<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_15_1829229</id>
	<title>Comcast Shoots For New Image, Rebranding As Xfinity</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1266259260000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>artemis writes <i>"Comcast is making efforts to repair and restore its 'former glory' by the act of transformation, <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2010/02/13/comcast\_enters\_rebranding\_territory/">rebranding itself as Xfinity</a>.  Hopefully step 2 is an actual change in quality and customer service.  'Comcast will use the Xfinity rebranding to talk up its improved customer service as well as its technical upgrades. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s a lot to be proud of,&rsquo;&rsquo; said Steve Hackley, Comcast&rsquo;s senior vice president for the Greater Boston region. &ldquo;We want to take credit for it.&rsquo;&rsquo;  W2 Group&rsquo;s Weber said such a rebranding is &ldquo;a bit old-fashioned&rsquo;&rsquo; and a new name is unlikely to impress consumers. &ldquo;I think the public is smarter than that now,&rsquo;&rsquo; he said.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>artemis writes " Comcast is making efforts to repair and restore its 'former glory ' by the act of transformation , rebranding itself as Xfinity .
Hopefully step 2 is an actual change in quality and customer service .
'Comcast will use the Xfinity rebranding to talk up its improved customer service as well as its technical upgrades .
   There    s a lot to be proud of ,       said Steve Hackley , Comcast    s senior vice president for the Greater Boston region .
   We want to take credit for it.       W2 Group    s Weber said such a rebranding is    a bit old-fashioned       and a new name is unlikely to impress consumers .
   I think the public is smarter than that now ,       he said .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>artemis writes "Comcast is making efforts to repair and restore its 'former glory' by the act of transformation, rebranding itself as Xfinity.
Hopefully step 2 is an actual change in quality and customer service.
'Comcast will use the Xfinity rebranding to talk up its improved customer service as well as its technical upgrades.
“There’s a lot to be proud of,’’ said Steve Hackley, Comcast’s senior vice president for the Greater Boston region.
“We want to take credit for it.’’  W2 Group’s Weber said such a rebranding is “a bit old-fashioned’’ and a new name is unlikely to impress consumers.
“I think the public is smarter than that now,’’ he said.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31266202</id>
	<title>John Smith Jr 3rd</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265112480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Comcast turned on the XFINITY upgrade in my town last week. This is what happened.</p><p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tg9hRZ-3heE</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Comcast turned on the XFINITY upgrade in my town last week .
This is what happened.http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = Tg9hRZ-3heE</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Comcast turned on the XFINITY upgrade in my town last week.
This is what happened.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tg9hRZ-3heE</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147258</id>
	<title>Re:Meaningless names</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266265080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This called: Geniuses in Marketing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This called : Geniuses in Marketing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This called: Geniuses in Marketing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146968</id>
	<title>Oh lemme try one!</title>
	<author>hellfire</author>
	<datestamp>1266263760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Xfinity = how many times smarter you are than the average customer service rep</p><p>Let's keep this rolling!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Xfinity = how many times smarter you are than the average customer service repLet 's keep this rolling !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Xfinity = how many times smarter you are than the average customer service repLet's keep this rolling!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31158256</id>
	<title>Re:Meaningless names</title>
	<author>cant\_get\_a\_good\_nick</author>
	<datestamp>1266349320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You want to be new, different, trademarkable in a global marketplace.  I can't wait for monster cable and monster.com to start suing each other (both are very litigious about Monster).</p><p>And your namers have no creativity.  So you get sucky names.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You want to be new , different , trademarkable in a global marketplace .
I ca n't wait for monster cable and monster.com to start suing each other ( both are very litigious about Monster ) .And your namers have no creativity .
So you get sucky names .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You want to be new, different, trademarkable in a global marketplace.
I can't wait for monster cable and monster.com to start suing each other (both are very litigious about Monster).And your namers have no creativity.
So you get sucky names.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31150972</id>
	<title>But, will it help?</title>
	<author>roc97007</author>
	<datestamp>1266242280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Ok, so Comcast has soiled their old trademark beyond redemption.  Rebranding will at best buy them a little while, mostly with new customers.  It only helps if you have a plan in place to fix the issues, which in this case are (1) customer service, (2) high prices, and (3) customer service.  How much do you want to bet that instead, all the effort will go into marketing?  They seem to have a basic inability to understand that crappy service is the issue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , so Comcast has soiled their old trademark beyond redemption .
Rebranding will at best buy them a little while , mostly with new customers .
It only helps if you have a plan in place to fix the issues , which in this case are ( 1 ) customer service , ( 2 ) high prices , and ( 3 ) customer service .
How much do you want to bet that instead , all the effort will go into marketing ?
They seem to have a basic inability to understand that crappy service is the issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Ok, so Comcast has soiled their old trademark beyond redemption.
Rebranding will at best buy them a little while, mostly with new customers.
It only helps if you have a plan in place to fix the issues, which in this case are (1) customer service, (2) high prices, and (3) customer service.
How much do you want to bet that instead, all the effort will go into marketing?
They seem to have a basic inability to understand that crappy service is the issue.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31151988</id>
	<title>I've had good experiences</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266253260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been a Comcast internet customer for over 2 years. Their service is expensive relative to DSL, but the throughput, latency and tech support are top notch as far as I'm concerned. Every time I've called Comcast, I've never had to sit on hold, they've always addressed my issues immediately.</p><p>Maybe people hate them because they're a big corporation?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been a Comcast internet customer for over 2 years .
Their service is expensive relative to DSL , but the throughput , latency and tech support are top notch as far as I 'm concerned .
Every time I 've called Comcast , I 've never had to sit on hold , they 've always addressed my issues immediately.Maybe people hate them because they 're a big corporation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been a Comcast internet customer for over 2 years.
Their service is expensive relative to DSL, but the throughput, latency and tech support are top notch as far as I'm concerned.
Every time I've called Comcast, I've never had to sit on hold, they've always addressed my issues immediately.Maybe people hate them because they're a big corporation?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147140</id>
	<title>A rose by any other name...</title>
	<author>Daley\_G</author>
	<datestamp>1266264600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>TFA mentioned "improved customer service" but I can't imagine that any focus will be placed on improving anything, unless it improves the bottom-line. The shareholders get dividends based on how profitable a company is, and my guess is that by changing the name, they're not necessarily trying to conjure up customers, but investors. They're not the ones sitting on hold for xfinity minutes just to talk to some McDonalds Drive-Through Graduate.</htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA mentioned " improved customer service " but I ca n't imagine that any focus will be placed on improving anything , unless it improves the bottom-line .
The shareholders get dividends based on how profitable a company is , and my guess is that by changing the name , they 're not necessarily trying to conjure up customers , but investors .
They 're not the ones sitting on hold for xfinity minutes just to talk to some McDonalds Drive-Through Graduate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA mentioned "improved customer service" but I can't imagine that any focus will be placed on improving anything, unless it improves the bottom-line.
The shareholders get dividends based on how profitable a company is, and my guess is that by changing the name, they're not necessarily trying to conjure up customers, but investors.
They're not the ones sitting on hold for xfinity minutes just to talk to some McDonalds Drive-Through Graduate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147008</id>
	<title>Why?</title>
	<author>ldconfig</author>
	<datestamp>1266263940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why does Comcast screw up everything it touches? I still have fond memories of Tech TV.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does Comcast screw up everything it touches ?
I still have fond memories of Tech TV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does Comcast screw up everything it touches?
I still have fond memories of Tech TV.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147716</id>
	<title>so many trolls - so few mod points...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266267360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I blew all 5 of today's points on comcast trolls.</p><p>Most of the posts are just flames - zero content.</p><p>Those few that attempt to slam Comcast with facts actually point out the stupidity of the poster.</p><p>Three years of bad service?</p><p>No way I would put up with that from anyone.</p><p>Between me and my employer, we have 9 comcast accounts.</p><p>I think I've had about 12 hours of downtime on my residential account over the last 4 years.<br>I think I've had about 3 hours combined on the remaining 8 biz accounts.</p><p>I've never had a provider with better overall uptime.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I blew all 5 of today 's points on comcast trolls.Most of the posts are just flames - zero content.Those few that attempt to slam Comcast with facts actually point out the stupidity of the poster.Three years of bad service ? No way I would put up with that from anyone.Between me and my employer , we have 9 comcast accounts.I think I 've had about 12 hours of downtime on my residential account over the last 4 years.I think I 've had about 3 hours combined on the remaining 8 biz accounts.I 've never had a provider with better overall uptime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I blew all 5 of today's points on comcast trolls.Most of the posts are just flames - zero content.Those few that attempt to slam Comcast with facts actually point out the stupidity of the poster.Three years of bad service?No way I would put up with that from anyone.Between me and my employer, we have 9 comcast accounts.I think I've had about 12 hours of downtime on my residential account over the last 4 years.I think I've had about 3 hours combined on the remaining 8 biz accounts.I've never had a provider with better overall uptime.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31152086</id>
	<title>Re:And Yet....</title>
	<author>Macrat</author>
	<datestamp>1266254520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I still can't wait for Verizon FIOS to be available in my neighborhood.</p></div><p>I keep hearing people say they are waiting for this... Does it actually exist?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I still ca n't wait for Verizon FIOS to be available in my neighborhood.I keep hearing people say they are waiting for this... Does it actually exist ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still can't wait for Verizon FIOS to be available in my neighborhood.I keep hearing people say they are waiting for this... Does it actually exist?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31150580</id>
	<title>Re:Xfinity equals...</title>
	<author>dwillden</author>
	<datestamp>1266239040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have to agree with this.  I have good service with them, the few times I've had connectivity problems they sent out a tech who found and fixed the problem, all at no cost to me.  It may help that I own the cable router rather than rent it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to agree with this .
I have good service with them , the few times I 've had connectivity problems they sent out a tech who found and fixed the problem , all at no cost to me .
It may help that I own the cable router rather than rent it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to agree with this.
I have good service with them, the few times I've had connectivity problems they sent out a tech who found and fixed the problem, all at no cost to me.
It may help that I own the cable router rather than rent it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782</id>
	<title>Xfinity equals...</title>
	<author>aardwolf64</author>
	<datestamp>1266262980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Xfinity = the amount of time you'll be on hold if you call Customer Service.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Xfinity = the amount of time you 'll be on hold if you call Customer Service .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Xfinity = the amount of time you'll be on hold if you call Customer Service.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147250</id>
	<title>Re:Meaningless names</title>
	<author>ShaunC</author>
	<datestamp>1266265080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>WTF is it with this trend of conjuring up completely meaningless words to use as company names?</p></div><p>Trademark law.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF is it with this trend of conjuring up completely meaningless words to use as company names ? Trademark law .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF is it with this trend of conjuring up completely meaningless words to use as company names?Trademark law.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147726</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266267360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They still have customers because there is only one owner of coax in a given area. So for TV you can choose whatever the local cable company is(Comcrap, RCN, etc) or get satellite.</p><p>If you are in a Comcast area you have no choice. For phone and internet you could get Verizon or other local telco but DSL generally sucks.</p><p>I suppose there is FIOS in some areas as an alternative<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... ugh<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... any competition is better than no competition for customers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They still have customers because there is only one owner of coax in a given area .
So for TV you can choose whatever the local cable company is ( Comcrap , RCN , etc ) or get satellite.If you are in a Comcast area you have no choice .
For phone and internet you could get Verizon or other local telco but DSL generally sucks.I suppose there is FIOS in some areas as an alternative ... ugh ... any competition is better than no competition for customers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They still have customers because there is only one owner of coax in a given area.
So for TV you can choose whatever the local cable company is(Comcrap, RCN, etc) or get satellite.If you are in a Comcast area you have no choice.
For phone and internet you could get Verizon or other local telco but DSL generally sucks.I suppose there is FIOS in some areas as an alternative ... ugh ... any competition is better than no competition for customers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147118</id>
	<title>Re:Name change = shame</title>
	<author>Rockoon</author>
	<datestamp>1266264540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>At least you're not *killing* your customers.</p></div><p>
I'm sure plenty of people have committed suicide while on hold with comcast support.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least you 're not * killing * your customers .
I 'm sure plenty of people have committed suicide while on hold with comcast support .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least you're not *killing* your customers.
I'm sure plenty of people have committed suicide while on hold with comcast support.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31154986</id>
	<title>Shit is still shit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266335040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Marketing people really get me.  I doesn't matter if you call it poop, poo poo, feces, or stinky. <strong> Shit is still shit and it still smells bad.</strong>  Whoop ee! lets git out our branding irons and brand them little doggies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Marketing people really get me .
I does n't matter if you call it poop , poo poo , feces , or stinky .
Shit is still shit and it still smells bad .
Whoop ee !
lets git out our branding irons and brand them little doggies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Marketing people really get me.
I doesn't matter if you call it poop, poo poo, feces, or stinky.
Shit is still shit and it still smells bad.
Whoop ee!
lets git out our branding irons and brand them little doggies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146814</id>
	<title>Because it worked so well for Windscale.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266263160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(honest)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( honest )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(honest)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31151318</id>
	<title>better than Qwest.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266246000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I switched from Qwest to Comcast and in comparison, I'm very happy with Comcast.  The tech support, the up-time, the speed.  All much better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I switched from Qwest to Comcast and in comparison , I 'm very happy with Comcast .
The tech support , the up-time , the speed .
All much better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I switched from Qwest to Comcast and in comparison, I'm very happy with Comcast.
The tech support, the up-time, the speed.
All much better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147490</id>
	<title>Re:Xfinity equals...</title>
	<author>nmb3000</author>
	<datestamp>1266266160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is it about current marketting groups that somehow destines them to come up with the <b>worst</b> possible name, especially when re-branding something? Xfinity? Oh wow, it starts with X and has 'infinity' in it!  Pure win! That name is so bad I'd almost cancel my Comcast service just so I don't have to hear it again (to be fair, I've had really good luck with Comcast.  It's only been down once in about 5 years and speeds are usually great).</p><p>Reminds me of the line in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole\_X-Treme!" title="wikipedia.org">Wormhole X-Treme!</a> [wikipedia.org]:</p><blockquote><div><p>With the X, I know what you are thinking. It's a marketing thing. You see, I wanted to call the show `Going to other planets' but research says that shows with X in the name get better ratings.</p></div></blockquote><p>I can see the commercials already: "Prepare for X-treme Internet access. Our X-cellent service will go X-traordinary lengths to serve you!"</p><p>Blegh.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What is it about current marketting groups that somehow destines them to come up with the worst possible name , especially when re-branding something ?
Xfinity ? Oh wow , it starts with X and has 'infinity ' in it !
Pure win !
That name is so bad I 'd almost cancel my Comcast service just so I do n't have to hear it again ( to be fair , I 've had really good luck with Comcast .
It 's only been down once in about 5 years and speeds are usually great ) .Reminds me of the line in Wormhole X-Treme !
[ wikipedia.org ] : With the X , I know what you are thinking .
It 's a marketing thing .
You see , I wanted to call the show ` Going to other planets ' but research says that shows with X in the name get better ratings.I can see the commercials already : " Prepare for X-treme Internet access .
Our X-cellent service will go X-traordinary lengths to serve you !
" Blegh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is it about current marketting groups that somehow destines them to come up with the worst possible name, especially when re-branding something?
Xfinity? Oh wow, it starts with X and has 'infinity' in it!
Pure win!
That name is so bad I'd almost cancel my Comcast service just so I don't have to hear it again (to be fair, I've had really good luck with Comcast.
It's only been down once in about 5 years and speeds are usually great).Reminds me of the line in Wormhole X-Treme!
[wikipedia.org]:With the X, I know what you are thinking.
It's a marketing thing.
You see, I wanted to call the show `Going to other planets' but research says that shows with X in the name get better ratings.I can see the commercials already: "Prepare for X-treme Internet access.
Our X-cellent service will go X-traordinary lengths to serve you!
"Blegh.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147358</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, and Blackwater is now called Xe.</title>
	<author>straponego</author>
	<datestamp>1266265560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wait, so Xe is Blackwater-- the raping, massacring, fraudulent, Christian-crusader, genocidal war profiteers?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait , so Xe is Blackwater-- the raping , massacring , fraudulent , Christian-crusader , genocidal war profiteers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait, so Xe is Blackwater-- the raping, massacring, fraudulent, Christian-crusader, genocidal war profiteers?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31151460</id>
	<title>Re:You know</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1266247500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A couple weeks back, the Comcast and NBC CEOs went in front of Congress to argue their cases on why their companies should be merged. A while back, Comcast went to court to for the right to say (basically) that the FCC held no power over how Comcast operates their business. But when questioned about how Comcast would avoid falling into monopolistic practices, Comcast CEO Brian Roberts said the FCC would keep them in check. Al Franken publicly <i>lambasted</i> Roberts for about five straight minutes for blatantly lying to him. (Here's the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clvqrfq6-Es" title="youtube.com">video</a> [youtube.com]. It's a good watch even if you don't care for Franken.) Now here's the best part. When it was Roberts' turn to speak, it went something like this:</p><p>Roberts: Senator, ah, first of all, our company has been in business for a very long time and I think our reputation...<br>Franken: Your <i>reputation</i>...?</p><p>Franken lets him continue and Roberts basically starts mumbling that he got confused about what exactly the question was about. Priceless. Franken then goes on the criticize the NBC CEO on their past shady dealings. It's a good show. Just sad to think that even with this severe public shaming, there's enough bribing and palm-greasing going on that the two media behemoths will still merge to become one. No matter how intense the negative pressure from the public and lawmakers, these deals always seem to go through to the detriment of the consumer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A couple weeks back , the Comcast and NBC CEOs went in front of Congress to argue their cases on why their companies should be merged .
A while back , Comcast went to court to for the right to say ( basically ) that the FCC held no power over how Comcast operates their business .
But when questioned about how Comcast would avoid falling into monopolistic practices , Comcast CEO Brian Roberts said the FCC would keep them in check .
Al Franken publicly lambasted Roberts for about five straight minutes for blatantly lying to him .
( Here 's the video [ youtube.com ] .
It 's a good watch even if you do n't care for Franken .
) Now here 's the best part .
When it was Roberts ' turn to speak , it went something like this : Roberts : Senator , ah , first of all , our company has been in business for a very long time and I think our reputation...Franken : Your reputation... ? Franken lets him continue and Roberts basically starts mumbling that he got confused about what exactly the question was about .
Priceless. Franken then goes on the criticize the NBC CEO on their past shady dealings .
It 's a good show .
Just sad to think that even with this severe public shaming , there 's enough bribing and palm-greasing going on that the two media behemoths will still merge to become one .
No matter how intense the negative pressure from the public and lawmakers , these deals always seem to go through to the detriment of the consumer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A couple weeks back, the Comcast and NBC CEOs went in front of Congress to argue their cases on why their companies should be merged.
A while back, Comcast went to court to for the right to say (basically) that the FCC held no power over how Comcast operates their business.
But when questioned about how Comcast would avoid falling into monopolistic practices, Comcast CEO Brian Roberts said the FCC would keep them in check.
Al Franken publicly lambasted Roberts for about five straight minutes for blatantly lying to him.
(Here's the video [youtube.com].
It's a good watch even if you don't care for Franken.
) Now here's the best part.
When it was Roberts' turn to speak, it went something like this:Roberts: Senator, ah, first of all, our company has been in business for a very long time and I think our reputation...Franken: Your reputation...?Franken lets him continue and Roberts basically starts mumbling that he got confused about what exactly the question was about.
Priceless. Franken then goes on the criticize the NBC CEO on their past shady dealings.
It's a good show.
Just sad to think that even with this severe public shaming, there's enough bribing and palm-greasing going on that the two media behemoths will still merge to become one.
No matter how intense the negative pressure from the public and lawmakers, these deals always seem to go through to the detriment of the consumer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147020</id>
	<title>Re:bad branding</title>
	<author>Jeng</author>
	<datestamp>1266264000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It makes it harder to identify the problematic company.</p><p>Your friends may talk shit about Comcast, but they have no idea how good Xfinity is, but damnit they have gotta be better than comcast.</p><p>I believe that is the line of thought.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It makes it harder to identify the problematic company.Your friends may talk shit about Comcast , but they have no idea how good Xfinity is , but damnit they have got ta be better than comcast.I believe that is the line of thought .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It makes it harder to identify the problematic company.Your friends may talk shit about Comcast, but they have no idea how good Xfinity is, but damnit they have gotta be better than comcast.I believe that is the line of thought.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148424</id>
	<title>Re:You know</title>
	<author>KnownIssues</author>
	<datestamp>1266227700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Presumably, they believe they've made steps to improve their service and are at the point where their brand is carrying the baggage of past that isn't true anymore. I'm not claiming that's true, but that could be what they genuinely believe.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Presumably , they believe they 've made steps to improve their service and are at the point where their brand is carrying the baggage of past that is n't true anymore .
I 'm not claiming that 's true , but that could be what they genuinely believe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Presumably, they believe they've made steps to improve their service and are at the point where their brand is carrying the baggage of past that isn't true anymore.
I'm not claiming that's true, but that could be what they genuinely believe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31155022</id>
	<title>Great names</title>
	<author>CopaceticOpus</author>
	<datestamp>1266335280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looking forward to the merger of Xfinity with the Sy Fy channel...</p><p>"XSyFynyty"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looking forward to the merger of Xfinity with the Sy Fy channel... " XSyFynyty "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looking forward to the merger of Xfinity with the Sy Fy channel..."XSyFynyty"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147522</id>
	<title>Re:How stupid do they think we are? oh, wait ...</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1266266280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Verizon, formerly known as Bell Atlantic (and GTE)...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Verizon , formerly known as Bell Atlantic ( and GTE ) .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Verizon, formerly known as Bell Atlantic (and GTE)...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147984</id>
	<title>rebranding doesn't work</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266225540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Xfinity will always be Comcast!<br>Xi will always be Blackwater!<br>Syfy will always be SciFi!<br>MTV will always be Music Television!<br>KFC will always be Kentucky Fried Chicken!<br>AT&amp;T will always be SBC... wait... Pacific Bell (and friends)... no.. AT&amp;T!</p><p>WAKE UP SHEEPLE!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Xfinity will always be Comcast ! Xi will always be Blackwater ! Syfy will always be SciFi ! MTV will always be Music Television ! KFC will always be Kentucky Fried Chicken ! AT&amp;T will always be SBC... wait... Pacific Bell ( and friends ) ... no.. AT&amp;T ! WAKE UP SHEEPLE !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Xfinity will always be Comcast!Xi will always be Blackwater!Syfy will always be SciFi!MTV will always be Music Television!KFC will always be Kentucky Fried Chicken!AT&amp;T will always be SBC... wait... Pacific Bell (and friends)... no.. AT&amp;T!WAKE UP SHEEPLE!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147914</id>
	<title>Re:Rebranding</title>
	<author>MickyTheIdiot</author>
	<datestamp>1266225300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They don't.  They can be a bastardized adjective.  "IMPREZA" is my favorite.  It's supposed to be "impressive"?</p><p>Should be called "PIECEOFSHITBURNINGALONGTHESIDEOFTHEROAD-ZA"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They do n't .
They can be a bastardized adjective .
" IMPREZA " is my favorite .
It 's supposed to be " impressive " ? Should be called " PIECEOFSHITBURNINGALONGTHESIDEOFTHEROAD-ZA "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They don't.
They can be a bastardized adjective.
"IMPREZA" is my favorite.
It's supposed to be "impressive"?Should be called "PIECEOFSHITBURNINGALONGTHESIDEOFTHEROAD-ZA"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148274</id>
	<title>Re:Xfinity equals...</title>
	<author>Pharmboy</author>
	<datestamp>1266227040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Try using bittorrent (for any reason) for a month or two, then come back and tell us how great they are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Try using bittorrent ( for any reason ) for a month or two , then come back and tell us how great they are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try using bittorrent (for any reason) for a month or two, then come back and tell us how great they are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31154842</id>
	<title>Re:bad branding</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266334140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looking at the "Xfinity equals" branch of the thread, that's another thing that Comcast failed at.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looking at the " Xfinity equals " branch of the thread , that 's another thing that Comcast failed at .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looking at the "Xfinity equals" branch of the thread, that's another thing that Comcast failed at.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146948</id>
	<title>Re:Xfinity equals...</title>
	<author>pitchpipe</author>
	<datestamp>1266263700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think that their marketing guys have been reading too much Slashdot!
<p><tt>1. Change name to Xfinity.<br>2. ???<br>3. Profit!</tt></p><p>What a great business plan!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that their marketing guys have been reading too much Slashdot !
1. Change name to Xfinity.2 .
? ? ? 3. Profit ! What a great business plan !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that their marketing guys have been reading too much Slashdot!
1. Change name to Xfinity.2.
???3. Profit!What a great business plan!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147456</id>
	<title>Re:Meaningless names</title>
	<author>Darth\_brooks</author>
	<datestamp>1266266040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would wager that part of the trend has to do with trademarking issues. Obviously, Comcast isn't going to rebrand themselves as "Boeing" or "Ford" or "Wendy's", since those are existing companies with trademarks. Coming up with a non-dictionary word as a company name probably lessens the chances that they're going to run into trouble with domain squatters or some-guy-in-mom's-basement-with-an-LLC-who-wants-a-payoff types. I've heard that the trend with new car names (WTF is a Yaris?) has some of the same roots.</p><p>But I agree wholeheartedly with the silliness of the name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would wager that part of the trend has to do with trademarking issues .
Obviously , Comcast is n't going to rebrand themselves as " Boeing " or " Ford " or " Wendy 's " , since those are existing companies with trademarks .
Coming up with a non-dictionary word as a company name probably lessens the chances that they 're going to run into trouble with domain squatters or some-guy-in-mom 's-basement-with-an-LLC-who-wants-a-payoff types .
I 've heard that the trend with new car names ( WTF is a Yaris ?
) has some of the same roots.But I agree wholeheartedly with the silliness of the name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would wager that part of the trend has to do with trademarking issues.
Obviously, Comcast isn't going to rebrand themselves as "Boeing" or "Ford" or "Wendy's", since those are existing companies with trademarks.
Coming up with a non-dictionary word as a company name probably lessens the chances that they're going to run into trouble with domain squatters or some-guy-in-mom's-basement-with-an-LLC-who-wants-a-payoff types.
I've heard that the trend with new car names (WTF is a Yaris?
) has some of the same roots.But I agree wholeheartedly with the silliness of the name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147924</id>
	<title>Re:Xfinity equals...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266225300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And what do you bet they'll say "and now you can pick between two carriers- that's competition baby!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And what do you bet they 'll say " and now you can pick between two carriers- that 's competition baby !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And what do you bet they'll say "and now you can pick between two carriers- that's competition baby!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147890</id>
	<title>Re:Meaningless names</title>
	<author>MickyTheIdiot</author>
	<datestamp>1266225120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>damn.. I need to go take my BONIVA.  I am very impressed with my new IMPREZA.</p><p>Corporate names SUCK.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>damn.. I need to go take my BONIVA .
I am very impressed with my new IMPREZA.Corporate names SUCK .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>damn.. I need to go take my BONIVA.
I am very impressed with my new IMPREZA.Corporate names SUCK.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31150540</id>
	<title>Re:Oh lemme try one!</title>
	<author>dwillden</author>
	<datestamp>1266238740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Xfinity = how long it'll take to figure out how to pronounce this abomination of a word. (exfinity?  zhfinity, hfinity)  no pronunciation I can think of makes any sense.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Xfinity = how long it 'll take to figure out how to pronounce this abomination of a word .
( exfinity ? zhfinity , hfinity ) no pronunciation I can think of makes any sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Xfinity = how long it'll take to figure out how to pronounce this abomination of a word.
(exfinity?  zhfinity, hfinity)  no pronunciation I can think of makes any sense.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31156250</id>
	<title>Re:You know</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266342120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've never had a problem with comcast. At home I have 12/2 service and regularly hit those speeds (and go way over the bandwidth caps people mention). At work we have a 50/10 business line and again, no problem hitting or maintaining those speeds. Latency is fine, no better or worse than any other cable.</p><p>Their DVRs suck, but all cable company DVRs suck, there really isnt a good option there short of getting a licensing deal with TiVo... Which Comcast has and is rolling out soon (see http://comcast.net/tivo)</p><p>I cant say anything about their customer service as i've yet to need to call them, but their internet service is the best I've had so far.</p><p>Captcha: Balance</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've never had a problem with comcast .
At home I have 12/2 service and regularly hit those speeds ( and go way over the bandwidth caps people mention ) .
At work we have a 50/10 business line and again , no problem hitting or maintaining those speeds .
Latency is fine , no better or worse than any other cable.Their DVRs suck , but all cable company DVRs suck , there really isnt a good option there short of getting a licensing deal with TiVo... Which Comcast has and is rolling out soon ( see http : //comcast.net/tivo ) I cant say anything about their customer service as i 've yet to need to call them , but their internet service is the best I 've had so far.Captcha : Balance</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've never had a problem with comcast.
At home I have 12/2 service and regularly hit those speeds (and go way over the bandwidth caps people mention).
At work we have a 50/10 business line and again, no problem hitting or maintaining those speeds.
Latency is fine, no better or worse than any other cable.Their DVRs suck, but all cable company DVRs suck, there really isnt a good option there short of getting a licensing deal with TiVo... Which Comcast has and is rolling out soon (see http://comcast.net/tivo)I cant say anything about their customer service as i've yet to need to call them, but their internet service is the best I've had so far.Captcha: Balance</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31152470</id>
	<title>Generation X marketing does not work anymore.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266258840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Putting X in front of something ceased to be a good hook the moment Harold and Kumar ran across those X! treme!!!! dudes in their movie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Putting X in front of something ceased to be a good hook the moment Harold and Kumar ran across those X !
treme ! ! ! ! dudes in their movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Putting X in front of something ceased to be a good hook the moment Harold and Kumar ran across those X!
treme!!!! dudes in their movie.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147948</id>
	<title>Shakespear wrote ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266225420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That which we call a rose By any other word would smell as sweet.

Rephrasing: That which we call Comcast By any other word would smell as bad.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That which we call a rose By any other word would smell as sweet .
Rephrasing : That which we call Comcast By any other word would smell as bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That which we call a rose By any other word would smell as sweet.
Rephrasing: That which we call Comcast By any other word would smell as bad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31149642</id>
	<title>Re:Xfinity equals...</title>
	<author>HermMunster</author>
	<datestamp>1266233400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My only response has to be, must be, and is:  it isn't going to work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My only response has to be , must be , and is : it is n't going to work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My only response has to be, must be, and is:  it isn't going to work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31152334</id>
	<title>Re:bad branding</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266257520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Comcrap Xshittily</htmltext>
<tokenext>Comcrap Xshittily</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Comcrap Xshittily</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147778</id>
	<title>Re:bad branding</title>
	<author>mcfatboy93</author>
	<datestamp>1266224520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wouldn't the "Re-branding" process require them to tell EVERYONE that they are changing their name.  so when you talk shit about comcast and then a commercial comes on telling you that they are now called Xfinity, sorta defeats the purpose of re-branding, don't ya think.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>would n't the " Re-branding " process require them to tell EVERYONE that they are changing their name .
so when you talk shit about comcast and then a commercial comes on telling you that they are now called Xfinity , sorta defeats the purpose of re-branding , do n't ya think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wouldn't the "Re-branding" process require them to tell EVERYONE that they are changing their name.
so when you talk shit about comcast and then a commercial comes on telling you that they are now called Xfinity, sorta defeats the purpose of re-branding, don't ya think.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147630</id>
	<title>"Douchefinity" was taken, I guess...</title>
	<author>spywhere</author>
	<datestamp>1266266880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>... and a pr0n site probably owns "Assfinity."</htmltext>
<tokenext>... and a pr0n site probably owns " Assfinity .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... and a pr0n site probably owns "Assfinity.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147554</id>
	<title>Procrastination FTW</title>
	<author>Leebert</author>
	<datestamp>1266266520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I *knew* there was a reason I hadn't changed the tab on my filing folder filled with Comcast bills that is currently labeled:  "Adelphia"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I * knew * there was a reason I had n't changed the tab on my filing folder filled with Comcast bills that is currently labeled : " Adelphia "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I *knew* there was a reason I hadn't changed the tab on my filing folder filled with Comcast bills that is currently labeled:  "Adelphia"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147788</id>
	<title>If you can't change the quality..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266224520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...change the name.<br>
&nbsp; <br>It will only cost you a bunch of millions to rebrand, then when you figure out that you just screwed up, it will cost you a bunch of millions to change your brand back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...change the name .
  It will only cost you a bunch of millions to rebrand , then when you figure out that you just screwed up , it will cost you a bunch of millions to change your brand back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...change the name.
  It will only cost you a bunch of millions to rebrand, then when you figure out that you just screwed up, it will cost you a bunch of millions to change your brand back.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147762</id>
	<title>Re:You know</title>
	<author>Fallon</author>
	<datestamp>1266224400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As a Comcast customer here in Colorado Springs, I can't disagree more.<br><br>The sum total for Internet or TV outages over the past year has been maybe an hour combined.<br><br>The only problem we had was when we picked up our HD-DVR. I plugged it in and it didn't play nice with the HDMI out. Comcast guy showed up the next day looked at it, replaced it with one that worked &amp; gave us a handful of premium channels for a bit as an I'm sorry. I'm pretty happy with the DVR too.<br><br>The only other legitimate interaction with support I've had was when I bought &amp; hooked up a new modem, then replaced that with a DOCSIS 3.0 modem I bought here recently. Those calls went reasonably quick &amp; were mostly us waiting for the dam modems to reboot &amp; acquire settings or reading off serial numbers.<br><br>I'd love to rag on Comcast for being crappy, but at least here in the Springs they aren't. I've been living overseas for the past decade on satelite with 700ms+ pings and often 18+ people sharing 256kbps down &amp; 128kbs up, so I know what crappy erratic connections are like.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a Comcast customer here in Colorado Springs , I ca n't disagree more.The sum total for Internet or TV outages over the past year has been maybe an hour combined.The only problem we had was when we picked up our HD-DVR .
I plugged it in and it did n't play nice with the HDMI out .
Comcast guy showed up the next day looked at it , replaced it with one that worked &amp; gave us a handful of premium channels for a bit as an I 'm sorry .
I 'm pretty happy with the DVR too.The only other legitimate interaction with support I 've had was when I bought &amp; hooked up a new modem , then replaced that with a DOCSIS 3.0 modem I bought here recently .
Those calls went reasonably quick &amp; were mostly us waiting for the dam modems to reboot &amp; acquire settings or reading off serial numbers.I 'd love to rag on Comcast for being crappy , but at least here in the Springs they are n't .
I 've been living overseas for the past decade on satelite with 700ms + pings and often 18 + people sharing 256kbps down &amp; 128kbs up , so I know what crappy erratic connections are like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a Comcast customer here in Colorado Springs, I can't disagree more.The sum total for Internet or TV outages over the past year has been maybe an hour combined.The only problem we had was when we picked up our HD-DVR.
I plugged it in and it didn't play nice with the HDMI out.
Comcast guy showed up the next day looked at it, replaced it with one that worked &amp; gave us a handful of premium channels for a bit as an I'm sorry.
I'm pretty happy with the DVR too.The only other legitimate interaction with support I've had was when I bought &amp; hooked up a new modem, then replaced that with a DOCSIS 3.0 modem I bought here recently.
Those calls went reasonably quick &amp; were mostly us waiting for the dam modems to reboot &amp; acquire settings or reading off serial numbers.I'd love to rag on Comcast for being crappy, but at least here in the Springs they aren't.
I've been living overseas for the past decade on satelite with 700ms+ pings and often 18+ people sharing 256kbps down &amp; 128kbs up, so I know what crappy erratic connections are like.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147704</id>
	<title>Training</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266267300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope this rebranding and shiny new Customer Service comes with training for your install techs. My RCN was disconnected by one of your jokers during a neighbor's Comcast install and your untrained monkey couldn't figure out what he did wrong. I had to show him his mistake (thankfully I was home at the time). Then he did it again 2 hours later. His excuse? "This building is confyooosin." Uhm. There are 4 units in the joint and only two hookups in the area where he was working. Shameful!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope this rebranding and shiny new Customer Service comes with training for your install techs .
My RCN was disconnected by one of your jokers during a neighbor 's Comcast install and your untrained monkey could n't figure out what he did wrong .
I had to show him his mistake ( thankfully I was home at the time ) .
Then he did it again 2 hours later .
His excuse ?
" This building is confyooosin .
" Uhm .
There are 4 units in the joint and only two hookups in the area where he was working .
Shameful !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope this rebranding and shiny new Customer Service comes with training for your install techs.
My RCN was disconnected by one of your jokers during a neighbor's Comcast install and your untrained monkey couldn't figure out what he did wrong.
I had to show him his mistake (thankfully I was home at the time).
Then he did it again 2 hours later.
His excuse?
"This building is confyooosin.
" Uhm.
There are 4 units in the joint and only two hookups in the area where he was working.
Shameful!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147404</id>
	<title>Re:bad branding</title>
	<author>Glendale2x</author>
	<datestamp>1266265800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They probably just want a name that angry customers can't tweak into something negative as easily as "Comcast" becomes "Comcrap" or "Crapcast".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They probably just want a name that angry customers ca n't tweak into something negative as easily as " Comcast " becomes " Comcrap " or " Crapcast " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They probably just want a name that angry customers can't tweak into something negative as easily as "Comcast" becomes "Comcrap" or "Crapcast".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146806</id>
	<title>And Yet....</title>
	<author>GabriellaKat</author>
	<datestamp>1266263100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I still can't wait for Verizon FIOS to be available in my neighborhood. I loathe Comcast. Its not just that their internet service is shoddy, but even my TV service has shown visual lag and dropping way too often.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I still ca n't wait for Verizon FIOS to be available in my neighborhood .
I loathe Comcast .
Its not just that their internet service is shoddy , but even my TV service has shown visual lag and dropping way too often .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still can't wait for Verizon FIOS to be available in my neighborhood.
I loathe Comcast.
Its not just that their internet service is shoddy, but even my TV service has shown visual lag and dropping way too often.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147002</id>
	<title>Comcast doesn't get it</title>
	<author>Peter Simpson</author>
	<datestamp>1266263940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Called them a few weeks ago, to complain that, for the past two mornings, both my cable TV and internet were out. It had been single digit cold, and everything came back on when the sun warmed things up.  They said they'd need to send a truck to my house. I told them I wouldn't be home, but they should probably just log the call and wait for my neighbors to complain before sending some one to my house. (I was reasonably sure the problem was not just mine, as my cable TV and internet come in on different cables, and service has been essentially uninterrupted for the 15 years I have lived in the house).</p><p>The guy's answer was: "If you don't allow us to send a truck to your house, the call won't even go into the system"</p><p>When I came home a few hours later, I saw a Comcast truck in my neighbor's driveway.  No problems with either cable or internet since.</p><p>Clueless...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Called them a few weeks ago , to complain that , for the past two mornings , both my cable TV and internet were out .
It had been single digit cold , and everything came back on when the sun warmed things up .
They said they 'd need to send a truck to my house .
I told them I would n't be home , but they should probably just log the call and wait for my neighbors to complain before sending some one to my house .
( I was reasonably sure the problem was not just mine , as my cable TV and internet come in on different cables , and service has been essentially uninterrupted for the 15 years I have lived in the house ) .The guy 's answer was : " If you do n't allow us to send a truck to your house , the call wo n't even go into the system " When I came home a few hours later , I saw a Comcast truck in my neighbor 's driveway .
No problems with either cable or internet since.Clueless.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Called them a few weeks ago, to complain that, for the past two mornings, both my cable TV and internet were out.
It had been single digit cold, and everything came back on when the sun warmed things up.
They said they'd need to send a truck to my house.
I told them I wouldn't be home, but they should probably just log the call and wait for my neighbors to complain before sending some one to my house.
(I was reasonably sure the problem was not just mine, as my cable TV and internet come in on different cables, and service has been essentially uninterrupted for the 15 years I have lived in the house).The guy's answer was: "If you don't allow us to send a truck to your house, the call won't even go into the system"When I came home a few hours later, I saw a Comcast truck in my neighbor's driveway.
No problems with either cable or internet since.Clueless...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147482</id>
	<title>I just dropped their service</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266266160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>... so does that make me an XCustomer?</htmltext>
<tokenext>... so does that make me an XCustomer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... so does that make me an XCustomer?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146950</id>
	<title>It's Xfinitytastic! - and how to rebrand well</title>
	<author>davidwr</author>
	<datestamp>1266263700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"It's Xfinitytastic!"  OK, someone had to say it.<br>--</p><p>Want to rebrand your image?</p><p>0) Halt or scale back marketing.<br>1) Fix your problems.<br>2) Wait until people notice.<br>3) Resume normal level of marketing.</p><p>If you must market between steps 0 and 3, be apologetic about it, like Toyota's current "we're sorry" ads.  The marketing budget during this time should be a small fraction of the amount you are spending on step 2.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" It 's Xfinitytastic !
" OK , someone had to say it.--Want to rebrand your image ? 0 ) Halt or scale back marketing.1 ) Fix your problems.2 ) Wait until people notice.3 ) Resume normal level of marketing.If you must market between steps 0 and 3 , be apologetic about it , like Toyota 's current " we 're sorry " ads .
The marketing budget during this time should be a small fraction of the amount you are spending on step 2 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It's Xfinitytastic!
"  OK, someone had to say it.--Want to rebrand your image?0) Halt or scale back marketing.1) Fix your problems.2) Wait until people notice.3) Resume normal level of marketing.If you must market between steps 0 and 3, be apologetic about it, like Toyota's current "we're sorry" ads.
The marketing budget during this time should be a small fraction of the amount you are spending on step 2.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31149696</id>
	<title>Re:Meaningless names</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266233580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>So, definitely a good name change for them.</i> <br>Of course it was. Changing your name to Y to emphasize that you are not X, but rather a distinct entity, works a lot better when you are, in fact, not X.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , definitely a good name change for them .
Of course it was .
Changing your name to Y to emphasize that you are not X , but rather a distinct entity , works a lot better when you are , in fact , not X .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, definitely a good name change for them.
Of course it was.
Changing your name to Y to emphasize that you are not X, but rather a distinct entity, works a lot better when you are, in fact, not X.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147204</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147174</id>
	<title>What's in a name</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266264780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Spending millions on a name that resembles a pornographic version of Buzz Lightyear's favourite saying can't be good for that bottom line.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Spending millions on a name that resembles a pornographic version of Buzz Lightyear 's favourite saying ca n't be good for that bottom line .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spending millions on a name that resembles a pornographic version of Buzz Lightyear's favourite saying can't be good for that bottom line.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147528</id>
	<title>Sounds familiar...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266266340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...Dunfer Mifflin Infinity.<br> <br>

And we all know how well that went...</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Dunfer Mifflin Infinity .
And we all know how well that went.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Dunfer Mifflin Infinity.
And we all know how well that went...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31153586</id>
	<title>Ummm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266317520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn't anyone else see the fact that they actually have a "Senior Vice President for the Greater Boston Region" as a bad thing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't anyone else see the fact that they actually have a " Senior Vice President for the Greater Boston Region " as a bad thing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't anyone else see the fact that they actually have a "Senior Vice President for the Greater Boston Region" as a bad thing?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147036</id>
	<title>Rebranding</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1266264060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is there some rule that says all
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackwater\_Worldwide" title="wikipedia.org">rebranded</a> [wikipedia.org] company names have to start with 'X'?
</p><p>On a positive note, at least Comcast isn't trying to hide after killing a bunch of innocent civilians (yet).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there some rule that says all rebranded [ wikipedia.org ] company names have to start with 'X ' ?
On a positive note , at least Comcast is n't trying to hide after killing a bunch of innocent civilians ( yet ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there some rule that says all
rebranded [wikipedia.org] company names have to start with 'X'?
On a positive note, at least Comcast isn't trying to hide after killing a bunch of innocent civilians (yet).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148246</id>
	<title>Re:so many trolls - so few mod points...</title>
	<author>hort\_wort</author>
	<datestamp>1266226860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're not just trolls, Comcast really is that bad in some places.  I've been using a free ConnectionMonitor (from steelbytes) to log downtime.  It went down 18 times yesterday.  That was a typical day.  We've called their techs about it half a dozen times, and none of them have a clue what's wrong.  We still pay though because it's either unreliable, yet otherwise blazing fast connection or dialup.  Comcast still wins.</p><p>The extra sad part is, back before Comcast bought the local cable company, service was excellent.  Our cable modem never dropped out.  We also got better programming on tv.  Somehow, these guys took the same hardware and ruined it.</p><p>I might still fall into the category of troll for saying this, but I'm really hoping that an antitrust hammer comes down on these guys.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're not just trolls , Comcast really is that bad in some places .
I 've been using a free ConnectionMonitor ( from steelbytes ) to log downtime .
It went down 18 times yesterday .
That was a typical day .
We 've called their techs about it half a dozen times , and none of them have a clue what 's wrong .
We still pay though because it 's either unreliable , yet otherwise blazing fast connection or dialup .
Comcast still wins.The extra sad part is , back before Comcast bought the local cable company , service was excellent .
Our cable modem never dropped out .
We also got better programming on tv .
Somehow , these guys took the same hardware and ruined it.I might still fall into the category of troll for saying this , but I 'm really hoping that an antitrust hammer comes down on these guys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're not just trolls, Comcast really is that bad in some places.
I've been using a free ConnectionMonitor (from steelbytes) to log downtime.
It went down 18 times yesterday.
That was a typical day.
We've called their techs about it half a dozen times, and none of them have a clue what's wrong.
We still pay though because it's either unreliable, yet otherwise blazing fast connection or dialup.
Comcast still wins.The extra sad part is, back before Comcast bought the local cable company, service was excellent.
Our cable modem never dropped out.
We also got better programming on tv.
Somehow, these guys took the same hardware and ruined it.I might still fall into the category of troll for saying this, but I'm really hoping that an antitrust hammer comes down on these guys.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146998</id>
	<title>Obligatory Shalespeare misquote</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266263940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"What's in a name? That which we call a turd by any other name would smell just as bad".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" What 's in a name ?
That which we call a turd by any other name would smell just as bad " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"What's in a name?
That which we call a turd by any other name would smell just as bad".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147260</id>
	<title>Xfinity? Sign me up!</title>
	<author>honestmonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1266265080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, Xfinity! That sounds great. Where do I sign up? I want better service, faster internet and cheaper prices, and Xfinity sounds like it fits the bill. It's got an "X" in it, so it must be ten times better than what I have now.</p><p>Can't wait until it's available in my area.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , Xfinity !
That sounds great .
Where do I sign up ?
I want better service , faster internet and cheaper prices , and Xfinity sounds like it fits the bill .
It 's got an " X " in it , so it must be ten times better than what I have now.Ca n't wait until it 's available in my area .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, Xfinity!
That sounds great.
Where do I sign up?
I want better service, faster internet and cheaper prices, and Xfinity sounds like it fits the bill.
It's got an "X" in it, so it must be ten times better than what I have now.Can't wait until it's available in my area.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148266</id>
	<title>Re:its still comcrap to me</title>
	<author>ArmagedionTime</author>
	<datestamp>1266226980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It sounds to me like a vaporware company. Would fit Comcast well.

OUR XFINITY SERVICE WILL DELIVER HIGH SPEED INTERNET TO YOUR HOME 100X FASTER THAN EVER BEFORE!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It sounds to me like a vaporware company .
Would fit Comcast well .
OUR XFINITY SERVICE WILL DELIVER HIGH SPEED INTERNET TO YOUR HOME 100X FASTER THAN EVER BEFORE ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It sounds to me like a vaporware company.
Would fit Comcast well.
OUR XFINITY SERVICE WILL DELIVER HIGH SPEED INTERNET TO YOUR HOME 100X FASTER THAN EVER BEFORE!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147722</id>
	<title>So; is 'X'. . .</title>
	<author>Hasai</author>
	<datestamp>1266267360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>. . . the new 'star?'</p><p>Used to be, when foundering companies relabeled themselves, the word 'star' was invariably in the new name somewhere.<br>];)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.
. .
the new 'star ?
'Used to be , when foundering companies relabeled themselves , the word 'star ' was invariably in the new name somewhere .
] ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.
. .
the new 'star?
'Used to be, when foundering companies relabeled themselves, the word 'star' was invariably in the new name somewhere.
];)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146810</id>
	<title>Let's play the Slashdot Drinking Game</title>
	<author>axl917</author>
	<datestamp>1266263160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Take a swig for every post titled "Meet the new boss..." or "Lipstick on a pig".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Take a swig for every post titled " Meet the new boss... " or " Lipstick on a pig " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Take a swig for every post titled "Meet the new boss..." or "Lipstick on a pig".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148910</id>
	<title>Re:Xfinity equals...</title>
	<author>Fjandr</author>
	<datestamp>1266230160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Xfinity = the amount of time you'll spend dialing because the hold system disconnects you every time you make it through the Customer Service menu.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Xfinity = the amount of time you 'll spend dialing because the hold system disconnects you every time you make it through the Customer Service menu .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Xfinity = the amount of time you'll spend dialing because the hold system disconnects you every time you make it through the Customer Service menu.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147548</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266266460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why do you think Comcast still <i>has</i> customers?</p></div><p>Because they have an effective monopoly in many regions.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do you think Comcast still has customers ? Because they have an effective monopoly in many regions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do you think Comcast still has customers?Because they have an effective monopoly in many regions.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148994</id>
	<title>Crap by any other name</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1266230640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is still crap. And people are stupid, it WILL be effective, for a while.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is still crap .
And people are stupid , it WILL be effective , for a while .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is still crap.
And people are stupid, it WILL be effective, for a while.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147294</id>
	<title>Re:bad branding</title>
	<author>eln</author>
	<datestamp>1266265260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Rebranding is usually done for one of two reasons:
<br>
1.) The old brand is so horribly tainted that it can't possibly be revived.  See: Philip Morris/Altria<br>
2.) The company is failing.  The rebranding in this case is a last-ditch effort when everyone has run out of actual good ideas.<br> <br>
In either case, it rarely does any good.  In the first case, the company will change the name but not anything else, so the bad reputation gets attached to the new name fairly quickly.  In the second case, the company is too far gone for anything to help.<br> <br>
In theory, rebranding can work if it's used as one tool in a total overhaul of the company's culture and philosophy.  This generally necessitates a total replacement of all upper management, which of course almost never happens short of a bankruptcy or acquisition.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rebranding is usually done for one of two reasons : 1 .
) The old brand is so horribly tainted that it ca n't possibly be revived .
See : Philip Morris/Altria 2 .
) The company is failing .
The rebranding in this case is a last-ditch effort when everyone has run out of actual good ideas .
In either case , it rarely does any good .
In the first case , the company will change the name but not anything else , so the bad reputation gets attached to the new name fairly quickly .
In the second case , the company is too far gone for anything to help .
In theory , rebranding can work if it 's used as one tool in a total overhaul of the company 's culture and philosophy .
This generally necessitates a total replacement of all upper management , which of course almost never happens short of a bankruptcy or acquisition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rebranding is usually done for one of two reasons:

1.
) The old brand is so horribly tainted that it can't possibly be revived.
See: Philip Morris/Altria
2.
) The company is failing.
The rebranding in this case is a last-ditch effort when everyone has run out of actual good ideas.
In either case, it rarely does any good.
In the first case, the company will change the name but not anything else, so the bad reputation gets attached to the new name fairly quickly.
In the second case, the company is too far gone for anything to help.
In theory, rebranding can work if it's used as one tool in a total overhaul of the company's culture and philosophy.
This generally necessitates a total replacement of all upper management, which of course almost never happens short of a bankruptcy or acquisition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147600</id>
	<title>Re:You know</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266266700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
I've had Cox for coupla months now and I find it pretty hassle-free.  Call their number, a person answers quickly.  Phone and ISP service work as advertised.  Their website seem bit flakey, but could be my browser setting.  And no surprise in billing so far.
</p><p>
The other option is AT&amp;T for my area, so it's no contest really, but I figure a little 'kudo' for decent business practice might not be a bad thing in this ocean of nasty monopolies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've had Cox for coupla months now and I find it pretty hassle-free .
Call their number , a person answers quickly .
Phone and ISP service work as advertised .
Their website seem bit flakey , but could be my browser setting .
And no surprise in billing so far .
The other option is AT&amp;T for my area , so it 's no contest really , but I figure a little 'kudo ' for decent business practice might not be a bad thing in this ocean of nasty monopolies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I've had Cox for coupla months now and I find it pretty hassle-free.
Call their number, a person answers quickly.
Phone and ISP service work as advertised.
Their website seem bit flakey, but could be my browser setting.
And no surprise in billing so far.
The other option is AT&amp;T for my area, so it's no contest really, but I figure a little 'kudo' for decent business practice might not be a bad thing in this ocean of nasty monopolies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148948</id>
	<title>Re:Oh lemme try one!</title>
	<author>aztektum</author>
	<datestamp>1266230340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shitfinity. Shit for as far as the eye can see.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shitfinity .
Shit for as far as the eye can see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shitfinity.
Shit for as far as the eye can see.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147824</id>
	<title>Re:bad branding</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1266224820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just like Blackwater renamed itself to "Xe" after its employees were implicated in (among other things) massacring civilians.</p><p>Maybe "X" is the scarlet letter of corporate misconduct.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just like Blackwater renamed itself to " Xe " after its employees were implicated in ( among other things ) massacring civilians.Maybe " X " is the scarlet letter of corporate misconduct .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just like Blackwater renamed itself to "Xe" after its employees were implicated in (among other things) massacring civilians.Maybe "X" is the scarlet letter of corporate misconduct.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31154160</id>
	<title>All jokes aside...</title>
	<author>xtheunknown</author>
	<datestamp>1266327600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I never thought I would say this, but Comcast has gotten better. I was getting frequent and repeated drops of my Internet connection and after the initial attempts to solve the problem remotely, they sent a guy to my condo. Surprisingly, not only did the guy know what he was doing, but he went the extra mile to fix my problem. This included crawling under a metal gate to get into the space under my building and going up on the pole multiple times. He found the problem (too many splits) and got the home office to rewire the pole correctly.</p><p>I'm not saying this one event absolves Comcast of past sins, but if they keep on going in this direction, perhaps they will be worthy of their customer's business.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I never thought I would say this , but Comcast has gotten better .
I was getting frequent and repeated drops of my Internet connection and after the initial attempts to solve the problem remotely , they sent a guy to my condo .
Surprisingly , not only did the guy know what he was doing , but he went the extra mile to fix my problem .
This included crawling under a metal gate to get into the space under my building and going up on the pole multiple times .
He found the problem ( too many splits ) and got the home office to rewire the pole correctly.I 'm not saying this one event absolves Comcast of past sins , but if they keep on going in this direction , perhaps they will be worthy of their customer 's business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never thought I would say this, but Comcast has gotten better.
I was getting frequent and repeated drops of my Internet connection and after the initial attempts to solve the problem remotely, they sent a guy to my condo.
Surprisingly, not only did the guy know what he was doing, but he went the extra mile to fix my problem.
This included crawling under a metal gate to get into the space under my building and going up on the pole multiple times.
He found the problem (too many splits) and got the home office to rewire the pole correctly.I'm not saying this one event absolves Comcast of past sins, but if they keep on going in this direction, perhaps they will be worthy of their customer's business.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146846</id>
	<title>Name change = shame</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266263340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nobody changes their name because they "want to take credit" for things they're "proud of".</p><p>Comcast, do you really want to have your name mentioned alongside Phillip Morris<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... errr, "Altria"?  At least you're not *killing* your customers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody changes their name because they " want to take credit " for things they 're " proud of " .Comcast , do you really want to have your name mentioned alongside Phillip Morris ... errr , " Altria " ?
At least you 're not * killing * your customers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobody changes their name because they "want to take credit" for things they're "proud of".Comcast, do you really want to have your name mentioned alongside Phillip Morris ... errr, "Altria"?
At least you're not *killing* your customers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148176</id>
	<title>Re:Xfinity? Sign me up!</title>
	<author>nametaken</author>
	<datestamp>1266226560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Wow, Xfinity! That sounds great. Where do I sign up? I want better service, faster internet and cheaper prices, and Xfinity sounds like it fits the bill. It's got an "X" in it, so it must be ten times better than what I have now."</p><p>Some dick is going to quote this post in a board meeting, citing it as an example of how great the name change is.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Wow , Xfinity !
That sounds great .
Where do I sign up ?
I want better service , faster internet and cheaper prices , and Xfinity sounds like it fits the bill .
It 's got an " X " in it , so it must be ten times better than what I have now .
" Some dick is going to quote this post in a board meeting , citing it as an example of how great the name change is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Wow, Xfinity!
That sounds great.
Where do I sign up?
I want better service, faster internet and cheaper prices, and Xfinity sounds like it fits the bill.
It's got an "X" in it, so it must be ten times better than what I have now.
"Some dick is going to quote this post in a board meeting, citing it as an example of how great the name change is.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147260</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147190</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, and Blackwater is now called Xe.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266264840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I sense a xommon xeme.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I sense a xommon xeme .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I sense a xommon xeme.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31150126</id>
	<title>blackwater started a fad</title>
	<author>volt4ire</author>
	<datestamp>1266235980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Appears Blackwater started a trend when it rebranded itself Xe. Whatever the RIAA decides to rename itself, I'm sure it'll start with X</htmltext>
<tokenext>Appears Blackwater started a trend when it rebranded itself Xe .
Whatever the RIAA decides to rename itself , I 'm sure it 'll start with X</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Appears Blackwater started a trend when it rebranded itself Xe.
Whatever the RIAA decides to rename itself, I'm sure it'll start with X</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147648</id>
	<title>Do companies change names to impress?</title>
	<author>sorak</author>
	<datestamp>1266267000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>a new name is unlikely to impress consumers.</p></div><p>I have thought about this with cell phone companies. I once got service from bell south, and hated it. I couldn't pick up a signal at home, or at work. Odds were that, I could find a pay phone more easily than an area where I could get service. I wasn't surprised when they changed their name.</p><p>The problem is that, now, I can't remember who they became. I could look it up, but it isn't that relevant. The part that matters is that, when xfinity comes to your town three years from now, and your friend told you how much Comcast sucks, and you have been reading blog entries complaining about Comcast's service, you may not immediately realize that it's the same company.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>a new name is unlikely to impress consumers.I have thought about this with cell phone companies .
I once got service from bell south , and hated it .
I could n't pick up a signal at home , or at work .
Odds were that , I could find a pay phone more easily than an area where I could get service .
I was n't surprised when they changed their name.The problem is that , now , I ca n't remember who they became .
I could look it up , but it is n't that relevant .
The part that matters is that , when xfinity comes to your town three years from now , and your friend told you how much Comcast sucks , and you have been reading blog entries complaining about Comcast 's service , you may not immediately realize that it 's the same company .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a new name is unlikely to impress consumers.I have thought about this with cell phone companies.
I once got service from bell south, and hated it.
I couldn't pick up a signal at home, or at work.
Odds were that, I could find a pay phone more easily than an area where I could get service.
I wasn't surprised when they changed their name.The problem is that, now, I can't remember who they became.
I could look it up, but it isn't that relevant.
The part that matters is that, when xfinity comes to your town three years from now, and your friend told you how much Comcast sucks, and you have been reading blog entries complaining about Comcast's service, you may not immediately realize that it's the same company.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147634</id>
	<title>Re:its still comcrap to me</title>
	<author>berashith</author>
	<datestamp>1266266880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so this is another attempt of a distribution channel trying to become a vertically integrated content provider.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so this is another attempt of a distribution channel trying to become a vertically integrated content provider .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so this is another attempt of a distribution channel trying to become a vertically integrated content provider.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147372</id>
	<title>Re:Magnabank</title>
	<author>Anonymous Codger</author>
	<datestamp>1266265620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What does naming their bank after Japanese comics have to do with it?</p><p>Oh, wait. Damn dyslexia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What does naming their bank after Japanese comics have to do with it ? Oh , wait .
Damn dyslexia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What does naming their bank after Japanese comics have to do with it?Oh, wait.
Damn dyslexia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147934</id>
	<title>Sell signal</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1266225360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Peter Lynch, of Fidelity Investments, once wrote that he usually regarded a company name change as a sell signal. If the brand has value, why change the name?  If the brand doesn't have value, why own the stock?
</p><p>
<i>
<a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/931799/000108638009000020/evclk123108.htm" title="sec.gov">Suspicious name change of the month</a> [sec.gov]: ENVIRONMENTAL CREDITS, LTD. (FORMERLY BOYSTOYS.COM, INC.) "Prior to September 12, 2002 and through its wholly-owned subsidiary, RMA of San Francisco, Inc., a California corporation ("RMA"), we owned and operated an upscale gentlemen's club in San Francisco, California (the "Club") under the name, "Boys Toys Club.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...  While our stockholders on March 7, 2008 approved the change in our name to "Environmental Credits, Ltd.," the exact form and nature of any business that we may pursue has not been determined. Our plans are in the conceptual stage only and we may or may not pursue any specific investments or business activity."</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Peter Lynch , of Fidelity Investments , once wrote that he usually regarded a company name change as a sell signal .
If the brand has value , why change the name ?
If the brand does n't have value , why own the stock ?
Suspicious name change of the month [ sec.gov ] : ENVIRONMENTAL CREDITS , LTD. ( FORMERLY BOYSTOYS.COM , INC. ) " Prior to September 12 , 2002 and through its wholly-owned subsidiary , RMA of San Francisco , Inc. , a California corporation ( " RMA " ) , we owned and operated an upscale gentlemen 's club in San Francisco , California ( the " Club " ) under the name , " Boys Toys Club .
... While our stockholders on March 7 , 2008 approved the change in our name to " Environmental Credits , Ltd. , " the exact form and nature of any business that we may pursue has not been determined .
Our plans are in the conceptual stage only and we may or may not pursue any specific investments or business activity .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Peter Lynch, of Fidelity Investments, once wrote that he usually regarded a company name change as a sell signal.
If the brand has value, why change the name?
If the brand doesn't have value, why own the stock?
Suspicious name change of the month [sec.gov]: ENVIRONMENTAL CREDITS, LTD. (FORMERLY BOYSTOYS.COM, INC.) "Prior to September 12, 2002 and through its wholly-owned subsidiary, RMA of San Francisco, Inc., a California corporation ("RMA"), we owned and operated an upscale gentlemen's club in San Francisco, California (the "Club") under the name, "Boys Toys Club.
...  While our stockholders on March 7, 2008 approved the change in our name to "Environmental Credits, Ltd.," the exact form and nature of any business that we may pursue has not been determined.
Our plans are in the conceptual stage only and we may or may not pursue any specific investments or business activity.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956</id>
	<title>Meaningless names</title>
	<author>fiannaFailMan</author>
	<datestamp>1266263700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF is it with this trend of conjuring up completely meaningless words to use as company names?</p><p>On NPR in the mornings I hear about a company that used to be called Horn Murdoch and Cole (a sensible name that tells you they've been around for a while and actually means something) who for some unfathomable reason decided to call themselves "Acretive Solutions," or something. I mean, aside from the impossibility of being able to tell if it's "Acretive" or "Acrative" just by listening to it, what the hell is that supposed to mean? It sounds almost like "Excretive" which calls to mind images of someone taking a dump!</p><p>Accenture, Cingular, Elementis, Altria, I mean, what the fuck is that? At least the idiots at "Consignia" had the sense to revert back to the name that everyone understood and recognized for decades, i.e. 'Royal Mail.'</p><p>Sheesh!</p><p>There's a <a href="http://www.igorinternational.com/press/bbc-naming-a-product-business.php" title="igorinternational.com">transcript here</a> [igorinternational.com] of a BBC radio show talking about this very subject.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF is it with this trend of conjuring up completely meaningless words to use as company names ? On NPR in the mornings I hear about a company that used to be called Horn Murdoch and Cole ( a sensible name that tells you they 've been around for a while and actually means something ) who for some unfathomable reason decided to call themselves " Acretive Solutions , " or something .
I mean , aside from the impossibility of being able to tell if it 's " Acretive " or " Acrative " just by listening to it , what the hell is that supposed to mean ?
It sounds almost like " Excretive " which calls to mind images of someone taking a dump ! Accenture , Cingular , Elementis , Altria , I mean , what the fuck is that ?
At least the idiots at " Consignia " had the sense to revert back to the name that everyone understood and recognized for decades , i.e .
'Royal Mail .
'Sheesh ! There 's a transcript here [ igorinternational.com ] of a BBC radio show talking about this very subject .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF is it with this trend of conjuring up completely meaningless words to use as company names?On NPR in the mornings I hear about a company that used to be called Horn Murdoch and Cole (a sensible name that tells you they've been around for a while and actually means something) who for some unfathomable reason decided to call themselves "Acretive Solutions," or something.
I mean, aside from the impossibility of being able to tell if it's "Acretive" or "Acrative" just by listening to it, what the hell is that supposed to mean?
It sounds almost like "Excretive" which calls to mind images of someone taking a dump!Accenture, Cingular, Elementis, Altria, I mean, what the fuck is that?
At least the idiots at "Consignia" had the sense to revert back to the name that everyone understood and recognized for decades, i.e.
'Royal Mail.
'Sheesh!There's a transcript here [igorinternational.com] of a BBC radio show talking about this very subject.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146944</id>
	<title>The name of the rose</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1266263700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Installing 1Gb fiber to communities will be much more effective than an empty name change.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Installing 1Gb fiber to communities will be much more effective than an empty name change .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Installing 1Gb fiber to communities will be much more effective than an empty name change.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148360</id>
	<title>Re-Branding</title>
	<author>Mike Rice</author>
	<datestamp>1266227400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why does any company 're-brand' itself?<br>What was wrong with the old brand?<br>Finally, does a change in name equate to a change in fact?<br>Just asking.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does any company 're-brand ' itself ? What was wrong with the old brand ? Finally , does a change in name equate to a change in fact ? Just asking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does any company 're-brand' itself?What was wrong with the old brand?Finally, does a change in name equate to a change in fact?Just asking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148770</id>
	<title>xfinity.com</title>
	<author>farble1670</author>
	<datestamp>1266229380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>when you go to xfinity.com and click "buy", you are right back at the old comcast site with all the same comcast services and prices. they really outdid themselves on this one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>when you go to xfinity.com and click " buy " , you are right back at the old comcast site with all the same comcast services and prices .
they really outdid themselves on this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>when you go to xfinity.com and click "buy", you are right back at the old comcast site with all the same comcast services and prices.
they really outdid themselves on this one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148032</id>
	<title>How about the real news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266225780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe an article on how Comcast is upgrading their already over-subscribed service to 100Mbps?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe an article on how Comcast is upgrading their already over-subscribed service to 100Mbps ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe an article on how Comcast is upgrading their already over-subscribed service to 100Mbps?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146796</id>
	<title>Yeah, and Blackwater is now called Xe.</title>
	<author>EWAdams</author>
	<datestamp>1266263040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It ain't gonna help, guys. You're still in seriously deep trouble.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It ai n't gon na help , guys .
You 're still in seriously deep trouble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It ain't gonna help, guys.
You're still in seriously deep trouble.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147968</id>
	<title>Re:Meaningless names</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266225480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> WTF is it with this trend of conjuring up completely meaningless words to use as company names?</p></div><p>As opposed to "Comcast"?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF is it with this trend of conjuring up completely meaningless words to use as company names ? As opposed to " Comcast " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> WTF is it with this trend of conjuring up completely meaningless words to use as company names?As opposed to "Comcast"?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31155550</id>
	<title>As a result, with they....</title>
	<author>dwiget001</author>
	<datestamp>1266338160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... actually improve their customer service?</p><p>If not, then the new name doesn't mean a f*cking thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... actually improve their customer service ? If not , then the new name does n't mean a f * cking thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... actually improve their customer service?If not, then the new name doesn't mean a f*cking thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148042</id>
	<title>OLD NEWS</title>
	<author>Wisconsingod</author>
	<datestamp>1266225900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, This story sounded a bit familiar, the news hit over two weeks ago!
<br>
<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100203-708909.html?mod=WSJ\_latestheadlines" title="wsj.com" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100203-708909.html?mod=WSJ\_latestheadlines</a> [wsj.com]
<br>

The piece of news that is happening is that they started Marketing it on Friday.   Wow... a company comes out with a new ad campagin.... great slashdot news.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , This story sounded a bit familiar , the news hit over two weeks ago !
http : //online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100203-708909.html ? mod = WSJ \ _latestheadlines [ wsj.com ] The piece of news that is happening is that they started Marketing it on Friday .
Wow... a company comes out with a new ad campagin.... great slashdot news .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, This story sounded a bit familiar, the news hit over two weeks ago!
http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100203-708909.html?mod=WSJ\_latestheadlines [wsj.com]


The piece of news that is happening is that they started Marketing it on Friday.
Wow... a company comes out with a new ad campagin.... great slashdot news.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148566</id>
	<title>So exactly how is this pronounced?</title>
	<author>bearwayne</author>
	<datestamp>1266228360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Xfinity.
<br> <br>
ECKS-finity<br>
ZIN-inity<br>
CROSS-finity<br>
OOOOPS-finity<br>
Hugs-n-kisses-finity<br>
?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Xfinity .
ECKS-finity ZIN-inity CROSS-finity OOOOPS-finity Hugs-n-kisses-finity ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Xfinity.
ECKS-finity
ZIN-inity
CROSS-finity
OOOOPS-finity
Hugs-n-kisses-finity
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147876</id>
	<title>Re:And Yet....</title>
	<author>Whatanut</author>
	<datestamp>1266225000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why wait.  You can get free service from google tooday. <a href="http://www.google.com/tisp/" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/tisp/</a> [google.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why wait .
You can get free service from google tooday .
http : //www.google.com/tisp/ [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why wait.
You can get free service from google tooday.
http://www.google.com/tisp/ [google.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147492</id>
	<title>Re:And Yet....</title>
	<author>KingSkippus</author>
	<datestamp>1266266160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I still can't wait for Verizon FIOS to be available in my neighborhood.</p></div></blockquote><p>Verizon?  Sure, that would be nice, but what I can't wait for is <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/02/10/1712200/Googles-Experimental-Fiber-Network" title="slashdot.org">Google's gigabit to the home</a> [slashdot.org] service.</p><p>You know, even if Google itself doesn't roll out to all markets, I really think this could be a game-changer.  Anyone else here remember pre-Gmail days, when your ISP or a service like Hotmail may give you all of a whopping 5 MB or so for free, and we were told that that was a lot?</p><p>Google came along and said, "Screw that.  You get a GIGABYTE."  The webmail world changed, and now, any webmail service that gives you less than a gigabyte or so of storage is antiquated.</p><p>Point is, is Google starts rolling out gigabit to the home, other Internet services will move to catch up.  Not so much because of the immediate competition, since Google's market will probably be very small to start with, but so that they won't look like antiquated idiots, offering a server that is literally orders of magnitude slower than what's available out there to others.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I still ca n't wait for Verizon FIOS to be available in my neighborhood.Verizon ?
Sure , that would be nice , but what I ca n't wait for is Google 's gigabit to the home [ slashdot.org ] service.You know , even if Google itself does n't roll out to all markets , I really think this could be a game-changer .
Anyone else here remember pre-Gmail days , when your ISP or a service like Hotmail may give you all of a whopping 5 MB or so for free , and we were told that that was a lot ? Google came along and said , " Screw that .
You get a GIGABYTE .
" The webmail world changed , and now , any webmail service that gives you less than a gigabyte or so of storage is antiquated.Point is , is Google starts rolling out gigabit to the home , other Internet services will move to catch up .
Not so much because of the immediate competition , since Google 's market will probably be very small to start with , but so that they wo n't look like antiquated idiots , offering a server that is literally orders of magnitude slower than what 's available out there to others .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still can't wait for Verizon FIOS to be available in my neighborhood.Verizon?
Sure, that would be nice, but what I can't wait for is Google's gigabit to the home [slashdot.org] service.You know, even if Google itself doesn't roll out to all markets, I really think this could be a game-changer.
Anyone else here remember pre-Gmail days, when your ISP or a service like Hotmail may give you all of a whopping 5 MB or so for free, and we were told that that was a lot?Google came along and said, "Screw that.
You get a GIGABYTE.
"  The webmail world changed, and now, any webmail service that gives you less than a gigabyte or so of storage is antiquated.Point is, is Google starts rolling out gigabit to the home, other Internet services will move to catch up.
Not so much because of the immediate competition, since Google's market will probably be very small to start with, but so that they won't look like antiquated idiots, offering a server that is literally orders of magnitude slower than what's available out there to others.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31171648</id>
	<title>Christ-finity?</title>
	<author>xrayspx</author>
	<datestamp>1265047920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good luck with all that, X-Bandwagon-Jumpers.  So glad I dropped Comcast, now the latest in the "nonsense branding" war.  ComCast could be shown to mean something, anything "Communications"  "Broadcast"  "ComCast".

WTF is an Xfinity?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good luck with all that , X-Bandwagon-Jumpers .
So glad I dropped Comcast , now the latest in the " nonsense branding " war .
ComCast could be shown to mean something , anything " Communications " " Broadcast " " ComCast " .
WTF is an Xfinity ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good luck with all that, X-Bandwagon-Jumpers.
So glad I dropped Comcast, now the latest in the "nonsense branding" war.
ComCast could be shown to mean something, anything "Communications"  "Broadcast"  "ComCast".
WTF is an Xfinity?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146906</id>
	<title>You know</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266263520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm going to go out on a limb and say that your name is NOT your problem. I'm going to say that your problem is that you suck ass at providing service. You can change the name all you like, so long as your service blows, people are going to hate on you. Conversely, fix the service and it won't be a problem.</p><p>Seriously, I'm amazed how bad Comcast is. Where I live, both Cox and Comcast provide cable service of the TV, Internet and phone variety. Which you get depends on which part of the city you live in. I live in the Cox area. In general, I'm happy with them. They aren't prefect, but they are pretty good. They fix their problems, their speeds are good, etc, etc. My friends on Cox seem to feel the same way.</p><p>Not long ago my parents came to visit, and stayed in a condo owned by friends of theirs. This condo was in a Comcast area. I couldn't believe how bad it was. Not even dealing with tech support, just general usage. The net was amazingly slow, their DVR was a massive POS, etc, etc. I made very little use of it and I found it to be poor quality. I can't imagine how dissatisfied someone who uses it all the time is.</p><p>Rebranding won't fix shit. You have to fix your quality if you want people to respect your brand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm going to go out on a limb and say that your name is NOT your problem .
I 'm going to say that your problem is that you suck ass at providing service .
You can change the name all you like , so long as your service blows , people are going to hate on you .
Conversely , fix the service and it wo n't be a problem.Seriously , I 'm amazed how bad Comcast is .
Where I live , both Cox and Comcast provide cable service of the TV , Internet and phone variety .
Which you get depends on which part of the city you live in .
I live in the Cox area .
In general , I 'm happy with them .
They are n't prefect , but they are pretty good .
They fix their problems , their speeds are good , etc , etc .
My friends on Cox seem to feel the same way.Not long ago my parents came to visit , and stayed in a condo owned by friends of theirs .
This condo was in a Comcast area .
I could n't believe how bad it was .
Not even dealing with tech support , just general usage .
The net was amazingly slow , their DVR was a massive POS , etc , etc .
I made very little use of it and I found it to be poor quality .
I ca n't imagine how dissatisfied someone who uses it all the time is.Rebranding wo n't fix shit .
You have to fix your quality if you want people to respect your brand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm going to go out on a limb and say that your name is NOT your problem.
I'm going to say that your problem is that you suck ass at providing service.
You can change the name all you like, so long as your service blows, people are going to hate on you.
Conversely, fix the service and it won't be a problem.Seriously, I'm amazed how bad Comcast is.
Where I live, both Cox and Comcast provide cable service of the TV, Internet and phone variety.
Which you get depends on which part of the city you live in.
I live in the Cox area.
In general, I'm happy with them.
They aren't prefect, but they are pretty good.
They fix their problems, their speeds are good, etc, etc.
My friends on Cox seem to feel the same way.Not long ago my parents came to visit, and stayed in a condo owned by friends of theirs.
This condo was in a Comcast area.
I couldn't believe how bad it was.
Not even dealing with tech support, just general usage.
The net was amazingly slow, their DVR was a massive POS, etc, etc.
I made very little use of it and I found it to be poor quality.
I can't imagine how dissatisfied someone who uses it all the time is.Rebranding won't fix shit.
You have to fix your quality if you want people to respect your brand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148426</id>
	<title>Re:Xfinity equals...</title>
	<author>Yosho-sama</author>
	<datestamp>1266227700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Xfinity = Because Infinity^x is the only way to measure how badly we suck.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Xfinity = Because Infinity ^ x is the only way to measure how badly we suck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Xfinity = Because Infinity^x is the only way to measure how badly we suck.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146948</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147100</id>
	<title>Re:Xfinity equals...</title>
	<author>timeOday</author>
	<datestamp>1266264420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This was on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunder\_Mifflin\_Infinity" title="wikipedia.org">The Office</a> [wikipedia.org] too!  Remember "Dunder Mifflin Infinity," the brainfart of "whiz-kid" Ryan?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This was on The Office [ wikipedia.org ] too !
Remember " Dunder Mifflin Infinity , " the brainfart of " whiz-kid " Ryan ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was on The Office [wikipedia.org] too!
Remember "Dunder Mifflin Infinity," the brainfart of "whiz-kid" Ryan?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147916</id>
	<title>To Xfinity and BEYONDDDDDD!!!!!</title>
	<author>scottmanning13</author>
	<datestamp>1266225300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Buzz Lightyear will make a fortune.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Buzz Lightyear will make a fortune .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Buzz Lightyear will make a fortune.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147882</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>JM78</author>
	<datestamp>1266225060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because real choice <b>doesn't</b> exist. As an unsatisfied Comcast customer I cannot get broadband or television that competes in speed/price because they have a monopoly on the market in my area. It doesn't matter if the public is wise to it or not. Without viable alternatives at competitive prices I am stuck with Comcast as long as I want the type of services they provide.
<br> <br>
Alternatively I am not at all thrilled about a Comcast/NBC merger and hope it dies a fiery, hellish death. And because its the right thing to do I am confident some jackass receiving a kickback will ensure its survival.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because real choice does n't exist .
As an unsatisfied Comcast customer I can not get broadband or television that competes in speed/price because they have a monopoly on the market in my area .
It does n't matter if the public is wise to it or not .
Without viable alternatives at competitive prices I am stuck with Comcast as long as I want the type of services they provide .
Alternatively I am not at all thrilled about a Comcast/NBC merger and hope it dies a fiery , hellish death .
And because its the right thing to do I am confident some jackass receiving a kickback will ensure its survival .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because real choice doesn't exist.
As an unsatisfied Comcast customer I cannot get broadband or television that competes in speed/price because they have a monopoly on the market in my area.
It doesn't matter if the public is wise to it or not.
Without viable alternatives at competitive prices I am stuck with Comcast as long as I want the type of services they provide.
Alternatively I am not at all thrilled about a Comcast/NBC merger and hope it dies a fiery, hellish death.
And because its the right thing to do I am confident some jackass receiving a kickback will ensure its survival.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146926</id>
	<title>Seriously?</title>
	<author>algormortis</author>
	<datestamp>1266263580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>&ldquo;I think the public is smarter than that now,&rsquo;&rsquo;</p></div><p>Everyone knows this isn't true. Why do you think Comcast still <i>has</i> customers?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>   I think the public is smarter than that now ,       Everyone knows this is n't true .
Why do you think Comcast still has customers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>“I think the public is smarter than that now,’’Everyone knows this isn't true.
Why do you think Comcast still has customers?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148242</id>
	<title>Re:And Yet....</title>
	<author>gtall</author>
	<datestamp>1266226860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't want to plug Verizon but I just switched from Comcast to Verizon FIOS. I'm a Mac person but surprisingly, it wasn't too hard to connect once you learn to ignore the Verizon tech they send to connect you up.</p><p>First Verizon runs fiber up and down the street, then if you sign up, they run copper from the street to the cable splitter Comcast had on the outside of my house. They cut the Comcast cable and connect theirs, so now they running their stuff through the coax you have in your house. They also connect up the phone box they have outside the house (I got the triple play option...TV, phone, internet). They drill a hole in your house and connect up a battery to the phone box outside so if you lose power, you get several hours of phone use.</p><p>They put a settop box near your TV, connect that up and then the network box. The tech they send will know nothing about Macs. They will give you a password you will type into airport. They will neglect to tell you that case matters, in fact they will tell you the opposite. Their password must be entered in upper case and you cannot change it. (Maybe if you call them).</p><p>I've not tested throughput for internet connection but it seems relatively fast for my browser.  There probably are not enough people connected up to test the system under any sort of load.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't want to plug Verizon but I just switched from Comcast to Verizon FIOS .
I 'm a Mac person but surprisingly , it was n't too hard to connect once you learn to ignore the Verizon tech they send to connect you up.First Verizon runs fiber up and down the street , then if you sign up , they run copper from the street to the cable splitter Comcast had on the outside of my house .
They cut the Comcast cable and connect theirs , so now they running their stuff through the coax you have in your house .
They also connect up the phone box they have outside the house ( I got the triple play option...TV , phone , internet ) .
They drill a hole in your house and connect up a battery to the phone box outside so if you lose power , you get several hours of phone use.They put a settop box near your TV , connect that up and then the network box .
The tech they send will know nothing about Macs .
They will give you a password you will type into airport .
They will neglect to tell you that case matters , in fact they will tell you the opposite .
Their password must be entered in upper case and you can not change it .
( Maybe if you call them ) .I 've not tested throughput for internet connection but it seems relatively fast for my browser .
There probably are not enough people connected up to test the system under any sort of load .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't want to plug Verizon but I just switched from Comcast to Verizon FIOS.
I'm a Mac person but surprisingly, it wasn't too hard to connect once you learn to ignore the Verizon tech they send to connect you up.First Verizon runs fiber up and down the street, then if you sign up, they run copper from the street to the cable splitter Comcast had on the outside of my house.
They cut the Comcast cable and connect theirs, so now they running their stuff through the coax you have in your house.
They also connect up the phone box they have outside the house (I got the triple play option...TV, phone, internet).
They drill a hole in your house and connect up a battery to the phone box outside so if you lose power, you get several hours of phone use.They put a settop box near your TV, connect that up and then the network box.
The tech they send will know nothing about Macs.
They will give you a password you will type into airport.
They will neglect to tell you that case matters, in fact they will tell you the opposite.
Their password must be entered in upper case and you cannot change it.
(Maybe if you call them).I've not tested throughput for internet connection but it seems relatively fast for my browser.
There probably are not enough people connected up to test the system under any sort of load.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147792</id>
	<title>Christian symbolism?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266224580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This will only piss off the atheists, who won't like the cross in any form, and Christians, who don't like such blatant misuse of the cross in a commercial context, even with an allusion to infiniteness of G-d.</p><p>"Operation Infinite Justice" was a great slogan, too, wasn't it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This will only piss off the atheists , who wo n't like the cross in any form , and Christians , who do n't like such blatant misuse of the cross in a commercial context , even with an allusion to infiniteness of G-d. " Operation Infinite Justice " was a great slogan , too , was n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will only piss off the atheists, who won't like the cross in any form, and Christians, who don't like such blatant misuse of the cross in a commercial context, even with an allusion to infiniteness of G-d."Operation Infinite Justice" was a great slogan, too, wasn't it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147378</id>
	<title>Re:bad branding</title>
	<author>suomynonAyletamitlU</author>
	<datestamp>1266265680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For a moment, I thought you said</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It makes it harder to identify the <b>phlegmatic</b> company</p></div><p>Maybe if they found a nice, juicy, spittle-laden name, word of mouth wouldn't spread, because nobody would want to say it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For a moment , I thought you saidIt makes it harder to identify the phlegmatic companyMaybe if they found a nice , juicy , spittle-laden name , word of mouth would n't spread , because nobody would want to say it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For a moment, I thought you saidIt makes it harder to identify the phlegmatic companyMaybe if they found a nice, juicy, spittle-laden name, word of mouth wouldn't spread, because nobody would want to say it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147926</id>
	<title>Polish . . .</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266225300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you polish a turd, it's still a turd!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you polish a turd , it 's still a turd !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you polish a turd, it's still a turd!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148084</id>
	<title>Re:It's Xfinitytastic! - and how to rebrand well</title>
	<author>Rick Genter</author>
	<datestamp>1266226080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's Xfinitesimal! Oh, wait...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's Xfinitesimal !
Oh , wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's Xfinitesimal!
Oh, wait...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31149540</id>
	<title>c\_man</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266232980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>shit, by any other name, is still shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>shit , by any other name , is still shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>shit, by any other name, is still shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147200</id>
	<title>Re:Name change = shame</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1266264840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dying of hunger and boredom isn't suicide.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dying of hunger and boredom is n't suicide .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dying of hunger and boredom isn't suicide.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146832</id>
	<title>Next Up</title>
	<author>Looce</author>
	<datestamp>1266263220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>AT&amp;T rebrands as Compu-Global-Hyper-Mega-Net, hoping to shed its previous reputation as a bad wireless carrier.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AT&amp;T rebrands as Compu-Global-Hyper-Mega-Net , hoping to shed its previous reputation as a bad wireless carrier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AT&amp;T rebrands as Compu-Global-Hyper-Mega-Net, hoping to shed its previous reputation as a bad wireless carrier.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147690</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Lumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1266267240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because most of their areas they are a monopoly.</p><p>your choice is Nothing or Comcast,  pick one.</p><p>Ohhh, AOL dialup is still available!  or you can get $299.00 a month dsl speeds with 600ms latency with satellite broadband....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because most of their areas they are a monopoly.your choice is Nothing or Comcast , pick one.Ohhh , AOL dialup is still available !
or you can get $ 299.00 a month dsl speeds with 600ms latency with satellite broadband... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because most of their areas they are a monopoly.your choice is Nothing or Comcast,  pick one.Ohhh, AOL dialup is still available!
or you can get $299.00 a month dsl speeds with 600ms latency with satellite broadband....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147388</id>
	<title>Re:bad branding</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266265740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It makes it harder to identify the problematic company.</p><p>Your friends may talk shit about Comcast, but they have no idea how good Xfinity is, but damnit they have gotta be better than comcast.</p><p>I believe that is the line of thought.</p></div><p>I worked for Some ISP about a decade ago, when deregulation caused huge congloms to form. We'd regularly get calls from formerly independent ISP A customer saying our CS was awful, and they were canceling. Next call they'd subscribe to formerly independent ISP B. I can't imagine our corporate overlords knowing and or purposefully playing into that sort of thing intentionally, especially since the script we read from said to greet as "Internet Service Provider Technical Support." Literally, use the generic words "ISP" Tech Support. And, helpfully, every customer's currently subscribed ISP logo showed up in the ticketing system, so once you got their userID (which you had to INSIST on), you could greet them as an employee of formerly independent ISP [insert-logo-here].</p><p>For every informed customer, there will be 4 who aren't, and probably 2 they retain without any extra effort.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It makes it harder to identify the problematic company.Your friends may talk shit about Comcast , but they have no idea how good Xfinity is , but damnit they have got ta be better than comcast.I believe that is the line of thought.I worked for Some ISP about a decade ago , when deregulation caused huge congloms to form .
We 'd regularly get calls from formerly independent ISP A customer saying our CS was awful , and they were canceling .
Next call they 'd subscribe to formerly independent ISP B. I ca n't imagine our corporate overlords knowing and or purposefully playing into that sort of thing intentionally , especially since the script we read from said to greet as " Internet Service Provider Technical Support .
" Literally , use the generic words " ISP " Tech Support .
And , helpfully , every customer 's currently subscribed ISP logo showed up in the ticketing system , so once you got their userID ( which you had to INSIST on ) , you could greet them as an employee of formerly independent ISP [ insert-logo-here ] .For every informed customer , there will be 4 who are n't , and probably 2 they retain without any extra effort .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It makes it harder to identify the problematic company.Your friends may talk shit about Comcast, but they have no idea how good Xfinity is, but damnit they have gotta be better than comcast.I believe that is the line of thought.I worked for Some ISP about a decade ago, when deregulation caused huge congloms to form.
We'd regularly get calls from formerly independent ISP A customer saying our CS was awful, and they were canceling.
Next call they'd subscribe to formerly independent ISP B. I can't imagine our corporate overlords knowing and or purposefully playing into that sort of thing intentionally, especially since the script we read from said to greet as "Internet Service Provider Technical Support.
" Literally, use the generic words "ISP" Tech Support.
And, helpfully, every customer's currently subscribed ISP logo showed up in the ticketing system, so once you got their userID (which you had to INSIST on), you could greet them as an employee of formerly independent ISP [insert-logo-here].For every informed customer, there will be 4 who aren't, and probably 2 they retain without any extra effort.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148038</id>
	<title>Crack smokers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266225840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Somehow I don't think the old "Forget about our old crap, let's pull the wool over your eyes so the new crap we pull will take a while to sink in, then we can change our name again" switcheroo will work.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somehow I do n't think the old " Forget about our old crap , let 's pull the wool over your eyes so the new crap we pull will take a while to sink in , then we can change our name again " switcheroo will work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somehow I don't think the old "Forget about our old crap, let's pull the wool over your eyes so the new crap we pull will take a while to sink in, then we can change our name again" switcheroo will work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856</id>
	<title>its still comcrap to me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266263340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Xfinity sounds like it should be the name of a sports car company... or perhaps an adult film company.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Xfinity sounds like it should be the name of a sports car company... or perhaps an adult film company .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Xfinity sounds like it should be the name of a sports car company... or perhaps an adult film company.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148172</id>
	<title>Re:Xfinity equals...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266226560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nice.</p><p>Or xfinity could be the time that it takes them to complete an order.  In two months, I will have been on the install list for three years!  I live in Bellevue, WA two blocks from Expedia's new building and four blocks from a new Microsoft building.  It's not as if I live in the middle of nowhere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice.Or xfinity could be the time that it takes them to complete an order .
In two months , I will have been on the install list for three years !
I live in Bellevue , WA two blocks from Expedia 's new building and four blocks from a new Microsoft building .
It 's not as if I live in the middle of nowhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice.Or xfinity could be the time that it takes them to complete an order.
In two months, I will have been on the install list for three years!
I live in Bellevue, WA two blocks from Expedia's new building and four blocks from a new Microsoft building.
It's not as if I live in the middle of nowhere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147464</id>
	<title>Re:its still comcrap to me</title>
	<author>Korin43</author>
	<datestamp>1266266100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A sports car company? No sports car company would choose such an idiotic name.<br>
<br>
<b>Comcast Marketing Team:</b> Ok so the name we came up with was Xfinity. Our research conducted in the 90's says that people like "x-treme" things, so we basically just put an x in front of a word that sounds cool.<br>
<b>Comcast Executives:</b> That's brilliant! Our retarded customers will love it!<br>
<br>
<b>Sports Car Marketing Team:</b> Ok so what do you think of Xfinity? We came up with it while we were drunk and watching power rangers.<br>
<b>Sports Car Executives:</b> That's retarded. Imagine using this pickup line, "Hey baby, wanna see my xfinity?" No one will get laid showing off a car with that name.<br>
<b>Sports Car Marketing Team:</b> Good point, back to spending all of that money you gave us.. I mean research.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A sports car company ?
No sports car company would choose such an idiotic name .
Comcast Marketing Team : Ok so the name we came up with was Xfinity .
Our research conducted in the 90 's says that people like " x-treme " things , so we basically just put an x in front of a word that sounds cool .
Comcast Executives : That 's brilliant !
Our retarded customers will love it !
Sports Car Marketing Team : Ok so what do you think of Xfinity ?
We came up with it while we were drunk and watching power rangers .
Sports Car Executives : That 's retarded .
Imagine using this pickup line , " Hey baby , wan na see my xfinity ?
" No one will get laid showing off a car with that name .
Sports Car Marketing Team : Good point , back to spending all of that money you gave us.. I mean research .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A sports car company?
No sports car company would choose such an idiotic name.
Comcast Marketing Team: Ok so the name we came up with was Xfinity.
Our research conducted in the 90's says that people like "x-treme" things, so we basically just put an x in front of a word that sounds cool.
Comcast Executives: That's brilliant!
Our retarded customers will love it!
Sports Car Marketing Team: Ok so what do you think of Xfinity?
We came up with it while we were drunk and watching power rangers.
Sports Car Executives: That's retarded.
Imagine using this pickup line, "Hey baby, wanna see my xfinity?
" No one will get laid showing off a car with that name.
Sports Car Marketing Team: Good point, back to spending all of that money you gave us.. I mean research.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147740</id>
	<title>comcast the jig is up and I want VS and CSN philly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266267480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>comcast the jig is up and I want VS and CSN philly on direct tv now!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>comcast the jig is up and I want VS and CSN philly on direct tv now !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>comcast the jig is up and I want VS and CSN philly on direct tv now!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148306</id>
	<title>Re:Xfinity equals...</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1266227160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I'm not sure why Comcast gets so much hate. Maybe it depends on the local market you are in?</i></p><p>Yes, this is exactly their problem.</p><p>I'm here on a beautiful 16/2 connection that always rocks.  I've seen a 5-minute outage at 4:30AM once.  It's former Adelphia territory.</p><p>But if you go 60 miles away, everybody who only has Comcast just hates it.  You'll hear similar bipolar stories from all over.</p><p>They seem unable to find their winning processes and replicate them into company-wide success.  Perhaps they should spend more money on business process management and quality measures and less on branding?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure why Comcast gets so much hate .
Maybe it depends on the local market you are in ? Yes , this is exactly their problem.I 'm here on a beautiful 16/2 connection that always rocks .
I 've seen a 5-minute outage at 4 : 30AM once .
It 's former Adelphia territory.But if you go 60 miles away , everybody who only has Comcast just hates it .
You 'll hear similar bipolar stories from all over.They seem unable to find their winning processes and replicate them into company-wide success .
Perhaps they should spend more money on business process management and quality measures and less on branding ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure why Comcast gets so much hate.
Maybe it depends on the local market you are in?Yes, this is exactly their problem.I'm here on a beautiful 16/2 connection that always rocks.
I've seen a 5-minute outage at 4:30AM once.
It's former Adelphia territory.But if you go 60 miles away, everybody who only has Comcast just hates it.
You'll hear similar bipolar stories from all over.They seem unable to find their winning processes and replicate them into company-wide success.
Perhaps they should spend more money on business process management and quality measures and less on branding?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147542</id>
	<title>Crap, by any other name...</title>
	<author>iperkins</author>
	<datestamp>1266266400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is still crap. And smells like it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is still crap .
And smells like it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is still crap.
And smells like it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147830</id>
	<title>Re:Meaningless names</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266224820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>WTF is it with this trend of conjuring up completely meaningless words to use as company names?</p></div><p>One reason: Googlibility (It's a word *now*, goddamnit)</p><p>If you make up a name, you don't have to compete with all the other uses of the word. E.g. think about Googling "install windows" if Microsoft was a relatively unknown company. Most of the hits would be about the benefits of double-glazing, and how to make sure the opening was square.</p><p>I've been trying to learn the R programming language recently, an let me tell you it's a bitch to search for things. "R" is so common elsewhere, including it just *barely* helps refine the search. "R statistics" doesn't help much either, because you get a bunch of stuff about the R-squared goodness-of-fit topic.</p><p>I think the only reason you don't see it for C/C++ is because of the volume of pages on those topics, and the fact that Google has special cased the snot out of them. (e.g. remember back when punctuation didn't matter? AFAICT, it still doesn't, unless it's two plus signs after a letter "c".)</p><p>That said, your point is valid that it doesn't matter how distinctive your name is if people can't spell it - but you get that with "traditional" names too: Is it "Hansen Bros." or "Hanson Bros."? "Smith and Fisher" or "Smith and Fischer"?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF is it with this trend of conjuring up completely meaningless words to use as company names ? One reason : Googlibility ( It 's a word * now * , goddamnit ) If you make up a name , you do n't have to compete with all the other uses of the word .
E.g. think about Googling " install windows " if Microsoft was a relatively unknown company .
Most of the hits would be about the benefits of double-glazing , and how to make sure the opening was square.I 've been trying to learn the R programming language recently , an let me tell you it 's a bitch to search for things .
" R " is so common elsewhere , including it just * barely * helps refine the search .
" R statistics " does n't help much either , because you get a bunch of stuff about the R-squared goodness-of-fit topic.I think the only reason you do n't see it for C/C + + is because of the volume of pages on those topics , and the fact that Google has special cased the snot out of them .
( e.g. remember back when punctuation did n't matter ?
AFAICT , it still does n't , unless it 's two plus signs after a letter " c " .
) That said , your point is valid that it does n't matter how distinctive your name is if people ca n't spell it - but you get that with " traditional " names too : Is it " Hansen Bros. " or " Hanson Bros. " ?
" Smith and Fisher " or " Smith and Fischer " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF is it with this trend of conjuring up completely meaningless words to use as company names?One reason: Googlibility (It's a word *now*, goddamnit)If you make up a name, you don't have to compete with all the other uses of the word.
E.g. think about Googling "install windows" if Microsoft was a relatively unknown company.
Most of the hits would be about the benefits of double-glazing, and how to make sure the opening was square.I've been trying to learn the R programming language recently, an let me tell you it's a bitch to search for things.
"R" is so common elsewhere, including it just *barely* helps refine the search.
"R statistics" doesn't help much either, because you get a bunch of stuff about the R-squared goodness-of-fit topic.I think the only reason you don't see it for C/C++ is because of the volume of pages on those topics, and the fact that Google has special cased the snot out of them.
(e.g. remember back when punctuation didn't matter?
AFAICT, it still doesn't, unless it's two plus signs after a letter "c".
)That said, your point is valid that it doesn't matter how distinctive your name is if people can't spell it - but you get that with "traditional" names too: Is it "Hansen Bros." or "Hanson Bros."?
"Smith and Fisher" or "Smith and Fischer"?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148462</id>
	<title>ComCast customer "service"</title>
	<author>Neil23</author>
	<datestamp>1266227880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A couple of years ago, I moved to a suburb which has a duopoly of ComCast &amp; AT&amp;T.  I held my nose and signed up for ComCast cable internet service.  I was careful to get a cable modem from their approved list.<br>
Two years later, the modem got really flakey and needs replacement.  I checked the web site, and the list of cable modems there is so old most of them aren't made any more.<br>
So I wasted cellular minutes trying to get some semblance of current information from customer "service".  I eventually found out that there is a list of approved models of cable modem which is less obsolete than the other, but I can't have a copy because it's secret!</htmltext>
<tokenext>A couple of years ago , I moved to a suburb which has a duopoly of ComCast &amp; AT&amp;T .
I held my nose and signed up for ComCast cable internet service .
I was careful to get a cable modem from their approved list .
Two years later , the modem got really flakey and needs replacement .
I checked the web site , and the list of cable modems there is so old most of them are n't made any more .
So I wasted cellular minutes trying to get some semblance of current information from customer " service " .
I eventually found out that there is a list of approved models of cable modem which is less obsolete than the other , but I ca n't have a copy because it 's secret !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A couple of years ago, I moved to a suburb which has a duopoly of ComCast &amp; AT&amp;T.
I held my nose and signed up for ComCast cable internet service.
I was careful to get a cable modem from their approved list.
Two years later, the modem got really flakey and needs replacement.
I checked the web site, and the list of cable modems there is so old most of them aren't made any more.
So I wasted cellular minutes trying to get some semblance of current information from customer "service".
I eventually found out that there is a list of approved models of cable modem which is less obsolete than the other, but I can't have a copy because it's secret!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147314</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, and Blackwater is now called Xe.</title>
	<author>Smooth and Shiny</author>
	<datestamp>1266265320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not to mention their pricing. Seriously... at this point, I am seeing an increase in my monthly statement every 3-4 months. Some new charge or other. In the last few months, they've removed several channels from the package that I have and INCREASED the price. This is why people hate them and being in the part of Boston I am in, I have no choice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention their pricing .
Seriously... at this point , I am seeing an increase in my monthly statement every 3-4 months .
Some new charge or other .
In the last few months , they 've removed several channels from the package that I have and INCREASED the price .
This is why people hate them and being in the part of Boston I am in , I have no choice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention their pricing.
Seriously... at this point, I am seeing an increase in my monthly statement every 3-4 months.
Some new charge or other.
In the last few months, they've removed several channels from the package that I have and INCREASED the price.
This is why people hate them and being in the part of Boston I am in, I have no choice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147840</id>
	<title>Re:You know</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266224880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Not long ago my parents came to visit, and stayed in a condo owned by friends of theirs. This condo was in a Comcast area. I couldn't believe how bad it was. Not even dealing with tech support, just general usage. The net was amazingly slow, their DVR was a massive POS, etc, etc. I made very little use of it and I found it to be poor quality. I can't imagine how dissatisfied someone who uses it all the time is.</p></div><p>Sounds pretty Comcastic to me.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not long ago my parents came to visit , and stayed in a condo owned by friends of theirs .
This condo was in a Comcast area .
I could n't believe how bad it was .
Not even dealing with tech support , just general usage .
The net was amazingly slow , their DVR was a massive POS , etc , etc .
I made very little use of it and I found it to be poor quality .
I ca n't imagine how dissatisfied someone who uses it all the time is.Sounds pretty Comcastic to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not long ago my parents came to visit, and stayed in a condo owned by friends of theirs.
This condo was in a Comcast area.
I couldn't believe how bad it was.
Not even dealing with tech support, just general usage.
The net was amazingly slow, their DVR was a massive POS, etc, etc.
I made very little use of it and I found it to be poor quality.
I can't imagine how dissatisfied someone who uses it all the time is.Sounds pretty Comcastic to me.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31150606</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, and Blackwater is now called Xe.</title>
	<author>brkello</author>
	<datestamp>1266239160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah.  Though maybe they can pull a Dominoes.  Our product sucks and we knew it!  Now we made it not suck so try it again!<br> <br>I haven't tried it yet.  Did they actually remove the suck?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah .
Though maybe they can pull a Dominoes .
Our product sucks and we knew it !
Now we made it not suck so try it again !
I have n't tried it yet .
Did they actually remove the suck ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah.
Though maybe they can pull a Dominoes.
Our product sucks and we knew it!
Now we made it not suck so try it again!
I haven't tried it yet.
Did they actually remove the suck?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31149706</id>
	<title>Re:Meaningless names</title>
	<author>KnownIssues</author>
	<datestamp>1266233640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Accenture, Cingular, Elementis, Altria, I mean, what the fuck is that?</p></div><p>Exactly! It isn't anything the fuck and that is the whole point. Those names could represent companies involved in any activity, whereas Comcast sounds like a shortening of Communications Broadcast and implies a narrow field of interest: cable television, Internet, and telephone. With the new name they can be anything they want: pharmaceuticals, space exploration, weapons manufacture, you name it!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Accenture , Cingular , Elementis , Altria , I mean , what the fuck is that ? Exactly !
It is n't anything the fuck and that is the whole point .
Those names could represent companies involved in any activity , whereas Comcast sounds like a shortening of Communications Broadcast and implies a narrow field of interest : cable television , Internet , and telephone .
With the new name they can be anything they want : pharmaceuticals , space exploration , weapons manufacture , you name it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Accenture, Cingular, Elementis, Altria, I mean, what the fuck is that?Exactly!
It isn't anything the fuck and that is the whole point.
Those names could represent companies involved in any activity, whereas Comcast sounds like a shortening of Communications Broadcast and implies a narrow field of interest: cable television, Internet, and telephone.
With the new name they can be anything they want: pharmaceuticals, space exploration, weapons manufacture, you name it!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146966</id>
	<title>Re:its still comcrap to me</title>
	<author>TinBromide</author>
	<datestamp>1266263760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm glad you mentioned comcrap, even my grandparents call it comcrap, that has filtered down from the nerds down to EVERYBODY and they realized that the brand was... soiled. <br> <br>Thank you, I'll be here all week.<br> <br>So how can we integrate some sort of fecal synonym into xfinity... I wonder if part of the market testing was bringing a bunch of teenage nerds into a room and they were like "come up with a catchy insult name for this" after three weeks, they couldn't get any results.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm glad you mentioned comcrap , even my grandparents call it comcrap , that has filtered down from the nerds down to EVERYBODY and they realized that the brand was... soiled. Thank you , I 'll be here all week .
So how can we integrate some sort of fecal synonym into xfinity... I wonder if part of the market testing was bringing a bunch of teenage nerds into a room and they were like " come up with a catchy insult name for this " after three weeks , they could n't get any results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm glad you mentioned comcrap, even my grandparents call it comcrap, that has filtered down from the nerds down to EVERYBODY and they realized that the brand was... soiled.  Thank you, I'll be here all week.
So how can we integrate some sort of fecal synonym into xfinity... I wonder if part of the market testing was bringing a bunch of teenage nerds into a room and they were like "come up with a catchy insult name for this" after three weeks, they couldn't get any results.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31149528</id>
	<title>Best way to cancel...</title>
	<author>Temujin\_12</author>
	<datestamp>1266232920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We dumped cable TV/Tivo over a year ago and now get all of our movies and TV programming via the internet (over the internet connection the cable company provides) or Netflix/Redbox . The best way to cancel to avoid much of the hassle in canceling cable services is to pack everything up (which you'd have to do anyways) but instead of mailing it in (giving them free-reign to claim you didn't send something) drive down to their offices and plop all of the equipment on a customer service rep's desk. They have no way to rebuttal against you since they'd have to tell you to pack everything back up and set it up again and they have no way to "claim" you lost something since they have to give you a receipt right there.</p><p>BTW, I don't miss cable TV one bit and haven't run into bandwidth issues because we don't watch TV all day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We dumped cable TV/Tivo over a year ago and now get all of our movies and TV programming via the internet ( over the internet connection the cable company provides ) or Netflix/Redbox .
The best way to cancel to avoid much of the hassle in canceling cable services is to pack everything up ( which you 'd have to do anyways ) but instead of mailing it in ( giving them free-reign to claim you did n't send something ) drive down to their offices and plop all of the equipment on a customer service rep 's desk .
They have no way to rebuttal against you since they 'd have to tell you to pack everything back up and set it up again and they have no way to " claim " you lost something since they have to give you a receipt right there.BTW , I do n't miss cable TV one bit and have n't run into bandwidth issues because we do n't watch TV all day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We dumped cable TV/Tivo over a year ago and now get all of our movies and TV programming via the internet (over the internet connection the cable company provides) or Netflix/Redbox .
The best way to cancel to avoid much of the hassle in canceling cable services is to pack everything up (which you'd have to do anyways) but instead of mailing it in (giving them free-reign to claim you didn't send something) drive down to their offices and plop all of the equipment on a customer service rep's desk.
They have no way to rebuttal against you since they'd have to tell you to pack everything back up and set it up again and they have no way to "claim" you lost something since they have to give you a receipt right there.BTW, I don't miss cable TV one bit and haven't run into bandwidth issues because we don't watch TV all day.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147072</id>
	<title>How about changing it to "XSucksALittleLess"</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1266264240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More accurate, anyway. At any rate, I'll believe something has changed when I can talk to somebody who's not in India, knows something, can make a decision and can understand words like "I measured the Comcast line signal strengh for the last 24 hours and it dipped to just above zero 7 times in that period for a total of 95.4 minutes of non-functioning internet time so GET AN ENGINEER TO YOUR SWITCH AND DON'T SENT OUT THE LOCAL DUMBASS AGAIN."</p><p>Cheers!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More accurate , anyway .
At any rate , I 'll believe something has changed when I can talk to somebody who 's not in India , knows something , can make a decision and can understand words like " I measured the Comcast line signal strengh for the last 24 hours and it dipped to just above zero 7 times in that period for a total of 95.4 minutes of non-functioning internet time so GET AN ENGINEER TO YOUR SWITCH AND DO N'T SENT OUT THE LOCAL DUMBASS AGAIN .
" Cheers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More accurate, anyway.
At any rate, I'll believe something has changed when I can talk to somebody who's not in India, knows something, can make a decision and can understand words like "I measured the Comcast line signal strengh for the last 24 hours and it dipped to just above zero 7 times in that period for a total of 95.4 minutes of non-functioning internet time so GET AN ENGINEER TO YOUR SWITCH AND DON'T SENT OUT THE LOCAL DUMBASS AGAIN.
"Cheers!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147152</id>
	<title>Re:Xfinity equals...</title>
	<author>fahrbot-bot</author>
	<datestamp>1266264660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Xfinity = how long it will take for your "network congestion profiled" P2P packets to arrive.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Xfinity = how long it will take for your " network congestion profiled " P2P packets to arrive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Xfinity = how long it will take for your "network congestion profiled" P2P packets to arrive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146940</id>
	<title>Magnabank</title>
	<author>aardwolf64</author>
	<datestamp>1266263640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reminds me of a branding for a local bank... Their commercials talk about how big banks don't give you personal service, and that they're not all that big.  Then they get the nerve to call their bank "Magnabank".</p><p><a href="http://www.magnabank.com/" title="magnabank.com">http://www.magnabank.com/</a> [magnabank.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of a branding for a local bank... Their commercials talk about how big banks do n't give you personal service , and that they 're not all that big .
Then they get the nerve to call their bank " Magnabank " .http : //www.magnabank.com/ [ magnabank.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of a branding for a local bank... Their commercials talk about how big banks don't give you personal service, and that they're not all that big.
Then they get the nerve to call their bank "Magnabank".http://www.magnabank.com/ [magnabank.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148382</id>
	<title>Re:You know</title>
	<author>Deanalator</author>
	<datestamp>1266227520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From what I could tell from the xfinity commercial I saw last night, it's more than just a brand change.  It looks like they are offering 100mb residential lines, which means deploying DOCSYS 3.0 network.  It also looks like they are offering a some sort of netflix style media services as well, which is a really good call on their end.</p><p>Also, I have a comcast business line (internet, no tv) in Portland, and love it.  I have a really solid connection, and if my internet goes out (which has happened once in the past 6 months since I got the service) I have a phone number for a guy that I can call and yell at.  This is also the only ISP I have ever dealt with that never gave me any crap for seeding terrabytes and terrabytes of movies, tv shows, and software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From what I could tell from the xfinity commercial I saw last night , it 's more than just a brand change .
It looks like they are offering 100mb residential lines , which means deploying DOCSYS 3.0 network .
It also looks like they are offering a some sort of netflix style media services as well , which is a really good call on their end.Also , I have a comcast business line ( internet , no tv ) in Portland , and love it .
I have a really solid connection , and if my internet goes out ( which has happened once in the past 6 months since I got the service ) I have a phone number for a guy that I can call and yell at .
This is also the only ISP I have ever dealt with that never gave me any crap for seeding terrabytes and terrabytes of movies , tv shows , and software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From what I could tell from the xfinity commercial I saw last night, it's more than just a brand change.
It looks like they are offering 100mb residential lines, which means deploying DOCSYS 3.0 network.
It also looks like they are offering a some sort of netflix style media services as well, which is a really good call on their end.Also, I have a comcast business line (internet, no tv) in Portland, and love it.
I have a really solid connection, and if my internet goes out (which has happened once in the past 6 months since I got the service) I have a phone number for a guy that I can call and yell at.
This is also the only ISP I have ever dealt with that never gave me any crap for seeding terrabytes and terrabytes of movies, tv shows, and software.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148630</id>
	<title>Re:its still comcrap to me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266228660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know people like to s/Comcast/Comcrap/, but it's really not as bad as people think.</p><p>I recently moved from Seattle (Comcast) to Austin (Time Warner), so I can tell you first hand that Time Warner is actually worse than Comcast.</p><p>Time Warner's <em>fastest</em> "turbo" download speed is only 15Mbit in Austin, while Comcast's <em>slowest</em> download speed is 20Mbit in Seattle.</p><p>Furthermore, Time Warner's HD DVR feels like it's a decade behind Comcast's. Examples:</p><ul><li>TW only gives you 7 days of program data instead of 14 on Comcast. Also, TW only displays 2 hours at a time, while Comcast displays 3 at a time.</li><li>TW won't let you search for upcoming shows to record; they force you to use the 7 day program listing, and they won't let you go into "vertical mode" for a single channel like Comcast. Likewise, TW's recording list feature doesn't allow you to change the sort order, but Comcast lets you sort on show name, time and length of recording.</li><li>TW won't let you prioritize your shows until a conflict occurs, and then you have to choose which one to cancel; canceling a recording on TW <em>deletes</em> the entire "record all new episodes" series.</li></ul><p>In conclusion, Comcast is definitely not the worst cable monopoly in the US, so stop implying that it is. I'd gladly switch from TW to Comcast if Comcast were available in Austin.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know people like to s/Comcast/Comcrap/ , but it 's really not as bad as people think.I recently moved from Seattle ( Comcast ) to Austin ( Time Warner ) , so I can tell you first hand that Time Warner is actually worse than Comcast.Time Warner 's fastest " turbo " download speed is only 15Mbit in Austin , while Comcast 's slowest download speed is 20Mbit in Seattle.Furthermore , Time Warner 's HD DVR feels like it 's a decade behind Comcast 's .
Examples : TW only gives you 7 days of program data instead of 14 on Comcast .
Also , TW only displays 2 hours at a time , while Comcast displays 3 at a time.TW wo n't let you search for upcoming shows to record ; they force you to use the 7 day program listing , and they wo n't let you go into " vertical mode " for a single channel like Comcast .
Likewise , TW 's recording list feature does n't allow you to change the sort order , but Comcast lets you sort on show name , time and length of recording.TW wo n't let you prioritize your shows until a conflict occurs , and then you have to choose which one to cancel ; canceling a recording on TW deletes the entire " record all new episodes " series.In conclusion , Comcast is definitely not the worst cable monopoly in the US , so stop implying that it is .
I 'd gladly switch from TW to Comcast if Comcast were available in Austin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know people like to s/Comcast/Comcrap/, but it's really not as bad as people think.I recently moved from Seattle (Comcast) to Austin (Time Warner), so I can tell you first hand that Time Warner is actually worse than Comcast.Time Warner's fastest "turbo" download speed is only 15Mbit in Austin, while Comcast's slowest download speed is 20Mbit in Seattle.Furthermore, Time Warner's HD DVR feels like it's a decade behind Comcast's.
Examples:TW only gives you 7 days of program data instead of 14 on Comcast.
Also, TW only displays 2 hours at a time, while Comcast displays 3 at a time.TW won't let you search for upcoming shows to record; they force you to use the 7 day program listing, and they won't let you go into "vertical mode" for a single channel like Comcast.
Likewise, TW's recording list feature doesn't allow you to change the sort order, but Comcast lets you sort on show name, time and length of recording.TW won't let you prioritize your shows until a conflict occurs, and then you have to choose which one to cancel; canceling a recording on TW deletes the entire "record all new episodes" series.In conclusion, Comcast is definitely not the worst cable monopoly in the US, so stop implying that it is.
I'd gladly switch from TW to Comcast if Comcast were available in Austin.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147014</id>
	<title>Are you in there McFly?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266263940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aspartame was just recently renamed, too, coincidence?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aspartame was just recently renamed , too , coincidence ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aspartame was just recently renamed, too, coincidence?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147850</id>
	<title>Re:bad branding</title>
	<author>RoFLKOPTr</author>
	<datestamp>1266224880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Your friends may talk shit about Comcast, but they have no idea how good Xfinity is, but damnit they have gotta be better than comcast.</p></div><p>Comcast isn't changing their name... they're just renaming their service. It's going to be Comcast Xfinity now.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your friends may talk shit about Comcast , but they have no idea how good Xfinity is , but damnit they have got ta be better than comcast.Comcast is n't changing their name... they 're just renaming their service .
It 's going to be Comcast Xfinity now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your friends may talk shit about Comcast, but they have no idea how good Xfinity is, but damnit they have gotta be better than comcast.Comcast isn't changing their name... they're just renaming their service.
It's going to be Comcast Xfinity now.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147188</id>
	<title>I have written my last check to this company</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266264780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whatever they call themselves, I will never write them another check.</p><p>Nothing but problems.</p><p>Like when I moved and they made 2 installation appointments, but never showed up.</p><p>Or, when they "upgraded" the network service and send a new cable modem, that didn't work and wouldn't fix.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whatever they call themselves , I will never write them another check.Nothing but problems.Like when I moved and they made 2 installation appointments , but never showed up.Or , when they " upgraded " the network service and send a new cable modem , that did n't work and would n't fix .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whatever they call themselves, I will never write them another check.Nothing but problems.Like when I moved and they made 2 installation appointments, but never showed up.Or, when they "upgraded" the network service and send a new cable modem, that didn't work and wouldn't fix.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147096</id>
	<title>Maybe they're tired of "Comcrap"</title>
	<author>russotto</author>
	<datestamp>1266264420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clearly, "Xfinity" is inteded to sound like "ex-finity", thus the opposite of "infinity".  The opposite of infinity is zero... whether that refers to quality of service, chance of getting a useful response from customer service, throughput, or bytes transferred without overage fees, I don't know.  I'm certain it's nothing to do with the bill, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly , " Xfinity " is inteded to sound like " ex-finity " , thus the opposite of " infinity " .
The opposite of infinity is zero... whether that refers to quality of service , chance of getting a useful response from customer service , throughput , or bytes transferred without overage fees , I do n't know .
I 'm certain it 's nothing to do with the bill , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly, "Xfinity" is inteded to sound like "ex-finity", thus the opposite of "infinity".
The opposite of infinity is zero... whether that refers to quality of service, chance of getting a useful response from customer service, throughput, or bytes transferred without overage fees, I don't know.
I'm certain it's nothing to do with the bill, though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31150754</id>
	<title>Re:Meaningless names</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266240300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I expect the invented names are easier to trademark and to find in search results (for those who can spell them more or less).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I expect the invented names are easier to trademark and to find in search results ( for those who can spell them more or less ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I expect the invented names are easier to trademark and to find in search results (for those who can spell them more or less).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148654</id>
	<title>Re:Xfinity equals...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266228780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Xfinity = tiny fix
<br>
Xfi nity
<br>
fix tiny
<br>
tiny fix</htmltext>
<tokenext>Xfinity = tiny fix Xfi nity fix tiny tiny fix</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Xfinity = tiny fix

Xfi nity

fix tiny

tiny fix</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147262</id>
	<title>What about all of our comcast.net email accounts.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266265080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will this drive even more people to go to an email address they control themselves?</p><p>I'm sure glad I switched to a hosted domain of my own.  I have been burned by too many ISP.</p><p>Seriously, how can our society ever hope to use email for real business if addresses aren't stable?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will this drive even more people to go to an email address they control themselves ? I 'm sure glad I switched to a hosted domain of my own .
I have been burned by too many ISP.Seriously , how can our society ever hope to use email for real business if addresses are n't stable ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will this drive even more people to go to an email address they control themselves?I'm sure glad I switched to a hosted domain of my own.
I have been burned by too many ISP.Seriously, how can our society ever hope to use email for real business if addresses aren't stable?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148268</id>
	<title>Re:bad branding</title>
	<author>Hes Nikke</author>
	<datestamp>1266226980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yes, but tenfinity and 10finity just look stupid</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yes , but tenfinity and 10finity just look stupid</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yes, but tenfinity and 10finity just look stupid</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148664</id>
	<title>Re:How about changing it to "XSucksALittleLess"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266228840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It sounds like you don't know what you're talking about either. 0 dBmV is an absolute signal strength measurement and has been the the target for a "perfect" signal for about 50 years. If you are referring to a digital signal, then the required signal strength can go as low as -12 dBmV and still be considered "perfect". Assuming the signal is fine at the tap (it's almost always a problem with a line AFTER the demarc), your problem is either ingress somewhere on the line or shitty hardware and both are just as likely as the other to occur with Comcast. I'm speaking as a former cable company employee.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It sounds like you do n't know what you 're talking about either .
0 dBmV is an absolute signal strength measurement and has been the the target for a " perfect " signal for about 50 years .
If you are referring to a digital signal , then the required signal strength can go as low as -12 dBmV and still be considered " perfect " .
Assuming the signal is fine at the tap ( it 's almost always a problem with a line AFTER the demarc ) , your problem is either ingress somewhere on the line or shitty hardware and both are just as likely as the other to occur with Comcast .
I 'm speaking as a former cable company employee .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It sounds like you don't know what you're talking about either.
0 dBmV is an absolute signal strength measurement and has been the the target for a "perfect" signal for about 50 years.
If you are referring to a digital signal, then the required signal strength can go as low as -12 dBmV and still be considered "perfect".
Assuming the signal is fine at the tap (it's almost always a problem with a line AFTER the demarc), your problem is either ingress somewhere on the line or shitty hardware and both are just as likely as the other to occur with Comcast.
I'm speaking as a former cable company employee.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147272</id>
	<title>Re:its still comcrap to me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266265140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Crapfinity<br>Xfinshitty<br>Xcrappity<br>Suxfinity<br>Nope, they must not have done that -- Hell I'm half a century old, bet kids could come up with many more.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>CrapfinityXfinshittyXcrappitySuxfinityNope , they must not have done that -- Hell I 'm half a century old , bet kids could come up with many more .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CrapfinityXfinshittyXcrappitySuxfinityNope, they must not have done that -- Hell I'm half a century old, bet kids could come up with many more.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147698</id>
	<title>Re:Meaningless names</title>
	<author>McNally</author>
	<datestamp>1266267300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>who for some unfathomable reason decided to call themselves "Acretive Solutions," or something. I mean, aside from the impossibility of being able to tell if it's "Acretive" or "Acrative" just by listening to it, what the hell is that supposed to mean?</p></div></blockquote><p>Not to imply that it's a good name, but it sounds as though you're not aware that "accretive" is <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/accretive" title="reference.com">a genuine word with an established meaning</a> [reference.com] (it's an adjectival form of "accretion".)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>who for some unfathomable reason decided to call themselves " Acretive Solutions , " or something .
I mean , aside from the impossibility of being able to tell if it 's " Acretive " or " Acrative " just by listening to it , what the hell is that supposed to mean ? Not to imply that it 's a good name , but it sounds as though you 're not aware that " accretive " is a genuine word with an established meaning [ reference.com ] ( it 's an adjectival form of " accretion " .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>who for some unfathomable reason decided to call themselves "Acretive Solutions," or something.
I mean, aside from the impossibility of being able to tell if it's "Acretive" or "Acrative" just by listening to it, what the hell is that supposed to mean?Not to imply that it's a good name, but it sounds as though you're not aware that "accretive" is a genuine word with an established meaning [reference.com] (it's an adjectival form of "accretion".
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147432</id>
	<title>Re:How stupid do they think we are? oh, wait ...</title>
	<author>drdanny\_orig</author>
	<datestamp>1266265920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nobody ever went broke underestimating the stupidity of the American public.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody ever went broke underestimating the stupidity of the American public .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobody ever went broke underestimating the stupidity of the American public.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147204</id>
	<title>Re:Meaningless names</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266264840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Accenture, Cingular, Elementis, Altria, I mean, what the fuck is that? At least the idiots at "Consignia" had the sense to revert back to the name that everyone understood and recognized for decades, i.e. 'Royal Mail.'</p></div></blockquote><p>Accenture lost the Arthur Andersen name when they split from the accounting firm.  Just in time for the Andersen name to be blackened by the Enron scandal.  So, definitely a good name change for them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Accenture , Cingular , Elementis , Altria , I mean , what the fuck is that ?
At least the idiots at " Consignia " had the sense to revert back to the name that everyone understood and recognized for decades , i.e .
'Royal Mail .
'Accenture lost the Arthur Andersen name when they split from the accounting firm .
Just in time for the Andersen name to be blackened by the Enron scandal .
So , definitely a good name change for them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Accenture, Cingular, Elementis, Altria, I mean, what the fuck is that?
At least the idiots at "Consignia" had the sense to revert back to the name that everyone understood and recognized for decades, i.e.
'Royal Mail.
'Accenture lost the Arthur Andersen name when they split from the accounting firm.
Just in time for the Andersen name to be blackened by the Enron scandal.
So, definitely a good name change for them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148768</id>
	<title>Re:Xfinity equals...</title>
	<author>hedwards</author>
	<datestamp>1266229320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's probably because they'll have the cable modem service out for several hours every day and one not know and two not care enough to fix it. And the fact that there cable television service for the longest time was less viewable on certain channels than using a TV without an antenna downstairs for local broadcasts.<br> <br>

If they actually cared enough to address your concern you should count yourself lucky, because around here they would have to actively work at caring less about the customer because standard apathy isn't going to reach that level of incompetence. It's not really a shock that satellite dishes are popping up around here with such frequency. DirecTV in particular actually called my parents up because their monitoring software indicated that the services was probably not living up to their standards. (For the record it actually still beat the pants off of Comcrap, but caring about quality earns points with me especially when their standards are higher than mine)</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's probably because they 'll have the cable modem service out for several hours every day and one not know and two not care enough to fix it .
And the fact that there cable television service for the longest time was less viewable on certain channels than using a TV without an antenna downstairs for local broadcasts .
If they actually cared enough to address your concern you should count yourself lucky , because around here they would have to actively work at caring less about the customer because standard apathy is n't going to reach that level of incompetence .
It 's not really a shock that satellite dishes are popping up around here with such frequency .
DirecTV in particular actually called my parents up because their monitoring software indicated that the services was probably not living up to their standards .
( For the record it actually still beat the pants off of Comcrap , but caring about quality earns points with me especially when their standards are higher than mine )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's probably because they'll have the cable modem service out for several hours every day and one not know and two not care enough to fix it.
And the fact that there cable television service for the longest time was less viewable on certain channels than using a TV without an antenna downstairs for local broadcasts.
If they actually cared enough to address your concern you should count yourself lucky, because around here they would have to actively work at caring less about the customer because standard apathy isn't going to reach that level of incompetence.
It's not really a shock that satellite dishes are popping up around here with such frequency.
DirecTV in particular actually called my parents up because their monitoring software indicated that the services was probably not living up to their standards.
(For the record it actually still beat the pants off of Comcrap, but caring about quality earns points with me especially when their standards are higher than mine)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31151028</id>
	<title>Re:And Yet....</title>
	<author>Derek Pomery</author>
	<datestamp>1266242940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When Verizon Fios arrived in our area, I signed up happily.  Canceled after one weekend.</p><p>Why? Well. They lied to me.  I asked repeatedly. "Do you block ports?"</p><p>Over and over, multiple representatives, they told me.  "No, we do not."</p><p>Well. They do.  Their justification that I eventually got after going to tier 2 tech support for blocking ports I use on my little home server (25, 53, 80, 443) is that it is to encourage upgrade to the incredibly expensive business plan.  Is why those folks on Verizon Fios tend to use 8080, and get blocked at particularly hardcore firewalls (you know, those ones that only allow through 80 and 443).</p><p>I'm just fine w/ my Comcast service.  They leave me alone, they don't block ports, their terms of service say I can a server for personal reasons and they don't care.</p><p>It costs me $50 a month for high speed with the digital cable channels I care about included (Comedy Central, Cartoon Network, Discovery, etc).  And changing channels isn't ridiculously sluggish like it was w/ the Fios netbox.</p><p>Oh, and if anyone suggests it was perhaps due to the Verizon router that I had the port blocking, I actually had them activate the ether drop, and plugged a laptop directly into the external box.  The ports were still blocked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When Verizon Fios arrived in our area , I signed up happily .
Canceled after one weekend.Why ?
Well. They lied to me .
I asked repeatedly .
" Do you block ports ?
" Over and over , multiple representatives , they told me .
" No , we do not. " Well .
They do .
Their justification that I eventually got after going to tier 2 tech support for blocking ports I use on my little home server ( 25 , 53 , 80 , 443 ) is that it is to encourage upgrade to the incredibly expensive business plan .
Is why those folks on Verizon Fios tend to use 8080 , and get blocked at particularly hardcore firewalls ( you know , those ones that only allow through 80 and 443 ) .I 'm just fine w/ my Comcast service .
They leave me alone , they do n't block ports , their terms of service say I can a server for personal reasons and they do n't care.It costs me $ 50 a month for high speed with the digital cable channels I care about included ( Comedy Central , Cartoon Network , Discovery , etc ) .
And changing channels is n't ridiculously sluggish like it was w/ the Fios netbox.Oh , and if anyone suggests it was perhaps due to the Verizon router that I had the port blocking , I actually had them activate the ether drop , and plugged a laptop directly into the external box .
The ports were still blocked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When Verizon Fios arrived in our area, I signed up happily.
Canceled after one weekend.Why?
Well. They lied to me.
I asked repeatedly.
"Do you block ports?
"Over and over, multiple representatives, they told me.
"No, we do not."Well.
They do.
Their justification that I eventually got after going to tier 2 tech support for blocking ports I use on my little home server (25, 53, 80, 443) is that it is to encourage upgrade to the incredibly expensive business plan.
Is why those folks on Verizon Fios tend to use 8080, and get blocked at particularly hardcore firewalls (you know, those ones that only allow through 80 and 443).I'm just fine w/ my Comcast service.
They leave me alone, they don't block ports, their terms of service say I can a server for personal reasons and they don't care.It costs me $50 a month for high speed with the digital cable channels I care about included (Comedy Central, Cartoon Network, Discovery, etc).
And changing channels isn't ridiculously sluggish like it was w/ the Fios netbox.Oh, and if anyone suggests it was perhaps due to the Verizon router that I had the port blocking, I actually had them activate the ether drop, and plugged a laptop directly into the external box.
The ports were still blocked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147626</id>
	<title>It's nothing more than a marketing move.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266266880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Changing the name just means that some people might be more inclined to obtain service from Comcast/Xfinity because even though they probably have heard of Comcast's terrible service, they might not know that the "new" company named "Xfinity" is really just Comcast with a new name.  In other words, it's a move that was done purely for marketing reasons.  More customers = more money, regardless of the quality of service.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Changing the name just means that some people might be more inclined to obtain service from Comcast/Xfinity because even though they probably have heard of Comcast 's terrible service , they might not know that the " new " company named " Xfinity " is really just Comcast with a new name .
In other words , it 's a move that was done purely for marketing reasons .
More customers = more money , regardless of the quality of service .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Changing the name just means that some people might be more inclined to obtain service from Comcast/Xfinity because even though they probably have heard of Comcast's terrible service, they might not know that the "new" company named "Xfinity" is really just Comcast with a new name.
In other words, it's a move that was done purely for marketing reasons.
More customers = more money, regardless of the quality of service.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148742</id>
	<title>Xfinity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266229260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Rebranding to "Xfinity" is not likely to cause me to forget how absurdly cable subscription rates have risen recently nor is it likely to cause me to hate comcast any less for charging extra because a fricking tivo is plugged into my cable service.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rebranding to " Xfinity " is not likely to cause me to forget how absurdly cable subscription rates have risen recently nor is it likely to cause me to hate comcast any less for charging extra because a fricking tivo is plugged into my cable service .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rebranding to "Xfinity" is not likely to cause me to forget how absurdly cable subscription rates have risen recently nor is it likely to cause me to hate comcast any less for charging extra because a fricking tivo is plugged into my cable service.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147612</id>
	<title>Re:You know</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266266760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Conversely, fix the service and it won't be a problem.</p><p>Yeah, sure! Worked for GTE.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Conversely , fix the service and it wo n't be a problem.Yeah , sure !
Worked for GTE .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Conversely, fix the service and it won't be a problem.Yeah, sure!
Worked for GTE.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147912</id>
	<title>Re:Oh lemme try one!</title>
	<author>seven of five</author>
	<datestamp>1266225240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How 'bout Xfinityplex = number of times you'll have to sit thru craptacular Xfinity ads on the tube.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How 'bout Xfinityplex = number of times you 'll have to sit thru craptacular Xfinity ads on the tube .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How 'bout Xfinityplex = number of times you'll have to sit thru craptacular Xfinity ads on the tube.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31154990</id>
	<title>Re:bad branding</title>
	<author>MachineShedFred</author>
	<datestamp>1266335100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They'll still be Comcastards though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll still be Comcastards though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll still be Comcastards though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147134</id>
	<title>How stupid do they think we are?  oh, wait ...</title>
	<author>srealm</author>
	<datestamp>1266264600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A rotten company will be a rotten company, no matter how many times it changes it's name.</p><p>You get customers back, and customers to like you by actually DOING something for your customers, even if it hurts your bottom line.  Companies like Verizon know this better than anyone - Verizon was more or less a 'last resort' until they brought out FiOS, improved their customer service, and basically focused more on what their customers were demanding.  That's not to say they're perfect, but a LOT better than before, and have the rep to back it up.  And they didn't even need to spend millions of dollars changing their name to do it.</p><p>Telstra (in Australia) by contrast, spent all the money changing from Telecom to Telstra, but didn't improve a damn thing with customer service or the services they were offering.  So the stink followed them through the new name.</p><p>When will companies learn, it's the customers, stupid!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A rotten company will be a rotten company , no matter how many times it changes it 's name.You get customers back , and customers to like you by actually DOING something for your customers , even if it hurts your bottom line .
Companies like Verizon know this better than anyone - Verizon was more or less a 'last resort ' until they brought out FiOS , improved their customer service , and basically focused more on what their customers were demanding .
That 's not to say they 're perfect , but a LOT better than before , and have the rep to back it up .
And they did n't even need to spend millions of dollars changing their name to do it.Telstra ( in Australia ) by contrast , spent all the money changing from Telecom to Telstra , but did n't improve a damn thing with customer service or the services they were offering .
So the stink followed them through the new name.When will companies learn , it 's the customers , stupid !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A rotten company will be a rotten company, no matter how many times it changes it's name.You get customers back, and customers to like you by actually DOING something for your customers, even if it hurts your bottom line.
Companies like Verizon know this better than anyone - Verizon was more or less a 'last resort' until they brought out FiOS, improved their customer service, and basically focused more on what their customers were demanding.
That's not to say they're perfect, but a LOT better than before, and have the rep to back it up.
And they didn't even need to spend millions of dollars changing their name to do it.Telstra (in Australia) by contrast, spent all the money changing from Telecom to Telstra, but didn't improve a damn thing with customer service or the services they were offering.
So the stink followed them through the new name.When will companies learn, it's the customers, stupid!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146922</id>
	<title>Re:its still comcrap to me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266263580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, I do use Comcast to access the majority of my adult films.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I do use Comcast to access the majority of my adult films .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I do use Comcast to access the majority of my adult films.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31151104</id>
	<title>Re:Meaningless names</title>
	<author>dissy</author>
	<datestamp>1266243720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>WTF is it with this trend of conjuring up completely meaningless words to use as company names?</i></p><p>Because every word in the dictionary has already been trademarked for some field, and no company wants to pre-limit themselves to their current field (or as others call it, not having focus)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF is it with this trend of conjuring up completely meaningless words to use as company names ? Because every word in the dictionary has already been trademarked for some field , and no company wants to pre-limit themselves to their current field ( or as others call it , not having focus )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF is it with this trend of conjuring up completely meaningless words to use as company names?Because every word in the dictionary has already been trademarked for some field, and no company wants to pre-limit themselves to their current field (or as others call it, not having focus)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147224</id>
	<title>Logo Design?</title>
	<author>whisper\_jeff</author>
	<datestamp>1266264900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who's going to design their logo? Rob Leifeld or Jim Lee? I really hope Jim - Rob's a hack.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who 's going to design their logo ?
Rob Leifeld or Jim Lee ?
I really hope Jim - Rob 's a hack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who's going to design their logo?
Rob Leifeld or Jim Lee?
I really hope Jim - Rob's a hack.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31149936</id>
	<title>Lipstick on a pig ...</title>
	<author>bensode</author>
	<datestamp>1266234900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=lipstick+on+a+pig&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;ei=ZNB5S8CMK5G4NfmwoLUH&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=image\_result\_group&amp;ct=title&amp;resnum=4&amp;ved=0CCQQsAQwAw" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=lipstick+on+a+pig&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;ei=ZNB5S8CMK5G4NfmwoLUH&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=image\_result\_group&amp;ct=title&amp;resnum=4&amp;ved=0CCQQsAQwAw</a> [google.com]</p><p>Yes, I went there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //images.google.com/images ? hl = en&amp;source = hp&amp;q = lipstick + on + a + pig&amp;um = 1&amp;ie = UTF-8&amp;ei = ZNB5S8CMK5G4NfmwoLUH&amp;sa = X&amp;oi = image \ _result \ _group&amp;ct = title&amp;resnum = 4&amp;ved = 0CCQQsAQwAw [ google.com ] Yes , I went there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=lipstick+on+a+pig&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;ei=ZNB5S8CMK5G4NfmwoLUH&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=image\_result\_group&amp;ct=title&amp;resnum=4&amp;ved=0CCQQsAQwAw [google.com]Yes, I went there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31154616</id>
	<title>Re:Meaningless names</title>
	<author>NJRoadfan</author>
	<datestamp>1266332640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The first common example of this was likely Exxon. They wanted a distinctive name that could be thoroughly trademarked and previously didn't mean anything (no lawsuits claiming prior use).</htmltext>
<tokenext>The first common example of this was likely Exxon .
They wanted a distinctive name that could be thoroughly trademarked and previously did n't mean anything ( no lawsuits claiming prior use ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first common example of this was likely Exxon.
They wanted a distinctive name that could be thoroughly trademarked and previously didn't mean anything (no lawsuits claiming prior use).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147478</id>
	<title>Re:Xfinity equals...</title>
	<author>RobDude</author>
	<datestamp>1266266100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not sure why Comcast gets so much hate.  Maybe it depends on the local market you are in?</p><p>I've called Comcast a handful of times and I've always had very short waits and someone who speaks and understands English.</p><p>The most recent call was because of poor signal quality.  I spent about 10 minutes on the phone and they sent out a tech the next day.  The tech showed up, ran a new line and then took the time to properly attached the cable line to my house; it was a major improvement.</p><p>After that, internet worked great again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure why Comcast gets so much hate .
Maybe it depends on the local market you are in ? I 've called Comcast a handful of times and I 've always had very short waits and someone who speaks and understands English.The most recent call was because of poor signal quality .
I spent about 10 minutes on the phone and they sent out a tech the next day .
The tech showed up , ran a new line and then took the time to properly attached the cable line to my house ; it was a major improvement.After that , internet worked great again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure why Comcast gets so much hate.
Maybe it depends on the local market you are in?I've called Comcast a handful of times and I've always had very short waits and someone who speaks and understands English.The most recent call was because of poor signal quality.
I spent about 10 minutes on the phone and they sent out a tech the next day.
The tech showed up, ran a new line and then took the time to properly attached the cable line to my house; it was a major improvement.After that, internet worked great again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147230</id>
	<title>Re:Xfinity equals...</title>
	<author>sgilti</author>
	<datestamp>1266264960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is quite literally why I will never be a Comcast customer again. Even though they went door-to-door as the first fiber carrier in my neighborhood, and AT&amp;T isn't here yet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is quite literally why I will never be a Comcast customer again .
Even though they went door-to-door as the first fiber carrier in my neighborhood , and AT&amp;T is n't here yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is quite literally why I will never be a Comcast customer again.
Even though they went door-to-door as the first fiber carrier in my neighborhood, and AT&amp;T isn't here yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147868</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>oopsdude</author>
	<datestamp>1266225000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Everyone knows this isn't true. Why do you think Comcast still <i>has</i> customers?</p></div><p>Because I live in a 100-year-old building on the north side of Chicago where my options are either Comcast or leaching off the guy who thinks "ismokerocks" is a funny SSID. The cable runs bare along the outside of my building until it punches through a hole that was drilled straight into the original brick. I'm scared to jerry-rig anything else. And yet...


I have had every conceivable problem with their service. They repeatedly charge me for equipment that's been installed for months, they double-charge me for the same equipment, they send me bills on random days of the month, their technician was on Facebook on <i>my</i> connection on <i>my</i> time, they charged me for residential and "business-class" Internet <b>simultaneously</b> after being repeatedly assured that it would not happen (I foresaw this and made sure to ask)...


Know what I can't do? Take my business to a competitor. Is there a reason Comcast isn't being forced to lease out its infrastructure, like AT&amp;T was?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone knows this is n't true .
Why do you think Comcast still has customers ? Because I live in a 100-year-old building on the north side of Chicago where my options are either Comcast or leaching off the guy who thinks " ismokerocks " is a funny SSID .
The cable runs bare along the outside of my building until it punches through a hole that was drilled straight into the original brick .
I 'm scared to jerry-rig anything else .
And yet.. . I have had every conceivable problem with their service .
They repeatedly charge me for equipment that 's been installed for months , they double-charge me for the same equipment , they send me bills on random days of the month , their technician was on Facebook on my connection on my time , they charged me for residential and " business-class " Internet simultaneously after being repeatedly assured that it would not happen ( I foresaw this and made sure to ask ) .. . Know what I ca n't do ?
Take my business to a competitor .
Is there a reason Comcast is n't being forced to lease out its infrastructure , like AT&amp;T was ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone knows this isn't true.
Why do you think Comcast still has customers?Because I live in a 100-year-old building on the north side of Chicago where my options are either Comcast or leaching off the guy who thinks "ismokerocks" is a funny SSID.
The cable runs bare along the outside of my building until it punches through a hole that was drilled straight into the original brick.
I'm scared to jerry-rig anything else.
And yet...


I have had every conceivable problem with their service.
They repeatedly charge me for equipment that's been installed for months, they double-charge me for the same equipment, they send me bills on random days of the month, their technician was on Facebook on my connection on my time, they charged me for residential and "business-class" Internet simultaneously after being repeatedly assured that it would not happen (I foresaw this and made sure to ask)...


Know what I can't do?
Take my business to a competitor.
Is there a reason Comcast isn't being forced to lease out its infrastructure, like AT&amp;T was?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147776</id>
	<title>Re:its still comcrap to me</title>
	<author>syntheticmemory</author>
	<datestamp>1266224520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Xfinity sounds like it should be the name of a sports car company... or perhaps an adult film company.</p></div><p>Or a "white van" speaker system.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Xfinity sounds like it should be the name of a sports car company... or perhaps an adult film company.Or a " white van " speaker system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Xfinity sounds like it should be the name of a sports car company... or perhaps an adult film company.Or a "white van" speaker system.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147268</id>
	<title>Re:How about changing it to "XSucksALittleLess"</title>
	<author>nhytefall</author>
	<datestamp>1266265140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Won't ever happen as long as I continue to have conversations like with their "tech" support: <br> <br>

Comcast rep: I don't see any problems in your area<br>
Me: Please check again. I am seeing high lag, dropped packets, and randow route changes in the Comcast network. <br>
Comcast rep: Everything's okay within 750' of your location. <br>
Me: The problem isn't there, its further out Actually, it's at [ip address] which is [hostname], and is probably near [address] <br>
Comcast rep: Wow, how did you see that? <br>
Me: Traceroute <br>
Comcast rep: I need to learn to do that</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wo n't ever happen as long as I continue to have conversations like with their " tech " support : Comcast rep : I do n't see any problems in your area Me : Please check again .
I am seeing high lag , dropped packets , and randow route changes in the Comcast network .
Comcast rep : Everything 's okay within 750 ' of your location .
Me : The problem is n't there , its further out Actually , it 's at [ ip address ] which is [ hostname ] , and is probably near [ address ] Comcast rep : Wow , how did you see that ?
Me : Traceroute Comcast rep : I need to learn to do that</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Won't ever happen as long as I continue to have conversations like with their "tech" support:  

Comcast rep: I don't see any problems in your area
Me: Please check again.
I am seeing high lag, dropped packets, and randow route changes in the Comcast network.
Comcast rep: Everything's okay within 750' of your location.
Me: The problem isn't there, its further out Actually, it's at [ip address] which is [hostname], and is probably near [address] 
Comcast rep: Wow, how did you see that?
Me: Traceroute 
Comcast rep: I need to learn to do that</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147108</id>
	<title>Comcastic!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266264480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>XFinity? What happened to Comcastic?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>XFinity ?
What happened to Comcastic ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>XFinity?
What happened to Comcastic?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147588</id>
	<title>What's in a name?</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1266266640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would a turd by any other name still taste like shit?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would a turd by any other name still taste like shit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would a turd by any other name still taste like shit?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146818</id>
	<title>bad branding</title>
	<author>tverbeek</author>
	<datestamp>1266263160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really don't see how a harder-to-pronounce name will make the company any more appealing to customers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really do n't see how a harder-to-pronounce name will make the company any more appealing to customers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really don't see how a harder-to-pronounce name will make the company any more appealing to customers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148472</id>
	<title>No, that make you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266227940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... their XBitch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... their XBitch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... their XBitch.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147652</id>
	<title>Re:its still comcrap to me</title>
	<author>DarkOx</author>
	<datestamp>1266267000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Comcast - leads on even unfamiliar with the brand to assume they have something to do with communications.</p><p>Xfinity - ??? Who could even guess</p><p>Names apparently have to be useless now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Comcast - leads on even unfamiliar with the brand to assume they have something to do with communications.Xfinity - ? ? ?
Who could even guessNames apparently have to be useless now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Comcast - leads on even unfamiliar with the brand to assume they have something to do with communications.Xfinity - ???
Who could even guessNames apparently have to be useless now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31150344</id>
	<title>Crapcast</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266237420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe it's just because "Crapcast" has a much nicer ring to it than "Crapfinity"...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it 's just because " Crapcast " has a much nicer ring to it than " Crapfinity " .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it's just because "Crapcast" has a much nicer ring to it than "Crapfinity"...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147516</id>
	<title>No matter the name, this is the same company...</title>
	<author>olePigeon (Wik)</author>
	<datestamp>1266266220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>
No matter the name, this is the same company that told me for over 3 years that all the problems I was having were my fault, not theirs.  Despite having a 3 second ping (yes, 3000 ms), apparently Comcast considers that acceptable and not worth fixing.  If I wanted a technician to come out and check the lines, I would have to pay for it.  Comcast was my only option, my address didn't qualify for DSL, which is ironic considering I live in "Silicon Valley."

AT&amp;T finally started rolling out U-Verse in my area, which I jumped on immediately.  By immediately, I mean 2 full months of trying to convince AT&amp;T to send a technician out to hook me up because their survey monkey simply didn't put my address down in their Excel spread sheet database; every address <i>around me</i> was eligible for U-Verse, including three apartments I shared walls and ceilings with.  AT&amp;T "fixed" the problem, apparently, by inverting their spread sheet.  Now <i>I'm</i> the <i>only</i> address at the complex eligible for U-Verse.  *sigh* At least I have U-Verse and I can actually play games online.

A couple weeks after I finally got U-Verse installed and canceled my Comcast, Comcast sent over two technicians.  Despite having a large, red, "No Soliciting" sign on my door, they interrupted my friends and me on a nice Saturday evening of D&amp;D (it was after 7PM).  They explained to me that were aware of all the problems I was having, and attributed it to old, out-of-spec wiring at the apartment complex, and a misconfigured node in my area that was causing latency problems.  I was actually pretty speechless.

I finally asked them that after 3 years of telling me "it's on your end," you fucktards bother me on a Saturday evening to finally own up to your own incompetence?  Pointed at the no soliciting sign, told them to fuck off, then slammed the door.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No matter the name , this is the same company that told me for over 3 years that all the problems I was having were my fault , not theirs .
Despite having a 3 second ping ( yes , 3000 ms ) , apparently Comcast considers that acceptable and not worth fixing .
If I wanted a technician to come out and check the lines , I would have to pay for it .
Comcast was my only option , my address did n't qualify for DSL , which is ironic considering I live in " Silicon Valley .
" AT&amp;T finally started rolling out U-Verse in my area , which I jumped on immediately .
By immediately , I mean 2 full months of trying to convince AT&amp;T to send a technician out to hook me up because their survey monkey simply did n't put my address down in their Excel spread sheet database ; every address around me was eligible for U-Verse , including three apartments I shared walls and ceilings with .
AT&amp;T " fixed " the problem , apparently , by inverting their spread sheet .
Now I 'm the only address at the complex eligible for U-Verse .
* sigh * At least I have U-Verse and I can actually play games online .
A couple weeks after I finally got U-Verse installed and canceled my Comcast , Comcast sent over two technicians .
Despite having a large , red , " No Soliciting " sign on my door , they interrupted my friends and me on a nice Saturday evening of D&amp;D ( it was after 7PM ) .
They explained to me that were aware of all the problems I was having , and attributed it to old , out-of-spec wiring at the apartment complex , and a misconfigured node in my area that was causing latency problems .
I was actually pretty speechless .
I finally asked them that after 3 years of telling me " it 's on your end , " you fucktards bother me on a Saturday evening to finally own up to your own incompetence ?
Pointed at the no soliciting sign , told them to fuck off , then slammed the door .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
No matter the name, this is the same company that told me for over 3 years that all the problems I was having were my fault, not theirs.
Despite having a 3 second ping (yes, 3000 ms), apparently Comcast considers that acceptable and not worth fixing.
If I wanted a technician to come out and check the lines, I would have to pay for it.
Comcast was my only option, my address didn't qualify for DSL, which is ironic considering I live in "Silicon Valley.
"

AT&amp;T finally started rolling out U-Verse in my area, which I jumped on immediately.
By immediately, I mean 2 full months of trying to convince AT&amp;T to send a technician out to hook me up because their survey monkey simply didn't put my address down in their Excel spread sheet database; every address around me was eligible for U-Verse, including three apartments I shared walls and ceilings with.
AT&amp;T "fixed" the problem, apparently, by inverting their spread sheet.
Now I'm the only address at the complex eligible for U-Verse.
*sigh* At least I have U-Verse and I can actually play games online.
A couple weeks after I finally got U-Verse installed and canceled my Comcast, Comcast sent over two technicians.
Despite having a large, red, "No Soliciting" sign on my door, they interrupted my friends and me on a nice Saturday evening of D&amp;D (it was after 7PM).
They explained to me that were aware of all the problems I was having, and attributed it to old, out-of-spec wiring at the apartment complex, and a misconfigured node in my area that was causing latency problems.
I was actually pretty speechless.
I finally asked them that after 3 years of telling me "it's on your end," you fucktards bother me on a Saturday evening to finally own up to your own incompetence?
Pointed at the no soliciting sign, told them to fuck off, then slammed the door.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147618</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, and Blackwater is now called Xe.</title>
	<author>svtdragon</author>
	<datestamp>1266266760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I, for one, welcome our new Xebranded overlords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I , for one , welcome our new Xebranded overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, for one, welcome our new Xebranded overlords.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148244</id>
	<title>They are clueless they offer free NHL CI 2/16 2/22</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266226860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are clueless they offer free NHL CI 2/16 2/22 to bad that is the Olympics hockey brake.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are clueless they offer free NHL CI 2/16 2/22 to bad that is the Olympics hockey brake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are clueless they offer free NHL CI 2/16 2/22 to bad that is the Olympics hockey brake.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147672</id>
	<title>Re:its still comcrap to me</title>
	<author>Lumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1266267120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Comcast makes most of it's profit from the Porn channels.</p><p>I am not making that up.   It's the top grossing income stream.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Comcast makes most of it 's profit from the Porn channels.I am not making that up .
It 's the top grossing income stream .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Comcast makes most of it's profit from the Porn channels.I am not making that up.
It's the top grossing income stream.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148086</id>
	<title>Re:How about changing it to "XSucksALittleLess"</title>
	<author>PNutts</author>
	<datestamp>1266226080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>More accurate, anyway. At any rate, I'll believe something has changed when I can talk to somebody who's not in India, knows something, can make a decision and can understand words like "I measured the Comcast line signal strengh for the last 24 hours and it dipped to just above zero 7 times in that period for a total of 95.4 minutes of non-functioning internet time so GET AN ENGINEER TO YOUR SWITCH AND DON'T SENT OUT THE LOCAL DUMBASS AGAIN."</p></div><p>While many of the comments (in the overall thread) are funny, I don't think they reflect reality. Sure, I would like to have more of a choice but that is a different issue.</p><p>I've been with Comcast for many years and I've never spoken to off-shore support. I suppose a quick Google would find if they do or not. Last week I was having trouble using VPN from home. I called Comcast and the call started as voice response which normally ticks me off, but after I told it "Internet" and "I cannot connect" my cable modem reset. Wow. After a few more seconds I was transferred to a live technician who gave me some technical information about my connection. He wasn't local but sometimes they are. In most every case I've discovered they are usually bored techies and enjoy talking to technical customers about the various pieces and will devulge detailed information.</p><p>The last physical visit to my home was for TV/Internet connection issues and they replaced every piece of equipment between my TV and the box on the telephone pole (I have a long run to the pole). The guys were local, intelligent, and new a heck of a lot about what they were doing including measuring signal strength as compared to cable modem proximity to my wireless router (Belkin - I'll get back with my first wife before I buy another one of your wireless routers, and Motorola - It's called shielding).</p><p>My town has various "depots" around town where you can go in and pick up/drop off equipment and talk to people face to face. The line moves fast and the folks there are a hoot. Sure, they want to sell you stuff and I keep saying "no". I have basic cable (only analog channels below 32) and Internet service.</p><p>So maybe your issues are regional or closer to home. Or maybe they are based on a previous experience. I do know that for a company that can tell me to bugger off they treat me well.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>More accurate , anyway .
At any rate , I 'll believe something has changed when I can talk to somebody who 's not in India , knows something , can make a decision and can understand words like " I measured the Comcast line signal strengh for the last 24 hours and it dipped to just above zero 7 times in that period for a total of 95.4 minutes of non-functioning internet time so GET AN ENGINEER TO YOUR SWITCH AND DO N'T SENT OUT THE LOCAL DUMBASS AGAIN .
" While many of the comments ( in the overall thread ) are funny , I do n't think they reflect reality .
Sure , I would like to have more of a choice but that is a different issue.I 've been with Comcast for many years and I 've never spoken to off-shore support .
I suppose a quick Google would find if they do or not .
Last week I was having trouble using VPN from home .
I called Comcast and the call started as voice response which normally ticks me off , but after I told it " Internet " and " I can not connect " my cable modem reset .
Wow. After a few more seconds I was transferred to a live technician who gave me some technical information about my connection .
He was n't local but sometimes they are .
In most every case I 've discovered they are usually bored techies and enjoy talking to technical customers about the various pieces and will devulge detailed information.The last physical visit to my home was for TV/Internet connection issues and they replaced every piece of equipment between my TV and the box on the telephone pole ( I have a long run to the pole ) .
The guys were local , intelligent , and new a heck of a lot about what they were doing including measuring signal strength as compared to cable modem proximity to my wireless router ( Belkin - I 'll get back with my first wife before I buy another one of your wireless routers , and Motorola - It 's called shielding ) .My town has various " depots " around town where you can go in and pick up/drop off equipment and talk to people face to face .
The line moves fast and the folks there are a hoot .
Sure , they want to sell you stuff and I keep saying " no " .
I have basic cable ( only analog channels below 32 ) and Internet service.So maybe your issues are regional or closer to home .
Or maybe they are based on a previous experience .
I do know that for a company that can tell me to bugger off they treat me well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More accurate, anyway.
At any rate, I'll believe something has changed when I can talk to somebody who's not in India, knows something, can make a decision and can understand words like "I measured the Comcast line signal strengh for the last 24 hours and it dipped to just above zero 7 times in that period for a total of 95.4 minutes of non-functioning internet time so GET AN ENGINEER TO YOUR SWITCH AND DON'T SENT OUT THE LOCAL DUMBASS AGAIN.
"While many of the comments (in the overall thread) are funny, I don't think they reflect reality.
Sure, I would like to have more of a choice but that is a different issue.I've been with Comcast for many years and I've never spoken to off-shore support.
I suppose a quick Google would find if they do or not.
Last week I was having trouble using VPN from home.
I called Comcast and the call started as voice response which normally ticks me off, but after I told it "Internet" and "I cannot connect" my cable modem reset.
Wow. After a few more seconds I was transferred to a live technician who gave me some technical information about my connection.
He wasn't local but sometimes they are.
In most every case I've discovered they are usually bored techies and enjoy talking to technical customers about the various pieces and will devulge detailed information.The last physical visit to my home was for TV/Internet connection issues and they replaced every piece of equipment between my TV and the box on the telephone pole (I have a long run to the pole).
The guys were local, intelligent, and new a heck of a lot about what they were doing including measuring signal strength as compared to cable modem proximity to my wireless router (Belkin - I'll get back with my first wife before I buy another one of your wireless routers, and Motorola - It's called shielding).My town has various "depots" around town where you can go in and pick up/drop off equipment and talk to people face to face.
The line moves fast and the folks there are a hoot.
Sure, they want to sell you stuff and I keep saying "no".
I have basic cable (only analog channels below 32) and Internet service.So maybe your issues are regional or closer to home.
Or maybe they are based on a previous experience.
I do know that for a company that can tell me to bugger off they treat me well.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147536</id>
	<title>Re:its still comcrap to me</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1266266340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Xfinity sounds like it should be the name of a sports car company... or perhaps an adult film company.</p></div><p>At Comcast, we're all about bringing the content you want, but not necessarily faster.  We're proud of that fact, and thus are rebranding as Xfinity; We bring the Bomp to the Chigga-wow-wow.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Xfinity sounds like it should be the name of a sports car company... or perhaps an adult film company.At Comcast , we 're all about bringing the content you want , but not necessarily faster .
We 're proud of that fact , and thus are rebranding as Xfinity ; We bring the Bomp to the Chigga-wow-wow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Xfinity sounds like it should be the name of a sports car company... or perhaps an adult film company.At Comcast, we're all about bringing the content you want, but not necessarily faster.
We're proud of that fact, and thus are rebranding as Xfinity; We bring the Bomp to the Chigga-wow-wow.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147758</id>
	<title>Re:Xfinity? Sign me up!</title>
	<author>robot256</author>
	<datestamp>1266224400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Guess what, you're in luck!  If you go to Xfinity.com and click "buy" it redirects you to Comcast.com, and offers you the same shitty package (&gt;$100/mo for TV/phone/6Mbps internet).  The plus side is if you already have Comcast, you are guaranteed to have Xfinity coverage!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Guess what , you 're in luck !
If you go to Xfinity.com and click " buy " it redirects you to Comcast.com , and offers you the same shitty package ( &gt; $ 100/mo for TV/phone/6Mbps internet ) .
The plus side is if you already have Comcast , you are guaranteed to have Xfinity coverage !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guess what, you're in luck!
If you go to Xfinity.com and click "buy" it redirects you to Comcast.com, and offers you the same shitty package (&gt;$100/mo for TV/phone/6Mbps internet).
The plus side is if you already have Comcast, you are guaranteed to have Xfinity coverage!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147260</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148524</id>
	<title>Agreed - incompetence == win!</title>
	<author>wsanders</author>
	<datestamp>1266228180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have nothing against Comcast. We had low (analog cable) signal levels a few years ago and the bunglers they sent out coudn't figure out what the problem was, so they just took all the traps out up and down the street and my whole block got free extended basic for free for 6 or 7 years. This only ended a couple months ago when they finally upgraded the neighborhood to digital.</p><p>My employer's commercial service is a different story.  It WAS rock solid stable for three years, until somebody firebombed the local head end last year. Then, it took them a month to get BGP stable. And Comcast still doesn't honor our AS prepending, so we have to go through various kludges to split our incoming routes between Comcast and our other providers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have nothing against Comcast .
We had low ( analog cable ) signal levels a few years ago and the bunglers they sent out coud n't figure out what the problem was , so they just took all the traps out up and down the street and my whole block got free extended basic for free for 6 or 7 years .
This only ended a couple months ago when they finally upgraded the neighborhood to digital.My employer 's commercial service is a different story .
It WAS rock solid stable for three years , until somebody firebombed the local head end last year .
Then , it took them a month to get BGP stable .
And Comcast still does n't honor our AS prepending , so we have to go through various kludges to split our incoming routes between Comcast and our other providers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have nothing against Comcast.
We had low (analog cable) signal levels a few years ago and the bunglers they sent out coudn't figure out what the problem was, so they just took all the traps out up and down the street and my whole block got free extended basic for free for 6 or 7 years.
This only ended a couple months ago when they finally upgraded the neighborhood to digital.My employer's commercial service is a different story.
It WAS rock solid stable for three years, until somebody firebombed the local head end last year.
Then, it took them a month to get BGP stable.
And Comcast still doesn't honor our AS prepending, so we have to go through various kludges to split our incoming routes between Comcast and our other providers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31150784</id>
	<title>Re:I just dropped their service</title>
	<author>blurryrunner</author>
	<datestamp>1266240600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It makes you an XXCustomer. And if you rejoin later, you'll be an XXXCustomer...<br>
<br>
br/</htmltext>
<tokenext>It makes you an XXCustomer .
And if you rejoin later , you 'll be an XXXCustomer.. . br/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It makes you an XXCustomer.
And if you rejoin later, you'll be an XXXCustomer...

br/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148026</id>
	<title>Re:its still comcrap to me</title>
	<author>vjoel</author>
	<datestamp>1266225780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Xfinity sounds like it should be the name of a sports car company... or perhaps an adult film company.</p></div><p>Sup dawg, we heard you like porn so we put xfinity in yo xfinity so you can xfinity while you xfinity.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Xfinity sounds like it should be the name of a sports car company... or perhaps an adult film company.Sup dawg , we heard you like porn so we put xfinity in yo xfinity so you can xfinity while you xfinity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Xfinity sounds like it should be the name of a sports car company... or perhaps an adult film company.Sup dawg, we heard you like porn so we put xfinity in yo xfinity so you can xfinity while you xfinity.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148188</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, and Blackwater is now called Xe.</title>
	<author>Perp Atuitie</author>
	<datestamp>1266226620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But this is different. They had so much to be proud of that they had to start pretending they were somebody else. Only Xfinity was big enough to bear the volume of all the goodness they were so proud of.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But this is different .
They had so much to be proud of that they had to start pretending they were somebody else .
Only Xfinity was big enough to bear the volume of all the goodness they were so proud of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But this is different.
They had so much to be proud of that they had to start pretending they were somebody else.
Only Xfinity was big enough to bear the volume of all the goodness they were so proud of.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147768</id>
	<title>Re:Name change = shame</title>
	<author>syntheticmemory</author>
	<datestamp>1266224460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>At least you're not *killing* your customers.</p></div><p>Unless you have a heart attack over their customer service or get bored to death with the programming.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least you 're not * killing * your customers.Unless you have a heart attack over their customer service or get bored to death with the programming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least you're not *killing* your customers.Unless you have a heart attack over their customer service or get bored to death with the programming.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148454</id>
	<title>Re:Xfinity equals...</title>
	<author>Rewind</author>
	<datestamp>1266227820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I'm not sure why Comcast gets so much hate. Maybe it depends on the local market you are in?</i>
<br> <br>

It does seem to be very much where you live.  I have had awesome luck with Comcast.  Only had to call customer service once and they were out there the next day, replaced my modem and everything was just fine.  Speed is great (well for US cable anyway).  I have tried both the local Knology and AT&amp;T, and both cost more for slower speeds.
<br> <br>
However I have a friend who lives about 20 minutes away who has Comcast and his is awful.  The speed makes it almost unusable between 4-6pm.  Goes down every other day for an hour or so.  Just where you live.  Same with any ISP in my exp.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure why Comcast gets so much hate .
Maybe it depends on the local market you are in ?
It does seem to be very much where you live .
I have had awesome luck with Comcast .
Only had to call customer service once and they were out there the next day , replaced my modem and everything was just fine .
Speed is great ( well for US cable anyway ) .
I have tried both the local Knology and AT&amp;T , and both cost more for slower speeds .
However I have a friend who lives about 20 minutes away who has Comcast and his is awful .
The speed makes it almost unusable between 4-6pm .
Goes down every other day for an hour or so .
Just where you live .
Same with any ISP in my exp .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure why Comcast gets so much hate.
Maybe it depends on the local market you are in?
It does seem to be very much where you live.
I have had awesome luck with Comcast.
Only had to call customer service once and they were out there the next day, replaced my modem and everything was just fine.
Speed is great (well for US cable anyway).
I have tried both the local Knology and AT&amp;T, and both cost more for slower speeds.
However I have a friend who lives about 20 minutes away who has Comcast and his is awful.
The speed makes it almost unusable between 4-6pm.
Goes down every other day for an hour or so.
Just where you live.
Same with any ISP in my exp.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31152414</id>
	<title>Screw Comcast</title>
	<author>Bob\_Who</author>
	<datestamp>1266258240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...really, screw them.  They screw everyone...well, at least they screw all of their customers. Its a corporate greed, lack of ethics thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...really , screw them .
They screw everyone...well , at least they screw all of their customers .
Its a corporate greed , lack of ethics thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...really, screw them.
They screw everyone...well, at least they screw all of their customers.
Its a corporate greed, lack of ethics thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31150540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31149706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31154616
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147378
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31150580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147618
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147776
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31151028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31150784
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31154990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31154842
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148246
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148664
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31156250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31149642
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31150754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147914
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148274
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31152086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148910
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146922
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147726
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31158256
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147672
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31149696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147294
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31150606
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147876
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147200
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31152334
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31151104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147548
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31151318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147600
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147230
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_1829229_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31151460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148084
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147914
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146832
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147522
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148566
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147118
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147200
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146782
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148910
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146948
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148426
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147152
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31149642
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146968
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148948
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31150540
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31151318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147478
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31150580
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148306
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148768
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148524
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148454
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148274
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147792
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31151460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31156250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148382
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147260
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148176
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147108
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146966
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146922
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148266
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147776
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148630
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147618
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31150606
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147190
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147262
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31150784
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148472
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31152086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147492
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147876
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148242
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31151028
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147648
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147258
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31149706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147204
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31149696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31151104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147456
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31158256
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31154616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31150754
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147404
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31152334
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31154842
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31154990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148268
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147294
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147020
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147388
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147824
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147778
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147850
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147378
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147372
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147014
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147072
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147268
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148664
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148246
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31148994
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147726
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147882
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31146810
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_1829229.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_1829229.31147008
</commentlist>
</conversation>
