<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_18_1340202</id>
	<title>I Use Twitter, Please Rob Me</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1266505200000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>nk497 writes <i>"Developers looking to prove a point about the information people are sharing on social networking sites have unveiled a <a href="http://www.itpro.co.uk/blogs/daveyw/2010/02/18/i-twitter-therefore-please-rob-me/">new tool called Please Rob Me</a>. It hunts out tweets from people who are also using location-based services telling the world that they're out of town, and then directs the world to go rob their house. The creators of the site said: 'Don't get us wrong, we love the whole location-aware thing. The information is very interesting and can be used to create some pretty awesome applications. However, the way in which people are stimulated to participate in sharing this information is less awesome.' How long until the first actual robbery takes place?"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>nk497 writes " Developers looking to prove a point about the information people are sharing on social networking sites have unveiled a new tool called Please Rob Me .
It hunts out tweets from people who are also using location-based services telling the world that they 're out of town , and then directs the world to go rob their house .
The creators of the site said : 'Do n't get us wrong , we love the whole location-aware thing .
The information is very interesting and can be used to create some pretty awesome applications .
However , the way in which people are stimulated to participate in sharing this information is less awesome .
' How long until the first actual robbery takes place ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nk497 writes "Developers looking to prove a point about the information people are sharing on social networking sites have unveiled a new tool called Please Rob Me.
It hunts out tweets from people who are also using location-based services telling the world that they're out of town, and then directs the world to go rob their house.
The creators of the site said: 'Don't get us wrong, we love the whole location-aware thing.
The information is very interesting and can be used to create some pretty awesome applications.
However, the way in which people are stimulated to participate in sharing this information is less awesome.
' How long until the first actual robbery takes place?
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185844</id>
	<title>Re:Release the lawyers..</title>
	<author>OldSoldier</author>
	<datestamp>1266513960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And let's not forget you can't outsource burglary... that's a job that has to stay local!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And let 's not forget you ca n't outsource burglary... that 's a job that has to stay local !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And let's not forget you can't outsource burglary... that's a job that has to stay local!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31196140</id>
	<title>Finland, the land of the free</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266520980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can leave my doors open when I leave my house, and still nobody comes in and loots my stuff.
Having good social security system prevents awful lot of robberies.
Also not letting corruption crawl into government + keeping mafia outside your country's borders helps a lot.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...still, we don't use Twitter because we kinda had this crazy SMS-frenzy back in 1990s.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can leave my doors open when I leave my house , and still nobody comes in and loots my stuff .
Having good social security system prevents awful lot of robberies .
Also not letting corruption crawl into government + keeping mafia outside your country 's borders helps a lot .
...still , we do n't use Twitter because we kinda had this crazy SMS-frenzy back in 1990s .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can leave my doors open when I leave my house, and still nobody comes in and loots my stuff.
Having good social security system prevents awful lot of robberies.
Also not letting corruption crawl into government + keeping mafia outside your country's borders helps a lot.
...still, we don't use Twitter because we kinda had this crazy SMS-frenzy back in 1990s.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184804</id>
	<title>Re:Everyone leaves their homes</title>
	<author>Mashdar</author>
	<datestamp>1266510060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But what about all those risk averse criminals who want to be sure you are &gt;30 minutes away by helicopter??</htmltext>
<tokenext>But what about all those risk averse criminals who want to be sure you are &gt; 30 minutes away by helicopter ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But what about all those risk averse criminals who want to be sure you are &gt;30 minutes away by helicopter?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31188278</id>
	<title>Re:Honeypot</title>
	<author>CorporateSuit</author>
	<datestamp>1266523200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But what about the guy who turns off the engine and leaves a post-it with the words "Give a hoot!  Don't pollute!"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But what about the guy who turns off the engine and leaves a post-it with the words " Give a hoot !
Do n't pollute !
" ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But what about the guy who turns off the engine and leaves a post-it with the words "Give a hoot!
Don't pollute!
"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184612</id>
	<title>really a good idea?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266509400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>good idea but i cant help but think this is going to be a catalyst for the "first twitter robbery"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>good idea but i cant help but think this is going to be a catalyst for the " first twitter robbery "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>good idea but i cant help but think this is going to be a catalyst for the "first twitter robbery"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31191520</id>
	<title>Finally!</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1266489420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A practical use for twitter!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A practical use for twitter !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A practical use for twitter!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186294</id>
	<title>Not all communities are soulless</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266515760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars [to] leave.</p></div></blockquote><p>Only if you live in a neighborhood where that's possible.  I never have.  There's no on-street parking where I live now.  I knew the cars of all my neighbors in the last house (and would certainly walk up to strangers sitting in their cars and ask them if I could help them with anything).  In my first house the elderly lady next door maintained 24x7 vigilance over the entire street, and would either call police or come out with a shotgun if she saw anything amiss.</p><p>Of course, if you live in an entirely soulless white-collar suburban community your remarks are 100\% applicable.  But I can't stomach those sorts of places, where nobody ever tears themselves away from the TV/Intertubes/Xbox for longer than it takes to hire a Mexican to mow the lawn.  I know all my neighbors and chat with them frequently, I know what cars belong and when.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars [ to ] leave.Only if you live in a neighborhood where that 's possible .
I never have .
There 's no on-street parking where I live now .
I knew the cars of all my neighbors in the last house ( and would certainly walk up to strangers sitting in their cars and ask them if I could help them with anything ) .
In my first house the elderly lady next door maintained 24x7 vigilance over the entire street , and would either call police or come out with a shotgun if she saw anything amiss.Of course , if you live in an entirely soulless white-collar suburban community your remarks are 100 \ % applicable .
But I ca n't stomach those sorts of places , where nobody ever tears themselves away from the TV/Intertubes/Xbox for longer than it takes to hire a Mexican to mow the lawn .
I know all my neighbors and chat with them frequently , I know what cars belong and when .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars [to] leave.Only if you live in a neighborhood where that's possible.
I never have.
There's no on-street parking where I live now.
I knew the cars of all my neighbors in the last house (and would certainly walk up to strangers sitting in their cars and ask them if I could help them with anything).
In my first house the elderly lady next door maintained 24x7 vigilance over the entire street, and would either call police or come out with a shotgun if she saw anything amiss.Of course, if you live in an entirely soulless white-collar suburban community your remarks are 100\% applicable.
But I can't stomach those sorts of places, where nobody ever tears themselves away from the TV/Intertubes/Xbox for longer than it takes to hire a Mexican to mow the lawn.
I know all my neighbors and chat with them frequently, I know what cars belong and when.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185960</id>
	<title>Re:Everyone leaves their homes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266514380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another similar situation is having an answering machine saying "I'm not home right now, please leave a message"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another similar situation is having an answering machine saying " I 'm not home right now , please leave a message "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another similar situation is having an answering machine saying "I'm not home right now, please leave a message"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184766</id>
	<title>Ouch</title>
	<author>Dunbal</author>
	<datestamp>1266509940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IANAL but I would think that the creators of this application have just made themselves wide open for anything from civil lawsuits to criminal charges (aiding and abetting?)...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IANAL but I would think that the creators of this application have just made themselves wide open for anything from civil lawsuits to criminal charges ( aiding and abetting ?
) .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IANAL but I would think that the creators of this application have just made themselves wide open for anything from civil lawsuits to criminal charges (aiding and abetting?
)...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185050</id>
	<title>You can't rob a house</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266511140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Robbery means taking something from your person or your immediate control by force or threat of force.  They most likely mean burglary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Robbery means taking something from your person or your immediate control by force or threat of force .
They most likely mean burglary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Robbery means taking something from your person or your immediate control by force or threat of force.
They most likely mean burglary.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184696</id>
	<title>erm, obvious flaws</title>
	<author>hypergreatthing</author>
	<datestamp>1266509700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't this only work on single person households where that single person twitters all day long?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't this only work on single person households where that single person twitters all day long ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't this only work on single person households where that single person twitters all day long?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186682</id>
	<title>Re:Everyone leaves their homes</title>
	<author>yali</author>
	<datestamp>1266517440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars the leave.</p></div></blockquote><p>You've got a very high opinion of criminals.
</p><p>A smart, patient, motivated criminal could probably get into 90\% of ordinary people's homes without too much trouble. But in contrast to the romanticized catburglars in movies, in the real world smart, patient, motivated people don't generally become criminals. Most actual criminals are impulsive dumbasses. This service is perfect for the "I'm jonesing for my next meth fix, where can I get some easily-pawned stuff RIGHT NOW" crowd that make up the vast majority of actual criminals.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars the leave.You 've got a very high opinion of criminals .
A smart , patient , motivated criminal could probably get into 90 \ % of ordinary people 's homes without too much trouble .
But in contrast to the romanticized catburglars in movies , in the real world smart , patient , motivated people do n't generally become criminals .
Most actual criminals are impulsive dumbasses .
This service is perfect for the " I 'm jonesing for my next meth fix , where can I get some easily-pawned stuff RIGHT NOW " crowd that make up the vast majority of actual criminals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars the leave.You've got a very high opinion of criminals.
A smart, patient, motivated criminal could probably get into 90\% of ordinary people's homes without too much trouble.
But in contrast to the romanticized catburglars in movies, in the real world smart, patient, motivated people don't generally become criminals.
Most actual criminals are impulsive dumbasses.
This service is perfect for the "I'm jonesing for my next meth fix, where can I get some easily-pawned stuff RIGHT NOW" crowd that make up the vast majority of actual criminals.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31197004</id>
	<title>Re:Everyone leaves their homes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266575340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It's the same level of surveillance that someone can do by just parking in front of your home.</i> </p><p>I don't know about you, but I can't physically park in front of a million homes at once...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the same level of surveillance that someone can do by just parking in front of your home .
I do n't know about you , but I ca n't physically park in front of a million homes at once.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the same level of surveillance that someone can do by just parking in front of your home.
I don't know about you, but I can't physically park in front of a million homes at once...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184864</id>
	<title>first web broadcast murder...</title>
	<author>VShael</author>
	<datestamp>1266510300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I give my phone to someone else, then sit at home with my webcam streaming to the web, and a gun....</p><p>Can I kill an intruder in legitimate self defence while it happens to be broadcasting to the web?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I give my phone to someone else , then sit at home with my webcam streaming to the web , and a gun....Can I kill an intruder in legitimate self defence while it happens to be broadcasting to the web ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I give my phone to someone else, then sit at home with my webcam streaming to the web, and a gun....Can I kill an intruder in legitimate self defence while it happens to be broadcasting to the web?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185086</id>
	<title>What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel?</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1266511260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><ol>
<li>Twitter that you're gon for the weekend - too bad, because you won't get to enjoy your new big-screen home theatre with media pc.</li>
<li>Wait with loaded shotguns for robbers to break in.</li>
<li>BOOM!BOOM!</li>
</ol><p>
Profit?  NRA endorsements, talk-show circuit, book deals<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Twitter that you 're gon for the weekend - too bad , because you wo n't get to enjoy your new big-screen home theatre with media pc .
Wait with loaded shotguns for robbers to break in .
BOOM ! BOOM ! Profit ?
NRA endorsements , talk-show circuit , book deals .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Twitter that you're gon for the weekend - too bad, because you won't get to enjoy your new big-screen home theatre with media pc.
Wait with loaded shotguns for robbers to break in.
BOOM!BOOM!

Profit?
NRA endorsements, talk-show circuit, book deals ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31187890</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers</title>
	<author>ThatsNotPudding</author>
	<datestamp>1266521880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> A robber would still have to peek in the windows...</p></div></blockquote><p>This is why my Roomba constantly projects a hologram of Chuck Norris.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A robber would still have to peek in the windows...This is why my Roomba constantly projects a hologram of Chuck Norris .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> A robber would still have to peek in the windows...This is why my Roomba constantly projects a hologram of Chuck Norris.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185158</id>
	<title>Re:Everyone leaves their homes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266511440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>but screaming out online where a bunch of other people are doing the exact same thing all in the same place with the same interface IS making it easier.  and this is not targeting anyone specific but anyone in general.  If the criminal is sitting in front of a house he can only see what is on that street, why not observe everyone in a city all at once without any effort.</htmltext>
<tokenext>but screaming out online where a bunch of other people are doing the exact same thing all in the same place with the same interface IS making it easier .
and this is not targeting anyone specific but anyone in general .
If the criminal is sitting in front of a house he can only see what is on that street , why not observe everyone in a city all at once without any effort .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but screaming out online where a bunch of other people are doing the exact same thing all in the same place with the same interface IS making it easier.
and this is not targeting anyone specific but anyone in general.
If the criminal is sitting in front of a house he can only see what is on that street, why not observe everyone in a city all at once without any effort.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31187344</id>
	<title>Re:Some problems and a solution</title>
	<author>julesh</author>
	<datestamp>1266520320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>1. It needs to be "please burgle me". If you aren't at home, then you are being burgled, not robbed. A robbery is theft with violence or the threat of violence</i> </p><blockquote><div><p>rob v. tr.<br>[...]<br>3.     to plunder or rifle (a house, shop, etc.).<br>Dictionary.com Unabridged<br>Based on the Random House Dictionary, &#169; Random House, Inc. 2010.</p></div> </blockquote><p>Yes, violence or threat are part of the \_main\_ definition, but the word is used informally to refer to most kinds of theft, and it is an accepted, established usage of the word.</p><p><i>2. PleaseRobMe seems to be built around the premise that one home = one person. If you know where I live, please be assured that I am currently not at my home. But other people live where I live. Families exist. Flat sharing exists. Communal living exists. (Yeah, go and raid the kibbutz - I'm sure it'll be empty!) This may be true for Web 2.0 valleyboys. It's not true of the rest of the planet.</i></p><p>Yeah, but there's likely to be enough information on a twitter account to work out all this stuff, and identify the people who live alone (who aren't that rare, after all).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
It needs to be " please burgle me " .
If you are n't at home , then you are being burgled , not robbed .
A robbery is theft with violence or the threat of violence rob v .
tr. [ ... ] 3. to plunder or rifle ( a house , shop , etc .
) .Dictionary.com UnabridgedBased on the Random House Dictionary ,   Random House , Inc. 2010. Yes , violence or threat are part of the \ _main \ _ definition , but the word is used informally to refer to most kinds of theft , and it is an accepted , established usage of the word.2 .
PleaseRobMe seems to be built around the premise that one home = one person .
If you know where I live , please be assured that I am currently not at my home .
But other people live where I live .
Families exist .
Flat sharing exists .
Communal living exists .
( Yeah , go and raid the kibbutz - I 'm sure it 'll be empty !
) This may be true for Web 2.0 valleyboys .
It 's not true of the rest of the planet.Yeah , but there 's likely to be enough information on a twitter account to work out all this stuff , and identify the people who live alone ( who are n't that rare , after all ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
It needs to be "please burgle me".
If you aren't at home, then you are being burgled, not robbed.
A robbery is theft with violence or the threat of violence rob v.
tr.[...]3.     to plunder or rifle (a house, shop, etc.
).Dictionary.com UnabridgedBased on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2010. Yes, violence or threat are part of the \_main\_ definition, but the word is used informally to refer to most kinds of theft, and it is an accepted, established usage of the word.2.
PleaseRobMe seems to be built around the premise that one home = one person.
If you know where I live, please be assured that I am currently not at my home.
But other people live where I live.
Families exist.
Flat sharing exists.
Communal living exists.
(Yeah, go and raid the kibbutz - I'm sure it'll be empty!
) This may be true for Web 2.0 valleyboys.
It's not true of the rest of the planet.Yeah, but there's likely to be enough information on a twitter account to work out all this stuff, and identify the people who live alone (who aren't that rare, after all).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31187754</id>
	<title>Re:Some problems and a solution</title>
	<author>corerunner</author>
	<datestamp>1266521520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Locale application for Android allows you to create both reminders and custom phone settings profiles based on current location, which can be read through GPS, wifi, and other means.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Locale application for Android allows you to create both reminders and custom phone settings profiles based on current location , which can be read through GPS , wifi , and other means .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Locale application for Android allows you to create both reminders and custom phone settings profiles based on current location, which can be read through GPS, wifi, and other means.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186456</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186270</id>
	<title>Re:Everyone leaves their homes</title>
	<author>Trent Hawkins</author>
	<datestamp>1266515700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The best thing to do is to twitter about your attack dog and how he bites through your coffee table whenever you leave him alone in the house (which is always).</htmltext>
<tokenext>The best thing to do is to twitter about your attack dog and how he bites through your coffee table whenever you leave him alone in the house ( which is always ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The best thing to do is to twitter about your attack dog and how he bites through your coffee table whenever you leave him alone in the house (which is always).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185784</id>
	<title>Re:Honeypot</title>
	<author>Gizzmonic</author>
	<datestamp>1266513660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Austin, the cops parked a bait car <b>with the keys in the ignition</b> in front of someone's house.    The back seat was filled with porno mags and lingerie.  The people who owned the house did not know it was a bait car, and called the police about it several times.  The police did not respond.  After a few weeks, they got sick of having the car in front of their house, so the owner of the house started the car and tried to move it to a parking lot where it would get towed.  He was arrested and charged with grand theft auto within minutes.</p><p>I don't know how such a blatant form of entrapment is even legal.  And attracting criminals into neighborhoods sounds like the opposite of what cops should be doing anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Austin , the cops parked a bait car with the keys in the ignition in front of someone 's house .
The back seat was filled with porno mags and lingerie .
The people who owned the house did not know it was a bait car , and called the police about it several times .
The police did not respond .
After a few weeks , they got sick of having the car in front of their house , so the owner of the house started the car and tried to move it to a parking lot where it would get towed .
He was arrested and charged with grand theft auto within minutes.I do n't know how such a blatant form of entrapment is even legal .
And attracting criminals into neighborhoods sounds like the opposite of what cops should be doing anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Austin, the cops parked a bait car with the keys in the ignition in front of someone's house.
The back seat was filled with porno mags and lingerie.
The people who owned the house did not know it was a bait car, and called the police about it several times.
The police did not respond.
After a few weeks, they got sick of having the car in front of their house, so the owner of the house started the car and tried to move it to a parking lot where it would get towed.
He was arrested and charged with grand theft auto within minutes.I don't know how such a blatant form of entrapment is even legal.
And attracting criminals into neighborhoods sounds like the opposite of what cops should be doing anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31192318</id>
	<title>Re:Release the lawyers..</title>
	<author>Dan541</author>
	<datestamp>1266493020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why, they are not doing anything wrong.</p><p>Any liability rests on the individual making the information public. Not the website that cites such information.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why , they are not doing anything wrong.Any liability rests on the individual making the information public .
Not the website that cites such information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why, they are not doing anything wrong.Any liability rests on the individual making the information public.
Not the website that cites such information.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185900</id>
	<title>Re:Some problems and a solution</title>
	<author>stangbat</author>
	<datestamp>1266514140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Came here to say this.  If you go to the person's home and take stuff while they are away, you are a burglar.
<br> <br>
So while we are being pedantic, I'd like to discuss the Hamburglar too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Came here to say this .
If you go to the person 's home and take stuff while they are away , you are a burglar .
So while we are being pedantic , I 'd like to discuss the Hamburglar too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Came here to say this.
If you go to the person's home and take stuff while they are away, you are a burglar.
So while we are being pedantic, I'd like to discuss the Hamburglar too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186046</id>
	<title>Re:Everyone leaves their homes</title>
	<author>jimicus</author>
	<datestamp>1266514740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Incidentally, the situation sometimes isn't helped by the legal system. Here in Western Australia, breaking into and stealing from property during the hours of daylight is regarded as a different crime from doing the same thing at night. Go figure. I didn't vote for the craniorectal that came up with that one.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-{</p></div><p>The precedent for this goes back some way - I believe in the bible it is described a different crime after dark - though I can't remember off the top of my head where in the bible exactly.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Incidentally , the situation sometimes is n't helped by the legal system .
Here in Western Australia , breaking into and stealing from property during the hours of daylight is regarded as a different crime from doing the same thing at night .
Go figure .
I did n't vote for the craniorectal that came up with that one .
: - { The precedent for this goes back some way - I believe in the bible it is described a different crime after dark - though I ca n't remember off the top of my head where in the bible exactly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Incidentally, the situation sometimes isn't helped by the legal system.
Here in Western Australia, breaking into and stealing from property during the hours of daylight is regarded as a different crime from doing the same thing at night.
Go figure.
I didn't vote for the craniorectal that came up with that one.
:-{The precedent for this goes back some way - I believe in the bible it is described a different crime after dark - though I can't remember off the top of my head where in the bible exactly.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185278</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185100</id>
	<title>Set a trap</title>
	<author>whoda</author>
	<datestamp>1266511260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm going to Greece for a week!<br>I live at 123 Main street anytown, USA<br>Bye everyone, I'm leaving now!<br>(Don't really leave, sit just inside door with shotgun)<br>?<br>Profit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm going to Greece for a week ! I live at 123 Main street anytown , USABye everyone , I 'm leaving now !
( Do n't really leave , sit just inside door with shotgun ) ? Profit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm going to Greece for a week!I live at 123 Main street anytown, USABye everyone, I'm leaving now!
(Don't really leave, sit just inside door with shotgun)?Profit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185760</id>
	<title>Google maps+streetview mashup=SWEET</title>
	<author>FreeUser</author>
	<datestamp>1266513540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone mash this up with googlemaps and streetview yet?  That would really drive the point home.</p><p>At last a little payback for all this unfettered twitter narcisism.  It's probably not very nice, but I can't help feeling more than my share of shadenfreude...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone mash this up with googlemaps and streetview yet ?
That would really drive the point home.At last a little payback for all this unfettered twitter narcisism .
It 's probably not very nice , but I ca n't help feeling more than my share of shadenfreude.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone mash this up with googlemaps and streetview yet?
That would really drive the point home.At last a little payback for all this unfettered twitter narcisism.
It's probably not very nice, but I can't help feeling more than my share of shadenfreude...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185624</id>
	<title>Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266513060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can also follow the site owner on twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/Mikepruett" title="twitter.com">http://twitter.com/Mikepruett</a> [twitter.com]
<br>
&gt;Mikepruett
<br>
&gt;Mike Pruett | Rochester, MN
<br>
&gt;@WheresKiger Just eat at a new fast food place called Nupa Express on 11thAve NW and Civic Center Drive it was GREAT  11:12 PM Sep 15th, 2009
<p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and rob HIS house when he's not home:
</p><p>
&gt;Domain name: PLEASESUEME.COM
<br>
&gt;Pruett, Mike  mlt@mltgroup.com
<br>
&gt;4012 5th Place NW, Rochester, MN 55901
</p><p>
Give him a call to tell him you appreciate being able to track him: 507-281-3490</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can also follow the site owner on twitter : http : //twitter.com/Mikepruett [ twitter.com ] &gt; Mikepruett &gt; Mike Pruett | Rochester , MN &gt; @ WheresKiger Just eat at a new fast food place called Nupa Express on 11thAve NW and Civic Center Drive it was GREAT 11 : 12 PM Sep 15th , 2009 ... and rob HIS house when he 's not home : &gt; Domain name : PLEASESUEME.COM &gt; Pruett , Mike mlt @ mltgroup.com &gt; 4012 5th Place NW , Rochester , MN 55901 Give him a call to tell him you appreciate being able to track him : 507-281-3490</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can also follow the site owner on twitter: http://twitter.com/Mikepruett [twitter.com]

&gt;Mikepruett

&gt;Mike Pruett | Rochester, MN

&gt;@WheresKiger Just eat at a new fast food place called Nupa Express on 11thAve NW and Civic Center Drive it was GREAT  11:12 PM Sep 15th, 2009
 ... and rob HIS house when he's not home:

&gt;Domain name: PLEASESUEME.COM

&gt;Pruett, Mike  mlt@mltgroup.com

&gt;4012 5th Place NW, Rochester, MN 55901

Give him a call to tell him you appreciate being able to track him: 507-281-3490</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185212</id>
	<title>Re:Release the lawyers..</title>
	<author>xaxa</author>
	<datestamp>1266511620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're also doing nothing more than putting pretty pictures round a Twitter search page: <a href="http://twitter.com/search?q=4sq\%20-@foursquare" title="twitter.com">http://twitter.com/search?q=4sq\%20-@foursquare</a> [twitter.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're also doing nothing more than putting pretty pictures round a Twitter search page : http : //twitter.com/search ? q = 4sq \ % 20- @ foursquare [ twitter.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're also doing nothing more than putting pretty pictures round a Twitter search page: http://twitter.com/search?q=4sq\%20-@foursquare [twitter.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184546</id>
	<title>Specifically Twitter shouldn't be a problem...</title>
	<author>calibre-not-output</author>
	<datestamp>1266509160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>but services like Facebook where less privacy-sensitive people might actually reveal where they live as well as when they aren't there... that's worrysome. Then again, they'd just be reaping what they sow - not that it justifies the robber, of course.</htmltext>
<tokenext>but services like Facebook where less privacy-sensitive people might actually reveal where they live as well as when they are n't there... that 's worrysome .
Then again , they 'd just be reaping what they sow - not that it justifies the robber , of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but services like Facebook where less privacy-sensitive people might actually reveal where they live as well as when they aren't there... that's worrysome.
Then again, they'd just be reaping what they sow - not that it justifies the robber, of course.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185428</id>
	<title>pedanting</title>
	<author>fulldecent</author>
	<datestamp>1266512340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So really, this should be called "Please Rob Him".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So really , this should be called " Please Rob Him " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So really, this should be called "Please Rob Him".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184690</id>
	<title>Re:Release the lawyers..</title>
	<author>Idaho</author>
	<datestamp>1266509700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doubt it, since they obviously don't live in the USA. Good for them, then<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Doubt it , since they obviously do n't live in the USA .
Good for them , then : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doubt it, since they obviously don't live in the USA.
Good for them, then :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185436</id>
	<title>Re:Just because you can...</title>
	<author>BrokenHalo</author>
	<datestamp>1266512400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>We shouldn't have to hide our information, people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff.</i> <br> <br>
That would be a nice warm fuzzy world to live in, but the truth is that on this grossly overpopulated planet, we all HAVE to hide our personal information, because the world is just too full of asswipes to just pretend they don't exist.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We should n't have to hide our information , people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff .
That would be a nice warm fuzzy world to live in , but the truth is that on this grossly overpopulated planet , we all HAVE to hide our personal information , because the world is just too full of asswipes to just pretend they do n't exist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We shouldn't have to hide our information, people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff.
That would be a nice warm fuzzy world to live in, but the truth is that on this grossly overpopulated planet, we all HAVE to hide our personal information, because the world is just too full of asswipes to just pretend they don't exist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31187356</id>
	<title>Re:Release the lawyers..</title>
	<author>sabt-pestnu</author>
	<datestamp>1266520380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What, you can only get sued <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Spamhaus\_Project#e360\_Lawsuit" title="wikipedia.org">if you live in the USA</a> [wikipedia.org]?  Mind, even if the lawsuit fails, you're still on the hook for defending against it, usually.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What , you can only get sued if you live in the USA [ wikipedia.org ] ?
Mind , even if the lawsuit fails , you 're still on the hook for defending against it , usually .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, you can only get sued if you live in the USA [wikipedia.org]?
Mind, even if the lawsuit fails, you're still on the hook for defending against it, usually.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184840</id>
	<title>Re:Everyone leaves their homes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266510180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars the leave.</p></div><p>Not in my neighbourhood, because we have a Neighbourhood Watch program. In fact, I think just about every neighbourhood I visited in my city has a Neighbourhood Watch program. So I guess there's no crime here.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars the leave.Not in my neighbourhood , because we have a Neighbourhood Watch program .
In fact , I think just about every neighbourhood I visited in my city has a Neighbourhood Watch program .
So I guess there 's no crime here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars the leave.Not in my neighbourhood, because we have a Neighbourhood Watch program.
In fact, I think just about every neighbourhood I visited in my city has a Neighbourhood Watch program.
So I guess there's no crime here.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184740</id>
	<title>Re:"How long until the first actual robbery"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266509820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most houses are empty between 9-5, MTWTrF.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most houses are empty between 9-5 , MTWTrF .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most houses are empty between 9-5, MTWTrF.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185062</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers</title>
	<author>medv4380</author>
	<datestamp>1266511140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're right but think of it this way.  When some one must regularly go and drop off a bank deposit for their business the smart ones know to vary their routine that way someone is less likely to be able to setup a robbery.  If you're tweeting your every move like "Having Tea at Ben &amp; Jerrie's" then you're giving them the information that otherwise they would have to work for.  This is really more then just robbing someones home in the end.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're right but think of it this way .
When some one must regularly go and drop off a bank deposit for their business the smart ones know to vary their routine that way someone is less likely to be able to setup a robbery .
If you 're tweeting your every move like " Having Tea at Ben &amp; Jerrie 's " then you 're giving them the information that otherwise they would have to work for .
This is really more then just robbing someones home in the end .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're right but think of it this way.
When some one must regularly go and drop off a bank deposit for their business the smart ones know to vary their routine that way someone is less likely to be able to setup a robbery.
If you're tweeting your every move like "Having Tea at Ben &amp; Jerrie's" then you're giving them the information that otherwise they would have to work for.
This is really more then just robbing someones home in the end.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185404</id>
	<title>According to twitter, the site owner isn't home</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1266512280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Last tweet, he's out eating breakfast.
<a href="ttp:twittercomMikepruett" title="ttp">ttp:twittercomMikepruett</a> [ttp]
<p>
Domain name: PLEASESUEME.COM
<br>
Administrative Contact:
<br>
Pruett, Mike  mlt@mltgroup.com
<br>
4012 5th Place NW
<br>
Rochester, MN 55901
<br>
US
<br>
507-281-3490
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Last tweet , he 's out eating breakfast .
ttp : twittercomMikepruett [ ttp ] Domain name : PLEASESUEME.COM Administrative Contact : Pruett , Mike mlt @ mltgroup.com 4012 5th Place NW Rochester , MN 55901 US 507-281-3490</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last tweet, he's out eating breakfast.
ttp:twittercomMikepruett [ttp]

Domain name: PLEASESUEME.COM

Administrative Contact:

Pruett, Mike  mlt@mltgroup.com

4012 5th Place NW

Rochester, MN 55901

US

507-281-3490
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31189160</id>
	<title>Ummm....</title>
	<author>flahwho</author>
	<datestamp>1266525780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I came home after tweeting I was out of town to find my house broken into and HOLY CRAP WHERES MY TV!?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I came home after tweeting I was out of town to find my house broken into and HOLY CRAP WHERES MY TV !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I came home after tweeting I was out of town to find my house broken into and HOLY CRAP WHERES MY TV!
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185544</id>
	<title>Re:Just because you can...</title>
	<author>Jawn98685</author>
	<datestamp>1266512760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry, this is definitely a case of "should". Clueless Twitter users (prepending "clueless" seems almost redundant...) who advertise to the world stuff that only a fool would advertise in any other medium <i>need</i> to have their noses rubbed in their own stupidity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , this is definitely a case of " should " .
Clueless Twitter users ( prepending " clueless " seems almost redundant... ) who advertise to the world stuff that only a fool would advertise in any other medium need to have their noses rubbed in their own stupidity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, this is definitely a case of "should".
Clueless Twitter users (prepending "clueless" seems almost redundant...) who advertise to the world stuff that only a fool would advertise in any other medium need to have their noses rubbed in their own stupidity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185142</id>
	<title>If you want to rob me ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266511380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please try my ex-wife's house. That's where you'll find my stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please try my ex-wife 's house .
That 's where you 'll find my stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please try my ex-wife's house.
That's where you'll find my stuff.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185278</id>
	<title>Re:Everyone leaves their homes</title>
	<author>BrokenHalo</author>
	<datestamp>1266511920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>So are a vast majority of people from between the hours of 9AM to 3PM every day.</i> <br> <br>
Incidentally, the situation sometimes isn't helped by the legal system. Here in Western Australia, breaking into and stealing from property during the hours of daylight is regarded as a different crime from doing the same thing at night. Go figure. I didn't vote for the craniorectal that came up with that one.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-{</htmltext>
<tokenext>So are a vast majority of people from between the hours of 9AM to 3PM every day .
Incidentally , the situation sometimes is n't helped by the legal system .
Here in Western Australia , breaking into and stealing from property during the hours of daylight is regarded as a different crime from doing the same thing at night .
Go figure .
I did n't vote for the craniorectal that came up with that one .
: - {</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So are a vast majority of people from between the hours of 9AM to 3PM every day.
Incidentally, the situation sometimes isn't helped by the legal system.
Here in Western Australia, breaking into and stealing from property during the hours of daylight is regarded as a different crime from doing the same thing at night.
Go figure.
I didn't vote for the craniorectal that came up with that one.
:-{</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184656</id>
	<title>The reverse side is:</title>
	<author>Theoboley</author>
	<datestamp>1266509520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You could always make a fake post stating you're going out of town for a night, then wait and see if someone shows up.  Arm yourself with a ball bat and claim self defense.<br><br>Sounds a bit premeditated.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You could always make a fake post stating you 're going out of town for a night , then wait and see if someone shows up .
Arm yourself with a ball bat and claim self defense.Sounds a bit premeditated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could always make a fake post stating you're going out of town for a night, then wait and see if someone shows up.
Arm yourself with a ball bat and claim self defense.Sounds a bit premeditated.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31190284</id>
	<title>Re:Just because you can...</title>
	<author>pclminion</author>
	<datestamp>1266485580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And here I was thinking the reason I don't rob and kill people was because I was a good person. Turns out, it's just because nobody has encouraged me to do those things. All this time I've been wrong! You've opened my eyes!</htmltext>
<tokenext>And here I was thinking the reason I do n't rob and kill people was because I was a good person .
Turns out , it 's just because nobody has encouraged me to do those things .
All this time I 've been wrong !
You 've opened my eyes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And here I was thinking the reason I don't rob and kill people was because I was a good person.
Turns out, it's just because nobody has encouraged me to do those things.
All this time I've been wrong!
You've opened my eyes!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185132</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1266511320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The site doesn't tell you whether everyone in the household is gone, only if one person in the household is gone. A robber would still have to peek in the windows and do whatever it is robbers do to make sure the house is empty. But they could do that just by walking around some random neighbourhood and peeking in random windows; they don't need Twitter to tell them to peek into someone's windows.</p></div><p>IDK, it seems like you could probably figure out whether a lot of tweeters live alone or not based their previous tweets.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The site does n't tell you whether everyone in the household is gone , only if one person in the household is gone .
A robber would still have to peek in the windows and do whatever it is robbers do to make sure the house is empty .
But they could do that just by walking around some random neighbourhood and peeking in random windows ; they do n't need Twitter to tell them to peek into someone 's windows.IDK , it seems like you could probably figure out whether a lot of tweeters live alone or not based their previous tweets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The site doesn't tell you whether everyone in the household is gone, only if one person in the household is gone.
A robber would still have to peek in the windows and do whatever it is robbers do to make sure the house is empty.
But they could do that just by walking around some random neighbourhood and peeking in random windows; they don't need Twitter to tell them to peek into someone's windows.IDK, it seems like you could probably figure out whether a lot of tweeters live alone or not based their previous tweets.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186044</id>
	<title>Re:Sweet! Free Stuff!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266514740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I recall that after a b&amp;e at my home in late 2007, that someone asked me if I was going to watch the Grey Cup on my tv (note: I'm Canadian, eh). My response was that I was sure <b>someone</b> would be watching the game on my tv, but it wouldn't be me.</p><p>*footnote: insurance fixed me up nicely, so I actually came out ahead in the final accounting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I recall that after a b&amp;e at my home in late 2007 , that someone asked me if I was going to watch the Grey Cup on my tv ( note : I 'm Canadian , eh ) .
My response was that I was sure someone would be watching the game on my tv , but it would n't be me .
* footnote : insurance fixed me up nicely , so I actually came out ahead in the final accounting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I recall that after a b&amp;e at my home in late 2007, that someone asked me if I was going to watch the Grey Cup on my tv (note: I'm Canadian, eh).
My response was that I was sure someone would be watching the game on my tv, but it wouldn't be me.
*footnote: insurance fixed me up nicely, so I actually came out ahead in the final accounting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31191558</id>
	<title>Re:"How long until the first actual robbery"</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1266489540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I am dead and still tweeting, someone please come and either:</p><p>A) unbury me! (somehow I doubt that is an actual word)</p><p>or</p><p>B) give me their Braaains!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I am dead and still tweeting , someone please come and either : A ) unbury me !
( somehow I doubt that is an actual word ) orB ) give me their Braaains !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I am dead and still tweeting, someone please come and either:A) unbury me!
(somehow I doubt that is an actual word)orB) give me their Braaains!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186638</id>
	<title>Re:Honeypot</title>
	<author>colinrichardday</author>
	<datestamp>1266517200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Couldn't they have had it towed instead?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could n't they have had it towed instead ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Couldn't they have had it towed instead?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31188028</id>
	<title>Re:Google maps+streetview mashup=SWEET</title>
	<author>ajs</author>
	<datestamp>1266522300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... this unfettered twitter narcisism<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p> </div><p>No, I just can't buy into this any longer.</p><p>There's nothing narcissistic in posting something to Twitter/Buzz/Facebook. The problem is that it's not clear who the audience is. I just posted something to buzz about a local restaurant I was getting takeout from. Someone might look at that and say, "why do we care?" On the other hand, the post achieved its purpose: it incited conversation among my friends about where to eat in the area.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... this unfettered twitter narcisism ... No , I just ca n't buy into this any longer.There 's nothing narcissistic in posting something to Twitter/Buzz/Facebook .
The problem is that it 's not clear who the audience is .
I just posted something to buzz about a local restaurant I was getting takeout from .
Someone might look at that and say , " why do we care ?
" On the other hand , the post achieved its purpose : it incited conversation among my friends about where to eat in the area .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... this unfettered twitter narcisism ... No, I just can't buy into this any longer.There's nothing narcissistic in posting something to Twitter/Buzz/Facebook.
The problem is that it's not clear who the audience is.
I just posted something to buzz about a local restaurant I was getting takeout from.
Someone might look at that and say, "why do we care?
" On the other hand, the post achieved its purpose: it incited conversation among my friends about where to eat in the area.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185796</id>
	<title>Shouldn't be illegal . . .</title>
	<author>YenTheFirst</author>
	<datestamp>1266513660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd be really dissapointed if these guys got sued.<p>The <i>only</i> thing they're doing is scanning twitter for foursquare addresses, and prepending an "I'm out of the house".</p><p>
They aren't publishing information that wasn't already public, or even aggregating it in new and creative ways. They're just recontextualizing posts people are already putting online!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd be really dissapointed if these guys got sued.The only thing they 're doing is scanning twitter for foursquare addresses , and prepending an " I 'm out of the house " .
They are n't publishing information that was n't already public , or even aggregating it in new and creative ways .
They 're just recontextualizing posts people are already putting online !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd be really dissapointed if these guys got sued.The only thing they're doing is scanning twitter for foursquare addresses, and prepending an "I'm out of the house".
They aren't publishing information that wasn't already public, or even aggregating it in new and creative ways.
They're just recontextualizing posts people are already putting online!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186578</id>
	<title>Re:Everyone leaves their homes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266516900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>9AM to 3PM? WTF? You only work 5 fucking hours a day?</p><p>Most of us have real jobs where it's 8AM to 5PM and that makes it about 7AM to 6PM once you add the commuting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>9AM to 3PM ?
WTF ? You only work 5 fucking hours a day ? Most of us have real jobs where it 's 8AM to 5PM and that makes it about 7AM to 6PM once you add the commuting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>9AM to 3PM?
WTF? You only work 5 fucking hours a day?Most of us have real jobs where it's 8AM to 5PM and that makes it about 7AM to 6PM once you add the commuting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184936</id>
	<title>Re:"How long until the first actual robbery"</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1266510540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The difference between that and this is that generally, you have to stalk someones facebook status to notice when they're out of town, and thats when you strike.</p><p>Developers wrote a tool to follow tweets and then inform its users "This person is gone." - Basically automating the step of following people and sifting through tweets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The difference between that and this is that generally , you have to stalk someones facebook status to notice when they 're out of town , and thats when you strike.Developers wrote a tool to follow tweets and then inform its users " This person is gone .
" - Basically automating the step of following people and sifting through tweets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The difference between that and this is that generally, you have to stalk someones facebook status to notice when they're out of town, and thats when you strike.Developers wrote a tool to follow tweets and then inform its users "This person is gone.
" - Basically automating the step of following people and sifting through tweets.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186080</id>
	<title>Re:"How long until the first actual robbery"</title>
	<author>Cro Magnon</author>
	<datestamp>1266514860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I live in an older area, where many people, including me, don't have garages.  It's fairly easy to tell that I'm not home because my car is gone.  They don't even need to know my schedule.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in an older area , where many people , including me , do n't have garages .
It 's fairly easy to tell that I 'm not home because my car is gone .
They do n't even need to know my schedule .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in an older area, where many people, including me, don't have garages.
It's fairly easy to tell that I'm not home because my car is gone.
They don't even need to know my schedule.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184568</id>
	<title>Re:"How long until the first actual robbery"</title>
	<author>i.r.id10t</author>
	<datestamp>1266509220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And before facebook (or any other social networking stuff) there were the obituaries in the local paper...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And before facebook ( or any other social networking stuff ) there were the obituaries in the local paper.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And before facebook (or any other social networking stuff) there were the obituaries in the local paper...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185898</id>
	<title>So what?</title>
	<author>davmoo</author>
	<datestamp>1266514140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe I'm not home, and maybe I have announced that on twitter.  But my pit bull is always home and he doesn't use twitter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I 'm not home , and maybe I have announced that on twitter .
But my pit bull is always home and he does n't use twitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I'm not home, and maybe I have announced that on twitter.
But my pit bull is always home and he doesn't use twitter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31188904</id>
	<title>Re:Everyone leaves their homes</title>
	<author>zill</author>
	<datestamp>1266525060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars the leave.</p></div><p>They might get arrested (or at least harrassed) for loitering if they physically stake out a house. Using non-physical stalking methods is much safer.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars the leave.They might get arrested ( or at least harrassed ) for loitering if they physically stake out a house .
Using non-physical stalking methods is much safer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars the leave.They might get arrested (or at least harrassed) for loitering if they physically stake out a house.
Using non-physical stalking methods is much safer.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185762</id>
	<title>Re:Everyone leaves their homes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266513600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't park in front of just one house. I use Twitter to profile the activity of an entire city and Concorde to find an optimal tour and dynamic programming to optimally fill my Knapsack. I am smarter than the average burglar.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't park in front of just one house .
I use Twitter to profile the activity of an entire city and Concorde to find an optimal tour and dynamic programming to optimally fill my Knapsack .
I am smarter than the average burglar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't park in front of just one house.
I use Twitter to profile the activity of an entire city and Concorde to find an optimal tour and dynamic programming to optimally fill my Knapsack.
I am smarter than the average burglar.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185584</id>
	<title>Re:You can question their methods...</title>
	<author>FlyingBishop</author>
	<datestamp>1266513000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most rapes aren't reported. It's probably already happened quite a bit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most rapes are n't reported .
It 's probably already happened quite a bit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most rapes aren't reported.
It's probably already happened quite a bit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185402</id>
	<title>Re:"How long until the first actual robbery"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266512280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>7-3?  That is not a common work time frame where I'm from.  What country are you from?</htmltext>
<tokenext>7-3 ?
That is not a common work time frame where I 'm from .
What country are you from ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>7-3?
That is not a common work time frame where I'm from.
What country are you from?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31191072</id>
	<title>Re:You can question their methods...</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1266487860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slip her an ambien, wait 30 minutes, she won't remember any of it.  2 or 3 ambien if she's sober.</p><p>Its surely already happened with more traditional date rape drugs anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slip her an ambien , wait 30 minutes , she wo n't remember any of it .
2 or 3 ambien if she 's sober.Its surely already happened with more traditional date rape drugs anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slip her an ambien, wait 30 minutes, she won't remember any of it.
2 or 3 ambien if she's sober.Its surely already happened with more traditional date rape drugs anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185364</id>
	<title>Mmm, well according to my Simpsons</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266512100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mmm, well according to my Simpsons guide to everything I need to know about the US of A, it don't work if you invite them in. Could be called entrapment. Honey traps by the cops are legal because they don't entice people to break into those honey pots, they don't leave extra valuable stuff in the car or leave the door open or something like that, just another parked car, no enticement == funny arrest videos.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mmm , well according to my Simpsons guide to everything I need to know about the US of A , it do n't work if you invite them in .
Could be called entrapment .
Honey traps by the cops are legal because they do n't entice people to break into those honey pots , they do n't leave extra valuable stuff in the car or leave the door open or something like that , just another parked car , no enticement = = funny arrest videos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mmm, well according to my Simpsons guide to everything I need to know about the US of A, it don't work if you invite them in.
Could be called entrapment.
Honey traps by the cops are legal because they don't entice people to break into those honey pots, they don't leave extra valuable stuff in the car or leave the door open or something like that, just another parked car, no enticement == funny arrest videos.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184664</id>
	<title>Hmmm...listen closely...</title>
	<author>geemon</author>
	<datestamp>1266509580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hear insurance scammers quietly whispering about new schemes throughout the US about how to use this to their benefit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hear insurance scammers quietly whispering about new schemes throughout the US about how to use this to their benefit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hear insurance scammers quietly whispering about new schemes throughout the US about how to use this to their benefit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184604</id>
	<title>Honeypot</title>
	<author>srussia</author>
	<datestamp>1266509400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's just like those "bait cars" the cops use.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's just like those " bait cars " the cops use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's just like those "bait cars" the cops use.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186286</id>
	<title>Re:"How long until the first actual robbery"</title>
	<author>DavidTC</author>
	<datestamp>1266515760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except Facebook doesn't have location stats, and you need permission to see their info.</p><p>
With twitter, it's entirely possible to design a tool that a) follows people automatically, b) sees if they are posting location-giving tweets, c) determines where their house is from said tweets (Pretty easy, statistically), and  then d) notices when they are 250+ miles away from that house. (I actually think you can see people's tweets without following them, so I think (a) is not needed.)</p><p>
At that point, it can involve a human, perhaps even showing them the tweets before they relocated to actually see what's going on, how long they will be on vacation, and if their house is empty. Perhaps it could even search for references to 'wife' or 'roommate', alerting the criminal that said victim has one and they need to discover if this person is out of town also.</p><p>
You really could automate 95\% of all this, finding locations that are about 50\% likely to be someone on vacation. And sometimes will be a coffee shop and sometimes there will be someone else there, but it's much easier than trying to find the people on vacation randomly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except Facebook does n't have location stats , and you need permission to see their info .
With twitter , it 's entirely possible to design a tool that a ) follows people automatically , b ) sees if they are posting location-giving tweets , c ) determines where their house is from said tweets ( Pretty easy , statistically ) , and then d ) notices when they are 250 + miles away from that house .
( I actually think you can see people 's tweets without following them , so I think ( a ) is not needed .
) At that point , it can involve a human , perhaps even showing them the tweets before they relocated to actually see what 's going on , how long they will be on vacation , and if their house is empty .
Perhaps it could even search for references to 'wife ' or 'roommate ' , alerting the criminal that said victim has one and they need to discover if this person is out of town also .
You really could automate 95 \ % of all this , finding locations that are about 50 \ % likely to be someone on vacation .
And sometimes will be a coffee shop and sometimes there will be someone else there , but it 's much easier than trying to find the people on vacation randomly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except Facebook doesn't have location stats, and you need permission to see their info.
With twitter, it's entirely possible to design a tool that a) follows people automatically, b) sees if they are posting location-giving tweets, c) determines where their house is from said tweets (Pretty easy, statistically), and  then d) notices when they are 250+ miles away from that house.
(I actually think you can see people's tweets without following them, so I think (a) is not needed.
)
At that point, it can involve a human, perhaps even showing them the tweets before they relocated to actually see what's going on, how long they will be on vacation, and if their house is empty.
Perhaps it could even search for references to 'wife' or 'roommate', alerting the criminal that said victim has one and they need to discover if this person is out of town also.
You really could automate 95\% of all this, finding locations that are about 50\% likely to be someone on vacation.
And sometimes will be a coffee shop and sometimes there will be someone else there, but it's much easier than trying to find the people on vacation randomly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184572</id>
	<title>I forsee trouble for twitter</title>
	<author>Shivetya</author>
	<datestamp>1266509280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and companies providing location services as they are more likely to have money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and companies providing location services as they are more likely to have money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and companies providing location services as they are more likely to have money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185714</id>
	<title>Re:poor thieves</title>
	<author>Archangel Michael</author>
	<datestamp>1266513420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Personally I don't have a problem with this kind of thing. Really, I don't. Want to rob, consider it a hazardous conditions.</p><p>I mean if someone wants to fuck with my stuff, then they have to fuck with me and my big guns. We shouldn't be protecting the asshats on the off chance that a drunk guy broken into my house accidentally, or it was a couple of stupid kids.</p><p>Stupid should hurt. Criminals are stupid lazy asshats for the most part, who are antisocial to boot.</p><p>I'm sick and tired of people who want to coddle the criminals while they are committing crimes. You breaking the law? Then you're responsible for what happens to you, and all that you do.</p><p>Seriously, criminals shouldn't have rights while they are committing crimes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Personally I do n't have a problem with this kind of thing .
Really , I do n't .
Want to rob , consider it a hazardous conditions.I mean if someone wants to fuck with my stuff , then they have to fuck with me and my big guns .
We should n't be protecting the asshats on the off chance that a drunk guy broken into my house accidentally , or it was a couple of stupid kids.Stupid should hurt .
Criminals are stupid lazy asshats for the most part , who are antisocial to boot.I 'm sick and tired of people who want to coddle the criminals while they are committing crimes .
You breaking the law ?
Then you 're responsible for what happens to you , and all that you do.Seriously , criminals should n't have rights while they are committing crimes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personally I don't have a problem with this kind of thing.
Really, I don't.
Want to rob, consider it a hazardous conditions.I mean if someone wants to fuck with my stuff, then they have to fuck with me and my big guns.
We shouldn't be protecting the asshats on the off chance that a drunk guy broken into my house accidentally, or it was a couple of stupid kids.Stupid should hurt.
Criminals are stupid lazy asshats for the most part, who are antisocial to boot.I'm sick and tired of people who want to coddle the criminals while they are committing crimes.
You breaking the law?
Then you're responsible for what happens to you, and all that you do.Seriously, criminals shouldn't have rights while they are committing crimes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184654</id>
	<title>How long?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266509520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought this has already happened a few times in the United States.  Im at work so I cant research for it though.</p><p>This is yet another reason I don't use a number of the social networking services.  Just like the one which shows your location to your friends.  Unless I am lost in some massive state park, I see no use.  And if you going to say that "Only those who you want to see you profile can" (regardless of social service), who's to say that one of your "friends" robs you.  Just dont see the practical point in most of these services.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought this has already happened a few times in the United States .
Im at work so I cant research for it though.This is yet another reason I do n't use a number of the social networking services .
Just like the one which shows your location to your friends .
Unless I am lost in some massive state park , I see no use .
And if you going to say that " Only those who you want to see you profile can " ( regardless of social service ) , who 's to say that one of your " friends " robs you .
Just dont see the practical point in most of these services .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought this has already happened a few times in the United States.
Im at work so I cant research for it though.This is yet another reason I don't use a number of the social networking services.
Just like the one which shows your location to your friends.
Unless I am lost in some massive state park, I see no use.
And if you going to say that "Only those who you want to see you profile can" (regardless of social service), who's to say that one of your "friends" robs you.
Just dont see the practical point in most of these services.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508</id>
	<title>"How long until the first actual robbery"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266508980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This isn't news. People's houses are cleared out regularly due to their Facebook status.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't news .
People 's houses are cleared out regularly due to their Facebook status .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't news.
People's houses are cleared out regularly due to their Facebook status.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185630</id>
	<title>Re:Funny Webcomic on this Topic</title>
	<author>XxtraLarGe</author>
	<datestamp>1266513060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think you should be modded down, but you could have just posted the link the site using an HREF tag, and that probably would have been looked upon more favorably.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think you should be modded down , but you could have just posted the link the site using an HREF tag , and that probably would have been looked upon more favorably .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think you should be modded down, but you could have just posted the link the site using an HREF tag, and that probably would have been looked upon more favorably.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184958</id>
	<title>Re:Release the lawyers..</title>
	<author>kai\_hiwatari</author>
	<datestamp>1266510720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I sense some legal trouble for these guys in the near future..</p></div><p>I don't think there is any ground for those people to be sued. They are only using publicly available information - nothing wrong in that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I sense some legal trouble for these guys in the near future..I do n't think there is any ground for those people to be sued .
They are only using publicly available information - nothing wrong in that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I sense some legal trouble for these guys in the near future..I don't think there is any ground for those people to be sued.
They are only using publicly available information - nothing wrong in that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185644</id>
	<title>Some problems and a solution</title>
	<author>bbtom</author>
	<datestamp>1266513120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. It needs to be "please burgle me". If you aren't at home, then you are being burgled, not robbed. A robbery is theft with violence or the threat of violence (at least in English law - Theft Act 1958 - it is). If nobody is at home, then nobody can be the victim of violence or the threat of violence. So your home is getting burgled - or, if you are an American, burglarized (what the hell kind of a word is that, right?).</p><p>2. PleaseRobMe seems to be built around the premise that one home = one person. If you know where I live, please be assured that I am currently not at my home. But other people live where I live. Families exist. Flat sharing exists. Communal living exists. (Yeah, go and raid the kibbutz - I'm sure it'll be empty!) This may be true for Web 2.0 valleyboys. It's not true of the rest of the planet.</p><p>That said, this kind of thing does show why most location-based services are stupidly designed. I have played around with a few of them, and the only one I'm a real big fan of is FireEagle. Sadly, it's been a bit neglected for business reasons - i.e. Yahoo! financial situation. What is great about FireEagle is you share you location with FireEagle, and they then share it with whatever services you want to share it with. So, I have the little iPhone app which updates FireEagle. FireEagle knows exactly where I am. Then there's a Facebook app which connects to FireEagle, but I don't necessarily have to let it broadcast my location if I don't want it to. Or I can only give a vague location - perhaps at a country or city level. I have it wired in to my SSH setup, so if I SSH in to my Linux box from certain places, it updates my location. Because it is a location broker, it can be updated in any way people think of, rather than having to use a specific application (say, for the iPhone) like FourSquare etc. do.</p><p>This is useful as I can build applications that sit on top of it. One I have been meaning to build is a "remind me when I'm at X" app. So I could basically dump a string (SMS/tweet length) into a database with a broad location in it. It could check against my location and when they match, I could be reminded of X. Remember to buy ice cream when I'm at the supermarket - well, when I'm at the supermarket, I should get a text message saying to buy ice cream.</p><p>Location-based services shouldn't be tied to devices but to people. This is what everyone gets wrong. They need really good granular privacy controls. They need a big "forget me" option. This is something Google Latitude doesn't have. There is no way I have found to tell Google Latitude "Hey, take me off the radar. I'm not anywhere anymore."</p><p>When I have some time to build it, I'd love to build something like FireEagle but running on my servers and just for me. Location is too important, useful and fun to trust Google or Yahoo! or some venture-backed Valley startup with. But if you are building location-based services, look at FireEagle and learn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
It needs to be " please burgle me " .
If you are n't at home , then you are being burgled , not robbed .
A robbery is theft with violence or the threat of violence ( at least in English law - Theft Act 1958 - it is ) .
If nobody is at home , then nobody can be the victim of violence or the threat of violence .
So your home is getting burgled - or , if you are an American , burglarized ( what the hell kind of a word is that , right ? ) .2 .
PleaseRobMe seems to be built around the premise that one home = one person .
If you know where I live , please be assured that I am currently not at my home .
But other people live where I live .
Families exist .
Flat sharing exists .
Communal living exists .
( Yeah , go and raid the kibbutz - I 'm sure it 'll be empty !
) This may be true for Web 2.0 valleyboys .
It 's not true of the rest of the planet.That said , this kind of thing does show why most location-based services are stupidly designed .
I have played around with a few of them , and the only one I 'm a real big fan of is FireEagle .
Sadly , it 's been a bit neglected for business reasons - i.e .
Yahoo ! financial situation .
What is great about FireEagle is you share you location with FireEagle , and they then share it with whatever services you want to share it with .
So , I have the little iPhone app which updates FireEagle .
FireEagle knows exactly where I am .
Then there 's a Facebook app which connects to FireEagle , but I do n't necessarily have to let it broadcast my location if I do n't want it to .
Or I can only give a vague location - perhaps at a country or city level .
I have it wired in to my SSH setup , so if I SSH in to my Linux box from certain places , it updates my location .
Because it is a location broker , it can be updated in any way people think of , rather than having to use a specific application ( say , for the iPhone ) like FourSquare etc .
do.This is useful as I can build applications that sit on top of it .
One I have been meaning to build is a " remind me when I 'm at X " app .
So I could basically dump a string ( SMS/tweet length ) into a database with a broad location in it .
It could check against my location and when they match , I could be reminded of X. Remember to buy ice cream when I 'm at the supermarket - well , when I 'm at the supermarket , I should get a text message saying to buy ice cream.Location-based services should n't be tied to devices but to people .
This is what everyone gets wrong .
They need really good granular privacy controls .
They need a big " forget me " option .
This is something Google Latitude does n't have .
There is no way I have found to tell Google Latitude " Hey , take me off the radar .
I 'm not anywhere anymore .
" When I have some time to build it , I 'd love to build something like FireEagle but running on my servers and just for me .
Location is too important , useful and fun to trust Google or Yahoo !
or some venture-backed Valley startup with .
But if you are building location-based services , look at FireEagle and learn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
It needs to be "please burgle me".
If you aren't at home, then you are being burgled, not robbed.
A robbery is theft with violence or the threat of violence (at least in English law - Theft Act 1958 - it is).
If nobody is at home, then nobody can be the victim of violence or the threat of violence.
So your home is getting burgled - or, if you are an American, burglarized (what the hell kind of a word is that, right?).2.
PleaseRobMe seems to be built around the premise that one home = one person.
If you know where I live, please be assured that I am currently not at my home.
But other people live where I live.
Families exist.
Flat sharing exists.
Communal living exists.
(Yeah, go and raid the kibbutz - I'm sure it'll be empty!
) This may be true for Web 2.0 valleyboys.
It's not true of the rest of the planet.That said, this kind of thing does show why most location-based services are stupidly designed.
I have played around with a few of them, and the only one I'm a real big fan of is FireEagle.
Sadly, it's been a bit neglected for business reasons - i.e.
Yahoo! financial situation.
What is great about FireEagle is you share you location with FireEagle, and they then share it with whatever services you want to share it with.
So, I have the little iPhone app which updates FireEagle.
FireEagle knows exactly where I am.
Then there's a Facebook app which connects to FireEagle, but I don't necessarily have to let it broadcast my location if I don't want it to.
Or I can only give a vague location - perhaps at a country or city level.
I have it wired in to my SSH setup, so if I SSH in to my Linux box from certain places, it updates my location.
Because it is a location broker, it can be updated in any way people think of, rather than having to use a specific application (say, for the iPhone) like FourSquare etc.
do.This is useful as I can build applications that sit on top of it.
One I have been meaning to build is a "remind me when I'm at X" app.
So I could basically dump a string (SMS/tweet length) into a database with a broad location in it.
It could check against my location and when they match, I could be reminded of X. Remember to buy ice cream when I'm at the supermarket - well, when I'm at the supermarket, I should get a text message saying to buy ice cream.Location-based services shouldn't be tied to devices but to people.
This is what everyone gets wrong.
They need really good granular privacy controls.
They need a big "forget me" option.
This is something Google Latitude doesn't have.
There is no way I have found to tell Google Latitude "Hey, take me off the radar.
I'm not anywhere anymore.
"When I have some time to build it, I'd love to build something like FireEagle but running on my servers and just for me.
Location is too important, useful and fun to trust Google or Yahoo!
or some venture-backed Valley startup with.
But if you are building location-based services, look at FireEagle and learn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184770</id>
	<title>Re:Just because you can...</title>
	<author>mark-t</author>
	<datestamp>1266509940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Of course, but endorsing the breaking of the law is also illegal...
</p><p>
It's one thing to say that somebody else is out of town for a few days, it's quite another to actually recommend or suggest that somebody really rob his house while they are away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , but endorsing the breaking of the law is also illegal.. . It 's one thing to say that somebody else is out of town for a few days , it 's quite another to actually recommend or suggest that somebody really rob his house while they are away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Of course, but endorsing the breaking of the law is also illegal...

It's one thing to say that somebody else is out of town for a few days, it's quite another to actually recommend or suggest that somebody really rob his house while they are away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184538</id>
	<title>poor thieves</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266509100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can also imagine guys tweeting as if they were on holidays, but being home-entrenched and armed to the teeth, just for the fun of shooting at thieves.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can also imagine guys tweeting as if they were on holidays , but being home-entrenched and armed to the teeth , just for the fun of shooting at thieves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can also imagine guys tweeting as if they were on holidays, but being home-entrenched and armed to the teeth, just for the fun of shooting at thieves.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184566</id>
	<title>Just because you can...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266509220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>doesn't mean you should.<br>
<br>
It is one thing for unscrupulous behavior to happen, it is another to encourage it.  Their motives may be "pure" in that they are trying to bring awareness about what people know about you and what "could" happen.  That doesn't mean it should happen.  Not everyone is a crook and we should all strive to not be crooks, it is better for everyone.  There used to be a time when everyone left there doors unlocked and trusted the community to not rob them.  Now the community is encouraging people to rob people.  The issue isn't people sharing their information, its people like these guys who are just being ass holes.  We shouldn't have to hide our information, people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff.</htmltext>
<tokenext>does n't mean you should .
It is one thing for unscrupulous behavior to happen , it is another to encourage it .
Their motives may be " pure " in that they are trying to bring awareness about what people know about you and what " could " happen .
That does n't mean it should happen .
Not everyone is a crook and we should all strive to not be crooks , it is better for everyone .
There used to be a time when everyone left there doors unlocked and trusted the community to not rob them .
Now the community is encouraging people to rob people .
The issue is n't people sharing their information , its people like these guys who are just being ass holes .
We should n't have to hide our information , people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>doesn't mean you should.
It is one thing for unscrupulous behavior to happen, it is another to encourage it.
Their motives may be "pure" in that they are trying to bring awareness about what people know about you and what "could" happen.
That doesn't mean it should happen.
Not everyone is a crook and we should all strive to not be crooks, it is better for everyone.
There used to be a time when everyone left there doors unlocked and trusted the community to not rob them.
Now the community is encouraging people to rob people.
The issue isn't people sharing their information, its people like these guys who are just being ass holes.
We shouldn't have to hide our information, people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185896</id>
	<title>Reducing Costs</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1266514140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The issue isn't people sharing their information, its people like these guys who are just being ass holes.</i></p><p>That's exactly right.  The <i>only</i> value of any security measure is to increase the costs for the bad guys (whomever that is from your perspective) to do you harm.</p><p>This service decreases the costs of finding people to harm.  Without this service, the costs are much higher, so this service potentially does real harm.  Heck, an unlocked house without this service is probably more secure than a locked house with this service - that speaks to the level of harm.</p><p>Maybe when somebody posts the home addresses of those involved they'll get it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The issue is n't people sharing their information , its people like these guys who are just being ass holes.That 's exactly right .
The only value of any security measure is to increase the costs for the bad guys ( whomever that is from your perspective ) to do you harm.This service decreases the costs of finding people to harm .
Without this service , the costs are much higher , so this service potentially does real harm .
Heck , an unlocked house without this service is probably more secure than a locked house with this service - that speaks to the level of harm.Maybe when somebody posts the home addresses of those involved they 'll get it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The issue isn't people sharing their information, its people like these guys who are just being ass holes.That's exactly right.
The only value of any security measure is to increase the costs for the bad guys (whomever that is from your perspective) to do you harm.This service decreases the costs of finding people to harm.
Without this service, the costs are much higher, so this service potentially does real harm.
Heck, an unlocked house without this service is probably more secure than a locked house with this service - that speaks to the level of harm.Maybe when somebody posts the home addresses of those involved they'll get it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185992</id>
	<title>Re:Release the lawyers..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266514500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In most countries incitement to commit a crime is a crime itself. Proving it is a different matter but a very incriminating criterion is that if a crime wouldn't have been committed if it wasn't for the incitement, the incitement was criminal. So if it can be proven that someone committing a robbery used information that was gathered by these developers, they will be in trouble because of what they call their tool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In most countries incitement to commit a crime is a crime itself .
Proving it is a different matter but a very incriminating criterion is that if a crime would n't have been committed if it was n't for the incitement , the incitement was criminal .
So if it can be proven that someone committing a robbery used information that was gathered by these developers , they will be in trouble because of what they call their tool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In most countries incitement to commit a crime is a crime itself.
Proving it is a different matter but a very incriminating criterion is that if a crime wouldn't have been committed if it wasn't for the incitement, the incitement was criminal.
So if it can be proven that someone committing a robbery used information that was gathered by these developers, they will be in trouble because of what they call their tool.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186488</id>
	<title>Re:Release the lawyers..</title>
	<author>digitig</author>
	<datestamp>1266516540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And anyway, there's a fundamental flaw in the argument. It assumes that people live alone, so when they're out the house is empty. Oh, wait, this is people who twitter, isn't it? Sorry, my mistake,</htmltext>
<tokenext>And anyway , there 's a fundamental flaw in the argument .
It assumes that people live alone , so when they 're out the house is empty .
Oh , wait , this is people who twitter , is n't it ?
Sorry , my mistake,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And anyway, there's a fundamental flaw in the argument.
It assumes that people live alone, so when they're out the house is empty.
Oh, wait, this is people who twitter, isn't it?
Sorry, my mistake,</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185696</id>
	<title>Idea time...</title>
	<author>Arimus</author>
	<datestamp>1266513300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. I have a couple of large dogs.<br>2. The dogs need feeding.<br>3. Food is expensive.<br>4. Tweet I'm going away for a few days and have left xyz on the desk oh dear.<br>5. Dogs fed.<br>6. Profit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
I have a couple of large dogs.2 .
The dogs need feeding.3 .
Food is expensive.4 .
Tweet I 'm going away for a few days and have left xyz on the desk oh dear.5 .
Dogs fed.6 .
Profit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
I have a couple of large dogs.2.
The dogs need feeding.3.
Food is expensive.4.
Tweet I'm going away for a few days and have left xyz on the desk oh dear.5.
Dogs fed.6.
Profit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185528</id>
	<title>economic value of twitter</title>
	<author>hellothatsme</author>
	<datestamp>1266512700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cool, I dont understand how people can still state there is no money in these twitter web 2.0 services. The site needs some improvements though: there should be a twitter robbery feed to better spread the news which robber chose which house, its quite sad to look through the broken window of MrsMelanies house with 10 other potential robbers and see, that the flatscreen tv is already gone.

Keep up the good work, its time for the premium services!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cool , I dont understand how people can still state there is no money in these twitter web 2.0 services .
The site needs some improvements though : there should be a twitter robbery feed to better spread the news which robber chose which house , its quite sad to look through the broken window of MrsMelanies house with 10 other potential robbers and see , that the flatscreen tv is already gone .
Keep up the good work , its time for the premium services !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cool, I dont understand how people can still state there is no money in these twitter web 2.0 services.
The site needs some improvements though: there should be a twitter robbery feed to better spread the news which robber chose which house, its quite sad to look through the broken window of MrsMelanies house with 10 other potential robbers and see, that the flatscreen tv is already gone.
Keep up the good work, its time for the premium services!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184814</id>
	<title>Funny Webcomic on this Topic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266510120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>At the risk of web whoring (I hope this isn't considered that, because I'm on topic), I posted a webcomic on this topic today at www.lunatechfringe.com.
I'd just post the comic directly but I don't think there's a way to attach images.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At the risk of web whoring ( I hope this is n't considered that , because I 'm on topic ) , I posted a webcomic on this topic today at www.lunatechfringe.com .
I 'd just post the comic directly but I do n't think there 's a way to attach images .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At the risk of web whoring (I hope this isn't considered that, because I'm on topic), I posted a webcomic on this topic today at www.lunatechfringe.com.
I'd just post the comic directly but I don't think there's a way to attach images.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185400</id>
	<title>How many bears do you know that use twitter?</title>
	<author>SmallFurryCreature</author>
	<datestamp>1266512280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>10am, hibernating.
</p><p>11am, hibernating.
</p><p>12am, hibernating.
</p><p>1pm, hibernating.
</p><p>2pm, hibernating.
</p><p>3pm, hibernating.
</p><p>4pm, hibernating.
</p><p>5pm, hibernating.
</p><p>6pm, hibernating.
</p><p>7pm, ate hitchhiker.
</p><p>8pm, hibernating.
</p><p>9pm, hibernating.
</p><p>Mind you, considering the average tweeter, this is actually pretty riveting stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>10am , hibernating .
11am , hibernating .
12am , hibernating .
1pm , hibernating .
2pm , hibernating .
3pm , hibernating .
4pm , hibernating .
5pm , hibernating .
6pm , hibernating .
7pm , ate hitchhiker .
8pm , hibernating .
9pm , hibernating .
Mind you , considering the average tweeter , this is actually pretty riveting stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>10am, hibernating.
11am, hibernating.
12am, hibernating.
1pm, hibernating.
2pm, hibernating.
3pm, hibernating.
4pm, hibernating.
5pm, hibernating.
6pm, hibernating.
7pm, ate hitchhiker.
8pm, hibernating.
9pm, hibernating.
Mind you, considering the average tweeter, this is actually pretty riveting stuff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185750</id>
	<title>Status</title>
	<author>lymond01</author>
	<datestamp>1266513540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>8:35 AM: On vacation until March.  However, I'm contributing to the American economy by having hired 24-7 shark handlers and focused light and radiation engineers.  The night shift guy is precisely 1/8th my size.</p><p>8:37:  Muahahaha.  Muahahahah.  Muahahahahahahahahaha.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>8 : 35 AM : On vacation until March .
However , I 'm contributing to the American economy by having hired 24-7 shark handlers and focused light and radiation engineers .
The night shift guy is precisely 1/8th my size.8 : 37 : Muahahaha .
Muahahahah. Muahahahahahahahahaha .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>8:35 AM: On vacation until March.
However, I'm contributing to the American economy by having hired 24-7 shark handlers and focused light and radiation engineers.
The night shift guy is precisely 1/8th my size.8:37:  Muahahaha.
Muahahahah.  Muahahahahahahahahaha.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185834</id>
	<title>Re:Sweet! Free Stuff!</title>
	<author>Exitar</author>
	<datestamp>1266513900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, thank you "Please Rob Me", your wife is really hot! Now I will never have to meet her in a motel again thank to this wonderful service!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , thank you " Please Rob Me " , your wife is really hot !
Now I will never have to meet her in a motel again thank to this wonderful service !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, thank you "Please Rob Me", your wife is really hot!
Now I will never have to meet her in a motel again thank to this wonderful service!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186202</id>
	<title>Re:"How long until the first actual robbery"</title>
	<author>rubycodez</author>
	<datestamp>1266515400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>since January, robberies have been down a significant percent.  wonder if part of it is due to people actually being home during "working hours" because of joblessness or having to work "odd jobs" based from home?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>since January , robberies have been down a significant percent .
wonder if part of it is due to people actually being home during " working hours " because of joblessness or having to work " odd jobs " based from home ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>since January, robberies have been down a significant percent.
wonder if part of it is due to people actually being home during "working hours" because of joblessness or having to work "odd jobs" based from home?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31190484</id>
	<title>Re:Honeypot</title>
	<author>billybacs</author>
	<datestamp>1266486060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not entrapment if the opportunity exists; it's entrapment if the person commits a crime they would not have committed without interference from the cops.

I said this on another thread the other day:  a cop telling you to get into a car and drive off with it would be entrapment. A cop leaving a car unlocked in case any opportunist decides he wants an easy-to-steal car is that "honeypot". The person wasn't influenced by the cops to commit a crime.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not entrapment if the opportunity exists ; it 's entrapment if the person commits a crime they would not have committed without interference from the cops .
I said this on another thread the other day : a cop telling you to get into a car and drive off with it would be entrapment .
A cop leaving a car unlocked in case any opportunist decides he wants an easy-to-steal car is that " honeypot " .
The person was n't influenced by the cops to commit a crime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not entrapment if the opportunity exists; it's entrapment if the person commits a crime they would not have committed without interference from the cops.
I said this on another thread the other day:  a cop telling you to get into a car and drive off with it would be entrapment.
A cop leaving a car unlocked in case any opportunist decides he wants an easy-to-steal car is that "honeypot".
The person wasn't influenced by the cops to commit a crime.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184968</id>
	<title>Re:"How long until the first actual robbery"</title>
	<author>Lumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1266510780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which is why my facebook status is usually.....</p><p>"hunkered down bwehind sandbags in view of the door.  Itching to try out my new 10 gauge semiautomatic shotgun..."</p><p>or</p><p>" need to leave for supplies, I have claymore mines set up all over the house, I hope I dont trip one again when I come home and kill the new dog like last time."</p><p>For some reason I dont get any visitors... even from friends.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which is why my facebook status is usually..... " hunkered down bwehind sandbags in view of the door .
Itching to try out my new 10 gauge semiautomatic shotgun... " or " need to leave for supplies , I have claymore mines set up all over the house , I hope I dont trip one again when I come home and kill the new dog like last time .
" For some reason I dont get any visitors... even from friends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which is why my facebook status is usually....."hunkered down bwehind sandbags in view of the door.
Itching to try out my new 10 gauge semiautomatic shotgun..."or" need to leave for supplies, I have claymore mines set up all over the house, I hope I dont trip one again when I come home and kill the new dog like last time.
"For some reason I dont get any visitors... even from friends.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184616</id>
	<title>And when it happens</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266509400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There won't even be bones for their families to bury by the time the lawyers, both prosecutors and trial lawyers, are done with them for aiding and abetting this if the robber used their app.

This is so stupid that it would make running a mirror of The Pirate Bay in the middle of Hollywood look slightly intelligent by comparison.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There wo n't even be bones for their families to bury by the time the lawyers , both prosecutors and trial lawyers , are done with them for aiding and abetting this if the robber used their app .
This is so stupid that it would make running a mirror of The Pirate Bay in the middle of Hollywood look slightly intelligent by comparison .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There won't even be bones for their families to bury by the time the lawyers, both prosecutors and trial lawyers, are done with them for aiding and abetting this if the robber used their app.
This is so stupid that it would make running a mirror of The Pirate Bay in the middle of Hollywood look slightly intelligent by comparison.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185652</id>
	<title>Re:"How long until the first actual robbery"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266513180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No kiddin.g.</p><p>I work from home. Throughout the day I'm used to salespeople coming by and selling crap (water purifiers, auto glass, meat). I usually ignore them. Last year I heard the door bell ring. I didn't answer because I didn't know the person. I could see him through both the window and the remote viewer ("hidden" in the doorbell ringer assembly).  He calls out, "Hello, anyone home?"  After a couple minutes he starts trying to break into the garage door that's next to the front door.  The cops were happy for the video recording<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No kiddin.g.I work from home .
Throughout the day I 'm used to salespeople coming by and selling crap ( water purifiers , auto glass , meat ) .
I usually ignore them .
Last year I heard the door bell ring .
I did n't answer because I did n't know the person .
I could see him through both the window and the remote viewer ( " hidden " in the doorbell ringer assembly ) .
He calls out , " Hello , anyone home ?
" After a couple minutes he starts trying to break into the garage door that 's next to the front door .
The cops were happy for the video recording : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No kiddin.g.I work from home.
Throughout the day I'm used to salespeople coming by and selling crap (water purifiers, auto glass, meat).
I usually ignore them.
Last year I heard the door bell ring.
I didn't answer because I didn't know the person.
I could see him through both the window and the remote viewer ("hidden" in the doorbell ringer assembly).
He calls out, "Hello, anyone home?
"  After a couple minutes he starts trying to break into the garage door that's next to the front door.
The cops were happy for the video recording :D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184756</id>
	<title>Re:Everyone leaves their homes</title>
	<author>Critical Facilities</author>
	<datestamp>1266509880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars the leave.</p></div><p>Parent is spot on.  Any way you cut it,  if someone really wants to get into your house,  they're going to get in.  It's a balance of how difficult are you going to make it for someone else to know you're away and how hard it is to get into your house versus how badly that person wants to get into your house.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars the leave.Parent is spot on .
Any way you cut it , if someone really wants to get into your house , they 're going to get in .
It 's a balance of how difficult are you going to make it for someone else to know you 're away and how hard it is to get into your house versus how badly that person wants to get into your house .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars the leave.Parent is spot on.
Any way you cut it,  if someone really wants to get into your house,  they're going to get in.
It's a balance of how difficult are you going to make it for someone else to know you're away and how hard it is to get into your house versus how badly that person wants to get into your house.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186028</id>
	<title>Re:poor thieves</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266514620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And I can also imagine when said thieves level their house using high explosives. After all, there was nobody home, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I can also imagine when said thieves level their house using high explosives .
After all , there was nobody home , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I can also imagine when said thieves level their house using high explosives.
After all, there was nobody home, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185890</id>
	<title>Re:first web broadcast murder...</title>
	<author>uncledrax</author>
	<datestamp>1266514140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure. But you said it yourself, Legitimate self defense.</p><p>You cannot legally pay someone to break into your house (so you can lie in wait and shoot them).</p><p>If you say you're going on vacation, and someone breaks into your house, and you have legitimate cause to execute deadly force in your own defense ("legitimate" varies by state/local law), then yes.<br>If you webcam your entry way 24/7 in the offchance you get to shoot someone, so be it.. you probably open yourself up to get reamed by a Wrongful Death suit though; but there's reasonable cause for you to be in fear of your life and defend yourself with lethal force, you can probably get out of going to jail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure .
But you said it yourself , Legitimate self defense.You can not legally pay someone to break into your house ( so you can lie in wait and shoot them ) .If you say you 're going on vacation , and someone breaks into your house , and you have legitimate cause to execute deadly force in your own defense ( " legitimate " varies by state/local law ) , then yes.If you webcam your entry way 24/7 in the offchance you get to shoot someone , so be it.. you probably open yourself up to get reamed by a Wrongful Death suit though ; but there 's reasonable cause for you to be in fear of your life and defend yourself with lethal force , you can probably get out of going to jail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure.
But you said it yourself, Legitimate self defense.You cannot legally pay someone to break into your house (so you can lie in wait and shoot them).If you say you're going on vacation, and someone breaks into your house, and you have legitimate cause to execute deadly force in your own defense ("legitimate" varies by state/local law), then yes.If you webcam your entry way 24/7 in the offchance you get to shoot someone, so be it.. you probably open yourself up to get reamed by a Wrongful Death suit though; but there's reasonable cause for you to be in fear of your life and defend yourself with lethal force, you can probably get out of going to jail.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185450</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266512400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And which one is easier/less risky/more efficient for the robber?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And which one is easier/less risky/more efficient for the robber ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And which one is easier/less risky/more efficient for the robber?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31189918</id>
	<title>Re:Google maps+streetview mashup=SWEET</title>
	<author>Dalambertian</author>
	<datestamp>1266484680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Me too. What I really hate are all those morons going to coffee shops and "having a good time" with their dates. They are so smug, strutting about showing their real faces in public. Soon we'll have enough cameras and facial recognition to show these bastards who's boss. Match their faces with their home addresses and google maps and rob them blind. That'll teach em.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Me too .
What I really hate are all those morons going to coffee shops and " having a good time " with their dates .
They are so smug , strutting about showing their real faces in public .
Soon we 'll have enough cameras and facial recognition to show these bastards who 's boss .
Match their faces with their home addresses and google maps and rob them blind .
That 'll teach em .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Me too.
What I really hate are all those morons going to coffee shops and "having a good time" with their dates.
They are so smug, strutting about showing their real faces in public.
Soon we'll have enough cameras and facial recognition to show these bastards who's boss.
Match their faces with their home addresses and google maps and rob them blind.
That'll teach em.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31188092</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers</title>
	<author>sorak</author>
	<datestamp>1266522600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When one person is on vacation, the rest of the household is likely to be gone as well. to a cautious criminal, this is no substitute for a more through examination, but it would indicate which houses are best to examine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When one person is on vacation , the rest of the household is likely to be gone as well .
to a cautious criminal , this is no substitute for a more through examination , but it would indicate which houses are best to examine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When one person is on vacation, the rest of the household is likely to be gone as well.
to a cautious criminal, this is no substitute for a more through examination, but it would indicate which houses are best to examine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185068</id>
	<title>Re:first web broadcast murder...</title>
	<author>iamhassi</author>
	<datestamp>1266511140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Only if you post the URL to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. so we can watch</htmltext>
<tokenext>Only if you post the URL to / .
so we can watch</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only if you post the URL to /.
so we can watch</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184822</id>
	<title>Re:"How long until the first actual robbery"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266510120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What the hell? Did facebook invent robbery? It's pretty fuck-face clear that everyone works 8 hours every day, usually from around 7 in the morning until 3 in the afternoon and children go to school pretty much the same time. Which retarded individual would need a whole week/few days to clear out valuables? You do a quick in-and-out after carefully picking the secluded house with fancy garden and low security in a neighborhood where no one knows you! NOT based on that *one* of the residents in the house *might* be out of town for the day, amateurs!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What the hell ?
Did facebook invent robbery ?
It 's pretty fuck-face clear that everyone works 8 hours every day , usually from around 7 in the morning until 3 in the afternoon and children go to school pretty much the same time .
Which retarded individual would need a whole week/few days to clear out valuables ?
You do a quick in-and-out after carefully picking the secluded house with fancy garden and low security in a neighborhood where no one knows you !
NOT based on that * one * of the residents in the house * might * be out of town for the day , amateurs !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What the hell?
Did facebook invent robbery?
It's pretty fuck-face clear that everyone works 8 hours every day, usually from around 7 in the morning until 3 in the afternoon and children go to school pretty much the same time.
Which retarded individual would need a whole week/few days to clear out valuables?
You do a quick in-and-out after carefully picking the secluded house with fancy garden and low security in a neighborhood where no one knows you!
NOT based on that *one* of the residents in the house *might* be out of town for the day, amateurs!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31188178</id>
	<title>Re:Honeypot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266522960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shoulda put it in neutral and gave it a push.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shoulda put it in neutral and gave it a push .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shoulda put it in neutral and gave it a push.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184648</id>
	<title>HR Managers should stop smiling</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266509520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Basically, there's nothing wrong with the technology. The defect comes with the users. People are unreliable and untrustworthy. If people weren't such assholes I wouldn't mind letting everybody know my sexual habits, or even my fantasies. But there are spoilers out there; the type of people who say I have a bad attitude are also the same type of people who steal staple removers at the office and use "private" data for personal gain. The backstabbers are the people who smile a lot and are heavily into "family values" and "morality". I once heard a psychologist say that people in prison are more likely to be Conservative in there beliefs (by being pro-death penalty, pro-capital punishment and anti-crime) then people who are not in prison. Average, normal people tend to be irrational.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Basically , there 's nothing wrong with the technology .
The defect comes with the users .
People are unreliable and untrustworthy .
If people were n't such assholes I would n't mind letting everybody know my sexual habits , or even my fantasies .
But there are spoilers out there ; the type of people who say I have a bad attitude are also the same type of people who steal staple removers at the office and use " private " data for personal gain .
The backstabbers are the people who smile a lot and are heavily into " family values " and " morality " .
I once heard a psychologist say that people in prison are more likely to be Conservative in there beliefs ( by being pro-death penalty , pro-capital punishment and anti-crime ) then people who are not in prison .
Average , normal people tend to be irrational .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Basically, there's nothing wrong with the technology.
The defect comes with the users.
People are unreliable and untrustworthy.
If people weren't such assholes I wouldn't mind letting everybody know my sexual habits, or even my fantasies.
But there are spoilers out there; the type of people who say I have a bad attitude are also the same type of people who steal staple removers at the office and use "private" data for personal gain.
The backstabbers are the people who smile a lot and are heavily into "family values" and "morality".
I once heard a psychologist say that people in prison are more likely to be Conservative in there beliefs (by being pro-death penalty, pro-capital punishment and anti-crime) then people who are not in prison.
Average, normal people tend to be irrational.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185020</id>
	<title>Re:Honeypot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266511020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> I just wish the bait cars were full of explosives.</p><p>Honestly, Blow up a few car jackers or car thieves and make it REALLY public and suddenly car thefts will go way down.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just wish the bait cars were full of explosives.Honestly , Blow up a few car jackers or car thieves and make it REALLY public and suddenly car thefts will go way down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I just wish the bait cars were full of explosives.Honestly, Blow up a few car jackers or car thieves and make it REALLY public and suddenly car thefts will go way down.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184526</id>
	<title>should not take long</title>
	<author>onepoint</author>
	<datestamp>1266509100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>after the site get's<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. I figure about 6 hours we should be seeing reports LOL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>after the site get 's / .
I figure about 6 hours we should be seeing reports LOL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>after the site get's /.
I figure about 6 hours we should be seeing reports LOL</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31199554</id>
	<title>Re:Some problems and a solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266596520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>In fact, the site indexes people's locations. So I would guess that they could be robbed, an extension of knowing where they are, is that they may not be at home and burglary can be committed also. But since, people are not going to be burgled with no information of their home address indexed, I'd believe it's more likely they can be robbed and/or mugged as main goal of everyone knowing their current location.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In fact , the site indexes people 's locations .
So I would guess that they could be robbed , an extension of knowing where they are , is that they may not be at home and burglary can be committed also .
But since , people are not going to be burgled with no information of their home address indexed , I 'd believe it 's more likely they can be robbed and/or mugged as main goal of everyone knowing their current location .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In fact, the site indexes people's locations.
So I would guess that they could be robbed, an extension of knowing where they are, is that they may not be at home and burglary can be committed also.
But since, people are not going to be burgled with no information of their home address indexed, I'd believe it's more likely they can be robbed and/or mugged as main goal of everyone knowing their current location.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186102</id>
	<title>Re:Just because you can...</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1266514980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>We shouldn't have to hide our information, people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff.</p></div><p>
I think before people start respecting each other in society again, people need to start respecting themselves first. At least where I live (California), there seems to be a huge lack of self-respect and pride in folk today. It's embarrassing really.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We should n't have to hide our information , people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff .
I think before people start respecting each other in society again , people need to start respecting themselves first .
At least where I live ( California ) , there seems to be a huge lack of self-respect and pride in folk today .
It 's embarrassing really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We shouldn't have to hide our information, people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff.
I think before people start respecting each other in society again, people need to start respecting themselves first.
At least where I live (California), there seems to be a huge lack of self-respect and pride in folk today.
It's embarrassing really.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185394</id>
	<title>Re:Honeypot</title>
	<author>XxtraLarGe</author>
	<datestamp>1266512220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I just wish the bait cars were full of explosives. Honestly, Blow up a few car jackers or car thieves and make it REALLY public and suddenly car thefts will go way down.</p></div><p> Probably wouldn't work so well for innocent bystanders though.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just wish the bait cars were full of explosives .
Honestly , Blow up a few car jackers or car thieves and make it REALLY public and suddenly car thefts will go way down .
Probably would n't work so well for innocent bystanders though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just wish the bait cars were full of explosives.
Honestly, Blow up a few car jackers or car thieves and make it REALLY public and suddenly car thefts will go way down.
Probably wouldn't work so well for innocent bystanders though.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184502</id>
	<title>Release the lawyers..</title>
	<author>pak9rabid</author>
	<datestamp>1266508980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I sense some legal trouble for these guys in the near future..</htmltext>
<tokenext>I sense some legal trouble for these guys in the near future. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I sense some legal trouble for these guys in the near future..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184592</id>
	<title>I don't understand the value of this to robbers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266509340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The site doesn't tell you whether everyone in the household is gone, only if one person in the household is gone. A robber would still have to peek in the windows and do whatever it is robbers do to make sure the house is empty. But they could do that just by walking around some random neighbourhood and peeking in random windows; they don't need Twitter to tell them to peek into someone's windows.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The site does n't tell you whether everyone in the household is gone , only if one person in the household is gone .
A robber would still have to peek in the windows and do whatever it is robbers do to make sure the house is empty .
But they could do that just by walking around some random neighbourhood and peeking in random windows ; they do n't need Twitter to tell them to peek into someone 's windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The site doesn't tell you whether everyone in the household is gone, only if one person in the household is gone.
A robber would still have to peek in the windows and do whatever it is robbers do to make sure the house is empty.
But they could do that just by walking around some random neighbourhood and peeking in random windows; they don't need Twitter to tell them to peek into someone's windows.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184600</id>
	<title>You can question their methods...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266509400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>But if this raises awareness, full steam ahead. People need to figure out that if they have minute-by-minute updates of where they are and what they are doing, all of which is publically available, they will sooner or later have consequences.
<br> <br>
Moreso than robberies: I'm surprised we don't have rapes because of this, i.e. a girl tweeting while drunk.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But if this raises awareness , full steam ahead .
People need to figure out that if they have minute-by-minute updates of where they are and what they are doing , all of which is publically available , they will sooner or later have consequences .
Moreso than robberies : I 'm surprised we do n't have rapes because of this , i.e .
a girl tweeting while drunk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But if this raises awareness, full steam ahead.
People need to figure out that if they have minute-by-minute updates of where they are and what they are doing, all of which is publically available, they will sooner or later have consequences.
Moreso than robberies: I'm surprised we don't have rapes because of this, i.e.
a girl tweeting while drunk.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184952</id>
	<title>Re:Sweet! Free Stuff!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266510660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, thank you "Please Rob Me" \_his\_ LED TV really is awesome. Shouldn't have tweeted about the job you just did from the other side of town, dimwit. Expect a surprise when you get home...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , thank you " Please Rob Me " \ _his \ _ LED TV really is awesome .
Should n't have tweeted about the job you just did from the other side of town , dimwit .
Expect a surprise when you get home.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, thank you "Please Rob Me" \_his\_ LED TV really is awesome.
Shouldn't have tweeted about the job you just did from the other side of town, dimwit.
Expect a surprise when you get home...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31188144</id>
	<title>Re:Just because you can...</title>
	<author>gr8\_phk</author>
	<datestamp>1266522840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>We shouldn't have to hide our information, people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff.</p></div></blockquote><p>
We don't have to *hide* our information, but we should not broadcast it to the entire world either. You can tell your family and (hopefully) friends when you're going on vacation but you don't want to tell criminals that too. Face it, nobody outside the family and a few friends gives a shit when you're going away, so why do people feel the need to tell the whole world? Let's all post information that nobody but criminals really cares about.</p><blockquote><div><p>people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Nice idea, tell me when we get there. In the mean time, piece of iron went missing from my office - a relic from a past job, but someone else must have thought it looked interesting too. Yep, even the people you work with...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We should n't have to hide our information , people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff .
We do n't have to * hide * our information , but we should not broadcast it to the entire world either .
You can tell your family and ( hopefully ) friends when you 're going on vacation but you do n't want to tell criminals that too .
Face it , nobody outside the family and a few friends gives a shit when you 're going away , so why do people feel the need to tell the whole world ?
Let 's all post information that nobody but criminals really cares about.people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff .
Nice idea , tell me when we get there .
In the mean time , piece of iron went missing from my office - a relic from a past job , but someone else must have thought it looked interesting too .
Yep , even the people you work with.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We shouldn't have to hide our information, people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff.
We don't have to *hide* our information, but we should not broadcast it to the entire world either.
You can tell your family and (hopefully) friends when you're going on vacation but you don't want to tell criminals that too.
Face it, nobody outside the family and a few friends gives a shit when you're going away, so why do people feel the need to tell the whole world?
Let's all post information that nobody but criminals really cares about.people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff.
Nice idea, tell me when we get there.
In the mean time, piece of iron went missing from my office - a relic from a past job, but someone else must have thought it looked interesting too.
Yep, even the people you work with...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31187348</id>
	<title>Re:You can question their methods...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266520320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My twitter automatically updates that I'm taking a huge dump every two hours with my location at home<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D It even uploads a photo. And who says I take dumps in the bathroom?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My twitter automatically updates that I 'm taking a huge dump every two hours with my location at home : D It even uploads a photo .
And who says I take dumps in the bathroom ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My twitter automatically updates that I'm taking a huge dump every two hours with my location at home :D It even uploads a photo.
And who says I take dumps in the bathroom?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184600</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185516</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266512640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*knock knock*</p><p>Housemate opens door.  "Hello?"</p><p>"Good morning, sir, I'm with $CHARITY, and we're looking for donations.  Our truck will be coming through your neighborhood on $DATE, do you have anything to help the $NEEDY\_POPULATION?"</p><p>Housemate replies appropriately, burglar goes to the next house.</p><p>*knock knock*</p><p>Silence.</p><p>*window smash, goodbye valuables*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* knock knock * Housemate opens door .
" Hello ? " " Good morning , sir , I 'm with $ CHARITY , and we 're looking for donations .
Our truck will be coming through your neighborhood on $ DATE , do you have anything to help the $ NEEDY \ _POPULATION ?
" Housemate replies appropriately , burglar goes to the next house .
* knock knock * Silence .
* window smash , goodbye valuables *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*knock knock*Housemate opens door.
"Hello?""Good morning, sir, I'm with $CHARITY, and we're looking for donations.
Our truck will be coming through your neighborhood on $DATE, do you have anything to help the $NEEDY\_POPULATION?
"Housemate replies appropriately, burglar goes to the next house.
*knock knock*Silence.
*window smash, goodbye valuables*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186958</id>
	<title>Re:Just because you can...</title>
	<author>Otterley</author>
	<datestamp>1266518760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"endorsing the breaking of the law is also illegal"</p><p>It's not in the USA.  Inciting violence is, however.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" endorsing the breaking of the law is also illegal " It 's not in the USA .
Inciting violence is , however .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"endorsing the breaking of the law is also illegal"It's not in the USA.
Inciting violence is, however.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186456</id>
	<title>Re:Some problems and a solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266516360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Regarding location based reminders :</p><p>The OmniFocus iPhone app already does this</p><p>http://www.omnigroup.com/applications/omnifocus</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Regarding location based reminders : The OmniFocus iPhone app already does thishttp : //www.omnigroup.com/applications/omnifocus</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Regarding location based reminders :The OmniFocus iPhone app already does thishttp://www.omnigroup.com/applications/omnifocus</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31194198</id>
	<title>Re:Just because you can...</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1266503400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Not everyone is a crook and we should all strive to not be crooks, it is better for everyone. There used to be a time when everyone left there doors unlocked and trusted the community to not rob them. [...] We shouldn't have to hide our information, people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff.</p></div></blockquote><p>Yes, yes, pining for the Norman Rockwell version of the 1950's is fun but in reality, the probability of having something stolen from you has never been zero. Some percentage of your neighbors are willing to steal from you no matter where (or when) you live. The only thing that stands in their way is opportunity. If they are able to go in and take something with a very low chance of being spotted or caught, they're going to try it. The <b>rational</b> response of a property owner is to take reasonable steps to secure his or her things to reduce the opportunity for theft, even if they overall relative risk seems low. These are some things that a rational person does not (or should not) do if they care at all about their security <b>and</b> know the consequences of them:</p><p>* Go to the store and leave the garage door open<br>* Give out your personal details to anyone who asks<br>* Ask a stranger to hold your car keys<br>* Set an empty or easily-guessed root password<br>* Put your wallet down in a crowded area<br>* Broadcast your exact whereabouts on Twitter</p><p>If you do any of these things, don't act surprised at the consequences. Not that it would do any good anyway. The criminal has your data or property and you just look foolish for not protecting it. The problem here is that almost nobody using FourSquare understands the consequences of posting their exact physical location to the Internet at large because the media hasn't told them yet. Sometimes it takes a bold statement to get the media to pay attention to an underlying important message and it's hard to get any bolder than a site named pleaserobme.com. The site is just a pretty wrapper around something that's already available to criminals everywhere <a href="http://twitter.com/search?q=4sq\%20-\%40foursquare" title="twitter.com">through Twitter itself</a> [twitter.com]. (Does mentioning that fact make me an asshole as well?)</p><p>If this kind of thing is wrong, then where is the line drawn? If someone discovers a critical weakness in a popular encryption algorithm with too many vendors to enumerate let alone contact, is it wrong to describe it in public, even though criminals could make use of it to steal data? Doesn't everyone have the right to know that the security of their data is potentially in jeopardy? In forming my own answer, I'm reminded of the old security maxim: Sunlight is the best disinfectant.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not everyone is a crook and we should all strive to not be crooks , it is better for everyone .
There used to be a time when everyone left there doors unlocked and trusted the community to not rob them .
[ ... ] We should n't have to hide our information , people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff.Yes , yes , pining for the Norman Rockwell version of the 1950 's is fun but in reality , the probability of having something stolen from you has never been zero .
Some percentage of your neighbors are willing to steal from you no matter where ( or when ) you live .
The only thing that stands in their way is opportunity .
If they are able to go in and take something with a very low chance of being spotted or caught , they 're going to try it .
The rational response of a property owner is to take reasonable steps to secure his or her things to reduce the opportunity for theft , even if they overall relative risk seems low .
These are some things that a rational person does not ( or should not ) do if they care at all about their security and know the consequences of them : * Go to the store and leave the garage door open * Give out your personal details to anyone who asks * Ask a stranger to hold your car keys * Set an empty or easily-guessed root password * Put your wallet down in a crowded area * Broadcast your exact whereabouts on TwitterIf you do any of these things , do n't act surprised at the consequences .
Not that it would do any good anyway .
The criminal has your data or property and you just look foolish for not protecting it .
The problem here is that almost nobody using FourSquare understands the consequences of posting their exact physical location to the Internet at large because the media has n't told them yet .
Sometimes it takes a bold statement to get the media to pay attention to an underlying important message and it 's hard to get any bolder than a site named pleaserobme.com .
The site is just a pretty wrapper around something that 's already available to criminals everywhere through Twitter itself [ twitter.com ] .
( Does mentioning that fact make me an asshole as well ?
) If this kind of thing is wrong , then where is the line drawn ?
If someone discovers a critical weakness in a popular encryption algorithm with too many vendors to enumerate let alone contact , is it wrong to describe it in public , even though criminals could make use of it to steal data ?
Does n't everyone have the right to know that the security of their data is potentially in jeopardy ?
In forming my own answer , I 'm reminded of the old security maxim : Sunlight is the best disinfectant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not everyone is a crook and we should all strive to not be crooks, it is better for everyone.
There used to be a time when everyone left there doors unlocked and trusted the community to not rob them.
[...] We shouldn't have to hide our information, people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff.Yes, yes, pining for the Norman Rockwell version of the 1950's is fun but in reality, the probability of having something stolen from you has never been zero.
Some percentage of your neighbors are willing to steal from you no matter where (or when) you live.
The only thing that stands in their way is opportunity.
If they are able to go in and take something with a very low chance of being spotted or caught, they're going to try it.
The rational response of a property owner is to take reasonable steps to secure his or her things to reduce the opportunity for theft, even if they overall relative risk seems low.
These are some things that a rational person does not (or should not) do if they care at all about their security and know the consequences of them:* Go to the store and leave the garage door open* Give out your personal details to anyone who asks* Ask a stranger to hold your car keys* Set an empty or easily-guessed root password* Put your wallet down in a crowded area* Broadcast your exact whereabouts on TwitterIf you do any of these things, don't act surprised at the consequences.
Not that it would do any good anyway.
The criminal has your data or property and you just look foolish for not protecting it.
The problem here is that almost nobody using FourSquare understands the consequences of posting their exact physical location to the Internet at large because the media hasn't told them yet.
Sometimes it takes a bold statement to get the media to pay attention to an underlying important message and it's hard to get any bolder than a site named pleaserobme.com.
The site is just a pretty wrapper around something that's already available to criminals everywhere through Twitter itself [twitter.com].
(Does mentioning that fact make me an asshole as well?
)If this kind of thing is wrong, then where is the line drawn?
If someone discovers a critical weakness in a popular encryption algorithm with too many vendors to enumerate let alone contact, is it wrong to describe it in public, even though criminals could make use of it to steal data?
Doesn't everyone have the right to know that the security of their data is potentially in jeopardy?
In forming my own answer, I'm reminded of the old security maxim: Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31193620</id>
	<title>Turn it back the other way</title>
	<author>LukeWebber</author>
	<datestamp>1266499560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Instead of robbing them, go to where they are right now and give 'em a good, hard slap.<br>Oh, OK. You can rob them first. But they won't learn anything either way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Instead of robbing them , go to where they are right now and give 'em a good , hard slap.Oh , OK. You can rob them first .
But they wo n't learn anything either way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Instead of robbing them, go to where they are right now and give 'em a good, hard slap.Oh, OK. You can rob them first.
But they won't learn anything either way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185052</id>
	<title>Re:"How long until the first actual robbery"</title>
	<author>Deadplant</author>
	<datestamp>1266511140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>oh henny-penny the sky is falling!<br>Half the bloody country clears out of their houses for 8 hours every weekday.<br>There is no shortage of empty houses to rob.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>oh henny-penny the sky is falling ! Half the bloody country clears out of their houses for 8 hours every weekday.There is no shortage of empty houses to rob .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>oh henny-penny the sky is falling!Half the bloody country clears out of their houses for 8 hours every weekday.There is no shortage of empty houses to rob.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186932</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1266518580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The site doesn't tell you whether everyone in the household is gone, only if one person in the household is gone. A robber would still have to peek in the windows and do whatever it is robbers do to make sure the house is empty. But they could do that just by walking around some random neighbourhood and peeking in random windows</p></div></blockquote><p>You miss the point.  A thief wandering a random neighborhood peeking in random windows is rolling the dice hoping for a natural 100.  A thief using tweets, status updates, etc... is using loaded dice.  He has a much higher chance of rolling a 'natural' 100.<br>
&nbsp; </p><blockquote><div><p>they don't need Twitter to tell them to peek into someone's windows.</p></div></blockquote><p>No, they don't 'need' Twitter.  Nor do I 'need' to use Google to look up what I could find by getting in my car, driving down to the library, and then poring through the indexes of half a dozen books after using the card catalog to locate those books.<br>
&nbsp; <br>But Twitter and Google make both of our lives a hell of a lot easier.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The site does n't tell you whether everyone in the household is gone , only if one person in the household is gone .
A robber would still have to peek in the windows and do whatever it is robbers do to make sure the house is empty .
But they could do that just by walking around some random neighbourhood and peeking in random windowsYou miss the point .
A thief wandering a random neighborhood peeking in random windows is rolling the dice hoping for a natural 100 .
A thief using tweets , status updates , etc... is using loaded dice .
He has a much higher chance of rolling a 'natural ' 100 .
  they do n't need Twitter to tell them to peek into someone 's windows.No , they do n't 'need ' Twitter .
Nor do I 'need ' to use Google to look up what I could find by getting in my car , driving down to the library , and then poring through the indexes of half a dozen books after using the card catalog to locate those books .
  But Twitter and Google make both of our lives a hell of a lot easier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The site doesn't tell you whether everyone in the household is gone, only if one person in the household is gone.
A robber would still have to peek in the windows and do whatever it is robbers do to make sure the house is empty.
But they could do that just by walking around some random neighbourhood and peeking in random windowsYou miss the point.
A thief wandering a random neighborhood peeking in random windows is rolling the dice hoping for a natural 100.
A thief using tweets, status updates, etc... is using loaded dice.
He has a much higher chance of rolling a 'natural' 100.
  they don't need Twitter to tell them to peek into someone's windows.No, they don't 'need' Twitter.
Nor do I 'need' to use Google to look up what I could find by getting in my car, driving down to the library, and then poring through the indexes of half a dozen books after using the card catalog to locate those books.
  But Twitter and Google make both of our lives a hell of a lot easier.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534</id>
	<title>Everyone leaves their homes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266509100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, physical security, you're away from your home. So are a vast majority of people from between the hours of 9AM to 3PM every day. There's been a lot of backlash over this site, including Twitter suspending their account, which is just silly. It's the same level of surveillance that someone can do by just parking in front of your home. It's just that now they can see you over FourSquare (speaking of silly...). It's the same as posting on Twitter that you're stuck in traffic, or sending an email from a work-only address. Just another in a very, very long list of ways to see where you're currently at.</p><p>Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars the leave.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , physical security , you 're away from your home .
So are a vast majority of people from between the hours of 9AM to 3PM every day .
There 's been a lot of backlash over this site , including Twitter suspending their account , which is just silly .
It 's the same level of surveillance that someone can do by just parking in front of your home .
It 's just that now they can see you over FourSquare ( speaking of silly... ) .
It 's the same as posting on Twitter that you 're stuck in traffic , or sending an email from a work-only address .
Just another in a very , very long list of ways to see where you 're currently at.Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars the leave .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, physical security, you're away from your home.
So are a vast majority of people from between the hours of 9AM to 3PM every day.
There's been a lot of backlash over this site, including Twitter suspending their account, which is just silly.
It's the same level of surveillance that someone can do by just parking in front of your home.
It's just that now they can see you over FourSquare (speaking of silly...).
It's the same as posting on Twitter that you're stuck in traffic, or sending an email from a work-only address.
Just another in a very, very long list of ways to see where you're currently at.Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars the leave.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184498</id>
	<title>Sweet! Free Stuff!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266508980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thank you Please Rob Me! My new LED TV is awesome!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you Please Rob Me !
My new LED TV is awesome !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you Please Rob Me!
My new LED TV is awesome!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185242</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers</title>
	<author>99BottlesOfBeerInMyF</author>
	<datestamp>1266511800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The site doesn't tell you whether everyone in the household is gone, only if one person in the household is gone. A robber would still have to peek in the windows and do whatever it is robbers do to make sure the house is empty.</p></div><p>Maybe you're picturing robbers as guys dressed in black, wearing masks, twirling their mustaches, and carrying big sacks as a profession. Many times robbers are friends or acquaintances. They know who lives in your house and if they can check both your locations via twitter, they know they have a good shot at your house. A lot of robberies are done by people the victim has met who are opportunists. Heck, statistically, walking down the same jogging path as a burglar increases your chances of being burgled.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The site does n't tell you whether everyone in the household is gone , only if one person in the household is gone .
A robber would still have to peek in the windows and do whatever it is robbers do to make sure the house is empty.Maybe you 're picturing robbers as guys dressed in black , wearing masks , twirling their mustaches , and carrying big sacks as a profession .
Many times robbers are friends or acquaintances .
They know who lives in your house and if they can check both your locations via twitter , they know they have a good shot at your house .
A lot of robberies are done by people the victim has met who are opportunists .
Heck , statistically , walking down the same jogging path as a burglar increases your chances of being burgled .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The site doesn't tell you whether everyone in the household is gone, only if one person in the household is gone.
A robber would still have to peek in the windows and do whatever it is robbers do to make sure the house is empty.Maybe you're picturing robbers as guys dressed in black, wearing masks, twirling their mustaches, and carrying big sacks as a profession.
Many times robbers are friends or acquaintances.
They know who lives in your house and if they can check both your locations via twitter, they know they have a good shot at your house.
A lot of robberies are done by people the victim has met who are opportunists.
Heck, statistically, walking down the same jogging path as a burglar increases your chances of being burgled.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185758</id>
	<title>Re:"How long until the first actual robbery"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266513540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm.  My new Facebook status: </p><p>"New shotgun looks and shoots great, really rounds out collection.  Staying home this week since winning another martial arts championship.  The new Rotweiler gets along great with the Dobermans."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm .
My new Facebook status : " New shotgun looks and shoots great , really rounds out collection .
Staying home this week since winning another martial arts championship .
The new Rotweiler gets along great with the Dobermans .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm.
My new Facebook status: "New shotgun looks and shoots great, really rounds out collection.
Staying home this week since winning another martial arts championship.
The new Rotweiler gets along great with the Dobermans.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184866</id>
	<title>Fortunately for me</title>
	<author>XxtraLarGe</author>
	<datestamp>1266510300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I always set bear traps in my house when I'm out of town. Take that, PleaseRobMe.com!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I always set bear traps in my house when I 'm out of town .
Take that , PleaseRobMe.com !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always set bear traps in my house when I'm out of town.
Take that, PleaseRobMe.com!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185088</id>
	<title>Re:Fortunately for me</title>
	<author>iamhassi</author>
	<datestamp>1266511260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That doesn't sound.... oh I thought you said beer traps, my bad</htmltext>
<tokenext>That does n't sound.... oh I thought you said beer traps , my bad</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That doesn't sound.... oh I thought you said beer traps, my bad</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184510</id>
	<title>I for one...</title>
	<author>Mashdar</author>
	<datestamp>1266508980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>welcome our new squatter neighbors.</htmltext>
<tokenext>welcome our new squatter neighbors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>welcome our new squatter neighbors.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185146</id>
	<title>You flatter yoursleves</title>
	<author>Trivial Solutions</author>
	<datestamp>1266511380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's money to be made scaring grandma, isn't there?  I die laughing at people who worry about their secrets.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's money to be made scaring grandma , is n't there ?
I die laughing at people who worry about their secrets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's money to be made scaring grandma, isn't there?
I die laughing at people who worry about their secrets.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185868</id>
	<title>Robbery? or burglury!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266514020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Robbery, by definition, means the victim is present, as in, the robber steals from the victim. If you are away, your house may get burgled, but not robbed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Robbery , by definition , means the victim is present , as in , the robber steals from the victim .
If you are away , your house may get burgled , but not robbed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Robbery, by definition, means the victim is present, as in, the robber steals from the victim.
If you are away, your house may get burgled, but not robbed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185136</id>
	<title>No need for this tool</title>
	<author>warrior\_s</author>
	<datestamp>1266511320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A little bit of common sense can go long way.. most of the people are not in their house during day-time.. umm when they leave their house for work.. <br>
i don't think posting that you are out of your home for few hours is going to make much difference... the robbers have to make sure that your neighbors are also  not at their home<br>
may be we can go one step ahead and make a website that does that too.. <br> <br>in addition to XXX, three of their neighbors have also left their house</htmltext>
<tokenext>A little bit of common sense can go long way.. most of the people are not in their house during day-time.. umm when they leave their house for work. . i do n't think posting that you are out of your home for few hours is going to make much difference... the robbers have to make sure that your neighbors are also not at their home may be we can go one step ahead and make a website that does that too.. in addition to XXX , three of their neighbors have also left their house</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A little bit of common sense can go long way.. most of the people are not in their house during day-time.. umm when they leave their house for work.. 
i don't think posting that you are out of your home for few hours is going to make much difference... the robbers have to make sure that your neighbors are also  not at their home
may be we can go one step ahead and make a website that does that too..  in addition to XXX, three of their neighbors have also left their house</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186898</id>
	<title>Re:"How long until the first actual robbery"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266518400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Brazil the robbers don't care if you are home or not. They break in whenever they can, and if there is people inside, too bad for the people inside.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Brazil the robbers do n't care if you are home or not .
They break in whenever they can , and if there is people inside , too bad for the people inside .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Brazil the robbers don't care if you are home or not.
They break in whenever they can, and if there is people inside, too bad for the people inside.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31187890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186294
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31187356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31188144
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185714
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31189918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31187344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31191072
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31188178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31190284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31188028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31191558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185132
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186578
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31189160
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31190484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31187348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31188904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31199554
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186456
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31187754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31194198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184936
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31197004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31188092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31192318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31188278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186270
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186898
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185364
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_18_1340202_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31189160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185086
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184952
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185760
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31189918
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31188028
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184612
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185644
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31187344
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31199554
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186456
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31187754
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185900
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185898
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31188092
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186932
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31187890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185132
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185242
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185364
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185890
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184664
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185020
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31188278
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185784
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31188178
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31190484
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186638
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185394
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185428
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185136
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184696
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185868
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185100
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185528
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185088
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185630
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184656
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186578
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186270
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185278
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186294
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31197004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184756
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31188904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185960
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184740
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186202
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184568
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31191558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186898
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184822
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186080
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185758
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184958
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186488
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185992
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31192318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184690
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185844
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185212
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31187356
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185714
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184616
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184566
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184770
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185896
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31188144
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185544
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31186102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31190284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31194198
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_18_1340202.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31184600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31187348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31185584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_18_1340202.31191072
</commentlist>
</conversation>
