<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_10_144217</id>
	<title>Study Shows TV Makes Kids Fat, Computers Don't</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1268232180000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Xemu writes <i>"Computers don't make children fat, but <a href="http://translate.google.se/translate?u=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.expressen.se\%2Fhalsa\%2F1.1912420\%2Fdator-pa-rummet-gor-inte-barn-tjocka&amp;sl=sv&amp;tl=en&amp;hl=&amp;ie=UTF-8">watching TV for the same length of time does</a>. This is shown by a recent Swedish study of all school children in Lund's county conducted by RN Pernilla Garmy.  The results were clear: The child's obesity was directly affected by placing a TV in the child's room, but placing a computer in the room had no effect at all. One theory is that it's common to have a snack in front of the TV, while a computer requires a more active user, for example when chatting or playing games."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Xemu writes " Computers do n't make children fat , but watching TV for the same length of time does .
This is shown by a recent Swedish study of all school children in Lund 's county conducted by RN Pernilla Garmy .
The results were clear : The child 's obesity was directly affected by placing a TV in the child 's room , but placing a computer in the room had no effect at all .
One theory is that it 's common to have a snack in front of the TV , while a computer requires a more active user , for example when chatting or playing games .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Xemu writes "Computers don't make children fat, but watching TV for the same length of time does.
This is shown by a recent Swedish study of all school children in Lund's county conducted by RN Pernilla Garmy.
The results were clear: The child's obesity was directly affected by placing a TV in the child's room, but placing a computer in the room had no effect at all.
One theory is that it's common to have a snack in front of the TV, while a computer requires a more active user, for example when chatting or playing games.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425978</id>
	<title>So if I want to get fat quickly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268235900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just have to buy a bunch of TVs in my room, sleep overnight and the next morning I should be very fat right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just have to buy a bunch of TVs in my room , sleep overnight and the next morning I should be very fat right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just have to buy a bunch of TVs in my room, sleep overnight and the next morning I should be very fat right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31433422</id>
	<title>Clearly they never went to a LAN party</title>
	<author>jonwil</author>
	<datestamp>1268230680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clearly the people in this study never went to a LAN party.<br>I used to eat a whole large meat-lovers pizza and 6 cans or so of Coke (the good Australian stuff with REAL sugar) during the course of an afternoon/evening's gaming/file swapping/etc</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly the people in this study never went to a LAN party.I used to eat a whole large meat-lovers pizza and 6 cans or so of Coke ( the good Australian stuff with REAL sugar ) during the course of an afternoon/evening 's gaming/file swapping/etc</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly the people in this study never went to a LAN party.I used to eat a whole large meat-lovers pizza and 6 cans or so of Coke (the good Australian stuff with REAL sugar) during the course of an afternoon/evening's gaming/file swapping/etc</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426630</id>
	<title>Any sedentary activity...</title>
	<author>blahplusplus</author>
	<datestamp>1268238660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... can make you fat if you do too much of it, moderation and monitoring of what you eat vs the energy you expend is what counts.</p><p>You can lose weight in marathon gaming sessions, I know I've lost a few pounds over weekends with huge long games of Civ4 or Galciv 2.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... can make you fat if you do too much of it , moderation and monitoring of what you eat vs the energy you expend is what counts.You can lose weight in marathon gaming sessions , I know I 've lost a few pounds over weekends with huge long games of Civ4 or Galciv 2 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... can make you fat if you do too much of it, moderation and monitoring of what you eat vs the energy you expend is what counts.You can lose weight in marathon gaming sessions, I know I've lost a few pounds over weekends with huge long games of Civ4 or Galciv 2.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425954</id>
	<title>I knew it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268235780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Computers are awesome.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Computers are awesome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Computers are awesome.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427506</id>
	<title>TV makes kids eat carbs, and Computers Don't</title>
	<author>hsthompson69</author>
	<datestamp>1268242620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Taking the reckless assertion of causality train one step further, since we know that obesity is directly controlled by carbohydrate intake, we can now make the statement that TV obviously causes children to eat carbohydrates, and computers don't.</p><p>For those unfamiliar with the Kreb's Cycle, and the direct causation of obesity by carbohydrate intake, it works like this:</p><p>-only one hormone causes fat cells to accumulate fat, rather than to process fatty acids normally both from and to the bloodstream - insulin</p><p>-only one thing causes an increase of insulin levels - blood sugar</p><p>-only one thing causes an increase of blood sugar - carbohydrate intake</p><p>Usually, your fat cells process fatty acids, taking them in and then pushing them back out into the bloodstream.  Under the condition of insulin resistance, the fat cells behave in an abnormal manner, and steal energy from the bloodstream, but don't release it back in.  This causes the starvation of other cells.  So when you see a 400 pound fat man eating a pizza like he's starving, it's because his muscle cells are being starved by his out of control fat cells.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Taking the reckless assertion of causality train one step further , since we know that obesity is directly controlled by carbohydrate intake , we can now make the statement that TV obviously causes children to eat carbohydrates , and computers do n't.For those unfamiliar with the Kreb 's Cycle , and the direct causation of obesity by carbohydrate intake , it works like this : -only one hormone causes fat cells to accumulate fat , rather than to process fatty acids normally both from and to the bloodstream - insulin-only one thing causes an increase of insulin levels - blood sugar-only one thing causes an increase of blood sugar - carbohydrate intakeUsually , your fat cells process fatty acids , taking them in and then pushing them back out into the bloodstream .
Under the condition of insulin resistance , the fat cells behave in an abnormal manner , and steal energy from the bloodstream , but do n't release it back in .
This causes the starvation of other cells .
So when you see a 400 pound fat man eating a pizza like he 's starving , it 's because his muscle cells are being starved by his out of control fat cells .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Taking the reckless assertion of causality train one step further, since we know that obesity is directly controlled by carbohydrate intake, we can now make the statement that TV obviously causes children to eat carbohydrates, and computers don't.For those unfamiliar with the Kreb's Cycle, and the direct causation of obesity by carbohydrate intake, it works like this:-only one hormone causes fat cells to accumulate fat, rather than to process fatty acids normally both from and to the bloodstream - insulin-only one thing causes an increase of insulin levels - blood sugar-only one thing causes an increase of blood sugar - carbohydrate intakeUsually, your fat cells process fatty acids, taking them in and then pushing them back out into the bloodstream.
Under the condition of insulin resistance, the fat cells behave in an abnormal manner, and steal energy from the bloodstream, but don't release it back in.
This causes the starvation of other cells.
So when you see a 400 pound fat man eating a pizza like he's starving, it's because his muscle cells are being starved by his out of control fat cells.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429540</id>
	<title>Old experiment</title>
	<author>spitzak</author>
	<datestamp>1268252280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember hearing about an experiment, using measurements of oxygen consumption, that showed that a human sitting in a chair watching TV burned less calories than a human sitting in a chair doing nothing! Does anybody remember this and can find any references? I think the experiment was quite old so there was no test of using a computer, but it may be related to this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember hearing about an experiment , using measurements of oxygen consumption , that showed that a human sitting in a chair watching TV burned less calories than a human sitting in a chair doing nothing !
Does anybody remember this and can find any references ?
I think the experiment was quite old so there was no test of using a computer , but it may be related to this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember hearing about an experiment, using measurements of oxygen consumption, that showed that a human sitting in a chair watching TV burned less calories than a human sitting in a chair doing nothing!
Does anybody remember this and can find any references?
I think the experiment was quite old so there was no test of using a computer, but it may be related to this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429096</id>
	<title>Re:Apostrophe's</title>
	<author>Heywood Jablonski</author>
	<datestamp>1268250180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Incorrect conjugation of verbs also make<b>s</b> baby Jesus cry.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Incorrect conjugation of verbs also makes baby Jesus cry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Incorrect conjugation of verbs also makes baby Jesus cry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426994</id>
	<title>But...?</title>
	<author>Eggbloke</author>
	<datestamp>1268240280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I watch TV on the computer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I watch TV on the computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I watch TV on the computer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31430072</id>
	<title>Class Issue?</title>
	<author>Cendrivian</author>
	<datestamp>1268254560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext> Or, perhaps it could be that families who typically have enough money for computers for their children also have enough money/time to buy and prepare healthy meals?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , perhaps it could be that families who typically have enough money for computers for their children also have enough money/time to buy and prepare healthy meals ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Or, perhaps it could be that families who typically have enough money for computers for their children also have enough money/time to buy and prepare healthy meals?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428486</id>
	<title>Re:Apostrophe's</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268247300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You forgot two: "Abu'se" and "apo'strope's".<br>As somebody else mentioned some time ago, an apostrophe means "Caution, S ahead!"<br>After all, an S is difficult to navigate as we all know, and it's easy to fly off the track.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot two : " Abu'se " and " apo'strope 's " .As somebody else mentioned some time ago , an apostrophe means " Caution , S ahead !
" After all , an S is difficult to navigate as we all know , and it 's easy to fly off the track .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot two: "Abu'se" and "apo'strope's".As somebody else mentioned some time ago, an apostrophe means "Caution, S ahead!
"After all, an S is difficult to navigate as we all know, and it's easy to fly off the track.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427360</id>
	<title>Re:IS there a link to the study?</title>
	<author>houghi</author>
	<datestamp>1268241840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reminds me of a study that showed that watching TV burned less calories then doing nothing. If you do nothing, you will move around more then watching tv. You move around a lot more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of a study that showed that watching TV burned less calories then doing nothing .
If you do nothing , you will move around more then watching tv .
You move around a lot more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of a study that showed that watching TV burned less calories then doing nothing.
If you do nothing, you will move around more then watching tv.
You move around a lot more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31435242</id>
	<title>YouTube makes me fat :(</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268339400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I eat chips while watching YouTube *YUM*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I eat chips while watching YouTube * YUM *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I eat chips while watching YouTube *YUM*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427058</id>
	<title>simple really...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268240520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>computer = active mind<br>television = vegetative state</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>computer = active mindtelevision = vegetative state</tokentext>
<sentencetext>computer = active mindtelevision = vegetative state</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426476</id>
	<title>can we get a real study ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268238060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>instead of the google translation of a 2 paragraphs-long article ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>instead of the google translation of a 2 paragraphs-long article ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>instead of the google translation of a 2 paragraphs-long article ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425974</id>
	<title>What about my Slingbox?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268235840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's TV on the computer!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's TV on the computer !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's TV on the computer!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426452</id>
	<title>Typing keeps...</title>
	<author>sophomoric</author>
	<datestamp>1268237940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Typing keeps your hands busy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Typing keeps your hands busy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Typing keeps your hands busy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428414</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268247060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The brain burns up to 30\% of calories that we burn and when intensive thought is required, such as learning or puzzling out a game, brain caloric burn can increase by 50\%. While brain activity is lower for reproducing a learned activity, computer games generally are engaging because they require learning new activities constantly. This would indicate that in general brain caloric burn is in the heightened state while using the computer. Matched with less caloric intake through snacks it would seem likely that PCs != Fatties.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The brain burns up to 30 \ % of calories that we burn and when intensive thought is required , such as learning or puzzling out a game , brain caloric burn can increase by 50 \ % .
While brain activity is lower for reproducing a learned activity , computer games generally are engaging because they require learning new activities constantly .
This would indicate that in general brain caloric burn is in the heightened state while using the computer .
Matched with less caloric intake through snacks it would seem likely that PCs ! = Fatties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The brain burns up to 30\% of calories that we burn and when intensive thought is required, such as learning or puzzling out a game, brain caloric burn can increase by 50\%.
While brain activity is lower for reproducing a learned activity, computer games generally are engaging because they require learning new activities constantly.
This would indicate that in general brain caloric burn is in the heightened state while using the computer.
Matched with less caloric intake through snacks it would seem likely that PCs != Fatties.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426064</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>Tobenisstinky</author>
	<datestamp>1268236380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember a study (sorry no citation) that found that sleeping burns more calories than watching TV.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember a study ( sorry no citation ) that found that sleeping burns more calories than watching TV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember a study (sorry no citation) that found that sleeping burns more calories than watching TV.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426716</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>JWSmythe</author>
	<datestamp>1268239080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; I strongly suspect that the dumber part would apply to what the subject was watching.   Sure, an American Idol marathon followed by countless hours of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... well, a vast array of mindless television designed to fill the airwaves slightly better than a test pattern, could dumb the subject down just below the IQ of a rock (my apologies to the rocks for the implied insult).</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Some shows are educational, either in their direct education value (documentaries) or through making you think harder (some dramas and comedies).  The later category falls way behind though.  Those stuck in a particular genre and continue to watch it even after they can predict the ending from the first few minutes, need to change to something new they can learn from.  I've had some fun with that, watching a couple minutes of a show, blurting out "The wife did it", and walking out to do something more constructive.  It always throws people when I'm right.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)  Of course, it takes them 30 to 60 minutes to find out, while I've done something more constructive (built sometime, surfed internet porn, whatever).</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; The same can be said for games.  Ok, maybe you've become the worlds greatest Solitaire or Minesweeper player.  Great.  Move on to something else.  Maybe write your own version.  Online.  With a live connection to a real minefield.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Too many people prefer to do something they're comfortable with, and let their mind idle, rather than expand.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. and I say that as I'm reading Slashdot.  Maybe I should go do something more constructive too.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>    I strongly suspect that the dumber part would apply to what the subject was watching .
Sure , an American Idol marathon followed by countless hours of ... well , a vast array of mindless television designed to fill the airwaves slightly better than a test pattern , could dumb the subject down just below the IQ of a rock ( my apologies to the rocks for the implied insult ) .
    Some shows are educational , either in their direct education value ( documentaries ) or through making you think harder ( some dramas and comedies ) .
The later category falls way behind though .
Those stuck in a particular genre and continue to watch it even after they can predict the ending from the first few minutes , need to change to something new they can learn from .
I 've had some fun with that , watching a couple minutes of a show , blurting out " The wife did it " , and walking out to do something more constructive .
It always throws people when I 'm right .
: ) Of course , it takes them 30 to 60 minutes to find out , while I 've done something more constructive ( built sometime , surfed internet porn , whatever ) .
    The same can be said for games .
Ok , maybe you 've become the worlds greatest Solitaire or Minesweeper player .
Great. Move on to something else .
Maybe write your own version .
Online. With a live connection to a real minefield .
: )     Too many people prefer to do something they 're comfortable with , and let their mind idle , rather than expand .
.. and I say that as I 'm reading Slashdot .
Maybe I should go do something more constructive too .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
    I strongly suspect that the dumber part would apply to what the subject was watching.
Sure, an American Idol marathon followed by countless hours of ... well, a vast array of mindless television designed to fill the airwaves slightly better than a test pattern, could dumb the subject down just below the IQ of a rock (my apologies to the rocks for the implied insult).
    Some shows are educational, either in their direct education value (documentaries) or through making you think harder (some dramas and comedies).
The later category falls way behind though.
Those stuck in a particular genre and continue to watch it even after they can predict the ending from the first few minutes, need to change to something new they can learn from.
I've had some fun with that, watching a couple minutes of a show, blurting out "The wife did it", and walking out to do something more constructive.
It always throws people when I'm right.
:)  Of course, it takes them 30 to 60 minutes to find out, while I've done something more constructive (built sometime, surfed internet porn, whatever).
    The same can be said for games.
Ok, maybe you've become the worlds greatest Solitaire or Minesweeper player.
Great.  Move on to something else.
Maybe write your own version.
Online.  With a live connection to a real minefield.
:)
    Too many people prefer to do something they're comfortable with, and let their mind idle, rather than expand.
.. and I say that as I'm reading Slashdot.
Maybe I should go do something more constructive too.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426488</id>
	<title>Calories burned during brain activity</title>
	<author>ehud42</author>
	<datestamp>1268238120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An interesting way to validate this study would be a lab controlled experiment where people are connected to a calorie consumption monitor while either watching tv (track "entertainment" vs "educational" programming), using a computer (track "working - coding, writing docs, etc." vs "gaming" vs "reading"), or reading (track "news paper" vs "fictional novel").</p><p>Brains use a fair bit of calories thinking and processing information. Should be easy enough to prove (or disprove) that watching TV requires fewer calories.</p><p>What you eat while performing these activities probably has a greater impact on your weight - which is what the article is probably referring to. I'd read it, but I'm trying to lose weight and think that posting consumes more calories then reading<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An interesting way to validate this study would be a lab controlled experiment where people are connected to a calorie consumption monitor while either watching tv ( track " entertainment " vs " educational " programming ) , using a computer ( track " working - coding , writing docs , etc .
" vs " gaming " vs " reading " ) , or reading ( track " news paper " vs " fictional novel " ) .Brains use a fair bit of calories thinking and processing information .
Should be easy enough to prove ( or disprove ) that watching TV requires fewer calories.What you eat while performing these activities probably has a greater impact on your weight - which is what the article is probably referring to .
I 'd read it , but I 'm trying to lose weight and think that posting consumes more calories then reading : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An interesting way to validate this study would be a lab controlled experiment where people are connected to a calorie consumption monitor while either watching tv (track "entertainment" vs "educational" programming), using a computer (track "working - coding, writing docs, etc.
" vs "gaming" vs "reading"), or reading (track "news paper" vs "fictional novel").Brains use a fair bit of calories thinking and processing information.
Should be easy enough to prove (or disprove) that watching TV requires fewer calories.What you eat while performing these activities probably has a greater impact on your weight - which is what the article is probably referring to.
I'd read it, but I'm trying to lose weight and think that posting consumes more calories then reading :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31430020</id>
	<title>Hands free TV</title>
	<author>Cro Magnon</author>
	<datestamp>1268254320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While watching TV, I can cram food down my throat with both hands.  I might have to put one of my snacks down to FF past a commercial.</p><p>On the computer, I have at least one hand on the mouse.  If I'm watch pr0n, my other hand might also be occupied.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While watching TV , I can cram food down my throat with both hands .
I might have to put one of my snacks down to FF past a commercial.On the computer , I have at least one hand on the mouse .
If I 'm watch pr0n , my other hand might also be occupied .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While watching TV, I can cram food down my throat with both hands.
I might have to put one of my snacks down to FF past a commercial.On the computer, I have at least one hand on the mouse.
If I'm watch pr0n, my other hand might also be occupied.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428126</id>
	<title>Re:Apostrophe's</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268245380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A.Noncoward spotted this on the firehose submission; presumably no-one reads those?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A.Noncoward spotted this on the firehose submission ; presumably no-one reads those ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A.Noncoward spotted this on the firehose submission; presumably no-one reads those?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427346</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268241780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What are you trying to say?</p><p>Watching TV makes people dumber/Dumber people watch more TV.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What are you trying to say ? Watching TV makes people dumber/Dumber people watch more TV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What are you trying to say?Watching TV makes people dumber/Dumber people watch more TV.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426240</id>
	<title>We already knew that geeks are skinny...</title>
	<author>captainpanic</author>
	<datestamp>1268237040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The real news is that this is not because of lack of exercise, but because of lack of food.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The real news is that this is not because of lack of exercise , but because of lack of food .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real news is that this is not because of lack of exercise, but because of lack of food.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426546</id>
	<title>food</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268238300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure that eating too much food makes kids fat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure that eating too much food makes kids fat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure that eating too much food makes kids fat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429034</id>
	<title>Re:Apostrophe's</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1268249820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif" title="angryflower.com">Bob</a> [angryflower.com] has a few things to say about <a href="http://www.angryflower.com/destro.html" title="angryflower.com">apostrophes.</a> [angryflower.com] And <a href="http://www.angryflower.com/plural.gif" title="angryflower.com">"plural's"</a> [angryflower.com] as well.</p><p>Abuse of apostrophes makes one look like an illiterate. I don't even know if they had apostrophes in ancient Araimic or Hebrew.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bob [ angryflower.com ] has a few things to say about apostrophes .
[ angryflower.com ] And " plural 's " [ angryflower.com ] as well.Abuse of apostrophes makes one look like an illiterate .
I do n't even know if they had apostrophes in ancient Araimic or Hebrew .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bob [angryflower.com] has a few things to say about apostrophes.
[angryflower.com] And "plural's" [angryflower.com] as well.Abuse of apostrophes makes one look like an illiterate.
I don't even know if they had apostrophes in ancient Araimic or Hebrew.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426380</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>beh</author>
	<datestamp>1268237640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That coming from a computer user - I bet, most people zoning out in front of the TV will object to your analysis...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...likely even claim, that zoning out in front of the TV teaches you more than zoning out in front of World of Warcraft...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><p>Neither would automatically be right, but it's just the reflex action assuming it's the other side who is the more stupid one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That coming from a computer user - I bet , most people zoning out in front of the TV will object to your analysis... ...likely even claim , that zoning out in front of the TV teaches you more than zoning out in front of World of Warcraft... ; - ) Neither would automatically be right , but it 's just the reflex action assuming it 's the other side who is the more stupid one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That coming from a computer user - I bet, most people zoning out in front of the TV will object to your analysis... ...likely even claim, that zoning out in front of the TV teaches you more than zoning out in front of World of Warcraft... ;-)Neither would automatically be right, but it's just the reflex action assuming it's the other side who is the more stupid one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429790</id>
	<title>Follow up questions</title>
	<author>asylumx</author>
	<datestamp>1268253360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>1. How do the results change if the TV has a video game console attached?<br>
1a. What if it's a PS3/XBox vs. a Wii (implying that a Wii takes more physical activity)<br>
2. How do these results compare to a child who has neither a TV nor a computer in his bedroom?</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
How do the results change if the TV has a video game console attached ?
1a. What if it 's a PS3/XBox vs. a Wii ( implying that a Wii takes more physical activity ) 2 .
How do these results compare to a child who has neither a TV nor a computer in his bedroom ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
How do the results change if the TV has a video game console attached?
1a. What if it's a PS3/XBox vs. a Wii (implying that a Wii takes more physical activity)
2.
How do these results compare to a child who has neither a TV nor a computer in his bedroom?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31433096</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>w0mprat</author>
	<datestamp>1268228160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Junk food advertising? Dumber also leads to less resistance to the constant bombardment of junk food advertising. There is also agressive product placement in primetime TV in the US at least.
<br> <br>
I have observed actors in American TV, in particular bog standard sitcoms, are always eating and going to the fridge, or at least there is a fridge or a vending machine nearby, or the actors go and get takeout for no apparent advancement to the story. This doesn't seem to happen to the same frequency in an overseas equivelent show. Indeed it seems almost absent in the top few primetime shows in my area, that is, only occuring where it's natural background to the story (ie characters are in a restaurant on a date), and not stand-out unecessarily added in.
<br> <br>
I have no doubt this would have some subliminal effect encouraging people to eat. How convient there will be junk food advertising in the ad breaks then.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Junk food advertising ?
Dumber also leads to less resistance to the constant bombardment of junk food advertising .
There is also agressive product placement in primetime TV in the US at least .
I have observed actors in American TV , in particular bog standard sitcoms , are always eating and going to the fridge , or at least there is a fridge or a vending machine nearby , or the actors go and get takeout for no apparent advancement to the story .
This does n't seem to happen to the same frequency in an overseas equivelent show .
Indeed it seems almost absent in the top few primetime shows in my area , that is , only occuring where it 's natural background to the story ( ie characters are in a restaurant on a date ) , and not stand-out unecessarily added in .
I have no doubt this would have some subliminal effect encouraging people to eat .
How convient there will be junk food advertising in the ad breaks then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Junk food advertising?
Dumber also leads to less resistance to the constant bombardment of junk food advertising.
There is also agressive product placement in primetime TV in the US at least.
I have observed actors in American TV, in particular bog standard sitcoms, are always eating and going to the fridge, or at least there is a fridge or a vending machine nearby, or the actors go and get takeout for no apparent advancement to the story.
This doesn't seem to happen to the same frequency in an overseas equivelent show.
Indeed it seems almost absent in the top few primetime shows in my area, that is, only occuring where it's natural background to the story (ie characters are in a restaurant on a date), and not stand-out unecessarily added in.
I have no doubt this would have some subliminal effect encouraging people to eat.
How convient there will be junk food advertising in the ad breaks then.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426536</id>
	<title>Sounds simple enough to me</title>
	<author>valadaar</author>
	<datestamp>1268238240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I'm bored, I am more likely to eat.  When I'm wasting enemies in Team Fortress 2 (ok, being wasted, but hey), the last thing I'm going to do is get up and get a snack.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I 'm bored , I am more likely to eat .
When I 'm wasting enemies in Team Fortress 2 ( ok , being wasted , but hey ) , the last thing I 'm going to do is get up and get a snack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I'm bored, I am more likely to eat.
When I'm wasting enemies in Team Fortress 2 (ok, being wasted, but hey), the last thing I'm going to do is get up and get a snack.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426894</id>
	<title>One obvious point:</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1268239920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The TV fosters passivity. Cattle mentality.<br>The Internet is more for active people. Not necessarily with the body (apart from porn), but with the brain. It supports active participation. Look at how it already changed government and the media. People stop being cattle because of it.</p><p>Also, if you have ever played Q3 CPMA or Richard Burns Rally (on a force feedback wheel) for a couple of hours, you&rsquo;ll know that you get hot and sweat like a pig from the stress. (The heat is proof for the burning of energy.)</p><p>Also a very important thing to note is, that not being fat does not mean being healthy. It can mean you are simply so thing because you&rsquo;re too lazy to even eat. It&rsquo;s obvious that that will kill you in the long run, or case bad long-term diseases. Just like bad food. The lack of sports is still much bigger than with e.g. an outdoor sport.</p><p>But hey, I&rsquo;m working on affordable outdoor computer games that require movement right now! Wish me luck!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The TV fosters passivity .
Cattle mentality.The Internet is more for active people .
Not necessarily with the body ( apart from porn ) , but with the brain .
It supports active participation .
Look at how it already changed government and the media .
People stop being cattle because of it.Also , if you have ever played Q3 CPMA or Richard Burns Rally ( on a force feedback wheel ) for a couple of hours , you    ll know that you get hot and sweat like a pig from the stress .
( The heat is proof for the burning of energy .
) Also a very important thing to note is , that not being fat does not mean being healthy .
It can mean you are simply so thing because you    re too lazy to even eat .
It    s obvious that that will kill you in the long run , or case bad long-term diseases .
Just like bad food .
The lack of sports is still much bigger than with e.g .
an outdoor sport.But hey , I    m working on affordable outdoor computer games that require movement right now !
Wish me luck !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The TV fosters passivity.
Cattle mentality.The Internet is more for active people.
Not necessarily with the body (apart from porn), but with the brain.
It supports active participation.
Look at how it already changed government and the media.
People stop being cattle because of it.Also, if you have ever played Q3 CPMA or Richard Burns Rally (on a force feedback wheel) for a couple of hours, you’ll know that you get hot and sweat like a pig from the stress.
(The heat is proof for the burning of energy.
)Also a very important thing to note is, that not being fat does not mean being healthy.
It can mean you are simply so thing because you’re too lazy to even eat.
It’s obvious that that will kill you in the long run, or case bad long-term diseases.
Just like bad food.
The lack of sports is still much bigger than with e.g.
an outdoor sport.But hey, I’m working on affordable outdoor computer games that require movement right now!
Wish me luck!
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427416</id>
	<title>But really...</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1268242080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it depends on how many times you lift them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it depends on how many times you lift them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it depends on how many times you lift them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426548</id>
	<title>Re:I knew it</title>
	<author>bennomatic</author>
	<datestamp>1268238300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, and the Internet?  I think it might be time to take it seriously.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , and the Internet ?
I think it might be time to take it seriously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, and the Internet?
I think it might be time to take it seriously.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427424</id>
	<title>Suggestion and theory of fat accumulation key</title>
	<author>cbarcus</author>
	<datestamp>1268242140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is some scientific disagreement over the nature of fat accumulation (consider Gary Taubes landmark book <b>Good Calories, Bad Calories</b>), and I would think that this plays an important role in how the culture views the qualities of various foods. Furthermore, as has been mentioned in other posts, TV ads are designed to affect those who watch them. It is non-trivial to resist the sophisticated suggestions (see Boris Sidis' <b>The Psychology of Suggestion 1898</b>) that vulnerable people encounter in broadcast media.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is some scientific disagreement over the nature of fat accumulation ( consider Gary Taubes landmark book Good Calories , Bad Calories ) , and I would think that this plays an important role in how the culture views the qualities of various foods .
Furthermore , as has been mentioned in other posts , TV ads are designed to affect those who watch them .
It is non-trivial to resist the sophisticated suggestions ( see Boris Sidis ' The Psychology of Suggestion 1898 ) that vulnerable people encounter in broadcast media .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is some scientific disagreement over the nature of fat accumulation (consider Gary Taubes landmark book Good Calories, Bad Calories), and I would think that this plays an important role in how the culture views the qualities of various foods.
Furthermore, as has been mentioned in other posts, TV ads are designed to affect those who watch them.
It is non-trivial to resist the sophisticated suggestions (see Boris Sidis' The Psychology of Suggestion 1898) that vulnerable people encounter in broadcast media.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428272</id>
	<title>TVs don't make computers fat!</title>
	<author>davidwr</author>
	<datestamp>1268246280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Consuming more calories than you burn or apply to normal growth makes you fat!</p><p>100 kids surveyed:<br>How many kids have consumed a computer:  0<br>How many kids have consumed a television: 0</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Consuming more calories than you burn or apply to normal growth makes you fat ! 100 kids surveyed : How many kids have consumed a computer : 0How many kids have consumed a television : 0</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Consuming more calories than you burn or apply to normal growth makes you fat!100 kids surveyed:How many kids have consumed a computer:  0How many kids have consumed a television: 0</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428772</id>
	<title>Re:IS there a link to the study?</title>
	<author>Belial6</author>
	<datestamp>1268248680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The lack of good studies is because these studies are almost always done for religious reasons.  Group X finds activity Y to be immoral, so they conduct a "study" that "proves" their point.  As you point out, even when there is a correlation, they never try to hunt down or isolate the cause.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The lack of good studies is because these studies are almost always done for religious reasons .
Group X finds activity Y to be immoral , so they conduct a " study " that " proves " their point .
As you point out , even when there is a correlation , they never try to hunt down or isolate the cause .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The lack of good studies is because these studies are almost always done for religious reasons.
Group X finds activity Y to be immoral, so they conduct a "study" that "proves" their point.
As you point out, even when there is a correlation, they never try to hunt down or isolate the cause.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429742</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>centuren</author>
	<datestamp>1268253180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The article is likely correct about the snacks and food.  Also, no offense intended to anyone, but I've noticed that people who just zone out to television as compared to active computer users/gamers tend to be a bit...dumber.</p><p>Yes yes, I know, a generalization...but in my experience, it's the truth.</p></div><p>It's worth pointing out that in this day and age, if a kid has a TV in his room, he's extremely likely to have an XBox as well. So the real story is that console gaming makes you fat, PC gaming doesn't. (Sitting up works those abdominal muscles!)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article is likely correct about the snacks and food .
Also , no offense intended to anyone , but I 've noticed that people who just zone out to television as compared to active computer users/gamers tend to be a bit...dumber.Yes yes , I know , a generalization...but in my experience , it 's the truth.It 's worth pointing out that in this day and age , if a kid has a TV in his room , he 's extremely likely to have an XBox as well .
So the real story is that console gaming makes you fat , PC gaming does n't .
( Sitting up works those abdominal muscles !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article is likely correct about the snacks and food.
Also, no offense intended to anyone, but I've noticed that people who just zone out to television as compared to active computer users/gamers tend to be a bit...dumber.Yes yes, I know, a generalization...but in my experience, it's the truth.It's worth pointing out that in this day and age, if a kid has a TV in his room, he's extremely likely to have an XBox as well.
So the real story is that console gaming makes you fat, PC gaming doesn't.
(Sitting up works those abdominal muscles!
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426440</id>
	<title>Obviously it's the advertising</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268237940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's so obvious why. The TV blasts you with ads for junk food every ten minutes. Ads the internet are just not as effective at getting you to eat crap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's so obvious why .
The TV blasts you with ads for junk food every ten minutes .
Ads the internet are just not as effective at getting you to eat crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's so obvious why.
The TV blasts you with ads for junk food every ten minutes.
Ads the internet are just not as effective at getting you to eat crap.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31435286</id>
	<title>It's the Jenna Jameson fitness program...</title>
	<author>Modern Primate</author>
	<datestamp>1268340000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah well, at least downloading porn involves a little bit of exercise.  With TV you just lay there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah well , at least downloading porn involves a little bit of exercise .
With TV you just lay there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah well, at least downloading porn involves a little bit of exercise.
With TV you just lay there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31434536</id>
	<title>Proof</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268242320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I lost 25 kilos last year, and a significant part of the plan was keeping myself busy with PC's rather than watching TV.</p><p>Its all about the advertisements on TV.</p><p>It really is a horrorshow watching all those TV ads after you have not sone it for a while. You become conscious of how much garbage they try to literally force down your throats.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I lost 25 kilos last year , and a significant part of the plan was keeping myself busy with PC 's rather than watching TV.Its all about the advertisements on TV.It really is a horrorshow watching all those TV ads after you have not sone it for a while .
You become conscious of how much garbage they try to literally force down your throats .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I lost 25 kilos last year, and a significant part of the plan was keeping myself busy with PC's rather than watching TV.Its all about the advertisements on TV.It really is a horrorshow watching all those TV ads after you have not sone it for a while.
You become conscious of how much garbage they try to literally force down your throats.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31430006</id>
	<title>Re:Computer Awesome</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268254320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I dont think this, computer can do a better brain, but always i dont exercise my body.
I work hours behind the computer and i need very much fresh air...
<a href="http://www.laclase.net/" title="laclase.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.laclase.net/</a> [laclase.net]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I dont think this , computer can do a better brain , but always i dont exercise my body .
I work hours behind the computer and i need very much fresh air.. . http : //www.laclase.net/ [ laclase.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dont think this, computer can do a better brain, but always i dont exercise my body.
I work hours behind the computer and i need very much fresh air...
http://www.laclase.net/ [laclase.net]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427888</id>
	<title>Re:I knew it</title>
	<author>Richy\_T</author>
	<datestamp>1268244240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And low calorie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And low calorie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And low calorie.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427126</id>
	<title>What if it's the heart rate?</title>
	<author>Xaedalus</author>
	<datestamp>1268240820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So when I'm gaming, and up against a big boss, my heart rate goes through the roof. I may be stationary, but my heart's pounding like I'm in a fight, I'm sweating, and my body's in fight mode. In my opinion and experience, I'm burning more calories (relatively speaking) gaming than I am just sitting and watching TV.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So when I 'm gaming , and up against a big boss , my heart rate goes through the roof .
I may be stationary , but my heart 's pounding like I 'm in a fight , I 'm sweating , and my body 's in fight mode .
In my opinion and experience , I 'm burning more calories ( relatively speaking ) gaming than I am just sitting and watching TV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So when I'm gaming, and up against a big boss, my heart rate goes through the roof.
I may be stationary, but my heart's pounding like I'm in a fight, I'm sweating, and my body's in fight mode.
In my opinion and experience, I'm burning more calories (relatively speaking) gaming than I am just sitting and watching TV.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429092</id>
	<title>It's not the TV, per se. ...</title>
	<author>Morpork</author>
	<datestamp>1268250120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> but the \_commercials\_</p><p>When paying/working/whatever on a computer you're generally focussed and have a general control over what you see/do.</p><p>On TV, especially kids TV, any program you're watching is frequently interrupted by images and messages about junk food, snacks, sodas, sugar-laden juice drinks, etc.</p><p>I contend that it is this (subliminal" maybe) messaging that's leading to obesity as much, if nor more so, than just the sedentary nature of watching TV.</p><p>Change the computer so that every for 2 out of every 8 minutes of usage your computer screen is replaced with images of BigMacs, Whoppers, Coke, Skittles, etc., etc. and I BET that all those non-fat computer kids will get fat pretty quickly.</p><p>Damn, did I just give the junk food industry a new target to aim for?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but the \ _commercials \ _When paying/working/whatever on a computer you 're generally focussed and have a general control over what you see/do.On TV , especially kids TV , any program you 're watching is frequently interrupted by images and messages about junk food , snacks , sodas , sugar-laden juice drinks , etc.I contend that it is this ( subliminal " maybe ) messaging that 's leading to obesity as much , if nor more so , than just the sedentary nature of watching TV.Change the computer so that every for 2 out of every 8 minutes of usage your computer screen is replaced with images of BigMacs , Whoppers , Coke , Skittles , etc. , etc .
and I BET that all those non-fat computer kids will get fat pretty quickly.Damn , did I just give the junk food industry a new target to aim for ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> but the \_commercials\_When paying/working/whatever on a computer you're generally focussed and have a general control over what you see/do.On TV, especially kids TV, any program you're watching is frequently interrupted by images and messages about junk food, snacks, sodas, sugar-laden juice drinks, etc.I contend that it is this (subliminal" maybe) messaging that's leading to obesity as much, if nor more so, than just the sedentary nature of watching TV.Change the computer so that every for 2 out of every 8 minutes of usage your computer screen is replaced with images of BigMacs, Whoppers, Coke, Skittles, etc., etc.
and I BET that all those non-fat computer kids will get fat pretty quickly.Damn, did I just give the junk food industry a new target to aim for?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428066</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268245140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The reason I don't eat at a computer is because I hate having greasy/sticky hands (this is not OCD; I'm not nuts about germs, I just hate the slimy/sticky feeling). Just about any snack will make hands greasy or sticky, so the only snack I eat at the computer is raisins with a fork.</p><p>Oh, and I don't watch TV, at all, *ever*. I just don't see the point of sitting doing nothing with my brain except trying to be sold stuff for 50\% of the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason I do n't eat at a computer is because I hate having greasy/sticky hands ( this is not OCD ; I 'm not nuts about germs , I just hate the slimy/sticky feeling ) .
Just about any snack will make hands greasy or sticky , so the only snack I eat at the computer is raisins with a fork.Oh , and I do n't watch TV , at all , * ever * .
I just do n't see the point of sitting doing nothing with my brain except trying to be sold stuff for 50 \ % of the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason I don't eat at a computer is because I hate having greasy/sticky hands (this is not OCD; I'm not nuts about germs, I just hate the slimy/sticky feeling).
Just about any snack will make hands greasy or sticky, so the only snack I eat at the computer is raisins with a fork.Oh, and I don't watch TV, at all, *ever*.
I just don't see the point of sitting doing nothing with my brain except trying to be sold stuff for 50\% of the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427442</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268242320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Zoning out" from Blackburrow in Everquest taught me a lot!  TRAIN TO ZONE!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Zoning out " from Blackburrow in Everquest taught me a lot !
TRAIN TO ZONE ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Zoning out" from Blackburrow in Everquest taught me a lot!
TRAIN TO ZONE!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31430796</id>
	<title>Television and...</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1268214840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I take it they didn't include a television with a portable video camera in their tests?</p><p>In fact, I'd expect they'd lose more weight having a TV and video camera than they would having a computer with a webcam. A video camera would encourage more recording outdoors; a webcam would only encourage sex-skyping.</p><p>If it's a computer with a portable video camera, they're more likely to do editing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I take it they did n't include a television with a portable video camera in their tests ? In fact , I 'd expect they 'd lose more weight having a TV and video camera than they would having a computer with a webcam .
A video camera would encourage more recording outdoors ; a webcam would only encourage sex-skyping.If it 's a computer with a portable video camera , they 're more likely to do editing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I take it they didn't include a television with a portable video camera in their tests?In fact, I'd expect they'd lose more weight having a TV and video camera than they would having a computer with a webcam.
A video camera would encourage more recording outdoors; a webcam would only encourage sex-skyping.If it's a computer with a portable video camera, they're more likely to do editing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427532</id>
	<title>Re:What about food commercials?</title>
	<author>kuzb</author>
	<datestamp>1268242680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is still that person making a conscious effort to go out, and stuff food in their mouth.

Fat kids are a direct result of porking down and being lazy.  Attempting to use a television as a scapegoat is just attempting to shift blame.  All these people need to do to change things is fix their diet and exercise 30 minutes a day.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is still that person making a conscious effort to go out , and stuff food in their mouth .
Fat kids are a direct result of porking down and being lazy .
Attempting to use a television as a scapegoat is just attempting to shift blame .
All these people need to do to change things is fix their diet and exercise 30 minutes a day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is still that person making a conscious effort to go out, and stuff food in their mouth.
Fat kids are a direct result of porking down and being lazy.
Attempting to use a television as a scapegoat is just attempting to shift blame.
All these people need to do to change things is fix their diet and exercise 30 minutes a day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31430944</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>cheese1756</author>
	<datestamp>1268215560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess because TV's involve only output, while computers involve input and output. Basically, you need to think when you are using a computer, while when you are watching TV you don't. Now, where do video games fall?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess because TV 's involve only output , while computers involve input and output .
Basically , you need to think when you are using a computer , while when you are watching TV you do n't .
Now , where do video games fall ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess because TV's involve only output, while computers involve input and output.
Basically, you need to think when you are using a computer, while when you are watching TV you don't.
Now, where do video games fall?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426648</id>
	<title>Source</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268238780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That article has got to be the worse source ever. Around about 500 words, referencing 'a study' as it's only sorce. No link to the abstract of the study, or any mention of the journal it was published in, or the authors. And yet it makes the front page of slashdot?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That article has got to be the worse source ever .
Around about 500 words , referencing 'a study ' as it 's only sorce .
No link to the abstract of the study , or any mention of the journal it was published in , or the authors .
And yet it makes the front page of slashdot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That article has got to be the worse source ever.
Around about 500 words, referencing 'a study' as it's only sorce.
No link to the abstract of the study, or any mention of the journal it was published in, or the authors.
And yet it makes the front page of slashdot?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31459308</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268400240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you are right here, I remember hearing somewhere that watching TV actually burns less calories than staring at a wall (or something like that), I think the only less energy intensive thing you can do is sleep.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you are right here , I remember hearing somewhere that watching TV actually burns less calories than staring at a wall ( or something like that ) , I think the only less energy intensive thing you can do is sleep .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you are right here, I remember hearing somewhere that watching TV actually burns less calories than staring at a wall (or something like that), I think the only less energy intensive thing you can do is sleep.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428836</id>
	<title>Re:I knew it</title>
	<author>digitalaudiorock</author>
	<datestamp>1268248980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Computers are awesome.</p></div><p>&lt;voice class="homer"&gt;Is there <i>anything</i> they can't fix?&lt;/voice&gt;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Computers are awesome.Is there anything they ca n't fix ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Computers are awesome.Is there anything they can't fix?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428508</id>
	<title>Other correlations?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268247360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It would also be interesting to see if there are any relationships between hours spent watching TV, hours spent using a computer, intelligence, and school performance. Kids can be messy with snacks and drinks, especially when preoccupied by watching TV or using a computer. Hardwood or laminate flooring can be an easy solution to kid-proof a home.
<a href="http://www.truehardwoods.com/" title="truehardwoods.com" rel="nofollow">True Hardwoods</a> [truehardwoods.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would also be interesting to see if there are any relationships between hours spent watching TV , hours spent using a computer , intelligence , and school performance .
Kids can be messy with snacks and drinks , especially when preoccupied by watching TV or using a computer .
Hardwood or laminate flooring can be an easy solution to kid-proof a home .
True Hardwoods [ truehardwoods.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would also be interesting to see if there are any relationships between hours spent watching TV, hours spent using a computer, intelligence, and school performance.
Kids can be messy with snacks and drinks, especially when preoccupied by watching TV or using a computer.
Hardwood or laminate flooring can be an easy solution to kid-proof a home.
True Hardwoods [truehardwoods.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428668</id>
	<title>Re:Apostrophe's</title>
	<author>precariousgray</author>
	<datestamp>1268248200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Abuse of apostrophe's make baby Je'su's cry.</p></div><p>Hello, my name is Stan Kuciniwitz, I am the department chair of English here at Stephen C. Faulk Community College in South Madison, Wyoming.  I have held a Ph.D for some thirty years in English.  I wished to take a moment to educate on the use of the apostrophe.  In English, the apostrophe must always precede the letter S.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Abu'se of apo'strophe's make baby Je'su's cry.</p></div><p>Accordingly, I have fixed that for you.
<br> <br>
Regards,
<br>James</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Abuse of apostrophe 's make baby Je'su 's cry.Hello , my name is Stan Kuciniwitz , I am the department chair of English here at Stephen C. Faulk Community College in South Madison , Wyoming .
I have held a Ph.D for some thirty years in English .
I wished to take a moment to educate on the use of the apostrophe .
In English , the apostrophe must always precede the letter S.Abu'se of apo'strophe 's make baby Je'su 's cry.Accordingly , I have fixed that for you .
Regards , James</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Abuse of apostrophe's make baby Je'su's cry.Hello, my name is Stan Kuciniwitz, I am the department chair of English here at Stephen C. Faulk Community College in South Madison, Wyoming.
I have held a Ph.D for some thirty years in English.
I wished to take a moment to educate on the use of the apostrophe.
In English, the apostrophe must always precede the letter S.Abu'se of apo'strophe's make baby Je'su's cry.Accordingly, I have fixed that for you.
Regards,
James
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427300</id>
	<title>Re:IS there a link to the study?</title>
	<author>Vyse of Arcadia</author>
	<datestamp>1268241540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why the child was inactive turns out to be a number of other reasons. depression, stress, bad house hold habits. and so on.</p></div><p>Or, you know, the child is just naturally more laid-back than his or her peers. It's not always something bad.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why the child was inactive turns out to be a number of other reasons .
depression , stress , bad house hold habits .
and so on.Or , you know , the child is just naturally more laid-back than his or her peers .
It 's not always something bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why the child was inactive turns out to be a number of other reasons.
depression, stress, bad house hold habits.
and so on.Or, you know, the child is just naturally more laid-back than his or her peers.
It's not always something bad.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425984</id>
	<title>Apostrophe's</title>
	<author>operagost</author>
	<datestamp>1268235960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Abuse of apostrophe's make baby Je'su's cry.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Abuse of apostrophe 's make baby Je'su 's cry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Abuse of apostrophe's make baby Je'su's cry.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427076</id>
	<title>Oat bran, the silent killer</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1268240640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Article on TV making kids fat. Check. See you in six months.</p><p>OK, what's next... cell phone cancer? No, too soon. Video game violence? Not quite yet.</p><p>How about one where creationism believing fat kids using cell phones under power lines can get cancer unless they use Linux and stop global warming using stimulus money for stem cell research?</p><p>Ooo! How about a good "Amerkinz am teh stoopids" study based on a phone survey?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Article on TV making kids fat .
Check. See you in six months.OK , what 's next... cell phone cancer ?
No , too soon .
Video game violence ?
Not quite yet.How about one where creationism believing fat kids using cell phones under power lines can get cancer unless they use Linux and stop global warming using stimulus money for stem cell research ? Ooo !
How about a good " Amerkinz am teh stoopids " study based on a phone survey ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Article on TV making kids fat.
Check. See you in six months.OK, what's next... cell phone cancer?
No, too soon.
Video game violence?
Not quite yet.How about one where creationism believing fat kids using cell phones under power lines can get cancer unless they use Linux and stop global warming using stimulus money for stem cell research?Ooo!
How about a good "Amerkinz am teh stoopids" study based on a phone survey?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31431896</id>
	<title>Re:I knew it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268219880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Amen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Amen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Amen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426882</id>
	<title>who can eat when</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268239860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are busy fragging with both hands ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are busy fragging with both hands ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are busy fragging with both hands ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426216</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1268236920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, and a bit of self promotion (which I love to do, lol)...over the course of a month, I wrote a series of articles about being healthy while gaming...two of them deal with nutrition, one with exercise, and the other is comfort.  You might find them interesting:</p><p><a href="http://livingwithanerd.com/tag/healthy-gamer-series/" title="livingwithanerd.com">http://livingwithanerd.com/tag/healthy-gamer-series/</a> [livingwithanerd.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , and a bit of self promotion ( which I love to do , lol ) ...over the course of a month , I wrote a series of articles about being healthy while gaming...two of them deal with nutrition , one with exercise , and the other is comfort .
You might find them interesting : http : //livingwithanerd.com/tag/healthy-gamer-series/ [ livingwithanerd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, and a bit of self promotion (which I love to do, lol)...over the course of a month, I wrote a series of articles about being healthy while gaming...two of them deal with nutrition, one with exercise, and the other is comfort.
You might find them interesting:http://livingwithanerd.com/tag/healthy-gamer-series/ [livingwithanerd.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429228</id>
	<title>In related news;</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268250660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Harvard researchers release exhaustive caloric &lsquo;burn&rsquo; chart relative to key strokes and mouse clicks.<br>Further studies also indicate all Eating Disorders may be related to Food.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Harvard researchers release exhaustive caloric    burn    chart relative to key strokes and mouse clicks.Further studies also indicate all Eating Disorders may be related to Food .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Harvard researchers release exhaustive caloric ‘burn’ chart relative to key strokes and mouse clicks.Further studies also indicate all Eating Disorders may be related to Food.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31430214</id>
	<title>Question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268212020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if I'm watching TV on my computer?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if I 'm watching TV on my computer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if I'm watching TV on my computer?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31448968</id>
	<title>Re:I knew it</title>
	<author>LuNa7ic</author>
	<datestamp>1268334900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When will they learn, correlation does not imply... wait, this article favours computers?

IT MUST BE TRUE!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>When will they learn , correlation does not imply... wait , this article favours computers ?
IT MUST BE TRUE !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When will they learn, correlation does not imply... wait, this article favours computers?
IT MUST BE TRUE!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427788</id>
	<title>Re:I knew it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268243760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Computers are awesome.</p></div><p>Thank you Microsft!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Computers are awesome.Thank you Microsft !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Computers are awesome.Thank you Microsft!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426206</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>Cazakatari</author>
	<datestamp>1268236860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think food has anything to do with it, more of how ''active'' someone is.  Even just websurfing you have to be thinking about something and making cognitive decisions.  The brain is a energy intensive organ, and studies have shown that ''thinking'' increases energy needs.  Like you said, watching TV turns you into a vegetable.</p><p>What I would like to see is a comparison of watching TV and using something like youtube or hulu.  One would hypothesize that they would begin to show similar results.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think food has anything to do with it , more of how ''active' ' someone is .
Even just websurfing you have to be thinking about something and making cognitive decisions .
The brain is a energy intensive organ , and studies have shown that ''thinking' ' increases energy needs .
Like you said , watching TV turns you into a vegetable.What I would like to see is a comparison of watching TV and using something like youtube or hulu .
One would hypothesize that they would begin to show similar results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think food has anything to do with it, more of how ''active'' someone is.
Even just websurfing you have to be thinking about something and making cognitive decisions.
The brain is a energy intensive organ, and studies have shown that ''thinking'' increases energy needs.
Like you said, watching TV turns you into a vegetable.What I would like to see is a comparison of watching TV and using something like youtube or hulu.
One would hypothesize that they would begin to show similar results.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426566</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>gad\_zuki!</author>
	<datestamp>1268238420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;Yes yes, I know, a generalization...but in my experience, it's the truth.</p><p>Err, its still a generalization with nothing to back it up.  I'm not one typically to defend TV, but I can imagine a credible opposite to your argument.</p><p>When I watch TV, I'm either watching comedies or watching something that is teaching me something. With comedies, I'm often laughing or commenting on the show to the person next to me. During the other shows I would feel intellectually stimulated, pause it, maybe do a related web search, etc.  TV is very social. I can watch it with others.</p><p>When I use a computer, I tend to read discussion sites or play games. Both involve snacking. When I was foolish enough to play MUDs and MMOs this involved meals at the PC, and lots of dumb grinding. Other games involve dumb puzzle solving.  This is usually a solo activity. Im slumped in a chair and clicking a mouse.</p><p>Anyway, my point is all of this depends on the way you use television or the computer and your dietary habits. Not to mention cause vs correlation.  Ive read other studies about the light from the TV causing insomnia.  Insomnia is also linked to obesity, mood disturbances, and mental illness.  Perhaps the smaller screen from a laptop or PC minimizes this effect. Who knows. Without some real proof we're just projecting our biases.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Yes yes , I know , a generalization...but in my experience , it 's the truth.Err , its still a generalization with nothing to back it up .
I 'm not one typically to defend TV , but I can imagine a credible opposite to your argument.When I watch TV , I 'm either watching comedies or watching something that is teaching me something .
With comedies , I 'm often laughing or commenting on the show to the person next to me .
During the other shows I would feel intellectually stimulated , pause it , maybe do a related web search , etc .
TV is very social .
I can watch it with others.When I use a computer , I tend to read discussion sites or play games .
Both involve snacking .
When I was foolish enough to play MUDs and MMOs this involved meals at the PC , and lots of dumb grinding .
Other games involve dumb puzzle solving .
This is usually a solo activity .
Im slumped in a chair and clicking a mouse.Anyway , my point is all of this depends on the way you use television or the computer and your dietary habits .
Not to mention cause vs correlation .
Ive read other studies about the light from the TV causing insomnia .
Insomnia is also linked to obesity , mood disturbances , and mental illness .
Perhaps the smaller screen from a laptop or PC minimizes this effect .
Who knows .
Without some real proof we 're just projecting our biases .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;Yes yes, I know, a generalization...but in my experience, it's the truth.Err, its still a generalization with nothing to back it up.
I'm not one typically to defend TV, but I can imagine a credible opposite to your argument.When I watch TV, I'm either watching comedies or watching something that is teaching me something.
With comedies, I'm often laughing or commenting on the show to the person next to me.
During the other shows I would feel intellectually stimulated, pause it, maybe do a related web search, etc.
TV is very social.
I can watch it with others.When I use a computer, I tend to read discussion sites or play games.
Both involve snacking.
When I was foolish enough to play MUDs and MMOs this involved meals at the PC, and lots of dumb grinding.
Other games involve dumb puzzle solving.
This is usually a solo activity.
Im slumped in a chair and clicking a mouse.Anyway, my point is all of this depends on the way you use television or the computer and your dietary habits.
Not to mention cause vs correlation.
Ive read other studies about the light from the TV causing insomnia.
Insomnia is also linked to obesity, mood disturbances, and mental illness.
Perhaps the smaller screen from a laptop or PC minimizes this effect.
Who knows.
Without some real proof we're just projecting our biases.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426988</id>
	<title>Re:Source</title>
	<author>AndrewNeo</author>
	<datestamp>1268240280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since when did <i>anything</i> require credibility to get on the front page of Slashdot?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since when did anything require credibility to get on the front page of Slashdot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since when did anything require credibility to get on the front page of Slashdot?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428672</id>
	<title>Re:I knew it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268248200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Computers are awesome.</p></div><p>*And* they make you use your brain (a bit, or a lot, depending on what you do), the most voracious organ of the whole body.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Computers are awesome .
* And * they make you use your brain ( a bit , or a lot , depending on what you do ) , the most voracious organ of the whole body .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Computers are awesome.
*And* they make you use your brain (a bit, or a lot, depending on what you do), the most voracious organ of the whole body.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426368</id>
	<title>Correction: *boring* TV makes people fat</title>
	<author>petes\_PoV</author>
	<datestamp>1268237640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most TV programmes just aren't that engaging. As a consequence people find other, more interesting, things to do while the TV provides a background. The same cannot be said of video games, which generally don't leave any hands free for stuffing garbage down your neck (and would result in "death" or points-loss for losing concentration if you took time off to try it).
<p>
What would be interesting is whether it's the programmes or the advertisements that make people (and I doubt that it's limited to just children) fill up on garbage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most TV programmes just are n't that engaging .
As a consequence people find other , more interesting , things to do while the TV provides a background .
The same can not be said of video games , which generally do n't leave any hands free for stuffing garbage down your neck ( and would result in " death " or points-loss for losing concentration if you took time off to try it ) .
What would be interesting is whether it 's the programmes or the advertisements that make people ( and I doubt that it 's limited to just children ) fill up on garbage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most TV programmes just aren't that engaging.
As a consequence people find other, more interesting, things to do while the TV provides a background.
The same cannot be said of video games, which generally don't leave any hands free for stuffing garbage down your neck (and would result in "death" or points-loss for losing concentration if you took time off to try it).
What would be interesting is whether it's the programmes or the advertisements that make people (and I doubt that it's limited to just children) fill up on garbage.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426532</id>
	<title>The computer's what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268238240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apostrophe's aren't for plural's.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apostrophe 's are n't for plural 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apostrophe's aren't for plural's.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426120</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>ndavis</author>
	<datestamp>1268236560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think this is primarily due to the snack foods.  For a while I stopped playing games at night and started watching TV during that time and I gained about 10 lbs and was not sure why.  So I started to track what I was eating and I noticed that while I watched TV I would eat ice cream or something that required two hands.<br> <br>

Then I purchased some games for my PS3 and started playing those at night instead (as I realized nothing on TV interested me) and noticed that while I might eat while I play it was typically a lot less and I typically grabbed some almonds or something that is at least not as bad.

<br> <br>While this is just my experience I think TV makes it easier to eat.  I also notice this when football season starts as I tend to watch a lot of games and eat and drink while at the same time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this is primarily due to the snack foods .
For a while I stopped playing games at night and started watching TV during that time and I gained about 10 lbs and was not sure why .
So I started to track what I was eating and I noticed that while I watched TV I would eat ice cream or something that required two hands .
Then I purchased some games for my PS3 and started playing those at night instead ( as I realized nothing on TV interested me ) and noticed that while I might eat while I play it was typically a lot less and I typically grabbed some almonds or something that is at least not as bad .
While this is just my experience I think TV makes it easier to eat .
I also notice this when football season starts as I tend to watch a lot of games and eat and drink while at the same time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this is primarily due to the snack foods.
For a while I stopped playing games at night and started watching TV during that time and I gained about 10 lbs and was not sure why.
So I started to track what I was eating and I noticed that while I watched TV I would eat ice cream or something that required two hands.
Then I purchased some games for my PS3 and started playing those at night instead (as I realized nothing on TV interested me) and noticed that while I might eat while I play it was typically a lot less and I typically grabbed some almonds or something that is at least not as bad.
While this is just my experience I think TV makes it easier to eat.
I also notice this when football season starts as I tend to watch a lot of games and eat and drink while at the same time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426962</id>
	<title>Maybe theres a link between the hands...</title>
	<author>g0bshiTe</author>
	<datestamp>1268240100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>On a computer the hands are kept busy, typing mashing buttons whatever, watching TV hands are idle, perhaps flipping channels on a remote. Seems there may be a direct link between keeping ones hands occupied by typing/button mashing vs. idle where it's easier to stuff ones face due to having nothing to do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>On a computer the hands are kept busy , typing mashing buttons whatever , watching TV hands are idle , perhaps flipping channels on a remote .
Seems there may be a direct link between keeping ones hands occupied by typing/button mashing vs. idle where it 's easier to stuff ones face due to having nothing to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On a computer the hands are kept busy, typing mashing buttons whatever, watching TV hands are idle, perhaps flipping channels on a remote.
Seems there may be a direct link between keeping ones hands occupied by typing/button mashing vs. idle where it's easier to stuff ones face due to having nothing to do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982</id>
	<title>Interesting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268235900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article is likely correct about the snacks and food.  Also, no offense intended to anyone, but I've noticed that people who just zone out to television as compared to active computer users/gamers tend to be a bit...dumber.</p><p>Yes yes, I know, a generalization...but in my experience, it's the truth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article is likely correct about the snacks and food .
Also , no offense intended to anyone , but I 've noticed that people who just zone out to television as compared to active computer users/gamers tend to be a bit...dumber.Yes yes , I know , a generalization...but in my experience , it 's the truth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article is likely correct about the snacks and food.
Also, no offense intended to anyone, but I've noticed that people who just zone out to television as compared to active computer users/gamers tend to be a bit...dumber.Yes yes, I know, a generalization...but in my experience, it's the truth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426634</id>
	<title>jobs was right</title>
	<author>johnrpenner</author>
	<datestamp>1268238720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You watch television to turn your brain off<br>and you work on your computer<br>when you want to turn your brain on.<br>(Steve Jobs, Macworld, Feb 2004)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You watch television to turn your brain offand you work on your computerwhen you want to turn your brain on .
( Steve Jobs , Macworld , Feb 2004 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You watch television to turn your brain offand you work on your computerwhen you want to turn your brain on.
(Steve Jobs, Macworld, Feb 2004)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31430696</id>
	<title>How did they test?</title>
	<author>Shompol</author>
	<datestamp>1268214360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did they just correlate #of kids with TV vs. kids with PC? If so then surprise: correlation does not imply causation.<br>
Either that or they could go around installing TVs and PCs and removing whatever kids had in their rooms before test, which I don't think the parents would let them do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did they just correlate # of kids with TV vs. kids with PC ?
If so then surprise : correlation does not imply causation .
Either that or they could go around installing TVs and PCs and removing whatever kids had in their rooms before test , which I do n't think the parents would let them do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did they just correlate #of kids with TV vs. kids with PC?
If so then surprise: correlation does not imply causation.
Either that or they could go around installing TVs and PCs and removing whatever kids had in their rooms before test, which I don't think the parents would let them do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426170</id>
	<title>Perhaps kids...</title>
	<author>GerardAtJob</author>
	<datestamp>1268236740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... but in my case, beer makes me fatter and fatter...<br>I can't play any games without my beer!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p><p>So all thoses kids won't become fat until they turn 18 / 21...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... but in my case , beer makes me fatter and fatter...I ca n't play any games without my beer !
: ( So all thoses kids wo n't become fat until they turn 18 / 21.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... but in my case, beer makes me fatter and fatter...I can't play any games without my beer!
:(So all thoses kids won't become fat until they turn 18 / 21...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427238</id>
	<title>Makes sense to me</title>
	<author>Vyse of Arcadia</author>
	<datestamp>1268241300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hell, I almost starved to death when I got Diablo II.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hell , I almost starved to death when I got Diablo II .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hell, I almost starved to death when I got Diablo II.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31432648</id>
	<title>to be fair...</title>
	<author>AlgorithMan</author>
	<datestamp>1268224620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>to be fair: correlation is not causation.<br>
when we say that for every correlation we don't like, we have to say it for correlations we like...</htmltext>
<tokenext>to be fair : correlation is not causation .
when we say that for every correlation we do n't like , we have to say it for correlations we like.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to be fair: correlation is not causation.
when we say that for every correlation we don't like, we have to say it for correlations we like...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429860</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268253660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now I want a sacred hamburger for lunch...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now I want a sacred hamburger for lunch.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now I want a sacred hamburger for lunch...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426330</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427214</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268241240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>either that, or claim you're an "Addict" (they like to throw that word around)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>either that , or claim you 're an " Addict " ( they like to throw that word around )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>either that, or claim you're an "Addict" (they like to throw that word around)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429906</id>
	<title>Re:IS there a link to the study?</title>
	<author>lmcgeoch</author>
	<datestamp>1268253780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The study might be side effect of parenting decisions.  The parents that let their kids sit in front of the TV for hours might also be the same kind of parents that let their kids eat a big bowl of ice cream right before dinner.  Or serve their kids less nutritious meals deciding on convenience rather than nutrition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The study might be side effect of parenting decisions .
The parents that let their kids sit in front of the TV for hours might also be the same kind of parents that let their kids eat a big bowl of ice cream right before dinner .
Or serve their kids less nutritious meals deciding on convenience rather than nutrition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The study might be side effect of parenting decisions.
The parents that let their kids sit in front of the TV for hours might also be the same kind of parents that let their kids eat a big bowl of ice cream right before dinner.
Or serve their kids less nutritious meals deciding on convenience rather than nutrition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426330</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1268237400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sadly, nothing backs you up. You might want to think about your personal bias.</p><p>It also helps to learn to slaughter sacred cows.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly , nothing backs you up .
You might want to think about your personal bias.It also helps to learn to slaughter sacred cows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly, nothing backs you up.
You might want to think about your personal bias.It also helps to learn to slaughter sacred cows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31462756</id>
	<title>Re:We already knew that geeks are skinny...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268477280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The real news is that this is not because of lack of exercise</p></div><p>So that's where my weight loss plan is going wrong, I'm exercising too much.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The real news is that this is not because of lack of exerciseSo that 's where my weight loss plan is going wrong , I 'm exercising too much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real news is that this is not because of lack of exerciseSo that's where my weight loss plan is going wrong, I'm exercising too much.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427542</id>
	<title>Re:IS there a link to the study?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268242740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly. There is a difference between causation and correlation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
There is a difference between causation and correlation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
There is a difference between causation and correlation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428980</id>
	<title>Re:What about food commercials?</title>
	<author>sorak</author>
	<datestamp>1268249580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How many ads for fast food, soft drinks, candy bar, restaurants, etc. do you see during an hour of watching TV versus during an hour of using the computer?</p><p>Food cues might play a strong role, too.</p></div><p>It would be interesting to see how much difference the power of suggestion makes, but, if true, wouldn't this also have strong ramifications for the video game violence controversy?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How many ads for fast food , soft drinks , candy bar , restaurants , etc .
do you see during an hour of watching TV versus during an hour of using the computer ? Food cues might play a strong role , too.It would be interesting to see how much difference the power of suggestion makes , but , if true , would n't this also have strong ramifications for the video game violence controversy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many ads for fast food, soft drinks, candy bar, restaurants, etc.
do you see during an hour of watching TV versus during an hour of using the computer?Food cues might play a strong role, too.It would be interesting to see how much difference the power of suggestion makes, but, if true, wouldn't this also have strong ramifications for the video game violence controversy?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427718</id>
	<title>In proper english</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268243520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The story is also carried by The Local in proper non-googlished english: http://www.thelocal.se/25456/20100310/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The story is also carried by The Local in proper non-googlished english : http : //www.thelocal.se/25456/20100310/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The story is also carried by The Local in proper non-googlished english: http://www.thelocal.se/25456/20100310/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429688</id>
	<title>Re:What about food commercials?</title>
	<author>thestuckmud</author>
	<datestamp>1268252940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://ajph.aphapublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/100/2/334" title="aphapublications.org">Research</a> [aphapublications.org] supports parent, suggesting ads, rather than the TV programs, are responsible for obesity.<br> <br>

My own theory is the effectiveness of those ads can be greatly reduced by parents who watch TV with their children and discuss how the ads are trying to manipulate them.  Even little kids will understand that Mt. Dew won't make you a better skateboarder when you explain it to them.  They'll still ask for soft drinks at every opportunity.  When my 7yo son asks for junk food, I sometimes reply with the question: "what would a good father say?".  He always chooses the healthy option when I do this.  Sometimes I say yes, because the forbidden fruit is always the sweetest.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Research [ aphapublications.org ] supports parent , suggesting ads , rather than the TV programs , are responsible for obesity .
My own theory is the effectiveness of those ads can be greatly reduced by parents who watch TV with their children and discuss how the ads are trying to manipulate them .
Even little kids will understand that Mt .
Dew wo n't make you a better skateboarder when you explain it to them .
They 'll still ask for soft drinks at every opportunity .
When my 7yo son asks for junk food , I sometimes reply with the question : " what would a good father say ? " .
He always chooses the healthy option when I do this .
Sometimes I say yes , because the forbidden fruit is always the sweetest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Research [aphapublications.org] supports parent, suggesting ads, rather than the TV programs, are responsible for obesity.
My own theory is the effectiveness of those ads can be greatly reduced by parents who watch TV with their children and discuss how the ads are trying to manipulate them.
Even little kids will understand that Mt.
Dew won't make you a better skateboarder when you explain it to them.
They'll still ask for soft drinks at every opportunity.
When my 7yo son asks for junk food, I sometimes reply with the question: "what would a good father say?".
He always chooses the healthy option when I do this.
Sometimes I say yes, because the forbidden fruit is always the sweetest.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429566</id>
	<title>Re:Apostrophe's (PS)</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1268252400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Computer's" don't make children fat, but they do make them illiterate (as proven by the summary).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Computer 's " do n't make children fat , but they do make them illiterate ( as proven by the summary ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Computer's" don't make children fat, but they do make them illiterate (as proven by the summary).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31436394</id>
	<title>Burning calories big time!</title>
	<author>howzit</author>
	<datestamp>1268314200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Remember how hungry you were after writing a two hour exam at school? The working brain is an energy drain. It's a fat burner. Watching a movie pulls the brain with it, you use as much energy as you would sitting on a park bench watching traffic. Power to the Puter!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember how hungry you were after writing a two hour exam at school ?
The working brain is an energy drain .
It 's a fat burner .
Watching a movie pulls the brain with it , you use as much energy as you would sitting on a park bench watching traffic .
Power to the Puter !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember how hungry you were after writing a two hour exam at school?
The working brain is an energy drain.
It's a fat burner.
Watching a movie pulls the brain with it, you use as much energy as you would sitting on a park bench watching traffic.
Power to the Puter!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31430470</id>
	<title>Books too</title>
	<author>Chess Piece Face</author>
	<datestamp>1268213220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With about the same involvement level as television, reading also lends itself to mindless snacking.  With fewer Pizza Hut commercials.</p><p>Not really sure what the point of this study is - should we take away our kids' TVs and replace them with the internet and video games?  Obesity is a problem but then again so is attention span.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With about the same involvement level as television , reading also lends itself to mindless snacking .
With fewer Pizza Hut commercials.Not really sure what the point of this study is - should we take away our kids ' TVs and replace them with the internet and video games ?
Obesity is a problem but then again so is attention span .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With about the same involvement level as television, reading also lends itself to mindless snacking.
With fewer Pizza Hut commercials.Not really sure what the point of this study is - should we take away our kids' TVs and replace them with the internet and video games?
Obesity is a problem but then again so is attention span.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426230</id>
	<title>So.... Watch TV while you use the computer?</title>
	<author>Rivalz</author>
	<datestamp>1268236980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you have no where to sit while you watch tv its pretty hard to eat.
If you use the computer while you watch tv it is pretty hard to eat.
And if you goto the gym and run on a treadmill while you watch tv...

I hope whoever commissioned this study paid with our tax money.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you have no where to sit while you watch tv its pretty hard to eat .
If you use the computer while you watch tv it is pretty hard to eat .
And if you goto the gym and run on a treadmill while you watch tv.. . I hope whoever commissioned this study paid with our tax money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you have no where to sit while you watch tv its pretty hard to eat.
If you use the computer while you watch tv it is pretty hard to eat.
And if you goto the gym and run on a treadmill while you watch tv...

I hope whoever commissioned this study paid with our tax money.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428880</id>
	<title>Video games</title>
	<author>Scratch-O-Matic</author>
	<datestamp>1268249160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interesting.  I recently realized that I have come to consider video games (Wii) a healthy alternative to tv for my two boys (5 and 7.)  Last Saturday I told them to turn the tv off and find something to do, and the 5 year old asked if he could play Wii.  I said sure.  And it's not because of the physical activity with Wii either...it's more the matter of participating in what's on the screen.  There's probably a generational shift in progress.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting .
I recently realized that I have come to consider video games ( Wii ) a healthy alternative to tv for my two boys ( 5 and 7 .
) Last Saturday I told them to turn the tv off and find something to do , and the 5 year old asked if he could play Wii .
I said sure .
And it 's not because of the physical activity with Wii either...it 's more the matter of participating in what 's on the screen .
There 's probably a generational shift in progress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting.
I recently realized that I have come to consider video games (Wii) a healthy alternative to tv for my two boys (5 and 7.
)  Last Saturday I told them to turn the tv off and find something to do, and the 5 year old asked if he could play Wii.
I said sure.
And it's not because of the physical activity with Wii either...it's more the matter of participating in what's on the screen.
There's probably a generational shift in progress.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426280</id>
	<title>IS there a link to the study?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1268237280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Previous studies showed that the TV made no difference at all. Kids who weren't active in the house, where no more active when they went outside.</p><p>The studies I have read based on TV obesity all showed that TV was not the cause, but just something people who were inactive happened to do.<br>Why the child was inactive turns out to be a number of other reasons. depression, stress, bad house hold habits. and so on.</p><p>What TV does seem to do is make people think they need to eat, vie food commercials.</p><p>Sadly, there are surprisingly few good* studies that try to tease apart the variables in TV watching. I would like to read the detail in this study.<br>How  were the children selected? What where there daily activities before the study? Was the study done at a time of year that coincide with better weather? How where controls done? was diet monitored?</p><p>The reason given seems a little thin, since eating at the computer is as easy as the TV. OF course, there could be a cultural reason for not eating while on the computer.</p><p>Quite frankly, I would be for the removing of food commercials. It would never happen, but I would wager that after a year the obesity problem would start to slow down, if not stop.</p><p>*lots of bad studies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Previous studies showed that the TV made no difference at all .
Kids who were n't active in the house , where no more active when they went outside.The studies I have read based on TV obesity all showed that TV was not the cause , but just something people who were inactive happened to do.Why the child was inactive turns out to be a number of other reasons .
depression , stress , bad house hold habits .
and so on.What TV does seem to do is make people think they need to eat , vie food commercials.Sadly , there are surprisingly few good * studies that try to tease apart the variables in TV watching .
I would like to read the detail in this study.How were the children selected ?
What where there daily activities before the study ?
Was the study done at a time of year that coincide with better weather ?
How where controls done ?
was diet monitored ? The reason given seems a little thin , since eating at the computer is as easy as the TV .
OF course , there could be a cultural reason for not eating while on the computer.Quite frankly , I would be for the removing of food commercials .
It would never happen , but I would wager that after a year the obesity problem would start to slow down , if not stop .
* lots of bad studies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Previous studies showed that the TV made no difference at all.
Kids who weren't active in the house, where no more active when they went outside.The studies I have read based on TV obesity all showed that TV was not the cause, but just something people who were inactive happened to do.Why the child was inactive turns out to be a number of other reasons.
depression, stress, bad house hold habits.
and so on.What TV does seem to do is make people think they need to eat, vie food commercials.Sadly, there are surprisingly few good* studies that try to tease apart the variables in TV watching.
I would like to read the detail in this study.How  were the children selected?
What where there daily activities before the study?
Was the study done at a time of year that coincide with better weather?
How where controls done?
was diet monitored?The reason given seems a little thin, since eating at the computer is as easy as the TV.
OF course, there could be a cultural reason for not eating while on the computer.Quite frankly, I would be for the removing of food commercials.
It would never happen, but I would wager that after a year the obesity problem would start to slow down, if not stop.
*lots of bad studies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427130</id>
	<title>Correlation...</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1268240880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...is not causation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...is not causation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...is not causation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428758</id>
	<title>but</title>
	<author>Jarik C-Bol</author>
	<datestamp>1268248560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>but what about watching TV on the computer?</htmltext>
<tokenext>but what about watching TV on the computer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but what about watching TV on the computer?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426234</id>
	<title>What about food commercials?</title>
	<author>CyberSlugGump</author>
	<datestamp>1268236980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>How many ads for fast food, soft drinks, candy bar, restaurants, etc. do you see during an hour of watching TV versus during an hour of using the computer?

Food cues might play a strong role, too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How many ads for fast food , soft drinks , candy bar , restaurants , etc .
do you see during an hour of watching TV versus during an hour of using the computer ?
Food cues might play a strong role , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many ads for fast food, soft drinks, candy bar, restaurants, etc.
do you see during an hour of watching TV versus during an hour of using the computer?
Food cues might play a strong role, too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428010</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>Maxo-Texas</author>
	<datestamp>1268244840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On the internet you type, you move your arm to the mouse, you move the mouse, you shift in your chair, you type some more.  You also use core muscles to remain upright.</p><p>Watching TV, you pretty much lounge completely motionless most of the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the internet you type , you move your arm to the mouse , you move the mouse , you shift in your chair , you type some more .
You also use core muscles to remain upright.Watching TV , you pretty much lounge completely motionless most of the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the internet you type, you move your arm to the mouse, you move the mouse, you shift in your chair, you type some more.
You also use core muscles to remain upright.Watching TV, you pretty much lounge completely motionless most of the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427592</id>
	<title>My personal experiences</title>
	<author>Hadlock</author>
	<datestamp>1268242920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems most people who are serious about PC gaming are average weight to slender. I've seen this on mosaics of pictures people posted on gaming forums, also pictures of game mappers, and also at places like QuakeCon (where Quake 3 tends to be the core game featured every year) year after year. Of course these people tend to have some competitive spirit so that might have something to do with it. Even the people I know who play WoW, most are average weight. There is the occasional fatty here and there, but in my experience PC gamers tend to be slimmer than average.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems most people who are serious about PC gaming are average weight to slender .
I 've seen this on mosaics of pictures people posted on gaming forums , also pictures of game mappers , and also at places like QuakeCon ( where Quake 3 tends to be the core game featured every year ) year after year .
Of course these people tend to have some competitive spirit so that might have something to do with it .
Even the people I know who play WoW , most are average weight .
There is the occasional fatty here and there , but in my experience PC gamers tend to be slimmer than average .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems most people who are serious about PC gaming are average weight to slender.
I've seen this on mosaics of pictures people posted on gaming forums, also pictures of game mappers, and also at places like QuakeCon (where Quake 3 tends to be the core game featured every year) year after year.
Of course these people tend to have some competitive spirit so that might have something to do with it.
Even the people I know who play WoW, most are average weight.
There is the occasional fatty here and there, but in my experience PC gamers tend to be slimmer than average.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426202</id>
	<title>How about...</title>
	<author>Gi0</author>
	<datestamp>1268236800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...tv tuners on pcs? What happens then?
Who funds those studies,geeez!</htmltext>
<tokenext>...tv tuners on pcs ?
What happens then ?
Who funds those studies,geeez !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...tv tuners on pcs?
What happens then?
Who funds those studies,geeez!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31431378</id>
	<title>Re:What if it's the heart rate?</title>
	<author>plague3106</author>
	<datestamp>1268217600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your heart is just moving more blood around though.. your muscles still aren't doing anything, so the calories you're burning are irrelevent.  Oh, and I believe that kind of stress is actually bad for your heart...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your heart is just moving more blood around though.. your muscles still are n't doing anything , so the calories you 're burning are irrelevent .
Oh , and I believe that kind of stress is actually bad for your heart.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your heart is just moving more blood around though.. your muscles still aren't doing anything, so the calories you're burning are irrelevent.
Oh, and I believe that kind of stress is actually bad for your heart...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428254</id>
	<title>Paralyzed</title>
	<author>Boronx</author>
	<datestamp>1268246160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Watch people sitting in front of a TV.  They are unnaturally still, almost paralyzed by the constant shifting images.  Watch someone just sitting there, or using a computer.  They will almost always be moving a little bit, shifting position, fidgeting, attention jumping from one thing to another.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Watch people sitting in front of a TV .
They are unnaturally still , almost paralyzed by the constant shifting images .
Watch someone just sitting there , or using a computer .
They will almost always be moving a little bit , shifting position , fidgeting , attention jumping from one thing to another .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Watch people sitting in front of a TV.
They are unnaturally still, almost paralyzed by the constant shifting images.
Watch someone just sitting there, or using a computer.
They will almost always be moving a little bit, shifting position, fidgeting, attention jumping from one thing to another.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31431962</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>omris</author>
	<datestamp>1268220180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suspect that that may be some part of it, but I would guess that a larger part of it is ads.</p><p><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100209095753.htm" title="sciencedaily.com">http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100209095753.htm</a> [sciencedaily.com]</p><p>Apparently, there is also no correlation to weight gain and watching TV if you are watching DVDs or movies.  The correlation does not exist between TV and being fat, only TV with ads.  Similarly, playing on a computer has minimal ads, like watching a DVD, and shockingly, neither activity relates to obesity.</p><p>Also, typing one handed is useful for more than just fapping...  Also good for holding your booze, a smoke, and a shovel for food.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect that that may be some part of it , but I would guess that a larger part of it is ads.http : //www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100209095753.htm [ sciencedaily.com ] Apparently , there is also no correlation to weight gain and watching TV if you are watching DVDs or movies .
The correlation does not exist between TV and being fat , only TV with ads .
Similarly , playing on a computer has minimal ads , like watching a DVD , and shockingly , neither activity relates to obesity.Also , typing one handed is useful for more than just fapping... Also good for holding your booze , a smoke , and a shovel for food .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect that that may be some part of it, but I would guess that a larger part of it is ads.http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100209095753.htm [sciencedaily.com]Apparently, there is also no correlation to weight gain and watching TV if you are watching DVDs or movies.
The correlation does not exist between TV and being fat, only TV with ads.
Similarly, playing on a computer has minimal ads, like watching a DVD, and shockingly, neither activity relates to obesity.Also, typing one handed is useful for more than just fapping...  Also good for holding your booze, a smoke, and a shovel for food.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428514</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>Dogbertius</author>
	<datestamp>1268247420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The article is likely correct about the snacks and food.  Also, no offense intended to anyone, but I've noticed that people who just zone out to television as compared to active computer users/gamers tend to be a bit...dumber.</p><p>Yes yes, I know, a generalization...but in my experience, it's the truth.</p></div><p>All generalizations are false!!!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article is likely correct about the snacks and food .
Also , no offense intended to anyone , but I 've noticed that people who just zone out to television as compared to active computer users/gamers tend to be a bit...dumber.Yes yes , I know , a generalization...but in my experience , it 's the truth.All generalizations are false ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article is likely correct about the snacks and food.
Also, no offense intended to anyone, but I've noticed that people who just zone out to television as compared to active computer users/gamers tend to be a bit...dumber.Yes yes, I know, a generalization...but in my experience, it's the truth.All generalizations are false!!
!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426332</id>
	<title>Might have phrased that differently</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1268237400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>directly affected by placing a TV in the child's room</i></p><p>Immediate mental image: the child's weight changing instantly as the TV comes and goes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>directly affected by placing a TV in the child 's roomImmediate mental image : the child 's weight changing instantly as the TV comes and goes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>directly affected by placing a TV in the child's roomImmediate mental image: the child's weight changing instantly as the TV comes and goes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429706</id>
	<title>Computer is?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268253000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Computer is don't make children fat?  Or computers don't make children fat.  LOSE THE APOSTROPHE!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Computer is do n't make children fat ?
Or computers do n't make children fat .
LOSE THE APOSTROPHE !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Computer is don't make children fat?
Or computers don't make children fat.
LOSE THE APOSTROPHE!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426548
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31430944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31459308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427346
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428672
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31431896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31462756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31431378
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428836
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427360
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31448968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31433096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427532
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31430006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_144217_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31431962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_144217.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425984
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429566
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429034
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_144217.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426332
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_144217.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426280
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428772
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427360
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_144217.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31462756
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_144217.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426648
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426988
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_144217.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428508
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_144217.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426452
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_144217.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426962
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_144217.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427532
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_144217.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425978
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_144217.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427130
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_144217.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426476
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_144217.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31430006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31448968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31431896
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_144217.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426882
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_144217.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426488
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_144217.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31425982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31430944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426120
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31431962
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427126
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31431378
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426380
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427442
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426206
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428010
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31459308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31428514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31427346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426566
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31433096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429540
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426330
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31429860
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_144217.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_144217.31426368
</commentlist>
</conversation>
