<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_11_1257246</id>
	<title>Star Wars TV Show Tainted By Memories of Jar Jar</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1265895960000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>bowman9991 writes <i>"Can George Lucas' new Star Wars TV series, the first Star Wars spin off with real actors, atone for the flawed follow-ups to his original classics? Producer Rick McCallum calls the new series 'much darker,' a 'much more character-based series' and 'more adult,' while George Lucas himself calls it more like the first Star Wars film. <a href="http://sffmedia.com/films/science-fiction-films/473-new-star-wars-tv-show-tainted-by-memories-of-jar-jar.html">The new TV show takes place in the 'dark times'</a> between the last prequel Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith and Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope, when most of the Jedi and anti-emperor politicians were hunted down and killed. The characters of Boba Fett, C-3PO, and the Emperor Palpatine will return, and casting has now begun. Mark Hamill, the actor who played Luke Skywalker from the original movies, believes George Lucas lost his way, 'making it bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger until you're just exploding with special effects all over the screen like some fireworks display,' but thinks the new show is a 'positive' step forward. Hopefully George Lucas can wipe the memory of Jar Jar Binks, Anakin and Padme's romance, his shameless merchandising, and some lame attempts at humor from everyone's minds once and for all."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>bowman9991 writes " Can George Lucas ' new Star Wars TV series , the first Star Wars spin off with real actors , atone for the flawed follow-ups to his original classics ?
Producer Rick McCallum calls the new series 'much darker, ' a 'much more character-based series ' and 'more adult, ' while George Lucas himself calls it more like the first Star Wars film .
The new TV show takes place in the 'dark times ' between the last prequel Star Wars Episode III : Revenge of the Sith and Star Wars Episode IV : A New Hope , when most of the Jedi and anti-emperor politicians were hunted down and killed .
The characters of Boba Fett , C-3PO , and the Emperor Palpatine will return , and casting has now begun .
Mark Hamill , the actor who played Luke Skywalker from the original movies , believes George Lucas lost his way , 'making it bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger until you 're just exploding with special effects all over the screen like some fireworks display, ' but thinks the new show is a 'positive ' step forward .
Hopefully George Lucas can wipe the memory of Jar Jar Binks , Anakin and Padme 's romance , his shameless merchandising , and some lame attempts at humor from everyone 's minds once and for all .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bowman9991 writes "Can George Lucas' new Star Wars TV series, the first Star Wars spin off with real actors, atone for the flawed follow-ups to his original classics?
Producer Rick McCallum calls the new series 'much darker,' a 'much more character-based series' and 'more adult,' while George Lucas himself calls it more like the first Star Wars film.
The new TV show takes place in the 'dark times' between the last prequel Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith and Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope, when most of the Jedi and anti-emperor politicians were hunted down and killed.
The characters of Boba Fett, C-3PO, and the Emperor Palpatine will return, and casting has now begun.
Mark Hamill, the actor who played Luke Skywalker from the original movies, believes George Lucas lost his way, 'making it bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger until you're just exploding with special effects all over the screen like some fireworks display,' but thinks the new show is a 'positive' step forward.
Hopefully George Lucas can wipe the memory of Jar Jar Binks, Anakin and Padme's romance, his shameless merchandising, and some lame attempts at humor from everyone's minds once and for all.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099210</id>
	<title>Re:Hey, Polyanna</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265901900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I consider myself lucky never to have watched more than 10 minutes of Star Wars. I know lots of people like Star Wars and that's fine with me, I don't mean to start any flame wars, but to me Star Wars seemed like what the past (a century before Christ) would have looked like if suddenly they stumbled upon some 1970's robot technology and learned how to use it through trial and error. My opinion of Star Wars is reflected in what I believe Star Wars should have been titled instead:<br>"Spartacus meets the Muppet rejects: the robot years"</p><p>To me anything Star Trek based (except the Scott Bakula crap) is way better than Star Wars.</p><p>I will probably get modded down by some mod in his Chewbacca costume, but I just wanted to express my opinion without insulting anyone, except for Scott Bakula, that retard has really tainted Star Trek for me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I consider myself lucky never to have watched more than 10 minutes of Star Wars .
I know lots of people like Star Wars and that 's fine with me , I do n't mean to start any flame wars , but to me Star Wars seemed like what the past ( a century before Christ ) would have looked like if suddenly they stumbled upon some 1970 's robot technology and learned how to use it through trial and error .
My opinion of Star Wars is reflected in what I believe Star Wars should have been titled instead : " Spartacus meets the Muppet rejects : the robot years " To me anything Star Trek based ( except the Scott Bakula crap ) is way better than Star Wars.I will probably get modded down by some mod in his Chewbacca costume , but I just wanted to express my opinion without insulting anyone , except for Scott Bakula , that retard has really tainted Star Trek for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I consider myself lucky never to have watched more than 10 minutes of Star Wars.
I know lots of people like Star Wars and that's fine with me, I don't mean to start any flame wars, but to me Star Wars seemed like what the past (a century before Christ) would have looked like if suddenly they stumbled upon some 1970's robot technology and learned how to use it through trial and error.
My opinion of Star Wars is reflected in what I believe Star Wars should have been titled instead:"Spartacus meets the Muppet rejects: the robot years"To me anything Star Trek based (except the Scott Bakula crap) is way better than Star Wars.I will probably get modded down by some mod in his Chewbacca costume, but I just wanted to express my opinion without insulting anyone, except for Scott Bakula, that retard has really tainted Star Trek for me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099042</id>
	<title>Re:Never mind prequels</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265900880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, but that involved the Emperor surviving VI, only to be defeated in IX by Han and Leia's offspring. Can't be done now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but that involved the Emperor surviving VI , only to be defeated in IX by Han and Leia 's offspring .
Ca n't be done now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but that involved the Emperor surviving VI, only to be defeated in IX by Han and Leia's offspring.
Can't be done now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100866</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>cgenman</author>
	<datestamp>1265909880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Young Indiana Jones was actually pretty good.  I have fond memories of that show, and feel it didn't get the run that it deserved.  And television is a far dirtier process that should allow other people's creativities to flow into what goes on-screen.  Maybe that will make up for Lucas's atrocious dialog.  Let's hope the actors can ad-lib.</p><p>That having been said, wanting a 400 run show is just asinine.  Planning for 2 or 3 parallel spinoffs 3 years down the line is the kind of bloated, dillute thinking that put all the good parts of Episode 1 - 3 right at the end.  They need to make the first season worth watching, and coming up with enough compelling material for 15 hours is incredibly difficult.  That's what they should be focusing on, not taking good bits here and there and saving them for the sequels.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Young Indiana Jones was actually pretty good .
I have fond memories of that show , and feel it did n't get the run that it deserved .
And television is a far dirtier process that should allow other people 's creativities to flow into what goes on-screen .
Maybe that will make up for Lucas 's atrocious dialog .
Let 's hope the actors can ad-lib.That having been said , wanting a 400 run show is just asinine .
Planning for 2 or 3 parallel spinoffs 3 years down the line is the kind of bloated , dillute thinking that put all the good parts of Episode 1 - 3 right at the end .
They need to make the first season worth watching , and coming up with enough compelling material for 15 hours is incredibly difficult .
That 's what they should be focusing on , not taking good bits here and there and saving them for the sequels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Young Indiana Jones was actually pretty good.
I have fond memories of that show, and feel it didn't get the run that it deserved.
And television is a far dirtier process that should allow other people's creativities to flow into what goes on-screen.
Maybe that will make up for Lucas's atrocious dialog.
Let's hope the actors can ad-lib.That having been said, wanting a 400 run show is just asinine.
Planning for 2 or 3 parallel spinoffs 3 years down the line is the kind of bloated, dillute thinking that put all the good parts of Episode 1 - 3 right at the end.
They need to make the first season worth watching, and coming up with enough compelling material for 15 hours is incredibly difficult.
That's what they should be focusing on, not taking good bits here and there and saving them for the sequels.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31107808</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265894820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd suggest having the series centered around a small group of people that are trying to start the rebellion, trying to out senator palpatine as evil, sabotage imperial plans/bases, find out about the secret weapon the empire is building, help the remaining jedi that are being hunted by Vader all while being chased relentlessly by the empire and trying to get people to join them in their fight.</p><p>Plenty of ground there to make a decent show, but very much doubt they will manage.  Can they instead just give it to HBO to make it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd suggest having the series centered around a small group of people that are trying to start the rebellion , trying to out senator palpatine as evil , sabotage imperial plans/bases , find out about the secret weapon the empire is building , help the remaining jedi that are being hunted by Vader all while being chased relentlessly by the empire and trying to get people to join them in their fight.Plenty of ground there to make a decent show , but very much doubt they will manage .
Can they instead just give it to HBO to make it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd suggest having the series centered around a small group of people that are trying to start the rebellion, trying to out senator palpatine as evil, sabotage imperial plans/bases, find out about the secret weapon the empire is building, help the remaining jedi that are being hunted by Vader all while being chased relentlessly by the empire and trying to get people to join them in their fight.Plenty of ground there to make a decent show, but very much doubt they will manage.
Can they instead just give it to HBO to make it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31113702</id>
	<title>Re:Hey, Polyanna</title>
	<author>Provocateur</author>
	<datestamp>1265993340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>[waveshand]This isn't the reboot you're looking for. Move along.[/waveshand]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>[ waveshand ] This is n't the reboot you 're looking for .
Move along .
[ /waveshand ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[waveshand]This isn't the reboot you're looking for.
Move along.
[/waveshand]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31102702</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1265917800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He's not Luke Skywalker to me anymore.  He's now the Joker.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's not Luke Skywalker to me anymore .
He 's now the Joker .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's not Luke Skywalker to me anymore.
He's now the Joker.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31104506</id>
	<title>Re:Never mind prequels</title>
	<author>pjtp</author>
	<datestamp>1265881380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In the post Star Was novels it was revealed that Palpatine had clones of himself. His 'essence' fled Endor and moved into a clone.</p></div><p>I have a real problem with that, and I hope that it never finds its way into canon.</p><p>It completely devalues the sacrifice Vader/Anakin makes in saving his son.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the post Star Was novels it was revealed that Palpatine had clones of himself .
His 'essence ' fled Endor and moved into a clone.I have a real problem with that , and I hope that it never finds its way into canon.It completely devalues the sacrifice Vader/Anakin makes in saving his son .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the post Star Was novels it was revealed that Palpatine had clones of himself.
His 'essence' fled Endor and moved into a clone.I have a real problem with that, and I hope that it never finds its way into canon.It completely devalues the sacrifice Vader/Anakin makes in saving his son.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100804</id>
	<title>Jar Jar one of the better things about SW1-3</title>
	<author>Maxo-Texas</author>
	<datestamp>1265909460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good things<br>Jar jar creating character conflict as occurred in the first three films (eg. irritated the other wise cipher like Gui kan (sp) "NO!".<br>Palpatine (well written and well acted)</p><p>bad things</p><p>mitochlorians<br>jedi fighting for hours without any talking at all against pretty backdrops.<br>running out of time to do a decent corruption of Anakin and having him improbably able to kill helpless small children way too soon to make sense.<br>assuming a child killer *could* be the ultimate hero of the series (sorry, but it changes the darth vader of the original 3 considerably).<br>Utter lack of character conflict (except Jar Jar).<br>Too many "just so" scenes to list.<br>Some of the worst acting I've ever seen from a lot of really fine actors (which tells you the problem was Lucas, not the actors).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good thingsJar jar creating character conflict as occurred in the first three films ( eg .
irritated the other wise cipher like Gui kan ( sp ) " NO !
" .Palpatine ( well written and well acted ) bad thingsmitochloriansjedi fighting for hours without any talking at all against pretty backdrops.running out of time to do a decent corruption of Anakin and having him improbably able to kill helpless small children way too soon to make sense.assuming a child killer * could * be the ultimate hero of the series ( sorry , but it changes the darth vader of the original 3 considerably ) .Utter lack of character conflict ( except Jar Jar ) .Too many " just so " scenes to list.Some of the worst acting I 've ever seen from a lot of really fine actors ( which tells you the problem was Lucas , not the actors ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good thingsJar jar creating character conflict as occurred in the first three films (eg.
irritated the other wise cipher like Gui kan (sp) "NO!
".Palpatine (well written and well acted)bad thingsmitochloriansjedi fighting for hours without any talking at all against pretty backdrops.running out of time to do a decent corruption of Anakin and having him improbably able to kill helpless small children way too soon to make sense.assuming a child killer *could* be the ultimate hero of the series (sorry, but it changes the darth vader of the original 3 considerably).Utter lack of character conflict (except Jar Jar).Too many "just so" scenes to list.Some of the worst acting I've ever seen from a lot of really fine actors (which tells you the problem was Lucas, not the actors).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099320</id>
	<title>meh</title>
	<author>rarel</author>
	<datestamp>1265902440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll be waiting for <i>CSI: Coruscant</i> <p>


"We found him in the Academy sewers and the burns on the decapitated corpse indicate lightsaber cuts, which means the killer is probably... *beat* It's not a Jedi that I'm looking for. Please move along. Move along!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll be waiting for CSI : Coruscant " We found him in the Academy sewers and the burns on the decapitated corpse indicate lightsaber cuts , which means the killer is probably... * beat * It 's not a Jedi that I 'm looking for .
Please move along .
Move along !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll be waiting for CSI: Coruscant 


"We found him in the Academy sewers and the burns on the decapitated corpse indicate lightsaber cuts, which means the killer is probably... *beat* It's not a Jedi that I'm looking for.
Please move along.
Move along!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100412</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1265907600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Things don't go back to how they were, that's the point.  It's a transitional period, where the Rebel Alliance is forming, the remaining Jedi are being hunted down and exterminated and the Empire is consolidating.  There is lots of scope for episodes that change major things.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Things do n't go back to how they were , that 's the point .
It 's a transitional period , where the Rebel Alliance is forming , the remaining Jedi are being hunted down and exterminated and the Empire is consolidating .
There is lots of scope for episodes that change major things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Things don't go back to how they were, that's the point.
It's a transitional period, where the Rebel Alliance is forming, the remaining Jedi are being hunted down and exterminated and the Empire is consolidating.
There is lots of scope for episodes that change major things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099514</id>
	<title>Spaceballs</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1265903580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>LONE STARR: But, Yogurt, what is this place? What is that you do here?</p><p>YOGURT: Merchandising.</p><p>BARF: Merchandising? What's that?</p><p>YOGURT: Merchandising. Come. I'll show. Open up this door. Ha, ha, ha, come. Walk this way. Take a look. We put the pictures name on everything. Merchandising. Merchandising. Where the real money from the movie is made. Spaceballs - the T-shirt, Spaceballs - the Coloring Book, Spaceballs - the Lunch box, Spaceballs - the Breakfast Cereal, Spaceballs - the Flame Thrower.</p><p>DINKS: Ooooooo.</p><p>YOGURT: The kids love this one. Last, but not least, Spaceballs - the Doll. Me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>LONE STARR : But , Yogurt , what is this place ?
What is that you do here ? YOGURT : Merchandising.BARF : Merchandising ?
What 's that ? YOGURT : Merchandising .
Come. I 'll show .
Open up this door .
Ha , ha , ha , come .
Walk this way .
Take a look .
We put the pictures name on everything .
Merchandising. Merchandising .
Where the real money from the movie is made .
Spaceballs - the T-shirt , Spaceballs - the Coloring Book , Spaceballs - the Lunch box , Spaceballs - the Breakfast Cereal , Spaceballs - the Flame Thrower.DINKS : Ooooooo.YOGURT : The kids love this one .
Last , but not least , Spaceballs - the Doll .
Me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LONE STARR: But, Yogurt, what is this place?
What is that you do here?YOGURT: Merchandising.BARF: Merchandising?
What's that?YOGURT: Merchandising.
Come. I'll show.
Open up this door.
Ha, ha, ha, come.
Walk this way.
Take a look.
We put the pictures name on everything.
Merchandising. Merchandising.
Where the real money from the movie is made.
Spaceballs - the T-shirt, Spaceballs - the Coloring Book, Spaceballs - the Lunch box, Spaceballs - the Breakfast Cereal, Spaceballs - the Flame Thrower.DINKS: Ooooooo.YOGURT: The kids love this one.
Last, but not least, Spaceballs - the Doll.
Me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099842</id>
	<title>It's what the Star Wars fans want</title>
	<author>erroneus</author>
	<datestamp>1265905140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We want some drama and action.  It's a simple formula really.  We don't need "comic relief" and especially not in a TV series.</p><p>But there is another thing wrong with the prequels and this series as well.  Unless nearly all characters are completely new, we know who will live and who will die -- it's worse than the guys named "smith and jones" wearing red shirts on Star Trek.  We KNOW the characters will live and in what state they will be in by the time Episode 4 comes around.  (I think the family guy star wars spoof said it plainly and accurately when it was said "we have most of the major characters in this story on this ship.  I'm pretty sure we'll all make it through just fine" or something like that.)  Not knowing what will happen next is an important factor in a good story.</p><p>Will Darth Vader die?  Nope!  Will he turn away from the dark side?  Nope!  (Might be tempted here and there I presume.)  Will he remember that he built C3PO?</p><p>Now here's a question -- will characters from "The Force Unleashed" be in this series???  Will there be aspects of X-Wing vs. Tie Fighter and related games in this series?  I seriously hope so -- those were great games with great stories.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We want some drama and action .
It 's a simple formula really .
We do n't need " comic relief " and especially not in a TV series.But there is another thing wrong with the prequels and this series as well .
Unless nearly all characters are completely new , we know who will live and who will die -- it 's worse than the guys named " smith and jones " wearing red shirts on Star Trek .
We KNOW the characters will live and in what state they will be in by the time Episode 4 comes around .
( I think the family guy star wars spoof said it plainly and accurately when it was said " we have most of the major characters in this story on this ship .
I 'm pretty sure we 'll all make it through just fine " or something like that .
) Not knowing what will happen next is an important factor in a good story.Will Darth Vader die ?
Nope ! Will he turn away from the dark side ?
Nope ! ( Might be tempted here and there I presume .
) Will he remember that he built C3PO ? Now here 's a question -- will characters from " The Force Unleashed " be in this series ? ? ?
Will there be aspects of X-Wing vs. Tie Fighter and related games in this series ?
I seriously hope so -- those were great games with great stories .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We want some drama and action.
It's a simple formula really.
We don't need "comic relief" and especially not in a TV series.But there is another thing wrong with the prequels and this series as well.
Unless nearly all characters are completely new, we know who will live and who will die -- it's worse than the guys named "smith and jones" wearing red shirts on Star Trek.
We KNOW the characters will live and in what state they will be in by the time Episode 4 comes around.
(I think the family guy star wars spoof said it plainly and accurately when it was said "we have most of the major characters in this story on this ship.
I'm pretty sure we'll all make it through just fine" or something like that.
)  Not knowing what will happen next is an important factor in a good story.Will Darth Vader die?
Nope!  Will he turn away from the dark side?
Nope!  (Might be tempted here and there I presume.
)  Will he remember that he built C3PO?Now here's a question -- will characters from "The Force Unleashed" be in this series???
Will there be aspects of X-Wing vs. Tie Fighter and related games in this series?
I seriously hope so -- those were great games with great stories.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31110816</id>
	<title>Re:It's far too late...</title>
	<author>DeadS0ul</author>
	<datestamp>1265970960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>you're one of the people that should watch the 70 minute the phantom menace review.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxKtZmQgxrI" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxKtZmQgxrI</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>you 're one of the people that should watch the 70 minute the phantom menace review .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = FxKtZmQgxrI [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you're one of the people that should watch the 70 minute the phantom menace review.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxKtZmQgxrI [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534</id>
	<title>It's far too late...</title>
	<author>fuzznutz</author>
	<datestamp>1265903640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was a huge fan of Star Wars until the abomination that was episode 1.  I watched episode 2 at the theater we affectionately call "The Welfare Flicks", a second run theater.  For the third, I just rented the DVD and that was just for closure.  Now, I have no more interest in Star Wars.  He f*cked up the originals, and I just don't even care anymore if he ever releases a decent DVD of the originals.
<br> <br>
As for my kids, their only interest in Star Wars is a video game with little characters made out of Legos.  They couldn't care less about the movies.  If they run any of the movies on cable, their attention span is about 15 minutes.
<br> <br>
George Lucas killed Star Wars.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was a huge fan of Star Wars until the abomination that was episode 1 .
I watched episode 2 at the theater we affectionately call " The Welfare Flicks " , a second run theater .
For the third , I just rented the DVD and that was just for closure .
Now , I have no more interest in Star Wars .
He f * cked up the originals , and I just do n't even care anymore if he ever releases a decent DVD of the originals .
As for my kids , their only interest in Star Wars is a video game with little characters made out of Legos .
They could n't care less about the movies .
If they run any of the movies on cable , their attention span is about 15 minutes .
George Lucas killed Star Wars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was a huge fan of Star Wars until the abomination that was episode 1.
I watched episode 2 at the theater we affectionately call "The Welfare Flicks", a second run theater.
For the third, I just rented the DVD and that was just for closure.
Now, I have no more interest in Star Wars.
He f*cked up the originals, and I just don't even care anymore if he ever releases a decent DVD of the originals.
As for my kids, their only interest in Star Wars is a video game with little characters made out of Legos.
They couldn't care less about the movies.
If they run any of the movies on cable, their attention span is about 15 minutes.
George Lucas killed Star Wars.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100272</id>
	<title>Re:Latter Canceled. Need New Avenues.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265907000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Keep in mind that <a href="http://entertainment.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/12/015256" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">Harrison Ford turned down a Han Solo spinoff</a> [slashdot.org] and opted instead for Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (<a href="http://www.aceshowbiz.com/news/view/00027355.html" title="aceshowbiz.com" rel="nofollow">with a fifth shaping up</a> [aceshowbiz.com]).</p></div><p>So he was offered to ruin Han Solo and instead opted for ruining Indiana Jones. This is probably the saddest story I have ever heard.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Keep in mind that Harrison Ford turned down a Han Solo spinoff [ slashdot.org ] and opted instead for Kingdom of the Crystal Skull ( with a fifth shaping up [ aceshowbiz.com ] ) .So he was offered to ruin Han Solo and instead opted for ruining Indiana Jones .
This is probably the saddest story I have ever heard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Keep in mind that Harrison Ford turned down a Han Solo spinoff [slashdot.org] and opted instead for Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (with a fifth shaping up [aceshowbiz.com]).So he was offered to ruin Han Solo and instead opted for ruining Indiana Jones.
This is probably the saddest story I have ever heard.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099558</id>
	<title>It doesn't matter</title>
	<author>roc97007</author>
	<datestamp>1265903760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Star Wars is tainted by more than the memory of Jarjar.  There's three loud, busy, but ultimately empty prequels, terrible acting by people who should know better, idiotic plot developments, a painfully pedestrian, bizarrely animated series, and years and years of disrespect towards the fans from whom he got his wealth.
</p><p>
Never again.  I don't care if the new series ignored everything made after Empire Strikes Back and was produced by Ridley Scott and directed by Martin Scorsese.  (Which it won't be; it'll be ham-fisted ol' George at the helm, as expected, and he'll make a mess of it, as expected.)  Let's all face it -- George Lucas is never going to repeat the success of 1977.  It's time to move on.  And even if by some bizarre set of circumstances he did, who cares?  I'm so through with Star Wars that I was reluctant to spend two minutes to write this.  Never again.  That ship has sailed.  Life is too short for bad TV.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Star Wars is tainted by more than the memory of Jarjar .
There 's three loud , busy , but ultimately empty prequels , terrible acting by people who should know better , idiotic plot developments , a painfully pedestrian , bizarrely animated series , and years and years of disrespect towards the fans from whom he got his wealth .
Never again .
I do n't care if the new series ignored everything made after Empire Strikes Back and was produced by Ridley Scott and directed by Martin Scorsese .
( Which it wo n't be ; it 'll be ham-fisted ol ' George at the helm , as expected , and he 'll make a mess of it , as expected .
) Let 's all face it -- George Lucas is never going to repeat the success of 1977 .
It 's time to move on .
And even if by some bizarre set of circumstances he did , who cares ?
I 'm so through with Star Wars that I was reluctant to spend two minutes to write this .
Never again .
That ship has sailed .
Life is too short for bad TV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Star Wars is tainted by more than the memory of Jarjar.
There's three loud, busy, but ultimately empty prequels, terrible acting by people who should know better, idiotic plot developments, a painfully pedestrian, bizarrely animated series, and years and years of disrespect towards the fans from whom he got his wealth.
Never again.
I don't care if the new series ignored everything made after Empire Strikes Back and was produced by Ridley Scott and directed by Martin Scorsese.
(Which it won't be; it'll be ham-fisted ol' George at the helm, as expected, and he'll make a mess of it, as expected.
)  Let's all face it -- George Lucas is never going to repeat the success of 1977.
It's time to move on.
And even if by some bizarre set of circumstances he did, who cares?
I'm so through with Star Wars that I was reluctant to spend two minutes to write this.
Never again.
That ship has sailed.
Life is too short for bad TV.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099094</id>
	<title>Latter Canceled.  Need New Avenues.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265901180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>We want sequels to Return of the Jedi. Wasn't he originally going to do 3 sets of trilogies: with the 3rd set later on, and the only common characters would be the 2 droids?</p></div><p>Yes, those were the initial plans.  Although there was a very important <i>if</i> in their plans.  From what I've heard through rumors, Lucas had two trilogies he could tell and he picked the stronger of the two (prequels) to do first.  If that was financially successful and well received <b>then</b> he would continue with the sequels.  I think this strategy changed with the release of the first or second episode and the latter sequel was canceled altogether.  <br> <br>

Keep in mind that <a href="http://entertainment.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/12/015256" title="slashdot.org">Harrison Ford turned down a Han Solo spinoff</a> [slashdot.org] and opted instead for Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (<a href="http://www.aceshowbiz.com/news/view/00027355.html" title="aceshowbiz.com">with a fifth shaping up</a> [aceshowbiz.com]).  <br> <br>

I don't want later sequels.  If anything is done in the Star Wars universe, I want the <a href="http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Timothy\_Zahn" title="wikia.com">Timothy Zahn Trilogy</a> [wikia.com] done as three movies.  Thrawn is badass.  I want a TV series that takes stories like the "Tales" series of SW books and brings them to life.  <br> <br>

Personally I think the characters in Episodes I, II and III were so weak that we need new characters that aren't supposed to fulfill some other plot line's obligations.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We want sequels to Return of the Jedi .
Was n't he originally going to do 3 sets of trilogies : with the 3rd set later on , and the only common characters would be the 2 droids ? Yes , those were the initial plans .
Although there was a very important if in their plans .
From what I 've heard through rumors , Lucas had two trilogies he could tell and he picked the stronger of the two ( prequels ) to do first .
If that was financially successful and well received then he would continue with the sequels .
I think this strategy changed with the release of the first or second episode and the latter sequel was canceled altogether .
Keep in mind that Harrison Ford turned down a Han Solo spinoff [ slashdot.org ] and opted instead for Kingdom of the Crystal Skull ( with a fifth shaping up [ aceshowbiz.com ] ) .
I do n't want later sequels .
If anything is done in the Star Wars universe , I want the Timothy Zahn Trilogy [ wikia.com ] done as three movies .
Thrawn is badass .
I want a TV series that takes stories like the " Tales " series of SW books and brings them to life .
Personally I think the characters in Episodes I , II and III were so weak that we need new characters that are n't supposed to fulfill some other plot line 's obligations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We want sequels to Return of the Jedi.
Wasn't he originally going to do 3 sets of trilogies: with the 3rd set later on, and the only common characters would be the 2 droids?Yes, those were the initial plans.
Although there was a very important if in their plans.
From what I've heard through rumors, Lucas had two trilogies he could tell and he picked the stronger of the two (prequels) to do first.
If that was financially successful and well received then he would continue with the sequels.
I think this strategy changed with the release of the first or second episode and the latter sequel was canceled altogether.
Keep in mind that Harrison Ford turned down a Han Solo spinoff [slashdot.org] and opted instead for Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (with a fifth shaping up [aceshowbiz.com]).
I don't want later sequels.
If anything is done in the Star Wars universe, I want the Timothy Zahn Trilogy [wikia.com] done as three movies.
Thrawn is badass.
I want a TV series that takes stories like the "Tales" series of SW books and brings them to life.
Personally I think the characters in Episodes I, II and III were so weak that we need new characters that aren't supposed to fulfill some other plot line's obligations.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099620</id>
	<title>Re:Never mind prequels</title>
	<author>kungfugleek</author>
	<datestamp>1265904060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He was originally going to do a movie called "The Star Wars".  He was kinda thinking of making a loosely-based series of movies in that setting, but more of the feeling of Saturday matinees when he was a kid; not really any kind of grand space opera.  I believe that the very earliest reels of Star Wars didn't even have the Episode IV subtitle.  He didn't come out with the idea of making 3 trilogies until a little while later, at which point Episode IV: A New Hope was added to the opening scroll of Star Wars.  I think this happened during the film's first theatrical release, but I'm not sure. <br>  Sorry for lack of citation -- there was a book about all this... something like "The History of Star Wars".</htmltext>
<tokenext>He was originally going to do a movie called " The Star Wars " .
He was kinda thinking of making a loosely-based series of movies in that setting , but more of the feeling of Saturday matinees when he was a kid ; not really any kind of grand space opera .
I believe that the very earliest reels of Star Wars did n't even have the Episode IV subtitle .
He did n't come out with the idea of making 3 trilogies until a little while later , at which point Episode IV : A New Hope was added to the opening scroll of Star Wars .
I think this happened during the film 's first theatrical release , but I 'm not sure .
Sorry for lack of citation -- there was a book about all this... something like " The History of Star Wars " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He was originally going to do a movie called "The Star Wars".
He was kinda thinking of making a loosely-based series of movies in that setting, but more of the feeling of Saturday matinees when he was a kid; not really any kind of grand space opera.
I believe that the very earliest reels of Star Wars didn't even have the Episode IV subtitle.
He didn't come out with the idea of making 3 trilogies until a little while later, at which point Episode IV: A New Hope was added to the opening scroll of Star Wars.
I think this happened during the film's first theatrical release, but I'm not sure.
Sorry for lack of citation -- there was a book about all this... something like "The History of Star Wars".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31107268</id>
	<title>Re:It's far too late...</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1265892120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>the original star wars movies were extremely cheesy and mark hamill, carrie fisher, et al., were terrible actors. when i watch the original movies i get chills of embarrassment for them.</i> </p><p>And yet the characters they created are a hundred times more real and more memorable than any in the prequels with vastly superior actors.  Natalie Portman could act circles around Carrie Fisher*, yet Princess Leia is dynamic, interesting, and memorable while Princess Amidala was as flat and boring as possible.  Portman could do nothing to make her interesting, because there was nothing interesting about her.  Leia had personality, Padme had none.</p><p>Characters is the number one reason why the original trilogy is good, and the prequels are crap.</p><p> <i>as for the story<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... let's see. a moon-size space station that is destroyed from a tiny fighter with a single shot<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... i can go on.</i> </p><p>Yeah because it had the stereotypical reactor that would explode like a gigantic bomb at the tiniest hit.  And?  You're complaining because the plot included something that was <i>physically</i> improbable?  You forgot to mention that the fighter pilot used magic to make the shot!</p><p>That's not what makes a plot good or bad.  A plot is good if it's reasonable and engaging.  The story of Star Wars was simple, but it progressed in a straightforward and logical way and at an engaging pace.  The Rebels try to steal plans to the Empire's super weapon, but are captured, so the droids get sent to find someone who can help rescue the Princess and get the plans to the Rebels.  They succeed, but the Empire tracks them back to their hidden base so they have to attack and destroy the Death Star before it can destroy them.</p><p>Clear motivations on the parts of all characters, logical actions, logical conclusions.</p><p>I'm not even going to try to summarize TPM.  I would get about two words in and start having to talk about trade routes and treaties that never made any sense and never really mattered anyway even though it defines what's at stake and why.  Characters, especially villains, act against their own interests, even their "secret" ones and it only comes together because it has to.</p><p> <i>the real difference between episodes 4-6 and 1-3 is *you*, not the films. </i> </p><p>Nonsense.  I'm perfectly capable of seeing when something I liked as a kid is really crap, and there's plenty of kids movies that I first saw as an adult that I love.  Nostalgia made me want to watch <i>Transformers: The Movie</i> again.  Nostalgia couldn't hide the fact that after the first five minutes (when they've finished clearing the slate for a new batch of toys) that movie is painful to watch.</p><p> <i>when you are a child, you don't tend to get caught up in bad acting and less than stellar plots. your mind is flexible enough to fill in the blanks, skip inconsistencies, and expand on ideas.  now that you are an adult, you want the whole thing laid in front of you perfectly</i> </p><p>I'm a lot better at filling in the blanks and expanding on ideas now, actually.  I quite enjoy mentally filling in back story for things that aren't explained in the movies.  But in reality it's the prequels that laid everything out in front of you "perfectly", and by "perfectly" I mean in agonizing, complicated, nonsensical and yet ultimately irrelevant detail.  I guarantee you there aren't any children out there who even followed the plot of Phantom Menace, much less "expanded on ideas".  They probably did "skip inconsistencies", as in the everything having to do with trade and treaties and votes of no confidence and basically the whole plot itself.  A kid probably is happy just knowing that an evil droid army is attacking Naboo without really caring why.  That doesn't mean there's no difference between a plot that a kid can follow and a plot they don't care that they can't!</p><p> <i>fine if you don't like episodes 1-3, but don't pretend that 4-6 were any better.</i> </p><p>Ha!  Don't pretend they're the same!  Despite the cheese, the or</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the original star wars movies were extremely cheesy and mark hamill , carrie fisher , et al. , were terrible actors .
when i watch the original movies i get chills of embarrassment for them .
And yet the characters they created are a hundred times more real and more memorable than any in the prequels with vastly superior actors .
Natalie Portman could act circles around Carrie Fisher * , yet Princess Leia is dynamic , interesting , and memorable while Princess Amidala was as flat and boring as possible .
Portman could do nothing to make her interesting , because there was nothing interesting about her .
Leia had personality , Padme had none.Characters is the number one reason why the original trilogy is good , and the prequels are crap .
as for the story ... let 's see .
a moon-size space station that is destroyed from a tiny fighter with a single shot ... i can go on .
Yeah because it had the stereotypical reactor that would explode like a gigantic bomb at the tiniest hit .
And ? You 're complaining because the plot included something that was physically improbable ?
You forgot to mention that the fighter pilot used magic to make the shot ! That 's not what makes a plot good or bad .
A plot is good if it 's reasonable and engaging .
The story of Star Wars was simple , but it progressed in a straightforward and logical way and at an engaging pace .
The Rebels try to steal plans to the Empire 's super weapon , but are captured , so the droids get sent to find someone who can help rescue the Princess and get the plans to the Rebels .
They succeed , but the Empire tracks them back to their hidden base so they have to attack and destroy the Death Star before it can destroy them.Clear motivations on the parts of all characters , logical actions , logical conclusions.I 'm not even going to try to summarize TPM .
I would get about two words in and start having to talk about trade routes and treaties that never made any sense and never really mattered anyway even though it defines what 's at stake and why .
Characters , especially villains , act against their own interests , even their " secret " ones and it only comes together because it has to .
the real difference between episodes 4-6 and 1-3 is * you * , not the films .
Nonsense. I 'm perfectly capable of seeing when something I liked as a kid is really crap , and there 's plenty of kids movies that I first saw as an adult that I love .
Nostalgia made me want to watch Transformers : The Movie again .
Nostalgia could n't hide the fact that after the first five minutes ( when they 've finished clearing the slate for a new batch of toys ) that movie is painful to watch .
when you are a child , you do n't tend to get caught up in bad acting and less than stellar plots .
your mind is flexible enough to fill in the blanks , skip inconsistencies , and expand on ideas .
now that you are an adult , you want the whole thing laid in front of you perfectly I 'm a lot better at filling in the blanks and expanding on ideas now , actually .
I quite enjoy mentally filling in back story for things that are n't explained in the movies .
But in reality it 's the prequels that laid everything out in front of you " perfectly " , and by " perfectly " I mean in agonizing , complicated , nonsensical and yet ultimately irrelevant detail .
I guarantee you there are n't any children out there who even followed the plot of Phantom Menace , much less " expanded on ideas " .
They probably did " skip inconsistencies " , as in the everything having to do with trade and treaties and votes of no confidence and basically the whole plot itself .
A kid probably is happy just knowing that an evil droid army is attacking Naboo without really caring why .
That does n't mean there 's no difference between a plot that a kid can follow and a plot they do n't care that they ca n't !
fine if you do n't like episodes 1-3 , but do n't pretend that 4-6 were any better .
Ha ! Do n't pretend they 're the same !
Despite the cheese , the or</tokentext>
<sentencetext> the original star wars movies were extremely cheesy and mark hamill, carrie fisher, et al., were terrible actors.
when i watch the original movies i get chills of embarrassment for them.
And yet the characters they created are a hundred times more real and more memorable than any in the prequels with vastly superior actors.
Natalie Portman could act circles around Carrie Fisher*, yet Princess Leia is dynamic, interesting, and memorable while Princess Amidala was as flat and boring as possible.
Portman could do nothing to make her interesting, because there was nothing interesting about her.
Leia had personality, Padme had none.Characters is the number one reason why the original trilogy is good, and the prequels are crap.
as for the story ... let's see.
a moon-size space station that is destroyed from a tiny fighter with a single shot ... i can go on.
Yeah because it had the stereotypical reactor that would explode like a gigantic bomb at the tiniest hit.
And?  You're complaining because the plot included something that was physically improbable?
You forgot to mention that the fighter pilot used magic to make the shot!That's not what makes a plot good or bad.
A plot is good if it's reasonable and engaging.
The story of Star Wars was simple, but it progressed in a straightforward and logical way and at an engaging pace.
The Rebels try to steal plans to the Empire's super weapon, but are captured, so the droids get sent to find someone who can help rescue the Princess and get the plans to the Rebels.
They succeed, but the Empire tracks them back to their hidden base so they have to attack and destroy the Death Star before it can destroy them.Clear motivations on the parts of all characters, logical actions, logical conclusions.I'm not even going to try to summarize TPM.
I would get about two words in and start having to talk about trade routes and treaties that never made any sense and never really mattered anyway even though it defines what's at stake and why.
Characters, especially villains, act against their own interests, even their "secret" ones and it only comes together because it has to.
the real difference between episodes 4-6 and 1-3 is *you*, not the films.
Nonsense.  I'm perfectly capable of seeing when something I liked as a kid is really crap, and there's plenty of kids movies that I first saw as an adult that I love.
Nostalgia made me want to watch Transformers: The Movie again.
Nostalgia couldn't hide the fact that after the first five minutes (when they've finished clearing the slate for a new batch of toys) that movie is painful to watch.
when you are a child, you don't tend to get caught up in bad acting and less than stellar plots.
your mind is flexible enough to fill in the blanks, skip inconsistencies, and expand on ideas.
now that you are an adult, you want the whole thing laid in front of you perfectly I'm a lot better at filling in the blanks and expanding on ideas now, actually.
I quite enjoy mentally filling in back story for things that aren't explained in the movies.
But in reality it's the prequels that laid everything out in front of you "perfectly", and by "perfectly" I mean in agonizing, complicated, nonsensical and yet ultimately irrelevant detail.
I guarantee you there aren't any children out there who even followed the plot of Phantom Menace, much less "expanded on ideas".
They probably did "skip inconsistencies", as in the everything having to do with trade and treaties and votes of no confidence and basically the whole plot itself.
A kid probably is happy just knowing that an evil droid army is attacking Naboo without really caring why.
That doesn't mean there's no difference between a plot that a kid can follow and a plot they don't care that they can't!
fine if you don't like episodes 1-3, but don't pretend that 4-6 were any better.
Ha!  Don't pretend they're the same!
Despite the cheese, the or</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100904</id>
	<title>Re:It's far too late... OT</title>
	<author>cgenman</author>
	<datestamp>1265910060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry for the offtopic message, but Lego Universe is going into Beta, which your kids may enjoy.</p><p><a href="http://www.neoseeker.com/news/13104-lego-universe-beta-sign-ups-now-open/" title="neoseeker.com">http://www.neoseeker.com/news/13104-lego-universe-beta-sign-ups-now-open/</a> [neoseeker.com]</p><p>I love how a loved old property from our childhood (Star Wars) is just a pretty facade onto a loved new property from our kids' childhoods (the Lego games).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry for the offtopic message , but Lego Universe is going into Beta , which your kids may enjoy.http : //www.neoseeker.com/news/13104-lego-universe-beta-sign-ups-now-open/ [ neoseeker.com ] I love how a loved old property from our childhood ( Star Wars ) is just a pretty facade onto a loved new property from our kids ' childhoods ( the Lego games ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry for the offtopic message, but Lego Universe is going into Beta, which your kids may enjoy.http://www.neoseeker.com/news/13104-lego-universe-beta-sign-ups-now-open/ [neoseeker.com]I love how a loved old property from our childhood (Star Wars) is just a pretty facade onto a loved new property from our kids' childhoods (the Lego games).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100652</id>
	<title>Darth Aku</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1265908740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let Genndy Tartakovsky have another go. His Clone Wars show was nine levels of awesome. Set the new series in the time of The Old Republic. And because I'm a big capitalist, I'd suggest cross promoting it with Bioware's upcoming MMO.</p><p>And let Genndy bring Samurai Jack to some closure as a side project.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let Genndy Tartakovsky have another go .
His Clone Wars show was nine levels of awesome .
Set the new series in the time of The Old Republic .
And because I 'm a big capitalist , I 'd suggest cross promoting it with Bioware 's upcoming MMO.And let Genndy bring Samurai Jack to some closure as a side project .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let Genndy Tartakovsky have another go.
His Clone Wars show was nine levels of awesome.
Set the new series in the time of The Old Republic.
And because I'm a big capitalist, I'd suggest cross promoting it with Bioware's upcoming MMO.And let Genndy bring Samurai Jack to some closure as a side project.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099930</id>
	<title>Re:It's far too late...</title>
	<author>Timex</author>
	<datestamp>1265905440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When my oldest son watches the Star Wars films, he says it's "research" for his Lego Star Wars game.</p><p>We have the first three films (Episodes 4-6) and Episode 1 on DVD.  I still haven't decided if I want to bother with Episodes 2 and 3.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When my oldest son watches the Star Wars films , he says it 's " research " for his Lego Star Wars game.We have the first three films ( Episodes 4-6 ) and Episode 1 on DVD .
I still have n't decided if I want to bother with Episodes 2 and 3 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When my oldest son watches the Star Wars films, he says it's "research" for his Lego Star Wars game.We have the first three films (Episodes 4-6) and Episode 1 on DVD.
I still haven't decided if I want to bother with Episodes 2 and 3.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31105064</id>
	<title>Re:It's far too late...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265883540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I honestly believe the greatest thing 4-6 had was a guy by the name of Harrison Ford.  He made every other actor better just by being there, helping us overlook the blatant cheese.  Episodes 1-3 had no Han, no character we hated to love.<br>
<br>
They also had no consistent evil we loved to hate.  Oh Vader how I miss hating your vile evilness.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I honestly believe the greatest thing 4-6 had was a guy by the name of Harrison Ford .
He made every other actor better just by being there , helping us overlook the blatant cheese .
Episodes 1-3 had no Han , no character we hated to love .
They also had no consistent evil we loved to hate .
Oh Vader how I miss hating your vile evilness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I honestly believe the greatest thing 4-6 had was a guy by the name of Harrison Ford.
He made every other actor better just by being there, helping us overlook the blatant cheese.
Episodes 1-3 had no Han, no character we hated to love.
They also had no consistent evil we loved to hate.
Oh Vader how I miss hating your vile evilness.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100124</id>
	<title>All hail Irvin Kershner, god of light and joy!</title>
	<author>dswensen</author>
	<datestamp>1265906400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No fan will ever forget Jar-Jar, or indeed any mistake Lucas has ever made. Hating Star Wars is now an integral part of liking Star Wars. Fans will never let it go, regardless of the quality of future product. They'll continue to enthusiastically shove C-3PO cereal into their mouths, yowling "this cereal tastes so awful it raped my childhood!" until the goddamn sun goes dark.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No fan will ever forget Jar-Jar , or indeed any mistake Lucas has ever made .
Hating Star Wars is now an integral part of liking Star Wars .
Fans will never let it go , regardless of the quality of future product .
They 'll continue to enthusiastically shove C-3PO cereal into their mouths , yowling " this cereal tastes so awful it raped my childhood !
" until the goddamn sun goes dark .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No fan will ever forget Jar-Jar, or indeed any mistake Lucas has ever made.
Hating Star Wars is now an integral part of liking Star Wars.
Fans will never let it go, regardless of the quality of future product.
They'll continue to enthusiastically shove C-3PO cereal into their mouths, yowling "this cereal tastes so awful it raped my childhood!
" until the goddamn sun goes dark.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101386</id>
	<title>Re:Never mind prequels</title>
	<author>IorDMUX</author>
	<datestamp>1265912700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Episodes <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heir\_to\_the\_Empire" title="wikipedia.org">VII</a> [wikipedia.org], <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark\_Force\_Rising" title="wikipedia.org">VIII</a> [wikipedia.org], and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Last\_Command\_(novel)" title="wikipedia.org">IX</a> [wikipedia.org] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Thrawn\_Trilogy" title="wikipedia.org">have been written</a> [wikipedia.org] by Timothy Zahn.  <br> <br>Now, there are certainly a few metric craptons of post-trilogy Star Wars books out there (trust me, I read way too many of them when I was younger), and some of them are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children\_of\_the\_Jedi" title="wikipedia.org">bad</a> [wikipedia.org].  I mean <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courtship\_of\_princess\_leia" title="wikipedia.org">Really Bad</a> [wikipedia.org].  So bad that Timothy Zahn basically devoted chapters of his later <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hand\_of\_Thrawn" title="wikipedia.org">Hand of Thrawn</a> [wikipedia.org] series to "apologizing" for the other authors and trying to fix the plot holes and character messes that had been scattered over the Star Wars Universe since he single-handedly founded it in 1990<br> <br>So yeah.  Those three novels are good Star Wars reading, and most fans have been willing to accept them as the unofficial follow-up trilogy which it looks as though Lucas will never write.  Don't expect the next Dune--Zahn writes his Star Wars novels at a level only moderately more difficult than Harry Potter--but I've enjoyed the series each and every time I re-read it.<br> <br>Just to put the May 1991 publishing date of the trilogy in perspective, the Star Wars Trilogy Special Edition did not come out until 1997, with Episode 1 following in 1999.  The flood of Star Wars novels by other authors began about five years after the success of Zahn's trilogy, reaching its peak around the millennium.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Did you know that Timothy Zahn invented "Coruscant"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Episodes VII [ wikipedia.org ] , VIII [ wikipedia.org ] , and IX [ wikipedia.org ] have been written [ wikipedia.org ] by Timothy Zahn .
Now , there are certainly a few metric craptons of post-trilogy Star Wars books out there ( trust me , I read way too many of them when I was younger ) , and some of them are bad [ wikipedia.org ] .
I mean Really Bad [ wikipedia.org ] .
So bad that Timothy Zahn basically devoted chapters of his later Hand of Thrawn [ wikipedia.org ] series to " apologizing " for the other authors and trying to fix the plot holes and character messes that had been scattered over the Star Wars Universe since he single-handedly founded it in 1990 So yeah .
Those three novels are good Star Wars reading , and most fans have been willing to accept them as the unofficial follow-up trilogy which it looks as though Lucas will never write .
Do n't expect the next Dune--Zahn writes his Star Wars novels at a level only moderately more difficult than Harry Potter--but I 've enjoyed the series each and every time I re-read it .
Just to put the May 1991 publishing date of the trilogy in perspective , the Star Wars Trilogy Special Edition did not come out until 1997 , with Episode 1 following in 1999 .
The flood of Star Wars novels by other authors began about five years after the success of Zahn 's trilogy , reaching its peak around the millennium .
... Did you know that Timothy Zahn invented " Coruscant " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Episodes VII [wikipedia.org], VIII [wikipedia.org], and IX [wikipedia.org] have been written [wikipedia.org] by Timothy Zahn.
Now, there are certainly a few metric craptons of post-trilogy Star Wars books out there (trust me, I read way too many of them when I was younger), and some of them are bad [wikipedia.org].
I mean Really Bad [wikipedia.org].
So bad that Timothy Zahn basically devoted chapters of his later Hand of Thrawn [wikipedia.org] series to "apologizing" for the other authors and trying to fix the plot holes and character messes that had been scattered over the Star Wars Universe since he single-handedly founded it in 1990 So yeah.
Those three novels are good Star Wars reading, and most fans have been willing to accept them as the unofficial follow-up trilogy which it looks as though Lucas will never write.
Don't expect the next Dune--Zahn writes his Star Wars novels at a level only moderately more difficult than Harry Potter--but I've enjoyed the series each and every time I re-read it.
Just to put the May 1991 publishing date of the trilogy in perspective, the Star Wars Trilogy Special Edition did not come out until 1997, with Episode 1 following in 1999.
The flood of Star Wars novels by other authors began about five years after the success of Zahn's trilogy, reaching its peak around the millennium.
... Did you know that Timothy Zahn invented "Coruscant"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31102390</id>
	<title>Jar Jar more popular than you think.</title>
	<author>Berkyjay</author>
	<datestamp>1265916960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You do realize that Jar Jar is the most popular Star Wars character with kids right?  Us arrogant adults assumed that Lucas was making the prequels for us but he didn't.  It was made for kids of this generation and to them Jar Jar was pretty funny.  I can't even get my nephew to sit through the original trilogy.  All he ever wants to watch of Star Wars is the Phantom Menace.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do realize that Jar Jar is the most popular Star Wars character with kids right ?
Us arrogant adults assumed that Lucas was making the prequels for us but he did n't .
It was made for kids of this generation and to them Jar Jar was pretty funny .
I ca n't even get my nephew to sit through the original trilogy .
All he ever wants to watch of Star Wars is the Phantom Menace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do realize that Jar Jar is the most popular Star Wars character with kids right?
Us arrogant adults assumed that Lucas was making the prequels for us but he didn't.
It was made for kids of this generation and to them Jar Jar was pretty funny.
I can't even get my nephew to sit through the original trilogy.
All he ever wants to watch of Star Wars is the Phantom Menace.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099190</id>
	<title>Force Unleashed</title>
	<author>djnforce9</author>
	<datestamp>1265901780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know about you, but I think he should somehow include the storyline used from the game "Star Wars - The Force Unleashed". That was really well done, fits nicely between episodes III and IV, and would make a great film adaptation (or multi-part TV episode).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know about you , but I think he should somehow include the storyline used from the game " Star Wars - The Force Unleashed " .
That was really well done , fits nicely between episodes III and IV , and would make a great film adaptation ( or multi-part TV episode ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know about you, but I think he should somehow include the storyline used from the game "Star Wars - The Force Unleashed".
That was really well done, fits nicely between episodes III and IV, and would make a great film adaptation (or multi-part TV episode).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100934</id>
	<title>Re:Never mind prequels</title>
	<author>domatic</author>
	<datestamp>1265910180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only Star Wars novel I ever bothered read had "Grand Admiral Thrawn" as the heavy.  He was a Napoleon/Genghis Khan style military and political genius who had command of a large remnant of the Imperial Fleet after the events of Endor.  The most interesting subplots involved him using highly innovative military strategies to thwart the "New Republic".  Nice stuff but Lucas would never go for it when there are endless fluffy things that can be done big explosions, wooden acting, and badly realized mysticism.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only Star Wars novel I ever bothered read had " Grand Admiral Thrawn " as the heavy .
He was a Napoleon/Genghis Khan style military and political genius who had command of a large remnant of the Imperial Fleet after the events of Endor .
The most interesting subplots involved him using highly innovative military strategies to thwart the " New Republic " .
Nice stuff but Lucas would never go for it when there are endless fluffy things that can be done big explosions , wooden acting , and badly realized mysticism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only Star Wars novel I ever bothered read had "Grand Admiral Thrawn" as the heavy.
He was a Napoleon/Genghis Khan style military and political genius who had command of a large remnant of the Imperial Fleet after the events of Endor.
The most interesting subplots involved him using highly innovative military strategies to thwart the "New Republic".
Nice stuff but Lucas would never go for it when there are endless fluffy things that can be done big explosions, wooden acting, and badly realized mysticism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099882</id>
	<title>Re:Frist Post</title>
	<author>Ihmhi</author>
	<datestamp>1265905260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think right up until Enterprise Star Trek was doing a pretty decent job of keeping things fresh. Actually, hell, even with Enterprise they were doing a decent job:</p><ul><li>ToS: Five year deep-space mission</li><li>TaS: Never saw, so... I don't know, actually.</li><li>TNG: Regular old "mission of the week" Star Trek, does much to expand the universe</li><li>DS9: Changes the setting from a ship moving around to a station; first Star Trek series to have story arcs that span multiple seasons</li><li>VOY: One lone Starfleet ship in a completely unexplored sector of space</li><li>ENT: A flashback to the time before the Federation was formed</li></ul><p>There's still tons of stuff they could do and do well:</p><ul><li>A show about Section 31, the Federation's version of the CIA/Tal Shiar/Obsidian Order</li><li>A show about Starfleet Academy, think Dawson's Creek with phasers and shuttlecraft</li><li>A show about the Federation in the "Temporal Cold War" period, timeships and all</li></ul><p>Sadly, the mishandling of Enterprise really screwed the pooch for future prospects.</p><p>The one hope we had - the reboot movie - fucked things up too IMO. They had the chance to undo all of the time paradox, technobabble bullshit and actually make a coherent story. Instead, in the <em>first goddamned movie</em> we already have alternate universe shit going on. (If you can't tell, I hated all of the "Mirror Universe" episodes as well as nearly any episode or arc involving time travel with the exception of that huge-ass temporal cannon spaceship in Voyager.)</p><p>If they did Star Trek in the style of the reimagined BSG - where it doesn't have a whole buttload of technobabble, shaky physics, and continuity errors - then that show would be wildly succesful. But instead, just like comic books, we're going to be befuddled with the same messed-up continuity for decades to come.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think right up until Enterprise Star Trek was doing a pretty decent job of keeping things fresh .
Actually , hell , even with Enterprise they were doing a decent job : ToS : Five year deep-space missionTaS : Never saw , so... I do n't know , actually.TNG : Regular old " mission of the week " Star Trek , does much to expand the universeDS9 : Changes the setting from a ship moving around to a station ; first Star Trek series to have story arcs that span multiple seasonsVOY : One lone Starfleet ship in a completely unexplored sector of spaceENT : A flashback to the time before the Federation was formedThere 's still tons of stuff they could do and do well : A show about Section 31 , the Federation 's version of the CIA/Tal Shiar/Obsidian OrderA show about Starfleet Academy , think Dawson 's Creek with phasers and shuttlecraftA show about the Federation in the " Temporal Cold War " period , timeships and allSadly , the mishandling of Enterprise really screwed the pooch for future prospects.The one hope we had - the reboot movie - fucked things up too IMO .
They had the chance to undo all of the time paradox , technobabble bullshit and actually make a coherent story .
Instead , in the first goddamned movie we already have alternate universe shit going on .
( If you ca n't tell , I hated all of the " Mirror Universe " episodes as well as nearly any episode or arc involving time travel with the exception of that huge-ass temporal cannon spaceship in Voyager .
) If they did Star Trek in the style of the reimagined BSG - where it does n't have a whole buttload of technobabble , shaky physics , and continuity errors - then that show would be wildly succesful .
But instead , just like comic books , we 're going to be befuddled with the same messed-up continuity for decades to come .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think right up until Enterprise Star Trek was doing a pretty decent job of keeping things fresh.
Actually, hell, even with Enterprise they were doing a decent job:ToS: Five year deep-space missionTaS: Never saw, so... I don't know, actually.TNG: Regular old "mission of the week" Star Trek, does much to expand the universeDS9: Changes the setting from a ship moving around to a station; first Star Trek series to have story arcs that span multiple seasonsVOY: One lone Starfleet ship in a completely unexplored sector of spaceENT: A flashback to the time before the Federation was formedThere's still tons of stuff they could do and do well:A show about Section 31, the Federation's version of the CIA/Tal Shiar/Obsidian OrderA show about Starfleet Academy, think Dawson's Creek with phasers and shuttlecraftA show about the Federation in the "Temporal Cold War" period, timeships and allSadly, the mishandling of Enterprise really screwed the pooch for future prospects.The one hope we had - the reboot movie - fucked things up too IMO.
They had the chance to undo all of the time paradox, technobabble bullshit and actually make a coherent story.
Instead, in the first goddamned movie we already have alternate universe shit going on.
(If you can't tell, I hated all of the "Mirror Universe" episodes as well as nearly any episode or arc involving time travel with the exception of that huge-ass temporal cannon spaceship in Voyager.
)If they did Star Trek in the style of the reimagined BSG - where it doesn't have a whole buttload of technobabble, shaky physics, and continuity errors - then that show would be wildly succesful.
But instead, just like comic books, we're going to be befuddled with the same messed-up continuity for decades to come.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099400</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>Dachannien</author>
	<datestamp>1265902860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mark Hamill is probably just bitter because he never did get those power converters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mark Hamill is probably just bitter because he never did get those power converters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mark Hamill is probably just bitter because he never did get those power converters.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31102718</id>
	<title>Re:It's far too late...</title>
	<author>JWW</author>
	<datestamp>1265917860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree.  My kids and I like the Clone Wars cartoons a lot.  I think there is so much potential material between Ep. 2 and 3.  The big mistake Lucas made was having Anakin be so young in Episode 1.  Ep. 1 should have been scratched and the prequels should have started with 2 and made a real War Movie (ala the clone wars series) in between 2 and 3.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
My kids and I like the Clone Wars cartoons a lot .
I think there is so much potential material between Ep .
2 and 3 .
The big mistake Lucas made was having Anakin be so young in Episode 1 .
Ep. 1 should have been scratched and the prequels should have started with 2 and made a real War Movie ( ala the clone wars series ) in between 2 and 3 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
My kids and I like the Clone Wars cartoons a lot.
I think there is so much potential material between Ep.
2 and 3.
The big mistake Lucas made was having Anakin be so young in Episode 1.
Ep. 1 should have been scratched and the prequels should have started with 2 and made a real War Movie (ala the clone wars series) in between 2 and 3.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098820</id>
	<title>Humm</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1265899860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Hopefully George Lucas can wipe the memory of Jar Jar Binks, Anakin and Padme's romance, his shameless merchandising, and some lame attempts at humor from everyone's minds once and for all.</p></div></blockquote><p>I find your excess of faith disturbing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully George Lucas can wipe the memory of Jar Jar Binks , Anakin and Padme 's romance , his shameless merchandising , and some lame attempts at humor from everyone 's minds once and for all.I find your excess of faith disturbing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully George Lucas can wipe the memory of Jar Jar Binks, Anakin and Padme's romance, his shameless merchandising, and some lame attempts at humor from everyone's minds once and for all.I find your excess of faith disturbing.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31109636</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>DrStoooopid</author>
	<datestamp>1265911140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you paid attention in the first 3 movies, you wouldn't HAVE to be curious about how Vader came to be.</p><p>Face it, some things are best left to the imagination, and Darth Vader's origins was one of those things.</p><p>The second 3 movies, had great potential, but as Mark Hamill said, Lucas lost his way. Hell the extended universe in book form is more exciting than the 2nd three movies. I'd be more interested if he decided to set the TV series either in the time of the Solo twins (or even after) or back during the time of the Old Republic...or even the Sith wars.</p><p>I used to have nightmares about Darth Vader when I was a kid back in 1978 when the original came out. Imagine my disappointment when I found out he was just a whiny emo kid that beat up his girlfriend.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you paid attention in the first 3 movies , you would n't HAVE to be curious about how Vader came to be.Face it , some things are best left to the imagination , and Darth Vader 's origins was one of those things.The second 3 movies , had great potential , but as Mark Hamill said , Lucas lost his way .
Hell the extended universe in book form is more exciting than the 2nd three movies .
I 'd be more interested if he decided to set the TV series either in the time of the Solo twins ( or even after ) or back during the time of the Old Republic...or even the Sith wars.I used to have nightmares about Darth Vader when I was a kid back in 1978 when the original came out .
Imagine my disappointment when I found out he was just a whiny emo kid that beat up his girlfriend .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you paid attention in the first 3 movies, you wouldn't HAVE to be curious about how Vader came to be.Face it, some things are best left to the imagination, and Darth Vader's origins was one of those things.The second 3 movies, had great potential, but as Mark Hamill said, Lucas lost his way.
Hell the extended universe in book form is more exciting than the 2nd three movies.
I'd be more interested if he decided to set the TV series either in the time of the Solo twins (or even after) or back during the time of the Old Republic...or even the Sith wars.I used to have nightmares about Darth Vader when I was a kid back in 1978 when the original came out.
Imagine my disappointment when I found out he was just a whiny emo kid that beat up his girlfriend.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100670</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>srpape</author>
	<datestamp>1265908800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just because it has potential doesn't mean George can't screw it up.<br>Maybe having a smaller budget will actually improve the special effects frenzy, but he can still screw up the plot.</p><p>I hope he proves me wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just because it has potential does n't mean George ca n't screw it up.Maybe having a smaller budget will actually improve the special effects frenzy , but he can still screw up the plot.I hope he proves me wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just because it has potential doesn't mean George can't screw it up.Maybe having a smaller budget will actually improve the special effects frenzy, but he can still screw up the plot.I hope he proves me wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099506</id>
	<title>Re:Never mind prequels</title>
	<author>FlyingBishop</author>
	<datestamp>1265903520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's been done, re: The Thrawn Trilogy by Timothy Zahn. They could film it, but there's not much point.</p><p>What I want to see is a Ron Moore re-imagining of the original trilogy. Truth be told, what we have here might not be too bad. It sounds like it's going to follow Boba Fett's journey to becoming badass assassin/bounty hunter extraordinaire. Actually, if it's basically a film noir type private detective thing with Boba Fett as the antihero, it could be very very good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's been done , re : The Thrawn Trilogy by Timothy Zahn .
They could film it , but there 's not much point.What I want to see is a Ron Moore re-imagining of the original trilogy .
Truth be told , what we have here might not be too bad .
It sounds like it 's going to follow Boba Fett 's journey to becoming badass assassin/bounty hunter extraordinaire .
Actually , if it 's basically a film noir type private detective thing with Boba Fett as the antihero , it could be very very good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's been done, re: The Thrawn Trilogy by Timothy Zahn.
They could film it, but there's not much point.What I want to see is a Ron Moore re-imagining of the original trilogy.
Truth be told, what we have here might not be too bad.
It sounds like it's going to follow Boba Fett's journey to becoming badass assassin/bounty hunter extraordinaire.
Actually, if it's basically a film noir type private detective thing with Boba Fett as the antihero, it could be very very good.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31103016</id>
	<title>Queue the remakes...</title>
	<author>eyebum</author>
	<datestamp>1265918820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why not! Every other story in Hollywood gets remade eventually anyway. Some good (Battlestar Galactica, Star Trek), Some not so well (Psycho, Godzilla, Planet of the Apes...the list goes on).

What will happen to the franchise when some young rebel takes the Star Wars story and tells it in their own style?

I mean, aside from the massive merchandising tribute that would still need to be paid to Lucas, of course.

What if JJ Abrams took on 'Empire'?

Not much of a Michael Bay fan, but do think the battle for Endor in ROTJ might be scrapped in favor of the original battle for Kashyyyk with him at the controls?

It could happen...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not !
Every other story in Hollywood gets remade eventually anyway .
Some good ( Battlestar Galactica , Star Trek ) , Some not so well ( Psycho , Godzilla , Planet of the Apes...the list goes on ) .
What will happen to the franchise when some young rebel takes the Star Wars story and tells it in their own style ?
I mean , aside from the massive merchandising tribute that would still need to be paid to Lucas , of course .
What if JJ Abrams took on 'Empire ' ?
Not much of a Michael Bay fan , but do think the battle for Endor in ROTJ might be scrapped in favor of the original battle for Kashyyyk with him at the controls ?
It could happen.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not!
Every other story in Hollywood gets remade eventually anyway.
Some good (Battlestar Galactica, Star Trek), Some not so well (Psycho, Godzilla, Planet of the Apes...the list goes on).
What will happen to the franchise when some young rebel takes the Star Wars story and tells it in their own style?
I mean, aside from the massive merchandising tribute that would still need to be paid to Lucas, of course.
What if JJ Abrams took on 'Empire'?
Not much of a Michael Bay fan, but do think the battle for Endor in ROTJ might be scrapped in favor of the original battle for Kashyyyk with him at the controls?
It could happen...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099586</id>
	<title>Re:Latter Canceled. Need New Avenues.</title>
	<author>Fozzyuw</author>
	<datestamp>1265903880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I want the Timothy Zahn Trilogy done as three movies.</p></div><p>Absolutely, the Thrawn series is awesome and a great read... but, the problem I have with that is the Luke, Leigh, Han characters are firmly ensconced in Ford, Hammil, and Fisher and they're a little bit past their ability to really pull off the "hey, I'm like a year or so older than RotJ".  I don't think SW is in the same place as Star Trek in terms of being able to do a "reboot" of sorts or work like Batman where the lead character could be played by anyone.</p><p>However... in the "future" timeline that was written about in great detail, there's lot of potential to create an original series around new characters.  As beloved as the Skywalkers are, they've had their lime light and destiny and the SW universe is far more than just that important family.</p><p>In terms of quality, I've been rather impressed with the "Clone Wars" animated series.  Watching that has really stilled more excitement in Star Wars for me.  It almost makes me think episode I-III weren't that bad... until I watch them again.</p><p>Of course, Lukas could also go and do series about The Old Republic, but I would hate for that to corrupted the up-coming Bioware Old Republic MMO they're making by writing really bad story-lines that hamstrings that world.  I'm playing through Knights of the Old Republic right now and so far that's a pretty good game.</p><p>Of course... no matter what, I'll never forgive George for writing the stupid metaclorin or whatever part into the story.  *shudder*</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want the Timothy Zahn Trilogy done as three movies.Absolutely , the Thrawn series is awesome and a great read... but , the problem I have with that is the Luke , Leigh , Han characters are firmly ensconced in Ford , Hammil , and Fisher and they 're a little bit past their ability to really pull off the " hey , I 'm like a year or so older than RotJ " .
I do n't think SW is in the same place as Star Trek in terms of being able to do a " reboot " of sorts or work like Batman where the lead character could be played by anyone.However... in the " future " timeline that was written about in great detail , there 's lot of potential to create an original series around new characters .
As beloved as the Skywalkers are , they 've had their lime light and destiny and the SW universe is far more than just that important family.In terms of quality , I 've been rather impressed with the " Clone Wars " animated series .
Watching that has really stilled more excitement in Star Wars for me .
It almost makes me think episode I-III were n't that bad... until I watch them again.Of course , Lukas could also go and do series about The Old Republic , but I would hate for that to corrupted the up-coming Bioware Old Republic MMO they 're making by writing really bad story-lines that hamstrings that world .
I 'm playing through Knights of the Old Republic right now and so far that 's a pretty good game.Of course... no matter what , I 'll never forgive George for writing the stupid metaclorin or whatever part into the story .
* shudder *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want the Timothy Zahn Trilogy done as three movies.Absolutely, the Thrawn series is awesome and a great read... but, the problem I have with that is the Luke, Leigh, Han characters are firmly ensconced in Ford, Hammil, and Fisher and they're a little bit past their ability to really pull off the "hey, I'm like a year or so older than RotJ".
I don't think SW is in the same place as Star Trek in terms of being able to do a "reboot" of sorts or work like Batman where the lead character could be played by anyone.However... in the "future" timeline that was written about in great detail, there's lot of potential to create an original series around new characters.
As beloved as the Skywalkers are, they've had their lime light and destiny and the SW universe is far more than just that important family.In terms of quality, I've been rather impressed with the "Clone Wars" animated series.
Watching that has really stilled more excitement in Star Wars for me.
It almost makes me think episode I-III weren't that bad... until I watch them again.Of course, Lukas could also go and do series about The Old Republic, but I would hate for that to corrupted the up-coming Bioware Old Republic MMO they're making by writing really bad story-lines that hamstrings that world.
I'm playing through Knights of the Old Republic right now and so far that's a pretty good game.Of course... no matter what, I'll never forgive George for writing the stupid metaclorin or whatever part into the story.
*shudder*
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099348</id>
	<title>Lucas on Daily Show</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265902500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did you see Lucas on the Daily Show?  He really could care less.  Based on that interview he should change his name to Count De Monet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you see Lucas on the Daily Show ?
He really could care less .
Based on that interview he should change his name to Count De Monet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you see Lucas on the Daily Show?
He really could care less.
Based on that interview he should change his name to Count De Monet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31103356</id>
	<title>Re:Never mind prequels</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265920020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>We want sequels to Return of the Jedi. Wasn't he originally going to do 3 sets of trilogies: with the 3rd set later on, and the only common characters would be the 2 droids?</p></div><p>Read the Kevin J. Anderson novels from the Expanded Universe and realize that they're probably better than what Lucas could come up with. And Kevin J. Anderson novels were the worst things in the Star Wars universe before the prequels.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We want sequels to Return of the Jedi .
Was n't he originally going to do 3 sets of trilogies : with the 3rd set later on , and the only common characters would be the 2 droids ? Read the Kevin J. Anderson novels from the Expanded Universe and realize that they 're probably better than what Lucas could come up with .
And Kevin J. Anderson novels were the worst things in the Star Wars universe before the prequels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We want sequels to Return of the Jedi.
Wasn't he originally going to do 3 sets of trilogies: with the 3rd set later on, and the only common characters would be the 2 droids?Read the Kevin J. Anderson novels from the Expanded Universe and realize that they're probably better than what Lucas could come up with.
And Kevin J. Anderson novels were the worst things in the Star Wars universe before the prequels.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31109740</id>
	<title>Re:meh</title>
	<author>bar-agent</author>
	<datestamp>1265912400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I'll be waiting for CSI: Coruscant<br>"We found him in the Academy sewers and the burns on the decapitated corpse indicate lightsaber cuts, which means the killer is probably... *beat* It's not a Jedi that I'm looking for. Please move along. Move along!"</p></div></blockquote><p>Actually, there is a <i>Coruscant Nights</i> book series written like a noir detective story.</p><p>And if you like that idea, I can also recommend <i>The Sword-Edged Blonde</i>, <i>She Murdered Me With Science</i>, and <i>The Case of the Toxic Spell Dump.</i></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll be waiting for CSI : Coruscant " We found him in the Academy sewers and the burns on the decapitated corpse indicate lightsaber cuts , which means the killer is probably... * beat * It 's not a Jedi that I 'm looking for .
Please move along .
Move along !
" Actually , there is a Coruscant Nights book series written like a noir detective story.And if you like that idea , I can also recommend The Sword-Edged Blonde , She Murdered Me With Science , and The Case of the Toxic Spell Dump .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll be waiting for CSI: Coruscant"We found him in the Academy sewers and the burns on the decapitated corpse indicate lightsaber cuts, which means the killer is probably... *beat* It's not a Jedi that I'm looking for.
Please move along.
Move along!
"Actually, there is a Coruscant Nights book series written like a noir detective story.And if you like that idea, I can also recommend The Sword-Edged Blonde, She Murdered Me With Science, and The Case of the Toxic Spell Dump.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31102544</id>
	<title>Re:It's far too late...</title>
	<author>paro12</author>
	<datestamp>1265917440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>  He f*cked up the originals, and I just don't even care anymore if he ever releases a decent DVD of the originals.</p></div><p>They did release a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Star-Wars-Episode-IV-Widescreen/dp/B000FQJAIW" title="amazon.com" rel="nofollow"> DVD of the original theatrical release. </a> [amazon.com]  Sure it comes coupled with the 2004 re-release with all of George's "Fixes", but you can get it</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He f * cked up the originals , and I just do n't even care anymore if he ever releases a decent DVD of the originals.They did release a DVD of the original theatrical release .
[ amazon.com ] Sure it comes coupled with the 2004 re-release with all of George 's " Fixes " , but you can get it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  He f*cked up the originals, and I just don't even care anymore if he ever releases a decent DVD of the originals.They did release a  DVD of the original theatrical release.
[amazon.com]  Sure it comes coupled with the 2004 re-release with all of George's "Fixes", but you can get it
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100782</id>
	<title>darths and droids will clean you mind</title>
	<author>solsang</author>
	<datestamp>1265909340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Darths and droids has succesfully made me overcome my star wars traumas and even feel happy with jar jar binks and anakin;
start at the beginning here: <a href="http://www.darthsanddroids.net/episodes/0001.html" title="darthsanddroids.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.darthsanddroids.net/episodes/0001.html</a> [darthsanddroids.net]

Warning: after this you will never be able to see star wars in the same way again;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Darths and droids has succesfully made me overcome my star wars traumas and even feel happy with jar jar binks and anakin ; start at the beginning here : http : //www.darthsanddroids.net/episodes/0001.html [ darthsanddroids.net ] Warning : after this you will never be able to see star wars in the same way again ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Darths and droids has succesfully made me overcome my star wars traumas and even feel happy with jar jar binks and anakin;
start at the beginning here: http://www.darthsanddroids.net/episodes/0001.html [darthsanddroids.net]

Warning: after this you will never be able to see star wars in the same way again;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099104</id>
	<title>Hire the right person</title>
	<author>Montezumaa</author>
	<datestamp>1265901240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suggest that Jorge tell Rick McCallum to go away and hire Mr. Plinkett:  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/RedLetterMedia" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/user/RedLetterMedia</a> [youtube.com]  At least the guy can point the series in the proper direction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suggest that Jorge tell Rick McCallum to go away and hire Mr. Plinkett : http : //www.youtube.com/user/RedLetterMedia [ youtube.com ] At least the guy can point the series in the proper direction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suggest that Jorge tell Rick McCallum to go away and hire Mr. Plinkett:  http://www.youtube.com/user/RedLetterMedia [youtube.com]  At least the guy can point the series in the proper direction.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100962</id>
	<title>Re:"Much darker" my ass</title>
	<author>BoredAtWorkWhatElse</author>
	<datestamp>1265910360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It works pretty well for games though. Like:  "Doom 3 was much darker than it's predecessor."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It works pretty well for games though .
Like : " Doom 3 was much darker than it 's predecessor .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It works pretty well for games though.
Like:  "Doom 3 was much darker than it's predecessor.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099354</id>
	<title>Re:REAL ACTORS!</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1265902620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Alec Guiness and Peter Cushing in the 1st movie wasnt exactly unknown nor unreal actors at that time. And if a prequel was ever made, maybe would had some known actors of that time, but sadly (fortunately?) that never happened.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Alec Guiness and Peter Cushing in the 1st movie wasnt exactly unknown nor unreal actors at that time .
And if a prequel was ever made , maybe would had some known actors of that time , but sadly ( fortunately ?
) that never happened .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Alec Guiness and Peter Cushing in the 1st movie wasnt exactly unknown nor unreal actors at that time.
And if a prequel was ever made, maybe would had some known actors of that time, but sadly (fortunately?
) that never happened.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099946</id>
	<title>This could lead to some interesting story ideas</title>
	<author>TrippTDF</author>
	<datestamp>1265905500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This guy had some good ideas in this <a href="http://www.morningstar.nildram.co.uk/A\_New\_Sith.html" title="nildram.co.uk">essay</a> [nildram.co.uk].  You could expand on some of this and have a great story line.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This guy had some good ideas in this essay [ nildram.co.uk ] .
You could expand on some of this and have a great story line .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This guy had some good ideas in this essay [nildram.co.uk].
You could expand on some of this and have a great story line.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100182</id>
	<title>Give us a new story!</title>
	<author>Jim Hall</author>
	<datestamp>1265906640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dear George,</p><p>Look, I was a huge Star Wars nerd back in the day. I saw the original 'Star Wars', like, 1000 times in the theatre, and about a hojillion times on VHS. I had all the toys - it was easier to count the things I <em>didn't</em> have in the little Star Wars catalog/pamphlet that came with the toys, than count the things I <em>did</em> have. Loved 'Empire', and tried my best to love 'Jedi' even though it had dancing Ewoks in it. Honestly, though, you lost me with Episode 1, and totally killed that Star Wars geek in me with Episodes 2-3.</p><p>You won me back (somewhat) with 'The Clone Wars' animated series. I think it's that I don't really mind cheesy dialog when spoken by CGI-animated puppets in a CGI-animated show. (Note the difference between that and Jar Jar.) I really dig this show, and I watch it every week.</p><p>But I'm really worried about your plans to do a show about the "Dark Times" between Episodes 3-4. We know how that ends; you end up with Luke, Leia, Han, Chewie, Ben, Darth, and the gang. I don't want to see Luke Skywalker grow up, I don't want to know what it was like when he got his first pimple or kissed his first girl (or Jawa, whatever they do on Tatooine for entertainment.) I don't want to see how they built the first Imperial Star Destroyer, or installed the freaking air conditioning system in the Death Star.</p><p>If you must do something in the Star Wars universe, please <em>please</em> <b>please</b> give us a new story. What happens <em>after</em> the Empire crumbles, who takes charge then, how does the new Jedi order come about? There's a whole Expanded Universe Storyline you can play with there. And we don't know how any of it ends.</p><p>Sincerely,</p><p>a worried fan (reformed)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear George,Look , I was a huge Star Wars nerd back in the day .
I saw the original 'Star Wars ' , like , 1000 times in the theatre , and about a hojillion times on VHS .
I had all the toys - it was easier to count the things I did n't have in the little Star Wars catalog/pamphlet that came with the toys , than count the things I did have .
Loved 'Empire ' , and tried my best to love 'Jedi ' even though it had dancing Ewoks in it .
Honestly , though , you lost me with Episode 1 , and totally killed that Star Wars geek in me with Episodes 2-3.You won me back ( somewhat ) with 'The Clone Wars ' animated series .
I think it 's that I do n't really mind cheesy dialog when spoken by CGI-animated puppets in a CGI-animated show .
( Note the difference between that and Jar Jar .
) I really dig this show , and I watch it every week.But I 'm really worried about your plans to do a show about the " Dark Times " between Episodes 3-4 .
We know how that ends ; you end up with Luke , Leia , Han , Chewie , Ben , Darth , and the gang .
I do n't want to see Luke Skywalker grow up , I do n't want to know what it was like when he got his first pimple or kissed his first girl ( or Jawa , whatever they do on Tatooine for entertainment .
) I do n't want to see how they built the first Imperial Star Destroyer , or installed the freaking air conditioning system in the Death Star.If you must do something in the Star Wars universe , please please please give us a new story .
What happens after the Empire crumbles , who takes charge then , how does the new Jedi order come about ?
There 's a whole Expanded Universe Storyline you can play with there .
And we do n't know how any of it ends.Sincerely,a worried fan ( reformed )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear George,Look, I was a huge Star Wars nerd back in the day.
I saw the original 'Star Wars', like, 1000 times in the theatre, and about a hojillion times on VHS.
I had all the toys - it was easier to count the things I didn't have in the little Star Wars catalog/pamphlet that came with the toys, than count the things I did have.
Loved 'Empire', and tried my best to love 'Jedi' even though it had dancing Ewoks in it.
Honestly, though, you lost me with Episode 1, and totally killed that Star Wars geek in me with Episodes 2-3.You won me back (somewhat) with 'The Clone Wars' animated series.
I think it's that I don't really mind cheesy dialog when spoken by CGI-animated puppets in a CGI-animated show.
(Note the difference between that and Jar Jar.
) I really dig this show, and I watch it every week.But I'm really worried about your plans to do a show about the "Dark Times" between Episodes 3-4.
We know how that ends; you end up with Luke, Leia, Han, Chewie, Ben, Darth, and the gang.
I don't want to see Luke Skywalker grow up, I don't want to know what it was like when he got his first pimple or kissed his first girl (or Jawa, whatever they do on Tatooine for entertainment.
) I don't want to see how they built the first Imperial Star Destroyer, or installed the freaking air conditioning system in the Death Star.If you must do something in the Star Wars universe, please please please give us a new story.
What happens after the Empire crumbles, who takes charge then, how does the new Jedi order come about?
There's a whole Expanded Universe Storyline you can play with there.
And we don't know how any of it ends.Sincerely,a worried fan (reformed)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098816</id>
	<title>Thanks a lot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265899860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"Hopefully George Lucas can wipe the memory of Jar Jar Binks, Anakin and Padme's romance, his shameless merchandising, and some lame attempts at humor from everyone's minds once and for all."</i> <br> <br>
I had managed to block all that crap from my consciousness. That is, until you brought it up again just now. Thanks a lot - you can expect to see my therapist's bill.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Hopefully George Lucas can wipe the memory of Jar Jar Binks , Anakin and Padme 's romance , his shameless merchandising , and some lame attempts at humor from everyone 's minds once and for all .
" I had managed to block all that crap from my consciousness .
That is , until you brought it up again just now .
Thanks a lot - you can expect to see my therapist 's bill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Hopefully George Lucas can wipe the memory of Jar Jar Binks, Anakin and Padme's romance, his shameless merchandising, and some lame attempts at humor from everyone's minds once and for all.
"  
I had managed to block all that crap from my consciousness.
That is, until you brought it up again just now.
Thanks a lot - you can expect to see my therapist's bill.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31103784</id>
	<title>Re:Hey, Polyanna</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265921640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No need to wipe the memory of anything, because the prequels were fantastic.  Everyone knows it except those who jumped on the Lucas-bashing bandwagon.  Even those people plopped down their $10 to see each and every prequel, probably more than once.  Jar Jar, Anakin/Padme, etc were a perfect addition to the saga, and anything else GL wants to do is just fine.  As for "shameless merchandising"....man you people crack me up.  Is he not supposed to sell things?  Is he not supposed to make money?  Why is it okay for every other movie to showcase toys and collectibles for a profit, but yet when GL does it, it becomes "shameless"?  LOL....keep on bashing, you know you'll be glued to the TV when the series comes out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No need to wipe the memory of anything , because the prequels were fantastic .
Everyone knows it except those who jumped on the Lucas-bashing bandwagon .
Even those people plopped down their $ 10 to see each and every prequel , probably more than once .
Jar Jar , Anakin/Padme , etc were a perfect addition to the saga , and anything else GL wants to do is just fine .
As for " shameless merchandising " ....man you people crack me up .
Is he not supposed to sell things ?
Is he not supposed to make money ?
Why is it okay for every other movie to showcase toys and collectibles for a profit , but yet when GL does it , it becomes " shameless " ?
LOL....keep on bashing , you know you 'll be glued to the TV when the series comes out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No need to wipe the memory of anything, because the prequels were fantastic.
Everyone knows it except those who jumped on the Lucas-bashing bandwagon.
Even those people plopped down their $10 to see each and every prequel, probably more than once.
Jar Jar, Anakin/Padme, etc were a perfect addition to the saga, and anything else GL wants to do is just fine.
As for "shameless merchandising"....man you people crack me up.
Is he not supposed to sell things?
Is he not supposed to make money?
Why is it okay for every other movie to showcase toys and collectibles for a profit, but yet when GL does it, it becomes "shameless"?
LOL....keep on bashing, you know you'll be glued to the TV when the series comes out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099476</id>
	<title>No Hero's Journey</title>
	<author>geoffrobinson</author>
	<datestamp>1265903280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The reason the original trilogy wasn't nearly as good (although I felt Episode III was very good) is that the type of story that everyone loves is the hero's journey. Reluctant young kid is someone special and didn't realize it and with help of some wizards/wise older guys triumphs over great forces of evil.</p><p>Well the prequels couldn't be that. One, it had to be a tragedy. Two, you also had to explain how the emperor rose to power. I think the second set of stories is what really drug down the prequels. That's where all the "who built the clones?" and the intergalactic trade federation crap came in. It became interesting in the third act but made for a boring overall story in the first two.</p><p>Plus, all the setup for Anakin's fall had to be there. And, frankly, that was all somewhat boring as well. In other words, it wasn't a hero's journey type of story.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason the original trilogy was n't nearly as good ( although I felt Episode III was very good ) is that the type of story that everyone loves is the hero 's journey .
Reluctant young kid is someone special and did n't realize it and with help of some wizards/wise older guys triumphs over great forces of evil.Well the prequels could n't be that .
One , it had to be a tragedy .
Two , you also had to explain how the emperor rose to power .
I think the second set of stories is what really drug down the prequels .
That 's where all the " who built the clones ?
" and the intergalactic trade federation crap came in .
It became interesting in the third act but made for a boring overall story in the first two.Plus , all the setup for Anakin 's fall had to be there .
And , frankly , that was all somewhat boring as well .
In other words , it was n't a hero 's journey type of story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason the original trilogy wasn't nearly as good (although I felt Episode III was very good) is that the type of story that everyone loves is the hero's journey.
Reluctant young kid is someone special and didn't realize it and with help of some wizards/wise older guys triumphs over great forces of evil.Well the prequels couldn't be that.
One, it had to be a tragedy.
Two, you also had to explain how the emperor rose to power.
I think the second set of stories is what really drug down the prequels.
That's where all the "who built the clones?
" and the intergalactic trade federation crap came in.
It became interesting in the third act but made for a boring overall story in the first two.Plus, all the setup for Anakin's fall had to be there.
And, frankly, that was all somewhat boring as well.
In other words, it wasn't a hero's journey type of story.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099464</id>
	<title>snap poll</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1265903220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can I get a show of hands?</p><p>How many of you believe that spacefaring races that travel among the stars will still have princesses?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I get a show of hands ? How many of you believe that spacefaring races that travel among the stars will still have princesses ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I get a show of hands?How many of you believe that spacefaring races that travel among the stars will still have princesses?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100318</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>hazydave</author>
	<datestamp>1265907180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well... yeah, it could. The best possible case is that George Lucas takes on the role of "executive producer" or some such. Maybe even suggests some story ideas, or Star Wars Universe ground rules. But really, he needs to do this from a galaxy far, far away from any actual work on any actual scripts.</p><p>The first rumors of a Star Wars TV show had Kevin Smith leading the project. This would be great.. particularly because "Star Wars" would now be set in New Jersey, rather than that afore-allusioned-to galaxy. Or maybe they'll save that for "Star Wars: 2014"... which will feature Boba Fett and Master Yoda, riding around the Garden State on golden motorcycles, solving individual problems, while the rest of the rebel fleet hides somewhere, for no particular reason other than to save money on FX shots.</p><p>But, particularly if they do it as a Star-Trek style episodic rather than a Babylon 5-style serial, they should make like the old Twilight Zone and Star Trek:TOS folks and solicit stories from actual writers. Otherwise, they had better find some spectacular staff writers, or they'll wind up as boring as most of the post-TOS Star Treks were. Sure, they had a few good stories in there, but way too many "holodeck malfunction" tales, and way, way, way, way too many deus ex machina endings.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well... yeah , it could .
The best possible case is that George Lucas takes on the role of " executive producer " or some such .
Maybe even suggests some story ideas , or Star Wars Universe ground rules .
But really , he needs to do this from a galaxy far , far away from any actual work on any actual scripts.The first rumors of a Star Wars TV show had Kevin Smith leading the project .
This would be great.. particularly because " Star Wars " would now be set in New Jersey , rather than that afore-allusioned-to galaxy .
Or maybe they 'll save that for " Star Wars : 2014 " ... which will feature Boba Fett and Master Yoda , riding around the Garden State on golden motorcycles , solving individual problems , while the rest of the rebel fleet hides somewhere , for no particular reason other than to save money on FX shots.But , particularly if they do it as a Star-Trek style episodic rather than a Babylon 5-style serial , they should make like the old Twilight Zone and Star Trek : TOS folks and solicit stories from actual writers .
Otherwise , they had better find some spectacular staff writers , or they 'll wind up as boring as most of the post-TOS Star Treks were .
Sure , they had a few good stories in there , but way too many " holodeck malfunction " tales , and way , way , way , way too many deus ex machina endings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well... yeah, it could.
The best possible case is that George Lucas takes on the role of "executive producer" or some such.
Maybe even suggests some story ideas, or Star Wars Universe ground rules.
But really, he needs to do this from a galaxy far, far away from any actual work on any actual scripts.The first rumors of a Star Wars TV show had Kevin Smith leading the project.
This would be great.. particularly because "Star Wars" would now be set in New Jersey, rather than that afore-allusioned-to galaxy.
Or maybe they'll save that for "Star Wars: 2014"... which will feature Boba Fett and Master Yoda, riding around the Garden State on golden motorcycles, solving individual problems, while the rest of the rebel fleet hides somewhere, for no particular reason other than to save money on FX shots.But, particularly if they do it as a Star-Trek style episodic rather than a Babylon 5-style serial, they should make like the old Twilight Zone and Star Trek:TOS folks and solicit stories from actual writers.
Otherwise, they had better find some spectacular staff writers, or they'll wind up as boring as most of the post-TOS Star Treks were.
Sure, they had a few good stories in there, but way too many "holodeck malfunction" tales, and way, way, way, way too many deus ex machina endings.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099214</id>
	<title>Re:"Much darker" my ass</title>
	<author>paulhar</author>
	<datestamp>1265901960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; These days "Much darker than its predecessor" has become Hollywood doublespeak. It means nothing.</p><p>Maybe they're much darker because they're 3d?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; These days " Much darker than its predecessor " has become Hollywood doublespeak .
It means nothing.Maybe they 're much darker because they 're 3d ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; These days "Much darker than its predecessor" has become Hollywood doublespeak.
It means nothing.Maybe they're much darker because they're 3d?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31109580</id>
	<title>I liked the loveable Jar Jar Binks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265910420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I liked Jar Jar Binks.

He made the movie seem so real.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I liked Jar Jar Binks .
He made the movie seem so real .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I liked Jar Jar Binks.
He made the movie seem so real.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101444</id>
	<title>Better let the new kids decide</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265913000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have shown Star wars phantom menace to my 4 and a half year old boy and Star wars episode 4</p><p>Guess what? Star wars episode 4 won hands down.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have shown Star wars phantom menace to my 4 and a half year old boy and Star wars episode 4Guess what ?
Star wars episode 4 won hands down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have shown Star wars phantom menace to my 4 and a half year old boy and Star wars episode 4Guess what?
Star wars episode 4 won hands down.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099710</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1265904540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No there isn't.  It's a fertile ground for a movie, maybe a movie trilogy, not an unending episodic series in which every forty minutes there comes a time when "everything goes back how it was."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No there is n't .
It 's a fertile ground for a movie , maybe a movie trilogy , not an unending episodic series in which every forty minutes there comes a time when " everything goes back how it was .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No there isn't.
It's a fertile ground for a movie, maybe a movie trilogy, not an unending episodic series in which every forty minutes there comes a time when "everything goes back how it was.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100868</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1265909880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's so much potential for a good show in that era.</p></div><p>Naturally, this means it will almost certainly be screwed up beyond belief. It's always the things with the most potential that fail the hardest, while those that seem improbable and unlikely are the most successful.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's so much potential for a good show in that era.Naturally , this means it will almost certainly be screwed up beyond belief .
It 's always the things with the most potential that fail the hardest , while those that seem improbable and unlikely are the most successful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's so much potential for a good show in that era.Naturally, this means it will almost certainly be screwed up beyond belief.
It's always the things with the most potential that fail the hardest, while those that seem improbable and unlikely are the most successful.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100522</id>
	<title>Re:"Much darker" my ass</title>
	<author>dcollins</author>
	<datestamp>1265908080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"These days 'Much darker than its predecessor' has become Hollywood doublespeak. It means nothing."</p><p>Agreed. My guess is that where Ep. I had Jar-Jar "step in the poopy" for no good effect, this stuff will see one person awkwardly killed for no good plot reason.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" These days 'Much darker than its predecessor ' has become Hollywood doublespeak .
It means nothing. " Agreed .
My guess is that where Ep .
I had Jar-Jar " step in the poopy " for no good effect , this stuff will see one person awkwardly killed for no good plot reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"These days 'Much darker than its predecessor' has become Hollywood doublespeak.
It means nothing."Agreed.
My guess is that where Ep.
I had Jar-Jar "step in the poopy" for no good effect, this stuff will see one person awkwardly killed for no good plot reason.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31103496</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>stonefry</author>
	<datestamp>1265920560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't care how the stuff that I like was made, I just like the stuff that I like.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't care how the stuff that I like was made , I just like the stuff that I like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't care how the stuff that I like was made, I just like the stuff that I like.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099766</id>
	<title>I, for one, am tired of the anti-Jar Jar nerdrage</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265904780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>coming from 40-somethings whose prepubescent selves likely giggled with glee when a bunch of teddy bears with spears and slingshots defeated an Imperial garrison.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>coming from 40-somethings whose prepubescent selves likely giggled with glee when a bunch of teddy bears with spears and slingshots defeated an Imperial garrison .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>coming from 40-somethings whose prepubescent selves likely giggled with glee when a bunch of teddy bears with spears and slingshots defeated an Imperial garrison.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099078</id>
	<title>Re:Never mind prequels</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265901060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The storyline for what would have been the third trilogy was compressed into Return of the Jedi.  There is no third trilogy waiting to be made.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The storyline for what would have been the third trilogy was compressed into Return of the Jedi .
There is no third trilogy waiting to be made .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The storyline for what would have been the third trilogy was compressed into Return of the Jedi.
There is no third trilogy waiting to be made.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100492</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265907840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No there isn't.  It's a fertile ground for a movie, maybe a movie trilogy, not an unending episodic series in which every forty minutes there comes a time when "everything goes back how it was."</p></div><p>On the other hand, you can have a series with a major story arc that gets advanced.  Regardless of whatever else you think about Bablyon 5, it very much <b>was not</b> a collection of unconnected episodes where the setting was re-initialized after the closing credits of each episode.  Another recent example, although to a somewhat lesser extent, would be Farscape.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No there is n't .
It 's a fertile ground for a movie , maybe a movie trilogy , not an unending episodic series in which every forty minutes there comes a time when " everything goes back how it was .
" On the other hand , you can have a series with a major story arc that gets advanced .
Regardless of whatever else you think about Bablyon 5 , it very much was not a collection of unconnected episodes where the setting was re-initialized after the closing credits of each episode .
Another recent example , although to a somewhat lesser extent , would be Farscape .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No there isn't.
It's a fertile ground for a movie, maybe a movie trilogy, not an unending episodic series in which every forty minutes there comes a time when "everything goes back how it was.
"On the other hand, you can have a series with a major story arc that gets advanced.
Regardless of whatever else you think about Bablyon 5, it very much was not a collection of unconnected episodes where the setting was re-initialized after the closing credits of each episode.
Another recent example, although to a somewhat lesser extent, would be Farscape.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098830</id>
	<title>The Xmas Special Effect</title>
	<author>Fiverx2</author>
	<datestamp>1265899920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As long as its better than the Xmas special that most of us try to forget, I'll give it a shot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as its better than the Xmas special that most of us try to forget , I 'll give it a shot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as its better than the Xmas special that most of us try to forget, I'll give it a shot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099914</id>
	<title>At the risk of crossing the SciFi streams</title>
	<author>sizzzzlerz</author>
	<datestamp>1265905380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its dead, Jim.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its dead , Jim .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its dead, Jim.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100346</id>
	<title>If they want to rip something off....</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1265907300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should rip off Blakes 7.   They should follow a Jedi Knight who was away on trade mission or presumed dead before the Jedi Holocaust.   He can come back to the Galactic Center finding a galaxy that has changed.   So he starts his own little rebellion.</p><p>In the last episode have him killed off like the cast of Blakes 7.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should rip off Blakes 7 .
They should follow a Jedi Knight who was away on trade mission or presumed dead before the Jedi Holocaust .
He can come back to the Galactic Center finding a galaxy that has changed .
So he starts his own little rebellion.In the last episode have him killed off like the cast of Blakes 7 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should rip off Blakes 7.
They should follow a Jedi Knight who was away on trade mission or presumed dead before the Jedi Holocaust.
He can come back to the Galactic Center finding a galaxy that has changed.
So he starts his own little rebellion.In the last episode have him killed off like the cast of Blakes 7.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099178</id>
	<title>Christmas special</title>
	<author>Via\_Patrino</author>
	<datestamp>1265901720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who doesn't remember that Christmas special? Can't be worse than that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who does n't remember that Christmas special ?
Ca n't be worse than that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who doesn't remember that Christmas special?
Can't be worse than that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098840</id>
	<title>The first is still the best</title>
	<author>aurispector</author>
	<datestamp>1265899980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I recall watching the original Ep.4 as a 12 year old.  The bar scene was particularly intense because it showed humans as a bit player in a big, bad universe.  Fast forward to the updated remake with the CGI singer - just another funny looking alien to laugh at.  The two headed announcer in the pod race scene is another example - funny aliens who exist primarily for the amusement of a human dominated universe. I don't think Lucas ever grasped this difference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I recall watching the original Ep.4 as a 12 year old .
The bar scene was particularly intense because it showed humans as a bit player in a big , bad universe .
Fast forward to the updated remake with the CGI singer - just another funny looking alien to laugh at .
The two headed announcer in the pod race scene is another example - funny aliens who exist primarily for the amusement of a human dominated universe .
I do n't think Lucas ever grasped this difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I recall watching the original Ep.4 as a 12 year old.
The bar scene was particularly intense because it showed humans as a bit player in a big, bad universe.
Fast forward to the updated remake with the CGI singer - just another funny looking alien to laugh at.
The two headed announcer in the pod race scene is another example - funny aliens who exist primarily for the amusement of a human dominated universe.
I don't think Lucas ever grasped this difference.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100530</id>
	<title>Re:REAL ACTORS!</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1265908080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It would be the first time real actors were used in the entire Star Wars Saga</i></p><p>What? Alec Guinness isn't an actor? He got an Oscar for that role! And he had a stllar acting career long before Star Wars; he was respected in his profession. Ewan McGregor wasn't bad, either. How about James earl Jones, the voice of Darth Vader? He's not an actor?</p><p>WTF?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be the first time real actors were used in the entire Star Wars SagaWhat ?
Alec Guinness is n't an actor ?
He got an Oscar for that role !
And he had a stllar acting career long before Star Wars ; he was respected in his profession .
Ewan McGregor was n't bad , either .
How about James earl Jones , the voice of Darth Vader ?
He 's not an actor ? WTF ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be the first time real actors were used in the entire Star Wars SagaWhat?
Alec Guinness isn't an actor?
He got an Oscar for that role!
And he had a stllar acting career long before Star Wars; he was respected in his profession.
Ewan McGregor wasn't bad, either.
How about James earl Jones, the voice of Darth Vader?
He's not an actor?WTF?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100278</id>
	<title>Re:Never mind prequels</title>
	<author>Artifakt</author>
	<datestamp>1265907060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think 'originally' applies. I'm old enough to remember the first movie premier, and the talk about sequels and such started in the press after the film proved to be an unexpected hit. The mention of multiple trilogies began after quite a few other rumors had circulated in the press for a few weeks, in a way that suggested, to me at least, that it wasn't really the plan all along but something the studio now wanted to claim. As Episode 5's pre-release hype built up, the line about 9 films was pushed a lot, maybe because the public would accept a whole film where the good guys mostly lose better, if it was seen as a smaller part of the whole.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I know the scrolling bit at the start of the original said Episode 4, but as Raiders of the Lost Ark proves, there was much interest at the time in recapturing some of the old Republic serial feel for films, and it builds dramatic tension by suggesting the film is part of a larger whole set in the same fictiverse. That doesn't prove much else in the fictiverse was even roughed out, let alone developed. Lucas's mental notes for the rest, at the time Episode 4 was released may have been just "It's a place where a lot of wars between whole planets have happened."<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; In the same way, lines from the first film, such as the reference to Obi-Wan knowing Luke's father from the Clone Wars, sound like throw away lines - where the writer in effect says to themselves "Let's see, I can't say they met in Nam, because it's Sci-Fi, and just saying they met in the war sounds too generic, so what do I call the frelling war?" Probably, when Lucas wrote the line, he had no particular idea why the war was called the Clone Wars, or which side the Clones were on, or any of that - it was just to present a surface gloss of verisimilitude. Writers do that when they don't plan on needing more detailed answers, then an unexpected demand for sequils leaves them looking back through the original script for things they can develop.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; A good example of this might be the point in the original Matrix where Trinity tells Neo he's been down that road before. That line could have been used to spin off a matrix sequel very different from the ones we got, and the studio would doubtless have claimed that it was the plan all along if that had happened.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think 'originally ' applies .
I 'm old enough to remember the first movie premier , and the talk about sequels and such started in the press after the film proved to be an unexpected hit .
The mention of multiple trilogies began after quite a few other rumors had circulated in the press for a few weeks , in a way that suggested , to me at least , that it was n't really the plan all along but something the studio now wanted to claim .
As Episode 5 's pre-release hype built up , the line about 9 films was pushed a lot , maybe because the public would accept a whole film where the good guys mostly lose better , if it was seen as a smaller part of the whole .
      I know the scrolling bit at the start of the original said Episode 4 , but as Raiders of the Lost Ark proves , there was much interest at the time in recapturing some of the old Republic serial feel for films , and it builds dramatic tension by suggesting the film is part of a larger whole set in the same fictiverse .
That does n't prove much else in the fictiverse was even roughed out , let alone developed .
Lucas 's mental notes for the rest , at the time Episode 4 was released may have been just " It 's a place where a lot of wars between whole planets have happened .
"       In the same way , lines from the first film , such as the reference to Obi-Wan knowing Luke 's father from the Clone Wars , sound like throw away lines - where the writer in effect says to themselves " Let 's see , I ca n't say they met in Nam , because it 's Sci-Fi , and just saying they met in the war sounds too generic , so what do I call the frelling war ?
" Probably , when Lucas wrote the line , he had no particular idea why the war was called the Clone Wars , or which side the Clones were on , or any of that - it was just to present a surface gloss of verisimilitude .
Writers do that when they do n't plan on needing more detailed answers , then an unexpected demand for sequils leaves them looking back through the original script for things they can develop .
      A good example of this might be the point in the original Matrix where Trinity tells Neo he 's been down that road before .
That line could have been used to spin off a matrix sequel very different from the ones we got , and the studio would doubtless have claimed that it was the plan all along if that had happened .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think 'originally' applies.
I'm old enough to remember the first movie premier, and the talk about sequels and such started in the press after the film proved to be an unexpected hit.
The mention of multiple trilogies began after quite a few other rumors had circulated in the press for a few weeks, in a way that suggested, to me at least, that it wasn't really the plan all along but something the studio now wanted to claim.
As Episode 5's pre-release hype built up, the line about 9 films was pushed a lot, maybe because the public would accept a whole film where the good guys mostly lose better, if it was seen as a smaller part of the whole.
      I know the scrolling bit at the start of the original said Episode 4, but as Raiders of the Lost Ark proves, there was much interest at the time in recapturing some of the old Republic serial feel for films, and it builds dramatic tension by suggesting the film is part of a larger whole set in the same fictiverse.
That doesn't prove much else in the fictiverse was even roughed out, let alone developed.
Lucas's mental notes for the rest, at the time Episode 4 was released may have been just "It's a place where a lot of wars between whole planets have happened.
"
      In the same way, lines from the first film, such as the reference to Obi-Wan knowing Luke's father from the Clone Wars, sound like throw away lines - where the writer in effect says to themselves "Let's see, I can't say they met in Nam, because it's Sci-Fi, and just saying they met in the war sounds too generic, so what do I call the frelling war?
" Probably, when Lucas wrote the line, he had no particular idea why the war was called the Clone Wars, or which side the Clones were on, or any of that - it was just to present a surface gloss of verisimilitude.
Writers do that when they don't plan on needing more detailed answers, then an unexpected demand for sequils leaves them looking back through the original script for things they can develop.
      A good example of this might be the point in the original Matrix where Trinity tells Neo he's been down that road before.
That line could have been used to spin off a matrix sequel very different from the ones we got, and the studio would doubtless have claimed that it was the plan all along if that had happened.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099188</id>
	<title>Re:Never mind prequels</title>
	<author>TBoon</author>
	<datestamp>1265901780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Among one of the things I've heard was that he said (at the time of making the prequels) that he didn't want to make episode 7-9 because he "would be too old for that" by the end of it... Guess he changed his mind, as well as the setting and format...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Among one of the things I 've heard was that he said ( at the time of making the prequels ) that he did n't want to make episode 7-9 because he " would be too old for that " by the end of it... Guess he changed his mind , as well as the setting and format.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Among one of the things I've heard was that he said (at the time of making the prequels) that he didn't want to make episode 7-9 because he "would be too old for that" by the end of it... Guess he changed his mind, as well as the setting and format...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099344</id>
	<title>More Sith</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265902500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey Lucas,<br> <br>
Instead of rehashing the train wreck you made of the Skywalker Saga, why don't you tell the story of the splitting of the Jedi and the Sith.  In The Phantom Menace, Darth Maul says "At last we will reveal ourselves to the Jedi. At last we will have revenge."  Tell THAT story: why they are in hiding; what are they getting revenge for.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey Lucas , Instead of rehashing the train wreck you made of the Skywalker Saga , why do n't you tell the story of the splitting of the Jedi and the Sith .
In The Phantom Menace , Darth Maul says " At last we will reveal ourselves to the Jedi .
At last we will have revenge .
" Tell THAT story : why they are in hiding ; what are they getting revenge for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey Lucas, 
Instead of rehashing the train wreck you made of the Skywalker Saga, why don't you tell the story of the splitting of the Jedi and the Sith.
In The Phantom Menace, Darth Maul says "At last we will reveal ourselves to the Jedi.
At last we will have revenge.
"  Tell THAT story: why they are in hiding; what are they getting revenge for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31150090</id>
	<title>Re:Never mind prequels</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266235680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh!  Palpatine was a cylon!  Makes so much sense now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh !
Palpatine was a cylon !
Makes so much sense now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh!
Palpatine was a cylon!
Makes so much sense now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099626</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>jalefkowit</author>
	<datestamp>1265904120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Assuming it <i>survives</i> to season two.  One season is plenty of time for Lucas to drive it into the side of a mountain.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Assuming it survives to season two .
One season is plenty of time for Lucas to drive it into the side of a mountain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Assuming it survives to season two.
One season is plenty of time for Lucas to drive it into the side of a mountain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100896</id>
	<title>Re:"Much darker" my ass</title>
	<author>Vorpix</author>
	<datestamp>1265910000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>gritty!?  the new show will be garbage if it doesn't feature natalie portman naked and petrified and covered in hot grits.</p><p>(P.S. mods: this is a homage to vintage<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/., not a genuine troll)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>gritty ! ?
the new show will be garbage if it does n't feature natalie portman naked and petrified and covered in hot grits. ( P.S .
mods : this is a homage to vintage /. , not a genuine troll )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>gritty!?
the new show will be garbage if it doesn't feature natalie portman naked and petrified and covered in hot grits.(P.S.
mods: this is a homage to vintage /., not a genuine troll)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100834</id>
	<title>Re:It's far too late...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265909640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>lol</p><p>only on slashdot would some loser taking *children's films* this seriously be modded at +5. at least it's as "interesting" instead of "insightful".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>lolonly on slashdot would some loser taking * children 's films * this seriously be modded at + 5 .
at least it 's as " interesting " instead of " insightful " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lolonly on slashdot would some loser taking *children's films* this seriously be modded at +5.
at least it's as "interesting" instead of "insightful".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101218</id>
	<title>Re:"Much darker" my ass</title>
	<author>domatic</author>
	<datestamp>1265911740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Much Darker" also means the body count of the minor characters will go up.  Might as well put red shirts on Sirius Black and Cedric Diggory.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Much Darker " also means the body count of the minor characters will go up .
Might as well put red shirts on Sirius Black and Cedric Diggory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Much Darker" also means the body count of the minor characters will go up.
Might as well put red shirts on Sirius Black and Cedric Diggory.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31105642</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265885520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The reason Lucas made the films in the first place is because everyone was curious about how Darth Vader became Darth Vader.</p></div><p>Speak for yourself. In <i>Star Wars,</i> Darth Vader was the bad guy. He wore black. He did mean things. He was a scary guy. Every fable has a bad guy, and in <i>Star Wars</i>, Darth Vader was it. Never, not for one moment, did I ever think to myself, "Gee, I wonder what Darth Vader was like when he was a little kid?"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason Lucas made the films in the first place is because everyone was curious about how Darth Vader became Darth Vader.Speak for yourself .
In Star Wars , Darth Vader was the bad guy .
He wore black .
He did mean things .
He was a scary guy .
Every fable has a bad guy , and in Star Wars , Darth Vader was it .
Never , not for one moment , did I ever think to myself , " Gee , I wonder what Darth Vader was like when he was a little kid ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason Lucas made the films in the first place is because everyone was curious about how Darth Vader became Darth Vader.Speak for yourself.
In Star Wars, Darth Vader was the bad guy.
He wore black.
He did mean things.
He was a scary guy.
Every fable has a bad guy, and in Star Wars, Darth Vader was it.
Never, not for one moment, did I ever think to myself, "Gee, I wonder what Darth Vader was like when he was a little kid?
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098812</id>
	<title>Hey, Polyanna</title>
	<author>geminidomino</author>
	<datestamp>1265899800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Hopefully George Lucas can wipe the memory of Jar Jar Binks, Anakin and Padme's romance, his shameless merchandising, and some lame attempts at humor from everyone's minds once and for all.</p></div><p>Don't bet on it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully George Lucas can wipe the memory of Jar Jar Binks , Anakin and Padme 's romance , his shameless merchandising , and some lame attempts at humor from everyone 's minds once and for all.Do n't bet on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully George Lucas can wipe the memory of Jar Jar Binks, Anakin and Padme's romance, his shameless merchandising, and some lame attempts at humor from everyone's minds once and for all.Don't bet on it.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101458</id>
	<title>Re:Hey, Polyanna</title>
	<author>formfeed</author>
	<datestamp>1265913000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, since it's supposed to be with real actors and "darker", JarJar will not only come back, but we will also be introduced to Aunt Jemima Binks, who make 'em dambest pancakes in the whole  'hood.  - Happy African American history month everyone. &lt;/sarcasm&gt;</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , since it 's supposed to be with real actors and " darker " , JarJar will not only come back , but we will also be introduced to Aunt Jemima Binks , who make 'em dambest pancakes in the whole 'hood .
- Happy African American history month everyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, since it's supposed to be with real actors and "darker", JarJar will not only come back, but we will also be introduced to Aunt Jemima Binks, who make 'em dambest pancakes in the whole  'hood.
- Happy African American history month everyone. </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099222</id>
	<title>Euwww</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265902020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Hopefully George Lucas can wipe the memory of Jar Jar Binks, Anakin and Padme's romance</p></div><p>I must have missed this perverse threesome when I watched the film.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully George Lucas can wipe the memory of Jar Jar Binks , Anakin and Padme 's romanceI must have missed this perverse threesome when I watched the film .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully George Lucas can wipe the memory of Jar Jar Binks, Anakin and Padme's romanceI must have missed this perverse threesome when I watched the film.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31104204</id>
	<title>Re:I, for one, am tired of the anti-Jar Jar nerdra</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265880000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're not very good at arithmetic, are you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're not very good at arithmetic , are you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're not very good at arithmetic, are you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31102534</id>
	<title>Re:I, for one, am tired of the anti-Jar Jar nerdra</title>
	<author>16K Ram Pack</author>
	<datestamp>1265917380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was old enough to be annoyed at little kids laughing at the ewoks.</p><p>On the other hand, I'm going to defend the ewoks... The main thing about the ewoks is that they are small, primitive and yet, take on the empire and win. And yes, they look like teddy bears, but they're quite badass (like they're going to eat everyone at the start).</p><p>Jar-Jar, on the other hand, was just annoying.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was old enough to be annoyed at little kids laughing at the ewoks.On the other hand , I 'm going to defend the ewoks... The main thing about the ewoks is that they are small , primitive and yet , take on the empire and win .
And yes , they look like teddy bears , but they 're quite badass ( like they 're going to eat everyone at the start ) .Jar-Jar , on the other hand , was just annoying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was old enough to be annoyed at little kids laughing at the ewoks.On the other hand, I'm going to defend the ewoks... The main thing about the ewoks is that they are small, primitive and yet, take on the empire and win.
And yes, they look like teddy bears, but they're quite badass (like they're going to eat everyone at the start).Jar-Jar, on the other hand, was just annoying.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101450</id>
	<title>Use BSG crew</title>
	<author>Micahsa</author>
	<datestamp>1265913000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The most well done sci-fi drama in recent years (arguably the best drama of last few decades) is Battlestar Galactica.  BSG got it right becuase they focused on the character development, writing and realism (accuracy is probably a better term) rather than focusing on the amount of sci-fi content and adding the rest later on.  Viewers who would cringe to watch anything science fiction related were quickly absorbed into the show in the same way non-sci-fi readers become absorbed in Orson Scott Card's 'Ender's Game' series -- becuase both creations are GOOD, WELL WRITTEN, WELL EXECUTED DRAMA'S in a science fiction setting.  You could forget about the cylons and the prophecies and all the rest because the drama was excellent and not dependant on any special effects or sci-fi knowledge.</p><p>If a Star Wars spinoff were to have Larson and Moore (BSG writers) and a few of the associate producers from BSG as well, I could see it doing very well.  Of course, all the good writing/production in the world can't overcome bad acting and vice versa, and while many of the actors/actresses in BSG were limited in depth, they were so overshadowed by those like Olmos and McDonnel that it didn't matter much.</p><p>What I see happening instead is a show similar in feel to Stargate Universe, which is a decent show, but feels as if it's been edited for TV and toned down so network TV viewers can feel good watching it.  Which would be very very sad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The most well done sci-fi drama in recent years ( arguably the best drama of last few decades ) is Battlestar Galactica .
BSG got it right becuase they focused on the character development , writing and realism ( accuracy is probably a better term ) rather than focusing on the amount of sci-fi content and adding the rest later on .
Viewers who would cringe to watch anything science fiction related were quickly absorbed into the show in the same way non-sci-fi readers become absorbed in Orson Scott Card 's 'Ender 's Game ' series -- becuase both creations are GOOD , WELL WRITTEN , WELL EXECUTED DRAMA 'S in a science fiction setting .
You could forget about the cylons and the prophecies and all the rest because the drama was excellent and not dependant on any special effects or sci-fi knowledge.If a Star Wars spinoff were to have Larson and Moore ( BSG writers ) and a few of the associate producers from BSG as well , I could see it doing very well .
Of course , all the good writing/production in the world ca n't overcome bad acting and vice versa , and while many of the actors/actresses in BSG were limited in depth , they were so overshadowed by those like Olmos and McDonnel that it did n't matter much.What I see happening instead is a show similar in feel to Stargate Universe , which is a decent show , but feels as if it 's been edited for TV and toned down so network TV viewers can feel good watching it .
Which would be very very sad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The most well done sci-fi drama in recent years (arguably the best drama of last few decades) is Battlestar Galactica.
BSG got it right becuase they focused on the character development, writing and realism (accuracy is probably a better term) rather than focusing on the amount of sci-fi content and adding the rest later on.
Viewers who would cringe to watch anything science fiction related were quickly absorbed into the show in the same way non-sci-fi readers become absorbed in Orson Scott Card's 'Ender's Game' series -- becuase both creations are GOOD, WELL WRITTEN, WELL EXECUTED DRAMA'S in a science fiction setting.
You could forget about the cylons and the prophecies and all the rest because the drama was excellent and not dependant on any special effects or sci-fi knowledge.If a Star Wars spinoff were to have Larson and Moore (BSG writers) and a few of the associate producers from BSG as well, I could see it doing very well.
Of course, all the good writing/production in the world can't overcome bad acting and vice versa, and while many of the actors/actresses in BSG were limited in depth, they were so overshadowed by those like Olmos and McDonnel that it didn't matter much.What I see happening instead is a show similar in feel to Stargate Universe, which is a decent show, but feels as if it's been edited for TV and toned down so network TV viewers can feel good watching it.
Which would be very very sad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100940</id>
	<title>Re:It's far too late...</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1265910180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I watched episode 2 at the theater we affectionately call "The Welfare Flicks", a second run theater. For the third, I just rented the DVD and that was just for closure.</p></div><p>You watched episodes 2 and 3? Why? Didn't episode 1 teach you not to watch any more Star Wars, ever again?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I watched episode 2 at the theater we affectionately call " The Welfare Flicks " , a second run theater .
For the third , I just rented the DVD and that was just for closure.You watched episodes 2 and 3 ?
Why ? Did n't episode 1 teach you not to watch any more Star Wars , ever again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I watched episode 2 at the theater we affectionately call "The Welfare Flicks", a second run theater.
For the third, I just rented the DVD and that was just for closure.You watched episodes 2 and 3?
Why? Didn't episode 1 teach you not to watch any more Star Wars, ever again?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099762</id>
	<title>Re:Latter Canceled. Need New Avenues.</title>
	<author>Sobrique</author>
	<datestamp>1265904780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they did a 3 film set about the Timothy Zahn stuff - they really wouldn't have to change much either, and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... acutally really \_shouldn't\_ change much - then you'd get something really cool. Thrawn was a brilliant character - a very plausible 'bad guy', and the rest of the storyline fit really quite well indeed.
<br>
Actually, yeah. I think I'll go re-read those<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they did a 3 film set about the Timothy Zahn stuff - they really would n't have to change much either , and ... acutally really \ _should n't \ _ change much - then you 'd get something really cool .
Thrawn was a brilliant character - a very plausible 'bad guy ' , and the rest of the storyline fit really quite well indeed .
Actually , yeah .
I think I 'll go re-read those : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they did a 3 film set about the Timothy Zahn stuff - they really wouldn't have to change much either, and ... acutally really \_shouldn't\_ change much - then you'd get something really cool.
Thrawn was a brilliant character - a very plausible 'bad guy', and the rest of the storyline fit really quite well indeed.
Actually, yeah.
I think I'll go re-read those :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31111278</id>
	<title>Re:Humm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265977200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find your lack of faith disturbing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find your lack of faith disturbing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find your lack of faith disturbing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31103698</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265921280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone needs to hook him up with an Oscillation Overthruster, then.</p><p>Buckaroo, where are you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone needs to hook him up with an Oscillation Overthruster , then.Buckaroo , where are you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone needs to hook him up with an Oscillation Overthruster, then.Buckaroo, where are you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31107464</id>
	<title>Re:It's far too late...</title>
	<author>bdh</author>
	<datestamp>1265893080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>the real difference between episodes 4-6 and 1-3 is *you*, not the films.</i></p><p>The real difference between episodes 4-6 and 1-3 is the difference between the 1970s and the 2000s.</p><p>Star Wars existed in a vacuum. Episodes 1-3 were planted in a forest.</p><p>People forget, or don't know, what the movie landscape was like in the mid to late 1970s. If you ever check out movie listings in 1970s newspapers, you'll get an eye full. In post-Watergate America, movies were depressing. Occult movies were all the rage, as were cops-on-the-take pieces. Movies almost uniformly presented a dismal view of the world. Everything was corrupt, evil, or pointless. The number of kid- and family-friendly movies was almost exclusively limited to Disney flicks.</p><p>There were movies for 5-10 year olds, mature movies for 18+ year olds. And porn. Teens had a choice between sneaking into R-rated flicks, or seeing "family fare" aimed at six year olds. I remember one weekend checking the movie listings, and out of something like 25 movies, 20 were R-rated, 4 were kid flicks, and one was a documentary.</p><p>Keep in mind that these were the days before the internet, before cell phones, and before personal computers. Television had three networks: ABC, CBS, and NBC. There were five for us Canadians, we got CBC and CTV too, but mostly they just showed American shows, so it wasn't all that different.</p><p>In other words, Star Wars didn't have a whole lot in the way of competition for people's attention, compared to today.</p><p>Star Wars was the first movie in years which a family could see together without boring the teenagers out of their minds, and without traumatizing the pre-teen set. It was the first movie in something like five years where parents didn't have to cringe going into the theater, and weren't afraid to take their kids to.</p><p>Star Wars was also a throwback to the old Flash Gordon and Buck Rogers serials that many of those parents had back in their own teenage years.</p><p>I think the original Star Wars trilogy was a good, fun, series. I don't think that it deserved the adulation it received. It was a decent film that happened to appear at exactly the perfect time for it to become a phenomenon.</p><p>Star Wars made theatrical movies fun again. It made it okay to make family friendly movies, something that even a year earlier would have been sneered at as unsophisticated.</p><p>So, basically, Star Wars got an unearned reputation as being the second coming of science fiction. People had low expectations, so they were pleasantly surprised by a fun film which, in all honesty, doesn't really stand up to deep inspection.</p><p>Episodes 1-3 were exactly the opposite. People had sky high expectations, and both TV and movie offerings of science fiction had blossomed since the 1970s.</p><p>That having been said, episodes 1-3 also sucked like a Hoover because they failed at storytelling. The original series fails the logic test, too. But it's interesting enough that it distracts most people from noticing that fact until after they leave the theatre. Episodes 1-3 had people physically rolling their eyes and groaning in the theatre.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the real difference between episodes 4-6 and 1-3 is * you * , not the films.The real difference between episodes 4-6 and 1-3 is the difference between the 1970s and the 2000s.Star Wars existed in a vacuum .
Episodes 1-3 were planted in a forest.People forget , or do n't know , what the movie landscape was like in the mid to late 1970s .
If you ever check out movie listings in 1970s newspapers , you 'll get an eye full .
In post-Watergate America , movies were depressing .
Occult movies were all the rage , as were cops-on-the-take pieces .
Movies almost uniformly presented a dismal view of the world .
Everything was corrupt , evil , or pointless .
The number of kid- and family-friendly movies was almost exclusively limited to Disney flicks.There were movies for 5-10 year olds , mature movies for 18 + year olds .
And porn .
Teens had a choice between sneaking into R-rated flicks , or seeing " family fare " aimed at six year olds .
I remember one weekend checking the movie listings , and out of something like 25 movies , 20 were R-rated , 4 were kid flicks , and one was a documentary.Keep in mind that these were the days before the internet , before cell phones , and before personal computers .
Television had three networks : ABC , CBS , and NBC .
There were five for us Canadians , we got CBC and CTV too , but mostly they just showed American shows , so it was n't all that different.In other words , Star Wars did n't have a whole lot in the way of competition for people 's attention , compared to today.Star Wars was the first movie in years which a family could see together without boring the teenagers out of their minds , and without traumatizing the pre-teen set .
It was the first movie in something like five years where parents did n't have to cringe going into the theater , and were n't afraid to take their kids to.Star Wars was also a throwback to the old Flash Gordon and Buck Rogers serials that many of those parents had back in their own teenage years.I think the original Star Wars trilogy was a good , fun , series .
I do n't think that it deserved the adulation it received .
It was a decent film that happened to appear at exactly the perfect time for it to become a phenomenon.Star Wars made theatrical movies fun again .
It made it okay to make family friendly movies , something that even a year earlier would have been sneered at as unsophisticated.So , basically , Star Wars got an unearned reputation as being the second coming of science fiction .
People had low expectations , so they were pleasantly surprised by a fun film which , in all honesty , does n't really stand up to deep inspection.Episodes 1-3 were exactly the opposite .
People had sky high expectations , and both TV and movie offerings of science fiction had blossomed since the 1970s.That having been said , episodes 1-3 also sucked like a Hoover because they failed at storytelling .
The original series fails the logic test , too .
But it 's interesting enough that it distracts most people from noticing that fact until after they leave the theatre .
Episodes 1-3 had people physically rolling their eyes and groaning in the theatre .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the real difference between episodes 4-6 and 1-3 is *you*, not the films.The real difference between episodes 4-6 and 1-3 is the difference between the 1970s and the 2000s.Star Wars existed in a vacuum.
Episodes 1-3 were planted in a forest.People forget, or don't know, what the movie landscape was like in the mid to late 1970s.
If you ever check out movie listings in 1970s newspapers, you'll get an eye full.
In post-Watergate America, movies were depressing.
Occult movies were all the rage, as were cops-on-the-take pieces.
Movies almost uniformly presented a dismal view of the world.
Everything was corrupt, evil, or pointless.
The number of kid- and family-friendly movies was almost exclusively limited to Disney flicks.There were movies for 5-10 year olds, mature movies for 18+ year olds.
And porn.
Teens had a choice between sneaking into R-rated flicks, or seeing "family fare" aimed at six year olds.
I remember one weekend checking the movie listings, and out of something like 25 movies, 20 were R-rated, 4 were kid flicks, and one was a documentary.Keep in mind that these were the days before the internet, before cell phones, and before personal computers.
Television had three networks: ABC, CBS, and NBC.
There were five for us Canadians, we got CBC and CTV too, but mostly they just showed American shows, so it wasn't all that different.In other words, Star Wars didn't have a whole lot in the way of competition for people's attention, compared to today.Star Wars was the first movie in years which a family could see together without boring the teenagers out of their minds, and without traumatizing the pre-teen set.
It was the first movie in something like five years where parents didn't have to cringe going into the theater, and weren't afraid to take their kids to.Star Wars was also a throwback to the old Flash Gordon and Buck Rogers serials that many of those parents had back in their own teenage years.I think the original Star Wars trilogy was a good, fun, series.
I don't think that it deserved the adulation it received.
It was a decent film that happened to appear at exactly the perfect time for it to become a phenomenon.Star Wars made theatrical movies fun again.
It made it okay to make family friendly movies, something that even a year earlier would have been sneered at as unsophisticated.So, basically, Star Wars got an unearned reputation as being the second coming of science fiction.
People had low expectations, so they were pleasantly surprised by a fun film which, in all honesty, doesn't really stand up to deep inspection.Episodes 1-3 were exactly the opposite.
People had sky high expectations, and both TV and movie offerings of science fiction had blossomed since the 1970s.That having been said, episodes 1-3 also sucked like a Hoover because they failed at storytelling.
The original series fails the logic test, too.
But it's interesting enough that it distracts most people from noticing that fact until after they leave the theatre.
Episodes 1-3 had people physically rolling their eyes and groaning in the theatre.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100368</id>
	<title>Re:Latter Canceled. Need New Avenues.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265907420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If copyright lasted 28 years as originally envisioned, multiple follow-on movies would have been made over the past few years.  But I guess If Lucas stopped receiving payment a decade ago, he never would have bothered to make StarWars in the first place.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If copyright lasted 28 years as originally envisioned , multiple follow-on movies would have been made over the past few years .
But I guess If Lucas stopped receiving payment a decade ago , he never would have bothered to make StarWars in the first place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If copyright lasted 28 years as originally envisioned, multiple follow-on movies would have been made over the past few years.
But I guess If Lucas stopped receiving payment a decade ago, he never would have bothered to make StarWars in the first place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099468</id>
	<title>Boba Fett?</title>
	<author>Johnberg</author>
	<datestamp>1265903280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When did he become a major character?  He had, what, 5 lines in all of the movies combined?</htmltext>
<tokenext>When did he become a major character ?
He had , what , 5 lines in all of the movies combined ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When did he become a major character?
He had, what, 5 lines in all of the movies combined?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100184</id>
	<title>Re:It's far too late...</title>
	<author>motorhead</author>
	<datestamp>1265906640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd like to see Farscape come back.</p><p>I'm just saying.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like to see Farscape come back.I 'm just saying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd like to see Farscape come back.I'm just saying.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099442</id>
	<title>Maybe G. could jump on the franchise-reboot train!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265903100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>And they should get David Cronnenberg to direct it! Would be tempting to see how he portraits Yoda... or the Jabba and Leia part..</htmltext>
<tokenext>And they should get David Cronnenberg to direct it !
Would be tempting to see how he portraits Yoda... or the Jabba and Leia part. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And they should get David Cronnenberg to direct it!
Would be tempting to see how he portraits Yoda... or the Jabba and Leia part..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098804</id>
	<title>Much like the Holocaust</title>
	<author>Trinexx</author>
	<datestamp>1265899800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Jar-Jar will never be forgotten.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Jar-Jar will never be forgotten .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jar-Jar will never be forgotten.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099478</id>
	<title>Re:Never mind prequels</title>
	<author>dreamchaser</author>
	<datestamp>1265903340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the post Star Was novels it was revealed that <a href="http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Palpatine" title="wikia.com">Palpatine had clones of himself</a> [wikia.com].  His 'essence' fled Endor and moved into a clone.</p><p>Luke even went over to the Dark Side for a time, but Leia pulled him back and together they defeated Palpatine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the post Star Was novels it was revealed that Palpatine had clones of himself [ wikia.com ] .
His 'essence ' fled Endor and moved into a clone.Luke even went over to the Dark Side for a time , but Leia pulled him back and together they defeated Palpatine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the post Star Was novels it was revealed that Palpatine had clones of himself [wikia.com].
His 'essence' fled Endor and moved into a clone.Luke even went over to the Dark Side for a time, but Leia pulled him back and together they defeated Palpatine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31103280</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>halcyon1234</author>
	<datestamp>1265919720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Also, George plans to hand the reins over to someone else after writing and producing the first season.</p></div> </blockquote><p>He already did that. It was called <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0361243/" title="imdb.com">Star Wars: Clone Wars</a> [imdb.com] (no, not <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1185834/" title="imdb.com">that one</a> [imdb.com]).</p><p>It was absolutely awesome.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , George plans to hand the reins over to someone else after writing and producing the first season .
He already did that .
It was called Star Wars : Clone Wars [ imdb.com ] ( no , not that one [ imdb.com ] ) .It was absolutely awesome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, George plans to hand the reins over to someone else after writing and producing the first season.
He already did that.
It was called Star Wars: Clone Wars [imdb.com] (no, not that one [imdb.com]).It was absolutely awesome.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31102914</id>
	<title>uhmm..</title>
	<author>SuperDre</author>
	<datestamp>1265918460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Can George Lucas' new Star Wars TV series, the first Star Wars spin off with real actors, atone for the flawed follow-ups to his original classics?</i> <br>
<br>
It actually would be the SECOND spin off with real actors..... There were two Ewok movies....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can George Lucas ' new Star Wars TV series , the first Star Wars spin off with real actors , atone for the flawed follow-ups to his original classics ?
It actually would be the SECOND spin off with real actors..... There were two Ewok movies... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can George Lucas' new Star Wars TV series, the first Star Wars spin off with real actors, atone for the flawed follow-ups to his original classics?
It actually would be the SECOND spin off with real actors..... There were two Ewok movies....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790</id>
	<title>OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265899740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hopefully, this show will get it right, and have a little bit of depth to it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully , this show will get it right , and have a little bit of depth to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully, this show will get it right, and have a little bit of depth to it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101698</id>
	<title>Re:It's far too late...</title>
	<author>farble1670</author>
	<datestamp>1265914380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the original star wars movies were extremely cheesy and mark hamill, carrie fisher, et al., were terrible actors. when i watch the original movies i get chills of embarrassment for them. at the time episodes 4-6 were packed with state of the art flashy special effects. as for the story<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... let's see. a moon-size space station that is destroyed from a tiny fighter with a single shot<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and then destroyed again (whoops!). a planet of teddy bears that defeat the hardened imperial stormtroopers?  i can go on.</p><p>the real difference between episodes 4-6 and 1-3 is *you*, not the films. when i saw episodes 4-6 i was a child. when you are a child, you don't tend to get caught up in bad acting and less than stellar plots. your mind is flexible enough to fill in the blanks, skip inconsistencies, and expand on ideas. you just need a theme. now that you are an adult, you want the whole thing laid in front of you perfectly and when you don't get it you whine all over the internet about how mr. lucas committed a crime against nature.</p><p>fine if you don't like episodes 1-3, but don't pretend that 4-6 were any better.</p><p>personally, i liked episodes 4-6. the acting bothered me to some degree. there were some aspects of the story like the anakin-padme love affair, jar-jar,  and the boy anakin parts. i'm willing to get over that and enjoy one of a very few decent sci-fi movies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the original star wars movies were extremely cheesy and mark hamill , carrie fisher , et al. , were terrible actors .
when i watch the original movies i get chills of embarrassment for them .
at the time episodes 4-6 were packed with state of the art flashy special effects .
as for the story ... let 's see .
a moon-size space station that is destroyed from a tiny fighter with a single shot ... and then destroyed again ( whoops ! ) .
a planet of teddy bears that defeat the hardened imperial stormtroopers ?
i can go on.the real difference between episodes 4-6 and 1-3 is * you * , not the films .
when i saw episodes 4-6 i was a child .
when you are a child , you do n't tend to get caught up in bad acting and less than stellar plots .
your mind is flexible enough to fill in the blanks , skip inconsistencies , and expand on ideas .
you just need a theme .
now that you are an adult , you want the whole thing laid in front of you perfectly and when you do n't get it you whine all over the internet about how mr. lucas committed a crime against nature.fine if you do n't like episodes 1-3 , but do n't pretend that 4-6 were any better.personally , i liked episodes 4-6. the acting bothered me to some degree .
there were some aspects of the story like the anakin-padme love affair , jar-jar , and the boy anakin parts .
i 'm willing to get over that and enjoy one of a very few decent sci-fi movies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the original star wars movies were extremely cheesy and mark hamill, carrie fisher, et al., were terrible actors.
when i watch the original movies i get chills of embarrassment for them.
at the time episodes 4-6 were packed with state of the art flashy special effects.
as for the story ... let's see.
a moon-size space station that is destroyed from a tiny fighter with a single shot ... and then destroyed again (whoops!).
a planet of teddy bears that defeat the hardened imperial stormtroopers?
i can go on.the real difference between episodes 4-6 and 1-3 is *you*, not the films.
when i saw episodes 4-6 i was a child.
when you are a child, you don't tend to get caught up in bad acting and less than stellar plots.
your mind is flexible enough to fill in the blanks, skip inconsistencies, and expand on ideas.
you just need a theme.
now that you are an adult, you want the whole thing laid in front of you perfectly and when you don't get it you whine all over the internet about how mr. lucas committed a crime against nature.fine if you don't like episodes 1-3, but don't pretend that 4-6 were any better.personally, i liked episodes 4-6. the acting bothered me to some degree.
there were some aspects of the story like the anakin-padme love affair, jar-jar,  and the boy anakin parts.
i'm willing to get over that and enjoy one of a very few decent sci-fi movies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100148</id>
	<title>Re:"Much darker" my ass</title>
	<author>PawNtheSandman</author>
	<datestamp>1265906520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the last Harry Potter and The Dark Knight were both much darker than their predecessors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the last Harry Potter and The Dark Knight were both much darker than their predecessors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the last Harry Potter and The Dark Knight were both much darker than their predecessors.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099666</id>
	<title>The ESB</title>
	<author>Jinjuku</author>
	<datestamp>1265904360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>If they can keep it in tone, tempo, and temperament of the Empire Strikes Back they will have my vote. Easily the best of the series.</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they can keep it in tone , tempo , and temperament of the Empire Strikes Back they will have my vote .
Easily the best of the series .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they can keep it in tone, tempo, and temperament of the Empire Strikes Back they will have my vote.
Easily the best of the series.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31113684</id>
	<title>Re:"Much darker" my ass</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265993220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nah, darker means less smiles and more torment. Less hope and more suffering.  Evil succeeds more often than good.  A hero's fears and doubts and suffering are more prominent than his strength and good will.</p><p>"Darker" can be empirically tracked and emotionally felt.  If a movie doesn't feel darker despite everyone else saying it is then you're simply desensitized to the suffering and evil dominating the movie.</p><p>Being child suitable is not a measurement for darkness.  If darkness = "suffering, death, corruption, evil, hate, anger, depression" then clearly a movie's darkness determines if it's child suitable.  Not visa versa.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nah , darker means less smiles and more torment .
Less hope and more suffering .
Evil succeeds more often than good .
A hero 's fears and doubts and suffering are more prominent than his strength and good will .
" Darker " can be empirically tracked and emotionally felt .
If a movie does n't feel darker despite everyone else saying it is then you 're simply desensitized to the suffering and evil dominating the movie.Being child suitable is not a measurement for darkness .
If darkness = " suffering , death , corruption , evil , hate , anger , depression " then clearly a movie 's darkness determines if it 's child suitable .
Not visa versa .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nah, darker means less smiles and more torment.
Less hope and more suffering.
Evil succeeds more often than good.
A hero's fears and doubts and suffering are more prominent than his strength and good will.
"Darker" can be empirically tracked and emotionally felt.
If a movie doesn't feel darker despite everyone else saying it is then you're simply desensitized to the suffering and evil dominating the movie.Being child suitable is not a measurement for darkness.
If darkness = "suffering, death, corruption, evil, hate, anger, depression" then clearly a movie's darkness determines if it's child suitable.
Not visa versa.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265901360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Hopefully, this show will get it right, and have a little bit of depth to it.</p></div><p>Well, for starters, it is set in the best possible time frame. Rather than the time of the wooden Jedi Council and the useless Senate holding endless meetings, it's set in the time of the rise of the Rebel Alliance. There's so much potential for a good show in that era.</p><p>Also, George plans to hand the reins over to someone else after writing and producing the first season. So, it might have a slow start, but the possibility of a decent series growing out of it is actually fairly high &mdash; depending, of course, on who takes over in season two.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully , this show will get it right , and have a little bit of depth to it.Well , for starters , it is set in the best possible time frame .
Rather than the time of the wooden Jedi Council and the useless Senate holding endless meetings , it 's set in the time of the rise of the Rebel Alliance .
There 's so much potential for a good show in that era.Also , George plans to hand the reins over to someone else after writing and producing the first season .
So , it might have a slow start , but the possibility of a decent series growing out of it is actually fairly high    depending , of course , on who takes over in season two .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully, this show will get it right, and have a little bit of depth to it.Well, for starters, it is set in the best possible time frame.
Rather than the time of the wooden Jedi Council and the useless Senate holding endless meetings, it's set in the time of the rise of the Rebel Alliance.
There's so much potential for a good show in that era.Also, George plans to hand the reins over to someone else after writing and producing the first season.
So, it might have a slow start, but the possibility of a decent series growing out of it is actually fairly high — depending, of course, on who takes over in season two.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101912</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>Haxzaw</author>
	<datestamp>1265915280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If he's bitter, it is more likely because Carrie Fisher ended up being his sister.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If he 's bitter , it is more likely because Carrie Fisher ended up being his sister .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If he's bitter, it is more likely because Carrie Fisher ended up being his sister.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100348</id>
	<title>Re:It's far too late...</title>
	<author>Zot Quixote</author>
	<datestamp>1265907300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, I'm glad you don't overreact or anything.

If people saw things as they were, we'd get less OMG THIS IS THE BEST THING EVER U MUST MAKE A SEQUEL THERES NO IT CAN SUCK and less OMG THIS IS THE WORST THING EVER I HOPE LUCAS DIES AND HIS CHILDREN AND ALL HIS MIDICHLORIANS

Ouch...I think I hurt my caps lock</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I 'm glad you do n't overreact or anything .
If people saw things as they were , we 'd get less OMG THIS IS THE BEST THING EVER U MUST MAKE A SEQUEL THERES NO IT CAN SUCK and less OMG THIS IS THE WORST THING EVER I HOPE LUCAS DIES AND HIS CHILDREN AND ALL HIS MIDICHLORIANS Ouch...I think I hurt my caps lock</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I'm glad you don't overreact or anything.
If people saw things as they were, we'd get less OMG THIS IS THE BEST THING EVER U MUST MAKE A SEQUEL THERES NO IT CAN SUCK and less OMG THIS IS THE WORST THING EVER I HOPE LUCAS DIES AND HIS CHILDREN AND ALL HIS MIDICHLORIANS

Ouch...I think I hurt my caps lock</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31104800</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Joss Whedon is overrated</title>
	<author>Oldstench</author>
	<datestamp>1265882520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Put a talented writer like Joss Whedon...</p></div><p>Haha.<br>HAHHAHAHahaa.<br>AAAAHAHAHahAHAHHAaha!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Put a talented writer like Joss Whedon...Haha.HAHHAHAHahaa.AAAAHAHAHahAHAHHAaha !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Put a talented writer like Joss Whedon...Haha.HAHHAHAHahaa.AAAAHAHAHahAHAHHAaha!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099420</id>
	<title>Can Lucas erase the memory of JarJar?</title>
	<author>Cro Magnon</author>
	<datestamp>1265902920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Missa no think so!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Missa no think so !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Missa no think so!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100332</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265907240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Weren't Episodes 1-3 also set in a best possible time frame before they saw the light of day?  The only way this could be good would be if it were left to the imagination.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Were n't Episodes 1-3 also set in a best possible time frame before they saw the light of day ?
The only way this could be good would be if it were left to the imagination .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Weren't Episodes 1-3 also set in a best possible time frame before they saw the light of day?
The only way this could be good would be if it were left to the imagination.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31108634</id>
	<title>Re:Never mind prequels</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265900760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like it's time for a Start Wars Crisis series.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like it 's time for a Start Wars Crisis series .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like it's time for a Start Wars Crisis series.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101480</id>
	<title>jellybabies?</title>
	<author>Turbo\_Button</author>
	<datestamp>1265913120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He should have a jedi that uses the force to time travel, possibly in some sort of box that's larger on the inside than on the outside, and have them fight monsters that look like salt and pepper shakers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He should have a jedi that uses the force to time travel , possibly in some sort of box that 's larger on the inside than on the outside , and have them fight monsters that look like salt and pepper shakers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He should have a jedi that uses the force to time travel, possibly in some sort of box that's larger on the inside than on the outside, and have them fight monsters that look like salt and pepper shakers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099252</id>
	<title>Re:"Much darker" my ass</title>
	<author>jzarling</author>
	<datestamp>1265902140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Much Darker" just means more poorly lit sets.<br> <br>
Gritty means there will be rain, garbage strewn about, and major set pieces will be taking place in either abandoned industrial complexes, or abandoned buildings.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Much Darker " just means more poorly lit sets .
Gritty means there will be rain , garbage strewn about , and major set pieces will be taking place in either abandoned industrial complexes , or abandoned buildings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Much Darker" just means more poorly lit sets.
Gritty means there will be rain, garbage strewn about, and major set pieces will be taking place in either abandoned industrial complexes, or abandoned buildings.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100540</id>
	<title>Episode Idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265908140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just want an episode where they show the planning for building the Death Star.</p><p>"So we'll have a completely open tube leading from the outside straight to the extremely unstable reactor core."<br>"If someone could get a bomb down the tube it could destroy the entire station?"<br>"Right, but that'll never happen.  In fact I'm so sure I won't even design a grate for the opening or even put a bend in it."<br>"You sir, have a gift!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just want an episode where they show the planning for building the Death Star .
" So we 'll have a completely open tube leading from the outside straight to the extremely unstable reactor core .
" " If someone could get a bomb down the tube it could destroy the entire station ?
" " Right , but that 'll never happen .
In fact I 'm so sure I wo n't even design a grate for the opening or even put a bend in it .
" " You sir , have a gift !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just want an episode where they show the planning for building the Death Star.
"So we'll have a completely open tube leading from the outside straight to the extremely unstable reactor core.
""If someone could get a bomb down the tube it could destroy the entire station?
""Right, but that'll never happen.
In fact I'm so sure I won't even design a grate for the opening or even put a bend in it.
""You sir, have a gift!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101118</id>
	<title>Re:It's far too late...</title>
	<author>buswolley</author>
	<datestamp>1265911320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sorry. My kids, AND THE WHOLE neighborhood of kids obsesses over Starwars. Obsessed. The streets are littered with oft-played-with plastic light-sabers. The Clone Wars TV series is a huge hit. They think the movies are fine too. If I hear the kids ask me another question about who can beat who, I'll go nuts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry .
My kids , AND THE WHOLE neighborhood of kids obsesses over Starwars .
Obsessed. The streets are littered with oft-played-with plastic light-sabers .
The Clone Wars TV series is a huge hit .
They think the movies are fine too .
If I hear the kids ask me another question about who can beat who , I 'll go nuts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry.
My kids, AND THE WHOLE neighborhood of kids obsesses over Starwars.
Obsessed. The streets are littered with oft-played-with plastic light-sabers.
The Clone Wars TV series is a huge hit.
They think the movies are fine too.
If I hear the kids ask me another question about who can beat who, I'll go nuts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099070</id>
	<title>"Much darker" my ass</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1265901060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These days "Much darker than its predecessor" has become Hollywood doublespeak. It means nothing. "This Harry Potter movie will be much darker than the last one" is just the studio's way of trying to get more adults to come see it (at the end of the day, it still ends up being the same PG-13 rated CGI-fest).</p><p>Here's a good rule of thumb, if they have to *say* it's much darker, it probably isn't. If you want to see if it's just doublespeak, ask the simple follow-up question "But it's still suitable for kids, right?" If they fall over themselves saying yes, then you know the "much darker" thing is just a con.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These days " Much darker than its predecessor " has become Hollywood doublespeak .
It means nothing .
" This Harry Potter movie will be much darker than the last one " is just the studio 's way of trying to get more adults to come see it ( at the end of the day , it still ends up being the same PG-13 rated CGI-fest ) .Here 's a good rule of thumb , if they have to * say * it 's much darker , it probably is n't .
If you want to see if it 's just doublespeak , ask the simple follow-up question " But it 's still suitable for kids , right ?
" If they fall over themselves saying yes , then you know the " much darker " thing is just a con .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These days "Much darker than its predecessor" has become Hollywood doublespeak.
It means nothing.
"This Harry Potter movie will be much darker than the last one" is just the studio's way of trying to get more adults to come see it (at the end of the day, it still ends up being the same PG-13 rated CGI-fest).Here's a good rule of thumb, if they have to *say* it's much darker, it probably isn't.
If you want to see if it's just doublespeak, ask the simple follow-up question "But it's still suitable for kids, right?
" If they fall over themselves saying yes, then you know the "much darker" thing is just a con.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31105146</id>
	<title>Re:Never mind prequels</title>
	<author>IorDMUX</author>
	<datestamp>1265883780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>over the Star Wars Universe since he single-handedly founded it in 1990</p></div><p>Oops... I lost a word, there:  It should be "the Star Wars <i>Literature</i> Universe", which had its modern origins in Zahn's novels.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>over the Star Wars Universe since he single-handedly founded it in 1990Oops... I lost a word , there : It should be " the Star Wars Literature Universe " , which had its modern origins in Zahn 's novels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>over the Star Wars Universe since he single-handedly founded it in 1990Oops... I lost a word, there:  It should be "the Star Wars Literature Universe", which had its modern origins in Zahn's novels.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100442</id>
	<title>Not another dark scifi....</title>
	<author>hort\_wort</author>
	<datestamp>1265907720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"It's a much darker, much more character-based series, much more adult, and we're hoping that it will go on for up to 400 episodes," he said.</p></div><p>Is it just me, or does every new dark scifi show just look like another Battlestar Galactica ripoff?  I (and I realize I'm in the minority) was extremely disappointed with Stargate Universe when it was obvious trying to just redo BSG.  I got enough of that perpetually poorly lit episode of Jerry Springer after the first hour. <br> <br>

*Please* scifi writers, go back to the humorous fun of Firefly and original Stargate SG-1.  Stop with the dark stuff.  Star Trek Enterprise flopped amazingly fast because it was trying to be dark.  I thought after seeing an amazing title like Star Trek go down so fast, people would get the hint that dark scifi isn't good.  Sure, BSG was successful.  Do you know why I watched it?  It was because <i>it was the only thing around</i>.  Dark scifi is like the lone ugly hooker across the street.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" It 's a much darker , much more character-based series , much more adult , and we 're hoping that it will go on for up to 400 episodes , " he said.Is it just me , or does every new dark scifi show just look like another Battlestar Galactica ripoff ?
I ( and I realize I 'm in the minority ) was extremely disappointed with Stargate Universe when it was obvious trying to just redo BSG .
I got enough of that perpetually poorly lit episode of Jerry Springer after the first hour .
* Please * scifi writers , go back to the humorous fun of Firefly and original Stargate SG-1 .
Stop with the dark stuff .
Star Trek Enterprise flopped amazingly fast because it was trying to be dark .
I thought after seeing an amazing title like Star Trek go down so fast , people would get the hint that dark scifi is n't good .
Sure , BSG was successful .
Do you know why I watched it ?
It was because it was the only thing around .
Dark scifi is like the lone ugly hooker across the street .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It's a much darker, much more character-based series, much more adult, and we're hoping that it will go on for up to 400 episodes," he said.Is it just me, or does every new dark scifi show just look like another Battlestar Galactica ripoff?
I (and I realize I'm in the minority) was extremely disappointed with Stargate Universe when it was obvious trying to just redo BSG.
I got enough of that perpetually poorly lit episode of Jerry Springer after the first hour.
*Please* scifi writers, go back to the humorous fun of Firefly and original Stargate SG-1.
Stop with the dark stuff.
Star Trek Enterprise flopped amazingly fast because it was trying to be dark.
I thought after seeing an amazing title like Star Trek go down so fast, people would get the hint that dark scifi isn't good.
Sure, BSG was successful.
Do you know why I watched it?
It was because it was the only thing around.
Dark scifi is like the lone ugly hooker across the street.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31109940</id>
	<title>To all the prequel haters:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265914680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shut up nerds.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Shut up nerds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shut up nerds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100550</id>
	<title>Re:Euwww</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265908140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This made me laugh out loud.  Thank you!  Oh and George Lucas........drop dead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This made me laugh out loud .
Thank you !
Oh and George Lucas........drop dead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This made me laugh out loud.
Thank you!
Oh and George Lucas........drop dead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099262</id>
	<title>Re:"Much darker" my ass</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265902140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To be fair, the potter movies, just like the books, do get darker as the series progresses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair , the potter movies , just like the books , do get darker as the series progresses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair, the potter movies, just like the books, do get darker as the series progresses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100914</id>
	<title>Where?</title>
	<author>Wyatt Earp</author>
	<datestamp>1265910060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In that article, I couldn't find any information on what network it will be on in the US. Is it going to be syndicated?</p><p>And its not going to be out till 2011 or 2012, so why are we talking about it before it's been cast?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In that article , I could n't find any information on what network it will be on in the US .
Is it going to be syndicated ? And its not going to be out till 2011 or 2012 , so why are we talking about it before it 's been cast ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In that article, I couldn't find any information on what network it will be on in the US.
Is it going to be syndicated?And its not going to be out till 2011 or 2012, so why are we talking about it before it's been cast?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099126</id>
	<title>more than just three characters</title>
	<author>iggymanz</author>
	<datestamp>1265901360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>star wars horse has been beaten to death, skinned, gutted, bones and hooves boiled to glue.  Then Lucas squatted over the offal and took a shit lasting for years.  Time to forget the whole damn  thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>star wars horse has been beaten to death , skinned , gutted , bones and hooves boiled to glue .
Then Lucas squatted over the offal and took a shit lasting for years .
Time to forget the whole damn thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>star wars horse has been beaten to death, skinned, gutted, bones and hooves boiled to glue.
Then Lucas squatted over the offal and took a shit lasting for years.
Time to forget the whole damn  thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101196</id>
	<title>Re:snap poll</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265911680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British\_space\_programme#British\_astronauts" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">[hand up]</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>[ hand up ] [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[hand up] [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099202</id>
	<title>REAL ACTORS!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265901840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Can George Lucas' new Star Wars TV series, the first Star Wars spin off with real actors"

It would be the first time real actors were used in the entire Star Wars Saga.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Can George Lucas ' new Star Wars TV series , the first Star Wars spin off with real actors " It would be the first time real actors were used in the entire Star Wars Saga .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Can George Lucas' new Star Wars TV series, the first Star Wars spin off with real actors"

It would be the first time real actors were used in the entire Star Wars Saga.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098814</id>
	<title>Frist Post</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265899800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Star Wars franchise like Star Trek is beginning to feel a little worn out.  Time to try something new.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Star Wars franchise like Star Trek is beginning to feel a little worn out .
Time to try something new .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Star Wars franchise like Star Trek is beginning to feel a little worn out.
Time to try something new.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099286</id>
	<title>Re:Latter Canceled. Need New Avenues.</title>
	<author>TiberiusMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1265902320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think I must be about the only person in the world that detested most of the early Extended Universe (Zahn included) stuff as much as he detested the prequels that followed some years later.

No idea what the later stuff was like as I never bothered with it, Han Solo calling someone a "panty waste" and lame story after story was just too much for me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think I must be about the only person in the world that detested most of the early Extended Universe ( Zahn included ) stuff as much as he detested the prequels that followed some years later .
No idea what the later stuff was like as I never bothered with it , Han Solo calling someone a " panty waste " and lame story after story was just too much for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think I must be about the only person in the world that detested most of the early Extended Universe (Zahn included) stuff as much as he detested the prequels that followed some years later.
No idea what the later stuff was like as I never bothered with it, Han Solo calling someone a "panty waste" and lame story after story was just too much for me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099272</id>
	<title>JARJAR's happy fun adventures of whimsy!!!</title>
	<author>happy\_place</author>
	<datestamp>1265902200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Darn, and I was hoping for something along the lines of Peewee Herman's BigTop adventures, with Jarjar the main character, constantly breaking the third wall to talk to a juvenile audience about toy endorsements, "Can yousa kids say to Mommy, "Meesaw want Jarjar action figures!" "</htmltext>
<tokenext>Darn , and I was hoping for something along the lines of Peewee Herman 's BigTop adventures , with Jarjar the main character , constantly breaking the third wall to talk to a juvenile audience about toy endorsements , " Can yousa kids say to Mommy , " Meesaw want Jarjar action figures !
" "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Darn, and I was hoping for something along the lines of Peewee Herman's BigTop adventures, with Jarjar the main character, constantly breaking the third wall to talk to a juvenile audience about toy endorsements, "Can yousa kids say to Mommy, "Meesaw want Jarjar action figures!
" "</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31102742</id>
	<title>Re:Give us a new story!</title>
	<author>mqduck</author>
	<datestamp>1265917920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>whatever they do on Tatooine for entertainment</p></div><p>Shoot womp rats? Jesus, I'm not even a big fan of the movies and I knew that.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>whatever they do on Tatooine for entertainmentShoot womp rats ?
Jesus , I 'm not even a big fan of the movies and I knew that .
: -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>whatever they do on Tatooine for entertainmentShoot womp rats?
Jesus, I'm not even a big fan of the movies and I knew that.
:-P
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099462</id>
	<title>Re:Hey, Polyanna</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1265903220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Anakin and Padme's romance</p></div><p>To do that, wouldn&rsquo;t he have to kill off Luke and Leia?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anakin and Padme 's romanceTo do that , wouldn    t he have to kill off Luke and Leia ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anakin and Padme's romanceTo do that, wouldn’t he have to kill off Luke and Leia?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100478</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>altoz</author>
	<datestamp>1265907780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Well, for starters, it is set in the best possible time frame...</p></div><p>Are you kidding me?  The prequels had so much potential, a great subtext for plots and whatnot.  Think about it.  The reason Lucas made the films in the first place is because everyone was curious about how Darth Vader became Darth Vader.  If that's not a good setup to a story, I don't know what is.  The corruption of Anakin Skywalker is an amazing setup for a good story.  Instead, it was Lucas that bogged down the prequels with useless CG, pointless Senate meetings and a Jedi Council that really wasn't anything more than a showcase for Yoda.  Lucas was the one that felt the need to recycle every character from the first films.</p><p>Put a talented writer like Joss Whedon on a project with such clear boundaries and he would have made an amazing film. We could have seen the slow moral corruption of an innocent Jedi.  The seduction to the dark side by the emperor.  A realistic romance between Anakin and Padme.  Several brand new characters that would have depth to them and interesting plot twists could have been made all around.  Instead we got a train wreck full of discombobulated stories about characters that no one finds interesting.  In short, the story was set up well by episodes 4-6.  Lucas just blew every advantage he had in Episode 1.  He had three fat pitches down the middle and he swung and missed every one.</p><p>Compare that to the setup for this series.  You have an already evil Darth Vader hunting down Jedi.  Somehow, the emperor is going to show his evilness to the world such that rebels will start rising up.  You think senate hearings are boring?  How else are you going to show any protest by rebelling planets? Remember that the emperor doesn't dissolve the senate until ep. 4.  What about action?  The Jedi are mostly already dead. Yoda and Obiwan are supposed to be hiding.  What can you anchor the story around?  Some Jedi that's running away?  A planet that keeps getting oppressed (how exactly?  through trade embargos)?  It's not obvious and not easy to tell a good story in such a setting.  This is like a slider away that you have to hit.  A single is possible.  A strike is more likely.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , for starters , it is set in the best possible time frame...Are you kidding me ?
The prequels had so much potential , a great subtext for plots and whatnot .
Think about it .
The reason Lucas made the films in the first place is because everyone was curious about how Darth Vader became Darth Vader .
If that 's not a good setup to a story , I do n't know what is .
The corruption of Anakin Skywalker is an amazing setup for a good story .
Instead , it was Lucas that bogged down the prequels with useless CG , pointless Senate meetings and a Jedi Council that really was n't anything more than a showcase for Yoda .
Lucas was the one that felt the need to recycle every character from the first films.Put a talented writer like Joss Whedon on a project with such clear boundaries and he would have made an amazing film .
We could have seen the slow moral corruption of an innocent Jedi .
The seduction to the dark side by the emperor .
A realistic romance between Anakin and Padme .
Several brand new characters that would have depth to them and interesting plot twists could have been made all around .
Instead we got a train wreck full of discombobulated stories about characters that no one finds interesting .
In short , the story was set up well by episodes 4-6 .
Lucas just blew every advantage he had in Episode 1 .
He had three fat pitches down the middle and he swung and missed every one.Compare that to the setup for this series .
You have an already evil Darth Vader hunting down Jedi .
Somehow , the emperor is going to show his evilness to the world such that rebels will start rising up .
You think senate hearings are boring ?
How else are you going to show any protest by rebelling planets ?
Remember that the emperor does n't dissolve the senate until ep .
4. What about action ?
The Jedi are mostly already dead .
Yoda and Obiwan are supposed to be hiding .
What can you anchor the story around ?
Some Jedi that 's running away ?
A planet that keeps getting oppressed ( how exactly ?
through trade embargos ) ?
It 's not obvious and not easy to tell a good story in such a setting .
This is like a slider away that you have to hit .
A single is possible .
A strike is more likely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, for starters, it is set in the best possible time frame...Are you kidding me?
The prequels had so much potential, a great subtext for plots and whatnot.
Think about it.
The reason Lucas made the films in the first place is because everyone was curious about how Darth Vader became Darth Vader.
If that's not a good setup to a story, I don't know what is.
The corruption of Anakin Skywalker is an amazing setup for a good story.
Instead, it was Lucas that bogged down the prequels with useless CG, pointless Senate meetings and a Jedi Council that really wasn't anything more than a showcase for Yoda.
Lucas was the one that felt the need to recycle every character from the first films.Put a talented writer like Joss Whedon on a project with such clear boundaries and he would have made an amazing film.
We could have seen the slow moral corruption of an innocent Jedi.
The seduction to the dark side by the emperor.
A realistic romance between Anakin and Padme.
Several brand new characters that would have depth to them and interesting plot twists could have been made all around.
Instead we got a train wreck full of discombobulated stories about characters that no one finds interesting.
In short, the story was set up well by episodes 4-6.
Lucas just blew every advantage he had in Episode 1.
He had three fat pitches down the middle and he swung and missed every one.Compare that to the setup for this series.
You have an already evil Darth Vader hunting down Jedi.
Somehow, the emperor is going to show his evilness to the world such that rebels will start rising up.
You think senate hearings are boring?
How else are you going to show any protest by rebelling planets?
Remember that the emperor doesn't dissolve the senate until ep.
4.  What about action?
The Jedi are mostly already dead.
Yoda and Obiwan are supposed to be hiding.
What can you anchor the story around?
Some Jedi that's running away?
A planet that keeps getting oppressed (how exactly?
through trade embargos)?
It's not obvious and not easy to tell a good story in such a setting.
This is like a slider away that you have to hit.
A single is possible.
A strike is more likely.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838</id>
	<title>Never mind prequels</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265899980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We want sequels to Return of the Jedi. Wasn't he originally going to do 3 sets of trilogies: with the 3rd set later on, and the only common characters would be the 2 droids?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We want sequels to Return of the Jedi .
Was n't he originally going to do 3 sets of trilogies : with the 3rd set later on , and the only common characters would be the 2 droids ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We want sequels to Return of the Jedi.
Wasn't he originally going to do 3 sets of trilogies: with the 3rd set later on, and the only common characters would be the 2 droids?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099908</id>
	<title>king troll</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265905380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jar Jar was the product of people wanting to sound savy and smart in the ticket lines that carried over to the rest of the series. I remember going to the first showing of episode 1 and people complaining about jar jar without even have seeing the movie yet. He's not even that big of a distraction. And the love story in ep 2 is great, the prequels are awesome and I don't understand how people can dislike them so much. I can only rationalize that some people are more influenced by the internet and hear say then what they actually crave and like about in life.</p><p>So it's bad for Lucas to want to push the envelope in CGI but it's all fanfare for James Cameron's Avatar? Internet swarms infecting blank minds and forming opinions for you hurray. Haters gonna hate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jar Jar was the product of people wanting to sound savy and smart in the ticket lines that carried over to the rest of the series .
I remember going to the first showing of episode 1 and people complaining about jar jar without even have seeing the movie yet .
He 's not even that big of a distraction .
And the love story in ep 2 is great , the prequels are awesome and I do n't understand how people can dislike them so much .
I can only rationalize that some people are more influenced by the internet and hear say then what they actually crave and like about in life.So it 's bad for Lucas to want to push the envelope in CGI but it 's all fanfare for James Cameron 's Avatar ?
Internet swarms infecting blank minds and forming opinions for you hurray .
Haters gon na hate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jar Jar was the product of people wanting to sound savy and smart in the ticket lines that carried over to the rest of the series.
I remember going to the first showing of episode 1 and people complaining about jar jar without even have seeing the movie yet.
He's not even that big of a distraction.
And the love story in ep 2 is great, the prequels are awesome and I don't understand how people can dislike them so much.
I can only rationalize that some people are more influenced by the internet and hear say then what they actually crave and like about in life.So it's bad for Lucas to want to push the envelope in CGI but it's all fanfare for James Cameron's Avatar?
Internet swarms infecting blank minds and forming opinions for you hurray.
Haters gonna hate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099414</id>
	<title>Didn't Jar Jar become a senator?</title>
	<author>Mr. Ascii</author>
	<datestamp>1265902920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"when most of the Jedi and anti-emperor politicians were hunted down and killed."</i></p><p>You know what to do George.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" when most of the Jedi and anti-emperor politicians were hunted down and killed .
" You know what to do George .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"when most of the Jedi and anti-emperor politicians were hunted down and killed.
"You know what to do George.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100290</id>
	<title>More of this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265907060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I do not like the whole thing and I will not expend any time (only this 25 seconds to say: lucas retire now, avoid more idiotic shows)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do not like the whole thing and I will not expend any time ( only this 25 seconds to say : lucas retire now , avoid more idiotic shows )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do not like the whole thing and I will not expend any time (only this 25 seconds to say: lucas retire now, avoid more idiotic shows)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099328</id>
	<title>I actually liked Episode 1-3</title>
	<author>f0rk</author>
	<datestamp>1265902440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I actually liked Episode 1-3. No trolling. I did !<br>I liked the new style, even tho it's not "Star Wars", but i still liked it.<br>He painted an epic world with an infinite amount of possible side stories and spin-offs.</p><p>He described a world more then actual characters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I actually liked Episode 1-3 .
No trolling .
I did ! I liked the new style , even tho it 's not " Star Wars " , but i still liked it.He painted an epic world with an infinite amount of possible side stories and spin-offs.He described a world more then actual characters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I actually liked Episode 1-3.
No trolling.
I did !I liked the new style, even tho it's not "Star Wars", but i still liked it.He painted an epic world with an infinite amount of possible side stories and spin-offs.He described a world more then actual characters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31108686</id>
	<title>Re:OMG, Luke Skywalker is right!</title>
	<author>Clemsonuee</author>
	<datestamp>1265901240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A baseball reference on Slashdot?

You must be new here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A baseball reference on Slashdot ?
You must be new here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A baseball reference on Slashdot?
You must be new here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31103790</id>
	<title>Re:It's far too late...</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1265921640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I was a huge fan of Star Wars until the abomination that was episode 1. I watched episode 2 at the theater we affectionately call "The Welfare Flicks", a second run theater. For the third, I just rented the DVD and that was just for closure. Now, I have no more interest in Star Wars. He f*cked up the originals, and I just don't even care anymore if he ever releases a decent DVD of the originals.</p></div><p>I still like the originals. I don't want to see the CGI-sharted touchups, give me the originals. Haven't had the urge to watch them again but I'll download them when I do. He's not getting another fucking dime. But the expanded universe stuff, the video games? Oh, god, it's so much artless shit. I read up on that new legacy of the force series they did with luke's great great godson or whoever, Wankstain Skywalker I think they called him. All darker and edgier like Rob Liefeld came up with him.</p><p>Used to be a Trek fan but they ran that one into the ground so hard it's actually ruined my enjoyment of the better shows. I can't even manage to enjoy TNG because I can't get the taste of Voyager out of my mouth.</p><p>Whoever said it above said it right -- Lucas should have found himself a 20-something wunderkind from the current generation of directors and handed artistic control over to him while staying a producer. He could have still retained the title of brilliant this and that while getting good art created in his name. There's plenty of interesting pathos in showing how a republic fell, how a vader was made. Still not a fan of flashback movies but I am a fan of showing how something you cannot accept comes to be. Even the villain is the hero of his own story as they say. Can he convince you of the injustice of his position, the necessity for his revenge? And how exactly could a good man fall into such darkness yet still have it be said of him that there is good inside? But that story will never be told now.</p><p>I fully equate the Star Wars prequels with the Matrix sequels. It's hard to find anyone who can appreciate the Matrix these days without wincing and saying "Yeah, if only you can ignore the sequels."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was a huge fan of Star Wars until the abomination that was episode 1 .
I watched episode 2 at the theater we affectionately call " The Welfare Flicks " , a second run theater .
For the third , I just rented the DVD and that was just for closure .
Now , I have no more interest in Star Wars .
He f * cked up the originals , and I just do n't even care anymore if he ever releases a decent DVD of the originals.I still like the originals .
I do n't want to see the CGI-sharted touchups , give me the originals .
Have n't had the urge to watch them again but I 'll download them when I do .
He 's not getting another fucking dime .
But the expanded universe stuff , the video games ?
Oh , god , it 's so much artless shit .
I read up on that new legacy of the force series they did with luke 's great great godson or whoever , Wankstain Skywalker I think they called him .
All darker and edgier like Rob Liefeld came up with him.Used to be a Trek fan but they ran that one into the ground so hard it 's actually ruined my enjoyment of the better shows .
I ca n't even manage to enjoy TNG because I ca n't get the taste of Voyager out of my mouth.Whoever said it above said it right -- Lucas should have found himself a 20-something wunderkind from the current generation of directors and handed artistic control over to him while staying a producer .
He could have still retained the title of brilliant this and that while getting good art created in his name .
There 's plenty of interesting pathos in showing how a republic fell , how a vader was made .
Still not a fan of flashback movies but I am a fan of showing how something you can not accept comes to be .
Even the villain is the hero of his own story as they say .
Can he convince you of the injustice of his position , the necessity for his revenge ?
And how exactly could a good man fall into such darkness yet still have it be said of him that there is good inside ?
But that story will never be told now.I fully equate the Star Wars prequels with the Matrix sequels .
It 's hard to find anyone who can appreciate the Matrix these days without wincing and saying " Yeah , if only you can ignore the sequels .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was a huge fan of Star Wars until the abomination that was episode 1.
I watched episode 2 at the theater we affectionately call "The Welfare Flicks", a second run theater.
For the third, I just rented the DVD and that was just for closure.
Now, I have no more interest in Star Wars.
He f*cked up the originals, and I just don't even care anymore if he ever releases a decent DVD of the originals.I still like the originals.
I don't want to see the CGI-sharted touchups, give me the originals.
Haven't had the urge to watch them again but I'll download them when I do.
He's not getting another fucking dime.
But the expanded universe stuff, the video games?
Oh, god, it's so much artless shit.
I read up on that new legacy of the force series they did with luke's great great godson or whoever, Wankstain Skywalker I think they called him.
All darker and edgier like Rob Liefeld came up with him.Used to be a Trek fan but they ran that one into the ground so hard it's actually ruined my enjoyment of the better shows.
I can't even manage to enjoy TNG because I can't get the taste of Voyager out of my mouth.Whoever said it above said it right -- Lucas should have found himself a 20-something wunderkind from the current generation of directors and handed artistic control over to him while staying a producer.
He could have still retained the title of brilliant this and that while getting good art created in his name.
There's plenty of interesting pathos in showing how a republic fell, how a vader was made.
Still not a fan of flashback movies but I am a fan of showing how something you cannot accept comes to be.
Even the villain is the hero of his own story as they say.
Can he convince you of the injustice of his position, the necessity for his revenge?
And how exactly could a good man fall into such darkness yet still have it be said of him that there is good inside?
But that story will never be told now.I fully equate the Star Wars prequels with the Matrix sequels.
It's hard to find anyone who can appreciate the Matrix these days without wincing and saying "Yeah, if only you can ignore the sequels.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099396</id>
	<title>Re:Never mind prequels</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1265902860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The bad guy *always* has a way to survive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The bad guy * always * has a way to survive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The bad guy *always* has a way to survive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099042</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31102718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31102742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31107808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31104204
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31102544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31113702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31107268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31103496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31103698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31105146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31108686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31102534
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31103280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31103790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31110816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31105064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31111278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31107464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31103356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31103784
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31104800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31109740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31105642
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31150090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31113684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31104506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31102702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099506
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31108634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31109636
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099354
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1257246_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100550
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099178
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31102534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31104204
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31102742
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099914
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099190
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100804
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099882
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098838
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101386
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31105146
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31103356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099042
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099396
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099478
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31108634
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100934
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31104506
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31150090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099094
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100368
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099762
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099286
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099586
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100540
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31103784
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31113702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099462
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31111278
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101196
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099132
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100868
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100332
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099710
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100492
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100412
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100866
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31103280
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100670
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099626
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31103698
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100478
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31107808
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31104800
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31105642
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31109636
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31108686
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31103496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099534
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100904
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100348
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31102544
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101698
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31107464
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31107268
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31110816
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31105064
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100834
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100184
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101118
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31102718
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31103790
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100940
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099400
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31102702
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098804
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098816
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099468
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100442
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100530
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099946
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099070
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100148
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099262
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099252
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100896
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31101218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31100962
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31113684
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31109740
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31099344
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1257246.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1257246.31098840
</commentlist>
</conversation>
