<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_08_1524235</id>
	<title>Disposable Toilet To Change the World</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1268077140000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>captn ecks writes <i>"A biodegradable and self-sterilizing bag for people of the toilet-disenfranchised world (40\% of humankind) to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/02/science/02bag.html">dispose of their bodily waste and turn it into safe fertilizer</a> has been created by a Swedish entrepreneur. It's a dead simple and brilliant solution to a vexing problem. From the article: 'Once used, the bag can be knotted and buried, and a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer, killing off disease-producing pathogens found in feces. The bag, called the Peepoo, is the brainchild of Anders Wilhelmson, an architect and professor in Stockholm. &ldquo;Not only is it sanitary,&rdquo; said Mr. Wilhelmson, who has patented the bag, &ldquo;they can reuse this to grow crops.&rdquo;'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>captn ecks writes " A biodegradable and self-sterilizing bag for people of the toilet-disenfranchised world ( 40 \ % of humankind ) to dispose of their bodily waste and turn it into safe fertilizer has been created by a Swedish entrepreneur .
It 's a dead simple and brilliant solution to a vexing problem .
From the article : 'Once used , the bag can be knotted and buried , and a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer , killing off disease-producing pathogens found in feces .
The bag , called the Peepoo , is the brainchild of Anders Wilhelmson , an architect and professor in Stockholm .
   Not only is it sanitary ,    said Mr. Wilhelmson , who has patented the bag ,    they can reuse this to grow crops.    ' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>captn ecks writes "A biodegradable and self-sterilizing bag for people of the toilet-disenfranchised world (40\% of humankind) to dispose of their bodily waste and turn it into safe fertilizer has been created by a Swedish entrepreneur.
It's a dead simple and brilliant solution to a vexing problem.
From the article: 'Once used, the bag can be knotted and buried, and a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer, killing off disease-producing pathogens found in feces.
The bag, called the Peepoo, is the brainchild of Anders Wilhelmson, an architect and professor in Stockholm.
“Not only is it sanitary,” said Mr. Wilhelmson, who has patented the bag, “they can reuse this to grow crops.”'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404964</id>
	<title>Obligatory South Park Quote</title>
	<author>jayveekay</author>
	<datestamp>1268041260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Mom, bathroom!" [Cartman, during a days long WoW leveling grind]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Mom , bathroom !
" [ Cartman , during a days long WoW leveling grind ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Mom, bathroom!
" [Cartman, during a days long WoW leveling grind]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404610</id>
	<title>I immediately thought...</title>
	<author>ItsJustAPseudonym</author>
	<datestamp>1268039460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...of a really disgusting version of haggis.<br>

Yes. MORE disgusting haggis!</htmltext>
<tokenext>...of a really disgusting version of haggis .
Yes. MORE disgusting haggis !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...of a really disgusting version of haggis.
Yes. MORE disgusting haggis!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409908</id>
	<title>Needs a catcher name than Wilhemson</title>
	<author>Buddy the WIld Geek</author>
	<datestamp>1268070060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I mean, the invention of the indoor toilet was named (I think) Thomas Crapper.  We need something catchier.  PeePoo doesn't seem to do it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , the invention of the indoor toilet was named ( I think ) Thomas Crapper .
We need something catchier .
PeePoo does n't seem to do it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, the invention of the indoor toilet was named (I think) Thomas Crapper.
We need something catchier.
PeePoo doesn't seem to do it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404648</id>
	<title>Shit provides both food and fuel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268039640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>e.g.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search\_query=methane+digester" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/results?search\_query=methane+digester</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>You get methane which can be burned as fuel and the digestate is high in nitrogen, phosphorus and calcium.</p><p>Alternatively, lower tech without the gas tight fittings, drop the methane capture idea and use a dry toilet. It's more a matter of education and organisation than anything else.</p><p>I'll just point out that by not doing this in the west, we are effectively extracting phosphorus, nitrogen and calcium from our fields and pumping it into rivers and oceans. We then burn a load of fuel to dig up more phosphorus and calcium elsewhere and burn natural gas to produce nitrates to put back on the fields. It's dumb.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>e.g.http : //www.youtube.com/results ? search \ _query = methane + digester [ youtube.com ] You get methane which can be burned as fuel and the digestate is high in nitrogen , phosphorus and calcium.Alternatively , lower tech without the gas tight fittings , drop the methane capture idea and use a dry toilet .
It 's more a matter of education and organisation than anything else.I 'll just point out that by not doing this in the west , we are effectively extracting phosphorus , nitrogen and calcium from our fields and pumping it into rivers and oceans .
We then burn a load of fuel to dig up more phosphorus and calcium elsewhere and burn natural gas to produce nitrates to put back on the fields .
It 's dumb .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>e.g.http://www.youtube.com/results?search\_query=methane+digester [youtube.com]You get methane which can be burned as fuel and the digestate is high in nitrogen, phosphorus and calcium.Alternatively, lower tech without the gas tight fittings, drop the methane capture idea and use a dry toilet.
It's more a matter of education and organisation than anything else.I'll just point out that by not doing this in the west, we are effectively extracting phosphorus, nitrogen and calcium from our fields and pumping it into rivers and oceans.
We then burn a load of fuel to dig up more phosphorus and calcium elsewhere and burn natural gas to produce nitrates to put back on the fields.
It's dumb.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404710</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system</title>
	<author>md65536</author>
	<datestamp>1268039940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>why doesn't Kenya and all these other 3rd world countries build a real sewer system?</p></div><p>Way to wait till someone invents a simple solution, to come up with an even simpler solution!</p><p>Also... I heard that a lot of people don't even have bread to eat.  Why don't they just eat cake?</p><p>"Why don't they just" is a good solution to having the poor pull themselves up out of poverty by their bootstraps, but there are a lot of interrelated problems keeping them down, that need to be solved first (or simultaneously) in order to allow building infrastructure to pay off.  It's worth trying to tackle, I think, but I also think that a few thousand dollars worth of bags that turn disease-producing waste into fertilizer would go a LOT further than the same money spent on heavy diesel equipment.</p><p>Also keep in mind that much of rural north america isn't fit with a sewer system, and if it's not feasible here it certainly isn't in rural parts of the third world.  A sewer system isn't a solution for all parts of the world.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>why does n't Kenya and all these other 3rd world countries build a real sewer system ? Way to wait till someone invents a simple solution , to come up with an even simpler solution ! Also... I heard that a lot of people do n't even have bread to eat .
Why do n't they just eat cake ?
" Why do n't they just " is a good solution to having the poor pull themselves up out of poverty by their bootstraps , but there are a lot of interrelated problems keeping them down , that need to be solved first ( or simultaneously ) in order to allow building infrastructure to pay off .
It 's worth trying to tackle , I think , but I also think that a few thousand dollars worth of bags that turn disease-producing waste into fertilizer would go a LOT further than the same money spent on heavy diesel equipment.Also keep in mind that much of rural north america is n't fit with a sewer system , and if it 's not feasible here it certainly is n't in rural parts of the third world .
A sewer system is n't a solution for all parts of the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why doesn't Kenya and all these other 3rd world countries build a real sewer system?Way to wait till someone invents a simple solution, to come up with an even simpler solution!Also... I heard that a lot of people don't even have bread to eat.
Why don't they just eat cake?
"Why don't they just" is a good solution to having the poor pull themselves up out of poverty by their bootstraps, but there are a lot of interrelated problems keeping them down, that need to be solved first (or simultaneously) in order to allow building infrastructure to pay off.
It's worth trying to tackle, I think, but I also think that a few thousand dollars worth of bags that turn disease-producing waste into fertilizer would go a LOT further than the same money spent on heavy diesel equipment.Also keep in mind that much of rural north america isn't fit with a sewer system, and if it's not feasible here it certainly isn't in rural parts of the third world.
A sewer system isn't a solution for all parts of the world.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405852</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1268045100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Romans had similar-worse literacy rates too so it isn't education. But they had water or coal power available to a larger percentage of the population. They had more roads than many of the poorest countries today. People within rome starved less. That was more likely due to the fact that they taxed every country around them.

<br> <br>I think in the end it has to do with culture, good governance and trade.

<br> <br>Rome made much of its money through trade. Currently since africa et al are at the bottom of the food chain they have no bargaining chips WTO then allows rich countries to fuck them over. This is a really big deal. If the WTO weren't pretty much evil we would see a big change in africa fairly rapidly. Corruption would be rampant but it would be in a position where that could change.

<br> <br>The government in rome was corrupt. BUT it was stable. And it was smart. When you are running an empire and want to hold onto that position you have to be smart. When you run a shithole it doesn't matter if you are smart or not. The government in rome passed laws to keep farmers from starving to death which seems sensible. Doubt that would happen in many african countries.

<br> <br>Lastly culture, Rome was a place of thinkers. Sure many of the leaders didn't like the senate or the philosophers, even executed them on occasion. But they were answerable to them to some degree. And it was a culture that cared for innovation to be certain. Power was shown through marvels such as the aquaducts. Power in africa is shown through slaughtering a village. Which isn't as productive. They had slaves and yet people were more equal then compared to present day shitholes...<br> <br>Really though the main problem is probably stability, 2nd would be trade. Kinda sad when you think of all the political overthrowing that the US and others have done. Would have been better to leave a dictator in that kills a bunch of political enemies than to repeatedly destabilize the country. Yes, I realize how horrible that sounds. But in the case of a countries like Iraq... or Lebanon or Iran (assassination) or Libya (bombing) it has proven to not help at all. And certainly not served to lower the death toll. In some countries (iran, n. korea, lebanon(israeli pov)) I think working to reduce stability is done purposefully to keep 'enemies' from becoming stable enough to be a threat.<br> <br>

If you want to fix 3rd world countries then you have to support (not undermine) the rule of law EVEN if you disagree with it. Isn't that what sovreignty is all about? Do w/e increases stability. From there OPEN trade! Talk to them. Have conditions... ones that they can actually meet. Free trade if you give up sharia law or some such is meaningless talk. Follow through with agreements (don't repeat what happened screwing over north korea). Small things like... hold elections without assassinating political opponents and we'll drop tarrifs 5\%. Lower tarrifs to countries that get litteracy over 35\%. So on. I doubt greed would allow this to happen, lattes and big screen tvs outrank lives when they are many km away. But that is what it takes to get sewage systems, not just rocks sadly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Romans had similar-worse literacy rates too so it is n't education .
But they had water or coal power available to a larger percentage of the population .
They had more roads than many of the poorest countries today .
People within rome starved less .
That was more likely due to the fact that they taxed every country around them .
I think in the end it has to do with culture , good governance and trade .
Rome made much of its money through trade .
Currently since africa et al are at the bottom of the food chain they have no bargaining chips WTO then allows rich countries to fuck them over .
This is a really big deal .
If the WTO were n't pretty much evil we would see a big change in africa fairly rapidly .
Corruption would be rampant but it would be in a position where that could change .
The government in rome was corrupt .
BUT it was stable .
And it was smart .
When you are running an empire and want to hold onto that position you have to be smart .
When you run a shithole it does n't matter if you are smart or not .
The government in rome passed laws to keep farmers from starving to death which seems sensible .
Doubt that would happen in many african countries .
Lastly culture , Rome was a place of thinkers .
Sure many of the leaders did n't like the senate or the philosophers , even executed them on occasion .
But they were answerable to them to some degree .
And it was a culture that cared for innovation to be certain .
Power was shown through marvels such as the aquaducts .
Power in africa is shown through slaughtering a village .
Which is n't as productive .
They had slaves and yet people were more equal then compared to present day shitholes... Really though the main problem is probably stability , 2nd would be trade .
Kinda sad when you think of all the political overthrowing that the US and others have done .
Would have been better to leave a dictator in that kills a bunch of political enemies than to repeatedly destabilize the country .
Yes , I realize how horrible that sounds .
But in the case of a countries like Iraq... or Lebanon or Iran ( assassination ) or Libya ( bombing ) it has proven to not help at all .
And certainly not served to lower the death toll .
In some countries ( iran , n. korea , lebanon ( israeli pov ) ) I think working to reduce stability is done purposefully to keep 'enemies ' from becoming stable enough to be a threat .
If you want to fix 3rd world countries then you have to support ( not undermine ) the rule of law EVEN if you disagree with it .
Is n't that what sovreignty is all about ?
Do w/e increases stability .
From there OPEN trade !
Talk to them .
Have conditions... ones that they can actually meet .
Free trade if you give up sharia law or some such is meaningless talk .
Follow through with agreements ( do n't repeat what happened screwing over north korea ) .
Small things like... hold elections without assassinating political opponents and we 'll drop tarrifs 5 \ % .
Lower tarrifs to countries that get litteracy over 35 \ % .
So on .
I doubt greed would allow this to happen , lattes and big screen tvs outrank lives when they are many km away .
But that is what it takes to get sewage systems , not just rocks sadly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Romans had similar-worse literacy rates too so it isn't education.
But they had water or coal power available to a larger percentage of the population.
They had more roads than many of the poorest countries today.
People within rome starved less.
That was more likely due to the fact that they taxed every country around them.
I think in the end it has to do with culture, good governance and trade.
Rome made much of its money through trade.
Currently since africa et al are at the bottom of the food chain they have no bargaining chips WTO then allows rich countries to fuck them over.
This is a really big deal.
If the WTO weren't pretty much evil we would see a big change in africa fairly rapidly.
Corruption would be rampant but it would be in a position where that could change.
The government in rome was corrupt.
BUT it was stable.
And it was smart.
When you are running an empire and want to hold onto that position you have to be smart.
When you run a shithole it doesn't matter if you are smart or not.
The government in rome passed laws to keep farmers from starving to death which seems sensible.
Doubt that would happen in many african countries.
Lastly culture, Rome was a place of thinkers.
Sure many of the leaders didn't like the senate or the philosophers, even executed them on occasion.
But they were answerable to them to some degree.
And it was a culture that cared for innovation to be certain.
Power was shown through marvels such as the aquaducts.
Power in africa is shown through slaughtering a village.
Which isn't as productive.
They had slaves and yet people were more equal then compared to present day shitholes... Really though the main problem is probably stability, 2nd would be trade.
Kinda sad when you think of all the political overthrowing that the US and others have done.
Would have been better to leave a dictator in that kills a bunch of political enemies than to repeatedly destabilize the country.
Yes, I realize how horrible that sounds.
But in the case of a countries like Iraq... or Lebanon or Iran (assassination) or Libya (bombing) it has proven to not help at all.
And certainly not served to lower the death toll.
In some countries (iran, n. korea, lebanon(israeli pov)) I think working to reduce stability is done purposefully to keep 'enemies' from becoming stable enough to be a threat.
If you want to fix 3rd world countries then you have to support (not undermine) the rule of law EVEN if you disagree with it.
Isn't that what sovreignty is all about?
Do w/e increases stability.
From there OPEN trade!
Talk to them.
Have conditions... ones that they can actually meet.
Free trade if you give up sharia law or some such is meaningless talk.
Follow through with agreements (don't repeat what happened screwing over north korea).
Small things like... hold elections without assassinating political opponents and we'll drop tarrifs 5\%.
Lower tarrifs to countries that get litteracy over 35\%.
So on.
I doubt greed would allow this to happen, lattes and big screen tvs outrank lives when they are many km away.
But that is what it takes to get sewage systems, not just rocks sadly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404630</id>
	<title>Re:Yes but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268039580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, sure, you could, but you'll activate the flux capacitor about 2 mph before that so it is a mute point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , sure , you could , but you 'll activate the flux capacitor about 2 mph before that so it is a mute point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, sure, you could, but you'll activate the flux capacitor about 2 mph before that so it is a mute point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407852</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>emilper</author>
	<datestamp>1268053140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Relax, it's just Slashdot slowly composting into a clone of TED. Let them eat cake, indeed.</p><p>It's not about "poor peasants", but about urban slums, who would not be able to grow food anyway for lack of space to plant the crops on.</p><p>From the fine article:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Once used, the bag can be knotted and buried, and a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer, killing off disease-producing pathogens found in feces.</p></div><p>Urea would do wonders for the taste of the ground water, and the beautiful bags would make for spectacular "helicopter toilets" (term used in the very fine article).</p><p><div class="quote"><p>But Therese Dooley, senior adviser on sanitation and hygiene for Unicef, said that inculcating sanitation habits was no easy task.</p></div><p>How about using some of the money spent on making sure poor stupid people don't do drugs, have sex before marriage or cross borders without permission, and build sewers ?</p><p>Reading this kind of neo-Victorian crap on Slashdot does make me feel old<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... in the days of yore there were flame wars about filesystems, *BSD vs. Linux or Perl vs. Python, while the poor peasants were perfectly able to compost their own feces without help from sanitation advocacy groups. Now the poor peasants are in need of shit bags, and this is news for nerds, stuff that really matters.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Relax , it 's just Slashdot slowly composting into a clone of TED .
Let them eat cake , indeed.It 's not about " poor peasants " , but about urban slums , who would not be able to grow food anyway for lack of space to plant the crops on.From the fine article : Once used , the bag can be knotted and buried , and a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer , killing off disease-producing pathogens found in feces.Urea would do wonders for the taste of the ground water , and the beautiful bags would make for spectacular " helicopter toilets " ( term used in the very fine article ) .But Therese Dooley , senior adviser on sanitation and hygiene for Unicef , said that inculcating sanitation habits was no easy task.How about using some of the money spent on making sure poor stupid people do n't do drugs , have sex before marriage or cross borders without permission , and build sewers ? Reading this kind of neo-Victorian crap on Slashdot does make me feel old ... in the days of yore there were flame wars about filesystems , * BSD vs. Linux or Perl vs. Python , while the poor peasants were perfectly able to compost their own feces without help from sanitation advocacy groups .
Now the poor peasants are in need of shit bags , and this is news for nerds , stuff that really matters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Relax, it's just Slashdot slowly composting into a clone of TED.
Let them eat cake, indeed.It's not about "poor peasants", but about urban slums, who would not be able to grow food anyway for lack of space to plant the crops on.From the fine article:Once used, the bag can be knotted and buried, and a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer, killing off disease-producing pathogens found in feces.Urea would do wonders for the taste of the ground water, and the beautiful bags would make for spectacular "helicopter toilets" (term used in the very fine article).But Therese Dooley, senior adviser on sanitation and hygiene for Unicef, said that inculcating sanitation habits was no easy task.How about using some of the money spent on making sure poor stupid people don't do drugs, have sex before marriage or cross borders without permission, and build sewers ?Reading this kind of neo-Victorian crap on Slashdot does make me feel old ... in the days of yore there were flame wars about filesystems, *BSD vs. Linux or Perl vs. Python, while the poor peasants were perfectly able to compost their own feces without help from sanitation advocacy groups.
Now the poor peasants are in need of shit bags, and this is news for nerds, stuff that really matters.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404720</id>
	<title>Re:Don't they even own a shovel?</title>
	<author>Zerth</author>
	<datestamp>1268040000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I think you missed the part where it said ". .<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer, killing off disease-producing pathogens found in feces." The difference between shitting in a hole and burying this bag of shit in a hole is that the latter is not only sanitary, but it also helps crops grow.</p></div></blockquote><p>So they just need to piss on top of it?</p><p>Or get their dogs to do so, as canines produce higher concentrations of urea than humans.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you missed the part where it said " .
. .a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer , killing off disease-producing pathogens found in feces .
" The difference between shitting in a hole and burying this bag of shit in a hole is that the latter is not only sanitary , but it also helps crops grow.So they just need to piss on top of it ? Or get their dogs to do so , as canines produce higher concentrations of urea than humans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you missed the part where it said ".
. .a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer, killing off disease-producing pathogens found in feces.
" The difference between shitting in a hole and burying this bag of shit in a hole is that the latter is not only sanitary, but it also helps crops grow.So they just need to piss on top of it?Or get their dogs to do so, as canines produce higher concentrations of urea than humans.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406604</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268047500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Also keep in mind that much of rural north america isn't fit with a sewer system</p></div><p>Good point.</p><p>I live commuting distance from Washington D.C. there is no sewer system in my neighborhood.</p><p>We pump water out of a hole drilled in the ground and put it back into a pit in the yard.</p><p>Call it recycling.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also keep in mind that much of rural north america is n't fit with a sewer systemGood point.I live commuting distance from Washington D.C. there is no sewer system in my neighborhood.We pump water out of a hole drilled in the ground and put it back into a pit in the yard.Call it recycling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also keep in mind that much of rural north america isn't fit with a sewer systemGood point.I live commuting distance from Washington D.C. there is no sewer system in my neighborhood.We pump water out of a hole drilled in the ground and put it back into a pit in the yard.Call it recycling.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404800</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1268040480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The issues generally depend on who is in power. Not all politicians are in it for the betterment of the country, but rather themselves. Building a sewer system and anything else were a whole lot easier when Slave Labour was around, but now a third world country has to follow the first world example and abolish slavery - meaning that you can't simply feed a man and expect him to work 18 hours of the day. The Pyramids weren't built in a day. Nor a week, nor a month nor a year. Great Pharoahs basically spent <i>their entire lives</i> building monuments to themselves. The Colleseum took years to complete with labour in the hundreds of thousands.</p><p>So lets suppose you can get hundreds of thousands of people on board to build a sewer system across your Third world City. How are you going to pay them? Money won't do them much good if there is no food. Where's all the food going? Well you feed the top down to the bottom. Politicians first, then their secretaries, and so on and so forth. By the time it reaches the labour pool there is hardly any remaining. This wasn't an issue thousands of years ago because all the major population centers were built around sectors of lush farmlands. Egypt was the breadbasket for many years because of the Nile. You'll notice they are still doing pretty well, all things considered. They also sent large amounts of their population abroad, in armies, to use the food of other nations. Could you imagine doing that today? Like say Ethiopia forming a military, and sending it to Egypt - what kind of disbalance that would cause?</p><p>The whole "Build a sewer system" is much more complicated than people realize. Yes - you can lay the statement that Romans had running water in times that predate the common era. I can just as easily say that European Colonies did not for over a hundred years. Wheres the Aquaducts?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The issues generally depend on who is in power .
Not all politicians are in it for the betterment of the country , but rather themselves .
Building a sewer system and anything else were a whole lot easier when Slave Labour was around , but now a third world country has to follow the first world example and abolish slavery - meaning that you ca n't simply feed a man and expect him to work 18 hours of the day .
The Pyramids were n't built in a day .
Nor a week , nor a month nor a year .
Great Pharoahs basically spent their entire lives building monuments to themselves .
The Colleseum took years to complete with labour in the hundreds of thousands.So lets suppose you can get hundreds of thousands of people on board to build a sewer system across your Third world City .
How are you going to pay them ?
Money wo n't do them much good if there is no food .
Where 's all the food going ?
Well you feed the top down to the bottom .
Politicians first , then their secretaries , and so on and so forth .
By the time it reaches the labour pool there is hardly any remaining .
This was n't an issue thousands of years ago because all the major population centers were built around sectors of lush farmlands .
Egypt was the breadbasket for many years because of the Nile .
You 'll notice they are still doing pretty well , all things considered .
They also sent large amounts of their population abroad , in armies , to use the food of other nations .
Could you imagine doing that today ?
Like say Ethiopia forming a military , and sending it to Egypt - what kind of disbalance that would cause ? The whole " Build a sewer system " is much more complicated than people realize .
Yes - you can lay the statement that Romans had running water in times that predate the common era .
I can just as easily say that European Colonies did not for over a hundred years .
Wheres the Aquaducts ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The issues generally depend on who is in power.
Not all politicians are in it for the betterment of the country, but rather themselves.
Building a sewer system and anything else were a whole lot easier when Slave Labour was around, but now a third world country has to follow the first world example and abolish slavery - meaning that you can't simply feed a man and expect him to work 18 hours of the day.
The Pyramids weren't built in a day.
Nor a week, nor a month nor a year.
Great Pharoahs basically spent their entire lives building monuments to themselves.
The Colleseum took years to complete with labour in the hundreds of thousands.So lets suppose you can get hundreds of thousands of people on board to build a sewer system across your Third world City.
How are you going to pay them?
Money won't do them much good if there is no food.
Where's all the food going?
Well you feed the top down to the bottom.
Politicians first, then their secretaries, and so on and so forth.
By the time it reaches the labour pool there is hardly any remaining.
This wasn't an issue thousands of years ago because all the major population centers were built around sectors of lush farmlands.
Egypt was the breadbasket for many years because of the Nile.
You'll notice they are still doing pretty well, all things considered.
They also sent large amounts of their population abroad, in armies, to use the food of other nations.
Could you imagine doing that today?
Like say Ethiopia forming a military, and sending it to Egypt - what kind of disbalance that would cause?The whole "Build a sewer system" is much more complicated than people realize.
Yes - you can lay the statement that Romans had running water in times that predate the common era.
I can just as easily say that European Colonies did not for over a hundred years.
Wheres the Aquaducts?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405214</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model?</title>
	<author>guyfawkes-11-5</author>
	<datestamp>1268042400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>some places are determined to be so sensitive that you are required to really "leave no trace" pack it all out with you.

using something along the lines of this:

<a href="http://www.davidlnelson.md/ElCapitan/DefinitionPoopTube.htm" title="davidlnelson.md">http://www.davidlnelson.md/ElCapitan/DefinitionPoopTube.htm</a> [davidlnelson.md]

Big Wall climbers use similar things as well.

Yuppie hikers-- not so much.</htmltext>
<tokenext>some places are determined to be so sensitive that you are required to really " leave no trace " pack it all out with you .
using something along the lines of this : http : //www.davidlnelson.md/ElCapitan/DefinitionPoopTube.htm [ davidlnelson.md ] Big Wall climbers use similar things as well .
Yuppie hikers-- not so much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>some places are determined to be so sensitive that you are required to really "leave no trace" pack it all out with you.
using something along the lines of this:

http://www.davidlnelson.md/ElCapitan/DefinitionPoopTube.htm [davidlnelson.md]

Big Wall climbers use similar things as well.
Yuppie hikers-- not so much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409108</id>
	<title>Re:How about California?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268061780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As further evidence the problem of people pooping and peeing on the fields is a real problem, here in central Europe, they don't allow women with skirts on the 'pick your own' fields. Everyone has to wear trousers.</p><p>Gross when you think about the strawberries you picked last Summer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As further evidence the problem of people pooping and peeing on the fields is a real problem , here in central Europe , they do n't allow women with skirts on the 'pick your own ' fields .
Everyone has to wear trousers.Gross when you think about the strawberries you picked last Summer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As further evidence the problem of people pooping and peeing on the fields is a real problem, here in central Europe, they don't allow women with skirts on the 'pick your own' fields.
Everyone has to wear trousers.Gross when you think about the strawberries you picked last Summer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404238</id>
	<title>Don't they even own a shovel?</title>
	<author>Hitman\_Frost</author>
	<datestamp>1268081280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What stops people digging latrines?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What stops people digging latrines ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What stops people digging latrines?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405966</id>
	<title>Re:Perfect for those really long WoW raids.</title>
	<author>roman\_mir</author>
	<datestamp>1268045520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For some reason I read it 'like a chimp' at first...  then I thought that would be very strange for a chimp, then I got it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For some reason I read it 'like a chimp ' at first... then I thought that would be very strange for a chimp , then I got it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For some reason I read it 'like a chimp' at first...  then I thought that would be very strange for a chimp, then I got it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404824</id>
	<title>Re:When you see it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268040600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've heard of the circle of life, but I think I'd like more than one element to be in it between me and my feces.</p><p>Vegetables -&gt; Me -&gt; Poop ----|<br>^--text--to-satisfy---spam-filter-|</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've heard of the circle of life , but I think I 'd like more than one element to be in it between me and my feces.Vegetables - &gt; Me - &gt; Poop ---- | ^ --text--to-satisfy---spam-filter- |</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've heard of the circle of life, but I think I'd like more than one element to be in it between me and my feces.Vegetables -&gt; Me -&gt; Poop ----|^--text--to-satisfy---spam-filter-|</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405578</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system</title>
	<author>Simulant</author>
	<datestamp>1268043960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...the Romans did it over 2000 years ago...but AFAIK labor shortage isn't a problem in most 3rd world countries, is it?</p></div><p>  You're thinking of slave labor, and yes, there is a slave labor shortage in most countries.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...the Romans did it over 2000 years ago...but AFAIK labor shortage is n't a problem in most 3rd world countries , is it ?
You 're thinking of slave labor , and yes , there is a slave labor shortage in most countries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...the Romans did it over 2000 years ago...but AFAIK labor shortage isn't a problem in most 3rd world countries, is it?
You're thinking of slave labor, and yes, there is a slave labor shortage in most countries.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404140</id>
	<title>PeePoo?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268080860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, Shit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , Shit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, Shit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405082</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>timster</author>
	<datestamp>1268041800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Personally, I think it's bullshit advice to assume that poor countries trying to industrialize now will be successful if they follow the same technological path as the countries that industrialized during the Industrial Revolution.</p><p>Just as an example, you wouldn't suggest that a poor country should develop a copper voice telecom industry like rich countries did, would you?  It's much more effective to build a wireless voice network, since the tech available is so much cheaper now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Personally , I think it 's bullshit advice to assume that poor countries trying to industrialize now will be successful if they follow the same technological path as the countries that industrialized during the Industrial Revolution.Just as an example , you would n't suggest that a poor country should develop a copper voice telecom industry like rich countries did , would you ?
It 's much more effective to build a wireless voice network , since the tech available is so much cheaper now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personally, I think it's bullshit advice to assume that poor countries trying to industrialize now will be successful if they follow the same technological path as the countries that industrialized during the Industrial Revolution.Just as an example, you wouldn't suggest that a poor country should develop a copper voice telecom industry like rich countries did, would you?
It's much more effective to build a wireless voice network, since the tech available is so much cheaper now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31410926</id>
	<title>Re:The Humanure Handbook</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268167740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Note to self: Never, ever, ever eat any food from Joseph Jenkins' garden.</p></div><p>How do you think all the other vegetables are grown ????</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Note to self : Never , ever , ever eat any food from Joseph Jenkins ' garden.How do you think all the other vegetables are grown ? ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Note to self: Never, ever, ever eat any food from Joseph Jenkins' garden.How do you think all the other vegetables are grown ???
?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405324</id>
	<title>Re:cost</title>
	<author>ari\_j</author>
	<datestamp>1268042940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What is the cost of the clean cover material in relation to the cost of these bags?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What is the cost of the clean cover material in relation to the cost of these bags ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is the cost of the clean cover material in relation to the cost of these bags?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406268</id>
	<title>A:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system</title>
	<author>boristdog</author>
	<datestamp>1268046420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A joke about corruption in Latin America vs. Africa:</p><p>An African diplomat was visiting his counterpart in Mexico.  The Mexican diplomat had a 10 room house and a Rolls Royce.<br>The African diplomat says: "How did you afford all this?"<br>The Mexican diplomat points to a nearby highway.  "You see that highway?  I got 10\% of the construction cost."</p><p>Years later the Mexican diplomat visits his African counterpart.  The African diplomat has a 100-room mansion and 10 expensive cars.<br>The Mexican diplomat says: "WOW! How did you afford all this?"<br>The African diplomat points to an empty stretch of countryside.  "You see that highway?  I got 100\% of the construction cost!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A joke about corruption in Latin America vs. Africa : An African diplomat was visiting his counterpart in Mexico .
The Mexican diplomat had a 10 room house and a Rolls Royce.The African diplomat says : " How did you afford all this ?
" The Mexican diplomat points to a nearby highway .
" You see that highway ?
I got 10 \ % of the construction cost .
" Years later the Mexican diplomat visits his African counterpart .
The African diplomat has a 100-room mansion and 10 expensive cars.The Mexican diplomat says : " WOW !
How did you afford all this ?
" The African diplomat points to an empty stretch of countryside .
" You see that highway ?
I got 100 \ % of the construction cost !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A joke about corruption in Latin America vs. Africa:An African diplomat was visiting his counterpart in Mexico.
The Mexican diplomat had a 10 room house and a Rolls Royce.The African diplomat says: "How did you afford all this?
"The Mexican diplomat points to a nearby highway.
"You see that highway?
I got 10\% of the construction cost.
"Years later the Mexican diplomat visits his African counterpart.
The African diplomat has a 100-room mansion and 10 expensive cars.The Mexican diplomat says: "WOW!
How did you afford all this?
"The African diplomat points to an empty stretch of countryside.
"You see that highway?
I got 100\% of the construction cost!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404606</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268039460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This.</p><p>These "solutions" for fixing the third world all suck. It's just a bunch of Bono and Dean Kamen-style feel good bullshit that doesn't actually make a difference. What these people real need is a stable government and economic growth. We already have technology that works great for shitting, making clean water, etc. The only word that a third world advocate needs to know is "industrialize."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This.These " solutions " for fixing the third world all suck .
It 's just a bunch of Bono and Dean Kamen-style feel good bullshit that does n't actually make a difference .
What these people real need is a stable government and economic growth .
We already have technology that works great for shitting , making clean water , etc .
The only word that a third world advocate needs to know is " industrialize .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This.These "solutions" for fixing the third world all suck.
It's just a bunch of Bono and Dean Kamen-style feel good bullshit that doesn't actually make a difference.
What these people real need is a stable government and economic growth.
We already have technology that works great for shitting, making clean water, etc.
The only word that a third world advocate needs to know is "industrialize.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409458</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>dcraid</author>
	<datestamp>1268065020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am not sure about poop, but surely some of these people can't afford a pot to pee in.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am not sure about poop , but surely some of these people ca n't afford a pot to pee in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am not sure about poop, but surely some of these people can't afford a pot to pee in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407972</id>
	<title>Re:When you see it</title>
	<author>QRDeNameland</author>
	<datestamp>1268053740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You'll sh*t bricks!</p></div><p>It provides building materials, too?  Wow!!

</p><p>Power to the Peepoo!!

</p><p>Built like a shit brick shit house.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'll sh * t bricks ! It provides building materials , too ?
Wow ! ! Power to the Peepoo ! !
Built like a shit brick shit house .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'll sh*t bricks!It provides building materials, too?
Wow!!

Power to the Peepoo!!
Built like a shit brick shit house.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409698</id>
	<title>Just two words.</title>
	<author>aqk</author>
	<datestamp>1268067060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Watch it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Watch it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Watch it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404242</id>
	<title>The Humanure Handbook</title>
	<author>niko9</author>
	<datestamp>1268081280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Joseph Jenkins --author of the Humanure Handbook-- has been doing this for close to thirty years. His concept also has the benefit of being <b>patent free</b> and simpler. Look see here:http://www.jenkinspublishing.com/humanure.html</p><p>All you need is a 5 gallon bucket, some cover material (rice hulls, sawdust, shredded newspaper, or coffee grounds), and teensy bit of brain power.</p><p>You can get the book on Amazon or download it for free from his site: <a href="http://humanurehandbook.com/downloads/Humanure\_Handbook\_all.pdf" title="humanurehandbook.com">http://humanurehandbook.com/downloads/Humanure\_Handbook\_all.pdf</a> [humanurehandbook.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Joseph Jenkins --author of the Humanure Handbook-- has been doing this for close to thirty years .
His concept also has the benefit of being patent free and simpler .
Look see here : http : //www.jenkinspublishing.com/humanure.htmlAll you need is a 5 gallon bucket , some cover material ( rice hulls , sawdust , shredded newspaper , or coffee grounds ) , and teensy bit of brain power.You can get the book on Amazon or download it for free from his site : http : //humanurehandbook.com/downloads/Humanure \ _Handbook \ _all.pdf [ humanurehandbook.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Joseph Jenkins --author of the Humanure Handbook-- has been doing this for close to thirty years.
His concept also has the benefit of being patent free and simpler.
Look see here:http://www.jenkinspublishing.com/humanure.htmlAll you need is a 5 gallon bucket, some cover material (rice hulls, sawdust, shredded newspaper, or coffee grounds), and teensy bit of brain power.You can get the book on Amazon or download it for free from his site: http://humanurehandbook.com/downloads/Humanure\_Handbook\_all.pdf [humanurehandbook.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406522</id>
	<title>umm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268047260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So you use it, dig a hole, throw this inside, and you cover the hole. Now, what's wrong with using the hole in the first place?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you use it , dig a hole , throw this inside , and you cover the hole .
Now , what 's wrong with using the hole in the first place ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you use it, dig a hole, throw this inside, and you cover the hole.
Now, what's wrong with using the hole in the first place?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404434</id>
	<title>Re:cost</title>
	<author>niko9</author>
	<datestamp>1268038800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>See my above post. I was in a hurry to write before, but now I have a few minutes to elaborate.</p><p>Using Mr. Jenkin's humanure method, one only needs a small bucket and clean cover material; all things that should be available locally. The humanure toilet can be kept indoors with no smell or chance of spreading any disease. After one year you will have a nice small compost pile that you can use on your food crops. No need to ship in bags or pay any patent royalties.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>See my above post .
I was in a hurry to write before , but now I have a few minutes to elaborate.Using Mr. Jenkin 's humanure method , one only needs a small bucket and clean cover material ; all things that should be available locally .
The humanure toilet can be kept indoors with no smell or chance of spreading any disease .
After one year you will have a nice small compost pile that you can use on your food crops .
No need to ship in bags or pay any patent royalties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See my above post.
I was in a hurry to write before, but now I have a few minutes to elaborate.Using Mr. Jenkin's humanure method, one only needs a small bucket and clean cover material; all things that should be available locally.
The humanure toilet can be kept indoors with no smell or chance of spreading any disease.
After one year you will have a nice small compost pile that you can use on your food crops.
No need to ship in bags or pay any patent royalties.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405924</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model?</title>
	<author>thePowerOfGrayskull</author>
	<datestamp>1268045400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why do that when one can sell them  @ $10/3 and keep it as profit to reinvest in the business or (gasp) pay to the owners?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do that when one can sell them @ $ 10/3 and keep it as profit to reinvest in the business or ( gasp ) pay to the owners ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do that when one can sell them  @ $10/3 and keep it as profit to reinvest in the business or (gasp) pay to the owners?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404864</id>
	<title>Shit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268040780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No shit</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No shit</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No shit</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31411324</id>
	<title>Re:Don't they even own a shovel?</title>
	<author>Malc</author>
	<datestamp>1268131020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you seen to the toilets in India?  And in some places (e.g. Varanasi), the streets are already a hazard for pedestrians due to the all of the shit from the wandering cows.  I don't blame people really.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you seen to the toilets in India ?
And in some places ( e.g .
Varanasi ) , the streets are already a hazard for pedestrians due to the all of the shit from the wandering cows .
I do n't blame people really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you seen to the toilets in India?
And in some places (e.g.
Varanasi), the streets are already a hazard for pedestrians due to the all of the shit from the wandering cows.
I don't blame people really.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404548</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268039280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the article<p><div class="quote"><p>He also found that slum dwellers there collected their excrement in a plastic bag and disposed of it by flinging it, calling it a &ldquo;flyaway toilet&rdquo; or a &ldquo;helicopter toilet.&rdquo;</p><p>...</p><p>He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents &mdash; comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag. </p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the articleHe also found that slum dwellers there collected their excrement in a plastic bag and disposed of it by flinging it , calling it a    flyaway toilet    or a    helicopter toilet.    ...He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents    comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the articleHe also found that slum dwellers there collected their excrement in a plastic bag and disposed of it by flinging it, calling it a “flyaway toilet” or a “helicopter toilet.”...He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents — comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag. 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409300</id>
	<title>Re:The Humanure Handbook</title>
	<author>aqk</author>
	<datestamp>1268063580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><nobr> <wbr></nobr>.....and teensy bit of <b> bran</b> power.  <br>
<br>
There- corrected it for ya.</htmltext>
<tokenext>.....and teensy bit of bran power .
There- corrected it for ya .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> .....and teensy bit of  bran power.
There- corrected it for ya.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31410152</id>
	<title>Re:Don't they even own a shovel?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268072340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Urea is not urine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Urea is not urine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Urea is not urine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31411084</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268126940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; the Romans did it over 2000 years ago using nothing but hand tools, rocks and some volcanic cement. Yes it was labor intensive, but AFAIK labor shortage isn't a problem in most 3rd world countries, is it?</p><p>You have to feed and clothe the workers, either directly or by paying them enough. The Romans did it by using their armies to build stuff when they weren't fighting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; the Romans did it over 2000 years ago using nothing but hand tools , rocks and some volcanic cement .
Yes it was labor intensive , but AFAIK labor shortage is n't a problem in most 3rd world countries , is it ? You have to feed and clothe the workers , either directly or by paying them enough .
The Romans did it by using their armies to build stuff when they were n't fighting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; the Romans did it over 2000 years ago using nothing but hand tools, rocks and some volcanic cement.
Yes it was labor intensive, but AFAIK labor shortage isn't a problem in most 3rd world countries, is it?You have to feed and clothe the workers, either directly or by paying them enough.
The Romans did it by using their armies to build stuff when they weren't fighting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404362</id>
	<title>Re:Don't they even own a shovel?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268081700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"What stops people digging latrines?"</p><p>I think you missed the part where it said ". .<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer, killing off disease-producing pathogens found in feces." The difference between shitting in a hole and burying this bag of shit in a hole is that the latter is not only sanitary, but it also helps crops grow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" What stops people digging latrines ?
" I think you missed the part where it said " .
. .a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer , killing off disease-producing pathogens found in feces .
" The difference between shitting in a hole and burying this bag of shit in a hole is that the latter is not only sanitary , but it also helps crops grow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"What stops people digging latrines?
"I think you missed the part where it said ".
. .a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer, killing off disease-producing pathogens found in feces.
" The difference between shitting in a hole and burying this bag of shit in a hole is that the latter is not only sanitary, but it also helps crops grow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408596</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>quenda</author>
	<datestamp>1268057820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you're a poor peasant living in some place where they don't even have toilets, </p></div><p>Where? I've never seen a peasant farmer who did not have a toilet of some sort.<br>In the very first paragraph of TFA it says these are for city slum dwellers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're a poor peasant living in some place where they do n't even have toilets , Where ?
I 've never seen a peasant farmer who did not have a toilet of some sort.In the very first paragraph of TFA it says these are for city slum dwellers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're a poor peasant living in some place where they don't even have toilets, Where?
I've never seen a peasant farmer who did not have a toilet of some sort.In the very first paragraph of TFA it says these are for city slum dwellers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409348</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268064060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Glad I'm not a yuppie. I'll use the bags I get when I buy groceries in the non-yuppie stores.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Glad I 'm not a yuppie .
I 'll use the bags I get when I buy groceries in the non-yuppie stores .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Glad I'm not a yuppie.
I'll use the bags I get when I buy groceries in the non-yuppie stores.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404318</id>
	<title>Hmmm....</title>
	<author>Kozar\_The\_Malignant</author>
	<datestamp>1268081580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>This must be the famous Sack of Shit I keep hearing about.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This must be the famous Sack of Shit I keep hearing about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This must be the famous Sack of Shit I keep hearing about.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404902</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system</title>
	<author>lehphyro</author>
	<datestamp>1268040900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because they are working hard for people in the developed world. You know, someone has to do the dirty jobs you no longer want to do.
Or they are being explored in every possible way by rich people. Who knows?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because they are working hard for people in the developed world .
You know , someone has to do the dirty jobs you no longer want to do .
Or they are being explored in every possible way by rich people .
Who knows ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because they are working hard for people in the developed world.
You know, someone has to do the dirty jobs you no longer want to do.
Or they are being explored in every possible way by rich people.
Who knows?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405270</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmm....</title>
	<author>Mantis8</author>
	<datestamp>1268042700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The article is incorrect as to the inventor.  The real person is Jack Schitt, which brings us to the real question, who is Jack Schitt?<br> <br>

The lineage is finally revealed! Many people are at a loss for a response when someone says: "You don't know Jack Schitt."<br>
Now you can intellectually handle the situation:<br> <br>

Jack is the only son of Awe Schitt. Awe Schitt, the fertilizer magnate, married O. Schitt, the owner of Needeep N. Schitt.<br>
They had one son, Jack. In turn, Jack Schitt married Noe Schitt. The Deeply religious couple produced six children: Holie Schitt, Fulla Schitt, Giva Schitt, Bull Schitt, and the twins Deap Schitt and Dip Schitt.<br> <br>

Against her parents objection, Deap Schitt married Dumb Schitt, a high school dropout. After being married for 15 years, Jack and Noe Schitt divorced.
Noe Schitt later remarried Ted Sherlock and, because her kids were still living with them, she wanted to keep her previous name. She was then known as Noe Shitt Sherlock.<br> <br>

Meanwhile, Dip Schitt married Loda Schitt and they produced a son of nervous disposition, Chicken Schitt.<br> <br>

Two of the other six children, Fulla Schitt and Giva Schitt, were inseparable throughout childhood and subsequently married the Happens brothers in a dual ceremony.  The wedding announcement in the newspaper announced the Schitt-Happens Wedding.  The Schitt-Happens children were Daawg, Byrd, Horace and Bull. Bull Schitt, the prodigal son, left home to tour the world. He recently returned from Italy with his new Italian bride, Pisa Schitt.<br> <br>

So now when someone says "You don't know Jack Schitt", You can correct them!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article is incorrect as to the inventor .
The real person is Jack Schitt , which brings us to the real question , who is Jack Schitt ?
The lineage is finally revealed !
Many people are at a loss for a response when someone says : " You do n't know Jack Schitt .
" Now you can intellectually handle the situation : Jack is the only son of Awe Schitt .
Awe Schitt , the fertilizer magnate , married O. Schitt , the owner of Needeep N. Schitt . They had one son , Jack .
In turn , Jack Schitt married Noe Schitt .
The Deeply religious couple produced six children : Holie Schitt , Fulla Schitt , Giva Schitt , Bull Schitt , and the twins Deap Schitt and Dip Schitt .
Against her parents objection , Deap Schitt married Dumb Schitt , a high school dropout .
After being married for 15 years , Jack and Noe Schitt divorced .
Noe Schitt later remarried Ted Sherlock and , because her kids were still living with them , she wanted to keep her previous name .
She was then known as Noe Shitt Sherlock .
Meanwhile , Dip Schitt married Loda Schitt and they produced a son of nervous disposition , Chicken Schitt .
Two of the other six children , Fulla Schitt and Giva Schitt , were inseparable throughout childhood and subsequently married the Happens brothers in a dual ceremony .
The wedding announcement in the newspaper announced the Schitt-Happens Wedding .
The Schitt-Happens children were Daawg , Byrd , Horace and Bull .
Bull Schitt , the prodigal son , left home to tour the world .
He recently returned from Italy with his new Italian bride , Pisa Schitt .
So now when someone says " You do n't know Jack Schitt " , You can correct them !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article is incorrect as to the inventor.
The real person is Jack Schitt, which brings us to the real question, who is Jack Schitt?
The lineage is finally revealed!
Many people are at a loss for a response when someone says: "You don't know Jack Schitt.
"
Now you can intellectually handle the situation: 

Jack is the only son of Awe Schitt.
Awe Schitt, the fertilizer magnate, married O. Schitt, the owner of Needeep N. Schitt.
They had one son, Jack.
In turn, Jack Schitt married Noe Schitt.
The Deeply religious couple produced six children: Holie Schitt, Fulla Schitt, Giva Schitt, Bull Schitt, and the twins Deap Schitt and Dip Schitt.
Against her parents objection, Deap Schitt married Dumb Schitt, a high school dropout.
After being married for 15 years, Jack and Noe Schitt divorced.
Noe Schitt later remarried Ted Sherlock and, because her kids were still living with them, she wanted to keep her previous name.
She was then known as Noe Shitt Sherlock.
Meanwhile, Dip Schitt married Loda Schitt and they produced a son of nervous disposition, Chicken Schitt.
Two of the other six children, Fulla Schitt and Giva Schitt, were inseparable throughout childhood and subsequently married the Happens brothers in a dual ceremony.
The wedding announcement in the newspaper announced the Schitt-Happens Wedding.
The Schitt-Happens children were Daawg, Byrd, Horace and Bull.
Bull Schitt, the prodigal son, left home to tour the world.
He recently returned from Italy with his new Italian bride, Pisa Schitt.
So now when someone says "You don't know Jack Schitt", You can correct them!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407048</id>
	<title>Re:How about California?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1268049120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uuum, it&rsquo;s called <em>fertilizer</em>! Look it up!</p><p>In most of the world, people use manure (liquid or solid) as the main fertilizer. There&rsquo;s nothing wrong with it.</p><p>As long as you&rsquo;re not doing it ON the plants. And you should always wash your food before eating it anyway.</p><p>(Protip: If washing it would destroy it, it&rsquo;s processed/industry food, and should be avoided. ^^)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uuum , it    s called fertilizer !
Look it up ! In most of the world , people use manure ( liquid or solid ) as the main fertilizer .
There    s nothing wrong with it.As long as you    re not doing it ON the plants .
And you should always wash your food before eating it anyway .
( Protip : If washing it would destroy it , it    s processed/industry food , and should be avoided .
^ ^ )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uuum, it’s called fertilizer!
Look it up!In most of the world, people use manure (liquid or solid) as the main fertilizer.
There’s nothing wrong with it.As long as you’re not doing it ON the plants.
And you should always wash your food before eating it anyway.
(Protip: If washing it would destroy it, it’s processed/industry food, and should be avoided.
^^)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404462</id>
	<title>Soylent Green is FECES!</title>
	<author>bodland</author>
	<datestamp>1268038920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh my god I am so sorry.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh my god I am so sorry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh my god I am so sorry.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404980</id>
	<title>Re:The Humanure Handbook</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1268041380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Note to self: Never, ever, ever eat any food from Joseph Jenkins' garden.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Note to self : Never , ever , ever eat any food from Joseph Jenkins ' garden .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Note to self: Never, ever, ever eat any food from Joseph Jenkins' garden.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405116</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268041980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And you think they'd have the funds to purchase diesel?  What about the infrastructure to supply it?  I agree with you about the need for sanitation, but you're also missing the point that modern plumbing didn't come about until the 19th century.  While I seriously doubt that it would take sanitation engineers for every site, one would have to find people who work with septic systems regularly that were willing to volunteer to either teach what they know or work where they're needed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And you think they 'd have the funds to purchase diesel ?
What about the infrastructure to supply it ?
I agree with you about the need for sanitation , but you 're also missing the point that modern plumbing did n't come about until the 19th century .
While I seriously doubt that it would take sanitation engineers for every site , one would have to find people who work with septic systems regularly that were willing to volunteer to either teach what they know or work where they 're needed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And you think they'd have the funds to purchase diesel?
What about the infrastructure to supply it?
I agree with you about the need for sanitation, but you're also missing the point that modern plumbing didn't come about until the 19th century.
While I seriously doubt that it would take sanitation engineers for every site, one would have to find people who work with septic systems regularly that were willing to volunteer to either teach what they know or work where they're needed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405294</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmm....</title>
	<author>pipingguy</author>
	<datestamp>1268042820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nah, that'd be me (according to my ex-wife).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nah , that 'd be me ( according to my ex-wife ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nah, that'd be me (according to my ex-wife).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31468730</id>
	<title>Compost Toilet, Anyone?</title>
	<author>TheStonepedo</author>
	<datestamp>1268490900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://members.socket.net/~llile/ConcreteStain/Compost\_Toilet\_50\_gallon\_drum.html" title="socket.net">http://members.socket.net/~llile/ConcreteStain/Compost\_Toilet\_50\_gallon\_drum.html</a> [socket.net]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //members.socket.net/ ~ llile/ConcreteStain/Compost \ _Toilet \ _50 \ _gallon \ _drum.html [ socket.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://members.socket.net/~llile/ConcreteStain/Compost\_Toilet\_50\_gallon\_drum.html [socket.net]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178</id>
	<title>Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268081100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're a poor peasant living in some place where they don't even have toilets, can you really afford bags to poo in?  Chances are food and fuel are more important to you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're a poor peasant living in some place where they do n't even have toilets , can you really afford bags to poo in ?
Chances are food and fuel are more important to you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're a poor peasant living in some place where they don't even have toilets, can you really afford bags to poo in?
Chances are food and fuel are more important to you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405280</id>
	<title>How about California?</title>
	<author>willy\_me</author>
	<datestamp>1268042760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Forget the article writeup, my first thought was California.  All of the illegals working on the fields have no place to "go".  Some farms might provide facilities but when the need is there they are too far away.  Currently, the field becomes a toilet - be sure to wash that broccoli!!
</p><p>
I might be wrong regarding the severity of the problem in California, but I know it is a problem around Vancouver.  Considering how much more produce is grown in California and its general vicinity to Mexico, I would imagine the problem being far worse.  This bag provides a possible solution.  One would just have to require that farms provide them for their workers.  And the farms can afford them.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Forget the article writeup , my first thought was California .
All of the illegals working on the fields have no place to " go " .
Some farms might provide facilities but when the need is there they are too far away .
Currently , the field becomes a toilet - be sure to wash that broccoli ! !
I might be wrong regarding the severity of the problem in California , but I know it is a problem around Vancouver .
Considering how much more produce is grown in California and its general vicinity to Mexico , I would imagine the problem being far worse .
This bag provides a possible solution .
One would just have to require that farms provide them for their workers .
And the farms can afford them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Forget the article writeup, my first thought was California.
All of the illegals working on the fields have no place to "go".
Some farms might provide facilities but when the need is there they are too far away.
Currently, the field becomes a toilet - be sure to wash that broccoli!!
I might be wrong regarding the severity of the problem in California, but I know it is a problem around Vancouver.
Considering how much more produce is grown in California and its general vicinity to Mexico, I would imagine the problem being far worse.
This bag provides a possible solution.
One would just have to require that farms provide them for their workers.
And the farms can afford them.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404234</id>
	<title>no thanks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268081280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't shit where I sleep, certainly won't shit where I eat!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't shit where I sleep , certainly wo n't shit where I eat !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't shit where I sleep, certainly won't shit where I eat!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31459460</id>
	<title>Disposable peepoo bags, cool... wait... what about</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268400840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Requiring every single bag produced everywhere to be biodegradable, duh. They can be used as peepoo bags, AND they won't clog the world's oceans, landfills, and city streets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Requiring every single bag produced everywhere to be biodegradable , duh .
They can be used as peepoo bags , AND they wo n't clog the world 's oceans , landfills , and city streets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Requiring every single bag produced everywhere to be biodegradable, duh.
They can be used as peepoo bags, AND they won't clog the world's oceans, landfills, and city streets.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404820</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>wintercolby</author>
	<datestamp>1268040540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All he needs to do is to put non-branded thank-you logos on them, and market them to the close-to-the-slums grocery stores.  I doubt that those "flyaway toilets" are paid for by the users.  More likely they're using the bags that the food originally came in.<br> <br>This only works if the bags can safely hold food products before being used for disposal at the other end of the cycle.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All he needs to do is to put non-branded thank-you logos on them , and market them to the close-to-the-slums grocery stores .
I doubt that those " flyaway toilets " are paid for by the users .
More likely they 're using the bags that the food originally came in .
This only works if the bags can safely hold food products before being used for disposal at the other end of the cycle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All he needs to do is to put non-branded thank-you logos on them, and market them to the close-to-the-slums grocery stores.
I doubt that those "flyaway toilets" are paid for by the users.
More likely they're using the bags that the food originally came in.
This only works if the bags can safely hold food products before being used for disposal at the other end of the cycle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404258</id>
	<title>Not, Bad, but...</title>
	<author>Pirate\_Pettit</author>
	<datestamp>1268081400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a pretty good idea, and one people have been tying to get right for a while, but dude - what's with the name? How is anyone ever going to take you seriously?  Nobody wants to see "4,768 Peepoo's" on an invoice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a pretty good idea , and one people have been tying to get right for a while , but dude - what 's with the name ?
How is anyone ever going to take you seriously ?
Nobody wants to see " 4,768 Peepoo 's " on an invoice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a pretty good idea, and one people have been tying to get right for a while, but dude - what's with the name?
How is anyone ever going to take you seriously?
Nobody wants to see "4,768 Peepoo's" on an invoice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407498</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model?</title>
	<author>Rick17JJ</author>
	<datestamp>1268051100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That would be similar to buy one, give one option for purchasing a BoGoLight solar powered flashlight. At the moment, they are offering the option of buy one for yourself and having the other one go to Haiti.<br><br>http://www.bogolight.com/<br><br>Another organization is the freeplayfoundation.org. They offer the option of donating a wind-up or solar powered radio to poor people in Haiti or other countries, but do not seem to have a buy one, give one option.<br><br>By the way, I do not know much about either organization.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That would be similar to buy one , give one option for purchasing a BoGoLight solar powered flashlight .
At the moment , they are offering the option of buy one for yourself and having the other one go to Haiti.http : //www.bogolight.com/Another organization is the freeplayfoundation.org .
They offer the option of donating a wind-up or solar powered radio to poor people in Haiti or other countries , but do not seem to have a buy one , give one option.By the way , I do not know much about either organization .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would be similar to buy one, give one option for purchasing a BoGoLight solar powered flashlight.
At the moment, they are offering the option of buy one for yourself and having the other one go to Haiti.http://www.bogolight.com/Another organization is the freeplayfoundation.org.
They offer the option of donating a wind-up or solar powered radio to poor people in Haiti or other countries, but do not seem to have a buy one, give one option.By the way, I do not know much about either organization.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31421552</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268141820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Also... I heard that a lot of people don't even have bread to eat. Why don't they just eat cake?</i></p><p>I think it was a rhetorical question as the obvious answer is corruption.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Also... I heard that a lot of people do n't even have bread to eat .
Why do n't they just eat cake ? I think it was a rhetorical question as the obvious answer is corruption .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also... I heard that a lot of people don't even have bread to eat.
Why don't they just eat cake?I think it was a rhetorical question as the obvious answer is corruption.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31411760</id>
	<title>Re:Better idea</title>
	<author>Jedi Alec</author>
	<datestamp>1268137500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unless you also intend to do a complete cultural overhaul <b>and</b> ban the catholic church...it won't do all that much.</p><p>Sending condoms to africa has been attempted, the continent has been infected with HIV anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless you also intend to do a complete cultural overhaul and ban the catholic church...it wo n't do all that much.Sending condoms to africa has been attempted , the continent has been infected with HIV anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless you also intend to do a complete cultural overhaul and ban the catholic church...it won't do all that much.Sending condoms to africa has been attempted, the continent has been infected with HIV anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406974</id>
	<title>Re:Don't they even own a shovel?</title>
	<author>HEbGb</author>
	<datestamp>1268048760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shitting in a hole is very sanitary, as long as the hole is not near any drinking water.  The poo breaks down pretty readily on its own, and doesn't need any help.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shitting in a hole is very sanitary , as long as the hole is not near any drinking water .
The poo breaks down pretty readily on its own , and does n't need any help .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shitting in a hole is very sanitary, as long as the hole is not near any drinking water.
The poo breaks down pretty readily on its own, and doesn't need any help.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406492</id>
	<title>Re:Don't they even own a shovel?</title>
	<author>stephanruby</author>
	<datestamp>1268047140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't know why, but in many parts of India, the government needs to pay people to use a toilet. Even when the government supplies a deluxe porta-potty, the likes of which you can only find at a multi-millionaire rapper's BBQ, the people simply won't use it.</p> </div><p>
What about you? Did you use it? </p><p>Having a super deluxe porta-potty is one thing, but what's often missing with some governments is a regular budget for the recurring maintenance, upkeep, and scheduled cleaning of such porta-potties. Also, let's not forget opening hours, I can't speak for India, but in the West, public toilets are often closed to the public right at the moment they would get their peak usage.</p><p>Also, your emphasis on the luxury of the super porta-potty evokes in me images of corruption (the politician giving the contract to his brother-in-law for instance). That would certainly explain why a country like India would throw away money on such expensive porta-potties in the first place. And unless, you can claim first-hand knowledge of those porta-potties, and can assure me that they're usually clean, open, fully-stocked, and well maintained, I'm just going to assume those porta-potties were super clean during their inauguration, and perhaps super clean when the journalists were around to take photos of them, but that's about it...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know why , but in many parts of India , the government needs to pay people to use a toilet .
Even when the government supplies a deluxe porta-potty , the likes of which you can only find at a multi-millionaire rapper 's BBQ , the people simply wo n't use it .
What about you ?
Did you use it ?
Having a super deluxe porta-potty is one thing , but what 's often missing with some governments is a regular budget for the recurring maintenance , upkeep , and scheduled cleaning of such porta-potties .
Also , let 's not forget opening hours , I ca n't speak for India , but in the West , public toilets are often closed to the public right at the moment they would get their peak usage.Also , your emphasis on the luxury of the super porta-potty evokes in me images of corruption ( the politician giving the contract to his brother-in-law for instance ) .
That would certainly explain why a country like India would throw away money on such expensive porta-potties in the first place .
And unless , you can claim first-hand knowledge of those porta-potties , and can assure me that they 're usually clean , open , fully-stocked , and well maintained , I 'm just going to assume those porta-potties were super clean during their inauguration , and perhaps super clean when the journalists were around to take photos of them , but that 's about it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know why, but in many parts of India, the government needs to pay people to use a toilet.
Even when the government supplies a deluxe porta-potty, the likes of which you can only find at a multi-millionaire rapper's BBQ, the people simply won't use it.
What about you?
Did you use it?
Having a super deluxe porta-potty is one thing, but what's often missing with some governments is a regular budget for the recurring maintenance, upkeep, and scheduled cleaning of such porta-potties.
Also, let's not forget opening hours, I can't speak for India, but in the West, public toilets are often closed to the public right at the moment they would get their peak usage.Also, your emphasis on the luxury of the super porta-potty evokes in me images of corruption (the politician giving the contract to his brother-in-law for instance).
That would certainly explain why a country like India would throw away money on such expensive porta-potties in the first place.
And unless, you can claim first-hand knowledge of those porta-potties, and can assure me that they're usually clean, open, fully-stocked, and well maintained, I'm just going to assume those porta-potties were super clean during their inauguration, and perhaps super clean when the journalists were around to take photos of them, but that's about it...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408974</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1268060640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Assuming a method can be found to transport the filled bags - otherwise they'll just become helicopters too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Assuming a method can be found to transport the filled bags - otherwise they 'll just become helicopters too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Assuming a method can be found to transport the filled bags - otherwise they'll just become helicopters too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404774</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system</title>
	<author>Dr. Evil</author>
	<datestamp>1268040300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's a nice toilet you've got there.  I wish *I* had a toilet.  You'd better not step out of your shack, it'd be a shame if somebody were to take it from you...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a nice toilet you 've got there .
I wish * I * had a toilet .
You 'd better not step out of your shack , it 'd be a shame if somebody were to take it from you.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a nice toilet you've got there.
I wish *I* had a toilet.
You'd better not step out of your shack, it'd be a shame if somebody were to take it from you...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405436</id>
	<title>Re:When you see it</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1268043360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No shit?!? You wouldn't shit me, would you? This is some good shit!</htmltext>
<tokenext>No shit ? ! ?
You would n't shit me , would you ?
This is some good shit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No shit?!?
You wouldn't shit me, would you?
This is some good shit!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31520190</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268907000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>ok these bags may be better than the current method but it's still pretty much a band-aid solution. It's hardly going to "save the world".</p><p>What I don't get is, why doesn't Kenya and all these other 3rd world countries build a real sewer system? It's not rocket science; the Romans did it over 2000 years<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.</p></div><p>human beings are the only animals to knowingly shit in their drinking water. What did the romans do - set the world up on a 2000 year obsession in wasteful uses of water engergy and a shameful lack of respect for the nutrient value in our deposits. Dry sanitation is the advanced way. Shit smells because it comes from an anaerobic environment - our bowels. Then we put in another like system - water.. God gave us two holes for a reason - it is not supposed to be mixed and he would have given us gills if shitting in water was the ideal... We all need to get over flushing toilets as a solution. It is no solution, just a transport system to move the shit from where it is laid to somewhere else where most people don't have to think about it.</p><p>A simple thought - if we cant look after our own shit, how are we going to start looking after others?</p><p>i am just waiting for my registration to come through.</p><p>Hamish Skermer from Australia/ uk / Norway / world</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>ok these bags may be better than the current method but it 's still pretty much a band-aid solution .
It 's hardly going to " save the world " .What I do n't get is , why does n't Kenya and all these other 3rd world countries build a real sewer system ?
It 's not rocket science ; the Romans did it over 2000 years .human beings are the only animals to knowingly shit in their drinking water .
What did the romans do - set the world up on a 2000 year obsession in wasteful uses of water engergy and a shameful lack of respect for the nutrient value in our deposits .
Dry sanitation is the advanced way .
Shit smells because it comes from an anaerobic environment - our bowels .
Then we put in another like system - water.. God gave us two holes for a reason - it is not supposed to be mixed and he would have given us gills if shitting in water was the ideal... We all need to get over flushing toilets as a solution .
It is no solution , just a transport system to move the shit from where it is laid to somewhere else where most people do n't have to think about it.A simple thought - if we cant look after our own shit , how are we going to start looking after others ? i am just waiting for my registration to come through.Hamish Skermer from Australia/ uk / Norway / world</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ok these bags may be better than the current method but it's still pretty much a band-aid solution.
It's hardly going to "save the world".What I don't get is, why doesn't Kenya and all these other 3rd world countries build a real sewer system?
It's not rocket science; the Romans did it over 2000 years .human beings are the only animals to knowingly shit in their drinking water.
What did the romans do - set the world up on a 2000 year obsession in wasteful uses of water engergy and a shameful lack of respect for the nutrient value in our deposits.
Dry sanitation is the advanced way.
Shit smells because it comes from an anaerobic environment - our bowels.
Then we put in another like system - water.. God gave us two holes for a reason - it is not supposed to be mixed and he would have given us gills if shitting in water was the ideal... We all need to get over flushing toilets as a solution.
It is no solution, just a transport system to move the shit from where it is laid to somewhere else where most people don't have to think about it.A simple thought - if we cant look after our own shit, how are we going to start looking after others?i am just waiting for my registration to come through.Hamish Skermer from Australia/ uk / Norway / world
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405766</id>
	<title>Re:Don't they even own a shovel?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268044740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(Score:5, Depressing)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( Score : 5 , Depressing )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(Score:5, Depressing)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409478</id>
	<title>Re:cost  THREE cents?</title>
	<author>aqk</author>
	<datestamp>1268065140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Geez, I'm paying 5 cents for plastic bags in the supermarket now!  <br>
Maybe I could use things to take home the groceries in!  <br>
 <br>I just have to make sure though that when I get home, I don't get confused as to which bag is which...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Geez , I 'm paying 5 cents for plastic bags in the supermarket now !
Maybe I could use things to take home the groceries in !
I just have to make sure though that when I get home , I do n't get confused as to which bag is which.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geez, I'm paying 5 cents for plastic bags in the supermarket now!
Maybe I could use things to take home the groceries in!
I just have to make sure though that when I get home, I don't get confused as to which bag is which...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31412872</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268146860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except they aren't paying for the existing bags</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except they are n't paying for the existing bags</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except they aren't paying for the existing bags</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404444</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>Ractive</author>
	<datestamp>1268038860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>RTFA  <br>
it's for URBAN areas where people already crap in plastic bags and throw them helicopter style, this addresses the sanitation/disease problem.</htmltext>
<tokenext>RTFA it 's for URBAN areas where people already crap in plastic bags and throw them helicopter style , this addresses the sanitation/disease problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RTFA  
it's for URBAN areas where people already crap in plastic bags and throw them helicopter style, this addresses the sanitation/disease problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404430</id>
	<title>Re:cost</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1268038800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFA: "He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents -- comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : " He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents -- comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA: "He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents -- comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407096</id>
	<title>Re:The guy creates a brilliant solution...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1268049240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah. Five-year-olds. Not grown ups.</p><p>But from the comments I see here, it seems that that is exactly Slashdot&rsquo;s target group.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah .
Five-year-olds. Not grown ups.But from the comments I see here , it seems that that is exactly Slashdot    s target group .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah.
Five-year-olds. Not grown ups.But from the comments I see here, it seems that that is exactly Slashdot’s target group.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409542</id>
	<title>Re:cost</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268065560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>From TFA: "He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents -- comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag."</p></div><p>Now if you could sell a bag with poo in it for 5 cents you could make money distributing and collecting them from a shopping cart.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : " He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents -- comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag .
" Now if you could sell a bag with poo in it for 5 cents you could make money distributing and collecting them from a shopping cart .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA: "He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents -- comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag.
"Now if you could sell a bag with poo in it for 5 cents you could make money distributing and collecting them from a shopping cart.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404712</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system</title>
	<author>Sir\_Real</author>
	<datestamp>1268039940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Labor shortage not so much, but roving gangs of rifle armed religious fanatics, well... that's something the Roman's never had to deal with</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Labor shortage not so much , but roving gangs of rifle armed religious fanatics , well... that 's something the Roman 's never had to deal with</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Labor shortage not so much, but roving gangs of rifle armed religious fanatics, well... that's something the Roman's never had to deal with</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407002</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>NFN\_NLN</author>
	<datestamp>1268048940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>From the article: "He also found that slum dwellers there collected their excrement in a plastic bag and disposed of it by flinging it He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents &mdash; comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag."</p></div><p>Bagged poo flinging?!  Hey, when you're poor you have to get your entertainment any way you can.</p><p>If I was poor I'd carry my poo-bag on a stick like a hobo.  Then I'd use the stick as a make-shift treb-poo-chet to launch it at some rich bastards house.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article : " He also found that slum dwellers there collected their excrement in a plastic bag and disposed of it by flinging it He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents    comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag .
" Bagged poo flinging ? !
Hey , when you 're poor you have to get your entertainment any way you can.If I was poor I 'd carry my poo-bag on a stick like a hobo .
Then I 'd use the stick as a make-shift treb-poo-chet to launch it at some rich bastards house .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article: "He also found that slum dwellers there collected their excrement in a plastic bag and disposed of it by flinging it He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents — comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag.
"Bagged poo flinging?!
Hey, when you're poor you have to get your entertainment any way you can.If I was poor I'd carry my poo-bag on a stick like a hobo.
Then I'd use the stick as a make-shift treb-poo-chet to launch it at some rich bastards house.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407430</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmm....</title>
	<author>steelfood</author>
	<datestamp>1268050860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now that's one Bag of Crap I <i>don't</i> want from Woot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that 's one Bag of Crap I do n't want from Woot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that's one Bag of Crap I don't want from Woot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404272</id>
	<title>&ldquo;they can reuse this to grow crops.&rdquo;'</title>
	<author>BigDXLT</author>
	<datestamp>1268081400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fat Bastard: "I don't remember planting any corn!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fat Bastard : " I do n't remember planting any corn !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fat Bastard: "I don't remember planting any corn!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408166</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>jmrives</author>
	<datestamp>1268054940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, lets see. You may be right. According to the article, the item will sell for 2 - 3 pennies. Lets assume 3 pennies. Now, lets also assume a potential customer is regular once-a-day. That would mean they would need 365 * 3 pennies = 1095 pennies or $10.95/per year. That may not seem like much but when a person's annual income is measured in hundreds of dollars (some times less), that amount might be significant. To offset this, we should consider that there may be some value added -- especially if the person needs to buy fertilizer to grow crops. The big factor to consider is whether governments and aide organizations see sanitation -- especially in inner city slums -- as a high enough priority to fund this so that there is no cost to the individual. From the article:<p><div class="quote"><p>In the developing world, an estimated 2.6 billion people, or about 40 percent of the earth&rsquo;s population, do not have access to a toilet, according to United Nations figures.
</p><p>It is a public health crisis: open defecation can contaminate drinking water, and an estimated 1.5 million children worldwide die yearly from diarrhea, largely because of poor sanitation and hygiene.
</p><p>To mitigate this, the United Nations has a goal to reduce by half the number of people without access to toilets by 2015.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , lets see .
You may be right .
According to the article , the item will sell for 2 - 3 pennies .
Lets assume 3 pennies .
Now , lets also assume a potential customer is regular once-a-day .
That would mean they would need 365 * 3 pennies = 1095 pennies or $ 10.95/per year .
That may not seem like much but when a person 's annual income is measured in hundreds of dollars ( some times less ) , that amount might be significant .
To offset this , we should consider that there may be some value added -- especially if the person needs to buy fertilizer to grow crops .
The big factor to consider is whether governments and aide organizations see sanitation -- especially in inner city slums -- as a high enough priority to fund this so that there is no cost to the individual .
From the article : In the developing world , an estimated 2.6 billion people , or about 40 percent of the earth    s population , do not have access to a toilet , according to United Nations figures .
It is a public health crisis : open defecation can contaminate drinking water , and an estimated 1.5 million children worldwide die yearly from diarrhea , largely because of poor sanitation and hygiene .
To mitigate this , the United Nations has a goal to reduce by half the number of people without access to toilets by 2015 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, lets see.
You may be right.
According to the article, the item will sell for 2 - 3 pennies.
Lets assume 3 pennies.
Now, lets also assume a potential customer is regular once-a-day.
That would mean they would need 365 * 3 pennies = 1095 pennies or $10.95/per year.
That may not seem like much but when a person's annual income is measured in hundreds of dollars (some times less), that amount might be significant.
To offset this, we should consider that there may be some value added -- especially if the person needs to buy fertilizer to grow crops.
The big factor to consider is whether governments and aide organizations see sanitation -- especially in inner city slums -- as a high enough priority to fund this so that there is no cost to the individual.
From the article:In the developing world, an estimated 2.6 billion people, or about 40 percent of the earth’s population, do not have access to a toilet, according to United Nations figures.
It is a public health crisis: open defecation can contaminate drinking water, and an estimated 1.5 million children worldwide die yearly from diarrhea, largely because of poor sanitation and hygiene.
To mitigate this, the United Nations has a goal to reduce by half the number of people without access to toilets by 2015.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404554</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268039280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly.  Going behind a bush is free and works just as well.  This is good for environmentally conscious rich people only!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
Going behind a bush is free and works just as well .
This is good for environmentally conscious rich people only ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
Going behind a bush is free and works just as well.
This is good for environmentally conscious rich people only!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404296</id>
	<title>Flying Latrine</title>
	<author>BradleyUffner</author>
	<datestamp>1268081520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from\_our\_own\_correspondent/6253564.stm" title="bbc.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from\_our\_own\_correspondent/6253564.stm</a> [bbc.co.uk]</p><p>It's been done.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from \ _our \ _own \ _correspondent/6253564.stm [ bbc.co.uk ] It 's been done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from\_our\_own\_correspondent/6253564.stm [bbc.co.uk]It's been done.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405226</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system</title>
	<author>borkus</author>
	<datestamp>1268042520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, decent sewer systems are a lot more recent that that.  Romans only had sewer systems in large cities.  European royalty still died of cholera in the 19th century and the US had a cholera epidemic as late as 1910.  So effective modern water treatment and sewerage has only been around since the early 20th century.</p><p>First hand, I own a 19th house in a medium sized city on the US east coast.  Built on the edge of town in 1855, it had an outhouse until the early 1920s.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , decent sewer systems are a lot more recent that that .
Romans only had sewer systems in large cities .
European royalty still died of cholera in the 19th century and the US had a cholera epidemic as late as 1910 .
So effective modern water treatment and sewerage has only been around since the early 20th century.First hand , I own a 19th house in a medium sized city on the US east coast .
Built on the edge of town in 1855 , it had an outhouse until the early 1920s .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, decent sewer systems are a lot more recent that that.
Romans only had sewer systems in large cities.
European royalty still died of cholera in the 19th century and the US had a cholera epidemic as late as 1910.
So effective modern water treatment and sewerage has only been around since the early 20th century.First hand, I own a 19th house in a medium sized city on the US east coast.
Built on the edge of town in 1855, it had an outhouse until the early 1920s.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404396</id>
	<title>Re:cost</title>
	<author>h4rr4r</author>
	<datestamp>1268081880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So what happens to bags of crap they already toss out the window? At some point they have to be cleaned up by someone or you would just have massive mountains of HDPE bags filled with human feces.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So what happens to bags of crap they already toss out the window ?
At some point they have to be cleaned up by someone or you would just have massive mountains of HDPE bags filled with human feces .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what happens to bags of crap they already toss out the window?
At some point they have to be cleaned up by someone or you would just have massive mountains of HDPE bags filled with human feces.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404890</id>
	<title>Re:Perfect for those really long WoW raids.</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1268040840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Look at the base of the thing in the picture.... I think you've found the main design element for the peepoo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Look at the base of the thing in the picture.... I think you 've found the main design element for the peepoo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look at the base of the thing in the picture.... I think you've found the main design element for the peepoo.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404664</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268039700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What I don't get is, why doesn't Kenya and all these other 3rd world countries build a real sewer system?</p></div> </blockquote><p>
A couple of issues:  First is often water supply.  If you don't have a reasonable water supply, it's hard to build a complex sewer system which relies on water flow.  If you're trying to compost things, that's a bit easier in this respect but this leads to the other major problem:  Civil planning and infrastructure.  It's pretty easy to make a composting toilet / latrine / whatever for low population density places.  It's hard to do so for shanty towns which tend to have a high population density and very low ability to plan major projects. <br> <br>
You just don't build a sewer system.  It takes lots of planning - remember shit flows downhill.  You really, really want the downhill to be the correct one.  It doesn't work if a bunch of squatters starts digging a hole to dump their waste on the next group of squatters.  You need engineers, surveyors, the ability to determine property lines, etc. <br> <br>
Certainly this isn't rocket science and if the local warlords quit trying to rape the countryside for their own gains all of the time, you could imagine it getting done, but it just doesn't seem to happen much.  Functioning civil governance is often taken for granted.  It shouldn't be.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What I do n't get is , why does n't Kenya and all these other 3rd world countries build a real sewer system ?
A couple of issues : First is often water supply .
If you do n't have a reasonable water supply , it 's hard to build a complex sewer system which relies on water flow .
If you 're trying to compost things , that 's a bit easier in this respect but this leads to the other major problem : Civil planning and infrastructure .
It 's pretty easy to make a composting toilet / latrine / whatever for low population density places .
It 's hard to do so for shanty towns which tend to have a high population density and very low ability to plan major projects .
You just do n't build a sewer system .
It takes lots of planning - remember shit flows downhill .
You really , really want the downhill to be the correct one .
It does n't work if a bunch of squatters starts digging a hole to dump their waste on the next group of squatters .
You need engineers , surveyors , the ability to determine property lines , etc .
Certainly this is n't rocket science and if the local warlords quit trying to rape the countryside for their own gains all of the time , you could imagine it getting done , but it just does n't seem to happen much .
Functioning civil governance is often taken for granted .
It should n't be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I don't get is, why doesn't Kenya and all these other 3rd world countries build a real sewer system?
A couple of issues:  First is often water supply.
If you don't have a reasonable water supply, it's hard to build a complex sewer system which relies on water flow.
If you're trying to compost things, that's a bit easier in this respect but this leads to the other major problem:  Civil planning and infrastructure.
It's pretty easy to make a composting toilet / latrine / whatever for low population density places.
It's hard to do so for shanty towns which tend to have a high population density and very low ability to plan major projects.
You just don't build a sewer system.
It takes lots of planning - remember shit flows downhill.
You really, really want the downhill to be the correct one.
It doesn't work if a bunch of squatters starts digging a hole to dump their waste on the next group of squatters.
You need engineers, surveyors, the ability to determine property lines, etc.
Certainly this isn't rocket science and if the local warlords quit trying to rape the countryside for their own gains all of the time, you could imagine it getting done, but it just doesn't seem to happen much.
Functioning civil governance is often taken for granted.
It shouldn't be.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408612</id>
	<title>Re:Don't they even own a shovel?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268057880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>or too stupid.</p></div><p>We prefer the term "knowledge impaired".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>or too stupid.We prefer the term " knowledge impaired " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or too stupid.We prefer the term "knowledge impaired".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405312</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268042880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This can be used today in Haiti and Chile' or any disaster torn area.  Government's should buy these by the truck load.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This can be used today in Haiti and Chile ' or any disaster torn area .
Government 's should buy these by the truck load .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This can be used today in Haiti and Chile' or any disaster torn area.
Government's should buy these by the truck load.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404416</id>
	<title>Perhaps a buy one donate several model?</title>
	<author>ravenscar</author>
	<datestamp>1268081940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It would be interesting to see a corporate model that allows these items to be sold to the hiker/camper crowd in the first world with revenue for those sales being used to donate the bags to places with a need.  For example, I could easily see the Seattle area yuppie hiker crowd paying $10 for three bags at REI.  Let's say it costs $5 to produce, package, import, market, and retail these bags.  $4 of the remaining $5 could be used to produce more bags and donate them to international aid organizations.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be interesting to see a corporate model that allows these items to be sold to the hiker/camper crowd in the first world with revenue for those sales being used to donate the bags to places with a need .
For example , I could easily see the Seattle area yuppie hiker crowd paying $ 10 for three bags at REI .
Let 's say it costs $ 5 to produce , package , import , market , and retail these bags .
$ 4 of the remaining $ 5 could be used to produce more bags and donate them to international aid organizations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be interesting to see a corporate model that allows these items to be sold to the hiker/camper crowd in the first world with revenue for those sales being used to donate the bags to places with a need.
For example, I could easily see the Seattle area yuppie hiker crowd paying $10 for three bags at REI.
Let's say it costs $5 to produce, package, import, market, and retail these bags.
$4 of the remaining $5 could be used to produce more bags and donate them to international aid organizations.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405498</id>
	<title>In Soviet Russia</title>
	<author>davidwr</author>
	<datestamp>1268043600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Disposable toilets fertilize YOU!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Disposable toilets fertilize YOU !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Disposable toilets fertilize YOU!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406908</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>NFN\_NLN</author>
	<datestamp>1268048520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you're a poor peasant living in some place where they don't even have toilets, can you really afford bags to poo in?  Chances are food and fuel are more important to you.</p></div><p>This still has applications in a semi-first world nation like the US, especially during a disaster scenario.  Before you say food and water are more important, you might want to reflect back on the Superdome incident.  Feces from thousands of people in 100 degree weather contained in the Superdome and it starts to become more important than food (but not water).</p><p>"During that lonely and frightening time, Norton starved himself in fear of having to use the restroom facilities. An unthinkable stench of feces permeated the Superdome. As disgusting as the restrooms were, Norton vowed to only drink water to keep from dehydrating. Fearing for his safety, he urinated only in the upper level of the dome."</p><p>Former USM student is finally able to tell of Katrina nightmare:<br><a href="http://www.usm.edu/afterkatrina/Bueto.html" title="usm.edu">http://www.usm.edu/afterkatrina/Bueto.html</a> [usm.edu]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're a poor peasant living in some place where they do n't even have toilets , can you really afford bags to poo in ?
Chances are food and fuel are more important to you.This still has applications in a semi-first world nation like the US , especially during a disaster scenario .
Before you say food and water are more important , you might want to reflect back on the Superdome incident .
Feces from thousands of people in 100 degree weather contained in the Superdome and it starts to become more important than food ( but not water ) .
" During that lonely and frightening time , Norton starved himself in fear of having to use the restroom facilities .
An unthinkable stench of feces permeated the Superdome .
As disgusting as the restrooms were , Norton vowed to only drink water to keep from dehydrating .
Fearing for his safety , he urinated only in the upper level of the dome .
" Former USM student is finally able to tell of Katrina nightmare : http : //www.usm.edu/afterkatrina/Bueto.html [ usm.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're a poor peasant living in some place where they don't even have toilets, can you really afford bags to poo in?
Chances are food and fuel are more important to you.This still has applications in a semi-first world nation like the US, especially during a disaster scenario.
Before you say food and water are more important, you might want to reflect back on the Superdome incident.
Feces from thousands of people in 100 degree weather contained in the Superdome and it starts to become more important than food (but not water).
"During that lonely and frightening time, Norton starved himself in fear of having to use the restroom facilities.
An unthinkable stench of feces permeated the Superdome.
As disgusting as the restrooms were, Norton vowed to only drink water to keep from dehydrating.
Fearing for his safety, he urinated only in the upper level of the dome.
"Former USM student is finally able to tell of Katrina nightmare:http://www.usm.edu/afterkatrina/Bueto.html [usm.edu]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409182</id>
	<title>Re:The Humanure Handbook</title>
	<author>hughperkins</author>
	<datestamp>1268062380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... or go exploring in his back-garden shed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... or go exploring in his back-garden shed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... or go exploring in his back-garden shed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404184</id>
	<title>Yes but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268081100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...can you use it while driving 90mph?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...can you use it while driving 90mph ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...can you use it while driving 90mph?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254</id>
	<title>Why don't they build themselves a sewer system</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268081340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>ok these bags may be better than the current method but it's still pretty much a band-aid solution. It's hardly going to "save the world".<br> <br>

What I don't get is, why doesn't Kenya and all these other 3rd world countries build a real sewer system? It's not rocket science; the Romans did it over 2000 years ago using nothing but hand tools, rocks and some volcanic cement. Yes it was labor intensive, but AFAIK labor shortage isn't a problem in most 3rd world countries, is it? Besides they should be able to get access to some heavy diesel equipment on loan through UNICEF or World Bank or some such organization.</htmltext>
<tokenext>ok these bags may be better than the current method but it 's still pretty much a band-aid solution .
It 's hardly going to " save the world " .
What I do n't get is , why does n't Kenya and all these other 3rd world countries build a real sewer system ?
It 's not rocket science ; the Romans did it over 2000 years ago using nothing but hand tools , rocks and some volcanic cement .
Yes it was labor intensive , but AFAIK labor shortage is n't a problem in most 3rd world countries , is it ?
Besides they should be able to get access to some heavy diesel equipment on loan through UNICEF or World Bank or some such organization .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ok these bags may be better than the current method but it's still pretty much a band-aid solution.
It's hardly going to "save the world".
What I don't get is, why doesn't Kenya and all these other 3rd world countries build a real sewer system?
It's not rocket science; the Romans did it over 2000 years ago using nothing but hand tools, rocks and some volcanic cement.
Yes it was labor intensive, but AFAIK labor shortage isn't a problem in most 3rd world countries, is it?
Besides they should be able to get access to some heavy diesel equipment on loan through UNICEF or World Bank or some such organization.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404704</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268039940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Niggers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Niggers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Niggers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404526</id>
	<title>pharmaceuticals the real cost</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268039160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Human wast composts itself if buried properly, the real threat is all the pharmaceuticals we are taking. Yes I know people in poorer countries are not taking as many crazy drugs as most first world citizens, but still what happens when all the AIDS retrovirals being consumed are now tilled into the soil and part of the next growth of crops, mixed with the watter supply, etc. Maybe nothing and maybe<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Human wast composts itself if buried properly , the real threat is all the pharmaceuticals we are taking .
Yes I know people in poorer countries are not taking as many crazy drugs as most first world citizens , but still what happens when all the AIDS retrovirals being consumed are now tilled into the soil and part of the next growth of crops , mixed with the watter supply , etc .
Maybe nothing and maybe ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Human wast composts itself if buried properly, the real threat is all the pharmaceuticals we are taking.
Yes I know people in poorer countries are not taking as many crazy drugs as most first world citizens, but still what happens when all the AIDS retrovirals being consumed are now tilled into the soil and part of the next growth of crops, mixed with the watter supply, etc.
Maybe nothing and maybe ....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404866</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system</title>
	<author>Conchobair</author>
	<datestamp>1268040780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh yes, let's have them build a functional and self maintaing sewer system and let them eat cake too while we're at it.<br> <br>
First thing I thought of when I read this was the images of a poop covered beach in Liberia I saw in the <a href="http://www.vbs.tv/watch/the-vice-guide-to-travel/the-vice-guide-to-liberia-1-of-8" title="www.vbs.tv">Vice Guide to Liberia</a> [www.vbs.tv].  Watching that it&rsquo;s hard to understand how things got so bad, but there is so much that needs fixed there.  This is a nice simple solution that could help.  I really think if you bring in a bunch of equipment and money, it either going to get stolen or misappropriated.  It's hard enough to keep the peace let alone embark on a solid construction project.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yes , let 's have them build a functional and self maintaing sewer system and let them eat cake too while we 're at it .
First thing I thought of when I read this was the images of a poop covered beach in Liberia I saw in the Vice Guide to Liberia [ www.vbs.tv ] .
Watching that it    s hard to understand how things got so bad , but there is so much that needs fixed there .
This is a nice simple solution that could help .
I really think if you bring in a bunch of equipment and money , it either going to get stolen or misappropriated .
It 's hard enough to keep the peace let alone embark on a solid construction project .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yes, let's have them build a functional and self maintaing sewer system and let them eat cake too while we're at it.
First thing I thought of when I read this was the images of a poop covered beach in Liberia I saw in the Vice Guide to Liberia [www.vbs.tv].
Watching that it’s hard to understand how things got so bad, but there is so much that needs fixed there.
This is a nice simple solution that could help.
I really think if you bring in a bunch of equipment and money, it either going to get stolen or misappropriated.
It's hard enough to keep the peace let alone embark on a solid construction project.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405030</id>
	<title>Named and Marketed by the Same People...</title>
	<author>RobotRunAmok</author>
	<datestamp>1268041620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...who brought you "The Gimp."  Another great product no self-respecting adult will ever ask for by name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...who brought you " The Gimp .
" Another great product no self-respecting adult will ever ask for by name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...who brought you "The Gimp.
"  Another great product no self-respecting adult will ever ask for by name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404852</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1268040720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're a poor peasant living in some place where they don't even have toilets, and you work your farm day in and day out - and you could take part of your earning to increase your production - wouldn't you invest?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're a poor peasant living in some place where they do n't even have toilets , and you work your farm day in and day out - and you could take part of your earning to increase your production - would n't you invest ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're a poor peasant living in some place where they don't even have toilets, and you work your farm day in and day out - and you could take part of your earning to increase your production - wouldn't you invest?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404278</id>
	<title>Already exists</title>
	<author>frist</author>
	<datestamp>1268081460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.thepett.com/" title="thepett.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thepett.com/</a> [thepett.com]
<a href="http://www.thepett.com/index.php?PageLayout=PRODUCTS&amp;pageID=95" title="thepett.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thepett.com/index.php?PageLayout=PRODUCTS&amp;pageID=95</a> [thepett.com]

Too late. These are already in use. The "poo powder" is some kind of fungus that reacts w/the heat and liquid and gives off gas that kills the bacteria, so you can toss the bag in a trash can, landfill etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.thepett.com/ [ thepett.com ] http : //www.thepett.com/index.php ? PageLayout = PRODUCTS&amp;pageID = 95 [ thepett.com ] Too late .
These are already in use .
The " poo powder " is some kind of fungus that reacts w/the heat and liquid and gives off gas that kills the bacteria , so you can toss the bag in a trash can , landfill etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.thepett.com/ [thepett.com]
http://www.thepett.com/index.php?PageLayout=PRODUCTS&amp;pageID=95 [thepett.com]

Too late.
These are already in use.
The "poo powder" is some kind of fungus that reacts w/the heat and liquid and gives off gas that kills the bacteria, so you can toss the bag in a trash can, landfill etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405526</id>
	<title>Re:The Humanure Handbook</title>
	<author>avagpingham</author>
	<datestamp>1268043720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did you read the article?

"He also found that slum dwellers there collected their excrement in a plastic bag and disposed of it by flinging it, calling it a 'flyaway toilet' or a 'helicopter toilet.'...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents &mdash; comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag."

The inventor saw a problem and came up with a solution.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you read the article ?
" He also found that slum dwellers there collected their excrement in a plastic bag and disposed of it by flinging it , calling it a 'flyaway toilet ' or a 'helicopter toilet.'.. .
...He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents    comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag .
" The inventor saw a problem and came up with a solution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you read the article?
"He also found that slum dwellers there collected their excrement in a plastic bag and disposed of it by flinging it, calling it a 'flyaway toilet' or a 'helicopter toilet.'...
...He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents — comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag.
"

The inventor saw a problem and came up with a solution.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404592</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>postglock</author>
	<datestamp>1268039400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the article: "He also found that slum dwellers there collected their excrement in a plastic bag and disposed of it by flinging it He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents &mdash; comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag."</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article : " He also found that slum dwellers there collected their excrement in a plastic bag and disposed of it by flinging it He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents    comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article: "He also found that slum dwellers there collected their excrement in a plastic bag and disposed of it by flinging it He plans to sell it for about 2 or 3 cents — comparable to the cost of an ordinary plastic bag.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408608</id>
	<title>If it doesn't work as fertilizer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268057880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you can always light it and throw it on someone's doorstep, ring the bell and run.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you can always light it and throw it on someone 's doorstep , ring the bell and run .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you can always light it and throw it on someone's doorstep, ring the bell and run.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406270</id>
	<title>Re:I think it's a nice solution</title>
	<author>j00r0m4nc3r</author>
	<datestamp>1268046480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm really glad to see that someone found a way to make human waste safe for crops.</p><p> That has been a big issue in general for farmers in countries where there are less than adequate water safety facilities.</p><p> It's hard to afford fertilizer in war-torn or otherwise de-stabilized countries when you have a bunch of kids to feed.</p></div><p>
Except that using <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night\_soil" title="wikipedia.org">human waste</a> [wikipedia.org] for fertilizer is actually pretty dangerous, unless you do it extremely carefully.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm really glad to see that someone found a way to make human waste safe for crops .
That has been a big issue in general for farmers in countries where there are less than adequate water safety facilities .
It 's hard to afford fertilizer in war-torn or otherwise de-stabilized countries when you have a bunch of kids to feed .
Except that using human waste [ wikipedia.org ] for fertilizer is actually pretty dangerous , unless you do it extremely carefully .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm really glad to see that someone found a way to make human waste safe for crops.
That has been a big issue in general for farmers in countries where there are less than adequate water safety facilities.
It's hard to afford fertilizer in war-torn or otherwise de-stabilized countries when you have a bunch of kids to feed.
Except that using human waste [wikipedia.org] for fertilizer is actually pretty dangerous, unless you do it extremely carefully.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409336</id>
	<title>Re:cost</title>
	<author>aqk</author>
	<datestamp>1268063940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>No more tossing out of the window!  That is now forbidden. <br>
The bags are to be kept in the hallway, where, with a bit of water and some overhead fluorescents,<br>
a successful grow-op may be established! <br>
 <br>It's already working quite successfully in British Columbia, so I hear....</htmltext>
<tokenext>No more tossing out of the window !
That is now forbidden .
The bags are to be kept in the hallway , where , with a bit of water and some overhead fluorescents , a successful grow-op may be established !
It 's already working quite successfully in British Columbia , so I hear... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No more tossing out of the window!
That is now forbidden.
The bags are to be kept in the hallway, where, with a bit of water and some overhead fluorescents,
a successful grow-op may be established!
It's already working quite successfully in British Columbia, so I hear....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408470</id>
	<title>Re:How about California?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268056860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is something seriously wrong in America if we have to <i>regress</i> from the toilet to using shit bags. WTF is wrong with you people!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is something seriously wrong in America if we have to regress from the toilet to using shit bags .
WTF is wrong with you people !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is something seriously wrong in America if we have to regress from the toilet to using shit bags.
WTF is wrong with you people!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405118</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system</title>
	<author>Ephemeriis</author>
	<datestamp>1268041980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What I don't get is, why doesn't Kenya and all these other 3rd world countries build a real sewer system?</p></div><p>That's kind of like asking why doesn't the USA build a telecommunication system.</p><p>There's certainly room for government direction, funding, and oversight...  But you aren't talking about a single place where you have to lay a few pipes.  We're talking about an assortment of cities, towns, and villages...  Each with their own local governments...  Each with their own unique geography...</p><p>I'm sure some places in Kenya have a sewer system.  But I'll tell you right now there are places in the USA that don't have a sewer system yet.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It's not rocket science; the Romans did it over 2000 years ago using nothing but hand tools, rocks and some volcanic cement. Yes it was labor intensive, but AFAIK labor shortage isn't a problem in most 3rd world countries, is it?</p></div><p>Neither labor nor know-how are generally the problem.</p><p>Generally the problem is a lack of funds and/or interest to build and maintain the system.</p><p>Imagine trying to convince someone in rural Minnesota, who's never owned a computer or done anything on the Internet, that they really ought to chip in some money with their neighbors to run a big ol' fiber-optic cable out to their town; so that they can all have blazing fast Internet connections.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Besides they should be able to get access to some heavy diesel equipment on loan through UNICEF or World Bank or some such organization.</p></div><p>Generally speaking, more debt is the <b>last</b> thing these countries need.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It's hardly going to "save the world".</p></div><p>Public sanitation, or lack there-of, is a <b>huge</b> issue - everywhere.</p><p>Contaminated water is a fantastic way to transmit disease.</p><p>One of the first concerns after any major disaster is to establish a supply of clean water.  That's why you always see the huge crates of bottled water, and the tanker trucks, and everything else.</p><p>If you can contain and/or properly treat this human waste, instead of leaving it to contaminate the water and spread disease, you are certainly taking steps in the right direction.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What I do n't get is , why does n't Kenya and all these other 3rd world countries build a real sewer system ? That 's kind of like asking why does n't the USA build a telecommunication system.There 's certainly room for government direction , funding , and oversight... But you are n't talking about a single place where you have to lay a few pipes .
We 're talking about an assortment of cities , towns , and villages... Each with their own local governments... Each with their own unique geography...I 'm sure some places in Kenya have a sewer system .
But I 'll tell you right now there are places in the USA that do n't have a sewer system yet.It 's not rocket science ; the Romans did it over 2000 years ago using nothing but hand tools , rocks and some volcanic cement .
Yes it was labor intensive , but AFAIK labor shortage is n't a problem in most 3rd world countries , is it ? Neither labor nor know-how are generally the problem.Generally the problem is a lack of funds and/or interest to build and maintain the system.Imagine trying to convince someone in rural Minnesota , who 's never owned a computer or done anything on the Internet , that they really ought to chip in some money with their neighbors to run a big ol ' fiber-optic cable out to their town ; so that they can all have blazing fast Internet connections.Besides they should be able to get access to some heavy diesel equipment on loan through UNICEF or World Bank or some such organization.Generally speaking , more debt is the last thing these countries need.It 's hardly going to " save the world " .Public sanitation , or lack there-of , is a huge issue - everywhere.Contaminated water is a fantastic way to transmit disease.One of the first concerns after any major disaster is to establish a supply of clean water .
That 's why you always see the huge crates of bottled water , and the tanker trucks , and everything else.If you can contain and/or properly treat this human waste , instead of leaving it to contaminate the water and spread disease , you are certainly taking steps in the right direction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I don't get is, why doesn't Kenya and all these other 3rd world countries build a real sewer system?That's kind of like asking why doesn't the USA build a telecommunication system.There's certainly room for government direction, funding, and oversight...  But you aren't talking about a single place where you have to lay a few pipes.
We're talking about an assortment of cities, towns, and villages...  Each with their own local governments...  Each with their own unique geography...I'm sure some places in Kenya have a sewer system.
But I'll tell you right now there are places in the USA that don't have a sewer system yet.It's not rocket science; the Romans did it over 2000 years ago using nothing but hand tools, rocks and some volcanic cement.
Yes it was labor intensive, but AFAIK labor shortage isn't a problem in most 3rd world countries, is it?Neither labor nor know-how are generally the problem.Generally the problem is a lack of funds and/or interest to build and maintain the system.Imagine trying to convince someone in rural Minnesota, who's never owned a computer or done anything on the Internet, that they really ought to chip in some money with their neighbors to run a big ol' fiber-optic cable out to their town; so that they can all have blazing fast Internet connections.Besides they should be able to get access to some heavy diesel equipment on loan through UNICEF or World Bank or some such organization.Generally speaking, more debt is the last thing these countries need.It's hardly going to "save the world".Public sanitation, or lack there-of, is a huge issue - everywhere.Contaminated water is a fantastic way to transmit disease.One of the first concerns after any major disaster is to establish a supply of clean water.
That's why you always see the huge crates of bottled water, and the tanker trucks, and everything else.If you can contain and/or properly treat this human waste, instead of leaving it to contaminate the water and spread disease, you are certainly taking steps in the right direction.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404282</id>
	<title>That will go over real well.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268081460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can just see the buzz on the street now... "they want me to pay every time I poop..."</p><p>I predict 0 adoption.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can just see the buzz on the street now... " they want me to pay every time I poop... " I predict 0 adoption .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can just see the buzz on the street now... "they want me to pay every time I poop..."I predict 0 adoption.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406684</id>
	<title>Re:The Humanure Handbook</title>
	<author>KnownIssues</author>
	<datestamp>1268047740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How does this guy think he's gonna make money on something that is patent and cost free? That's just insane! Ideas don't grow on trees, you know?!</htmltext>
<tokenext>How does this guy think he 's gon na make money on something that is patent and cost free ?
That 's just insane !
Ideas do n't grow on trees , you know ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does this guy think he's gonna make money on something that is patent and cost free?
That's just insane!
Ideas don't grow on trees, you know?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406956</id>
	<title>Re:How about California?</title>
	<author>witherstaff</author>
	<datestamp>1268048700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The bad press the last few years of multiple infected crops have changed farming practices a bit. In my immediate area - Michigan - they are enforcing these new rules rather harshly. Every field with workers has to have porta potties, designated eating areas, can't have outside food or even beverages outside of those areas. Want a drink of water? Fine, walk to the designated area and don't swig from a water bottle in the field. </p><p>
A local farmer last year was giving his mandated inspection tour - which costs a fee of course. While giving the tour he picked an apple off a tree and ate it. Instant fine for eating outside of the designated area. And people wonder why it's cheaper to ship apples from China, South America, etc than grow them locally. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The bad press the last few years of multiple infected crops have changed farming practices a bit .
In my immediate area - Michigan - they are enforcing these new rules rather harshly .
Every field with workers has to have porta potties , designated eating areas , ca n't have outside food or even beverages outside of those areas .
Want a drink of water ?
Fine , walk to the designated area and do n't swig from a water bottle in the field .
A local farmer last year was giving his mandated inspection tour - which costs a fee of course .
While giving the tour he picked an apple off a tree and ate it .
Instant fine for eating outside of the designated area .
And people wonder why it 's cheaper to ship apples from China , South America , etc than grow them locally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The bad press the last few years of multiple infected crops have changed farming practices a bit.
In my immediate area - Michigan - they are enforcing these new rules rather harshly.
Every field with workers has to have porta potties, designated eating areas, can't have outside food or even beverages outside of those areas.
Want a drink of water?
Fine, walk to the designated area and don't swig from a water bottle in the field.
A local farmer last year was giving his mandated inspection tour - which costs a fee of course.
While giving the tour he picked an apple off a tree and ate it.
Instant fine for eating outside of the designated area.
And people wonder why it's cheaper to ship apples from China, South America, etc than grow them locally. </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404236</id>
	<title>Perfect for those really long WoW raids.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268081280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>and here I am using a Mountain Dew bottle like a chump.</htmltext>
<tokenext>and here I am using a Mountain Dew bottle like a chump .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and here I am using a Mountain Dew bottle like a chump.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407384</id>
	<title>Re:The Humanure Handbook</title>
	<author>meyekul</author>
	<datestamp>1268050680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Great find, now everyone who can't afford a real toilet or the disposable toilet can just jump on their computers and download that PDF for free.  I wonder if they have a mailing list..</htmltext>
<tokenext>Great find , now everyone who ca n't afford a real toilet or the disposable toilet can just jump on their computers and download that PDF for free .
I wonder if they have a mailing list. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great find, now everyone who can't afford a real toilet or the disposable toilet can just jump on their computers and download that PDF for free.
I wonder if they have a mailing list..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408250</id>
	<title>Re:When you see it</title>
	<author>thomst</author>
	<datestamp>1268055540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You'll say, "Why, this is nothing but a bag of shit!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'll say , " Why , this is nothing but a bag of shit !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'll say, "Why, this is nothing but a bag of shit!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404494</id>
	<title>Finally get those kids off jenkem</title>
	<author>HalAtWork</author>
	<datestamp>1268039040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Finally, we can get those kids off <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenkem" title="wikipedia.org">jenkem</a> [wikipedia.org]!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , we can get those kids off jenkem [ wikipedia.org ] !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, we can get those kids off jenkem [wikipedia.org]!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405730</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>MobyDisk</author>
	<datestamp>1268044560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That didn't address the issue: poor peasants who can't afford toilets still live in urban areas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That did n't address the issue : poor peasants who ca n't afford toilets still live in urban areas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That didn't address the issue: poor peasants who can't afford toilets still live in urban areas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31424314</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they build themselves a sewer system</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268218380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, i'm Kenyan. We have more urgent needs than building a real sewer system.  I agree it,s not rocket science, and i agree the Romans did it over 2000 years ago using noth.............. We have to feed hungry people, resettle displaced people, give medication, take care of maternal health.......the list is endless before we think of real sewer system. But with time we will do it all. I know we will!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , i 'm Kenyan .
We have more urgent needs than building a real sewer system .
I agree it,s not rocket science , and i agree the Romans did it over 2000 years ago using noth.............. We have to feed hungry people , resettle displaced people , give medication , take care of maternal health.......the list is endless before we think of real sewer system .
But with time we will do it all .
I know we will !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, i'm Kenyan.
We have more urgent needs than building a real sewer system.
I agree it,s not rocket science, and i agree the Romans did it over 2000 years ago using noth.............. We have to feed hungry people, resettle displaced people, give medication, take care of maternal health.......the list is endless before we think of real sewer system.
But with time we will do it all.
I know we will!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404670</id>
	<title>Re:Perfect for those really long WoW raids.</title>
	<author>Rude Turnip</author>
	<datestamp>1268039700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You must have very slim movements.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You must have very slim movements .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must have very slim movements.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31411872</id>
	<title>Re:Shit provides both food and fuel</title>
	<author>Eclipse-now</author>
	<datestamp>1268139240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I'll just point out that by not doing this in the west, we are effectively extracting phosphorus, nitrogen and calcium from our fields and pumping it into rivers and oceans. We then burn a load of fuel to dig up more phosphorus and calcium elsewhere and burn natural gas to produce nitrates to put back on the fields. It's dumb.<i> <br> <br>
It's not only dumb, it's dangerous, as we are fast approaching peak phosphorus but it will take years to adapt our sewerage and agricultural systems around the new realities when peak phosphorous affects world phosphorus prices. One podcast I heard from the University of Technology, Sydney, Sustainable Future's Institute mentioned something like 25 years to really prepare for peak phosphorus. They recommended starting early because we're going to have to get the departments of waste to talk to the departments of agriculture, etc. Huge infrastructure changes coming!</i></i></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll just point out that by not doing this in the west , we are effectively extracting phosphorus , nitrogen and calcium from our fields and pumping it into rivers and oceans .
We then burn a load of fuel to dig up more phosphorus and calcium elsewhere and burn natural gas to produce nitrates to put back on the fields .
It 's dumb .
It 's not only dumb , it 's dangerous , as we are fast approaching peak phosphorus but it will take years to adapt our sewerage and agricultural systems around the new realities when peak phosphorous affects world phosphorus prices .
One podcast I heard from the University of Technology , Sydney , Sustainable Future 's Institute mentioned something like 25 years to really prepare for peak phosphorus .
They recommended starting early because we 're going to have to get the departments of waste to talk to the departments of agriculture , etc .
Huge infrastructure changes coming !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll just point out that by not doing this in the west, we are effectively extracting phosphorus, nitrogen and calcium from our fields and pumping it into rivers and oceans.
We then burn a load of fuel to dig up more phosphorus and calcium elsewhere and burn natural gas to produce nitrates to put back on the fields.
It's dumb.
It's not only dumb, it's dangerous, as we are fast approaching peak phosphorus but it will take years to adapt our sewerage and agricultural systems around the new realities when peak phosphorous affects world phosphorus prices.
One podcast I heard from the University of Technology, Sydney, Sustainable Future's Institute mentioned something like 25 years to really prepare for peak phosphorus.
They recommended starting early because we're going to have to get the departments of waste to talk to the departments of agriculture, etc.
Huge infrastructure changes coming!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404422</id>
	<title>Re:cost</title>
	<author>timeOday</author>
	<datestamp>1268038800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fertilizer costs money too, and increased crop yields mean more money and food.
<p>
It doesn't have to be free, it just has to pay for itself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fertilizer costs money too , and increased crop yields mean more money and food .
It does n't have to be free , it just has to pay for itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fertilizer costs money too, and increased crop yields mean more money and food.
It doesn't have to be free, it just has to pay for itself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406534</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>DragonWriter</author>
	<datestamp>1268047260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If you're a poor peasant living in some place where they don't even have toilets, can you really afford bags to poo in? Chances are food and fuel are more important to you.</p></div></blockquote><p>If you are a subsistence farmer -- as poor peasants tend to be -- a device that lets you turn otherwise-dangerous human waste into safe fertilizer <i>is</i>, in a sense, food. Or at least, a tool that directly contributes to your supply of food.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're a poor peasant living in some place where they do n't even have toilets , can you really afford bags to poo in ?
Chances are food and fuel are more important to you.If you are a subsistence farmer -- as poor peasants tend to be -- a device that lets you turn otherwise-dangerous human waste into safe fertilizer is , in a sense , food .
Or at least , a tool that directly contributes to your supply of food .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're a poor peasant living in some place where they don't even have toilets, can you really afford bags to poo in?
Chances are food and fuel are more important to you.If you are a subsistence farmer -- as poor peasants tend to be -- a device that lets you turn otherwise-dangerous human waste into safe fertilizer is, in a sense, food.
Or at least, a tool that directly contributes to your supply of food.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406520</id>
	<title>Re:When you see it</title>
	<author>tronkel</author>
	<datestamp>1268047200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The government could get tax revenue from this idea if they can manage to convert the bag contents to beer instead.
Could fund the whole Medicare system</htmltext>
<tokenext>The government could get tax revenue from this idea if they can manage to convert the bag contents to beer instead .
Could fund the whole Medicare system</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The government could get tax revenue from this idea if they can manage to convert the bag contents to beer instead.
Could fund the whole Medicare system</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31414472</id>
	<title>Re:How about California?</title>
	<author>NevarMore</author>
	<datestamp>1268153520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're out in a field and the shitter is a 10 minute walk and you step away from the job to go, you're not doing a good job. Find nearby cover and go. You  don't go right on the plants anyway, it splashes back.</p><p>This has nothing to do with "illegals" its SOP for farmers, landscapers, greenskeepers, loggers, woodsmen, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're out in a field and the shitter is a 10 minute walk and you step away from the job to go , you 're not doing a good job .
Find nearby cover and go .
You do n't go right on the plants anyway , it splashes back.This has nothing to do with " illegals " its SOP for farmers , landscapers , greenskeepers , loggers , woodsmen , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're out in a field and the shitter is a 10 minute walk and you step away from the job to go, you're not doing a good job.
Find nearby cover and go.
You  don't go right on the plants anyway, it splashes back.This has nothing to do with "illegals" its SOP for farmers, landscapers, greenskeepers, loggers, woodsmen, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405240</id>
	<title>Re:Yes but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268042580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks to Dr. Brown, at 88mph the excrement travels back in time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks to Dr. Brown , at 88mph the excrement travels back in time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks to Dr. Brown, at 88mph the excrement travels back in time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404432</id>
	<title>*Sniff Sniff*</title>
	<author>derekg52</author>
	<datestamp>1268038800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I call bullshit.</p><p>Bonus: Captcha = excretes</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I call bullshit.Bonus : Captcha = excretes</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I call bullshit.Bonus: Captcha = excretes</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409212</id>
	<title>Re:From a practical standpoint,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268062740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>is the bag flammable?</p></div><p>That would create one flaming shitstorm...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>is the bag flammable ? That would create one flaming shitstorm.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is the bag flammable?That would create one flaming shitstorm...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404250</id>
	<title>Something</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268081340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>about this story stinks</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>about this story stinks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>about this story stinks</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404180</id>
	<title>The guy creates a brilliant solution...</title>
	<author>calibre-not-output</author>
	<datestamp>1268081100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>...and goes on to give it a name that five-year-olds everywhere can laugh at until they piss themselves. Presumably that's how he'll collect the urea crystals.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and goes on to give it a name that five-year-olds everywhere can laugh at until they piss themselves .
Presumably that 's how he 'll collect the urea crystals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and goes on to give it a name that five-year-olds everywhere can laugh at until they piss themselves.
Presumably that's how he'll collect the urea crystals.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407084</id>
	<title>Re:Perfect for those really long WoW raids.</title>
	<author>bughunter</author>
	<datestamp>1268049240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yea, the real hardcore raiders use socks.  Only casuals use Dew bottles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea , the real hardcore raiders use socks .
Only casuals use Dew bottles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea, the real hardcore raiders use socks.
Only casuals use Dew bottles.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404236</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404532</id>
	<title>Re:But does it run Linux?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268039220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But does it run Linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But does it run Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But does it run Linux?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409012</id>
	<title>May not be suitable for aircraft transportation...</title>
	<author>commport1</author>
	<datestamp>1268061000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hang on, didn't terrorists use Fertilizer as one of the two major components in the 1993 Oklahoma city bombings?

I smell a rat.....(or is it something else?)...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hang on , did n't terrorists use Fertilizer as one of the two major components in the 1993 Oklahoma city bombings ?
I smell a rat..... ( or is it something else ?
) .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hang on, didn't terrorists use Fertilizer as one of the two major components in the 1993 Oklahoma city bombings?
I smell a rat.....(or is it something else?
)...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404274</id>
	<title>finish them!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268081400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nuclear weapons would be a better solution</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nuclear weapons would be a better solution</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nuclear weapons would be a better solution</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405932</id>
	<title>Re:cost</title>
	<author>BlackHawk-666</author>
	<datestamp>1268045400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But in India people live on the rubbish dumps and pick up then recycle the plastic bags because they are so poor. We're now expecting them to pay that cost every time they need a dump?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But in India people live on the rubbish dumps and pick up then recycle the plastic bags because they are so poor .
We 're now expecting them to pay that cost every time they need a dump ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But in India people live on the rubbish dumps and pick up then recycle the plastic bags because they are so poor.
We're now expecting them to pay that cost every time they need a dump?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404350</id>
	<title>Peepoo?</title>
	<author>dcmoebius</author>
	<datestamp>1268081700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a bit on the nose, isn't it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a bit on the nose , is n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a bit on the nose, isn't it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407308</id>
	<title>Re:How about California?</title>
	<author>phantomfive</author>
	<datestamp>1268050260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In three years working in the fields of California with Mexicans, I never saw this behavior. Not saying it doesn't happen, but it doesn't happen all the time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In three years working in the fields of California with Mexicans , I never saw this behavior .
Not saying it does n't happen , but it does n't happen all the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In three years working in the fields of California with Mexicans, I never saw this behavior.
Not saying it doesn't happen, but it doesn't happen all the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31415670</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps a buy one donate several model?</title>
	<author>gawaino</author>
	<datestamp>1268157780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Use as pet waste bags? People in first-world countries spend a lot of time and money cleaning up after dogs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Use as pet waste bags ?
People in first-world countries spend a lot of time and money cleaning up after dogs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Use as pet waste bags?
People in first-world countries spend a lot of time and money cleaning up after dogs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404886</id>
	<title>From a practical standpoint,</title>
	<author>vandelais</author>
	<datestamp>1268040840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is the bag flammable?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is the bag flammable ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is the bag flammable?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408504</id>
	<title>This will be *mandatory* ...</title>
	<author>jabberwock</author>
	<datestamp>1268057100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... for New York City dog owners before it's even tested in Africa.

 How could the inventor not have realized that the most lucrative market for this is dog owners in cities?</htmltext>
<tokenext>... for New York City dog owners before it 's even tested in Africa .
How could the inventor not have realized that the most lucrative market for this is dog owners in cities ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... for New York City dog owners before it's even tested in Africa.
How could the inventor not have realized that the most lucrative market for this is dog owners in cities?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408484</id>
	<title>Brilliant</title>
	<author>pubwvj</author>
	<datestamp>1268056920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is an incredibly brilliant idea for Wilhelmson to make money! Wow! Poop and pay him. Meanwhile, the bear will continue to shit in the woods. Some people are so hung up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is an incredibly brilliant idea for Wilhelmson to make money !
Wow ! Poop and pay him .
Meanwhile , the bear will continue to shit in the woods .
Some people are so hung up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is an incredibly brilliant idea for Wilhelmson to make money!
Wow! Poop and pay him.
Meanwhile, the bear will continue to shit in the woods.
Some people are so hung up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406132</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268046000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're a poor peasant living in some place where they don't even have toilets, do you really CARE? Having lived in Africa for many years, I can tell you for most of these people, the answer is almost certainly no. Throughout history they have urinated and defecated behind some convenient bush. Giving them bags to poop in will likely get you a blank stare at best, more likely an incredulous 'you want me to do WHAT in here and put it where?'</p><p>Also, are they going to provide them with shovels to bury the bags too?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're a poor peasant living in some place where they do n't even have toilets , do you really CARE ?
Having lived in Africa for many years , I can tell you for most of these people , the answer is almost certainly no .
Throughout history they have urinated and defecated behind some convenient bush .
Giving them bags to poop in will likely get you a blank stare at best , more likely an incredulous 'you want me to do WHAT in here and put it where ?
'Also , are they going to provide them with shovels to bury the bags too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're a poor peasant living in some place where they don't even have toilets, do you really CARE?
Having lived in Africa for many years, I can tell you for most of these people, the answer is almost certainly no.
Throughout history they have urinated and defecated behind some convenient bush.
Giving them bags to poop in will likely get you a blank stare at best, more likely an incredulous 'you want me to do WHAT in here and put it where?
'Also, are they going to provide them with shovels to bury the bags too?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404828</id>
	<title>Infrastructure is a target</title>
	<author>wurp</author>
	<datestamp>1268040600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In an area where the political system turns over every couple of years, investments are targets, including infrastructure.  When trying to control a group, ruining something they invested a lot of time in and need for day to day life is a very effective threat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In an area where the political system turns over every couple of years , investments are targets , including infrastructure .
When trying to control a group , ruining something they invested a lot of time in and need for day to day life is a very effective threat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In an area where the political system turns over every couple of years, investments are targets, including infrastructure.
When trying to control a group, ruining something they invested a lot of time in and need for day to day life is a very effective threat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409746</id>
	<title>Of all the possible names...</title>
	<author>Faerunner</author>
	<datestamp>1268067720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...to refer to a sack of sh!t, they had to use PeePoo? Third graders will get a real kick out of it, at least...

<br> <br>Just off the top of my head: Humanure (if it's not already patented), Green Latrine, Peecomposition, PissOff (contributed by my fiance), WasteAway, BuryIt, Poo4U, Re-Cycle, Poo-rify (purify), etc. I'm sure someone else can come up with better, too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...to refer to a sack of sh ! t , they had to use PeePoo ?
Third graders will get a real kick out of it , at least.. . Just off the top of my head : Humanure ( if it 's not already patented ) , Green Latrine , Peecomposition , PissOff ( contributed by my fiance ) , WasteAway , BuryIt , Poo4U , Re-Cycle , Poo-rify ( purify ) , etc .
I 'm sure someone else can come up with better , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...to refer to a sack of sh!t, they had to use PeePoo?
Third graders will get a real kick out of it, at least...

 Just off the top of my head: Humanure (if it's not already patented), Green Latrine, Peecomposition, PissOff (contributed by my fiance), WasteAway, BuryIt, Poo4U, Re-Cycle, Poo-rify (purify), etc.
I'm sure someone else can come up with better, too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404398</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1268081880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Saying that "don't worth a crap" gives a hint of how much it should cost to think that it could change the world.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Saying that " do n't worth a crap " gives a hint of how much it should cost to think that it could change the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Saying that "don't worth a crap" gives a hint of how much it should cost to think that it could change the world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404656</id>
	<title>Overkill for pee</title>
	<author>srussia</author>
	<datestamp>1268039640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From TFA:<i>  'Once used, the bag can be knotted and buried, and a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer, killing off disease-producing pathogens found in feces.</i>
<br> <br>

If you pee when you poo, then this is superfluous as pee already contains urea.</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : 'Once used , the bag can be knotted and buried , and a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer , killing off disease-producing pathogens found in feces .
If you pee when you poo , then this is superfluous as pee already contains urea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA:  'Once used, the bag can be knotted and buried, and a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer, killing off disease-producing pathogens found in feces.
If you pee when you poo, then this is superfluous as pee already contains urea.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405028</id>
	<title>Better idea</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1268041620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Instead of giving them things to poop in, give them something that will help solve their real problems: Population.  Give them condoms, IUDs, birth control patches, free vasectomies and tubal ligations.  After about 30 years their problems will be MUCH more solvable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Instead of giving them things to poop in , give them something that will help solve their real problems : Population .
Give them condoms , IUDs , birth control patches , free vasectomies and tubal ligations .
After about 30 years their problems will be MUCH more solvable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Instead of giving them things to poop in, give them something that will help solve their real problems: Population.
Give them condoms, IUDs, birth control patches, free vasectomies and tubal ligations.
After about 30 years their problems will be MUCH more solvable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406786</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmm....</title>
	<author>Hillgiant</author>
	<datestamp>1268048040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sadly, there seem to be more Worthless Sacks of Shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly , there seem to be more Worthless Sacks of Shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly, there seem to be more Worthless Sacks of Shit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404914</id>
	<title>Could also be used after earthquakes or tornadoes</title>
	<author>Rick17JJ</author>
	<datestamp>1268040900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The disposable toilets could also be used after disasters such as earthquakes, floods, hurricanes or tornadoes. It also might be useful for homeowners to use during a several day long power outage after a wind storm or an ice storm. It would be an alternative to grabbing a shovel and going in the back yard or on undeveloped land nearby.<br><br>Baby wipes or similar disposable disinfectant wipes could be used to clean the person's hands afterwards, if no working water faucet is available.  I sometimes use a baby wipe for my hands after using a Clivus Multrum composting toilet or an old pit toilet in the national forest, where no running water is available. I usually keep several in my day pack when hiking, just in case.  The baby wipes could also be used on overnight backpacking trips when camping where no running water is available.<br><br>As a child, I remember visiting a several older relatives such as my grandparents, who had an outhouse on each of their farms. Grandpa's was a three hole outhouse. If I remember correctly, they had a small bucket of lime and would sometimes sprinkle a little over the poop.  There was also some corn cobs and an old Sears catalog, just in case they ever ran out of toilet paper.  If I am not mistaken, the corn cob is supposed to be used together with a page from the Sears catalog. As a child, I also enjoyed using the hand operated pump for pumping water from the well.<br><br>Of course they did also have one toilet and running water in the house, but as a child I found it more interesting to use the outhouse and the hand pumped well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The disposable toilets could also be used after disasters such as earthquakes , floods , hurricanes or tornadoes .
It also might be useful for homeowners to use during a several day long power outage after a wind storm or an ice storm .
It would be an alternative to grabbing a shovel and going in the back yard or on undeveloped land nearby.Baby wipes or similar disposable disinfectant wipes could be used to clean the person 's hands afterwards , if no working water faucet is available .
I sometimes use a baby wipe for my hands after using a Clivus Multrum composting toilet or an old pit toilet in the national forest , where no running water is available .
I usually keep several in my day pack when hiking , just in case .
The baby wipes could also be used on overnight backpacking trips when camping where no running water is available.As a child , I remember visiting a several older relatives such as my grandparents , who had an outhouse on each of their farms .
Grandpa 's was a three hole outhouse .
If I remember correctly , they had a small bucket of lime and would sometimes sprinkle a little over the poop .
There was also some corn cobs and an old Sears catalog , just in case they ever ran out of toilet paper .
If I am not mistaken , the corn cob is supposed to be used together with a page from the Sears catalog .
As a child , I also enjoyed using the hand operated pump for pumping water from the well.Of course they did also have one toilet and running water in the house , but as a child I found it more interesting to use the outhouse and the hand pumped well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The disposable toilets could also be used after disasters such as earthquakes, floods, hurricanes or tornadoes.
It also might be useful for homeowners to use during a several day long power outage after a wind storm or an ice storm.
It would be an alternative to grabbing a shovel and going in the back yard or on undeveloped land nearby.Baby wipes or similar disposable disinfectant wipes could be used to clean the person's hands afterwards, if no working water faucet is available.
I sometimes use a baby wipe for my hands after using a Clivus Multrum composting toilet or an old pit toilet in the national forest, where no running water is available.
I usually keep several in my day pack when hiking, just in case.
The baby wipes could also be used on overnight backpacking trips when camping where no running water is available.As a child, I remember visiting a several older relatives such as my grandparents, who had an outhouse on each of their farms.
Grandpa's was a three hole outhouse.
If I remember correctly, they had a small bucket of lime and would sometimes sprinkle a little over the poop.
There was also some corn cobs and an old Sears catalog, just in case they ever ran out of toilet paper.
If I am not mistaken, the corn cob is supposed to be used together with a page from the Sears catalog.
As a child, I also enjoyed using the hand operated pump for pumping water from the well.Of course they did also have one toilet and running water in the house, but as a child I found it more interesting to use the outhouse and the hand pumped well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31414420</id>
	<title>Ancient Romans</title>
	<author>srobert</author>
	<datestamp>1268153340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The ancient Romans were smarter than we are. At least they were, until they started drinking water from those lead pipes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The ancient Romans were smarter than we are .
At least they were , until they started drinking water from those lead pipes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The ancient Romans were smarter than we are.
At least they were, until they started drinking water from those lead pipes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406506</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmm....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268047200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's a brilliant marketing idea: label them as "Shit Bags" (when empty), with color changing ink to say "Sack of Shit" (when full).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's a brilliant marketing idea : label them as " Shit Bags " ( when empty ) , with color changing ink to say " Sack of Shit " ( when full ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's a brilliant marketing idea: label them as "Shit Bags" (when empty), with color changing ink to say "Sack of Shit" (when full).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31411696</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>daem0n1x</author>
	<datestamp>1268136660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Against my principles, I have to reply an AC. Be a man and use your account!
</p><p>
Dude, it's hard to "industrialise" when you're too busy dying from dysentery, pneumonia, meningitis, tuberculosis, hepatitis, tetanus, cholera, malaria, etc. It's hard to keep a factory working when half your employees have chronic diseases and acute infections kill someone every month or so.
</p><p>
All the diseases listed above are hygiene related. You don't get to see them in your fancy suburb, but in the third world they are commonplace.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Against my principles , I have to reply an AC .
Be a man and use your account !
Dude , it 's hard to " industrialise " when you 're too busy dying from dysentery , pneumonia , meningitis , tuberculosis , hepatitis , tetanus , cholera , malaria , etc .
It 's hard to keep a factory working when half your employees have chronic diseases and acute infections kill someone every month or so .
All the diseases listed above are hygiene related .
You do n't get to see them in your fancy suburb , but in the third world they are commonplace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Against my principles, I have to reply an AC.
Be a man and use your account!
Dude, it's hard to "industrialise" when you're too busy dying from dysentery, pneumonia, meningitis, tuberculosis, hepatitis, tetanus, cholera, malaria, etc.
It's hard to keep a factory working when half your employees have chronic diseases and acute infections kill someone every month or so.
All the diseases listed above are hygiene related.
You don't get to see them in your fancy suburb, but in the third world they are commonplace.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404246</id>
	<title>cost</title>
	<author>Lord Ender</author>
	<datestamp>1268081340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The most important factor is cost. It will have to be fantastically cheap to manufacture and distribute this if you want to sell it to people who subsist on $0.10 of rice per day. People who are used to flinging poo out the windows of their shacks will probably be perplexed by the idea of paying to take a dump.</p><p>And yes, I have dodged chamber pots in India. Prepare to be depressed if you ever visit the third world<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The most important factor is cost .
It will have to be fantastically cheap to manufacture and distribute this if you want to sell it to people who subsist on $ 0.10 of rice per day .
People who are used to flinging poo out the windows of their shacks will probably be perplexed by the idea of paying to take a dump.And yes , I have dodged chamber pots in India .
Prepare to be depressed if you ever visit the third world : -/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The most important factor is cost.
It will have to be fantastically cheap to manufacture and distribute this if you want to sell it to people who subsist on $0.10 of rice per day.
People who are used to flinging poo out the windows of their shacks will probably be perplexed by the idea of paying to take a dump.And yes, I have dodged chamber pots in India.
Prepare to be depressed if you ever visit the third world :-/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404346</id>
	<title>I think it's a nice solution</title>
	<author>cyberzephyr</author>
	<datestamp>1268081700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm really glad to see that someone found a way to make human waste safe for crops.</p><p> That has been a big issue in general for farmers in countries where there are less than adequate water safety facilities.</p><p> It's hard to afford fertilizer in war-torn or otherwise de-stabilized countries when you have a bunch of kids to feed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm really glad to see that someone found a way to make human waste safe for crops .
That has been a big issue in general for farmers in countries where there are less than adequate water safety facilities .
It 's hard to afford fertilizer in war-torn or otherwise de-stabilized countries when you have a bunch of kids to feed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm really glad to see that someone found a way to make human waste safe for crops.
That has been a big issue in general for farmers in countries where there are less than adequate water safety facilities.
It's hard to afford fertilizer in war-torn or otherwise de-stabilized countries when you have a bunch of kids to feed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409536</id>
	<title>The Third World is notoriously lacking doorbells.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268065560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So you can't light one, ring, and then run.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you ca n't light one , ring , and then run .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you can't light one, ring, and then run.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31414106</id>
	<title>Re:Not to be a naysayer, but can people afford thi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268152080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer'.  Isnt there a readily available source of urea that doesnt have to be purchased?  Does poo not turn to fertilizer if pee poo was just done in a hole and covered??  Am I missing something here?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer' .
Isnt there a readily available source of urea that doesnt have to be purchased ?
Does poo not turn to fertilizer if pee poo was just done in a hole and covered ? ?
Am I missing something here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'a layer of urea crystals breaks down the waste into fertilizer'.
Isnt there a readily available source of urea that doesnt have to be purchased?
Does poo not turn to fertilizer if pee poo was just done in a hole and covered??
Am I missing something here?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404772</id>
	<title>Re:Don't they even own a shovel?</title>
	<author>h4rr4r</author>
	<datestamp>1268040300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Urea, hmm were else is that found, hmm.</p><p>Oh I know, urine. All we need to do is get them to shit and piss in the same latrine, or were you thinking they would use a seperate one for each?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Urea , hmm were else is that found , hmm.Oh I know , urine .
All we need to do is get them to shit and piss in the same latrine , or were you thinking they would use a seperate one for each ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Urea, hmm were else is that found, hmm.Oh I know, urine.
All we need to do is get them to shit and piss in the same latrine, or were you thinking they would use a seperate one for each?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405528</id>
	<title>Re:Don't they even own a shovel?</title>
	<author>zero\_out</author>
	<datestamp>1268043720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Some people even believe that the moon landing was faked, and that the U.S. government caused the 2001 WTC attacks.</p></div><p>I meant to say, "...and that the U.S. government faked the 2001 WTC attacks."</p><p>Whether or not the U.S. government caused the attacks is debatable, depending on one's subjective definition of the word "caused," and one's view of culpability.   Since I do not want to start an offtopic debate, I am correcting that sentence.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some people even believe that the moon landing was faked , and that the U.S. government caused the 2001 WTC attacks.I meant to say , " ...and that the U.S. government faked the 2001 WTC attacks .
" Whether or not the U.S. government caused the attacks is debatable , depending on one 's subjective definition of the word " caused , " and one 's view of culpability .
Since I do not want to start an offtopic debate , I am correcting that sentence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some people even believe that the moon landing was faked, and that the U.S. government caused the 2001 WTC attacks.I meant to say, "...and that the U.S. government faked the 2001 WTC attacks.
"Whether or not the U.S. government caused the attacks is debatable, depending on one's subjective definition of the word "caused," and one's view of culpability.
Since I do not want to start an offtopic debate, I am correcting that sentence.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404594</id>
	<title>Re:Don't they even own a shovel?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268039400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know why, but in many parts of India, the government needs to pay people to use a toilet.  Even when the government supplies a deluxe porta-potty, the likes of which you can only find at a multi-millionaire rapper's BBQ, the people simply won't use it.  I don't know if it's a cultural taboo, or that squatting on the side of the street is believed to be cleaner or easier, but the people just won't use them.  I wonder if this bag would be useful in that kind of situation, or if the people just wouldn't use it either.</p><p>Remember, we live in a world where many Africans believe that having intercourse with a virgin will cure HIV.  Then there are some cultures that punish women with floggings, execution, or even immolation, for having the audacity to be raped.  Men are killed for wearing shorts, and lesbians are raped in an effort to cure them.  Some people even believe that the moon landing was faked, and that the U.S. government caused the 2001 WTC attacks.</p><p>Even if people own a shovel, many simply won't use it because they're too lazy, or too stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know why , but in many parts of India , the government needs to pay people to use a toilet .
Even when the government supplies a deluxe porta-potty , the likes of which you can only find at a multi-millionaire rapper 's BBQ , the people simply wo n't use it .
I do n't know if it 's a cultural taboo , or that squatting on the side of the street is believed to be cleaner or easier , but the people just wo n't use them .
I wonder if this bag would be useful in that kind of situation , or if the people just would n't use it either.Remember , we live in a world where many Africans believe that having intercourse with a virgin will cure HIV .
Then there are some cultures that punish women with floggings , execution , or even immolation , for having the audacity to be raped .
Men are killed for wearing shorts , and lesbians are raped in an effort to cure them .
Some people even believe that the moon landing was faked , and that the U.S. government caused the 2001 WTC attacks.Even if people own a shovel , many simply wo n't use it because they 're too lazy , or too stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know why, but in many parts of India, the government needs to pay people to use a toilet.
Even when the government supplies a deluxe porta-potty, the likes of which you can only find at a multi-millionaire rapper's BBQ, the people simply won't use it.
I don't know if it's a cultural taboo, or that squatting on the side of the street is believed to be cleaner or easier, but the people just won't use them.
I wonder if this bag would be useful in that kind of situation, or if the people just wouldn't use it either.Remember, we live in a world where many Africans believe that having intercourse with a virgin will cure HIV.
Then there are some cultures that punish women with floggings, execution, or even immolation, for having the audacity to be raped.
Men are killed for wearing shorts, and lesbians are raped in an effort to cure them.
Some people even believe that the moon landing was faked, and that the U.S. government caused the 2001 WTC attacks.Even if people own a shovel, many simply won't use it because they're too lazy, or too stupid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404126</id>
	<title>When you see it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268080800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You'll sh*t bricks!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'll sh * t bricks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'll sh*t bricks!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409304</id>
	<title>vermiculture is also a good alternative</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268063640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>black soldier fly (SF), Hermetia illucens, makes fertilizer fast, and its food, cleanest fly ever!!!</p><p><a href="http://www.esrla.com/" title="esrla.com" rel="nofollow">Engineering, Separation and Recycling LLC</a> [esrla.com] </p><blockquote><div><p>This tropical fly larva<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...  digests putrescent waste at the standard rate of roughly 15 kgs per square meter of unit surface per day.</p></div></blockquote><p><a href="http://thebiopod.com/" title="thebiopod.com" rel="nofollow">Prota(TM)Culture &amp; The BioPod(TM) - Advanced Composting Using Black Soldier Fly: The Future of Food Waste Diversion &amp; Recycling</a> [thebiopod.com] </p><blockquote><div><p>A working  BioPod(TM) can easily handle the daily food scraps produced by a large family - up to 5 lbs per day. It can even digest pet feces. For every 100 lbs of kitchen scraps you will get 5 lbs of friable compost, a few quarts of nutritious compost tea, and approx. 20 lbs of self-harvesting grubs - which are the freshest fish, herp, and bird food.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>black soldier fly ( SF ) , Hermetia illucens , makes fertilizer fast , and its food , cleanest fly ever ! !
! Engineering , Separation and Recycling LLC [ esrla.com ] This tropical fly larva ... digests putrescent waste at the standard rate of roughly 15 kgs per square meter of unit surface per day.Prota ( TM ) Culture &amp; The BioPod ( TM ) - Advanced Composting Using Black Soldier Fly : The Future of Food Waste Diversion &amp; Recycling [ thebiopod.com ] A working BioPod ( TM ) can easily handle the daily food scraps produced by a large family - up to 5 lbs per day .
It can even digest pet feces .
For every 100 lbs of kitchen scraps you will get 5 lbs of friable compost , a few quarts of nutritious compost tea , and approx .
20 lbs of self-harvesting grubs - which are the freshest fish , herp , and bird food .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>black soldier fly (SF), Hermetia illucens, makes fertilizer fast, and its food, cleanest fly ever!!
!Engineering, Separation and Recycling LLC [esrla.com] This tropical fly larva ...  digests putrescent waste at the standard rate of roughly 15 kgs per square meter of unit surface per day.Prota(TM)Culture &amp; The BioPod(TM) - Advanced Composting Using Black Soldier Fly: The Future of Food Waste Diversion &amp; Recycling [thebiopod.com] A working  BioPod(TM) can easily handle the daily food scraps produced by a large family - up to 5 lbs per day.
It can even digest pet feces.
For every 100 lbs of kitchen scraps you will get 5 lbs of friable compost, a few quarts of nutritious compost tea, and approx.
20 lbs of self-harvesting grubs - which are the freshest fish, herp, and bird food.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406590</id>
	<title>Re:Don't they even own a shovel?</title>
	<author>misexistentialist</author>
	<datestamp>1268047440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you are well-practiced, squatting on the side of the road is indeed likely to be cleaner than using a facility shared with hundreds of people...at least until the side of the road is filled with shit. Many times have I wished to avoid public bathrooms, and would certainly gone in the fresh air if I could feel comfortable. Porta-potties, no matter how fancy, are coffins that are always on the verge of tipping over into a nightmare.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you are well-practiced , squatting on the side of the road is indeed likely to be cleaner than using a facility shared with hundreds of people...at least until the side of the road is filled with shit .
Many times have I wished to avoid public bathrooms , and would certainly gone in the fresh air if I could feel comfortable .
Porta-potties , no matter how fancy , are coffins that are always on the verge of tipping over into a nightmare .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you are well-practiced, squatting on the side of the road is indeed likely to be cleaner than using a facility shared with hundreds of people...at least until the side of the road is filled with shit.
Many times have I wished to avoid public bathrooms, and would certainly gone in the fresh air if I could feel comfortable.
Porta-potties, no matter how fancy, are coffins that are always on the verge of tipping over into a nightmare.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405042</id>
	<title>Re:Yes but...</title>
	<author>fahrbot-bot</author>
	<datestamp>1268041680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>...can you use it while driving 90mph?</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Is that you <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa\_Nowak" title="wikipedia.org">Lisa Nowak</a> [wikipedia.org]?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...can you use it while driving 90mph ?
Is that you Lisa Nowak [ wikipedia.org ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...can you use it while driving 90mph?
Is that you Lisa Nowak [wikipedia.org]?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404490</id>
	<title>Re:Don't they even own a shovel?</title>
	<author>confused one</author>
	<datestamp>1268039040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>He based the idea on an existing observed behaviour.  But he's using a bio-degradeable bag instead of a polyethylene bag.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He based the idea on an existing observed behaviour .
But he 's using a bio-degradeable bag instead of a polyethylene bag .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He based the idea on an existing observed behaviour.
But he's using a bio-degradeable bag instead of a polyethylene bag.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407174</id>
	<title>Better than a stream, ditch or bush?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268049540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would people who are comfortable with their present methods switch to another that costs them a portion of their daily food ration?  I applaud the fellow for trying to solve the plight of the third-world but, the only place this would be accepted and have utility--were it actually legal to do so--would be in the developed world where access to ordinary means of doing your business are unavailable.</p><p>If the first-world truly cared to solve the problems of such people we would be intelligently investing in their education and infrastructure (hiring predominantly local labor) not dumping our surplus food stuffs onto their markets thereby robbing the farmers of their livelyhood.  Moreover, we would provide the training and tools necessary for their farmers to meet our standards of wholesomeness to permit access to our markets.  We would also stop raping their lands of natural resources with out fair compensation to the people in forms useful to them (see above) rather than a handful of autocrats to finance their petty wars.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would people who are comfortable with their present methods switch to another that costs them a portion of their daily food ration ?
I applaud the fellow for trying to solve the plight of the third-world but , the only place this would be accepted and have utility--were it actually legal to do so--would be in the developed world where access to ordinary means of doing your business are unavailable.If the first-world truly cared to solve the problems of such people we would be intelligently investing in their education and infrastructure ( hiring predominantly local labor ) not dumping our surplus food stuffs onto their markets thereby robbing the farmers of their livelyhood .
Moreover , we would provide the training and tools necessary for their farmers to meet our standards of wholesomeness to permit access to our markets .
We would also stop raping their lands of natural resources with out fair compensation to the people in forms useful to them ( see above ) rather than a handful of autocrats to finance their petty wars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would people who are comfortable with their present methods switch to another that costs them a portion of their daily food ration?
I applaud the fellow for trying to solve the plight of the third-world but, the only place this would be accepted and have utility--were it actually legal to do so--would be in the developed world where access to ordinary means of doing your business are unavailable.If the first-world truly cared to solve the problems of such people we would be intelligently investing in their education and infrastructure (hiring predominantly local labor) not dumping our surplus food stuffs onto their markets thereby robbing the farmers of their livelyhood.
Moreover, we would provide the training and tools necessary for their farmers to meet our standards of wholesomeness to permit access to our markets.
We would also stop raping their lands of natural resources with out fair compensation to the people in forms useful to them (see above) rather than a handful of autocrats to finance their petty wars.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31414472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31410152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406534
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406132
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406604
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404712
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31415670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31410926
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405578
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31411872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405294
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408166
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404554
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31421552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31414106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31411696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31424314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404532
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404902
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31520190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407048
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31414420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404664
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409336
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31411084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404828
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405528
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406270
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31411760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31411324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31412872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_08_1524235_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1524235.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31424314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31520190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404902
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31411084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31414420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405578
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406268
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404710
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31421552
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404712
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1524235.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407096
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1524235.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404236
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404964
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1524235.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404914
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1524235.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31415670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405924
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1524235.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405270
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405294
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407430
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1524235.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405240
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1524235.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406270
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1524235.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404278
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1524235.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409304
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1524235.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404282
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1524235.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406520
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404824
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404532
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1524235.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407174
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1524235.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404246
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404422
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404430
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409478
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405932
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404434
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404396
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409336
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1524235.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404242
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404980
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409182
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31410926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405526
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1524235.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404444
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408974
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405730
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404548
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31414106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406132
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404648
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31411872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404606
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31411696
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404592
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407002
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31412872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405280
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409108
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408470
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407048
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406956
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31414472
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31407308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404554
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1524235.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31409212
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1524235.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404594
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406492
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406590
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405528
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31411324
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405766
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31408612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404362
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31406974
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404772
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31410152
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404720
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1524235.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31405028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31411760
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_08_1524235.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_08_1524235.31404494
</commentlist>
</conversation>
