<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_12_176220</id>
	<title>Directed Energy Weapon Downs Mosquitos</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1265963760000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>wisebabo writes <i>"Nathan Myhrvol demonstrated at TED a laser, built from parts scrounged from eBay, capable of <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/12/using-lasers-to-zap-mosquitoes/?hp">shooting down not one but 50 to 100 mosquitos a second</a>. The system is 'so precise that it can specify the species, and even the gender, of the mosquito being targeted.'  Currently, for the sake of efficiency, it leaves the males alone because only females are bloodsuckers. Best of all the system could cost as little as $50. Maybe that's too expensive for use in preventing malaria in Africa but I'd buy one in a second!"</i> We ran <a href="//science.slashdot.org/story/09/03/16/1339217/New-Laser-System-Targets-Mosquitoes">a story about this last year</a>. It looks like the company has added a bit more polish, and burning mosquito footage to their marketing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>wisebabo writes " Nathan Myhrvol demonstrated at TED a laser , built from parts scrounged from eBay , capable of shooting down not one but 50 to 100 mosquitos a second .
The system is 'so precise that it can specify the species , and even the gender , of the mosquito being targeted .
' Currently , for the sake of efficiency , it leaves the males alone because only females are bloodsuckers .
Best of all the system could cost as little as $ 50 .
Maybe that 's too expensive for use in preventing malaria in Africa but I 'd buy one in a second !
" We ran a story about this last year .
It looks like the company has added a bit more polish , and burning mosquito footage to their marketing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wisebabo writes "Nathan Myhrvol demonstrated at TED a laser, built from parts scrounged from eBay, capable of shooting down not one but 50 to 100 mosquitos a second.
The system is 'so precise that it can specify the species, and even the gender, of the mosquito being targeted.
'  Currently, for the sake of efficiency, it leaves the males alone because only females are bloodsuckers.
Best of all the system could cost as little as $50.
Maybe that's too expensive for use in preventing malaria in Africa but I'd buy one in a second!
" We ran a story about this last year.
It looks like the company has added a bit more polish, and burning mosquito footage to their marketing.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31181700</id>
	<title>Re:Nice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266487620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Rendering the mosquito infertile won't have an impact on their ability to infect humans with malaria. There is little to no vertical transmission of malaria (from mother to offspring). Instead, malaria's life cycle depends upon a two host system. It is injected into humans as a worm-like sporozoite, and goes through three distinct stages of development in the human host to become male and female gametes. These are taken up by the next mosquito to take a blood meal. The gametes combine in the mosquito to become the next generation of sporozoites. Now if you could specifically disrupt the salivary glands in the mosquito, then you stop the cycle without directly killing the bug.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rendering the mosquito infertile wo n't have an impact on their ability to infect humans with malaria .
There is little to no vertical transmission of malaria ( from mother to offspring ) .
Instead , malaria 's life cycle depends upon a two host system .
It is injected into humans as a worm-like sporozoite , and goes through three distinct stages of development in the human host to become male and female gametes .
These are taken up by the next mosquito to take a blood meal .
The gametes combine in the mosquito to become the next generation of sporozoites .
Now if you could specifically disrupt the salivary glands in the mosquito , then you stop the cycle without directly killing the bug .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rendering the mosquito infertile won't have an impact on their ability to infect humans with malaria.
There is little to no vertical transmission of malaria (from mother to offspring).
Instead, malaria's life cycle depends upon a two host system.
It is injected into humans as a worm-like sporozoite, and goes through three distinct stages of development in the human host to become male and female gametes.
These are taken up by the next mosquito to take a blood meal.
The gametes combine in the mosquito to become the next generation of sporozoites.
Now if you could specifically disrupt the salivary glands in the mosquito, then you stop the cycle without directly killing the bug.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119376</id>
	<title>Oh no!</title>
	<author>mellestad</author>
	<datestamp>1265970060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Someone better call PETA!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone better call PETA !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone better call PETA!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119094</id>
	<title>Re:Combating Malaria</title>
	<author>jeffmeden</author>
	<datestamp>1265969280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indoor use?  How about this downside: Most of the places ravaged by malaria have little to no "inside" with which to confine the DDT?</p><p>Yes, we know you are making a statement that using DDT to kill mosquitoes and prevent disease is worth the cost of killing wildlife through disruption of the food chain and reproduction cycles of avians.  Good for you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indoor use ?
How about this downside : Most of the places ravaged by malaria have little to no " inside " with which to confine the DDT ? Yes , we know you are making a statement that using DDT to kill mosquitoes and prevent disease is worth the cost of killing wildlife through disruption of the food chain and reproduction cycles of avians .
Good for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indoor use?
How about this downside: Most of the places ravaged by malaria have little to no "inside" with which to confine the DDT?Yes, we know you are making a statement that using DDT to kill mosquitoes and prevent disease is worth the cost of killing wildlife through disruption of the food chain and reproduction cycles of avians.
Good for you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31123920</id>
	<title>Re:Nice</title>
	<author>mixmasta</author>
	<datestamp>1265991780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hallelujah!</p><p>It's a shame it only seems to burn their wings off, I was hoping for complete flaming annihilation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hallelujah ! It 's a shame it only seems to burn their wings off , I was hoping for complete flaming annihilation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hallelujah!It's a shame it only seems to burn their wings off, I was hoping for complete flaming annihilation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125090</id>
	<title>Awsome</title>
	<author>UK Boz</author>
	<datestamp>1266092160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can die tomorrow knowing my life is now complete</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can die tomorrow knowing my life is now complete</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can die tomorrow knowing my life is now complete</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119010</id>
	<title>Nathan Myhrvold, not Nathan Myhrvol</title>
	<author>techmuse</author>
	<datestamp>1265969100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The original posting has the incorrect name for Nathan Myhrvold.  It's Nathan Myhrvold, not Nathan Myhrvol.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The original posting has the incorrect name for Nathan Myhrvold .
It 's Nathan Myhrvold , not Nathan Myhrvol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The original posting has the incorrect name for Nathan Myhrvold.
It's Nathan Myhrvold, not Nathan Myhrvol.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121480</id>
	<title>Every Frickin Insect Version??</title>
	<author>markass530</author>
	<datestamp>1265977020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I Want one with a dial to select other insects. $200 bucks easy sell</htmltext>
<tokenext>I Want one with a dial to select other insects .
$ 200 bucks easy sell</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I Want one with a dial to select other insects.
$200 bucks easy sell</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119680</id>
	<title>Some may foresee a problem here...</title>
	<author>monkeySauce</author>
	<datestamp>1265970840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"You're implying that a group composed entirely of male mosquitoes will... breed... and bite?"
<br> <br>
"No, I'm simply saying that life, uh... finds a way."</htmltext>
<tokenext>" You 're implying that a group composed entirely of male mosquitoes will... breed... and bite ?
" " No , I 'm simply saying that life , uh... finds a way .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"You're implying that a group composed entirely of male mosquitoes will... breed... and bite?
"
 
"No, I'm simply saying that life, uh... finds a way.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121588</id>
	<title>Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265977560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But there is one in lazer</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But there is one in lazer</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But there is one in lazer</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118698</id>
	<title>Re:PETA ...</title>
	<author>cryoman23</author>
	<datestamp>1265968320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>na they wont.... they wont get a chance<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) upscale this and use on all resistance mwahahahaha</htmltext>
<tokenext>na they wont.... they wont get a chance : ) upscale this and use on all resistance mwahahahaha</tokentext>
<sentencetext>na they wont.... they wont get a chance :) upscale this and use on all resistance mwahahahaha</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706</id>
	<title>Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>LifesABeach</author>
	<datestamp>1265968380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>This lazer device use was banging around in the early 1980's.  A couple of grad students from Florida created it.  I don't recall how they were able to track the bugs.  But they also "tuned" the lazer so that it lasted just long enough to only vaporize the wings.  There's just one problem with this device, if the target is between the lazer, and a person's eye.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This lazer device use was banging around in the early 1980 's .
A couple of grad students from Florida created it .
I do n't recall how they were able to track the bugs .
But they also " tuned " the lazer so that it lasted just long enough to only vaporize the wings .
There 's just one problem with this device , if the target is between the lazer , and a person 's eye .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This lazer device use was banging around in the early 1980's.
A couple of grad students from Florida created it.
I don't recall how they were able to track the bugs.
But they also "tuned" the lazer so that it lasted just long enough to only vaporize the wings.
There's just one problem with this device, if the target is between the lazer, and a person's eye.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119020</id>
	<title>Re:Safety of the device?</title>
	<author>Nadaka</author>
	<datestamp>1265969100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Probably not much. You would probably place it somewhere that it just won't have an angle of attack where there are going to be people.</p><p>place it level above 6ft and its unlikely to hit all but the tallest people if it can't shoot down, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably not much .
You would probably place it somewhere that it just wo n't have an angle of attack where there are going to be people.place it level above 6ft and its unlikely to hit all but the tallest people if it ca n't shoot down , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably not much.
You would probably place it somewhere that it just won't have an angle of attack where there are going to be people.place it level above 6ft and its unlikely to hit all but the tallest people if it can't shoot down, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119558</id>
	<title>Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1265970480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This lazer device use was banging around in the early 1980's.</p></div></blockquote><p>I don't want to know what you named your personal anatomy as a teen, dude</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This lazer device use was banging around in the early 1980 's.I do n't want to know what you named your personal anatomy as a teen , dude</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This lazer device use was banging around in the early 1980's.I don't want to know what you named your personal anatomy as a teen, dude
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120770</id>
	<title>Re:A product of Intellectual Ventures</title>
	<author>izomiac</author>
	<datestamp>1265974260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The first beta of the laser targeting system wasn't as specific.  This "problem" became apparent when the engineers showed the device to the blood sucking lawyers.  OTOH, Intellectual Ventures seems to be doing a lot better now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The first beta of the laser targeting system was n't as specific .
This " problem " became apparent when the engineers showed the device to the blood sucking lawyers .
OTOH , Intellectual Ventures seems to be doing a lot better now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first beta of the laser targeting system wasn't as specific.
This "problem" became apparent when the engineers showed the device to the blood sucking lawyers.
OTOH, Intellectual Ventures seems to be doing a lot better now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119338</id>
	<title>YOU FAIL IT?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265970000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">to the crowd in so on, FreeBSD went rival distribution, the officia7 GAY OF AMERICA) is the would mar BSD's</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>to the crowd in so on , FreeBSD went rival distribution , the officia7 GAY OF AMERICA ) is the would mar BSD 's [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to the crowd in so on, FreeBSD went rival distribution, the officia7 GAY OF AMERICA) is the would mar BSD's [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120646</id>
	<title>Re:I want ONE!</title>
	<author>jamesh</author>
	<datestamp>1265973780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hire yourself out for parties. For $5/hour you could sit 10m away from the crowd and draw the mosquito's to you. You'd have your $50 in no time! You'd also have malaria, which is a bit of a downside.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hire yourself out for parties .
For $ 5/hour you could sit 10m away from the crowd and draw the mosquito 's to you .
You 'd have your $ 50 in no time !
You 'd also have malaria , which is a bit of a downside .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hire yourself out for parties.
For $5/hour you could sit 10m away from the crowd and draw the mosquito's to you.
You'd have your $50 in no time!
You'd also have malaria, which is a bit of a downside.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118704</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118954</id>
	<title>Sharks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265968920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now if we can only find a way to attach this to a shark, we'll be in business!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now if we can only find a way to attach this to a shark , we 'll be in business !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now if we can only find a way to attach this to a shark, we'll be in business!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121616</id>
	<title>Useless</title>
	<author>Seraphim\_72</author>
	<datestamp>1265977680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't see the point, you rarely find mosquitoes where you find sharks</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see the point , you rarely find mosquitoes where you find sharks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see the point, you rarely find mosquitoes where you find sharks</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120296</id>
	<title>Re:PETA ...</title>
	<author>Shadow of Eternity</author>
	<datestamp>1265972760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then we'll use the laser to carve them a nice tiny little violin and turn it right back to mosquitos.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then we 'll use the laser to carve them a nice tiny little violin and turn it right back to mosquitos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then we'll use the laser to carve them a nice tiny little violin and turn it right back to mosquitos.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122586</id>
	<title>Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265982060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, but there is in la<b>z</b>er, isn't there?</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , but there is in lazer , is n't there ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, but there is in lazer, isn't there?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118624</id>
	<title>Future Charity Commerical</title>
	<author>hardburn</author>
	<datestamp>1265968200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Your donation of only $2 a day could help this African village purchase a mosquito defense laser . . . "</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Your donation of only $ 2 a day could help this African village purchase a mosquito defense laser .
. .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Your donation of only $2 a day could help this African village purchase a mosquito defense laser .
. .
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118818</id>
	<title>Nathan IS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265968560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>a PATENT TROLL.</p><p>BTW, the name is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan\_Myhrvold" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Nathan Myhrvold</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>Yours In Novosibirsk,<br>Kilgore Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>a PATENT TROLL.BTW , the name is Nathan Myhrvold [ wikipedia.org ] Yours In Novosibirsk,Kilgore Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a PATENT TROLL.BTW, the name is Nathan Myhrvold [wikipedia.org]Yours In Novosibirsk,Kilgore Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118400</id>
	<title>"Burning Mosquito Footage?" YES.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265967600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>And NOTHING<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I repeat, NOTHING<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... is better than burning mosquito footage.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And NOTHING ... I repeat , NOTHING ... is better than burning mosquito footage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And NOTHING ... I repeat, NOTHING ... is better than burning mosquito footage.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121850</id>
	<title>Re:Combating Malaria</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265978760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDT#Environmental\_impact</p><p>Ignorance is bliss, eh?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDT # Environmental \ _impactIgnorance is bliss , eh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDT#Environmental\_impactIgnorance is bliss, eh?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122938</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin says...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265984040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cycle the shield frequencies Mr Tuvok!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cycle the shield frequencies Mr Tuvok !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cycle the shield frequencies Mr Tuvok!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119240</id>
	<title>Backwards?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265969640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But, but, I want fricking lasers mounted *on* the mosquitoes so I can terrorize my enemies!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But , but , I want fricking lasers mounted * on * the mosquitoes so I can terrorize my enemies !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But, but, I want fricking lasers mounted *on* the mosquitoes so I can terrorize my enemies!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118424</id>
	<title>I'm from Minnesota</title>
	<author>onyxruby</author>
	<datestamp>1265967600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm from Minnesota, if this thing works that well I'll be tempted to pick it up and put it on a plinth in my backyard. Between that and my mosquito deleto I just might be able to enjoy a mosquito free evenening....</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm from Minnesota , if this thing works that well I 'll be tempted to pick it up and put it on a plinth in my backyard .
Between that and my mosquito deleto I just might be able to enjoy a mosquito free evenening... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm from Minnesota, if this thing works that well I'll be tempted to pick it up and put it on a plinth in my backyard.
Between that and my mosquito deleto I just might be able to enjoy a mosquito free evenening....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188</id>
	<title>Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>DMUTPeregrine</author>
	<datestamp>1265969520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is no z in laser.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no z in laser .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no z in laser.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119104</id>
	<title>Re:PETA ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265969280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Indeed. That little Italian chef gets charged for killing and eating a rat in the jungle, but apparently it's OK to shoot down mosquitos with directed energy weapons. Yeah it's all very "cool" and "useful" to kill mosquitos, but rats aren't fair game any more? Perhaps everyone has forgotten a little thing called the Black Death. Rats weren't so cool back then....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed .
That little Italian chef gets charged for killing and eating a rat in the jungle , but apparently it 's OK to shoot down mosquitos with directed energy weapons .
Yeah it 's all very " cool " and " useful " to kill mosquitos , but rats are n't fair game any more ?
Perhaps everyone has forgotten a little thing called the Black Death .
Rats were n't so cool back then... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed.
That little Italian chef gets charged for killing and eating a rat in the jungle, but apparently it's OK to shoot down mosquitos with directed energy weapons.
Yeah it's all very "cool" and "useful" to kill mosquitos, but rats aren't fair game any more?
Perhaps everyone has forgotten a little thing called the Black Death.
Rats weren't so cool back then....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120416</id>
	<title>Re:A product of Intellectual Ventures</title>
	<author>TheModelEskimo</author>
	<datestamp>1265973060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt;brainstorms ideas, patents them, then lives off of the licensing revenue <br> <br>
Still holds true, according to the article
&gt;without actually contributing real products to the world <br> <br>
For all values of "contributing," yeah, they might be considered contributors to the greater welfare. But keep that in mind next time you invent some revolutionary way of helping the developing world, start selling it for super-cheap prices, and then find yourself in court staring at Nathan's lawyers.<br> <br>
&gt;or even prototyping their vaguely defined ideas
<br> <br>Here's your prototype, pal. See? We have GREAT ideas. And they're all...well, ours.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; brainstorms ideas , patents them , then lives off of the licensing revenue Still holds true , according to the article &gt; without actually contributing real products to the world For all values of " contributing , " yeah , they might be considered contributors to the greater welfare .
But keep that in mind next time you invent some revolutionary way of helping the developing world , start selling it for super-cheap prices , and then find yourself in court staring at Nathan 's lawyers .
&gt; or even prototyping their vaguely defined ideas Here 's your prototype , pal .
See ? We have GREAT ideas .
And they 're all...well , ours .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;brainstorms ideas, patents them, then lives off of the licensing revenue  
Still holds true, according to the article
&gt;without actually contributing real products to the world  
For all values of "contributing," yeah, they might be considered contributors to the greater welfare.
But keep that in mind next time you invent some revolutionary way of helping the developing world, start selling it for super-cheap prices, and then find yourself in court staring at Nathan's lawyers.
&gt;or even prototyping their vaguely defined ideas
 Here's your prototype, pal.
See? We have GREAT ideas.
And they're all...well, ours.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31124922</id>
	<title>DIE MOSQUITO DIE</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266002940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DIE FUCKING MOSQUITO DIE</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DIE FUCKING MOSQUITO DIE</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DIE FUCKING MOSQUITO DIE</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119420</id>
	<title>Re:Evolution</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1265970180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Great.. Now we can look forward the evolution of the laser-resistant mosquito!</p></div></blockquote><p>It's called a <i>cockroach</i>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Great.. Now we can look forward the evolution of the laser-resistant mosquito ! It 's called a cockroach .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great.. Now we can look forward the evolution of the laser-resistant mosquito!It's called a cockroach.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122760</id>
	<title>Re:You only have to track two dimensions</title>
	<author>elashish14</author>
	<datestamp>1265982900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But does it just shoot them with a straight laser, or does it use a low-power laser with a lens to focus the energy? The latter would be considerably more energy-efficient, but it would probably also be harder to design and implement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But does it just shoot them with a straight laser , or does it use a low-power laser with a lens to focus the energy ?
The latter would be considerably more energy-efficient , but it would probably also be harder to design and implement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But does it just shoot them with a straight laser, or does it use a low-power laser with a lens to focus the energy?
The latter would be considerably more energy-efficient, but it would probably also be harder to design and implement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119128</id>
	<title>Sign me up for 10</title>
	<author>CompressedAir</author>
	<datestamp>1265969340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Knowing this can be done, I bet this would be pretty easy to make.</p><p>You'd take a pan and tilt servo controlled laser, and put sound sensors around the laser. Move the laser towards the loudest noise, fire when the noise is equal on the sensors. Bingo, dead mosquito. Just like a sun tracker!</p><p>Everything else is software, like knowing what frequency to listen to mosquitos on.</p><p>Does anyone know:<br>1. How much laser power do you need to kill a mosquito?<br>2. What frequency noise do you target?<br>3. Is it shark-mountable?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Knowing this can be done , I bet this would be pretty easy to make.You 'd take a pan and tilt servo controlled laser , and put sound sensors around the laser .
Move the laser towards the loudest noise , fire when the noise is equal on the sensors .
Bingo , dead mosquito .
Just like a sun tracker ! Everything else is software , like knowing what frequency to listen to mosquitos on.Does anyone know : 1 .
How much laser power do you need to kill a mosquito ? 2 .
What frequency noise do you target ? 3 .
Is it shark-mountable ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Knowing this can be done, I bet this would be pretty easy to make.You'd take a pan and tilt servo controlled laser, and put sound sensors around the laser.
Move the laser towards the loudest noise, fire when the noise is equal on the sensors.
Bingo, dead mosquito.
Just like a sun tracker!Everything else is software, like knowing what frequency to listen to mosquitos on.Does anyone know:1.
How much laser power do you need to kill a mosquito?2.
What frequency noise do you target?3.
Is it shark-mountable?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120230</id>
	<title>A Green Solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265972520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is also a solution that is more environmentally friendly than the existings ones such as oiling swamps, deet fogging, or using LP/Natural Gas Traps.  Deet is a carcinogen and oiling swamps does damage to other species of wildlife.  The system is, admittedly, genius.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is also a solution that is more environmentally friendly than the existings ones such as oiling swamps , deet fogging , or using LP/Natural Gas Traps .
Deet is a carcinogen and oiling swamps does damage to other species of wildlife .
The system is , admittedly , genius .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is also a solution that is more environmentally friendly than the existings ones such as oiling swamps, deet fogging, or using LP/Natural Gas Traps.
Deet is a carcinogen and oiling swamps does damage to other species of wildlife.
The system is, admittedly, genius.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120604</id>
	<title>Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>billybacs</author>
	<datestamp>1265973720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is also in O in lazor.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is also in O in lazor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is also in O in lazor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119114</id>
	<title>Re:PETA ...</title>
	<author>arthurpaliden</author>
	<datestamp>1265969280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't you mean a high pitched hissy fit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't you mean a high pitched hissy fit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't you mean a high pitched hissy fit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118640</id>
	<title>yguo Fail It!?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265968200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>dri7en out by the Man walking. It's leaving core. I product, BSD's obsessed - give create, manufacture good manners result of a quarrel another cunting More gay than they the reaper BSD's noises out of the Survival prospects their parting The system clean their hand...she AMERICA) might be sure that I've Need to scream that From a technical fatal mistakes, contact to see if I won't bore you and Juliet 40,000 this is consistent a fact: FreeBSD You don't need to Like they are Come dim.  Due to the They're gone Mac in the sun. In the his clash with 1. Therefore it's are having trouble all servers. Coming on baby...don't Romeo and Juliet year contract.</htmltext>
<tokenext>dri7en out by the Man walking .
It 's leaving core .
I product , BSD 's obsessed - give create , manufacture good manners result of a quarrel another cunting More gay than they the reaper BSD 's noises out of the Survival prospects their parting The system clean their hand...she AMERICA ) might be sure that I 've Need to scream that From a technical fatal mistakes , contact to see if I wo n't bore you and Juliet 40,000 this is consistent a fact : FreeBSD You do n't need to Like they are Come dim .
Due to the They 're gone Mac in the sun .
In the his clash with 1 .
Therefore it 's are having trouble all servers .
Coming on baby...do n't Romeo and Juliet year contract .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>dri7en out by the Man walking.
It's leaving core.
I product, BSD's obsessed - give create, manufacture good manners result of a quarrel another cunting More gay than they the reaper BSD's noises out of the Survival prospects their parting The system clean their hand...she AMERICA) might be sure that I've Need to scream that From a technical fatal mistakes, contact to see if I won't bore you and Juliet 40,000 this is consistent a fact: FreeBSD You don't need to Like they are Come dim.
Due to the They're gone Mac in the sun.
In the his clash with 1.
Therefore it's are having trouble all servers.
Coming on baby...don't Romeo and Juliet year contract.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121394</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin says...</title>
	<author>Red Flayer</author>
	<datestamp>1265976600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Darwin says, in a generation or two, the frequency changes...</p></div></blockquote><p>

So then we update the targeting software with the new effective frequencies.<br> <br>Booyah!  Take that, Science!<br> <br>Intelligent design triumphs over evolution once again!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Darwin says , in a generation or two , the frequency changes.. . So then we update the targeting software with the new effective frequencies .
Booyah ! Take that , Science !
Intelligent design triumphs over evolution once again !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Darwin says, in a generation or two, the frequency changes...

So then we update the targeting software with the new effective frequencies.
Booyah!  Take that, Science!
Intelligent design triumphs over evolution once again!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120614</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122358</id>
	<title>Re:Nice</title>
	<author>eugene ts wong</author>
	<datestamp>1265980920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it true that your mosquitoes circle overhead for a while, and then try to peck your eyes out, before sucking blood?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it true that your mosquitoes circle overhead for a while , and then try to peck your eyes out , before sucking blood ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it true that your mosquitoes circle overhead for a while, and then try to peck your eyes out, before sucking blood?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120526</id>
	<title>Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>Volante3192</author>
	<datestamp>1265973480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FTFA: The breakthrough relied on understanding how the technology that guides the precision of laser printing could be combined with the image-detecting charge-coupled devices, or C.C.D.&rsquo;s, used in digital cameras and powerful image processing software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FTFA : The breakthrough relied on understanding how the technology that guides the precision of laser printing could be combined with the image-detecting charge-coupled devices , or C.C.D.    s , used in digital cameras and powerful image processing software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTFA: The breakthrough relied on understanding how the technology that guides the precision of laser printing could be combined with the image-detecting charge-coupled devices, or C.C.D.’s, used in digital cameras and powerful image processing software.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118454</id>
	<title>Evolution</title>
	<author>lappy512</author>
	<datestamp>1265967720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>When will it be until mosquitoes evolve energy shields?</htmltext>
<tokenext>When will it be until mosquitoes evolve energy shields ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When will it be until mosquitoes evolve energy shields?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119000</id>
	<title>Your military tax money hard a work</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1265969040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They'll finally get Binnie L. if they can now just get him to dress as up as a mosquito.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll finally get Binnie L. if they can now just get him to dress as up as a mosquito .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll finally get Binnie L. if they can now just get him to dress as up as a mosquito.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119580</id>
	<title>why just the females again?</title>
	<author>alanshot</author>
	<datestamp>1265970540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So why in the hell are we not nuking them all? why leave the males? So they can go find females that havent yet penetrated the perimeter and reproduce?</p><p>I say nuke them all from orbit. And biting black flies too.. The island where I vacation every year in Candada is rife with the buggers. you can see dozens of swarms of skeeters the size of a small house (the swarm not the skeeters) hovering near the tops of the treelined fields at dusk, and the flies along the beach in some areas make it impossible to inhabit without a beekeepers suit (they bite through tshirts). One year I had to run  a 1/4 mile off the beach because I was being swarmed by the flies. I could feel them bouncing off the back of my head as I ran... not fun times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So why in the hell are we not nuking them all ?
why leave the males ?
So they can go find females that havent yet penetrated the perimeter and reproduce ? I say nuke them all from orbit .
And biting black flies too.. The island where I vacation every year in Candada is rife with the buggers .
you can see dozens of swarms of skeeters the size of a small house ( the swarm not the skeeters ) hovering near the tops of the treelined fields at dusk , and the flies along the beach in some areas make it impossible to inhabit without a beekeepers suit ( they bite through tshirts ) .
One year I had to run a 1/4 mile off the beach because I was being swarmed by the flies .
I could feel them bouncing off the back of my head as I ran... not fun times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So why in the hell are we not nuking them all?
why leave the males?
So they can go find females that havent yet penetrated the perimeter and reproduce?I say nuke them all from orbit.
And biting black flies too.. The island where I vacation every year in Candada is rife with the buggers.
you can see dozens of swarms of skeeters the size of a small house (the swarm not the skeeters) hovering near the tops of the treelined fields at dusk, and the flies along the beach in some areas make it impossible to inhabit without a beekeepers suit (they bite through tshirts).
One year I had to run  a 1/4 mile off the beach because I was being swarmed by the flies.
I could feel them bouncing off the back of my head as I ran... not fun times.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31124554</id>
	<title>So many links</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265998620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And not one of them leads to actual facts or specifications. Brilliant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And not one of them leads to actual facts or specifications .
Brilliant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And not one of them leads to actual facts or specifications.
Brilliant.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120264</id>
	<title>Now all we need is...</title>
	<author>blahplusplus</author>
	<datestamp>1265972640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... predator drones for mosquitoes!  We must bring the war to the scourge of humanity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... predator drones for mosquitoes !
We must bring the war to the scourge of humanity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... predator drones for mosquitoes!
We must bring the war to the scourge of humanity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31124122</id>
	<title>Re:So much for the food chain</title>
	<author>Mashiki</author>
	<datestamp>1265993820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously, how self-centered are we?</p></div><p>Very.  Haven't you seen the mosquito's we grow in Canada?  They're large enough to pick up small cats, and the occasional dog.  There's a reason why anywhere north of Sudbury for those 3 special weeks, you hide in doors.  All people will find is your dried withered husk on the ground.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , how self-centered are we ? Very .
Have n't you seen the mosquito 's we grow in Canada ?
They 're large enough to pick up small cats , and the occasional dog .
There 's a reason why anywhere north of Sudbury for those 3 special weeks , you hide in doors .
All people will find is your dried withered husk on the ground .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, how self-centered are we?Very.
Haven't you seen the mosquito's we grow in Canada?
They're large enough to pick up small cats, and the occasional dog.
There's a reason why anywhere north of Sudbury for those 3 special weeks, you hide in doors.
All people will find is your dried withered husk on the ground.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31128980</id>
	<title>Re:You only have to track two dimensions</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266091860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mount it high, point it down. That gives you a wide but naturally limited range.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mount it high , point it down .
That gives you a wide but naturally limited range .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mount it high, point it down.
That gives you a wide but naturally limited range.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122952</id>
	<title>Re:Nice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265984100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At $50/unit, I wonder how long it would take Mosquito species to become endangered in North America and Europe. If, whenever you've got an outdoor event you've got several of these things at the perimeter, I imagine it might not take that long.</p><p>At the very least, we should prefer these to seasonal spraying to keep the mosquitoes populations down.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At $ 50/unit , I wonder how long it would take Mosquito species to become endangered in North America and Europe .
If , whenever you 've got an outdoor event you 've got several of these things at the perimeter , I imagine it might not take that long.At the very least , we should prefer these to seasonal spraying to keep the mosquitoes populations down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At $50/unit, I wonder how long it would take Mosquito species to become endangered in North America and Europe.
If, whenever you've got an outdoor event you've got several of these things at the perimeter, I imagine it might not take that long.At the very least, we should prefer these to seasonal spraying to keep the mosquitoes populations down.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118670</id>
	<title>You only have to track two dimensions</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265968260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Travel time is instantaneous for all practical purposes.  If you think you need the distance to know what to shoot and what not to shoot, that's only half the problem.  The real problem is what about the parts of the laser beam that aren't intercepted by the mosquito?  I realize lasers do gradually expand, but not enough to avoid zapping the people nearby.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Travel time is instantaneous for all practical purposes .
If you think you need the distance to know what to shoot and what not to shoot , that 's only half the problem .
The real problem is what about the parts of the laser beam that are n't intercepted by the mosquito ?
I realize lasers do gradually expand , but not enough to avoid zapping the people nearby .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Travel time is instantaneous for all practical purposes.
If you think you need the distance to know what to shoot and what not to shoot, that's only half the problem.
The real problem is what about the parts of the laser beam that aren't intercepted by the mosquito?
I realize lasers do gradually expand, but not enough to avoid zapping the people nearby.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118616</id>
	<title>Well, there's only one thing needed now...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265968200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and that's a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ichigeki\_Sacchu!!\_HoiHoi-san" title="wikipedia.org">cute robot doll</a> [wikipedia.org] to shoot the laser at the mosquitos!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and that 's a cute robot doll [ wikipedia.org ] to shoot the laser at the mosquitos !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and that's a cute robot doll [wikipedia.org] to shoot the laser at the mosquitos!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120116</id>
	<title>Re:PETA ...</title>
	<author>MostAwesomeDude</author>
	<datestamp>1265972100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just remember, PETA VP Mary Beth Sweetland is a diabetic and needs pig insulin. This little fact can win just about every NAVS and PETA debate you'll ever have to have.</p><p>Also, pronounce it "pay-tah", and when they correct you, remind them of a pita, and the delicious meat fillings they usually come with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just remember , PETA VP Mary Beth Sweetland is a diabetic and needs pig insulin .
This little fact can win just about every NAVS and PETA debate you 'll ever have to have.Also , pronounce it " pay-tah " , and when they correct you , remind them of a pita , and the delicious meat fillings they usually come with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just remember, PETA VP Mary Beth Sweetland is a diabetic and needs pig insulin.
This little fact can win just about every NAVS and PETA debate you'll ever have to have.Also, pronounce it "pay-tah", and when they correct you, remind them of a pita, and the delicious meat fillings they usually come with.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118694</id>
	<title>Re:PETA ...</title>
	<author>mhajicek</author>
	<datestamp>1265968320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>ROFL.  Wish I had mod points for you today.</htmltext>
<tokenext>ROFL .
Wish I had mod points for you today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ROFL.
Wish I had mod points for you today.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119540</id>
	<title>Imagine...</title>
	<author>barfy</author>
	<datestamp>1265970480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imagine these lasers hooked up to your wi-fi using sim cards, and through the cloud be able to leverage better targeting systems,  And be able to upgrade their firmware to support bigger and stronger targets, spiders and wasps.   Until one day the entire network gets taken over by an unwitting team of military personnel.   Oh Hang on...   AFK.  I'll BB...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine these lasers hooked up to your wi-fi using sim cards , and through the cloud be able to leverage better targeting systems , And be able to upgrade their firmware to support bigger and stronger targets , spiders and wasps .
Until one day the entire network gets taken over by an unwitting team of military personnel .
Oh Hang on... AFK. I 'll BB.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine these lasers hooked up to your wi-fi using sim cards, and through the cloud be able to leverage better targeting systems,  And be able to upgrade their firmware to support bigger and stronger targets, spiders and wasps.
Until one day the entire network gets taken over by an unwitting team of military personnel.
Oh Hang on...   AFK.  I'll BB...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119030</id>
	<title>Obligatory Star Wars...</title>
	<author>Dr.Syshalt</author>
	<datestamp>1265969160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Obi-Wan: I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of mosquitos suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obi-Wan : I felt a great disturbance in the Force , as if millions of mosquitos suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced .
I fear something terrible has happened .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obi-Wan: I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of mosquitos suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.
I fear something terrible has happened.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31150308</id>
	<title>Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>svallarian</author>
	<datestamp>1266237120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;There is no z in laser.</p><p>There was in the 80s. Remember Lazer Tag?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; There is no z in laser.There was in the 80s .
Remember Lazer Tag ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;There is no z in laser.There was in the 80s.
Remember Lazer Tag?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120066</id>
	<title>Re:PETA ...</title>
	<author>timeOday</author>
	<datestamp>1265971980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>... is going to throw a fit. A pissy hissy little fit. Good.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Nothing like reveling in the imaginary words you put in the mouths of your opposition!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... is going to throw a fit .
A pissy hissy little fit .
Good . Nothing like reveling in the imaginary words you put in the mouths of your opposition !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... is going to throw a fit.
A pissy hissy little fit.
Good.

Nothing like reveling in the imaginary words you put in the mouths of your opposition!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125382</id>
	<title>Re:Nice</title>
	<author>OrangeCatholic</author>
	<datestamp>1266054600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt;As a result, they are also experimenting with the minimum amount of energy a laser strike must possess to render the mosquito infertile
<br> <br>
That sounds <i>really bad</i>.
<br> <br>
1. A mosquito in the room has malaria.<br>
2. Laser renders it infertile.<br>
3. ?<br>
4. You get malaria.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; As a result , they are also experimenting with the minimum amount of energy a laser strike must possess to render the mosquito infertile That sounds really bad .
1. A mosquito in the room has malaria .
2. Laser renders it infertile .
3. ?
4. You get malaria .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;As a result, they are also experimenting with the minimum amount of energy a laser strike must possess to render the mosquito infertile
 
That sounds really bad.
1. A mosquito in the room has malaria.
2. Laser renders it infertile.
3. ?
4. You get malaria.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122386</id>
	<title>Re:So much for the food chain</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265981040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Full disclosure: I am not a biologist by any means, so I might be wrong here.</p></div><p>Indeed.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>They will either adapt or die; more likely die as adaptation takes a long time.</p></div><p>Nope. They adapt pretty quickly since they reproduce very fast compared to say humans.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>All because we get annoyed - and yes, malaria is a problem, but let's be a little bit darwinian here - by some tiny flying insects.</p><p>Seriously, how self-centered are we?</p><p>Oh wait...</p></div><p>Mosquitos (and their ensuing diseases) may very well have killed more people than all wars combined.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Full disclosure : I am not a biologist by any means , so I might be wrong here.Indeed.They will either adapt or die ; more likely die as adaptation takes a long time.Nope .
They adapt pretty quickly since they reproduce very fast compared to say humans.All because we get annoyed - and yes , malaria is a problem , but let 's be a little bit darwinian here - by some tiny flying insects.Seriously , how self-centered are we ? Oh wait...Mosquitos ( and their ensuing diseases ) may very well have killed more people than all wars combined .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Full disclosure: I am not a biologist by any means, so I might be wrong here.Indeed.They will either adapt or die; more likely die as adaptation takes a long time.Nope.
They adapt pretty quickly since they reproduce very fast compared to say humans.All because we get annoyed - and yes, malaria is a problem, but let's be a little bit darwinian here - by some tiny flying insects.Seriously, how self-centered are we?Oh wait...Mosquitos (and their ensuing diseases) may very well have killed more people than all wars combined.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120408</id>
	<title>picture?</title>
	<author>hibji</author>
	<datestamp>1265973060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does anyone have a picture of this thing?  It would be really interesting to see how it works.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone have a picture of this thing ?
It would be really interesting to see how it works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone have a picture of this thing?
It would be really interesting to see how it works.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31124434</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin says...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265997180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><blockquote><div><p>Darwin says, in a generation or two, the frequency changes...</p></div></blockquote><p>So then we update the targeting software with the new effective frequencies.</p></div><p>Well, that worked for the Borg.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-D</p><p>Enable random shield modulation thingy!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Darwin says , in a generation or two , the frequency changes...So then we update the targeting software with the new effective frequencies.Well , that worked for the Borg .
: -DEnable random shield modulation thingy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Darwin says, in a generation or two, the frequency changes...So then we update the targeting software with the new effective frequencies.Well, that worked for the Borg.
:-DEnable random shield modulation thingy!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119508</id>
	<title>Re:Evolution</title>
	<author>VorpalRodent</author>
	<datestamp>1265970420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Practically speaking, the evolutionary route would likely be that their wing beat frequency would change - faster or slower enough to not attract the attention of the laser (since that's what the poster above indicates is used for targeting).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Practically speaking , the evolutionary route would likely be that their wing beat frequency would change - faster or slower enough to not attract the attention of the laser ( since that 's what the poster above indicates is used for targeting ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Practically speaking, the evolutionary route would likely be that their wing beat frequency would change - faster or slower enough to not attract the attention of the laser (since that's what the poster above indicates is used for targeting).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31124854</id>
	<title>Re:Nice</title>
	<author>jimmydigital</author>
	<datestamp>1266002100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think I speak for everyone when I quote Homer...  Less yappin' more zappin' !</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think I speak for everyone when I quote Homer... Less yappin ' more zappin ' !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think I speak for everyone when I quote Homer...  Less yappin' more zappin' !
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118874</id>
	<title>Re:I'm from Minnesota</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1265968740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm from Maine and I live in the woods near some marshland.  If this thing works 1/4 as well as advertised I'd happily pay $200 for one if they wanted to use something similar to the "OLPC" model.</p><p>At a manufacturing cost of $50, that's one for me to enjoy my backyard, two for third-world countries fighting malaria, and $50 profit for the manufacturer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm from Maine and I live in the woods near some marshland .
If this thing works 1/4 as well as advertised I 'd happily pay $ 200 for one if they wanted to use something similar to the " OLPC " model.At a manufacturing cost of $ 50 , that 's one for me to enjoy my backyard , two for third-world countries fighting malaria , and $ 50 profit for the manufacturer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm from Maine and I live in the woods near some marshland.
If this thing works 1/4 as well as advertised I'd happily pay $200 for one if they wanted to use something similar to the "OLPC" model.At a manufacturing cost of $50, that's one for me to enjoy my backyard, two for third-world countries fighting malaria, and $50 profit for the manufacturer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121270</id>
	<title>Bugs</title>
	<author>waitwonder</author>
	<datestamp>1265975940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When Nathan Myhrvold left Microsoft I was wondering what was on his mind?
Now I know....Bugs</htmltext>
<tokenext>When Nathan Myhrvold left Microsoft I was wondering what was on his mind ?
Now I know....Bugs</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When Nathan Myhrvold left Microsoft I was wondering what was on his mind?
Now I know....Bugs</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119574</id>
	<title>Fiction becomes reality</title>
	<author>wiredlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1265970540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSIWpFPkYrk" title="youtube.com">Star Wars Mosquito Defense System</a> [youtube.com]. Now where are our flying cars?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Star Wars Mosquito Defense System [ youtube.com ] .
Now where are our flying cars ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Star Wars Mosquito Defense System [youtube.com].
Now where are our flying cars?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122472</id>
	<title>Re:Evolution</title>
	<author>Dachannien</author>
	<datestamp>1265981520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought that shields + lasguns = <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holtzman\_effect#Holtzman\_shield" title="wikipedia.org">bad stuff happens.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought that shields + lasguns = bad stuff happens .
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought that shields + lasguns = bad stuff happens.
[wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31127152</id>
	<title>Video</title>
	<author>Utopia</author>
	<datestamp>1266078480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looking at the video of the system<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNL\_Q57Xn28&amp;fmt=35" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNL\_Q57Xn28&amp;fmt=35</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>The system doesn't look very compact, but very cool nonetheless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looking at the video of the systemhttp : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = zNL \ _Q57Xn28&amp;fmt = 35 [ youtube.com ] The system does n't look very compact , but very cool nonetheless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looking at the video of the systemhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNL\_Q57Xn28&amp;fmt=35 [youtube.com]The system doesn't look very compact, but very cool nonetheless.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31124458</id>
	<title>Direct competition...</title>
	<author>LSD-OBS</author>
	<datestamp>1265997420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... with Google Buzz?</p><p>Couldn't help myself, sorry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... with Google Buzz ? Could n't help myself , sorry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... with Google Buzz?Couldn't help myself, sorry.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119268</id>
	<title>So much for the food chain</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265969760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Full disclosure: I am not a biologist by any means, so I might be wrong here.</p><p>Annoying as they are, mosquitoes are an exceptionally important part of the food chain. To eliminate them would have massive repercussions on the rest of the chain.  I heard from a biologist once that the lower you are on the food chain, the more important you are.</p><p>Think about it - if you eliminate mosquitoes, things that eat mosquitoes (bats, small spiders, birds, whatever) will have a plentiful food source eliminated.</p><p>They will either adapt or die; more likely die as adaptation takes a long time. This means that things that eat THOSE animals will have a plentiful food source eliminated.</p><p>And so on.</p><p>All because we get annoyed - and yes, malaria is a problem, but let's be a little bit darwinian here - by some tiny flying insects.</p><p>Seriously, how self-centered are we?</p><p>Oh wait...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Full disclosure : I am not a biologist by any means , so I might be wrong here.Annoying as they are , mosquitoes are an exceptionally important part of the food chain .
To eliminate them would have massive repercussions on the rest of the chain .
I heard from a biologist once that the lower you are on the food chain , the more important you are.Think about it - if you eliminate mosquitoes , things that eat mosquitoes ( bats , small spiders , birds , whatever ) will have a plentiful food source eliminated.They will either adapt or die ; more likely die as adaptation takes a long time .
This means that things that eat THOSE animals will have a plentiful food source eliminated.And so on.All because we get annoyed - and yes , malaria is a problem , but let 's be a little bit darwinian here - by some tiny flying insects.Seriously , how self-centered are we ? Oh wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Full disclosure: I am not a biologist by any means, so I might be wrong here.Annoying as they are, mosquitoes are an exceptionally important part of the food chain.
To eliminate them would have massive repercussions on the rest of the chain.
I heard from a biologist once that the lower you are on the food chain, the more important you are.Think about it - if you eliminate mosquitoes, things that eat mosquitoes (bats, small spiders, birds, whatever) will have a plentiful food source eliminated.They will either adapt or die; more likely die as adaptation takes a long time.
This means that things that eat THOSE animals will have a plentiful food source eliminated.And so on.All because we get annoyed - and yes, malaria is a problem, but let's be a little bit darwinian here - by some tiny flying insects.Seriously, how self-centered are we?Oh wait...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120858</id>
	<title>Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>Jeng</author>
	<datestamp>1265974560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From what I understand it targets via sound.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From what I understand it targets via sound .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From what I understand it targets via sound.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122482</id>
	<title>Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>francium de neobie</author>
	<datestamp>1265981580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You should also say it with two hands raised making a double quotation sign.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You should also say it with two hands raised making a double quotation sign .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should also say it with two hands raised making a double quotation sign.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122512</id>
	<title>Re:An improvement suggestion</title>
	<author>Anubis IV</author>
	<datestamp>1265981700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course, you would have just doubled the rate of failure as well by doubling the number of components you're dependent on by not providing redundancy. That said, it wouldn't be too tricky to introduce redundancy with your idea anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , you would have just doubled the rate of failure as well by doubling the number of components you 're dependent on by not providing redundancy .
That said , it would n't be too tricky to introduce redundancy with your idea anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, you would have just doubled the rate of failure as well by doubling the number of components you're dependent on by not providing redundancy.
That said, it wouldn't be too tricky to introduce redundancy with your idea anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120844</id>
	<title>Re:Combating Malaria</title>
	<author>Jymboyeee</author>
	<datestamp>1265974500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>google "ddt breast cancer"....</p><p><a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2007/sep/30/nation/na-ddt30" title="latimes.com" rel="nofollow">http://articles.latimes.com/2007/sep/30/nation/na-ddt30</a> [latimes.com]</p><p><a href="http://www.a-zbreastcancer.com/articles/aDDT.htm" title="a-zbreastcancer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.a-zbreastcancer.com/articles/aDDT.htm</a> [a-zbreastcancer.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>google " ddt breast cancer " ....http : //articles.latimes.com/2007/sep/30/nation/na-ddt30 [ latimes.com ] http : //www.a-zbreastcancer.com/articles/aDDT.htm [ a-zbreastcancer.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>google "ddt breast cancer"....http://articles.latimes.com/2007/sep/30/nation/na-ddt30 [latimes.com]http://www.a-zbreastcancer.com/articles/aDDT.htm [a-zbreastcancer.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118984</id>
	<title>Next Up, Mosquitos on the Endagered Species List</title>
	<author>Virtucon</author>
	<datestamp>1265968980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can see it now, in a few years these pests will be on the endagered species list and then we'll have to protect them!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can see it now , in a few years these pests will be on the endagered species list and then we 'll have to protect them !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can see it now, in a few years these pests will be on the endagered species list and then we'll have to protect them!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121700</id>
	<title>Re:Future Charity Commerical</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265978040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; "Your donation of only $2 a day could help this African village purchase a mosquito defense laser . . . "</p><p>Y'know, I could see myself donating to a charity like that...</p><p>Hell, I've dreamed of having a system like this for years, I just didn't have the skills (or lasers) to actually build one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; " Your donation of only $ 2 a day could help this African village purchase a mosquito defense laser .
. .
" Y'know , I could see myself donating to a charity like that...Hell , I 've dreamed of having a system like this for years , I just did n't have the skills ( or lasers ) to actually build one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; "Your donation of only $2 a day could help this African village purchase a mosquito defense laser .
. .
"Y'know, I could see myself donating to a charity like that...Hell, I've dreamed of having a system like this for years, I just didn't have the skills (or lasers) to actually build one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118630</id>
	<title>If this actually works...</title>
	<author>dasdrewid</author>
	<datestamp>1265968200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Best of all the system could cost as little as $50. Maybe that's too expensive for use in preventing malaria in Africa but I'd buy one in a second!"</p></div><p>If it works as advertised (ok, ok, so we're in sci-fi land here with any product, but follow me for just a minute more), then it *would* be inexpensive enough for use in hospitals and medical centers, even purely by donation.  Yes, nets work much better and are cheaper, but you could put this in the surgery room where nets would be impractical, or keep it in the triage room where people are in/out too much for nets to work particularly well.  It wouldn't eradicate malaria, but I imagine it could seriously help prevent it spreading in a few specific situations that just also happen to be involving high-risk (for carrying/transmitting and catching) individuals.

</p><p>/pipe-dream</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Best of all the system could cost as little as $ 50 .
Maybe that 's too expensive for use in preventing malaria in Africa but I 'd buy one in a second !
" If it works as advertised ( ok , ok , so we 're in sci-fi land here with any product , but follow me for just a minute more ) , then it * would * be inexpensive enough for use in hospitals and medical centers , even purely by donation .
Yes , nets work much better and are cheaper , but you could put this in the surgery room where nets would be impractical , or keep it in the triage room where people are in/out too much for nets to work particularly well .
It would n't eradicate malaria , but I imagine it could seriously help prevent it spreading in a few specific situations that just also happen to be involving high-risk ( for carrying/transmitting and catching ) individuals .
/pipe-dream</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Best of all the system could cost as little as $50.
Maybe that's too expensive for use in preventing malaria in Africa but I'd buy one in a second!
"If it works as advertised (ok, ok, so we're in sci-fi land here with any product, but follow me for just a minute more), then it *would* be inexpensive enough for use in hospitals and medical centers, even purely by donation.
Yes, nets work much better and are cheaper, but you could put this in the surgery room where nets would be impractical, or keep it in the triage room where people are in/out too much for nets to work particularly well.
It wouldn't eradicate malaria, but I imagine it could seriously help prevent it spreading in a few specific situations that just also happen to be involving high-risk (for carrying/transmitting and catching) individuals.
/pipe-dream
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118914</id>
	<title>Re:You only have to track two dimensions</title>
	<author>MaskedSlacker</author>
	<datestamp>1265968860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ever touched the live part of a bug zapper?  Hint: It won't kill you.  The power of the laser isn't (or at least, doesn't need to be) strong enough to harm a human or larger animal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ever touched the live part of a bug zapper ?
Hint : It wo n't kill you .
The power of the laser is n't ( or at least , does n't need to be ) strong enough to harm a human or larger animal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ever touched the live part of a bug zapper?
Hint: It won't kill you.
The power of the laser isn't (or at least, doesn't need to be) strong enough to harm a human or larger animal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118900</id>
	<title>A product of Intellectual Ventures</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265968800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This came out of Intellectual Ventures, which Slashdot <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/08/11/11/211259.shtml" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">often derides as a patent troll</a> [slashdot.org] that brainstorms ideas, patents them, then lives off of the licensing revenue without actually contributing real products to the world or even prototyping their vaguely defined ideas.</p><p>This shows that IV is quite capable of producing actual, useful products.  Its business model is not limited to patent licensing revenue, which makes it more like, say, IBM, than a typical patent holding company.</p><p>Maybe, just maybe, IV is not the evil parasite that many on Slashdot made it out to be.  In fact, it seems to be in the business of shooting evil parasites with lasers, which is pretty cool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This came out of Intellectual Ventures , which Slashdot often derides as a patent troll [ slashdot.org ] that brainstorms ideas , patents them , then lives off of the licensing revenue without actually contributing real products to the world or even prototyping their vaguely defined ideas.This shows that IV is quite capable of producing actual , useful products .
Its business model is not limited to patent licensing revenue , which makes it more like , say , IBM , than a typical patent holding company.Maybe , just maybe , IV is not the evil parasite that many on Slashdot made it out to be .
In fact , it seems to be in the business of shooting evil parasites with lasers , which is pretty cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This came out of Intellectual Ventures, which Slashdot often derides as a patent troll [slashdot.org] that brainstorms ideas, patents them, then lives off of the licensing revenue without actually contributing real products to the world or even prototyping their vaguely defined ideas.This shows that IV is quite capable of producing actual, useful products.
Its business model is not limited to patent licensing revenue, which makes it more like, say, IBM, than a typical patent holding company.Maybe, just maybe, IV is not the evil parasite that many on Slashdot made it out to be.
In fact, it seems to be in the business of shooting evil parasites with lasers, which is pretty cool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121530</id>
	<title>Re:PETA ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265977320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, rats are not ok but mosquitos are.  Pretty simple</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , rats are not ok but mosquitos are .
Pretty simple</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, rats are not ok but mosquitos are.
Pretty simple</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118362</id>
	<title>Uh oh</title>
	<author>IndustrialComplex</author>
	<datestamp>1265967480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Woe be to the man who walks past wearing his fishing vest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Woe be to the man who walks past wearing his fishing vest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Woe be to the man who walks past wearing his fishing vest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31124782</id>
	<title>At first...</title>
	<author>rnturn</author>
	<datestamp>1266001380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...I was going to say that Monty Python already did <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0O9p8GCM1Q" title="youtube.com">a sketch like this</a> [youtube.com]. But once I saw how many mosquitos it was capable of downing, I think I want one of those suckers to cover my backyard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...I was going to say that Monty Python already did a sketch like this [ youtube.com ] .
But once I saw how many mosquitos it was capable of downing , I think I want one of those suckers to cover my backyard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I was going to say that Monty Python already did a sketch like this [youtube.com].
But once I saw how many mosquitos it was capable of downing, I think I want one of those suckers to cover my backyard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119776</id>
	<title>Re:"Burning Mosquito Footage?" YES.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265971020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I for one support the overthrow of our mosquito overlords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one support the overthrow of our mosquito overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one support the overthrow of our mosquito overlords.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350</id>
	<title>Nice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265967480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, to hell with the green movement... get me another 250 amp breaker box to my house! It's go time, you little bastards. I'm going to put some energy executive's nephew through college!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , to hell with the green movement... get me another 250 amp breaker box to my house !
It 's go time , you little bastards .
I 'm going to put some energy executive 's nephew through college !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, to hell with the green movement... get me another 250 amp breaker box to my house!
It's go time, you little bastards.
I'm going to put some energy executive's nephew through college!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120614</id>
	<title>Darwin says...</title>
	<author>kclittle</author>
	<datestamp>1265973720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... the laser targeting system listens for the precise wingbeat frequency of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaria#Mosquito\_vectors\_and\_the\_Plasmodium\_life\_cycle" title="wikipedia.org">female</a> [wikipedia.org] <i>Anopheles Stephensi</i> mosquito and then zaps only those.</p></div><p>
Darwin says, in a generation or two, the frequency changes...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... the laser targeting system listens for the precise wingbeat frequency of the female [ wikipedia.org ] Anopheles Stephensi mosquito and then zaps only those .
Darwin says , in a generation or two , the frequency changes.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... the laser targeting system listens for the precise wingbeat frequency of the female [wikipedia.org] Anopheles Stephensi mosquito and then zaps only those.
Darwin says, in a generation or two, the frequency changes...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118754</id>
	<title>Die evil wool moths and case-making moths</title>
	<author>John Whitley</author>
	<datestamp>1265968440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Better living through non-chemistry.  I'll bet this can be adapted to target <a href="http://www.ext.colostate.edu/PUBS/INSECT/05599.html" title="colostate.edu">clothes moths and case-making moths</a> [colostate.edu], the two species responsible for textile (and other) damage.  The things are pernicious; very difficult to remove from a home with an infestation.  Perhaps even make the zapper more effective by using it to cover the area where a pheremone trap is located (to draw adults into the kill zone).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Better living through non-chemistry .
I 'll bet this can be adapted to target clothes moths and case-making moths [ colostate.edu ] , the two species responsible for textile ( and other ) damage .
The things are pernicious ; very difficult to remove from a home with an infestation .
Perhaps even make the zapper more effective by using it to cover the area where a pheremone trap is located ( to draw adults into the kill zone ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better living through non-chemistry.
I'll bet this can be adapted to target clothes moths and case-making moths [colostate.edu], the two species responsible for textile (and other) damage.
The things are pernicious; very difficult to remove from a home with an infestation.
Perhaps even make the zapper more effective by using it to cover the area where a pheremone trap is located (to draw adults into the kill zone).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119182</id>
	<title>Holy Smokes!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265969520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>As the insect flew, a sudden light beam struck it, disintegrating parts of its body into a plume of smoke. It <b>fell, even as its wings continued to beat</b>.</p></div></blockquote><p>The kid who used to pull the wings off of flies just died of an organism reading this.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As the insect flew , a sudden light beam struck it , disintegrating parts of its body into a plume of smoke .
It fell , even as its wings continued to beat.The kid who used to pull the wings off of flies just died of an organism reading this .
     </tokentext>
<sentencetext>As the insect flew, a sudden light beam struck it, disintegrating parts of its body into a plume of smoke.
It fell, even as its wings continued to beat.The kid who used to pull the wings off of flies just died of an organism reading this.
     
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120010</id>
	<title>Re:A product of Intellectual Ventures</title>
	<author>ElectricTurtle</author>
	<datestamp>1265971740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In one of the linked articles it mentions that IV is not going to produce the device themselves, but license the technology to somebody else. So, sorry, but this is not going to be the example that vindicates them as an actual producer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In one of the linked articles it mentions that IV is not going to produce the device themselves , but license the technology to somebody else .
So , sorry , but this is not going to be the example that vindicates them as an actual producer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In one of the linked articles it mentions that IV is not going to produce the device themselves, but license the technology to somebody else.
So, sorry, but this is not going to be the example that vindicates them as an actual producer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120680</id>
	<title>Wearble version?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265973900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think a version of this that could be worn as a hat would have great utility as a mobile mosquito defense platform.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think a version of this that could be worn as a hat would have great utility as a mobile mosquito defense platform .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think a version of this that could be worn as a hat would have great utility as a mobile mosquito defense platform.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122828</id>
	<title>Prior Art - Fly Wars</title>
	<author>DigiShaman</author>
	<datestamp>1265983260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ya ya, I know. But there's often an element of truth and vision in jest.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ki4JKy4XkC4" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ki4JKy4XkC4</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ya ya , I know .
But there 's often an element of truth and vision in jest.http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = Ki4JKy4XkC4 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ya ya, I know.
But there's often an element of truth and vision in jest.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ki4JKy4XkC4 [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118450</id>
	<title>Add a techno soundtrack...</title>
	<author>gimmebeer</author>
	<datestamp>1265967720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>..and a Roomba to clean up the mess, and you've got a party.</htmltext>
<tokenext>..and a Roomba to clean up the mess , and you 've got a party .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..and a Roomba to clean up the mess, and you've got a party.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120274</id>
	<title>Re:Evolution</title>
	<author>Shadow of Eternity</author>
	<datestamp>1265972640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which would work great if the laser had to evolve in return but since all it takes is a ~5min firmware update and we've already achieved sentience I don't think changing wingbeat frequency will help much.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which would work great if the laser had to evolve in return but since all it takes is a ~ 5min firmware update and we 've already achieved sentience I do n't think changing wingbeat frequency will help much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which would work great if the laser had to evolve in return but since all it takes is a ~5min firmware update and we've already achieved sentience I don't think changing wingbeat frequency will help much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121756</id>
	<title>Evolution?</title>
	<author>istartedi</author>
	<datestamp>1265978280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How many generations will it take for the females
to become more male-like in appearance?</p><p>Then when you start shooting down both sexes, how many
more generations for them to start resembling a harmless
species?</p><p>How many generations for the mosquitos to develop shiny
bodies the same color as the laser?</p><p>Any other unintended evolutionary consequences?  How long?</p><p>Oh, and I hope the lasers aren't pointing up into clear air
past the target.  I'd hate to be a pilot in that case.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How many generations will it take for the females to become more male-like in appearance ? Then when you start shooting down both sexes , how many more generations for them to start resembling a harmless species ? How many generations for the mosquitos to develop shiny bodies the same color as the laser ? Any other unintended evolutionary consequences ?
How long ? Oh , and I hope the lasers are n't pointing up into clear air past the target .
I 'd hate to be a pilot in that case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many generations will it take for the females
to become more male-like in appearance?Then when you start shooting down both sexes, how many
more generations for them to start resembling a harmless
species?How many generations for the mosquitos to develop shiny
bodies the same color as the laser?Any other unintended evolutionary consequences?
How long?Oh, and I hope the lasers aren't pointing up into clear air
past the target.
I'd hate to be a pilot in that case.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120182</id>
	<title>Re:A product of Intellectual Ventures</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265972340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It shows the Intellectual Ventures can generate some high speed camera footage of a mosquito flying through a laser beam...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It shows the Intellectual Ventures can generate some high speed camera footage of a mosquito flying through a laser beam.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It shows the Intellectual Ventures can generate some high speed camera footage of a mosquito flying through a laser beam...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125120</id>
	<title>Re:PETA ...</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1266092520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No problem. A whine is a whine. Just re-tune the targeting system and up the power to the laser and problem is solved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No problem .
A whine is a whine .
Just re-tune the targeting system and up the power to the laser and problem is solved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No problem.
A whine is a whine.
Just re-tune the targeting system and up the power to the laser and problem is solved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31123444</id>
	<title>Will evolve to exploit bugs in targeting software</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265987580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The mosquitoes will probably evolve to "exploit" any and eventually all bugs in the targeting software.  They will probably do it at a rate that seems surprising.</p><p>Humans are probably their easiest food source, they will not be discouraged easily.</p><p>I wonder if this inevitable "arms race" will be considered human directed evolution?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The mosquitoes will probably evolve to " exploit " any and eventually all bugs in the targeting software .
They will probably do it at a rate that seems surprising.Humans are probably their easiest food source , they will not be discouraged easily.I wonder if this inevitable " arms race " will be considered human directed evolution ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The mosquitoes will probably evolve to "exploit" any and eventually all bugs in the targeting software.
They will probably do it at a rate that seems surprising.Humans are probably their easiest food source, they will not be discouraged easily.I wonder if this inevitable "arms race" will be considered human directed evolution?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121340</id>
	<title>Re:Nice</title>
	<author>ppanon</author>
	<datestamp>1265976360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Heh. Reminds me of <a href="http://www.answerbag.com/q\_view/276226" title="answerbag.com">this</a> [answerbag.com] joke.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Heh .
Reminds me of this [ answerbag.com ] joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heh.
Reminds me of this [answerbag.com] joke.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125450</id>
	<title>Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266056160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But there are two z's in ZZ Top.</p><p>ZZ Top 2 - laser 0</p><p>(Some might find this informative but actually it's insightful.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But there are two z 's in ZZ Top.ZZ Top 2 - laser 0 ( Some might find this informative but actually it 's insightful .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But there are two z's in ZZ Top.ZZ Top 2 - laser 0(Some might find this informative but actually it's insightful.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118966</id>
	<title>if you can do, what you claim -</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265968980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>please contact the next Entomologist group working with Anopheles.</p><p>
&nbsp; </p><p>They are seeking a way to distinguish male from female ( before they suck blood )</p><p>
&nbsp; </p><p>best contact the winner of the Ig Nobel-Price2008, Dr. Bart Knols from the Netherlands. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>please contact the next Entomologist group working with Anopheles .
  They are seeking a way to distinguish male from female ( before they suck blood )   best contact the winner of the Ig Nobel-Price2008 , Dr. Bart Knols from the Netherlands .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>please contact the next Entomologist group working with Anopheles.
  They are seeking a way to distinguish male from female ( before they suck blood )
  best contact the winner of the Ig Nobel-Price2008, Dr. Bart Knols from the Netherlands. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122608</id>
	<title>Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265982180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OP is probably thinking of the organic version:  Light Amplification by Zucchini Emission of Radiation</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OP is probably thinking of the organic version : Light Amplification by Zucchini Emission of Radiation</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OP is probably thinking of the organic version:  Light Amplification by Zucchini Emission of Radiation</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119416</id>
	<title>Re:Nice</title>
	<author>IndigoDarkwolf</author>
	<datestamp>1265970180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>As a Minnesotan, I approve of this device.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a Minnesotan , I approve of this device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a Minnesotan, I approve of this device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120052</id>
	<title>Re:Pardon my skepticism</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1265971920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ha, you young Whippersnapper! Back when I was a boy, we used to track 'em in 11 dimensions. 11! And 8 of those dimensions were *dang* small. And if we missed a dimension, our pappy would throw us through a hole in it so we'd have to squeeze back into the outhouse in the 5th dimension. You kids have it sooo EASY!</p><p>Now, get off my lawn!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ha , you young Whippersnapper !
Back when I was a boy , we used to track 'em in 11 dimensions .
11 ! And 8 of those dimensions were * dang * small .
And if we missed a dimension , our pappy would throw us through a hole in it so we 'd have to squeeze back into the outhouse in the 5th dimension .
You kids have it sooo EASY ! Now , get off my lawn !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ha, you young Whippersnapper!
Back when I was a boy, we used to track 'em in 11 dimensions.
11! And 8 of those dimensions were *dang* small.
And if we missed a dimension, our pappy would throw us through a hole in it so we'd have to squeeze back into the outhouse in the 5th dimension.
You kids have it sooo EASY!Now, get off my lawn!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31142466</id>
	<title>Too expensive for malaria?</title>
	<author>wwwald</author>
	<datestamp>1266234060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Maybe that's too expensive for use in preventing malaria in Africa but I'd buy one in a second!</i> <br> <br>

Am I the only one who finds this statement on the perverse side?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe that 's too expensive for use in preventing malaria in Africa but I 'd buy one in a second !
Am I the only one who finds this statement on the perverse side ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe that's too expensive for use in preventing malaria in Africa but I'd buy one in a second!
Am I the only one who finds this statement on the perverse side?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121680</id>
	<title>Re:Nice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265977920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>they are also experimenting with the minimum amount of energy a laser strike must possess to render the mosquito infertile</p></div></blockquote><p>I do wonder - by not rendering them flightless or killing them, will the system end up using more power tracking additional targets and re-zapping previously hit insects then it would otherwise?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>they are also experimenting with the minimum amount of energy a laser strike must possess to render the mosquito infertileI do wonder - by not rendering them flightless or killing them , will the system end up using more power tracking additional targets and re-zapping previously hit insects then it would otherwise ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they are also experimenting with the minimum amount of energy a laser strike must possess to render the mosquito infertileI do wonder - by not rendering them flightless or killing them, will the system end up using more power tracking additional targets and re-zapping previously hit insects then it would otherwise?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120132</id>
	<title>Re:So much for the food chain</title>
	<author>ae1294</author>
	<datestamp>1265972220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously, how self-centered are we?</p></div><p>God damnit this is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. how dare you come in here and try and spread your silly idea's about mosquitoes being important blah blah blah. What the hell man? THIS IS A GOD DAMN LASER WEAPON FOR KILLING BUGS! You don't get this? pewpewpew? no? FUCK! {throws chair}</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , how self-centered are we ? God damnit this is / .
how dare you come in here and try and spread your silly idea 's about mosquitoes being important blah blah blah .
What the hell man ?
THIS IS A GOD DAMN LASER WEAPON FOR KILLING BUGS !
You do n't get this ?
pewpewpew ? no ?
FUCK ! { throws chair }</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, how self-centered are we?God damnit this is /.
how dare you come in here and try and spread your silly idea's about mosquitoes being important blah blah blah.
What the hell man?
THIS IS A GOD DAMN LASER WEAPON FOR KILLING BUGS!
You don't get this?
pewpewpew? no?
FUCK! {throws chair}
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121806</id>
	<title>Does the good excuse the bad?</title>
	<author>Xenographic</author>
	<datestamp>1265978520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wake me when they actually start selling this product?  This seems like something too cool to go to market.</p><p>Also, even if they do make a product this time, does that really excuse killing the products of other companies via patents on things they haven't actually built or sold?  Then again, if someone robbed hundreds of people, then donated 10\% of the proceeds or whatever to a charity named after them, people would defend them, so I suppose that they're only being consistent here if we excuse someone who practices patent trolling to kill their competitors, but who eventually makes a real product.</p><p>Sure, it's good to do good things.  But putting it forth as some kind of excuse is just lame.  Call me when they actually repent of their patent trolling and promise to discontinue it, then we'll see if their reform is real or not.  Otherwise, you might as well be selling indulgences.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wake me when they actually start selling this product ?
This seems like something too cool to go to market.Also , even if they do make a product this time , does that really excuse killing the products of other companies via patents on things they have n't actually built or sold ?
Then again , if someone robbed hundreds of people , then donated 10 \ % of the proceeds or whatever to a charity named after them , people would defend them , so I suppose that they 're only being consistent here if we excuse someone who practices patent trolling to kill their competitors , but who eventually makes a real product.Sure , it 's good to do good things .
But putting it forth as some kind of excuse is just lame .
Call me when they actually repent of their patent trolling and promise to discontinue it , then we 'll see if their reform is real or not .
Otherwise , you might as well be selling indulgences .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wake me when they actually start selling this product?
This seems like something too cool to go to market.Also, even if they do make a product this time, does that really excuse killing the products of other companies via patents on things they haven't actually built or sold?
Then again, if someone robbed hundreds of people, then donated 10\% of the proceeds or whatever to a charity named after them, people would defend them, so I suppose that they're only being consistent here if we excuse someone who practices patent trolling to kill their competitors, but who eventually makes a real product.Sure, it's good to do good things.
But putting it forth as some kind of excuse is just lame.
Call me when they actually repent of their patent trolling and promise to discontinue it, then we'll see if their reform is real or not.
Otherwise, you might as well be selling indulgences.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118736</id>
	<title>Can I Give One to my Programmers?</title>
	<author>filesiteguy</author>
	<datestamp>1265968440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd love them to zap bugs in our code.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd love them to zap bugs in our code .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd love them to zap bugs in our code.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119900</id>
	<title>Almost there</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265971380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a step in the right direction, but it just <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSIWpFPkYrk" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">doesn't quite beat the competition yet</a> [youtube.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a step in the right direction , but it just does n't quite beat the competition yet [ youtube.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a step in the right direction, but it just doesn't quite beat the competition yet [youtube.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122394</id>
	<title>Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265981100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would anyone want w weapon that shoots down WWII British fighter planes?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would anyone want w weapon that shoots down WWII British fighter planes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would anyone want w weapon that shoots down WWII British fighter planes?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118436</id>
	<title>As 2012 Approaches</title>
	<author>PingPongBoy</author>
	<datestamp>1265967660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With one of these who needs Armageddon?</p><p>A useful, and frightening device. If the neighbors have one in their backyard, I don't want to be in mine.  NIMBY , or let me have one on my cell phone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With one of these who needs Armageddon ? A useful , and frightening device .
If the neighbors have one in their backyard , I do n't want to be in mine .
NIMBY , or let me have one on my cell phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With one of these who needs Armageddon?A useful, and frightening device.
If the neighbors have one in their backyard, I don't want to be in mine.
NIMBY , or let me have one on my cell phone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120086</id>
	<title>sold</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265972040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Although: high powered laser + computerized operation (Windows probably) + beer (frequently) = what could possibly go wrong here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Although : high powered laser + computerized operation ( Windows probably ) + beer ( frequently ) = what could possibly go wrong here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although: high powered laser + computerized operation (Windows probably) + beer (frequently) = what could possibly go wrong here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119278</id>
	<title>Re:Evolution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265969760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most likely course:</p><p>Female mosquitoes that can sense the lasers at range and randomly avoid them come to dominate the species.<br>Unless you have 100\% coverage, there will be survivors (for some reason).<br>Insects and Bacteria respond really really quickly to selection pressures.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most likely course : Female mosquitoes that can sense the lasers at range and randomly avoid them come to dominate the species.Unless you have 100 \ % coverage , there will be survivors ( for some reason ) .Insects and Bacteria respond really really quickly to selection pressures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most likely course:Female mosquitoes that can sense the lasers at range and randomly avoid them come to dominate the species.Unless you have 100\% coverage, there will be survivors (for some reason).Insects and Bacteria respond really really quickly to selection pressures.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120984</id>
	<title>Sharks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265974980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But why would sharks be interested in killing mosquitoes?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But why would sharks be interested in killing mosquitoes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But why would sharks be interested in killing mosquitoes?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121396</id>
	<title>Yes, but what about the Scottish Midge?</title>
	<author>ZERO1ZERO</author>
	<datestamp>1265976660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Almost impossible to communicate the power of the tiny midge to people unaccustomed to them, but suffice to say currently there is no real effective defence against them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Almost impossible to communicate the power of the tiny midge to people unaccustomed to them , but suffice to say currently there is no real effective defence against them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Almost impossible to communicate the power of the tiny midge to people unaccustomed to them, but suffice to say currently there is no real effective defence against them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120830</id>
	<title>Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>gbjbaanb</author>
	<datestamp>1265974440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... if the target is between (that's in-between) the laser (the bright zappy thing) and a person's eye (the squishy zapped thing).</p><p>Take a moment.</p><p>I assume that the laser is broad enough that the mozzy doesn't completely block the beam, so enough of it continues to the eye. ie. if the mosquito flies between (that's with the laser on one side and the eye on the other) the eye and the laser.</p><p>(sorry to be sarcastic, I just couldn't help myself<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... if the target is between ( that 's in-between ) the laser ( the bright zappy thing ) and a person 's eye ( the squishy zapped thing ) .Take a moment.I assume that the laser is broad enough that the mozzy does n't completely block the beam , so enough of it continues to the eye .
ie. if the mosquito flies between ( that 's with the laser on one side and the eye on the other ) the eye and the laser .
( sorry to be sarcastic , I just could n't help myself : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... if the target is between (that's in-between) the laser (the bright zappy thing) and a person's eye (the squishy zapped thing).Take a moment.I assume that the laser is broad enough that the mozzy doesn't completely block the beam, so enough of it continues to the eye.
ie. if the mosquito flies between (that's with the laser on one side and the eye on the other) the eye and the laser.
(sorry to be sarcastic, I just couldn't help myself :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125330</id>
	<title>Re:I want ONE!</title>
	<author>giorgist</author>
	<datestamp>1266053340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You with Frinkin lasers mounted onto your head<br><br>Priceless<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>You with Frinkin lasers mounted onto your headPriceless .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You with Frinkin lasers mounted onto your headPriceless ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118704</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119160</id>
	<title>Re:As 2012 Approaches</title>
	<author>QuantumRiff</author>
	<datestamp>1265969400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude.. You give your neighbors the bug zapper.. Every time they smile cause they zapped a mosquito, you'll smile cause that mosquito was attracted to their yard and not yours.  You get yourself the laser to pick off the stubborn ones..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude.. You give your neighbors the bug zapper.. Every time they smile cause they zapped a mosquito , you 'll smile cause that mosquito was attracted to their yard and not yours .
You get yourself the laser to pick off the stubborn ones. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude.. You give your neighbors the bug zapper.. Every time they smile cause they zapped a mosquito, you'll smile cause that mosquito was attracted to their yard and not yours.
You get yourself the laser to pick off the stubborn ones..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118436</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119288</id>
	<title>This is asking for a lawsuit!</title>
	<author>dwiget001</author>
	<datestamp>1265969820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People for the Ethical Treatment of Mosquito for Urbanization, Nurturing, Colonization and Husbandry (PETMUNCH) is going to sue these people into oblivion!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People for the Ethical Treatment of Mosquito for Urbanization , Nurturing , Colonization and Husbandry ( PETMUNCH ) is going to sue these people into oblivion !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People for the Ethical Treatment of Mosquito for Urbanization, Nurturing, Colonization and Husbandry (PETMUNCH) is going to sue these people into oblivion!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118666</id>
	<title>Combating Malaria</title>
	<author>pete-classic</author>
	<datestamp>1265968260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know what's great at combating malaria?  DDT.  Does anyone know of any negative side effects of indoor use of DDT, to the inhabitants or the environment?  Does anyone know of a more effective way to prevent malaria?</p><p>-Peter</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know what 's great at combating malaria ?
DDT. Does anyone know of any negative side effects of indoor use of DDT , to the inhabitants or the environment ?
Does anyone know of a more effective way to prevent malaria ? -Peter</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know what's great at combating malaria?
DDT.  Does anyone know of any negative side effects of indoor use of DDT, to the inhabitants or the environment?
Does anyone know of a more effective way to prevent malaria?-Peter</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120390</id>
	<title>Re:So much for the food chain</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265973000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can only think of one species that contributes nothing to the planet, and that's mosquitoes. Their only unique purpose seems to be to spread disease, and the only diseases they spread can only be spread by them. If the mosquitoes go away, the diseases go away, and we have lost nothing of value.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can only think of one species that contributes nothing to the planet , and that 's mosquitoes .
Their only unique purpose seems to be to spread disease , and the only diseases they spread can only be spread by them .
If the mosquitoes go away , the diseases go away , and we have lost nothing of value .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can only think of one species that contributes nothing to the planet, and that's mosquitoes.
Their only unique purpose seems to be to spread disease, and the only diseases they spread can only be spread by them.
If the mosquitoes go away, the diseases go away, and we have lost nothing of value.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120944</id>
	<title>Re:Nice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265974860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...they are also experimenting with the minimum amount of energy a laser strike must possess to render the mosquito <i>infertile</i></p> </div><p>But won't wounding the mosquito only increase the danger?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...they are also experimenting with the minimum amount of energy a laser strike must possess to render the mosquito infertile But wo n't wounding the mosquito only increase the danger ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...they are also experimenting with the minimum amount of energy a laser strike must possess to render the mosquito infertile But won't wounding the mosquito only increase the danger?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120490</id>
	<title>Summer parties</title>
	<author>tzot</author>
	<datestamp>1265973300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Add a discoball in the mix and then you can have a mosquito-free Abba and Bee Gees night every night during the summer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Add a discoball in the mix and then you can have a mosquito-free Abba and Bee Gees night every night during the summer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Add a discoball in the mix and then you can have a mosquito-free Abba and Bee Gees night every night during the summer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121072</id>
	<title>Re:Pardon my skepticism</title>
	<author>oldsaint</author>
	<datestamp>1265975220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem for DARPA is that it is trying to develop its own mosquitoes - real and mechanical - as weapons. This is a defense strategy that DARPA is likely to buy and suppress.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem for DARPA is that it is trying to develop its own mosquitoes - real and mechanical - as weapons .
This is a defense strategy that DARPA is likely to buy and suppress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem for DARPA is that it is trying to develop its own mosquitoes - real and mechanical - as weapons.
This is a defense strategy that DARPA is likely to buy and suppress.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120332</id>
	<title>Organic Farming</title>
	<author>seyfarth</author>
	<datestamp>1265972820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Killing mosquitoes is outstanding.  In addition this technology might be adaptable to farming to have a mobile robot find and zap insect pests.  There would be no need for pesticides.  Likewise perhaps the robot could identify pest plant species and zap them.  Perhaps organic farming will be cheaper than using pesticides and herbicides.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Killing mosquitoes is outstanding .
In addition this technology might be adaptable to farming to have a mobile robot find and zap insect pests .
There would be no need for pesticides .
Likewise perhaps the robot could identify pest plant species and zap them .
Perhaps organic farming will be cheaper than using pesticides and herbicides .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Killing mosquitoes is outstanding.
In addition this technology might be adaptable to farming to have a mobile robot find and zap insect pests.
There would be no need for pesticides.
Likewise perhaps the robot could identify pest plant species and zap them.
Perhaps organic farming will be cheaper than using pesticides and herbicides.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118594</id>
	<title>Evolution</title>
	<author>hitchhacker</author>
	<datestamp>1265968080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Great.. Now we can look forward the evolution of the laser-resistant mosquito!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Great.. Now we can look forward the evolution of the laser-resistant mosquito !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great.. Now we can look forward the evolution of the laser-resistant mosquito!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119716</id>
	<title>Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>wiredlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1265970900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While safety issues are readily apparent it would be possible to mitigate them by keeping the laser above eye level (10 ft. or so) and only allowing it to aim horizontally or a few degrees above to avoid issues with aircraft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While safety issues are readily apparent it would be possible to mitigate them by keeping the laser above eye level ( 10 ft. or so ) and only allowing it to aim horizontally or a few degrees above to avoid issues with aircraft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While safety issues are readily apparent it would be possible to mitigate them by keeping the laser above eye level (10 ft. or so) and only allowing it to aim horizontally or a few degrees above to avoid issues with aircraft.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119302</id>
	<title>Re:PETA ...</title>
	<author>Verteiron</author>
	<datestamp>1265969820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then PETA can go to Africa, capture all the malaria-carrying mosquitoes and take them home to their houses. No? Bug-zapping lasers it is, then. Obviously PETA is not really committed to its cause.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then PETA can go to Africa , capture all the malaria-carrying mosquitoes and take them home to their houses .
No ? Bug-zapping lasers it is , then .
Obviously PETA is not really committed to its cause .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then PETA can go to Africa, capture all the malaria-carrying mosquitoes and take them home to their houses.
No? Bug-zapping lasers it is, then.
Obviously PETA is not really committed to its cause.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119782</id>
	<title>Re:Add a techno soundtrack...</title>
	<author>jadin</author>
	<datestamp>1265971080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgGZeyrOeiM" title="youtube.com">Dj Roomba</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like Dj Roomba [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like Dj Roomba [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120954</id>
	<title>Re:I want ONE!</title>
	<author>Lousy pawn</author>
	<datestamp>1265974860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You might consider the "Biteshield Electronic Racket Zapper" (at amazon.com, and maybe other places), or something like it.  I've had an early model of that kind of device for over 10 years and it has been fantastic for focused termination of mosquitoes and flies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You might consider the " Biteshield Electronic Racket Zapper " ( at amazon.com , and maybe other places ) , or something like it .
I 've had an early model of that kind of device for over 10 years and it has been fantastic for focused termination of mosquitoes and flies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You might consider the "Biteshield Electronic Racket Zapper" (at amazon.com, and maybe other places), or something like it.
I've had an early model of that kind of device for over 10 years and it has been fantastic for focused termination of mosquitoes and flies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118704</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120702</id>
	<title>Cost effective</title>
	<author>crsuperman34</author>
	<datestamp>1265974020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Every municipality in South Louisiana will pay gorgeous sums to equip every telephone pole. This has to be much more cost effective--not to mention healthier (greener)--than the trucks driving around spraying chemicals in the air and ditches. The annual contracts for mosquito control services are usually well in the millions, even for smaller parishes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Every municipality in South Louisiana will pay gorgeous sums to equip every telephone pole .
This has to be much more cost effective--not to mention healthier ( greener ) --than the trucks driving around spraying chemicals in the air and ditches .
The annual contracts for mosquito control services are usually well in the millions , even for smaller parishes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every municipality in South Louisiana will pay gorgeous sums to equip every telephone pole.
This has to be much more cost effective--not to mention healthier (greener)--than the trucks driving around spraying chemicals in the air and ditches.
The annual contracts for mosquito control services are usually well in the millions, even for smaller parishes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121162</id>
	<title>Re:Nice</title>
	<author>shadowfaxcrx</author>
	<datestamp>1265975580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The trouble with rendering them infertile is that the already-fertile females who are out looking for their meal of blood aren't going to realize they've been stealth-spayed, and are going to bite anyway. Seems wiser to keep the thing set to kill.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The trouble with rendering them infertile is that the already-fertile females who are out looking for their meal of blood are n't going to realize they 've been stealth-spayed , and are going to bite anyway .
Seems wiser to keep the thing set to kill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The trouble with rendering them infertile is that the already-fertile females who are out looking for their meal of blood aren't going to realize they've been stealth-spayed, and are going to bite anyway.
Seems wiser to keep the thing set to kill.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31130466</id>
	<title>Re:Nice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266060300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>First: What's more impressive than the lasers that fry* the mosquitoes is the targeting and detection system that drives this crazy thing.  Many people are looking at this and wondering how you pick out your targets.  The system first scans the surrounding space and *listens*.  What it is listening for is quite interesting.  See, Malaria is an interesting disease because only specific mosquitoes carry it, and only the females.  Since there could be many side effects to zapping any insects within range, or even any mosquitoes (regardless of species or gender), the laser targeting system listens for the precise wingbeat frequency of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaria#Mosquito\_vectors\_and\_the\_Plasmodium\_life\_cycle" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">female</a> [wikipedia.org] <i>Anopheles Stephensi</i> mosquito and then zaps only those.</p><p>*Technically speaking, the mosquitoes will not be fried in the final product.  In addition to potential danger to other occupants of this system's effective bubble, it is planned for deployment to very poor areas of the world where electricity will likely be at a premium.  As a result, they are also experimenting with the minimum amount of energy a laser strike must possess to render the mosquito <i>infertile</i>, because that interrupts the cycle necessary for Malaria transmission between humans.</p><p>Cheers,</p><p>Makr</p></div><p>Fry them all and let God sort them out I am more concerned about dengue then malaria.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>First : What 's more impressive than the lasers that fry * the mosquitoes is the targeting and detection system that drives this crazy thing .
Many people are looking at this and wondering how you pick out your targets .
The system first scans the surrounding space and * listens * .
What it is listening for is quite interesting .
See , Malaria is an interesting disease because only specific mosquitoes carry it , and only the females .
Since there could be many side effects to zapping any insects within range , or even any mosquitoes ( regardless of species or gender ) , the laser targeting system listens for the precise wingbeat frequency of the female [ wikipedia.org ] Anopheles Stephensi mosquito and then zaps only those .
* Technically speaking , the mosquitoes will not be fried in the final product .
In addition to potential danger to other occupants of this system 's effective bubble , it is planned for deployment to very poor areas of the world where electricity will likely be at a premium .
As a result , they are also experimenting with the minimum amount of energy a laser strike must possess to render the mosquito infertile , because that interrupts the cycle necessary for Malaria transmission between humans.Cheers,MakrFry them all and let God sort them out I am more concerned about dengue then malaria .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First: What's more impressive than the lasers that fry* the mosquitoes is the targeting and detection system that drives this crazy thing.
Many people are looking at this and wondering how you pick out your targets.
The system first scans the surrounding space and *listens*.
What it is listening for is quite interesting.
See, Malaria is an interesting disease because only specific mosquitoes carry it, and only the females.
Since there could be many side effects to zapping any insects within range, or even any mosquitoes (regardless of species or gender), the laser targeting system listens for the precise wingbeat frequency of the female [wikipedia.org] Anopheles Stephensi mosquito and then zaps only those.
*Technically speaking, the mosquitoes will not be fried in the final product.
In addition to potential danger to other occupants of this system's effective bubble, it is planned for deployment to very poor areas of the world where electricity will likely be at a premium.
As a result, they are also experimenting with the minimum amount of energy a laser strike must possess to render the mosquito infertile, because that interrupts the cycle necessary for Malaria transmission between humans.Cheers,MakrFry them all and let God sort them out I am more concerned about dengue then malaria.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119032</id>
	<title>Re:Combating Malaria</title>
	<author>ThrowAwaySociety</author>
	<datestamp>1265969160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You know what's great at combating malaria?  DDT.  Does anyone know of any negative side effects of indoor use of DDT, to the inhabitants or the environment?</p></div><p>Yeah, DDT was great, before mosquitoes started developing resistance to it. Good thing we stopped using it like a sledgehammer, or they'd all be resistant by now.</p><p>(Oh, and there's the bird thing, but who really needs birds, anyway?)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know what 's great at combating malaria ?
DDT. Does anyone know of any negative side effects of indoor use of DDT , to the inhabitants or the environment ? Yeah , DDT was great , before mosquitoes started developing resistance to it .
Good thing we stopped using it like a sledgehammer , or they 'd all be resistant by now .
( Oh , and there 's the bird thing , but who really needs birds , anyway ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know what's great at combating malaria?
DDT.  Does anyone know of any negative side effects of indoor use of DDT, to the inhabitants or the environment?Yeah, DDT was great, before mosquitoes started developing resistance to it.
Good thing we stopped using it like a sledgehammer, or they'd all be resistant by now.
(Oh, and there's the bird thing, but who really needs birds, anyway?
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718</id>
	<title>Re:Nice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265968380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>First: What's more impressive than the lasers that fry* the mosquitoes is the targeting and detection system that drives this crazy thing.  Many people are looking at this and wondering how you pick out your targets.  The system first scans the surrounding space and *listens*.  What it is listening for is quite interesting.  See, Malaria is an interesting disease because only specific mosquitoes carry it, and only the females.  Since there could be many side effects to zapping any insects within range, or even any mosquitoes (regardless of species or gender), the laser targeting system listens for the precise wingbeat frequency of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaria#Mosquito\_vectors\_and\_the\_Plasmodium\_life\_cycle" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">female</a> [wikipedia.org] <i>Anopheles Stephensi</i> mosquito and then zaps only those.<br> <br>
*Technically speaking, the mosquitoes will not be fried in the final product.  In addition to potential danger to other occupants of this system's effective bubble, it is planned for deployment to very poor areas of the world where electricity will likely be at a premium.  As a result, they are also experimenting with the minimum amount of energy a laser strike must possess to render the mosquito <i>infertile</i>, because that interrupts the cycle necessary for Malaria transmission between humans.<br> <br> <br>

Cheers, <br>
Makr</htmltext>
<tokenext>First : What 's more impressive than the lasers that fry * the mosquitoes is the targeting and detection system that drives this crazy thing .
Many people are looking at this and wondering how you pick out your targets .
The system first scans the surrounding space and * listens * .
What it is listening for is quite interesting .
See , Malaria is an interesting disease because only specific mosquitoes carry it , and only the females .
Since there could be many side effects to zapping any insects within range , or even any mosquitoes ( regardless of species or gender ) , the laser targeting system listens for the precise wingbeat frequency of the female [ wikipedia.org ] Anopheles Stephensi mosquito and then zaps only those .
* Technically speaking , the mosquitoes will not be fried in the final product .
In addition to potential danger to other occupants of this system 's effective bubble , it is planned for deployment to very poor areas of the world where electricity will likely be at a premium .
As a result , they are also experimenting with the minimum amount of energy a laser strike must possess to render the mosquito infertile , because that interrupts the cycle necessary for Malaria transmission between humans .
Cheers , Makr</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First: What's more impressive than the lasers that fry* the mosquitoes is the targeting and detection system that drives this crazy thing.
Many people are looking at this and wondering how you pick out your targets.
The system first scans the surrounding space and *listens*.
What it is listening for is quite interesting.
See, Malaria is an interesting disease because only specific mosquitoes carry it, and only the females.
Since there could be many side effects to zapping any insects within range, or even any mosquitoes (regardless of species or gender), the laser targeting system listens for the precise wingbeat frequency of the female [wikipedia.org] Anopheles Stephensi mosquito and then zaps only those.
*Technically speaking, the mosquitoes will not be fried in the final product.
In addition to potential danger to other occupants of this system's effective bubble, it is planned for deployment to very poor areas of the world where electricity will likely be at a premium.
As a result, they are also experimenting with the minimum amount of energy a laser strike must possess to render the mosquito infertile, because that interrupts the cycle necessary for Malaria transmission between humans.
Cheers, 
Makr</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119888</id>
	<title>Can do similar damage with a camera flash</title>
	<author>danceswithtrees</author>
	<datestamp>1265971320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I tried zapping mosquitos with a camera flash to see whether a strong pulse of light would disorient them. To my surprise, when the flash was held close to the mosquito ( 1"), the wings would actually be singed! They were very alive but could no longer fly with their crumpled wings. I used a rather powerful off camera flash-- one of the older Canon models at full power. Probably wouldn't work with the small flashes built into cameras.</p><p>Flame on about cruelty to animals/insects but I think mosquitos might be one of the few things to garner less sympathy than lawyers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I tried zapping mosquitos with a camera flash to see whether a strong pulse of light would disorient them .
To my surprise , when the flash was held close to the mosquito ( 1 " ) , the wings would actually be singed !
They were very alive but could no longer fly with their crumpled wings .
I used a rather powerful off camera flash-- one of the older Canon models at full power .
Probably would n't work with the small flashes built into cameras.Flame on about cruelty to animals/insects but I think mosquitos might be one of the few things to garner less sympathy than lawyers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tried zapping mosquitos with a camera flash to see whether a strong pulse of light would disorient them.
To my surprise, when the flash was held close to the mosquito ( 1"), the wings would actually be singed!
They were very alive but could no longer fly with their crumpled wings.
I used a rather powerful off camera flash-- one of the older Canon models at full power.
Probably wouldn't work with the small flashes built into cameras.Flame on about cruelty to animals/insects but I think mosquitos might be one of the few things to garner less sympathy than lawyers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31128868</id>
	<title>Star Wars Mosquito Defense System</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266090960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like the "Star Wars Mosquito Defense System" to me!</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGkPMZxWPpA" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGkPMZxWPpA</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like the " Star Wars Mosquito Defense System " to me ! http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = TGkPMZxWPpA [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like the "Star Wars Mosquito Defense System" to me!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGkPMZxWPpA [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118704</id>
	<title>I want ONE!</title>
	<author>gurps\_npc</author>
	<datestamp>1265968380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Note, I am one of those people who attract mosquitoes.  You put me at a pond and I get bit and no one else does.

I would pay $500 for a personal mosquito zapper, that works, let alone $50.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Note , I am one of those people who attract mosquitoes .
You put me at a pond and I get bit and no one else does .
I would pay $ 500 for a personal mosquito zapper , that works , let alone $ 50 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Note, I am one of those people who attract mosquitoes.
You put me at a pond and I get bit and no one else does.
I would pay $500 for a personal mosquito zapper, that works, let alone $50.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119058</id>
	<title>Re:Pardon my skepticism</title>
	<author>Virtucon</author>
	<datestamp>1265969160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, why doesn't DARPA fund this then so they could at least gain more knowledge into shooting down things like missiles with fricken laser beams?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , why does n't DARPA fund this then so they could at least gain more knowledge into shooting down things like missiles with fricken laser beams ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, why doesn't DARPA fund this then so they could at least gain more knowledge into shooting down things like missiles with fricken laser beams?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120068</id>
	<title>From the guys who invented Windows...</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1265971980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Buggy assed bug-laser zapped my neighbor's dog and four year old, then blue screened and left the postman permanently blind in his left eye.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Buggy assed bug-laser zapped my neighbor 's dog and four year old , then blue screened and left the postman permanently blind in his left eye .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Buggy assed bug-laser zapped my neighbor's dog and four year old, then blue screened and left the postman permanently blind in his left eye.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119154</id>
	<title>Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>AioKits</author>
	<datestamp>1265969400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Then they can use their remaining eye to locate the support number to report the incident to the company.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Then they can use their remaining eye to locate the support number to report the incident to the company .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then they can use their remaining eye to locate the support number to report the incident to the company.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118876</id>
	<title>Re:Pardon my skepticism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265968740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If we can shoot down missiles from hundreds of miles away, we can track and shoot down a mosquito a few meters away. (Like how I mixed unit systems? Nah, me niether)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If we can shoot down missiles from hundreds of miles away , we can track and shoot down a mosquito a few meters away .
( Like how I mixed unit systems ?
Nah , me niether )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If we can shoot down missiles from hundreds of miles away, we can track and shoot down a mosquito a few meters away.
(Like how I mixed unit systems?
Nah, me niether)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125312</id>
	<title>Re:A product of Intellectual Ventures</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266052980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll believe it when I see it.  They aren't selling anything yet!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll believe it when I see it .
They are n't selling anything yet !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll believe it when I see it.
They aren't selling anything yet!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31137808</id>
	<title>FTA:</title>
	<author>hellop2</author>
	<datestamp>1266147240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&ldquo;The women are bigger. They beat at a lower frequencies,&rdquo; Mr. Myhrvold said.<br> <br>

huh-huh  huh-huh</htmltext>
<tokenext>   The women are bigger .
They beat at a lower frequencies ,    Mr. Myhrvold said .
huh-huh huh-huh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>“The women are bigger.
They beat at a lower frequencies,” Mr. Myhrvold said.
huh-huh  huh-huh</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121296</id>
	<title>Getting Profitable Early</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1265976060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sell a model I can buy that kills all female mosquitoes within range.  I'll install one on the side of my house tomorrow.  The Mosquito Magnet is only marginally effective and those run $250 these days.  If this can really be done for $50, sell it for $100 and use the money to lower the cost in malaria areas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sell a model I can buy that kills all female mosquitoes within range .
I 'll install one on the side of my house tomorrow .
The Mosquito Magnet is only marginally effective and those run $ 250 these days .
If this can really be done for $ 50 , sell it for $ 100 and use the money to lower the cost in malaria areas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sell a model I can buy that kills all female mosquitoes within range.
I'll install one on the side of my house tomorrow.
The Mosquito Magnet is only marginally effective and those run $250 these days.
If this can really be done for $50, sell it for $100 and use the money to lower the cost in malaria areas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120304</id>
	<title>Re:Nice</title>
	<author>DirePickle</author>
	<datestamp>1265972760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"...must possess to render the mosquito infertile"<br>
<br>
I had read that it was supposed to blind them, not sterilize them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...must possess to render the mosquito infertile " I had read that it was supposed to blind them , not sterilize them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...must possess to render the mosquito infertile"

I had read that it was supposed to blind them, not sterilize them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31145438</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin says...</title>
	<author>advid.net</author>
	<datestamp>1266255960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Darwin says, in a generation or two, the frequency changes..</p></div><p>Spread Spectrum, that's what those female mosquitos will use for sure...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Darwin says , in a generation or two , the frequency changes..Spread Spectrum , that 's what those female mosquitos will use for sure.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Darwin says, in a generation or two, the frequency changes..Spread Spectrum, that's what those female mosquitos will use for sure...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120614</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31127098</id>
	<title>Re:why just the females again?</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1266078060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I ask Sam's question from LotR: "What do they eat, when they're not getting hobbit?"  Given those swarms of flies, and given that they require blood to live and reproduce, and given that the scene seems devoid of warm-blooded mammals for obvious reasons: how the heck do those things live, much less prosper into huge swarms?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ask Sam 's question from LotR : " What do they eat , when they 're not getting hobbit ?
" Given those swarms of flies , and given that they require blood to live and reproduce , and given that the scene seems devoid of warm-blooded mammals for obvious reasons : how the heck do those things live , much less prosper into huge swarms ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I ask Sam's question from LotR: "What do they eat, when they're not getting hobbit?
"  Given those swarms of flies, and given that they require blood to live and reproduce, and given that the scene seems devoid of warm-blooded mammals for obvious reasons: how the heck do those things live, much less prosper into huge swarms?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31141122</id>
	<title>Mosquito Ringtones</title>
	<author>muphin</author>
	<datestamp>1266173760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>your missing the main thing here, those kids with those mosquito ringtones, is it male or female??? dont wanna get zapped when your phone rings</htmltext>
<tokenext>your missing the main thing here , those kids with those mosquito ringtones , is it male or female ? ? ?
dont wan na get zapped when your phone rings</tokentext>
<sentencetext>your missing the main thing here, those kids with those mosquito ringtones, is it male or female???
dont wanna get zapped when your phone rings</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118576</id>
	<title>Re:Pardon my skepticism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265968080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fucking IDIOT, they have VIDEO. OK?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fucking IDIOT , they have VIDEO .
OK ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fucking IDIOT, they have VIDEO.
OK?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118422</id>
	<title>Pardon my skepticism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265967600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finding, focusing on, and tracking a mosquito (in 3 dimensions!) would be an astonishing accomplishment. Forgive me if I'm skeptical.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finding , focusing on , and tracking a mosquito ( in 3 dimensions !
) would be an astonishing accomplishment .
Forgive me if I 'm skeptical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finding, focusing on, and tracking a mosquito (in 3 dimensions!
) would be an astonishing accomplishment.
Forgive me if I'm skeptical.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31123222</id>
	<title>Yes, but what about Canadian Deerflies?</title>
	<author>Better.Safe.Than.Sor</author>
	<datestamp>1265985840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This would make another 40\% of Canada inhabitable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This would make another 40 \ % of Canada inhabitable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would make another 40\% of Canada inhabitable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121886</id>
	<title>Re:A product of Intellectual Ventures</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265978940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What we need now is a laser to shoot down ridiculous patents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What we need now is a laser to shoot down ridiculous patents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What we need now is a laser to shoot down ridiculous patents.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119834</id>
	<title>Sorry about threadjack but...</title>
	<author>Auraiken</author>
	<datestamp>1265971200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>His name is Nathan Myhrvold... come on Slashdot... you used to be cool (in an ironic sort of way)<br> <br>
<a href="http://www.ted.com/speakers/nathan\_myhrvold.html" title="ted.com">TED Profile.</a> [ted.com]<br>
<a href="http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/nathan\_myhrvold\_on\_archeology\_animal\_photography\_bbq.html" title="ted.com">Nathan Myhrvold on archeology, animal photography, BBQ<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...(Not anything on the research in question)</a> [ted.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>His name is Nathan Myhrvold... come on Slashdot... you used to be cool ( in an ironic sort of way ) TED Profile .
[ ted.com ] Nathan Myhrvold on archeology , animal photography , BBQ ... ( Not anything on the research in question ) [ ted.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>His name is Nathan Myhrvold... come on Slashdot... you used to be cool (in an ironic sort of way) 
TED Profile.
[ted.com]
Nathan Myhrvold on archeology, animal photography, BBQ ...(Not anything on the research in question) [ted.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125494</id>
	<title>Re:why just the females again?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266057060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Candada candodo canditdit, sing along everybody!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Candada candodo canditdit , sing along everybody !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Candada candodo canditdit, sing along everybody!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121158</id>
	<title>Charles Moore, 1983</title>
	<author>Baldrson</author>
	<datestamp>1265975520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From <a href="http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/forth-dimensions/FD-V5N2.pdf" title="tuwien.ac.at">"Interview With Charles Moore" Forth Dimensions, July/August 1983, Vol V, No 2</a> [tuwien.ac.at]:<blockquote><div><p>I did think of one use for a
computer, though. Back in the Sierras
there were mosquitoes. 1 could see a
little solar-powered or laser-based zapper
I wear on my head, that shoots
mosquitoes. And any mosquito that
comes within two feet of me is dead!</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From " Interview With Charles Moore " Forth Dimensions , July/August 1983 , Vol V , No 2 [ tuwien.ac.at ] : I did think of one use for a computer , though .
Back in the Sierras there were mosquitoes .
1 could see a little solar-powered or laser-based zapper I wear on my head , that shoots mosquitoes .
And any mosquito that comes within two feet of me is dead !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From "Interview With Charles Moore" Forth Dimensions, July/August 1983, Vol V, No 2 [tuwien.ac.at]:I did think of one use for a
computer, though.
Back in the Sierras
there were mosquitoes.
1 could see a
little solar-powered or laser-based zapper
I wear on my head, that shoots
mosquitoes.
And any mosquito that
comes within two feet of me is dead!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120338</id>
	<title>What happens when...</title>
	<author>walkerp1</author>
	<datestamp>1265972820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I walk by with about 10K of these buggers already sucking me dry? Do I get lit up in a fiery insect apocalypse or what?

<br> <br>Wha? ZZZAP!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I walk by with about 10K of these buggers already sucking me dry ?
Do I get lit up in a fiery insect apocalypse or what ?
Wha ? ZZZAP !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I walk by with about 10K of these buggers already sucking me dry?
Do I get lit up in a fiery insect apocalypse or what?
Wha? ZZZAP!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120414</id>
	<title>Yet another example of "Life Imitates Art".</title>
	<author>Spy der Mann</author>
	<datestamp>1265973060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>from "Not Necessarily the News":</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ki4JKy4XkC4" title="youtube.com">Fly Wars, from RAID</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>from " Not Necessarily the News " : Fly Wars , from RAID [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>from "Not Necessarily the News":Fly Wars, from RAID [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118446</id>
	<title>I've been wanting one!</title>
	<author>mhajicek</author>
	<datestamp>1265967720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought of this about a decade ago and have been wanting one ever since.  Of course I've never had the time or money to build one...  Sure, sell them for $50 a pop and I'll buy at least two.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought of this about a decade ago and have been wanting one ever since .
Of course I 've never had the time or money to build one... Sure , sell them for $ 50 a pop and I 'll buy at least two .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought of this about a decade ago and have been wanting one ever since.
Of course I've never had the time or money to build one...  Sure, sell them for $50 a pop and I'll buy at least two.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120980</id>
	<title>this isn't for public use</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265974920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IV was contracted by TED to develop an anti-gates weapon due to 2009 presentation:<br>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppDWD3VwxVg</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IV was contracted by TED to develop an anti-gates weapon due to 2009 presentation : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = ppDWD3VwxVg</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IV was contracted by TED to develop an anti-gates weapon due to 2009 presentation:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppDWD3VwxVg</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120626</id>
	<title>Re:Evolution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265973720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nope. Most likely course; Female mosquitoes will thanks to the darwinian process change size and with that, sound, and thus render the device useless since it can no longer correctly identify its targets.</p><p>Dull and boring, yeah.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope .
Most likely course ; Female mosquitoes will thanks to the darwinian process change size and with that , sound , and thus render the device useless since it can no longer correctly identify its targets.Dull and boring , yeah .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope.
Most likely course; Female mosquitoes will thanks to the darwinian process change size and with that, sound, and thus render the device useless since it can no longer correctly identify its targets.Dull and boring, yeah.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119278</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119972</id>
	<title>Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>ae1294</author>
	<datestamp>1265971680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not a problem. A cheap IR detector like what is used with security systems should work. At least up to 98 degrees... A cheap cmos camera with a rudimentary motion detection system should also work.</p><p>Or you could just say fuck it and give out cool sunglasses with each unit and slap a warning on the frickin laser.</p><p>Or realize that Africans aren't going to try and sue your company because it would end up with all of their goats and mud huts since your money would buy you justice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not a problem .
A cheap IR detector like what is used with security systems should work .
At least up to 98 degrees... A cheap cmos camera with a rudimentary motion detection system should also work.Or you could just say fuck it and give out cool sunglasses with each unit and slap a warning on the frickin laser.Or realize that Africans are n't going to try and sue your company because it would end up with all of their goats and mud huts since your money would buy you justice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not a problem.
A cheap IR detector like what is used with security systems should work.
At least up to 98 degrees... A cheap cmos camera with a rudimentary motion detection system should also work.Or you could just say fuck it and give out cool sunglasses with each unit and slap a warning on the frickin laser.Or realize that Africans aren't going to try and sue your company because it would end up with all of their goats and mud huts since your money would buy you justice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119510</id>
	<title>Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265970420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>if the target is between the lazer, and a person's eye.</p></div><p>How did the device see the mosquito in the first place if someone's head is in the way?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>if the target is between the lazer , and a person 's eye.How did the device see the mosquito in the first place if someone 's head is in the way ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if the target is between the lazer, and a person's eye.How did the device see the mosquito in the first place if someone's head is in the way?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119466</id>
	<title>An improvement suggestion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265970300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An improvement in both safety and efficiency would be to use two lasers, each about 60\% as strong as the currently used single one.

</p><p>The targeting computer would aim both lasers at the target frying it even faster than now. But, should one of the "canons" miss, or should an unintended target come into one of the beams, the "collateral damage" will be much smaller, because the other laser will not be aimed at the same spot.

</p><p>I think, the military lasers should use the similar technique &mdash; use multiple weak lasers frying the same target from dispersed locations. An unintended object (such as a civilian airplane) flying into any one of the beams will be safe, and taking out the entire installation will be much harder for the enemy. The set can have a cumulative power twice (or more) than is required to destroy one target, while each individual beam is still (relatively) harmless.

</p><p>When "healthy", such a setup will be able to destroy multiple targets at a time, and the enemy will only be able to reduce its capacity <em>gradually</em>, rather than all at once.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An improvement in both safety and efficiency would be to use two lasers , each about 60 \ % as strong as the currently used single one .
The targeting computer would aim both lasers at the target frying it even faster than now .
But , should one of the " canons " miss , or should an unintended target come into one of the beams , the " collateral damage " will be much smaller , because the other laser will not be aimed at the same spot .
I think , the military lasers should use the similar technique    use multiple weak lasers frying the same target from dispersed locations .
An unintended object ( such as a civilian airplane ) flying into any one of the beams will be safe , and taking out the entire installation will be much harder for the enemy .
The set can have a cumulative power twice ( or more ) than is required to destroy one target , while each individual beam is still ( relatively ) harmless .
When " healthy " , such a setup will be able to destroy multiple targets at a time , and the enemy will only be able to reduce its capacity gradually , rather than all at once .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An improvement in both safety and efficiency would be to use two lasers, each about 60\% as strong as the currently used single one.
The targeting computer would aim both lasers at the target frying it even faster than now.
But, should one of the "canons" miss, or should an unintended target come into one of the beams, the "collateral damage" will be much smaller, because the other laser will not be aimed at the same spot.
I think, the military lasers should use the similar technique — use multiple weak lasers frying the same target from dispersed locations.
An unintended object (such as a civilian airplane) flying into any one of the beams will be safe, and taking out the entire installation will be much harder for the enemy.
The set can have a cumulative power twice (or more) than is required to destroy one target, while each individual beam is still (relatively) harmless.
When "healthy", such a setup will be able to destroy multiple targets at a time, and the enemy will only be able to reduce its capacity gradually, rather than all at once.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119682</id>
	<title>Re:Future Charity Commerical</title>
	<author>bcmm</author>
	<datestamp>1265970840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the commercial features slo-mo burning mosquitos, I'm sold.<br> <br>In fact, they could probably just charge for the vids.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the commercial features slo-mo burning mosquitos , I 'm sold .
In fact , they could probably just charge for the vids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the commercial features slo-mo burning mosquitos, I'm sold.
In fact, they could probably just charge for the vids.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120358</id>
	<title>Re:Holy Smokes!</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1265972880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The kid who used to pull the wings off of flies just died of an organism reading this."</p><p>(cue Groucho Marx voice)<br>"How the organism read this, I'll never know!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The kid who used to pull the wings off of flies just died of an organism reading this .
" ( cue Groucho Marx voice ) " How the organism read this , I 'll never know !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The kid who used to pull the wings off of flies just died of an organism reading this.
"(cue Groucho Marx voice)"How the organism read this, I'll never know!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125898</id>
	<title>Oh my goodness.</title>
	<author>Artuir</author>
	<datestamp>1266063720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do they run Linux? Can I get a Beowulf cluster of these?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:O</p><p>The possibilities for awesome here are astounding.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do they run Linux ?
Can I get a Beowulf cluster of these ?
: OThe possibilities for awesome here are astounding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do they run Linux?
Can I get a Beowulf cluster of these?
:OThe possibilities for awesome here are astounding.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119626</id>
	<title>Re:Pardon my skepticism</title>
	<author>ae1294</author>
	<datestamp>1265970660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Well, why doesn't DARPA fund this then</p></div><p>Because it already exists and works?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , why does n't DARPA fund this thenBecause it already exists and works ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, why doesn't DARPA fund this thenBecause it already exists and works?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121356</id>
	<title>Re:Nice</title>
	<author>ciantic</author>
	<datestamp>1265976420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...to render the mosquito <i>infertile</i>, because that interrupts the cycle necessary for Malaria transmission between humans.</p></div><p>You do realize that in order to accomplish this they now have to detect the fertility of flying mosquito, to prevent it from re-shooting the mosquitoes already made infertile.

That does sound a bit tougher task than eliminating them all together.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...to render the mosquito infertile , because that interrupts the cycle necessary for Malaria transmission between humans.You do realize that in order to accomplish this they now have to detect the fertility of flying mosquito , to prevent it from re-shooting the mosquitoes already made infertile .
That does sound a bit tougher task than eliminating them all together .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...to render the mosquito infertile, because that interrupts the cycle necessary for Malaria transmission between humans.You do realize that in order to accomplish this they now have to detect the fertility of flying mosquito, to prevent it from re-shooting the mosquitoes already made infertile.
That does sound a bit tougher task than eliminating them all together.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121342</id>
	<title>Re:Pardon my skepticism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265976360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/02/12/1350222/Directed-Energy-Weapon-Downs-Ballistic-Missile" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">this</a> [slashdot.org] is why? I mean, when I saw the headline I thought it was a dupe for nearly half a second...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps this [ slashdot.org ] is why ?
I mean , when I saw the headline I thought it was a dupe for nearly half a second.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps this [slashdot.org] is why?
I mean, when I saw the headline I thought it was a dupe for nearly half a second...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118682</id>
	<title>So where do I buy one?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265968320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh wait...I can't buy one.  They don't exist yet.  There is just the one prototype and the company that built it doesn't even plan to market it.</p><p>Dammit, don't get me all excited about this stuff untill I can buy it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh wait...I ca n't buy one .
They do n't exist yet .
There is just the one prototype and the company that built it does n't even plan to market it.Dammit , do n't get me all excited about this stuff untill I can buy it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh wait...I can't buy one.
They don't exist yet.
There is just the one prototype and the company that built it doesn't even plan to market it.Dammit, don't get me all excited about this stuff untill I can buy it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122810</id>
	<title>Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265983140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe he meant |4z0rzzz.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe he meant | 4z0rzzz .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe he meant |4z0rzzz.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121446</id>
	<title>That would be...</title>
	<author>denzacar</author>
	<datestamp>1265976900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... one funny looking hat you'd be wearing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... one funny looking hat you 'd be wearing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... one funny looking hat you'd be wearing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118704</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120124</id>
	<title>Re:Evolution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265972100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When will it be until mosquitoes evolve energy shields?</p></div><p>More likely to develop a silver skin. There is a type of beetle with a silver chrome-like skin. I couldn't find one in a web search but I have seen them in insect collections. The real truth is mosquitoes breed in such great numbers that's their defense.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When will it be until mosquitoes evolve energy shields ? More likely to develop a silver skin .
There is a type of beetle with a silver chrome-like skin .
I could n't find one in a web search but I have seen them in insect collections .
The real truth is mosquitoes breed in such great numbers that 's their defense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When will it be until mosquitoes evolve energy shields?More likely to develop a silver skin.
There is a type of beetle with a silver chrome-like skin.
I couldn't find one in a web search but I have seen them in insect collections.
The real truth is mosquitoes breed in such great numbers that's their defense.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119802</id>
	<title>Re:PETA ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265971140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Don't you mean a high pitched hissy fit.</p></div><p>PETA males do tend to hissy at a higher frequency than PETA females in addition to being more slender and far less hirsute than PETA females.  Scientists are still struggling to understand why this is so, but the leading theory posits that PETA males are nancy boys.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't you mean a high pitched hissy fit.PETA males do tend to hissy at a higher frequency than PETA females in addition to being more slender and far less hirsute than PETA females .
Scientists are still struggling to understand why this is so , but the leading theory posits that PETA males are nancy boys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't you mean a high pitched hissy fit.PETA males do tend to hissy at a higher frequency than PETA females in addition to being more slender and far less hirsute than PETA females.
Scientists are still struggling to understand why this is so, but the leading theory posits that PETA males are nancy boys.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31124982</id>
	<title>Re:Darwin says...</title>
	<author>Vellmont</author>
	<datestamp>1266003660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i><br>Darwin says, in a generation or two, the frequency changes.<br></i><br>Right, just like people have evolved to be bulletproof, and bacteria have evolved to survive heat sterilization.</p><p>Evolution doesn't mean everything eventually adapts.  It only means the strongest survive.  Change isn't costless either.  Greater change requires more "cost".  It may very well be the case that frequency changes are far too difficult of a change to come about.  Who knows?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Darwin says , in a generation or two , the frequency changes.Right , just like people have evolved to be bulletproof , and bacteria have evolved to survive heat sterilization.Evolution does n't mean everything eventually adapts .
It only means the strongest survive .
Change is n't costless either .
Greater change requires more " cost " .
It may very well be the case that frequency changes are far too difficult of a change to come about .
Who knows ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Darwin says, in a generation or two, the frequency changes.Right, just like people have evolved to be bulletproof, and bacteria have evolved to survive heat sterilization.Evolution doesn't mean everything eventually adapts.
It only means the strongest survive.
Change isn't costless either.
Greater change requires more "cost".
It may very well be the case that frequency changes are far too difficult of a change to come about.
Who knows?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120614</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120668</id>
	<title>Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265973840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Itz ztimulated emizzion, learn ye quantum mechanicz.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Itz ztimulated emizzion , learn ye quantum mechanicz .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Itz ztimulated emizzion, learn ye quantum mechanicz.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120134</id>
	<title>Re:Combating Malaria</title>
	<author>secondhand\_Buddah</author>
	<datestamp>1265972220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Recent studies in rural South Africa where DDT is still used extensively has shown a  significant statistical increase in transgendererd humans.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Recent studies in rural South Africa where DDT is still used extensively has shown a significant statistical increase in transgendererd humans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Recent studies in rural South Africa where DDT is still used extensively has shown a  significant statistical increase in transgendererd humans.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118792</id>
	<title>Safety of the device?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265968500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While I admit this is very cool and I'll take two; what power is the laser?  What keeps this thing from also shooting out a user's eyes while it is doing its job?</htmltext>
<tokenext>While I admit this is very cool and I 'll take two ; what power is the laser ?
What keeps this thing from also shooting out a user 's eyes while it is doing its job ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I admit this is very cool and I'll take two; what power is the laser?
What keeps this thing from also shooting out a user's eyes while it is doing its job?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118738</id>
	<title>It's friendly</title>
	<author>hitchhacker</author>
	<datestamp>1265968440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a friendly mosquito killing robot here to help you... Until a mosquito lands on your face or near your eyes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a friendly mosquito killing robot here to help you... Until a mosquito lands on your face or near your eyes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a friendly mosquito killing robot here to help you... Until a mosquito lands on your face or near your eyes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118802</id>
	<title>Want!!</title>
	<author>Scutter</author>
	<datestamp>1265968560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a walking mosquito magnet, let me be the first to say "I'm in.  Let's do this thing."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a walking mosquito magnet , let me be the first to say " I 'm in .
Let 's do this thing .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a walking mosquito magnet, let me be the first to say "I'm in.
Let's do this thing.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31142190</id>
	<title>Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>jc79</author>
	<datestamp>1266230400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This lazer device<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...  the lazer<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... lazer,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.....</p></div><p>Aaargh!<br>
<br>
It's a la<b>s</b>er.<br>
<br>Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation<br>
<br>
LA<b>S</b>ER<br>
<br>
Stimulated is not spelt Ztimulated.<br>
&lt;/rant&gt;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This lazer device ... the lazer ... lazer , .....Aaargh !
It 's a laser .
Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation LASER Stimulated is not spelt Ztimulated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This lazer device ...  the lazer ... lazer, .....Aaargh!
It's a laser.
Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation

LASER

Stimulated is not spelt Ztimulated.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31141916</id>
	<title>We will all pay for this...</title>
	<author>Mats Svensson</author>
	<datestamp>1266226560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... when the space mosquitoes comes, and wants to know what happened to their primitive cousins.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... when the space mosquitoes comes , and wants to know what happened to their primitive cousins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... when the space mosquitoes comes, and wants to know what happened to their primitive cousins.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119560</id>
	<title>Are mosquitos a type of missle?</title>
	<author>MobyDisk</author>
	<datestamp>1265970480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I saw the headline, I thought it was a dupe of <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/02/12/1350222/Directed-Energy-Weapon-Downs-Ballistic-Missile?from=rss&amp;utm\_source=feedburner&amp;utm\_medium=feed&amp;utm\_campaign=Feed\%3A+Slashdot\%2Fslashdotatom+(Slashdot(Atom))" title="slashdot.org">the earlier article about Directed Energy Weapons</a> [slashdot.org] but that Mosquito was the name of the type of missile.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I saw the headline , I thought it was a dupe of the earlier article about Directed Energy Weapons [ slashdot.org ] but that Mosquito was the name of the type of missile .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I saw the headline, I thought it was a dupe of the earlier article about Directed Energy Weapons [slashdot.org] but that Mosquito was the name of the type of missile.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119088</id>
	<title>Weemz</title>
	<author>Weemz</author>
	<datestamp>1265969280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is awesome. I need to mount one of these on the handle bars of my mountain bike and wire up a firing trigger with the handle. lol</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is awesome .
I need to mount one of these on the handle bars of my mountain bike and wire up a firing trigger with the handle .
lol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is awesome.
I need to mount one of these on the handle bars of my mountain bike and wire up a firing trigger with the handle.
lol</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118644</id>
	<title>David Brin, "Earth"</title>
	<author>gnasher719</author>
	<datestamp>1265968200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's where the idea comes from<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's where the idea comes from : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's where the idea comes from :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121904</id>
	<title>Fly Wars spoof video</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265978940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ki4JKy4XkC4" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow"> <b>Fly Wars</b> </a> [youtube.com] is a decades-old hilarious (and prescient) spoof about this technology.</p><p>Thanks to someone with a good memory<br>who <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/12/using-lasers-to-zap-mosquitoes/?hp#comment2" title="nytimes.com" rel="nofollow">posted</a> [nytimes.com] this to the NY Times article.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fly Wars [ youtube.com ] is a decades-old hilarious ( and prescient ) spoof about this technology.Thanks to someone with a good memorywho posted [ nytimes.com ] this to the NY Times article .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Fly Wars  [youtube.com] is a decades-old hilarious (and prescient) spoof about this technology.Thanks to someone with a good memorywho posted [nytimes.com] this to the NY Times article.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125424</id>
	<title>Re:Pardon my skepticism</title>
	<author>OrangeCatholic</author>
	<datestamp>1266055140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt;Forgive me if I'm skeptical.
<br> <br>
No kidding.  In this video, a kid burns a mosquito with a blu-ray laser.  The damn thing runs around for 20 seconds before it finally starts to die.
<br> <br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiShG2OxWVc" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiShG2OxWVc</a> [youtube.com]
<br> <br>
How come the inventors of this device don't have a video?</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Forgive me if I 'm skeptical .
No kidding .
In this video , a kid burns a mosquito with a blu-ray laser .
The damn thing runs around for 20 seconds before it finally starts to die .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = LiShG2OxWVc [ youtube.com ] How come the inventors of this device do n't have a video ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;Forgive me if I'm skeptical.
No kidding.
In this video, a kid burns a mosquito with a blu-ray laser.
The damn thing runs around for 20 seconds before it finally starts to die.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiShG2OxWVc [youtube.com]
 
How come the inventors of this device don't have a video?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125150</id>
	<title>Re:A product of Intellectual Ventures</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1266092820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps. I Iooked at the video and TFA and have yet to see the device in operation. I see the close ups of mosquitoes being zapped, but no device in sight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps .
I Iooked at the video and TFA and have yet to see the device in operation .
I see the close ups of mosquitoes being zapped , but no device in sight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps.
I Iooked at the video and TFA and have yet to see the device in operation.
I see the close ups of mosquitoes being zapped, but no device in sight.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31123648</id>
	<title>Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>m000</author>
	<datestamp>1265989380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But there is in <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leaDaaux5lg" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Lazer Ghosts 2: Return to Laser Cove</a> [youtube.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>But there is in Lazer Ghosts 2 : Return to Laser Cove [ youtube.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But there is in Lazer Ghosts 2: Return to Laser Cove [youtube.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121558</id>
	<title>Re:Old 1980's Technology, with One Problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265977440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Light Amplification by Ztimulated Emision of Radiation?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Light Amplification by Ztimulated Emision of Radiation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Light Amplification by Ztimulated Emision of Radiation?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31123884</id>
	<title>Re:An improvement suggestion</title>
	<author>mi</author>
	<datestamp>1265991480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Of course, you would have just doubled the rate of failure as well by doubling the number of components you're dependent on by not providing redundancy.</p></div></blockquote><p>Against mosquitoes redundancy is, uhm, redundant. But if you must, you can offer an XL-model with, say, 3 lasers such that any two of them together can kill the bug, but any one of them is harmless.

</p><p>For military application I do talk about redundancy quite a bit &mdash; I'm proposing not two, but a large (variable) number of geographically dispersed small lasers. Small enough to be cheap, easy to operate (no dangerously charged batteries, for example) and not dangerous by themselves (you'll even be able to afford for some of them to fall into enemy's hands on occasion).

</p><p>Let's say, X units of something is required to destroy a target. If you have 50 lasers each producing 1/25th of X, you can afford to lose 50\% of them and still be able to do the job. Better yet, as long as you have all 50 operational (or, say, 55), you can kill 2 targets at a time. Different targets may need more or fewer lasers &mdash; having many lasers you'll have the flexibility. They can be added to the system at any point, as well as remove for maintenance. You'll be able to perform partial upgrades to your setup. All the while, the enemy will be unable to eliminate the whole system by a single successful attack (such as with a suicide bomber, for example).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , you would have just doubled the rate of failure as well by doubling the number of components you 're dependent on by not providing redundancy.Against mosquitoes redundancy is , uhm , redundant .
But if you must , you can offer an XL-model with , say , 3 lasers such that any two of them together can kill the bug , but any one of them is harmless .
For military application I do talk about redundancy quite a bit    I 'm proposing not two , but a large ( variable ) number of geographically dispersed small lasers .
Small enough to be cheap , easy to operate ( no dangerously charged batteries , for example ) and not dangerous by themselves ( you 'll even be able to afford for some of them to fall into enemy 's hands on occasion ) .
Let 's say , X units of something is required to destroy a target .
If you have 50 lasers each producing 1/25th of X , you can afford to lose 50 \ % of them and still be able to do the job .
Better yet , as long as you have all 50 operational ( or , say , 55 ) , you can kill 2 targets at a time .
Different targets may need more or fewer lasers    having many lasers you 'll have the flexibility .
They can be added to the system at any point , as well as remove for maintenance .
You 'll be able to perform partial upgrades to your setup .
All the while , the enemy will be unable to eliminate the whole system by a single successful attack ( such as with a suicide bomber , for example ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, you would have just doubled the rate of failure as well by doubling the number of components you're dependent on by not providing redundancy.Against mosquitoes redundancy is, uhm, redundant.
But if you must, you can offer an XL-model with, say, 3 lasers such that any two of them together can kill the bug, but any one of them is harmless.
For military application I do talk about redundancy quite a bit — I'm proposing not two, but a large (variable) number of geographically dispersed small lasers.
Small enough to be cheap, easy to operate (no dangerously charged batteries, for example) and not dangerous by themselves (you'll even be able to afford for some of them to fall into enemy's hands on occasion).
Let's say, X units of something is required to destroy a target.
If you have 50 lasers each producing 1/25th of X, you can afford to lose 50\% of them and still be able to do the job.
Better yet, as long as you have all 50 operational (or, say, 55), you can kill 2 targets at a time.
Different targets may need more or fewer lasers — having many lasers you'll have the flexibility.
They can be added to the system at any point, as well as remove for maintenance.
You'll be able to perform partial upgrades to your setup.
All the while, the enemy will be unable to eliminate the whole system by a single successful attack (such as with a suicide bomber, for example).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31124342</id>
	<title>how long</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265995980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>til the developers nerf it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>til the developers nerf it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>til the developers nerf it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125448</id>
	<title>Re:An improvement suggestion</title>
	<author>OrangeCatholic</author>
	<datestamp>1266055980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt;An improvement in both safety and efficiency would be to use two lasers, each about 60\% as strong as the currently used single one.
<br> <br>
This is why the internet is ruining our country.  It used to be you had to put on a tuxedo and hold a martini glass to hear this kind of garbage.  Now it's everywhere.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; An improvement in both safety and efficiency would be to use two lasers , each about 60 \ % as strong as the currently used single one .
This is why the internet is ruining our country .
It used to be you had to put on a tuxedo and hold a martini glass to hear this kind of garbage .
Now it 's everywhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;An improvement in both safety and efficiency would be to use two lasers, each about 60\% as strong as the currently used single one.
This is why the internet is ruining our country.
It used to be you had to put on a tuxedo and hold a martini glass to hear this kind of garbage.
Now it's everywhere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118572</id>
	<title>PETA ...</title>
	<author>A nonymous Coward</author>
	<datestamp>1265968020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... is going to throw a fit.  A pissy hissy little fit.  Good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... is going to throw a fit .
A pissy hissy little fit .
Good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... is going to throw a fit.
A pissy hissy little fit.
Good.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125434</id>
	<title>If You Actually Read The Fucking Article</title>
	<author>OrangeCatholic</author>
	<datestamp>1266055740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123680870885500701.html" title="wsj.com" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123680870885500701.html</a> [wsj.com]
<br> <br>
They don't have a lethal system.
<br> <br>
They have a targeting system that works on highly-illuminated mosquitos <i>in a box</i> <b>in front of a reflective screen</b>.  The optics track the shadows.  You wouldn't be able to sleep in a room with this device because it would have ONE REALLY POWERFUL lightbulb.  And very bright walls.
<br> <br>
Also, there's nothing in the article about differentiating males from females.  Except they say they can.  I would assume by size, but they don't actually say, nor do they claim that it works, or that they even have a device or a method for doing so.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //online.wsj.com/article/SB123680870885500701.html [ wsj.com ] They do n't have a lethal system .
They have a targeting system that works on highly-illuminated mosquitos in a box in front of a reflective screen .
The optics track the shadows .
You would n't be able to sleep in a room with this device because it would have ONE REALLY POWERFUL lightbulb .
And very bright walls .
Also , there 's nothing in the article about differentiating males from females .
Except they say they can .
I would assume by size , but they do n't actually say , nor do they claim that it works , or that they even have a device or a method for doing so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123680870885500701.html [wsj.com]
 
They don't have a lethal system.
They have a targeting system that works on highly-illuminated mosquitos in a box in front of a reflective screen.
The optics track the shadows.
You wouldn't be able to sleep in a room with this device because it would have ONE REALLY POWERFUL lightbulb.
And very bright walls.
Also, there's nothing in the article about differentiating males from females.
Except they say they can.
I would assume by size, but they don't actually say, nor do they claim that it works, or that they even have a device or a method for doing so.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31124854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31127098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31123648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119160
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118876
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118694
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125330
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31124434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31130466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120304
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118874
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31128980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122828
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31142190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120274
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120858
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31145438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120844
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31124122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31124982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31123920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120132
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121072
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119154
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31181700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118914
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119776
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121340
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121446
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120604
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31123884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31150308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_12_176220_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121162
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122472
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119278
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119508
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120274
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118874
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118594
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119420
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119114
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119104
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121530
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119776
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118736
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120068
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118802
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119160
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118738
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119680
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119268
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122386
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120132
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31124122
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125494
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31127098
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125150
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118818
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119782
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120230
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118630
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118640
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120358
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118422
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118670
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31128980
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118914
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119058
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119626
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121072
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118876
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118666
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121850
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120844
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119094
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119020
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31124854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119416
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118718
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121162
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120614
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31145438
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31124982
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121394
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31124434
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122938
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125382
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120944
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31181700
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31130466
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121340
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121356
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120304
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122952
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121680
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31123920
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121700
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118616
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119466
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122512
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31123884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125448
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119154
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119510
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120830
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31142190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119188
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125450
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31150308
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122810
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122482
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120604
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122608
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31123648
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31122586
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121588
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120668
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121558
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119376
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31118704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31121446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31120954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31125330
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_12_176220.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_12_176220.31119128
</commentlist>
</conversation>
