<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_18_158238</id>
	<title>Filming For <em>The Hobbit</em> Begins In July</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1268927700000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>krou writes <i>"Sir Ian McKellen has revealed that <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8573948.stm">filming for <em>The Hobbit</em> and its sequel is scheduled to begin in July</a>, and will take approximately a year to complete. Casting is now 'taking place in LA, London and New York,' and [director Guillermo] Del Toro is already 'living in Wellington, close to the Jacksons and the studio in Miramar.' Apparently the script is still being worked on, and 'the first draft is crammed with old and new friends, again on a quest in Middle-earth.' The planned sequel to <em>The Hobbit</em> is to be an original story not written by Tolkien, covering the 60 years between <em>The Hobbit</em>, and <em>The Lord of the Rings</em>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>krou writes " Sir Ian McKellen has revealed that filming for The Hobbit and its sequel is scheduled to begin in July , and will take approximately a year to complete .
Casting is now 'taking place in LA , London and New York, ' and [ director Guillermo ] Del Toro is already 'living in Wellington , close to the Jacksons and the studio in Miramar .
' Apparently the script is still being worked on , and 'the first draft is crammed with old and new friends , again on a quest in Middle-earth .
' The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an original story not written by Tolkien , covering the 60 years between The Hobbit , and The Lord of the Rings .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>krou writes "Sir Ian McKellen has revealed that filming for The Hobbit and its sequel is scheduled to begin in July, and will take approximately a year to complete.
Casting is now 'taking place in LA, London and New York,' and [director Guillermo] Del Toro is already 'living in Wellington, close to the Jacksons and the studio in Miramar.
' Apparently the script is still being worked on, and 'the first draft is crammed with old and new friends, again on a quest in Middle-earth.
' The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an original story not written by Tolkien, covering the 60 years between The Hobbit, and The Lord of the Rings.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525890</id>
	<title>Re:better lotr sotry ideas:</title>
	<author>quantaman</author>
	<datestamp>1268941080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>as an aside, i always thought a good jumping off point for lotr fanfiction/ hollywood exploitation would be an examination of the blue wizards:</p><p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue\_Wizards" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue\_Wizards</a> [wikipedia.org] </p><p>so little is sketched by tolkien of them and the world to the east of mordor they went too, that it could make for some great lotr-type stories without stepping on any middle earth toes or the fanboys who guard the mythology's continuity</p><p>it could have an east asian or russian mythology theme, keeping in touch with all those maps that overlay mordor with either germany,  transylvania, or the middle east</p><p>and maybe we would get more oliphants!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-P</p></div><p>I've always felt that the Blue Wizards were a great example of what made Tolkien so great. Virtually nothing is said about the Blue Wizards, but we know they came along with Gandalf and Saruman (and Radagast) then went off to the east, which is about half of Middle-Earth world we know virtually nothing about (other than the fact Sauron apparently had allies there).</p><p>That's part of why I love LOTR, LOTR is huge, but the world its set in feels so much larger.</p><p>That being said I'm not sure how I feel about that part of the mystery being explored, particularly if it's done so in a poor manner. However, they might do it well and introduce even more mystery, and if they do really blow it I can just pretend it never existed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>as an aside , i always thought a good jumping off point for lotr fanfiction/ hollywood exploitation would be an examination of the blue wizards : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue \ _Wizards [ wikipedia.org ] so little is sketched by tolkien of them and the world to the east of mordor they went too , that it could make for some great lotr-type stories without stepping on any middle earth toes or the fanboys who guard the mythology 's continuityit could have an east asian or russian mythology theme , keeping in touch with all those maps that overlay mordor with either germany , transylvania , or the middle eastand maybe we would get more oliphants !
; -PI 've always felt that the Blue Wizards were a great example of what made Tolkien so great .
Virtually nothing is said about the Blue Wizards , but we know they came along with Gandalf and Saruman ( and Radagast ) then went off to the east , which is about half of Middle-Earth world we know virtually nothing about ( other than the fact Sauron apparently had allies there ) .That 's part of why I love LOTR , LOTR is huge , but the world its set in feels so much larger.That being said I 'm not sure how I feel about that part of the mystery being explored , particularly if it 's done so in a poor manner .
However , they might do it well and introduce even more mystery , and if they do really blow it I can just pretend it never existed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as an aside, i always thought a good jumping off point for lotr fanfiction/ hollywood exploitation would be an examination of the blue wizards: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue\_Wizards [wikipedia.org] so little is sketched by tolkien of them and the world to the east of mordor they went too, that it could make for some great lotr-type stories without stepping on any middle earth toes or the fanboys who guard the mythology's continuityit could have an east asian or russian mythology theme, keeping in touch with all those maps that overlay mordor with either germany,  transylvania, or the middle eastand maybe we would get more oliphants!
;-PI've always felt that the Blue Wizards were a great example of what made Tolkien so great.
Virtually nothing is said about the Blue Wizards, but we know they came along with Gandalf and Saruman (and Radagast) then went off to the east, which is about half of Middle-Earth world we know virtually nothing about (other than the fact Sauron apparently had allies there).That's part of why I love LOTR, LOTR is huge, but the world its set in feels so much larger.That being said I'm not sure how I feel about that part of the mystery being explored, particularly if it's done so in a poor manner.
However, they might do it well and introduce even more mystery, and if they do really blow it I can just pretend it never existed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524594</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>bozone</author>
	<datestamp>1268935560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you never know... it could be good</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you never know... it could be good</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you never know... it could be good</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524290</id>
	<title>Re:May be too late.</title>
	<author>GuJiaXian</author>
	<datestamp>1268934120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps we should just sue the actors for aging. That'll show 'em.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps we should just sue the actors for aging .
That 'll show 'em .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps we should just sue the actors for aging.
That'll show 'em.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31528098</id>
	<title>Re:I'll go ahead and be first</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268904180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But Hamlet 2 was awesome!</p><p>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1104733/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But Hamlet 2 was awesome ! http : //www.imdb.com/title/tt1104733/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But Hamlet 2 was awesome!http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1104733/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525200</id>
	<title>Hobbiton won't be ready</title>
	<author>evil\_breeds</author>
	<datestamp>1268938260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just got back from a trip to New Zealand where we visited Hobbiton (Matamata) and the "greens people" had just been there, adding hedges and such.  But it was still very early going, and it looked to me like it would take another year of growing before it had the lived-in look of LOTR.  The tour guide on site suggested something similar, so the stated July start seems odd to me...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just got back from a trip to New Zealand where we visited Hobbiton ( Matamata ) and the " greens people " had just been there , adding hedges and such .
But it was still very early going , and it looked to me like it would take another year of growing before it had the lived-in look of LOTR .
The tour guide on site suggested something similar , so the stated July start seems odd to me.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just got back from a trip to New Zealand where we visited Hobbiton (Matamata) and the "greens people" had just been there, adding hedges and such.
But it was still very early going, and it looked to me like it would take another year of growing before it had the lived-in look of LOTR.
The tour guide on site suggested something similar, so the stated July start seems odd to me...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526768</id>
	<title>Re:ugh, sequel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268943720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But where does Jar Jar come into all of this? (I think I should hide now!)</htmltext>
<tokenext>But where does Jar Jar come into all of this ?
( I think I should hide now !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But where does Jar Jar come into all of this?
(I think I should hide now!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523858</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268932260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Troll? hmmm mods?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Troll ?
hmmm mods ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Troll?
hmmm mods?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525826</id>
	<title>Re:Oh yippy skippy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268940840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cheers for letting me know that he was at the helm.</p><p>The few films of his that i've seen have been piss poor e.g. hellboy was a really big disappointment, even for a comic book adaptation, chronos was equally dire.</p><p>What the hell is he doing in charge....I can just imagine Ron Perlman doing the voice of Smaug (shivers).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cheers for letting me know that he was at the helm.The few films of his that i 've seen have been piss poor e.g .
hellboy was a really big disappointment , even for a comic book adaptation , chronos was equally dire.What the hell is he doing in charge....I can just imagine Ron Perlman doing the voice of Smaug ( shivers ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cheers for letting me know that he was at the helm.The few films of his that i've seen have been piss poor e.g.
hellboy was a really big disappointment, even for a comic book adaptation, chronos was equally dire.What the hell is he doing in charge....I can just imagine Ron Perlman doing the voice of Smaug (shivers).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524276</id>
	<title>Oblig Penny Arcade</title>
	<author>oodaloop</author>
	<datestamp>1268934000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Saruman is a Decepticon!<br> <br>

<a href="http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2008/5/28/" title="penny-arcade.com">http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2008/5/28/</a> [penny-arcade.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Saruman is a Decepticon !
http : //www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2008/5/28/ [ penny-arcade.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Saruman is a Decepticon!
http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2008/5/28/ [penny-arcade.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524658</id>
	<title>Original Sequel</title>
	<author>wisnoskij</author>
	<datestamp>1268935920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Personally I think this should be done a lot more, A lot of writers/directors do not seem to be able to not rework a story when they make it into a movie and i would rather see a new story then a movie with a story that has been changed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Personally I think this should be done a lot more , A lot of writers/directors do not seem to be able to not rework a story when they make it into a movie and i would rather see a new story then a movie with a story that has been changed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personally I think this should be done a lot more, A lot of writers/directors do not seem to be able to not rework a story when they make it into a movie and i would rather see a new story then a movie with a story that has been changed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526332</id>
	<title>Re:They can't just leave it alone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268942400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That would be awesome - as long as I could still have the original unblemished copy of the White Album too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That would be awesome - as long as I could still have the original unblemished copy of the White Album too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would be awesome - as long as I could still have the original unblemished copy of the White Album too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525638</id>
	<title>Re:I'll go ahead and be first</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268940240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> "Hamlet 2: The Revenge of the Prince of Bel Air!"</p><p>There, fixed that for you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Hamlet 2 : The Revenge of the Prince of Bel Air !
" There , fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> "Hamlet 2: The Revenge of the Prince of Bel Air!
"There, fixed that for you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523848</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>Hal\_Porter</author>
	<datestamp>1268932200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I heard George Lucas is writing it. Young Gollum will be a comedy character to lighten the mood. His appearance has been changed a bit to appeal to the 5-10 age range that have the most pester power over merchandise sales, e.g. big floppy bunny ears. To save time it will all be CGI scenery. Human actors will be dosed with Thorazine to make them more docile and easier to pose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard George Lucas is writing it .
Young Gollum will be a comedy character to lighten the mood .
His appearance has been changed a bit to appeal to the 5-10 age range that have the most pester power over merchandise sales , e.g .
big floppy bunny ears .
To save time it will all be CGI scenery .
Human actors will be dosed with Thorazine to make them more docile and easier to pose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard George Lucas is writing it.
Young Gollum will be a comedy character to lighten the mood.
His appearance has been changed a bit to appeal to the 5-10 age range that have the most pester power over merchandise sales, e.g.
big floppy bunny ears.
To save time it will all be CGI scenery.
Human actors will be dosed with Thorazine to make them more docile and easier to pose.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525452</id>
	<title>PO-TAY-TOS!</title>
	<author>newdsfornerds</author>
	<datestamp>1268939400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'sm in a stew.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Boil 'em , mash 'em , stick 'sm in a stew .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'sm in a stew.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524070</id>
	<title>Brilliant timeless dialogue?</title>
	<author>spun</author>
	<datestamp>1268933160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tolkien wrote dialogue? I thought his books were fantasy travelogues: descriptions of places, leaving places, walking through places, and arriving at other places. I don't remember much in the way of dialogue. I just remember lots of walking. Oh, and maybe a few spiders and a dragon or something.</p><p>You see, in order to have 'brilliant timeless dialogue' your characters have to have interesting motivations. The Hobbit was a classic adventure story, which quite simply does not lend itself to interesting motivations or dialogue. The only relevant motivation in an adventure story is "We've got to achieve The Thing!" and the dialogue boils down to"Have we achieved The Thing? No? How do we achieve The Thing? Ah, we need to (go somewhere/get something/kill someone/help someone/destroy something). Let's do that now!" repeated until the answer to the first question is "Yes! We have achieved The Thing!"</p><p>The Hobbit, and Tolkien's other works are nice stories, and amazing for their time, but don't try to make them into something they aren't. "Visually stunning" was exactly what Tolkien was going for, otherwise the books wouldn't read like a travelogue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tolkien wrote dialogue ?
I thought his books were fantasy travelogues : descriptions of places , leaving places , walking through places , and arriving at other places .
I do n't remember much in the way of dialogue .
I just remember lots of walking .
Oh , and maybe a few spiders and a dragon or something.You see , in order to have 'brilliant timeless dialogue ' your characters have to have interesting motivations .
The Hobbit was a classic adventure story , which quite simply does not lend itself to interesting motivations or dialogue .
The only relevant motivation in an adventure story is " We 've got to achieve The Thing !
" and the dialogue boils down to " Have we achieved The Thing ?
No ? How do we achieve The Thing ?
Ah , we need to ( go somewhere/get something/kill someone/help someone/destroy something ) .
Let 's do that now !
" repeated until the answer to the first question is " Yes !
We have achieved The Thing !
" The Hobbit , and Tolkien 's other works are nice stories , and amazing for their time , but do n't try to make them into something they are n't .
" Visually stunning " was exactly what Tolkien was going for , otherwise the books would n't read like a travelogue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tolkien wrote dialogue?
I thought his books were fantasy travelogues: descriptions of places, leaving places, walking through places, and arriving at other places.
I don't remember much in the way of dialogue.
I just remember lots of walking.
Oh, and maybe a few spiders and a dragon or something.You see, in order to have 'brilliant timeless dialogue' your characters have to have interesting motivations.
The Hobbit was a classic adventure story, which quite simply does not lend itself to interesting motivations or dialogue.
The only relevant motivation in an adventure story is "We've got to achieve The Thing!
" and the dialogue boils down to"Have we achieved The Thing?
No? How do we achieve The Thing?
Ah, we need to (go somewhere/get something/kill someone/help someone/destroy something).
Let's do that now!
" repeated until the answer to the first question is "Yes!
We have achieved The Thing!
"The Hobbit, and Tolkien's other works are nice stories, and amazing for their time, but don't try to make them into something they aren't.
"Visually stunning" was exactly what Tolkien was going for, otherwise the books wouldn't read like a travelogue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524006</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>RDW</author>
	<datestamp>1268932860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an *original story not written by Tolkien*'</p><p>Pretty much like most of Jackson's version of 'The Two Towers', then!</p><p>Actually, I wonder how accurate the BBC story is. Jackson and del toro have suggested elsewhere that they intend to spread out the story of 'The Hobbit' over both films, supplemented by material about (e.g.) Gandalf and Dol Guldur:</p><p><a href="http://www.theonering.net/torwp/hobbitfaq/#1.1" title="theonering.net">http://www.theonering.net/torwp/hobbitfaq/#1.1</a> [theonering.net]</p><p>Since details of events outside Bilbo's direct experience are sketchy (LOTR appendices, 'Unfinished Tales', etc.), they'll have to invent quite a lot to fill in the gaps (especially if they intend to include Aragorn's early adventures).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an * original story not written by Tolkien * 'Pretty much like most of Jackson 's version of 'The Two Towers ' , then ! Actually , I wonder how accurate the BBC story is .
Jackson and del toro have suggested elsewhere that they intend to spread out the story of 'The Hobbit ' over both films , supplemented by material about ( e.g .
) Gandalf and Dol Guldur : http : //www.theonering.net/torwp/hobbitfaq/ # 1.1 [ theonering.net ] Since details of events outside Bilbo 's direct experience are sketchy ( LOTR appendices , 'Unfinished Tales ' , etc .
) , they 'll have to invent quite a lot to fill in the gaps ( especially if they intend to include Aragorn 's early adventures ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an *original story not written by Tolkien*'Pretty much like most of Jackson's version of 'The Two Towers', then!Actually, I wonder how accurate the BBC story is.
Jackson and del toro have suggested elsewhere that they intend to spread out the story of 'The Hobbit' over both films, supplemented by material about (e.g.
) Gandalf and Dol Guldur:http://www.theonering.net/torwp/hobbitfaq/#1.1 [theonering.net]Since details of events outside Bilbo's direct experience are sketchy (LOTR appendices, 'Unfinished Tales', etc.
), they'll have to invent quite a lot to fill in the gaps (especially if they intend to include Aragorn's early adventures).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525316</id>
	<title>Ummm There IS no sequel  its now 1 book = 2 movies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268938800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Del Toro stated last year that the two movies are going to be the book split into two. There is no filler between LOTR and the Hobbit anymore, that idea got scrapped.</p><p>"Originally, both parts would have served as separate films. The first would have adapted The Hobbit and the second would have bridged the gap between this and The Lord of the Rings. It is now the director's intention to split and expand the narrative of The Hobbit over two parts of a singular film."</p><p>Jeeze all the hate over something that isn't even gonna happen!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Del Toro stated last year that the two movies are going to be the book split into two .
There is no filler between LOTR and the Hobbit anymore , that idea got scrapped .
" Originally , both parts would have served as separate films .
The first would have adapted The Hobbit and the second would have bridged the gap between this and The Lord of the Rings .
It is now the director 's intention to split and expand the narrative of The Hobbit over two parts of a singular film .
" Jeeze all the hate over something that is n't even gon na happen !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Del Toro stated last year that the two movies are going to be the book split into two.
There is no filler between LOTR and the Hobbit anymore, that idea got scrapped.
"Originally, both parts would have served as separate films.
The first would have adapted The Hobbit and the second would have bridged the gap between this and The Lord of the Rings.
It is now the director's intention to split and expand the narrative of The Hobbit over two parts of a singular film.
"Jeeze all the hate over something that isn't even gonna happen!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523824</id>
	<title>Re:The audition</title>
	<author>zero\_out</author>
	<datestamp>1268932140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Furries?  Let's see, what roles could they play...  a spider?  Naw.  How about a goblin?  Nope.  A warg?  Hm...   a nasty super-wolf ridden by green midgets.  Maybe.  A Great Eagle?  No way.  A troll?  Not a chance.  Well, I guess all those furries are going to be disappointed, since the wargs in LOTR were CG.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Furries ?
Let 's see , what roles could they play... a spider ?
Naw. How about a goblin ?
Nope. A warg ?
Hm... a nasty super-wolf ridden by green midgets .
Maybe. A Great Eagle ?
No way .
A troll ?
Not a chance .
Well , I guess all those furries are going to be disappointed , since the wargs in LOTR were CG .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Furries?
Let's see, what roles could they play...  a spider?
Naw.  How about a goblin?
Nope.  A warg?
Hm...   a nasty super-wolf ridden by green midgets.
Maybe.  A Great Eagle?
No way.
A troll?
Not a chance.
Well, I guess all those furries are going to be disappointed, since the wargs in LOTR were CG.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525628</id>
	<title>Re:Brilliant timeless dialogue?</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1268940240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The only relevant motivation in an adventure story is "We've got to achieve The Thing!" and the dialogue boils down to"Have we achieved The Thing? No? How do we achieve The Thing? Ah, we need to (go somewhere/get something/kill someone/help someone/destroy something). Let's do that now!" repeated until the answer to the first question is "Yes! We have achieved The Thing!"</i></p><p>Hey, that was the exact dialogue between John Carpenter and Kurt Russel in the novelization of the behind-the-scenes documentary of the making of one of Carpenter's best-loved moives.  It was called "Fellowship of The Thing".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only relevant motivation in an adventure story is " We 've got to achieve The Thing !
" and the dialogue boils down to " Have we achieved The Thing ?
No ? How do we achieve The Thing ?
Ah , we need to ( go somewhere/get something/kill someone/help someone/destroy something ) .
Let 's do that now !
" repeated until the answer to the first question is " Yes !
We have achieved The Thing !
" Hey , that was the exact dialogue between John Carpenter and Kurt Russel in the novelization of the behind-the-scenes documentary of the making of one of Carpenter 's best-loved moives .
It was called " Fellowship of The Thing " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only relevant motivation in an adventure story is "We've got to achieve The Thing!
" and the dialogue boils down to"Have we achieved The Thing?
No? How do we achieve The Thing?
Ah, we need to (go somewhere/get something/kill someone/help someone/destroy something).
Let's do that now!
" repeated until the answer to the first question is "Yes!
We have achieved The Thing!
"Hey, that was the exact dialogue between John Carpenter and Kurt Russel in the novelization of the behind-the-scenes documentary of the making of one of Carpenter's best-loved moives.
It was called "Fellowship of The Thing".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31530704</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268915400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank you for wanting me to PUNCH THE FUCKING SCREEN in pure troll-induced rage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you for wanting me to PUNCH THE FUCKING SCREEN in pure troll-induced rage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you for wanting me to PUNCH THE FUCKING SCREEN in pure troll-induced rage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523936</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>Jaysyn</author>
	<datestamp>1268932560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ooh, looks like I pissed off a Peter Jackson fanboy with mod points!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ooh , looks like I pissed off a Peter Jackson fanboy with mod points !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ooh, looks like I pissed off a Peter Jackson fanboy with mod points!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524480</id>
	<title>Re:Oh yippy skippy</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1268935020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tolkien's dialogue can't, and never could, survive a direct adaptation to the big screen. Even if it could be managed, people would still complain that the actors didn't act in the manner that they themselves had envisioned while reading the books. Perhaps more importantly, books have the luxury of taking up entire chapters to describe background, settings, and conversations; movies do not. Tolkien purists will never be satisfied with *any* adaptation of his work. Luckily for them, the source material will always be available for their enjoyment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tolkien 's dialogue ca n't , and never could , survive a direct adaptation to the big screen .
Even if it could be managed , people would still complain that the actors did n't act in the manner that they themselves had envisioned while reading the books .
Perhaps more importantly , books have the luxury of taking up entire chapters to describe background , settings , and conversations ; movies do not .
Tolkien purists will never be satisfied with * any * adaptation of his work .
Luckily for them , the source material will always be available for their enjoyment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tolkien's dialogue can't, and never could, survive a direct adaptation to the big screen.
Even if it could be managed, people would still complain that the actors didn't act in the manner that they themselves had envisioned while reading the books.
Perhaps more importantly, books have the luxury of taking up entire chapters to describe background, settings, and conversations; movies do not.
Tolkien purists will never be satisfied with *any* adaptation of his work.
Luckily for them, the source material will always be available for their enjoyment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523972</id>
	<title>I'll go ahead and be first</title>
	<author>BobMcD</author>
	<datestamp>1268932740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm in favor of the sequel.  In all due reverence to Tolkien, there are other authors on this planet who have done well with fantasy works.  In fact every single work of modern fantasy is derivative from Tolkien's works, and if you've ever enjoyed any of them, there's a distinct risk you'll enjoy this, too.</p><p>What's more, since you haven't read this particular book, you're probably less likely to be underwhelmed by it.  You can't compare the dialog to a book which doesn't exist.</p><p>Finally, I think it absolutely vital for fantasy, and all fiction everywhere, to move beyond reverence for certain works.  Somehow humanity managed to move beyond Shakespeare, creating new-ish works which we prefer to his, and I believe we can move beyond Tolkien.  I also feel that making a new work in that same setting can be a catalyst for that evolution.</p><p>I'm also a strong proponent of 'Lucas' Law' wherein we can democratically remove an author's control over a project if they cease to contribute to society.  Introduce one too many Jar-Jar-Binks-types and the people put a referendum on the ballot to put your work into the public domain...</p><p>Tolkien's work should be eligible for this transition as well, because nothing new is coming out of it.  Or nothing was, until this sequel.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm in favor of the sequel .
In all due reverence to Tolkien , there are other authors on this planet who have done well with fantasy works .
In fact every single work of modern fantasy is derivative from Tolkien 's works , and if you 've ever enjoyed any of them , there 's a distinct risk you 'll enjoy this , too.What 's more , since you have n't read this particular book , you 're probably less likely to be underwhelmed by it .
You ca n't compare the dialog to a book which does n't exist.Finally , I think it absolutely vital for fantasy , and all fiction everywhere , to move beyond reverence for certain works .
Somehow humanity managed to move beyond Shakespeare , creating new-ish works which we prefer to his , and I believe we can move beyond Tolkien .
I also feel that making a new work in that same setting can be a catalyst for that evolution.I 'm also a strong proponent of 'Lucas ' Law ' wherein we can democratically remove an author 's control over a project if they cease to contribute to society .
Introduce one too many Jar-Jar-Binks-types and the people put a referendum on the ballot to put your work into the public domain...Tolkien 's work should be eligible for this transition as well , because nothing new is coming out of it .
Or nothing was , until this sequel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm in favor of the sequel.
In all due reverence to Tolkien, there are other authors on this planet who have done well with fantasy works.
In fact every single work of modern fantasy is derivative from Tolkien's works, and if you've ever enjoyed any of them, there's a distinct risk you'll enjoy this, too.What's more, since you haven't read this particular book, you're probably less likely to be underwhelmed by it.
You can't compare the dialog to a book which doesn't exist.Finally, I think it absolutely vital for fantasy, and all fiction everywhere, to move beyond reverence for certain works.
Somehow humanity managed to move beyond Shakespeare, creating new-ish works which we prefer to his, and I believe we can move beyond Tolkien.
I also feel that making a new work in that same setting can be a catalyst for that evolution.I'm also a strong proponent of 'Lucas' Law' wherein we can democratically remove an author's control over a project if they cease to contribute to society.
Introduce one too many Jar-Jar-Binks-types and the people put a referendum on the ballot to put your work into the public domain...Tolkien's work should be eligible for this transition as well, because nothing new is coming out of it.
Or nothing was, until this sequel.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31527956</id>
	<title>Re:"The Hobbit" not "The Hobbit" ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268903820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about Disney's "The Black Cauldron"?</p><p>Or the "Call of the Wild" and "White Fang" movies...</p><p>It's not the first nor is it likely to be the last time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about Disney 's " The Black Cauldron " ? Or the " Call of the Wild " and " White Fang " movies...It 's not the first nor is it likely to be the last time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about Disney's "The Black Cauldron"?Or the "Call of the Wild" and "White Fang" movies...It's not the first nor is it likely to be the last time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524316</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel? No, give us Silmarillion</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1268934240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I doubt it.</p><p>As impressive as the Silmarillion is as an exercise in world building, it lacks the narrative ingenuity and poetic diction of LotR and even the humble *Hobbit*.   The sheer scale and grandeur of the stories almost overshadows the characters in them.  It is the personal urgency of doing the right thing that drives the action of LotR, at the end of which we see the entire providential tapestry.  The characters of the Silmarillion are largely trapped by fate in a doomed struggle with a foe far beyond their strength.  It's extremely un-dramatic.  There's hardly any dialog.</p><p>Not that this couldn't be shaped into drama, but you'd need a Shakespeare to do it justice.   I like to imagine what he'd do with the Akallab&#234;th.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt it.As impressive as the Silmarillion is as an exercise in world building , it lacks the narrative ingenuity and poetic diction of LotR and even the humble * Hobbit * .
The sheer scale and grandeur of the stories almost overshadows the characters in them .
It is the personal urgency of doing the right thing that drives the action of LotR , at the end of which we see the entire providential tapestry .
The characters of the Silmarillion are largely trapped by fate in a doomed struggle with a foe far beyond their strength .
It 's extremely un-dramatic .
There 's hardly any dialog.Not that this could n't be shaped into drama , but you 'd need a Shakespeare to do it justice .
I like to imagine what he 'd do with the Akallab   th .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt it.As impressive as the Silmarillion is as an exercise in world building, it lacks the narrative ingenuity and poetic diction of LotR and even the humble *Hobbit*.
The sheer scale and grandeur of the stories almost overshadows the characters in them.
It is the personal urgency of doing the right thing that drives the action of LotR, at the end of which we see the entire providential tapestry.
The characters of the Silmarillion are largely trapped by fate in a doomed struggle with a foe far beyond their strength.
It's extremely un-dramatic.
There's hardly any dialog.Not that this couldn't be shaped into drama, but you'd need a Shakespeare to do it justice.
I like to imagine what he'd do with the Akallabêth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523910</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524144</id>
	<title>Re:I'll go ahead and be first</title>
	<author>VShael</author>
	<datestamp>1268933520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I think it absolutely vital for fantasy, and all fiction everywhere, to move beyond reverence for certain works. </i></p><p><i>Somehow humanity managed to move beyond Shakespeare, creating new-ish works which we prefer to his, and I believe we can move beyond Tolkien</i></p><p>Yeah, there's a difference between making a modern adaptation of Shakespeare, or even a whole other thing INSPIRED by Shakespeare, and writing "Hamlet 2: The Revenge of the Prince!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it absolutely vital for fantasy , and all fiction everywhere , to move beyond reverence for certain works .
Somehow humanity managed to move beyond Shakespeare , creating new-ish works which we prefer to his , and I believe we can move beyond TolkienYeah , there 's a difference between making a modern adaptation of Shakespeare , or even a whole other thing INSPIRED by Shakespeare , and writing " Hamlet 2 : The Revenge of the Prince !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it absolutely vital for fantasy, and all fiction everywhere, to move beyond reverence for certain works.
Somehow humanity managed to move beyond Shakespeare, creating new-ish works which we prefer to his, and I believe we can move beyond TolkienYeah, there's a difference between making a modern adaptation of Shakespeare, or even a whole other thing INSPIRED by Shakespeare, and writing "Hamlet 2: The Revenge of the Prince!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31533332</id>
	<title>Re:Brilliant timeless dialogue?</title>
	<author>Lunzo</author>
	<datestamp>1268938620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You do know that Tolkien's time is the 20th Century. Your pithy "amazing for their time" comment means they're still amazing today.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do know that Tolkien 's time is the 20th Century .
Your pithy " amazing for their time " comment means they 're still amazing today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do know that Tolkien's time is the 20th Century.
Your pithy "amazing for their time" comment means they're still amazing today.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31534148</id>
	<title>Re:Oh yippy skippy</title>
	<author>tehcyder</author>
	<datestamp>1268996220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The films are superb. The books are a trial to read.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Well, you're half right...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The films are superb .
The books are a trial to read .
Well , you 're half right.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The films are superb.
The books are a trial to read.
Well, you're half right...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524152</id>
	<title>Re:Oh yippy skippy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268933580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Get over it, already.</p><p>Tolkien was not a writer, he was a linguist and English professor, and it shows. His world building, mythology, and language development is awe-inspiring. His writing, dialogue, plot development and pacing is atrocious.</p><p>Plus, much of the "flat modern drivel" you are complaining about, was merely a rearrangement of the originial text, or reassignment of dialogue between characters.</p><p>Again, get over it.</p><p>The films are superb. The books are a trial to read.<br>(And I say that as a 35 year old fantasy and SF fan who has read widely and deeply. If you want some <i>good</i> fantasy writing, just pick up some Le Guin, or Octavia Butler, or Delaney, or Wolfe, or any other number of fantastic authors.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Get over it , already.Tolkien was not a writer , he was a linguist and English professor , and it shows .
His world building , mythology , and language development is awe-inspiring .
His writing , dialogue , plot development and pacing is atrocious.Plus , much of the " flat modern drivel " you are complaining about , was merely a rearrangement of the originial text , or reassignment of dialogue between characters.Again , get over it.The films are superb .
The books are a trial to read .
( And I say that as a 35 year old fantasy and SF fan who has read widely and deeply .
If you want some good fantasy writing , just pick up some Le Guin , or Octavia Butler , or Delaney , or Wolfe , or any other number of fantastic authors .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get over it, already.Tolkien was not a writer, he was a linguist and English professor, and it shows.
His world building, mythology, and language development is awe-inspiring.
His writing, dialogue, plot development and pacing is atrocious.Plus, much of the "flat modern drivel" you are complaining about, was merely a rearrangement of the originial text, or reassignment of dialogue between characters.Again, get over it.The films are superb.
The books are a trial to read.
(And I say that as a 35 year old fantasy and SF fan who has read widely and deeply.
If you want some good fantasy writing, just pick up some Le Guin, or Octavia Butler, or Delaney, or Wolfe, or any other number of fantastic authors.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525146</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>uberjack</author>
	<datestamp>1268938020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't understand why the original story - both Silmarillion and Children of Hurin are excellent sources for future films.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand why the original story - both Silmarillion and Children of Hurin are excellent sources for future films .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand why the original story - both Silmarillion and Children of Hurin are excellent sources for future films.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524228</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel? No, give us Silmarillion</title>
	<author>pieceofstone</author>
	<datestamp>1268933880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the news article is wrong/has outdated information. See  <a href="http://www.aintitcool.com/node/41848" title="aintitcool.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.aintitcool.com/node/41848</a> [aintitcool.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the news article is wrong/has outdated information .
See http : //www.aintitcool.com/node/41848 [ aintitcool.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the news article is wrong/has outdated information.
See  http://www.aintitcool.com/node/41848 [aintitcool.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523910</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31527030</id>
	<title>Re:I'll go ahead and be first</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268944440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>In fact every single work of modern fantasy is derivative from Tolkien's works, and if you've ever enjoyed any of them, there's a distinct risk you'll enjoy this, too.</i></p><p>That's pretty much bullshit. Hard to believe that in the same post where you mention Shakespeare, you say that modern fantasy started with Tolkien... In the centuries after Shakespeare, people probably said the same thing about the Brothers Grimm or the Bible or any number of oral traditions about Grendel or King Arthur. Heck, read the Talmud in the original Klingon or the Vedas in the original !tharsi! and tell me again that Tolkien was the first.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In fact every single work of modern fantasy is derivative from Tolkien 's works , and if you 've ever enjoyed any of them , there 's a distinct risk you 'll enjoy this , too.That 's pretty much bullshit .
Hard to believe that in the same post where you mention Shakespeare , you say that modern fantasy started with Tolkien... In the centuries after Shakespeare , people probably said the same thing about the Brothers Grimm or the Bible or any number of oral traditions about Grendel or King Arthur .
Heck , read the Talmud in the original Klingon or the Vedas in the original ! tharsi !
and tell me again that Tolkien was the first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In fact every single work of modern fantasy is derivative from Tolkien's works, and if you've ever enjoyed any of them, there's a distinct risk you'll enjoy this, too.That's pretty much bullshit.
Hard to believe that in the same post where you mention Shakespeare, you say that modern fantasy started with Tolkien... In the centuries after Shakespeare, people probably said the same thing about the Brothers Grimm or the Bible or any number of oral traditions about Grendel or King Arthur.
Heck, read the Talmud in the original Klingon or the Vedas in the original !tharsi!
and tell me again that Tolkien was the first.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524214</id>
	<title>A good hobbit pipe</title>
	<author>TiggertheMad</author>
	<datestamp>1268933820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>
"The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an *original story not written by Tolkien*, covering the 60 years between The Hobbit, and the Lord of the Rings."

Thanks but no thanks.
</i>
<br> <br>
Hey come on now, Tolkien's grand kids need Ferraris, hookers, and blow. Don't begrudge them the simple hobbit necessities of life....</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an * original story not written by Tolkien * , covering the 60 years between The Hobbit , and the Lord of the Rings .
" Thanks but no thanks .
Hey come on now , Tolkien 's grand kids need Ferraris , hookers , and blow .
Do n't begrudge them the simple hobbit necessities of life... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
"The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an *original story not written by Tolkien*, covering the 60 years between The Hobbit, and the Lord of the Rings.
"

Thanks but no thanks.
Hey come on now, Tolkien's grand kids need Ferraris, hookers, and blow.
Don't begrudge them the simple hobbit necessities of life....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525356</id>
	<title>Some books only need one movie...</title>
	<author>pandrijeczko</author>
	<datestamp>1268938920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...like Battlefield Earth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...like Battlefield Earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...like Battlefield Earth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525082</id>
	<title>Re:I'll go ahead and be first</title>
	<author>hoggoth</author>
	<datestamp>1268937780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; In all due reverence to Tolkien, there are other authors on this planet who have done well with fantasy works.</p><p>I hope they get the writer who wrote the screenplay for "Mansquito". That was awesome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; In all due reverence to Tolkien , there are other authors on this planet who have done well with fantasy works.I hope they get the writer who wrote the screenplay for " Mansquito " .
That was awesome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; In all due reverence to Tolkien, there are other authors on this planet who have done well with fantasy works.I hope they get the writer who wrote the screenplay for "Mansquito".
That was awesome.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523968</id>
	<title>Re:Oh yippy skippy</title>
	<author>MozeeToby</author>
	<datestamp>1268932740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Three words, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan's\_Labyrinth" title="wikipedia.org">Guillermo</a> [wikipedia.org] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cronos\_(film)" title="wikipedia.org">del</a> [wikipedia.org] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Devil's\_Backbone" title="wikipedia.org">Toro</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Three words , Guillermo [ wikipedia.org ] del [ wikipedia.org ] Toro [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Three words, Guillermo [wikipedia.org] del [wikipedia.org] Toro [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31532790</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268932320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fewer things in geekdom are sadder than a bitter Star Wars nerd so desperate to keep his undying hate alive that he'll resort to just making shit up so he can hate it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fewer things in geekdom are sadder than a bitter Star Wars nerd so desperate to keep his undying hate alive that he 'll resort to just making shit up so he can hate it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fewer things in geekdom are sadder than a bitter Star Wars nerd so desperate to keep his undying hate alive that he'll resort to just making shit up so he can hate it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524436</id>
	<title>The sequel will not be an unknown story</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268934720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>From theonering.net
<br>
<br>
1.2. What will be included in the two movies?
According to the Empire Online interview with PJ and GDT (link above), the two movies will include all of the iconic moments in the book, The Hobbit, as well as being expanded to follow other events that occur &lsquo;offstage.&rsquo; This includes the White Council and Gandalf&rsquo;s comings and goings to Dol Guldur.  Pj: &ldquo;We expanded out the universe a lot more so that we weren&rsquo;t just staying with Bilbo and the Dwarves on their journey, as the book pretty much does. We started to expand some of what&rsquo;s happening to Gandalf outside of that journey.&rdquo;  Things we know are included so far:

- backstory of Thrain, Thorin&rsquo;s father

- Beorn

- Spiders

- The White Council

- Gandalf&rsquo;s journeys to Dol Guldur

- The three trolls (Tom, Bert, William)

- Sauron ( including some of his history)</htmltext>
<tokenext>From theonering.net 1.2 .
What will be included in the two movies ?
According to the Empire Online interview with PJ and GDT ( link above ) , the two movies will include all of the iconic moments in the book , The Hobbit , as well as being expanded to follow other events that occur    offstage.    This includes the White Council and Gandalf    s comings and goings to Dol Guldur .
Pj :    We expanded out the universe a lot more so that we weren    t just staying with Bilbo and the Dwarves on their journey , as the book pretty much does .
We started to expand some of what    s happening to Gandalf outside of that journey.    Things we know are included so far : - backstory of Thrain , Thorin    s father - Beorn - Spiders - The White Council - Gandalf    s journeys to Dol Guldur - The three trolls ( Tom , Bert , William ) - Sauron ( including some of his history )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From theonering.net


1.2.
What will be included in the two movies?
According to the Empire Online interview with PJ and GDT (link above), the two movies will include all of the iconic moments in the book, The Hobbit, as well as being expanded to follow other events that occur ‘offstage.’ This includes the White Council and Gandalf’s comings and goings to Dol Guldur.
Pj: “We expanded out the universe a lot more so that we weren’t just staying with Bilbo and the Dwarves on their journey, as the book pretty much does.
We started to expand some of what’s happening to Gandalf outside of that journey.”  Things we know are included so far:

- backstory of Thrain, Thorin’s father

- Beorn

- Spiders

- The White Council

- Gandalf’s journeys to Dol Guldur

- The three trolls (Tom, Bert, William)

- Sauron ( including some of his history)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525626</id>
	<title>Re:I'll go ahead and be first</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268940180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No one has ever done well with fantasy works.  They are universally lame.</p><p>e.g. Thorzon of Amarik strikes out with his magic lance at Saurok the Bold! etc etc etc.  It's impossible to write this drivel well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No one has ever done well with fantasy works .
They are universally lame.e.g .
Thorzon of Amarik strikes out with his magic lance at Saurok the Bold !
etc etc etc .
It 's impossible to write this drivel well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No one has ever done well with fantasy works.
They are universally lame.e.g.
Thorzon of Amarik strikes out with his magic lance at Saurok the Bold!
etc etc etc.
It's impossible to write this drivel well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523912</id>
	<title>"The Hobbit" not "The Hobbit" ?</title>
	<author>CannonballHead</author>
	<datestamp>1268932500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How can you call something by a book name and not actually be referring to the book?  That seems weird.  *sigh*</htmltext>
<tokenext>How can you call something by a book name and not actually be referring to the book ?
That seems weird .
* sigh *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can you call something by a book name and not actually be referring to the book?
That seems weird.
*sigh*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31534118</id>
	<title>Re:Oh yippy skippy</title>
	<author>tehcyder</author>
	<datestamp>1268995800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Tolkien's brilliant timeless dialog</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
You are joking, right?
<br>
<br>
Whether you love or loathe him, no-one would say dialog was his strong point.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tolkien 's brilliant timeless dialog You are joking , right ?
Whether you love or loathe him , no-one would say dialog was his strong point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tolkien's brilliant timeless dialog

You are joking, right?
Whether you love or loathe him, no-one would say dialog was his strong point.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31530478</id>
	<title>in other news</title>
	<author>Nyder</author>
	<datestamp>1268914200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>George Lucas has written the screen play to a sequel of a popular fantasy series.    "Screw hobbits," says George in an interview, "ewoks is where it's at."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>George Lucas has written the screen play to a sequel of a popular fantasy series .
" Screw hobbits , " says George in an interview , " ewoks is where it 's at .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>George Lucas has written the screen play to a sequel of a popular fantasy series.
"Screw hobbits," says George in an interview, "ewoks is where it's at.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524862</id>
	<title>Well</title>
	<author>kenp2002</author>
	<datestamp>1268936880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A: Tolkien was good, but not great. So the high and mightys worring about a sequel, rest: The Hobbit was a good book but it is hardly the greatest Fantasy Novel ever. In fact parts of Tolkien's writing is just plain boring. For all the people that bitch about copyright lasting too long and stifiling innovation and crap all bets are off if they think about expanding on Tolkien. I mean seriously could you imagine someone writing books about Star Wars besides Lucas? Madness they would all suck and drain the life out of his creative masterpiece!</p><p>I mean come on that Tim Zhanwhatever's sequel's to Star Wars were aweful and destroyed the franchise right? Mara Jade = Jar Jar err wait....</p><p>So It comes down to the Lost years between the two. No problem since there are plenty of unanswered questions between the two.</p><p>Relax. It is no more likely to suck then the movie the Hobbit itself.</p><p>Case Point: Star Wars -&gt; Empire is to Matrix -&gt; Whatever that shit they crap out was called. Nothing about a second movie implies it being worse then the original statistically speaking. Both the first and second Friday the 13ths were pretty good compared to the rest of the franchise.</p><p>On a more serious note let's not forget that the Hobbit is also considered on of the WORST books ever written since the perspective changes 1/2 through the book (actually isn't it like 1/3rd of the way in?) You can't really fuck up the movie more then that and we still call the Hobbit a great work... It's like Hobbits are Fuck-Up-Proof!</p><p>B: Butchering the story in making it a movie. Well they've tried what 4 times now and failed every time. They may not know what to do right but they'll have plenty of archive material to tell them what they did wrong. Yes they are going to rape your childhood, too bad it isn't yours anymore. Grab some lube if you are worried.</p><p>C: Flat acting concerns... Well... actually that might work better. The Hobbit was a pretty flat affair of classic folklore. The Elves should be flat (they are a rather dull people to begin with) and Dildo, I mean Bilbo wasn't much fun. Bard comes pretty much otta nowhere, the dwarves couldn't have been more of a Bavarian carcature if you tried, and the classical elements are all there almost page for page (Heroes' journey blah blah blah.)</p><p>I know I am old and cynical but seriously, Star War, B5, Star Trek, LOTR\Hobbit, Star Ship Troopers, Discworld are great and fun works but they are not "Mental\Spiritual\Philisophical\Humanistic Awakening" causing works. They good, they will be around in 100 years for sure, but few if any are going to pick up the Hobbit and say 40 years later, "They day I picked up the Hobbit was the day my life truely changed for the better."</p><p>Tolkien = Good, but so is Terry Brooks, Ann Mcaffery, Weis and Hickman, etc.</p><p>I would in all honesty be more excited about a Shanara movie then the Hobbit. I would also be more excited about winning $50 on a lottery scratch off.</p><p>That is the problem as you get older, the underlying plots are all the same and it is harder and harder to not notice that long enough to enjoy the movie. Like Avatar.... ZZzz.... Dances with Wolves in Space......</p><p>I am actually more interested in the proposed sequel to the Hobbit then the movie. I'd like to see something unexpected and new. No matter what a movie cannot compare with a book (even a comic book to a degree) because you can set the pace, you control to a greater degree what the world looks like, etc.</p><p>Just chill and try to enjoy the movie on it's own merits and if you can't, like me, rent and bitch about it at home and quit ruining the movie for those that can.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A : Tolkien was good , but not great .
So the high and mightys worring about a sequel , rest : The Hobbit was a good book but it is hardly the greatest Fantasy Novel ever .
In fact parts of Tolkien 's writing is just plain boring .
For all the people that bitch about copyright lasting too long and stifiling innovation and crap all bets are off if they think about expanding on Tolkien .
I mean seriously could you imagine someone writing books about Star Wars besides Lucas ?
Madness they would all suck and drain the life out of his creative masterpiece ! I mean come on that Tim Zhanwhatever 's sequel 's to Star Wars were aweful and destroyed the franchise right ?
Mara Jade = Jar Jar err wait....So It comes down to the Lost years between the two .
No problem since there are plenty of unanswered questions between the two.Relax .
It is no more likely to suck then the movie the Hobbit itself.Case Point : Star Wars - &gt; Empire is to Matrix - &gt; Whatever that shit they crap out was called .
Nothing about a second movie implies it being worse then the original statistically speaking .
Both the first and second Friday the 13ths were pretty good compared to the rest of the franchise.On a more serious note let 's not forget that the Hobbit is also considered on of the WORST books ever written since the perspective changes 1/2 through the book ( actually is n't it like 1/3rd of the way in ?
) You ca n't really fuck up the movie more then that and we still call the Hobbit a great work... It 's like Hobbits are Fuck-Up-Proof ! B : Butchering the story in making it a movie .
Well they 've tried what 4 times now and failed every time .
They may not know what to do right but they 'll have plenty of archive material to tell them what they did wrong .
Yes they are going to rape your childhood , too bad it is n't yours anymore .
Grab some lube if you are worried.C : Flat acting concerns... Well... actually that might work better .
The Hobbit was a pretty flat affair of classic folklore .
The Elves should be flat ( they are a rather dull people to begin with ) and Dildo , I mean Bilbo was n't much fun .
Bard comes pretty much otta nowhere , the dwarves could n't have been more of a Bavarian carcature if you tried , and the classical elements are all there almost page for page ( Heroes ' journey blah blah blah .
) I know I am old and cynical but seriously , Star War , B5 , Star Trek , LOTR \ Hobbit , Star Ship Troopers , Discworld are great and fun works but they are not " Mental \ Spiritual \ Philisophical \ Humanistic Awakening " causing works .
They good , they will be around in 100 years for sure , but few if any are going to pick up the Hobbit and say 40 years later , " They day I picked up the Hobbit was the day my life truely changed for the better .
" Tolkien = Good , but so is Terry Brooks , Ann Mcaffery , Weis and Hickman , etc.I would in all honesty be more excited about a Shanara movie then the Hobbit .
I would also be more excited about winning $ 50 on a lottery scratch off.That is the problem as you get older , the underlying plots are all the same and it is harder and harder to not notice that long enough to enjoy the movie .
Like Avatar.... ZZzz.... Dances with Wolves in Space......I am actually more interested in the proposed sequel to the Hobbit then the movie .
I 'd like to see something unexpected and new .
No matter what a movie can not compare with a book ( even a comic book to a degree ) because you can set the pace , you control to a greater degree what the world looks like , etc.Just chill and try to enjoy the movie on it 's own merits and if you ca n't , like me , rent and bitch about it at home and quit ruining the movie for those that can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A: Tolkien was good, but not great.
So the high and mightys worring about a sequel, rest: The Hobbit was a good book but it is hardly the greatest Fantasy Novel ever.
In fact parts of Tolkien's writing is just plain boring.
For all the people that bitch about copyright lasting too long and stifiling innovation and crap all bets are off if they think about expanding on Tolkien.
I mean seriously could you imagine someone writing books about Star Wars besides Lucas?
Madness they would all suck and drain the life out of his creative masterpiece!I mean come on that Tim Zhanwhatever's sequel's to Star Wars were aweful and destroyed the franchise right?
Mara Jade = Jar Jar err wait....So It comes down to the Lost years between the two.
No problem since there are plenty of unanswered questions between the two.Relax.
It is no more likely to suck then the movie the Hobbit itself.Case Point: Star Wars -&gt; Empire is to Matrix -&gt; Whatever that shit they crap out was called.
Nothing about a second movie implies it being worse then the original statistically speaking.
Both the first and second Friday the 13ths were pretty good compared to the rest of the franchise.On a more serious note let's not forget that the Hobbit is also considered on of the WORST books ever written since the perspective changes 1/2 through the book (actually isn't it like 1/3rd of the way in?
) You can't really fuck up the movie more then that and we still call the Hobbit a great work... It's like Hobbits are Fuck-Up-Proof!B: Butchering the story in making it a movie.
Well they've tried what 4 times now and failed every time.
They may not know what to do right but they'll have plenty of archive material to tell them what they did wrong.
Yes they are going to rape your childhood, too bad it isn't yours anymore.
Grab some lube if you are worried.C: Flat acting concerns... Well... actually that might work better.
The Hobbit was a pretty flat affair of classic folklore.
The Elves should be flat (they are a rather dull people to begin with) and Dildo, I mean Bilbo wasn't much fun.
Bard comes pretty much otta nowhere, the dwarves couldn't have been more of a Bavarian carcature if you tried, and the classical elements are all there almost page for page (Heroes' journey blah blah blah.
)I know I am old and cynical but seriously, Star War, B5, Star Trek, LOTR\Hobbit, Star Ship Troopers, Discworld are great and fun works but they are not "Mental\Spiritual\Philisophical\Humanistic Awakening" causing works.
They good, they will be around in 100 years for sure, but few if any are going to pick up the Hobbit and say 40 years later, "They day I picked up the Hobbit was the day my life truely changed for the better.
"Tolkien = Good, but so is Terry Brooks, Ann Mcaffery, Weis and Hickman, etc.I would in all honesty be more excited about a Shanara movie then the Hobbit.
I would also be more excited about winning $50 on a lottery scratch off.That is the problem as you get older, the underlying plots are all the same and it is harder and harder to not notice that long enough to enjoy the movie.
Like Avatar.... ZZzz.... Dances with Wolves in Space......I am actually more interested in the proposed sequel to the Hobbit then the movie.
I'd like to see something unexpected and new.
No matter what a movie cannot compare with a book (even a comic book to a degree) because you can set the pace, you control to a greater degree what the world looks like, etc.Just chill and try to enjoy the movie on it's own merits and if you can't, like me, rent and bitch about it at home and quit ruining the movie for those that can.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524116</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268933400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually TFA is wrong on that account. That was the original plan.<br>More recently they decided make a 2 part Hobbit film instead by filling in the gaps not mentioned in the book. Like e.g. what Gandalf was doing while he was gone etc.<br>Can't find where I originally read this but it's on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Hobbit\_(2011\_film)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">wikipedia</a> [wikipedia.org] too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually TFA is wrong on that account .
That was the original plan.More recently they decided make a 2 part Hobbit film instead by filling in the gaps not mentioned in the book .
Like e.g .
what Gandalf was doing while he was gone etc.Ca n't find where I originally read this but it 's on wikipedia [ wikipedia.org ] too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually TFA is wrong on that account.
That was the original plan.More recently they decided make a 2 part Hobbit film instead by filling in the gaps not mentioned in the book.
Like e.g.
what Gandalf was doing while he was gone etc.Can't find where I originally read this but it's on wikipedia [wikipedia.org] too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523934</id>
	<title>Kids book?</title>
	<author>currently\_awake</author>
	<datestamp>1268932560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Hobbit was definitely written for a younger crowd.  Of course once Hollywood gets through with it you won't know that- are they going for a younger crowd or what?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Hobbit was definitely written for a younger crowd .
Of course once Hollywood gets through with it you wo n't know that- are they going for a younger crowd or what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Hobbit was definitely written for a younger crowd.
Of course once Hollywood gets through with it you won't know that- are they going for a younger crowd or what?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523724</id>
	<title>Can't wait!</title>
	<author>Grench</author>
	<datestamp>1268931600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm very much looking forward to The Hobbit (very skeptical about the "original" sequel).</p><p>When I read the Lord of the Rings as a youngster, I was able to picture all the major scenes, and the characters, the locations... then to see Peter Jackson's films as an adult was just astonishing; they obviously had the same ideas as I had.</p><p>Yes, I know there were some differences between book and film (the Ring going to Osgiliath, and the omission of the Scouring of the Shire, in particular), but I still loved the films, and felt they were a lot more faithful to the original story than some other big budget Hollywood productions have been.</p><p>I hope the same is true for the Hobbit.  Any word on who will play Bilbo?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm very much looking forward to The Hobbit ( very skeptical about the " original " sequel ) .When I read the Lord of the Rings as a youngster , I was able to picture all the major scenes , and the characters , the locations... then to see Peter Jackson 's films as an adult was just astonishing ; they obviously had the same ideas as I had.Yes , I know there were some differences between book and film ( the Ring going to Osgiliath , and the omission of the Scouring of the Shire , in particular ) , but I still loved the films , and felt they were a lot more faithful to the original story than some other big budget Hollywood productions have been.I hope the same is true for the Hobbit .
Any word on who will play Bilbo ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm very much looking forward to The Hobbit (very skeptical about the "original" sequel).When I read the Lord of the Rings as a youngster, I was able to picture all the major scenes, and the characters, the locations... then to see Peter Jackson's films as an adult was just astonishing; they obviously had the same ideas as I had.Yes, I know there were some differences between book and film (the Ring going to Osgiliath, and the omission of the Scouring of the Shire, in particular), but I still loved the films, and felt they were a lot more faithful to the original story than some other big budget Hollywood productions have been.I hope the same is true for the Hobbit.
Any word on who will play Bilbo?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524698</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>BlueStraggler</author>
	<datestamp>1268936160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, Tolkien did tell us all the things that happened in those 60 years, so it's not like they are going to *completely* make it up. No matter how hard they tried, they couldn't come up with a better story, than, say, the recolonization and fall of Moria, or the fight against the Necromancer in Mirkwood. My money is on the former.  It will be called "Moria", and the tag line will be "They are coming..."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , Tolkien did tell us all the things that happened in those 60 years , so it 's not like they are going to * completely * make it up .
No matter how hard they tried , they could n't come up with a better story , than , say , the recolonization and fall of Moria , or the fight against the Necromancer in Mirkwood .
My money is on the former .
It will be called " Moria " , and the tag line will be " They are coming... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, Tolkien did tell us all the things that happened in those 60 years, so it's not like they are going to *completely* make it up.
No matter how hard they tried, they couldn't come up with a better story, than, say, the recolonization and fall of Moria, or the fight against the Necromancer in Mirkwood.
My money is on the former.
It will be called "Moria", and the tag line will be "They are coming..."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524660</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>furby076</author>
	<datestamp>1268935920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How is the above insightful? How is that poster anymore then a standard nay-saying fanboy?  The person is shooting down a sequel BEFORE it is even written let alone time for him to read it before it is filmed.<br> <br>

I swear we wonder how we get people in congress who shoot down ideas or pass retarded laws that make no sense - when they have no clue about the subject matter (e.g. IP, copyright, net neutrality, patents)....well don't wonder anymore - our local politicians are doing the same thing the OP is doing speaking before they know what the subject matter entails...</htmltext>
<tokenext>How is the above insightful ?
How is that poster anymore then a standard nay-saying fanboy ?
The person is shooting down a sequel BEFORE it is even written let alone time for him to read it before it is filmed .
I swear we wonder how we get people in congress who shoot down ideas or pass retarded laws that make no sense - when they have no clue about the subject matter ( e.g .
IP , copyright , net neutrality , patents ) ....well do n't wonder anymore - our local politicians are doing the same thing the OP is doing speaking before they know what the subject matter entails.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is the above insightful?
How is that poster anymore then a standard nay-saying fanboy?
The person is shooting down a sequel BEFORE it is even written let alone time for him to read it before it is filmed.
I swear we wonder how we get people in congress who shoot down ideas or pass retarded laws that make no sense - when they have no clue about the subject matter (e.g.
IP, copyright, net neutrality, patents)....well don't wonder anymore - our local politicians are doing the same thing the OP is doing speaking before they know what the subject matter entails...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31528080</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>Lunix Nutcase</author>
	<datestamp>1268904120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imagine if they paired up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine if they paired up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine if they paired up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524590</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>EkriirkE</author>
	<datestamp>1268935500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seeing as how Lucas is to be involved, there will be references to aliens and/or space ships featured prominently but loosely involved in the plot line.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seeing as how Lucas is to be involved , there will be references to aliens and/or space ships featured prominently but loosely involved in the plot line .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seeing as how Lucas is to be involved, there will be references to aliens and/or space ships featured prominently but loosely involved in the plot line.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524188</id>
	<title>Re:Oh yippy skippy</title>
	<author>IorDMUX</author>
	<datestamp>1268933760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Tolkien's brilliant timeless dialog</p></div><p>Are we referring to the same Tolkien, here?  If you read his books, you see that J.R.R. Tolkien was not much of a writer of dialogues or painter of characters.  What he <i>was</i>, though, was a designer of worlds of epic proportions.  Tolkien's Middle Earth is what made The Lord of the Rings what it is, not the banter of transient characters.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tolkien 's brilliant timeless dialogAre we referring to the same Tolkien , here ?
If you read his books , you see that J.R.R .
Tolkien was not much of a writer of dialogues or painter of characters .
What he was , though , was a designer of worlds of epic proportions .
Tolkien 's Middle Earth is what made The Lord of the Rings what it is , not the banter of transient characters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tolkien's brilliant timeless dialogAre we referring to the same Tolkien, here?
If you read his books, you see that J.R.R.
Tolkien was not much of a writer of dialogues or painter of characters.
What he was, though, was a designer of worlds of epic proportions.
Tolkien's Middle Earth is what made The Lord of the Rings what it is, not the banter of transient characters.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526218</id>
	<title>Re:May be too late.</title>
	<author>c++0xFF</author>
	<datestamp>1268942040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been amazed at how much younger actors can appear in a movie than in real life.  Watch some candid shots of actors at the Oscars; for some of them, the apparent age difference to the last film they shot is quite dramatic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been amazed at how much younger actors can appear in a movie than in real life .
Watch some candid shots of actors at the Oscars ; for some of them , the apparent age difference to the last film they shot is quite dramatic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been amazed at how much younger actors can appear in a movie than in real life.
Watch some candid shots of actors at the Oscars; for some of them, the apparent age difference to the last film they shot is quite dramatic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31632084</id>
	<title>Re:To quote the great Randall Graves</title>
	<author>makuabob</author>
	<datestamp>1269596460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Come on, now! Surely they will get into trouble at some point: then they will be running!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on , now !
Surely they will get into trouble at some point : then they will be running !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on, now!
Surely they will get into trouble at some point: then they will be running!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526508</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>bjk002</author>
	<datestamp>1268942880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like we can all expect Jar Jar to make an appearance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like we can all expect Jar Jar to make an appearance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like we can all expect Jar Jar to make an appearance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31534940</id>
	<title>Re:Too Old &amp; Wise To Be A Nerd</title>
	<author>giuda</author>
	<datestamp>1269005760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bilbo and Sam in Mount Doom?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bilbo and Sam in Mount Doom ?
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bilbo and Sam in Mount Doom?
:D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525830</id>
	<title>Author of the sequel</title>
	<author>GringoChapin</author>
	<datestamp>1268940840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If there must be a sequel, can we at least get someone competent to write it?  Is that Brandon Sanderson guy working on anything right now?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If there must be a sequel , can we at least get someone competent to write it ?
Is that Brandon Sanderson guy working on anything right now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If there must be a sequel, can we at least get someone competent to write it?
Is that Brandon Sanderson guy working on anything right now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525958</id>
	<title>Silmarillion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268941320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then I can be bored for only a few hours while watching it instead of the days it takes to read it?</p><p>Great.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then I can be bored for only a few hours while watching it instead of the days it takes to read it ? Great .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then I can be bored for only a few hours while watching it instead of the days it takes to read it?Great.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523910</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524212</id>
	<title>I ask only one thing...</title>
	<author>Kenja</author>
	<datestamp>1268933820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>please no singing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>please no singing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>please no singing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31626866</id>
	<title>Re:Brilliant timeless dialogue?</title>
	<author>alexo</author>
	<datestamp>1269620520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Like Sam wondering if his ennemy was really a bad man</p></div></blockquote><p>His ennemy was a real bad-ass.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Like Sam wondering if his ennemy was really a bad manHis ennemy was a real bad-ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like Sam wondering if his ennemy was really a bad manHis ennemy was a real bad-ass.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31527138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524294</id>
	<title>Because it's so easy</title>
	<author>Myrcutio</author>
	<datestamp>1268934120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That whole plot/dialog thing is so much simpler than the visual graphics right?  I mean heck, Shakespeare never had to deal with raycasting or aliasing, he had it EASY!</htmltext>
<tokenext>That whole plot/dialog thing is so much simpler than the visual graphics right ?
I mean heck , Shakespeare never had to deal with raycasting or aliasing , he had it EASY !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That whole plot/dialog thing is so much simpler than the visual graphics right?
I mean heck, Shakespeare never had to deal with raycasting or aliasing, he had it EASY!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525494</id>
	<title>Re:Oh yippy skippy</title>
	<author>Yunzil</author>
	<datestamp>1268939580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Oh joy, another visually stunning film with a disjointed script, mixing Tolkien's brilliant timeless dialog with flat modern drivel penned by Fran Walsh. </i></p><p>Fran Walsh is not the problem.  Philippa Boyens is.  She writes like a fan-girl who never grew up.</p><p><i>It wouldn't be so bad if they didn't screw up the plot and dialog so badly. </i></p><p>Such as?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh joy , another visually stunning film with a disjointed script , mixing Tolkien 's brilliant timeless dialog with flat modern drivel penned by Fran Walsh .
Fran Walsh is not the problem .
Philippa Boyens is .
She writes like a fan-girl who never grew up.It would n't be so bad if they did n't screw up the plot and dialog so badly .
Such as ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh joy, another visually stunning film with a disjointed script, mixing Tolkien's brilliant timeless dialog with flat modern drivel penned by Fran Walsh.
Fran Walsh is not the problem.
Philippa Boyens is.
She writes like a fan-girl who never grew up.It wouldn't be so bad if they didn't screw up the plot and dialog so badly.
Such as?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525216</id>
	<title>Re:ugh, sequel</title>
	<author>Impy the Impiuos Imp</author>
	<datestamp>1268938320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The sequel won't be too bad.  The Red Dragon will have turned out to have cast a dead man's hand spell on himself, and it will yank a soul to re-power his body and return him to life.  The soul will be a US Marine from Iraq, and the dragon will add his knowledge to his own, creating massive machine guns and basically flying around machine-gunning "the 5 armies", regardless of their orientation.</p><p>Later, the dragon will get ahold of the ring from Bilbo, and his own massive willpower will vie with Sauron for control.  Eventually, a group lead by Bilbo, containing Gollum, will recover the ring right as the marine fights back for control of the dragon's mind.  It's a hopeless effort, but stuns the dragon just briefly that they can pry the ring off using Sting.</p><p>Gollum, of course, then turns on Bilbo and tries to get it back, but the spirit of Thor Oakenshield or whoever croaked in Hobbit 1, I forget, intercedes and Bilbo escapes with the ring.</p><p>Epilogue decades later, when an older but not yet old Bilbo is present at the birth of his nephew, who "might be named Dodo, or maybe Frodo, I like that name!"  Cut to Sauron's area, where he's starting to build up an orc army, and negotiating with Saruman, while a middle-aged but youngish looking Grand Moff Tarken stands by as the massive tower with the eye is under construction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The sequel wo n't be too bad .
The Red Dragon will have turned out to have cast a dead man 's hand spell on himself , and it will yank a soul to re-power his body and return him to life .
The soul will be a US Marine from Iraq , and the dragon will add his knowledge to his own , creating massive machine guns and basically flying around machine-gunning " the 5 armies " , regardless of their orientation.Later , the dragon will get ahold of the ring from Bilbo , and his own massive willpower will vie with Sauron for control .
Eventually , a group lead by Bilbo , containing Gollum , will recover the ring right as the marine fights back for control of the dragon 's mind .
It 's a hopeless effort , but stuns the dragon just briefly that they can pry the ring off using Sting.Gollum , of course , then turns on Bilbo and tries to get it back , but the spirit of Thor Oakenshield or whoever croaked in Hobbit 1 , I forget , intercedes and Bilbo escapes with the ring.Epilogue decades later , when an older but not yet old Bilbo is present at the birth of his nephew , who " might be named Dodo , or maybe Frodo , I like that name !
" Cut to Sauron 's area , where he 's starting to build up an orc army , and negotiating with Saruman , while a middle-aged but youngish looking Grand Moff Tarken stands by as the massive tower with the eye is under construction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The sequel won't be too bad.
The Red Dragon will have turned out to have cast a dead man's hand spell on himself, and it will yank a soul to re-power his body and return him to life.
The soul will be a US Marine from Iraq, and the dragon will add his knowledge to his own, creating massive machine guns and basically flying around machine-gunning "the 5 armies", regardless of their orientation.Later, the dragon will get ahold of the ring from Bilbo, and his own massive willpower will vie with Sauron for control.
Eventually, a group lead by Bilbo, containing Gollum, will recover the ring right as the marine fights back for control of the dragon's mind.
It's a hopeless effort, but stuns the dragon just briefly that they can pry the ring off using Sting.Gollum, of course, then turns on Bilbo and tries to get it back, but the spirit of Thor Oakenshield or whoever croaked in Hobbit 1, I forget, intercedes and Bilbo escapes with the ring.Epilogue decades later, when an older but not yet old Bilbo is present at the birth of his nephew, who "might be named Dodo, or maybe Frodo, I like that name!
"  Cut to Sauron's area, where he's starting to build up an orc army, and negotiating with Saruman, while a middle-aged but youngish looking Grand Moff Tarken stands by as the massive tower with the eye is under construction.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524920</id>
	<title>To Be Faithful to the book...</title>
	<author>kenp2002</author>
	<datestamp>1268937060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will the perspective change 1/2 through the movie?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will the perspective change 1/2 through the movie ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will the perspective change 1/2 through the movie?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525416</id>
	<title>Re:Brilliant timeless dialogue?</title>
	<author>ColdWetDog</author>
	<datestamp>1268939340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Tolkien wrote dialogue? I thought his books were fantasy travelogues: descriptions of places, leaving places, walking through places, and arriving at other places. I don't remember much in the way of dialogue. I just remember lots of walking. Oh, and maybe a few spiders and a dragon or something.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Oh come on, how about:<br> <br>
Tim, Tim Benzedrine<br>
Hash, Boo, Valvoline<br>
Clean, Clean, Clean for Gene,<br>
First, Second, Neutral, Park<br>
Hi thee hence, you leafy narc!<br> <br>
Oops, waitaminute. Sorry.
<br> <br>
My Bad.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tolkien wrote dialogue ?
I thought his books were fantasy travelogues : descriptions of places , leaving places , walking through places , and arriving at other places .
I do n't remember much in the way of dialogue .
I just remember lots of walking .
Oh , and maybe a few spiders and a dragon or something .
Oh come on , how about : Tim , Tim Benzedrine Hash , Boo , Valvoline Clean , Clean , Clean for Gene , First , Second , Neutral , Park Hi thee hence , you leafy narc !
Oops , waitaminute .
Sorry . My Bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tolkien wrote dialogue?
I thought his books were fantasy travelogues: descriptions of places, leaving places, walking through places, and arriving at other places.
I don't remember much in the way of dialogue.
I just remember lots of walking.
Oh, and maybe a few spiders and a dragon or something.
Oh come on, how about: 
Tim, Tim Benzedrine
Hash, Boo, Valvoline
Clean, Clean, Clean for Gene,
First, Second, Neutral, Park
Hi thee hence, you leafy narc!
Oops, waitaminute.
Sorry.
 
My Bad.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523910</id>
	<title>Sequel? No, give us Silmarillion</title>
	<author>PHPNerd</author>
	<datestamp>1268932500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an original story not written by Tolkien, covering the 60 years between The Hobbit, and the Lord of the Rings."</p></div><p>A sequel NOT written by Tolkien? Ew. How about instead another prequel taken from The Silmarillion? That would be full of awesome, almost guaranteed to win several internets.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an original story not written by Tolkien , covering the 60 years between The Hobbit , and the Lord of the Rings .
" A sequel NOT written by Tolkien ?
Ew. How about instead another prequel taken from The Silmarillion ?
That would be full of awesome , almost guaranteed to win several internets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an original story not written by Tolkien, covering the 60 years between The Hobbit, and the Lord of the Rings.
"A sequel NOT written by Tolkien?
Ew. How about instead another prequel taken from The Silmarillion?
That would be full of awesome, almost guaranteed to win several internets.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524390</id>
	<title>As a massive faggot,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268934480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As a massive faggot, I quite enjoy the LOTR series. I suspect this is true of other gay ass nerds like myself! Thanks Tolkien!</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a massive faggot , I quite enjoy the LOTR series .
I suspect this is true of other gay ass nerds like myself !
Thanks Tolkien !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a massive faggot, I quite enjoy the LOTR series.
I suspect this is true of other gay ass nerds like myself!
Thanks Tolkien!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524996</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>hoggoth</author>
	<datestamp>1268937300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Comic: "I just flew in from LA, and boy are my arms tired. heh heh hah hah."<br>Wisnoskij: "Based on the morphological and kinematic data you would need significantly more lift than your arms could provide in order to fly."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Comic : " I just flew in from LA , and boy are my arms tired .
heh heh hah hah .
" Wisnoskij : " Based on the morphological and kinematic data you would need significantly more lift than your arms could provide in order to fly .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Comic: "I just flew in from LA, and boy are my arms tired.
heh heh hah hah.
"Wisnoskij: "Based on the morphological and kinematic data you would need significantly more lift than your arms could provide in order to fly.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524128</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>VJ42</author>
	<datestamp>1268933460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an *original story not written by Tolkien*, covering the 60 years between The Hobbit, and the Lord of the Rings."</p><p>Thanks but no thanks.</p></div><p>The summary is wrong, from TFA: <br> <br>"According to studio New Line, the first film will be an adaptation of The Hobbit, the novel Tolkien published before his Lord of the Rings cycle.<br>

The second will be an original story focusing on the 60 years between the book and the beginning of the Rings trilogy. "
<br>
<br>
So we're getting a hobbit movie AND a new story.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an * original story not written by Tolkien * , covering the 60 years between The Hobbit , and the Lord of the Rings .
" Thanks but no thanks.The summary is wrong , from TFA : " According to studio New Line , the first film will be an adaptation of The Hobbit , the novel Tolkien published before his Lord of the Rings cycle .
The second will be an original story focusing on the 60 years between the book and the beginning of the Rings trilogy .
" So we 're getting a hobbit movie AND a new story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an *original story not written by Tolkien*, covering the 60 years between The Hobbit, and the Lord of the Rings.
"Thanks but no thanks.The summary is wrong, from TFA:  "According to studio New Line, the first film will be an adaptation of The Hobbit, the novel Tolkien published before his Lord of the Rings cycle.
The second will be an original story focusing on the 60 years between the book and the beginning of the Rings trilogy.
"


So we're getting a hobbit movie AND a new story.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523722</id>
	<title>To quote the great Randall Graves</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1268931600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh jeez, MORE walking?!?!?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh jeez , MORE walking ? ! ? !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh jeez, MORE walking?!?!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524074</id>
	<title>Re:same actors for immortals?</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1268933160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That won't be a problem.  They can digitally youthen them by a decade without washing over the nuances of their performances.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That wo n't be a problem .
They can digitally youthen them by a decade without washing over the nuances of their performances .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That won't be a problem.
They can digitally youthen them by a decade without washing over the nuances of their performances.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523736</id>
	<title>same actors for immortals?</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1268931660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Gandalf, Elrond, Galadrial (she is not in book).
And Gollum too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gandalf , Elrond , Galadrial ( she is not in book ) .
And Gollum too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gandalf, Elrond, Galadrial (she is not in book).
And Gollum too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31527452</id>
	<title>Re:Hobbiton won't be ready</title>
	<author>RogerWilco</author>
	<datestamp>1268945640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was there too, about 2 months ago. I think they can do more than you think. Also they might not start with Hobbiton, leaving that to next summer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was there too , about 2 months ago .
I think they can do more than you think .
Also they might not start with Hobbiton , leaving that to next summer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was there too, about 2 months ago.
I think they can do more than you think.
Also they might not start with Hobbiton, leaving that to next summer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524618</id>
	<title>Re:I'll go ahead and be first</title>
	<author>laughing\_badger</author>
	<datestamp>1268935680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hamlet 2 <i>would</i> be 'inspired by Shakespeare'.
<p>
Personally, if they have found an interesting story to tell in the years between Hobbit and LotR, then I'm eager to hear it. If it is well worked into Tolkiens world, I'll be happy; if not, not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hamlet 2 would be 'inspired by Shakespeare' .
Personally , if they have found an interesting story to tell in the years between Hobbit and LotR , then I 'm eager to hear it .
If it is well worked into Tolkiens world , I 'll be happy ; if not , not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hamlet 2 would be 'inspired by Shakespeare'.
Personally, if they have found an interesting story to tell in the years between Hobbit and LotR, then I'm eager to hear it.
If it is well worked into Tolkiens world, I'll be happy; if not, not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712</id>
	<title>Sequel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268931540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an *original story not written by Tolkien*, covering the 60 years between The Hobbit, and the Lord of the Rings."</p><p>Thanks but no thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an * original story not written by Tolkien * , covering the 60 years between The Hobbit , and the Lord of the Rings .
" Thanks but no thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an *original story not written by Tolkien*, covering the 60 years between The Hobbit, and the Lord of the Rings.
"Thanks but no thanks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524574</id>
	<title>Re:I ask only one thing...</title>
	<author>CorporateSuit</author>
	<datestamp>1268935440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hear there will be no songs, but there is a very long ticklefight between Thorim and Bilbo that wasn't in the book.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hear there will be no songs , but there is a very long ticklefight between Thorim and Bilbo that was n't in the book .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hear there will be no songs, but there is a very long ticklefight between Thorim and Bilbo that wasn't in the book.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524234</id>
	<title>Not to be the Grammar Police....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268933880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an original story not written by Tolkien, covering the 60 years between The Hobbit, and the Lord of the Rings."
The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an original story, not written by Tolkien, covering the 60 years between The Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings.
Sorry but misplaced punctuation is like J-walking... A very serious offense.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an original story not written by Tolkien , covering the 60 years between The Hobbit , and the Lord of the Rings .
" The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an original story , not written by Tolkien , covering the 60 years between The Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings .
Sorry but misplaced punctuation is like J-walking... A very serious offense .
.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an original story not written by Tolkien, covering the 60 years between The Hobbit, and the Lord of the Rings.
"
The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an original story, not written by Tolkien, covering the 60 years between The Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings.
Sorry but misplaced punctuation is like J-walking... A very serious offense.
...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31538696</id>
	<title>TFS doesn't quote TFA correctly</title>
	<author>JCZwart</author>
	<datestamp>1269016680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, TFA says: "The second will be an original story focusing on the 60 years between the book and the beginning of the Rings trilogy. "</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , TFA says : " The second will be an original story focusing on the 60 years between the book and the beginning of the Rings trilogy .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, TFA says: "The second will be an original story focusing on the 60 years between the book and the beginning of the Rings trilogy.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31527138</id>
	<title>Re:Brilliant timeless dialogue?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268944680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just finished re-reading LoTR and you obviously forgot a *lot* of what is in the book (you're probably very old seen that 4 digit<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. ID<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>What *you* remember is description of places, leaving places, walking through places, and arriving at other places and not much in the way of dialogue.</p><p>Yet there are a *lot* of dialogues and "voice over" (I'm french, I don't know how you call this).  Like Sam wondering if his ennemy was really a bad man (which has been re-used verbatim in the movie, but they made Faramir say it for the "voice over" couldn't work in the movie).</p><p>There a lot of time where it describes the thoughts going to Frodo and Sam's minds.  The dialogues between Saruman and Frodo are *great*.  The ones between Merry and Theoden king... The ones between Eomer and Aragorn, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just finished re-reading LoTR and you obviously forgot a * lot * of what is in the book ( you 're probably very old seen that 4 digit / .
ID ; ) What * you * remember is description of places , leaving places , walking through places , and arriving at other places and not much in the way of dialogue.Yet there are a * lot * of dialogues and " voice over " ( I 'm french , I do n't know how you call this ) .
Like Sam wondering if his ennemy was really a bad man ( which has been re-used verbatim in the movie , but they made Faramir say it for the " voice over " could n't work in the movie ) .There a lot of time where it describes the thoughts going to Frodo and Sam 's minds .
The dialogues between Saruman and Frodo are * great * .
The ones between Merry and Theoden king... The ones between Eomer and Aragorn , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just finished re-reading LoTR and you obviously forgot a *lot* of what is in the book (you're probably very old seen that 4 digit /.
ID ;)What *you* remember is description of places, leaving places, walking through places, and arriving at other places and not much in the way of dialogue.Yet there are a *lot* of dialogues and "voice over" (I'm french, I don't know how you call this).
Like Sam wondering if his ennemy was really a bad man (which has been re-used verbatim in the movie, but they made Faramir say it for the "voice over" couldn't work in the movie).There a lot of time where it describes the thoughts going to Frodo and Sam's minds.
The dialogues between Saruman and Frodo are *great*.
The ones between Merry and Theoden king... The ones between Eomer and Aragorn, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524652</id>
	<title>Re:I'll go ahead and be first</title>
	<author>ThisIsAnonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268935920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Somehow humanity managed to move beyond Shakespeare, creating new-ish works which we prefer to his</p></div><p>There's only one response for this...WTF?  Perhaps you prefer The Da Vinci Code to Shakespeare...but not all of us do<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somehow humanity managed to move beyond Shakespeare , creating new-ish works which we prefer to hisThere 's only one response for this...WTF ?
Perhaps you prefer The Da Vinci Code to Shakespeare...but not all of us do : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somehow humanity managed to move beyond Shakespeare, creating new-ish works which we prefer to hisThere's only one response for this...WTF?
Perhaps you prefer The Da Vinci Code to Shakespeare...but not all of us do :D
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524846</id>
	<title>LOTR</title>
	<author>mxh83</author>
	<datestamp>1268936820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How many people here truly enjoyed TLOTR?  I, for one, cannot understand its appeal at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How many people here truly enjoyed TLOTR ?
I , for one , can not understand its appeal at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many people here truly enjoyed TLOTR?
I, for one, cannot understand its appeal at all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523940</id>
	<title>Two films?  Oh, right: There...</title>
	<author>Rogerborg</author>
	<datestamp>1268932560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Hobbit" title="wikipedia.org">and Back Again</a> [wikipedia.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>and Back Again [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and Back Again [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754</id>
	<title>Oh yippy skippy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268931780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh joy, another visually stunning film with a disjointed script, mixing Tolkien's brilliant timeless dialog with flat modern drivel penned by Fran Walsh.  And the sequel... that's just going to be visually stunning with drivel for plot and dialog.</p><p>
It wouldn't be so bad if they didn't screw up the plot and dialog so badly. Ugh.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh joy , another visually stunning film with a disjointed script , mixing Tolkien 's brilliant timeless dialog with flat modern drivel penned by Fran Walsh .
And the sequel... that 's just going to be visually stunning with drivel for plot and dialog .
It would n't be so bad if they did n't screw up the plot and dialog so badly .
Ugh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh joy, another visually stunning film with a disjointed script, mixing Tolkien's brilliant timeless dialog with flat modern drivel penned by Fran Walsh.
And the sequel... that's just going to be visually stunning with drivel for plot and dialog.
It wouldn't be so bad if they didn't screw up the plot and dialog so badly.
Ugh.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523990</id>
	<title>sequel?</title>
	<author>pieceofstone</author>
	<datestamp>1268932800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This sound wrong to me. The last I read was that the two movies would just be the Hobbit, broken into two but with some segments of the book expanded upon. I know there was talk earlier about a non-Hobbit sequel for the 2nd movie, but I don't think that's the way things stand right now unless things have changed again for some bizarre reason.
Okay, here's one link: <a href="http://www.aintitcool.com/node/41848" title="aintitcool.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.aintitcool.com/node/41848</a> [aintitcool.com]

"Where as many months ago, writers Jackson, Guillermo del Toro, Philippa Boyens, and Fran Walsh were contemplating the first films as essentially being the Tolkien book, and the second film being a bridge movie between THE HOBBIT and THE LORD OF THE RINGS, Jackson told a select group of online journalists a couple nights ago that that clearly wasn't going to be the case. The two films will be the novel stretched out and supplemented by material from appendices, and other background source material written by Tolkien."</htmltext>
<tokenext>This sound wrong to me .
The last I read was that the two movies would just be the Hobbit , broken into two but with some segments of the book expanded upon .
I know there was talk earlier about a non-Hobbit sequel for the 2nd movie , but I do n't think that 's the way things stand right now unless things have changed again for some bizarre reason .
Okay , here 's one link : http : //www.aintitcool.com/node/41848 [ aintitcool.com ] " Where as many months ago , writers Jackson , Guillermo del Toro , Philippa Boyens , and Fran Walsh were contemplating the first films as essentially being the Tolkien book , and the second film being a bridge movie between THE HOBBIT and THE LORD OF THE RINGS , Jackson told a select group of online journalists a couple nights ago that that clearly was n't going to be the case .
The two films will be the novel stretched out and supplemented by material from appendices , and other background source material written by Tolkien .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This sound wrong to me.
The last I read was that the two movies would just be the Hobbit, broken into two but with some segments of the book expanded upon.
I know there was talk earlier about a non-Hobbit sequel for the 2nd movie, but I don't think that's the way things stand right now unless things have changed again for some bizarre reason.
Okay, here's one link: http://www.aintitcool.com/node/41848 [aintitcool.com]

"Where as many months ago, writers Jackson, Guillermo del Toro, Philippa Boyens, and Fran Walsh were contemplating the first films as essentially being the Tolkien book, and the second film being a bridge movie between THE HOBBIT and THE LORD OF THE RINGS, Jackson told a select group of online journalists a couple nights ago that that clearly wasn't going to be the case.
The two films will be the novel stretched out and supplemented by material from appendices, and other background source material written by Tolkien.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31529182</id>
	<title>Re:Oh yippy skippy</title>
	<author>Blue Stone</author>
	<datestamp>1268907900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;Luckily for them, the source material will always be available for their enjoyment.</p><p>Bah, you'll never appreciate Tolkien's work until you've read it in the original Klingon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Luckily for them , the source material will always be available for their enjoyment.Bah , you 'll never appreciate Tolkien 's work until you 've read it in the original Klingon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;Luckily for them, the source material will always be available for their enjoyment.Bah, you'll never appreciate Tolkien's work until you've read it in the original Klingon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523720</id>
	<title>Hobbit sequel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268931600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an original story not written by Tolkien, covering the 60 years between The Hobbit, and the Lord of the Rings."</p></div></blockquote><p>Oh god, <i>that's</i> going to suck.  Can they get Uwe Boll to direct so as to remove all temptation to see it?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an original story not written by Tolkien , covering the 60 years between The Hobbit , and the Lord of the Rings .
" Oh god , that 's going to suck .
Can they get Uwe Boll to direct so as to remove all temptation to see it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The planned sequel to The Hobbit is to be an original story not written by Tolkien, covering the 60 years between The Hobbit, and the Lord of the Rings.
"Oh god, that's going to suck.
Can they get Uwe Boll to direct so as to remove all temptation to see it?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524194</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>dkf</author>
	<datestamp>1268933820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I heard George Lucas is writing it.</p></div><p>Could (just about) be worse. Uwe Boll is not involved in the project.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard George Lucas is writing it.Could ( just about ) be worse .
Uwe Boll is not involved in the project .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard George Lucas is writing it.Could (just about) be worse.
Uwe Boll is not involved in the project.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524626</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>Thanshin</author>
	<datestamp>1268935740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I heard George Lucas is writing it. Young Gollum will be a comedy character to lighten the mood. His appearance has been changed a bit to appeal to the 5-10 age range that have the most pester power over merchandise sales, e.g. big floppy bunny ears.</p> </div><p><div class="quote"><p> I believe that during that time is actually when [Young Gollum ] is being tortured in mordor</p></div><p>Change the name to "Jarjar does not simply walk into MORDOR!" and I'll pay to watch the movie in 3D.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard George Lucas is writing it .
Young Gollum will be a comedy character to lighten the mood .
His appearance has been changed a bit to appeal to the 5-10 age range that have the most pester power over merchandise sales , e.g .
big floppy bunny ears .
I believe that during that time is actually when [ Young Gollum ] is being tortured in mordorChange the name to " Jarjar does not simply walk into MORDOR !
" and I 'll pay to watch the movie in 3D .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard George Lucas is writing it.
Young Gollum will be a comedy character to lighten the mood.
His appearance has been changed a bit to appeal to the 5-10 age range that have the most pester power over merchandise sales, e.g.
big floppy bunny ears.
I believe that during that time is actually when [Young Gollum ] is being tortured in mordorChange the name to "Jarjar does not simply walk into MORDOR!
" and I'll pay to watch the movie in 3D.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31527194</id>
	<title>"Powerhouse" sequels are a good thing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268944860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry, but I just don't get all the pessimism.</p><p>It's been too long since we've had a widespread I-just-can't-wait-to-see-the-movie-and-its-sequel(s) phenomenon.  Peter Jackson pulled it off with LOTR.  And while he set the bar pretty darned high: His track record shows that he is up for the task.</p><p>I have high hopes.  But, even if the end result is a disappointment: at least we have another Star Trek is coming around the corner.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , but I just do n't get all the pessimism.It 's been too long since we 've had a widespread I-just-ca n't-wait-to-see-the-movie-and-its-sequel ( s ) phenomenon .
Peter Jackson pulled it off with LOTR .
And while he set the bar pretty darned high : His track record shows that he is up for the task.I have high hopes .
But , even if the end result is a disappointment : at least we have another Star Trek is coming around the corner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, but I just don't get all the pessimism.It's been too long since we've had a widespread I-just-can't-wait-to-see-the-movie-and-its-sequel(s) phenomenon.
Peter Jackson pulled it off with LOTR.
And while he set the bar pretty darned high: His track record shows that he is up for the task.I have high hopes.
But, even if the end result is a disappointment: at least we have another Star Trek is coming around the corner.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524126</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1268933460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Depends. Tolkien didn't flesh those years out much beyond a general timeline, so there's nothing for them to outright destroy. As long as they do enough research to stick with the general setting and history, it could work out well.</p><p>(I'm an optimist, I know.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Depends .
Tolkien did n't flesh those years out much beyond a general timeline , so there 's nothing for them to outright destroy .
As long as they do enough research to stick with the general setting and history , it could work out well .
( I 'm an optimist , I know .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depends.
Tolkien didn't flesh those years out much beyond a general timeline, so there's nothing for them to outright destroy.
As long as they do enough research to stick with the general setting and history, it could work out well.
(I'm an optimist, I know.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31527704</id>
	<title>Re:How about a Tim Burton-style franchise reboot?</title>
	<author>ryu1232</author>
	<datestamp>1268903100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds better than a Lucas reboot:<br>Indiana Jones has to trek across the galaxy looking for the one ring only to find out that Sauron is his father....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds better than a Lucas reboot : Indiana Jones has to trek across the galaxy looking for the one ring only to find out that Sauron is his father... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds better than a Lucas reboot:Indiana Jones has to trek across the galaxy looking for the one ring only to find out that Sauron is his father....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524242</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel? No, give us Silmarillion</title>
	<author>bughunter</author>
	<datestamp>1268933940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In theory, you're 100\% correct.  There's tons of material in <i>The Silmarillion</i> and the other early writings that are ideal for translation into screenplays... but there's two problems: 1) Licensing; the producers would have to pay even more money to Tolkein's estate; and 2) you can't fail by overestimating the American appetite for banality, but plenty of people have failed by overestimating their appetite for intelligence and depth.</p><p>You and I, as JRRT fans, would love to see a big screen representation of <i>The Fall of Numenor</i> or <i>The Tale of Beren and Luthien</i>.  These tales are the right length and the right level of complexity to permit a screenwriter plenty of artistic license and still remain faithful to Tolkein's originals.  But to a studio exec, those names aren't familiar.  They're only familiar to a nerds and geeks, and a minority of them at that, and they're notoriously hard to please and, even worse, known pirates and downloaders.</p><p>Nope.  The Hobbit has name recognition.  Kids in the 70's and 80's were given that book to read in 9th grade Lit classes.  Now those kids have money and their own kids.  They're going to milk that name for all it's worth.</p><p>I'll give del Toro the benefit of the doubt.  He earned that with <i>Pan's Labyrinth.</i>  But as soon as he shows signs of kowtowing to the studio execs and marketing pressures, I'm out.  It will happen, the question is how many movies will it take?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In theory , you 're 100 \ % correct .
There 's tons of material in The Silmarillion and the other early writings that are ideal for translation into screenplays... but there 's two problems : 1 ) Licensing ; the producers would have to pay even more money to Tolkein 's estate ; and 2 ) you ca n't fail by overestimating the American appetite for banality , but plenty of people have failed by overestimating their appetite for intelligence and depth.You and I , as JRRT fans , would love to see a big screen representation of The Fall of Numenor or The Tale of Beren and Luthien .
These tales are the right length and the right level of complexity to permit a screenwriter plenty of artistic license and still remain faithful to Tolkein 's originals .
But to a studio exec , those names are n't familiar .
They 're only familiar to a nerds and geeks , and a minority of them at that , and they 're notoriously hard to please and , even worse , known pirates and downloaders.Nope .
The Hobbit has name recognition .
Kids in the 70 's and 80 's were given that book to read in 9th grade Lit classes .
Now those kids have money and their own kids .
They 're going to milk that name for all it 's worth.I 'll give del Toro the benefit of the doubt .
He earned that with Pan 's Labyrinth .
But as soon as he shows signs of kowtowing to the studio execs and marketing pressures , I 'm out .
It will happen , the question is how many movies will it take ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In theory, you're 100\% correct.
There's tons of material in The Silmarillion and the other early writings that are ideal for translation into screenplays... but there's two problems: 1) Licensing; the producers would have to pay even more money to Tolkein's estate; and 2) you can't fail by overestimating the American appetite for banality, but plenty of people have failed by overestimating their appetite for intelligence and depth.You and I, as JRRT fans, would love to see a big screen representation of The Fall of Numenor or The Tale of Beren and Luthien.
These tales are the right length and the right level of complexity to permit a screenwriter plenty of artistic license and still remain faithful to Tolkein's originals.
But to a studio exec, those names aren't familiar.
They're only familiar to a nerds and geeks, and a minority of them at that, and they're notoriously hard to please and, even worse, known pirates and downloaders.Nope.
The Hobbit has name recognition.
Kids in the 70's and 80's were given that book to read in 9th grade Lit classes.
Now those kids have money and their own kids.
They're going to milk that name for all it's worth.I'll give del Toro the benefit of the doubt.
He earned that with Pan's Labyrinth.
But as soon as he shows signs of kowtowing to the studio execs and marketing pressures, I'm out.
It will happen, the question is how many movies will it take?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523910</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524938</id>
	<title>How is he going to handle the elves?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1268937120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Hobbit:<br>"Fa-la-la-lalley, welcome to the valley" dance</p><p>LoTR:<br>"We are all leaving and it's terrible sad" pout.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Hobbit : " Fa-la-la-lalley , welcome to the valley " danceLoTR : " We are all leaving and it 's terrible sad " pout .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Hobbit:"Fa-la-la-lalley, welcome to the valley" danceLoTR:"We are all leaving and it's terrible sad" pout.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523710</id>
	<title>ugh, sequel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268931480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm all for the creation and filming of The Hobbit, but I really don't know about the idea for that "sequel".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm all for the creation and filming of The Hobbit , but I really do n't know about the idea for that " sequel " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm all for the creation and filming of The Hobbit, but I really don't know about the idea for that "sequel".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524714</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel? No, give us Silmarillion</title>
	<author>furby076</author>
	<datestamp>1268936220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A sequel NOT written by Tolkien? Ew. How about instead another prequel taken from The Silmarillion? That would be full of awesome, almost guaranteed to win several internets.</p></div><p>Funny, your message and writing style seem remarkably like this guy <a href="http://entertainment.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1587392&amp;cid=31523770" title="slashdot.org">Copy</a> [slashdot.org]  So did you copy from this guy, or are you dual accounting?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A sequel NOT written by Tolkien ?
Ew. How about instead another prequel taken from The Silmarillion ?
That would be full of awesome , almost guaranteed to win several internets.Funny , your message and writing style seem remarkably like this guy Copy [ slashdot.org ] So did you copy from this guy , or are you dual accounting ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A sequel NOT written by Tolkien?
Ew. How about instead another prequel taken from The Silmarillion?
That would be full of awesome, almost guaranteed to win several internets.Funny, your message and writing style seem remarkably like this guy Copy [slashdot.org]  So did you copy from this guy, or are you dual accounting?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523910</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526046</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel? No, give us Silmarillion</title>
	<author>BoppreH</author>
	<datestamp>1268941620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>del Toro making movies about the stories from the Silmarillion. Seems like an excellent idea, but it might lose some of the awe. Reading about how beautiful the silmarils were, for example, is one thing, actually seeing them on the big screen is another. It's a very delicate path, but if done well, I would kill to see that movie.</htmltext>
<tokenext>del Toro making movies about the stories from the Silmarillion .
Seems like an excellent idea , but it might lose some of the awe .
Reading about how beautiful the silmarils were , for example , is one thing , actually seeing them on the big screen is another .
It 's a very delicate path , but if done well , I would kill to see that movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>del Toro making movies about the stories from the Silmarillion.
Seems like an excellent idea, but it might lose some of the awe.
Reading about how beautiful the silmarils were, for example, is one thing, actually seeing them on the big screen is another.
It's a very delicate path, but if done well, I would kill to see that movie.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524106</id>
	<title>May be too late.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268933340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Gandalf tells Bilbo he hasn't aged a day. He's celebrating his 111th birthday in the first movie.</p><p>And in the flashback, where Bilbo finds the ring, obviously Ian Holm looked pretty much the same as he did in Fellowship.</p><p>They should have made The Hobbit with Ian Holm a few years ago. Or at least scanned him in so we could AVATAR his performance into the movie, if the need arose.</p><p>Now, we'll have a movie with a different Bilbo, an older Aragorn, an older Gandalf... even an older Elrond.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gandalf tells Bilbo he has n't aged a day .
He 's celebrating his 111th birthday in the first movie.And in the flashback , where Bilbo finds the ring , obviously Ian Holm looked pretty much the same as he did in Fellowship.They should have made The Hobbit with Ian Holm a few years ago .
Or at least scanned him in so we could AVATAR his performance into the movie , if the need arose.Now , we 'll have a movie with a different Bilbo , an older Aragorn , an older Gandalf... even an older Elrond .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gandalf tells Bilbo he hasn't aged a day.
He's celebrating his 111th birthday in the first movie.And in the flashback, where Bilbo finds the ring, obviously Ian Holm looked pretty much the same as he did in Fellowship.They should have made The Hobbit with Ian Holm a few years ago.
Or at least scanned him in so we could AVATAR his performance into the movie, if the need arose.Now, we'll have a movie with a different Bilbo, an older Aragorn, an older Gandalf... even an older Elrond.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31528934</id>
	<title>Misleading title...</title>
	<author>Mysticalfruit</author>
	<datestamp>1268907000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hope they don't name it "The Hobbit" if it's going to deal with the 60 years between The Hobbit and LOTR.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope they do n't name it " The Hobbit " if it 's going to deal with the 60 years between The Hobbit and LOTR .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope they don't name it "The Hobbit" if it's going to deal with the 60 years between The Hobbit and LOTR.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524050</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>wisnoskij</author>
	<datestamp>1268933040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Young Gollum does not exist between The Hobbit and The Lord of the Ringd stories.
I believe that during that time is actually when he is being tortured in mordor (but that might be during the beginning of the LoTRs), among other things.
But either way, he is not comedy material. Not that I would put it past GL to destroy the spirit of Tolkien's work that much.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Young Gollum does not exist between The Hobbit and The Lord of the Ringd stories .
I believe that during that time is actually when he is being tortured in mordor ( but that might be during the beginning of the LoTRs ) , among other things .
But either way , he is not comedy material .
Not that I would put it past GL to destroy the spirit of Tolkien 's work that much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Young Gollum does not exist between The Hobbit and The Lord of the Ringd stories.
I believe that during that time is actually when he is being tortured in mordor (but that might be during the beginning of the LoTRs), among other things.
But either way, he is not comedy material.
Not that I would put it past GL to destroy the spirit of Tolkien's work that much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31529974</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1268911260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Thanks but no thanks.</i></p><p>Wait, aren't we supposed to be complaining that Hollywood is always remaking stuff, and that they should be coming up with original stories instead?</p><p>Then again, I saw Jackson's District 9.  If it was supposed to be a bad spoof movie, I guess it succeeded.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks but no thanks.Wait , are n't we supposed to be complaining that Hollywood is always remaking stuff , and that they should be coming up with original stories instead ? Then again , I saw Jackson 's District 9 .
If it was supposed to be a bad spoof movie , I guess it succeeded .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks but no thanks.Wait, aren't we supposed to be complaining that Hollywood is always remaking stuff, and that they should be coming up with original stories instead?Then again, I saw Jackson's District 9.
If it was supposed to be a bad spoof movie, I guess it succeeded.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524516</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>Angostura</author>
	<datestamp>1268935200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll wait and see - there's a tremendous amount of material that Tolkien wrote covering that period - various time lines, appendices, lost tales etc. If they do that material justice, it might be fun. Doesn't Gandalf get trapped in Sauron's old hang-out in Mirk Wood, apart from anything else?.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Gandalf and Jar Jar Binks, together at last!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll wait and see - there 's a tremendous amount of material that Tolkien wrote covering that period - various time lines , appendices , lost tales etc .
If they do that material justice , it might be fun .
Does n't Gandalf get trapped in Sauron 's old hang-out in Mirk Wood , apart from anything else ? .
... Gandalf and Jar Jar Binks , together at last !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll wait and see - there's a tremendous amount of material that Tolkien wrote covering that period - various time lines, appendices, lost tales etc.
If they do that material justice, it might be fun.
Doesn't Gandalf get trapped in Sauron's old hang-out in Mirk Wood, apart from anything else?.
... Gandalf and Jar Jar Binks, together at last!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525976</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268941380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>exsqueeze me...gollum...gollum.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>exsqueeze me...gollum...gollum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>exsqueeze me...gollum...gollum.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523840</id>
	<title>They can't just leave it alone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268932200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Imagine buying the White Album and finding Green Day tracks spliced in to 'fill in' what The Beatles meant to do.<br> <br>I don't think I'll see either of them out of principle.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine buying the White Album and finding Green Day tracks spliced in to 'fill in ' what The Beatles meant to do .
I do n't think I 'll see either of them out of principle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine buying the White Album and finding Green Day tracks spliced in to 'fill in' what The Beatles meant to do.
I don't think I'll see either of them out of principle.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526854</id>
	<title>Re:Brilliant timeless dialogue?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268943960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah read the books sometime, not the cliff notes version.  I guess you skimmed over the banter between Bilbo and Gandalf in the Hobbit....and prey tell what brilliant dialog was there in the movie....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah read the books sometime , not the cliff notes version .
I guess you skimmed over the banter between Bilbo and Gandalf in the Hobbit....and prey tell what brilliant dialog was there in the movie... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah read the books sometime, not the cliff notes version.
I guess you skimmed over the banter between Bilbo and Gandalf in the Hobbit....and prey tell what brilliant dialog was there in the movie....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523976</id>
	<title>Re:"The Hobbit" not "The Hobbit" ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268932800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, how can one name possibly refer to two different things?  Isn't language confusing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , how can one name possibly refer to two different things ?
Is n't language confusing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, how can one name possibly refer to two different things?
Isn't language confusing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526442</id>
	<title>Re:Hobbit sequel prediction</title>
	<author>DinDaddy</author>
	<datestamp>1268942760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The sequel will feature a new dragon, named Aesydrayne</p></div><p>Win!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The sequel will feature a new dragon , named AesydrayneWin !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The sequel will feature a new dragon, named AesydrayneWin!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525380</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel? No, give us Silmarillion</title>
	<author>c++0xFF</author>
	<datestamp>1268939100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>1) Licensing; the producers would have to pay even more money to Tolkein's estate;</p></div><p>The source is a 404 on Wikipedia now, but that seems to be one of the driving factors behind the second hobbit film:<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Hobbit\_(2011\_film)#Second\_film" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Hobbit\_(2011\_film)#Second\_film</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>They probably can't even reference many events as background material.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) Licensing ; the producers would have to pay even more money to Tolkein 's estate ; The source is a 404 on Wikipedia now , but that seems to be one of the driving factors behind the second hobbit film : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The \ _Hobbit \ _ ( 2011 \ _film ) # Second \ _film [ wikipedia.org ] They probably ca n't even reference many events as background material .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) Licensing; the producers would have to pay even more money to Tolkein's estate;The source is a 404 on Wikipedia now, but that seems to be one of the driving factors behind the second hobbit film:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Hobbit\_(2011\_film)#Second\_film [wikipedia.org]They probably can't even reference many events as background material.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524012</id>
	<title>better lotr sotry ideas:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268932860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Silmarillion" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Silmarillion</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>duh</p><p>it will be hard to nail tolkien's tone in a made up "middle movie". even if it isn't "studio committee of frat boys"ed to death, lotr fundamentalist fanboys will eviscerate it. they can deal with no tom bombadil, since its a story line that's so out of touch with the rest of lotr that it can safely be surgically removed, but whatever they do with the rumored necromancer plotline for this "middle movie" they better be damn respectful to the world of lotr:</p><p><a href="http://www.storyscape.net/hobbit\_necromancer.html" title="storyscape.net">http://www.storyscape.net/hobbit\_necromancer.html</a> [storyscape.net]</p><p>as an aside, i always thought a good jumping off point for lotr fanfiction/ hollywood exploitation would be an examination of the blue wizards:</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue\_Wizards" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue\_Wizards</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>so little is sketched by tolkien of them and the world to the east of mordor they went too, that it could make for some great lotr-type stories without stepping on any middle earth toes or the fanboys who guard the mythology's continuity</p><p>it could have an east asian or russian mythology theme, keeping in touch with all those maps that overlay mordor with either germany,  transylvania, or the middle east</p><p>and maybe we would get more oliphants!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The \ _Silmarillion [ wikipedia.org ] duhit will be hard to nail tolkien 's tone in a made up " middle movie " .
even if it is n't " studio committee of frat boys " ed to death , lotr fundamentalist fanboys will eviscerate it .
they can deal with no tom bombadil , since its a story line that 's so out of touch with the rest of lotr that it can safely be surgically removed , but whatever they do with the rumored necromancer plotline for this " middle movie " they better be damn respectful to the world of lotr : http : //www.storyscape.net/hobbit \ _necromancer.html [ storyscape.net ] as an aside , i always thought a good jumping off point for lotr fanfiction/ hollywood exploitation would be an examination of the blue wizards : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue \ _Wizards [ wikipedia.org ] so little is sketched by tolkien of them and the world to the east of mordor they went too , that it could make for some great lotr-type stories without stepping on any middle earth toes or the fanboys who guard the mythology 's continuityit could have an east asian or russian mythology theme , keeping in touch with all those maps that overlay mordor with either germany , transylvania , or the middle eastand maybe we would get more oliphants !
; -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Silmarillion [wikipedia.org]duhit will be hard to nail tolkien's tone in a made up "middle movie".
even if it isn't "studio committee of frat boys"ed to death, lotr fundamentalist fanboys will eviscerate it.
they can deal with no tom bombadil, since its a story line that's so out of touch with the rest of lotr that it can safely be surgically removed, but whatever they do with the rumored necromancer plotline for this "middle movie" they better be damn respectful to the world of lotr:http://www.storyscape.net/hobbit\_necromancer.html [storyscape.net]as an aside, i always thought a good jumping off point for lotr fanfiction/ hollywood exploitation would be an examination of the blue wizards:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue\_Wizards [wikipedia.org]so little is sketched by tolkien of them and the world to the east of mordor they went too, that it could make for some great lotr-type stories without stepping on any middle earth toes or the fanboys who guard the mythology's continuityit could have an east asian or russian mythology theme, keeping in touch with all those maps that overlay mordor with either germany,  transylvania, or the middle eastand maybe we would get more oliphants!
;-P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526410</id>
	<title>How To Prevent An Abysmal Sequal</title>
	<author>ChrTssu</author>
	<datestamp>1268942640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't see the abysmal original. Honestly, does The Hobbit need new characters? If it did, I'm sure Tolkien would have put them in - it's not like the guy was hurting for original characters.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't see the abysmal original .
Honestly , does The Hobbit need new characters ?
If it did , I 'm sure Tolkien would have put them in - it 's not like the guy was hurting for original characters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't see the abysmal original.
Honestly, does The Hobbit need new characters?
If it did, I'm sure Tolkien would have put them in - it's not like the guy was hurting for original characters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525038</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268937600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There was actually an unfinished work by tolkien himself, not to the tom bomba-whatever book included alot of shire related stories in it. There is some material about that they can use to flesh out the storie and make it consistant, not that they will...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There was actually an unfinished work by tolkien himself , not to the tom bomba-whatever book included alot of shire related stories in it .
There is some material about that they can use to flesh out the storie and make it consistant , not that they will.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was actually an unfinished work by tolkien himself, not to the tom bomba-whatever book included alot of shire related stories in it.
There is some material about that they can use to flesh out the storie and make it consistant, not that they will...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524006</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524596</id>
	<title>How about a Tim Burton-style franchise reboot?</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1268935560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can we get Tim Burton to direct, and make it a franchise reboot?</p><p>I can see it now: the hobbits living in an advanced society not unlike 21st century Europe undergo a genetic mutation as the result of exposure to radioactive volcanic ash. One of the hobbits becomes Lord Sauron, who proceeds to rise up and conquer the lands, forming an oppressive kingdom where he removes and monopolizes all modern technology. Society within that first generation regresses to a 10th-century-style existence.  Meanwhile, Lieutenant Starbuck, an astronaut who crashed on some faraway planet, helped the hobbits form a rag tag resistance group comprised of wookies, psychlo, and griffins, stumble across a cache of F-35 Lightning fighters, and although they have never seen so much as a flashlight or even matches, over the course of two weeks, become expert fighter pilots. Did I mention these F-35 Lightnings were not what they appeared, but are actually transformers, and in the bunker-style hangar they came across, there was a large semi. Well, the transformers were remaining covert to try to learn what all these strange creatures were up to since the creatures showed a barely perceptible spark of conscious thought. Optimus Prime took pity and he and his brothers revealed their true nature to the rag tag team. They agree to help the hobbits, psychlo, wookies, and griffins wage war to overthrow Sauron. The battle was quick and decisive.</p><p>Now for the Tim Burton twist ending: Glinda, the good witch told Lieutenant Starbuck "sorry man, but you have to go home now.  I'll service you first."  She gives him a BJ and tells him all he needs to do is to play the hokey pokey then he will be swiftly transported home. He does the hokey pokey, except he put is left foot in when he should have put in his right foot, so he landed in a parallel universe where the Earth is now ruled by giant tarantulas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we get Tim Burton to direct , and make it a franchise reboot ? I can see it now : the hobbits living in an advanced society not unlike 21st century Europe undergo a genetic mutation as the result of exposure to radioactive volcanic ash .
One of the hobbits becomes Lord Sauron , who proceeds to rise up and conquer the lands , forming an oppressive kingdom where he removes and monopolizes all modern technology .
Society within that first generation regresses to a 10th-century-style existence .
Meanwhile , Lieutenant Starbuck , an astronaut who crashed on some faraway planet , helped the hobbits form a rag tag resistance group comprised of wookies , psychlo , and griffins , stumble across a cache of F-35 Lightning fighters , and although they have never seen so much as a flashlight or even matches , over the course of two weeks , become expert fighter pilots .
Did I mention these F-35 Lightnings were not what they appeared , but are actually transformers , and in the bunker-style hangar they came across , there was a large semi .
Well , the transformers were remaining covert to try to learn what all these strange creatures were up to since the creatures showed a barely perceptible spark of conscious thought .
Optimus Prime took pity and he and his brothers revealed their true nature to the rag tag team .
They agree to help the hobbits , psychlo , wookies , and griffins wage war to overthrow Sauron .
The battle was quick and decisive.Now for the Tim Burton twist ending : Glinda , the good witch told Lieutenant Starbuck " sorry man , but you have to go home now .
I 'll service you first .
" She gives him a BJ and tells him all he needs to do is to play the hokey pokey then he will be swiftly transported home .
He does the hokey pokey , except he put is left foot in when he should have put in his right foot , so he landed in a parallel universe where the Earth is now ruled by giant tarantulas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we get Tim Burton to direct, and make it a franchise reboot?I can see it now: the hobbits living in an advanced society not unlike 21st century Europe undergo a genetic mutation as the result of exposure to radioactive volcanic ash.
One of the hobbits becomes Lord Sauron, who proceeds to rise up and conquer the lands, forming an oppressive kingdom where he removes and monopolizes all modern technology.
Society within that first generation regresses to a 10th-century-style existence.
Meanwhile, Lieutenant Starbuck, an astronaut who crashed on some faraway planet, helped the hobbits form a rag tag resistance group comprised of wookies, psychlo, and griffins, stumble across a cache of F-35 Lightning fighters, and although they have never seen so much as a flashlight or even matches, over the course of two weeks, become expert fighter pilots.
Did I mention these F-35 Lightnings were not what they appeared, but are actually transformers, and in the bunker-style hangar they came across, there was a large semi.
Well, the transformers were remaining covert to try to learn what all these strange creatures were up to since the creatures showed a barely perceptible spark of conscious thought.
Optimus Prime took pity and he and his brothers revealed their true nature to the rag tag team.
They agree to help the hobbits, psychlo, wookies, and griffins wage war to overthrow Sauron.
The battle was quick and decisive.Now for the Tim Burton twist ending: Glinda, the good witch told Lieutenant Starbuck "sorry man, but you have to go home now.
I'll service you first.
"  She gives him a BJ and tells him all he needs to do is to play the hokey pokey then he will be swiftly transported home.
He does the hokey pokey, except he put is left foot in when he should have put in his right foot, so he landed in a parallel universe where the Earth is now ruled by giant tarantulas.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31528166</id>
	<title>Re:Oh yippy skippy</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1268904360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>His writing, dialogue, plot development and pacing is atrocious.</p></div><p>Or maybe you're just not fan of the "high fantasy" writing style, where the language is deliberately complicated to make it look like some ancient epos?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>His writing , dialogue , plot development and pacing is atrocious.Or maybe you 're just not fan of the " high fantasy " writing style , where the language is deliberately complicated to make it look like some ancient epos ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>His writing, dialogue, plot development and pacing is atrocious.Or maybe you're just not fan of the "high fantasy" writing style, where the language is deliberately complicated to make it look like some ancient epos?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525538</id>
	<title>Too Old &amp; Wise To Be A Nerd</title>
	<author>pandrijeczko</author>
	<datestamp>1268939880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've read Lord Of The Rings a total of five times during my life (with a 6th read planned for soon), I've listen to the BBC audio adaptation several times and I played D&amp;D and Advanced D&amp;D for many years.</p><p>I saw the LOTR movies once at the cinema &amp; own the Special Edition movies which I've watched a few times - I'll even confess to shedding a quick tear when Boromir died (despite knowing it would happen) in Fellowship, when the Ents started moving in Towers, and when Bilbo and Sam were up on Mount Doom in Return.</p><p>I don't care that the films were not completely accurate to the books, they were a great adaptation that I thoroughly enjoyed &amp; that were hopefully easy enough on the general populace to hopefully have made them realise that fantasy tales don't all start &amp; end with Harry Potter.</p><p>Therefore I've decided that at 48 years of age, it's possible to care deeply about something you enjoy but that it's time to stop being too nerdy about stuff - after all, it's *JUST* entertainment, enjoy it &amp; feel a bit happier about things in general, or don't enjoy it &amp; go find something you do enjoy.</p><p>As a Star Trek fan, I was appalled 10 years ago when they started talking about a prequel movie or series to the original series, but I actually quite enjoyed Enterprise (as good as DS9 and better than Voyager) and thoroughly enjoyed the complete reboot of the franchise in the latest movie... bugger timelines, bugger proper adaptations, all that matters is whether or not I enjoyed it.</p><p>Sorry, kiddies, but when you get to my age a whole lot of stuff that used to seem really important now just gets in the way of you enjoying stuff that little bit more - so don't worry, you'll grow out of it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've read Lord Of The Rings a total of five times during my life ( with a 6th read planned for soon ) , I 've listen to the BBC audio adaptation several times and I played D&amp;D and Advanced D&amp;D for many years.I saw the LOTR movies once at the cinema &amp; own the Special Edition movies which I 've watched a few times - I 'll even confess to shedding a quick tear when Boromir died ( despite knowing it would happen ) in Fellowship , when the Ents started moving in Towers , and when Bilbo and Sam were up on Mount Doom in Return.I do n't care that the films were not completely accurate to the books , they were a great adaptation that I thoroughly enjoyed &amp; that were hopefully easy enough on the general populace to hopefully have made them realise that fantasy tales do n't all start &amp; end with Harry Potter.Therefore I 've decided that at 48 years of age , it 's possible to care deeply about something you enjoy but that it 's time to stop being too nerdy about stuff - after all , it 's * JUST * entertainment , enjoy it &amp; feel a bit happier about things in general , or do n't enjoy it &amp; go find something you do enjoy.As a Star Trek fan , I was appalled 10 years ago when they started talking about a prequel movie or series to the original series , but I actually quite enjoyed Enterprise ( as good as DS9 and better than Voyager ) and thoroughly enjoyed the complete reboot of the franchise in the latest movie... bugger timelines , bugger proper adaptations , all that matters is whether or not I enjoyed it.Sorry , kiddies , but when you get to my age a whole lot of stuff that used to seem really important now just gets in the way of you enjoying stuff that little bit more - so do n't worry , you 'll grow out of it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've read Lord Of The Rings a total of five times during my life (with a 6th read planned for soon), I've listen to the BBC audio adaptation several times and I played D&amp;D and Advanced D&amp;D for many years.I saw the LOTR movies once at the cinema &amp; own the Special Edition movies which I've watched a few times - I'll even confess to shedding a quick tear when Boromir died (despite knowing it would happen) in Fellowship, when the Ents started moving in Towers, and when Bilbo and Sam were up on Mount Doom in Return.I don't care that the films were not completely accurate to the books, they were a great adaptation that I thoroughly enjoyed &amp; that were hopefully easy enough on the general populace to hopefully have made them realise that fantasy tales don't all start &amp; end with Harry Potter.Therefore I've decided that at 48 years of age, it's possible to care deeply about something you enjoy but that it's time to stop being too nerdy about stuff - after all, it's *JUST* entertainment, enjoy it &amp; feel a bit happier about things in general, or don't enjoy it &amp; go find something you do enjoy.As a Star Trek fan, I was appalled 10 years ago when they started talking about a prequel movie or series to the original series, but I actually quite enjoyed Enterprise (as good as DS9 and better than Voyager) and thoroughly enjoyed the complete reboot of the franchise in the latest movie... bugger timelines, bugger proper adaptations, all that matters is whether or not I enjoyed it.Sorry, kiddies, but when you get to my age a whole lot of stuff that used to seem really important now just gets in the way of you enjoying stuff that little bit more - so don't worry, you'll grow out of it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523682</id>
	<title>The audition</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268931360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
I have visions of furries lined up for the audition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have visions of furries lined up for the audition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I have visions of furries lined up for the audition.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524376</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268934420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>People come down on Lucas for changing Star Wars, but Tolkien changed the Hobbit so he could use it as a prequel to The Lord of the Rings. Read "The Annotated Hobbit." Very interesting stuff.</htmltext>
<tokenext>People come down on Lucas for changing Star Wars , but Tolkien changed the Hobbit so he could use it as a prequel to The Lord of the Rings .
Read " The Annotated Hobbit .
" Very interesting stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People come down on Lucas for changing Star Wars, but Tolkien changed the Hobbit so he could use it as a prequel to The Lord of the Rings.
Read "The Annotated Hobbit.
" Very interesting stuff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526896</id>
	<title>Re:I'll go ahead and be first</title>
	<author>halber\_mensch</author>
	<datestamp>1268944080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yeah, there's a difference between making a modern adaptation of Shakespeare, or even a whole other thing INSPIRED by Shakespeare, and writing "Hamlet 2: The Revenge of the Prince!"</p></div><p>Yeah, the difference is <a href="http://focusfeatures.com/film/hamlet\_2" title="focusfeatures.com">Hamlet 2</a> [focusfeatures.com] has way more pyrotechnics. And Elizabeth Shue.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , there 's a difference between making a modern adaptation of Shakespeare , or even a whole other thing INSPIRED by Shakespeare , and writing " Hamlet 2 : The Revenge of the Prince !
" Yeah , the difference is Hamlet 2 [ focusfeatures.com ] has way more pyrotechnics .
And Elizabeth Shue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, there's a difference between making a modern adaptation of Shakespeare, or even a whole other thing INSPIRED by Shakespeare, and writing "Hamlet 2: The Revenge of the Prince!
"Yeah, the difference is Hamlet 2 [focusfeatures.com] has way more pyrotechnics.
And Elizabeth Shue.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525454</id>
	<title>Re:Sequel</title>
	<author>Yunzil</author>
	<datestamp>1268939460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Thanks but no thanks.</i></p><p>Really?  Why?</p><p>Tolkien's goal was to create a mythology.  His idea was that he would create the world and background and eventually other people would come along and fill in the details with more stories, poetry, music, whatever.  So a new story set in the period between The Hobbit and LotR is actually fulfilling Tolkien's vision for Middle Earth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks but no thanks.Really ?
Why ? Tolkien 's goal was to create a mythology .
His idea was that he would create the world and background and eventually other people would come along and fill in the details with more stories , poetry , music , whatever .
So a new story set in the period between The Hobbit and LotR is actually fulfilling Tolkien 's vision for Middle Earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks but no thanks.Really?
Why?Tolkien's goal was to create a mythology.
His idea was that he would create the world and background and eventually other people would come along and fill in the details with more stories, poetry, music, whatever.
So a new story set in the period between The Hobbit and LotR is actually fulfilling Tolkien's vision for Middle Earth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524636</id>
	<title>bluray</title>
	<author>furby076</author>
	<datestamp>1268935740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've been holding off on getting LOTR set for bluray until this came out.  I was wavering and even a week ago thought "maybe i should just buy it, there won't be a hobit movie"...glad to know my stubborness is paying off.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been holding off on getting LOTR set for bluray until this came out .
I was wavering and even a week ago thought " maybe i should just buy it , there wo n't be a hobit movie " ...glad to know my stubborness is paying off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been holding off on getting LOTR set for bluray until this came out.
I was wavering and even a week ago thought "maybe i should just buy it, there won't be a hobit movie"...glad to know my stubborness is paying off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526310</id>
	<title>Sequel not new</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268942400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think that this article is misinformed. I have read that this was the original intention to make the 2nd movie as a bridge between the Hobbit and LotR. But now I read that the 2 movies will be adapted both from the Hobbit and be one singular film but split into two.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that this article is misinformed .
I have read that this was the original intention to make the 2nd movie as a bridge between the Hobbit and LotR .
But now I read that the 2 movies will be adapted both from the Hobbit and be one singular film but split into two .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that this article is misinformed.
I have read that this was the original intention to make the 2nd movie as a bridge between the Hobbit and LotR.
But now I read that the 2 movies will be adapted both from the Hobbit and be one singular film but split into two.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523748</id>
	<title>Hobbit sequel prediction</title>
	<author>Junior J. Junior III</author>
	<datestamp>1268931720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The sequel will feature a new dragon, named Aesydrayne, and a battle involving six armies, and a ring that makes you completely odorless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The sequel will feature a new dragon , named Aesydrayne , and a battle involving six armies , and a ring that makes you completely odorless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The sequel will feature a new dragon, named Aesydrayne, and a battle involving six armies, and a ring that makes you completely odorless.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524780</id>
	<title>Re:I'll go ahead and be first</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268936520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pretty much what you said is the argument for why copyrights need to stop being extended.  Especially after the authors death.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty much what you said is the argument for why copyrights need to stop being extended .
Especially after the authors death .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty much what you said is the argument for why copyrights need to stop being extended.
Especially after the authors death.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525728</id>
	<title>Re:I'll go ahead and be first</title>
	<author>newdsfornerds</author>
	<datestamp>1268940540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I nominate Neil Gaiman.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I nominate Neil Gaiman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I nominate Neil Gaiman.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523728</id>
	<title>Summary is wrong ...</title>
	<author>krou</author>
	<datestamp>1268931600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I commented on the post in the Firehose after I submitted it, but the summary should've said "... is scheduled to begin in <b>July</b><nobr> <wbr></nobr>..." instead of June.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I commented on the post in the Firehose after I submitted it , but the summary should 've said " ... is scheduled to begin in July ... " instead of June .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I commented on the post in the Firehose after I submitted it, but the summary should've said "... is scheduled to begin in July ..." instead of June.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524528</id>
	<title>Sequel, Space-hobbits</title>
	<author>u64</author>
	<datestamp>1268935200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I noticed a few wind-mills in the Trilogy so they could expand that and invent<br>steam-power and so on, and begin an industrial era.<br>And later on the hobbits invent cars. And computers and begins an<br>MiddleEarth Information Age. Then we get to follow thier progress when they invent<br>space-travel and begin exploring thier galaxy! Where they explore strange new worlds,<br>and civilizations. To boldly go, where no hobbit/human/wizard/elf/dwarf/ent/etc<br>have never gone before! And then, finally we get to see how they discover the science<br>behind all the fracking magic... No?</p><p>Speaking of Fantasy, LoTR/Starwars crossover would work. Both are Fantasy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I noticed a few wind-mills in the Trilogy so they could expand that and inventsteam-power and so on , and begin an industrial era.And later on the hobbits invent cars .
And computers and begins anMiddleEarth Information Age .
Then we get to follow thier progress when they inventspace-travel and begin exploring thier galaxy !
Where they explore strange new worlds,and civilizations .
To boldly go , where no hobbit/human/wizard/elf/dwarf/ent/etchave never gone before !
And then , finally we get to see how they discover the sciencebehind all the fracking magic... No ? Speaking of Fantasy , LoTR/Starwars crossover would work .
Both are Fantasy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I noticed a few wind-mills in the Trilogy so they could expand that and inventsteam-power and so on, and begin an industrial era.And later on the hobbits invent cars.
And computers and begins anMiddleEarth Information Age.
Then we get to follow thier progress when they inventspace-travel and begin exploring thier galaxy!
Where they explore strange new worlds,and civilizations.
To boldly go, where no hobbit/human/wizard/elf/dwarf/ent/etchave never gone before!
And then, finally we get to see how they discover the sciencebehind all the fracking magic... No?Speaking of Fantasy, LoTR/Starwars crossover would work.
Both are Fantasy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523972</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31632084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524618
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31527704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525976
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31529974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31533332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31538696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524128
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31529182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523936
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524636
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31527956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523976
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31534940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31528080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524376
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31528098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31527194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524290
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524528
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31527030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31527452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524574
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31534148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31530704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31534118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31527138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31626866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524294
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31528166
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525826
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31532790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_18_158238_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523720
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523910
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524242
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526046
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525380
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524390
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524212
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524574
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523712
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524594
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31529974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31527194
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523848
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524590
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31532790
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524376
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524194
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31528080
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524050
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524626
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524996
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31530704
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525146
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524128
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524006
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31538696
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524234
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524938
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526332
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524012
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525890
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524290
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523754
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524152
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31528166
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31534148
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524070
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526854
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31533332
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525628
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31527138
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31626866
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31534118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525494
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524294
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524480
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31529182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523968
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525826
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524636
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523824
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31632084
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525216
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526768
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524074
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31527956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523976
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31534940
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525200
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31527452
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523748
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526442
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524436
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523728
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525356
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31527704
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31523972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524144
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31528098
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524618
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31526896
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525638
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31525728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31527030
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_18_158238.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_18_158238.31524276
</commentlist>
</conversation>
