<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_03_05_2014201</id>
	<title>Microsoft "Courier" Pictures</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1267785060000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>tekgoblin writes to let us know that Gizmodo has some early shots of the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5365299/courier-first-details-of-microsofts-secret-tablet">new prototype "Courier" booklet</a> (foldable tablet) on the way from Microsoft.  <i>"Courier is a real device, and we've heard that it's in the 'late prototype' stage of development. It's not a tablet, it's a booklet. The dual 7-inch (or so) screens are multitouch, and designed for writing, flicking and drawing with a stylus, in addition to fingers. They're connected by a hinge that holds a single iPhone-esque home button. Statuses, like wireless signal and battery life, are displayed along the rim of one of the screens. On the back cover is a camera, and it might charge through an inductive pad, like the Palm Touchstone charging dock for Pre."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>tekgoblin writes to let us know that Gizmodo has some early shots of the new prototype " Courier " booklet ( foldable tablet ) on the way from Microsoft .
" Courier is a real device , and we 've heard that it 's in the 'late prototype ' stage of development .
It 's not a tablet , it 's a booklet .
The dual 7-inch ( or so ) screens are multitouch , and designed for writing , flicking and drawing with a stylus , in addition to fingers .
They 're connected by a hinge that holds a single iPhone-esque home button .
Statuses , like wireless signal and battery life , are displayed along the rim of one of the screens .
On the back cover is a camera , and it might charge through an inductive pad , like the Palm Touchstone charging dock for Pre .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>tekgoblin writes to let us know that Gizmodo has some early shots of the new prototype "Courier" booklet (foldable tablet) on the way from Microsoft.
"Courier is a real device, and we've heard that it's in the 'late prototype' stage of development.
It's not a tablet, it's a booklet.
The dual 7-inch (or so) screens are multitouch, and designed for writing, flicking and drawing with a stylus, in addition to fingers.
They're connected by a hinge that holds a single iPhone-esque home button.
Statuses, like wireless signal and battery life, are displayed along the rim of one of the screens.
On the back cover is a camera, and it might charge through an inductive pad, like the Palm Touchstone charging dock for Pre.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31380414</id>
	<title>Re:That's right, because handwriting on screens ru</title>
	<author>Idbar</author>
	<datestamp>1267887720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I just can't understand why Microsoft seems so obsessed with the idea that everybody's going to want to interact with a computer using a pen.</p></div><p>Perhaps because like me, I find very hard to draw diagrams, and equations with my fingers or typing "latex-like" when in class or a meeting? <br> <br>To your question then answer yourself what is the obsession of having blackboards in conference rooms if they have projectors? To me, it's easy interaction.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just ca n't understand why Microsoft seems so obsessed with the idea that everybody 's going to want to interact with a computer using a pen.Perhaps because like me , I find very hard to draw diagrams , and equations with my fingers or typing " latex-like " when in class or a meeting ?
To your question then answer yourself what is the obsession of having blackboards in conference rooms if they have projectors ?
To me , it 's easy interaction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just can't understand why Microsoft seems so obsessed with the idea that everybody's going to want to interact with a computer using a pen.Perhaps because like me, I find very hard to draw diagrams, and equations with my fingers or typing "latex-like" when in class or a meeting?
To your question then answer yourself what is the obsession of having blackboards in conference rooms if they have projectors?
To me, it's easy interaction.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377228</id>
	<title>While it's still just vaporware at this point . .</title>
	<author>Cyberllama</author>
	<datestamp>1267794480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There certainly is more innovation in the concept than in the iPad -- by a fairly large margin.  That doesn't necessarily mean it would be more useful or useable -- but it's enough that iIm very interested to hear more about it.  The leaked video from a few months ago was really quite interesting, the only thing we need now is actual details on the operating system, spec, etc.  As a concept it's great, but as a reality it might fall short.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There certainly is more innovation in the concept than in the iPad -- by a fairly large margin .
That does n't necessarily mean it would be more useful or useable -- but it 's enough that iIm very interested to hear more about it .
The leaked video from a few months ago was really quite interesting , the only thing we need now is actual details on the operating system , spec , etc .
As a concept it 's great , but as a reality it might fall short .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There certainly is more innovation in the concept than in the iPad -- by a fairly large margin.
That doesn't necessarily mean it would be more useful or useable -- but it's enough that iIm very interested to hear more about it.
The leaked video from a few months ago was really quite interesting, the only thing we need now is actual details on the operating system, spec, etc.
As a concept it's great, but as a reality it might fall short.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376632</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to work.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267789680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe Microsoft will learn from those mistakes and put a fake horse's <i>ass</i> on this device.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe Microsoft will learn from those mistakes and put a fake horse 's ass on this device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe Microsoft will learn from those mistakes and put a fake horse's ass on this device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378558</id>
	<title>Re:Booklet?</title>
	<author>barzok</author>
	<datestamp>1267808340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except Windows usually <i>causes</i> leaks, instead of protecting against them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except Windows usually causes leaks , instead of protecting against them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except Windows usually causes leaks, instead of protecting against them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376982</id>
	<title>Re:Booklet?</title>
	<author>pitchpipe</author>
	<datestamp>1267792260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>MS's ability to name things has always be bad.</p></div><p>Maybe Microsoft's wit for naming things is rubbing off on Apple.  I mean really, iPad!?</p><p>Heh, Microsoft could say this is like an iPad, but with wings.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>MS 's ability to name things has always be bad.Maybe Microsoft 's wit for naming things is rubbing off on Apple .
I mean really , iPad !
? Heh , Microsoft could say this is like an iPad , but with wings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MS's ability to name things has always be bad.Maybe Microsoft's wit for naming things is rubbing off on Apple.
I mean really, iPad!
?Heh, Microsoft could say this is like an iPad, but with wings.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376912</id>
	<title>I'm Wary of Microsoft.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267791720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It looks like an nifty device, I will grant that. Nonetheless, I grow wary of buying anything from Microsoft these days. It seems like that company has become absolute artists at nickel and diming their customers. For instance, on the first Xbox, you could save guest profiles and, as long as one housemate had an Xbox Live membership, you could host those guests in games. Out comes the 360 and now you can no longer save guest profiles. You have to reset yours settings every damn login if you piggyback on your roomate's account. Then there are their operating systems. Granted, Windows 7 seems to have turned out alright. But they rushed Vista so bad they FUBARed the whole stupid thing and had to rerelease (and charge money for) an entire new OS to fix their screw ups. Again, they profit at the expense of their consumers. Their PC games (Games for Windows or whatever that PR tag is on PC game boxes now) have increasingly pain in the ass DRM. I don't even bother to buy the stupid things anymore because it is easier just to get a hack copy from the internet complete with DRM circumvention kits.
<br> <br>
As much as I love to blame all of my tech problems on Gates' legacy, I will admit that Microsoft turns out some top quality products from time to time. Their ergonomic keyboards are fantastic. This tablet looks impressive. I just find it hard to give my money to a company that is so skilled at financially raping their consumer base. Sorry MS, good products or not, you've burned my trust one too many times.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks like an nifty device , I will grant that .
Nonetheless , I grow wary of buying anything from Microsoft these days .
It seems like that company has become absolute artists at nickel and diming their customers .
For instance , on the first Xbox , you could save guest profiles and , as long as one housemate had an Xbox Live membership , you could host those guests in games .
Out comes the 360 and now you can no longer save guest profiles .
You have to reset yours settings every damn login if you piggyback on your roomate 's account .
Then there are their operating systems .
Granted , Windows 7 seems to have turned out alright .
But they rushed Vista so bad they FUBARed the whole stupid thing and had to rerelease ( and charge money for ) an entire new OS to fix their screw ups .
Again , they profit at the expense of their consumers .
Their PC games ( Games for Windows or whatever that PR tag is on PC game boxes now ) have increasingly pain in the ass DRM .
I do n't even bother to buy the stupid things anymore because it is easier just to get a hack copy from the internet complete with DRM circumvention kits .
As much as I love to blame all of my tech problems on Gates ' legacy , I will admit that Microsoft turns out some top quality products from time to time .
Their ergonomic keyboards are fantastic .
This tablet looks impressive .
I just find it hard to give my money to a company that is so skilled at financially raping their consumer base .
Sorry MS , good products or not , you 've burned my trust one too many times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks like an nifty device, I will grant that.
Nonetheless, I grow wary of buying anything from Microsoft these days.
It seems like that company has become absolute artists at nickel and diming their customers.
For instance, on the first Xbox, you could save guest profiles and, as long as one housemate had an Xbox Live membership, you could host those guests in games.
Out comes the 360 and now you can no longer save guest profiles.
You have to reset yours settings every damn login if you piggyback on your roomate's account.
Then there are their operating systems.
Granted, Windows 7 seems to have turned out alright.
But they rushed Vista so bad they FUBARed the whole stupid thing and had to rerelease (and charge money for) an entire new OS to fix their screw ups.
Again, they profit at the expense of their consumers.
Their PC games (Games for Windows or whatever that PR tag is on PC game boxes now) have increasingly pain in the ass DRM.
I don't even bother to buy the stupid things anymore because it is easier just to get a hack copy from the internet complete with DRM circumvention kits.
As much as I love to blame all of my tech problems on Gates' legacy, I will admit that Microsoft turns out some top quality products from time to time.
Their ergonomic keyboards are fantastic.
This tablet looks impressive.
I just find it hard to give my money to a company that is so skilled at financially raping their consumer base.
Sorry MS, good products or not, you've burned my trust one too many times.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378062</id>
	<title>These are not pictures or a prototype</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267803240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you look, there is no "there" there.  As in, nothing physical is being shown at any time.  These are not prototypes - they are concepts!  They aren't even as real at this stage as the fantasy cars you see at car shows.</p><p>So let's see what comes out and WHEN it comes out.   Remember that not even Windows Mobile 7 Edition comes out until the end of the year, and it's a lot less ambitious!</p><p>Some of the ideas are really interesting, but how much will we see in real life and how practical will it be to use.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you look , there is no " there " there .
As in , nothing physical is being shown at any time .
These are not prototypes - they are concepts !
They are n't even as real at this stage as the fantasy cars you see at car shows.So let 's see what comes out and WHEN it comes out .
Remember that not even Windows Mobile 7 Edition comes out until the end of the year , and it 's a lot less ambitious ! Some of the ideas are really interesting , but how much will we see in real life and how practical will it be to use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you look, there is no "there" there.
As in, nothing physical is being shown at any time.
These are not prototypes - they are concepts!
They aren't even as real at this stage as the fantasy cars you see at car shows.So let's see what comes out and WHEN it comes out.
Remember that not even Windows Mobile 7 Edition comes out until the end of the year, and it's a lot less ambitious!Some of the ideas are really interesting, but how much will we see in real life and how practical will it be to use.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376712</id>
	<title>Re:Booklet?</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1267790220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>By the time this moves from prototype to release, "Booklet" will seem like the soul of wit.<br> <br>

"Microsoft Booklet Live Mobility Series Professional Edition" rolls off only the nimblest of tongues...</htmltext>
<tokenext>By the time this moves from prototype to release , " Booklet " will seem like the soul of wit .
" Microsoft Booklet Live Mobility Series Professional Edition " rolls off only the nimblest of tongues.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By the time this moves from prototype to release, "Booklet" will seem like the soul of wit.
"Microsoft Booklet Live Mobility Series Professional Edition" rolls off only the nimblest of tongues...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378192</id>
	<title>Re:This is very cool.</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1267804620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I think this device looks very cool, and it solves the iPad/iPod Touch conundrum. The iPad has a nice screen for reading, but you actually read the ipod touch because it fits in your pocket. If I could have the screen of an iPad and put it in my pocket you've got a killer app there.</p></div><p>I own an iPod Touch, and I love it - but I agree with you in that such a conundrum exists. The Touch's size is perfect for about 90\% of what I use it for. When it comes to, say, a remote VNC and/or SSH session, though, even with pinch/zoom the screen is just too tiny. Based on my experience with the Touch I'm sure the iPad will be great and extremely useful - but do I want to be tying up a hand whenever I'm out and about with the device?</p><p>However having used Microsoft's "tablet optimized" OSes in the past, I have a hard time seeing them offer an OS that will truly work the way I want. I expect it to have hints of doing what I want; but with numerous Microsoft-y weirdness that will drive me bonkers. If you (you the reader, not you the parent post) are a happy Windows user, you aren't going to understand that statement - and you may very well end up really liking this device. But if you're not a Windows user, or if you are but occasionally find yourself swearing at your computer... you likely understand my point.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this device looks very cool , and it solves the iPad/iPod Touch conundrum .
The iPad has a nice screen for reading , but you actually read the ipod touch because it fits in your pocket .
If I could have the screen of an iPad and put it in my pocket you 've got a killer app there.I own an iPod Touch , and I love it - but I agree with you in that such a conundrum exists .
The Touch 's size is perfect for about 90 \ % of what I use it for .
When it comes to , say , a remote VNC and/or SSH session , though , even with pinch/zoom the screen is just too tiny .
Based on my experience with the Touch I 'm sure the iPad will be great and extremely useful - but do I want to be tying up a hand whenever I 'm out and about with the device ? However having used Microsoft 's " tablet optimized " OSes in the past , I have a hard time seeing them offer an OS that will truly work the way I want .
I expect it to have hints of doing what I want ; but with numerous Microsoft-y weirdness that will drive me bonkers .
If you ( you the reader , not you the parent post ) are a happy Windows user , you are n't going to understand that statement - and you may very well end up really liking this device .
But if you 're not a Windows user , or if you are but occasionally find yourself swearing at your computer... you likely understand my point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this device looks very cool, and it solves the iPad/iPod Touch conundrum.
The iPad has a nice screen for reading, but you actually read the ipod touch because it fits in your pocket.
If I could have the screen of an iPad and put it in my pocket you've got a killer app there.I own an iPod Touch, and I love it - but I agree with you in that such a conundrum exists.
The Touch's size is perfect for about 90\% of what I use it for.
When it comes to, say, a remote VNC and/or SSH session, though, even with pinch/zoom the screen is just too tiny.
Based on my experience with the Touch I'm sure the iPad will be great and extremely useful - but do I want to be tying up a hand whenever I'm out and about with the device?However having used Microsoft's "tablet optimized" OSes in the past, I have a hard time seeing them offer an OS that will truly work the way I want.
I expect it to have hints of doing what I want; but with numerous Microsoft-y weirdness that will drive me bonkers.
If you (you the reader, not you the parent post) are a happy Windows user, you aren't going to understand that statement - and you may very well end up really liking this device.
But if you're not a Windows user, or if you are but occasionally find yourself swearing at your computer... you likely understand my point.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378492</id>
	<title>Re:Booklet?</title>
	<author>daveime</author>
	<datestamp>1267807440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So that means I can go Skydiving, Rock Climbing, Horse Riding etc if I wear it ? I just hope they've fixed all the "leaks" ewww<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So that means I can go Skydiving , Rock Climbing , Horse Riding etc if I wear it ?
I just hope they 've fixed all the " leaks " ewww .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So that means I can go Skydiving, Rock Climbing, Horse Riding etc if I wear it ?
I just hope they've fixed all the "leaks" ewww ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376860</id>
	<title>Where's the beef??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267791300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The video is entirely CGI (fake) and reveals nothing more than what M$ already revealed months ago. Yet it still presents only about 25\% of what's needed for a complete, viable UI.</p><p>Even the narrator sounds computer generated, due to her lisp. If you really want to communicate, don't make people strain to undertstand through a lisp.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The video is entirely CGI ( fake ) and reveals nothing more than what M $ already revealed months ago .
Yet it still presents only about 25 \ % of what 's needed for a complete , viable UI.Even the narrator sounds computer generated , due to her lisp .
If you really want to communicate , do n't make people strain to undertstand through a lisp .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The video is entirely CGI (fake) and reveals nothing more than what M$ already revealed months ago.
Yet it still presents only about 25\% of what's needed for a complete, viable UI.Even the narrator sounds computer generated, due to her lisp.
If you really want to communicate, don't make people strain to undertstand through a lisp.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378146</id>
	<title>Re:Microsoft or Nintendo</title>
	<author>cbhacking</author>
	<datestamp>1267804200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't have a DS, but I wasn't under the impression that it has Flash support in web browsing (Flash 10 already exists for Tegra 2, and lots of WinCE-based devices have had Flash capability). That alone is a big plus.</p><p>The screens on the DS are *tiny* compared to this. Sure, you mentioned "bigger", but we're talking about several times as much space. DS screens are what, 3" diagonal? This thing has 7" screens, which is more than 4x as much space (assuming similar aspect ratio). You can actually read a book, of view a full web page, in something like this. Can you honestly imagine trying to put together an actual presentation - the kind of thing you might project on a screen at a business meeting - on the screens of a DS? I can't... yet that is one of the capabilities the Courier specifically highlights.</p><p>Multi-touch would be very nice. The DS has many more hardware buttons, which have some real advantages, but also have serious disadvantages. They take up more space that could be devoted to display, make the chassis bulkier, are probably more likely to fail in some way (moving parts and all that), and enforce requirements on how you hold the device. With multi-touch, you can have gestures that provide all the same kind of actions - zooming, scrolling, switching interface modes (search, applicaiton switch, that nifty graphical display of your web page favorites, etc.), and of course anything application-specific that a developer might want to implement (see the iPhone and some of the apps coming out for the ZuneHD).</p><p>Frankly, cool though the inductive charging would be, that seems the least exciting of the capabilities of this new device. This is the Internet in your pocket, replaces (paper) notebooks and journals, would be perfect for reading books or news, and could conceivably do much, much more (damn near every MS computer-like device, including the classic non-HD Zunes, support third-party software... there's lot sof room on that Apps screen for some really cool stuff).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't have a DS , but I was n't under the impression that it has Flash support in web browsing ( Flash 10 already exists for Tegra 2 , and lots of WinCE-based devices have had Flash capability ) .
That alone is a big plus.The screens on the DS are * tiny * compared to this .
Sure , you mentioned " bigger " , but we 're talking about several times as much space .
DS screens are what , 3 " diagonal ?
This thing has 7 " screens , which is more than 4x as much space ( assuming similar aspect ratio ) .
You can actually read a book , of view a full web page , in something like this .
Can you honestly imagine trying to put together an actual presentation - the kind of thing you might project on a screen at a business meeting - on the screens of a DS ?
I ca n't... yet that is one of the capabilities the Courier specifically highlights.Multi-touch would be very nice .
The DS has many more hardware buttons , which have some real advantages , but also have serious disadvantages .
They take up more space that could be devoted to display , make the chassis bulkier , are probably more likely to fail in some way ( moving parts and all that ) , and enforce requirements on how you hold the device .
With multi-touch , you can have gestures that provide all the same kind of actions - zooming , scrolling , switching interface modes ( search , applicaiton switch , that nifty graphical display of your web page favorites , etc .
) , and of course anything application-specific that a developer might want to implement ( see the iPhone and some of the apps coming out for the ZuneHD ) .Frankly , cool though the inductive charging would be , that seems the least exciting of the capabilities of this new device .
This is the Internet in your pocket , replaces ( paper ) notebooks and journals , would be perfect for reading books or news , and could conceivably do much , much more ( damn near every MS computer-like device , including the classic non-HD Zunes , support third-party software... there 's lot sof room on that Apps screen for some really cool stuff ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't have a DS, but I wasn't under the impression that it has Flash support in web browsing (Flash 10 already exists for Tegra 2, and lots of WinCE-based devices have had Flash capability).
That alone is a big plus.The screens on the DS are *tiny* compared to this.
Sure, you mentioned "bigger", but we're talking about several times as much space.
DS screens are what, 3" diagonal?
This thing has 7" screens, which is more than 4x as much space (assuming similar aspect ratio).
You can actually read a book, of view a full web page, in something like this.
Can you honestly imagine trying to put together an actual presentation - the kind of thing you might project on a screen at a business meeting - on the screens of a DS?
I can't... yet that is one of the capabilities the Courier specifically highlights.Multi-touch would be very nice.
The DS has many more hardware buttons, which have some real advantages, but also have serious disadvantages.
They take up more space that could be devoted to display, make the chassis bulkier, are probably more likely to fail in some way (moving parts and all that), and enforce requirements on how you hold the device.
With multi-touch, you can have gestures that provide all the same kind of actions - zooming, scrolling, switching interface modes (search, applicaiton switch, that nifty graphical display of your web page favorites, etc.
), and of course anything application-specific that a developer might want to implement (see the iPhone and some of the apps coming out for the ZuneHD).Frankly, cool though the inductive charging would be, that seems the least exciting of the capabilities of this new device.
This is the Internet in your pocket, replaces (paper) notebooks and journals, would be perfect for reading books or news, and could conceivably do much, much more (damn near every MS computer-like device, including the classic non-HD Zunes, support third-party software... there's lot sof room on that Apps screen for some really cool stuff).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376714</id>
	<title>Re:yes,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267790280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>seriously, if they made it with linux I'd buy it today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>seriously , if they made it with linux I 'd buy it today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>seriously, if they made it with linux I'd buy it today.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376796</id>
	<title>"Me too" maybe, Vapo(u)rware definitely.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267790880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When Microsoft says "late prototype" I read it as "we've got nothing, really, but if we say we're about to release something, a non-zero percentage of the market will sit on their thumbs until we do, instead of buying actual products that are actually available from other sources, because by golly, we're Microsoft."</p><p>(Yes, I know, it actually works.  And no, I don't think that's a very nice tactic.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When Microsoft says " late prototype " I read it as " we 've got nothing , really , but if we say we 're about to release something , a non-zero percentage of the market will sit on their thumbs until we do , instead of buying actual products that are actually available from other sources , because by golly , we 're Microsoft .
" ( Yes , I know , it actually works .
And no , I do n't think that 's a very nice tactic .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When Microsoft says "late prototype" I read it as "we've got nothing, really, but if we say we're about to release something, a non-zero percentage of the market will sit on their thumbs until we do, instead of buying actual products that are actually available from other sources, because by golly, we're Microsoft.
"(Yes, I know, it actually works.
And no, I don't think that's a very nice tactic.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377236</id>
	<title>Re:Booklet?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267794540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What's wrong with booklet though?</p></div><p>Well, for starters it might be tough to get a trademark on the term "booklet". The term "booklet" is too generic and not distinctive enough that people would associate it with only the Microsoft product of the same name; iPad is a distinctive trademarked term whereas "booklet" is not.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's wrong with booklet though ? Well , for starters it might be tough to get a trademark on the term " booklet " .
The term " booklet " is too generic and not distinctive enough that people would associate it with only the Microsoft product of the same name ; iPad is a distinctive trademarked term whereas " booklet " is not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's wrong with booklet though?Well, for starters it might be tough to get a trademark on the term "booklet".
The term "booklet" is too generic and not distinctive enough that people would associate it with only the Microsoft product of the same name; iPad is a distinctive trademarked term whereas "booklet" is not.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377186</id>
	<title>Re:Until I can buy one</title>
	<author>peragrin</author>
	<datestamp>1267794060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MSFT has been doing tablets for almost a decade. however it took apple to design a smart phone with a tablet interface.</p><p>the ipad will blow away windows based tablets because you can't take a desktop GUI and shove it onto a tablet and call it a tablet OS.  it is something that no one else seems willing to fully do  but apple.</p><p>It will take MSFt 3 years to duplicate the iphones major interface elements for touch screens.  MSFt spends $9 billion in R&amp;D and they get crap for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MSFT has been doing tablets for almost a decade .
however it took apple to design a smart phone with a tablet interface.the ipad will blow away windows based tablets because you ca n't take a desktop GUI and shove it onto a tablet and call it a tablet OS .
it is something that no one else seems willing to fully do but apple.It will take MSFt 3 years to duplicate the iphones major interface elements for touch screens .
MSFt spends $ 9 billion in R&amp;D and they get crap for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MSFT has been doing tablets for almost a decade.
however it took apple to design a smart phone with a tablet interface.the ipad will blow away windows based tablets because you can't take a desktop GUI and shove it onto a tablet and call it a tablet OS.
it is something that no one else seems willing to fully do  but apple.It will take MSFt 3 years to duplicate the iphones major interface elements for touch screens.
MSFt spends $9 billion in R&amp;D and they get crap for it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377586</id>
	<title>Bad Idea...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267798620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; What if I want a Comic Sans?</p><p>You'll get attacked by typographers and damned to Helvetica.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; What if I want a Comic Sans ? You 'll get attacked by typographers and damned to Helvetica .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; What if I want a Comic Sans?You'll get attacked by typographers and damned to Helvetica.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31380380</id>
	<title>surprising from microsoft</title>
	<author>cfriedt</author>
	<datestamp>1267887480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This could actually be somewhat useful.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This could actually be somewhat useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This could actually be somewhat useful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31379074</id>
	<title>Re:That's right, because handwriting on screens ru</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267815300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a college student, I can attest that being able to take and save notes electronically would be *very* nice.</p><p>Try making, say, a free-body diagram as quickly with your keyboard and mouse as with a stylus and touchscreen (or, more importantly, as quickly as the lecturer).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a college student , I can attest that being able to take and save notes electronically would be * very * nice.Try making , say , a free-body diagram as quickly with your keyboard and mouse as with a stylus and touchscreen ( or , more importantly , as quickly as the lecturer ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a college student, I can attest that being able to take and save notes electronically would be *very* nice.Try making, say, a free-body diagram as quickly with your keyboard and mouse as with a stylus and touchscreen (or, more importantly, as quickly as the lecturer).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376552</id>
	<title>Pre?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267789260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> an inductive pad, like the Palm Touchstone charging dock for Pre.</p></div><p>It's a bad sign that the Palm Pre comparisons have already started.  If this thing winds up being to the iPad what the Pre is to the iPhone, it's already dead.  It will have great promise and hope that will be dashed as soon as you try to use the thing.  Sort of like a Democratic majority in Congress....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>an inductive pad , like the Palm Touchstone charging dock for Pre.It 's a bad sign that the Palm Pre comparisons have already started .
If this thing winds up being to the iPad what the Pre is to the iPhone , it 's already dead .
It will have great promise and hope that will be dashed as soon as you try to use the thing .
Sort of like a Democratic majority in Congress... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> an inductive pad, like the Palm Touchstone charging dock for Pre.It's a bad sign that the Palm Pre comparisons have already started.
If this thing winds up being to the iPad what the Pre is to the iPhone, it's already dead.
It will have great promise and hope that will be dashed as soon as you try to use the thing.
Sort of like a Democratic majority in Congress....
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31380176</id>
	<title>Re:"Me too" maybe, Vapo(u)rware definitely.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267884720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's what they made with Windows 3.11. It worked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what they made with Windows 3.11 .
It worked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what they made with Windows 3.11.
It worked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376858</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong link</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267791300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would consider a Courier except for the fact that it won't support email as standard. According to the article Microsoft have decided that email is outmoded and won't be supported on their new device except as a legacy add on for 'last generation' computer users. In fact Bill Gates is quoted as saying  "in Courier, email is only for old people."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would consider a Courier except for the fact that it wo n't support email as standard .
According to the article Microsoft have decided that email is outmoded and wo n't be supported on their new device except as a legacy add on for 'last generation ' computer users .
In fact Bill Gates is quoted as saying " in Courier , email is only for old people .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would consider a Courier except for the fact that it won't support email as standard.
According to the article Microsoft have decided that email is outmoded and won't be supported on their new device except as a legacy add on for 'last generation' computer users.
In fact Bill Gates is quoted as saying  "in Courier, email is only for old people.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377366</id>
	<title>Re:That's right, because handwriting on screens ru</title>
	<author>edumacator</author>
	<datestamp>1267795860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I get your point, and it's a good one, I do think you are oversimplifying the input capacity. This is about marketing, so they would show the most "innovative" features that would provide the Wow! factor. I'm hoping they would actually include the capacity for an onscreen keyboard and they just aren't showing it.</p><p>Even still, I can think of a lot of situations where this would be a good tool. Keyboards aren't always easy for drawing pictures...or things like that, so there is a place for that type of input. Also, there are times when standing, or sitting in a theater would make balancing the device, so I can type with two hands would be somewhat cumbersome.</p><p>I wouldn't put it passed MS to mess this up, but it isn't a done deal. The fact is, there is a lot of room in modern computing for all different types of input methods.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I get your point , and it 's a good one , I do think you are oversimplifying the input capacity .
This is about marketing , so they would show the most " innovative " features that would provide the Wow !
factor. I 'm hoping they would actually include the capacity for an onscreen keyboard and they just are n't showing it.Even still , I can think of a lot of situations where this would be a good tool .
Keyboards are n't always easy for drawing pictures...or things like that , so there is a place for that type of input .
Also , there are times when standing , or sitting in a theater would make balancing the device , so I can type with two hands would be somewhat cumbersome.I would n't put it passed MS to mess this up , but it is n't a done deal .
The fact is , there is a lot of room in modern computing for all different types of input methods .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I get your point, and it's a good one, I do think you are oversimplifying the input capacity.
This is about marketing, so they would show the most "innovative" features that would provide the Wow!
factor. I'm hoping they would actually include the capacity for an onscreen keyboard and they just aren't showing it.Even still, I can think of a lot of situations where this would be a good tool.
Keyboards aren't always easy for drawing pictures...or things like that, so there is a place for that type of input.
Also, there are times when standing, or sitting in a theater would make balancing the device, so I can type with two hands would be somewhat cumbersome.I wouldn't put it passed MS to mess this up, but it isn't a done deal.
The fact is, there is a lot of room in modern computing for all different types of input methods.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376924</id>
	<title>Re:Correct Links</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267791780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>ohnoitsroland</htmltext>
<tokenext>ohnoitsroland</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ohnoitsroland</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377030</id>
	<title>Ya I'm not seeing this</title>
	<author>Sycraft-fu</author>
	<datestamp>1267792740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like the iPad, it seems to me to be a device in search of a market that doesn't exist. I just don't see the need/demand for something like a laptop, but not a laptop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like the iPad , it seems to me to be a device in search of a market that does n't exist .
I just do n't see the need/demand for something like a laptop , but not a laptop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like the iPad, it seems to me to be a device in search of a market that doesn't exist.
I just don't see the need/demand for something like a laptop, but not a laptop.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724</id>
	<title>That's right, because handwriting on screens rules</title>
	<author>PCM2</author>
	<datestamp>1267790400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Watching the demo, I just can't understand why Microsoft seems so obsessed with the idea that everybody's going to want to interact with a computer using a pen.</p><p>Think about it. Let's say you're collaborating on a project with somebody, and he's done a lot of brainstorming about it. He comes to a meeting with a stack of notebooks where he's written down all his ideas. What's the first thing he says? "Sorry about my handwriting."</p><p>Even I apologize for my handwriting, and I have the handwriting of a comic-book letterer -- when I want to. The thing is, writing neatly takes a lot of time. It's much faster to use upper and lower case than block capitals, for starters, and it's faster to use cursive than printing. And even faster than that to just scrawl it out any way you can.</p><p>But you know what's even faster than that? <i>Typing on a computer keyboard.</i> </p><p>Microsoft first got on this kick with OneNote, its note-taking application, which it seemed to want to market as the killer app for tablet PCs. And by that I mean the <i>first generation</i> of tablet PCs. You know the ones. You didn't buy one. For some reason, Microsoft was pushing really hard for this idea that everybody would be walking around with tablet PCs, scribbling notes into OneNote with pens.</p><p>Now, I use OneNote every day. But while I have a nice-sized Wacom tablet sitting right here on my desk, which comes with a very nice, contoured stylus that fits very nicely in my hand, never once have I been inspired to plug the thing in to scrawl off some notes in OneNote. Not when there's a keyboard sitting right in front of me. Not when I know that if I simply type in my thoughts, OneNote won't have to try to OCR my scrawls in order to make the text searchable. Not when I know that storing a bitmap to save a six-word thought is a waste of space.</p><p>So in this Courier demo we not only have someone scribbling notes on a notepad -- which conveniently resembles an onscreen Moleskine notebook, because everybody knows people like their computers to model real-life things that are less efficient than computers, even when the computer doesn't much resemble that real-life thing -- but at one point the person draws a box around those notes, taps on it and the box turns into<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... a highlighted yellow version of that wobbly, hand-drawn box.</p><p>That might be all well and good if I was a bright-eyed fresh college grad like the eager woman in the demo, and my life was accompanied by a wistful accoustic indie-rock soundtrack. But in real life, if I was being jostled back and forth on the noisy subway on my way home and I drew that box and it popped up on my screen looking all fucked-up like I just drew it, the first thing that would cross my mind would be, "God dammit, why is this computer so stupid that it can't tell I was trying to draw a box just now? Why won't it just make a rectangle? Drawing boxes was so much fucking easier when all I had to do is click my mouse button, hold it and drag."</p><p>This UI goes beyond a solution looking for a problem. It's a way of actively making it harder for me to get work done with a computer.</p><p>It reminds me of all the VRML hype from years back. People were predicting that in the future, we wouldn't type URLs into a Web browser. We'd fire up our Avatars and fly to places on the Web in 3-D graphics. We would walk through virtual libraries, pulling electronic books off 3-D shelves. We'd ride dragons to meeting rooms where we'd chat with other avatars in real time. And all I could think was, "WTF? So we've just invented the Internet, this miraculous thing that puts the world of information right at your fingertips, no matter where you are, so that all you have to do is type a couple things and the information instantly appears on your screen... and you want to impose a 3-D spatial paradigm on it? Instead of calling up information out of thin air, you want to have to <i>hike down the virtual block to get it</i>? You call that progress?"</p><p>Same thing with this tablet idea. People are too stu</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Watching the demo , I just ca n't understand why Microsoft seems so obsessed with the idea that everybody 's going to want to interact with a computer using a pen.Think about it .
Let 's say you 're collaborating on a project with somebody , and he 's done a lot of brainstorming about it .
He comes to a meeting with a stack of notebooks where he 's written down all his ideas .
What 's the first thing he says ?
" Sorry about my handwriting .
" Even I apologize for my handwriting , and I have the handwriting of a comic-book letterer -- when I want to .
The thing is , writing neatly takes a lot of time .
It 's much faster to use upper and lower case than block capitals , for starters , and it 's faster to use cursive than printing .
And even faster than that to just scrawl it out any way you can.But you know what 's even faster than that ?
Typing on a computer keyboard .
Microsoft first got on this kick with OneNote , its note-taking application , which it seemed to want to market as the killer app for tablet PCs .
And by that I mean the first generation of tablet PCs .
You know the ones .
You did n't buy one .
For some reason , Microsoft was pushing really hard for this idea that everybody would be walking around with tablet PCs , scribbling notes into OneNote with pens.Now , I use OneNote every day .
But while I have a nice-sized Wacom tablet sitting right here on my desk , which comes with a very nice , contoured stylus that fits very nicely in my hand , never once have I been inspired to plug the thing in to scrawl off some notes in OneNote .
Not when there 's a keyboard sitting right in front of me .
Not when I know that if I simply type in my thoughts , OneNote wo n't have to try to OCR my scrawls in order to make the text searchable .
Not when I know that storing a bitmap to save a six-word thought is a waste of space.So in this Courier demo we not only have someone scribbling notes on a notepad -- which conveniently resembles an onscreen Moleskine notebook , because everybody knows people like their computers to model real-life things that are less efficient than computers , even when the computer does n't much resemble that real-life thing -- but at one point the person draws a box around those notes , taps on it and the box turns into ... a highlighted yellow version of that wobbly , hand-drawn box.That might be all well and good if I was a bright-eyed fresh college grad like the eager woman in the demo , and my life was accompanied by a wistful accoustic indie-rock soundtrack .
But in real life , if I was being jostled back and forth on the noisy subway on my way home and I drew that box and it popped up on my screen looking all fucked-up like I just drew it , the first thing that would cross my mind would be , " God dammit , why is this computer so stupid that it ca n't tell I was trying to draw a box just now ?
Why wo n't it just make a rectangle ?
Drawing boxes was so much fucking easier when all I had to do is click my mouse button , hold it and drag .
" This UI goes beyond a solution looking for a problem .
It 's a way of actively making it harder for me to get work done with a computer.It reminds me of all the VRML hype from years back .
People were predicting that in the future , we would n't type URLs into a Web browser .
We 'd fire up our Avatars and fly to places on the Web in 3-D graphics .
We would walk through virtual libraries , pulling electronic books off 3-D shelves .
We 'd ride dragons to meeting rooms where we 'd chat with other avatars in real time .
And all I could think was , " WTF ?
So we 've just invented the Internet , this miraculous thing that puts the world of information right at your fingertips , no matter where you are , so that all you have to do is type a couple things and the information instantly appears on your screen... and you want to impose a 3-D spatial paradigm on it ?
Instead of calling up information out of thin air , you want to have to hike down the virtual block to get it ?
You call that progress ?
" Same thing with this tablet idea .
People are too stu</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Watching the demo, I just can't understand why Microsoft seems so obsessed with the idea that everybody's going to want to interact with a computer using a pen.Think about it.
Let's say you're collaborating on a project with somebody, and he's done a lot of brainstorming about it.
He comes to a meeting with a stack of notebooks where he's written down all his ideas.
What's the first thing he says?
"Sorry about my handwriting.
"Even I apologize for my handwriting, and I have the handwriting of a comic-book letterer -- when I want to.
The thing is, writing neatly takes a lot of time.
It's much faster to use upper and lower case than block capitals, for starters, and it's faster to use cursive than printing.
And even faster than that to just scrawl it out any way you can.But you know what's even faster than that?
Typing on a computer keyboard.
Microsoft first got on this kick with OneNote, its note-taking application, which it seemed to want to market as the killer app for tablet PCs.
And by that I mean the first generation of tablet PCs.
You know the ones.
You didn't buy one.
For some reason, Microsoft was pushing really hard for this idea that everybody would be walking around with tablet PCs, scribbling notes into OneNote with pens.Now, I use OneNote every day.
But while I have a nice-sized Wacom tablet sitting right here on my desk, which comes with a very nice, contoured stylus that fits very nicely in my hand, never once have I been inspired to plug the thing in to scrawl off some notes in OneNote.
Not when there's a keyboard sitting right in front of me.
Not when I know that if I simply type in my thoughts, OneNote won't have to try to OCR my scrawls in order to make the text searchable.
Not when I know that storing a bitmap to save a six-word thought is a waste of space.So in this Courier demo we not only have someone scribbling notes on a notepad -- which conveniently resembles an onscreen Moleskine notebook, because everybody knows people like their computers to model real-life things that are less efficient than computers, even when the computer doesn't much resemble that real-life thing -- but at one point the person draws a box around those notes, taps on it and the box turns into ... a highlighted yellow version of that wobbly, hand-drawn box.That might be all well and good if I was a bright-eyed fresh college grad like the eager woman in the demo, and my life was accompanied by a wistful accoustic indie-rock soundtrack.
But in real life, if I was being jostled back and forth on the noisy subway on my way home and I drew that box and it popped up on my screen looking all fucked-up like I just drew it, the first thing that would cross my mind would be, "God dammit, why is this computer so stupid that it can't tell I was trying to draw a box just now?
Why won't it just make a rectangle?
Drawing boxes was so much fucking easier when all I had to do is click my mouse button, hold it and drag.
"This UI goes beyond a solution looking for a problem.
It's a way of actively making it harder for me to get work done with a computer.It reminds me of all the VRML hype from years back.
People were predicting that in the future, we wouldn't type URLs into a Web browser.
We'd fire up our Avatars and fly to places on the Web in 3-D graphics.
We would walk through virtual libraries, pulling electronic books off 3-D shelves.
We'd ride dragons to meeting rooms where we'd chat with other avatars in real time.
And all I could think was, "WTF?
So we've just invented the Internet, this miraculous thing that puts the world of information right at your fingertips, no matter where you are, so that all you have to do is type a couple things and the information instantly appears on your screen... and you want to impose a 3-D spatial paradigm on it?
Instead of calling up information out of thin air, you want to have to hike down the virtual block to get it?
You call that progress?
"Same thing with this tablet idea.
People are too stu</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377254</id>
	<title>Re:That's right, because handwriting on screens ru</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1267794720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This UI goes beyond a solution looking for a problem. It's a way of actively making it harder for me to get work done with a computer.</p></div><p>Yes. This will make most tasks people perform primarily on a desktop/laptop computer more difficult and/or less efficient. However, for those millions of us that find ourselves frequently away from our laptops/desktops, the Courier would seem to provide a great deal of functionality as a simple web browser, notepad, personal calendar, and organizer - but with infinite paper. Basement dwellers need not apply - you'll always have your keyboard within arms reach.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This UI goes beyond a solution looking for a problem .
It 's a way of actively making it harder for me to get work done with a computer.Yes .
This will make most tasks people perform primarily on a desktop/laptop computer more difficult and/or less efficient .
However , for those millions of us that find ourselves frequently away from our laptops/desktops , the Courier would seem to provide a great deal of functionality as a simple web browser , notepad , personal calendar , and organizer - but with infinite paper .
Basement dwellers need not apply - you 'll always have your keyboard within arms reach .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This UI goes beyond a solution looking for a problem.
It's a way of actively making it harder for me to get work done with a computer.Yes.
This will make most tasks people perform primarily on a desktop/laptop computer more difficult and/or less efficient.
However, for those millions of us that find ourselves frequently away from our laptops/desktops, the Courier would seem to provide a great deal of functionality as a simple web browser, notepad, personal calendar, and organizer - but with infinite paper.
Basement dwellers need not apply - you'll always have your keyboard within arms reach.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376760</id>
	<title>This is very cool.</title>
	<author>tthomas48</author>
	<datestamp>1267790640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think this device looks very cool, and it solves the iPad/iPod Touch conundrum. The iPad has a nice screen for reading, but you actually read the ipod touch because it fits in your pocket. If I could have the screen of an iPad and put it in my pocket you've got a killer app there.</p><p>And before your criticize the "put in your pocket" thing, I get that as the killer feature the ipod touch has from two moms who both use their ipods constantly. The ipad is not so convenient for taking a load of laundry out to the laundry room and checking facebook status updates.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this device looks very cool , and it solves the iPad/iPod Touch conundrum .
The iPad has a nice screen for reading , but you actually read the ipod touch because it fits in your pocket .
If I could have the screen of an iPad and put it in my pocket you 've got a killer app there.And before your criticize the " put in your pocket " thing , I get that as the killer feature the ipod touch has from two moms who both use their ipods constantly .
The ipad is not so convenient for taking a load of laundry out to the laundry room and checking facebook status updates .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this device looks very cool, and it solves the iPad/iPod Touch conundrum.
The iPad has a nice screen for reading, but you actually read the ipod touch because it fits in your pocket.
If I could have the screen of an iPad and put it in my pocket you've got a killer app there.And before your criticize the "put in your pocket" thing, I get that as the killer feature the ipod touch has from two moms who both use their ipods constantly.
The ipad is not so convenient for taking a load of laundry out to the laundry room and checking facebook status updates.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377044</id>
	<title>Re:That's right, because handwriting on screens ru</title>
	<author>fryjs</author>
	<datestamp>1267792860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why do you think that the courier is supposed to be used whilst sitting at your desk?  I don't know about you, but I frequently grab a notepad, and go to a location that is not my desk to sketch out ideas/concepts/etc.  I don't want to be using a keyboard for that, I want exactly the interface that the courier provides: a pen and surface to write on.  (Currently I have an iRex, but the extra features of the courier will have me buying one in a heartbeat)

Not every computing device must replace your desktop system, there are a myriad of situations where other interfaces are much more appropriate, and a myriad more where it can supplement other devices.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do you think that the courier is supposed to be used whilst sitting at your desk ?
I do n't know about you , but I frequently grab a notepad , and go to a location that is not my desk to sketch out ideas/concepts/etc .
I do n't want to be using a keyboard for that , I want exactly the interface that the courier provides : a pen and surface to write on .
( Currently I have an iRex , but the extra features of the courier will have me buying one in a heartbeat ) Not every computing device must replace your desktop system , there are a myriad of situations where other interfaces are much more appropriate , and a myriad more where it can supplement other devices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do you think that the courier is supposed to be used whilst sitting at your desk?
I don't know about you, but I frequently grab a notepad, and go to a location that is not my desk to sketch out ideas/concepts/etc.
I don't want to be using a keyboard for that, I want exactly the interface that the courier provides: a pen and surface to write on.
(Currently I have an iRex, but the extra features of the courier will have me buying one in a heartbeat)

Not every computing device must replace your desktop system, there are a myriad of situations where other interfaces are much more appropriate, and a myriad more where it can supplement other devices.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377868</id>
	<title>Re:Pre?</title>
	<author>Totenglocke</author>
	<datestamp>1267801200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It will have great promise and hope that will be dashed as soon as you try to use the thing. Sort of like a Democratic majority in Congress....</p></div><p>Flawed analogy - rational people actually expected the iPad to be useful before we found out the details.  I've yet to meet someone rational who actually expected anything worthwhile from a Democratic majority in Congress.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It will have great promise and hope that will be dashed as soon as you try to use the thing .
Sort of like a Democratic majority in Congress....Flawed analogy - rational people actually expected the iPad to be useful before we found out the details .
I 've yet to meet someone rational who actually expected anything worthwhile from a Democratic majority in Congress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will have great promise and hope that will be dashed as soon as you try to use the thing.
Sort of like a Democratic majority in Congress....Flawed analogy - rational people actually expected the iPad to be useful before we found out the details.
I've yet to meet someone rational who actually expected anything worthwhile from a Democratic majority in Congress.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377332</id>
	<title>Re:That's right, because handwriting on screens ru</title>
	<author>dhavleak</author>
	<datestamp>1267795500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Man.. what a long and pointless rant.

</p><p>Nobody says handwriting is better/faster. The articles / videos about Courier aren't portraying it to be the next evolution in input devices. It's just a different form factor, and a purpose-built device, and for that purpose the pen works better than a keyboard.

</p><p>Relax a bit...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Man.. what a long and pointless rant .
Nobody says handwriting is better/faster .
The articles / videos about Courier are n't portraying it to be the next evolution in input devices .
It 's just a different form factor , and a purpose-built device , and for that purpose the pen works better than a keyboard .
Relax a bit.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man.. what a long and pointless rant.
Nobody says handwriting is better/faster.
The articles / videos about Courier aren't portraying it to be the next evolution in input devices.
It's just a different form factor, and a purpose-built device, and for that purpose the pen works better than a keyboard.
Relax a bit...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378144</id>
	<title>Re:Two screens not better than one.</title>
	<author>mblase</author>
	<datestamp>1267804200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Breaking a screen into two smaller ones and sticking a giant hinge/bezel in the middle isn't an advantage.</p></div><p>Sure it is; it's the single best way to keep your screen from getting scratched, and it makes the device half as large and therefore more portable.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Think about watching video on this. You have half the screen and turned sideways.</p></div><p>Have you seen the screenshots? This thing isn't designed for consumers to watch video on like the iPad is; it's designed for successful businesspeople to carry into meetings and synchronize all their schedules and email via wi-fi.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Breaking a screen into two smaller ones and sticking a giant hinge/bezel in the middle is n't an advantage.Sure it is ; it 's the single best way to keep your screen from getting scratched , and it makes the device half as large and therefore more portable.Think about watching video on this .
You have half the screen and turned sideways.Have you seen the screenshots ?
This thing is n't designed for consumers to watch video on like the iPad is ; it 's designed for successful businesspeople to carry into meetings and synchronize all their schedules and email via wi-fi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Breaking a screen into two smaller ones and sticking a giant hinge/bezel in the middle isn't an advantage.Sure it is; it's the single best way to keep your screen from getting scratched, and it makes the device half as large and therefore more portable.Think about watching video on this.
You have half the screen and turned sideways.Have you seen the screenshots?
This thing isn't designed for consumers to watch video on like the iPad is; it's designed for successful businesspeople to carry into meetings and synchronize all their schedules and email via wi-fi.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376516</id>
	<title>Booklet?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1267789080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MS's ability to name things has always be bad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MS 's ability to name things has always be bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MS's ability to name things has always be bad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376726</id>
	<title>Analogy</title>
	<author>Waruwaru</author>
	<datestamp>1267790400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>iPad:iPod is Courier:NintendoDS</htmltext>
<tokenext>iPad : iPod is Courier : NintendoDS</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iPad:iPod is Courier:NintendoDS</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378102</id>
	<title>How many folding clipboards do you see?</title>
	<author>SuperKendall</author>
	<datestamp>1267803720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>because I could walk around holding the courier with one hand and writing stuff/accessing it with another</i></p><p>There is a design that works great for that.</p><p>It's called a clipboard.  And it's only one page, not two.   Can you imagine how hard that would really be to work, flopping all around as you attempt to hold it in one hand?</p><p><i>even if I'm wearing gloves?</i></p><p>Even when your wearing <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Tavo-TG002-BL-L-Playpoint-Technology-Touchpad/dp/B000LUBCAG" title="amazon.com">this</a> [amazon.com]?</p><p>Or if you have gloves you really love already, why not use one of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Ten-One-Design-Stylus-iPhone/dp/B00174N3R0" title="amazon.com">these</a> [amazon.com]?</p><p>Of course it would be a shame to fall back to a stylus because then five potential contact points become one ham-fisted stick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>because I could walk around holding the courier with one hand and writing stuff/accessing it with anotherThere is a design that works great for that.It 's called a clipboard .
And it 's only one page , not two .
Can you imagine how hard that would really be to work , flopping all around as you attempt to hold it in one hand ? even if I 'm wearing gloves ? Even when your wearing this [ amazon.com ] ? Or if you have gloves you really love already , why not use one of these [ amazon.com ] ? Of course it would be a shame to fall back to a stylus because then five potential contact points become one ham-fisted stick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because I could walk around holding the courier with one hand and writing stuff/accessing it with anotherThere is a design that works great for that.It's called a clipboard.
And it's only one page, not two.
Can you imagine how hard that would really be to work, flopping all around as you attempt to hold it in one hand?even if I'm wearing gloves?Even when your wearing this [amazon.com]?Or if you have gloves you really love already, why not use one of these [amazon.com]?Of course it would be a shame to fall back to a stylus because then five potential contact points become one ham-fisted stick.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376602</id>
	<title>yes,</title>
	<author>sadtrev</author>
	<datestamp>1267789560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but does it run Linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but does it run Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but does it run Linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376794</id>
	<title>M$, but I admit it's a good idea...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267790820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nintendo had.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nintendo had .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nintendo had.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376506</id>
	<title>This isn't going to work.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267789020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When automobiles were just invented, they had some designs that put a fake horse's head on the front of the car. This was supposed to calm down real horses and people that were on the road. I see this notebook? booklet? whatever? is designed to resemble a real book, but it doesn't have the advantages of a real book. It's gonna flop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When automobiles were just invented , they had some designs that put a fake horse 's head on the front of the car .
This was supposed to calm down real horses and people that were on the road .
I see this notebook ?
booklet ? whatever ?
is designed to resemble a real book , but it does n't have the advantages of a real book .
It 's gon na flop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When automobiles were just invented, they had some designs that put a fake horse's head on the front of the car.
This was supposed to calm down real horses and people that were on the road.
I see this notebook?
booklet? whatever?
is designed to resemble a real book, but it doesn't have the advantages of a real book.
It's gonna flop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377692</id>
	<title>If I'm not carrying a table around with me...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267799460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How am I supposed to hold this thing and do all the stuff in the videos without the spine hinge snapping after a month of use?</p><p>Pretty nifty otherwise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How am I supposed to hold this thing and do all the stuff in the videos without the spine hinge snapping after a month of use ? Pretty nifty otherwise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How am I supposed to hold this thing and do all the stuff in the videos without the spine hinge snapping after a month of use?Pretty nifty otherwise.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377198</id>
	<title>Re:That's right, because handwriting on screens ru</title>
	<author>Buelldozer</author>
	<datestamp>1267794180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And if I want to draw a picture? How do I accomplish that with my keyboard?</p><p>How about if I want to "do the math" on an equation where I need to go step by step? What then?</p><p>I understand what you're saying but the keyboard isn't the end all device for input. It's not even close to covering many things that people would like to do with their computers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And if I want to draw a picture ?
How do I accomplish that with my keyboard ? How about if I want to " do the math " on an equation where I need to go step by step ?
What then ? I understand what you 're saying but the keyboard is n't the end all device for input .
It 's not even close to covering many things that people would like to do with their computers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if I want to draw a picture?
How do I accomplish that with my keyboard?How about if I want to "do the math" on an equation where I need to go step by step?
What then?I understand what you're saying but the keyboard isn't the end all device for input.
It's not even close to covering many things that people would like to do with their computers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377900</id>
	<title>Re:That's right, because handwriting on screens ru</title>
	<author>am 2k</author>
	<datestamp>1267801620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But in real life, if I was being jostled back and forth on the noisy subway on my way home and I drew that box and it popped up on my screen looking all fucked-up like I just drew it, the first thing that would cross my mind would be, "God dammit, why is this computer so stupid that it can't tell I was trying to draw a box just now? Why won't it just make a rectangle? Drawing boxes was so much fucking easier when all I had to do is click my mouse button, hold it and drag."</p><p>This UI goes beyond a solution looking for a problem. It's a way of actively making it harder for me to get work done with a computer.</p></div><p>I think you're scraping a much bigger problem here that Microsoft totally missed while rushing on creating a competitor to the iPad, even though Apple specifically explained it in their promotional video: The whole user interface isn't intuitive! You actually have to learn where to tap to do what, etc. For example, I would never have expected that dragging a contact to a page shares that page with this person.</p><p>The result of this is that the user actually has to get to know the UI. This could be done by a manual (as if anybody ever reads a manual), a tutorial application (bad first experience with the device), or some kind of course like they have for using MS Word (most folks don't put up with this, unless they absolutely need this for their job). This completely removes the whole non-techy population from the target user group.</p><p> <em>You just <strong>do</strong> </em> from the Apple spot isn't an empty marketing line, it's the concept behind good user interaction design: You don't have to learn the user interface, because the user interface behaves like a regular person would expect it to, intuitively. For example, dragging an object from one place to another should put that object there. If you take a photo of your mother and place it on your notepad, you expect the photo to be there, not your mother to know everything that's written in the notepad.</p><p>And that's only scraping the surface of that video. The cut-operation is another problem, as is switching applications.</p><p>As a contrast, the only thing I ever had to explain to folks trying out my iPhone is the function of the home button ("press the button to get out of an app"), that's it. As soon as they know that, they have full control over the device.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Same thing with this tablet idea. People are too stupid to use computers, apparently, so you want to use all the power of a computer to enable them to do things like they would if all they had was a stack of paper and a Bic -- because that's what they're supposedly comfortable with</p></div><p>Well, the idea behind those real-life UIs is that people have an easier time getting started using the application, if it looks like the thing it's supposed to replace. The important part here is that the UI must not be limited by that metaphor, otherwise you could just use the original thing instead. However, the application should expand on that concept, meaning that everything should work as in the original thing, plus some more behaviors.</p><p>And actually, people really do like those interfaces. I wrote one of them, and it's pretty well-received.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But in real life , if I was being jostled back and forth on the noisy subway on my way home and I drew that box and it popped up on my screen looking all fucked-up like I just drew it , the first thing that would cross my mind would be , " God dammit , why is this computer so stupid that it ca n't tell I was trying to draw a box just now ?
Why wo n't it just make a rectangle ?
Drawing boxes was so much fucking easier when all I had to do is click my mouse button , hold it and drag .
" This UI goes beyond a solution looking for a problem .
It 's a way of actively making it harder for me to get work done with a computer.I think you 're scraping a much bigger problem here that Microsoft totally missed while rushing on creating a competitor to the iPad , even though Apple specifically explained it in their promotional video : The whole user interface is n't intuitive !
You actually have to learn where to tap to do what , etc .
For example , I would never have expected that dragging a contact to a page shares that page with this person.The result of this is that the user actually has to get to know the UI .
This could be done by a manual ( as if anybody ever reads a manual ) , a tutorial application ( bad first experience with the device ) , or some kind of course like they have for using MS Word ( most folks do n't put up with this , unless they absolutely need this for their job ) .
This completely removes the whole non-techy population from the target user group .
You just do from the Apple spot is n't an empty marketing line , it 's the concept behind good user interaction design : You do n't have to learn the user interface , because the user interface behaves like a regular person would expect it to , intuitively .
For example , dragging an object from one place to another should put that object there .
If you take a photo of your mother and place it on your notepad , you expect the photo to be there , not your mother to know everything that 's written in the notepad.And that 's only scraping the surface of that video .
The cut-operation is another problem , as is switching applications.As a contrast , the only thing I ever had to explain to folks trying out my iPhone is the function of the home button ( " press the button to get out of an app " ) , that 's it .
As soon as they know that , they have full control over the device.Same thing with this tablet idea .
People are too stupid to use computers , apparently , so you want to use all the power of a computer to enable them to do things like they would if all they had was a stack of paper and a Bic -- because that 's what they 're supposedly comfortable withWell , the idea behind those real-life UIs is that people have an easier time getting started using the application , if it looks like the thing it 's supposed to replace .
The important part here is that the UI must not be limited by that metaphor , otherwise you could just use the original thing instead .
However , the application should expand on that concept , meaning that everything should work as in the original thing , plus some more behaviors.And actually , people really do like those interfaces .
I wrote one of them , and it 's pretty well-received .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But in real life, if I was being jostled back and forth on the noisy subway on my way home and I drew that box and it popped up on my screen looking all fucked-up like I just drew it, the first thing that would cross my mind would be, "God dammit, why is this computer so stupid that it can't tell I was trying to draw a box just now?
Why won't it just make a rectangle?
Drawing boxes was so much fucking easier when all I had to do is click my mouse button, hold it and drag.
"This UI goes beyond a solution looking for a problem.
It's a way of actively making it harder for me to get work done with a computer.I think you're scraping a much bigger problem here that Microsoft totally missed while rushing on creating a competitor to the iPad, even though Apple specifically explained it in their promotional video: The whole user interface isn't intuitive!
You actually have to learn where to tap to do what, etc.
For example, I would never have expected that dragging a contact to a page shares that page with this person.The result of this is that the user actually has to get to know the UI.
This could be done by a manual (as if anybody ever reads a manual), a tutorial application (bad first experience with the device), or some kind of course like they have for using MS Word (most folks don't put up with this, unless they absolutely need this for their job).
This completely removes the whole non-techy population from the target user group.
You just do  from the Apple spot isn't an empty marketing line, it's the concept behind good user interaction design: You don't have to learn the user interface, because the user interface behaves like a regular person would expect it to, intuitively.
For example, dragging an object from one place to another should put that object there.
If you take a photo of your mother and place it on your notepad, you expect the photo to be there, not your mother to know everything that's written in the notepad.And that's only scraping the surface of that video.
The cut-operation is another problem, as is switching applications.As a contrast, the only thing I ever had to explain to folks trying out my iPhone is the function of the home button ("press the button to get out of an app"), that's it.
As soon as they know that, they have full control over the device.Same thing with this tablet idea.
People are too stupid to use computers, apparently, so you want to use all the power of a computer to enable them to do things like they would if all they had was a stack of paper and a Bic -- because that's what they're supposedly comfortable withWell, the idea behind those real-life UIs is that people have an easier time getting started using the application, if it looks like the thing it's supposed to replace.
The important part here is that the UI must not be limited by that metaphor, otherwise you could just use the original thing instead.
However, the application should expand on that concept, meaning that everything should work as in the original thing, plus some more behaviors.And actually, people really do like those interfaces.
I wrote one of them, and it's pretty well-received.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31379694</id>
	<title>Re:Until I can buy one</title>
	<author>blackraven14250</author>
	<datestamp>1267872240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It will take MSFt 3 years to duplicate the iphones major interface elements for touch screens.</p></div><p>Good thing they're not a cheap Chinese knockoff and that they make their own (at least semi-)unique products, or else you'd be right.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It will take MSFt 3 years to duplicate the iphones major interface elements for touch screens.Good thing they 're not a cheap Chinese knockoff and that they make their own ( at least semi- ) unique products , or else you 'd be right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will take MSFt 3 years to duplicate the iphones major interface elements for touch screens.Good thing they're not a cheap Chinese knockoff and that they make their own (at least semi-)unique products, or else you'd be right.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378462</id>
	<title>Naming policy..</title>
	<author>MMInterface</author>
	<datestamp>1267807260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not really an inability, it's a policy that marketing often enforces that customers should be able to tell what the product does by the name. Most of the products start with something closer to what their code names are and the product group is told by marketing or user assistance to change it. The policy creates both lame names and unnecessarily long names as they are also often required to including the name of parent product or feature.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not really an inability , it 's a policy that marketing often enforces that customers should be able to tell what the product does by the name .
Most of the products start with something closer to what their code names are and the product group is told by marketing or user assistance to change it .
The policy creates both lame names and unnecessarily long names as they are also often required to including the name of parent product or feature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not really an inability, it's a policy that marketing often enforces that customers should be able to tell what the product does by the name.
Most of the products start with something closer to what their code names are and the product group is told by marketing or user assistance to change it.
The policy creates both lame names and unnecessarily long names as they are also often required to including the name of parent product or feature.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31379684</id>
	<title>Re:Two screens not better than one.</title>
	<author>ctid</author>
	<datestamp>1267872120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it only for successful businessmen? Pity. I might have liked it but I can't really claim to be a successful businessman.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it only for successful businessmen ?
Pity. I might have liked it but I ca n't really claim to be a successful businessman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it only for successful businessmen?
Pity. I might have liked it but I can't really claim to be a successful businessman.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31380236</id>
	<title>Re:This is very cool.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267885560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently you have not heard of the QUE proReader by Plastic Logic (http://www.plasticlogic.com). While the concept of an iPad-type device has merit, the proReader seems a better form-factor and superior screen technology.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently you have not heard of the QUE proReader by Plastic Logic ( http : //www.plasticlogic.com ) .
While the concept of an iPad-type device has merit , the proReader seems a better form-factor and superior screen technology .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently you have not heard of the QUE proReader by Plastic Logic (http://www.plasticlogic.com).
While the concept of an iPad-type device has merit, the proReader seems a better form-factor and superior screen technology.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378568</id>
	<title>jeffgtr</title>
	<author>jeffgtr</author>
	<datestamp>1267808520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why mimic a book? The book was designed around paper. The ipad and it's ilk are not based on paper. IMHO there is no benefit in two screens if you really think about it. It seems to me they are trying to shoehorn a book into a different medium instead of of taking a fresh look at how to present information and ideas. Bad idea, makes the device more expensive with no added benefit.

As far as pen input goes. I can type twice as fast as I can write and would bet most of the folks on slashdot can relate. We've used pen and paper for a very long time and there has been no viable alternative. This "thing" is just a prototype and it's certainly not a step forward.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why mimic a book ?
The book was designed around paper .
The ipad and it 's ilk are not based on paper .
IMHO there is no benefit in two screens if you really think about it .
It seems to me they are trying to shoehorn a book into a different medium instead of of taking a fresh look at how to present information and ideas .
Bad idea , makes the device more expensive with no added benefit .
As far as pen input goes .
I can type twice as fast as I can write and would bet most of the folks on slashdot can relate .
We 've used pen and paper for a very long time and there has been no viable alternative .
This " thing " is just a prototype and it 's certainly not a step forward .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why mimic a book?
The book was designed around paper.
The ipad and it's ilk are not based on paper.
IMHO there is no benefit in two screens if you really think about it.
It seems to me they are trying to shoehorn a book into a different medium instead of of taking a fresh look at how to present information and ideas.
Bad idea, makes the device more expensive with no added benefit.
As far as pen input goes.
I can type twice as fast as I can write and would bet most of the folks on slashdot can relate.
We've used pen and paper for a very long time and there has been no viable alternative.
This "thing" is just a prototype and it's certainly not a step forward.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377098</id>
	<title>NICE!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267793400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can't wait to see this on the market...  Might postpone all purchases in wait for it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't wait to see this on the market... Might postpone all purchases in wait for it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't wait to see this on the market...  Might postpone all purchases in wait for it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376512</id>
	<title>Correct Links</title>
	<author>tekgoblin</author>
	<datestamp>1267789080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The story was originally posted by me, but slashdot grabbed the wrong links.

Follow this one, <a href="http://www.tekgoblin.com/2227/news/microsoft-courier-pictures/" title="tekgoblin.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.tekgoblin.com/2227/news/microsoft-courier-pictures/</a> [tekgoblin.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The story was originally posted by me , but slashdot grabbed the wrong links .
Follow this one , http : //www.tekgoblin.com/2227/news/microsoft-courier-pictures/ [ tekgoblin.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The story was originally posted by me, but slashdot grabbed the wrong links.
Follow this one, http://www.tekgoblin.com/2227/news/microsoft-courier-pictures/ [tekgoblin.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376686</id>
	<title>How much?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267790100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's it going to cost?</p><p>If it weighs in at $1000, I'll pass.  $299 and I'll buy three of them.  Okay, maybe not, but I'll really want to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's it going to cost ? If it weighs in at $ 1000 , I 'll pass .
$ 299 and I 'll buy three of them .
Okay , maybe not , but I 'll really want to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's it going to cost?If it weighs in at $1000, I'll pass.
$299 and I'll buy three of them.
Okay, maybe not, but I'll really want to.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31384730</id>
	<title>Re:That's right, because handwriting on screens ru</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267880280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>a) Handwriting recognition software. It exists.<br>b) Just because you don't do anything related to science, mathematics, or engineering, doesn't mean there won't be benefit for someone else out there<br>c) Just because you chose the wrong tool for the job doesn't mean the tool doesn't work. You're basically saying "how come i can't get draw a square with this drawing compass?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>a ) Handwriting recognition software .
It exists.b ) Just because you do n't do anything related to science , mathematics , or engineering , does n't mean there wo n't be benefit for someone else out therec ) Just because you chose the wrong tool for the job does n't mean the tool does n't work .
You 're basically saying " how come i ca n't get draw a square with this drawing compass ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a) Handwriting recognition software.
It exists.b) Just because you don't do anything related to science, mathematics, or engineering, doesn't mean there won't be benefit for someone else out therec) Just because you chose the wrong tool for the job doesn't mean the tool doesn't work.
You're basically saying "how come i can't get draw a square with this drawing compass?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376844</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong link</title>
	<author>religious freak</author>
	<datestamp>1267791240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here's another snazzy vid (first one after the brief article).  <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/microsofts-courier-digital-journal-exclusive-pictures-and-de/" title="engadget.com">http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/microsofts-courier-digital-journal-exclusive-pictures-and-de/</a> [engadget.com] <br> <br>
I don't care who makes new tech, I just care that it work like I need/want it to.  I hope msft delivers, but after surface and photosynth (which I don't think has been put to any amazing uses), I'm extremely skeptical.  I hope they make it happen though.  This looks great.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's another snazzy vid ( first one after the brief article ) .
http : //www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/microsofts-courier-digital-journal-exclusive-pictures-and-de/ [ engadget.com ] I do n't care who makes new tech , I just care that it work like I need/want it to .
I hope msft delivers , but after surface and photosynth ( which I do n't think has been put to any amazing uses ) , I 'm extremely skeptical .
I hope they make it happen though .
This looks great .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's another snazzy vid (first one after the brief article).
http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/05/microsofts-courier-digital-journal-exclusive-pictures-and-de/ [engadget.com]  
I don't care who makes new tech, I just care that it work like I need/want it to.
I hope msft delivers, but after surface and photosynth (which I don't think has been put to any amazing uses), I'm extremely skeptical.
I hope they make it happen though.
This looks great.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377702</id>
	<title>looks cool and useful</title>
	<author>enter to exit</author>
	<datestamp>1267799520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It seems much better than the ipad but i don't think that matters. Everyone knows the new zune (and the old zune for that matter) is much better than the ipods but they don't sell well. <br> <br>

MS has a real image problem that it can probably never fix. MS is seen as the company that makes boring operating systems for boring computers (the lols that  the "windows 7 party" promotion caused is proof of that).  <br> <br>

These type of imbedded devices are MSs Achilles' heel. they are largely independant and immune to MSs tradtional vendor lock-in.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems much better than the ipad but i do n't think that matters .
Everyone knows the new zune ( and the old zune for that matter ) is much better than the ipods but they do n't sell well .
MS has a real image problem that it can probably never fix .
MS is seen as the company that makes boring operating systems for boring computers ( the lols that the " windows 7 party " promotion caused is proof of that ) .
These type of imbedded devices are MSs Achilles ' heel .
they are largely independant and immune to MSs tradtional vendor lock-in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems much better than the ipad but i don't think that matters.
Everyone knows the new zune (and the old zune for that matter) is much better than the ipods but they don't sell well.
MS has a real image problem that it can probably never fix.
MS is seen as the company that makes boring operating systems for boring computers (the lols that  the "windows 7 party" promotion caused is proof of that).
These type of imbedded devices are MSs Achilles' heel.
they are largely independant and immune to MSs tradtional vendor lock-in.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31407806</id>
	<title>Re:Not a netbook/iPad/laptop competitor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1268052900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ill buy it now if it was for sale, you can buy the ipad, it will be good for those days of the month.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ill buy it now if it was for sale , you can buy the ipad , it will be good for those days of the month .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ill buy it now if it was for sale, you can buy the ipad, it will be good for those days of the month.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378320</id>
	<title>Not a netbook/iPad/laptop competitor</title>
	<author>SmokeSerpent</author>
	<datestamp>1267805820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a special-purpose device. It's competing with paper notebooks and binders, or at best, with a laptop + pen input for specific applications.</p><p>This isn't for watching movies, playing games, or *really* browsing the web. It's for taking notes, gathering reference materials, and collaborating.</p><p>The question isn't whether it can be a better tablet than the iPad and other coming products, but whether Microsoft can convince people in the design business that this will be quicker/more convenient enough for them than their current way of doing things to justify investing in the device.</p><p>For the typical consumer, this will be too expensive and not convergent enough to be worth buying, the question is whether it is useful and divergent enough for the target market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a special-purpose device .
It 's competing with paper notebooks and binders , or at best , with a laptop + pen input for specific applications.This is n't for watching movies , playing games , or * really * browsing the web .
It 's for taking notes , gathering reference materials , and collaborating.The question is n't whether it can be a better tablet than the iPad and other coming products , but whether Microsoft can convince people in the design business that this will be quicker/more convenient enough for them than their current way of doing things to justify investing in the device.For the typical consumer , this will be too expensive and not convergent enough to be worth buying , the question is whether it is useful and divergent enough for the target market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a special-purpose device.
It's competing with paper notebooks and binders, or at best, with a laptop + pen input for specific applications.This isn't for watching movies, playing games, or *really* browsing the web.
It's for taking notes, gathering reference materials, and collaborating.The question isn't whether it can be a better tablet than the iPad and other coming products, but whether Microsoft can convince people in the design business that this will be quicker/more convenient enough for them than their current way of doing things to justify investing in the device.For the typical consumer, this will be too expensive and not convergent enough to be worth buying, the question is whether it is useful and divergent enough for the target market.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378456</id>
	<title>Re:Two screens not better than one.</title>
	<author>LynnwoodRooster</author>
	<datestamp>1267807080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Breaking a screen into two smaller ones and sticking a giant hinge/bezel in the middle isn't an advantage.</p><p>Even reading a regular text ebook. Two screens aren't an advantage, they are a hindrance.</p></div><p>Yes, because that thing called a "printed book" which has that exact same user interface is such a failure...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Breaking a screen into two smaller ones and sticking a giant hinge/bezel in the middle is n't an advantage.Even reading a regular text ebook .
Two screens are n't an advantage , they are a hindrance.Yes , because that thing called a " printed book " which has that exact same user interface is such a failure.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Breaking a screen into two smaller ones and sticking a giant hinge/bezel in the middle isn't an advantage.Even reading a regular text ebook.
Two screens aren't an advantage, they are a hindrance.Yes, because that thing called a "printed book" which has that exact same user interface is such a failure...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31382196</id>
	<title>Re:Two screens not better than one.</title>
	<author>TrekkieGod</author>
	<datestamp>1267905180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Think about watching video on this. You have half the screen and turned sideways.</p></div><p>I do.  And I think it's a huge advantage, similar to what I do with dual monitor.  Video on one screen, while I still get to do other things on the device on the other screen.  If I just want to dedicate my entire time to watching the video, I'll watch it on my 60" screen, thank you very much.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Now it might be good for a few things where you can flick it between the two small screens, BUT you could easily do the same thing on one bigger screen by creating a software split between the halves.</p></div><p>But now you've lost the ability to fold it, which is a nice feature for a portable device.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Think about watching video on this .
You have half the screen and turned sideways.I do .
And I think it 's a huge advantage , similar to what I do with dual monitor .
Video on one screen , while I still get to do other things on the device on the other screen .
If I just want to dedicate my entire time to watching the video , I 'll watch it on my 60 " screen , thank you very much.Now it might be good for a few things where you can flick it between the two small screens , BUT you could easily do the same thing on one bigger screen by creating a software split between the halves.But now you 've lost the ability to fold it , which is a nice feature for a portable device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think about watching video on this.
You have half the screen and turned sideways.I do.
And I think it's a huge advantage, similar to what I do with dual monitor.
Video on one screen, while I still get to do other things on the device on the other screen.
If I just want to dedicate my entire time to watching the video, I'll watch it on my 60" screen, thank you very much.Now it might be good for a few things where you can flick it between the two small screens, BUT you could easily do the same thing on one bigger screen by creating a software split between the halves.But now you've lost the ability to fold it, which is a nice feature for a portable device.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31380366</id>
	<title>Re:Not a netbook/iPad/laptop competitor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267887360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Something I really like about this is it seems like an adult device, and it's pitched as such: the expectation is that you use it to create, and the set-up - touch for consumption, a pen for creating - encourages you to engage productively with the material you browse. <br> <br>What bugs me about the iPad as a concept is that it appears designed around lazy, passive consumption. You're meant to sit, presumably with your jaw hanging slightly open, with your eyes focused on a point about 30cm ahead of you. <br> <br>It pours pictures, texts, sounds into your head, but it doesn't encourage you to do anything with that raw consumption. Microsoft's answer demands more from it's user, and because of that I find it far more appealing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Something I really like about this is it seems like an adult device , and it 's pitched as such : the expectation is that you use it to create , and the set-up - touch for consumption , a pen for creating - encourages you to engage productively with the material you browse .
What bugs me about the iPad as a concept is that it appears designed around lazy , passive consumption .
You 're meant to sit , presumably with your jaw hanging slightly open , with your eyes focused on a point about 30cm ahead of you .
It pours pictures , texts , sounds into your head , but it does n't encourage you to do anything with that raw consumption .
Microsoft 's answer demands more from it 's user , and because of that I find it far more appealing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something I really like about this is it seems like an adult device, and it's pitched as such: the expectation is that you use it to create, and the set-up - touch for consumption, a pen for creating - encourages you to engage productively with the material you browse.
What bugs me about the iPad as a concept is that it appears designed around lazy, passive consumption.
You're meant to sit, presumably with your jaw hanging slightly open, with your eyes focused on a point about 30cm ahead of you.
It pours pictures, texts, sounds into your head, but it doesn't encourage you to do anything with that raw consumption.
Microsoft's answer demands more from it's user, and because of that I find it far more appealing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31379922</id>
	<title>Re:I'm Wary of Microsoft.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267878480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But they rushed Vista so bad they FUBARed the whole stupid thing and had to rerelease (and charge money for) an entire new OS to fix their screw ups.<b> Again, they profit at the expense of their consumers.</b></p> </div><p>So basically you loathe capitalism?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But they rushed Vista so bad they FUBARed the whole stupid thing and had to rerelease ( and charge money for ) an entire new OS to fix their screw ups .
Again , they profit at the expense of their consumers .
So basically you loathe capitalism ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But they rushed Vista so bad they FUBARed the whole stupid thing and had to rerelease (and charge money for) an entire new OS to fix their screw ups.
Again, they profit at the expense of their consumers.
So basically you loathe capitalism?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378290</id>
	<title>Re:Two screens not better than one, not</title>
	<author>BBF\_BBF</author>
	<datestamp>1267805520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For a portable item, having two screens that can be folded during transportation is definitely an advantage. <br>
<br>
Just look at the DS vs. the PSP... which one is more rugged? <br>
<br>
I'd rather have two 7" screens that fold closed on top of each other rather than a single 9.5" screen with the same viewing area on a portable tablet/ebook like device.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For a portable item , having two screens that can be folded during transportation is definitely an advantage .
Just look at the DS vs. the PSP... which one is more rugged ?
I 'd rather have two 7 " screens that fold closed on top of each other rather than a single 9.5 " screen with the same viewing area on a portable tablet/ebook like device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For a portable item, having two screens that can be folded during transportation is definitely an advantage.
Just look at the DS vs. the PSP... which one is more rugged?
I'd rather have two 7" screens that fold closed on top of each other rather than a single 9.5" screen with the same viewing area on a portable tablet/ebook like device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377918</id>
	<title>Re:That's right, because handwriting on screens ru</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267801920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If this (potential) future product can do what current products can, handwriting neatness will be of no concern.</p></div><p>My handwriting is so bad that frequently I can't read it myself afterwards. You guess the software can do that for me then?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If this ( potential ) future product can do what current products can , handwriting neatness will be of no concern.My handwriting is so bad that frequently I ca n't read it myself afterwards .
You guess the software can do that for me then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this (potential) future product can do what current products can, handwriting neatness will be of no concern.My handwriting is so bad that frequently I can't read it myself afterwards.
You guess the software can do that for me then?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377572</id>
	<title>doesn't this remind you guys of something...?</title>
	<author>tmp31416</author>
	<datestamp>1267798380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i can't believe no one brought up what this thing looks like.</p><p>really, go back roughly 25 years.</p><p>think.  the 80's aren't that far back.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...no one remembers?</p><p>for those who can't remember or, most probably, weren't born in the 80s, this thing is a copy of apple's knowledge navigator.</p><p>(link: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge\_Navigator" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge\_Navigator</a> [wikipedia.org])</p><p>i know apple never brought it to market (it was just some concept thingie that only existed in a video and in sculley's book), but nonetheless... feels like microsoft copied apple again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i ca n't believe no one brought up what this thing looks like.really , go back roughly 25 years.think .
the 80 's are n't that far back .
...no one remembers ? for those who ca n't remember or , most probably , were n't born in the 80s , this thing is a copy of apple 's knowledge navigator .
( link : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge \ _Navigator [ wikipedia.org ] ) i know apple never brought it to market ( it was just some concept thingie that only existed in a video and in sculley 's book ) , but nonetheless... feels like microsoft copied apple again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i can't believe no one brought up what this thing looks like.really, go back roughly 25 years.think.
the 80's aren't that far back.
...no one remembers?for those who can't remember or, most probably, weren't born in the 80s, this thing is a copy of apple's knowledge navigator.
(link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge\_Navigator [wikipedia.org])i know apple never brought it to market (it was just some concept thingie that only existed in a video and in sculley's book), but nonetheless... feels like microsoft copied apple again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377126</id>
	<title>What does "prototype" mean here?</title>
	<author>joh</author>
	<datestamp>1267793520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would say "prototype" usually means some working hard- and software, a real device. Not in mass production or finally nailed down, but something that really exists and can be touched and basically works.</p><p>So, are there pictures of that device? I have seen nothing than renderings and UI mockups yet and people talking of a "prototype" when there is just a "concept" drive me crazy.</p><p>And I also don't get it when people talk about "multi-touch" and seem to mean "you can touch and swipe and gesture everywhere and everywhere every touch and swipe and gesture does something different. Isn't it great?". No! It isn't!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would say " prototype " usually means some working hard- and software , a real device .
Not in mass production or finally nailed down , but something that really exists and can be touched and basically works.So , are there pictures of that device ?
I have seen nothing than renderings and UI mockups yet and people talking of a " prototype " when there is just a " concept " drive me crazy.And I also do n't get it when people talk about " multi-touch " and seem to mean " you can touch and swipe and gesture everywhere and everywhere every touch and swipe and gesture does something different .
Is n't it great ? " .
No ! It is n't !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would say "prototype" usually means some working hard- and software, a real device.
Not in mass production or finally nailed down, but something that really exists and can be touched and basically works.So, are there pictures of that device?
I have seen nothing than renderings and UI mockups yet and people talking of a "prototype" when there is just a "concept" drive me crazy.And I also don't get it when people talk about "multi-touch" and seem to mean "you can touch and swipe and gesture everywhere and everywhere every touch and swipe and gesture does something different.
Isn't it great?".
No! It isn't!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377470</id>
	<title>Re:That's right, because handwriting on screens ru</title>
	<author>mrcleaver</author>
	<datestamp>1267797180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I certainly see a benefit to being able to do things with a pen, mostly for taking notes in class etc. </p><p>Typing your notes on a word processor just doesn't give you the same amount of freedom to write in formulas, circle important concepts, doodle, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I certainly see a benefit to being able to do things with a pen , mostly for taking notes in class etc .
Typing your notes on a word processor just does n't give you the same amount of freedom to write in formulas , circle important concepts , doodle , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I certainly see a benefit to being able to do things with a pen, mostly for taking notes in class etc.
Typing your notes on a word processor just doesn't give you the same amount of freedom to write in formulas, circle important concepts, doodle, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31393772</id>
	<title>So, settled yet?</title>
	<author>toriver</author>
	<datestamp>1267957320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have they decided for the last time what the Courier name should be used for?</p><p><a href="http://images.appleinsider.com/courier.001.png" title="appleinsider.com">http://images.appleinsider.com/courier.001.png</a> [appleinsider.com]</p><p>They are playing catch-up to Apple so hard it is almost painful to see.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have they decided for the last time what the Courier name should be used for ? http : //images.appleinsider.com/courier.001.png [ appleinsider.com ] They are playing catch-up to Apple so hard it is almost painful to see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have they decided for the last time what the Courier name should be used for?http://images.appleinsider.com/courier.001.png [appleinsider.com]They are playing catch-up to Apple so hard it is almost painful to see.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376510</id>
	<title>Courier?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267789020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if I want a Comic Sans?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if I want a Comic Sans ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if I want a Comic Sans?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377352</id>
	<title>Re:I'm Wary of Microsoft.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267795680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Again, they profit at the expense of their consumers.</p></div><p>Ok, I usually happy to bash Microsoft myself; but do you realize that the whole purpose of any business is to do exactly that?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Again , they profit at the expense of their consumers.Ok , I usually happy to bash Microsoft myself ; but do you realize that the whole purpose of any business is to do exactly that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Again, they profit at the expense of their consumers.Ok, I usually happy to bash Microsoft myself; but do you realize that the whole purpose of any business is to do exactly that?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376698</id>
	<title>Re:Pre?</title>
	<author>DAldredge</author>
	<datestamp>1267790160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would you please stop killing<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would you please stop killing / .
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would you please stop killing /.
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376660</id>
	<title>Re:Courier?</title>
	<author>Virak</author>
	<datestamp>1267789920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well you can't always get what you want. And roving bands of angry, pitchfork-wielding graphic designer vigilantes make sure that fans of Comic Sans <i>never</i> get what they want. They'll be at your door shortly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well you ca n't always get what you want .
And roving bands of angry , pitchfork-wielding graphic designer vigilantes make sure that fans of Comic Sans never get what they want .
They 'll be at your door shortly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well you can't always get what you want.
And roving bands of angry, pitchfork-wielding graphic designer vigilantes make sure that fans of Comic Sans never get what they want.
They'll be at your door shortly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377086</id>
	<title>MSI has a similar device (dual 7"</title>
	<author>grumpyman</author>
	<datestamp>1267793160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... without the proper software.. yet.

<a href="http://blog.laptopmag.com/msis-dual-screen-tablet-video-hands-on-much-more-than-an-ereader" title="laptopmag.com">http://blog.laptopmag.com/msis-dual-screen-tablet-video-hands-on-much-more-than-an-ereader</a> [laptopmag.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>... without the proper software.. yet . http : //blog.laptopmag.com/msis-dual-screen-tablet-video-hands-on-much-more-than-an-ereader [ laptopmag.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... without the proper software.. yet.

http://blog.laptopmag.com/msis-dual-screen-tablet-video-hands-on-much-more-than-an-ereader [laptopmag.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31381178</id>
	<title>Re:Two screens not better than one.</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1267895820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Think about watching video on this. You have half the screen and turned sideways.</p></div><p>When I think about that, I think about the DS. The top part would show the video, with nothing over the top of it. The top of the bottom screen would show the ribbon and the numbers and such. The bottom of the bottom screen would feature the controls. When you weren't using the controls, the backlight on that display would be reduced.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Think about watching video on this .
You have half the screen and turned sideways.When I think about that , I think about the DS .
The top part would show the video , with nothing over the top of it .
The top of the bottom screen would show the ribbon and the numbers and such .
The bottom of the bottom screen would feature the controls .
When you were n't using the controls , the backlight on that display would be reduced .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think about watching video on this.
You have half the screen and turned sideways.When I think about that, I think about the DS.
The top part would show the video, with nothing over the top of it.
The top of the bottom screen would show the ribbon and the numbers and such.
The bottom of the bottom screen would feature the controls.
When you weren't using the controls, the backlight on that display would be reduced.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377218</id>
	<title>Re:That's right, because handwriting on screens ru</title>
	<author>im\_thatoneguy</author>
	<datestamp>1267794480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like what you want is a laptop. You should buy one of those instead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like what you want is a laptop .
You should buy one of those instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like what you want is a laptop.
You should buy one of those instead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377008</id>
	<title>Re:Booklet?</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1267792500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This soon after the iPad is announced, 'Booklet' is considered a bad name?   Really?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This soon after the iPad is announced , 'Booklet ' is considered a bad name ?
Really ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This soon after the iPad is announced, 'Booklet' is considered a bad name?
Really?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31381146</id>
	<title>Re:yes,</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1267895460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Odds are that it will, because it runs Windows CE. In order for anything to be supported by Windows CE someone needs to create a description used by CE for the build, and it has to have a supported core. For the most part this seems to be ARM, MIPS, or x86. All of these are well-explored territory for Linux. If enough of them are sold at low enough price, then someone or some group will almost certainly get Linux to run on it. Microsoft was exploring having their own hardware back in the day, but never really got any complicated silicon built for them until recently, starting with the Xbox or so. Of course, if this thing were descended more from the Zune than from anything else WinCE has ever been installed upon then the story might be different. I haven't seen any proof of Linux running on Zune yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Odds are that it will , because it runs Windows CE .
In order for anything to be supported by Windows CE someone needs to create a description used by CE for the build , and it has to have a supported core .
For the most part this seems to be ARM , MIPS , or x86 .
All of these are well-explored territory for Linux .
If enough of them are sold at low enough price , then someone or some group will almost certainly get Linux to run on it .
Microsoft was exploring having their own hardware back in the day , but never really got any complicated silicon built for them until recently , starting with the Xbox or so .
Of course , if this thing were descended more from the Zune than from anything else WinCE has ever been installed upon then the story might be different .
I have n't seen any proof of Linux running on Zune yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Odds are that it will, because it runs Windows CE.
In order for anything to be supported by Windows CE someone needs to create a description used by CE for the build, and it has to have a supported core.
For the most part this seems to be ARM, MIPS, or x86.
All of these are well-explored territory for Linux.
If enough of them are sold at low enough price, then someone or some group will almost certainly get Linux to run on it.
Microsoft was exploring having their own hardware back in the day, but never really got any complicated silicon built for them until recently, starting with the Xbox or so.
Of course, if this thing were descended more from the Zune than from anything else WinCE has ever been installed upon then the story might be different.
I haven't seen any proof of Linux running on Zune yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376986</id>
	<title>Re:That's right, because handwriting on screens ru</title>
	<author>BobMcD</author>
	<datestamp>1267792260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, where to begin... This looks good:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It reminds me of all the VRML hype from years back. People were predicting that in the future, we wouldn't type URLs into a Web browser. We'd fire up our Avatars and fly to places on the Web in 3-D graphics. We would walk through virtual libraries, pulling electronic books off 3-D shelves. We'd ride dragons to meeting rooms where we'd chat with other avatars in real time. And all I could think was, "WTF? So we've just invented the Internet, this miraculous thing that puts the world of information right at your fingertips, no matter where you are, so that all you have to do is type a couple things and the information instantly appears on your screen... and you want to impose a 3-D spatial paradigm on it? Instead of calling up information out of thin air, you want to have to hike down the virtual block to get it? You call that progress?"</p></div><p>I wonder if you're familiar with <a href="http://secondlife.com/" title="secondlife.com">Second Life</a> [secondlife.com]?</p><p>And yes, for many, it is considered progress.  Or at least it was.  I'm not sure how many big corps are still onboard, but there were buzzings of private servers for employee training and the like.  Anyway it turns out that while it hasn't applied to the web as a whole, people really did cotton to that idea.  Lots of people.  Even some important ones.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Same thing with this tablet idea. People are too stupid to use computers, apparently, so you want to use all the power of a computer to enable them to do things like they would if all they had was a stack of paper and a Bic -- because that's what they're supposedly comfortable with.</p></div><p>Taking your finger and pointing it is about as basic as it gets.  Using a pen is just an extension of that.  Paper made it more portable than cave walls.  People aren't all that keen on using keyboards everywhere they go because they're simply not natural.  How many of those full-size, fold-able keyboards sold as accessories to cell phones really see any daily use?</p><p>I think the device looks like an innovative approach to 'infinite paper', which is basically what the videos bill it out to be.  It looks like a huge step beyond what tablets presently mean, and seems to offer it in a better form factor.</p><p>Meanwhile your desktop will be right where you last left it, with the keyboard still attached.</p><p>I guess I'm not quite sure what you're rambling about, but I'm pretty certain the words you are searching for involve 'kids' and 'off' and 'lawn'.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , where to begin... This looks good : It reminds me of all the VRML hype from years back .
People were predicting that in the future , we would n't type URLs into a Web browser .
We 'd fire up our Avatars and fly to places on the Web in 3-D graphics .
We would walk through virtual libraries , pulling electronic books off 3-D shelves .
We 'd ride dragons to meeting rooms where we 'd chat with other avatars in real time .
And all I could think was , " WTF ?
So we 've just invented the Internet , this miraculous thing that puts the world of information right at your fingertips , no matter where you are , so that all you have to do is type a couple things and the information instantly appears on your screen... and you want to impose a 3-D spatial paradigm on it ?
Instead of calling up information out of thin air , you want to have to hike down the virtual block to get it ?
You call that progress ?
" I wonder if you 're familiar with Second Life [ secondlife.com ] ? And yes , for many , it is considered progress .
Or at least it was .
I 'm not sure how many big corps are still onboard , but there were buzzings of private servers for employee training and the like .
Anyway it turns out that while it has n't applied to the web as a whole , people really did cotton to that idea .
Lots of people .
Even some important ones.Same thing with this tablet idea .
People are too stupid to use computers , apparently , so you want to use all the power of a computer to enable them to do things like they would if all they had was a stack of paper and a Bic -- because that 's what they 're supposedly comfortable with.Taking your finger and pointing it is about as basic as it gets .
Using a pen is just an extension of that .
Paper made it more portable than cave walls .
People are n't all that keen on using keyboards everywhere they go because they 're simply not natural .
How many of those full-size , fold-able keyboards sold as accessories to cell phones really see any daily use ? I think the device looks like an innovative approach to 'infinite paper ' , which is basically what the videos bill it out to be .
It looks like a huge step beyond what tablets presently mean , and seems to offer it in a better form factor.Meanwhile your desktop will be right where you last left it , with the keyboard still attached.I guess I 'm not quite sure what you 're rambling about , but I 'm pretty certain the words you are searching for involve 'kids ' and 'off ' and 'lawn' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, where to begin... This looks good:It reminds me of all the VRML hype from years back.
People were predicting that in the future, we wouldn't type URLs into a Web browser.
We'd fire up our Avatars and fly to places on the Web in 3-D graphics.
We would walk through virtual libraries, pulling electronic books off 3-D shelves.
We'd ride dragons to meeting rooms where we'd chat with other avatars in real time.
And all I could think was, "WTF?
So we've just invented the Internet, this miraculous thing that puts the world of information right at your fingertips, no matter where you are, so that all you have to do is type a couple things and the information instantly appears on your screen... and you want to impose a 3-D spatial paradigm on it?
Instead of calling up information out of thin air, you want to have to hike down the virtual block to get it?
You call that progress?
"I wonder if you're familiar with Second Life [secondlife.com]?And yes, for many, it is considered progress.
Or at least it was.
I'm not sure how many big corps are still onboard, but there were buzzings of private servers for employee training and the like.
Anyway it turns out that while it hasn't applied to the web as a whole, people really did cotton to that idea.
Lots of people.
Even some important ones.Same thing with this tablet idea.
People are too stupid to use computers, apparently, so you want to use all the power of a computer to enable them to do things like they would if all they had was a stack of paper and a Bic -- because that's what they're supposedly comfortable with.Taking your finger and pointing it is about as basic as it gets.
Using a pen is just an extension of that.
Paper made it more portable than cave walls.
People aren't all that keen on using keyboards everywhere they go because they're simply not natural.
How many of those full-size, fold-able keyboards sold as accessories to cell phones really see any daily use?I think the device looks like an innovative approach to 'infinite paper', which is basically what the videos bill it out to be.
It looks like a huge step beyond what tablets presently mean, and seems to offer it in a better form factor.Meanwhile your desktop will be right where you last left it, with the keyboard still attached.I guess I'm not quite sure what you're rambling about, but I'm pretty certain the words you are searching for involve 'kids' and 'off' and 'lawn'.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376570</id>
	<title>Device for sorthing shoes</title>
	<author>Lord Lode</author>
	<datestamp>1267789380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow so Microsoft invented a device for sorting digital shoes? Cool! Hip!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow so Microsoft invented a device for sorting digital shoes ?
Cool ! Hip !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow so Microsoft invented a device for sorting digital shoes?
Cool! Hip!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377138</id>
	<title>What's wrong with you people?!?!?!</title>
	<author>siglercm</author>
	<datestamp>1267793640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This story was posted over an hour ago, and no one has made a joke yet about it being just as fast as a Courier POTS modem from US Robotics....  Man, I'm losing my faith in geek-kind.</p><p>Also, you kids get off my lawn!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This story was posted over an hour ago , and no one has made a joke yet about it being just as fast as a Courier POTS modem from US Robotics.... Man , I 'm losing my faith in geek-kind.Also , you kids get off my lawn !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This story was posted over an hour ago, and no one has made a joke yet about it being just as fast as a Courier POTS modem from US Robotics....  Man, I'm losing my faith in geek-kind.Also, you kids get off my lawn!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376742</id>
	<title>Microsoft or Nintendo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267790460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Inductive charging is way cool, but the rest of it sounds like just a larger version of the Nintendo DS! Not real innovative, if you know what I mean. Can't somebody simply make a tablet PC with USB ports, so I can plug in external memory, keyboard, mouse, etc.?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Inductive charging is way cool , but the rest of it sounds like just a larger version of the Nintendo DS !
Not real innovative , if you know what I mean .
Ca n't somebody simply make a tablet PC with USB ports , so I can plug in external memory , keyboard , mouse , etc .
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Inductive charging is way cool, but the rest of it sounds like just a larger version of the Nintendo DS!
Not real innovative, if you know what I mean.
Can't somebody simply make a tablet PC with USB ports, so I can plug in external memory, keyboard, mouse, etc.
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376718</id>
	<title>Don't be an early adopter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267790280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait for Courier New.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait for Courier New .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait for Courier New.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31387964</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong link</title>
	<author>wvmarle</author>
	<datestamp>1267960200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the first time in over a decade I'm interested in a MS product, however I'm afraid they will kill the awesome hardware form factor with buggy, poorly designed and unattractive software.
</p><p>We will probably have to wait until Linux runs on it. That shouldn't be too long.
</p><p>Or, if it is successful, for a Chinese copycat to come up with a same piece of hardware that doesn't have DRM built in (the Chinese are leaving the "copy" stage and are reaching the "copy and improve" stage like the Japanese did some 25 years ago, albeit by leaving out bits instead of adding bits!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the first time in over a decade I 'm interested in a MS product , however I 'm afraid they will kill the awesome hardware form factor with buggy , poorly designed and unattractive software .
We will probably have to wait until Linux runs on it .
That should n't be too long .
Or , if it is successful , for a Chinese copycat to come up with a same piece of hardware that does n't have DRM built in ( the Chinese are leaving the " copy " stage and are reaching the " copy and improve " stage like the Japanese did some 25 years ago , albeit by leaving out bits instead of adding bits !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the first time in over a decade I'm interested in a MS product, however I'm afraid they will kill the awesome hardware form factor with buggy, poorly designed and unattractive software.
We will probably have to wait until Linux runs on it.
That shouldn't be too long.
Or, if it is successful, for a Chinese copycat to come up with a same piece of hardware that doesn't have DRM built in (the Chinese are leaving the "copy" stage and are reaching the "copy and improve" stage like the Japanese did some 25 years ago, albeit by leaving out bits instead of adding bits!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376854</id>
	<title>Re:That's right, because handwriting on screens ru</title>
	<author>MarcoAtWork</author>
	<datestamp>1267791240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I just can't understand why Microsoft seems so obsessed with the idea that everybody's going to want to interact with a computer using a pen.</p></div></blockquote><p>because I could walk around holding the courier with one hand and writing stuff/accessing it with another even if I'm wearing gloves?</p><p>virtual keyboards like the iphone/ipad are not very good for using them on the go in my opinion, and a pen-based interface can work a lot better.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just ca n't understand why Microsoft seems so obsessed with the idea that everybody 's going to want to interact with a computer using a pen.because I could walk around holding the courier with one hand and writing stuff/accessing it with another even if I 'm wearing gloves ? virtual keyboards like the iphone/ipad are not very good for using them on the go in my opinion , and a pen-based interface can work a lot better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just can't understand why Microsoft seems so obsessed with the idea that everybody's going to want to interact with a computer using a pen.because I could walk around holding the courier with one hand and writing stuff/accessing it with another even if I'm wearing gloves?virtual keyboards like the iphone/ipad are not very good for using them on the go in my opinion, and a pen-based interface can work a lot better.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376476</id>
	<title>Until I can buy one</title>
	<author>Pop69</author>
	<datestamp>1267788840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's all just so much "me too" vapourware from Microsoft</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's all just so much " me too " vapourware from Microsoft</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's all just so much "me too" vapourware from Microsoft</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376658</id>
	<title>Re:Pre?</title>
	<author>wiredlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1267789920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Never mind that inductive charging is an inefficient waste of power. I hope the EPA comes down hard on this and denies EnergyStar certification for anyone who attempts this with a full power computer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Never mind that inductive charging is an inefficient waste of power .
I hope the EPA comes down hard on this and denies EnergyStar certification for anyone who attempts this with a full power computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never mind that inductive charging is an inefficient waste of power.
I hope the EPA comes down hard on this and denies EnergyStar certification for anyone who attempts this with a full power computer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378980</id>
	<title>Re:yes,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267813440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is that funny? That was my first thought when I saw it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is that funny ?
That was my first thought when I saw it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is that funny?
That was my first thought when I saw it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376848</id>
	<title>Re:That's right, because handwriting on screens ru</title>
	<author>L3370</author>
	<datestamp>1267791240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well if it includes handwriting recognition I don't think it will be of much concern. I've sampled Microsofts handwriting recognition on their tablet devices that are out now. I am very impressed with its capability. My handwriting is readable, but in no way pretty. It picks it up. I saw someone else write with it. He has a handwriting style that is a weird mixture of standard AND cursive writing and it still picked it up.<br> <br>
If this (potential) future product can do what current products can, handwriting neatness will be of no concern.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well if it includes handwriting recognition I do n't think it will be of much concern .
I 've sampled Microsofts handwriting recognition on their tablet devices that are out now .
I am very impressed with its capability .
My handwriting is readable , but in no way pretty .
It picks it up .
I saw someone else write with it .
He has a handwriting style that is a weird mixture of standard AND cursive writing and it still picked it up .
If this ( potential ) future product can do what current products can , handwriting neatness will be of no concern .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well if it includes handwriting recognition I don't think it will be of much concern.
I've sampled Microsofts handwriting recognition on their tablet devices that are out now.
I am very impressed with its capability.
My handwriting is readable, but in no way pretty.
It picks it up.
I saw someone else write with it.
He has a handwriting style that is a weird mixture of standard AND cursive writing and it still picked it up.
If this (potential) future product can do what current products can, handwriting neatness will be of no concern.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376556</id>
	<title>Re:Booklet?</title>
	<author>sopssa</author>
	<datestamp>1267789320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's wrong with booklet though? I think it's quite illustrative as it has two screens and you hold it like a book, and close the same way too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's wrong with booklet though ?
I think it 's quite illustrative as it has two screens and you hold it like a book , and close the same way too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's wrong with booklet though?
I think it's quite illustrative as it has two screens and you hold it like a book, and close the same way too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377142</id>
	<title>iPhone-esque</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1267793700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>iPhone-esque? I think people may be seeing things where there really is nothing. Hundreds of applications have had home buttons. Plenty of them long before apple too i'm sure. Fairly stupid to mention iphone/apple here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>iPhone-esque ?
I think people may be seeing things where there really is nothing .
Hundreds of applications have had home buttons .
Plenty of them long before apple too i 'm sure .
Fairly stupid to mention iphone/apple here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iPhone-esque?
I think people may be seeing things where there really is nothing.
Hundreds of applications have had home buttons.
Plenty of them long before apple too i'm sure.
Fairly stupid to mention iphone/apple here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376610</id>
	<title>Call it vaporware if you like...</title>
	<author>IANAAC</author>
	<datestamp>1267789620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>
It's all just so much "me too" vapourware from Microsoft</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>
It's definitely not a "me too" device.  At least I've not seen anything else in this form factor.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's all just so much " me too " vapourware from Microsoft It 's definitely not a " me too " device .
At least I 've not seen anything else in this form factor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> 
It's all just so much "me too" vapourware from Microsoft 
It's definitely not a "me too" device.
At least I've not seen anything else in this form factor.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377132</id>
	<title>with credentials like those...</title>
	<author>pydev</author>
	<datestamp>1267793580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, with the Windows-experience wizard and the designers of Xbox and Zune on board, what could possibly go wrong?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , with the Windows-experience wizard and the designers of Xbox and Zune on board , what could possibly go wrong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, with the Windows-experience wizard and the designers of Xbox and Zune on board, what could possibly go wrong?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376582</id>
	<title>Re:Until I can buy one</title>
	<author>RightSaidFred99</author>
	<datestamp>1267789440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly.  Similar to how the iPod was "me too" in response to the already existing DAP market, or how the iPad is a "me too" to tablet PC's that have been around for a decade.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
Similar to how the iPod was " me too " in response to the already existing DAP market , or how the iPad is a " me too " to tablet PC 's that have been around for a decade .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
Similar to how the iPod was "me too" in response to the already existing DAP market, or how the iPad is a "me too" to tablet PC's that have been around for a decade.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376886</id>
	<title>Re:Courier?</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1267791540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What if I want a Comic Sans?</p></div><p>I suspect you will be made to use Arial.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What if I want a Comic Sans ? I suspect you will be made to use Arial .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if I want a Comic Sans?I suspect you will be made to use Arial.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377102</id>
	<title>Two screens not better than one.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267793400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Breaking a screen into two smaller ones and sticking a giant hinge/bezel in the middle isn't an advantage.</p><p>Think about watching video on this. You have half the screen and turned sideways.</p><p>Even reading a regular text ebook. Two screens aren't an advantage, they are a hindrance.</p><p>Now it might be good for a few things where you can flick it between the two small screens, BUT you could easily do the same thing on one bigger screen by creating a software split between the halves.</p><p>Now MS may have some good SW ideas, I'll wait until they exist outside of a cartoon to comment on those, but I think they would be better delivered on a one screen device.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Breaking a screen into two smaller ones and sticking a giant hinge/bezel in the middle is n't an advantage.Think about watching video on this .
You have half the screen and turned sideways.Even reading a regular text ebook .
Two screens are n't an advantage , they are a hindrance.Now it might be good for a few things where you can flick it between the two small screens , BUT you could easily do the same thing on one bigger screen by creating a software split between the halves.Now MS may have some good SW ideas , I 'll wait until they exist outside of a cartoon to comment on those , but I think they would be better delivered on a one screen device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Breaking a screen into two smaller ones and sticking a giant hinge/bezel in the middle isn't an advantage.Think about watching video on this.
You have half the screen and turned sideways.Even reading a regular text ebook.
Two screens aren't an advantage, they are a hindrance.Now it might be good for a few things where you can flick it between the two small screens, BUT you could easily do the same thing on one bigger screen by creating a software split between the halves.Now MS may have some good SW ideas, I'll wait until they exist outside of a cartoon to comment on those, but I think they would be better delivered on a one screen device.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31379320</id>
	<title>how sturdy is it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267906440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>as a foreman I really need one of these in a padded, metal case.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>as a foreman I really need one of these in a padded , metal case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as a foreman I really need one of these in a padded, metal case.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378008</id>
	<title>Re:Two screens not better than one.</title>
	<author>Totenglocke</author>
	<datestamp>1267802700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know that this is shocking, but not all computers are made for consuming media.  If you want to just watch videos on a portable screen, then here you go <a href="http://www.apple.com/" title="apple.com">http://www.apple.com/</a> [apple.com].  However, if you would like a device that would be great for business and school use (you know, actually doing something <i>productive</i>), then the Courier is fan-freakin-tastic.  Imagine being able to get notes from a friend when you're out sick with the tap of a button.  Never having to worry about grabbing the wrong notebook and never having to worry about shuffling through piles of notes.  Being able to have the textbook open on one side of the screen (while they're fighting it, e-textbooks do exist and will become popular in the next decade or so) and taking notes on the other side.  Have a chart you need copied from the textbook into your notes?  No problem - instead of having to take a few minutes to accurately draw it, take two seconds to copy and paste it into your notes.  How can you NOT see the advantage in two screens?  Are you really that short sighted that you think just because you can't watch movies on it that it's useless?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know that this is shocking , but not all computers are made for consuming media .
If you want to just watch videos on a portable screen , then here you go http : //www.apple.com/ [ apple.com ] .
However , if you would like a device that would be great for business and school use ( you know , actually doing something productive ) , then the Courier is fan-freakin-tastic .
Imagine being able to get notes from a friend when you 're out sick with the tap of a button .
Never having to worry about grabbing the wrong notebook and never having to worry about shuffling through piles of notes .
Being able to have the textbook open on one side of the screen ( while they 're fighting it , e-textbooks do exist and will become popular in the next decade or so ) and taking notes on the other side .
Have a chart you need copied from the textbook into your notes ?
No problem - instead of having to take a few minutes to accurately draw it , take two seconds to copy and paste it into your notes .
How can you NOT see the advantage in two screens ?
Are you really that short sighted that you think just because you ca n't watch movies on it that it 's useless ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know that this is shocking, but not all computers are made for consuming media.
If you want to just watch videos on a portable screen, then here you go http://www.apple.com/ [apple.com].
However, if you would like a device that would be great for business and school use (you know, actually doing something productive), then the Courier is fan-freakin-tastic.
Imagine being able to get notes from a friend when you're out sick with the tap of a button.
Never having to worry about grabbing the wrong notebook and never having to worry about shuffling through piles of notes.
Being able to have the textbook open on one side of the screen (while they're fighting it, e-textbooks do exist and will become popular in the next decade or so) and taking notes on the other side.
Have a chart you need copied from the textbook into your notes?
No problem - instead of having to take a few minutes to accurately draw it, take two seconds to copy and paste it into your notes.
How can you NOT see the advantage in two screens?
Are you really that short sighted that you think just because you can't watch movies on it that it's useless?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378976</id>
	<title>Bullshit</title>
	<author>His Shadow</author>
	<datestamp>1267813440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>A real device is a physical entity. CGI movies are not real devices.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A real device is a physical entity .
CGI movies are not real devices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A real device is a physical entity.
CGI movies are not real devices.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378880</id>
	<title>Dual Finger+Pen mechanics are spot-on</title>
	<author>davide marney</author>
	<datestamp>1267812240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One thing that Courier nails is the concept of using both fingers and pen.  Go ahead, try it.  There are two basic pen positions: a "writing" position that uses all five fingers, and a "resting" position where the pen is rotated 90 degrees, and held in place by a single finger, leaving the other fingers free.  The writing position is vertical, resting on the edge of the hand.  The resting position is horizontal, palm down.</p><p>The Courier UI mockup uses both of these hand configurations and orientations.  Flat, horizontal motions such as flipping a page or image dragging are done in the resting position.   Vertical motions such as drawing and writing are done in writing position.  Switching between the two is very fast and natural-feeling.</p><p>Having a pen dispenses with the need for a QUERTY keyboard, but block-printing is not the solution either.  For one thing, it's too slow: the average printing speed is about 15wpm.  A better solution might be a stylus-based keyboard.  Several years ago, IBM invented a shorthand named <a href="http://domino.watson.ibm.com/comm/research.nsf/pages/r.hci.innovation.html" title="ibm.com">Shark</a> [ibm.com] (commercialized as <a href="http://www.shapewriter.com/" title="shapewriter.com">ShapeWriter</a> [shapewriter.com], I believe) that was extremely effective.  After just a few minutes of practice with it, I was able to achieve 40wpm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One thing that Courier nails is the concept of using both fingers and pen .
Go ahead , try it .
There are two basic pen positions : a " writing " position that uses all five fingers , and a " resting " position where the pen is rotated 90 degrees , and held in place by a single finger , leaving the other fingers free .
The writing position is vertical , resting on the edge of the hand .
The resting position is horizontal , palm down.The Courier UI mockup uses both of these hand configurations and orientations .
Flat , horizontal motions such as flipping a page or image dragging are done in the resting position .
Vertical motions such as drawing and writing are done in writing position .
Switching between the two is very fast and natural-feeling.Having a pen dispenses with the need for a QUERTY keyboard , but block-printing is not the solution either .
For one thing , it 's too slow : the average printing speed is about 15wpm .
A better solution might be a stylus-based keyboard .
Several years ago , IBM invented a shorthand named Shark [ ibm.com ] ( commercialized as ShapeWriter [ shapewriter.com ] , I believe ) that was extremely effective .
After just a few minutes of practice with it , I was able to achieve 40wpm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One thing that Courier nails is the concept of using both fingers and pen.
Go ahead, try it.
There are two basic pen positions: a "writing" position that uses all five fingers, and a "resting" position where the pen is rotated 90 degrees, and held in place by a single finger, leaving the other fingers free.
The writing position is vertical, resting on the edge of the hand.
The resting position is horizontal, palm down.The Courier UI mockup uses both of these hand configurations and orientations.
Flat, horizontal motions such as flipping a page or image dragging are done in the resting position.
Vertical motions such as drawing and writing are done in writing position.
Switching between the two is very fast and natural-feeling.Having a pen dispenses with the need for a QUERTY keyboard, but block-printing is not the solution either.
For one thing, it's too slow: the average printing speed is about 15wpm.
A better solution might be a stylus-based keyboard.
Several years ago, IBM invented a shorthand named Shark [ibm.com] (commercialized as ShapeWriter [shapewriter.com], I believe) that was extremely effective.
After just a few minutes of practice with it, I was able to achieve 40wpm.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378470</id>
	<title>Re:Until I can buy one</title>
	<author>easyTree</author>
	<datestamp>1267807260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd like to start a petition for an add-on to slashdot which will parse all posts - decide which ones are made by fanbois and then allow me to filter them (out!)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p><p>1) easyTree</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like to start a petition for an add-on to slashdot which will parse all posts - decide which ones are made by fanbois and then allow me to filter them ( out !
) : D1 ) easyTree</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd like to start a petition for an add-on to slashdot which will parse all posts - decide which ones are made by fanbois and then allow me to filter them (out!
) :D1) easyTree</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376448</id>
	<title>Wrong link</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267788660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article linked in the summary goes to wrong link (the same <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/09/23/1331225/Early-Details-On-Courier-Microsofts-Take-On-a-Tablet" title="slashdot.org">we discussed about in September</a> [slashdot.org])</p><p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5486583/microsoft-couriers-devolution" title="gizmodo.com">Correct article with info</a> [gizmodo.com]. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/photos/courier-user-interface/" title="engadget.com">Picture gallery is here</a> [engadget.com].</p><p>I must admit it does look awesome though. It's just perfect for use on sofa, as booklet is held like, well, a book. Laptop nor tablet aren't as nice and comfortable. There's no way I'll be buying the locked down tablet-like iPad when this is coming up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article linked in the summary goes to wrong link ( the same we discussed about in September [ slashdot.org ] ) Correct article with info [ gizmodo.com ] .
Picture gallery is here [ engadget.com ] .I must admit it does look awesome though .
It 's just perfect for use on sofa , as booklet is held like , well , a book .
Laptop nor tablet are n't as nice and comfortable .
There 's no way I 'll be buying the locked down tablet-like iPad when this is coming up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article linked in the summary goes to wrong link (the same we discussed about in September [slashdot.org])Correct article with info [gizmodo.com].
Picture gallery is here [engadget.com].I must admit it does look awesome though.
It's just perfect for use on sofa, as booklet is held like, well, a book.
Laptop nor tablet aren't as nice and comfortable.
There's no way I'll be buying the locked down tablet-like iPad when this is coming up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377480</id>
	<title>Re:Two screens not better than one.</title>
	<author>aztektum</author>
	<datestamp>1267797300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah. I'll hold off until the day we have color folding e-ink display that are as vibrant as the 24" Dell IPS panel monitor I am staring at right now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah .
I 'll hold off until the day we have color folding e-ink display that are as vibrant as the 24 " Dell IPS panel monitor I am staring at right now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah.
I'll hold off until the day we have color folding e-ink display that are as vibrant as the 24" Dell IPS panel monitor I am staring at right now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377038</id>
	<title>Re:That's right, because handwriting on screens ru</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267792860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I doubt you could fit a keyboard inside that thing, I mean... it's so tiny!</p><p>You see, what you whine about is old technology, what you saw, was a presentation made by the marketing crew using a flash animation.</p><p>OCR when implemented correctly with good algorithms and combined with a fast cpu can be very efficient, not as fast as writing on a keyboard, but that's a sacrifice you have to make for downsizing. A pen is perfect for touching delicate things and mediating your gestures into fine motor control, hence the longevity of the invention.</p><p>What you are saying is; don't try to make one, I didn't like the last one I tried! We all know the best input method is telepathically.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt you could fit a keyboard inside that thing , I mean... it 's so tiny ! You see , what you whine about is old technology , what you saw , was a presentation made by the marketing crew using a flash animation.OCR when implemented correctly with good algorithms and combined with a fast cpu can be very efficient , not as fast as writing on a keyboard , but that 's a sacrifice you have to make for downsizing .
A pen is perfect for touching delicate things and mediating your gestures into fine motor control , hence the longevity of the invention.What you are saying is ; do n't try to make one , I did n't like the last one I tried !
We all know the best input method is telepathically .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt you could fit a keyboard inside that thing, I mean... it's so tiny!You see, what you whine about is old technology, what you saw, was a presentation made by the marketing crew using a flash animation.OCR when implemented correctly with good algorithms and combined with a fast cpu can be very efficient, not as fast as writing on a keyboard, but that's a sacrifice you have to make for downsizing.
A pen is perfect for touching delicate things and mediating your gestures into fine motor control, hence the longevity of the invention.What you are saying is; don't try to make one, I didn't like the last one I tried!
We all know the best input method is telepathically.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376680</id>
	<title>Re:Courier?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267790040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=never+use+comic+sans" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">Never use Comic Sans!</a> [google.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Never use Comic Sans !
[ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never use Comic Sans!
[google.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377112</id>
	<title>Re:Courier?</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1267793460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What if I want a Comic Sans?</p></div>
</blockquote><p>Call the suicide hotline, or avoid mentioning your desire for the font whose name we don't speak of.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What if I want a Comic Sans ?
Call the suicide hotline , or avoid mentioning your desire for the font whose name we do n't speak of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if I want a Comic Sans?
Call the suicide hotline, or avoid mentioning your desire for the font whose name we don't speak of.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377238</id>
	<title>Can't believe i'm saying this..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267794600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really don't like Microsoft, but...<br>I'd love to see MS kick Apple's ass this time around just to wipe that smug look off Jobs' face - the guy is too cocky.</p><p>AC</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really do n't like Microsoft , but...I 'd love to see MS kick Apple 's ass this time around just to wipe that smug look off Jobs ' face - the guy is too cocky.AC</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really don't like Microsoft, but...I'd love to see MS kick Apple's ass this time around just to wipe that smug look off Jobs' face - the guy is too cocky.AC</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377082</id>
	<title>Re:I'm Wary of Microsoft.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267793160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>they profit at the expense of their consumers</p></div><p>Doesn't everybody? Maybe I missed something in ECON-101 but I thought that was the point of capitalism.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>they profit at the expense of their consumersDoes n't everybody ?
Maybe I missed something in ECON-101 but I thought that was the point of capitalism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they profit at the expense of their consumersDoesn't everybody?
Maybe I missed something in ECON-101 but I thought that was the point of capitalism.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31379786</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong link</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267874580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>"There's no way I'll be buying the locked down tablet-like iPad when this is coming up."<br> <br>

Well at least MS scored a direct hit with one sucker. Announcing a product still in its initial concept phase has one and only one purpose: to prevent you from buying a competitor's product long enough for them to develop something that might compete. <br> <br>

Some day your dreams may come true. I wish you luck.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" There 's no way I 'll be buying the locked down tablet-like iPad when this is coming up .
" Well at least MS scored a direct hit with one sucker .
Announcing a product still in its initial concept phase has one and only one purpose : to prevent you from buying a competitor 's product long enough for them to develop something that might compete .
Some day your dreams may come true .
I wish you luck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"There's no way I'll be buying the locked down tablet-like iPad when this is coming up.
" 

Well at least MS scored a direct hit with one sucker.
Announcing a product still in its initial concept phase has one and only one purpose: to prevent you from buying a competitor's product long enough for them to develop something that might compete.
Some day your dreams may come true.
I wish you luck.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376448</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376658
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377480
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376712
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31380176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31380236
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31379694
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378290
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377236
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31384730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31381178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31407806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31379074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31387964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377254
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31381146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31379684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31380366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377352
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31379786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31380414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31382196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_03_05_2014201_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31379922
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_2014201.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377702
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_2014201.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378062
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_2014201.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378146
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_2014201.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31380366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31407806
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_2014201.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376982
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378558
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376712
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376556
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377236
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_2014201.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376686
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_2014201.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377126
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_2014201.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31379074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31384730
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376854
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31380414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376848
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377918
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_2014201.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377586
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376886
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_2014201.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31379922
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377352
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_2014201.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31381146
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_2014201.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376610
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376582
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377186
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31379694
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376796
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31380176
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_2014201.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31380236
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_2014201.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376658
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_2014201.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376924
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_2014201.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376632
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_2014201.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376860
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_2014201.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31381178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31382196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378456
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378144
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31379684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31377480
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31378290
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_03_05_2014201.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376844
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31387964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31376858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_03_05_2014201.31379786
</commentlist>
</conversation>
