<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_26_1832240</id>
	<title>California Legislature Declares "Cuss-Free" Week</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1267172160000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>shewfig writes <i>"The California legislature, which previously <a href="//politics.slashdot.org/story/07/01/31/1826230/California-Proposes-to-Ban-Incandescent-Lightbulbs">tried to ban incandescent light bulbs</a>, just added to the list of banned things ... <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/ci\_14470806?source=most\_viewed">swear words</a>!  Fortunately, the measure only applies for the first week of March, and compliance is voluntary &mdash; although, apparently, there will be a 'swear jar' in the Assembly and the Governor's mansion.  No word yet on whether <a href="//idle.slashdot.org/story/09/10/29/1429235/Schwarzenegger-Flips-Off-Lawmakers">the Governator</a> intends to comply."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>shewfig writes " The California legislature , which previously tried to ban incandescent light bulbs , just added to the list of banned things ... swear words !
Fortunately , the measure only applies for the first week of March , and compliance is voluntary    although , apparently , there will be a 'swear jar ' in the Assembly and the Governor 's mansion .
No word yet on whether the Governator intends to comply .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>shewfig writes "The California legislature, which previously tried to ban incandescent light bulbs, just added to the list of banned things ... swear words!
Fortunately, the measure only applies for the first week of March, and compliance is voluntary — although, apparently, there will be a 'swear jar' in the Assembly and the Governor's mansion.
No word yet on whether the Governator intends to comply.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31317204</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck you, asshole</title>
	<author>LanMan04</author>
	<datestamp>1267462980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought it was "Give me your clothes, your boots, and your motorcycle."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought it was " Give me your clothes , your boots , and your motorcycle .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought it was "Give me your clothes, your boots, and your motorcycle.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31312056</id>
	<title>Re:What's wrong swith cuss words?</title>
	<author>Macgrrl</author>
	<datestamp>1267379580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most societies have concepts which are taboo. Many of these revolve around bodily function. The social convention is that you don't do or discuss these things in public.</p><p>What is society really, but a series of rules that allow us to occupy a small space together without killing each other.</p><p>Taboos evolve with society, most people today would be more confortable discussing their sex life than their paycheck. Money itself is now considered obscene.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most societies have concepts which are taboo .
Many of these revolve around bodily function .
The social convention is that you do n't do or discuss these things in public.What is society really , but a series of rules that allow us to occupy a small space together without killing each other.Taboos evolve with society , most people today would be more confortable discussing their sex life than their paycheck .
Money itself is now considered obscene .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most societies have concepts which are taboo.
Many of these revolve around bodily function.
The social convention is that you don't do or discuss these things in public.What is society really, but a series of rules that allow us to occupy a small space together without killing each other.Taboos evolve with society, most people today would be more confortable discussing their sex life than their paycheck.
Money itself is now considered obscene.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290694</id>
	<title>I've seen this before..</title>
	<author>Pinky</author>
	<datestamp>1267179240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The next step is to put a little box on the wall with speech recognition. Then it could print out a fine automatically..</p><p>".. you have been fined 1 credit for a violation of the verbal morality..."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The next step is to put a little box on the wall with speech recognition .
Then it could print out a fine automatically.. " .. you have been fined 1 credit for a violation of the verbal morality... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The next step is to put a little box on the wall with speech recognition.
Then it could print out a fine automatically..".. you have been fined 1 credit for a violation of the verbal morality..."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291130</id>
	<title>Re:Of course</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267181460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know, I think you're fucking right...</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , I think you 're fucking right.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, I think you're fucking right...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290476</id>
	<title>Acrostic</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1267178100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Should be interesting.<br>
Have they considered there are many ways one can curse?<br>
I suspect they have not<br>
Totally ineffectual law if you ask me.<br>
A law on being polite? Workable? No...what's the word I am looking for?<br>
Best.<br>
Law.<br>
Ever.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Should be interesting .
Have they considered there are many ways one can curse ?
I suspect they have not Totally ineffectual law if you ask me .
A law on being polite ?
Workable ? No...what 's the word I am looking for ?
Best . Law .
Ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Should be interesting.
Have they considered there are many ways one can curse?
I suspect they have not
Totally ineffectual law if you ask me.
A law on being polite?
Workable? No...what's the word I am looking for?
Best.
Law.
Ever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290308</id>
	<title>Does anyone have the text of the resolution?</title>
	<author>NotQuiteReal</author>
	<datestamp>1267177440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I didn't look too hard, but I couldn't find the text.
<br>
<br>
If it was written by lawmakers, it should be long and rambling, and I am hoping to find the list of proscribed words, otherwise how will I know if I am in compliance?
<br>
<br>
Or are they just sticking to the classics; Shit, Piss, Fuck, Cunt, Cocksucker, Motherfucker, and Tits.
<br>
<br>
Tits? seriously? Piss doesn't seem like a swear word anymore either.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't look too hard , but I could n't find the text .
If it was written by lawmakers , it should be long and rambling , and I am hoping to find the list of proscribed words , otherwise how will I know if I am in compliance ?
Or are they just sticking to the classics ; Shit , Piss , Fuck , Cunt , Cocksucker , Motherfucker , and Tits .
Tits ? seriously ?
Piss does n't seem like a swear word anymore either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't look too hard, but I couldn't find the text.
If it was written by lawmakers, it should be long and rambling, and I am hoping to find the list of proscribed words, otherwise how will I know if I am in compliance?
Or are they just sticking to the classics; Shit, Piss, Fuck, Cunt, Cocksucker, Motherfucker, and Tits.
Tits? seriously?
Piss doesn't seem like a swear word anymore either.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292446</id>
	<title>Re:What's wrong swith cuss words?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267188660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, like, what you're, like, saying is that, like, "like" should be, like, a cuss word? Like, am I right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , like , what you 're , like , saying is that , like , " like " should be , like , a cuss word ?
Like , am I right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, like, what you're, like, saying is that, like, "like" should be, like, a cuss word?
Like, am I right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290142</id>
	<title>This is such bullshit.</title>
	<author>jbarr</author>
	<datestamp>1267176600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Subject says it all!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Subject says it all !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Subject says it all!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292212</id>
	<title>Fsck swearing</title>
	<author>jamesh</author>
	<datestamp>1267187400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fsck swearing... I want to hear them go a whole month (or even an hour) without saying any word starting with the letter 's' or something creative like that. The person that breaks the rule the most gets to sit on one of those seats over a tub of water that you throw tennis balls at a target and if you hit it dumps them in. Or even better, a bucket of slime over everyone's head that gets poured on them whenever they say "I don't know".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fsck swearing... I want to hear them go a whole month ( or even an hour ) without saying any word starting with the letter 's ' or something creative like that .
The person that breaks the rule the most gets to sit on one of those seats over a tub of water that you throw tennis balls at a target and if you hit it dumps them in .
Or even better , a bucket of slime over everyone 's head that gets poured on them whenever they say " I do n't know " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fsck swearing... I want to hear them go a whole month (or even an hour) without saying any word starting with the letter 's' or something creative like that.
The person that breaks the rule the most gets to sit on one of those seats over a tub of water that you throw tennis balls at a target and if you hit it dumps them in.
Or even better, a bucket of slime over everyone's head that gets poured on them whenever they say "I don't know".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291120</id>
	<title>Ok Seriously...</title>
	<author>tengeta</author>
	<datestamp>1267181400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>California, this is the point where you stand up and tell your government that they will walk out of their buildings jobless or lose their lives.</htmltext>
<tokenext>California , this is the point where you stand up and tell your government that they will walk out of their buildings jobless or lose their lives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>California, this is the point where you stand up and tell your government that they will walk out of their buildings jobless or lose their lives.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294204</id>
	<title>Re:What's wrong swith cuss words?</title>
	<author>LordLucless</author>
	<datestamp>1267201260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Etymologically, in English, the distinction was class-based. Swear words generally have Germanic roots (fuck, shit, etc), while the clinical terms (copulate, excrete) have French/Romantic roots. At the time English as a language was developing, Germanic was considered barbarous, and French/Latin was considered cultured. Language is often one of the hallmarks of social groups (think of the vocabulary shift between generations - hip, groovy, cool, etc). If you want to fit in to a particular group, one of the first things you do is adopt the linguistic mannerisms of the group. Our society, as we have become more egalitarian, has tended to adopt "high culture" artefacts in preference to "low culture", so we've essentially inherited those manerisms, and relegated low culture to vulgarity.<br>
<br>
Personally, my reaction to swear words varies in regards to context. The most common useage I see is generally people who use them deliberately to shock, or to show how much of a rebel they are by not conforming to social acceptable behaviour. I'm not offended by that, but I don't have much respect for the speaker.<br>
<br>Similarly, I see cathartic profanity ("Shit! The server's down") as indecision, or a lack of self control. When I hear this at work, it generally means something's gone wrong, and someone's standing around swearing instead of actually trying to fix it. The competent people don't usually swear when something happens, they act immediately to correct it.<br>
<br>
Emphatic swearing ("Fucking awesome"), I don't really mind, but don't particularly see a point to it either.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Etymologically , in English , the distinction was class-based .
Swear words generally have Germanic roots ( fuck , shit , etc ) , while the clinical terms ( copulate , excrete ) have French/Romantic roots .
At the time English as a language was developing , Germanic was considered barbarous , and French/Latin was considered cultured .
Language is often one of the hallmarks of social groups ( think of the vocabulary shift between generations - hip , groovy , cool , etc ) .
If you want to fit in to a particular group , one of the first things you do is adopt the linguistic mannerisms of the group .
Our society , as we have become more egalitarian , has tended to adopt " high culture " artefacts in preference to " low culture " , so we 've essentially inherited those manerisms , and relegated low culture to vulgarity .
Personally , my reaction to swear words varies in regards to context .
The most common useage I see is generally people who use them deliberately to shock , or to show how much of a rebel they are by not conforming to social acceptable behaviour .
I 'm not offended by that , but I do n't have much respect for the speaker .
Similarly , I see cathartic profanity ( " Shit !
The server 's down " ) as indecision , or a lack of self control .
When I hear this at work , it generally means something 's gone wrong , and someone 's standing around swearing instead of actually trying to fix it .
The competent people do n't usually swear when something happens , they act immediately to correct it .
Emphatic swearing ( " Fucking awesome " ) , I do n't really mind , but do n't particularly see a point to it either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Etymologically, in English, the distinction was class-based.
Swear words generally have Germanic roots (fuck, shit, etc), while the clinical terms (copulate, excrete) have French/Romantic roots.
At the time English as a language was developing, Germanic was considered barbarous, and French/Latin was considered cultured.
Language is often one of the hallmarks of social groups (think of the vocabulary shift between generations - hip, groovy, cool, etc).
If you want to fit in to a particular group, one of the first things you do is adopt the linguistic mannerisms of the group.
Our society, as we have become more egalitarian, has tended to adopt "high culture" artefacts in preference to "low culture", so we've essentially inherited those manerisms, and relegated low culture to vulgarity.
Personally, my reaction to swear words varies in regards to context.
The most common useage I see is generally people who use them deliberately to shock, or to show how much of a rebel they are by not conforming to social acceptable behaviour.
I'm not offended by that, but I don't have much respect for the speaker.
Similarly, I see cathartic profanity ("Shit!
The server's down") as indecision, or a lack of self control.
When I hear this at work, it generally means something's gone wrong, and someone's standing around swearing instead of actually trying to fix it.
The competent people don't usually swear when something happens, they act immediately to correct it.
Emphatic swearing ("Fucking awesome"), I don't really mind, but don't particularly see a point to it either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289956</id>
	<title>CA must be on easy street</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267175820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>what a fucking waste of time</htmltext>
<tokenext>what a fucking waste of time</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what a fucking waste of time</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31323150</id>
	<title>Re:The obligatory</title>
	<author>BoozeRunner</author>
	<datestamp>1267442160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&amp; refrencing the most veritile word in the english language . .<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.<br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l\_PkJ\_4oEjc" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Usage of the word F**K</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>&amp; refrencing the most veritile word in the english language .
. .
Usage of the word F * * K [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&amp; refrencing the most veritile word in the english language .
. .
Usage of the word F**K [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291454</id>
	<title>state motto</title>
	<author>strikeleader</author>
	<datestamp>1267183320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>California&rsquo;s new state motto: <br>
Leading the way down the spiraling toilet of liberal legislation</htmltext>
<tokenext>California    s new state motto : Leading the way down the spiraling toilet of liberal legislation</tokentext>
<sentencetext>California’s new state motto: 
Leading the way down the spiraling toilet of liberal legislation</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292202</id>
	<title>Re:What's wrong swith cuss words?</title>
	<author>BaronHethorSamedi</author>
	<datestamp>1267187400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm glad you brought this up.  Let me turn this question around a bit.<br>
<br>
I'm not actively offended by profanity.  I grew up with it, hear it at work, in the media--about like we all do, I suppose.  But even if I'm not actively offended by it, I'm not actively impressed by it either.  Are you?<br>
<br>
I suppose I may have had a bit of a "brainwashed upbringing" in that I had parents who were concerned that I learn to speak English well and communicate effectively.  English is a language with an extraordinarily broad and varied vocabulary--in part because it's borrowed so heavily from so many other languages.  When I hear a person who seems unable to construct a sentence without using four letter words--for whom "fuck" and its variants act as noun, adjective, pronoun and/or verb without any apparent notion of what that word actually denotes--I admit that at first blush I'm probably going to have a low opinion of that person.  If I were an employer, I wouldn't hire him or her.  I wouldn't want him or her dating one of my children.<br>
<br>
I share your sentiment on "like" as a placeholder (I'm not too impressed by that either), but feel that even that is probably preferable to pointless (and invariably grammatically incorrect) references to sexual acts, excrement, and religious figures.  And if you're making those references with a purpose to offend, are you really trying to communicate anything useful anyway?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm glad you brought this up .
Let me turn this question around a bit .
I 'm not actively offended by profanity .
I grew up with it , hear it at work , in the media--about like we all do , I suppose .
But even if I 'm not actively offended by it , I 'm not actively impressed by it either .
Are you ?
I suppose I may have had a bit of a " brainwashed upbringing " in that I had parents who were concerned that I learn to speak English well and communicate effectively .
English is a language with an extraordinarily broad and varied vocabulary--in part because it 's borrowed so heavily from so many other languages .
When I hear a person who seems unable to construct a sentence without using four letter words--for whom " fuck " and its variants act as noun , adjective , pronoun and/or verb without any apparent notion of what that word actually denotes--I admit that at first blush I 'm probably going to have a low opinion of that person .
If I were an employer , I would n't hire him or her .
I would n't want him or her dating one of my children .
I share your sentiment on " like " as a placeholder ( I 'm not too impressed by that either ) , but feel that even that is probably preferable to pointless ( and invariably grammatically incorrect ) references to sexual acts , excrement , and religious figures .
And if you 're making those references with a purpose to offend , are you really trying to communicate anything useful anyway ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm glad you brought this up.
Let me turn this question around a bit.
I'm not actively offended by profanity.
I grew up with it, hear it at work, in the media--about like we all do, I suppose.
But even if I'm not actively offended by it, I'm not actively impressed by it either.
Are you?
I suppose I may have had a bit of a "brainwashed upbringing" in that I had parents who were concerned that I learn to speak English well and communicate effectively.
English is a language with an extraordinarily broad and varied vocabulary--in part because it's borrowed so heavily from so many other languages.
When I hear a person who seems unable to construct a sentence without using four letter words--for whom "fuck" and its variants act as noun, adjective, pronoun and/or verb without any apparent notion of what that word actually denotes--I admit that at first blush I'm probably going to have a low opinion of that person.
If I were an employer, I wouldn't hire him or her.
I wouldn't want him or her dating one of my children.
I share your sentiment on "like" as a placeholder (I'm not too impressed by that either), but feel that even that is probably preferable to pointless (and invariably grammatically incorrect) references to sexual acts, excrement, and religious figures.
And if you're making those references with a purpose to offend, are you really trying to communicate anything useful anyway?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292362</id>
	<title>Fuck the government of California</title>
	<author>AthleteMusicianNerd</author>
	<datestamp>1267188120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>People take this all as a joke, but the income tax started out at 1\% and rose as high as 90\%.  This is what's called incrementalism.  It's just a matter of time before they do punish people for cursing.
<br>
Of course excessive use of curse words gets annoying, but anyone offended by it needs to chill.  The word fuck is synonymous with fornicate.  Why is the former offensive and the latter not?  Likewise with cunt and vagina, cock and penis, asshole and anus, etc....
<br>
When this "no cuss week" comes up, I am going to stand in the middle of the Spectrum and yell "Fuck" which is something I wouldn't have otherwise done.  So they have in fact made the problem worse by coming up with this crap.  I may even have a sign made saying "Fuck the CA State Assembly" and perhaps "Fuck Boxer and Feinstein" (but not literally) because they're both worthless cuntbags.</htmltext>
<tokenext>People take this all as a joke , but the income tax started out at 1 \ % and rose as high as 90 \ % .
This is what 's called incrementalism .
It 's just a matter of time before they do punish people for cursing .
Of course excessive use of curse words gets annoying , but anyone offended by it needs to chill .
The word fuck is synonymous with fornicate .
Why is the former offensive and the latter not ?
Likewise with cunt and vagina , cock and penis , asshole and anus , etc... . When this " no cuss week " comes up , I am going to stand in the middle of the Spectrum and yell " Fuck " which is something I would n't have otherwise done .
So they have in fact made the problem worse by coming up with this crap .
I may even have a sign made saying " Fuck the CA State Assembly " and perhaps " Fuck Boxer and Feinstein " ( but not literally ) because they 're both worthless cuntbags .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People take this all as a joke, but the income tax started out at 1\% and rose as high as 90\%.
This is what's called incrementalism.
It's just a matter of time before they do punish people for cursing.
Of course excessive use of curse words gets annoying, but anyone offended by it needs to chill.
The word fuck is synonymous with fornicate.
Why is the former offensive and the latter not?
Likewise with cunt and vagina, cock and penis, asshole and anus, etc....

When this "no cuss week" comes up, I am going to stand in the middle of the Spectrum and yell "Fuck" which is something I wouldn't have otherwise done.
So they have in fact made the problem worse by coming up with this crap.
I may even have a sign made saying "Fuck the CA State Assembly" and perhaps "Fuck Boxer and Feinstein" (but not literally) because they're both worthless cuntbags.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31296392</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds OK to me</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1267282500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>One of my favorite definitions of courtesy is "acting so that those around you are most comfortable".</p></div><p>I'm most comfortable when I get to say "fuck" frequently. I toss it into my verbiage like croutons on a fat man's salad. (And I am all too-well acquainted with this portion of reality.) Where are the people concerned about my level of comfort when they try to restrict my speech? My Amygdala requires frequent exercise, and utterance of expletives is part of that.</p><p>I'm also most comfortable when I'm naked, but we won't even go into that...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of my favorite definitions of courtesy is " acting so that those around you are most comfortable " .I 'm most comfortable when I get to say " fuck " frequently .
I toss it into my verbiage like croutons on a fat man 's salad .
( And I am all too-well acquainted with this portion of reality .
) Where are the people concerned about my level of comfort when they try to restrict my speech ?
My Amygdala requires frequent exercise , and utterance of expletives is part of that.I 'm also most comfortable when I 'm naked , but we wo n't even go into that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of my favorite definitions of courtesy is "acting so that those around you are most comfortable".I'm most comfortable when I get to say "fuck" frequently.
I toss it into my verbiage like croutons on a fat man's salad.
(And I am all too-well acquainted with this portion of reality.
) Where are the people concerned about my level of comfort when they try to restrict my speech?
My Amygdala requires frequent exercise, and utterance of expletives is part of that.I'm also most comfortable when I'm naked, but we won't even go into that...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290744</id>
	<title>I like the saying:</title>
	<author>Shatteredstar</author>
	<datestamp>1267179420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The censorship of the word is what gives it power.</p><p>Somewhat true really, if the word was mainstream and not something people were shocked or suprised to hear, it would not be something people would need to hide or shelter others from.</p><p>On a similar line of thought....why do we use a word for certain things?  Because at some point someone decided that word would mean that.  Subjective by person</p><p>An apple might be called a quazar, a fish might be a globbitygook...all based on who decided to name that thing however long ago really, at least thats my view on the whole of language.  (just look at how each language has different words for various things!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The censorship of the word is what gives it power.Somewhat true really , if the word was mainstream and not something people were shocked or suprised to hear , it would not be something people would need to hide or shelter others from.On a similar line of thought....why do we use a word for certain things ?
Because at some point someone decided that word would mean that .
Subjective by personAn apple might be called a quazar , a fish might be a globbitygook...all based on who decided to name that thing however long ago really , at least thats my view on the whole of language .
( just look at how each language has different words for various things !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The censorship of the word is what gives it power.Somewhat true really, if the word was mainstream and not something people were shocked or suprised to hear, it would not be something people would need to hide or shelter others from.On a similar line of thought....why do we use a word for certain things?
Because at some point someone decided that word would mean that.
Subjective by personAn apple might be called a quazar, a fish might be a globbitygook...all based on who decided to name that thing however long ago really, at least thats my view on the whole of language.
(just look at how each language has different words for various things!
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290386</id>
	<title>Re:CA must be on easy street</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267177800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stop fucking swearing you goddamn ass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stop fucking swearing you goddamn ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stop fucking swearing you goddamn ass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290034</id>
	<title>God damn idiots</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267176180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
The motherfuckas in CA legislature, and I apologize all the genuine mofos for the insult of comparison, cannot pass a budget or anything minutely useful.
</p><p>
Just the other day, they were passing (passed?) setting up a registry for "animal collectors" - people who collect large number of stray cats and such.
</p><p>
God damn state is going down the drain with 12\% unemployment rate, and these are the things the fuckers fiddle with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The motherfuckas in CA legislature , and I apologize all the genuine mofos for the insult of comparison , can not pass a budget or anything minutely useful .
Just the other day , they were passing ( passed ?
) setting up a registry for " animal collectors " - people who collect large number of stray cats and such .
God damn state is going down the drain with 12 \ % unemployment rate , and these are the things the fuckers fiddle with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
The motherfuckas in CA legislature, and I apologize all the genuine mofos for the insult of comparison, cannot pass a budget or anything minutely useful.
Just the other day, they were passing (passed?
) setting up a registry for "animal collectors" - people who collect large number of stray cats and such.
God damn state is going down the drain with 12\% unemployment rate, and these are the things the fuckers fiddle with.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291012</id>
	<title>Kid who started the no cussing club</title>
	<author>unjedai</author>
	<datestamp>1267180680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>About the kid mentioned in the article that started the <a href="https://beta.lds.org/youth/from-every-nation/article/no-cussing-club?locale=eng" title="lds.org" rel="nofollow">no cussing club</a> [lds.org] </p><p><div class="quote"><p>"It hasn&rsquo;t all been smooth sailing. At first, McKay almost quit because of negative response. Sometimes people would yell bad words at him. Or they would accuse him of trying to take away their freedom of speech. McKay points out that he isn&rsquo;t making them do anything. He asks them to challenge themselves to improve. &ldquo;I&rsquo;m just trying to bring awareness about people&rsquo;s language.&rdquo;</p></div><p>
In the accompanying video it says he's gotten death threats. Some people need to chill out.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>About the kid mentioned in the article that started the no cussing club [ lds.org ] " It hasn    t all been smooth sailing .
At first , McKay almost quit because of negative response .
Sometimes people would yell bad words at him .
Or they would accuse him of trying to take away their freedom of speech .
McKay points out that he isn    t making them do anything .
He asks them to challenge themselves to improve .
   I    m just trying to bring awareness about people    s language.    In the accompanying video it says he 's gotten death threats .
Some people need to chill out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>About the kid mentioned in the article that started the no cussing club [lds.org] "It hasn’t all been smooth sailing.
At first, McKay almost quit because of negative response.
Sometimes people would yell bad words at him.
Or they would accuse him of trying to take away their freedom of speech.
McKay points out that he isn’t making them do anything.
He asks them to challenge themselves to improve.
“I’m just trying to bring awareness about people’s language.”
In the accompanying video it says he's gotten death threats.
Some people need to chill out.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290848</id>
	<title>Re:Of course</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267179840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Maybe even all but one of the posts will contain cuss-words.</p></div><p>All but two, actually.</p><p>Not only that, but of course this story gets tagged "censorship", even though the whole point of this is to merely <i>ask</i> people not to swear for one week. Absolutely no enforcement whatsoever is happening.</p><p>(Cue the "...for now" comments in 3... 2... 1...)</p><p>Don't get me wrong, I think it's a silly waste of time, and I wonder if CA politicians don't have actual issues to attempt to address. But this is a huge non-story.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe even all but one of the posts will contain cuss-words.All but two , actually.Not only that , but of course this story gets tagged " censorship " , even though the whole point of this is to merely ask people not to swear for one week .
Absolutely no enforcement whatsoever is happening .
( Cue the " ...for now " comments in 3... 2... 1... ) Do n't get me wrong , I think it 's a silly waste of time , and I wonder if CA politicians do n't have actual issues to attempt to address .
But this is a huge non-story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe even all but one of the posts will contain cuss-words.All but two, actually.Not only that, but of course this story gets tagged "censorship", even though the whole point of this is to merely ask people not to swear for one week.
Absolutely no enforcement whatsoever is happening.
(Cue the "...for now" comments in 3... 2... 1...)Don't get me wrong, I think it's a silly waste of time, and I wonder if CA politicians don't have actual issues to attempt to address.
But this is a huge non-story.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290810</id>
	<title>Actually, I can see an upside</title>
	<author>weston</author>
	<datestamp>1267179660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Profanity often can nudge interaction towards less restrained and thoughtful expression. The budget didn't spiral out of control by itself; it broke down because of (a) the laws surrounding how budgeting is to be done (b) the fact that the two parties couldn't work with each other.</p><p>Discouraging profanity won't fix problem (a), but it might make problem (b) somewhat more tractable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Profanity often can nudge interaction towards less restrained and thoughtful expression .
The budget did n't spiral out of control by itself ; it broke down because of ( a ) the laws surrounding how budgeting is to be done ( b ) the fact that the two parties could n't work with each other.Discouraging profanity wo n't fix problem ( a ) , but it might make problem ( b ) somewhat more tractable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Profanity often can nudge interaction towards less restrained and thoughtful expression.
The budget didn't spiral out of control by itself; it broke down because of (a) the laws surrounding how budgeting is to be done (b) the fact that the two parties couldn't work with each other.Discouraging profanity won't fix problem (a), but it might make problem (b) somewhat more tractable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31297510</id>
	<title>Re:CA must be on easy street</title>
	<author>BeanThere</author>
	<datestamp>1267294800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not just time, but money. Your tax dollars, hard at work, put to good use. That huge deficit is so justified. Isn't it time we voted out all this deadweight?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not just time , but money .
Your tax dollars , hard at work , put to good use .
That huge deficit is so justified .
Is n't it time we voted out all this deadweight ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not just time, but money.
Your tax dollars, hard at work, put to good use.
That huge deficit is so justified.
Isn't it time we voted out all this deadweight?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290024</id>
	<title>working hard...or</title>
	<author>TornCityVenz</author>
	<datestamp>1267176180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good to see that with schools going down the toilet, a budget spirally out of control and more and more companies moving out of the area...the legislature is hard at work.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good to see that with schools going down the toilet , a budget spirally out of control and more and more companies moving out of the area...the legislature is hard at work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good to see that with schools going down the toilet, a budget spirally out of control and more and more companies moving out of the area...the legislature is hard at work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31299418</id>
	<title>hmmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267263300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone should rent a van with huge speakers and drive around town with a tape of non-stop profanity, just to make things interesting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone should rent a van with huge speakers and drive around town with a tape of non-stop profanity , just to make things interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone should rent a van with huge speakers and drive around town with a tape of non-stop profanity, just to make things interesting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291528</id>
	<title>I sir, point to Amendment 1....</title>
	<author>Fallen Kell</author>
	<datestamp>1267183800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And say you can stick your fucking no swear week up your fucking ass...</htmltext>
<tokenext>And say you can stick your fucking no swear week up your fucking ass.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And say you can stick your fucking no swear week up your fucking ass...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290000</id>
	<title>Joke?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267176060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>God damn this shit must be a fucking joke? We don't cuss in California!</htmltext>
<tokenext>God damn this shit must be a fucking joke ?
We do n't cuss in California !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>God damn this shit must be a fucking joke?
We don't cuss in California!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294554</id>
	<title>Re:What's wrong swith cuss words?</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1267204860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the real answer is class identity.  It's a good idea to emulate the "upper classes" so you might be confused for a member and thereby potentially gain entry to the gentry.  By using the idioms of the "lower classes" you allow yourself to be grouped into that group: just having a differentiation is enough to reinforce classism.</p><p>I remember in grade school being admonished for a cussing related incident (the details of which are simultaneously weird and super boring), and the words involved were described to me as "Vulgar."  The world "vulgar" was new to me at the time as well, but after learning more about its various definitions, I think that it is actually the most apt description of cuss words I have yet heard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the real answer is class identity .
It 's a good idea to emulate the " upper classes " so you might be confused for a member and thereby potentially gain entry to the gentry .
By using the idioms of the " lower classes " you allow yourself to be grouped into that group : just having a differentiation is enough to reinforce classism.I remember in grade school being admonished for a cussing related incident ( the details of which are simultaneously weird and super boring ) , and the words involved were described to me as " Vulgar .
" The world " vulgar " was new to me at the time as well , but after learning more about its various definitions , I think that it is actually the most apt description of cuss words I have yet heard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the real answer is class identity.
It's a good idea to emulate the "upper classes" so you might be confused for a member and thereby potentially gain entry to the gentry.
By using the idioms of the "lower classes" you allow yourself to be grouped into that group: just having a differentiation is enough to reinforce classism.I remember in grade school being admonished for a cussing related incident (the details of which are simultaneously weird and super boring), and the words involved were described to me as "Vulgar.
"  The world "vulgar" was new to me at the time as well, but after learning more about its various definitions, I think that it is actually the most apt description of cuss words I have yet heard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31295574</id>
	<title>Lent for swearing</title>
	<author>Mal-2</author>
	<datestamp>1267263840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since this vaguely resembles Lent, I think we should precede it with "Swear Like A Sailor" day on February 28 (or 29). I bet this inversion would prove more popular than the original event, just like most people going to Mardi Gras have no interest in Lent, just the massive party.</p><p>Mal-2</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since this vaguely resembles Lent , I think we should precede it with " Swear Like A Sailor " day on February 28 ( or 29 ) .
I bet this inversion would prove more popular than the original event , just like most people going to Mardi Gras have no interest in Lent , just the massive party.Mal-2</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since this vaguely resembles Lent, I think we should precede it with "Swear Like A Sailor" day on February 28 (or 29).
I bet this inversion would prove more popular than the original event, just like most people going to Mardi Gras have no interest in Lent, just the massive party.Mal-2</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31295514</id>
	<title>Re:CA must be on easy street</title>
	<author>TheVelvetFlamebait</author>
	<datestamp>1267262160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fuck you. We can take care of ourselves. Cunt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck you .
We can take care of ourselves .
Cunt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck you.
We can take care of ourselves.
Cunt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290636</id>
	<title>Shades of "Demolition Man"</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1267178940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Give them at ticket every time they swear, and at least they'll have something to wipe their ass with!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Give them at ticket every time they swear , and at least they 'll have something to wipe their ass with !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give them at ticket every time they swear, and at least they'll have something to wipe their ass with!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290440</id>
	<title>Re:CA must be on easy street</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267177980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>California?  As in:<br><br>"For some time now I have lamented the fact that major issues are overlooked while many<br>Unnecessary bills come to me for consideration.    Water reform, prison reform, and health<br>Care are major issues my Administration has brought to the table, but the Legislature just<br>Kicks the can down the alley.<br><br>Yet another legislative year has come and gone without the major reforms Californians<br>Overwhelmingly deserve. In light of this, and after careful consideration, I believe it is<br>Unnecessary to sign this measure at this time."</htmltext>
<tokenext>California ?
As in : " For some time now I have lamented the fact that major issues are overlooked while manyUnnecessary bills come to me for consideration .
Water reform , prison reform , and healthCare are major issues my Administration has brought to the table , but the Legislature justKicks the can down the alley.Yet another legislative year has come and gone without the major reforms CaliforniansOverwhelmingly deserve .
In light of this , and after careful consideration , I believe it isUnnecessary to sign this measure at this time .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>California?
As in:"For some time now I have lamented the fact that major issues are overlooked while manyUnnecessary bills come to me for consideration.
Water reform, prison reform, and healthCare are major issues my Administration has brought to the table, but the Legislature justKicks the can down the alley.Yet another legislative year has come and gone without the major reforms CaliforniansOverwhelmingly deserve.
In light of this, and after careful consideration, I believe it isUnnecessary to sign this measure at this time.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290766</id>
	<title>In CA now.</title>
	<author>bragr</author>
	<datestamp>1267179540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>More specifically, I am sitting in a lecture hall of the University of California system that is starting to shown the signs of underfunding.
So... fuck that that goddamn shit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>More specifically , I am sitting in a lecture hall of the University of California system that is starting to shown the signs of underfunding .
So... fuck that that goddamn shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More specifically, I am sitting in a lecture hall of the University of California system that is starting to shown the signs of underfunding.
So... fuck that that goddamn shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31293924</id>
	<title>Wait...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267198320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Am I stupid, or just confused? In the Governator's mansion, without the Governator's express permission?</p><p>I've seen enough Terminator to see how this one ends...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I stupid , or just confused ?
In the Governator 's mansion , without the Governator 's express permission ? I 've seen enough Terminator to see how this one ends.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I stupid, or just confused?
In the Governator's mansion, without the Governator's express permission?I've seen enough Terminator to see how this one ends...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290752</id>
	<title>Obligatory: Swears for Cares!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267179480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>See the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2CUzTy6t9E#t=20s" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">YouTube video</a> [youtube.com] (starts at 20 seconds).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>See the YouTube video [ youtube.com ] ( starts at 20 seconds ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See the YouTube video [youtube.com] (starts at 20 seconds).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292736</id>
	<title>Re:Voluntary....</title>
	<author>khallow</author>
	<datestamp>1267190400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You just wanted to show off your sig.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You just wanted to show off your sig .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You just wanted to show off your sig.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290542</id>
	<title>With the California state budget as it is...</title>
	<author>Neanderthal Ninny</author>
	<datestamp>1267178400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>good luck. Furlough Fridays, closing state parks, etc and "Cuss-Free" would take an Act of God.<br>I'll be back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>good luck .
Furlough Fridays , closing state parks , etc and " Cuss-Free " would take an Act of God.I 'll be back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>good luck.
Furlough Fridays, closing state parks, etc and "Cuss-Free" would take an Act of God.I'll be back.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292726</id>
	<title>So you can now swear</title>
	<author>houghi</author>
	<datestamp>1267190400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, at least the rest of the year. Look at the positive side. As it is banned only one week, it means that it is allowed 51 weeks. This would mean that if they allow things to be bleeped out on TV, your rights are violated.</p><p>So in order to not have cursing on tv, they better not do this and allow swearing all year around, so they can keep blocking it.</p><p>Now my head hurts. I am confused.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , at least the rest of the year .
Look at the positive side .
As it is banned only one week , it means that it is allowed 51 weeks .
This would mean that if they allow things to be bleeped out on TV , your rights are violated.So in order to not have cursing on tv , they better not do this and allow swearing all year around , so they can keep blocking it.Now my head hurts .
I am confused .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, at least the rest of the year.
Look at the positive side.
As it is banned only one week, it means that it is allowed 51 weeks.
This would mean that if they allow things to be bleeped out on TV, your rights are violated.So in order to not have cursing on tv, they better not do this and allow swearing all year around, so they can keep blocking it.Now my head hurts.
I am confused.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290846</id>
	<title>Re:CA must be on easy street</title>
	<author>mmontour</author>
	<datestamp>1267179840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><b>WARNING: This thread contains words known to the State of California to cause offense and hurt feelings or other psychological harm.</b></p><p>Please ensure that future discussions on this topic are RoHL (reduction of harsh language) compliant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WARNING : This thread contains words known to the State of California to cause offense and hurt feelings or other psychological harm.Please ensure that future discussions on this topic are RoHL ( reduction of harsh language ) compliant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WARNING: This thread contains words known to the State of California to cause offense and hurt feelings or other psychological harm.Please ensure that future discussions on this topic are RoHL (reduction of harsh language) compliant.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292176</id>
	<title>Wankers!</title>
	<author>nevillethedevil</author>
	<datestamp>1267187280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Knob</htmltext>
<tokenext>Knob</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Knob</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31295456</id>
	<title>Re:Of course</title>
	<author>zig007</author>
	<datestamp>1267261320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For all those non-americans that also have read the book and still don't get the parents joke, there is a reason:</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life,\_the\_Universe\_and\_Everything#Censorship" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life,\_the\_Universe\_and\_Everything#Censorship</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>Ironically, this joke would not have been possible would it not have been for the utter stupidity of profanity censorship.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For all those non-americans that also have read the book and still do n't get the parents joke , there is a reason : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life , \ _the \ _Universe \ _and \ _Everything # Censorship [ wikipedia.org ] Ironically , this joke would not have been possible would it not have been for the utter stupidity of profanity censorship .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For all those non-americans that also have read the book and still don't get the parents joke, there is a reason:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life,\_the\_Universe\_and\_Everything#Censorship [wikipedia.org]Ironically, this joke would not have been possible would it not have been for the utter stupidity of profanity censorship.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291358</id>
	<title>Re:What's wrong swith cuss words?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267182720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Japan doesn't even have "swear" words.  You can insult people very effectively if you want, but there are no words that offend in themselves.  I used to live with a Japanese woman with a little boy, he took to calling me "Oshiko head" but wouldn't tell me what it meant.  One day Mom was going on a long trip, taking the boy, and she asked him "You oshiko yet?".  He dutifully went to the bathroom to avoid having to make a special rest stop.</p><p>That's another thing, bathrooms used to be "water closets" until that became offensive, they used to be toilets, washroom, lavatory, latrine, head, WC, powder room, men's/ladies' room, can, and the ultimate in obfuscation, "rest room". I can assure you that I never visit one of these facilities in order to "rest"!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Japan does n't even have " swear " words .
You can insult people very effectively if you want , but there are no words that offend in themselves .
I used to live with a Japanese woman with a little boy , he took to calling me " Oshiko head " but would n't tell me what it meant .
One day Mom was going on a long trip , taking the boy , and she asked him " You oshiko yet ? " .
He dutifully went to the bathroom to avoid having to make a special rest stop.That 's another thing , bathrooms used to be " water closets " until that became offensive , they used to be toilets , washroom , lavatory , latrine , head , WC , powder room , men 's/ladies ' room , can , and the ultimate in obfuscation , " rest room " .
I can assure you that I never visit one of these facilities in order to " rest " !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Japan doesn't even have "swear" words.
You can insult people very effectively if you want, but there are no words that offend in themselves.
I used to live with a Japanese woman with a little boy, he took to calling me "Oshiko head" but wouldn't tell me what it meant.
One day Mom was going on a long trip, taking the boy, and she asked him "You oshiko yet?".
He dutifully went to the bathroom to avoid having to make a special rest stop.That's another thing, bathrooms used to be "water closets" until that became offensive, they used to be toilets, washroom, lavatory, latrine, head, WC, powder room, men's/ladies' room, can, and the ultimate in obfuscation, "rest room".
I can assure you that I never visit one of these facilities in order to "rest"!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290022</id>
	<title>Granola</title>
	<author>ArhcAngel</author>
	<datestamp>1267176180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fruits,<br>Nuts,<br>Flakes,<br>Pelosi<br>.<br>.<br>.<br>Profit?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fruits,Nuts,Flakes,Pelosi...Profit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fruits,Nuts,Flakes,Pelosi...Profit?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290118</id>
	<title>Just one thing, Dude...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267176540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do ya have to use so many cuss words?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do ya have to use so many cuss words ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do ya have to use so many cuss words?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290472</id>
	<title>Really?  I don't think it will be a problem.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267178100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The California legislature are just not familiar with the problem.</p><p>In any case, everyone can feel free to use this handy guide to help avoid foul language:<br><a href="http://www.mit.edu/activities/safe/humor/avoid-foul-language" title="mit.edu" rel="nofollow">http://www.mit.edu/activities/safe/humor/avoid-foul-language</a> [mit.edu]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The California legislature are just not familiar with the problem.In any case , everyone can feel free to use this handy guide to help avoid foul language : http : //www.mit.edu/activities/safe/humor/avoid-foul-language [ mit.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The California legislature are just not familiar with the problem.In any case, everyone can feel free to use this handy guide to help avoid foul language:http://www.mit.edu/activities/safe/humor/avoid-foul-language [mit.edu]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291670</id>
	<title>Re:What's wrong swith cuss words?</title>
	<author>SleazyRidr</author>
	<datestamp>1267184640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A large part of it is that they are used almost exclusively in a negative context. My girlfriend doesn't like me using what she calls 'ugly' words around her daughter. This includes words like 'stupid' and 'ugly.' She wants her daughter to grow up to be a nice person, and using nice words is the first step in that direction.</p><p>Granted, I often do swear without an offensive meaning (e.g. 'Fuck it's hot today') but young children probably won't pick up on the subtleties so she tries to keep them from her until she's older.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A large part of it is that they are used almost exclusively in a negative context .
My girlfriend does n't like me using what she calls 'ugly ' words around her daughter .
This includes words like 'stupid ' and 'ugly .
' She wants her daughter to grow up to be a nice person , and using nice words is the first step in that direction.Granted , I often do swear without an offensive meaning ( e.g .
'Fuck it 's hot today ' ) but young children probably wo n't pick up on the subtleties so she tries to keep them from her until she 's older .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A large part of it is that they are used almost exclusively in a negative context.
My girlfriend doesn't like me using what she calls 'ugly' words around her daughter.
This includes words like 'stupid' and 'ugly.
' She wants her daughter to grow up to be a nice person, and using nice words is the first step in that direction.Granted, I often do swear without an offensive meaning (e.g.
'Fuck it's hot today') but young children probably won't pick up on the subtleties so she tries to keep them from her until she's older.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31297120</id>
	<title>You missed one</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1267291200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Barbra Streisand</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Barbra Streisand</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Barbra Streisand</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31293218</id>
	<title>How does this work with Tourettes Syndrome?</title>
	<author>Kitkoan</author>
	<datestamp>1267193340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like this can be viewed as discriminatory against sufferers of Tourettes.</p><p>Does remind me of that one joke saying "If you don't believe in what I believe, and you deny Gosh then you'll be Darned to Heck".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like this can be viewed as discriminatory against sufferers of Tourettes.Does remind me of that one joke saying " If you do n't believe in what I believe , and you deny Gosh then you 'll be Darned to Heck " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like this can be viewed as discriminatory against sufferers of Tourettes.Does remind me of that one joke saying "If you don't believe in what I believe, and you deny Gosh then you'll be Darned to Heck".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318</id>
	<title>What's wrong swith cuss words?</title>
	<author>mikem170</author>
	<datestamp>1267177440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I often wonder why so many people are offended by cuss words...</p><p>What makes these words so different? Is it religion? Brainwashed upbringing that gets passed on? Is it a class thing? Act good around me or I'll assume you are bad? They are just words, after all. What is the real difference between poop and shit? Very awesome and fucking awesome?</p><p>At worst cuss words are a reflection on someone's poor vocabulary. At best they are colorful. I have a similar reaction to someone saying "like, I was, like, going to go, like, to the store and like this guy like said..." as I would to someone peppering their conversation wish unnecessary swear words.</p><p>I'd be curious to hear from those who is truly offended by cuss words. Why? What would be the problem with the FCC allowing cussing on TV during the day?</p><p>Just something I wonder about sometimes...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I often wonder why so many people are offended by cuss words...What makes these words so different ?
Is it religion ?
Brainwashed upbringing that gets passed on ?
Is it a class thing ?
Act good around me or I 'll assume you are bad ?
They are just words , after all .
What is the real difference between poop and shit ?
Very awesome and fucking awesome ? At worst cuss words are a reflection on someone 's poor vocabulary .
At best they are colorful .
I have a similar reaction to someone saying " like , I was , like , going to go , like , to the store and like this guy like said... " as I would to someone peppering their conversation wish unnecessary swear words.I 'd be curious to hear from those who is truly offended by cuss words .
Why ? What would be the problem with the FCC allowing cussing on TV during the day ? Just something I wonder about sometimes.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I often wonder why so many people are offended by cuss words...What makes these words so different?
Is it religion?
Brainwashed upbringing that gets passed on?
Is it a class thing?
Act good around me or I'll assume you are bad?
They are just words, after all.
What is the real difference between poop and shit?
Very awesome and fucking awesome?At worst cuss words are a reflection on someone's poor vocabulary.
At best they are colorful.
I have a similar reaction to someone saying "like, I was, like, going to go, like, to the store and like this guy like said..." as I would to someone peppering their conversation wish unnecessary swear words.I'd be curious to hear from those who is truly offended by cuss words.
Why? What would be the problem with the FCC allowing cussing on TV during the day?Just something I wonder about sometimes...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290434</id>
	<title>Re:mandatory ...</title>
	<author>Drathos</author>
	<datestamp>1267177980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was thinking more along the lines of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch#v=5rVQGT01Kzg" title="youtube.com">Demolition Man</a> [youtube.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was thinking more along the lines of Demolition Man [ youtube.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was thinking more along the lines of Demolition Man [youtube.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292500</id>
	<title>Re:What's wrong swith cuss words?</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1267188900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is psychologically useful to have certain reserved word which only only used when extraordinary emotional impact is appropriate. For instance, saying "fiddlesticks!" when you stub your toe is much less satisfying than a load outburst of "fuck!" Overuse of these words in everyday speech lessens their emotional impact, and make them less psychologically satisfying when you really need to express your displeasure.<br>Personally, I've caught myself quoting an old coworker about piping data to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/dev/null being like "sending the bits up an angel's ass!"... then realized I was talking to a devout christian coworker. He never batted an eye or complained, but I sure felt like an ass. There's a thin line between "colorful" and "offensive".</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is psychologically useful to have certain reserved word which only only used when extraordinary emotional impact is appropriate .
For instance , saying " fiddlesticks !
" when you stub your toe is much less satisfying than a load outburst of " fuck !
" Overuse of these words in everyday speech lessens their emotional impact , and make them less psychologically satisfying when you really need to express your displeasure.Personally , I 've caught myself quoting an old coworker about piping data to /dev/null being like " sending the bits up an angel 's ass ! " .. .
then realized I was talking to a devout christian coworker .
He never batted an eye or complained , but I sure felt like an ass .
There 's a thin line between " colorful " and " offensive " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is psychologically useful to have certain reserved word which only only used when extraordinary emotional impact is appropriate.
For instance, saying "fiddlesticks!
" when you stub your toe is much less satisfying than a load outburst of "fuck!
" Overuse of these words in everyday speech lessens their emotional impact, and make them less psychologically satisfying when you really need to express your displeasure.Personally, I've caught myself quoting an old coworker about piping data to /dev/null being like "sending the bits up an angel's ass!"...
then realized I was talking to a devout christian coworker.
He never batted an eye or complained, but I sure felt like an ass.
There's a thin line between "colorful" and "offensive".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290274</id>
	<title>Response to Arnold's Letter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267177260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is probably a jab back at Governor Arnold's <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2009/10/28/schwarzenegger-gives-california-legislature-a-hidden-finger/" title="techcrunch.com" rel="nofollow">letter</a> [techcrunch.com] to them from a few months back.  Note that they went out of their way to put a swearing jar in his mansion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is probably a jab back at Governor Arnold 's letter [ techcrunch.com ] to them from a few months back .
Note that they went out of their way to put a swearing jar in his mansion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is probably a jab back at Governor Arnold's letter [techcrunch.com] to them from a few months back.
Note that they went out of their way to put a swearing jar in his mansion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290206</id>
	<title>Re:Fuck you, asshole</title>
	<author>kramerd</author>
	<datestamp>1267176900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You dipshit fuckwad moderators.</p><p>Ok, mods, make it 5, offtopic then.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You dipshit fuckwad moderators.Ok , mods , make it 5 , offtopic then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You dipshit fuckwad moderators.Ok, mods, make it 5, offtopic then.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290088</id>
	<title>Obviously, they do not have any REAL problem</title>
	<author>gweihir</author>
	<datestamp>1267176360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Otherwise they would not do such stupid and utterly pointless publicity stunts.</p><p>This is also counterproductive, as cussing is part of normal and healty human behaviour. Banning cussing will only serve to cause people to built up anger without outlet. Maybe they should rename this the "promoting senseless violence week", which is more what this is likely to do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Otherwise they would not do such stupid and utterly pointless publicity stunts.This is also counterproductive , as cussing is part of normal and healty human behaviour .
Banning cussing will only serve to cause people to built up anger without outlet .
Maybe they should rename this the " promoting senseless violence week " , which is more what this is likely to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Otherwise they would not do such stupid and utterly pointless publicity stunts.This is also counterproductive, as cussing is part of normal and healty human behaviour.
Banning cussing will only serve to cause people to built up anger without outlet.
Maybe they should rename this the "promoting senseless violence week", which is more what this is likely to do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290610</id>
	<title>Re:working hard...or</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267178760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>where you come from governments don't multitask?</htmltext>
<tokenext>where you come from governments do n't multitask ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>where you come from governments don't multitask?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290018</id>
	<title>Ooo! Fiddle Dee Dee...</title>
	<author>genghisjahn</author>
	<datestamp>1267176180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...that will require a tetanus shot.  But, I'm not going to swear.  But I am going to BEAT THIS DOG HOUSE DOWN!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>...that will require a tetanus shot .
But , I 'm not going to swear .
But I am going to BEAT THIS DOG HOUSE DOWN !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that will require a tetanus shot.
But, I'm not going to swear.
But I am going to BEAT THIS DOG HOUSE DOWN!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290778</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds OK to me</title>
	<author>okooolo</author>
	<datestamp>1267179540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll be damned before I say "oh my goodness" next time my coworker almost nails my foot with a nail gun.. (while framing a roof)

strong men need strong words</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll be damned before I say " oh my goodness " next time my coworker almost nails my foot with a nail gun.. ( while framing a roof ) strong men need strong words</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll be damned before I say "oh my goodness" next time my coworker almost nails my foot with a nail gun.. (while framing a roof)

strong men need strong words</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291982</id>
	<title>What the Hell?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267186380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As we say around here, "Fuck that Shit".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As we say around here , " Fuck that Shit " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As we say around here, "Fuck that Shit".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290980</id>
	<title>The Governator</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1267180500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Governator responded with his catchphrase, "Fuck you asshole," which previously he only used in his R-rated movies. He then added, "You are one ugly motherfucker."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Governator responded with his catchphrase , " Fuck you asshole , " which previously he only used in his R-rated movies .
He then added , " You are one ugly motherfucker .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Governator responded with his catchphrase, "Fuck you asshole," which previously he only used in his R-rated movies.
He then added, "You are one ugly motherfucker.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289980</id>
	<title>Fuck you, asshole</title>
	<author>BadAnalogyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1267175940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Give me your clothes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Give me your clothes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give me your clothes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290820</id>
	<title>Re:working hard...or</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1267179720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yet another example of the sway held by special interests, like the incredibly influential <a href="http://www.southparkstudios.com/guide/502/" title="southparkstudios.com">Knights of Standards and Practices</a> [southparkstudios.com]. Too long have their outdated ways oppressed the advancement of dragon-kind. Free Geldon!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet another example of the sway held by special interests , like the incredibly influential Knights of Standards and Practices [ southparkstudios.com ] .
Too long have their outdated ways oppressed the advancement of dragon-kind .
Free Geldon !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet another example of the sway held by special interests, like the incredibly influential Knights of Standards and Practices [southparkstudios.com].
Too long have their outdated ways oppressed the advancement of dragon-kind.
Free Geldon!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290652</id>
	<title>America...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267179000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>America... fuck ya!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>America... fuck ya !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>America... fuck ya!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291656</id>
	<title>Re:Of course</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267184580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Belgium, Belgium !!!<br>putain de merde, watch your language<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; --A French citizen</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Belgium , Belgium ! !
! putain de merde , watch your language     --A French citizen</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Belgium, Belgium !!
!putain de merde, watch your language
    --A French citizen</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290184</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward....</title>
	<author>Coffee Warlord</author>
	<datestamp>1267176840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...you are fined one half credit for violation of the verbal moralities statute.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...you are fined one half credit for violation of the verbal moralities statute .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...you are fined one half credit for violation of the verbal moralities statute.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291716</id>
	<title>Cuss-Free Week....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267184880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is "one ugly mother fucker"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is " one ugly mother fucker "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is "one ugly mother fucker"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290530</id>
	<title>well......</title>
	<author>trum4n</author>
	<datestamp>1267178340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...fuck that!</htmltext>
<tokenext>...fuck that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...fuck that!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290394</id>
	<title>Re:working hard...or</title>
	<author>dgatwood</author>
	<datestamp>1267177800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Good to see that with schools going down the toilet, a budget spirally out of control and more and more companies moving out of the area...the legislature is hard at work.</p></div></blockquote><p>No, you're thinking too narrowly again.  The "swear jar" in the state house is actually their solution to the school funding problems.  Estimates are that it will bring in upwards of $2 million per day in added revenue.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good to see that with schools going down the toilet , a budget spirally out of control and more and more companies moving out of the area...the legislature is hard at work.No , you 're thinking too narrowly again .
The " swear jar " in the state house is actually their solution to the school funding problems .
Estimates are that it will bring in upwards of $ 2 million per day in added revenue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good to see that with schools going down the toilet, a budget spirally out of control and more and more companies moving out of the area...the legislature is hard at work.No, you're thinking too narrowly again.
The "swear jar" in the state house is actually their solution to the school funding problems.
Estimates are that it will bring in upwards of $2 million per day in added revenue.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290214</id>
	<title>Great Way to Raise Revenue</title>
	<author>thedbp</author>
	<datestamp>1267176960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They can appeal to the Moral "Majority" by saying "Hey!  Let's not swear for a week, and we'll set up a swear jar too!" but really what they're saying is "Hey, you cocksucker motherfuckers!  We fucking know you can't control your goddamn language you bastards, so cough up some fucking dough!"  Great way to get some money in CA's coffers.  They are struggling, and with all the filthy language that flies around that very liberal patch of land, this could very well lead to serious revenue.</p><p>Yes, I'm being facetious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They can appeal to the Moral " Majority " by saying " Hey !
Let 's not swear for a week , and we 'll set up a swear jar too !
" but really what they 're saying is " Hey , you cocksucker motherfuckers !
We fucking know you ca n't control your goddamn language you bastards , so cough up some fucking dough !
" Great way to get some money in CA 's coffers .
They are struggling , and with all the filthy language that flies around that very liberal patch of land , this could very well lead to serious revenue.Yes , I 'm being facetious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They can appeal to the Moral "Majority" by saying "Hey!
Let's not swear for a week, and we'll set up a swear jar too!
" but really what they're saying is "Hey, you cocksucker motherfuckers!
We fucking know you can't control your goddamn language you bastards, so cough up some fucking dough!
"  Great way to get some money in CA's coffers.
They are struggling, and with all the filthy language that flies around that very liberal patch of land, this could very well lead to serious revenue.Yes, I'm being facetious.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290096</id>
	<title>swear jar in the Assembly</title>
	<author>voodoo cheesecake</author>
	<datestamp>1267176420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, that sure beats the shit out of raising taxes!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , that sure beats the shit out of raising taxes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, that sure beats the shit out of raising taxes!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290728</id>
	<title>Nuts</title>
	<author>magus\_melchior</author>
	<datestamp>1267179360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suppose that's the best a state government in a straight-jacket can come up with...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose that 's the best a state government in a straight-jacket can come up with.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose that's the best a state government in a straight-jacket can come up with...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290642</id>
	<title>The One Signature</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1267179000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Where's the post from the guy with the signature:<p><div class="quote"><p>Take away the right to say fuck, and you take away the right to say "Fuck the government."</p></div><p>
It seems he would have a particularly interested bit in this release. I wonder if he lives in California.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where 's the post from the guy with the signature : Take away the right to say fuck , and you take away the right to say " Fuck the government .
" It seems he would have a particularly interested bit in this release .
I wonder if he lives in California .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where's the post from the guy with the signature:Take away the right to say fuck, and you take away the right to say "Fuck the government.
"
It seems he would have a particularly interested bit in this release.
I wonder if he lives in California.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292240</id>
	<title>Re:CA must be on easy street</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267187520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it alright if we substitute RoHL compliance with RoFL (reduction of foul language) compliance?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it alright if we substitute RoHL compliance with RoFL ( reduction of foul language ) compliance ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it alright if we substitute RoHL compliance with RoFL (reduction of foul language) compliance?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290432</id>
	<title>Finally a solution</title>
	<author>Anxiety35</author>
	<datestamp>1267177920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Budget crisis fixed. It took real leadership to get us back on the right track.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Budget crisis fixed .
It took real leadership to get us back on the right track .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Budget crisis fixed.
It took real leadership to get us back on the right track.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290272</id>
	<title>Ob Penny Arcade</title>
	<author>Chris Mattern</author>
	<datestamp>1267177200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/1/16/" title="penny-arcade.com">Here.</a> [penny-arcade.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here .
[ penny-arcade.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here.
[penny-arcade.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291004</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds OK to me</title>
	<author>russotto</author>
	<datestamp>1267180680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>One of my favorite definitions of courtesy is "acting so that those around you are most comfortable". All too often, people who use swear words are completely oblivious to those around them who would rather not hear them.</p></div> </blockquote><p>I'm uncomfortable around those who are offended by my language.  The need to constantly invent circumlocutions for "offensive" words, and the distractions engendered when such circumlocutions are skipped and someone takes offense, add significant effort to discourse... which may, in fact, be the reason for such rules.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of my favorite definitions of courtesy is " acting so that those around you are most comfortable " .
All too often , people who use swear words are completely oblivious to those around them who would rather not hear them .
I 'm uncomfortable around those who are offended by my language .
The need to constantly invent circumlocutions for " offensive " words , and the distractions engendered when such circumlocutions are skipped and someone takes offense , add significant effort to discourse... which may , in fact , be the reason for such rules .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of my favorite definitions of courtesy is "acting so that those around you are most comfortable".
All too often, people who use swear words are completely oblivious to those around them who would rather not hear them.
I'm uncomfortable around those who are offended by my language.
The need to constantly invent circumlocutions for "offensive" words, and the distractions engendered when such circumlocutions are skipped and someone takes offense, add significant effort to discourse... which may, in fact, be the reason for such rules.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291154</id>
	<title>slightly disappointed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267181520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>A tiny naive part of me expected to come in here, check the comments, and not find a trace of profanity.  A mass demonstration of people obeying this law would have been a great joke.  Ah, but the discipline and coordination it would have taken<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. I should have fucking known better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A tiny naive part of me expected to come in here , check the comments , and not find a trace of profanity .
A mass demonstration of people obeying this law would have been a great joke .
Ah , but the discipline and coordination it would have taken .. I should have fucking known better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A tiny naive part of me expected to come in here, check the comments, and not find a trace of profanity.
A mass demonstration of people obeying this law would have been a great joke.
Ah, but the discipline and coordination it would have taken .. I should have fucking known better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290286</id>
	<title>Role Models</title>
	<author>Tsiangkun</author>
	<datestamp>1267177320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Frequently I like to embrace the role models in our government and <br>
use word placement to make a point. Arnold did this, and it was <br>
clear what his intentions were. I applaud our government for <br>
keeping their promises on this critical piece of legislation. <br>

<br>

Year after year tax payer money gets thrown away on <br>
one stupid idea after another. Unless we can educated the <br>
uneducated, these movie stars will continue to rule. <br>

<br>

America needs leadership that can dedicate a week to getting <br>
results. A week just to stop swearing at each other, that is <br>
not even a good start. We need a week away from faith in <br>
our markets to fix everything. We need a week of using <br>
logic to solve problems. We need to vote third party, the <br>
democrats and republics are colluding, but they call it compromise.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Frequently I like to embrace the role models in our government and use word placement to make a point .
Arnold did this , and it was clear what his intentions were .
I applaud our government for keeping their promises on this critical piece of legislation .
Year after year tax payer money gets thrown away on one stupid idea after another .
Unless we can educated the uneducated , these movie stars will continue to rule .
America needs leadership that can dedicate a week to getting results .
A week just to stop swearing at each other , that is not even a good start .
We need a week away from faith in our markets to fix everything .
We need a week of using logic to solve problems .
We need to vote third party , the democrats and republics are colluding , but they call it compromise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frequently I like to embrace the role models in our government and 
use word placement to make a point.
Arnold did this, and it was 
clear what his intentions were.
I applaud our government for 
keeping their promises on this critical piece of legislation.
Year after year tax payer money gets thrown away on 
one stupid idea after another.
Unless we can educated the 
uneducated, these movie stars will continue to rule.
America needs leadership that can dedicate a week to getting 
results.
A week just to stop swearing at each other, that is 
not even a good start.
We need a week away from faith in 
our markets to fix everything.
We need a week of using 
logic to solve problems.
We need to vote third party, the 
democrats and republics are colluding, but they call it compromise.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291090</id>
	<title>yea,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267181160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks a lot you shit-brained, fuck-faced, ball breaking, duck fucking pain in the ass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks a lot you shit-brained , fuck-faced , ball breaking , duck fucking pain in the ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks a lot you shit-brained, fuck-faced, ball breaking, duck fucking pain in the ass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292192</id>
	<title>Re:CA must be on easy street</title>
	<author>Khyber</author>
	<datestamp>1267187340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Insightful, Funny, and Informative mods need to be tossed upon you in droves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Insightful , Funny , and Informative mods need to be tossed upon you in droves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Insightful, Funny, and Informative mods need to be tossed upon you in droves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289990</id>
	<title>And...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267176000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdot needs a no sampenzus-free week where he stops polluting the other categories with his idle crap.  Exactly what does this have to do with YRO?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot needs a no sampenzus-free week where he stops polluting the other categories with his idle crap .
Exactly what does this have to do with YRO ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot needs a no sampenzus-free week where he stops polluting the other categories with his idle crap.
Exactly what does this have to do with YRO?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292570</id>
	<title>More popular "feel good measures"...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267189440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Californians deserve everything they get.</p><p>This is what you empower your government to do? Sit around creating empty feel good measures while confiscating your property to fund their existence?</p><p>Idiots, one and all. Enjoy your servitude.</p><p>Or get off your arse and do something more constructive than "voting" for American Idol.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Californians deserve everything they get.This is what you empower your government to do ?
Sit around creating empty feel good measures while confiscating your property to fund their existence ? Idiots , one and all .
Enjoy your servitude.Or get off your arse and do something more constructive than " voting " for American Idol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Californians deserve everything they get.This is what you empower your government to do?
Sit around creating empty feel good measures while confiscating your property to fund their existence?Idiots, one and all.
Enjoy your servitude.Or get off your arse and do something more constructive than "voting" for American Idol.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289966</id>
	<title>May I be the first one to say</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267175880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fuck that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294488</id>
	<title>Makes sense:</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1267204260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Gives an excuse for officious busybodies to pretend to be the thought police and go around bothering everyone around them with, "no no no, it's cuss free week" and wag their finger like the president.  </p><p>Simultaneously completely failing to encourage any kind of <em>actual</em> civility by asking the question, <b>"What can I tell others to do to make the world a better place to live in?"</b> instead of encouraging people to ask the question, "What can I do to make things more pleasant for the people around me?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gives an excuse for officious busybodies to pretend to be the thought police and go around bothering everyone around them with , " no no no , it 's cuss free week " and wag their finger like the president .
Simultaneously completely failing to encourage any kind of actual civility by asking the question , " What can I tell others to do to make the world a better place to live in ?
" instead of encouraging people to ask the question , " What can I do to make things more pleasant for the people around me ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gives an excuse for officious busybodies to pretend to be the thought police and go around bothering everyone around them with, "no no no, it's cuss free week" and wag their finger like the president.
Simultaneously completely failing to encourage any kind of actual civility by asking the question, "What can I tell others to do to make the world a better place to live in?
" instead of encouraging people to ask the question, "What can I do to make things more pleasant for the people around me?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290590</id>
	<title>Re:CA must be on easy street</title>
	<author>j-turkey</author>
	<datestamp>1267178640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Those California legislators are totally un-politically correct.  This bill is insensitive to people with Tourette syndrome.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those California legislators are totally un-politically correct .
This bill is insensitive to people with Tourette syndrome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those California legislators are totally un-politically correct.
This bill is insensitive to people with Tourette syndrome.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290866</id>
	<title>Swear Jar?</title>
	<author>Ardx</author>
	<datestamp>1267179960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Evidently someone in the California government likes Budweiser... or at least thier commercial.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifjMgEWDoWQ" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifjMgEWDoWQ</a> [youtube.com]

Would the owner of a white station please go fuck yourself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Evidently someone in the California government likes Budweiser... or at least thier commercial .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = ifjMgEWDoWQ [ youtube.com ] Would the owner of a white station please go fuck yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Evidently someone in the California government likes Budweiser... or at least thier commercial.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifjMgEWDoWQ [youtube.com]

Would the owner of a white station please go fuck yourself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290380</id>
	<title>Re:Of course</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267177740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your goddamn post is not the only fucking one to not cuss, bitch!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your goddamn post is not the only fucking one to not cuss , bitch !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your goddamn post is not the only fucking one to not cuss, bitch!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291180</id>
	<title>There's a madness to this reason</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1267181640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Too many people were swearing at the legislature for their brain dead performance, so this is how they fix it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Too many people were swearing at the legislature for their brain dead performance , so this is how they fix it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too many people were swearing at the legislature for their brain dead performance, so this is how they fix it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291046</id>
	<title>California is a bit ahead of the curve</title>
	<author>night\_flyer</author>
	<datestamp>1267180920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since the Federal Gov't effectively banned incandescent light-bulbs with the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007... I hope they aren't leading the way on this also</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since the Federal Gov't effectively banned incandescent light-bulbs with the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007... I hope they are n't leading the way on this also</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since the Federal Gov't effectively banned incandescent light-bulbs with the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007... I hope they aren't leading the way on this also</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290492</id>
	<title>Re:Just one thing, Dude...</title>
	<author>hldn</author>
	<datestamp>1267178220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the fuck you talkin about?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the fuck you talkin about ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the fuck you talkin about?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290506</id>
	<title>A different kind of air pollution.</title>
	<author>henrywasserman</author>
	<datestamp>1267178220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now that there's some air pollution regulation that I can support and understand.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that there 's some air pollution regulation that I can support and understand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that there's some air pollution regulation that I can support and understand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31295162</id>
	<title>Re:What's wrong swith cuss words?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267213500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This isn't just some conceptual BS, if you stop and think, it doesn't make any sense whatsoever to be offended by a single word if it isn't used to intentionally offend you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't just some conceptual BS , if you stop and think , it does n't make any sense whatsoever to be offended by a single word if it is n't used to intentionally offend you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't just some conceptual BS, if you stop and think, it doesn't make any sense whatsoever to be offended by a single word if it isn't used to intentionally offend you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291896</id>
	<title>Wow.  Embarrassing!</title>
	<author>steppin\_razor\_LA</author>
	<datestamp>1267185900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think I've ever said this before, but this actually makes me embarrassed to be a Californian.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think I 've ever said this before , but this actually makes me embarrassed to be a Californian .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think I've ever said this before, but this actually makes me embarrassed to be a Californian.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292462</id>
	<title>Re:Of course</title>
	<author>josgeluk</author>
	<datestamp>1267188720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As a Dutchman, I draw the line at Belgium.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a Dutchman , I draw the line at Belgium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a Dutchman, I draw the line at Belgium.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290294</id>
	<title>Re:Anonymous Coward....</title>
	<author>ElKry</author>
	<datestamp>1267177320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Coincidentally, the very same movie that talks about President Schwarzenegger and the amendments to the Constitution made to allow him to run for President of the USA.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Coincidentally , the very same movie that talks about President Schwarzenegger and the amendments to the Constitution made to allow him to run for President of the USA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Coincidentally, the very same movie that talks about President Schwarzenegger and the amendments to the Constitution made to allow him to run for President of the USA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294370</id>
	<title>bud light?</title>
	<author>mordorph</author>
	<datestamp>1267202760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>will the monies garnered by the swear jar be used to purchase bud light for the legislature?</htmltext>
<tokenext>will the monies garnered by the swear jar be used to purchase bud light for the legislature ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>will the monies garnered by the swear jar be used to purchase bud light for the legislature?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31295500</id>
	<title>Re:CA must be on easy street</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267262100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, not to be a pedant, but what you're referring to is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coprolalia" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">coprolalia</a> [wikipedia.org]. It's actually relatively rare in Tourette's sufferers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , not to be a pedant , but what you 're referring to is coprolalia [ wikipedia.org ] .
It 's actually relatively rare in Tourette 's sufferers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, not to be a pedant, but what you're referring to is coprolalia [wikipedia.org].
It's actually relatively rare in Tourette's sufferers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290430</id>
	<title>Re:Just one thing, Dude...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267177920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course we do, stop being such an @$$#0|3</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course we do , stop being such an @ $ $ # 0 | 3</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course we do, stop being such an @$$#0|3</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294978</id>
	<title>Re:CA must be on easy street</title>
	<author>DiEx-15</author>
	<datestamp>1267210740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://dontfingussthisweek.ytmnd.com/" title="ytmnd.com" rel="nofollow">http://dontfingussthisweek.ytmnd.com/</a> [ytmnd.com] (Note: The music is NSFW)<br> <br>

Feel free to send this to the CA Legislators!</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //dontfingussthisweek.ytmnd.com/ [ ytmnd.com ] ( Note : The music is NSFW ) Feel free to send this to the CA Legislators !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://dontfingussthisweek.ytmnd.com/ [ytmnd.com] (Note: The music is NSFW) 

Feel free to send this to the CA Legislators!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292632</id>
	<title>Re:What's wrong swith cuss words?</title>
	<author>azenpunk</author>
	<datestamp>1267189980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Think of what those words mean, what they refer to.  Historically, profane is anything that's outside of the church.  Grocery shopping is profane, because it's not part of worship.  Now notice that all the topics they refer to are things that have little place in church services.  Fuck, shit, bitch.  You can talk about sex during a church service, you can mention feces, even female dogs but it would be done in a mature and respectful manner and done in relation to God, Jesus and the Gospels.  However, referring to these topics in such crass and crude terms, such as talking about fucking, shit or referring to women as bitches, would really <i>never</i> have a place in church services and therefor would always be profane.  Couple that with the puritanical roots of the United States and you can see how they are considered 'bad.'</p><p>To be fair though, excessive use of such words <i>is</i> a sign of immaturity, gratuitous and generally pointless.  I do quite like the way many of them sound, their abruptness...they are like little verbal gunshots to my ears, and i do like to go shooting.   A sentence filled with profanity is likely to be devoid of thought as well.  I do approve of them being considered "bad" words at least for children as i would rather my children (when i have them) learn to express themselves thoughtfully over using expletive filled tirades.</p><p>As far as not being allowed to use profanity stifling "free expression," well that is totally false.  You can invariable express your thoughts more accurately and clearly without the use of profanity.  Consider the following phrases:  "Fuck you pal!" and "Sir, if i ever gained the approval of a man such as yourself, i would hang myself in shame."  Which is more expressive?</p><p>In fact, a ban on profanity does not infringe upon ones first amendment rights.  Even if profanity is illegal you can still advocate any political view legally, one may have to achieve a higher level of eloquence however.  I am vehemently against such a ban as that is not a power granted to the Legislature (federal i know for sure, pretty sure about CA state, and yes i do know this is not a ban).  As far as the problem with allowing profanity on daytime TV, ask instead what would really be gained by allowing it.   Are you really missing out on anything because of the FCC's ban?  Likely not.  I do not mean to dismiss the question you pose, however it alone is not sufficient to properly illuminate the topic.</p><p>Now:<br>"Hell, Damn Fart.  Boobs Fart Boobs!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Think of what those words mean , what they refer to .
Historically , profane is anything that 's outside of the church .
Grocery shopping is profane , because it 's not part of worship .
Now notice that all the topics they refer to are things that have little place in church services .
Fuck , shit , bitch .
You can talk about sex during a church service , you can mention feces , even female dogs but it would be done in a mature and respectful manner and done in relation to God , Jesus and the Gospels .
However , referring to these topics in such crass and crude terms , such as talking about fucking , shit or referring to women as bitches , would really never have a place in church services and therefor would always be profane .
Couple that with the puritanical roots of the United States and you can see how they are considered 'bad .
'To be fair though , excessive use of such words is a sign of immaturity , gratuitous and generally pointless .
I do quite like the way many of them sound , their abruptness...they are like little verbal gunshots to my ears , and i do like to go shooting .
A sentence filled with profanity is likely to be devoid of thought as well .
I do approve of them being considered " bad " words at least for children as i would rather my children ( when i have them ) learn to express themselves thoughtfully over using expletive filled tirades.As far as not being allowed to use profanity stifling " free expression , " well that is totally false .
You can invariable express your thoughts more accurately and clearly without the use of profanity .
Consider the following phrases : " Fuck you pal !
" and " Sir , if i ever gained the approval of a man such as yourself , i would hang myself in shame .
" Which is more expressive ? In fact , a ban on profanity does not infringe upon ones first amendment rights .
Even if profanity is illegal you can still advocate any political view legally , one may have to achieve a higher level of eloquence however .
I am vehemently against such a ban as that is not a power granted to the Legislature ( federal i know for sure , pretty sure about CA state , and yes i do know this is not a ban ) .
As far as the problem with allowing profanity on daytime TV , ask instead what would really be gained by allowing it .
Are you really missing out on anything because of the FCC 's ban ?
Likely not .
I do not mean to dismiss the question you pose , however it alone is not sufficient to properly illuminate the topic.Now : " Hell , Damn Fart .
Boobs Fart Boobs !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think of what those words mean, what they refer to.
Historically, profane is anything that's outside of the church.
Grocery shopping is profane, because it's not part of worship.
Now notice that all the topics they refer to are things that have little place in church services.
Fuck, shit, bitch.
You can talk about sex during a church service, you can mention feces, even female dogs but it would be done in a mature and respectful manner and done in relation to God, Jesus and the Gospels.
However, referring to these topics in such crass and crude terms, such as talking about fucking, shit or referring to women as bitches, would really never have a place in church services and therefor would always be profane.
Couple that with the puritanical roots of the United States and you can see how they are considered 'bad.
'To be fair though, excessive use of such words is a sign of immaturity, gratuitous and generally pointless.
I do quite like the way many of them sound, their abruptness...they are like little verbal gunshots to my ears, and i do like to go shooting.
A sentence filled with profanity is likely to be devoid of thought as well.
I do approve of them being considered "bad" words at least for children as i would rather my children (when i have them) learn to express themselves thoughtfully over using expletive filled tirades.As far as not being allowed to use profanity stifling "free expression," well that is totally false.
You can invariable express your thoughts more accurately and clearly without the use of profanity.
Consider the following phrases:  "Fuck you pal!
" and "Sir, if i ever gained the approval of a man such as yourself, i would hang myself in shame.
"  Which is more expressive?In fact, a ban on profanity does not infringe upon ones first amendment rights.
Even if profanity is illegal you can still advocate any political view legally, one may have to achieve a higher level of eloquence however.
I am vehemently against such a ban as that is not a power granted to the Legislature (federal i know for sure, pretty sure about CA state, and yes i do know this is not a ban).
As far as the problem with allowing profanity on daytime TV, ask instead what would really be gained by allowing it.
Are you really missing out on anything because of the FCC's ban?
Likely not.
I do not mean to dismiss the question you pose, however it alone is not sufficient to properly illuminate the topic.Now:"Hell, Damn Fart.
Boobs Fart Boobs!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290838</id>
	<title>what is going on there?</title>
	<author>Goldsmith</author>
	<datestamp>1267179840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really.  That state has major, major problems.  Another few years of this kind of governing will lead to California being the "Greece" of the US.  We need to take a hard look at what's happening to the EU when one of their member states has serious financial problems.  Then look at California's tanking credit rating (lowest of any US state) and historic inability to balance even a basic operating budget, even during good years!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really .
That state has major , major problems .
Another few years of this kind of governing will lead to California being the " Greece " of the US .
We need to take a hard look at what 's happening to the EU when one of their member states has serious financial problems .
Then look at California 's tanking credit rating ( lowest of any US state ) and historic inability to balance even a basic operating budget , even during good years !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really.
That state has major, major problems.
Another few years of this kind of governing will lead to California being the "Greece" of the US.
We need to take a hard look at what's happening to the EU when one of their member states has serious financial problems.
Then look at California's tanking credit rating (lowest of any US state) and historic inability to balance even a basic operating budget, even during good years!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290770</id>
	<title>So California's fucking budget crisis is over?</title>
	<author>Kymermosst</author>
	<datestamp>1267179540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now that the shitty Californian budget clusterfuck is solved, the cocksuckers in the legislature can get on to fucking some other shit up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that the shitty Californian budget clusterfuck is solved , the cocksuckers in the legislature can get on to fucking some other shit up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that the shitty Californian budget clusterfuck is solved, the cocksuckers in the legislature can get on to fucking some other shit up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290716</id>
	<title>Re:Of course</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1267179240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Maybe even all but one of the posts will contain cuss-words.</p></div><p>Not this one. Belgium.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe even all but one of the posts will contain cuss-words.Not this one .
Belgium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe even all but one of the posts will contain cuss-words.Not this one.
Belgium.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291514</id>
	<title>Re:What's wrong swith cuss words?</title>
	<author>misexistentialist</author>
	<datestamp>1267183680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bringing up bodily functions and using insults in conversation is generally rude. "Fucking awesome" is indeed diluted by unrelated uses, but it still is awkward for those of us who frequently hear it in the literal sense.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bringing up bodily functions and using insults in conversation is generally rude .
" Fucking awesome " is indeed diluted by unrelated uses , but it still is awkward for those of us who frequently hear it in the literal sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bringing up bodily functions and using insults in conversation is generally rude.
"Fucking awesome" is indeed diluted by unrelated uses, but it still is awkward for those of us who frequently hear it in the literal sense.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294790</id>
	<title>Re:CA must be on easy street</title>
	<author>simoncpu was here</author>
	<datestamp>1267207860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>what a fucking waste of time</p></div><p>What the frak? It's not a frakking waste of time, you mentally special and different-abled, person!  Oh gods, don't you realize that this will protect the children?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>what a fucking waste of timeWhat the frak ?
It 's not a frakking waste of time , you mentally special and different-abled , person !
Oh gods , do n't you realize that this will protect the children ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what a fucking waste of timeWhat the frak?
It's not a frakking waste of time, you mentally special and different-abled, person!
Oh gods, don't you realize that this will protect the children?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294568</id>
	<title>Re:CA must be on easy street</title>
	<author>JWSmythe</author>
	<datestamp>1267204980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>  Thank you, I have a new tagline.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; And to keep with the theme here...</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; That's the stupidest fucking shit I've ever heard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you , I have a new tagline .
: )     And to keep with the theme here.. .     That 's the stupidest fucking shit I 've ever heard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  Thank you, I have a new tagline.
:)
    And to keep with the theme here...
    That's the stupidest fucking shit I've ever heard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290620</id>
	<title>you're fucking kidding me...Seriously.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267178820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're fucking kidding me...</p><p>Seriously - with all of the issues in my great home state, THIS is how they're spending their time in the legislature?</p><p>What a bunch of retarded fucking asshats. Fuck the fucking fuckers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're fucking kidding me...Seriously - with all of the issues in my great home state , THIS is how they 're spending their time in the legislature ? What a bunch of retarded fucking asshats .
Fuck the fucking fuckers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're fucking kidding me...Seriously - with all of the issues in my great home state, THIS is how they're spending their time in the legislature?What a bunch of retarded fucking asshats.
Fuck the fucking fuckers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294720</id>
	<title>Re:What's wrong swith cuss words?</title>
	<author>AthanasiusKircher</author>
	<datestamp>1267206900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Personally, I view profanity as an issue of decorum. There are circumstances where various behaviors are inappropriate, as some have said, perhaps around children, or grandmothers who might be offended, or whatever. In the same way, it would be usually be inappropriate to walk into a nice restaurant wearing ripped jeans and a tee-shirt with profanity on it.  And it would be inappropriate to go around yelling obscenities in such a restaurant.  You'd be ruining the nice quiet dinners of other people around you.  Part of polite social conduct is respecting the people around you, even if they sometimes place arbitrary limits on behavior. If you don't want to socialize with those people, go to a different restaurant, or don't hang around the kids if you feel a compulsive need to swear continuously.</p><p>

But, regarding laws, I generally prefer that the government mind its own business. If you don't want to hear profanity on television, watch another channel. If you don't want to buy liquor on Sunday, don't buy it. But generally the government should stay out of such things.</p><p>

And yet I also can't quite object to a <i>local</i> government that decides to enforce <i>local</i> community standards, as long as they don't interfere with fundamental rights.  You don't have the right to buy liquor on Sunday -- hell, you don't have a fundamental right to buy liquor at all.  Hence, there are dry communities and counties within the US.  Personally, I don't think such laws work (and there are some studies to prove it), but that's the local community's business.  Just like you have the freedom to watch another channel if you don't like it, you also have the freedom to vote people out of office who pass laws you don't like (or, as a last resort, to move to another community without such restrictions -- the federal government should have nothing to do with such legislation).</p><p>

Getting back to the question of swearing, I have to admit that I don't understand those who object to profanity out of hand either.  I respect their wishes, but I've often seen inconsistencies in their behavior.  For example, I had a friend a few years back who was actually someone that would tell you that she was offended if you used profanity in her presence.  And yet, she also had her own "profanity" -- namely, she'd yell "APPLES, ORANGES, AND PEAS!" when she was really mad about something.  I kid you not -- that's really what she'd say.  So I pointed out to her that essentially she had her own phrase that did most of the things that profanity typically does for most people, so why shouldn't I be offended by her use of that phrase?  I find the same issue with another friend who says "dag gommit" instead of "god dammit" -- again, I'm not sure I understand how this gets around his religious objection to "god dammit."  It strikes me as a weird kind of technicality to get out of the "Lord's name in vain" issue.  Isn't the dividing line arbitrary for these people?  Don't the words that they end up using have the same force and effect that profanity has for others?</p><p>

But in the end, all language is about arbitrary conventions for communication.  Profanity is very effective at communicating certain things to certain people, while it offends other people (and thus fails to communicate to them), and its overuse can detract from its power of communication.  So I don't tend to use it a lot myself (erring on the side of caution), except when it is useful as a precise way to communicate a particular expression or emotion in the right context.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Personally , I view profanity as an issue of decorum .
There are circumstances where various behaviors are inappropriate , as some have said , perhaps around children , or grandmothers who might be offended , or whatever .
In the same way , it would be usually be inappropriate to walk into a nice restaurant wearing ripped jeans and a tee-shirt with profanity on it .
And it would be inappropriate to go around yelling obscenities in such a restaurant .
You 'd be ruining the nice quiet dinners of other people around you .
Part of polite social conduct is respecting the people around you , even if they sometimes place arbitrary limits on behavior .
If you do n't want to socialize with those people , go to a different restaurant , or do n't hang around the kids if you feel a compulsive need to swear continuously .
But , regarding laws , I generally prefer that the government mind its own business .
If you do n't want to hear profanity on television , watch another channel .
If you do n't want to buy liquor on Sunday , do n't buy it .
But generally the government should stay out of such things .
And yet I also ca n't quite object to a local government that decides to enforce local community standards , as long as they do n't interfere with fundamental rights .
You do n't have the right to buy liquor on Sunday -- hell , you do n't have a fundamental right to buy liquor at all .
Hence , there are dry communities and counties within the US .
Personally , I do n't think such laws work ( and there are some studies to prove it ) , but that 's the local community 's business .
Just like you have the freedom to watch another channel if you do n't like it , you also have the freedom to vote people out of office who pass laws you do n't like ( or , as a last resort , to move to another community without such restrictions -- the federal government should have nothing to do with such legislation ) .
Getting back to the question of swearing , I have to admit that I do n't understand those who object to profanity out of hand either .
I respect their wishes , but I 've often seen inconsistencies in their behavior .
For example , I had a friend a few years back who was actually someone that would tell you that she was offended if you used profanity in her presence .
And yet , she also had her own " profanity " -- namely , she 'd yell " APPLES , ORANGES , AND PEAS !
" when she was really mad about something .
I kid you not -- that 's really what she 'd say .
So I pointed out to her that essentially she had her own phrase that did most of the things that profanity typically does for most people , so why should n't I be offended by her use of that phrase ?
I find the same issue with another friend who says " dag gommit " instead of " god dammit " -- again , I 'm not sure I understand how this gets around his religious objection to " god dammit .
" It strikes me as a weird kind of technicality to get out of the " Lord 's name in vain " issue .
Is n't the dividing line arbitrary for these people ?
Do n't the words that they end up using have the same force and effect that profanity has for others ?
But in the end , all language is about arbitrary conventions for communication .
Profanity is very effective at communicating certain things to certain people , while it offends other people ( and thus fails to communicate to them ) , and its overuse can detract from its power of communication .
So I do n't tend to use it a lot myself ( erring on the side of caution ) , except when it is useful as a precise way to communicate a particular expression or emotion in the right context .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personally, I view profanity as an issue of decorum.
There are circumstances where various behaviors are inappropriate, as some have said, perhaps around children, or grandmothers who might be offended, or whatever.
In the same way, it would be usually be inappropriate to walk into a nice restaurant wearing ripped jeans and a tee-shirt with profanity on it.
And it would be inappropriate to go around yelling obscenities in such a restaurant.
You'd be ruining the nice quiet dinners of other people around you.
Part of polite social conduct is respecting the people around you, even if they sometimes place arbitrary limits on behavior.
If you don't want to socialize with those people, go to a different restaurant, or don't hang around the kids if you feel a compulsive need to swear continuously.
But, regarding laws, I generally prefer that the government mind its own business.
If you don't want to hear profanity on television, watch another channel.
If you don't want to buy liquor on Sunday, don't buy it.
But generally the government should stay out of such things.
And yet I also can't quite object to a local government that decides to enforce local community standards, as long as they don't interfere with fundamental rights.
You don't have the right to buy liquor on Sunday -- hell, you don't have a fundamental right to buy liquor at all.
Hence, there are dry communities and counties within the US.
Personally, I don't think such laws work (and there are some studies to prove it), but that's the local community's business.
Just like you have the freedom to watch another channel if you don't like it, you also have the freedom to vote people out of office who pass laws you don't like (or, as a last resort, to move to another community without such restrictions -- the federal government should have nothing to do with such legislation).
Getting back to the question of swearing, I have to admit that I don't understand those who object to profanity out of hand either.
I respect their wishes, but I've often seen inconsistencies in their behavior.
For example, I had a friend a few years back who was actually someone that would tell you that she was offended if you used profanity in her presence.
And yet, she also had her own "profanity" -- namely, she'd yell "APPLES, ORANGES, AND PEAS!
" when she was really mad about something.
I kid you not -- that's really what she'd say.
So I pointed out to her that essentially she had her own phrase that did most of the things that profanity typically does for most people, so why shouldn't I be offended by her use of that phrase?
I find the same issue with another friend who says "dag gommit" instead of "god dammit" -- again, I'm not sure I understand how this gets around his religious objection to "god dammit.
"  It strikes me as a weird kind of technicality to get out of the "Lord's name in vain" issue.
Isn't the dividing line arbitrary for these people?
Don't the words that they end up using have the same force and effect that profanity has for others?
But in the end, all language is about arbitrary conventions for communication.
Profanity is very effective at communicating certain things to certain people, while it offends other people (and thus fails to communicate to them), and its overuse can detract from its power of communication.
So I don't tend to use it a lot myself (erring on the side of caution), except when it is useful as a precise way to communicate a particular expression or emotion in the right context.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290560</id>
	<title>Take credit cards?</title>
	<author>Ostracus</author>
	<datestamp>1267178520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>" Fortunately, the measure only for the first week of March, and compliance is voluntary &mdash; although, apparently, there will be a 'swear jar' in the Assembly and the Governor's mansion. No word yet on whether the Governator intends to comply.""</p><p>Governors office:<br>Scene: Two aides about to get chewed out.<br>Governor walks over to the swear jar and puts in a $100. Apparently it's going to be a long night.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Fortunately , the measure only for the first week of March , and compliance is voluntary    although , apparently , there will be a 'swear jar ' in the Assembly and the Governor 's mansion .
No word yet on whether the Governator intends to comply .
" " Governors office : Scene : Two aides about to get chewed out.Governor walks over to the swear jar and puts in a $ 100 .
Apparently it 's going to be a long night .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>" Fortunately, the measure only for the first week of March, and compliance is voluntary — although, apparently, there will be a 'swear jar' in the Assembly and the Governor's mansion.
No word yet on whether the Governator intends to comply.
""Governors office:Scene: Two aides about to get chewed out.Governor walks over to the swear jar and puts in a $100.
Apparently it's going to be a long night.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290028</id>
	<title>Fuck Off!</title>
	<author>Jerrry</author>
	<datestamp>1267176180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fuck that shit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck that shit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck that shit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290064</id>
	<title>Voluntary....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267176300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>.... For now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>.... For now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.... For now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290696</id>
	<title>Re:Of course</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267179240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pfft... Fuck that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pfft... Fuck that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pfft... Fuck that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291132</id>
	<title>Obligatory Farscape quips....</title>
	<author>TheHawke</author>
	<datestamp>1267181460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Frell this dren!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Frell this dren !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frell this dren!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290356</id>
	<title>Sounds OK to me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267177680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I expect many Slashdotters will dismiss this as some kind of "censorship", although it's voluntary and apparently intended to be good-natured.  I think it's a good thing.
<br> <br>
One of my favorite definitions of courtesy is "acting so that those around you are most comfortable".  All too often, people who use swear words are completely oblivious to those around them who would rather not hear them.  I'm not in favor of any heavy-handed tactics on the part of government (or anyone else) to curb people's non-illegal behavior, but something that promotes civility and politeness in discourse seems unobjectionable to me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I expect many Slashdotters will dismiss this as some kind of " censorship " , although it 's voluntary and apparently intended to be good-natured .
I think it 's a good thing .
One of my favorite definitions of courtesy is " acting so that those around you are most comfortable " .
All too often , people who use swear words are completely oblivious to those around them who would rather not hear them .
I 'm not in favor of any heavy-handed tactics on the part of government ( or anyone else ) to curb people 's non-illegal behavior , but something that promotes civility and politeness in discourse seems unobjectionable to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I expect many Slashdotters will dismiss this as some kind of "censorship", although it's voluntary and apparently intended to be good-natured.
I think it's a good thing.
One of my favorite definitions of courtesy is "acting so that those around you are most comfortable".
All too often, people who use swear words are completely oblivious to those around them who would rather not hear them.
I'm not in favor of any heavy-handed tactics on the part of government (or anyone else) to curb people's non-illegal behavior, but something that promotes civility and politeness in discourse seems unobjectionable to me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290004</id>
	<title>Of course</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267176120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course, this story is going to generate the largest collection of cuss-word containing posts that Slashdot has seen in months.  Maybe even all but one of the posts will contain cuss-words.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , this story is going to generate the largest collection of cuss-word containing posts that Slashdot has seen in months .
Maybe even all but one of the posts will contain cuss-words .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, this story is going to generate the largest collection of cuss-word containing posts that Slashdot has seen in months.
Maybe even all but one of the posts will contain cuss-words.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290550</id>
	<title>The obligatory</title>
	<author>sdnoob</author>
	<datestamp>1267178460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shit<br>Piss<br>Fuck<br>Cunt<br>Cocksucker<br>Motherfucker<br>Tits</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ShitPissFuckCuntCocksuckerMotherfuckerTits</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ShitPissFuckCuntCocksuckerMotherfuckerTits</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290144</id>
	<title>Just what a bankcrupt state government needs.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267176660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just think.... with the money spent passing such nonsense, dozens of teachers or police officers could have been employed.</p><p>*sighs*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just think.... with the money spent passing such nonsense , dozens of teachers or police officers could have been employed .
* sighs *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just think.... with the money spent passing such nonsense, dozens of teachers or police officers could have been employed.
*sighs*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291508</id>
	<title>Re:What's wrong swith cuss words?</title>
	<author>Inda</author>
	<datestamp>1267183620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I like to think of swearing as colourful. I particularly like the use of tmesis - the art of injection a swearword in the middle of another word. Not your common, ordin-fucking-ary swearword injection, it's got to be funny. The Australians do it best.<br><br>But no swearing on the TV during the day please. It's vulgar. There's a time and place for it. With people you trust. It's nasty hearing a young child effin and jeffin...<br><br>Why aren't people offended when I say "do one"? Everyone knows what I'm really saying.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I like to think of swearing as colourful .
I particularly like the use of tmesis - the art of injection a swearword in the middle of another word .
Not your common , ordin-fucking-ary swearword injection , it 's got to be funny .
The Australians do it best.But no swearing on the TV during the day please .
It 's vulgar .
There 's a time and place for it .
With people you trust .
It 's nasty hearing a young child effin and jeffin...Why are n't people offended when I say " do one " ?
Everyone knows what I 'm really saying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like to think of swearing as colourful.
I particularly like the use of tmesis - the art of injection a swearword in the middle of another word.
Not your common, ordin-fucking-ary swearword injection, it's got to be funny.
The Australians do it best.But no swearing on the TV during the day please.
It's vulgar.
There's a time and place for it.
With people you trust.
It's nasty hearing a young child effin and jeffin...Why aren't people offended when I say "do one"?
Everyone knows what I'm really saying.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31296300</id>
	<title>Re:Joke?</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1267280400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>We don't cuss in California!</p></div></blockquote><p>You just don't notice because everyone  does it in Spanish.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We do n't cuss in California ! You just do n't notice because everyone does it in Spanish .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We don't cuss in California!You just don't notice because everyone  does it in Spanish.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290180</id>
	<title>mandatory ...</title>
	<author>sammyF70</author>
	<datestamp>1267176780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJJL5dxgVaM" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJJL5dxgVaM</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = EJJL5dxgVaM [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJJL5dxgVaM [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294412</id>
	<title>We in Texas Recognize...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267203240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pols in the Texas lege come up with this sort of thing when things are a mess. Costs no money, and redirects people's attention. Magicians call it a "misdirect." It was inevitable that CA pols would resort to this. I guess.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pols in the Texas lege come up with this sort of thing when things are a mess .
Costs no money , and redirects people 's attention .
Magicians call it a " misdirect .
" It was inevitable that CA pols would resort to this .
I guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pols in the Texas lege come up with this sort of thing when things are a mess.
Costs no money, and redirects people's attention.
Magicians call it a "misdirect.
" It was inevitable that CA pols would resort to this.
I guess.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31312436</id>
	<title>Re:CA must be on easy street</title>
	<author>kramerd</author>
	<datestamp>1267384860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...I thought the capititalization of words was odd...well done sir.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...I thought the capititalization of words was odd...well done sir .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I thought the capititalization of words was odd...well done sir.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294426</id>
	<title>Tax Dollars?</title>
	<author>wisnoskij</author>
	<datestamp>1267203540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And how many Tax Dollars were wasted on this farce of law?</htmltext>
<tokenext>And how many Tax Dollars were wasted on this farce of law ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And how many Tax Dollars were wasted on this farce of law?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290072</id>
	<title>WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267176300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why the fuck is this in Your Fucking Rights The Fuck Online?  What the fuck does this fucking have to do the fuck with any fucking thing online at fucking all?</p><p>FUCK!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why the fuck is this in Your Fucking Rights The Fuck Online ?
What the fuck does this fucking have to do the fuck with any fucking thing online at fucking all ? FUCK !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why the fuck is this in Your Fucking Rights The Fuck Online?
What the fuck does this fucking have to do the fuck with any fucking thing online at fucking all?FUCK!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291684</id>
	<title>Life Imitates Art</title>
	<author>Aerosiecki</author>
	<datestamp>1267184700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*bzzzt*</p><p>John Spartan, you have been fined one credit for violation of the Verbal Morality Statute.</p><p>Be well!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* bzzzt * John Spartan , you have been fined one credit for violation of the Verbal Morality Statute.Be well !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*bzzzt*John Spartan, you have been fined one credit for violation of the Verbal Morality Statute.Be well!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31297120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31297510
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31323150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31312056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292500
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290294
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31296392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292736
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31295500
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31295514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292446
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31317204
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31295162
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294554
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294204
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31295456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31312436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31296300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_26_1832240_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290620
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290214
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290642
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290000
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31296300
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290144
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31295162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31312056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294204
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294554
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292202
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290034
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290018
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290072
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290434
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290022
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290088
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31297120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31323150
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294488
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290380
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290716
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31295456
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291656
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290848
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290430
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290308
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290610
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290394
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290386
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290440
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31312436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290846
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292240
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294568
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31292192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31297510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290590
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31295514
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31295500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31294790
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291896
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290294
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290778
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31296392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291004
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289990
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31317204
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290206
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31289966
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31290636
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_26_1832240.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_26_1832240.31291154
</commentlist>
</conversation>
