a month ago about radioactive thorium which has a lot of advantages over uranium.<br>P.S. can those small scale reactors produce plutonium?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have read a story about a month ago about radioactive thorium which has a lot of advantages over uranium.P.S .
can those small scale reactors produce plutonium ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have read a story about a month ago about radioactive thorium which has a lot of advantages over uranium.P.S.
can those small scale reactors produce plutonium?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585096</id>
	<title>vs Google</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269364920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google invests in Solar and Gates in Nuclear.<br>I prefer Google's approach.<br>http://www.google.org/rec.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google invests in Solar and Gates in Nuclear.I prefer Google 's approach.http : //www.google.org/rec.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google invests in Solar and Gates in Nuclear.I prefer Google's approach.http://www.google.org/rec.html</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585424</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>c6gunner</author>
	<datestamp>1269365940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why do they always have to be villains? Tony Stark wasn't a villain.</p></div><p>Sure he was.  He repeatedly broke the Laws of Physics.  We would have locked him away ages ago if that damn suit of his didn't make him invincible.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do they always have to be villains ?
Tony Stark was n't a villain.Sure he was .
He repeatedly broke the Laws of Physics .
We would have locked him away ages ago if that damn suit of his did n't make him invincible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do they always have to be villains?
Tony Stark wasn't a villain.Sure he was.
He repeatedly broke the Laws of Physics.
We would have locked him away ages ago if that damn suit of his didn't make him invincible.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584878</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>Migraineman</author>
	<datestamp>1269364080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I may be planning to build a small nuclear reactor as well.  Maybe.  At some point in the future.<br> <br>
Haven't decided on the hero/villain aspect, but I'm not a big fan of capes, regardless.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I may be planning to build a small nuclear reactor as well .
Maybe. At some point in the future .
Have n't decided on the hero/villain aspect , but I 'm not a big fan of capes , regardless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I may be planning to build a small nuclear reactor as well.
Maybe.  At some point in the future.
Haven't decided on the hero/villain aspect, but I'm not a big fan of capes, regardless.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584864</id>
	<title>Re:Non story</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269364020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tony Stark led a movement to create a national registry for all super-powered individuals, including their real identities (which means access to their families). Supers were required to become government agents and obey their new employers' orders.  This meant they could be hauled off to prison in the negative zone when they stepped out of line.</p><p>Tony Stark led the movement to force Supers to have a license to be alive, else they would be fugitives or imprisoned in the soul-destroying negative zone.  He's the modern Marvel equivalent of Stalin (no godwin for me).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tony Stark led a movement to create a national registry for all super-powered individuals , including their real identities ( which means access to their families ) .
Supers were required to become government agents and obey their new employers ' orders .
This meant they could be hauled off to prison in the negative zone when they stepped out of line.Tony Stark led the movement to force Supers to have a license to be alive , else they would be fugitives or imprisoned in the soul-destroying negative zone .
He 's the modern Marvel equivalent of Stalin ( no godwin for me ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tony Stark led a movement to create a national registry for all super-powered individuals, including their real identities (which means access to their families).
Supers were required to become government agents and obey their new employers' orders.
This meant they could be hauled off to prison in the negative zone when they stepped out of line.Tony Stark led the movement to force Supers to have a license to be alive, else they would be fugitives or imprisoned in the soul-destroying negative zone.
He's the modern Marvel equivalent of Stalin (no godwin for me).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31594334</id>
	<title>Something has to run it</title>
	<author>jtalle</author>
	<datestamp>1269369360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thank Ghu it won't be running Vista.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank Ghu it wo n't be running Vista .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank Ghu it won't be running Vista.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586982</id>
	<title>Re:. . . and the obligatory:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269371580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since we are talking about nuclear fission, I guessed that 640 neutrons ought be enough for anybody....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since we are talking about nuclear fission , I guessed that 640 neutrons ought be enough for anybody... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since we are talking about nuclear fission, I guessed that 640 neutrons ought be enough for anybody....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585594</id>
	<title>I was looking for something to power my DMC-12...</title>
	<author>seandiggity</author>
	<datestamp>1269366540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...but now it seems I have only a few decades to wait.  Will these devices reach the required 1.21 gigawatts?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...but now it seems I have only a few decades to wait .
Will these devices reach the required 1.21 gigawatts ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but now it seems I have only a few decades to wait.
Will these devices reach the required 1.21 gigawatts?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584302</id>
	<title>Maybe nothing will come of it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269361680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Intellectual Ventures, eh?  If you believe all those article in Techdirt (<a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100310/0302518496.shtml" title="techdirt.com" rel="nofollow">here</a> [techdirt.com],<br><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100301/0202228334.shtml" title="techdirt.com" rel="nofollow">here</a> [techdirt.com] and<br><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100223/0129458262.shtml" title="techdirt.com" rel="nofollow">here</a> [techdirt.com]), it is not so much a patent-holding concern as a patent-scam concern.  Maybe Gates is getting ready to milk the nuclear power industry in the same way it is milking the IT and communications industries.  If that is so, Gates just might save us from the perils of nuclear power, as the industry would be too busy defending itself in court to build any new plants.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Intellectual Ventures , eh ?
If you believe all those article in Techdirt ( here [ techdirt.com ] ,here [ techdirt.com ] andhere [ techdirt.com ] ) , it is not so much a patent-holding concern as a patent-scam concern .
Maybe Gates is getting ready to milk the nuclear power industry in the same way it is milking the IT and communications industries .
If that is so , Gates just might save us from the perils of nuclear power , as the industry would be too busy defending itself in court to build any new plants .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Intellectual Ventures, eh?
If you believe all those article in Techdirt (here [techdirt.com],here [techdirt.com] andhere [techdirt.com]), it is not so much a patent-holding concern as a patent-scam concern.
Maybe Gates is getting ready to milk the nuclear power industry in the same way it is milking the IT and communications industries.
If that is so, Gates just might save us from the perils of nuclear power, as the industry would be too busy defending itself in court to build any new plants.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584124</id>
	<title>Obvious concern...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269361080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Will the reactor be running Vista?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will the reactor be running Vista ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will the reactor be running Vista?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586030</id>
	<title>if gates builds like he did windows</title>
	<author>FudRucker</author>
	<datestamp>1269368100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>then were all in trouble, got iodine?</htmltext>
<tokenext>then were all in trouble , got iodine ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>then were all in trouble, got iodine?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585228</id>
	<title>Scientific American on fusion...</title>
	<author>sean.peters</author>
	<datestamp>1269365280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... the upshot: don't hold your breath. It turns out that achieving (or surpassing) energy break-even, as difficult as it is, is actually the least of your problems. Among the others: such reactors use deuterium/tritium fusion processes, and while deuterium is relatively plentiful on earth, tritium (with a half-life of around 5 days) is not. The reactor would need to breed its own tritium, and would need to do so with nearly 100\% efficiency (in other words, virtually all the deuterium supplied to the breeding process would have to be converted to tritium for later fusion). If efficiency falls even slightly too low, the reactor runs out of fuel. We don't have a clue how to produce tritium with that kind of efficiency.</p><p>Also, a fusion reactor would cost huge amounts of money to build, which means that it needs to run as close to 24/7 as possible to recoup the investment. We likewise don't have a clue how to keep feeding fuel into the system and removing the waste products - the laser fusion systems require fuel pellets to be fed into the system at a pretty high rate... and the machinery that does this needs to do it while being exposed to several tiny fusion explosions per second. The tokamak based systems need to pump in D/T at pretty steady rates, and remove He... while the fusion reaction is still going on. These are very, very difficult engineering problems, and work on them has scarcely begun.</p><p>Finally, no one really knows how to extract energy from the reactor in useful form - in a fission reactor, fissioning atoms heat up the bulk material of the reactor, and heat is carried away by some fluid, which then turns a turbine. In a fusion reactor, your energy is produced mainly in the form of neutrons (don't remember if these are slow, fast, or what)... and you get this energy out of the system... how? Again, work on this question has barely begun.</p><p>This is not to say that fusion would NEVER work as a means of energy generation... but it does mean that we're not close. For the foreseeable future, nuclear energy is going to continue to mean fission (for better or worse).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... the upshot : do n't hold your breath .
It turns out that achieving ( or surpassing ) energy break-even , as difficult as it is , is actually the least of your problems .
Among the others : such reactors use deuterium/tritium fusion processes , and while deuterium is relatively plentiful on earth , tritium ( with a half-life of around 5 days ) is not .
The reactor would need to breed its own tritium , and would need to do so with nearly 100 \ % efficiency ( in other words , virtually all the deuterium supplied to the breeding process would have to be converted to tritium for later fusion ) .
If efficiency falls even slightly too low , the reactor runs out of fuel .
We do n't have a clue how to produce tritium with that kind of efficiency.Also , a fusion reactor would cost huge amounts of money to build , which means that it needs to run as close to 24/7 as possible to recoup the investment .
We likewise do n't have a clue how to keep feeding fuel into the system and removing the waste products - the laser fusion systems require fuel pellets to be fed into the system at a pretty high rate... and the machinery that does this needs to do it while being exposed to several tiny fusion explosions per second .
The tokamak based systems need to pump in D/T at pretty steady rates , and remove He... while the fusion reaction is still going on .
These are very , very difficult engineering problems , and work on them has scarcely begun.Finally , no one really knows how to extract energy from the reactor in useful form - in a fission reactor , fissioning atoms heat up the bulk material of the reactor , and heat is carried away by some fluid , which then turns a turbine .
In a fusion reactor , your energy is produced mainly in the form of neutrons ( do n't remember if these are slow , fast , or what ) ... and you get this energy out of the system... how ? Again , work on this question has barely begun.This is not to say that fusion would NEVER work as a means of energy generation... but it does mean that we 're not close .
For the foreseeable future , nuclear energy is going to continue to mean fission ( for better or worse ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... the upshot: don't hold your breath.
It turns out that achieving (or surpassing) energy break-even, as difficult as it is, is actually the least of your problems.
Among the others: such reactors use deuterium/tritium fusion processes, and while deuterium is relatively plentiful on earth, tritium (with a half-life of around 5 days) is not.
The reactor would need to breed its own tritium, and would need to do so with nearly 100\% efficiency (in other words, virtually all the deuterium supplied to the breeding process would have to be converted to tritium for later fusion).
If efficiency falls even slightly too low, the reactor runs out of fuel.
We don't have a clue how to produce tritium with that kind of efficiency.Also, a fusion reactor would cost huge amounts of money to build, which means that it needs to run as close to 24/7 as possible to recoup the investment.
We likewise don't have a clue how to keep feeding fuel into the system and removing the waste products - the laser fusion systems require fuel pellets to be fed into the system at a pretty high rate... and the machinery that does this needs to do it while being exposed to several tiny fusion explosions per second.
The tokamak based systems need to pump in D/T at pretty steady rates, and remove He... while the fusion reaction is still going on.
These are very, very difficult engineering problems, and work on them has scarcely begun.Finally, no one really knows how to extract energy from the reactor in useful form - in a fission reactor, fissioning atoms heat up the bulk material of the reactor, and heat is carried away by some fluid, which then turns a turbine.
In a fusion reactor, your energy is produced mainly in the form of neutrons (don't remember if these are slow, fast, or what)... and you get this energy out of the system... how? Again, work on this question has barely begun.This is not to say that fusion would NEVER work as a means of energy generation... but it does mean that we're not close.
For the foreseeable future, nuclear energy is going to continue to mean fission (for better or worse).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584272</id>
	<title>Missing tag</title>
	<author>JaneTheIgnorantSlut</author>
	<datestamp>1269361620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Where is the "whatcouldpossiblygowrong" tag?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where is the " whatcouldpossiblygowrong " tag ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where is the "whatcouldpossiblygowrong" tag?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31588166
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587446
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31588902
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586694
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31590674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31599920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585352
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586222
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31599034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585154
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31593338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586862
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584976
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31599876
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31593360
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584160
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587812
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584864
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587406
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584406
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31588122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31610986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31592740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31588726
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31590336
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31608286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_23_1323204_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584672
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583784
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584368
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584558
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31593360
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31592740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586844
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585352
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587934
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586982
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587218
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583992
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584144
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585228
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31588726
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31590336
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584208
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585714
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583962
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584672
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584754
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583828
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585074
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31588166
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584748
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585770
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587406
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31599034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584056
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584474
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586358
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31599876
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585376
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587812
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587722
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586238
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586222
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31599920
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585154
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583974
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587984
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584234
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585424
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586252
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584590
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584878
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584134
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31590674
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585750
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587746
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587232
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584932
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583792
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587040
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584794
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586912
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583988
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586206
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31587866
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584228
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31588902
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584950
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584868
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31610986
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585096
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31588122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31586694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584428
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584292
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585280
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31593338
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_23_1323204.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31583858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31584072
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31585686
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_23_1323204.31608286
</commentlist>
</conversation>
