<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_10_2347257</id>
	<title>Subversive Groups Must Now Register In South Carolina</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1265806620000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hughpickens.com/" rel="nofollow">Hugh Pickens</a> writes <i>"The Raw Story reports that terrorists who want to overthrow the United States government must now <a href="http://rawstory.com/2010/02/south-carolinas-subversive-activities-registration-act-force/">register with South Carolina's Secretary of State and declare their intentions</a> &mdash; or face a $25,000 fine and up to 10 years in prison.  The 'Subversive Activities Registration Act' <a href="http://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t23c029.htm">passed last year in South Carolina and now officially on the books</a> states that  'every member of a subversive organization, or an organization subject to foreign control, every foreign agent and every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States ... shall register with the Secretary of State.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hugh Pickens writes " The Raw Story reports that terrorists who want to overthrow the United States government must now register with South Carolina 's Secretary of State and declare their intentions    or face a $ 25,000 fine and up to 10 years in prison .
The 'Subversive Activities Registration Act ' passed last year in South Carolina and now officially on the books states that 'every member of a subversive organization , or an organization subject to foreign control , every foreign agent and every person who advocates , teaches , advises or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States ... shall register with the Secretary of State .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hugh Pickens writes "The Raw Story reports that terrorists who want to overthrow the United States government must now register with South Carolina's Secretary of State and declare their intentions — or face a $25,000 fine and up to 10 years in prison.
The 'Subversive Activities Registration Act' passed last year in South Carolina and now officially on the books states that  'every member of a subversive organization, or an organization subject to foreign control, every foreign agent and every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States ... shall register with the Secretary of State.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097366</id>
	<title>The list is long.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265884320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <b>Title of organization:</b> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wasp\_(novel)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Dirac Angestun Gesept</a> [wikipedia.org].<br>
<b>Purpose of organization:</b> Destruction of present government and termination of War Against Terror.<br>
<b>Customary meeting place:</b> Wherever the remnants of the Bush administration can't find us.<br>
<b>Names and address of elected officers:</b> You'll find out when it's too late.<br>
<b>Attach hereto complete list of members:</b> Nah.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Title of organization : Dirac Angestun Gesept [ wikipedia.org ] .
Purpose of organization : Destruction of present government and termination of War Against Terror .
Customary meeting place : Wherever the remnants of the Bush administration ca n't find us .
Names and address of elected officers : You 'll find out when it 's too late .
Attach hereto complete list of members : Nah .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Title of organization: Dirac Angestun Gesept [wikipedia.org].
Purpose of organization: Destruction of present government and termination of War Against Terror.
Customary meeting place: Wherever the remnants of the Bush administration can't find us.
Names and address of elected officers: You'll find out when it's too late.
Attach hereto complete list of members: Nah.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31106444</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265888760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Limit the number of laws.  Pols feel they are working when they pass laws.  They are doing their job.  Make their job choosing the 100 laws that we should have,  should something new pop up, dump a old law and pass a new one.  By limiting the number of laws  everyones freedom will be more secure.  Really, how many laws do we need?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Limit the number of laws .
Pols feel they are working when they pass laws .
They are doing their job .
Make their job choosing the 100 laws that we should have , should something new pop up , dump a old law and pass a new one .
By limiting the number of laws everyones freedom will be more secure .
Really , how many laws do we need ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Limit the number of laws.
Pols feel they are working when they pass laws.
They are doing their job.
Make their job choosing the 100 laws that we should have,  should something new pop up, dump a old law and pass a new one.
By limiting the number of laws  everyones freedom will be more secure.
Really, how many laws do we need?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099718</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>nomadic</author>
	<datestamp>1265904600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>This new law tries to address violent over throw of government.</i>
<br>
<br>
Nah, it's probably just a way to allow some South Carolina right-wing types go after ACORN or the ACLU or whatever other organization their little right-wing brains think is a commie pinko enemy of America.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This new law tries to address violent over throw of government .
Nah , it 's probably just a way to allow some South Carolina right-wing types go after ACORN or the ACLU or whatever other organization their little right-wing brains think is a commie pinko enemy of America .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This new law tries to address violent over throw of government.
Nah, it's probably just a way to allow some South Carolina right-wing types go after ACORN or the ACLU or whatever other organization their little right-wing brains think is a commie pinko enemy of America.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094810</id>
	<title>The feds beat SC to it a long time ago.....</title>
	<author>ogdenk</author>
	<datestamp>1265038920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The feds beat them to it a long time ago..... but they will probably just throw you in prison for 20 years.  Amazing that I can be jailed for this longer than I can be jailed for attempted murder.  Just for ADVOCATING revolution.  This is disgusting.  I feel a storm brewing.</p><p>TITLE 18 &gt; PART I &gt; CHAPTER 115 &gt;  2385</p><p>
&nbsp; 2385. Advocating overthrow of Government</p><p>Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or<br>Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or<br>Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof&mdash;<br>Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The feds beat them to it a long time ago..... but they will probably just throw you in prison for 20 years .
Amazing that I can be jailed for this longer than I can be jailed for attempted murder .
Just for ADVOCATING revolution .
This is disgusting .
I feel a storm brewing.TITLE 18 &gt; PART I &gt; CHAPTER 115 &gt; 2385   2385 .
Advocating overthrow of GovernmentWhoever knowingly or willfully advocates , abets , advises , or teaches the duty , necessity , desirability , or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State , Territory , District or Possession thereof , or the government of any political subdivision therein , by force or violence , or by the assassination of any officer of any such government ; orWhoever , with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government , prints , publishes , edits , issues , circulates , sells , distributes , or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating , advising , or teaching the duty , necessity , desirability , or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence , or attempts to do so ; orWhoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society , group , or assembly of persons who teach , advocate , or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence ; or becomes or is a member of , or affiliates with , any such society , group , or assembly of persons , knowing the purposes thereof    Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years , or both , and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof , for the five years next following his conviction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The feds beat them to it a long time ago..... but they will probably just throw you in prison for 20 years.
Amazing that I can be jailed for this longer than I can be jailed for attempted murder.
Just for ADVOCATING revolution.
This is disgusting.
I feel a storm brewing.TITLE 18 &gt; PART I &gt; CHAPTER 115 &gt;  2385
  2385.
Advocating overthrow of GovernmentWhoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; orWhoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; orWhoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604</id>
	<title>Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265032740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...is currently planning on overthrowing the existing government of the United States.

Have they registered?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...is currently planning on overthrowing the existing government of the United States .
Have they registered ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...is currently planning on overthrowing the existing government of the United States.
Have they registered?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265034780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>...is currently planning on overthrowing the existing government of the United States. Have they registered?</i></p><p>Hahaha. If you bothered to read the <a href="http://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t23c029.htm" title="scstatehouse.gov" rel="nofollow">statute</a> [scstatehouse.gov], there is a useful clarification (emphasis added):</p><p>"(1) 'Subversive organization' means every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof <b>by force or violence or other unlawful means;</b>"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...is currently planning on overthrowing the existing government of the United States .
Have they registered ? Hahaha .
If you bothered to read the statute [ scstatehouse.gov ] , there is a useful clarification ( emphasis added ) : " ( 1 ) 'Subversive organization ' means every corporation , society , association , camp , group , bund , political party , assembly , body or organization , composed of two or more persons , which directly or indirectly advocates , advises , teaches or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States , of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means ; "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...is currently planning on overthrowing the existing government of the United States.
Have they registered?Hahaha.
If you bothered to read the statute [scstatehouse.gov], there is a useful clarification (emphasis added):"(1) 'Subversive organization' means every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means;"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31109184</id>
	<title>heh heh heh</title>
	<author>vaporland</author>
	<datestamp>1265905800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>he said "crackin"</htmltext>
<tokenext>he said " crackin "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>he said "crackin"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265040600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would prefer a constitutional amendment that goes something like this:</p><p>Any law which isn't enforced and has no public record of ever having been enforced for a certain period of time, say 20 years or perhaps less, that the law in question simply is null and void.</p><p>A constitutional provision is one thing, such as procedures for impeachment or something that is rarely invoked for a good reason, but for laws that impact ordinary citizens, a failure to even enforce these laws (such as the anti-sodomy laws and co-habitation/fornication laws) ought to be simply declared obsolete due to lack of enforcement.</p><p>A token enforcement merely to keep the law on the books would not be considered acceptable.  A pattern of widespread enforcement of such a law would have to be demonstrated for it to be considered valid under such a provision.</p><p>In this particular case with the terrorist registration law, I have my doubts that such a law would ever be proven to be enforced and its only purpose is to expand and exaggerate sentences in an effort to stifle free speech.  Simply asking a state officer to testify in court about how many people actually engaged in registration would be sufficient in this case to show non-enforcement of such a law.</p><p>Too bad that such a provision or legal concept is not typically a part of common law.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would prefer a constitutional amendment that goes something like this : Any law which is n't enforced and has no public record of ever having been enforced for a certain period of time , say 20 years or perhaps less , that the law in question simply is null and void.A constitutional provision is one thing , such as procedures for impeachment or something that is rarely invoked for a good reason , but for laws that impact ordinary citizens , a failure to even enforce these laws ( such as the anti-sodomy laws and co-habitation/fornication laws ) ought to be simply declared obsolete due to lack of enforcement.A token enforcement merely to keep the law on the books would not be considered acceptable .
A pattern of widespread enforcement of such a law would have to be demonstrated for it to be considered valid under such a provision.In this particular case with the terrorist registration law , I have my doubts that such a law would ever be proven to be enforced and its only purpose is to expand and exaggerate sentences in an effort to stifle free speech .
Simply asking a state officer to testify in court about how many people actually engaged in registration would be sufficient in this case to show non-enforcement of such a law.Too bad that such a provision or legal concept is not typically a part of common law .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would prefer a constitutional amendment that goes something like this:Any law which isn't enforced and has no public record of ever having been enforced for a certain period of time, say 20 years or perhaps less, that the law in question simply is null and void.A constitutional provision is one thing, such as procedures for impeachment or something that is rarely invoked for a good reason, but for laws that impact ordinary citizens, a failure to even enforce these laws (such as the anti-sodomy laws and co-habitation/fornication laws) ought to be simply declared obsolete due to lack of enforcement.A token enforcement merely to keep the law on the books would not be considered acceptable.
A pattern of widespread enforcement of such a law would have to be demonstrated for it to be considered valid under such a provision.In this particular case with the terrorist registration law, I have my doubts that such a law would ever be proven to be enforced and its only purpose is to expand and exaggerate sentences in an effort to stifle free speech.
Simply asking a state officer to testify in court about how many people actually engaged in registration would be sufficient in this case to show non-enforcement of such a law.Too bad that such a provision or legal concept is not typically a part of common law.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097238</id>
	<title>Re:Awwwww crap!</title>
	<author>adamovicz</author>
	<datestamp>1265882820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hope there isn't a tax for that!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hope there is n't a tax for that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hope there isn't a tax for that!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093924</id>
	<title>What's wrong with this picture?</title>
	<author>bit9</author>
	<datestamp>1265034060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>By "subversive organization," the law means "every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which <b>directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices</b> the duty, necessity or propriety of <b>controlling</b>, conducting, seizing or overthrowing <b>the government of the United States</b> [or] of this State."</p></div><p>Is it just me, or does that definition necessarily include all U.S. citizens of voting age?

What ever happened to "<b>for</b> the People, <b>by</b> the People" ???

Silly me, I was under the impression that it is every citizen's civic duty to control the government. It's called voting.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>By " subversive organization , " the law means " every corporation , society , association , camp , group , bund , political party , assembly , body or organization , composed of two or more persons , which directly or indirectly advocates , advises , teaches or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States [ or ] of this State .
" Is it just me , or does that definition necessarily include all U.S. citizens of voting age ?
What ever happened to " for the People , by the People " ? ? ?
Silly me , I was under the impression that it is every citizen 's civic duty to control the government .
It 's called voting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By "subversive organization," the law means "every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States [or] of this State.
"Is it just me, or does that definition necessarily include all U.S. citizens of voting age?
What ever happened to "for the People, by the People" ???
Silly me, I was under the impression that it is every citizen's civic duty to control the government.
It's called voting.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093698</id>
	<title>That seems a bit Unconstitutional.....</title>
	<author>tinkerghost</author>
	<datestamp>1265033100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Freedom of association and the right to espouse political views anonymously have been upheld frequently by the highest courts, so this is just a matter of paper politics.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Freedom of association and the right to espouse political views anonymously have been upheld frequently by the highest courts , so this is just a matter of paper politics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Freedom of association and the right to espouse political views anonymously have been upheld frequently by the highest courts, so this is just a matter of paper politics.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094238</id>
	<title>mmm yah.</title>
	<author>EdelFactor19</author>
	<datestamp>1265035500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>too bad this is going to be found unconstitutional. but thanks for letting us know you are a bunch of authoritarian red necks. Just in case we needed more proof that North Carolina is much cooler than South Carolina.<br>and 20 bucks says this was proposed by some republicans, since everyone seems to focus on calling the democrats the socialists. You know whats a million times worse than what you allege to be socialism? Fascism and Authoritarianism.  Our constitution gives us not only the right, but the responsibility to revolt and throw a revolution if the government falls out of touch. That's the whole point of democracy.<br>f-ing asshats</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>too bad this is going to be found unconstitutional .
but thanks for letting us know you are a bunch of authoritarian red necks .
Just in case we needed more proof that North Carolina is much cooler than South Carolina.and 20 bucks says this was proposed by some republicans , since everyone seems to focus on calling the democrats the socialists .
You know whats a million times worse than what you allege to be socialism ?
Fascism and Authoritarianism .
Our constitution gives us not only the right , but the responsibility to revolt and throw a revolution if the government falls out of touch .
That 's the whole point of democracy.f-ing asshats</tokentext>
<sentencetext>too bad this is going to be found unconstitutional.
but thanks for letting us know you are a bunch of authoritarian red necks.
Just in case we needed more proof that North Carolina is much cooler than South Carolina.and 20 bucks says this was proposed by some republicans, since everyone seems to focus on calling the democrats the socialists.
You know whats a million times worse than what you allege to be socialism?
Fascism and Authoritarianism.
Our constitution gives us not only the right, but the responsibility to revolt and throw a revolution if the government falls out of touch.
That's the whole point of democracy.f-ing asshats</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094336</id>
	<title>Re:Murderers, bank robbers, and rapists too.</title>
	<author>nextekcarl</author>
	<datestamp>1265035860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you intend to do anything illegal you must register. If you litter and have not registered your intention to litter we're going to come down hard on you! Planning to kill your spouse? Register now, and get 20\% off your sentence! Planning to rob a bank? Registration before Feb 15th gives you 10\% off your sentence. Planning a terrorist act? Just call 1-900-TERR-RIST, and we'll go easy on you if you don't make it right away to your chosen form of heaven...</p></div><p>I think that sounds like the government if it was run by Dave Parsons.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you intend to do anything illegal you must register .
If you litter and have not registered your intention to litter we 're going to come down hard on you !
Planning to kill your spouse ?
Register now , and get 20 \ % off your sentence !
Planning to rob a bank ?
Registration before Feb 15th gives you 10 \ % off your sentence .
Planning a terrorist act ?
Just call 1-900-TERR-RIST , and we 'll go easy on you if you do n't make it right away to your chosen form of heaven...I think that sounds like the government if it was run by Dave Parsons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you intend to do anything illegal you must register.
If you litter and have not registered your intention to litter we're going to come down hard on you!
Planning to kill your spouse?
Register now, and get 20\% off your sentence!
Planning to rob a bank?
Registration before Feb 15th gives you 10\% off your sentence.
Planning a terrorist act?
Just call 1-900-TERR-RIST, and we'll go easy on you if you don't make it right away to your chosen form of heaven...I think that sounds like the government if it was run by Dave Parsons.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095206</id>
	<title>Re:Register Here!</title>
	<author>gabebear</author>
	<datestamp>1265041800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I want to register... this is hilarious.<br> <br>
This isn't the Federal Gov... it's some stupid self-important good-old-boy redneck lawmakers needing a new way to waste money...<br> <br>
I want to create a group with the aim of getting statehood revoked for Southern Carolina, thus overthrowing the state's government and requiring registration. The main problem is I live in TN, and I will need to conspire with someone from SC.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to register... this is hilarious .
This is n't the Federal Gov... it 's some stupid self-important good-old-boy redneck lawmakers needing a new way to waste money.. . I want to create a group with the aim of getting statehood revoked for Southern Carolina , thus overthrowing the state 's government and requiring registration .
The main problem is I live in TN , and I will need to conspire with someone from SC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to register... this is hilarious.
This isn't the Federal Gov... it's some stupid self-important good-old-boy redneck lawmakers needing a new way to waste money... 
I want to create a group with the aim of getting statehood revoked for Southern Carolina, thus overthrowing the state's government and requiring registration.
The main problem is I live in TN, and I will need to conspire with someone from SC.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093654</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097006</id>
	<title>Bombing licenses?</title>
	<author>golodh</author>
	<datestamp>1265879280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Much as I admire South-Carolina's unexpected, wise and brilliant move in requiring groups bent on overthrowing the US government to register themselves, I have one question.
<p>
Does this mean that groups who are properly registered will actually be able to get a license to "Detonate explosives, release poisonous, virulent, or radio-active substances in urban areas, means of public transport, or public meeting places with the intent to inflict injuries or casualties on the general populace"?
</p><p>
Just asking. You just never know with geniuses like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Much as I admire South-Carolina 's unexpected , wise and brilliant move in requiring groups bent on overthrowing the US government to register themselves , I have one question .
Does this mean that groups who are properly registered will actually be able to get a license to " Detonate explosives , release poisonous , virulent , or radio-active substances in urban areas , means of public transport , or public meeting places with the intent to inflict injuries or casualties on the general populace " ?
Just asking .
You just never know with geniuses like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Much as I admire South-Carolina's unexpected, wise and brilliant move in requiring groups bent on overthrowing the US government to register themselves, I have one question.
Does this mean that groups who are properly registered will actually be able to get a license to "Detonate explosives, release poisonous, virulent, or radio-active substances in urban areas, means of public transport, or public meeting places with the intent to inflict injuries or casualties on the general populace"?
Just asking.
You just never know with geniuses like that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099546</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1265903700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That wouldn't work. Also what scope does the law have?<br>Let me give you an example. In the town I grew up in there hadn't been a murder in 25 years at one point. Would you then repeal the law on murder?<br>The town I live in makes opening a casino illegal. Nobody has opened a casino so is it now legal?<br>And as for as scope hasn't been enforced in where? The town, city, state, or country?</p><p>This law does seem outlandish. Would the republican party need to register since they are trying to unseat the democratic party?</p><p>The one part I do feel is of use, is the agent provision.  If you are working on behave of another nation in the US you should have to register that.  I have no problem with the idea that none citizens have fewer rights than citizens. Of course one would have to be careful to not allow outrageous abuses of visitors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That would n't work .
Also what scope does the law have ? Let me give you an example .
In the town I grew up in there had n't been a murder in 25 years at one point .
Would you then repeal the law on murder ? The town I live in makes opening a casino illegal .
Nobody has opened a casino so is it now legal ? And as for as scope has n't been enforced in where ?
The town , city , state , or country ? This law does seem outlandish .
Would the republican party need to register since they are trying to unseat the democratic party ? The one part I do feel is of use , is the agent provision .
If you are working on behave of another nation in the US you should have to register that .
I have no problem with the idea that none citizens have fewer rights than citizens .
Of course one would have to be careful to not allow outrageous abuses of visitors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That wouldn't work.
Also what scope does the law have?Let me give you an example.
In the town I grew up in there hadn't been a murder in 25 years at one point.
Would you then repeal the law on murder?The town I live in makes opening a casino illegal.
Nobody has opened a casino so is it now legal?And as for as scope hasn't been enforced in where?
The town, city, state, or country?This law does seem outlandish.
Would the republican party need to register since they are trying to unseat the democratic party?The one part I do feel is of use, is the agent provision.
If you are working on behave of another nation in the US you should have to register that.
I have no problem with the idea that none citizens have fewer rights than citizens.
Of course one would have to be careful to not allow outrageous abuses of visitors.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100286</id>
	<title>Ah, Beauracracy.  Is There Anything It Can't Solve</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265907060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's cut them some slack here.  I mean since they started requiring sex offenders to register as such, there have been what-- five, maybe six kids tops that have been raped? Registration works.I think they are onto something.</p><p>I just hope after they set up registration systems for every possible crime someone feels they might commit (speeder registration, jaywalker registration, pot smoker registration) and make it a crime in and of itself to not be registered to commit a crime they are registered to commit, that they set up a unregistered criminal registration system in case I commit a crime I am not registered to commit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's cut them some slack here .
I mean since they started requiring sex offenders to register as such , there have been what-- five , maybe six kids tops that have been raped ?
Registration works.I think they are onto something.I just hope after they set up registration systems for every possible crime someone feels they might commit ( speeder registration , jaywalker registration , pot smoker registration ) and make it a crime in and of itself to not be registered to commit a crime they are registered to commit , that they set up a unregistered criminal registration system in case I commit a crime I am not registered to commit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's cut them some slack here.
I mean since they started requiring sex offenders to register as such, there have been what-- five, maybe six kids tops that have been raped?
Registration works.I think they are onto something.I just hope after they set up registration systems for every possible crime someone feels they might commit (speeder registration, jaywalker registration, pot smoker registration) and make it a crime in and of itself to not be registered to commit a crime they are registered to commit, that they set up a unregistered criminal registration system in case I commit a crime I am not registered to commit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31132366</id>
	<title>Up to Interpretation</title>
	<author>frogstarr78</author>
	<datestamp>1266081720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry as seemingly ridiculous this is, it scares the pants off me. It's only a matter of time before the courts start interpreting anyone's behavior as teaching or practicing the duty of overthrowing the government of the US, the state of SC, or any political subdivision by unlawful means. e.g. a religious organization whose behavior the court doesn't approve of.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry as seemingly ridiculous this is , it scares the pants off me .
It 's only a matter of time before the courts start interpreting anyone 's behavior as teaching or practicing the duty of overthrowing the government of the US , the state of SC , or any political subdivision by unlawful means .
e.g. a religious organization whose behavior the court does n't approve of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry as seemingly ridiculous this is, it scares the pants off me.
It's only a matter of time before the courts start interpreting anyone's behavior as teaching or practicing the duty of overthrowing the government of the US, the state of SC, or any political subdivision by unlawful means.
e.g. a religious organization whose behavior the court doesn't approve of.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093930</id>
	<title>New laws</title>
	<author>jmv</author>
	<datestamp>1265034060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it just me or is there an increase in the number of new laws (not just in the US) that basically state that it's illegal to do illegal stuff? I'm trying to find the rational explanation for that, but so far I've failed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me or is there an increase in the number of new laws ( not just in the US ) that basically state that it 's illegal to do illegal stuff ?
I 'm trying to find the rational explanation for that , but so far I 've failed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me or is there an increase in the number of new laws (not just in the US) that basically state that it's illegal to do illegal stuff?
I'm trying to find the rational explanation for that, but so far I've failed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31146750</id>
	<title>Register to overthrown?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266262800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Guess the U.S. Congress, the President (doesn't matter which one), and the board members of most of the large Wall Street corps and banks (Goldman Sachs come to mind) should line up first. Oh, well, maybe they should start with the clueless assholes who thought of this and passed it.<br>Contrary to popular opinion, stupidity is <b>not</b> a virtue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guess the U.S. Congress , the President ( does n't matter which one ) , and the board members of most of the large Wall Street corps and banks ( Goldman Sachs come to mind ) should line up first .
Oh , well , maybe they should start with the clueless assholes who thought of this and passed it.Contrary to popular opinion , stupidity is not a virtue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guess the U.S. Congress, the President (doesn't matter which one), and the board members of most of the large Wall Street corps and banks (Goldman Sachs come to mind) should line up first.
Oh, well, maybe they should start with the clueless assholes who thought of this and passed it.Contrary to popular opinion, stupidity is not a virtue.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093656</id>
	<title>Money Grab</title>
	<author>bflong</author>
	<datestamp>1265032920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like a money grab. US arrests 'terrorists', S.C. fines them $25k for not registering...<br>I'm sure they will get their money too... hahahaha<br>Nevermind. This is just stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like a money grab .
US arrests 'terrorists ' , S.C. fines them $ 25k for not registering...I 'm sure they will get their money too... hahahahaNevermind. This is just stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like a money grab.
US arrests 'terrorists', S.C. fines them $25k for not registering...I'm sure they will get their money too... hahahahaNevermind. This is just stupid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093956</id>
	<title>Re:That seems a bit Unconstitutional.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265034180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And you somehow think that this Supreme Court is going to uphold the constitution?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And you somehow think that this Supreme Court is going to uphold the constitution ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And you somehow think that this Supreme Court is going to uphold the constitution?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093980</id>
	<title>What are we going to do tonight Brain?</title>
	<author>Seraphim\_72</author>
	<datestamp>1265034300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The same thing we do every night Pinky, try to take over the world! We just won't start in South Carolina.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The same thing we do every night Pinky , try to take over the world !
We just wo n't start in South Carolina .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The same thing we do every night Pinky, try to take over the world!
We just won't start in South Carolina.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093878</id>
	<title>Oh sweet</title>
	<author>Acecoolco</author>
	<datestamp>1265033820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So we do not have to register if we only want to invoke pain and terror on the citizens... SWEET.. safe until the next bill...</htmltext>
<tokenext>So we do not have to register if we only want to invoke pain and terror on the citizens... SWEET.. safe until the next bill.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So we do not have to register if we only want to invoke pain and terror on the citizens... SWEET.. safe until the next bill...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094024</id>
	<title>Democratic Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265034480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>has already overthrown the former government of the United States.</p><p>Equal time and all that rot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>has already overthrown the former government of the United States.Equal time and all that rot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>has already overthrown the former government of the United States.Equal time and all that rot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095848</id>
	<title>Is This...</title>
	<author>blueforce</author>
	<datestamp>1265046780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is this a new Monty Python sketch?  It sounds funny, where can I watch it?

Seriously though, South Carolina's public schools \_are\_ ranked last in the nation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this a new Monty Python sketch ?
It sounds funny , where can I watch it ?
Seriously though , South Carolina 's public schools \ _are \ _ ranked last in the nation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this a new Monty Python sketch?
It sounds funny, where can I watch it?
Seriously though, South Carolina's public schools \_are\_ ranked last in the nation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096264</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>Vektuz</author>
	<datestamp>1265050500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I prefer the simpler "For every new law you make two must be removed."

It will be easy at first.

And I'm talking law, the constitution is of course off limits<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer the simpler " For every new law you make two must be removed .
" It will be easy at first .
And I 'm talking law , the constitution is of course off limits : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer the simpler "For every new law you make two must be removed.
"

It will be easy at first.
And I'm talking law, the constitution is of course off limits :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096290</id>
	<title>How it will go down.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265050860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Somebody protests something in a sit down.  Police officer pulls his back trying to remove subject.  Subject is charged for hurting the police officer + this 25k for not registering.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somebody protests something in a sit down .
Police officer pulls his back trying to remove subject .
Subject is charged for hurting the police officer + this 25k for not registering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somebody protests something in a sit down.
Police officer pulls his back trying to remove subject.
Subject is charged for hurting the police officer + this 25k for not registering.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096982</id>
	<title>Re:Easy way to "democratically" jail and fine diss</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265879040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>isn't armed insurrection one of our constitutional rights?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is n't armed insurrection one of our constitutional rights ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>isn't armed insurrection one of our constitutional rights?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095404</id>
	<title>Re:No difference to them</title>
	<author>neghvar1</author>
	<datestamp>1265043300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here is an indication that what I said above is not too far off.

<a href="http://www.infowars.com/secret-state-police-report-ron-paul-bob-barr-chuck-baldwin-libertarians-are-terrorists/" title="infowars.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.infowars.com/secret-state-police-report-ron-paul-bob-barr-chuck-baldwin-libertarians-are-terrorists/</a> [infowars.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is an indication that what I said above is not too far off .
http : //www.infowars.com/secret-state-police-report-ron-paul-bob-barr-chuck-baldwin-libertarians-are-terrorists/ [ infowars.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is an indication that what I said above is not too far off.
http://www.infowars.com/secret-state-police-report-ron-paul-bob-barr-chuck-baldwin-libertarians-are-terrorists/ [infowars.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094754</id>
	<title>BS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265038500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Crap like this suggests that it is time to replace the government, and it sounds like they know it is coming...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Crap like this suggests that it is time to replace the government , and it sounds like they know it is coming.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Crap like this suggests that it is time to replace the government, and it sounds like they know it is coming...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099450</id>
	<title>Thoughtcrimes</title>
	<author>AlpineR</author>
	<datestamp>1265903160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a law to create a thoughtcrime.  Terrorists apparently aren't deterred by threats of punishment after committing their acts; they tend to administer the ultimate punishment to themselves.  So governments want ways to prosecute illegal activities before they happen.  Thus the threshold of illegal activity moves back from detonating a bomb to building a bomb to designing a bomb to talking about a bomb to thinking about a bomb.  It's not irrational to prevent devastating acts by illegalizing their precedents; we already have laws against carrying certain weapons, even though just carrying a weapon doesn't hurt anybody.  But when the laws start focusing on speech then the rational response becomes fuzzy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a law to create a thoughtcrime .
Terrorists apparently are n't deterred by threats of punishment after committing their acts ; they tend to administer the ultimate punishment to themselves .
So governments want ways to prosecute illegal activities before they happen .
Thus the threshold of illegal activity moves back from detonating a bomb to building a bomb to designing a bomb to talking about a bomb to thinking about a bomb .
It 's not irrational to prevent devastating acts by illegalizing their precedents ; we already have laws against carrying certain weapons , even though just carrying a weapon does n't hurt anybody .
But when the laws start focusing on speech then the rational response becomes fuzzy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a law to create a thoughtcrime.
Terrorists apparently aren't deterred by threats of punishment after committing their acts; they tend to administer the ultimate punishment to themselves.
So governments want ways to prosecute illegal activities before they happen.
Thus the threshold of illegal activity moves back from detonating a bomb to building a bomb to designing a bomb to talking about a bomb to thinking about a bomb.
It's not irrational to prevent devastating acts by illegalizing their precedents; we already have laws against carrying certain weapons, even though just carrying a weapon doesn't hurt anybody.
But when the laws start focusing on speech then the rational response becomes fuzzy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31147638</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>AnotherUsername</author>
	<datestamp>1266266880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think that either party is trying to do so <i>by force or violence or other unlawful means</i>.  That is the clarifying bit that makes someone have to register.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think that either party is trying to do so by force or violence or other unlawful means .
That is the clarifying bit that makes someone have to register .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think that either party is trying to do so by force or violence or other unlawful means.
That is the clarifying bit that makes someone have to register.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095352</id>
	<title>It's been repealed. Nothing to see here.</title>
	<author>PaganRitual</author>
	<datestamp>1265043000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In other news, The Office of Homeland Security is now offering FREE BOATS to the following people<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In other news , The Office of Homeland Security is now offering FREE BOATS to the following people .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other news, The Office of Homeland Security is now offering FREE BOATS to the following people ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094254</id>
	<title>Re:Murderers, bank robbers, and rapists too.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265035560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But your honor and ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the fact that i have not registered is clear and irrefutable evidence that i had not planned to litter and kill my spouse while robbing that bank.  Clearly this was all an accident, or possibly side effects from my Ambien, but the people cannot refute that i had no intentions of doing any of these things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But your honor and ladies and gentlemen of the jury , the fact that i have not registered is clear and irrefutable evidence that i had not planned to litter and kill my spouse while robbing that bank .
Clearly this was all an accident , or possibly side effects from my Ambien , but the people can not refute that i had no intentions of doing any of these things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But your honor and ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the fact that i have not registered is clear and irrefutable evidence that i had not planned to litter and kill my spouse while robbing that bank.
Clearly this was all an accident, or possibly side effects from my Ambien, but the people cannot refute that i had no intentions of doing any of these things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094186</id>
	<title>Re:Ironic</title>
	<author>wizardforce</author>
	<datestamp>1265035200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>South Carolina doesn't exactly have the best record on following the constitution so it might not be so ironic that they've decided to toss the first amendment as being irrelevant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>South Carolina does n't exactly have the best record on following the constitution so it might not be so ironic that they 've decided to toss the first amendment as being irrelevant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>South Carolina doesn't exactly have the best record on following the constitution so it might not be so ironic that they've decided to toss the first amendment as being irrelevant.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095378</id>
	<title>Re:Awwwww crap!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265043120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually the law applies to subversive organizations, organizations under foreign control, foreign agents, and indivuduals that meet the requirements of a subversive organization, except for the requirement of consisting of two or more persons.</p><p>Personally, I think organizations should register with a cover letter explaining that they reserve the right to overthrow the government in the event of of a zombie apocalypse that has decimated the government, or other events where the government is indisputably no longer able to perform its function, and cannot be reasonably expected to repair itself.</p><p>For example, in such event, I reserve the right to establish a New World Order, which inherently means overthrowing the UN and the governments of the member nations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually the law applies to subversive organizations , organizations under foreign control , foreign agents , and indivuduals that meet the requirements of a subversive organization , except for the requirement of consisting of two or more persons.Personally , I think organizations should register with a cover letter explaining that they reserve the right to overthrow the government in the event of of a zombie apocalypse that has decimated the government , or other events where the government is indisputably no longer able to perform its function , and can not be reasonably expected to repair itself.For example , in such event , I reserve the right to establish a New World Order , which inherently means overthrowing the UN and the governments of the member nations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually the law applies to subversive organizations, organizations under foreign control, foreign agents, and indivuduals that meet the requirements of a subversive organization, except for the requirement of consisting of two or more persons.Personally, I think organizations should register with a cover letter explaining that they reserve the right to overthrow the government in the event of of a zombie apocalypse that has decimated the government, or other events where the government is indisputably no longer able to perform its function, and cannot be reasonably expected to repair itself.For example, in such event, I reserve the right to establish a New World Order, which inherently means overthrowing the UN and the governments of the member nations.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100816</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265909520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This country never learn... that looks like 1947-1960s era of McCarthysm! One day you had some books written by "socialist-minded artists" then you had to face a court. Call first or fifth amendement of US constitution in front of the Supreme Court and either go to jail or never work in US again (HUAC blacklists). "Register your organization to Attorney General and give names, commies!"</p><p>Just change "communism" by "terrorism" and you're back in a bad copy of Orwell's 1984. Fear and approval of laws restricting liberty are the shared means of lawyers and anti-democratic people. It's just a shame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This country never learn... that looks like 1947-1960s era of McCarthysm !
One day you had some books written by " socialist-minded artists " then you had to face a court .
Call first or fifth amendement of US constitution in front of the Supreme Court and either go to jail or never work in US again ( HUAC blacklists ) .
" Register your organization to Attorney General and give names , commies !
" Just change " communism " by " terrorism " and you 're back in a bad copy of Orwell 's 1984 .
Fear and approval of laws restricting liberty are the shared means of lawyers and anti-democratic people .
It 's just a shame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This country never learn... that looks like 1947-1960s era of McCarthysm!
One day you had some books written by "socialist-minded artists" then you had to face a court.
Call first or fifth amendement of US constitution in front of the Supreme Court and either go to jail or never work in US again (HUAC blacklists).
"Register your organization to Attorney General and give names, commies!
"Just change "communism" by "terrorism" and you're back in a bad copy of Orwell's 1984.
Fear and approval of laws restricting liberty are the shared means of lawyers and anti-democratic people.
It's just a shame.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094712</id>
	<title>Big deal</title>
	<author>Alien Being</author>
	<datestamp>1265038260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When rednecks talk about overthrowing the U.S. they're just talking shit about U.S. Grant.  They've been doing that for 150 years.  They're all insane from the moonshine and the inbreeding.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When rednecks talk about overthrowing the U.S. they 're just talking shit about U.S. Grant. They 've been doing that for 150 years .
They 're all insane from the moonshine and the inbreeding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When rednecks talk about overthrowing the U.S. they're just talking shit about U.S. Grant.  They've been doing that for 150 years.
They're all insane from the moonshine and the inbreeding.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094516</id>
	<title>I wouldn't be too flippant</title>
	<author>angry tapir</author>
	<datestamp>1265036880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Reminds me of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith\_Act" title="wikipedia.org">the Smith Act.</a> [wikipedia.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of the the Smith Act .
[ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of the the Smith Act.
[wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094854</id>
	<title>Did they just outlaw civics teachers?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265039160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> 'every member of a subversive organization, or an organization subject to foreign control, every foreign agent and <b>every person who</b> advocates, <b>teaches</b>, advises or practices <b>the duty, necessity or propriety</b> of controlling, <b>conducting</b>, seizing or overthrowing <b>the government of the United States</b><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... shall register with the Secretary of State.'</p></div><p>Do they ever even consider running these things past a high school English teacher or equivalent before they put them to a vote?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>'every member of a subversive organization , or an organization subject to foreign control , every foreign agent and every person who advocates , teaches , advises or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States ... shall register with the Secretary of State .
'Do they ever even consider running these things past a high school English teacher or equivalent before they put them to a vote ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> 'every member of a subversive organization, or an organization subject to foreign control, every foreign agent and every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States ... shall register with the Secretary of State.
'Do they ever even consider running these things past a high school English teacher or equivalent before they put them to a vote?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093672</id>
	<title>Look Out FOX NEWS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265033040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This must mean that Bill O Reilly and FOX News must register now as a subversive organization.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This must mean that Bill O Reilly and FOX News must register now as a subversive organization .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This must mean that Bill O Reilly and FOX News must register now as a subversive organization.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094212</id>
	<title>What about Confederates?</title>
	<author>srobert</author>
	<datestamp>1265035380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I drove through South Carolina not long ago. You see lots of rebel flags flying, especially in the rural areas. Is that subversive? Is the state going to go after them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I drove through South Carolina not long ago .
You see lots of rebel flags flying , especially in the rural areas .
Is that subversive ?
Is the state going to go after them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I drove through South Carolina not long ago.
You see lots of rebel flags flying, especially in the rural areas.
Is that subversive?
Is the state going to go after them?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097674</id>
	<title>Nice!</title>
	<author>nospam007</author>
	<datestamp>1265887860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great idea, they should expand that.<br>How about compensation from the muggers guild when you get robbed by an unlicensed mugger?</p><p>I think those guys came right from the Diskworld.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great idea , they should expand that.How about compensation from the muggers guild when you get robbed by an unlicensed mugger ? I think those guys came right from the Diskworld .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great idea, they should expand that.How about compensation from the muggers guild when you get robbed by an unlicensed mugger?I think those guys came right from the Diskworld.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093760</id>
	<title>Does this apply to Democrats as well as Republican</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265033400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously, any opposition political party is interested in seizing the government of the United States.  Since the Democrats currently have power (although it's not nearly as clear as in a parliamentary system), that implies that every Republican supporter must register.</p><p>But plenty of Democrats aren't happy with the U.S. government either... so should they register?</p><p>It seems like this is basically a poll tax on people who want to vote...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously , any opposition political party is interested in seizing the government of the United States .
Since the Democrats currently have power ( although it 's not nearly as clear as in a parliamentary system ) , that implies that every Republican supporter must register.But plenty of Democrats are n't happy with the U.S. government either... so should they register ? It seems like this is basically a poll tax on people who want to vote.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously, any opposition political party is interested in seizing the government of the United States.
Since the Democrats currently have power (although it's not nearly as clear as in a parliamentary system), that implies that every Republican supporter must register.But plenty of Democrats aren't happy with the U.S. government either... so should they register?It seems like this is basically a poll tax on people who want to vote...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094770</id>
	<title>If they charge for it...</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1265038620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they charge for it, they could have at least thrown in a t-shirt which says "officially registered in South Carolina as subversive", or something along these lines.</p><p>It would promote tourism, too. Win-win!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they charge for it , they could have at least thrown in a t-shirt which says " officially registered in South Carolina as subversive " , or something along these lines.It would promote tourism , too .
Win-win !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they charge for it, they could have at least thrown in a t-shirt which says "officially registered in South Carolina as subversive", or something along these lines.It would promote tourism, too.
Win-win!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093630</id>
	<title>subversive?</title>
	<author>SoupGuru</author>
	<datestamp>1265032860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, if they did that then they wouldn't be subversive now, would they?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if they did that then they would n't be subversive now , would they ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if they did that then they wouldn't be subversive now, would they?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093852</id>
	<title>One state down, 49 more to go....</title>
	<author>ZosX</author>
	<datestamp>1265033700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can see other states passing laws such as this. I would think that if you were planning on overthrowing the government, doing so "legally" by registering your intent probably wouldn't seem like the brightest idea. This is akin to requiring bank robbers to register before they go rob a bank. Who in their right mind would do anything? Also notice that it says on the clause:</p><p><i>"(1) "Subversive organization" means every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means; </i></p><p>"advocate"........."advise"..........   These words are the result of sharing your opinion. You "advocate" or you "advise" somebody on a matter. This basically makes thought and speech crimes if you do not register to speak your opinion. If we share opinions then we need to register. I honestly cannot fathom what crime this useless law is meant to deter from, nor see how it will protect anyone from anything. Any sort of restrictions on free speech and the right to assembly (also attacked here) are movements towards taking power and freedoms away from people. My oh my how utterly un-american we have so become........the sad part is that the people that vote these laws into action consider themselves patriots (notice how patriotism is explicitly exempt from this law, which opens up all sorts of avenues......militias are patriotic too........) I hope they gave George and Tom lots of space to roll in their coffins......................</p><p>America.....pure irony at its best!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can see other states passing laws such as this .
I would think that if you were planning on overthrowing the government , doing so " legally " by registering your intent probably would n't seem like the brightest idea .
This is akin to requiring bank robbers to register before they go rob a bank .
Who in their right mind would do anything ?
Also notice that it says on the clause : " ( 1 ) " Subversive organization " means every corporation , society , association , camp , group , bund , political party , assembly , body or organization , composed of two or more persons , which directly or indirectly advocates , advises , teaches or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States , of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means ; " advocate " ......... " advise " .......... These words are the result of sharing your opinion .
You " advocate " or you " advise " somebody on a matter .
This basically makes thought and speech crimes if you do not register to speak your opinion .
If we share opinions then we need to register .
I honestly can not fathom what crime this useless law is meant to deter from , nor see how it will protect anyone from anything .
Any sort of restrictions on free speech and the right to assembly ( also attacked here ) are movements towards taking power and freedoms away from people .
My oh my how utterly un-american we have so become........the sad part is that the people that vote these laws into action consider themselves patriots ( notice how patriotism is explicitly exempt from this law , which opens up all sorts of avenues......militias are patriotic too........ ) I hope they gave George and Tom lots of space to roll in their coffins......................America.....pure irony at its best !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can see other states passing laws such as this.
I would think that if you were planning on overthrowing the government, doing so "legally" by registering your intent probably wouldn't seem like the brightest idea.
This is akin to requiring bank robbers to register before they go rob a bank.
Who in their right mind would do anything?
Also notice that it says on the clause:"(1) "Subversive organization" means every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means; "advocate"........."advise"..........   These words are the result of sharing your opinion.
You "advocate" or you "advise" somebody on a matter.
This basically makes thought and speech crimes if you do not register to speak your opinion.
If we share opinions then we need to register.
I honestly cannot fathom what crime this useless law is meant to deter from, nor see how it will protect anyone from anything.
Any sort of restrictions on free speech and the right to assembly (also attacked here) are movements towards taking power and freedoms away from people.
My oh my how utterly un-american we have so become........the sad part is that the people that vote these laws into action consider themselves patriots (notice how patriotism is explicitly exempt from this law, which opens up all sorts of avenues......militias are patriotic too........) I hope they gave George and Tom lots of space to roll in their coffins......................America.....pure irony at its best!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31109292</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>DaleSwanson</author>
	<datestamp>1265906880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, I know.  However the version of the Patriot Act that repassed had two important features.  First it was somewhat less insane than the first.  Second it doesn't have any more sunset clauses, which means it is here to stay.</p><p>As for the extra work load, I thinks the pros would outweigh that.  Frankly, congress doesn't read the laws before passing them now.  At least if the law was being renewed they would have had years to maybe read parts of it, and the public could have analyzed it.  Since obvious stuff would likely pass with 80+ it would mean that laws would only need to be renewed every 25 years, which I think is reasonable.</p><p>I may be open to the idea of some types of legislature being exempt, but I think that is very difficult to do in a way that can't be exploited.  I'd like this to be as simple as possible, done in the Constitution and apply to all laws federal, state, and local (except the Constitution itself, and perhaps state's constitutions).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , I know .
However the version of the Patriot Act that repassed had two important features .
First it was somewhat less insane than the first .
Second it does n't have any more sunset clauses , which means it is here to stay.As for the extra work load , I thinks the pros would outweigh that .
Frankly , congress does n't read the laws before passing them now .
At least if the law was being renewed they would have had years to maybe read parts of it , and the public could have analyzed it .
Since obvious stuff would likely pass with 80 + it would mean that laws would only need to be renewed every 25 years , which I think is reasonable.I may be open to the idea of some types of legislature being exempt , but I think that is very difficult to do in a way that ca n't be exploited .
I 'd like this to be as simple as possible , done in the Constitution and apply to all laws federal , state , and local ( except the Constitution itself , and perhaps state 's constitutions ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, I know.
However the version of the Patriot Act that repassed had two important features.
First it was somewhat less insane than the first.
Second it doesn't have any more sunset clauses, which means it is here to stay.As for the extra work load, I thinks the pros would outweigh that.
Frankly, congress doesn't read the laws before passing them now.
At least if the law was being renewed they would have had years to maybe read parts of it, and the public could have analyzed it.
Since obvious stuff would likely pass with 80+ it would mean that laws would only need to be renewed every 25 years, which I think is reasonable.I may be open to the idea of some types of legislature being exempt, but I think that is very difficult to do in a way that can't be exploited.
I'd like this to be as simple as possible, done in the Constitution and apply to all laws federal, state, and local (except the Constitution itself, and perhaps state's constitutions).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095566</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>DaleSwanson</author>
	<datestamp>1265044500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd rather just place a time limit on all laws after which they would need to be renewed or become null and void.  The period would range between 2-25 laws based on what majority (which ever house was less) it passed with (say 50-60 = 5, 60-70 = 10, 70-80 = 20, 80+ = 25).  All new laws would be 5 year regardless of the majority (to prevent panic laws like Patriot Act from starting with 25 years).  All existing laws would start with whatever period they should have based on the scale (exempt from 5 year mandatory first period).  A law could only be renewed in the year it was due for renewal (to avoid parties from passing pet laws when they had control).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd rather just place a time limit on all laws after which they would need to be renewed or become null and void .
The period would range between 2-25 laws based on what majority ( which ever house was less ) it passed with ( say 50-60 = 5 , 60-70 = 10 , 70-80 = 20 , 80 + = 25 ) .
All new laws would be 5 year regardless of the majority ( to prevent panic laws like Patriot Act from starting with 25 years ) .
All existing laws would start with whatever period they should have based on the scale ( exempt from 5 year mandatory first period ) .
A law could only be renewed in the year it was due for renewal ( to avoid parties from passing pet laws when they had control ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd rather just place a time limit on all laws after which they would need to be renewed or become null and void.
The period would range between 2-25 laws based on what majority (which ever house was less) it passed with (say 50-60 = 5, 60-70 = 10, 70-80 = 20, 80+ = 25).
All new laws would be 5 year regardless of the majority (to prevent panic laws like Patriot Act from starting with 25 years).
All existing laws would start with whatever period they should have based on the scale (exempt from 5 year mandatory first period).
A law could only be renewed in the year it was due for renewal (to avoid parties from passing pet laws when they had control).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094666</id>
	<title>I For One ...</title>
	<author>Compulawyer</author>
	<datestamp>1265037900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>... welcome our new registration overlords.  I feel safer already.
<p>
Why didn't the federal government think of this?  We could have already had a beowulf cluster of airport security checkpoint imaging machines matching pre-flight body scans with names from the registration list.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... welcome our new registration overlords .
I feel safer already .
Why did n't the federal government think of this ?
We could have already had a beowulf cluster of airport security checkpoint imaging machines matching pre-flight body scans with names from the registration list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... welcome our new registration overlords.
I feel safer already.
Why didn't the federal government think of this?
We could have already had a beowulf cluster of airport security checkpoint imaging machines matching pre-flight body scans with names from the registration list.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31110332</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>EricTheO</author>
	<datestamp>1266007140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Has the Tea-Bag Party registered yet?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has the Tea-Bag Party registered yet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has the Tea-Bag Party registered yet?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100152</id>
	<title>Also Add</title>
	<author>hduff</author>
	<datestamp>1265906520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... or who lies aboput hiking the Appalachian Trail, or who makes condescending remarks about poor people, or calls the President a liar from the floor of Congress<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>Hey -- it's South Carolina! The 'South Carolina List of Bad Things (tm)' could go on and on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... or who lies aboput hiking the Appalachian Trail , or who makes condescending remarks about poor people , or calls the President a liar from the floor of Congress ...Hey -- it 's South Carolina !
The 'South Carolina List of Bad Things ( tm ) ' could go on and on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... or who lies aboput hiking the Appalachian Trail, or who makes condescending remarks about poor people, or calls the President a liar from the floor of Congress ...Hey -- it's South Carolina!
The 'South Carolina List of Bad Things (tm)' could go on and on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093614</id>
	<title>Can I mail it in or what?</title>
	<author>honestmonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1265032800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I mean, I don't want to have to drive all the way to South Carolina if I can avoid it. Especially with gas prices the way they are now, and subversive equipment costs going through the roof.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , I do n't want to have to drive all the way to South Carolina if I can avoid it .
Especially with gas prices the way they are now , and subversive equipment costs going through the roof .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, I don't want to have to drive all the way to South Carolina if I can avoid it.
Especially with gas prices the way they are now, and subversive equipment costs going through the roof.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31102810</id>
	<title>Can out-of-state groups register?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265918100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I feel a need to sign up, to protest exactly this sort of thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel a need to sign up , to protest exactly this sort of thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel a need to sign up, to protest exactly this sort of thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31101390</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265912700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>... <b>by force or violence or other unlawful means;</b>"</p></div><p>"By force or violence" is a misdirection.  "Or other unlawful means" literally includes double parking or jaywalking.  Basically they can get you for anything.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... by force or violence or other unlawful means ; " " By force or violence " is a misdirection .
" Or other unlawful means " literally includes double parking or jaywalking .
Basically they can get you for anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... by force or violence or other unlawful means;""By force or violence" is a misdirection.
"Or other unlawful means" literally includes double parking or jaywalking.
Basically they can get you for anything.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093838</id>
	<title>Subversive?</title>
	<author>maxgilead</author>
	<datestamp>1265033640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know about you but I was pondering for a while why would South Carolina care so much about Eclipse's SVN plugin (http://www.eclipse.org/subversive/)...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know about you but I was pondering for a while why would South Carolina care so much about Eclipse 's SVN plugin ( http : //www.eclipse.org/subversive/ ) .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know about you but I was pondering for a while why would South Carolina care so much about Eclipse's SVN plugin (http://www.eclipse.org/subversive/)...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093886</id>
	<title>Didn't RTFA</title>
	<author>douglasdoughty</author>
	<datestamp>1265033880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>but, if the description can be trusted: "every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States"

Then, members of political parties, local and state representatives, and lobbyists all have to register on this list as well...unless they are actually not trying to control or conduct the government...</htmltext>
<tokenext>but , if the description can be trusted : " every person who advocates , teaches , advises or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States " Then , members of political parties , local and state representatives , and lobbyists all have to register on this list as well...unless they are actually not trying to control or conduct the government.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but, if the description can be trusted: "every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States"

Then, members of political parties, local and state representatives, and lobbyists all have to register on this list as well...unless they are actually not trying to control or conduct the government...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095764</id>
	<title>Does registering as a political party or lobby</title>
	<author>HydroPhonic</author>
	<datestamp>1265046120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... automatically register one as a member of a subversive group as well?  Ahh, selective prosecution....<p><div class="quote"><p>"Subversive organization" means every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of <b>controlling, conducting</b>, seizing <b>or</b> overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means;</p> </div><p>Such as bribery, gerrymandering (oops, that's not unlawful), or vote tampering (that is!)....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... automatically register one as a member of a subversive group as well ?
Ahh , selective prosecution.... " Subversive organization " means every corporation , society , association , camp , group , bund , political party , assembly , body or organization , composed of two or more persons , which directly or indirectly advocates , advises , teaches or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States , of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means ; Such as bribery , gerrymandering ( oops , that 's not unlawful ) , or vote tampering ( that is !
) ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... automatically register one as a member of a subversive group as well?
Ahh, selective prosecution...."Subversive organization" means every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means; Such as bribery, gerrymandering (oops, that's not unlawful), or vote tampering (that is!
)....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095690</id>
	<title>Foreign Control?</title>
	<author>Kozar\_The\_Malignant</author>
	<datestamp>1265045400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's see...  I'm an officially licensed USSF soccer referee.  The US Soccer Federation is subject to control by FIFA, headquarters in Zurich, Switzerland whose President, Sepp Blatter is no friend of the US.  Thank god I don't live in South Calinky, or I'd have to register for sure... probably have to turn in any of my colleagues who didn't.  Maybe the SC legislature can start up its own House Un-American Activities Committee and give the next Nixon a leg up the ladder.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's see... I 'm an officially licensed USSF soccer referee .
The US Soccer Federation is subject to control by FIFA , headquarters in Zurich , Switzerland whose President , Sepp Blatter is no friend of the US .
Thank god I do n't live in South Calinky , or I 'd have to register for sure... probably have to turn in any of my colleagues who did n't .
Maybe the SC legislature can start up its own House Un-American Activities Committee and give the next Nixon a leg up the ladder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's see...  I'm an officially licensed USSF soccer referee.
The US Soccer Federation is subject to control by FIFA, headquarters in Zurich, Switzerland whose President, Sepp Blatter is no friend of the US.
Thank god I don't live in South Calinky, or I'd have to register for sure... probably have to turn in any of my colleagues who didn't.
Maybe the SC legislature can start up its own House Un-American Activities Committee and give the next Nixon a leg up the ladder.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098288</id>
	<title>Up Next: Drug dealers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265895720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>South Carolina will be requiring all drug dealers to get a license next.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>South Carolina will be requiring all drug dealers to get a license next .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>South Carolina will be requiring all drug dealers to get a license next.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099562</id>
	<title>Re:What's wrong with this picture?</title>
	<author>david\_thornley</author>
	<datestamp>1265903760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Ironic; you misread the 8 words you're going on about.
</p><p>
It doesn't just say violent, it says "by force or violence or by other unlawful means."
</p><p>
So, be very, very careful when talking to a lobbyist in South Carolina.  There have got to be laws on lobbying.  If you're in a political organization, make completely sure of the law, because if you talk about, say, putting up a sign of illegal size or going from one rally to another by exceeding the speed limit, you're using unlawful means.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ironic ; you misread the 8 words you 're going on about .
It does n't just say violent , it says " by force or violence or by other unlawful means .
" So , be very , very careful when talking to a lobbyist in South Carolina .
There have got to be laws on lobbying .
If you 're in a political organization , make completely sure of the law , because if you talk about , say , putting up a sign of illegal size or going from one rally to another by exceeding the speed limit , you 're using unlawful means .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Ironic; you misread the 8 words you're going on about.
It doesn't just say violent, it says "by force or violence or by other unlawful means.
"

So, be very, very careful when talking to a lobbyist in South Carolina.
There have got to be laws on lobbying.
If you're in a political organization, make completely sure of the law, because if you talk about, say, putting up a sign of illegal size or going from one rally to another by exceeding the speed limit, you're using unlawful means.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095928</id>
	<title>DOS is the only valid solution</title>
	<author>spasm</author>
	<datestamp>1265047260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Time to flood the idiots with forms filled in with wonderful organization names.  Time to register the TeddyBear's Picnic again: <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/national/police-spying-on-activists-revealed-20081015-51k0.html" title="theage.com.au">http://www.theage.com.au/national/police-spying-on-activists-revealed-20081015-51k0.html</a> [theage.com.au]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Time to flood the idiots with forms filled in with wonderful organization names .
Time to register the TeddyBear 's Picnic again : http : //www.theage.com.au/national/police-spying-on-activists-revealed-20081015-51k0.html [ theage.com.au ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Time to flood the idiots with forms filled in with wonderful organization names.
Time to register the TeddyBear's Picnic again: http://www.theage.com.au/national/police-spying-on-activists-revealed-20081015-51k0.html [theage.com.au]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099800</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>Foolicious</author>
	<datestamp>1265904960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OR<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... if (many more) different people were voting on it than those who originally passed it, perhaps they wouldn't be afraid to get rid of it.<br> <br>  (FYI: This is my passive aggressive call for term limits.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>OR ... if ( many more ) different people were voting on it than those who originally passed it , perhaps they would n't be afraid to get rid of it .
( FYI : This is my passive aggressive call for term limits .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OR ... if (many more) different people were voting on it than those who originally passed it, perhaps they wouldn't be afraid to get rid of it.
(FYI: This is my passive aggressive call for term limits.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100322</id>
	<title>Re:One state down, 49 more to go....</title>
	<author>Tolkien</author>
	<datestamp>1265907180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Americans can never be un-American, they can however redefine it. I'd say this is a win for advocates of censorship, repression and Big Brother.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Americans can never be un-American , they can however redefine it .
I 'd say this is a win for advocates of censorship , repression and Big Brother .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Americans can never be un-American, they can however redefine it.
I'd say this is a win for advocates of censorship, repression and Big Brother.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094658</id>
	<title>I used to use subversive...</title>
	<author>Qubit</author>
	<datestamp>1265037840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But not really any more. Mostly I'm a Git guy now. It's just so much easier. It's just so stupid-easy to use.</p><p>Hope they get on the subversive's case for having that little red book.  Subversive red beans. I heard they even put a bean on the cover, and I know that one. Yup. Shure do. That's the symbol when they're trying to be all racialist on the Mexicans.</p><p>Good thing I don't have to register with the state. Too much trouble, anyhow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But not really any more .
Mostly I 'm a Git guy now .
It 's just so much easier .
It 's just so stupid-easy to use.Hope they get on the subversive 's case for having that little red book .
Subversive red beans .
I heard they even put a bean on the cover , and I know that one .
Yup. Shure do .
That 's the symbol when they 're trying to be all racialist on the Mexicans.Good thing I do n't have to register with the state .
Too much trouble , anyhow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But not really any more.
Mostly I'm a Git guy now.
It's just so much easier.
It's just so stupid-easy to use.Hope they get on the subversive's case for having that little red book.
Subversive red beans.
I heard they even put a bean on the cover, and I know that one.
Yup. Shure do.
That's the symbol when they're trying to be all racialist on the Mexicans.Good thing I don't have to register with the state.
Too much trouble, anyhow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094120</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265034960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...is currently planning on overthrowing the existing government of the United States.</p><p>Have they registered?</p></div><p>... is currently planning on overthrowing the existing ADMINISTRATION.  Fixed that for ya.</p><p>Our government remains the same regardless of which group of idiots is currently in power.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...is currently planning on overthrowing the existing government of the United States.Have they registered ? .. .
is currently planning on overthrowing the existing ADMINISTRATION .
Fixed that for ya.Our government remains the same regardless of which group of idiots is currently in power .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...is currently planning on overthrowing the existing government of the United States.Have they registered?...
is currently planning on overthrowing the existing ADMINISTRATION.
Fixed that for ya.Our government remains the same regardless of which group of idiots is currently in power.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096164</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>NeutronCowboy</author>
	<datestamp>1265049420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd go one further: every law on the books needs to be recertified and brought back for a vote every 10 years. Can't handle the volume? Then focus on the laws that actually matter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd go one further : every law on the books needs to be recertified and brought back for a vote every 10 years .
Ca n't handle the volume ?
Then focus on the laws that actually matter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd go one further: every law on the books needs to be recertified and brought back for a vote every 10 years.
Can't handle the volume?
Then focus on the laws that actually matter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096338</id>
	<title>Who wrote this?</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1265051160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Havelock\_Vetinari" title="wikipedia.org">Havenlock Vetinari</a> [wikipedia.org] for any chance? This law seems to come right from one of Discworld books.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Havenlock Vetinari [ wikipedia.org ] for any chance ?
This law seems to come right from one of Discworld books .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Havenlock Vetinari [wikipedia.org] for any chance?
This law seems to come right from one of Discworld books.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31109816</id>
	<title>Read on. Stop BS</title>
	<author>blue-slonopotam</author>
	<datestamp>1265913180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The terms of this chapter do not apply to any labor union or religious, fraternal or patriotic organization, society or association, or their members, whose objectives and aims do not contemplate the overthrow of the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof <b>by force or violence or other unlawful means</b>.

Otherwise a really stupid law.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The terms of this chapter do not apply to any labor union or religious , fraternal or patriotic organization , society or association , or their members , whose objectives and aims do not contemplate the overthrow of the government of the United States , of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means .
Otherwise a really stupid law .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The terms of this chapter do not apply to any labor union or religious, fraternal or patriotic organization, society or association, or their members, whose objectives and aims do not contemplate the overthrow of the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means.
Otherwise a really stupid law.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093680</id>
	<title>Terrorist Sweepstakes</title>
	<author>Freaky Spook</author>
	<datestamp>1265033040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They could have at least tried a little harder and turned it into a competition</p><p>"Attempt to Subvert the country and WIN!!!! Register with the Secretary of state and enter the draw for a free all expenses paid trip to Cuba, where you get to relax in luxury"</p><p>Who signs up for anything if they don't have any chance of winning anything, or even get anything for free?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They could have at least tried a little harder and turned it into a competition " Attempt to Subvert the country and WIN ! ! ! !
Register with the Secretary of state and enter the draw for a free all expenses paid trip to Cuba , where you get to relax in luxury " Who signs up for anything if they do n't have any chance of winning anything , or even get anything for free ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They could have at least tried a little harder and turned it into a competition"Attempt to Subvert the country and WIN!!!!
Register with the Secretary of state and enter the draw for a free all expenses paid trip to Cuba, where you get to relax in luxury"Who signs up for anything if they don't have any chance of winning anything, or even get anything for free?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096668</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Failed Physicist</author>
	<datestamp>1265919000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>'Subversive organization' means every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof <b>by force or violence or other unlawful means</b></p></div><p>Seems quite broad, no? So many ways to define sets of people, and then say you only need 2. So basically any time you have any kind of relationship with another individual you are suspect.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing [...] any political subdivision [of the U.S.] by force or violence or other unlawful means</p></div><p>A subset of which is</p><p><div class="quote"><p>indirectly advocates [or] advises the propriety of controlling or seizing or overthrowing any political subdivision of the government of the United States by other unlawful means</p></div><p>So basically any citizen in any relationship with another citizen cannot be safe from worry should he mention what he honestly thinks of the established order and what should be done with it. And whatever he legitimately thinks should be done, if the establishment doesn't like it he's fucked because</p><p><div class="quote"><p>by other unlawful means</p></div><p>is a criterion that could probably jail the U.S. population ten times over - and it looks like it'll keep getting worse.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>'Subversive organization ' means every corporation , society , association , camp , group , bund , political party , assembly , body or organization , composed of two or more persons , which directly or indirectly advocates , advises , teaches or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States , of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful meansSeems quite broad , no ?
So many ways to define sets of people , and then say you only need 2 .
So basically any time you have any kind of relationship with another individual you are suspect.two or more persons , which directly or indirectly advocates , advises , teaches or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing [ ... ] any political subdivision [ of the U.S. ] by force or violence or other unlawful meansA subset of which isindirectly advocates [ or ] advises the propriety of controlling or seizing or overthrowing any political subdivision of the government of the United States by other unlawful meansSo basically any citizen in any relationship with another citizen can not be safe from worry should he mention what he honestly thinks of the established order and what should be done with it .
And whatever he legitimately thinks should be done , if the establishment does n't like it he 's fucked becauseby other unlawful meansis a criterion that could probably jail the U.S. population ten times over - and it looks like it 'll keep getting worse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'Subversive organization' means every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful meansSeems quite broad, no?
So many ways to define sets of people, and then say you only need 2.
So basically any time you have any kind of relationship with another individual you are suspect.two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing [...] any political subdivision [of the U.S.] by force or violence or other unlawful meansA subset of which isindirectly advocates [or] advises the propriety of controlling or seizing or overthrowing any political subdivision of the government of the United States by other unlawful meansSo basically any citizen in any relationship with another citizen cannot be safe from worry should he mention what he honestly thinks of the established order and what should be done with it.
And whatever he legitimately thinks should be done, if the establishment doesn't like it he's fucked becauseby other unlawful meansis a criterion that could probably jail the U.S. population ten times over - and it looks like it'll keep getting worse.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095682</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>steelfood</author>
	<datestamp>1265045340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or, it could be a great defense.</p><p>"Your honor, I didn't register as a member of a subversive group, therefore the purpose of my group could not have been to overthrow the government of the United States."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , it could be a great defense .
" Your honor , I did n't register as a member of a subversive group , therefore the purpose of my group could not have been to overthrow the government of the United States .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, it could be a great defense.
"Your honor, I didn't register as a member of a subversive group, therefore the purpose of my group could not have been to overthrow the government of the United States.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095756</id>
	<title>Re:It does seem funny til you learn how law is use</title>
	<author>steelfood</author>
	<datestamp>1265046000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wouldn't many republicans count?</p></div><p>Yeah, all the people flying the confederate flag would have to register.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't many republicans count ? Yeah , all the people flying the confederate flag would have to register .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't many republicans count?Yeah, all the people flying the confederate flag would have to register.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095780</id>
	<title>Clerks</title>
	<author>SoundGuyNoise</author>
	<datestamp>1265046180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you plan to shoplift, please let us know.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you plan to shoplift , please let us know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you plan to shoplift, please let us know.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098206</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>mrxak</author>
	<datestamp>1265894640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have to admit, sunset clauses on all laws does have a certain appeal to it. Laws passed for political reasons of a given era more than an actual need for legislation would be eventually taken off the books. That's a good thing, in my mind. On the other hand, there's probably more laws in place that we'd like to keep indefinitely than you'd expect, and Congress would spend all of their time maintaining those existing laws and never accomplish anything new we want passed. It does have a limiting effect on government, but that's both a good and bad thing at times. A good compromise, I think, would be forcing congress to spend a decent part of their time on repealing old laws we don't need anymore, simplifying old laws, etc. That's not really going to happen though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to admit , sunset clauses on all laws does have a certain appeal to it .
Laws passed for political reasons of a given era more than an actual need for legislation would be eventually taken off the books .
That 's a good thing , in my mind .
On the other hand , there 's probably more laws in place that we 'd like to keep indefinitely than you 'd expect , and Congress would spend all of their time maintaining those existing laws and never accomplish anything new we want passed .
It does have a limiting effect on government , but that 's both a good and bad thing at times .
A good compromise , I think , would be forcing congress to spend a decent part of their time on repealing old laws we do n't need anymore , simplifying old laws , etc .
That 's not really going to happen though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to admit, sunset clauses on all laws does have a certain appeal to it.
Laws passed for political reasons of a given era more than an actual need for legislation would be eventually taken off the books.
That's a good thing, in my mind.
On the other hand, there's probably more laws in place that we'd like to keep indefinitely than you'd expect, and Congress would spend all of their time maintaining those existing laws and never accomplish anything new we want passed.
It does have a limiting effect on government, but that's both a good and bad thing at times.
A good compromise, I think, would be forcing congress to spend a decent part of their time on repealing old laws we don't need anymore, simplifying old laws, etc.
That's not really going to happen though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099702</id>
	<title>Ideas should be allowed to evolve</title>
	<author>Fastfwd</author>
	<datestamp>1265904540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I see a lot of comments about the constitution and what previous great historic figures said or wrote.</p><p>Sure a lot of it is still relevant today but some of it is not. Just like you can believe in god and evolution you should be able to believe that constitutions and laws can and should change. Carefully and only when most people agree.</p><p>Actually it should be when most educated people agree but that's idealist of me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I see a lot of comments about the constitution and what previous great historic figures said or wrote.Sure a lot of it is still relevant today but some of it is not .
Just like you can believe in god and evolution you should be able to believe that constitutions and laws can and should change .
Carefully and only when most people agree.Actually it should be when most educated people agree but that 's idealist of me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see a lot of comments about the constitution and what previous great historic figures said or wrote.Sure a lot of it is still relevant today but some of it is not.
Just like you can believe in god and evolution you should be able to believe that constitutions and laws can and should change.
Carefully and only when most people agree.Actually it should be when most educated people agree but that's idealist of me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095944</id>
	<title>Im pretty offended</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265047440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This article implies that all people who believe in the abolishment of government are in support of terrorism. I for one am an Anarchist, i am also a pacifist, i strongly oppose violent revolution, in my veiw the state must crumble as it becomes obsolete in a better society. I think that can only happen by us creating that society free of class, racism, sexism, homophobia, violence ourselves (which is the nature of Anarchism). WE need to fight hunger and poverty in our community, we need to fight sexism, homophobia and racism within ourselves and our surroundings. Do i sound like a dangerous terrorist to you?
I believe it was that crazy radical revolutionary Thomas Jefferson (who fits the definition to be on this list by the way) who said "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism.", im sure hed be glad to know that we are now making a list of these great patriots and fining and jailing all those who dont sign up.
Anon to avoid having Ayn Rand spewed at me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This article implies that all people who believe in the abolishment of government are in support of terrorism .
I for one am an Anarchist , i am also a pacifist , i strongly oppose violent revolution , in my veiw the state must crumble as it becomes obsolete in a better society .
I think that can only happen by us creating that society free of class , racism , sexism , homophobia , violence ourselves ( which is the nature of Anarchism ) .
WE need to fight hunger and poverty in our community , we need to fight sexism , homophobia and racism within ourselves and our surroundings .
Do i sound like a dangerous terrorist to you ?
I believe it was that crazy radical revolutionary Thomas Jefferson ( who fits the definition to be on this list by the way ) who said " Dissent is the highest form of patriotism .
" , im sure hed be glad to know that we are now making a list of these great patriots and fining and jailing all those who dont sign up .
Anon to avoid having Ayn Rand spewed at me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This article implies that all people who believe in the abolishment of government are in support of terrorism.
I for one am an Anarchist, i am also a pacifist, i strongly oppose violent revolution, in my veiw the state must crumble as it becomes obsolete in a better society.
I think that can only happen by us creating that society free of class, racism, sexism, homophobia, violence ourselves (which is the nature of Anarchism).
WE need to fight hunger and poverty in our community, we need to fight sexism, homophobia and racism within ourselves and our surroundings.
Do i sound like a dangerous terrorist to you?
I believe it was that crazy radical revolutionary Thomas Jefferson (who fits the definition to be on this list by the way) who said "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism.
", im sure hed be glad to know that we are now making a list of these great patriots and fining and jailing all those who dont sign up.
Anon to avoid having Ayn Rand spewed at me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096878</id>
	<title>Re:Easy way to "democratically" jail and fine diss</title>
	<author>RobertM1968</author>
	<datestamp>1265921400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Don't like someone badmouthing the government?  Require them to register.  Then when they (obviously) don't do it, stick 'em in jail and take their money.</p></div><p>badmouthing the government != subversion, since you aren't, you know, actually subverting anything.</p>  </div><p>Hmmm... maybe I should brush up on the Patriot Act - I think it disagrees with you on this.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't like someone badmouthing the government ?
Require them to register .
Then when they ( obviously ) do n't do it , stick 'em in jail and take their money.badmouthing the government ! = subversion , since you are n't , you know , actually subverting anything .
Hmmm... maybe I should brush up on the Patriot Act - I think it disagrees with you on this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't like someone badmouthing the government?
Require them to register.
Then when they (obviously) don't do it, stick 'em in jail and take their money.badmouthing the government != subversion, since you aren't, you know, actually subverting anything.
Hmmm... maybe I should brush up on the Patriot Act - I think it disagrees with you on this.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093812</id>
	<title>Re:Easy way to "democratically" jail and fine diss</title>
	<author>oneplus999</author>
	<datestamp>1265033580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Don't like someone badmouthing the government?  Require them to register.  Then when they (obviously) don't do it, stick 'em in jail and take their money.</p></div><p>badmouthing the government != subversion, since you aren't, you know, actually subverting anything.  not saying the law makes sense or anything, but even if it did include that, first amendment &gt; sc laws, so it wouldn't hold up in court anyway.  try again.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Enjoy your democracy, guys.</p></div><p>thanks i will.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't like someone badmouthing the government ?
Require them to register .
Then when they ( obviously ) do n't do it , stick 'em in jail and take their money.badmouthing the government ! = subversion , since you are n't , you know , actually subverting anything .
not saying the law makes sense or anything , but even if it did include that , first amendment &gt; sc laws , so it would n't hold up in court anyway .
try again.Enjoy your democracy , guys.thanks i will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't like someone badmouthing the government?
Require them to register.
Then when they (obviously) don't do it, stick 'em in jail and take their money.badmouthing the government != subversion, since you aren't, you know, actually subverting anything.
not saying the law makes sense or anything, but even if it did include that, first amendment &gt; sc laws, so it wouldn't hold up in court anyway.
try again.Enjoy your democracy, guys.thanks i will.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097870</id>
	<title>Beware Slashdot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265890020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Combining this with the Patriot Act and the fact that online content can be judged by the standards of the strictest community that is able to access it, you should think twice before conspiring against the good will of the nation and its principles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Combining this with the Patriot Act and the fact that online content can be judged by the standards of the strictest community that is able to access it , you should think twice before conspiring against the good will of the nation and its principles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Combining this with the Patriot Act and the fact that online content can be judged by the standards of the strictest community that is able to access it, you should think twice before conspiring against the good will of the nation and its principles.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097254</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265883120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We: We want a change in government...</p><p>Government: We dont want to and you cant force us.</p><p>Government: BTW I want a lot of things and have a bunch of laws and regulations.  And we have no qualms about forcing you to do things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We : We want a change in government...Government : We dont want to and you cant force us.Government : BTW I want a lot of things and have a bunch of laws and regulations .
And we have no qualms about forcing you to do things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We: We want a change in government...Government: We dont want to and you cant force us.Government: BTW I want a lot of things and have a bunch of laws and regulations.
And we have no qualms about forcing you to do things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097444</id>
	<title>The real purpose...</title>
	<author>SharpFang</author>
	<datestamp>1265885520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is not to gather registrations. It's "we've caught 20 members of a terrorist organization. We pressed charges against 12, we're likely to get another 4 sentenced, but there are these 4 guys about whom we have nothing. They joined recently, didn't get to do anything wrong, didn't participate in the last action, even in planning it, and were generally on their trial period in the organization. There is nothing we can do, we have to let them go."</p><p>This way they can sentence them to 10 years for failure to register with secretary of state... or at least that's what they think.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is not to gather registrations .
It 's " we 've caught 20 members of a terrorist organization .
We pressed charges against 12 , we 're likely to get another 4 sentenced , but there are these 4 guys about whom we have nothing .
They joined recently , did n't get to do anything wrong , did n't participate in the last action , even in planning it , and were generally on their trial period in the organization .
There is nothing we can do , we have to let them go .
" This way they can sentence them to 10 years for failure to register with secretary of state... or at least that 's what they think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is not to gather registrations.
It's "we've caught 20 members of a terrorist organization.
We pressed charges against 12, we're likely to get another 4 sentenced, but there are these 4 guys about whom we have nothing.
They joined recently, didn't get to do anything wrong, didn't participate in the last action, even in planning it, and were generally on their trial period in the organization.
There is nothing we can do, we have to let them go.
"This way they can sentence them to 10 years for failure to register with secretary of state... or at least that's what they think.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098560</id>
	<title>Really.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265898300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This should work as well as gun control does.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This should work as well as gun control does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This should work as well as gun control does.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31101208</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265911740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof <b>by force or violence or other unlawful means;</b>"</p></div><p>So what is "showing up at a townhall meeting armed with a rifle"?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States , of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means ; " So what is " showing up at a townhall meeting armed with a rifle " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means;"So what is "showing up at a townhall meeting armed with a rifle"?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098238</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>bwcbwc</author>
	<datestamp>1265895180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or how about Heinlein's suggestion that one house of the legislature pass laws with a 2/3 majority and one house can repeal laws with a simple majority.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or how about Heinlein 's suggestion that one house of the legislature pass laws with a 2/3 majority and one house can repeal laws with a simple majority .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or how about Heinlein's suggestion that one house of the legislature pass laws with a 2/3 majority and one house can repeal laws with a simple majority.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094938</id>
	<title>Re:What about Confederates?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265039580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It definitely advocates the violent overthrowing of the United States government...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It definitely advocates the violent overthrowing of the United States government.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It definitely advocates the violent overthrowing of the United States government...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093752</id>
	<title>Can we submit a nomination</title>
	<author>wiredlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1265033400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for the South Carolina state legislature?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for the South Carolina state legislature ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for the South Carolina state legislature?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095198</id>
	<title>Shock and Awesome!</title>
	<author>WCVanHorne</author>
	<datestamp>1265041800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now all they need to do is have an insurgent tax, IED levy, and require permits for any terrorist act and our security problems will clear away like second hand smoke.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now all they need to do is have an insurgent tax , IED levy , and require permits for any terrorist act and our security problems will clear away like second hand smoke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now all they need to do is have an insurgent tax, IED levy, and require permits for any terrorist act and our security problems will clear away like second hand smoke.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094566</id>
	<title>April 1st?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265037300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't it a little early for April Fool's Jokes?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't it a little early for April Fool 's Jokes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't it a little early for April Fool's Jokes?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580</id>
	<title>not the first</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265032680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>slashdot requires all first posters to register.</htmltext>
<tokenext>slashdot requires all first posters to register .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>slashdot requires all first posters to register.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094590</id>
	<title>the FBI should be against this law too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265037480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>because driving these groups underground makes it much harder to catch them before they strike</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>because driving these groups underground makes it much harder to catch them before they strike</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because driving these groups underground makes it much harder to catch them before they strike</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31110054</id>
	<title>Missing the point</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265916480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is probably easier to prosecute "failing to register" as a crime, than it is to prosecute for allegedly performing the proscribed activites.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is probably easier to prosecute " failing to register " as a crime , than it is to prosecute for allegedly performing the proscribed activites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is probably easier to prosecute "failing to register" as a crime, than it is to prosecute for allegedly performing the proscribed activites.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093710</id>
	<title>Re:Awwwww crap!</title>
	<author>EricWright</author>
	<datestamp>1265033160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FTFA:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>By "subversive organization," the law means "every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of <i>two or more persons</i></p> </div><p>You'll be just fine if you keep it to yourself.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTFA : By " subversive organization , " the law means " every corporation , society , association , camp , group , bund , political party , assembly , body or organization , composed of two or more persons You 'll be just fine if you keep it to yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTFA:By "subversive organization," the law means "every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons You'll be just fine if you keep it to yourself.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096122</id>
	<title>Bogus Story; Statute from the 1950s</title>
	<author>Artefacto</author>
	<datestamp>1265048820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This statute was actually passed in 1951; actually, there was an attempt to get the law repeated and they got it backwards. See <a href="http://volokh.com/2010/02/10/did-south-carolina-pass-a-subversive-activities-registration-act-last-year/" title="volokh.com" rel="nofollow">http://volokh.com/2010/02/10/did-south-carolina-pass-a-subversive-activities-registration-act-last-year/</a> [volokh.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>This statute was actually passed in 1951 ; actually , there was an attempt to get the law repeated and they got it backwards .
See http : //volokh.com/2010/02/10/did-south-carolina-pass-a-subversive-activities-registration-act-last-year/ [ volokh.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This statute was actually passed in 1951; actually, there was an attempt to get the law repeated and they got it backwards.
See http://volokh.com/2010/02/10/did-south-carolina-pass-a-subversive-activities-registration-act-last-year/ [volokh.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093926</id>
	<title>It does seem funny til you learn how law is used</title>
	<author>cybereal</author>
	<datestamp>1265034060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These sort of laws always seem so ridiculous until you learn how criminal law comes into application in real practice.  Laws like this one enable police organizations to expand their scope of suspicions to an area of law that is less scrutinized that violent crimes.  This type of law is also used to enhance punishments during investigations for the cases where say, the police are pretty sure these guys were planning to do some terrorizing but couldn't prove it but with this law they can show the far more vague notion of being a group with desires for overthrowing gov't. (Wouldn't many republicans count? hehe, anyway...) so they can put them in jail or otherwise limit their freedom of movement and privacy while continuing to investigate and try to prove more malicious actions or intent.</p><p>So the law might seem ridiculous but it's exactly this kind of law that is constantly misused and abused in our legal/police system every day, both for good and bad.</p><p>On a related note, many traffic codes and laws are created for the purpose of enhancing fines and punishments allowable to people who cause accidents.  Consider any traffic law that seems impossible to catch a person breaking, then realize that when that person crashes or causes a crash, any number of such laws can be applied, merely with witness testimony, to enhance fines and so on. For example, many states have had laws for years that require you use your hands for nothing besides driving.  This is classically used to assert fault on, say, a woman doing her make-up while driving or a driver distracted by children.  They just need an eye witness to corroborate for determination of fault.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These sort of laws always seem so ridiculous until you learn how criminal law comes into application in real practice .
Laws like this one enable police organizations to expand their scope of suspicions to an area of law that is less scrutinized that violent crimes .
This type of law is also used to enhance punishments during investigations for the cases where say , the police are pretty sure these guys were planning to do some terrorizing but could n't prove it but with this law they can show the far more vague notion of being a group with desires for overthrowing gov't .
( Would n't many republicans count ?
hehe , anyway... ) so they can put them in jail or otherwise limit their freedom of movement and privacy while continuing to investigate and try to prove more malicious actions or intent.So the law might seem ridiculous but it 's exactly this kind of law that is constantly misused and abused in our legal/police system every day , both for good and bad.On a related note , many traffic codes and laws are created for the purpose of enhancing fines and punishments allowable to people who cause accidents .
Consider any traffic law that seems impossible to catch a person breaking , then realize that when that person crashes or causes a crash , any number of such laws can be applied , merely with witness testimony , to enhance fines and so on .
For example , many states have had laws for years that require you use your hands for nothing besides driving .
This is classically used to assert fault on , say , a woman doing her make-up while driving or a driver distracted by children .
They just need an eye witness to corroborate for determination of fault .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These sort of laws always seem so ridiculous until you learn how criminal law comes into application in real practice.
Laws like this one enable police organizations to expand their scope of suspicions to an area of law that is less scrutinized that violent crimes.
This type of law is also used to enhance punishments during investigations for the cases where say, the police are pretty sure these guys were planning to do some terrorizing but couldn't prove it but with this law they can show the far more vague notion of being a group with desires for overthrowing gov't.
(Wouldn't many republicans count?
hehe, anyway...) so they can put them in jail or otherwise limit their freedom of movement and privacy while continuing to investigate and try to prove more malicious actions or intent.So the law might seem ridiculous but it's exactly this kind of law that is constantly misused and abused in our legal/police system every day, both for good and bad.On a related note, many traffic codes and laws are created for the purpose of enhancing fines and punishments allowable to people who cause accidents.
Consider any traffic law that seems impossible to catch a person breaking, then realize that when that person crashes or causes a crash, any number of such laws can be applied, merely with witness testimony, to enhance fines and so on.
For example, many states have had laws for years that require you use your hands for nothing besides driving.
This is classically used to assert fault on, say, a woman doing her make-up while driving or a driver distracted by children.
They just need an eye witness to corroborate for determination of fault.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098254</id>
	<title>Hello</title>
	<author>TRRosen</author>
	<datestamp>1265895360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hello My name is Thomas Jefferson I'm here to register.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hello My name is Thomas Jefferson I 'm here to register .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hello My name is Thomas Jefferson I'm here to register.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31151506</id>
	<title>I would register</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266247920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I was a citizen of South Carolina I would happily register, I am the "Chief Agent" of the "Legion of Doom" we plan to overthrow the government with cakes, delicious lemon cakes.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/s</p><p>Seriously though, shame the system.  Drag it through the mud in open public view exposing it for the stupidity it truly is.  Spoof it, mock it, make a couple dozen demotivational posters of it, sarcasm is a very effective weapon against governmental stupidity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I was a citizen of South Carolina I would happily register , I am the " Chief Agent " of the " Legion of Doom " we plan to overthrow the government with cakes , delicious lemon cakes .
/sSeriously though , shame the system .
Drag it through the mud in open public view exposing it for the stupidity it truly is .
Spoof it , mock it , make a couple dozen demotivational posters of it , sarcasm is a very effective weapon against governmental stupidity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I was a citizen of South Carolina I would happily register, I am the "Chief Agent" of the "Legion of Doom" we plan to overthrow the government with cakes, delicious lemon cakes.
/sSeriously though, shame the system.
Drag it through the mud in open public view exposing it for the stupidity it truly is.
Spoof it, mock it, make a couple dozen demotivational posters of it, sarcasm is a very effective weapon against governmental stupidity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095208</id>
	<title>Re:Can I mail it in or what?</title>
	<author>CaroKann</author>
	<datestamp>1265041860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder what would happen if you actually did register, even as a joke.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder what would happen if you actually did register , even as a joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder what would happen if you actually did register, even as a joke.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093614</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094066</id>
	<title>Re:Easy way to "democratically" jail and fine diss</title>
	<author>neoform</author>
	<datestamp>1265034720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out&mdash;because I was not a communist;<br>

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out&mdash;because I was not a trade unionist;<br>

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out&mdash;because I was not a Jew;<br>

Then they came for me&mdash;and there was no one left to speak out for me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>First they came for the communists , and I did not speak out    because I was not a communist ; Then they came for the trade unionists , and I did not speak out    because I was not a trade unionist ; Then they came for the Jews , and I did not speak out    because I was not a Jew ; Then they came for me    and there was no one left to speak out for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a communist;

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist;

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew;

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094026</id>
	<title>How about groups wanting to overthrow the SC govt?</title>
	<author>Ellis D. Tripp</author>
	<datestamp>1265034480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like this group of fundie shitheads:</p><p><a href="http://www.christianexodus.com/" title="christianexodus.com">http://www.christianexodus.com/</a> [christianexodus.com]<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian\_Exodus" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian\_Exodus</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like this group of fundie shitheads : http : //www.christianexodus.com/ [ christianexodus.com ] http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian \ _Exodus [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like this group of fundie shitheads:http://www.christianexodus.com/ [christianexodus.com]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian\_Exodus [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094438</id>
	<title>Re:One state down, 49 more to go....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265036340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>body or organization, composed of two or more persons</p></div><p>
I would like to apply.  Do I qualify if I'm schizophrenic?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>body or organization , composed of two or more persons I would like to apply .
Do I qualify if I 'm schizophrenic ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>body or organization, composed of two or more persons
I would like to apply.
Do I qualify if I'm schizophrenic?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098530</id>
	<title>bin Laden captured in South Carolina</title>
	<author>MysteriousPreacher</author>
	<datestamp>1265897880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Osama bin Laden, international terrorist leader, was aprehended this morning when he arrived to purchase his permit to engage in subversive activities. bin Laden had ignored the advice of his fellow henchmen to register in Delaware where insurgency laws are considerably more insurgent-friendly.</p><p>(c) AP</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Osama bin Laden , international terrorist leader , was aprehended this morning when he arrived to purchase his permit to engage in subversive activities .
bin Laden had ignored the advice of his fellow henchmen to register in Delaware where insurgency laws are considerably more insurgent-friendly .
( c ) AP</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Osama bin Laden, international terrorist leader, was aprehended this morning when he arrived to purchase his permit to engage in subversive activities.
bin Laden had ignored the advice of his fellow henchmen to register in Delaware where insurgency laws are considerably more insurgent-friendly.
(c) AP</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098104</id>
	<title>Mod story down</title>
	<author>chazzf</author>
	<datestamp>1265893440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>According to <a href="http://volokh.com/2010/02/10/did-south-carolina-pass-a-subversive-activities-registration-act-last-year/" title="volokh.com">Eugene Volokh</a> [volokh.com], the law was actually passed in 1951, is something of a dead letter, and they're currently trying to repeal it. Sorry to spoil all the hand-wringing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to Eugene Volokh [ volokh.com ] , the law was actually passed in 1951 , is something of a dead letter , and they 're currently trying to repeal it .
Sorry to spoil all the hand-wringing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to Eugene Volokh [volokh.com], the law was actually passed in 1951, is something of a dead letter, and they're currently trying to repeal it.
Sorry to spoil all the hand-wringing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100316</id>
	<title>This is 60 years old!</title>
	<author>coredog64</author>
	<datestamp>1265907180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This was not passed last year.  This was passed in '51 and it mirrors the federal McCarran act of '50:<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarran\_Internal\_Security\_Act" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarran\_Internal\_Security\_Act</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>What probably threw the original poster was the use of "Current through the end of 2009" language on the<br>web accessible version.  Every Title in the collection has the same language.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This was not passed last year .
This was passed in '51 and it mirrors the federal McCarran act of '50 : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarran \ _Internal \ _Security \ _Act [ wikipedia.org ] What probably threw the original poster was the use of " Current through the end of 2009 " language on theweb accessible version .
Every Title in the collection has the same language .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was not passed last year.
This was passed in '51 and it mirrors the federal McCarran act of '50:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarran\_Internal\_Security\_Act [wikipedia.org]What probably threw the original poster was the use of "Current through the end of 2009" language on theweb accessible version.
Every Title in the collection has the same language.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097220</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265882400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, so not every Republican and Democrat, just the ones that did any  (unlawful) spying or unlawful campaign tactics or unlawful campaign funding.</p><p>Is making a political call to someone on the Do Not Call lists unlawful in the US? If so, is it the person placing the call that needs to register, or everyone in the "group" (in this case party).</p><p>Also, don't anti-terror police/security units teach and advise in how to overthrow the US government (sure for training purposes, but still)?</p><p>This is as silly as the green cards us no USians needs to fill in when entering the US stating that we are in fact not terrorists and that we don't intend to commit crimes during our stay...  *sigh*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , so not every Republican and Democrat , just the ones that did any ( unlawful ) spying or unlawful campaign tactics or unlawful campaign funding.Is making a political call to someone on the Do Not Call lists unlawful in the US ?
If so , is it the person placing the call that needs to register , or everyone in the " group " ( in this case party ) .Also , do n't anti-terror police/security units teach and advise in how to overthrow the US government ( sure for training purposes , but still ) ? This is as silly as the green cards us no USians needs to fill in when entering the US stating that we are in fact not terrorists and that we do n't intend to commit crimes during our stay... * sigh *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, so not every Republican and Democrat, just the ones that did any  (unlawful) spying or unlawful campaign tactics or unlawful campaign funding.Is making a political call to someone on the Do Not Call lists unlawful in the US?
If so, is it the person placing the call that needs to register, or everyone in the "group" (in this case party).Also, don't anti-terror police/security units teach and advise in how to overthrow the US government (sure for training purposes, but still)?This is as silly as the green cards us no USians needs to fill in when entering the US stating that we are in fact not terrorists and that we don't intend to commit crimes during our stay...  *sigh*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31110212</id>
	<title>The South Carolina's Secretary of State?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266005400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is a stupid cunt.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is a stupid cunt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is a stupid cunt.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093900</id>
	<title>Re:Register Here!</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1265033940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd be seriously tempted to make up something ridiculous and register; but only if there was some sort of cool plaque I could get for it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd be seriously tempted to make up something ridiculous and register ; but only if there was some sort of cool plaque I could get for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd be seriously tempted to make up something ridiculous and register; but only if there was some sort of cool plaque I could get for it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093654</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094856</id>
	<title>Did the TV stations and parties register already?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1265039160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I mean what is the definition of &ldquo;subversive&rdquo;? &ldquo;Does not conform to party lines, like in China&rdquo;?<br>By my definition, all TV stations and political parties are subversive and perverse. Now what?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean what is the definition of    subversive    ?
   Does not conform to party lines , like in China    ? By my definition , all TV stations and political parties are subversive and perverse .
Now what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean what is the definition of “subversive”?
“Does not conform to party lines, like in China”?By my definition, all TV stations and political parties are subversive and perverse.
Now what?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093674</id>
	<title>Heh.</title>
	<author>headkase</author>
	<datestamp>1265033040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When they come for me, thats a warning to all my friends that it is time to begin truly stockpiling certain materials, not just collecting them<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>When they come for me , thats a warning to all my friends that it is time to begin truly stockpiling certain materials , not just collecting them ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When they come for me, thats a warning to all my friends that it is time to begin truly stockpiling certain materials, not just collecting them ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095312</id>
	<title>It's a Very Handy &amp; Thoughtful Law</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265042580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Brilliant!!</p><p>I wonder if state officials will make it easy for the terrorists to register by having an online registration page?</p><p>And will they run Google Ads encouraging one click sign-ups with the terrorist's Google Mail account?</p><p>Anyone know?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Brilliant !
! I wonder if state officials will make it easy for the terrorists to register by having an online registration page ? And will they run Google Ads encouraging one click sign-ups with the terrorist 's Google Mail account ? Anyone know ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Brilliant!
!I wonder if state officials will make it easy for the terrorists to register by having an online registration page?And will they run Google Ads encouraging one click sign-ups with the terrorist's Google Mail account?Anyone know?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094018</id>
	<title>Re:That seems a bit Unconstitutional.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265034480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is only one law.  Don't irritate anyone with prosecutorial power unless you have access to sufficient legal resources. There are so many laws it's guaranteed they'll be able to find one to charge you with.  Even if they don't you will suffer the equivalent of a large fine via legal fees and days or weeks of imprisonment in a courtroom.</p><p>Past legal decisions seem to have little impact when words like terrorism get thrown around. I think the protesters at the political campaign rallies in 08 would argue that they were effectively prevented from espousing their political views by being locked into barbed wire enclosures.</p><p>Clearly there is no right to associate if illegal actions are being planned  http://www.answers.com/topic/unlawful-assembly</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is only one law .
Do n't irritate anyone with prosecutorial power unless you have access to sufficient legal resources .
There are so many laws it 's guaranteed they 'll be able to find one to charge you with .
Even if they do n't you will suffer the equivalent of a large fine via legal fees and days or weeks of imprisonment in a courtroom.Past legal decisions seem to have little impact when words like terrorism get thrown around .
I think the protesters at the political campaign rallies in 08 would argue that they were effectively prevented from espousing their political views by being locked into barbed wire enclosures.Clearly there is no right to associate if illegal actions are being planned http : //www.answers.com/topic/unlawful-assembly</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is only one law.
Don't irritate anyone with prosecutorial power unless you have access to sufficient legal resources.
There are so many laws it's guaranteed they'll be able to find one to charge you with.
Even if they don't you will suffer the equivalent of a large fine via legal fees and days or weeks of imprisonment in a courtroom.Past legal decisions seem to have little impact when words like terrorism get thrown around.
I think the protesters at the political campaign rallies in 08 would argue that they were effectively prevented from espousing their political views by being locked into barbed wire enclosures.Clearly there is no right to associate if illegal actions are being planned  http://www.answers.com/topic/unlawful-assembly</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094312</id>
	<title>Re:New laws</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265035800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, in the same way that "old idea + internet = patent" we seem to be getting a lot of "existing crime + computer = new crime".<br>
Perhaps the future is to have a whole set of different laws which are applicable to different situations: crime + netbook; crime + laptop; crime + multi-processor desktop machine with at leat 1GB video card memory; or even crime + beowulf cluster.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , in the same way that " old idea + internet = patent " we seem to be getting a lot of " existing crime + computer = new crime " .
Perhaps the future is to have a whole set of different laws which are applicable to different situations : crime + netbook ; crime + laptop ; crime + multi-processor desktop machine with at leat 1GB video card memory ; or even crime + beowulf cluster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, in the same way that "old idea + internet = patent" we seem to be getting a lot of "existing crime + computer = new crime".
Perhaps the future is to have a whole set of different laws which are applicable to different situations: crime + netbook; crime + laptop; crime + multi-processor desktop machine with at leat 1GB video card memory; or even crime + beowulf cluster.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097382</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>Zumbs</author>
	<datestamp>1265884560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Any law which isn't enforced and has no public record of ever having been enforced for a certain period of time, say 20 years or perhaps less, that the law in question simply is null and void.</p></div><p>So, if no one gets murdered for a 21 day period, murder becomes legal? Yes, sorry, but you walked right into that one<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><p><div class="quote"><p>In this particular case with the terrorist registration law, I have my doubts that such a law would ever be proven to be enforced and its only purpose is to expand and exaggerate sentences in an effort to stifle free speech.  Simply asking a state officer to testify in court about how many people actually engaged in registration would be sufficient in this case to show non-enforcement of such a law.</p></div><p>What if this anti-free speech law were enforced? What if dissidents were arrested and put to jail? Or they just had a few people working with the registration? By your suggestion, it would still stand. In my opinion, the problem here is not if the law is enforced or not. The problem is that the law runs against the most basic democratic rights - the right to assemble with your peers, and the right to criticize the powers that be without fear of harassment.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any law which is n't enforced and has no public record of ever having been enforced for a certain period of time , say 20 years or perhaps less , that the law in question simply is null and void.So , if no one gets murdered for a 21 day period , murder becomes legal ?
Yes , sorry , but you walked right into that one ; - ) In this particular case with the terrorist registration law , I have my doubts that such a law would ever be proven to be enforced and its only purpose is to expand and exaggerate sentences in an effort to stifle free speech .
Simply asking a state officer to testify in court about how many people actually engaged in registration would be sufficient in this case to show non-enforcement of such a law.What if this anti-free speech law were enforced ?
What if dissidents were arrested and put to jail ?
Or they just had a few people working with the registration ?
By your suggestion , it would still stand .
In my opinion , the problem here is not if the law is enforced or not .
The problem is that the law runs against the most basic democratic rights - the right to assemble with your peers , and the right to criticize the powers that be without fear of harassment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any law which isn't enforced and has no public record of ever having been enforced for a certain period of time, say 20 years or perhaps less, that the law in question simply is null and void.So, if no one gets murdered for a 21 day period, murder becomes legal?
Yes, sorry, but you walked right into that one ;-)In this particular case with the terrorist registration law, I have my doubts that such a law would ever be proven to be enforced and its only purpose is to expand and exaggerate sentences in an effort to stifle free speech.
Simply asking a state officer to testify in court about how many people actually engaged in registration would be sufficient in this case to show non-enforcement of such a law.What if this anti-free speech law were enforced?
What if dissidents were arrested and put to jail?
Or they just had a few people working with the registration?
By your suggestion, it would still stand.
In my opinion, the problem here is not if the law is enforced or not.
The problem is that the law runs against the most basic democratic rights - the right to assemble with your peers, and the right to criticize the powers that be without fear of harassment.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097582</id>
	<title>South Carolina you say ?</title>
	<author>'Tractor' Barry</author>
	<datestamp>1265887080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmmm... Would this be the same South Carolina that gave the world <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww" title="youtube.com">this delightful young lady</a> [youtube.com] ?</p><p>This seems like an eminently sensible, workable idea to me<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmmm... Would this be the same South Carolina that gave the world this delightful young lady [ youtube.com ] ? This seems like an eminently sensible , workable idea to me : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmmm... Would this be the same South Carolina that gave the world this delightful young lady [youtube.com] ?This seems like an eminently sensible, workable idea to me :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095036</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265040360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...is currently planning on overthrowing the existing government of the United States.</p><p>Have they registered?</p></div><p>They've already picked a name for the new country, USR, United States of Reagan.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...is currently planning on overthrowing the existing government of the United States.Have they registered ? They 've already picked a name for the new country , USR , United States of Reagan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...is currently planning on overthrowing the existing government of the United States.Have they registered?They've already picked a name for the new country, USR, United States of Reagan.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099664</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>citab</author>
	<datestamp>1265904360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This was flagged as funny<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... but it's not.</p><p>It's actually a good defense argument. It's no more "funny" than "If the glove doesn't fit, you must aquit!"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and we know that was very successful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This was flagged as funny ... but it 's not.It 's actually a good defense argument .
It 's no more " funny " than " If the glove does n't fit , you must aquit !
" ... and we know that was very successful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was flagged as funny ... but it's not.It's actually a good defense argument.
It's no more "funny" than "If the glove doesn't fit, you must aquit!
" ... and we know that was very successful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093762</id>
	<title>Also, Bank Robbers must now Register</title>
	<author>KarmaOverDogma</author>
	<datestamp>1265033400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>at the Federal Reserve and declare their intentions, or be subject to stiff fines.</p><p>Furthermore, the IRS would like to remind bank robbers that failure to declare their (illegal) income will result in additional tax penalties.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>at the Federal Reserve and declare their intentions , or be subject to stiff fines.Furthermore , the IRS would like to remind bank robbers that failure to declare their ( illegal ) income will result in additional tax penalties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>at the Federal Reserve and declare their intentions, or be subject to stiff fines.Furthermore, the IRS would like to remind bank robbers that failure to declare their (illegal) income will result in additional tax penalties.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099940</id>
	<title>Declaration of Independence</title>
	<author>realsilly</author>
	<datestamp>1265905500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <a href="http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/index.htm" title="ushistory.org">http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/index.htm</a> [ushistory.org] </p><p>IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776<br>The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America<br>hen in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.</p><p>We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. -- <b>That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, -- That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. -- Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.</b> </p><p>He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.</p><p>He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.</p><p>He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.</p><p>He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.</p><p>He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.</p><p>He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.</p><p>He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.</p><p>He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.</p><p>He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.</p><p>He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/index.htm [ ushistory.org ] IN CONGRESS , JULY 4 , 1776The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of Americahen in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth , the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature 's God entitle them , a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.We hold these truths to be self-evident , that all men are created equal , that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights , that among these are Life , Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness .
-- That to secure these rights , Governments are instituted among Men , deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed , -- That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends , it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it , and to institute new Government , laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form , as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness .
Prudence , indeed , will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes ; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer , while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed .
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations , pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism , it is their right , it is their duty , to throw off such Government , and to provide new Guards for their future security .
-- Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies ; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government .
The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations , all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States .
To prove this , let Facts be submitted to a candid world .
He has refused his Assent to Laws , the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance , unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained ; and when so suspended , he has utterly neglected to attend to them.He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people , unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature , a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual , uncomfortable , and distant from the depository of their Public Records , for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly , for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.He has refused for a long time , after such dissolutions , to cause others to be elected , whereby the Legislative Powers , incapable of Annihilation , have returned to the People at large for their exercise ; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without , and convulsions within.He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States ; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners ; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither , and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices , and the amount and payment of their salaries.He has erected a multitude of New Offices , and sent hither swarms</tokentext>
<sentencetext> http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/index.htm [ushistory.org] IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of Americahen in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
-- That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, -- That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
-- Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.
The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States.
To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094130</id>
	<title>We aren't going to take this!</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1265034960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anarchists, unite!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anarchists , unite !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anarchists, unite!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093854</id>
	<title>Hmmm</title>
	<author>ucblockhead</author>
	<datestamp>1265033700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess I better register the "Make ucblockhead the God-Emperor of the United States" society.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess I better register the " Make ucblockhead the God-Emperor of the United States " society .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess I better register the "Make ucblockhead the God-Emperor of the United States" society.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095874</id>
	<title>Re:Easy way to "democratically" jail and fine diss</title>
	<author>Shark</author>
	<datestamp>1265046960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You have to be planning to overthrow the government by violent or unlawful means.</p></div><p>Okay...  So you want to overthrow the government by non-violent and lawful means.  Therefore, you need to register, because not registering means you are doing so through unlawful means.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You have to be planning to overthrow the government by violent or unlawful means.Okay... So you want to overthrow the government by non-violent and lawful means .
Therefore , you need to register , because not registering means you are doing so through unlawful means .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have to be planning to overthrow the government by violent or unlawful means.Okay...  So you want to overthrow the government by non-violent and lawful means.
Therefore, you need to register, because not registering means you are doing so through unlawful means.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093746</id>
	<title>Osama signing up?</title>
	<author>NicknamesAreStupid</author>
	<datestamp>1265033340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about those Tea Parties too?  ACORN?  Fox News?  Jon Stewart?  The New York Times?  Wall Street Journal?  Of course, the Supreme Court?  And most importantly, is Argentinian agent Mark Sanford gonna sign up?  If he doesn't, Jenny will bust him.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about those Tea Parties too ?
ACORN ? Fox News ?
Jon Stewart ?
The New York Times ?
Wall Street Journal ?
Of course , the Supreme Court ?
And most importantly , is Argentinian agent Mark Sanford gon na sign up ?
If he does n't , Jenny will bust him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about those Tea Parties too?
ACORN?  Fox News?
Jon Stewart?
The New York Times?
Wall Street Journal?
Of course, the Supreme Court?
And most importantly, is Argentinian agent Mark Sanford gonna sign up?
If he doesn't, Jenny will bust him.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094872</id>
	<title>Re:No difference to them</title>
	<author>TheVelvetFlamebait</author>
	<datestamp>1265039220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Any opposition to the present-day government is to be supressed, silenced, destroyed and/or killed.</p></div></blockquote><p>Someone better warn the republican party!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any opposition to the present-day government is to be supressed , silenced , destroyed and/or killed.Someone better warn the republican party !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any opposition to the present-day government is to be supressed, silenced, destroyed and/or killed.Someone better warn the republican party!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093888</id>
	<title>Re:Easy way to "democratically" jail and fine diss</title>
	<author>BitterOak</author>
	<datestamp>1265033880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Don't like someone badmouthing the government?  Require them to register.  Then when they (obviously) don't do it, stick 'em in jail and take their money.</p><p>Enjoy your democracy, guys.</p></div><p>If you read the text of the statute, you'll see that dissent alone isn't covered by this law.  You have to be planning to overthrow the government by violent or unlawful means.  I would imagine this law would be found unconstitutional under Fifth Amendment grounds, as overthrow of the government by violent or other unlawful means is, by definition, unlawful, and the Fifth Amendment protects you from being compelled to make statements which would incriminate yourself.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't like someone badmouthing the government ?
Require them to register .
Then when they ( obviously ) do n't do it , stick 'em in jail and take their money.Enjoy your democracy , guys.If you read the text of the statute , you 'll see that dissent alone is n't covered by this law .
You have to be planning to overthrow the government by violent or unlawful means .
I would imagine this law would be found unconstitutional under Fifth Amendment grounds , as overthrow of the government by violent or other unlawful means is , by definition , unlawful , and the Fifth Amendment protects you from being compelled to make statements which would incriminate yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't like someone badmouthing the government?
Require them to register.
Then when they (obviously) don't do it, stick 'em in jail and take their money.Enjoy your democracy, guys.If you read the text of the statute, you'll see that dissent alone isn't covered by this law.
You have to be planning to overthrow the government by violent or unlawful means.
I would imagine this law would be found unconstitutional under Fifth Amendment grounds, as overthrow of the government by violent or other unlawful means is, by definition, unlawful, and the Fifth Amendment protects you from being compelled to make statements which would incriminate yourself.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095158</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265041440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>RTFB seriously.<br><i><br>Every member of a subversive organization, or an organization subject to foreign control, every foreign agent and every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means, who resides, transacts any business or attempts to influence political action in this State, shall register with the Secretary of State on the forms and at the times prescribed by him.</i></p><p><i>"Subversive organization" means every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or <b>other unlawful means</b>;</i></p><p>Emphasis mine.   You are perfectly within your rights to elect anyone you want to "overthrow" the government, it's lawful.</p><p>On the plus side: I'm sure you could find something the R's or D's are doing that's illegal somewhere in SC at sometime.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>RTFB seriously.Every member of a subversive organization , or an organization subject to foreign control , every foreign agent and every person who advocates , teaches , advises or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States , of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means , who resides , transacts any business or attempts to influence political action in this State , shall register with the Secretary of State on the forms and at the times prescribed by him .
" Subversive organization " means every corporation , society , association , camp , group , bund , political party , assembly , body or organization , composed of two or more persons , which directly or indirectly advocates , advises , teaches or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States , of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means ; Emphasis mine .
You are perfectly within your rights to elect anyone you want to " overthrow " the government , it 's lawful.On the plus side : I 'm sure you could find something the R 's or D 's are doing that 's illegal somewhere in SC at sometime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RTFB seriously.Every member of a subversive organization, or an organization subject to foreign control, every foreign agent and every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means, who resides, transacts any business or attempts to influence political action in this State, shall register with the Secretary of State on the forms and at the times prescribed by him.
"Subversive organization" means every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means;Emphasis mine.
You are perfectly within your rights to elect anyone you want to "overthrow" the government, it's lawful.On the plus side: I'm sure you could find something the R's or D's are doing that's illegal somewhere in SC at sometime.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095636</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>TimSSG</author>
	<datestamp>1265045040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did ACORN register?

Tim S.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did ACORN register ?
Tim S .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did ACORN register?
Tim S.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096250</id>
	<title>Proof positive that...</title>
	<author>rnturn</author>
	<datestamp>1265050380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... South Carolina should have been allowed to secede.  I mean, crimeny, just what are the qualifications for public office in that state? Documentation that you've previously been institutionalized?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... South Carolina should have been allowed to secede .
I mean , crimeny , just what are the qualifications for public office in that state ?
Documentation that you 've previously been institutionalized ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... South Carolina should have been allowed to secede.
I mean, crimeny, just what are the qualifications for public office in that state?
Documentation that you've previously been institutionalized?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095840</id>
	<title>Re:Awwwww crap!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265046660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But he's schizophrenic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But he 's schizophrenic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But he's schizophrenic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096086</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265048400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Enforcing all laws would quickly turn totalitarian.</p><p>Be careful what you wish for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Enforcing all laws would quickly turn totalitarian.Be careful what you wish for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Enforcing all laws would quickly turn totalitarian.Be careful what you wish for.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097650</id>
	<title>Re:Can I register from a distance?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265887620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait your turn.</p><p>The first people who should sign up would have to be the politicians seeking (re)-election. After all, they advocate "controlling and conducting" the government by means of encouraging others to vote for them and other members of their party. They encourage people to donate to their campaigns. By South Carolina's standard, the people who wrote this bill should be first on the list.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait your turn.The first people who should sign up would have to be the politicians seeking ( re ) -election .
After all , they advocate " controlling and conducting " the government by means of encouraging others to vote for them and other members of their party .
They encourage people to donate to their campaigns .
By South Carolina 's standard , the people who wrote this bill should be first on the list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait your turn.The first people who should sign up would have to be the politicians seeking (re)-election.
After all, they advocate "controlling and conducting" the government by means of encouraging others to vote for them and other members of their party.
They encourage people to donate to their campaigns.
By South Carolina's standard, the people who wrote this bill should be first on the list.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31110888</id>
	<title>I would like to register.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265971980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dirac Angestum Gesept.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dirac Angestum Gesept .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dirac Angestum Gesept.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31130634</id>
	<title>Re:Can I register from a distance?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266061800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In soviet Russia, SCOX stock pwnes you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In soviet Russia , SCOX stock pwnes you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In soviet Russia, SCOX stock pwnes you!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094576</id>
	<title>Lowering the burden of proof</title>
	<author>Mr\_Tulip</author>
	<datestamp>1265037420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The intention of this, and many similar laws that have materialized in recent years is to effectively lower the burden of proof for detaining, questioning and ultimately convicting anyone who may or may be planning to 'perform terrorist acts' - an overly broad definition of which actually includes anyone who disagrees with current political thinking.<br>
For example, under standard criminal law, suspects need to have actually performed a crime to be prosecuted. <br> Without an actual crime, there is the lesser charge of 'conspiring' to commit a crime. However, you still need strong evidence that some kind of criminal activity has, or is about to take place. <br> Laws like this one only require someone to publicly oppose the government, and unless they are a registered (in which case they are pretty much screwed anyway - their activities will no doubt be scrutinised), they can be detained without any evidence that they are actually considering doing anything of a crimnal nature. <br> This is, in my opinion anyway, a way of implementing harsh penalties for 'thought crime'. The only effect will be to cause resentment and to drive any non-mainstream political movements underground.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The intention of this , and many similar laws that have materialized in recent years is to effectively lower the burden of proof for detaining , questioning and ultimately convicting anyone who may or may be planning to 'perform terrorist acts ' - an overly broad definition of which actually includes anyone who disagrees with current political thinking .
For example , under standard criminal law , suspects need to have actually performed a crime to be prosecuted .
Without an actual crime , there is the lesser charge of 'conspiring ' to commit a crime .
However , you still need strong evidence that some kind of criminal activity has , or is about to take place .
Laws like this one only require someone to publicly oppose the government , and unless they are a registered ( in which case they are pretty much screwed anyway - their activities will no doubt be scrutinised ) , they can be detained without any evidence that they are actually considering doing anything of a crimnal nature .
This is , in my opinion anyway , a way of implementing harsh penalties for 'thought crime' .
The only effect will be to cause resentment and to drive any non-mainstream political movements underground .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The intention of this, and many similar laws that have materialized in recent years is to effectively lower the burden of proof for detaining, questioning and ultimately convicting anyone who may or may be planning to 'perform terrorist acts' - an overly broad definition of which actually includes anyone who disagrees with current political thinking.
For example, under standard criminal law, suspects need to have actually performed a crime to be prosecuted.
Without an actual crime, there is the lesser charge of 'conspiring' to commit a crime.
However, you still need strong evidence that some kind of criminal activity has, or is about to take place.
Laws like this one only require someone to publicly oppose the government, and unless they are a registered (in which case they are pretty much screwed anyway - their activities will no doubt be scrutinised), they can be detained without any evidence that they are actually considering doing anything of a crimnal nature.
This is, in my opinion anyway, a way of implementing harsh penalties for 'thought crime'.
The only effect will be to cause resentment and to drive any non-mainstream political movements underground.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095684</id>
	<title>Did they ever really consider logic?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265045340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would a group that wants to overthrow the government even register to that government?</p><p>Secondly, would anyone with an IQ over 10 really want to be a part of a group that is actively registering itself as an enemy of the government?</p><p>This sounds like the plot to a bad Saturday morning cartoon show.</p><p>Remember kids it's OK to want to overthrow your government, just so long as you let them know first. And now you know.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would a group that wants to overthrow the government even register to that government ? Secondly , would anyone with an IQ over 10 really want to be a part of a group that is actively registering itself as an enemy of the government ? This sounds like the plot to a bad Saturday morning cartoon show.Remember kids it 's OK to want to overthrow your government , just so long as you let them know first .
And now you know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would a group that wants to overthrow the government even register to that government?Secondly, would anyone with an IQ over 10 really want to be a part of a group that is actively registering itself as an enemy of the government?This sounds like the plot to a bad Saturday morning cartoon show.Remember kids it's OK to want to overthrow your government, just so long as you let them know first.
And now you know.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098066</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265892540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If your definition of "unlawful means" is broad enough to include violations of the Voting Rights Act, he has a point.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If your definition of " unlawful means " is broad enough to include violations of the Voting Rights Act , he has a point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If your definition of "unlawful means" is broad enough to include violations of the Voting Rights Act, he has a point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096628</id>
	<title>What about the **AA?</title>
	<author>seeker\_1us</author>
	<datestamp>1265918640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
What about the RIAA and MPAA?  Or any other lobbying group who tries to buy off legislators?
</p><blockquote><div><p>every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of <b>controlling</b>, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... shall register with the Secretary of State.'" (emphasis added).</p></div>
</blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What about the RIAA and MPAA ?
Or any other lobbying group who tries to buy off legislators ?
every person who advocates , teaches , advises or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States ... shall register with the Secretary of State .
' " ( emphasis added ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
What about the RIAA and MPAA?
Or any other lobbying group who tries to buy off legislators?
every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States ... shall register with the Secretary of State.
'" (emphasis added).

	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095362</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>bsDaemon</author>
	<datestamp>1265043060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It sounds like you might need to register with the SC Secretary of State... let me get the form for you...</htmltext>
<tokenext>It sounds like you might need to register with the SC Secretary of State... let me get the form for you.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It sounds like you might need to register with the SC Secretary of State... let me get the form for you...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094290</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>Rehnberg</author>
	<datestamp>1265035680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do you just walk into their office, say "Hi, I'm a crazy anarchist who's here to destroy your government. Where do I register?" and fill out a form?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you just walk into their office , say " Hi , I 'm a crazy anarchist who 's here to destroy your government .
Where do I register ?
" and fill out a form ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you just walk into their office, say "Hi, I'm a crazy anarchist who's here to destroy your government.
Where do I register?
" and fill out a form?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093618</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>pinkj</author>
	<datestamp>1265032800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does this mean anyone who wants to replace the current leader(s) in government are subjected to this scrutiny?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean anyone who wants to replace the current leader ( s ) in government are subjected to this scrutiny ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean anyone who wants to replace the current leader(s) in government are subjected to this scrutiny?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096868</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>OneMadMuppet</author>
	<datestamp>1265921280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ok. How often does someone get arrested for cannibalism, or necrophilia? After 20 years it becomes legal?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok. How often does someone get arrested for cannibalism , or necrophilia ?
After 20 years it becomes legal ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok. How often does someone get arrested for cannibalism, or necrophilia?
After 20 years it becomes legal?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096356</id>
	<title>As well they should</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265051340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone foolish enough to use software that stores your plain-text passwords for HTTP, HTTPS, svnserve, SSH, and ssh+svn access to a software repository in $HOME/.subversion/auth/* deserves to be forced to register themselves as "too stupid to spell C".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone foolish enough to use software that stores your plain-text passwords for HTTP , HTTPS , svnserve , SSH , and ssh + svn access to a software repository in $ HOME/.subversion/auth/ * deserves to be forced to register themselves as " too stupid to spell C " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone foolish enough to use software that stores your plain-text passwords for HTTP, HTTPS, svnserve, SSH, and ssh+svn access to a software repository in $HOME/.subversion/auth/* deserves to be forced to register themselves as "too stupid to spell C".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095882</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265047020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd say rigging elections qualifies. There should be plenty of documented cases of that in both parties.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd say rigging elections qualifies .
There should be plenty of documented cases of that in both parties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd say rigging elections qualifies.
There should be plenty of documented cases of that in both parties.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31105192</id>
	<title>Re:It's time</title>
	<author>St.Creed</author>
	<datestamp>1265883960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It seems to me that right about the time a government passes such a ridiculous law it's time for it to be overthrown.</p></div><p>It seems to me that right about now, you need to register<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems to me that right about the time a government passes such a ridiculous law it 's time for it to be overthrown.It seems to me that right about now , you need to register : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems to me that right about the time a government passes such a ridiculous law it's time for it to be overthrown.It seems to me that right about now, you need to register :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099122</id>
	<title>Re:That seems a bit Unconstitutional.....</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1265901300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not just paper politics though. Imagine this scenario: Some major political event occurs in Charleston, SC. A bunch of protesters show up - Tea Partiers, left-wingers, anarchists, the usual mix. No big deal, right?</p><p>Well, now one of the anarchists says something that could be construed as advocating the violent overthrow of the US. Now the entire crowd is considered part of the "group", and thus is subject to arrest. The police move in, go all Chicago '68 on them, and arrest them. Now comes the fun part: After a while in jail, the cops drop the charges against the protesters, thus making sure that they will not be tried and can't challenge the unconstitutional law. And then when the protesters who got beaten up by the cops sue the police department, they can claim "we were performing an arrest under this statute, and the protester was resisting" (they nearly always claim in these situations that the protester was resisting regardless of evidence), and since the officer reasonably believed that he was enforcing the law he didn't do anything wrong.</p><p>In short: exercise your right to assemble in SC, get beaten up by cops.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not just paper politics though .
Imagine this scenario : Some major political event occurs in Charleston , SC .
A bunch of protesters show up - Tea Partiers , left-wingers , anarchists , the usual mix .
No big deal , right ? Well , now one of the anarchists says something that could be construed as advocating the violent overthrow of the US .
Now the entire crowd is considered part of the " group " , and thus is subject to arrest .
The police move in , go all Chicago '68 on them , and arrest them .
Now comes the fun part : After a while in jail , the cops drop the charges against the protesters , thus making sure that they will not be tried and ca n't challenge the unconstitutional law .
And then when the protesters who got beaten up by the cops sue the police department , they can claim " we were performing an arrest under this statute , and the protester was resisting " ( they nearly always claim in these situations that the protester was resisting regardless of evidence ) , and since the officer reasonably believed that he was enforcing the law he did n't do anything wrong.In short : exercise your right to assemble in SC , get beaten up by cops .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not just paper politics though.
Imagine this scenario: Some major political event occurs in Charleston, SC.
A bunch of protesters show up - Tea Partiers, left-wingers, anarchists, the usual mix.
No big deal, right?Well, now one of the anarchists says something that could be construed as advocating the violent overthrow of the US.
Now the entire crowd is considered part of the "group", and thus is subject to arrest.
The police move in, go all Chicago '68 on them, and arrest them.
Now comes the fun part: After a while in jail, the cops drop the charges against the protesters, thus making sure that they will not be tried and can't challenge the unconstitutional law.
And then when the protesters who got beaten up by the cops sue the police department, they can claim "we were performing an arrest under this statute, and the protester was resisting" (they nearly always claim in these situations that the protester was resisting regardless of evidence), and since the officer reasonably believed that he was enforcing the law he didn't do anything wrong.In short: exercise your right to assemble in SC, get beaten up by cops.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100456</id>
	<title>United States</title>
	<author>hackus</author>
	<datestamp>1265907720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is of course finished.</p><p>We no longer have a representative government.  85\% OF congress is always re-elected, which really doesn't matter anyway because corporations put people in the places of power from either party.  Your illusion of voting is there to keep the scenery of democracy recognizable so people are kept in line.</p><p>The differences between the two parties are really just to divert attention and amount to very little.</p><p>Some predictions on my part:</p><p>1) More of the US will become like Detroit, Mich.  Mainly looking like a bombed out third world country.</p><p>2) Universities.  Hey this is a prediction: Universities are next on the chopping block.  Over priced, and under powered, American Universities are about to go the way of the do do bird.</p><p>The big "University" crashes will come in the next 5 years as the powers that be (Foreign Banks under direction of the Federal Reserve) finish gutting the financial system of the US.  University campuses will probably be converted to low income housing "projects" developments for the poor, who are growing by leaps and bounds.</p><p>10 Years from now the wealthy will be sending their kids to China to learn Chinese, and to do research or get a job there.  The rest of you poor bastards will end up working in a government job, or out on the streets in the projects where massive unrest will be common.</p><p>The fastest growing job is going to be in the "goon" squads the government hires to keep all of the mass unrest from getting out of control.<br>(Luckily since the demise of the University system, you don't need a degree to be a goon, just naivety and loyalty to the government.)</p><p>So being a government goon wielding a baton is going to be a BIG growth industry.</p><p>3) The US Dollar.  Wow, what a huge crash that one is going to be.  In the next 5-10 years the US dollar will no longer be a reserve currency.  The powers that be won't let it crash all at once of course, they will most likely do a controlled demolition.  (Mainly to protect their own assets in the USA.)</p><p>They already have started the process using deflation so that those on the top have time to sell their US securities at a decent price before the next phase hits.  That will probably come this summer with a huge financial crisis with the banks \_again\_.</p><p>Not sure what excuse they will use this time, last time it was because \_the little people where to blame for borrowing money\_.  My guess is it will be something to do with commercial real estate.</p><p>Doesn't matter really, because all of you poor bastards are going to pay, and YOU WILL PAY whatever the Fed decides it wants for its cronies.</p><p>Each and every American owes 80,000 dollars.  You WILL pay this debt off or your grand kids will...but it WILL be paid.</p><p>The end result will be lots of poor and impoverished people with big rolls of money in their pockets looking into super market windows lusting at all of the food on the shelves, but too poor to buy anything except maybe butter and a little bit of flour.<br>(They won't be breaking those windows because the goons will be out in force on most street corners and businesses.)</p><p>4) Bombs.  Wow this will be a cottage industry.  10 Years from now I see bombs going off all over the place.  Washington DC will be transformed into a fortress with most of the government buildings moved or removed from the public eyes so they can't be hit by "terrorists" (i.e. People who are wondering why they have been robbed by the banks and have decided the political system doesn't work anymore and resort to violence to change it by assassinations on corporate and government leaders.)</p><p>I mean already all 10 heads of the Federal Reserve have private high tech militarys guarding their homes and families.  All of them live in closed gated and heavily defended communities.</p><p>I wonder what they are afraid of?  They couldn't possibly doing something illegal or criminal and are afraid of retribution could they?</p><p>5) Finally, a terrorist attack.  Its going to happen.  Not sure</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is of course finished.We no longer have a representative government .
85 \ % OF congress is always re-elected , which really does n't matter anyway because corporations put people in the places of power from either party .
Your illusion of voting is there to keep the scenery of democracy recognizable so people are kept in line.The differences between the two parties are really just to divert attention and amount to very little.Some predictions on my part : 1 ) More of the US will become like Detroit , Mich. Mainly looking like a bombed out third world country.2 ) Universities .
Hey this is a prediction : Universities are next on the chopping block .
Over priced , and under powered , American Universities are about to go the way of the do do bird.The big " University " crashes will come in the next 5 years as the powers that be ( Foreign Banks under direction of the Federal Reserve ) finish gutting the financial system of the US .
University campuses will probably be converted to low income housing " projects " developments for the poor , who are growing by leaps and bounds.10 Years from now the wealthy will be sending their kids to China to learn Chinese , and to do research or get a job there .
The rest of you poor bastards will end up working in a government job , or out on the streets in the projects where massive unrest will be common.The fastest growing job is going to be in the " goon " squads the government hires to keep all of the mass unrest from getting out of control .
( Luckily since the demise of the University system , you do n't need a degree to be a goon , just naivety and loyalty to the government .
) So being a government goon wielding a baton is going to be a BIG growth industry.3 ) The US Dollar .
Wow , what a huge crash that one is going to be .
In the next 5-10 years the US dollar will no longer be a reserve currency .
The powers that be wo n't let it crash all at once of course , they will most likely do a controlled demolition .
( Mainly to protect their own assets in the USA .
) They already have started the process using deflation so that those on the top have time to sell their US securities at a decent price before the next phase hits .
That will probably come this summer with a huge financial crisis with the banks \ _again \ _.Not sure what excuse they will use this time , last time it was because \ _the little people where to blame for borrowing money \ _ .
My guess is it will be something to do with commercial real estate.Does n't matter really , because all of you poor bastards are going to pay , and YOU WILL PAY whatever the Fed decides it wants for its cronies.Each and every American owes 80,000 dollars .
You WILL pay this debt off or your grand kids will...but it WILL be paid.The end result will be lots of poor and impoverished people with big rolls of money in their pockets looking into super market windows lusting at all of the food on the shelves , but too poor to buy anything except maybe butter and a little bit of flour .
( They wo n't be breaking those windows because the goons will be out in force on most street corners and businesses .
) 4 ) Bombs .
Wow this will be a cottage industry .
10 Years from now I see bombs going off all over the place .
Washington DC will be transformed into a fortress with most of the government buildings moved or removed from the public eyes so they ca n't be hit by " terrorists " ( i.e .
People who are wondering why they have been robbed by the banks and have decided the political system does n't work anymore and resort to violence to change it by assassinations on corporate and government leaders .
) I mean already all 10 heads of the Federal Reserve have private high tech militarys guarding their homes and families .
All of them live in closed gated and heavily defended communities.I wonder what they are afraid of ?
They could n't possibly doing something illegal or criminal and are afraid of retribution could they ? 5 ) Finally , a terrorist attack .
Its going to happen .
Not sure</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is of course finished.We no longer have a representative government.
85\% OF congress is always re-elected, which really doesn't matter anyway because corporations put people in the places of power from either party.
Your illusion of voting is there to keep the scenery of democracy recognizable so people are kept in line.The differences between the two parties are really just to divert attention and amount to very little.Some predictions on my part:1) More of the US will become like Detroit, Mich.  Mainly looking like a bombed out third world country.2) Universities.
Hey this is a prediction: Universities are next on the chopping block.
Over priced, and under powered, American Universities are about to go the way of the do do bird.The big "University" crashes will come in the next 5 years as the powers that be (Foreign Banks under direction of the Federal Reserve) finish gutting the financial system of the US.
University campuses will probably be converted to low income housing "projects" developments for the poor, who are growing by leaps and bounds.10 Years from now the wealthy will be sending their kids to China to learn Chinese, and to do research or get a job there.
The rest of you poor bastards will end up working in a government job, or out on the streets in the projects where massive unrest will be common.The fastest growing job is going to be in the "goon" squads the government hires to keep all of the mass unrest from getting out of control.
(Luckily since the demise of the University system, you don't need a degree to be a goon, just naivety and loyalty to the government.
)So being a government goon wielding a baton is going to be a BIG growth industry.3) The US Dollar.
Wow, what a huge crash that one is going to be.
In the next 5-10 years the US dollar will no longer be a reserve currency.
The powers that be won't let it crash all at once of course, they will most likely do a controlled demolition.
(Mainly to protect their own assets in the USA.
)They already have started the process using deflation so that those on the top have time to sell their US securities at a decent price before the next phase hits.
That will probably come this summer with a huge financial crisis with the banks \_again\_.Not sure what excuse they will use this time, last time it was because \_the little people where to blame for borrowing money\_.
My guess is it will be something to do with commercial real estate.Doesn't matter really, because all of you poor bastards are going to pay, and YOU WILL PAY whatever the Fed decides it wants for its cronies.Each and every American owes 80,000 dollars.
You WILL pay this debt off or your grand kids will...but it WILL be paid.The end result will be lots of poor and impoverished people with big rolls of money in their pockets looking into super market windows lusting at all of the food on the shelves, but too poor to buy anything except maybe butter and a little bit of flour.
(They won't be breaking those windows because the goons will be out in force on most street corners and businesses.
)4) Bombs.
Wow this will be a cottage industry.
10 Years from now I see bombs going off all over the place.
Washington DC will be transformed into a fortress with most of the government buildings moved or removed from the public eyes so they can't be hit by "terrorists" (i.e.
People who are wondering why they have been robbed by the banks and have decided the political system doesn't work anymore and resort to violence to change it by assassinations on corporate and government leaders.
)I mean already all 10 heads of the Federal Reserve have private high tech militarys guarding their homes and families.
All of them live in closed gated and heavily defended communities.I wonder what they are afraid of?
They couldn't possibly doing something illegal or criminal and are afraid of retribution could they?5) Finally, a terrorist attack.
Its going to happen.
Not sure</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094912</id>
	<title>Re:Easy way to "democratically" jail and fine diss</title>
	<author>vrmlguy</author>
	<datestamp>1265039460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would this be covered?  "What country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms."  Sounds like a plan to overthrow by violent means to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would this be covered ?
" What country can preserve its liberties , if its rulers are not warned from time to time that this people preserve the spirit of resistance ?
Let them take arms .
" Sounds like a plan to overthrow by violent means to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would this be covered?
"What country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time that this people preserve the spirit of resistance?
Let them take arms.
"  Sounds like a plan to overthrow by violent means to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31101404</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>gfreeman</author>
	<datestamp>1265912760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The way I see it, the Government is the organisational structure, and the Dems/Reps who take turns having a majority are the administration who controls the government. When you vote, you are not voting in a government, you're voting in an administration.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The way I see it , the Government is the organisational structure , and the Dems/Reps who take turns having a majority are the administration who controls the government .
When you vote , you are not voting in a government , you 're voting in an administration .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The way I see it, the Government is the organisational structure, and the Dems/Reps who take turns having a majority are the administration who controls the government.
When you vote, you are not voting in a government, you're voting in an administration.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31109390</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>DaleSwanson</author>
	<datestamp>1265908140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As I said above laws are currently not read before being passed.  The fact that congressmen opening admit to not reading stuff they pass is mind boggling to me.  At least requiring them to be renewed every couple years would allow some to read it in the mean time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As I said above laws are currently not read before being passed .
The fact that congressmen opening admit to not reading stuff they pass is mind boggling to me .
At least requiring them to be renewed every couple years would allow some to read it in the mean time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I said above laws are currently not read before being passed.
The fact that congressmen opening admit to not reading stuff they pass is mind boggling to me.
At least requiring them to be renewed every couple years would allow some to read it in the mean time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31101506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100082</id>
	<title>Re:It's time</title>
	<author>KiwiCanuck</author>
	<datestamp>1265906220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You have 30 days to report your subversive comment. Afterwards, I'm telling! ~:-) Welcome to 1984. Oh carp! Now I have to register too!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You have 30 days to report your subversive comment .
Afterwards , I 'm telling !
~ : - ) Welcome to 1984 .
Oh carp !
Now I have to register too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have 30 days to report your subversive comment.
Afterwards, I'm telling!
~:-) Welcome to 1984.
Oh carp!
Now I have to register too!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097960</id>
	<title>What about Thomas Jefferson?</title>
	<author>dwiget001</author>
	<datestamp>1265891100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who said: "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."</p><p>If he was alive today, and this would be true of the majority of the USA's founding fathers, if they happened to visit the state of South Carolina, they would certainly be subject to this law. And, our founding father's would describe it as "tyranny".</p><p>Every law maker that voted for this law should be sent to remedial classes on A) the founding of this country and B) the U.S. Constitution.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who said : " The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants .
" If he was alive today , and this would be true of the majority of the USA 's founding fathers , if they happened to visit the state of South Carolina , they would certainly be subject to this law .
And , our founding father 's would describe it as " tyranny " .Every law maker that voted for this law should be sent to remedial classes on A ) the founding of this country and B ) the U.S. Constitution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who said: "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
"If he was alive today, and this would be true of the majority of the USA's founding fathers, if they happened to visit the state of South Carolina, they would certainly be subject to this law.
And, our founding father's would describe it as "tyranny".Every law maker that voted for this law should be sent to remedial classes on A) the founding of this country and B) the U.S. Constitution.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100840</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>Larryish</author>
	<datestamp>1265909640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh wow.</p><p>I am tempted to fill out the form and send it in, for kicks.</p><p>Hmmm... who do I dislike enough to register them as a subversive?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh wow.I am tempted to fill out the form and send it in , for kicks.Hmmm... who do I dislike enough to register them as a subversive ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh wow.I am tempted to fill out the form and send it in, for kicks.Hmmm... who do I dislike enough to register them as a subversive?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094526</id>
	<title>Overly broad much?</title>
	<author>Pfhorrest</author>
	<datestamp>1265036940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>FTFL:<p><div class="quote"><p>"Subversive organization" means every [...] political party [...] which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling [...] the government of the United States.</p> </div><p>So, basically every political party at all, then? 'Cause that's what political parties do: try to control the government. It's sort of what makes them political parties in the first place, no?</p><p>Worse still, given the full text that excerpt is from (emphasis mine):</p><p><div class="quote"><p>"Subversive organization" means <b>every</b> corporation, society, <b>association</b>, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, <b>composed of two or more persons</b>, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States</p></div><p>...any two or more acquaintances supporting the same political candidate (even an independent candidate) or the same policy as each other would qualify as a "subversive organization" under a literal interpretation of this law. So unless you don't know <em>anybody at all</em> who shares the same political opinions as you, congratulations, you're a member of a "subversive organization"!</p><p>On the plus side, I suppose it will strongly encourage people to think differently from each other...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTFL : " Subversive organization " means every [ ... ] political party [ ... ] which directly or indirectly advocates , advises , teaches or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling [ ... ] the government of the United States .
So , basically every political party at all , then ?
'Cause that 's what political parties do : try to control the government .
It 's sort of what makes them political parties in the first place , no ? Worse still , given the full text that excerpt is from ( emphasis mine ) : " Subversive organization " means every corporation , society , association , camp , group , bund , political party , assembly , body or organization , composed of two or more persons , which directly or indirectly advocates , advises , teaches or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States...any two or more acquaintances supporting the same political candidate ( even an independent candidate ) or the same policy as each other would qualify as a " subversive organization " under a literal interpretation of this law .
So unless you do n't know anybody at all who shares the same political opinions as you , congratulations , you 're a member of a " subversive organization " ! On the plus side , I suppose it will strongly encourage people to think differently from each other.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTFL:"Subversive organization" means every [...] political party [...] which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling [...] the government of the United States.
So, basically every political party at all, then?
'Cause that's what political parties do: try to control the government.
It's sort of what makes them political parties in the first place, no?Worse still, given the full text that excerpt is from (emphasis mine):"Subversive organization" means every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States...any two or more acquaintances supporting the same political candidate (even an independent candidate) or the same policy as each other would qualify as a "subversive organization" under a literal interpretation of this law.
So unless you don't know anybody at all who shares the same political opinions as you, congratulations, you're a member of a "subversive organization"!On the plus side, I suppose it will strongly encourage people to think differently from each other...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096348</id>
	<title>Re:It does seem funny til you learn how law is use</title>
	<author>witherstaff</author>
	<datestamp>1265051220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wonder if police in South Carolina will take a hint from <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/02/10/0140245/Appeals-Court-Rules-On-Internet-Obscenity-Standards" title="slashdot.org">Florida and start going after anyone</a> [slashdot.org] who speaks out against government regardless of their location?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wonder if police in South Carolina will take a hint from Florida and start going after anyone [ slashdot.org ] who speaks out against government regardless of their location ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wonder if police in South Carolina will take a hint from Florida and start going after anyone [slashdot.org] who speaks out against government regardless of their location?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097298</id>
	<title>Only 10 Year?</title>
	<author>CisJokey</author>
	<datestamp>1265883600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We here in switzerland are used to put people in Gas Chambers or on the electric chair (maybe a buzzer in native english?) if they do not register. After we drank them...</htmltext>
<tokenext>We here in switzerland are used to put people in Gas Chambers or on the electric chair ( maybe a buzzer in native english ?
) if they do not register .
After we drank them.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We here in switzerland are used to put people in Gas Chambers or on the electric chair (maybe a buzzer in native english?
) if they do not register.
After we drank them...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095602</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>cetialphav</author>
	<datestamp>1265044740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is possible to get laws like this preemptively declared unconstitutional (not the right legal term, I know).  A party that could be affected could go to the Supreme Court and say that this is threatening their first amendment rights without waiting to be prosecuted.  The ACLU will be all over this so it really wouldn't cost the party anything.  The Supreme Court is very sensitive to first amendment restrictions so the case would likely be heard.  It would probably have to work its way through some lower courts first, though.</p><p>There is a more interesting way to fight this in the short term.  Everyone in South Carolina who hates this could register on the grounds that they will vote against the douchebags that came up with this law.  That effectively amounts to a government overthrow, so you want to be safe.  This could result in millions of registrations.  It is hard to imagine that they are prepared for that kind of response.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is possible to get laws like this preemptively declared unconstitutional ( not the right legal term , I know ) .
A party that could be affected could go to the Supreme Court and say that this is threatening their first amendment rights without waiting to be prosecuted .
The ACLU will be all over this so it really would n't cost the party anything .
The Supreme Court is very sensitive to first amendment restrictions so the case would likely be heard .
It would probably have to work its way through some lower courts first , though.There is a more interesting way to fight this in the short term .
Everyone in South Carolina who hates this could register on the grounds that they will vote against the douchebags that came up with this law .
That effectively amounts to a government overthrow , so you want to be safe .
This could result in millions of registrations .
It is hard to imagine that they are prepared for that kind of response .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is possible to get laws like this preemptively declared unconstitutional (not the right legal term, I know).
A party that could be affected could go to the Supreme Court and say that this is threatening their first amendment rights without waiting to be prosecuted.
The ACLU will be all over this so it really wouldn't cost the party anything.
The Supreme Court is very sensitive to first amendment restrictions so the case would likely be heard.
It would probably have to work its way through some lower courts first, though.There is a more interesting way to fight this in the short term.
Everyone in South Carolina who hates this could register on the grounds that they will vote against the douchebags that came up with this law.
That effectively amounts to a government overthrow, so you want to be safe.
This could result in millions of registrations.
It is hard to imagine that they are prepared for that kind of response.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093898</id>
	<title>Re:Easy way to "democratically" jail and fine diss</title>
	<author>elnyka</author>
	<datestamp>1265033880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Don't like someone badmouthing the government?  Require them to register.  Then when they (obviously) don't do it, stick 'em in jail and take their money.</p><p>Enjoy your democracy, guys.</p></div><p>bad mounting the government =/= subversion. </p><p>

In other words... your analogy sucks<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) But that's ok, the whole idea of asking or requiring subversive groups to register not only sucks more, it's fucking ridiculous. It's like asking a criminal to register his intentions to commit a crime.</p><p>

<i>If you are a pedo and want to bang a little child, check the box that says "yes", otherwise check "no".</i> &lt;/facepalm!!(10+1)&gt;</p><p>

I can see where the proponents of this law are coming from, but come the fucking on, it's obvious that it is completely unenforceable.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't like someone badmouthing the government ?
Require them to register .
Then when they ( obviously ) do n't do it , stick 'em in jail and take their money.Enjoy your democracy , guys.bad mounting the government = / = subversion .
In other words... your analogy sucks : ) But that 's ok , the whole idea of asking or requiring subversive groups to register not only sucks more , it 's fucking ridiculous .
It 's like asking a criminal to register his intentions to commit a crime .
If you are a pedo and want to bang a little child , check the box that says " yes " , otherwise check " no " .
I can see where the proponents of this law are coming from , but come the fucking on , it 's obvious that it is completely unenforceable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't like someone badmouthing the government?
Require them to register.
Then when they (obviously) don't do it, stick 'em in jail and take their money.Enjoy your democracy, guys.bad mounting the government =/= subversion.
In other words... your analogy sucks :) But that's ok, the whole idea of asking or requiring subversive groups to register not only sucks more, it's fucking ridiculous.
It's like asking a criminal to register his intentions to commit a crime.
If you are a pedo and want to bang a little child, check the box that says "yes", otherwise check "no".
I can see where the proponents of this law are coming from, but come the fucking on, it's obvious that it is completely unenforceable.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099060</id>
	<title>Has Sarah Palin registered yet?</title>
	<author>technomom</author>
	<datestamp>1265901000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>After all, she called for nothing less than a <a href="http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/761827--sarah-palin-calls-for-revolution-at-tea-party-convention" title="thestar.com">revolution.</a> [thestar.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>After all , she called for nothing less than a revolution .
[ thestar.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After all, she called for nothing less than a revolution.
[thestar.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096952</id>
	<title>Re:Did they just outlaw civics teachers?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265878800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Do they ever even consider running these things past a high school English teacher or equivalent before they put them to a vote?</p><p>Actually, given how crazy this law is, I think that might have intended to outlaw civics teachers...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Do they ever even consider running these things past a high school English teacher or equivalent before they put them to a vote ? Actually , given how crazy this law is , I think that might have intended to outlaw civics teachers.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Do they ever even consider running these things past a high school English teacher or equivalent before they put them to a vote?Actually, given how crazy this law is, I think that might have intended to outlaw civics teachers...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097920</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>bcmm</author>
	<datestamp>1265890560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a nice idea, but there are some laws applied to businesses which are basically never enforced. For example, I doubt anybody has been prosecuted for selling radium-based cure-alls in the past 20 years.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a nice idea , but there are some laws applied to businesses which are basically never enforced .
For example , I doubt anybody has been prosecuted for selling radium-based cure-alls in the past 20 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a nice idea, but there are some laws applied to businesses which are basically never enforced.
For example, I doubt anybody has been prosecuted for selling radium-based cure-alls in the past 20 years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094650</id>
	<title>15 Years...</title>
	<author>malaprohibita</author>
	<datestamp>1265037780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>since I left South Carolina, and I've never looked back.  Charleston, while a beautiful city in many ways, was hellish: the overt racism and classism I experienced still disgust me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>since I left South Carolina , and I 've never looked back .
Charleston , while a beautiful city in many ways , was hellish : the overt racism and classism I experienced still disgust me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>since I left South Carolina, and I've never looked back.
Charleston, while a beautiful city in many ways, was hellish: the overt racism and classism I experienced still disgust me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095660</id>
	<title>Ok, I should get some sleep...</title>
	<author>mds820</author>
	<datestamp>1265045100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I totally misread that as "Subversion groups..."</htmltext>
<tokenext>I totally misread that as " Subversion groups... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I totally misread that as "Subversion groups..."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094866</id>
	<title>Controlling the government?</title>
	<author>fru1tcake</author>
	<datestamp>1265039220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess a whole bunch of corporations that have US senators on their payrolls (officially or not) will have to sign up then?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess a whole bunch of corporations that have US senators on their payrolls ( officially or not ) will have to sign up then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess a whole bunch of corporations that have US senators on their payrolls (officially or not) will have to sign up then?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094158</id>
	<title>Get around this quick.</title>
	<author>Skidborg</author>
	<datestamp>1265035140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So couldn't you just pay your five dollars and create a group that includes every citizen in SC?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So could n't you just pay your five dollars and create a group that includes every citizen in SC ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So couldn't you just pay your five dollars and create a group that includes every citizen in SC?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094354</id>
	<title>Re:Easy way to "democratically" jail and fine diss</title>
	<author>MindlessAutomata</author>
	<datestamp>1265035980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was completely aware of what I posted and I still stand behind it.  It is a particular brand of government badmouthing they are after, the people that want real change and oppose the government absolutely and completely--the truly unpatriotic.  They could care less about people that grumble about traffic fines.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was completely aware of what I posted and I still stand behind it .
It is a particular brand of government badmouthing they are after , the people that want real change and oppose the government absolutely and completely--the truly unpatriotic .
They could care less about people that grumble about traffic fines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was completely aware of what I posted and I still stand behind it.
It is a particular brand of government badmouthing they are after, the people that want real change and oppose the government absolutely and completely--the truly unpatriotic.
They could care less about people that grumble about traffic fines.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093898</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095906</id>
	<title>All criminals</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265047140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All criminals are required prior to committing their criminal acts, must report to the state or federal prison for voluntary incarceration, and upon release from their voluntary incarceration, are required to wear remote sensing devices to ensure rapid capture by authorities following their illegal acts.  Likewise, people expecting to require hospitalisation should report to the hospital, people expecting that they will be struck by lightning should don an anti-lightning suit, etc.  Really though, is this the <b>MOST</b> stupid thing that anyone has ever heard?  Besides being charged with mass murder (and the terrorist might have died in the process), but know that the state of south carolina (aka state of insanity), will be really really ticked, and you will be in violation of one of their statute laws.  Just sayin'.  The only real use for this dumb-ass law is if the terrorist doesn't die, the state can sue his poor ass into the ground.  How many multi-billion dollar terrorists have you seen running around?  Ok, now how many multi-million dollar terrorists?  Ok, how many multi-thousand dollar terrorists?  Ok, how many multi-buck-and-a-quarter with maxed-out-credit-card terrorists have you seen running around?  All rightey then!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All criminals are required prior to committing their criminal acts , must report to the state or federal prison for voluntary incarceration , and upon release from their voluntary incarceration , are required to wear remote sensing devices to ensure rapid capture by authorities following their illegal acts .
Likewise , people expecting to require hospitalisation should report to the hospital , people expecting that they will be struck by lightning should don an anti-lightning suit , etc .
Really though , is this the MOST stupid thing that anyone has ever heard ?
Besides being charged with mass murder ( and the terrorist might have died in the process ) , but know that the state of south carolina ( aka state of insanity ) , will be really really ticked , and you will be in violation of one of their statute laws .
Just sayin' .
The only real use for this dumb-ass law is if the terrorist does n't die , the state can sue his poor ass into the ground .
How many multi-billion dollar terrorists have you seen running around ?
Ok , now how many multi-million dollar terrorists ?
Ok , how many multi-thousand dollar terrorists ?
Ok , how many multi-buck-and-a-quarter with maxed-out-credit-card terrorists have you seen running around ?
All rightey then !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All criminals are required prior to committing their criminal acts, must report to the state or federal prison for voluntary incarceration, and upon release from their voluntary incarceration, are required to wear remote sensing devices to ensure rapid capture by authorities following their illegal acts.
Likewise, people expecting to require hospitalisation should report to the hospital, people expecting that they will be struck by lightning should don an anti-lightning suit, etc.
Really though, is this the MOST stupid thing that anyone has ever heard?
Besides being charged with mass murder (and the terrorist might have died in the process), but know that the state of south carolina (aka state of insanity), will be really really ticked, and you will be in violation of one of their statute laws.
Just sayin'.
The only real use for this dumb-ass law is if the terrorist doesn't die, the state can sue his poor ass into the ground.
How many multi-billion dollar terrorists have you seen running around?
Ok, now how many multi-million dollar terrorists?
Ok, how many multi-thousand dollar terrorists?
Ok, how many multi-buck-and-a-quarter with maxed-out-credit-card terrorists have you seen running around?
All rightey then!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094224</id>
	<title>Smokin' the good stuff!</title>
	<author>vanyel</author>
	<datestamp>1265035440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like South Carolina has changed their primary crop of smoking material...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like South Carolina has changed their primary crop of smoking material.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like South Carolina has changed their primary crop of smoking material...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095396</id>
	<title>The KKK</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265043240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't the Ku Klux Klan count as a subversive organization?  Try and force all the Klan members in South Carolina to register or get fined or jailed.  What about all those right wing militia groups?  Militant anti-abortion groups?  People who want to make the USA a "Christian Nation"?  Somehow I don't think they had all that in mind when they wrote this law.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't the Ku Klux Klan count as a subversive organization ?
Try and force all the Klan members in South Carolina to register or get fined or jailed .
What about all those right wing militia groups ?
Militant anti-abortion groups ?
People who want to make the USA a " Christian Nation " ?
Somehow I do n't think they had all that in mind when they wrote this law .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't the Ku Klux Klan count as a subversive organization?
Try and force all the Klan members in South Carolina to register or get fined or jailed.
What about all those right wing militia groups?
Militant anti-abortion groups?
People who want to make the USA a "Christian Nation"?
Somehow I don't think they had all that in mind when they wrote this law.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096604</id>
	<title>Re:Look Out FOX NEWS</title>
	<author>tg123</author>
	<datestamp>1265054280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This must mean that Bill O Reilly and FOX News must register now as a subversive organization.</p></div><p>Please mod parent up<br>this is insightful</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This must mean that Bill O Reilly and FOX News must register now as a subversive organization.Please mod parent upthis is insightful</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This must mean that Bill O Reilly and FOX News must register now as a subversive organization.Please mod parent upthis is insightful
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093672</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100090</id>
	<title>Re:Awwwww crap!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265906220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The anti-Army slogan: A Subversive of One.  Now to get a million other like-minded "Subversive of One" organizations to agree with me and vote the rat-bastards out!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The anti-Army slogan : A Subversive of One .
Now to get a million other like-minded " Subversive of One " organizations to agree with me and vote the rat-bastards out !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The anti-Army slogan: A Subversive of One.
Now to get a million other like-minded "Subversive of One" organizations to agree with me and vote the rat-bastards out!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097108</id>
	<title>Supreme Court has ruled against that idea</title>
	<author>BradMajors</author>
	<datestamp>1265880420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Supreme Court has already ruled it is perfectly legal to make membership in the Communist party illegal:</p><p><a href="http://www.enotes.com/major-acts-congress/communist-control-act" title="enotes.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.enotes.com/major-acts-congress/communist-control-act</a> [enotes.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Supreme Court has already ruled it is perfectly legal to make membership in the Communist party illegal : http : //www.enotes.com/major-acts-congress/communist-control-act [ enotes.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Supreme Court has already ruled it is perfectly legal to make membership in the Communist party illegal:http://www.enotes.com/major-acts-congress/communist-control-act [enotes.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094422</id>
	<title>Re:Awwwww crap!</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1265036280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Loophole: the law allows legal methods.
</p><p>
According to some conspiracy theorists eg  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Alex Jones</a> [youtube.com]
"New World Order",  CFR, "Trilateral Commission", "Bilderberg Group",  allegedly already have world domination strategies in mind.
</p><p>
(Kind of nuts if you ask me, but hey..)
</p><p>
Anyways....  it would seem if you want to start an international organization who seeks to take over the world,  it would be perfectly legal for people in South Carolina to join, without issue.
</p><p>
As long as your organization's teachings are non-violent and legal. Deception and trickery seems to be perfectly fine.
</p><p>
Using international treaties (ala ACTA) as a way to advance your agenda seem to be perfectly legal safe ways.
</p><p>
In other words... despite the RIAA/MPAA/other major industry organization's obvious attempts  to overthrow the government, or neutralize US sovereignty  over certain matters (through treaties, lobbying, and persusasion of some politicians  through campaign contributions),
<b>none</b> of these acts would require members in South Carolina to register.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Loophole : the law allows legal methods .
According to some conspiracy theorists eg Alex Jones [ youtube.com ] " New World Order " , CFR , " Trilateral Commission " , " Bilderberg Group " , allegedly already have world domination strategies in mind .
( Kind of nuts if you ask me , but hey.. ) Anyways.... it would seem if you want to start an international organization who seeks to take over the world , it would be perfectly legal for people in South Carolina to join , without issue .
As long as your organization 's teachings are non-violent and legal .
Deception and trickery seems to be perfectly fine .
Using international treaties ( ala ACTA ) as a way to advance your agenda seem to be perfectly legal safe ways .
In other words... despite the RIAA/MPAA/other major industry organization 's obvious attempts to overthrow the government , or neutralize US sovereignty over certain matters ( through treaties , lobbying , and persusasion of some politicians through campaign contributions ) , none of these acts would require members in South Carolina to register .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Loophole: the law allows legal methods.
According to some conspiracy theorists eg  Alex Jones [youtube.com]
"New World Order",  CFR, "Trilateral Commission", "Bilderberg Group",  allegedly already have world domination strategies in mind.
(Kind of nuts if you ask me, but hey..)

Anyways....  it would seem if you want to start an international organization who seeks to take over the world,  it would be perfectly legal for people in South Carolina to join, without issue.
As long as your organization's teachings are non-violent and legal.
Deception and trickery seems to be perfectly fine.
Using international treaties (ala ACTA) as a way to advance your agenda seem to be perfectly legal safe ways.
In other words... despite the RIAA/MPAA/other major industry organization's obvious attempts  to overthrow the government, or neutralize US sovereignty  over certain matters (through treaties, lobbying, and persusasion of some politicians  through campaign contributions),
none of these acts would require members in South Carolina to register.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094084</id>
	<title>Re:Murderers, bank robbers, and rapists too.</title>
	<author>Urza9814</author>
	<datestamp>1265034780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>(and inciting the overthrow of the government isn't just simple free speech folks. If you think it is maybe you're so messed up this law will work on you)</p></div><p>\_inciting\_ the overthrow isn't free speech, no. But \_advocating\_ it certainly is. And that's one of the things this law requires registering. And "subversive" is a quite vague word - by some definitions simply saying "Obama is a terrible president" could be considered subversive.</p><p>Reminds me of the many sedition acts we've had here in the U.S. - all of which were eventually ruled unconstitutional.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>( and inciting the overthrow of the government is n't just simple free speech folks .
If you think it is maybe you 're so messed up this law will work on you ) \ _inciting \ _ the overthrow is n't free speech , no .
But \ _advocating \ _ it certainly is .
And that 's one of the things this law requires registering .
And " subversive " is a quite vague word - by some definitions simply saying " Obama is a terrible president " could be considered subversive.Reminds me of the many sedition acts we 've had here in the U.S. - all of which were eventually ruled unconstitutional .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(and inciting the overthrow of the government isn't just simple free speech folks.
If you think it is maybe you're so messed up this law will work on you)\_inciting\_ the overthrow isn't free speech, no.
But \_advocating\_ it certainly is.
And that's one of the things this law requires registering.
And "subversive" is a quite vague word - by some definitions simply saying "Obama is a terrible president" could be considered subversive.Reminds me of the many sedition acts we've had here in the U.S. - all of which were eventually ruled unconstitutional.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31123184</id>
	<title>I'm kinda confused</title>
	<author>multicsfan</author>
	<datestamp>1265985660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does that mean any politician in and from NC would have to register, particularly if they received any money from any foreign source?  How about newspapers with readers outside the US that publish any editorial about changing/making laws?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does that mean any politician in and from NC would have to register , particularly if they received any money from any foreign source ?
How about newspapers with readers outside the US that publish any editorial about changing/making laws ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does that mean any politician in and from NC would have to register, particularly if they received any money from any foreign source?
How about newspapers with readers outside the US that publish any editorial about changing/making laws?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095510</id>
	<title>or other unlawful means</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265044080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>or other unlawful means</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>or other unlawful means</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or other unlawful means</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31103258</id>
	<title>Or other unlawful means...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265919660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only important part of your emphasized portion of the law is "OR OTHER UNLAWFUL MEANS".  This can mean \_anything\_ illegal, including picketing or protesting without a permit.  So, if you and one or more people go protest something, and don't have a permit, you will not only be charged with protesting without a permit, but will also be charged and fined or imprisoned under this law.</p><p>Another interesting aspect of it is that it could be used to put all the members of entire lobbying organizations in jail if they engage in any illegal activities during their practice of "... controlling, conducting<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... the government of the United States..."</p><p>IANAL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only important part of your emphasized portion of the law is " OR OTHER UNLAWFUL MEANS " .
This can mean \ _anything \ _ illegal , including picketing or protesting without a permit .
So , if you and one or more people go protest something , and do n't have a permit , you will not only be charged with protesting without a permit , but will also be charged and fined or imprisoned under this law.Another interesting aspect of it is that it could be used to put all the members of entire lobbying organizations in jail if they engage in any illegal activities during their practice of " ... controlling , conducting ... the government of the United States... " IANAL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only important part of your emphasized portion of the law is "OR OTHER UNLAWFUL MEANS".
This can mean \_anything\_ illegal, including picketing or protesting without a permit.
So, if you and one or more people go protest something, and don't have a permit, you will not only be charged with protesting without a permit, but will also be charged and fined or imprisoned under this law.Another interesting aspect of it is that it could be used to put all the members of entire lobbying organizations in jail if they engage in any illegal activities during their practice of "... controlling, conducting ... the government of the United States..."IANAL</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094346</id>
	<title>Re:That seems a bit Unconstitutional.....</title>
	<author>praksys</author>
	<datestamp>1265035920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All sorts of groups and organisations that engage in politics, <i>within the bounds of the lawful democratic process,</i> are required to provide all manner of information about their goals, membership, and financial resources. So it's a no-brainer that you can require similar information from people who participate in politics outside of those lawful bounds. As long as the registration process is easy enough, and doesn't cost too much, it will pass constitutional muster.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All sorts of groups and organisations that engage in politics , within the bounds of the lawful democratic process , are required to provide all manner of information about their goals , membership , and financial resources .
So it 's a no-brainer that you can require similar information from people who participate in politics outside of those lawful bounds .
As long as the registration process is easy enough , and does n't cost too much , it will pass constitutional muster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All sorts of groups and organisations that engage in politics, within the bounds of the lawful democratic process, are required to provide all manner of information about their goals, membership, and financial resources.
So it's a no-brainer that you can require similar information from people who participate in politics outside of those lawful bounds.
As long as the registration process is easy enough, and doesn't cost too much, it will pass constitutional muster.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094172</id>
	<title>Re:Murderers, bank robbers, and rapists too.</title>
	<author>Demonantis</author>
	<datestamp>1265035140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Worse this condones and accepts the activity. I suspect this law will last all of five seconds in a court room because it suggests an acceptance of people committing other felonies. It is like the pot tax as it meant that the government recognized the people growing it if they paid the tax. It is nice to know that they are supporting the right to a government for and by the people by supporting the people to hold their government accountable, but I doubt that was their intention.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Worse this condones and accepts the activity .
I suspect this law will last all of five seconds in a court room because it suggests an acceptance of people committing other felonies .
It is like the pot tax as it meant that the government recognized the people growing it if they paid the tax .
It is nice to know that they are supporting the right to a government for and by the people by supporting the people to hold their government accountable , but I doubt that was their intention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Worse this condones and accepts the activity.
I suspect this law will last all of five seconds in a court room because it suggests an acceptance of people committing other felonies.
It is like the pot tax as it meant that the government recognized the people growing it if they paid the tax.
It is nice to know that they are supporting the right to a government for and by the people by supporting the people to hold their government accountable, but I doubt that was their intention.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096584</id>
	<title>Re:What's wrong with this picture?</title>
	<author>bit9</author>
	<datestamp>1265054040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm no idiot. I read TFA, but it turns out TFA conveniently left off the last bit about violent means. So, at the worst, I'm guilty of trusting TFA to have adequately summed up the law's actual text. And don't give me any crap about not reading the entire text of the law unless you can honestly say you've read the entire text of every single ballot measure you've ever voted on in your life. This hardly places me in the "idiot" category, although you clearly have some ugly personality issues, going off calling someone an idiot when you could have just calmly pointed out the error.</p><p>Regardless of whether or not the law only covers overthrow of the government by violent means, it's an incredibly stupid law. It should be clear to any reasonable person that nobody is going to actually register with the state. The lawmakers must have known this, so what were they really trying to accomplish? Seems pretty obvious to me their true intent is to ban the existence of such groups, but they can't do it directly as that would be a pretty clear violation of the First Amendment. So instead of banning such groups outright, they're just trying to bully these groups into submission. How is that bullying, you ask? Well, any such group now has two choices: stop advocating (i.e., give up their right to free speech), or face intense scrutiny by all manner of local/state/federal agencies, J. Edgar Hoover style. [I'm not suggesting that the government shouldn't keep a close eye on potential threats, but I don't think that justifies any and all manner of bullying and harassment, which is what I suspect any group that registers with the state will be subjected to.]</p><p>I don't feel particularly sympathetic to groups who advocate the violent overthrow of the government, mind you, but the government's clear disregard for our basic human rights (including free speech) scares me WAY more than some wannabe revolutionaries.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm no idiot .
I read TFA , but it turns out TFA conveniently left off the last bit about violent means .
So , at the worst , I 'm guilty of trusting TFA to have adequately summed up the law 's actual text .
And do n't give me any crap about not reading the entire text of the law unless you can honestly say you 've read the entire text of every single ballot measure you 've ever voted on in your life .
This hardly places me in the " idiot " category , although you clearly have some ugly personality issues , going off calling someone an idiot when you could have just calmly pointed out the error.Regardless of whether or not the law only covers overthrow of the government by violent means , it 's an incredibly stupid law .
It should be clear to any reasonable person that nobody is going to actually register with the state .
The lawmakers must have known this , so what were they really trying to accomplish ?
Seems pretty obvious to me their true intent is to ban the existence of such groups , but they ca n't do it directly as that would be a pretty clear violation of the First Amendment .
So instead of banning such groups outright , they 're just trying to bully these groups into submission .
How is that bullying , you ask ?
Well , any such group now has two choices : stop advocating ( i.e. , give up their right to free speech ) , or face intense scrutiny by all manner of local/state/federal agencies , J. Edgar Hoover style .
[ I 'm not suggesting that the government should n't keep a close eye on potential threats , but I do n't think that justifies any and all manner of bullying and harassment , which is what I suspect any group that registers with the state will be subjected to .
] I do n't feel particularly sympathetic to groups who advocate the violent overthrow of the government , mind you , but the government 's clear disregard for our basic human rights ( including free speech ) scares me WAY more than some wannabe revolutionaries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm no idiot.
I read TFA, but it turns out TFA conveniently left off the last bit about violent means.
So, at the worst, I'm guilty of trusting TFA to have adequately summed up the law's actual text.
And don't give me any crap about not reading the entire text of the law unless you can honestly say you've read the entire text of every single ballot measure you've ever voted on in your life.
This hardly places me in the "idiot" category, although you clearly have some ugly personality issues, going off calling someone an idiot when you could have just calmly pointed out the error.Regardless of whether or not the law only covers overthrow of the government by violent means, it's an incredibly stupid law.
It should be clear to any reasonable person that nobody is going to actually register with the state.
The lawmakers must have known this, so what were they really trying to accomplish?
Seems pretty obvious to me their true intent is to ban the existence of such groups, but they can't do it directly as that would be a pretty clear violation of the First Amendment.
So instead of banning such groups outright, they're just trying to bully these groups into submission.
How is that bullying, you ask?
Well, any such group now has two choices: stop advocating (i.e., give up their right to free speech), or face intense scrutiny by all manner of local/state/federal agencies, J. Edgar Hoover style.
[I'm not suggesting that the government shouldn't keep a close eye on potential threats, but I don't think that justifies any and all manner of bullying and harassment, which is what I suspect any group that registers with the state will be subjected to.
]I don't feel particularly sympathetic to groups who advocate the violent overthrow of the government, mind you, but the government's clear disregard for our basic human rights (including free speech) scares me WAY more than some wannabe revolutionaries.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097114</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265880420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>by force or violence or <b>other unlawful means;</b>"</p></div><p>Is bribing considered unlawful?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>by force or violence or other unlawful means ; " Is bribing considered unlawful ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>by force or violence or other unlawful means;"Is bribing considered unlawful?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097164</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>Vahokif</author>
	<datestamp>1265881260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Then they would start enforcing all the laws you mentioned just so they could continue to exist.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Then they would start enforcing all the laws you mentioned just so they could continue to exist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then they would start enforcing all the laws you mentioned just so they could continue to exist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31109328</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>mabhatter654</author>
	<datestamp>1265907240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the new wave of McCarthyism! They can retroactively claim Linux is a "subversive" organization... it was started by a Finn after all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the new wave of McCarthyism !
They can retroactively claim Linux is a " subversive " organization... it was started by a Finn after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the new wave of McCarthyism!
They can retroactively claim Linux is a "subversive" organization... it was started by a Finn after all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098770</id>
	<title>That's Acts, not laws.</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1265899680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's Acts, not laws. The problem is that each "one" of those Acts may bundle up large numbers of laws, often including entirely unrelated laws. E.g., the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 has stuff about coroners as you might expect, but hidden in there is a law that criminalises possession of all (non-realistic) pr0n depictions of under-18s (i.e., joke images of the Simpsons, as in the Austrialian case), along with all sorts of other laws.</p><p>Now sure, there is the question of how we count, and decide what's a different law, but going by the number of Acts is a particularly poor measure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's Acts , not laws .
The problem is that each " one " of those Acts may bundle up large numbers of laws , often including entirely unrelated laws .
E.g. , the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 has stuff about coroners as you might expect , but hidden in there is a law that criminalises possession of all ( non-realistic ) pr0n depictions of under-18s ( i.e. , joke images of the Simpsons , as in the Austrialian case ) , along with all sorts of other laws.Now sure , there is the question of how we count , and decide what 's a different law , but going by the number of Acts is a particularly poor measure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's Acts, not laws.
The problem is that each "one" of those Acts may bundle up large numbers of laws, often including entirely unrelated laws.
E.g., the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 has stuff about coroners as you might expect, but hidden in there is a law that criminalises possession of all (non-realistic) pr0n depictions of under-18s (i.e., joke images of the Simpsons, as in the Austrialian case), along with all sorts of other laws.Now sure, there is the question of how we count, and decide what's a different law, but going by the number of Acts is a particularly poor measure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093764</id>
	<title>Re:Can I mail it in or what?</title>
	<author>sakdoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1265033400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do I have to register individually, or am I covered by the slashdot site licence?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do I have to register individually , or am I covered by the slashdot site licence ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do I have to register individually, or am I covered by the slashdot site licence?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093614</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094774</id>
	<title>Government by the people</title>
	<author>gfunicus</author>
	<datestamp>1265038680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>so it would follow, by exercising a citizen's right to vote, all conspire to control the government.  Therefore all should register with the Secretary of State.

or is that not what they meant?</htmltext>
<tokenext>so it would follow , by exercising a citizen 's right to vote , all conspire to control the government .
Therefore all should register with the Secretary of State .
or is that not what they meant ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so it would follow, by exercising a citizen's right to vote, all conspire to control the government.
Therefore all should register with the Secretary of State.
or is that not what they meant?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31101506</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>SatanMat</author>
	<datestamp>1265913240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As far as all laws having Sunset clauses, I believe I've heard Penn (and teller) discuss that.  He was wondering about the panic that would set in when the law outlawing murder expired and lawmakers would have to scramble to fit it...<br> <br>

Another thought was that it would make Lawmakers concentrate so much on passing good laws that the crap ones would wither and die and never get renewed.
<br> <br>
of course in reality I think you'd see something like these 5000 page omnibus bills getting passed where noone ever read the whole thing, that would be filled with all kinds of BS...</htmltext>
<tokenext>As far as all laws having Sunset clauses , I believe I 've heard Penn ( and teller ) discuss that .
He was wondering about the panic that would set in when the law outlawing murder expired and lawmakers would have to scramble to fit it.. . Another thought was that it would make Lawmakers concentrate so much on passing good laws that the crap ones would wither and die and never get renewed .
of course in reality I think you 'd see something like these 5000 page omnibus bills getting passed where noone ever read the whole thing , that would be filled with all kinds of BS.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As far as all laws having Sunset clauses, I believe I've heard Penn (and teller) discuss that.
He was wondering about the panic that would set in when the law outlawing murder expired and lawmakers would have to scramble to fit it... 

Another thought was that it would make Lawmakers concentrate so much on passing good laws that the crap ones would wither and die and never get renewed.
of course in reality I think you'd see something like these 5000 page omnibus bills getting passed where noone ever read the whole thing, that would be filled with all kinds of BS...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094274</id>
	<title>Already declared unconstitutional by Yates v. US.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265035620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These laws were declared unconstitutional by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yates\_v.\_United\_States" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Yates v. US. </a> [wikipedia.org].</p><p>Under Yates, teaching and advocating violent overthrow of the government is protected speech.  Only actually doing it can be punished, when it presents a "clear and present danger.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These laws were declared unconstitutional by Yates v. US. [ wikipedia.org ] .Under Yates , teaching and advocating violent overthrow of the government is protected speech .
Only actually doing it can be punished , when it presents a " clear and present danger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These laws were declared unconstitutional by Yates v. US.  [wikipedia.org].Under Yates, teaching and advocating violent overthrow of the government is protected speech.
Only actually doing it can be punished, when it presents a "clear and present danger.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094414</id>
	<title>damn you sc</title>
	<author>someones1</author>
	<datestamp>1265036220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Christ almighty, what is wrong with my state?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Christ almighty , what is wrong with my state ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Christ almighty, what is wrong with my state?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095174</id>
	<title>Subject</title>
	<author>Legion303</author>
	<datestamp>1265041680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What I've seen of Raw Story tells me it's about as newsworthy as Weekly World News, or Slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I 've seen of Raw Story tells me it 's about as newsworthy as Weekly World News , or Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I've seen of Raw Story tells me it's about as newsworthy as Weekly World News, or Slashdot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095126</id>
	<title>Talk about getting RED LISTED</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265041200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here we go, the easy way to get Red Listed...<br>I wonder how the Militias in South Carolina like this crap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here we go , the easy way to get Red Listed...I wonder how the Militias in South Carolina like this crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here we go, the easy way to get Red Listed...I wonder how the Militias in South Carolina like this crap.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094076</id>
	<title>You mean you can become a subversive for only $5?</title>
	<author>voss</author>
	<datestamp>1265034720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How awesome is that! Lets all go register!</p><p>It used to be you have to have a following buy guns or spend years spewing wacky ideas<br>Now you can just fill out a form and pay $5.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How awesome is that !
Lets all go register ! It used to be you have to have a following buy guns or spend years spewing wacky ideasNow you can just fill out a form and pay $ 5 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How awesome is that!
Lets all go register!It used to be you have to have a following buy guns or spend years spewing wacky ideasNow you can just fill out a form and pay $5.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099900</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Foolicious</author>
	<datestamp>1265905320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You forgot to say something about the military industrial complex....</htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot to say something about the military industrial complex... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot to say something about the military industrial complex....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093742</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099154</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>fredklein</author>
	<datestamp>1265901480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, I believe it was that a second House could repeal laws with a 1/3 minority. I mean if 1 out of every 3 people doesn't want the law....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I believe it was that a second House could repeal laws with a 1/3 minority .
I mean if 1 out of every 3 people does n't want the law... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I believe it was that a second House could repeal laws with a 1/3 minority.
I mean if 1 out of every 3 people doesn't want the law....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094232</id>
	<title>That's Me</title>
	<author>dcollins</author>
	<datestamp>1265035440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I "advocate conducting the government of the United States". So I guess that qualifies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I " advocate conducting the government of the United States " .
So I guess that qualifies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I "advocate conducting the government of the United States".
So I guess that qualifies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094200</id>
	<title>They can kill you....</title>
	<author>ishmalius</author>
	<datestamp>1265035260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But they can't eat you.  That's illegal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But they ca n't eat you .
That 's illegal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But they can't eat you.
That's illegal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094766</id>
	<title>Can I register from a distance?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265038620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I live in Nebraska, but I'd like to register anyway. I have advocated "controlling and conducting" the government by means of encouraging others to vote for the candidates I like and by donating time and money to their campaigns. By South Carolina's standard, I'm a subversive. Would I get a registration form I could hang on my wall next to my college diploma, a share of SCOX stock, and a Church of the SubGenius ordination certificate?</p><p>Actually, I'm kind of serious about that. In a dream world, I'd like to see a few hundred million people register as South Carolina subversives.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in Nebraska , but I 'd like to register anyway .
I have advocated " controlling and conducting " the government by means of encouraging others to vote for the candidates I like and by donating time and money to their campaigns .
By South Carolina 's standard , I 'm a subversive .
Would I get a registration form I could hang on my wall next to my college diploma , a share of SCOX stock , and a Church of the SubGenius ordination certificate ? Actually , I 'm kind of serious about that .
In a dream world , I 'd like to see a few hundred million people register as South Carolina subversives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in Nebraska, but I'd like to register anyway.
I have advocated "controlling and conducting" the government by means of encouraging others to vote for the candidates I like and by donating time and money to their campaigns.
By South Carolina's standard, I'm a subversive.
Would I get a registration form I could hang on my wall next to my college diploma, a share of SCOX stock, and a Church of the SubGenius ordination certificate?Actually, I'm kind of serious about that.
In a dream world, I'd like to see a few hundred million people register as South Carolina subversives.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093780</id>
	<title>Well...</title>
	<author>abroadwin</author>
	<datestamp>1265033460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure is a good thing they'll have this registry to track down everyone who doesn't comply! Oh wait...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure is a good thing they 'll have this registry to track down everyone who does n't comply !
Oh wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure is a good thing they'll have this registry to track down everyone who doesn't comply!
Oh wait...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095456</id>
	<title>George Soros</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265043600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any chance George Soros would count as a foreign organization plotting the overthrow of the US Gov't?</p><p>Just a thought...</p><p>Any reason to think this would withstand a constitutional challenge?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any chance George Soros would count as a foreign organization plotting the overthrow of the US Gov't ? Just a thought...Any reason to think this would withstand a constitutional challenge ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any chance George Soros would count as a foreign organization plotting the overthrow of the US Gov't?Just a thought...Any reason to think this would withstand a constitutional challenge?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094972</id>
	<title>What about the NWO?</title>
	<author>hessian</author>
	<datestamp>1265039940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do I have to register to overthrow the NWO?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do I have to register to overthrow the NWO ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do I have to register to overthrow the NWO?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093910</id>
	<title>Problem solved!</title>
	<author>judolphin</author>
	<datestamp>1265033940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thanks, South Carolina!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks , South Carolina !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks, South Carolina!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093936</id>
	<title>Everyone should register</title>
	<author>beadwindow</author>
	<datestamp>1265034060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>well everyone should register isn't the right to vote a method of overthrowing the government.</htmltext>
<tokenext>well everyone should register is n't the right to vote a method of overthrowing the government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well everyone should register isn't the right to vote a method of overthrowing the government.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094322</id>
	<title>Fark will need an addition</title>
	<author>cvtan</author>
	<datestamp>1265035860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fark will now need a "South Carolina" tag to go with the "Florida" tag.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fark will now need a " South Carolina " tag to go with the " Florida " tag .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fark will now need a "South Carolina" tag to go with the "Florida" tag.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093772</id>
	<title>So, do we get immunity?</title>
	<author>BitterOak</author>
	<datestamp>1265033460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does this mean if my group registers with the state and we state our intentions to commit terrorist acts that we will be immune from prosecution when we carry out our intentions?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean if my group registers with the state and we state our intentions to commit terrorist acts that we will be immune from prosecution when we carry out our intentions ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean if my group registers with the state and we state our intentions to commit terrorist acts that we will be immune from prosecution when we carry out our intentions?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094510</id>
	<title>YOU LIE!!!!!</title>
	<author>ACKyushu</author>
	<datestamp>1265036820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if "Let's take our country back" South Carolina Congressman Joe Wilson will be signing himself up? He not only fits the description, he is also taking money from people who do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if " Let 's take our country back " South Carolina Congressman Joe Wilson will be signing himself up ?
He not only fits the description , he is also taking money from people who do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if "Let's take our country back" South Carolina Congressman Joe Wilson will be signing himself up?
He not only fits the description, he is also taking money from people who do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094292</id>
	<title>I have guns, computers, and beer....</title>
	<author>NullProg</author>
	<datestamp>1265035680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everyday I teach my young sons about life, liberty, and property rights. The pursuit of happiness comes when the government is not meddling with your life and making it worse.</p><p>The trouble is, I have no ammo for my guns since Obama has taken office. No 9mm, No 30.06 shells. Black powder to make your own is scarce. I guess I can throw my beer cans at the government when its time to overthrow it.</p><p>To all South Carolinians, the invasion from Florida will commence as soon as I can load my beer cans into my truck and overthrow your government from the south. In the mean time you can overthrow the government of Florida from the North. Charlie Christ will surrender to your whims when you stimulate him.</p><p>PS: How in the hell does the LA/NY/CHI/MIA gangs get their ammunition when I can't get any?</p><p>Enjoy,</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyday I teach my young sons about life , liberty , and property rights .
The pursuit of happiness comes when the government is not meddling with your life and making it worse.The trouble is , I have no ammo for my guns since Obama has taken office .
No 9mm , No 30.06 shells .
Black powder to make your own is scarce .
I guess I can throw my beer cans at the government when its time to overthrow it.To all South Carolinians , the invasion from Florida will commence as soon as I can load my beer cans into my truck and overthrow your government from the south .
In the mean time you can overthrow the government of Florida from the North .
Charlie Christ will surrender to your whims when you stimulate him.PS : How in the hell does the LA/NY/CHI/MIA gangs get their ammunition when I ca n't get any ? Enjoy,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyday I teach my young sons about life, liberty, and property rights.
The pursuit of happiness comes when the government is not meddling with your life and making it worse.The trouble is, I have no ammo for my guns since Obama has taken office.
No 9mm, No 30.06 shells.
Black powder to make your own is scarce.
I guess I can throw my beer cans at the government when its time to overthrow it.To all South Carolinians, the invasion from Florida will commence as soon as I can load my beer cans into my truck and overthrow your government from the south.
In the mean time you can overthrow the government of Florida from the North.
Charlie Christ will surrender to your whims when you stimulate him.PS: How in the hell does the LA/NY/CHI/MIA gangs get their ammunition when I can't get any?Enjoy,</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093864</id>
	<title>Cant' beat them, join them???</title>
	<author>rafter\_hopper</author>
	<datestamp>1265033760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They trying some thing again??
I thought Presedent Lincoln took care of that a few years back...</htmltext>
<tokenext>They trying some thing again ? ?
I thought Presedent Lincoln took care of that a few years back.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They trying some thing again??
I thought Presedent Lincoln took care of that a few years back...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096228</id>
	<title>Tea Party?</title>
	<author>kurt555gs</author>
	<datestamp>1265050020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That buch is always spewing anti government nonsense. Or, does the Bill say it's ok if Fox News likes them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That buch is always spewing anti government nonsense .
Or , does the Bill say it 's ok if Fox News likes them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That buch is always spewing anti government nonsense.
Or, does the Bill say it's ok if Fox News likes them?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31109684</id>
	<title>Applies to all politicians</title>
	<author>kmoser</author>
	<datestamp>1265911620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't every politician running for office attempting to seize control of the government?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't every politician running for office attempting to seize control of the government ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't every politician running for office attempting to seize control of the government?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740</id>
	<title>First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>headkase</author>
	<datestamp>1265038440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about something like this (feel free to democratically suggest improvements or point out issues): When a law finally makes it's way through all the courts and the Supreme Court finds it unconstitutional how about putting *every single last bastard* who voted for it on trial for treason?  The Supreme Court could decide if it was an obvious case which would make it more difficult to get out of, an hysteria case which would allow reparations to more easily flow, or a subtle case which a voter could get out of with a slap on the wrist simply by admitting their stupidity.  Seriously, a little bit of responsibility?  I know politicians hate that word when applied to *them*, but come on: throwing insult after insult at the wall knowing that a few of them will stick is the antithesis of what I thought the USA was.  It you are going to, as a politician, betray the blood spilled by countless of your ancestors for the freedom you enjoy, well, I'd like to see yours spilled in return.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about something like this ( feel free to democratically suggest improvements or point out issues ) : When a law finally makes it 's way through all the courts and the Supreme Court finds it unconstitutional how about putting * every single last bastard * who voted for it on trial for treason ?
The Supreme Court could decide if it was an obvious case which would make it more difficult to get out of , an hysteria case which would allow reparations to more easily flow , or a subtle case which a voter could get out of with a slap on the wrist simply by admitting their stupidity .
Seriously , a little bit of responsibility ?
I know politicians hate that word when applied to * them * , but come on : throwing insult after insult at the wall knowing that a few of them will stick is the antithesis of what I thought the USA was .
It you are going to , as a politician , betray the blood spilled by countless of your ancestors for the freedom you enjoy , well , I 'd like to see yours spilled in return .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about something like this (feel free to democratically suggest improvements or point out issues): When a law finally makes it's way through all the courts and the Supreme Court finds it unconstitutional how about putting *every single last bastard* who voted for it on trial for treason?
The Supreme Court could decide if it was an obvious case which would make it more difficult to get out of, an hysteria case which would allow reparations to more easily flow, or a subtle case which a voter could get out of with a slap on the wrist simply by admitting their stupidity.
Seriously, a little bit of responsibility?
I know politicians hate that word when applied to *them*, but come on: throwing insult after insult at the wall knowing that a few of them will stick is the antithesis of what I thought the USA was.
It you are going to, as a politician, betray the blood spilled by countless of your ancestors for the freedom you enjoy, well, I'd like to see yours spilled in return.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31101406</id>
	<title>Ironic</title>
	<author>Thurmont</author>
	<datestamp>1265912820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This law was put in place to weed out and convict terrorist groups.

Ironic isn't it... that the wording could be used to against the GOP and the Tea Party Movement. Cause they could easily be described as "...a subversive organization" consisting of "...person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States".

The wording can equally be applied to Osama Bin Laden and Al Jazzera as it could to Rush Limbaugh and Fox News cause neither group like Obama or what he stands for. They both want him out of office; i.e.- To overthrow the current government of the USA.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This law was put in place to weed out and convict terrorist groups .
Ironic is n't it... that the wording could be used to against the GOP and the Tea Party Movement .
Cause they could easily be described as " ...a subversive organization " consisting of " ...person who advocates , teaches , advises or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States " .
The wording can equally be applied to Osama Bin Laden and Al Jazzera as it could to Rush Limbaugh and Fox News cause neither group like Obama or what he stands for .
They both want him out of office ; i.e.- To overthrow the current government of the USA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This law was put in place to weed out and convict terrorist groups.
Ironic isn't it... that the wording could be used to against the GOP and the Tea Party Movement.
Cause they could easily be described as "...a subversive organization" consisting of "...person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States".
The wording can equally be applied to Osama Bin Laden and Al Jazzera as it could to Rush Limbaugh and Fox News cause neither group like Obama or what he stands for.
They both want him out of office; i.e.- To overthrow the current government of the USA.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099486</id>
	<title>Subversive Law is Subversive!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265903400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't be the only one to notice that the act of instituting a law with contradicts the Constitution under questionable pretense is an act of subverting said Constitution via means of questionable legality. But... that makes anyone involved in the passing of said law a subversive under said law? Um...</p><p>I guess some lawmakers are going to have some rather politically embarrassing forms to fill out in the very near future.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't be the only one to notice that the act of instituting a law with contradicts the Constitution under questionable pretense is an act of subverting said Constitution via means of questionable legality .
But... that makes anyone involved in the passing of said law a subversive under said law ?
Um...I guess some lawmakers are going to have some rather politically embarrassing forms to fill out in the very near future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't be the only one to notice that the act of instituting a law with contradicts the Constitution under questionable pretense is an act of subverting said Constitution via means of questionable legality.
But... that makes anyone involved in the passing of said law a subversive under said law?
Um...I guess some lawmakers are going to have some rather politically embarrassing forms to fill out in the very near future.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094496</id>
	<title>Re:subversive?</title>
	<author>tom.zombie</author>
	<datestamp>1265036700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well I guess they could.  They could go down to SC and register and then, when the government tried to bust them for being subversives point out that having a law that requires you to testify against yourself is in violation of the Fifth Amendment much like Tim Leary did when this country passed the Marihuana Tax Act

I mean, making the government and law makers look like a bunch of uneducated douches is kinda subversive act.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well I guess they could .
They could go down to SC and register and then , when the government tried to bust them for being subversives point out that having a law that requires you to testify against yourself is in violation of the Fifth Amendment much like Tim Leary did when this country passed the Marihuana Tax Act I mean , making the government and law makers look like a bunch of uneducated douches is kinda subversive act .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well I guess they could.
They could go down to SC and register and then, when the government tried to bust them for being subversives point out that having a law that requires you to testify against yourself is in violation of the Fifth Amendment much like Tim Leary did when this country passed the Marihuana Tax Act

I mean, making the government and law makers look like a bunch of uneducated douches is kinda subversive act.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094610</id>
	<title>Oh, I see</title>
	<author>sictransitgloriacfa</author>
	<datestamp>1265037600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, very good, we certainly don't want people overthrowing governments by force. Except in Iraq, Afghanistan, Chile, the Confederate States of America, or His Majesty's American colonies. That's <i>different</i>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , very good , we certainly do n't want people overthrowing governments by force .
Except in Iraq , Afghanistan , Chile , the Confederate States of America , or His Majesty 's American colonies .
That 's different .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, very good, we certainly don't want people overthrowing governments by force.
Except in Iraq, Afghanistan, Chile, the Confederate States of America, or His Majesty's American colonies.
That's different.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094594</id>
	<title>Re:Can I mail it in or what?</title>
	<author>s4ltyd0g</author>
	<datestamp>1265037480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Welcome to the nofly list</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Welcome to the nofly list</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Welcome to the nofly list</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093960</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093626</id>
	<title>LULZ.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265032860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OMG LULZ.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OMG LULZ .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>OMG LULZ.
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095504</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>DaleSwanson</author>
	<datestamp>1265044080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why isn't their punishment for trying to pass treasonous laws.</p></div><p>Because the people who would have to enact the law are the same people that would be punished by it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is n't their punishment for trying to pass treasonous laws.Because the people who would have to enact the law are the same people that would be punished by it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why isn't their punishment for trying to pass treasonous laws.Because the people who would have to enact the law are the same people that would be punished by it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095430</id>
	<title>Where to get the registration form</title>
	<author>CaroKann</author>
	<datestamp>1265043480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can get the registration form from <a href="http://www.scsos.com/Library\_of\_Forms\_and\_Fees#MiscellaneousForms" title="scsos.com"> here </a> [scsos.com] under Miscellaneous Forms.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can get the registration form from here [ scsos.com ] under Miscellaneous Forms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can get the registration form from  here  [scsos.com] under Miscellaneous Forms.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096012</id>
	<title>By their definitions, everyone needs to register</title>
	<author>purplie</author>
	<datestamp>1265047980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>By their definitions,

* North Carolina is a "subversive organization" since it "conducts" its government through the use of force (via the police).

* Anyone who interacts with the global economy meets the "affiliated...indirectly" part of being under "foreign control".

* Anyone who hears a foreign government official quoted on the news and has their opinion influenced (no matter how slightly) meets the definition of a "foreign agent".</htmltext>
<tokenext>By their definitions , * North Carolina is a " subversive organization " since it " conducts " its government through the use of force ( via the police ) .
* Anyone who interacts with the global economy meets the " affiliated...indirectly " part of being under " foreign control " .
* Anyone who hears a foreign government official quoted on the news and has their opinion influenced ( no matter how slightly ) meets the definition of a " foreign agent " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By their definitions,

* North Carolina is a "subversive organization" since it "conducts" its government through the use of force (via the police).
* Anyone who interacts with the global economy meets the "affiliated...indirectly" part of being under "foreign control".
* Anyone who hears a foreign government official quoted on the news and has their opinion influenced (no matter how slightly) meets the definition of a "foreign agent".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100172</id>
	<title>Re:Murderers, bank robbers, and rapists too.</title>
	<author>Chowderbags</author>
	<datestamp>1265906580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can advocate the violent radical overthrow of the government (or any other illegal act) all you want as long as it doesn't cause "imminent lawless action" (Brandenburg v. Ohio).</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can advocate the violent radical overthrow of the government ( or any other illegal act ) all you want as long as it does n't cause " imminent lawless action " ( Brandenburg v. Ohio ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can advocate the violent radical overthrow of the government (or any other illegal act) all you want as long as it doesn't cause "imminent lawless action" (Brandenburg v. Ohio).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31110100</id>
	<title>Re:</title>
	<author>gggrrl</author>
	<datestamp>1265917080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is a "nutty" law: Who would register?

The only thing I can think is there would be accusations... "other unlawful means". What does it mean? Is this a "draconian" law?

Is it "subversive" to speak out against corruption in politics? How about a citizen's "duty" to vote to throw out a politician? Is that going too far?

Does this mean, it is necessary to "request" people get out and vote to throw out a politician?

What is a "political subdivision"? What is that? The "county" or a "city" local government? Ooh, let's overthrow a "county"?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..."controlling"? It seems this law is for making accusations against any opposition to bad government.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a " nutty " law : Who would register ?
The only thing I can think is there would be accusations... " other unlawful means " .
What does it mean ?
Is this a " draconian " law ?
Is it " subversive " to speak out against corruption in politics ?
How about a citizen 's " duty " to vote to throw out a politician ?
Is that going too far ?
Does this mean , it is necessary to " request " people get out and vote to throw out a politician ?
What is a " political subdivision " ?
What is that ?
The " county " or a " city " local government ?
Ooh , let 's overthrow a " county " ?
... " controlling " ? It seems this law is for making accusations against any opposition to bad government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a "nutty" law: Who would register?
The only thing I can think is there would be accusations... "other unlawful means".
What does it mean?
Is this a "draconian" law?
Is it "subversive" to speak out against corruption in politics?
How about a citizen's "duty" to vote to throw out a politician?
Is that going too far?
Does this mean, it is necessary to "request" people get out and vote to throw out a politician?
What is a "political subdivision"?
What is that?
The "county" or a "city" local government?
Ooh, let's overthrow a "county"?
..."controlling"? It seems this law is for making accusations against any opposition to bad government.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093714</id>
	<title>Quick, before the trading deadline!</title>
	<author>NEDHead</author>
	<datestamp>1265033160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can we trade them even up for Haiti?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we trade them even up for Haiti ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we trade them even up for Haiti?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094552</id>
	<title>Re:subversive?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265037180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know. In South Carolina? The term subversive may also include the gays<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know .
In South Carolina ?
The term subversive may also include the gays ... : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know.
In South Carolina?
The term subversive may also include the gays ... :P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094818</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>NFN\_NLN</author>
	<datestamp>1265038920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How about something like this (feel free to democratically suggest improvements or point out issues): When a law finally makes it's way through all the courts and the Supreme Court finds it unconstitutional how about putting *every single last bastard* who voted for it on trial for treason?</p> </div><p>OP has valid point.  Why isn't their punishment for trying to pass treasonous laws.  The system is broken if there is no punishment.  I bet if laws like this were in place cowards would be less likely to push through quickie laws.

I had my own idea as well.  I read that in Britain they pass on average a law a day.  There should be some sort of time limit attached to laws, that way ridiculous things like "no eating chocolate ice cream while riding bareback" don't sit on the books adding clutter.  You could even attach it to laws like murder, just be damned sure to re-instate it like clock-work or we all get a freebie day<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about something like this ( feel free to democratically suggest improvements or point out issues ) : When a law finally makes it 's way through all the courts and the Supreme Court finds it unconstitutional how about putting * every single last bastard * who voted for it on trial for treason ?
OP has valid point .
Why is n't their punishment for trying to pass treasonous laws .
The system is broken if there is no punishment .
I bet if laws like this were in place cowards would be less likely to push through quickie laws .
I had my own idea as well .
I read that in Britain they pass on average a law a day .
There should be some sort of time limit attached to laws , that way ridiculous things like " no eating chocolate ice cream while riding bareback " do n't sit on the books adding clutter .
You could even attach it to laws like murder , just be damned sure to re-instate it like clock-work or we all get a freebie day : ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about something like this (feel free to democratically suggest improvements or point out issues): When a law finally makes it's way through all the courts and the Supreme Court finds it unconstitutional how about putting *every single last bastard* who voted for it on trial for treason?
OP has valid point.
Why isn't their punishment for trying to pass treasonous laws.
The system is broken if there is no punishment.
I bet if laws like this were in place cowards would be less likely to push through quickie laws.
I had my own idea as well.
I read that in Britain they pass on average a law a day.
There should be some sort of time limit attached to laws, that way ridiculous things like "no eating chocolate ice cream while riding bareback" don't sit on the books adding clutter.
You could even attach it to laws like murder, just be damned sure to re-instate it like clock-work or we all get a freebie day :).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093880</id>
	<title>Way to go, getting tough on terrorism</title>
	<author>NewYorkCountryLawyer</author>
	<datestamp>1265033820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why is South Carolina always in the vanguard of these great ideas? This is such a wonderful idea. I wish I'd thought of it first. <br> <br>All we need now is for terrorists to have to put a sticker in their windshield. Then if they get caught without it, we slap 'em with an appearance ticket.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is South Carolina always in the vanguard of these great ideas ?
This is such a wonderful idea .
I wish I 'd thought of it first .
All we need now is for terrorists to have to put a sticker in their windshield .
Then if they get caught without it , we slap 'em with an appearance ticket .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is South Carolina always in the vanguard of these great ideas?
This is such a wonderful idea.
I wish I'd thought of it first.
All we need now is for terrorists to have to put a sticker in their windshield.
Then if they get caught without it, we slap 'em with an appearance ticket.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097590</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265887140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait a minute, I see what you are trying to do here.<br>This would put the South Caroline government in jail, wouldn't it?<br>What a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... <b>revolutionary</b>... concept...</p><p>Officer, officer, I do not belong to his organisation!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait a minute , I see what you are trying to do here.This would put the South Caroline government in jail , would n't it ? What a .... revolutionary... concept...Officer , officer , I do not belong to his organisation !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait a minute, I see what you are trying to do here.This would put the South Caroline government in jail, wouldn't it?What a .... revolutionary... concept...Officer, officer, I do not belong to his organisation!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095538</id>
	<title>Re:Easy way to "democratically" jail and fine diss</title>
	<author>Memroid</author>
	<datestamp>1265044260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Don't like someone badmouthing the government?  Require them to register.  Then when they (obviously) don't do it, stick 'em in jail and take their money.</p><p>Enjoy your democracy, guys.</p></div><p>And if they do register, stick 'em in jail and take their money.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't like someone badmouthing the government ?
Require them to register .
Then when they ( obviously ) do n't do it , stick 'em in jail and take their money.Enjoy your democracy , guys.And if they do register , stick 'em in jail and take their money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't like someone badmouthing the government?
Require them to register.
Then when they (obviously) don't do it, stick 'em in jail and take their money.Enjoy your democracy, guys.And if they do register, stick 'em in jail and take their money.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095604</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265044740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Any law which isn't enforced and has no public record of ever having been enforced for a certain period of time, say 20 years or perhaps less, that the law in question simply is null and void."</p><p>Deputy Bubba: You wanted to see me, Sheriff?</p><p>Sheriff Leroy: Yep, Bubba, I just got a call from the state legerslature. It seems our anti-sodomy law is up for renewal.</p><p>Deputy Bubba: 'Bout damn time!</p><p>Sheriff Leroy: You betcha bygolly! We need to get crackin' on this. We only have a month.</p><p>Deputy Bubba: I'll tell the men to be on the lookout for sodomistic behavior.</p><p>Sheriff Leroy: Hop to it son. And tell the undercover sting teams to start greasin' up their backsides.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Any law which is n't enforced and has no public record of ever having been enforced for a certain period of time , say 20 years or perhaps less , that the law in question simply is null and void .
" Deputy Bubba : You wanted to see me , Sheriff ? Sheriff Leroy : Yep , Bubba , I just got a call from the state legerslature .
It seems our anti-sodomy law is up for renewal.Deputy Bubba : 'Bout damn time ! Sheriff Leroy : You betcha bygolly !
We need to get crackin ' on this .
We only have a month.Deputy Bubba : I 'll tell the men to be on the lookout for sodomistic behavior.Sheriff Leroy : Hop to it son .
And tell the undercover sting teams to start greasin ' up their backsides .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Any law which isn't enforced and has no public record of ever having been enforced for a certain period of time, say 20 years or perhaps less, that the law in question simply is null and void.
"Deputy Bubba: You wanted to see me, Sheriff?Sheriff Leroy: Yep, Bubba, I just got a call from the state legerslature.
It seems our anti-sodomy law is up for renewal.Deputy Bubba: 'Bout damn time!Sheriff Leroy: You betcha bygolly!
We need to get crackin' on this.
We only have a month.Deputy Bubba: I'll tell the men to be on the lookout for sodomistic behavior.Sheriff Leroy: Hop to it son.
And tell the undercover sting teams to start greasin' up their backsides.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097196</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>BasilBrush</author>
	<datestamp>1265882040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I read that in Britain they pass on average a law a day.</p></div></blockquote><p>You shouldn't believe everything you read in hysterical right wing media. The British government passed 27 laws in 2009. So that's about one law every 2 weeks, not one a day.<br><a href="http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/SearchResults.aspx?TYPE=QS&amp;Title=&amp;Year=2009&amp;Number=&amp;LegType=Act+(UK+Public+General)" title="statutelaw.gov.uk">http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/SearchResults.aspx?TYPE=QS&amp;Title=&amp;Year=2009&amp;Number=&amp;LegType=Act+(UK+Public+General)</a> [statutelaw.gov.uk]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I read that in Britain they pass on average a law a day.You should n't believe everything you read in hysterical right wing media .
The British government passed 27 laws in 2009 .
So that 's about one law every 2 weeks , not one a day.http : //www.statutelaw.gov.uk/SearchResults.aspx ? TYPE = QS&amp;Title = &amp;Year = 2009&amp;Number = &amp;LegType = Act + ( UK + Public + General ) [ statutelaw.gov.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read that in Britain they pass on average a law a day.You shouldn't believe everything you read in hysterical right wing media.
The British government passed 27 laws in 2009.
So that's about one law every 2 weeks, not one a day.http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/SearchResults.aspx?TYPE=QS&amp;Title=&amp;Year=2009&amp;Number=&amp;LegType=Act+(UK+Public+General) [statutelaw.gov.uk]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099600</id>
	<title>Yeah, that's gonna help...</title>
	<author>roc97007</author>
	<datestamp>1265903940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...Because everyone knows, people bent on the destruction of the country wouldn't risk a $25,000 fine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...Because everyone knows , people bent on the destruction of the country would n't risk a $ 25,000 fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...Because everyone knows, people bent on the destruction of the country wouldn't risk a $25,000 fine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094398</id>
	<title>And how many laws got repealed last year?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265036160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Was it Frank Herbert that wrote about a society where the only way to establish one new law was to repeal two in it's place?<br>At some point in human history, an individual could know all of the laws that pertained to them.  Now we have laws that need to be published in multiple volumes, and set of laws for the year have to be wheeled around.<br>Could we at least require a one for one replacement, so useless or obsolete laws get removed from the books?  (I realize this would stay on the books for 20 years even with the removal law.)</p><p>On a humorous note, what would the penalty be for falsely filling out the form with the names of the governor, and all of the house and senate members of South Carolina? (other then $5 and postage)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was it Frank Herbert that wrote about a society where the only way to establish one new law was to repeal two in it 's place ? At some point in human history , an individual could know all of the laws that pertained to them .
Now we have laws that need to be published in multiple volumes , and set of laws for the year have to be wheeled around.Could we at least require a one for one replacement , so useless or obsolete laws get removed from the books ?
( I realize this would stay on the books for 20 years even with the removal law .
) On a humorous note , what would the penalty be for falsely filling out the form with the names of the governor , and all of the house and senate members of South Carolina ?
( other then $ 5 and postage )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was it Frank Herbert that wrote about a society where the only way to establish one new law was to repeal two in it's place?At some point in human history, an individual could know all of the laws that pertained to them.
Now we have laws that need to be published in multiple volumes, and set of laws for the year have to be wheeled around.Could we at least require a one for one replacement, so useless or obsolete laws get removed from the books?
(I realize this would stay on the books for 20 years even with the removal law.
)On a humorous note, what would the penalty be for falsely filling out the form with the names of the governor, and all of the house and senate members of South Carolina?
(other then $5 and postage)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094268</id>
	<title>Re:Easy way to "democratically" jail and fine diss</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265035620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly <strong>advocates</strong>, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or <strong>propriety</strong> of <strong>controlling</strong>, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States [or] of this State."</p></div><p>If you advocate the propriety of the people to control their government in a democratic country, you fall under this law. It definitely covers more than planning to take actual action - it also covers advocating, advising or teaching.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" every corporation , society , association , camp , group , bund , political party , assembly , body or organization , composed of two or more persons , which directly or indirectly advocates , advises , teaches or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States [ or ] of this State .
" If you advocate the propriety of the people to control their government in a democratic country , you fall under this law .
It definitely covers more than planning to take actual action - it also covers advocating , advising or teaching .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States [or] of this State.
"If you advocate the propriety of the people to control their government in a democratic country, you fall under this law.
It definitely covers more than planning to take actual action - it also covers advocating, advising or teaching.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099226</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>houghi</author>
	<datestamp>1265902020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Belgium there was a discussion to check all laws and mtrow out the old and useless ones. (The ones where you can't walk with a goat and a pig on Sunday on the main street. (Not a real law, just an idea of what we talk about)) and the result is that it isn't worth doing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Belgium there was a discussion to check all laws and mtrow out the old and useless ones .
( The ones where you ca n't walk with a goat and a pig on Sunday on the main street .
( Not a real law , just an idea of what we talk about ) ) and the result is that it is n't worth doing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Belgium there was a discussion to check all laws and mtrow out the old and useless ones.
(The ones where you can't walk with a goat and a pig on Sunday on the main street.
(Not a real law, just an idea of what we talk about)) and the result is that it isn't worth doing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094408</id>
	<title>Re:Easy way to "democratically" jail and fine diss</title>
	<author>tom.zombie</author>
	<datestamp>1265036160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is mostly likely unconstitutional. In <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leary\_v.\_United\_States" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Leary v The United States</a> [wikipedia.org] The Marihuana Tax Act (yes that is the "correct" spelling) was found to be in violation of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth\_Amendment\_to\_the\_United\_States\_Constitution" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Fifth Amendment</a> [wikipedia.org].  I wish I could fire the people who come up with this stuff.  It's like they don't even both to think. "Dur Hur, Lets make it illegal not to tell us you're a potential criminal." It scares me that we put these people in power.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is mostly likely unconstitutional .
In Leary v The United States [ wikipedia.org ] The Marihuana Tax Act ( yes that is the " correct " spelling ) was found to be in violation of the Fifth Amendment [ wikipedia.org ] .
I wish I could fire the people who come up with this stuff .
It 's like they do n't even both to think .
" Dur Hur , Lets make it illegal not to tell us you 're a potential criminal .
" It scares me that we put these people in power .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is mostly likely unconstitutional.
In Leary v The United States [wikipedia.org] The Marihuana Tax Act (yes that is the "correct" spelling) was found to be in violation of the Fifth Amendment [wikipedia.org].
I wish I could fire the people who come up with this stuff.
It's like they don't even both to think.
"Dur Hur, Lets make it illegal not to tell us you're a potential criminal.
" It scares me that we put these people in power.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096880</id>
	<title>or an organization subject to foreign control</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265921400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait, sounds like the Federal Reserve is already in violation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait , sounds like the Federal Reserve is already in violation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait, sounds like the Federal Reserve is already in violation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31102808</id>
	<title>This actually isn't that bad of an idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265918100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This probably will help to tie up people that they hold under suspission... so it isn't such a bad idea, for an over-controlling government.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This probably will help to tie up people that they hold under suspission... so it is n't such a bad idea , for an over-controlling government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This probably will help to tie up people that they hold under suspission... so it isn't such a bad idea, for an over-controlling government.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093824</id>
	<title>Great Futile Gestures Of Our Time</title>
	<author>Dunx</author>
	<datestamp>1265033640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In other news, immigration officials have reported that they have seen an increase in the number of terrorists self-identifying on immigration declaration forms filled in at ports of entry. "It's since we added the extra questions," said a spokesman. "We ask if they really mean it, then if they are willing to cross their heart and hope to die."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In other news , immigration officials have reported that they have seen an increase in the number of terrorists self-identifying on immigration declaration forms filled in at ports of entry .
" It 's since we added the extra questions , " said a spokesman .
" We ask if they really mean it , then if they are willing to cross their heart and hope to die .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other news, immigration officials have reported that they have seen an increase in the number of terrorists self-identifying on immigration declaration forms filled in at ports of entry.
"It's since we added the extra questions," said a spokesman.
"We ask if they really mean it, then if they are willing to cross their heart and hope to die.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31114784</id>
	<title>It's Just a Budget Thing</title>
	<author>Bob9113</author>
	<datestamp>1265997240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>every member of a subversive organization, or an organization subject to foreign control, every foreign agent and every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... shall register with the Secretary of State.</i></p><p><i>(1) "Subversive organization" means every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means;</i></p><p><i>[W]hen a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.</i></p><p>I know it is too late to be commenting on this thread, but I feel I must.</p><p>The Declaration of Independence advises the duty of overthrowing the government of the United States. The United States, in turn, is a society comprised of two or more persons which directly advises the duty of overthrowing the government of the United States (the distinction being the nation and the government). Furthermore the intended means for such overthrow is obviously the use of guns, as evidenced by the Second Amendment and extensive clarifying writings from the authors of the charter. The only remaining question is the final phrase of the S.C. law:</p><p><i>by force or violence or other unlawful means</i></p><p>Given that overthrowing the government is written into the charter of the nation, it seems obvious that it cannot be unlawful. It then falls to the question of the meaning of the phrase "...or other unlawful means". If that phrase implies that the previous factors "force" or "violence" are only covered if they are unlawful means, then this law does not apply to United States citizens. If not, then it applies to all United States citizens.</p><p>Given the uncertainty of such vague phrasing in courts of law, I think that South Carolina must intend for all United States citizens to register. However, registration costs $5. That leads to only one conclusion: Like most states South Carolina is having budget problems and is hoping to close the gap by collecting $1.5 billion in registration fees.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>every member of a subversive organization , or an organization subject to foreign control , every foreign agent and every person who advocates , teaches , advises or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States ... shall register with the Secretary of State .
( 1 ) " Subversive organization " means every corporation , society , association , camp , group , bund , political party , assembly , body or organization , composed of two or more persons , which directly or indirectly advocates , advises , teaches or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States , of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means ; [ W ] hen a long train of abuses and usurpations , pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism , it is their right , it is their duty , to throw off such Government , and to provide new Guards for their future security.I know it is too late to be commenting on this thread , but I feel I must.The Declaration of Independence advises the duty of overthrowing the government of the United States .
The United States , in turn , is a society comprised of two or more persons which directly advises the duty of overthrowing the government of the United States ( the distinction being the nation and the government ) .
Furthermore the intended means for such overthrow is obviously the use of guns , as evidenced by the Second Amendment and extensive clarifying writings from the authors of the charter .
The only remaining question is the final phrase of the S.C. law : by force or violence or other unlawful meansGiven that overthrowing the government is written into the charter of the nation , it seems obvious that it can not be unlawful .
It then falls to the question of the meaning of the phrase " ...or other unlawful means " .
If that phrase implies that the previous factors " force " or " violence " are only covered if they are unlawful means , then this law does not apply to United States citizens .
If not , then it applies to all United States citizens.Given the uncertainty of such vague phrasing in courts of law , I think that South Carolina must intend for all United States citizens to register .
However , registration costs $ 5 .
That leads to only one conclusion : Like most states South Carolina is having budget problems and is hoping to close the gap by collecting $ 1.5 billion in registration fees .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>every member of a subversive organization, or an organization subject to foreign control, every foreign agent and every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States ... shall register with the Secretary of State.
(1) "Subversive organization" means every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means;[W]hen a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.I know it is too late to be commenting on this thread, but I feel I must.The Declaration of Independence advises the duty of overthrowing the government of the United States.
The United States, in turn, is a society comprised of two or more persons which directly advises the duty of overthrowing the government of the United States (the distinction being the nation and the government).
Furthermore the intended means for such overthrow is obviously the use of guns, as evidenced by the Second Amendment and extensive clarifying writings from the authors of the charter.
The only remaining question is the final phrase of the S.C. law:by force or violence or other unlawful meansGiven that overthrowing the government is written into the charter of the nation, it seems obvious that it cannot be unlawful.
It then falls to the question of the meaning of the phrase "...or other unlawful means".
If that phrase implies that the previous factors "force" or "violence" are only covered if they are unlawful means, then this law does not apply to United States citizens.
If not, then it applies to all United States citizens.Given the uncertainty of such vague phrasing in courts of law, I think that South Carolina must intend for all United States citizens to register.
However, registration costs $5.
That leads to only one conclusion: Like most states South Carolina is having budget problems and is hoping to close the gap by collecting $1.5 billion in registration fees.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31102456</id>
	<title>Re:Can I register from a distance?</title>
	<author>mikee805</author>
	<datestamp>1265917200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> I'd like to see a few hundred million people register as South Carolina subversives.</p></div><p>I am sure SC would like to see that too at $5 a pop!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like to see a few hundred million people register as South Carolina subversives.I am sure SC would like to see that too at $ 5 a pop !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I'd like to see a few hundred million people register as South Carolina subversives.I am sure SC would like to see that too at $5 a pop!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093730</id>
	<title>No difference to them</title>
	<author>neghvar1</author>
	<datestamp>1265033220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>To the US government, there is no difference between a terrorist and a constitutional patriot.  Any opposition to the present-day government is to be supressed, silenced, destroyed and/or killed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To the US government , there is no difference between a terrorist and a constitutional patriot .
Any opposition to the present-day government is to be supressed , silenced , destroyed and/or killed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To the US government, there is no difference between a terrorist and a constitutional patriot.
Any opposition to the present-day government is to be supressed, silenced, destroyed and/or killed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097348</id>
	<title>This makes perfect sense</title>
	<author>RichLooker</author>
	<datestamp>1265884140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For decades, foreigners wanting to enter the USA have been obliged to state whether they are terrorists or not (the ubiquitous, humorous visa waiver also asks you to state whether you plan on engaging in immoral activites, hehe) - why should resident terrorists be allowed to operate under false flag ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>For decades , foreigners wanting to enter the USA have been obliged to state whether they are terrorists or not ( the ubiquitous , humorous visa waiver also asks you to state whether you plan on engaging in immoral activites , hehe ) - why should resident terrorists be allowed to operate under false flag ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For decades, foreigners wanting to enter the USA have been obliged to state whether they are terrorists or not (the ubiquitous, humorous visa waiver also asks you to state whether you plan on engaging in immoral activites, hehe) - why should resident terrorists be allowed to operate under false flag ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094466</id>
	<title>So now the Klan will register?</title>
	<author>doginthewoods</author>
	<datestamp>1265036520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if somebody will ask S.C. why they haven't told the KKK to register?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if somebody will ask S.C. why they have n't told the KKK to register ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if somebody will ask S.C. why they haven't told the KKK to register?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093944</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265034120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The Republican Party is currently planning on overthrowing the existing government of the United States.</p></div><p>And the Democrats totally aren't... because our nation has totally been socialist from the beginning. Right.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Republican Party is currently planning on overthrowing the existing government of the United States.And the Democrats totally are n't... because our nation has totally been socialist from the beginning .
Right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Republican Party is currently planning on overthrowing the existing government of the United States.And the Democrats totally aren't... because our nation has totally been socialist from the beginning.
Right.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098002</id>
	<title>Re:New laws</title>
	<author>roman\_mir</author>
	<datestamp>1265891640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1.  "illegal stuff" - in this case it is not illegal stuff, it is very legal stuff that they are trying to make criminal.  It is legal because your Constitution says it is legal.  Peaceful assembly, freedom of speech, not incriminating yourself, none of those things can be described as 'illegal stuff', so your observation does not apply to this particular law.</p><p>2.  It is very easy to see why there are more and more laws restating sort of the same argument: illegal to murder people, but also illegal to murder people who are under 18 for example.  (I came up with this as an example, I don't know what US laws say about that.) But it is very easy to find rational explanations, in fact more than one to this phenomena.</p><p>
&nbsp; a. A politician wants to be known as someone who is 'tough on crime', so he comes up with this nonsense, which is redundant.  He knows that other laws cover it and that people support those other laws, so it is very easy to gain trust of the population if you come up with something, that basically says the same thing as something else, that is widely supported.  There is no risk of going wrong there.</p><p>
&nbsp; b. If there is an incident that already involves a crime and obviously is illegal, in many cases politicians will use that to come up with new laws, that are the same as other laws, that cover that crime already.  Maybe this is done for the same reason as the point a above, or maybe it is just a knee jerk reaction, to show the population that politicians are paying attention and to put a check mark there - we have done something, we reacted, we do not look to the population as if we do not care.</p><p>
&nbsp; c. Then there is this thing, you can add more laws and then some will stick to someone, who already has committed a crime.  Some more punishment can be applied, fewer chances of early parole, etc.</p><p>
&nbsp; d. The worst of all is this, and I think this is also happening: government consists of politicians, who want to stay in power and when economy goes bust for any reason, the people will become upset and they just might replace the politicians in power.  So politicians want to reduce freedoms and ability of people to replace them.  This is where the government wants to change the system to become the dictator government.  Like Bush said: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvUEsm0wNIA" title="youtube.com">If this was a dictatorship it would be a heck of a lot easier<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... just as long as I am the dictator.</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>There you go, plenty of rational explanations to this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
" illegal stuff " - in this case it is not illegal stuff , it is very legal stuff that they are trying to make criminal .
It is legal because your Constitution says it is legal .
Peaceful assembly , freedom of speech , not incriminating yourself , none of those things can be described as 'illegal stuff ' , so your observation does not apply to this particular law.2 .
It is very easy to see why there are more and more laws restating sort of the same argument : illegal to murder people , but also illegal to murder people who are under 18 for example .
( I came up with this as an example , I do n't know what US laws say about that .
) But it is very easy to find rational explanations , in fact more than one to this phenomena .
  a. A politician wants to be known as someone who is 'tough on crime ' , so he comes up with this nonsense , which is redundant .
He knows that other laws cover it and that people support those other laws , so it is very easy to gain trust of the population if you come up with something , that basically says the same thing as something else , that is widely supported .
There is no risk of going wrong there .
  b. If there is an incident that already involves a crime and obviously is illegal , in many cases politicians will use that to come up with new laws , that are the same as other laws , that cover that crime already .
Maybe this is done for the same reason as the point a above , or maybe it is just a knee jerk reaction , to show the population that politicians are paying attention and to put a check mark there - we have done something , we reacted , we do not look to the population as if we do not care .
  c. Then there is this thing , you can add more laws and then some will stick to someone , who already has committed a crime .
Some more punishment can be applied , fewer chances of early parole , etc .
  d. The worst of all is this , and I think this is also happening : government consists of politicians , who want to stay in power and when economy goes bust for any reason , the people will become upset and they just might replace the politicians in power .
So politicians want to reduce freedoms and ability of people to replace them .
This is where the government wants to change the system to become the dictator government .
Like Bush said : If this was a dictatorship it would be a heck of a lot easier ... just as long as I am the dictator .
[ youtube.com ] There you go , plenty of rational explanations to this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
"illegal stuff" - in this case it is not illegal stuff, it is very legal stuff that they are trying to make criminal.
It is legal because your Constitution says it is legal.
Peaceful assembly, freedom of speech, not incriminating yourself, none of those things can be described as 'illegal stuff', so your observation does not apply to this particular law.2.
It is very easy to see why there are more and more laws restating sort of the same argument: illegal to murder people, but also illegal to murder people who are under 18 for example.
(I came up with this as an example, I don't know what US laws say about that.
) But it is very easy to find rational explanations, in fact more than one to this phenomena.
  a. A politician wants to be known as someone who is 'tough on crime', so he comes up with this nonsense, which is redundant.
He knows that other laws cover it and that people support those other laws, so it is very easy to gain trust of the population if you come up with something, that basically says the same thing as something else, that is widely supported.
There is no risk of going wrong there.
  b. If there is an incident that already involves a crime and obviously is illegal, in many cases politicians will use that to come up with new laws, that are the same as other laws, that cover that crime already.
Maybe this is done for the same reason as the point a above, or maybe it is just a knee jerk reaction, to show the population that politicians are paying attention and to put a check mark there - we have done something, we reacted, we do not look to the population as if we do not care.
  c. Then there is this thing, you can add more laws and then some will stick to someone, who already has committed a crime.
Some more punishment can be applied, fewer chances of early parole, etc.
  d. The worst of all is this, and I think this is also happening: government consists of politicians, who want to stay in power and when economy goes bust for any reason, the people will become upset and they just might replace the politicians in power.
So politicians want to reduce freedoms and ability of people to replace them.
This is where the government wants to change the system to become the dictator government.
Like Bush said: If this was a dictatorship it would be a heck of a lot easier ... just as long as I am the dictator.
[youtube.com]There you go, plenty of rational explanations to this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095590</id>
	<title>so much for free speech</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265044620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so much for free speech</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so much for free speech</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so much for free speech</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095054</id>
	<title>Subversive Groups Must Now Register In South Caro</title>
	<author>Streetlight</author>
	<datestamp>1265040480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In South Carolina the Democratic Party would be considered as a subversive organization since they want to control the federal and state governments. In doing so the Democrats would have to complain about the entrenched Republican control of same.

This law is clearly unconstitutional. Of course it'll take an activist court system to say so.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In South Carolina the Democratic Party would be considered as a subversive organization since they want to control the federal and state governments .
In doing so the Democrats would have to complain about the entrenched Republican control of same .
This law is clearly unconstitutional .
Of course it 'll take an activist court system to say so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In South Carolina the Democratic Party would be considered as a subversive organization since they want to control the federal and state governments.
In doing so the Democrats would have to complain about the entrenched Republican control of same.
This law is clearly unconstitutional.
Of course it'll take an activist court system to say so.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096100</id>
	<title>Overthrow ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265048520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would it be 'advocating overthrow'  to advocate the adoption of a 28th Amendment to the U.S. Const. that provides in effect for the repeal of all prior Articles, Amendments and provisions?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would it be 'advocating overthrow ' to advocate the adoption of a 28th Amendment to the U.S. Const. that provides in effect for the repeal of all prior Articles , Amendments and provisions ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would it be 'advocating overthrow'  to advocate the adoption of a 28th Amendment to the U.S. Const. that provides in effect for the repeal of all prior Articles, Amendments and provisions?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100472</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>mschirmer</author>
	<datestamp>1265907780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or... a government funded oversight committee could be created to review these laws and pass recommendation back to the law makers. Then eventually the committee would get tied up in their own review processes and all laws would become null and void due to "underfunding" and "lack of resources".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or... a government funded oversight committee could be created to review these laws and pass recommendation back to the law makers .
Then eventually the committee would get tied up in their own review processes and all laws would become null and void due to " underfunding " and " lack of resources " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or... a government funded oversight committee could be created to review these laws and pass recommendation back to the law makers.
Then eventually the committee would get tied up in their own review processes and all laws would become null and void due to "underfunding" and "lack of resources".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094372</id>
	<title>Re:Easy way to "democratically" jail and fine diss</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265036040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does it matter, in any practical sense of the word, if its unconstitutional if they only use it to get warrants and fish for evidence of other crimes?  As long as they drop the (obviously unconstitutional) charge before it goes to court how does it ever get tested?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it matter , in any practical sense of the word , if its unconstitutional if they only use it to get warrants and fish for evidence of other crimes ?
As long as they drop the ( obviously unconstitutional ) charge before it goes to court how does it ever get tested ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it matter, in any practical sense of the word, if its unconstitutional if they only use it to get warrants and fish for evidence of other crimes?
As long as they drop the (obviously unconstitutional) charge before it goes to court how does it ever get tested?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100180</id>
	<title>First to secede?</title>
	<author>sjbe</author>
	<datestamp>1265906640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does this affect the government of South Carolina as well?  After all, they were the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American\_Civil\_War#Secession\_of\_South\_Carolina" title="wikipedia.org">first state to secede</a> [wikipedia.org] from the United States in 1860.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this affect the government of South Carolina as well ?
After all , they were the first state to secede [ wikipedia.org ] from the United States in 1860 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this affect the government of South Carolina as well?
After all, they were the first state to secede [wikipedia.org] from the United States in 1860.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096560</id>
	<title>Mass Registration!</title>
	<author>Tasala</author>
	<datestamp>1265053740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We should all register as members of the Galactic Empire or Rebel Alliance.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We should all register as members of the Galactic Empire or Rebel Alliance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We should all register as members of the Galactic Empire or Rebel Alliance.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094070</id>
	<title>What about Microsoft?</title>
	<author>AffidavitDonda</author>
	<datestamp>1265034720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer have to register?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer have to register ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer have to register?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093636</id>
	<title>Easy way to "democratically" jail and fine dissent</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265032860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't like someone badmouthing the government?  Require them to register.  Then when they (obviously) don't do it, stick 'em in jail and take their money.</p><p>Enjoy your democracy, guys.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't like someone badmouthing the government ?
Require them to register .
Then when they ( obviously ) do n't do it , stick 'em in jail and take their money.Enjoy your democracy , guys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't like someone badmouthing the government?
Require them to register.
Then when they (obviously) don't do it, stick 'em in jail and take their money.Enjoy your democracy, guys.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094842</id>
	<title>Dear Samzenpus</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1265039040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
For what it's worth, this selection evens out your last 100 moronic selections.
</p><p>
Good one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For what it 's worth , this selection evens out your last 100 moronic selections .
Good one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
For what it's worth, this selection evens out your last 100 moronic selections.
Good one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093960</id>
	<title>Re:Can I mail it in or what?</title>
	<author>Clemsonuee</author>
	<datestamp>1265034180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I do live in South Carolina and am currently registering with some of my friends.  You can join our group if you want.  Though the form only asks for members living in the state.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do live in South Carolina and am currently registering with some of my friends .
You can join our group if you want .
Though the form only asks for members living in the state .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do live in South Carolina and am currently registering with some of my friends.
You can join our group if you want.
Though the form only asks for members living in the state.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093614</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094134</id>
	<title>Re:Like paying an illegal drug tax</title>
	<author>swb</author>
	<datestamp>1265034960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, "tax stamps" was exactly what I was thinking.  Ironically, Mississippi used the same system for alcohol when it was still a "dry" state.</p><p>When they began "issuing" and requiring them in Minnesota, they actually sold a couple of dozen of them.  They made a big point of being able to buy them anonymously but glossed over the fact they were sold in a government building which was easily monitored by law enforcement.  I don't remember any prosecutions making the news but I'm sure from time to time they beat somebody up with it or use it as leverage even if they don't ultimately convict them.</p><p>Now if they would just wise up and legalize AND sell the tax stamps they could make real money (although I think the tax stamp prices would have to be re-aligned with the real world cost of the product versus some artificially high number).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , " tax stamps " was exactly what I was thinking .
Ironically , Mississippi used the same system for alcohol when it was still a " dry " state.When they began " issuing " and requiring them in Minnesota , they actually sold a couple of dozen of them .
They made a big point of being able to buy them anonymously but glossed over the fact they were sold in a government building which was easily monitored by law enforcement .
I do n't remember any prosecutions making the news but I 'm sure from time to time they beat somebody up with it or use it as leverage even if they do n't ultimately convict them.Now if they would just wise up and legalize AND sell the tax stamps they could make real money ( although I think the tax stamp prices would have to be re-aligned with the real world cost of the product versus some artificially high number ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, "tax stamps" was exactly what I was thinking.
Ironically, Mississippi used the same system for alcohol when it was still a "dry" state.When they began "issuing" and requiring them in Minnesota, they actually sold a couple of dozen of them.
They made a big point of being able to buy them anonymously but glossed over the fact they were sold in a government building which was easily monitored by law enforcement.
I don't remember any prosecutions making the news but I'm sure from time to time they beat somebody up with it or use it as leverage even if they don't ultimately convict them.Now if they would just wise up and legalize AND sell the tax stamps they could make real money (although I think the tax stamp prices would have to be re-aligned with the real world cost of the product versus some artificially high number).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094276</id>
	<title>Re:Awwwww crap!</title>
	<author>TOGSolid</author>
	<datestamp>1265035680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So...does this mean Dr. Steel needs to register in South Carolina now?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So...does this mean Dr. Steel needs to register in South Carolina now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So...does this mean Dr. Steel needs to register in South Carolina now?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094078</id>
	<title>Just a wee bit unconstitutional</title>
	<author>bit9</author>
	<datestamp>1265034780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like an end-run around the First Amendment. The legislators probably realized that an outright ban on such groups would amount to prior restraint of free speech, so they figured they could achieve essentially the same effect by attempting to regulate your right to free speech, knowing that no sane person (or group) would willingly put themselves under the government's microscope. This is straight out of the playbook of J. Edgar Hoover. I am not a lawyer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like an end-run around the First Amendment .
The legislators probably realized that an outright ban on such groups would amount to prior restraint of free speech , so they figured they could achieve essentially the same effect by attempting to regulate your right to free speech , knowing that no sane person ( or group ) would willingly put themselves under the government 's microscope .
This is straight out of the playbook of J. Edgar Hoover .
I am not a lawyer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like an end-run around the First Amendment.
The legislators probably realized that an outright ban on such groups would amount to prior restraint of free speech, so they figured they could achieve essentially the same effect by attempting to regulate your right to free speech, knowing that no sane person (or group) would willingly put themselves under the government's microscope.
This is straight out of the playbook of J. Edgar Hoover.
I am not a lawyer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097320</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265883780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So every corporation that bribes the government needs to register then.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So every corporation that bribes the government needs to register then .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So every corporation that bribes the government needs to register then.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094364</id>
	<title>Re:New laws</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1265035980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not sure it is rational, but the explanation I would go with is that a good chunk of humanity are happy authoritarians.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure it is rational , but the explanation I would go with is that a good chunk of humanity are happy authoritarians .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure it is rational, but the explanation I would go with is that a good chunk of humanity are happy authoritarians.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096082</id>
	<title>News: T. Jefferson and B. Franklin Arrested!!!</title>
	<author>Jane Q. Public</author>
	<datestamp>1265048400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, I suppose that means anybody who is displaying the Declaration of Independence, or who believes in its principles, are now considered outlaws!
<br> <br>
The Declaration was a subversive document, pretty much by definition, and advocated the overthrow of governments when the people believed it to be necessary. That is very definitely subversive language, penned and signed by a subversive organization.
<br> <br>
In fact, if we look to history and do a real comparison, it advocates the overthrow of governments that rather broadly resemble the Federal government we have today.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I suppose that means anybody who is displaying the Declaration of Independence , or who believes in its principles , are now considered outlaws !
The Declaration was a subversive document , pretty much by definition , and advocated the overthrow of governments when the people believed it to be necessary .
That is very definitely subversive language , penned and signed by a subversive organization .
In fact , if we look to history and do a real comparison , it advocates the overthrow of governments that rather broadly resemble the Federal government we have today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I suppose that means anybody who is displaying the Declaration of Independence, or who believes in its principles, are now considered outlaws!
The Declaration was a subversive document, pretty much by definition, and advocated the overthrow of governments when the people believed it to be necessary.
That is very definitely subversive language, penned and signed by a subversive organization.
In fact, if we look to history and do a real comparison, it advocates the overthrow of governments that rather broadly resemble the Federal government we have today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096810</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>Protoslo</author>
	<datestamp>1265920500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know, the Patriot Act <i>did</i> have a sunset provision, and it was renewed anyway with quite a bit of bipartisan vigor, if not the near-unanimity of the first round.  I don't think automatic expiration is quite going to cut it. It seems like it wouldn't hurt...but consider this: if there were a deluge of laws coming up for renewal constantly, it is possible that the legislature would spend even <i>less</i> time reading legislation than it already does.  That said, perhaps if the restrictions only applied to certain classes of laws, that disadvantage could be avoided.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , the Patriot Act did have a sunset provision , and it was renewed anyway with quite a bit of bipartisan vigor , if not the near-unanimity of the first round .
I do n't think automatic expiration is quite going to cut it .
It seems like it would n't hurt...but consider this : if there were a deluge of laws coming up for renewal constantly , it is possible that the legislature would spend even less time reading legislation than it already does .
That said , perhaps if the restrictions only applied to certain classes of laws , that disadvantage could be avoided .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, the Patriot Act did have a sunset provision, and it was renewed anyway with quite a bit of bipartisan vigor, if not the near-unanimity of the first round.
I don't think automatic expiration is quite going to cut it.
It seems like it wouldn't hurt...but consider this: if there were a deluge of laws coming up for renewal constantly, it is possible that the legislature would spend even less time reading legislation than it already does.
That said, perhaps if the restrictions only applied to certain classes of laws, that disadvantage could be avoided.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094768</id>
	<title>Re:So, do we get immunity?</title>
	<author>bugs2squash</author>
	<datestamp>1265038620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Screw immunity. Do we get the right to use the term "registered anarchist" or "licensed to rebel" on our business cards, or otherwise use licensed logos and other trademarks pertaining to rebelliousness from the state of South Carolina ? I could look so cool if this initiative has a half-way decent logo. I mean, not as cool as if California or Texas had done it, but cooler than I look now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Screw immunity .
Do we get the right to use the term " registered anarchist " or " licensed to rebel " on our business cards , or otherwise use licensed logos and other trademarks pertaining to rebelliousness from the state of South Carolina ?
I could look so cool if this initiative has a half-way decent logo .
I mean , not as cool as if California or Texas had done it , but cooler than I look now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screw immunity.
Do we get the right to use the term "registered anarchist" or "licensed to rebel" on our business cards, or otherwise use licensed logos and other trademarks pertaining to rebelliousness from the state of South Carolina ?
I could look so cool if this initiative has a half-way decent logo.
I mean, not as cool as if California or Texas had done it, but cooler than I look now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093652</id>
	<title>Well...</title>
	<author>thinkpol</author>
	<datestamp>1265032920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The story also states that it only costs $5 to register.  At least it's not expensive to get on such an exclusive list!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The story also states that it only costs $ 5 to register .
At least it 's not expensive to get on such an exclusive list !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The story also states that it only costs $5 to register.
At least it's not expensive to get on such an exclusive list!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094638</id>
	<title>Lets make the act of committing crimes illegal too</title>
	<author>Therilith</author>
	<datestamp>1265037720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's just another stupid law among many that they throw at people to make sure <i>something</i> sticks, like making it illegal not to report stolen property when doing your taxes.

Why not just increase the maximum penalty of every crime to life in prison then? Because that's where we'll be soon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's just another stupid law among many that they throw at people to make sure something sticks , like making it illegal not to report stolen property when doing your taxes .
Why not just increase the maximum penalty of every crime to life in prison then ?
Because that 's where we 'll be soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's just another stupid law among many that they throw at people to make sure something sticks, like making it illegal not to report stolen property when doing your taxes.
Why not just increase the maximum penalty of every crime to life in prison then?
Because that's where we'll be soon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094834</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>ozdeadman</author>
	<datestamp>1265038980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>America is retarded. Oh wait, I am Australian, disregard what I said.</htmltext>
<tokenext>America is retarded .
Oh wait , I am Australian , disregard what I said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>America is retarded.
Oh wait, I am Australian, disregard what I said.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094126</id>
	<title>Re:Easy way to "democratically" jail and fine diss</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265034960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is a constitutional republic, not a democracy. And you know what? We <i>did</i> enjoy it while it lasted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is a constitutional republic , not a democracy .
And you know what ?
We did enjoy it while it lasted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is a constitutional republic, not a democracy.
And you know what?
We did enjoy it while it lasted.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095458</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265043660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lobbyists must be pissed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lobbyists must be pissed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lobbyists must be pissed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094020</id>
	<title>That's it, I'm moving</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265034480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is one of the stupidest things I have heard, and this state has been making a lot of stupid moves lately, I am moving to another state asap!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is one of the stupidest things I have heard , and this state has been making a lot of stupid moves lately , I am moving to another state asap !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is one of the stupidest things I have heard, and this state has been making a lot of stupid moves lately, I am moving to another state asap!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31107866</id>
	<title>Re:Murderers, bank robbers, and rapists too.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265895120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>\_inciting\_ the overthrow isn't free speech, no. But \_advocating\_ it certainly is.</p></div><p>Both of them are free speech.  It's just that one of them is legal, and the other is not.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>\ _inciting \ _ the overthrow is n't free speech , no .
But \ _advocating \ _ it certainly is.Both of them are free speech .
It 's just that one of them is legal , and the other is not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>\_inciting\_ the overthrow isn't free speech, no.
But \_advocating\_ it certainly is.Both of them are free speech.
It's just that one of them is legal, and the other is not.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094974</id>
	<title>Political parties</title>
	<author>WPIDalamar</author>
	<datestamp>1265039940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>" every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government"</p><p>Political parties certainly advocate and advise the controlling and conducting of the government.  I hope all those politicians are registering.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" every person who advocates , teaches , advises or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government " Political parties certainly advocate and advise the controlling and conducting of the government .
I hope all those politicians are registering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>" every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government"Political parties certainly advocate and advise the controlling and conducting of the government.
I hope all those politicians are registering.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31109446</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>Meski</author>
	<datestamp>1265909100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>OP has valid point.  Why isn't their punishment for trying to pass treasonous laws.  The system is broken if there is no punishment.  I bet if laws like this were in place cowards would be less likely to push through quickie laws.

I had my own idea as well.  I read that in Britain they pass on average a law a day.  There should be some sort of time limit attached to laws, that way ridiculous things like "no eating chocolate ice cream while riding bareback" don't sit on the books adding clutter.  You could even attach it to laws like murder, just be damned sure to re-instate it like clock-work or we all get a freebie day<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:).</p></div><p>Two things in your post caught my eye.  'quickie" and "riding bareback".  That law could have a quite different meaning in today's lingua.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>OP has valid point .
Why is n't their punishment for trying to pass treasonous laws .
The system is broken if there is no punishment .
I bet if laws like this were in place cowards would be less likely to push through quickie laws .
I had my own idea as well .
I read that in Britain they pass on average a law a day .
There should be some sort of time limit attached to laws , that way ridiculous things like " no eating chocolate ice cream while riding bareback " do n't sit on the books adding clutter .
You could even attach it to laws like murder , just be damned sure to re-instate it like clock-work or we all get a freebie day : ) .Two things in your post caught my eye .
'quickie " and " riding bareback " .
That law could have a quite different meaning in today 's lingua .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OP has valid point.
Why isn't their punishment for trying to pass treasonous laws.
The system is broken if there is no punishment.
I bet if laws like this were in place cowards would be less likely to push through quickie laws.
I had my own idea as well.
I read that in Britain they pass on average a law a day.
There should be some sort of time limit attached to laws, that way ridiculous things like "no eating chocolate ice cream while riding bareback" don't sit on the books adding clutter.
You could even attach it to laws like murder, just be damned sure to re-instate it like clock-work or we all get a freebie day :).Two things in your post caught my eye.
'quickie" and "riding bareback".
That law could have a quite different meaning in today's lingua.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099198</id>
	<title>Everyone who votes...</title>
	<author>eth1</author>
	<datestamp>1265901840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...had better get themselves in the registry. You're "controlling" the government, after all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...had better get themselves in the registry .
You 're " controlling " the government , after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...had better get themselves in the registry.
You're "controlling" the government, after all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094250</id>
	<title>AIPAC count?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265035500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are foreign agents!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are foreign agents !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are foreign agents!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094324</id>
	<title>Civil War 2</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265035860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe they're just trying to round up an army for when they try to secede from the union again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they 're just trying to round up an army for when they try to secede from the union again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they're just trying to round up an army for when they try to secede from the union again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095786</id>
	<title>Whatever!</title>
	<author>HooliganIntellectual</author>
	<datestamp>1265046240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My anarchist friends are having a hoot over the stupidity of this law. One anarchist organization is already circulating a letter to South Carolina explaining why they won't be registering.</p><p>Somebody pointed out that the law as written is so vague that it actually mandates that the Democratic and Republican parties in South Carolina must register, since they are in favor of "controlling" and "conducting" the U.S. government. Are the Tea Party folks going to register, because they are advocating the ouster of President Obama?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My anarchist friends are having a hoot over the stupidity of this law .
One anarchist organization is already circulating a letter to South Carolina explaining why they wo n't be registering.Somebody pointed out that the law as written is so vague that it actually mandates that the Democratic and Republican parties in South Carolina must register , since they are in favor of " controlling " and " conducting " the U.S. government. Are the Tea Party folks going to register , because they are advocating the ouster of President Obama ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My anarchist friends are having a hoot over the stupidity of this law.
One anarchist organization is already circulating a letter to South Carolina explaining why they won't be registering.Somebody pointed out that the law as written is so vague that it actually mandates that the Democratic and Republican parties in South Carolina must register, since they are in favor of "controlling" and "conducting" the U.S. government. Are the Tea Party folks going to register, because they are advocating the ouster of President Obama?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097546</id>
	<title>Re:subversive?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265886720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://montypython.50webs.com/scripts/Series\_1/38.htm</p><p>'nuff said.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //montypython.50webs.com/scripts/Series \ _1/38.htm'nuff said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://montypython.50webs.com/scripts/Series\_1/38.htm'nuff said.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095048</id>
	<title>Letter from the editor...</title>
	<author>Schraegstrichpunkt</author>
	<datestamp>1265040420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Should I write "Updates" or "Obsoletes" <a href="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3514.txt" title="rfc-editor.org">RFC 3514</a> [rfc-editor.org]?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Should I write " Updates " or " Obsoletes " RFC 3514 [ rfc-editor.org ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Should I write "Updates" or "Obsoletes" RFC 3514 [rfc-editor.org]?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095244</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party and wiretaps...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265042160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> "...or other unlawful means;"</p><p>
&nbsp; You mean like their guy's warrantless wiretaps ??</p><p>
&nbsp; Then yes, R's gotta register.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...or other unlawful means ; "   You mean like their guy 's warrantless wiretaps ? ?
  Then yes , R 's got ta register .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext> "...or other unlawful means;"
  You mean like their guy's warrantless wiretaps ??
  Then yes, R's gotta register.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093774</id>
	<title>Like paying an illegal drug tax</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265033460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is just like those "marijuana tax stamp" acts.
Laws like that typicly just end up being used to tack
on extra years when you get convicted, and/or to assist
the prosecutors since the more laws you break the easier
it is to convict.  IMHO, it's a waste of time since
any serious act (ie, assault, murder) comitted by such a
group is going to get them life or worse (does SC have the death penalty?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is just like those " marijuana tax stamp " acts .
Laws like that typicly just end up being used to tack on extra years when you get convicted , and/or to assist the prosecutors since the more laws you break the easier it is to convict .
IMHO , it 's a waste of time since any serious act ( ie , assault , murder ) comitted by such a group is going to get them life or worse ( does SC have the death penalty ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is just like those "marijuana tax stamp" acts.
Laws like that typicly just end up being used to tack
on extra years when you get convicted, and/or to assist
the prosecutors since the more laws you break the easier
it is to convict.
IMHO, it's a waste of time since
any serious act (ie, assault, murder) comitted by such a
group is going to get them life or worse (does SC have the death penalty?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098260</id>
	<title>The biggest subversive group ...</title>
	<author>louzerr</author>
	<datestamp>1265895360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't this mean that ANY politician or political strategist would need to register?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't this mean that ANY politician or political strategist would need to register ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't this mean that ANY politician or political strategist would need to register?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094538</id>
	<title>Re:What's wrong with this picture?</title>
	<author>insufflate10mg</author>
	<datestamp>1265037000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are you retarded? Did you not read the last few words explaining that it must be done in a violent manner? Is voting violent? Idiot. And yes, I mean idiot, because only an idiot would read 49 words of a sentence and forgot the final 8.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you retarded ?
Did you not read the last few words explaining that it must be done in a violent manner ?
Is voting violent ?
Idiot. And yes , I mean idiot , because only an idiot would read 49 words of a sentence and forgot the final 8 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you retarded?
Did you not read the last few words explaining that it must be done in a violent manner?
Is voting violent?
Idiot. And yes, I mean idiot, because only an idiot would read 49 words of a sentence and forgot the final 8.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093924</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094850</id>
	<title>has South Carolina's scandalous governor registere</title>
	<author>swschrad</author>
	<datestamp>1265039100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>he's done more to overthrow his political party in the state than Wacko bin Looney ever did.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>he 's done more to overthrow his political party in the state than Wacko bin Looney ever did .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>he's done more to overthrow his political party in the state than Wacko bin Looney ever did.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093866</id>
	<title>What about the state government?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265033760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If I just want to overthrown the state of South Carolina's government, do I have to register? If so, then I think I'll do that first before making up my mind about the federal gov. It seems like less paperwork that way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If I just want to overthrown the state of South Carolina 's government , do I have to register ?
If so , then I think I 'll do that first before making up my mind about the federal gov .
It seems like less paperwork that way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I just want to overthrown the state of South Carolina's government, do I have to register?
If so, then I think I'll do that first before making up my mind about the federal gov.
It seems like less paperwork that way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096186</id>
	<title>Re:mmm yah.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265049720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Picking your pockets is more of a Democratic ideal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Picking your pockets is more of a Democratic ideal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Picking your pockets is more of a Democratic ideal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095670</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265045220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>A token enforcement merely to keep the law on the books would not be considered acceptable. A pattern of widespread enforcement of such a law would have to be demonstrated for it to be considered valid under such a provision.</i> </p><p>Yep, just like a trademark -- defend it or lose it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A token enforcement merely to keep the law on the books would not be considered acceptable .
A pattern of widespread enforcement of such a law would have to be demonstrated for it to be considered valid under such a provision .
Yep , just like a trademark -- defend it or lose it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A token enforcement merely to keep the law on the books would not be considered acceptable.
A pattern of widespread enforcement of such a law would have to be demonstrated for it to be considered valid under such a provision.
Yep, just like a trademark -- defend it or lose it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095886</id>
	<title>Re:That seems a bit Unconstitutional.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265047080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In case you haven't been paying attention, there are now 5 Republican supreme court justices to your 4 liberal justices.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In case you have n't been paying attention , there are now 5 Republican supreme court justices to your 4 liberal justices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In case you haven't been paying attention, there are now 5 Republican supreme court justices to your 4 liberal justices.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100166</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265906580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>or unlawful means.</p><p>meaning if they call you subversive, it makes you subversive, because you're breaking the law in self-fulfilling ways.</p><p>lol, captcha says 'radicals'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>or unlawful means.meaning if they call you subversive , it makes you subversive , because you 're breaking the law in self-fulfilling ways.lol , captcha says 'radicals'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or unlawful means.meaning if they call you subversive, it makes you subversive, because you're breaking the law in self-fulfilling ways.lol, captcha says 'radicals'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099684</id>
	<title>Consider the Source</title>
	<author>LifesABeach</author>
	<datestamp>1265904480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is the same state in the Union that Out-Sourced the <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=7954371&amp;page=1" title="go.com">Governor's Mistress.</a> [go.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the same state in the Union that Out-Sourced the Governor 's Mistress .
[ go.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the same state in the Union that Out-Sourced the Governor's Mistress.
[go.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099072</id>
	<title>Nice of them to keep the registration fee low</title>
	<author>Unsub</author>
	<datestamp>1265901060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>good way to help out those startup Subversive orgs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>good way to help out those startup Subversive orgs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>good way to help out those startup Subversive orgs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094792</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>TheVelvetFlamebait</author>
	<datestamp>1265038800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, it's the republican party's voters who are planning on overthrowing the existing government. Have they registered?</p><p>Well, if they're voting, then yes, actually.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , it 's the republican party 's voters who are planning on overthrowing the existing government .
Have they registered ? Well , if they 're voting , then yes , actually .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, it's the republican party's voters who are planning on overthrowing the existing government.
Have they registered?Well, if they're voting, then yes, actually.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094662</id>
	<title>Re:Look Out FOX NEWS</title>
	<author>deniable</author>
	<datestamp>1265037900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the Bill will fail.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the Bill will fail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the Bill will fail.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093672</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096562</id>
	<title>Next They will take your guns</title>
	<author>tg123</author>
	<datestamp>1265053800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Next they will make you<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...........<br><i>(shock,horror)</i> <b>hand in your guns.</b></p><p>I had to say it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Next they will make you ........... ( shock,horror ) hand in your guns.I had to say it ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next they will make you ...........(shock,horror) hand in your guns.I had to say it ;-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31101338</id>
	<title>Re:One state down, 49 more to go....</title>
	<author>digitalsushi</author>
	<datestamp>1265912460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NH would never pass this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NH would never pass this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NH would never pass this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094504</id>
	<title>Re:Like paying an illegal drug tax</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265036820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is just like those "marijuana tax stamp" acts. Laws like that typicly just end up being used to tack on extra years when you get convicted, and/or to assist the prosecutors since the more laws you break the easier it is to convict.)</p></div><p>We have had a law like that here in Texas for quite some time now and I believe the intent was, much as you have said, a way to tack on years/add charges to assist prosecution.  Many years ago, some time after the law was passed, a man was arrested for selling marijuana.  The man had purchased the required tax stamps and the tax stamps were affixed to each bag of marijuana that was seized.</p><p>In court the man argued that since he had paid the marijuana tax he was not breaking the law by selling the marijuana.  The judge ended up agreeing with the man.  IIRC the ruling was to the effect that since the state had accepted the money for the marijuana tax stamps and had sold the man the marijuana tax stamps then the state wasn't entitled to arrest the man for selling the marijuana which he had paid the required state taxes on.</p><p>I don't recall seeing another case like it but I do remember this one since I got a good laugh out of it at the time.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is just like those " marijuana tax stamp " acts .
Laws like that typicly just end up being used to tack on extra years when you get convicted , and/or to assist the prosecutors since the more laws you break the easier it is to convict .
) We have had a law like that here in Texas for quite some time now and I believe the intent was , much as you have said , a way to tack on years/add charges to assist prosecution .
Many years ago , some time after the law was passed , a man was arrested for selling marijuana .
The man had purchased the required tax stamps and the tax stamps were affixed to each bag of marijuana that was seized.In court the man argued that since he had paid the marijuana tax he was not breaking the law by selling the marijuana .
The judge ended up agreeing with the man .
IIRC the ruling was to the effect that since the state had accepted the money for the marijuana tax stamps and had sold the man the marijuana tax stamps then the state was n't entitled to arrest the man for selling the marijuana which he had paid the required state taxes on.I do n't recall seeing another case like it but I do remember this one since I got a good laugh out of it at the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is just like those "marijuana tax stamp" acts.
Laws like that typicly just end up being used to tack on extra years when you get convicted, and/or to assist the prosecutors since the more laws you break the easier it is to convict.
)We have had a law like that here in Texas for quite some time now and I believe the intent was, much as you have said, a way to tack on years/add charges to assist prosecution.
Many years ago, some time after the law was passed, a man was arrested for selling marijuana.
The man had purchased the required tax stamps and the tax stamps were affixed to each bag of marijuana that was seized.In court the man argued that since he had paid the marijuana tax he was not breaking the law by selling the marijuana.
The judge ended up agreeing with the man.
IIRC the ruling was to the effect that since the state had accepted the money for the marijuana tax stamps and had sold the man the marijuana tax stamps then the state wasn't entitled to arrest the man for selling the marijuana which he had paid the required state taxes on.I don't recall seeing another case like it but I do remember this one since I got a good laugh out of it at the time.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095966</id>
	<title>Re:One state down, 49 more to go....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265047560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I can see other states passing laws such as this. I would think that if you were planning on overthrowing the government, doing so "legally" by registering your intent probably wouldn't seem like the brightest idea.</p></div><p>Some states tried this trick with Pot, by requiring a "Marijuana Tax Stamp" so they could nail them for unpaid taxes/evasion as well as possession/distribution. It backfired, big-time.</p><p>You see, by granting a license or tax stamp, the government is actually giving you the OK to perform the activity. This is why your local pharmacy can dispense medications that contain cocaine, meth, opiates, narcotics, etc. and why you can legally buy &amp; possess them if you have the right license (we call it a "prescription").<br>So the courts ruled that if you had the stamps you couldn't be prosecuted, since you were complying with the law. So then the jackasses decided "hey, we'll just not give the stamps out", which the courts then ruled was also a violation of the law; if you are going to require a license, you have to grant them (even if only on a limited basis). In the end, the states that tried this trick changed their tune, quick.</p><p>So under the same logic/precedence, if you do register as a subverssive group, then you can legally use illegal means to do all those things. I highly doubt this type of dipshit legislation will stick around very long.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can see other states passing laws such as this .
I would think that if you were planning on overthrowing the government , doing so " legally " by registering your intent probably would n't seem like the brightest idea.Some states tried this trick with Pot , by requiring a " Marijuana Tax Stamp " so they could nail them for unpaid taxes/evasion as well as possession/distribution .
It backfired , big-time.You see , by granting a license or tax stamp , the government is actually giving you the OK to perform the activity .
This is why your local pharmacy can dispense medications that contain cocaine , meth , opiates , narcotics , etc .
and why you can legally buy &amp; possess them if you have the right license ( we call it a " prescription " ) .So the courts ruled that if you had the stamps you could n't be prosecuted , since you were complying with the law .
So then the jackasses decided " hey , we 'll just not give the stamps out " , which the courts then ruled was also a violation of the law ; if you are going to require a license , you have to grant them ( even if only on a limited basis ) .
In the end , the states that tried this trick changed their tune , quick.So under the same logic/precedence , if you do register as a subverssive group , then you can legally use illegal means to do all those things .
I highly doubt this type of dipshit legislation will stick around very long .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can see other states passing laws such as this.
I would think that if you were planning on overthrowing the government, doing so "legally" by registering your intent probably wouldn't seem like the brightest idea.Some states tried this trick with Pot, by requiring a "Marijuana Tax Stamp" so they could nail them for unpaid taxes/evasion as well as possession/distribution.
It backfired, big-time.You see, by granting a license or tax stamp, the government is actually giving you the OK to perform the activity.
This is why your local pharmacy can dispense medications that contain cocaine, meth, opiates, narcotics, etc.
and why you can legally buy &amp; possess them if you have the right license (we call it a "prescription").So the courts ruled that if you had the stamps you couldn't be prosecuted, since you were complying with the law.
So then the jackasses decided "hey, we'll just not give the stamps out", which the courts then ruled was also a violation of the law; if you are going to require a license, you have to grant them (even if only on a limited basis).
In the end, the states that tried this trick changed their tune, quick.So under the same logic/precedence, if you do register as a subverssive group, then you can legally use illegal means to do all those things.
I highly doubt this type of dipshit legislation will stick around very long.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093660</id>
	<title>Was ist das, das sie hier lesen</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265032920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt><br>Judenbucher!<br><br>Abfuhren!<br><br>$25,000 fine and 10 years of Guantanamo Bay for you!<br><br>Whats left of this democracy and freedom thing America was supposed to be about?</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>Judenbucher ! Abfuhren ! $ 25,000 fine and 10 years of Guantanamo Bay for you ! Whats left of this democracy and freedom thing America was supposed to be about ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Judenbucher!Abfuhren!$25,000 fine and 10 years of Guantanamo Bay for you!Whats left of this democracy and freedom thing America was supposed to be about?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094480</id>
	<title>Re:Didn't RTFA</title>
	<author>insufflate10mg</author>
	<datestamp>1265036580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the stupidity lies within the selective readers who have no problem reading, analyzing, and interpreting what you quoted, but gloss right over the last several words requiring it be in a VIOLENT MANNER.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the stupidity lies within the selective readers who have no problem reading , analyzing , and interpreting what you quoted , but gloss right over the last several words requiring it be in a VIOLENT MANNER .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the stupidity lies within the selective readers who have no problem reading, analyzing, and interpreting what you quoted, but gloss right over the last several words requiring it be in a VIOLENT MANNER.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095596</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>b4upoo</author>
	<datestamp>1265044620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>    I think such a law is absurd. Obviously most political candidates want to change the current way that government works. This new law tries to address violent over throw of government. But revolutionaries will never register. This law is a waste of the paper it is printed on and a waste of tax payer monies as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think such a law is absurd .
Obviously most political candidates want to change the current way that government works .
This new law tries to address violent over throw of government .
But revolutionaries will never register .
This law is a waste of the paper it is printed on and a waste of tax payer monies as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>    I think such a law is absurd.
Obviously most political candidates want to change the current way that government works.
This new law tries to address violent over throw of government.
But revolutionaries will never register.
This law is a waste of the paper it is printed on and a waste of tax payer monies as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095736</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265045820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A constitutional provision is one thing, such as procedures for impeachment or something that is rarely invoked for a good reason...</p></div><p>Ah, who decides what is a good reason?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A constitutional provision is one thing , such as procedures for impeachment or something that is rarely invoked for a good reason...Ah , who decides what is a good reason ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A constitutional provision is one thing, such as procedures for impeachment or something that is rarely invoked for a good reason...Ah, who decides what is a good reason?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097520</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265886480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unlawful means does include using any unlawfully acquired funds to advertise your party. Failing to properly publish the sources of your "campaign contributions" now may lead to a 10 year jail sentence.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unlawful means does include using any unlawfully acquired funds to advertise your party .
Failing to properly publish the sources of your " campaign contributions " now may lead to a 10 year jail sentence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unlawful means does include using any unlawfully acquired funds to advertise your party.
Failing to properly publish the sources of your "campaign contributions" now may lead to a 10 year jail sentence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094784</id>
	<title>I'm a member ...</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1265038740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... of an organization with founding documents that states:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>That whenever any Form of
Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the
People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying
its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form,
as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.</p></div><p>So I guess I've got to register, right?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... of an organization with founding documents that states : That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends , it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it , and to institute new Government , laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form , as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.So I guess I 've got to register , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... of an organization with founding documents that states:That whenever any Form of
Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the
People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying
its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form,
as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.So I guess I've got to register, right?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31108046</id>
	<title>And...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265896260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have all members of both political parties, all representitives of the RIAA and MPAA registered yet?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have all members of both political parties , all representitives of the RIAA and MPAA registered yet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have all members of both political parties, all representitives of the RIAA and MPAA registered yet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093826</id>
	<title>Easy way to catch them</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265033640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Rumor has it that they have a similar law on the books in Texas: thieves are required to give homeowners 24 hours' notice of their intended break-in, or else they face a fine. Whether it exists or not, I don't actually know, but the idea behind it is that if nothing else sticks, at least they can get the person on a charge like that. I'm assuming the same applies here. They want some way to get the groups if nothing else is gonna stick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rumor has it that they have a similar law on the books in Texas : thieves are required to give homeowners 24 hours ' notice of their intended break-in , or else they face a fine .
Whether it exists or not , I do n't actually know , but the idea behind it is that if nothing else sticks , at least they can get the person on a charge like that .
I 'm assuming the same applies here .
They want some way to get the groups if nothing else is gon na stick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rumor has it that they have a similar law on the books in Texas: thieves are required to give homeowners 24 hours' notice of their intended break-in, or else they face a fine.
Whether it exists or not, I don't actually know, but the idea behind it is that if nothing else sticks, at least they can get the person on a charge like that.
I'm assuming the same applies here.
They want some way to get the groups if nothing else is gonna stick.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093718</id>
	<title>Murderers, bank robbers, and rapists too.</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1265033220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you intend to do anything illegal you must register. If you litter and have not registered your intention to litter we're going to come down hard on you! Planning to kill your spouse? Register now, and get 20\% off your sentence! Planning to rob a bank? Registration before Feb 15th gives you 10\% off your sentence. Planning a terrorist act? Just call 1-900-TERR-RIST, and we'll go easy on you if you don't make it right away to your chosen form of heaven.</p><p>Seriously, what kind of bass awkwards government scheme is this? If your penalties for commiting a crime are too lax, tighten them. Otherwise expecting people to register their intention of breaking the law (and inciting the overthrow of the government isn't just simple free speech folks. If you think it is maybe you're so messed up this law will work on you) is pure nonsense.</p><p>The muppets coming up with this should be....oh wait I'd have to register to say that....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you intend to do anything illegal you must register .
If you litter and have not registered your intention to litter we 're going to come down hard on you !
Planning to kill your spouse ?
Register now , and get 20 \ % off your sentence !
Planning to rob a bank ?
Registration before Feb 15th gives you 10 \ % off your sentence .
Planning a terrorist act ?
Just call 1-900-TERR-RIST , and we 'll go easy on you if you do n't make it right away to your chosen form of heaven.Seriously , what kind of bass awkwards government scheme is this ?
If your penalties for commiting a crime are too lax , tighten them .
Otherwise expecting people to register their intention of breaking the law ( and inciting the overthrow of the government is n't just simple free speech folks .
If you think it is maybe you 're so messed up this law will work on you ) is pure nonsense.The muppets coming up with this should be....oh wait I 'd have to register to say that... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you intend to do anything illegal you must register.
If you litter and have not registered your intention to litter we're going to come down hard on you!
Planning to kill your spouse?
Register now, and get 20\% off your sentence!
Planning to rob a bank?
Registration before Feb 15th gives you 10\% off your sentence.
Planning a terrorist act?
Just call 1-900-TERR-RIST, and we'll go easy on you if you don't make it right away to your chosen form of heaven.Seriously, what kind of bass awkwards government scheme is this?
If your penalties for commiting a crime are too lax, tighten them.
Otherwise expecting people to register their intention of breaking the law (and inciting the overthrow of the government isn't just simple free speech folks.
If you think it is maybe you're so messed up this law will work on you) is pure nonsense.The muppets coming up with this should be....oh wait I'd have to register to say that....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093594</id>
	<title>Too bad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265032740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>No one thought to do this pre 9/11.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No one thought to do this pre 9/11 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No one thought to do this pre 9/11.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094426</id>
	<title>Sounds like the Smith Act again</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265036280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith\_Act" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">The Smith Act</a> [wikipedia.org] was a similar federal law that was used in 1949-50 to imprison 11 leaders of the Communist Party USA. The convictions were later declared unconstitutional, after the 11 defendants had already served several years in prison.</p><p>I suspect that the real target of this law is not "terrorists" but leftists. The left in the US is tiny, and this law is meant to keep it that way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Smith Act [ wikipedia.org ] was a similar federal law that was used in 1949-50 to imprison 11 leaders of the Communist Party USA .
The convictions were later declared unconstitutional , after the 11 defendants had already served several years in prison.I suspect that the real target of this law is not " terrorists " but leftists .
The left in the US is tiny , and this law is meant to keep it that way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Smith Act [wikipedia.org] was a similar federal law that was used in 1949-50 to imprison 11 leaders of the Communist Party USA.
The convictions were later declared unconstitutional, after the 11 defendants had already served several years in prison.I suspect that the real target of this law is not "terrorists" but leftists.
The left in the US is tiny, and this law is meant to keep it that way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095570</id>
	<title>what the applications really look like</title>
	<author>ffflala</author>
	<datestamp>1265044500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dear South Carolina,</p><p>As requested, we hereby notify you that we are a "Subversive organization"  --a corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons. We hope to directly or indirectly advocate, advise, teach or practice the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government the State of South Carolina and any political subdivision thereof by unlawful means.</p><p>Specifically, we wish to advocate doing so by (1) collecting money from business organizations, then (2) using this money to support the campaign efforts of a sufficient number of elected officials to obtain majority influence over the elected branches of the Government of South Carolina. We will solicit and accept donations from corporations subject to foreign control, such as Sonoco Products, SCANA Corporation, Bowater, Inc., and other corporate entities with major investments in both South Carolina and the rest of the world. They do not have to be Fortune 500 companies! We're willing to include profitable corporations of any size, regardless of the national allegiances of their stockholders, board members, or executives.</p><p>We will, by funding the continuation of the careers of elected officials in the State of South Carolina, hope to directly or indirectly influence them to pursue policies favorable to the business interests of our donors, particularly when these interests conflict with the rights provided in the constitutions of the State of Carolina and the United States. As we anticipate that these conflicts will be of a constitutional nature, this should suffice to be unlawful enough to warrant registration under your recent legislation. Hopefully you will find this suitably subversive.</p><p>Included with our registration fee you will find a 15\% gratuity. Please consider this a token of our appreciation of your ongoing efforts to make the realization of our goals easier.</p><p>Looking forward to seeing you at the President's Day golf outing. Looks like the weather will keep us in the clubhouse!</p><p>Toodles,</p><p>-The Old Boy Network</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear South Carolina,As requested , we hereby notify you that we are a " Subversive organization " --a corporation , society , association , camp , group , bund , political party , assembly , body or organization , composed of two or more persons .
We hope to directly or indirectly advocate , advise , teach or practice the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government the State of South Carolina and any political subdivision thereof by unlawful means.Specifically , we wish to advocate doing so by ( 1 ) collecting money from business organizations , then ( 2 ) using this money to support the campaign efforts of a sufficient number of elected officials to obtain majority influence over the elected branches of the Government of South Carolina .
We will solicit and accept donations from corporations subject to foreign control , such as Sonoco Products , SCANA Corporation , Bowater , Inc. , and other corporate entities with major investments in both South Carolina and the rest of the world .
They do not have to be Fortune 500 companies !
We 're willing to include profitable corporations of any size , regardless of the national allegiances of their stockholders , board members , or executives.We will , by funding the continuation of the careers of elected officials in the State of South Carolina , hope to directly or indirectly influence them to pursue policies favorable to the business interests of our donors , particularly when these interests conflict with the rights provided in the constitutions of the State of Carolina and the United States .
As we anticipate that these conflicts will be of a constitutional nature , this should suffice to be unlawful enough to warrant registration under your recent legislation .
Hopefully you will find this suitably subversive.Included with our registration fee you will find a 15 \ % gratuity .
Please consider this a token of our appreciation of your ongoing efforts to make the realization of our goals easier.Looking forward to seeing you at the President 's Day golf outing .
Looks like the weather will keep us in the clubhouse ! Toodles,-The Old Boy Network</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear South Carolina,As requested, we hereby notify you that we are a "Subversive organization"  --a corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons.
We hope to directly or indirectly advocate, advise, teach or practice the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government the State of South Carolina and any political subdivision thereof by unlawful means.Specifically, we wish to advocate doing so by (1) collecting money from business organizations, then (2) using this money to support the campaign efforts of a sufficient number of elected officials to obtain majority influence over the elected branches of the Government of South Carolina.
We will solicit and accept donations from corporations subject to foreign control, such as Sonoco Products, SCANA Corporation, Bowater, Inc., and other corporate entities with major investments in both South Carolina and the rest of the world.
They do not have to be Fortune 500 companies!
We're willing to include profitable corporations of any size, regardless of the national allegiances of their stockholders, board members, or executives.We will, by funding the continuation of the careers of elected officials in the State of South Carolina, hope to directly or indirectly influence them to pursue policies favorable to the business interests of our donors, particularly when these interests conflict with the rights provided in the constitutions of the State of Carolina and the United States.
As we anticipate that these conflicts will be of a constitutional nature, this should suffice to be unlawful enough to warrant registration under your recent legislation.
Hopefully you will find this suitably subversive.Included with our registration fee you will find a 15\% gratuity.
Please consider this a token of our appreciation of your ongoing efforts to make the realization of our goals easier.Looking forward to seeing you at the President's Day golf outing.
Looks like the weather will keep us in the clubhouse!Toodles,-The Old Boy Network</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096862</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265921280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>The tea partiers are getting that way, my friend.</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>The tea partiers are getting that way , my friend .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The tea partiers are getting that way, my friend.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099960</id>
	<title>Re:Can I mail it in or what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265905620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, is there like a website where you can sign up? Scandinavia is very interested in recolonizing America.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , is there like a website where you can sign up ?
Scandinavia is very interested in recolonizing America .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, is there like a website where you can sign up?
Scandinavia is very interested in recolonizing America.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093614</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098168</id>
	<title>Re:How about groups wanting to overthrow the SC go</title>
	<author>cvtan</author>
	<datestamp>1265894340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm really sorry I went to that site.  I'm going to have bad dreams like after the first time I saw a Godzilla movie.  Every time I looked out a window at night I thought I saw a T-rex staring back at me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm really sorry I went to that site .
I 'm going to have bad dreams like after the first time I saw a Godzilla movie .
Every time I looked out a window at night I thought I saw a T-rex staring back at me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm really sorry I went to that site.
I'm going to have bad dreams like after the first time I saw a Godzilla movie.
Every time I looked out a window at night I thought I saw a T-rex staring back at me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095212</id>
	<title>This law brought to you....</title>
	<author>Hasai</author>
	<datestamp>1265041860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>....by the same state that put George "Dubyuh" Bush on the path to become America's 43rd president.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>....by the same state that put George " Dubyuh " Bush on the path to become America 's 43rd president .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>....by the same state that put George "Dubyuh" Bush on the path to become America's 43rd president.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095040</id>
	<title>Re:Awwwww crap!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265040420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So given the assembly of slashdot members and the politcal views shared, are all the South Carolina members going to be hit up with a fine/jail ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So given the assembly of slashdot members and the politcal views shared , are all the South Carolina members going to be hit up with a fine/jail ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So given the assembly of slashdot members and the politcal views shared, are all the South Carolina members going to be hit up with a fine/jail ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093768</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265033400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sometimes I really think Americans are nuts. If I have plans to overthrow Government Why will I register to the Government I want to overthrow. Come one Joe sometimes irrationality plays in your legislation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sometimes I really think Americans are nuts .
If I have plans to overthrow Government Why will I register to the Government I want to overthrow .
Come one Joe sometimes irrationality plays in your legislation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sometimes I really think Americans are nuts.
If I have plans to overthrow Government Why will I register to the Government I want to overthrow.
Come one Joe sometimes irrationality plays in your legislation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094778</id>
	<title>Re:One state down, 49 more to go....</title>
	<author>galego</author>
	<datestamp>1265038680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>OK<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... let's break this down<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..
<p>"(1) "Subversive organization" means every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... </p><ul>
<li>controlling - <strong>lobbyists, right?</strong></li>
<li>conducting - <strong>lobbyists and defense contractors</strong></li>
<li>seizing - <strong>either party in an election year, year before an election year<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... or these days, the day after the election we just had.</strong></li>
<li>overthrowing the government of the United States - <strong>what the hell does that mean!?!?!?!?</strong></li>
</ul><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...
</p><p>
But in the end<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I think this (bolded) is the important part:<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... of this State or of any political subdivision thereof<strong> by force or violence or other unlawful means</strong>
</p><p>
So<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. in the end, it's just a virtual turing stupidity test; An easy way to round up the bottom feeder idiot anarchists/communists/whatever-ists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK ... let 's break this down . . " ( 1 ) " Subversive organization " means every corporation , society , association , camp , group , bund , political party , assembly , body or organization , composed of two or more persons , which directly or indirectly advocates , advises , teaches or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of .. . controlling - lobbyists , right ?
conducting - lobbyists and defense contractors seizing - either party in an election year , year before an election year ... or these days , the day after the election we just had .
overthrowing the government of the United States - what the hell does that mean ! ? ! ? ! ? ! ?
.. . But in the end ... I think this ( bolded ) is the important part : ... of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means So .. in the end , it 's just a virtual turing stupidity test ; An easy way to round up the bottom feeder idiot anarchists/communists/whatever-ists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK ... let's break this down ..
"(1) "Subversive organization" means every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of ... 
controlling - lobbyists, right?
conducting - lobbyists and defense contractors
seizing - either party in an election year, year before an election year ... or these days, the day after the election we just had.
overthrowing the government of the United States - what the hell does that mean!?!?!?!?
...

But in the end ... I think this (bolded) is the important part: ... of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means

So .. in the end, it's just a virtual turing stupidity test; An easy way to round up the bottom feeder idiot anarchists/communists/whatever-ists.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100116</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>Richy\_T</author>
	<datestamp>1265906400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would be nice. But the government would just start each year with a vote on renewing all laws previously enacted that would pass unanimously.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be nice .
But the government would just start each year with a vote on renewing all laws previously enacted that would pass unanimously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be nice.
But the government would just start each year with a vote on renewing all laws previously enacted that would pass unanimously.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093638</id>
	<title>Awwwww crap!</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1265032860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought my evil master plan for overthrowing the government was PERFECT! Nobody could have known what I was up to!</p><p>And now I have to tell them myself?</p><p>Oh well...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought my evil master plan for overthrowing the government was PERFECT !
Nobody could have known what I was up to ! And now I have to tell them myself ? Oh well.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought my evil master plan for overthrowing the government was PERFECT!
Nobody could have known what I was up to!And now I have to tell them myself?Oh well...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31102584</id>
	<title>Re:Murderers, bank robbers, and rapists too.</title>
	<author>2obvious4u</author>
	<datestamp>1265917500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't they already do something similar to catch people with warrants?  I've heard about them offering free TV's and stuff and when they show up they get arrested.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't they already do something similar to catch people with warrants ?
I 've heard about them offering free TV 's and stuff and when they show up they get arrested .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't they already do something similar to catch people with warrants?
I've heard about them offering free TV's and stuff and when they show up they get arrested.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097596</id>
	<title>Re:New laws</title>
	<author>foxylad</author>
	<datestamp>1265887140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What we REALLY need is a new law that makes it illegal to illegally do illegal stuff!</p><p>But wait... I smell recursion...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What we REALLY need is a new law that makes it illegal to illegally do illegal stuff ! But wait... I smell recursion.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What we REALLY need is a new law that makes it illegal to illegally do illegal stuff!But wait... I smell recursion...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093800</id>
	<title>Ironic</title>
	<author>dustman81</author>
	<datestamp>1265033520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I seem to remember from school that a historically significant event happened in South Carolina that started a war....oh, right. The Battle of Fort Sumter which started the American Civil War.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I seem to remember from school that a historically significant event happened in South Carolina that started a war....oh , right .
The Battle of Fort Sumter which started the American Civil War .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I seem to remember from school that a historically significant event happened in South Carolina that started a war....oh, right.
The Battle of Fort Sumter which started the American Civil War.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096468</id>
	<title>Er...</title>
	<author>YankDownUnder</author>
	<datestamp>1265052600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does it matter if you don't live in the state of South Carolina?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it matter if you do n't live in the state of South Carolina ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it matter if you don't live in the state of South Carolina?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093948</id>
	<title>Lobbyist Groups?</title>
	<author>GrubLord</author>
	<datestamp>1265034120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFA - this is any group that "directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States".</p><p>Lobbyist groups are all about controlling the government (via substantial bribes). Does this mean they need to register?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA - this is any group that " directly or indirectly advocates , advises , teaches or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States " .Lobbyist groups are all about controlling the government ( via substantial bribes ) .
Does this mean they need to register ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA - this is any group that "directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States".Lobbyist groups are all about controlling the government (via substantial bribes).
Does this mean they need to register?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095334</id>
	<title>Secessionism</title>
	<author>MillionthMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1265042820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess this means secessionist groups must now register in South Carolina.<br> <br>What is this world coming to?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess this means secessionist groups must now register in South Carolina .
What is this world coming to ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess this means secessionist groups must now register in South Carolina.
What is this world coming to?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094334</id>
	<title>Was i really the only one who thought "Subversion"</title>
	<author>cnkurzke</author>
	<datestamp>1265035860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>first thought: who's still using Subversion when we have GIT-Hub??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>first thought : who 's still using Subversion when we have GIT-Hub ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>first thought: who's still using Subversion when we have GIT-Hub?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094204</id>
	<title>all orgs under foreign control???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265035260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>right...</p><p>good luck getting aipac members registered as a subversive group or even getting this org, tantamount to a fifth column, declared as "foreign controlled"...</p><p>and don't give me that "anti-semitic" sh*t, i'm half-jewish and have no tolerance for actual judeophobia.</p><p>ac</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>right...good luck getting aipac members registered as a subversive group or even getting this org , tantamount to a fifth column , declared as " foreign controlled " ...and do n't give me that " anti-semitic " sh * t , i 'm half-jewish and have no tolerance for actual judeophobia.ac</tokentext>
<sentencetext>right...good luck getting aipac members registered as a subversive group or even getting this org, tantamount to a fifth column, declared as "foreign controlled"...and don't give me that "anti-semitic" sh*t, i'm half-jewish and have no tolerance for actual judeophobia.ac</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094062</id>
	<title>Re:Awwwww crap!</title>
	<author>Jesus\_666</author>
	<datestamp>1265034660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not that big a deal. Just don't enter the United States until after you've put them into your unescapable death trap, at which point you'll naturally disclose your evil plan to them anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not that big a deal .
Just do n't enter the United States until after you 've put them into your unescapable death trap , at which point you 'll naturally disclose your evil plan to them anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not that big a deal.
Just don't enter the United States until after you've put them into your unescapable death trap, at which point you'll naturally disclose your evil plan to them anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097698</id>
	<title>Are they stupid?</title>
	<author>jandersen</author>
	<datestamp>1265888220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, we already know that, don't we?</p><p>But what kind of idiotic law is that? Do they expect that "subversive elements" will now come out in the open and get registered? Isn't that a bit like asking people on the plane whether they are terrorists?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , we already know that , do n't we ? But what kind of idiotic law is that ?
Do they expect that " subversive elements " will now come out in the open and get registered ?
Is n't that a bit like asking people on the plane whether they are terrorists ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, we already know that, don't we?But what kind of idiotic law is that?
Do they expect that "subversive elements" will now come out in the open and get registered?
Isn't that a bit like asking people on the plane whether they are terrorists?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099768</id>
	<title>Nothing dangerous about that</title>
	<author>guruevi</author>
	<datestamp>1265904780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>every person who <b>advocates, teaches, advises</b> or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of <b>controlling</b>, conducting, seizing or <b>overthrowing</b> the government of the United States</i></p><p>Emphasis added. Who has to register:</p><p>- Anyone who runs for President or another political office.<br>- Anyone who votes<br>- Anyone who has a religion/spirituality based in Millenarianism/Revelationism (according to Wikipedia):</p><ul><li>Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University</li><li><br>Branch Davidians</li><li><br>Dulcinianism</li><li><br>Earth changes</li><li><br>Fifth Monarchy Men</li><li><br>The Heaven's Gate cult</li><li><br>Hojjatieh</li><li><br>The Native American Ghost Dance</li><li><br>Jehovah's Witnesses</li><li><br>Joachimites</li><li><br>Judaism</li><li><br>The Living Church of God</li><li><br>Lord Our Righteousness Church</li><li><br>The Lord's Resistance Army</li><li><br>Millerism</li><li><br>Nostradamus</li><li><br>Plymouth Brethren</li><li><br>Rastafari movement</li><li><br>Shakers</li><li><br>Taiping Rebellion</li><li><br>The Turner Diaries</li><li><br>Yellow Turbans</li><li><br>2012 Doomsday Prediction</li></ul><p>No, I don't see nothing wrong with this new law. It's very constitutional.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>every person who advocates , teaches , advises or practices the duty , necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government of the United StatesEmphasis added .
Who has to register : - Anyone who runs for President or another political office.- Anyone who votes- Anyone who has a religion/spirituality based in Millenarianism/Revelationism ( according to Wikipedia ) : Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual UniversityBranch DavidiansDulcinianismEarth changesFifth Monarchy MenThe Heaven 's Gate cultHojjatiehThe Native American Ghost DanceJehovah 's WitnessesJoachimitesJudaismThe Living Church of GodLord Our Righteousness ChurchThe Lord 's Resistance ArmyMillerismNostradamusPlymouth BrethrenRastafari movementShakersTaiping RebellionThe Turner DiariesYellow Turbans2012 Doomsday PredictionNo , I do n't see nothing wrong with this new law .
It 's very constitutional .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United StatesEmphasis added.
Who has to register:- Anyone who runs for President or another political office.- Anyone who votes- Anyone who has a religion/spirituality based in Millenarianism/Revelationism (according to Wikipedia):Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual UniversityBranch DavidiansDulcinianismEarth changesFifth Monarchy MenThe Heaven's Gate cultHojjatiehThe Native American Ghost DanceJehovah's WitnessesJoachimitesJudaismThe Living Church of GodLord Our Righteousness ChurchThe Lord's Resistance ArmyMillerismNostradamusPlymouth BrethrenRastafari movementShakersTaiping RebellionThe Turner DiariesYellow Turbans2012 Doomsday PredictionNo, I don't see nothing wrong with this new law.
It's very constitutional.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093654</id>
	<title>Register Here!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265032920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If any home grown yokels actually register, they deserve all that they will get from the Federal Government. It brings to mind those questions on customs forms about having certain items.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If any home grown yokels actually register , they deserve all that they will get from the Federal Government .
It brings to mind those questions on customs forms about having certain items .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If any home grown yokels actually register, they deserve all that they will get from the Federal Government.
It brings to mind those questions on customs forms about having certain items.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094096</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265034840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For some of them, it's <a href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2007/240707fascistcoup.htm" title="prisonplanet.com" rel="nofollow"> in their genes</a> [prisonplanet.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For some of them , it 's in their genes [ prisonplanet.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For some of them, it's  in their genes [prisonplanet.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096380</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265051700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <b> other unlawful means;</b>"</p></div><p> So no more smear campaigns before elections? Or illegal fundraising? (Maybe they just waited until they removed the cap on funding before they put it in effect or did they push for the cap removal so they wouldnt get on the list?)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>other unlawful means ; " So no more smear campaigns before elections ?
Or illegal fundraising ?
( Maybe they just waited until they removed the cap on funding before they put it in effect or did they push for the cap removal so they wouldnt get on the list ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  other unlawful means;" So no more smear campaigns before elections?
Or illegal fundraising?
(Maybe they just waited until they removed the cap on funding before they put it in effect or did they push for the cap removal so they wouldnt get on the list?
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094110</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>kestasjk</author>
	<datestamp>1265034900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You do need to register to get elected of course, but I doubt getting elected fits SCs definition of "overthrow" (or anyone elses)</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do need to register to get elected of course , but I doubt getting elected fits SCs definition of " overthrow " ( or anyone elses )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do need to register to get elected of course, but I doubt getting elected fits SCs definition of "overthrow" (or anyone elses)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094054</id>
	<title>All Catholics must register as subversives</title>
	<author>michaelmalak</author>
	<datestamp>1265034600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Catechism of the Catholic Church summarizes the tenets of faith and is binding upon all Catholics. Thus, given the text of <a href="http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/2243.htm" title="scborromeo.org">paragraph 2243</a> [scborromeo.org] of the Catechism, it would seem that all Catholics in South Carolina must register as "subversives":<blockquote><div><p>Armed resistance to oppression by political authority is not legitimate, unless all the following conditions are met:<br>1. there is certain, grave, and prolonged violation of fundamental rights;<br>2. all other means of redress have been exhausted;<br>3. such resistance will not provoke worse disorders;<br>4. there is well-founded hope of success; and<br>5. it is impossible reasonably to foresee any better solution.</p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Catechism of the Catholic Church summarizes the tenets of faith and is binding upon all Catholics .
Thus , given the text of paragraph 2243 [ scborromeo.org ] of the Catechism , it would seem that all Catholics in South Carolina must register as " subversives " : Armed resistance to oppression by political authority is not legitimate , unless all the following conditions are met : 1. there is certain , grave , and prolonged violation of fundamental rights ; 2. all other means of redress have been exhausted ; 3. such resistance will not provoke worse disorders ; 4. there is well-founded hope of success ; and5 .
it is impossible reasonably to foresee any better solution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Catechism of the Catholic Church summarizes the tenets of faith and is binding upon all Catholics.
Thus, given the text of paragraph 2243 [scborromeo.org] of the Catechism, it would seem that all Catholics in South Carolina must register as "subversives":Armed resistance to oppression by political authority is not legitimate, unless all the following conditions are met:1. there is certain, grave, and prolonged violation of fundamental rights;2. all other means of redress have been exhausted;3. such resistance will not provoke worse disorders;4. there is well-founded hope of success; and5.
it is impossible reasonably to foresee any better solution. 
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098932</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>tverbeek</author>
	<datestamp>1265900460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The last thing we need is for law enforcement to periodically (figuratively) screw some poor sodomite just so they can keep the law against (literally) doing so in their toolkit.</p><p>That's what this law (and a lot of criminal law) is for: another book to throw at someone, in case the others miss or don't hurt him enough to satisfy them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The last thing we need is for law enforcement to periodically ( figuratively ) screw some poor sodomite just so they can keep the law against ( literally ) doing so in their toolkit.That 's what this law ( and a lot of criminal law ) is for : another book to throw at someone , in case the others miss or do n't hurt him enough to satisfy them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The last thing we need is for law enforcement to periodically (figuratively) screw some poor sodomite just so they can keep the law against (literally) doing so in their toolkit.That's what this law (and a lot of criminal law) is for: another book to throw at someone, in case the others miss or don't hurt him enough to satisfy them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100428</id>
	<title>Re:First and Last solution?</title>
	<author>robinstar1574</author>
	<datestamp>1265907660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>The only problem with that is the idiots in congress would become overwhelmed with renewals and be less able to rob us of our precious goods. Think like an idiot, idiot.</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only problem with that is the idiots in congress would become overwhelmed with renewals and be less able to rob us of our precious goods .
Think like an idiot , idiot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only problem with that is the idiots in congress would become overwhelmed with renewals and be less able to rob us of our precious goods.
Think like an idiot, idiot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095566</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094514</id>
	<title>It's time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265036880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It seems to me that right about the time a government passes such a ridiculous law it's time for it to be overthrown.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems to me that right about the time a government passes such a ridiculous law it 's time for it to be overthrown .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems to me that right about the time a government passes such a ridiculous law it's time for it to be overthrown.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31131724</id>
	<title>the governments of the US and of South Carolina...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266073320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...have already overthrown the legitimate governments by unlawful means.  After all, most of the laws they write and which are enforced are clearly unconstitutional.  Can  this new law be used to put all our congresscritters and such in jail?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...have already overthrown the legitimate governments by unlawful means .
After all , most of the laws they write and which are enforced are clearly unconstitutional .
Can this new law be used to put all our congresscritters and such in jail ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...have already overthrown the legitimate governments by unlawful means.
After all, most of the laws they write and which are enforced are clearly unconstitutional.
Can  this new law be used to put all our congresscritters and such in jail?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099482</id>
	<title>Re:Easy way to "democratically" jail and fine diss</title>
	<author>david\_thornley</author>
	<datestamp>1265903340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
To use a software analogy, I'm reading the code (the wording of the law).  You're reading the comments.  Which of us is more likely to know what the program actually does?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To use a software analogy , I 'm reading the code ( the wording of the law ) .
You 're reading the comments .
Which of us is more likely to know what the program actually does ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
To use a software analogy, I'm reading the code (the wording of the law).
You're reading the comments.
Which of us is more likely to know what the program actually does?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094144</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265035020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure they mean by way of a coup.</p><p>Federal employees are required as a condition of their employment to swear under penalty of perjury that we will not overthrow the federal government, but we're still allowed to vote for members of the party that currently isn't in power.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure they mean by way of a coup.Federal employees are required as a condition of their employment to swear under penalty of perjury that we will not overthrow the federal government , but we 're still allowed to vote for members of the party that currently is n't in power .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure they mean by way of a coup.Federal employees are required as a condition of their employment to swear under penalty of perjury that we will not overthrow the federal government, but we're still allowed to vote for members of the party that currently isn't in power.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094014</id>
	<title>Let the witchhunt begin!</title>
	<author>zill</author>
	<datestamp>1265034420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's stopping people from filling out the form on behalf of their most hated organization? It only costs $5 + postage.<br> <br>

Ballmer's signature is just one google image search away thanks to "Windows 7 RTM Ultimate Steve Ballmer Signature Edition".</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's stopping people from filling out the form on behalf of their most hated organization ?
It only costs $ 5 + postage .
Ballmer 's signature is just one google image search away thanks to " Windows 7 RTM Ultimate Steve Ballmer Signature Edition " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's stopping people from filling out the form on behalf of their most hated organization?
It only costs $5 + postage.
Ballmer's signature is just one google image search away thanks to "Windows 7 RTM Ultimate Steve Ballmer Signature Edition".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100502</id>
	<title>What illegalities are included?</title>
	<author>grandpa-geek</author>
	<datestamp>1265907900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does this mean that vote suppression during elections, vote buying, bribes by lobbyists, and other illegal activities by political parties and lobbyists require subversive registration?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean that vote suppression during elections , vote buying , bribes by lobbyists , and other illegal activities by political parties and lobbyists require subversive registration ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean that vote suppression during elections, vote buying, bribes by lobbyists, and other illegal activities by political parties and lobbyists require subversive registration?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31109266</id>
	<title>Wasp by Eric Frank Russell</title>
	<author>Keith Henson</author>
	<datestamp>1265906640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am in awe of the sagacity of the SC legislators.

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wasp\_(novel)#Reception" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wasp\_(novel)#Reception</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am in awe of the sagacity of the SC legislators .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wasp \ _ ( novel ) # Reception [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am in awe of the sagacity of the SC legislators.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wasp\_(novel)#Reception [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095508</id>
	<title>mailed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265044080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WILEY and co-conspirators believe the use of high-explosives to restore the rights of 10th and 14th Ammendments is fully justified. We have planned to base our operations around train tunnels.</p><p><a href="http://www.scsos.com/forms/Miscellaneous/SubversiveAgentForm.pdf" title="scsos.com" rel="nofollow">SubversiveAgentForm.pdf</a> [scsos.com]</p><p>make sure there are no finger prints<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WILEY and co-conspirators believe the use of high-explosives to restore the rights of 10th and 14th Ammendments is fully justified .
We have planned to base our operations around train tunnels.SubversiveAgentForm.pdf [ scsos.com ] make sure there are no finger prints ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WILEY and co-conspirators believe the use of high-explosives to restore the rights of 10th and 14th Ammendments is fully justified.
We have planned to base our operations around train tunnels.SubversiveAgentForm.pdf [scsos.com]make sure there are no finger prints ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098180</id>
	<title>No big deal for overthrowing S. Carolina, though</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265894400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... shall register with the Secretary of State"</p><p>It says "United States".</p><p>Soooooo, it's no problem for people who just want to overthrow the government of South Carolina so that this stupid law can be repealed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" necessity or propriety of controlling , conducting , seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States ... shall register with the Secretary of State " It says " United States " .Soooooo , it 's no problem for people who just want to overthrow the government of South Carolina so that this stupid law can be repealed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States ... shall register with the Secretary of State"It says "United States".Soooooo, it's no problem for people who just want to overthrow the government of South Carolina so that this stupid law can be repealed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093662</id>
	<title>But if they outlaw secretly being a Terrorist</title>
	<author>dmomo</author>
	<datestamp>1265032980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only criminals will secretly be Terrorists.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>PANIC!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only criminals will secretly be Terrorists .
: ( ...PANIC !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only criminals will secretly be Terrorists.
:( ...PANIC!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093742</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265033340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>They're not planning to overthrow the government. They <i>already have</i>. Don't be fooled just because there's a Democrat in the White House. Democrats vs. Republicans is just a puppet show they put on to keep us all distracted and divided. Meanwhile, Obama and Bush have more interests in common with each other than either of them do with The People.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're not planning to overthrow the government .
They already have .
Do n't be fooled just because there 's a Democrat in the White House .
Democrats vs. Republicans is just a puppet show they put on to keep us all distracted and divided .
Meanwhile , Obama and Bush have more interests in common with each other than either of them do with The People .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're not planning to overthrow the government.
They already have.
Don't be fooled just because there's a Democrat in the White House.
Democrats vs. Republicans is just a puppet show they put on to keep us all distracted and divided.
Meanwhile, Obama and Bush have more interests in common with each other than either of them do with The People.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094056</id>
	<title>Re:Republican Party...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265034660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>More specifically, both the Republican and Democrat parties aim to control the government of the USA, which, according to TFS, means that you must register as a member of a subversive group if you are a member of either in South Carolina.  What's to betting that none of the people who voted for this bill have registered?  Round them up, fine them, and throw them in prison for 10 years.</htmltext>
<tokenext>More specifically , both the Republican and Democrat parties aim to control the government of the USA , which , according to TFS , means that you must register as a member of a subversive group if you are a member of either in South Carolina .
What 's to betting that none of the people who voted for this bill have registered ?
Round them up , fine them , and throw them in prison for 10 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More specifically, both the Republican and Democrat parties aim to control the government of the USA, which, according to TFS, means that you must register as a member of a subversive group if you are a member of either in South Carolina.
What's to betting that none of the people who voted for this bill have registered?
Round them up, fine them, and throw them in prison for 10 years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095608</id>
	<title>Re:Murderers, bank robbers, and rapists too.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265044800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Laws like this would have Martin Luther King and all of his followers thrown in jail.</p></div>
</blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Laws like this would have Martin Luther King and all of his followers thrown in jail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Laws like this would have Martin Luther King and all of his followers thrown in jail.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31112970</id>
	<title>Including Republicans and Democrats?</title>
	<author>minstrelmike</author>
	<datestamp>1265990040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does that include all the Fox News Republicans who want to throw out all the Democrats? And vice versa when W was in there?

I am already registered to vote.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does that include all the Fox News Republicans who want to throw out all the Democrats ?
And vice versa when W was in there ?
I am already registered to vote .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does that include all the Fox News Republicans who want to throw out all the Democrats?
And vice versa when W was in there?
I am already registered to vote.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093728</id>
	<title>Re:Can I mail it in or what?</title>
	<author>rabiddeity</author>
	<datestamp>1265033220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why don't you just drive there?</p><p>... ohhhhhh nevermind, I see!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't you just drive there ? .. .
ohhhhhh nevermind , I see !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't you just drive there?...
ohhhhhh nevermind, I see!
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093614</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097114
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31102456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_113</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31109184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_136</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095362
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_129</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31130634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_131</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31109328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_105</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_133</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_128</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31102584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_119</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31110100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_110</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095736
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31131724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31101208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_134</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095636
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31101506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31109390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094372
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31106444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31101338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_127</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100166
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_117</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_122</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099664
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095874
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_109</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_137</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31147638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31110332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31109292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097254
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099960
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096862
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_114</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094144
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095378
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_121</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_104</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094254
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_138</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_120</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_111</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31109446
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_135</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099154
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_112</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_103</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_126</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31105192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31103258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094276
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31101390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_130</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094346
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_132</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098932
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097220
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_118</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095510
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094336
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_125</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_108</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31101404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_124</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_115</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_116</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_107</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31107866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_123</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094480
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094364
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_106</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096604
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2347257_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093636
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093888
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095874
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094912
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094372
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094268
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093812
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096878
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093898
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094354
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094126
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094186
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094054
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093594
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095456
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093652
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095756
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094212
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094938
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094866
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093838
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100322
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31101338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094778
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095764
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098168
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094504
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093772
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094768
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093762
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096560
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093746
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093656
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094076
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094740
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095066
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31110332
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096868
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095682
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31109328
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100816
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099664
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095602
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095604
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31109184
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097164
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095736
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096264
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31106444
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095670
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099546
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098932
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097920
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100840
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097382
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097590
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096086
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096164
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095566
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100428
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096810
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100472
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31109292
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099800
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099226
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098238
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099154
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31101506
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31109390
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095596
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099718
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094818
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098206
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100116
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31109446
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095504
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097196
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098770
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095362
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093730
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094872
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093948
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094842
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093638
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093710
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095378
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095040
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100090
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094422
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094480
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094662
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096186
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095690
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096952
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096122
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094292
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31105192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100082
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094810
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31101406
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097546
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094084
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31107866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094336
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31102584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100172
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094144
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31101404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093742
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094056
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095158
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31147638
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094082
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095244
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31101390
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096862
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31103258
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096668
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097254
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095882
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097220
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096380
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095636
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31110100
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31100166
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31131724
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095510
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097520
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31101208
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097114
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097320
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093944
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31130634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31102456
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097650
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094538
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31096584
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099562
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094346
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095206
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098104
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31098002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31097596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094364
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094312
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2347257.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093960
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31094594
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31093764
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31095208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2347257.31099960
</commentlist>
</conversation>
