<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_16_1317228</id>
	<title>MySpace To Sell User Data</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1268748960000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>OnlyJedi writes <i>"Hot on the news of Netflix canceling its latest contest over privacy concerns, news has spread that MySpace is going in the opposite direction. Apparently, the one-time leading social network is now <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace\_bulk\_data.php">selling user data to third party collection firms</a>. From the article, the data that <a href="http://infochimps.org/">InfoChimps</a> has listed includes '<a href="http://infochimps.org/collections/myspace-real-time-stream">user playlists, mood updates, mobile updates, photos, vents, reviews, blog posts, names and zipcodes</a>.' InfoChimps is a reseller that deals with individuals and groups, from academic researchers to marketers and industry analysts. So if you're worried about your data on MySpace being sold off to anybody with a few hundred dollars, now's the time to delete that little-used account."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>OnlyJedi writes " Hot on the news of Netflix canceling its latest contest over privacy concerns , news has spread that MySpace is going in the opposite direction .
Apparently , the one-time leading social network is now selling user data to third party collection firms .
From the article , the data that InfoChimps has listed includes 'user playlists , mood updates , mobile updates , photos , vents , reviews , blog posts , names and zipcodes .
' InfoChimps is a reseller that deals with individuals and groups , from academic researchers to marketers and industry analysts .
So if you 're worried about your data on MySpace being sold off to anybody with a few hundred dollars , now 's the time to delete that little-used account .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OnlyJedi writes "Hot on the news of Netflix canceling its latest contest over privacy concerns, news has spread that MySpace is going in the opposite direction.
Apparently, the one-time leading social network is now selling user data to third party collection firms.
From the article, the data that InfoChimps has listed includes 'user playlists, mood updates, mobile updates, photos, vents, reviews, blog posts, names and zipcodes.
' InfoChimps is a reseller that deals with individuals and groups, from academic researchers to marketers and industry analysts.
So if you're worried about your data on MySpace being sold off to anybody with a few hundred dollars, now's the time to delete that little-used account.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495862</id>
	<title>It is the death sigh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268755260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Circuit City did the same thing when it went bankrupt. It sold all of its user data to other companies. This is just another sign that MySpace is dying.<br>(I went to Microcenter (AMAZING STORE! Better than Newegg!) and bought something. They already had my information and informed me that they bought it from Circuit City. I don't really mind, but it was still strange.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Circuit City did the same thing when it went bankrupt .
It sold all of its user data to other companies .
This is just another sign that MySpace is dying .
( I went to Microcenter ( AMAZING STORE !
Better than Newegg !
) and bought something .
They already had my information and informed me that they bought it from Circuit City .
I do n't really mind , but it was still strange .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Circuit City did the same thing when it went bankrupt.
It sold all of its user data to other companies.
This is just another sign that MySpace is dying.
(I went to Microcenter (AMAZING STORE!
Better than Newegg!
) and bought something.
They already had my information and informed me that they bought it from Circuit City.
I don't really mind, but it was still strange.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495688</id>
	<title>Google has far more interesting information</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268754660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually Google has far more information about individuals.  The common perception that Google is a "search" company is mistaken.  In truth they are a "targeted advertising" company.  Search, GMail, Android, etc are ways to collect information on you and ways to deliver targeted ads.  Google also delivers targeted ads to participating 3rd party web sites.  Currently they do not sell profile information but if you want to list companies that are hypothetically in a position to do so in the future they certainly should be on the list.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually Google has far more information about individuals .
The common perception that Google is a " search " company is mistaken .
In truth they are a " targeted advertising " company .
Search , GMail , Android , etc are ways to collect information on you and ways to deliver targeted ads .
Google also delivers targeted ads to participating 3rd party web sites .
Currently they do not sell profile information but if you want to list companies that are hypothetically in a position to do so in the future they certainly should be on the list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually Google has far more information about individuals.
The common perception that Google is a "search" company is mistaken.
In truth they are a "targeted advertising" company.
Search, GMail, Android, etc are ways to collect information on you and ways to deliver targeted ads.
Google also delivers targeted ads to participating 3rd party web sites.
Currently they do not sell profile information but if you want to list companies that are hypothetically in a position to do so in the future they certainly should be on the list.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170</id>
	<title>So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268752800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just hit the 'delete' button and your data is safe? Too late, they got you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just hit the 'delete ' button and your data is safe ?
Too late , they got you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just hit the 'delete' button and your data is safe?
Too late, they got you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495324</id>
	<title>WTF!!</title>
	<author>kai\_hiwatari</author>
	<datestamp>1268753340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>*goes to delete whatever is left in my myspace account*</htmltext>
<tokenext>* goes to delete whatever is left in my myspace account *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*goes to delete whatever is left in my myspace account*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31505284</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>lmnfrs</author>
	<datestamp>1268766600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought it would be fun to use fake and obscure things in my lists of stuff I like. In theory it'll throw off the ads too. I want to meet The MCP, watch Goin' Crackers, read The Memex, and my heroes include Mazer Rackham, and The Treacherous Eight.</p><p>Checking my account for these examples by logging in for the first time in a while, the first thing that pops up is encouragement to provide my full name so others know who I am<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:O<br>I guess using tech words as fake names is easily discovered. I do have a couple photos of myself, but a screenshot is my main profile picture which is the only one that can be viewed by non-friends.</p><p>Hopefully they don't sell one of those pictures to make fun of skinny nerds' eating habits..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought it would be fun to use fake and obscure things in my lists of stuff I like .
In theory it 'll throw off the ads too .
I want to meet The MCP , watch Goin ' Crackers , read The Memex , and my heroes include Mazer Rackham , and The Treacherous Eight.Checking my account for these examples by logging in for the first time in a while , the first thing that pops up is encouragement to provide my full name so others know who I am : OI guess using tech words as fake names is easily discovered .
I do have a couple photos of myself , but a screenshot is my main profile picture which is the only one that can be viewed by non-friends.Hopefully they do n't sell one of those pictures to make fun of skinny nerds ' eating habits. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought it would be fun to use fake and obscure things in my lists of stuff I like.
In theory it'll throw off the ads too.
I want to meet The MCP, watch Goin' Crackers, read The Memex, and my heroes include Mazer Rackham, and The Treacherous Eight.Checking my account for these examples by logging in for the first time in a while, the first thing that pops up is encouragement to provide my full name so others know who I am :OI guess using tech words as fake names is easily discovered.
I do have a couple photos of myself, but a screenshot is my main profile picture which is the only one that can be viewed by non-friends.Hopefully they don't sell one of those pictures to make fun of skinny nerds' eating habits..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31499766</id>
	<title>Of course it does some good</title>
	<author>Burz</author>
	<datestamp>1268769720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Deleting your account deprives them of further advertising revenue and sends a signal to the market that selling our data can worsen a company's lagging business into a death spiral.</p><p>The more account closings there are after this selloff, the more Myspace will smell like a dirty dog.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Deleting your account deprives them of further advertising revenue and sends a signal to the market that selling our data can worsen a company 's lagging business into a death spiral.The more account closings there are after this selloff , the more Myspace will smell like a dirty dog .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Deleting your account deprives them of further advertising revenue and sends a signal to the market that selling our data can worsen a company's lagging business into a death spiral.The more account closings there are after this selloff, the more Myspace will smell like a dirty dog.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495864</id>
	<title>ARE YOU SURE?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268755320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Now comes the part you have no control over. You need to let the account sit for months if not years. Over time they (Myspace or Facebook) will need to purge older backups and can only keep current relevant information. So now the older backups are over-written and being written into the system is your current BS profile, but this can take months to years to do and that depends on how much Myspace/Facebook or any social site is willing to retain.</p></div><p>Are you sure that's how it works?</p><p>I don't think you comprehend how goddamn cheap storage is these days, and how minimal the amount of data per user actually is.</p><p>Even if we assume they have 1 billion users, with each having roughly 100 MB of info/wall posts/photos/etc. (in reality, most users probably have a small fraction of that, less than 1 MB), that still comes to only 1x10^17 bytes of data. That's not even an exabyte of data. It's only about 91,000 TB, and that's without using any sort of compression.</p><p>Modern tape drives from IBM can store up to 1 TB of data uncompressed. Using a good algorithm, one can typically achieve 80\% (and usually better) compression ratios for textual data. Even assuming we can only achieve a conservative 75\% compression ratio, that still drops the storage requirements by a quarter or so.</p><p>They could probably store that data for less than $10 million, even if they weren't getting bulk discounts on their hardware and storage media. That's not a lot of money in the whole scheme of things. They could quite easily and comparatively cheaply store everything they know about every user, including a full history.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now comes the part you have no control over .
You need to let the account sit for months if not years .
Over time they ( Myspace or Facebook ) will need to purge older backups and can only keep current relevant information .
So now the older backups are over-written and being written into the system is your current BS profile , but this can take months to years to do and that depends on how much Myspace/Facebook or any social site is willing to retain.Are you sure that 's how it works ? I do n't think you comprehend how goddamn cheap storage is these days , and how minimal the amount of data per user actually is.Even if we assume they have 1 billion users , with each having roughly 100 MB of info/wall posts/photos/etc .
( in reality , most users probably have a small fraction of that , less than 1 MB ) , that still comes to only 1x10 ^ 17 bytes of data .
That 's not even an exabyte of data .
It 's only about 91,000 TB , and that 's without using any sort of compression.Modern tape drives from IBM can store up to 1 TB of data uncompressed .
Using a good algorithm , one can typically achieve 80 \ % ( and usually better ) compression ratios for textual data .
Even assuming we can only achieve a conservative 75 \ % compression ratio , that still drops the storage requirements by a quarter or so.They could probably store that data for less than $ 10 million , even if they were n't getting bulk discounts on their hardware and storage media .
That 's not a lot of money in the whole scheme of things .
They could quite easily and comparatively cheaply store everything they know about every user , including a full history .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now comes the part you have no control over.
You need to let the account sit for months if not years.
Over time they (Myspace or Facebook) will need to purge older backups and can only keep current relevant information.
So now the older backups are over-written and being written into the system is your current BS profile, but this can take months to years to do and that depends on how much Myspace/Facebook or any social site is willing to retain.Are you sure that's how it works?I don't think you comprehend how goddamn cheap storage is these days, and how minimal the amount of data per user actually is.Even if we assume they have 1 billion users, with each having roughly 100 MB of info/wall posts/photos/etc.
(in reality, most users probably have a small fraction of that, less than 1 MB), that still comes to only 1x10^17 bytes of data.
That's not even an exabyte of data.
It's only about 91,000 TB, and that's without using any sort of compression.Modern tape drives from IBM can store up to 1 TB of data uncompressed.
Using a good algorithm, one can typically achieve 80\% (and usually better) compression ratios for textual data.
Even assuming we can only achieve a conservative 75\% compression ratio, that still drops the storage requirements by a quarter or so.They could probably store that data for less than $10 million, even if they weren't getting bulk discounts on their hardware and storage media.
That's not a lot of money in the whole scheme of things.
They could quite easily and comparatively cheaply store everything they know about every user, including a full history.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31505018</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>ImYourVirus</author>
	<datestamp>1268762280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some idiot somewhere buys the shit they send them, that's where they make money.<br> <br>

Nigerian scammers and the like wouldn't do it if they weren't making money, some goof ball somewhere, somehow, sometime is buying their shit, which enables them to continue their shit selling schemes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some idiot somewhere buys the shit they send them , that 's where they make money .
Nigerian scammers and the like would n't do it if they were n't making money , some goof ball somewhere , somehow , sometime is buying their shit , which enables them to continue their shit selling schemes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some idiot somewhere buys the shit they send them, that's where they make money.
Nigerian scammers and the like wouldn't do it if they weren't making money, some goof ball somewhere, somehow, sometime is buying their shit, which enables them to continue their shit selling schemes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495818</id>
	<title>Re:Deleting does no good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268755140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought I saw somewhere there was a site you could use to trash your data and close the account, or something to that effect. I can't remember where it was posted. I thought here. Anyone know what I'm talking about?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought I saw somewhere there was a site you could use to trash your data and close the account , or something to that effect .
I ca n't remember where it was posted .
I thought here .
Anyone know what I 'm talking about ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought I saw somewhere there was a site you could use to trash your data and close the account, or something to that effect.
I can't remember where it was posted.
I thought here.
Anyone know what I'm talking about?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496170</id>
	<title>Releasing info on minors is probably prohibited</title>
	<author>perpenso</author>
	<datestamp>1268756400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Releasing personally identifiable information (names or contact info for example) on minors is probably legally prohibited.  They can probably only release aggregate non-identifiable information.  Also minors can not legally enter into a contract (in the US) so terms of use agreements that allow the release of personally identifiable information may not be valid.  Perhaps an EFF lawyer can send a letter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Releasing personally identifiable information ( names or contact info for example ) on minors is probably legally prohibited .
They can probably only release aggregate non-identifiable information .
Also minors can not legally enter into a contract ( in the US ) so terms of use agreements that allow the release of personally identifiable information may not be valid .
Perhaps an EFF lawyer can send a letter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Releasing personally identifiable information (names or contact info for example) on minors is probably legally prohibited.
They can probably only release aggregate non-identifiable information.
Also minors can not legally enter into a contract (in the US) so terms of use agreements that allow the release of personally identifiable information may not be valid.
Perhaps an EFF lawyer can send a letter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31499816</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>Klintus Fang</author>
	<datestamp>1268769900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am thinking the same.  Now that they've made the decision that their new business model is to sell user data, they are going to buffer and protect what they have if they weren't doing so previously.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am thinking the same .
Now that they 've made the decision that their new business model is to sell user data , they are going to buffer and protect what they have if they were n't doing so previously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am thinking the same.
Now that they've made the decision that their new business model is to sell user data, they are going to buffer and protect what they have if they weren't doing so previously.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497228</id>
	<title>Photos?</title>
	<author>Syberz</author>
	<datestamp>1268760060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, they can sell YOUR photo of YOUR dog to a dog food company to use for their advertising? All this without your explicit consent or you getting a cut of the action?</p><p>Wow... who needs iStock Photo when you can buy mySpace pics in bulk? Granted the quality/resolution isn't as good but for most online advertising it's enough, a little photoshop and bingo!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , they can sell YOUR photo of YOUR dog to a dog food company to use for their advertising ?
All this without your explicit consent or you getting a cut of the action ? Wow... who needs iStock Photo when you can buy mySpace pics in bulk ?
Granted the quality/resolution is n't as good but for most online advertising it 's enough , a little photoshop and bingo !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, they can sell YOUR photo of YOUR dog to a dog food company to use for their advertising?
All this without your explicit consent or you getting a cut of the action?Wow... who needs iStock Photo when you can buy mySpace pics in bulk?
Granted the quality/resolution isn't as good but for most online advertising it's enough, a little photoshop and bingo!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496524</id>
	<title>Update it misleadingly rather than delete it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268757780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you delete a profile, a buyer can specifically ask for all recent profiles plus deleted profiles.<br>But if your profile is still active, a buyer will / should always ask for the most recent data.<br>Hence, just change it to gibberish instead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you delete a profile , a buyer can specifically ask for all recent profiles plus deleted profiles.But if your profile is still active , a buyer will / should always ask for the most recent data.Hence , just change it to gibberish instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you delete a profile, a buyer can specifically ask for all recent profiles plus deleted profiles.But if your profile is still active, a buyer will / should always ask for the most recent data.Hence, just change it to gibberish instead.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495332</id>
	<title>MySpace? Who cares? You should be concerned about.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268753340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Facebook. Obviously all that matters in any of these enterprises is that the owners make money. Facebook is hard charging and building pretty solid for the inevitable day, in the very near future is going to come when..<br>
1. Facebook is bought by someone with DEEP pockets<br>
2. The said purchasers looks to make money from all that data that has been amassed.
<br>
MySpace is Sunday School by comparison.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Facebook .
Obviously all that matters in any of these enterprises is that the owners make money .
Facebook is hard charging and building pretty solid for the inevitable day , in the very near future is going to come when. . 1. Facebook is bought by someone with DEEP pockets 2 .
The said purchasers looks to make money from all that data that has been amassed .
MySpace is Sunday School by comparison .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Facebook.
Obviously all that matters in any of these enterprises is that the owners make money.
Facebook is hard charging and building pretty solid for the inevitable day, in the very near future is going to come when..
1. Facebook is bought by someone with DEEP pockets
2.
The said purchasers looks to make money from all that data that has been amassed.
MySpace is Sunday School by comparison.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31500372</id>
	<title>Re:What is myspace?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268772240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They're going to know the music you wear</p></div><p>How embarrassing! I don't need anyone knowing that I wear an XXL music<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're going to know the music you wearHow embarrassing !
I do n't need anyone knowing that I wear an XXL music : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're going to know the music you wearHow embarrassing!
I don't need anyone knowing that I wear an XXL music :(
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31508112</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268839380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More likely, they set up the TOS so that anything you input to MySPACE become *their* data.</p><p>And probably, by deleting your account you are ending the agreement with them, so that they now have *no* obligation to you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More likely , they set up the TOS so that anything you input to MySPACE become * their * data.And probably , by deleting your account you are ending the agreement with them , so that they now have * no * obligation to you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More likely, they set up the TOS so that anything you input to MySPACE become *their* data.And probably, by deleting your account you are ending the agreement with them, so that they now have *no* obligation to you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495924</id>
	<title>Re:I Still Use It...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268755440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;It's funny to me that the often pro-choice Slashdot crowd sees these features as a bad thing.</p><p>I'm all for restricting of interfaces. When usability and readability are important, non-designers shouldnt have access to things that allow garish colors, screaming music at load up, blinking, crazy fonts, animated gifs, etc. Myspace is just a geocities rehash.  Notice I cant do these things in the comments section of slashdot, and we are all better off this way.</p><p>I also refuse to participate in forums that allow giant signature gifs, blinking tags, colored text, etc.  I stick to slashdot, reddit, sdmb, and metafilter for the most part.  The level of discourse is also higher there. Once morons realize that they cant upload their animated gifs of someone getting punched in the face or taking a shit they slither off back to godknowswhere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; It 's funny to me that the often pro-choice Slashdot crowd sees these features as a bad thing.I 'm all for restricting of interfaces .
When usability and readability are important , non-designers shouldnt have access to things that allow garish colors , screaming music at load up , blinking , crazy fonts , animated gifs , etc .
Myspace is just a geocities rehash .
Notice I cant do these things in the comments section of slashdot , and we are all better off this way.I also refuse to participate in forums that allow giant signature gifs , blinking tags , colored text , etc .
I stick to slashdot , reddit , sdmb , and metafilter for the most part .
The level of discourse is also higher there .
Once morons realize that they cant upload their animated gifs of someone getting punched in the face or taking a shit they slither off back to godknowswhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;It's funny to me that the often pro-choice Slashdot crowd sees these features as a bad thing.I'm all for restricting of interfaces.
When usability and readability are important, non-designers shouldnt have access to things that allow garish colors, screaming music at load up, blinking, crazy fonts, animated gifs, etc.
Myspace is just a geocities rehash.
Notice I cant do these things in the comments section of slashdot, and we are all better off this way.I also refuse to participate in forums that allow giant signature gifs, blinking tags, colored text, etc.
I stick to slashdot, reddit, sdmb, and metafilter for the most part.
The level of discourse is also higher there.
Once morons realize that they cant upload their animated gifs of someone getting punched in the face or taking a shit they slither off back to godknowswhere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495472</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496030</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>cellurl</author>
	<datestamp>1268755860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I drive a bunch of kids to school. <br>
They all have two accounts, one real and one fake.<br>
-learn from them...<br> <br> <br>

<a href="http://www.wikispeedia.org/" title="wikispeedia.org" rel="nofollow">Speed baby</a> [wikispeedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I drive a bunch of kids to school .
They all have two accounts , one real and one fake .
-learn from them.. . Speed baby [ wikispeedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I drive a bunch of kids to school.
They all have two accounts, one real and one fake.
-learn from them...  

Speed baby [wikispeedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496068</id>
	<title>Delete the account?!? Huh?</title>
	<author>PolarIced</author>
	<datestamp>1268756040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What makes you think that deleting the account will keep them from selling your info anyway? You probably waived any and all rights to privacy and such when you signed up in the first place. I just don't get what people are thinking these days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What makes you think that deleting the account will keep them from selling your info anyway ?
You probably waived any and all rights to privacy and such when you signed up in the first place .
I just do n't get what people are thinking these days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What makes you think that deleting the account will keep them from selling your info anyway?
You probably waived any and all rights to privacy and such when you signed up in the first place.
I just don't get what people are thinking these days.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496994</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>fulldecent</author>
	<datestamp>1268759280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Almost. Backups and versions don't get deleted any more, they just get added to sentences like:</p><p>Casandra is in use at Rackspace, Digg, Facebook, Twitter, Cisco, Mahalo, Ooyala, and more companies that have large, active data sets. The largest production cluster has over 100 TB of data in over 150 machines.</p><p>Historical data will most likely be useful to someone someday. Also, I have a collection of a large percentage of all AIM profiles from the early 2000s. Will that be useful some day? Probably not... probably.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Almost .
Backups and versions do n't get deleted any more , they just get added to sentences like : Casandra is in use at Rackspace , Digg , Facebook , Twitter , Cisco , Mahalo , Ooyala , and more companies that have large , active data sets .
The largest production cluster has over 100 TB of data in over 150 machines.Historical data will most likely be useful to someone someday .
Also , I have a collection of a large percentage of all AIM profiles from the early 2000s .
Will that be useful some day ?
Probably not... probably .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Almost.
Backups and versions don't get deleted any more, they just get added to sentences like:Casandra is in use at Rackspace, Digg, Facebook, Twitter, Cisco, Mahalo, Ooyala, and more companies that have large, active data sets.
The largest production cluster has over 100 TB of data in over 150 machines.Historical data will most likely be useful to someone someday.
Also, I have a collection of a large percentage of all AIM profiles from the early 2000s.
Will that be useful some day?
Probably not... probably.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496712</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>Yvanhoe</author>
	<datestamp>1268758380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Am I the only one to wonder how companies monetize that ? Let's suppose I'm an average teenager with no concept of privacy. Myspace has my email address, my physical address, the place where I study, the music I like, the girls I pretended to bang, my political opinions, my favorite beer, etc... Then what ? They send me spam ? Who doesn't have a filter nowadays ? They send me physical spam ? How do they monetize that ? <br> <br>
I'm smelling fishy business plans here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one to wonder how companies monetize that ?
Let 's suppose I 'm an average teenager with no concept of privacy .
Myspace has my email address , my physical address , the place where I study , the music I like , the girls I pretended to bang , my political opinions , my favorite beer , etc... Then what ?
They send me spam ?
Who does n't have a filter nowadays ?
They send me physical spam ?
How do they monetize that ?
I 'm smelling fishy business plans here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one to wonder how companies monetize that ?
Let's suppose I'm an average teenager with no concept of privacy.
Myspace has my email address, my physical address, the place where I study, the music I like, the girls I pretended to bang, my political opinions, my favorite beer, etc... Then what ?
They send me spam ?
Who doesn't have a filter nowadays ?
They send me physical spam ?
How do they monetize that ?
I'm smelling fishy business plans here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495850</id>
	<title>Re:WTF!!</title>
	<author>msuarezalvarez</author>
	<datestamp>1268755260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You *have* a myspace account?!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You * have * a myspace account ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You *have* a myspace account?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31498078</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>bmo</author>
	<datestamp>1268763240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"No. Removing your profile is really easy. Just edit it into a troll profile. Replace all images with the pain series, 50 hitlers / swastikas, etc. Edit all texts to the most offensive ones possible. "</p><p>This does not work with Ebay.</p><p>--<br>BMO</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" No .
Removing your profile is really easy .
Just edit it into a troll profile .
Replace all images with the pain series , 50 hitlers / swastikas , etc .
Edit all texts to the most offensive ones possible .
" This does not work with Ebay.--BMO</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"No.
Removing your profile is really easy.
Just edit it into a troll profile.
Replace all images with the pain series, 50 hitlers / swastikas, etc.
Edit all texts to the most offensive ones possible.
"This does not work with Ebay.--BMO</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31500984</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>ThEATrE</author>
	<datestamp>1268731980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>  If enough people do this, Facebook will get the message that users are unhappy with this decision, even if deleting the account doesn't protect already-entered data.</p></div><p>By the time Facebook decides to sell off their data, the site might be way past its peak, the way Myspace is now.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If enough people do this , Facebook will get the message that users are unhappy with this decision , even if deleting the account does n't protect already-entered data.By the time Facebook decides to sell off their data , the site might be way past its peak , the way Myspace is now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  If enough people do this, Facebook will get the message that users are unhappy with this decision, even if deleting the account doesn't protect already-entered data.By the time Facebook decides to sell off their data, the site might be way past its peak, the way Myspace is now.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495922</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496020</id>
	<title>Not new</title>
	<author>danwesnor</author>
	<datestamp>1268755800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They're just packaging up the info already available to the API - in other words, nefarious villians already have your data.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're just packaging up the info already available to the API - in other words , nefarious villians already have your data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're just packaging up the info already available to the API - in other words, nefarious villians already have your data.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497070</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>vnaughtdeltat</author>
	<datestamp>1268759520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've said before that it's easier closing a bank account than a Myspace account.</p><p>Closing my bank account involved walking in with my account book and walking out with cash. It took about five minutes.</p><p>Closing my Myspace account required three separate Are You Sure You Want To Do This pages before it let me go. Then three months later a friend told me she had added me on Myspace but I never responded. It turns out the account never closed. It just stopped sending me email notifications.</p><p>I'm still not sure if it's gone...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've said before that it 's easier closing a bank account than a Myspace account.Closing my bank account involved walking in with my account book and walking out with cash .
It took about five minutes.Closing my Myspace account required three separate Are You Sure You Want To Do This pages before it let me go .
Then three months later a friend told me she had added me on Myspace but I never responded .
It turns out the account never closed .
It just stopped sending me email notifications.I 'm still not sure if it 's gone.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've said before that it's easier closing a bank account than a Myspace account.Closing my bank account involved walking in with my account book and walking out with cash.
It took about five minutes.Closing my Myspace account required three separate Are You Sure You Want To Do This pages before it let me go.
Then three months later a friend told me she had added me on Myspace but I never responded.
It turns out the account never closed.
It just stopped sending me email notifications.I'm still not sure if it's gone...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496124</id>
	<title>It's about the Message!</title>
	<author>WarwickRyan</author>
	<datestamp>1268756280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Okay, so they've sold your info.  So deleting has no practical benefit as far as your existing data is concerned.</p><p>What is DOES do is send a message to the less terrible networks (Facebook, Twitter, LastFM, Google) that we, the users, take privacy seriously.</p><p>If we can make enough noise, get enough accounts deleted, then these companies will be less likely to flog our info to the highest bidder.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay , so they 've sold your info .
So deleting has no practical benefit as far as your existing data is concerned.What is DOES do is send a message to the less terrible networks ( Facebook , Twitter , LastFM , Google ) that we , the users , take privacy seriously.If we can make enough noise , get enough accounts deleted , then these companies will be less likely to flog our info to the highest bidder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay, so they've sold your info.
So deleting has no practical benefit as far as your existing data is concerned.What is DOES do is send a message to the less terrible networks (Facebook, Twitter, LastFM, Google) that we, the users, take privacy seriously.If we can make enough noise, get enough accounts deleted, then these companies will be less likely to flog our info to the highest bidder.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496552</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>Low Ranked Craig</author>
	<datestamp>1268757900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>ALL of my personal info on Facebook is incorrect.  What kind of fool would publish their birth date, full name and address?</htmltext>
<tokenext>ALL of my personal info on Facebook is incorrect .
What kind of fool would publish their birth date , full name and address ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ALL of my personal info on Facebook is incorrect.
What kind of fool would publish their birth date, full name and address?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497736</id>
	<title>Re:What is myspace?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268761920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Troll? Are you kidding me? I'm not mysurp, but I gotta say something. This marking people as trolls bullshit has gotten out of hand lately. I am SO FUCKING SICK of seeing posts marked as trolls when they are obviously not. It's been rampant lately! What, are there a bunch of new mods or mods with grudges?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Troll ?
Are you kidding me ?
I 'm not mysurp , but I got ta say something .
This marking people as trolls bullshit has gotten out of hand lately .
I am SO FUCKING SICK of seeing posts marked as trolls when they are obviously not .
It 's been rampant lately !
What , are there a bunch of new mods or mods with grudges ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Troll?
Are you kidding me?
I'm not mysurp, but I gotta say something.
This marking people as trolls bullshit has gotten out of hand lately.
I am SO FUCKING SICK of seeing posts marked as trolls when they are obviously not.
It's been rampant lately!
What, are there a bunch of new mods or mods with grudges?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495306</id>
	<title>What's in the data?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268753280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, I see that it includes playlists and crap like that.</p><p>So what's the level of detail?  Can I see an individual user, or just summaries at some predetermined granularity?  If I can see individual users, can I see their name?  If I buy a location-based dataset, can I see the exact GPS coordinates of a data point, or just ZIP code clusters, or what?</p><p>TFS is definitely worded to spread fear.  As much as I dislike companies taking liberties with data they've collected - especially with no accountable opt-out for people who've already handed their data over with no expectation of this sort of behavior - I'd still like to know more about what's actually gonig on before jumping on the FUD bandwagon.</p><p>Oh, and seriously... if they are up to no good, do you really think deleting your account is going to make a difference?  We're talking about the Internet; once you put something in, you can't take it back out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , I see that it includes playlists and crap like that.So what 's the level of detail ?
Can I see an individual user , or just summaries at some predetermined granularity ?
If I can see individual users , can I see their name ?
If I buy a location-based dataset , can I see the exact GPS coordinates of a data point , or just ZIP code clusters , or what ? TFS is definitely worded to spread fear .
As much as I dislike companies taking liberties with data they 've collected - especially with no accountable opt-out for people who 've already handed their data over with no expectation of this sort of behavior - I 'd still like to know more about what 's actually gonig on before jumping on the FUD bandwagon.Oh , and seriously... if they are up to no good , do you really think deleting your account is going to make a difference ?
We 're talking about the Internet ; once you put something in , you ca n't take it back out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, I see that it includes playlists and crap like that.So what's the level of detail?
Can I see an individual user, or just summaries at some predetermined granularity?
If I can see individual users, can I see their name?
If I buy a location-based dataset, can I see the exact GPS coordinates of a data point, or just ZIP code clusters, or what?TFS is definitely worded to spread fear.
As much as I dislike companies taking liberties with data they've collected - especially with no accountable opt-out for people who've already handed their data over with no expectation of this sort of behavior - I'd still like to know more about what's actually gonig on before jumping on the FUD bandwagon.Oh, and seriously... if they are up to no good, do you really think deleting your account is going to make a difference?
We're talking about the Internet; once you put something in, you can't take it back out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31499414</id>
	<title>Re:Deleting does no good</title>
	<author>RJFerret</author>
	<datestamp>1268768400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only if you seek pseudo-connections.</p><p>Want to go rock climbing?  Oh wait, we organize those trips via Twitter...</p><p>How about grabbing a burger before hitting the gym?  Oh wait, those invites are texted too...</p><p>Why didn't you show up for the movie this past weekend?</p><p>Want to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... ad nauseam?  Oh wait, you never read my invite because you ignored my letter to you.  I don't know why, it was brief and sent right to your RSS/email/computer/phone/however you read Twitter/equivalents--you didn't even have to wait for the mailman and walk out to your mailbox!</p><p>Twitter is just a convenient service, like a phone line or SMS and it IS RL, just as much as those are.  How you use it depends on you and your social circles obviously.  You might just find your social circles expanded by virtue of sharing yourself with more people.  Particularly if you aren't trivially judgmental.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><p>-Randy</p><p>PS: The brand of service doesn't matter, most people seem to use the one their peers use.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only if you seek pseudo-connections.Want to go rock climbing ?
Oh wait , we organize those trips via Twitter...How about grabbing a burger before hitting the gym ?
Oh wait , those invites are texted too...Why did n't you show up for the movie this past weekend ? Want to ... ad nauseam ?
Oh wait , you never read my invite because you ignored my letter to you .
I do n't know why , it was brief and sent right to your RSS/email/computer/phone/however you read Twitter/equivalents--you did n't even have to wait for the mailman and walk out to your mailbox ! Twitter is just a convenient service , like a phone line or SMS and it IS RL , just as much as those are .
How you use it depends on you and your social circles obviously .
You might just find your social circles expanded by virtue of sharing yourself with more people .
Particularly if you are n't trivially judgmental .
; - ) -RandyPS : The brand of service does n't matter , most people seem to use the one their peers use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only if you seek pseudo-connections.Want to go rock climbing?
Oh wait, we organize those trips via Twitter...How about grabbing a burger before hitting the gym?
Oh wait, those invites are texted too...Why didn't you show up for the movie this past weekend?Want to ... ad nauseam?
Oh wait, you never read my invite because you ignored my letter to you.
I don't know why, it was brief and sent right to your RSS/email/computer/phone/however you read Twitter/equivalents--you didn't even have to wait for the mailman and walk out to your mailbox!Twitter is just a convenient service, like a phone line or SMS and it IS RL, just as much as those are.
How you use it depends on you and your social circles obviously.
You might just find your social circles expanded by virtue of sharing yourself with more people.
Particularly if you aren't trivially judgmental.
;-)-RandyPS: The brand of service doesn't matter, most people seem to use the one their peers use.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495378</id>
	<title>simple myspace prophylactic rumor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268753520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>there is a simple prophylactic: just spread the rumor that myspace causes spleen cancer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>there is a simple prophylactic : just spread the rumor that myspace causes spleen cancer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there is a simple prophylactic: just spread the rumor that myspace causes spleen cancer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497444</id>
	<title>Re:Deleting does no good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268760780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>baseless and ad-hominem accusations of ignorance is not merely defense, but fanboi-level defense,</p></div><p>...</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously... if you want connectedness and socialization, get out of Mom's basement. Or write a letter. You know, pen on paper? Or get together with real human beings.</p></div><p>U R REEL DUM</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>baseless and ad-hominem accusations of ignorance is not merely defense , but fanboi-level defense,...Seriously... if you want connectedness and socialization , get out of Mom 's basement .
Or write a letter .
You know , pen on paper ?
Or get together with real human beings.U R REEL DUM</tokentext>
<sentencetext>baseless and ad-hominem accusations of ignorance is not merely defense, but fanboi-level defense,...Seriously... if you want connectedness and socialization, get out of Mom's basement.
Or write a letter.
You know, pen on paper?
Or get together with real human beings.U R REEL DUM
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496546</id>
	<title>What's my cut?</title>
	<author>acoustix</author>
	<datestamp>1268757840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After all, it *is* my information that they're selling - correct?  Why do we allow companies to profit from our information?  I should be paid a royalty for my information regardless of how they acquired it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After all , it * is * my information that they 're selling - correct ?
Why do we allow companies to profit from our information ?
I should be paid a royalty for my information regardless of how they acquired it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After all, it *is* my information that they're selling - correct?
Why do we allow companies to profit from our information?
I should be paid a royalty for my information regardless of how they acquired it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496240</id>
	<title>Re:Slashdot to sell..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268756640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are they circumcised  or no? That makes all the difference to me; I prefer uncut<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-0</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are they circumcised or no ?
That makes all the difference to me ; I prefer uncut ; -0</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are they circumcised  or no?
That makes all the difference to me; I prefer uncut ;-0</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496362</id>
	<title>Re:MySpace? Who cares? You should be concerned abo</title>
	<author>CyborgWarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1268757360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think Facebook is going to go another route. By maintaining control of the data itself, Facebook is essentially creating a monopoly of the best targeted advertising data ever. Their policies are such that they can broker this data and sell it to the highest bidder. Or display ads to the highest bidder like they do right now. They make a good amount of money straight off of the advertisement bids and I'm sure they have much bigger schemes for reselling the data again. The more they keep their own shtick together the more valuable that particular data becomes and the higher rates they can charge for it. Google makes insane money off of their directed advertising and Facebook has them beat in quality of targeting by far. When it comes down to it, in the long run Facebook will have the deepest pockets all by itself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Facebook is going to go another route .
By maintaining control of the data itself , Facebook is essentially creating a monopoly of the best targeted advertising data ever .
Their policies are such that they can broker this data and sell it to the highest bidder .
Or display ads to the highest bidder like they do right now .
They make a good amount of money straight off of the advertisement bids and I 'm sure they have much bigger schemes for reselling the data again .
The more they keep their own shtick together the more valuable that particular data becomes and the higher rates they can charge for it .
Google makes insane money off of their directed advertising and Facebook has them beat in quality of targeting by far .
When it comes down to it , in the long run Facebook will have the deepest pockets all by itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Facebook is going to go another route.
By maintaining control of the data itself, Facebook is essentially creating a monopoly of the best targeted advertising data ever.
Their policies are such that they can broker this data and sell it to the highest bidder.
Or display ads to the highest bidder like they do right now.
They make a good amount of money straight off of the advertisement bids and I'm sure they have much bigger schemes for reselling the data again.
The more they keep their own shtick together the more valuable that particular data becomes and the higher rates they can charge for it.
Google makes insane money off of their directed advertising and Facebook has them beat in quality of targeting by far.
When it comes down to it, in the long run Facebook will have the deepest pockets all by itself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497532</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>houghi</author>
	<datestamp>1268761200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I do as well. Once I replied on a posting on Usenet in a Usenet abuse group which was about childporn. I also send complaints to the (Belgian) police and the provider about the site.</p><p>The police then tried to treaten me with distribution of childporn (the reply still had the URL), onstruction of an onghoing investigation (as I also had contacted the newspaper that the link was still there after a week or so) and to be on topic falcification of data as I had not enterd my real details in the free account.</p><p>Luckily my then employer was very understanding after talking 30 seconds to me after the call from the police who told them they needed to talk to me concerning a child porn investigation. I just showed the IT manager what I had posted.</p><p>As I had done nothing wrong, I was happily willing to go to them. I even thought they might thank me for informing them about the site.  It was the opposite and only afterwards I realized I could have lost my job due to their handling things they did.<br>Strangely since then I have not seen anything illigal on the Internets.</p><p>So depending on where you live, they could use the fact that you falsify your data against you. That said, I still use fake information. I use a gmail account solely for the purpose of entering an adress (named houghi.spam@gmail.com) or if no verification f the adress is needed, I use abuse@example.com where example.com is the FQDN of the site I am visiting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do as well .
Once I replied on a posting on Usenet in a Usenet abuse group which was about childporn .
I also send complaints to the ( Belgian ) police and the provider about the site.The police then tried to treaten me with distribution of childporn ( the reply still had the URL ) , onstruction of an onghoing investigation ( as I also had contacted the newspaper that the link was still there after a week or so ) and to be on topic falcification of data as I had not enterd my real details in the free account.Luckily my then employer was very understanding after talking 30 seconds to me after the call from the police who told them they needed to talk to me concerning a child porn investigation .
I just showed the IT manager what I had posted.As I had done nothing wrong , I was happily willing to go to them .
I even thought they might thank me for informing them about the site .
It was the opposite and only afterwards I realized I could have lost my job due to their handling things they did.Strangely since then I have not seen anything illigal on the Internets.So depending on where you live , they could use the fact that you falsify your data against you .
That said , I still use fake information .
I use a gmail account solely for the purpose of entering an adress ( named houghi.spam @ gmail.com ) or if no verification f the adress is needed , I use abuse @ example.com where example.com is the FQDN of the site I am visiting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do as well.
Once I replied on a posting on Usenet in a Usenet abuse group which was about childporn.
I also send complaints to the (Belgian) police and the provider about the site.The police then tried to treaten me with distribution of childporn (the reply still had the URL), onstruction of an onghoing investigation (as I also had contacted the newspaper that the link was still there after a week or so) and to be on topic falcification of data as I had not enterd my real details in the free account.Luckily my then employer was very understanding after talking 30 seconds to me after the call from the police who told them they needed to talk to me concerning a child porn investigation.
I just showed the IT manager what I had posted.As I had done nothing wrong, I was happily willing to go to them.
I even thought they might thank me for informing them about the site.
It was the opposite and only afterwards I realized I could have lost my job due to their handling things they did.Strangely since then I have not seen anything illigal on the Internets.So depending on where you live, they could use the fact that you falsify your data against you.
That said, I still use fake information.
I use a gmail account solely for the purpose of entering an adress (named houghi.spam@gmail.com) or if no verification f the adress is needed, I use abuse@example.com where example.com is the FQDN of the site I am visiting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495922</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268755440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is nothing you can do to ensure that data you've already entered is gone.  Even if you delete photos and change the info, there's no guarantee that the previous info is not stored.  That being said, I deleted my account when I saw this earlier this morning on another site.  When they asked me why I was deleting the account, I checked "Privacy concerns."  In the comments section, I pasted a quote from the article noting what they were selling and followed it up with a single word: Bye.  If enough people do this, Facebook will get the message that users are unhappy with this decision, even if deleting the account doesn't protect already-entered data.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is nothing you can do to ensure that data you 've already entered is gone .
Even if you delete photos and change the info , there 's no guarantee that the previous info is not stored .
That being said , I deleted my account when I saw this earlier this morning on another site .
When they asked me why I was deleting the account , I checked " Privacy concerns .
" In the comments section , I pasted a quote from the article noting what they were selling and followed it up with a single word : Bye .
If enough people do this , Facebook will get the message that users are unhappy with this decision , even if deleting the account does n't protect already-entered data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is nothing you can do to ensure that data you've already entered is gone.
Even if you delete photos and change the info, there's no guarantee that the previous info is not stored.
That being said, I deleted my account when I saw this earlier this morning on another site.
When they asked me why I was deleting the account, I checked "Privacy concerns.
"  In the comments section, I pasted a quote from the article noting what they were selling and followed it up with a single word: Bye.
If enough people do this, Facebook will get the message that users are unhappy with this decision, even if deleting the account doesn't protect already-entered data.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495726</id>
	<title>Already public?  What's the problem?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268754840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does this include public AND private profiles, or just public?  If it's just public profiles, then the information they're talking about is already public.  You can either spider the MySpace site yourself to collect the same data, or you can spare everyone the bandwidth charges and get a bulk copy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this include public AND private profiles , or just public ?
If it 's just public profiles , then the information they 're talking about is already public .
You can either spider the MySpace site yourself to collect the same data , or you can spare everyone the bandwidth charges and get a bulk copy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this include public AND private profiles, or just public?
If it's just public profiles, then the information they're talking about is already public.
You can either spider the MySpace site yourself to collect the same data, or you can spare everyone the bandwidth charges and get a bulk copy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495624</id>
	<title>Re:Deleting does no good</title>
	<author>mpe</author>
	<datestamp>1268754480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I don't think deleting your Myspace account will do anything. They already have your data and you already agreed to allow them to redistribute it, just because you delete your account doesn't mean they have to delete your data.</i> <br> <br>Might be better to somehow "pollute" the data first...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think deleting your Myspace account will do anything .
They already have your data and you already agreed to allow them to redistribute it , just because you delete your account does n't mean they have to delete your data .
Might be better to somehow " pollute " the data first.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think deleting your Myspace account will do anything.
They already have your data and you already agreed to allow them to redistribute it, just because you delete your account doesn't mean they have to delete your data.
Might be better to somehow "pollute" the data first...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496066</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>g0bshiTe</author>
	<datestamp>1268756040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course if you did this in the first place as I did, you have little to be concerned with, and with a photo that is 10 years old, good luck using that to identify me especially seeing how when i registered i never used my name or any valid information other than a real email address and my city complete with incorrect zip code. I did the same 3 years ago when I signed up for Facebook. Once I started hear how Facebook handles this data, I am glad I chose to do it.
<br> <br>Which begs another question which should probably be under Ask Slashdot. How many users here create accounts using real information, aside from sites like PayPal or where it would be required for your activities. I'm talking like email accounts, MySpace, Facebook, or even<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.  I'd be interested to know if I'm the only one using false information in 98\% of my online endeavors.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course if you did this in the first place as I did , you have little to be concerned with , and with a photo that is 10 years old , good luck using that to identify me especially seeing how when i registered i never used my name or any valid information other than a real email address and my city complete with incorrect zip code .
I did the same 3 years ago when I signed up for Facebook .
Once I started hear how Facebook handles this data , I am glad I chose to do it .
Which begs another question which should probably be under Ask Slashdot .
How many users here create accounts using real information , aside from sites like PayPal or where it would be required for your activities .
I 'm talking like email accounts , MySpace , Facebook , or even / .
I 'd be interested to know if I 'm the only one using false information in 98 \ % of my online endeavors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course if you did this in the first place as I did, you have little to be concerned with, and with a photo that is 10 years old, good luck using that to identify me especially seeing how when i registered i never used my name or any valid information other than a real email address and my city complete with incorrect zip code.
I did the same 3 years ago when I signed up for Facebook.
Once I started hear how Facebook handles this data, I am glad I chose to do it.
Which begs another question which should probably be under Ask Slashdot.
How many users here create accounts using real information, aside from sites like PayPal or where it would be required for your activities.
I'm talking like email accounts, MySpace, Facebook, or even /.
I'd be interested to know if I'm the only one using false information in 98\% of my online endeavors.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495484</id>
	<title>Re:Deleting does no good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268753940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;They already have your data and you already agreed to allow them to redistribute it, just because you delete your account doesn't mean they have to delete your data.</p><p>Well, the cancellation page says:</p><p>"WARNING: Cancelling your MySpace account will permanently remove all of your profile information from MySpace, including your photos, comments, blog entries, videos, and your personal network of friends. This information cannot be restored. You may re-register your current email address after cancelling, but you will need to rebuild your personal network from scratch. "</p><p>Which seems to suggest that they will delete your data - assuming you're prepared to believe anything spewing from the many fetid mouths of the Murdochian Empire.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; They already have your data and you already agreed to allow them to redistribute it , just because you delete your account does n't mean they have to delete your data.Well , the cancellation page says : " WARNING : Cancelling your MySpace account will permanently remove all of your profile information from MySpace , including your photos , comments , blog entries , videos , and your personal network of friends .
This information can not be restored .
You may re-register your current email address after cancelling , but you will need to rebuild your personal network from scratch .
" Which seems to suggest that they will delete your data - assuming you 're prepared to believe anything spewing from the many fetid mouths of the Murdochian Empire .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;They already have your data and you already agreed to allow them to redistribute it, just because you delete your account doesn't mean they have to delete your data.Well, the cancellation page says:"WARNING: Cancelling your MySpace account will permanently remove all of your profile information from MySpace, including your photos, comments, blog entries, videos, and your personal network of friends.
This information cannot be restored.
You may re-register your current email address after cancelling, but you will need to rebuild your personal network from scratch.
"Which seems to suggest that they will delete your data - assuming you're prepared to believe anything spewing from the many fetid mouths of the Murdochian Empire.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31500428</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>Hotawa Hawk-eye</author>
	<datestamp>1268772540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The only way I can think of removing your information is to edit your profile with random information that makes sense but is generic.</p></div></blockquote><p>
"The only winning move is not to play."<br> <br>
Alternately, if you REALLY want to get them to remove your information quickly, include information copyrighted by the C* of Scientology [replace the wildcard with whatever you feel is appropriate] in your profile, and send the C* a link to it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only way I can think of removing your information is to edit your profile with random information that makes sense but is generic .
" The only winning move is not to play .
" Alternately , if you REALLY want to get them to remove your information quickly , include information copyrighted by the C * of Scientology [ replace the wildcard with whatever you feel is appropriate ] in your profile , and send the C * a link to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only way I can think of removing your information is to edit your profile with random information that makes sense but is generic.
"The only winning move is not to play.
" 
Alternately, if you REALLY want to get them to remove your information quickly, include information copyrighted by the C* of Scientology [replace the wildcard with whatever you feel is appropriate] in your profile, and send the C* a link to it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497932</id>
	<title>Re:Typical Murdoch</title>
	<author>thePowerOfGrayskull</author>
	<datestamp>1268762700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Since it's owned by News Corporation, it'd be fair to say that it draws from the Murdoch family's deep well of moral squalor.  So selling user data to the highest bidder, in addition to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MySpace#Religious\_discrimination" title="wikipedia.org">attacking Murdoch's ideological enemies</a> [wikipedia.org], is being just true to form for these people.</p><p>I can't say I'm surprised.</p></div><p>And for reference you provide a hearsay account posted to a Wikipedia article, wherein someone accuses MySpace of a behavior with nothing to back it up. Clicking the source link for the story, we find that it's no longer valid. I'm not saying that you're wrong, but I am saying that better sources might be in order...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since it 's owned by News Corporation , it 'd be fair to say that it draws from the Murdoch family 's deep well of moral squalor .
So selling user data to the highest bidder , in addition to attacking Murdoch 's ideological enemies [ wikipedia.org ] , is being just true to form for these people.I ca n't say I 'm surprised.And for reference you provide a hearsay account posted to a Wikipedia article , wherein someone accuses MySpace of a behavior with nothing to back it up .
Clicking the source link for the story , we find that it 's no longer valid .
I 'm not saying that you 're wrong , but I am saying that better sources might be in order.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since it's owned by News Corporation, it'd be fair to say that it draws from the Murdoch family's deep well of moral squalor.
So selling user data to the highest bidder, in addition to attacking Murdoch's ideological enemies [wikipedia.org], is being just true to form for these people.I can't say I'm surprised.And for reference you provide a hearsay account posted to a Wikipedia article, wherein someone accuses MySpace of a behavior with nothing to back it up.
Clicking the source link for the story, we find that it's no longer valid.
I'm not saying that you're wrong, but I am saying that better sources might be in order...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496316</id>
	<title>Re:MySpace? Who cares? You should be concerned abo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268757060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By all means, share my info. I've spent the last few years using social networking sites to do nothing but build up a public history as a conscientious objector.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By all means , share my info .
I 've spent the last few years using social networking sites to do nothing but build up a public history as a conscientious objector .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By all means, share my info.
I've spent the last few years using social networking sites to do nothing but build up a public history as a conscientious objector.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31502894</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268741880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they're keeping old "versions" of your page, you might want to do it a few times so that they eventually have to actually delete the real stuff and all that's left are like 10 different versions of crap.  They don't keep an infinite number of versions (there has to be some limit) so all you have to do is to change it like 10 or 20 times (or more depending on how paranoid you are) until you're confident you've hit the limit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they 're keeping old " versions " of your page , you might want to do it a few times so that they eventually have to actually delete the real stuff and all that 's left are like 10 different versions of crap .
They do n't keep an infinite number of versions ( there has to be some limit ) so all you have to do is to change it like 10 or 20 times ( or more depending on how paranoid you are ) until you 're confident you 've hit the limit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they're keeping old "versions" of your page, you might want to do it a few times so that they eventually have to actually delete the real stuff and all that's left are like 10 different versions of crap.
They don't keep an infinite number of versions (there has to be some limit) so all you have to do is to change it like 10 or 20 times (or more depending on how paranoid you are) until you're confident you've hit the limit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495614</id>
	<title>News Corp *snicker*</title>
	<author>HangingChad</author>
	<datestamp>1268754420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What do you expect from a company that gets a lot of its funding <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/1566018/crib-sheet-prince-alwaleed" title="fastcompany.com">from Saudi Arabia</a> [fastcompany.com]?  Murdoch is also <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/news-corp-to-buy-70-million-stake-in-saudi-firm-2010-02-23?reflink=MW\_news\_stmp" title="marketwatch.com">investing in Saudi companies owned by the same person</a> [marketwatch.com].

</p><p>If partnering up with one of the most oppressive regimes on the planet is all in a days work, how does your personal information on MySpace rate any concern?

</p><p>Funny it never dawns on a certain segment of our population that one of our major cable news sources is heavily influenced by the Saudis.  That would be particularly noticeable, on topics related to climate change.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What do you expect from a company that gets a lot of its funding from Saudi Arabia [ fastcompany.com ] ?
Murdoch is also investing in Saudi companies owned by the same person [ marketwatch.com ] .
If partnering up with one of the most oppressive regimes on the planet is all in a days work , how does your personal information on MySpace rate any concern ?
Funny it never dawns on a certain segment of our population that one of our major cable news sources is heavily influenced by the Saudis .
That would be particularly noticeable , on topics related to climate change .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do you expect from a company that gets a lot of its funding from Saudi Arabia [fastcompany.com]?
Murdoch is also investing in Saudi companies owned by the same person [marketwatch.com].
If partnering up with one of the most oppressive regimes on the planet is all in a days work, how does your personal information on MySpace rate any concern?
Funny it never dawns on a certain segment of our population that one of our major cable news sources is heavily influenced by the Saudis.
That would be particularly noticeable, on topics related to climate change.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497232</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268760060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is why my name, age, location, and photo are and always have been fake.  I only had a myspace account because some people wouldn't talk to me any other way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why my name , age , location , and photo are and always have been fake .
I only had a myspace account because some people would n't talk to me any other way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why my name, age, location, and photo are and always have been fake.
I only had a myspace account because some people wouldn't talk to me any other way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31500440</id>
	<title>Re:Deleting does no good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268772540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>It's amazing that people will trade the labours of their mind for mere web hosting.</p></div><p>It's amazing people consider facebook and myspace as "mere web hosting;"  social networks are about <i>connectedness</i>.  I am not defending them, but you're trivializing these communities and showing your ignorance.</p></div><p>"connectedness" is their marketing term, and not really something that is actually practiced or even encouraged on either website. It's pretty much a buzzword at this point. A more proper term these days would be entertainment portals or something. How connected am I to someone if the only connection I have is that I fed your virtual rabbit on your virtual farm while you were at the office or spending time with your family?</p><p>Shit, I friended Obama and I just don't feel a connection with him. The guy has yet to "obama likes" any of my comments!</p><p>It's not connectedness. It's the illusion of it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's amazing that people will trade the labours of their mind for mere web hosting.It 's amazing people consider facebook and myspace as " mere web hosting ; " social networks are about connectedness .
I am not defending them , but you 're trivializing these communities and showing your ignorance .
" connectedness " is their marketing term , and not really something that is actually practiced or even encouraged on either website .
It 's pretty much a buzzword at this point .
A more proper term these days would be entertainment portals or something .
How connected am I to someone if the only connection I have is that I fed your virtual rabbit on your virtual farm while you were at the office or spending time with your family ? Shit , I friended Obama and I just do n't feel a connection with him .
The guy has yet to " obama likes " any of my comments ! It 's not connectedness .
It 's the illusion of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's amazing that people will trade the labours of their mind for mere web hosting.It's amazing people consider facebook and myspace as "mere web hosting;"  social networks are about connectedness.
I am not defending them, but you're trivializing these communities and showing your ignorance.
"connectedness" is their marketing term, and not really something that is actually practiced or even encouraged on either website.
It's pretty much a buzzword at this point.
A more proper term these days would be entertainment portals or something.
How connected am I to someone if the only connection I have is that I fed your virtual rabbit on your virtual farm while you were at the office or spending time with your family?Shit, I friended Obama and I just don't feel a connection with him.
The guy has yet to "obama likes" any of my comments!It's not connectedness.
It's the illusion of it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495446</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495314</id>
	<title>I'm surprised ...</title>
	<author>krou</author>
	<datestamp>1268753280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... that this hadn't been done sooner. Murdoch no doubt wants some return on his investment, especially since traffic seems to be <a href="http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/myspace.com#trafficstats" title="alexa.com">dropping</a> [alexa.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>... that this had n't been done sooner .
Murdoch no doubt wants some return on his investment , especially since traffic seems to be dropping [ alexa.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... that this hadn't been done sooner.
Murdoch no doubt wants some return on his investment, especially since traffic seems to be dropping [alexa.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495604</id>
	<title>Re:What is myspace?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268754360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Specifically they're going to be tailoring ads specific towards you. They're going to know the music you wear, and the type of comments you post, that kind of stuff. They'll then be able to tell what ads you've rolled over for how long, suggesting what advertising might be working on you, and remove the ones that aren't. On top of that, they'll be using a GeoIP database to target your city.</p><p>Myspace has become Theirspace. Their advertising space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Specifically they 're going to be tailoring ads specific towards you .
They 're going to know the music you wear , and the type of comments you post , that kind of stuff .
They 'll then be able to tell what ads you 've rolled over for how long , suggesting what advertising might be working on you , and remove the ones that are n't .
On top of that , they 'll be using a GeoIP database to target your city.Myspace has become Theirspace .
Their advertising space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Specifically they're going to be tailoring ads specific towards you.
They're going to know the music you wear, and the type of comments you post, that kind of stuff.
They'll then be able to tell what ads you've rolled over for how long, suggesting what advertising might be working on you, and remove the ones that aren't.
On top of that, they'll be using a GeoIP database to target your city.Myspace has become Theirspace.
Their advertising space.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496154</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1268756400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Better yet, poison the well. Change your account data to be complete garbage. It's going to skew their demographics and reduce the value of the data.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Better yet , poison the well .
Change your account data to be complete garbage .
It 's going to skew their demographics and reduce the value of the data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better yet, poison the well.
Change your account data to be complete garbage.
It's going to skew their demographics and reduce the value of the data.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31498308</id>
	<title>To Delete vs. Not To Delete</title>
	<author>psbrogna</author>
	<datestamp>1268764140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree that deleting your account may not be the best course of action if protecting your personal data is the ultimate goal. However, if MySpace does see a spike in deletes as a result of this announcement they may figure out that selling out may cost them equity they don't want to lose.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree that deleting your account may not be the best course of action if protecting your personal data is the ultimate goal .
However , if MySpace does see a spike in deletes as a result of this announcement they may figure out that selling out may cost them equity they do n't want to lose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree that deleting your account may not be the best course of action if protecting your personal data is the ultimate goal.
However, if MySpace does see a spike in deletes as a result of this announcement they may figure out that selling out may cost them equity they don't want to lose.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495778</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>shabtai87</author>
	<datestamp>1268755080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But it's not too late to stop giving them any more data!</p><p><a href="http://suicidemachine.org/" title="suicidemachine.org" rel="nofollow">http://suicidemachine.org/</a> [suicidemachine.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But it 's not too late to stop giving them any more data ! http : //suicidemachine.org/ [ suicidemachine.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it's not too late to stop giving them any more data!http://suicidemachine.org/ [suicidemachine.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496780</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>mlush</author>
	<datestamp>1268758560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I drive a bunch of kids to school.
They all have two accounts, one real and one fake.
-learn from them...</p>
 </div><p>This is moderately effective against snooping parents and teachers,  but its moot to the hosting company,  in fact they probably like it as they get to sell two 'users' data for the price of one</p><p>The only safe options are:-
</p><ul>
<li>Don't put it on line</li><li>Run their own servers</li></ul><p>
For you schoolkids option 2. could be viable. There <a href="http://www.vivalogo.com/vl-resources/open-source-social-networking-software.htm" title="vivalogo.com" rel="nofollow">Apprear</a> [vivalogo.com] to be a number of free options.  OTOH I could see a whole pit of trouble for the admin if things go sour.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I drive a bunch of kids to school .
They all have two accounts , one real and one fake .
-learn from them.. . This is moderately effective against snooping parents and teachers , but its moot to the hosting company , in fact they probably like it as they get to sell two 'users ' data for the price of oneThe only safe options are : - Do n't put it on lineRun their own servers For you schoolkids option 2. could be viable .
There Apprear [ vivalogo.com ] to be a number of free options .
OTOH I could see a whole pit of trouble for the admin if things go sour .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I drive a bunch of kids to school.
They all have two accounts, one real and one fake.
-learn from them...
 This is moderately effective against snooping parents and teachers,  but its moot to the hosting company,  in fact they probably like it as they get to sell two 'users' data for the price of oneThe only safe options are:-

Don't put it on lineRun their own servers
For you schoolkids option 2. could be viable.
There Apprear [vivalogo.com] to be a number of free options.
OTOH I could see a whole pit of trouble for the admin if things go sour.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495978</id>
	<title>Why panic now?</title>
	<author>HalAtWork</author>
	<datestamp>1268755620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why panic now?  What's been stopping marketing/statistic entities from scraping and aggregating that data all along, from many sites?  Perhaps there are agreements they have to sign to access the information, but how can anyone find out that's what they're doing if all they do is sell the aggregate data?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why panic now ?
What 's been stopping marketing/statistic entities from scraping and aggregating that data all along , from many sites ?
Perhaps there are agreements they have to sign to access the information , but how can anyone find out that 's what they 're doing if all they do is sell the aggregate data ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why panic now?
What's been stopping marketing/statistic entities from scraping and aggregating that data all along, from many sites?
Perhaps there are agreements they have to sign to access the information, but how can anyone find out that's what they're doing if all they do is sell the aggregate data?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495754</id>
	<title>Re:Deleting does no good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268755020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Social networks are about pseudo-connectedness. Yes, they facilitate (i.e., make easier) real existing connections of actual social value, but they also enable (i.e., make possible) false connections with no actual underlying social significance. Witness Facebookers who have literally 4-5 digit numbers of "friends", or who "friend" commercial and marketing entities, or who have dozens of friends they've never met IRL and never will.</p><p>Let's face it, RL is all that actually matters.</p><p>That said, it's almost impossible to trivialize those "communities" beyond their inherent triviality. Furthermore, baseless and ad-hominem accusations of ignorance is not merely defense, but fanboi-level defense, and is probably one of the few things which <strong>can</strong> make the shallow inanity of these social networks glaringly obvious.</p><p>Seriously... if you want connectedness and socialization, get out of Mom's basement. Or write a letter. You know, pen on paper? Or get together with real human beings.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Social networks are about pseudo-connectedness .
Yes , they facilitate ( i.e. , make easier ) real existing connections of actual social value , but they also enable ( i.e. , make possible ) false connections with no actual underlying social significance .
Witness Facebookers who have literally 4-5 digit numbers of " friends " , or who " friend " commercial and marketing entities , or who have dozens of friends they 've never met IRL and never will.Let 's face it , RL is all that actually matters.That said , it 's almost impossible to trivialize those " communities " beyond their inherent triviality .
Furthermore , baseless and ad-hominem accusations of ignorance is not merely defense , but fanboi-level defense , and is probably one of the few things which can make the shallow inanity of these social networks glaringly obvious.Seriously... if you want connectedness and socialization , get out of Mom 's basement .
Or write a letter .
You know , pen on paper ?
Or get together with real human beings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Social networks are about pseudo-connectedness.
Yes, they facilitate (i.e., make easier) real existing connections of actual social value, but they also enable (i.e., make possible) false connections with no actual underlying social significance.
Witness Facebookers who have literally 4-5 digit numbers of "friends", or who "friend" commercial and marketing entities, or who have dozens of friends they've never met IRL and never will.Let's face it, RL is all that actually matters.That said, it's almost impossible to trivialize those "communities" beyond their inherent triviality.
Furthermore, baseless and ad-hominem accusations of ignorance is not merely defense, but fanboi-level defense, and is probably one of the few things which can make the shallow inanity of these social networks glaringly obvious.Seriously... if you want connectedness and socialization, get out of Mom's basement.
Or write a letter.
You know, pen on paper?
Or get together with real human beings.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495446</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496976</id>
	<title>Re:I Still Use It...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268759220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>&lt;blink&gt; was a choice. 'Nuff sed.</p></div><p>Aaargh! You forgot to close the tag! Now my entire internet is blinking!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>was a choice .
'Nuff sed.Aaargh !
You forgot to close the tag !
Now my entire internet is blinking !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> was a choice.
'Nuff sed.Aaargh!
You forgot to close the tag!
Now my entire internet is blinking!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31500492</id>
	<title>may the strong survive, may the weak perish.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268772780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>myspace and all that other web 2.0'rhea was from the start a marketing gimmick, I smelled them out as most of you all<br>did. We the intellegencia abstain.</p><p>May this all be a lesson for the ignorant; may the stout minded shake their heads and ruminate.</p><p>There will be more days like this.</p><p>ag.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>myspace and all that other web 2.0'rhea was from the start a marketing gimmick , I smelled them out as most of you alldid .
We the intellegencia abstain.May this all be a lesson for the ignorant ; may the stout minded shake their heads and ruminate.There will be more days like this.ag .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>myspace and all that other web 2.0'rhea was from the start a marketing gimmick, I smelled them out as most of you alldid.
We the intellegencia abstain.May this all be a lesson for the ignorant; may the stout minded shake their heads and ruminate.There will be more days like this.ag.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495954</id>
	<title>Re:WTF!!</title>
	<author>dingen</author>
	<datestamp>1268755560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, because if you can't see it, it has to be gone.</p><p>Same with editting. Like they don't store the previous versions of your profile.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , because if you ca n't see it , it has to be gone.Same with editting .
Like they do n't store the previous versions of your profile .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, because if you can't see it, it has to be gone.Same with editting.
Like they don't store the previous versions of your profile.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495680</id>
	<title>Re:Deleting does no good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268754660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Soooooo, don't delete it.</p><p>Populate it with flagrantly bogus / made-up data.  May as well poison the well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Soooooo , do n't delete it.Populate it with flagrantly bogus / made-up data .
May as well poison the well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Soooooo, don't delete it.Populate it with flagrantly bogus / made-up data.
May as well poison the well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495176</id>
	<title>How Stupid do you have to be</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268752800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To let Rupert Murdoch own your personal information . . . geez!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To let Rupert Murdoch own your personal information .
. .
geez !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To let Rupert Murdoch own your personal information .
. .
geez!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495620</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268754420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The only way I can think of removing your information is to edit your profile with random information that makes sense but is generic. Replace all critical information such as addresses or phone numbers with fake addresses. Remove all photos and just have a few generic stock photos. The idea is to make the account look legit but with no information that can be used against you.




This will correct the issue of current viewable information. Next you need to lock down your profile with as much security as possible, disable messages, turn on approvals for anything, lock it down like Fort Knox so it stays static as long as possible.




Now comes the part you have no control over. You need to let the account sit for months if not years. Over time they (Myspace or Facebook) will need to purge older backups and can only keep current relevant information. So now the older backups are over-written and being written into the system is your current BS profile, but this can take months to years to do and that depends on how much Myspace/Facebook or any social site is willing to retain.




Whatever you do, don't just delete the account or use their automated deletion system cause that's not really doing the job you want. That most likely puts it into a special repository for recoveries in case you want to come back.</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>The only way I can think of removing your information is to edit your profile with random information that makes sense but is generic. Replace all critical information such as addresses or phone numbers with fake addresses. Remove all photos and just have a few generic stock photos. The idea is to make the account look legit but with no information that can be used against you.




This will correct the issue of current viewable information. Next you need to lock down your profile with as much security as possible, disable messages, turn on approvals for anything, lock it down like Fort Knox so it stays static as long as possible.




Now comes the part you have no control over. You need to let the account sit for months if not years. Over time they (Myspace or Facebook) will need to purge older backups and can only keep current relevant information. So now the older backups are over-written and being written into the system is your current BS profile, but this can take months to years to do and that depends on how much Myspace/Facebook or any social site is willing to retain.




Whatever you do, don't just delete the account or use their automated deletion system cause that's not really doing the job you want. That most likely puts it into a special repository for recoveries in case you want to come back.</p></div><p>A good idea, but it may not be necessary to wait.  Just change the user info and cancel the account.   A company selling a list of user data, wont try to figure out which is the accurate information, they will just use the most recent.   Based on some direct mail marketing experience years ago, a list  a year old is expected to have incorrect addresses for approximately 10\% to 20\%..  Many companies wont buy a list older than 90 or 180 days.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only way I can think of removing your information is to edit your profile with random information that makes sense but is generic .
Replace all critical information such as addresses or phone numbers with fake addresses .
Remove all photos and just have a few generic stock photos .
The idea is to make the account look legit but with no information that can be used against you .
This will correct the issue of current viewable information .
Next you need to lock down your profile with as much security as possible , disable messages , turn on approvals for anything , lock it down like Fort Knox so it stays static as long as possible .
Now comes the part you have no control over .
You need to let the account sit for months if not years .
Over time they ( Myspace or Facebook ) will need to purge older backups and can only keep current relevant information .
So now the older backups are over-written and being written into the system is your current BS profile , but this can take months to years to do and that depends on how much Myspace/Facebook or any social site is willing to retain .
Whatever you do , do n't just delete the account or use their automated deletion system cause that 's not really doing the job you want .
That most likely puts it into a special repository for recoveries in case you want to come back.The only way I can think of removing your information is to edit your profile with random information that makes sense but is generic .
Replace all critical information such as addresses or phone numbers with fake addresses .
Remove all photos and just have a few generic stock photos .
The idea is to make the account look legit but with no information that can be used against you .
This will correct the issue of current viewable information .
Next you need to lock down your profile with as much security as possible , disable messages , turn on approvals for anything , lock it down like Fort Knox so it stays static as long as possible .
Now comes the part you have no control over .
You need to let the account sit for months if not years .
Over time they ( Myspace or Facebook ) will need to purge older backups and can only keep current relevant information .
So now the older backups are over-written and being written into the system is your current BS profile , but this can take months to years to do and that depends on how much Myspace/Facebook or any social site is willing to retain .
Whatever you do , do n't just delete the account or use their automated deletion system cause that 's not really doing the job you want .
That most likely puts it into a special repository for recoveries in case you want to come back.A good idea , but it may not be necessary to wait .
Just change the user info and cancel the account .
A company selling a list of user data , wont try to figure out which is the accurate information , they will just use the most recent .
Based on some direct mail marketing experience years ago , a list a year old is expected to have incorrect addresses for approximately 10 \ % to 20 \ % .. Many companies wont buy a list older than 90 or 180 days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only way I can think of removing your information is to edit your profile with random information that makes sense but is generic.
Replace all critical information such as addresses or phone numbers with fake addresses.
Remove all photos and just have a few generic stock photos.
The idea is to make the account look legit but with no information that can be used against you.
This will correct the issue of current viewable information.
Next you need to lock down your profile with as much security as possible, disable messages, turn on approvals for anything, lock it down like Fort Knox so it stays static as long as possible.
Now comes the part you have no control over.
You need to let the account sit for months if not years.
Over time they (Myspace or Facebook) will need to purge older backups and can only keep current relevant information.
So now the older backups are over-written and being written into the system is your current BS profile, but this can take months to years to do and that depends on how much Myspace/Facebook or any social site is willing to retain.
Whatever you do, don't just delete the account or use their automated deletion system cause that's not really doing the job you want.
That most likely puts it into a special repository for recoveries in case you want to come back.The only way I can think of removing your information is to edit your profile with random information that makes sense but is generic.
Replace all critical information such as addresses or phone numbers with fake addresses.
Remove all photos and just have a few generic stock photos.
The idea is to make the account look legit but with no information that can be used against you.
This will correct the issue of current viewable information.
Next you need to lock down your profile with as much security as possible, disable messages, turn on approvals for anything, lock it down like Fort Knox so it stays static as long as possible.
Now comes the part you have no control over.
You need to let the account sit for months if not years.
Over time they (Myspace or Facebook) will need to purge older backups and can only keep current relevant information.
So now the older backups are over-written and being written into the system is your current BS profile, but this can take months to years to do and that depends on how much Myspace/Facebook or any social site is willing to retain.
Whatever you do, don't just delete the account or use their automated deletion system cause that's not really doing the job you want.
That most likely puts it into a special repository for recoveries in case you want to come back.A good idea, but it may not be necessary to wait.
Just change the user info and cancel the account.
A company selling a list of user data, wont try to figure out which is the accurate information, they will just use the most recent.
Based on some direct mail marketing experience years ago, a list  a year old is expected to have incorrect addresses for approximately 10\% to 20\%..  Many companies wont buy a list older than 90 or 180 days.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496788</id>
	<title>Re:Deleting does no good</title>
	<author>eln</author>
	<datestamp>1268758620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You forgot to tell him to get off your lawn.
<br> <br>
Face it, nobody writes pen and paper letters to anybody anymore, except maybe their great grandparents who can't use a computer and don't care to learn because they'll be dead soon anyway.  Online connections are, in many cases, just as important as RL connections.  I've gotten job offers from connections made online, in some cases people that I never actually met IRL.  Hell, I met my wife online.
<br> <br>
To say that online-only connections are meaningless is outdated and shortsighted.  Yes, if you have 5,000 friends on Facebook, chances are 4,950 of those will never be of any use to you, but that doesn't mean online social connections are inherently inferior.  Further, having meaningful social connections online does not preclude having meaningful social connections and interactions in the real world.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot to tell him to get off your lawn .
Face it , nobody writes pen and paper letters to anybody anymore , except maybe their great grandparents who ca n't use a computer and do n't care to learn because they 'll be dead soon anyway .
Online connections are , in many cases , just as important as RL connections .
I 've gotten job offers from connections made online , in some cases people that I never actually met IRL .
Hell , I met my wife online .
To say that online-only connections are meaningless is outdated and shortsighted .
Yes , if you have 5,000 friends on Facebook , chances are 4,950 of those will never be of any use to you , but that does n't mean online social connections are inherently inferior .
Further , having meaningful social connections online does not preclude having meaningful social connections and interactions in the real world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot to tell him to get off your lawn.
Face it, nobody writes pen and paper letters to anybody anymore, except maybe their great grandparents who can't use a computer and don't care to learn because they'll be dead soon anyway.
Online connections are, in many cases, just as important as RL connections.
I've gotten job offers from connections made online, in some cases people that I never actually met IRL.
Hell, I met my wife online.
To say that online-only connections are meaningless is outdated and shortsighted.
Yes, if you have 5,000 friends on Facebook, chances are 4,950 of those will never be of any use to you, but that doesn't mean online social connections are inherently inferior.
Further, having meaningful social connections online does not preclude having meaningful social connections and interactions in the real world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495710</id>
	<title>Or alternatively...</title>
	<author>rwa2</author>
	<datestamp>1268754780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now I feel like creating a MySpace account just so I can create a single review entitled "This is how I tip my hat to total suckers who pay actual money for data plainly available for free on my personal website".</p><p>/ Seriously, what kind of loser has a MySpace account?  I moved past that kind of thing after tinkering briefly with GeoCities<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now I feel like creating a MySpace account just so I can create a single review entitled " This is how I tip my hat to total suckers who pay actual money for data plainly available for free on my personal website " ./ Seriously , what kind of loser has a MySpace account ?
I moved past that kind of thing after tinkering briefly with GeoCities : -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now I feel like creating a MySpace account just so I can create a single review entitled "This is how I tip my hat to total suckers who pay actual money for data plainly available for free on my personal website"./ Seriously, what kind of loser has a MySpace account?
I moved past that kind of thing after tinkering briefly with GeoCities :-P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31501704</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268735520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>See this is why I set up the account with fake info <i>to start with</i>. I can set my nickname to my real first name or some variant of it if I want to make it more apparent to others it's me.</p><p>Let MySpace send the personal details of the person named "Not Important" living at "123 Fuckoff St." in some city and state hundred of miles away to the marketers.</p><p>Websites have shown us they can't be trusted, and have done nothing more than poison their own info well in the process. Instead of just not collecting the info to begin with, they collect it and then earn ill will from their users when they suddenly start selling it, as time goes on they will find themselves spending hundreds of thousands of dollars maintaining databases of <i>garbage information</i>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>See this is why I set up the account with fake info to start with .
I can set my nickname to my real first name or some variant of it if I want to make it more apparent to others it 's me.Let MySpace send the personal details of the person named " Not Important " living at " 123 Fuckoff St. " in some city and state hundred of miles away to the marketers.Websites have shown us they ca n't be trusted , and have done nothing more than poison their own info well in the process .
Instead of just not collecting the info to begin with , they collect it and then earn ill will from their users when they suddenly start selling it , as time goes on they will find themselves spending hundreds of thousands of dollars maintaining databases of garbage information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See this is why I set up the account with fake info to start with.
I can set my nickname to my real first name or some variant of it if I want to make it more apparent to others it's me.Let MySpace send the personal details of the person named "Not Important" living at "123 Fuckoff St." in some city and state hundred of miles away to the marketers.Websites have shown us they can't be trusted, and have done nothing more than poison their own info well in the process.
Instead of just not collecting the info to begin with, they collect it and then earn ill will from their users when they suddenly start selling it, as time goes on they will find themselves spending hundreds of thousands of dollars maintaining databases of garbage information.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31499664</id>
	<title>Re:WTF!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268769360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't delete it, they will store the information. Replace it with BS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't delete it , they will store the information .
Replace it with BS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't delete it, they will store the information.
Replace it with BS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495920</id>
	<title>pollute the data stream</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268755440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Never put your real name or any other real data into such services. I've been doing this for 15 years, and it's really hard to find me on people search sites.</p><p>A handy tip - mix and match real and fake data if you must use your real name. A real phone number and address from 15 years ago is quite handy.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>I live close to a UPS store, where I rent a box. ALL my mail goes there. The only mail I get at home is the bulk coupon junk addressed to 'resident'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Never put your real name or any other real data into such services .
I 've been doing this for 15 years , and it 's really hard to find me on people search sites.A handy tip - mix and match real and fake data if you must use your real name .
A real phone number and address from 15 years ago is quite handy .
: ) I live close to a UPS store , where I rent a box .
ALL my mail goes there .
The only mail I get at home is the bulk coupon junk addressed to 'resident' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never put your real name or any other real data into such services.
I've been doing this for 15 years, and it's really hard to find me on people search sites.A handy tip - mix and match real and fake data if you must use your real name.
A real phone number and address from 15 years ago is quite handy.
:)I live close to a UPS store, where I rent a box.
ALL my mail goes there.
The only mail I get at home is the bulk coupon junk addressed to 'resident'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495992</id>
	<title>Re:Deleting does no good</title>
	<author>D Ninja</author>
	<datestamp>1268755680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's amazing that people will trade the labours of their mind for mere web hosting.</p></div><p>I'm looking at my friend's current status updates on Facebook.  If this is the labors of the mind, I'm now really, really depressed...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's amazing that people will trade the labours of their mind for mere web hosting.I 'm looking at my friend 's current status updates on Facebook .
If this is the labors of the mind , I 'm now really , really depressed.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's amazing that people will trade the labours of their mind for mere web hosting.I'm looking at my friend's current status updates on Facebook.
If this is the labors of the mind, I'm now really, really depressed...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31498098</id>
	<title>And nothing of value was...</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1268763300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...sold.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...sold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...sold.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495228</id>
	<title>Old Site</title>
	<author>Sagelinka</author>
	<datestamp>1268752980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"playlists, mood updates, mobile updates, photos, vents, reviews, blog posts, names and zipcodes"

Now who here thinks this is wrong in some kind of way?? There is no real reason behind it other then myspace making some extra lunch money.  I might end up deleting my myspace after I do some research into this. But why I never use myspace anyway. To many kids.  Facebook is mature.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" playlists , mood updates , mobile updates , photos , vents , reviews , blog posts , names and zipcodes " Now who here thinks this is wrong in some kind of way ? ?
There is no real reason behind it other then myspace making some extra lunch money .
I might end up deleting my myspace after I do some research into this .
But why I never use myspace anyway .
To many kids .
Facebook is mature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"playlists, mood updates, mobile updates, photos, vents, reviews, blog posts, names and zipcodes"

Now who here thinks this is wrong in some kind of way??
There is no real reason behind it other then myspace making some extra lunch money.
I might end up deleting my myspace after I do some research into this.
But why I never use myspace anyway.
To many kids.
Facebook is mature.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497054</id>
	<title>Re:Deleting does no good</title>
	<author>kheldan</author>
	<datestamp>1268759460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Facebook has the same agreement and will get to selling your data to the highest bidder sooner or later.</p></div><p>Which is why I do not have any real information about myself on ANY of these sorts of sites.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Facebook has the same agreement and will get to selling your data to the highest bidder sooner or later.Which is why I do not have any real information about myself on ANY of these sorts of sites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Facebook has the same agreement and will get to selling your data to the highest bidder sooner or later.Which is why I do not have any real information about myself on ANY of these sorts of sites.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497460</id>
	<title>Re:Deleting does no good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268760840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me guess, you also want all those darn kids to get off your lawn, dagnabbit?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me guess , you also want all those darn kids to get off your lawn , dagnabbit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me guess, you also want all those darn kids to get off your lawn, dagnabbit?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495472</id>
	<title>I Still Use It...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268753880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know that Myspace gets a lot of crap for their often ugly and tasteless profile pages, but I really love being able to customize my own HTML and CSS on my profile.  It's funny to me that the often pro-choice Slashdot crowd sees these features as a bad thing.  Sure, most people choose to use awful profile templates but personally I enjoy having the choice to add some clean and simple decorations.  Facebook doesn't offer that choice, nor do they offer the choice to opt-out of a few terrible paragraphs in their ToS, which is why I left two years ago.<br> <br>I will have to re-read the new Myspace ToS before I decide whether or not to cancel my account, but if they go the way of Facebook's "We can re-license your personal photographs to whomever we want" terms then I will certainly be leaving Myspace as well.  Where will I go?  Who knows, perhaps it's time for me to clean the dust off of my personal domain.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know that Myspace gets a lot of crap for their often ugly and tasteless profile pages , but I really love being able to customize my own HTML and CSS on my profile .
It 's funny to me that the often pro-choice Slashdot crowd sees these features as a bad thing .
Sure , most people choose to use awful profile templates but personally I enjoy having the choice to add some clean and simple decorations .
Facebook does n't offer that choice , nor do they offer the choice to opt-out of a few terrible paragraphs in their ToS , which is why I left two years ago .
I will have to re-read the new Myspace ToS before I decide whether or not to cancel my account , but if they go the way of Facebook 's " We can re-license your personal photographs to whomever we want " terms then I will certainly be leaving Myspace as well .
Where will I go ?
Who knows , perhaps it 's time for me to clean the dust off of my personal domain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know that Myspace gets a lot of crap for their often ugly and tasteless profile pages, but I really love being able to customize my own HTML and CSS on my profile.
It's funny to me that the often pro-choice Slashdot crowd sees these features as a bad thing.
Sure, most people choose to use awful profile templates but personally I enjoy having the choice to add some clean and simple decorations.
Facebook doesn't offer that choice, nor do they offer the choice to opt-out of a few terrible paragraphs in their ToS, which is why I left two years ago.
I will have to re-read the new Myspace ToS before I decide whether or not to cancel my account, but if they go the way of Facebook's "We can re-license your personal photographs to whomever we want" terms then I will certainly be leaving Myspace as well.
Where will I go?
Who knows, perhaps it's time for me to clean the dust off of my personal domain.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495402</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268753640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Reasonable suggestions, unless they also are tracking changes to accounts.  In that case, they keep all the values that have ever been used.  For instance, "Hey user '1@m1337' has lived in Ohio, Florida and Tijuana".  Time to check for drugs!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reasonable suggestions , unless they also are tracking changes to accounts .
In that case , they keep all the values that have ever been used .
For instance , " Hey user '1 @ m1337 ' has lived in Ohio , Florida and Tijuana " .
Time to check for drugs !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reasonable suggestions, unless they also are tracking changes to accounts.
In that case, they keep all the values that have ever been used.
For instance, "Hey user '1@m1337' has lived in Ohio, Florida and Tijuana".
Time to check for drugs!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497156</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1268759760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use my real name whenever what I'm posting is something I'd want future employers, parents, the police, etc tying to me. I don't when that information could be used to market to me.</p><p>For instance, I'd want to get credit for solving a really confusing technical problem for someone on a Saturday afternoon. Or contributing useful work to an open-source project. That way, when someone who I'm trying to impress Googles me, they find out all sorts of nifty stuff that I've done. (Actually, in my case, I have an added advantage in that some folks who have the same first and last name as me has done all sorts of nifty things).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use my real name whenever what I 'm posting is something I 'd want future employers , parents , the police , etc tying to me .
I do n't when that information could be used to market to me.For instance , I 'd want to get credit for solving a really confusing technical problem for someone on a Saturday afternoon .
Or contributing useful work to an open-source project .
That way , when someone who I 'm trying to impress Googles me , they find out all sorts of nifty stuff that I 've done .
( Actually , in my case , I have an added advantage in that some folks who have the same first and last name as me has done all sorts of nifty things ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use my real name whenever what I'm posting is something I'd want future employers, parents, the police, etc tying to me.
I don't when that information could be used to market to me.For instance, I'd want to get credit for solving a really confusing technical problem for someone on a Saturday afternoon.
Or contributing useful work to an open-source project.
That way, when someone who I'm trying to impress Googles me, they find out all sorts of nifty stuff that I've done.
(Actually, in my case, I have an added advantage in that some folks who have the same first and last name as me has done all sorts of nifty things).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>dunezone</author>
	<datestamp>1268753340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only way I can think of removing your information is to edit your profile with random information that makes sense but is generic. Replace all critical information such as addresses or phone numbers with fake addresses. Remove all photos and just have a few generic stock photos. The idea is to make the account look legit but with no information that can be used against you.
<br>
<br>
This will correct the issue of current viewable information. Next you need to lock down your profile with as much security as possible, disable messages, turn on approvals for anything, lock it down like Fort Knox so it stays static as long as possible.
<br>
<br>
Now comes the part you have no control over. You need to let the account sit for months if not years. Over time they (Myspace or Facebook) will need to purge older backups and can only keep current relevant information. So now the older backups are over-written and being written into the system is your current BS profile, but this can take months to years to do and that depends on how much Myspace/Facebook or any social site is willing to retain.
<br>
<br>
Whatever you do, don't just delete the account or use their automated deletion system cause that's not really doing the job you want. That most likely puts it into a special repository for recoveries in case you want to come back.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only way I can think of removing your information is to edit your profile with random information that makes sense but is generic .
Replace all critical information such as addresses or phone numbers with fake addresses .
Remove all photos and just have a few generic stock photos .
The idea is to make the account look legit but with no information that can be used against you .
This will correct the issue of current viewable information .
Next you need to lock down your profile with as much security as possible , disable messages , turn on approvals for anything , lock it down like Fort Knox so it stays static as long as possible .
Now comes the part you have no control over .
You need to let the account sit for months if not years .
Over time they ( Myspace or Facebook ) will need to purge older backups and can only keep current relevant information .
So now the older backups are over-written and being written into the system is your current BS profile , but this can take months to years to do and that depends on how much Myspace/Facebook or any social site is willing to retain .
Whatever you do , do n't just delete the account or use their automated deletion system cause that 's not really doing the job you want .
That most likely puts it into a special repository for recoveries in case you want to come back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only way I can think of removing your information is to edit your profile with random information that makes sense but is generic.
Replace all critical information such as addresses or phone numbers with fake addresses.
Remove all photos and just have a few generic stock photos.
The idea is to make the account look legit but with no information that can be used against you.
This will correct the issue of current viewable information.
Next you need to lock down your profile with as much security as possible, disable messages, turn on approvals for anything, lock it down like Fort Knox so it stays static as long as possible.
Now comes the part you have no control over.
You need to let the account sit for months if not years.
Over time they (Myspace or Facebook) will need to purge older backups and can only keep current relevant information.
So now the older backups are over-written and being written into the system is your current BS profile, but this can take months to years to do and that depends on how much Myspace/Facebook or any social site is willing to retain.
Whatever you do, don't just delete the account or use their automated deletion system cause that's not really doing the job you want.
That most likely puts it into a special repository for recoveries in case you want to come back.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496480</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>ircmaxell</author>
	<datestamp>1268757660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, unless I misunderstood their TOS, when you signed up, you granted MySPACE the right to do what it pleases with your data.  By deleting your account, aren't you thereby revoking that right from MySPACE?  So if you delete it today, and they sell it tomorrow, aren't they violating your rights (and hence are liable for the sale)...  Or do I not understand this correctly?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , unless I misunderstood their TOS , when you signed up , you granted MySPACE the right to do what it pleases with your data .
By deleting your account , are n't you thereby revoking that right from MySPACE ?
So if you delete it today , and they sell it tomorrow , are n't they violating your rights ( and hence are liable for the sale ) ... Or do I not understand this correctly ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, unless I misunderstood their TOS, when you signed up, you granted MySPACE the right to do what it pleases with your data.
By deleting your account, aren't you thereby revoking that right from MySPACE?
So if you delete it today, and they sell it tomorrow, aren't they violating your rights (and hence are liable for the sale)...  Or do I not understand this correctly?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495922</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496292</id>
	<title>Re:Deleting does no good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268756880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Keep reading the cancellation page and you will also notice MySpace is selling a bridge in Brooklyn for mere peanuts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Keep reading the cancellation page and you will also notice MySpace is selling a bridge in Brooklyn for mere peanuts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Keep reading the cancellation page and you will also notice MySpace is selling a bridge in Brooklyn for mere peanuts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495584</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>networkBoy</author>
	<datestamp>1268754300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>or you could not put real data in there to begin with?<br>My only MS account was a troll...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>or you could not put real data in there to begin with ? My only MS account was a troll.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or you could not put real data in there to begin with?My only MS account was a troll...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496348</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1268757240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean MySpace, right?  I mean, Facebook is just about as trustworthy as MySpace or a 5-year-old child at keeping your "secret" data "secret", but at least get your evil super-villain correct.</p><p>Also, if you just delete the account, they have your most recent information available for sale.  Be sure to alter the information and let the new information age a bit before deleting it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean MySpace , right ?
I mean , Facebook is just about as trustworthy as MySpace or a 5-year-old child at keeping your " secret " data " secret " , but at least get your evil super-villain correct.Also , if you just delete the account , they have your most recent information available for sale .
Be sure to alter the information and let the new information age a bit before deleting it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean MySpace, right?
I mean, Facebook is just about as trustworthy as MySpace or a 5-year-old child at keeping your "secret" data "secret", but at least get your evil super-villain correct.Also, if you just delete the account, they have your most recent information available for sale.
Be sure to alter the information and let the new information age a bit before deleting it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495922</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496260</id>
	<title>Re:What's in the data?</title>
	<author>js\_sebastian</author>
	<datestamp>1268756760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Oh, and seriously... if they are up to no good, do you really think deleting your account is going to make a difference?  We're talking about the Internet; once you put something in, you can't take it back out.</p></div><p>Up to no good? just because somebody doesn't want to have loads of his personal information sold to the highest bidder, you assume he is "up to no good"? <br> <br>

Ok, I get it, this has to be a troll... and I just bit..</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , and seriously... if they are up to no good , do you really think deleting your account is going to make a difference ?
We 're talking about the Internet ; once you put something in , you ca n't take it back out.Up to no good ?
just because somebody does n't want to have loads of his personal information sold to the highest bidder , you assume he is " up to no good " ?
Ok , I get it , this has to be a troll... and I just bit. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, and seriously... if they are up to no good, do you really think deleting your account is going to make a difference?
We're talking about the Internet; once you put something in, you can't take it back out.Up to no good?
just because somebody doesn't want to have loads of his personal information sold to the highest bidder, you assume he is "up to no good"?
Ok, I get it, this has to be a troll... and I just bit..
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497892</id>
	<title>Let the DMCA handle it...</title>
	<author>DarthStrydre</author>
	<datestamp>1268762460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Replace your profile text with the lyrics of a song you wrote, with pictures of a painting you drew and issue a Takedown notice to Myspace on your behalf. Bingo!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Replace your profile text with the lyrics of a song you wrote , with pictures of a painting you drew and issue a Takedown notice to Myspace on your behalf .
Bingo !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Replace your profile text with the lyrics of a song you wrote, with pictures of a painting you drew and issue a Takedown notice to Myspace on your behalf.
Bingo!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496620</id>
	<title>Re:Deleting does no good</title>
	<author>FlyingBishop</author>
	<datestamp>1268758080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Let's face it, RL is all that actually matters.</p></div></blockquote><p>Facebook is RL. I only have friends on Facebook that I want to talk to. Like any tool, you misuse it and it loses its efficacy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's face it , RL is all that actually matters.Facebook is RL .
I only have friends on Facebook that I want to talk to .
Like any tool , you misuse it and it loses its efficacy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's face it, RL is all that actually matters.Facebook is RL.
I only have friends on Facebook that I want to talk to.
Like any tool, you misuse it and it loses its efficacy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31502954</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>janwedekind</author>
	<datestamp>1268742300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn't work to well with something like MySpace or Facebook. Somebody else adds you as a friend, uploads a picture and tags your face, enters your detail in a search box, sends you a message,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>Furthermore they track what groups you are part of and what other profiles you are watching. Also there are social widgets on websites all over the internet. Even if nobody betrays you, they will catch you sooner or later<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't work to well with something like MySpace or Facebook .
Somebody else adds you as a friend , uploads a picture and tags your face , enters your detail in a search box , sends you a message , ...Furthermore they track what groups you are part of and what other profiles you are watching .
Also there are social widgets on websites all over the internet .
Even if nobody betrays you , they will catch you sooner or later ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't work to well with something like MySpace or Facebook.
Somebody else adds you as a friend, uploads a picture and tags your face, enters your detail in a search box, sends you a message, ...Furthermore they track what groups you are part of and what other profiles you are watching.
Also there are social widgets on websites all over the internet.
Even if nobody betrays you, they will catch you sooner or later ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495632</id>
	<title>TFS should read</title>
	<author>idontgno</author>
	<datestamp>1268754480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"So if you're worried about your data on MySpace being sold off to anybody with a few hundred dollars, now's the time to hop into the time machine and stop yourself in the past from ever opening that little-used account."</p><p>Antisocial non-networking me and other curmudgeons will try very hard to not gloat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" So if you 're worried about your data on MySpace being sold off to anybody with a few hundred dollars , now 's the time to hop into the time machine and stop yourself in the past from ever opening that little-used account .
" Antisocial non-networking me and other curmudgeons will try very hard to not gloat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"So if you're worried about your data on MySpace being sold off to anybody with a few hundred dollars, now's the time to hop into the time machine and stop yourself in the past from ever opening that little-used account.
"Antisocial non-networking me and other curmudgeons will try very hard to not gloat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495546</id>
	<title>I'll wait for the liquidation sale</title>
	<author>SlappyBastard</author>
	<datestamp>1268754120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Admittedly, depending on who does the liquidation, they may mark things up and then place a 50\% tag on the mark-up . . . but, we'll see.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Admittedly , depending on who does the liquidation , they may mark things up and then place a 50 \ % tag on the mark-up .
. .
but , we 'll see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Admittedly, depending on who does the liquidation, they may mark things up and then place a 50\% tag on the mark-up .
. .
but, we'll see.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496422</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>ZeroExistenZ</author>
	<datestamp>1268757480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are automated services for this: <a href="http://suicidemachine.org/" title="suicidemachine.org">suicidemachine.org</a> [suicidemachine.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are automated services for this : suicidemachine.org [ suicidemachine.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are automated services for this: suicidemachine.org [suicidemachine.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495140</id>
	<title>Slashdot to sell..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268752680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdot is going to have an auction for pictures of CmdrTaco's and kdawson's micropenises.  The bidding starts at 10 cents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot is going to have an auction for pictures of CmdrTaco 's and kdawson 's micropenises .
The bidding starts at 10 cents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot is going to have an auction for pictures of CmdrTaco's and kdawson's micropenises.
The bidding starts at 10 cents.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31501642</id>
	<title>Re:Typical Murdoch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268735160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It will also ensure that any online newscorp property cannot be trusted to keep your information private. With one simple little action, NewsCorp has ensured that no one (smart) will provide them with their private details again.</p><p>But then again, PayTV and Newspapers will save that company.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It will also ensure that any online newscorp property can not be trusted to keep your information private .
With one simple little action , NewsCorp has ensured that no one ( smart ) will provide them with their private details again.But then again , PayTV and Newspapers will save that company .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will also ensure that any online newscorp property cannot be trusted to keep your information private.
With one simple little action, NewsCorp has ensured that no one (smart) will provide them with their private details again.But then again, PayTV and Newspapers will save that company.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31498750</id>
	<title>Re:MySpace? Who cares? You should be concerned abo</title>
	<author>matzahboy</author>
	<datestamp>1268765880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I doubt that will happen. Yes, the data can be quite valuable, but facebook would lose a very large number of users if that happened (devaluing the company).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt that will happen .
Yes , the data can be quite valuable , but facebook would lose a very large number of users if that happened ( devaluing the company ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt that will happen.
Yes, the data can be quite valuable, but facebook would lose a very large number of users if that happened (devaluing the company).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31499502</id>
	<title>Re:What is myspace?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268768700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's a question:  Can they detect if you block all their 3rd party adservers?  Or detect if you use NukeAnything to block the myspace.com ads (and myspacecdn, and fimserve, which are necessary servers for myspace to function properly)?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's a question : Can they detect if you block all their 3rd party adservers ?
Or detect if you use NukeAnything to block the myspace.com ads ( and myspacecdn , and fimserve , which are necessary servers for myspace to function properly ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's a question:  Can they detect if you block all their 3rd party adservers?
Or detect if you use NukeAnything to block the myspace.com ads (and myspacecdn, and fimserve, which are necessary servers for myspace to function properly)?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496520</id>
	<title>Nothing to see here</title>
	<author>Jawn98685</author>
	<datestamp>1268757780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stupid people gave their personal information to some ASP who promised, in writing, to do "whatever they fucking felt like doing" with that information. Now said stupid people are shocked.
<br> <br>
Move along, now. Move along.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stupid people gave their personal information to some ASP who promised , in writing , to do " whatever they fucking felt like doing " with that information .
Now said stupid people are shocked .
Move along , now .
Move along .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stupid people gave their personal information to some ASP who promised, in writing, to do "whatever they fucking felt like doing" with that information.
Now said stupid people are shocked.
Move along, now.
Move along.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495510</id>
	<title>use myspace?</title>
	<author>runyonave</author>
	<datestamp>1268754000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>People still use this abomination of everything that is horrendous about web design?</htmltext>
<tokenext>People still use this abomination of everything that is horrendous about web design ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People still use this abomination of everything that is horrendous about web design?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495820</id>
	<title>Re:I Still Use It...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268755140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>It's funny to me that the often pro-choice Slashdot crowd sees these features as a bad thing.</i> </p><p>&lt;blink&gt; was a choice. 'Nuff sed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's funny to me that the often pro-choice Slashdot crowd sees these features as a bad thing .
was a choice .
'Nuff sed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> It's funny to me that the often pro-choice Slashdot crowd sees these features as a bad thing.
was a choice.
'Nuff sed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495472</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31501990</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>psithurism</author>
	<datestamp>1268736840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...you granted MySPACE the right to do what it pleases with your data. By deleting your account, aren't you thereby revoking that right from MySPACE?</p></div><p>So prove they are abusing your data.</p><p>I get email and especially post-office-kind mail with eerily detailed information about me all the time. I've never tried calling the companies and asking where they data mined it from (I try not to contact them if at all possible), but I don't think it would work. Obviously someone I'm doing business with is giving something away, but I don't think I'll ever be able to track them down.</p><p>The task of proving myspace sold  your data after you deleted your account would be huge and then you would have to hire a better legal team than theirs to attempt to make your argument, from which you will probably win an apology.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...you granted MySPACE the right to do what it pleases with your data .
By deleting your account , are n't you thereby revoking that right from MySPACE ? So prove they are abusing your data.I get email and especially post-office-kind mail with eerily detailed information about me all the time .
I 've never tried calling the companies and asking where they data mined it from ( I try not to contact them if at all possible ) , but I do n't think it would work .
Obviously someone I 'm doing business with is giving something away , but I do n't think I 'll ever be able to track them down.The task of proving myspace sold your data after you deleted your account would be huge and then you would have to hire a better legal team than theirs to attempt to make your argument , from which you will probably win an apology .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...you granted MySPACE the right to do what it pleases with your data.
By deleting your account, aren't you thereby revoking that right from MySPACE?So prove they are abusing your data.I get email and especially post-office-kind mail with eerily detailed information about me all the time.
I've never tried calling the companies and asking where they data mined it from (I try not to contact them if at all possible), but I don't think it would work.
Obviously someone I'm doing business with is giving something away, but I don't think I'll ever be able to track them down.The task of proving myspace sold  your data after you deleted your account would be huge and then you would have to hire a better legal team than theirs to attempt to make your argument, from which you will probably win an apology.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495446</id>
	<title>Re:Deleting does no good</title>
	<author>Chees0rz</author>
	<datestamp>1268753760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's amazing that people will trade the labours of their mind for mere web hosting.</p></div><p>It's amazing people consider facebook and myspace as "mere web hosting;"  social networks are about connectedness.  I am not defending them, but you're trivializing these communities and showing your ignorance.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's amazing that people will trade the labours of their mind for mere web hosting.It 's amazing people consider facebook and myspace as " mere web hosting ; " social networks are about connectedness .
I am not defending them , but you 're trivializing these communities and showing your ignorance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's amazing that people will trade the labours of their mind for mere web hosting.It's amazing people consider facebook and myspace as "mere web hosting;"  social networks are about connectedness.
I am not defending them, but you're trivializing these communities and showing your ignorance.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495196</id>
	<title>To collection firms?</title>
	<author>rwade</author>
	<datestamp>1268752860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"...the one-time leading social network is now selling user data to third party collection firms."</p></div><p>The term "third-party collection firm" generally leads one to think of a debt collector. There is no mention in the article of selling the data to such companies.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...the one-time leading social network is now selling user data to third party collection firms .
" The term " third-party collection firm " generally leads one to think of a debt collector .
There is no mention in the article of selling the data to such companies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...the one-time leading social network is now selling user data to third party collection firms.
"The term "third-party collection firm" generally leads one to think of a debt collector.
There is no mention in the article of selling the data to such companies.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496726</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268758440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I double-checked my info. Apparently my name is "Snads Worthy", I'm from Vermouth, Canada, zip code is somewhere in Wyoming, and I was born in 1910 (but since myspace does not allow someone to be over 100 years old, i had to make it 1911 this time). Guess I was feeling paranoid when I signed up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I double-checked my info .
Apparently my name is " Snads Worthy " , I 'm from Vermouth , Canada , zip code is somewhere in Wyoming , and I was born in 1910 ( but since myspace does not allow someone to be over 100 years old , i had to make it 1911 this time ) .
Guess I was feeling paranoid when I signed up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I double-checked my info.
Apparently my name is "Snads Worthy", I'm from Vermouth, Canada, zip code is somewhere in Wyoming, and I was born in 1910 (but since myspace does not allow someone to be over 100 years old, i had to make it 1911 this time).
Guess I was feeling paranoid when I signed up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246</id>
	<title>Deleting does no good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268753040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think deleting your Myspace account will do anything. They already have your data and you already agreed to allow them to redistribute it, just because you delete your account doesn't mean they have to delete your data. Facebook has the same agreement and will get to selling your data to the highest bidder sooner or later.</p><p>It's amazing that people will trade the labours of their mind for mere web hosting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think deleting your Myspace account will do anything .
They already have your data and you already agreed to allow them to redistribute it , just because you delete your account does n't mean they have to delete your data .
Facebook has the same agreement and will get to selling your data to the highest bidder sooner or later.It 's amazing that people will trade the labours of their mind for mere web hosting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think deleting your Myspace account will do anything.
They already have your data and you already agreed to allow them to redistribute it, just because you delete your account doesn't mean they have to delete your data.
Facebook has the same agreement and will get to selling your data to the highest bidder sooner or later.It's amazing that people will trade the labours of their mind for mere web hosting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495172</id>
	<title>What is myspace?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268752800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know that it has been around for some time, but does anyone actually spend any time there? And better yet, does anyone actually save personal information they are afraid of there?

Seems like this shouldn't be to big of a problem. My birthday, address and phone number are easy enough to find elsewhere. If somebody is paying myspace for that information, then good for them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know that it has been around for some time , but does anyone actually spend any time there ?
And better yet , does anyone actually save personal information they are afraid of there ?
Seems like this should n't be to big of a problem .
My birthday , address and phone number are easy enough to find elsewhere .
If somebody is paying myspace for that information , then good for them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know that it has been around for some time, but does anyone actually spend any time there?
And better yet, does anyone actually save personal information they are afraid of there?
Seems like this shouldn't be to big of a problem.
My birthday, address and phone number are easy enough to find elsewhere.
If somebody is paying myspace for that information, then good for them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31498352</id>
	<title>Re:It is the death sigh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268764320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...I went to Microcenter (AMAZING STORE! Better than Newegg!) and bought something. They already had my information and informed me that they bought it from Circuit City</p></div><p>From the Microcenter website:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>[Welcome] Customers of the Former Circuit City!<br>On August 28, 2009, Micro Center acquired the POSTAL mailing list of Circuit City Stores. Micro Center is a nationwide retailer and website of 30,000 technology-related items and exciting product offers. We advertise by direct mail, and would greatly value having you as a customer.<br>This is notice to you that we are amending the Circuit City privacy policy as described in our Privacy Policy If you prefer not to be covered under this Privacy Policy and receive postal mailings from us or our partners, please visit our Preference Center and let us know.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...I went to Microcenter ( AMAZING STORE !
Better than Newegg !
) and bought something .
They already had my information and informed me that they bought it from Circuit CityFrom the Microcenter website : [ Welcome ] Customers of the Former Circuit City ! On August 28 , 2009 , Micro Center acquired the POSTAL mailing list of Circuit City Stores .
Micro Center is a nationwide retailer and website of 30,000 technology-related items and exciting product offers .
We advertise by direct mail , and would greatly value having you as a customer.This is notice to you that we are amending the Circuit City privacy policy as described in our Privacy Policy If you prefer not to be covered under this Privacy Policy and receive postal mailings from us or our partners , please visit our Preference Center and let us know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...I went to Microcenter (AMAZING STORE!
Better than Newegg!
) and bought something.
They already had my information and informed me that they bought it from Circuit CityFrom the Microcenter website:[Welcome] Customers of the Former Circuit City!On August 28, 2009, Micro Center acquired the POSTAL mailing list of Circuit City Stores.
Micro Center is a nationwide retailer and website of 30,000 technology-related items and exciting product offers.
We advertise by direct mail, and would greatly value having you as a customer.This is notice to you that we are amending the Circuit City privacy policy as described in our Privacy Policy If you prefer not to be covered under this Privacy Policy and receive postal mailings from us or our partners, please visit our Preference Center and let us know.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495862</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495964</id>
	<title>Whew!</title>
	<author>TheVelvetFlamebait</author>
	<datestamp>1268755620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's times like this I'm glad I'm with Facebook!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's times like this I 'm glad I 'm with Facebook !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's times like this I'm glad I'm with Facebook!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31498012</id>
	<title>Re:Deleting does no good</title>
	<author>icebraining</author>
	<datestamp>1268763000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I was a kid I had a pen-pal who I've never met face to face. Was it meaningless and useless too? It's pen and paper!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was a kid I had a pen-pal who I 've never met face to face .
Was it meaningless and useless too ?
It 's pen and paper !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was a kid I had a pen-pal who I've never met face to face.
Was it meaningless and useless too?
It's pen and paper!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31498808</id>
	<title>Shocked!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268766060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who would think that a company owned by Rupert Murdoch would do something unethical?<br> <br>

On a serious note, this appears to be the beginning of the end for MySpace (as if that wasn't already apparent).  All Rupert Murdoch has been able to ever see was the dollar right in front of his face.  I guess quality and long term value mean nothing to him.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who would think that a company owned by Rupert Murdoch would do something unethical ?
On a serious note , this appears to be the beginning of the end for MySpace ( as if that was n't already apparent ) .
All Rupert Murdoch has been able to ever see was the dollar right in front of his face .
I guess quality and long term value mean nothing to him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who would think that a company owned by Rupert Murdoch would do something unethical?
On a serious note, this appears to be the beginning of the end for MySpace (as if that wasn't already apparent).
All Rupert Murdoch has been able to ever see was the dollar right in front of his face.
I guess quality and long term value mean nothing to him.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495212</id>
	<title>Typical Murdoch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268752920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since it's owned by News Corporation, it'd be fair to say that it draws from the Murdoch family's deep well of moral squalor.  So selling user data to the highest bidder, in addition to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MySpace#Religious\_discrimination" title="wikipedia.org">attacking Murdoch's ideological enemies</a> [wikipedia.org], is being just true to form for these people.</p><p>I can't say I'm surprised.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since it 's owned by News Corporation , it 'd be fair to say that it draws from the Murdoch family 's deep well of moral squalor .
So selling user data to the highest bidder , in addition to attacking Murdoch 's ideological enemies [ wikipedia.org ] , is being just true to form for these people.I ca n't say I 'm surprised .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since it's owned by News Corporation, it'd be fair to say that it draws from the Murdoch family's deep well of moral squalor.
So selling user data to the highest bidder, in addition to attacking Murdoch's ideological enemies [wikipedia.org], is being just true to form for these people.I can't say I'm surprised.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496060</id>
	<title>Give them data they can't use</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268755980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DON'T PANIC!  <b>Just go and replace your data with nonsensical, bad data.  All's fair in such wars.</b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DO N'T PANIC !
Just go and replace your data with nonsensical , bad data .
All 's fair in such wars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DON'T PANIC!
Just go and replace your data with nonsensical, bad data.
All's fair in such wars.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496104</id>
	<title>????? problem solved</title>
	<author>Plekto</author>
	<datestamp>1268756160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1:Run online social site<br>2:Need to increase income<br>3:?????<br>4:Profit!</p><p>****<br>We just figured out what #3 is - sell user data to data mining company(read: foreign botnet, which is where it eventually does end up).</p><p>Unfortunately this seems to work for almost anything online.  Expect targeted spam to increase tenfold in your email accounts due to this move by them.  Well, that is, if you ever signed up for MySpace.  Expect Facebook to follow in a few months or years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 : Run online social site2 : Need to increase income3 : ? ? ? ? ? 4 : Profit !
* * * * We just figured out what # 3 is - sell user data to data mining company ( read : foreign botnet , which is where it eventually does end up ) .Unfortunately this seems to work for almost anything online .
Expect targeted spam to increase tenfold in your email accounts due to this move by them .
Well , that is , if you ever signed up for MySpace .
Expect Facebook to follow in a few months or years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1:Run online social site2:Need to increase income3:?????4:Profit!
****We just figured out what #3 is - sell user data to data mining company(read: foreign botnet, which is where it eventually does end up).Unfortunately this seems to work for almost anything online.
Expect targeted spam to increase tenfold in your email accounts due to this move by them.
Well, that is, if you ever signed up for MySpace.
Expect Facebook to follow in a few months or years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496268</id>
	<title>MySpace refuses to delete my account</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268756760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As previously noted, deleting one's MySpace account really won't do much, but it's interesting to note that I can't for the life of me convince MySpace to delete my account.  I've tried several times now to go through the deletion process--it finishes off by saying that the process is not complete until I click a link in an email that they will send "shortly."  But I never see the email--I use hotmail for a junk account, and that is the email address linked to my MySpace account, but I never actually get the email, not even in the junk mail folder.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As previously noted , deleting one 's MySpace account really wo n't do much , but it 's interesting to note that I ca n't for the life of me convince MySpace to delete my account .
I 've tried several times now to go through the deletion process--it finishes off by saying that the process is not complete until I click a link in an email that they will send " shortly .
" But I never see the email--I use hotmail for a junk account , and that is the email address linked to my MySpace account , but I never actually get the email , not even in the junk mail folder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As previously noted, deleting one's MySpace account really won't do much, but it's interesting to note that I can't for the life of me convince MySpace to delete my account.
I've tried several times now to go through the deletion process--it finishes off by saying that the process is not complete until I click a link in an email that they will send "shortly.
"  But I never see the email--I use hotmail for a junk account, and that is the email address linked to my MySpace account, but I never actually get the email, not even in the junk mail folder.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495686</id>
	<title>Even better</title>
	<author>Exitar</author>
	<datestamp>1268754660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Create (or use your own if it doesn't contain information you care) and start to mess up with any kind of information you think they will gather.<br>Create music compilations with no sense, change your humor randomly, become friend of people with nothing in common and so on.<br>Be creative!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Create ( or use your own if it does n't contain information you care ) and start to mess up with any kind of information you think they will gather.Create music compilations with no sense , change your humor randomly , become friend of people with nothing in common and so on.Be creative !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Create (or use your own if it doesn't contain information you care) and start to mess up with any kind of information you think they will gather.Create music compilations with no sense, change your humor randomly, become friend of people with nothing in common and so on.Be creative!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496930</id>
	<title>Re:I Still Use It...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268759040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Where will I go?</p></div><p>Outside?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where will I go ? Outside ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where will I go?Outside?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495472</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495662</id>
	<title>Cancelled</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268754600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Scoundrels.</p><p>MySpace account now cancelled. I first edited my privacy settings to be the most restrictive possible, then closed the account. This was the reason I gave:</p><p>"<i>Cancelling due to MySpace selling user info to companies that may use it for marketing. Please ensure that none of my info, either current or historical, is supplied under any circumstances to any third-party individual, group or other entity either commercial or non-commercial. Thank you.</i>"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Scoundrels.MySpace account now cancelled .
I first edited my privacy settings to be the most restrictive possible , then closed the account .
This was the reason I gave : " Cancelling due to MySpace selling user info to companies that may use it for marketing .
Please ensure that none of my info , either current or historical , is supplied under any circumstances to any third-party individual , group or other entity either commercial or non-commercial .
Thank you .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scoundrels.MySpace account now cancelled.
I first edited my privacy settings to be the most restrictive possible, then closed the account.
This was the reason I gave:"Cancelling due to MySpace selling user info to companies that may use it for marketing.
Please ensure that none of my info, either current or historical, is supplied under any circumstances to any third-party individual, group or other entity either commercial or non-commercial.
Thank you.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497888</id>
	<title>Legal?</title>
	<author>wisnoskij</author>
	<datestamp>1268762460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is that legal, they must of promised user some sort of data privacy when they created their account?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that legal , they must of promised user some sort of data privacy when they created their account ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that legal, they must of promised user some sort of data privacy when they created their account?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497492</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>randombilly</author>
	<datestamp>1268761020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't particularly care if the world at large knows that Im "Headed to the Gym" or that Im 31 years old.. My 'private' information is harmless.. Sure you can see that I like to play kickball or that I recently took a cruise and had an awesome time.. I dont see how its dangerous for a company to sell my status updates or my interest in apple computers.   Its not like Im tweeting my bank account number, or posting my passwords to my embarrassing adult dating site profile on my "wall"... Let them see and sell my info.. WHO CARES?
You want to talk about damning personal info, open a yellow pages phone book... there are directions to your front door right in there.. heh.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't particularly care if the world at large knows that Im " Headed to the Gym " or that Im 31 years old.. My 'private ' information is harmless.. Sure you can see that I like to play kickball or that I recently took a cruise and had an awesome time.. I dont see how its dangerous for a company to sell my status updates or my interest in apple computers .
Its not like Im tweeting my bank account number , or posting my passwords to my embarrassing adult dating site profile on my " wall " ... Let them see and sell my info.. WHO CARES ?
You want to talk about damning personal info , open a yellow pages phone book... there are directions to your front door right in there.. heh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't particularly care if the world at large knows that Im "Headed to the Gym" or that Im 31 years old.. My 'private' information is harmless.. Sure you can see that I like to play kickball or that I recently took a cruise and had an awesome time.. I dont see how its dangerous for a company to sell my status updates or my interest in apple computers.
Its not like Im tweeting my bank account number, or posting my passwords to my embarrassing adult dating site profile on my "wall"... Let them see and sell my info.. WHO CARES?
You want to talk about damning personal info, open a yellow pages phone book... there are directions to your front door right in there.. heh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496248</id>
	<title>Re:So you think its really that easy?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1268756700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No. Removing your profile is really easy. Just edit it into a troll profile. Replace all images with the pain series, 50 hitlers / swastikas, etc. Edit all texts to the most offensive ones possible. And don&rsquo;t forget to put a &ldquo;song&rdquo; &ldquo;owned&rdquo; by the biggest douche out there on your site. Something by Warner Music or the like.</p><p>Will get you deleted in less than an hour. Guaranteed. ^^</p><p>But don&rsquo;t forget to &ldquo;unfriend&rdquo; all your friends before you do so!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
Removing your profile is really easy .
Just edit it into a troll profile .
Replace all images with the pain series , 50 hitlers / swastikas , etc .
Edit all texts to the most offensive ones possible .
And don    t forget to put a    song       owned    by the biggest douche out there on your site .
Something by Warner Music or the like.Will get you deleted in less than an hour .
Guaranteed. ^ ^ But don    t forget to    unfriend    all your friends before you do so !
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
Removing your profile is really easy.
Just edit it into a troll profile.
Replace all images with the pain series, 50 hitlers / swastikas, etc.
Edit all texts to the most offensive ones possible.
And don’t forget to put a “song” “owned” by the biggest douche out there on your site.
Something by Warner Music or the like.Will get you deleted in less than an hour.
Guaranteed. ^^But don’t forget to “unfriend” all your friends before you do so!
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31505284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31501704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31499502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31498012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31500372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31499766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496362
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496726
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31498352
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495922
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31500984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31498078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31505018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495922
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31502894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31499414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31499816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31500428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31500440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497736
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31498750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496976
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497532
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31502954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495864
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495922
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31508112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496260
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496154
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31501642
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495922
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31501990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_16_1317228_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31499664
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1317228.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495246
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495446
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495754
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497460
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31498012
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497444
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31499414
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496620
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496788
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31500440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31499766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495992
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495484
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496292
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1317228.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495710
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1317228.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495472
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495820
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496930
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1317228.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31499664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495850
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1317228.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495228
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1317228.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496124
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1317228.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495662
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1317228.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495604
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31500372
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31499502
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1317228.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496068
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1317228.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495170
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495778
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496726
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495326
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495620
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496422
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31502894
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495584
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31501704
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496248
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31498078
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496552
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31500428
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496994
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496170
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497232
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495402
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496154
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495922
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496348
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496480
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31508112
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31501990
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31500984
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496066
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497156
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497532
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31505284
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31502954
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495864
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496030
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496712
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31505018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497070
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31499816
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1317228.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496362
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31498750
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495688
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1317228.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496546
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1317228.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495212
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31497932
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31501642
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1317228.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496260
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1317228.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495140
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31496240
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1317228.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495176
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1317228.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31498352
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_16_1317228.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_16_1317228.31495920
</commentlist>
</conversation>
