<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_16_1656200</id>
	<title>Aussie Attorney General Says Gamers Are Scarier Than Biker Gangs</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1266345060000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Sasayaki writes <i>"South Australian Attorney-General Michael Atkinson claims, in an interview with Good Game, that <a href="http://www.news.com.au/technology/gamers-scarier-than-bikies-says-michael-atkinson/story-e6frfro0-1225830886493">gamers were more of a threat to his family than biker gangs</a>. This is the man who has been the biggest opponent to Australia receiving an R18+ rating for video games and who has the power to veto any such law introducing it."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sasayaki writes " South Australian Attorney-General Michael Atkinson claims , in an interview with Good Game , that gamers were more of a threat to his family than biker gangs .
This is the man who has been the biggest opponent to Australia receiving an R18 + rating for video games and who has the power to veto any such law introducing it .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sasayaki writes "South Australian Attorney-General Michael Atkinson claims, in an interview with Good Game, that gamers were more of a threat to his family than biker gangs.
This is the man who has been the biggest opponent to Australia receiving an R18+ rating for video games and who has the power to veto any such law introducing it.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162792</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>oakgrove</author>
	<datestamp>1266327600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Put yourself in the same situation. What would you consider a more present threat to your safety -- a set of organizations who is opposing you politically (the biker gangs are putting forward their own candidate to run against him), or a set of individuals, one of which has made a threat, in writing, at your home?</p></div><p>Hmmm... Probably the person that actually left the threatening note.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Put yourself in the same situation .
What would you consider a more present threat to your safety -- a set of organizations who is opposing you politically ( the biker gangs are putting forward their own candidate to run against him ) , or a set of individuals , one of which has made a threat , in writing , at your home ? Hmmm... Probably the person that actually left the threatening note .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Put yourself in the same situation.
What would you consider a more present threat to your safety -- a set of organizations who is opposing you politically (the biker gangs are putting forward their own candidate to run against him), or a set of individuals, one of which has made a threat, in writing, at your home?Hmmm... Probably the person that actually left the threatening note.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158424</id>
	<title>What a tit</title>
	<author>Attaturk</author>
	<datestamp>1266349980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not sure whether my biker self or my gamer self is more offended by this arsehat.  I've met and hung out with dozens of "biker gangs" at various rallies - yes including the patch clubs that people refer to here like they're comprised of mindless hooligans - and felt safer in their company than when taking a trip through a town centre on a Friday or Saturday night.<br> <br>
In short, "biker gang" is not shorthand for dangerous thug.  Nor is "gamer" shorthand for brainwashed serial killer.  And while we're at it I'm pretty sure that "Australian politician" doesn't mean paranoid, misinformed and dangerously ignorant jerk"... but I could be wrong.<br> <br>Just a thought Mr Atkinson but perhaps your ill-considered bigotry is what causes people to take such a dim view of you.  A single gamer harrassing you is more likely indicative that you've pissed someone off personally than that all gamers are out to get you and your family.  Gah.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure whether my biker self or my gamer self is more offended by this arsehat .
I 've met and hung out with dozens of " biker gangs " at various rallies - yes including the patch clubs that people refer to here like they 're comprised of mindless hooligans - and felt safer in their company than when taking a trip through a town centre on a Friday or Saturday night .
In short , " biker gang " is not shorthand for dangerous thug .
Nor is " gamer " shorthand for brainwashed serial killer .
And while we 're at it I 'm pretty sure that " Australian politician " does n't mean paranoid , misinformed and dangerously ignorant jerk " ... but I could be wrong .
Just a thought Mr Atkinson but perhaps your ill-considered bigotry is what causes people to take such a dim view of you .
A single gamer harrassing you is more likely indicative that you 've pissed someone off personally than that all gamers are out to get you and your family .
Gah .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure whether my biker self or my gamer self is more offended by this arsehat.
I've met and hung out with dozens of "biker gangs" at various rallies - yes including the patch clubs that people refer to here like they're comprised of mindless hooligans - and felt safer in their company than when taking a trip through a town centre on a Friday or Saturday night.
In short, "biker gang" is not shorthand for dangerous thug.
Nor is "gamer" shorthand for brainwashed serial killer.
And while we're at it I'm pretty sure that "Australian politician" doesn't mean paranoid, misinformed and dangerously ignorant jerk"... but I could be wrong.
Just a thought Mr Atkinson but perhaps your ill-considered bigotry is what causes people to take such a dim view of you.
A single gamer harrassing you is more likely indicative that you've pissed someone off personally than that all gamers are out to get you and your family.
Gah.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161450</id>
	<title>Re:The guy's right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266320340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>this guy thinks that gamers are generally more dangerous than bikers in order to discredit him. </i> </p><p>Quote:</p><blockquote><div><p>"I feel that my family and I are more at risk from gamers than we are from the outlaw motorcycle gangs who also hate me and are running a candidate against me"</p></div></blockquote><p>He didn't say "from <b>a</b> gamer" he said "from gamers", as in the whole group.  As opposed to the outlaw motorcycle gangs, as in their whole group.  He feels that gamers are more dangerous than bikers.  If he's never received a death threat from anyone but a gamer, then perhaps he's justified in feeling that way, but I'm seriously surprised that this is the first death threat an AG would get.</p><p>I do have to say that the motorcycle gangs have a better long term plan than the gamers do at this point.  Someone should start a gamer party and run for election on the grounds that you actually know something about what you're trying to regulate.</p></div><p>They have...</p><p>It's called The Pirate Party.</p><p>Get out and VOTE!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>this guy thinks that gamers are generally more dangerous than bikers in order to discredit him .
Quote : " I feel that my family and I are more at risk from gamers than we are from the outlaw motorcycle gangs who also hate me and are running a candidate against me " He did n't say " from a gamer " he said " from gamers " , as in the whole group .
As opposed to the outlaw motorcycle gangs , as in their whole group .
He feels that gamers are more dangerous than bikers .
If he 's never received a death threat from anyone but a gamer , then perhaps he 's justified in feeling that way , but I 'm seriously surprised that this is the first death threat an AG would get.I do have to say that the motorcycle gangs have a better long term plan than the gamers do at this point .
Someone should start a gamer party and run for election on the grounds that you actually know something about what you 're trying to regulate.They have...It 's called The Pirate Party.Get out and VOTE !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> this guy thinks that gamers are generally more dangerous than bikers in order to discredit him.
Quote:"I feel that my family and I are more at risk from gamers than we are from the outlaw motorcycle gangs who also hate me and are running a candidate against me"He didn't say "from a gamer" he said "from gamers", as in the whole group.
As opposed to the outlaw motorcycle gangs, as in their whole group.
He feels that gamers are more dangerous than bikers.
If he's never received a death threat from anyone but a gamer, then perhaps he's justified in feeling that way, but I'm seriously surprised that this is the first death threat an AG would get.I do have to say that the motorcycle gangs have a better long term plan than the gamers do at this point.
Someone should start a gamer party and run for election on the grounds that you actually know something about what you're trying to regulate.They have...It's called The Pirate Party.Get out and VOTE!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160144</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>ctsupafly</author>
	<datestamp>1266314460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Condemning the whole over the acts of an individual is short sighted &amp; stupid.  ONE person left him a note, so therefore, to him, all gamers are more dangerous than bikers.  Sounds like just another elected idiot to me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Condemning the whole over the acts of an individual is short sighted &amp; stupid .
ONE person left him a note , so therefore , to him , all gamers are more dangerous than bikers .
Sounds like just another elected idiot to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Condemning the whole over the acts of an individual is short sighted &amp; stupid.
ONE person left him a note, so therefore, to him, all gamers are more dangerous than bikers.
Sounds like just another elected idiot to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160242</id>
	<title>Hey, we got some of them in Amsterdam</title>
	<author>SmallFurryCreature</author>
	<datestamp>1266314820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Me and some gamer mates are going to beat up the Amsterdam chapter of the Hell's Angels. I mean, we are thougher then them right? What could possibly go wrong? They are wusses and I will make sure to tell them loudly and clearly, what are they going to do? None of them has scored as many kills in Counterstrike as I have.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Me and some gamer mates are going to beat up the Amsterdam chapter of the Hell 's Angels .
I mean , we are thougher then them right ?
What could possibly go wrong ?
They are wusses and I will make sure to tell them loudly and clearly , what are they going to do ?
None of them has scored as many kills in Counterstrike as I have .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Me and some gamer mates are going to beat up the Amsterdam chapter of the Hell's Angels.
I mean, we are thougher then them right?
What could possibly go wrong?
They are wusses and I will make sure to tell them loudly and clearly, what are they going to do?
None of them has scored as many kills in Counterstrike as I have.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554</id>
	<title>Re:The guy's right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266350520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>this guy thinks that gamers are generally more dangerous than bikers in order to discredit him. </i></p><p>Quote:</p><blockquote><div><p>"I feel that my family and I are more at risk from gamers than we are from the outlaw motorcycle gangs who also hate me and are running a candidate against me"</p></div></blockquote><p>He didn't say "from <b>a</b> gamer" he said "from gamers", as in the whole group.  As opposed to the outlaw motorcycle gangs, as in their whole group.  He feels that gamers are more dangerous than bikers.  If he's never received a death threat from anyone but a gamer, then perhaps he's justified in feeling that way, but I'm seriously surprised that this is the first death threat an AG would get.</p><p>I do have to say that the motorcycle gangs have a better long term plan than the gamers do at this point.  Someone should start a gamer party and run for election on the grounds that you actually know something about what you're trying to regulate.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>this guy thinks that gamers are generally more dangerous than bikers in order to discredit him .
Quote : " I feel that my family and I are more at risk from gamers than we are from the outlaw motorcycle gangs who also hate me and are running a candidate against me " He did n't say " from a gamer " he said " from gamers " , as in the whole group .
As opposed to the outlaw motorcycle gangs , as in their whole group .
He feels that gamers are more dangerous than bikers .
If he 's never received a death threat from anyone but a gamer , then perhaps he 's justified in feeling that way , but I 'm seriously surprised that this is the first death threat an AG would get.I do have to say that the motorcycle gangs have a better long term plan than the gamers do at this point .
Someone should start a gamer party and run for election on the grounds that you actually know something about what you 're trying to regulate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this guy thinks that gamers are generally more dangerous than bikers in order to discredit him.
Quote:"I feel that my family and I are more at risk from gamers than we are from the outlaw motorcycle gangs who also hate me and are running a candidate against me"He didn't say "from a gamer" he said "from gamers", as in the whole group.
As opposed to the outlaw motorcycle gangs, as in their whole group.
He feels that gamers are more dangerous than bikers.
If he's never received a death threat from anyone but a gamer, then perhaps he's justified in feeling that way, but I'm seriously surprised that this is the first death threat an AG would get.I do have to say that the motorcycle gangs have a better long term plan than the gamers do at this point.
Someone should start a gamer party and run for election on the grounds that you actually know something about what you're trying to regulate.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163954</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266336060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>And whilst his afraid of some angsty gamer leaving notes under his bloody welcome mat us bikies fund his rivals and their activities and pull strings with his allies as we edge closer to elections. If he was in his right mind some angry teenager would be the last of his problems.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And whilst his afraid of some angsty gamer leaving notes under his bloody welcome mat us bikies fund his rivals and their activities and pull strings with his allies as we edge closer to elections .
If he was in his right mind some angry teenager would be the last of his problems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And whilst his afraid of some angsty gamer leaving notes under his bloody welcome mat us bikies fund his rivals and their activities and pull strings with his allies as we edge closer to elections.
If he was in his right mind some angry teenager would be the last of his problems.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158418</id>
	<title>ok...</title>
	<author>kaoshin</author>
	<datestamp>1266349980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>"He was later forced to apologise. The animal was not a cat, the incident happened at another location and bikies weren't involved."
<br> <br>
This bloke is a dill mates.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" He was later forced to apologise .
The animal was not a cat , the incident happened at another location and bikies were n't involved .
" This bloke is a dill mates .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"He was later forced to apologise.
The animal was not a cat, the incident happened at another location and bikies weren't involved.
"
 
This bloke is a dill mates.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158644</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>rale, the</author>
	<datestamp>1266350820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article also mentions that in his scuffle with the bikers, he claimed they had BBQ'd and eaten a cat.  Then was forced to admit he made it up.  Why would you give him any credibility with regards to this supposed threat he received, when he has lied about his opposition in the past?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article also mentions that in his scuffle with the bikers , he claimed they had BBQ 'd and eaten a cat .
Then was forced to admit he made it up .
Why would you give him any credibility with regards to this supposed threat he received , when he has lied about his opposition in the past ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article also mentions that in his scuffle with the bikers, he claimed they had BBQ'd and eaten a cat.
Then was forced to admit he made it up.
Why would you give him any credibility with regards to this supposed threat he received, when he has lied about his opposition in the past?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158408</id>
	<title>WTF?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266349920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Aren't all Australians compelled by law to watch <i>Mad Max</i>? Surely that should provide suitable education on the dangers of biker gangs...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are n't all Australians compelled by law to watch Mad Max ?
Surely that should provide suitable education on the dangers of biker gangs.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aren't all Australians compelled by law to watch Mad Max?
Surely that should provide suitable education on the dangers of biker gangs...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158270</id>
	<title>The guy's right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266349380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I expect all Slashdot verbally abusing this guy for being a neocon and an enemy of freedom and a paranoid lunatic but the fact is this guy actually got threatened. This means that somebody has tried to intimidate him and state that he will hurt him/his family. Since no biker gangs have done this but a gamer did(you can never tell how dangerous these people are) he is absolutely right that gamers are scarier to him than biker gangs.</p><p>Then comes the internet and blows this totally out proportion and saying that this guy thinks that gamers are generally more dangerous than bikers in order to discredit him. I find that incredibly lame and it reeks of an attack campaign against the Australian Attorney General.</p><p>Good job loser(s), you just ruined your credibility. In the meantime this guy has got some arrows on his bow to fire at gamers. Congratulations again, you just helped your opponent by giving him media attention.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I expect all Slashdot verbally abusing this guy for being a neocon and an enemy of freedom and a paranoid lunatic but the fact is this guy actually got threatened .
This means that somebody has tried to intimidate him and state that he will hurt him/his family .
Since no biker gangs have done this but a gamer did ( you can never tell how dangerous these people are ) he is absolutely right that gamers are scarier to him than biker gangs.Then comes the internet and blows this totally out proportion and saying that this guy thinks that gamers are generally more dangerous than bikers in order to discredit him .
I find that incredibly lame and it reeks of an attack campaign against the Australian Attorney General.Good job loser ( s ) , you just ruined your credibility .
In the meantime this guy has got some arrows on his bow to fire at gamers .
Congratulations again , you just helped your opponent by giving him media attention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I expect all Slashdot verbally abusing this guy for being a neocon and an enemy of freedom and a paranoid lunatic but the fact is this guy actually got threatened.
This means that somebody has tried to intimidate him and state that he will hurt him/his family.
Since no biker gangs have done this but a gamer did(you can never tell how dangerous these people are) he is absolutely right that gamers are scarier to him than biker gangs.Then comes the internet and blows this totally out proportion and saying that this guy thinks that gamers are generally more dangerous than bikers in order to discredit him.
I find that incredibly lame and it reeks of an attack campaign against the Australian Attorney General.Good job loser(s), you just ruined your credibility.
In the meantime this guy has got some arrows on his bow to fire at gamers.
Congratulations again, you just helped your opponent by giving him media attention.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31166776</id>
	<title>Re:Well, i guess so...</title>
	<author>aLEczapKA</author>
	<datestamp>1265021160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What an idiot<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. I wonder what a member of Hells Angels would do if he tried to ban the motorbikes in Australia??</p><p>just lol... besides he's politician... I don't believe any of it</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What an idiot .. I wonder what a member of Hells Angels would do if he tried to ban the motorbikes in Australia ?
? just lol... besides he 's politician... I do n't believe any of it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What an idiot .. I wonder what a member of Hells Angels would do if he tried to ban the motorbikes in Australia?
?just lol... besides he's politician... I don't believe any of it</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158320</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>guruevi</author>
	<datestamp>1266349560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He's a politician. What do you expect - he's probably both?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's a politician .
What do you expect - he 's probably both ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's a politician.
What do you expect - he's probably both?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158284</id>
	<title>now now now...</title>
	<author>Moheeheeko</author>
	<datestamp>1266349440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>..there has been many a victim of a gamers....getting up, wheezing, using his inhaler and then starting a hate thread on 4chan.</htmltext>
<tokenext>..there has been many a victim of a gamers....getting up , wheezing , using his inhaler and then starting a hate thread on 4chan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..there has been many a victim of a gamers....getting up, wheezing, using his inhaler and then starting a hate thread on 4chan.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159182</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>Mister Whirly</author>
	<datestamp>1266353220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would be afraid of the ones who will do more than make idle threats - the bikers. They don't usually make vague anonymous threats. They wont warn you what they are going to do, someday you will just wake up dead. An anonymous note slipped under your door? Probably a 13 year old who left it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would be afraid of the ones who will do more than make idle threats - the bikers .
They do n't usually make vague anonymous threats .
They wont warn you what they are going to do , someday you will just wake up dead .
An anonymous note slipped under your door ?
Probably a 13 year old who left it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would be afraid of the ones who will do more than make idle threats - the bikers.
They don't usually make vague anonymous threats.
They wont warn you what they are going to do, someday you will just wake up dead.
An anonymous note slipped under your door?
Probably a 13 year old who left it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159436</id>
	<title>Re:Aussie Jack Thompson?</title>
	<author>Bakkster</author>
	<datestamp>1266311340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Apparently, it's ok to generalize based on traits that are chosen rather than inherited...</p></div><p>Within reason, absolutely.  I generalize that gang members are more likely to engage in theft and violent crime.  Is that wrong?
</p><p>Regardless of how unreasonable his initial claim that adult games are unacceptable is, reinforcing his view that gamers are predisposed to violence (particularly when even biker gangs haven't threatened you with physical harm under similar circumstances) seems like an obvious responseto a threat from a gamer.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently , it 's ok to generalize based on traits that are chosen rather than inherited...Within reason , absolutely .
I generalize that gang members are more likely to engage in theft and violent crime .
Is that wrong ?
Regardless of how unreasonable his initial claim that adult games are unacceptable is , reinforcing his view that gamers are predisposed to violence ( particularly when even biker gangs have n't threatened you with physical harm under similar circumstances ) seems like an obvious responseto a threat from a gamer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently, it's ok to generalize based on traits that are chosen rather than inherited...Within reason, absolutely.
I generalize that gang members are more likely to engage in theft and violent crime.
Is that wrong?
Regardless of how unreasonable his initial claim that adult games are unacceptable is, reinforcing his view that gamers are predisposed to violence (particularly when even biker gangs haven't threatened you with physical harm under similar circumstances) seems like an obvious responseto a threat from a gamer.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158726</id>
	<title>This might be true</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266351180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't this guy is responsible for delaying, censoring, and outright banning numerous games released in Australia. Maybe there is a merit to gamers being more of a threat to him and his family than bikers. I kinda doubt he has gone out and intentionally kicked any full-patch Hell's Angels in balls recently, but he has gone out and neutered Left 4 Dead 2, just saying.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this guy is responsible for delaying , censoring , and outright banning numerous games released in Australia .
Maybe there is a merit to gamers being more of a threat to him and his family than bikers .
I kinda doubt he has gone out and intentionally kicked any full-patch Hell 's Angels in balls recently , but he has gone out and neutered Left 4 Dead 2 , just saying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this guy is responsible for delaying, censoring, and outright banning numerous games released in Australia.
Maybe there is a merit to gamers being more of a threat to him and his family than bikers.
I kinda doubt he has gone out and intentionally kicked any full-patch Hell's Angels in balls recently, but he has gone out and neutered Left 4 Dead 2, just saying.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160498</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266316080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't disagree that he's a whackjob.  But if people bothered to RTFA (wishful thinking on my part)...</p><p>Atkinson's got very vocal opposition among biker gangs and gamers.</p><p>The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night.  No biker has done that.</p></div><p>Must have been scary. I bet it called him a noob, a faggot, and told him his ass would be "pwned", whatever that means.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't disagree that he 's a whackjob .
But if people bothered to RTFA ( wishful thinking on my part ) ...Atkinson 's got very vocal opposition among biker gangs and gamers.The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night .
No biker has done that.Must have been scary .
I bet it called him a noob , a faggot , and told him his ass would be " pwned " , whatever that means .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't disagree that he's a whackjob.
But if people bothered to RTFA (wishful thinking on my part)...Atkinson's got very vocal opposition among biker gangs and gamers.The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night.
No biker has done that.Must have been scary.
I bet it called him a noob, a faggot, and told him his ass would be "pwned", whatever that means.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159822</id>
	<title>Re:is he right?</title>
	<author>maroonhat</author>
	<datestamp>1266313140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1\%er is a reference to criminally bikers, from an AMA (American Motorcycle Association) publication ('91 I think) claiming that 99\% of bikers are law abiding citizens.  The suggestion of 15\%er is that in AU there are many more criminal bikers than in the US, so many that it might be an acceptable form of shenanigans, like soccer hooligans in GB.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 \ % er is a reference to criminally bikers , from an AMA ( American Motorcycle Association ) publication ( '91 I think ) claiming that 99 \ % of bikers are law abiding citizens .
The suggestion of 15 \ % er is that in AU there are many more criminal bikers than in the US , so many that it might be an acceptable form of shenanigans , like soccer hooligans in GB .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1\%er is a reference to criminally bikers, from an AMA (American Motorcycle Association) publication ('91 I think) claiming that 99\% of bikers are law abiding citizens.
The suggestion of 15\%er is that in AU there are many more criminal bikers than in the US, so many that it might be an acceptable form of shenanigans, like soccer hooligans in GB.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31166116</id>
	<title>err this is the same guy....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265056260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the same guy who made headlines recently in regards to people posting political comments in news papers etc he wanted to make it illegal to do it as anonymous<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the same guy who made headlines recently in regards to people posting political comments in news papers etc he wanted to make it illegal to do it as anonymous .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the same guy who made headlines recently in regards to people posting political comments in news papers etc he wanted to make it illegal to do it as anonymous ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163800</id>
	<title>Re:Hells Angels</title>
	<author>Ihmhi</author>
	<datestamp>1266335040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To be fair, motorcycles are a <a href="http://lh4.ggpht.com/\_TVVDdbRQQfg/SCxpHLN7x0I/AAAAAAAABU8/kKK\_DdXHu1U/1196541643442.jpg" title="ggpht.com">little bit different</a> [ggpht.com] down under.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair , motorcycles are a little bit different [ ggpht.com ] down under .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair, motorcycles are a little bit different [ggpht.com] down under.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162196</id>
	<title>Re:The guy's right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266324300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I do have to say that the motorcycle gangs have a better long term plan than the gamers do at this point.  Someone should start a gamer party and run for election on the grounds that you actually know something about what you're trying to regulate.</p></div><p>Gamers are also running a candidate in Mr Atkinsons electorate - <a href="http://www.gamers4croydon.org/" title="gamers4croydon.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.gamers4croydon.org/</a> [gamers4croydon.org]</p><p>Also, Mr Atkinson is a state attorney general (not the federal one). As a SAG, he forms part of the committee of attorneys general, which must form a consensus in order to change the classification system. As the only AG against the R18+ rating for games, he's out of touch with the other states AG's and the only person stopping the change from happening.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do have to say that the motorcycle gangs have a better long term plan than the gamers do at this point .
Someone should start a gamer party and run for election on the grounds that you actually know something about what you 're trying to regulate.Gamers are also running a candidate in Mr Atkinsons electorate - http : //www.gamers4croydon.org/ [ gamers4croydon.org ] Also , Mr Atkinson is a state attorney general ( not the federal one ) .
As a SAG , he forms part of the committee of attorneys general , which must form a consensus in order to change the classification system .
As the only AG against the R18 + rating for games , he 's out of touch with the other states AG 's and the only person stopping the change from happening .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do have to say that the motorcycle gangs have a better long term plan than the gamers do at this point.
Someone should start a gamer party and run for election on the grounds that you actually know something about what you're trying to regulate.Gamers are also running a candidate in Mr Atkinsons electorate - http://www.gamers4croydon.org/ [gamers4croydon.org]Also, Mr Atkinson is a state attorney general (not the federal one).
As a SAG, he forms part of the committee of attorneys general, which must form a consensus in order to change the classification system.
As the only AG against the R18+ rating for games, he's out of touch with the other states AG's and the only person stopping the change from happening.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161472</id>
	<title>Re:The guy's right</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1266320460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Then comes the internet and blows this totally out proportion and saying that this guy thinks that gamers are generally more dangerous than bikers...</p></div><p>Well, what point was he trying to convey by saying this <em>on a gaming show?</em> Are you trying to argue that it was just a totally unrelated personal anecdote, and he didn't actually mean anything by it? That the comment was not supposed to relate to gamers in general in any way?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Then comes the internet and blows this totally out proportion and saying that this guy thinks that gamers are generally more dangerous than bikers...Well , what point was he trying to convey by saying this on a gaming show ?
Are you trying to argue that it was just a totally unrelated personal anecdote , and he did n't actually mean anything by it ?
That the comment was not supposed to relate to gamers in general in any way ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then comes the internet and blows this totally out proportion and saying that this guy thinks that gamers are generally more dangerous than bikers...Well, what point was he trying to convey by saying this on a gaming show?
Are you trying to argue that it was just a totally unrelated personal anecdote, and he didn't actually mean anything by it?
That the comment was not supposed to relate to gamers in general in any way?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163336</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>Nazlfrag</author>
	<datestamp>1266331200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To complete the context, gamers aren't just a bunch of individuals but are also putting forward a candidate to run against him.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To complete the context , gamers are n't just a bunch of individuals but are also putting forward a candidate to run against him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To complete the context, gamers aren't just a bunch of individuals but are also putting forward a candidate to run against him.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31165156</id>
	<title>Re:Veto?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266343920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not sure how it is set up in AU but in Texas if an Attorney General gives an opinion on something it carries the force of law until the legislator makes an actual law concerning the subject or a court strikes down his/her opinion.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The appellate courts of Texas have consistently held that attorney general opinions, although not binding on the courts, are entitled to "great weight." An opinion of the attorney general should be deemed to state the law correctly, unless or until the opinion is modified or overruled by statute, judicial decision, or subsequent attorney general opinion.</p></div><p>source:  http://www.oag.state.tx.us/opin/legal\_authority.shtml</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not sure how it is set up in AU but in Texas if an Attorney General gives an opinion on something it carries the force of law until the legislator makes an actual law concerning the subject or a court strikes down his/her opinion.The appellate courts of Texas have consistently held that attorney general opinions , although not binding on the courts , are entitled to " great weight .
" An opinion of the attorney general should be deemed to state the law correctly , unless or until the opinion is modified or overruled by statute , judicial decision , or subsequent attorney general opinion.source : http : //www.oag.state.tx.us/opin/legal \ _authority.shtml</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not sure how it is set up in AU but in Texas if an Attorney General gives an opinion on something it carries the force of law until the legislator makes an actual law concerning the subject or a court strikes down his/her opinion.The appellate courts of Texas have consistently held that attorney general opinions, although not binding on the courts, are entitled to "great weight.
" An opinion of the attorney general should be deemed to state the law correctly, unless or until the opinion is modified or overruled by statute, judicial decision, or subsequent attorney general opinion.source:  http://www.oag.state.tx.us/opin/legal\_authority.shtml
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160608</id>
	<title>He is a psycho.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266316620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He is like any other "see I told you so" politician that wants to make up all these strange scenarios just so he can get legislation passed that would resolve any misapplication of laws that is unstable mind would think could screw-up his prosecutions.  People like him are the reason why terrorists aren't afraid of the people, because we all get disarmed and the terrorists get recognitions and protections of special handling and treatment that we can't get as a whole.  Where can I live for 4 years with 3 meals a day and no rent, and all I have to do was pretend to be a little loose around some MP's just get away from my 3rd-world shithole of plowing fields with my bare-hands and fighting-off starving locusts?</p><p>Gitmo is quite a hotel on the failed-prosecution side of things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He is like any other " see I told you so " politician that wants to make up all these strange scenarios just so he can get legislation passed that would resolve any misapplication of laws that is unstable mind would think could screw-up his prosecutions .
People like him are the reason why terrorists are n't afraid of the people , because we all get disarmed and the terrorists get recognitions and protections of special handling and treatment that we ca n't get as a whole .
Where can I live for 4 years with 3 meals a day and no rent , and all I have to do was pretend to be a little loose around some MP 's just get away from my 3rd-world shithole of plowing fields with my bare-hands and fighting-off starving locusts ? Gitmo is quite a hotel on the failed-prosecution side of things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He is like any other "see I told you so" politician that wants to make up all these strange scenarios just so he can get legislation passed that would resolve any misapplication of laws that is unstable mind would think could screw-up his prosecutions.
People like him are the reason why terrorists aren't afraid of the people, because we all get disarmed and the terrorists get recognitions and protections of special handling and treatment that we can't get as a whole.
Where can I live for 4 years with 3 meals a day and no rent, and all I have to do was pretend to be a little loose around some MP's just get away from my 3rd-world shithole of plowing fields with my bare-hands and fighting-off starving locusts?Gitmo is quite a hotel on the failed-prosecution side of things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163822</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>Ihmhi</author>
	<datestamp>1266335160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It makes me want to form a Motorcycle Club for gamers. I don't know what the name would be, but our motto would be "Big Hogs and Dual Analogs!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It makes me want to form a Motorcycle Club for gamers .
I do n't know what the name would be , but our motto would be " Big Hogs and Dual Analogs !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It makes me want to form a Motorcycle Club for gamers.
I don't know what the name would be, but our motto would be "Big Hogs and Dual Analogs!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163626</id>
	<title>Re:Hells Angels</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266333420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>or a widdle biker-wiker gang ??</p><p>Just sayin'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>or a widdle biker-wiker gang ?
? Just sayin'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or a widdle biker-wiker gang ?
?Just sayin'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158120</id>
	<title>Hells Angels</title>
	<author>e2d2</author>
	<datestamp>1266348900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hear a challenge Hells Angels/Mongols/Pagans/Insert your club here. This guy just called you all a bunch of pussies!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hear a challenge Hells Angels/Mongols/Pagans/Insert your club here .
This guy just called you all a bunch of pussies !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hear a challenge Hells Angels/Mongols/Pagans/Insert your club here.
This guy just called you all a bunch of pussies!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160254</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>Mister Whirly</author>
	<datestamp>1266314880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So trap and neuter the cats, it is the only real way to reduce a wild cat population. Killing them or moving them somewhere else does not work, and has been tried repeatedly in other areas. TNR (Trap, Neuter, Release) is the only thing that has been proven to work.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So trap and neuter the cats , it is the only real way to reduce a wild cat population .
Killing them or moving them somewhere else does not work , and has been tried repeatedly in other areas .
TNR ( Trap , Neuter , Release ) is the only thing that has been proven to work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So trap and neuter the cats, it is the only real way to reduce a wild cat population.
Killing them or moving them somewhere else does not work, and has been tried repeatedly in other areas.
TNR (Trap, Neuter, Release) is the only thing that has been proven to work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148</id>
	<title>Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>MightyMartian</author>
	<datestamp>1266349020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where does Australia find these whack jobs?  I mean, either the guy is a paranoid schizophrenic or a mental retard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where does Australia find these whack jobs ?
I mean , either the guy is a paranoid schizophrenic or a mental retard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where does Australia find these whack jobs?
I mean, either the guy is a paranoid schizophrenic or a mental retard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161006</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>Falconhell</author>
	<datestamp>1266318480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The gamers are running a candidate against him<br>at the upcoming election too.</p><p>They have condemned this action, which appears to have been taken by an individual not an organisation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The gamers are running a candidate against himat the upcoming election too.They have condemned this action , which appears to have been taken by an individual not an organisation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The gamers are running a candidate against himat the upcoming election too.They have condemned this action, which appears to have been taken by an individual not an organisation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31164480</id>
	<title>It's never the ones who make threats...</title>
	<author>John.Banister</author>
	<datestamp>1266339240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's never the ones who make threats you have to worry about.  It's always one of the ones who seem to pay no particular attention to you - one of those ICAC supporters who seems so quiet...</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's never the ones who make threats you have to worry about .
It 's always one of the ones who seem to pay no particular attention to you - one of those ICAC supporters who seems so quiet.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's never the ones who make threats you have to worry about.
It's always one of the ones who seem to pay no particular attention to you - one of those ICAC supporters who seems so quiet...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162310</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>exomondo</author>
	<datestamp>1266324960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>because if you can discredit a person somehow associated with a group - even if this group is only a group based on a common interest and not an organisation - morons will accept that the behaviour of that one person is representative of the entire group, and douchebag politicians exploit this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>because if you can discredit a person somehow associated with a group - even if this group is only a group based on a common interest and not an organisation - morons will accept that the behaviour of that one person is representative of the entire group , and douchebag politicians exploit this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because if you can discredit a person somehow associated with a group - even if this group is only a group based on a common interest and not an organisation - morons will accept that the behaviour of that one person is representative of the entire group, and douchebag politicians exploit this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163756</id>
	<title>Vote for the opposition/Liberal.</title>
	<author>bejiitas\_wrath</author>
	<datestamp>1266334680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The labour government is facing defeat in the next election. Do not fear them their Hit Points are low. They are proposing the internet filter and will protect us from the evils of child pornography/internet freedom and will make the net safe for everyone. So they say.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The labour government is facing defeat in the next election .
Do not fear them their Hit Points are low .
They are proposing the internet filter and will protect us from the evils of child pornography/internet freedom and will make the net safe for everyone .
So they say .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The labour government is facing defeat in the next election.
Do not fear them their Hit Points are low.
They are proposing the internet filter and will protect us from the evils of child pornography/internet freedom and will make the net safe for everyone.
So they say.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159036</id>
	<title>Re:The guy's right</title>
	<author>testostertwo</author>
	<datestamp>1266352500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Someone should start a gamer party and run for election on the grounds that you actually know something about what you're trying to regulate.</p></div><p>Or even just join the Bikers party and stand a better chance of fixing both asinine attitudes at once. In my opinion politicians as a group represent more of a danger than bikers \_or\_ gamers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone should start a gamer party and run for election on the grounds that you actually know something about what you 're trying to regulate.Or even just join the Bikers party and stand a better chance of fixing both asinine attitudes at once .
In my opinion politicians as a group represent more of a danger than bikers \ _or \ _ gamers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone should start a gamer party and run for election on the grounds that you actually know something about what you're trying to regulate.Or even just join the Bikers party and stand a better chance of fixing both asinine attitudes at once.
In my opinion politicians as a group represent more of a danger than bikers \_or\_ gamers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159662</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>precariousgray</author>
	<datestamp>1266312420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Then was forced to admit he made it up.</p></div><p>No.
<br> <br>
"He was later forced to apologise. The animal was not a cat, the incident happened at another location and bikies weren't involved."
<br> <br>
The article states he was forced to apologi<b>s</b>e.  It is inconclusive as to whether or not he conjured this lie out of thin air, or was simply misinformed.  Given he is a politician, we will never know.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Then was forced to admit he made it up.No .
" He was later forced to apologise .
The animal was not a cat , the incident happened at another location and bikies were n't involved .
" The article states he was forced to apologise .
It is inconclusive as to whether or not he conjured this lie out of thin air , or was simply misinformed .
Given he is a politician , we will never know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then was forced to admit he made it up.No.
"He was later forced to apologise.
The animal was not a cat, the incident happened at another location and bikies weren't involved.
"
 
The article states he was forced to apologise.
It is inconclusive as to whether or not he conjured this lie out of thin air, or was simply misinformed.
Given he is a politician, we will never know.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158948</id>
	<title>+3 reaction adjustment</title>
	<author>TiggertheMad</author>
	<datestamp>1266352140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Someone should start a gamer party and run for election on the grounds that you actually know something about what you're trying to regulate.</i>
<br> <br>
Awesome idea! Who do we know that has an 18 charisma to head up the party?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone should start a gamer party and run for election on the grounds that you actually know something about what you 're trying to regulate .
Awesome idea !
Who do we know that has an 18 charisma to head up the party ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone should start a gamer party and run for election on the grounds that you actually know something about what you're trying to regulate.
Awesome idea!
Who do we know that has an 18 charisma to head up the party?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163532</id>
	<title>Solution - Vote for the opposition on March 20.</title>
	<author>harlequinn</author>
	<datestamp>1266332820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Michael Atkinson is a Labor Attorney-General.</p><p>The incumbent South Australian Government is Labor.</p><p>Vote for the opposition (Liberal, Independant, etc.) in the impending South Australian State Election on the 20th of March 2010 and the new government will invariably give us a new AG.</p><p>If you are in the Croydon electorate - which is where Michael Atkinson's seat it - then you should rally all your friends and vote for the opposition - then he won't even have a seat, let alone be AG.</p><p>Democracy at work people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Michael Atkinson is a Labor Attorney-General.The incumbent South Australian Government is Labor.Vote for the opposition ( Liberal , Independant , etc .
) in the impending South Australian State Election on the 20th of March 2010 and the new government will invariably give us a new AG.If you are in the Croydon electorate - which is where Michael Atkinson 's seat it - then you should rally all your friends and vote for the opposition - then he wo n't even have a seat , let alone be AG.Democracy at work people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Michael Atkinson is a Labor Attorney-General.The incumbent South Australian Government is Labor.Vote for the opposition (Liberal, Independant, etc.
) in the impending South Australian State Election on the 20th of March 2010 and the new government will invariably give us a new AG.If you are in the Croydon electorate - which is where Michael Atkinson's seat it - then you should rally all your friends and vote for the opposition - then he won't even have a seat, let alone be AG.Democracy at work people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158308</id>
	<title>Veto?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266349560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, the AG has the power of the veto in<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.AU? That's a pretty strange arrangement where the guy charged with enforcing the law gets to decide if something should be a law.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , the AG has the power of the veto in .AU ?
That 's a pretty strange arrangement where the guy charged with enforcing the law gets to decide if something should be a law .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, the AG has the power of the veto in .AU?
That's a pretty strange arrangement where the guy charged with enforcing the law gets to decide if something should be a law.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158468</id>
	<title>Self-advertising time</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1266350220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://livingwithanerd.com/violence-in-videogames/" title="livingwithanerd.com" rel="nofollow">My thoughts on violence in videogames</a> [livingwithanerd.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My thoughts on violence in videogames [ livingwithanerd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My thoughts on violence in videogames [livingwithanerd.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159434</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>NFN\_NLN</author>
	<datestamp>1266311280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Atkinson's got very vocal opposition among biker gangs and gamers.

The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night.  No biker has done that.</p>
 </div><p>You fools!  Can't you see that a biker did leave that note to frame the gamers and take the heat of the biker gangs.  You're playing right into their trap, fools!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Atkinson 's got very vocal opposition among biker gangs and gamers .
The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night .
No biker has done that .
You fools !
Ca n't you see that a biker did leave that note to frame the gamers and take the heat of the biker gangs .
You 're playing right into their trap , fools !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Atkinson's got very vocal opposition among biker gangs and gamers.
The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night.
No biker has done that.
You fools!
Can't you see that a biker did leave that note to frame the gamers and take the heat of the biker gangs.
You're playing right into their trap, fools!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160862</id>
	<title>What does the AG do??</title>
	<author>Kanasta</author>
	<datestamp>1266317760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If teenagers playing games in darkened rooms threatens your way of life, you should probably change to a better way of life...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If teenagers playing games in darkened rooms threatens your way of life , you should probably change to a better way of life.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If teenagers playing games in darkened rooms threatens your way of life, you should probably change to a better way of life...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160450</id>
	<title>Re:Veto?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266315780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... the guy charged with enforcing the law gets to decide if something should be a law.</p></div><p>You mean like the President of the United States?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... the guy charged with enforcing the law gets to decide if something should be a law.You mean like the President of the United States ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... the guy charged with enforcing the law gets to decide if something should be a law.You mean like the President of the United States?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162744</id>
	<title>Re:Hells Angels</title>
	<author>g-lock82</author>
	<datestamp>1266327360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Possibly someone trying to catch a <a href="http://www.news.com.au/national/chance-encounter-sparked-deadly-brawl/story-e6frfkwi-1225692692588" title="news.com.au" rel="nofollow">connecting flight?</a> [news.com.au]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Possibly someone trying to catch a connecting flight ?
[ news.com.au ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Possibly someone trying to catch a connecting flight?
[news.com.au]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31164422</id>
	<title>Atkinso = Christian Nazi and Hypocrite.</title>
	<author>dogzdik</author>
	<datestamp>1266338880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>
Atkinson says that homosexuality should be banned - because the bible tells him so; <p>Praise jeezers</p><p>

And then he goes home and fucks his wife in the arse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Atkinson says that homosexuality should be banned - because the bible tells him so ; Praise jeezers And then he goes home and fucks his wife in the arse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Atkinson says that homosexuality should be banned - because the bible tells him so; Praise jeezers

And then he goes home and fucks his wife in the arse.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163794</id>
	<title>Re:The guy's right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266334980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fear and loathing in Attourney General Michael Atkinson's head.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fear and loathing in Attourney General Michael Atkinson 's head .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fear and loathing in Attourney General Michael Atkinson's head.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31198034</id>
	<title>Re:Hells Angels</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266587160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(Posting anon because Atkinson is known to track down people who make comments he doesn't like and make legal threats.)</p><p>Here in Australia there's two terms: "Bikies" refers to so-called outlaw motorcycle clubs... Hells Angels, Rebels, Finks, Gypsy Jokers, Bandidos are the ones that immediately spring to mind. The blokes that ride around with a "1\%" patch on their vest. "Bikers" refers to other motorcycle clubs and individual motorcycle riders.</p><p>Atkinson's remarks are all the more insane in light of an event that occurred not a week before his quip - an alleged associate of the Hells Angels and an accomplice were killed when a bomb they were allegedly delivering to assassinate the head of a street gang exploded in their car a few metres away from the target's home. The two gangs have allegedly been involved in an ongoing dispute over drug dealing that has lead to shootouts in the CBD ("downtown" for the Americans) and drive-by shootings.</p><p>To put it all into some context, there is a state government election on March 20 and the current government of which Atkinson is a part of, are vying for a 3rd 4 year term. Over the last eight years the government has played up the threat of the bikie gangs to the general public. The bikies are the boogey men that are coming to get you and your family and only the current government can save you from them with their draconian new laws (Which incidentally were drafted by Atkinson and have been rejected by the state's highest court as unconstitutional when challenged by the first few bikies they were used against. It gets even better though because Atkinson was warned that would happen but proceeded anyway).</p><p>Atkinson is a liability for the current government with his increasingly bizarre behaviour, but he's not going anywhere because of backroom deals done by factions of the ruling Labor party. If it wasn't for that he probably would have been dumped years ago because he's basically delivered one scandal/debacle after another. Before his latest furphies of the last couple of months, the biggest one was calling a judge "daft and delusional" then being sued by said judge for defamation and losing and having us taxpayers fork out for his defense and $200,000 damages bill.</p><p>I believe he takes delight in trolling gamers, because as he has previously said that a R18+ rating for video games is not a significant issue in his electorate so he doesn't care what the rest of Australia thinks because for some reason he has something like 70\% of the vote in his electorate. He taunted gamers to run against him and now perhaps unsurprisingly some gamers have formed a political party (Gamers 4 Croydon) and are running a candidate against him. I can only surmise that since they are out actively campaigning in his electorate and are receiving mainstream media coverage that they are making an impact for him to be amping up the rhetoric, much as the government ramped up the rhetoric against the opposition Liberal party a couple of weeks ago when an opinion poll showed that more people trust the opposition than the government.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( Posting anon because Atkinson is known to track down people who make comments he does n't like and make legal threats .
) Here in Australia there 's two terms : " Bikies " refers to so-called outlaw motorcycle clubs... Hells Angels , Rebels , Finks , Gypsy Jokers , Bandidos are the ones that immediately spring to mind .
The blokes that ride around with a " 1 \ % " patch on their vest .
" Bikers " refers to other motorcycle clubs and individual motorcycle riders.Atkinson 's remarks are all the more insane in light of an event that occurred not a week before his quip - an alleged associate of the Hells Angels and an accomplice were killed when a bomb they were allegedly delivering to assassinate the head of a street gang exploded in their car a few metres away from the target 's home .
The two gangs have allegedly been involved in an ongoing dispute over drug dealing that has lead to shootouts in the CBD ( " downtown " for the Americans ) and drive-by shootings.To put it all into some context , there is a state government election on March 20 and the current government of which Atkinson is a part of , are vying for a 3rd 4 year term .
Over the last eight years the government has played up the threat of the bikie gangs to the general public .
The bikies are the boogey men that are coming to get you and your family and only the current government can save you from them with their draconian new laws ( Which incidentally were drafted by Atkinson and have been rejected by the state 's highest court as unconstitutional when challenged by the first few bikies they were used against .
It gets even better though because Atkinson was warned that would happen but proceeded anyway ) .Atkinson is a liability for the current government with his increasingly bizarre behaviour , but he 's not going anywhere because of backroom deals done by factions of the ruling Labor party .
If it was n't for that he probably would have been dumped years ago because he 's basically delivered one scandal/debacle after another .
Before his latest furphies of the last couple of months , the biggest one was calling a judge " daft and delusional " then being sued by said judge for defamation and losing and having us taxpayers fork out for his defense and $ 200,000 damages bill.I believe he takes delight in trolling gamers , because as he has previously said that a R18 + rating for video games is not a significant issue in his electorate so he does n't care what the rest of Australia thinks because for some reason he has something like 70 \ % of the vote in his electorate .
He taunted gamers to run against him and now perhaps unsurprisingly some gamers have formed a political party ( Gamers 4 Croydon ) and are running a candidate against him .
I can only surmise that since they are out actively campaigning in his electorate and are receiving mainstream media coverage that they are making an impact for him to be amping up the rhetoric , much as the government ramped up the rhetoric against the opposition Liberal party a couple of weeks ago when an opinion poll showed that more people trust the opposition than the government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(Posting anon because Atkinson is known to track down people who make comments he doesn't like and make legal threats.
)Here in Australia there's two terms: "Bikies" refers to so-called outlaw motorcycle clubs... Hells Angels, Rebels, Finks, Gypsy Jokers, Bandidos are the ones that immediately spring to mind.
The blokes that ride around with a "1\%" patch on their vest.
"Bikers" refers to other motorcycle clubs and individual motorcycle riders.Atkinson's remarks are all the more insane in light of an event that occurred not a week before his quip - an alleged associate of the Hells Angels and an accomplice were killed when a bomb they were allegedly delivering to assassinate the head of a street gang exploded in their car a few metres away from the target's home.
The two gangs have allegedly been involved in an ongoing dispute over drug dealing that has lead to shootouts in the CBD ("downtown" for the Americans) and drive-by shootings.To put it all into some context, there is a state government election on March 20 and the current government of which Atkinson is a part of, are vying for a 3rd 4 year term.
Over the last eight years the government has played up the threat of the bikie gangs to the general public.
The bikies are the boogey men that are coming to get you and your family and only the current government can save you from them with their draconian new laws (Which incidentally were drafted by Atkinson and have been rejected by the state's highest court as unconstitutional when challenged by the first few bikies they were used against.
It gets even better though because Atkinson was warned that would happen but proceeded anyway).Atkinson is a liability for the current government with his increasingly bizarre behaviour, but he's not going anywhere because of backroom deals done by factions of the ruling Labor party.
If it wasn't for that he probably would have been dumped years ago because he's basically delivered one scandal/debacle after another.
Before his latest furphies of the last couple of months, the biggest one was calling a judge "daft and delusional" then being sued by said judge for defamation and losing and having us taxpayers fork out for his defense and $200,000 damages bill.I believe he takes delight in trolling gamers, because as he has previously said that a R18+ rating for video games is not a significant issue in his electorate so he doesn't care what the rest of Australia thinks because for some reason he has something like 70\% of the vote in his electorate.
He taunted gamers to run against him and now perhaps unsurprisingly some gamers have formed a political party (Gamers 4 Croydon) and are running a candidate against him.
I can only surmise that since they are out actively campaigning in his electorate and are receiving mainstream media coverage that they are making an impact for him to be amping up the rhetoric, much as the government ramped up the rhetoric against the opposition Liberal party a couple of weeks ago when an opinion poll showed that more people trust the opposition than the government.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159372</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266310980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night. No biker has done that.</p></div><p>If I were a biker and I wanted attention off me, that's exactly what I'd do.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night .
No biker has done that.If I were a biker and I wanted attention off me , that 's exactly what I 'd do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night.
No biker has done that.If I were a biker and I wanted attention off me, that's exactly what I'd do.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159732</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>Pinky's Brain</author>
	<datestamp>1266312780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The politically organized one, they act as a front<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... if they turn violent you have a group facing you. A group known to get very violent in an organized way, even against some pretty high visibility targets. Here in the Netherlands a group of Hells Angels came into a TV studio, beat some people up and forced the host to read a reclamation from an earlier statement they were a criminal organization.</p><p>From the other group you are only fearing one individual, even if he's serious it's still only one guy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The politically organized one , they act as a front ... if they turn violent you have a group facing you .
A group known to get very violent in an organized way , even against some pretty high visibility targets .
Here in the Netherlands a group of Hells Angels came into a TV studio , beat some people up and forced the host to read a reclamation from an earlier statement they were a criminal organization.From the other group you are only fearing one individual , even if he 's serious it 's still only one guy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The politically organized one, they act as a front ... if they turn violent you have a group facing you.
A group known to get very violent in an organized way, even against some pretty high visibility targets.
Here in the Netherlands a group of Hells Angels came into a TV studio, beat some people up and forced the host to read a reclamation from an earlier statement they were a criminal organization.From the other group you are only fearing one individual, even if he's serious it's still only one guy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163000</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>Renraku</author>
	<datestamp>1266328680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Next up:</p><p>Free speech advocates are more violent than most criminals!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Next up : Free speech advocates are more violent than most criminals !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next up:Free speech advocates are more violent than most criminals!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162832</id>
	<title>Re:The guy's right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266327780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone did.</p><p><a href="http://www.gamers4croydon.org/" title="gamers4croydon.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.gamers4croydon.org/</a> [gamers4croydon.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone did.http : //www.gamers4croydon.org/ [ gamers4croydon.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone did.http://www.gamers4croydon.org/ [gamers4croydon.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158428</id>
	<title>is he right?</title>
	<author>TheCarp</author>
	<datestamp>1266349980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think he is!</p><p>Thats to say... I agree that biker gangs are about as ridiculous of a thing to worry about harming your family as video games.</p><p>Unless you have lots of contact with a biker gang, or have 1\%er in the family, or have some other factor which makes you more likely to be involved in biker gang violence (maybe you are a meth addict with a penchant for not havening the money?) or maybe if you live next door to a particularly disliked gang member or chapter president, then... really.... what a stupid thing to worry about.</p><p>Theres what, maybe, one biker gang member per couple of million per capita here. Are they like 15\%ers in Australia? Are biker gangs like soccer hooligans? Do the outlaw bikers have a national political party?</p><p>I mean seriously.... why not compare the danger of video games to lightning strikes or shark attacks as dangers to your family. How do they rate against.... dust mites! I garauntee bed bugs are worst!</p><p>-Steve</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think he is ! Thats to say... I agree that biker gangs are about as ridiculous of a thing to worry about harming your family as video games.Unless you have lots of contact with a biker gang , or have 1 \ % er in the family , or have some other factor which makes you more likely to be involved in biker gang violence ( maybe you are a meth addict with a penchant for not havening the money ?
) or maybe if you live next door to a particularly disliked gang member or chapter president , then... really.... what a stupid thing to worry about.Theres what , maybe , one biker gang member per couple of million per capita here .
Are they like 15 \ % ers in Australia ?
Are biker gangs like soccer hooligans ?
Do the outlaw bikers have a national political party ? I mean seriously.... why not compare the danger of video games to lightning strikes or shark attacks as dangers to your family .
How do they rate against.... dust mites !
I garauntee bed bugs are worst ! -Steve</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think he is!Thats to say... I agree that biker gangs are about as ridiculous of a thing to worry about harming your family as video games.Unless you have lots of contact with a biker gang, or have 1\%er in the family, or have some other factor which makes you more likely to be involved in biker gang violence (maybe you are a meth addict with a penchant for not havening the money?
) or maybe if you live next door to a particularly disliked gang member or chapter president, then... really.... what a stupid thing to worry about.Theres what, maybe, one biker gang member per couple of million per capita here.
Are they like 15\%ers in Australia?
Are biker gangs like soccer hooligans?
Do the outlaw bikers have a national political party?I mean seriously.... why not compare the danger of video games to lightning strikes or shark attacks as dangers to your family.
How do they rate against.... dust mites!
I garauntee bed bugs are worst!-Steve</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162936</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>PaganRitual</author>
	<datestamp>1266328380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night. No biker has done that.</p></div><p>Exactly. The bikers that blew themselves up in their car last week in Adelaide while taking a bomb to go kill another rival biker were missing that 'note under the door' edginess to really let the other biker gang know that they meant business. All the really dangerous types know that the best way to take care of the opposition is via slips of paper under the door. Let someone know you're coming for that extra added suprise.</p><p>If someone was actually going to do something incredibly idiotic like trying to hurt him because of a game classification rating, I don't know if starting out with a nasty note is the way to go. I suppose it's not like he has a WoW character to camp though.</p><p>Also, we're talking about a guy that made up a story about bikers BBQing and eating a cat, later proven to be completely false. In addition to this being the guy that wanted online political commentary to be accompanied by actual names and postcodes because of an example poster that was clearly a fake name working as an opposition shill, because Atkinson knows everyone in his district. Except the guy actually existed, lived half a km away from his office, and had actually been in there before.</p><p>It's not entirely outside the realms of possibilty for this to also have been made up. Back when there was just some quiet rumblings as to his "I know whats best for everyone else" control mentality, he was quietly smug and arrogant. Now that the real backlash and the reality of that is coming out, the crazy we all assumed was simmering beneath the surface is coming to the fore.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night .
No biker has done that.Exactly .
The bikers that blew themselves up in their car last week in Adelaide while taking a bomb to go kill another rival biker were missing that 'note under the door ' edginess to really let the other biker gang know that they meant business .
All the really dangerous types know that the best way to take care of the opposition is via slips of paper under the door .
Let someone know you 're coming for that extra added suprise.If someone was actually going to do something incredibly idiotic like trying to hurt him because of a game classification rating , I do n't know if starting out with a nasty note is the way to go .
I suppose it 's not like he has a WoW character to camp though.Also , we 're talking about a guy that made up a story about bikers BBQing and eating a cat , later proven to be completely false .
In addition to this being the guy that wanted online political commentary to be accompanied by actual names and postcodes because of an example poster that was clearly a fake name working as an opposition shill , because Atkinson knows everyone in his district .
Except the guy actually existed , lived half a km away from his office , and had actually been in there before.It 's not entirely outside the realms of possibilty for this to also have been made up .
Back when there was just some quiet rumblings as to his " I know whats best for everyone else " control mentality , he was quietly smug and arrogant .
Now that the real backlash and the reality of that is coming out , the crazy we all assumed was simmering beneath the surface is coming to the fore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night.
No biker has done that.Exactly.
The bikers that blew themselves up in their car last week in Adelaide while taking a bomb to go kill another rival biker were missing that 'note under the door' edginess to really let the other biker gang know that they meant business.
All the really dangerous types know that the best way to take care of the opposition is via slips of paper under the door.
Let someone know you're coming for that extra added suprise.If someone was actually going to do something incredibly idiotic like trying to hurt him because of a game classification rating, I don't know if starting out with a nasty note is the way to go.
I suppose it's not like he has a WoW character to camp though.Also, we're talking about a guy that made up a story about bikers BBQing and eating a cat, later proven to be completely false.
In addition to this being the guy that wanted online political commentary to be accompanied by actual names and postcodes because of an example poster that was clearly a fake name working as an opposition shill, because Atkinson knows everyone in his district.
Except the guy actually existed, lived half a km away from his office, and had actually been in there before.It's not entirely outside the realms of possibilty for this to also have been made up.
Back when there was just some quiet rumblings as to his "I know whats best for everyone else" control mentality, he was quietly smug and arrogant.
Now that the real backlash and the reality of that is coming out, the crazy we all assumed was simmering beneath the surface is coming to the fore.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31165138</id>
	<title>Bikers?</title>
	<author>Phoghat</author>
	<datestamp>1266343860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think he's watched <i>"Mad  Max"</i> too many times.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think he 's watched " Mad Max " too many times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think he's watched "Mad  Max" too many times.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159058</id>
	<title>Re:is he right?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266352620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF is a 1\%er or a 15\%er?  Is it something to do with what beer they drinks?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF is a 1 \ % er or a 15 \ % er ?
Is it something to do with what beer they drinks ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF is a 1\%er or a 15\%er?
Is it something to do with what beer they drinks?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159676</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>element-o.p.</author>
	<datestamp>1266312420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let me think about it for a second...let's see...who's scarier?  On the one hand, we have a 16 y.o. bone-skinny nerd with masking tape on his glasses who has never even met his ten best friends IRL.  Granted, he did slip a threatening note under my door, but still...my eight year old daughter could break him in half.  On the other hand, we have a six foot plus, 300 pound, leather-clad, tattooed, knife-wielding man, who's ten best friends have stood beside him in bar brawls for the last 20 years.  He may never have said a threatening word to me, but then again, he doesn't have to.
<br> <br>
Yeah, sorry.  I gotta go with the biker dude as the scarier of the two.
<br> <br>
Disclaimer: I also am (just) over six feet tall, (sometimes) wear leather and ride a motorcycle.  However, I am considerably less than 300 pounds, I have never had a tattoo, nor have I ever been in a bar brawl.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me think about it for a second...let 's see...who 's scarier ?
On the one hand , we have a 16 y.o .
bone-skinny nerd with masking tape on his glasses who has never even met his ten best friends IRL .
Granted , he did slip a threatening note under my door , but still...my eight year old daughter could break him in half .
On the other hand , we have a six foot plus , 300 pound , leather-clad , tattooed , knife-wielding man , who 's ten best friends have stood beside him in bar brawls for the last 20 years .
He may never have said a threatening word to me , but then again , he does n't have to .
Yeah , sorry .
I got ta go with the biker dude as the scarier of the two .
Disclaimer : I also am ( just ) over six feet tall , ( sometimes ) wear leather and ride a motorcycle .
However , I am considerably less than 300 pounds , I have never had a tattoo , nor have I ever been in a bar brawl .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me think about it for a second...let's see...who's scarier?
On the one hand, we have a 16 y.o.
bone-skinny nerd with masking tape on his glasses who has never even met his ten best friends IRL.
Granted, he did slip a threatening note under my door, but still...my eight year old daughter could break him in half.
On the other hand, we have a six foot plus, 300 pound, leather-clad, tattooed, knife-wielding man, who's ten best friends have stood beside him in bar brawls for the last 20 years.
He may never have said a threatening word to me, but then again, he doesn't have to.
Yeah, sorry.
I gotta go with the biker dude as the scarier of the two.
Disclaimer: I also am (just) over six feet tall, (sometimes) wear leather and ride a motorcycle.
However, I am considerably less than 300 pounds, I have never had a tattoo, nor have I ever been in a bar brawl.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159264</id>
	<title>Re:is he right?</title>
	<author>Lumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1266353520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most 1\% er's people see are actually posers.  I've been an official photographer for most of the BIG motorcycle events in the eastern half of the USA and real bikers that are real 1\%er's are far and few between..  Most of the time you have a 1\%er poser.  someone that wants to look like a badass but in reality is a big pussy that wants attention.  Problem is at Sturgis these posers get their asses kicked by the real 1\%ers because they try and pull their bullshit in front of them.</p><p>a Real 1\%er when you find one will let you know. I've met a few of them, and I steer clear after I buy them a drink and they let me know of who to steer clear of.</p><p>So that loser riding his shiny new 2010 harley all leathered up with harley jeans, harley shirt and skull print face mask... He is, in fact, a poser.  1\%er's don't have new bikes and dress in all that branded crap at the hardly store.</p><p>A real 1\%er has a jacket that has road rash on it and looks like he at one time was ran over by a truck, because they typically lead incredibly hard lives.  I have almost lost a camera to a 1\%er. I gladly handed it over, saying "I'm sorry, here you go".. surprisingly he stopped, asked how to remove the card and threw me the camera back grunting, "NO PICTURES".</p><p>You don't screw with a 1\%er.  In fact I don't even raise my camera in their general direction. After the 6 years of shooting at Sturgis and other big events I can spot them easily.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most 1 \ % er 's people see are actually posers .
I 've been an official photographer for most of the BIG motorcycle events in the eastern half of the USA and real bikers that are real 1 \ % er 's are far and few between.. Most of the time you have a 1 \ % er poser .
someone that wants to look like a badass but in reality is a big pussy that wants attention .
Problem is at Sturgis these posers get their asses kicked by the real 1 \ % ers because they try and pull their bullshit in front of them.a Real 1 \ % er when you find one will let you know .
I 've met a few of them , and I steer clear after I buy them a drink and they let me know of who to steer clear of.So that loser riding his shiny new 2010 harley all leathered up with harley jeans , harley shirt and skull print face mask... He is , in fact , a poser .
1 \ % er 's do n't have new bikes and dress in all that branded crap at the hardly store.A real 1 \ % er has a jacket that has road rash on it and looks like he at one time was ran over by a truck , because they typically lead incredibly hard lives .
I have almost lost a camera to a 1 \ % er .
I gladly handed it over , saying " I 'm sorry , here you go " .. surprisingly he stopped , asked how to remove the card and threw me the camera back grunting , " NO PICTURES " .You do n't screw with a 1 \ % er .
In fact I do n't even raise my camera in their general direction .
After the 6 years of shooting at Sturgis and other big events I can spot them easily .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most 1\% er's people see are actually posers.
I've been an official photographer for most of the BIG motorcycle events in the eastern half of the USA and real bikers that are real 1\%er's are far and few between..  Most of the time you have a 1\%er poser.
someone that wants to look like a badass but in reality is a big pussy that wants attention.
Problem is at Sturgis these posers get their asses kicked by the real 1\%ers because they try and pull their bullshit in front of them.a Real 1\%er when you find one will let you know.
I've met a few of them, and I steer clear after I buy them a drink and they let me know of who to steer clear of.So that loser riding his shiny new 2010 harley all leathered up with harley jeans, harley shirt and skull print face mask... He is, in fact, a poser.
1\%er's don't have new bikes and dress in all that branded crap at the hardly store.A real 1\%er has a jacket that has road rash on it and looks like he at one time was ran over by a truck, because they typically lead incredibly hard lives.
I have almost lost a camera to a 1\%er.
I gladly handed it over, saying "I'm sorry, here you go".. surprisingly he stopped, asked how to remove the card and threw me the camera back grunting, "NO PICTURES".You don't screw with a 1\%er.
In fact I don't even raise my camera in their general direction.
After the 6 years of shooting at Sturgis and other big events I can spot them easily.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158330</id>
	<title>Of course!</title>
	<author>geoffaus</author>
	<datestamp>1266349620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course they are scarier - they get multiple lives!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course they are scarier - they get multiple lives !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course they are scarier - they get multiple lives!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163938</id>
	<title>WOW! I didn't realize ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266336060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WOW! I didn't realize Australian biker gangs were such pansy's.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WOW !
I did n't realize Australian biker gangs were such pansy 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WOW!
I didn't realize Australian biker gangs were such pansy's.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31178778</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>riprjak</author>
	<datestamp>1265031900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed...  If a person placed a note under my door threatening my family in the middle of the night would be cause for concern regarding the behavior of deranged and possibly violent people who stalk my house.  I just do not see what this has to do with gamers.  I can't think of any way in which the alleged commission of any crime can be caused by your enjoying video games.</p><p>I mean, they arrested a shotgun wielding bandit in Adelaide recently and he had a drivers license and lived in a house...  so are we to be scared of drivers and people who aren't homeless now because they will all shoot us in the face with a shotgun???  or should we perhaps reserve that particular fear for shotgun wielding bandits regardless of their hobbies?</p><p>It is a gross overstatement to tar all people who share a hobby with the acts of a single individual who claims to share that hobby but cannot prove it.</p><p>I could go on to discuss the base rate fallacy in this context but I feel my point is made.<br>err!<br>jak.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed... If a person placed a note under my door threatening my family in the middle of the night would be cause for concern regarding the behavior of deranged and possibly violent people who stalk my house .
I just do not see what this has to do with gamers .
I ca n't think of any way in which the alleged commission of any crime can be caused by your enjoying video games.I mean , they arrested a shotgun wielding bandit in Adelaide recently and he had a drivers license and lived in a house... so are we to be scared of drivers and people who are n't homeless now because they will all shoot us in the face with a shotgun ? ? ?
or should we perhaps reserve that particular fear for shotgun wielding bandits regardless of their hobbies ? It is a gross overstatement to tar all people who share a hobby with the acts of a single individual who claims to share that hobby but can not prove it.I could go on to discuss the base rate fallacy in this context but I feel my point is made.err ! jak .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed...  If a person placed a note under my door threatening my family in the middle of the night would be cause for concern regarding the behavior of deranged and possibly violent people who stalk my house.
I just do not see what this has to do with gamers.
I can't think of any way in which the alleged commission of any crime can be caused by your enjoying video games.I mean, they arrested a shotgun wielding bandit in Adelaide recently and he had a drivers license and lived in a house...  so are we to be scared of drivers and people who aren't homeless now because they will all shoot us in the face with a shotgun???
or should we perhaps reserve that particular fear for shotgun wielding bandits regardless of their hobbies?It is a gross overstatement to tar all people who share a hobby with the acts of a single individual who claims to share that hobby but cannot prove it.I could go on to discuss the base rate fallacy in this context but I feel my point is made.err!jak.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163036</id>
	<title>Re:What a tit</title>
	<author>Macgrrl</author>
	<datestamp>1266328920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>I'm pretty sure that "Australian politician" doesn't mean paranoid, misinformed and dangerously ignorant jerk"... but I could be wrong</i> </p><p>Possibly means "madder than a cut snake" and "couldn't lie straight in bed". Conroy is not helping the image.</p><p>Sometimes you get the impression they have forgotten that Australia is supposed to be a Representative Democracy - they are supposed to represent the views and interests of the electorate - NOT thier personal views.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure that " Australian politician " does n't mean paranoid , misinformed and dangerously ignorant jerk " ... but I could be wrong Possibly means " madder than a cut snake " and " could n't lie straight in bed " .
Conroy is not helping the image.Sometimes you get the impression they have forgotten that Australia is supposed to be a Representative Democracy - they are supposed to represent the views and interests of the electorate - NOT thier personal views .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I'm pretty sure that "Australian politician" doesn't mean paranoid, misinformed and dangerously ignorant jerk"... but I could be wrong Possibly means "madder than a cut snake" and "couldn't lie straight in bed".
Conroy is not helping the image.Sometimes you get the impression they have forgotten that Australia is supposed to be a Representative Democracy - they are supposed to represent the views and interests of the electorate - NOT thier personal views.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158912</id>
	<title>Aussie Jack Thompson?</title>
	<author>TiggertheMad</author>
	<datestamp>1266351960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interesting to note, that he basses his views of the groups as a whole on the behavior of individuals.
<br> <br>
Were he to say, "I am more worried about black people* than Mexicans because a black person slipped a note under my door." he would get eaten alive by the public outcry. Apparently, it's ok to generalize based on traits that are chosen rather than inherited...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting to note , that he basses his views of the groups as a whole on the behavior of individuals .
Were he to say , " I am more worried about black people * than Mexicans because a black person slipped a note under my door .
" he would get eaten alive by the public outcry .
Apparently , it 's ok to generalize based on traits that are chosen rather than inherited.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting to note, that he basses his views of the groups as a whole on the behavior of individuals.
Were he to say, "I am more worried about black people* than Mexicans because a black person slipped a note under my door.
" he would get eaten alive by the public outcry.
Apparently, it's ok to generalize based on traits that are chosen rather than inherited...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161272</id>
	<title>Re:is he right?</title>
	<author>AHuxley</author>
	<datestamp>1266319620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Gangs would on average be a known to state and federal task forces.<br>  With licence plate and facial recognition of event photographs, early reconnaissance of a state of federal minister could be detected.<br>
Kind of hard to hide your face too well at a day in the park, mall or city or suburbia during a meet and greet.<br>
Every gang member would be in a shared database.<br>
Next event, security is up and your 'gang' is distracted by state and federal bureaucracy, police roadworthiness questions and infiltration.<br>
Now the random lone wolf gamer showing up at an event and requesting their 'you tube' back or talking about a sitting member as if they where the taliban on camera is hard to deal with.<br>
They show up, make their point and are back to life in suburbia with a 'win' video or detained with a 'dropped' video device.<br>
Their courage and/or arrest 'you tube' event video becomes infectious.<br>
Anyone in the crowd could be a gamer ready to campaign over the Senator Conroy issue.<br>
The ALP has two options, clean, controlled events.<br>
Option two is up security and have the staff filmed protecting a member from the truth.<br>
That attracts more gamers for the 'win' and requests for collar numbers from plain clothed officers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gangs would on average be a known to state and federal task forces .
With licence plate and facial recognition of event photographs , early reconnaissance of a state of federal minister could be detected .
Kind of hard to hide your face too well at a day in the park , mall or city or suburbia during a meet and greet .
Every gang member would be in a shared database .
Next event , security is up and your 'gang ' is distracted by state and federal bureaucracy , police roadworthiness questions and infiltration .
Now the random lone wolf gamer showing up at an event and requesting their 'you tube ' back or talking about a sitting member as if they where the taliban on camera is hard to deal with .
They show up , make their point and are back to life in suburbia with a 'win ' video or detained with a 'dropped ' video device .
Their courage and/or arrest 'you tube ' event video becomes infectious .
Anyone in the crowd could be a gamer ready to campaign over the Senator Conroy issue .
The ALP has two options , clean , controlled events .
Option two is up security and have the staff filmed protecting a member from the truth .
That attracts more gamers for the 'win ' and requests for collar numbers from plain clothed officers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gangs would on average be a known to state and federal task forces.
With licence plate and facial recognition of event photographs, early reconnaissance of a state of federal minister could be detected.
Kind of hard to hide your face too well at a day in the park, mall or city or suburbia during a meet and greet.
Every gang member would be in a shared database.
Next event, security is up and your 'gang' is distracted by state and federal bureaucracy, police roadworthiness questions and infiltration.
Now the random lone wolf gamer showing up at an event and requesting their 'you tube' back or talking about a sitting member as if they where the taliban on camera is hard to deal with.
They show up, make their point and are back to life in suburbia with a 'win' video or detained with a 'dropped' video device.
Their courage and/or arrest 'you tube' event video becomes infectious.
Anyone in the crowd could be a gamer ready to campaign over the Senator Conroy issue.
The ALP has two options, clean, controlled events.
Option two is up security and have the staff filmed protecting a member from the truth.
That attracts more gamers for the 'win' and requests for collar numbers from plain clothed officers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159370</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>Volante3192</author>
	<datestamp>1266310920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm a bigger fan of when he said Aaron Fornarino doesn't exist...and then a paper ran a story on this 'non-existant' guy.</p><p><a href="http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/mike-meet-aaron-he-lives-500m-from-your-office/story-e6frea6u-1225826082741" title="adelaidenow.com.au">http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/mike-meet-aaron-he-lives-500m-from-your-office/story-e6frea6u-1225826082741</a> [adelaidenow.com.au]</p><p>Now...if it was Mr Fornarino who slipped the letter, we're in the clear, cause he doesn't exist!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a bigger fan of when he said Aaron Fornarino does n't exist...and then a paper ran a story on this 'non-existant ' guy.http : //www.adelaidenow.com.au/mike-meet-aaron-he-lives-500m-from-your-office/story-e6frea6u-1225826082741 [ adelaidenow.com.au ] Now...if it was Mr Fornarino who slipped the letter , we 're in the clear , cause he does n't exist !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a bigger fan of when he said Aaron Fornarino doesn't exist...and then a paper ran a story on this 'non-existant' guy.http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/mike-meet-aaron-he-lives-500m-from-your-office/story-e6frea6u-1225826082741 [adelaidenow.com.au]Now...if it was Mr Fornarino who slipped the letter, we're in the clear, cause he doesn't exist!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158670</id>
	<title>Re:Hells Angels</title>
	<author>TubeSteak</author>
	<datestamp>1266350940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I hear a challenge Hells Angels/Mongols/Pagans/Insert your club here. This guy just called you all a bunch of pussies!</p></div><p>The bikers are running a candidate for Attorney General against him.<br>Maybe the biker candidate should co-opt gamers by advocating their cause.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hear a challenge Hells Angels/Mongols/Pagans/Insert your club here .
This guy just called you all a bunch of pussies ! The bikers are running a candidate for Attorney General against him.Maybe the biker candidate should co-opt gamers by advocating their cause .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hear a challenge Hells Angels/Mongols/Pagans/Insert your club here.
This guy just called you all a bunch of pussies!The bikers are running a candidate for Attorney General against him.Maybe the biker candidate should co-opt gamers by advocating their cause.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159460</id>
	<title>Re:Hells Angels</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266311400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I hear a challenge Hells Angels/Mongols/Pagans/Insert your club here.</p></div><p>It makes you wonder if one of his competitors faked the whole thing to put a hit out on him.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hear a challenge Hells Angels/Mongols/Pagans/Insert your club here.It makes you wonder if one of his competitors faked the whole thing to put a hit out on him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hear a challenge Hells Angels/Mongols/Pagans/Insert your club here.It makes you wonder if one of his competitors faked the whole thing to put a hit out on him.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158524</id>
	<title>Re:Hells Angels</title>
	<author>Deadplant</author>
	<datestamp>1266350400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>according to TFA their 'biker gags' are called 'bikies'.<br>wtf?<br>makes sense now... who would be afraid of a widdle bikie-wikee gang?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>according to TFA their 'biker gags ' are called 'bikies'.wtf ? makes sense now... who would be afraid of a widdle bikie-wikee gang ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>according to TFA their 'biker gags' are called 'bikies'.wtf?makes sense now... who would be afraid of a widdle bikie-wikee gang?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158354</id>
	<title>Well....Yeah?</title>
	<author>Drakin020</author>
	<datestamp>1266349740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And Bikers would be more of a threat to me than terrorist if I tried to outlaw motorcycles.</p><p>Christians would be more of a threat than street thugs if I tried to ban religion.</p><p>It's stating the obvious here....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And Bikers would be more of a threat to me than terrorist if I tried to outlaw motorcycles.Christians would be more of a threat than street thugs if I tried to ban religion.It 's stating the obvious here... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And Bikers would be more of a threat to me than terrorist if I tried to outlaw motorcycles.Christians would be more of a threat than street thugs if I tried to ban religion.It's stating the obvious here....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159206</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>godless dave</author>
	<datestamp>1266353280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because he's a public office holder. To the modern press, any elected official is automatically credible, even if he or she has been caught lying in the past. This is known as "balanced journalism".

And no, it doesn't make any sense.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because he 's a public office holder .
To the modern press , any elected official is automatically credible , even if he or she has been caught lying in the past .
This is known as " balanced journalism " .
And no , it does n't make any sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because he's a public office holder.
To the modern press, any elected official is automatically credible, even if he or she has been caught lying in the past.
This is known as "balanced journalism".
And no, it doesn't make any sense.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31164686</id>
	<title>Now the bikies are mad...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266340800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Enjoy:</p><p>http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/in-depth/bikies-plan-to-ride-on-polling-booths/story-fn2sdwup-1225831112809</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Enjoy : http : //www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/in-depth/bikies-plan-to-ride-on-polling-booths/story-fn2sdwup-1225831112809</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Enjoy:http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/in-depth/bikies-plan-to-ride-on-polling-booths/story-fn2sdwup-1225831112809</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161376</id>
	<title>Re:Veto?</title>
	<author>Falconhell</author>
	<datestamp>1266320040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a STATE AG, and for the relevant changes the approval of all the states AG is required.</p><p>Atkinson is the holdout.</p><p>He is the darling of the Right faction of the Labor<br>party, which confusingly used to be left wing before they sold out.</p><p>Please note in au liberals are the conservative party!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a STATE AG , and for the relevant changes the approval of all the states AG is required.Atkinson is the holdout.He is the darling of the Right faction of the Laborparty , which confusingly used to be left wing before they sold out.Please note in au liberals are the conservative party !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a STATE AG, and for the relevant changes the approval of all the states AG is required.Atkinson is the holdout.He is the darling of the Right faction of the Laborparty, which confusingly used to be left wing before they sold out.Please note in au liberals are the conservative party!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159042</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1266352560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More to the point, why does a threat from one gamer automatically mean that gamers in general are more threatening?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More to the point , why does a threat from one gamer automatically mean that gamers in general are more threatening ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More to the point, why does a threat from one gamer automatically mean that gamers in general are more threatening?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162610</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>smash</author>
	<datestamp>1266326580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The "threatening note" was probably some educated adult complaining in a letter they knew would actually get *to him* about the way he is treating the majority of gamers like children.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The " threatening note " was probably some educated adult complaining in a letter they knew would actually get * to him * about the way he is treating the majority of gamers like children .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "threatening note" was probably some educated adult complaining in a letter they knew would actually get *to him* about the way he is treating the majority of gamers like children.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266350100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't disagree that he's a whackjob.  But if people bothered to RTFA (wishful thinking on my part)...<br> <br>Atkinson's got very vocal opposition among biker gangs and gamers.<br> <br>The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night.  No biker has done that.<br> <br>Put yourself in the same situation.  What would you consider a more present threat to your safety -- a set of organizations who is opposing you politically (the biker gangs are putting forward their own candidate to run against him), or a set of individuals, one of which has made a threat, in writing, at your home?<br> <br>Context is everything.  The submitter, the editor, and all of the early posters like yourself should do yourselves a favor and (1) read the fucking quote before misattributing words to someone and (2) understand the context in which those words were said.<br> <br>I'm addicted to slashdot, obviously so if you see my post history.  But I'm sick of it becoming the geek tab of fark.</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't disagree that he 's a whackjob .
But if people bothered to RTFA ( wishful thinking on my part ) ... Atkinson 's got very vocal opposition among biker gangs and gamers .
The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night .
No biker has done that .
Put yourself in the same situation .
What would you consider a more present threat to your safety -- a set of organizations who is opposing you politically ( the biker gangs are putting forward their own candidate to run against him ) , or a set of individuals , one of which has made a threat , in writing , at your home ?
Context is everything .
The submitter , the editor , and all of the early posters like yourself should do yourselves a favor and ( 1 ) read the fucking quote before misattributing words to someone and ( 2 ) understand the context in which those words were said .
I 'm addicted to slashdot , obviously so if you see my post history .
But I 'm sick of it becoming the geek tab of fark .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't disagree that he's a whackjob.
But if people bothered to RTFA (wishful thinking on my part)... Atkinson's got very vocal opposition among biker gangs and gamers.
The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night.
No biker has done that.
Put yourself in the same situation.
What would you consider a more present threat to your safety -- a set of organizations who is opposing you politically (the biker gangs are putting forward their own candidate to run against him), or a set of individuals, one of which has made a threat, in writing, at your home?
Context is everything.
The submitter, the editor, and all of the early posters like yourself should do yourselves a favor and (1) read the fucking quote before misattributing words to someone and (2) understand the context in which those words were said.
I'm addicted to slashdot, obviously so if you see my post history.
But I'm sick of it becoming the geek tab of fark.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158232</id>
	<title>Re:Hells Angels</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266349260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He's probably scared of all the clans with names like LORDS\_OF\_SATANDEATH666. Won't he be relieved to find out it's just a bunch of 12 year olds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's probably scared of all the clans with names like LORDS \ _OF \ _SATANDEATH666 .
Wo n't he be relieved to find out it 's just a bunch of 12 year olds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's probably scared of all the clans with names like LORDS\_OF\_SATANDEATH666.
Won't he be relieved to find out it's just a bunch of 12 year olds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160814</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>stuckinphp</author>
	<datestamp>1266317580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you must be new here</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you must be new here</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you must be new here</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31165038</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>simplexion</author>
	<datestamp>1266343080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He also said that someone who lived around the corner from him was made up by the opposition party to post comments on a news website opposing his policies.
He then had to eat his words again and meet the "imaginary" person.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He also said that someone who lived around the corner from him was made up by the opposition party to post comments on a news website opposing his policies .
He then had to eat his words again and meet the " imaginary " person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He also said that someone who lived around the corner from him was made up by the opposition party to post comments on a news website opposing his policies.
He then had to eat his words again and meet the "imaginary" person.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162472</id>
	<title>Re:Veto?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266325680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wow, the AG has the power of the veto in<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.AU?</p></div><p>This is a STATE politician, NOT Federal<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..........</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , the AG has the power of the veto in .AU ? This is a STATE politician , NOT Federal ......... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, the AG has the power of the veto in .AU?This is a STATE politician, NOT Federal ..........
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31165356</id>
	<title>Re:Aussie Jack Thompson?</title>
	<author>talis9</author>
	<datestamp>1266345240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're post is funnier than you realise. We already have an Auusie Jack Thompson. He's an actor http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0860233/</p><p>And for the geek connection, he was in Star Wars II</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're post is funnier than you realise .
We already have an Auusie Jack Thompson .
He 's an actor http : //www.imdb.com/name/nm0860233/And for the geek connection , he was in Star Wars II</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're post is funnier than you realise.
We already have an Auusie Jack Thompson.
He's an actor http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0860233/And for the geek connection, he was in Star Wars II</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158512</id>
	<title>This guy is going to piss him...</title>
	<author>MindlessAutomata</author>
	<datestamp>1266350400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This guy is going to piss himself if he meets a gamer that's in a biker gang.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This guy is going to piss himself if he meets a gamer that 's in a biker gang .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This guy is going to piss himself if he meets a gamer that's in a biker gang.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163034</id>
	<title>More attractive to women?</title>
	<author>R3coiler</author>
	<datestamp>1266328920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a gamer, does being scarier than a biker gangster make me that much more attractive to women?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a gamer , does being scarier than a biker gangster make me that much more attractive to women ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a gamer, does being scarier than a biker gangster make me that much more attractive to women?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160872</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>exomondo</author>
	<datestamp>1266317820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>so the threat of a group of organisations with a history of bloody violence, drug trafficking, murder and other illegal activity is trumped because of a strongly-worded letter from a gamer? And that this one person's attitude and activities are somehow representative of the much wider population of gamers. Seriously the guy is a douche!</htmltext>
<tokenext>so the threat of a group of organisations with a history of bloody violence , drug trafficking , murder and other illegal activity is trumped because of a strongly-worded letter from a gamer ?
And that this one person 's attitude and activities are somehow representative of the much wider population of gamers .
Seriously the guy is a douche !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so the threat of a group of organisations with a history of bloody violence, drug trafficking, murder and other illegal activity is trumped because of a strongly-worded letter from a gamer?
And that this one person's attitude and activities are somehow representative of the much wider population of gamers.
Seriously the guy is a douche!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163630</id>
	<title>Re:The guy's right</title>
	<author>Nazlfrag</author>
	<datestamp>1266333480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is a gamer party running against him in his electorate. <a href="http://www.gamers4croydon.org/" title="gamers4croydon.org">http://www.gamers4croydon.org/</a> [gamers4croydon.org]. This is why he's trying to discredit gamers so desperately.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a gamer party running against him in his electorate .
http : //www.gamers4croydon.org/ [ gamers4croydon.org ] .
This is why he 's trying to discredit gamers so desperately .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a gamer party running against him in his electorate.
http://www.gamers4croydon.org/ [gamers4croydon.org].
This is why he's trying to discredit gamers so desperately.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159988</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>Dishevel</author>
	<datestamp>1266313800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>(1) read the fucking quote before misattributing words to someone and (2) understand the context in which those words were said.</p></div><p>You do realize that both of those expectations would require the posters to RTFA, and that this is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>( 1 ) read the fucking quote before misattributing words to someone and ( 2 ) understand the context in which those words were said.You do realize that both of those expectations would require the posters to RTFA , and that this is / .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(1) read the fucking quote before misattributing words to someone and (2) understand the context in which those words were said.You do realize that both of those expectations would require the posters to RTFA, and that this is /.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158298</id>
	<title>A matter of scale OR politics (or both)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266349500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is really a two-sided failure of understanding on his part OR a purposeful tactic to push his agenda.  Either way is stupid.  First off, to say the gamer demographic in AU is several orders of magnitude larger than the outlaw biker demographic is a GROSS understatement.  So it follows that you are going to get more 'fringe' elements in the gamer segment.  There's bound to be a few nuts in a box that big.  Combine that with the fact that it would be totally in their worst interests for the bikers to do something like this, and of course he's going to get more threats from gamers.  And honestly, he should feel more threatened.  Not because they're going to take violent action against him, but because he's pissed off a large group of people, and a good deal of them may have political clout and means to make his life a public servant miserable.  And they should, because he's an asshat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is really a two-sided failure of understanding on his part OR a purposeful tactic to push his agenda .
Either way is stupid .
First off , to say the gamer demographic in AU is several orders of magnitude larger than the outlaw biker demographic is a GROSS understatement .
So it follows that you are going to get more 'fringe ' elements in the gamer segment .
There 's bound to be a few nuts in a box that big .
Combine that with the fact that it would be totally in their worst interests for the bikers to do something like this , and of course he 's going to get more threats from gamers .
And honestly , he should feel more threatened .
Not because they 're going to take violent action against him , but because he 's pissed off a large group of people , and a good deal of them may have political clout and means to make his life a public servant miserable .
And they should , because he 's an asshat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is really a two-sided failure of understanding on his part OR a purposeful tactic to push his agenda.
Either way is stupid.
First off, to say the gamer demographic in AU is several orders of magnitude larger than the outlaw biker demographic is a GROSS understatement.
So it follows that you are going to get more 'fringe' elements in the gamer segment.
There's bound to be a few nuts in a box that big.
Combine that with the fact that it would be totally in their worst interests for the bikers to do something like this, and of course he's going to get more threats from gamers.
And honestly, he should feel more threatened.
Not because they're going to take violent action against him, but because he's pissed off a large group of people, and a good deal of them may have political clout and means to make his life a public servant miserable.
And they should, because he's an asshat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159314</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1266353820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night.  No biker has done that.</p></div><p>Yeah the bikers will just sell his kid drugs, and give him no warning if they're going to harm his family.</p><p>I'm sure if he was threatened by a clown he'd be wanting to close all the circuses.</p><p>Loser.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night .
No biker has done that.Yeah the bikers will just sell his kid drugs , and give him no warning if they 're going to harm his family.I 'm sure if he was threatened by a clown he 'd be wanting to close all the circuses.Loser .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night.
No biker has done that.Yeah the bikers will just sell his kid drugs, and give him no warning if they're going to harm his family.I'm sure if he was threatened by a clown he'd be wanting to close all the circuses.Loser.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159228</id>
	<title>Re:Well, i guess so...</title>
	<author>dominious</author>
	<datestamp>1266353400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You haven't watched this: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4t\_wqOxKVhk&amp;feature=related" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4t\_wqOxKVhk&amp;feature=related</a> [youtube.com]
<br>
<br>
WOO! HEADSHOT! What? He 'll re-spawn in like a minute...</htmltext>
<tokenext>You have n't watched this : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 4t \ _wqOxKVhk&amp;feature = related [ youtube.com ] WOO !
HEADSHOT ! What ?
He 'll re-spawn in like a minute.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You haven't watched this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4t\_wqOxKVhk&amp;feature=related [youtube.com]


WOO!
HEADSHOT! What?
He 'll re-spawn in like a minute...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161928</id>
	<title>Re:What a tit</title>
	<author>mooingyak</author>
	<datestamp>1266322980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>And while we're at it I'm pretty sure that "Australian politician" doesn't mean paranoid, misinformed and dangerously ignorant jerk"... but I could be wrong.</i></p><p>It does actually, though it means it if you drop 'Australian' from there too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And while we 're at it I 'm pretty sure that " Australian politician " does n't mean paranoid , misinformed and dangerously ignorant jerk " ... but I could be wrong.It does actually , though it means it if you drop 'Australian ' from there too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And while we're at it I'm pretty sure that "Australian politician" doesn't mean paranoid, misinformed and dangerously ignorant jerk"... but I could be wrong.It does actually, though it means it if you drop 'Australian' from there too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163524</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>X0563511</author>
	<datestamp>1266332700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt; Bikers have concealed melee wepons or small arms; gamers don't.</p><p>Stupid-ass assumption to make. (regarding "gamers don't")</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; Bikers have concealed melee wepons or small arms ; gamers do n't.Stupid-ass assumption to make .
( regarding " gamers do n't " )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt; Bikers have concealed melee wepons or small arms; gamers don't.Stupid-ass assumption to make.
(regarding "gamers don't")</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158974</id>
	<title>Its the truth!!</title>
	<author>Xanator</author>
	<datestamp>1266352260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you ever wiped a raid in World of Warcraft, you'll believe this guy, those guys can get really scary, specially when they found out you did it on purpose just to see what the "fear button" did<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P
<br> <br> <br>
Believe me there is nothing more scary than 24 angry players with huge repair bills, and no epic loot.....</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you ever wiped a raid in World of Warcraft , you 'll believe this guy , those guys can get really scary , specially when they found out you did it on purpose just to see what the " fear button " did : P Believe me there is nothing more scary than 24 angry players with huge repair bills , and no epic loot.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you ever wiped a raid in World of Warcraft, you'll believe this guy, those guys can get really scary, specially when they found out you did it on purpose just to see what the "fear button" did :P
  
Believe me there is nothing more scary than 24 angry players with huge repair bills, and no epic loot.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31179266</id>
	<title>Re:The guy's right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265036040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they have, www.gamers4croydon.org</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they have , www.gamers4croydon.org</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they have, www.gamers4croydon.org</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158930</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266352080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is nothing wrong with eating cat.  Just because some countries have decided that they are too cute do eat doesn't make it wrong.  In fact, I only wish that eating cat was legal and common where I live.  Here in Northern California, cats have gotten to the point of being an infestation.  The cat per square mile ratio simply cannot support them all, but people just keep feeding them and letting them breed with no predators.  Maybe the Aussie bikers could give US bikers some good recipies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is nothing wrong with eating cat .
Just because some countries have decided that they are too cute do eat does n't make it wrong .
In fact , I only wish that eating cat was legal and common where I live .
Here in Northern California , cats have gotten to the point of being an infestation .
The cat per square mile ratio simply can not support them all , but people just keep feeding them and letting them breed with no predators .
Maybe the Aussie bikers could give US bikers some good recipies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is nothing wrong with eating cat.
Just because some countries have decided that they are too cute do eat doesn't make it wrong.
In fact, I only wish that eating cat was legal and common where I live.
Here in Northern California, cats have gotten to the point of being an infestation.
The cat per square mile ratio simply cannot support them all, but people just keep feeding them and letting them breed with no predators.
Maybe the Aussie bikers could give US bikers some good recipies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158052</id>
	<title>Well, i guess so...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266348660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if you are a bag of Doritos.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if you are a bag of Doritos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if you are a bag of Doritos.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31176034</id>
	<title>Re:is he right?</title>
	<author>TheCarp</author>
	<datestamp>1265018940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually I meant 15\%er as a joke more like.... MAYBE if 15\% of the riding community were criminal bikers, then you might have a leg to stand on claiming that criminal bikers are a real concern for your family. As stated by others, the real percentage is lower than that (probably lower than 1\% even... though... the number of gang members when added to hangers on etc is estimated to approach nearly 5 million which is around 1\% of the general US population.... so maybe...)</p><p>-Steve</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually I meant 15 \ % er as a joke more like.... MAYBE if 15 \ % of the riding community were criminal bikers , then you might have a leg to stand on claiming that criminal bikers are a real concern for your family .
As stated by others , the real percentage is lower than that ( probably lower than 1 \ % even... though... the number of gang members when added to hangers on etc is estimated to approach nearly 5 million which is around 1 \ % of the general US population.... so maybe... ) -Steve</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually I meant 15\%er as a joke more like.... MAYBE if 15\% of the riding community were criminal bikers, then you might have a leg to stand on claiming that criminal bikers are a real concern for your family.
As stated by others, the real percentage is lower than that (probably lower than 1\% even... though... the number of gang members when added to hangers on etc is estimated to approach nearly 5 million which is around 1\% of the general US population.... so maybe...)-Steve</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159928</id>
	<title>Re:The guy's right</title>
	<author>SirWhoopass</author>
	<datestamp>1266313620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I do have to say that the motorcycle gangs have a better long term plan than the gamers do at this point.</p></div></blockquote><p>I agree. My initial reaction to the article was that the motorcycle gangs are <i>smarter</i> than the gamers. Or a particular gamer. A threatening note under his door? What is the point of that? Did somebody think that was going to make him change his mind?</p><p>I'll assume the gamer was some teenage idiot who had zero intent or ability to carry out the threat. If he did intend to carry it out, however, that is even dumber. It certainly would not convince anyone to take a more favorable view on an adult gaming rating. A backlash is more likely.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do have to say that the motorcycle gangs have a better long term plan than the gamers do at this point.I agree .
My initial reaction to the article was that the motorcycle gangs are smarter than the gamers .
Or a particular gamer .
A threatening note under his door ?
What is the point of that ?
Did somebody think that was going to make him change his mind ? I 'll assume the gamer was some teenage idiot who had zero intent or ability to carry out the threat .
If he did intend to carry it out , however , that is even dumber .
It certainly would not convince anyone to take a more favorable view on an adult gaming rating .
A backlash is more likely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do have to say that the motorcycle gangs have a better long term plan than the gamers do at this point.I agree.
My initial reaction to the article was that the motorcycle gangs are smarter than the gamers.
Or a particular gamer.
A threatening note under his door?
What is the point of that?
Did somebody think that was going to make him change his mind?I'll assume the gamer was some teenage idiot who had zero intent or ability to carry out the threat.
If he did intend to carry it out, however, that is even dumber.
It certainly would not convince anyone to take a more favorable view on an adult gaming rating.
A backlash is more likely.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161686</id>
	<title>Re:ok...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266321600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed, he fails to see logic over and over. Most of his arguments conflict with each other.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed , he fails to see logic over and over .
Most of his arguments conflict with each other .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed, he fails to see logic over and over.
Most of his arguments conflict with each other.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161330</id>
	<title>Re:The guy's right</title>
	<author>Falconhell</author>
	<datestamp>1266319860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone should start a gamer party and run for election</p><p>An group called Gamers for Croydon has already done exactly that. They have denied any involvement in this scare and condemned it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone should start a gamer party and run for electionAn group called Gamers for Croydon has already done exactly that .
They have denied any involvement in this scare and condemned it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone should start a gamer party and run for electionAn group called Gamers for Croydon has already done exactly that.
They have denied any involvement in this scare and condemned it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160146</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266314460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If stupid politicians were not trying to implement stupid laws they would not get equally stupid notes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If stupid politicians were not trying to implement stupid laws they would not get equally stupid notes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If stupid politicians were not trying to implement stupid laws they would not get equally stupid notes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162824</id>
	<title>Re:The guy's right</title>
	<author>SpaceCadets</author>
	<datestamp>1266327720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.gamers4croydon.org/" title="gamers4croydon.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.gamers4croydon.org/</a> [gamers4croydon.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.gamers4croydon.org/ [ gamers4croydon.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.gamers4croydon.org/ [gamers4croydon.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161292</id>
	<title>Re:What a tit</title>
	<author>exomondo</author>
	<datestamp>1266319680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The next time a taxpayer threatens him he'll be saying taxpayers - as a group - are more of a threat to him than biker gangs, regardless of the fact that a \% of biker gang members would also be taxpayers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The next time a taxpayer threatens him he 'll be saying taxpayers - as a group - are more of a threat to him than biker gangs , regardless of the fact that a \ % of biker gang members would also be taxpayers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The next time a taxpayer threatens him he'll be saying taxpayers - as a group - are more of a threat to him than biker gangs, regardless of the fact that a \% of biker gang members would also be taxpayers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161088</id>
	<title>Re:The guy's right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266318780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean like <a href="http://www.gamers4croydon.org/" title="gamers4croydon.org" rel="nofollow">Gamers for Croydon</a> [gamers4croydon.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean like Gamers for Croydon [ gamers4croydon.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean like Gamers for Croydon [gamers4croydon.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163018</id>
	<title>Re:is he right?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266328860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Unless you have lots of contact with a biker gang, or have 1\%er in the family, or have some other factor which makes you more likely to be involved in biker gang violence (maybe you are a meth addict with a penchant for not havening the money?) or maybe if you live next door to a particularly disliked gang member or chapter president, then... really.... what a stupid thing to worry about.</p></div><p>I live in the US, and there is a fairly large biker gang that roams between South Dakota, Colorado, Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming. They spend most of their time raising money for children's hospitals, and doing volunteer work for local communities. Most years they donate and volunteer at the local "soup kitchens" during the holidays, and round up toys for the poor kids, as well as help fund them with school books and supplies.</p><p>There are a few biker gangs out there who engage in rough and/or criminal activity, but to be blunt most of the "gangs" out there are just people who like to ride. And a good chunk of them take off the leathers and chaps, and put their suits back on for the workweek.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless you have lots of contact with a biker gang , or have 1 \ % er in the family , or have some other factor which makes you more likely to be involved in biker gang violence ( maybe you are a meth addict with a penchant for not havening the money ?
) or maybe if you live next door to a particularly disliked gang member or chapter president , then... really.... what a stupid thing to worry about.I live in the US , and there is a fairly large biker gang that roams between South Dakota , Colorado , Montana , Idaho , and Wyoming .
They spend most of their time raising money for children 's hospitals , and doing volunteer work for local communities .
Most years they donate and volunteer at the local " soup kitchens " during the holidays , and round up toys for the poor kids , as well as help fund them with school books and supplies.There are a few biker gangs out there who engage in rough and/or criminal activity , but to be blunt most of the " gangs " out there are just people who like to ride .
And a good chunk of them take off the leathers and chaps , and put their suits back on for the workweek .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless you have lots of contact with a biker gang, or have 1\%er in the family, or have some other factor which makes you more likely to be involved in biker gang violence (maybe you are a meth addict with a penchant for not havening the money?
) or maybe if you live next door to a particularly disliked gang member or chapter president, then... really.... what a stupid thing to worry about.I live in the US, and there is a fairly large biker gang that roams between South Dakota, Colorado, Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming.
They spend most of their time raising money for children's hospitals, and doing volunteer work for local communities.
Most years they donate and volunteer at the local "soup kitchens" during the holidays, and round up toys for the poor kids, as well as help fund them with school books and supplies.There are a few biker gangs out there who engage in rough and/or criminal activity, but to be blunt most of the "gangs" out there are just people who like to ride.
And a good chunk of them take off the leathers and chaps, and put their suits back on for the workweek.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159718</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266312720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I completely agree, the man has no credibility.</p><p>I, for one, can't believe that he could make such an outrageous claim that he is more afraid of a gamer than a biker (to clarify a 'biker' is referring to a bike gang member that the AG sought to place tougher laws against, these lot have been known to commit violent crimes and peddle drugs etc.). The facts:</p><p>Bikers have concealed melee wepons or small arms; gamers don't.<br>Bikers sell drugs and extort small businesses; gamers flame forums.<br>Bikers aren't so stupid to threaten a poly they have no leverage with; some gamers, on the other hand,  act inappropriately, leaving threatening letters that they have no actual intentions of fulfilling.</p><p>That is how I feel about the matter knowing plenty of both gamers and bikers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I completely agree , the man has no credibility.I , for one , ca n't believe that he could make such an outrageous claim that he is more afraid of a gamer than a biker ( to clarify a 'biker ' is referring to a bike gang member that the AG sought to place tougher laws against , these lot have been known to commit violent crimes and peddle drugs etc. ) .
The facts : Bikers have concealed melee wepons or small arms ; gamers do n't.Bikers sell drugs and extort small businesses ; gamers flame forums.Bikers are n't so stupid to threaten a poly they have no leverage with ; some gamers , on the other hand , act inappropriately , leaving threatening letters that they have no actual intentions of fulfilling.That is how I feel about the matter knowing plenty of both gamers and bikers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I completely agree, the man has no credibility.I, for one, can't believe that he could make such an outrageous claim that he is more afraid of a gamer than a biker (to clarify a 'biker' is referring to a bike gang member that the AG sought to place tougher laws against, these lot have been known to commit violent crimes and peddle drugs etc.).
The facts:Bikers have concealed melee wepons or small arms; gamers don't.Bikers sell drugs and extort small businesses; gamers flame forums.Bikers aren't so stupid to threaten a poly they have no leverage with; some gamers, on the other hand,  act inappropriately, leaving threatening letters that they have no actual intentions of fulfilling.That is how I feel about the matter knowing plenty of both gamers and bikers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158776</id>
	<title>Shh, don't tell him...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266351360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>That a bunch of gamers got together and raised 1.7M dollars for charity last year to give to sick kids in the hospital, including two hospitals in Australia on the east coast...</htmltext>
<tokenext>That a bunch of gamers got together and raised 1.7M dollars for charity last year to give to sick kids in the hospital , including two hospitals in Australia on the east coast.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That a bunch of gamers got together and raised 1.7M dollars for charity last year to give to sick kids in the hospital, including two hospitals in Australia on the east coast...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161126</id>
	<title>Re:WTF?</title>
	<author>sharkey</author>
	<datestamp>1266318960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just you wait until Toe-Cutter 3: Thunder Down Under comes out!  Who'll be laughing then?  Huh?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just you wait until Toe-Cutter 3 : Thunder Down Under comes out !
Who 'll be laughing then ?
Huh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just you wait until Toe-Cutter 3: Thunder Down Under comes out!
Who'll be laughing then?
Huh?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158408</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160388</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>F.Ultra</author>
	<datestamp>1266315540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So just beacuse the bikers has not done something \_yet\_ they are to be considered less dangerous than a bunch of nerdy gamers?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So just beacuse the bikers has not done something \ _yet \ _ they are to be considered less dangerous than a bunch of nerdy gamers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So just beacuse the bikers has not done something \_yet\_ they are to be considered less dangerous than a bunch of nerdy gamers?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159110</id>
	<title>Re:ok...</title>
	<author>Mathonwy</author>
	<datestamp>1266352860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"He was later forced to apologise. The animal was not a cat, the incident happened at another location and bikies weren't involved." </i></p><p>Wait, <b>what?!</b></p><p>"Oops, my bad, it was a cow, not a cat.  And it wasn't at my house, it was at the local Burger King.   And I guess it was just a family of 4, not bikers.  But it looked so <i>delicious</i> that I was understandably confused!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" He was later forced to apologise .
The animal was not a cat , the incident happened at another location and bikies were n't involved .
" Wait , what ? !
" Oops , my bad , it was a cow , not a cat .
And it was n't at my house , it was at the local Burger King .
And I guess it was just a family of 4 , not bikers .
But it looked so delicious that I was understandably confused !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"He was later forced to apologise.
The animal was not a cat, the incident happened at another location and bikies weren't involved.
" Wait, what?!
"Oops, my bad, it was a cow, not a cat.
And it wasn't at my house, it was at the local Burger King.
And I guess it was just a family of 4, not bikers.
But it looked so delicious that I was understandably confused!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160730</id>
	<title>Re:The guy's right</title>
	<author>brkello</author>
	<datestamp>1266317220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The statement is dumb, though.  Slashdot might be wrong in their reasons for calling him stupid based on this article.  But after reading the article, he is still stupid.<br> <br>It would be like saying that a conservative sent Obama a threatening letter and then saying that conservatives are more dangerous than liberals. One bad person does not make the whole group bad.  Gamers aren't pro-violence to officials.  Some kid got pissed and did something dumb.  I'd expect an elected official to be more mature about it.  haha, what am I saying, the older I get the more I see how even the people in the highest positions are morally and intellectually inferior.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The statement is dumb , though .
Slashdot might be wrong in their reasons for calling him stupid based on this article .
But after reading the article , he is still stupid .
It would be like saying that a conservative sent Obama a threatening letter and then saying that conservatives are more dangerous than liberals .
One bad person does not make the whole group bad .
Gamers are n't pro-violence to officials .
Some kid got pissed and did something dumb .
I 'd expect an elected official to be more mature about it .
haha , what am I saying , the older I get the more I see how even the people in the highest positions are morally and intellectually inferior .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The statement is dumb, though.
Slashdot might be wrong in their reasons for calling him stupid based on this article.
But after reading the article, he is still stupid.
It would be like saying that a conservative sent Obama a threatening letter and then saying that conservatives are more dangerous than liberals.
One bad person does not make the whole group bad.
Gamers aren't pro-violence to officials.
Some kid got pissed and did something dumb.
I'd expect an elected official to be more mature about it.
haha, what am I saying, the older I get the more I see how even the people in the highest positions are morally and intellectually inferior.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159124</id>
	<title>Re:Bwahahaha!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266352920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a counter, one could note that one typically realizes a biker gang is pissed off about 3 seconds before being roughly introduced to the feeling of a pipe hitting the skull - they don't seem like much of a "threatening note" crowd, more of a "smash your face in and ask questions later"...</p><p>And given that there's no mention of any police investigation regarding this supposed note, is there any reason to believe he's not just making the story up? If he ever gets bored in Australia, I think Karl Rove might have a job for him.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a counter , one could note that one typically realizes a biker gang is pissed off about 3 seconds before being roughly introduced to the feeling of a pipe hitting the skull - they do n't seem like much of a " threatening note " crowd , more of a " smash your face in and ask questions later " ...And given that there 's no mention of any police investigation regarding this supposed note , is there any reason to believe he 's not just making the story up ?
If he ever gets bored in Australia , I think Karl Rove might have a job for him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a counter, one could note that one typically realizes a biker gang is pissed off about 3 seconds before being roughly introduced to the feeling of a pipe hitting the skull - they don't seem like much of a "threatening note" crowd, more of a "smash your face in and ask questions later"...And given that there's no mention of any police investigation regarding this supposed note, is there any reason to believe he's not just making the story up?
If he ever gets bored in Australia, I think Karl Rove might have a job for him.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31198034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159676
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163336
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161376
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31178778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160144
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160254
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161330
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31166776
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31165356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31165038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162936
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31179266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160862
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31176034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31165156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159370
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_16_1656200_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1656200.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158524
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162744
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163800
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31198034
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160242
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158232
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1656200.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158512
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1656200.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158428
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159264
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159058
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159822
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31176034
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1656200.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158418
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161686
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1656200.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162472
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31165156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161376
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1656200.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158330
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1656200.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161928
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163036
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1656200.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158776
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1656200.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31166776
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1656200.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158974
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1656200.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158270
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158554
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161330
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159036
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31179266
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163794
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161088
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162832
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161450
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158948
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162196
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159928
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162824
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161472
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160730
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1656200.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161126
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_16_1656200.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158148
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158450
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159988
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158912
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31165356
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159436
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159182
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160608
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158644
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159370
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159042
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162310
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159206
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159718
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163524
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158930
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160254
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159662
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31165038
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162610
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159372
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159732
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31161006
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159314
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162792
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163954
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160146
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163822
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160814
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31178778
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160144
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163336
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159124
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159676
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31162936
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160498
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31163000
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160388
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31160872
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31159434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_16_1656200.31158320
</commentlist>
</conversation>
