<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_06_2250252</id>
	<title>Some Newegg Customers Received Fake Intel Core i7s</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1267873080000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Several readers have mentioned the strange goods that some customers received from Newegg <a href="http://www.overclockers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=636484">in place of the Intel Core i7 920 processor they ordered</a>. Word on the problem <a href="http://www.tribalwar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=606966">first surfaced on TribalWar</a> on Thursday evening. Newegg still hasn't commented on this. It's not known whether it happened as a result fraud by another Newegg customer, in shipping, or where. The "processors" are made of aluminum, and the "fans" are some kind of synthetic molded material. The "factory seal" was printed onto the box; the holographic stickers on the boxes were also faked. The first part of this video shows <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDU7Xoju4LM">the bogus goods</a>. At this writing Google News lists a <a href="http://news.google.com/news/more?pz=1&amp;cf=all&amp;ned=us&amp;cf=all&amp;ncl=dLOYWVv2dELjXFM8EnaRe57bZupbM">handful of blogs</a> mentioning the fakes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Several readers have mentioned the strange goods that some customers received from Newegg in place of the Intel Core i7 920 processor they ordered .
Word on the problem first surfaced on TribalWar on Thursday evening .
Newegg still has n't commented on this .
It 's not known whether it happened as a result fraud by another Newegg customer , in shipping , or where .
The " processors " are made of aluminum , and the " fans " are some kind of synthetic molded material .
The " factory seal " was printed onto the box ; the holographic stickers on the boxes were also faked .
The first part of this video shows the bogus goods .
At this writing Google News lists a handful of blogs mentioning the fakes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Several readers have mentioned the strange goods that some customers received from Newegg in place of the Intel Core i7 920 processor they ordered.
Word on the problem first surfaced on TribalWar on Thursday evening.
Newegg still hasn't commented on this.
It's not known whether it happened as a result fraud by another Newegg customer, in shipping, or where.
The "processors" are made of aluminum, and the "fans" are some kind of synthetic molded material.
The "factory seal" was printed onto the box; the holographic stickers on the boxes were also faked.
The first part of this video shows the bogus goods.
At this writing Google News lists a handful of blogs mentioning the fakes.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386828</id>
	<title>Re:Please Don't Restock This!</title>
	<author>dr\_dank</author>
	<datestamp>1267900920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>one was a non-combination arc-fault circuit breaker instead of the combination arc-fault model now required by electrical codes</i></p><p>You fell for the old "non-combination arc-fault circuit breaker instead of the combination arc-fault" trick?</p><p>Everybody laugh!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>one was a non-combination arc-fault circuit breaker instead of the combination arc-fault model now required by electrical codesYou fell for the old " non-combination arc-fault circuit breaker instead of the combination arc-fault " trick ? Everybody laugh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>one was a non-combination arc-fault circuit breaker instead of the combination arc-fault model now required by electrical codesYou fell for the old "non-combination arc-fault circuit breaker instead of the combination arc-fault" trick?Everybody laugh!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385708</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384990</id>
	<title>Re:easy way to tell a fake</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267882620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously though, the easiest way to spot an asian knockoff is if the chip is stamped "Intrel".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously though , the easiest way to spot an asian knockoff is if the chip is stamped " Intrel " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously though, the easiest way to spot an asian knockoff is if the chip is stamped "Intrel".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31391318</id>
	<title>Re:Not buying Neweggs explanation</title>
	<author>DedTV</author>
	<datestamp>1267985760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It makes a lot more sense that these were units made to be used internally as mock ups than it does that someone did it to try and swindle anyone. The quality of the fakes wasn't good enough to pass any inspection that went farther than glancing at the box and for that, a crook could have glued rocks inside the box. Making full epoxy mock ups of the actual parts, and adding a machined aluminum shroud to the "CPU" doesn't make any sense if the point was simply fraud.<br> <br>

Distributors *do* often get mock ups of fragile and expensive parts to make sure it goes through their machines without getting damaged or stuck. They'd also need wight accurate mock ups to plan how to stack it on pallets so they don't fall over, how to stack them on trucks so the trucks are balanced, make sure they pass through security scanners, etc. <br> <br>

I worked in an distribution center for Chief Auto Parts back in HS (late 80s)  and we'd constantly get pallets of fake parts to use for planning purposes. And they often had spelling and other printing issues with things like labels because they were done by some printer hired by whoever did the mockups which means a distributor based in China gets Engrish labels.
Although back in the 80s mock parts came in palette swapped boxes with "DEMO UNIT! NOT FOR RESALE!" stamped all over the box and parts so it was impossible to get the two mixed up. Maybe Intel just isn't as smart about making fakes as Raybestos is.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It makes a lot more sense that these were units made to be used internally as mock ups than it does that someone did it to try and swindle anyone .
The quality of the fakes was n't good enough to pass any inspection that went farther than glancing at the box and for that , a crook could have glued rocks inside the box .
Making full epoxy mock ups of the actual parts , and adding a machined aluminum shroud to the " CPU " does n't make any sense if the point was simply fraud .
Distributors * do * often get mock ups of fragile and expensive parts to make sure it goes through their machines without getting damaged or stuck .
They 'd also need wight accurate mock ups to plan how to stack it on pallets so they do n't fall over , how to stack them on trucks so the trucks are balanced , make sure they pass through security scanners , etc .
I worked in an distribution center for Chief Auto Parts back in HS ( late 80s ) and we 'd constantly get pallets of fake parts to use for planning purposes .
And they often had spelling and other printing issues with things like labels because they were done by some printer hired by whoever did the mockups which means a distributor based in China gets Engrish labels .
Although back in the 80s mock parts came in palette swapped boxes with " DEMO UNIT !
NOT FOR RESALE !
" stamped all over the box and parts so it was impossible to get the two mixed up .
Maybe Intel just is n't as smart about making fakes as Raybestos is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It makes a lot more sense that these were units made to be used internally as mock ups than it does that someone did it to try and swindle anyone.
The quality of the fakes wasn't good enough to pass any inspection that went farther than glancing at the box and for that, a crook could have glued rocks inside the box.
Making full epoxy mock ups of the actual parts, and adding a machined aluminum shroud to the "CPU" doesn't make any sense if the point was simply fraud.
Distributors *do* often get mock ups of fragile and expensive parts to make sure it goes through their machines without getting damaged or stuck.
They'd also need wight accurate mock ups to plan how to stack it on pallets so they don't fall over, how to stack them on trucks so the trucks are balanced, make sure they pass through security scanners, etc.
I worked in an distribution center for Chief Auto Parts back in HS (late 80s)  and we'd constantly get pallets of fake parts to use for planning purposes.
And they often had spelling and other printing issues with things like labels because they were done by some printer hired by whoever did the mockups which means a distributor based in China gets Engrish labels.
Although back in the 80s mock parts came in palette swapped boxes with "DEMO UNIT!
NOT FOR RESALE!
" stamped all over the box and parts so it was impossible to get the two mixed up.
Maybe Intel just isn't as smart about making fakes as Raybestos is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384956</id>
	<title>I want one!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267882320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is sooo sweet!<br> <br>
I've been wanting to build a fake computer for quite some time now.  It will go perfectly with my fake Italian leather chair and fake wood desk!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is sooo sweet !
I 've been wanting to build a fake computer for quite some time now .
It will go perfectly with my fake Italian leather chair and fake wood desk !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is sooo sweet!
I've been wanting to build a fake computer for quite some time now.
It will go perfectly with my fake Italian leather chair and fake wood desk!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385242</id>
	<title>Re:From Intels Elbonian manufacturing plant</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267884600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.intel.com/pressroom/kits/manufacturing/manufacturing\_qa.htm</p><p>The company has six assembly and test sites worldwide and is building a seventh, all of them outside the U.S. Assembly and test sites outside the United States are located in Shanghai, China; Chengdu, China; San Jose, Costa Rica; Kulim, Malaysia; Penang, Malaysia; and Cavite, Philippines. An assembly and testing site in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, is under construction. There is one testing facility and one assembly development facility inside the U.S.</p><p>Those are all very populous and relatively affluent areas for their respective countries.  Dilbert jokes aside, why is this interesting?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.intel.com/pressroom/kits/manufacturing/manufacturing \ _qa.htmThe company has six assembly and test sites worldwide and is building a seventh , all of them outside the U.S. Assembly and test sites outside the United States are located in Shanghai , China ; Chengdu , China ; San Jose , Costa Rica ; Kulim , Malaysia ; Penang , Malaysia ; and Cavite , Philippines .
An assembly and testing site in Ho Chi Minh City , Vietnam , is under construction .
There is one testing facility and one assembly development facility inside the U.S.Those are all very populous and relatively affluent areas for their respective countries .
Dilbert jokes aside , why is this interesting ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.intel.com/pressroom/kits/manufacturing/manufacturing\_qa.htmThe company has six assembly and test sites worldwide and is building a seventh, all of them outside the U.S. Assembly and test sites outside the United States are located in Shanghai, China; Chengdu, China; San Jose, Costa Rica; Kulim, Malaysia; Penang, Malaysia; and Cavite, Philippines.
An assembly and testing site in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, is under construction.
There is one testing facility and one assembly development facility inside the U.S.Those are all very populous and relatively affluent areas for their respective countries.
Dilbert jokes aside, why is this interesting?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386058</id>
	<title>Re:How do you create a fake CPU?</title>
	<author>Mashiki</author>
	<datestamp>1267891980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Other comments above me apply.  But silkscreening of CPU's was also a really common way of faking a CPU back in the days when mobo's could use more then one chip type.  Then there were the CPU's for the SLOT-A's where someone had actually taken the time to pull them carefully apart, dink around with them so they'd be a higher clock.  Put them back together with seals, and rescreen the box.  Selling a low-end P3 or Athlon for three times the price.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Other comments above me apply .
But silkscreening of CPU 's was also a really common way of faking a CPU back in the days when mobo 's could use more then one chip type .
Then there were the CPU 's for the SLOT-A 's where someone had actually taken the time to pull them carefully apart , dink around with them so they 'd be a higher clock .
Put them back together with seals , and rescreen the box .
Selling a low-end P3 or Athlon for three times the price .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Other comments above me apply.
But silkscreening of CPU's was also a really common way of faking a CPU back in the days when mobo's could use more then one chip type.
Then there were the CPU's for the SLOT-A's where someone had actually taken the time to pull them carefully apart, dink around with them so they'd be a higher clock.
Put them back together with seals, and rescreen the box.
Selling a low-end P3 or Athlon for three times the price.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384930</id>
	<title>Re:asian counterfeits?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267882080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its not THAT hard to do this at home. Good color laser and good paper could do the box. The rest, any highschool student with some basic tools could do.</p><p>Rather funny if you ask me, I'm surprised its taken this long for something like this to happen in the mainstream</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its not THAT hard to do this at home .
Good color laser and good paper could do the box .
The rest , any highschool student with some basic tools could do.Rather funny if you ask me , I 'm surprised its taken this long for something like this to happen in the mainstream</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its not THAT hard to do this at home.
Good color laser and good paper could do the box.
The rest, any highschool student with some basic tools could do.Rather funny if you ask me, I'm surprised its taken this long for something like this to happen in the mainstream</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384590</id>
	<title>Probably not Neweggs fault</title>
	<author>mnooning</author>
	<datestamp>1267879080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I also do not think it is Neweggs fault.  I purchase a hardware a lot, and often from Newegg.  They are one of the few outfits I trust.  Twice in the last 6-8 years they refunded my money without too much of a hassle.  One time because I received a "lot of" 10 usb drives that were waaaay too slow to be usb 2.0.  Their supplier stood by their product and wrote a BS response, but Newegg saw through the BS and gave me my money back.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I also do not think it is Neweggs fault .
I purchase a hardware a lot , and often from Newegg .
They are one of the few outfits I trust .
Twice in the last 6-8 years they refunded my money without too much of a hassle .
One time because I received a " lot of " 10 usb drives that were waaaay too slow to be usb 2.0 .
Their supplier stood by their product and wrote a BS response , but Newegg saw through the BS and gave me my money back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I also do not think it is Neweggs fault.
I purchase a hardware a lot, and often from Newegg.
They are one of the few outfits I trust.
Twice in the last 6-8 years they refunded my money without too much of a hassle.
One time because I received a "lot of" 10 usb drives that were waaaay too slow to be usb 2.0.
Their supplier stood by their product and wrote a BS response, but Newegg saw through the BS and gave me my money back.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385348</id>
	<title>Re:asian counterfeits?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267885320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Chances are a substantial number of real CPUs were stolen and replaced with these fakes.</p></div><p>Also possible: someone wanted to pad the numbers of a shipment. "Sure, we may only have 9,000 chips, but we need to send 10,000"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Chances are a substantial number of real CPUs were stolen and replaced with these fakes.Also possible : someone wanted to pad the numbers of a shipment .
" Sure , we may only have 9,000 chips , but we need to send 10,000 "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chances are a substantial number of real CPUs were stolen and replaced with these fakes.Also possible: someone wanted to pad the numbers of a shipment.
"Sure, we may only have 9,000 chips, but we need to send 10,000"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384818</id>
	<title>Re:Been caught out with faked good from Amazon too</title>
	<author>zubiaur</author>
	<datestamp>1267881120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am fairly certain that Amazon also sold fake ipod usb adapters, the new small ones, I got two of those from ebay and they were a fairly good fake (knew before buying, after all they were 3 usd including shipping), except that all of them had the same serial number and a misspelled "desgn by apple in california".<p>Here the link <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Apple-Power-Adapter-iPod-iPhone/dp/B001GQ3DP6/ref=sr\_1\_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1267920282&amp;sr=8-1" title="amazon.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Apple-Power-Adapter-iPod-iPhone/dp/B001GQ3DP6/ref=sr\_1\_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1267920282&amp;sr=8-1</a> [amazon.com] I invite you to read the reviews, for me it was no trouble this little guys being fake, I use them to power up a couple of old pda that now act just as fancy clocks and rss readers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am fairly certain that Amazon also sold fake ipod usb adapters , the new small ones , I got two of those from ebay and they were a fairly good fake ( knew before buying , after all they were 3 usd including shipping ) , except that all of them had the same serial number and a misspelled " desgn by apple in california " .Here the link http : //www.amazon.com/Apple-Power-Adapter-iPod-iPhone/dp/B001GQ3DP6/ref = sr \ _1 \ _1 ? ie = UTF8&amp;s = electronics&amp;qid = 1267920282&amp;sr = 8-1 [ amazon.com ] I invite you to read the reviews , for me it was no trouble this little guys being fake , I use them to power up a couple of old pda that now act just as fancy clocks and rss readers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am fairly certain that Amazon also sold fake ipod usb adapters, the new small ones, I got two of those from ebay and they were a fairly good fake (knew before buying, after all they were 3 usd including shipping), except that all of them had the same serial number and a misspelled "desgn by apple in california".Here the link http://www.amazon.com/Apple-Power-Adapter-iPod-iPhone/dp/B001GQ3DP6/ref=sr\_1\_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1267920282&amp;sr=8-1 [amazon.com] I invite you to read the reviews, for me it was no trouble this little guys being fake, I use them to power up a couple of old pda that now act just as fancy clocks and rss readers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385368</id>
	<title>Re:asian counterfeits?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267885380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You ever see the faces of hungry children?</p><p>Chances are this kind of thing will continue on until there is some equivelance,</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You ever see the faces of hungry children ? Chances are this kind of thing will continue on until there is some equivelance,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You ever see the faces of hungry children?Chances are this kind of thing will continue on until there is some equivelance,</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384770</id>
	<title>Re:hey, Newegg</title>
	<author>RickRussellTX</author>
	<datestamp>1267880640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, they've said almost exactly this on Twitter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , they 've said almost exactly this on Twitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, they've said almost exactly this on Twitter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384700</id>
	<title>Re:Newegg has responded</title>
	<author>spydabyte</author>
	<datestamp>1267880100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's a very interesting case of customer service via twitter.<br>
<a href="http://twitter.com/Newegg/" title="twitter.com">http://twitter.com/Newegg/</a> [twitter.com] <br> <br>

Looks pretty much like it's replacing a contact number. Contact support and complain to your friends at the same time!</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a very interesting case of customer service via twitter .
http : //twitter.com/Newegg/ [ twitter.com ] Looks pretty much like it 's replacing a contact number .
Contact support and complain to your friends at the same time !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a very interesting case of customer service via twitter.
http://twitter.com/Newegg/ [twitter.com]  

Looks pretty much like it's replacing a contact number.
Contact support and complain to your friends at the same time!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386584</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>unixan</author>
	<datestamp>1267897800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>--but from then on, I always opened my cartridges at the register after paying.</p></div><p>Unnecessary if you are in the US, or a country with similar consumer-protection laws.  You are allowed to open the product at the store to inspect it prior to purchase.</p><p>If they object to having to repackage (e.g. shrink wrap it again), tough cookies, especially if you fully intended on purchasing the product and found it to be faulty.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>--but from then on , I always opened my cartridges at the register after paying.Unnecessary if you are in the US , or a country with similar consumer-protection laws .
You are allowed to open the product at the store to inspect it prior to purchase.If they object to having to repackage ( e.g .
shrink wrap it again ) , tough cookies , especially if you fully intended on purchasing the product and found it to be faulty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>--but from then on, I always opened my cartridges at the register after paying.Unnecessary if you are in the US, or a country with similar consumer-protection laws.
You are allowed to open the product at the store to inspect it prior to purchase.If they object to having to repackage (e.g.
shrink wrap it again), tough cookies, especially if you fully intended on purchasing the product and found it to be faulty.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384828</id>
	<title>Re:Not buying Neweggs explanation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267881180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's likely the story they are being told by their "long term partner".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's likely the story they are being told by their " long term partner " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's likely the story they are being told by their "long term partner".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384710</id>
	<title>There must be more out there</title>
	<author>Lashat</author>
	<datestamp>1267880100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Newegg may be at fault if they purchased the CPUs wholesale and didn't properly inspect the shipment or validate the supplier.</p><p>That is a professional knock-off.  A counterfeit this detailed with printed boxes, stickers, and material in the box to match the weight shipping weight is not free to produce.  It is not profitable to go through this much trouble and expense for one or even a dozen units.  There must be hundreds out there.</p><p>Unless, of course, the fine article author is pulling a fast one.  I really doubt it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Newegg may be at fault if they purchased the CPUs wholesale and did n't properly inspect the shipment or validate the supplier.That is a professional knock-off .
A counterfeit this detailed with printed boxes , stickers , and material in the box to match the weight shipping weight is not free to produce .
It is not profitable to go through this much trouble and expense for one or even a dozen units .
There must be hundreds out there.Unless , of course , the fine article author is pulling a fast one .
I really doubt it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Newegg may be at fault if they purchased the CPUs wholesale and didn't properly inspect the shipment or validate the supplier.That is a professional knock-off.
A counterfeit this detailed with printed boxes, stickers, and material in the box to match the weight shipping weight is not free to produce.
It is not profitable to go through this much trouble and expense for one or even a dozen units.
There must be hundreds out there.Unless, of course, the fine article author is pulling a fast one.
I really doubt it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384532</id>
	<title>asian counterfeits?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267878660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These look like professionally done asian counterfeits to me. It's quite likely organized criminals are involved since it took a lot of resources to custom print the boxes and labels, and make the foam HSFs and fake cpus.</p><p>This isn't something the average joe or jane can do in his or her grandma's basement, you've got to have access to professional printing equipment at the very least.</p><p>Chances are a substantial number of real CPUs were stolen and replaced with these fakes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These look like professionally done asian counterfeits to me .
It 's quite likely organized criminals are involved since it took a lot of resources to custom print the boxes and labels , and make the foam HSFs and fake cpus.This is n't something the average joe or jane can do in his or her grandma 's basement , you 've got to have access to professional printing equipment at the very least.Chances are a substantial number of real CPUs were stolen and replaced with these fakes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These look like professionally done asian counterfeits to me.
It's quite likely organized criminals are involved since it took a lot of resources to custom print the boxes and labels, and make the foam HSFs and fake cpus.This isn't something the average joe or jane can do in his or her grandma's basement, you've got to have access to professional printing equipment at the very least.Chances are a substantial number of real CPUs were stolen and replaced with these fakes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386328</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>blackraven14250</author>
	<datestamp>1267894800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Megaman had to foreshadow his rise to awesome by screwing over Link and other RPG characters.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Megaman had to foreshadow his rise to awesome by screwing over Link and other RPG characters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Megaman had to foreshadow his rise to awesome by screwing over Link and other RPG characters.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31393294</id>
	<title>Unethical NewEgg trade practices</title>
	<author>bwave</author>
	<datestamp>1267954020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ok here is the real problem.   There are 5 authorized distributors for retail boxed cpus.  Newegg has admitted D&amp;H is the distributor.   Newegg is a direct to end-user retailer.  How/Why is it that they are able to sell to an end-user for $288 when the same cpu to valued D&amp;H partners wholesale is $305.   This is very unethical.   Newegg should not be able to sell to end-users for less than a reseller is even able to buy the cpu for.  How are we to be competitive?  We're not.   Newegg strongarms distributors all the time.   ASI is a big drop shipper for them and they sell stuff to newegg for 10\% less than their listed "cost" in their system.

This is why there is such a huge gray market anyway.  A reseller is committing suicide to buy from authorized channel.

Here's the other issue, they are claiming that D&amp;H SHIPPED them 2000 cpus and 300 were fakes.  Newegg doesn't stock ANYTHING  (ok a very small percentage)  it is all drop-shipped.  So these had to ship directly from D&amp;H to customer  (someone post the address of the warehouse of your fakes).

Newegg sucks, they can't ever manage to ship same day even if ordered at noon EST.  Especially if you pay for next-day air.  I've paid for express shipping from NJ to MD  (1 day ground typically)  and receive the product a week later.   I get products faster from them via USPS Mail Innovations (the cheapest/slowest method)  than I do from UPS/Fedex.   Worst part is Newegg can't tell you where the product is, or when it's shipping  (b/c they drop ship everything).   It makes no sense that you can order from any other computer company up until 5pm/6pm/7pm EST and have next day, yet you're lucky to get something from Newegg even shipped for 2 days+</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok here is the real problem .
There are 5 authorized distributors for retail boxed cpus .
Newegg has admitted D&amp;H is the distributor .
Newegg is a direct to end-user retailer .
How/Why is it that they are able to sell to an end-user for $ 288 when the same cpu to valued D&amp;H partners wholesale is $ 305 .
This is very unethical .
Newegg should not be able to sell to end-users for less than a reseller is even able to buy the cpu for .
How are we to be competitive ?
We 're not .
Newegg strongarms distributors all the time .
ASI is a big drop shipper for them and they sell stuff to newegg for 10 \ % less than their listed " cost " in their system .
This is why there is such a huge gray market anyway .
A reseller is committing suicide to buy from authorized channel .
Here 's the other issue , they are claiming that D&amp;H SHIPPED them 2000 cpus and 300 were fakes .
Newegg does n't stock ANYTHING ( ok a very small percentage ) it is all drop-shipped .
So these had to ship directly from D&amp;H to customer ( someone post the address of the warehouse of your fakes ) .
Newegg sucks , they ca n't ever manage to ship same day even if ordered at noon EST .
Especially if you pay for next-day air .
I 've paid for express shipping from NJ to MD ( 1 day ground typically ) and receive the product a week later .
I get products faster from them via USPS Mail Innovations ( the cheapest/slowest method ) than I do from UPS/Fedex .
Worst part is Newegg ca n't tell you where the product is , or when it 's shipping ( b/c they drop ship everything ) .
It makes no sense that you can order from any other computer company up until 5pm/6pm/7pm EST and have next day , yet you 're lucky to get something from Newegg even shipped for 2 days +</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok here is the real problem.
There are 5 authorized distributors for retail boxed cpus.
Newegg has admitted D&amp;H is the distributor.
Newegg is a direct to end-user retailer.
How/Why is it that they are able to sell to an end-user for $288 when the same cpu to valued D&amp;H partners wholesale is $305.
This is very unethical.
Newegg should not be able to sell to end-users for less than a reseller is even able to buy the cpu for.
How are we to be competitive?
We're not.
Newegg strongarms distributors all the time.
ASI is a big drop shipper for them and they sell stuff to newegg for 10\% less than their listed "cost" in their system.
This is why there is such a huge gray market anyway.
A reseller is committing suicide to buy from authorized channel.
Here's the other issue, they are claiming that D&amp;H SHIPPED them 2000 cpus and 300 were fakes.
Newegg doesn't stock ANYTHING  (ok a very small percentage)  it is all drop-shipped.
So these had to ship directly from D&amp;H to customer  (someone post the address of the warehouse of your fakes).
Newegg sucks, they can't ever manage to ship same day even if ordered at noon EST.
Especially if you pay for next-day air.
I've paid for express shipping from NJ to MD  (1 day ground typically)  and receive the product a week later.
I get products faster from them via USPS Mail Innovations (the cheapest/slowest method)  than I do from UPS/Fedex.
Worst part is Newegg can't tell you where the product is, or when it's shipping  (b/c they drop ship everything).
It makes no sense that you can order from any other computer company up until 5pm/6pm/7pm EST and have next day, yet you're lucky to get something from Newegg even shipped for 2 days+</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384576</id>
	<title>Re:I won't buy from newegg any more.....</title>
	<author>jdhutchins</author>
	<datestamp>1267879020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.newegg.com/HelpInfo/ReturnPolicy.aspx#29" title="newegg.com">http://www.newegg.com/HelpInfo/ReturnPolicy.aspx#29</a> [newegg.com]  Newegg will refund open box items, but won't replace them (presumably because they may not have enough stock to replace it)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.newegg.com/HelpInfo/ReturnPolicy.aspx # 29 [ newegg.com ] Newegg will refund open box items , but wo n't replace them ( presumably because they may not have enough stock to replace it )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.newegg.com/HelpInfo/ReturnPolicy.aspx#29 [newegg.com]  Newegg will refund open box items, but won't replace them (presumably because they may not have enough stock to replace it)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386072</id>
	<title>Re:Not buying Neweggs explanation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267892040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Think, If these CPU suppliers are also in the market for providing demo units, for display to retailers in ANY given country. It is not hard to assume that a shipment of these similarly packaged product was mistakenly sent to Newegg instead of a retail vendor who would redistribute the boxes to their store front locations. Again, THINK.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Think , If these CPU suppliers are also in the market for providing demo units , for display to retailers in ANY given country .
It is not hard to assume that a shipment of these similarly packaged product was mistakenly sent to Newegg instead of a retail vendor who would redistribute the boxes to their store front locations .
Again , THINK .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think, If these CPU suppliers are also in the market for providing demo units, for display to retailers in ANY given country.
It is not hard to assume that a shipment of these similarly packaged product was mistakenly sent to Newegg instead of a retail vendor who would redistribute the boxes to their store front locations.
Again, THINK.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387498</id>
	<title>Re:Not me!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267952400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a New Egg executive, I have to tell you that this whole business has nothing to do with Intel. The problem appears to have started when we started outsourcing our supplies from a Nigerian middle man. He said they have a surplus of chips that they can't get out of the country because of export restrictions (apparently he is wanted by Interpol for smuggling UF6 to Iran), so he gave us a deal that we couldn't refuse if we helped him unload these processors.</p><p>The tough part is trying to get our customer reps to convince the customers that when they signed for the delivery, they acknowledged that they got what they paid for. Too bad really, it hardly seems fair. I almost feel like giving my quarterly bonus to the Better Business Bureau. And yes, I really am a New Egg executive. The only reason I didn't login to Slashdot is because I don't have an account here.</p><p>Signed,</p><p>Tally C. Liu</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a New Egg executive , I have to tell you that this whole business has nothing to do with Intel .
The problem appears to have started when we started outsourcing our supplies from a Nigerian middle man .
He said they have a surplus of chips that they ca n't get out of the country because of export restrictions ( apparently he is wanted by Interpol for smuggling UF6 to Iran ) , so he gave us a deal that we could n't refuse if we helped him unload these processors.The tough part is trying to get our customer reps to convince the customers that when they signed for the delivery , they acknowledged that they got what they paid for .
Too bad really , it hardly seems fair .
I almost feel like giving my quarterly bonus to the Better Business Bureau .
And yes , I really am a New Egg executive .
The only reason I did n't login to Slashdot is because I do n't have an account here.Signed,Tally C. Liu</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a New Egg executive, I have to tell you that this whole business has nothing to do with Intel.
The problem appears to have started when we started outsourcing our supplies from a Nigerian middle man.
He said they have a surplus of chips that they can't get out of the country because of export restrictions (apparently he is wanted by Interpol for smuggling UF6 to Iran), so he gave us a deal that we couldn't refuse if we helped him unload these processors.The tough part is trying to get our customer reps to convince the customers that when they signed for the delivery, they acknowledged that they got what they paid for.
Too bad really, it hardly seems fair.
I almost feel like giving my quarterly bonus to the Better Business Bureau.
And yes, I really am a New Egg executive.
The only reason I didn't login to Slashdot is because I don't have an account here.Signed,Tally C. Liu</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384834</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267881240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just after they started selling games in those new small boxes, I was looking around in a Gamestop. I noticed that almost all of their copies of Morrowind looked kinda weird - kinda rough around the edges. I picked one up and looked at it.</p><p>Someone had come in, cut the seal open, and snuck the game CD out of the box. From the looks of things, this had happened to almost all of the boxes they had in stock.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just after they started selling games in those new small boxes , I was looking around in a Gamestop .
I noticed that almost all of their copies of Morrowind looked kinda weird - kinda rough around the edges .
I picked one up and looked at it.Someone had come in , cut the seal open , and snuck the game CD out of the box .
From the looks of things , this had happened to almost all of the boxes they had in stock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just after they started selling games in those new small boxes, I was looking around in a Gamestop.
I noticed that almost all of their copies of Morrowind looked kinda weird - kinda rough around the edges.
I picked one up and looked at it.Someone had come in, cut the seal open, and snuck the game CD out of the box.
From the looks of things, this had happened to almost all of the boxes they had in stock.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385082</id>
	<title>Re:Dropship?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267883580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It depends on the product. I ordered something a couple of years ago, a scanner, that was DOA and after talking with one of the supervisory people, that particular scanner was dropped shipped from the manufacturer when I complained that it should never have left their warehouse and what were they thinking. </p><p>They're doing something to keep their prices down. Check Amazon, too. Sometimes they get into price wars and you can get a better deal with them.</p><p>Next time I have to mail order something, I'm going to see if I can get one of them to beat the others price.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It depends on the product .
I ordered something a couple of years ago , a scanner , that was DOA and after talking with one of the supervisory people , that particular scanner was dropped shipped from the manufacturer when I complained that it should never have left their warehouse and what were they thinking .
They 're doing something to keep their prices down .
Check Amazon , too .
Sometimes they get into price wars and you can get a better deal with them.Next time I have to mail order something , I 'm going to see if I can get one of them to beat the others price .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It depends on the product.
I ordered something a couple of years ago, a scanner, that was DOA and after talking with one of the supervisory people, that particular scanner was dropped shipped from the manufacturer when I complained that it should never have left their warehouse and what were they thinking.
They're doing something to keep their prices down.
Check Amazon, too.
Sometimes they get into price wars and you can get a better deal with them.Next time I have to mail order something, I'm going to see if I can get one of them to beat the others price.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31390034</id>
	<title>wholy crap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267978560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i ordered an i7-920 about in October of last year, and have been a happy Newegg customer for years. surprisingly after looking at the pictures of the faked goods a quick look would not raise any red flags. but closer inspection reveals many issues (box alone) like a 7 grader faking a progress report! (i admit it, statute of limitations is up) i suspect that these counterfeits are from a non English speaking, or an amateur counterfeiter. what gets me is that i could have been shipped a counterfeit, the packing that was only a month off. what i would like to see is what steps Intel is going to take to remedy this. faked electronics is becoming a large problem, even if the faked goods operate exactly as their non-faked counterparts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i ordered an i7-920 about in October of last year , and have been a happy Newegg customer for years .
surprisingly after looking at the pictures of the faked goods a quick look would not raise any red flags .
but closer inspection reveals many issues ( box alone ) like a 7 grader faking a progress report !
( i admit it , statute of limitations is up ) i suspect that these counterfeits are from a non English speaking , or an amateur counterfeiter .
what gets me is that i could have been shipped a counterfeit , the packing that was only a month off .
what i would like to see is what steps Intel is going to take to remedy this .
faked electronics is becoming a large problem , even if the faked goods operate exactly as their non-faked counterparts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i ordered an i7-920 about in October of last year, and have been a happy Newegg customer for years.
surprisingly after looking at the pictures of the faked goods a quick look would not raise any red flags.
but closer inspection reveals many issues (box alone) like a 7 grader faking a progress report!
(i admit it, statute of limitations is up) i suspect that these counterfeits are from a non English speaking, or an amateur counterfeiter.
what gets me is that i could have been shipped a counterfeit, the packing that was only a month off.
what i would like to see is what steps Intel is going to take to remedy this.
faked electronics is becoming a large problem, even if the faked goods operate exactly as their non-faked counterparts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384650</id>
	<title>Re:no way newegg's fault</title>
	<author>Pyrion</author>
	<datestamp>1267879620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>No more so than usual - you still have to foot the bill to ship the item back to them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No more so than usual - you still have to foot the bill to ship the item back to them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No more so than usual - you still have to foot the bill to ship the item back to them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385036</id>
	<title>Re:Not buying Neweggs explanation</title>
	<author>nedlohs</author>
	<datestamp>1267883040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because that's what their supplier told them. And until they know otherwise they aren't going to slander a business partner.</p><p>If they do find out otherwise, I suspect they will make another announcement about that...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because that 's what their supplier told them .
And until they know otherwise they are n't going to slander a business partner.If they do find out otherwise , I suspect they will make another announcement about that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because that's what their supplier told them.
And until they know otherwise they aren't going to slander a business partner.If they do find out otherwise, I suspect they will make another announcement about that...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385302</id>
	<title>Re:Newegg has responded</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1267885020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>AFAIK most CPU and GPU design still happens in the USA (AMD, Intel, nVidia) and Canada (Matrox, ATI... we used to have AdLib and Gravis for entry-level and kick-ass soundcards too).</p><p>Production of the hardware is another story.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AFAIK most CPU and GPU design still happens in the USA ( AMD , Intel , nVidia ) and Canada ( Matrox , ATI... we used to have AdLib and Gravis for entry-level and kick-ass soundcards too ) .Production of the hardware is another story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AFAIK most CPU and GPU design still happens in the USA (AMD, Intel, nVidia) and Canada (Matrox, ATI... we used to have AdLib and Gravis for entry-level and kick-ass soundcards too).Production of the hardware is another story.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386344</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>blackraven14250</author>
	<datestamp>1267894920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Posts like these need a limit of +10 instead of +5.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Posts like these need a limit of + 10 instead of + 5 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Posts like these need a limit of +10 instead of +5.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385918</id>
	<title>Mod troll</title>
	<author>ArchieBunker</author>
	<datestamp>1267890600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All the retards who modded this up should maybe google "elbonia".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All the retards who modded this up should maybe google " elbonia " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the retards who modded this up should maybe google "elbonia".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31400354</id>
	<title>Newegg</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268062140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Newegg is aware of a shipping error that occurred with certain recent orders of the Intel Core i7-920 CPU. After investigating the issue internally it appears one of our long term partners mistakenly shipped a small number of demo boxes instead of functional units. Our customer service team has already begun proactively reaching out to the affected customers. In line with our commitment to ensure total customer satisfaction, we are doing everything in our power to resolve the issue as soon as possible and with the least amount of inconvenience to our customers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Newegg is aware of a shipping error that occurred with certain recent orders of the Intel Core i7-920 CPU .
After investigating the issue internally it appears one of our long term partners mistakenly shipped a small number of demo boxes instead of functional units .
Our customer service team has already begun proactively reaching out to the affected customers .
In line with our commitment to ensure total customer satisfaction , we are doing everything in our power to resolve the issue as soon as possible and with the least amount of inconvenience to our customers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Newegg is aware of a shipping error that occurred with certain recent orders of the Intel Core i7-920 CPU.
After investigating the issue internally it appears one of our long term partners mistakenly shipped a small number of demo boxes instead of functional units.
Our customer service team has already begun proactively reaching out to the affected customers.
In line with our commitment to ensure total customer satisfaction, we are doing everything in our power to resolve the issue as soon as possible and with the least amount of inconvenience to our customers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384424</id>
	<title>Dropship?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267877700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does Newegg warehouse their stuff themselves or have it drop-shipped?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does Newegg warehouse their stuff themselves or have it drop-shipped ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does Newegg warehouse their stuff themselves or have it drop-shipped?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386276</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>CoderJoe</author>
	<datestamp>1267894140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had something like this, but more recently.</p><p>I went to a large well-known brick and mortar store to pick up a 2TB hard drive I needed right away. On the shelf, there were three WD 2TB green drives. Two were shrink-wrapped, while the third was not. I picked up one of the shrink-wrapped drives, bought it, and left. I had some other errands to run around town, so I didn't get to it right away.</p><p>I finally get home and open the box, and pull out the contents. There is an unsealed (never sealed on the end, not sealed and torn) anti-static bag with a drive in it. inside the bag is also a yellow warranty paper, which is conveniently covering up the model numbers. I take them out of the bag and discover an old 30GB PATA drive with lots of dust and scratches.</p><p>Pissed off, I check the store's closing time and find I have just over 30 minutes, which is about how long it takes to get there. I put everything back in the box and bust ass getting back up there. The girl at the returns counter was a little baffled at my claim, and called for a manager. They deliberate for a minute or two in a back room, and I am told to get another drive off the shelf. I go grab the other shrink-wrapped box. The girl at the returns counter opened it, and the contents of THAT box were the same as the one I had taken home. She then tells me to get another, and I do. The last box, without shrinkwrap, contained the proper drive.</p><p>I have no idea how those old, used PATA drives ended up in "new" 2TB SATA drive boxes. A month or two later, I happened to notice that all of WD's boxes of that design HAVE NO SHRINKWRAP. Just a seal on the flaps at the top and bottom of the drive. If you're getting a WD retail drive at a B&amp;M, and the box is of the 2.5 by 5 by 7.5 inch size, be suspicious if it is in shrink wrap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had something like this , but more recently.I went to a large well-known brick and mortar store to pick up a 2TB hard drive I needed right away .
On the shelf , there were three WD 2TB green drives .
Two were shrink-wrapped , while the third was not .
I picked up one of the shrink-wrapped drives , bought it , and left .
I had some other errands to run around town , so I did n't get to it right away.I finally get home and open the box , and pull out the contents .
There is an unsealed ( never sealed on the end , not sealed and torn ) anti-static bag with a drive in it .
inside the bag is also a yellow warranty paper , which is conveniently covering up the model numbers .
I take them out of the bag and discover an old 30GB PATA drive with lots of dust and scratches.Pissed off , I check the store 's closing time and find I have just over 30 minutes , which is about how long it takes to get there .
I put everything back in the box and bust ass getting back up there .
The girl at the returns counter was a little baffled at my claim , and called for a manager .
They deliberate for a minute or two in a back room , and I am told to get another drive off the shelf .
I go grab the other shrink-wrapped box .
The girl at the returns counter opened it , and the contents of THAT box were the same as the one I had taken home .
She then tells me to get another , and I do .
The last box , without shrinkwrap , contained the proper drive.I have no idea how those old , used PATA drives ended up in " new " 2TB SATA drive boxes .
A month or two later , I happened to notice that all of WD 's boxes of that design HAVE NO SHRINKWRAP .
Just a seal on the flaps at the top and bottom of the drive .
If you 're getting a WD retail drive at a B&amp;M , and the box is of the 2.5 by 5 by 7.5 inch size , be suspicious if it is in shrink wrap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had something like this, but more recently.I went to a large well-known brick and mortar store to pick up a 2TB hard drive I needed right away.
On the shelf, there were three WD 2TB green drives.
Two were shrink-wrapped, while the third was not.
I picked up one of the shrink-wrapped drives, bought it, and left.
I had some other errands to run around town, so I didn't get to it right away.I finally get home and open the box, and pull out the contents.
There is an unsealed (never sealed on the end, not sealed and torn) anti-static bag with a drive in it.
inside the bag is also a yellow warranty paper, which is conveniently covering up the model numbers.
I take them out of the bag and discover an old 30GB PATA drive with lots of dust and scratches.Pissed off, I check the store's closing time and find I have just over 30 minutes, which is about how long it takes to get there.
I put everything back in the box and bust ass getting back up there.
The girl at the returns counter was a little baffled at my claim, and called for a manager.
They deliberate for a minute or two in a back room, and I am told to get another drive off the shelf.
I go grab the other shrink-wrapped box.
The girl at the returns counter opened it, and the contents of THAT box were the same as the one I had taken home.
She then tells me to get another, and I do.
The last box, without shrinkwrap, contained the proper drive.I have no idea how those old, used PATA drives ended up in "new" 2TB SATA drive boxes.
A month or two later, I happened to notice that all of WD's boxes of that design HAVE NO SHRINKWRAP.
Just a seal on the flaps at the top and bottom of the drive.
If you're getting a WD retail drive at a B&amp;M, and the box is of the 2.5 by 5 by 7.5 inch size, be suspicious if it is in shrink wrap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386354</id>
	<title>Re:Not me!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267895040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&amp;item=330411508071</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll ? ViewItem&amp;item = 330411508071</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&amp;item=330411508071</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385642</id>
	<title>Re:From Intels Elbonian manufacturing plant</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267887600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How dumb do you think people in these poor countries are?? Sounds pretty arrogant to me, considering you got Alabama and Utah in your backyard, and politicians saying on live TV that you should appeal to the &ldquo;supernatural powers&rdquo;.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How dumb do you think people in these poor countries are ? ?
Sounds pretty arrogant to me , considering you got Alabama and Utah in your backyard , and politicians saying on live TV that you should appeal to the    supernatural powers    .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How dumb do you think people in these poor countries are??
Sounds pretty arrogant to me, considering you got Alabama and Utah in your backyard, and politicians saying on live TV that you should appeal to the “supernatural powers”.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31388710</id>
	<title>Re:Not buying Neweggs explanation</title>
	<author>u38cg</author>
	<datestamp>1267970700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Newegg's responsibility in this situation is to close the issue down and deal with the problem.  If you can read between the lines as far as you have, you can get the rest of the way.  What do they stand to gain from making a fuss about it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Newegg 's responsibility in this situation is to close the issue down and deal with the problem .
If you can read between the lines as far as you have , you can get the rest of the way .
What do they stand to gain from making a fuss about it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Newegg's responsibility in this situation is to close the issue down and deal with the problem.
If you can read between the lines as far as you have, you can get the rest of the way.
What do they stand to gain from making a fuss about it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386184</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267893240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>. When I opened it, instead of a cartridge it had a bolt with a couple nuts screwed on so it would weigh the same as a cartridge.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...I suspect a factory worker took home a little souveneir... but who knows?</p></div><p>I'd say it was likely a customer return. As a jerky kid with no money in high school I once "replaced" a broken Commodore 1541 disk drive by repacking a brick in the box and re-shrink-wrapping the box. I obtained <i>F-15 Strike Eagle</i> by peeling the sticker of the 5.25" disk and putting it on a blank disk. The manual got its staples straightened and the inside pages removed, replaced with blank paper.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>.
When I opened it , instead of a cartridge it had a bolt with a couple nuts screwed on so it would weigh the same as a cartridge .
...I suspect a factory worker took home a little souveneir... but who knows ? I 'd say it was likely a customer return .
As a jerky kid with no money in high school I once " replaced " a broken Commodore 1541 disk drive by repacking a brick in the box and re-shrink-wrapping the box .
I obtained F-15 Strike Eagle by peeling the sticker of the 5.25 " disk and putting it on a blank disk .
The manual got its staples straightened and the inside pages removed , replaced with blank paper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.
When I opened it, instead of a cartridge it had a bolt with a couple nuts screwed on so it would weigh the same as a cartridge.
...I suspect a factory worker took home a little souveneir... but who knows?I'd say it was likely a customer return.
As a jerky kid with no money in high school I once "replaced" a broken Commodore 1541 disk drive by repacking a brick in the box and re-shrink-wrapping the box.
I obtained F-15 Strike Eagle by peeling the sticker of the 5.25" disk and putting it on a blank disk.
The manual got its staples straightened and the inside pages removed, replaced with blank paper.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385330</id>
	<title>Re:There must be more out there</title>
	<author>enilnomi</author>
	<datestamp>1267885140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>A counterfeit this detailed with printed boxes, stickers, and material in the box...</i> </p><p>So much for, "Print is dead."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A counterfeit this detailed with printed boxes , stickers , and material in the box... So much for , " Print is dead .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext> A counterfeit this detailed with printed boxes, stickers, and material in the box... So much for, "Print is dead.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386744</id>
	<title>Re:Relax, NewEgg is a fine store</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1267899600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Troll? Really? Since when does Slashdot give mod points to humor-impaired users who have never seen <a href="http://www.snpp.com/episodes/3F11.html" title="snpp.com">The Simpsons?</a> [snpp.com] *sigh* I must be getting old.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Troll ?
Really ? Since when does Slashdot give mod points to humor-impaired users who have never seen The Simpsons ?
[ snpp.com ] * sigh * I must be getting old .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Troll?
Really? Since when does Slashdot give mod points to humor-impaired users who have never seen The Simpsons?
[snpp.com] *sigh* I must be getting old.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387878</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1267958700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is bolt-related crime this common in everyone else's life?</p></div><p>No, they're just out to get <em>you</em>, man.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is bolt-related crime this common in everyone else 's life ? No , they 're just out to get you , man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is bolt-related crime this common in everyone else's life?No, they're just out to get you, man.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31390106</id>
	<title>Re:Huh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267979100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No probably not because the i7s (especially the ones higher end than these) are serious performers. You made a childish purchase. Though your name "MAZZTer" is a dead giveaway to your maturity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No probably not because the i7s ( especially the ones higher end than these ) are serious performers .
You made a childish purchase .
Though your name " MAZZTer " is a dead giveaway to your maturity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No probably not because the i7s (especially the ones higher end than these) are serious performers.
You made a childish purchase.
Though your name "MAZZTer" is a dead giveaway to your maturity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385594</id>
	<title>Fake processor?  You were lucky.</title>
	<author>cvtan</author>
	<datestamp>1267887060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>My friend bought a Motorola phone which came with a "free" USB cable from ebay.  Connecting the phone to his PC didn't work at all.  After a certain amount of fooling around, he found the cable did not have any wires in it.  It had connectors, but the cable was just made of insulation.  My explanation?  It was a wireless cable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My friend bought a Motorola phone which came with a " free " USB cable from ebay .
Connecting the phone to his PC did n't work at all .
After a certain amount of fooling around , he found the cable did not have any wires in it .
It had connectors , but the cable was just made of insulation .
My explanation ?
It was a wireless cable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My friend bought a Motorola phone which came with a "free" USB cable from ebay.
Connecting the phone to his PC didn't work at all.
After a certain amount of fooling around, he found the cable did not have any wires in it.
It had connectors, but the cable was just made of insulation.
My explanation?
It was a wireless cable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387520</id>
	<title>Re:hey, Newegg</title>
	<author>Ihmhi</author>
	<datestamp>1267952700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone please mod the parent out of the gutter, it is most certainly not a troll post. Someone is using Troll as -1 Disagree. A snippet of the parent post:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Newegg, you're one of the online businesses that I've actually come to respect. I've had excellent customer service from you in the past. This is a problem.</p><p>Radio silence does not cut it here. This is what I need to hear from you:</p><p>"Dear customers: We have been deeply concerned to hear reports that a few of our customers have received bogus goods after making purchases on Newegg. We have determined that the complaints are legitimate. We rigorously attempt to maintain the highest quality...</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone please mod the parent out of the gutter , it is most certainly not a troll post .
Someone is using Troll as -1 Disagree .
A snippet of the parent post : Newegg , you 're one of the online businesses that I 've actually come to respect .
I 've had excellent customer service from you in the past .
This is a problem.Radio silence does not cut it here .
This is what I need to hear from you : " Dear customers : We have been deeply concerned to hear reports that a few of our customers have received bogus goods after making purchases on Newegg .
We have determined that the complaints are legitimate .
We rigorously attempt to maintain the highest quality.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone please mod the parent out of the gutter, it is most certainly not a troll post.
Someone is using Troll as -1 Disagree.
A snippet of the parent post:Newegg, you're one of the online businesses that I've actually come to respect.
I've had excellent customer service from you in the past.
This is a problem.Radio silence does not cut it here.
This is what I need to hear from you:"Dear customers: We have been deeply concerned to hear reports that a few of our customers have received bogus goods after making purchases on Newegg.
We have determined that the complaints are legitimate.
We rigorously attempt to maintain the highest quality...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31421864</id>
	<title>The psycopaths have taken over</title>
	<author>AndWat</author>
	<datestamp>1268144580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As has happened to every other society in history. Evil is a disease.</p><p><a href="http://www.ponerology.com/" title="ponerology.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ponerology.com/</a> [ponerology.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As has happened to every other society in history .
Evil is a disease.http : //www.ponerology.com/ [ ponerology.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As has happened to every other society in history.
Evil is a disease.http://www.ponerology.com/ [ponerology.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387476</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267995360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Gamestop does this itself. they open the boxes, take the disc, <b>burn a copy, write down the license key information, pocket the promotional items,</b> and keep it behind the counter.</p></div><p>There, I fixed that for you. I've never seen a loose disc inside a game box, they always come in either a jewel case or a paper envelope, usually "sealed" with some type of sticker. Yet for some reason at GameStop the ones in the envelope nearly always have the little sticker over the flap torn, which indicates the disc has actually been removed and used.<br>Most legit retailers use dummy boxes for display, they can always get empty dummies for new titles. Stores which refuse to stock filled boxes and which are legit will use a ticket system (like Toys R Us) so they can give you an unopened package. This is just another reason to never use GameStop, it's way too easy to get ripped off by the clerks. And good luck getting valve/steam to un-ban your account when your copie's license number is already in use.</p><p>On a side note, I used to work retail at a similar type of store, and yes people do indeed cut the boxes to steal the disc. There's no way to put the RF security tags ON the discs themselves, so as long as you aren't seen tucking it next to your Johnson it makes for easy pickings.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gamestop does this itself .
they open the boxes , take the disc , burn a copy , write down the license key information , pocket the promotional items , and keep it behind the counter.There , I fixed that for you .
I 've never seen a loose disc inside a game box , they always come in either a jewel case or a paper envelope , usually " sealed " with some type of sticker .
Yet for some reason at GameStop the ones in the envelope nearly always have the little sticker over the flap torn , which indicates the disc has actually been removed and used.Most legit retailers use dummy boxes for display , they can always get empty dummies for new titles .
Stores which refuse to stock filled boxes and which are legit will use a ticket system ( like Toys R Us ) so they can give you an unopened package .
This is just another reason to never use GameStop , it 's way too easy to get ripped off by the clerks .
And good luck getting valve/steam to un-ban your account when your copie 's license number is already in use.On a side note , I used to work retail at a similar type of store , and yes people do indeed cut the boxes to steal the disc .
There 's no way to put the RF security tags ON the discs themselves , so as long as you are n't seen tucking it next to your Johnson it makes for easy pickings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gamestop does this itself.
they open the boxes, take the disc, burn a copy, write down the license key information, pocket the promotional items, and keep it behind the counter.There, I fixed that for you.
I've never seen a loose disc inside a game box, they always come in either a jewel case or a paper envelope, usually "sealed" with some type of sticker.
Yet for some reason at GameStop the ones in the envelope nearly always have the little sticker over the flap torn, which indicates the disc has actually been removed and used.Most legit retailers use dummy boxes for display, they can always get empty dummies for new titles.
Stores which refuse to stock filled boxes and which are legit will use a ticket system (like Toys R Us) so they can give you an unopened package.
This is just another reason to never use GameStop, it's way too easy to get ripped off by the clerks.
And good luck getting valve/steam to un-ban your account when your copie's license number is already in use.On a side note, I used to work retail at a similar type of store, and yes people do indeed cut the boxes to steal the disc.
There's no way to put the RF security tags ON the discs themselves, so as long as you aren't seen tucking it next to your Johnson it makes for easy pickings.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387692</id>
	<title>Re:It's not the first time for NewEgg</title>
	<author>TheThiefMaster</author>
	<datestamp>1267955460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you were happy enough to not even consider returning them for over a month, they must have been pretty good fakes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you were happy enough to not even consider returning them for over a month , they must have been pretty good fakes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you were happy enough to not even consider returning them for over a month, they must have been pretty good fakes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385616</id>
	<title>Re:no way newegg's fault</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1267887300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While I somehow believe you, your comment is also circular reasoning. ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While I somehow believe you , your comment is also circular reasoning .
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I somehow believe you, your comment is also circular reasoning.
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384790</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267880880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sounds a little excessive for "fraud by another Newegg customer."  Another customer would at least have had real stickers (from the original box).</p><p>In fact it reminds me of a childhood experience.  Back when Final Fantasy "II" came out for the SNES, I bought it at Toys R Us.  It was shrink-wrapped and everything.  When I opened it, instead of a cartridge it had a bolt with a couple nuts screwed on so it would weigh the same as a cartridge.  Fortunately, the manager was willing to swap it out for me--but from then on, I always opened my cartridges at the register after paying.  Considering the shrinkwrap and the contents of the box, to this day I suspect a factory worker took home a little souveneir... but who knows?</p><p>Hopefully Newegg follows through, I'd be interested to know what happened here.  At the very least I imagine they will be inspecting their shipments a little more closely for a while.  I buy from them all the time, they have a great reputation, and I doubt they are doing to ignore these claims (whether we hear about it or not).</p></div><p>That's freaking uncanny.  When I bought A Link to the Past at Toys R Us, I opened the box in the parking lot and found two bolts instead of a cartridge.</p><p>Come to think of it, years later I crunched down onto a much smaller bolt in a soft taco at Taco Bell.  Is bolt-related crime this common in everyone else's life?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds a little excessive for " fraud by another Newegg customer .
" Another customer would at least have had real stickers ( from the original box ) .In fact it reminds me of a childhood experience .
Back when Final Fantasy " II " came out for the SNES , I bought it at Toys R Us .
It was shrink-wrapped and everything .
When I opened it , instead of a cartridge it had a bolt with a couple nuts screwed on so it would weigh the same as a cartridge .
Fortunately , the manager was willing to swap it out for me--but from then on , I always opened my cartridges at the register after paying .
Considering the shrinkwrap and the contents of the box , to this day I suspect a factory worker took home a little souveneir... but who knows ? Hopefully Newegg follows through , I 'd be interested to know what happened here .
At the very least I imagine they will be inspecting their shipments a little more closely for a while .
I buy from them all the time , they have a great reputation , and I doubt they are doing to ignore these claims ( whether we hear about it or not ) .That 's freaking uncanny .
When I bought A Link to the Past at Toys R Us , I opened the box in the parking lot and found two bolts instead of a cartridge.Come to think of it , years later I crunched down onto a much smaller bolt in a soft taco at Taco Bell .
Is bolt-related crime this common in everyone else 's life ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds a little excessive for "fraud by another Newegg customer.
"  Another customer would at least have had real stickers (from the original box).In fact it reminds me of a childhood experience.
Back when Final Fantasy "II" came out for the SNES, I bought it at Toys R Us.
It was shrink-wrapped and everything.
When I opened it, instead of a cartridge it had a bolt with a couple nuts screwed on so it would weigh the same as a cartridge.
Fortunately, the manager was willing to swap it out for me--but from then on, I always opened my cartridges at the register after paying.
Considering the shrinkwrap and the contents of the box, to this day I suspect a factory worker took home a little souveneir... but who knows?Hopefully Newegg follows through, I'd be interested to know what happened here.
At the very least I imagine they will be inspecting their shipments a little more closely for a while.
I buy from them all the time, they have a great reputation, and I doubt they are doing to ignore these claims (whether we hear about it or not).That's freaking uncanny.
When I bought A Link to the Past at Toys R Us, I opened the box in the parking lot and found two bolts instead of a cartridge.Come to think of it, years later I crunched down onto a much smaller bolt in a soft taco at Taco Bell.
Is bolt-related crime this common in everyone else's life?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384476</id>
	<title>Been a newegg.com customer for a long time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267878180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is no way they are directly involved and there is no way they won't make good on the substitute goods.  NewEgg will likely ship out replacement processors to those who got fakes and deal with the matter themselves.  From all my experiences with them, they have given me 0.00 trouble when dealing with a return or exchange.  There are few companies I recommend to anyone, but newegg is one of them.  There will be no "egg" on their faces when this is all settled.  Above everything else, newegg values its reputation and treats its customers right.</p><p>(Should they not send replacement processors to the customers, I will presume there is good reason... they have always treated me well.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no way they are directly involved and there is no way they wo n't make good on the substitute goods .
NewEgg will likely ship out replacement processors to those who got fakes and deal with the matter themselves .
From all my experiences with them , they have given me 0.00 trouble when dealing with a return or exchange .
There are few companies I recommend to anyone , but newegg is one of them .
There will be no " egg " on their faces when this is all settled .
Above everything else , newegg values its reputation and treats its customers right .
( Should they not send replacement processors to the customers , I will presume there is good reason... they have always treated me well .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no way they are directly involved and there is no way they won't make good on the substitute goods.
NewEgg will likely ship out replacement processors to those who got fakes and deal with the matter themselves.
From all my experiences with them, they have given me 0.00 trouble when dealing with a return or exchange.
There are few companies I recommend to anyone, but newegg is one of them.
There will be no "egg" on their faces when this is all settled.
Above everything else, newegg values its reputation and treats its customers right.
(Should they not send replacement processors to the customers, I will presume there is good reason... they have always treated me well.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384462</id>
	<title>easy way to tell a fake</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267878000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fire up Excel and open any spreadsheet that has a fair amount of numeric calculation.  If results greater than 65535 are shown as "#MANY", then you most likely have one of the fake Intel chips.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fire up Excel and open any spreadsheet that has a fair amount of numeric calculation .
If results greater than 65535 are shown as " # MANY " , then you most likely have one of the fake Intel chips .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fire up Excel and open any spreadsheet that has a fair amount of numeric calculation.
If results greater than 65535 are shown as "#MANY", then you most likely have one of the fake Intel chips.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384486</id>
	<title>Huh</title>
	<author>The MAZZTer</author>
	<datestamp>1267878240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Guess it's a good thing I opted for a better GFX card instead and went with an i5...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Guess it 's a good thing I opted for a better GFX card instead and went with an i5.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guess it's a good thing I opted for a better GFX card instead and went with an i5...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385316</id>
	<title>How do you create a fake CPU?</title>
	<author>Billly Gates</author>
	<datestamp>1267885080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They would not be worth $650 if it were easy and simple to do.</p><p>Are they defective or old Core2Duos?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They would not be worth $ 650 if it were easy and simple to do.Are they defective or old Core2Duos ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They would not be worth $650 if it were easy and simple to do.Are they defective or old Core2Duos?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384586</id>
	<title>Re:I won't buy from newegg any more.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267879080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had exactly opposite experience. Ordered a $200 motherboard last year, as "open box" item its price was reduced to $85. Was very surprised to receive a completely new motherboard (packaging, no seals broken, completely untouched). Figured that they ran out of "open box" items and must have shipped new items to keep customers happy. I will ALWAYS buy from them - they care about their customers, not just about their pockets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had exactly opposite experience .
Ordered a $ 200 motherboard last year , as " open box " item its price was reduced to $ 85 .
Was very surprised to receive a completely new motherboard ( packaging , no seals broken , completely untouched ) .
Figured that they ran out of " open box " items and must have shipped new items to keep customers happy .
I will ALWAYS buy from them - they care about their customers , not just about their pockets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had exactly opposite experience.
Ordered a $200 motherboard last year, as "open box" item its price was reduced to $85.
Was very surprised to receive a completely new motherboard (packaging, no seals broken, completely untouched).
Figured that they ran out of "open box" items and must have shipped new items to keep customers happy.
I will ALWAYS buy from them - they care about their customers, not just about their pockets.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384572</id>
	<title>Re:I won't buy from newegg any more.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267878960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe if you weren't such a cheapskate to buy the open box item instead of the regular one, you wouldn't have gotten burned.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe if you were n't such a cheapskate to buy the open box item instead of the regular one , you would n't have gotten burned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe if you weren't such a cheapskate to buy the open box item instead of the regular one, you wouldn't have gotten burned.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386410</id>
	<title>Re:Not me!</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1267895640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>SARAH PALIN WILL NOT HAVE SEX WITH YOU.</p></div><p>Bill Clinton set the bar other politicians have to reach.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>SARAH PALIN WILL NOT HAVE SEX WITH YOU.Bill Clinton set the bar other politicians have to reach .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SARAH PALIN WILL NOT HAVE SEX WITH YOU.Bill Clinton set the bar other politicians have to reach.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385658</id>
	<title>Re:Reputation</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1267887900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or in short: Humanity is a society of trust-relationships. News at 11.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or in short : Humanity is a society of trust-relationships .
News at 11. ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or in short: Humanity is a society of trust-relationships.
News at 11. ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384596</id>
	<title>and your worried about counterfeit TUNES?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267879140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ya like this is what they really should be focusing on organized CRIME<br>not some kid downloading a music or tv episode.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ya like this is what they really should be focusing on organized CRIMEnot some kid downloading a music or tv episode .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ya like this is what they really should be focusing on organized CRIMEnot some kid downloading a music or tv episode.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387178</id>
	<title>Re:I blame the Chinese because ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267905000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Coincidence?  Newegg just announced they are increasing investment in China.<br><a href="http://www.jlmpacificepoch.com/newsstories?id=1622996\_0\_5\_0\_M" title="jlmpacificepoch.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.jlmpacificepoch.com/newsstories?id=1622996\_0\_5\_0\_M</a> [jlmpacificepoch.com]<br>I wonder if they will offering quality electronic products from Soony, Conon, and Panasunic in Beijing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Coincidence ?
Newegg just announced they are increasing investment in China.http : //www.jlmpacificepoch.com/newsstories ? id = 1622996 \ _0 \ _5 \ _0 \ _M [ jlmpacificepoch.com ] I wonder if they will offering quality electronic products from Soony , Conon , and Panasunic in Beijing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Coincidence?
Newegg just announced they are increasing investment in China.http://www.jlmpacificepoch.com/newsstories?id=1622996\_0\_5\_0\_M [jlmpacificepoch.com]I wonder if they will offering quality electronic products from Soony, Conon, and Panasunic in Beijing?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31425104</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268230920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They probably figured that gamers would be more entertained and less likely to return the package if it contained a couple of bolts instead of E.T.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They probably figured that gamers would be more entertained and less likely to return the package if it contained a couple of bolts instead of E.T .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They probably figured that gamers would be more entertained and less likely to return the package if it contained a couple of bolts instead of E.T.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385046</id>
	<title>Re:My swap meet story</title>
	<author>nedlohs</author>
	<datestamp>1267883160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You didn't buy one too have a look-see?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You did n't buy one too have a look-see ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You didn't buy one too have a look-see?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384932</id>
	<title>Re:Reputation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267882080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I see it more as careful marketing.  New Egg is The Geek store.  In my observation they are no more or less legitimate than Fry's or Tiger Direct.  All three operate to minimize cost to the customer, and sometimes when one does that things go wrong.  At the minimum. one attracts customers that are only interesting in price.  Such customers will inevitably cause problems, which is why it is better to shop for service than price, when possible.
<p>
I would think that it is not completely New Eggs fault.  I am sure they found they source of product at a ridiculously low price, and too advantage of it.  Perhaps they were told it fell off the back of the truck. Perhaps it was a wholesale clearance.  In any case, they were taken in by the fraud, and purposefully or not, perpetrated similar fraud on their customers.  It is now up to them to take responsibility for the actions, not balme someone else.
</p><p>
There is nothing that makes me trust some one less than when they blame someone else.  It is like a bank that once told me it was the partners responsibility to monitor an advertised program.  The materials had the banks name on the materials, the bank should be responsible.  If the bank is just a clearinghouse, if New Egg is just a company that takes and then asks others to fulfill orders, why are we paying either?
</p><p>
Given the unprecedented level of forgiveness for such fraudulent behavior without a compelling explanation, it just had to be said.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I see it more as careful marketing .
New Egg is The Geek store .
In my observation they are no more or less legitimate than Fry 's or Tiger Direct .
All three operate to minimize cost to the customer , and sometimes when one does that things go wrong .
At the minimum .
one attracts customers that are only interesting in price .
Such customers will inevitably cause problems , which is why it is better to shop for service than price , when possible .
I would think that it is not completely New Eggs fault .
I am sure they found they source of product at a ridiculously low price , and too advantage of it .
Perhaps they were told it fell off the back of the truck .
Perhaps it was a wholesale clearance .
In any case , they were taken in by the fraud , and purposefully or not , perpetrated similar fraud on their customers .
It is now up to them to take responsibility for the actions , not balme someone else .
There is nothing that makes me trust some one less than when they blame someone else .
It is like a bank that once told me it was the partners responsibility to monitor an advertised program .
The materials had the banks name on the materials , the bank should be responsible .
If the bank is just a clearinghouse , if New Egg is just a company that takes and then asks others to fulfill orders , why are we paying either ?
Given the unprecedented level of forgiveness for such fraudulent behavior without a compelling explanation , it just had to be said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see it more as careful marketing.
New Egg is The Geek store.
In my observation they are no more or less legitimate than Fry's or Tiger Direct.
All three operate to minimize cost to the customer, and sometimes when one does that things go wrong.
At the minimum.
one attracts customers that are only interesting in price.
Such customers will inevitably cause problems, which is why it is better to shop for service than price, when possible.
I would think that it is not completely New Eggs fault.
I am sure they found they source of product at a ridiculously low price, and too advantage of it.
Perhaps they were told it fell off the back of the truck.
Perhaps it was a wholesale clearance.
In any case, they were taken in by the fraud, and purposefully or not, perpetrated similar fraud on their customers.
It is now up to them to take responsibility for the actions, not balme someone else.
There is nothing that makes me trust some one less than when they blame someone else.
It is like a bank that once told me it was the partners responsibility to monitor an advertised program.
The materials had the banks name on the materials, the bank should be responsible.
If the bank is just a clearinghouse, if New Egg is just a company that takes and then asks others to fulfill orders, why are we paying either?
Given the unprecedented level of forgiveness for such fraudulent behavior without a compelling explanation, it just had to be said.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385268</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1267884720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your story reminds me of a teenage experience. In 1991, I had a small project that required small bolts and nuts, so I bought a few boxes of those at Home Depot. The boxes were shrink-wrapped and everything. When I opened one of the boxes, instead of bolts and nuts it had a few E.T. game cartridges in it so it  would weigh the same as bolts and nuts. Fortunately, the manager was willing to swap it out for me--but from then on, I always opened my bolts and nuts boxes at the register after paying. Considering the shrinkwrap and the contents of the box, to this day I suspect Atari was looking for creative ways to get rid of their failed game... but who knows?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your story reminds me of a teenage experience .
In 1991 , I had a small project that required small bolts and nuts , so I bought a few boxes of those at Home Depot .
The boxes were shrink-wrapped and everything .
When I opened one of the boxes , instead of bolts and nuts it had a few E.T .
game cartridges in it so it would weigh the same as bolts and nuts .
Fortunately , the manager was willing to swap it out for me--but from then on , I always opened my bolts and nuts boxes at the register after paying .
Considering the shrinkwrap and the contents of the box , to this day I suspect Atari was looking for creative ways to get rid of their failed game... but who knows ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your story reminds me of a teenage experience.
In 1991, I had a small project that required small bolts and nuts, so I bought a few boxes of those at Home Depot.
The boxes were shrink-wrapped and everything.
When I opened one of the boxes, instead of bolts and nuts it had a few E.T.
game cartridges in it so it  would weigh the same as bolts and nuts.
Fortunately, the manager was willing to swap it out for me--but from then on, I always opened my bolts and nuts boxes at the register after paying.
Considering the shrinkwrap and the contents of the box, to this day I suspect Atari was looking for creative ways to get rid of their failed game... but who knows?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387832</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>w0mprat</author>
	<datestamp>1267957860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Simplify: Grab the genuine product from the shelf and bolt.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Simplify : Grab the genuine product from the shelf and bolt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Simplify: Grab the genuine product from the shelf and bolt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384420</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267877640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Considering the shrinkwrap and the contents of the box, to this day I suspect a factory worker took home a little souveneir... but who knows?</p></div> </blockquote><p>I would think a factory worker could do it without troubling a customer like that.  More people than factory workers have access to shrinkwrapping machines, iirc, in the 1990s, some stores had them so they could sell returned games as new... but then a worker would steal a game and cover it up like this.  It's also entirely possible that a previous customer returned the game like that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering the shrinkwrap and the contents of the box , to this day I suspect a factory worker took home a little souveneir... but who knows ?
I would think a factory worker could do it without troubling a customer like that .
More people than factory workers have access to shrinkwrapping machines , iirc , in the 1990s , some stores had them so they could sell returned games as new... but then a worker would steal a game and cover it up like this .
It 's also entirely possible that a previous customer returned the game like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering the shrinkwrap and the contents of the box, to this day I suspect a factory worker took home a little souveneir... but who knows?
I would think a factory worker could do it without troubling a customer like that.
More people than factory workers have access to shrinkwrapping machines, iirc, in the 1990s, some stores had them so they could sell returned games as new... but then a worker would steal a game and cover it up like this.
It's also entirely possible that a previous customer returned the game like that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385834</id>
	<title>Re:no way newegg's fault</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1267889820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to mention they don't really stand to gain anything anyway. It's not like their customers won't all realize something's wrong and return them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention they do n't really stand to gain anything anyway .
It 's not like their customers wo n't all realize something 's wrong and return them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention they don't really stand to gain anything anyway.
It's not like their customers won't all realize something's wrong and return them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384806</id>
	<title>Of course it's newegg's fault</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267881000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's forgiveable if they make it right and apologize, but they're the seller.  If their supplier or shipper betrayed them they screwed up by selecting that supplier and not watching them closely enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's forgiveable if they make it right and apologize , but they 're the seller .
If their supplier or shipper betrayed them they screwed up by selecting that supplier and not watching them closely enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's forgiveable if they make it right and apologize, but they're the seller.
If their supplier or shipper betrayed them they screwed up by selecting that supplier and not watching them closely enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384444</id>
	<title>no way newegg's fault</title>
	<author>crazybit</author>
	<datestamp>1267877820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>They won't shoot themselves on their foot like this. As someone said, problem must be in some other part of the distribution chain.<br> <br>Newegg's reputation is a critical part of their business, people buy on newegg because they expect that - on these type of situations - newegg won't screw the customer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They wo n't shoot themselves on their foot like this .
As someone said , problem must be in some other part of the distribution chain .
Newegg 's reputation is a critical part of their business , people buy on newegg because they expect that - on these type of situations - newegg wo n't screw the customer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They won't shoot themselves on their foot like this.
As someone said, problem must be in some other part of the distribution chain.
Newegg's reputation is a critical part of their business, people buy on newegg because they expect that - on these type of situations - newegg won't screw the customer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386282</id>
	<title>Re:From Intels Elbonian manufacturing plant</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1267894140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This is what Intel gets from assembling these boxes in Elbonia.</p></div></blockquote><p>

I cant speak for Intel but AMD's Fabrication is in Germany and assembly is done in Malaysia. Malaysia is not exactly like china, for an SE Asian nation they are fairly well off (they have lots of oil) thus work for more then US$0.17 a day. An educated Malay will easily get 900 Ringit a month (34 Ringit a day on a 6 day week, about US$9). Assembly of processors is a bit more involved then hard drives and require a more skilled (and careful) workforce and boxing needs to be done at the factory for QA reasons (and it's cheaper then having a separate facility just for boxing).<br> <br>

This is likely to be an organised scam from outside Intel, a separate group of criminals has substituted a load of genuine Intel chips for fakes and sold them on. They've sold boxes worth US$2 for the wholesale price of an i7. Blaming Intel is premature as it's highly likely that Intel has no part in this.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is what Intel gets from assembling these boxes in Elbonia .
I cant speak for Intel but AMD 's Fabrication is in Germany and assembly is done in Malaysia .
Malaysia is not exactly like china , for an SE Asian nation they are fairly well off ( they have lots of oil ) thus work for more then US $ 0.17 a day .
An educated Malay will easily get 900 Ringit a month ( 34 Ringit a day on a 6 day week , about US $ 9 ) .
Assembly of processors is a bit more involved then hard drives and require a more skilled ( and careful ) workforce and boxing needs to be done at the factory for QA reasons ( and it 's cheaper then having a separate facility just for boxing ) .
This is likely to be an organised scam from outside Intel , a separate group of criminals has substituted a load of genuine Intel chips for fakes and sold them on .
They 've sold boxes worth US $ 2 for the wholesale price of an i7 .
Blaming Intel is premature as it 's highly likely that Intel has no part in this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is what Intel gets from assembling these boxes in Elbonia.
I cant speak for Intel but AMD's Fabrication is in Germany and assembly is done in Malaysia.
Malaysia is not exactly like china, for an SE Asian nation they are fairly well off (they have lots of oil) thus work for more then US$0.17 a day.
An educated Malay will easily get 900 Ringit a month (34 Ringit a day on a 6 day week, about US$9).
Assembly of processors is a bit more involved then hard drives and require a more skilled (and careful) workforce and boxing needs to be done at the factory for QA reasons (and it's cheaper then having a separate facility just for boxing).
This is likely to be an organised scam from outside Intel, a separate group of criminals has substituted a load of genuine Intel chips for fakes and sold them on.
They've sold boxes worth US$2 for the wholesale price of an i7.
Blaming Intel is premature as it's highly likely that Intel has no part in this.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385708</id>
	<title>Please Don't Restock This!</title>
	<author>Bruce Perens</author>
	<datestamp>1267888500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Twice recently I've found someone else's obsolete merchandise in boxes of purportedly new equipment from a hardware store. One was a 10-year-old smoke detector in a box for a different model, one was a non-combination arc-fault circuit breaker instead of the combination arc-fault model now required by electrical codes. In both cases I assume this was a previous return by someone defrauding the store. Both merchants were happy to take the merchandise back. In the Home Depot I had to tell the sales clerk "please don't restock this", and then she put a sticker on the box.<p>
What bothers me is that in both cases, the bad merchandise could have compromised someone's safety.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Twice recently I 've found someone else 's obsolete merchandise in boxes of purportedly new equipment from a hardware store .
One was a 10-year-old smoke detector in a box for a different model , one was a non-combination arc-fault circuit breaker instead of the combination arc-fault model now required by electrical codes .
In both cases I assume this was a previous return by someone defrauding the store .
Both merchants were happy to take the merchandise back .
In the Home Depot I had to tell the sales clerk " please do n't restock this " , and then she put a sticker on the box .
What bothers me is that in both cases , the bad merchandise could have compromised someone 's safety .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twice recently I've found someone else's obsolete merchandise in boxes of purportedly new equipment from a hardware store.
One was a 10-year-old smoke detector in a box for a different model, one was a non-combination arc-fault circuit breaker instead of the combination arc-fault model now required by electrical codes.
In both cases I assume this was a previous return by someone defrauding the store.
Both merchants were happy to take the merchandise back.
In the Home Depot I had to tell the sales clerk "please don't restock this", and then she put a sticker on the box.
What bothers me is that in both cases, the bad merchandise could have compromised someone's safety.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31396152</id>
	<title>sorry for the repost</title>
	<author>metaforest</author>
	<datestamp>1267972980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And the self-reply<br>browser glitch....  I didn't think the first one made it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And the self-replybrowser glitch.... I did n't think the first one made it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the self-replybrowser glitch....  I didn't think the first one made it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385008</id>
	<title>Re:Not buying Neweggs explanation</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1267882740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or its what newegg was told, and they are just passing it along, without questioning the sanity of the excuse...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or its what newegg was told , and they are just passing it along , without questioning the sanity of the excuse.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or its what newegg was told, and they are just passing it along, without questioning the sanity of the excuse...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31388596</id>
	<title>overclocking</title>
	<author>BigMike</author>
	<datestamp>1267969140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any word on how well they overclock?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any word on how well they overclock ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any word on how well they overclock?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387136</id>
	<title>Re:My swap meet story</title>
	<author>daverk</author>
	<datestamp>1267904460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually I saw this pallet of Core I7 processor boxes too, they were not fake processors, just the factory heat sinks &amp; fans. The boxes were all ripped open and processor had already been removed. They were selling for $5 each. I bought one of the i7 975 extreme ones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually I saw this pallet of Core I7 processor boxes too , they were not fake processors , just the factory heat sinks &amp; fans .
The boxes were all ripped open and processor had already been removed .
They were selling for $ 5 each .
I bought one of the i7 975 extreme ones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually I saw this pallet of Core I7 processor boxes too, they were not fake processors, just the factory heat sinks &amp; fans.
The boxes were all ripped open and processor had already been removed.
They were selling for $5 each.
I bought one of the i7 975 extreme ones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385628</id>
	<title>Re:Newegg has responded</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267887420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok I had to laugh at twitter.  Newegg wrote one sentence and had to split it up over two posts.  Now I remember why I don't use twitter.</p><p>-- gid</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok I had to laugh at twitter .
Newegg wrote one sentence and had to split it up over two posts .
Now I remember why I do n't use twitter.-- gid</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok I had to laugh at twitter.
Newegg wrote one sentence and had to split it up over two posts.
Now I remember why I don't use twitter.-- gid</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385696</id>
	<title>Re:Reputation</title>
	<author>ChrisMaple</author>
	<datestamp>1267888380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's been 10 years since I lived near Fry's, but back then they had a reputation for putting stuff returned as defective back on the shelves untested. Fry's is a lot of fun and has some good deals, but it's strictly <i>buyer beware</i>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's been 10 years since I lived near Fry 's , but back then they had a reputation for putting stuff returned as defective back on the shelves untested .
Fry 's is a lot of fun and has some good deals , but it 's strictly buyer beware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's been 10 years since I lived near Fry's, but back then they had a reputation for putting stuff returned as defective back on the shelves untested.
Fry's is a lot of fun and has some good deals, but it's strictly buyer beware.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385028</id>
	<title>Re:Newegg has responded</title>
	<author>shadowofwind</author>
	<datestamp>1267882920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF is happening to our country?  Perhaps its not really getting worse, but damn near everyone I've dealt with professionally for the past several years has upon closer inspection proved to be a pathologically lying weasel.  There must be real engineering getting done somewhere:  the stuff we buy that actually works can't ALL be made in China now can it?</p><p>I thought that learning to tell the truth was supposed to be a stage we go through in childhood, not something that most of the population just learns to emulate so that they can try to pass themselves off as the small percentage that's honest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF is happening to our country ?
Perhaps its not really getting worse , but damn near everyone I 've dealt with professionally for the past several years has upon closer inspection proved to be a pathologically lying weasel .
There must be real engineering getting done somewhere : the stuff we buy that actually works ca n't ALL be made in China now can it ? I thought that learning to tell the truth was supposed to be a stage we go through in childhood , not something that most of the population just learns to emulate so that they can try to pass themselves off as the small percentage that 's honest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF is happening to our country?
Perhaps its not really getting worse, but damn near everyone I've dealt with professionally for the past several years has upon closer inspection proved to be a pathologically lying weasel.
There must be real engineering getting done somewhere:  the stuff we buy that actually works can't ALL be made in China now can it?I thought that learning to tell the truth was supposed to be a stage we go through in childhood, not something that most of the population just learns to emulate so that they can try to pass themselves off as the small percentage that's honest.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384826</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387912</id>
	<title>Re:no way newegg's fault</title>
	<author>w0mprat</author>
	<datestamp>1267959360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes it's most likely to be a switcheroo in a warehouse somewhere. There's a good chance of inside help with the fake goods substitution.
<br> <br>
A whole pallet of core i5's would approach $100,000 in value.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes it 's most likely to be a switcheroo in a warehouse somewhere .
There 's a good chance of inside help with the fake goods substitution .
A whole pallet of core i5 's would approach $ 100,000 in value .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes it's most likely to be a switcheroo in a warehouse somewhere.
There's a good chance of inside help with the fake goods substitution.
A whole pallet of core i5's would approach $100,000 in value.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31390352</id>
	<title>Their return policies stink</title>
	<author>hellfire</author>
	<datestamp>1267980480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I never trust an outfit that has return policies like new Egg.  Unless you prove that the item is defective, and note you have to find some way of proving that it's defective over the internet, especially after you have already returned it, they charge you a 15\% restocking fee.  It's not illegal, but it's still bullshit.  I need to trust the products are quality and that if they aren't the merchant is willing to stand behind them.</p><p>I bought an SD chip from they a while ago.  It didn't work.  So I returned it saying it was defective and got a new one, which worked.  Well they charged me the 15\% restocking fee even though I said it was defective.  I later bought an external hard drive case, that to this day is a little flakey, but it was one of the higher end cases that supposedly got good reviews.  The risk of the 15\% restock fee was not worth it.</p><p>That's not good customer service.  I'm surprised to this day how much good press it gets from some slashdotters, but they don't get my business any more.  I don't trust their customer service or their quality.  I know this is anecdotal but I'm just throwing my $.02 in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I never trust an outfit that has return policies like new Egg .
Unless you prove that the item is defective , and note you have to find some way of proving that it 's defective over the internet , especially after you have already returned it , they charge you a 15 \ % restocking fee .
It 's not illegal , but it 's still bullshit .
I need to trust the products are quality and that if they are n't the merchant is willing to stand behind them.I bought an SD chip from they a while ago .
It did n't work .
So I returned it saying it was defective and got a new one , which worked .
Well they charged me the 15 \ % restocking fee even though I said it was defective .
I later bought an external hard drive case , that to this day is a little flakey , but it was one of the higher end cases that supposedly got good reviews .
The risk of the 15 \ % restock fee was not worth it.That 's not good customer service .
I 'm surprised to this day how much good press it gets from some slashdotters , but they do n't get my business any more .
I do n't trust their customer service or their quality .
I know this is anecdotal but I 'm just throwing my $ .02 in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never trust an outfit that has return policies like new Egg.
Unless you prove that the item is defective, and note you have to find some way of proving that it's defective over the internet, especially after you have already returned it, they charge you a 15\% restocking fee.
It's not illegal, but it's still bullshit.
I need to trust the products are quality and that if they aren't the merchant is willing to stand behind them.I bought an SD chip from they a while ago.
It didn't work.
So I returned it saying it was defective and got a new one, which worked.
Well they charged me the 15\% restocking fee even though I said it was defective.
I later bought an external hard drive case, that to this day is a little flakey, but it was one of the higher end cases that supposedly got good reviews.
The risk of the 15\% restock fee was not worth it.That's not good customer service.
I'm surprised to this day how much good press it gets from some slashdotters, but they don't get my business any more.
I don't trust their customer service or their quality.
I know this is anecdotal but I'm just throwing my $.02 in.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384316</id>
	<title>Not me!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267876800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I buy AMD!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I buy AMD !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I buy AMD!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31391000</id>
	<title>Re:My swap meet story</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267984140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At a guess: The person selling them probably wanted to sell them "legitimately" for more than the heatsink/fan was really worth, so he could make a profit.  The purchaser would then fraudulently resell them as "genuine" processors and make another profit.  The guy you spoke to would disclaim any knowledge of the fraud whilst happily pocketing the cash.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At a guess : The person selling them probably wanted to sell them " legitimately " for more than the heatsink/fan was really worth , so he could make a profit .
The purchaser would then fraudulently resell them as " genuine " processors and make another profit .
The guy you spoke to would disclaim any knowledge of the fraud whilst happily pocketing the cash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At a guess: The person selling them probably wanted to sell them "legitimately" for more than the heatsink/fan was really worth, so he could make a profit.
The purchaser would then fraudulently resell them as "genuine" processors and make another profit.
The guy you spoke to would disclaim any knowledge of the fraud whilst happily pocketing the cash.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387898</id>
	<title>I got ripped of at Best Buy</title>
	<author>okmijnuhb</author>
	<datestamp>1267959120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There was a hard drive in an open box for a ridiculously low price. I bought it without checking the contents, and got home to find an ancient hard drive in the box. The store refused a refund and I sued. <br>
I suspect employee theft plus collusion with the store, or else how was the drive on display for so cheap?<br>
Fuck you Best Buy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There was a hard drive in an open box for a ridiculously low price .
I bought it without checking the contents , and got home to find an ancient hard drive in the box .
The store refused a refund and I sued .
I suspect employee theft plus collusion with the store , or else how was the drive on display for so cheap ?
Fuck you Best Buy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was a hard drive in an open box for a ridiculously low price.
I bought it without checking the contents, and got home to find an ancient hard drive in the box.
The store refused a refund and I sued.
I suspect employee theft plus collusion with the store, or else how was the drive on display for so cheap?
Fuck you Best Buy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385888</id>
	<title>Re:Not buying Neweggs explanation</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1267890360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are likely allowing one of their vendors to save face.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are likely allowing one of their vendors to save face .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are likely allowing one of their vendors to save face.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31391172</id>
	<title>The real question ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267985040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>should not be what the fan was made out of, but how well did they perform ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>should not be what the fan was made out of , but how well did they perform ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>should not be what the fan was made out of, but how well did they perform ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384744</id>
	<title>Not buying Neweggs explanation</title>
	<author>viking80</author>
	<datestamp>1267880400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Newegg is aware of a shipping error that occurred with certain recent orders of the Intel Core i7-920 CPU. After investigating the issue internally it appears one of our long term partners mistakenly shipped a small number of demo boxes instead of functional units. Our customer service team has already begun proactively reaching out to the affected customers. In line with our commitment to ensure total customer satisfaction, we are doing everything in our power to resolve the issue as soon as possible and with the least amount of inconvenience to our customers."</p><p>Why would Intel make a demo box with multiple spelling errors like a poor chinese user manual, and include stapled blank paper and broken plastic parts, and then get it mixed up in the mfg. channel? NO CHANCE. PERIOD.</p><p>This is obviously corporate communication lies. I wonder why Newegg, with a large set of loyal customers feel the need to lie so blatantly to its customers. Do they think they are idiots, or is lying just accepted?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Newegg is aware of a shipping error that occurred with certain recent orders of the Intel Core i7-920 CPU .
After investigating the issue internally it appears one of our long term partners mistakenly shipped a small number of demo boxes instead of functional units .
Our customer service team has already begun proactively reaching out to the affected customers .
In line with our commitment to ensure total customer satisfaction , we are doing everything in our power to resolve the issue as soon as possible and with the least amount of inconvenience to our customers .
" Why would Intel make a demo box with multiple spelling errors like a poor chinese user manual , and include stapled blank paper and broken plastic parts , and then get it mixed up in the mfg .
channel ? NO CHANCE .
PERIOD.This is obviously corporate communication lies .
I wonder why Newegg , with a large set of loyal customers feel the need to lie so blatantly to its customers .
Do they think they are idiots , or is lying just accepted ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Newegg is aware of a shipping error that occurred with certain recent orders of the Intel Core i7-920 CPU.
After investigating the issue internally it appears one of our long term partners mistakenly shipped a small number of demo boxes instead of functional units.
Our customer service team has already begun proactively reaching out to the affected customers.
In line with our commitment to ensure total customer satisfaction, we are doing everything in our power to resolve the issue as soon as possible and with the least amount of inconvenience to our customers.
"Why would Intel make a demo box with multiple spelling errors like a poor chinese user manual, and include stapled blank paper and broken plastic parts, and then get it mixed up in the mfg.
channel? NO CHANCE.
PERIOD.This is obviously corporate communication lies.
I wonder why Newegg, with a large set of loyal customers feel the need to lie so blatantly to its customers.
Do they think they are idiots, or is lying just accepted?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385038</id>
	<title>Re:Not buying Neweggs explanation</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1267883100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, it makes perfect sense. Just yesterday, a cashier stopped me and called the police, claiming I was using counterfeit money. "No, no" I said, "I just mistakenly gave you some demo money. Haven't you ever heard of demo money? It looks almost exactly like the real thing, and used for demonstrations." Unfortunately the police didn't believe me either.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it makes perfect sense .
Just yesterday , a cashier stopped me and called the police , claiming I was using counterfeit money .
" No , no " I said , " I just mistakenly gave you some demo money .
Have n't you ever heard of demo money ?
It looks almost exactly like the real thing , and used for demonstrations .
" Unfortunately the police did n't believe me either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it makes perfect sense.
Just yesterday, a cashier stopped me and called the police, claiming I was using counterfeit money.
"No, no" I said, "I just mistakenly gave you some demo money.
Haven't you ever heard of demo money?
It looks almost exactly like the real thing, and used for demonstrations.
" Unfortunately the police didn't believe me either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387394</id>
	<title>Why not check for GenuineIntel?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267994220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just fire up calc and do:  4195835 * 3145727 / 3145727</p><p>You should get 4195579 if you have a GenuineIntel processor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just fire up calc and do : 4195835 * 3145727 / 3145727You should get 4195579 if you have a GenuineIntel processor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just fire up calc and do:  4195835 * 3145727 / 3145727You should get 4195579 if you have a GenuineIntel processor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384688</id>
	<title>hey, Newegg</title>
	<author>ffflala</author>
	<datestamp>1267879980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Newegg, you're one of the online businesses that I've actually come to respect. I've had excellent customer service from you in the past. This is a problem.</p><p>Radio silence does not cut it here. This is what I need to hear from you:</p><p>"Dear customers: We have been deeply concerned to hear reports that a few of our customers have received bogus goods after making purchases on Newegg. We have determined that the complaints are legitimate. We rigorously attempt to maintain the highest quality. Despite our best efforts to maintain the highest level of quality control, some customers have in fact received fake goods. This is absolutely unacceptable. We will taking every step to reimburse the affected customers promptly. We will also identify what went wrong here, and will ensure that this will not happen again. Your trust is important to us. We sincerely hope that you find our responses acceptable, and encourage you to contact us with any suggestions, concerns, or tips. Also, we're having a 30\% off sale on i7 920 processors, effective immediately."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Newegg , you 're one of the online businesses that I 've actually come to respect .
I 've had excellent customer service from you in the past .
This is a problem.Radio silence does not cut it here .
This is what I need to hear from you : " Dear customers : We have been deeply concerned to hear reports that a few of our customers have received bogus goods after making purchases on Newegg .
We have determined that the complaints are legitimate .
We rigorously attempt to maintain the highest quality .
Despite our best efforts to maintain the highest level of quality control , some customers have in fact received fake goods .
This is absolutely unacceptable .
We will taking every step to reimburse the affected customers promptly .
We will also identify what went wrong here , and will ensure that this will not happen again .
Your trust is important to us .
We sincerely hope that you find our responses acceptable , and encourage you to contact us with any suggestions , concerns , or tips .
Also , we 're having a 30 \ % off sale on i7 920 processors , effective immediately .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Newegg, you're one of the online businesses that I've actually come to respect.
I've had excellent customer service from you in the past.
This is a problem.Radio silence does not cut it here.
This is what I need to hear from you:"Dear customers: We have been deeply concerned to hear reports that a few of our customers have received bogus goods after making purchases on Newegg.
We have determined that the complaints are legitimate.
We rigorously attempt to maintain the highest quality.
Despite our best efforts to maintain the highest level of quality control, some customers have in fact received fake goods.
This is absolutely unacceptable.
We will taking every step to reimburse the affected customers promptly.
We will also identify what went wrong here, and will ensure that this will not happen again.
Your trust is important to us.
We sincerely hope that you find our responses acceptable, and encourage you to contact us with any suggestions, concerns, or tips.
Also, we're having a 30\% off sale on i7 920 processors, effective immediately.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386530</id>
	<title>Re:no way newegg's fault</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267897320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>100\% agreed.   Newegg WILL make this right for all the customers.</p><p>They are just outstanding at customer service.</p><p>Which is why i'll always buy from them.  No matter what kind of broken junk i sometimes get.  Newegg has always made it right no matter what.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>100 \ % agreed .
Newegg WILL make this right for all the customers.They are just outstanding at customer service.Which is why i 'll always buy from them .
No matter what kind of broken junk i sometimes get .
Newegg has always made it right no matter what .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>100\% agreed.
Newegg WILL make this right for all the customers.They are just outstanding at customer service.Which is why i'll always buy from them.
No matter what kind of broken junk i sometimes get.
Newegg has always made it right no matter what.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384754</id>
	<title>My swap meet story</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267880460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was at a swap meet a month ago and saw a *pallet* of Core I7 processors. I used Red Laser to scan the UPC codes (they were "Extreme" models selling for $650+ on the open market), and a quick volume computation (the pallet was about 12 high, about 20 horizontal each way) suggested that I was looking at about $3 million worth of processors.</p><p>Except, they weren't actual processors. According to the person selling them, they were "fake" processors, but the heatsinks and fans were real and could be used with other processors and motherboards.</p><p>Uh-huh. Carrying the original UPC codes. I'm still not sure what to make of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was at a swap meet a month ago and saw a * pallet * of Core I7 processors .
I used Red Laser to scan the UPC codes ( they were " Extreme " models selling for $ 650 + on the open market ) , and a quick volume computation ( the pallet was about 12 high , about 20 horizontal each way ) suggested that I was looking at about $ 3 million worth of processors.Except , they were n't actual processors .
According to the person selling them , they were " fake " processors , but the heatsinks and fans were real and could be used with other processors and motherboards.Uh-huh .
Carrying the original UPC codes .
I 'm still not sure what to make of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was at a swap meet a month ago and saw a *pallet* of Core I7 processors.
I used Red Laser to scan the UPC codes (they were "Extreme" models selling for $650+ on the open market), and a quick volume computation (the pallet was about 12 high, about 20 horizontal each way) suggested that I was looking at about $3 million worth of processors.Except, they weren't actual processors.
According to the person selling them, they were "fake" processors, but the heatsinks and fans were real and could be used with other processors and motherboards.Uh-huh.
Carrying the original UPC codes.
I'm still not sure what to make of it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385872</id>
	<title>Re:Not buying Neweggs explanation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267890240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Why would Intel make a demo box with multiple spelling errors like a poor chinese user manual, and include stapled blank paper and broken plastic parts, and then get it mixed up in the mfg. channel? NO CHANCE. PERIOD.</p></div></blockquote><p>You look like you need a shave.  There's a guy over there called Hanlon; you should ask him for his razor.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would Intel make a demo box with multiple spelling errors like a poor chinese user manual , and include stapled blank paper and broken plastic parts , and then get it mixed up in the mfg .
channel ? NO CHANCE .
PERIOD.You look like you need a shave .
There 's a guy over there called Hanlon ; you should ask him for his razor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would Intel make a demo box with multiple spelling errors like a poor chinese user manual, and include stapled blank paper and broken plastic parts, and then get it mixed up in the mfg.
channel? NO CHANCE.
PERIOD.You look like you need a shave.
There's a guy over there called Hanlon; you should ask him for his razor.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31401054</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1268066160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>E.T. game cartridges in it</p></div></blockquote><p>

Wow, they were too cheap to even weigh it down with a brick, huh?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>E.T .
game cartridges in it Wow , they were too cheap to even weigh it down with a brick , huh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>E.T.
game cartridges in it

Wow, they were too cheap to even weigh it down with a brick, huh?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31399434</id>
	<title>Re:hey, Newegg</title>
	<author>metaforest</author>
	<datestamp>1268055000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>our long term partners mistakenly shipped a small number of demo boxes instead of functional units.</p></div><p>That shit is a bald faced lie.</p><p>Intel has come out with a statement that contradicts this, and from the images suppled from the customers that have received these "Nigerian Core i7" packages, the box is not up to Intel's standards by any stretch of the imagination.   Why would Intel fake their own security seals, and allow embarrassingly bad spelling?  Add to that the low grade castings of the fan and chip...  Intel has reason to go getto on those materials.  IMO: Someone pulled a switch job on their supply lines somewhere between Intel and Newegg.   The real issue is that somehow this slipped past their ISO9000 Process QA and got into customer hands.  This is a major screw up for Intel's entire distribution chain.</p><p>Newegg is clearly following a misguided PR strategy for dealing with this disaster.   D&amp;H the alleged distributor who appears from early reports to be the upstream source of this supply stream contamination has taken a similarly misguided stance.  They are firing off Cease and Desist letters to the forums who broke the story of D &amp; H likely being involved.</p><p>Newegg needs to come clean...  D &amp; H needs to come clean...   They need to stop covering up and admit that they were not watching their supply lines well enough to prevent this crap getting to the end-users.   It's simple you admit to a weakness in process and move on from their.   This coverup crap just feeds the trolls and builds negative vibes...   So far only intel has been factual:  (paraphrasing)  [We didn't make that bullshit!  We are going to find out who did... **ITS CLOBBERIN' TIIIIME!!!!**]  |EOL|   Not a very informative statement.... However, it appears honest, and clear, that they care about solving the problem.</p><p>D&amp;H came out rattling their saber;  Newegg is blaming "demos" delivered by mistake.   Both approaches are disingenuous and patently insulting to the customers involved, and potential customers paying attention to the market.</p><p>Newegg has been getting a anecdotal bad rap for a long time...  their statement on this issue kind of validates those complaints now.  D &amp; H has been around for longer than most of us have been alive.... they should know better.</p><p>IMO: They got caught fappin' off when they should have been minding the store.  Now they lie about it.</p><p>Hmmm.. I've been pretty happy with Newegg and their service.  I've had nothing but good experiences in trading with them.  Now...  I'm not so sure I want to continue doing business with them.... Now that I see how they want to spin this crisis; I'm thinking maybe I have been lucky in my dealing with them so far.   I'm thinking I'll take my custom elsewhere.  YMMV</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>our long term partners mistakenly shipped a small number of demo boxes instead of functional units.That shit is a bald faced lie.Intel has come out with a statement that contradicts this , and from the images suppled from the customers that have received these " Nigerian Core i7 " packages , the box is not up to Intel 's standards by any stretch of the imagination .
Why would Intel fake their own security seals , and allow embarrassingly bad spelling ?
Add to that the low grade castings of the fan and chip... Intel has reason to go getto on those materials .
IMO : Someone pulled a switch job on their supply lines somewhere between Intel and Newegg .
The real issue is that somehow this slipped past their ISO9000 Process QA and got into customer hands .
This is a major screw up for Intel 's entire distribution chain.Newegg is clearly following a misguided PR strategy for dealing with this disaster .
D&amp;H the alleged distributor who appears from early reports to be the upstream source of this supply stream contamination has taken a similarly misguided stance .
They are firing off Cease and Desist letters to the forums who broke the story of D &amp; H likely being involved.Newegg needs to come clean... D &amp; H needs to come clean... They need to stop covering up and admit that they were not watching their supply lines well enough to prevent this crap getting to the end-users .
It 's simple you admit to a weakness in process and move on from their .
This coverup crap just feeds the trolls and builds negative vibes... So far only intel has been factual : ( paraphrasing ) [ We did n't make that bullshit !
We are going to find out who did... * * ITS CLOBBERIN ' TIIIIME ! ! ! !
* * ] | EOL | Not a very informative statement.... However , it appears honest , and clear , that they care about solving the problem.D&amp;H came out rattling their saber ; Newegg is blaming " demos " delivered by mistake .
Both approaches are disingenuous and patently insulting to the customers involved , and potential customers paying attention to the market.Newegg has been getting a anecdotal bad rap for a long time... their statement on this issue kind of validates those complaints now .
D &amp; H has been around for longer than most of us have been alive.... they should know better.IMO : They got caught fappin ' off when they should have been minding the store .
Now they lie about it.Hmmm.. I 've been pretty happy with Newegg and their service .
I 've had nothing but good experiences in trading with them .
Now... I 'm not so sure I want to continue doing business with them.... Now that I see how they want to spin this crisis ; I 'm thinking maybe I have been lucky in my dealing with them so far .
I 'm thinking I 'll take my custom elsewhere .
YMMV</tokentext>
<sentencetext>our long term partners mistakenly shipped a small number of demo boxes instead of functional units.That shit is a bald faced lie.Intel has come out with a statement that contradicts this, and from the images suppled from the customers that have received these "Nigerian Core i7" packages, the box is not up to Intel's standards by any stretch of the imagination.
Why would Intel fake their own security seals, and allow embarrassingly bad spelling?
Add to that the low grade castings of the fan and chip...  Intel has reason to go getto on those materials.
IMO: Someone pulled a switch job on their supply lines somewhere between Intel and Newegg.
The real issue is that somehow this slipped past their ISO9000 Process QA and got into customer hands.
This is a major screw up for Intel's entire distribution chain.Newegg is clearly following a misguided PR strategy for dealing with this disaster.
D&amp;H the alleged distributor who appears from early reports to be the upstream source of this supply stream contamination has taken a similarly misguided stance.
They are firing off Cease and Desist letters to the forums who broke the story of D &amp; H likely being involved.Newegg needs to come clean...  D &amp; H needs to come clean...   They need to stop covering up and admit that they were not watching their supply lines well enough to prevent this crap getting to the end-users.
It's simple you admit to a weakness in process and move on from their.
This coverup crap just feeds the trolls and builds negative vibes...   So far only intel has been factual:  (paraphrasing)  [We didn't make that bullshit!
We are going to find out who did... **ITS CLOBBERIN' TIIIIME!!!!
**]  |EOL|   Not a very informative statement.... However, it appears honest, and clear, that they care about solving the problem.D&amp;H came out rattling their saber;  Newegg is blaming "demos" delivered by mistake.
Both approaches are disingenuous and patently insulting to the customers involved, and potential customers paying attention to the market.Newegg has been getting a anecdotal bad rap for a long time...  their statement on this issue kind of validates those complaints now.
D &amp; H has been around for longer than most of us have been alive.... they should know better.IMO: They got caught fappin' off when they should have been minding the store.
Now they lie about it.Hmmm.. I've been pretty happy with Newegg and their service.
I've had nothing but good experiences in trading with them.
Now...  I'm not so sure I want to continue doing business with them.... Now that I see how they want to spin this crisis; I'm thinking maybe I have been lucky in my dealing with them so far.
I'm thinking I'll take my custom elsewhere.
YMMV
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385710</id>
	<title>Re:How do you create a fake CPU?</title>
	<author>AC-x</author>
	<datestamp>1267888560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're solid squares of aluminium made to look like CPUs, completely non-functional but I guess they look just real enough to fool the box packers. (I know this is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. but you could have at least looked at the pictures in the article!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're solid squares of aluminium made to look like CPUs , completely non-functional but I guess they look just real enough to fool the box packers .
( I know this is / .
but you could have at least looked at the pictures in the article !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're solid squares of aluminium made to look like CPUs, completely non-functional but I guess they look just real enough to fool the box packers.
(I know this is /.
but you could have at least looked at the pictures in the article!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386722</id>
	<title>Only surprised I don't see this more often</title>
	<author>FauxReal</author>
	<datestamp>1267899360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've seen similar things before but with other products, I once saw a Nikon Camera that upon opening the box you got a working camera, except it was entirely made out of plastic, lenses and all. It did look just like a Nikon until you took it out of the box and felt how light it was (box had stuff to make it heavier in it) and then unwrapped the plastic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've seen similar things before but with other products , I once saw a Nikon Camera that upon opening the box you got a working camera , except it was entirely made out of plastic , lenses and all .
It did look just like a Nikon until you took it out of the box and felt how light it was ( box had stuff to make it heavier in it ) and then unwrapped the plastic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've seen similar things before but with other products, I once saw a Nikon Camera that upon opening the box you got a working camera, except it was entirely made out of plastic, lenses and all.
It did look just like a Nikon until you took it out of the box and felt how light it was (box had stuff to make it heavier in it) and then unwrapped the plastic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31423000</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>Aardpig</author>
	<datestamp>1268155740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Newegg was founded in 2001, yet this all took place in 1997? I call shenanigans, both on this story and the notion that you have a girlfriend.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Newegg was founded in 2001 , yet this all took place in 1997 ?
I call shenanigans , both on this story and the notion that you have a girlfriend .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Newegg was founded in 2001, yet this all took place in 1997?
I call shenanigans, both on this story and the notion that you have a girlfriend.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31388742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384610</id>
	<title>I've had very good luck with Newegg</title>
	<author>mschuyler</author>
	<datestamp>1267879320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They've been extremely fast and very responsive. And no, they don't build it for you. That's the point of buying from them so you can have the pleasure of building it yourself. My guess is Newegg got taken on these goods and didn't even know it. I guess we'll see...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 've been extremely fast and very responsive .
And no , they do n't build it for you .
That 's the point of buying from them so you can have the pleasure of building it yourself .
My guess is Newegg got taken on these goods and did n't even know it .
I guess we 'll see.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They've been extremely fast and very responsive.
And no, they don't build it for you.
That's the point of buying from them so you can have the pleasure of building it yourself.
My guess is Newegg got taken on these goods and didn't even know it.
I guess we'll see...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385066</id>
	<title>Re:hey, Newegg</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267883400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please metamod the troll mods on parent.</p><p>Why was parent modded troll? My post could have practically been a paraphrase Newegg customer service response tweeta. Which, btw, were as follows:</p><p>"Newegg is aware of a shipping error that occurred with certain recent orders of the Intel Core i7-920 CPU. After investigating the issue internally it appears one of our long term partners mistakenly shipped a small number of demo boxes instead of functional units. Our customer service team has already begun proactively reaching out to the affected customers. In line with our commitment to ensure total customer satisfaction... We are doing everything in our power to resolve the issue as soon as possible and with the least amount of inconvenience to our customers. We are aware of the issue, have investigated it and will resolve it to the full satisfaction of all customers."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please metamod the troll mods on parent.Why was parent modded troll ?
My post could have practically been a paraphrase Newegg customer service response tweeta .
Which , btw , were as follows : " Newegg is aware of a shipping error that occurred with certain recent orders of the Intel Core i7-920 CPU .
After investigating the issue internally it appears one of our long term partners mistakenly shipped a small number of demo boxes instead of functional units .
Our customer service team has already begun proactively reaching out to the affected customers .
In line with our commitment to ensure total customer satisfaction... We are doing everything in our power to resolve the issue as soon as possible and with the least amount of inconvenience to our customers .
We are aware of the issue , have investigated it and will resolve it to the full satisfaction of all customers .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please metamod the troll mods on parent.Why was parent modded troll?
My post could have practically been a paraphrase Newegg customer service response tweeta.
Which, btw, were as follows:"Newegg is aware of a shipping error that occurred with certain recent orders of the Intel Core i7-920 CPU.
After investigating the issue internally it appears one of our long term partners mistakenly shipped a small number of demo boxes instead of functional units.
Our customer service team has already begun proactively reaching out to the affected customers.
In line with our commitment to ensure total customer satisfaction... We are doing everything in our power to resolve the issue as soon as possible and with the least amount of inconvenience to our customers.
We are aware of the issue, have investigated it and will resolve it to the full satisfaction of all customers.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384952</id>
	<title>Re:My swap meet story</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267882320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's when you call the police. You know, crime in progress? I'm sure police would like to be able to confiscate 3m worth of processors, without doing much work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's when you call the police .
You know , crime in progress ?
I 'm sure police would like to be able to confiscate 3m worth of processors , without doing much work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's when you call the police.
You know, crime in progress?
I'm sure police would like to be able to confiscate 3m worth of processors, without doing much work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31388742</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>Phat\_Tony</author>
	<datestamp>1267971120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>they have a great reputation</p></div><p>

Do you ever deal with their customer service? My girlfriend bought a new computer from them and they lied about the specs. OK, maybe they "were mistaken." But we had the list of specs - it listed an Nvidia graphics card that wasn't in the case at all, it only had integrated Intel graphics. It didn't even have a card slot for a discreet graphics card. They'd listed the video RAM separately in the specs, with no mention of "shared" memory or anything, but it turned out it only had shared memory, so effectively much less RAM than they'd sold it with. Plus, this was back in 1997, it had a DVD-drive built in, but it could NOT play DVD's. It didn't have any video playback hardware that supported it, and the machine was not fast enough to handle software decoding, so out of the box, any DVD video would be unwatchably choppy, with the sound cutting in and out and only one frame per second or so.<br> <br>

So we called and complained, and they said we could return it, and get our money back... minus a 15\% restocking fee. We said no, that they hadn't shipped us what we'd paid for, that we had the specs they'd advertised, still up on the web page, in the confirmation email they'd sent us, on the shipping receipt... they all matched each other and all did not match the computer. We argued till we were blue in the face, asked to talk to a manager, who gave us the same response, called and talked to someone else, same response, and tried emailing them, same response. A friend, who was a computer science major, didn't believe us that Newegg could be that bad, so HE tried calling, and he got the same response. They did NOT attempt to argue that they had shipped us a computer that matched the specs, or that we were somehow mistaken. They just said that, despite their significantly inaccurate description, if we returned it, we had to pay the restocking fee. And we hadn't waited to complain or anything, we were on the phone with them within 24 hours of delivery. This was about an $800 computer, so they wanted us to pay return shipping plus they kept a $120 "restocking" fee.<br> <br>

I encouraged my girlfriend to contest the charge with her credit card company, but she just paid it because she was so sick of the situation and mad about it, she just wanted it to be over.

<br> <br>
As far as I'm concerned, Newegg are just a bunch of con-artists.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>they have a great reputation Do you ever deal with their customer service ?
My girlfriend bought a new computer from them and they lied about the specs .
OK , maybe they " were mistaken .
" But we had the list of specs - it listed an Nvidia graphics card that was n't in the case at all , it only had integrated Intel graphics .
It did n't even have a card slot for a discreet graphics card .
They 'd listed the video RAM separately in the specs , with no mention of " shared " memory or anything , but it turned out it only had shared memory , so effectively much less RAM than they 'd sold it with .
Plus , this was back in 1997 , it had a DVD-drive built in , but it could NOT play DVD 's .
It did n't have any video playback hardware that supported it , and the machine was not fast enough to handle software decoding , so out of the box , any DVD video would be unwatchably choppy , with the sound cutting in and out and only one frame per second or so .
So we called and complained , and they said we could return it , and get our money back... minus a 15 \ % restocking fee .
We said no , that they had n't shipped us what we 'd paid for , that we had the specs they 'd advertised , still up on the web page , in the confirmation email they 'd sent us , on the shipping receipt... they all matched each other and all did not match the computer .
We argued till we were blue in the face , asked to talk to a manager , who gave us the same response , called and talked to someone else , same response , and tried emailing them , same response .
A friend , who was a computer science major , did n't believe us that Newegg could be that bad , so HE tried calling , and he got the same response .
They did NOT attempt to argue that they had shipped us a computer that matched the specs , or that we were somehow mistaken .
They just said that , despite their significantly inaccurate description , if we returned it , we had to pay the restocking fee .
And we had n't waited to complain or anything , we were on the phone with them within 24 hours of delivery .
This was about an $ 800 computer , so they wanted us to pay return shipping plus they kept a $ 120 " restocking " fee .
I encouraged my girlfriend to contest the charge with her credit card company , but she just paid it because she was so sick of the situation and mad about it , she just wanted it to be over .
As far as I 'm concerned , Newegg are just a bunch of con-artists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they have a great reputation

Do you ever deal with their customer service?
My girlfriend bought a new computer from them and they lied about the specs.
OK, maybe they "were mistaken.
" But we had the list of specs - it listed an Nvidia graphics card that wasn't in the case at all, it only had integrated Intel graphics.
It didn't even have a card slot for a discreet graphics card.
They'd listed the video RAM separately in the specs, with no mention of "shared" memory or anything, but it turned out it only had shared memory, so effectively much less RAM than they'd sold it with.
Plus, this was back in 1997, it had a DVD-drive built in, but it could NOT play DVD's.
It didn't have any video playback hardware that supported it, and the machine was not fast enough to handle software decoding, so out of the box, any DVD video would be unwatchably choppy, with the sound cutting in and out and only one frame per second or so.
So we called and complained, and they said we could return it, and get our money back... minus a 15\% restocking fee.
We said no, that they hadn't shipped us what we'd paid for, that we had the specs they'd advertised, still up on the web page, in the confirmation email they'd sent us, on the shipping receipt... they all matched each other and all did not match the computer.
We argued till we were blue in the face, asked to talk to a manager, who gave us the same response, called and talked to someone else, same response, and tried emailing them, same response.
A friend, who was a computer science major, didn't believe us that Newegg could be that bad, so HE tried calling, and he got the same response.
They did NOT attempt to argue that they had shipped us a computer that matched the specs, or that we were somehow mistaken.
They just said that, despite their significantly inaccurate description, if we returned it, we had to pay the restocking fee.
And we hadn't waited to complain or anything, we were on the phone with them within 24 hours of delivery.
This was about an $800 computer, so they wanted us to pay return shipping plus they kept a $120 "restocking" fee.
I encouraged my girlfriend to contest the charge with her credit card company, but she just paid it because she was so sick of the situation and mad about it, she just wanted it to be over.
As far as I'm concerned, Newegg are just a bunch of con-artists.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31409534</id>
	<title>Message from Newegg</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268065500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Newegg is currently conducting a thorough investigation surrounding recent  shipments of questionable Intel Core i7-920 CPUs purchased from Newegg.com.</p><p>Initial information we received from our supplier, IPEX, stated that they had mistakenly shipped us "demo units."  We have since come to discover the CPUs were counterfeit and are terminating our relationship with this supplier. Contrary to any speculation, D&amp;H Distributing is not the vendor that supplied us with the Intel Core i7-920 CPUs in question.</p><p>Newegg&rsquo;s top priority is to proactively reach out to all customers who may have been affected to ensure their absolute satisfaction. We have already sent out a number of replacement units and are doing everything in our power to resolve the matter promptly and with the least amount of inconvenience to our customers.</p><p>We have always taken pride in providing an exceptional experience for each customer, and we apologize for any inconvenience to our valued customers.  We take matters like this extremely seriously, and are working in close cooperation with Intel and the appropriate law enforcement authorities to thoroughly investigate this incident."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Newegg is currently conducting a thorough investigation surrounding recent shipments of questionable Intel Core i7-920 CPUs purchased from Newegg.com.Initial information we received from our supplier , IPEX , stated that they had mistakenly shipped us " demo units .
" We have since come to discover the CPUs were counterfeit and are terminating our relationship with this supplier .
Contrary to any speculation , D&amp;H Distributing is not the vendor that supplied us with the Intel Core i7-920 CPUs in question.Newegg    s top priority is to proactively reach out to all customers who may have been affected to ensure their absolute satisfaction .
We have already sent out a number of replacement units and are doing everything in our power to resolve the matter promptly and with the least amount of inconvenience to our customers.We have always taken pride in providing an exceptional experience for each customer , and we apologize for any inconvenience to our valued customers .
We take matters like this extremely seriously , and are working in close cooperation with Intel and the appropriate law enforcement authorities to thoroughly investigate this incident .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Newegg is currently conducting a thorough investigation surrounding recent  shipments of questionable Intel Core i7-920 CPUs purchased from Newegg.com.Initial information we received from our supplier, IPEX, stated that they had mistakenly shipped us "demo units.
"  We have since come to discover the CPUs were counterfeit and are terminating our relationship with this supplier.
Contrary to any speculation, D&amp;H Distributing is not the vendor that supplied us with the Intel Core i7-920 CPUs in question.Newegg’s top priority is to proactively reach out to all customers who may have been affected to ensure their absolute satisfaction.
We have already sent out a number of replacement units and are doing everything in our power to resolve the matter promptly and with the least amount of inconvenience to our customers.We have always taken pride in providing an exceptional experience for each customer, and we apologize for any inconvenience to our valued customers.
We take matters like this extremely seriously, and are working in close cooperation with Intel and the appropriate law enforcement authorities to thoroughly investigate this incident.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385502</id>
	<title>Re:asian counterfeits?</title>
	<author>twostix</author>
	<datestamp>1267886280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Organised Crime?

I suppose that's a good a label as any for the Chinese Government and its "grey market" factories who have total support of said government in their counterfeit output.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Organised Crime ?
I suppose that 's a good a label as any for the Chinese Government and its " grey market " factories who have total support of said government in their counterfeit output .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Organised Crime?
I suppose that's a good a label as any for the Chinese Government and its "grey market" factories who have total support of said government in their counterfeit output.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350</id>
	<title>Video Games</title>
	<author>Alaren</author>
	<datestamp>1267877100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds a little excessive for "fraud by another Newegg customer."  Another customer would at least have had real stickers (from the original box).

</p><p>In fact it reminds me of a childhood experience.  Back when Final Fantasy "II" came out for the SNES, I bought it at Toys R Us.  It was shrink-wrapped and everything.  When I opened it, instead of a cartridge it had a bolt with a couple nuts screwed on so it would weigh the same as a cartridge.  Fortunately, the manager was willing to swap it out for me--but from then on, I always opened my cartridges at the register after paying.  Considering the shrinkwrap and the contents of the box, to this day I suspect a factory worker took home a little souveneir... but who knows?

</p><p>Hopefully Newegg follows through, I'd be interested to know what happened here.  At the very least I imagine they will be inspecting their shipments a little more closely for a while.  I buy from them all the time, they have a great reputation, and I doubt they are doing to ignore these claims (whether we hear about it or not).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds a little excessive for " fraud by another Newegg customer .
" Another customer would at least have had real stickers ( from the original box ) .
In fact it reminds me of a childhood experience .
Back when Final Fantasy " II " came out for the SNES , I bought it at Toys R Us .
It was shrink-wrapped and everything .
When I opened it , instead of a cartridge it had a bolt with a couple nuts screwed on so it would weigh the same as a cartridge .
Fortunately , the manager was willing to swap it out for me--but from then on , I always opened my cartridges at the register after paying .
Considering the shrinkwrap and the contents of the box , to this day I suspect a factory worker took home a little souveneir... but who knows ?
Hopefully Newegg follows through , I 'd be interested to know what happened here .
At the very least I imagine they will be inspecting their shipments a little more closely for a while .
I buy from them all the time , they have a great reputation , and I doubt they are doing to ignore these claims ( whether we hear about it or not ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds a little excessive for "fraud by another Newegg customer.
"  Another customer would at least have had real stickers (from the original box).
In fact it reminds me of a childhood experience.
Back when Final Fantasy "II" came out for the SNES, I bought it at Toys R Us.
It was shrink-wrapped and everything.
When I opened it, instead of a cartridge it had a bolt with a couple nuts screwed on so it would weigh the same as a cartridge.
Fortunately, the manager was willing to swap it out for me--but from then on, I always opened my cartridges at the register after paying.
Considering the shrinkwrap and the contents of the box, to this day I suspect a factory worker took home a little souveneir... but who knows?
Hopefully Newegg follows through, I'd be interested to know what happened here.
At the very least I imagine they will be inspecting their shipments a little more closely for a while.
I buy from them all the time, they have a great reputation, and I doubt they are doing to ignore these claims (whether we hear about it or not).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385526</id>
	<title>it happens</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267886460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It happens, I got a brick in a new stereo box from Best Buy, they were actually pretty good about it (to my surprise!).  I've never had problems with new egg and I'm sure they'll make it right after some due diligence on their part.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It happens , I got a brick in a new stereo box from Best Buy , they were actually pretty good about it ( to my surprise ! ) .
I 've never had problems with new egg and I 'm sure they 'll make it right after some due diligence on their part .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It happens, I got a brick in a new stereo box from Best Buy, they were actually pretty good about it (to my surprise!).
I've never had problems with new egg and I'm sure they'll make it right after some due diligence on their part.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384644</id>
	<title>Re:I won't buy from newegg any more.....</title>
	<author>Garble Snarky</author>
	<datestamp>1267879560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have no particular allegiance to Newegg. Just to rational thought.
<br>
"open box" generally implies that returns are not allowed or seriously restricted. Your evidence that you got "stuff they know is bad" is based on your unqualified beliefs
<br>
1. that "Most companies put them together and fire them up once to make sure they work" (the fact that it came unassembled might be a clue that they did not test it, as per their clear disclaimer: "Please bear in mind that due to the varying quality of testing, you are taking a risk when purchasing open box products. ") and
<br>
2. that if an electronic device is working at one point in time, it will work for all of eternity. The products may have worked or appeared to work under testing conditions, which may have been different than your conditions.
<br> <br>
You got broken shit. You should have known that was a possibility when buying an open-box item. The lesson you should have learned was to stop buying open-box items, not to stop buying from Newegg.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have no particular allegiance to Newegg .
Just to rational thought .
" open box " generally implies that returns are not allowed or seriously restricted .
Your evidence that you got " stuff they know is bad " is based on your unqualified beliefs 1. that " Most companies put them together and fire them up once to make sure they work " ( the fact that it came unassembled might be a clue that they did not test it , as per their clear disclaimer : " Please bear in mind that due to the varying quality of testing , you are taking a risk when purchasing open box products .
" ) and 2. that if an electronic device is working at one point in time , it will work for all of eternity .
The products may have worked or appeared to work under testing conditions , which may have been different than your conditions .
You got broken shit .
You should have known that was a possibility when buying an open-box item .
The lesson you should have learned was to stop buying open-box items , not to stop buying from Newegg .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have no particular allegiance to Newegg.
Just to rational thought.
"open box" generally implies that returns are not allowed or seriously restricted.
Your evidence that you got "stuff they know is bad" is based on your unqualified beliefs

1. that "Most companies put them together and fire them up once to make sure they work" (the fact that it came unassembled might be a clue that they did not test it, as per their clear disclaimer: "Please bear in mind that due to the varying quality of testing, you are taking a risk when purchasing open box products.
") and

2. that if an electronic device is working at one point in time, it will work for all of eternity.
The products may have worked or appeared to work under testing conditions, which may have been different than your conditions.
You got broken shit.
You should have known that was a possibility when buying an open-box item.
The lesson you should have learned was to stop buying open-box items, not to stop buying from Newegg.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384826</id>
	<title>Re:Newegg has responded</title>
	<author>interval1066</author>
	<datestamp>1267881180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The first link says "After investigating the issue internally it appears one of our long term partners mistakenly shipped a small number of demo boxes..."<br>My ass. Demo units with misspellings? Give me a break.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The first link says " After investigating the issue internally it appears one of our long term partners mistakenly shipped a small number of demo boxes... " My ass .
Demo units with misspellings ?
Give me a break .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first link says "After investigating the issue internally it appears one of our long term partners mistakenly shipped a small number of demo boxes..."My ass.
Demo units with misspellings?
Give me a break.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385112</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>Jarik C-Bol</author>
	<datestamp>1267883760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>gamestop does this itself. they open the boxes, take the disc, and keep it behind the counter. that way people don't open the boxes and steal the disc. when you buy it, they go into the drawer, find a disc, let you inspect it (for scratches and whatnot) then put it in the box for you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>gamestop does this itself .
they open the boxes , take the disc , and keep it behind the counter .
that way people do n't open the boxes and steal the disc .
when you buy it , they go into the drawer , find a disc , let you inspect it ( for scratches and whatnot ) then put it in the box for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>gamestop does this itself.
they open the boxes, take the disc, and keep it behind the counter.
that way people don't open the boxes and steal the disc.
when you buy it, they go into the drawer, find a disc, let you inspect it (for scratches and whatnot) then put it in the box for you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384834</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385750</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>Sir\_Sri</author>
	<datestamp>1267888980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that's only for their 'gutted' products.  Which isn't everything.  They usually have one gutted that makes up the store display, and then several unopened in the back or otherwise locked up.  If you buy the last in stock of an item they give you the store display and the gutted disk.</p><p>Used are usually all gutted.</p><p>This thing with newegg almost looks like they are promo boxes or mock ups that got accidentally shipped out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that 's only for their 'gutted ' products .
Which is n't everything .
They usually have one gutted that makes up the store display , and then several unopened in the back or otherwise locked up .
If you buy the last in stock of an item they give you the store display and the gutted disk.Used are usually all gutted.This thing with newegg almost looks like they are promo boxes or mock ups that got accidentally shipped out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that's only for their 'gutted' products.
Which isn't everything.
They usually have one gutted that makes up the store display, and then several unopened in the back or otherwise locked up.
If you buy the last in stock of an item they give you the store display and the gutted disk.Used are usually all gutted.This thing with newegg almost looks like they are promo boxes or mock ups that got accidentally shipped out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31391026</id>
	<title>You know...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267984260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>several years ago I bought a 4800+ from newegg which was DOA.  In the RMA process they claimed that they would "examine and test" the returned CPU to verify that it was really and truly DOA as well as looking, apparently, for mechanical damage caused by me.  (It looked perfect, just didn't power up with two different PSUs with which a 3200+ worked.  Unfortunately only had the single mb to test with.  The only problem I had with them was that they claimed that they would return ship by FedEx overnight which they failed to do leaving me with a week before receiving the replacement.  I shipped my DOA back by USPS plain old standard package shipping and it was at their warehouse by noon the next day FFS! (I love the USPS, best price and the max time from west coast has been 3d which you get to pay ALOT extra for from the private carriers, plus USPS moves stuff ALL of the time not just weekdays PLUS Saturday delivery for free.  Yeah I know I heard all about damaged packages etc. but I've also heard that of UPS and FedEx and comparatively speaking all of my USPS shipments generally arrive in better shipping packaging shape than the private carriers ever manage, not to mention USPS has failed to "lose" any of my packages yet...)</p><p>So... I find the customer fraud bit a bit difficult to swallow.  More likely someone inhouse thief and/or maybe newegg is having some financial problems? (Which would suck as they tend to have the best overall pricing if not always the absolute lowest price on varying components.)</p><p>Does newegg still just ship out of NJ(? IIRC or was it NY?) and California?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>several years ago I bought a 4800 + from newegg which was DOA .
In the RMA process they claimed that they would " examine and test " the returned CPU to verify that it was really and truly DOA as well as looking , apparently , for mechanical damage caused by me .
( It looked perfect , just did n't power up with two different PSUs with which a 3200 + worked .
Unfortunately only had the single mb to test with .
The only problem I had with them was that they claimed that they would return ship by FedEx overnight which they failed to do leaving me with a week before receiving the replacement .
I shipped my DOA back by USPS plain old standard package shipping and it was at their warehouse by noon the next day FFS !
( I love the USPS , best price and the max time from west coast has been 3d which you get to pay ALOT extra for from the private carriers , plus USPS moves stuff ALL of the time not just weekdays PLUS Saturday delivery for free .
Yeah I know I heard all about damaged packages etc .
but I 've also heard that of UPS and FedEx and comparatively speaking all of my USPS shipments generally arrive in better shipping packaging shape than the private carriers ever manage , not to mention USPS has failed to " lose " any of my packages yet... ) So... I find the customer fraud bit a bit difficult to swallow .
More likely someone inhouse thief and/or maybe newegg is having some financial problems ?
( Which would suck as they tend to have the best overall pricing if not always the absolute lowest price on varying components .
) Does newegg still just ship out of NJ ( ?
IIRC or was it NY ?
) and California ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>several years ago I bought a 4800+ from newegg which was DOA.
In the RMA process they claimed that they would "examine and test" the returned CPU to verify that it was really and truly DOA as well as looking, apparently, for mechanical damage caused by me.
(It looked perfect, just didn't power up with two different PSUs with which a 3200+ worked.
Unfortunately only had the single mb to test with.
The only problem I had with them was that they claimed that they would return ship by FedEx overnight which they failed to do leaving me with a week before receiving the replacement.
I shipped my DOA back by USPS plain old standard package shipping and it was at their warehouse by noon the next day FFS!
(I love the USPS, best price and the max time from west coast has been 3d which you get to pay ALOT extra for from the private carriers, plus USPS moves stuff ALL of the time not just weekdays PLUS Saturday delivery for free.
Yeah I know I heard all about damaged packages etc.
but I've also heard that of UPS and FedEx and comparatively speaking all of my USPS shipments generally arrive in better shipping packaging shape than the private carriers ever manage, not to mention USPS has failed to "lose" any of my packages yet...)So... I find the customer fraud bit a bit difficult to swallow.
More likely someone inhouse thief and/or maybe newegg is having some financial problems?
(Which would suck as they tend to have the best overall pricing if not always the absolute lowest price on varying components.
)Does newegg still just ship out of NJ(?
IIRC or was it NY?
) and California?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384588</id>
	<title>From Intels Elbonian manufacturing plant</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267879080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> This is what Intel gets from assembling these boxes in Elbonia. The CPUs are $300, and the pay to the Elbonian packer is $0.17. You were hired from the mud farm, and told to put these little green squares with metal into a box with a plastic propeller in it. Now you discover that these squares you are handling is worth 1 full years salary, and your family is starving.</p><p>Maybe your even think the little squares you make will work just as fine as the original ones, and that the end user will not notice. Your cousin tiled his entire bathroom with all the extra P4, and to him, they where all the same. And for the fan, a little plastic toy is pretty much the same whether the car wheels spin around or not, as long as it looks fine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is what Intel gets from assembling these boxes in Elbonia .
The CPUs are $ 300 , and the pay to the Elbonian packer is $ 0.17 .
You were hired from the mud farm , and told to put these little green squares with metal into a box with a plastic propeller in it .
Now you discover that these squares you are handling is worth 1 full years salary , and your family is starving.Maybe your even think the little squares you make will work just as fine as the original ones , and that the end user will not notice .
Your cousin tiled his entire bathroom with all the extra P4 , and to him , they where all the same .
And for the fan , a little plastic toy is pretty much the same whether the car wheels spin around or not , as long as it looks fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> This is what Intel gets from assembling these boxes in Elbonia.
The CPUs are $300, and the pay to the Elbonian packer is $0.17.
You were hired from the mud farm, and told to put these little green squares with metal into a box with a plastic propeller in it.
Now you discover that these squares you are handling is worth 1 full years salary, and your family is starving.Maybe your even think the little squares you make will work just as fine as the original ones, and that the end user will not notice.
Your cousin tiled his entire bathroom with all the extra P4, and to him, they where all the same.
And for the fan, a little plastic toy is pretty much the same whether the car wheels spin around or not, as long as it looks fine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385408</id>
	<title>Saw that one coming....</title>
	<author>prikkebeen</author>
	<datestamp>1267885620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's ACTA time....

It's been bought and payed for i think. Somewhere someone must be smiling by now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's ACTA time... . It 's been bought and payed for i think .
Somewhere someone must be smiling by now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's ACTA time....

It's been bought and payed for i think.
Somewhere someone must be smiling by now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386140</id>
	<title>Re:Been caught out with faked good from Amazon too</title>
	<author>Ryanrule</author>
	<datestamp>1267892640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>People PAY for flash drives? I have an 8gig model on my keychain from ocz that was free.</htmltext>
<tokenext>People PAY for flash drives ?
I have an 8gig model on my keychain from ocz that was free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People PAY for flash drives?
I have an 8gig model on my keychain from ocz that was free.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384832</id>
	<title>Re:There must be more out there</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1267881240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; There must be hundreds out there.</p><p>More like tens of thousands, I would think.  Most are probably being sold in Asia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; There must be hundreds out there.More like tens of thousands , I would think .
Most are probably being sold in Asia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; There must be hundreds out there.More like tens of thousands, I would think.
Most are probably being sold in Asia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384312</id>
	<title>First post</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267876800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>is first.</htmltext>
<tokenext>is first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is first.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31389846</id>
	<title>Re:It's not the first time for NewEgg</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267977240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, you went to do a job, didn't complete it, sat on your ass for an extended period of time, and then blamed someone else for something you should have realized yourself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , you went to do a job , did n't complete it , sat on your ass for an extended period of time , and then blamed someone else for something you should have realized yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, you went to do a job, didn't complete it, sat on your ass for an extended period of time, and then blamed someone else for something you should have realized yourself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385048</id>
	<title>Re:From Intels Elbonian manufacturing plant</title>
	<author>Inschato</author>
	<datestamp>1267883160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To the person who modded the parent interesting: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elbonia" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elbonia</a> [wikipedia.org] <br>
<br>
i7's are made in the USA. (They used to be made in Costa Rica) source: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel\_Core\_i7" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel\_Core\_i7</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>To the person who modded the parent interesting : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elbonia [ wikipedia.org ] i7 's are made in the USA .
( They used to be made in Costa Rica ) source : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel \ _Core \ _i7 [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To the person who modded the parent interesting: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elbonia [wikipedia.org] 

i7's are made in the USA.
(They used to be made in Costa Rica) source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel\_Core\_i7 [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385034</id>
	<title>Relax, NewEgg is a fine store</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1267883040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been very happy with my purchases there--a Panaphonics TV and Sorny monitor. Shop there with confidence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been very happy with my purchases there--a Panaphonics TV and Sorny monitor .
Shop there with confidence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been very happy with my purchases there--a Panaphonics TV and Sorny monitor.
Shop there with confidence.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384594</id>
	<title>newegg</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267879140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>newegg commented on it on their twitter page</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>newegg commented on it on their twitter page</tokentext>
<sentencetext>newegg commented on it on their twitter page</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384698</id>
	<title>Reputation</title>
	<author>sconeu</author>
	<datestamp>1267880100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look at all the comments here.  Reputation is a major thing.</p><p>If a company has a reputation for doing right by its customers, as long as addresses a situation like this, it will be OK.</p><p>Now compare this to the reputation that Fry's or Tiger Direct had (don't know if either has improved).  Would they get the benefit of the doubt this way?</p><p>Just goes to show that doing good is just good business.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look at all the comments here .
Reputation is a major thing.If a company has a reputation for doing right by its customers , as long as addresses a situation like this , it will be OK.Now compare this to the reputation that Fry 's or Tiger Direct had ( do n't know if either has improved ) .
Would they get the benefit of the doubt this way ? Just goes to show that doing good is just good business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look at all the comments here.
Reputation is a major thing.If a company has a reputation for doing right by its customers, as long as addresses a situation like this, it will be OK.Now compare this to the reputation that Fry's or Tiger Direct had (don't know if either has improved).
Would they get the benefit of the doubt this way?Just goes to show that doing good is just good business.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31396020</id>
	<title>Hitler's reaction to receiving a fake i7 from...</title>
	<author>metaforest</author>
	<datestamp>1267972260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Newegg..</p><p>Fraekin Hilarious..</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQrAOQ4TzQc" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQrAOQ4TzQc</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Newegg..Fraekin Hilarious..http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = TQrAOQ4TzQc [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Newegg..Fraekin Hilarious..http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQrAOQ4TzQc [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384706</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267880100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think I will keep mine, blue screening less in windows.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think I will keep mine , blue screening less in windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think I will keep mine, blue screening less in windows.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385916</id>
	<title>Re:Reputation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267890600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;Now compare this to the reputation that Fry's or Tiger Direct had (don't know if either has improved). Would they get the benefit of the doubt this way?</p><p>Frys returns a lot of stuff to its stock without testing it. But they're always good about taking stuff back that doesn't work, so I prefer to do business with them over Best Buy, who will refuse to return purchases given half an excuse: "You've returned too many" - oh, I guess I won't be buying tech stuff for my company from you any more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; Now compare this to the reputation that Fry 's or Tiger Direct had ( do n't know if either has improved ) .
Would they get the benefit of the doubt this way ? Frys returns a lot of stuff to its stock without testing it .
But they 're always good about taking stuff back that does n't work , so I prefer to do business with them over Best Buy , who will refuse to return purchases given half an excuse : " You 've returned too many " - oh , I guess I wo n't be buying tech stuff for my company from you any more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;Now compare this to the reputation that Fry's or Tiger Direct had (don't know if either has improved).
Would they get the benefit of the doubt this way?Frys returns a lot of stuff to its stock without testing it.
But they're always good about taking stuff back that doesn't work, so I prefer to do business with them over Best Buy, who will refuse to return purchases given half an excuse: "You've returned too many" - oh, I guess I won't be buying tech stuff for my company from you any more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385058</id>
	<title>Re:Of course it's newegg's fault</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267883280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's forgiveable if they make it right and apologize, but they're the seller.  If their supplier or shipper betrayed them they screwed up by selecting that supplier and not watching them closely enough.</p></div><p>No.  It is Newegg's <b>responsibility</b>.</p><p>That's why they are replacing the fake units with new units, and investigating the situation to determine the cause.</p><p>That is not the same as it being Newegg's fault.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's forgiveable if they make it right and apologize , but they 're the seller .
If their supplier or shipper betrayed them they screwed up by selecting that supplier and not watching them closely enough.No .
It is Newegg 's responsibility.That 's why they are replacing the fake units with new units , and investigating the situation to determine the cause.That is not the same as it being Newegg 's fault .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's forgiveable if they make it right and apologize, but they're the seller.
If their supplier or shipper betrayed them they screwed up by selecting that supplier and not watching them closely enough.No.
It is Newegg's responsibility.That's why they are replacing the fake units with new units, and investigating the situation to determine the cause.That is not the same as it being Newegg's fault.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384502</id>
	<title>Been caught out with faked good from Amazon too.</title>
	<author>SimonTheSoundMan</author>
	<datestamp>1267878360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I once bought a Lexar 4GB USB flash drive from a major online store. When it arrived and I plugged it in, it was a 16MB flash drive within a Lexar case.</p><p>Fake USB flash drives seem not to be uncommon. I have heard it happen to some of my friends too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I once bought a Lexar 4GB USB flash drive from a major online store .
When it arrived and I plugged it in , it was a 16MB flash drive within a Lexar case.Fake USB flash drives seem not to be uncommon .
I have heard it happen to some of my friends too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I once bought a Lexar 4GB USB flash drive from a major online store.
When it arrived and I plugged it in, it was a 16MB flash drive within a Lexar case.Fake USB flash drives seem not to be uncommon.
I have heard it happen to some of my friends too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384410</id>
	<title>Newegg has responded</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267877580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Newegg/status/10050889498 http://twitter.com/Newegg/status/10050906222 And others.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... on Twitter : http : //twitter.com/Newegg/status/10050889498 http : //twitter.com/Newegg/status/10050906222 And others .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Newegg/status/10050889498 http://twitter.com/Newegg/status/10050906222 And others.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387004</id>
	<title>Re:Been a newegg.com customer for a long time</title>
	<author>notsoclever</author>
	<datestamp>1267903020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And not only will there be no "egg" on their faces but you might expect they would send out "new" stock to deal with this issue.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And not only will there be no " egg " on their faces but you might expect they would send out " new " stock to deal with this issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And not only will there be no "egg" on their faces but you might expect they would send out "new" stock to deal with this issue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31422028</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>Zaphod The 42nd</author>
	<datestamp>1268145780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There was a bolt in your soft taco? Holy crap! According to an episode of Kenan and Kel (I hope some of you remember that show) you could totally sue them for a life supply of tuna. I mean lots of money.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There was a bolt in your soft taco ?
Holy crap !
According to an episode of Kenan and Kel ( I hope some of you remember that show ) you could totally sue them for a life supply of tuna .
I mean lots of money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was a bolt in your soft taco?
Holy crap!
According to an episode of Kenan and Kel (I hope some of you remember that show) you could totally sue them for a life supply of tuna.
I mean lots of money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386352</id>
	<title>Once at Walmart...</title>
	<author>Fished</author>
	<datestamp>1267895040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Once at Walmart I bought a stick an SD card... got it home, and instead of a 1GB stick, it was like 32MB.  The package had been opened and resealed, and someone had clearly gypped walmart by returning the 1GB package with the 32MB card in it.  Let me tell you, it was really interesting trying to explain to the manager what the problem was, but they did eventually exchange it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Once at Walmart I bought a stick an SD card... got it home , and instead of a 1GB stick , it was like 32MB .
The package had been opened and resealed , and someone had clearly gypped walmart by returning the 1GB package with the 32MB card in it .
Let me tell you , it was really interesting trying to explain to the manager what the problem was , but they did eventually exchange it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once at Walmart I bought a stick an SD card... got it home, and instead of a 1GB stick, it was like 32MB.
The package had been opened and resealed, and someone had clearly gypped walmart by returning the 1GB package with the 32MB card in it.
Let me tell you, it was really interesting trying to explain to the manager what the problem was, but they did eventually exchange it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385424</id>
	<title>Re:Dropship?</title>
	<author>iCEBaLM</author>
	<datestamp>1267885740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Probably via <a href="http://www.sarna.net/wiki/DropShip" title="sarna.net">Dropship</a> [sarna.net]. It's much more economical to outsource to mercs like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf's\_Dragoons" title="wikipedia.org">Wolf's Dragoons</a> [wikipedia.org] or the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercenaries\_(BattleTech)#Northwind\_Highlanders" title="wikipedia.org">Northwind Highlanders</a> [wikipedia.org] than to keep your own stock of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BattleMech" title="wikipedia.org">mechs</a> [wikipedia.org] around.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably via Dropship [ sarna.net ] .
It 's much more economical to outsource to mercs like Wolf 's Dragoons [ wikipedia.org ] or the Northwind Highlanders [ wikipedia.org ] than to keep your own stock of mechs [ wikipedia.org ] around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably via Dropship [sarna.net].
It's much more economical to outsource to mercs like Wolf's Dragoons [wikipedia.org] or the Northwind Highlanders [wikipedia.org] than to keep your own stock of mechs [wikipedia.org] around.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385640</id>
	<title>It's not the first time for NewEgg</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267887600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>We had a problem with some Intel dual port gig cards and NewEgg about five years ago.  We had ordered them shipped directly out to the data center (800 miles away) because of an urgent need, but upon installation, we were seeing various odd problems.  Suspecting a driver issue, we left them in and returned home.  Never resolved the problems.  Pulled them a few months later on the next visit.  Further research showed that they were phony Intel cards.  Apparently several resellers had been hit with these.  However, NewEgg maintained that it was no longer their problem because of their return policy (30 days, maybe, I don't remember), and refused to make an exception for goods that they knew were knock-offs.  This was really too bad, as we started buying less stuff from them after that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We had a problem with some Intel dual port gig cards and NewEgg about five years ago .
We had ordered them shipped directly out to the data center ( 800 miles away ) because of an urgent need , but upon installation , we were seeing various odd problems .
Suspecting a driver issue , we left them in and returned home .
Never resolved the problems .
Pulled them a few months later on the next visit .
Further research showed that they were phony Intel cards .
Apparently several resellers had been hit with these .
However , NewEgg maintained that it was no longer their problem because of their return policy ( 30 days , maybe , I do n't remember ) , and refused to make an exception for goods that they knew were knock-offs .
This was really too bad , as we started buying less stuff from them after that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We had a problem with some Intel dual port gig cards and NewEgg about five years ago.
We had ordered them shipped directly out to the data center (800 miles away) because of an urgent need, but upon installation, we were seeing various odd problems.
Suspecting a driver issue, we left them in and returned home.
Never resolved the problems.
Pulled them a few months later on the next visit.
Further research showed that they were phony Intel cards.
Apparently several resellers had been hit with these.
However, NewEgg maintained that it was no longer their problem because of their return policy (30 days, maybe, I don't remember), and refused to make an exception for goods that they knew were knock-offs.
This was really too bad, as we started buying less stuff from them after that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384512</id>
	<title>I won't buy from newegg any more.....</title>
	<author>budword</author>
	<datestamp>1267878420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I ordered a motherboard/cpu/ram combo from them. Open box idem. It came unassembled, which is fine, but unusual. Most companies put them together and fire them up once to make sure they work. Fine. Didn't work. Took me forever to figure out the problem. One ram slot was fried, the other one worked about half the time.  Went through a lot of ram figuring it out. One IDE channel was fried. The mother board was just a complete loss. The new cpu they sent was the only thing that ever worked right, though never in that motherboard.</p><p>I won't buy from them anymore, no matter how good the deal is. They offer stuff they know is bad under their "open box" policies, so you can't return them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ordered a motherboard/cpu/ram combo from them .
Open box idem .
It came unassembled , which is fine , but unusual .
Most companies put them together and fire them up once to make sure they work .
Fine. Did n't work .
Took me forever to figure out the problem .
One ram slot was fried , the other one worked about half the time .
Went through a lot of ram figuring it out .
One IDE channel was fried .
The mother board was just a complete loss .
The new cpu they sent was the only thing that ever worked right , though never in that motherboard.I wo n't buy from them anymore , no matter how good the deal is .
They offer stuff they know is bad under their " open box " policies , so you ca n't return them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I ordered a motherboard/cpu/ram combo from them.
Open box idem.
It came unassembled, which is fine, but unusual.
Most companies put them together and fire them up once to make sure they work.
Fine. Didn't work.
Took me forever to figure out the problem.
One ram slot was fried, the other one worked about half the time.
Went through a lot of ram figuring it out.
One IDE channel was fried.
The mother board was just a complete loss.
The new cpu they sent was the only thing that ever worked right, though never in that motherboard.I won't buy from them anymore, no matter how good the deal is.
They offer stuff they know is bad under their "open box" policies, so you can't return them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31396130</id>
	<title>Hitler's response to discovering</title>
	<author>metaforest</author>
	<datestamp>1267972860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>his Core i7 is fake....</p><p>hilarious video!</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQrAOQ4TzQc" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQrAOQ4TzQc</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>his Core i7 is fake....hilarious video ! http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = TQrAOQ4TzQc [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>his Core i7 is fake....hilarious video!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQrAOQ4TzQc [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385664</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267887960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is standard procedure for video games, dvds and music in the Netherlands. All the stuff on the shelves is just empty boxes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is standard procedure for video games , dvds and music in the Netherlands .
All the stuff on the shelves is just empty boxes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is standard procedure for video games, dvds and music in the Netherlands.
All the stuff on the shelves is just empty boxes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31426910</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>bluefoxlucid</author>
	<datestamp>1268239980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, the ENTIRE service department at NewEgg got your girlfriend to bend over?
</p><p>
Dude, that one's a keeper.  Put a ring on her.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , the ENTIRE service department at NewEgg got your girlfriend to bend over ?
Dude , that one 's a keeper .
Put a ring on her .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, the ENTIRE service department at NewEgg got your girlfriend to bend over?
Dude, that one's a keeper.
Put a ring on her.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31388742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386318</id>
	<title>Re:Dropship?</title>
	<author>FourDegreez</author>
	<datestamp>1267894680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They have three warehouses. Here you can see a tour.. it's pretty neat:</p><p><a href="http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=2694" title="anandtech.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=2694</a> [anandtech.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They have three warehouses .
Here you can see a tour.. it 's pretty neat : http : //www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx ? i = 2694 [ anandtech.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They have three warehouses.
Here you can see a tour.. it's pretty neat:http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=2694 [anandtech.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384884</id>
	<title>Re:Dropship?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267881660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most of my newegg orders from NE philly ship out of Edison, NJ. If it is UPS ship I often get it the next day with late afternoon orders. They also use DHL which hands off to USPS and always takes MUCH longer despite it only being used for little packages. One DHL package left EDISON NJ to be tendered to the USPS in Maryland! That routing makes no sense, but indicates several layer where nonsense could go on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of my newegg orders from NE philly ship out of Edison , NJ .
If it is UPS ship I often get it the next day with late afternoon orders .
They also use DHL which hands off to USPS and always takes MUCH longer despite it only being used for little packages .
One DHL package left EDISON NJ to be tendered to the USPS in Maryland !
That routing makes no sense , but indicates several layer where nonsense could go on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of my newegg orders from NE philly ship out of Edison, NJ.
If it is UPS ship I often get it the next day with late afternoon orders.
They also use DHL which hands off to USPS and always takes MUCH longer despite it only being used for little packages.
One DHL package left EDISON NJ to be tendered to the USPS in Maryland!
That routing makes no sense, but indicates several layer where nonsense could go on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385740</id>
	<title>I got a fake from newegg</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267888920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I got one of these fakes on Thursday from newegg...<br>They don't seem to be in a hurry to refund my money.<br>----</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I got one of these fakes on Thursday from newegg...They do n't seem to be in a hurry to refund my money.----</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got one of these fakes on Thursday from newegg...They don't seem to be in a hurry to refund my money.----</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384962</id>
	<title>That explains *everything*!</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1267882380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; I was at a swap meet a month ago and saw a *pallet* of Core I7 processors.</p><p>Now we know what became of the ones these guys were supposed to get.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I was at a swap meet a month ago and saw a * pallet * of Core I7 processors.Now we know what became of the ones these guys were supposed to get .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; I was at a swap meet a month ago and saw a *pallet* of Core I7 processors.Now we know what became of the ones these guys were supposed to get.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384630</id>
	<title>give some benefit of doubt</title>
	<author>onyxruby</author>
	<datestamp>1267879440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>chances are that newegg was similiarly duped, if they did this deliberately the cost to their business would be unrecoverable. went through something like this years ago with fake maxtor hard drives. turned out someone at the factory got a bunch of rejects, sent them to a shop and they had there firmware crudely rewritten along with professional labels. that is someone from the Western Digital factory.</p><p>Maxtor worked with me on it and they were able to tell by the circuit board who really made the hard drives. if memory serves they came from provantage and once I got provantage involved they replaced the entire lot of hard drives.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>chances are that newegg was similiarly duped , if they did this deliberately the cost to their business would be unrecoverable .
went through something like this years ago with fake maxtor hard drives .
turned out someone at the factory got a bunch of rejects , sent them to a shop and they had there firmware crudely rewritten along with professional labels .
that is someone from the Western Digital factory.Maxtor worked with me on it and they were able to tell by the circuit board who really made the hard drives .
if memory serves they came from provantage and once I got provantage involved they replaced the entire lot of hard drives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>chances are that newegg was similiarly duped, if they did this deliberately the cost to their business would be unrecoverable.
went through something like this years ago with fake maxtor hard drives.
turned out someone at the factory got a bunch of rejects, sent them to a shop and they had there firmware crudely rewritten along with professional labels.
that is someone from the Western Digital factory.Maxtor worked with me on it and they were able to tell by the circuit board who really made the hard drives.
if memory serves they came from provantage and once I got provantage involved they replaced the entire lot of hard drives.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384398</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1267877460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stores frequently have their own shrink wrap machine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stores frequently have their own shrink wrap machine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stores frequently have their own shrink wrap machine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386232</id>
	<title>A big misunderstanding</title>
	<author>FragHARD</author>
	<datestamp>1267893720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So this just apparently just a mixup!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>So this just apparently just a mixup ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So this just apparently just a mixup!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384654</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>Dumnezeu</author>
	<datestamp>1267879680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah, so you're the one who found it. Sorry about that...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , so you 're the one who found it .
Sorry about that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, so you're the one who found it.
Sorry about that...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385864</id>
	<title>Re:easy way to tell a fake</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267890120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or if <i>4195835.0/3145727.0 = 1.333 739 068 902 037 589</i>, then you know you have a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium\_FDIV\_bug" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">REAL Pentium</a> [wikipedia.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or if 4195835.0/3145727.0 = 1.333 739 068 902 037 589 , then you know you have a REAL Pentium [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or if 4195835.0/3145727.0 = 1.333 739 068 902 037 589, then you know you have a REAL Pentium [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385148</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267883940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is hilarious. I'm glad I never got ripped off like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is hilarious .
I 'm glad I never got ripped off like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is hilarious.
I'm glad I never got ripped off like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31397482</id>
	<title>Fake Intels make Hitler Unhappy</title>
	<author>Khyber</author>
	<datestamp>1267984860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some enterprising person godwinned the entire issue nicely for us.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQrAOQ4TzQc" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQrAOQ4TzQc</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some enterprising person godwinned the entire issue nicely for us.http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = TQrAOQ4TzQc [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some enterprising person godwinned the entire issue nicely for us.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQrAOQ4TzQc [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385546</id>
	<title>Re:Video Games</title>
	<author>Marillion</author>
	<datestamp>1267886640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm in favour of the factory theft theory.  All the pictures I saw of the label had "Sochet 1366" instead of "Socket 1366" and other various spelling mistakes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm in favour of the factory theft theory .
All the pictures I saw of the label had " Sochet 1366 " instead of " Socket 1366 " and other various spelling mistakes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm in favour of the factory theft theory.
All the pictures I saw of the label had "Sochet 1366" instead of "Socket 1366" and other various spelling mistakes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385622</id>
	<title>Re:no way newegg's fault</title>
	<author>GlL</author>
	<datestamp>1267887360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not only that, I remember seeing an article on neweggs setup in one of their warehouses. <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=2694&amp;p=1" title="anandtech.com">http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=2694&amp;p=1</a> [anandtech.com] Let's just say that between the surveillance and the other security measures I can almost guarantee this wasn't a Newegg employee. I would guess that this happened at either the Costa Rican Intel sites or in the distribution chain. D &amp; H actually has a pretty high rep, so I would guess that this was not a corporate issue even there, but an employee.</p><p>My guess is that NewEgg is going to have to do item audits in which they open random samples from their distributors to ensure this doesn't happen again.</p><p>I would guess that D&amp;H is more pi$$ed than NewEgg is about this, since this kind of thing will definitely affect stock ratings if it comes to light as their own issue. Props to Newegg for NOT going ballistic publicly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only that , I remember seeing an article on neweggs setup in one of their warehouses .
http : //www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx ? i = 2694&amp;p = 1 [ anandtech.com ] Let 's just say that between the surveillance and the other security measures I can almost guarantee this was n't a Newegg employee .
I would guess that this happened at either the Costa Rican Intel sites or in the distribution chain .
D &amp; H actually has a pretty high rep , so I would guess that this was not a corporate issue even there , but an employee.My guess is that NewEgg is going to have to do item audits in which they open random samples from their distributors to ensure this does n't happen again.I would guess that D&amp;H is more pi $ $ ed than NewEgg is about this , since this kind of thing will definitely affect stock ratings if it comes to light as their own issue .
Props to Newegg for NOT going ballistic publicly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only that, I remember seeing an article on neweggs setup in one of their warehouses.
http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=2694&amp;p=1 [anandtech.com] Let's just say that between the surveillance and the other security measures I can almost guarantee this wasn't a Newegg employee.
I would guess that this happened at either the Costa Rican Intel sites or in the distribution chain.
D &amp; H actually has a pretty high rep, so I would guess that this was not a corporate issue even there, but an employee.My guess is that NewEgg is going to have to do item audits in which they open random samples from their distributors to ensure this doesn't happen again.I would guess that D&amp;H is more pi$$ed than NewEgg is about this, since this kind of thing will definitely affect stock ratings if it comes to light as their own issue.
Props to Newegg for NOT going ballistic publicly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387748</id>
	<title>Re:easy way to tell a fake</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1267956600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>easiest way to spot an asian knockoff is if the chip is stamped "Intrel".</p></div></blockquote><p>Got it from the same place I got my <b>Relox</b> watch. Salesman drove a Nassin.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>easiest way to spot an asian knockoff is if the chip is stamped " Intrel " .Got it from the same place I got my Relox watch .
Salesman drove a Nassin .
     </tokentext>
<sentencetext>easiest way to spot an asian knockoff is if the chip is stamped "Intrel".Got it from the same place I got my Relox watch.
Salesman drove a Nassin.
     
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387322</id>
	<title>Some Newegg Customers Received Fake Intel Core i7s</title>
	<author>Bailsoft</author>
	<datestamp>1267992960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is very bizarre; I once bought a sealed Nut &amp; Bolt kit from Toys R Us only to find a game cartridge inside!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is very bizarre ; I once bought a sealed Nut &amp; Bolt kit from Toys R Us only to find a game cartridge inside !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is very bizarre; I once bought a sealed Nut &amp; Bolt kit from Toys R Us only to find a game cartridge inside!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31401066</id>
	<title>Re:It's not the first time for NewEgg</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268066280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>did you ask them which Federal Agency investigates counterfeit goods?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>did you ask them which Federal Agency investigates counterfeit goods ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>did you ask them which Federal Agency investigates counterfeit goods?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384480</id>
	<title>I blame the Chinese because ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267878240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...I'm an American and it's my patriotic duty to blame the Chinese.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...I 'm an American and it 's my patriotic duty to blame the Chinese .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I'm an American and it's my patriotic duty to blame the Chinese.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385616
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31401066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31425104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31401054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31399434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31389846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31422028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31390106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386828
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31391318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384644
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386352
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386354
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385048
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385664
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385642
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31388742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31423000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384828
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387692
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385864
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386072
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31388710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31421864
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385658
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385330
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31388742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31426910
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386276
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387136
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31391000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386140
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_2250252_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387004
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387898
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384806
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387912
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385330
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384832
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31391318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386072
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31388710
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384586
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384644
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384532
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384930
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385066
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31399434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387520
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31390352
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386140
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384818
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384754
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31391000
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384962
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385642
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385048
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385918
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385242
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386058
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31396130
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384990
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387748
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385740
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385526
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385708
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384834
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385112
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385750
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385664
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31388742
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31426910
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31423000
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384420
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385546
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384790
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387878
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386328
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387832
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31422028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385268
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31401054
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386352
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386344
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31425104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385148
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31391026
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385658
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384932
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385696
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384826
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385028
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385302
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31421864
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386410
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31390106
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386744
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384956
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31388596
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385640
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387692
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31401066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31389846
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31386318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31385082
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384480
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31387178
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_2250252.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_2250252.31384590
</commentlist>
</conversation>
