<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_06_0054235</id>
	<title>California To Create Public Animal Abuser Registry</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1267881480000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"California legislators are moving forward with plans to create a <a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1969346,00.html">public, online, animal abuser registry</a> identical in function to the public sex offender registry.  Is this the slippery slope to further government mandated lists and registries?"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " California legislators are moving forward with plans to create a public , online , animal abuser registry identical in function to the public sex offender registry .
Is this the slippery slope to further government mandated lists and registries ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "California legislators are moving forward with plans to create a public, online, animal abuser registry identical in function to the public sex offender registry.
Is this the slippery slope to further government mandated lists and registries?
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378486</id>
	<title>Don't worry...</title>
	<author>feepness</author>
	<datestamp>1267807440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's just a side effect of our state government being so flush with cash they don't even know how to spend it all!  Huzzah!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's just a side effect of our state government being so flush with cash they do n't even know how to spend it all !
Huzzah !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's just a side effect of our state government being so flush with cash they don't even know how to spend it all!
Huzzah!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377664</id>
	<title>History repeats itself</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1267799340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For reference, see Les Miserables.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For reference , see Les Miserables .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For reference, see Les Miserables.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378700</id>
	<title>Re:Just wait...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267810140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Helicopter moms" are the types that "Hover" around their children non-stop, ready to pounce on even the slightest of infractions, or the tiniest of percieved threats.</p><p>"No Timmy! Don't touch that dirty, FILTHY kitten! You don't know what kinds of disgusting bacteria could be on it! I DON'T CARE THAT IT IS CUTE! Get inside and scrub your hands with hand sanitizer, DO IT NOW!"</p><p>Yes, that kind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Helicopter moms " are the types that " Hover " around their children non-stop , ready to pounce on even the slightest of infractions , or the tiniest of percieved threats .
" No Timmy !
Do n't touch that dirty , FILTHY kitten !
You do n't know what kinds of disgusting bacteria could be on it !
I DO N'T CARE THAT IT IS CUTE !
Get inside and scrub your hands with hand sanitizer , DO IT NOW !
" Yes , that kind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Helicopter moms" are the types that "Hover" around their children non-stop, ready to pounce on even the slightest of infractions, or the tiniest of percieved threats.
"No Timmy!
Don't touch that dirty, FILTHY kitten!
You don't know what kinds of disgusting bacteria could be on it!
I DON'T CARE THAT IT IS CUTE!
Get inside and scrub your hands with hand sanitizer, DO IT NOW!
"Yes, that kind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378180</id>
	<title>Once they get so big... they become pointless...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267804560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem with "lists" and "registrys" is that they quickly become so broad, they are pointless. See our various "no fly" and "watchlists" which seemigly snags everyone and anyone because they have a common name. Its not uncommon to hear stories about babies named John or whatnot strip searched and interrogated because they are on the no fly list. While the real potential terrorists such as the gentleman over christmas who tried, and failed, to blow up an airliner had no problems purchasing his ticket at the last minute, get accompanyed to the gate by a unrelated relative, and get on an airplane. And again the same logic goes for our sex offender registries. I can pull up the list for my neighborhood, and on the map they are everywhere! Oh the horrors! When in reality, the law is so broad it not only gets the violent ones whom probally should be under close guard, but anyone for even the pettiest of sex crimes (Such as gentleman who 20 years ago when they were 18 had sex with a 17 year old, whom is probally now his wife). We dont have a registry of other convicted felons, whom most i would be more worried about than the majority of people on the sex offender registry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with " lists " and " registrys " is that they quickly become so broad , they are pointless .
See our various " no fly " and " watchlists " which seemigly snags everyone and anyone because they have a common name .
Its not uncommon to hear stories about babies named John or whatnot strip searched and interrogated because they are on the no fly list .
While the real potential terrorists such as the gentleman over christmas who tried , and failed , to blow up an airliner had no problems purchasing his ticket at the last minute , get accompanyed to the gate by a unrelated relative , and get on an airplane .
And again the same logic goes for our sex offender registries .
I can pull up the list for my neighborhood , and on the map they are everywhere !
Oh the horrors !
When in reality , the law is so broad it not only gets the violent ones whom probally should be under close guard , but anyone for even the pettiest of sex crimes ( Such as gentleman who 20 years ago when they were 18 had sex with a 17 year old , whom is probally now his wife ) .
We dont have a registry of other convicted felons , whom most i would be more worried about than the majority of people on the sex offender registry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with "lists" and "registrys" is that they quickly become so broad, they are pointless.
See our various "no fly" and "watchlists" which seemigly snags everyone and anyone because they have a common name.
Its not uncommon to hear stories about babies named John or whatnot strip searched and interrogated because they are on the no fly list.
While the real potential terrorists such as the gentleman over christmas who tried, and failed, to blow up an airliner had no problems purchasing his ticket at the last minute, get accompanyed to the gate by a unrelated relative, and get on an airplane.
And again the same logic goes for our sex offender registries.
I can pull up the list for my neighborhood, and on the map they are everywhere!
Oh the horrors!
When in reality, the law is so broad it not only gets the violent ones whom probally should be under close guard, but anyone for even the pettiest of sex crimes (Such as gentleman who 20 years ago when they were 18 had sex with a 17 year old, whom is probally now his wife).
We dont have a registry of other convicted felons, whom most i would be more worried about than the majority of people on the sex offender registry.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379594</id>
	<title>Re:Politicians and the public are..</title>
	<author>Belial6</author>
	<datestamp>1267870200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is safe to say that more killer went to public school than abused animals.  More killers ate fried eggs than abused animals, and more killers brushed their teeth thank abused animals.  If they were going to make more animal related laws, we would be much better off if they classified dogs like they should be... The same as a gun.  They could follow that up by classifying cats as they should be...the same as rats.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is safe to say that more killer went to public school than abused animals .
More killers ate fried eggs than abused animals , and more killers brushed their teeth thank abused animals .
If they were going to make more animal related laws , we would be much better off if they classified dogs like they should be... The same as a gun .
They could follow that up by classifying cats as they should be...the same as rats .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is safe to say that more killer went to public school than abused animals.
More killers ate fried eggs than abused animals, and more killers brushed their teeth thank abused animals.
If they were going to make more animal related laws, we would be much better off if they classified dogs like they should be... The same as a gun.
They could follow that up by classifying cats as they should be...the same as rats.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378994</id>
	<title>More important</title>
	<author>tthomas48</author>
	<datestamp>1267813740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's probably more important than a sexual abuse registry, since animal abuse is a strong sign of those who will become abusers and serial killers (and if you cross-reference you're probably going to get a very good handle on who you really need to be watching).</p><p>When I think about various sexual compulsions vs. a compulsion to kill the innocent and defenseless I'm going to go with the later as being far more frightening.</p><p>I'm far less frightened of the government having a database of criminals than a government that has figured out how to lock people up even after they've served their sentence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's probably more important than a sexual abuse registry , since animal abuse is a strong sign of those who will become abusers and serial killers ( and if you cross-reference you 're probably going to get a very good handle on who you really need to be watching ) .When I think about various sexual compulsions vs. a compulsion to kill the innocent and defenseless I 'm going to go with the later as being far more frightening.I 'm far less frightened of the government having a database of criminals than a government that has figured out how to lock people up even after they 've served their sentence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's probably more important than a sexual abuse registry, since animal abuse is a strong sign of those who will become abusers and serial killers (and if you cross-reference you're probably going to get a very good handle on who you really need to be watching).When I think about various sexual compulsions vs. a compulsion to kill the innocent and defenseless I'm going to go with the later as being far more frightening.I'm far less frightened of the government having a database of criminals than a government that has figured out how to lock people up even after they've served their sentence.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377902</id>
	<title>Re:Just another scarlet letter to maintain</title>
	<author>betterunixthanunix</author>
	<datestamp>1267801620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>As always, the problem is that the overwhelming majority of people do not think about anything.  Nobody stops to think about the other registries we have, or the fact that we are publicly shaming people for less and less serious crimes, or the fact that people who are released from prison are supposed to have the right to put the past behind them.<br> <br>

This is not a system that can last forever, but it is going to get a hell of a lot worse before it falls apart.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As always , the problem is that the overwhelming majority of people do not think about anything .
Nobody stops to think about the other registries we have , or the fact that we are publicly shaming people for less and less serious crimes , or the fact that people who are released from prison are supposed to have the right to put the past behind them .
This is not a system that can last forever , but it is going to get a hell of a lot worse before it falls apart .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As always, the problem is that the overwhelming majority of people do not think about anything.
Nobody stops to think about the other registries we have, or the fact that we are publicly shaming people for less and less serious crimes, or the fact that people who are released from prison are supposed to have the right to put the past behind them.
This is not a system that can last forever, but it is going to get a hell of a lot worse before it falls apart.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378598</id>
	<title>If you're a douchebag to others (people or animal)</title>
	<author>log0n</author>
	<datestamp>1267808880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then sure... everyone has the right to be warned you're a douchebag.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then sure... everyone has the right to be warned you 're a douchebag .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then sure... everyone has the right to be warned you're a douchebag.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378148</id>
	<title>Re:What about ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267804260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think under CA law, you could apply for disability.</p><p>I'll have to apply. I'm a pyronecrobestiapedophiliac. </p><p>Yes, I like to take young dead animals, light them on fire and then fuck them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think under CA law , you could apply for disability.I 'll have to apply .
I 'm a pyronecrobestiapedophiliac .
Yes , I like to take young dead animals , light them on fire and then fuck them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think under CA law, you could apply for disability.I'll have to apply.
I'm a pyronecrobestiapedophiliac.
Yes, I like to take young dead animals, light them on fire and then fuck them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377652</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870</id>
	<title>I support this.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267801200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I like to think I am as objective as they come. I am for privacy. I hate "for the children" mentality.<br> <br>
But when it comes to animal abuse, I loose some of that rationality.  Animal abusers are dangerous and cant be trusted. And I believe it is a behavior that once practiced may never leave a person. They may suppress it for the rest of their lives, but underneath the potential is there to harm people, especially given a one in a million encounter.
<br> <br>
From Wikipedia: "Cruelty to animals is one of the three components of the Macdonald triad, indicators of violent antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. According to the studies used to form this model, cruelty to animals is a common (but not with every case) behavior in children and adolescents who grow up to become serial killers and other violent criminals.
It has also been found that animal cruelty in children is frequently committed by children who have witnessed or been victims of abuse themselves. In two separate studies cited by the Humane Society of the United States roughly one-third of families suffering from domestic abuse indicated that at least one child had hurt or killed a pet.[41]".

<br> <br> Sure, let animal abusers serve their time. Even give'em a job. Good luck feeling inner piece when your daughter says she is going camping with him, when his little discresion in life was nailing a cat to a plank of wood while performing some autopsy while it was still alive. Over the course of an hour.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I like to think I am as objective as they come .
I am for privacy .
I hate " for the children " mentality .
But when it comes to animal abuse , I loose some of that rationality .
Animal abusers are dangerous and cant be trusted .
And I believe it is a behavior that once practiced may never leave a person .
They may suppress it for the rest of their lives , but underneath the potential is there to harm people , especially given a one in a million encounter .
From Wikipedia : " Cruelty to animals is one of the three components of the Macdonald triad , indicators of violent antisocial behavior in children and adolescents .
According to the studies used to form this model , cruelty to animals is a common ( but not with every case ) behavior in children and adolescents who grow up to become serial killers and other violent criminals .
It has also been found that animal cruelty in children is frequently committed by children who have witnessed or been victims of abuse themselves .
In two separate studies cited by the Humane Society of the United States roughly one-third of families suffering from domestic abuse indicated that at least one child had hurt or killed a pet. [ 41 ] " .
Sure , let animal abusers serve their time .
Even give'em a job .
Good luck feeling inner piece when your daughter says she is going camping with him , when his little discresion in life was nailing a cat to a plank of wood while performing some autopsy while it was still alive .
Over the course of an hour .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like to think I am as objective as they come.
I am for privacy.
I hate "for the children" mentality.
But when it comes to animal abuse, I loose some of that rationality.
Animal abusers are dangerous and cant be trusted.
And I believe it is a behavior that once practiced may never leave a person.
They may suppress it for the rest of their lives, but underneath the potential is there to harm people, especially given a one in a million encounter.
From Wikipedia: "Cruelty to animals is one of the three components of the Macdonald triad, indicators of violent antisocial behavior in children and adolescents.
According to the studies used to form this model, cruelty to animals is a common (but not with every case) behavior in children and adolescents who grow up to become serial killers and other violent criminals.
It has also been found that animal cruelty in children is frequently committed by children who have witnessed or been victims of abuse themselves.
In two separate studies cited by the Humane Society of the United States roughly one-third of families suffering from domestic abuse indicated that at least one child had hurt or killed a pet.[41]".
Sure, let animal abusers serve their time.
Even give'em a job.
Good luck feeling inner piece when your daughter says she is going camping with him, when his little discresion in life was nailing a cat to a plank of wood while performing some autopsy while it was still alive.
Over the course of an hour.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378916</id>
	<title>Re:What about ...</title>
	<author>jasonq</author>
	<datestamp>1267812600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>go to wales, you can have violent bestiality with a miner</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>go to wales , you can have violent bestiality with a miner</tokentext>
<sentencetext>go to wales, you can have violent bestiality with a miner</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377652</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377952</id>
	<title>Robert A Heinlein</title>
	<author>thomasw\_lrd</author>
	<datestamp>1267802220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When a place get's so large it requires registries and licenses it's time to move somewhere else.  (Paraphrased).</p><p>Sounds like it's time to move off this planet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When a place get 's so large it requires registries and licenses it 's time to move somewhere else .
( Paraphrased ) .Sounds like it 's time to move off this planet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When a place get's so large it requires registries and licenses it's time to move somewhere else.
(Paraphrased).Sounds like it's time to move off this planet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31390944</id>
	<title>Re:Politicians and the public are..</title>
	<author>aqk</author>
	<datestamp>1267983840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I was once out with a woman who trained dogs. This rather large dog went ape shit towards this woman and child. The owner of the dog <i>talked</i> to the dog and "scolded" it for its behavior. That was it. The trainer said that the owner of the dog was an idiot because one day that dog is going to attack someone and maybe seriously hurt them or kill a child. The owner should have put that dog in a head lock, slammed it into the ground, and let in know by no uncertain terms that its behavior was wrong. I guess preventing deadly attacks by dogs is now illegal.</p><p>Oh God. I'd rather have someone kick the shit out of their dog than beat the shit out of me.</p></div><p>
DAMN RIGHT! Not just a headlock. That dog owner should have beaten that shit dog to within AN INCH of that  miserable dogs life!   <br>
Hey- it works with children, doesn't it?  My friends kids all respect their elders!  They were beaten proper right!  <br>
Same goes for dogs!   <br>
An' don't let any women diss you! Just slap 'em around a bit! They'll learn!    <br>
Any dog that tries sumthin "funy" with me will quickly larn its place!  <br>
AN' THAT GOES FOR WOMENY AND KIDS TOO!  <br>
Now if you'll excuse me, I just saw this stray cat in my garbage can. I'll pour some gasoline on him and light it!   <br>
 That's how you teach cats!   It's fun too!   <br>
  <br>
  hmmmnnn... wonder if this would work with kids....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was once out with a woman who trained dogs .
This rather large dog went ape shit towards this woman and child .
The owner of the dog talked to the dog and " scolded " it for its behavior .
That was it .
The trainer said that the owner of the dog was an idiot because one day that dog is going to attack someone and maybe seriously hurt them or kill a child .
The owner should have put that dog in a head lock , slammed it into the ground , and let in know by no uncertain terms that its behavior was wrong .
I guess preventing deadly attacks by dogs is now illegal.Oh God .
I 'd rather have someone kick the shit out of their dog than beat the shit out of me .
DAMN RIGHT !
Not just a headlock .
That dog owner should have beaten that shit dog to within AN INCH of that miserable dogs life !
Hey- it works with children , does n't it ?
My friends kids all respect their elders !
They were beaten proper right !
Same goes for dogs !
An ' do n't let any women diss you !
Just slap 'em around a bit !
They 'll learn !
Any dog that tries sumthin " funy " with me will quickly larn its place !
AN ' THAT GOES FOR WOMENY AND KIDS TOO !
Now if you 'll excuse me , I just saw this stray cat in my garbage can .
I 'll pour some gasoline on him and light it !
That 's how you teach cats !
It 's fun too !
hmmmnnn... wonder if this would work with kids... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was once out with a woman who trained dogs.
This rather large dog went ape shit towards this woman and child.
The owner of the dog talked to the dog and "scolded" it for its behavior.
That was it.
The trainer said that the owner of the dog was an idiot because one day that dog is going to attack someone and maybe seriously hurt them or kill a child.
The owner should have put that dog in a head lock, slammed it into the ground, and let in know by no uncertain terms that its behavior was wrong.
I guess preventing deadly attacks by dogs is now illegal.Oh God.
I'd rather have someone kick the shit out of their dog than beat the shit out of me.
DAMN RIGHT!
Not just a headlock.
That dog owner should have beaten that shit dog to within AN INCH of that  miserable dogs life!
Hey- it works with children, doesn't it?
My friends kids all respect their elders!
They were beaten proper right!
Same goes for dogs!
An' don't let any women diss you!
Just slap 'em around a bit!
They'll learn!
Any dog that tries sumthin "funy" with me will quickly larn its place!
AN' THAT GOES FOR WOMENY AND KIDS TOO!
Now if you'll excuse me, I just saw this stray cat in my garbage can.
I'll pour some gasoline on him and light it!
That's how you teach cats!
It's fun too!
hmmmnnn... wonder if this would work with kids....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378058</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267803180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fuck California!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck California !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck California!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377734</id>
	<title>Politicians and the public are..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267799820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Cruelty to animals, it is said, is often a precursor to graver crimes.</p></div><p>Yeah, right. What orifice was that pulled out of.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It would also be a boon to law enforcement because animal abuse, the bill's authors' say, often escalates to violence against people.</p></div><p>I was once out with a woman who trained dogs. This rather large dog went ape shit towards this woman and child. The owner of the dog <i>talked</i> to the dog and "scolded" it for its behavior. That was it. The trainer said that the owner of the dog was an idiot because one day that dog is going to attack someone and maybe seriously hurt them or kill a child. The owner should have put that dog in a head lock, slammed it into the ground, and let in know by no uncertain terms that its behavior was wrong. I guess preventing deadly attacks by dogs is now illegal.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Abuses covered in the bill would include the malicious and intentional maiming, mutilation, torture, wounding or killing of a living animal.</p></div><p>Good bye pharmaceutical and any other animal based research in California! No more hunting. Oh, and when a heard of deer needs to be thinned out, does that mean they're going to ask the deer to take birth control and leave the state? Will they offer relocation to the deer? Just wanna know. </p><p><div class="quote"><p>It would also target pet hoarders...</p></div><p> Good bye private animal rescue centers!</p><p><div class="quote"><p>the issue is simple. Do Republican members<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... really want to be seen on the side of animal abuse? I don't think they do."</p></div><p>Oh God. I'd rather have someone kick the shit out of their dog than beat the shit out of me.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cruelty to animals , it is said , is often a precursor to graver crimes.Yeah , right .
What orifice was that pulled out of.It would also be a boon to law enforcement because animal abuse , the bill 's authors ' say , often escalates to violence against people.I was once out with a woman who trained dogs .
This rather large dog went ape shit towards this woman and child .
The owner of the dog talked to the dog and " scolded " it for its behavior .
That was it .
The trainer said that the owner of the dog was an idiot because one day that dog is going to attack someone and maybe seriously hurt them or kill a child .
The owner should have put that dog in a head lock , slammed it into the ground , and let in know by no uncertain terms that its behavior was wrong .
I guess preventing deadly attacks by dogs is now illegal.Abuses covered in the bill would include the malicious and intentional maiming , mutilation , torture , wounding or killing of a living animal.Good bye pharmaceutical and any other animal based research in California !
No more hunting .
Oh , and when a heard of deer needs to be thinned out , does that mean they 're going to ask the deer to take birth control and leave the state ?
Will they offer relocation to the deer ?
Just wan na know .
It would also target pet hoarders... Good bye private animal rescue centers ! the issue is simple .
Do Republican members ... really want to be seen on the side of animal abuse ?
I do n't think they do .
" Oh God .
I 'd rather have someone kick the shit out of their dog than beat the shit out of me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cruelty to animals, it is said, is often a precursor to graver crimes.Yeah, right.
What orifice was that pulled out of.It would also be a boon to law enforcement because animal abuse, the bill's authors' say, often escalates to violence against people.I was once out with a woman who trained dogs.
This rather large dog went ape shit towards this woman and child.
The owner of the dog talked to the dog and "scolded" it for its behavior.
That was it.
The trainer said that the owner of the dog was an idiot because one day that dog is going to attack someone and maybe seriously hurt them or kill a child.
The owner should have put that dog in a head lock, slammed it into the ground, and let in know by no uncertain terms that its behavior was wrong.
I guess preventing deadly attacks by dogs is now illegal.Abuses covered in the bill would include the malicious and intentional maiming, mutilation, torture, wounding or killing of a living animal.Good bye pharmaceutical and any other animal based research in California!
No more hunting.
Oh, and when a heard of deer needs to be thinned out, does that mean they're going to ask the deer to take birth control and leave the state?
Will they offer relocation to the deer?
Just wanna know.
It would also target pet hoarders... Good bye private animal rescue centers!the issue is simple.
Do Republican members ... really want to be seen on the side of animal abuse?
I don't think they do.
"Oh God.
I'd rather have someone kick the shit out of their dog than beat the shit out of me.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378124</id>
	<title>This is on the slippery slope and quite unfair...</title>
	<author>straponego</author>
	<datestamp>1267803900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Once cat-torchers have served their time, they should have a fair chance at living a useful life.  Which is why people who are cruel to animals should have much longer sentences than are currently meted out.  It's very typical to see these broken, soulless, irretrievable individuals laughing on their way into trivial jail terms.  No empathy whatsoever.<br><br>But yeah, if we must ever let them out, by all means keep them off these lists.  They've got human rights, after all.  Just install a skunk-scent anklet to protect the neighborhood pets.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Once cat-torchers have served their time , they should have a fair chance at living a useful life .
Which is why people who are cruel to animals should have much longer sentences than are currently meted out .
It 's very typical to see these broken , soulless , irretrievable individuals laughing on their way into trivial jail terms .
No empathy whatsoever.But yeah , if we must ever let them out , by all means keep them off these lists .
They 've got human rights , after all .
Just install a skunk-scent anklet to protect the neighborhood pets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once cat-torchers have served their time, they should have a fair chance at living a useful life.
Which is why people who are cruel to animals should have much longer sentences than are currently meted out.
It's very typical to see these broken, soulless, irretrievable individuals laughing on their way into trivial jail terms.
No empathy whatsoever.But yeah, if we must ever let them out, by all means keep them off these lists.
They've got human rights, after all.
Just install a skunk-scent anklet to protect the neighborhood pets.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378278</id>
	<title>Re:Politicians and the public are..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267805400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>| Cruelty to animals, it is said, is often a precursor to graver crimes.</i></p><p><i>Yeah, right. What orifice was that pulled out of.</i> </p><p>"It is said<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...." -- the certain sign of the milquetoast who passes on unsubstantiated rumor, just to hear himself mewl.</p><p>WAIT!!! -- it gets far worse that that -- do you have any idea how many poor wretches started on breast milk, then graduated to pot, heroin, PCP and some even to alcohol?</p><p>O. the ruined humanity.</p><p>Mother's milk is the ultimate gateway drug,</p><p>Join me, my brothers, in the nationwide crusade to ban tits!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>| Cruelty to animals , it is said , is often a precursor to graver crimes.Yeah , right .
What orifice was that pulled out of .
" It is said .... " -- the certain sign of the milquetoast who passes on unsubstantiated rumor , just to hear himself mewl.WAIT ! ! !
-- it gets far worse that that -- do you have any idea how many poor wretches started on breast milk , then graduated to pot , heroin , PCP and some even to alcohol ? O .
the ruined humanity.Mother 's milk is the ultimate gateway drug,Join me , my brothers , in the nationwide crusade to ban tits !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>| Cruelty to animals, it is said, is often a precursor to graver crimes.Yeah, right.
What orifice was that pulled out of.
"It is said ...." -- the certain sign of the milquetoast who passes on unsubstantiated rumor, just to hear himself mewl.WAIT!!!
-- it gets far worse that that -- do you have any idea how many poor wretches started on breast milk, then graduated to pot, heroin, PCP and some even to alcohol?O.
the ruined humanity.Mother's milk is the ultimate gateway drug,Join me, my brothers, in the nationwide crusade to ban tits!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379568</id>
	<title>Re:Just wait...</title>
	<author>ultranova</author>
	<datestamp>1267869600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, people who buy porn are clearly stupid freaks, since you can get all you can consume and more online for free, and often far sexier stuff than "professional" movies, so such people <em>should</em> be registered because they are clearly sex addicts who can't be satisfied by anything, and thus potential sex offenders.</p><p>We also need a register for people who feel the need to "cutely" misspell or half-censor porn, fuck, shit, or any other "bad" word. Not because these people are dangerous or anything, but just so the rest of us can find someone to feel superior to in a hurry when we're feeling down, you balless wimp.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , people who buy porn are clearly stupid freaks , since you can get all you can consume and more online for free , and often far sexier stuff than " professional " movies , so such people should be registered because they are clearly sex addicts who ca n't be satisfied by anything , and thus potential sex offenders.We also need a register for people who feel the need to " cutely " misspell or half-censor porn , fuck , shit , or any other " bad " word .
Not because these people are dangerous or anything , but just so the rest of us can find someone to feel superior to in a hurry when we 're feeling down , you balless wimp .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, people who buy porn are clearly stupid freaks, since you can get all you can consume and more online for free, and often far sexier stuff than "professional" movies, so such people should be registered because they are clearly sex addicts who can't be satisfied by anything, and thus potential sex offenders.We also need a register for people who feel the need to "cutely" misspell or half-censor porn, fuck, shit, or any other "bad" word.
Not because these people are dangerous or anything, but just so the rest of us can find someone to feel superior to in a hurry when we're feeling down, you balless wimp.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378750</id>
	<title>Re:I support this.</title>
	<author>corbettw</author>
	<datestamp>1267810740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I like to think I am as objective as they come.</p></div><p>As do we all.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>But when it comes to animal abuse, I loose some of that rationality. Animal abusers are dangerous and cant be trusted.</p></div><p>At least you admit to being irrational. I score you full points for that honesty. But do you really think someone who keeps 24 cats in their house and lives in squalor should be on a public registry? Or what about someone who participated in blood sports that were legal in their own country before they moved here? The first deserves our pity, the second needs either a one-way ticket back home or a quick education on what's acceptable in their new homeland. Neither needs to be saddled with this bit (pardon the puns) all their lives.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I like to think I am as objective as they come.As do we all.But when it comes to animal abuse , I loose some of that rationality .
Animal abusers are dangerous and cant be trusted.At least you admit to being irrational .
I score you full points for that honesty .
But do you really think someone who keeps 24 cats in their house and lives in squalor should be on a public registry ?
Or what about someone who participated in blood sports that were legal in their own country before they moved here ?
The first deserves our pity , the second needs either a one-way ticket back home or a quick education on what 's acceptable in their new homeland .
Neither needs to be saddled with this bit ( pardon the puns ) all their lives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like to think I am as objective as they come.As do we all.But when it comes to animal abuse, I loose some of that rationality.
Animal abusers are dangerous and cant be trusted.At least you admit to being irrational.
I score you full points for that honesty.
But do you really think someone who keeps 24 cats in their house and lives in squalor should be on a public registry?
Or what about someone who participated in blood sports that were legal in their own country before they moved here?
The first deserves our pity, the second needs either a one-way ticket back home or a quick education on what's acceptable in their new homeland.
Neither needs to be saddled with this bit (pardon the puns) all their lives.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378942</id>
	<title>Re:I support this.</title>
	<author>D Ninja</author>
	<datestamp>1267812960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But when it comes to animal abuse, I <b>loose (sic) some of that rationality</b>.</p></div><p>Exactly.  You admit yourself that you are not nearly as rational when it comes to acts of cruelty against animals.</p><p>Don't get me wrong - I love animals.  Had a number of pets as a kid.  But, lists like these ones are an extremely slippery slope and are really just politicians playing against people's fears and/or lack of rationality, or are a way to mask real problems.  Lists create an environment for a person to be judged for the rest of their life (because, ya know, everybody ELSE is messed up, but I'm perfect and can judge them) for something that they may have already been punished for.</p><p>Additionally, you also say:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Sure, let animal abusers serve their time. Even give'em a job.</p></div><p>The problem is, there will be enough people who will not only not give them a job, but they will also go out of their way to abuse and harm these individuals for something that may have been a brief, stupid adolescent move when they were young.  One punishment, and done.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Good luck feeling inner piece when your daughter says she is going camping with him, when his little discresion in life was nailing a cat to a plank of wood while performing some autopsy while it was still alive. Over the course of an hour.</p></div><p>Good grief.  Now you're just fear-mongering as well as any politician.  Heck, the fact that you can even come up with this might mean that you should be on that list...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But when it comes to animal abuse , I loose ( sic ) some of that rationality.Exactly .
You admit yourself that you are not nearly as rational when it comes to acts of cruelty against animals.Do n't get me wrong - I love animals .
Had a number of pets as a kid .
But , lists like these ones are an extremely slippery slope and are really just politicians playing against people 's fears and/or lack of rationality , or are a way to mask real problems .
Lists create an environment for a person to be judged for the rest of their life ( because , ya know , everybody ELSE is messed up , but I 'm perfect and can judge them ) for something that they may have already been punished for.Additionally , you also say : Sure , let animal abusers serve their time .
Even give'em a job.The problem is , there will be enough people who will not only not give them a job , but they will also go out of their way to abuse and harm these individuals for something that may have been a brief , stupid adolescent move when they were young .
One punishment , and done.Good luck feeling inner piece when your daughter says she is going camping with him , when his little discresion in life was nailing a cat to a plank of wood while performing some autopsy while it was still alive .
Over the course of an hour.Good grief .
Now you 're just fear-mongering as well as any politician .
Heck , the fact that you can even come up with this might mean that you should be on that list.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But when it comes to animal abuse, I loose (sic) some of that rationality.Exactly.
You admit yourself that you are not nearly as rational when it comes to acts of cruelty against animals.Don't get me wrong - I love animals.
Had a number of pets as a kid.
But, lists like these ones are an extremely slippery slope and are really just politicians playing against people's fears and/or lack of rationality, or are a way to mask real problems.
Lists create an environment for a person to be judged for the rest of their life (because, ya know, everybody ELSE is messed up, but I'm perfect and can judge them) for something that they may have already been punished for.Additionally, you also say:Sure, let animal abusers serve their time.
Even give'em a job.The problem is, there will be enough people who will not only not give them a job, but they will also go out of their way to abuse and harm these individuals for something that may have been a brief, stupid adolescent move when they were young.
One punishment, and done.Good luck feeling inner piece when your daughter says she is going camping with him, when his little discresion in life was nailing a cat to a plank of wood while performing some autopsy while it was still alive.
Over the course of an hour.Good grief.
Now you're just fear-mongering as well as any politician.
Heck, the fact that you can even come up with this might mean that you should be on that list...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378010</id>
	<title>Re: Oh NO</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1267802700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Internet Trolls!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Internet Trolls !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Internet Trolls!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378530</id>
	<title>Re:Just wait...</title>
	<author>TheVelvetFlamebait</author>
	<datestamp>1267807920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does anyone even <i>question</i> the slippery slope fallacy anymore?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone even question the slippery slope fallacy anymore ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone even question the slippery slope fallacy anymore?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378376</id>
	<title>Voiceless representation</title>
	<author>cybscryb</author>
	<datestamp>1267806300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As much as I hate more government, someone needs to be the voice that speaks for those who can not speak for themselves.

I'll have to side with the abused on this issue.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As much as I hate more government , someone needs to be the voice that speaks for those who can not speak for themselves .
I 'll have to side with the abused on this issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As much as I hate more government, someone needs to be the voice that speaks for those who can not speak for themselves.
I'll have to side with the abused on this issue.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379140</id>
	<title>Not the same</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267816680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't really see the comparison to the sex offender registry.</p><p>You can tell your children not to go near the bad mans house, but thats not going to work so well for your cat.  (And dogs have to be kept on a leash in public)</p><p>A business that works with animals can already check a prospective employees criminal background.</p><p>Its not going to prevent people abusing stray or wild animals.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't really see the comparison to the sex offender registry.You can tell your children not to go near the bad mans house , but thats not going to work so well for your cat .
( And dogs have to be kept on a leash in public ) A business that works with animals can already check a prospective employees criminal background.Its not going to prevent people abusing stray or wild animals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't really see the comparison to the sex offender registry.You can tell your children not to go near the bad mans house, but thats not going to work so well for your cat.
(And dogs have to be kept on a leash in public)A business that works with animals can already check a prospective employees criminal background.Its not going to prevent people abusing stray or wild animals.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378544</id>
	<title>Re:End run?</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1267808160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Consider that under some interpretations, failing to license your pet is "abuse"... there have already been confiscations citing a few fleas as "abuse"... In San Francisco, failing to provide "quality food" (which is not defined by their new law) is "abuse"... the ways an ordinary pet owner could find themselves on this list is endless, everyone can play!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Consider that under some interpretations , failing to license your pet is " abuse " ... there have already been confiscations citing a few fleas as " abuse " ... In San Francisco , failing to provide " quality food " ( which is not defined by their new law ) is " abuse " ... the ways an ordinary pet owner could find themselves on this list is endless , everyone can play !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Consider that under some interpretations, failing to license your pet is "abuse"... there have already been confiscations citing a few fleas as "abuse"... In San Francisco, failing to provide "quality food" (which is not defined by their new law) is "abuse"... the ways an ordinary pet owner could find themselves on this list is endless, everyone can play!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378090</id>
	<title>Re:Politicians and the public are..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267803540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><blockquote><div><p>Cruelty to animals, it is said, is often a precursor to graver crimes.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Yeah, right. What orifice was that pulled out of.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Um, that's kind of like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macdonald\_triad" title="wikipedia.org">basic criminology</a> [wikipedia.org] and stuff. Just read through the histories of a few killers on Wikipedia and see how many 'got their start' killing neighbors cats (Edward Emil Kemper lll) or burning the eyes out of crabs with matches (Andrew Cunanan).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cruelty to animals , it is said , is often a precursor to graver crimes .
Yeah , right .
What orifice was that pulled out of .
Um , that 's kind of like basic criminology [ wikipedia.org ] and stuff .
Just read through the histories of a few killers on Wikipedia and see how many 'got their start ' killing neighbors cats ( Edward Emil Kemper lll ) or burning the eyes out of crabs with matches ( Andrew Cunanan ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cruelty to animals, it is said, is often a precursor to graver crimes.
Yeah, right.
What orifice was that pulled out of.
Um, that's kind of like basic criminology [wikipedia.org] and stuff.
Just read through the histories of a few killers on Wikipedia and see how many 'got their start' killing neighbors cats (Edward Emil Kemper lll) or burning the eyes out of crabs with matches (Andrew Cunanan).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379638</id>
	<title>Re:I support this.</title>
	<author>carcosa30</author>
	<datestamp>1267871100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Loss of rationality on the subject is precisely the reason why they chose animal abusers to enact these new unconstitutional laws.</p><p>Consider: why don't they do it with murderers?  Well, because they don't think they could get the laws passed, because people like you are far more concerned about cute little puppies and cows than people.</p><p>No, they'll do this first.  Prevent the people from getting jobs, subject them to perpetual shame and humiliation.</p><p>If you think our government is concerned about animal welfare, you must be smoking some good shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Loss of rationality on the subject is precisely the reason why they chose animal abusers to enact these new unconstitutional laws.Consider : why do n't they do it with murderers ?
Well , because they do n't think they could get the laws passed , because people like you are far more concerned about cute little puppies and cows than people.No , they 'll do this first .
Prevent the people from getting jobs , subject them to perpetual shame and humiliation.If you think our government is concerned about animal welfare , you must be smoking some good shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Loss of rationality on the subject is precisely the reason why they chose animal abusers to enact these new unconstitutional laws.Consider: why don't they do it with murderers?
Well, because they don't think they could get the laws passed, because people like you are far more concerned about cute little puppies and cows than people.No, they'll do this first.
Prevent the people from getting jobs, subject them to perpetual shame and humiliation.If you think our government is concerned about animal welfare, you must be smoking some good shit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378460</id>
	<title>Re:What about those who eat meat ?</title>
	<author>h4rr4r</author>
	<datestamp>1267807260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, the animals can be humanely slaughtered. If your dinner is still alive when you eat it, then that would be animal abuse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , the animals can be humanely slaughtered .
If your dinner is still alive when you eat it , then that would be animal abuse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, the animals can be humanely slaughtered.
If your dinner is still alive when you eat it, then that would be animal abuse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378100</id>
	<title>Re:Just wait...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267803720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"Paranoid freak helicopter soccer moms"</i></p><p><i>What, exactly, does "helicopter" mean here? I mean I get the rest... but that one is just way out there in left field.<br></i> </p><p> <a href="http://lmgtfy.com/?q=helicoipter+parent" title="lmgtfy.com" rel="nofollow">http://lmgtfy.com/?q=helicoipter+parent</a> [lmgtfy.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Paranoid freak helicopter soccer moms " What , exactly , does " helicopter " mean here ?
I mean I get the rest... but that one is just way out there in left field .
http : //lmgtfy.com/ ? q = helicoipter + parent [ lmgtfy.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Paranoid freak helicopter soccer moms"What, exactly, does "helicopter" mean here?
I mean I get the rest... but that one is just way out there in left field.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=helicoipter+parent [lmgtfy.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378404</id>
	<title>Re:Just wait...</title>
	<author>Montezumaa</author>
	<datestamp>1267806540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sadly, this seems to be the way this country is moving.  Too many people attempt to attach "scarlet letters" on anyone they deem bad(and I believe animal abusers to be bad people).  The problem is that the intentions of this bill is one thing, but the implementation of the bill will be another.</p><p>Some idiot law maker or enforcement official will attempt to list a person, or people, who were never supposed to end up on the list and this will end up a catch all for all sorts of criminals.  The fact is that, once a person serves their punishment, then they are supposed to be free of any future retribution for that particular violation.  Just look at the State I live in(Georgia) and our sex offender registry.</p><p>Rather recently, non-sex offenders have ended up on the Sex Offender Registry due a change in the law here and Georgia is not the only state to do this.  I applaud the legislature's intentions, but it was ended up causing a lot of extra grief and undue burden on the people who have to maintain that list.  Now, many felonies that simply involves a minor(some that are even non-violent) are qualifying people for the sex offender registry.  Those people have to check in with local law enforcement when the move in to the area and they have to check-in and maintain the other requirements of those on the sex offender registry.</p><p>I foresee this bill, should it become law, having major challenges and being defeated fairly quickly.  It also shows the dangerous course the United States is on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly , this seems to be the way this country is moving .
Too many people attempt to attach " scarlet letters " on anyone they deem bad ( and I believe animal abusers to be bad people ) .
The problem is that the intentions of this bill is one thing , but the implementation of the bill will be another.Some idiot law maker or enforcement official will attempt to list a person , or people , who were never supposed to end up on the list and this will end up a catch all for all sorts of criminals .
The fact is that , once a person serves their punishment , then they are supposed to be free of any future retribution for that particular violation .
Just look at the State I live in ( Georgia ) and our sex offender registry.Rather recently , non-sex offenders have ended up on the Sex Offender Registry due a change in the law here and Georgia is not the only state to do this .
I applaud the legislature 's intentions , but it was ended up causing a lot of extra grief and undue burden on the people who have to maintain that list .
Now , many felonies that simply involves a minor ( some that are even non-violent ) are qualifying people for the sex offender registry .
Those people have to check in with local law enforcement when the move in to the area and they have to check-in and maintain the other requirements of those on the sex offender registry.I foresee this bill , should it become law , having major challenges and being defeated fairly quickly .
It also shows the dangerous course the United States is on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly, this seems to be the way this country is moving.
Too many people attempt to attach "scarlet letters" on anyone they deem bad(and I believe animal abusers to be bad people).
The problem is that the intentions of this bill is one thing, but the implementation of the bill will be another.Some idiot law maker or enforcement official will attempt to list a person, or people, who were never supposed to end up on the list and this will end up a catch all for all sorts of criminals.
The fact is that, once a person serves their punishment, then they are supposed to be free of any future retribution for that particular violation.
Just look at the State I live in(Georgia) and our sex offender registry.Rather recently, non-sex offenders have ended up on the Sex Offender Registry due a change in the law here and Georgia is not the only state to do this.
I applaud the legislature's intentions, but it was ended up causing a lot of extra grief and undue burden on the people who have to maintain that list.
Now, many felonies that simply involves a minor(some that are even non-violent) are qualifying people for the sex offender registry.
Those people have to check in with local law enforcement when the move in to the area and they have to check-in and maintain the other requirements of those on the sex offender registry.I foresee this bill, should it become law, having major challenges and being defeated fairly quickly.
It also shows the dangerous course the United States is on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379628</id>
	<title>Drug Offender registries are next.</title>
	<author>xanadu113</author>
	<datestamp>1267870860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Drug offender registries are next...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Drug offender registries are next.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Drug offender registries are next...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378450</id>
	<title>Your mindset is the real problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267807020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know what else is in that psychobabble worthless triad of predictors?</p><p>Bed Wetting as a kid.</p><p>So, time to sign yourself into the registry of maybe evil people that need to be tracked!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know what else is in that psychobabble worthless triad of predictors ? Bed Wetting as a kid.So , time to sign yourself into the registry of maybe evil people that need to be tracked !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know what else is in that psychobabble worthless triad of predictors?Bed Wetting as a kid.So, time to sign yourself into the registry of maybe evil people that need to be tracked!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378638</id>
	<title>Re:I support this.</title>
	<author>misexistentialist</author>
	<datestamp>1267809360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The majority of animal abuse cases do not involve psychopathic individuals. Neglect, accidents, and one-time assaults are more common and not much worse than what happens to farm animals or the billions of poor castrated pets.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The majority of animal abuse cases do not involve psychopathic individuals .
Neglect , accidents , and one-time assaults are more common and not much worse than what happens to farm animals or the billions of poor castrated pets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The majority of animal abuse cases do not involve psychopathic individuals.
Neglect, accidents, and one-time assaults are more common and not much worse than what happens to farm animals or the billions of poor castrated pets.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31380422</id>
	<title>Re:End run?</title>
	<author>osgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1267887780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People peeing on bushes are the rare outliers that no one is really gunning for.  Removing them from any lists should be a priority.</p><p>You'll forgive me if I don't shed too many tears for the repeat offenders who <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/03/05/velez-mitchell.chelsea.king/" title="cnn.com">should have been castrated.</a> [cnn.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People peeing on bushes are the rare outliers that no one is really gunning for .
Removing them from any lists should be a priority.You 'll forgive me if I do n't shed too many tears for the repeat offenders who should have been castrated .
[ cnn.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People peeing on bushes are the rare outliers that no one is really gunning for.
Removing them from any lists should be a priority.You'll forgive me if I don't shed too many tears for the repeat offenders who should have been castrated.
[cnn.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378056</id>
	<title>Re:End run?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267803180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your sig, sir:</p><p>"Beware those who would deny you Information. For in their heart they dream themselves your master."</p><p>Convictions for animal abuse are public record. They should be available so those of us who wish to know their employees, neighbors, or renters background can avoid being blindsided by some psycho. "Paying your debt to society" doesn't in any way equate to "being a permanently changed person".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your sig , sir : " Beware those who would deny you Information .
For in their heart they dream themselves your master .
" Convictions for animal abuse are public record .
They should be available so those of us who wish to know their employees , neighbors , or renters background can avoid being blindsided by some psycho .
" Paying your debt to society " does n't in any way equate to " being a permanently changed person " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your sig, sir:"Beware those who would deny you Information.
For in their heart they dream themselves your master.
"Convictions for animal abuse are public record.
They should be available so those of us who wish to know their employees, neighbors, or renters background can avoid being blindsided by some psycho.
"Paying your debt to society" doesn't in any way equate to "being a permanently changed person".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378122</id>
	<title>Re:End run?</title>
	<author>rolfwind</author>
	<datestamp>1267803900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are people on the sex offender list merely "caught" peeing in bushes and then charged with exposing themselves. And how about teens texting nude pics of themselves and charged with child porn? It has become a district attorney's game where they can claim putting X number of sex offenders away. Lots of good people's lives ruined for political bullshit. And the list itself becomes nearly worthless in telling good people from bad.</p><p>Animal abusers shouldn't be put on lists. It's disgusting what they did, they should be punished and that's it. But where is the line? If I step on some insects walking or accidently drive into an squirrel crushing it (but not killing it), will a DA who has it out for me (or is merely looking to get reelected) charge me on a high crime betting that I will plea bargain a deal that includes putting me on this list?</p><p>America has an obsession with punishing people one way or another for life (I think after people are released from prison for a felony, they can't get a passport which means they can never travel abroad again) for things that don't even approach murder/rape but with like tax evasion. We don't need to become an ever more punitive society for lesser and lesser offenses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are people on the sex offender list merely " caught " peeing in bushes and then charged with exposing themselves .
And how about teens texting nude pics of themselves and charged with child porn ?
It has become a district attorney 's game where they can claim putting X number of sex offenders away .
Lots of good people 's lives ruined for political bullshit .
And the list itself becomes nearly worthless in telling good people from bad.Animal abusers should n't be put on lists .
It 's disgusting what they did , they should be punished and that 's it .
But where is the line ?
If I step on some insects walking or accidently drive into an squirrel crushing it ( but not killing it ) , will a DA who has it out for me ( or is merely looking to get reelected ) charge me on a high crime betting that I will plea bargain a deal that includes putting me on this list ? America has an obsession with punishing people one way or another for life ( I think after people are released from prison for a felony , they ca n't get a passport which means they can never travel abroad again ) for things that do n't even approach murder/rape but with like tax evasion .
We do n't need to become an ever more punitive society for lesser and lesser offenses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are people on the sex offender list merely "caught" peeing in bushes and then charged with exposing themselves.
And how about teens texting nude pics of themselves and charged with child porn?
It has become a district attorney's game where they can claim putting X number of sex offenders away.
Lots of good people's lives ruined for political bullshit.
And the list itself becomes nearly worthless in telling good people from bad.Animal abusers shouldn't be put on lists.
It's disgusting what they did, they should be punished and that's it.
But where is the line?
If I step on some insects walking or accidently drive into an squirrel crushing it (but not killing it), will a DA who has it out for me (or is merely looking to get reelected) charge me on a high crime betting that I will plea bargain a deal that includes putting me on this list?America has an obsession with punishing people one way or another for life (I think after people are released from prison for a felony, they can't get a passport which means they can never travel abroad again) for things that don't even approach murder/rape but with like tax evasion.
We don't need to become an ever more punitive society for lesser and lesser offenses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378572</id>
	<title>Re:End run?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267808520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Punishment? I thought it was to bring you to penitence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Punishment ?
I thought it was to bring you to penitence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Punishment?
I thought it was to bring you to penitence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378604</id>
	<title>Re:Just another scarlet letter to maintain</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1267808940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I predict that it will not stop until we are ALL wearing *some* sort of scarlet letter.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p><p>BTW under other legislation being pushed by this same HSUS-backed crowd, owning more than N-many animals is "abuse" (how well they're cared for is absolutely irrelevant), and breeding pets AT ALL is also "abuse". Best-practices for some types of livestock have already been classed as "abuse". The fact is, such a registry will expand right along with these irrational laws, until everyone who owns a purebred dog is included, everyone who hunts is included, and everyone who farms is included.</p><p>And it's all about the money:</p><p>Recommended reading:<br><a href="http://humanewatch.org/index.php/site/comments/the\_humanewatch\_interview\_frank\_losey/" title="humanewatch.org">http://humanewatch.org/index.php/site/comments/the\_humanewatch\_interview\_frank\_losey/</a> [humanewatch.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I predict that it will not stop until we are ALL wearing * some * sort of scarlet letter .
: ( BTW under other legislation being pushed by this same HSUS-backed crowd , owning more than N-many animals is " abuse " ( how well they 're cared for is absolutely irrelevant ) , and breeding pets AT ALL is also " abuse " .
Best-practices for some types of livestock have already been classed as " abuse " .
The fact is , such a registry will expand right along with these irrational laws , until everyone who owns a purebred dog is included , everyone who hunts is included , and everyone who farms is included.And it 's all about the money : Recommended reading : http : //humanewatch.org/index.php/site/comments/the \ _humanewatch \ _interview \ _frank \ _losey/ [ humanewatch.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I predict that it will not stop until we are ALL wearing *some* sort of scarlet letter.
:(BTW under other legislation being pushed by this same HSUS-backed crowd, owning more than N-many animals is "abuse" (how well they're cared for is absolutely irrelevant), and breeding pets AT ALL is also "abuse".
Best-practices for some types of livestock have already been classed as "abuse".
The fact is, such a registry will expand right along with these irrational laws, until everyone who owns a purebred dog is included, everyone who hunts is included, and everyone who farms is included.And it's all about the money:Recommended reading:http://humanewatch.org/index.php/site/comments/the\_humanewatch\_interview\_frank\_losey/ [humanewatch.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378650</id>
	<title>I Abuse Animals all the time... Mmmm Burgers.</title>
	<author>Jackie\_Chan\_Fan</author>
	<datestamp>1267809480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will they put everyone who eats meat on the list?</p><p>Just a thought.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will they put everyone who eats meat on the list ? Just a thought .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will they put everyone who eats meat on the list?Just a thought.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377908</id>
	<title>The other lists...</title>
	<author>CODiNE</author>
	<datestamp>1267801740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Also reported was the decision not to make a mass-emailer's registry. Since they self-announce the list was deemed redundant and scrapped.</p><p>However THE PEOPLE WHO ALWAYS TYPE IN CAPS registry will continue as planned.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Also reported was the decision not to make a mass-emailer 's registry .
Since they self-announce the list was deemed redundant and scrapped.However THE PEOPLE WHO ALWAYS TYPE IN CAPS registry will continue as planned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also reported was the decision not to make a mass-emailer's registry.
Since they self-announce the list was deemed redundant and scrapped.However THE PEOPLE WHO ALWAYS TYPE IN CAPS registry will continue as planned.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378904</id>
	<title>Re:Just wait...</title>
	<author>jasonq</author>
	<datestamp>1267812480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's called google</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's called google</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's called google</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378352</id>
	<title>Chelsea King</title>
	<author>(arg!)Styopa</author>
	<datestamp>1267806120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another list seems relatively pointless.</p><p>Chelsea King's murderer was nicely listed.  Now an innocent 17 year old girl is dead, having probably spent the last moments of her short life in terror and misery, because she was foolish enough to go for a run.</p><p>How, precisely, did the list help her?</p><p>Personally, I think the lvl 3 sex offender list should be retitled to the "no legal consequences for murdering the scumbags on this list" list, but that's just me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another list seems relatively pointless.Chelsea King 's murderer was nicely listed .
Now an innocent 17 year old girl is dead , having probably spent the last moments of her short life in terror and misery , because she was foolish enough to go for a run.How , precisely , did the list help her ? Personally , I think the lvl 3 sex offender list should be retitled to the " no legal consequences for murdering the scumbags on this list " list , but that 's just me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another list seems relatively pointless.Chelsea King's murderer was nicely listed.
Now an innocent 17 year old girl is dead, having probably spent the last moments of her short life in terror and misery, because she was foolish enough to go for a run.How, precisely, did the list help her?Personally, I think the lvl 3 sex offender list should be retitled to the "no legal consequences for murdering the scumbags on this list" list, but that's just me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377970</id>
	<title>Re:I support this.</title>
	<author>martas</author>
	<datestamp>1267802340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>vivisection, it's called</htmltext>
<tokenext>vivisection , it 's called</tokentext>
<sentencetext>vivisection, it's called</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379588</id>
	<title>Re:Politicians and the public are..</title>
	<author>shiftless</author>
	<datestamp>1267870080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah...just like all those meth users who got their start with marijuana. Obviously marijuana is a precursor to worse drugs since those who use worse drugs usually started with marijuana. Right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah...just like all those meth users who got their start with marijuana .
Obviously marijuana is a precursor to worse drugs since those who use worse drugs usually started with marijuana .
Right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah...just like all those meth users who got their start with marijuana.
Obviously marijuana is a precursor to worse drugs since those who use worse drugs usually started with marijuana.
Right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378252</id>
	<title>So</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267805160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So they want to track PETophiles? Go for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So they want to track PETophiles ?
Go for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So they want to track PETophiles?
Go for it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378446</id>
	<title>cockfighting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267807020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't see how is that any useful, I attend a cockfight atleast 1 per week here in California LA county, and there is plenty of dogfihting, but I don't attend those.<br>Usually when the cops show up they don't arrest anybody they just give ticket to the property owner and they tell the 100s of people to just go home. Most of the times they don't even confiscate the animals. People go to this things by the 100s maybe that is why the cops don't bother arresting people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see how is that any useful , I attend a cockfight atleast 1 per week here in California LA county , and there is plenty of dogfihting , but I do n't attend those.Usually when the cops show up they do n't arrest anybody they just give ticket to the property owner and they tell the 100s of people to just go home .
Most of the times they do n't even confiscate the animals .
People go to this things by the 100s maybe that is why the cops do n't bother arresting people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see how is that any useful, I attend a cockfight atleast 1 per week here in California LA county, and there is plenty of dogfihting, but I don't attend those.Usually when the cops show up they don't arrest anybody they just give ticket to the property owner and they tell the 100s of people to just go home.
Most of the times they don't even confiscate the animals.
People go to this things by the 100s maybe that is why the cops don't bother arresting people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377660</id>
	<title>End run?</title>
	<author>headkase</author>
	<datestamp>1267799280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is this an end-run around the "served your time" part?  I thought our theory of law was that once you served your punishment you were a Citizen again (yeah like convicts can't have guns...).  So, is this indefinite punishment?  And this is coming from someone who thinks animal abusers have serious psychological problems: the real problem is what when 1000's of different "registries" exist?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this an end-run around the " served your time " part ?
I thought our theory of law was that once you served your punishment you were a Citizen again ( yeah like convicts ca n't have guns... ) .
So , is this indefinite punishment ?
And this is coming from someone who thinks animal abusers have serious psychological problems : the real problem is what when 1000 's of different " registries " exist ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this an end-run around the "served your time" part?
I thought our theory of law was that once you served your punishment you were a Citizen again (yeah like convicts can't have guns...).
So, is this indefinite punishment?
And this is coming from someone who thinks animal abusers have serious psychological problems: the real problem is what when 1000's of different "registries" exist?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378496</id>
	<title>Just what we need...</title>
	<author>sleeping143</author>
	<datestamp>1267807500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because the world is nowhere <b>near</b> judgemental enough these days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because the world is nowhere near judgemental enough these days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because the world is nowhere near judgemental enough these days.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31428796</id>
	<title>While...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268248740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the state let's people go hungry. IMO there are higher priorities of problems...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the state let 's people go hungry .
IMO there are higher priorities of problems.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the state let's people go hungry.
IMO there are higher priorities of problems...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378800</id>
	<title>Re:Just wait...</title>
	<author>ami.one</author>
	<datestamp>1267811280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I propose a public registry of Mod Point Abusers at Slashdot</htmltext>
<tokenext>I propose a public registry of Mod Point Abusers at Slashdot</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I propose a public registry of Mod Point Abusers at Slashdot</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377800</id>
	<title>Won't Someone Please Think of the Puppies?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267800540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31386698</id>
	<title>The Good, The Bad, and The Californian</title>
	<author>DynaSoar</author>
	<datestamp>1267899060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When something so off the wall starts getting put together, the irrationalities and contradictions inherent in it make it obvious the problems are severe if not fatal, and it gets shut down. Unfortunately we're talking California where it's weird's job to outdo itself. So how are they going to handle:</p><p>Cruel killing -- we can't have Dr. Kevorkian's assisted suicide for creatures with the ability to make up their own minds and say so, so who's going to speak up for the creatures unable to speak for themselves and protect them from the Death Vet?</p><p>Unbreaking the circle -- my cultural heritage places a high value on maximal participation in the Circle of Life. This means using as much of every animal as possible. I eat meat and wear leather and fur for this reason and expect to have these things available. So when an anti-fur PETA vegan acts to make these less available to me, can I level charges of racism? Better yet, will I be able to use this law to have the activists prosecuted for direct violation for attempting to prevent said creatures from achieving their full potential by being prevented from riding the Circle of Life all the way around?</p><p>Even in California people tend to fall into classifications of 'animal, vegetable, or mineral'. We can talk about getting a rock protection law in bit (igneous is no excuse) but for now, since my kids are definitely animal (in this life at least) if they get abused, will I be able to get the prep listed on this? Likewise, if I catch a dog abusing a cat or a person, can I get them listed? After all if we're going to give them the rights they deserve, shouldn't we also get ours and make sure others get theirs?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When something so off the wall starts getting put together , the irrationalities and contradictions inherent in it make it obvious the problems are severe if not fatal , and it gets shut down .
Unfortunately we 're talking California where it 's weird 's job to outdo itself .
So how are they going to handle : Cruel killing -- we ca n't have Dr. Kevorkian 's assisted suicide for creatures with the ability to make up their own minds and say so , so who 's going to speak up for the creatures unable to speak for themselves and protect them from the Death Vet ? Unbreaking the circle -- my cultural heritage places a high value on maximal participation in the Circle of Life .
This means using as much of every animal as possible .
I eat meat and wear leather and fur for this reason and expect to have these things available .
So when an anti-fur PETA vegan acts to make these less available to me , can I level charges of racism ?
Better yet , will I be able to use this law to have the activists prosecuted for direct violation for attempting to prevent said creatures from achieving their full potential by being prevented from riding the Circle of Life all the way around ? Even in California people tend to fall into classifications of 'animal , vegetable , or mineral' .
We can talk about getting a rock protection law in bit ( igneous is no excuse ) but for now , since my kids are definitely animal ( in this life at least ) if they get abused , will I be able to get the prep listed on this ?
Likewise , if I catch a dog abusing a cat or a person , can I get them listed ?
After all if we 're going to give them the rights they deserve , should n't we also get ours and make sure others get theirs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When something so off the wall starts getting put together, the irrationalities and contradictions inherent in it make it obvious the problems are severe if not fatal, and it gets shut down.
Unfortunately we're talking California where it's weird's job to outdo itself.
So how are they going to handle:Cruel killing -- we can't have Dr. Kevorkian's assisted suicide for creatures with the ability to make up their own minds and say so, so who's going to speak up for the creatures unable to speak for themselves and protect them from the Death Vet?Unbreaking the circle -- my cultural heritage places a high value on maximal participation in the Circle of Life.
This means using as much of every animal as possible.
I eat meat and wear leather and fur for this reason and expect to have these things available.
So when an anti-fur PETA vegan acts to make these less available to me, can I level charges of racism?
Better yet, will I be able to use this law to have the activists prosecuted for direct violation for attempting to prevent said creatures from achieving their full potential by being prevented from riding the Circle of Life all the way around?Even in California people tend to fall into classifications of 'animal, vegetable, or mineral'.
We can talk about getting a rock protection law in bit (igneous is no excuse) but for now, since my kids are definitely animal (in this life at least) if they get abused, will I be able to get the prep listed on this?
Likewise, if I catch a dog abusing a cat or a person, can I get them listed?
After all if we're going to give them the rights they deserve, shouldn't we also get ours and make sure others get theirs?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378982</id>
	<title>Re:Proverbial Christian Scientist w/ Appendicitis</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267813500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...the proverbial Christian Scientist with an appendicitis attack.</p></div><p>Which Proverb was about a Scientist with appendicitis? If only George Carlin was still around to show us the correct bible verse.</p><p>R.I.P. Mr. Carlin...</p><p>Sigh</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...the proverbial Christian Scientist with an appendicitis attack.Which Proverb was about a Scientist with appendicitis ?
If only George Carlin was still around to show us the correct bible verse.R.I.P .
Mr. Carlin...Sigh</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...the proverbial Christian Scientist with an appendicitis attack.Which Proverb was about a Scientist with appendicitis?
If only George Carlin was still around to show us the correct bible verse.R.I.P.
Mr. Carlin...Sigh
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378130</id>
	<title>Re:Just wait...</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1267803960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helicopter\_parent" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helicopter\_parent</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helicopter \ _parent [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helicopter\_parent [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377936</id>
	<title>Re:Politicians and the public are..</title>
	<author>wizardforce</author>
	<datestamp>1267802100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The registry is just a new way to levy another tax (on pet food) that said, the registry applies to *felony convictions of animal abuse* in California.  Unless hunting is now a felony in California, it will not show up on this list.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The registry is just a new way to levy another tax ( on pet food ) that said , the registry applies to * felony convictions of animal abuse * in California .
Unless hunting is now a felony in California , it will not show up on this list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The registry is just a new way to levy another tax (on pet food) that said, the registry applies to *felony convictions of animal abuse* in California.
Unless hunting is now a felony in California, it will not show up on this list.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377858</id>
	<title>Re:Just wait...</title>
	<author>ToastBusters</author>
	<datestamp>1267801080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It won't be long before we have public registries of parents whose kids misbehave in school</p></div><p>Probably not, but I wouldn't be surprised by a registry for teachers who taught kids who misbehave in school and were blamed by the parents for said students behavior.</p><p>Always remember: It's the teachers fault. Parents had nothing to do with it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It wo n't be long before we have public registries of parents whose kids misbehave in schoolProbably not , but I would n't be surprised by a registry for teachers who taught kids who misbehave in school and were blamed by the parents for said students behavior.Always remember : It 's the teachers fault .
Parents had nothing to do with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It won't be long before we have public registries of parents whose kids misbehave in schoolProbably not, but I wouldn't be surprised by a registry for teachers who taught kids who misbehave in school and were blamed by the parents for said students behavior.Always remember: It's the teachers fault.
Parents had nothing to do with it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378402</id>
	<title>Re:Just wait...</title>
	<author>pclminion</author>
	<datestamp>1267806540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seeing as that sexual offenses and inhumane treatment of animals are illegal, and the examples you cite are not illegal, I'm not really very worried. Once the things you mention become CRIMES, then I'll start worrying.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seeing as that sexual offenses and inhumane treatment of animals are illegal , and the examples you cite are not illegal , I 'm not really very worried .
Once the things you mention become CRIMES , then I 'll start worrying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seeing as that sexual offenses and inhumane treatment of animals are illegal, and the examples you cite are not illegal, I'm not really very worried.
Once the things you mention become CRIMES, then I'll start worrying.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378018</id>
	<title>Re:Just wait...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267802760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are constantly hovering over their kids (Simpsons reference, although the phrase may pre-date that episode).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are constantly hovering over their kids ( Simpsons reference , although the phrase may pre-date that episode ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are constantly hovering over their kids (Simpsons reference, although the phrase may pre-date that episode).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31383352</id>
	<title>Consider the options</title>
	<author>jandersen</author>
	<datestamp>1267869240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is as always a matter of considering all the options available - something that neither politicians not slashdotters seem overly familiar with. And I am not saying that I would like to have a register or registers of offenders of this or that kind; in fact I am not stating any preference.</p><p>It is not difficult to see why keeping a register is attractive or imagine who might be most against it. The question is how much of this "for or against" is actually anything but than smoke and mirrors?</p><p>On the one hand, would having a register really make our life better and more secure? It seems doubtful, seeing how all these security measures always turn out to be full of holes that the criminals soon find - so it ends up being yet another chain around the legs of ordinary citizens, while doing nothing to protect; pretty much like a talisman or a superstition.</p><p>On the other hand, when people are against being registered and supervised, how much difference does it make? If you carry a mobile, then you are already being followed in rather minute detail; if you use a credit or debit card, then your buying habits are already registered, if you have health insurance, then... well, you get the picture. You all seem to accept this as a natural part of life; so what the hell is the whining about? Yeah, a DNA register could be abused, certainly, but it could also be hugely beneficial.</p><p>The point I am trying to make here is - start looking at the real facts, not the scaring imagery that some try to paint, or the ever more hollow repetitions of lofty ideals about freedom. You've got that pint of jelly in your skull; start using it for something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is as always a matter of considering all the options available - something that neither politicians not slashdotters seem overly familiar with .
And I am not saying that I would like to have a register or registers of offenders of this or that kind ; in fact I am not stating any preference.It is not difficult to see why keeping a register is attractive or imagine who might be most against it .
The question is how much of this " for or against " is actually anything but than smoke and mirrors ? On the one hand , would having a register really make our life better and more secure ?
It seems doubtful , seeing how all these security measures always turn out to be full of holes that the criminals soon find - so it ends up being yet another chain around the legs of ordinary citizens , while doing nothing to protect ; pretty much like a talisman or a superstition.On the other hand , when people are against being registered and supervised , how much difference does it make ?
If you carry a mobile , then you are already being followed in rather minute detail ; if you use a credit or debit card , then your buying habits are already registered , if you have health insurance , then... well , you get the picture .
You all seem to accept this as a natural part of life ; so what the hell is the whining about ?
Yeah , a DNA register could be abused , certainly , but it could also be hugely beneficial.The point I am trying to make here is - start looking at the real facts , not the scaring imagery that some try to paint , or the ever more hollow repetitions of lofty ideals about freedom .
You 've got that pint of jelly in your skull ; start using it for something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is as always a matter of considering all the options available - something that neither politicians not slashdotters seem overly familiar with.
And I am not saying that I would like to have a register or registers of offenders of this or that kind; in fact I am not stating any preference.It is not difficult to see why keeping a register is attractive or imagine who might be most against it.
The question is how much of this "for or against" is actually anything but than smoke and mirrors?On the one hand, would having a register really make our life better and more secure?
It seems doubtful, seeing how all these security measures always turn out to be full of holes that the criminals soon find - so it ends up being yet another chain around the legs of ordinary citizens, while doing nothing to protect; pretty much like a talisman or a superstition.On the other hand, when people are against being registered and supervised, how much difference does it make?
If you carry a mobile, then you are already being followed in rather minute detail; if you use a credit or debit card, then your buying habits are already registered, if you have health insurance, then... well, you get the picture.
You all seem to accept this as a natural part of life; so what the hell is the whining about?
Yeah, a DNA register could be abused, certainly, but it could also be hugely beneficial.The point I am trying to make here is - start looking at the real facts, not the scaring imagery that some try to paint, or the ever more hollow repetitions of lofty ideals about freedom.
You've got that pint of jelly in your skull; start using it for something.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31408116</id>
	<title>Re:Some sicko...</title>
	<author>psithurism</author>
	<datestamp>1268054640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Some sicko tied up a cat's tail to his car and dragged it to death. I'm usually not a violent person but I still feel the urge to beat up that low-life badly, years after it happened.</p></div><p>Live in CA? Soon you'll have his name and address! So you can, er, uh, (what's the euphemism I'm looking for?) prevent future animal abuse! Yeah!</p><p>You might even find some nearby low-lives who need to be beaten badly while you peruse the new registry. Just be careful, people I know have been confused with criminals of the same name, so you might have to beat up quite few people before you find your mark.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some sicko tied up a cat 's tail to his car and dragged it to death .
I 'm usually not a violent person but I still feel the urge to beat up that low-life badly , years after it happened.Live in CA ?
Soon you 'll have his name and address !
So you can , er , uh , ( what 's the euphemism I 'm looking for ?
) prevent future animal abuse !
Yeah ! You might even find some nearby low-lives who need to be beaten badly while you peruse the new registry .
Just be careful , people I know have been confused with criminals of the same name , so you might have to beat up quite few people before you find your mark .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some sicko tied up a cat's tail to his car and dragged it to death.
I'm usually not a violent person but I still feel the urge to beat up that low-life badly, years after it happened.Live in CA?
Soon you'll have his name and address!
So you can, er, uh, (what's the euphemism I'm looking for?
) prevent future animal abuse!
Yeah!You might even find some nearby low-lives who need to be beaten badly while you peruse the new registry.
Just be careful, people I know have been confused with criminals of the same name, so you might have to beat up quite few people before you find your mark.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377880</id>
	<title>Re:Crime Statisitics</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1267801380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, but have you seen the paranoia over these "sex" offender registries? People are afraid to move into houses because there might be a "sex offender" living on the next block. Never mind that these people don't seem to look at the real picture and look at the trial and see that his only crime was peeing in public and he is now 73 years old and wheelchair bound. The point is, taxpayer funds are being used for this completely stupid project that adds nothing (who the hell cares if someone kicked a dog? I sure as hell don't), adds more debt to an already bankrupt state (next thing you know my federal taxes are going to be "bailing out" financially challenged California) and takes away rights (once you have served time, you should be treated as a full citizen, taking away voting rights for felons is honestly tyranny because they have suffered more harm by the state than anyone else, and even taking away second amendment rights I believe is questionable). <br> <br>

In short, this is a terrible idea because taxpayers are going to have to foot the bill for yet another useless project from a bankrupt state.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but have you seen the paranoia over these " sex " offender registries ?
People are afraid to move into houses because there might be a " sex offender " living on the next block .
Never mind that these people do n't seem to look at the real picture and look at the trial and see that his only crime was peeing in public and he is now 73 years old and wheelchair bound .
The point is , taxpayer funds are being used for this completely stupid project that adds nothing ( who the hell cares if someone kicked a dog ?
I sure as hell do n't ) , adds more debt to an already bankrupt state ( next thing you know my federal taxes are going to be " bailing out " financially challenged California ) and takes away rights ( once you have served time , you should be treated as a full citizen , taking away voting rights for felons is honestly tyranny because they have suffered more harm by the state than anyone else , and even taking away second amendment rights I believe is questionable ) .
In short , this is a terrible idea because taxpayers are going to have to foot the bill for yet another useless project from a bankrupt state .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but have you seen the paranoia over these "sex" offender registries?
People are afraid to move into houses because there might be a "sex offender" living on the next block.
Never mind that these people don't seem to look at the real picture and look at the trial and see that his only crime was peeing in public and he is now 73 years old and wheelchair bound.
The point is, taxpayer funds are being used for this completely stupid project that adds nothing (who the hell cares if someone kicked a dog?
I sure as hell don't), adds more debt to an already bankrupt state (next thing you know my federal taxes are going to be "bailing out" financially challenged California) and takes away rights (once you have served time, you should be treated as a full citizen, taking away voting rights for felons is honestly tyranny because they have suffered more harm by the state than anyone else, and even taking away second amendment rights I believe is questionable).
In short, this is a terrible idea because taxpayers are going to have to foot the bill for yet another useless project from a bankrupt state.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377676</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31385246</id>
	<title>Stupidity</title>
	<author>crmarvin42</author>
	<datestamp>1267884600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is assinine.  Sex offenders are frequently predators.  They will hunt down children, women, etc. to victimize.  Therefore, the registries serve the purpose of making harder for them to hunt.  The Sex Offender registries do not in fact exist for the purpose of continued punishment. <br> <br>Animal abusers on the other hand don't hunt for victims.  They are usually people who lack the empathy to see why abusing animals is wrong (young kids, gang members, etc.).  Once they are convited, it is easy to prohibit them from ever owning a pet in the future as part of their release.  With that being the case, the purpose of an animal offender registry would be to ensure that even after they are tried, convicted and pay for their crime, the punishment will continue indefinitely. <br> <br>We seem to have forgotten that people can do bad things and after being punished, regret their actions.  Sex Offender Registries are justifiable due to the high recidivism rate of offenders.  They frequently feel a compulsion to commit their crimes.  I've never heard of any studies on the recidivism rate of animal abusers, and the absence of any data, find it hard to believe that they feel any compulsion toward their transgressions.  Once the abuser has been punished, we need to learn to forgive.  If you feel that they haven't paid enough, then change the law to allow for harsher punishment.  Don't make it so that they have to go on some registry for the rest of their life for an act that they may have commited while suffering from a temporary laps in judgement, or for somethin they may never do again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is assinine .
Sex offenders are frequently predators .
They will hunt down children , women , etc .
to victimize .
Therefore , the registries serve the purpose of making harder for them to hunt .
The Sex Offender registries do not in fact exist for the purpose of continued punishment .
Animal abusers on the other hand do n't hunt for victims .
They are usually people who lack the empathy to see why abusing animals is wrong ( young kids , gang members , etc. ) .
Once they are convited , it is easy to prohibit them from ever owning a pet in the future as part of their release .
With that being the case , the purpose of an animal offender registry would be to ensure that even after they are tried , convicted and pay for their crime , the punishment will continue indefinitely .
We seem to have forgotten that people can do bad things and after being punished , regret their actions .
Sex Offender Registries are justifiable due to the high recidivism rate of offenders .
They frequently feel a compulsion to commit their crimes .
I 've never heard of any studies on the recidivism rate of animal abusers , and the absence of any data , find it hard to believe that they feel any compulsion toward their transgressions .
Once the abuser has been punished , we need to learn to forgive .
If you feel that they have n't paid enough , then change the law to allow for harsher punishment .
Do n't make it so that they have to go on some registry for the rest of their life for an act that they may have commited while suffering from a temporary laps in judgement , or for somethin they may never do again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is assinine.
Sex offenders are frequently predators.
They will hunt down children, women, etc.
to victimize.
Therefore, the registries serve the purpose of making harder for them to hunt.
The Sex Offender registries do not in fact exist for the purpose of continued punishment.
Animal abusers on the other hand don't hunt for victims.
They are usually people who lack the empathy to see why abusing animals is wrong (young kids, gang members, etc.).
Once they are convited, it is easy to prohibit them from ever owning a pet in the future as part of their release.
With that being the case, the purpose of an animal offender registry would be to ensure that even after they are tried, convicted and pay for their crime, the punishment will continue indefinitely.
We seem to have forgotten that people can do bad things and after being punished, regret their actions.
Sex Offender Registries are justifiable due to the high recidivism rate of offenders.
They frequently feel a compulsion to commit their crimes.
I've never heard of any studies on the recidivism rate of animal abusers, and the absence of any data, find it hard to believe that they feel any compulsion toward their transgressions.
Once the abuser has been punished, we need to learn to forgive.
If you feel that they haven't paid enough, then change the law to allow for harsher punishment.
Don't make it so that they have to go on some registry for the rest of their life for an act that they may have commited while suffering from a temporary laps in judgement, or for somethin they may never do again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378298</id>
	<title>Re:I support this.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267805580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, "I hate "for the children" mentality."</p><p>However, "Good luck feeling inner piece when your daughter says she is going camping with him, when his little discretion in life was nailing a cat to a plank of wood while performing some autopsy while it was still alive."</p><p>huh...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , " I hate " for the children " mentality .
" However , " Good luck feeling inner piece when your daughter says she is going camping with him , when his little discretion in life was nailing a cat to a plank of wood while performing some autopsy while it was still alive .
" huh.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, "I hate "for the children" mentality.
"However, "Good luck feeling inner piece when your daughter says she is going camping with him, when his little discretion in life was nailing a cat to a plank of wood while performing some autopsy while it was still alive.
"huh...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31401014</id>
	<title>What a waste</title>
	<author>gryf</author>
	<datestamp>1268065980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Glad to hear the state's finally running a surplus again. I'm sure this means they've got their spending priorities under control.
<p>
Please people, regardless of the benefits a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/statewide/ animal control registry provides ( on the assumption that CA govt can provide anything effectively ) you have to balance that against maintaining funding for school programs, criminal justice programs ( like State appointed attorneys ), environmental protection programs.
</p><p>
The state has been in the red for eight years, how can any elected official there justify creating any new program?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Glad to hear the state 's finally running a surplus again .
I 'm sure this means they 've got their spending priorities under control .
Please people , regardless of the benefits a /statewide/ animal control registry provides ( on the assumption that CA govt can provide anything effectively ) you have to balance that against maintaining funding for school programs , criminal justice programs ( like State appointed attorneys ) , environmental protection programs .
The state has been in the red for eight years , how can any elected official there justify creating any new program ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Glad to hear the state's finally running a surplus again.
I'm sure this means they've got their spending priorities under control.
Please people, regardless of the benefits a /statewide/ animal control registry provides ( on the assumption that CA govt can provide anything effectively ) you have to balance that against maintaining funding for school programs, criminal justice programs ( like State appointed attorneys ), environmental protection programs.
The state has been in the red for eight years, how can any elected official there justify creating any new program?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378088</id>
	<title>buying pr0n</title>
	<author>Mistakill</author>
	<datestamp>1267803540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It won't be long before we have public registries of parents whose kids misbehave in school, registries of people who buy pr0n, and registries of people who do anything else the masses of paranoid freak helicopter soccer moms don't like...</p></div><p>
wait... people <b>buy</b> pr0n? what???? doing it wrong<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It wo n't be long before we have public registries of parents whose kids misbehave in school , registries of people who buy pr0n , and registries of people who do anything else the masses of paranoid freak helicopter soccer moms do n't like.. . wait... people buy pr0n ?
what ? ? ? ? doing it wrong ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It won't be long before we have public registries of parents whose kids misbehave in school, registries of people who buy pr0n, and registries of people who do anything else the masses of paranoid freak helicopter soccer moms don't like...
wait... people buy pr0n?
what???? doing it wrong ;)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377614</id>
	<title>Sounds Good To Me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267798980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>There will always be a stigma associated to certain types of crimes. Animal abuse is one of them. Long after they serve their far too short sentences they will still get to live with what they've done<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and we'll get to share the knowledge of their past with them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There will always be a stigma associated to certain types of crimes .
Animal abuse is one of them .
Long after they serve their far too short sentences they will still get to live with what they 've done ... and we 'll get to share the knowledge of their past with them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There will always be a stigma associated to certain types of crimes.
Animal abuse is one of them.
Long after they serve their far too short sentences they will still get to live with what they've done ... and we'll get to share the knowledge of their past with them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378250</id>
	<title>Re:I support this.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267805160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sure, let animal abusers serve their time. Even give'em a job. Good luck feeling inner piece when your daughter says she is going camping with him, when his little discresion in life was nailing a cat to a plank of wood while performing some autopsy while it was still alive. Over the course of an hour.</p></div><p>Or just send them to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill\_Frist#Medical\_school\_experiments" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">United States Senate</a> [wikipedia.org], where they belong.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , let animal abusers serve their time .
Even give'em a job .
Good luck feeling inner piece when your daughter says she is going camping with him , when his little discresion in life was nailing a cat to a plank of wood while performing some autopsy while it was still alive .
Over the course of an hour.Or just send them to the United States Senate [ wikipedia.org ] , where they belong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, let animal abusers serve their time.
Even give'em a job.
Good luck feeling inner piece when your daughter says she is going camping with him, when his little discresion in life was nailing a cat to a plank of wood while performing some autopsy while it was still alive.
Over the course of an hour.Or just send them to the United States Senate [wikipedia.org], where they belong.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378108</id>
	<title>Good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267803840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They may be 'just animals' to most people, but that's like saying it's 'just cruelty.'  There is something inherently wrong with enjoying inflicting pain on a helpless victim.  In that sense, it is not different than abusing or molesting a human child. The principles are the same.  Blah blah blah about putting animals and humans on the same level.  That's just a runaround argument people who don't understand the full scope of the problem use.</p><p>People who abuse animals include those who fight dogs- who also run other illegal activities and make money this way, instead of getting an honest job, and getting to inflict their dissatisfaction with the world on an animal that they bred and raised only to kill for sport.  Maybe having a public registry won't matter- look at Michael Vick, he's doing as well as he ever has, despite having been responsible for the unnecessarily cruel and violent death of dogs that didn't want to fight.   And then people continue to condemn pitbulls as killers, when it's humans that kill them.</p><p>The issue is not, at its root, how animals are being treated.  The issue is what kind of behaviors we will condone in society.  Killing for a purpose- like farming, is utilitarian, necessary for people who eat meat.  Vegetarians kill vegetables.  Something has to die for something else to live.  But killing for pleasure, killing to see the pain and suffering of a victim, is inhumane, it's sick and people who do it should be publicly flogged, not quietly chided.  And yes, some workers in meat production plants should also be thrown in jail.  Torture isn't necessary in the death of a food animal, and some of those workers do horrific things in addition to a necessary death.  People who do these kinds of things aren't functioning members of society and if they lived on my block, I would want to know about it.  People treat each other like shit, and that will never change until we start respecting smaller forms of life.</p><p>I'm sick of people who wave away responsible citizenship as overkill.  Especially in a city where dogs are stolen from backyards to be bait for some worthless piece of crap's blood sport.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They may be 'just animals ' to most people , but that 's like saying it 's 'just cruelty .
' There is something inherently wrong with enjoying inflicting pain on a helpless victim .
In that sense , it is not different than abusing or molesting a human child .
The principles are the same .
Blah blah blah about putting animals and humans on the same level .
That 's just a runaround argument people who do n't understand the full scope of the problem use.People who abuse animals include those who fight dogs- who also run other illegal activities and make money this way , instead of getting an honest job , and getting to inflict their dissatisfaction with the world on an animal that they bred and raised only to kill for sport .
Maybe having a public registry wo n't matter- look at Michael Vick , he 's doing as well as he ever has , despite having been responsible for the unnecessarily cruel and violent death of dogs that did n't want to fight .
And then people continue to condemn pitbulls as killers , when it 's humans that kill them.The issue is not , at its root , how animals are being treated .
The issue is what kind of behaviors we will condone in society .
Killing for a purpose- like farming , is utilitarian , necessary for people who eat meat .
Vegetarians kill vegetables .
Something has to die for something else to live .
But killing for pleasure , killing to see the pain and suffering of a victim , is inhumane , it 's sick and people who do it should be publicly flogged , not quietly chided .
And yes , some workers in meat production plants should also be thrown in jail .
Torture is n't necessary in the death of a food animal , and some of those workers do horrific things in addition to a necessary death .
People who do these kinds of things are n't functioning members of society and if they lived on my block , I would want to know about it .
People treat each other like shit , and that will never change until we start respecting smaller forms of life.I 'm sick of people who wave away responsible citizenship as overkill .
Especially in a city where dogs are stolen from backyards to be bait for some worthless piece of crap 's blood sport .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They may be 'just animals' to most people, but that's like saying it's 'just cruelty.
'  There is something inherently wrong with enjoying inflicting pain on a helpless victim.
In that sense, it is not different than abusing or molesting a human child.
The principles are the same.
Blah blah blah about putting animals and humans on the same level.
That's just a runaround argument people who don't understand the full scope of the problem use.People who abuse animals include those who fight dogs- who also run other illegal activities and make money this way, instead of getting an honest job, and getting to inflict their dissatisfaction with the world on an animal that they bred and raised only to kill for sport.
Maybe having a public registry won't matter- look at Michael Vick, he's doing as well as he ever has, despite having been responsible for the unnecessarily cruel and violent death of dogs that didn't want to fight.
And then people continue to condemn pitbulls as killers, when it's humans that kill them.The issue is not, at its root, how animals are being treated.
The issue is what kind of behaviors we will condone in society.
Killing for a purpose- like farming, is utilitarian, necessary for people who eat meat.
Vegetarians kill vegetables.
Something has to die for something else to live.
But killing for pleasure, killing to see the pain and suffering of a victim, is inhumane, it's sick and people who do it should be publicly flogged, not quietly chided.
And yes, some workers in meat production plants should also be thrown in jail.
Torture isn't necessary in the death of a food animal, and some of those workers do horrific things in addition to a necessary death.
People who do these kinds of things aren't functioning members of society and if they lived on my block, I would want to know about it.
People treat each other like shit, and that will never change until we start respecting smaller forms of life.I'm sick of people who wave away responsible citizenship as overkill.
Especially in a city where dogs are stolen from backyards to be bait for some worthless piece of crap's blood sport.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31381422</id>
	<title>Why not DUI registry</title>
	<author>skogula</author>
	<datestamp>1267898160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've always thought that there should be a registry for people who repeatedly drive drunk.   a few years ago I read a paper that compared stats. For every child that was kidnapped by a non-family member, 18 children were killed by a drunk driver in a vehicle other than the one they were in.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've always thought that there should be a registry for people who repeatedly drive drunk .
a few years ago I read a paper that compared stats .
For every child that was kidnapped by a non-family member , 18 children were killed by a drunk driver in a vehicle other than the one they were in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've always thought that there should be a registry for people who repeatedly drive drunk.
a few years ago I read a paper that compared stats.
For every child that was kidnapped by a non-family member, 18 children were killed by a drunk driver in a vehicle other than the one they were in.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378458</id>
	<title>Re:What about ...</title>
	<author>tophermeyer</author>
	<datestamp>1267807200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Violent bestiality with a minor?</p></div><p>Pics or it didn't happen.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Violent bestiality with a minor ? Pics or it did n't happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Violent bestiality with a minor?Pics or it didn't happen.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377652</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377944</id>
	<title>Serial Killers violate animals</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267802160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hopefully all the would be serial killers will get caught and put in the registry when they're teenagers.That way the police will have access to some record of their perverted and sick minds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully all the would be serial killers will get caught and put in the registry when they 're teenagers.That way the police will have access to some record of their perverted and sick minds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully all the would be serial killers will get caught and put in the registry when they're teenagers.That way the police will have access to some record of their perverted and sick minds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31380550</id>
	<title>indefinite punishment</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1267889340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Also means indefinite servitude to the government since you cant get a job..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Also means indefinite servitude to the government since you cant get a job. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also means indefinite servitude to the government since you cant get a job..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379058</id>
	<title>Re:Politicians and the public are..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267814940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, so everyone who has ever kicked a puppy should be on the short list of mass murder suspects.  Excuse me sir, you didnt clean your cats litter box regularly enough, and theres a serial killer around, you need to come with us for questioning.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , so everyone who has ever kicked a puppy should be on the short list of mass murder suspects .
Excuse me sir , you didnt clean your cats litter box regularly enough , and theres a serial killer around , you need to come with us for questioning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, so everyone who has ever kicked a puppy should be on the short list of mass murder suspects.
Excuse me sir, you didnt clean your cats litter box regularly enough, and theres a serial killer around, you need to come with us for questioning.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378090</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379576</id>
	<title>Of course</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267869840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The follow up law will ban animal abusers from living within 1000' of any animals!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The follow up law will ban animal abusers from living within 1000 ' of any animals !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The follow up law will ban animal abusers from living within 1000' of any animals!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31380694</id>
	<title>Aint got nothin' to hide</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267890660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... the real problem is what when 1000's of different "registries" exist?</p></div><p>We have a registry of people who are against the registry. You've just been registered. We want EVERYBODY to know who all the people are, that are against our righteous and noble cause.</p><p>If you don't have anything to hide, then you should be happy to be on our Registry. Look for your name on a telephone booth or Website near you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... the real problem is what when 1000 's of different " registries " exist ? We have a registry of people who are against the registry .
You 've just been registered .
We want EVERYBODY to know who all the people are , that are against our righteous and noble cause.If you do n't have anything to hide , then you should be happy to be on our Registry .
Look for your name on a telephone booth or Website near you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... the real problem is what when 1000's of different "registries" exist?We have a registry of people who are against the registry.
You've just been registered.
We want EVERYBODY to know who all the people are, that are against our righteous and noble cause.If you don't have anything to hide, then you should be happy to be on our Registry.
Look for your name on a telephone booth or Website near you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377934</id>
	<title>Re:Politicians and the public are..</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1267802100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> No more hunting. Oh, and when a heard of deer needs to be thinned out, does that mean they're going to ask the deer to take birth control and leave the state?</p> </div><p>

Yes, actually that is what they do. I'm from the midwest and in a city (I think it was near Kansas City) they were proposing opening a small (like 1 week) hunting season in this park that was overwhelmed with deer (far beyond the carrying capacity and people kept hitting deer left and right) and they seriously proposed putting birth control or something in the food to stop this overpopulation. And this is in Missouri where the first day of deer season practically is a state holiday! Let alone what the idiots in California are thinking. <br> <br>

Here is a link about it: (can't find primary source but this is as good as any that helps show how stupid these people are) <a href="http://www.shawneedispatch.com/news/2009/sep/17/protests-deer-hunt-shawnee-mission-park-continue/" title="shawneedispatch.com">http://www.shawneedispatch.com/news/2009/sep/17/protests-deer-hunt-shawnee-mission-park-continue/</a> [shawneedispatch.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No more hunting .
Oh , and when a heard of deer needs to be thinned out , does that mean they 're going to ask the deer to take birth control and leave the state ?
Yes , actually that is what they do .
I 'm from the midwest and in a city ( I think it was near Kansas City ) they were proposing opening a small ( like 1 week ) hunting season in this park that was overwhelmed with deer ( far beyond the carrying capacity and people kept hitting deer left and right ) and they seriously proposed putting birth control or something in the food to stop this overpopulation .
And this is in Missouri where the first day of deer season practically is a state holiday !
Let alone what the idiots in California are thinking .
Here is a link about it : ( ca n't find primary source but this is as good as any that helps show how stupid these people are ) http : //www.shawneedispatch.com/news/2009/sep/17/protests-deer-hunt-shawnee-mission-park-continue/ [ shawneedispatch.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext> No more hunting.
Oh, and when a heard of deer needs to be thinned out, does that mean they're going to ask the deer to take birth control and leave the state?
Yes, actually that is what they do.
I'm from the midwest and in a city (I think it was near Kansas City) they were proposing opening a small (like 1 week) hunting season in this park that was overwhelmed with deer (far beyond the carrying capacity and people kept hitting deer left and right) and they seriously proposed putting birth control or something in the food to stop this overpopulation.
And this is in Missouri where the first day of deer season practically is a state holiday!
Let alone what the idiots in California are thinking.
Here is a link about it: (can't find primary source but this is as good as any that helps show how stupid these people are) http://www.shawneedispatch.com/news/2009/sep/17/protests-deer-hunt-shawnee-mission-park-continue/ [shawneedispatch.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378224</id>
	<title>Oh for the love of...</title>
	<author>Jhon</author>
	<datestamp>1267804980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I cannot begin to express my frustration with my state legislators.  I'm living in a state that is not only one of highest taxed states in the union (and in many cases *THE* highest taxed state), but also the state with one of the worst budget problems in the union!  Every penny spent on this exercise could be better used paying off it's $6 billion budget gap (soon to be $20+ billion next year) PER YEAR!.  It's quite possible we'll default on some of our bond's this year!</p><p>Look -- I'm all for harsh punishment for ANYONE who causes sadistic pain on man or beast -- but for the love of all that's holy, I don't need to know that there's a guy who bagged and drowned a cat living within a 1/4 mile of me!  Not at any cost.  And not in this economy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can not begin to express my frustration with my state legislators .
I 'm living in a state that is not only one of highest taxed states in the union ( and in many cases * THE * highest taxed state ) , but also the state with one of the worst budget problems in the union !
Every penny spent on this exercise could be better used paying off it 's $ 6 billion budget gap ( soon to be $ 20 + billion next year ) PER YEAR ! .
It 's quite possible we 'll default on some of our bond 's this year ! Look -- I 'm all for harsh punishment for ANYONE who causes sadistic pain on man or beast -- but for the love of all that 's holy , I do n't need to know that there 's a guy who bagged and drowned a cat living within a 1/4 mile of me !
Not at any cost .
And not in this economy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I cannot begin to express my frustration with my state legislators.
I'm living in a state that is not only one of highest taxed states in the union (and in many cases *THE* highest taxed state), but also the state with one of the worst budget problems in the union!
Every penny spent on this exercise could be better used paying off it's $6 billion budget gap (soon to be $20+ billion next year) PER YEAR!.
It's quite possible we'll default on some of our bond's this year!Look -- I'm all for harsh punishment for ANYONE who causes sadistic pain on man or beast -- but for the love of all that's holy, I don't need to know that there's a guy who bagged and drowned a cat living within a 1/4 mile of me!
Not at any cost.
And not in this economy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378710</id>
	<title>Re:I support this.</title>
	<author>outsider007</author>
	<datestamp>1267810260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If we follow this logic we would also need a bed wetters registry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If we follow this logic we would also need a bed wetters registry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If we follow this logic we would also need a bed wetters registry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31380506</id>
	<title>Re:End run?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267888860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Political correctness run wild.  Yes, I would prefer EITHER that people do their time and are preferably rehabilitated OR at least be honest and lock the incurable sociopaths up forever.  Minnesota has been at the forefront of this sort of thing with their sex offenders.  After they have done their time, then they go to the psychiatric prison until the psychologists decide they can be released.  \_VERY\_ constitutionally dicey, one would have thought, but it's been going on for years.</p><p>Registries can almost have worse effects.  People with histories of child abuse might not be the most desirable new neighbors but there are documented cases where these people have been forced to become homeless nomads because virtually nobody will rent to them or hire them.  What sort of life, and likely criminal acts, does that funnel them into?  And, if I'm not mistaken, I believe I read that the incidence of repeat offending is high but less than 50-50 so nowhere near the unbeatable compulsion and certainty that the social meme commonly assumes.  So for every person who's still potentially dangerous, society is crapping on somebody who wouldn't be if given a break and allowed to go on with his life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Political correctness run wild .
Yes , I would prefer EITHER that people do their time and are preferably rehabilitated OR at least be honest and lock the incurable sociopaths up forever .
Minnesota has been at the forefront of this sort of thing with their sex offenders .
After they have done their time , then they go to the psychiatric prison until the psychologists decide they can be released .
\ _VERY \ _ constitutionally dicey , one would have thought , but it 's been going on for years.Registries can almost have worse effects .
People with histories of child abuse might not be the most desirable new neighbors but there are documented cases where these people have been forced to become homeless nomads because virtually nobody will rent to them or hire them .
What sort of life , and likely criminal acts , does that funnel them into ?
And , if I 'm not mistaken , I believe I read that the incidence of repeat offending is high but less than 50-50 so nowhere near the unbeatable compulsion and certainty that the social meme commonly assumes .
So for every person who 's still potentially dangerous , society is crapping on somebody who would n't be if given a break and allowed to go on with his life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Political correctness run wild.
Yes, I would prefer EITHER that people do their time and are preferably rehabilitated OR at least be honest and lock the incurable sociopaths up forever.
Minnesota has been at the forefront of this sort of thing with their sex offenders.
After they have done their time, then they go to the psychiatric prison until the psychologists decide they can be released.
\_VERY\_ constitutionally dicey, one would have thought, but it's been going on for years.Registries can almost have worse effects.
People with histories of child abuse might not be the most desirable new neighbors but there are documented cases where these people have been forced to become homeless nomads because virtually nobody will rent to them or hire them.
What sort of life, and likely criminal acts, does that funnel them into?
And, if I'm not mistaken, I believe I read that the incidence of repeat offending is high but less than 50-50 so nowhere near the unbeatable compulsion and certainty that the social meme commonly assumes.
So for every person who's still potentially dangerous, society is crapping on somebody who wouldn't be if given a break and allowed to go on with his life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378782</id>
	<title>Re:Just wait...</title>
	<author>bertoelcon</author>
	<datestamp>1267811160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>registries of people who buy pr0n,</p></div><p>Most empty list of them all. Perhaps a list of people who bought sex toys.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>the masses of paranoid freak helicopter soccer moms</p></div><p>Crap, that would be a big chunk of the sex toy list.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>registries of people who buy pr0n,Most empty list of them all .
Perhaps a list of people who bought sex toys.the masses of paranoid freak helicopter soccer momsCrap , that would be a big chunk of the sex toy list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>registries of people who buy pr0n,Most empty list of them all.
Perhaps a list of people who bought sex toys.the masses of paranoid freak helicopter soccer momsCrap, that would be a big chunk of the sex toy list.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379604</id>
	<title>Some sicko...</title>
	<author>xororand</author>
	<datestamp>1267870500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some sicko tied up a cat's tail to his car and dragged it to death. I'm usually not a violent person but I still feel the urge to beat up that low-life badly, years after it happened.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some sicko tied up a cat 's tail to his car and dragged it to death .
I 'm usually not a violent person but I still feel the urge to beat up that low-life badly , years after it happened .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some sicko tied up a cat's tail to his car and dragged it to death.
I'm usually not a violent person but I still feel the urge to beat up that low-life badly, years after it happened.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377690</id>
	<title>there's a new tax too</title>
	<author>wizardforce</author>
	<datestamp>1267799460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently they estimate that it will take several hundred thousand dollars to run the registry annually and claim that the number of federal convictions for animal abuse in California is not large enough to levy enough fees on the convicted to fund the registry.  In short, they want to levy a tax on pet food to pay for the registry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently they estimate that it will take several hundred thousand dollars to run the registry annually and claim that the number of federal convictions for animal abuse in California is not large enough to levy enough fees on the convicted to fund the registry .
In short , they want to levy a tax on pet food to pay for the registry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently they estimate that it will take several hundred thousand dollars to run the registry annually and claim that the number of federal convictions for animal abuse in California is not large enough to levy enough fees on the convicted to fund the registry.
In short, they want to levy a tax on pet food to pay for the registry.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31391250</id>
	<title>Re:So, what next?</title>
	<author>aqk</author>
	<datestamp>1267985340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>public online registry of slashdotters. ? <br>
 <br>
Nah...   Just brand 'em with a big  <strong><nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. </strong>   right on their forehead!</htmltext>
<tokenext>public online registry of slashdotters .
? Nah... Just brand 'em with a big / .
right on their forehead !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>public online registry of slashdotters.
? 
 
Nah...   Just brand 'em with a big   /.
right on their forehead!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31391778</id>
	<title>There's an app for that?</title>
	<author>DiEx-15</author>
	<datestamp>1267988220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Damn you Steve Jobs!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn you Steve Jobs !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn you Steve Jobs!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378370</id>
	<title>What's the big deal?</title>
	<author>maillemaker</author>
	<datestamp>1267806180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't understand the outcry of privacy advocates here.</p><p>All matters of criminal law are matters of public record, as they should be.</p><p>Making this information easily searchable is just technology, folks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand the outcry of privacy advocates here.All matters of criminal law are matters of public record , as they should be.Making this information easily searchable is just technology , folks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand the outcry of privacy advocates here.All matters of criminal law are matters of public record, as they should be.Making this information easily searchable is just technology, folks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378908</id>
	<title>slippery slope</title>
	<author>cas2000</author>
	<datestamp>1267812540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>Is this the slippery slope to further government mandated lists and registries?</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>no.  the beginning of the slippery slope was the introduction of sex-offender registers.  as has been amply proven by this new register.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this the slippery slope to further government mandated lists and registries ?
no. the beginning of the slippery slope was the introduction of sex-offender registers .
as has been amply proven by this new register .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Is this the slippery slope to further government mandated lists and registries?
no.  the beginning of the slippery slope was the introduction of sex-offender registers.
as has been amply proven by this new register.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379470</id>
	<title>Re:Crime Statisitics</title>
	<author>AK Marc</author>
	<datestamp>1267867140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>IIRC all crime statistics are public knowledge anyway. If a person is convicted of a crime, this is recorded and this record is made available to the public.
<br>
It wouldn't be impossible to establish a 'registry of serious criminals' using only scannings on newspaper articles and the like. The data is already public, it just needs to be collated together.</i> <br> <br>Really?  So how do I find out if the person living next to me is on the list?  I don't have his name, he's a renter, so not in the public record.  Unless everything is owner occupied, there will be a disconnect.</htmltext>
<tokenext>IIRC all crime statistics are public knowledge anyway .
If a person is convicted of a crime , this is recorded and this record is made available to the public .
It would n't be impossible to establish a 'registry of serious criminals ' using only scannings on newspaper articles and the like .
The data is already public , it just needs to be collated together .
Really ? So how do I find out if the person living next to me is on the list ?
I do n't have his name , he 's a renter , so not in the public record .
Unless everything is owner occupied , there will be a disconnect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IIRC all crime statistics are public knowledge anyway.
If a person is convicted of a crime, this is recorded and this record is made available to the public.
It wouldn't be impossible to establish a 'registry of serious criminals' using only scannings on newspaper articles and the like.
The data is already public, it just needs to be collated together.
Really?  So how do I find out if the person living next to me is on the list?
I don't have his name, he's a renter, so not in the public record.
Unless everything is owner occupied, there will be a disconnect.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377676</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378506</id>
	<title>How about a law abuser registry?</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1267807560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We could have a registry for all people who abuse the laws and their political positions. I guess we already have one, that being the list of anyone who's ever served in office.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We could have a registry for all people who abuse the laws and their political positions .
I guess we already have one , that being the list of anyone who 's ever served in office .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We could have a registry for all people who abuse the laws and their political positions.
I guess we already have one, that being the list of anyone who's ever served in office.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377792</id>
	<title>Just another scarlet letter to maintain</title>
	<author>ishmalius</author>
	<datestamp>1267800420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does the country really need yet another list like this?  How much more of the shun/banish behaviour must we exhibit in our increasingly shrill nation?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does the country really need yet another list like this ?
How much more of the shun/banish behaviour must we exhibit in our increasingly shrill nation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does the country really need yet another list like this?
How much more of the shun/banish behaviour must we exhibit in our increasingly shrill nation?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31380496</id>
	<title>Re:On the fence on this one, and my stomach hurts</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267888800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's easy to spot animal abusers. They aren't very nice people.<br>Unfortunately, too many people are completely emotionally blind, and unable to recognise evil when they see it.<br>There is a simple solution to this problem - just make the prison sentences MUCH longer, and allow THE PEOPLE to decide the length of those sentences.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's easy to spot animal abusers .
They are n't very nice people.Unfortunately , too many people are completely emotionally blind , and unable to recognise evil when they see it.There is a simple solution to this problem - just make the prison sentences MUCH longer , and allow THE PEOPLE to decide the length of those sentences .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's easy to spot animal abusers.
They aren't very nice people.Unfortunately, too many people are completely emotionally blind, and unable to recognise evil when they see it.There is a simple solution to this problem - just make the prison sentences MUCH longer, and allow THE PEOPLE to decide the length of those sentences.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377888</id>
	<title>Re:Just wait...</title>
	<author>X0563511</author>
	<datestamp>1267801500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Paranoid freak helicopter soccer moms"</p><p>What, exactly, does "helicopter" mean here? I mean I get the rest... but that one is just way out there in left field.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Paranoid freak helicopter soccer moms " What , exactly , does " helicopter " mean here ?
I mean I get the rest... but that one is just way out there in left field .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Paranoid freak helicopter soccer moms"What, exactly, does "helicopter" mean here?
I mean I get the rest... but that one is just way out there in left field.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31380472</id>
	<title>All CA residents with LQ60 should move to NH</title>
	<author>AlexLibman</author>
	<datestamp>1267888560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously.</p><p>FreeStateProject.org</p><p>LQ = libertarian quotient.</p><p>Those who stay deserve whatever they will get.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously.FreeStateProject.orgLQ = libertarian quotient.Those who stay deserve whatever they will get .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.FreeStateProject.orgLQ = libertarian quotient.Those who stay deserve whatever they will get.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31380326</id>
	<title>Re:History repeats itself</title>
	<author>AlexBirch</author>
	<datestamp>1267886760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>D'oh and all this time I thought that Les Miserables was a fictional work... now I'll have to rethink Quasimoto was treated.</htmltext>
<tokenext>D'oh and all this time I thought that Les Miserables was a fictional work... now I 'll have to rethink Quasimoto was treated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>D'oh and all this time I thought that Les Miserables was a fictional work... now I'll have to rethink Quasimoto was treated.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379622</id>
	<title>Glad I left CA</title>
	<author>LBt1st</author>
	<datestamp>1267870740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>California should be more concerned with the fact that the state is just about bankrupt with one of the highest unemployment rates in the country.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>California should be more concerned with the fact that the state is just about bankrupt with one of the highest unemployment rates in the country .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>California should be more concerned with the fact that the state is just about bankrupt with one of the highest unemployment rates in the country.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378334</id>
	<title>our situation summed up poetically.</title>
	<author>the simurgh</author>
	<datestamp>1267805940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>ode to the folly of men....
when they demanded that all pedophiles register, i said nothing for i was not one of them.
when they demanded that all the criminals register, i said nothing for i was not a criminal.
when they demanded that all immigrants register, i said nothing for i was not a immigrants.
when they demanded that all superheroes register , i said nothing for i was not a superhero.
when they demanded the super scientists to register, i said nothing for i was not a super scientist.
then they demanded i register and there was nothing i could do, for all the others were already under their thumbs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>ode to the folly of men... . when they demanded that all pedophiles register , i said nothing for i was not one of them .
when they demanded that all the criminals register , i said nothing for i was not a criminal .
when they demanded that all immigrants register , i said nothing for i was not a immigrants .
when they demanded that all superheroes register , i said nothing for i was not a superhero .
when they demanded the super scientists to register , i said nothing for i was not a super scientist .
then they demanded i register and there was nothing i could do , for all the others were already under their thumbs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ode to the folly of men....
when they demanded that all pedophiles register, i said nothing for i was not one of them.
when they demanded that all the criminals register, i said nothing for i was not a criminal.
when they demanded that all immigrants register, i said nothing for i was not a immigrants.
when they demanded that all superheroes register , i said nothing for i was not a superhero.
when they demanded the super scientists to register, i said nothing for i was not a super scientist.
then they demanded i register and there was nothing i could do, for all the others were already under their thumbs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377676</id>
	<title>Crime Statisitics</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267799400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IIRC all crime statistics are public knowledge anyway. If a person is convicted of a crime, this is recorded and this record is made available to the public.</p><p>It wouldn't be impossible to establish a 'registry of serious criminals' using only scannings on newspaper articles and the like. The data is already public, it just needs to be collated together.</p><p>Of course, I know I'm being simplistic... there's a lot more to it than that, but I don't want to right an essay on the implimentation, merely point out that it is possible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IIRC all crime statistics are public knowledge anyway .
If a person is convicted of a crime , this is recorded and this record is made available to the public.It would n't be impossible to establish a 'registry of serious criminals ' using only scannings on newspaper articles and the like .
The data is already public , it just needs to be collated together.Of course , I know I 'm being simplistic... there 's a lot more to it than that , but I do n't want to right an essay on the implimentation , merely point out that it is possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IIRC all crime statistics are public knowledge anyway.
If a person is convicted of a crime, this is recorded and this record is made available to the public.It wouldn't be impossible to establish a 'registry of serious criminals' using only scannings on newspaper articles and the like.
The data is already public, it just needs to be collated together.Of course, I know I'm being simplistic... there's a lot more to it than that, but I don't want to right an essay on the implimentation, merely point out that it is possible.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378730</id>
	<title>Re:What about ...</title>
	<author>mglmnc</author>
	<datestamp>1267810500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>One cancels the other one out, you're free to go</htmltext>
<tokenext>One cancels the other one out , you 're free to go</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One cancels the other one out, you're free to go</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377652</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378212</id>
	<title>Ooh, yes, I want to abuse public animals.</title>
	<author>Michael Woodhams</author>
	<datestamp>1267804920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please sign me up.</p><p>(RTFA? All I need to read is the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. headline.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please sign me up. ( RTFA ?
All I need to read is the / .
headline. )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please sign me up.(RTFA?
All I need to read is the /.
headline.)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379826</id>
	<title>No validity without meat indusry on the list</title>
	<author>Br'er Lappin</author>
	<datestamp>1267875600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are the meat, dairy, puppy mill, and zoo industries going to be included on this list? If not, it's worthless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are the meat , dairy , puppy mill , and zoo industries going to be included on this list ?
If not , it 's worthless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are the meat, dairy, puppy mill, and zoo industries going to be included on this list?
If not, it's worthless.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378294</id>
	<title>We need an...</title>
	<author>Black Gold Alchemist</author>
	<datestamp>1267805580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>..idiotic politician registry. Fortunately, it will be very easy to create. Just add up every the names of the politicians in the every congress, house, senate, and parliament in the world. Throw in the presidents and kings, delete all the dupes, and you're done. Now you know if an idiot lives near you!</htmltext>
<tokenext>..idiotic politician registry .
Fortunately , it will be very easy to create .
Just add up every the names of the politicians in the every congress , house , senate , and parliament in the world .
Throw in the presidents and kings , delete all the dupes , and you 're done .
Now you know if an idiot lives near you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..idiotic politician registry.
Fortunately, it will be very easy to create.
Just add up every the names of the politicians in the every congress, house, senate, and parliament in the world.
Throw in the presidents and kings, delete all the dupes, and you're done.
Now you know if an idiot lives near you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377844</id>
	<title>Re:End run?</title>
	<author>ScrewMaster</author>
	<datestamp>1267800900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>the real problem is what when 1000's of different "registries" exist?</p></div><p>.
I think they already exist, it's just that most of us aren't aware of them, or at least don't have access to their contents (the TSA's "no-fly" list being a prime example.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the real problem is what when 1000 's of different " registries " exist ? .
I think they already exist , it 's just that most of us are n't aware of them , or at least do n't have access to their contents ( the TSA 's " no-fly " list being a prime example .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the real problem is what when 1000's of different "registries" exist?.
I think they already exist, it's just that most of us aren't aware of them, or at least don't have access to their contents (the TSA's "no-fly" list being a prime example.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379560</id>
	<title>You mercilessly kill them for food ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267869480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look who's talking? You are responsible for so many animal cruelities and torture due wrong eating habbits. And yet u like to talk about animal cruelity! Lord is watching and justice would be done.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look who 's talking ?
You are responsible for so many animal cruelities and torture due wrong eating habbits .
And yet u like to talk about animal cruelity !
Lord is watching and justice would be done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look who's talking?
You are responsible for so many animal cruelities and torture due wrong eating habbits.
And yet u like to talk about animal cruelity!
Lord is watching and justice would be done.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378488</id>
	<title>Whatever</title>
	<author>Carl.E.Pierre</author>
	<datestamp>1267807440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whatever
<p>*Goes back to spanking his monkey*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whatever * Goes back to spanking his monkey *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whatever
*Goes back to spanking his monkey*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378382</id>
	<title>What about those who eat meat ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267806300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about those who eat meat ?<br>Isn't eating meat animal abuse ?<br>Land of the free ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about those who eat meat ? Is n't eating meat animal abuse ? Land of the free ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about those who eat meat ?Isn't eating meat animal abuse ?Land of the free ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377896</id>
	<title>Biased against zoophiles</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267801560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For people who are psychopaths that are killing and abusing animals this is a good idea. I am tired of reading about people who buy a bunch of animals and let them waste away, or hurt them, or do stupid things like dogfighting. Animal abusers almost always human abusers.</p><p>However for people who are zoophiles this will shame them in a very public way. Imagine having a public registry for homosexuals who are arrested for sodomy, for example. I'm not equating the two, other than saying it can be used to humiliate people who have tastes that aren't accepted by society (sodomy is illegal in several states, as is bestiality). Of course anyone committing violent sex acts should be registered, but then again those people are not zoophiles.</p><p>I hope they restrict this registry to those who commit violent crimes. People who don't understand zoophilia are too quick to lump together somebody who wants to kill an animal along with somebody who has found a partner in one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For people who are psychopaths that are killing and abusing animals this is a good idea .
I am tired of reading about people who buy a bunch of animals and let them waste away , or hurt them , or do stupid things like dogfighting .
Animal abusers almost always human abusers.However for people who are zoophiles this will shame them in a very public way .
Imagine having a public registry for homosexuals who are arrested for sodomy , for example .
I 'm not equating the two , other than saying it can be used to humiliate people who have tastes that are n't accepted by society ( sodomy is illegal in several states , as is bestiality ) .
Of course anyone committing violent sex acts should be registered , but then again those people are not zoophiles.I hope they restrict this registry to those who commit violent crimes .
People who do n't understand zoophilia are too quick to lump together somebody who wants to kill an animal along with somebody who has found a partner in one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For people who are psychopaths that are killing and abusing animals this is a good idea.
I am tired of reading about people who buy a bunch of animals and let them waste away, or hurt them, or do stupid things like dogfighting.
Animal abusers almost always human abusers.However for people who are zoophiles this will shame them in a very public way.
Imagine having a public registry for homosexuals who are arrested for sodomy, for example.
I'm not equating the two, other than saying it can be used to humiliate people who have tastes that aren't accepted by society (sodomy is illegal in several states, as is bestiality).
Of course anyone committing violent sex acts should be registered, but then again those people are not zoophiles.I hope they restrict this registry to those who commit violent crimes.
People who don't understand zoophilia are too quick to lump together somebody who wants to kill an animal along with somebody who has found a partner in one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379690</id>
	<title>Re:On the fence on this one, and my stomach hurts</title>
	<author>Com2Kid</author>
	<datestamp>1267872180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>That would be the folks who think that animal abusers should be tortured, castrated, deprived of their children, burned out of their homes,</p></div></blockquote><p>And the problem with any of those is?</p><p>Hey I think I know how California could pay for this registry without any new taxes!  Pay Per View events!  $20 to see an animal torcherer get stoned to death.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That would be the folks who think that animal abusers should be tortured , castrated , deprived of their children , burned out of their homes,And the problem with any of those is ? Hey I think I know how California could pay for this registry without any new taxes !
Pay Per View events !
$ 20 to see an animal torcherer get stoned to death .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would be the folks who think that animal abusers should be tortured, castrated, deprived of their children, burned out of their homes,And the problem with any of those is?Hey I think I know how California could pay for this registry without any new taxes!
Pay Per View events!
$20 to see an animal torcherer get stoned to death.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378408</id>
	<title>Re:History repeats itself</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267806600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I will see your Miserables and raise you a Scarlet Letter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I will see your Miserables and raise you a Scarlet Letter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I will see your Miserables and raise you a Scarlet Letter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377790</id>
	<title>So, what next?</title>
	<author>Xamusk</author>
	<datestamp>1267800420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Next time they will create a public online registry of slashdotters.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Next time they will create a public online registry of slashdotters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next time they will create a public online registry of slashdotters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378954</id>
	<title>Re:End run?</title>
	<author>Mr. Freeman</author>
	<datestamp>1267813080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"avoid being blindsided by some phycho"? What?<br><br>Explain how you, as an employer, might be "blindsided" by someone that has a history of animal abuse.<br>Explain how you, as a neighbor, might be "blindsided" by someone that has a history of animal abuse.  And be careful. "I asked him to watch my dog and he killed it" is not being blindsided.  When you put your trust in someone with something as precious as your pets without actually knowing the person well enough (you know, by TALKING TO THEM OVER A PERIOD OF TIME, not looking them up in some database) then you'll ALWAYS be blindsided because you're a damn fool.<br>Explain how you, as a landlord, might be "blindsided" be someone that has a history of animal abuse.<br><br>Until you explain these things then you're really doing nothing but creating hysteria.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" avoid being blindsided by some phycho " ?
What ? Explain how you , as an employer , might be " blindsided " by someone that has a history of animal abuse.Explain how you , as a neighbor , might be " blindsided " by someone that has a history of animal abuse .
And be careful .
" I asked him to watch my dog and he killed it " is not being blindsided .
When you put your trust in someone with something as precious as your pets without actually knowing the person well enough ( you know , by TALKING TO THEM OVER A PERIOD OF TIME , not looking them up in some database ) then you 'll ALWAYS be blindsided because you 're a damn fool.Explain how you , as a landlord , might be " blindsided " be someone that has a history of animal abuse.Until you explain these things then you 're really doing nothing but creating hysteria .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"avoid being blindsided by some phycho"?
What?Explain how you, as an employer, might be "blindsided" by someone that has a history of animal abuse.Explain how you, as a neighbor, might be "blindsided" by someone that has a history of animal abuse.
And be careful.
"I asked him to watch my dog and he killed it" is not being blindsided.
When you put your trust in someone with something as precious as your pets without actually knowing the person well enough (you know, by TALKING TO THEM OVER A PERIOD OF TIME, not looking them up in some database) then you'll ALWAYS be blindsided because you're a damn fool.Explain how you, as a landlord, might be "blindsided" be someone that has a history of animal abuse.Until you explain these things then you're really doing nothing but creating hysteria.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378022</id>
	<title>Re:Just wait...</title>
	<author>debrisslider</author>
	<datestamp>1267802820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It means someone who is constantly hovering over their kid's shoulder (in some cases almost quite literally) as in overprotectively smothering them and often interfering with school and other activities.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It means someone who is constantly hovering over their kid 's shoulder ( in some cases almost quite literally ) as in overprotectively smothering them and often interfering with school and other activities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It means someone who is constantly hovering over their kid's shoulder (in some cases almost quite literally) as in overprotectively smothering them and often interfering with school and other activities.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31380154</id>
	<title>Other types of registry any time soon?</title>
	<author>jbatista</author>
	<datestamp>1267884300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Will this also open a precedent which will allow other types of registry to be created any time soon? I'm thinking: employee abuser registry; tax evader registry; etc.

Let's rat on everyone else!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will this also open a precedent which will allow other types of registry to be created any time soon ?
I 'm thinking : employee abuser registry ; tax evader registry ; etc .
Let 's rat on everyone else !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will this also open a precedent which will allow other types of registry to be created any time soon?
I'm thinking: employee abuser registry; tax evader registry; etc.
Let's rat on everyone else!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377984</id>
	<title>Your rights online?</title>
	<author>thomasw\_lrd</author>
	<datestamp>1267802520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is this a yro, and how the hell does it relate to news for nerds?  I mean come on.  Give me some more apple and google stories.  Slow news day I guess.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this a yro , and how the hell does it relate to news for nerds ?
I mean come on .
Give me some more apple and google stories .
Slow news day I guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this a yro, and how the hell does it relate to news for nerds?
I mean come on.
Give me some more apple and google stories.
Slow news day I guess.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31399868</id>
	<title>I think it is a good idea</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1268059020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having dogs myself, I get sickened when I see an obvious neglect for a dog, let alone abuse, I think this would be a good thing, however, it might get used to get back at someone or play pranks, as long as there is a starting of a case, then someone is assigned to go<br>observe the environment to see if it is a real case of abuse or not. Sometimes people are neglectful and not on purpose, getting a wake up call with someone declaring them anonymously, is all it takes sometimes to make them realize although dogs are not humans, they are animals that deserve to live as much as we do, and that existence should not be to in a cage 8 hours a day, followed by "go sit in your corner" for the rest of it......seriously.</p><p>I hope that this can help the organizations like the SPCA get better results, however, let's say this does a better job and we take away abused pets more now then before, the SPCA has a policy of putting to sleep dogs after a period of time, and this is not acceptable, we need to also dedicate some resources towards finding a better solution to helping us find good homes for those animals.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having dogs myself , I get sickened when I see an obvious neglect for a dog , let alone abuse , I think this would be a good thing , however , it might get used to get back at someone or play pranks , as long as there is a starting of a case , then someone is assigned to goobserve the environment to see if it is a real case of abuse or not .
Sometimes people are neglectful and not on purpose , getting a wake up call with someone declaring them anonymously , is all it takes sometimes to make them realize although dogs are not humans , they are animals that deserve to live as much as we do , and that existence should not be to in a cage 8 hours a day , followed by " go sit in your corner " for the rest of it......seriously.I hope that this can help the organizations like the SPCA get better results , however , let 's say this does a better job and we take away abused pets more now then before , the SPCA has a policy of putting to sleep dogs after a period of time , and this is not acceptable , we need to also dedicate some resources towards finding a better solution to helping us find good homes for those animals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having dogs myself, I get sickened when I see an obvious neglect for a dog, let alone abuse, I think this would be a good thing, however, it might get used to get back at someone or play pranks, as long as there is a starting of a case, then someone is assigned to goobserve the environment to see if it is a real case of abuse or not.
Sometimes people are neglectful and not on purpose, getting a wake up call with someone declaring them anonymously, is all it takes sometimes to make them realize although dogs are not humans, they are animals that deserve to live as much as we do, and that existence should not be to in a cage 8 hours a day, followed by "go sit in your corner" for the rest of it......seriously.I hope that this can help the organizations like the SPCA get better results, however, let's say this does a better job and we take away abused pets more now then before, the SPCA has a policy of putting to sleep dogs after a period of time, and this is not acceptable, we need to also dedicate some resources towards finding a better solution to helping us find good homes for those animals.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377652</id>
	<title>What about ...</title>
	<author>Bob\_Who</author>
	<datestamp>1267799280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Violent bestiality with a minor?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Violent bestiality with a minor ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Violent bestiality with a minor?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378012</id>
	<title>Re:I support this.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267802700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are trying to establish a reverse causality link. It doesn't work like that. How many people that commit an act of "animal abuse" grow up to be serial killers? There is no data on that, but I would imagine it to be pretty small. Obviously, I can't substantiate my claim, but neither can you. So in the end, you are giving no better argument than the "for the children" one that you claim to hate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are trying to establish a reverse causality link .
It does n't work like that .
How many people that commit an act of " animal abuse " grow up to be serial killers ?
There is no data on that , but I would imagine it to be pretty small .
Obviously , I ca n't substantiate my claim , but neither can you .
So in the end , you are giving no better argument than the " for the children " one that you claim to hate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are trying to establish a reverse causality link.
It doesn't work like that.
How many people that commit an act of "animal abuse" grow up to be serial killers?
There is no data on that, but I would imagine it to be pretty small.
Obviously, I can't substantiate my claim, but neither can you.
So in the end, you are giving no better argument than the "for the children" one that you claim to hate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379546</id>
	<title>Re:End run?</title>
	<author>shiftless</author>
	<datestamp>1267869240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i> If I<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... accidently <b>drive into</b> an squirrel <b>crushing it (but not killing it)</b> </i></p><p>???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I ... accidently drive into an squirrel crushing it ( but not killing it ) ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> If I ... accidently drive into an squirrel crushing it (but not killing it) ??
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378210</id>
	<title>Re:I support this.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267804920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Ok, great reason to create a registry of Bedwetters also, then  (however).
</p><p>
Whenever you move into a new house, you will be required to inform all your new neighbors that you were a persistent bedwetter past the age of 5.
</p><p>
Since all past bedwetters are dangerous and cannot be trusted.  It is a behavior that once practiced may never leave the person.  They may suppress it for the rest of their lives, but underneath the potential is there especially given a one in a million encounter.
</p><p>
From Wikipedia: "The triad links animal cruelty, obsession with fire setting, and <b>persistent bedwetting past the age of five</b> to violent behaviors; particularly homicidal behavior"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , great reason to create a registry of Bedwetters also , then ( however ) .
Whenever you move into a new house , you will be required to inform all your new neighbors that you were a persistent bedwetter past the age of 5 .
Since all past bedwetters are dangerous and can not be trusted .
It is a behavior that once practiced may never leave the person .
They may suppress it for the rest of their lives , but underneath the potential is there especially given a one in a million encounter .
From Wikipedia : " The triad links animal cruelty , obsession with fire setting , and persistent bedwetting past the age of five to violent behaviors ; particularly homicidal behavior "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Ok, great reason to create a registry of Bedwetters also, then  (however).
Whenever you move into a new house, you will be required to inform all your new neighbors that you were a persistent bedwetter past the age of 5.
Since all past bedwetters are dangerous and cannot be trusted.
It is a behavior that once practiced may never leave the person.
They may suppress it for the rest of their lives, but underneath the potential is there especially given a one in a million encounter.
From Wikipedia: "The triad links animal cruelty, obsession with fire setting, and persistent bedwetting past the age of five to violent behaviors; particularly homicidal behavior"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642</id>
	<title>Just wait...</title>
	<author>EmagGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1267799220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It won't be long before we have public registries of parents whose kids misbehave in school, registries of people who buy pr0n, and registries of people who do anything else the masses of paranoid freak helicopter soccer moms don't like...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It wo n't be long before we have public registries of parents whose kids misbehave in school , registries of people who buy pr0n , and registries of people who do anything else the masses of paranoid freak helicopter soccer moms do n't like.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It won't be long before we have public registries of parents whose kids misbehave in school, registries of people who buy pr0n, and registries of people who do anything else the masses of paranoid freak helicopter soccer moms don't like...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378292</id>
	<title>So let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>athlon02</author>
	<datestamp>1267805520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>a state that every American, with any kind of attention span, knows is broke and needs to CUT spending is creating more financially wasteful bureaucracy.  California you truly love to live up to your title as the land of fruits and nuts, don't you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>a state that every American , with any kind of attention span , knows is broke and needs to CUT spending is creating more financially wasteful bureaucracy .
California you truly love to live up to your title as the land of fruits and nuts , do n't you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a state that every American, with any kind of attention span, knows is broke and needs to CUT spending is creating more financially wasteful bureaucracy.
California you truly love to live up to your title as the land of fruits and nuts, don't you?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378346</id>
	<title>On the fence on this one, and my stomach hurts</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267806060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As somebody who (a) values privacy and finds government's invasion of it abhorrent; but (b) has seen some of the results of chronic animal abuse, I feel a bit like the proverbial Christian Scientist with an appendicitis attack.</p><p>From the animal-rescue point of view, the world is full of crazy and vicious people who cruise around "adopting" animals for subsequent abuse. This includes dogfighters looking for bait, people who produce crush films, hoarders, puppy mill operators, crazed cat ladies, people who practice killing and torture rituals, and even idiots who just want a fresh puppy every year or so. Most animal adoptions take place on a sort of honor system, the potential for abuse is huge, the actual amount of abuse going on is both shocking and sickening, and there simply isn't any money for any investigation or follow-up.</p><p>From the invasion of privacy standpoint, it should be observed that there are also plenty of animal-loving lunatics abroad in the land. That would be the folks who think that animal abusers should be tortured, castrated, deprived of their children, burned out of their homes, or otherwise "suitably" punished for their misdeeds. People exist who believe that the death penalty as it's administered here is too mild for animal abusers. Such a list in their hands would be downright dangerous.</p><p>There must be a way that law enforcement could share information regarding convicted abusers with licensed shelters and rescue groups without making such information readily and publicly available in a one-stop database.</p><p>Sigh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As somebody who ( a ) values privacy and finds government 's invasion of it abhorrent ; but ( b ) has seen some of the results of chronic animal abuse , I feel a bit like the proverbial Christian Scientist with an appendicitis attack.From the animal-rescue point of view , the world is full of crazy and vicious people who cruise around " adopting " animals for subsequent abuse .
This includes dogfighters looking for bait , people who produce crush films , hoarders , puppy mill operators , crazed cat ladies , people who practice killing and torture rituals , and even idiots who just want a fresh puppy every year or so .
Most animal adoptions take place on a sort of honor system , the potential for abuse is huge , the actual amount of abuse going on is both shocking and sickening , and there simply is n't any money for any investigation or follow-up.From the invasion of privacy standpoint , it should be observed that there are also plenty of animal-loving lunatics abroad in the land .
That would be the folks who think that animal abusers should be tortured , castrated , deprived of their children , burned out of their homes , or otherwise " suitably " punished for their misdeeds .
People exist who believe that the death penalty as it 's administered here is too mild for animal abusers .
Such a list in their hands would be downright dangerous.There must be a way that law enforcement could share information regarding convicted abusers with licensed shelters and rescue groups without making such information readily and publicly available in a one-stop database.Sigh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As somebody who (a) values privacy and finds government's invasion of it abhorrent; but (b) has seen some of the results of chronic animal abuse, I feel a bit like the proverbial Christian Scientist with an appendicitis attack.From the animal-rescue point of view, the world is full of crazy and vicious people who cruise around "adopting" animals for subsequent abuse.
This includes dogfighters looking for bait, people who produce crush films, hoarders, puppy mill operators, crazed cat ladies, people who practice killing and torture rituals, and even idiots who just want a fresh puppy every year or so.
Most animal adoptions take place on a sort of honor system, the potential for abuse is huge, the actual amount of abuse going on is both shocking and sickening, and there simply isn't any money for any investigation or follow-up.From the invasion of privacy standpoint, it should be observed that there are also plenty of animal-loving lunatics abroad in the land.
That would be the folks who think that animal abusers should be tortured, castrated, deprived of their children, burned out of their homes, or otherwise "suitably" punished for their misdeeds.
People exist who believe that the death penalty as it's administered here is too mild for animal abusers.
Such a list in their hands would be downright dangerous.There must be a way that law enforcement could share information regarding convicted abusers with licensed shelters and rescue groups without making such information readily and publicly available in a one-stop database.Sigh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379292</id>
	<title>.\_.-:-:\_</title>
	<author>Therilith</author>
	<datestamp>1267905900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The vegetarian animal rights hippie in me thinks this is a great idea.<br>
<br>
The rest of me is going on about slippery slopes as usual.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The vegetarian animal rights hippie in me thinks this is a great idea .
The rest of me is going on about slippery slopes as usual .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The vegetarian animal rights hippie in me thinks this is a great idea.
The rest of me is going on about slippery slopes as usual.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377936
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31391250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31380326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377902
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31390944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31408116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31391778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31380496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378604
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31380694
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31380422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31380506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378022
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31380550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_06_0054235_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31380326
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378460
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378908
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31380496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378982
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378370
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377676
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377880
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377908
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378730
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378148
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377642
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378088
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378782
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377888
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378022
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378130
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378018
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378700
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377858
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377614
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378446
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377934
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378090
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379058
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379594
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31390944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378278
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31391250
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31380694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378544
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378122
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31380422
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379546
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31380506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378056
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31380550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377844
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379638
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378012
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378638
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378750
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377902
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31379604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31408116
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377800
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377952
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378108
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31377690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31391778
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_06_0054235.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_06_0054235.31378224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
