<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_21_2034243</id>
	<title>India First To Build a Supersonic Cruise Missile</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1269160440000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes with this excerpt: <i>"India successfully tested Sunday a <a href="http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/315099,india-test-fires-brahmos-supersonic-cruise-missile.html#ixzz0iq7D9ZaK">'maneuverable' version of the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile</a> which it has jointly developed with Russia, news reports said. The vertical-launch version of the 290-kilometer range BrahMos was tested from a warship in the Bay of Bengal off India's eastern coast, the PTI news agency reported. 'The vertical-launch version of missile was launched at 11:30 (0600 GMT) hours today from Indian Navy ship INS Ranvir and it manoeuvred successfully hitting the target ship. It was a perfect hit and a perfect mission,' BrahMos aerospace chief A Sivathanu Pillai was quoted as saying. 'After today's test, India has become the first and only country in the world to have a manoeuvrable supersonic cruise missile in its inventory,' Pillai said."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes with this excerpt : " India successfully tested Sunday a 'maneuverable ' version of the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile which it has jointly developed with Russia , news reports said .
The vertical-launch version of the 290-kilometer range BrahMos was tested from a warship in the Bay of Bengal off India 's eastern coast , the PTI news agency reported .
'The vertical-launch version of missile was launched at 11 : 30 ( 0600 GMT ) hours today from Indian Navy ship INS Ranvir and it manoeuvred successfully hitting the target ship .
It was a perfect hit and a perfect mission, ' BrahMos aerospace chief A Sivathanu Pillai was quoted as saying .
'After today 's test , India has become the first and only country in the world to have a manoeuvrable supersonic cruise missile in its inventory, ' Pillai said .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes with this excerpt: "India successfully tested Sunday a 'maneuverable' version of the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile which it has jointly developed with Russia, news reports said.
The vertical-launch version of the 290-kilometer range BrahMos was tested from a warship in the Bay of Bengal off India's eastern coast, the PTI news agency reported.
'The vertical-launch version of missile was launched at 11:30 (0600 GMT) hours today from Indian Navy ship INS Ranvir and it manoeuvred successfully hitting the target ship.
It was a perfect hit and a perfect mission,' BrahMos aerospace chief A Sivathanu Pillai was quoted as saying.
'After today's test, India has become the first and only country in the world to have a manoeuvrable supersonic cruise missile in its inventory,' Pillai said.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31562250</id>
	<title>Re:It's the unrecognized irony that kills you...</title>
	<author>slack\_prad</author>
	<datestamp>1269180900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Good fences make good neighbours"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Good fences make good neighbours "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Good fences make good neighbours"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31580066</id>
	<title>Speaking as an Indian..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269286440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..of the well moderated posts here a few do actually get it.</p><p>This is about China first and secondly America, and yes, it's for naval targets.</p><p>Why China?</p><p>It is projected that China will have the ability to build Aircraft Carriers within the next 5 years.. so this(very public) counter to that lets them know that they shouldn't get too cocky once they get their shiny new toys(similar to how China sent a big FU to the US when it blew up the satellite in orbit).</p><p>Why America?</p><p>Since America and India are now friends it would appear that this is not a big deal but, it really is. America is knee deep in Pakistan and has been over the last 4 decades in one form or another, and this has not been a good thing. There is a school of thought that says Pakistan would not even exist currently were it not for American meddling, how did America meddle? Does 1971 ring any bells? The USS Enterprise should really stay away unless invited.</p><p>http://www.rediff.com/news/2006/dec/26claude.htm</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..of the well moderated posts here a few do actually get it.This is about China first and secondly America , and yes , it 's for naval targets.Why China ? It is projected that China will have the ability to build Aircraft Carriers within the next 5 years.. so this ( very public ) counter to that lets them know that they should n't get too cocky once they get their shiny new toys ( similar to how China sent a big FU to the US when it blew up the satellite in orbit ) .Why America ? Since America and India are now friends it would appear that this is not a big deal but , it really is .
America is knee deep in Pakistan and has been over the last 4 decades in one form or another , and this has not been a good thing .
There is a school of thought that says Pakistan would not even exist currently were it not for American meddling , how did America meddle ?
Does 1971 ring any bells ?
The USS Enterprise should really stay away unless invited.http : //www.rediff.com/news/2006/dec/26claude.htm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..of the well moderated posts here a few do actually get it.This is about China first and secondly America, and yes, it's for naval targets.Why China?It is projected that China will have the ability to build Aircraft Carriers within the next 5 years.. so this(very public) counter to that lets them know that they shouldn't get too cocky once they get their shiny new toys(similar to how China sent a big FU to the US when it blew up the satellite in orbit).Why America?Since America and India are now friends it would appear that this is not a big deal but, it really is.
America is knee deep in Pakistan and has been over the last 4 decades in one form or another, and this has not been a good thing.
There is a school of thought that says Pakistan would not even exist currently were it not for American meddling, how did America meddle?
Does 1971 ring any bells?
The USS Enterprise should really stay away unless invited.http://www.rediff.com/news/2006/dec/26claude.htm</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31565130</id>
	<title>Re:Really!?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269259500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>nuclear powered supersonic cruise missile.</p></div></blockquote><p>So what we're waiting for is a Nuclear Powered SuperSonic Maneuverable Cruise Missiles with frickin' Laser beams, or NAMBLA for short. *evilpinky*</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>nuclear powered supersonic cruise missile.So what we 're waiting for is a Nuclear Powered SuperSonic Maneuverable Cruise Missiles with frickin ' Laser beams , or NAMBLA for short .
* evilpinky *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nuclear powered supersonic cruise missile.So what we're waiting for is a Nuclear Powered SuperSonic Maneuverable Cruise Missiles with frickin' Laser beams, or NAMBLA for short.
*evilpinky*
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31566288</id>
	<title>Correction</title>
	<author>aepervius</author>
	<datestamp>1269267360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Hard-liners in the middle east don't give half a shit about what India does. The Pakistanis do sure, but they already are nuclear. The hard-lines in the middle east want to go nuclear because of Israel.</i> I will fix that to you : The hard-lines in the middle east want to go nuclear because of the country they perceive as a threat, and which already have a nuclear arsenal : be it Israel or the US.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hard-liners in the middle east do n't give half a shit about what India does .
The Pakistanis do sure , but they already are nuclear .
The hard-lines in the middle east want to go nuclear because of Israel .
I will fix that to you : The hard-lines in the middle east want to go nuclear because of the country they perceive as a threat , and which already have a nuclear arsenal : be it Israel or the US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hard-liners in the middle east don't give half a shit about what India does.
The Pakistanis do sure, but they already are nuclear.
The hard-lines in the middle east want to go nuclear because of Israel.
I will fix that to you : The hard-lines in the middle east want to go nuclear because of the country they perceive as a threat, and which already have a nuclear arsenal : be it Israel or the US.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560142</id>
	<title>Tech Support Call</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269165840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Tech Support: Thank you for calling Maneuverable Supersonic Cruise Missile tech support, my name is Tom, how may I help you?<br>
Missile Owner: Hello. My maneuverable supersonic cruise missile isn't the <i>first</i>.<br>
Tech Support: I do apologize for this inconvenience. Am I correct to understand that your maneuverable supersonic cruise missile is not the first?<br>
Missile Owner: Uh, yeah. I was told it would be the first. <br>
Tech Support: I do apologize. Have you tried flashing the BIOS?<br>
Missile Owner: WTF?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tech Support : Thank you for calling Maneuverable Supersonic Cruise Missile tech support , my name is Tom , how may I help you ?
Missile Owner : Hello .
My maneuverable supersonic cruise missile is n't the first .
Tech Support : I do apologize for this inconvenience .
Am I correct to understand that your maneuverable supersonic cruise missile is not the first ?
Missile Owner : Uh , yeah .
I was told it would be the first .
Tech Support : I do apologize .
Have you tried flashing the BIOS ?
Missile Owner : WTF ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tech Support: Thank you for calling Maneuverable Supersonic Cruise Missile tech support, my name is Tom, how may I help you?
Missile Owner: Hello.
My maneuverable supersonic cruise missile isn't the first.
Tech Support: I do apologize for this inconvenience.
Am I correct to understand that your maneuverable supersonic cruise missile is not the first?
Missile Owner: Uh, yeah.
I was told it would be the first.
Tech Support: I do apologize.
Have you tried flashing the BIOS?
Missile Owner: WTF?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560314</id>
	<title>Re:Bad for Pakistan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269166920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since India has had nuke-capable ballistic missiles for some years, this doesn't actually add all that much to their nuclear capability.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since India has had nuke-capable ballistic missiles for some years , this does n't actually add all that much to their nuclear capability .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since India has had nuke-capable ballistic missiles for some years, this doesn't actually add all that much to their nuclear capability.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31576416</id>
	<title>Re:C'mon...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269256620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Can we PLEASE start spending all this cash on things that don't blow up?</p></div><p>Seems awfully inefficient to me.  After all, it's a lot easier to kill people with stuff that <i>does</i> blow up.</p></div><p>You can drop rocks. Rocks are pretty cheap, and if you hit something with a rock, collateral damage is minimal. Of course, this means the future of pacifism depends on banning rocks.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we PLEASE start spending all this cash on things that do n't blow up ? Seems awfully inefficient to me .
After all , it 's a lot easier to kill people with stuff that does blow up.You can drop rocks .
Rocks are pretty cheap , and if you hit something with a rock , collateral damage is minimal .
Of course , this means the future of pacifism depends on banning rocks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we PLEASE start spending all this cash on things that don't blow up?Seems awfully inefficient to me.
After all, it's a lot easier to kill people with stuff that does blow up.You can drop rocks.
Rocks are pretty cheap, and if you hit something with a rock, collateral damage is minimal.
Of course, this means the future of pacifism depends on banning rocks.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560854</id>
	<title>Re:Really!?</title>
	<author>the\_fat\_kid</author>
	<datestamp>1269170640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this one goes to Eleven!</p><p>but couldn't we just make "10" faster?</p><p>yes, but this one goes to Eleven.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this one goes to Eleven ! but could n't we just make " 10 " faster ? yes , but this one goes to Eleven .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this one goes to Eleven!but couldn't we just make "10" faster?yes, but this one goes to Eleven.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31564066</id>
	<title>Good Job</title>
	<author>reakonbbey</author>
	<datestamp>1269198120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is really gonna maintain power balance in South Asia. Keep it up the good work!!
<a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/health-articles/muscle-boost-review-does-muscle-boost-really-work-1972189.html" title="articlesbase.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.articlesbase.com/health-articles/muscle-boost-review-does-muscle-boost-really-work-1972189.html</a> [articlesbase.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is really gon na maintain power balance in South Asia .
Keep it up the good work ! !
http : //www.articlesbase.com/health-articles/muscle-boost-review-does-muscle-boost-really-work-1972189.html [ articlesbase.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is really gonna maintain power balance in South Asia.
Keep it up the good work!!
http://www.articlesbase.com/health-articles/muscle-boost-review-does-muscle-boost-really-work-1972189.html [articlesbase.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31562110</id>
	<title>Re:Misleading headline</title>
	<author>TCPhotography</author>
	<datestamp>1269180060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-28\_Hound\_Dog" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Nor the first to deploy</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nor the first to deploy [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nor the first to deploy [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559978</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559952</id>
	<title>Great -</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269164640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That plus a nuke warhead sounds great for killing big carriers. If push really comes to shove kiss power projection in the Indian Ocean goodbye.   I wonder how long it will take China to buy one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That plus a nuke warhead sounds great for killing big carriers .
If push really comes to shove kiss power projection in the Indian Ocean goodbye .
I wonder how long it will take China to buy one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That plus a nuke warhead sounds great for killing big carriers.
If push really comes to shove kiss power projection in the Indian Ocean goodbye.
I wonder how long it will take China to buy one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563706</id>
	<title>Re:Cruise Missile?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269193260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>a Tomahawk can also fly down a main street in Bagdad and make a left turn at the lights, im sure there was a video of this from the first Gulf war.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>a Tomahawk can also fly down a main street in Bagdad and make a left turn at the lights , im sure there was a video of this from the first Gulf war .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a Tomahawk can also fly down a main street in Bagdad and make a left turn at the lights, im sure there was a video of this from the first Gulf war.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560086</id>
	<title>Bad for Pakistan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269165420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I doubt Pakistan can be happy at all about this development.  It's one thing to have a nuke, another to be able to deliver it.  This makes a first strike weapon from Hell.  About the time you figure out the war is on....it's over.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt Pakistan can be happy at all about this development .
It 's one thing to have a nuke , another to be able to deliver it .
This makes a first strike weapon from Hell .
About the time you figure out the war is on....it 's over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt Pakistan can be happy at all about this development.
It's one thing to have a nuke, another to be able to deliver it.
This makes a first strike weapon from Hell.
About the time you figure out the war is on....it's over.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559974</id>
	<title>Surprise!</title>
	<author>SEWilco</author>
	<datestamp>1269164700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I didn't hear that coming.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't hear that coming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't hear that coming.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560102</id>
	<title>Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269165540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't one of the benefits of cruise missiles is that they are quiet and low altitude enough (terrain following to a degree) that they are hard to spot, preventing intercepts?  A supersonic missile sort of defeats this purpose - it can't be too maneuverable if it is supersonic and is much more readily acquired than subsonic missiles would be.  Sort of a hybrid of ballistic missile and cruise missile with some of the strengths and weaknesses of each I guess, but with radically reduced range.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't one of the benefits of cruise missiles is that they are quiet and low altitude enough ( terrain following to a degree ) that they are hard to spot , preventing intercepts ?
A supersonic missile sort of defeats this purpose - it ca n't be too maneuverable if it is supersonic and is much more readily acquired than subsonic missiles would be .
Sort of a hybrid of ballistic missile and cruise missile with some of the strengths and weaknesses of each I guess , but with radically reduced range .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't one of the benefits of cruise missiles is that they are quiet and low altitude enough (terrain following to a degree) that they are hard to spot, preventing intercepts?
A supersonic missile sort of defeats this purpose - it can't be too maneuverable if it is supersonic and is much more readily acquired than subsonic missiles would be.
Sort of a hybrid of ballistic missile and cruise missile with some of the strengths and weaknesses of each I guess, but with radically reduced range.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560374</id>
	<title>Re:Misleading headline</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1269167280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not the <a href="http://astronautix.com/lvs/bomarc.htm" title="astronautix.com">first to deploy</a> [astronautix.com] either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not the first to deploy [ astronautix.com ] either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not the first to deploy [astronautix.com] either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559978</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563912</id>
	<title>Re:Not about Pakistan</title>
	<author>Sycraft-fu</author>
	<datestamp>1269195900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He may be thinking of the new electrically fired variant the Navy is interested in. The Metal Storm, an Australian product, stacks bullets on top of each other in barrels and fires them electrically. Allows for amazing rates of fire up to 1 million rounds per minute. The US Navy has been looking at the technology as a CIWS replacement. Something that has completely variable rates of fire and can have those rates go up to insane levels could be quite useful. As far as I know it is still in development stages though, nothing testing or ready for deployment. The original Metal Storm is just a demo unit that fires normal pistol sized rounds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He may be thinking of the new electrically fired variant the Navy is interested in .
The Metal Storm , an Australian product , stacks bullets on top of each other in barrels and fires them electrically .
Allows for amazing rates of fire up to 1 million rounds per minute .
The US Navy has been looking at the technology as a CIWS replacement .
Something that has completely variable rates of fire and can have those rates go up to insane levels could be quite useful .
As far as I know it is still in development stages though , nothing testing or ready for deployment .
The original Metal Storm is just a demo unit that fires normal pistol sized rounds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He may be thinking of the new electrically fired variant the Navy is interested in.
The Metal Storm, an Australian product, stacks bullets on top of each other in barrels and fires them electrically.
Allows for amazing rates of fire up to 1 million rounds per minute.
The US Navy has been looking at the technology as a CIWS replacement.
Something that has completely variable rates of fire and can have those rates go up to insane levels could be quite useful.
As far as I know it is still in development stages though, nothing testing or ready for deployment.
The original Metal Storm is just a demo unit that fires normal pistol sized rounds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560038</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>Nmonic</author>
	<datestamp>1269165060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not really.

A Quick check of Wiki shows that India is definitely not the first or only to have a supersonic cruise missile.   This is just India's first...  not a world first.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not really .
A Quick check of Wiki shows that India is definitely not the first or only to have a supersonic cruise missile .
This is just India 's first... not a world first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not really.
A Quick check of Wiki shows that India is definitely not the first or only to have a supersonic cruise missile.
This is just India's first...  not a world first.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563226</id>
	<title>Course adjustment characteristics</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269189000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Besides being supersonic, they are also very hard to hit because of the 5 to 8 relatively long resonant rhythmic sonic distraction sequences (vulgarly called 'song and dance') that occur per flight. On the other hand, it buys the target that much more time to, oh, sing and dance along, maybe. It's a mixed-benefit strategy, I suppose.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;p</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Besides being supersonic , they are also very hard to hit because of the 5 to 8 relatively long resonant rhythmic sonic distraction sequences ( vulgarly called 'song and dance ' ) that occur per flight .
On the other hand , it buys the target that much more time to , oh , sing and dance along , maybe .
It 's a mixed-benefit strategy , I suppose .
; p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Besides being supersonic, they are also very hard to hit because of the 5 to 8 relatively long resonant rhythmic sonic distraction sequences (vulgarly called 'song and dance') that occur per flight.
On the other hand, it buys the target that much more time to, oh, sing and dance along, maybe.
It's a mixed-benefit strategy, I suppose.
;p</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559978</id>
	<title>Misleading headline</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269164760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Possibly first to deploy, but <a href="http://astronautix.com/lvs/navaho.htm" title="astronautix.com">not the first to build</a> [astronautix.com], by a good 50 years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Possibly first to deploy , but not the first to build [ astronautix.com ] , by a good 50 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Possibly first to deploy, but not the first to build [astronautix.com], by a good 50 years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561364</id>
	<title>Re:Really!?</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1269174660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nuclear power comes in one form: heat.  Heat is what jet engines and rockets run on.</p><p>You need to read up on nuclear rockets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nuclear power comes in one form : heat .
Heat is what jet engines and rockets run on.You need to read up on nuclear rockets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nuclear power comes in one form: heat.
Heat is what jet engines and rockets run on.You need to read up on nuclear rockets.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560774</id>
	<title>Re:Surprise!</title>
	<author>EdIII</author>
	<datestamp>1269170100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I barely felt mine coming before it was too late.  Of course my version of the Indian Supersonic Cruise Missile involved some very spicy beef curry and rice....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I barely felt mine coming before it was too late .
Of course my version of the Indian Supersonic Cruise Missile involved some very spicy beef curry and rice... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I barely felt mine coming before it was too late.
Of course my version of the Indian Supersonic Cruise Missile involved some very spicy beef curry and rice....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560322</id>
	<title>Re:Really!?</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1269166980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hehehe, the Ruskies stuck one into them Indians.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hehehe , the Ruskies stuck one into them Indians .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hehehe, the Ruskies stuck one into them Indians.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560522</id>
	<title>Re:Headline wrong, as is the article</title>
	<author>iamhassi</author>
	<datestamp>1269168360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"The P-500 Bazalt is a liquid-fueled, rocket powered, supersonic cruise missile used by the Soviet and Russian navies. "</i>
<br> <br>
<i>"India successfully tested Sunday a "maneuverable" version of the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile which it has jointly developed with Russia."</i>
<br> <br>
So Russia found a 40 yr old Bazalt in their basement and "developed" it with India?  India didn't even get the good version, they got the crappy one that only holds 200kg with a 290km range.  FAIL</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The P-500 Bazalt is a liquid-fueled , rocket powered , supersonic cruise missile used by the Soviet and Russian navies .
" " India successfully tested Sunday a " maneuverable " version of the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile which it has jointly developed with Russia .
" So Russia found a 40 yr old Bazalt in their basement and " developed " it with India ?
India did n't even get the good version , they got the crappy one that only holds 200kg with a 290km range .
FAIL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The P-500 Bazalt is a liquid-fueled, rocket powered, supersonic cruise missile used by the Soviet and Russian navies.
"
 
"India successfully tested Sunday a "maneuverable" version of the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile which it has jointly developed with Russia.
"
 
So Russia found a 40 yr old Bazalt in their basement and "developed" it with India?
India didn't even get the good version, they got the crappy one that only holds 200kg with a 290km range.
FAIL</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31564680</id>
	<title>Re:Headline wrong, as is the article</title>
	<author>SplashMyBandit</author>
	<datestamp>1269251940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The US does have supersonic air-to-surface missiles. Rather than make their missiles fast the US appears to be relying on three factors to give them the edge. Firstly, the Harpoon is subsonic but it flies slightly lower than the BrahMos. It's only 10 meters lower but that makes a big difference to the radar horizon and hence detection range. The second factor coming in US missiles is the stealth missiles fired from air platforms (AGM-158 JASSM). The final factor is the fact that US missiles are generally more reliable on launch than missiles used by other countries.
<p>
On the defensive side. The US has recently been testing Aegis against supersonic targets (purchased recently). It's not like the USN are asleep at the switch to this. Phalanx, Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM), ECM and decoys and the right software give a fighting chance against BrahMos - assuming a launching vessel can get within combat radius of the wing of F/A-18s on the carrier and their Harpoons (several times the range of the BrahMos).
</p><p>
The whole article sounds like a marketing ploy by the manufacturers, trying to re-coup their costs. Remember the breathless reporting of the MiG-25 back in it's day? In truth it turned out to be less effective than first feared (although not entirely in-effective, it did run down and kill one F/A-18 in the Gulf War, but one example doesn't win you an entire war).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The US does have supersonic air-to-surface missiles .
Rather than make their missiles fast the US appears to be relying on three factors to give them the edge .
Firstly , the Harpoon is subsonic but it flies slightly lower than the BrahMos .
It 's only 10 meters lower but that makes a big difference to the radar horizon and hence detection range .
The second factor coming in US missiles is the stealth missiles fired from air platforms ( AGM-158 JASSM ) .
The final factor is the fact that US missiles are generally more reliable on launch than missiles used by other countries .
On the defensive side .
The US has recently been testing Aegis against supersonic targets ( purchased recently ) .
It 's not like the USN are asleep at the switch to this .
Phalanx , Rolling Airframe Missile ( RAM ) , ECM and decoys and the right software give a fighting chance against BrahMos - assuming a launching vessel can get within combat radius of the wing of F/A-18s on the carrier and their Harpoons ( several times the range of the BrahMos ) .
The whole article sounds like a marketing ploy by the manufacturers , trying to re-coup their costs .
Remember the breathless reporting of the MiG-25 back in it 's day ?
In truth it turned out to be less effective than first feared ( although not entirely in-effective , it did run down and kill one F/A-18 in the Gulf War , but one example does n't win you an entire war ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The US does have supersonic air-to-surface missiles.
Rather than make their missiles fast the US appears to be relying on three factors to give them the edge.
Firstly, the Harpoon is subsonic but it flies slightly lower than the BrahMos.
It's only 10 meters lower but that makes a big difference to the radar horizon and hence detection range.
The second factor coming in US missiles is the stealth missiles fired from air platforms (AGM-158 JASSM).
The final factor is the fact that US missiles are generally more reliable on launch than missiles used by other countries.
On the defensive side.
The US has recently been testing Aegis against supersonic targets (purchased recently).
It's not like the USN are asleep at the switch to this.
Phalanx, Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM), ECM and decoys and the right software give a fighting chance against BrahMos - assuming a launching vessel can get within combat radius of the wing of F/A-18s on the carrier and their Harpoons (several times the range of the BrahMos).
The whole article sounds like a marketing ploy by the manufacturers, trying to re-coup their costs.
Remember the breathless reporting of the MiG-25 back in it's day?
In truth it turned out to be less effective than first feared (although not entirely in-effective, it did run down and kill one F/A-18 in the Gulf War, but one example doesn't win you an entire war).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560336</id>
	<title>All about the Range</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269167100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Supersonic is all well and good with a 290km range. But when someone else can hit you from 2500km (BTM-109 tomahawk) with a sub sonic missile is it really worth it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Supersonic is all well and good with a 290km range .
But when someone else can hit you from 2500km ( BTM-109 tomahawk ) with a sub sonic missile is it really worth it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Supersonic is all well and good with a 290km range.
But when someone else can hit you from 2500km (BTM-109 tomahawk) with a sub sonic missile is it really worth it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560358</id>
	<title>Re:Bad for Pakistan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269167160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pakistan already operates the Yingji-83/C-803 which has a supersonic terminal stage and more than adequate missiles in her bag to act as a huge deterrent.<br>Pakistan has nothing to fear.</p><p>Anyways India has a no first use nuke policy. Pakistan has no such policy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pakistan already operates the Yingji-83/C-803 which has a supersonic terminal stage and more than adequate missiles in her bag to act as a huge deterrent.Pakistan has nothing to fear.Anyways India has a no first use nuke policy .
Pakistan has no such policy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pakistan already operates the Yingji-83/C-803 which has a supersonic terminal stage and more than adequate missiles in her bag to act as a huge deterrent.Pakistan has nothing to fear.Anyways India has a no first use nuke policy.
Pakistan has no such policy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31564354</id>
	<title>Re:Tech Support Call</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269289200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How the eff is that funny? There are already a dozen call call center jokes out there.</p><p>PS: the reason the tech support asks such stupid questions is because the users (you) are really dumb at times</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How the eff is that funny ?
There are already a dozen call call center jokes out there.PS : the reason the tech support asks such stupid questions is because the users ( you ) are really dumb at times</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How the eff is that funny?
There are already a dozen call call center jokes out there.PS: the reason the tech support asks such stupid questions is because the users (you) are really dumb at times</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563422</id>
	<title>Re:Headline wrong, as is the article</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269191040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not an aerospace engineer, but I've watched a lot of television shows and I saw Superman where they showed a cruise missile so I feel that I'm qualified to discuss this. See, what they'd call this is a "broken arrow" where the deviated septum ( "lighting the candle" in rocket science speak) can induce graviton waves in the fabric of space time.  These perturbations in the ether, detectable by a modification of the Green-Witten equation vis a vis "eigenspace vector", lead to a Magellan Fund fluctuation. We can demonstrate by solving for the Hippocampus Equation of Polyandric Tri-Couple state wAgEs(sin())=dth. Solving for the unbounded state where cos(pLAy) = FuN, we can solve the n-value equation by holding three of the variables constant, leading to (beta)U*tan(Me).</p><p>(I kid, I kid... thanks for the explanation)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not an aerospace engineer , but I 've watched a lot of television shows and I saw Superman where they showed a cruise missile so I feel that I 'm qualified to discuss this .
See , what they 'd call this is a " broken arrow " where the deviated septum ( " lighting the candle " in rocket science speak ) can induce graviton waves in the fabric of space time .
These perturbations in the ether , detectable by a modification of the Green-Witten equation vis a vis " eigenspace vector " , lead to a Magellan Fund fluctuation .
We can demonstrate by solving for the Hippocampus Equation of Polyandric Tri-Couple state wAgEs ( sin ( ) ) = dth .
Solving for the unbounded state where cos ( pLAy ) = FuN , we can solve the n-value equation by holding three of the variables constant , leading to ( beta ) U * tan ( Me ) .
( I kid , I kid... thanks for the explanation )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not an aerospace engineer, but I've watched a lot of television shows and I saw Superman where they showed a cruise missile so I feel that I'm qualified to discuss this.
See, what they'd call this is a "broken arrow" where the deviated septum ( "lighting the candle" in rocket science speak) can induce graviton waves in the fabric of space time.
These perturbations in the ether, detectable by a modification of the Green-Witten equation vis a vis "eigenspace vector", lead to a Magellan Fund fluctuation.
We can demonstrate by solving for the Hippocampus Equation of Polyandric Tri-Couple state wAgEs(sin())=dth.
Solving for the unbounded state where cos(pLAy) = FuN, we can solve the n-value equation by holding three of the variables constant, leading to (beta)U*tan(Me).
(I kid, I kid... thanks for the explanation)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559950</id>
	<title>Really!?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269164640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seems to me that cruise missiles have been around for a while, and one of the defining properties is that it 'steers'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems to me that cruise missiles have been around for a while , and one of the defining properties is that it 'steers'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems to me that cruise missiles have been around for a while, and one of the defining properties is that it 'steers'</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561700</id>
	<title>Maneuverable</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269177240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By "maneuverable" they mean that it can be launched from mobile land-based launchers. That makes it different from the supposed other examples being mentioned in some other threads here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By " maneuverable " they mean that it can be launched from mobile land-based launchers .
That makes it different from the supposed other examples being mentioned in some other threads here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By "maneuverable" they mean that it can be launched from mobile land-based launchers.
That makes it different from the supposed other examples being mentioned in some other threads here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563930</id>
	<title>India defence spending is actually falling..</title>
	<author>tanveer1979</author>
	<datestamp>1269196080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For example, in the latest budget, there was no increase in spending, w.r.t increase in the GDP etc., For an economy that grows more than 7\% every year, the defense spending does not follow this curver</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For example , in the latest budget , there was no increase in spending , w.r.t increase in the GDP etc. , For an economy that grows more than 7 \ % every year , the defense spending does not follow this curver</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For example, in the latest budget, there was no increase in spending, w.r.t increase in the GDP etc., For an economy that grows more than 7\% every year, the defense spending does not follow this curver</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559996</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>burni2</author>
	<datestamp>1269164880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, you were the first poster<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , you were the first poster : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, you were the first poster :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561474</id>
	<title>Re:Really!?</title>
	<author>SEWilco</author>
	<datestamp>1269175500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, a cruise missile is one with a long-distance cruising mode.  The ability of it to steer merely makes its routing and targeting more precise.  The V-1 "buzz bomb" was a cruise missile which could not be aimed well.  This steering technology makes the missile more practical to use, and much more effective than slower ones.  If the missile has to travel 300 miles over hostile terrain, the enemy may have an hour to react to it.  There's a drastic difference between having having one hour and having a half hour (or less).</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , a cruise missile is one with a long-distance cruising mode .
The ability of it to steer merely makes its routing and targeting more precise .
The V-1 " buzz bomb " was a cruise missile which could not be aimed well .
This steering technology makes the missile more practical to use , and much more effective than slower ones .
If the missile has to travel 300 miles over hostile terrain , the enemy may have an hour to react to it .
There 's a drastic difference between having having one hour and having a half hour ( or less ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, a cruise missile is one with a long-distance cruising mode.
The ability of it to steer merely makes its routing and targeting more precise.
The V-1 "buzz bomb" was a cruise missile which could not be aimed well.
This steering technology makes the missile more practical to use, and much more effective than slower ones.
If the missile has to travel 300 miles over hostile terrain, the enemy may have an hour to react to it.
There's a drastic difference between having having one hour and having a half hour (or less).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561086</id>
	<title>Re: Nuclear powered, or nuclear armed?</title>
	<author>colinnwn</author>
	<datestamp>1269172080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If it is similar to the nuclear powered aircraft we considered building, but let good sense prevail, thank goodness. The nuclear powered airplane would have sprayed so much radioactive fallout during operation, that it didn't need to be armed with anything. Just flying around over a populated area would kill most of the residents within a couple days if they didn't GTH out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it is similar to the nuclear powered aircraft we considered building , but let good sense prevail , thank goodness .
The nuclear powered airplane would have sprayed so much radioactive fallout during operation , that it did n't need to be armed with anything .
Just flying around over a populated area would kill most of the residents within a couple days if they did n't GTH out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it is similar to the nuclear powered aircraft we considered building, but let good sense prevail, thank goodness.
The nuclear powered airplane would have sprayed so much radioactive fallout during operation, that it didn't need to be armed with anything.
Just flying around over a populated area would kill most of the residents within a couple days if they didn't GTH out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563176</id>
	<title>Re:Bad for Pakistan</title>
	<author>brunokummel</author>
	<datestamp>1269188520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I doubt Pakistan can be happy at all about this development.  It's one thing to have a nuke, another to be able to deliver it.  This makes a first strike weapon from Hell.  About the time you figure out the war is on....it's over.</p></div><p>
What keeps them to shoot each other then? IMHO is the effect that a first strike would cause on the striker itself, for example, if India strikes first, all the islamic world will come down on India, and if Pakistan launches it first, all the rest of the world will come down on them. As it alway has been, Nukes are more like a strategy weapon than a tactical one. You only have it to be able to threat your enemy not to kill him.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt Pakistan can be happy at all about this development .
It 's one thing to have a nuke , another to be able to deliver it .
This makes a first strike weapon from Hell .
About the time you figure out the war is on....it 's over .
What keeps them to shoot each other then ?
IMHO is the effect that a first strike would cause on the striker itself , for example , if India strikes first , all the islamic world will come down on India , and if Pakistan launches it first , all the rest of the world will come down on them .
As it alway has been , Nukes are more like a strategy weapon than a tactical one .
You only have it to be able to threat your enemy not to kill him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt Pakistan can be happy at all about this development.
It's one thing to have a nuke, another to be able to deliver it.
This makes a first strike weapon from Hell.
About the time you figure out the war is on....it's over.
What keeps them to shoot each other then?
IMHO is the effect that a first strike would cause on the striker itself, for example, if India strikes first, all the islamic world will come down on India, and if Pakistan launches it first, all the rest of the world will come down on them.
As it alway has been, Nukes are more like a strategy weapon than a tactical one.
You only have it to be able to threat your enemy not to kill him.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561128</id>
	<title>Just in time...</title>
	<author>jcr</author>
	<datestamp>1269172320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Supersonic cruise missiles should be hitting the market just about the time that shipboard anti-missile lasers do.</p><p>-jcr</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Supersonic cruise missiles should be hitting the market just about the time that shipboard anti-missile lasers do.-jcr</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Supersonic cruise missiles should be hitting the market just about the time that shipboard anti-missile lasers do.-jcr</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561304</id>
	<title>Re:Thanks, India</title>
	<author>Wyatt Earp</author>
	<datestamp>1269173940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If Israel wasn't there Iran would be trying to go nuclear because of Saudi Arabia. If Iraq hadn't been pummeled in 1991 it'd be Iran's "justification" for going nuclear. Or Pakistan would be.</p><p>Its easy to blame Israel for Iraq and Iran trying to go nuclear but thats just it, the easy answer. Its similar to the justification for the US/UK to go nuclear, Germany was the motivator but when they failed the threat became Imperial Japan and then the Soviet Union.</p><p>And when we look at the rhetoric, Israel has never threatened a neighbor with nuclear weapons, the closest they came was to fly high performance fighters over Cairo, Aswan High and Damascus during the October War to show that the integrated air defense networks wouldn't protect against a strike.</p><p>Iran on the other hand has been more vocal about intentions towards Israel. "...the Zionist Regime that is a usurper and illegitimate regime and a cancerous tumor should be wiped off the map."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If Israel was n't there Iran would be trying to go nuclear because of Saudi Arabia .
If Iraq had n't been pummeled in 1991 it 'd be Iran 's " justification " for going nuclear .
Or Pakistan would be.Its easy to blame Israel for Iraq and Iran trying to go nuclear but thats just it , the easy answer .
Its similar to the justification for the US/UK to go nuclear , Germany was the motivator but when they failed the threat became Imperial Japan and then the Soviet Union.And when we look at the rhetoric , Israel has never threatened a neighbor with nuclear weapons , the closest they came was to fly high performance fighters over Cairo , Aswan High and Damascus during the October War to show that the integrated air defense networks would n't protect against a strike.Iran on the other hand has been more vocal about intentions towards Israel .
" ...the Zionist Regime that is a usurper and illegitimate regime and a cancerous tumor should be wiped off the map .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Israel wasn't there Iran would be trying to go nuclear because of Saudi Arabia.
If Iraq hadn't been pummeled in 1991 it'd be Iran's "justification" for going nuclear.
Or Pakistan would be.Its easy to blame Israel for Iraq and Iran trying to go nuclear but thats just it, the easy answer.
Its similar to the justification for the US/UK to go nuclear, Germany was the motivator but when they failed the threat became Imperial Japan and then the Soviet Union.And when we look at the rhetoric, Israel has never threatened a neighbor with nuclear weapons, the closest they came was to fly high performance fighters over Cairo, Aswan High and Damascus during the October War to show that the integrated air defense networks wouldn't protect against a strike.Iran on the other hand has been more vocal about intentions towards Israel.
"...the Zionist Regime that is a usurper and illegitimate regime and a cancerous tumor should be wiped off the map.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31568174</id>
	<title>Re:Tech Support Call</title>
	<author>billy8988</author>
	<datestamp>1269272220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Come on guys...Funny (5)? Really?<br>It's getting old...any article about India is followed with a obligatory tech support joke.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on guys...Funny ( 5 ) ?
Really ? It 's getting old...any article about India is followed with a obligatory tech support joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on guys...Funny (5)?
Really?It's getting old...any article about India is followed with a obligatory tech support joke.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561426</id>
	<title>Re:Really!?</title>
	<author>ElGuapo2872</author>
	<datestamp>1269175200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The nuclear powered cruise missile you are thinking about was under development in the 60s as Project Pluto.  It was to be a ramjet powered cruise missile that would carry multiple nuclear bombs and would act as more an automated bomber than what we would think of as a cruise missile.  It was to fly very fast and had an unshielded reactor.  It was thought that the radiation and the sonic booms would be lethal enough that one could simply fly them back and forth and not drop any bombs at all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The nuclear powered cruise missile you are thinking about was under development in the 60s as Project Pluto .
It was to be a ramjet powered cruise missile that would carry multiple nuclear bombs and would act as more an automated bomber than what we would think of as a cruise missile .
It was to fly very fast and had an unshielded reactor .
It was thought that the radiation and the sonic booms would be lethal enough that one could simply fly them back and forth and not drop any bombs at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The nuclear powered cruise missile you are thinking about was under development in the 60s as Project Pluto.
It was to be a ramjet powered cruise missile that would carry multiple nuclear bombs and would act as more an automated bomber than what we would think of as a cruise missile.
It was to fly very fast and had an unshielded reactor.
It was thought that the radiation and the sonic booms would be lethal enough that one could simply fly them back and forth and not drop any bombs at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563920</id>
	<title>Re:Bah</title>
	<author>Angst Badger</author>
	<datestamp>1269195960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Bah. Wake me up when they have a maneuverable superluminal cruise missile.</p></div><p>They already have. The problem is that it hits its targets about five thousand years before it is launched.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bah .
Wake me up when they have a maneuverable superluminal cruise missile.They already have .
The problem is that it hits its targets about five thousand years before it is launched .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bah.
Wake me up when they have a maneuverable superluminal cruise missile.They already have.
The problem is that it hits its targets about five thousand years before it is launched.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560586</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560212</id>
	<title>Re:Thanks, India</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269166260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hard-liners in the middle east don't give half a shit about what India does.  The Pakistanis do sure, but they <i>already are nuclear</i>.  The hard-lines in the middle east want to go nuclear <i>because of Israel</i>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hard-liners in the middle east do n't give half a shit about what India does .
The Pakistanis do sure , but they already are nuclear .
The hard-lines in the middle east want to go nuclear because of Israel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hard-liners in the middle east don't give half a shit about what India does.
The Pakistanis do sure, but they already are nuclear.
The hard-lines in the middle east want to go nuclear because of Israel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31562374</id>
	<title>Re:Headline wrong, as is the article</title>
	<author>AbhiSL</author>
	<datestamp>1269181800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is the first "solid fueled" Supersonic "Maneuverable" Cruise Missile.

Not Liquid fueled one, like the ancient American ones or vintage variety of USSR.
Also the Vintage variety needs to be fueled just before it is to be fired. This is a real waste of time in war scenes. There is zero fueling time for Bhramos as opposed to the earlier variety.
Liquid Fueled ones are easy to Control as the fuel ignition can be controlled to direct the missiles. However the solid fueled ones need sophisticated systems (that USA does'nt have the money or Talent to invest in) as once the solid fuel starts propelling the missile, it cannot be slowed or shutdown to direct the missile.

Jai Hind</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the first " solid fueled " Supersonic " Maneuverable " Cruise Missile .
Not Liquid fueled one , like the ancient American ones or vintage variety of USSR .
Also the Vintage variety needs to be fueled just before it is to be fired .
This is a real waste of time in war scenes .
There is zero fueling time for Bhramos as opposed to the earlier variety .
Liquid Fueled ones are easy to Control as the fuel ignition can be controlled to direct the missiles .
However the solid fueled ones need sophisticated systems ( that USA does'nt have the money or Talent to invest in ) as once the solid fuel starts propelling the missile , it can not be slowed or shutdown to direct the missile .
Jai Hind</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the first "solid fueled" Supersonic "Maneuverable" Cruise Missile.
Not Liquid fueled one, like the ancient American ones or vintage variety of USSR.
Also the Vintage variety needs to be fueled just before it is to be fired.
This is a real waste of time in war scenes.
There is zero fueling time for Bhramos as opposed to the earlier variety.
Liquid Fueled ones are easy to Control as the fuel ignition can be controlled to direct the missiles.
However the solid fueled ones need sophisticated systems (that USA does'nt have the money or Talent to invest in) as once the solid fuel starts propelling the missile, it cannot be slowed or shutdown to direct the missile.
Jai Hind</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31569694</id>
	<title>Re:Tech Support Call</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269276420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tech Support: Has your lazy ass read through previous posts<br>Missile Owner: No. I am from public school. Can't Read<br>Tech Support: Well. Previous posts show that the headline in the submission was incorrect, the others missiles - Russian - were course adjusting not maneuverable and only to a certain point in the flight. This missile is maneuverable over the entire flight.<br>Tech Support: thank you and come back again. Your public school education helps support the tech support.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tech Support : Has your lazy ass read through previous postsMissile Owner : No .
I am from public school .
Ca n't ReadTech Support : Well .
Previous posts show that the headline in the submission was incorrect , the others missiles - Russian - were course adjusting not maneuverable and only to a certain point in the flight .
This missile is maneuverable over the entire flight.Tech Support : thank you and come back again .
Your public school education helps support the tech support .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tech Support: Has your lazy ass read through previous postsMissile Owner: No.
I am from public school.
Can't ReadTech Support: Well.
Previous posts show that the headline in the submission was incorrect, the others missiles - Russian - were course adjusting not maneuverable and only to a certain point in the flight.
This missile is maneuverable over the entire flight.Tech Support: thank you and come back again.
Your public school education helps support the tech support.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31562614</id>
	<title>Oh, cool.</title>
	<author>WindBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1269183780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>THink that it can outdo a rail gun or a laser? Yeah, exactly. but that Russian supersonic cruise missile WILL be useful against China.</htmltext>
<tokenext>THink that it can outdo a rail gun or a laser ?
Yeah , exactly .
but that Russian supersonic cruise missile WILL be useful against China .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>THink that it can outdo a rail gun or a laser?
Yeah, exactly.
but that Russian supersonic cruise missile WILL be useful against China.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561142</id>
	<title>Brahmos ? wht is that tag .....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269172380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>isnt it 'brahmins' ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>isnt it 'brahmins ' ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>isnt it 'brahmins' ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31562308</id>
	<title>Re:Misleading headline</title>
	<author>AbhiSL</author>
	<datestamp>1269181320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Possibly first to deploy, but <a href="http://astronautix.com/lvs/navaho.htm" title="astronautix.com" rel="nofollow">not the first to build</a> [astronautix.com], by a good 50 years.</p></div><p>This is the first "solid fueled" Supersonic "Maneuverable" Cruise Missile.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Possibly first to deploy , but not the first to build [ astronautix.com ] , by a good 50 years.This is the first " solid fueled " Supersonic " Maneuverable " Cruise Missile .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Possibly first to deploy, but not the first to build [astronautix.com], by a good 50 years.This is the first "solid fueled" Supersonic "Maneuverable" Cruise Missile.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559978</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560586</id>
	<title>Bah</title>
	<author>SoVeryTired</author>
	<datestamp>1269168780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bah. Wake me up when they have a maneuverable superluminal cruise missile.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bah .
Wake me up when they have a maneuverable superluminal cruise missile .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bah.
Wake me up when they have a maneuverable superluminal cruise missile.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560828</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>Mike Rice</author>
	<datestamp>1269170460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So my question is 'Redundant'?</p><p>How can it be redundant... there is no prior discussion?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So my question is 'Redundant ' ? How can it be redundant... there is no prior discussion ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So my question is 'Redundant'?How can it be redundant... there is no prior discussion?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560380</id>
	<title>Sir we have superman on radar!</title>
	<author>garompeta</author>
	<datestamp>1269167340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"What?, it must be a supersonic missile idiot!"
"Improbable sir, this one is curving and making acrobatics on the screen, actually I think it is trying to spell something"
"What does it say?"
"Catch me sucker!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" What ? , it must be a supersonic missile idiot !
" " Improbable sir , this one is curving and making acrobatics on the screen , actually I think it is trying to spell something " " What does it say ?
" " Catch me sucker !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"What?, it must be a supersonic missile idiot!
"
"Improbable sir, this one is curving and making acrobatics on the screen, actually I think it is trying to spell something"
"What does it say?
"
"Catch me sucker!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560646</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>ls671</author>
	<datestamp>1269169140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; The first?</p><p>Yep, title is confusing, I assume it is "a first" for India. I believe the first supersonic missile was the German V2 used in WW 2. It had a 5 400 km/h maximum speed. Granted, it wasn't much precise although...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; The first ? Yep , title is confusing , I assume it is " a first " for India .
I believe the first supersonic missile was the German V2 used in WW 2 .
It had a 5 400 km/h maximum speed .
Granted , it was n't much precise although.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; The first?Yep, title is confusing, I assume it is "a first" for India.
I believe the first supersonic missile was the German V2 used in WW 2.
It had a 5 400 km/h maximum speed.
Granted, it wasn't much precise although...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561248</id>
	<title>Re:"in its inventory"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269173160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Gosh, I sure hope they don't have to use it...</p><p>India, the Barney Fife of nations.</p></div><p>Sure. But only you can be expected to know that, being such an honorable descendant of Silas Lynch.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gosh , I sure hope they do n't have to use it...India , the Barney Fife of nations.Sure .
But only you can be expected to know that , being such an honorable descendant of Silas Lynch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gosh, I sure hope they don't have to use it...India, the Barney Fife of nations.Sure.
But only you can be expected to know that, being such an honorable descendant of Silas Lynch.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561028</id>
	<title>It's the unrecognized irony that kills you...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269171660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is ironic that the technology that goes into such a missile, from the computers and materials to the social networks that plan and test such things could instead bring abundance to everyone in the world.  Yet people still build such things from a scarcity-based mindset, not recognizing the total irony. The tools of abundance all around us now (robotics, computers, networks, biotech, chemistry, nanontech, nuclear technology, and so on) are so powerful -- we will destroy ourselves if we use them from a scarcity mindset. If used from an abundance mindset, we could instead make the world into a much happier place.</p><p>As Albert Einstein said, "The release of atom power has changed everything except our way of thinking...the solution to this problem lies in the heart of mankind."</p><p>We need to change our hearts towards providing abundance for all, before we all die of the unrecognized irony.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is ironic that the technology that goes into such a missile , from the computers and materials to the social networks that plan and test such things could instead bring abundance to everyone in the world .
Yet people still build such things from a scarcity-based mindset , not recognizing the total irony .
The tools of abundance all around us now ( robotics , computers , networks , biotech , chemistry , nanontech , nuclear technology , and so on ) are so powerful -- we will destroy ourselves if we use them from a scarcity mindset .
If used from an abundance mindset , we could instead make the world into a much happier place.As Albert Einstein said , " The release of atom power has changed everything except our way of thinking...the solution to this problem lies in the heart of mankind .
" We need to change our hearts towards providing abundance for all , before we all die of the unrecognized irony .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is ironic that the technology that goes into such a missile, from the computers and materials to the social networks that plan and test such things could instead bring abundance to everyone in the world.
Yet people still build such things from a scarcity-based mindset, not recognizing the total irony.
The tools of abundance all around us now (robotics, computers, networks, biotech, chemistry, nanontech, nuclear technology, and so on) are so powerful -- we will destroy ourselves if we use them from a scarcity mindset.
If used from an abundance mindset, we could instead make the world into a much happier place.As Albert Einstein said, "The release of atom power has changed everything except our way of thinking...the solution to this problem lies in the heart of mankind.
"We need to change our hearts towards providing abundance for all, before we all die of the unrecognized irony.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559928</id>
	<title>And Only?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269164460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And Only?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And Only ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And Only?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31564864</id>
	<title>WE DON'T CARE !</title>
	<author>yvesdandoy</author>
	<datestamp>1269255120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>BAN THAT KIND OF "NEWS" !!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>BAN THAT KIND OF " NEWS " ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BAN THAT KIND OF "NEWS" !!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560402</id>
	<title>Cruise Missile?</title>
	<author>Comatose51</author>
	<datestamp>1269167460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't this just a really fast surface to surface missile?  The operational range is 1/10 of a Tomahawk.  How is this any different from a short range ballistics missile, other than the trajectory?  I don't mean to criticize an impressive achievement but I foresee it being very different in use from something like a Tomahawk.  A Tomahawk can be fired from a huge standoff range and hit its target.  With this missile, the attacker has to get relatively close to its target, thus making it vulnerable to defenses.  A big part of the value of a cruise missile is that the attacker can stay relatively safe.  I think this weapon is much more defensive in nature and this is perhaps a reflection of India's strategic outlook.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this just a really fast surface to surface missile ?
The operational range is 1/10 of a Tomahawk .
How is this any different from a short range ballistics missile , other than the trajectory ?
I do n't mean to criticize an impressive achievement but I foresee it being very different in use from something like a Tomahawk .
A Tomahawk can be fired from a huge standoff range and hit its target .
With this missile , the attacker has to get relatively close to its target , thus making it vulnerable to defenses .
A big part of the value of a cruise missile is that the attacker can stay relatively safe .
I think this weapon is much more defensive in nature and this is perhaps a reflection of India 's strategic outlook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this just a really fast surface to surface missile?
The operational range is 1/10 of a Tomahawk.
How is this any different from a short range ballistics missile, other than the trajectory?
I don't mean to criticize an impressive achievement but I foresee it being very different in use from something like a Tomahawk.
A Tomahawk can be fired from a huge standoff range and hit its target.
With this missile, the attacker has to get relatively close to its target, thus making it vulnerable to defenses.
A big part of the value of a cruise missile is that the attacker can stay relatively safe.
I think this weapon is much more defensive in nature and this is perhaps a reflection of India's strategic outlook.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561378</id>
	<title>Re:Not about Pakistan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269174840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The US Navy is apparently upgrading its cruise missile defences on its ships, <b>replacing the Phalanx gun-based system with a missile-based version</b>, because of missiles like the BrahMos.</p></div><p>1. The Phalanx is a secondary line of defense against [everything]. The primary defense for cruise missiles is missile based.<br>2. There is a missile system being <i>tested</i> to run alongside the Phalanx system (SeaRAM), but not to supplant it.</p><p>Maybe you could give us a bit more information to explain what you're talking about</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The US Navy is apparently upgrading its cruise missile defences on its ships , replacing the Phalanx gun-based system with a missile-based version , because of missiles like the BrahMos.1 .
The Phalanx is a secondary line of defense against [ everything ] .
The primary defense for cruise missiles is missile based.2 .
There is a missile system being tested to run alongside the Phalanx system ( SeaRAM ) , but not to supplant it.Maybe you could give us a bit more information to explain what you 're talking about</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The US Navy is apparently upgrading its cruise missile defences on its ships, replacing the Phalanx gun-based system with a missile-based version, because of missiles like the BrahMos.1.
The Phalanx is a secondary line of defense against [everything].
The primary defense for cruise missiles is missile based.2.
There is a missile system being tested to run alongside the Phalanx system (SeaRAM), but not to supplant it.Maybe you could give us a bit more information to explain what you're talking about
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561150</id>
	<title>Re:Bad for Pakistan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269172440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh pakistan has enough ways to deliver the nuke - US has been actively selling them F16s for quite some time.</p><p>Pakistan is not exactly a worry for India on conventional warfare... only in asymmetrical warfare with terror outfits (again terror outfits indirectly supported by the US as recently as 2007). US generally feels that terrorism is only things that go against US... so.... we indians were screwed. So sympathy for 9/11 is understandably pretty low in India.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh pakistan has enough ways to deliver the nuke - US has been actively selling them F16s for quite some time.Pakistan is not exactly a worry for India on conventional warfare... only in asymmetrical warfare with terror outfits ( again terror outfits indirectly supported by the US as recently as 2007 ) .
US generally feels that terrorism is only things that go against US... so.... we indians were screwed .
So sympathy for 9/11 is understandably pretty low in India .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh pakistan has enough ways to deliver the nuke - US has been actively selling them F16s for quite some time.Pakistan is not exactly a worry for India on conventional warfare... only in asymmetrical warfare with terror outfits (again terror outfits indirectly supported by the US as recently as 2007).
US generally feels that terrorism is only things that go against US... so.... we indians were screwed.
So sympathy for 9/11 is understandably pretty low in India.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561018</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269171600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>&gt; The first?</p><p> I believe the first supersonic missile was the German V2 used in WW 2. It had a 5 400 km/h maximum speed. </p></div><p>V2 wasn't a cruise or maneuverable missile.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; The first ?
I believe the first supersonic missile was the German V2 used in WW 2 .
It had a 5 400 km/h maximum speed .
V2 was n't a cruise or maneuverable missile .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; The first?
I believe the first supersonic missile was the German V2 used in WW 2.
It had a 5 400 km/h maximum speed.
V2 wasn't a cruise or maneuverable missile.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560646</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31564444</id>
	<title>Re:Really!?</title>
	<author>DeaconRed</author>
	<datestamp>1269290520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, they were deployed. I saw AGM-28 Hound Dogs hanging under the wings of BUFFs at Wurtsmith AFB back in the early sixties. Check out <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-28\_Hound\_Dog" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-28\_Hound\_Dog</a> [wikipedia.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , they were deployed .
I saw AGM-28 Hound Dogs hanging under the wings of BUFFs at Wurtsmith AFB back in the early sixties .
Check out http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-28 \ _Hound \ _Dog [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, they were deployed.
I saw AGM-28 Hound Dogs hanging under the wings of BUFFs at Wurtsmith AFB back in the early sixties.
Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-28\_Hound\_Dog [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561904</id>
	<title>Re:Really? - NO</title>
	<author>TCPhotography</author>
	<datestamp>1269178680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The first?</p></div><p>This is incorrect.  In the late 1950's the US developed the 'Hound Dog' AGM-28 (GAM-77/GAM-77A under the designation system at the time).  In Service in 1960, the Hound Dog was unique in that the turbojet that it carried could be run off of the carrying B-52's fuel, practically allowing the use of the engines on Both Hound Dogs during takeoff.  While not as fast as BrahMos, the Hound Dog could fly Three and a half times further, and could carry a nuclear weapon (no doubt in my mind that the Indias have a nuclear BrahMos in the works).</p><p>Source <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-28\_Hound\_Dog" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-28\_Hound\_Dog</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The first ? This is incorrect .
In the late 1950 's the US developed the 'Hound Dog ' AGM-28 ( GAM-77/GAM-77A under the designation system at the time ) .
In Service in 1960 , the Hound Dog was unique in that the turbojet that it carried could be run off of the carrying B-52 's fuel , practically allowing the use of the engines on Both Hound Dogs during takeoff .
While not as fast as BrahMos , the Hound Dog could fly Three and a half times further , and could carry a nuclear weapon ( no doubt in my mind that the Indias have a nuclear BrahMos in the works ) .Source http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-28 \ _Hound \ _Dog [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first?This is incorrect.
In the late 1950's the US developed the 'Hound Dog' AGM-28 (GAM-77/GAM-77A under the designation system at the time).
In Service in 1960, the Hound Dog was unique in that the turbojet that it carried could be run off of the carrying B-52's fuel, practically allowing the use of the engines on Both Hound Dogs during takeoff.
While not as fast as BrahMos, the Hound Dog could fly Three and a half times further, and could carry a nuclear weapon (no doubt in my mind that the Indias have a nuclear BrahMos in the works).Source http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-28\_Hound\_Dog [wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560364</id>
	<title>Re:Headline wrong, as is the article</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269167220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm an aerospace engineer...in our jargon, a course correction compensates for drift, so we are talking about correcting for very low angular rates that come about because of gyro drift, winds aloft, etc.  The engineers who designed the P-500 for course correction likely used small angle approximations (cos(theta) = 1, sin(theta)=theta -- first term from a Taylor series expension) because the correction values for theta were very small.</p><p>A maneuver is a large deviation from the initial flight path, where theta (flight path angle deviation) is large enough that the first order Taylor series approximation does not work.  What this means is that your controller becomes highly nonlinear, and requires significantly greater amounts of computing power.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm an aerospace engineer...in our jargon , a course correction compensates for drift , so we are talking about correcting for very low angular rates that come about because of gyro drift , winds aloft , etc .
The engineers who designed the P-500 for course correction likely used small angle approximations ( cos ( theta ) = 1 , sin ( theta ) = theta -- first term from a Taylor series expension ) because the correction values for theta were very small.A maneuver is a large deviation from the initial flight path , where theta ( flight path angle deviation ) is large enough that the first order Taylor series approximation does not work .
What this means is that your controller becomes highly nonlinear , and requires significantly greater amounts of computing power .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm an aerospace engineer...in our jargon, a course correction compensates for drift, so we are talking about correcting for very low angular rates that come about because of gyro drift, winds aloft, etc.
The engineers who designed the P-500 for course correction likely used small angle approximations (cos(theta) = 1, sin(theta)=theta -- first term from a Taylor series expension) because the correction values for theta were very small.A maneuver is a large deviation from the initial flight path, where theta (flight path angle deviation) is large enough that the first order Taylor series approximation does not work.
What this means is that your controller becomes highly nonlinear, and requires significantly greater amounts of computing power.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561404</id>
	<title>Re:They're not the first...</title>
	<author>CrashandDie</author>
	<datestamp>1269175020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Carpet- and Thigh-burn often go supersonic as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Carpet- and Thigh-burn often go supersonic as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Carpet- and Thigh-burn often go supersonic as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560504</id>
	<title>Re:Bad for Pakistan</title>
	<author>vlm</author>
	<datestamp>1269168240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nawww, the real "first strike weapon from Hell." is a 20 foot standard shipping container, either in the harbor or hauled around the country on a flatbed semi trailer.  Heck, a really big RV, or a cargo jet, would work too.  The fact that no one has done this to the USA yet, is basically proof that at least either the motive or the capability doesn't exist.</p><p>Now a SS cruise missile, that would be an interesting tactical weapon if you're losing a hot conventional war aka surprise invasion, or a great "return fire" response to the shipping container scenario.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nawww , the real " first strike weapon from Hell .
" is a 20 foot standard shipping container , either in the harbor or hauled around the country on a flatbed semi trailer .
Heck , a really big RV , or a cargo jet , would work too .
The fact that no one has done this to the USA yet , is basically proof that at least either the motive or the capability does n't exist.Now a SS cruise missile , that would be an interesting tactical weapon if you 're losing a hot conventional war aka surprise invasion , or a great " return fire " response to the shipping container scenario .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nawww, the real "first strike weapon from Hell.
" is a 20 foot standard shipping container, either in the harbor or hauled around the country on a flatbed semi trailer.
Heck, a really big RV, or a cargo jet, would work too.
The fact that no one has done this to the USA yet, is basically proof that at least either the motive or the capability doesn't exist.Now a SS cruise missile, that would be an interesting tactical weapon if you're losing a hot conventional war aka surprise invasion, or a great "return fire" response to the shipping container scenario.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560028</id>
	<title>Super-sonic</title>
	<author>SmallFurryCreature</author>
	<datestamp>1269165060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not ones that go faster then the speed of sound. It ain't all that hard, it is in the bloody title.
</p><p>But don't worry. The US still leads in idiots I see.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not ones that go faster then the speed of sound .
It ai n't all that hard , it is in the bloody title .
But do n't worry .
The US still leads in idiots I see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not ones that go faster then the speed of sound.
It ain't all that hard, it is in the bloody title.
But don't worry.
The US still leads in idiots I see.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31562034</id>
	<title>NOt the first, by a lot</title>
	<author>Ancient\_Hacker</author>
	<datestamp>1269179520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ahem, what about the cruise missiles the USA built in the 1950's?</p><p>
&nbsp; Over a billion big fat 1950's dollars spent on those.</p><p>
&nbsp; Just off the top of my head, the Hound Dog, the Snark, The Navaho, the BOMARC, the Boojum, the Triton, and the Mace.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahem , what about the cruise missiles the USA built in the 1950 's ?
  Over a billion big fat 1950 's dollars spent on those .
  Just off the top of my head , the Hound Dog , the Snark , The Navaho , the BOMARC , the Boojum , the Triton , and the Mace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahem, what about the cruise missiles the USA built in the 1950's?
  Over a billion big fat 1950's dollars spent on those.
  Just off the top of my head, the Hound Dog, the Snark, The Navaho, the BOMARC, the Boojum, the Triton, and the Mace.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560444</id>
	<title>Re:Bad for Pakistan</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1269167700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe India, China, and Pakistan will all bankrupt themselves with an arms race.  India has help from Russia, a country with some experience in this area...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe India , China , and Pakistan will all bankrupt themselves with an arms race .
India has help from Russia , a country with some experience in this area.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe India, China, and Pakistan will all bankrupt themselves with an arms race.
India has help from Russia, a country with some experience in this area...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563148</id>
	<title>Re:Cruise Missile?</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1269188220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Isn't this just a really fast surface to surface missile?</p></div></blockquote><p>Yes.  But so what?<br>
&nbsp; </p><blockquote><div><p>The operational range is 1/10 of a Tomahawk.</p></div></blockquote><p>The range is also on the same order as that of the AGM-84 Harpoon.  Nobody calls Harpoon 'just a defensive weapon'.<br>
&nbsp; </p><blockquote><div><p>With this missile, the attacker has to get relatively close to its target</p></div></blockquote><p>BrahMos has a range of 290km (180mi), that's not 'relatively close' in any reasonable meaning of the words.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this just a really fast surface to surface missile ? Yes .
But so what ?
  The operational range is 1/10 of a Tomahawk.The range is also on the same order as that of the AGM-84 Harpoon .
Nobody calls Harpoon 'just a defensive weapon' .
  With this missile , the attacker has to get relatively close to its targetBrahMos has a range of 290km ( 180mi ) , that 's not 'relatively close ' in any reasonable meaning of the words .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this just a really fast surface to surface missile?Yes.
But so what?
  The operational range is 1/10 of a Tomahawk.The range is also on the same order as that of the AGM-84 Harpoon.
Nobody calls Harpoon 'just a defensive weapon'.
  With this missile, the attacker has to get relatively close to its targetBrahMos has a range of 290km (180mi), that's not 'relatively close' in any reasonable meaning of the words.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560054</id>
	<title>"in its inventory"</title>
	<author>pem</author>
	<datestamp>1269165180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Gosh, I sure hope they don't have to use it...
<p>
India, the Barney Fife of nations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gosh , I sure hope they do n't have to use it.. . India , the Barney Fife of nations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gosh, I sure hope they don't have to use it...

India, the Barney Fife of nations.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561392</id>
	<title>Re:Headline wrong, as is the article</title>
	<author>Kugrian</author>
	<datestamp>1269174960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So many levels of fail in this submission</p></div></blockquote><p>It's not exactly rocket science, is it?</p><p>Sorry.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So many levels of fail in this submissionIt 's not exactly rocket science , is it ? Sorry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So many levels of fail in this submissionIt's not exactly rocket science, is it?Sorry.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561502</id>
	<title>Re:Great -</title>
	<author>tsotha</author>
	<datestamp>1269175800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is nonsensical.  For one thing, The Chinese already have ballistic nuclear missiles.  If they actually decided to uncork the nukes there's no need to use something like this.  Ballistic missiles are much harder to stop than cruise missiles.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is nonsensical .
For one thing , The Chinese already have ballistic nuclear missiles .
If they actually decided to uncork the nukes there 's no need to use something like this .
Ballistic missiles are much harder to stop than cruise missiles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is nonsensical.
For one thing, The Chinese already have ballistic nuclear missiles.
If they actually decided to uncork the nukes there's no need to use something like this.
Ballistic missiles are much harder to stop than cruise missiles.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31562832</id>
	<title>Re:Great -</title>
	<author>WindBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1269185520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course, it is amazing how fast lasers and mach 10 rail guns operate compared to these SUPER SUPER SLOW cruise missiles. Yes, compared to the rail gun, or the speed of light, anything that China can throw against BIG CARRIERS will within another 5 years will  be protected by both lasers and railguns. And the railgun operates up to 500 km, and the laser at over 1000 km. <br> <br>
Finally, I would not worry about China buying one. They will have stolen the tech by now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , it is amazing how fast lasers and mach 10 rail guns operate compared to these SUPER SUPER SLOW cruise missiles .
Yes , compared to the rail gun , or the speed of light , anything that China can throw against BIG CARRIERS will within another 5 years will be protected by both lasers and railguns .
And the railgun operates up to 500 km , and the laser at over 1000 km .
Finally , I would not worry about China buying one .
They will have stolen the tech by now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, it is amazing how fast lasers and mach 10 rail guns operate compared to these SUPER SUPER SLOW cruise missiles.
Yes, compared to the rail gun, or the speed of light, anything that China can throw against BIG CARRIERS will within another 5 years will  be protected by both lasers and railguns.
And the railgun operates up to 500 km, and the laser at over 1000 km.
Finally, I would not worry about China buying one.
They will have stolen the tech by now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561400</id>
	<title>Nice missile</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269175020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nice missile, brah!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice missile , brah !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice missile, brah!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560080</id>
	<title>As we say in warcraft...</title>
	<author>St.Creed</author>
	<datestamp>1269165420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>screenshot or it didn't happen</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>screenshot or it did n't happen</tokentext>
<sentencetext>screenshot or it didn't happen</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31570570</id>
	<title>Re:Really!?</title>
	<author>IndustrialComplex</author>
	<datestamp>1269278940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Most others aren't, because it is not obvious what advantage supersonic cruise missiles have over ballistic ones.</i></p><p>Don't you mean what advantage supersonic cruise missiles have over subsonic cruise missles?  Or did you mean what advantage supersonic cruise missiles have over short to medium range ballistic missiles?</p><p>Were you just comparing the advantages between speeds, or between guidance/control systems?  While not quite apples and oranges, it certainly seems like you are comparing apples and pears at least.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most others are n't , because it is not obvious what advantage supersonic cruise missiles have over ballistic ones.Do n't you mean what advantage supersonic cruise missiles have over subsonic cruise missles ?
Or did you mean what advantage supersonic cruise missiles have over short to medium range ballistic missiles ? Were you just comparing the advantages between speeds , or between guidance/control systems ?
While not quite apples and oranges , it certainly seems like you are comparing apples and pears at least .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most others aren't, because it is not obvious what advantage supersonic cruise missiles have over ballistic ones.Don't you mean what advantage supersonic cruise missiles have over subsonic cruise missles?
Or did you mean what advantage supersonic cruise missiles have over short to medium range ballistic missiles?Were you just comparing the advantages between speeds, or between guidance/control systems?
While not quite apples and oranges, it certainly seems like you are comparing apples and pears at least.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560010</id>
	<title>Indian jokes</title>
	<author>deodiaus2</author>
	<datestamp>1269164940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess we can outsource our military development to India.   Hitler's German was prohibited from making weapons prior to WWII (part of the WW1 peace treaty), so he outsourced the industry to Russia, and used the weapons against it.  Obviously, after WWII got started, Germany developed its own military industry.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess we can outsource our military development to India .
Hitler 's German was prohibited from making weapons prior to WWII ( part of the WW1 peace treaty ) , so he outsourced the industry to Russia , and used the weapons against it .
Obviously , after WWII got started , Germany developed its own military industry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess we can outsource our military development to India.
Hitler's German was prohibited from making weapons prior to WWII (part of the WW1 peace treaty), so he outsourced the industry to Russia, and used the weapons against it.
Obviously, after WWII got started, Germany developed its own military industry.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31564616</id>
	<title>Re:Bad for Pakistan</title>
	<author>chthon</author>
	<datestamp>1269250680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think this weapon is more intended for usage against naval targets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this weapon is more intended for usage against naval targets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this weapon is more intended for usage against naval targets.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560400</id>
	<title>9/11</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269167400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Didn't the 9/11 hijackers use a supersonic cruise missile?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't the 9/11 hijackers use a supersonic cruise missile ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't the 9/11 hijackers use a supersonic cruise missile?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31562790</id>
	<title>Commerative song by The Runaways</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269185100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cu-cu-cu-cu-cu-cu-cu-cu-CURRY BOMB!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cu-cu-cu-cu-cu-cu-cu-cu-CURRY BOMB !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cu-cu-cu-cu-cu-cu-cu-cu-CURRY BOMB!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561002</id>
	<title>Re:Really!?</title>
	<author>aeson25</author>
	<datestamp>1269171420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was also wondering about this. How exactly are they powering it with a nuclear source?  Nuclear power comes in two forms, (as far as I know).  A) Steam B) Peltier Seebeck effect (often used in space probes).  Neither of which is useful here.

Though I did hear of theoretical spacecraft that used timed mini nuclear explosions behind the ship to propel it forward, but by mini, it was still on a much larger scale than an average missile.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was also wondering about this .
How exactly are they powering it with a nuclear source ?
Nuclear power comes in two forms , ( as far as I know ) .
A ) Steam B ) Peltier Seebeck effect ( often used in space probes ) .
Neither of which is useful here .
Though I did hear of theoretical spacecraft that used timed mini nuclear explosions behind the ship to propel it forward , but by mini , it was still on a much larger scale than an average missile .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was also wondering about this.
How exactly are they powering it with a nuclear source?
Nuclear power comes in two forms, (as far as I know).
A) Steam B) Peltier Seebeck effect (often used in space probes).
Neither of which is useful here.
Though I did hear of theoretical spacecraft that used timed mini nuclear explosions behind the ship to propel it forward, but by mini, it was still on a much larger scale than an average missile.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31565216</id>
	<title>How can India be the first in a joint project</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269260640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It says that the missile has been developed with Russia. If that is correct then the first supersonic cruise missile was developed by India &amp; Russia.</p><p>Credit where it is due.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It says that the missile has been developed with Russia .
If that is correct then the first supersonic cruise missile was developed by India &amp; Russia.Credit where it is due .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It says that the missile has been developed with Russia.
If that is correct then the first supersonic cruise missile was developed by India &amp; Russia.Credit where it is due.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31565960</id>
	<title>Supercruise</title>
	<author>Macka</author>
	<datestamp>1269266220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess you have never heard of the term <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercruise" title="wikipedia.org">supercruise</a> [wikipedia.org] then.  If it's ok for airplanes to cruise at supersonic speeds, then it's also ok for a cruise missile.  And <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=BrahMos+supersonic+cruise+missile" title="google.co.uk">general consensus</a> [google.co.uk] on the net does not agree with you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess you have never heard of the term supercruise [ wikipedia.org ] then .
If it 's ok for airplanes to cruise at supersonic speeds , then it 's also ok for a cruise missile .
And general consensus [ google.co.uk ] on the net does not agree with you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess you have never heard of the term supercruise [wikipedia.org] then.
If it's ok for airplanes to cruise at supersonic speeds, then it's also ok for a cruise missile.
And general consensus [google.co.uk] on the net does not agree with you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560498</id>
	<title>Re:C'mon...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269168180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Can we PLEASE start spending all this cash on things that don't blow up?</p></div><p>Seems awfully inefficient to me.  After all, it's a lot easier to kill people with stuff that <i>does</i> blow up.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we PLEASE start spending all this cash on things that do n't blow up ? Seems awfully inefficient to me .
After all , it 's a lot easier to kill people with stuff that does blow up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we PLEASE start spending all this cash on things that don't blow up?Seems awfully inefficient to me.
After all, it's a lot easier to kill people with stuff that does blow up.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560012</id>
	<title>Re:Really!?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269164940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, but all previous ones have been subsonic, mostly because they're used against stationary or very slow-moving targets, where being supersonic isn't much of an advantage, but substantially increases costs in R&amp;D and manufacturing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but all previous ones have been subsonic , mostly because they 're used against stationary or very slow-moving targets , where being supersonic is n't much of an advantage , but substantially increases costs in R&amp;D and manufacturing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but all previous ones have been subsonic, mostly because they're used against stationary or very slow-moving targets, where being supersonic isn't much of an advantage, but substantially increases costs in R&amp;D and manufacturing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560376</id>
	<title>Re:Really!?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269167280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...BTW in the sixties the USA developed but never tested or deployed a nuclear powered supersonic cruise missile.</p></div><p>Got any sources on this? I've heard of missiles with nuclear payloads, but not where their power source is nuclear...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...BTW in the sixties the USA developed but never tested or deployed a nuclear powered supersonic cruise missile.Got any sources on this ?
I 've heard of missiles with nuclear payloads , but not where their power source is nuclear.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...BTW in the sixties the USA developed but never tested or deployed a nuclear powered supersonic cruise missile.Got any sources on this?
I've heard of missiles with nuclear payloads, but not where their power source is nuclear...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563022</id>
	<title>Not a First - Re-Emerging Trend</title>
	<author>knapper\_tech</author>
	<datestamp>1269187200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Russia built a series of supersonic anti-ship missiles with ranges in the cruise category.  They were mostly fit aboard submarines and destroyers and designed for saturation attacks, which our missile defense systems were poorly equipped to deal with.<br> <br>Using modern technology (higher temperature alloys, ceramic composites, and CFD optimization) it would be easily possible to build a cruise missile in the 1000nm range.  In fact, because subsonic cruisers have to combat with launcher dimensions, their form factors are ill-suited for subsonic drag reduction and supersonic missiles might have an aerodynamic advantage. <br> <br>ATK is currently developing a hypersonic cruise missile for the 800km range, which is an important gap filler between what artillery, short-range missiles, and ballistic missiles can hit quickly.  This range is currently filled by subsonic cruise-missiles which can take over an hour to reach the target.  Time-critical-strike it's called.<br> <br>The issue with a supersonic cruise missile is that it needs even more than a subsonic cruiser to fly at high altitude in order to achieve satisfactory range.  Aerodynamic heating is difficult, perhaps limiting at low altitudes for more than a short terminal phase.  Flying at high altitude means they are easier to detect (not that look-down-shoot-down isn't standard, but ship-based phased-array radars won't be looking down) albeit harder to intercept due to their higher velocity.<br> <br>What's really scary are the Chinese developed <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-ship\_ballistic\_missile" title="wikipedia.org">anti-ship ballistic missiles</a> [wikipedia.org].  Stealthy re-entry vehicles that can perform course changes.  This is an interception nightmare and likely driving the US Navy ballistic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Russia built a series of supersonic anti-ship missiles with ranges in the cruise category .
They were mostly fit aboard submarines and destroyers and designed for saturation attacks , which our missile defense systems were poorly equipped to deal with .
Using modern technology ( higher temperature alloys , ceramic composites , and CFD optimization ) it would be easily possible to build a cruise missile in the 1000nm range .
In fact , because subsonic cruisers have to combat with launcher dimensions , their form factors are ill-suited for subsonic drag reduction and supersonic missiles might have an aerodynamic advantage .
ATK is currently developing a hypersonic cruise missile for the 800km range , which is an important gap filler between what artillery , short-range missiles , and ballistic missiles can hit quickly .
This range is currently filled by subsonic cruise-missiles which can take over an hour to reach the target .
Time-critical-strike it 's called .
The issue with a supersonic cruise missile is that it needs even more than a subsonic cruiser to fly at high altitude in order to achieve satisfactory range .
Aerodynamic heating is difficult , perhaps limiting at low altitudes for more than a short terminal phase .
Flying at high altitude means they are easier to detect ( not that look-down-shoot-down is n't standard , but ship-based phased-array radars wo n't be looking down ) albeit harder to intercept due to their higher velocity .
What 's really scary are the Chinese developed anti-ship ballistic missiles [ wikipedia.org ] .
Stealthy re-entry vehicles that can perform course changes .
This is an interception nightmare and likely driving the US Navy ballistic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Russia built a series of supersonic anti-ship missiles with ranges in the cruise category.
They were mostly fit aboard submarines and destroyers and designed for saturation attacks, which our missile defense systems were poorly equipped to deal with.
Using modern technology (higher temperature alloys, ceramic composites, and CFD optimization) it would be easily possible to build a cruise missile in the 1000nm range.
In fact, because subsonic cruisers have to combat with launcher dimensions, their form factors are ill-suited for subsonic drag reduction and supersonic missiles might have an aerodynamic advantage.
ATK is currently developing a hypersonic cruise missile for the 800km range, which is an important gap filler between what artillery, short-range missiles, and ballistic missiles can hit quickly.
This range is currently filled by subsonic cruise-missiles which can take over an hour to reach the target.
Time-critical-strike it's called.
The issue with a supersonic cruise missile is that it needs even more than a subsonic cruiser to fly at high altitude in order to achieve satisfactory range.
Aerodynamic heating is difficult, perhaps limiting at low altitudes for more than a short terminal phase.
Flying at high altitude means they are easier to detect (not that look-down-shoot-down isn't standard, but ship-based phased-array radars won't be looking down) albeit harder to intercept due to their higher velocity.
What's really scary are the Chinese developed anti-ship ballistic missiles [wikipedia.org].
Stealthy re-entry vehicles that can perform course changes.
This is an interception nightmare and likely driving the US Navy ballistic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560474</id>
	<title>Re:Headline wrong, as is the article</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269167940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and India's only has a 200kg payload and 290km range.
<br> <br>
I've never seen an article fail so bad, and it makes India look like a joke in the process.</htmltext>
<tokenext>and India 's only has a 200kg payload and 290km range .
I 've never seen an article fail so bad , and it makes India look like a joke in the process .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and India's only has a 200kg payload and 290km range.
I've never seen an article fail so bad, and it makes India look like a joke in the process.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560026</id>
	<title>Headline wrong, as is the article</title>
	<author>category\_five</author>
	<datestamp>1269165000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The headline says, "India First To Build a Supersonic Cruise Missile". In order to even accurately reflect the article, it should read, "India First To Build a <b>manoeuvrable </b>Supersonic Cruise Missile". But even so, the article is wrong;<br>
<br>
from wikipedia, P-500 Bazalt<br>
<br>
The P-500 Bazalt (Russian: -500 ; English: basalt) is a liquid-fueled, rocket powered, <b>supersonic</b> cruise missile used by the Soviet and Russian navies. Developed by OKB-52 MAP (later NPO Mashinostroyeniye), its GRAU designation is 4K80[1]. Its NATO reporting name is SS-N-12 Sandbox. <b>It entered service in 1973 </b> to replace the SS-N-3 Shaddock. The P-500 Bazalt had a 550 km range and a payload of 1,000 kg, which allows it to carry a 350 kT nuclear or a 950 kg semi-armor-piercing high explosive warhead (currently only the conventional version remains in service). The P-500 Bazalt uses active radar homing for terminal guidance, and <b>can receive mid-course corrections</b> by the Tupolev Tu-95D, the Kamov Ka-25B and the Kamov Ka-27B.<br>
<br>
So many levels of fail in this submission</htmltext>
<tokenext>The headline says , " India First To Build a Supersonic Cruise Missile " .
In order to even accurately reflect the article , it should read , " India First To Build a manoeuvrable Supersonic Cruise Missile " .
But even so , the article is wrong ; from wikipedia , P-500 Bazalt The P-500 Bazalt ( Russian : -500 ; English : basalt ) is a liquid-fueled , rocket powered , supersonic cruise missile used by the Soviet and Russian navies .
Developed by OKB-52 MAP ( later NPO Mashinostroyeniye ) , its GRAU designation is 4K80 [ 1 ] .
Its NATO reporting name is SS-N-12 Sandbox .
It entered service in 1973 to replace the SS-N-3 Shaddock .
The P-500 Bazalt had a 550 km range and a payload of 1,000 kg , which allows it to carry a 350 kT nuclear or a 950 kg semi-armor-piercing high explosive warhead ( currently only the conventional version remains in service ) .
The P-500 Bazalt uses active radar homing for terminal guidance , and can receive mid-course corrections by the Tupolev Tu-95D , the Kamov Ka-25B and the Kamov Ka-27B .
So many levels of fail in this submission</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The headline says, "India First To Build a Supersonic Cruise Missile".
In order to even accurately reflect the article, it should read, "India First To Build a manoeuvrable Supersonic Cruise Missile".
But even so, the article is wrong;

from wikipedia, P-500 Bazalt

The P-500 Bazalt (Russian: -500 ; English: basalt) is a liquid-fueled, rocket powered, supersonic cruise missile used by the Soviet and Russian navies.
Developed by OKB-52 MAP (later NPO Mashinostroyeniye), its GRAU designation is 4K80[1].
Its NATO reporting name is SS-N-12 Sandbox.
It entered service in 1973  to replace the SS-N-3 Shaddock.
The P-500 Bazalt had a 550 km range and a payload of 1,000 kg, which allows it to carry a 350 kT nuclear or a 950 kg semi-armor-piercing high explosive warhead (currently only the conventional version remains in service).
The P-500 Bazalt uses active radar homing for terminal guidance, and can receive mid-course corrections by the Tupolev Tu-95D, the Kamov Ka-25B and the Kamov Ka-27B.
So many levels of fail in this submission</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561080</id>
	<title>Cruise at supersonic speed?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269172020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The reason cruise missiles are called cruise missiles is because they are low speed missiles....which is also why they needed wings to help keep them aloft.</p><p>Therefore, this is not a cruise missile.</p><p>Now that we have eliminated that term from the name, let's have another look at the summary:  India builds maneuverable supersonic missile.   Yawn!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason cruise missiles are called cruise missiles is because they are low speed missiles....which is also why they needed wings to help keep them aloft.Therefore , this is not a cruise missile.Now that we have eliminated that term from the name , let 's have another look at the summary : India builds maneuverable supersonic missile .
Yawn !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason cruise missiles are called cruise missiles is because they are low speed missiles....which is also why they needed wings to help keep them aloft.Therefore, this is not a cruise missile.Now that we have eliminated that term from the name, let's have another look at the summary:  India builds maneuverable supersonic missile.
Yawn!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560326</id>
	<title>C'mon...</title>
	<author>Anachragnome</author>
	<datestamp>1269167040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>C'mon, folks.</p><p>Can we PLEASE start spending all this cash on things that don't blow up?</p><p>Seems burning paper currency wasn't fast enough, now we have refined methods of destroying funds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>C'mon , folks.Can we PLEASE start spending all this cash on things that do n't blow up ? Seems burning paper currency was n't fast enough , now we have refined methods of destroying funds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>C'mon, folks.Can we PLEASE start spending all this cash on things that don't blow up?Seems burning paper currency wasn't fast enough, now we have refined methods of destroying funds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561860</id>
	<title>The first...</title>
	<author>Samah</author>
	<datestamp>1269178320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...that we know of.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...that we know of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that we know of.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560526</id>
	<title>Re:Headline wrong, as is the article</title>
	<author>(arg!)Styopa</author>
	<datestamp>1269168420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, AFAIK the Bazalt is maneuverable only during its cruise phase, once it reaches the terminal guidance track and goes supersonic, it isn't really more than marginally guideable.</p><p>I'd guess that the Indian one is supersonic most of its range (thus the puny 300km) and will accept course guidance during supersonic flight.</p><p>So no, I'd guess that the title is only misleading, not grossly wrong as you imply.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , AFAIK the Bazalt is maneuverable only during its cruise phase , once it reaches the terminal guidance track and goes supersonic , it is n't really more than marginally guideable.I 'd guess that the Indian one is supersonic most of its range ( thus the puny 300km ) and will accept course guidance during supersonic flight.So no , I 'd guess that the title is only misleading , not grossly wrong as you imply .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, AFAIK the Bazalt is maneuverable only during its cruise phase, once it reaches the terminal guidance track and goes supersonic, it isn't really more than marginally guideable.I'd guess that the Indian one is supersonic most of its range (thus the puny 300km) and will accept course guidance during supersonic flight.So no, I'd guess that the title is only misleading, not grossly wrong as you imply.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31564038</id>
	<title>Re:Really!?</title>
	<author>gknoy</author>
	<datestamp>1269197700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear\_thermal\_rocket" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear\_thermal\_rocket</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>Apparently, Los Alamos did some research into it, and had four designs that they tested. Not all of them were flown, due to atmospheric pollution.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear \ _thermal \ _rocket [ wikipedia.org ] Apparently , Los Alamos did some research into it , and had four designs that they tested .
Not all of them were flown , due to atmospheric pollution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear\_thermal\_rocket [wikipedia.org]Apparently, Los Alamos did some research into it, and had four designs that they tested.
Not all of them were flown, due to atmospheric pollution.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31564246</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269200820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep, India collected all the Chaos Emeralds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep , India collected all the Chaos Emeralds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep, India collected all the Chaos Emeralds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560516</id>
	<title>no big deal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269168300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We have the first superkalafragilisticexpialidosious cruise missle in 3D!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We have the first superkalafragilisticexpialidosious cruise missle in 3D !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We have the first superkalafragilisticexpialidosious cruise missle in 3D!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561200</id>
	<title>Re:Cruise Missile?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269172800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most cruise missiles are designed to be really hard to detect once they've been launched (the Stark, for example, saw incoming Iraqi aircraft but didn't pick up the Exocet missiles they launched).  The Brahmos (and earlier versions like the Russian P-800 Onyx) have a different strategy - it's a lot easier to pick up on radar and IR, but you don't have a lot of time to knock it down.
</p><p>The advantage of a flat trajectory over ballistic is two-fold:  1) cruise missiles are easier to make than ballistic missiles.  Your problems with heat, guidance, and vibration are magnified in a ballistic trajectory.  And 2) cruise missiles tend to be much smaller.  A ballistic missile with the same size warhead is almost ten times as large.
</p><p>And yeah, the relatively short range is a big drawback.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most cruise missiles are designed to be really hard to detect once they 've been launched ( the Stark , for example , saw incoming Iraqi aircraft but did n't pick up the Exocet missiles they launched ) .
The Brahmos ( and earlier versions like the Russian P-800 Onyx ) have a different strategy - it 's a lot easier to pick up on radar and IR , but you do n't have a lot of time to knock it down .
The advantage of a flat trajectory over ballistic is two-fold : 1 ) cruise missiles are easier to make than ballistic missiles .
Your problems with heat , guidance , and vibration are magnified in a ballistic trajectory .
And 2 ) cruise missiles tend to be much smaller .
A ballistic missile with the same size warhead is almost ten times as large .
And yeah , the relatively short range is a big drawback .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most cruise missiles are designed to be really hard to detect once they've been launched (the Stark, for example, saw incoming Iraqi aircraft but didn't pick up the Exocet missiles they launched).
The Brahmos (and earlier versions like the Russian P-800 Onyx) have a different strategy - it's a lot easier to pick up on radar and IR, but you don't have a lot of time to knock it down.
The advantage of a flat trajectory over ballistic is two-fold:  1) cruise missiles are easier to make than ballistic missiles.
Your problems with heat, guidance, and vibration are magnified in a ballistic trajectory.
And 2) cruise missiles tend to be much smaller.
A ballistic missile with the same size warhead is almost ten times as large.
And yeah, the relatively short range is a big drawback.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560274</id>
	<title>Payload</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269166620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The missile will carry a primary warhead consisting of excess jinglys picked up from the nearest poopy streets. Upon detonation the hapless target is rendered uninhabitable for 500 years due to the pervasive stench of regurgitated curry and unwashed armpits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The missile will carry a primary warhead consisting of excess jinglys picked up from the nearest poopy streets .
Upon detonation the hapless target is rendered uninhabitable for 500 years due to the pervasive stench of regurgitated curry and unwashed armpits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The missile will carry a primary warhead consisting of excess jinglys picked up from the nearest poopy streets.
Upon detonation the hapless target is rendered uninhabitable for 500 years due to the pervasive stench of regurgitated curry and unwashed armpits.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560098</id>
	<title>Re:Really!?</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1269165540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This one is supersonic.  Most others aren't, because it is not obvious what advantage supersonic cruise missiles have over ballistic ones.</p><p>BTW in the sixties the USA developed but never tested or deployed a nuclear powered supersonic cruise missile.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This one is supersonic .
Most others are n't , because it is not obvious what advantage supersonic cruise missiles have over ballistic ones.BTW in the sixties the USA developed but never tested or deployed a nuclear powered supersonic cruise missile .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This one is supersonic.
Most others aren't, because it is not obvious what advantage supersonic cruise missiles have over ballistic ones.BTW in the sixties the USA developed but never tested or deployed a nuclear powered supersonic cruise missile.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563058</id>
	<title>the real story:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269187440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tom Cruise went to India. Watched gay Bollywood porn. His missile deployed at supersonic speed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tom Cruise went to India .
Watched gay Bollywood porn .
His missile deployed at supersonic speed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tom Cruise went to India.
Watched gay Bollywood porn.
His missile deployed at supersonic speed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560024</id>
	<title>They're not the first...</title>
	<author>Assmasher</author>
	<datestamp>1269165000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...Soviets had supersonic air to surface cruise missiles and surface to surface missiles.  It's where the Indian tech comes from.  Kitchen and Sunburn were the ones that spring to mind immediately.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...Soviets had supersonic air to surface cruise missiles and surface to surface missiles .
It 's where the Indian tech comes from .
Kitchen and Sunburn were the ones that spring to mind immediately .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Soviets had supersonic air to surface cruise missiles and surface to surface missiles.
It's where the Indian tech comes from.
Kitchen and Sunburn were the ones that spring to mind immediately.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560418</id>
	<title>Not about Pakistan</title>
	<author>Goonie</author>
	<datestamp>1269167520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Weapons like the BrahMos are primarily aimed at ships.  Yes, you could also use it as a precision-guided land attack cruise missile, but Pakistan's navy is small and almost irrelevant for conflict with India.</p><p>This weapon - and, indeed, much of India's military development - is about maintaining military competitiveness with China, and to some extent the ability to discourage the US from interfering if India conducts military operations in areas it regards as its sphere of influence.</p><p>The US Navy is apparently upgrading its cruise missile defences on its ships, replacing the Phalanx gun-based system with a missile-based version, because of missiles like the BrahMos.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Weapons like the BrahMos are primarily aimed at ships .
Yes , you could also use it as a precision-guided land attack cruise missile , but Pakistan 's navy is small and almost irrelevant for conflict with India.This weapon - and , indeed , much of India 's military development - is about maintaining military competitiveness with China , and to some extent the ability to discourage the US from interfering if India conducts military operations in areas it regards as its sphere of influence.The US Navy is apparently upgrading its cruise missile defences on its ships , replacing the Phalanx gun-based system with a missile-based version , because of missiles like the BrahMos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Weapons like the BrahMos are primarily aimed at ships.
Yes, you could also use it as a precision-guided land attack cruise missile, but Pakistan's navy is small and almost irrelevant for conflict with India.This weapon - and, indeed, much of India's military development - is about maintaining military competitiveness with China, and to some extent the ability to discourage the US from interfering if India conducts military operations in areas it regards as its sphere of influence.The US Navy is apparently upgrading its cruise missile defences on its ships, replacing the Phalanx gun-based system with a missile-based version, because of missiles like the BrahMos.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560264</id>
	<title>hmmmm</title>
	<author>Eggbloke</author>
	<datestamp>1269166560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What could India want with a <i>manoeuvrable</i> supersonic cruise missile?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What could India want with a manoeuvrable supersonic cruise missile ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What could India want with a manoeuvrable supersonic cruise missile?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559944</id>
	<title>Thanks, India</title>
	<author>ClosedSource</author>
	<datestamp>1269164580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You've just given another argument to hard-liners in the middle east to push their countries to go nuclear.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 've just given another argument to hard-liners in the middle east to push their countries to go nuclear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You've just given another argument to hard-liners in the middle east to push their countries to go nuclear.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559976</id>
	<title>Russian P-500\_Bazalt was online in 1973</title>
	<author>schwit1</author>
	<datestamp>1269164760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-500\_Bazalt" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-500\_Bazalt</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-500 \ _Bazalt [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-500\_Bazalt [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31567744</id>
	<title>Re:Tech Support Call</title>
	<author>Veneratio</author>
	<datestamp>1269271140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dell supports cruise missiles now?</p><p>*shudder*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dell supports cruise missiles now ?
* shudder *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dell supports cruise missiles now?
*shudder*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559920</id>
	<title>Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269164400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The first?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The first ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31570570
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560828
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31562110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31568174
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561364
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31566288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561304
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31562374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31564616
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31564038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560586
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31564246
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31564444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31576416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31562250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31564680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31565960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31564354
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31567744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561200
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31569694
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31562832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31562308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31565130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_21_2034243_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_2034243.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31562250
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_2034243.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560212
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561304
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31566288
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_2034243.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560774
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_2034243.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560010
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_2034243.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31564680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560364
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563422
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31562374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560522
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_2034243.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561142
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_2034243.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561128
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_2034243.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561200
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563148
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_2034243.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560586
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563920
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_2034243.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560012
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560098
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561426
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31564444
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560854
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560376
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561002
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561364
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31564038
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31565130
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561086
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560322
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31570570
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_2034243.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560400
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_2034243.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559928
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_2034243.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560646
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560142
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31568174
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31567744
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31564354
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31569694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31564246
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561080
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31565960
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_2034243.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560498
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31576416
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_2034243.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31562832
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_2034243.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31564616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563176
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560444
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561150
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560418
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561378
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31563912
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_2034243.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559976
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_2034243.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561248
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_2034243.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560102
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_2034243.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31561404
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_21_2034243.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31559978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31562308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31562110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_21_2034243.31560374
</commentlist>
</conversation>
