<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_10_2125242</id>
	<title>Iran Suspends Google's Email Service</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1265794560000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>appl\_iran writes <i>"Iran's telecommunications agency announced that it would be <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1020360720100210">suspending Google's email</a> services permanently, saying it would roll out its own national email service."</i> From the short WSJ article that is kernel of this Reuters story: "An Iranian official said the measure was meant to boost local development of Internet technology and <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704140104575057621649270154.html?KEYWORDS=iran">to build trust between people and the government</a>." Funny way to go about that. <strong>Updated 20100211 9:54GMT by timothy:</strong> Original link swapped for a more appropriate, updated one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>appl \ _iran writes " Iran 's telecommunications agency announced that it would be suspending Google 's email services permanently , saying it would roll out its own national email service .
" From the short WSJ article that is kernel of this Reuters story : " An Iranian official said the measure was meant to boost local development of Internet technology and to build trust between people and the government .
" Funny way to go about that .
Updated 20100211 9 : 54GMT by timothy : Original link swapped for a more appropriate , updated one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>appl\_iran writes "Iran's telecommunications agency announced that it would be suspending Google's email services permanently, saying it would roll out its own national email service.
" From the short WSJ article that is kernel of this Reuters story: "An Iranian official said the measure was meant to boost local development of Internet technology and to build trust between people and the government.
" Funny way to go about that.
Updated 20100211 9:54GMT by timothy: Original link swapped for a more appropriate, updated one.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091710</id>
	<title>Force dependence, remind of control</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1265022720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're not idiots. This is no different to poking someone's eyes out so they're forced to rely on you to be their eyes, and so they can't go anywhere or do anything without you. They're also sending a message that they are in power and can do whatever they like.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're not idiots .
This is no different to poking someone 's eyes out so they 're forced to rely on you to be their eyes , and so they ca n't go anywhere or do anything without you .
They 're also sending a message that they are in power and can do whatever they like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're not idiots.
This is no different to poking someone's eyes out so they're forced to rely on you to be their eyes, and so they can't go anywhere or do anything without you.
They're also sending a message that they are in power and can do whatever they like.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096934</id>
	<title>Re:Now with 100\% more Goatse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265921880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone put "script window.location = "http://www\_ha\_on\_nimp\_org<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/script" as one of the comments there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone put " script window.location = " http : //www \ _ha \ _on \ _nimp \ _org /script " as one of the comments there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone put "script window.location = "http://www\_ha\_on\_nimp\_org /script" as one of the comments there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095740</id>
	<title>Re:China lead the way.</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1265045820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Next up: US and EU.</p><p>Wanna make a bet? I give it between 5 and 10 years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Next up : US and EU.Wan na make a bet ?
I give it between 5 and 10 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next up: US and EU.Wanna make a bet?
I give it between 5 and 10 years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31097106</id>
	<title>VIRUS !!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265880360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Link has a virus on it, ESet AV picked it up as : Exploit.DialogArg.A trojan not sure where to post this!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Link has a virus on it , ESet AV picked it up as : Exploit.DialogArg.A trojan not sure where to post this !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Link has a virus on it, ESet AV picked it up as : Exploit.DialogArg.A trojan not sure where to post this!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091646</id>
	<title>Google vs. the goverment</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265022480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google vs. the goverment.  What's the difference?  Precious little.  Trusting your privacy to Google is like mailing your private files to the FBI.

American or Iranian, it's all goverment.  Wake up and guard your privacy.  What little you have left.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google vs. the goverment .
What 's the difference ?
Precious little .
Trusting your privacy to Google is like mailing your private files to the FBI .
American or Iranian , it 's all goverment .
Wake up and guard your privacy .
What little you have left .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google vs. the goverment.
What's the difference?
Precious little.
Trusting your privacy to Google is like mailing your private files to the FBI.
American or Iranian, it's all goverment.
Wake up and guard your privacy.
What little you have left.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091340</id>
	<title>Don't you mean suspends access to?</title>
	<author>nicknamenotavailable</author>
	<datestamp>1265021220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Iran Suspends Google's Email Service</p></div><p>In Iran I presume</p><p>I thought that Iran was on the US trade embargo list.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Iran Suspends Google 's Email ServiceIn Iran I presumeI thought that Iran was on the US trade embargo list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Iran Suspends Google's Email ServiceIn Iran I presumeI thought that Iran was on the US trade embargo list.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091412</id>
	<title>How to help Iran and stop their dictator</title>
	<author>handfullofsausage</author>
	<datestamp>1265021580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>We need to spray Iran with bacon grease. Take a fleet of c130's load em up with tankers filled with bacon grease and spray the entire area liberally. A couple of days should do it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We need to spray Iran with bacon grease .
Take a fleet of c130 's load em up with tankers filled with bacon grease and spray the entire area liberally .
A couple of days should do it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We need to spray Iran with bacon grease.
Take a fleet of c130's load em up with tankers filled with bacon grease and spray the entire area liberally.
A couple of days should do it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091758</id>
	<title>Re:China lead the way.</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1265022900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They probably think of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust\_(law)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">this</a> [wikipedia.org] type of trust, where the managed property is your opinion, and the government manages it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They probably think of this [ wikipedia.org ] type of trust , where the managed property is your opinion , and the government manages it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They probably think of this [wikipedia.org] type of trust, where the managed property is your opinion, and the government manages it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140</id>
	<title>China lead the way.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265020680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"to build trust between people and government"</p><p>Because, as China has shown, censoring communication is the fastest and easiest way to built trust. Go Iran!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" to build trust between people and government " Because , as China has shown , censoring communication is the fastest and easiest way to built trust .
Go Iran !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"to build trust between people and government"Because, as China has shown, censoring communication is the fastest and easiest way to built trust.
Go Iran!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092436</id>
	<title>HA HA!!!!</title>
	<author>EEPROMS</author>
	<datestamp>1265026260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"An Iranian official said the measure was meant to boost local development of Internet technology and to build trust between people and the government"</i> <br> <br> Just goes to show, even Iranian officials have a sense of humour...</htmltext>
<tokenext>" An Iranian official said the measure was meant to boost local development of Internet technology and to build trust between people and the government " Just goes to show , even Iranian officials have a sense of humour.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"An Iranian official said the measure was meant to boost local development of Internet technology and to build trust between people and the government"   Just goes to show, even Iranian officials have a sense of humour...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091480</id>
	<title>Re:China lead the way.</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1265021880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well duh, being able to read your emails removes the strain for the government to trust you, while also training you to entrust your government with your secrets. Hence, trust-building.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well duh , being able to read your emails removes the strain for the government to trust you , while also training you to entrust your government with your secrets .
Hence , trust-building .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well duh, being able to read your emails removes the strain for the government to trust you, while also training you to entrust your government with your secrets.
Hence, trust-building.
:P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092380</id>
	<title>And in other news...</title>
	<author>cvtan</author>
	<datestamp>1265025840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Iran has banned the wheel permanently.   "An Iranian official said the measure was meant to boost local development of technology and to build trust between people and the government, according to the Wall Street Journal."  Anyone owning an automobile is required to turn in any round things on their cars (road wheels, steering wheels, hubcap spinners with pictures of Mohammed, etc.) or face severe punishment.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Iran has banned the wheel permanently .
" An Iranian official said the measure was meant to boost local development of technology and to build trust between people and the government , according to the Wall Street Journal .
" Anyone owning an automobile is required to turn in any round things on their cars ( road wheels , steering wheels , hubcap spinners with pictures of Mohammed , etc .
) or face severe punishment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Iran has banned the wheel permanently.
"An Iranian official said the measure was meant to boost local development of technology and to build trust between people and the government, according to the Wall Street Journal.
"  Anyone owning an automobile is required to turn in any round things on their cars (road wheels, steering wheels, hubcap spinners with pictures of Mohammed, etc.
) or face severe punishment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091354</id>
	<title>Building Trust through Surveillance</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265021340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know that my own trust in the US government is hugely enhanced by NSA's monitoring of my communications.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know that my own trust in the US government is hugely enhanced by NSA 's monitoring of my communications .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know that my own trust in the US government is hugely enhanced by NSA's monitoring of my communications.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091706</id>
	<title>Googlemail is soon to be social media</title>
	<author>LullySing</author>
	<datestamp>1265022720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My best bet to the "closure" of gmail now is because Google are working on social media aspects to add to gmail.</p><p>You have to remember that social media sites like facebook have been causing a lot of problems for the iran govt. since the last "failed uprising" was all organised in a quick, chaotic way using social media.  So by taking this decision now instead of later, they can cover up the closing of gmail into a "national project" before gmail becomes a problem like facebook,email and social media sites in general.</p><p>To these guys, it's all about control. Control of the population thru control of the media.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My best bet to the " closure " of gmail now is because Google are working on social media aspects to add to gmail.You have to remember that social media sites like facebook have been causing a lot of problems for the iran govt .
since the last " failed uprising " was all organised in a quick , chaotic way using social media .
So by taking this decision now instead of later , they can cover up the closing of gmail into a " national project " before gmail becomes a problem like facebook,email and social media sites in general.To these guys , it 's all about control .
Control of the population thru control of the media .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My best bet to the "closure" of gmail now is because Google are working on social media aspects to add to gmail.You have to remember that social media sites like facebook have been causing a lot of problems for the iran govt.
since the last "failed uprising" was all organised in a quick, chaotic way using social media.
So by taking this decision now instead of later, they can cover up the closing of gmail into a "national project" before gmail becomes a problem like facebook,email and social media sites in general.To these guys, it's all about control.
Control of the population thru control of the media.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091524</id>
	<title>Allah gave us free will...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265022060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Allah  gave us free will<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... but Allah's most fervent supports spend their entire lives trying to take it away...<br>If I was most powerful and most merciful i'd set the record strait on this one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Allah gave us free will ... but Allah 's most fervent supports spend their entire lives trying to take it away...If I was most powerful and most merciful i 'd set the record strait on this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Allah  gave us free will ... but Allah's most fervent supports spend their entire lives trying to take it away...If I was most powerful and most merciful i'd set the record strait on this one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091392</id>
	<title>Re:China lead the way.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265021520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Because, as China has shown, censoring communication is the fastest and easiest way to built trust. Go Iran!</p></div><p>I'm not sure if you are being sarcastic or you believe this.  Just for the record, Americans are much less "trusting" of their government than Chinese people.  There is this idea that since we (Americans) see what is going on from the outside that they must see the same and have the same opinion.  This is just not the case.  Here is an example of the differences.</p><p>http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2008/Most-Chinese-Say-They-Approve-of-Government-Internet-Control.aspx<br>Note: you will need to view the research in PDF format.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because , as China has shown , censoring communication is the fastest and easiest way to built trust .
Go Iran ! I 'm not sure if you are being sarcastic or you believe this .
Just for the record , Americans are much less " trusting " of their government than Chinese people .
There is this idea that since we ( Americans ) see what is going on from the outside that they must see the same and have the same opinion .
This is just not the case .
Here is an example of the differences.http : //www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2008/Most-Chinese-Say-They-Approve-of-Government-Internet-Control.aspxNote : you will need to view the research in PDF format .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because, as China has shown, censoring communication is the fastest and easiest way to built trust.
Go Iran!I'm not sure if you are being sarcastic or you believe this.
Just for the record, Americans are much less "trusting" of their government than Chinese people.
There is this idea that since we (Americans) see what is going on from the outside that they must see the same and have the same opinion.
This is just not the case.
Here is an example of the differences.http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2008/Most-Chinese-Say-They-Approve-of-Government-Internet-Control.aspxNote: you will need to view the research in PDF format.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091358</id>
	<title>Build trust? I guess that makes sense.</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1265021340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once the government is managing all your communications, they'll finally be able to trust you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once the government is managing all your communications , they 'll finally be able to trust you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once the government is managing all your communications, they'll finally be able to trust you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096942</id>
	<title>DO NOT OPEN TFA: VIRUS INSTALLATION ATTEMPT</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265921940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, same here. Very annoying indeed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , same here .
Very annoying indeed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, same here.
Very annoying indeed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092066</id>
	<title>In Soviet Iran</title>
	<author>geekmansworld</author>
	<datestamp>1265024100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Email reads you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Email reads you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Email reads you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096900</id>
	<title>That url infected my Mac OSX 10.6.2 Dont Open it!</title>
	<author>brfsa</author>
	<datestamp>1265921580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>That url infected my Mac OSX 10.6.2 Dont Open it!

The site URL from this article is infected. It made my mac OSX 10.6.2 go crazy, dial skype numbers, opened like 100 gay and porn sites. it created hundreds of emails and tried to send. also messed up with my Xchat and Adium contacts.

Luckily i disconnected WIFI right in time.

OMG!! what just happen is unbelievable!

Dont open that link! it is very dangerous</htmltext>
<tokenext>That url infected my Mac OSX 10.6.2 Dont Open it !
The site URL from this article is infected .
It made my mac OSX 10.6.2 go crazy , dial skype numbers , opened like 100 gay and porn sites .
it created hundreds of emails and tried to send .
also messed up with my Xchat and Adium contacts .
Luckily i disconnected WIFI right in time .
OMG ! ! what just happen is unbelievable !
Dont open that link !
it is very dangerous</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That url infected my Mac OSX 10.6.2 Dont Open it!
The site URL from this article is infected.
It made my mac OSX 10.6.2 go crazy, dial skype numbers, opened like 100 gay and porn sites.
it created hundreds of emails and tried to send.
also messed up with my Xchat and Adium contacts.
Luckily i disconnected WIFI right in time.
OMG!! what just happen is unbelievable!
Dont open that link!
it is very dangerous</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096886</id>
	<title>Redirected</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265921460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone else getting redirected to loldongs.eu with the stupid script. Wtf.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone else getting redirected to loldongs.eu with the stupid script .
Wtf .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone else getting redirected to loldongs.eu with the stupid script.
Wtf.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31097390</id>
	<title>Re:Now with 100\% more Goatse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265884680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Same here</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Same here</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same here</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091186</id>
	<title>More jobs in iran</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265020800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Consequently, there are now several hundred job openings for "Proof Reading"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Consequently , there are now several hundred job openings for " Proof Reading "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Consequently, there are now several hundred job openings for "Proof Reading"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095752</id>
	<title>Re:Clipper Chip deja vu?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265046000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Anyone remember the US government initiative in the 90's to be able to snoop on its citizens phone calls?</i></p><p>The Clipper Chip failed because it was subjected to citizen protest.  However, around the same time <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications\_Assistance\_for\_Law\_Enforcement\_Act" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">CALEA</a> [wikipedia.org] was passed, which is very very similar in effect.</p><p>Aside from abuses afforded by CALEA, the US government's spy networks have <a href="http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/04/70619" title="wired.com" rel="nofollow">repeatedly</a> [wired.com] <a href="http://government.zdnet.com/?p=4097" title="zdnet.com" rel="nofollow">snooped on its citizens'</a> [zdnet.com] phone calls.  There was no victory with the Clipper Chip.  It was just a minor setback.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone remember the US government initiative in the 90 's to be able to snoop on its citizens phone calls ? The Clipper Chip failed because it was subjected to citizen protest .
However , around the same time CALEA [ wikipedia.org ] was passed , which is very very similar in effect.Aside from abuses afforded by CALEA , the US government 's spy networks have repeatedly [ wired.com ] snooped on its citizens ' [ zdnet.com ] phone calls .
There was no victory with the Clipper Chip .
It was just a minor setback .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone remember the US government initiative in the 90's to be able to snoop on its citizens phone calls?The Clipper Chip failed because it was subjected to citizen protest.
However, around the same time CALEA [wikipedia.org] was passed, which is very very similar in effect.Aside from abuses afforded by CALEA, the US government's spy networks have repeatedly [wired.com] snooped on its citizens' [zdnet.com] phone calls.
There was no victory with the Clipper Chip.
It was just a minor setback.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31099090</id>
	<title>Re:Iran threatens with a "punch" for Feb. 11th</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265901180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd rather not leave it to chance. Let's take 'em out.</p><p>"Ladies and gentleman, the Islamic Republic of Iran has been declared an outlaw nation. The bombing starts in five minutes."<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd rather not leave it to chance .
Let 's take 'em out .
" Ladies and gentleman , the Islamic Republic of Iran has been declared an outlaw nation .
The bombing starts in five minutes .
" : -D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd rather not leave it to chance.
Let's take 'em out.
"Ladies and gentleman, the Islamic Republic of Iran has been declared an outlaw nation.
The bombing starts in five minutes.
" :-D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096400</id>
	<title>no to get permission</title>
	<author>vtstarin</author>
	<datestamp>1265051880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>it is good for them..so they dont need to get permission from other to see your inbox...</htmltext>
<tokenext>it is good for them..so they dont need to get permission from other to see your inbox.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it is good for them..so they dont need to get permission from other to see your inbox...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091218</id>
	<title>Re:China lead the way.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265020860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Ministry Of Truth has a much more sensitive way to tell this.</p><p>"More trust between people and government", and trust begins with knowing who is who and where he lives, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Ministry Of Truth has a much more sensitive way to tell this .
" More trust between people and government " , and trust begins with knowing who is who and where he lives , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Ministry Of Truth has a much more sensitive way to tell this.
"More trust between people and government", and trust begins with knowing who is who and where he lives, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091948</id>
	<title>hellya..</title>
	<author>designperfection9</author>
	<datestamp>1265023680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>are they gonna name the email service.. Husseinmail.com???</htmltext>
<tokenext>are they gon na name the email service. .
Husseinmail.com ? ? ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>are they gonna name the email service..
Husseinmail.com???</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095860</id>
	<title>Hosted email service?</title>
	<author>fak3r</author>
	<datestamp>1265046840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"saying it would roll out its own national email service."<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...I recommend they use Google Apps, takes all of the burden out of hosting your own email.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" saying it would roll out its own national email service .
" ...I recommend they use Google Apps , takes all of the burden out of hosting your own email .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"saying it would roll out its own national email service.
" ...I recommend they use Google Apps, takes all of the burden out of hosting your own email.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092556</id>
	<title>Re:I think it's a good idea</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1265027100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ignoring for a moment that this will give the Iranian government a high level of control over standard email communications, (ignoring, IGNORING), I think this is actually a very good idea.</p><p>Think of it as a technological tariff on free internet services, with the intent to create jobs and a demand for technologically adept people. It's almost benevolent (if it wasn't for the unfettered access to other's communications part).</p></div><p>Welcome to Slashdot, President Ahmadinejad!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ignoring for a moment that this will give the Iranian government a high level of control over standard email communications , ( ignoring , IGNORING ) , I think this is actually a very good idea.Think of it as a technological tariff on free internet services , with the intent to create jobs and a demand for technologically adept people .
It 's almost benevolent ( if it was n't for the unfettered access to other 's communications part ) .Welcome to Slashdot , President Ahmadinejad !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ignoring for a moment that this will give the Iranian government a high level of control over standard email communications, (ignoring, IGNORING), I think this is actually a very good idea.Think of it as a technological tariff on free internet services, with the intent to create jobs and a demand for technologically adept people.
It's almost benevolent (if it wasn't for the unfettered access to other's communications part).Welcome to Slashdot, President Ahmadinejad!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096198</id>
	<title>trojan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265049840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A  trojan  was  detected by  Nod32 on  the hyperlink: http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20100210/iran-suspends-googles-email-service.htm</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A trojan was detected by Nod32 on the hyperlink : http : //www.ibtimes.com/articles/20100210/iran-suspends-googles-email-service.htm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A  trojan  was  detected by  Nod32 on  the hyperlink: http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20100210/iran-suspends-googles-email-service.htm</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096974</id>
	<title>gmail still online</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265878980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My gmail account is still working. When does it say the service will be suspended?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My gmail account is still working .
When does it say the service will be suspended ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My gmail account is still working.
When does it say the service will be suspended?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091432</id>
	<title>Re:Iran threatens with a "punch" for Feb. 11th</title>
	<author>malakai</author>
	<datestamp>1265021640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The people of Iran better hope this "punch" is not in anyway directed at Israel.</p><p>Israel is the sober angry Krav Maga expert being held back by his friends at the end of the bar which houses a drunk Iran and his orange tanned Persian 'guido' friends.</p><p>I think we're about to have A Situation Here....on the Persian Shore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The people of Iran better hope this " punch " is not in anyway directed at Israel.Israel is the sober angry Krav Maga expert being held back by his friends at the end of the bar which houses a drunk Iran and his orange tanned Persian 'guido ' friends.I think we 're about to have A Situation Here....on the Persian Shore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The people of Iran better hope this "punch" is not in anyway directed at Israel.Israel is the sober angry Krav Maga expert being held back by his friends at the end of the bar which houses a drunk Iran and his orange tanned Persian 'guido' friends.I think we're about to have A Situation Here....on the Persian Shore.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092168</id>
	<title>USPS</title>
	<author>homer\_s</author>
	<datestamp>1265024580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Like the justification for govt. running postal service in the USA, maybe the Iranians feel that the only way to provide equal access to this vital service is for the govt. to run the email service. <br> <br>

Makes as much sense as the argument for the USPS monopoly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Like the justification for govt .
running postal service in the USA , maybe the Iranians feel that the only way to provide equal access to this vital service is for the govt .
to run the email service .
Makes as much sense as the argument for the USPS monopoly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like the justification for govt.
running postal service in the USA, maybe the Iranians feel that the only way to provide equal access to this vital service is for the govt.
to run the email service.
Makes as much sense as the argument for the USPS monopoly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096398</id>
	<title>the ibtimes website is hacked now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265051820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seems the ibtimes website is hacked now<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... going there leads to an obnoxious website in turn tries to fork bomb the visitor's computer by opening lots of internet connections in other programs and creating a lot of emails without end.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems the ibtimes website is hacked now ... going there leads to an obnoxious website in turn tries to fork bomb the visitor 's computer by opening lots of internet connections in other programs and creating a lot of emails without end .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems the ibtimes website is hacked now ... going there leads to an obnoxious website in turn tries to fork bomb the visitor's computer by opening lots of internet connections in other programs and creating a lot of emails without end.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091718</id>
	<title>How many of you use an Iranian email service?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265022780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the issue is with trusting a service that is open to the subpoena laws and intelligence agencies of another country, period.</p><p>Google will supply your full email history if order3ed by a court. And, under the "patriot" act, most likely even if not.</p><p>Would you trust an email service provided by a country with a government you don't trust? China? North Korea? Iran?</p><p>Of course, having the government take that decision away from you is another matter... but still logical.</p><p>Iran is almost at war with the U.S. Nothing surprising here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the issue is with trusting a service that is open to the subpoena laws and intelligence agencies of another country , period.Google will supply your full email history if order3ed by a court .
And , under the " patriot " act , most likely even if not.Would you trust an email service provided by a country with a government you do n't trust ?
China ? North Korea ?
Iran ? Of course , having the government take that decision away from you is another matter... but still logical.Iran is almost at war with the U.S. Nothing surprising here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the issue is with trusting a service that is open to the subpoena laws and intelligence agencies of another country, period.Google will supply your full email history if order3ed by a court.
And, under the "patriot" act, most likely even if not.Would you trust an email service provided by a country with a government you don't trust?
China? North Korea?
Iran?Of course, having the government take that decision away from you is another matter... but still logical.Iran is almost at war with the U.S. Nothing surprising here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091558</id>
	<title>One down, 746 more to filter.</title>
	<author>geekmux</author>
	<datestamp>1265022180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course, I'm certain there are no other webmail-based services available now or ever in the future for Iranians to use...right?  Right?</p><p>Seriously, unless they plan on creating yet another seive like the "Great" firewall of China, how the hell do they expect to "control" an entity like Internet-based email services?</p><p>Wow, if you were ever caught using hushmail over there...I can only imagine the punishment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , I 'm certain there are no other webmail-based services available now or ever in the future for Iranians to use...right ?
Right ? Seriously , unless they plan on creating yet another seive like the " Great " firewall of China , how the hell do they expect to " control " an entity like Internet-based email services ? Wow , if you were ever caught using hushmail over there...I can only imagine the punishment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, I'm certain there are no other webmail-based services available now or ever in the future for Iranians to use...right?
Right?Seriously, unless they plan on creating yet another seive like the "Great" firewall of China, how the hell do they expect to "control" an entity like Internet-based email services?Wow, if you were ever caught using hushmail over there...I can only imagine the punishment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091332</id>
	<title>I've seen the Beta!</title>
	<author>e2d2</author>
	<datestamp>1265021160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've seen the Beta. It's actually quite like Google wave where you can edit another's words in real time. And by you I mean government agents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've seen the Beta .
It 's actually quite like Google wave where you can edit another 's words in real time .
And by you I mean government agents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've seen the Beta.
It's actually quite like Google wave where you can edit another's words in real time.
And by you I mean government agents.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096446</id>
	<title>Don't click that link!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265052360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..at least not with Javascript enabled.  The comments on the ibtimes.com site aren't escaping HTML properly, and someone has inserted a script with some very nasty javascript.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..at least not with Javascript enabled .
The comments on the ibtimes.com site are n't escaping HTML properly , and someone has inserted a script with some very nasty javascript .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..at least not with Javascript enabled.
The comments on the ibtimes.com site aren't escaping HTML properly, and someone has inserted a script with some very nasty javascript.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31097476</id>
	<title>Gay porn linked ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265885880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go slashdot; the target site is apparently -totally- clueless, and allow un-escaped javascript in their comments, meaning this page re-directs to www.hax.on.nimp.org, and has some -horrible- shudder filth thrown into the browser.</p><p>That substantially damages my estimation of slashdot as a safe and interesting place to browse, wow it was sickening.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go slashdot ; the target site is apparently -totally- clueless , and allow un-escaped javascript in their comments , meaning this page re-directs to www.hax.on.nimp.org , and has some -horrible- shudder filth thrown into the browser.That substantially damages my estimation of slashdot as a safe and interesting place to browse , wow it was sickening .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go slashdot; the target site is apparently -totally- clueless, and allow un-escaped javascript in their comments, meaning this page re-directs to www.hax.on.nimp.org, and has some -horrible- shudder filth thrown into the browser.That substantially damages my estimation of slashdot as a safe and interesting place to browse, wow it was sickening.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31109242</id>
	<title>Re:Now with 100\% more Goatse</title>
	<author>Lunzo</author>
	<datestamp>1265906400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good thing I don't read the article!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good thing I do n't read the article !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good thing I don't read the article!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091788</id>
	<title>Neither -- it's countering  demonstrations</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1265023020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is neither an empty threat, nor foreshadowing of an attack on Israel (or any other country).</p><p>The "punch" is going to be Revolutionary Guard, Basij Islamic militia, and regular police taking to the streets to violently oppress the peaceful opposition protesters who will also be taking to the streets on the anniversary of the Islamic Revolution, which is Feb. 11.  They will thus stun the opposition, and indirectly "the West" who the Iranian government claims is responsible for organizing the protesters.</p><p>The BBC article gets it right.  The WorldNetDaily article and your post are piles of FUD-mongering dung.</p><p>What, is crushing a peaceful pro-democracy movement by killing its own citizens in the name of peace not bad enough for you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is neither an empty threat , nor foreshadowing of an attack on Israel ( or any other country ) .The " punch " is going to be Revolutionary Guard , Basij Islamic militia , and regular police taking to the streets to violently oppress the peaceful opposition protesters who will also be taking to the streets on the anniversary of the Islamic Revolution , which is Feb. 11. They will thus stun the opposition , and indirectly " the West " who the Iranian government claims is responsible for organizing the protesters.The BBC article gets it right .
The WorldNetDaily article and your post are piles of FUD-mongering dung.What , is crushing a peaceful pro-democracy movement by killing its own citizens in the name of peace not bad enough for you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is neither an empty threat, nor foreshadowing of an attack on Israel (or any other country).The "punch" is going to be Revolutionary Guard, Basij Islamic militia, and regular police taking to the streets to violently oppress the peaceful opposition protesters who will also be taking to the streets on the anniversary of the Islamic Revolution, which is Feb. 11.  They will thus stun the opposition, and indirectly "the West" who the Iranian government claims is responsible for organizing the protesters.The BBC article gets it right.
The WorldNetDaily article and your post are piles of FUD-mongering dung.What, is crushing a peaceful pro-democracy movement by killing its own citizens in the name of peace not bad enough for you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091862</id>
	<title>Bad move, Iran.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265023260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Guess who the people get to blame when the email's down.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guess who the people get to blame when the email 's down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guess who the people get to blame when the email's down.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092706</id>
	<title>Clipper Chip deja vu?</title>
	<author>jayveekay</author>
	<datestamp>1265028180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone remember the US government initiative in the 90's to be able to snoop on its citizens phone calls?</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper\_chip" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper\_chip</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>Governments generally don't seem to like it when their citizens can hide stuff from them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone remember the US government initiative in the 90 's to be able to snoop on its citizens phone calls ? http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper \ _chip [ wikipedia.org ] Governments generally do n't seem to like it when their citizens can hide stuff from them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone remember the US government initiative in the 90's to be able to snoop on its citizens phone calls?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper\_chip [wikipedia.org]Governments generally don't seem to like it when their citizens can hide stuff from them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092406</id>
	<title>trust</title>
	<author>jirka</author>
	<datestamp>1265026080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course it builds trust. When the government runs the only email service out there, you simply have to build trust in the government.  You have no other option.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course it builds trust .
When the government runs the only email service out there , you simply have to build trust in the government .
You have no other option .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course it builds trust.
When the government runs the only email service out there, you simply have to build trust in the government.
You have no other option.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092078</id>
	<title>I just had an insight!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265024160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey guys, I think there may be ulterior motives!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey guys , I think there may be ulterior motives !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey guys, I think there may be ulterior motives!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091450</id>
	<title>What arse faces</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1265021700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;From the short article linked: "An Iranian official said the measure was meant<br>&gt;to boost local development of Internet technology and to build trust between<br>&gt;people and the government, according to the Wall Street Journal."<br>I have to say, I know some Iranians that live over there, and it is all about controlling the media and the information.<br>If they leave gmail to do this, they lose control of the info, and they do not want to lose control.<br>So let's tell people you are no longer allowed to use gmail for we are far too controlling, instead use our homemade brew of gmail, and we will be able to read all your emails and that of your friends...</p><p>Seriously, I would hate to live over there for this simple reason, let alone all the war and crime presently over there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; From the short article linked : " An Iranian official said the measure was meant &gt; to boost local development of Internet technology and to build trust between &gt; people and the government , according to the Wall Street Journal .
" I have to say , I know some Iranians that live over there , and it is all about controlling the media and the information.If they leave gmail to do this , they lose control of the info , and they do not want to lose control.So let 's tell people you are no longer allowed to use gmail for we are far too controlling , instead use our homemade brew of gmail , and we will be able to read all your emails and that of your friends...Seriously , I would hate to live over there for this simple reason , let alone all the war and crime presently over there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;From the short article linked: "An Iranian official said the measure was meant&gt;to boost local development of Internet technology and to build trust between&gt;people and the government, according to the Wall Street Journal.
"I have to say, I know some Iranians that live over there, and it is all about controlling the media and the information.If they leave gmail to do this, they lose control of the info, and they do not want to lose control.So let's tell people you are no longer allowed to use gmail for we are far too controlling, instead use our homemade brew of gmail, and we will be able to read all your emails and that of your friends...Seriously, I would hate to live over there for this simple reason, let alone all the war and crime presently over there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096534</id>
	<title>This just in...</title>
	<author>ZarathustraDK</author>
	<datestamp>1265053500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They'll call it iMail.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll call it iMail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll call it iMail.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091124</id>
	<title>frist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265020620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>w00t!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>w00t !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>w00t!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091464</id>
	<title>UAE</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1265021760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it within the UAE's interests to try and support new leadership in Iran to try and control a future Irani government and keep it an Arab-controlled Islamic state, or should they wait for the US/UN to eventually send in troops over the nuke issue? Who do they want to organize the formation of the next Irani government?</p><p>At this point, isn't an inevitability?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it within the UAE 's interests to try and support new leadership in Iran to try and control a future Irani government and keep it an Arab-controlled Islamic state , or should they wait for the US/UN to eventually send in troops over the nuke issue ?
Who do they want to organize the formation of the next Irani government ? At this point , is n't an inevitability ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it within the UAE's interests to try and support new leadership in Iran to try and control a future Irani government and keep it an Arab-controlled Islamic state, or should they wait for the US/UN to eventually send in troops over the nuke issue?
Who do they want to organize the formation of the next Irani government?At this point, isn't an inevitability?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096412</id>
	<title>Link in article is to terrible porn...do not click</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265052060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do not click on this link! It is hooooorrrible<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...seriously! Slashdot needs to pull this article since it is linking to horrible porno now</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do not click on this link !
It is hooooorrrible ...seriously !
Slashdot needs to pull this article since it is linking to horrible porno now</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do not click on this link!
It is hooooorrrible ...seriously!
Slashdot needs to pull this article since it is linking to horrible porno now</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31097084</id>
	<title>There's a malware in your link !</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265880060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hello !</p><p>Your link is rotten:</p><p>there's a malware in it !<br>a marvelous "VBS:Malware-gen"</p><p>in it:<br>http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20100210/iran-suspends-googles-email-service.htm</p><p>amazing, is this a cyberwar ?</p><p>kraftonZ of numerama.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hello ! Your link is rotten : there 's a malware in it ! a marvelous " VBS : Malware-gen " in it : http : //www.ibtimes.com/articles/20100210/iran-suspends-googles-email-service.htmamazing , is this a cyberwar ? kraftonZ of numerama.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hello !Your link is rotten:there's a malware in it !a marvelous "VBS:Malware-gen"in it:http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20100210/iran-suspends-googles-email-service.htmamazing, is this a cyberwar ?kraftonZ of numerama.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096458</id>
	<title>Link has been compromised?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265052420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just clicked the link, and the browser got hijacked.. hundreds of windows opening at once, playing some audio file..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just clicked the link , and the browser got hijacked.. hundreds of windows opening at once , playing some audio file. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just clicked the link, and the browser got hijacked.. hundreds of windows opening at once, playing some audio file..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091824</id>
	<title>Re:Iran threatens with a "punch" for Feb. 11th</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265023140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tomorrow (Feb. 11) is the anniversary of the Iranian Revolution.  It's like July 4 is in the States.  The government has been preparing to thwart large Green Movement protests on that day.</p><p>I'm amused that few of the highly-moderated comments point out this fact.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tomorrow ( Feb. 11 ) is the anniversary of the Iranian Revolution .
It 's like July 4 is in the States .
The government has been preparing to thwart large Green Movement protests on that day.I 'm amused that few of the highly-moderated comments point out this fact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tomorrow (Feb. 11) is the anniversary of the Iranian Revolution.
It's like July 4 is in the States.
The government has been preparing to thwart large Green Movement protests on that day.I'm amused that few of the highly-moderated comments point out this fact.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095394</id>
	<title>Re:Iran threatens with a "punch" for Feb. 11th</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1265043240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Empty threat or glass parking lot in Tel Aviv? What are they up to?</p></div></blockquote><p>

Of much enjoyment for you low cost service translation. Such is this, the cause is found.<br> <br>

for not converting into haiku, appologise profussely we, time is limited.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Empty threat or glass parking lot in Tel Aviv ?
What are they up to ?
Of much enjoyment for you low cost service translation .
Such is this , the cause is found .
for not converting into haiku , appologise profussely we , time is limited .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Empty threat or glass parking lot in Tel Aviv?
What are they up to?
Of much enjoyment for you low cost service translation.
Such is this, the cause is found.
for not converting into haiku, appologise profussely we, time is limited.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095190</id>
	<title>I guess we'll know soon enough</title>
	<author>symbolset</author>
	<datestamp>1265041740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's already morning in Tehran.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's already morning in Tehran .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's already morning in Tehran.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091454</id>
	<title>Trust?</title>
	<author>jcl945</author>
	<datestamp>1265021700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How can removing any choice and taking full control over a system create trust.  I'm not a huge fan of all the information that Google has, but I trust them a hell of a lot more than I would the Iranian government.  Control  trust.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How can removing any choice and taking full control over a system create trust .
I 'm not a huge fan of all the information that Google has , but I trust them a hell of a lot more than I would the Iranian government .
Control trust .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can removing any choice and taking full control over a system create trust.
I'm not a huge fan of all the information that Google has, but I trust them a hell of a lot more than I would the Iranian government.
Control  trust.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091150</id>
	<title>frist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265020680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>frist</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>frist</tokentext>
<sentencetext>frist</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091430</id>
	<title>Re:Iran threatens with a "punch" for Feb. 11th</title>
	<author>dintech</author>
	<datestamp>1265021640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course an empty threat. You would think they would have learned from what happened to their neighbouring country that even empty threats lead to severe trouble.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course an empty threat .
You would think they would have learned from what happened to their neighbouring country that even empty threats lead to severe trouble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course an empty threat.
You would think they would have learned from what happened to their neighbouring country that even empty threats lead to severe trouble.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31101718</id>
	<title>Re:How many of you use an Iranian email service?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265914500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The point is that we're free to use a Iranian or Chinese web service if we want to, while Iranians and Chinese cannot use a lot of services even if they want to (Facebook, Twitter, now GMail in Iran). Freedom includes being able to make choices that are unwise in the circumstances, and education about choices is better than keeping a populace in ignorance about significant parts of the internet.</p><p>If you think Iran is being concerned with protecting it's citizens from foreign intelligence snooping, rather than trying to control them, please explain why they banned a completely open forum like Twitter (starting during an uprising, no less).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The point is that we 're free to use a Iranian or Chinese web service if we want to , while Iranians and Chinese can not use a lot of services even if they want to ( Facebook , Twitter , now GMail in Iran ) .
Freedom includes being able to make choices that are unwise in the circumstances , and education about choices is better than keeping a populace in ignorance about significant parts of the internet.If you think Iran is being concerned with protecting it 's citizens from foreign intelligence snooping , rather than trying to control them , please explain why they banned a completely open forum like Twitter ( starting during an uprising , no less ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The point is that we're free to use a Iranian or Chinese web service if we want to, while Iranians and Chinese cannot use a lot of services even if they want to (Facebook, Twitter, now GMail in Iran).
Freedom includes being able to make choices that are unwise in the circumstances, and education about choices is better than keeping a populace in ignorance about significant parts of the internet.If you think Iran is being concerned with protecting it's citizens from foreign intelligence snooping, rather than trying to control them, please explain why they banned a completely open forum like Twitter (starting during an uprising, no less).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091692</id>
	<title>What will they call it?</title>
	<author>tool462</author>
	<datestamp>1265022660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will they call it iMail?<br>Will Apple's brand image be tarnished as a result?<br>Will Apple try to sue Iran over trademark infringement?<br>Or will they begrudgingly accept the inevitable Jobs/Ahmadinejad comparisons as having a tiny hint of truth?</p><p>I kid, I kid.  I know you how you guys love to quash dissent<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will they call it iMail ? Will Apple 's brand image be tarnished as a result ? Will Apple try to sue Iran over trademark infringement ? Or will they begrudgingly accept the inevitable Jobs/Ahmadinejad comparisons as having a tiny hint of truth ? I kid , I kid .
I know you how you guys love to quash dissent ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will they call it iMail?Will Apple's brand image be tarnished as a result?Will Apple try to sue Iran over trademark infringement?Or will they begrudgingly accept the inevitable Jobs/Ahmadinejad comparisons as having a tiny hint of truth?I kid, I kid.
I know you how you guys love to quash dissent ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096372</id>
	<title>Re:Now with 100\% more Goatse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265051640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just clicked on the one link in the article, got redirected to a GNAA shock site and AVG just detected a virus install attempt.</p><p>Not great publicity, slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just clicked on the one link in the article , got redirected to a GNAA shock site and AVG just detected a virus install attempt.Not great publicity , slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just clicked on the one link in the article, got redirected to a GNAA shock site and AVG just detected a virus install attempt.Not great publicity, slashdot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31105600</id>
	<title>Strange ironies in fundamental Islam</title>
	<author>theolein</author>
	<datestamp>1265885340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find it particularly strange that Islamists of the more radical type have a special hatred for the West in general and the USA in particular "because they support the Zionist oppressors in Palestine" yet none of them say one single word about the Chinese suppression of Muslims in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xinjiang" title="wikipedia.org">Xinjiang</a> [wikipedia.org] where Muslims truly are oppressed, where they are only allowed to pray when and where the state allows them to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find it particularly strange that Islamists of the more radical type have a special hatred for the West in general and the USA in particular " because they support the Zionist oppressors in Palestine " yet none of them say one single word about the Chinese suppression of Muslims in Xinjiang [ wikipedia.org ] where Muslims truly are oppressed , where they are only allowed to pray when and where the state allows them to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find it particularly strange that Islamists of the more radical type have a special hatred for the West in general and the USA in particular "because they support the Zionist oppressors in Palestine" yet none of them say one single word about the Chinese suppression of Muslims in Xinjiang [wikipedia.org] where Muslims truly are oppressed, where they are only allowed to pray when and where the state allows them to.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092624</id>
	<title>Re:China lead the way.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265027640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Because, as China has shown, censoring communication is the fastest and easiest way to built trust. Go Iran!</p></div><p>I perceive you are trying to be sarcastic, but it seems to be the truth.<br>Sure, china has alienated as small number of discontents.  But the general consensus among the population seems to be that China's censorship is a good thing.<br>Kind of like a truly friendly big brother (a phrase itself laden with much more positive overtones in China than in the west).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because , as China has shown , censoring communication is the fastest and easiest way to built trust .
Go Iran ! I perceive you are trying to be sarcastic , but it seems to be the truth.Sure , china has alienated as small number of discontents .
But the general consensus among the population seems to be that China 's censorship is a good thing.Kind of like a truly friendly big brother ( a phrase itself laden with much more positive overtones in China than in the west ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because, as China has shown, censoring communication is the fastest and easiest way to built trust.
Go Iran!I perceive you are trying to be sarcastic, but it seems to be the truth.Sure, china has alienated as small number of discontents.
But the general consensus among the population seems to be that China's censorship is a good thing.Kind of like a truly friendly big brother (a phrase itself laden with much more positive overtones in China than in the west).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31093192</id>
	<title>Re:Iran threatens with a "punch" for Feb. 11th</title>
	<author>WCMI92</author>
	<datestamp>1265030520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I bet #3. A high alt nuke detonation. Purpose: To create an EMP powerful enough to wipe out communications along Europe and the Middle East.</p><p>If you can't fight and their level, bring em down a notch so you now can.</p></div><p>If Iran does something like that (and the people in charge are actually insane enough to try it) there won't BE an Iran anymore within hours of that.  They can't have more than a couple small nukes at most, hardly enough to cripple all of Europe with EMP, much less the entire Western world.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet # 3 .
A high alt nuke detonation .
Purpose : To create an EMP powerful enough to wipe out communications along Europe and the Middle East.If you ca n't fight and their level , bring em down a notch so you now can.If Iran does something like that ( and the people in charge are actually insane enough to try it ) there wo n't BE an Iran anymore within hours of that .
They ca n't have more than a couple small nukes at most , hardly enough to cripple all of Europe with EMP , much less the entire Western world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet #3.
A high alt nuke detonation.
Purpose: To create an EMP powerful enough to wipe out communications along Europe and the Middle East.If you can't fight and their level, bring em down a notch so you now can.If Iran does something like that (and the people in charge are actually insane enough to try it) there won't BE an Iran anymore within hours of that.
They can't have more than a couple small nukes at most, hardly enough to cripple all of Europe with EMP, much less the entire Western world.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31100448</id>
	<title>Time to start encrypting emails.</title>
	<author>Wolfier</author>
	<datestamp>1265907720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I haven't in the past, but I guess it's a good time to start doing so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have n't in the past , but I guess it 's a good time to start doing so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I haven't in the past, but I guess it's a good time to start doing so.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096362</id>
	<title>Re:Now with 100\% more Goatse</title>
	<author>appleguru</author>
	<datestamp>1265051400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yup, verified... Tried in comment number 8, succeeded to escape the  in Comment # 10 in TFA.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yup , verified... Tried in comment number 8 , succeeded to escape the in Comment # 10 in TFA .
: -/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yup, verified... Tried in comment number 8, succeeded to escape the  in Comment # 10 in TFA.
:-/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31097300</id>
	<title>Re:Now with 100\% more Goatse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265883600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>me too. at work!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>me too .
at work !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>me too.
at work!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096372</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091472</id>
	<title>Normal</title>
	<author>BCW2</author>
	<datestamp>1265021820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Totalitarian governments are afraid of anything they can't control.<br>Gee, compares nicely with Obama's attitude towards Fox and the Internet doesn't it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Totalitarian governments are afraid of anything they ca n't control.Gee , compares nicely with Obama 's attitude towards Fox and the Internet does n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Totalitarian governments are afraid of anything they can't control.Gee, compares nicely with Obama's attitude towards Fox and the Internet doesn't it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31093480</id>
	<title>Re:Iran Shmiran</title>
	<author>pclminion</author>
	<datestamp>1265032200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Absolutely right, the best way to prevent millions of people from being oppressed by their government is to just KILL them all. You can't be oppressed if you're dead, right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Absolutely right , the best way to prevent millions of people from being oppressed by their government is to just KILL them all .
You ca n't be oppressed if you 're dead , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Absolutely right, the best way to prevent millions of people from being oppressed by their government is to just KILL them all.
You can't be oppressed if you're dead, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091136</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091604</id>
	<title>the real reason</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1265022300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Iran just doesn't want the Chinese to be reading Iranian dissident mail before they do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Iran just does n't want the Chinese to be reading Iranian dissident mail before they do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Iran just doesn't want the Chinese to be reading Iranian dissident mail before they do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092386</id>
	<title>Re:I've seen the Beta!</title>
	<author>martin-boundary</author>
	<datestamp>1265025900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey??! You say that like you wrote that slashdot comment yourself!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey ? ? !
You say that like you wrote that slashdot comment yourself !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey??!
You say that like you wrote that slashdot comment yourself!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091384</id>
	<title>Possible national mottos for current regime</title>
	<author>presidenteloco</author>
	<datestamp>1265021460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Iran Away!</p><p>Iran T</p><p>Iran dom</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Iran Away ! Iran TIran dom</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Iran Away!Iran TIran dom</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091408</id>
	<title>Re:Regime Change Now</title>
	<author>russotto</author>
	<datestamp>1265021580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This radical regime has no compunction about killing its own citizens, and it has continuously described its intention to destroy another sovereign country. Regime change needs to happen now, or else the world will sleep through a future preventable calamity yet again.</p></div></blockquote><p>Look, Bush and Cheney are no longer in office, will you stop with the complaints?</p><p>Wait, you weren't talking about the United States?  Isn't this Slashdot?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This radical regime has no compunction about killing its own citizens , and it has continuously described its intention to destroy another sovereign country .
Regime change needs to happen now , or else the world will sleep through a future preventable calamity yet again.Look , Bush and Cheney are no longer in office , will you stop with the complaints ? Wait , you were n't talking about the United States ?
Is n't this Slashdot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This radical regime has no compunction about killing its own citizens, and it has continuously described its intention to destroy another sovereign country.
Regime change needs to happen now, or else the world will sleep through a future preventable calamity yet again.Look, Bush and Cheney are no longer in office, will you stop with the complaints?Wait, you weren't talking about the United States?
Isn't this Slashdot?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091136</id>
	<title>Iran Shmiran</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265020620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Just nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Just nuke the site from orbit .
It 's the only way to be sure .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Just nuke the site from orbit.
It's the only way to be sure.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091724</id>
	<title>Re:China lead the way.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265022780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You act as though the Iranian government believes it's own propaganda.  Who ever said propaganda was supposed to be true, or believable?  You act surprised, but in reality totalitarianism is the rule in human history, not the exception.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You act as though the Iranian government believes it 's own propaganda .
Who ever said propaganda was supposed to be true , or believable ?
You act surprised , but in reality totalitarianism is the rule in human history , not the exception .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You act as though the Iranian government believes it's own propaganda.
Who ever said propaganda was supposed to be true, or believable?
You act surprised, but in reality totalitarianism is the rule in human history, not the exception.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091920</id>
	<title>Re:Regime Change Now</title>
	<author>Grishnakh</author>
	<datestamp>1265023560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And who's going to effect the regime change?</p><p>The last time the US did that in Iran, they installed the Shah, who was even worse than the nuts who are there now.  So you certainly can't trust the US to do the right thing; all they want is a friendly puppet who will give them easy access to the oil.</p><p>If the Iranian people want regime change, they need to do it themselves.  No one else can give you freedom; if you want freedom, you have to fight for it yourself.  If the Iranian people aren't willing to go to these lengths, then they need to just be happy with Ahmadinejad and the rest of their current government.</p><p>It probably would be helpful, however, if some civilized nations would secretly ship some containers of arms and ammunition in there, however, and perhaps train people on guerrilla tactics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And who 's going to effect the regime change ? The last time the US did that in Iran , they installed the Shah , who was even worse than the nuts who are there now .
So you certainly ca n't trust the US to do the right thing ; all they want is a friendly puppet who will give them easy access to the oil.If the Iranian people want regime change , they need to do it themselves .
No one else can give you freedom ; if you want freedom , you have to fight for it yourself .
If the Iranian people are n't willing to go to these lengths , then they need to just be happy with Ahmadinejad and the rest of their current government.It probably would be helpful , however , if some civilized nations would secretly ship some containers of arms and ammunition in there , however , and perhaps train people on guerrilla tactics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And who's going to effect the regime change?The last time the US did that in Iran, they installed the Shah, who was even worse than the nuts who are there now.
So you certainly can't trust the US to do the right thing; all they want is a friendly puppet who will give them easy access to the oil.If the Iranian people want regime change, they need to do it themselves.
No one else can give you freedom; if you want freedom, you have to fight for it yourself.
If the Iranian people aren't willing to go to these lengths, then they need to just be happy with Ahmadinejad and the rest of their current government.It probably would be helpful, however, if some civilized nations would secretly ship some containers of arms and ammunition in there, however, and perhaps train people on guerrilla tactics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31098504</id>
	<title>a sad state of affairs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265897760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>though honestly, how much worse is this than the FBI being allowed to monitor our page view history by making our ISPs keep two years worth of records on everyone's activities.....</p><p>We are Iran.  We do not do this google-ing, as you call it.  We will kill all infidels that google.  Freedom to all Iranians.  As long as they do not google.  Or speak.  Or go outside of their homes or government working places between the hours of midnight and 11:59 pm.  Thank you to all of our many supporters for their cooperation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>though honestly , how much worse is this than the FBI being allowed to monitor our page view history by making our ISPs keep two years worth of records on everyone 's activities.....We are Iran .
We do not do this google-ing , as you call it .
We will kill all infidels that google .
Freedom to all Iranians .
As long as they do not google .
Or speak .
Or go outside of their homes or government working places between the hours of midnight and 11 : 59 pm .
Thank you to all of our many supporters for their cooperation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>though honestly, how much worse is this than the FBI being allowed to monitor our page view history by making our ISPs keep two years worth of records on everyone's activities.....We are Iran.
We do not do this google-ing, as you call it.
We will kill all infidels that google.
Freedom to all Iranians.
As long as they do not google.
Or speak.
Or go outside of their homes or government working places between the hours of midnight and 11:59 pm.
Thank you to all of our many supporters for their cooperation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31102616</id>
	<title>Followup Interview</title>
	<author>ThatsNotPudding</author>
	<datestamp>1265917560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Reporter to Iranian spokesman: "Will you be banning Yahoo Mail as well?"<br>
Iranian spokesman: "No - Yahoo Mail is a threat to no one."<br>/rimshot</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reporter to Iranian spokesman : " Will you be banning Yahoo Mail as well ?
" Iranian spokesman : " No - Yahoo Mail is a threat to no one .
" /rimshot</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reporter to Iranian spokesman: "Will you be banning Yahoo Mail as well?
"
Iranian spokesman: "No - Yahoo Mail is a threat to no one.
"/rimshot</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31093066</id>
	<title>Re:Iran threatens with a "punch" for Feb. 11th</title>
	<author>Ogi\_UnixNut</author>
	<datestamp>1265029920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which will not do anything much except ruin the economies of said countries (and make China jump for joy, as we have to rebuy all the electronic stuff to get on our feet again). </p><p>
Nearly all military tech is EMP resistant, so all you'll do is piss off countries who now have no other functioning system except the military (which is still more advanced than Iran's). Their economies most likely severely contracting due to the loss of data/technology will result in massive unemployment, who will be ample ground for military recruitment.</p><p>To put it simply, Iran would be in for a world of pain if they did something like that. Crazy as the authorities may be, I think they love their power more than the urge to bring Armageddon upon them. I think they can be considered a rational actor. Their suppression of dissent shows that their primary concern is staying in power (with all the perks that entails) rather than being suicidal.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which will not do anything much except ruin the economies of said countries ( and make China jump for joy , as we have to rebuy all the electronic stuff to get on our feet again ) .
Nearly all military tech is EMP resistant , so all you 'll do is piss off countries who now have no other functioning system except the military ( which is still more advanced than Iran 's ) .
Their economies most likely severely contracting due to the loss of data/technology will result in massive unemployment , who will be ample ground for military recruitment.To put it simply , Iran would be in for a world of pain if they did something like that .
Crazy as the authorities may be , I think they love their power more than the urge to bring Armageddon upon them .
I think they can be considered a rational actor .
Their suppression of dissent shows that their primary concern is staying in power ( with all the perks that entails ) rather than being suicidal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which will not do anything much except ruin the economies of said countries (and make China jump for joy, as we have to rebuy all the electronic stuff to get on our feet again).
Nearly all military tech is EMP resistant, so all you'll do is piss off countries who now have no other functioning system except the military (which is still more advanced than Iran's).
Their economies most likely severely contracting due to the loss of data/technology will result in massive unemployment, who will be ample ground for military recruitment.To put it simply, Iran would be in for a world of pain if they did something like that.
Crazy as the authorities may be, I think they love their power more than the urge to bring Armageddon upon them.
I think they can be considered a rational actor.
Their suppression of dissent shows that their primary concern is staying in power (with all the perks that entails) rather than being suicidal.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091316</id>
	<title>Re:Build trust?</title>
	<author>Un pobre guey</author>
	<datestamp>1265021160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fear, trust, whatever. Same difference.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fear , trust , whatever .
Same difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fear, trust, whatever.
Same difference.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091892</id>
	<title>Will this be secure?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265023380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe Americans should be using Iranmail instead of Google.  At least then we'd know the US gestapo wasn't reading it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe Americans should be using Iranmail instead of Google .
At least then we 'd know the US gestapo was n't reading it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe Americans should be using Iranmail instead of Google.
At least then we'd know the US gestapo wasn't reading it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31098556</id>
	<title>Re:China lead the way.</title>
	<author>RobNich</author>
	<datestamp>1265898300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I were you, I wouldn't place much stock in an opinion poll of residents of a Communist country. Asking those who can't speak freely what they think of the people that control their speech? What do you expect them to say?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I were you , I would n't place much stock in an opinion poll of residents of a Communist country .
Asking those who ca n't speak freely what they think of the people that control their speech ?
What do you expect them to say ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I were you, I wouldn't place much stock in an opinion poll of residents of a Communist country.
Asking those who can't speak freely what they think of the people that control their speech?
What do you expect them to say?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091392</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095794</id>
	<title>Re:China lead the way.</title>
	<author>tompaulco</author>
	<datestamp>1265046360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Right! At least that's what all my friends in China say when they e-mail me.</i> <br>
Like little Lisa Simpsons' pen pal.<br>
"Dear Lisa, as I write this, I am very sad.  Our
       president has been overthrown and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...
       replaced by the benevolent general Krull.  All hail Krull and his
       glorious new regime!  Sincerely, Little Girl."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Right !
At least that 's what all my friends in China say when they e-mail me .
Like little Lisa Simpsons ' pen pal .
" Dear Lisa , as I write this , I am very sad .
Our president has been overthrown and .. . replaced by the benevolent general Krull .
All hail Krull and his glorious new regime !
Sincerely , Little Girl .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right!
At least that's what all my friends in China say when they e-mail me.
Like little Lisa Simpsons' pen pal.
"Dear Lisa, as I write this, I am very sad.
Our
       president has been overthrown and ...
       replaced by the benevolent general Krull.
All hail Krull and his
       glorious new regime!
Sincerely, Little Girl.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091612</id>
	<title>Re:Build trust?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265022360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those of us in the US will understand the language.  Iran has a central, government email system to build trust.  We have the PATRIOT Act to protect freedom.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those of us in the US will understand the language .
Iran has a central , government email system to build trust .
We have the PATRIOT Act to protect freedom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those of us in the US will understand the language.
Iran has a central, government email system to build trust.
We have the PATRIOT Act to protect freedom.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31094180</id>
	<title>Re:Regime Change Now</title>
	<author>chilvence</author>
	<datestamp>1265035200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> however, if some civilized nations would secretly ship some containers of arms and ammunition in there, however, and perhaps train people on guerrilla tactics.</p></div><p>I suppose you'd also be in favour of giving knives to kids who get bullied, so that the problem neatly solves itself eh?  No forget what I said, I am sure you have given your opinion much careful thought!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>however , if some civilized nations would secretly ship some containers of arms and ammunition in there , however , and perhaps train people on guerrilla tactics.I suppose you 'd also be in favour of giving knives to kids who get bullied , so that the problem neatly solves itself eh ?
No forget what I said , I am sure you have given your opinion much careful thought !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> however, if some civilized nations would secretly ship some containers of arms and ammunition in there, however, and perhaps train people on guerrilla tactics.I suppose you'd also be in favour of giving knives to kids who get bullied, so that the problem neatly solves itself eh?
No forget what I said, I am sure you have given your opinion much careful thought!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091626</id>
	<title>I think it's a good idea</title>
	<author>maas15</author>
	<datestamp>1265022420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ignoring for a moment that this will give the Iranian government a high level of control over standard email communications, (ignoring, IGNORING), I think this is actually a very good idea.

Think of it as a technological tariff on free internet services, with the intent to create jobs and a demand for technologically adept people. It's almost benevolent (if it wasn't for the unfettered access to other's communications part).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ignoring for a moment that this will give the Iranian government a high level of control over standard email communications , ( ignoring , IGNORING ) , I think this is actually a very good idea .
Think of it as a technological tariff on free internet services , with the intent to create jobs and a demand for technologically adept people .
It 's almost benevolent ( if it was n't for the unfettered access to other 's communications part ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ignoring for a moment that this will give the Iranian government a high level of control over standard email communications, (ignoring, IGNORING), I think this is actually a very good idea.
Think of it as a technological tariff on free internet services, with the intent to create jobs and a demand for technologically adept people.
It's almost benevolent (if it wasn't for the unfettered access to other's communications part).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31103834</id>
	<title>Re:China lead the way.</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1265921820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Next up: US and EU.</i></p><p>No, they're not so hamfisted.  They'll just require an Internet Driver's License.  It'll be to stop spam and protect the children from pornography.  It'll be verified identity and software will be required to include their keys in encrypted communications.  GMail will seem better if you're just using it to trade cupcake recipes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Next up : US and EU.No , they 're not so hamfisted .
They 'll just require an Internet Driver 's License .
It 'll be to stop spam and protect the children from pornography .
It 'll be verified identity and software will be required to include their keys in encrypted communications .
GMail will seem better if you 're just using it to trade cupcake recipes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next up: US and EU.No, they're not so hamfisted.
They'll just require an Internet Driver's License.
It'll be to stop spam and protect the children from pornography.
It'll be verified identity and software will be required to include their keys in encrypted communications.
GMail will seem better if you're just using it to trade cupcake recipes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091662</id>
	<title>This means WAR!!!</title>
	<author>RedTeflon</author>
	<datestamp>1265022540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We will let you have those WMD's but this is the last straw.  You better let Google mine your data or else we will release the hounds.  You have been warned.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We will let you have those WMD 's but this is the last straw .
You better let Google mine your data or else we will release the hounds .
You have been warned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We will let you have those WMD's but this is the last straw.
You better let Google mine your data or else we will release the hounds.
You have been warned.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096708</id>
	<title>Colopure Cleanse</title>
	<author>jossejerrad</author>
	<datestamp>1265919420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Iranian telecommunications agency will soon debut its new e-mail service, which Iranian officials hope will help develop national technologies and foster a certain level of trust between the government and its citizens.
<a href="http://www.articlesbase.com/health-articles/colopure-cleanse-reviews-free-trial-available-1846975.html" title="articlesbase.com" rel="nofollow">Colopure Cleanse</a> [articlesbase.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Iranian telecommunications agency will soon debut its new e-mail service , which Iranian officials hope will help develop national technologies and foster a certain level of trust between the government and its citizens .
Colopure Cleanse [ articlesbase.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Iranian telecommunications agency will soon debut its new e-mail service, which Iranian officials hope will help develop national technologies and foster a certain level of trust between the government and its citizens.
Colopure Cleanse [articlesbase.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091406</id>
	<title>Re:Build trust?</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1265021580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But it will force people to trust the government with all of their personal e-mails! How is that not building trust?</p><p>(Yes, obviously there is something wrong with this picture.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But it will force people to trust the government with all of their personal e-mails !
How is that not building trust ?
( Yes , obviously there is something wrong with this picture .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it will force people to trust the government with all of their personal e-mails!
How is that not building trust?
(Yes, obviously there is something wrong with this picture.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091192</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092172</id>
	<title>Re:Regime Change Now</title>
	<author>kalidasa</author>
	<datestamp>1265024580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, but it needs to happen without our "help." you can't force democracy down someone's throat at the point of a gun (Germany and Japan are exceptions, as the occupations of those countries were justified in the minds of their citizens by the nature of the conflict). Read @oxfordgirl on Twitter to get some idea of how pro-Western, secularist Iranian Greens feel about our "help."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but it needs to happen without our " help .
" you ca n't force democracy down someone 's throat at the point of a gun ( Germany and Japan are exceptions , as the occupations of those countries were justified in the minds of their citizens by the nature of the conflict ) .
Read @ oxfordgirl on Twitter to get some idea of how pro-Western , secularist Iranian Greens feel about our " help .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but it needs to happen without our "help.
" you can't force democracy down someone's throat at the point of a gun (Germany and Japan are exceptions, as the occupations of those countries were justified in the minds of their citizens by the nature of the conflict).
Read @oxfordgirl on Twitter to get some idea of how pro-Western, secularist Iranian Greens feel about our "help.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092560</id>
	<title>Re:Regime Change Now</title>
	<author>Vancorps</author>
	<datestamp>1265027160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Precisely what France did during the U.S. revolutionary war. Of course that is also what the U.S. did to Iran when it was a democracy. Regime change is a crap shoot, you have to make sure you do it for the right reasons. Contributing the to the fall of a democracy wasn't a good idea for the U.S. and in many ways has led us where we are today. Naturally like in Iraq we end up facing opposing forces with weapons that we sold them. Risky business arms dealing is. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Precisely what France did during the U.S. revolutionary war .
Of course that is also what the U.S. did to Iran when it was a democracy .
Regime change is a crap shoot , you have to make sure you do it for the right reasons .
Contributing the to the fall of a democracy was n't a good idea for the U.S. and in many ways has led us where we are today .
Naturally like in Iraq we end up facing opposing forces with weapons that we sold them .
Risky business arms dealing is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Precisely what France did during the U.S. revolutionary war.
Of course that is also what the U.S. did to Iran when it was a democracy.
Regime change is a crap shoot, you have to make sure you do it for the right reasons.
Contributing the to the fall of a democracy wasn't a good idea for the U.S. and in many ways has led us where we are today.
Naturally like in Iraq we end up facing opposing forces with weapons that we sold them.
Risky business arms dealing is. </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091820</id>
	<title>Re:Iran threatens with a "punch" for Feb. 11th</title>
	<author>DigiShaman</author>
	<datestamp>1265023080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bet #3. A high alt nuke detonation. Purpose: To create an EMP powerful enough to wipe out communications along Europe and the Middle East.</p><p>If you can't fight and their level, bring em down a notch so you now can.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet # 3 .
A high alt nuke detonation .
Purpose : To create an EMP powerful enough to wipe out communications along Europe and the Middle East.If you ca n't fight and their level , bring em down a notch so you now can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet #3.
A high alt nuke detonation.
Purpose: To create an EMP powerful enough to wipe out communications along Europe and the Middle East.If you can't fight and their level, bring em down a notch so you now can.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091596</id>
	<title>Motto</title>
	<author>R3coiler</author>
	<datestamp>1265022300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google's motto: Don't be evil.<br>Iran's motto: If it isn't evil, ban it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google 's motto : Do n't be evil.Iran 's motto : If it is n't evil , ban it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google's motto: Don't be evil.Iran's motto: If it isn't evil, ban it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096992</id>
	<title>Reversal reversed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265879100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In soviet Iran, you suspend Google.</p><p>In capitalist America, Google suspends you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In soviet Iran , you suspend Google.In capitalist America , Google suspends you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In soviet Iran, you suspend Google.In capitalist America, Google suspends you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31097378</id>
	<title>an iranian national security perspective</title>
	<author>TheDataBase</author>
	<datestamp>1265884500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>well,

from an iranian national security perspective:
<br>

it is better that the iranian government monitor it's people than Google in USA !!!<br> <br>

"I think judgment matters. If you have something that you don&rsquo;t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn&rsquo;t be doing it in the first place. If you really need that kind of privacy, the reality is that search engines &mdash; including Google &mdash; do retain this information for some time and it&rsquo;s important, for example, that we are all subject in the United States to the Patriot Act and it is possible that all that information could be made available to the authorities." <br>
Google's CEO Eric Schmidt</htmltext>
<tokenext>well , from an iranian national security perspective : it is better that the iranian government monitor it 's people than Google in USA ! ! !
" I think judgment matters .
If you have something that you don    t want anyone to know , maybe you shouldn    t be doing it in the first place .
If you really need that kind of privacy , the reality is that search engines    including Google    do retain this information for some time and it    s important , for example , that we are all subject in the United States to the Patriot Act and it is possible that all that information could be made available to the authorities .
" Google 's CEO Eric Schmidt</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well,

from an iranian national security perspective:


it is better that the iranian government monitor it's people than Google in USA !!!
"I think judgment matters.
If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place.
If you really need that kind of privacy, the reality is that search engines — including Google — do retain this information for some time and it’s important, for example, that we are all subject in the United States to the Patriot Act and it is possible that all that information could be made available to the authorities.
" 
Google's CEO Eric Schmidt</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095720</id>
	<title>Now with 100\% more Goatse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265045700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cross site scripting attack in the comments of the article. Now redirects to a goatse site. Click at your own risk (or disable javascript). Perhaps the link should be removed until it's fixed<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cross site scripting attack in the comments of the article .
Now redirects to a goatse site .
Click at your own risk ( or disable javascript ) .
Perhaps the link should be removed until it 's fixed .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cross site scripting attack in the comments of the article.
Now redirects to a goatse site.
Click at your own risk (or disable javascript).
Perhaps the link should be removed until it's fixed ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091314</id>
	<title>Iran threatens with a "punch" for Feb. 11th</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265021160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The Iranian nation, with its unity and God's grace, will punch the arrogance (of Western powers) on the 22nd of Bahman (Feb 11) in a way that will leave them stunned," Khamenei declared Monday.</p><p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle\_east/8508813.stm" title="bbc.co.uk">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle\_east/8508813.stm</a> [bbc.co.uk]</p><p><a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=124681" title="wnd.com">http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=124681</a> [wnd.com]</p><p>Empty threat or glass parking lot in Tel Aviv? What are they up to?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The Iranian nation , with its unity and God 's grace , will punch the arrogance ( of Western powers ) on the 22nd of Bahman ( Feb 11 ) in a way that will leave them stunned , " Khamenei declared Monday.http : //news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle \ _east/8508813.stm [ bbc.co.uk ] http : //www.wnd.com/index.php ? fa = PAGE.view&amp;pageId = 124681 [ wnd.com ] Empty threat or glass parking lot in Tel Aviv ?
What are they up to ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The Iranian nation, with its unity and God's grace, will punch the arrogance (of Western powers) on the 22nd of Bahman (Feb 11) in a way that will leave them stunned," Khamenei declared Monday.http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle\_east/8508813.stm [bbc.co.uk]http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=124681 [wnd.com]Empty threat or glass parking lot in Tel Aviv?
What are they up to?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31097846</id>
	<title>http://jacobian.web.id</title>
	<author>jacobian64</author>
	<datestamp>1265889900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>another hypocrisy of iranian government statement</htmltext>
<tokenext>another hypocrisy of iranian government statement</tokentext>
<sentencetext>another hypocrisy of iranian government statement</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31101658</id>
	<title>They believe only in monopolies?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265914200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"Iran's telecommunications agency announced that it would be suspending Google's email services permanently, saying it would roll out its own national email service."</i> <br>
&nbsp; <br>They can't have both?  What about Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail, etc?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Iran 's telecommunications agency announced that it would be suspending Google 's email services permanently , saying it would roll out its own national email service .
"   They ca n't have both ?
What about Yahoo , AOL , Hotmail , etc ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Iran's telecommunications agency announced that it would be suspending Google's email services permanently, saying it would roll out its own national email service.
" 
  They can't have both?
What about Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail, etc?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31093100</id>
	<title>Re:Clipper Chip deja vu?</title>
	<author>cryfreedomlove</author>
	<datestamp>1265030040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is a big different between Clipper Chip's failure in the USA and what is going on in Iran.  Clipper Chip failed <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper\_chip" title="wikipedia.org"> because it was openly and publicly challenged by US citizens</a> [wikipedia.org].  None of those citizens were beaten, jailed, or murdered for protesting Clipper.  Can you say that the same right to protest will be respected in Iran under the current government?</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a big different between Clipper Chip 's failure in the USA and what is going on in Iran .
Clipper Chip failed because it was openly and publicly challenged by US citizens [ wikipedia.org ] .
None of those citizens were beaten , jailed , or murdered for protesting Clipper .
Can you say that the same right to protest will be respected in Iran under the current government ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a big different between Clipper Chip's failure in the USA and what is going on in Iran.
Clipper Chip failed  because it was openly and publicly challenged by US citizens [wikipedia.org].
None of those citizens were beaten, jailed, or murdered for protesting Clipper.
Can you say that the same right to protest will be respected in Iran under the current government?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091342</id>
	<title>Regime Change Now</title>
	<author>Apple Acolyte</author>
	<datestamp>1265021220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This radical regime has no compunction about killing its own citizens, and it has continuously described its intention to destroy another sovereign country. Regime change needs to happen now, or else the world will sleep through a future preventable calamity yet again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This radical regime has no compunction about killing its own citizens , and it has continuously described its intention to destroy another sovereign country .
Regime change needs to happen now , or else the world will sleep through a future preventable calamity yet again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This radical regime has no compunction about killing its own citizens, and it has continuously described its intention to destroy another sovereign country.
Regime change needs to happen now, or else the world will sleep through a future preventable calamity yet again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091192</id>
	<title>Build trust?</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1265020800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this the same Irani government which torturers people to try and gain Facebook passwords so they can better track groups who want to discuss politics freely?</p><p>Forcing users to use a government monitored service doesn't sound like something that would build trust. It sounds like a move to crush dissent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this the same Irani government which torturers people to try and gain Facebook passwords so they can better track groups who want to discuss politics freely ? Forcing users to use a government monitored service does n't sound like something that would build trust .
It sounds like a move to crush dissent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this the same Irani government which torturers people to try and gain Facebook passwords so they can better track groups who want to discuss politics freely?Forcing users to use a government monitored service doesn't sound like something that would build trust.
It sounds like a move to crush dissent.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092486</id>
	<title>Why the sudden need to build trust?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265026560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who is going to come to trust whom?  Anti-government dissidents aren't going to start trusting their government over this, and the government isn't going to start trusting its dissidents.  So the only actors we're left with here are the government and your everyday citizen.  So why the need all of the sudden to build trust?  Is Iran admitting its general population doesn't trust the government?  Is it admitting it doesn't trust its general population?</p><p>Classic doublethink.  You're expected to simultaneously believe a) this trust issue needs some serious fixing and b) there are no trust issues between the people and government.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who is going to come to trust whom ?
Anti-government dissidents are n't going to start trusting their government over this , and the government is n't going to start trusting its dissidents .
So the only actors we 're left with here are the government and your everyday citizen .
So why the need all of the sudden to build trust ?
Is Iran admitting its general population does n't trust the government ?
Is it admitting it does n't trust its general population ? Classic doublethink .
You 're expected to simultaneously believe a ) this trust issue needs some serious fixing and b ) there are no trust issues between the people and government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who is going to come to trust whom?
Anti-government dissidents aren't going to start trusting their government over this, and the government isn't going to start trusting its dissidents.
So the only actors we're left with here are the government and your everyday citizen.
So why the need all of the sudden to build trust?
Is Iran admitting its general population doesn't trust the government?
Is it admitting it doesn't trust its general population?Classic doublethink.
You're expected to simultaneously believe a) this trust issue needs some serious fixing and b) there are no trust issues between the people and government.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092102</id>
	<title>Ominous timing...</title>
	<author>dwiget001</author>
	<datestamp>1265024220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The day before the Iran will "strike a telling blow" to the West.</p><p>There are no coincidences, nosirree.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The day before the Iran will " strike a telling blow " to the West.There are no coincidences , nosirree .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The day before the Iran will "strike a telling blow" to the West.There are no coincidences, nosirree.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091346</id>
	<title>Re:China lead the way.</title>
	<author>flitty</author>
	<datestamp>1265021280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Because, as China has shown, censoring communication is the fastest and easiest way to built trust." Go Iran!
<br> <br>
Right! At least that's what all my friends in China say when they e-mail me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Because , as China has shown , censoring communication is the fastest and easiest way to built trust .
" Go Iran !
Right ! At least that 's what all my friends in China say when they e-mail me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Because, as China has shown, censoring communication is the fastest and easiest way to built trust.
" Go Iran!
Right! At least that's what all my friends in China say when they e-mail me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096542</id>
	<title>Link in story is hacked?</title>
	<author>bhagwad</author>
	<datestamp>1265053620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I click on the link in the story, I go to a site that takes over the computer and says "I'm looking at gay porno" at full volume! T'was a bitch to regain control of the system. Any clues as to what's happening?</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I click on the link in the story , I go to a site that takes over the computer and says " I 'm looking at gay porno " at full volume !
T'was a bitch to regain control of the system .
Any clues as to what 's happening ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I click on the link in the story, I go to a site that takes over the computer and says "I'm looking at gay porno" at full volume!
T'was a bitch to regain control of the system.
Any clues as to what's happening?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31097404</id>
	<title>bad website.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265884800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The website seems to be under attack.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The website seems to be under attack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The website seems to be under attack.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091322</id>
	<title>Re:China lead the way.</title>
	<author>eparker05</author>
	<datestamp>1265021160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the mind of a tyrant:<br>Trust == respect == fear</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the mind of a tyrant : Trust = = respect = = fear</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the mind of a tyrant:Trust == respect == fear</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091516</id>
	<title>Would?</title>
	<author>mosb1000</author>
	<datestamp>1265022000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Iran's telecommunications agency announced that it would be suspending Google's email services permanently, saying it <b>would</b> roll out its own national email service.</p></div></blockquote><p>I think it may be a better to roll out the replacement <b>before</b> blocking Google.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Iran 's telecommunications agency announced that it would be suspending Google 's email services permanently , saying it would roll out its own national email service.I think it may be a better to roll out the replacement before blocking Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Iran's telecommunications agency announced that it would be suspending Google's email services permanently, saying it would roll out its own national email service.I think it may be a better to roll out the replacement before blocking Google.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31098556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31097476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31097300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31094180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091824
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31093192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31097390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091322
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31093066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31101718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091136
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31093480
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096362
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31103834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091406
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091480
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31105600
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31109242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091724
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31093100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092172
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31099090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095752
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_10_2125242_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091384
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091692
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091412
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091140
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095740
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31103834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091480
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31105600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091392
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31098556
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091322
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091346
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095794
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091186
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096198
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091150
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091892
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096542
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092556
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091358
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091948
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091124
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31101718
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091612
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091472
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095752
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31093100
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091646
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091920
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092560
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31094180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091408
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092386
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092066
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096372
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31109242
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31097390
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096934
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31097476
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31097300
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31096362
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091464
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091450
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31093480
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091820
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31093066
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31093192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31099090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091788
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31091824
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31095394
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_10_2125242.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_10_2125242.31092102
</commentlist>
</conversation>
