<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_11_1917218</id>
	<title>Bill To Ban All Salt In Restaurant Cooking</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1268335320000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>lord\_rotorooter writes <i>"Felix Ortiz, D-Brooklyn, introduced a bill that would ruin restaurant food and baked goods as we know them.  The measure (if passed) <a href="http://blog.timesunion.com/tablehopping/13889/assemblyman-seeking-to-ban-all-salt-in-restaurant-cooking/">would ban the use of all forms of salt in the preparation and cooking of food</a> for all restaurants or bakeries.  While the use of too much salt can contribute to health problems, the complete banning of salt would have negative impacts on food chemistry. Not only does salt enhance flavor, it controls bacteria, slows yeast activity and strengthens dough by tightening gluten.  Salt also inhibits the growth of microbes that spoil cheese."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>lord \ _rotorooter writes " Felix Ortiz , D-Brooklyn , introduced a bill that would ruin restaurant food and baked goods as we know them .
The measure ( if passed ) would ban the use of all forms of salt in the preparation and cooking of food for all restaurants or bakeries .
While the use of too much salt can contribute to health problems , the complete banning of salt would have negative impacts on food chemistry .
Not only does salt enhance flavor , it controls bacteria , slows yeast activity and strengthens dough by tightening gluten .
Salt also inhibits the growth of microbes that spoil cheese .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lord\_rotorooter writes "Felix Ortiz, D-Brooklyn, introduced a bill that would ruin restaurant food and baked goods as we know them.
The measure (if passed) would ban the use of all forms of salt in the preparation and cooking of food for all restaurants or bakeries.
While the use of too much salt can contribute to health problems, the complete banning of salt would have negative impacts on food chemistry.
Not only does salt enhance flavor, it controls bacteria, slows yeast activity and strengthens dough by tightening gluten.
Salt also inhibits the growth of microbes that spoil cheese.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442454</id>
	<title>Salt???</title>
	<author>quantumpineal</author>
	<datestamp>1268339940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nyoh! I love salt!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nyoh !
I love salt !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nyoh!
I love salt!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444146</id>
	<title>Re:This just in!</title>
	<author>jedidiah</author>
	<datestamp>1268301600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Total culinary clue-lessness and dietary problems tend to go hand in hand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Total culinary clue-lessness and dietary problems tend to go hand in hand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Total culinary clue-lessness and dietary problems tend to go hand in hand.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31451966</id>
	<title>Re:Some people are idiots</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1268410980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why is banning the solution to everything?</p></div><p>Actually, that&rsquo;s great idea. Ban the solution to everything!</p><p>Erm... ban the government forcing us to accept their solution to everything, I mean.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is banning the solution to everything ? Actually , that    s great idea .
Ban the solution to everything ! Erm... ban the government forcing us to accept their solution to everything , I mean .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is banning the solution to everything?Actually, that’s great idea.
Ban the solution to everything!Erm... ban the government forcing us to accept their solution to everything, I mean.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446390</id>
	<title>Maybe some *thinking* needs to be done</title>
	<author>slew</author>
	<datestamp>1268310420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Perhaps there needs to be some law to require *LARGE* restaurants...</p></div></blockquote><p>Although *LARGE* restaurants probably have more resources than small restaurants to do partake in a social engineering experiment, this always seems to be the standard "progressive" argument, from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.  Oh wait, where did I hear that line before, it wasn't progressive, but....</p><p>If it's a good idea, shouldn't it be applied across the board?  If that's not feasible, there should be a good reason or some equivalent that has the same principle.  Maybe make the small restaurants stamp a disclaimer label on their menus:</p><p> <b>WARNING: this menu does NOT contain the government mandated number of low-sodium dining options.</b></p><p>Well, isn't that fair?  And if putting in a disclaimer is good enough for the small restaurant, why isn't that good enough for the large restaurants?  You should ask yourself why some enterprising person hasn't been successful creating a chain of low-sodium (or regular-sodium) restaurants if there is a market for them for all the people that eat out alot like you do and are concerned about this.</p><p>As an alternate approach, perhaps why not just start with a pilot program with government run cafeterias (say capitol hill, public schools, prisons etc) to see what works and what doesn't work (yeah, I think I know why not, but it's a fair argument so humor me). I doubt many government owned or run cafeteria programs would be able to pull this off easily and they have the entire resources of the government behind them, but maybe it could be like the military/school "color-integration" program of past decade if done properly.</p><p>Historically, it's very populist to attempt social engineering on the *LARGE* guys by passing laws that attempt something and exempt the government agencies from the same requirements in the same breath.  The *LARGE* guys lobby and either are successful at killing it or watering it down with FUD.  However, if it turns out to be a really a good idea and there's an example that the government to point to, you know that the *LARGE* guys would be all over it in a heartbeat, so why not try that approach?</p><p>The standard answer it's easier for lawmakers to kibitz and pander than to actually properly define and solve a problem.  If an smoking-ban bill and an trans-fat-ban bill made some politician popular, just think what an salt-bill bill will do to my career.  Maybe we should just stick-it to restaurants instead of the whole population for now to get more populist support.  All form, no substance.</p><p>Sadly, lately we (as a public) eat this all form, not substance approach up because we aren't taught or (at least don't exercise) critical thinking skills.  It's like we've regressed as a society to a more primitive state of comfortable group-think led by cheerleaders tugging emotional heartstrings.  Sigh...</p><p>At least this salt-ban bill isn't going anywhere in it's current form...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps there needs to be some law to require * LARGE * restaurants...Although * LARGE * restaurants probably have more resources than small restaurants to do partake in a social engineering experiment , this always seems to be the standard " progressive " argument , from each according to his ability , to each according to his needs .
Oh wait , where did I hear that line before , it was n't progressive , but....If it 's a good idea , should n't it be applied across the board ?
If that 's not feasible , there should be a good reason or some equivalent that has the same principle .
Maybe make the small restaurants stamp a disclaimer label on their menus : WARNING : this menu does NOT contain the government mandated number of low-sodium dining options.Well , is n't that fair ?
And if putting in a disclaimer is good enough for the small restaurant , why is n't that good enough for the large restaurants ?
You should ask yourself why some enterprising person has n't been successful creating a chain of low-sodium ( or regular-sodium ) restaurants if there is a market for them for all the people that eat out alot like you do and are concerned about this.As an alternate approach , perhaps why not just start with a pilot program with government run cafeterias ( say capitol hill , public schools , prisons etc ) to see what works and what does n't work ( yeah , I think I know why not , but it 's a fair argument so humor me ) .
I doubt many government owned or run cafeteria programs would be able to pull this off easily and they have the entire resources of the government behind them , but maybe it could be like the military/school " color-integration " program of past decade if done properly.Historically , it 's very populist to attempt social engineering on the * LARGE * guys by passing laws that attempt something and exempt the government agencies from the same requirements in the same breath .
The * LARGE * guys lobby and either are successful at killing it or watering it down with FUD .
However , if it turns out to be a really a good idea and there 's an example that the government to point to , you know that the * LARGE * guys would be all over it in a heartbeat , so why not try that approach ? The standard answer it 's easier for lawmakers to kibitz and pander than to actually properly define and solve a problem .
If an smoking-ban bill and an trans-fat-ban bill made some politician popular , just think what an salt-bill bill will do to my career .
Maybe we should just stick-it to restaurants instead of the whole population for now to get more populist support .
All form , no substance.Sadly , lately we ( as a public ) eat this all form , not substance approach up because we are n't taught or ( at least do n't exercise ) critical thinking skills .
It 's like we 've regressed as a society to a more primitive state of comfortable group-think led by cheerleaders tugging emotional heartstrings .
Sigh...At least this salt-ban bill is n't going anywhere in it 's current form.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps there needs to be some law to require *LARGE* restaurants...Although *LARGE* restaurants probably have more resources than small restaurants to do partake in a social engineering experiment, this always seems to be the standard "progressive" argument, from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.
Oh wait, where did I hear that line before, it wasn't progressive, but....If it's a good idea, shouldn't it be applied across the board?
If that's not feasible, there should be a good reason or some equivalent that has the same principle.
Maybe make the small restaurants stamp a disclaimer label on their menus: WARNING: this menu does NOT contain the government mandated number of low-sodium dining options.Well, isn't that fair?
And if putting in a disclaimer is good enough for the small restaurant, why isn't that good enough for the large restaurants?
You should ask yourself why some enterprising person hasn't been successful creating a chain of low-sodium (or regular-sodium) restaurants if there is a market for them for all the people that eat out alot like you do and are concerned about this.As an alternate approach, perhaps why not just start with a pilot program with government run cafeterias (say capitol hill, public schools, prisons etc) to see what works and what doesn't work (yeah, I think I know why not, but it's a fair argument so humor me).
I doubt many government owned or run cafeteria programs would be able to pull this off easily and they have the entire resources of the government behind them, but maybe it could be like the military/school "color-integration" program of past decade if done properly.Historically, it's very populist to attempt social engineering on the *LARGE* guys by passing laws that attempt something and exempt the government agencies from the same requirements in the same breath.
The *LARGE* guys lobby and either are successful at killing it or watering it down with FUD.
However, if it turns out to be a really a good idea and there's an example that the government to point to, you know that the *LARGE* guys would be all over it in a heartbeat, so why not try that approach?The standard answer it's easier for lawmakers to kibitz and pander than to actually properly define and solve a problem.
If an smoking-ban bill and an trans-fat-ban bill made some politician popular, just think what an salt-bill bill will do to my career.
Maybe we should just stick-it to restaurants instead of the whole population for now to get more populist support.
All form, no substance.Sadly, lately we (as a public) eat this all form, not substance approach up because we aren't taught or (at least don't exercise) critical thinking skills.
It's like we've regressed as a society to a more primitive state of comfortable group-think led by cheerleaders tugging emotional heartstrings.
Sigh...At least this salt-ban bill isn't going anywhere in it's current form...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444490</id>
	<title>Long since proved why</title>
	<author>Exception Duck</author>
	<datestamp>1268302680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Although this is overdoing it allot I think the state of many americans are long overdue for some nanny state control.  When other parts of the world are dying of hunger, americans are dying of fat.</p><p>But I'll agree this is just silly.</p><p>And I wonder what this means.<br>from the article: "each individual addition of salt"<br>is that 1 salt molecule  ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Although this is overdoing it allot I think the state of many americans are long overdue for some nanny state control .
When other parts of the world are dying of hunger , americans are dying of fat.But I 'll agree this is just silly.And I wonder what this means.from the article : " each individual addition of salt " is that 1 salt molecule ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although this is overdoing it allot I think the state of many americans are long overdue for some nanny state control.
When other parts of the world are dying of hunger, americans are dying of fat.But I'll agree this is just silly.And I wonder what this means.from the article: "each individual addition of salt"is that 1 salt molecule  ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31452410</id>
	<title>Re:Salt really isn't all that bad...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268413200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem isn't politicians: it's epidemiologists and other medical researchers who are basically bad scientists.</p><p>The logic for salt-avoidance goes something like this: eating salt tends to raise your blood pressure, hence eating less salt will lower your blood pressure.  This is known in logic as the "fallacy of denying the hypothesis".</p><p>Actual studies have been made where people are asked to reduce their salt consumption, and guess what?  Their blood pressure doesn't fall!  Their mortality doesn't decrease.</p><p>If only voters stopped listening to bad researchers, then politicians wouldn't put forth stupid policies.</p><p>Alejo</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is n't politicians : it 's epidemiologists and other medical researchers who are basically bad scientists.The logic for salt-avoidance goes something like this : eating salt tends to raise your blood pressure , hence eating less salt will lower your blood pressure .
This is known in logic as the " fallacy of denying the hypothesis " .Actual studies have been made where people are asked to reduce their salt consumption , and guess what ?
Their blood pressure does n't fall !
Their mortality does n't decrease.If only voters stopped listening to bad researchers , then politicians would n't put forth stupid policies.Alejo</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem isn't politicians: it's epidemiologists and other medical researchers who are basically bad scientists.The logic for salt-avoidance goes something like this: eating salt tends to raise your blood pressure, hence eating less salt will lower your blood pressure.
This is known in logic as the "fallacy of denying the hypothesis".Actual studies have been made where people are asked to reduce their salt consumption, and guess what?
Their blood pressure doesn't fall!
Their mortality doesn't decrease.If only voters stopped listening to bad researchers, then politicians wouldn't put forth stupid policies.Alejo</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442464</id>
	<title>Re:ummmmm.....</title>
	<author>Like2Byte</author>
	<datestamp>1268340000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"I think salt should be banned in restaurants. I ask if a dish has salt in it, and if I does, I get something else that doesn't have salt,"</p><p>Correct me if I'm wrong but a large number of the chemicals that make up food are salts of one type or another. What exactly does he eat?</p></div></blockquote><p>Come November? Crow.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I think salt should be banned in restaurants .
I ask if a dish has salt in it , and if I does , I get something else that does n't have salt , " Correct me if I 'm wrong but a large number of the chemicals that make up food are salts of one type or another .
What exactly does he eat ? Come November ?
Crow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I think salt should be banned in restaurants.
I ask if a dish has salt in it, and if I does, I get something else that doesn't have salt,"Correct me if I'm wrong but a large number of the chemicals that make up food are salts of one type or another.
What exactly does he eat?Come November?
Crow.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444866</id>
	<title>Re:Inevitable.</title>
	<author>AndersOSU</author>
	<datestamp>1268303940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>People need to understand what they're consuming</p></div></blockquote><p>How do you ensure that people know what they're consuming?  Government mandated labeling requirements.</p><p>You're not going to find me defending this stupid salt ban, but look, we are a nation of fatties, and when an uninsured 300 lb walmart employee gets rushed to the hospital in cardiac arrest and needs a quadruple bypass at age 37, who do you think pays for that?  Perhaps it's worth looking at why processed food is so much cheaper than healthy foods and considering ways to rectify the situation.  I don't think the answer is a ban either, but I do think the answer is in government, specifically public health targeted taxes, like on cigarettes.  But when it comes down to it, if you're going to tax pork rinds at a level that affects behavior, you've probably just banned them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>People need to understand what they 're consumingHow do you ensure that people know what they 're consuming ?
Government mandated labeling requirements.You 're not going to find me defending this stupid salt ban , but look , we are a nation of fatties , and when an uninsured 300 lb walmart employee gets rushed to the hospital in cardiac arrest and needs a quadruple bypass at age 37 , who do you think pays for that ?
Perhaps it 's worth looking at why processed food is so much cheaper than healthy foods and considering ways to rectify the situation .
I do n't think the answer is a ban either , but I do think the answer is in government , specifically public health targeted taxes , like on cigarettes .
But when it comes down to it , if you 're going to tax pork rinds at a level that affects behavior , you 've probably just banned them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People need to understand what they're consumingHow do you ensure that people know what they're consuming?
Government mandated labeling requirements.You're not going to find me defending this stupid salt ban, but look, we are a nation of fatties, and when an uninsured 300 lb walmart employee gets rushed to the hospital in cardiac arrest and needs a quadruple bypass at age 37, who do you think pays for that?
Perhaps it's worth looking at why processed food is so much cheaper than healthy foods and considering ways to rectify the situation.
I don't think the answer is a ban either, but I do think the answer is in government, specifically public health targeted taxes, like on cigarettes.
But when it comes down to it, if you're going to tax pork rinds at a level that affects behavior, you've probably just banned them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447990</id>
	<title>Re:So what else is new</title>
	<author>dvnelson72</author>
	<datestamp>1268321100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't you see that the so called <i>smart people</i> are the ones coming up with things like this?  It's because they <i>know</i> that they know more than the masses and they are just trying to protect their constituents from themselves.  Nevermind that they may not actually know more.  The key is that they think they do.</p><p>When people say the word elitist in the context of politics, I find they mean either (a) people who study but never actually do anything or (b) people who think they know more than everyone else and therefore should be able to tell us all what to do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't you see that the so called smart people are the ones coming up with things like this ?
It 's because they know that they know more than the masses and they are just trying to protect their constituents from themselves .
Nevermind that they may not actually know more .
The key is that they think they do.When people say the word elitist in the context of politics , I find they mean either ( a ) people who study but never actually do anything or ( b ) people who think they know more than everyone else and therefore should be able to tell us all what to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't you see that the so called smart people are the ones coming up with things like this?
It's because they know that they know more than the masses and they are just trying to protect their constituents from themselves.
Nevermind that they may not actually know more.
The key is that they think they do.When people say the word elitist in the context of politics, I find they mean either (a) people who study but never actually do anything or (b) people who think they know more than everyone else and therefore should be able to tell us all what to do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443146</id>
	<title>Re:Go go Nanny State...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268298720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ROFL - go go Poe's Law<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ROFL - go go Poe 's Law : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ROFL - go go Poe's Law :D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442460</id>
	<title>Well, yet again I'm wrong</title>
	<author>nedlohs</author>
	<datestamp>1268339940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I spoke much to soon with: <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1571786&amp;cid=31365008" title="slashdot.org">http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1571786&amp;cid=31365008</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I spoke much to soon with : http : //yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1571786&amp;cid = 31365008 [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I spoke much to soon with: http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1571786&amp;cid=31365008 [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443474</id>
	<title>invisible hand of stupidity</title>
	<author>benjamindees</author>
	<datestamp>1268299560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Okay, salt is horrible for you.  And it's overused almost everywhere, in canned foods, poultry, every type of fast food, most chain restaurants, baked goods, etc...</p><p>BUT..  outlawing it is just stupid.  It's nice to be able to go to a restaurant every once in a while and get a meal that's actually well-prepared and tastes good.  And that requires some salt, at least.  This is a luxury good.  And restaurants that provide this luxury can rightly charge higher prices for it.</p><p>Unfortunately, this means that those restaurants tend to dominate the market.  The problem occurs when this becomes the food that average people eat every day, fast food, prepared foods at home and at chain restaurants, rather than the random meal eaten at an authentic restaurant.  Americans don't prepare their own meals nearly as much any more, and when they do, they aren't as picky as they should be about it's contents.</p><p>And why is this?  Well, we are busy.  Americans over-work.  When the economy is doing well or when our skills are in demand, we work 12 hr days and don't have time for anything but fast food.  When the economy is doing poorly, we are still dependent upon prepared foods because most of us haven't developed the skills to prepare food from scratch.  And, more importantly, the infrastructure isn't there to support fresh foods at your local grocery store.  Fresh food is more expensive, and unemployed people don't prefer expensive foods over inexpensive ones.  The market demands food that is fast and cheap, not healthy.</p><p>Okay, and why is that the case?  Western capitalism requires you to work in order to survive.  Specialization and corporatism favor those who work longer hours over those who work fewer.  People are cheap, subsidized even.  The cost of reproduction is minimal.  Health is an afterthought, a political issue rather than a personal responsibility.</p><p>And, importantly, this system is maintained by force.  It's not inherently sustainable.  When it fails, it is bailed out by government fiat, perpetuating the cycle of boom and bust that creates such horrible dietary habits, and reliance on prepared and fast foods, in the first place.  Interest rates are held artificially low (0.75\% right now), giving the signal to out-of-work Americans that they shouldn't bother investing in any type of reasonable, sustainable infrastructure for healthy food preparation because they will be back to working 12 hour days soon (when the next bubble is inflated) and relying on more unhealthy salt-laden fast food.</p><p>So, once again, the proposed solution for government force and interference is more government force and interference, rather than eliminating the source (lousy government) that caused the problem in the first place.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay , salt is horrible for you .
And it 's overused almost everywhere , in canned foods , poultry , every type of fast food , most chain restaurants , baked goods , etc...BUT.. outlawing it is just stupid .
It 's nice to be able to go to a restaurant every once in a while and get a meal that 's actually well-prepared and tastes good .
And that requires some salt , at least .
This is a luxury good .
And restaurants that provide this luxury can rightly charge higher prices for it.Unfortunately , this means that those restaurants tend to dominate the market .
The problem occurs when this becomes the food that average people eat every day , fast food , prepared foods at home and at chain restaurants , rather than the random meal eaten at an authentic restaurant .
Americans do n't prepare their own meals nearly as much any more , and when they do , they are n't as picky as they should be about it 's contents.And why is this ?
Well , we are busy .
Americans over-work .
When the economy is doing well or when our skills are in demand , we work 12 hr days and do n't have time for anything but fast food .
When the economy is doing poorly , we are still dependent upon prepared foods because most of us have n't developed the skills to prepare food from scratch .
And , more importantly , the infrastructure is n't there to support fresh foods at your local grocery store .
Fresh food is more expensive , and unemployed people do n't prefer expensive foods over inexpensive ones .
The market demands food that is fast and cheap , not healthy.Okay , and why is that the case ?
Western capitalism requires you to work in order to survive .
Specialization and corporatism favor those who work longer hours over those who work fewer .
People are cheap , subsidized even .
The cost of reproduction is minimal .
Health is an afterthought , a political issue rather than a personal responsibility.And , importantly , this system is maintained by force .
It 's not inherently sustainable .
When it fails , it is bailed out by government fiat , perpetuating the cycle of boom and bust that creates such horrible dietary habits , and reliance on prepared and fast foods , in the first place .
Interest rates are held artificially low ( 0.75 \ % right now ) , giving the signal to out-of-work Americans that they should n't bother investing in any type of reasonable , sustainable infrastructure for healthy food preparation because they will be back to working 12 hour days soon ( when the next bubble is inflated ) and relying on more unhealthy salt-laden fast food.So , once again , the proposed solution for government force and interference is more government force and interference , rather than eliminating the source ( lousy government ) that caused the problem in the first place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay, salt is horrible for you.
And it's overused almost everywhere, in canned foods, poultry, every type of fast food, most chain restaurants, baked goods, etc...BUT..  outlawing it is just stupid.
It's nice to be able to go to a restaurant every once in a while and get a meal that's actually well-prepared and tastes good.
And that requires some salt, at least.
This is a luxury good.
And restaurants that provide this luxury can rightly charge higher prices for it.Unfortunately, this means that those restaurants tend to dominate the market.
The problem occurs when this becomes the food that average people eat every day, fast food, prepared foods at home and at chain restaurants, rather than the random meal eaten at an authentic restaurant.
Americans don't prepare their own meals nearly as much any more, and when they do, they aren't as picky as they should be about it's contents.And why is this?
Well, we are busy.
Americans over-work.
When the economy is doing well or when our skills are in demand, we work 12 hr days and don't have time for anything but fast food.
When the economy is doing poorly, we are still dependent upon prepared foods because most of us haven't developed the skills to prepare food from scratch.
And, more importantly, the infrastructure isn't there to support fresh foods at your local grocery store.
Fresh food is more expensive, and unemployed people don't prefer expensive foods over inexpensive ones.
The market demands food that is fast and cheap, not healthy.Okay, and why is that the case?
Western capitalism requires you to work in order to survive.
Specialization and corporatism favor those who work longer hours over those who work fewer.
People are cheap, subsidized even.
The cost of reproduction is minimal.
Health is an afterthought, a political issue rather than a personal responsibility.And, importantly, this system is maintained by force.
It's not inherently sustainable.
When it fails, it is bailed out by government fiat, perpetuating the cycle of boom and bust that creates such horrible dietary habits, and reliance on prepared and fast foods, in the first place.
Interest rates are held artificially low (0.75\% right now), giving the signal to out-of-work Americans that they shouldn't bother investing in any type of reasonable, sustainable infrastructure for healthy food preparation because they will be back to working 12 hour days soon (when the next bubble is inflated) and relying on more unhealthy salt-laden fast food.So, once again, the proposed solution for government force and interference is more government force and interference, rather than eliminating the source (lousy government) that caused the problem in the first place.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442550</id>
	<title>Too much salt?</title>
	<author>CranberryKing</author>
	<datestamp>1268340300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Those problems are related to the fact that no one uses REAL salt anymore. That stuff that Mortons sells is an awful chemical that destroys your arteries. REAL sea salt is GOOD for you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those problems are related to the fact that no one uses REAL salt anymore .
That stuff that Mortons sells is an awful chemical that destroys your arteries .
REAL sea salt is GOOD for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those problems are related to the fact that no one uses REAL salt anymore.
That stuff that Mortons sells is an awful chemical that destroys your arteries.
REAL sea salt is GOOD for you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448666</id>
	<title>Re:They should involve the NRA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268329140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ouch! That stings!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ouch !
That stings !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ouch!
That stings!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446934</id>
	<title>Re:Some people are idiots</title>
	<author>Totenglocke</author>
	<datestamp>1268313240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why is banning the solution to everything? I don't get it. People love to ban anything with legislation, it's completely illogical.</p></div><p>I suggest we ban legislation entirely - problem solved!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is banning the solution to everything ?
I do n't get it .
People love to ban anything with legislation , it 's completely illogical.I suggest we ban legislation entirely - problem solved !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is banning the solution to everything?
I don't get it.
People love to ban anything with legislation, it's completely illogical.I suggest we ban legislation entirely - problem solved!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443872</id>
	<title>Re:Nails are dangerous too...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268300760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I got sunburned once. I think we should ban the Sun before this tragedy happens to another child.</p><p>Think of the children! Ban nails and Sun!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I got sunburned once .
I think we should ban the Sun before this tragedy happens to another child.Think of the children !
Ban nails and Sun !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got sunburned once.
I think we should ban the Sun before this tragedy happens to another child.Think of the children!
Ban nails and Sun!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442416</id>
	<title>All Forms of Salt</title>
	<author>LikwidCirkel</author>
	<datestamp>1268339880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"All forms of salt" would suggest this includes products like table potassium chloride, which is sold as an alternative to common table salt.

That's like banning Coke because of the sugar, and also banning diet coke because it resembles coke.

Oh.. Wait.. this is already the case with commercial help crops.  No stupid proposed laws surprise me any more.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" All forms of salt " would suggest this includes products like table potassium chloride , which is sold as an alternative to common table salt .
That 's like banning Coke because of the sugar , and also banning diet coke because it resembles coke .
Oh.. Wait.. this is already the case with commercial help crops .
No stupid proposed laws surprise me any more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"All forms of salt" would suggest this includes products like table potassium chloride, which is sold as an alternative to common table salt.
That's like banning Coke because of the sugar, and also banning diet coke because it resembles coke.
Oh.. Wait.. this is already the case with commercial help crops.
No stupid proposed laws surprise me any more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446958</id>
	<title>Re:Some people are idiots</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268313360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>not to mention that it will cause even more health problems<br>sodium defencincies?<br>hyperthyroidism?<br>extremely bland food?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>not to mention that it will cause even more health problemssodium defencincies ? hyperthyroidism ? extremely bland food ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not to mention that it will cause even more health problemssodium defencincies?hyperthyroidism?extremely bland food?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442926</id>
	<title>Re:Go go Nanny State...</title>
	<author>je ne sais quoi</author>
	<datestamp>1268298060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Take your knee-jerk libertarian craziness elsewhere you kook...  I for one thank god that we have a government who views its job as to protect us the citizens from the people who would poison us to make a quick buck and I hope they do more to reign in corporate profits over public health.  The bottom line is that private industry would happily poison us the public if they were allowed to.  Why should the government dictate what can be served in food?  Why not lead? It makes it taste sweeter and humans are programmed to enjoy sweet things.  There'd be a slick marketing campaign and the food would look it was cooked with real sweeteners but advertise that all important fact that it had "no calories".    While this might be considered an extreme, Just look at McDonald's who actually refer to their customers as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super\_Size\_Me#Criticism\_and\_statistical\_notes" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">users</a> [wikipedia.org].  Is it a coincidence that the same term is applied to drug addicts? No it isn't, McDonald's aim is to make a profit, not serve healthy food, who cares if the general populace is obese, diabetic and suffering from liver failure, they don't run the health care business.<br> <br>Libertarians like you are competing with PETA for the grand prize in crazy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Take your knee-jerk libertarian craziness elsewhere you kook... I for one thank god that we have a government who views its job as to protect us the citizens from the people who would poison us to make a quick buck and I hope they do more to reign in corporate profits over public health .
The bottom line is that private industry would happily poison us the public if they were allowed to .
Why should the government dictate what can be served in food ?
Why not lead ?
It makes it taste sweeter and humans are programmed to enjoy sweet things .
There 'd be a slick marketing campaign and the food would look it was cooked with real sweeteners but advertise that all important fact that it had " no calories " .
While this might be considered an extreme , Just look at McDonald 's who actually refer to their customers as users [ wikipedia.org ] .
Is it a coincidence that the same term is applied to drug addicts ?
No it is n't , McDonald 's aim is to make a profit , not serve healthy food , who cares if the general populace is obese , diabetic and suffering from liver failure , they do n't run the health care business .
Libertarians like you are competing with PETA for the grand prize in crazy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Take your knee-jerk libertarian craziness elsewhere you kook...  I for one thank god that we have a government who views its job as to protect us the citizens from the people who would poison us to make a quick buck and I hope they do more to reign in corporate profits over public health.
The bottom line is that private industry would happily poison us the public if they were allowed to.
Why should the government dictate what can be served in food?
Why not lead?
It makes it taste sweeter and humans are programmed to enjoy sweet things.
There'd be a slick marketing campaign and the food would look it was cooked with real sweeteners but advertise that all important fact that it had "no calories".
While this might be considered an extreme, Just look at McDonald's who actually refer to their customers as users [wikipedia.org].
Is it a coincidence that the same term is applied to drug addicts?
No it isn't, McDonald's aim is to make a profit, not serve healthy food, who cares if the general populace is obese, diabetic and suffering from liver failure, they don't run the health care business.
Libertarians like you are competing with PETA for the grand prize in crazy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442230</id>
	<title>ummmmm.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268339400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&ldquo;I think salt should be banned in restaurants. I ask if a dish has salt in it, and if I does, I get something else that doesn&rsquo;t have salt,&rdquo;
</p><p>
Correct me if I'm wrong but a large number of the chemicals that make up food are salts of one type or another. What exactly does he eat?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>   I think salt should be banned in restaurants .
I ask if a dish has salt in it , and if I does , I get something else that doesn    t have salt ,    Correct me if I 'm wrong but a large number of the chemicals that make up food are salts of one type or another .
What exactly does he eat ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>“I think salt should be banned in restaurants.
I ask if a dish has salt in it, and if I does, I get something else that doesn’t have salt,”

Correct me if I'm wrong but a large number of the chemicals that make up food are salts of one type or another.
What exactly does he eat?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31450230</id>
	<title>Re:Some people are idiots</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268399700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why aren't you thanking them?</p></div><p>because i haven't gotten my warhammer with the words "Thank You" engraved on it back from the dwarven weaponsmiths yet.</p><p>seriously, in the interest of extending EVERYONE'S health and happiness, why don't we just ban politicians?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why are n't you thanking them ? because i have n't gotten my warhammer with the words " Thank You " engraved on it back from the dwarven weaponsmiths yet.seriously , in the interest of extending EVERYONE 'S health and happiness , why do n't we just ban politicians ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why aren't you thanking them?because i haven't gotten my warhammer with the words "Thank You" engraved on it back from the dwarven weaponsmiths yet.seriously, in the interest of extending EVERYONE'S health and happiness, why don't we just ban politicians?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446150</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31452840</id>
	<title>Re:An alternative:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268415240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great idea, but there goes the secret ballot!  Otherwise, how can we detect the morons who elected the fucking moron?  As Borges said "democracy is an abuse of statistics."</p><p>Alejo</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great idea , but there goes the secret ballot !
Otherwise , how can we detect the morons who elected the fucking moron ?
As Borges said " democracy is an abuse of statistics .
" Alejo</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great idea, but there goes the secret ballot!
Otherwise, how can we detect the morons who elected the fucking moron?
As Borges said "democracy is an abuse of statistics.
"Alejo</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443544</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443882</id>
	<title>I don't support the bill</title>
	<author>rocket97</author>
	<datestamp>1268300820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't support the bill, but I do think that restaurant food has way too much salt in it.  I recently went on a diet and lost over 100 lbs.  During this diet I cut out all the added salt from everything I ate, and stopped eating salty stuff.  After I reached my goal weight I went to a few different restaurants to try "normal" food again.  Honestly the main thing that I tasted in everything was salt, and it tasted disgusting to me.  I feel restaurants should cut out how much salt they use (not completely though) and allow the customers to add salt if they want it.   But I don't agree with the government "regulating" it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't support the bill , but I do think that restaurant food has way too much salt in it .
I recently went on a diet and lost over 100 lbs .
During this diet I cut out all the added salt from everything I ate , and stopped eating salty stuff .
After I reached my goal weight I went to a few different restaurants to try " normal " food again .
Honestly the main thing that I tasted in everything was salt , and it tasted disgusting to me .
I feel restaurants should cut out how much salt they use ( not completely though ) and allow the customers to add salt if they want it .
But I do n't agree with the government " regulating " it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't support the bill, but I do think that restaurant food has way too much salt in it.
I recently went on a diet and lost over 100 lbs.
During this diet I cut out all the added salt from everything I ate, and stopped eating salty stuff.
After I reached my goal weight I went to a few different restaurants to try "normal" food again.
Honestly the main thing that I tasted in everything was salt, and it tasted disgusting to me.
I feel restaurants should cut out how much salt they use (not completely though) and allow the customers to add salt if they want it.
But I don't agree with the government "regulating" it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442336</id>
	<title>Please...</title>
	<author>garg0yle</author>
	<datestamp>1268339700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>won't somebody think of the PICKLES???  This could be the end of the kosher dill as we know it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wo n't somebody think of the PICKLES ? ? ?
This could be the end of the kosher dill as we know it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>won't somebody think of the PICKLES???
This could be the end of the kosher dill as we know it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444474</id>
	<title>The next logical level</title>
	<author>n5yat</author>
	<datestamp>1268302620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>let's take it to the next level and ban restaurants... no, just ban all food. Problem solved.</htmltext>
<tokenext>let 's take it to the next level and ban restaurants... no , just ban all food .
Problem solved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>let's take it to the next level and ban restaurants... no, just ban all food.
Problem solved.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442936</id>
	<title>Easy fix</title>
	<author>MattGWU</author>
	<datestamp>1268298060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Show up at the next public meeting and pass out bread, chocolate desserts, and steak, all of which were made without salt.  They'll go 'wow, what is this Martian pig slop from hell' and that'll be the last we hear about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Show up at the next public meeting and pass out bread , chocolate desserts , and steak , all of which were made without salt .
They 'll go 'wow , what is this Martian pig slop from hell ' and that 'll be the last we hear about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Show up at the next public meeting and pass out bread, chocolate desserts, and steak, all of which were made without salt.
They'll go 'wow, what is this Martian pig slop from hell' and that'll be the last we hear about it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445016</id>
	<title>What will happen to NYC's China Town?</title>
	<author>AmbianceForce</author>
	<datestamp>1268304540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only thing that has more salt than salt is soy sauce, after all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only thing that has more salt than salt is soy sauce , after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only thing that has more salt than salt is soy sauce, after all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31449916</id>
	<title>Re:Finally</title>
	<author>Mindcontrolled</author>
	<datestamp>1268395020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The spice must flow, man, the spice must flow.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The spice must flow , man , the spice must flow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The spice must flow, man, the spice must flow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445588</id>
	<title>Re:They should involve the NRA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268306940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sir<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. you have turned me into a strong advocate of pun control<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sir .. you have turned me into a strong advocate of pun control . .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sir .. you have turned me into a strong advocate of pun control ..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443162</id>
	<title>Re:ummmmm.....</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1268298780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What exactly does he eat?</p></div><p>
Babies. He's a politician.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What exactly does he eat ?
Babies. He 's a politician .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What exactly does he eat?
Babies. He's a politician.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446136</id>
	<title>Re:An alternative:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268309100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you really think that non-fucking morons are any better?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you really think that non-fucking morons are any better ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you really think that non-fucking morons are any better?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443544</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31449610</id>
	<title>Salt abuse!</title>
	<author>EricTheO</author>
	<datestamp>1268389560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a son of a father that was on a salt restricted diet, and did the cooking for him in hi slater years, due to having had a heart attack, I can state that salt is overused in many fresh and packaged goods. Yes salt is needed in some recipes, but in many more recipes it can be added to the dish by the person eating it rather than added during cooking. You can always add salt but you can't take it out!</p><p>-Eric</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a son of a father that was on a salt restricted diet , and did the cooking for him in hi slater years , due to having had a heart attack , I can state that salt is overused in many fresh and packaged goods .
Yes salt is needed in some recipes , but in many more recipes it can be added to the dish by the person eating it rather than added during cooking .
You can always add salt but you ca n't take it out ! -Eric</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a son of a father that was on a salt restricted diet, and did the cooking for him in hi slater years, due to having had a heart attack, I can state that salt is overused in many fresh and packaged goods.
Yes salt is needed in some recipes, but in many more recipes it can be added to the dish by the person eating it rather than added during cooking.
You can always add salt but you can't take it out!-Eric</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443506</id>
	<title>Re:Go go Nanny State...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268299620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>McDonald's doesn't come to your house and take money out of your wallet. All the money that McDonald's makes is paid to them voluntarily by people who like it's food, otherwise they wouldn't buy it. Of course McDonald's doesn't and shouldn't care if you are obese, that's nobody's business but your own. Don't like greasy disgusting fast food? Easy solution: don't go to a fast food restaurant. Eat salad or something, it's really easy to find, it's right there in the produce section of your local supermarket. Is your opinion of people really so low that you think they can't grasp that simple concept and need a superior intellect such as yours to make decisions for them on what to eat? What an arrogant asshole.</htmltext>
<tokenext>McDonald 's does n't come to your house and take money out of your wallet .
All the money that McDonald 's makes is paid to them voluntarily by people who like it 's food , otherwise they would n't buy it .
Of course McDonald 's does n't and should n't care if you are obese , that 's nobody 's business but your own .
Do n't like greasy disgusting fast food ?
Easy solution : do n't go to a fast food restaurant .
Eat salad or something , it 's really easy to find , it 's right there in the produce section of your local supermarket .
Is your opinion of people really so low that you think they ca n't grasp that simple concept and need a superior intellect such as yours to make decisions for them on what to eat ?
What an arrogant asshole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>McDonald's doesn't come to your house and take money out of your wallet.
All the money that McDonald's makes is paid to them voluntarily by people who like it's food, otherwise they wouldn't buy it.
Of course McDonald's doesn't and shouldn't care if you are obese, that's nobody's business but your own.
Don't like greasy disgusting fast food?
Easy solution: don't go to a fast food restaurant.
Eat salad or something, it's really easy to find, it's right there in the produce section of your local supermarket.
Is your opinion of people really so low that you think they can't grasp that simple concept and need a superior intellect such as yours to make decisions for them on what to eat?
What an arrogant asshole.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442536</id>
	<title>Re:ummmmm.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268340240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dry lettuce.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dry lettuce .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dry lettuce.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444080</id>
	<title>Re:Finally</title>
	<author>magus\_melchior</author>
	<datestamp>1268301420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You think that's bad??? Try getting reeled in by spice traders.</p><p>I'm still having withdrawal symptoms from my last cumin and star anise addiction...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You think that 's bad ? ? ?
Try getting reeled in by spice traders.I 'm still having withdrawal symptoms from my last cumin and star anise addiction.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You think that's bad???
Try getting reeled in by spice traders.I'm still having withdrawal symptoms from my last cumin and star anise addiction...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443586</id>
	<title>The True Story Was..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268299860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The politician thought he was banning Assaults not All Salts in restaurants.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The politician thought he was banning Assaults not All Salts in restaurants .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The politician thought he was banning Assaults not All Salts in restaurants.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444550</id>
	<title>Re:Finally</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1268302920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When I was a yound boy I started doing salt. I figured yea its just salt right? Afterwards I moved on to cracked pepper and eventually later in life started experimenting with parsley, basil and oregeno. Before I knew it I was hooked on Thyme and garlic and I lost everything.</p></div><p>I've got news for you: that wasn't oregano in those brownies.  Unscrupulous spice dealers lace oregano will all sorts of weeds.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was a yound boy I started doing salt .
I figured yea its just salt right ?
Afterwards I moved on to cracked pepper and eventually later in life started experimenting with parsley , basil and oregeno .
Before I knew it I was hooked on Thyme and garlic and I lost everything.I 've got news for you : that was n't oregano in those brownies .
Unscrupulous spice dealers lace oregano will all sorts of weeds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was a yound boy I started doing salt.
I figured yea its just salt right?
Afterwards I moved on to cracked pepper and eventually later in life started experimenting with parsley, basil and oregeno.
Before I knew it I was hooked on Thyme and garlic and I lost everything.I've got news for you: that wasn't oregano in those brownies.
Unscrupulous spice dealers lace oregano will all sorts of weeds.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31451958</id>
	<title>Not only Ortiz</title>
	<author>ColoradoAuthor</author>
	<datestamp>1268410980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just as amazing, Ortiz found at least two other assemblymen to agree with him.  From the bill:
</p><p>
SPONSOR    Ortiz (MS)
</p><p>
COSPNSR    Markey
</p><p>
MLTSPNSR   Perry
</p><p>
I'd think it would be poor politics to sign on to cosponsoring bills I didn't understand. Naive me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just as amazing , Ortiz found at least two other assemblymen to agree with him .
From the bill : SPONSOR Ortiz ( MS ) COSPNSR Markey MLTSPNSR Perry I 'd think it would be poor politics to sign on to cosponsoring bills I did n't understand .
Naive me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just as amazing, Ortiz found at least two other assemblymen to agree with him.
From the bill:

SPONSOR    Ortiz (MS)

COSPNSR    Markey

MLTSPNSR   Perry

I'd think it would be poor politics to sign on to cosponsoring bills I didn't understand.
Naive me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444180</id>
	<title>Life imitates "Art"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268301720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Didn't I see this in Demolition Man?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't I see this in Demolition Man ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't I see this in Demolition Man?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444650</id>
	<title>Re:So what else is new</title>
	<author>jedidiah</author>
	<datestamp>1268303220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Banning sugar next? They're already working hard to push tax on "sugary" sodas and drinks in NY.</p><p>How much you wanna bet that they propose replacing soda with juice? Push one form of sugar water in favor of another...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Banning sugar next ?
They 're already working hard to push tax on " sugary " sodas and drinks in NY.How much you wan na bet that they propose replacing soda with juice ?
Push one form of sugar water in favor of another.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Banning sugar next?
They're already working hard to push tax on "sugary" sodas and drinks in NY.How much you wanna bet that they propose replacing soda with juice?
Push one form of sugar water in favor of another...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445764</id>
	<title>Dieting and sodium</title>
	<author>andrewagill</author>
	<datestamp>1268307780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've actually had to increase my sodium intake to get to the recommended amount. My diet (lost 80 lbs so far!) has been moving me away from processed foods, which means that on some days, I'm consuming as little as 600mg of sodium. The present USDA recommendations (available at <a href="http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/DRI//DRI\_Water/water\_full\_report.pdf" title="usda.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/DRI//DRI\_Water/water\_full\_report.pdf</a> [usda.gov] ) for people my age (9-50) are between 1500 and 2300, unless they're in an at-risk group. This means that some days, I have to add a teaspoon of kosher salt to my food (which can be trouble if you're trying to salt raspberries). The WHO recommends less than 1700mg ( <a href="http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO\_TRS\_916.pdf" title="who.int" rel="nofollow">http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO\_TRS\_916.pdf</a> [who.int] ), so I've been trying to keep my intake between 1500 and 1700.<br>
<br>
In all cases, the WHO recommends keeping your sodium and potassium levels equivalent (70mmol of sodium, 70-80mmol of potassium, or 2800-3200mg of K). Too little potassium/too much sodium results in too much muscle activity and hypertension, too little sodium/too much potassium results in too little muscle activity, heart arrhythmia, respiratory collapse, coma... The FDA recommends a bizarre amount of potassium (120mmol or 4700mg) based on the sodium sensitivity of African Americans and something about kidney stones. For most people who do not have a sodium sensitivity, this will just be eliminated by the body, which may cause problems with the kidneys and liver. Also note that while sodium is mentioned on food labels, potassium is usually not, and some foods are very high in potassium but don't bother to mention it.<br>
<br>
Each of the documents I linked has a long list of studies that they used to determine those levels, but I'd really like to see something more concrete and which doesn't simply vilify sodium. Alas, that's far too common in the diet advice I see online.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've actually had to increase my sodium intake to get to the recommended amount .
My diet ( lost 80 lbs so far !
) has been moving me away from processed foods , which means that on some days , I 'm consuming as little as 600mg of sodium .
The present USDA recommendations ( available at http : //www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/DRI//DRI \ _Water/water \ _full \ _report.pdf [ usda.gov ] ) for people my age ( 9-50 ) are between 1500 and 2300 , unless they 're in an at-risk group .
This means that some days , I have to add a teaspoon of kosher salt to my food ( which can be trouble if you 're trying to salt raspberries ) .
The WHO recommends less than 1700mg ( http : //whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO \ _TRS \ _916.pdf [ who.int ] ) , so I 've been trying to keep my intake between 1500 and 1700 .
In all cases , the WHO recommends keeping your sodium and potassium levels equivalent ( 70mmol of sodium , 70-80mmol of potassium , or 2800-3200mg of K ) .
Too little potassium/too much sodium results in too much muscle activity and hypertension , too little sodium/too much potassium results in too little muscle activity , heart arrhythmia , respiratory collapse , coma... The FDA recommends a bizarre amount of potassium ( 120mmol or 4700mg ) based on the sodium sensitivity of African Americans and something about kidney stones .
For most people who do not have a sodium sensitivity , this will just be eliminated by the body , which may cause problems with the kidneys and liver .
Also note that while sodium is mentioned on food labels , potassium is usually not , and some foods are very high in potassium but do n't bother to mention it .
Each of the documents I linked has a long list of studies that they used to determine those levels , but I 'd really like to see something more concrete and which does n't simply vilify sodium .
Alas , that 's far too common in the diet advice I see online .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've actually had to increase my sodium intake to get to the recommended amount.
My diet (lost 80 lbs so far!
) has been moving me away from processed foods, which means that on some days, I'm consuming as little as 600mg of sodium.
The present USDA recommendations (available at http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/DRI//DRI\_Water/water\_full\_report.pdf [usda.gov] ) for people my age (9-50) are between 1500 and 2300, unless they're in an at-risk group.
This means that some days, I have to add a teaspoon of kosher salt to my food (which can be trouble if you're trying to salt raspberries).
The WHO recommends less than 1700mg ( http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO\_TRS\_916.pdf [who.int] ), so I've been trying to keep my intake between 1500 and 1700.
In all cases, the WHO recommends keeping your sodium and potassium levels equivalent (70mmol of sodium, 70-80mmol of potassium, or 2800-3200mg of K).
Too little potassium/too much sodium results in too much muscle activity and hypertension, too little sodium/too much potassium results in too little muscle activity, heart arrhythmia, respiratory collapse, coma... The FDA recommends a bizarre amount of potassium (120mmol or 4700mg) based on the sodium sensitivity of African Americans and something about kidney stones.
For most people who do not have a sodium sensitivity, this will just be eliminated by the body, which may cause problems with the kidneys and liver.
Also note that while sodium is mentioned on food labels, potassium is usually not, and some foods are very high in potassium but don't bother to mention it.
Each of the documents I linked has a long list of studies that they used to determine those levels, but I'd really like to see something more concrete and which doesn't simply vilify sodium.
Alas, that's far too common in the diet advice I see online.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444224</id>
	<title>Re:Thank god</title>
	<author>starcraftsicko</author>
	<datestamp>1268301840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In practice, why would that matter to anybody here?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In practice , why would that matter to anybody here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In practice, why would that matter to anybody here?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31452502</id>
	<title>Re:An alternative:</title>
	<author>cbope</author>
	<datestamp>1268413500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because everyone voting in an election would be in prison on Federal "electing a fucking moron" charges? Do the words elected official and intelligence even belong in the same sentence? Kind of like military intelligence. Or jumbo shrimp. What was I saying again...?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because everyone voting in an election would be in prison on Federal " electing a fucking moron " charges ?
Do the words elected official and intelligence even belong in the same sentence ?
Kind of like military intelligence .
Or jumbo shrimp .
What was I saying again... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because everyone voting in an election would be in prison on Federal "electing a fucking moron" charges?
Do the words elected official and intelligence even belong in the same sentence?
Kind of like military intelligence.
Or jumbo shrimp.
What was I saying again...?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443544</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447338</id>
	<title>If salt is bad for you...</title>
	<author>EmagGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1268315820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... why does the government recommend you consume 2000mg/day of it?</p><p>Why do you pass out and go brain dead if you have a deficiency of it?</p><p>Why is it absolutely necessary for normal functioning of the nervous system?</p><p>These people are IDIOTS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... why does the government recommend you consume 2000mg/day of it ? Why do you pass out and go brain dead if you have a deficiency of it ? Why is it absolutely necessary for normal functioning of the nervous system ? These people are IDIOTS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... why does the government recommend you consume 2000mg/day of it?Why do you pass out and go brain dead if you have a deficiency of it?Why is it absolutely necessary for normal functioning of the nervous system?These people are IDIOTS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446778</id>
	<title>Trying to argue with "science and facts", pff</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268312460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All you guys defending salt sound like a bunch of potheads</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All you guys defending salt sound like a bunch of potheads</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All you guys defending salt sound like a bunch of potheads</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443682</id>
	<title>What would Gandhi do?</title>
	<author>RevWaldo</author>
	<datestamp>1268300160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>To protest the British Empire's control and taxation of salt, Mohandas K. (Mahatma) Gandhi led a 200+ mile march to the sea, where he made an illegal batch of salt. This sparked large scale acts of civil disobedience against the salt laws by millions of Indians, and was a major step on the long road to the independence of India.<br> <br>
If the British Raj had try to <i>ban</i> the use of salt outright, however, I suspect Gandhi - being a devout vegetarian - would have handed out cricket bats to every available man, woman, and child and led a march straight to New Delhi.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To protest the British Empire 's control and taxation of salt , Mohandas K. ( Mahatma ) Gandhi led a 200 + mile march to the sea , where he made an illegal batch of salt .
This sparked large scale acts of civil disobedience against the salt laws by millions of Indians , and was a major step on the long road to the independence of India .
If the British Raj had try to ban the use of salt outright , however , I suspect Gandhi - being a devout vegetarian - would have handed out cricket bats to every available man , woman , and child and led a march straight to New Delhi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To protest the British Empire's control and taxation of salt, Mohandas K. (Mahatma) Gandhi led a 200+ mile march to the sea, where he made an illegal batch of salt.
This sparked large scale acts of civil disobedience against the salt laws by millions of Indians, and was a major step on the long road to the independence of India.
If the British Raj had try to ban the use of salt outright, however, I suspect Gandhi - being a devout vegetarian - would have handed out cricket bats to every available man, woman, and child and led a march straight to New Delhi.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31453046</id>
	<title>And PI is now 3</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268416440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Idiots! This is right up there with the dweebs who decided a few years ago that PI should be 3. Salt is an essential part of our diet, to say nothing about the chemical processes that allow us to think and move. Clearly this guy is an example of the need to administer IQ tests to run for public office. Problem is, from some of the recent characters on the political scene, its not clear as to which end of the gene pool the electorate wants to fish. Anyhow, if they support people with well intentioned but seriously disfunctional ideas like this, they deserve what they get.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Idiots !
This is right up there with the dweebs who decided a few years ago that PI should be 3 .
Salt is an essential part of our diet , to say nothing about the chemical processes that allow us to think and move .
Clearly this guy is an example of the need to administer IQ tests to run for public office .
Problem is , from some of the recent characters on the political scene , its not clear as to which end of the gene pool the electorate wants to fish .
Anyhow , if they support people with well intentioned but seriously disfunctional ideas like this , they deserve what they get .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Idiots!
This is right up there with the dweebs who decided a few years ago that PI should be 3.
Salt is an essential part of our diet, to say nothing about the chemical processes that allow us to think and move.
Clearly this guy is an example of the need to administer IQ tests to run for public office.
Problem is, from some of the recent characters on the political scene, its not clear as to which end of the gene pool the electorate wants to fish.
Anyhow, if they support people with well intentioned but seriously disfunctional ideas like this, they deserve what they get.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445850</id>
	<title>Re:So what else is new</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268308080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right. Because Nixon, Carter, and Clinton made everything come up rainbows.</p><p>The problem is not with the intelligence of politicians. The problem is the existence of politicians.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right .
Because Nixon , Carter , and Clinton made everything come up rainbows.The problem is not with the intelligence of politicians .
The problem is the existence of politicians .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right.
Because Nixon, Carter, and Clinton made everything come up rainbows.The problem is not with the intelligence of politicians.
The problem is the existence of politicians.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444396</id>
	<title>Does he want to ban vitamins C and D as well?</title>
	<author>meerling</author>
	<datestamp>1268302440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Salt (more specifically sodium chloride) is needed for your continuing good health.<br>It's the same with iodine and many many other things.<br>What do they all have in common?<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Take too much and it will mess you up.<br><br>I've seen people get sick from taking too many vitamins. Is he going to ban those as well.<br>People have died from drinking too much water, guess he'll ban water also.<br>And don't forget food. That most heinous of delectables, eat too much and you'll get obese, and we know what obesity does to your health, better ban that too...<br><br>To put it simply, Mister Ortiz, you are a very dangerous imbecile that needs to learn about basic nutrition and sciences. Until then, keep you unhealthy and absurd ideas to yourself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Salt ( more specifically sodium chloride ) is needed for your continuing good health.It 's the same with iodine and many many other things.What do they all have in common ?
        Take too much and it will mess you up.I 've seen people get sick from taking too many vitamins .
Is he going to ban those as well.People have died from drinking too much water , guess he 'll ban water also.And do n't forget food .
That most heinous of delectables , eat too much and you 'll get obese , and we know what obesity does to your health , better ban that too...To put it simply , Mister Ortiz , you are a very dangerous imbecile that needs to learn about basic nutrition and sciences .
Until then , keep you unhealthy and absurd ideas to yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Salt (more specifically sodium chloride) is needed for your continuing good health.It's the same with iodine and many many other things.What do they all have in common?
        Take too much and it will mess you up.I've seen people get sick from taking too many vitamins.
Is he going to ban those as well.People have died from drinking too much water, guess he'll ban water also.And don't forget food.
That most heinous of delectables, eat too much and you'll get obese, and we know what obesity does to your health, better ban that too...To put it simply, Mister Ortiz, you are a very dangerous imbecile that needs to learn about basic nutrition and sciences.
Until then, keep you unhealthy and absurd ideas to yourself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31452688</id>
	<title>Stolen idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268414520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've seen this before.. in "Demolition Man".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've seen this before.. in " Demolition Man " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've seen this before.. in "Demolition Man".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442964</id>
	<title>This sounds familiar...</title>
	<author>TeethWhitener</author>
	<datestamp>1268298180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wasn't this a plot device in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demolition\_Man\_(film)#Setting" title="wikipedia.org">Demolition Man</a> [wikipedia.org]?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't this a plot device in Demolition Man [ wikipedia.org ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't this a plot device in Demolition Man [wikipedia.org]?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445986</id>
	<title>For the Public Good</title>
	<author>JumperCable</author>
	<datestamp>1268308620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look, we have already been through this with the saturated fat ban &amp; smoking ban.  These are all efforts to improve public health.  It's for your own good.  Stop fighting it.  Some people just don't get it and want to live in the dark ages.  Try being more progressive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look , we have already been through this with the saturated fat ban &amp; smoking ban .
These are all efforts to improve public health .
It 's for your own good .
Stop fighting it .
Some people just do n't get it and want to live in the dark ages .
Try being more progressive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look, we have already been through this with the saturated fat ban &amp; smoking ban.
These are all efforts to improve public health.
It's for your own good.
Stop fighting it.
Some people just don't get it and want to live in the dark ages.
Try being more progressive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443978</id>
	<title>Re:They should involve the NRA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268301060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ban a salt and battery?<br>But how will we make fish and chips?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ban a salt and battery ? But how will we make fish and chips ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ban a salt and battery?But how will we make fish and chips?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31456852</id>
	<title>Oh no!</title>
	<author>raind</author>
	<datestamp>1268389620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone tell the oceans, what will the fish do?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone tell the oceans , what will the fish do ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone tell the oceans, what will the fish do?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443964</id>
	<title>Re:Nails are dangerous too...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268301000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They build houses in Japan without nails.  So it could happen</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They build houses in Japan without nails .
So it could happen</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They build houses in Japan without nails.
So it could happen</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444338</id>
	<title>Re:Inevitable.</title>
	<author>Animaether</author>
	<datestamp>1268302200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So uhmm... crack cocaine, heroine in section 8 and cyanide, phosgene in section 9 of your corner store, then?</p><p>There are already bans on some things where, if you're not careful about the use of it - and most people aren't, the ban is probably a good thing.</p><p>Given the amount of salt in people's diets these days - not just from restaurants but also from pre-packaged items - heck it might just be a good thing.  Just lave the table salt on the table.  If somebody then wants to empty the contents of the shaker into their bowl, that's their good right.. but it just might be an eye-opener for people.</p><p>Disclaimer: I'm in NL where restaurants aren't targeted so much, but producers of foodstuffs are; and rightly so.. some of the pre-packaged pre-cut cream spinach you get here, for example, is hideously salty - glad I usually buy frozen or fresh (prep time is the barrier for getting fresh spinach more frequently).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So uhmm... crack cocaine , heroine in section 8 and cyanide , phosgene in section 9 of your corner store , then ? There are already bans on some things where , if you 're not careful about the use of it - and most people are n't , the ban is probably a good thing.Given the amount of salt in people 's diets these days - not just from restaurants but also from pre-packaged items - heck it might just be a good thing .
Just lave the table salt on the table .
If somebody then wants to empty the contents of the shaker into their bowl , that 's their good right.. but it just might be an eye-opener for people.Disclaimer : I 'm in NL where restaurants are n't targeted so much , but producers of foodstuffs are ; and rightly so.. some of the pre-packaged pre-cut cream spinach you get here , for example , is hideously salty - glad I usually buy frozen or fresh ( prep time is the barrier for getting fresh spinach more frequently ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So uhmm... crack cocaine, heroine in section 8 and cyanide, phosgene in section 9 of your corner store, then?There are already bans on some things where, if you're not careful about the use of it - and most people aren't, the ban is probably a good thing.Given the amount of salt in people's diets these days - not just from restaurants but also from pre-packaged items - heck it might just be a good thing.
Just lave the table salt on the table.
If somebody then wants to empty the contents of the shaker into their bowl, that's their good right.. but it just might be an eye-opener for people.Disclaimer: I'm in NL where restaurants aren't targeted so much, but producers of foodstuffs are; and rightly so.. some of the pre-packaged pre-cut cream spinach you get here, for example, is hideously salty - glad I usually buy frozen or fresh (prep time is the barrier for getting fresh spinach more frequently).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442120</id>
	<title>Go go Nanny State...</title>
	<author>FroMan</author>
	<datestamp>1268339100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you really want the government telling you what you cannot eat?</p><p>Stay out of my bedroom, welcome to my kitchen?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you really want the government telling you what you can not eat ? Stay out of my bedroom , welcome to my kitchen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you really want the government telling you what you cannot eat?Stay out of my bedroom, welcome to my kitchen?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447574</id>
	<title>Re:Salt really isn't all that bad...</title>
	<author>ZorinLynx</author>
	<datestamp>1268317560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;please start requiring restaurants to label their foods (on the menu)</p><p>This is a bad idea. While companies like Wendy's and Burger King can easily afford to do the lab work required to print up nutritional info for their plates, small family-owned restaurants cannot, and this will hurt them severely.</p><p>You need to think about ALL the ramifications of these sort of ideas before pushing them. Do you really want nothing but the Burger Kings and Pizza Huts to survive? Yeah, I didn't think so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; please start requiring restaurants to label their foods ( on the menu ) This is a bad idea .
While companies like Wendy 's and Burger King can easily afford to do the lab work required to print up nutritional info for their plates , small family-owned restaurants can not , and this will hurt them severely.You need to think about ALL the ramifications of these sort of ideas before pushing them .
Do you really want nothing but the Burger Kings and Pizza Huts to survive ?
Yeah , I did n't think so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;please start requiring restaurants to label their foods (on the menu)This is a bad idea.
While companies like Wendy's and Burger King can easily afford to do the lab work required to print up nutritional info for their plates, small family-owned restaurants cannot, and this will hurt them severely.You need to think about ALL the ramifications of these sort of ideas before pushing them.
Do you really want nothing but the Burger Kings and Pizza Huts to survive?
Yeah, I didn't think so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444088</id>
	<title>Re:This just in!</title>
	<author>Loomismeister</author>
	<datestamp>1268301420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This strikes me as an article from The Onion. That's how ridiculous it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This strikes me as an article from The Onion .
That 's how ridiculous it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This strikes me as an article from The Onion.
That's how ridiculous it is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448988</id>
	<title>Re:Less Govt. Intervention, not more.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268335440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I was having a similar discussion with my husband the other day...</p></div><p>
Husband? slashdot? That's not possible...<br>
<br>
Wait.. OOOHHHHHH</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was having a similar discussion with my husband the other day.. . Husband ? slashdot ?
That 's not possible.. . Wait.. OOOHHHHHH</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was having a similar discussion with my husband the other day...
Husband? slashdot?
That's not possible...

Wait.. OOOHHHHHH
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445146</id>
	<title>NYC is a food Mecca</title>
	<author>CharlieG</author>
	<datestamp>1268305140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NYC has a LOT of very high end resturants, and I'll bet you that almost every chef uses some table salt in at least some salt (in moderation - I'm NOT talking fast food quantities here)</p><p>How much you want to bet that a LOT of the better chefs will move to Long Island, NJ or Westchester, and there goes the money from the high end dinning</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NYC has a LOT of very high end resturants , and I 'll bet you that almost every chef uses some table salt in at least some salt ( in moderation - I 'm NOT talking fast food quantities here ) How much you want to bet that a LOT of the better chefs will move to Long Island , NJ or Westchester , and there goes the money from the high end dinning</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NYC has a LOT of very high end resturants, and I'll bet you that almost every chef uses some table salt in at least some salt (in moderation - I'm NOT talking fast food quantities here)How much you want to bet that a LOT of the better chefs will move to Long Island, NJ or Westchester, and there goes the money from the high end dinning</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448100</id>
	<title>We're doomed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268322120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unreal. Freakin idiot politicians. No wonder this country is in the crapper</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unreal .
Freakin idiot politicians .
No wonder this country is in the crapper</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unreal.
Freakin idiot politicians.
No wonder this country is in the crapper</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443544</id>
	<title>An alternative:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268299740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why don't we just make it a Federal crime to elect a fucking moron?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't we just make it a Federal crime to elect a fucking moron ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't we just make it a Federal crime to elect a fucking moron?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446704</id>
	<title>Re:Some people are idiots</title>
	<author>anaesthetica</author>
	<datestamp>1268312100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The solution is obviously to legislate a ban on legislation.  That's the logical response, anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The solution is obviously to legislate a ban on legislation .
That 's the logical response , anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The solution is obviously to legislate a ban on legislation.
That's the logical response, anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446558</id>
	<title>Re:Nails are dangerous too...</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1268311200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I stepped on a nail once when I was a kid... It hurt.

They should pass a law that makes it illegal for carpenters to use nails so this never happens to another innocent child.</p></div><p>A friend's grandmother was killed in a fire fueled by her oxygen tank.  We should ban oxygen (even atmospheric).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I stepped on a nail once when I was a kid... It hurt .
They should pass a law that makes it illegal for carpenters to use nails so this never happens to another innocent child.A friend 's grandmother was killed in a fire fueled by her oxygen tank .
We should ban oxygen ( even atmospheric ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I stepped on a nail once when I was a kid... It hurt.
They should pass a law that makes it illegal for carpenters to use nails so this never happens to another innocent child.A friend's grandmother was killed in a fire fueled by her oxygen tank.
We should ban oxygen (even atmospheric).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442742</id>
	<title>Re:Fail</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268340780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd be more inclined to believe he simply wants more money to pass through his hands, and more power which he can leverage for his own benefit. In the business of government, the more money passing through your hands, the more you stand to benefit. It doesn't matter where the money goes -- as long as it passes through your hands, you win.</p><p>"Reacting emotinally" is exactly what he wants you to believe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd be more inclined to believe he simply wants more money to pass through his hands , and more power which he can leverage for his own benefit .
In the business of government , the more money passing through your hands , the more you stand to benefit .
It does n't matter where the money goes -- as long as it passes through your hands , you win .
" Reacting emotinally " is exactly what he wants you to believe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd be more inclined to believe he simply wants more money to pass through his hands, and more power which he can leverage for his own benefit.
In the business of government, the more money passing through your hands, the more you stand to benefit.
It doesn't matter where the money goes -- as long as it passes through your hands, you win.
"Reacting emotinally" is exactly what he wants you to believe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442650</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>twidarkling</author>
	<datestamp>1268340540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"My name is Felix Oritz. You killed my father. Prepare to die."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" My name is Felix Oritz .
You killed my father .
Prepare to die .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"My name is Felix Oritz.
You killed my father.
Prepare to die.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442428</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>CorporateSuit</author>
	<datestamp>1268339880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Salt killed his father.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Salt killed his father .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Salt killed his father.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448880</id>
	<title>Re:Some people are idiots</title>
	<author>ShakaUVM</author>
	<datestamp>1268332980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;Why is banning the solution to everything? I don't get it. People love to ban anything with legislation, it's completely illogical.</p><p>It's not. It's heavy handed, but not illogical. The food industry has proven to be completely unable to control salt levels in food, with levels skyrocketing in recent years.</p><p>I actually found out that for all my eating (relatively) healthy and exercise, I've been developing hypertension. So I tried to go on a low-salt diet. Guess what? Unless you eat nothing but fresh food (yeah, yeah, I know), you will exceed the recommended daily salt level by probably about 3x or so. Every day. For your entire life. Most items you order from fast food restaurants exceed your entire daily recommended maximum, with just one item. And you are getting the burrito with a taco, right?</p><p>The way that blood pressure works, you have a certain amount of damage resistance against the temporary hypertension caused by eating a lot of salt. However, if you keep spiking your blood pressure, over time your basal blood pressure will increase and you'll develop permanent pre-hypertension and then hypertension. Which is bad, for a variety of reasons.</p><p>Just to humor yourself, the next time you go to a restaurant, ask for the nutritional menu. The recommended level of salt intake is 1000 to 1500mg (1g to 1.5g), though the USDA recommended amount is around 2400 or so. So we'll use 1500mg as a baseline. You're eating three meals a day? Divide 1500 / 3 = 500mg. Now look at the nutritional menu and see what you can order that will add up to 500mg of sodium or less. Have fun with that.</p><p>Cornflakes - that's healthy, right? 1100mg in one 30g serving.<br>Bacon - ok, we know that's not good. But cheese is worse!<br>We think fries are bad, but a large order only has 330mg! That "healthy" grilled chicken sandwich, though, has 1690mg of sodium in it!<br>What has more salt, hash browns or a cinnamon roll from McDonalds? (The cinnamon roll has 3x the sodium of a side of hash browns!)</p><p>Go to a grocery store, pull any box of cereal, or nearly anything at all edible and not fresh, and you'll see that it's nearly impossible to eat 500mg or less per meal.</p><p>I don't agree that banning it outright is the solution (for various reasons), but this IS a public health issue, and one that has gone completely unreported until now. If nothing else, the pressure from this will encourage places to reduce their sodium intake. In the UK, they managed to drop sodium levels to 1/3rd of their previous values - and the food tasted the same.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; Why is banning the solution to everything ?
I do n't get it .
People love to ban anything with legislation , it 's completely illogical.It 's not .
It 's heavy handed , but not illogical .
The food industry has proven to be completely unable to control salt levels in food , with levels skyrocketing in recent years.I actually found out that for all my eating ( relatively ) healthy and exercise , I 've been developing hypertension .
So I tried to go on a low-salt diet .
Guess what ?
Unless you eat nothing but fresh food ( yeah , yeah , I know ) , you will exceed the recommended daily salt level by probably about 3x or so .
Every day .
For your entire life .
Most items you order from fast food restaurants exceed your entire daily recommended maximum , with just one item .
And you are getting the burrito with a taco , right ? The way that blood pressure works , you have a certain amount of damage resistance against the temporary hypertension caused by eating a lot of salt .
However , if you keep spiking your blood pressure , over time your basal blood pressure will increase and you 'll develop permanent pre-hypertension and then hypertension .
Which is bad , for a variety of reasons.Just to humor yourself , the next time you go to a restaurant , ask for the nutritional menu .
The recommended level of salt intake is 1000 to 1500mg ( 1g to 1.5g ) , though the USDA recommended amount is around 2400 or so .
So we 'll use 1500mg as a baseline .
You 're eating three meals a day ?
Divide 1500 / 3 = 500mg .
Now look at the nutritional menu and see what you can order that will add up to 500mg of sodium or less .
Have fun with that.Cornflakes - that 's healthy , right ?
1100mg in one 30g serving.Bacon - ok , we know that 's not good .
But cheese is worse ! We think fries are bad , but a large order only has 330mg !
That " healthy " grilled chicken sandwich , though , has 1690mg of sodium in it ! What has more salt , hash browns or a cinnamon roll from McDonalds ?
( The cinnamon roll has 3x the sodium of a side of hash browns !
) Go to a grocery store , pull any box of cereal , or nearly anything at all edible and not fresh , and you 'll see that it 's nearly impossible to eat 500mg or less per meal.I do n't agree that banning it outright is the solution ( for various reasons ) , but this IS a public health issue , and one that has gone completely unreported until now .
If nothing else , the pressure from this will encourage places to reduce their sodium intake .
In the UK , they managed to drop sodium levels to 1/3rd of their previous values - and the food tasted the same .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;Why is banning the solution to everything?
I don't get it.
People love to ban anything with legislation, it's completely illogical.It's not.
It's heavy handed, but not illogical.
The food industry has proven to be completely unable to control salt levels in food, with levels skyrocketing in recent years.I actually found out that for all my eating (relatively) healthy and exercise, I've been developing hypertension.
So I tried to go on a low-salt diet.
Guess what?
Unless you eat nothing but fresh food (yeah, yeah, I know), you will exceed the recommended daily salt level by probably about 3x or so.
Every day.
For your entire life.
Most items you order from fast food restaurants exceed your entire daily recommended maximum, with just one item.
And you are getting the burrito with a taco, right?The way that blood pressure works, you have a certain amount of damage resistance against the temporary hypertension caused by eating a lot of salt.
However, if you keep spiking your blood pressure, over time your basal blood pressure will increase and you'll develop permanent pre-hypertension and then hypertension.
Which is bad, for a variety of reasons.Just to humor yourself, the next time you go to a restaurant, ask for the nutritional menu.
The recommended level of salt intake is 1000 to 1500mg (1g to 1.5g), though the USDA recommended amount is around 2400 or so.
So we'll use 1500mg as a baseline.
You're eating three meals a day?
Divide 1500 / 3 = 500mg.
Now look at the nutritional menu and see what you can order that will add up to 500mg of sodium or less.
Have fun with that.Cornflakes - that's healthy, right?
1100mg in one 30g serving.Bacon - ok, we know that's not good.
But cheese is worse!We think fries are bad, but a large order only has 330mg!
That "healthy" grilled chicken sandwich, though, has 1690mg of sodium in it!What has more salt, hash browns or a cinnamon roll from McDonalds?
(The cinnamon roll has 3x the sodium of a side of hash browns!
)Go to a grocery store, pull any box of cereal, or nearly anything at all edible and not fresh, and you'll see that it's nearly impossible to eat 500mg or less per meal.I don't agree that banning it outright is the solution (for various reasons), but this IS a public health issue, and one that has gone completely unreported until now.
If nothing else, the pressure from this will encourage places to reduce their sodium intake.
In the UK, they managed to drop sodium levels to 1/3rd of their previous values - and the food tasted the same.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443644</id>
	<title>Re:Bad ideas last forever</title>
	<author>c++0xFF</author>
	<datestamp>1268300040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The problem isn't this bill, which won't pass.  The problem is that bad ideas like this, once introduced, have a life of their own.  They keep getting reintroduced until they do pass.  (good ideas, on the other hand, get shelved and are never heard from again).</p></div><p>So which type is health care reform?</p><p>No, the problem isn't the bills themselves, but politicians.  Laws are written by people who have no experience relevant to the content of the law, and whether or not they pass is purely a political issue, not one of what is the right thing to do.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is n't this bill , which wo n't pass .
The problem is that bad ideas like this , once introduced , have a life of their own .
They keep getting reintroduced until they do pass .
( good ideas , on the other hand , get shelved and are never heard from again ) .So which type is health care reform ? No , the problem is n't the bills themselves , but politicians .
Laws are written by people who have no experience relevant to the content of the law , and whether or not they pass is purely a political issue , not one of what is the right thing to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem isn't this bill, which won't pass.
The problem is that bad ideas like this, once introduced, have a life of their own.
They keep getting reintroduced until they do pass.
(good ideas, on the other hand, get shelved and are never heard from again).So which type is health care reform?No, the problem isn't the bills themselves, but politicians.
Laws are written by people who have no experience relevant to the content of the law, and whether or not they pass is purely a political issue, not one of what is the right thing to do.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445062</id>
	<title>Tequila</title>
	<author>Alain Williams</author>
	<datestamp>1268304720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does this mean that the bars are not going to be able to serve Tequila properly (with salt &amp; lime)?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean that the bars are not going to be able to serve Tequila properly ( with salt &amp; lime ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean that the bars are not going to be able to serve Tequila properly (with salt &amp; lime)?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446814</id>
	<title>Re:Some people are idiots</title>
	<author>cmseagle</author>
	<datestamp>1268312700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because the reasonable form of banning something is regulating it, and saying that you want to regulate something gets you labeled as a psycho socialist.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because the reasonable form of banning something is regulating it , and saying that you want to regulate something gets you labeled as a psycho socialist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because the reasonable form of banning something is regulating it, and saying that you want to regulate something gets you labeled as a psycho socialist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442492</id>
	<title>Re:So what else is new</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268340060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Banning sugar next? They're already working hard to push tax on "sugary" sodas and drinks in NY.</p><p>I love the loaded language. Sugary, like we're talking about a bottle full of sugar. And they don't even seem to make much of a distinction about the types of sugar used, other than expecting us all to accept artificial sweetners as a reasonable alternative.</p><p>And even better, they're claiming that the money earned by this tax will help pay for other programs. I love this bullshit. So, do they really want people to stop buying these drinks, putting an end to this revenue stream? Of course not! They hope people will  go on buying this stuff, giving them another way of digging into our pockets for some extra money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Banning sugar next ?
They 're already working hard to push tax on " sugary " sodas and drinks in NY.I love the loaded language .
Sugary , like we 're talking about a bottle full of sugar .
And they do n't even seem to make much of a distinction about the types of sugar used , other than expecting us all to accept artificial sweetners as a reasonable alternative.And even better , they 're claiming that the money earned by this tax will help pay for other programs .
I love this bullshit .
So , do they really want people to stop buying these drinks , putting an end to this revenue stream ?
Of course not !
They hope people will go on buying this stuff , giving them another way of digging into our pockets for some extra money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Banning sugar next?
They're already working hard to push tax on "sugary" sodas and drinks in NY.I love the loaded language.
Sugary, like we're talking about a bottle full of sugar.
And they don't even seem to make much of a distinction about the types of sugar used, other than expecting us all to accept artificial sweetners as a reasonable alternative.And even better, they're claiming that the money earned by this tax will help pay for other programs.
I love this bullshit.
So, do they really want people to stop buying these drinks, putting an end to this revenue stream?
Of course not!
They hope people will  go on buying this stuff, giving them another way of digging into our pockets for some extra money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444036</id>
	<title>What's next?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268301240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe they should get him to ban hydrogen dioxide next.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dihydrogen\_monoxide\_hoax</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they should get him to ban hydrogen dioxide next .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dihydrogen \ _monoxide \ _hoax</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they should get him to ban hydrogen dioxide next.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dihydrogen\_monoxide\_hoax</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445176</id>
	<title>Drug music</title>
	<author>snspdaarf</author>
	<datestamp>1268305200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who would have thought that "Parsley, Sage, Rosemary, and Thyme" was an evil coded message meant to get our kids hooked. (Hey, is that Clapton's version of "Cocaine"? Turn it up!)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who would have thought that " Parsley , Sage , Rosemary , and Thyme " was an evil coded message meant to get our kids hooked .
( Hey , is that Clapton 's version of " Cocaine " ?
Turn it up !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who would have thought that "Parsley, Sage, Rosemary, and Thyme" was an evil coded message meant to get our kids hooked.
(Hey, is that Clapton's version of "Cocaine"?
Turn it up!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446212</id>
	<title>Re:So what else is new</title>
	<author>The End Of Days</author>
	<datestamp>1268309400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hahahaha you're cute, thinking that the people running the country aren't absolutely brilliant.  They're taking whatever they want from whoever they want and thumbing their noses at anyone who tries to stop them.  They happily let you believe they're stupid while they ram their giant metaphorical cocks straight up your collective asses.  It would be funny if it weren't so fuckin sad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hahahaha you 're cute , thinking that the people running the country are n't absolutely brilliant .
They 're taking whatever they want from whoever they want and thumbing their noses at anyone who tries to stop them .
They happily let you believe they 're stupid while they ram their giant metaphorical cocks straight up your collective asses .
It would be funny if it were n't so fuckin sad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hahahaha you're cute, thinking that the people running the country aren't absolutely brilliant.
They're taking whatever they want from whoever they want and thumbing their noses at anyone who tries to stop them.
They happily let you believe they're stupid while they ram their giant metaphorical cocks straight up your collective asses.
It would be funny if it weren't so fuckin sad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442264</id>
	<title>This is just what we need...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268339520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>a bill to make our food taste awful.  Let us just take a look at how this can help.   Just think of all the money people will save by not going out to eat because the food tastes like shite.  Of course if people stop going out to eat then restaurants will have to lay off workers or even go out of business.  Those people that are now out of jobs can save what little money they get on unemployment by not going out to eat - at least for a few months until their unemployment runs out and they lose their homes.  More lost jobs because some shite for brains politician knows nothing and wants to get his name in the paper. </p><p>Instead of cutting salt out of their diets people could get healthier by getting more exercise - like kicking politicians in the ass when they have stupid ideas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>a bill to make our food taste awful .
Let us just take a look at how this can help .
Just think of all the money people will save by not going out to eat because the food tastes like shite .
Of course if people stop going out to eat then restaurants will have to lay off workers or even go out of business .
Those people that are now out of jobs can save what little money they get on unemployment by not going out to eat - at least for a few months until their unemployment runs out and they lose their homes .
More lost jobs because some shite for brains politician knows nothing and wants to get his name in the paper .
Instead of cutting salt out of their diets people could get healthier by getting more exercise - like kicking politicians in the ass when they have stupid ideas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a bill to make our food taste awful.
Let us just take a look at how this can help.
Just think of all the money people will save by not going out to eat because the food tastes like shite.
Of course if people stop going out to eat then restaurants will have to lay off workers or even go out of business.
Those people that are now out of jobs can save what little money they get on unemployment by not going out to eat - at least for a few months until their unemployment runs out and they lose their homes.
More lost jobs because some shite for brains politician knows nothing and wants to get his name in the paper.
Instead of cutting salt out of their diets people could get healthier by getting more exercise - like kicking politicians in the ass when they have stupid ideas.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443992</id>
	<title>Here's the antidote</title>
	<author>kanweg</author>
	<datestamp>1268301120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have one or two glasses of water accompany your dinner. There is a special device in your body specialized in excreting excess salt.</p><p>Salt not only has a flavour of its own, but enhances other flavours. Enjoy it.</p><p>Bert</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have one or two glasses of water accompany your dinner .
There is a special device in your body specialized in excreting excess salt.Salt not only has a flavour of its own , but enhances other flavours .
Enjoy it.Bert</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have one or two glasses of water accompany your dinner.
There is a special device in your body specialized in excreting excess salt.Salt not only has a flavour of its own, but enhances other flavours.
Enjoy it.Bert</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442160</id>
	<title>*facepalm*</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268339220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Honestly.<br>Why not remove all fat from food too?<br>And sugar.<br>And calories.<br>That way we'll all be uber healthy and slim, right?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...Guys?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Honestly.Why not remove all fat from food too ? And sugar.And calories.That way we 'll all be uber healthy and slim , right ?
... ...Guys ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Honestly.Why not remove all fat from food too?And sugar.And calories.That way we'll all be uber healthy and slim, right?
... ...Guys?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442522</id>
	<title>Re:Bad ideas last forever</title>
	<author>d34dluk3</author>
	<datestamp>1268340180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They've already assaulted baked goods by banning trans-fats (certain baked goods need shortening for texture).</p></div><p>Given that describing trans-fats as poison would not be too far from the truth, I'm not sure improving baked good texture is a very good justification for using them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 've already assaulted baked goods by banning trans-fats ( certain baked goods need shortening for texture ) .Given that describing trans-fats as poison would not be too far from the truth , I 'm not sure improving baked good texture is a very good justification for using them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They've already assaulted baked goods by banning trans-fats (certain baked goods need shortening for texture).Given that describing trans-fats as poison would not be too far from the truth, I'm not sure improving baked good texture is a very good justification for using them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448684</id>
	<title>Good old green trans fats.</title>
	<author>Valdrax</author>
	<datestamp>1268329500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So now your "Zero Trans Fat" cookie contains an equally damaging amount of saturated fats from the palm oil.</p></div><p>Let's also not forget that the increased demand for palm oil is leading to <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=harvesting-palm-oil-and-rainforests" title="scientificamerican.com">the destruction of rain forests.</a> [scientificamerican.com]  Rain forests that wouldn't be destroyed if we just went back to hydrogenated soybean oil.</p><p>What's a health-conscious, environmentally-aware New Yorker to do?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So now your " Zero Trans Fat " cookie contains an equally damaging amount of saturated fats from the palm oil.Let 's also not forget that the increased demand for palm oil is leading to the destruction of rain forests .
[ scientificamerican.com ] Rain forests that would n't be destroyed if we just went back to hydrogenated soybean oil.What 's a health-conscious , environmentally-aware New Yorker to do ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So now your "Zero Trans Fat" cookie contains an equally damaging amount of saturated fats from the palm oil.Let's also not forget that the increased demand for palm oil is leading to the destruction of rain forests.
[scientificamerican.com]  Rain forests that wouldn't be destroyed if we just went back to hydrogenated soybean oil.What's a health-conscious, environmentally-aware New Yorker to do?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442862</id>
	<title>Oritz is apparently an idiot...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268341140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ortiz admits that prior to introducing the bill he did not research salt's role in food chemistry, <b>its effect on flavor</b> or his bill's ramifications for the restaurant industry. He tells me he was prompted to introduce the bill because his father used salt excessively for many years, developed high blood pressure and had a heart attack.</p></div><p>Emphasis mine. According to this statement, Oritz says that he did not consider that banning salt in restaurants would affect the flavor of the foods served in those restaurants. It isn't possible for this to be true. He's lying through his teeth.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>&ldquo;I think salt should be banned in restaurants. I ask if a dish has salt in it, and if I does, I get something else that doesn&rsquo;t have salt,&rdquo; Ortiz tells me, before going on to say that he has eaten, and expects he will continue to eat, among other things, ham, cheese and bread in restaurants, all of which contain salt.</p></div><p>So what he's saying is that he has found a way to satisfy his desire not to have salt in foods that works within the current set of rights and regulations. He doesn't want salt, and he doesn't get salt.</p><p>Perfect! It looks like he has found a workable solution to his personal conviction that salt is bad. I would expect other grown adults to be fully capable of arriving at their own opinions of the substance, and, if similar, take similar steps. Welcome to America<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... where you can make your own lifestyle work for you without legislating that everyone else must adopt it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ortiz admits that prior to introducing the bill he did not research salt 's role in food chemistry , its effect on flavor or his bill 's ramifications for the restaurant industry .
He tells me he was prompted to introduce the bill because his father used salt excessively for many years , developed high blood pressure and had a heart attack.Emphasis mine .
According to this statement , Oritz says that he did not consider that banning salt in restaurants would affect the flavor of the foods served in those restaurants .
It is n't possible for this to be true .
He 's lying through his teeth.    I think salt should be banned in restaurants .
I ask if a dish has salt in it , and if I does , I get something else that doesn    t have salt ,    Ortiz tells me , before going on to say that he has eaten , and expects he will continue to eat , among other things , ham , cheese and bread in restaurants , all of which contain salt.So what he 's saying is that he has found a way to satisfy his desire not to have salt in foods that works within the current set of rights and regulations .
He does n't want salt , and he does n't get salt.Perfect !
It looks like he has found a workable solution to his personal conviction that salt is bad .
I would expect other grown adults to be fully capable of arriving at their own opinions of the substance , and , if similar , take similar steps .
Welcome to America ... where you can make your own lifestyle work for you without legislating that everyone else must adopt it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ortiz admits that prior to introducing the bill he did not research salt's role in food chemistry, its effect on flavor or his bill's ramifications for the restaurant industry.
He tells me he was prompted to introduce the bill because his father used salt excessively for many years, developed high blood pressure and had a heart attack.Emphasis mine.
According to this statement, Oritz says that he did not consider that banning salt in restaurants would affect the flavor of the foods served in those restaurants.
It isn't possible for this to be true.
He's lying through his teeth.“I think salt should be banned in restaurants.
I ask if a dish has salt in it, and if I does, I get something else that doesn’t have salt,” Ortiz tells me, before going on to say that he has eaten, and expects he will continue to eat, among other things, ham, cheese and bread in restaurants, all of which contain salt.So what he's saying is that he has found a way to satisfy his desire not to have salt in foods that works within the current set of rights and regulations.
He doesn't want salt, and he doesn't get salt.Perfect!
It looks like he has found a workable solution to his personal conviction that salt is bad.
I would expect other grown adults to be fully capable of arriving at their own opinions of the substance, and, if similar, take similar steps.
Welcome to America ... where you can make your own lifestyle work for you without legislating that everyone else must adopt it.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444260</id>
	<title>Re:Go go Nanny State...</title>
	<author>EastCoastSurfer</author>
	<datestamp>1268301900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I for one thank god that we have a government who views its job as to protect us the citizens from the people who would poison us to make a quick buck and I hope they do more to reign in corporate profits over public health.</p></div></blockquote><p>Hmm...are you talking about the same government that purposely poisoned it's own citizens during prohibition?  Or is it that same government that spies on its own people without warrants in order to protect them?</p><p>No matter what people think, the government has more power than any corporation can ever hope to have.  They are the only ones who can come into your house and take anything and everything at gun point and leave you with zero recourse.  Google all the eminent domain cases where the local government took houses in order to give the land to shopping malls or where they simply took peoples cash under the guise that it's drug money.  Need I go on?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one thank god that we have a government who views its job as to protect us the citizens from the people who would poison us to make a quick buck and I hope they do more to reign in corporate profits over public health.Hmm...are you talking about the same government that purposely poisoned it 's own citizens during prohibition ?
Or is it that same government that spies on its own people without warrants in order to protect them ? No matter what people think , the government has more power than any corporation can ever hope to have .
They are the only ones who can come into your house and take anything and everything at gun point and leave you with zero recourse .
Google all the eminent domain cases where the local government took houses in order to give the land to shopping malls or where they simply took peoples cash under the guise that it 's drug money .
Need I go on ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one thank god that we have a government who views its job as to protect us the citizens from the people who would poison us to make a quick buck and I hope they do more to reign in corporate profits over public health.Hmm...are you talking about the same government that purposely poisoned it's own citizens during prohibition?
Or is it that same government that spies on its own people without warrants in order to protect them?No matter what people think, the government has more power than any corporation can ever hope to have.
They are the only ones who can come into your house and take anything and everything at gun point and leave you with zero recourse.
Google all the eminent domain cases where the local government took houses in order to give the land to shopping malls or where they simply took peoples cash under the guise that it's drug money.
Need I go on?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31449912</id>
	<title>undoing mis-clicked mod</title>
	<author>ImNotAtWork</author>
	<datestamp>1268394960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>please ignore</htmltext>
<tokenext>please ignore</tokentext>
<sentencetext>please ignore</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442184</id>
	<title>So what else is new</title>
	<author>jimbobborg</author>
	<datestamp>1268339340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Felix Ortiz, D-Brooklyn.  Surprise!  A Democrat from Brooklyn wanting more regulations.  But wait, this time for food!  Next they're banning sugar and caffeine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Felix Ortiz , D-Brooklyn .
Surprise ! A Democrat from Brooklyn wanting more regulations .
But wait , this time for food !
Next they 're banning sugar and caffeine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Felix Ortiz, D-Brooklyn.
Surprise!  A Democrat from Brooklyn wanting more regulations.
But wait, this time for food!
Next they're banning sugar and caffeine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447728</id>
	<title>Iodized salt?</title>
	<author>Chewbacon</author>
	<datestamp>1268319000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...it contains iodine, a nutrient we all need.  Get rid of sea salt, which despite popular layman beliefs is not healthier for you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...it contains iodine , a nutrient we all need .
Get rid of sea salt , which despite popular layman beliefs is not healthier for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...it contains iodine, a nutrient we all need.
Get rid of sea salt, which despite popular layman beliefs is not healthier for you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445096</id>
	<title>Why not?</title>
	<author>mangu</author>
	<datestamp>1268304900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Thank god his father didn't pass away while having sex!</p></div></blockquote><p>I think it would be better for all of us if his father had passed away <b>before ejaculation</b> during the sexual intercourse that generated Felix Ortiz, D-Brooklyn.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank god his father did n't pass away while having sex ! I think it would be better for all of us if his father had passed away before ejaculation during the sexual intercourse that generated Felix Ortiz , D-Brooklyn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank god his father didn't pass away while having sex!I think it would be better for all of us if his father had passed away before ejaculation during the sexual intercourse that generated Felix Ortiz, D-Brooklyn.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446848</id>
	<title>Re:Some people are idiots</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1268312880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Simple. Because it shows dominance, and not playing by the rules of others. And that is what these types jack off to, and do it all for, at the end of the day.</p><p>It&rsquo;s only illogical, if you still think they&rsquo;d work for <em>us</em>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Simple .
Because it shows dominance , and not playing by the rules of others .
And that is what these types jack off to , and do it all for , at the end of the day.It    s only illogical , if you still think they    d work for us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Simple.
Because it shows dominance, and not playing by the rules of others.
And that is what these types jack off to, and do it all for, at the end of the day.It’s only illogical, if you still think they’d work for us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31453872</id>
	<title>Re:Bad ideas last forever</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268420040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They've already <i>assaulted</i> baked goods</p><p>Haha!  ISWYDT... clever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 've already assaulted baked goodsHaha !
ISWYDT... clever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They've already assaulted baked goodsHaha!
ISWYDT... clever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446338</id>
	<title>That sounds familiar...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268310180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Demolition man anyone?</p><p>from:<br>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demolition\_Man\_\%28film\%29</p><p>It is explained that anything "not good for you" is deemed "bad" and therefore illegal, including alcohol, caffeine, contact sports, non-educational toys, meat, spicy and unhealthy food, <b>table salt</b> and tobacco.</p><p>since the movie also says that Arnold Swatsneger was elected president, i cant say that sounded quite stunning.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Demolition man anyone ? from : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demolition \ _Man \ _ \ % 28film \ % 29It is explained that anything " not good for you " is deemed " bad " and therefore illegal , including alcohol , caffeine , contact sports , non-educational toys , meat , spicy and unhealthy food , table salt and tobacco.since the movie also says that Arnold Swatsneger was elected president , i cant say that sounded quite stunning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Demolition man anyone?from:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demolition\_Man\_\%28film\%29It is explained that anything "not good for you" is deemed "bad" and therefore illegal, including alcohol, caffeine, contact sports, non-educational toys, meat, spicy and unhealthy food, table salt and tobacco.since the movie also says that Arnold Swatsneger was elected president, i cant say that sounded quite stunning.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442352</id>
	<title>Something has to be done...</title>
	<author>cowtamer</author>
	<datestamp>1268339700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But this isn't that something.</p><p>Perhaps this article is a good analogue to illustrate what happens when technologically illiterate lawmakers propose technology legislation.</p><p>It's true that it is IMPOSSIBLE to eat a low sodium diet if you're eating out without severely restricting what you consume (if you disagree, I'd love to hear which items worked for you besides lettuce and hard-boiled eggs).</p><p>It's also near impossible to eat even a regular sodium diet if you eat out a lot, like I do.</p><p>Perhaps there needs to be some law to require *LARGE* restaurants to offer a low-sodium (but not salt free) option for maybe 10\% of their menu items, or to regulate the sodium in a single portion to less than a day's recommended allowance (a lot of current dishes will fail).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But this is n't that something.Perhaps this article is a good analogue to illustrate what happens when technologically illiterate lawmakers propose technology legislation.It 's true that it is IMPOSSIBLE to eat a low sodium diet if you 're eating out without severely restricting what you consume ( if you disagree , I 'd love to hear which items worked for you besides lettuce and hard-boiled eggs ) .It 's also near impossible to eat even a regular sodium diet if you eat out a lot , like I do.Perhaps there needs to be some law to require * LARGE * restaurants to offer a low-sodium ( but not salt free ) option for maybe 10 \ % of their menu items , or to regulate the sodium in a single portion to less than a day 's recommended allowance ( a lot of current dishes will fail ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But this isn't that something.Perhaps this article is a good analogue to illustrate what happens when technologically illiterate lawmakers propose technology legislation.It's true that it is IMPOSSIBLE to eat a low sodium diet if you're eating out without severely restricting what you consume (if you disagree, I'd love to hear which items worked for you besides lettuce and hard-boiled eggs).It's also near impossible to eat even a regular sodium diet if you eat out a lot, like I do.Perhaps there needs to be some law to require *LARGE* restaurants to offer a low-sodium (but not salt free) option for maybe 10\% of their menu items, or to regulate the sodium in a single portion to less than a day's recommended allowance (a lot of current dishes will fail).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443196</id>
	<title>Re:Go go Nanny State...</title>
	<author>steve buttgereit</author>
	<datestamp>1268298840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...you kook..."</p><p>Based on the rest of your post: pot calling kettle black.</p><p>For the record I'll take the "knee-jerk libertarian craziness" any day over "overzealous control freaks that can neither make their own choices without a bureaucrat in tow and can't seem to mind their own damn business in all other matters" such as yourself.</p><p>As for the "libertarian kook", keep it coming here on Slashdot.  Don't ever allow someone to tell you how to live your life, what you should and should not say, or presume they speak for others when in fact they only look down on others.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...you kook... " Based on the rest of your post : pot calling kettle black.For the record I 'll take the " knee-jerk libertarian craziness " any day over " overzealous control freaks that can neither make their own choices without a bureaucrat in tow and ca n't seem to mind their own damn business in all other matters " such as yourself.As for the " libertarian kook " , keep it coming here on Slashdot .
Do n't ever allow someone to tell you how to live your life , what you should and should not say , or presume they speak for others when in fact they only look down on others .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...you kook..."Based on the rest of your post: pot calling kettle black.For the record I'll take the "knee-jerk libertarian craziness" any day over "overzealous control freaks that can neither make their own choices without a bureaucrat in tow and can't seem to mind their own damn business in all other matters" such as yourself.As for the "libertarian kook", keep it coming here on Slashdot.
Don't ever allow someone to tell you how to live your life, what you should and should not say, or presume they speak for others when in fact they only look down on others.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448060</id>
	<title>Re:Go go Nanny State...</title>
	<author>Xyrus</author>
	<datestamp>1268321580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While I agree that the proposed legislation is stupid, McDonald's is usually cheaper than buying produce in a lot of areas.</p><p>Cheap beats healthy when you don't have a lot of cash.</p><p>~X~</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While I agree that the proposed legislation is stupid , McDonald 's is usually cheaper than buying produce in a lot of areas.Cheap beats healthy when you do n't have a lot of cash. ~ X ~</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I agree that the proposed legislation is stupid, McDonald's is usually cheaper than buying produce in a lot of areas.Cheap beats healthy when you don't have a lot of cash.~X~</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442194</id>
	<title>Fail</title>
	<author>TubeSteak</author>
	<datestamp>1268339340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ortiz admits that prior to introducing the bill he did not research salt's role in food chemistry, its effect on flavor or his bill's ramifications for the restaurant industry. He tells me he was prompted to introduce the bill because his father used salt excessively for many years, developed high blood pressure and had a heart attack.</p></div><p>Reacting emotionally is how bad laws get written and passed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ortiz admits that prior to introducing the bill he did not research salt 's role in food chemistry , its effect on flavor or his bill 's ramifications for the restaurant industry .
He tells me he was prompted to introduce the bill because his father used salt excessively for many years , developed high blood pressure and had a heart attack.Reacting emotionally is how bad laws get written and passed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ortiz admits that prior to introducing the bill he did not research salt's role in food chemistry, its effect on flavor or his bill's ramifications for the restaurant industry.
He tells me he was prompted to introduce the bill because his father used salt excessively for many years, developed high blood pressure and had a heart attack.Reacting emotionally is how bad laws get written and passed.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442456</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>Kiaser Zohsay</author>
	<datestamp>1268339940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Does the taste of salt remind him of his ex-lover?</p></div><p>I think I speak for everyone here when I say "Eewwwwww!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does the taste of salt remind him of his ex-lover ? I think I speak for everyone here when I say " Eewwwwww !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does the taste of salt remind him of his ex-lover?I think I speak for everyone here when I say "Eewwwwww!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447066</id>
	<title>If this guy wants to do something about health</title>
	<author>jonwil</author>
	<datestamp>1268314020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If this guy wants to do something about health, forget banning salt. They should ban the use of High Fructose Corn Syrup instead. There is a body of evidence that suggests that HFCS is worse for you (in terms of obesity) than sugar.</p><p>Banning it would also have the positive effect of making stuff taste better<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this guy wants to do something about health , forget banning salt .
They should ban the use of High Fructose Corn Syrup instead .
There is a body of evidence that suggests that HFCS is worse for you ( in terms of obesity ) than sugar.Banning it would also have the positive effect of making stuff taste better : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this guy wants to do something about health, forget banning salt.
They should ban the use of High Fructose Corn Syrup instead.
There is a body of evidence that suggests that HFCS is worse for you (in terms of obesity) than sugar.Banning it would also have the positive effect of making stuff taste better :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447554</id>
	<title>Re:Go go Nanny State...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268317380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The bottom line is that I should be able to eat <i>whatever I want</i> and it's none of your goddamn business.</p><p>You don't like what gets put into processed foods or restaurant foods?  Go buy your preferred items somewhere else.</p><p>I'll tell you what is completely kooky and moronic is the fact that this is likely to pass before a ban on cigarettes!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The bottom line is that I should be able to eat whatever I want and it 's none of your goddamn business.You do n't like what gets put into processed foods or restaurant foods ?
Go buy your preferred items somewhere else.I 'll tell you what is completely kooky and moronic is the fact that this is likely to pass before a ban on cigarettes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The bottom line is that I should be able to eat whatever I want and it's none of your goddamn business.You don't like what gets put into processed foods or restaurant foods?
Go buy your preferred items somewhere else.I'll tell you what is completely kooky and moronic is the fact that this is likely to pass before a ban on cigarettes!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448084</id>
	<title>Re:Too much salt?</title>
	<author>dfghjk</author>
	<datestamp>1268321940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently cranberries don't make you smart.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently cranberries do n't make you smart .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently cranberries don't make you smart.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442906</id>
	<title>Inevitable.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268298000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is inevitable. Not only will we see more of this, but it's going to get a lot more invasive. Politicians have decided it's their responsibility to look out for our well-being.</p><p>What does everyone think the president and congress is talking about when they say we need to change how we live, that we need to practice preventative healthcare? They're going to cram this sort of thing down our throats.</p><p>Every so often someone mentions us sacrificing our freedoms for the sake of security. But inevitably it's always mentioned in relation to the war on terrorism. The real threat to our freedom isn't anything so overt. Wars are temporary and there are plenty of people fighting these overt threats. The real threats to freedom is legislation like this. They're far more subtle, more far-reaching and long-lasting and it's the sort of thing that is harder to defend against because it's pretty easy to argue it's for our own good.</p><p>Twenty years from now people might be able to repeal invasive surveillance policies because the terrorist threat has subsided if not outright disappeared. But how do you repeal these kinds of bans? You're repealing a ban on something unhealthy! You're going to raise the cost of healthcare! We can't have that!</p><p>The real tool here should be education. People need to understand what they're consuming and the effects it may have on their bodies. Then they make the decision. But they should also be held responsible for their actions. Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be realistic in this day and age either. Now, I'm not so naive as to believe that we can have a complete libertarian free-for-all where anything goes. But I'm talking about basic personal freedoms here. Pig out on unhealthy food all your want, but be prepared to deal with the health issues you're likely to encounter later in life.</p><p>People want the freedom, but they don't want to deal with the responsibilities and consequences of those freedoms. It creates the perfect atmosphere for the government to step in and make these decisions for us. That's really what it comes down to. Either we live safe, secure lives free of major responsibilities but have to give up many of our freedoms, or we have our freedom but we have to deal directly with the consequences of our actions. Unfortunately too many people nowadays seem to have the delusion that we can enjoy the best of both worlds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is inevitable .
Not only will we see more of this , but it 's going to get a lot more invasive .
Politicians have decided it 's their responsibility to look out for our well-being.What does everyone think the president and congress is talking about when they say we need to change how we live , that we need to practice preventative healthcare ?
They 're going to cram this sort of thing down our throats.Every so often someone mentions us sacrificing our freedoms for the sake of security .
But inevitably it 's always mentioned in relation to the war on terrorism .
The real threat to our freedom is n't anything so overt .
Wars are temporary and there are plenty of people fighting these overt threats .
The real threats to freedom is legislation like this .
They 're far more subtle , more far-reaching and long-lasting and it 's the sort of thing that is harder to defend against because it 's pretty easy to argue it 's for our own good.Twenty years from now people might be able to repeal invasive surveillance policies because the terrorist threat has subsided if not outright disappeared .
But how do you repeal these kinds of bans ?
You 're repealing a ban on something unhealthy !
You 're going to raise the cost of healthcare !
We ca n't have that ! The real tool here should be education .
People need to understand what they 're consuming and the effects it may have on their bodies .
Then they make the decision .
But they should also be held responsible for their actions .
Unfortunately , that does n't seem to be realistic in this day and age either .
Now , I 'm not so naive as to believe that we can have a complete libertarian free-for-all where anything goes .
But I 'm talking about basic personal freedoms here .
Pig out on unhealthy food all your want , but be prepared to deal with the health issues you 're likely to encounter later in life.People want the freedom , but they do n't want to deal with the responsibilities and consequences of those freedoms .
It creates the perfect atmosphere for the government to step in and make these decisions for us .
That 's really what it comes down to .
Either we live safe , secure lives free of major responsibilities but have to give up many of our freedoms , or we have our freedom but we have to deal directly with the consequences of our actions .
Unfortunately too many people nowadays seem to have the delusion that we can enjoy the best of both worlds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is inevitable.
Not only will we see more of this, but it's going to get a lot more invasive.
Politicians have decided it's their responsibility to look out for our well-being.What does everyone think the president and congress is talking about when they say we need to change how we live, that we need to practice preventative healthcare?
They're going to cram this sort of thing down our throats.Every so often someone mentions us sacrificing our freedoms for the sake of security.
But inevitably it's always mentioned in relation to the war on terrorism.
The real threat to our freedom isn't anything so overt.
Wars are temporary and there are plenty of people fighting these overt threats.
The real threats to freedom is legislation like this.
They're far more subtle, more far-reaching and long-lasting and it's the sort of thing that is harder to defend against because it's pretty easy to argue it's for our own good.Twenty years from now people might be able to repeal invasive surveillance policies because the terrorist threat has subsided if not outright disappeared.
But how do you repeal these kinds of bans?
You're repealing a ban on something unhealthy!
You're going to raise the cost of healthcare!
We can't have that!The real tool here should be education.
People need to understand what they're consuming and the effects it may have on their bodies.
Then they make the decision.
But they should also be held responsible for their actions.
Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be realistic in this day and age either.
Now, I'm not so naive as to believe that we can have a complete libertarian free-for-all where anything goes.
But I'm talking about basic personal freedoms here.
Pig out on unhealthy food all your want, but be prepared to deal with the health issues you're likely to encounter later in life.People want the freedom, but they don't want to deal with the responsibilities and consequences of those freedoms.
It creates the perfect atmosphere for the government to step in and make these decisions for us.
That's really what it comes down to.
Either we live safe, secure lives free of major responsibilities but have to give up many of our freedoms, or we have our freedom but we have to deal directly with the consequences of our actions.
Unfortunately too many people nowadays seem to have the delusion that we can enjoy the best of both worlds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443840</id>
	<title>Re:Fail</title>
	<author>Utoxin</author>
	<datestamp>1268300700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's the wording from the bill:</p><p>No owner or operator of a restaurant in this state shall use salt in any form in the preparation of any food for consumption by customers of such restaurant, including food prepared to be consumed on the premises of such restaurant or off of such premises.</p><p>Seems pretty clear to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's the wording from the bill : No owner or operator of a restaurant in this state shall use salt in any form in the preparation of any food for consumption by customers of such restaurant , including food prepared to be consumed on the premises of such restaurant or off of such premises.Seems pretty clear to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's the wording from the bill:No owner or operator of a restaurant in this state shall use salt in any form in the preparation of any food for consumption by customers of such restaurant, including food prepared to be consumed on the premises of such restaurant or off of such premises.Seems pretty clear to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444370</id>
	<title>Re:Salt really isn't all that bad...</title>
	<author>Fnkmaster</author>
	<datestamp>1268302320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree with most of what you are saying, but a minor point - I don't think the reduction in carbohydrate intake directly impacted your blood pressure (it clearly did impact blood glucose and triglycerides, and I'm guessing cholesterol too since I've seen a similar effect when I cut out refined carbs).  I think it led to the drastic weight loss you describe, which was the primary factor in lowering your blood pressure.</p><p>Just my best guess though, since I'm not aware of a direct link between carbohydrate metabolism and blood pressure, other than as mediated through weight.  If I'm wrong, please correct me.</p><p>But in general, yeah, the link between salt and blood pressure is way overplayed, just like the link between fat intake and cholesterol levels, or weight gain.  And a much lower refined carbohydrate diet than the American norm is a good thing for basically everybody, especially overweight people or those with diabetes or metabolic syndrome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree with most of what you are saying , but a minor point - I do n't think the reduction in carbohydrate intake directly impacted your blood pressure ( it clearly did impact blood glucose and triglycerides , and I 'm guessing cholesterol too since I 've seen a similar effect when I cut out refined carbs ) .
I think it led to the drastic weight loss you describe , which was the primary factor in lowering your blood pressure.Just my best guess though , since I 'm not aware of a direct link between carbohydrate metabolism and blood pressure , other than as mediated through weight .
If I 'm wrong , please correct me.But in general , yeah , the link between salt and blood pressure is way overplayed , just like the link between fat intake and cholesterol levels , or weight gain .
And a much lower refined carbohydrate diet than the American norm is a good thing for basically everybody , especially overweight people or those with diabetes or metabolic syndrome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree with most of what you are saying, but a minor point - I don't think the reduction in carbohydrate intake directly impacted your blood pressure (it clearly did impact blood glucose and triglycerides, and I'm guessing cholesterol too since I've seen a similar effect when I cut out refined carbs).
I think it led to the drastic weight loss you describe, which was the primary factor in lowering your blood pressure.Just my best guess though, since I'm not aware of a direct link between carbohydrate metabolism and blood pressure, other than as mediated through weight.
If I'm wrong, please correct me.But in general, yeah, the link between salt and blood pressure is way overplayed, just like the link between fat intake and cholesterol levels, or weight gain.
And a much lower refined carbohydrate diet than the American norm is a good thing for basically everybody, especially overweight people or those with diabetes or metabolic syndrome.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443452</id>
	<title>Re:Bad ideas last forever</title>
	<author>vijayiyer</author>
	<datestamp>1268299500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Butter and lard make for much tastier baked goods than ones made with vegetable shortening. But your point is taken nevertheless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Butter and lard make for much tastier baked goods than ones made with vegetable shortening .
But your point is taken nevertheless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Butter and lard make for much tastier baked goods than ones made with vegetable shortening.
But your point is taken nevertheless.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868</id>
	<title>Some people are idiots</title>
	<author>SoopahMan</author>
	<datestamp>1268304000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is banning the solution to everything? I don't get it. People love to ban anything with legislation, it's completely illogical.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is banning the solution to everything ?
I do n't get it .
People love to ban anything with legislation , it 's completely illogical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is banning the solution to everything?
I don't get it.
People love to ban anything with legislation, it's completely illogical.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442748</id>
	<title>Re:What's going on.</title>
	<author>Ephemeriis</author>
	<datestamp>1268340780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In Louisville KY, the city is considering banning trans fat in restaurants.  This just seems crazy.</p></div><p>Good.</p><p>Trans-fat is horrible, nasty, awful stuff.  The only reason to use trans-fat instead of good ol' animal fat is price.  Trans-fat is cheaper to use.  It's also absolutely horrible for your body.</p><p>Any recipe you're making with trans-fat now can easily be modified to use good ol' regular fats and shortenings.  There is literally <b>no need</b> for trans-fat in your diet.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In Louisville KY , the city is considering banning trans fat in restaurants .
This just seems crazy.Good.Trans-fat is horrible , nasty , awful stuff .
The only reason to use trans-fat instead of good ol ' animal fat is price .
Trans-fat is cheaper to use .
It 's also absolutely horrible for your body.Any recipe you 're making with trans-fat now can easily be modified to use good ol ' regular fats and shortenings .
There is literally no need for trans-fat in your diet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Louisville KY, the city is considering banning trans fat in restaurants.
This just seems crazy.Good.Trans-fat is horrible, nasty, awful stuff.
The only reason to use trans-fat instead of good ol' animal fat is price.
Trans-fat is cheaper to use.
It's also absolutely horrible for your body.Any recipe you're making with trans-fat now can easily be modified to use good ol' regular fats and shortenings.
There is literally no need for trans-fat in your diet.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442204</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31449230</id>
	<title>More Than Salt (A Fairy Tale)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268426160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Didn't Felix Ortiz read the fairy tales?
<p>
<a href="http://storywrite.com/story/48052" title="storywrite.com" rel="nofollow">"Father, I love you more than salt." She spoke simply, quietly.</a> [storywrite.com]<br>
More than salt? More than salt?! The king was displeased. He couldn't believe his daughter had compared him to something so common and coarse as salt. He was angry, thinking of all the gifts he'd lavished on her. Such was his rage that he banished her from the kingdom.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't Felix Ortiz read the fairy tales ?
" Father , I love you more than salt .
" She spoke simply , quietly .
[ storywrite.com ] More than salt ?
More than salt ? !
The king was displeased .
He could n't believe his daughter had compared him to something so common and coarse as salt .
He was angry , thinking of all the gifts he 'd lavished on her .
Such was his rage that he banished her from the kingdom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't Felix Ortiz read the fairy tales?
"Father, I love you more than salt.
" She spoke simply, quietly.
[storywrite.com]
More than salt?
More than salt?!
The king was displeased.
He couldn't believe his daughter had compared him to something so common and coarse as salt.
He was angry, thinking of all the gifts he'd lavished on her.
Such was his rage that he banished her from the kingdom.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444594</id>
	<title>Re:Bad ideas last forever</title>
	<author>Kohath</author>
	<datestamp>1268303100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>... (good ideas, on the other hand, get shelved and are never heard from again).</p></div><p>There are no good "ideas" in government.  The ones that seem good only seem that way because they're never enacted and you never get to see them corrupted.</p><p>The only idea worth talking about is for government to stop doing almost everything it does.</p><p>Everyone: mind your own business and stop trying to take your neighbor's money and control you neighbor's life.  If you think something needs doing, do it yourself.  If you think something needs to be paid for, pay for it yourself.  If you think someone needs help, help them yourself.  If you know "the right way" to live, live your life that way.  Leave the rest of us to live our lives our own way.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... ( good ideas , on the other hand , get shelved and are never heard from again ) .There are no good " ideas " in government .
The ones that seem good only seem that way because they 're never enacted and you never get to see them corrupted.The only idea worth talking about is for government to stop doing almost everything it does.Everyone : mind your own business and stop trying to take your neighbor 's money and control you neighbor 's life .
If you think something needs doing , do it yourself .
If you think something needs to be paid for , pay for it yourself .
If you think someone needs help , help them yourself .
If you know " the right way " to live , live your life that way .
Leave the rest of us to live our lives our own way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... (good ideas, on the other hand, get shelved and are never heard from again).There are no good "ideas" in government.
The ones that seem good only seem that way because they're never enacted and you never get to see them corrupted.The only idea worth talking about is for government to stop doing almost everything it does.Everyone: mind your own business and stop trying to take your neighbor's money and control you neighbor's life.
If you think something needs doing, do it yourself.
If you think something needs to be paid for, pay for it yourself.
If you think someone needs help, help them yourself.
If you know "the right way" to live, live your life that way.
Leave the rest of us to live our lives our own way.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442734</id>
	<title>Finally</title>
	<author>halfEvilTech</author>
	<datestamp>1268340720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank god for this bill.</p><p>When I was a yound boy I started doing salt. I figured yea its just salt right? Afterwards I moved on to cracked pepper and eventually later in life started experimenting with parsley, basil and oregeno. Before I knew it I was hooked on Thyme and garlic and I lost everything. My wife, my job, my kids, all gone. Even the dog ran away. No you will find me lurking on the school grounds giving away free herbs, knowing that once hooked they will never be the same. So please think of the children and avoid my culinary fate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank god for this bill.When I was a yound boy I started doing salt .
I figured yea its just salt right ?
Afterwards I moved on to cracked pepper and eventually later in life started experimenting with parsley , basil and oregeno .
Before I knew it I was hooked on Thyme and garlic and I lost everything .
My wife , my job , my kids , all gone .
Even the dog ran away .
No you will find me lurking on the school grounds giving away free herbs , knowing that once hooked they will never be the same .
So please think of the children and avoid my culinary fate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank god for this bill.When I was a yound boy I started doing salt.
I figured yea its just salt right?
Afterwards I moved on to cracked pepper and eventually later in life started experimenting with parsley, basil and oregeno.
Before I knew it I was hooked on Thyme and garlic and I lost everything.
My wife, my job, my kids, all gone.
Even the dog ran away.
No you will find me lurking on the school grounds giving away free herbs, knowing that once hooked they will never be the same.
So please think of the children and avoid my culinary fate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448170</id>
	<title>Re:Go go Nanny State...</title>
	<author>thatisscary</author>
	<datestamp>1268322780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah. Private industry would be happy to poison us. That way we would all be dead and they would have no more customers!.

Since most computer programmers refer to our "customers" as users, does that make us equivalent to drug dealers.

Your error is assuming that when the government legislation equals protection, as opposed to harm.

If you regulate what goes into foods, and force restaurants to work within dietary regulations, then you actual produce more McDonald's, who are able to work within a regulatory environment. All you have accomplished is to highen the cost of opening a hamburger joint, to compete with McDonald's.

Regulation serves as a barrier to entry for worthwhile competitors, and the process whereby regulators create regulations that serve vested interests, is called Regulatory Capture.  Yeah, they have terms for it, it is a quite widely understood process.

As for you. Idiot would do or Government Worker.  Sorry, I am repeating myself here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah .
Private industry would be happy to poison us .
That way we would all be dead and they would have no more customers ! .
Since most computer programmers refer to our " customers " as users , does that make us equivalent to drug dealers .
Your error is assuming that when the government legislation equals protection , as opposed to harm .
If you regulate what goes into foods , and force restaurants to work within dietary regulations , then you actual produce more McDonald 's , who are able to work within a regulatory environment .
All you have accomplished is to highen the cost of opening a hamburger joint , to compete with McDonald 's .
Regulation serves as a barrier to entry for worthwhile competitors , and the process whereby regulators create regulations that serve vested interests , is called Regulatory Capture .
Yeah , they have terms for it , it is a quite widely understood process .
As for you .
Idiot would do or Government Worker .
Sorry , I am repeating myself here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah.
Private industry would be happy to poison us.
That way we would all be dead and they would have no more customers!.
Since most computer programmers refer to our "customers" as users, does that make us equivalent to drug dealers.
Your error is assuming that when the government legislation equals protection, as opposed to harm.
If you regulate what goes into foods, and force restaurants to work within dietary regulations, then you actual produce more McDonald's, who are able to work within a regulatory environment.
All you have accomplished is to highen the cost of opening a hamburger joint, to compete with McDonald's.
Regulation serves as a barrier to entry for worthwhile competitors, and the process whereby regulators create regulations that serve vested interests, is called Regulatory Capture.
Yeah, they have terms for it, it is a quite widely understood process.
As for you.
Idiot would do or Government Worker.
Sorry, I am repeating myself here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31471686</id>
	<title>Please, no law needed, but consider these points</title>
	<author>zafo</author>
	<datestamp>1268576100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think banning added salt is logical or wanted, though I wish consumers would demand a more reasonable use of salt in restaurant food. That said, a couple of comments:

1) Salt is not a spice, it is a mineral. It does not enhance flavor, it adds its own unique flavor.

2) Yes, salt is necessary for us to survive, but you'll find that we get salt in almost everything we eat - enough for our needs without adding any.

Most Americans eat a lot of processed foods and, if they tracked their salt intake, will find that they have reached the maximum recommended daily allowance sometime early in their lunch. We, as a nation, eat entirely too much salt, and suffer high blood pressure and other maladies as a result.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think banning added salt is logical or wanted , though I wish consumers would demand a more reasonable use of salt in restaurant food .
That said , a couple of comments : 1 ) Salt is not a spice , it is a mineral .
It does not enhance flavor , it adds its own unique flavor .
2 ) Yes , salt is necessary for us to survive , but you 'll find that we get salt in almost everything we eat - enough for our needs without adding any .
Most Americans eat a lot of processed foods and , if they tracked their salt intake , will find that they have reached the maximum recommended daily allowance sometime early in their lunch .
We , as a nation , eat entirely too much salt , and suffer high blood pressure and other maladies as a result .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think banning added salt is logical or wanted, though I wish consumers would demand a more reasonable use of salt in restaurant food.
That said, a couple of comments:

1) Salt is not a spice, it is a mineral.
It does not enhance flavor, it adds its own unique flavor.
2) Yes, salt is necessary for us to survive, but you'll find that we get salt in almost everything we eat - enough for our needs without adding any.
Most Americans eat a lot of processed foods and, if they tracked their salt intake, will find that they have reached the maximum recommended daily allowance sometime early in their lunch.
We, as a nation, eat entirely too much salt, and suffer high blood pressure and other maladies as a result.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443874</id>
	<title>I have Meniere's syndrome and think this is bogus!</title>
	<author>number6x</author>
	<datestamp>1268300760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have Meniere's syndrome and think this is bogus! I have to carefully limit my salt so I don't build up pressure in my inner ear, so I take care to do so.

</p><p>If anyone else is concerned about limiting their salt intake, then they should limit their salt intake.

</p><p>Our elected officials think we are too stupid and too lazy to take responsibility for ourselves. Make sure you let every one of them know how you feel about their opinion of us come election time!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have Meniere 's syndrome and think this is bogus !
I have to carefully limit my salt so I do n't build up pressure in my inner ear , so I take care to do so .
If anyone else is concerned about limiting their salt intake , then they should limit their salt intake .
Our elected officials think we are too stupid and too lazy to take responsibility for ourselves .
Make sure you let every one of them know how you feel about their opinion of us come election time !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have Meniere's syndrome and think this is bogus!
I have to carefully limit my salt so I don't build up pressure in my inner ear, so I take care to do so.
If anyone else is concerned about limiting their salt intake, then they should limit their salt intake.
Our elected officials think we are too stupid and too lazy to take responsibility for ourselves.
Make sure you let every one of them know how you feel about their opinion of us come election time!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447664</id>
	<title>Another Horrible Summary</title>
	<author>Wannabe Code Monkey</author>
	<datestamp>1268318460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't get me wrong, the summary is accurate. Its crime is splicing together random sentences ripped directly from the article to try and form an original summary. A section from the article, in its full glory (&lt;b&gt; mine):</p><blockquote><div><p>In food scientist Shirley O. Corriher's "CookWise: The Hows and Whys of Successful Cooking," she writes that even the minimal salt used in baking -- as little as one-third of a teaspoon per cup of flour -- plays four crucial roles in the development of dough: <b>It enhances flavor, controls bacteria, slows yeast activity and strengthens dough by tightening gluten</b>.</p></div></blockquote><p>And the last two sentences of the summary:</p><blockquote><div><p> <b>Not only does salt enhance flavor, it controls bacteria, slows yeast activity and strengthens dough by tightening gluten</b>. Salt also inhibits the growth of microbes that spoil cheese.</p></div></blockquote><p>You can see that the poster or "editor" knew what they were doing because the beginning of the sentence was massaged extensively. And the next sentence was taken from an earlier part of the article. If you're going to restate the article in your own words, then do it <b>in your own words</b>. And if you're going to quote directly from the author, then make the quotes obvious, and <b>don't change his words</b>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't get me wrong , the summary is accurate .
Its crime is splicing together random sentences ripped directly from the article to try and form an original summary .
A section from the article , in its full glory ( mine ) : In food scientist Shirley O. Corriher 's " CookWise : The Hows and Whys of Successful Cooking , " she writes that even the minimal salt used in baking -- as little as one-third of a teaspoon per cup of flour -- plays four crucial roles in the development of dough : It enhances flavor , controls bacteria , slows yeast activity and strengthens dough by tightening gluten.And the last two sentences of the summary : Not only does salt enhance flavor , it controls bacteria , slows yeast activity and strengthens dough by tightening gluten .
Salt also inhibits the growth of microbes that spoil cheese.You can see that the poster or " editor " knew what they were doing because the beginning of the sentence was massaged extensively .
And the next sentence was taken from an earlier part of the article .
If you 're going to restate the article in your own words , then do it in your own words .
And if you 're going to quote directly from the author , then make the quotes obvious , and do n't change his words .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't get me wrong, the summary is accurate.
Its crime is splicing together random sentences ripped directly from the article to try and form an original summary.
A section from the article, in its full glory ( mine):In food scientist Shirley O. Corriher's "CookWise: The Hows and Whys of Successful Cooking," she writes that even the minimal salt used in baking -- as little as one-third of a teaspoon per cup of flour -- plays four crucial roles in the development of dough: It enhances flavor, controls bacteria, slows yeast activity and strengthens dough by tightening gluten.And the last two sentences of the summary: Not only does salt enhance flavor, it controls bacteria, slows yeast activity and strengthens dough by tightening gluten.
Salt also inhibits the growth of microbes that spoil cheese.You can see that the poster or "editor" knew what they were doing because the beginning of the sentence was massaged extensively.
And the next sentence was taken from an earlier part of the article.
If you're going to restate the article in your own words, then do it in your own words.
And if you're going to quote directly from the author, then make the quotes obvious, and don't change his words.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445556</id>
	<title>it's always the crazy DEMOCRATS</title>
	<author>BrowncoatJedi</author>
	<datestamp>1268306820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Always heads up their asses.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Always heads up their asses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Always heads up their asses.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447344</id>
	<title>Re:Thank god</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268315880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>did you here that Ortiz is gay and had an afair with 2 other men?<br>one had an 8 year old daughter and the other a wife neither know so far.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>did you here that Ortiz is gay and had an afair with 2 other men ? one had an 8 year old daughter and the other a wife neither know so far .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>did you here that Ortiz is gay and had an afair with 2 other men?one had an 8 year old daughter and the other a wife neither know so far.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442314</id>
	<title>It would make more sense to outlaw...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268339640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...whacko stupid politicians. If one proposes a stupid law, he gets a life sentence to a mental institution since he's clearly a danger to society.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...whacko stupid politicians .
If one proposes a stupid law , he gets a life sentence to a mental institution since he 's clearly a danger to society .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...whacko stupid politicians.
If one proposes a stupid law, he gets a life sentence to a mental institution since he's clearly a danger to society.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442998</id>
	<title>Outlaws</title>
	<author>IgnacioB</author>
	<datestamp>1268298240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Outlaw salt...and only outlaws will have salt.

Maybe we need a Constitutional amendment to protect the right to this mineral.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Outlaw salt...and only outlaws will have salt .
Maybe we need a Constitutional amendment to protect the right to this mineral .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Outlaw salt...and only outlaws will have salt.
Maybe we need a Constitutional amendment to protect the right to this mineral.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442222</id>
	<title>Idiot.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268339400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Salt is a vital nutrient.  I am a marathoner and a long distance biker.  If I don't get enough salt, I die.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyponatremia" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Literally.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Salt is a vital nutrient .
I am a marathoner and a long distance biker .
If I do n't get enough salt , I die .
Literally. [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Salt is a vital nutrient.
I am a marathoner and a long distance biker.
If I don't get enough salt, I die.
Literally. [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442232</id>
	<title>Racist.</title>
	<author>Mekkah</author>
	<datestamp>1268339400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Salt is white, clearly this is legislation in support of hate crimes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Salt is white , clearly this is legislation in support of hate crimes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Salt is white, clearly this is legislation in support of hate crimes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444796</id>
	<title>Re:Bad ideas last forever</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268303760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>(good ideas, on the other hand, get shelved and are never heard from again)</p></div></blockquote><p>I hear ya, bro.  Like that one time somebody suggested we let women and black people vote, and it was immediately forgotten about forever and it never happened.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>( good ideas , on the other hand , get shelved and are never heard from again ) I hear ya , bro .
Like that one time somebody suggested we let women and black people vote , and it was immediately forgotten about forever and it never happened .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(good ideas, on the other hand, get shelved and are never heard from again)I hear ya, bro.
Like that one time somebody suggested we let women and black people vote, and it was immediately forgotten about forever and it never happened.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444410</id>
	<title>Re:ummmmm.....</title>
	<author>Belial6</author>
	<datestamp>1268302440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He eats salt.  The restaurant staff just lies to him.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He eats salt .
The restaurant staff just lies to him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He eats salt.
The restaurant staff just lies to him.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446440</id>
	<title>It will never pass.</title>
	<author>flimflammer</author>
	<datestamp>1268310660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is not even remotely worth worrying about. This will never pass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is not even remotely worth worrying about .
This will never pass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is not even remotely worth worrying about.
This will never pass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446204</id>
	<title>Re:Some people are idiots</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268309340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess the *logic* answer would be to ban legislation?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess the * logic * answer would be to ban legislation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess the *logic* answer would be to ban legislation?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448046</id>
	<title>lolwut</title>
	<author>Noitatsidem</author>
	<datestamp>1268321460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Okay so let me get this straight, rather than regulating the maximum amount of salt you can put into food, this guy wants a straight up ban of it? I think I smell a genius.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay so let me get this straight , rather than regulating the maximum amount of salt you can put into food , this guy wants a straight up ban of it ?
I think I smell a genius .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay so let me get this straight, rather than regulating the maximum amount of salt you can put into food, this guy wants a straight up ban of it?
I think I smell a genius.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442596</id>
	<title>Just wondering</title>
	<author>rossdee</author>
	<datestamp>1268340420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does NY have a sales tax on restaurant meals. I wonder how much revenue they will lose with fewer people going out to dinner.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does NY have a sales tax on restaurant meals .
I wonder how much revenue they will lose with fewer people going out to dinner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does NY have a sales tax on restaurant meals.
I wonder how much revenue they will lose with fewer people going out to dinner.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442830</id>
	<title>Less Govt. Intervention, not more.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268341020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was having a similar discussion with my husband the other day when he was discussing how he wants some government regulation on those types of products that claim to provide male enhancement or are diet supplement pills that supposedly burn fat just because someone took the pill.  He feels that people should be able to trust what companies advertise.</p><p>I pointed out to him, that right now our leaders feel any regulation should always go to the extreme.  This is a prime example of going to the extreme.  This is what this representative is proposing, the extreme.</p><p>Without some salt in foods, food will not stay preserved as long, and many other bad things will take place.  This has the potential for increasing the cost of meals at restaurants because food will not last as long, which then means more deliveries or purchases will need to be made for a restaurant to keep up with the shortened lifetime of the food supply used to prepare the meals.  This increases our carbon footprint for all of these service industries to meet the new regulation.  And if this is only done in one area of the country or one state, now fast food places have to make separate batches of food for the consumers and if one batch is mistakenly sent to a No-Salt location, what are the ramifications then?  Would people sue the restaurant because, OMG, I just ate salt...?  Possibly, maybe even likely.</p><p>I completely agree, less salt is better, but an outright ban?  Ridiculous!  Regulations are in place by the FDA, correct?  If companies are not following the regulations in place already go after them.  Enforce existing rules and regulations first, and staff up to meet the needs of enforcement.  If after regulation it is found that changes need to be made, tweak the regulations.</p><p>We need less govt. intervention.  Govt. leave my food alone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was having a similar discussion with my husband the other day when he was discussing how he wants some government regulation on those types of products that claim to provide male enhancement or are diet supplement pills that supposedly burn fat just because someone took the pill .
He feels that people should be able to trust what companies advertise.I pointed out to him , that right now our leaders feel any regulation should always go to the extreme .
This is a prime example of going to the extreme .
This is what this representative is proposing , the extreme.Without some salt in foods , food will not stay preserved as long , and many other bad things will take place .
This has the potential for increasing the cost of meals at restaurants because food will not last as long , which then means more deliveries or purchases will need to be made for a restaurant to keep up with the shortened lifetime of the food supply used to prepare the meals .
This increases our carbon footprint for all of these service industries to meet the new regulation .
And if this is only done in one area of the country or one state , now fast food places have to make separate batches of food for the consumers and if one batch is mistakenly sent to a No-Salt location , what are the ramifications then ?
Would people sue the restaurant because , OMG , I just ate salt... ?
Possibly , maybe even likely.I completely agree , less salt is better , but an outright ban ?
Ridiculous ! Regulations are in place by the FDA , correct ?
If companies are not following the regulations in place already go after them .
Enforce existing rules and regulations first , and staff up to meet the needs of enforcement .
If after regulation it is found that changes need to be made , tweak the regulations.We need less govt .
intervention. Govt .
leave my food alone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was having a similar discussion with my husband the other day when he was discussing how he wants some government regulation on those types of products that claim to provide male enhancement or are diet supplement pills that supposedly burn fat just because someone took the pill.
He feels that people should be able to trust what companies advertise.I pointed out to him, that right now our leaders feel any regulation should always go to the extreme.
This is a prime example of going to the extreme.
This is what this representative is proposing, the extreme.Without some salt in foods, food will not stay preserved as long, and many other bad things will take place.
This has the potential for increasing the cost of meals at restaurants because food will not last as long, which then means more deliveries or purchases will need to be made for a restaurant to keep up with the shortened lifetime of the food supply used to prepare the meals.
This increases our carbon footprint for all of these service industries to meet the new regulation.
And if this is only done in one area of the country or one state, now fast food places have to make separate batches of food for the consumers and if one batch is mistakenly sent to a No-Salt location, what are the ramifications then?
Would people sue the restaurant because, OMG, I just ate salt...?
Possibly, maybe even likely.I completely agree, less salt is better, but an outright ban?
Ridiculous!  Regulations are in place by the FDA, correct?
If companies are not following the regulations in place already go after them.
Enforce existing rules and regulations first, and staff up to meet the needs of enforcement.
If after regulation it is found that changes need to be made, tweak the regulations.We need less govt.
intervention.  Govt.
leave my food alone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443300</id>
	<title>Re:This just in!</title>
	<author>Hairy1</author>
	<datestamp>1268299140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is that funny? Because the subject is food? I'm fat, and I don't have a problem with people calling me on it. However, in this context it is utterly irrelevant. Salt content has nothing to do with obesity. Is the suggestion here that being fat automatically disqualifies you from public comment?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is that funny ?
Because the subject is food ?
I 'm fat , and I do n't have a problem with people calling me on it .
However , in this context it is utterly irrelevant .
Salt content has nothing to do with obesity .
Is the suggestion here that being fat automatically disqualifies you from public comment ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is that funny?
Because the subject is food?
I'm fat, and I don't have a problem with people calling me on it.
However, in this context it is utterly irrelevant.
Salt content has nothing to do with obesity.
Is the suggestion here that being fat automatically disqualifies you from public comment?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442528</id>
	<title>Re:Bad ideas last forever</title>
	<author>Mordac</author>
	<datestamp>1268340240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shortening != Trans Fat.</p><p>You can go back and have cake, just don't put certain margarines and other artificial oils in it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shortening ! = Trans Fat.You can go back and have cake , just do n't put certain margarines and other artificial oils in it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shortening != Trans Fat.You can go back and have cake, just don't put certain margarines and other artificial oils in it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448374</id>
	<title>Re:So what else is new</title>
	<author>Kohath</author>
	<datestamp>1268325240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah!  These people are too dumb to make all our choices for us.  <i>We should elect <b>smart</b> people to make all our choices for us.</i></p><p>Or, how about we make all our own choices and take all the power away from government?  Then it doesn't matter whether the government people are smart or not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah !
These people are too dumb to make all our choices for us .
We should elect smart people to make all our choices for us.Or , how about we make all our own choices and take all the power away from government ?
Then it does n't matter whether the government people are smart or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah!
These people are too dumb to make all our choices for us.
We should elect smart people to make all our choices for us.Or, how about we make all our own choices and take all the power away from government?
Then it doesn't matter whether the government people are smart or not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443722</id>
	<title>This is a fluff bill</title>
	<author>whtdrgn101</author>
	<datestamp>1268300340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is just like all the other fluff bills out there.  Politicians want to create a reputation of being tuff on drugs, guns, health, etc.  So they introduce bills as rediculous as this so they can say they worked hard on whatever issue they are grandstanding about during election season.  This is just normal politics, it will get assigned to a comittee and then forgotten...</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is just like all the other fluff bills out there .
Politicians want to create a reputation of being tuff on drugs , guns , health , etc .
So they introduce bills as rediculous as this so they can say they worked hard on whatever issue they are grandstanding about during election season .
This is just normal politics , it will get assigned to a comittee and then forgotten.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is just like all the other fluff bills out there.
Politicians want to create a reputation of being tuff on drugs, guns, health, etc.
So they introduce bills as rediculous as this so they can say they worked hard on whatever issue they are grandstanding about during election season.
This is just normal politics, it will get assigned to a comittee and then forgotten...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444420</id>
	<title>Re:Too much salt?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268302500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Those problems are related to the fact that no one uses REAL salt anymore. That stuff that Mortons sells is an awful chemical that destroys your arteries. REAL sea salt is GOOD for you.</p></div><p>There is no difference in the "artery destroying" potential of "real" salt and table salt (which is refined).<br>"Sea salt and table salt have the same basic nutritional value &mdash; both mostly consist of two minerals &mdash; sodium and chloride. However, sea salt is often marketed as a more natural and healthy alternative. The real differences between sea salt and table salt are in their taste, texture and processing, not their chemical makeup." http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/sea-salt/AN01142<br>So this awful chemical just happens to be called Sodium Chloride and is present in both types of salt. You are full of crap.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those problems are related to the fact that no one uses REAL salt anymore .
That stuff that Mortons sells is an awful chemical that destroys your arteries .
REAL sea salt is GOOD for you.There is no difference in the " artery destroying " potential of " real " salt and table salt ( which is refined ) .
" Sea salt and table salt have the same basic nutritional value    both mostly consist of two minerals    sodium and chloride .
However , sea salt is often marketed as a more natural and healthy alternative .
The real differences between sea salt and table salt are in their taste , texture and processing , not their chemical makeup .
" http : //www.mayoclinic.com/health/sea-salt/AN01142So this awful chemical just happens to be called Sodium Chloride and is present in both types of salt .
You are full of crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those problems are related to the fact that no one uses REAL salt anymore.
That stuff that Mortons sells is an awful chemical that destroys your arteries.
REAL sea salt is GOOD for you.There is no difference in the "artery destroying" potential of "real" salt and table salt (which is refined).
"Sea salt and table salt have the same basic nutritional value — both mostly consist of two minerals — sodium and chloride.
However, sea salt is often marketed as a more natural and healthy alternative.
The real differences between sea salt and table salt are in their taste, texture and processing, not their chemical makeup.
" http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/sea-salt/AN01142So this awful chemical just happens to be called Sodium Chloride and is present in both types of salt.
You are full of crap.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448030</id>
	<title>Demolition Man</title>
	<author>John Marter</author>
	<datestamp>1268321280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Soon all restaurants will be Taco Bell.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Soon all restaurants will be Taco Bell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Soon all restaurants will be Taco Bell.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445722</id>
	<title>Re:So what else is new</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268307540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We don't elect smart people, we elect people crooked enough and desperate enough to do the job.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We do n't elect smart people , we elect people crooked enough and desperate enough to do the job .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We don't elect smart people, we elect people crooked enough and desperate enough to do the job.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442840</id>
	<title>Re:What's going on.</title>
	<author>Attila Dimedici</author>
	<datestamp>1268341020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In Louisville KY, the city is considering banning trans fat in restaurants.  This just seems crazy.</p></div><p>This has been done already in many cities (I think some states have gotten on the band wagon as well). I do not approve of trans fat bans, but they are categorically a different thing than salt bans. As far as I know, trans fat is not a necessary part of the diet as opposed to salt, which is.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In Louisville KY , the city is considering banning trans fat in restaurants .
This just seems crazy.This has been done already in many cities ( I think some states have gotten on the band wagon as well ) .
I do not approve of trans fat bans , but they are categorically a different thing than salt bans .
As far as I know , trans fat is not a necessary part of the diet as opposed to salt , which is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Louisville KY, the city is considering banning trans fat in restaurants.
This just seems crazy.This has been done already in many cities (I think some states have gotten on the band wagon as well).
I do not approve of trans fat bans, but they are categorically a different thing than salt bans.
As far as I know, trans fat is not a necessary part of the diet as opposed to salt, which is.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442204</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442538</id>
	<title>Re:Bad ideas last forever</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1268340240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The big advantage trans fats have over other fats is shelf life. Recipe changes should be able to compensate for any issues with texture (notice that Crisco still sells vegetable shortening, they just stopped using partially hydrogenated oils in it, so they can market it as having no trans fat in it).</p><p>And I'm pretty sure the occasional bad idea is repealed. There was a big one back in the 30s.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The big advantage trans fats have over other fats is shelf life .
Recipe changes should be able to compensate for any issues with texture ( notice that Crisco still sells vegetable shortening , they just stopped using partially hydrogenated oils in it , so they can market it as having no trans fat in it ) .And I 'm pretty sure the occasional bad idea is repealed .
There was a big one back in the 30s .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The big advantage trans fats have over other fats is shelf life.
Recipe changes should be able to compensate for any issues with texture (notice that Crisco still sells vegetable shortening, they just stopped using partially hydrogenated oils in it, so they can market it as having no trans fat in it).And I'm pretty sure the occasional bad idea is repealed.
There was a big one back in the 30s.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444940</id>
	<title>Re:What's going on.</title>
	<author>Lunix Nutcase</author>
	<datestamp>1268304300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you really want to make a difference in your health with respect to the food you eat stop being lazy and make your own food from scratch (not processed foods) and stop eating out.</p></div><p>You probably don't have this problem down in your parents basement, but some of us actually like to go out and spend time with friends and family.  This usually involves going to places that serve food.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you really want to make a difference in your health with respect to the food you eat stop being lazy and make your own food from scratch ( not processed foods ) and stop eating out.You probably do n't have this problem down in your parents basement , but some of us actually like to go out and spend time with friends and family .
This usually involves going to places that serve food .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you really want to make a difference in your health with respect to the food you eat stop being lazy and make your own food from scratch (not processed foods) and stop eating out.You probably don't have this problem down in your parents basement, but some of us actually like to go out and spend time with friends and family.
This usually involves going to places that serve food.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443890</id>
	<title>Re:Bye Bye New York Pizza</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1268300820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aaaaugh, I tried to dereference the footnote asterisk (salt*) and got hopelessly confused.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aaaaugh , I tried to dereference the footnote asterisk ( salt * ) and got hopelessly confused .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aaaaugh, I tried to dereference the footnote asterisk (salt*) and got hopelessly confused.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442652</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448066</id>
	<title>Re:Idiot.</title>
	<author>dfghjk</author>
	<datestamp>1268321760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've never heard a runner refer to himself as a marathoner nor a cyclist refer to himself as a biker.  Regardless, the suggested ban doesn't keep anyone from using sports drinks while exercising.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've never heard a runner refer to himself as a marathoner nor a cyclist refer to himself as a biker .
Regardless , the suggested ban does n't keep anyone from using sports drinks while exercising .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've never heard a runner refer to himself as a marathoner nor a cyclist refer to himself as a biker.
Regardless, the suggested ban doesn't keep anyone from using sports drinks while exercising.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448910</id>
	<title>Re:This just in!</title>
	<author>Jello B.</author>
	<datestamp>1268333700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not laughing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not laughing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not laughing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443424</id>
	<title>Re:Outlaws</title>
	<author>amiga3D</author>
	<datestamp>1268299440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about the 10th amendment?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about the 10th amendment ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about the 10th amendment?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442998</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442762</id>
	<title>Let him try it</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1268340840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I say he be placed on a diet entirely free of salt. His inevitable decline into insanity followed by death can be an example to others.</p><p>How much money is he going to waste on what has to be the year's dumbest legislation? Is it too much to ask that a legislator at least do SOME basic research before pulling a bill ouit of his ass?</p><p>I sincerely hope his opponant in the next election paints him as Assemblyman slug.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I say he be placed on a diet entirely free of salt .
His inevitable decline into insanity followed by death can be an example to others.How much money is he going to waste on what has to be the year 's dumbest legislation ?
Is it too much to ask that a legislator at least do SOME basic research before pulling a bill ouit of his ass ? I sincerely hope his opponant in the next election paints him as Assemblyman slug .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I say he be placed on a diet entirely free of salt.
His inevitable decline into insanity followed by death can be an example to others.How much money is he going to waste on what has to be the year's dumbest legislation?
Is it too much to ask that a legislator at least do SOME basic research before pulling a bill ouit of his ass?I sincerely hope his opponant in the next election paints him as Assemblyman slug.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108</id>
	<title>This just in!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268339100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some politicians are idiots! More at 11.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some politicians are idiots !
More at 11 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some politicians are idiots!
More at 11.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444892</id>
	<title>War on salt?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268304060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444576</id>
	<title>salt in baking doesnt inhibit anything</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268303040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>unless you're really stupid enough to think a pinch of salt could possibly have any effect on bacteria levels or yeast growth, dumbass</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>unless you 're really stupid enough to think a pinch of salt could possibly have any effect on bacteria levels or yeast growth , dumbass</tokentext>
<sentencetext>unless you're really stupid enough to think a pinch of salt could possibly have any effect on bacteria levels or yeast growth, dumbass</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444918</id>
	<title>Re:So what else is new</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268304120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>Eat recycled food. It's good for the environment and okay for you. </i></p> </div><p>You mean like vomit?  Or shit?  Just wondering.</p><p>--AC</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Eat recycled food .
It 's good for the environment and okay for you .
You mean like vomit ?
Or shit ?
Just wondering.--AC</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Eat recycled food.
It's good for the environment and okay for you.
You mean like vomit?
Or shit?
Just wondering.--AC
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446894</id>
	<title>Re:Nails are dangerous too...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268313120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would be better to have a law that prohibits to step on a nail. Especially while you are a kid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be better to have a law that prohibits to step on a nail .
Especially while you are a kid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be better to have a law that prohibits to step on a nail.
Especially while you are a kid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442772</id>
	<title>I cant wait until</title>
	<author>meow27</author>
	<datestamp>1268340840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>-they ban sugar in jam<br>- they ban sugar in all foods that need to be sweet by nature.(like jam)<br>- ban sugar in sodas<br>- ban flavoring in foods<br>- ban iodine in salt (its IS bad in high dosages!)<br>- ban certain plants that might have a little too much fatty acids<br>- ban eggs<br>- ban milk<br><br>the list goes on. but everybody knows this is totally absurd. this is not like smoking where the user is damaging the people around him. people come to restaurants in expectation of these ingredients. if they dont want salt, they should tell the chef or waiter that they want no salt.<br><br>worst of all, this assemblyman wrote the bill BEFORE even researching the effects of salt.</htmltext>
<tokenext>-they ban sugar in jam- they ban sugar in all foods that need to be sweet by nature .
( like jam ) - ban sugar in sodas- ban flavoring in foods- ban iodine in salt ( its IS bad in high dosages !
) - ban certain plants that might have a little too much fatty acids- ban eggs- ban milkthe list goes on .
but everybody knows this is totally absurd .
this is not like smoking where the user is damaging the people around him .
people come to restaurants in expectation of these ingredients .
if they dont want salt , they should tell the chef or waiter that they want no salt.worst of all , this assemblyman wrote the bill BEFORE even researching the effects of salt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>-they ban sugar in jam- they ban sugar in all foods that need to be sweet by nature.
(like jam)- ban sugar in sodas- ban flavoring in foods- ban iodine in salt (its IS bad in high dosages!
)- ban certain plants that might have a little too much fatty acids- ban eggs- ban milkthe list goes on.
but everybody knows this is totally absurd.
this is not like smoking where the user is damaging the people around him.
people come to restaurants in expectation of these ingredients.
if they dont want salt, they should tell the chef or waiter that they want no salt.worst of all, this assemblyman wrote the bill BEFORE even researching the effects of salt.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443186</id>
	<title>Re:Better food labeling would be a better law</title>
	<author>presidenteloco</author>
	<datestamp>1268298840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whoever modded this offtopic is a twit.</p><p>The general topic is ways of getting people to eat healthier.</p><p>-Banning certain foods is one way.</p><p>-Labelling foods in an easier to understand and notice way is another way</p><p>I'm saying the other way is more effective and sensible than the first way.</p><p>I'm comparing an alternative method to the proposed method which is the<br>topic of the article.</p><p>So back off, conversation-fascist!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whoever modded this offtopic is a twit.The general topic is ways of getting people to eat healthier.-Banning certain foods is one way.-Labelling foods in an easier to understand and notice way is another wayI 'm saying the other way is more effective and sensible than the first way.I 'm comparing an alternative method to the proposed method which is thetopic of the article.So back off , conversation-fascist !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whoever modded this offtopic is a twit.The general topic is ways of getting people to eat healthier.-Banning certain foods is one way.-Labelling foods in an easier to understand and notice way is another wayI'm saying the other way is more effective and sensible than the first way.I'm comparing an alternative method to the proposed method which is thetopic of the article.So back off, conversation-fascist!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442672</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442198</id>
	<title>Question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268339340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why does this guy hate salt so much? Did he have a bad experience with salt, possibly during his early childhood? Does the taste of salt remind him of his ex-lover? <br> <br>
I don't think he really appreciates what salt has done for humanity. It preserved our meat by preventing bacterial growth, flavored food when we had little access to other spices, and even served as currency in ancient times. It gave us handy little phrases like "take that with a grain of salt," and you can even use it to kill slugs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does this guy hate salt so much ?
Did he have a bad experience with salt , possibly during his early childhood ?
Does the taste of salt remind him of his ex-lover ?
I do n't think he really appreciates what salt has done for humanity .
It preserved our meat by preventing bacterial growth , flavored food when we had little access to other spices , and even served as currency in ancient times .
It gave us handy little phrases like " take that with a grain of salt , " and you can even use it to kill slugs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does this guy hate salt so much?
Did he have a bad experience with salt, possibly during his early childhood?
Does the taste of salt remind him of his ex-lover?
I don't think he really appreciates what salt has done for humanity.
It preserved our meat by preventing bacterial growth, flavored food when we had little access to other spices, and even served as currency in ancient times.
It gave us handy little phrases like "take that with a grain of salt," and you can even use it to kill slugs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445172</id>
	<title>Re:What's going on.</title>
	<author>jedidiah</author>
	<datestamp>1268305200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Trans fat is really nasty stuff. It is rather unlikely that there is enough additional saturated fat to counteract the benefit of removing the trans fat.</p><p>You really are better off with real lard than the fake kind.</p><p>Trying to fool mother nature doesn't really seem to pay off in the end.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Trans fat is really nasty stuff .
It is rather unlikely that there is enough additional saturated fat to counteract the benefit of removing the trans fat.You really are better off with real lard than the fake kind.Trying to fool mother nature does n't really seem to pay off in the end .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trans fat is really nasty stuff.
It is rather unlikely that there is enough additional saturated fat to counteract the benefit of removing the trans fat.You really are better off with real lard than the fake kind.Trying to fool mother nature doesn't really seem to pay off in the end.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443766</id>
	<title>Re:So what else is new</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1268300460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They're already working hard to push tax on "sugary" sodas and drinks in NY.</p><p>I love the loaded language. Sugary, like we're talking about a bottle full of sugar.</p></div><p>Um, really, it&rsquo;s not far off... a 12-oz. Coke has 39 grams of sugar. A 12-oz. (355 ml) bottle of plain water would weigh 355 grams. That&rsquo;s almost 10\% sugar by weight.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're already working hard to push tax on " sugary " sodas and drinks in NY.I love the loaded language .
Sugary , like we 're talking about a bottle full of sugar.Um , really , it    s not far off... a 12-oz .
Coke has 39 grams of sugar .
A 12-oz .
( 355 ml ) bottle of plain water would weigh 355 grams .
That    s almost 10 \ % sugar by weight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're already working hard to push tax on "sugary" sodas and drinks in NY.I love the loaded language.
Sugary, like we're talking about a bottle full of sugar.Um, really, it’s not far off... a 12-oz.
Coke has 39 grams of sugar.
A 12-oz.
(355 ml) bottle of plain water would weigh 355 grams.
That’s almost 10\% sugar by weight.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442298</id>
	<title>Re:What's going on.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268339580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Trans fats are an artificial substance that occur primarily due to anti-fat hysteria. In mindlessly fleeing from animal fats, we managed to create something 10 or 100 times worse.</p><p>In this respect, it's a little less absurd to try to ban it.</p><p>There should just be accurate labeling across the board.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Trans fats are an artificial substance that occur primarily due to anti-fat hysteria .
In mindlessly fleeing from animal fats , we managed to create something 10 or 100 times worse.In this respect , it 's a little less absurd to try to ban it.There should just be accurate labeling across the board .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trans fats are an artificial substance that occur primarily due to anti-fat hysteria.
In mindlessly fleeing from animal fats, we managed to create something 10 or 100 times worse.In this respect, it's a little less absurd to try to ban it.There should just be accurate labeling across the board.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442204</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442204</id>
	<title>What's going on.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268339340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Louisville KY, the city is considering banning trans fat in restaurants.  This just seems crazy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Louisville KY , the city is considering banning trans fat in restaurants .
This just seems crazy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Louisville KY, the city is considering banning trans fat in restaurants.
This just seems crazy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446830</id>
	<title>Re:Some people are idiots</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268312760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Solution: ban legislation!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Solution : ban legislation !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Solution: ban legislation!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442284</id>
	<title>Felix Ortiz, D-Brooklyn...</title>
	<author>ItsJustAPseudonym</author>
	<datestamp>1268339580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>...probably eats paste.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...probably eats paste .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...probably eats paste.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445100</id>
	<title>Re:Less Govt. Intervention, not more.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268304960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is that you Mary Matalin?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that you Mary Matalin ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that you Mary Matalin?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444768</id>
	<title>Re:but</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268303700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, it just makes my hash more valuable to the high school kids!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it just makes my hash more valuable to the high school kids !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it just makes my hash more valuable to the high school kids!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442180</id>
	<title>Stupidity</title>
	<author>XPeter</author>
	<datestamp>1268339280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He's from Brooklyn.  'Nuff said</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's from Brooklyn .
'Nuff said</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's from Brooklyn.
'Nuff said</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445526</id>
	<title>"by restaurants...by restaurants"</title>
	<author>Danny Rathjens</author>
	<datestamp>1268306700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Prohibits the use of salt by restaurants in the preparation of food by restaurants."<br>When they can't even form a proper sentence for the official summary of the bill you know these aren't the brightest minds in the world.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Prohibits the use of salt by restaurants in the preparation of food by restaurants .
" When they ca n't even form a proper sentence for the official summary of the bill you know these are n't the brightest minds in the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Prohibits the use of salt by restaurants in the preparation of food by restaurants.
"When they can't even form a proper sentence for the official summary of the bill you know these aren't the brightest minds in the world.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443966</id>
	<title>Demolition Man</title>
	<author>DaFallus</author>
	<datestamp>1268301000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Salt is not good for you. Anything not good for you is bad, hence, illegal. Alcohol, caffeine, contact sports, red meat...bad language, child play, gasoline, uneducational toys, and anything spicy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Salt is not good for you .
Anything not good for you is bad , hence , illegal .
Alcohol , caffeine , contact sports , red meat...bad language , child play , gasoline , uneducational toys , and anything spicy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Salt is not good for you.
Anything not good for you is bad, hence, illegal.
Alcohol, caffeine, contact sports, red meat...bad language, child play, gasoline, uneducational toys, and anything spicy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446526</id>
	<title>Absurd. Ban Iodized Salt, fine and keep sea salt.</title>
	<author>tyrione</author>
	<datestamp>1268311080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Get rid of Iodized salt. End of story.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Get rid of Iodized salt .
End of story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get rid of Iodized salt.
End of story.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442542</id>
	<title>Re:ummmmm.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268340240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn't need to be "salts of one type or another"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. the answer is that he eats vegetables. Raw, steamed, blanched, grilled.. whatever. But they'll be bland. Salad with a dressing? Nope. Sorry, no butter either. Sauce? That won't fly. Meats are right out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't need to be " salts of one type or another " .. the answer is that he eats vegetables .
Raw , steamed , blanched , grilled.. whatever. But they 'll be bland .
Salad with a dressing ?
Nope. Sorry , no butter either .
Sauce ? That wo n't fly .
Meats are right out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't need to be "salts of one type or another" .. the answer is that he eats vegetables.
Raw, steamed, blanched, grilled.. whatever. But they'll be bland.
Salad with a dressing?
Nope. Sorry, no butter either.
Sauce? That won't fly.
Meats are right out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442228</id>
	<title>This is SAD.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268339400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is so stupid. Normally, I'd have something constructive to add, but this is just too dumb. Maybe they'll ban black pepper next...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is so stupid .
Normally , I 'd have something constructive to add , but this is just too dumb .
Maybe they 'll ban black pepper next.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is so stupid.
Normally, I'd have something constructive to add, but this is just too dumb.
Maybe they'll ban black pepper next...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445536</id>
	<title>Wait what!?</title>
	<author>Windwraith</author>
	<datestamp>1268306700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suffered a collapse recently, not a pleasant thing.<br>My medic told me it was a lack of sodium in my blood that made me weak, so I had to force some more salt into my meals. And haven't had a problem since then.<br>We need our sodium, present in salt, as mostly everyone points out in comments. Politicians get more and more retarded every day.<br>They make wars, they take away freedom...they cause  way more *direct* and *tangible* pain than any "witch" they want to "hunt".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suffered a collapse recently , not a pleasant thing.My medic told me it was a lack of sodium in my blood that made me weak , so I had to force some more salt into my meals .
And have n't had a problem since then.We need our sodium , present in salt , as mostly everyone points out in comments .
Politicians get more and more retarded every day.They make wars , they take away freedom...they cause way more * direct * and * tangible * pain than any " witch " they want to " hunt " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suffered a collapse recently, not a pleasant thing.My medic told me it was a lack of sodium in my blood that made me weak, so I had to force some more salt into my meals.
And haven't had a problem since then.We need our sodium, present in salt, as mostly everyone points out in comments.
Politicians get more and more retarded every day.They make wars, they take away freedom...they cause  way more *direct* and *tangible* pain than any "witch" they want to "hunt".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443694</id>
	<title>Re:but</title>
	<author>digitalhermit</author>
	<datestamp>1268300220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>but if there's no salt for your hash, doesn't that make your clients and servers less secure?</i></p><p>Only if your server hasn't washed his hands before a handshake.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but if there 's no salt for your hash , does n't that make your clients and servers less secure ? Only if your server has n't washed his hands before a handshake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but if there's no salt for your hash, doesn't that make your clients and servers less secure?Only if your server hasn't washed his hands before a handshake.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31450044</id>
	<title>OK then, how do you stop restaurants ....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268397960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... loading with salt their offerings?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... loading with salt their offerings ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... loading with salt their offerings?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445020</id>
	<title>Re:Fail</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268304600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"[Ortiz] He tells me he was prompted to introduce the bill because his father used salt excessively for many years, developed high blood pressure and had a heart attack."</p><p>Um.  What next?  Someone who drinks too much water and developed hyponatremia, thus ban <i>water</i> in food?</p><p>I could see if he was talking about blowfish poison or something, but salt?  It's ridiculous.  We <i>need</i> salt in our diet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" [ Ortiz ] He tells me he was prompted to introduce the bill because his father used salt excessively for many years , developed high blood pressure and had a heart attack. " Um .
What next ?
Someone who drinks too much water and developed hyponatremia , thus ban water in food ? I could see if he was talking about blowfish poison or something , but salt ?
It 's ridiculous .
We need salt in our diet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"[Ortiz] He tells me he was prompted to introduce the bill because his father used salt excessively for many years, developed high blood pressure and had a heart attack."Um.
What next?
Someone who drinks too much water and developed hyponatremia, thus ban water in food?I could see if he was talking about blowfish poison or something, but salt?
It's ridiculous.
We need salt in our diet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443612</id>
	<title>Be well!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268299980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And no one has said "Be well, John Spartan." yet?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And no one has said " Be well , John Spartan .
" yet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And no one has said "Be well, John Spartan.
" yet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442190</id>
	<title>More Important Things</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268339340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't politicians have more important things to deal with?<br> <br>
I know. I know. I must be new to, well, western civilization...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't politicians have more important things to deal with ?
I know .
I know .
I must be new to , well , western civilization.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't politicians have more important things to deal with?
I know.
I know.
I must be new to, well, western civilization...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444854</id>
	<title>Re:Bad ideas last forever</title>
	<author>jeff4747</author>
	<datestamp>1268303940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>They've already assaulted baked goods by banning trans-fats (certain baked goods need shortening for texture)</p></div></blockquote><p>Shortening (aka lard) is a saturated fat.  It is not a trans fat.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 've already assaulted baked goods by banning trans-fats ( certain baked goods need shortening for texture ) Shortening ( aka lard ) is a saturated fat .
It is not a trans fat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They've already assaulted baked goods by banning trans-fats (certain baked goods need shortening for texture)Shortening (aka lard) is a saturated fat.
It is not a trans fat.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448818</id>
	<title>Stop the lies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268331960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you out of your mind? Go read the health care legislation versions entering reconciliation.</p><p>Stop repeating the lies. No one is going to force you into a health regimen.</p><p>When you've educated yourself beyond ignorance, you will see the requirement to carry INSURANCE. Not any mythical monolithic health regimen.</p><p>Stop repeating the lies. No one is ramming anything down anyone's throat.</p><p>When you've educated yourself beyond ignorance, you will find Americans support the content of the health care insurance legislation. Furthermore, you'll find a majority of Congress voting for the legislation in an open vote. There's no ramming, no throat, no "against the people" bullshit.</p><p>Stop fucking lying because you'd rather not have it pass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you out of your mind ?
Go read the health care legislation versions entering reconciliation.Stop repeating the lies .
No one is going to force you into a health regimen.When you 've educated yourself beyond ignorance , you will see the requirement to carry INSURANCE .
Not any mythical monolithic health regimen.Stop repeating the lies .
No one is ramming anything down anyone 's throat.When you 've educated yourself beyond ignorance , you will find Americans support the content of the health care insurance legislation .
Furthermore , you 'll find a majority of Congress voting for the legislation in an open vote .
There 's no ramming , no throat , no " against the people " bullshit.Stop fucking lying because you 'd rather not have it pass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you out of your mind?
Go read the health care legislation versions entering reconciliation.Stop repeating the lies.
No one is going to force you into a health regimen.When you've educated yourself beyond ignorance, you will see the requirement to carry INSURANCE.
Not any mythical monolithic health regimen.Stop repeating the lies.
No one is ramming anything down anyone's throat.When you've educated yourself beyond ignorance, you will find Americans support the content of the health care insurance legislation.
Furthermore, you'll find a majority of Congress voting for the legislation in an open vote.
There's no ramming, no throat, no "against the people" bullshit.Stop fucking lying because you'd rather not have it pass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444380</id>
	<title>Typical Democrat</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268302380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No one does Nanny State better than the Democrats.  And this clown will probably be re-elected<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No one does Nanny State better than the Democrats .
And this clown will probably be re-elected .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No one does Nanny State better than the Democrats.
And this clown will probably be re-elected ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443386</id>
	<title>Re:Go go Nanny State...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268299380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too stupid to take of yourself, huh?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too stupid to take of yourself , huh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too stupid to take of yourself, huh?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444774</id>
	<title>Re:This just in!</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1268303700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, I wouldn't mind too much as long as they didn't outlaw salt shakers on the table; my blood pressure is always either low or narmal, so salt doesn't hurt me. Salting after cooking is as good as or better than salt during cooking, and it would help people with hypertension.</p><p>I would bet whoever introduced this bill has high blood pressure and was annoyed that he couldn't eat at a restaraunt, which wouldn't make him an idiot, only selfish.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I would n't mind too much as long as they did n't outlaw salt shakers on the table ; my blood pressure is always either low or narmal , so salt does n't hurt me .
Salting after cooking is as good as or better than salt during cooking , and it would help people with hypertension.I would bet whoever introduced this bill has high blood pressure and was annoyed that he could n't eat at a restaraunt , which would n't make him an idiot , only selfish .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I wouldn't mind too much as long as they didn't outlaw salt shakers on the table; my blood pressure is always either low or narmal, so salt doesn't hurt me.
Salting after cooking is as good as or better than salt during cooking, and it would help people with hypertension.I would bet whoever introduced this bill has high blood pressure and was annoyed that he couldn't eat at a restaraunt, which wouldn't make him an idiot, only selfish.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442822</id>
	<title>They should involve the NRA</title>
	<author>asupynuk</author>
	<datestamp>1268340960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because - wait for it - the next thing you know, they are going to try and ban a salt weapon too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because - wait for it - the next thing you know , they are going to try and ban a salt weapon too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because - wait for it - the next thing you know, they are going to try and ban a salt weapon too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447518</id>
	<title>Re:All Forms of Salt</title>
	<author>Le Marteau</author>
	<datestamp>1268317080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The proposed law means and intends "table salt" and everyone knows that.   Should this law be passed, that's how it will be applied:  to ordinary table salt.</p><p>Laws are not written as formulations and are not intended to be read as such.  It is a long-standing legal tradition to assume "the ordinary"meaning of words in laws when there is any ambiguity (see  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory\_interpretation" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">statutory interpretation</a> [wikipedia.org])</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The proposed law means and intends " table salt " and everyone knows that .
Should this law be passed , that 's how it will be applied : to ordinary table salt.Laws are not written as formulations and are not intended to be read as such .
It is a long-standing legal tradition to assume " the ordinary " meaning of words in laws when there is any ambiguity ( see statutory interpretation [ wikipedia.org ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The proposed law means and intends "table salt" and everyone knows that.
Should this law be passed, that's how it will be applied:  to ordinary table salt.Laws are not written as formulations and are not intended to be read as such.
It is a long-standing legal tradition to assume "the ordinary"meaning of words in laws when there is any ambiguity (see  statutory interpretation [wikipedia.org])</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444878</id>
	<title>This is just the beginning...</title>
	<author>Fdisk81</author>
	<datestamp>1268304000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>First, they came for the salt, and I did not speak because I used AlsoSalt.
Then they came for the sugar, but I did not speak because I used Splenda.
Then they came for the butter, but I did not speak because I used Margarine.
Then they came for me, because all that was left was Soylent Green.</htmltext>
<tokenext>First , they came for the salt , and I did not speak because I used AlsoSalt .
Then they came for the sugar , but I did not speak because I used Splenda .
Then they came for the butter , but I did not speak because I used Margarine .
Then they came for me , because all that was left was Soylent Green .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, they came for the salt, and I did not speak because I used AlsoSalt.
Then they came for the sugar, but I did not speak because I used Splenda.
Then they came for the butter, but I did not speak because I used Margarine.
Then they came for me, because all that was left was Soylent Green.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31451030</id>
	<title>What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268406120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you fucking kidding me?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you fucking kidding me ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you fucking kidding me?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446706</id>
	<title>Re:Bad ideas last forever</title>
	<author>jonwil</author>
	<datestamp>1268312100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are shortenings that claim to be "virtually trans-fat free" with less than 1\% trans-fats (Pilot TransEND is one brand name I have heard of making this claim)</p><p>What they use to make this product I dont know.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are shortenings that claim to be " virtually trans-fat free " with less than 1 \ % trans-fats ( Pilot TransEND is one brand name I have heard of making this claim ) What they use to make this product I dont know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are shortenings that claim to be "virtually trans-fat free" with less than 1\% trans-fats (Pilot TransEND is one brand name I have heard of making this claim)What they use to make this product I dont know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444154</id>
	<title>Re:Thank god</title>
	<author>should\_be\_linear</author>
	<datestamp>1268301660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Non-issue on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Non-issue on / .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Non-issue on /.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442652</id>
	<title>Bye Bye New York Pizza</title>
	<author>kseise</author>
	<datestamp>1268340540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Luckily, New York's economy isn't largely dependent on places like pizzerias.
<p>
    *  2 tablespoons sugar</p><p>
    * 1 tablespoon kosher salt*</p><p>
    * 1 tablespoon pure olive oil</p><p>
    * 3/4 cup warm water</p><p>
    * 2 cups bread flour (for bread machines)</p><p>
    * 1 teaspoon instant yeast</p><p>
    * 2 teaspoons olive oil</p><p>
    * Olive oil, for the pizza crust</p><p>
    * Flour, for dusting the pizza peel</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Luckily , New York 's economy is n't largely dependent on places like pizzerias .
* 2 tablespoons sugar * 1 tablespoon kosher salt * * 1 tablespoon pure olive oil * 3/4 cup warm water * 2 cups bread flour ( for bread machines ) * 1 teaspoon instant yeast * 2 teaspoons olive oil * Olive oil , for the pizza crust * Flour , for dusting the pizza peel</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Luckily, New York's economy isn't largely dependent on places like pizzerias.
*  2 tablespoons sugar
    * 1 tablespoon kosher salt*
    * 1 tablespoon pure olive oil
    * 3/4 cup warm water
    * 2 cups bread flour (for bread machines)
    * 1 teaspoon instant yeast
    * 2 teaspoons olive oil
    * Olive oil, for the pizza crust
    * Flour, for dusting the pizza peel</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443622</id>
	<title>10 years ago this was a joke.</title>
	<author>Lord Kano</author>
	<datestamp>1268299980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First, they wanted to ban smoking. Tobacco smoke stinks and it's unhealthy. No one would put up too much of a fight for it. Then they wanted to ban trans-fats, they were unhealthy and no one could argue that they really needed them. Now, the want to ban salt. SALT!</p><p>The people of New York encourages this idiocy by not standing up to it before. Now that they've made their bed, let them lie in it.</p><p>LK</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First , they wanted to ban smoking .
Tobacco smoke stinks and it 's unhealthy .
No one would put up too much of a fight for it .
Then they wanted to ban trans-fats , they were unhealthy and no one could argue that they really needed them .
Now , the want to ban salt .
SALT ! The people of New York encourages this idiocy by not standing up to it before .
Now that they 've made their bed , let them lie in it.LK</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, they wanted to ban smoking.
Tobacco smoke stinks and it's unhealthy.
No one would put up too much of a fight for it.
Then they wanted to ban trans-fats, they were unhealthy and no one could argue that they really needed them.
Now, the want to ban salt.
SALT!The people of New York encourages this idiocy by not standing up to it before.
Now that they've made their bed, let them lie in it.LK</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448460</id>
	<title>No responsibility for their customers?</title>
	<author>Valdrax</author>
	<datestamp>1268326440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Of course McDonald's doesn't and shouldn't care if you are obese, that's nobody's business but your own.</p></div><p>I see where you're coming from for the most part, but I disagree with this statement in particular.  Someone who sells a dangerous product that causes harm to other people bears some moral responsibility for what is done with the product.  The more dangerous the product, and the fewer harmless uses there are for it, the greater the burden to sell responsibly (or the better reason to ban the product entirely).</p><p>Not that I think fast food should be banned.  I just think the McDonalds does have a responsibility to its customers and society not to deliberately encourage bad habits via marketing, especially to children.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course McDonald 's does n't and should n't care if you are obese , that 's nobody 's business but your own.I see where you 're coming from for the most part , but I disagree with this statement in particular .
Someone who sells a dangerous product that causes harm to other people bears some moral responsibility for what is done with the product .
The more dangerous the product , and the fewer harmless uses there are for it , the greater the burden to sell responsibly ( or the better reason to ban the product entirely ) .Not that I think fast food should be banned .
I just think the McDonalds does have a responsibility to its customers and society not to deliberately encourage bad habits via marketing , especially to children .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course McDonald's doesn't and shouldn't care if you are obese, that's nobody's business but your own.I see where you're coming from for the most part, but I disagree with this statement in particular.
Someone who sells a dangerous product that causes harm to other people bears some moral responsibility for what is done with the product.
The more dangerous the product, and the fewer harmless uses there are for it, the greater the burden to sell responsibly (or the better reason to ban the product entirely).Not that I think fast food should be banned.
I just think the McDonalds does have a responsibility to its customers and society not to deliberately encourage bad habits via marketing, especially to children.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446946</id>
	<title>Re:but</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268313300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I smoke my hash salt-free.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I smoke my hash salt-free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I smoke my hash salt-free.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443168</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268298780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Salt: No Felix - <i>I am</i> your father!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Salt : No Felix - I am your father !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Salt: No Felix - I am your father!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443632</id>
	<title>Remove this Dictator from office, immediately</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268300040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ortiz admits that prior to introducing the bill he did not research salt&rsquo;s role in food chemistry, its effect on flavor or his bill&rsquo;s ramifications for the restaurant industry. He tells me he was prompted to introduce the bill because his father used salt excessively for many years, developed high blood pressure and had a heart attack.</p><p>&ldquo;I think salt should be banned in restaurants. I ask if a dish has salt in it, and if I does, I get something else that doesn&rsquo;t have salt,&rdquo; Ortiz tells me, before going on to say that he has eaten, and expects he will continue to eat, among other things, ham, cheese and bread in restaurants, all of which contain salt.</p></div><p>The presumption is that others are too ignorant or irresponsible to "ask if a dish has salt" and if so to "get something else" - and further that the State ought to interfere with individual liberty for the protection of these imagined imbeciles.</p><p>Salt in food will be banned, meanwhile it will remain legal to purchase ethanol and tobacco for human consumption. If an individual wishes to abstain from salt, tobacco, or alcohol, they may do so. The interference of the state is not necessary.</p><p>You elect this gentleman, and your economic output is forcibly confiscated to finance the rediculous proposals he spouts, and you (collectively) do nothing to correct this abhorrence. This perhaps proves that you are indeed the mindless sheeple in need of the nanny state to protect you from your own stupidity. You are responsible for the stupidity of your <strong>representatives</strong>.</p><p>Enjoy your electrolytes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ortiz admits that prior to introducing the bill he did not research salt    s role in food chemistry , its effect on flavor or his bill    s ramifications for the restaurant industry .
He tells me he was prompted to introduce the bill because his father used salt excessively for many years , developed high blood pressure and had a heart attack.    I think salt should be banned in restaurants .
I ask if a dish has salt in it , and if I does , I get something else that doesn    t have salt ,    Ortiz tells me , before going on to say that he has eaten , and expects he will continue to eat , among other things , ham , cheese and bread in restaurants , all of which contain salt.The presumption is that others are too ignorant or irresponsible to " ask if a dish has salt " and if so to " get something else " - and further that the State ought to interfere with individual liberty for the protection of these imagined imbeciles.Salt in food will be banned , meanwhile it will remain legal to purchase ethanol and tobacco for human consumption .
If an individual wishes to abstain from salt , tobacco , or alcohol , they may do so .
The interference of the state is not necessary.You elect this gentleman , and your economic output is forcibly confiscated to finance the rediculous proposals he spouts , and you ( collectively ) do nothing to correct this abhorrence .
This perhaps proves that you are indeed the mindless sheeple in need of the nanny state to protect you from your own stupidity .
You are responsible for the stupidity of your representatives.Enjoy your electrolytes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ortiz admits that prior to introducing the bill he did not research salt’s role in food chemistry, its effect on flavor or his bill’s ramifications for the restaurant industry.
He tells me he was prompted to introduce the bill because his father used salt excessively for many years, developed high blood pressure and had a heart attack.“I think salt should be banned in restaurants.
I ask if a dish has salt in it, and if I does, I get something else that doesn’t have salt,” Ortiz tells me, before going on to say that he has eaten, and expects he will continue to eat, among other things, ham, cheese and bread in restaurants, all of which contain salt.The presumption is that others are too ignorant or irresponsible to "ask if a dish has salt" and if so to "get something else" - and further that the State ought to interfere with individual liberty for the protection of these imagined imbeciles.Salt in food will be banned, meanwhile it will remain legal to purchase ethanol and tobacco for human consumption.
If an individual wishes to abstain from salt, tobacco, or alcohol, they may do so.
The interference of the state is not necessary.You elect this gentleman, and your economic output is forcibly confiscated to finance the rediculous proposals he spouts, and you (collectively) do nothing to correct this abhorrence.
This perhaps proves that you are indeed the mindless sheeple in need of the nanny state to protect you from your own stupidity.
You are responsible for the stupidity of your representatives.Enjoy your electrolytes.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448270</id>
	<title>Re:This just in!</title>
	<author>Christopher Fritz</author>
	<datestamp>1268323980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I would bet whoever introduced this bill has high blood pressure and was annoyed that he couldn't eat at a restaraunt, which wouldn't make him an idiot, only selfish.</p></div><p>Close.  From the article:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Ortiz admits that prior to introducing the bill he did not research salt's role in food chemistry, its effect on flavor or his bill's ramifications for the restaurant industry. He tells me he was prompted to introduce the bill because his father used salt excessively for many years, developed high blood pressure and had a heart attack.</p></div><p>Were this to work its way into a law (which I perhaps naively cannot imagine being possible), I wonder if it would make it that much easier to pass similar laws for similar reasons.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would bet whoever introduced this bill has high blood pressure and was annoyed that he could n't eat at a restaraunt , which would n't make him an idiot , only selfish.Close .
From the article : Ortiz admits that prior to introducing the bill he did not research salt 's role in food chemistry , its effect on flavor or his bill 's ramifications for the restaurant industry .
He tells me he was prompted to introduce the bill because his father used salt excessively for many years , developed high blood pressure and had a heart attack.Were this to work its way into a law ( which I perhaps naively can not imagine being possible ) , I wonder if it would make it that much easier to pass similar laws for similar reasons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would bet whoever introduced this bill has high blood pressure and was annoyed that he couldn't eat at a restaraunt, which wouldn't make him an idiot, only selfish.Close.
From the article:Ortiz admits that prior to introducing the bill he did not research salt's role in food chemistry, its effect on flavor or his bill's ramifications for the restaurant industry.
He tells me he was prompted to introduce the bill because his father used salt excessively for many years, developed high blood pressure and had a heart attack.Were this to work its way into a law (which I perhaps naively cannot imagine being possible), I wonder if it would make it that much easier to pass similar laws for similar reasons.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443838</id>
	<title>Re:Salt really isn't all that bad...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268300700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I took one (1) college course in nutritional biochemistry.  We discussed where the "RDA" and official dietary recommendations come from.  The research to determine these is ALWAYS in flux, changing, and there's even some politics to it.</p><p>i.e. "we know people don't have enough of mineral X in their system to have optimal prevention of diabetes, but people seem to get on fine with the amount they're getting, so let's lower the recommendation" sorts of things have occurred, will occur, and will be revoked, repealed and changed every few years as more research is done.</p><p>It's complicated, and any nutritional scientist knows that all dietary advice is tentative.</p><p>Nobody in government, the media, or the public seems to get that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I took one ( 1 ) college course in nutritional biochemistry .
We discussed where the " RDA " and official dietary recommendations come from .
The research to determine these is ALWAYS in flux , changing , and there 's even some politics to it.i.e .
" we know people do n't have enough of mineral X in their system to have optimal prevention of diabetes , but people seem to get on fine with the amount they 're getting , so let 's lower the recommendation " sorts of things have occurred , will occur , and will be revoked , repealed and changed every few years as more research is done.It 's complicated , and any nutritional scientist knows that all dietary advice is tentative.Nobody in government , the media , or the public seems to get that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I took one (1) college course in nutritional biochemistry.
We discussed where the "RDA" and official dietary recommendations come from.
The research to determine these is ALWAYS in flux, changing, and there's even some politics to it.i.e.
"we know people don't have enough of mineral X in their system to have optimal prevention of diabetes, but people seem to get on fine with the amount they're getting, so let's lower the recommendation" sorts of things have occurred, will occur, and will be revoked, repealed and changed every few years as more research is done.It's complicated, and any nutritional scientist knows that all dietary advice is tentative.Nobody in government, the media, or the public seems to get that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442722</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442400</id>
	<title>Re:This just in!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268339820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's funny about the linked article is that the person who wrote it is a tub of lard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's funny about the linked article is that the person who wrote it is a tub of lard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's funny about the linked article is that the person who wrote it is a tub of lard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443970</id>
	<title>I wasn't using the electrolytes anyway,</title>
	<author>Tangentc</author>
	<datestamp>1268301060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>being that I'm an American and don't ever leave my couch. All this bill will do is biochemically endorse our greatest stereotype.</htmltext>
<tokenext>being that I 'm an American and do n't ever leave my couch .
All this bill will do is biochemically endorse our greatest stereotype .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>being that I'm an American and don't ever leave my couch.
All this bill will do is biochemically endorse our greatest stereotype.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444356</id>
	<title>Re:Thank god</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268302260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Thank god his father didn't pass away while having sex!</p></div><p>AMEN!!!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank god his father did n't pass away while having sex ! AMEN ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank god his father didn't pass away while having sex!AMEN!!
!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444288</id>
	<title>Re:Fail</title>
	<author>m509272</author>
	<datestamp>1268302080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow and my father used salt excessively for years and has LOW blood pressure.  He would salt his food prior to even tasting it.  This guy is an idiot, oh wait he's a politician, never mind, that's a redundant statement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow and my father used salt excessively for years and has LOW blood pressure .
He would salt his food prior to even tasting it .
This guy is an idiot , oh wait he 's a politician , never mind , that 's a redundant statement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow and my father used salt excessively for years and has LOW blood pressure.
He would salt his food prior to even tasting it.
This guy is an idiot, oh wait he's a politician, never mind, that's a redundant statement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31449772</id>
	<title>Structural and gustatory salt</title>
	<author>dugeen</author>
	<datestamp>1268391900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some salt is necessary to make certain recipes work at all, and to make others palatable. But restaurant cooking is notorious for using more salt than is necessary, so measures to prevent this would be welcome.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some salt is necessary to make certain recipes work at all , and to make others palatable .
But restaurant cooking is notorious for using more salt than is necessary , so measures to prevent this would be welcome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some salt is necessary to make certain recipes work at all, and to make others palatable.
But restaurant cooking is notorious for using more salt than is necessary, so measures to prevent this would be welcome.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442334</id>
	<title>Re:So what else is new</title>
	<author>cromar</author>
	<datestamp>1268339700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Eat recycled food. It's good for the environment and okay for you. </i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Eat recycled food .
It 's good for the environment and okay for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eat recycled food.
It's good for the environment and okay for you. </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445074</id>
	<title>Proposed does not</title>
	<author>carp3\_noct3m</author>
	<datestamp>1268304780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Asinine bills are proposed all the fsking time by idiots like this guy. IT IS NOT NEWS. Call me when you actually get more than 5 people actually pushing for it, otherwise its just another stupid bill by a stupid person. Move along, nothing to see here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Asinine bills are proposed all the fsking time by idiots like this guy .
IT IS NOT NEWS .
Call me when you actually get more than 5 people actually pushing for it , otherwise its just another stupid bill by a stupid person .
Move along , nothing to see here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Asinine bills are proposed all the fsking time by idiots like this guy.
IT IS NOT NEWS.
Call me when you actually get more than 5 people actually pushing for it, otherwise its just another stupid bill by a stupid person.
Move along, nothing to see here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443266</id>
	<title>Re:What's going on.</title>
	<author>imgumbydamnit</author>
	<datestamp>1268299080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Trans fats *were* banned in NYC a few years ago, and the world did not end. After all, trans fats were a misguided and dangerous invention of the food industry, akin to toxic food dies and carcinogenic sweeteners. Very different though from banning salt, a natural and essential part of the human diet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Trans fats * were * banned in NYC a few years ago , and the world did not end .
After all , trans fats were a misguided and dangerous invention of the food industry , akin to toxic food dies and carcinogenic sweeteners .
Very different though from banning salt , a natural and essential part of the human diet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trans fats *were* banned in NYC a few years ago, and the world did not end.
After all, trans fats were a misguided and dangerous invention of the food industry, akin to toxic food dies and carcinogenic sweeteners.
Very different though from banning salt, a natural and essential part of the human diet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442204</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442718</id>
	<title>Quick</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268340720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Someone tag this 'demolitionman'</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone tag this 'demolitionman'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone tag this 'demolitionman'</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442934</id>
	<title>Re:So what else is new</title>
	<author>Qzukk</author>
	<datestamp>1268298060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe if everyone stopped crying about elitism when people suggest that we elect <i>smart</i> people to run the country, we wouldn't be having this problem.</p><p>Sadly, stupidity seems to be bi-partisan.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe if everyone stopped crying about elitism when people suggest that we elect smart people to run the country , we would n't be having this problem.Sadly , stupidity seems to be bi-partisan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe if everyone stopped crying about elitism when people suggest that we elect smart people to run the country, we wouldn't be having this problem.Sadly, stupidity seems to be bi-partisan.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447860</id>
	<title>Re:Inevitable.</title>
	<author>dvnelson72</author>
	<datestamp>1268320140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I for one look forward to my daily ration of nutritional paste.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one look forward to my daily ration of nutritional paste .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one look forward to my daily ration of nutritional paste.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446316</id>
	<title>NYC Food</title>
	<author>thekaleb</author>
	<datestamp>1268310000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I used to go to NYC for the food. Now they will seriously loose my tourist money. Now Hoboken will get my dollar.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to go to NYC for the food .
Now they will seriously loose my tourist money .
Now Hoboken will get my dollar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to go to NYC for the food.
Now they will seriously loose my tourist money.
Now Hoboken will get my dollar.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31451472</id>
	<title>Re:Go go Nanny State...</title>
	<author>tehcyder</author>
	<datestamp>1268408640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Of course McDonald's doesn't and shouldn't care if you are obese, that's nobody's business but your own</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
And companies should be allowed to sell machine guns to terrorists, use child labour in factories, bury toxic waste next to a river, or use their monopoly power to squeeze out competitiors.
<br>
<br>
Oh no, at some point we decided that these might not be a good idea, didn't we?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course McDonald 's does n't and should n't care if you are obese , that 's nobody 's business but your own And companies should be allowed to sell machine guns to terrorists , use child labour in factories , bury toxic waste next to a river , or use their monopoly power to squeeze out competitiors .
Oh no , at some point we decided that these might not be a good idea , did n't we ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course McDonald's doesn't and shouldn't care if you are obese, that's nobody's business but your own

And companies should be allowed to sell machine guns to terrorists, use child labour in factories, bury toxic waste next to a river, or use their monopoly power to squeeze out competitiors.
Oh no, at some point we decided that these might not be a good idea, didn't we?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443448</id>
	<title>oblig...</title>
	<author>Bobfrankly1</author>
	<datestamp>1268299500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is saltishist russia......ah, never mind</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is saltishist russia......ah , never mind</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is saltishist russia......ah, never mind</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447148</id>
	<title>FIRST THEY came for the salt ...</title>
	<author>porky\_pig\_jr</author>
	<datestamp>1268314620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but I wasn't<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... eh forget it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but I was n't ... eh forget it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but I wasn't ... eh forget it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445752</id>
	<title>We've all done it</title>
	<author>WinstonWolfIT</author>
	<datestamp>1268307720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is just the legislative equivalent of clicking on Send before checking your facts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is just the legislative equivalent of clicking on Send before checking your facts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is just the legislative equivalent of clicking on Send before checking your facts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444846</id>
	<title>Re:Bad ideas last forever</title>
	<author>h4rr4r</author>
	<datestamp>1268303880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lard works better and tastes better. Trans-fat has no purpose in food.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lard works better and tastes better .
Trans-fat has no purpose in food .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lard works better and tastes better.
Trans-fat has no purpose in food.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443458</id>
	<title>Re:Go go Nanny State...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268299500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Umm, how is killing your "users" a good business strategy?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm , how is killing your " users " a good business strategy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm, how is killing your "users" a good business strategy?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443048</id>
	<title>Thank god</title>
	<author>RJBeery</author>
	<datestamp>1268298420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thank god his father didn't pass away while having sex!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank god his father did n't pass away while having sex !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank god his father didn't pass away while having sex!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443454</id>
	<title>Re:Fail</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268299500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If a politician is going to completely neglect any research or even thought into a bill they propose, they seriously need to be kicked out of office so hard they can't come back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If a politician is going to completely neglect any research or even thought into a bill they propose , they seriously need to be kicked out of office so hard they ca n't come back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a politician is going to completely neglect any research or even thought into a bill they propose, they seriously need to be kicked out of office so hard they can't come back.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443752</id>
	<title>Re:Fail</title>
	<author>Duradin</author>
	<datestamp>1268300400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Salt is not good for you and has been deemed bad, thus it is illegal.</p><p>Anyone want to go to Taco Bell?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Salt is not good for you and has been deemed bad , thus it is illegal.Anyone want to go to Taco Bell ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Salt is not good for you and has been deemed bad, thus it is illegal.Anyone want to go to Taco Bell?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447380</id>
	<title>Re:Too much salt?</title>
	<author>NotQuiteReal</author>
	<datestamp>1268316000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You should use homeopathic salt if you are worried about it doing <i>anything</i>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You should use homeopathic salt if you are worried about it doing anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should use homeopathic salt if you are worried about it doing anything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31460264</id>
	<title>wrong order</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268405640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they shouldve taken away our guns before our salt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they shouldve taken away our guns before our salt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they shouldve taken away our guns before our salt.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442722</id>
	<title>Salt really isn't all that bad...</title>
	<author>Fished</author>
	<datestamp>1268340720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Too much salt" is one of those dietary memes that just won't seem to die.  However, the reality is that (a) only a fraction of individuals (even individuals with high blood pressure) seem to be salt sensitive and (b) there are much more effective ways of reducing high blood pressure than reducing salt consumption.  I was on blood pressure medication, a low salt diet, etc. prior to reducing my carbohydrate intake dramatically last summer, and all it got me was drug side effects and blood pressure that was just barely normal (average 136/88).  Since I've stopped eating most concentrated carbohydrates, my blood pressure has reduced dramatically (I don't bother to monitor any more, but at my last doctor's appointment it was 122/72).  On top of that, my blood sugars have improved dramatically (from average BG of 138 to average BG of 91) and my lipid profile has improved dramatically (total cholestorol 233 then vs. 135 at last doctor's appt., triglycerides 700+ vs. 85 at last doctor's appointment.)  All this even as I lost almost 100 lbs.</p><p>What was the change?  I *stopped* eating sugar and other refined carbohydrates, and I *started* eating salt again.  Oh yeah, and I *love* fat and protein, because they make me feel full.</p><p>The bottom line is that I have no confidence in the ability of the "main stream" medical community to define a single nutritional standard that will work for everyone.  And I have even less confidence in the ability of bureaucrats and legislators to correctly parse through the research to find the truth.  So <b>leave my food alone.</b>  If you really feel like you've got to do something, please start requiring restaurants to <b>label</b> their foods (on the menu) so that it's easier for diabetics like me to find menu items that aren't loaded with sugars that will make our blood sugars spike.  Or if you really want to interfere, require restaurants to offer low-fat, low-carb, and low-salt entrees.  But don't impose your notion of good nutrition on me, because I tried to do it your way and it damn near killed me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Too much salt " is one of those dietary memes that just wo n't seem to die .
However , the reality is that ( a ) only a fraction of individuals ( even individuals with high blood pressure ) seem to be salt sensitive and ( b ) there are much more effective ways of reducing high blood pressure than reducing salt consumption .
I was on blood pressure medication , a low salt diet , etc .
prior to reducing my carbohydrate intake dramatically last summer , and all it got me was drug side effects and blood pressure that was just barely normal ( average 136/88 ) .
Since I 've stopped eating most concentrated carbohydrates , my blood pressure has reduced dramatically ( I do n't bother to monitor any more , but at my last doctor 's appointment it was 122/72 ) .
On top of that , my blood sugars have improved dramatically ( from average BG of 138 to average BG of 91 ) and my lipid profile has improved dramatically ( total cholestorol 233 then vs. 135 at last doctor 's appt. , triglycerides 700 + vs. 85 at last doctor 's appointment .
) All this even as I lost almost 100 lbs.What was the change ?
I * stopped * eating sugar and other refined carbohydrates , and I * started * eating salt again .
Oh yeah , and I * love * fat and protein , because they make me feel full.The bottom line is that I have no confidence in the ability of the " main stream " medical community to define a single nutritional standard that will work for everyone .
And I have even less confidence in the ability of bureaucrats and legislators to correctly parse through the research to find the truth .
So leave my food alone .
If you really feel like you 've got to do something , please start requiring restaurants to label their foods ( on the menu ) so that it 's easier for diabetics like me to find menu items that are n't loaded with sugars that will make our blood sugars spike .
Or if you really want to interfere , require restaurants to offer low-fat , low-carb , and low-salt entrees .
But do n't impose your notion of good nutrition on me , because I tried to do it your way and it damn near killed me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Too much salt" is one of those dietary memes that just won't seem to die.
However, the reality is that (a) only a fraction of individuals (even individuals with high blood pressure) seem to be salt sensitive and (b) there are much more effective ways of reducing high blood pressure than reducing salt consumption.
I was on blood pressure medication, a low salt diet, etc.
prior to reducing my carbohydrate intake dramatically last summer, and all it got me was drug side effects and blood pressure that was just barely normal (average 136/88).
Since I've stopped eating most concentrated carbohydrates, my blood pressure has reduced dramatically (I don't bother to monitor any more, but at my last doctor's appointment it was 122/72).
On top of that, my blood sugars have improved dramatically (from average BG of 138 to average BG of 91) and my lipid profile has improved dramatically (total cholestorol 233 then vs. 135 at last doctor's appt., triglycerides 700+ vs. 85 at last doctor's appointment.
)  All this even as I lost almost 100 lbs.What was the change?
I *stopped* eating sugar and other refined carbohydrates, and I *started* eating salt again.
Oh yeah, and I *love* fat and protein, because they make me feel full.The bottom line is that I have no confidence in the ability of the "main stream" medical community to define a single nutritional standard that will work for everyone.
And I have even less confidence in the ability of bureaucrats and legislators to correctly parse through the research to find the truth.
So leave my food alone.
If you really feel like you've got to do something, please start requiring restaurants to label their foods (on the menu) so that it's easier for diabetics like me to find menu items that aren't loaded with sugars that will make our blood sugars spike.
Or if you really want to interfere, require restaurants to offer low-fat, low-carb, and low-salt entrees.
But don't impose your notion of good nutrition on me, because I tried to do it your way and it damn near killed me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443228</id>
	<title>Re:Fail</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268298900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heard him on a news channel this morning and he stated that the bill would enable a restaurant patron to ask the chef about how much salt was used in a particular item.  When asked if his bill would prohibit salt, he said, "No."  The bill was designed to create a dialogue between a patron and the chef about sodium content.  Who knows what the truth is without reading the bill.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heard him on a news channel this morning and he stated that the bill would enable a restaurant patron to ask the chef about how much salt was used in a particular item .
When asked if his bill would prohibit salt , he said , " No .
" The bill was designed to create a dialogue between a patron and the chef about sodium content .
Who knows what the truth is without reading the bill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heard him on a news channel this morning and he stated that the bill would enable a restaurant patron to ask the chef about how much salt was used in a particular item.
When asked if his bill would prohibit salt, he said, "No.
"  The bill was designed to create a dialogue between a patron and the chef about sodium content.
Who knows what the truth is without reading the bill.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447178</id>
	<title>This is Great News!</title>
	<author>hduff</author>
	<datestamp>1268314800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps we can get him to sponsor a bill to make the value of Pi 3.0 so geometry can be easier and a bill defining division by zero as one. Then a bill to make not paying any tax a felony with a minimum sentence of  10 years and also make it a felony not to vote.</p><p>With the right encouragement, this asshat can go far.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps we can get him to sponsor a bill to make the value of Pi 3.0 so geometry can be easier and a bill defining division by zero as one .
Then a bill to make not paying any tax a felony with a minimum sentence of 10 years and also make it a felony not to vote.With the right encouragement , this asshat can go far .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps we can get him to sponsor a bill to make the value of Pi 3.0 so geometry can be easier and a bill defining division by zero as one.
Then a bill to make not paying any tax a felony with a minimum sentence of  10 years and also make it a felony not to vote.With the right encouragement, this asshat can go far.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442200</id>
	<title>Nails are dangerous too...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268339340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I stepped on a nail once when I was a kid... It hurt.</p><p>They should pass a law that makes it illegal for carpenters to use nails so this never happens to another innocent child.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I stepped on a nail once when I was a kid... It hurt.They should pass a law that makes it illegal for carpenters to use nails so this never happens to another innocent child .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I stepped on a nail once when I was a kid... It hurt.They should pass a law that makes it illegal for carpenters to use nails so this never happens to another innocent child.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31449588</id>
	<title>Re:Some people are idiots</title>
	<author>Seahawk</author>
	<datestamp>1268388960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, lets have a law that bans banning!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , lets have a law that bans banning !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, lets have a law that bans banning!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447830</id>
	<title>Re:Some people are idiots</title>
	<author>Ocyris</author>
	<datestamp>1268319900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nanny state.  People are too stupid so we have to take care of them...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nanny state .
People are too stupid so we have to take care of them.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nanny state.
People are too stupid so we have to take care of them...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446150</id>
	<title>Re:Some people are idiots</title>
	<author>Kohath</author>
	<datestamp>1268309160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's because they know how you should lead your life.  They <b>know</b>.  And you're doing it wrong.  Therefore, you need their help making choices.  They're banning things to help you.</p><p>You should thank them.  They are heroically protecting you by banning you from making incorrect choices.  Why aren't you thanking them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's because they know how you should lead your life .
They know .
And you 're doing it wrong .
Therefore , you need their help making choices .
They 're banning things to help you.You should thank them .
They are heroically protecting you by banning you from making incorrect choices .
Why are n't you thanking them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's because they know how you should lead your life.
They know.
And you're doing it wrong.
Therefore, you need their help making choices.
They're banning things to help you.You should thank them.
They are heroically protecting you by banning you from making incorrect choices.
Why aren't you thanking them?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444764</id>
	<title>Why is this even newsworthy?</title>
	<author>Mr Otobor</author>
	<datestamp>1268303700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aside from the head-shaking, "Look at this idiot over here" value, why is this even newsworthy?  The whole concept of banning salt-use is so preposterous that this will tank without debate.  Even in an F'd up state like NY (sorry NY, I couldn't help it, as I'm from Cali.)</p><p>The fact that people are attempting to logically debate this, using it to snip at Dems (and back at Repubs), debate drug policy, etc. just shows the extent folks are liable to get sucked into stupid arguments.  For every 1 ill-thought out or knee jerk bill you hear about in Congress there are, oh, roughly 50 in the states... so, again, why is this even comment or newsworthy?  Even for Slashdot (sorry<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/., I couldn't help it, as I'm from... Slashdot.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aside from the head-shaking , " Look at this idiot over here " value , why is this even newsworthy ?
The whole concept of banning salt-use is so preposterous that this will tank without debate .
Even in an F 'd up state like NY ( sorry NY , I could n't help it , as I 'm from Cali .
) The fact that people are attempting to logically debate this , using it to snip at Dems ( and back at Repubs ) , debate drug policy , etc .
just shows the extent folks are liable to get sucked into stupid arguments .
For every 1 ill-thought out or knee jerk bill you hear about in Congress there are , oh , roughly 50 in the states... so , again , why is this even comment or newsworthy ?
Even for Slashdot ( sorry /. , I could n't help it , as I 'm from.. .
Slashdot. )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aside from the head-shaking, "Look at this idiot over here" value, why is this even newsworthy?
The whole concept of banning salt-use is so preposterous that this will tank without debate.
Even in an F'd up state like NY (sorry NY, I couldn't help it, as I'm from Cali.
)The fact that people are attempting to logically debate this, using it to snip at Dems (and back at Repubs), debate drug policy, etc.
just shows the extent folks are liable to get sucked into stupid arguments.
For every 1 ill-thought out or knee jerk bill you hear about in Congress there are, oh, roughly 50 in the states... so, again, why is this even comment or newsworthy?
Even for Slashdot (sorry /., I couldn't help it, as I'm from...
Slashdot.)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442892</id>
	<title>Re:Bad ideas last forever</title>
	<author>martas</author>
	<datestamp>1268341140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>watered-down anti-salt bill</p></div><p>
I LOLed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>watered-down anti-salt bill I LOLed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>watered-down anti-salt bill
I LOLed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31450894</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>SphericalCrusher</author>
	<datestamp>1268405160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree with the author in this... doing this, would unbalance food chemistry as we know it. Horrible idea and it will never be passed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree with the author in this... doing this , would unbalance food chemistry as we know it .
Horrible idea and it will never be passed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree with the author in this... doing this, would unbalance food chemistry as we know it.
Horrible idea and it will never be passed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442224</id>
	<title>Food religion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268339400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Salt is used by the evil corporation to make their over-produced crap more palatable. Therefore, salt itself is evil.</p><p>The dietary sodium intake leading heart disease and high blood pressure is NOT settled.</p><p>And real cooks cooking real food ALL use sodium.</p><p>Hopefully, like the beer raids in PA, this will lead to the idiots that propose this crap legislation getting less and less political power.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Salt is used by the evil corporation to make their over-produced crap more palatable .
Therefore , salt itself is evil.The dietary sodium intake leading heart disease and high blood pressure is NOT settled.And real cooks cooking real food ALL use sodium.Hopefully , like the beer raids in PA , this will lead to the idiots that propose this crap legislation getting less and less political power .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Salt is used by the evil corporation to make their over-produced crap more palatable.
Therefore, salt itself is evil.The dietary sodium intake leading heart disease and high blood pressure is NOT settled.And real cooks cooking real food ALL use sodium.Hopefully, like the beer raids in PA, this will lead to the idiots that propose this crap legislation getting less and less political power.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443280</id>
	<title>Damn!</title>
	<author>sycodon</author>
	<datestamp>1268299080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another way to put it...</p><p>Damn!...Just, Damn!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another way to put it...Damn ! ...Just , Damn !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another way to put it...Damn!...Just, Damn!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442506</id>
	<title>This is just grandstanding.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268340120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Like bills to outlaw the word "bitch" or define Pi as 3, there's no reason to get all worked up about it as it has 0 chance of ever passing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Like bills to outlaw the word " bitch " or define Pi as 3 , there 's no reason to get all worked up about it as it has 0 chance of ever passing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like bills to outlaw the word "bitch" or define Pi as 3, there's no reason to get all worked up about it as it has 0 chance of ever passing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444510</id>
	<title>Consequences?</title>
	<author>magus\_melchior</author>
	<datestamp>1268302740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"What consequences?" I'm sure the idiot politician asked. I wonder if this bill bans (1) all salts (which would be impossible), (2) all foods containing sodium chloride (which is ridiculous and cost-prohibitive to enforce), or (3) just all added table/sea salt.</p><p>If it's banning (3) and (2), it would ban all foods preserved by brining or curing from being served in restaurants. That means all preserved meats (sausage, ham, and bacon to name a few), preserved fish like gravlax, and all natural pickles such as sauerkraut, not to mention a whole host of ethnic foods that are made by preserving in salt or salt solutions. Let's see this moron backtrack when his favorite pizza joint can't sell pepperoni or olives on their pizzas anymore-- or for that matter, tomato sauce, cheese, and the crust itself. Enjoy your imaginary pizza! The only real topping available is mushrooms!</p><p>How about pasta? Every prep method I know involves salted water. Are they going to shut down or fine Italian shops too?</p><p>Don't even get me started on the inevitable ruckus the fast-food joints will raise because now their those that salt their fries will find that they taste like cheap greasy gym socks.</p><p>One thing I do know is that this bill would force every consumer in his jurisdiction to cook at home, because all the restaurant food would taste like cardboard and/or be so cost-prohibitive that they'd shut down.</p><p>And all this assumes that this bill will even pass, because the aforementioned fast-food places will raise enough of a fuss to shut this stupidity down. For once, those poster-children of obesity and crummy labor/management are useful...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" What consequences ?
" I 'm sure the idiot politician asked .
I wonder if this bill bans ( 1 ) all salts ( which would be impossible ) , ( 2 ) all foods containing sodium chloride ( which is ridiculous and cost-prohibitive to enforce ) , or ( 3 ) just all added table/sea salt.If it 's banning ( 3 ) and ( 2 ) , it would ban all foods preserved by brining or curing from being served in restaurants .
That means all preserved meats ( sausage , ham , and bacon to name a few ) , preserved fish like gravlax , and all natural pickles such as sauerkraut , not to mention a whole host of ethnic foods that are made by preserving in salt or salt solutions .
Let 's see this moron backtrack when his favorite pizza joint ca n't sell pepperoni or olives on their pizzas anymore-- or for that matter , tomato sauce , cheese , and the crust itself .
Enjoy your imaginary pizza !
The only real topping available is mushrooms ! How about pasta ?
Every prep method I know involves salted water .
Are they going to shut down or fine Italian shops too ? Do n't even get me started on the inevitable ruckus the fast-food joints will raise because now their those that salt their fries will find that they taste like cheap greasy gym socks.One thing I do know is that this bill would force every consumer in his jurisdiction to cook at home , because all the restaurant food would taste like cardboard and/or be so cost-prohibitive that they 'd shut down.And all this assumes that this bill will even pass , because the aforementioned fast-food places will raise enough of a fuss to shut this stupidity down .
For once , those poster-children of obesity and crummy labor/management are useful.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"What consequences?
" I'm sure the idiot politician asked.
I wonder if this bill bans (1) all salts (which would be impossible), (2) all foods containing sodium chloride (which is ridiculous and cost-prohibitive to enforce), or (3) just all added table/sea salt.If it's banning (3) and (2), it would ban all foods preserved by brining or curing from being served in restaurants.
That means all preserved meats (sausage, ham, and bacon to name a few), preserved fish like gravlax, and all natural pickles such as sauerkraut, not to mention a whole host of ethnic foods that are made by preserving in salt or salt solutions.
Let's see this moron backtrack when his favorite pizza joint can't sell pepperoni or olives on their pizzas anymore-- or for that matter, tomato sauce, cheese, and the crust itself.
Enjoy your imaginary pizza!
The only real topping available is mushrooms!How about pasta?
Every prep method I know involves salted water.
Are they going to shut down or fine Italian shops too?Don't even get me started on the inevitable ruckus the fast-food joints will raise because now their those that salt their fries will find that they taste like cheap greasy gym socks.One thing I do know is that this bill would force every consumer in his jurisdiction to cook at home, because all the restaurant food would taste like cardboard and/or be so cost-prohibitive that they'd shut down.And all this assumes that this bill will even pass, because the aforementioned fast-food places will raise enough of a fuss to shut this stupidity down.
For once, those poster-children of obesity and crummy labor/management are useful...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447014</id>
	<title>Garlic?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268313720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Garlic will chase them away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Garlic will chase them away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Garlic will chase them away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447920</id>
	<title>I have a proposal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268320620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a proposal:</p><p>Felix Ortiz should be required by the committee to consume NO salt for a period of one year before they take this bill up for consideration. If he is even still alive, he'll have changed his mind.  He should also pick up a book or two or audit a couple of physiology and nutrition classes and learn that not everyone's biology is the same. Some people's bodies have problems taking the USDA recommended amount of salt. Others ideal amount may be exactly what the USDA recommends. Others may require several times that amount.</p><p>The same should be required of legislators who wish to outlaw all cholesterol, or outlaw all saturated fats. Let's see if they can survive past the one-year mark.</p><p>I probably couldn't make it past a month on zero cholesterol and no salt. My adrenal glands need every bit of cholesterol I can get (or go on daily cortisol injections, which introduces other problems), and I need a lot more electrolytes including sodium chloride than most people do. So, I choose to get what I need by carefully selecting foods which are high in sodium, potassium, and the other electrolytes, and very high in cholesterol but relatively low fat/low cal, such as shrimp and other seafoods. Due to the same underlying health condition I have to also avoid most forms of soy and soy extracts, which blocks out most processed so-called "health foods." So, my diet consists mostly of whole, un-processed foods.</p><p>Felix Ortiz, like most democrats (and most modern republicans) is an idiot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a proposal : Felix Ortiz should be required by the committee to consume NO salt for a period of one year before they take this bill up for consideration .
If he is even still alive , he 'll have changed his mind .
He should also pick up a book or two or audit a couple of physiology and nutrition classes and learn that not everyone 's biology is the same .
Some people 's bodies have problems taking the USDA recommended amount of salt .
Others ideal amount may be exactly what the USDA recommends .
Others may require several times that amount.The same should be required of legislators who wish to outlaw all cholesterol , or outlaw all saturated fats .
Let 's see if they can survive past the one-year mark.I probably could n't make it past a month on zero cholesterol and no salt .
My adrenal glands need every bit of cholesterol I can get ( or go on daily cortisol injections , which introduces other problems ) , and I need a lot more electrolytes including sodium chloride than most people do .
So , I choose to get what I need by carefully selecting foods which are high in sodium , potassium , and the other electrolytes , and very high in cholesterol but relatively low fat/low cal , such as shrimp and other seafoods .
Due to the same underlying health condition I have to also avoid most forms of soy and soy extracts , which blocks out most processed so-called " health foods .
" So , my diet consists mostly of whole , un-processed foods.Felix Ortiz , like most democrats ( and most modern republicans ) is an idiot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a proposal:Felix Ortiz should be required by the committee to consume NO salt for a period of one year before they take this bill up for consideration.
If he is even still alive, he'll have changed his mind.
He should also pick up a book or two or audit a couple of physiology and nutrition classes and learn that not everyone's biology is the same.
Some people's bodies have problems taking the USDA recommended amount of salt.
Others ideal amount may be exactly what the USDA recommends.
Others may require several times that amount.The same should be required of legislators who wish to outlaw all cholesterol, or outlaw all saturated fats.
Let's see if they can survive past the one-year mark.I probably couldn't make it past a month on zero cholesterol and no salt.
My adrenal glands need every bit of cholesterol I can get (or go on daily cortisol injections, which introduces other problems), and I need a lot more electrolytes including sodium chloride than most people do.
So, I choose to get what I need by carefully selecting foods which are high in sodium, potassium, and the other electrolytes, and very high in cholesterol but relatively low fat/low cal, such as shrimp and other seafoods.
Due to the same underlying health condition I have to also avoid most forms of soy and soy extracts, which blocks out most processed so-called "health foods.
" So, my diet consists mostly of whole, un-processed foods.Felix Ortiz, like most democrats (and most modern republicans) is an idiot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442972</id>
	<title>Re:Too much salt?</title>
	<author>Attila Dimedici</author>
	<datestamp>1268298180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are you telling me that the stuff Mortons sells isn't NaCl? (If you were trying to be funny, blame the moderators for marking you informative). NaCl is a necessary part of a human's diet. The only difference between the salt that Mortons sells and "real" sea salt is that sea salt contains minute amounts of other chemicals as well as NaCl.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you telling me that the stuff Mortons sells is n't NaCl ?
( If you were trying to be funny , blame the moderators for marking you informative ) .
NaCl is a necessary part of a human 's diet .
The only difference between the salt that Mortons sells and " real " sea salt is that sea salt contains minute amounts of other chemicals as well as NaCl .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you telling me that the stuff Mortons sells isn't NaCl?
(If you were trying to be funny, blame the moderators for marking you informative).
NaCl is a necessary part of a human's diet.
The only difference between the salt that Mortons sells and "real" sea salt is that sea salt contains minute amounts of other chemicals as well as NaCl.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444178</id>
	<title>Re:More Important Things</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268301720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Politicians having something important to do?!?</p><p>You must be new to this hell whole....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Politicians having something important to do ? !
? You must be new to this hell whole... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Politicians having something important to do?!
?You must be new to this hell whole....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444958</id>
	<title>That's it...we need to stop this.</title>
	<author>Real1tyCzech</author>
	<datestamp>1268304360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remove him from office.</p><p>Ban him from government for life.</p><p>Bring him up on charges just shy of treason.</p><p>No.  I am not joking.</p><p>This has gone on long enough.  How many bills and amendments get proposed that accomplish nothing but drain our resources?</p><p>This guy did *ZERO* research.  Admitted it himself.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...and this is "for the people"??</p><p>No.  He sought his own personal agenda ahead of that of Country and Constitution, against the oath he took for office...without so much as a single thought for Country or Constitution.</p><p>Make.  Him.  Gone.</p><p>Then make a habit of doing the same to all of the others that constantly pull this BS.  The next twit to push a bill for some "Save the Children" game-ratings?  Gone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remove him from office.Ban him from government for life.Bring him up on charges just shy of treason.No .
I am not joking.This has gone on long enough .
How many bills and amendments get proposed that accomplish nothing but drain our resources ? This guy did * ZERO * research .
Admitted it himself .
...and this is " for the people " ? ? No .
He sought his own personal agenda ahead of that of Country and Constitution , against the oath he took for office...without so much as a single thought for Country or Constitution.Make .
Him. Gone.Then make a habit of doing the same to all of the others that constantly pull this BS .
The next twit to push a bill for some " Save the Children " game-ratings ?
Gone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remove him from office.Ban him from government for life.Bring him up on charges just shy of treason.No.
I am not joking.This has gone on long enough.
How many bills and amendments get proposed that accomplish nothing but drain our resources?This guy did *ZERO* research.
Admitted it himself.
...and this is "for the people"??No.
He sought his own personal agenda ahead of that of Country and Constitution, against the oath he took for office...without so much as a single thought for Country or Constitution.Make.
Him.  Gone.Then make a habit of doing the same to all of the others that constantly pull this BS.
The next twit to push a bill for some "Save the Children" game-ratings?
Gone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31452788</id>
	<title>Re:Oritz is apparently an idiot...</title>
	<author>Valdrax</author>
	<datestamp>1268414940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Emphasis mine. According to this statement, Oritz says that he did not consider that banning salt in restaurants would affect the flavor of the foods served in those restaurants. It isn't possible for this to be true. He's lying through his teeth.</p></div><p>Personally, I don't think it's possible for anyone to suggest legislation like this <em>without</em> failing to consider a lot of very obvious things.  I choose to blame stupidity over malice.</p><p>He's just another crazy, local lawmaker who has decided that he wants everyone in the world to bend around the way he wants to live his life.  He just realizes that he'll have a lot less trouble finding low-salt foods if NO ONE can sell foods with regular amounts of salt, and he was too ignorant to realize what a blanket ban means when he proposed the law.</p><p>This is par for the course with local lawmakers, in my experience.  Every few years someone crazy and self-centered (or overwhelmingly nanny-minded) crops up and tries to pass something insane and impractical because they don't think about unintended consequenes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Emphasis mine .
According to this statement , Oritz says that he did not consider that banning salt in restaurants would affect the flavor of the foods served in those restaurants .
It is n't possible for this to be true .
He 's lying through his teeth.Personally , I do n't think it 's possible for anyone to suggest legislation like this without failing to consider a lot of very obvious things .
I choose to blame stupidity over malice.He 's just another crazy , local lawmaker who has decided that he wants everyone in the world to bend around the way he wants to live his life .
He just realizes that he 'll have a lot less trouble finding low-salt foods if NO ONE can sell foods with regular amounts of salt , and he was too ignorant to realize what a blanket ban means when he proposed the law.This is par for the course with local lawmakers , in my experience .
Every few years someone crazy and self-centered ( or overwhelmingly nanny-minded ) crops up and tries to pass something insane and impractical because they do n't think about unintended consequenes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Emphasis mine.
According to this statement, Oritz says that he did not consider that banning salt in restaurants would affect the flavor of the foods served in those restaurants.
It isn't possible for this to be true.
He's lying through his teeth.Personally, I don't think it's possible for anyone to suggest legislation like this without failing to consider a lot of very obvious things.
I choose to blame stupidity over malice.He's just another crazy, local lawmaker who has decided that he wants everyone in the world to bend around the way he wants to live his life.
He just realizes that he'll have a lot less trouble finding low-salt foods if NO ONE can sell foods with regular amounts of salt, and he was too ignorant to realize what a blanket ban means when he proposed the law.This is par for the course with local lawmakers, in my experience.
Every few years someone crazy and self-centered (or overwhelmingly nanny-minded) crops up and tries to pass something insane and impractical because they don't think about unintended consequenes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442862</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444002</id>
	<title>Re:What's going on.</title>
	<author>bosxfan</author>
	<datestamp>1268301180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They banned the use of trans fats in restaurants in NYC back in June 2008.  In order to comply with the law as quickly and as cheaply as possible most just made a wholesale change from the trans fat shortenings to palm oil.  So now your "Zero Trans Fat" cookie contains an equally damaging amount of saturated fats from the palm oil.</p><p>If you really want to make a difference in your health with respect to the food you eat stop being lazy and make your own food from scratch (not processed foods) and stop eating out.</p><p>Don't rely on politicians to make your health decisions for you.  Make them yourself and don't try and place blame for your demise on someone else because of the poor diet that you chose to consume.</p><p>--<br>Secure the borders, kill the terrorists and stop making excuses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They banned the use of trans fats in restaurants in NYC back in June 2008 .
In order to comply with the law as quickly and as cheaply as possible most just made a wholesale change from the trans fat shortenings to palm oil .
So now your " Zero Trans Fat " cookie contains an equally damaging amount of saturated fats from the palm oil.If you really want to make a difference in your health with respect to the food you eat stop being lazy and make your own food from scratch ( not processed foods ) and stop eating out.Do n't rely on politicians to make your health decisions for you .
Make them yourself and do n't try and place blame for your demise on someone else because of the poor diet that you chose to consume.--Secure the borders , kill the terrorists and stop making excuses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They banned the use of trans fats in restaurants in NYC back in June 2008.
In order to comply with the law as quickly and as cheaply as possible most just made a wholesale change from the trans fat shortenings to palm oil.
So now your "Zero Trans Fat" cookie contains an equally damaging amount of saturated fats from the palm oil.If you really want to make a difference in your health with respect to the food you eat stop being lazy and make your own food from scratch (not processed foods) and stop eating out.Don't rely on politicians to make your health decisions for you.
Make them yourself and don't try and place blame for your demise on someone else because of the poor diet that you chose to consume.--Secure the borders, kill the terrorists and stop making excuses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442204</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31450912</id>
	<title>Re:Some people are idiots</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268405340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're right! Lets ban legislation before it's too late.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're right !
Lets ban legislation before it 's too late .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're right!
Lets ban legislation before it's too late.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444060</id>
	<title>Re:So what else is new</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268301360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Want a fun read?<br> <br>Seach the following;<br> <br>Aspartame<br> <br>Sucralose<br> <br>Acesulfame<br> <br>I'd link but my html-fu is weak and I have too much to do today to look it up at the moment.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Want a fun read ?
Seach the following ; Aspartame Sucralose Acesulfame I 'd link but my html-fu is weak and I have too much to do today to look it up at the moment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Want a fun read?
Seach the following; Aspartame Sucralose Acesulfame I'd link but my html-fu is weak and I have too much to do today to look it up at the moment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443556</id>
	<title>Nero Fiddles</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268299800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nero fiddles while NYC burns. The Big Apple is in a state of economic disarray facing huge deficits due to a revolving door of public handouts and other absurd spending habits. Politicians with absolutely no business experience conclude that raising taxes through the roof is the way to go, resulting in the overtaxed rich simply moving out of state.</p><p>And what are they doing about it? Politicians such as Idiot Ortiz decides to place further restrictions on a hugely competitive restaurant market with more lunatic laws.</p><p>The Big Apple is rotting from the inside.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nero fiddles while NYC burns .
The Big Apple is in a state of economic disarray facing huge deficits due to a revolving door of public handouts and other absurd spending habits .
Politicians with absolutely no business experience conclude that raising taxes through the roof is the way to go , resulting in the overtaxed rich simply moving out of state.And what are they doing about it ?
Politicians such as Idiot Ortiz decides to place further restrictions on a hugely competitive restaurant market with more lunatic laws.The Big Apple is rotting from the inside .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nero fiddles while NYC burns.
The Big Apple is in a state of economic disarray facing huge deficits due to a revolving door of public handouts and other absurd spending habits.
Politicians with absolutely no business experience conclude that raising taxes through the roof is the way to go, resulting in the overtaxed rich simply moving out of state.And what are they doing about it?
Politicians such as Idiot Ortiz decides to place further restrictions on a hugely competitive restaurant market with more lunatic laws.The Big Apple is rotting from the inside.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442688</id>
	<title>Salary</title>
	<author>J'raxis</author>
	<datestamp>1268340600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who pays this idiot's salary? (And does he know <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salary#First\_paid\_salary" title="wikipedia.org">where the word comes from</a> [wikipedia.org]?)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who pays this idiot 's salary ?
( And does he know where the word comes from [ wikipedia.org ] ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who pays this idiot's salary?
(And does he know where the word comes from [wikipedia.org]?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448848</id>
	<title>What... A... Fucktard...</title>
	<author>Greyfox</author>
	<datestamp>1268332320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I propose that a new law be introduced that any person attempting to introduce such legislation be required to survive a year without any form of salt prior to introducing his legislation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I propose that a new law be introduced that any person attempting to introduce such legislation be required to survive a year without any form of salt prior to introducing his legislation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I propose that a new law be introduced that any person attempting to introduce such legislation be required to survive a year without any form of salt prior to introducing his legislation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443402</id>
	<title>Re:This just in!</title>
	<author>c++0xFF</author>
	<datestamp>1268299380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now I'm confused!</p><p>It used to be that the government used to pay people with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">salt</a> [wikipedia.org]*.  Now they're "banning" its use.  Make up your minds!</p><p>* Actually, that is quite possibly an urban legend.  See the History section and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salary" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">this</a> [wikipedia.org] article, too.  But I couldn't let that get in the way of a joke, could I?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now I 'm confused ! It used to be that the government used to pay people with salt [ wikipedia.org ] * .
Now they 're " banning " its use .
Make up your minds !
* Actually , that is quite possibly an urban legend .
See the History section and this [ wikipedia.org ] article , too .
But I could n't let that get in the way of a joke , could I ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now I'm confused!It used to be that the government used to pay people with salt [wikipedia.org]*.
Now they're "banning" its use.
Make up your minds!
* Actually, that is quite possibly an urban legend.
See the History section and this [wikipedia.org] article, too.
But I couldn't let that get in the way of a joke, could I?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31450936</id>
	<title>public service announcement (updated from 1970)</title>
	<author>cstacy</author>
	<datestamp>1268405520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Thank god for this bill.</p><p>When I was a young boy I started doing salt. I figured yea its just salt right? Afterwards I moved on to cracked pepper and eventually later in life started experimenting with parsley, basil and oregeno. Before I knew it I was hooked on Thyme and garlic and I lost everything. My wife, my job, my kids, all gone. Even the dog ran away. Now you will find me lurking on the school grounds giving away free herbs, knowing that once hooked they will never be the same. So please think of the children and avoid my culinary fate.</p></div><p>"How you know you even *got* amiloride-insensitive Na+ receptors from chromosome 17, kid?"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank god for this bill.When I was a young boy I started doing salt .
I figured yea its just salt right ?
Afterwards I moved on to cracked pepper and eventually later in life started experimenting with parsley , basil and oregeno .
Before I knew it I was hooked on Thyme and garlic and I lost everything .
My wife , my job , my kids , all gone .
Even the dog ran away .
Now you will find me lurking on the school grounds giving away free herbs , knowing that once hooked they will never be the same .
So please think of the children and avoid my culinary fate .
" How you know you even * got * amiloride-insensitive Na + receptors from chromosome 17 , kid ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank god for this bill.When I was a young boy I started doing salt.
I figured yea its just salt right?
Afterwards I moved on to cracked pepper and eventually later in life started experimenting with parsley, basil and oregeno.
Before I knew it I was hooked on Thyme and garlic and I lost everything.
My wife, my job, my kids, all gone.
Even the dog ran away.
Now you will find me lurking on the school grounds giving away free herbs, knowing that once hooked they will never be the same.
So please think of the children and avoid my culinary fate.
"How you know you even *got* amiloride-insensitive Na+ receptors from chromosome 17, kid?
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444084</id>
	<title>Attacking this the wrong way.</title>
	<author>tthomas48</author>
	<datestamp>1268301420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This would make more sense if they hadn't found that using salt in the cooking process results in less salt consumed than if you put in no salt and hand someone a salt shaker. If your customers are salting every bite, you've hardly fixed the problem.</p><p>If he wanted to do the nanny-state properly he should ban customers from having salt shakers and leave salt levels to the experts in the kitchen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This would make more sense if they had n't found that using salt in the cooking process results in less salt consumed than if you put in no salt and hand someone a salt shaker .
If your customers are salting every bite , you 've hardly fixed the problem.If he wanted to do the nanny-state properly he should ban customers from having salt shakers and leave salt levels to the experts in the kitchen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would make more sense if they hadn't found that using salt in the cooking process results in less salt consumed than if you put in no salt and hand someone a salt shaker.
If your customers are salting every bite, you've hardly fixed the problem.If he wanted to do the nanny-state properly he should ban customers from having salt shakers and leave salt levels to the experts in the kitchen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443748</id>
	<title>you have all been trolled by this bill</title>
	<author>un1xl0ser</author>
	<datestamp>1268300400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shame on you, you think that internets people would know better.</p><p><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/03/why-the-ny-salt-ban-proposal-is-a-good-idea/37342/" title="theatlantic.com">http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/03/why-the-ny-salt-ban-proposal-is-a-good-idea/37342/</a> [theatlantic.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shame on you , you think that internets people would know better.http : //www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/03/why-the-ny-salt-ban-proposal-is-a-good-idea/37342/ [ theatlantic.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shame on you, you think that internets people would know better.http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/03/why-the-ny-salt-ban-proposal-is-a-good-idea/37342/ [theatlantic.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447308</id>
	<title>Re:Inevitable.</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1268315640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This is inevitable. Not only will we see more of this, but it's going to get a lot more invasive. Politicians have decided it's their responsibility to look out for our well-being.</p></div></blockquote><p>Given that people are asking to be taken care of by the goverment more and more, it's a natural conclusion for the politicians to make.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is inevitable .
Not only will we see more of this , but it 's going to get a lot more invasive .
Politicians have decided it 's their responsibility to look out for our well-being.Given that people are asking to be taken care of by the goverment more and more , it 's a natural conclusion for the politicians to make .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is inevitable.
Not only will we see more of this, but it's going to get a lot more invasive.
Politicians have decided it's their responsibility to look out for our well-being.Given that people are asking to be taken care of by the goverment more and more, it's a natural conclusion for the politicians to make.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443426</id>
	<title>Give us a choice</title>
	<author>ub3r n3u7r4l1st</author>
	<datestamp>1268299440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look, most of the processed food, from caviar to sausage, from cheese to V8, all have salt in it.</p><p>When people go to a restaurant, they are tasting salt...A good cook know exactly how much salt to add to the cream sauce and tomato sauce, gravy and soup. Why would I go to a restaurant if I have to add salt myself?</p><p>Most of all, if you do not like salt...just tell the cook...'No salt please'....</p><p>Or better...go get a head of lettuce and chew on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look , most of the processed food , from caviar to sausage , from cheese to V8 , all have salt in it.When people go to a restaurant , they are tasting salt...A good cook know exactly how much salt to add to the cream sauce and tomato sauce , gravy and soup .
Why would I go to a restaurant if I have to add salt myself ? Most of all , if you do not like salt...just tell the cook...'No salt please'....Or better...go get a head of lettuce and chew on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look, most of the processed food, from caviar to sausage, from cheese to V8, all have salt in it.When people go to a restaurant, they are tasting salt...A good cook know exactly how much salt to add to the cream sauce and tomato sauce, gravy and soup.
Why would I go to a restaurant if I have to add salt myself?Most of all, if you do not like salt...just tell the cook...'No salt please'....Or better...go get a head of lettuce and chew on it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442672</id>
	<title>Better food labeling would be a better law</title>
	<author>presidenteloco</author>
	<datestamp>1268340600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All food products sold in grocery stores should have a simple<br>red, yellow, or green icon prominent on their packaging.</p><p>- Red would be high simple carbs or high salt or has transfats.</p><p>-Yellow would be "iffy foods" which have moderate simple-carb levels,<br>fat levels, and low salt.</p><p>-Green would basically be veggies or very high-fibre carbs or<br>plant protein etc.</p><p>Or the most complex you could go would be separate<br>colors for heart health (lots of salt or fat = bad = red)<br>and metabolic health (lots of simple carbs bad = red)</p><p>So a red heart icon beside a yellow circle would indicate something<br>really bad for your heart if you keep eating them, but so-so for<br>developing diabetes or obesity.</p><p>This would raise awareness, and if you shopped and bought lots<br>of "Green" and some yellows, and maybe one "red" for the week,<br>you'd be a healthy human, diet-wise at least.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All food products sold in grocery stores should have a simplered , yellow , or green icon prominent on their packaging.- Red would be high simple carbs or high salt or has transfats.-Yellow would be " iffy foods " which have moderate simple-carb levels,fat levels , and low salt.-Green would basically be veggies or very high-fibre carbs orplant protein etc.Or the most complex you could go would be separatecolors for heart health ( lots of salt or fat = bad = red ) and metabolic health ( lots of simple carbs bad = red ) So a red heart icon beside a yellow circle would indicate somethingreally bad for your heart if you keep eating them , but so-so fordeveloping diabetes or obesity.This would raise awareness , and if you shopped and bought lotsof " Green " and some yellows , and maybe one " red " for the week,you 'd be a healthy human , diet-wise at least .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All food products sold in grocery stores should have a simplered, yellow, or green icon prominent on their packaging.- Red would be high simple carbs or high salt or has transfats.-Yellow would be "iffy foods" which have moderate simple-carb levels,fat levels, and low salt.-Green would basically be veggies or very high-fibre carbs orplant protein etc.Or the most complex you could go would be separatecolors for heart health (lots of salt or fat = bad = red)and metabolic health (lots of simple carbs bad = red)So a red heart icon beside a yellow circle would indicate somethingreally bad for your heart if you keep eating them, but so-so fordeveloping diabetes or obesity.This would raise awareness, and if you shopped and bought lotsof "Green" and some yellows, and maybe one "red" for the week,you'd be a healthy human, diet-wise at least.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444658</id>
	<title>Don't ban salt</title>
	<author>Jason Levine</author>
	<datestamp>1268303280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>He was prompted to introduce the bill because his father used salt excessively for many years, developed high blood pressure and had a heart attack.</p></div></blockquote><p>No, no, no.  Salt was only a symptom of the underlying problem.  Don't you see?  This person had a *heart attack*, a HEART ATTACK.  Clearly we must ban hearts so as to prevent more attacks of this nature.  Anyone with a heart must be kicked out of New York State!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He was prompted to introduce the bill because his father used salt excessively for many years , developed high blood pressure and had a heart attack.No , no , no .
Salt was only a symptom of the underlying problem .
Do n't you see ?
This person had a * heart attack * , a HEART ATTACK .
Clearly we must ban hearts so as to prevent more attacks of this nature .
Anyone with a heart must be kicked out of New York State !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He was prompted to introduce the bill because his father used salt excessively for many years, developed high blood pressure and had a heart attack.No, no, no.
Salt was only a symptom of the underlying problem.
Don't you see?
This person had a *heart attack*, a HEART ATTACK.
Clearly we must ban hearts so as to prevent more attacks of this nature.
Anyone with a heart must be kicked out of New York State!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31458522</id>
	<title>Over reactions where there should be under</title>
	<author>JobyOne</author>
	<datestamp>1268396940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And vice versa.</p><p>They go apeshit over salt, but can't be bothered to <i>completely</i> remove the sentencing disparity between rock and powder cocaine.</p><p>One is a "think of the children" and one disproportionately targets minorities. Guess which is which?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And vice versa.They go apeshit over salt , but ca n't be bothered to completely remove the sentencing disparity between rock and powder cocaine.One is a " think of the children " and one disproportionately targets minorities .
Guess which is which ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And vice versa.They go apeshit over salt, but can't be bothered to completely remove the sentencing disparity between rock and powder cocaine.One is a "think of the children" and one disproportionately targets minorities.
Guess which is which?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444578</id>
	<title>Re:Finally</title>
	<author>CompMD</author>
	<datestamp>1268303040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sometimes you'll do anything to get a fix.  Maybe you'll try to desalinate seawater to get your salt if you can't get good herbs.</p><p>The lesson here is that if you can't do the thyme, don't do the brine.</p><p>OK, I'll show myself out...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sometimes you 'll do anything to get a fix .
Maybe you 'll try to desalinate seawater to get your salt if you ca n't get good herbs.The lesson here is that if you ca n't do the thyme , do n't do the brine.OK , I 'll show myself out.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sometimes you'll do anything to get a fix.
Maybe you'll try to desalinate seawater to get your salt if you can't get good herbs.The lesson here is that if you can't do the thyme, don't do the brine.OK, I'll show myself out...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252</id>
	<title>Bad ideas last forever</title>
	<author>russotto</author>
	<datestamp>1268339460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem isn't this bill, which won't pass.  The problem is that bad ideas like this, once introduced, have a life of their own.  They keep getting reintroduced until they do pass.  (good ideas, on the other hand, get shelved and are never heard from again).</p><p>They've already assaulted baked goods by banning trans-fats (certain baked goods need shortening for texture).  Ruining everything else, even with a watered-down anti-salt bill, is now inevitable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is n't this bill , which wo n't pass .
The problem is that bad ideas like this , once introduced , have a life of their own .
They keep getting reintroduced until they do pass .
( good ideas , on the other hand , get shelved and are never heard from again ) .They 've already assaulted baked goods by banning trans-fats ( certain baked goods need shortening for texture ) .
Ruining everything else , even with a watered-down anti-salt bill , is now inevitable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem isn't this bill, which won't pass.
The problem is that bad ideas like this, once introduced, have a life of their own.
They keep getting reintroduced until they do pass.
(good ideas, on the other hand, get shelved and are never heard from again).They've already assaulted baked goods by banning trans-fats (certain baked goods need shortening for texture).
Ruining everything else, even with a watered-down anti-salt bill, is now inevitable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442626</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268340480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And raped his mother.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And raped his mother .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And raped his mother.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444170</id>
	<title>Re:Fail</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268301660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chef? Does he really think there's a chef in the TGIFridays kitchen? They reheat pre-made meals.</p><p>People need to learn how to take care of themselves for fucks sake.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chef ?
Does he really think there 's a chef in the TGIFridays kitchen ?
They reheat pre-made meals.People need to learn how to take care of themselves for fucks sake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chef?
Does he really think there's a chef in the TGIFridays kitchen?
They reheat pre-made meals.People need to learn how to take care of themselves for fucks sake.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443228</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442788</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>the\_Bionic\_lemming</author>
	<datestamp>1268340900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Salt killed his father.</i></p><p>So his father was a slug?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Salt killed his father.So his father was a slug ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Salt killed his father.So his father was a slug?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445060</id>
	<title>Nicotine</title>
	<author>nacturation</author>
	<datestamp>1268304720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One thing I've always wondered: why don't they ban nicotine?  Smoke all you want, just mandate to the cigarette manufacturers that they need to produce nicotine-free smokes.  I don't know much about tobacco, so that wouldn't work even in theory if nicotine is near-impossible to remove.  And in practice, it won't work for many many more reasons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One thing I 've always wondered : why do n't they ban nicotine ?
Smoke all you want , just mandate to the cigarette manufacturers that they need to produce nicotine-free smokes .
I do n't know much about tobacco , so that would n't work even in theory if nicotine is near-impossible to remove .
And in practice , it wo n't work for many many more reasons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One thing I've always wondered: why don't they ban nicotine?
Smoke all you want, just mandate to the cigarette manufacturers that they need to produce nicotine-free smokes.
I don't know much about tobacco, so that wouldn't work even in theory if nicotine is near-impossible to remove.
And in practice, it won't work for many many more reasons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442990</id>
	<title>Re:This is just grandstanding.</title>
	<author>wrfelts</author>
	<datestamp>1268298240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...there's no reason to get all worked up about it as it has 0 chance of ever passing.</p></div><p>Not been keeping up with the current healthcare insurance bill, have we?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...there 's no reason to get all worked up about it as it has 0 chance of ever passing.Not been keeping up with the current healthcare insurance bill , have we ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...there's no reason to get all worked up about it as it has 0 chance of ever passing.Not been keeping up with the current healthcare insurance bill, have we?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444668</id>
	<title>Ortiz is an idiot</title>
	<author>knghtrider</author>
	<datestamp>1268303340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously, he knows NOTHING about cooking.. He should be given a crash course by Alton Brown (make watch a 5 day marathon of Good Eats).</p><p>Of course, even worse, this is part of the whole leftist, socialist, 'Goverment knows better than the citizens' attitude that the Democrats have had for decades (not to be confused with the Republican ideology of 'Republcans know better'). </p><p>Nanny State 101---Ban all bad things...soon, all we will be able to eat is lettuce, with vitamin pills. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously , he knows NOTHING about cooking.. He should be given a crash course by Alton Brown ( make watch a 5 day marathon of Good Eats ) .Of course , even worse , this is part of the whole leftist , socialist , 'Goverment knows better than the citizens ' attitude that the Democrats have had for decades ( not to be confused with the Republican ideology of 'Republcans know better ' ) .
Nanny State 101---Ban all bad things...soon , all we will be able to eat is lettuce , with vitamin pills .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously, he knows NOTHING about cooking.. He should be given a crash course by Alton Brown (make watch a 5 day marathon of Good Eats).Of course, even worse, this is part of the whole leftist, socialist, 'Goverment knows better than the citizens' attitude that the Democrats have had for decades (not to be confused with the Republican ideology of 'Republcans know better').
Nanny State 101---Ban all bad things...soon, all we will be able to eat is lettuce, with vitamin pills. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446302</id>
	<title>Re:Inevitable.</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1268309880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is inevitable. Not only will we see more of this, but it's going to get a lot more invasive.</p></div><p>Here in California there is talk of the State having radio control of our home thermostats. It is *literally* tin foil (or some other malleable signal blocker) time.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is inevitable .
Not only will we see more of this , but it 's going to get a lot more invasive.Here in California there is talk of the State having radio control of our home thermostats .
It is * literally * tin foil ( or some other malleable signal blocker ) time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is inevitable.
Not only will we see more of this, but it's going to get a lot more invasive.Here in California there is talk of the State having radio control of our home thermostats.
It is *literally* tin foil (or some other malleable signal blocker) time.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447634</id>
	<title>Re:ummmmm.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268318160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Crow isn't so bad if you load it up with salt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Crow is n't so bad if you load it up with salt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Crow isn't so bad if you load it up with salt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443990</id>
	<title>Guns don't kill people...</title>
	<author>drej</author>
	<datestamp>1268301120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...salt does. Finally someones adressing Americas #1 concern.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...salt does .
Finally someones adressing Americas # 1 concern .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...salt does.
Finally someones adressing Americas #1 concern.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445070</id>
	<title>A bit much</title>
	<author>Starfleet Command</author>
	<datestamp>1268304780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah because without the gov't diapering us and giving us our bottle, we would never make it.  Jeez</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah because without the gov't diapering us and giving us our bottle , we would never make it .
Jeez</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah because without the gov't diapering us and giving us our bottle, we would never make it.
Jeez</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447620</id>
	<title>Re:An alternative:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268318040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because the fucking morons make the laws, and they like job security?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because the fucking morons make the laws , and they like job security ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because the fucking morons make the laws, and they like job security?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443544</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442368</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>lyinhart</author>
	<datestamp>1268339760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>FTA: "Ortiz admits that prior to introducing the bill he did not research salt&rsquo;s role in food chemistry, its effect on flavor or his bill&rsquo;s ramifications for the restaurant industry. He tells me he was prompted to introduce the bill because his father used salt excessively for many years, developed high blood pressure and had a heart attack."<br> <br>

So he's proposing the bill because his own bad personal experience, not because it would benefit his constituents, who probably don't want the bill either. So much for representative government.</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTA : " Ortiz admits that prior to introducing the bill he did not research salt    s role in food chemistry , its effect on flavor or his bill    s ramifications for the restaurant industry .
He tells me he was prompted to introduce the bill because his father used salt excessively for many years , developed high blood pressure and had a heart attack .
" So he 's proposing the bill because his own bad personal experience , not because it would benefit his constituents , who probably do n't want the bill either .
So much for representative government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTA: "Ortiz admits that prior to introducing the bill he did not research salt’s role in food chemistry, its effect on flavor or his bill’s ramifications for the restaurant industry.
He tells me he was prompted to introduce the bill because his father used salt excessively for many years, developed high blood pressure and had a heart attack.
" 

So he's proposing the bill because his own bad personal experience, not because it would benefit his constituents, who probably don't want the bill either.
So much for representative government.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442182</id>
	<title>but</title>
	<author>lastgoodnickname</author>
	<datestamp>1268339340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>but if there's no salt for your hash, doesn't that make your clients and servers less secure?</htmltext>
<tokenext>but if there 's no salt for your hash , does n't that make your clients and servers less secure ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but if there's no salt for your hash, doesn't that make your clients and servers less secure?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448714</id>
	<title>Contact Mr. Oritz about the issue</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268330040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://assembly.state.ny.us/mem/?ad=051&amp;sh=contact" title="state.ny.us" rel="nofollow">Here</a> [state.ny.us]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here [ state.ny.us ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here [state.ny.us]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442364</id>
	<title>This is how government works unfortunately</title>
	<author>aaandre</author>
	<datestamp>1268339760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a great example of the knee-jerk reaction process that the government employs.</p><p>Creating overreaching laws and rules for everyone is very rarely the solution to a problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a great example of the knee-jerk reaction process that the government employs.Creating overreaching laws and rules for everyone is very rarely the solution to a problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a great example of the knee-jerk reaction process that the government employs.Creating overreaching laws and rules for everyone is very rarely the solution to a problem.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444570</id>
	<title>Re:Salt really isn't all that bad...</title>
	<author>Sycraft-fu</author>
	<datestamp>1268302980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Quite true. There is no such thing as a "one size fits all" diet. Also people get confused with something making a problem worse with it causing that thing. Cholesterol is a good example. Everyone seems to think eating certain foods gives you high cholesterol. No, in fact your genetics do. If your genetics are such that you aren't predisposed to it, your diet isn't relevant. Likewise if you are the sort of person who has it, diet may be a factor but not always. In some people with cholesterol problems, simply altering diet does the trick. In others, diet has little to do effect and medication is needed.</p><p>What is the kind of diet that works for one person is not the sort of thing that'll work for another.</p><p>Of course in the case of salt, EVERYONE needs a reasonable amount of salt. No salt = you die.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Quite true .
There is no such thing as a " one size fits all " diet .
Also people get confused with something making a problem worse with it causing that thing .
Cholesterol is a good example .
Everyone seems to think eating certain foods gives you high cholesterol .
No , in fact your genetics do .
If your genetics are such that you are n't predisposed to it , your diet is n't relevant .
Likewise if you are the sort of person who has it , diet may be a factor but not always .
In some people with cholesterol problems , simply altering diet does the trick .
In others , diet has little to do effect and medication is needed.What is the kind of diet that works for one person is not the sort of thing that 'll work for another.Of course in the case of salt , EVERYONE needs a reasonable amount of salt .
No salt = you die .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quite true.
There is no such thing as a "one size fits all" diet.
Also people get confused with something making a problem worse with it causing that thing.
Cholesterol is a good example.
Everyone seems to think eating certain foods gives you high cholesterol.
No, in fact your genetics do.
If your genetics are such that you aren't predisposed to it, your diet isn't relevant.
Likewise if you are the sort of person who has it, diet may be a factor but not always.
In some people with cholesterol problems, simply altering diet does the trick.
In others, diet has little to do effect and medication is needed.What is the kind of diet that works for one person is not the sort of thing that'll work for another.Of course in the case of salt, EVERYONE needs a reasonable amount of salt.
No salt = you die.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442722</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448270
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442528
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_119</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_122</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443544
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_118</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_109</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_112</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444060
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448060
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448910
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31450044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_117</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_120</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_111</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31452410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_107</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_110</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445060
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31452788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443838
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442892
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447574
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443544
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31452840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_126</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31450230
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444260
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_104</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443644
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443694
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_123</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443544
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31449916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31453872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_124</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_115</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446204
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_114</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_116</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_121</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31450912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443162
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443544
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31452502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31451472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31451966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_108</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31450936
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_113</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_127</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31449588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_103</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444570
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_105</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444154
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443752
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_106</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447554
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444578
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_11_1917218_125</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445100
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442314
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448666
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443978
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443474
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442264
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443722
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443426
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442990
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442364
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446526
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442456
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442428
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442788
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442650
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442626
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443168
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442368
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442180
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442934
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445850
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447990
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445722
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446212
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442334
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444918
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442492
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443766
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444060
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444650
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445060
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444774
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448270
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443402
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448910
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444868
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31450044
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446958
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446814
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446704
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31450912
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446934
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446204
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446848
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447830
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446830
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31451966
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448880
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446150
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31450230
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31449588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442400
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443300
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444146
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444088
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443424
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442464
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444410
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443186
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444178
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442352
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446390
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444570
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31452410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447574
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443838
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444370
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444578
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444080
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445176
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31449916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31450936
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447148
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447380
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442688
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442204
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444002
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445172
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448684
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442748
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443266
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442840
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443280
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444396
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444668
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443644
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31453872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444594
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442538
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442194
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445020
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443048
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31445096
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444224
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444154
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447344
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443752
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443228
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444170
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443840
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448066
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442772
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444036
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31452788
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442200
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446894
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443964
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443874
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443694
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443682
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443748
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443890
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442926
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447554
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443386
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443458
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443146
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444260
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443506
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31451472
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448460
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448060
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448170
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443196
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31448818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31444338
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447178
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443992
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443448
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31443544
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31452502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31446136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31452840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447620
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_11_1917218.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31442416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_11_1917218.31447518
</commentlist>
</conversation>
