<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_16_1613219</id>
	<title>Jobcentre Apologizes For Anti-Jedi Discrimination</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1268758860000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Chris Jarvis, 31, is described as a Star Wars fan and member of the International Church of Jediism. Said church's intergalactic hoodie uniform is <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/16/jobcentre\_jedi/">at odds with the strict doctrine of the Department for Work and Pensions</a>, which may require Jobcentre 'customers' to remove crash helmets or hoods for 'security reasons.' Following his ejection, Jarvis filled out a complaint form and within three days got a written apology from branch boss Wendy Flewers. She said: 'We are committed to provide a customer service which embraces diversity and respects customers' religion.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Chris Jarvis , 31 , is described as a Star Wars fan and member of the International Church of Jediism .
Said church 's intergalactic hoodie uniform is at odds with the strict doctrine of the Department for Work and Pensions , which may require Jobcentre 'customers ' to remove crash helmets or hoods for 'security reasons .
' Following his ejection , Jarvis filled out a complaint form and within three days got a written apology from branch boss Wendy Flewers .
She said : 'We are committed to provide a customer service which embraces diversity and respects customers ' religion .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Chris Jarvis, 31, is described as a Star Wars fan and member of the International Church of Jediism.
Said church's intergalactic hoodie uniform is at odds with the strict doctrine of the Department for Work and Pensions, which may require Jobcentre 'customers' to remove crash helmets or hoods for 'security reasons.
' Following his ejection, Jarvis filled out a complaint form and within three days got a written apology from branch boss Wendy Flewers.
She said: 'We are committed to provide a customer service which embraces diversity and respects customers' religion.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499078</id>
	<title>Janism</title>
	<author>Derling Whirvish</author>
	<datestamp>1268767020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'mm starting a nudist religion.</p></div><p>No need to start one -- it already exists. Look up "Janism" and their Digambara monks. Senior monks wear no clothes and go around nude. "Digambara" means "clad in the sky" where the sky is your clothing. It's an old religion and is recognized as such by practically every official entity.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I'mm starting a nudist religion.No need to start one -- it already exists .
Look up " Janism " and their Digambara monks .
Senior monks wear no clothes and go around nude .
" Digambara " means " clad in the sky " where the sky is your clothing .
It 's an old religion and is recognized as such by practically every official entity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'mm starting a nudist religion.No need to start one -- it already exists.
Look up "Janism" and their Digambara monks.
Senior monks wear no clothes and go around nude.
"Digambara" means "clad in the sky" where the sky is your clothing.
It's an old religion and is recognized as such by practically every official entity.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499666</id>
	<title>You know you work at a crappy jobcenter when...</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1268769360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>people are constantly robbing you...</p><p>Robber: "Well I originally was coming here looking for a job, and then thought to myself 'Wait a tick! Why don't I just take their money, that's way easier!'"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>people are constantly robbing you...Robber : " Well I originally was coming here looking for a job , and then thought to myself 'Wait a tick !
Why do n't I just take their money , that 's way easier !
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>people are constantly robbing you...Robber: "Well I originally was coming here looking for a job, and then thought to myself 'Wait a tick!
Why don't I just take their money, that's way easier!
'"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500618</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>BForrester</author>
	<datestamp>1268730180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The catch being that in rich areas with no unemployment and where people are insured or can afford their own medical bills, you have church leaders with outrageous salaries and benefits and NPOs with extravagant facilities.  In areas with lots of unemployed, homeless and sick people, NPOs that require local funding are horribly underequipped to serve the basic needs of people on the bottom of the social scale.</p><p>The ideal version of socialized healthcare is that it is universal; anyone can receive basic, needed services regardless of income or geography.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The catch being that in rich areas with no unemployment and where people are insured or can afford their own medical bills , you have church leaders with outrageous salaries and benefits and NPOs with extravagant facilities .
In areas with lots of unemployed , homeless and sick people , NPOs that require local funding are horribly underequipped to serve the basic needs of people on the bottom of the social scale.The ideal version of socialized healthcare is that it is universal ; anyone can receive basic , needed services regardless of income or geography .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The catch being that in rich areas with no unemployment and where people are insured or can afford their own medical bills, you have church leaders with outrageous salaries and benefits and NPOs with extravagant facilities.
In areas with lots of unemployed, homeless and sick people, NPOs that require local funding are horribly underequipped to serve the basic needs of people on the bottom of the social scale.The ideal version of socialized healthcare is that it is universal; anyone can receive basic, needed services regardless of income or geography.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499264</id>
	<title>Re:We Todd Dead</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1268767740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, I bet he really embarrasses his girlfriend at the theater.</p><p>Oh, wait.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , I bet he really embarrasses his girlfriend at the theater.Oh , wait .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, I bet he really embarrasses his girlfriend at the theater.Oh, wait.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31501232</id>
	<title>Re:***NEWSFLASH***</title>
	<author>psithurism</author>
	<datestamp>1268733120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Chris Jarvis, 31 year old Star Wars fan, finally gets laid and gets a life.</p></div><p>Also, loses geek card and ejected from the church of Jedi.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Chris Jarvis , 31 year old Star Wars fan , finally gets laid and gets a life.Also , loses geek card and ejected from the church of Jedi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chris Jarvis, 31 year old Star Wars fan, finally gets laid and gets a life.Also, loses geek card and ejected from the church of Jedi.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31505202</id>
	<title>Re:A little extreme?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268765220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Replicas be damned. If it isn't a real, fully functional version I'm not interested thanks.</p><p>~ A Star Wars geek</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Replicas be damned .
If it is n't a real , fully functional version I 'm not interested thanks. ~ A Star Wars geek</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Replicas be damned.
If it isn't a real, fully functional version I'm not interested thanks.~ A Star Wars geek</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497992</id>
	<title>Re:He could have fixed it with a wave of the hand</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268762880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... he sounds like a pretty weak ass jedi!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed ... he sounds like a pretty weak ass jedi !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed ... he sounds like a pretty weak ass jedi!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31511414</id>
	<title>Re:He could have fixed it with a wave of the hand</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1268850600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><strong>Well until the next idiot and the next idiot and so on come along and try to pull the same stunt.  Sometimes it's best to just nip it in the bud before it blows up and you have tons of *******s trying to make up excuses for why they should be above a rule that everyone else but them has to follow.</strong></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well until the next idiot and the next idiot and so on come along and try to pull the same stunt .
Sometimes it 's best to just nip it in the bud before it blows up and you have tons of * * * * * * * s trying to make up excuses for why they should be above a rule that everyone else but them has to follow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well until the next idiot and the next idiot and so on come along and try to pull the same stunt.
Sometimes it's best to just nip it in the bud before it blows up and you have tons of *******s trying to make up excuses for why they should be above a rule that everyone else but them has to follow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499378</id>
	<title>Religion is dangerous, not a plaything.</title>
	<author>Delusion\_</author>
	<datestamp>1268768220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe joining one of these new pseudo-religious religions (wicca, jedi, LaVey-style Satanism, whatever) isn't such a great idea.</p><p>These sorts of religions aren't faiths.  They're social playgrounds for bored agnostics and atheists who don't really believe in religion per se, but they miss the silly ritualism, dress codes, and liturgy.  It furthers the notion that adhering to some form of religion is better than agnosticism, atheism, or just plain being honest about what you do or do not believe.</p><p>Freedom of religion is a great thing.  So rather than fight for fake faith rights, maybe we should fight for the right for an atheist or strongly agnostic politician to not have to lie about being a Christian just to be electable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe joining one of these new pseudo-religious religions ( wicca , jedi , LaVey-style Satanism , whatever ) is n't such a great idea.These sorts of religions are n't faiths .
They 're social playgrounds for bored agnostics and atheists who do n't really believe in religion per se , but they miss the silly ritualism , dress codes , and liturgy .
It furthers the notion that adhering to some form of religion is better than agnosticism , atheism , or just plain being honest about what you do or do not believe.Freedom of religion is a great thing .
So rather than fight for fake faith rights , maybe we should fight for the right for an atheist or strongly agnostic politician to not have to lie about being a Christian just to be electable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe joining one of these new pseudo-religious religions (wicca, jedi, LaVey-style Satanism, whatever) isn't such a great idea.These sorts of religions aren't faiths.
They're social playgrounds for bored agnostics and atheists who don't really believe in religion per se, but they miss the silly ritualism, dress codes, and liturgy.
It furthers the notion that adhering to some form of religion is better than agnosticism, atheism, or just plain being honest about what you do or do not believe.Freedom of religion is a great thing.
So rather than fight for fake faith rights, maybe we should fight for the right for an atheist or strongly agnostic politician to not have to lie about being a Christian just to be electable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31507286</id>
	<title>Re:We Todd Dead</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268834820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Not to mention the Emperor already has a job, so he'd be unlikely to be in the job centre in the first place.</p></div><p>I beg to differ: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GSmsoZ79Rk</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention the Emperor already has a job , so he 'd be unlikely to be in the job centre in the first place.I beg to differ : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 8GSmsoZ79Rk</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention the Emperor already has a job, so he'd be unlikely to be in the job centre in the first place.I beg to differ: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GSmsoZ79Rk
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498518</id>
	<title>Sweet</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1268764980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'mm starting a nudist religion.</p><p>Then joining a snake handlers religion.</p><p>Then I 'mon, tues, weds, thrus is a sabbith so I can't work those days religion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I'mm starting a nudist religion.Then joining a snake handlers religion.Then I 'mon , tues , weds , thrus is a sabbith so I ca n't work those days religion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'mm starting a nudist religion.Then joining a snake handlers religion.Then I 'mon, tues, weds, thrus is a sabbith so I can't work those days religion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499068</id>
	<title>Damn</title>
	<author>elnyka</author>
	<datestamp>1268766960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>No matter how much people can stretch the definition of freedom of religion, this dude is the fucking dumbest dork I've seen/heard of in a long time. Goddamit, it's even painful to think of this type of dorkiness.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No matter how much people can stretch the definition of freedom of religion , this dude is the fucking dumbest dork I 've seen/heard of in a long time .
Goddamit , it 's even painful to think of this type of dorkiness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No matter how much people can stretch the definition of freedom of religion, this dude is the fucking dumbest dork I've seen/heard of in a long time.
Goddamit, it's even painful to think of this type of dorkiness.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499030</id>
	<title>Hard to Imagine</title>
	<author>BlueBoxSW.com</author>
	<datestamp>1268766840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hard to imagine why this guy is out of a job.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hard to imagine why this guy is out of a job .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hard to imagine why this guy is out of a job.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31509062</id>
	<title>Re:He could have fixed it with a wave of the hand</title>
	<author>digitig</author>
	<datestamp>1268843160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That was the alleged response of the <a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article2642956.ece" title="thesun.co.uk">Tesco supermarket</a> [thesun.co.uk] when faced with a similar situation. 'A Tesco spokesman said: "We would ask Jedis to remove hoods. Obi-Wan Kenobi, Yoda and Luke Skywalker all went hoodless without going to the Dark Side."'</p><p>A much better, not to mention more informed, response than the Job Centre's. I know it's reported in The Sun, but I do hope it was true.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That was the alleged response of the Tesco supermarket [ thesun.co.uk ] when faced with a similar situation .
'A Tesco spokesman said : " We would ask Jedis to remove hoods .
Obi-Wan Kenobi , Yoda and Luke Skywalker all went hoodless without going to the Dark Side .
" 'A much better , not to mention more informed , response than the Job Centre 's .
I know it 's reported in The Sun , but I do hope it was true .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was the alleged response of the Tesco supermarket [thesun.co.uk] when faced with a similar situation.
'A Tesco spokesman said: "We would ask Jedis to remove hoods.
Obi-Wan Kenobi, Yoda and Luke Skywalker all went hoodless without going to the Dark Side.
"'A much better, not to mention more informed, response than the Job Centre's.
I know it's reported in The Sun, but I do hope it was true.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31504600</id>
	<title>Re:What BS!</title>
	<author>kestasjk</author>
	<datestamp>1268757120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While you're reading doctrine online check out the Vatican's <a href="http://www.vatican.va/" title="vatican.va">webpage</a> [vatican.va]. It actually has an aged-parchment CSS background to look more sacred, it's so cute!</htmltext>
<tokenext>While you 're reading doctrine online check out the Vatican 's webpage [ vatican.va ] .
It actually has an aged-parchment CSS background to look more sacred , it 's so cute !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While you're reading doctrine online check out the Vatican's webpage [vatican.va].
It actually has an aged-parchment CSS background to look more sacred, it's so cute!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31501902</id>
	<title>Jedi Religion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268736420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps he's a member of the Jedi-an Peoples front or the Peoples front of Jedi's<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps he 's a member of the Jedi-an Peoples front or the Peoples front of Jedi 's : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps he's a member of the Jedi-an Peoples front or the Peoples front of Jedi's :D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498606</id>
	<title>i am a member of the church of predator v alien</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268765400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i find it highly objectionable that my government's employment agency won't let me skin my victims and hang them on trees or spit acid in their faces</p><p>plus i am REQUIRED to fight with the alternate of my form to the death. the police should get this memo and stop harassing me in my lawful pursuit of my religion</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i find it highly objectionable that my government 's employment agency wo n't let me skin my victims and hang them on trees or spit acid in their facesplus i am REQUIRED to fight with the alternate of my form to the death .
the police should get this memo and stop harassing me in my lawful pursuit of my religion</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i find it highly objectionable that my government's employment agency won't let me skin my victims and hang them on trees or spit acid in their facesplus i am REQUIRED to fight with the alternate of my form to the death.
the police should get this memo and stop harassing me in my lawful pursuit of my religion</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31503318</id>
	<title>Re:He could have fixed it with a wave of the hand</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268745000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, we respect people's religions here on Slashdot.  Now let me just go post some pastafarian flamebait...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , we respect people 's religions here on Slashdot .
Now let me just go post some pastafarian flamebait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, we respect people's religions here on Slashdot.
Now let me just go post some pastafarian flamebait...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31504066</id>
	<title>Re:He would also have a legitmate complaint in the</title>
	<author>AK Marc</author>
	<datestamp>1268752020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If this was in the US, he should walk in with his hoodie, get told to take it off, then sue for unequal protection under the law.  If there are exceptions made just for religion, and not just anyone that wants to wear headgear, then that person or group is receiving greater protections that I'm awarded.  If freedom of religion demands the laws/rules accommodate headgear, then equal protection demands that rule apply to everyone, and not just those that claim some personal affiliation with some other group.<br> <br>If equal protection doesn't apply, then we can just go back to separate but equal, as that's what we'd have if there was one rule for those of one faith, another for those of a different faith, and another for those of no faith.<br> <br>Yes, headgear is a stupid point to fight about it over, but it doesn't matter how "little" it is, the law is equal or not.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If this was in the US , he should walk in with his hoodie , get told to take it off , then sue for unequal protection under the law .
If there are exceptions made just for religion , and not just anyone that wants to wear headgear , then that person or group is receiving greater protections that I 'm awarded .
If freedom of religion demands the laws/rules accommodate headgear , then equal protection demands that rule apply to everyone , and not just those that claim some personal affiliation with some other group .
If equal protection does n't apply , then we can just go back to separate but equal , as that 's what we 'd have if there was one rule for those of one faith , another for those of a different faith , and another for those of no faith .
Yes , headgear is a stupid point to fight about it over , but it does n't matter how " little " it is , the law is equal or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this was in the US, he should walk in with his hoodie, get told to take it off, then sue for unequal protection under the law.
If there are exceptions made just for religion, and not just anyone that wants to wear headgear, then that person or group is receiving greater protections that I'm awarded.
If freedom of religion demands the laws/rules accommodate headgear, then equal protection demands that rule apply to everyone, and not just those that claim some personal affiliation with some other group.
If equal protection doesn't apply, then we can just go back to separate but equal, as that's what we'd have if there was one rule for those of one faith, another for those of a different faith, and another for those of no faith.
Yes, headgear is a stupid point to fight about it over, but it doesn't matter how "little" it is, the law is equal or not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499250</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268767740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"You Americans"<br><br>wow.... stereotype much? sounds like a racial slur, please comment back letting me know what country you're from so i can ignorantly disparage all of your people as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" You Americans " wow.... stereotype much ?
sounds like a racial slur , please comment back letting me know what country you 're from so i can ignorantly disparage all of your people as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"You Americans"wow.... stereotype much?
sounds like a racial slur, please comment back letting me know what country you're from so i can ignorantly disparage all of your people as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498674</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499132</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>pluther</author>
	<datestamp>1268767320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>In fact, they don't even have to file to be treated as tax exempt.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Holy crap!</p><p>
I was about to post to say you were full of shit on this one, so went to the IRS site to get a reference, and it turns out you're right.</p><p>
"Religious organizations" still have to do all the paperwork that regular non-profits do, but there's a special exemption for "churches" that waive all these requirements.  They don't even have to pay the $150 a year that we have to.</p><p>
The IRS has a handy <a href="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p1828.pdf" title="irs.gov">summary Q&amp;A</a> [irs.gov] explaining how it works.</p><p>
They have to obey certain rules, such as they're not allowed to transfer Church property to private individuals for less than market value (but nothing prohibits the church from owning a private jet that's used solely by Pat Robertson, for example).</p><p>
Also, the church is prohibited from spending a "substantial part of its activity" in attempting to influence legislation, nor may it interfere in political campaigns.  Of course, these rules are blatantly violated by large churches all the time.</p><p>
There's even special rules for churches limiting the IRS's authority to audit them.</p><p>
Damn.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In fact , they do n't even have to file to be treated as tax exempt .
Holy crap !
I was about to post to say you were full of shit on this one , so went to the IRS site to get a reference , and it turns out you 're right .
" Religious organizations " still have to do all the paperwork that regular non-profits do , but there 's a special exemption for " churches " that waive all these requirements .
They do n't even have to pay the $ 150 a year that we have to .
The IRS has a handy summary Q&amp;A [ irs.gov ] explaining how it works .
They have to obey certain rules , such as they 're not allowed to transfer Church property to private individuals for less than market value ( but nothing prohibits the church from owning a private jet that 's used solely by Pat Robertson , for example ) .
Also , the church is prohibited from spending a " substantial part of its activity " in attempting to influence legislation , nor may it interfere in political campaigns .
Of course , these rules are blatantly violated by large churches all the time .
There 's even special rules for churches limiting the IRS 's authority to audit them .
Damn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In fact, they don't even have to file to be treated as tax exempt.
Holy crap!
I was about to post to say you were full of shit on this one, so went to the IRS site to get a reference, and it turns out you're right.
"Religious organizations" still have to do all the paperwork that regular non-profits do, but there's a special exemption for "churches" that waive all these requirements.
They don't even have to pay the $150 a year that we have to.
The IRS has a handy summary Q&amp;A [irs.gov] explaining how it works.
They have to obey certain rules, such as they're not allowed to transfer Church property to private individuals for less than market value (but nothing prohibits the church from owning a private jet that's used solely by Pat Robertson, for example).
Also, the church is prohibited from spending a "substantial part of its activity" in attempting to influence legislation, nor may it interfere in political campaigns.
Of course, these rules are blatantly violated by large churches all the time.
There's even special rules for churches limiting the IRS's authority to audit them.
Damn.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498708</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498252</id>
	<title>***NEWSFLASH***</title>
	<author>pandrijeczko</author>
	<datestamp>1268763960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chris Jarvis, 31 year old Star Wars fan, finally gets laid and gets a life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chris Jarvis , 31 year old Star Wars fan , finally gets laid and gets a life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chris Jarvis, 31 year old Star Wars fan, finally gets laid and gets a life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499614</id>
	<title>31 years old ....</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1268769180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>31 years old and a Jedi<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... why oh why would he need to  be in a jobcentre?</p><p>I also wonder if he took the vow of celibacy - and whether it would make any difference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>31 years old and a Jedi ... why oh why would he need to be in a jobcentre ? I also wonder if he took the vow of celibacy - and whether it would make any difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>31 years old and a Jedi ... why oh why would he need to  be in a jobcentre?I also wonder if he took the vow of celibacy - and whether it would make any difference.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497964</id>
	<title>This belongs in IDLE.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268762820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's the point of having an Idle section if you never use it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the point of having an Idle section if you never use it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the point of having an Idle section if you never use it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499762</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, the Irony</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268769720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can see the basis of your complaint from your user name. So, tell me, is necromancy your religion, or just a hobby?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can see the basis of your complaint from your user name .
So , tell me , is necromancy your religion , or just a hobby ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can see the basis of your complaint from your user name.
So, tell me, is necromancy your religion, or just a hobby?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498130</id>
	<title>Oh, the Irony</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268763420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Star Wars and Jediism is accepted as a religion, but using marijuana for spiritual purposes is not accepted as a religion, even though the law permits the latter.<br>
Don't get me wrong - I love Star Wars, but this whole situation makes me a bit bitter.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Star Wars and Jediism is accepted as a religion , but using marijuana for spiritual purposes is not accepted as a religion , even though the law permits the latter .
Do n't get me wrong - I love Star Wars , but this whole situation makes me a bit bitter .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Star Wars and Jediism is accepted as a religion, but using marijuana for spiritual purposes is not accepted as a religion, even though the law permits the latter.
Don't get me wrong - I love Star Wars, but this whole situation makes me a bit bitter.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500662</id>
	<title>Re:He could have fixed it with a wave of the hand</title>
	<author>Macrat</author>
	<datestamp>1268730480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why, it's almost as if they were acting like immature twerps and that Jedi is not actually a real religion.
</p></div><p>There's a "real" religion?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why , it 's almost as if they were acting like immature twerps and that Jedi is not actually a real religion .
There 's a " real " religion ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why, it's almost as if they were acting like immature twerps and that Jedi is not actually a real religion.
There's a "real" religion?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31504646</id>
	<title>Re:Might not be PC, but...</title>
	<author>kestasjk</author>
	<datestamp>1268757480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At least it's based on an entertaining story with no intergalatic DC-9s on the one hand or talking donkeys on the other hand. (I literally laughed out loud when the donkey said "Am I not your faithful donkey?" in an audio-Bible I was listening to)</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least it 's based on an entertaining story with no intergalatic DC-9s on the one hand or talking donkeys on the other hand .
( I literally laughed out loud when the donkey said " Am I not your faithful donkey ?
" in an audio-Bible I was listening to )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least it's based on an entertaining story with no intergalatic DC-9s on the one hand or talking donkeys on the other hand.
(I literally laughed out loud when the donkey said "Am I not your faithful donkey?
" in an audio-Bible I was listening to)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500480</id>
	<title>Re:And This Is What's Wrong With The UK Today....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268772720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>so that shirkers like him can stay on the dole indefinitely without needing to make any effort to make themselves good prospects for employment.</p></div></blockquote><p>Nothing in the article or anything the guy said could possibly have given you this impression regarding his motivations.  It is entirely your invention.  A lie, in short.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>so that shirkers like him can stay on the dole indefinitely without needing to make any effort to make themselves good prospects for employment.Nothing in the article or anything the guy said could possibly have given you this impression regarding his motivations .
It is entirely your invention .
A lie , in short .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so that shirkers like him can stay on the dole indefinitely without needing to make any effort to make themselves good prospects for employment.Nothing in the article or anything the guy said could possibly have given you this impression regarding his motivations.
It is entirely your invention.
A lie, in short.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498368</id>
	<title>GROW UP</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268764380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you fucking idiot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you fucking idiot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you fucking idiot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499052</id>
	<title>And This Is What's Wrong With The UK Today....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268766900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... people like me who have to work for a living in order to pay taxes so that shirkers like him can stay on the dole indefinitely without needing to make any effort to make themselves good prospects for employment.</p><p>Personally, I'd stop his unemployment benefit there and then because he's quite clearly not using it as stop-gap while he seriously looks for work... and wasting the time of Job Centre staff when there are more deserving people out there who are *DESPERATE* to get a job.</p><p>Sometimes I despair at people these days...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... people like me who have to work for a living in order to pay taxes so that shirkers like him can stay on the dole indefinitely without needing to make any effort to make themselves good prospects for employment.Personally , I 'd stop his unemployment benefit there and then because he 's quite clearly not using it as stop-gap while he seriously looks for work... and wasting the time of Job Centre staff when there are more deserving people out there who are * DESPERATE * to get a job.Sometimes I despair at people these days.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... people like me who have to work for a living in order to pay taxes so that shirkers like him can stay on the dole indefinitely without needing to make any effort to make themselves good prospects for employment.Personally, I'd stop his unemployment benefit there and then because he's quite clearly not using it as stop-gap while he seriously looks for work... and wasting the time of Job Centre staff when there are more deserving people out there who are *DESPERATE* to get a job.Sometimes I despair at people these days...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500420</id>
	<title>Re:Chuch of Highlander</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268772480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and people are fighting tooth and nail to get in</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and people are fighting tooth and nail to get in</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and people are fighting tooth and nail to get in</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31540898</id>
	<title>Needs to be said</title>
	<author>hazydave</author>
	<datestamp>1269024060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This was clearly a test. If Jarvis were a true Jedi, his mind tricks would have worked just dandy on his coworkers, and no one would have questioned his wearing of the hood in the first place. Clearly, he's a pretender, just using the system to let him keep pretending. Similarly, I think high level Scientologists who can't fly or shoot mind bullets or whatever else they claim need to be exposed as pretenders. Science Fiction-based religions are hard enough to keep going, without fake followers adding to the problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This was clearly a test .
If Jarvis were a true Jedi , his mind tricks would have worked just dandy on his coworkers , and no one would have questioned his wearing of the hood in the first place .
Clearly , he 's a pretender , just using the system to let him keep pretending .
Similarly , I think high level Scientologists who ca n't fly or shoot mind bullets or whatever else they claim need to be exposed as pretenders .
Science Fiction-based religions are hard enough to keep going , without fake followers adding to the problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was clearly a test.
If Jarvis were a true Jedi, his mind tricks would have worked just dandy on his coworkers, and no one would have questioned his wearing of the hood in the first place.
Clearly, he's a pretender, just using the system to let him keep pretending.
Similarly, I think high level Scientologists who can't fly or shoot mind bullets or whatever else they claim need to be exposed as pretenders.
Science Fiction-based religions are hard enough to keep going, without fake followers adding to the problem.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499408</id>
	<title>Re:He could have fixed it with a wave of the hand</title>
	<author>Starfleet Command</author>
	<datestamp>1268768340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps he is actually a Sith masquerading as a Jedi.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps he is actually a Sith masquerading as a Jedi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps he is actually a Sith masquerading as a Jedi.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498616</id>
	<title>One can only wonder....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268765460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>why he is looking for a job.</p><p>Or even needs one if he is a Jedi.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>why he is looking for a job.Or even needs one if he is a Jedi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why he is looking for a job.Or even needs one if he is a Jedi.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498120</id>
	<title>He would also have a legitmate complaint in the US</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268763360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Under the ADA, discrimination against retards is unlawful here too!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Under the ADA , discrimination against retards is unlawful here too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Under the ADA, discrimination against retards is unlawful here too!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498628</id>
	<title>Re:Chuch of Highlander</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268765520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Does this mean I can carry a sword too!?</p></div><p>I'd rather join the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjUAJXDfj54" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Church of The One</a> [youtube.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean I can carry a sword too !
? I 'd rather join the Church of The One [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean I can carry a sword too!
?I'd rather join the Church of The One [youtube.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498396</id>
	<title>Re:Chuch of Highlander</title>
	<author>Whalou</author>
	<datestamp>1268764500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Church of Highlander can only have one member.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Church of Highlander can only have one member .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Church of Highlander can only have one member.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31505516</id>
	<title>Re:Chuch of Highlander</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268857740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've only got *one* member - am I in?</p><p>Am I in yet?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've only got * one * member - am I in ? Am I in yet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've only got *one* member - am I in?Am I in yet?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500296</id>
	<title>Re:He needs to go back to Jedi school.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268772000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Move along . . . Move along.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Move along .
. .
Move along .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Move along .
. .
Move along.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31501946</id>
	<title>Re:Religion is dangerous, not a plaything.</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1268736600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>we should fight for the right for an atheist or strongly agnostic politician to not have to lie about being a Christian just to be electable.</p></div><p>They already have that right.  Or are you proposing a law that would require people to not consider religion when voting, and if a religious reason is used to vote for someone, the voter will get a fine or larger punishment?  That would require non-anonymous voting for starters...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>we should fight for the right for an atheist or strongly agnostic politician to not have to lie about being a Christian just to be electable.They already have that right .
Or are you proposing a law that would require people to not consider religion when voting , and if a religious reason is used to vote for someone , the voter will get a fine or larger punishment ?
That would require non-anonymous voting for starters.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we should fight for the right for an atheist or strongly agnostic politician to not have to lie about being a Christian just to be electable.They already have that right.
Or are you proposing a law that would require people to not consider religion when voting, and if a religious reason is used to vote for someone, the voter will get a fine or larger punishment?
That would require non-anonymous voting for starters...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498674</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>aristotle-dude</author>
	<datestamp>1268765640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Shit, here in the US Churches don't even have to pay *tax*.  And of course, you can't be discriminated against based on your religion.  Nothing says you can't be discriminated against based on a lack of religion though.  Make no law respecting an establishment of religion, my ass.</p></div><p>Another fun fact. Charities do not pay tax either. You Americans hate social programs like universal health care so non-profit organizations like churches help the poor, sick and homeless when taxpayers like you are unwilling to pay the state to do it. The "Make no law respecting an establishment of religion" refers to a state religion like the Church of England. It does not prevent the state from co-operating with already established religions.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Shit , here in the US Churches do n't even have to pay * tax * .
And of course , you ca n't be discriminated against based on your religion .
Nothing says you ca n't be discriminated against based on a lack of religion though .
Make no law respecting an establishment of religion , my ass.Another fun fact .
Charities do not pay tax either .
You Americans hate social programs like universal health care so non-profit organizations like churches help the poor , sick and homeless when taxpayers like you are unwilling to pay the state to do it .
The " Make no law respecting an establishment of religion " refers to a state religion like the Church of England .
It does not prevent the state from co-operating with already established religions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shit, here in the US Churches don't even have to pay *tax*.
And of course, you can't be discriminated against based on your religion.
Nothing says you can't be discriminated against based on a lack of religion though.
Make no law respecting an establishment of religion, my ass.Another fun fact.
Charities do not pay tax either.
You Americans hate social programs like universal health care so non-profit organizations like churches help the poor, sick and homeless when taxpayers like you are unwilling to pay the state to do it.
The "Make no law respecting an establishment of religion" refers to a state religion like the Church of England.
It does not prevent the state from co-operating with already established religions.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31514258</id>
	<title>Re:What BS!</title>
	<author>anyGould</author>
	<datestamp>1268816580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's what, three this week?</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what , three this week ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what, three this week?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31506660</id>
	<title>Re:What BS!</title>
	<author>weber</author>
	<datestamp>1268829420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I followed the link I saw a Google add for Scientology at the top of the webpage, how funny is that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I followed the link I saw a Google add for Scientology at the top of the webpage , how funny is that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I followed the link I saw a Google add for Scientology at the top of the webpage, how funny is that?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31503370</id>
	<title>Re:Chuch of Highlander</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1268745300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I was a reenactor, we were told that we should tell the police that we were carrying (blunt) knives and swords for ceremonial religious purposes if we were stopped.  I never had the opportunity to test whether this worked - the police certainly didn't seem to object to our fighting in the park every week during the summer, nor my taking the bus to the local castle in the winter (it was closed to the public, but the reenactors got to use it one day a week for battle practice in exchange for providing people to collect money from tourists during the summer).</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was a reenactor , we were told that we should tell the police that we were carrying ( blunt ) knives and swords for ceremonial religious purposes if we were stopped .
I never had the opportunity to test whether this worked - the police certainly did n't seem to object to our fighting in the park every week during the summer , nor my taking the bus to the local castle in the winter ( it was closed to the public , but the reenactors got to use it one day a week for battle practice in exchange for providing people to collect money from tourists during the summer ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was a reenactor, we were told that we should tell the police that we were carrying (blunt) knives and swords for ceremonial religious purposes if we were stopped.
I never had the opportunity to test whether this worked - the police certainly didn't seem to object to our fighting in the park every week during the summer, nor my taking the bus to the local castle in the winter (it was closed to the public, but the reenactors got to use it one day a week for battle practice in exchange for providing people to collect money from tourists during the summer).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497940</id>
	<title>We Todd Dead</title>
	<author>Ambiguous Coward</author>
	<datestamp>1268762760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unbelievably stupid indeed. I see Jedis take off their hoods all the time in the movies. Why can't he? The only force-user who's adamant about keeping his hood on is the Emperor, in which case you'd best throw this guy down a shaft now and save us all a lot of trouble.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unbelievably stupid indeed .
I see Jedis take off their hoods all the time in the movies .
Why ca n't he ?
The only force-user who 's adamant about keeping his hood on is the Emperor , in which case you 'd best throw this guy down a shaft now and save us all a lot of trouble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unbelievably stupid indeed.
I see Jedis take off their hoods all the time in the movies.
Why can't he?
The only force-user who's adamant about keeping his hood on is the Emperor, in which case you'd best throw this guy down a shaft now and save us all a lot of trouble.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499202</id>
	<title>Re:What BS!</title>
	<author>Cytotoxic</author>
	<datestamp>1268767560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Check the article and the sidebar link to another jedi church article.  This is a tongue in cheek protest against Islamic headdress requirements and exceptions made for their faith.  Both articles mention Muslim women wearing their headdress in the same establishment - so this is their way of grinding that axe.  Judging by their age, appearance and employment status, I would wager that there's a bit of anti-immigrant xenophobia involved in their attitudes, but the reporters mercifully didn't give them a soapbox for any unrelated preaching.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Check the article and the sidebar link to another jedi church article .
This is a tongue in cheek protest against Islamic headdress requirements and exceptions made for their faith .
Both articles mention Muslim women wearing their headdress in the same establishment - so this is their way of grinding that axe .
Judging by their age , appearance and employment status , I would wager that there 's a bit of anti-immigrant xenophobia involved in their attitudes , but the reporters mercifully did n't give them a soapbox for any unrelated preaching .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Check the article and the sidebar link to another jedi church article.
This is a tongue in cheek protest against Islamic headdress requirements and exceptions made for their faith.
Both articles mention Muslim women wearing their headdress in the same establishment - so this is their way of grinding that axe.
Judging by their age, appearance and employment status, I would wager that there's a bit of anti-immigrant xenophobia involved in their attitudes, but the reporters mercifully didn't give them a soapbox for any unrelated preaching.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499284</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>CAIMLAS</author>
	<datestamp>1268767860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My family is a non-profit organization, but I'm told I still have to pay tax. I make a living - a wage - not income or a profit.</p><p>If I were to incorporate myself, it might be another story. But I haven't, so it isn't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My family is a non-profit organization , but I 'm told I still have to pay tax .
I make a living - a wage - not income or a profit.If I were to incorporate myself , it might be another story .
But I have n't , so it is n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My family is a non-profit organization, but I'm told I still have to pay tax.
I make a living - a wage - not income or a profit.If I were to incorporate myself, it might be another story.
But I haven't, so it isn't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499716</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268769540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>YEAH!</p><p>Why do you think L Ron Hubbard started Scientology? Look it up. He was a convicted tax evader. Then he found a loophole.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>YEAH ! Why do you think L Ron Hubbard started Scientology ?
Look it up .
He was a convicted tax evader .
Then he found a loophole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>YEAH!Why do you think L Ron Hubbard started Scientology?
Look it up.
He was a convicted tax evader.
Then he found a loophole.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497948</id>
	<title>Wave your hand and say:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268762760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I am not the unbelievably stupid asshole you are looking for.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am not the unbelievably stupid asshole you are looking for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am not the unbelievably stupid asshole you are looking for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498366</id>
	<title>Re:What BS!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268764380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And thus began the great jedi schism of 2010, when hoodie fundemenatalists were cast out of the light of the one true force and were forced to found a new order referred to derisively as "the dark side".</p><p>In my books, if you can have people this upset over doctrine, you are indeed qualified to call yourself a religion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And thus began the great jedi schism of 2010 , when hoodie fundemenatalists were cast out of the light of the one true force and were forced to found a new order referred to derisively as " the dark side " .In my books , if you can have people this upset over doctrine , you are indeed qualified to call yourself a religion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And thus began the great jedi schism of 2010, when hoodie fundemenatalists were cast out of the light of the one true force and were forced to found a new order referred to derisively as "the dark side".In my books, if you can have people this upset over doctrine, you are indeed qualified to call yourself a religion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498692</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268765700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yeah, but churches are for-prophet organizations...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah , but churches are for-prophet organizations.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah, but churches are for-prophet organizations...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31502854</id>
	<title>We?</title>
	<author>jotaeleemeese</author>
	<datestamp>1268741580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As the US uninsured, uninsurable  or bankrupt due to health bills?</p><p>I am sure they are loving it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As the US uninsured , uninsurable or bankrupt due to health bills ? I am sure they are loving it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As the US uninsured, uninsurable  or bankrupt due to health bills?I am sure they are loving it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500146</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268771340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait... did you just claim that the Catholic Church is non-profit?</p><p>BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!</p><p>Shit, I want some of what you're smoking.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait... did you just claim that the Catholic Church is non-profit ? BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! !
! Shit , I want some of what you 're smoking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait... did you just claim that the Catholic Church is non-profit?BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
!Shit, I want some of what you're smoking.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498600</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1268765340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500290</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>darkmeridian</author>
	<datestamp>1268771940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Churches can run for-profit ventures and not pay taxes. For instance, all of the daycare centers in my neighborhood are structured as churches. They get leeway on zoning so they can build bigger structures. The income they make on the daycares are not taxable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Churches can run for-profit ventures and not pay taxes .
For instance , all of the daycare centers in my neighborhood are structured as churches .
They get leeway on zoning so they can build bigger structures .
The income they make on the daycares are not taxable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Churches can run for-profit ventures and not pay taxes.
For instance, all of the daycare centers in my neighborhood are structured as churches.
They get leeway on zoning so they can build bigger structures.
The income they make on the daycares are not taxable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499118</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, the Irony</title>
	<author>BoppreH</author>
	<datestamp>1268767200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think you misunderstood the concept of "The Force".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you misunderstood the concept of " The Force " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you misunderstood the concept of "The Force".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31506196</id>
	<title>Re:And This Is What's Wrong With The UK Today....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268823480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, if you classify a "Daily Wail reader" as someone who is sick &amp; tired of supporting scroungers &amp; fiddlers whilst not actually reading the Daily Mail, then I guess I am one of those...</p><p>There are people in this country who are genuinely ill &amp; genuinely unemployed who need support from the benefit system and, as a socialist at heart, I have no problem with that whatsoever. However, someone with a moral conscience and self worth would not feel comfortable being on jobless benefits and would therefore be going balls out to find another job - I am sure there are many many people currently doing that in this country and I wish them every success.</p><p>However, someone who uses some joke religion to act like a pratt and get thrown out of a job centre is quite clearly NOT serious about getting a job and therefore I strongly object to that person being supported through my taxes.</p><p>If you yourself lack a moral conscience to understand that from what I've written then that's your problem. The benefits system is a great thing and it's something this country should be very proud of as being caring enough to not let it's citizens suffer great poverty &amp; hardship when they desperately need it - but at the same time, it is not there to be abused by jokers who think life is one big long joke.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if you classify a " Daily Wail reader " as someone who is sick &amp; tired of supporting scroungers &amp; fiddlers whilst not actually reading the Daily Mail , then I guess I am one of those...There are people in this country who are genuinely ill &amp; genuinely unemployed who need support from the benefit system and , as a socialist at heart , I have no problem with that whatsoever .
However , someone with a moral conscience and self worth would not feel comfortable being on jobless benefits and would therefore be going balls out to find another job - I am sure there are many many people currently doing that in this country and I wish them every success.However , someone who uses some joke religion to act like a pratt and get thrown out of a job centre is quite clearly NOT serious about getting a job and therefore I strongly object to that person being supported through my taxes.If you yourself lack a moral conscience to understand that from what I 've written then that 's your problem .
The benefits system is a great thing and it 's something this country should be very proud of as being caring enough to not let it 's citizens suffer great poverty &amp; hardship when they desperately need it - but at the same time , it is not there to be abused by jokers who think life is one big long joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if you classify a "Daily Wail reader" as someone who is sick &amp; tired of supporting scroungers &amp; fiddlers whilst not actually reading the Daily Mail, then I guess I am one of those...There are people in this country who are genuinely ill &amp; genuinely unemployed who need support from the benefit system and, as a socialist at heart, I have no problem with that whatsoever.
However, someone with a moral conscience and self worth would not feel comfortable being on jobless benefits and would therefore be going balls out to find another job - I am sure there are many many people currently doing that in this country and I wish them every success.However, someone who uses some joke religion to act like a pratt and get thrown out of a job centre is quite clearly NOT serious about getting a job and therefore I strongly object to that person being supported through my taxes.If you yourself lack a moral conscience to understand that from what I've written then that's your problem.
The benefits system is a great thing and it's something this country should be very proud of as being caring enough to not let it's citizens suffer great poverty &amp; hardship when they desperately need it - but at the same time, it is not there to be abused by jokers who think life is one big long joke.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31505984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497896</id>
	<title>He could have fixed it with a wave of the hand</title>
	<author>spun</author>
	<datestamp>1268762520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"These are not the dorks you are looking for."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" These are not the dorks you are looking for .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"These are not the dorks you are looking for.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498346</id>
	<title>Re:He could have fixed it with a wave of the hand</title>
	<author>Anonymous Monkey</author>
	<datestamp>1268764260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>This strikes me as an HR employee seeing some one being a complete Idiot and deserving to get several books thrown at him, and instead thinking "I'm just going to say I'm sorry and let this whole thing go, it's not worth shouting over, even though I'm right."  If more people were this mature the world would have a lot fewer needless arguments in it.  Just letting things go, too bad more people don't do it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This strikes me as an HR employee seeing some one being a complete Idiot and deserving to get several books thrown at him , and instead thinking " I 'm just going to say I 'm sorry and let this whole thing go , it 's not worth shouting over , even though I 'm right .
" If more people were this mature the world would have a lot fewer needless arguments in it .
Just letting things go , too bad more people do n't do it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This strikes me as an HR employee seeing some one being a complete Idiot and deserving to get several books thrown at him, and instead thinking "I'm just going to say I'm sorry and let this whole thing go, it's not worth shouting over, even though I'm right.
"  If more people were this mature the world would have a lot fewer needless arguments in it.
Just letting things go, too bad more people don't do it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498930</id>
	<title>Basement receive tax exempt status</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268766480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a regular meeting place for their religion basements shall become tax exempt property. Unlike Catholic Priests Jedi Masters can marry just so far none of them have met any girls.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a regular meeting place for their religion basements shall become tax exempt property .
Unlike Catholic Priests Jedi Masters can marry just so far none of them have met any girls .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a regular meeting place for their religion basements shall become tax exempt property.
Unlike Catholic Priests Jedi Masters can marry just so far none of them have met any girls.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499210</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268767620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You Americans hate social programs like universal health care so non-profit organizations like churches help the poor, sick and homeless when taxpayers like you are unwilling to pay the state to do it.</p></div><p>You sound bitter...</p><p>That is exactly how it was intended to be, and we like it that way. Thanks.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You Americans hate social programs like universal health care so non-profit organizations like churches help the poor , sick and homeless when taxpayers like you are unwilling to pay the state to do it.You sound bitter...That is exactly how it was intended to be , and we like it that way .
Thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You Americans hate social programs like universal health care so non-profit organizations like churches help the poor, sick and homeless when taxpayers like you are unwilling to pay the state to do it.You sound bitter...That is exactly how it was intended to be, and we like it that way.
Thanks.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498674</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498272</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1268764020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No non-profit organizations in the United States have to pay taxes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No non-profit organizations in the United States have to pay taxes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No non-profit organizations in the United States have to pay taxes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499224</id>
	<title>Re:Chuch of Highlander</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268767620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...eventually</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...eventually</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...eventually</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499282</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>amplt1337</author>
	<datestamp>1268767800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which is why religious organizations should not be blanket exempt; entirely too many are run for the profit of the pastors or church hierarchy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which is why religious organizations should not be blanket exempt ; entirely too many are run for the profit of the pastors or church hierarchy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which is why religious organizations should not be blanket exempt; entirely too many are run for the profit of the pastors or church hierarchy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500622</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268730300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>-1: Troll Douche</htmltext>
<tokenext>-1 : Troll Douche</tokentext>
<sentencetext>-1: Troll Douche</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497974</id>
	<title>Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268762820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>For some reason in the UK we have exceptions for certain laws if you are a member of a religion. For instance, if you are a Sikh you are allowed to use a motorbike without a helmet since you have a turban in the way (although to be honest, in that case your violation doesn't harm anyone else). In a more outrageous exception, churches are allowed, when choosing a candidate for a job, to discriminate against gays and in the Catholic church's case women. It's one rule for us, and another for them. As the gentleman in the article has demonstrated this is extremely silly. Who defines what a religion is?</htmltext>
<tokenext>For some reason in the UK we have exceptions for certain laws if you are a member of a religion .
For instance , if you are a Sikh you are allowed to use a motorbike without a helmet since you have a turban in the way ( although to be honest , in that case your violation does n't harm anyone else ) .
In a more outrageous exception , churches are allowed , when choosing a candidate for a job , to discriminate against gays and in the Catholic church 's case women .
It 's one rule for us , and another for them .
As the gentleman in the article has demonstrated this is extremely silly .
Who defines what a religion is ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For some reason in the UK we have exceptions for certain laws if you are a member of a religion.
For instance, if you are a Sikh you are allowed to use a motorbike without a helmet since you have a turban in the way (although to be honest, in that case your violation doesn't harm anyone else).
In a more outrageous exception, churches are allowed, when choosing a candidate for a job, to discriminate against gays and in the Catholic church's case women.
It's one rule for us, and another for them.
As the gentleman in the article has demonstrated this is extremely silly.
Who defines what a religion is?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31505766</id>
	<title>Re:He could have fixed it with a wave of the hand</title>
	<author>icannotthinkofaname</author>
	<datestamp>1268818440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm pretty sure a Jedi would remove his hood when asked to after entering a building, specifically one run by the local government. All the Jedi characters I remember were pretty polite.</p></div><p>I think you're right.  In fact, I'm pretty sure the Jedi removed their hoods when dealing with other people in general (not necessarily needing to be asked to do so), much like how a man doffs his hat as a sign of respect.</p><p>That settles it.  This man must be a Sith Lord if he would forget such basic manners.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure a Jedi would remove his hood when asked to after entering a building , specifically one run by the local government .
All the Jedi characters I remember were pretty polite.I think you 're right .
In fact , I 'm pretty sure the Jedi removed their hoods when dealing with other people in general ( not necessarily needing to be asked to do so ) , much like how a man doffs his hat as a sign of respect.That settles it .
This man must be a Sith Lord if he would forget such basic manners .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure a Jedi would remove his hood when asked to after entering a building, specifically one run by the local government.
All the Jedi characters I remember were pretty polite.I think you're right.
In fact, I'm pretty sure the Jedi removed their hoods when dealing with other people in general (not necessarily needing to be asked to do so), much like how a man doffs his hat as a sign of respect.That settles it.
This man must be a Sith Lord if he would forget such basic manners.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498622</id>
	<title>Re:We Todd Dead</title>
	<author>cpscotti</author>
	<datestamp>1268765460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As far as I remember, the emperor takes off his hood sometimes also: <a href="http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/147161/VATICAN-GAY-SEX-SCANDAL-PIC.jpg" title="huffingtonpost.com" rel="nofollow">http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/147161/VATICAN-GAY-SEX-SCANDAL-PIC.jpg</a> [huffingtonpost.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>As far as I remember , the emperor takes off his hood sometimes also : http : //images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/147161/VATICAN-GAY-SEX-SCANDAL-PIC.jpg [ huffingtonpost.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As far as I remember, the emperor takes off his hood sometimes also: http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/147161/VATICAN-GAY-SEX-SCANDAL-PIC.jpg [huffingtonpost.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500220</id>
	<title>Re:freeballer</title>
	<author>tick\_and\_bash</author>
	<datestamp>1268771700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How sad, that someone is so stuck on an old book they pretend it's a religion.<br>Its not discriminating against religion, because much like all others, its made up!</p><p>See what I did there?  Just because you don't agree with the origin of a religion, doesn't make it any less valid than yours.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How sad , that someone is so stuck on an old book they pretend it 's a religion.Its not discriminating against religion , because much like all others , its made up ! See what I did there ?
Just because you do n't agree with the origin of a religion , does n't make it any less valid than yours .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How sad, that someone is so stuck on an old book they pretend it's a religion.Its not discriminating against religion, because much like all others, its made up!See what I did there?
Just because you don't agree with the origin of a religion, doesn't make it any less valid than yours.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498364</id>
	<title>f...ing dorks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268764380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Get a life...  There is no force.  Jesus will safe you from redemption.  Jesus F. C. is the way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Get a life... There is no force .
Jesus will safe you from redemption .
Jesus F. C. is the way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get a life...  There is no force.
Jesus will safe you from redemption.
Jesus F. C. is the way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31503556</id>
	<title>Re:Religion is dangerous, not a plaything.</title>
	<author>Shimbo</author>
	<datestamp>1268746920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So rather than fight for fake faith rights, maybe we should fight for the right for an atheist or strongly agnostic politician to not have to lie about being a Christian just to be electable.</p></div><p>To be honest, I don't think it really makes much of a difference. It's really not something politicians tend to talk about much.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So rather than fight for fake faith rights , maybe we should fight for the right for an atheist or strongly agnostic politician to not have to lie about being a Christian just to be electable.To be honest , I do n't think it really makes much of a difference .
It 's really not something politicians tend to talk about much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So rather than fight for fake faith rights, maybe we should fight for the right for an atheist or strongly agnostic politician to not have to lie about being a Christian just to be electable.To be honest, I don't think it really makes much of a difference.
It's really not something politicians tend to talk about much.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498990</id>
	<title>Re:He could have fixed it with a wave of the hand</title>
	<author>Brett Buck</author>
	<datestamp>1268766720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I'm by no means even close to being so dedicated a fan, but I'm pretty sure a Jedi would remove his hood when asked to after entering a building, specifically one run by the local government. All the Jedi characters I remember were pretty polite. Also, I don't recall many complaint forms being filled out.</p></div></blockquote><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Why, it's almost as if they were acting like immature twerps and that Jedi is not actually a real religion.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Brett</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm by no means even close to being so dedicated a fan , but I 'm pretty sure a Jedi would remove his hood when asked to after entering a building , specifically one run by the local government .
All the Jedi characters I remember were pretty polite .
Also , I do n't recall many complaint forms being filled out .
          Why , it 's almost as if they were acting like immature twerps and that Jedi is not actually a real religion .
            Brett</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm by no means even close to being so dedicated a fan, but I'm pretty sure a Jedi would remove his hood when asked to after entering a building, specifically one run by the local government.
All the Jedi characters I remember were pretty polite.
Also, I don't recall many complaint forms being filled out.
          Why, it's almost as if they were acting like immature twerps and that Jedi is not actually a real religion.
            Brett
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498708</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1268765760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First of all, not all non-profit organizations are tax exempt.</p><p>Second, non-profit organizations that are tax exempt have to prove that they're non-profit by disclosing their finances. That is, except churches, who are considered non-profit on religious grounds, and don't even have to disclose finances to their members, much less anyone else. In fact, they don't even have to file to be treated as tax exempt.</p><p>Then again, whether churches are even non-profit is also very much arguable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First of all , not all non-profit organizations are tax exempt.Second , non-profit organizations that are tax exempt have to prove that they 're non-profit by disclosing their finances .
That is , except churches , who are considered non-profit on religious grounds , and do n't even have to disclose finances to their members , much less anyone else .
In fact , they do n't even have to file to be treated as tax exempt.Then again , whether churches are even non-profit is also very much arguable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First of all, not all non-profit organizations are tax exempt.Second, non-profit organizations that are tax exempt have to prove that they're non-profit by disclosing their finances.
That is, except churches, who are considered non-profit on religious grounds, and don't even have to disclose finances to their members, much less anyone else.
In fact, they don't even have to file to be treated as tax exempt.Then again, whether churches are even non-profit is also very much arguable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500752</id>
	<title>schisms</title>
	<author>Alan R Light</author>
	<datestamp>1268730960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Presumably there has been a schism, and the Jedis in the movies belong to a different sect that does not require headgear.

</p><p>Much like the difference between Mennonite women and Baptist women - one requires headgear, one does not, but both are not only Christian but Protestant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Presumably there has been a schism , and the Jedis in the movies belong to a different sect that does not require headgear .
Much like the difference between Mennonite women and Baptist women - one requires headgear , one does not , but both are not only Christian but Protestant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Presumably there has been a schism, and the Jedis in the movies belong to a different sect that does not require headgear.
Much like the difference between Mennonite women and Baptist women - one requires headgear, one does not, but both are not only Christian but Protestant.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31510330</id>
	<title>JEDI</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268847720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>NERDS!</htmltext>
<tokenext>NERDS !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NERDS!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31504002</id>
	<title>Re:What BS!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268751540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well I assumed he did this to show that religious exceptions are stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well I assumed he did this to show that religious exceptions are stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well I assumed he did this to show that religious exceptions are stupid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498538</id>
	<title>freeballer</title>
	<author>freeballer</author>
	<datestamp>1268765100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How sad, that someone is so stuck on an old movie they pretent its a religion.<br>Its not discriminating against religion, because much like all others, its made up!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How sad , that someone is so stuck on an old movie they pretent its a religion.Its not discriminating against religion , because much like all others , its made up !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How sad, that someone is so stuck on an old movie they pretent its a religion.Its not discriminating against religion, because much like all others, its made up!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499466</id>
	<title>Re:We Todd Dead</title>
	<author>eln</author>
	<datestamp>1268768580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe he's looking for a job that follows OSHA requirements better.  I can't imagine being that old and having your chair at the top of a flight of stairs is pleasant...not to mention the open pit in his office.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe he 's looking for a job that follows OSHA requirements better .
I ca n't imagine being that old and having your chair at the top of a flight of stairs is pleasant...not to mention the open pit in his office .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe he's looking for a job that follows OSHA requirements better.
I can't imagine being that old and having your chair at the top of a flight of stairs is pleasant...not to mention the open pit in his office.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498048</id>
	<title>Chuch of Highlander</title>
	<author>Mekkah</author>
	<datestamp>1268763120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does this mean I can carry a sword too!?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean I can carry a sword too !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean I can carry a sword too!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498724</id>
	<title>Re:He could have fixed it with a wave of the hand</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268765760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt;&gt;All the Jedi characters I remember were pretty polite. Also, I don't recall many complaint forms being filled out.
<br> <br>
That's what religion ends up being about though.  Not about practicing what you believe in and about what is right, but thinking you are better and whining so you can basically do whatever you feel like.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; All the Jedi characters I remember were pretty polite .
Also , I do n't recall many complaint forms being filled out .
That 's what religion ends up being about though .
Not about practicing what you believe in and about what is right , but thinking you are better and whining so you can basically do whatever you feel like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;All the Jedi characters I remember were pretty polite.
Also, I don't recall many complaint forms being filled out.
That's what religion ends up being about though.
Not about practicing what you believe in and about what is right, but thinking you are better and whining so you can basically do whatever you feel like.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500396</id>
	<title>Re:He could have fixed it with a wave of the hand</title>
	<author>Gerafix</author>
	<datestamp>1268772360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What is a "real" religion? One that assumes bullshit that a lot of people believe?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What is a " real " religion ?
One that assumes bullshit that a lot of people believe ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is a "real" religion?
One that assumes bullshit that a lot of people believe?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498966</id>
	<title>Re:Chuch of Highlander</title>
	<author>Nick Number</author>
	<datestamp>1268766600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Does this mean I can carry a sword too!?</p></div><p>You might not need it; if you can get someone to worship the ground you walk on then immortals won't be allowed to fight you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean I can carry a sword too !
? You might not need it ; if you can get someone to worship the ground you walk on then immortals wo n't be allowed to fight you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean I can carry a sword too!
?You might not need it; if you can get someone to worship the ground you walk on then immortals won't be allowed to fight you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31501806</id>
	<title>Re:What BS!</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1268736060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Clearly he has the ability to cloud the minds of the stupid to get his way, and he might possess limited telekinetic abilities which are range-limited to touch-only.  "Watch as I lift this book"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly he has the ability to cloud the minds of the stupid to get his way , and he might possess limited telekinetic abilities which are range-limited to touch-only .
" Watch as I lift this book "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly he has the ability to cloud the minds of the stupid to get his way, and he might possess limited telekinetic abilities which are range-limited to touch-only.
"Watch as I lift this book"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498200</id>
	<title>Re:We Todd Dead</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268763780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The point is that it's just as sensible as any other religious symbol someone refuses to remove...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The point is that it 's just as sensible as any other religious symbol someone refuses to remove.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The point is that it's just as sensible as any other religious symbol someone refuses to remove...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31506128</id>
	<title>Re:What BS!</title>
	<author>julesh</author>
	<datestamp>1268822940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>http://www.jedichurch.org/jedi-doctrine.html</i></p><p>That's the plain-old Jedi Church.  This guy's <i>International Jedi Church</i>, who don't appear to have a web page.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.jedichurch.org/jedi-doctrine.htmlThat 's the plain-old Jedi Church .
This guy 's International Jedi Church , who do n't appear to have a web page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.jedichurch.org/jedi-doctrine.htmlThat's the plain-old Jedi Church.
This guy's International Jedi Church, who don't appear to have a web page.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31502042</id>
	<title>Re:We Todd Dead</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268737140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That would make a good youtube video.</p><p>"What are your skills?"<br>"Using the force for evil."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That would make a good youtube video .
" What are your skills ?
" " Using the force for evil .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would make a good youtube video.
"What are your skills?
""Using the force for evil.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498172</id>
	<title>Ronjeremism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268763660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My religion is based on cheesy pornos from the eighties. My dress code requires attractive secretaries to take their clothes OFF. Don't oppose my beliefs!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My religion is based on cheesy pornos from the eighties .
My dress code requires attractive secretaries to take their clothes OFF .
Do n't oppose my beliefs !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My religion is based on cheesy pornos from the eighties.
My dress code requires attractive secretaries to take their clothes OFF.
Don't oppose my beliefs!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498072</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>agnosticanarch</author>
	<datestamp>1268763240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank you for stating the obviousness that so many other of our Slashdot brethren are apparently being completely WHOOOSHED by!</p><p>~AA</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you for stating the obviousness that so many other of our Slashdot brethren are apparently being completely WHOOOSHED by ! ~ AA</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you for stating the obviousness that so many other of our Slashdot brethren are apparently being completely WHOOOSHED by!~AA</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31502784</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268741280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You Americans hate social programs like universal health care so non-profit organizations like churches help the poor, sick and homeless when taxpayers like you are unwilling to pay the state to do it.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.</p></div><p>&ldquo;We voted for that plan at a big meeting, with all of us present, six thousand of us, everybody that worked in the factory. The [President] made long speeches about it, and it wasn&rsquo;t too clear, but nobody asked any questions. None of us knew just how the plan would work, but every one of us thought that the next fellow knew it. And if anybody had doubts, he felt guilty and kept his mouth shut &ndash; because they made it sound like anyone who&rsquo;d oppose the plan was a child-killer at heart and less than a human being. They told us that this plan would achieve a noble ideal. Well, how were we to know otherwise? Hadn&rsquo;t we heard it all our lives &ndash; from our parents and our schoolteachers and our ministers, and in every newspaper we ever read and every movie and every public speech? Hadn&rsquo;t we always been told that this was righteous and just?</p><p>&ldquo;Do you know how it worked, that plan, and what it did to people? Try pouring water into a tank where there&rsquo;s a pipe at the bottom draining it out faster than you pour it, and each bucket you bring breaks that pipe an inch wider, and the harder you work the more is demanded of you, and you stand slinging buckets forty hours a week, then forthy-eight, then fifty-six &ndash; for your neighbor&rsquo;s supper &ndash; for his wife&rsquo;s operation &ndash; for his child&rsquo;s measles &ndash; for his mother&rsquo;s wheel chair &ndash; for his uncle&rsquo;s shirt &ndash; for his nephew&rsquo;s schooling &ndash; for the baby next door &ndash; for the baby to be born &ndash; for anyone anywhere around you &ndash; it&rsquo;s theirs to receive, from diapers to dentures &ndash; and yours to work, from sunup to sundown, month after month, year after year, with nothing to show for it but your sweat, with nothing in sight for you but their pleasure, for the whole of your life, without rest, without hope, without end From each according to his ability, to each according to his need</p><p>&ldquo;What was it we were supposed to work for? For the love of our brothers? What brothers? For the bums, the loafers, the moochers we saw all around us? And whether they were cheating or plain incompetent, whether they were unwilling or unable &ndash; what difference did that make to us? If we were tied for life to the level of their unfitness, faked or real, how long could we care to go on? We had no way of knowing their ability, we had no way of controlling their needs &ndash; all we knew was that we were beasts of burden struggling blindly in some sort of place that was half-hospital, half-stockyards &ndash; a place geared to nothing but disability, disaster, disease &ndash; beasts put there for the relief of whatever whoever chose to say was whichever&rsquo;s need.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You Americans hate social programs like universal health care so non-profit organizations like churches help the poor , sick and homeless when taxpayers like you are unwilling to pay the state to do it .
.    We voted for that plan at a big meeting , with all of us present , six thousand of us , everybody that worked in the factory .
The [ President ] made long speeches about it , and it wasn    t too clear , but nobody asked any questions .
None of us knew just how the plan would work , but every one of us thought that the next fellow knew it .
And if anybody had doubts , he felt guilty and kept his mouth shut    because they made it sound like anyone who    d oppose the plan was a child-killer at heart and less than a human being .
They told us that this plan would achieve a noble ideal .
Well , how were we to know otherwise ?
Hadn    t we heard it all our lives    from our parents and our schoolteachers and our ministers , and in every newspaper we ever read and every movie and every public speech ?
Hadn    t we always been told that this was righteous and just ?    Do you know how it worked , that plan , and what it did to people ?
Try pouring water into a tank where there    s a pipe at the bottom draining it out faster than you pour it , and each bucket you bring breaks that pipe an inch wider , and the harder you work the more is demanded of you , and you stand slinging buckets forty hours a week , then forthy-eight , then fifty-six    for your neighbor    s supper    for his wife    s operation    for his child    s measles    for his mother    s wheel chair    for his uncle    s shirt    for his nephew    s schooling    for the baby next door    for the baby to be born    for anyone anywhere around you    it    s theirs to receive , from diapers to dentures    and yours to work , from sunup to sundown , month after month , year after year , with nothing to show for it but your sweat , with nothing in sight for you but their pleasure , for the whole of your life , without rest , without hope , without end From each according to his ability , to each according to his need    What was it we were supposed to work for ?
For the love of our brothers ?
What brothers ?
For the bums , the loafers , the moochers we saw all around us ?
And whether they were cheating or plain incompetent , whether they were unwilling or unable    what difference did that make to us ?
If we were tied for life to the level of their unfitness , faked or real , how long could we care to go on ?
We had no way of knowing their ability , we had no way of controlling their needs    all we knew was that we were beasts of burden struggling blindly in some sort of place that was half-hospital , half-stockyards    a place geared to nothing but disability , disaster , disease    beasts put there for the relief of whatever whoever chose to say was whichever    s need .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You Americans hate social programs like universal health care so non-profit organizations like churches help the poor, sick and homeless when taxpayers like you are unwilling to pay the state to do it.
.“We voted for that plan at a big meeting, with all of us present, six thousand of us, everybody that worked in the factory.
The [President] made long speeches about it, and it wasn’t too clear, but nobody asked any questions.
None of us knew just how the plan would work, but every one of us thought that the next fellow knew it.
And if anybody had doubts, he felt guilty and kept his mouth shut – because they made it sound like anyone who’d oppose the plan was a child-killer at heart and less than a human being.
They told us that this plan would achieve a noble ideal.
Well, how were we to know otherwise?
Hadn’t we heard it all our lives – from our parents and our schoolteachers and our ministers, and in every newspaper we ever read and every movie and every public speech?
Hadn’t we always been told that this was righteous and just?“Do you know how it worked, that plan, and what it did to people?
Try pouring water into a tank where there’s a pipe at the bottom draining it out faster than you pour it, and each bucket you bring breaks that pipe an inch wider, and the harder you work the more is demanded of you, and you stand slinging buckets forty hours a week, then forthy-eight, then fifty-six – for your neighbor’s supper – for his wife’s operation – for his child’s measles – for his mother’s wheel chair – for his uncle’s shirt – for his nephew’s schooling – for the baby next door – for the baby to be born – for anyone anywhere around you – it’s theirs to receive, from diapers to dentures – and yours to work, from sunup to sundown, month after month, year after year, with nothing to show for it but your sweat, with nothing in sight for you but their pleasure, for the whole of your life, without rest, without hope, without end From each according to his ability, to each according to his need“What was it we were supposed to work for?
For the love of our brothers?
What brothers?
For the bums, the loafers, the moochers we saw all around us?
And whether they were cheating or plain incompetent, whether they were unwilling or unable – what difference did that make to us?
If we were tied for life to the level of their unfitness, faked or real, how long could we care to go on?
We had no way of knowing their ability, we had no way of controlling their needs – all we knew was that we were beasts of burden struggling blindly in some sort of place that was half-hospital, half-stockyards – a place geared to nothing but disability, disaster, disease – beasts put there for the relief of whatever whoever chose to say was whichever’s need.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498674</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499524</id>
	<title>Job Centre eh?....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268768880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't imagine why this guy is looking for a job. He obviously seems like a competent and well-balanced individual who would likely be a joy to work with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't imagine why this guy is looking for a job .
He obviously seems like a competent and well-balanced individual who would likely be a joy to work with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't imagine why this guy is looking for a job.
He obviously seems like a competent and well-balanced individual who would likely be a joy to work with.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500400</id>
	<title>Re:He needs to go back to Jedi school.</title>
	<author>StormReaver</author>
	<datestamp>1268772360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Had he been a real Jedi, he would have just waved his hand and said "You don't have to remove your hood", to which security would have said "You don't have to remove your hood" and waved him on through.</p></div><p>The Jedi mind trick only works on <b>weak</b> minds, not security guards.  After all, not just anyone can be a security guard.</p><p>Oh, wait..</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Had he been a real Jedi , he would have just waved his hand and said " You do n't have to remove your hood " , to which security would have said " You do n't have to remove your hood " and waved him on through.The Jedi mind trick only works on weak minds , not security guards .
After all , not just anyone can be a security guard.Oh , wait. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Had he been a real Jedi, he would have just waved his hand and said "You don't have to remove your hood", to which security would have said "You don't have to remove your hood" and waved him on through.The Jedi mind trick only works on weak minds, not security guards.
After all, not just anyone can be a security guard.Oh, wait..
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500788</id>
	<title>Re:What BS!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268731140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh great, I started a religious war <i>again</i>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh great , I started a religious war again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh great, I started a religious war again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498366</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498590</id>
	<title>Re:A little extreme?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268765280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I generally hire staff that have an affinity for Star Wars</p></div><p>Do they allow discrimination on religious grounds where you come from?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I generally hire staff that have an affinity for Star WarsDo they allow discrimination on religious grounds where you come from ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I generally hire staff that have an affinity for Star WarsDo they allow discrimination on religious grounds where you come from?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498446</id>
	<title>new religion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268764740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe next time I will walk in on with a stupid hairdo and eyebrows,which is from hooliganism(a new religion)...and sue them for neglecting based on my religion</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe next time I will walk in on with a stupid hairdo and eyebrows,which is from hooliganism ( a new religion ) ...and sue them for neglecting based on my religion</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe next time I will walk in on with a stupid hairdo and eyebrows,which is from hooliganism(a new religion)...and sue them for neglecting based on my religion</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498106</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1268763360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shit, here in the US Churches don't even have to pay *tax*.  And of course, you can't be discriminated against based on your religion.  Nothing says you can't be discriminated against based on a lack of religion though.  Make no law respecting an establishment of religion, my ass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shit , here in the US Churches do n't even have to pay * tax * .
And of course , you ca n't be discriminated against based on your religion .
Nothing says you ca n't be discriminated against based on a lack of religion though .
Make no law respecting an establishment of religion , my ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shit, here in the US Churches don't even have to pay *tax*.
And of course, you can't be discriminated against based on your religion.
Nothing says you can't be discriminated against based on a lack of religion though.
Make no law respecting an establishment of religion, my ass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31505984</id>
	<title>Re:And This Is What's Wrong With The UK Today....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268821260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sheesh, did you look at the linked article on the Sun's site?</p><p>Not the actual body of the article but some of the stuff around it and particularly the single word in red at the top of the article.</p><p>If you did I'm sure that your razor sharp powers of observation would have worked out what it all meant. If not I'll exp[lain it to you.</p><p>He's a rare beast, somebody that actually got some paid work out of a visit to the job centre.</p><p>Also, if he's getting JSA that means he's been unemployed less that six months.</p><p>But yes you're right, how dare the ungrateful unemployed scrounging pleb do something out of the ordinary. I'm sure you'll think the exact same about the rest of the half million people that have joined him in having to visit the job centre over the last twelve months.</p><p>And too bloody right I'm posting as AC chicken. There's no way I want anyone to know that I gave a Daily Wail reader the time of day let alone replied to one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sheesh , did you look at the linked article on the Sun 's site ? Not the actual body of the article but some of the stuff around it and particularly the single word in red at the top of the article.If you did I 'm sure that your razor sharp powers of observation would have worked out what it all meant .
If not I 'll exp [ lain it to you.He 's a rare beast , somebody that actually got some paid work out of a visit to the job centre.Also , if he 's getting JSA that means he 's been unemployed less that six months.But yes you 're right , how dare the ungrateful unemployed scrounging pleb do something out of the ordinary .
I 'm sure you 'll think the exact same about the rest of the half million people that have joined him in having to visit the job centre over the last twelve months.And too bloody right I 'm posting as AC chicken .
There 's no way I want anyone to know that I gave a Daily Wail reader the time of day let alone replied to one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sheesh, did you look at the linked article on the Sun's site?Not the actual body of the article but some of the stuff around it and particularly the single word in red at the top of the article.If you did I'm sure that your razor sharp powers of observation would have worked out what it all meant.
If not I'll exp[lain it to you.He's a rare beast, somebody that actually got some paid work out of a visit to the job centre.Also, if he's getting JSA that means he's been unemployed less that six months.But yes you're right, how dare the ungrateful unemployed scrounging pleb do something out of the ordinary.
I'm sure you'll think the exact same about the rest of the half million people that have joined him in having to visit the job centre over the last twelve months.And too bloody right I'm posting as AC chicken.
There's no way I want anyone to know that I gave a Daily Wail reader the time of day let alone replied to one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498950</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>harl</author>
	<datestamp>1268766540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To heck with churches.  Check out the HMOs in the states.  How the fuck is an insurance company a non-profit?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To heck with churches .
Check out the HMOs in the states .
How the fuck is an insurance company a non-profit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To heck with churches.
Check out the HMOs in the states.
How the fuck is an insurance company a non-profit?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499244</id>
	<title>Re:Might not be PC, but...</title>
	<author>zorro-z</author>
	<datestamp>1268767680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"You don't get rich writing science-fiction. If you want to get rich, you found a religion." * L. Ron Hubbard, Nov. 11, 1948</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" You do n't get rich writing science-fiction .
If you want to get rich , you found a religion .
" * L. Ron Hubbard , Nov. 11 , 1948</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"You don't get rich writing science-fiction.
If you want to get rich, you found a religion.
" * L. Ron Hubbard, Nov. 11, 1948</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498068</id>
	<title>What BS!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268763180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since when do Jedi <b>have</b> to wear hoodies with the hood up?  There are numerous points in the movies where Jedi do not wear their hoods up, and numerous occasions where they even wearing a garment that has a hood at all.  Clearly, mandatory hoodies is not one of the precepts of Jediism as it existed in the Galactic Republic/Empire.</p><p>This reminds me of all the rituals and requirements Catholics make up that was never mentioned in the Bible.  But at least they can point at a section in the Bible that can be read to say that the church leaders are allowed to make this stuff up..  As far as I know, not only is there no such statement in Star Wars, Lucas is quite serious about restricting who is allowed to expand upon Star Wars.  Is there some Expanded Universe novel in which the Hoodie Requirement is created?</p><p>So dude, I mean Mr. Jedi, put your hood down.  You don't need it up to be a Jedi.  Insisting on putting it up isn't holding fast to your religion, it's playing dress-up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since when do Jedi have to wear hoodies with the hood up ?
There are numerous points in the movies where Jedi do not wear their hoods up , and numerous occasions where they even wearing a garment that has a hood at all .
Clearly , mandatory hoodies is not one of the precepts of Jediism as it existed in the Galactic Republic/Empire.This reminds me of all the rituals and requirements Catholics make up that was never mentioned in the Bible .
But at least they can point at a section in the Bible that can be read to say that the church leaders are allowed to make this stuff up.. As far as I know , not only is there no such statement in Star Wars , Lucas is quite serious about restricting who is allowed to expand upon Star Wars .
Is there some Expanded Universe novel in which the Hoodie Requirement is created ? So dude , I mean Mr. Jedi , put your hood down .
You do n't need it up to be a Jedi .
Insisting on putting it up is n't holding fast to your religion , it 's playing dress-up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since when do Jedi have to wear hoodies with the hood up?
There are numerous points in the movies where Jedi do not wear their hoods up, and numerous occasions where they even wearing a garment that has a hood at all.
Clearly, mandatory hoodies is not one of the precepts of Jediism as it existed in the Galactic Republic/Empire.This reminds me of all the rituals and requirements Catholics make up that was never mentioned in the Bible.
But at least they can point at a section in the Bible that can be read to say that the church leaders are allowed to make this stuff up..  As far as I know, not only is there no such statement in Star Wars, Lucas is quite serious about restricting who is allowed to expand upon Star Wars.
Is there some Expanded Universe novel in which the Hoodie Requirement is created?So dude, I mean Mr. Jedi, put your hood down.
You don't need it up to be a Jedi.
Insisting on putting it up isn't holding fast to your religion, it's playing dress-up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31501044</id>
	<title>Re:What BS!</title>
	<author>psithurism</author>
	<datestamp>1268732280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The Jedi church has no <i>official</i> doctrine or scripture." Which gives personal doctrine complete freedom to be whatever the hell he wants.</p><p>Awesome, jedichurch.org is whitelisted in my company's nsfw-blocker.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The Jedi church has no official doctrine or scripture .
" Which gives personal doctrine complete freedom to be whatever the hell he wants.Awesome , jedichurch.org is whitelisted in my company 's nsfw-blocker .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The Jedi church has no official doctrine or scripture.
" Which gives personal doctrine complete freedom to be whatever the hell he wants.Awesome, jedichurch.org is whitelisted in my company's nsfw-blocker.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498158</id>
	<title>Might not be PC, but...</title>
	<author>Trip6</author>
	<datestamp>1268763540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...Jediism carries the same credibility as other religions directly based on science fiction stories.  Just ask Tom Cruise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...Jediism carries the same credibility as other religions directly based on science fiction stories .
Just ask Tom Cruise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Jediism carries the same credibility as other religions directly based on science fiction stories.
Just ask Tom Cruise.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31503000</id>
	<title>Much better Jedi story</title>
	<author>Shimbo</author>
	<datestamp>1268742600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That was a little lame, there was a much better Jedi story last year: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/sep/18/jedi-religion-tesco-hood-jones" title="guardian.co.uk">a Jedi master against the Tesco empire</a> [guardian.co.uk] </p><p><div class="quote"><p>Tesco said: "He hasn't been banned. Jedis are very welcome to shop in our stores although we would ask them to remove their hoods.</p><p>"Obi-Wan Kenobi, Yoda and Luke Skywalker all appeared hoodless without ever going over to the Dark Side and we are only aware of the Emperor as one who never removed his hood.</p><p>"If Jedi walk around our stores with their hoods on, they'll miss lots of special offers."</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That was a little lame , there was a much better Jedi story last year : a Jedi master against the Tesco empire [ guardian.co.uk ] Tesco said : " He has n't been banned .
Jedis are very welcome to shop in our stores although we would ask them to remove their hoods .
" Obi-Wan Kenobi , Yoda and Luke Skywalker all appeared hoodless without ever going over to the Dark Side and we are only aware of the Emperor as one who never removed his hood .
" If Jedi walk around our stores with their hoods on , they 'll miss lots of special offers .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was a little lame, there was a much better Jedi story last year: a Jedi master against the Tesco empire [guardian.co.uk] Tesco said: "He hasn't been banned.
Jedis are very welcome to shop in our stores although we would ask them to remove their hoods.
"Obi-Wan Kenobi, Yoda and Luke Skywalker all appeared hoodless without ever going over to the Dark Side and we are only aware of the Emperor as one who never removed his hood.
"If Jedi walk around our stores with their hoods on, they'll miss lots of special offers.
"
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31506248</id>
	<title>A lot of people are missing the point here....</title>
	<author>Builder</author>
	<datestamp>1268824200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The whole point of this stunt is to show how ridiculous the current allowances for religion are.</p><p>If some bloke wants to go into the jobcentre with a simple hood up, he's not allowed to. If a muslim woman with only a small slit in a veil showing her eyes wants to go into that same place, she IS allowed to.</p><p>A seikh can carry a dagger in London. He can even carry one into a school. If I get caught with my leatherman supertool and can't convince a police officer that I have good excuse for having it, I face jail. People have been convicted for carrying a dangerous weapon for carrying these and Gerbers.</p><p>I can't fill up my motorcycle at most petrol stations without removing my helmet, even though I wear a flip face model (I can get in and out of the country wearing this, but that's another story). A woman in a full veil is allowed to.</p><p>So yes, the whole Jedi thing is silly - but getting the apology proves a point - we have one rule for the pious and another rule for the rest of us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The whole point of this stunt is to show how ridiculous the current allowances for religion are.If some bloke wants to go into the jobcentre with a simple hood up , he 's not allowed to .
If a muslim woman with only a small slit in a veil showing her eyes wants to go into that same place , she IS allowed to.A seikh can carry a dagger in London .
He can even carry one into a school .
If I get caught with my leatherman supertool and ca n't convince a police officer that I have good excuse for having it , I face jail .
People have been convicted for carrying a dangerous weapon for carrying these and Gerbers.I ca n't fill up my motorcycle at most petrol stations without removing my helmet , even though I wear a flip face model ( I can get in and out of the country wearing this , but that 's another story ) .
A woman in a full veil is allowed to.So yes , the whole Jedi thing is silly - but getting the apology proves a point - we have one rule for the pious and another rule for the rest of us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The whole point of this stunt is to show how ridiculous the current allowances for religion are.If some bloke wants to go into the jobcentre with a simple hood up, he's not allowed to.
If a muslim woman with only a small slit in a veil showing her eyes wants to go into that same place, she IS allowed to.A seikh can carry a dagger in London.
He can even carry one into a school.
If I get caught with my leatherman supertool and can't convince a police officer that I have good excuse for having it, I face jail.
People have been convicted for carrying a dangerous weapon for carrying these and Gerbers.I can't fill up my motorcycle at most petrol stations without removing my helmet, even though I wear a flip face model (I can get in and out of the country wearing this, but that's another story).
A woman in a full veil is allowed to.So yes, the whole Jedi thing is silly - but getting the apology proves a point - we have one rule for the pious and another rule for the rest of us.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498134</id>
	<title>A little extreme?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268763420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I generally hire staff that have an affinity for Star Wars - and at least one replica lightsaber.  I also have systems named JEDI (Joint Enterprise Document Ifrastructre) and YODA (Your Online Document Archive) but do not insist on Jedi robes.<br><br>As it is, the guy was wearing a hoodie, not a Jedi robe.<br><br>Seems a bit extreme.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I generally hire staff that have an affinity for Star Wars - and at least one replica lightsaber .
I also have systems named JEDI ( Joint Enterprise Document Ifrastructre ) and YODA ( Your Online Document Archive ) but do not insist on Jedi robes.As it is , the guy was wearing a hoodie , not a Jedi robe.Seems a bit extreme .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I generally hire staff that have an affinity for Star Wars - and at least one replica lightsaber.
I also have systems named JEDI (Joint Enterprise Document Ifrastructre) and YODA (Your Online Document Archive) but do not insist on Jedi robes.As it is, the guy was wearing a hoodie, not a Jedi robe.Seems a bit extreme.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499938</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, the Irony</title>
	<author>kehren77</author>
	<datestamp>1268770440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well then the only sensible course of action is to outlaw religion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well then the only sensible course of action is to outlaw religion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well then the only sensible course of action is to outlaw religion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31501210</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>therealkevinkretz</author>
	<datestamp>1268733000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Non-profits don't have to pay taxes on *profit*.  They still have to pay sales tax (in most places) and FICA/Medicare tax, and all the stupid taxes on the phone bill, etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Non-profits do n't have to pay taxes on * profit * .
They still have to pay sales tax ( in most places ) and FICA/Medicare tax , and all the stupid taxes on the phone bill , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Non-profits don't have to pay taxes on *profit*.
They still have to pay sales tax (in most places) and FICA/Medicare tax, and all the stupid taxes on the phone bill, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498876</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>jimicus</author>
	<datestamp>1268766300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No non-profit organizations in the United States have to pay taxes.</p></div><p>How in the whole of thundering f*ck is a church a non profit organisation?  The profits just go to some central fund to be spent how they want (more churches, repairs on existing churches, hush money to parents of small boys...) rather than back out to shareholders</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No non-profit organizations in the United States have to pay taxes.How in the whole of thundering f * ck is a church a non profit organisation ?
The profits just go to some central fund to be spent how they want ( more churches , repairs on existing churches , hush money to parents of small boys... ) rather than back out to shareholders</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No non-profit organizations in the United States have to pay taxes.How in the whole of thundering f*ck is a church a non profit organisation?
The profits just go to some central fund to be spent how they want (more churches, repairs on existing churches, hush money to parents of small boys...) rather than back out to shareholders
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31506238</id>
	<title>Not so funny</title>
	<author>dugeen</author>
	<datestamp>1268824080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The New Labour religious hate laws that made this amusing story possible also grant the same privileges to Christian and Muslim fanatics. You can be sure the use they make of them will be a lot less chortlesome.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The New Labour religious hate laws that made this amusing story possible also grant the same privileges to Christian and Muslim fanatics .
You can be sure the use they make of them will be a lot less chortlesome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The New Labour religious hate laws that made this amusing story possible also grant the same privileges to Christian and Muslim fanatics.
You can be sure the use they make of them will be a lot less chortlesome.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498440</id>
	<title>Re:What BS!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268764740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, as it existed in the Galactic Republic/Empire, being a Jedi carried with it the prerequisite that you had to be able to use the Force to manipulate objects and people. If we're going to go by the canon-standard, this guy isn't a Jedi anyway. At that point he becomes just another moron who won't take his hood off inside.</p><p>But I believe the Jedi "religion" (which I must believe Lucas finds to be a whole new level of stupid) is quite different from the movie's Jedi Order, and has made up its own rituals and requirements in order to help them forget the fact that they aren't actual Jedi.<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , as it existed in the Galactic Republic/Empire , being a Jedi carried with it the prerequisite that you had to be able to use the Force to manipulate objects and people .
If we 're going to go by the canon-standard , this guy is n't a Jedi anyway .
At that point he becomes just another moron who wo n't take his hood off inside.But I believe the Jedi " religion " ( which I must believe Lucas finds to be a whole new level of stupid ) is quite different from the movie 's Jedi Order , and has made up its own rituals and requirements in order to help them forget the fact that they are n't actual Jedi .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, as it existed in the Galactic Republic/Empire, being a Jedi carried with it the prerequisite that you had to be able to use the Force to manipulate objects and people.
If we're going to go by the canon-standard, this guy isn't a Jedi anyway.
At that point he becomes just another moron who won't take his hood off inside.But I believe the Jedi "religion" (which I must believe Lucas finds to be a whole new level of stupid) is quite different from the movie's Jedi Order, and has made up its own rituals and requirements in order to help them forget the fact that they aren't actual Jedi.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498160</id>
	<title>Re:We Todd Dead</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268763600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not to mention the Emperor already has a job, so he'd be unlikely to be in the job centre in the first place.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention the Emperor already has a job , so he 'd be unlikely to be in the job centre in the first place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention the Emperor already has a job, so he'd be unlikely to be in the job centre in the first place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499424</id>
	<title>Re:Chuch of Highlander</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268768400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I carry a sword all the time, well, make that often enough. In Mass we have laws back from when it was fashionable for the rich to wear their swords, as well as high ranking members of the military, protecting the ability to openly wear a sword. Sure, you get hassled a little by the police, they check your permit for a knife over five inches, and sometimes give you some grief, but I just carry the laws laminated on a card, which I hand to them, and more often than not I am allowed to continue on my way... The worst day was some really new/something to prove cop just arrested me and took me to the station.... I was released in two hours with an apology because no law had been broken. Though it did cost the hour fee for my lawyer to come by and point that out. Got the sword back, a nice apology, and was able to don it in the station, and walk out....</p><p>Really, really useful if you are studying any Western/Eastern martial art that uses a practice sword, or a live sword, because its a.) annoying to carry it around in a case. and b.) illegal to conceal your sword in a case to carry around.... <br>
&nbsp; <br>Just always have it safety bound, and know you may be shot by an idiot, and go right ahead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I carry a sword all the time , well , make that often enough .
In Mass we have laws back from when it was fashionable for the rich to wear their swords , as well as high ranking members of the military , protecting the ability to openly wear a sword .
Sure , you get hassled a little by the police , they check your permit for a knife over five inches , and sometimes give you some grief , but I just carry the laws laminated on a card , which I hand to them , and more often than not I am allowed to continue on my way... The worst day was some really new/something to prove cop just arrested me and took me to the station.... I was released in two hours with an apology because no law had been broken .
Though it did cost the hour fee for my lawyer to come by and point that out .
Got the sword back , a nice apology , and was able to don it in the station , and walk out....Really , really useful if you are studying any Western/Eastern martial art that uses a practice sword , or a live sword , because its a .
) annoying to carry it around in a case .
and b .
) illegal to conceal your sword in a case to carry around... .   Just always have it safety bound , and know you may be shot by an idiot , and go right ahead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I carry a sword all the time, well, make that often enough.
In Mass we have laws back from when it was fashionable for the rich to wear their swords, as well as high ranking members of the military, protecting the ability to openly wear a sword.
Sure, you get hassled a little by the police, they check your permit for a knife over five inches, and sometimes give you some grief, but I just carry the laws laminated on a card, which I hand to them, and more often than not I am allowed to continue on my way... The worst day was some really new/something to prove cop just arrested me and took me to the station.... I was released in two hours with an apology because no law had been broken.
Though it did cost the hour fee for my lawyer to come by and point that out.
Got the sword back, a nice apology, and was able to don it in the station, and walk out....Really, really useful if you are studying any Western/Eastern martial art that uses a practice sword, or a live sword, because its a.
) annoying to carry it around in a case.
and b.
) illegal to conceal your sword in a case to carry around.... 
  Just always have it safety bound, and know you may be shot by an idiot, and go right ahead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498314</id>
	<title>He needs to go back to Jedi school.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268764140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Had he been a real Jedi, he would have just waved his hand and said "You don't have to remove your hood", to which security would have said "You don't have to remove your hood" and waved him on through.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Had he been a real Jedi , he would have just waved his hand and said " You do n't have to remove your hood " , to which security would have said " You do n't have to remove your hood " and waved him on through .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Had he been a real Jedi, he would have just waved his hand and said "You don't have to remove your hood", to which security would have said "You don't have to remove your hood" and waved him on through.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498240</id>
	<title>Re:What BS!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268763960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think if his boss checked the Jedi Church's web site, it would have been clear that this guy was full of BS. Quote, "The Jedi church has no official doctrine or scripture." In other words, the Jedi Church does not require its members to wear hoods. This guy is taking a satirical jab at organized religion a bit too far. Here's a link to the Jedi Church's page about doctrine.</p><p>http://www.jedichurch.org/jedi-doctrine.html</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think if his boss checked the Jedi Church 's web site , it would have been clear that this guy was full of BS .
Quote , " The Jedi church has no official doctrine or scripture .
" In other words , the Jedi Church does not require its members to wear hoods .
This guy is taking a satirical jab at organized religion a bit too far .
Here 's a link to the Jedi Church 's page about doctrine.http : //www.jedichurch.org/jedi-doctrine.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think if his boss checked the Jedi Church's web site, it would have been clear that this guy was full of BS.
Quote, "The Jedi church has no official doctrine or scripture.
" In other words, the Jedi Church does not require its members to wear hoods.
This guy is taking a satirical jab at organized religion a bit too far.
Here's a link to the Jedi Church's page about doctrine.http://www.jedichurch.org/jedi-doctrine.html
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31508494</id>
	<title>Re:What BS!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268840760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't lacking official doctrine or scripture throw a wrench into the whole "we are a religion" claim?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't lacking official doctrine or scripture throw a wrench into the whole " we are a religion " claim ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't lacking official doctrine or scripture throw a wrench into the whole "we are a religion" claim?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31506168</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck exceptions for religion</title>
	<author>makomk</author>
	<datestamp>1268823240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Charities do not pay tax either.</p></div><p>Charaties have to register and file accounts and actually perform charitable activities, they get audited if something fishy is going on, and they can in theory get closed down if they're actually just an organisation for the benefit of one of their members. None of the above applies to churches. It's OK if they perform no charitable work whatsoever and spend most of their money on giving the leader a lifestyle of luxury - and in fact quite a few do.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Charities do not pay tax either.Charaties have to register and file accounts and actually perform charitable activities , they get audited if something fishy is going on , and they can in theory get closed down if they 're actually just an organisation for the benefit of one of their members .
None of the above applies to churches .
It 's OK if they perform no charitable work whatsoever and spend most of their money on giving the leader a lifestyle of luxury - and in fact quite a few do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Charities do not pay tax either.Charaties have to register and file accounts and actually perform charitable activities, they get audited if something fishy is going on, and they can in theory get closed down if they're actually just an organisation for the benefit of one of their members.
None of the above applies to churches.
It's OK if they perform no charitable work whatsoever and spend most of their money on giving the leader a lifestyle of luxury - and in fact quite a few do.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498674</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498044</id>
	<title>Re:This belongs in IDLE.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268763120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because sampenzus knows that 99.9\% of people block idle so he posts his stories in the other sections to get page views.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because sampenzus knows that 99.9 \ % of people block idle so he posts his stories in the other sections to get page views .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because sampenzus knows that 99.9\% of people block idle so he posts his stories in the other sections to get page views.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498058</id>
	<title>Re:He could have fixed it with a wave of the hand</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268763180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm by no means even close to being so dedicated a fan, but I'm pretty sure a Jedi would remove his hood when asked to after entering a building, specifically one run by the local government. All the Jedi characters I remember were pretty polite. Also, I don't recall many complaint forms being filled out.</p><p>Still, kudos to Ms. Flewers for coming through, even if it's only on a customer service front. If being accommodating is possible, why not formally apologise if someone was upset enough to complain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm by no means even close to being so dedicated a fan , but I 'm pretty sure a Jedi would remove his hood when asked to after entering a building , specifically one run by the local government .
All the Jedi characters I remember were pretty polite .
Also , I do n't recall many complaint forms being filled out.Still , kudos to Ms. Flewers for coming through , even if it 's only on a customer service front .
If being accommodating is possible , why not formally apologise if someone was upset enough to complain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm by no means even close to being so dedicated a fan, but I'm pretty sure a Jedi would remove his hood when asked to after entering a building, specifically one run by the local government.
All the Jedi characters I remember were pretty polite.
Also, I don't recall many complaint forms being filled out.Still, kudos to Ms. Flewers for coming through, even if it's only on a customer service front.
If being accommodating is possible, why not formally apologise if someone was upset enough to complain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498816</id>
	<title>If it's anything like the precedent...</title>
	<author>Explodicle</author>
	<datestamp>1268766120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.colsoncaster.com/" title="colsoncaster.com">Probably.</a> [colsoncaster.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably .
[ colsoncaster.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably.
[colsoncaster.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31502674</id>
	<title>Re:We Todd Dead</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268740680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm currently taking constitutional law in church and state, so I thought I would add a few points to the discussion.  The problem with finding against his belief with respect to Jedis taking their hoods off in movies is that it circumscribes the ambit of one's purported religious beliefs to someone else's interpretation--either a pastor, or a judge who now has the task of delving into "what counts" as part of the religion.</p><p>Needless to say, personal beliefs vary widely among individuals even within people in a particular sect or church.  Some might believe one part of a religion, but find other parts distasteful or offensive to their belief system.  Some simply may not have fully thought their beliefs through.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm currently taking constitutional law in church and state , so I thought I would add a few points to the discussion .
The problem with finding against his belief with respect to Jedis taking their hoods off in movies is that it circumscribes the ambit of one 's purported religious beliefs to someone else 's interpretation--either a pastor , or a judge who now has the task of delving into " what counts " as part of the religion.Needless to say , personal beliefs vary widely among individuals even within people in a particular sect or church .
Some might believe one part of a religion , but find other parts distasteful or offensive to their belief system .
Some simply may not have fully thought their beliefs through .
   </tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm currently taking constitutional law in church and state, so I thought I would add a few points to the discussion.
The problem with finding against his belief with respect to Jedis taking their hoods off in movies is that it circumscribes the ambit of one's purported religious beliefs to someone else's interpretation--either a pastor, or a judge who now has the task of delving into "what counts" as part of the religion.Needless to say, personal beliefs vary widely among individuals even within people in a particular sect or church.
Some might believe one part of a religion, but find other parts distasteful or offensive to their belief system.
Some simply may not have fully thought their beliefs through.
   </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497940</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31505766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498346
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31505202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500290
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31501044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31501806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31503556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498072
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498600
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31504002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31502674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31501232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31504600
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31502042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31505516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31508494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31501210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500480
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31503370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31503318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31504646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31506168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498200
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498692
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31507286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31504066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31506660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500618
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31501946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31502784
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31502854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31506128
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500220
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31509062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31514258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31505984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31506196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1613219_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500752
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1613219.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500400
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1613219.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31505202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498590
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1613219.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499244
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31504646
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1613219.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31501946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31503556
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1613219.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498048
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498396
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31505516
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499224
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31503370
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498816
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1613219.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500480
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31505984
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31506196
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1613219.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31501232
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1613219.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500220
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1613219.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31504066
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1613219.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499118
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1613219.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498072
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498106
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498272
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498708
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499132
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499716
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499282
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499284
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498600
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31501210
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498692
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500290
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498876
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500622
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498950
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500146
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498674
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499210
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500618
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31502854
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31502784
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499250
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31506168
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1613219.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497948
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1613219.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499264
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31502674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498200
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500752
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498160
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31502042
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499466
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31507286
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1613219.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497896
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497992
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498058
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498724
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498346
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498990
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500396
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31503318
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500662
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499408
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31505766
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31509062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31497964
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498044
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1613219.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498518
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499078
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1613219.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498606
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1613219.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31499202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498240
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31501044
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31504600
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31508494
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31506128
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31504002
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31506660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498440
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31501806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31498366
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31500788
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1613219.31514258
</commentlist>
</conversation>
