<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_10_0020201</id>
	<title>The World's First Commercially Available Jetpack</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1268224380000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>ElectricSteve writes <i>"It's been a long time coming. While Arthur C. Clarke's geosync satellites have taken to space, and James Bond's futuristic mobile technology has become commonplace, still the dream of sustained personal flight has eluded us &mdash; until now. At $86,000, the <a href="http://www.gizmag.com/first-commercially-available-jetpack/14423/">Martin Aircraft jetpack</a> costs about as much as a high-end car, achieves a 30-minute flight time, and is fueled by regular gasoline. A 10\% deposit buys you a production slot for 12 months hence."</i> Here's a <a href="http://www.thebigmoney.com/blogs/shifting-gears/2010/03/05/learn-fly-jetpack-yes-jetpack">video of some indoor test flights</a>. This isn't Buck Rogers's jetpack &mdash; it's about 5 by 5 feet and weighs more than the average human. You won't be able to commute with it (the FAA has not certified this class of device) so it's recreational only for now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>ElectricSteve writes " It 's been a long time coming .
While Arthur C. Clarke 's geosync satellites have taken to space , and James Bond 's futuristic mobile technology has become commonplace , still the dream of sustained personal flight has eluded us    until now .
At $ 86,000 , the Martin Aircraft jetpack costs about as much as a high-end car , achieves a 30-minute flight time , and is fueled by regular gasoline .
A 10 \ % deposit buys you a production slot for 12 months hence .
" Here 's a video of some indoor test flights .
This is n't Buck Rogers 's jetpack    it 's about 5 by 5 feet and weighs more than the average human .
You wo n't be able to commute with it ( the FAA has not certified this class of device ) so it 's recreational only for now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ElectricSteve writes "It's been a long time coming.
While Arthur C. Clarke's geosync satellites have taken to space, and James Bond's futuristic mobile technology has become commonplace, still the dream of sustained personal flight has eluded us — until now.
At $86,000, the Martin Aircraft jetpack costs about as much as a high-end car, achieves a 30-minute flight time, and is fueled by regular gasoline.
A 10\% deposit buys you a production slot for 12 months hence.
" Here's a video of some indoor test flights.
This isn't Buck Rogers's jetpack — it's about 5 by 5 feet and weighs more than the average human.
You won't be able to commute with it (the FAA has not certified this class of device) so it's recreational only for now.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423782</id>
	<title>Hmmm....</title>
	<author>silentmonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1268254200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, wouldn&rsquo;t this be a trip if the masses got ahold of these, the average human can&rsquo;t even seem to drive straight on the road systems, what&rsquo;s gonna happen when we jet fuel are asses and head upwards?!?!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)   I wonder what the fine is going to be on one of these if you are caught cruising through the skyscrappers of major cities core.

<a href="http://www.digitalpanther.net/" title="digitalpanther.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.digitalpanther.net/</a> [digitalpanther.net]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , wouldn    t this be a trip if the masses got ahold of these , the average human can    t even seem to drive straight on the road systems , what    s gon na happen when we jet fuel are asses and head upwards ? ! ? !
; ) I wonder what the fine is going to be on one of these if you are caught cruising through the skyscrappers of major cities core .
http : //www.digitalpanther.net/ [ digitalpanther.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, wouldn’t this be a trip if the masses got ahold of these, the average human can’t even seem to drive straight on the road systems, what’s gonna happen when we jet fuel are asses and head upwards?!?!
;)   I wonder what the fine is going to be on one of these if you are caught cruising through the skyscrappers of major cities core.
http://www.digitalpanther.net/ [digitalpanther.net]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422336</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>Av8rjoker</author>
	<datestamp>1268149380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can barely understand how some people are allowed to drive vehicles on a 2D plane. I don't even have my certificate, but I've had two near misses in a Cessna 172 because one pilot, not announcing his intentions on the radio at a small airport, decided to fly in at about 500 feet and cut me off in the pattern on my final; and another helicopter pilot who flew about 50 feet under me just as I took off. Both times I was flying alone and as a student. It was absolutely terrifying. There is no possible way that any of this technology will be standard. If people can't drive cars, they sure as hell can't fly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can barely understand how some people are allowed to drive vehicles on a 2D plane .
I do n't even have my certificate , but I 've had two near misses in a Cessna 172 because one pilot , not announcing his intentions on the radio at a small airport , decided to fly in at about 500 feet and cut me off in the pattern on my final ; and another helicopter pilot who flew about 50 feet under me just as I took off .
Both times I was flying alone and as a student .
It was absolutely terrifying .
There is no possible way that any of this technology will be standard .
If people ca n't drive cars , they sure as hell ca n't fly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can barely understand how some people are allowed to drive vehicles on a 2D plane.
I don't even have my certificate, but I've had two near misses in a Cessna 172 because one pilot, not announcing his intentions on the radio at a small airport, decided to fly in at about 500 feet and cut me off in the pattern on my final; and another helicopter pilot who flew about 50 feet under me just as I took off.
Both times I was flying alone and as a student.
It was absolutely terrifying.
There is no possible way that any of this technology will be standard.
If people can't drive cars, they sure as hell can't fly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424076</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>NewtonsLaw</author>
	<datestamp>1268214840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I see another Moller-like project here.</p><p>The liability issues surrounding a machine like this are enormous -- apart from a promised ballistic parachute, there is no recovery mechanism for engine failure (unlike an airplane or helicopter).  At altitudes of just a hundred feet or so, the ballistic chute won't have enough time to deploy but it's more than high enough to kill the unfortunate occupant.</p><p>This jetpack has been hyped out of all proportion to its practicality and potential.</p><p>In reality, it's little more than another version of the SoloTrek and, even after millions of dollars spent on development, we all know how that project turned out.</p><p>If you really want a personal flying machine then there are other options such as the Mosquito one-man helicopter which are not only cheaper but a damned sight safer to boot.</p><p>The fact that Martin are talking about big deals with unnamed foreign governments at this stage is bogus.  After all, this thing's already had millions thrown at it and despite that, it's never gone higher than a few feet above the ground.</p><p>The Martin jetpack is "one man's dream" and that man (Glenn Martin) was just lucky enough to convince a bunch of people to throw money at it and a gullible public to get excited about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I see another Moller-like project here.The liability issues surrounding a machine like this are enormous -- apart from a promised ballistic parachute , there is no recovery mechanism for engine failure ( unlike an airplane or helicopter ) .
At altitudes of just a hundred feet or so , the ballistic chute wo n't have enough time to deploy but it 's more than high enough to kill the unfortunate occupant.This jetpack has been hyped out of all proportion to its practicality and potential.In reality , it 's little more than another version of the SoloTrek and , even after millions of dollars spent on development , we all know how that project turned out.If you really want a personal flying machine then there are other options such as the Mosquito one-man helicopter which are not only cheaper but a damned sight safer to boot.The fact that Martin are talking about big deals with unnamed foreign governments at this stage is bogus .
After all , this thing 's already had millions thrown at it and despite that , it 's never gone higher than a few feet above the ground.The Martin jetpack is " one man 's dream " and that man ( Glenn Martin ) was just lucky enough to convince a bunch of people to throw money at it and a gullible public to get excited about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see another Moller-like project here.The liability issues surrounding a machine like this are enormous -- apart from a promised ballistic parachute, there is no recovery mechanism for engine failure (unlike an airplane or helicopter).
At altitudes of just a hundred feet or so, the ballistic chute won't have enough time to deploy but it's more than high enough to kill the unfortunate occupant.This jetpack has been hyped out of all proportion to its practicality and potential.In reality, it's little more than another version of the SoloTrek and, even after millions of dollars spent on development, we all know how that project turned out.If you really want a personal flying machine then there are other options such as the Mosquito one-man helicopter which are not only cheaper but a damned sight safer to boot.The fact that Martin are talking about big deals with unnamed foreign governments at this stage is bogus.
After all, this thing's already had millions thrown at it and despite that, it's never gone higher than a few feet above the ground.The Martin jetpack is "one man's dream" and that man (Glenn Martin) was just lucky enough to convince a bunch of people to throw money at it and a gullible public to get excited about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422058</id>
	<title>Photoshopped?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268146020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those outdoor pictures look strange.  The skies are clear, but the pilot and jetpack don't look like they were photographed in direct sunlight.  No apparent jet wash, either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those outdoor pictures look strange .
The skies are clear , but the pilot and jetpack do n't look like they were photographed in direct sunlight .
No apparent jet wash , either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those outdoor pictures look strange.
The skies are clear, but the pilot and jetpack don't look like they were photographed in direct sunlight.
No apparent jet wash, either.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423112</id>
	<title>Re:Short Ranged</title>
	<author>WiseWeasel</author>
	<datestamp>1268157060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, that's about 29.5 miles further than other "jetpacks" can fly. 30 miles in a straight line covers a great many people's daily commutes, and it uses regular gasoline, not 90+\% hydrogen peroxide, which you can't buy anywhere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , that 's about 29.5 miles further than other " jetpacks " can fly .
30 miles in a straight line covers a great many people 's daily commutes , and it uses regular gasoline , not 90 + \ % hydrogen peroxide , which you ca n't buy anywhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, that's about 29.5 miles further than other "jetpacks" can fly.
30 miles in a straight line covers a great many people's daily commutes, and it uses regular gasoline, not 90+\% hydrogen peroxide, which you can't buy anywhere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422946</id>
	<title>No shirt, no service</title>
	<author>failedlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1268155020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So you walk into a store or mall, they tell you - No Shirt, no service. No smoking in the building. No Skateboards. No Pets. Since you wear this on your back and there's really no space for parking, how will the shopping malls accommodate to its customers?</p><p>I don't forsee the need for a No Jet Pack sticker. Its going to be just one more thing to remember. They can enlarge the doors to let you walk into the store with your jetpack. The only problem I see is that they'll have to increase the size of the aisles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you walk into a store or mall , they tell you - No Shirt , no service .
No smoking in the building .
No Skateboards .
No Pets .
Since you wear this on your back and there 's really no space for parking , how will the shopping malls accommodate to its customers ? I do n't forsee the need for a No Jet Pack sticker .
Its going to be just one more thing to remember .
They can enlarge the doors to let you walk into the store with your jetpack .
The only problem I see is that they 'll have to increase the size of the aisles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you walk into a store or mall, they tell you - No Shirt, no service.
No smoking in the building.
No Skateboards.
No Pets.
Since you wear this on your back and there's really no space for parking, how will the shopping malls accommodate to its customers?I don't forsee the need for a No Jet Pack sticker.
Its going to be just one more thing to remember.
They can enlarge the doors to let you walk into the store with your jetpack.
The only problem I see is that they'll have to increase the size of the aisles.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422888</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>Av8rjoker</author>
	<datestamp>1268154360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>"when done properly" is the key phrase there. Flying is HIGHLY regulated by the government. For one, you need a medical certificate to fly which needs to be updated every few years (depending on what class it is). Also, you need a certified AP mechanic to sign off on your aircraft. With a car, your drunk neighbor can basically build a car for you, and as long as you acquired a driver's license.... even 50 years ago.... you can drive it. As long as you are 18 (in Wisconsin at least), you don't even need a driver's education course. All you need to do is pass the test, which is ridiculously easy, and you get a license for the rest of your life.

Now, I have flown in a few aircraft that were slightly "questionable", but they were definitely airworthy. It is a bit scary pulling out the throttle and having the knob immediately pop off hehe. Also going into the clouds for the first time and having your VOR about 15 degrees off (I think I got a few more gray hairs on that one). My point is that the reason why flying is so safe is because it is extremely regulated. If everyone's car went through the same maintenance procedure as a Cessna 150 built in the mid 50s, then we would have almost no broken down cars on the highway. If the drivers were put through the same sort of training as pilots, we would have far fewer accidents.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" when done properly " is the key phrase there .
Flying is HIGHLY regulated by the government .
For one , you need a medical certificate to fly which needs to be updated every few years ( depending on what class it is ) .
Also , you need a certified AP mechanic to sign off on your aircraft .
With a car , your drunk neighbor can basically build a car for you , and as long as you acquired a driver 's license.... even 50 years ago.... you can drive it .
As long as you are 18 ( in Wisconsin at least ) , you do n't even need a driver 's education course .
All you need to do is pass the test , which is ridiculously easy , and you get a license for the rest of your life .
Now , I have flown in a few aircraft that were slightly " questionable " , but they were definitely airworthy .
It is a bit scary pulling out the throttle and having the knob immediately pop off hehe .
Also going into the clouds for the first time and having your VOR about 15 degrees off ( I think I got a few more gray hairs on that one ) .
My point is that the reason why flying is so safe is because it is extremely regulated .
If everyone 's car went through the same maintenance procedure as a Cessna 150 built in the mid 50s , then we would have almost no broken down cars on the highway .
If the drivers were put through the same sort of training as pilots , we would have far fewer accidents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"when done properly" is the key phrase there.
Flying is HIGHLY regulated by the government.
For one, you need a medical certificate to fly which needs to be updated every few years (depending on what class it is).
Also, you need a certified AP mechanic to sign off on your aircraft.
With a car, your drunk neighbor can basically build a car for you, and as long as you acquired a driver's license.... even 50 years ago.... you can drive it.
As long as you are 18 (in Wisconsin at least), you don't even need a driver's education course.
All you need to do is pass the test, which is ridiculously easy, and you get a license for the rest of your life.
Now, I have flown in a few aircraft that were slightly "questionable", but they were definitely airworthy.
It is a bit scary pulling out the throttle and having the knob immediately pop off hehe.
Also going into the clouds for the first time and having your VOR about 15 degrees off (I think I got a few more gray hairs on that one).
My point is that the reason why flying is so safe is because it is extremely regulated.
If everyone's car went through the same maintenance procedure as a Cessna 150 built in the mid 50s, then we would have almost no broken down cars on the highway.
If the drivers were put through the same sort of training as pilots, we would have far fewer accidents.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421814</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1268144040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will they use <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket\_Man\_(song)" title="wikipedia.org">this song</a> [wikipedia.org] for their TV ads?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will they use this song [ wikipedia.org ] for their TV ads ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will they use this song [wikipedia.org] for their TV ads?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422204</id>
	<title>It's not a jet pack and it defeats the purpose</title>
	<author>DrBuzzo</author>
	<datestamp>1268147640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can't walk around with it.  It has a dry weight of 250 lbs.   In other words - it's not Man Portable.   That's the critical thing about a proper jetpack.   You can walk around with a jetpack.  You can take off, fly to the store, walk into the store, buy something, then fly away, land somewhere else, talk to someone about how cool your jet pack is and then fly away again.
<br> <br>
If it's not man portable, it may still be cool, but it defeats the purpose of a jet pack.   You may as well strap yourself to the side of a full sized helicopter and fly around like that.  For that matter, why not just sit inside the helicopter.
<br> <br>
Also it's not a jetpack.  The bell jetbelt was a jetpack because it used a WR-19 turbine jet engine.   This doesn't.   It uses ducted fans which aren't even powered by a gas turbine.  There's nothing jet about it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't walk around with it .
It has a dry weight of 250 lbs .
In other words - it 's not Man Portable .
That 's the critical thing about a proper jetpack .
You can walk around with a jetpack .
You can take off , fly to the store , walk into the store , buy something , then fly away , land somewhere else , talk to someone about how cool your jet pack is and then fly away again .
If it 's not man portable , it may still be cool , but it defeats the purpose of a jet pack .
You may as well strap yourself to the side of a full sized helicopter and fly around like that .
For that matter , why not just sit inside the helicopter .
Also it 's not a jetpack .
The bell jetbelt was a jetpack because it used a WR-19 turbine jet engine .
This does n't .
It uses ducted fans which are n't even powered by a gas turbine .
There 's nothing jet about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't walk around with it.
It has a dry weight of 250 lbs.
In other words - it's not Man Portable.
That's the critical thing about a proper jetpack.
You can walk around with a jetpack.
You can take off, fly to the store, walk into the store, buy something, then fly away, land somewhere else, talk to someone about how cool your jet pack is and then fly away again.
If it's not man portable, it may still be cool, but it defeats the purpose of a jet pack.
You may as well strap yourself to the side of a full sized helicopter and fly around like that.
For that matter, why not just sit inside the helicopter.
Also it's not a jetpack.
The bell jetbelt was a jetpack because it used a WR-19 turbine jet engine.
This doesn't.
It uses ducted fans which aren't even powered by a gas turbine.
There's nothing jet about it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31438338</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>LordVader717</author>
	<datestamp>1268325840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Not really. Flying, when done properly will be -a lot- more safe than driving.</p></div><p>So at the moment, this is pure speculation.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>With flying, unlike driving you go not just left and right but also up and down. Mix this with the fact that there are no roads (meaning to get to the same place two people can easily take routes miles apart) and you have the ability to reduce, eliminate traffic problems that exist in traditional traffic.</p></div><p>First of all, this is under the assumption that these will be useful for transportation. But even for the wealthy the fuel bills for one of these things will be staggering. And considering the maintainence it would require it's probably unlikely that anybody but a scarce few would use it regularly.<br>But you seem to think the biggest risk is a aerial collision. That's simply wrong. The most dangerous parts of air travel are taking off and landing. This is where air travel is inevitably much more dangerous than road traffic because of the huge heights and speeds involved mean that in the event of an accident death is extremely likely.<br>The reason why accidents are rare today is only because of the huge amount of caution and regulation that we have. There is an extensive network of Radio communication so that pilots and traffic controllers can negotiate landing slots. The Pilot must be trained to deal with these situations and also has to have regular checks. You must have a permit to fly and airports are located far from residential buildings (at least for operating riskier small aircraft).<br>With jetpacks people will want to be hovering round buildings and landing somewhere other than an open airfield. They can't wait around in the air for permission to land either. And while bumping you car when you're parking is just going to scratch the paint, bumping into the side of a building while landing a jetpack is probably one the worst kinds of accidents and could result in your body being splattered all over the ground.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not really .
Flying , when done properly will be -a lot- more safe than driving.So at the moment , this is pure speculation.With flying , unlike driving you go not just left and right but also up and down .
Mix this with the fact that there are no roads ( meaning to get to the same place two people can easily take routes miles apart ) and you have the ability to reduce , eliminate traffic problems that exist in traditional traffic.First of all , this is under the assumption that these will be useful for transportation .
But even for the wealthy the fuel bills for one of these things will be staggering .
And considering the maintainence it would require it 's probably unlikely that anybody but a scarce few would use it regularly.But you seem to think the biggest risk is a aerial collision .
That 's simply wrong .
The most dangerous parts of air travel are taking off and landing .
This is where air travel is inevitably much more dangerous than road traffic because of the huge heights and speeds involved mean that in the event of an accident death is extremely likely.The reason why accidents are rare today is only because of the huge amount of caution and regulation that we have .
There is an extensive network of Radio communication so that pilots and traffic controllers can negotiate landing slots .
The Pilot must be trained to deal with these situations and also has to have regular checks .
You must have a permit to fly and airports are located far from residential buildings ( at least for operating riskier small aircraft ) .With jetpacks people will want to be hovering round buildings and landing somewhere other than an open airfield .
They ca n't wait around in the air for permission to land either .
And while bumping you car when you 're parking is just going to scratch the paint , bumping into the side of a building while landing a jetpack is probably one the worst kinds of accidents and could result in your body being splattered all over the ground .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not really.
Flying, when done properly will be -a lot- more safe than driving.So at the moment, this is pure speculation.With flying, unlike driving you go not just left and right but also up and down.
Mix this with the fact that there are no roads (meaning to get to the same place two people can easily take routes miles apart) and you have the ability to reduce, eliminate traffic problems that exist in traditional traffic.First of all, this is under the assumption that these will be useful for transportation.
But even for the wealthy the fuel bills for one of these things will be staggering.
And considering the maintainence it would require it's probably unlikely that anybody but a scarce few would use it regularly.But you seem to think the biggest risk is a aerial collision.
That's simply wrong.
The most dangerous parts of air travel are taking off and landing.
This is where air travel is inevitably much more dangerous than road traffic because of the huge heights and speeds involved mean that in the event of an accident death is extremely likely.The reason why accidents are rare today is only because of the huge amount of caution and regulation that we have.
There is an extensive network of Radio communication so that pilots and traffic controllers can negotiate landing slots.
The Pilot must be trained to deal with these situations and also has to have regular checks.
You must have a permit to fly and airports are located far from residential buildings (at least for operating riskier small aircraft).With jetpacks people will want to be hovering round buildings and landing somewhere other than an open airfield.
They can't wait around in the air for permission to land either.
And while bumping you car when you're parking is just going to scratch the paint, bumping into the side of a building while landing a jetpack is probably one the worst kinds of accidents and could result in your body being splattered all over the ground.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>icebike</author>
	<datestamp>1268143800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly.</p><p>This is one of those things that is seemingly announced annually, and never seems to get any closer than a few prototypes.</p><p>Flying is dangerous.  A sky full of unregulated idiots is even more scary. Luckily the price tag is high, probably to fund the lawyers they will need.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly.This is one of those things that is seemingly announced annually , and never seems to get any closer than a few prototypes.Flying is dangerous .
A sky full of unregulated idiots is even more scary .
Luckily the price tag is high , probably to fund the lawyers they will need .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.This is one of those things that is seemingly announced annually, and never seems to get any closer than a few prototypes.Flying is dangerous.
A sky full of unregulated idiots is even more scary.
Luckily the price tag is high, probably to fund the lawyers they will need.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421818</id>
	<title>Short Ranged</title>
	<author>Game\_Ender</author>
	<datestamp>1268144100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It only has a 30 mile range and gets just 0.5 hours of flight time with its 5 gallons of fuel.  Not exactly the best commute vehicle. Source: <a href="http://www.martinjetpack.com/technical-information.aspx" title="martinjetpack.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.martinjetpack.com/technical-information.aspx</a> [martinjetpack.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>It only has a 30 mile range and gets just 0.5 hours of flight time with its 5 gallons of fuel .
Not exactly the best commute vehicle .
Source : http : //www.martinjetpack.com/technical-information.aspx [ martinjetpack.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It only has a 30 mile range and gets just 0.5 hours of flight time with its 5 gallons of fuel.
Not exactly the best commute vehicle.
Source: http://www.martinjetpack.com/technical-information.aspx [martinjetpack.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421916</id>
	<title>Turbines, not jets.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268144940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Should be called a "turbopack".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Should be called a " turbopack " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Should be called a "turbopack".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424776</id>
	<title>Wait a second..</title>
	<author>(arg!)Styopa</author>
	<datestamp>1268226420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shouldn't this article have a link to the Darwin Awards somewhere in it?</p><p><a href="http://www.darwinawards.com/" title="darwinawards.com">http://www.darwinawards.com/</a> [darwinawards.com]</p><p>Please, if you're going to buy a jetpack, please don't breed FIRST.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Should n't this article have a link to the Darwin Awards somewhere in it ? http : //www.darwinawards.com/ [ darwinawards.com ] Please , if you 're going to buy a jetpack , please do n't breed FIRST .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shouldn't this article have a link to the Darwin Awards somewhere in it?http://www.darwinawards.com/ [darwinawards.com]Please, if you're going to buy a jetpack, please don't breed FIRST.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422994</id>
	<title>This is nothing but a very early prototype.</title>
	<author>GNUALMAFUERTE</author>
	<datestamp>1268155560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are having surely huge issues with it's stability and control. I'm also sure it's not generating enough thrust. In all videos they show, two man are holding the device down, pretending that it's because of safety concerns. Bullshit. If they let it go, it'll go crazy and crash into the ground. There's only ONE video of the thing flying by itself, and it's INDOORS (Yeah, no wind at all), it doesn't go higher than half a meter off the ground, it doesn't move at all (It just floats there, and then it rotates on it's own axis), and the flight only lasts 30 seconds. The other video that shows the thing flying in outdoors (not fully outdoors, it's a backyard, well protected against wind), the camera is carefully positioned on the helmet, so that whatever is holding it still, can't be seen. There's no video from other points, only the on-helmet camera. And the video only lasts 10 seconds. And it's cut off mid-flight.</p><p>Nothing to see here folks, move along.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are having surely huge issues with it 's stability and control .
I 'm also sure it 's not generating enough thrust .
In all videos they show , two man are holding the device down , pretending that it 's because of safety concerns .
Bullshit. If they let it go , it 'll go crazy and crash into the ground .
There 's only ONE video of the thing flying by itself , and it 's INDOORS ( Yeah , no wind at all ) , it does n't go higher than half a meter off the ground , it does n't move at all ( It just floats there , and then it rotates on it 's own axis ) , and the flight only lasts 30 seconds .
The other video that shows the thing flying in outdoors ( not fully outdoors , it 's a backyard , well protected against wind ) , the camera is carefully positioned on the helmet , so that whatever is holding it still , ca n't be seen .
There 's no video from other points , only the on-helmet camera .
And the video only lasts 10 seconds .
And it 's cut off mid-flight.Nothing to see here folks , move along .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are having surely huge issues with it's stability and control.
I'm also sure it's not generating enough thrust.
In all videos they show, two man are holding the device down, pretending that it's because of safety concerns.
Bullshit. If they let it go, it'll go crazy and crash into the ground.
There's only ONE video of the thing flying by itself, and it's INDOORS (Yeah, no wind at all), it doesn't go higher than half a meter off the ground, it doesn't move at all (It just floats there, and then it rotates on it's own axis), and the flight only lasts 30 seconds.
The other video that shows the thing flying in outdoors (not fully outdoors, it's a backyard, well protected against wind), the camera is carefully positioned on the helmet, so that whatever is holding it still, can't be seen.
There's no video from other points, only the on-helmet camera.
And the video only lasts 10 seconds.
And it's cut off mid-flight.Nothing to see here folks, move along.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31426732</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>b0bby</author>
	<datestamp>1268239200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Flying, when done properly will be -a lot- more safe than driving.</p> </div><p>I think you mean, driving when done properly will be a lot safer than flying. If getting a driver's license was like getting a pilot's license, there'd be a lot lees problems on the roads.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Flying , when done properly will be -a lot- more safe than driving .
I think you mean , driving when done properly will be a lot safer than flying .
If getting a driver 's license was like getting a pilot 's license , there 'd be a lot lees problems on the roads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flying, when done properly will be -a lot- more safe than driving.
I think you mean, driving when done properly will be a lot safer than flying.
If getting a driver's license was like getting a pilot's license, there'd be a lot lees problems on the roads.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423614</id>
	<title>At that price, why not a plane?</title>
	<author>JeffTL</author>
	<datestamp>1268252100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>About $80K?  Give me a break.  I don't know how the learning curve differs, but you can get a small airplane for quite a bit less than that...plenty of general aviation airports out there, I know that much.  It's an interesting idea and something might yet come of it, but when you can buy a used plane for so much less, I don't think it's anywhere near commercially viable yet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>About $ 80K ?
Give me a break .
I do n't know how the learning curve differs , but you can get a small airplane for quite a bit less than that...plenty of general aviation airports out there , I know that much .
It 's an interesting idea and something might yet come of it , but when you can buy a used plane for so much less , I do n't think it 's anywhere near commercially viable yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>About $80K?
Give me a break.
I don't know how the learning curve differs, but you can get a small airplane for quite a bit less than that...plenty of general aviation airports out there, I know that much.
It's an interesting idea and something might yet come of it, but when you can buy a used plane for so much less, I don't think it's anywhere near commercially viable yet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422078</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>edumacator</author>
	<datestamp>1268146200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Where's my god damned flying car?!!</p></div></blockquote><p>Please, we've had <a href="http://www.wired.com/autopia/2010/03/oldest-attempt-at-a-flying-car-up-for-auction" title="wired.com">flying cars</a> [wired.com] since the 1930s. Duke Nukem Forever, I can't help you with...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where 's my god damned flying car ? !
! Please , we 've had flying cars [ wired.com ] since the 1930s .
Duke Nukem Forever , I ca n't help you with.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where's my god damned flying car?!
!Please, we've had flying cars [wired.com] since the 1930s.
Duke Nukem Forever, I can't help you with...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423696</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268253360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Where's my god damned flying car?!!</p></div><p> <a href="http://moller.com/index.php?option=com\_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=49&amp;Itemid=57" title="moller.com" rel="nofollow">Here</a> [moller.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where 's my god damned flying car ? ! !
Here [ moller.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where's my god damned flying car?!!
Here [moller.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424390</id>
	<title>Re:This is nothing but a very early prototype.</title>
	<author>osu-neko</author>
	<datestamp>1268220060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's only ONE video of the thing flying by itself, and it's INDOORS (Yeah, no wind at all), it doesn't go higher than half a meter off the ground, it doesn't move at all (It just floats there, and then it rotates on it's own axis), and the flight only lasts 30 seconds.</p></div><p>Actually, it does move around in the indoor video.  You need to watch more than the first 30 seconds of the 90 second flight.  Either that, or you're talking about a completely different video than the one linked to in the summary, in which case, it's not true that's there's only one video, since you've apparently seen a second one that's different than the 90 second one where it actually flies around.  Apparently, based on your description, the only thing the two videos have in common is that they're indoors.  You should watch the longer one.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's only ONE video of the thing flying by itself , and it 's INDOORS ( Yeah , no wind at all ) , it does n't go higher than half a meter off the ground , it does n't move at all ( It just floats there , and then it rotates on it 's own axis ) , and the flight only lasts 30 seconds.Actually , it does move around in the indoor video .
You need to watch more than the first 30 seconds of the 90 second flight .
Either that , or you 're talking about a completely different video than the one linked to in the summary , in which case , it 's not true that 's there 's only one video , since you 've apparently seen a second one that 's different than the 90 second one where it actually flies around .
Apparently , based on your description , the only thing the two videos have in common is that they 're indoors .
You should watch the longer one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's only ONE video of the thing flying by itself, and it's INDOORS (Yeah, no wind at all), it doesn't go higher than half a meter off the ground, it doesn't move at all (It just floats there, and then it rotates on it's own axis), and the flight only lasts 30 seconds.Actually, it does move around in the indoor video.
You need to watch more than the first 30 seconds of the 90 second flight.
Either that, or you're talking about a completely different video than the one linked to in the summary, in which case, it's not true that's there's only one video, since you've apparently seen a second one that's different than the 90 second one where it actually flies around.
Apparently, based on your description, the only thing the two videos have in common is that they're indoors.
You should watch the longer one.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422932</id>
	<title>FAA certification</title>
	<author>T-Bucket</author>
	<datestamp>1268154840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't this fall under that little-used "Powered Lift" category? Looks to me like they already have standards set up for it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't this fall under that little-used " Powered Lift " category ?
Looks to me like they already have standards set up for it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't this fall under that little-used "Powered Lift" category?
Looks to me like they already have standards set up for it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31438556</id>
	<title>Re:It's not a jet pack and it defeats the purpose</title>
	<author>Shotgun</author>
	<datestamp>1268326320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><b>You</b> can't walk around with it.  250lbs isn't all that much.  What you meant to say is that it isn't Slashdot Geek Portable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't walk around with it .
250lbs is n't all that much .
What you meant to say is that it is n't Slashdot Geek Portable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't walk around with it.
250lbs isn't all that much.
What you meant to say is that it isn't Slashdot Geek Portable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422204</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1268147940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Flying is dangerous. A sky full of unregulated idiots is even more scary. Luckily the price tag is high, probably to fund the lawyers they will need.</p> </div><p>

Not really. Flying, when done properly will be -a lot- more safe than driving. With flying, unlike driving you go not just left and right but also up and down. Mix this with the fact that there are no roads (meaning to get to the same place two people can easily take routes miles apart) and you have the ability to reduce, eliminate traffic problems that exist in traditional traffic. <br> <br>

Also, never underestimate the fact of self-preservation, when encountered in a life threatening situation, people tend to do the right thing and move away from danger. People are self-regulating when it comes to life and death.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Flying is dangerous .
A sky full of unregulated idiots is even more scary .
Luckily the price tag is high , probably to fund the lawyers they will need .
Not really .
Flying , when done properly will be -a lot- more safe than driving .
With flying , unlike driving you go not just left and right but also up and down .
Mix this with the fact that there are no roads ( meaning to get to the same place two people can easily take routes miles apart ) and you have the ability to reduce , eliminate traffic problems that exist in traditional traffic .
Also , never underestimate the fact of self-preservation , when encountered in a life threatening situation , people tend to do the right thing and move away from danger .
People are self-regulating when it comes to life and death .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Flying is dangerous.
A sky full of unregulated idiots is even more scary.
Luckily the price tag is high, probably to fund the lawyers they will need.
Not really.
Flying, when done properly will be -a lot- more safe than driving.
With flying, unlike driving you go not just left and right but also up and down.
Mix this with the fact that there are no roads (meaning to get to the same place two people can easily take routes miles apart) and you have the ability to reduce, eliminate traffic problems that exist in traditional traffic.
Also, never underestimate the fact of self-preservation, when encountered in a life threatening situation, people tend to do the right thing and move away from danger.
People are self-regulating when it comes to life and death.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421934</id>
	<title>whatcouldpossiblygowrong?</title>
	<author>Trip6</author>
	<datestamp>1268145120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sign me up for one of these AFTER the deaths per hour rate has been well-established.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sign me up for one of these AFTER the deaths per hour rate has been well-established .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sign me up for one of these AFTER the deaths per hour rate has been well-established.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423866</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>nscott89</author>
	<datestamp>1268211960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's fine but.... Why is everyone complaining?!? Now I can fly like Superman!!! Up, up, and away! Well, err... not faster than a speeding bullet...  Oh ok. I'll wait for the Mk II model.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's fine but.... Why is everyone complaining ? ! ?
Now I can fly like Superman ! ! !
Up , up , and away !
Well , err... not faster than a speeding bullet... Oh ok. I 'll wait for the Mk II model .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's fine but.... Why is everyone complaining?!?
Now I can fly like Superman!!!
Up, up, and away!
Well, err... not faster than a speeding bullet...  Oh ok. I'll wait for the Mk II model.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31425778</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1268234820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>As long as you are 18 (in Wisconsin at least), you don't even need a driver's education course. All you need to do is pass the test, which is ridiculously easy, and you get a license for the rest of your life.</p></div></blockquote><p>Wisconsin is different then than the states I've held a driver's license in then.  Everywhere I've lived, a license isn't for life but must be renewed at regular intervals and part of the renewal process is always an eye exam.  (Here in Washington, if you have points on your record they may also require a written test and/or a driving test.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as you are 18 ( in Wisconsin at least ) , you do n't even need a driver 's education course .
All you need to do is pass the test , which is ridiculously easy , and you get a license for the rest of your life.Wisconsin is different then than the states I 've held a driver 's license in then .
Everywhere I 've lived , a license is n't for life but must be renewed at regular intervals and part of the renewal process is always an eye exam .
( Here in Washington , if you have points on your record they may also require a written test and/or a driving test .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as you are 18 (in Wisconsin at least), you don't even need a driver's education course.
All you need to do is pass the test, which is ridiculously easy, and you get a license for the rest of your life.Wisconsin is different then than the states I've held a driver's license in then.
Everywhere I've lived, a license isn't for life but must be renewed at regular intervals and part of the renewal process is always an eye exam.
(Here in Washington, if you have points on your record they may also require a written test and/or a driving test.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422152</id>
	<title>Re:Not a jetpack</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268147040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A ducted <i>van</i>?!</p><p>There's some joke about<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. car analogies to be made here, but I'm too busy wondering at the sheer awesomeness of the concept to think of them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A ducted van ?
! There 's some joke about / .
car analogies to be made here , but I 'm too busy wondering at the sheer awesomeness of the concept to think of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A ducted van?
!There's some joke about /.
car analogies to be made here, but I'm too busy wondering at the sheer awesomeness of the concept to think of them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421910</id>
	<title>**Shudders**</title>
	<author>wolf12886</author>
	<datestamp>1268144940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And to think, I've heard of people spending 100k on a nice kitchen or a sports car.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And to think , I 've heard of people spending 100k on a nice kitchen or a sports car .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And to think, I've heard of people spending 100k on a nice kitchen or a sports car.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423216</id>
	<title>Well...I guess I have to change my sig.</title>
	<author>Interoperable</author>
	<datestamp>1268158200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It was good while it lasted.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was good while it lasted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was good while it lasted.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421900</id>
	<title>Re:nah</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268144820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TEQUILLA POWER!</p><p>- funny guy, his daughter has my utmost sympathy though - "I strapped her in, then invited the Press.  She couldnt back out then.."</p><p>Still, as he states, hasnt killed anyone.  Yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TEQUILLA POWER ! - funny guy , his daughter has my utmost sympathy though - " I strapped her in , then invited the Press .
She couldnt back out then.. " Still , as he states , hasnt killed anyone .
Yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TEQUILLA POWER!- funny guy, his daughter has my utmost sympathy though - "I strapped her in, then invited the Press.
She couldnt back out then.."Still, as he states, hasnt killed anyone.
Yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421760</id>
	<title>better flight</title>
	<author>gamecrusader</author>
	<datestamp>1268143560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what can go possibly wrong with this<br>I know if someon decides to put rocke fuel instead of gasoline<br>jet fuel instead of gasoline<br>add nitro to increase preformance<br>this will be interesting how this plays out</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what can go possibly wrong with thisI know if someon decides to put rocke fuel instead of gasolinejet fuel instead of gasolineadd nitro to increase preformancethis will be interesting how this plays out</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what can go possibly wrong with thisI know if someon decides to put rocke fuel instead of gasolinejet fuel instead of gasolineadd nitro to increase preformancethis will be interesting how this plays out</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31425552</id>
	<title>Who want to bet..</title>
	<author>chord.wav</author>
	<datestamp>1268233380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..that the first kill by one of these is a multi-millionaire executive of a top company that missed to reach his office's window on the 100th floor after commuting from a distance which burned most of his fuel?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..that the first kill by one of these is a multi-millionaire executive of a top company that missed to reach his office 's window on the 100th floor after commuting from a distance which burned most of his fuel ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..that the first kill by one of these is a multi-millionaire executive of a top company that missed to reach his office's window on the 100th floor after commuting from a distance which burned most of his fuel?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423342</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>Antique Geekmeister</author>
	<datestamp>1268159880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On what \_possible\_ basis do you make this claim? With home jetpacks, (or more likely the jetwings at www.jet-man.com), you open the world to a lot of poorly maintained one-man craft that can drop out of the sky onto \_anything\_. And while there may be "no roads", there are a relatively limited set of common destinations.</p><p>Your belief that "people are self-regulationg when it comes to life and death" is also founded in, I'm sorry to say, complete fantasy. Take a good look at the number of people who smoke, overeat, engage in unsafe sex, are under-insured, and text while driving for examples of very porly regulating the risks of life and death.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On what \ _possible \ _ basis do you make this claim ?
With home jetpacks , ( or more likely the jetwings at www.jet-man.com ) , you open the world to a lot of poorly maintained one-man craft that can drop out of the sky onto \ _anything \ _ .
And while there may be " no roads " , there are a relatively limited set of common destinations.Your belief that " people are self-regulationg when it comes to life and death " is also founded in , I 'm sorry to say , complete fantasy .
Take a good look at the number of people who smoke , overeat , engage in unsafe sex , are under-insured , and text while driving for examples of very porly regulating the risks of life and death .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On what \_possible\_ basis do you make this claim?
With home jetpacks, (or more likely the jetwings at www.jet-man.com), you open the world to a lot of poorly maintained one-man craft that can drop out of the sky onto \_anything\_.
And while there may be "no roads", there are a relatively limited set of common destinations.Your belief that "people are self-regulationg when it comes to life and death" is also founded in, I'm sorry to say, complete fantasy.
Take a good look at the number of people who smoke, overeat, engage in unsafe sex, are under-insured, and text while driving for examples of very porly regulating the risks of life and death.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421896</id>
	<title>A motorcycle for flying</title>
	<author>tchdab1</author>
	<datestamp>1268144820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the protective equivalent of a motorcycle.</p><p>I hope it has a big plastic bag in it to collect body parts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the protective equivalent of a motorcycle.I hope it has a big plastic bag in it to collect body parts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the protective equivalent of a motorcycle.I hope it has a big plastic bag in it to collect body parts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422268</id>
	<title>power paragliding seems to beat this hands down</title>
	<author>siddesu</author>
	<datestamp>1268148600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The gear costs less than the deposit on this thing, there is no waiting, and it is immense fun. Besides, for paragliding you don't need a license, so you can start trying to kill yourself right away. This says "ultralight", so probably needs a license. (Note: paragliding without license may be allowed, but doing so without adequate training is pretty lethal).</htmltext>
<tokenext>The gear costs less than the deposit on this thing , there is no waiting , and it is immense fun .
Besides , for paragliding you do n't need a license , so you can start trying to kill yourself right away .
This says " ultralight " , so probably needs a license .
( Note : paragliding without license may be allowed , but doing so without adequate training is pretty lethal ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The gear costs less than the deposit on this thing, there is no waiting, and it is immense fun.
Besides, for paragliding you don't need a license, so you can start trying to kill yourself right away.
This says "ultralight", so probably needs a license.
(Note: paragliding without license may be allowed, but doing so without adequate training is pretty lethal).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31430770</id>
	<title>Wot no Wankel?</title>
	<author>turgid</author>
	<datestamp>1268214720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When power to wight ratio and reliability are crucial, why on earth are they using a plain old piston engine when they could be using a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wankel\_engine" title="wikipedia.org">Wankel</a> [wikipedia.org]? Are they stuck in the 1940s?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When power to wight ratio and reliability are crucial , why on earth are they using a plain old piston engine when they could be using a Wankel [ wikipedia.org ] ?
Are they stuck in the 1940s ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When power to wight ratio and reliability are crucial, why on earth are they using a plain old piston engine when they could be using a Wankel [wikipedia.org]?
Are they stuck in the 1940s?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422954</id>
	<title>I call Shenanigans</title>
	<author>Low Ranked Craig</author>
	<datestamp>1268155020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Adam and Jami couldn't build it so this must be fake.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Adam and Jami could n't build it so this must be fake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Adam and Jami couldn't build it so this must be fake.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31430178</id>
	<title>Deposit</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1268211840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A 10\% deposit buys you a production slot for 12 months hence.</p></div><p>If I put down a 20\% deposit, can I get cutsies?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A 10 \ % deposit buys you a production slot for 12 months hence.If I put down a 20 \ % deposit , can I get cutsies ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A 10\% deposit buys you a production slot for 12 months hence.If I put down a 20\% deposit, can I get cutsies?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422626</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>Sulphur</author>
	<datestamp>1268151960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not the way I drive.</p><p>Centauri is that you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not the way I drive.Centauri is that you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not the way I drive.Centauri is that you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421932</id>
	<title>'Jetpack' my patootie</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1268145120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's not a 'jetpack'... it's a <b>VTOL without the jet</b>.  And just as noisy... it's a boom box car that breaks wind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not a 'jetpack'... it 's a VTOL without the jet .
And just as noisy... it 's a boom box car that breaks wind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not a 'jetpack'... it's a VTOL without the jet.
And just as noisy... it's a boom box car that breaks wind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31428694</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>kalirion</author>
	<datestamp>1268248320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Not really. Flying, when done properly will be -a lot- more safe than driving. With flying, unlike driving you go not just left and right but also up and down. Mix this with the fact that there are no roads (meaning to get to the same place two people can easily take routes miles apart) and you have the ability to reduce, eliminate traffic problems that exist in traditional traffic.</i></p><p>Ah yes, that's why air traffic controllers have such cushy, relaxing jobs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not really .
Flying , when done properly will be -a lot- more safe than driving .
With flying , unlike driving you go not just left and right but also up and down .
Mix this with the fact that there are no roads ( meaning to get to the same place two people can easily take routes miles apart ) and you have the ability to reduce , eliminate traffic problems that exist in traditional traffic.Ah yes , that 's why air traffic controllers have such cushy , relaxing jobs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not really.
Flying, when done properly will be -a lot- more safe than driving.
With flying, unlike driving you go not just left and right but also up and down.
Mix this with the fact that there are no roads (meaning to get to the same place two people can easily take routes miles apart) and you have the ability to reduce, eliminate traffic problems that exist in traditional traffic.Ah yes, that's why air traffic controllers have such cushy, relaxing jobs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31435340</id>
	<title>Rescue e.g. Rock Climbers ?</title>
	<author>hashstamp</author>
	<datestamp>1268340660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Darwin-awards-wise, one might wish that folks who get in trouble say on El Capitan should be left to nature, but a device like this would seem potentially safer than a Helicopter, you can imagine just plucking a climber off a wall.  The Google Query (( rescue helicopter crash rainier )) finds articles related to that video I saw once where the blades just brushed the snow, bye bye.  With the ducted fans this device seems to fix that problem.  No mention of the theoretical altitude ceiling, say with improved engine, still way cheaper than a helicopter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Darwin-awards-wise , one might wish that folks who get in trouble say on El Capitan should be left to nature , but a device like this would seem potentially safer than a Helicopter , you can imagine just plucking a climber off a wall .
The Google Query ( ( rescue helicopter crash rainier ) ) finds articles related to that video I saw once where the blades just brushed the snow , bye bye .
With the ducted fans this device seems to fix that problem .
No mention of the theoretical altitude ceiling , say with improved engine , still way cheaper than a helicopter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Darwin-awards-wise, one might wish that folks who get in trouble say on El Capitan should be left to nature, but a device like this would seem potentially safer than a Helicopter, you can imagine just plucking a climber off a wall.
The Google Query (( rescue helicopter crash rainier )) finds articles related to that video I saw once where the blades just brushed the snow, bye bye.
With the ducted fans this device seems to fix that problem.
No mention of the theoretical altitude ceiling, say with improved engine, still way cheaper than a helicopter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422738</id>
	<title>Dentasmile MD</title>
	<author>junadi</author>
	<datestamp>1268152920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Those look more like turbofan engines to me. Plus it would be kind of a pain in the a*s to have two guys with you all the time to guide you around.
<a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/health-articles/dentasmile-md-review-does-denta-smile-md-work-1961389.html" title="articlesbase.com" rel="nofollow">Dentasmile MD</a> [articlesbase.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those look more like turbofan engines to me .
Plus it would be kind of a pain in the a * s to have two guys with you all the time to guide you around .
Dentasmile MD [ articlesbase.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those look more like turbofan engines to me.
Plus it would be kind of a pain in the a*s to have two guys with you all the time to guide you around.
Dentasmile MD [articlesbase.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422150</id>
	<title>iJet</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1268147040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Have wires, needs more space than a nomad. Lame.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have wires , needs more space than a nomad .
Lame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have wires, needs more space than a nomad.
Lame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422428</id>
	<title>Is this Glenn Martin related to Glenn L. Martin?</title>
	<author>grandpa-geek</author>
	<datestamp>1268150160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The story is about a Glenn Martin of New Zealand.</p><p>Many years ago, I worked at the Glenn L. Martin Company in Middle River, Maryland, just outside Baltimore.  That company later became part of Martin-Marietta and was merged into Lockheed-Martin.</p><p>Glenn L. Martin established his company in Middle River to be able to work on seaplanes.  You don't hear much about those anymore, but they could take off and land on the water.  The final seaplane project of the company was a jet seaplane that was later cancelled.  On one test flight the pilot flew the plane under the Chesapeake Bay Bridge, which caused somewhat of an uproar.</p><p>Is this Glenn Martin related to Glenn L. Martin?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The story is about a Glenn Martin of New Zealand.Many years ago , I worked at the Glenn L. Martin Company in Middle River , Maryland , just outside Baltimore .
That company later became part of Martin-Marietta and was merged into Lockheed-Martin.Glenn L. Martin established his company in Middle River to be able to work on seaplanes .
You do n't hear much about those anymore , but they could take off and land on the water .
The final seaplane project of the company was a jet seaplane that was later cancelled .
On one test flight the pilot flew the plane under the Chesapeake Bay Bridge , which caused somewhat of an uproar.Is this Glenn Martin related to Glenn L. Martin ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The story is about a Glenn Martin of New Zealand.Many years ago, I worked at the Glenn L. Martin Company in Middle River, Maryland, just outside Baltimore.
That company later became part of Martin-Marietta and was merged into Lockheed-Martin.Glenn L. Martin established his company in Middle River to be able to work on seaplanes.
You don't hear much about those anymore, but they could take off and land on the water.
The final seaplane project of the company was a jet seaplane that was later cancelled.
On one test flight the pilot flew the plane under the Chesapeake Bay Bridge, which caused somewhat of an uproar.Is this Glenn Martin related to Glenn L. Martin?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422218</id>
	<title>Re:nah</title>
	<author>timeOday</author>
	<datestamp>1268147880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Those hydrogen-peroxide packs are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell\_Rocket\_Belt" title="wikipedia.org">old news</a> [wikipedia.org]; the main problem is they can only fly for about 30 seconds.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those hydrogen-peroxide packs are old news [ wikipedia.org ] ; the main problem is they can only fly for about 30 seconds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those hydrogen-peroxide packs are old news [wikipedia.org]; the main problem is they can only fly for about 30 seconds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421922</id>
	<title>Question?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268145000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>In any 'jetpack' video--from any company--all we've seen so far is a guy no higher than 6' doing less than 10mph. This vehicle would be useless if that's all it could do. So, if these things can do 60mph+ and fly at an altitude of 8000ft+, where's the video? Wouldn't a potential customer be more willing to drop $60,000+ before the thing is even produced if we saw that?</htmltext>
<tokenext>In any 'jetpack ' video--from any company--all we 've seen so far is a guy no higher than 6 ' doing less than 10mph .
This vehicle would be useless if that 's all it could do .
So , if these things can do 60mph + and fly at an altitude of 8000ft + , where 's the video ?
Would n't a potential customer be more willing to drop $ 60,000 + before the thing is even produced if we saw that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In any 'jetpack' video--from any company--all we've seen so far is a guy no higher than 6' doing less than 10mph.
This vehicle would be useless if that's all it could do.
So, if these things can do 60mph+ and fly at an altitude of 8000ft+, where's the video?
Wouldn't a potential customer be more willing to drop $60,000+ before the thing is even produced if we saw that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422340</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>countertrolling</author>
	<datestamp>1268149440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>A sky full of unregulated idiots is even more scary.</i></p><p>As long as they're not incontinent...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A sky full of unregulated idiots is even more scary.As long as they 're not incontinent.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A sky full of unregulated idiots is even more scary.As long as they're not incontinent...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423854</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268211780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Where's my god damned flying car?!!</p></div><p>I know you must mean this is jest, but...</p><p>

The limiting factor in flying cars (and in sure in this jet-pack thingy) is <i>the pilot.</i>  People can hardly keep their shit together in a regular car.  Folks don't even use their parking break, can't drive a standard, can't use turn signals, drive around drunk or stoned...  it's just not feasible for the average dork-in-the-street. Sending them airborne is not going to help.</p><p>

That being said, amateur pilots have their problems too.  My Dad, a mechanical engineer, was an avid amateur pilot.  He built himself a gyrocopter, also known as an autogyro. (See Mad Max 2) He never had any severe problems.  However, metal eventually fatigues, and engines eventually quit, no matter the maintenance schedule.  He did do a number of emergency landings, which are relatively easy in a gyrocopter, especially considering he'd always fly over sod farms.</p><p>

However, my family have attended many funerals for my Dad's flying buddies.  These were not stupid guys.  They were competent, educated, level headed, and sober-minded.  Most were of them were of the engineering persuasion.  That doesn't me they can't make mistakes.  Some of these mistakes, or gross mechanical failure, cost these guys their lives. </p><p>

Amongst the reasons why my Dad survived his piloting days was that he was grounded due to an unrelated medical problem. </p><p>

We'll build the flying car when we built the flying car pilot.  Look not to the stars.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where 's my god damned flying car ? !
! I know you must mean this is jest , but.. . The limiting factor in flying cars ( and in sure in this jet-pack thingy ) is the pilot .
People can hardly keep their shit together in a regular car .
Folks do n't even use their parking break , ca n't drive a standard , ca n't use turn signals , drive around drunk or stoned... it 's just not feasible for the average dork-in-the-street .
Sending them airborne is not going to help .
That being said , amateur pilots have their problems too .
My Dad , a mechanical engineer , was an avid amateur pilot .
He built himself a gyrocopter , also known as an autogyro .
( See Mad Max 2 ) He never had any severe problems .
However , metal eventually fatigues , and engines eventually quit , no matter the maintenance schedule .
He did do a number of emergency landings , which are relatively easy in a gyrocopter , especially considering he 'd always fly over sod farms .
However , my family have attended many funerals for my Dad 's flying buddies .
These were not stupid guys .
They were competent , educated , level headed , and sober-minded .
Most were of them were of the engineering persuasion .
That does n't me they ca n't make mistakes .
Some of these mistakes , or gross mechanical failure , cost these guys their lives .
Amongst the reasons why my Dad survived his piloting days was that he was grounded due to an unrelated medical problem .
We 'll build the flying car when we built the flying car pilot .
Look not to the stars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where's my god damned flying car?!
!I know you must mean this is jest, but...

The limiting factor in flying cars (and in sure in this jet-pack thingy) is the pilot.
People can hardly keep their shit together in a regular car.
Folks don't even use their parking break, can't drive a standard, can't use turn signals, drive around drunk or stoned...  it's just not feasible for the average dork-in-the-street.
Sending them airborne is not going to help.
That being said, amateur pilots have their problems too.
My Dad, a mechanical engineer, was an avid amateur pilot.
He built himself a gyrocopter, also known as an autogyro.
(See Mad Max 2) He never had any severe problems.
However, metal eventually fatigues, and engines eventually quit, no matter the maintenance schedule.
He did do a number of emergency landings, which are relatively easy in a gyrocopter, especially considering he'd always fly over sod farms.
However, my family have attended many funerals for my Dad's flying buddies.
These were not stupid guys.
They were competent, educated, level headed, and sober-minded.
Most were of them were of the engineering persuasion.
That doesn't me they can't make mistakes.
Some of these mistakes, or gross mechanical failure, cost these guys their lives.
Amongst the reasons why my Dad survived his piloting days was that he was grounded due to an unrelated medical problem.
We'll build the flying car when we built the flying car pilot.
Look not to the stars.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424244</id>
	<title>That's all very well and good...</title>
	<author>ghmh</author>
	<datestamp>1268217120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>.. but what I want to know is: does it blend?</htmltext>
<tokenext>.. but what I want to know is : does it blend ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. but what I want to know is: does it blend?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421734</id>
	<title>Just like in Linux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268143320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>a bunch of cock smoking fags like to use linux and take it up their ass.</htmltext>
<tokenext>a bunch of cock smoking fags like to use linux and take it up their ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a bunch of cock smoking fags like to use linux and take it up their ass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31457200</id>
	<title>redundancy</title>
	<author>JumpSocial</author>
	<datestamp>1268390940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's pretty cool but it should have redundant engines. Engine failure is inevitable and it'll cause injury.

They have ducted fan helicopters in Avatar (James Cameron's recent movie). That's similar to this except the Avatar copters had tail rotors and a vertical stabilizer. I suspect that it's a bad design choice since ducted fans it may not auto-gyro.

For the jet pack, I don't think there are many applications for it aside from just screwing.

But perhaps a cool discovery gets made while developing that stuff.

Maybe they could cook up a VTO (vertical takeoff and landing) ultralight that has a wing and can also fly using the wing.

I saw the comments about using flying things in place of cars. One huge issue is that cars already use too much energy. Thing that fly are even more demanding for energy. So where things stand now, I doubt airplanes will replace cars for a long while. Things that fly will be better for stuff like the airlines and military are already doing for a while but not to replace cars.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's pretty cool but it should have redundant engines .
Engine failure is inevitable and it 'll cause injury .
They have ducted fan helicopters in Avatar ( James Cameron 's recent movie ) .
That 's similar to this except the Avatar copters had tail rotors and a vertical stabilizer .
I suspect that it 's a bad design choice since ducted fans it may not auto-gyro .
For the jet pack , I do n't think there are many applications for it aside from just screwing .
But perhaps a cool discovery gets made while developing that stuff .
Maybe they could cook up a VTO ( vertical takeoff and landing ) ultralight that has a wing and can also fly using the wing .
I saw the comments about using flying things in place of cars .
One huge issue is that cars already use too much energy .
Thing that fly are even more demanding for energy .
So where things stand now , I doubt airplanes will replace cars for a long while .
Things that fly will be better for stuff like the airlines and military are already doing for a while but not to replace cars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's pretty cool but it should have redundant engines.
Engine failure is inevitable and it'll cause injury.
They have ducted fan helicopters in Avatar (James Cameron's recent movie).
That's similar to this except the Avatar copters had tail rotors and a vertical stabilizer.
I suspect that it's a bad design choice since ducted fans it may not auto-gyro.
For the jet pack, I don't think there are many applications for it aside from just screwing.
But perhaps a cool discovery gets made while developing that stuff.
Maybe they could cook up a VTO (vertical takeoff and landing) ultralight that has a wing and can also fly using the wing.
I saw the comments about using flying things in place of cars.
One huge issue is that cars already use too much energy.
Thing that fly are even more demanding for energy.
So where things stand now, I doubt airplanes will replace cars for a long while.
Things that fly will be better for stuff like the airlines and military are already doing for a while but not to replace cars.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31425942</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>Caue</author>
	<datestamp>1268235720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>tell that to all the people who ever got stomped by a scared crowd. remember, people move away of danger, regardless of the consequences. a building fire, a rock concert gone wrong and a soccer stadium in england or brazil may prove your theory very, so very wrong.</htmltext>
<tokenext>tell that to all the people who ever got stomped by a scared crowd .
remember , people move away of danger , regardless of the consequences .
a building fire , a rock concert gone wrong and a soccer stadium in england or brazil may prove your theory very , so very wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>tell that to all the people who ever got stomped by a scared crowd.
remember, people move away of danger, regardless of the consequences.
a building fire, a rock concert gone wrong and a soccer stadium in england or brazil may prove your theory very, so very wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424070</id>
	<title>Not a jetpack</title>
	<author>Chris Mattern</author>
	<datestamp>1268214840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How can you call it a jetpack when it doesn't have any jets?  More of a ducted-fan pack.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How can you call it a jetpack when it does n't have any jets ?
More of a ducted-fan pack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can you call it a jetpack when it doesn't have any jets?
More of a ducted-fan pack.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423368</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>joe\_frisch</author>
	<datestamp>1268160480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Light aircraft are considerably more dangerous than cars per mile flown. Around 1 fatality / 100,000 hours (or 1 per 15 million passenger miles). Cars are about 1/200 million passenger miles (NTSB statistics).</p><p>I don't see any reason to thing the jet pack would be safer than a general aviation aircraft, and it would probably be a lot more dangerous.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Light aircraft are considerably more dangerous than cars per mile flown .
Around 1 fatality / 100,000 hours ( or 1 per 15 million passenger miles ) .
Cars are about 1/200 million passenger miles ( NTSB statistics ) .I do n't see any reason to thing the jet pack would be safer than a general aviation aircraft , and it would probably be a lot more dangerous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Light aircraft are considerably more dangerous than cars per mile flown.
Around 1 fatality / 100,000 hours (or 1 per 15 million passenger miles).
Cars are about 1/200 million passenger miles (NTSB statistics).I don't see any reason to thing the jet pack would be safer than a general aviation aircraft, and it would probably be a lot more dangerous.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423266</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>tlhIngan</author>
	<datestamp>1268158680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Not really. Flying, when done properly will be -a lot- more safe than driving. With flying, unlike driving you go not just left and right but also up and down. Mix this with the fact that there are no roads (meaning to get to the same place two people can easily take routes miles apart) and you have the ability to reduce, eliminate traffic problems that exist in traditional traffic.</p><p>Also, never underestimate the fact of self-preservation, when encountered in a life threatening situation, people tend to do the right thing and move away from danger. People are self-regulating when it comes to life and death.</p></div></blockquote><p>Never underestimate the idiot. The only good thing at the moment is that the people using this will be rich, and probably can afford lessons and proper flying technique.</p><p>Once it becomes cheap, people will jump in, get a few lessons , and then on their second flight start talking/texting on their cellphones.</p><p>The only good thing is the Big Sky Theory works quite well, except during lowlevel flight and people start smacking into buildings. Unfortunately, time "to do the right ting" might not be present to avoid flying into that brick wall.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not really .
Flying , when done properly will be -a lot- more safe than driving .
With flying , unlike driving you go not just left and right but also up and down .
Mix this with the fact that there are no roads ( meaning to get to the same place two people can easily take routes miles apart ) and you have the ability to reduce , eliminate traffic problems that exist in traditional traffic.Also , never underestimate the fact of self-preservation , when encountered in a life threatening situation , people tend to do the right thing and move away from danger .
People are self-regulating when it comes to life and death.Never underestimate the idiot .
The only good thing at the moment is that the people using this will be rich , and probably can afford lessons and proper flying technique.Once it becomes cheap , people will jump in , get a few lessons , and then on their second flight start talking/texting on their cellphones.The only good thing is the Big Sky Theory works quite well , except during lowlevel flight and people start smacking into buildings .
Unfortunately , time " to do the right ting " might not be present to avoid flying into that brick wall .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not really.
Flying, when done properly will be -a lot- more safe than driving.
With flying, unlike driving you go not just left and right but also up and down.
Mix this with the fact that there are no roads (meaning to get to the same place two people can easily take routes miles apart) and you have the ability to reduce, eliminate traffic problems that exist in traditional traffic.Also, never underestimate the fact of self-preservation, when encountered in a life threatening situation, people tend to do the right thing and move away from danger.
People are self-regulating when it comes to life and death.Never underestimate the idiot.
The only good thing at the moment is that the people using this will be rich, and probably can afford lessons and proper flying technique.Once it becomes cheap, people will jump in, get a few lessons , and then on their second flight start talking/texting on their cellphones.The only good thing is the Big Sky Theory works quite well, except during lowlevel flight and people start smacking into buildings.
Unfortunately, time "to do the right ting" might not be present to avoid flying into that brick wall.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424496</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>Darkman, Walkin Dude</author>
	<datestamp>1268221260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It could be feasable if you treat the roads like multi-tier highways. Have say three or four "levels" above the surface, with cars automated to go to those levels for road driving. If tier 1 is slow, go to 2, and so on, with simple collision detection sensors to slow them down in case they get too close to each other. You could line each side of the road with beacons as well to keep the cars within the "tracks", or just use GPS and switch to "road mode". Keeping a maximum height for the whole affair of say 100 meters should be plenty, how many roads have 100m of anything above them? You wouldn't even need to adjust existing infrastructure much. Licensing could be varied, with the lowest level only entitled to drive on main roads on autopilot, basically punch in location A to location B and sit back, while higher level grades could offer greater autonomy, with the top level being equivalent to a commercial pilot's licence.<br> <br>The benefits would be massive, you could clear up traffic problems overnight, multiplying the capacity of your road network by four or more, you could have a seperate commercial delivery network running drop pods everywhere, it would transform civilisation as we know it.<br> <br>
Now all we need is an electric car/hovercar, roadworthy for bad weather.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It could be feasable if you treat the roads like multi-tier highways .
Have say three or four " levels " above the surface , with cars automated to go to those levels for road driving .
If tier 1 is slow , go to 2 , and so on , with simple collision detection sensors to slow them down in case they get too close to each other .
You could line each side of the road with beacons as well to keep the cars within the " tracks " , or just use GPS and switch to " road mode " .
Keeping a maximum height for the whole affair of say 100 meters should be plenty , how many roads have 100m of anything above them ?
You would n't even need to adjust existing infrastructure much .
Licensing could be varied , with the lowest level only entitled to drive on main roads on autopilot , basically punch in location A to location B and sit back , while higher level grades could offer greater autonomy , with the top level being equivalent to a commercial pilot 's licence .
The benefits would be massive , you could clear up traffic problems overnight , multiplying the capacity of your road network by four or more , you could have a seperate commercial delivery network running drop pods everywhere , it would transform civilisation as we know it .
Now all we need is an electric car/hovercar , roadworthy for bad weather .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It could be feasable if you treat the roads like multi-tier highways.
Have say three or four "levels" above the surface, with cars automated to go to those levels for road driving.
If tier 1 is slow, go to 2, and so on, with simple collision detection sensors to slow them down in case they get too close to each other.
You could line each side of the road with beacons as well to keep the cars within the "tracks", or just use GPS and switch to "road mode".
Keeping a maximum height for the whole affair of say 100 meters should be plenty, how many roads have 100m of anything above them?
You wouldn't even need to adjust existing infrastructure much.
Licensing could be varied, with the lowest level only entitled to drive on main roads on autopilot, basically punch in location A to location B and sit back, while higher level grades could offer greater autonomy, with the top level being equivalent to a commercial pilot's licence.
The benefits would be massive, you could clear up traffic problems overnight, multiplying the capacity of your road network by four or more, you could have a seperate commercial delivery network running drop pods everywhere, it would transform civilisation as we know it.
Now all we need is an electric car/hovercar, roadworthy for bad weather.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422524</id>
	<title>Rocket Man</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268151060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think I prefer the rocketman jet pack: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-oQ--U-WaQ</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think I prefer the rocketman jet pack : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = P-oQ--U-WaQ</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think I prefer the rocketman jet pack: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-oQ--U-WaQ</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31426136</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>tehcyder</author>
	<datestamp>1268236620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Also, never underestimate the fact of self-preservation, when encountered in a life threatening situation, people tend to do the right thing and move away from danger. People are self-regulating when it comes to life and death.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
And that's why there are so few serious road traffic accidents.
<br>
<br>
No, wait...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , never underestimate the fact of self-preservation , when encountered in a life threatening situation , people tend to do the right thing and move away from danger .
People are self-regulating when it comes to life and death .
And that 's why there are so few serious road traffic accidents .
No , wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, never underestimate the fact of self-preservation, when encountered in a life threatening situation, people tend to do the right thing and move away from danger.
People are self-regulating when it comes to life and death.
And that's why there are so few serious road traffic accidents.
No, wait...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538</id>
	<title>That's fine but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268141700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where's my god damned flying car?!!</p><p>/ Also Duke Nukem Forever.  Still waiting here...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where 's my god damned flying car ? !
! / Also Duke Nukem Forever .
Still waiting here.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where's my god damned flying car?!
!/ Also Duke Nukem Forever.
Still waiting here...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422734</id>
	<title>Just a Kiwi knock off of a Solotrek</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268152860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know this is likely to result in a Troll but I lived in New Zealand for a while and what I found was it was amazing how many things Kiwis were first in they just did it a couple of years after the other guy. An example was a Kiwi pilot who is considered by Kiwis the first person to ever have a controlled flight he just did it a few years after the Wright Brothers. This is being pitched as something original when it's just like a Solotrek. The US company ran out of funding and given the inherent danger it's doubtful they would have ever released a commercial product. They mention using a parachute for safety. That doesn't make much sense given it would mostly operate in what is known as the kill zone, kind of between 30'-200'. Below that you might survive the fall and above that parachutes work. In that zone it's tough to get a parachute to work. They have to be explosively deployed and testing can be harder than testing the flying machine itself. These devices are more like an ultralight with really bad fuel economy that can take off vertically. They've been around for years in various forms and always have extremely short ranges and are extremely dangerous. Saying they are a "pack" is a bit of a stretch. You may be strapped into it but I've never seen one of these light enough to carry around and they all have stands on the bottom. The actual jetpacks are more compact and lighter and can be carried around for very short distances but their range is even worse than these Solotrek style machines. The fantasy of walking out front of your house and flying to work has been around since the 50s and is likely to be a fantasy for another 50 years. It'll always be dangerous and until some one comes up with a more energy dense form of fuel they will always have very short ranges. Spend a few grand on an electric bike if you want a personal high tech way to get to work. Personal flight is called an airplane or a helicopter. Even if some one pulls it off it'll never be cheap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know this is likely to result in a Troll but I lived in New Zealand for a while and what I found was it was amazing how many things Kiwis were first in they just did it a couple of years after the other guy .
An example was a Kiwi pilot who is considered by Kiwis the first person to ever have a controlled flight he just did it a few years after the Wright Brothers .
This is being pitched as something original when it 's just like a Solotrek .
The US company ran out of funding and given the inherent danger it 's doubtful they would have ever released a commercial product .
They mention using a parachute for safety .
That does n't make much sense given it would mostly operate in what is known as the kill zone , kind of between 30'-200' .
Below that you might survive the fall and above that parachutes work .
In that zone it 's tough to get a parachute to work .
They have to be explosively deployed and testing can be harder than testing the flying machine itself .
These devices are more like an ultralight with really bad fuel economy that can take off vertically .
They 've been around for years in various forms and always have extremely short ranges and are extremely dangerous .
Saying they are a " pack " is a bit of a stretch .
You may be strapped into it but I 've never seen one of these light enough to carry around and they all have stands on the bottom .
The actual jetpacks are more compact and lighter and can be carried around for very short distances but their range is even worse than these Solotrek style machines .
The fantasy of walking out front of your house and flying to work has been around since the 50s and is likely to be a fantasy for another 50 years .
It 'll always be dangerous and until some one comes up with a more energy dense form of fuel they will always have very short ranges .
Spend a few grand on an electric bike if you want a personal high tech way to get to work .
Personal flight is called an airplane or a helicopter .
Even if some one pulls it off it 'll never be cheap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know this is likely to result in a Troll but I lived in New Zealand for a while and what I found was it was amazing how many things Kiwis were first in they just did it a couple of years after the other guy.
An example was a Kiwi pilot who is considered by Kiwis the first person to ever have a controlled flight he just did it a few years after the Wright Brothers.
This is being pitched as something original when it's just like a Solotrek.
The US company ran out of funding and given the inherent danger it's doubtful they would have ever released a commercial product.
They mention using a parachute for safety.
That doesn't make much sense given it would mostly operate in what is known as the kill zone, kind of between 30'-200'.
Below that you might survive the fall and above that parachutes work.
In that zone it's tough to get a parachute to work.
They have to be explosively deployed and testing can be harder than testing the flying machine itself.
These devices are more like an ultralight with really bad fuel economy that can take off vertically.
They've been around for years in various forms and always have extremely short ranges and are extremely dangerous.
Saying they are a "pack" is a bit of a stretch.
You may be strapped into it but I've never seen one of these light enough to carry around and they all have stands on the bottom.
The actual jetpacks are more compact and lighter and can be carried around for very short distances but their range is even worse than these Solotrek style machines.
The fantasy of walking out front of your house and flying to work has been around since the 50s and is likely to be a fantasy for another 50 years.
It'll always be dangerous and until some one comes up with a more energy dense form of fuel they will always have very short ranges.
Spend a few grand on an electric bike if you want a personal high tech way to get to work.
Personal flight is called an airplane or a helicopter.
Even if some one pulls it off it'll never be cheap.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424350</id>
	<title>Re:Not a proper jetpack!</title>
	<author>osu-neko</author>
	<datestamp>1268219340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...and ENIAC wasn't a computer because it didn't fit on your desk, right?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and ENIAC was n't a computer because it did n't fit on your desk , right ?
: p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and ENIAC wasn't a computer because it didn't fit on your desk, right?
:p</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423166</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>show me altoids</author>
	<datestamp>1268157600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wind and weather are going to be huge problems.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wind and weather are going to be huge problems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wind and weather are going to be huge problems.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424528</id>
	<title>deja vu</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268221920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, the design is almost identical to the one they tried to build on Mythbusters.  For being a couple SFX geeks those guys get thier shit pretty close to together.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , the design is almost identical to the one they tried to build on Mythbusters .
For being a couple SFX geeks those guys get thier shit pretty close to together .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, the design is almost identical to the one they tried to build on Mythbusters.
For being a couple SFX geeks those guys get thier shit pretty close to together.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422746</id>
	<title>This one is cooler</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268152980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This one is cooler

<a href="http://www.thebigmoney.com/blogs/shifting-gears/2010/03/05/learn-fly-jetpack-yes-jetpack" title="thebigmoney.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thebigmoney.com/blogs/shifting-gears/2010/03/05/learn-fly-jetpack-yes-jetpack</a> [thebigmoney.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>This one is cooler http : //www.thebigmoney.com/blogs/shifting-gears/2010/03/05/learn-fly-jetpack-yes-jetpack [ thebigmoney.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This one is cooler

http://www.thebigmoney.com/blogs/shifting-gears/2010/03/05/learn-fly-jetpack-yes-jetpack [thebigmoney.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424308</id>
	<title>Don't know ...</title>
	<author>jandersen</author>
	<datestamp>1268218260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>While Arthur C. Clarke's geosync satellites have taken to space, and James Bond's futuristic mobile technology has become commonplace</p></div><p>Arthur Clarke was a clever guy, and geostationary satelites are kind of obvious, really. And one of the main reasons why James Bond tech is now common is that their occurance in the Bond movies was part of a carefully planned marketing strategy.</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... still the dream of sustained personal flight has eluded us -- until now. At $86,000, the Martin Aircraft jetpack costs about as much as a high-end car, achieves a 30-minute flight time, and is fueled by regular gasoline. A 10\% deposit buys you a production slot for 12 months hence."</p></div><p>I don't think this one is going to get off the ground. Personal flight is the kind of thing you may like to dream about, but I suspect most wouldn't enjoy actually doing it - otherwise the sky would be full of hang-gliders, day and night. On top of that, $86k for 30 minutes of lumbering along uncomfortably under some stinking and noisy contraption hardly seems attractive, unless you want to show off that you are rich enough to not care that you look a right twit. And of course, there is the question of CO2 and responsibility; very soon no one will admire somebody who feels that he can piss the environment up and down - which is just one of the reasons that the Hummer is not being produced any more.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>While Arthur C. Clarke 's geosync satellites have taken to space , and James Bond 's futuristic mobile technology has become commonplaceArthur Clarke was a clever guy , and geostationary satelites are kind of obvious , really .
And one of the main reasons why James Bond tech is now common is that their occurance in the Bond movies was part of a carefully planned marketing strategy .
... still the dream of sustained personal flight has eluded us -- until now .
At $ 86,000 , the Martin Aircraft jetpack costs about as much as a high-end car , achieves a 30-minute flight time , and is fueled by regular gasoline .
A 10 \ % deposit buys you a production slot for 12 months hence .
" I do n't think this one is going to get off the ground .
Personal flight is the kind of thing you may like to dream about , but I suspect most would n't enjoy actually doing it - otherwise the sky would be full of hang-gliders , day and night .
On top of that , $ 86k for 30 minutes of lumbering along uncomfortably under some stinking and noisy contraption hardly seems attractive , unless you want to show off that you are rich enough to not care that you look a right twit .
And of course , there is the question of CO2 and responsibility ; very soon no one will admire somebody who feels that he can piss the environment up and down - which is just one of the reasons that the Hummer is not being produced any more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While Arthur C. Clarke's geosync satellites have taken to space, and James Bond's futuristic mobile technology has become commonplaceArthur Clarke was a clever guy, and geostationary satelites are kind of obvious, really.
And one of the main reasons why James Bond tech is now common is that their occurance in the Bond movies was part of a carefully planned marketing strategy.
... still the dream of sustained personal flight has eluded us -- until now.
At $86,000, the Martin Aircraft jetpack costs about as much as a high-end car, achieves a 30-minute flight time, and is fueled by regular gasoline.
A 10\% deposit buys you a production slot for 12 months hence.
"I don't think this one is going to get off the ground.
Personal flight is the kind of thing you may like to dream about, but I suspect most wouldn't enjoy actually doing it - otherwise the sky would be full of hang-gliders, day and night.
On top of that, $86k for 30 minutes of lumbering along uncomfortably under some stinking and noisy contraption hardly seems attractive, unless you want to show off that you are rich enough to not care that you look a right twit.
And of course, there is the question of CO2 and responsibility; very soon no one will admire somebody who feels that he can piss the environment up and down - which is just one of the reasons that the Hummer is not being produced any more.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31428594</id>
	<title>Re:Don't know ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268247780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Arthur Clarke was a clever guy, and geostationary satelites are kind of obvious, really.</p><p>Inventors are fond of pointing out that "obvious" patents are never said to be obvious before the patent application is filed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Arthur Clarke was a clever guy , and geostationary satelites are kind of obvious , really.Inventors are fond of pointing out that " obvious " patents are never said to be obvious before the patent application is filed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Arthur Clarke was a clever guy, and geostationary satelites are kind of obvious, really.Inventors are fond of pointing out that "obvious" patents are never said to be obvious before the patent application is filed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421754</id>
	<title>The future is here!</title>
	<author>glwtta</author>
	<datestamp>1268143500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, it's massive, ridiculously expensive, and useless?<br> <br>Why, this thing could replace the Segway as the most popular mode of transportation!</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , it 's massive , ridiculously expensive , and useless ?
Why , this thing could replace the Segway as the most popular mode of transportation !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, it's massive, ridiculously expensive, and useless?
Why, this thing could replace the Segway as the most popular mode of transportation!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422172</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268147280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Coming soon to MTV: "PIMP My Jetpack!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Coming soon to MTV : " PIMP My Jetpack !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Coming soon to MTV: "PIMP My Jetpack!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423080</id>
	<title>Re:Not a jetpack</title>
	<author>marciot</author>
	<datestamp>1268156520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, if it uses fans rather than jets, it is not a jetpack, it is a...</p><p>*drum roll*</p><p>fanny pack</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , if it uses fans rather than jets , it is not a jetpack , it is a... * drum roll * fanny pack</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, if it uses fans rather than jets, it is not a jetpack, it is a...*drum roll*fanny pack</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423586</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>GooberToo</author>
	<datestamp>1268251680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Light aircraft are considerably more dangerous than cars per mile flown.</p></div><p>Most argue that's a poor statistic to compare for aviation but that's not the primary reason I'm responding. GA, on average, is as dangerous as riding a motorcycle. Keep in mind this includes even the most dangerous categories of general aviation. Realistically, statistically, once you exclude things like acrobatics, you're almost as safe as riding in a car (between motorcycles and cars). If you excluding stupid pilot tricks like flying into IMC (bad weather) without an instrument ticket, lack of currency, lack of flight planning, etc, you're actually slightly safer than riding in a car. If you exclude poorly maintained aircraft, which is common with low end rentals, your safety improves yet again.</p><p>Realistically, as long as you are a conservative pilot, and especially if you own your own plane (assuming that means its well maintained), you're far safer flying in a plane than riding on the roads. And if you fly commercially, your safety drastically improves beyond that. But worst case, statistically, if you are willing to ride a motorcycle on the roads, then you shouldn't blink at riding in most any certified aircraft.</p><p>As a side note, contrary to what even most pilots will tell you, statistically, if a pilot flies less than 100-150 hrs/year in a multi-engine aircraft, you are in a more dangerous category than acrobats. So don't even let the dual engine "safety" rhetoric lull you into flying in a twin, thinking its far safer than a single, if the pilot doesn't regularly fly a lot! Twins have very dangerous single engine failure scenarios which can be a big handful in even the most experienced of pilots. And in these failure scenarios, current experience absolutely matters.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Light aircraft are considerably more dangerous than cars per mile flown.Most argue that 's a poor statistic to compare for aviation but that 's not the primary reason I 'm responding .
GA , on average , is as dangerous as riding a motorcycle .
Keep in mind this includes even the most dangerous categories of general aviation .
Realistically , statistically , once you exclude things like acrobatics , you 're almost as safe as riding in a car ( between motorcycles and cars ) .
If you excluding stupid pilot tricks like flying into IMC ( bad weather ) without an instrument ticket , lack of currency , lack of flight planning , etc , you 're actually slightly safer than riding in a car .
If you exclude poorly maintained aircraft , which is common with low end rentals , your safety improves yet again.Realistically , as long as you are a conservative pilot , and especially if you own your own plane ( assuming that means its well maintained ) , you 're far safer flying in a plane than riding on the roads .
And if you fly commercially , your safety drastically improves beyond that .
But worst case , statistically , if you are willing to ride a motorcycle on the roads , then you should n't blink at riding in most any certified aircraft.As a side note , contrary to what even most pilots will tell you , statistically , if a pilot flies less than 100-150 hrs/year in a multi-engine aircraft , you are in a more dangerous category than acrobats .
So do n't even let the dual engine " safety " rhetoric lull you into flying in a twin , thinking its far safer than a single , if the pilot does n't regularly fly a lot !
Twins have very dangerous single engine failure scenarios which can be a big handful in even the most experienced of pilots .
And in these failure scenarios , current experience absolutely matters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Light aircraft are considerably more dangerous than cars per mile flown.Most argue that's a poor statistic to compare for aviation but that's not the primary reason I'm responding.
GA, on average, is as dangerous as riding a motorcycle.
Keep in mind this includes even the most dangerous categories of general aviation.
Realistically, statistically, once you exclude things like acrobatics, you're almost as safe as riding in a car (between motorcycles and cars).
If you excluding stupid pilot tricks like flying into IMC (bad weather) without an instrument ticket, lack of currency, lack of flight planning, etc, you're actually slightly safer than riding in a car.
If you exclude poorly maintained aircraft, which is common with low end rentals, your safety improves yet again.Realistically, as long as you are a conservative pilot, and especially if you own your own plane (assuming that means its well maintained), you're far safer flying in a plane than riding on the roads.
And if you fly commercially, your safety drastically improves beyond that.
But worst case, statistically, if you are willing to ride a motorcycle on the roads, then you shouldn't blink at riding in most any certified aircraft.As a side note, contrary to what even most pilots will tell you, statistically, if a pilot flies less than 100-150 hrs/year in a multi-engine aircraft, you are in a more dangerous category than acrobats.
So don't even let the dual engine "safety" rhetoric lull you into flying in a twin, thinking its far safer than a single, if the pilot doesn't regularly fly a lot!
Twins have very dangerous single engine failure scenarios which can be a big handful in even the most experienced of pilots.
And in these failure scenarios, current experience absolutely matters.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423368</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423572</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>julian\_t</author>
	<datestamp>1268251260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... With flying, unlike driving you go not just left and right but also up and down.
</p></div><p>I'm currently commuting to work through the rush-hour traffic in Mumbai, and I cannot tell you how scary this idea is. The thought of adding a third dimension to Mumbai traffic quite takes my breath away.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>
People are self-regulating when it comes to life and death.</p></div><p>That may be true, but many times a day it isn't the impression I get. Full speed ahead and damn the torpedos doesn't begin to describe it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... With flying , unlike driving you go not just left and right but also up and down .
I 'm currently commuting to work through the rush-hour traffic in Mumbai , and I can not tell you how scary this idea is .
The thought of adding a third dimension to Mumbai traffic quite takes my breath away .
People are self-regulating when it comes to life and death.That may be true , but many times a day it is n't the impression I get .
Full speed ahead and damn the torpedos does n't begin to describe it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... With flying, unlike driving you go not just left and right but also up and down.
I'm currently commuting to work through the rush-hour traffic in Mumbai, and I cannot tell you how scary this idea is.
The thought of adding a third dimension to Mumbai traffic quite takes my breath away.
People are self-regulating when it comes to life and death.That may be true, but many times a day it isn't the impression I get.
Full speed ahead and damn the torpedos doesn't begin to describe it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422908</id>
	<title>thought</title>
	<author>jarden\_from\_cerberus</author>
	<datestamp>1268154480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When are they going to combine this 250lb monster with one of those exoskeletons that let you carry 250lbs with little effort? Talk about a match made in heaven...</htmltext>
<tokenext>When are they going to combine this 250lb monster with one of those exoskeletons that let you carry 250lbs with little effort ?
Talk about a match made in heaven.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When are they going to combine this 250lb monster with one of those exoskeletons that let you carry 250lbs with little effort?
Talk about a match made in heaven...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422302</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268148960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's right here: http://terrafugia.com/ and you can make an escrow deposit on one now for delivery starting 2011.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's right here : http : //terrafugia.com/ and you can make an escrow deposit on one now for delivery starting 2011 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's right here: http://terrafugia.com/ and you can make an escrow deposit on one now for delivery starting 2011.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421744</id>
	<title>Flight of the Conchords!!!</title>
	<author>OzPeter</author>
	<datestamp>1268143380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They really do fly this time!!</p><p>Just listen to the sound track on the training video - even sounds like it was scripted by the show</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They really do fly this time !
! Just listen to the sound track on the training video - even sounds like it was scripted by the show</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They really do fly this time!
!Just listen to the sound track on the training video - even sounds like it was scripted by the show</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424912</id>
	<title>Re:This is nothing but a very early prototype.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268228520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You really need this man, http://tinyurl.com/ykv2mnw . People that post without watching videos or doing any research should be beat with a google link till there're eyes are black.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You really need this man , http : //tinyurl.com/ykv2mnw .
People that post without watching videos or doing any research should be beat with a google link till there 're eyes are black .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You really need this man, http://tinyurl.com/ykv2mnw .
People that post without watching videos or doing any research should be beat with a google link till there're eyes are black.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423070</id>
	<title>Re:Short Ranged</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268156460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those 30 miles could take two hours to cover in a car during commute times. Longer if there's accidents. There's also the time-saving advantages of flying in a straight line. In good weather I can see some high level managers buying these and taking them to work instead of driving their BMWs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those 30 miles could take two hours to cover in a car during commute times .
Longer if there 's accidents .
There 's also the time-saving advantages of flying in a straight line .
In good weather I can see some high level managers buying these and taking them to work instead of driving their BMWs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those 30 miles could take two hours to cover in a car during commute times.
Longer if there's accidents.
There's also the time-saving advantages of flying in a straight line.
In good weather I can see some high level managers buying these and taking them to work instead of driving their BMWs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421842</id>
	<title>hovercraft is better</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268144400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the jetpack was such a moneysink, this hovercraft is cooler.<br><a href="http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Strange-News/Flying-Hovercraft-Inventor-New-Zealand-Mechanic-Rudy-Heeman-Auctions-WIG-Vehicle/Article/201003115563210?lpos=Strange\_News\_First\_Home\_Page\_Feature\_Teaser\_Region\_0&amp;lid=ARTICLE\_15563210\_Flying\_Hovercraft\%3A\_Inventor\%2C\_New\_Zealand\_Mechanic\_Rudy\_Heeman\%2C\_Auctions\_WIG\_Vehicle" title="sky.com" rel="nofollow">http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Strange-News/Flying-Hovercraft-Inventor-New-Zealand-Mechanic-Rudy-Heeman-Auctions-WIG-Vehicle/Article/201003115563210?lpos=Strange\_News\_First\_Home\_Page\_Feature\_Teaser\_Region\_0&amp;lid=ARTICLE\_15563210\_Flying\_Hovercraft\%3A\_Inventor\%2C\_New\_Zealand\_Mechanic\_Rudy\_Heeman\%2C\_Auctions\_WIG\_Vehicle</a> [sky.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the jetpack was such a moneysink , this hovercraft is cooler.http : //news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Strange-News/Flying-Hovercraft-Inventor-New-Zealand-Mechanic-Rudy-Heeman-Auctions-WIG-Vehicle/Article/201003115563210 ? lpos = Strange \ _News \ _First \ _Home \ _Page \ _Feature \ _Teaser \ _Region \ _0&amp;lid = ARTICLE \ _15563210 \ _Flying \ _Hovercraft \ % 3A \ _Inventor \ % 2C \ _New \ _Zealand \ _Mechanic \ _Rudy \ _Heeman \ % 2C \ _Auctions \ _WIG \ _Vehicle [ sky.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the jetpack was such a moneysink, this hovercraft is cooler.http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Strange-News/Flying-Hovercraft-Inventor-New-Zealand-Mechanic-Rudy-Heeman-Auctions-WIG-Vehicle/Article/201003115563210?lpos=Strange\_News\_First\_Home\_Page\_Feature\_Teaser\_Region\_0&amp;lid=ARTICLE\_15563210\_Flying\_Hovercraft\%3A\_Inventor\%2C\_New\_Zealand\_Mechanic\_Rudy\_Heeman\%2C\_Auctions\_WIG\_Vehicle [sky.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421720</id>
	<title>nah</title>
	<author>JackSpratts</author>
	<datestamp>1268143260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>that's not a rocket pack.

this is a rocket pack. self-taught guy's been building them for years:

<a href="http://www.motherboard.tv/2010/2/26/jetpacks-this-mexican-inventor-s-been-making-them-for-years--2" title="motherboard.tv">http://www.motherboard.tv/2010/2/26/jetpacks-this-mexican-inventor-s-been-making-them-for-years--2</a> [motherboard.tv]</htmltext>
<tokenext>that 's not a rocket pack .
this is a rocket pack .
self-taught guy 's been building them for years : http : //www.motherboard.tv/2010/2/26/jetpacks-this-mexican-inventor-s-been-making-them-for-years--2 [ motherboard.tv ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that's not a rocket pack.
this is a rocket pack.
self-taught guy's been building them for years:

http://www.motherboard.tv/2010/2/26/jetpacks-this-mexican-inventor-s-been-making-them-for-years--2 [motherboard.tv]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422352</id>
	<title>Re:nah</title>
	<author>Spykk</author>
	<datestamp>1268149500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, <i>this</i> is a knoife! Wait, what were we talking about?</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , this is a knoife !
Wait , what were we talking about ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, this is a knoife!
Wait, what were we talking about?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31434260</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>RockDoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1268239380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Also, never underestimate the fact of self-preservation,</p></div> </blockquote><p>Which 100\% of people fail at during 100\% of any two consecutive centuries you care to choose.</p><blockquote><div><p>when encountered in a life threatening situation, people tend to do the right thing and move away from danger.</p></div></blockquote><p>Sure they are, and sure they do. The fuck do people "do the right thing" in a life-threatening situation ; they tend to either continue doing what they were doing 20 minutes ago (because they fail to recognise or deny that they are in a life-threatening situation), or they run in circles, scream and shout.</p><p>There is a fucking good reason that people who make a living of going into life-threatening situations do lots and lots of drill : "people" (in the sense of, run-of-the-mill, bog-standard, people) are fucking dangerous to themselves and to other people in dangerous situation, because most people don't have the foggiest fucking idea of what the fuck to do.</p><blockquote><div><p>People are self-regulating when it comes to life and death.</p></div></blockquote><p>Too true : enough of them die, and there is no more of that gene-collection ; meanwhile, the people who have taken the "I'll be elsewhere" response to risk are just out-breeding the brave fools all over the place.</p><p>Which planet were you living on this week, and how did you get into this universe?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , never underestimate the fact of self-preservation , Which 100 \ % of people fail at during 100 \ % of any two consecutive centuries you care to choose.when encountered in a life threatening situation , people tend to do the right thing and move away from danger.Sure they are , and sure they do .
The fuck do people " do the right thing " in a life-threatening situation ; they tend to either continue doing what they were doing 20 minutes ago ( because they fail to recognise or deny that they are in a life-threatening situation ) , or they run in circles , scream and shout.There is a fucking good reason that people who make a living of going into life-threatening situations do lots and lots of drill : " people " ( in the sense of , run-of-the-mill , bog-standard , people ) are fucking dangerous to themselves and to other people in dangerous situation , because most people do n't have the foggiest fucking idea of what the fuck to do.People are self-regulating when it comes to life and death.Too true : enough of them die , and there is no more of that gene-collection ; meanwhile , the people who have taken the " I 'll be elsewhere " response to risk are just out-breeding the brave fools all over the place.Which planet were you living on this week , and how did you get into this universe ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, never underestimate the fact of self-preservation, Which 100\% of people fail at during 100\% of any two consecutive centuries you care to choose.when encountered in a life threatening situation, people tend to do the right thing and move away from danger.Sure they are, and sure they do.
The fuck do people "do the right thing" in a life-threatening situation ; they tend to either continue doing what they were doing 20 minutes ago (because they fail to recognise or deny that they are in a life-threatening situation), or they run in circles, scream and shout.There is a fucking good reason that people who make a living of going into life-threatening situations do lots and lots of drill : "people" (in the sense of, run-of-the-mill, bog-standard, people) are fucking dangerous to themselves and to other people in dangerous situation, because most people don't have the foggiest fucking idea of what the fuck to do.People are self-regulating when it comes to life and death.Too true : enough of them die, and there is no more of that gene-collection ; meanwhile, the people who have taken the "I'll be elsewhere" response to risk are just out-breeding the brave fools all over the place.Which planet were you living on this week, and how did you get into this universe?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31427012</id>
	<title>How many other people...</title>
	<author>mafian911</author>
	<datestamp>1268240340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... were thinking of that scene from Iron Man at the end of the video. In the moment he was hovering, getting ready to land, I was kinda hoping he'd say "Kill power." and go crashing through the floor.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... were thinking of that scene from Iron Man at the end of the video .
In the moment he was hovering , getting ready to land , I was kinda hoping he 'd say " Kill power .
" and go crashing through the floor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... were thinking of that scene from Iron Man at the end of the video.
In the moment he was hovering, getting ready to land, I was kinda hoping he'd say "Kill power.
" and go crashing through the floor.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421950</id>
	<title>http://www.mychristianlouboutinshoes.com/</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268145300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's seems a joke.!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's seems a joke .
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's seems a joke.
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422096</id>
	<title>How loud is it?</title>
	<author>Mr\_Blank</author>
	<datestamp>1268146320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> Having my head 1 meter from a 100+ decibel turbo props for 30 minutes at a time does not sound like a good idea.  Crashing in the equivalent of a flying motorcycle (human body moving fast on a structure required to hold a combustion engine) does not sound good for my health either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having my head 1 meter from a 100 + decibel turbo props for 30 minutes at a time does not sound like a good idea .
Crashing in the equivalent of a flying motorcycle ( human body moving fast on a structure required to hold a combustion engine ) does not sound good for my health either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Having my head 1 meter from a 100+ decibel turbo props for 30 minutes at a time does not sound like a good idea.
Crashing in the equivalent of a flying motorcycle (human body moving fast on a structure required to hold a combustion engine) does not sound good for my health either.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424082</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>wye43</author>
	<datestamp>1268214900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...
Also, never underestimate the fact of self-preservation, when encountered in a life threatening situation, people tend to do the right thing and move away from danger. People are self-regulating when it comes to life and death.</p></div><p>And in this spirit, ladies and gentleducks, we proudly present you the 2010 <a href="http://www.darwinawards.com/" title="darwinawards.com" rel="nofollow">darwin awards</a> [darwinawards.com].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>.. . Also , never underestimate the fact of self-preservation , when encountered in a life threatening situation , people tend to do the right thing and move away from danger .
People are self-regulating when it comes to life and death.And in this spirit , ladies and gentleducks , we proudly present you the 2010 darwin awards [ darwinawards.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...
Also, never underestimate the fact of self-preservation, when encountered in a life threatening situation, people tend to do the right thing and move away from danger.
People are self-regulating when it comes to life and death.And in this spirit, ladies and gentleducks, we proudly present you the 2010 darwin awards [darwinawards.com].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424750</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>g253</author>
	<datestamp>1268226120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Also, never underestimate the fact of self-preservation, when encountered in a life threatening situation, people tend to do the right thing and move away from danger. People are self-regulating when it comes to life and death.</p></div><p>

I doubt that very much. When faced with an imminent and life threatening potential car crash, people don't usually swerve or accelerate to try and avoid it, they completely panic and slam their breaks as hard as they can.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , never underestimate the fact of self-preservation , when encountered in a life threatening situation , people tend to do the right thing and move away from danger .
People are self-regulating when it comes to life and death .
I doubt that very much .
When faced with an imminent and life threatening potential car crash , people do n't usually swerve or accelerate to try and avoid it , they completely panic and slam their breaks as hard as they can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, never underestimate the fact of self-preservation, when encountered in a life threatening situation, people tend to do the right thing and move away from danger.
People are self-regulating when it comes to life and death.
I doubt that very much.
When faced with an imminent and life threatening potential car crash, people don't usually swerve or accelerate to try and avoid it, they completely panic and slam their breaks as hard as they can.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423440</id>
	<title>even better than jetlev</title>
	<author>Polo</author>
	<datestamp>1268162040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wow, that's the second one I've seen this week...</p><p>The jetlev seems a little less intimidating though:</p><p><a href="http://jetlev.com/" title="jetlev.com">http://jetlev.com/</a> [jetlev.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wow , that 's the second one I 've seen this week...The jetlev seems a little less intimidating though : http : //jetlev.com/ [ jetlev.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wow, that's the second one I've seen this week...The jetlev seems a little less intimidating though:http://jetlev.com/ [jetlev.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422558</id>
	<title>Huge</title>
	<author>aldld</author>
	<datestamp>1268151300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But it's freaking huge! I don't think I could even fit that through the door to my house.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But it 's freaking huge !
I do n't think I could even fit that through the door to my house .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it's freaking huge!
I don't think I could even fit that through the door to my house.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421808</id>
	<title>Repossession</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268144040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The payments on $86K are going to be a bitch. I can't wait for jetpacks to start appearing on Operation Repo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The payments on $ 86K are going to be a bitch .
I ca n't wait for jetpacks to start appearing on Operation Repo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The payments on $86K are going to be a bitch.
I can't wait for jetpacks to start appearing on Operation Repo.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422194</id>
	<title>avoid the "touring" package</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268147580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This package adds $10K to the price, but only provides frilly extras such as a tape deck that plays "Meet the Jetsons" in a loop while the rider is airborne.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This package adds $ 10K to the price , but only provides frilly extras such as a tape deck that plays " Meet the Jetsons " in a loop while the rider is airborne .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This package adds $10K to the price, but only provides frilly extras such as a tape deck that plays "Meet the Jetsons" in a loop while the rider is airborne.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422292</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>Asclepius99</author>
	<datestamp>1268148900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You'll get Duke Nukem Forever when you strap in a pig onto one of those.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'll get Duke Nukem Forever when you strap in a pig onto one of those .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'll get Duke Nukem Forever when you strap in a pig onto one of those.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422324</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>bertoelcon</author>
	<datestamp>1268149200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>With flying, unlike driving you go not just left and right but also up and down..</p></div><p>Not the way I drive.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>With flying , unlike driving you go not just left and right but also up and down..Not the way I drive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With flying, unlike driving you go not just left and right but also up and down..Not the way I drive.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421988</id>
	<title>Not a proper jetpack!</title>
	<author>Dun Malg</author>
	<datestamp>1268145540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>This design does not meet the basic definition of a proper science fiction jetpack. Specifically, you cannot walk around with it on your back, then decide "you know, I think I'll fly over that wall" and then WHOOOOOOSH! over the wall you go. This thing is obviously too big and heavy to tote around on your back. Heck, I don't even really see the point of harnessing to it with straps--- you'd be better off with a seat, maybe with and instrument panel, and perhaps a windscreen, because if you can't carry the thing on your back, what does it matter?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This design does not meet the basic definition of a proper science fiction jetpack .
Specifically , you can not walk around with it on your back , then decide " you know , I think I 'll fly over that wall " and then WHOOOOOOSH !
over the wall you go .
This thing is obviously too big and heavy to tote around on your back .
Heck , I do n't even really see the point of harnessing to it with straps--- you 'd be better off with a seat , maybe with and instrument panel , and perhaps a windscreen , because if you ca n't carry the thing on your back , what does it matter ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This design does not meet the basic definition of a proper science fiction jetpack.
Specifically, you cannot walk around with it on your back, then decide "you know, I think I'll fly over that wall" and then WHOOOOOOSH!
over the wall you go.
This thing is obviously too big and heavy to tote around on your back.
Heck, I don't even really see the point of harnessing to it with straps--- you'd be better off with a seat, maybe with and instrument panel, and perhaps a windscreen, because if you can't carry the thing on your back, what does it matter?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422138</id>
	<title>Re:A motorcycle for flying</title>
	<author>timlash</author>
	<datestamp>1268146920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This would be a perfect application for an aircraft recovery parachute.

<a href="http://www.brsparachutes.com/" title="brsparachutes.com">http://www.brsparachutes.com/</a> [brsparachutes.com]

Too bad Steve Fossett didn't have one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This would be a perfect application for an aircraft recovery parachute .
http : //www.brsparachutes.com/ [ brsparachutes.com ] Too bad Steve Fossett did n't have one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would be a perfect application for an aircraft recovery parachute.
http://www.brsparachutes.com/ [brsparachutes.com]

Too bad Steve Fossett didn't have one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423728</id>
	<title>Do I smell ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268253540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do I smell a whiff of not invented in the USA, so it can't be good or clever?</p><p>Good luck to both the company and their customers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do I smell a whiff of not invented in the USA , so it ca n't be good or clever ? Good luck to both the company and their customers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do I smell a whiff of not invented in the USA, so it can't be good or clever?Good luck to both the company and their customers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422436</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>Ethanol-fueled</author>
	<datestamp>1268150220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Which is a good point, what happens to all the road-ragers who take to the skies and transfer their angry unsafe operation to the skies? It'll be a whole new meaning to "flipping the bird*"!<br> <br>

* <i>Because birds fly. Man, I'm so writing that one down for later.</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which is a good point , what happens to all the road-ragers who take to the skies and transfer their angry unsafe operation to the skies ?
It 'll be a whole new meaning to " flipping the bird * " !
* Because birds fly .
Man , I 'm so writing that one down for later .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which is a good point, what happens to all the road-ragers who take to the skies and transfer their angry unsafe operation to the skies?
It'll be a whole new meaning to "flipping the bird*"!
* Because birds fly.
Man, I'm so writing that one down for later.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31427398</id>
	<title>Better than a jetpack:</title>
	<author>2obvious4u</author>
	<datestamp>1268242020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4U6T\_BB1N8" title="youtube.com">The best way to fly!</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The best way to fly !
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The best way to fly!
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31425938</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268235720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article says the craft is being built to Ultralight spect (Part 104 I think). Basically no equipment regs, just stay out of certain airspace.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article says the craft is being built to Ultralight spect ( Part 104 I think ) .
Basically no equipment regs , just stay out of certain airspace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article says the craft is being built to Ultralight spect (Part 104 I think).
Basically no equipment regs, just stay out of certain airspace.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421768</id>
	<title>Not a jetpack</title>
	<author>sneakyimp</author>
	<datestamp>1268143620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I belive driven not by jet engines, but by a ducted van.  *not* a jetpack!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I belive driven not by jet engines , but by a ducted van .
* not * a jetpack !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I belive driven not by jet engines, but by a ducted van.
*not* a jetpack!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31426278</id>
	<title>Correction...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268237220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That should read Flying Jet with Meat Pack.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That should read Flying Jet with Meat Pack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That should read Flying Jet with Meat Pack.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422876</id>
	<title>Re:Not a proper jetpack!</title>
	<author>Strange Ranger</author>
	<datestamp>1268154240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"does not meet the basic definition of a proper science fiction jetpack.... if you can't carry the thing on your back, what does it matter?"</i> <br> <br>
Without things like this, the "proper science fiction jetpack" will never exist.  <br>Without any hype, these inventions can't happen.<br> <br>
It's a disappointment to see so many nay-saying posts come from this community.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" does not meet the basic definition of a proper science fiction jetpack.... if you ca n't carry the thing on your back , what does it matter ?
" Without things like this , the " proper science fiction jetpack " will never exist .
Without any hype , these inventions ca n't happen .
It 's a disappointment to see so many nay-saying posts come from this community .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"does not meet the basic definition of a proper science fiction jetpack.... if you can't carry the thing on your back, what does it matter?
"  
Without things like this, the "proper science fiction jetpack" will never exist.
Without any hype, these inventions can't happen.
It's a disappointment to see so many nay-saying posts come from this community.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422142</id>
	<title>Re:Not a proper jetpack!</title>
	<author>earlymon</author>
	<datestamp>1268146980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Heck, I don't even really see the point of harnessing to it with straps--- you'd be better off with a seat, maybe with and instrument panel, and perhaps a windscreen, because if you can't carry the thing on your back, what does it matter?</p></div><p>Might as well add wheels to move it about while on ground - and maybe a way to retract them; and then add a bit more fuel capacity for all of the trouble.  At its heart is a V-4 engine - might as well upgrade that.</p><p>While we're at it, we could even toss on wings and a tail.....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Heck , I do n't even really see the point of harnessing to it with straps--- you 'd be better off with a seat , maybe with and instrument panel , and perhaps a windscreen , because if you ca n't carry the thing on your back , what does it matter ? Might as well add wheels to move it about while on ground - and maybe a way to retract them ; and then add a bit more fuel capacity for all of the trouble .
At its heart is a V-4 engine - might as well upgrade that.While we 're at it , we could even toss on wings and a tail.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heck, I don't even really see the point of harnessing to it with straps--- you'd be better off with a seat, maybe with and instrument panel, and perhaps a windscreen, because if you can't carry the thing on your back, what does it matter?Might as well add wheels to move it about while on ground - and maybe a way to retract them; and then add a bit more fuel capacity for all of the trouble.
At its heart is a V-4 engine - might as well upgrade that.While we're at it, we could even toss on wings and a tail.....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422608</id>
	<title>Re:That's fine but...</title>
	<author>wjsteele</author>
	<datestamp>1268151780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your flying car is over at <a href="http://www.terrafugia.com/" title="terrafugia.com">Terrafugia</a> [terrafugia.com].<br> <br>

Bill</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your flying car is over at Terrafugia [ terrafugia.com ] .
Bill</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your flying car is over at Terrafugia [terrafugia.com].
Bill</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423166
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31425938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31434260
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422340
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31428594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422352
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31438338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422336
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31426136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31425942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31425778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31438556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31426732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31428694
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_10_0020201_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422876
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_0020201.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424912
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_0020201.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422746
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_0020201.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422204
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31438556
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_0020201.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422352
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421900
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_0020201.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422908
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_0020201.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421786
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422336
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422226
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424750
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423266
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31434260
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423572
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423166
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423368
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423586
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31426732
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31426136
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31428694
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31425942
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422888
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31425778
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31425938
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422324
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422436
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422626
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31438338
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424082
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423342
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424496
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424076
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422302
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_0020201.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423080
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422152
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_0020201.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421916
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_0020201.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421760
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_0020201.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31430770
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_0020201.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423070
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_0020201.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31428594
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_0020201.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422734
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_0020201.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424070
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_0020201.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422268
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_0020201.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422058
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_0020201.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423440
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_0020201.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421808
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_0020201.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31424350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422876
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_0020201.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31421896
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31422138
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_10_0020201.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_10_0020201.31423614
</commentlist>
</conversation>
