<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_25_1348241</id>
	<title>Passive-Aggressive Wi-Fi Hotspots<span class="vballoon-marquee rd\_5"><span>Comments:</span><a href="#">263</a></span></title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1267107960000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.52ndwest.com/" rel="nofollow">the digital nomad</a> writes <i>"If you've had enough of your neighbor stealing your Wi-Fi connection or letting his dog s#\%t on your lawn, there is now a better solution than suffering in silence with your brooding anger: leave your neighbor 'a message!' <a href="http://www.passiveaggressivenotes.com/2009/12/30/wifi-for-passive-aggressives/">Passive-Aggressive Wi-Fi Hotspots</a> let your networks say what you cannot. And if you're looking for some great name for your Hotspot, make sure to read <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5021550/great-giz-ideas-harass-your-neighbors-with-your-wi+fi-hotspot-name">this post by Gizmodo</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>the digital nomad writes " If you 've had enough of your neighbor stealing your Wi-Fi connection or letting his dog s # \ % t on your lawn , there is now a better solution than suffering in silence with your brooding anger : leave your neighbor 'a message !
' Passive-Aggressive Wi-Fi Hotspots let your networks say what you can not .
And if you 're looking for some great name for your Hotspot , make sure to read this post by Gizmodo .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the digital nomad writes "If you've had enough of your neighbor stealing your Wi-Fi connection or letting his dog s#\%t on your lawn, there is now a better solution than suffering in silence with your brooding anger: leave your neighbor 'a message!
' Passive-Aggressive Wi-Fi Hotspots let your networks say what you cannot.
And if you're looking for some great name for your Hotspot, make sure to read this post by Gizmodo.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272562</id>
	<title>Re:Or.</title>
	<author>magus\_melchior</author>
	<datestamp>1267116060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously. If you can change your wifi network name to "isuckdonkeynuts", you can change the security settings and encryption passphrase.</p><p>Heck, you could hide such an embarrassing network ID...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously .
If you can change your wifi network name to " isuckdonkeynuts " , you can change the security settings and encryption passphrase.Heck , you could hide such an embarrassing network ID.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.
If you can change your wifi network name to "isuckdonkeynuts", you can change the security settings and encryption passphrase.Heck, you could hide such an embarrassing network ID...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271890</id>
	<title>Senile old man</title>
	<author>xbeefsupreme</author>
	<datestamp>1267112160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You Damn kids, get off my wifi!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You Damn kids , get off my wifi !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You Damn kids, get off my wifi!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273014</id>
	<title>Not passive-aggressive</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267118280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sending messages over SSIDs is not passive-aggressive, it's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avoidant" title="wikipedia.org">avoidant</a> [wikipedia.org].  It could be considered passive-aggressive in a contrived example, such as if a neighbor makes lewd comments to your wife, your wife demands that you talk to the neighbor about it, but instead you decide to communicate over SSID.  In that case, you have a responsibility set up by an authority of sorts, and you have ducked that responsibility by fulfilling its terms perhaps by letter and certainly not in spirit.<p>"Passive-aggressive" is a catch-phrase that has been broadened in pop psychology, in part because the Internet has permitted so many more avoidant behaviors and people need a name for it and use the one that has enjoyed more use in the popular (primarily entertainment) media.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sending messages over SSIDs is not passive-aggressive , it 's avoidant [ wikipedia.org ] .
It could be considered passive-aggressive in a contrived example , such as if a neighbor makes lewd comments to your wife , your wife demands that you talk to the neighbor about it , but instead you decide to communicate over SSID .
In that case , you have a responsibility set up by an authority of sorts , and you have ducked that responsibility by fulfilling its terms perhaps by letter and certainly not in spirit .
" Passive-aggressive " is a catch-phrase that has been broadened in pop psychology , in part because the Internet has permitted so many more avoidant behaviors and people need a name for it and use the one that has enjoyed more use in the popular ( primarily entertainment ) media .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sending messages over SSIDs is not passive-aggressive, it's avoidant [wikipedia.org].
It could be considered passive-aggressive in a contrived example, such as if a neighbor makes lewd comments to your wife, your wife demands that you talk to the neighbor about it, but instead you decide to communicate over SSID.
In that case, you have a responsibility set up by an authority of sorts, and you have ducked that responsibility by fulfilling its terms perhaps by letter and certainly not in spirit.
"Passive-aggressive" is a catch-phrase that has been broadened in pop psychology, in part because the Internet has permitted so many more avoidant behaviors and people need a name for it and use the one that has enjoyed more use in the popular (primarily entertainment) media.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272928</id>
	<title>Re:You don't really need to be a jerk</title>
	<author>RobertB-DC</author>
	<datestamp>1267117920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My AP name is an obvious email address -- "access@(my domain name).net".  If someone wants to access it, that's fine with me... but if they don't want it crashing intermittently, they should send me a note and we'll work out some sort of uptime agreement.  This would involve helping pay for a more reliable router.  It occasionally freezes, and the kids know that if they're having lag in Halo, they can just reboot the router to kick off anyone leeching too much bandwidth.</p><p>As it is, though, my unreliable router seems to have done a great job of increasing the number of people who now have their own networks instead of sponging off mine.  (Sadly, they secured theirs, so I can't return the "favor" and save myself a few bucks a month.)</p><p>My only real concern is over having my IP address associated with unsavory activity.  I figure one solution to that would be to set up a TOR server, and set up a transparent proxy to route all leech traffic to go through it.  That would eliminate the liability issues, and might help with the bandwidth as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My AP name is an obvious email address -- " access @ ( my domain name ) .net " .
If someone wants to access it , that 's fine with me... but if they do n't want it crashing intermittently , they should send me a note and we 'll work out some sort of uptime agreement .
This would involve helping pay for a more reliable router .
It occasionally freezes , and the kids know that if they 're having lag in Halo , they can just reboot the router to kick off anyone leeching too much bandwidth.As it is , though , my unreliable router seems to have done a great job of increasing the number of people who now have their own networks instead of sponging off mine .
( Sadly , they secured theirs , so I ca n't return the " favor " and save myself a few bucks a month .
) My only real concern is over having my IP address associated with unsavory activity .
I figure one solution to that would be to set up a TOR server , and set up a transparent proxy to route all leech traffic to go through it .
That would eliminate the liability issues , and might help with the bandwidth as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My AP name is an obvious email address -- "access@(my domain name).net".
If someone wants to access it, that's fine with me... but if they don't want it crashing intermittently, they should send me a note and we'll work out some sort of uptime agreement.
This would involve helping pay for a more reliable router.
It occasionally freezes, and the kids know that if they're having lag in Halo, they can just reboot the router to kick off anyone leeching too much bandwidth.As it is, though, my unreliable router seems to have done a great job of increasing the number of people who now have their own networks instead of sponging off mine.
(Sadly, they secured theirs, so I can't return the "favor" and save myself a few bucks a month.
)My only real concern is over having my IP address associated with unsavory activity.
I figure one solution to that would be to set up a TOR server, and set up a transparent proxy to route all leech traffic to go through it.
That would eliminate the liability issues, and might help with the bandwidth as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272174</id>
	<title>My SSID is BALLNASTY</title>
	<author>L3370</author>
	<datestamp>1267114020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's questionably vulgar. And I know all my neighbors are seeing this.<br> <br>
The best thing about the name was when my girlfriends mother stayed over for vacation.  She brought her laptop and asked for the name of our WiFi network.  My girlfriend said it to her in a mumbling embarrassed tone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's questionably vulgar .
And I know all my neighbors are seeing this .
The best thing about the name was when my girlfriends mother stayed over for vacation .
She brought her laptop and asked for the name of our WiFi network .
My girlfriend said it to her in a mumbling embarrassed tone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's questionably vulgar.
And I know all my neighbors are seeing this.
The best thing about the name was when my girlfriends mother stayed over for vacation.
She brought her laptop and asked for the name of our WiFi network.
My girlfriend said it to her in a mumbling embarrassed tone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272278</id>
	<title>Easy ways to put people off</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267114560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>On of the APs local to me is called "IWillSniffYourPackets" or some such (I'm not at home right now to check). For the time that my SSID was not hidden (for some reason the old man's laptop refused to connect to the AP if the name wasn't visible, a problem that went away when the AP died and was replaced) I used "ReceptionError" figuring people would bypass a secured AP with a name that implied it wouldn't work in favour of the unsecured one called "Netgear" that was in the vicinity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>On of the APs local to me is called " IWillSniffYourPackets " or some such ( I 'm not at home right now to check ) .
For the time that my SSID was not hidden ( for some reason the old man 's laptop refused to connect to the AP if the name was n't visible , a problem that went away when the AP died and was replaced ) I used " ReceptionError " figuring people would bypass a secured AP with a name that implied it would n't work in favour of the unsecured one called " Netgear " that was in the vicinity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On of the APs local to me is called "IWillSniffYourPackets" or some such (I'm not at home right now to check).
For the time that my SSID was not hidden (for some reason the old man's laptop refused to connect to the AP if the name wasn't visible, a problem that went away when the AP died and was replaced) I used "ReceptionError" figuring people would bypass a secured AP with a name that implied it wouldn't work in favour of the unsecured one called "Netgear" that was in the vicinity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273116</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267118760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow. I bet your wife has no idea what a complete and utter wankstain of a human being you are.<br> <br>

And from the tone of your post it seems you actually expect some people to admire your actions. Sad. Very, very, sad.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow .
I bet your wife has no idea what a complete and utter wankstain of a human being you are .
And from the tone of your post it seems you actually expect some people to admire your actions .
Sad. Very , very , sad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow.
I bet your wife has no idea what a complete and utter wankstain of a human being you are.
And from the tone of your post it seems you actually expect some people to admire your actions.
Sad. Very, very, sad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272318</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267114860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is acting like a dick.  It's not his fault you can't configure your wife's laptop, and it's not his fault that he didn't know how to lock down his router.<br>
What did your little episode teach him?  To come ask the asshole next door (who hacks his system on the sly to annoy him) next time his computer has a problem?  Why not just ask him to do it nicely, or offer in the first place?  Oh yeah, because you wanted to harass him and make money out of him.  Nice.
<br>
Hope your plumber/mechanic/etc neighbours pull the same trick on you sometime.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is acting like a dick .
It 's not his fault you ca n't configure your wife 's laptop , and it 's not his fault that he did n't know how to lock down his router .
What did your little episode teach him ?
To come ask the asshole next door ( who hacks his system on the sly to annoy him ) next time his computer has a problem ?
Why not just ask him to do it nicely , or offer in the first place ?
Oh yeah , because you wanted to harass him and make money out of him .
Nice . Hope your plumber/mechanic/etc neighbours pull the same trick on you sometime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is acting like a dick.
It's not his fault you can't configure your wife's laptop, and it's not his fault that he didn't know how to lock down his router.
What did your little episode teach him?
To come ask the asshole next door (who hacks his system on the sly to annoy him) next time his computer has a problem?
Why not just ask him to do it nicely, or offer in the first place?
Oh yeah, because you wanted to harass him and make money out of him.
Nice.

Hope your plumber/mechanic/etc neighbours pull the same trick on you sometime.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272058</id>
	<title>Re:Or.</title>
	<author>smartr</author>
	<datestamp>1267113180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I personally would feel better leeching from a secure connection than my local "tranny hub".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I personally would feel better leeching from a secure connection than my local " tranny hub " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I personally would feel better leeching from a secure connection than my local "tranny hub".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272426</id>
	<title>In my vicinity...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267115460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...there's an AP called "banislam". I find it agreeable. I also love censorship. Don't you,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...there 's an AP called " banislam " .
I find it agreeable .
I also love censorship .
Do n't you , / .
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...there's an AP called "banislam".
I find it agreeable.
I also love censorship.
Don't you, /.
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272570</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267116120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once you've gotten over how "awesome" you are, you can read this article which discusses configuring wireless adapters on Windows XP.</p><p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/wlan\_client\_configure.mspx?mfr=true" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/wlan\_client\_configure.mspx?mfr=true</a> [microsoft.com]</p><p>Rather than wasting time (yours, the neighbors, Best Buy's, tech support....) you can disable automatically connecting to non-preferred networks to fix your wife's security problem and annoyance. And then by telling your neighbor what's up, you reduce the attack surface in your neighborhood...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once you 've gotten over how " awesome " you are , you can read this article which discusses configuring wireless adapters on Windows XP.http : //www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/wlan \ _client \ _configure.mspx ? mfr = true [ microsoft.com ] Rather than wasting time ( yours , the neighbors , Best Buy 's , tech support.... ) you can disable automatically connecting to non-preferred networks to fix your wife 's security problem and annoyance .
And then by telling your neighbor what 's up , you reduce the attack surface in your neighborhood.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once you've gotten over how "awesome" you are, you can read this article which discusses configuring wireless adapters on Windows XP.http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/wlan\_client\_configure.mspx?mfr=true [microsoft.com]Rather than wasting time (yours, the neighbors, Best Buy's, tech support....) you can disable automatically connecting to non-preferred networks to fix your wife's security problem and annoyance.
And then by telling your neighbor what's up, you reduce the attack surface in your neighborhood...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271830</id>
	<title>Best way to deal with this is good old Cat5.</title>
	<author>Rod Beauvex</author>
	<datestamp>1267111860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd like to see my neighboor get into my wired network.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like to see my neighboor get into my wired network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd like to see my neighboor get into my wired network.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31280414</id>
	<title>Re:Or.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267107660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not call noise complaints on them for the frequent screaming fights?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not call noise complaints on them for the frequent screaming fights ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not call noise complaints on them for the frequent screaming fights?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31274984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272330</id>
	<title>Did anyone notice....</title>
	<author>bickerdyke</author>
	<datestamp>1267114920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>some of these screenshotes were made while beeing connected to the not open "passive-agressive" networks...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>some of these screenshotes were made while beeing connected to the not open " passive-agressive " networks.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>some of these screenshotes were made while beeing connected to the not open "passive-agressive" networks...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272402</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267115340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What kind of asshole takes his own ineptitude out on his neighbor? You have problems making your own computer behave like it should and you "fix" it by making your neighbor pay you to change his configuration? Just connect to his SSID once (or create a network entry manually), then remove the "connect automatically" option in the properties of that network. Your neighbor may be ignorant, but you are ignorant <b>and</b> malicious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What kind of asshole takes his own ineptitude out on his neighbor ?
You have problems making your own computer behave like it should and you " fix " it by making your neighbor pay you to change his configuration ?
Just connect to his SSID once ( or create a network entry manually ) , then remove the " connect automatically " option in the properties of that network .
Your neighbor may be ignorant , but you are ignorant and malicious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What kind of asshole takes his own ineptitude out on his neighbor?
You have problems making your own computer behave like it should and you "fix" it by making your neighbor pay you to change his configuration?
Just connect to his SSID once (or create a network entry manually), then remove the "connect automatically" option in the properties of that network.
Your neighbor may be ignorant, but you are ignorant and malicious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273256</id>
	<title>Re:Or.</title>
	<author>BattleApple</author>
	<datestamp>1267119480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>he should flip the text upside down too..
<a href="http://www.fliptext.org/" title="fliptext.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.fliptext.org/</a> [fliptext.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>he should flip the text upside down too. . http : //www.fliptext.org/ [ fliptext.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>he should flip the text upside down too..
http://www.fliptext.org/ [fliptext.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272592</id>
	<title>I HATE your fucking yappy-ass dogs!</title>
	<author>EXrider</author>
	<datestamp>1267116180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>My primary SSID is WPA2 encrypted, but I have an open one called <i>I HATE your fucking yappy-ass dogs!</i> that redirects all requests to <a href="http://www.daisy.com/" title="daisy.com">daisy.com</a> [daisy.com]; as a shoutout to all my dumbfuck neighbors that buy multiple dogs and leave them outside yapping for hours at a time.  Thanks DD-WRT!</htmltext>
<tokenext>My primary SSID is WPA2 encrypted , but I have an open one called I HATE your fucking yappy-ass dogs !
that redirects all requests to daisy.com [ daisy.com ] ; as a shoutout to all my dumbfuck neighbors that buy multiple dogs and leave them outside yapping for hours at a time .
Thanks DD-WRT !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My primary SSID is WPA2 encrypted, but I have an open one called I HATE your fucking yappy-ass dogs!
that redirects all requests to daisy.com [daisy.com]; as a shoutout to all my dumbfuck neighbors that buy multiple dogs and leave them outside yapping for hours at a time.
Thanks DD-WRT!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273442</id>
	<title>SSID="AnonymousCoward"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267120020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's only fitting that my SSID is "AnonymousCoward"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's only fitting that my SSID is " AnonymousCoward "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's only fitting that my SSID is "AnonymousCoward"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273050</id>
	<title>Somebody's got a sense of humor....</title>
	<author>LVSlushdat</author>
	<datestamp>1267118400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I found a funny one while sitting at a Starbucks.. DEATH STAR PEW PEW.. Was planning to use my free two hours on the att node, but what the heck? Wide open, and no two hour limit... Of course, I always have my OpenVPN connection to my home network up and use the squid proxy there to keep me protected...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I found a funny one while sitting at a Starbucks.. DEATH STAR PEW PEW.. Was planning to use my free two hours on the att node , but what the heck ?
Wide open , and no two hour limit... Of course , I always have my OpenVPN connection to my home network up and use the squid proxy there to keep me protected.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I found a funny one while sitting at a Starbucks.. DEATH STAR PEW PEW.. Was planning to use my free two hours on the att node, but what the heck?
Wide open, and no two hour limit... Of course, I always have my OpenVPN connection to my home network up and use the squid proxy there to keep me protected...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272048</id>
	<title>Funny Names I have Used</title>
	<author>Jonah Hex</author>
	<datestamp>1267113120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My favorite is "PirateHacker", which I hope scares the shit out of someone. I've also used "Unknown" and "ImWatchingYou"</p><p>HEX</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My favorite is " PirateHacker " , which I hope scares the shit out of someone .
I 've also used " Unknown " and " ImWatchingYou " HEX</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My favorite is "PirateHacker", which I hope scares the shit out of someone.
I've also used "Unknown" and "ImWatchingYou"HEX</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272678</id>
	<title>Re:Or Even Funnier</title>
	<author>furby076</author>
	<datestamp>1267116600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How does one set this up on say a Linksys router? Then restrict it so anyone who doesn't have their mac address recorded with me would get the routing.  For example I would want my friends to connect (they give me their MAC), but someone at the coffee shop can bite it.<br> <br>

I would so name my network "FreeNetwork"</htmltext>
<tokenext>How does one set this up on say a Linksys router ?
Then restrict it so anyone who does n't have their mac address recorded with me would get the routing .
For example I would want my friends to connect ( they give me their MAC ) , but someone at the coffee shop can bite it .
I would so name my network " FreeNetwork "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does one set this up on say a Linksys router?
Then restrict it so anyone who doesn't have their mac address recorded with me would get the routing.
For example I would want my friends to connect (they give me their MAC), but someone at the coffee shop can bite it.
I would so name my network "FreeNetwork"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272214</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>pak9rabid</author>
	<datestamp>1267114320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I mean, how hard would it really be if every router shipped with a unique SSID and a default random password?</p></div><p>Not very..AT&amp;T has been managing this with their CPEs for at least 4 years.  They simply use the serial # printed on the CPE as the default password.  Unique and not likely to be guessed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , how hard would it really be if every router shipped with a unique SSID and a default random password ? Not very..AT&amp;T has been managing this with their CPEs for at least 4 years .
They simply use the serial # printed on the CPE as the default password .
Unique and not likely to be guessed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, how hard would it really be if every router shipped with a unique SSID and a default random password?Not very..AT&amp;T has been managing this with their CPEs for at least 4 years.
They simply use the serial # printed on the CPE as the default password.
Unique and not likely to be guessed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272396</id>
	<title>Seriously?</title>
	<author>d34dluk3</author>
	<datestamp>1267115340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>there is now a better solution than suffering in silence</p></div><p>This is the better solution!? Who the hell that's on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. doesn't know how to name their hotspot!?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>there is now a better solution than suffering in silenceThis is the better solution ! ?
Who the hell that 's on / .
does n't know how to name their hotspot !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there is now a better solution than suffering in silenceThis is the better solution!?
Who the hell that's on /.
doesn't know how to name their hotspot!
?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272872</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1267117620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"serial" and "not likely to be guessed" really don't go anywhere in the same sentence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" serial " and " not likely to be guessed " really do n't go anywhere in the same sentence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"serial" and "not likely to be guessed" really don't go anywhere in the same sentence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31274626</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>retro128</author>
	<datestamp>1267123860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hang on a second.  All wireless clients I've see do not automatically connect to an SSID unless its already set up in the wireless profile.  The only way I could see the scenario you describe possibly happening is if you and your neighbor had matching SSIDs.  Did it occur to you to change yours?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hang on a second .
All wireless clients I 've see do not automatically connect to an SSID unless its already set up in the wireless profile .
The only way I could see the scenario you describe possibly happening is if you and your neighbor had matching SSIDs .
Did it occur to you to change yours ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hang on a second.
All wireless clients I've see do not automatically connect to an SSID unless its already set up in the wireless profile.
The only way I could see the scenario you describe possibly happening is if you and your neighbor had matching SSIDs.
Did it occur to you to change yours?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272372</id>
	<title>Re:Best way to deal with this is good old Cat5.</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1267115160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'd like to see my neighboor get into my wired network.</p></div><p>It's easy to get your wish granted. Just invite him to your flat, tell him to bring his laptop with him, and then offer him a cable to connect. Make sure you watch him while he gets into your wired network, because if you don't, you'll probably not see it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like to see my neighboor get into my wired network.It 's easy to get your wish granted .
Just invite him to your flat , tell him to bring his laptop with him , and then offer him a cable to connect .
Make sure you watch him while he gets into your wired network , because if you do n't , you 'll probably not see it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd like to see my neighboor get into my wired network.It's easy to get your wish granted.
Just invite him to your flat, tell him to bring his laptop with him, and then offer him a cable to connect.
Make sure you watch him while he gets into your wired network, because if you don't, you'll probably not see it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273034</id>
	<title>Relevant Link:</title>
	<author>2obvious4u</author>
	<datestamp>1267118400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.urlesque.com/2010/02/23/leo-laporte-woman-steals-wireless/" title="urlesque.com">You will find this funny.</a> [urlesque.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>You will find this funny .
[ urlesque.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You will find this funny.
[urlesque.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272276</id>
	<title>fbi.gov</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267114560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My neighbor's is named:</p><p>fbi.gov</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My neighbor 's is named : fbi.gov</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My neighbor's is named:fbi.gov</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272826</id>
	<title>why not make some cache?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267117500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't it be better to redirect them through some sort of rotating proxy list each with a URL to one of your ads?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't it be better to redirect them through some sort of rotating proxy list each with a URL to one of your ads ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't it be better to redirect them through some sort of rotating proxy list each with a URL to one of your ads?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271974</id>
	<title>Or Even Funnier</title>
	<author>DaMattster</author>
	<datestamp>1267112760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Set up your devices with static addresses and set a dhcp scope above the addresses that you need.  Then you transparently redirect any http request originating from the dhcp scope to say, www.google.com (or something nastier to be left to your imagination), using the power of iptables.  Now, no matter what website the piggy backer tries to visit, he will be greeted with the ubiquitous google.com home page.  Watch how quickly the neighbors will learn to leave your network alone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Set up your devices with static addresses and set a dhcp scope above the addresses that you need .
Then you transparently redirect any http request originating from the dhcp scope to say , www.google.com ( or something nastier to be left to your imagination ) , using the power of iptables .
Now , no matter what website the piggy backer tries to visit , he will be greeted with the ubiquitous google.com home page .
Watch how quickly the neighbors will learn to leave your network alone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Set up your devices with static addresses and set a dhcp scope above the addresses that you need.
Then you transparently redirect any http request originating from the dhcp scope to say, www.google.com (or something nastier to be left to your imagination), using the power of iptables.
Now, no matter what website the piggy backer tries to visit, he will be greeted with the ubiquitous google.com home page.
Watch how quickly the neighbors will learn to leave your network alone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794</id>
	<title>Or.</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1267111620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or you could...you know...actually secure your wifi.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or you could...you know...actually secure your wifi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or you could...you know...actually secure your wifi.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31276000</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>religious freak</author>
	<datestamp>1267128840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You had all kinds of opportunities to do this right, but instead you consistently choose to be a passive aggressive dick to a guy who didn't even have any idea he was doing something which was not completely perfect.  Nice job.  <br> <br>
Not only that, but you didn't even have to actively help him, you could've just properly configured your wife's XP computer.  Good luck in life dude, I'm guessing it sucks for you... perhaps for good reason.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You had all kinds of opportunities to do this right , but instead you consistently choose to be a passive aggressive dick to a guy who did n't even have any idea he was doing something which was not completely perfect .
Nice job .
Not only that , but you did n't even have to actively help him , you could 've just properly configured your wife 's XP computer .
Good luck in life dude , I 'm guessing it sucks for you... perhaps for good reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You had all kinds of opportunities to do this right, but instead you consistently choose to be a passive aggressive dick to a guy who didn't even have any idea he was doing something which was not completely perfect.
Nice job.
Not only that, but you didn't even have to actively help him, you could've just properly configured your wife's XP computer.
Good luck in life dude, I'm guessing it sucks for you... perhaps for good reason.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271950</id>
	<title>Re:You don't really need to be a jerk</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267112640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why you gotta be all sensible and stuff?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why you got ta be all sensible and stuff ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why you gotta be all sensible and stuff?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272718</id>
	<title>Re:Funny Names I have Used</title>
	<author>blinking\_at</author>
	<datestamp>1267116900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"TrojanVirus" is a name I have seen...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" TrojanVirus " is a name I have seen.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"TrojanVirus" is a name I have seen...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273718</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>Jah-Wren Ryel</author>
	<datestamp>1267120980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can get one of the WRT versions running on the verizon router now - don't remember if it is OpenWRT, DD-WRT, Tomato or another one.  In any case, the router hardware is great - lots of cpu horsepower.  Just s really stupid NAT table size...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can get one of the WRT versions running on the verizon router now - do n't remember if it is OpenWRT , DD-WRT , Tomato or another one .
In any case , the router hardware is great - lots of cpu horsepower .
Just s really stupid NAT table size.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can get one of the WRT versions running on the verizon router now - don't remember if it is OpenWRT, DD-WRT, Tomato or another one.
In any case, the router hardware is great - lots of cpu horsepower.
Just s really stupid NAT table size...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272192</id>
	<title>Other SSID</title>
	<author>Ostracus</author>
	<datestamp>1267114140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"And that creating a "guest" open network was limited only to the most expensive and corporate models that had multiple SSID and radio support (secure or nothing configuration)? "</p><p><a href="http://www.netgear.com/Products/RoutersandGateways/WirelessNRoutersandGateways/WNDR3700.aspx" title="netgear.com">Multiple SSID</a> [netgear.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" And that creating a " guest " open network was limited only to the most expensive and corporate models that had multiple SSID and radio support ( secure or nothing configuration ) ?
" Multiple SSID [ netgear.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"And that creating a "guest" open network was limited only to the most expensive and corporate models that had multiple SSID and radio support (secure or nothing configuration)?
"Multiple SSID [netgear.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31280048</id>
	<title>Re:Or.</title>
	<author>antdude</author>
	<datestamp>1267104720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always wanted to set up a fake wifi hotspot that acts like a honeypot to collect wireless connections and see what nearby people try to do with it.</p><p>I never found the free time to do it. I assume it's easy since it only requires a WAP.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always wanted to set up a fake wifi hotspot that acts like a honeypot to collect wireless connections and see what nearby people try to do with it.I never found the free time to do it .
I assume it 's easy since it only requires a WAP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always wanted to set up a fake wifi hotspot that acts like a honeypot to collect wireless connections and see what nearby people try to do with it.I never found the free time to do it.
I assume it's easy since it only requires a WAP.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31274944</id>
	<title>Re:You don't really need to be a jerk</title>
	<author>sans17</author>
	<datestamp>1267124880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have moved several times in last years and every time first weeks I got connection from an open neighbor. Till you get phone, then provider, then find time to set up your own network.</p><p>So, the last time after finally settled I added an open node to my router.<br>DNS, HTTP and HTTPS only. Cut down on speed.<br>Well, might be it will help somebody.</p><p>Free internet!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have moved several times in last years and every time first weeks I got connection from an open neighbor .
Till you get phone , then provider , then find time to set up your own network.So , the last time after finally settled I added an open node to my router.DNS , HTTP and HTTPS only .
Cut down on speed.Well , might be it will help somebody.Free internet !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have moved several times in last years and every time first weeks I got connection from an open neighbor.
Till you get phone, then provider, then find time to set up your own network.So, the last time after finally settled I added an open node to my router.DNS, HTTP and HTTPS only.
Cut down on speed.Well, might be it will help somebody.Free internet!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31281110</id>
	<title>Re:You don't really need to be a jerk</title>
	<author>fm6</author>
	<datestamp>1267114800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Like in driving, it's often stupid and dangerous to fight *ssholes by acting like one yourself, thinking you're going to teach them a lesson.</p></div><p>Very true, though it takes more willpower accept this idea than most people have.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I run an open AP named "nohup", since it's on a UPS and is often the only one still running when the power goes out. (Unfortunately, Verizon FIOS's upstream UPS goes out after 5-10 minutes nowadays</p></div><p>And a good thing it does. The lead-acid batteries in most UPSs wear out quickly if you keep running them down. Up go your replacement costs and the risk the UPS isn't there when you really need to do a clean shutdown.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Like in driving , it 's often stupid and dangerous to fight * ssholes by acting like one yourself , thinking you 're going to teach them a lesson.Very true , though it takes more willpower accept this idea than most people have.I run an open AP named " nohup " , since it 's on a UPS and is often the only one still running when the power goes out .
( Unfortunately , Verizon FIOS 's upstream UPS goes out after 5-10 minutes nowadaysAnd a good thing it does .
The lead-acid batteries in most UPSs wear out quickly if you keep running them down .
Up go your replacement costs and the risk the UPS is n't there when you really need to do a clean shutdown .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like in driving, it's often stupid and dangerous to fight *ssholes by acting like one yourself, thinking you're going to teach them a lesson.Very true, though it takes more willpower accept this idea than most people have.I run an open AP named "nohup", since it's on a UPS and is often the only one still running when the power goes out.
(Unfortunately, Verizon FIOS's upstream UPS goes out after 5-10 minutes nowadaysAnd a good thing it does.
The lead-acid batteries in most UPSs wear out quickly if you keep running them down.
Up go your replacement costs and the risk the UPS isn't there when you really need to do a clean shutdown.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31275684</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>johncadengo</author>
	<datestamp>1267127700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kind of sad. Your story has holes all over the place.</p><p>If you had access to his router, you should've been able to easily solve the problem. Rather, you <i>chose</i> to be a jerk. I love how you play the victim, as if you were helpless and powerless to do anything but what you did.</p><p>To sum up what other posters have suggested, and points you have not refuted all throughout this thread:<br>1) You claim your wife's wireless insisted on connecting to his router. But you did not for one moment consider that since you had access to his router you could've easily went into the settings and blocked your wife's MAC address. Again, according to your claims, this guy was an idiot. He would not have noticed at all.<br>2) You claim you could not fix your wife's laptop because replacing it would cost $2,000. Buy a USB wifi dongle, disable proprietary wifi. $20.<br>3) If he had changed the router, then why was your wife's computer still insisting on connecting to it, rather than your own router? PEBKAC.</p><p>Plank eyes are not very good for seeing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kind of sad .
Your story has holes all over the place.If you had access to his router , you should 've been able to easily solve the problem .
Rather , you chose to be a jerk .
I love how you play the victim , as if you were helpless and powerless to do anything but what you did.To sum up what other posters have suggested , and points you have not refuted all throughout this thread : 1 ) You claim your wife 's wireless insisted on connecting to his router .
But you did not for one moment consider that since you had access to his router you could 've easily went into the settings and blocked your wife 's MAC address .
Again , according to your claims , this guy was an idiot .
He would not have noticed at all.2 ) You claim you could not fix your wife 's laptop because replacing it would cost $ 2,000 .
Buy a USB wifi dongle , disable proprietary wifi .
$ 20.3 ) If he had changed the router , then why was your wife 's computer still insisting on connecting to it , rather than your own router ?
PEBKAC.Plank eyes are not very good for seeing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kind of sad.
Your story has holes all over the place.If you had access to his router, you should've been able to easily solve the problem.
Rather, you chose to be a jerk.
I love how you play the victim, as if you were helpless and powerless to do anything but what you did.To sum up what other posters have suggested, and points you have not refuted all throughout this thread:1) You claim your wife's wireless insisted on connecting to his router.
But you did not for one moment consider that since you had access to his router you could've easily went into the settings and blocked your wife's MAC address.
Again, according to your claims, this guy was an idiot.
He would not have noticed at all.2) You claim you could not fix your wife's laptop because replacing it would cost $2,000.
Buy a USB wifi dongle, disable proprietary wifi.
$20.3) If he had changed the router, then why was your wife's computer still insisting on connecting to it, rather than your own router?
PEBKAC.Plank eyes are not very good for seeing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31278672</id>
	<title>Sweet!</title>
	<author>DRAGONWEEZEL</author>
	<datestamp>1267096440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a 2 tier wep / wpa2 tkip setup that I'd love to do this on the wep side.  The wep is actually a "Guest" router for friends and family.  The wpa2 side is for my work laptop, the zune, and the netflix box.</p><p>I know some kid has been on my network before, because his dad TOLD ME!  But it wasn't secure then (not that wep is) it would be fun to set up something like this, or proxy to a page containing the whole web, three pages of it.  The "allowed" web pages could be a rickroll, slashdot, and my website only.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a 2 tier wep / wpa2 tkip setup that I 'd love to do this on the wep side .
The wep is actually a " Guest " router for friends and family .
The wpa2 side is for my work laptop , the zune , and the netflix box.I know some kid has been on my network before , because his dad TOLD ME !
But it was n't secure then ( not that wep is ) it would be fun to set up something like this , or proxy to a page containing the whole web , three pages of it .
The " allowed " web pages could be a rickroll , slashdot , and my website only .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a 2 tier wep / wpa2 tkip setup that I'd love to do this on the wep side.
The wep is actually a "Guest" router for friends and family.
The wpa2 side is for my work laptop, the zune, and the netflix box.I know some kid has been on my network before, because his dad TOLD ME!
But it wasn't secure then (not that wep is) it would be fun to set up something like this, or proxy to a page containing the whole web, three pages of it.
The "allowed" web pages could be a rickroll, slashdot, and my website only.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272158</id>
	<title>Sounds like a job for a VAP</title>
	<author>pak9rabid</author>
	<datestamp>1267113900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Finally, a fun use for my wifi card's VAP functionality =D.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , a fun use for my wifi card 's VAP functionality = D .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, a fun use for my wifi card's VAP functionality =D.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272474</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>pebs</author>
	<datestamp>1267115700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Holy crap, why didn't you just talk to your neighbor to begin with?  Talk about passive aggressive.  The real moron here is the one who couldn't get the laptop to ignore a wifi network.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Holy crap , why did n't you just talk to your neighbor to begin with ?
Talk about passive aggressive .
The real moron here is the one who could n't get the laptop to ignore a wifi network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Holy crap, why didn't you just talk to your neighbor to begin with?
Talk about passive aggressive.
The real moron here is the one who couldn't get the laptop to ignore a wifi network.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272666</id>
	<title>Wacky college students in our condo complex</title>
	<author>Abies Bracteata</author>
	<datestamp>1267116540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Their wireless hot-spot celebrates "Toby's" partying habits with this SSID:  "Toby has a drinking problem"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Their wireless hot-spot celebrates " Toby 's " partying habits with this SSID : " Toby has a drinking problem "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their wireless hot-spot celebrates "Toby's" partying habits with this SSID:  "Toby has a drinking problem"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272370</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267115160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In one sense you seem smart, so why don't you see and resolve what was really a problem with your wife's laptop? Instead you become part of an on-going problem, casuing many people hassle. Shame on you!</p><p>Why could you not set it up, or speak to the business IT department and get help?</p><p>If you're that worried about security, why don't you take the time to understand what is actually happening on your wife's laptop. Do you know how the VPN authentication is achieved?</p><p>http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc759686(WS.10).aspx</p><p>Anyway, I can't believe you blame your neighbour? Amazing the way some people hide from the real truth!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In one sense you seem smart , so why do n't you see and resolve what was really a problem with your wife 's laptop ?
Instead you become part of an on-going problem , casuing many people hassle .
Shame on you ! Why could you not set it up , or speak to the business IT department and get help ? If you 're that worried about security , why do n't you take the time to understand what is actually happening on your wife 's laptop .
Do you know how the VPN authentication is achieved ? http : //technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc759686 ( WS.10 ) .aspxAnyway , I ca n't believe you blame your neighbour ?
Amazing the way some people hide from the real truth !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In one sense you seem smart, so why don't you see and resolve what was really a problem with your wife's laptop?
Instead you become part of an on-going problem, casuing many people hassle.
Shame on you!Why could you not set it up, or speak to the business IT department and get help?If you're that worried about security, why don't you take the time to understand what is actually happening on your wife's laptop.
Do you know how the VPN authentication is achieved?http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc759686(WS.10).aspxAnyway, I can't believe you blame your neighbour?
Amazing the way some people hide from the real truth!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31315332</id>
	<title>Re:Or.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267456260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>My wifi is normally secured, but I have some neighbors that are always trying to login. I see their attempts in the router logs and I open the router up every so often just to have fun. I set the broadcast name to "passw0rd" and changed to that password. Sure enough, they immediately log in with that key. I've set the router to deny all traffic except through my squid proxy and all pages redirect to the proxy welcome page until then.  I don't care for their personal content, but it's interesting seeing the URLs that show up in the proxy. Many of them set cookies or use other auth so I can't see their content (at least not without changing some settings) but a good percentage use URL encoding so I can pull up their personal sites.  The neighbors bounce a lot between facebook, gmail and some news sites. Oh and porn. The bastards watch a lot of porn. I'm probably going to start redirecting those sites to the GOP homepage or a rickroll at some point You can do this by subscribing squid to one of the blocklist sites. Nothing like a dated meme to piss off the neighbors.</p><p>Setup of the squid proxy took a few hours.. hardest part was the DNS redirect until they connect to the proxy, but there's tons of instructions now for doing it...</p></div><p>Would you care to write a HOWTO that describes what you did? I would like to do the same, but I would rather not have to use a lot of time reading up on squid.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My wifi is normally secured , but I have some neighbors that are always trying to login .
I see their attempts in the router logs and I open the router up every so often just to have fun .
I set the broadcast name to " passw0rd " and changed to that password .
Sure enough , they immediately log in with that key .
I 've set the router to deny all traffic except through my squid proxy and all pages redirect to the proxy welcome page until then .
I do n't care for their personal content , but it 's interesting seeing the URLs that show up in the proxy .
Many of them set cookies or use other auth so I ca n't see their content ( at least not without changing some settings ) but a good percentage use URL encoding so I can pull up their personal sites .
The neighbors bounce a lot between facebook , gmail and some news sites .
Oh and porn .
The bastards watch a lot of porn .
I 'm probably going to start redirecting those sites to the GOP homepage or a rickroll at some point You can do this by subscribing squid to one of the blocklist sites .
Nothing like a dated meme to piss off the neighbors.Setup of the squid proxy took a few hours.. hardest part was the DNS redirect until they connect to the proxy , but there 's tons of instructions now for doing it...Would you care to write a HOWTO that describes what you did ?
I would like to do the same , but I would rather not have to use a lot of time reading up on squid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My wifi is normally secured, but I have some neighbors that are always trying to login.
I see their attempts in the router logs and I open the router up every so often just to have fun.
I set the broadcast name to "passw0rd" and changed to that password.
Sure enough, they immediately log in with that key.
I've set the router to deny all traffic except through my squid proxy and all pages redirect to the proxy welcome page until then.
I don't care for their personal content, but it's interesting seeing the URLs that show up in the proxy.
Many of them set cookies or use other auth so I can't see their content (at least not without changing some settings) but a good percentage use URL encoding so I can pull up their personal sites.
The neighbors bounce a lot between facebook, gmail and some news sites.
Oh and porn.
The bastards watch a lot of porn.
I'm probably going to start redirecting those sites to the GOP homepage or a rickroll at some point You can do this by subscribing squid to one of the blocklist sites.
Nothing like a dated meme to piss off the neighbors.Setup of the squid proxy took a few hours.. hardest part was the DNS redirect until they connect to the proxy, but there's tons of instructions now for doing it...Would you care to write a HOWTO that describes what you did?
I would like to do the same, but I would rather not have to use a lot of time reading up on squid.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272478</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267115700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So in summary, you were being an asshole for your own kicks, when you clearly could have solved his problem and garnered goodwill. Instead you chose to dick with him repeatedly for days/weeks on end. He may be a "computer moron" but you're just a cruel jackass. As others have said, I too find it ironic that you call your neighbor a 'computer moron' and you couldn't prevent your wife's laptop from connecting to his network.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So in summary , you were being an asshole for your own kicks , when you clearly could have solved his problem and garnered goodwill .
Instead you chose to dick with him repeatedly for days/weeks on end .
He may be a " computer moron " but you 're just a cruel jackass .
As others have said , I too find it ironic that you call your neighbor a 'computer moron ' and you could n't prevent your wife 's laptop from connecting to his network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So in summary, you were being an asshole for your own kicks, when you clearly could have solved his problem and garnered goodwill.
Instead you chose to dick with him repeatedly for days/weeks on end.
He may be a "computer moron" but you're just a cruel jackass.
As others have said, I too find it ironic that you call your neighbor a 'computer moron' and you couldn't prevent your wife's laptop from connecting to his network.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31274394</id>
	<title>Re:Or Even Funnier</title>
	<author>Technician</author>
	<datestamp>1267123200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a second router for "leeches"  It is unsecured and not connected to anything.  It does get connections from time to time.  It has DHCP, DNS, and such all set.  It has activity quite often as most routers in my area are secure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a second router for " leeches " It is unsecured and not connected to anything .
It does get connections from time to time .
It has DHCP , DNS , and such all set .
It has activity quite often as most routers in my area are secure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a second router for "leeches"  It is unsecured and not connected to anything.
It does get connections from time to time.
It has DHCP, DNS, and such all set.
It has activity quite often as most routers in my area are secure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272558</id>
	<title>A dupe, and not even a good one</title>
	<author>damn\_registrars</author>
	<datestamp>1267116060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We've seen this before, ways to push people away from your WiFi without actually securing it.  But previously we had creative things to do with the users, like reversing their pages or directing everything to pictures of kittens.  This isn't anywhere nearly as inspired.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 've seen this before , ways to push people away from your WiFi without actually securing it .
But previously we had creative things to do with the users , like reversing their pages or directing everything to pictures of kittens .
This is n't anywhere nearly as inspired .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We've seen this before, ways to push people away from your WiFi without actually securing it.
But previously we had creative things to do with the users, like reversing their pages or directing everything to pictures of kittens.
This isn't anywhere nearly as inspired.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272068</id>
	<title>Exactly.  Using open wifi is not stealing.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267113240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you leave it open and people use it, that's not stealing. DUH</p><p>Every time someone makes that ridiculous assertion about stealing, baby Seattle Wireless cries.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you leave it open and people use it , that 's not stealing .
DUHEvery time someone makes that ridiculous assertion about stealing , baby Seattle Wireless cries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you leave it open and people use it, that's not stealing.
DUHEvery time someone makes that ridiculous assertion about stealing, baby Seattle Wireless cries.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273006</id>
	<title>Re:Funny Names I have Used</title>
	<author>satoshi1</author>
	<datestamp>1267118220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mine is currently "iwillkillyouall" after I kept noticing other machines on my network.  I've sinced MAC secured it, but the name still sticks.  I think that once I move to my next apartment I'll name it something a little better, though I have no ideas yet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mine is currently " iwillkillyouall " after I kept noticing other machines on my network .
I 've sinced MAC secured it , but the name still sticks .
I think that once I move to my next apartment I 'll name it something a little better , though I have no ideas yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mine is currently "iwillkillyouall" after I kept noticing other machines on my network.
I've sinced MAC secured it, but the name still sticks.
I think that once I move to my next apartment I'll name it something a little better, though I have no ideas yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273630</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>Asic Eng</author>
	<datestamp>1267120740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>So what you're saying is that you can't maintain control over your own computers</i> <p>
Well in fairness: he did manage to maintain control over his computers. He shut down his neighbors network to do it (which is not very nice) but he ultimately he got the result he desired.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So what you 're saying is that you ca n't maintain control over your own computers Well in fairness : he did manage to maintain control over his computers .
He shut down his neighbors network to do it ( which is not very nice ) but he ultimately he got the result he desired .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what you're saying is that you can't maintain control over your own computers 
Well in fairness: he did manage to maintain control over his computers.
He shut down his neighbors network to do it (which is not very nice) but he ultimately he got the result he desired.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272638</id>
	<title>Re:Or.</title>
	<author>furby076</author>
	<datestamp>1267116420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Network Name "PedoLocalChapter15"<br> <br>

Is it possible to setup a router (e.g. linksys, netgear) to do annoying pop-ups on people's computers who are not on a MAC list?  So if someone connects to my network they get a pop-up every X time....I would so spam them, every 3 seconds, with pop-ups to various animal porn sites</htmltext>
<tokenext>Network Name " PedoLocalChapter15 " Is it possible to setup a router ( e.g .
linksys , netgear ) to do annoying pop-ups on people 's computers who are not on a MAC list ?
So if someone connects to my network they get a pop-up every X time....I would so spam them , every 3 seconds , with pop-ups to various animal porn sites</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Network Name "PedoLocalChapter15" 

Is it possible to setup a router (e.g.
linksys, netgear) to do annoying pop-ups on people's computers who are not on a MAC list?
So if someone connects to my network they get a pop-up every X time....I would so spam them, every 3 seconds, with pop-ups to various animal porn sites</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272220</id>
	<title>Spaces are allowed in SSIDs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267114320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SSIDs are up to 32 characters long and may contain any 8-bit character you want. There is no need to CamelCase or justconcatenateitall. If you're going to be passive-aggressive instead of (or in addition to) simply securing your access point, at least make your message readable. IMHO, anyone offering OR using unsecured wireless LANs without proper encryption on top gets what they deserve.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SSIDs are up to 32 characters long and may contain any 8-bit character you want .
There is no need to CamelCase or justconcatenateitall .
If you 're going to be passive-aggressive instead of ( or in addition to ) simply securing your access point , at least make your message readable .
IMHO , anyone offering OR using unsecured wireless LANs without proper encryption on top gets what they deserve .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SSIDs are up to 32 characters long and may contain any 8-bit character you want.
There is no need to CamelCase or justconcatenateitall.
If you're going to be passive-aggressive instead of (or in addition to) simply securing your access point, at least make your message readable.
IMHO, anyone offering OR using unsecured wireless LANs without proper encryption on top gets what they deserve.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271906</id>
	<title>You don't really need to be on Youtube.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267112280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>."If you still really want to dick with people, at least do something more technically interesting with transparent proxy hacks, such as https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Upside-Down-TernetHowTo  [ubuntu.com] or running it through a Swedish Chef filter or the ilk."</p><p>Or Rickroll them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.
" If you still really want to dick with people , at least do something more technically interesting with transparent proxy hacks , such as https : //help.ubuntu.com/community/Upside-Down-TernetHowTo [ ubuntu.com ] or running it through a Swedish Chef filter or the ilk .
" Or Rickroll them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.
"If you still really want to dick with people, at least do something more technically interesting with transparent proxy hacks, such as https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Upside-Down-TernetHowTo  [ubuntu.com] or running it through a Swedish Chef filter or the ilk.
"Or Rickroll them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272248</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>lowrydr310</author>
	<datestamp>1267114440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I mean, how hard would it really be if every router shipped with a unique SSID and a default random password?</p></div> </blockquote><p>
The routers that verizon hands out with their FiOS service do exactly this. They have a unique 6 character hexadecimal string as the SSID, and each has a unique WEP password that's printed on the bottom of the router on a sticker.
</p><p>
Now I know this isn't perfect (WEP security limitations aside), but it's sure as hell better than every single customer in my apartment complex having "Linksys" or "Netgear" access points with no encryption and default passwords.
</p><p>
I quickly ran into a limitation on the size of the NAT with this freebie router so I run my own router as the primary, and simply use the Verizon device as a bridge/media converter so my set top box can obtain guide info and IPTV (on-demand video) since it only has a coax interface.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , how hard would it really be if every router shipped with a unique SSID and a default random password ?
The routers that verizon hands out with their FiOS service do exactly this .
They have a unique 6 character hexadecimal string as the SSID , and each has a unique WEP password that 's printed on the bottom of the router on a sticker .
Now I know this is n't perfect ( WEP security limitations aside ) , but it 's sure as hell better than every single customer in my apartment complex having " Linksys " or " Netgear " access points with no encryption and default passwords .
I quickly ran into a limitation on the size of the NAT with this freebie router so I run my own router as the primary , and simply use the Verizon device as a bridge/media converter so my set top box can obtain guide info and IPTV ( on-demand video ) since it only has a coax interface .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, how hard would it really be if every router shipped with a unique SSID and a default random password?
The routers that verizon hands out with their FiOS service do exactly this.
They have a unique 6 character hexadecimal string as the SSID, and each has a unique WEP password that's printed on the bottom of the router on a sticker.
Now I know this isn't perfect (WEP security limitations aside), but it's sure as hell better than every single customer in my apartment complex having "Linksys" or "Netgear" access points with no encryption and default passwords.
I quickly ran into a limitation on the size of the NAT with this freebie router so I run my own router as the primary, and simply use the Verizon device as a bridge/media converter so my set top box can obtain guide info and IPTV (on-demand video) since it only has a coax interface.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272210</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267114260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, in summary: "I am not technically saavy enough to solve the problem so I jerk my neighbors around for fun."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , in summary : " I am not technically saavy enough to solve the problem so I jerk my neighbors around for fun .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, in summary: "I am not technically saavy enough to solve the problem so I jerk my neighbors around for fun.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273456</id>
	<title>thanks for the laugh</title>
	<author>kujokane</author>
	<datestamp>1267120080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dear neighbor,

Thanks for leaving your network unsecured for so many years. I've enjoyed not paying for internet for some time now, and even though you created an ssid that is very funny, I'm still going to use it.....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear neighbor , Thanks for leaving your network unsecured for so many years .
I 've enjoyed not paying for internet for some time now , and even though you created an ssid that is very funny , I 'm still going to use it.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear neighbor,

Thanks for leaving your network unsecured for so many years.
I've enjoyed not paying for internet for some time now, and even though you created an ssid that is very funny, I'm still going to use it.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271822</id>
	<title>spelling correction</title>
	<author>phil42</author>
	<datestamp>1267111800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that is spelled $#!+</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that is spelled $ # ! +</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that is spelled $#!+</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272612</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>operagost</author>
	<datestamp>1267116300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your post is missing the part where you first told your neighbor about the problem and offered to fix his router for free-- you know, because it would have benefited both parties.  I guess all the aggravation and wasted time and gas was worth $50, right?  My mother-in-law had a similar problem (someone moved in who had a router with the same SSID on the same channel) so I changed the SSID, channel, and turned on WPA2 (which I had been looking for an excuse to do for some time).
<p>
I've never had the problem you describe with XP.  I set the rogue SSID to manual connect, and it never bothers me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your post is missing the part where you first told your neighbor about the problem and offered to fix his router for free-- you know , because it would have benefited both parties .
I guess all the aggravation and wasted time and gas was worth $ 50 , right ?
My mother-in-law had a similar problem ( someone moved in who had a router with the same SSID on the same channel ) so I changed the SSID , channel , and turned on WPA2 ( which I had been looking for an excuse to do for some time ) .
I 've never had the problem you describe with XP .
I set the rogue SSID to manual connect , and it never bothers me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your post is missing the part where you first told your neighbor about the problem and offered to fix his router for free-- you know, because it would have benefited both parties.
I guess all the aggravation and wasted time and gas was worth $50, right?
My mother-in-law had a similar problem (someone moved in who had a router with the same SSID on the same channel) so I changed the SSID, channel, and turned on WPA2 (which I had been looking for an excuse to do for some time).
I've never had the problem you describe with XP.
I set the rogue SSID to manual connect, and it never bothers me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272776</id>
	<title>why rename and not secure?</title>
	<author>rkchang</author>
	<datestamp>1267117320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would expect that the most obvious Wi-Fi networks to hop onto are those named "linksys," "netgear," "d-link," etc. If someone knows enough to rename their Wi-Fi network, then theoretically, they should also know how to set up even just a little bit of security. Seriously, even though WEP, WPA, etc. are not perfect, it's a lot better than no security at all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would expect that the most obvious Wi-Fi networks to hop onto are those named " linksys , " " netgear , " " d-link , " etc .
If someone knows enough to rename their Wi-Fi network , then theoretically , they should also know how to set up even just a little bit of security .
Seriously , even though WEP , WPA , etc .
are not perfect , it 's a lot better than no security at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would expect that the most obvious Wi-Fi networks to hop onto are those named "linksys," "netgear," "d-link," etc.
If someone knows enough to rename their Wi-Fi network, then theoretically, they should also know how to set up even just a little bit of security.
Seriously, even though WEP, WPA, etc.
are not perfect, it's a lot better than no security at all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272506</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267115760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So what you're saying is that you can't maintain control over your own computers and your <i>neighbor</i> is the dumbass?</p><p>If you really really couldn't convince your wife's laptop not to connect to random aps you need to get it fixed, replace it, or use an OS without such serious bugs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So what you 're saying is that you ca n't maintain control over your own computers and your neighbor is the dumbass ? If you really really could n't convince your wife 's laptop not to connect to random aps you need to get it fixed , replace it , or use an OS without such serious bugs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what you're saying is that you can't maintain control over your own computers and your neighbor is the dumbass?If you really really couldn't convince your wife's laptop not to connect to random aps you need to get it fixed, replace it, or use an OS without such serious bugs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273260</id>
	<title>My favorite SSID</title>
	<author>blakelarson</author>
	<datestamp>1267119480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
LimitedConnectivity

Scares most away...</htmltext>
<tokenext>LimitedConnectivity Scares most away.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
LimitedConnectivity

Scares most away...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31274310</id>
	<title>Re:You don't really need to be a jerk</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267122900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I tried to post this comment on the original referred website, but the comments are closed.</p><p>My neighbor and I had a long-running dispute, and he did this to me.  I collected all the evidence, went to the police, and the police took him to the district court.  I was able to testify against him in front of him and the magistrate.  The magistrate essentially slapped his hand, but gave him a stern warning and lecture.  He had to hire an attorney and I'm sure it cost him several hundred dollars.</p><p>You would have to be as dumb as that guy to do something like this.  RWA2 is right on in his comments.  Its strictly sophomoric amusement, and it could easily escalate (my conflict nearly did several times.)</p><p>As other posters say, I'm still left with the same jerk next door a couple of years later.  You really have to be in for the long-haul, why go nuclear?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I tried to post this comment on the original referred website , but the comments are closed.My neighbor and I had a long-running dispute , and he did this to me .
I collected all the evidence , went to the police , and the police took him to the district court .
I was able to testify against him in front of him and the magistrate .
The magistrate essentially slapped his hand , but gave him a stern warning and lecture .
He had to hire an attorney and I 'm sure it cost him several hundred dollars.You would have to be as dumb as that guy to do something like this .
RWA2 is right on in his comments .
Its strictly sophomoric amusement , and it could easily escalate ( my conflict nearly did several times .
) As other posters say , I 'm still left with the same jerk next door a couple of years later .
You really have to be in for the long-haul , why go nuclear ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tried to post this comment on the original referred website, but the comments are closed.My neighbor and I had a long-running dispute, and he did this to me.
I collected all the evidence, went to the police, and the police took him to the district court.
I was able to testify against him in front of him and the magistrate.
The magistrate essentially slapped his hand, but gave him a stern warning and lecture.
He had to hire an attorney and I'm sure it cost him several hundred dollars.You would have to be as dumb as that guy to do something like this.
RWA2 is right on in his comments.
Its strictly sophomoric amusement, and it could easily escalate (my conflict nearly did several times.
)As other posters say, I'm still left with the same jerk next door a couple of years later.
You really have to be in for the long-haul, why go nuclear?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272738</id>
	<title>the goatsenet</title>
	<author>vekrander</author>
	<datestamp>1267116960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I'm feeling like a real jerk, I'll name my SSID to goatsenet and forward google.com to goatse, msn to lemonparty and so on.  If enough people do this, in the future, simply naming your network goatsenet will be deterrent enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I 'm feeling like a real jerk , I 'll name my SSID to goatsenet and forward google.com to goatse , msn to lemonparty and so on .
If enough people do this , in the future , simply naming your network goatsenet will be deterrent enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I'm feeling like a real jerk, I'll name my SSID to goatsenet and forward google.com to goatse, msn to lemonparty and so on.
If enough people do this, in the future, simply naming your network goatsenet will be deterrent enough.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273092</id>
	<title>Illegal names?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267118640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about the situation where people create a Wi-Fi network name which is offensive or racially abusive?  Do they run the risk of falling foul of the law/if I spot one, is there anyway to report them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about the situation where people create a Wi-Fi network name which is offensive or racially abusive ?
Do they run the risk of falling foul of the law/if I spot one , is there anyway to report them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about the situation where people create a Wi-Fi network name which is offensive or racially abusive?
Do they run the risk of falling foul of the law/if I spot one, is there anyway to report them?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272934</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1267117980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They were <em>both</em> morons.  The neighbor just lacked knowledge, while the poster lacked knowledge, research skills (I'm sure the answer is in knowledge base), and apparently is a sociopath.</p><p>I even if solving the problem at the neighbor's router was the best solution, wouldn't it have been more neighborly to just ask him to set the SSID to hidden, and maybe tell him how to secure his router?  What's with the BOFH abuse and then <em>charging</em> his neighbor for the privilege.  They had a mutual interest in tweaking the router, so they should have been able to come to an agreement which didn't involve money changing hands: turning off SSID makes the router less useful to its owner.</p><p>Your neighbors are your neighbors.  You're supposed to talk to them, loan and borrow tools and knowledge (within reason.  obviously you wouldn't do a free surgical consult).  Setting a password is a "do it while chatting over coffee" activity.  You wouldn't bill your neighbor for helping nail down plywood shutters before a hurricane and you shouldn't bill you neighbor for helping him type 8-14 letters in a text box and clicking enter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They were both morons .
The neighbor just lacked knowledge , while the poster lacked knowledge , research skills ( I 'm sure the answer is in knowledge base ) , and apparently is a sociopath.I even if solving the problem at the neighbor 's router was the best solution , would n't it have been more neighborly to just ask him to set the SSID to hidden , and maybe tell him how to secure his router ?
What 's with the BOFH abuse and then charging his neighbor for the privilege .
They had a mutual interest in tweaking the router , so they should have been able to come to an agreement which did n't involve money changing hands : turning off SSID makes the router less useful to its owner.Your neighbors are your neighbors .
You 're supposed to talk to them , loan and borrow tools and knowledge ( within reason .
obviously you would n't do a free surgical consult ) .
Setting a password is a " do it while chatting over coffee " activity .
You would n't bill your neighbor for helping nail down plywood shutters before a hurricane and you should n't bill you neighbor for helping him type 8-14 letters in a text box and clicking enter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They were both morons.
The neighbor just lacked knowledge, while the poster lacked knowledge, research skills (I'm sure the answer is in knowledge base), and apparently is a sociopath.I even if solving the problem at the neighbor's router was the best solution, wouldn't it have been more neighborly to just ask him to set the SSID to hidden, and maybe tell him how to secure his router?
What's with the BOFH abuse and then charging his neighbor for the privilege.
They had a mutual interest in tweaking the router, so they should have been able to come to an agreement which didn't involve money changing hands: turning off SSID makes the router less useful to its owner.Your neighbors are your neighbors.
You're supposed to talk to them, loan and borrow tools and knowledge (within reason.
obviously you wouldn't do a free surgical consult).
Setting a password is a "do it while chatting over coffee" activity.
You wouldn't bill your neighbor for helping nail down plywood shutters before a hurricane and you shouldn't bill you neighbor for helping him type 8-14 letters in a text box and clicking enter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31283234</id>
	<title>Re:Or.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267184820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You should redirect the video-streams so that they whatever they try to watch they end up with Two Girls, One Cup (just google it if you don't know).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You should redirect the video-streams so that they whatever they try to watch they end up with Two Girls , One Cup ( just google it if you do n't know ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should redirect the video-streams so that they whatever they try to watch they end up with Two Girls, One Cup (just google it if you don't know).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31281604</id>
	<title>better yet</title>
	<author>formfeed</author>
	<datestamp>1267120380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> Open your wifi a couple days before you go on vacation and set squid to redirect all the "bad" sites to some scary warning page you made up. Then immediately disconnect. </p><p>
The warning page will show your neighbour's lan address, but  <i>your</i> public IP and <i>your</i> street address, together with some severe warnings.
</p><p> Two days later, have some friends drag you out of the house into a dark car. For effect they can also carry out an old computer monitor. When you return two weeks later, look angrily  at your neighbor. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Open your wifi a couple days before you go on vacation and set squid to redirect all the " bad " sites to some scary warning page you made up .
Then immediately disconnect .
The warning page will show your neighbour 's lan address , but your public IP and your street address , together with some severe warnings .
Two days later , have some friends drag you out of the house into a dark car .
For effect they can also carry out an old computer monitor .
When you return two weeks later , look angrily at your neighbor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Open your wifi a couple days before you go on vacation and set squid to redirect all the "bad" sites to some scary warning page you made up.
Then immediately disconnect.
The warning page will show your neighbour's lan address, but  your public IP and your street address, together with some severe warnings.
Two days later, have some friends drag you out of the house into a dark car.
For effect they can also carry out an old computer monitor.
When you return two weeks later, look angrily  at your neighbor. </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273296</id>
	<title>Re:Funny Names I have Used</title>
	<author>imakemusic</author>
	<datestamp>1267119540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My favourites are "Error" or "Corrupted Node: Do Not Use".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My favourites are " Error " or " Corrupted Node : Do Not Use " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My favourites are "Error" or "Corrupted Node: Do Not Use".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273728</id>
	<title>Lots of wireless. Less friendly to a nomad. Lame.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267121040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(...sorry, CmdrTaco...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( ...sorry , CmdrTaco... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(...sorry, CmdrTaco...)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272042</id>
	<title>Nice Guys Finish Last</title>
	<author>jimbolauski</author>
	<datestamp>1267113060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If your neighbors are assholes holding hands and singing ain't going to happen, it's best just to grow a pair and tell them if you don't have the balls create a login page to your hotspot that plays the recording of you neighbors having sex, or pictures of dog shit from your neighbors dog, just make sure your shit is in-order before you do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If your neighbors are assholes holding hands and singing ai n't going to happen , it 's best just to grow a pair and tell them if you do n't have the balls create a login page to your hotspot that plays the recording of you neighbors having sex , or pictures of dog shit from your neighbors dog , just make sure your shit is in-order before you do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If your neighbors are assholes holding hands and singing ain't going to happen, it's best just to grow a pair and tell them if you don't have the balls create a login page to your hotspot that plays the recording of you neighbors having sex, or pictures of dog shit from your neighbors dog, just make sure your shit is in-order before you do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272878</id>
	<title>I came up with the best name</title>
	<author>wbav</author>
	<datestamp>1267117680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>When people connect to my wireless network with a Microsoft machine, they see:<p>

"Windows is now connecting to the 'Psychic Friends' network."</p><p>

Makes me smile, every time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When people connect to my wireless network with a Microsoft machine , they see : " Windows is now connecting to the 'Psychic Friends ' network .
" Makes me smile , every time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When people connect to my wireless network with a Microsoft machine, they see:

"Windows is now connecting to the 'Psychic Friends' network.
"

Makes me smile, every time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272818</id>
	<title>Re:Or.</title>
	<author>clf8</author>
	<datestamp>1267117440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I run my Wifi as a Closed network.  It doesn't even show up in people's lists, you have to know the name.  Why even advertise a door to begin with?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I run my Wifi as a Closed network .
It does n't even show up in people 's lists , you have to know the name .
Why even advertise a door to begin with ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I run my Wifi as a Closed network.
It doesn't even show up in people's lists, you have to know the name.
Why even advertise a door to begin with?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272368</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>sandawgscorch</author>
	<datestamp>1267115160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>hahahaha! haven't laughed so hard in a looong time!

great story!lol</htmltext>
<tokenext>hahahaha !
have n't laughed so hard in a looong time !
great story ! lol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hahahaha!
haven't laughed so hard in a looong time!
great story!lol</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273576</id>
	<title>Re: Or.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267120560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lame.</p><p>And misses the point, but no excuse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lame.And misses the point , but no excuse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lame.And misses the point, but no excuse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272626</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267116360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I did everything I could to make XP either forget or disregard his network, but it would not.  Something in XP (even after re-installation), simply insisted on connecting to his SSID over my secure one.</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>I've had other neighbors who were complete morons too.</p></div><p>Okay.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did everything I could to make XP either forget or disregard his network , but it would not .
Something in XP ( even after re-installation ) , simply insisted on connecting to his SSID over my secure one.I 've had other neighbors who were complete morons too.Okay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I did everything I could to make XP either forget or disregard his network, but it would not.
Something in XP (even after re-installation), simply insisted on connecting to his SSID over my secure one.I've had other neighbors who were complete morons too.Okay.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31283468</id>
	<title>Re:Funny Names I have Used</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267188360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My current name is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>//UNKNOWN\\ , but I don't leave it open. Got the password taped to the router though since it's such a pain to explain a 15 symbols long password, I just send them to my computer room.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My current name is //UNKNOWN \ \ , but I do n't leave it open .
Got the password taped to the router though since it 's such a pain to explain a 15 symbols long password , I just send them to my computer room .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My current name is //UNKNOWN\\ , but I don't leave it open.
Got the password taped to the router though since it's such a pain to explain a 15 symbols long password, I just send them to my computer room.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272808</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267117440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>youre a real asshole. what do you do that you have so much time to harass and your neighbor? have you thought about taking up a constructive hobby?would it have been so hard to let him know what was going on and help him secure it, passing on your knowledge/being halfway decent instead of wasting his time and money?  i feel sorry for your wife, she must have really low self esteem to put up with someone as petty as you.

this whole story is probably made up anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>youre a real asshole .
what do you do that you have so much time to harass and your neighbor ?
have you thought about taking up a constructive hobby ? would it have been so hard to let him know what was going on and help him secure it , passing on your knowledge/being halfway decent instead of wasting his time and money ?
i feel sorry for your wife , she must have really low self esteem to put up with someone as petty as you .
this whole story is probably made up anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>youre a real asshole.
what do you do that you have so much time to harass and your neighbor?
have you thought about taking up a constructive hobby?would it have been so hard to let him know what was going on and help him secure it, passing on your knowledge/being halfway decent instead of wasting his time and money?
i feel sorry for your wife, she must have really low self esteem to put up with someone as petty as you.
this whole story is probably made up anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272844</id>
	<title>there is one in my area</title>
	<author>MickyTheIdiot</author>
	<datestamp>1267117560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One where I live is called "NotYourNetwork".  Not quite as good as these, but it always amused me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One where I live is called " NotYourNetwork " .
Not quite as good as these , but it always amused me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One where I live is called "NotYourNetwork".
Not quite as good as these, but it always amused me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272610</id>
	<title>Re:You don't really need to be a jerk</title>
	<author>godrik</author>
	<datestamp>1267116300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know you are already modded Interesting. but thank you for the info,</p><p>For the record, the ESSID of my network is ParasiteNet and is always open (in the honor of C. Doctorow). My neighboor love it. They just receive DHCPNAKs when they start consuming too much bandwidth...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know you are already modded Interesting .
but thank you for the info,For the record , the ESSID of my network is ParasiteNet and is always open ( in the honor of C. Doctorow ) . My neighboor love it .
They just receive DHCPNAKs when they start consuming too much bandwidth.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know you are already modded Interesting.
but thank you for the info,For the record, the ESSID of my network is ParasiteNet and is always open (in the honor of C. Doctorow). My neighboor love it.
They just receive DHCPNAKs when they start consuming too much bandwidth...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273282</id>
	<title>I do this already</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1267119540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The SSID of my unsecured 'guest' hotspot (for friends' cell phone and such) has be called 'keystroke\_logger\_enabled" for years.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The SSID of my unsecured 'guest ' hotspot ( for friends ' cell phone and such ) has be called 'keystroke \ _logger \ _enabled " for years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The SSID of my unsecured 'guest' hotspot (for friends' cell phone and such) has be called 'keystroke\_logger\_enabled" for years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272284</id>
	<title>better yet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267114680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>ifYouPasswordProtectYourNetworkIllStopUsingYourInternet</htmltext>
<tokenext>ifYouPasswordProtectYourNetworkIllStopUsingYourInternet</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ifYouPasswordProtectYourNetworkIllStopUsingYourInternet</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272504</id>
	<title>Re:Or.</title>
	<author>digitalhermit</author>
	<datestamp>1267115760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My wifi is normally secured, but I have some neighbors that are always trying to login. I see their attempts in the router logs and I open the router up every so often just to have fun. I set the broadcast name to "passw0rd" and changed to that password. Sure enough, they immediately log in with that key. I've set the router to deny all traffic except through my squid proxy and all pages redirect to the proxy welcome page until then.  I don't care for their personal content, but it's interesting seeing the URLs that show up in the proxy. Many of them set cookies or use other auth so I can't see their content (at least not without changing some settings) but a good percentage use URL encoding so I can pull up their personal sites.  The neighbors bounce a lot between facebook, gmail and some news sites. Oh and porn. The bastards watch a lot of porn. I'm probably going to start redirecting those sites to the GOP homepage or a rickroll at some point You can do this by subscribing squid to one of the blocklist sites. Nothing like a dated meme to piss off the neighbors.</p><p>Setup of the squid proxy took a few hours.. hardest part was the DNS redirect until they connect to the proxy, but there's tons of instructions now for doing it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My wifi is normally secured , but I have some neighbors that are always trying to login .
I see their attempts in the router logs and I open the router up every so often just to have fun .
I set the broadcast name to " passw0rd " and changed to that password .
Sure enough , they immediately log in with that key .
I 've set the router to deny all traffic except through my squid proxy and all pages redirect to the proxy welcome page until then .
I do n't care for their personal content , but it 's interesting seeing the URLs that show up in the proxy .
Many of them set cookies or use other auth so I ca n't see their content ( at least not without changing some settings ) but a good percentage use URL encoding so I can pull up their personal sites .
The neighbors bounce a lot between facebook , gmail and some news sites .
Oh and porn .
The bastards watch a lot of porn .
I 'm probably going to start redirecting those sites to the GOP homepage or a rickroll at some point You can do this by subscribing squid to one of the blocklist sites .
Nothing like a dated meme to piss off the neighbors.Setup of the squid proxy took a few hours.. hardest part was the DNS redirect until they connect to the proxy , but there 's tons of instructions now for doing it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My wifi is normally secured, but I have some neighbors that are always trying to login.
I see their attempts in the router logs and I open the router up every so often just to have fun.
I set the broadcast name to "passw0rd" and changed to that password.
Sure enough, they immediately log in with that key.
I've set the router to deny all traffic except through my squid proxy and all pages redirect to the proxy welcome page until then.
I don't care for their personal content, but it's interesting seeing the URLs that show up in the proxy.
Many of them set cookies or use other auth so I can't see their content (at least not without changing some settings) but a good percentage use URL encoding so I can pull up their personal sites.
The neighbors bounce a lot between facebook, gmail and some news sites.
Oh and porn.
The bastards watch a lot of porn.
I'm probably going to start redirecting those sites to the GOP homepage or a rickroll at some point You can do this by subscribing squid to one of the blocklist sites.
Nothing like a dated meme to piss off the neighbors.Setup of the squid proxy took a few hours.. hardest part was the DNS redirect until they connect to the proxy, but there's tons of instructions now for doing it...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</id>
	<title>Other issues</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267113300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My problems with my neighbors were not them stealing my WiFi, but in how they set up their routers...  One specifically had a wide open router that for some damned reason my Wife's XP notebook would exclusively connect to, even when the signal was weaker than available preferred networks.  I did everything I could to make XP either forget or disregard his network, but it would not.  Something in XP (even after re-installation), simply insisted on connecting to his SSID over my secure one.  This really pissed me off as the wife would establish VPNs to work, then try to print something to our printer only to find out she was not on our network, and would have to redo significant work, or the connection would just drop because his signal was weak.</p><p>Well, needless to say, he was a computer moron.  Took the router out of the box, plugged it in, and went.  It took about 10 seconds to log onto his device and turn the antenna off, then set a complex admin password.  Every couple of days it would be back, so I'd break it again.  After a few weeks, i noticed it was a new model, so I repeated the same process on it after XP continued to insist on connecting to it.  (and just HER damned notebook, not any of my other 3 XP machines).  I talked to him one day while I was mowing the lawn and he complained about the damned thing, and several calls to support, but they couldn't fix it, and apparently at no time ever suggested him to secure it either.</p><p>This went on for a while.  He apparently rarely used his wireless (he was rarely home), and actually, i think it wasn't even his notebook, but a friend's he had the wireless for, so when I'd turn off his device, it would be a while till it came on.  One Saturday though I turned it off, and it came back on quick.  So, I did it again, several times in that day.  He went out for a while after about the 4th time, and came back an hour later with a blue BestBuy bag with what looked like another new router.  This was going to be fun...</p><p>By the end of Sunday afternoon, I had that poor bastard back to the store not less than 5 times, each time with a different router.  I was practically camped by the family room window waiting to see him come and go, and had his unit shut down within minutes each time he got a new one up and running.  Eventually, the wife made me go out and talk to him (honestly, even i was getting bored of the routine, and also noted this wasn't seeming to be coming to an end, he wasn't getting the hints), so I wen out and "inquired" as to the repeated trips to BestBuy.  He told me his side of the story...</p><p>I said, "Oh, you're probably getting interference from someone else's system in the neighborhood, didn't support tell you that?  You should secure your device"  Then i offered he pay me $50 to do it for him (BestBuy was charging $149 at that time, and apparently got quite insistent that if he returned anohter device they'd not give him his money back unless they did an onsite install of the next one).  he agreed, I secured it, set his SSID to hidden, and didn't have issues again (with him).</p><p>I've had other neighbors who were complete morons too.   One apparently went around telling everyone else to hard set their access points to channel 2, since it was statistically the clearest channel.  (I have NO idea where he got that one).  It didn't phase me, but every one of them had issues...  This only caused me issues because all their damned devices were only seeing my router, with all the other interference, and although it was secure, my log files occasionally filled up with people trying and failing to log on.  Another convinced all the people in an apartment complex to pay him for Internet access, and set himself up as a mini ISP.  Well, besides it being a huge hassle, as 15 people trying to hit his AP at once caused issues for sure, apparently one of them called support and spilled the beans.  My, not being a dumb ass, maintained my own connection on a secure router, however, i had a HELL of a time proving to TWC that I was not the one sharing my conn</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My problems with my neighbors were not them stealing my WiFi , but in how they set up their routers... One specifically had a wide open router that for some damned reason my Wife 's XP notebook would exclusively connect to , even when the signal was weaker than available preferred networks .
I did everything I could to make XP either forget or disregard his network , but it would not .
Something in XP ( even after re-installation ) , simply insisted on connecting to his SSID over my secure one .
This really pissed me off as the wife would establish VPNs to work , then try to print something to our printer only to find out she was not on our network , and would have to redo significant work , or the connection would just drop because his signal was weak.Well , needless to say , he was a computer moron .
Took the router out of the box , plugged it in , and went .
It took about 10 seconds to log onto his device and turn the antenna off , then set a complex admin password .
Every couple of days it would be back , so I 'd break it again .
After a few weeks , i noticed it was a new model , so I repeated the same process on it after XP continued to insist on connecting to it .
( and just HER damned notebook , not any of my other 3 XP machines ) .
I talked to him one day while I was mowing the lawn and he complained about the damned thing , and several calls to support , but they could n't fix it , and apparently at no time ever suggested him to secure it either.This went on for a while .
He apparently rarely used his wireless ( he was rarely home ) , and actually , i think it was n't even his notebook , but a friend 's he had the wireless for , so when I 'd turn off his device , it would be a while till it came on .
One Saturday though I turned it off , and it came back on quick .
So , I did it again , several times in that day .
He went out for a while after about the 4th time , and came back an hour later with a blue BestBuy bag with what looked like another new router .
This was going to be fun...By the end of Sunday afternoon , I had that poor bastard back to the store not less than 5 times , each time with a different router .
I was practically camped by the family room window waiting to see him come and go , and had his unit shut down within minutes each time he got a new one up and running .
Eventually , the wife made me go out and talk to him ( honestly , even i was getting bored of the routine , and also noted this was n't seeming to be coming to an end , he was n't getting the hints ) , so I wen out and " inquired " as to the repeated trips to BestBuy .
He told me his side of the story...I said , " Oh , you 're probably getting interference from someone else 's system in the neighborhood , did n't support tell you that ?
You should secure your device " Then i offered he pay me $ 50 to do it for him ( BestBuy was charging $ 149 at that time , and apparently got quite insistent that if he returned anohter device they 'd not give him his money back unless they did an onsite install of the next one ) .
he agreed , I secured it , set his SSID to hidden , and did n't have issues again ( with him ) .I 've had other neighbors who were complete morons too .
One apparently went around telling everyone else to hard set their access points to channel 2 , since it was statistically the clearest channel .
( I have NO idea where he got that one ) .
It did n't phase me , but every one of them had issues... This only caused me issues because all their damned devices were only seeing my router , with all the other interference , and although it was secure , my log files occasionally filled up with people trying and failing to log on .
Another convinced all the people in an apartment complex to pay him for Internet access , and set himself up as a mini ISP .
Well , besides it being a huge hassle , as 15 people trying to hit his AP at once caused issues for sure , apparently one of them called support and spilled the beans .
My , not being a dumb ass , maintained my own connection on a secure router , however , i had a HELL of a time proving to TWC that I was not the one sharing my conn</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My problems with my neighbors were not them stealing my WiFi, but in how they set up their routers...  One specifically had a wide open router that for some damned reason my Wife's XP notebook would exclusively connect to, even when the signal was weaker than available preferred networks.
I did everything I could to make XP either forget or disregard his network, but it would not.
Something in XP (even after re-installation), simply insisted on connecting to his SSID over my secure one.
This really pissed me off as the wife would establish VPNs to work, then try to print something to our printer only to find out she was not on our network, and would have to redo significant work, or the connection would just drop because his signal was weak.Well, needless to say, he was a computer moron.
Took the router out of the box, plugged it in, and went.
It took about 10 seconds to log onto his device and turn the antenna off, then set a complex admin password.
Every couple of days it would be back, so I'd break it again.
After a few weeks, i noticed it was a new model, so I repeated the same process on it after XP continued to insist on connecting to it.
(and just HER damned notebook, not any of my other 3 XP machines).
I talked to him one day while I was mowing the lawn and he complained about the damned thing, and several calls to support, but they couldn't fix it, and apparently at no time ever suggested him to secure it either.This went on for a while.
He apparently rarely used his wireless (he was rarely home), and actually, i think it wasn't even his notebook, but a friend's he had the wireless for, so when I'd turn off his device, it would be a while till it came on.
One Saturday though I turned it off, and it came back on quick.
So, I did it again, several times in that day.
He went out for a while after about the 4th time, and came back an hour later with a blue BestBuy bag with what looked like another new router.
This was going to be fun...By the end of Sunday afternoon, I had that poor bastard back to the store not less than 5 times, each time with a different router.
I was practically camped by the family room window waiting to see him come and go, and had his unit shut down within minutes each time he got a new one up and running.
Eventually, the wife made me go out and talk to him (honestly, even i was getting bored of the routine, and also noted this wasn't seeming to be coming to an end, he wasn't getting the hints), so I wen out and "inquired" as to the repeated trips to BestBuy.
He told me his side of the story...I said, "Oh, you're probably getting interference from someone else's system in the neighborhood, didn't support tell you that?
You should secure your device"  Then i offered he pay me $50 to do it for him (BestBuy was charging $149 at that time, and apparently got quite insistent that if he returned anohter device they'd not give him his money back unless they did an onsite install of the next one).
he agreed, I secured it, set his SSID to hidden, and didn't have issues again (with him).I've had other neighbors who were complete morons too.
One apparently went around telling everyone else to hard set their access points to channel 2, since it was statistically the clearest channel.
(I have NO idea where he got that one).
It didn't phase me, but every one of them had issues...  This only caused me issues because all their damned devices were only seeing my router, with all the other interference, and although it was secure, my log files occasionally filled up with people trying and failing to log on.
Another convinced all the people in an apartment complex to pay him for Internet access, and set himself up as a mini ISP.
Well, besides it being a huge hassle, as 15 people trying to hit his AP at once caused issues for sure, apparently one of them called support and spilled the beans.
My, not being a dumb ass, maintained my own connection on a secure router, however, i had a HELL of a time proving to TWC that I was not the one sharing my conn</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272600</id>
	<title>Oblig. bash.org quote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267116240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(Mootar) morons.<br>(Mootar) these people who live in my apartment complex are connected to my wireless<br>(Mootar) they must think they're super-cool hackers by breaking into my completely unsecure network<br>(Mootar) unfortunately, the connection works both ways<br>(Mootar) long story short, they now have loads of horse porn on their computer</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( Mootar ) morons .
( Mootar ) these people who live in my apartment complex are connected to my wireless ( Mootar ) they must think they 're super-cool hackers by breaking into my completely unsecure network ( Mootar ) unfortunately , the connection works both ways ( Mootar ) long story short , they now have loads of horse porn on their computer</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(Mootar) morons.
(Mootar) these people who live in my apartment complex are connected to my wireless(Mootar) they must think they're super-cool hackers by breaking into my completely unsecure network(Mootar) unfortunately, the connection works both ways(Mootar) long story short, they now have loads of horse porn on their computer</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31274192</id>
	<title>Re:Or.</title>
	<author>Taibhsear</author>
	<datestamp>1267122480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First thing I thought. Gods forbid someone has to type in a password... (honestly if you can't figure out that you should put a password on both your wifi connection and your router you probably shouldn't be playing with those things)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First thing I thought .
Gods forbid someone has to type in a password... ( honestly if you ca n't figure out that you should put a password on both your wifi connection and your router you probably should n't be playing with those things )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First thing I thought.
Gods forbid someone has to type in a password... (honestly if you can't figure out that you should put a password on both your wifi connection and your router you probably shouldn't be playing with those things)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272264</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267114560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Well, needless to say, he was a computer moron.</i></p><p>Well, you're the moron who can't get windows XP to connect to your own wireless network.</p><p>Pot, kettle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , needless to say , he was a computer moron.Well , you 're the moron who ca n't get windows XP to connect to your own wireless network.Pot , kettle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, needless to say, he was a computer moron.Well, you're the moron who can't get windows XP to connect to your own wireless network.Pot, kettle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273002</id>
	<title>Re:Nice Guys Finish Last</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1267118220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I caught my neighbors using my internet, I'd probably copy Netzero onto a floppy, hand it to them, and say "Yes this; it's free.  My Wifi is not."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I caught my neighbors using my internet , I 'd probably copy Netzero onto a floppy , hand it to them , and say " Yes this ; it 's free .
My Wifi is not .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I caught my neighbors using my internet, I'd probably copy Netzero onto a floppy, hand it to them, and say "Yes this; it's free.
My Wifi is not.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272694</id>
	<title>Re:You don't really need to be a jerk</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267116780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Verizon actually shutsdown internet and cable service when running on the fibre adapteers own battery.. and just keeps the phone line going, you need to add a UPS to that box too and it will keep runing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Verizon actually shutsdown internet and cable service when running on the fibre adapteers own battery.. and just keeps the phone line going , you need to add a UPS to that box too and it will keep runing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Verizon actually shutsdown internet and cable service when running on the fibre adapteers own battery.. and just keeps the phone line going, you need to add a UPS to that box too and it will keep runing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273866</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267121400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're the dumb-ass who can't configure XP to a particular router. Don't blame your neighbor for your idiocy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're the dumb-ass who ca n't configure XP to a particular router .
Do n't blame your neighbor for your idiocy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're the dumb-ass who can't configure XP to a particular router.
Don't blame your neighbor for your idiocy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273084</id>
	<title>Re:Or.</title>
	<author>Strange Ranger</author>
	<datestamp>1267118580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Secure your <i>computers</i>.  Share your wifi.<br> <br>Given the number of visitors and neighbors who have iPhones, blackberries, laptops, etc., it's the friendly thing to do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Secure your computers .
Share your wifi .
Given the number of visitors and neighbors who have iPhones , blackberries , laptops , etc. , it 's the friendly thing to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Secure your computers.
Share your wifi.
Given the number of visitors and neighbors who have iPhones, blackberries, laptops, etc., it's the friendly thing to do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272362</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267115160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I mean, how hard would it really be if every router shipped with a unique SSID and a default random password?  And that creating a "guest" open network was limited only to the most expensive and corporate models that had multiple SSID and radio support (secure or nothing configuration)?  If everyone's routers were secure, then the only people "stealing" broadband would be people you LET steal it...</p></div><p>2Wire does this with their DSL Modem+Routers..... the problem is the default security they have it set to is.... WEP.... sigh.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , how hard would it really be if every router shipped with a unique SSID and a default random password ?
And that creating a " guest " open network was limited only to the most expensive and corporate models that had multiple SSID and radio support ( secure or nothing configuration ) ?
If everyone 's routers were secure , then the only people " stealing " broadband would be people you LET steal it...2Wire does this with their DSL Modem + Routers..... the problem is the default security they have it set to is.... WEP.... sigh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, how hard would it really be if every router shipped with a unique SSID and a default random password?
And that creating a "guest" open network was limited only to the most expensive and corporate models that had multiple SSID and radio support (secure or nothing configuration)?
If everyone's routers were secure, then the only people "stealing" broadband would be people you LET steal it...2Wire does this with their DSL Modem+Routers..... the problem is the default security they have it set to is.... WEP.... sigh.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272040</id>
	<title>Freifunk</title>
	<author>Elektroschock</author>
	<datestamp>1267113060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sharing a Wi-FI connection should be common pratice. This is what Freifunk is about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sharing a Wi-FI connection should be common pratice .
This is what Freifunk is about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sharing a Wi-FI connection should be common pratice.
This is what Freifunk is about.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273370</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>imakemusic</author>
	<datestamp>1267119780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you had access to the router why didn't you just but a ban on your wife's laptop to prevent it from being able to join?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you had access to the router why did n't you just but a ban on your wife 's laptop to prevent it from being able to join ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you had access to the router why didn't you just but a ban on your wife's laptop to prevent it from being able to join?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31274984</id>
	<title>Re:Or.</title>
	<author>Orange Crush</author>
	<datestamp>1267125060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I used to leave my Wi-Fi open and broadcasting for precisely that reason.  Then my neighbors, who frequently have screaming fights in their front yard, called a noise complaint on ME for watching a movie with the "volume too loud" or something.</p><p>No more free internet for those jerks.  I've secured mine with an easy-to-remember and easy-to-give-to-guests key that still incorporates upper and lower case letters as well as numbers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to leave my Wi-Fi open and broadcasting for precisely that reason .
Then my neighbors , who frequently have screaming fights in their front yard , called a noise complaint on ME for watching a movie with the " volume too loud " or something.No more free internet for those jerks .
I 've secured mine with an easy-to-remember and easy-to-give-to-guests key that still incorporates upper and lower case letters as well as numbers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to leave my Wi-Fi open and broadcasting for precisely that reason.
Then my neighbors, who frequently have screaming fights in their front yard, called a noise complaint on ME for watching a movie with the "volume too loud" or something.No more free internet for those jerks.
I've secured mine with an easy-to-remember and easy-to-give-to-guests key that still incorporates upper and lower case letters as well as numbers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273196</id>
	<title>SSIDs in my building...</title>
	<author>moxley</author>
	<datestamp>1267119240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SSIDs in my building:</p><p>"Grizzlymuff"<br>"linksys"<br>"hey 2b I wanna jizz on yr face"<br>"NDBinternet"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....and yes, the girl in 2b is incredibly hot, I'm sure that's why someone chose to send the entire building (and surrounding bldg's)  that incredibly classy message.</p><p>I think this is really funny - because what could anybody do about it?</p><p>I wonder if there is anything someone could put in their SSID that would actually cause people to call the police?  I mean, obvious things like endorsing blowing up federal bldgs or child abuse might, but then how would they find it? - I mean, obviously it could be done, but would they really do it, just over an SSID - and would they actually try to charge someone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SSIDs in my building : " Grizzlymuff " " linksys " " hey 2b I wan na jizz on yr face " " NDBinternet " ....and yes , the girl in 2b is incredibly hot , I 'm sure that 's why someone chose to send the entire building ( and surrounding bldg 's ) that incredibly classy message.I think this is really funny - because what could anybody do about it ? I wonder if there is anything someone could put in their SSID that would actually cause people to call the police ?
I mean , obvious things like endorsing blowing up federal bldgs or child abuse might , but then how would they find it ?
- I mean , obviously it could be done , but would they really do it , just over an SSID - and would they actually try to charge someone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SSIDs in my building:"Grizzlymuff""linksys""hey 2b I wanna jizz on yr face""NDBinternet" ....and yes, the girl in 2b is incredibly hot, I'm sure that's why someone chose to send the entire building (and surrounding bldg's)  that incredibly classy message.I think this is really funny - because what could anybody do about it?I wonder if there is anything someone could put in their SSID that would actually cause people to call the police?
I mean, obvious things like endorsing blowing up federal bldgs or child abuse might, but then how would they find it?
- I mean, obviously it could be done, but would they really do it, just over an SSID - and would they actually try to charge someone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31290280</id>
	<title>Re:Or.</title>
	<author>virtualXTC</author>
	<datestamp>1267177260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, but you need to first install linux on the router, there are many flavors such as <a href="http://www.polarcloud.com/tomato" title="polarcloud.com" rel="nofollow">Tomato</a> [polarcloud.com], <a href="http://openwrt.org/" title="openwrt.org" rel="nofollow">OpenWrt</a> [openwrt.org], <a href="http://x-wrt.org/" title="x-wrt.org" rel="nofollow">x-wrt</a> [x-wrt.org], and <a href="http://www.freewrt.org/trac/" title="freewrt.org" rel="nofollow">freewrt</a> [freewrt.org], but I think <a href="http://www.dd-wrt.com/" title="dd-wrt.com" rel="nofollow">DD-WRT</a> [dd-wrt.com] is probably the best place to start.
Then you need to <a href="http://www.ex-parrot.com/pete/upside-down-ternet.html" title="ex-parrot.com" rel="nofollow">split the network</a> [ex-parrot.com] as mentioned below.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but you need to first install linux on the router , there are many flavors such as Tomato [ polarcloud.com ] , OpenWrt [ openwrt.org ] , x-wrt [ x-wrt.org ] , and freewrt [ freewrt.org ] , but I think DD-WRT [ dd-wrt.com ] is probably the best place to start .
Then you need to split the network [ ex-parrot.com ] as mentioned below .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but you need to first install linux on the router, there are many flavors such as Tomato [polarcloud.com], OpenWrt [openwrt.org], x-wrt [x-wrt.org], and freewrt [freewrt.org], but I think DD-WRT [dd-wrt.com] is probably the best place to start.
Then you need to split the network [ex-parrot.com] as mentioned below.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273892</id>
	<title>Re:Other issues</title>
	<author>LanMan04</author>
	<datestamp>1267121460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So because you can't operate YOUR computer properly (XP connecting to this guy's router), you decide to fuck up his internet?</p><p>Asshole.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So because you ca n't operate YOUR computer properly ( XP connecting to this guy 's router ) , you decide to fuck up his internet ? Asshole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So because you can't operate YOUR computer properly (XP connecting to this guy's router), you decide to fuck up his internet?Asshole.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271888</id>
	<title>Re:Or.</title>
	<author>TheLink</author>
	<datestamp>1267112160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not as fun as this:</p><p><a href="http://www.ex-parrot.com/pete/upside-down-ternet.html" title="ex-parrot.com">http://www.ex-parrot.com/pete/upside-down-ternet.html</a> [ex-parrot.com]</p><p>You might even purposely not secure your wifi<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not as fun as this : http : //www.ex-parrot.com/pete/upside-down-ternet.html [ ex-parrot.com ] You might even purposely not secure your wifi ; ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not as fun as this:http://www.ex-parrot.com/pete/upside-down-ternet.html [ex-parrot.com]You might even purposely not secure your wifi ;).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271978</id>
	<title>In my vicinity...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267112820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...there's an AP named "banislam". I find it agreeable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...there 's an AP named " banislam " .
I find it agreeable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...there's an AP named "banislam".
I find it agreeable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271798</id>
	<title>You don't really need to be a jerk</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267111620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, some of them are a little bit funny.  This would make a good humor post.  But it's hard enough to stay on good terms with your neighbors as it is, so consider saying something nice.  Like in driving, it's often stupid and dangerous to fight *ssholes by acting like one yourself, thinking you're going to teach them a lesson.</p><p>I run an open AP named "nohup", since it's on a UPS and is often the only one still running when the power goes out.  (Unfortunately, Verizon FIOS's upstream UPS goes out after 5-10 minutes nowadays -- not the ONI in my house, which can putter along for a few hours, but something upstream of that)</p><p>Work with your neighbors to get a wifi mesh going:  <a href="http://www.olsr.org/" title="olsr.org">http://www.olsr.org/</a> [olsr.org]</p><p>If you still really want to dick with people, at least do something more technically interesting with transparent proxy hacks, such as <a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Upside-Down-TernetHowTo" title="ubuntu.com">https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Upside-Down-TernetHowTo</a> [ubuntu.com] or running it through a Swedish Chef filter or the ilk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , some of them are a little bit funny .
This would make a good humor post .
But it 's hard enough to stay on good terms with your neighbors as it is , so consider saying something nice .
Like in driving , it 's often stupid and dangerous to fight * ssholes by acting like one yourself , thinking you 're going to teach them a lesson.I run an open AP named " nohup " , since it 's on a UPS and is often the only one still running when the power goes out .
( Unfortunately , Verizon FIOS 's upstream UPS goes out after 5-10 minutes nowadays -- not the ONI in my house , which can putter along for a few hours , but something upstream of that ) Work with your neighbors to get a wifi mesh going : http : //www.olsr.org/ [ olsr.org ] If you still really want to dick with people , at least do something more technically interesting with transparent proxy hacks , such as https : //help.ubuntu.com/community/Upside-Down-TernetHowTo [ ubuntu.com ] or running it through a Swedish Chef filter or the ilk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, some of them are a little bit funny.
This would make a good humor post.
But it's hard enough to stay on good terms with your neighbors as it is, so consider saying something nice.
Like in driving, it's often stupid and dangerous to fight *ssholes by acting like one yourself, thinking you're going to teach them a lesson.I run an open AP named "nohup", since it's on a UPS and is often the only one still running when the power goes out.
(Unfortunately, Verizon FIOS's upstream UPS goes out after 5-10 minutes nowadays -- not the ONI in my house, which can putter along for a few hours, but something upstream of that)Work with your neighbors to get a wifi mesh going:  http://www.olsr.org/ [olsr.org]If you still really want to dick with people, at least do something more technically interesting with transparent proxy hacks, such as https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Upside-Down-TernetHowTo [ubuntu.com] or running it through a Swedish Chef filter or the ilk.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272356</id>
	<title>Convo with SSID</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267115100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is funny only because I once had a conversation with someone using SSID. It was back and forth quips everyday about how my house is better than theirs and  so on and so forth.. I realized how incredibly interesting it was to have a "conversation" with SSIDs and how incredibly geeky it was..</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is funny only because I once had a conversation with someone using SSID .
It was back and forth quips everyday about how my house is better than theirs and so on and so forth.. I realized how incredibly interesting it was to have a " conversation " with SSIDs and how incredibly geeky it was. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is funny only because I once had a conversation with someone using SSID.
It was back and forth quips everyday about how my house is better than theirs and  so on and so forth.. I realized how incredibly interesting it was to have a "conversation" with SSIDs and how incredibly geeky it was..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271968</id>
	<title>Stupid idea.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1267112760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just install some snooper and logger and let the neighbour in, steal the credentials to his bank account, brokerage account, clean them out, and bankrupt him and force his home into foreclosure and buy it yourself using his own money that you stole. Now no pesky neighbour riding free on your WiFi. Instead you come up with some lame network names? Dumb.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just install some snooper and logger and let the neighbour in , steal the credentials to his bank account , brokerage account , clean them out , and bankrupt him and force his home into foreclosure and buy it yourself using his own money that you stole .
Now no pesky neighbour riding free on your WiFi .
Instead you come up with some lame network names ?
Dumb .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just install some snooper and logger and let the neighbour in, steal the credentials to his bank account, brokerage account, clean them out, and bankrupt him and force his home into foreclosure and buy it yourself using his own money that you stole.
Now no pesky neighbour riding free on your WiFi.
Instead you come up with some lame network names?
Dumb.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31315332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31283234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31274626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31281110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31283468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31278672
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31276000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31274192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272276
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31274310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31274944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31290280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31281604
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31280048
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273892
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31274394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272694
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272570
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31275684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31274984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31280414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_25_1348241_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272362
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1348241.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271968
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1348241.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272278
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1348241.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272928
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272610
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31274310
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31274944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272042
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31281110
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1348241.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272372
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1348241.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272048
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31283468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273006
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1348241.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272808
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272370
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273370
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272506
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273630
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272934
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272570
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272248
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272362
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272214
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31274626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272264
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31275684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31276000
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272612
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1348241.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273014
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1348241.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272040
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1348241.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271794
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272638
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31290280
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272504
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31280048
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31315332
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31278672
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31281604
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31283234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31274192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273084
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31274984
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31280414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271888
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273256
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272818
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1348241.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272356
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1348241.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31274394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31272678
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1348241.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31273092
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_25_1348241.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_25_1348241.31271890
</commentlist>
</conversation>
