<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_17_210251</id>
	<title>Complex Life Found Under 600 Feet of Antarctic Ice</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1268818380000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Chroniton writes <i>"NASA ice scientists have found a shrimp-like creature and a possible jellyfish <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100315/ap\_on\_sc/us\_sci\_antarctica\_sea\_life">'frolicking' beneath 600 feet of solid Antarctic ice</a>, where only microbes were expected to live.  The odds of finding two complex lifeforms after drilling only an 8-inch-wide hole suggests there may be much more.  And if such life is possible beneath Earth's oceans, why not elsewhere, like Europa?"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chroniton writes " NASA ice scientists have found a shrimp-like creature and a possible jellyfish 'frolicking ' beneath 600 feet of solid Antarctic ice , where only microbes were expected to live .
The odds of finding two complex lifeforms after drilling only an 8-inch-wide hole suggests there may be much more .
And if such life is possible beneath Earth 's oceans , why not elsewhere , like Europa ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chroniton writes "NASA ice scientists have found a shrimp-like creature and a possible jellyfish 'frolicking' beneath 600 feet of solid Antarctic ice, where only microbes were expected to live.
The odds of finding two complex lifeforms after drilling only an 8-inch-wide hole suggests there may be much more.
And if such life is possible beneath Earth's oceans, why not elsewhere, like Europa?
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516936</id>
	<title>Re:Europa?</title>
	<author>chill</author>
	<datestamp>1268828580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is so sad it doesn't even deserve a "whoosh".  Just go out and rent 2010.  <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086837/" title="imdb.com">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086837/</a> [imdb.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is so sad it does n't even deserve a " whoosh " .
Just go out and rent 2010. http : //www.imdb.com/title/tt0086837/ [ imdb.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is so sad it doesn't even deserve a "whoosh".
Just go out and rent 2010.  http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086837/ [imdb.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516478</id>
	<title>Re:Europa?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268825580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The real question should be if the Shrimp and the Jelly Fish were "frolicking" together or separately.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The real question should be if the Shrimp and the Jelly Fish were " frolicking " together or separately .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real question should be if the Shrimp and the Jelly Fish were "frolicking" together or separately.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515906</id>
	<title>Shoggoths</title>
	<author>Gothmolly</author>
	<datestamp>1268822940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Didn't we learn from Lovecraft?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/waiting for the Del Toro movie...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't we learn from Lovecraft ?
/waiting for the Del Toro movie.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't we learn from Lovecraft?
/waiting for the Del Toro movie...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31521208</id>
	<title>Re:Surely nuclear subs have been there?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268918820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>nuclear submarines don't have windows.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>nuclear submarines do n't have windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nuclear submarines don't have windows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518340</id>
	<title>Re:Because Earth already has a proven Ecosystem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268839800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Europa could have bacterial life, but nothing more intelligent than that.<br>Oh, sorry we are taking about the continent or the planet?.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Europa could have bacterial life , but nothing more intelligent than that.Oh , sorry we are taking about the continent or the planet ? .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Europa could have bacterial life, but nothing more intelligent than that.Oh, sorry we are taking about the continent or the planet?.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515702</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31519394</id>
	<title>Avatar :P</title>
	<author>madhusudancs</author>
	<datestamp>1268850540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>like Pandora?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</htmltext>
<tokenext>like Pandora ?
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>like Pandora?
:D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31525800</id>
	<title>Re:Oceans too</title>
	<author>LuminaireX</author>
	<datestamp>1268940780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally,a use for hellajoules.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally,a use for hellajoules .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally,a use for hellajoules.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31554370</id>
	<title>Re:600 feet, 8 inch...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269097440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>One should expect that at least NASA has arrived in the 21st century while the rest of the country still uses medieval units....</p></div></blockquote><p>They don't, but do you really expect them to use metric in a press release to be read by the rest of the country?  Know your audience!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One should expect that at least NASA has arrived in the 21st century while the rest of the country still uses medieval units....They do n't , but do you really expect them to use metric in a press release to be read by the rest of the country ?
Know your audience !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One should expect that at least NASA has arrived in the 21st century while the rest of the country still uses medieval units....They don't, but do you really expect them to use metric in a press release to be read by the rest of the country?
Know your audience!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31562550</id>
	<title>Re:I doubt this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1269183300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dearly beloved, there is no specific, explicit mention in the Bible of God making puppies, dogs, kittens, cats, lynxes, bobcats, tigers, guinea pigs, horned toads, or most assorted others of the varieties of aquatic, land-based, etc. life forms, either, but they exist and nobody I know can actually prove, or disprove, by legally competent evidence, using either "scientific" or "legal" evidence and proof, the answers to a lot of my questions about life, including how it, or the raw materials thereof, came to exist.</p><p>A lawyer colleague of mine was doing some legal research on cattle leasing and discovered that, in the language of the King James version of the Bible, and of a temporal legal case decided by the British House of Lords, some members of which worked on that translation of the Bible, the term rendered "cattle" referred to animals the offspring of which were referred to as "lambs,"   There are some life forms referred to in the Bible that I think we can identify today, but nowhere is there anything purporting to be a complete catalog of life forms, species, organisms, creatures, mutations, or whatever you want to call them.</p><p>Biology is not my field of expertise.  Viruses do evolve into diferent viruses.  I can conceive of microscopic life or fossils thereof being introduced into an actual or alleged environment accidentally, but living shrimp-like organisms, etc., 600 feet down in the sea, would appear most likely to belong there rather than having been accidentally introduced by NASA oceanographic scientists as one poster posited here.   One undoubtedly brilliant actual or alleged scientist pronounced solemnly that he had discovered life that had evolved at Mt. St. Helens as a result of the explosion in 1980.  I have always suspected that another leading atheist evolutionary scientist was kidding when he was quoted hypothesizing that life on earth got here via meteorite, although a major news magazine reported this straight-faced as scientific probability.   My personal favorite was the article in the New York Times quoting experts referring to "junk DNA" in the human genome left over from something, which they omitted to mention in a later article noting the discovery that said string of "junk" DNA was "crucial to the formation of the heart."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dearly beloved , there is no specific , explicit mention in the Bible of God making puppies , dogs , kittens , cats , lynxes , bobcats , tigers , guinea pigs , horned toads , or most assorted others of the varieties of aquatic , land-based , etc .
life forms , either , but they exist and nobody I know can actually prove , or disprove , by legally competent evidence , using either " scientific " or " legal " evidence and proof , the answers to a lot of my questions about life , including how it , or the raw materials thereof , came to exist.A lawyer colleague of mine was doing some legal research on cattle leasing and discovered that , in the language of the King James version of the Bible , and of a temporal legal case decided by the British House of Lords , some members of which worked on that translation of the Bible , the term rendered " cattle " referred to animals the offspring of which were referred to as " lambs , " There are some life forms referred to in the Bible that I think we can identify today , but nowhere is there anything purporting to be a complete catalog of life forms , species , organisms , creatures , mutations , or whatever you want to call them.Biology is not my field of expertise .
Viruses do evolve into diferent viruses .
I can conceive of microscopic life or fossils thereof being introduced into an actual or alleged environment accidentally , but living shrimp-like organisms , etc. , 600 feet down in the sea , would appear most likely to belong there rather than having been accidentally introduced by NASA oceanographic scientists as one poster posited here .
One undoubtedly brilliant actual or alleged scientist pronounced solemnly that he had discovered life that had evolved at Mt .
St. Helens as a result of the explosion in 1980 .
I have always suspected that another leading atheist evolutionary scientist was kidding when he was quoted hypothesizing that life on earth got here via meteorite , although a major news magazine reported this straight-faced as scientific probability .
My personal favorite was the article in the New York Times quoting experts referring to " junk DNA " in the human genome left over from something , which they omitted to mention in a later article noting the discovery that said string of " junk " DNA was " crucial to the formation of the heart .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dearly beloved, there is no specific, explicit mention in the Bible of God making puppies, dogs, kittens, cats, lynxes, bobcats, tigers, guinea pigs, horned toads, or most assorted others of the varieties of aquatic, land-based, etc.
life forms, either, but they exist and nobody I know can actually prove, or disprove, by legally competent evidence, using either "scientific" or "legal" evidence and proof, the answers to a lot of my questions about life, including how it, or the raw materials thereof, came to exist.A lawyer colleague of mine was doing some legal research on cattle leasing and discovered that, in the language of the King James version of the Bible, and of a temporal legal case decided by the British House of Lords, some members of which worked on that translation of the Bible, the term rendered "cattle" referred to animals the offspring of which were referred to as "lambs,"   There are some life forms referred to in the Bible that I think we can identify today, but nowhere is there anything purporting to be a complete catalog of life forms, species, organisms, creatures, mutations, or whatever you want to call them.Biology is not my field of expertise.
Viruses do evolve into diferent viruses.
I can conceive of microscopic life or fossils thereof being introduced into an actual or alleged environment accidentally, but living shrimp-like organisms, etc., 600 feet down in the sea, would appear most likely to belong there rather than having been accidentally introduced by NASA oceanographic scientists as one poster posited here.
One undoubtedly brilliant actual or alleged scientist pronounced solemnly that he had discovered life that had evolved at Mt.
St. Helens as a result of the explosion in 1980.
I have always suspected that another leading atheist evolutionary scientist was kidding when he was quoted hypothesizing that life on earth got here via meteorite, although a major news magazine reported this straight-faced as scientific probability.
My personal favorite was the article in the New York Times quoting experts referring to "junk DNA" in the human genome left over from something, which they omitted to mention in a later article noting the discovery that said string of "junk" DNA was "crucial to the formation of the heart.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517292</id>
	<title>Whoops...</title>
	<author>oljanx</author>
	<datestamp>1268830980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This was an accident that occurred on the fifth day.  Also Europa was a trial run.  Pay no attention to the unspeakable horrors that lay beneath it's icy surface.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This was an accident that occurred on the fifth day .
Also Europa was a trial run .
Pay no attention to the unspeakable horrors that lay beneath it 's icy surface .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was an accident that occurred on the fifth day.
Also Europa was a trial run.
Pay no attention to the unspeakable horrors that lay beneath it's icy surface.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516258</id>
	<title>Re:only problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268824440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Life can live in ice-covered oceans and it can even be complex. This is all idle speculation until someone actually probes Europa to see what's under there.</p></div><p>I just had this image in my head of humans building a colony on Mars, then ET's come by and say <i>"Whoah! This means sentient life could have evolved on barren worlds like Mars!"</i></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Life can live in ice-covered oceans and it can even be complex .
This is all idle speculation until someone actually probes Europa to see what 's under there.I just had this image in my head of humans building a colony on Mars , then ET 's come by and say " Whoah !
This means sentient life could have evolved on barren worlds like Mars !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Life can live in ice-covered oceans and it can even be complex.
This is all idle speculation until someone actually probes Europa to see what's under there.I just had this image in my head of humans building a colony on Mars, then ET's come by and say "Whoah!
This means sentient life could have evolved on barren worlds like Mars!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515978</id>
	<title>Re:only problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268823240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're going to point out that Europa is different from Antartica at least take the time to point out how it's different.  Namely, the complex life in Antarctica evolved in different, more comfortable conditions.  Complex life under hundreds of feet of ice on Earth says nothing about whether or not it's possible for life to begin or become complex in those conditions.  It just says that once started, life is very adaptable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're going to point out that Europa is different from Antartica at least take the time to point out how it 's different .
Namely , the complex life in Antarctica evolved in different , more comfortable conditions .
Complex life under hundreds of feet of ice on Earth says nothing about whether or not it 's possible for life to begin or become complex in those conditions .
It just says that once started , life is very adaptable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're going to point out that Europa is different from Antartica at least take the time to point out how it's different.
Namely, the complex life in Antarctica evolved in different, more comfortable conditions.
Complex life under hundreds of feet of ice on Earth says nothing about whether or not it's possible for life to begin or become complex in those conditions.
It just says that once started, life is very adaptable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516098</id>
	<title>Teekk&#252;rler Janlarm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268823780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <a href="http://www.trsohbetlive.com/" title="trsohbetlive.com" rel="nofollow">sohbet</a> [trsohbetlive.com] </p><p>


ee abi sonra ne ie yararki bu buzlar felan ne yapolar oralarda bu adamlar amck amck i yapmasnlar s&#246;leyin.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>sohbet [ trsohbetlive.com ] ee abi sonra ne ie yararki bu buzlar felan ne yapolar oralarda bu adamlar amck amck i yapmasnlar s   leyin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> sohbet [trsohbetlive.com] 


ee abi sonra ne ie yararki bu buzlar felan ne yapolar oralarda bu adamlar amck amck i yapmasnlar söleyin.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515930</id>
	<title>Re:Oceans too</title>
	<author>mrsteveman1</author>
	<datestamp>1268823060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do the fish look like aliens, or do aliens look like <i>fish</i>?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do the fish look like aliens , or do aliens look like fish ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do the fish look like aliens, or do aliens look like fish?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517792</id>
	<title>Re:Oceans too</title>
	<author>rossdee</author>
	<datestamp>1268834880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imagine the sun becoming a red giant in a billion years or two. Its what astrophysicists expect anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine the sun becoming a red giant in a billion years or two .
Its what astrophysicists expect anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine the sun becoming a red giant in a billion years or two.
Its what astrophysicists expect anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515870</id>
	<title>There is a misspelling...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268822760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The amphipod is actually a <em>Lysianassid</em>, not a Lyssianasid, if someone tries to google it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The amphipod is actually a Lysianassid , not a Lyssianasid , if someone tries to google it : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The amphipod is actually a Lysianassid, not a Lyssianasid, if someone tries to google it :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515720</id>
	<title>I doubt this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268822220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A more likely explanation is that the samples were contaminated by the instruments. If we look in the Bible there is no mention that God made this lifeform, therefore the most logical explanation is contamination.</p><p>Sorry to burst your bubble.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A more likely explanation is that the samples were contaminated by the instruments .
If we look in the Bible there is no mention that God made this lifeform , therefore the most logical explanation is contamination.Sorry to burst your bubble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A more likely explanation is that the samples were contaminated by the instruments.
If we look in the Bible there is no mention that God made this lifeform, therefore the most logical explanation is contamination.Sorry to burst your bubble.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517622</id>
	<title>Video Footage</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268833620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouZkkIsLiNg" title="youtube.com">video</a> [youtube.com]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's the video [ youtube.com ] ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's the video [youtube.com] ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516036</id>
	<title>"All these worlds are yours,</title>
	<author>Animaether</author>
	<datestamp>1268823420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>except Europa. Attempt no landings there."<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and as far as I can tell from wikipedia, it seems 'we' haven't yet?  No landers, no hurling things into the surface to see what gets thrown up, no nothing... just flyby missions. hmm..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>except Europa .
Attempt no landings there .
" ... and as far as I can tell from wikipedia , it seems 'we ' have n't yet ?
No landers , no hurling things into the surface to see what gets thrown up , no nothing... just flyby missions .
hmm. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>except Europa.
Attempt no landings there.
" ... and as far as I can tell from wikipedia, it seems 'we' haven't yet?
No landers, no hurling things into the surface to see what gets thrown up, no nothing... just flyby missions.
hmm..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516364</id>
	<title>Re:Europa?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268825040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thought the first American continent colonizers came from the West, not the East.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thought the first American continent colonizers came from the West , not the East .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thought the first American continent colonizers came from the West, not the East.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517516</id>
	<title>Complex life...</title>
	<author>Labarna</author>
	<datestamp>1268832780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You mean there is an imaginary component?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean there is an imaginary component ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean there is an imaginary component?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517398</id>
	<title>Re:Did you mean...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268831820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Um, no....Lysianassidae is the correct term for the actual family of amphipods; lysianassid would be the correct term for a member of that family, kinda like how the name of our family is Hominidae but we are called hominids.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , no....Lysianassidae is the correct term for the actual family of amphipods ; lysianassid would be the correct term for a member of that family , kinda like how the name of our family is Hominidae but we are called hominids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, no....Lysianassidae is the correct term for the actual family of amphipods; lysianassid would be the correct term for a member of that family, kinda like how the name of our family is Hominidae but we are called hominids.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516336</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516266</id>
	<title>Not likely</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268824500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've looked - yes it's damn cold, but I didn't find any signs of complex life.</p><p>(Ps: You misspelt Europe)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've looked - yes it 's damn cold , but I did n't find any signs of complex life .
( Ps : You misspelt Europe )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've looked - yes it's damn cold, but I didn't find any signs of complex life.
(Ps: You misspelt Europe)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515926</id>
	<title>Re:Oceans too</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1268823060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Imagine the land amount all those oceans would free if dried up.</p><p>Imagine all the land that would become uninhabitable if the oceans dried up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Imagine the land amount all those oceans would free if dried up.Imagine all the land that would become uninhabitable if the oceans dried up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Imagine the land amount all those oceans would free if dried up.Imagine all the land that would become uninhabitable if the oceans dried up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515790</id>
	<title>Re:Europa?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268822460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I thought we were not allowed to explore Europa?</p></div><p>You are aware that those Yuropeeins discovered America, right?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought we were not allowed to explore Europa ? You are aware that those Yuropeeins discovered America , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought we were not allowed to explore Europa?You are aware that those Yuropeeins discovered America, right?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31519992</id>
	<title>Re:There is a misspelling...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268903820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The amphipod is actually a <em>Lysianassid</em>, not a Lyssianasid, if someone tries to google it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div><p>You read the article AND googled for something you read in it!?  Get off<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. you heretic!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The amphipod is actually a Lysianassid , not a Lyssianasid , if someone tries to google it : ) You read the article AND googled for something you read in it ! ?
Get off / .
you heretic !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The amphipod is actually a Lysianassid, not a Lyssianasid, if someone tries to google it :)You read the article AND googled for something you read in it!?
Get off /.
you heretic!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518450</id>
	<title>Re:Surely nuclear subs have been there?</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1268840940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ice is a poruis material.  If theres water under it, it wicks up into the ice, carrying life with it before it freezes solid.  This happens constantly, forming new ice over time and spreading out.  As such, ice shelves over the open ocean almost certainly are teaming with various forms of life that can survive at least short term in those conditions.  Its not uncommon at all.</p><p>600 feet in ice with no easily available source of large quanties of energy (as we think of energy needed to sustain life)  and the fact that it takes a REALLY LONG TIME to get buried 600 feet into an ice sheet on land means its not new life, its been there for many generations of the organism.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ice is a poruis material .
If theres water under it , it wicks up into the ice , carrying life with it before it freezes solid .
This happens constantly , forming new ice over time and spreading out .
As such , ice shelves over the open ocean almost certainly are teaming with various forms of life that can survive at least short term in those conditions .
Its not uncommon at all.600 feet in ice with no easily available source of large quanties of energy ( as we think of energy needed to sustain life ) and the fact that it takes a REALLY LONG TIME to get buried 600 feet into an ice sheet on land means its not new life , its been there for many generations of the organism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ice is a poruis material.
If theres water under it, it wicks up into the ice, carrying life with it before it freezes solid.
This happens constantly, forming new ice over time and spreading out.
As such, ice shelves over the open ocean almost certainly are teaming with various forms of life that can survive at least short term in those conditions.
Its not uncommon at all.600 feet in ice with no easily available source of large quanties of energy (as we think of energy needed to sustain life)  and the fact that it takes a REALLY LONG TIME to get buried 600 feet into an ice sheet on land means its not new life, its been there for many generations of the organism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515976</id>
	<title>Note to Explorers!</title>
	<author>BobMcD</author>
	<datestamp>1268823240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's apparently more Earth left to see!  Before we venture to Mars, lets go look under this ice.  The environment is a lot friendlier, comparatively speaking, and there's less distance to cross before we arrive!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's apparently more Earth left to see !
Before we venture to Mars , lets go look under this ice .
The environment is a lot friendlier , comparatively speaking , and there 's less distance to cross before we arrive !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's apparently more Earth left to see!
Before we venture to Mars, lets go look under this ice.
The environment is a lot friendlier, comparatively speaking, and there's less distance to cross before we arrive!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516432</id>
	<title>Re:Europa?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268825400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's funny when Eurotrash tries to make an American look uneducated and only succeeds in revealing their own lack of culture.</p><p>Here's a hint: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010:\_Odyssey\_Two" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010:\_Odyssey\_Two</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's funny when Eurotrash tries to make an American look uneducated and only succeeds in revealing their own lack of culture.Here 's a hint : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010 : \ _Odyssey \ _Two [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's funny when Eurotrash tries to make an American look uneducated and only succeeds in revealing their own lack of culture.Here's a hint: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010:\_Odyssey\_Two [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515916</id>
	<title>Beneath the oceans?</title>
	<author>psYchotic87</author>
	<datestamp>1268822940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And if such life is possible beneath Earth's oceans, why not elsewhere, like Europa?</p></div><p>
I don't get it, how exactly do you get from "600 feet under solid Antarctic ice" to "beneath Earth's oceans"?
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And if such life is possible beneath Earth 's oceans , why not elsewhere , like Europa ?
I do n't get it , how exactly do you get from " 600 feet under solid Antarctic ice " to " beneath Earth 's oceans " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if such life is possible beneath Earth's oceans, why not elsewhere, like Europa?
I don't get it, how exactly do you get from "600 feet under solid Antarctic ice" to "beneath Earth's oceans"?

	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516656</id>
	<title>Re:There is a misspelling...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268826660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're acting as if anyone actually cared!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're acting as if anyone actually cared !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're acting as if anyone actually cared!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31521100</id>
	<title>Re:Oceans too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268917980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Depends I presume on how many aliens have you been cooking by now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Depends I presume on how many aliens have you been cooking by now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depends I presume on how many aliens have you been cooking by now?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31519858</id>
	<title>Europa this, europa that.</title>
	<author>Jazzbunny</author>
	<datestamp>1268944980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder why people always talk about possible life on Europa although for layman like me Ganymede seems better candidate: It's big as a planet, less radiation than Europa, molten iron core, water ocean, magnetosphere. All the good stuff and less of the bad.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder why people always talk about possible life on Europa although for layman like me Ganymede seems better candidate : It 's big as a planet , less radiation than Europa , molten iron core , water ocean , magnetosphere .
All the good stuff and less of the bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder why people always talk about possible life on Europa although for layman like me Ganymede seems better candidate: It's big as a planet, less radiation than Europa, molten iron core, water ocean, magnetosphere.
All the good stuff and less of the bad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515952</id>
	<title>Heed HAL's warning</title>
	<author>uvsc\_wolverine</author>
	<datestamp>1268823180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"All these worlds are yours except Europa.  Attempt no landings there.  Use them together.  Use them in peace."
<br>
<br>
I mean Arthur C. Clarke must've known something.  Another science fiction author unraveled the meaning of existence and we all know that L. Ron Hubbard is 100\% right (for those of you with broken sarcasm detectors, I'm kidding), so Clarke must be at least as brilliant since he was a better writer!</htmltext>
<tokenext>" All these worlds are yours except Europa .
Attempt no landings there .
Use them together .
Use them in peace .
" I mean Arthur C. Clarke must 've known something .
Another science fiction author unraveled the meaning of existence and we all know that L. Ron Hubbard is 100 \ % right ( for those of you with broken sarcasm detectors , I 'm kidding ) , so Clarke must be at least as brilliant since he was a better writer !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"All these worlds are yours except Europa.
Attempt no landings there.
Use them together.
Use them in peace.
"


I mean Arthur C. Clarke must've known something.
Another science fiction author unraveled the meaning of existence and we all know that L. Ron Hubbard is 100\% right (for those of you with broken sarcasm detectors, I'm kidding), so Clarke must be at least as brilliant since he was a better writer!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31519420</id>
	<title>Frakking shrimps</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268851020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So the shrimps in District 9 IS a distinct possible alien life form.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So the shrimps in District 9 IS a distinct possible alien life form .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the shrimps in District 9 IS a distinct possible alien life form.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516336</id>
	<title>Did you mean...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268824860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The amphipod is actually a Lysianassid, not a Lyssianasid, if someone tries to google it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</i></p><p>Now you <b>lysian</b>, here you <b>ass id</b>.  People don't like pedantics, especially when they're wrong.</p><p>The correct word is <b>Lysianassidae</b>.  The <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=Lysianassid&amp;btnG=Search" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">Mighty Oracle of Mountain View</a> [google.com] told me so. And do not demur, lest you anger it and incur its wrath.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The amphipod is actually a Lysianassid , not a Lyssianasid , if someone tries to google it : ) Now you lysian , here you ass id .
People do n't like pedantics , especially when they 're wrong.The correct word is Lysianassidae .
The Mighty Oracle of Mountain View [ google.com ] told me so .
And do not demur , lest you anger it and incur its wrath .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The amphipod is actually a Lysianassid, not a Lyssianasid, if someone tries to google it :)Now you lysian, here you ass id.
People don't like pedantics, especially when they're wrong.The correct word is Lysianassidae.
The Mighty Oracle of Mountain View [google.com] told me so.
And do not demur, lest you anger it and incur its wrath.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31519194</id>
	<title>Re:Oceans too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268847840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>O noes, global warming is goonna dries up teh oceans!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>O noes , global warming is goonna dries up teh oceans !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>O noes, global warming is goonna dries up teh oceans!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517534</id>
	<title>600 feet, 8 inch...</title>
	<author>Mojo66</author>
	<datestamp>1268833020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>One should expect that at least NASA has arrived in the 21st century while the rest of the country still uses medieval units....</htmltext>
<tokenext>One should expect that at least NASA has arrived in the 21st century while the rest of the country still uses medieval units... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One should expect that at least NASA has arrived in the 21st century while the rest of the country still uses medieval units....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516034</id>
	<title>Re:The real question.</title>
	<author>PolygamousRanchKid </author>
	<datestamp>1268823420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, if you're really interested . . . here's a place that will serve it up for you:
</p><p>http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/03/15/california.whale.meat.apology/?hpt=T2
</p><p>Straight up, or on the rocks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if you 're really interested .
. .
here 's a place that will serve it up for you : http : //www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/03/15/california.whale.meat.apology/ ? hpt = T2 Straight up , or on the rocks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if you're really interested .
. .
here's a place that will serve it up for you:
http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/03/15/california.whale.meat.apology/?hpt=T2
Straight up, or on the rocks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516316</id>
	<title>Surely nuclear subs have been there?</title>
	<author>CdBee</author>
	<datestamp>1268824800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I understand that Nuclear submarines have been under the North polar ice cap many times, surely someone's sent one under the Southern ice sheets by now? Obviously the continent would get in the way of going too far under but even so.....
<br> <br>
I wonder if the relevant governments would be willing to release confirmatory data.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I understand that Nuclear submarines have been under the North polar ice cap many times , surely someone 's sent one under the Southern ice sheets by now ?
Obviously the continent would get in the way of going too far under but even so.... . I wonder if the relevant governments would be willing to release confirmatory data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I understand that Nuclear submarines have been under the North polar ice cap many times, surely someone's sent one under the Southern ice sheets by now?
Obviously the continent would get in the way of going too far under but even so.....
 
I wonder if the relevant governments would be willing to release confirmatory data.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31530162</id>
	<title>Re:Oceans too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268912280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If God can flood all the land, he can unflood all the oceans.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If God can flood all the land , he can unflood all the oceans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If God can flood all the land, he can unflood all the oceans.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517192</id>
	<title>Re:Oceans too</title>
	<author>pclminion</author>
	<datestamp>1268830320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imagine the impossibility of the oceans drying up.</p><p>For the ocean to "dry up" the water would have to be removed from the planet. That requires two energy inputs: first, enough energy to boil all the water in all the oceans. Second, enough energy to raise the velocity of each molecule of water vapor to the escape velocity.</p><p>I won't bother calculating the energy required to reach escape velocity, but the energy required just to boil the oceans into water vapor is around 3e27 J. Using another value I calculated earlier this morning, this is the equivalent of moving the moon's orbit outward by more than 15,000 km. Or, it would be like directing the entire energy output of the sun (not just the fraction of it which hits the Earth) into the oceans for ten seconds. It's a HUGE amount of energy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine the impossibility of the oceans drying up.For the ocean to " dry up " the water would have to be removed from the planet .
That requires two energy inputs : first , enough energy to boil all the water in all the oceans .
Second , enough energy to raise the velocity of each molecule of water vapor to the escape velocity.I wo n't bother calculating the energy required to reach escape velocity , but the energy required just to boil the oceans into water vapor is around 3e27 J. Using another value I calculated earlier this morning , this is the equivalent of moving the moon 's orbit outward by more than 15,000 km .
Or , it would be like directing the entire energy output of the sun ( not just the fraction of it which hits the Earth ) into the oceans for ten seconds .
It 's a HUGE amount of energy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine the impossibility of the oceans drying up.For the ocean to "dry up" the water would have to be removed from the planet.
That requires two energy inputs: first, enough energy to boil all the water in all the oceans.
Second, enough energy to raise the velocity of each molecule of water vapor to the escape velocity.I won't bother calculating the energy required to reach escape velocity, but the energy required just to boil the oceans into water vapor is around 3e27 J. Using another value I calculated earlier this morning, this is the equivalent of moving the moon's orbit outward by more than 15,000 km.
Or, it would be like directing the entire energy output of the sun (not just the fraction of it which hits the Earth) into the oceans for ten seconds.
It's a HUGE amount of energy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31526098</id>
	<title>Re:Europa?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268941740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You are aware that those Yuropeeins discovered America, right?</p></div><p>behold, someone on slashdot who has never seen 2010!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You are aware that those Yuropeeins discovered America , right ? behold , someone on slashdot who has never seen 2010 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are aware that those Yuropeeins discovered America, right?behold, someone on slashdot who has never seen 2010!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515984</id>
	<title>extreme depth</title>
	<author>Mantis8</author>
	<datestamp>1268823240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "6' under".</htmltext>
<tokenext>This brings a whole new meaning to the phrase " 6 ' under " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "6' under".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31531178</id>
	<title>Norwegian sciencetists are laughing their asses of</title>
	<author>maggern</author>
	<datestamp>1268918460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not sure if this has been posted before. <br>
Norwegian sciencetists have been studying these creatures for 30 years. This according Norway's biggest newspaper "Verdens gang". (vg.no)<br> <br>

Original in Norwegian:<br>
<a href="http://www.vg.no/nyheter/utenriks/artikkel.php?artid=591795" title="www.vg.no" rel="nofollow">http://www.vg.no/nyheter/utenriks/artikkel.php?artid=591795</a> [www.vg.no] <br> <br>

Translated:<br>
<a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&amp;prev=\_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;layout=1&amp;eotf=1&amp;u=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.vg.no\%2Fnyheter\%2Futenriks\%2Fartikkel.php\%3Fartid\%3D591795&amp;sl=no&amp;tl=en" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&amp;prev=\_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;layout=1&amp;eotf=1&amp;u=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.vg.no\%2Fnyheter\%2Futenriks\%2Fartikkel.php\%3Fartid\%3D591795&amp;sl=no&amp;tl=en</a> [google.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not sure if this has been posted before .
Norwegian sciencetists have been studying these creatures for 30 years .
This according Norway 's biggest newspaper " Verdens gang " .
( vg.no ) Original in Norwegian : http : //www.vg.no/nyheter/utenriks/artikkel.php ? artid = 591795 [ www.vg.no ] Translated : http : //translate.google.com/translate ? js = y&amp;prev = \ _t&amp;hl = en&amp;ie = UTF-8&amp;layout = 1&amp;eotf = 1&amp;u = http \ % 3A \ % 2F \ % 2Fwww.vg.no \ % 2Fnyheter \ % 2Futenriks \ % 2Fartikkel.php \ % 3Fartid \ % 3D591795&amp;sl = no&amp;tl = en [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not sure if this has been posted before.
Norwegian sciencetists have been studying these creatures for 30 years.
This according Norway's biggest newspaper "Verdens gang".
(vg.no) 

Original in Norwegian:
http://www.vg.no/nyheter/utenriks/artikkel.php?artid=591795 [www.vg.no]  

Translated:
http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&amp;prev=\_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;layout=1&amp;eotf=1&amp;u=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.vg.no\%2Fnyheter\%2Futenriks\%2Fartikkel.php\%3Fartid\%3D591795&amp;sl=no&amp;tl=en [google.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515742</id>
	<title>Europa?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268822280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought we were not allowed to explore Europa?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought we were not allowed to explore Europa ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought we were not allowed to explore Europa?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31529580</id>
	<title>Re:Europa?</title>
	<author>dotancohen</author>
	<datestamp>1268909460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/terminology.png" title="xkcd.com">http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/terminology.png</a> [xkcd.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //imgs.xkcd.com/comics/terminology.png [ xkcd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/terminology.png [xkcd.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515974</id>
	<title>More Than Microbes In Antarctica</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268823240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nazis established a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bt8kE5UUYAQ&amp;feature=related" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">base</a> [youtube.com] in Antarctica.</p><p>Yours In Ufa,<br>Kilgore Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nazis established a base [ youtube.com ] in Antarctica.Yours In Ufa,Kilgore Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nazis established a base [youtube.com] in Antarctica.Yours In Ufa,Kilgore Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516094</id>
	<title>Re:only problem</title>
	<author>linzeal</author>
	<datestamp>1268823720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The question is where did life evolve first in the solar system or did it evolve somewhere else first and was transported here.  If panspermia is correct and life can be transported over past the ISM between star systems it is likely any place in the galaxy that is hit by this ' stuff ' will have life.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The question is where did life evolve first in the solar system or did it evolve somewhere else first and was transported here .
If panspermia is correct and life can be transported over past the ISM between star systems it is likely any place in the galaxy that is hit by this ' stuff ' will have life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The question is where did life evolve first in the solar system or did it evolve somewhere else first and was transported here.
If panspermia is correct and life can be transported over past the ISM between star systems it is likely any place in the galaxy that is hit by this ' stuff ' will have life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31521094</id>
	<title>Do Not Go Down There!</title>
	<author>TheFakeMcCoy</author>
	<datestamp>1268917980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If movies teach us anything, that's not a jelly fish tenticle, it's face hugger, and those little shrimp are mostly likey baby xenomorph's. Leading me to belive that the pedator hunters are out pissing around in the artcic again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If movies teach us anything , that 's not a jelly fish tenticle , it 's face hugger , and those little shrimp are mostly likey baby xenomorph 's .
Leading me to belive that the pedator hunters are out pissing around in the artcic again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If movies teach us anything, that's not a jelly fish tenticle, it's face hugger, and those little shrimp are mostly likey baby xenomorph's.
Leading me to belive that the pedator hunters are out pissing around in the artcic again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31519158</id>
	<title>Cthulu?</title>
	<author>j33px0r</author>
	<datestamp>1268847480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Great....we alerted one of his minions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Great....we alerted one of his minions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great....we alerted one of his minions.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517148</id>
	<title>complex life under antartica?  Don't believe it !!</title>
	<author>fregare</author>
	<datestamp>1268830020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have yet to meet to meet an intelligent life from on this planet and yet you claim that there are complex life forms under Antarctica?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have yet to meet to meet an intelligent life from on this planet and yet you claim that there are complex life forms under Antarctica ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have yet to meet to meet an intelligent life from on this planet and yet you claim that there are complex life forms under Antarctica?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516630</id>
	<title>Re:Oceans too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268826420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how that jellyfish crawled out of the primortial soup and evolved under the arctic ice.</p><p>i also wonder how it . . . came from a rock</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how that jellyfish crawled out of the primortial soup and evolved under the arctic ice.i also wonder how it .
. .
came from a rock</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how that jellyfish crawled out of the primortial soup and evolved under the arctic ice.i also wonder how it .
. .
came from a rock</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516114</id>
	<title>Europa</title>
	<author>schnitzi</author>
	<datestamp>1268823780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;And if such life is possible beneath Earth's oceans, why not elsewhere, like Europa?</p><p>Because saying life can survive somewhere is different than saying it can evolve somewhere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; And if such life is possible beneath Earth 's oceans , why not elsewhere , like Europa ? Because saying life can survive somewhere is different than saying it can evolve somewhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;And if such life is possible beneath Earth's oceans, why not elsewhere, like Europa?Because saying life can survive somewhere is different than saying it can evolve somewhere.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517100</id>
	<title>Why not just x-ray Europa?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268829720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And be done with it?</p><p>Put it between a pulsar or quasar or even set off a supernova behind it and use the x-rays from that to see what's inside of Europa.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And be done with it ? Put it between a pulsar or quasar or even set off a supernova behind it and use the x-rays from that to see what 's inside of Europa .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And be done with it?Put it between a pulsar or quasar or even set off a supernova behind it and use the x-rays from that to see what's inside of Europa.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516538</id>
	<title>Re:Oceans too</title>
	<author>trouser</author>
	<datestamp>1268825880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So how do you know what aliens look like anyway?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So how do you know what aliens look like anyway ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So how do you know what aliens look like anyway?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31522180</id>
	<title>ALL THESE WORLDS...</title>
	<author>old\_skul</author>
	<datestamp>1268924040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>,,,are yours except Europa. Attempt no landings there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>,,,are yours except Europa .
Attempt no landings there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>,,,are yours except Europa.
Attempt no landings there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806</id>
	<title>only problem</title>
	<author>khallow</author>
	<datestamp>1268822460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And if such life is possible beneath Earth's oceans, why not elsewhere, like Europa?</p></div><p>Because Europa is not Antarctica. We get it. Life can live in ice-covered oceans and it can even be complex. This is all idle speculation until someone actually probes Europa to see what's under there.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And if such life is possible beneath Earth 's oceans , why not elsewhere , like Europa ? Because Europa is not Antarctica .
We get it .
Life can live in ice-covered oceans and it can even be complex .
This is all idle speculation until someone actually probes Europa to see what 's under there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if such life is possible beneath Earth's oceans, why not elsewhere, like Europa?Because Europa is not Antarctica.
We get it.
Life can live in ice-covered oceans and it can even be complex.
This is all idle speculation until someone actually probes Europa to see what's under there.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31521272</id>
	<title>Re:Not likely</title>
	<author>phision</author>
	<datestamp>1268919300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you try hard enough you may find complex life in Europe. As for the intelligent life... lost cause</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you try hard enough you may find complex life in Europe .
As for the intelligent life... lost cause</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you try hard enough you may find complex life in Europe.
As for the intelligent life... lost cause</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516930</id>
	<title>maybe</title>
	<author>Spaham</author>
	<datestamp>1268828520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>because it migrated there and didn't evolve there in parallel ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>because it migrated there and did n't evolve there in parallel ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because it migrated there and didn't evolve there in parallel ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518420</id>
	<title>Re:Oceans too</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1268840700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doubtful.</p><p>It might become uninhabitable to the existing life forms that live there, but you utterly failed to get the point of this discovery.</p><p>Life exists in lots of places and ways that we thought weren't possible.</p><p>Its really silly to much such an absolute statement as yours.  If the oceans 'dried up' whatever that actually means then life may die out, but its more likely it would continue on in another form.  Just like the life 30k under the surface of the ocean in volcanic vents, 600 feet down in ice, or high altitude lakes that would kill anything you would be able to recognize right off the start as life without a microscope.</p><p>We know life changes, species come, evolve, and die out, but observation of the past tells us that regardless of what extreme situation happens to the planet, some life form somewhere survives and carries on to repopulate based on the new environment.</p><p>Really, from a scientific perspective, we have as much evidence that life on earth can cease to exist as we have evidence that gravity can be turned off.  We've never observed either of those situations directly, but I agree life on Earth ceasing to exist is entirely possible.</p><p>I also think you have a lack of appreciate for life's ability to survive thanks to its diversity.  We nor anything else is going to 'destroy life on Earth' at any point in time that we're going to find relevant.</p><p>Human life or life as we know it may end, something will carry on and evolve to survive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Doubtful.It might become uninhabitable to the existing life forms that live there , but you utterly failed to get the point of this discovery.Life exists in lots of places and ways that we thought were n't possible.Its really silly to much such an absolute statement as yours .
If the oceans 'dried up ' whatever that actually means then life may die out , but its more likely it would continue on in another form .
Just like the life 30k under the surface of the ocean in volcanic vents , 600 feet down in ice , or high altitude lakes that would kill anything you would be able to recognize right off the start as life without a microscope.We know life changes , species come , evolve , and die out , but observation of the past tells us that regardless of what extreme situation happens to the planet , some life form somewhere survives and carries on to repopulate based on the new environment.Really , from a scientific perspective , we have as much evidence that life on earth can cease to exist as we have evidence that gravity can be turned off .
We 've never observed either of those situations directly , but I agree life on Earth ceasing to exist is entirely possible.I also think you have a lack of appreciate for life 's ability to survive thanks to its diversity .
We nor anything else is going to 'destroy life on Earth ' at any point in time that we 're going to find relevant.Human life or life as we know it may end , something will carry on and evolve to survive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doubtful.It might become uninhabitable to the existing life forms that live there, but you utterly failed to get the point of this discovery.Life exists in lots of places and ways that we thought weren't possible.Its really silly to much such an absolute statement as yours.
If the oceans 'dried up' whatever that actually means then life may die out, but its more likely it would continue on in another form.
Just like the life 30k under the surface of the ocean in volcanic vents, 600 feet down in ice, or high altitude lakes that would kill anything you would be able to recognize right off the start as life without a microscope.We know life changes, species come, evolve, and die out, but observation of the past tells us that regardless of what extreme situation happens to the planet, some life form somewhere survives and carries on to repopulate based on the new environment.Really, from a scientific perspective, we have as much evidence that life on earth can cease to exist as we have evidence that gravity can be turned off.
We've never observed either of those situations directly, but I agree life on Earth ceasing to exist is entirely possible.I also think you have a lack of appreciate for life's ability to survive thanks to its diversity.
We nor anything else is going to 'destroy life on Earth' at any point in time that we're going to find relevant.Human life or life as we know it may end, something will carry on and evolve to survive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518276</id>
	<title>Extremophiles</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1268839260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"...And if such life is possible beneath Earth's oceans, why not elsewhere, like Europa?"<br> <br>

Well, because the original prototypes developed in warmer climes and adapted to colder environments later on.<br> <br>

I wouldn't get my hopes up too high about complex life on Europa.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>

Complex life has evolved in the most punishing environments on earth, 4000 Metres below the surface of the ocean, in volcanic vents (water has a PH of 2.8). Not only complex life but complete ecosystems (these are kind of needed to support complex life). Whilst not hoping for life on Europa is a good thing it certainly does prove it is possible for life to develop and flourish under such conditions.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...And if such life is possible beneath Earth 's oceans , why not elsewhere , like Europa ?
" Well , because the original prototypes developed in warmer climes and adapted to colder environments later on .
I would n't get my hopes up too high about complex life on Europa .
Complex life has evolved in the most punishing environments on earth , 4000 Metres below the surface of the ocean , in volcanic vents ( water has a PH of 2.8 ) .
Not only complex life but complete ecosystems ( these are kind of needed to support complex life ) .
Whilst not hoping for life on Europa is a good thing it certainly does prove it is possible for life to develop and flourish under such conditions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...And if such life is possible beneath Earth's oceans, why not elsewhere, like Europa?
" 

Well, because the original prototypes developed in warmer climes and adapted to colder environments later on.
I wouldn't get my hopes up too high about complex life on Europa.
Complex life has evolved in the most punishing environments on earth, 4000 Metres below the surface of the ocean, in volcanic vents (water has a PH of 2.8).
Not only complex life but complete ecosystems (these are kind of needed to support complex life).
Whilst not hoping for life on Europa is a good thing it certainly does prove it is possible for life to develop and flourish under such conditions.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518870</id>
	<title>Re:Europa is not the same</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268844360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shrimp have been found in scalding hot water near vents relying on chemosynthesis, not photosynthesis.  Europa is a tidal planet being pulled to a fro by Jovian gravity thereby creating the heat that keeps the waters under the ice liquid. If there is a core and any kind of volcanic subsurface activity it is not preposterous to theorize that complex life such as the shrimp in the boiling waters could thrive on something other than chlorophyll and photosynthesis.</p><p>We are narrowing the places to look based on what we know life can do at the far extremes on Earth. We would not for example send rovers to Mercury to look for life or water, it is far too hot for either as far as we currently know. Using what we know will help us find what we are looking for by searching favorable habitats instead of wastelands. Sure Europa is harsh by Earth standards but under the ice with tidal forces provided by Jupiter life may be there, or at least its precursors.</p><p>The life clock on Earth (Time since the dawn of life) keeps being pushed farther and farther back(3.8 Billion Years Ago), past where we thought life could have existed and long before the Oxygen Catastrophe (2.4 Billion years Ago). Free oxygen is not needed for simple life ex. Prokaryote.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shrimp have been found in scalding hot water near vents relying on chemosynthesis , not photosynthesis .
Europa is a tidal planet being pulled to a fro by Jovian gravity thereby creating the heat that keeps the waters under the ice liquid .
If there is a core and any kind of volcanic subsurface activity it is not preposterous to theorize that complex life such as the shrimp in the boiling waters could thrive on something other than chlorophyll and photosynthesis.We are narrowing the places to look based on what we know life can do at the far extremes on Earth .
We would not for example send rovers to Mercury to look for life or water , it is far too hot for either as far as we currently know .
Using what we know will help us find what we are looking for by searching favorable habitats instead of wastelands .
Sure Europa is harsh by Earth standards but under the ice with tidal forces provided by Jupiter life may be there , or at least its precursors.The life clock on Earth ( Time since the dawn of life ) keeps being pushed farther and farther back ( 3.8 Billion Years Ago ) , past where we thought life could have existed and long before the Oxygen Catastrophe ( 2.4 Billion years Ago ) .
Free oxygen is not needed for simple life ex .
Prokaryote .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shrimp have been found in scalding hot water near vents relying on chemosynthesis, not photosynthesis.
Europa is a tidal planet being pulled to a fro by Jovian gravity thereby creating the heat that keeps the waters under the ice liquid.
If there is a core and any kind of volcanic subsurface activity it is not preposterous to theorize that complex life such as the shrimp in the boiling waters could thrive on something other than chlorophyll and photosynthesis.We are narrowing the places to look based on what we know life can do at the far extremes on Earth.
We would not for example send rovers to Mercury to look for life or water, it is far too hot for either as far as we currently know.
Using what we know will help us find what we are looking for by searching favorable habitats instead of wastelands.
Sure Europa is harsh by Earth standards but under the ice with tidal forces provided by Jupiter life may be there, or at least its precursors.The life clock on Earth (Time since the dawn of life) keeps being pushed farther and farther back(3.8 Billion Years Ago), past where we thought life could have existed and long before the Oxygen Catastrophe (2.4 Billion years Ago).
Free oxygen is not needed for simple life ex.
Prokaryote.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517638</id>
	<title>Re:only problem</title>
	<author>tixxit</author>
	<datestamp>1268833680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But it gives us hope. Just imagine if the opposite was true; we could never find life in extreme environments. We'd probably be saying looking for life on other planets is most likely a dead end. Instead, life keeps popping up everywhere, even places you could never imagine.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But it gives us hope .
Just imagine if the opposite was true ; we could never find life in extreme environments .
We 'd probably be saying looking for life on other planets is most likely a dead end .
Instead , life keeps popping up everywhere , even places you could never imagine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it gives us hope.
Just imagine if the opposite was true; we could never find life in extreme environments.
We'd probably be saying looking for life on other planets is most likely a dead end.
Instead, life keeps popping up everywhere, even places you could never imagine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516202</id>
	<title>Geography issues?</title>
	<author>freaker\_TuC</author>
	<datestamp>1268824140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>And if such life is possible beneath Earth's oceans, why not elsewhere, <b>like Europa</b>?</p></div></blockquote><p>Yeah, we Europeans are living elsewhere but Earth. We feel more attached to our universe like that...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And if such life is possible beneath Earth 's oceans , why not elsewhere , like Europa ? Yeah , we Europeans are living elsewhere but Earth .
We feel more attached to our universe like that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if such life is possible beneath Earth's oceans, why not elsewhere, like Europa?Yeah, we Europeans are living elsewhere but Earth.
We feel more attached to our universe like that...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517564</id>
	<title>Re:Note to Explorers!</title>
	<author>symbolset</author>
	<datestamp>1268833200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>During the carboniferous era the region around Roosevelt Island was an alluvial plain.  The runoff was nutrient rich, resulting in abundant sea life.  That, and other conditions, means there's probably oil and natural gas there.  So yeah, let's go there <i>also</i>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>During the carboniferous era the region around Roosevelt Island was an alluvial plain .
The runoff was nutrient rich , resulting in abundant sea life .
That , and other conditions , means there 's probably oil and natural gas there .
So yeah , let 's go there also .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>During the carboniferous era the region around Roosevelt Island was an alluvial plain.
The runoff was nutrient rich, resulting in abundant sea life.
That, and other conditions, means there's probably oil and natural gas there.
So yeah, let's go there also.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515976</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517460</id>
	<title>Re:Frolicking?</title>
	<author>ichthyoboy</author>
	<datestamp>1268832360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I went to TFA and found no evidence of "Frolicking" unless a shrimp humping a video cable is now considered sex.</p></div><p>I believe that Rule 34 applies here....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I went to TFA and found no evidence of " Frolicking " unless a shrimp humping a video cable is now considered sex.I believe that Rule 34 applies here... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I went to TFA and found no evidence of "Frolicking" unless a shrimp humping a video cable is now considered sex.I believe that Rule 34 applies here....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515778</id>
	<title>The real question.</title>
	<author>mosb1000</author>
	<datestamp>1268822340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>How does it taste?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How does it taste ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does it taste?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515936</id>
	<title>Frolicking?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268823120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I went to TFA and found no evidence of "Frolicking" unless a shrimp humping a video cable is now considered sex.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I went to TFA and found no evidence of " Frolicking " unless a shrimp humping a video cable is now considered sex .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I went to TFA and found no evidence of "Frolicking" unless a shrimp humping a video cable is now considered sex.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516846</id>
	<title>Re:Why NASA?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268827860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why is the National Aeronautics and Space Administration looking underneath Antartican Ice?</p></div><p>They're looking for the second stargate.  Duh.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is the National Aeronautics and Space Administration looking underneath Antartican Ice ? They 're looking for the second stargate .
Duh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is the National Aeronautics and Space Administration looking underneath Antartican Ice?They're looking for the second stargate.
Duh.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31521024</id>
	<title>Re:I doubt this</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1268917440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If we look in the bible, there is on mention of God being made, therefore the most logical explanation is that it&rsquo;s all made up.</p><p>Sorry to burst your bubble.</p><p>*disappears like a bursting bubble*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If we look in the bible , there is on mention of God being made , therefore the most logical explanation is that it    s all made up.Sorry to burst your bubble .
* disappears like a bursting bubble *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If we look in the bible, there is on mention of God being made, therefore the most logical explanation is that it’s all made up.Sorry to burst your bubble.
*disappears like a bursting bubble*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516308</id>
	<title>Re:Why NASA?</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1268824740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why is the National Aeronautics and Space Administration looking underneath Antartican Ice?</p></div><p>Are you seriously asking why NASA would be studying life in extreme hostile environments?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is the National Aeronautics and Space Administration looking underneath Antartican Ice ? Are you seriously asking why NASA would be studying life in extreme hostile environments ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is the National Aeronautics and Space Administration looking underneath Antartican Ice?Are you seriously asking why NASA would be studying life in extreme hostile environments?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515876</id>
	<title>Europa is not the same</title>
	<author>Capt.Albatross</author>
	<datestamp>1268822760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>These creatures probably depend on free oxygen to live, which comes from plant life on the unglaciated parts of the Earth's surface.

This is not an argument against the possibility of life on Europa, it is an argument against assuming that the environment under Europa's ice is as life-friendly that under Antarctica's.</htmltext>
<tokenext>These creatures probably depend on free oxygen to live , which comes from plant life on the unglaciated parts of the Earth 's surface .
This is not an argument against the possibility of life on Europa , it is an argument against assuming that the environment under Europa 's ice is as life-friendly that under Antarctica 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These creatures probably depend on free oxygen to live, which comes from plant life on the unglaciated parts of the Earth's surface.
This is not an argument against the possibility of life on Europa, it is an argument against assuming that the environment under Europa's ice is as life-friendly that under Antarctica's.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517236</id>
	<title>Vokken Prawn!</title>
	<author>Kryptonut</author>
	<datestamp>1268830500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I knew it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I knew it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I knew it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31521000</id>
	<title>Re:Oceans too</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1268917260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imagine all the 3D space we could live in if all the land would become flooded!</p><p>MUHAHAHAHAHAA</p><p>Your sleeping winged and tentacled overlords of the future</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine all the 3D space we could live in if all the land would become flooded ! MUHAHAHAHAHAAYour sleeping winged and tentacled overlords of the future</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine all the 3D space we could live in if all the land would become flooded!MUHAHAHAHAHAAYour sleeping winged and tentacled overlords of the future</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515702</id>
	<title>Because Earth already has a proven Ecosystem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268822100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and Europa doesn't.</p><p>Duh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and Europa does n't.Duh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and Europa doesn't.Duh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31519778</id>
	<title>Re:Did you mean...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268943420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>People don't like pedantics, especially when they're wrong.</p></div></blockquote><p>While you're here, "pedantic" is an adjective.  The word you're looking for is "pedants".</p><blockquote><div><p>The correct word is Lysianassidae.</p></div> </blockquote><p>That's just the Latin version of Lysianassids.  Just because Google says "did you mean..." doesn't mean the word entered is wrong.</p><p>0/2.  Fail.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>People do n't like pedantics , especially when they 're wrong.While you 're here , " pedantic " is an adjective .
The word you 're looking for is " pedants " .The correct word is Lysianassidae .
That 's just the Latin version of Lysianassids .
Just because Google says " did you mean... " does n't mean the word entered is wrong.0/2 .
Fail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People don't like pedantics, especially when they're wrong.While you're here, "pedantic" is an adjective.
The word you're looking for is "pedants".The correct word is Lysianassidae.
That's just the Latin version of Lysianassids.
Just because Google says "did you mean..." doesn't mean the word entered is wrong.0/2.
Fail.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516336</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518540</id>
	<title>Re:I'm just sayin...</title>
	<author>WillDraven</author>
	<datestamp>1268841600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe if we don't find any we could put some there. Turn it into the solar systems largest shrimp farm.</p><p>No matter how you look at it Europa is of interest to humans if we plan on expanding into the solar system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe if we do n't find any we could put some there .
Turn it into the solar systems largest shrimp farm.No matter how you look at it Europa is of interest to humans if we plan on expanding into the solar system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe if we don't find any we could put some there.
Turn it into the solar systems largest shrimp farm.No matter how you look at it Europa is of interest to humans if we plan on expanding into the solar system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31520428</id>
	<title>Re:Oceans too</title>
	<author>mcvos</author>
	<datestamp>1268910420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Imagine the impossibility of the oceans drying up.</p><p>For the ocean to "dry up" the water would have to be removed from the planet. That requires two energy inputs: first, enough energy to boil all the water in all the oceans. Second, enough energy to raise the velocity of each molecule of water vapor to the escape velocity.</p></div><p>Why escape velocity? Just boil them up, and you've got your dry ocean beds. And the extra water in the atmosphere amplifies the greenhouse effect in order to keep them dry. Think Venus.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine the impossibility of the oceans drying up.For the ocean to " dry up " the water would have to be removed from the planet .
That requires two energy inputs : first , enough energy to boil all the water in all the oceans .
Second , enough energy to raise the velocity of each molecule of water vapor to the escape velocity.Why escape velocity ?
Just boil them up , and you 've got your dry ocean beds .
And the extra water in the atmosphere amplifies the greenhouse effect in order to keep them dry .
Think Venus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine the impossibility of the oceans drying up.For the ocean to "dry up" the water would have to be removed from the planet.
That requires two energy inputs: first, enough energy to boil all the water in all the oceans.
Second, enough energy to raise the velocity of each molecule of water vapor to the escape velocity.Why escape velocity?
Just boil them up, and you've got your dry ocean beds.
And the extra water in the atmosphere amplifies the greenhouse effect in order to keep them dry.
Think Venus.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516322</id>
	<title>it's much simpler than that</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268824800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And if such life is possible beneath Earth's oceans, why not elsewhere, like Europa?</p></div><p>There's just too many Europeans there for it to possibly sustain life.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And if such life is possible beneath Earth 's oceans , why not elsewhere , like Europa ? There 's just too many Europeans there for it to possibly sustain life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if such life is possible beneath Earth's oceans, why not elsewhere, like Europa?There's just too many Europeans there for it to possibly sustain life.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516952</id>
	<title>Lots of life in the Antarctic - if you look for it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268828700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This doesn't surprise me too much.  The <a href="http://scini1.mlml.calstate.edu/" title="calstate.edu" rel="nofollow">SCINI Project</a> [calstate.edu] has been finding neat stuff for some time now, even while they were just testing their equipment.

</p><p>Microbes have even been found living <i>in</i> the ice of the polar plateau (at constant temperatures around -50C).

</p><p>And check out <a href="http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8264d2wz.pdf\%3Faction=transientDownload;expire=72h;from=2009-11-17:17:55;key=8991d5442ddf57caefb99abd4318d0fb" title="escholarship.org" rel="nofollow">Anoxycalyx Joubini</a> [escholarship.org] (Volcano Sponge), some specimens of which are thought to be 15,000 years old and still living.  These are <i>animals</i> that make those Sequoia look like juveniles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This does n't surprise me too much .
The SCINI Project [ calstate.edu ] has been finding neat stuff for some time now , even while they were just testing their equipment .
Microbes have even been found living in the ice of the polar plateau ( at constant temperatures around -50C ) .
And check out Anoxycalyx Joubini [ escholarship.org ] ( Volcano Sponge ) , some specimens of which are thought to be 15,000 years old and still living .
These are animals that make those Sequoia look like juveniles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This doesn't surprise me too much.
The SCINI Project [calstate.edu] has been finding neat stuff for some time now, even while they were just testing their equipment.
Microbes have even been found living in the ice of the polar plateau (at constant temperatures around -50C).
And check out Anoxycalyx Joubini [escholarship.org] (Volcano Sponge), some specimens of which are thought to be 15,000 years old and still living.
These are animals that make those Sequoia look like juveniles.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517342</id>
	<title>Re:Oceans too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268831280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Zoidberg!!!!</p><p><a href="http://mirror.servut.us/kuvat/meinung/zoidberg\_real.jpg" title="servut.us">http://mirror.servut.us/kuvat/meinung/zoidberg\_real.jpg</a> [servut.us]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Zoidberg ! ! !
! http : //mirror.servut.us/kuvat/meinung/zoidberg \ _real.jpg [ servut.us ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Zoidberg!!!
!http://mirror.servut.us/kuvat/meinung/zoidberg\_real.jpg [servut.us]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31520286</id>
	<title>Re:Europa?</title>
	<author>dadelbunts</author>
	<datestamp>1268908200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do you think when Lucifer appears we can get rid of daylight savings?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you think when Lucifer appears we can get rid of daylight savings ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you think when Lucifer appears we can get rid of daylight savings?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515840</id>
	<title>Re:Oceans too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268822700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you feeling OK?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you feeling OK ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you feeling OK?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516302</id>
	<title>Mmmmmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268824740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How does it taste?</p></div><p>Jellyfish and shrimp sandwich!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How does it taste ? Jellyfish and shrimp sandwich !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does it taste?Jellyfish and shrimp sandwich!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518250</id>
	<title>Re:Surely nuclear subs have been there?</title>
	<author>GumphMaster</author>
	<datestamp>1268838900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sending your nuclear armed and powered submarine under the northern ice sheet is the only way to place these weapons along the north coast of the USSR (conversely North America) during the northern winter when the entire region is icebound.   A lot of data was gathered so that the parties knew where the ice was passable and thin enough to surface without fatally damaging the submarine.  The proximity to a perceived foe and suicidal political imperative to do this does not exist in the south.</p><p>Quite a few unmanned, research vehicles have explored under the edges of the Antarctic sea ice.  The ice sheet over the continent is also being explored under, although not with submarines (Lake Vostok).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sending your nuclear armed and powered submarine under the northern ice sheet is the only way to place these weapons along the north coast of the USSR ( conversely North America ) during the northern winter when the entire region is icebound .
A lot of data was gathered so that the parties knew where the ice was passable and thin enough to surface without fatally damaging the submarine .
The proximity to a perceived foe and suicidal political imperative to do this does not exist in the south.Quite a few unmanned , research vehicles have explored under the edges of the Antarctic sea ice .
The ice sheet over the continent is also being explored under , although not with submarines ( Lake Vostok ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sending your nuclear armed and powered submarine under the northern ice sheet is the only way to place these weapons along the north coast of the USSR (conversely North America) during the northern winter when the entire region is icebound.
A lot of data was gathered so that the parties knew where the ice was passable and thin enough to surface without fatally damaging the submarine.
The proximity to a perceived foe and suicidal political imperative to do this does not exist in the south.Quite a few unmanned, research vehicles have explored under the edges of the Antarctic sea ice.
The ice sheet over the continent is also being explored under, although not with submarines (Lake Vostok).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516086</id>
	<title>Plato on the moon?</title>
	<author>Bill, Shooter of Bul</author>
	<datestamp>1268823720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We know that humans have traveled to the moon. Humans similar in biological content to the famous greek philosopher Plato. So, is it possible that Plato traveled to the Moon?</p><p>Plato was a smart guy, but he couldn't have landed on the moon. Landing on the moon required us to adapt well enough to a very hospitable environment before we could even reach the moon's harsh landscape. I think We might discover the same is true of life. Its more likely to develop in a very hospitable environment and then over time develop the skills necissiary to thrive in harsher climates. I do think we might be able to transplant our extreme lifeforms to other planets. In the same way a lunar rover would probably do okay on the surface of  mars as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We know that humans have traveled to the moon .
Humans similar in biological content to the famous greek philosopher Plato .
So , is it possible that Plato traveled to the Moon ? Plato was a smart guy , but he could n't have landed on the moon .
Landing on the moon required us to adapt well enough to a very hospitable environment before we could even reach the moon 's harsh landscape .
I think We might discover the same is true of life .
Its more likely to develop in a very hospitable environment and then over time develop the skills necissiary to thrive in harsher climates .
I do think we might be able to transplant our extreme lifeforms to other planets .
In the same way a lunar rover would probably do okay on the surface of mars as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We know that humans have traveled to the moon.
Humans similar in biological content to the famous greek philosopher Plato.
So, is it possible that Plato traveled to the Moon?Plato was a smart guy, but he couldn't have landed on the moon.
Landing on the moon required us to adapt well enough to a very hospitable environment before we could even reach the moon's harsh landscape.
I think We might discover the same is true of life.
Its more likely to develop in a very hospitable environment and then over time develop the skills necissiary to thrive in harsher climates.
I do think we might be able to transplant our extreme lifeforms to other planets.
In the same way a lunar rover would probably do okay on the surface of  mars as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31521046</id>
	<title>Re:only problem</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1268917620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I&rsquo;m in Germany right now, and from what I can see, there&rsquo;s no complex life here.</p><p>The most complex thing I found is a common Potatous Couchus Televisiones mold.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I    m in Germany right now , and from what I can see , there    s no complex life here.The most complex thing I found is a common Potatous Couchus Televisiones mold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I’m in Germany right now, and from what I can see, there’s no complex life here.The most complex thing I found is a common Potatous Couchus Televisiones mold.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31522254</id>
	<title>Re:Not likely</title>
	<author>Toze</author>
	<datestamp>1268924400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps Canada could send a colonization effort?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps Canada could send a colonization effort ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps Canada could send a colonization effort?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516844</id>
	<title>Re:only problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268827860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's speculation because the complex life forms survived there and adapted, TFA doesn't say that they evolved there into jelly and fish, so even if we find life on Europa or any other candidates this doesn't mean it will be a life form more complex than a microbe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's speculation because the complex life forms survived there and adapted , TFA does n't say that they evolved there into jelly and fish , so even if we find life on Europa or any other candidates this does n't mean it will be a life form more complex than a microbe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's speculation because the complex life forms survived there and adapted, TFA doesn't say that they evolved there into jelly and fish, so even if we find life on Europa or any other candidates this doesn't mean it will be a life form more complex than a microbe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517986</id>
	<title>Re:only problem</title>
	<author>infinite.intimation</author>
	<datestamp>1268836740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You seem to not mention that the Cambrian EXPLOSION ( like explosion of life..) on Earth... was during a period when the Earth was CERTAINLY at least a Slush-ball... and POSSIBLY an ICEball. [science])
Not jumping to attack your position; just thought it was worth pointing out that the "environment 'needed' for evolving to create complex life... is not necessarily a fixed variable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You seem to not mention that the Cambrian EXPLOSION ( like explosion of life.. ) on Earth... was during a period when the Earth was CERTAINLY at least a Slush-ball... and POSSIBLY an ICEball .
[ science ] ) Not jumping to attack your position ; just thought it was worth pointing out that the " environment 'needed ' for evolving to create complex life... is not necessarily a fixed variable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You seem to not mention that the Cambrian EXPLOSION ( like explosion of life..) on Earth... was during a period when the Earth was CERTAINLY at least a Slush-ball... and POSSIBLY an ICEball.
[science])
Not jumping to attack your position; just thought it was worth pointing out that the "environment 'needed' for evolving to create complex life... is not necessarily a fixed variable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515978</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31528670</id>
	<title>Re:only problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268906040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In this context, "comfortable" by very definition means a set of conditions to which an organism has thoroughly adapted.  So, any beginning of life is by definition in "uncomfortable" conditions.</p><p>Well, unless the life begins via intelligent design<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In this context , " comfortable " by very definition means a set of conditions to which an organism has thoroughly adapted .
So , any beginning of life is by definition in " uncomfortable " conditions.Well , unless the life begins via intelligent design : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In this context, "comfortable" by very definition means a set of conditions to which an organism has thoroughly adapted.
So, any beginning of life is by definition in "uncomfortable" conditions.Well, unless the life begins via intelligent design :P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515978</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31519730</id>
	<title>Re:Oceans too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268942880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's beginning to look a lot like.... <a href="http://www.cthulhulives.org/Solstice/fish-menplayer.html" title="cthulhulives.org" rel="nofollow">fish men!</a> [cthulhulives.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's beginning to look a lot like.... fish men !
[ cthulhulives.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's beginning to look a lot like.... fish men!
[cthulhulives.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516218</id>
	<title>Re:Oceans too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268824260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In some parts they go down as much as Mount Everest goes up.</p></div><p>yeah, like your girlfriend!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In some parts they go down as much as Mount Everest goes up.yeah , like your girlfriend !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In some parts they go down as much as Mount Everest goes up.yeah, like your girlfriend!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31522444</id>
	<title>Public service: Translation to standard units</title>
	<author>daem0n1x</author>
	<datestamp>1268925480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"NASA ice scientists have found a shrimp-like creature and a possible jellyfish 'frolicking' beneath 180 metres of solid Antarctic ice, where only microbes were expected to live. The odds of finding two complex lifeforms after drilling only a 20 cm-wide hole suggests there may be much more. And if such life is possible beneath Earth's oceans, why not elsewhere, like Europa?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" NASA ice scientists have found a shrimp-like creature and a possible jellyfish 'frolicking ' beneath 180 metres of solid Antarctic ice , where only microbes were expected to live .
The odds of finding two complex lifeforms after drilling only a 20 cm-wide hole suggests there may be much more .
And if such life is possible beneath Earth 's oceans , why not elsewhere , like Europa ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"NASA ice scientists have found a shrimp-like creature and a possible jellyfish 'frolicking' beneath 180 metres of solid Antarctic ice, where only microbes were expected to live.
The odds of finding two complex lifeforms after drilling only a 20 cm-wide hole suggests there may be much more.
And if such life is possible beneath Earth's oceans, why not elsewhere, like Europa?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668</id>
	<title>Oceans too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268821980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>60\% of the Earth is filled with oceans. In some parts they go down as much as Mount Everest goes up. That means over half of our planet is still not searched. Some of the found fishes in there are really weird as well and look like aliens.</p><p>Imagine the land amount all those oceans would free if tried up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>60 \ % of the Earth is filled with oceans .
In some parts they go down as much as Mount Everest goes up .
That means over half of our planet is still not searched .
Some of the found fishes in there are really weird as well and look like aliens.Imagine the land amount all those oceans would free if tried up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>60\% of the Earth is filled with oceans.
In some parts they go down as much as Mount Everest goes up.
That means over half of our planet is still not searched.
Some of the found fishes in there are really weird as well and look like aliens.Imagine the land amount all those oceans would free if tried up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515864</id>
	<title>More scientific arrogance...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268822760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FTA:</p><p>"It's pretty amazing when you find a huge puzzle like that on a planet where we thought we know everything," Kim said.</p><p>Sheesh!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FTA : " It 's pretty amazing when you find a huge puzzle like that on a planet where we thought we know everything , " Kim said.Sheesh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTA:"It's pretty amazing when you find a huge puzzle like that on a planet where we thought we know everything," Kim said.Sheesh!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516344</id>
	<title>Re:only problem</title>
	<author>isama</author>
	<datestamp>1268824920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So maybe a tiny rock flew past the earth and picked up a couple of bacteria and crashed into europa. (i'm not sure that's possible, but it could be..)</htmltext>
<tokenext>So maybe a tiny rock flew past the earth and picked up a couple of bacteria and crashed into europa .
( i 'm not sure that 's possible , but it could be.. )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So maybe a tiny rock flew past the earth and picked up a couple of bacteria and crashed into europa.
(i'm not sure that's possible, but it could be..)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515978</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515994</id>
	<title>I'm just sayin...</title>
	<author>wcrowe</author>
	<datestamp>1268823300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"...And if such life is possible beneath Earth's oceans, why not elsewhere, like Europa?"</i></p><p>Well, because the original prototypes developed in warmer climes and adapted to colder environments later on.</p><p>I wouldn't get my hopes up <i>too</i> high about complex life on Europa.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...And if such life is possible beneath Earth 's oceans , why not elsewhere , like Europa ?
" Well , because the original prototypes developed in warmer climes and adapted to colder environments later on.I would n't get my hopes up too high about complex life on Europa .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...And if such life is possible beneath Earth's oceans, why not elsewhere, like Europa?
"Well, because the original prototypes developed in warmer climes and adapted to colder environments later on.I wouldn't get my hopes up too high about complex life on Europa.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516646</id>
	<title>Re:only problem</title>
	<author>DigiShaman</author>
	<datestamp>1268826660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some say that life on Earth started (and evolved) around hydrothermal vents where there is no sunlight. The get their energy through a process known as chemosynthesis. If true, life on any ocean bearing planet could become common if not expected. Going to Europa will change those odds one way or another.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some say that life on Earth started ( and evolved ) around hydrothermal vents where there is no sunlight .
The get their energy through a process known as chemosynthesis .
If true , life on any ocean bearing planet could become common if not expected .
Going to Europa will change those odds one way or another .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some say that life on Earth started (and evolved) around hydrothermal vents where there is no sunlight.
The get their energy through a process known as chemosynthesis.
If true, life on any ocean bearing planet could become common if not expected.
Going to Europa will change those odds one way or another.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515978</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31529540</id>
	<title>Re:Europa?</title>
	<author>dotancohen</author>
	<datestamp>1268909340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's funny when Eurotrash tries to make an American look uneducated and only succeeds in revealing their own lack of culture.</p><p>Here's a hint: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010:\_Odyssey\_Two" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010:\_Odyssey\_Two</a> [wikipedia.org] </p></div><p>1) I'm neither European nor American.<br>2) The 2010 quote is not to land on Europa.<br>3) I got the 2001 quote. I noticed the 2001 album in A Clockwork Orange. I still think that Saturn was the "right" planet. I've got a monolith on my doorpost.<br>4) You confuse my lack of culture for your lack of integrity in your own.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's funny when Eurotrash tries to make an American look uneducated and only succeeds in revealing their own lack of culture.Here 's a hint : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010 : \ _Odyssey \ _Two [ wikipedia.org ] 1 ) I 'm neither European nor American.2 ) The 2010 quote is not to land on Europa.3 ) I got the 2001 quote .
I noticed the 2001 album in A Clockwork Orange .
I still think that Saturn was the " right " planet .
I 've got a monolith on my doorpost.4 ) You confuse my lack of culture for your lack of integrity in your own .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's funny when Eurotrash tries to make an American look uneducated and only succeeds in revealing their own lack of culture.Here's a hint: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010:\_Odyssey\_Two [wikipedia.org] 1) I'm neither European nor American.2) The 2010 quote is not to land on Europa.3) I got the 2001 quote.
I noticed the 2001 album in A Clockwork Orange.
I still think that Saturn was the "right" planet.
I've got a monolith on my doorpost.4) You confuse my lack of culture for your lack of integrity in your own.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515942</id>
	<title>Why NASA?</title>
	<author>BobMcD</author>
	<datestamp>1268823120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is the National Aeronautics and Space Administration looking underneath Antartican Ice?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is the National Aeronautics and Space Administration looking underneath Antartican Ice ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is the National Aeronautics and Space Administration looking underneath Antartican Ice?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31520350</id>
	<title>Re:I doubt this</title>
	<author>gsslay</author>
	<datestamp>1268909160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry, "contamination" is a scientific explanation, and we all know they are just a theories.</p><p>The plain truth about this is that the devil put them there to mislead us.  We must ignore them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , " contamination " is a scientific explanation , and we all know they are just a theories.The plain truth about this is that the devil put them there to mislead us .
We must ignore them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, "contamination" is a scientific explanation, and we all know they are just a theories.The plain truth about this is that the devil put them there to mislead us.
We must ignore them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515760</id>
	<title>Ice scientists?!?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268822340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ice scientists?  Wow!  I thought the only one was Jan of the Wonder Twins.  ("Form of, an Ice Scientist!")</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ice scientists ?
Wow ! I thought the only one was Jan of the Wonder Twins .
( " Form of , an Ice Scientist !
" )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ice scientists?
Wow!  I thought the only one was Jan of the Wonder Twins.
("Form of, an Ice Scientist!
")</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31523942</id>
	<title>Re:only problem</title>
	<author>ResidentSourcerer</author>
	<datestamp>1268932560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Life under the Antarctic shelf has external inputs:  Water circulates there from the open ocean, bringing with it all sorts of gourmet delicacies.</p><p>Life on Europa doesn't have an adjacent sunlit ocean providing energy inputs.</p><p>The colonies of critters living around hydrothermal vents is a better model of potential Europa life than life under the edge of the shelf.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Life under the Antarctic shelf has external inputs : Water circulates there from the open ocean , bringing with it all sorts of gourmet delicacies.Life on Europa does n't have an adjacent sunlit ocean providing energy inputs.The colonies of critters living around hydrothermal vents is a better model of potential Europa life than life under the edge of the shelf .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Life under the Antarctic shelf has external inputs:  Water circulates there from the open ocean, bringing with it all sorts of gourmet delicacies.Life on Europa doesn't have an adjacent sunlit ocean providing energy inputs.The colonies of critters living around hydrothermal vents is a better model of potential Europa life than life under the edge of the shelf.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515978</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31522216</id>
	<title>Re:Oceans too</title>
	<author>Toze</author>
	<datestamp>1268924280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, what you're saying is, we'd come out even?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , what you 're saying is , we 'd come out even ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, what you're saying is, we'd come out even?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31519206</id>
	<title>Re:There is a misspelling...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268848020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sad, but it took me three tries to catch the differences in your words.</p><p>I was wondering how you got a +5 Informative for being anal about putting the classification in italics =)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sad , but it took me three tries to catch the differences in your words.I was wondering how you got a + 5 Informative for being anal about putting the classification in italics = )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sad, but it took me three tries to catch the differences in your words.I was wondering how you got a +5 Informative for being anal about putting the classification in italics =)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31520916</id>
	<title>Could not agree more</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268916600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a tired old canard that seems to be repeated endlessly.</p><p>Look, life has been found "here" (some hostile environment on Earth) therefore it could have evolved "there" (somewhere in the solar system).</p><p>There is a conceptual gap between the two. Yes, once life has started (probably in a narrow range of highly favourable conditions) it can adapt to fill all possible niches in an eco-system. Leaping from this to saying that life could start in one of these extremes of the environment is unwarranted and unhelpful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a tired old canard that seems to be repeated endlessly.Look , life has been found " here " ( some hostile environment on Earth ) therefore it could have evolved " there " ( somewhere in the solar system ) .There is a conceptual gap between the two .
Yes , once life has started ( probably in a narrow range of highly favourable conditions ) it can adapt to fill all possible niches in an eco-system .
Leaping from this to saying that life could start in one of these extremes of the environment is unwarranted and unhelpful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a tired old canard that seems to be repeated endlessly.Look, life has been found "here" (some hostile environment on Earth) therefore it could have evolved "there" (somewhere in the solar system).There is a conceptual gap between the two.
Yes, once life has started (probably in a narrow range of highly favourable conditions) it can adapt to fill all possible niches in an eco-system.
Leaping from this to saying that life could start in one of these extremes of the environment is unwarranted and unhelpful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516304</id>
	<title>Re:Europa?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268824740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I see what you did there.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I see what you did there .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see what you did there.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518338</id>
	<title>Re:Plato on the moon?</title>
	<author>Skreems</author>
	<datestamp>1268839800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your implied concept of what is "comfortable" for life involves the mother of all selection biases. We don't know everything about the state of the earth when life originated, but we know for sure it was not what we'd consider "hospitable" based on the majority of life on this planet today. If anything, our current environment is the "extreme" one that life was gradually forced to adapt to... all sorts of unstable, corrosive gasses and exotic chemicals all over the place.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your implied concept of what is " comfortable " for life involves the mother of all selection biases .
We do n't know everything about the state of the earth when life originated , but we know for sure it was not what we 'd consider " hospitable " based on the majority of life on this planet today .
If anything , our current environment is the " extreme " one that life was gradually forced to adapt to... all sorts of unstable , corrosive gasses and exotic chemicals all over the place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your implied concept of what is "comfortable" for life involves the mother of all selection biases.
We don't know everything about the state of the earth when life originated, but we know for sure it was not what we'd consider "hospitable" based on the majority of life on this planet today.
If anything, our current environment is the "extreme" one that life was gradually forced to adapt to... all sorts of unstable, corrosive gasses and exotic chemicals all over the place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517970</id>
	<title>Re:Europa?</title>
	<author>aBaldrich</author>
	<datestamp>1268836560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And I thought Slashdot would inform me on these topics before my country's <a href="http://www.lanacion.com.ar/nota.asp?nota\_id=1244252" title="lanacion.com.ar" rel="nofollow">printed</a> [lanacion.com.ar] media.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And I thought Slashdot would inform me on these topics before my country 's printed [ lanacion.com.ar ] media .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I thought Slashdot would inform me on these topics before my country's printed [lanacion.com.ar] media.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515886</id>
	<title>Life under Antarctic ice? This sounds familiar...</title>
	<author>Tumbleweed</author>
	<datestamp>1268822820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Get out your torches, and somebody call Kurt Russell, quick!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Get out your torches , and somebody call Kurt Russell , quick !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get out your torches, and somebody call Kurt Russell, quick!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518314</id>
	<title>Mmmm. Just imagine the tastey fish of Europa...</title>
	<author>Jackie\_Chan\_Fan</author>
	<datestamp>1268839560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe they'll have 3 eyes without all of the yucky radiation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they 'll have 3 eyes without all of the yucky radiation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they'll have 3 eyes without all of the yucky radiation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516132</id>
	<title>Re:Oceans too</title>
	<author>Arimus</author>
	<datestamp>1268823840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"Some of the found fishes in there are really weird as well and look like aliens."</p></div></blockquote><p>How many aliens have you seen to confirm that the fish look like them?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Some of the found fishes in there are really weird as well and look like aliens .
" How many aliens have you seen to confirm that the fish look like them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Some of the found fishes in there are really weird as well and look like aliens.
"How many aliens have you seen to confirm that the fish look like them?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31525800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31521208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31521046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31520916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31519206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31521024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31554370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516304
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31521100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31519194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31522216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31526098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31523942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31529540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31562550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31519992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31522254
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518340
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31520350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31519778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517564
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31521272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31519730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31521000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518276
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31520428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516936
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31528670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31530162
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31520286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_17_210251_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31529580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516114
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31520916
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516308
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516258
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516322
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517638
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515978
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517986
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31528670
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516646
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31523942
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516344
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516844
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31521046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516094
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518340
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516952
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517516
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517460
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515952
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516266
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31522254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31521272
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515926
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31522216
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31519194
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518420
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517192
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517792
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31530162
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31525800
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31520428
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31521000
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516132
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31521100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515930
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31519730
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516316
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518450
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518250
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31521208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516630
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515864
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515778
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516034
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517622
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516336
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31519778
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31519992
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31519206
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515876
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518870
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31519158
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518540
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517564
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516098
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515906
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31520350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31521024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31562550
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31554370
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31518314
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_17_210251.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516304
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31517970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31515790
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31526098
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516936
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516364
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31529580
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516432
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31529540
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31520286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_17_210251.31516478
</commentlist>
</conversation>
