<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_09_1811250</id>
	<title>The Hidden Treasures of Sysinternals</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1265744880000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Barence writes <i>"PC Pro contributing editor Jon Honeyball has written a nice feature on the latest <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/realworld/355420/the-hidden-treasures-of-sysinternals">treasures to be found on the Windows Sysinternals website</a>. Among them are a tool for creating virtual hard disks from physical drives, a hard disk read-write monitoring tool, and a utility for putting ISO images onto flash drives. They're free, but they're effective."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Barence writes " PC Pro contributing editor Jon Honeyball has written a nice feature on the latest treasures to be found on the Windows Sysinternals website .
Among them are a tool for creating virtual hard disks from physical drives , a hard disk read-write monitoring tool , and a utility for putting ISO images onto flash drives .
They 're free , but they 're effective .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Barence writes "PC Pro contributing editor Jon Honeyball has written a nice feature on the latest treasures to be found on the Windows Sysinternals website.
Among them are a tool for creating virtual hard disks from physical drives, a hard disk read-write monitoring tool, and a utility for putting ISO images onto flash drives.
They're free, but they're effective.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076910</id>
	<title>Re:It's all stuff that ships with Linux</title>
	<author>Zironic</author>
	<datestamp>1265706000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which would be awesome and all if anyone cared<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</p><p>Linux desktop penetration is what, 2\%? (random guess)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which would be awesome and all if anyone cared : pLinux desktop penetration is what , 2 \ % ?
( random guess )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which would be awesome and all if anyone cared :pLinux desktop penetration is what, 2\%?
(random guess)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078366</id>
	<title>Re:Those that do not understand UNIX</title>
	<author>jgtg32a</author>
	<datestamp>1265711700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe but I would love for you to point me in the direction of a tool that is half as awesome as process explorer <br>
&nbsp; <br>Seriously though, me love you long time</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe but I would love for you to point me in the direction of a tool that is half as awesome as process explorer   Seriously though , me love you long time</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe but I would love for you to point me in the direction of a tool that is half as awesome as process explorer 
  Seriously though, me love you long time</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077336</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082862</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>xtracto</author>
	<datestamp>1265056800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IIRC Microsoft bought Sysinternals a bit after the Sony Rootkit fiasco, which was put to light by Mark.</p><p>When I came to know that Mark was going to Microsoft I was sad. Not because of "the dark side" or whatnot, but because I though the public lost an intelligent, independent and very knowledgable (spell?) public opinion.</p><p>It is *very* very very unlikely that Mark would do a similar thing that he did with Sony when he was independent as now his voice and actions are controlled by the MS PR.</p><p>That is what really made me sad.</p><p>xtracto</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IIRC Microsoft bought Sysinternals a bit after the Sony Rootkit fiasco , which was put to light by Mark.When I came to know that Mark was going to Microsoft I was sad .
Not because of " the dark side " or whatnot , but because I though the public lost an intelligent , independent and very knowledgable ( spell ?
) public opinion.It is * very * very very unlikely that Mark would do a similar thing that he did with Sony when he was independent as now his voice and actions are controlled by the MS PR.That is what really made me sad.xtracto</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IIRC Microsoft bought Sysinternals a bit after the Sony Rootkit fiasco, which was put to light by Mark.When I came to know that Mark was going to Microsoft I was sad.
Not because of "the dark side" or whatnot, but because I though the public lost an intelligent, independent and very knowledgable (spell?
) public opinion.It is *very* very very unlikely that Mark would do a similar thing that he did with Sony when he was independent as now his voice and actions are controlled by the MS PR.That is what really made me sad.xtracto</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077226</id>
	<title>Re:Is time for multidesktop for windows?</title>
	<author>sjaskow</author>
	<datestamp>1265707200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um, have you tried Virtual Dimension: <a href="http://virt-dimension.sourceforge.net/" title="sourceforge.net" rel="nofollow">http://virt-dimension.sourceforge.net/</a> [sourceforge.net] ?  I don't know if it works on &gt; Vista but it has worked great for me on Windows 2000 and XP.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , have you tried Virtual Dimension : http : //virt-dimension.sourceforge.net/ [ sourceforge.net ] ?
I do n't know if it works on &gt; Vista but it has worked great for me on Windows 2000 and XP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, have you tried Virtual Dimension: http://virt-dimension.sourceforge.net/ [sourceforge.net] ?
I don't know if it works on &gt; Vista but it has worked great for me on Windows 2000 and XP.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077284</id>
	<title>Re:Is time for multidesktop for windows?</title>
	<author>strength\_of\_10\_men</author>
	<datestamp>1265707440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> The guy behind sysinternals tried to, and was almost a success, but nope.</p></div><p>Is the failure you're talking about <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/cc817881.aspx" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">this</a> [microsoft.com]?
</p><p>What are the shortcomings of Sysinternals' Desktops?
</p><p>I haven't tried other solutions but I occasionally use this and it works fairly well.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The guy behind sysinternals tried to , and was almost a success , but nope.Is the failure you 're talking about this [ microsoft.com ] ?
What are the shortcomings of Sysinternals ' Desktops ?
I have n't tried other solutions but I occasionally use this and it works fairly well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> The guy behind sysinternals tried to, and was almost a success, but nope.Is the failure you're talking about this [microsoft.com]?
What are the shortcomings of Sysinternals' Desktops?
I haven't tried other solutions but I occasionally use this and it works fairly well.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077212</id>
	<title>Re:Is time for multidesktop for windows?</title>
	<author>Spad</author>
	<datestamp>1265707140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Powershell is a massive improvement over the traditional Windows console (which really hasn't changed significantly since the early DOS days); yes, it is in part just a re-implementation of  but it is a joy to work with as a Windows admin.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Powershell is a massive improvement over the traditional Windows console ( which really has n't changed significantly since the early DOS days ) ; yes , it is in part just a re-implementation of but it is a joy to work with as a Windows admin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Powershell is a massive improvement over the traditional Windows console (which really hasn't changed significantly since the early DOS days); yes, it is in part just a re-implementation of  but it is a joy to work with as a Windows admin.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078602</id>
	<title>Re:It's all stuff that ships with Linux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265712720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jesus, shut the fuck up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jesus , shut the fuck up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jesus, shut the fuck up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079168</id>
	<title>Sysinternals Rocks!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265715180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have to add my voice to the chorus praising Mark and Sysinternals. His stuff is great and I have enjoyed his books on windows internals as well as having used his tools for years. As an old time VMS kernel programmer, I can see the kinship with VMS -- still my long term favorite OS for rock-solid commercial performance. His tools gave me a way of peering into the sphagetti of windows and understanding what was messing with what. The disk IO trace and procexp have helped me many times. This should not be a hidden gem, but then, there are places where mortals were not meant to look -- I doubt that anyone with the skills and testicular veracity to reach into an OSs' guts doesn't know this stuff exists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to add my voice to the chorus praising Mark and Sysinternals .
His stuff is great and I have enjoyed his books on windows internals as well as having used his tools for years .
As an old time VMS kernel programmer , I can see the kinship with VMS -- still my long term favorite OS for rock-solid commercial performance .
His tools gave me a way of peering into the sphagetti of windows and understanding what was messing with what .
The disk IO trace and procexp have helped me many times .
This should not be a hidden gem , but then , there are places where mortals were not meant to look -- I doubt that anyone with the skills and testicular veracity to reach into an OSs ' guts does n't know this stuff exists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to add my voice to the chorus praising Mark and Sysinternals.
His stuff is great and I have enjoyed his books on windows internals as well as having used his tools for years.
As an old time VMS kernel programmer, I can see the kinship with VMS -- still my long term favorite OS for rock-solid commercial performance.
His tools gave me a way of peering into the sphagetti of windows and understanding what was messing with what.
The disk IO trace and procexp have helped me many times.
This should not be a hidden gem, but then, there are places where mortals were not meant to look -- I doubt that anyone with the skills and testicular veracity to reach into an OSs' guts doesn't know this stuff exists.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082934</id>
	<title>There are other ways to do that</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265057340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With Grub4dos you can put a bunch of bootable isos and floppies on a flash drive, or on one dvd <a href="http://grub4dos.sourceforge.net/" title="sourceforge.net" rel="nofollow">http://grub4dos.sourceforge.net/</a> [sourceforge.net]</p><p>Admittedly there are some subtleties to doing it that way, but I've done it for a long time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With Grub4dos you can put a bunch of bootable isos and floppies on a flash drive , or on one dvd http : //grub4dos.sourceforge.net/ [ sourceforge.net ] Admittedly there are some subtleties to doing it that way , but I 've done it for a long time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With Grub4dos you can put a bunch of bootable isos and floppies on a flash drive, or on one dvd http://grub4dos.sourceforge.net/ [sourceforge.net]Admittedly there are some subtleties to doing it that way, but I've done it for a long time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076862</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077922</id>
	<title>Re:Latest, Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265710140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, DiskMon is old and has been replaced by a better tool: Process Monitor.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , DiskMon is old and has been replaced by a better tool : Process Monitor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, DiskMon is old and has been replaced by a better tool: Process Monitor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31081256</id>
	<title>Obligatory yes but</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265728020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>does it run on Linux</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>does it run on Linux</tokentext>
<sentencetext>does it run on Linux</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077144</id>
	<title>disk2vhd</title>
	<author>micromuncher</author>
	<datestamp>1265706840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This was a god send to me, after VMWare Converter could not/would not convert a machine of mine, even after registry and driver cleaning, it just failed near the end without a meaningful error message in the log.</p><p>I used disk2vhd, booted up the image in VirtualBox, and bingo - working image.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This was a god send to me , after VMWare Converter could not/would not convert a machine of mine , even after registry and driver cleaning , it just failed near the end without a meaningful error message in the log.I used disk2vhd , booted up the image in VirtualBox , and bingo - working image .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was a god send to me, after VMWare Converter could not/would not convert a machine of mine, even after registry and driver cleaning, it just failed near the end without a meaningful error message in the log.I used disk2vhd, booted up the image in VirtualBox, and bingo - working image.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078030</id>
	<title>Re:Is time for multidesktop for windows?</title>
	<author>Antity-H</author>
	<datestamp>1265710560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just wish they would include some kind of sed in the default shell</p><p>oh and while I am at it, how about a way to set a variable from the result of an expression without resorting to a pseudo for loop ?<br>you know something like<br>set var=`echo toto`<br>instead of<br>for<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/F \%\%x in (`echo toto`) do set var=\%\%x</p><p>even better how about an improved version of echo which would be able to write the following to a file when \%var\% is  1 ?<br>echo var=\%var\%&gt;&gt;test.bat</p><p>try it and have sooooo much fun discovering that the "right" syntax is<br>echo var=^\%var\%&gt;&gt;test.bat</p><p>how sick is that ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just wish they would include some kind of sed in the default shelloh and while I am at it , how about a way to set a variable from the result of an expression without resorting to a pseudo for loop ? you know something likeset var = ` echo toto ` instead offor /F \ % \ % x in ( ` echo toto ` ) do set var = \ % \ % xeven better how about an improved version of echo which would be able to write the following to a file when \ % var \ % is 1 ? echo var = \ % var \ % &gt; &gt; test.battry it and have sooooo much fun discovering that the " right " syntax isecho var = ^ \ % var \ % &gt; &gt; test.bathow sick is that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just wish they would include some kind of sed in the default shelloh and while I am at it, how about a way to set a variable from the result of an expression without resorting to a pseudo for loop ?you know something likeset var=`echo toto`instead offor /F \%\%x in (`echo toto`) do set var=\%\%xeven better how about an improved version of echo which would be able to write the following to a file when \%var\% is  1 ?echo var=\%var\%&gt;&gt;test.battry it and have sooooo much fun discovering that the "right" syntax isecho var=^\%var\%&gt;&gt;test.bathow sick is that ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082460</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265741760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>could you send me a copy of that? You're right, I can't seem to find it anywhere.<br>tiltowait at hotmail</p><p>thanks!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>could you send me a copy of that ?
You 're right , I ca n't seem to find it anywhere.tiltowait at hotmailthanks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>could you send me a copy of that?
You're right, I can't seem to find it anywhere.tiltowait at hotmailthanks!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078146</id>
	<title>Other Sysinternals tools</title>
	<author>the\_saint1138</author>
	<datestamp>1265710980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Slightly off-topic, but I just wanted to say that sysinternals' Process Explorer and Autoruns are the two most valuable anti-virus tools on the planet. No Windows-savvy geek should be caught without them.

Also, I've yet to see a nicer interface on any linux tool that does the same.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Slightly off-topic , but I just wanted to say that sysinternals ' Process Explorer and Autoruns are the two most valuable anti-virus tools on the planet .
No Windows-savvy geek should be caught without them .
Also , I 've yet to see a nicer interface on any linux tool that does the same .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slightly off-topic, but I just wanted to say that sysinternals' Process Explorer and Autoruns are the two most valuable anti-virus tools on the planet.
No Windows-savvy geek should be caught without them.
Also, I've yet to see a nicer interface on any linux tool that does the same.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31084696</id>
	<title>Re:It's all stuff that ships with Linux</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1265034780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Let me see if I've got this straight. A great set of tools that run on Windows demonstrates how rubbish Windows is. A great set of tools that run on Linux demonstrates how fantastic Linux is.</i></p><p>The point is not about how good the sysinternals tools are, but what it took to write them.  Mark Russovich did an amazing job reverse engineering Windows to do what he did, but somebody with 1/10th of the work and savvy could have pieced the same level of information about Linux just by either asking the right people (who are not under NDA because its open source), or, just looking at the source.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me see if I 've got this straight .
A great set of tools that run on Windows demonstrates how rubbish Windows is .
A great set of tools that run on Linux demonstrates how fantastic Linux is.The point is not about how good the sysinternals tools are , but what it took to write them .
Mark Russovich did an amazing job reverse engineering Windows to do what he did , but somebody with 1/10th of the work and savvy could have pieced the same level of information about Linux just by either asking the right people ( who are not under NDA because its open source ) , or , just looking at the source .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me see if I've got this straight.
A great set of tools that run on Windows demonstrates how rubbish Windows is.
A great set of tools that run on Linux demonstrates how fantastic Linux is.The point is not about how good the sysinternals tools are, but what it took to write them.
Mark Russovich did an amazing job reverse engineering Windows to do what he did, but somebody with 1/10th of the work and savvy could have pieced the same level of information about Linux just by either asking the right people (who are not under NDA because its open source), or, just looking at the source.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076796</id>
	<title>First?</title>
	<author>I\_have\_a\_life</author>
	<datestamp>1265748780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Process Explorer is what Windows should ship with instead of task manager.
</p><p>
Process Monitor is so kick ass... I can't even put it in words.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Process Explorer is what Windows should ship with instead of task manager .
Process Monitor is so kick ass... I ca n't even put it in words .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Process Explorer is what Windows should ship with instead of task manager.
Process Monitor is so kick ass... I can't even put it in words.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077888</id>
	<title>Re:It's all stuff that ships with Linux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265709960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Try PowerShell - you won't BASH again<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Try PowerShell - you wo n't BASH again : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try PowerShell - you won't BASH again :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31081012</id>
	<title>Re:free BUT effective</title>
	<author>CubicleView</author>
	<datestamp>1265726040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree with the parent, but you could agrue that due to the quality of most of the "free" apps available out there, only a negligable amount of them would be considered effective.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree with the parent , but you could agrue that due to the quality of most of the " free " apps available out there , only a negligable amount of them would be considered effective .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree with the parent, but you could agrue that due to the quality of most of the "free" apps available out there, only a negligable amount of them would be considered effective.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792</id>
	<title>It's all stuff that ships with Linux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265748780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, sysinternals was amazing piece of reverse engineering work and some of the utilities that came out of it were pretty interesting as examples of that reverse engineering work.</p><p>But...</p><p>All that stuff is junk compared to what Linux does for utilities!</p><p>I mean, my ubuntu has had burning ISOs and copying them any which way now for at leas 5 years.   I can type sensors and get the motherboard temperature, fan speeds, everything.  I mean, if you are into doing hardware and low level OS hardware interfacing stuff, there's enough gobblygook in<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/proc to keep anyone happy from Linux, and then there's all the log files and then the source.</p><p>I mean, yeah, Windows has its advantages, but sysinternals isn't one of them.  sysinternals is just proof that for a lot of applications you have to be a hero to get it to do anything simply because the source is closed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , sysinternals was amazing piece of reverse engineering work and some of the utilities that came out of it were pretty interesting as examples of that reverse engineering work.But...All that stuff is junk compared to what Linux does for utilities ! I mean , my ubuntu has had burning ISOs and copying them any which way now for at leas 5 years .
I can type sensors and get the motherboard temperature , fan speeds , everything .
I mean , if you are into doing hardware and low level OS hardware interfacing stuff , there 's enough gobblygook in /proc to keep anyone happy from Linux , and then there 's all the log files and then the source.I mean , yeah , Windows has its advantages , but sysinternals is n't one of them .
sysinternals is just proof that for a lot of applications you have to be a hero to get it to do anything simply because the source is closed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, sysinternals was amazing piece of reverse engineering work and some of the utilities that came out of it were pretty interesting as examples of that reverse engineering work.But...All that stuff is junk compared to what Linux does for utilities!I mean, my ubuntu has had burning ISOs and copying them any which way now for at leas 5 years.
I can type sensors and get the motherboard temperature, fan speeds, everything.
I mean, if you are into doing hardware and low level OS hardware interfacing stuff, there's enough gobblygook in /proc to keep anyone happy from Linux, and then there's all the log files and then the source.I mean, yeah, Windows has its advantages, but sysinternals isn't one of them.
sysinternals is just proof that for a lot of applications you have to be a hero to get it to do anything simply because the source is closed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079782</id>
	<title>Re:For speedy access</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265717940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great link! Thanks.</p><p>And to have them all on your USB stick, just cd to it, and do :</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; wget -cm <a href="http://live.sysinternals.com/" title="sysinternals.com">http://live.sysinternals.com/</a> [sysinternals.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great link !
Thanks.And to have them all on your USB stick , just cd to it , and do :       wget -cm http : //live.sysinternals.com/ [ sysinternals.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great link!
Thanks.And to have them all on your USB stick, just cd to it, and do :
      wget -cm http://live.sysinternals.com/ [sysinternals.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077172</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077690</id>
	<title>We've had them on UNIX for ages now!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265709180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While his tools are by far extremely useful when using Windows, I've always found it hilarious that we've had similar commands bundled with UNIX and UNIX-like systems for decades now.</p><p>I mean, the dd command takes care of "creating virtual hard disks from physical drives" and "putting ISO images onto flash drives". Commands like iostat and iotop take care of "hard disk read-write monitoring". And they're present even in the most basic of installations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While his tools are by far extremely useful when using Windows , I 've always found it hilarious that we 've had similar commands bundled with UNIX and UNIX-like systems for decades now.I mean , the dd command takes care of " creating virtual hard disks from physical drives " and " putting ISO images onto flash drives " .
Commands like iostat and iotop take care of " hard disk read-write monitoring " .
And they 're present even in the most basic of installations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While his tools are by far extremely useful when using Windows, I've always found it hilarious that we've had similar commands bundled with UNIX and UNIX-like systems for decades now.I mean, the dd command takes care of "creating virtual hard disks from physical drives" and "putting ISO images onto flash drives".
Commands like iostat and iotop take care of "hard disk read-write monitoring".
And they're present even in the most basic of installations.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076882</id>
	<title>Latest, Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265749140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have been using SysInternals stuff starting from TCPView, which was pretty useful for me back then. But how exactly is DiskMon a latest treasure? It's been around for ages, unless now it monitors on kernel level.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have been using SysInternals stuff starting from TCPView , which was pretty useful for me back then .
But how exactly is DiskMon a latest treasure ?
It 's been around for ages , unless now it monitors on kernel level .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have been using SysInternals stuff starting from TCPView, which was pretty useful for me back then.
But how exactly is DiskMon a latest treasure?
It's been around for ages, unless now it monitors on kernel level.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31080650</id>
	<title>MOD PARENT UP!</title>
	<author>chevman</author>
	<datestamp>1265723280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>MOD PARENT UP!</htmltext>
<tokenext>MOD PARENT UP !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MOD PARENT UP!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077432</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1265708100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The Hidden Treasures of Sysinternals"</p><p>Why are they hidden? This is the sort of thing that should be documented. Of course, MS documantation is completely lame. Half the time when I hit F1 trying to find out how to do something in MS Access, it points me to a nonexistant menu item. It makes me think of the late Lilly Tomlin's "Ernestine the telephone operator" -- "We're the phone company. We don't HAVE To."</p><p>People badmouth Linux docs, but I have a far easier time finding how to do something in Linux than Windows. How good is Apple documentation?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The Hidden Treasures of Sysinternals " Why are they hidden ?
This is the sort of thing that should be documented .
Of course , MS documantation is completely lame .
Half the time when I hit F1 trying to find out how to do something in MS Access , it points me to a nonexistant menu item .
It makes me think of the late Lilly Tomlin 's " Ernestine the telephone operator " -- " We 're the phone company .
We do n't HAVE To .
" People badmouth Linux docs , but I have a far easier time finding how to do something in Linux than Windows .
How good is Apple documentation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The Hidden Treasures of Sysinternals"Why are they hidden?
This is the sort of thing that should be documented.
Of course, MS documantation is completely lame.
Half the time when I hit F1 trying to find out how to do something in MS Access, it points me to a nonexistant menu item.
It makes me think of the late Lilly Tomlin's "Ernestine the telephone operator" -- "We're the phone company.
We don't HAVE To.
"People badmouth Linux docs, but I have a far easier time finding how to do something in Linux than Windows.
How good is Apple documentation?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076916</id>
	<title>Be careful using the P2V tool.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265706000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tried using it on my box as a backup tool for a clean install of Win7.  AVOID IF YOU ARE GOING TO USE THE SAME PHYSICAL DRIVE.  Windows 7 couldn't mount or boot it.  Known issue, and extremely aggravating.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tried using it on my box as a backup tool for a clean install of Win7 .
AVOID IF YOU ARE GOING TO USE THE SAME PHYSICAL DRIVE .
Windows 7 could n't mount or boot it .
Known issue , and extremely aggravating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tried using it on my box as a backup tool for a clean install of Win7.
AVOID IF YOU ARE GOING TO USE THE SAME PHYSICAL DRIVE.
Windows 7 couldn't mount or boot it.
Known issue, and extremely aggravating.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077356</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>Jeng</author>
	<datestamp>1265707800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And here I thought that Mark got hired to turn Windows Vista into Windows 7.  ( I have no idea, but it was my thought at the time that they bought the best kernal hacker out there to redo Vista. )</p><p>Glad to see that not only are Marks old free tools still free, but that Microsoft is allowing new tools of his to be free also.  Very un-microsoft of microsoft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And here I thought that Mark got hired to turn Windows Vista into Windows 7 .
( I have no idea , but it was my thought at the time that they bought the best kernal hacker out there to redo Vista .
) Glad to see that not only are Marks old free tools still free , but that Microsoft is allowing new tools of his to be free also .
Very un-microsoft of microsoft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And here I thought that Mark got hired to turn Windows Vista into Windows 7.
( I have no idea, but it was my thought at the time that they bought the best kernal hacker out there to redo Vista.
)Glad to see that not only are Marks old free tools still free, but that Microsoft is allowing new tools of his to be free also.
Very un-microsoft of microsoft.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082594</id>
	<title>Is there a tool for this?</title>
	<author>hackingbear</author>
	<datestamp>1265744220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have been frustrated by the inability to safe-remove / unmount a removable drive in Windows Vista. The Safe-Remove tool comes with the system works poorly. A lot of times, even if my drive has been idled for over two days, it cannot stop the system daemon svchost,  which is the only program accessing the drive as shown in the resource monitor. It forces me to shut down the system. Is there a tool to force the programs and the system daemon to give up accessing the drive? Something this generic is not searchable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have been frustrated by the inability to safe-remove / unmount a removable drive in Windows Vista .
The Safe-Remove tool comes with the system works poorly .
A lot of times , even if my drive has been idled for over two days , it can not stop the system daemon svchost , which is the only program accessing the drive as shown in the resource monitor .
It forces me to shut down the system .
Is there a tool to force the programs and the system daemon to give up accessing the drive ?
Something this generic is not searchable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have been frustrated by the inability to safe-remove / unmount a removable drive in Windows Vista.
The Safe-Remove tool comes with the system works poorly.
A lot of times, even if my drive has been idled for over two days, it cannot stop the system daemon svchost,  which is the only program accessing the drive as shown in the resource monitor.
It forces me to shut down the system.
Is there a tool to force the programs and the system daemon to give up accessing the drive?
Something this generic is not searchable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31081428</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>Gr8Apes</author>
	<datestamp>1265729400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>People badmouth Linux docs, but I have a far easier time finding how to do something in Linux than Windows. How good is Apple documentation?</p></div><p>Let's put it this way, a 3 year old's chicken scratch on toilet paper that's been flushed down the toilet, retrieved from the sewer and dried is more useful than most MS documentation.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>People badmouth Linux docs , but I have a far easier time finding how to do something in Linux than Windows .
How good is Apple documentation ? Let 's put it this way , a 3 year old 's chicken scratch on toilet paper that 's been flushed down the toilet , retrieved from the sewer and dried is more useful than most MS documentation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People badmouth Linux docs, but I have a far easier time finding how to do something in Linux than Windows.
How good is Apple documentation?Let's put it this way, a 3 year old's chicken scratch on toilet paper that's been flushed down the toilet, retrieved from the sewer and dried is more useful than most MS documentation.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079554</id>
	<title>Umm</title>
	<author>The MAZZTer</author>
	<datestamp>1265716740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The ISO tool isn't by Sysinternals, and Filemon (he said that instead of Diskmon) has been discontinued in favor of the more versatile Process Monitor.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The ISO tool is n't by Sysinternals , and Filemon ( he said that instead of Diskmon ) has been discontinued in favor of the more versatile Process Monitor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The ISO tool isn't by Sysinternals, and Filemon (he said that instead of Diskmon) has been discontinued in favor of the more versatile Process Monitor.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082288</id>
	<title>Re:Is time for multidesktop for windows?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265740020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>One of the reasons I can't use Windows for real work is because of the lack of multidesktop. For me is very important the ability to switch from one desktop to other, never having the screen of the taskbar cluttered, having my "graphic things" open in a desktop, and my "programming things" in other. I can't understand how people can work withouth it. Is like browsing withouth tabs, only worse<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></div><p>Some years back I upgraded my system and started using dual monitors. Don't know how I lived without it, but I did. Same thing for tabbed browsing, as you mentioned.</p><p>I do wish that MS would add the multi-desktop idea, but it's not a huge deal for me. Right now I have 2 widescreens for my primary box, and about a half dozen monitors connected to various other boxes. A little more work sometimes, but not a significant dent in my productivity, as most of the screens are busy doing stuff in the background anyhow.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the reasons I ca n't use Windows for real work is because of the lack of multidesktop .
For me is very important the ability to switch from one desktop to other , never having the screen of the taskbar cluttered , having my " graphic things " open in a desktop , and my " programming things " in other .
I ca n't understand how people can work withouth it .
Is like browsing withouth tabs , only worse : - ) Some years back I upgraded my system and started using dual monitors .
Do n't know how I lived without it , but I did .
Same thing for tabbed browsing , as you mentioned.I do wish that MS would add the multi-desktop idea , but it 's not a huge deal for me .
Right now I have 2 widescreens for my primary box , and about a half dozen monitors connected to various other boxes .
A little more work sometimes , but not a significant dent in my productivity , as most of the screens are busy doing stuff in the background anyhow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the reasons I can't use Windows for real work is because of the lack of multidesktop.
For me is very important the ability to switch from one desktop to other, never having the screen of the taskbar cluttered, having my "graphic things" open in a desktop, and my "programming things" in other.
I can't understand how people can work withouth it.
Is like browsing withouth tabs, only worse :-)Some years back I upgraded my system and started using dual monitors.
Don't know how I lived without it, but I did.
Same thing for tabbed browsing, as you mentioned.I do wish that MS would add the multi-desktop idea, but it's not a huge deal for me.
Right now I have 2 widescreens for my primary box, and about a half dozen monitors connected to various other boxes.
A little more work sometimes, but not a significant dent in my productivity, as most of the screens are busy doing stuff in the background anyhow.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077184</id>
	<title>Performance Monitor</title>
	<author>rwa2</author>
	<datestamp>1265707020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Barely related to the topic (except that the Sysinternals monitors did a lot of this first), but I've had limited success googling...</p><p>The Windows 7 Performance Monitor is very very nice... what utilities under Linux would give it similar abilities to show per-process cpu/mem/disk/network/file/I/O usage?</p><p>So far I've managed to scrape together a variety of disparate tools to report on most of those things, but it would be nice if it could all be builtin to e.g. gkrellm or gnome-system-monitor or something.</p><p>* (the venerable) top: for sorting by CPU / mem virtual/reserved/shared, but not much else.<br>* iftop, ntop : to show realtime network activity per host:port (not just an aggregate for the interface).  It would be nice to also be able to see net activity per process, though.<br>* dstat, sar : can print out some disk I/O related numbers at intervals, suitable for plotting.  But "dstat --top-bio" only lists the process using the most disk I/O.  And other than running "lsof" and trying to manually correlate PIDs, is there a way to actually figure out what file is being written / read?<br>* ltrace, strace, and dtrace : can tap into a running program and show library and sys.os function calls, (such as files being opened, etc.) but they put in some execution overhead.<br>* pmap : for digging into memory mapped to processes; would be neat to be able to visualize this... e.g. to see what apps have how much memory swapped to disk, or if something is still mapped to an older version of a shared library after an upgrade, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Barely related to the topic ( except that the Sysinternals monitors did a lot of this first ) , but I 've had limited success googling...The Windows 7 Performance Monitor is very very nice... what utilities under Linux would give it similar abilities to show per-process cpu/mem/disk/network/file/I/O usage ? So far I 've managed to scrape together a variety of disparate tools to report on most of those things , but it would be nice if it could all be builtin to e.g .
gkrellm or gnome-system-monitor or something .
* ( the venerable ) top : for sorting by CPU / mem virtual/reserved/shared , but not much else .
* iftop , ntop : to show realtime network activity per host : port ( not just an aggregate for the interface ) .
It would be nice to also be able to see net activity per process , though .
* dstat , sar : can print out some disk I/O related numbers at intervals , suitable for plotting .
But " dstat --top-bio " only lists the process using the most disk I/O .
And other than running " lsof " and trying to manually correlate PIDs , is there a way to actually figure out what file is being written / read ?
* ltrace , strace , and dtrace : can tap into a running program and show library and sys.os function calls , ( such as files being opened , etc .
) but they put in some execution overhead .
* pmap : for digging into memory mapped to processes ; would be neat to be able to visualize this... e.g. to see what apps have how much memory swapped to disk , or if something is still mapped to an older version of a shared library after an upgrade , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Barely related to the topic (except that the Sysinternals monitors did a lot of this first), but I've had limited success googling...The Windows 7 Performance Monitor is very very nice... what utilities under Linux would give it similar abilities to show per-process cpu/mem/disk/network/file/I/O usage?So far I've managed to scrape together a variety of disparate tools to report on most of those things, but it would be nice if it could all be builtin to e.g.
gkrellm or gnome-system-monitor or something.
* (the venerable) top: for sorting by CPU / mem virtual/reserved/shared, but not much else.
* iftop, ntop : to show realtime network activity per host:port (not just an aggregate for the interface).
It would be nice to also be able to see net activity per process, though.
* dstat, sar : can print out some disk I/O related numbers at intervals, suitable for plotting.
But "dstat --top-bio" only lists the process using the most disk I/O.
And other than running "lsof" and trying to manually correlate PIDs, is there a way to actually figure out what file is being written / read?
* ltrace, strace, and dtrace : can tap into a running program and show library and sys.os function calls, (such as files being opened, etc.
) but they put in some execution overhead.
* pmap : for digging into memory mapped to processes; would be neat to be able to visualize this... e.g. to see what apps have how much memory swapped to disk, or if something is still mapped to an older version of a shared library after an upgrade, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31083018</id>
	<title>Re:windowssucks tag?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265014860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>finding the mounds of not-actually-temporary temporary files that both Windows and a lot of applications like to consume unreasonable amounts of drive space with.</i> </p><p>Share with the class please</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>finding the mounds of not-actually-temporary temporary files that both Windows and a lot of applications like to consume unreasonable amounts of drive space with .
Share with the class please</tokentext>
<sentencetext>finding the mounds of not-actually-temporary temporary files that both Windows and a lot of applications like to consume unreasonable amounts of drive space with.
Share with the class please</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078028</id>
	<title>Re:It's all stuff that ships with Linux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265710560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>my ubuntu has had burning ISOs and copying them any which way now for at leas 5 years</p></div><p>Ahhh linux kids. Atleast 5 years!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>my ubuntu has had burning ISOs and copying them any which way now for at leas 5 yearsAhhh linux kids .
Atleast 5 years !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>my ubuntu has had burning ISOs and copying them any which way now for at leas 5 yearsAhhh linux kids.
Atleast 5 years!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078364</id>
	<title>Re:Those that do not understand UNIX</title>
	<author>EvanED</author>
	<datestamp>1265711700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My personal response to that is "Those who <i>do</i> understand Unix are condemned to think it's actually a good idea."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My personal response to that is " Those who do understand Unix are condemned to think it 's actually a good idea .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My personal response to that is "Those who do understand Unix are condemned to think it's actually a good idea.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077336</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31080228</id>
	<title>Re:Free doesn't imply ineffective (and vice-versa)</title>
	<author>WinstonWolfIT</author>
	<datestamp>1265720700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Saying "free but effective" suggests that free <b>suggests</b> ineffective.
</p></div><p>There, fixed that for you. Saying "implies" means a -&gt; b</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Saying " free but effective " suggests that free suggests ineffective .
There , fixed that for you .
Saying " implies " means a - &gt; b</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Saying "free but effective" suggests that free suggests ineffective.
There, fixed that for you.
Saying "implies" means a -&gt; b
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077742</id>
	<title>Re:Whatabout Virtualbox?</title>
	<author>SCPRedMage</author>
	<datestamp>1265709360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/UserManual.html#vdidetails" title="virtualbox.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/UserManual.html#vdidetails</a> [virtualbox.org]
<br> <br>
Third bullet point:<p><div class="quote"><p>VirtualBox also fully supports the VHD format used by Microsoft.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.virtualbox.org/manual/UserManual.html # vdidetails [ virtualbox.org ] Third bullet point : VirtualBox also fully supports the VHD format used by Microsoft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/UserManual.html#vdidetails [virtualbox.org]
 
Third bullet point:VirtualBox also fully supports the VHD format used by Microsoft.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076852</id>
	<title>free BUT effective</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265749020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; They're free, but they're effective.</p><p>What an unusual combination of attributes!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; They 're free , but they 're effective.What an unusual combination of attributes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; They're free, but they're effective.What an unusual combination of attributes!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076864</id>
	<title>What you meant to say...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265749080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; "They're free, but they're effective."</p><p>What you mean to say is, "They're free, <em>and</em> they're effective."</p><p>What kind of free software advocate ARE you???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; " They 're free , but they 're effective .
" What you mean to say is , " They 're free , and they 're effective .
" What kind of free software advocate ARE you ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; "They're free, but they're effective.
"What you mean to say is, "They're free, and they're effective.
"What kind of free software advocate ARE you??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079074</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing hidden about them...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265714760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Careful. If you have SecuROM, it will not allow you to play any SecuROM games while it senses a debugger on your system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Careful .
If you have SecuROM , it will not allow you to play any SecuROM games while it senses a debugger on your system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Careful.
If you have SecuROM, it will not allow you to play any SecuROM games while it senses a debugger on your system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077154</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079842</id>
	<title>Re:the iso to usb tool only accepts win7 isos</title>
	<author>buchanmilne</author>
	<datestamp>1265718240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't use it on all ISOs without first checking if it is required. For example, AFAIK recent Fedora and Mandriva ship hybrid ISOs, using unetbootin is both unnecessary (dd is sufficient to transfer to the ISO to a usb stick such that it will boot, Mandriva provides a GUI tool for Windows and Linux for those who forget to dd to the entire block device, not the partition<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...) and harmful (if you run unetbootin, it will break the feature, and *not* boot from the USB stick).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't use it on all ISOs without first checking if it is required .
For example , AFAIK recent Fedora and Mandriva ship hybrid ISOs , using unetbootin is both unnecessary ( dd is sufficient to transfer to the ISO to a usb stick such that it will boot , Mandriva provides a GUI tool for Windows and Linux for those who forget to dd to the entire block device , not the partition ... ) and harmful ( if you run unetbootin , it will break the feature , and * not * boot from the USB stick ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't use it on all ISOs without first checking if it is required.
For example, AFAIK recent Fedora and Mandriva ship hybrid ISOs, using unetbootin is both unnecessary (dd is sufficient to transfer to the ISO to a usb stick such that it will boot, Mandriva provides a GUI tool for Windows and Linux for those who forget to dd to the entire block device, not the partition ...) and harmful (if you run unetbootin, it will break the feature, and *not* boot from the USB stick).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077866</id>
	<title>"Access Denied"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265709900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Process Explorer kicks the crap out of Task Manager simply for the fact that it doesn't give access denied error messages to admins trying to end protected system processes.  Try ending the same processes with Process Explorer and it "just works" -- which goes to show that the Task Manager error message has nothing to do with actual account privileges.  The first time I found this I realized it's no wonder Windows has such a problem with malware, the applications I run have more access to my system processes than I do!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Process Explorer kicks the crap out of Task Manager simply for the fact that it does n't give access denied error messages to admins trying to end protected system processes .
Try ending the same processes with Process Explorer and it " just works " -- which goes to show that the Task Manager error message has nothing to do with actual account privileges .
The first time I found this I realized it 's no wonder Windows has such a problem with malware , the applications I run have more access to my system processes than I do !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Process Explorer kicks the crap out of Task Manager simply for the fact that it doesn't give access denied error messages to admins trying to end protected system processes.
Try ending the same processes with Process Explorer and it "just works" -- which goes to show that the Task Manager error message has nothing to do with actual account privileges.
The first time I found this I realized it's no wonder Windows has such a problem with malware, the applications I run have more access to my system processes than I do!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31084260</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>ShakaUVM</author>
	<datestamp>1265030520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>And the very first thing they did, within mere days of the acquisition, is they took his ultra-efficient, elegant little tools and put a 200KB EULA popup into every one of them.</p><p>A GUI popup.</p><p>Even into the command line tools.</p></div></blockquote><p>Of course, between Win95 and later versions, they took their GUI "winipconfig", removed the easy to use GUI from it, and re-released it as "ipconfig".</p><p>You know they were thinking, <i>Why on earth should our users simply be able to click to release and renew their DHCP leases? That's too crazy for the average user. Let's make sure they know how to bring up a command line first, to prove they're worthy.</i></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And the very first thing they did , within mere days of the acquisition , is they took his ultra-efficient , elegant little tools and put a 200KB EULA popup into every one of them.A GUI popup.Even into the command line tools.Of course , between Win95 and later versions , they took their GUI " winipconfig " , removed the easy to use GUI from it , and re-released it as " ipconfig " .You know they were thinking , Why on earth should our users simply be able to click to release and renew their DHCP leases ?
That 's too crazy for the average user .
Let 's make sure they know how to bring up a command line first , to prove they 're worthy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the very first thing they did, within mere days of the acquisition, is they took his ultra-efficient, elegant little tools and put a 200KB EULA popup into every one of them.A GUI popup.Even into the command line tools.Of course, between Win95 and later versions, they took their GUI "winipconfig", removed the easy to use GUI from it, and re-released it as "ipconfig".You know they were thinking, Why on earth should our users simply be able to click to release and renew their DHCP leases?
That's too crazy for the average user.
Let's make sure they know how to bring up a command line first, to prove they're worthy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077220</id>
	<title>windowssucks tag?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265707200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, yes, of course Windows sucks, but the SysInternals package really does mitigate the suckage to a surprising degree. Arguably, it's stuff that should have been part of Windows all along. I've been using it for a couple of years and it has made it much, much easier to beat Windows into submission. It's also extremely useful for finding and removing the crap that virus and malware scanners are apparently incapable of dealing with, as well as finding the mounds of not-actually-temporary temporary files that both Windows and a lot of applications like to consume unreasonable amounts of drive space with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , yes , of course Windows sucks , but the SysInternals package really does mitigate the suckage to a surprising degree .
Arguably , it 's stuff that should have been part of Windows all along .
I 've been using it for a couple of years and it has made it much , much easier to beat Windows into submission .
It 's also extremely useful for finding and removing the crap that virus and malware scanners are apparently incapable of dealing with , as well as finding the mounds of not-actually-temporary temporary files that both Windows and a lot of applications like to consume unreasonable amounts of drive space with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, yes, of course Windows sucks, but the SysInternals package really does mitigate the suckage to a surprising degree.
Arguably, it's stuff that should have been part of Windows all along.
I've been using it for a couple of years and it has made it much, much easier to beat Windows into submission.
It's also extremely useful for finding and removing the crap that virus and malware scanners are apparently incapable of dealing with, as well as finding the mounds of not-actually-temporary temporary files that both Windows and a lot of applications like to consume unreasonable amounts of drive space with.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077590</id>
	<title>A non-sysintenrals thing... but....</title>
	<author>mindstrm</author>
	<datestamp>1265708760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not from sysinternals, but for tiny little utils, Spacemonger - the older version - not the new "installable" one - is absolutely fantastic for finding out where disk-space went..... can't live without it in any windows shop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not from sysinternals , but for tiny little utils , Spacemonger - the older version - not the new " installable " one - is absolutely fantastic for finding out where disk-space went..... ca n't live without it in any windows shop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not from sysinternals, but for tiny little utils, Spacemonger - the older version - not the new "installable" one - is absolutely fantastic for finding out where disk-space went..... can't live without it in any windows shop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31080088</id>
	<title>Re:It's all stuff that ships with Linux</title>
	<author>lgw</author>
	<datestamp>1265719800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The NTAPI is largely documented (at least today), the docs just come with the DDK, instead of with Visual Studio.  For more in-depth documentation, there are several <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/driver/wdf/wdfbook.mspx" title="microsoft.com">books</a> [microsoft.com] available from MS authors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The NTAPI is largely documented ( at least today ) , the docs just come with the DDK , instead of with Visual Studio .
For more in-depth documentation , there are several books [ microsoft.com ] available from MS authors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The NTAPI is largely documented (at least today), the docs just come with the DDK, instead of with Visual Studio.
For more in-depth documentation, there are several books [microsoft.com] available from MS authors.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077948</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077230</id>
	<title>Wonderful tools</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265707200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These have been available for a long time, used to just be from a site called Sysinternals run by Russonivich before Microsoft hired him. This guy is, literally, the person who wrote the book on Windows. Windows Internals is the current name, used to be called Inside Windows 2000. A wonderful technical document of the internal workings of Windows.</p><p>At any rate, Russonivich produces extremely useful tools. Not the sort of thing you want in the hands of inexperienced users, as many of them can break your system, but extremely powerful. I use them all the time in the course of my job, especially when there's manual malware removal that needs to be done. So far, malware is unaware of the ability to suspend a process, which Process Explorer will do. So you suspend the malware, its watcher process doesn't know to restart it. You then use autoruns to remove the startup entries. At that point you can reboot, it won't start, and you can clean up the residuals.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These have been available for a long time , used to just be from a site called Sysinternals run by Russonivich before Microsoft hired him .
This guy is , literally , the person who wrote the book on Windows .
Windows Internals is the current name , used to be called Inside Windows 2000 .
A wonderful technical document of the internal workings of Windows.At any rate , Russonivich produces extremely useful tools .
Not the sort of thing you want in the hands of inexperienced users , as many of them can break your system , but extremely powerful .
I use them all the time in the course of my job , especially when there 's manual malware removal that needs to be done .
So far , malware is unaware of the ability to suspend a process , which Process Explorer will do .
So you suspend the malware , its watcher process does n't know to restart it .
You then use autoruns to remove the startup entries .
At that point you can reboot , it wo n't start , and you can clean up the residuals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These have been available for a long time, used to just be from a site called Sysinternals run by Russonivich before Microsoft hired him.
This guy is, literally, the person who wrote the book on Windows.
Windows Internals is the current name, used to be called Inside Windows 2000.
A wonderful technical document of the internal workings of Windows.At any rate, Russonivich produces extremely useful tools.
Not the sort of thing you want in the hands of inexperienced users, as many of them can break your system, but extremely powerful.
I use them all the time in the course of my job, especially when there's manual malware removal that needs to be done.
So far, malware is unaware of the ability to suspend a process, which Process Explorer will do.
So you suspend the malware, its watcher process doesn't know to restart it.
You then use autoruns to remove the startup entries.
At that point you can reboot, it won't start, and you can clean up the residuals.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079206</id>
	<title>Re:It's all stuff that ships with Linux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265715300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>no... a great set of tools that come with Linux compared to a good set of tools that *should* come with Windows demonstrate how crappy Windows is. The logic is pretty simple to follow. Sysinternals are basically just poor attempts to give Windows people almost as much power as a Linux user gets out -of-the-box.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>no... a great set of tools that come with Linux compared to a good set of tools that * should * come with Windows demonstrate how crappy Windows is .
The logic is pretty simple to follow .
Sysinternals are basically just poor attempts to give Windows people almost as much power as a Linux user gets out -of-the-box .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no... a great set of tools that come with Linux compared to a good set of tools that *should* come with Windows demonstrate how crappy Windows is.
The logic is pretty simple to follow.
Sysinternals are basically just poor attempts to give Windows people almost as much power as a Linux user gets out -of-the-box.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079958</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>Anachragnome</author>
	<datestamp>1265718960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft bought Sysinternals because Process Explorer was outing them in terms of what they were doing COVERTLY on Windows machines.</p><p>I proved this to myself by using the latest version of Process Explorer, copying the results, wiping my hard drive (I was about to do a reformat anyways and decided it was a good time to do some experimenting), reinstalling the old, PRE-MS version of Process Explorer (v.10.20)...and getting different results as far as what Microsoft was running in the background. I simply compared the results, and they were different...on the exact same Windows install. I do not remember what was different, nor do I care. The point is that they were HIDING something from Process Explorer (any version post 10.20) now that they had control of the once-3rd-party app.</p><p>Another slimy thing they do is retroactively replace older versions of Process Explorer with the new version ON DEVICES THAT DO NOT EVEN RUN WINDOWS.</p><p>I have numerous thumb-drives that I have wiped entirely clean and installed my own selection of tools and open-source apps on. I then loan them to friends to fix their own machines (as well as provide them with non-MS, non-Adobe alternatives). All of these drives have Process Explorer v10.20 on them. Often, they would be returned only to find that the v10.20 had been over-written with the latest version. It took me a while to figure out what was going on. ANY version of Windows, post XPsp2, has the latest version of Process Explorer buried in it somewhere and will AUTOMATICALLY over-write any old version, REGARDLESS OF WHERE IT IS FOUND. So, if you have v.10.20 on a thumbdrive and plug it into a post-XPsp2 machine, the machine will change the executable on the drive to the latest version without permission. I now have to keep a known-clean version of v10.20 secure from such monkey business.</p><p>Good luck finding version 10.20 though. I ended up having to get my copy from a CHINESE server, as Microsoft had cease-and-desisted everyone offering the old versions even though they were not charging for it.</p><p>To be blunt, I do not trust Sysinternals or any of their products anymore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft bought Sysinternals because Process Explorer was outing them in terms of what they were doing COVERTLY on Windows machines.I proved this to myself by using the latest version of Process Explorer , copying the results , wiping my hard drive ( I was about to do a reformat anyways and decided it was a good time to do some experimenting ) , reinstalling the old , PRE-MS version of Process Explorer ( v.10.20 ) ...and getting different results as far as what Microsoft was running in the background .
I simply compared the results , and they were different...on the exact same Windows install .
I do not remember what was different , nor do I care .
The point is that they were HIDING something from Process Explorer ( any version post 10.20 ) now that they had control of the once-3rd-party app.Another slimy thing they do is retroactively replace older versions of Process Explorer with the new version ON DEVICES THAT DO NOT EVEN RUN WINDOWS.I have numerous thumb-drives that I have wiped entirely clean and installed my own selection of tools and open-source apps on .
I then loan them to friends to fix their own machines ( as well as provide them with non-MS , non-Adobe alternatives ) .
All of these drives have Process Explorer v10.20 on them .
Often , they would be returned only to find that the v10.20 had been over-written with the latest version .
It took me a while to figure out what was going on .
ANY version of Windows , post XPsp2 , has the latest version of Process Explorer buried in it somewhere and will AUTOMATICALLY over-write any old version , REGARDLESS OF WHERE IT IS FOUND .
So , if you have v.10.20 on a thumbdrive and plug it into a post-XPsp2 machine , the machine will change the executable on the drive to the latest version without permission .
I now have to keep a known-clean version of v10.20 secure from such monkey business.Good luck finding version 10.20 though .
I ended up having to get my copy from a CHINESE server , as Microsoft had cease-and-desisted everyone offering the old versions even though they were not charging for it.To be blunt , I do not trust Sysinternals or any of their products anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft bought Sysinternals because Process Explorer was outing them in terms of what they were doing COVERTLY on Windows machines.I proved this to myself by using the latest version of Process Explorer, copying the results, wiping my hard drive (I was about to do a reformat anyways and decided it was a good time to do some experimenting), reinstalling the old, PRE-MS version of Process Explorer (v.10.20)...and getting different results as far as what Microsoft was running in the background.
I simply compared the results, and they were different...on the exact same Windows install.
I do not remember what was different, nor do I care.
The point is that they were HIDING something from Process Explorer (any version post 10.20) now that they had control of the once-3rd-party app.Another slimy thing they do is retroactively replace older versions of Process Explorer with the new version ON DEVICES THAT DO NOT EVEN RUN WINDOWS.I have numerous thumb-drives that I have wiped entirely clean and installed my own selection of tools and open-source apps on.
I then loan them to friends to fix their own machines (as well as provide them with non-MS, non-Adobe alternatives).
All of these drives have Process Explorer v10.20 on them.
Often, they would be returned only to find that the v10.20 had been over-written with the latest version.
It took me a while to figure out what was going on.
ANY version of Windows, post XPsp2, has the latest version of Process Explorer buried in it somewhere and will AUTOMATICALLY over-write any old version, REGARDLESS OF WHERE IT IS FOUND.
So, if you have v.10.20 on a thumbdrive and plug it into a post-XPsp2 machine, the machine will change the executable on the drive to the latest version without permission.
I now have to keep a known-clean version of v10.20 secure from such monkey business.Good luck finding version 10.20 though.
I ended up having to get my copy from a CHINESE server, as Microsoft had cease-and-desisted everyone offering the old versions even though they were not charging for it.To be blunt, I do not trust Sysinternals or any of their products anymore.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31081170</id>
	<title>Mod parent up!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265727300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mod parent up!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod parent up !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod parent up!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31081562</id>
	<title>Re:It's Sysinternals, slashdotters</title>
	<author>Ksevio</author>
	<datestamp>1265730720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So that everyone else doesn't have to check, there isn't actually a porn website called "Sisinternals"...yet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So that everyone else does n't have to check , there is n't actually a porn website called " Sisinternals " ...yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So that everyone else doesn't have to check, there isn't actually a porn website called "Sisinternals"...yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077048</id>
	<title>the iso to usb tool only accepts win7 isos</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265706420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So it's usefulness is kind of limited. If you want to create bootable usb-sticks for other operating systems, check <a href="http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/" title="sourceforge.net" rel="nofollow">http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/</a> [sourceforge.net]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So it 's usefulness is kind of limited .
If you want to create bootable usb-sticks for other operating systems , check http : //unetbootin.sourceforge.net/ [ sourceforge.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it's usefulness is kind of limited.
If you want to create bootable usb-sticks for other operating systems, check http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/ [sourceforge.net]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077422</id>
	<title>The Revised "Hidden Treasures of Sysinternals"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265708100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for botnets.</p><p>Slashdot, should, for liability purposes, post a disclaimer with every story about WinBLOWs software.</p><p>Thanks for NOTHING.</p><p>Yours In Minsk,<br>K. T.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for botnets.Slashdot , should , for liability purposes , post a disclaimer with every story about WinBLOWs software.Thanks for NOTHING.Yours In Minsk,K .
T .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for botnets.Slashdot, should, for liability purposes, post a disclaimer with every story about WinBLOWs software.Thanks for NOTHING.Yours In Minsk,K.
T.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077096</id>
	<title>Jon Honeyball</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265706660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"PC Pro contributing editor Jon Honeyball </i></p><p>Was that his porn star name?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" PC Pro contributing editor Jon Honeyball Was that his porn star name ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"PC Pro contributing editor Jon Honeyball Was that his porn star name?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31083410</id>
	<title>An even better process manager</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1265019720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Process Explorer is what Windows should ship with instead of task manager.</p></div><p>I vote for psdoom<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Process Explorer is what Windows should ship with instead of task manager.I vote for psdoom ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Process Explorer is what Windows should ship with instead of task manager.I vote for psdoom ;-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077800</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265709660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's a reason MS bought the company and hired Mark, he consistently puts out the most useful tools for in the trenches Windows diagnostics. Heck MS's PSS would routinely have you use his tools even before the purchase because nothing they put out internally was nearly as useful.</p></div><p>And the very first thing they did, within mere days of the acquisition, is they took his ultra-efficient, elegant little tools and put a 200KB EULA popup into every one of them.</p><p>A GUI popup.</p><p>Even into the <i>command line tools</i>.</p><p>I threw up in my mouth a little when I saw that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a reason MS bought the company and hired Mark , he consistently puts out the most useful tools for in the trenches Windows diagnostics .
Heck MS 's PSS would routinely have you use his tools even before the purchase because nothing they put out internally was nearly as useful.And the very first thing they did , within mere days of the acquisition , is they took his ultra-efficient , elegant little tools and put a 200KB EULA popup into every one of them.A GUI popup.Even into the command line tools.I threw up in my mouth a little when I saw that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a reason MS bought the company and hired Mark, he consistently puts out the most useful tools for in the trenches Windows diagnostics.
Heck MS's PSS would routinely have you use his tools even before the purchase because nothing they put out internally was nearly as useful.And the very first thing they did, within mere days of the acquisition, is they took his ultra-efficient, elegant little tools and put a 200KB EULA popup into every one of them.A GUI popup.Even into the command line tools.I threw up in my mouth a little when I saw that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078098</id>
	<title>Re:It's all stuff that ships with Linux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265710800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Let me see if I've got this straight.  A great set of tools that run on Windows demonstrates how rubbish Windows is.  A great set of tools that run on Linux demonstrates how fantastic Linux is.</p><p>...</p></div><p>Well, when you're crowing about reinventing iostat:</p><p><b>YES</b>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me see if I 've got this straight .
A great set of tools that run on Windows demonstrates how rubbish Windows is .
A great set of tools that run on Linux demonstrates how fantastic Linux is....Well , when you 're crowing about reinventing iostat : YES .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me see if I've got this straight.
A great set of tools that run on Windows demonstrates how rubbish Windows is.
A great set of tools that run on Linux demonstrates how fantastic Linux is....Well, when you're crowing about reinventing iostat:YES.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077978</id>
	<title>Re:Performance Monitor</title>
	<author>electrostatic</author>
	<datestamp>1265710380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>What's Running</b> is easy to use and provides lots of info on Processes, services, IP connections, modules, drivers, plus associated file locations, memory use, and other bits. <br>
<a href="http://www.whatsrunning.net/main.aspx/" title="whatsrunning.net">http://www.whatsrunning.net/main.aspx/</a> [whatsrunning.net]</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's Running is easy to use and provides lots of info on Processes , services , IP connections , modules , drivers , plus associated file locations , memory use , and other bits .
http : //www.whatsrunning.net/main.aspx/ [ whatsrunning.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's Running is easy to use and provides lots of info on Processes, services, IP connections, modules, drivers, plus associated file locations, memory use, and other bits.
http://www.whatsrunning.net/main.aspx/ [whatsrunning.net]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079296</id>
	<title>Re:windowssucks tag?</title>
	<author>XLR8DST8</author>
	<datestamp>1265715600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>they could include all of it with windows, and have more monopoly charges levied against them. it goes both ways kids.</htmltext>
<tokenext>they could include all of it with windows , and have more monopoly charges levied against them .
it goes both ways kids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they could include all of it with windows, and have more monopoly charges levied against them.
it goes both ways kids.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077442</id>
	<title>Re:First?</title>
	<author>Jeng</author>
	<datestamp>1265708100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stuck on a win2k machine at work, but I was fairly certain that Vista and 7 both came with a very kick ass upgraded process explorer?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stuck on a win2k machine at work , but I was fairly certain that Vista and 7 both came with a very kick ass upgraded process explorer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stuck on a win2k machine at work, but I was fairly certain that Vista and 7 both came with a very kick ass upgraded process explorer?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077810</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265709720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lilly Tomlin is not late, except perhaps for dinner.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lilly Tomlin is not late , except perhaps for dinner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lilly Tomlin is not late, except perhaps for dinner.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31085358</id>
	<title>Re:It's all stuff that ships with Linux</title>
	<author>StuartHankins</author>
	<datestamp>1265038320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whooooshhhh</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whooooshhhh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whooooshhhh</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079404</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>rduke15</author>
	<datestamp>1265716080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How good is Apple documentation?</p></div><p>It has become much better.</p><p>I remember a time in OS9 or early OSX when it was totally useless, doing nothing more than telling you to click here and there (all the obvious things you had already done), and carefully NOT explaining anything.</p><p>When I used 10.5.x for a few months last year and the year before, I easily found the information I needed, and it tended to be detailed enough.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How good is Apple documentation ? It has become much better.I remember a time in OS9 or early OSX when it was totally useless , doing nothing more than telling you to click here and there ( all the obvious things you had already done ) , and carefully NOT explaining anything.When I used 10.5.x for a few months last year and the year before , I easily found the information I needed , and it tended to be detailed enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How good is Apple documentation?It has become much better.I remember a time in OS9 or early OSX when it was totally useless, doing nothing more than telling you to click here and there (all the obvious things you had already done), and carefully NOT explaining anything.When I used 10.5.x for a few months last year and the year before, I easily found the information I needed, and it tended to be detailed enough.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31086588</id>
	<title>Re:Performance Monitor</title>
	<author>rwa2</author>
	<datestamp>1265043720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks for the responses... I'd played with atop and htop before, but not enough to find their useful bits.</p><p>I forgot to mention iotop, which does show which processes are using disk I/O.</p><p>Also just found a nifty thing called smem, which does a pretty nice job showing and sorting which apps have memory swapped out, and how much is shared and unique.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for the responses... I 'd played with atop and htop before , but not enough to find their useful bits.I forgot to mention iotop , which does show which processes are using disk I/O.Also just found a nifty thing called smem , which does a pretty nice job showing and sorting which apps have memory swapped out , and how much is shared and unique .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for the responses... I'd played with atop and htop before, but not enough to find their useful bits.I forgot to mention iotop, which does show which processes are using disk I/O.Also just found a nifty thing called smem, which does a pretty nice job showing and sorting which apps have memory swapped out, and how much is shared and unique.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31080760</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>AbRASiON</author>
	<datestamp>1265724180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nowadays really that isn't that big of a deal, I mean as long as the tools aren't a 50mb download or more.<br>The question is, was anything added to the newer versions? bug fixes or features. Microsoft aren't the best company in the world but improvements are improvements, if something is fixed a binary size 3x larger isn't the worst thing in the world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nowadays really that is n't that big of a deal , I mean as long as the tools are n't a 50mb download or more.The question is , was anything added to the newer versions ?
bug fixes or features .
Microsoft are n't the best company in the world but improvements are improvements , if something is fixed a binary size 3x larger is n't the worst thing in the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nowadays really that isn't that big of a deal, I mean as long as the tools aren't a 50mb download or more.The question is, was anything added to the newer versions?
bug fixes or features.
Microsoft aren't the best company in the world but improvements are improvements, if something is fixed a binary size 3x larger isn't the worst thing in the world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078202</id>
	<title>Re:It's all stuff that ships with Linux</title>
	<author>schon</author>
	<datestamp>1265711100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Let me see if I've got this straight.</p></div><p>Nope, you don't have it "straight".  Allow me to point out where your misunderstanding lies.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>A great set of tools that run on Windows demonstrates how rubbish Windows is. A great set of tools that run on Linux demonstrates how fantastic Linux is.</p></div><p>No, a great set of tools that <i>doesn't come with</i> Windows demonstrates how rubbish Windows is.  A great set of tools that <i>Linux comes with</i> demonstrates how fantastic Linux is.</p><p>I don't blame you for not understanding this - after all, it's only the title of his post, and you only quoted it once.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me see if I 've got this straight.Nope , you do n't have it " straight " .
Allow me to point out where your misunderstanding lies.A great set of tools that run on Windows demonstrates how rubbish Windows is .
A great set of tools that run on Linux demonstrates how fantastic Linux is.No , a great set of tools that does n't come with Windows demonstrates how rubbish Windows is .
A great set of tools that Linux comes with demonstrates how fantastic Linux is.I do n't blame you for not understanding this - after all , it 's only the title of his post , and you only quoted it once .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me see if I've got this straight.Nope, you don't have it "straight".
Allow me to point out where your misunderstanding lies.A great set of tools that run on Windows demonstrates how rubbish Windows is.
A great set of tools that run on Linux demonstrates how fantastic Linux is.No, a great set of tools that doesn't come with Windows demonstrates how rubbish Windows is.
A great set of tools that Linux comes with demonstrates how fantastic Linux is.I don't blame you for not understanding this - after all, it's only the title of his post, and you only quoted it once.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078012</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing hidden about them...</title>
	<author>EXrider</author>
	<datestamp>1265710500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Filemon and Regmon are also incredibly useful for finding out what <b>poorly coded</b> software packages (such as MS's own GP 9) with permissions issues are trying to do to files and registry.  I've used them on several occasions to put together post-install scripts to change permissions, allowing programs to at least run under a regular user account w/out admin privileges.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Filemon and Regmon are also incredibly useful for finding out what poorly coded software packages ( such as MS 's own GP 9 ) with permissions issues are trying to do to files and registry .
I 've used them on several occasions to put together post-install scripts to change permissions , allowing programs to at least run under a regular user account w/out admin privileges .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Filemon and Regmon are also incredibly useful for finding out what poorly coded software packages (such as MS's own GP 9) with permissions issues are trying to do to files and registry.
I've used them on several occasions to put together post-install scripts to change permissions, allowing programs to at least run under a regular user account w/out admin privileges.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077154</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076788</id>
	<title>Best Buy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265748780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I bet Best Buy could sure use these</htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet Best Buy could sure use these</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet Best Buy could sure use these</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077460</id>
	<title>Re:It's all stuff that ships with Linux</title>
	<author>Machtyn</author>
	<datestamp>1265708220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agreed with you right up until you stated sysinternals isn't one of Windows advantages.  Just because it is bringing similar *nix functionality to Windows doesn't make it disadvantageous.  I would argue that without sysinternals, Windows would be bunk compared to *nix systems (from a administrative and/or development standpoint.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agreed with you right up until you stated sysinternals is n't one of Windows advantages .
Just because it is bringing similar * nix functionality to Windows does n't make it disadvantageous .
I would argue that without sysinternals , Windows would be bunk compared to * nix systems ( from a administrative and/or development standpoint .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agreed with you right up until you stated sysinternals isn't one of Windows advantages.
Just because it is bringing similar *nix functionality to Windows doesn't make it disadvantageous.
I would argue that without sysinternals, Windows would be bunk compared to *nix systems (from a administrative and/or development standpoint.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077936</id>
	<title>Moderately cool in the 1980s</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265710260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There was a time when this kind of thing was neato, but nowdays don't you pretty much take it for granted that your OS comes with this kind of stuff (or is one apt-get command away) and that the actual internals can be discovered by reading the source instead of REing?  Seriously, the very idea that people are impressed by this, is <em>so</em> 20 years ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There was a time when this kind of thing was neato , but nowdays do n't you pretty much take it for granted that your OS comes with this kind of stuff ( or is one apt-get command away ) and that the actual internals can be discovered by reading the source instead of REing ?
Seriously , the very idea that people are impressed by this , is so 20 years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was a time when this kind of thing was neato, but nowdays don't you pretty much take it for granted that your OS comes with this kind of stuff (or is one apt-get command away) and that the actual internals can be discovered by reading the source instead of REing?
Seriously, the very idea that people are impressed by this, is so 20 years ago.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077706</id>
	<title>Re:Best Buy</title>
	<author>zero0ne</author>
	<datestamp>1265709180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I understand the joke... but lets be serious here, I would be surprised if even 5\% of their staff understands how to use these tools correctly.</p><p>When they first started GeekSquad in my area, I was there for a total of 3 months (~15/hr was a good chunk of cash for a college student).</p><p>I saw:</p><p>- people returning towers that ended up having the actual folder we used to document our steps INSIDE the case (surprised the thing didnt overheat)</p><p>- employees trying to remove a power supply without properly unscrewing and detaching the cables from the mobo.</p><p>- managers press their staff to push the ~$70 backup "deal" onto customers (4.7GB of backup no less)</p><p>- a virus on a PC that looked like it filled up the entire hard drive with empty avi files that had a random porn like name given to em.</p><p>- much more I cant recall right now (I've tried to delete it from my memory)</p><p>I stopped showing up shortly after.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I understand the joke... but lets be serious here , I would be surprised if even 5 \ % of their staff understands how to use these tools correctly.When they first started GeekSquad in my area , I was there for a total of 3 months ( ~ 15/hr was a good chunk of cash for a college student ) .I saw : - people returning towers that ended up having the actual folder we used to document our steps INSIDE the case ( surprised the thing didnt overheat ) - employees trying to remove a power supply without properly unscrewing and detaching the cables from the mobo.- managers press their staff to push the ~ $ 70 backup " deal " onto customers ( 4.7GB of backup no less ) - a virus on a PC that looked like it filled up the entire hard drive with empty avi files that had a random porn like name given to em.- much more I cant recall right now ( I 've tried to delete it from my memory ) I stopped showing up shortly after .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I understand the joke... but lets be serious here, I would be surprised if even 5\% of their staff understands how to use these tools correctly.When they first started GeekSquad in my area, I was there for a total of 3 months (~15/hr was a good chunk of cash for a college student).I saw:- people returning towers that ended up having the actual folder we used to document our steps INSIDE the case (surprised the thing didnt overheat)- employees trying to remove a power supply without properly unscrewing and detaching the cables from the mobo.- managers press their staff to push the ~$70 backup "deal" onto customers (4.7GB of backup no less)- a virus on a PC that looked like it filled up the entire hard drive with empty avi files that had a random porn like name given to em.- much more I cant recall right now (I've tried to delete it from my memory)I stopped showing up shortly after.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077682</id>
	<title>this is their second attempt</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265709120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>last time they had to shutdown the website and re-licence the tool (http://store.microsoft.com/Help/ISO-Tool) because of GPL violations.
I wounder if they use <a href="http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/" title="sourceforge.net" rel="nofollow">http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/</a> [sourceforge.net] source code this time<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>last time they had to shutdown the website and re-licence the tool ( http : //store.microsoft.com/Help/ISO-Tool ) because of GPL violations .
I wounder if they use http : //unetbootin.sourceforge.net/ [ sourceforge.net ] source code this time ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>last time they had to shutdown the website and re-licence the tool (http://store.microsoft.com/Help/ISO-Tool) because of GPL violations.
I wounder if they use http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/ [sourceforge.net] source code this time ;-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078158</id>
	<title>Re:It's all stuff that ships with Linux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265710980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was unaware that there was an equivalent (in terms of features and ease of use) to Process Explorer or FileMon on linux.  Mind sharing what they are? <br> <br>

Keep in mind that there may be multiple sources for all that info on linux (running strings on binary etc) but the beauty of ProcExp is that it has tons of useful information at a glance-- what services are spawned under a given process, what threads are in use (and their CPU usage), the commandline used to start an image, strings within both the binary and the memory space, and any IO info you could desire... all at your fingertips.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was unaware that there was an equivalent ( in terms of features and ease of use ) to Process Explorer or FileMon on linux .
Mind sharing what they are ?
Keep in mind that there may be multiple sources for all that info on linux ( running strings on binary etc ) but the beauty of ProcExp is that it has tons of useful information at a glance-- what services are spawned under a given process , what threads are in use ( and their CPU usage ) , the commandline used to start an image , strings within both the binary and the memory space , and any IO info you could desire... all at your fingertips .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was unaware that there was an equivalent (in terms of features and ease of use) to Process Explorer or FileMon on linux.
Mind sharing what they are?
Keep in mind that there may be multiple sources for all that info on linux (running strings on binary etc) but the beauty of ProcExp is that it has tons of useful information at a glance-- what services are spawned under a given process, what threads are in use (and their CPU usage), the commandline used to start an image, strings within both the binary and the memory space, and any IO info you could desire... all at your fingertips.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31090250</id>
	<title>Re:</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1265016600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>psexec has saved my ass SO many times it's not even funny.  psexec \almostcrashedserver cmd.exe</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>psexec has saved my ass SO many times it 's not even funny .
psexec \ almostcrashedserver cmd.exe</tokentext>
<sentencetext>psexec has saved my ass SO many times it's not even funny.
psexec \almostcrashedserver cmd.exe</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077152</id>
	<title>Free doesn't imply ineffective (and vice-versa)</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1265706840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>They're free <b>and</b> they're effective</p></div>
</blockquote><p>There, fixed that for you. Saying "free but effective" suggests that free implies ineffective.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're free and they 're effective There , fixed that for you .
Saying " free but effective " suggests that free implies ineffective .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're free and they're effective
There, fixed that for you.
Saying "free but effective" suggests that free implies ineffective.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076816</id>
	<title>THIS is why I love Windows!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265748900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is nothing like these tools for any other platform on the market.  Mark Russinovich is THE MAN!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is nothing like these tools for any other platform on the market .
Mark Russinovich is THE MAN !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is nothing like these tools for any other platform on the market.
Mark Russinovich is THE MAN!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082836</id>
	<title>I use sysinternals for every win box I get</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265056620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1) Process Explorer - gives you overview of all processes etc etc<br>2) TCPView - shows real-time network connections</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) Process Explorer - gives you overview of all processes etc etc2 ) TCPView - shows real-time network connections</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) Process Explorer - gives you overview of all processes etc etc2) TCPView - shows real-time network connections</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31085750</id>
	<title>Re:Performance Monitor</title>
	<author>StuartHankins</author>
	<datestamp>1265040000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>KSysGuard and SystemTap do the majority of what you say you need.</htmltext>
<tokenext>KSysGuard and SystemTap do the majority of what you say you need .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>KSysGuard and SystemTap do the majority of what you say you need.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31088188</id>
	<title>Re:Wonderful tools???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265050680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Before sysinternals was acquired by Microsoft the site provided the source code for these tools and useful documentation on Windows internals.</p><p>The remaining tools in themselves have almost no value.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Before sysinternals was acquired by Microsoft the site provided the source code for these tools and useful documentation on Windows internals.The remaining tools in themselves have almost no value .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Before sysinternals was acquired by Microsoft the site provided the source code for these tools and useful documentation on Windows internals.The remaining tools in themselves have almost no value.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077872</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265709900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>There's a reason MS bought the company and hired Mark, he consistently puts out the most useful tools for in the trenches Windows diagnostics. </i></p><p>He is also one of the few people who understands how windows actually works!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a reason MS bought the company and hired Mark , he consistently puts out the most useful tools for in the trenches Windows diagnostics .
He is also one of the few people who understands how windows actually works !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a reason MS bought the company and hired Mark, he consistently puts out the most useful tools for in the trenches Windows diagnostics.
He is also one of the few people who understands how windows actually works!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31080094</id>
	<title>Re:free BUT effective</title>
	<author>formfeed</author>
	<datestamp>1265719800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>They're free, but they're effective</p></div> </blockquote><p>
The logic of a true MS follower <br>
-or of someone who had been held captive in a Redmond basement for years, <br>
forced to watch MS propaganda while evil Steve tormented him with a chair.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're free , but they 're effective The logic of a true MS follower -or of someone who had been held captive in a Redmond basement for years , forced to watch MS propaganda while evil Steve tormented him with a chair .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're free, but they're effective 
The logic of a true MS follower 
-or of someone who had been held captive in a Redmond basement for years, 
forced to watch MS propaganda while evil Steve tormented him with a chair.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082684</id>
	<title>Re:"Access Denied"</title>
	<author>snowgirl</author>
	<datestamp>1265054400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Process Explorer kicks the crap out of Task Manager simply for the fact that it doesn't give access denied error messages to admins trying to end protected system processes.  Try ending the same processes with Process Explorer and it "just works" -- which goes to show that the Task Manager error message has nothing to do with actual account privileges.  The first time I found this I realized it's no wonder Windows has such a problem with malware, the applications I run have more access to my system processes than I do!</p></div><p>There is an error message reported with Server 2003 when attempting to install the MUI pack onto Server 2003 x64 German, saying that the architecture is wrong, or something like that.  The reason why it is reporting this message is because the installer grouped two return codes into the same function: it checked the architecture, and then it also checked the language.  Even though the architecture matches, the language (MUI can only be installed on English versions) mismatches, and thus it reports the error.</p><p>The error used to say, "the architecture and/or language may be wrong", but when Server 2003 SP1 shipped, x64 only had English and Japanese, meaning that the "language" error was highly unlikely, so they dumped that part of the message.</p><p>Eventually, I had to come back with the answer, "it's wrong, it's a bug, and there's nothing we can do to fix it, because the bug is in the software that has already shipped, and short of patching it on-the-fly, there's no way we can maim SP2 to make the error message turn up correctly anymore."</p><p>There are a lot of reasons for error messages to be thrown up, and sometimes developers don't get picky and just throw up the most convenient one.  Most likely, Task Manager knows that killing the appropriate process is a bad idea, and MSFT has taken the choice to not hand you enough rope to hang yourself.  I certainly know that sending a SEGV signal to init is a bad idea in *nix, even if certain flavors will let you do it or not.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Process Explorer kicks the crap out of Task Manager simply for the fact that it does n't give access denied error messages to admins trying to end protected system processes .
Try ending the same processes with Process Explorer and it " just works " -- which goes to show that the Task Manager error message has nothing to do with actual account privileges .
The first time I found this I realized it 's no wonder Windows has such a problem with malware , the applications I run have more access to my system processes than I do ! There is an error message reported with Server 2003 when attempting to install the MUI pack onto Server 2003 x64 German , saying that the architecture is wrong , or something like that .
The reason why it is reporting this message is because the installer grouped two return codes into the same function : it checked the architecture , and then it also checked the language .
Even though the architecture matches , the language ( MUI can only be installed on English versions ) mismatches , and thus it reports the error.The error used to say , " the architecture and/or language may be wrong " , but when Server 2003 SP1 shipped , x64 only had English and Japanese , meaning that the " language " error was highly unlikely , so they dumped that part of the message.Eventually , I had to come back with the answer , " it 's wrong , it 's a bug , and there 's nothing we can do to fix it , because the bug is in the software that has already shipped , and short of patching it on-the-fly , there 's no way we can maim SP2 to make the error message turn up correctly anymore .
" There are a lot of reasons for error messages to be thrown up , and sometimes developers do n't get picky and just throw up the most convenient one .
Most likely , Task Manager knows that killing the appropriate process is a bad idea , and MSFT has taken the choice to not hand you enough rope to hang yourself .
I certainly know that sending a SEGV signal to init is a bad idea in * nix , even if certain flavors will let you do it or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Process Explorer kicks the crap out of Task Manager simply for the fact that it doesn't give access denied error messages to admins trying to end protected system processes.
Try ending the same processes with Process Explorer and it "just works" -- which goes to show that the Task Manager error message has nothing to do with actual account privileges.
The first time I found this I realized it's no wonder Windows has such a problem with malware, the applications I run have more access to my system processes than I do!There is an error message reported with Server 2003 when attempting to install the MUI pack onto Server 2003 x64 German, saying that the architecture is wrong, or something like that.
The reason why it is reporting this message is because the installer grouped two return codes into the same function: it checked the architecture, and then it also checked the language.
Even though the architecture matches, the language (MUI can only be installed on English versions) mismatches, and thus it reports the error.The error used to say, "the architecture and/or language may be wrong", but when Server 2003 SP1 shipped, x64 only had English and Japanese, meaning that the "language" error was highly unlikely, so they dumped that part of the message.Eventually, I had to come back with the answer, "it's wrong, it's a bug, and there's nothing we can do to fix it, because the bug is in the software that has already shipped, and short of patching it on-the-fly, there's no way we can maim SP2 to make the error message turn up correctly anymore.
"There are a lot of reasons for error messages to be thrown up, and sometimes developers don't get picky and just throw up the most convenient one.
Most likely, Task Manager knows that killing the appropriate process is a bad idea, and MSFT has taken the choice to not hand you enough rope to hang yourself.
I certainly know that sending a SEGV signal to init is a bad idea in *nix, even if certain flavors will let you do it or not.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077092</id>
	<title>wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265706600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They're free, but they're effective.</p></div><p>Trolling really is a art.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're free , but they 're effective.Trolling really is a art .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're free, but they're effective.Trolling really is a art.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31085344</id>
	<title>Re:It's all stuff that ships with Linux</title>
	<author>StuartHankins</author>
	<datestamp>1265038260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shhh... you'll 'splode their minds. Let them sit happily in their Windows world, blissfully unaware of larger, more stable and secure systems and how they work. You can buy a Windows monkey for 1/3 the price of a decent 'NIX admin, and this is in part why.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Shhh... you 'll 'splode their minds .
Let them sit happily in their Windows world , blissfully unaware of larger , more stable and secure systems and how they work .
You can buy a Windows monkey for 1/3 the price of a decent 'NIX admin , and this is in part why .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shhh... you'll 'splode their minds.
Let them sit happily in their Windows world, blissfully unaware of larger, more stable and secure systems and how they work.
You can buy a Windows monkey for 1/3 the price of a decent 'NIX admin, and this is in part why.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082032</id>
	<title>Re:Wonderful tools</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265736720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"So far, malware is unaware of the ability to suspend a process"
Detecting whether a Windows process has been suspended is trivial.  It can be done by making calls into the kernel.  It could be as simple as monitoring a file the malware is expected to write to every few seconds.  I'd guess that the method you've described would defeat only a small percentage of malware in the wild today.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" So far , malware is unaware of the ability to suspend a process " Detecting whether a Windows process has been suspended is trivial .
It can be done by making calls into the kernel .
It could be as simple as monitoring a file the malware is expected to write to every few seconds .
I 'd guess that the method you 've described would defeat only a small percentage of malware in the wild today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"So far, malware is unaware of the ability to suspend a process"
Detecting whether a Windows process has been suspended is trivial.
It can be done by making calls into the kernel.
It could be as simple as monitoring a file the malware is expected to write to every few seconds.
I'd guess that the method you've described would defeat only a small percentage of malware in the wild today.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077138</id>
	<title>Whatabout Virtualbox?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265706840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now if someone could point out how I boot up my Vista partition from Virtualbox then that would be truly useful. I don't see how any of this proprietary Microsoft stuff helps matters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now if someone could point out how I boot up my Vista partition from Virtualbox then that would be truly useful .
I do n't see how any of this proprietary Microsoft stuff helps matters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now if someone could point out how I boot up my Vista partition from Virtualbox then that would be truly useful.
I don't see how any of this proprietary Microsoft stuff helps matters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077998</id>
	<title>Re:It's all stuff that ships with Linux</title>
	<author>COMON$</author>
	<datestamp>1265710440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well the more irritating thing here is that this is not news.  I am a windows guy, however: <p>1.ESX has been doing P2V on the fly for free for years. </p><p>2. Diskmon has been out so long that I assumed everyone knew about it. </p><p>3. ISO utility?  Seriously? Makes me wonder where all of you were before CD ROM drives,  anyone remember doing upgrades from hard disk after copying the OS down so it would install?  what year was that '95? </p><p>For once I have to side with the Linux snobs...this is OLD news for anyone who has been working with windows for more than a couple years.  If you are a linux user, here is your moment to say..."wow, you weren't able to do that before?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well the more irritating thing here is that this is not news .
I am a windows guy , however : 1.ESX has been doing P2V on the fly for free for years .
2. Diskmon has been out so long that I assumed everyone knew about it .
3. ISO utility ?
Seriously ? Makes me wonder where all of you were before CD ROM drives , anyone remember doing upgrades from hard disk after copying the OS down so it would install ?
what year was that '95 ?
For once I have to side with the Linux snobs...this is OLD news for anyone who has been working with windows for more than a couple years .
If you are a linux user , here is your moment to say... " wow , you were n't able to do that before ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well the more irritating thing here is that this is not news.
I am a windows guy, however: 1.ESX has been doing P2V on the fly for free for years.
2. Diskmon has been out so long that I assumed everyone knew about it.
3. ISO utility?
Seriously? Makes me wonder where all of you were before CD ROM drives,  anyone remember doing upgrades from hard disk after copying the OS down so it would install?
what year was that '95?
For once I have to side with the Linux snobs...this is OLD news for anyone who has been working with windows for more than a couple years.
If you are a linux user, here is your moment to say..."wow, you weren't able to do that before?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077078</id>
	<title>Disk2vhd vs SelfImage</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265706540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I used <a href="http://selfimage.excelcia.org/" title="excelcia.org">SelfImage</a> [excelcia.org] recently to <a href="http://linux.die.net/man/1/dd" title="die.net">dd</a> [die.net] a windows 2003 box to an LVM-based virtual machine on <a href="http://www.proxmox.com/pve" title="proxmox.com">Proxmox</a> [proxmox.com], a Debian-based Virtual Machine Server.  Worked a treat.  While I see the benefit of created a Microsoft VHD if you're an MS shop, we're a mix so being able to pump a live physical disk into a remote logical volume was great.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I used SelfImage [ excelcia.org ] recently to dd [ die.net ] a windows 2003 box to an LVM-based virtual machine on Proxmox [ proxmox.com ] , a Debian-based Virtual Machine Server .
Worked a treat .
While I see the benefit of created a Microsoft VHD if you 're an MS shop , we 're a mix so being able to pump a live physical disk into a remote logical volume was great .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used SelfImage [excelcia.org] recently to dd [die.net] a windows 2003 box to an LVM-based virtual machine on Proxmox [proxmox.com], a Debian-based Virtual Machine Server.
Worked a treat.
While I see the benefit of created a Microsoft VHD if you're an MS shop, we're a mix so being able to pump a live physical disk into a remote logical volume was great.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076866</id>
	<title>Newsid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265749080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am just pissed Newsid doesn't work on Vista and 64-bit OSes anymore. I know it(SID) shouldn't matter but it can an sometimes does in some instances.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am just pissed Newsid does n't work on Vista and 64-bit OSes anymore .
I know it ( SID ) should n't matter but it can an sometimes does in some instances .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am just pissed Newsid doesn't work on Vista and 64-bit OSes anymore.
I know it(SID) shouldn't matter but it can an sometimes does in some instances.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078524</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>RAMMS+EIN</author>
	<datestamp>1265712300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>``And the very first thing they did, within mere days of the acquisition, is they took his ultra-efficient, elegant little tools and put a 200KB EULA popup into every one of them.''</p><p>A fine example of how proprietary software is so much more user-friendly than open-source software.</p><p>``A GUI popup.</p><p>Even into the command line tools.''</p><p>That, of course, is to make them more user-friendly. Everybody knows the command-line is just for Unix hippies who still live in the 1970s.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>` ` And the very first thing they did , within mere days of the acquisition , is they took his ultra-efficient , elegant little tools and put a 200KB EULA popup into every one of them .
''A fine example of how proprietary software is so much more user-friendly than open-source software. ` ` A GUI popup.Even into the command line tools .
''That , of course , is to make them more user-friendly .
Everybody knows the command-line is just for Unix hippies who still live in the 1970s .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>``And the very first thing they did, within mere days of the acquisition, is they took his ultra-efficient, elegant little tools and put a 200KB EULA popup into every one of them.
''A fine example of how proprietary software is so much more user-friendly than open-source software.``A GUI popup.Even into the command line tools.
''That, of course, is to make them more user-friendly.
Everybody knows the command-line is just for Unix hippies who still live in the 1970s.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078638</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>riffer</author>
	<datestamp>1265712840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, me too. I was horrified.

In fact, as soon as I read that Mark was going to the dark side, I did a full rip of the entire SysInternals website, just to make sure I'd have an untainted copy of all his wonderful, useful Windows tools. I was very glad I did that when I saw Microsoft freaking <b>triple</b> the size of some of the binaries...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , me too .
I was horrified .
In fact , as soon as I read that Mark was going to the dark side , I did a full rip of the entire SysInternals website , just to make sure I 'd have an untainted copy of all his wonderful , useful Windows tools .
I was very glad I did that when I saw Microsoft freaking triple the size of some of the binaries.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, me too.
I was horrified.
In fact, as soon as I read that Mark was going to the dark side, I did a full rip of the entire SysInternals website, just to make sure I'd have an untainted copy of all his wonderful, useful Windows tools.
I was very glad I did that when I saw Microsoft freaking triple the size of some of the binaries...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31084750</id>
	<title>Re:First?</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1265035140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The fact that taskmanager these days is so easy to replace or rootkit, and hide what is really going on, I wonder if it really would be better to ship these instead, it would give possibly some more obstacles for a virus to take over your computer....if the code was well written, I believe that taskmanager is so easy to spike because it has a lot of holes...<br>just my 2 cents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The fact that taskmanager these days is so easy to replace or rootkit , and hide what is really going on , I wonder if it really would be better to ship these instead , it would give possibly some more obstacles for a virus to take over your computer....if the code was well written , I believe that taskmanager is so easy to spike because it has a lot of holes...just my 2 cents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fact that taskmanager these days is so easy to replace or rootkit, and hide what is really going on, I wonder if it really would be better to ship these instead, it would give possibly some more obstacles for a virus to take over your computer....if the code was well written, I believe that taskmanager is so easy to spike because it has a lot of holes...just my 2 cents.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078318</id>
	<title>Re:It's Sysinternals, slashdotters</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265711580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great....Now you just started the slashdot effect on the site....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great....Now you just started the slashdot effect on the site... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great....Now you just started the slashdot effect on the site....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077776</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>EvanED</author>
	<datestamp>1265709540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Heck MS's PSS would routinely have you use his tools even before the purchase because nothing they put out internally was nearly as useful.</i></p><p>Around the time MS hired Russinovich a lot of people on Slashdot were worried that it would mean the death of Sysinternals's tools, but what you say is why that argument was almost ridiculous: there'd have been open revolt <i>within</i> MS if that went down.</p><p>(I suppose they could have kept the tools internal to MS, but that didn't seem likely.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heck MS 's PSS would routinely have you use his tools even before the purchase because nothing they put out internally was nearly as useful.Around the time MS hired Russinovich a lot of people on Slashdot were worried that it would mean the death of Sysinternals 's tools , but what you say is why that argument was almost ridiculous : there 'd have been open revolt within MS if that went down .
( I suppose they could have kept the tools internal to MS , but that did n't seem likely .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heck MS's PSS would routinely have you use his tools even before the purchase because nothing they put out internally was nearly as useful.Around the time MS hired Russinovich a lot of people on Slashdot were worried that it would mean the death of Sysinternals's tools, but what you say is why that argument was almost ridiculous: there'd have been open revolt within MS if that went down.
(I suppose they could have kept the tools internal to MS, but that didn't seem likely.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077716</id>
	<title>Re:free BUT effective</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1265709240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>They're free, but they're effective.<br>What an unusual combination of attributes!<br></i><br>Air and sunshine are free, and they're pretty effective, too. What is it with people that they equate "free" with "worthless?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're free , but they 're effective.What an unusual combination of attributes ! Air and sunshine are free , and they 're pretty effective , too .
What is it with people that they equate " free " with " worthless ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're free, but they're effective.What an unusual combination of attributes!Air and sunshine are free, and they're pretty effective, too.
What is it with people that they equate "free" with "worthless?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078790</id>
	<title>Re:Wonderful tools</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265713380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've never suspended a process, but damn, that sounds like a pretty useful approach.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've never suspended a process , but damn , that sounds like a pretty useful approach .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've never suspended a process, but damn, that sounds like a pretty useful approach.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077480</id>
	<title>Re:Among them are a tool for creating virtual hard</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265708280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>SUBST is not the same thing. It just lets you assign a drive letter to a path. SUBST was great years ago when you had only one floppy drive and needed to copy a disk. Using SUBST to create an virtual drive, you could copy a floppy to the virtual driver and DOS would pause in between, letting you swap disks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>SUBST is not the same thing .
It just lets you assign a drive letter to a path .
SUBST was great years ago when you had only one floppy drive and needed to copy a disk .
Using SUBST to create an virtual drive , you could copy a floppy to the virtual driver and DOS would pause in between , letting you swap disks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SUBST is not the same thing.
It just lets you assign a drive letter to a path.
SUBST was great years ago when you had only one floppy drive and needed to copy a disk.
Using SUBST to create an virtual drive, you could copy a floppy to the virtual driver and DOS would pause in between, letting you swap disks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077106</id>
	<title>Is time for multidesktop for windows?</title>
	<author>Tei</author>
	<datestamp>1265706660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of the reasons I can't use Windows for real work is because of the lack of multidesktop. For me is very important the ability to switch from one desktop to other, never having the screen of the taskbar cluttered, having my "graphic things" open in a desktop, and my "programming things" in other.  I can't understand how people can work withouth it. Is like browsing withouth tabs, only worse<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p><p>I know that there are a few free and now free tools that try to provide MD to windows, but all falls flat. The guy behind sysinternals tried to, and was almost a success, but nope. It seems theres some architecture limit that stop this thing to work smoothly on windows, but that is just natural on the X system.</p><p>This and the horrible console that Windows have, makes working with windows infuriating.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the reasons I ca n't use Windows for real work is because of the lack of multidesktop .
For me is very important the ability to switch from one desktop to other , never having the screen of the taskbar cluttered , having my " graphic things " open in a desktop , and my " programming things " in other .
I ca n't understand how people can work withouth it .
Is like browsing withouth tabs , only worse : - ) I know that there are a few free and now free tools that try to provide MD to windows , but all falls flat .
The guy behind sysinternals tried to , and was almost a success , but nope .
It seems theres some architecture limit that stop this thing to work smoothly on windows , but that is just natural on the X system.This and the horrible console that Windows have , makes working with windows infuriating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the reasons I can't use Windows for real work is because of the lack of multidesktop.
For me is very important the ability to switch from one desktop to other, never having the screen of the taskbar cluttered, having my "graphic things" open in a desktop, and my "programming things" in other.
I can't understand how people can work withouth it.
Is like browsing withouth tabs, only worse :-)I know that there are a few free and now free tools that try to provide MD to windows, but all falls flat.
The guy behind sysinternals tried to, and was almost a success, but nope.
It seems theres some architecture limit that stop this thing to work smoothly on windows, but that is just natural on the X system.This and the horrible console that Windows have, makes working with windows infuriating.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077036</id>
	<title>Re:It's all stuff that ships with Linux</title>
	<author>heffrey</author>
	<datestamp>1265706420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me see if I've got this straight.  A great set of tools that run on Windows demonstrates how rubbish Windows is.  A great set of tools that run on Linux demonstrates how fantastic Linux is.</p><p>This sounds a bit like Raymond Chen's post today: <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2010/02/09/9960102.aspx" title="msdn.com" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2010/02/09/9960102.aspx</a> [msdn.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me see if I 've got this straight .
A great set of tools that run on Windows demonstrates how rubbish Windows is .
A great set of tools that run on Linux demonstrates how fantastic Linux is.This sounds a bit like Raymond Chen 's post today : http : //blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2010/02/09/9960102.aspx [ msdn.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me see if I've got this straight.
A great set of tools that run on Windows demonstrates how rubbish Windows is.
A great set of tools that run on Linux demonstrates how fantastic Linux is.This sounds a bit like Raymond Chen's post today: http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2010/02/09/9960102.aspx [msdn.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076812</id>
	<title>It's Sysinternals, slashdotters</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265748900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to be confused with the Sisinternals porn website.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to be confused with the Sisinternals porn website .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to be confused with the Sisinternals porn website.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077172</id>
	<title>For speedy access</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265706960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't forget <a href="http://live.sysinternals.com/" title="sysinternals.com">live.sysinternals.com</a> [sysinternals.com] for instant access to any of the tools.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget live.sysinternals.com [ sysinternals.com ] for instant access to any of the tools .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget live.sysinternals.com [sysinternals.com] for instant access to any of the tools.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31083446</id>
	<title>not so hidden...</title>
	<author>bostei2008</author>
	<datestamp>1265020260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they have been around for a long long time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they have been around for a long long time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they have been around for a long long time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079148</id>
	<title>Re:Putting ISO's onto a usb stick and making boota</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265715060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean like "fdisk E:<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/mbr" Much more trouble than installing a program.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean like " fdisk E : /mbr " Much more trouble than installing a program .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean like "fdisk E: /mbr" Much more trouble than installing a program.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076862</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077576</id>
	<title>Flamebait?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265708700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whatever MS shill modded the above "flamebait" should have his moderation priveleges revoked. How is a politely worded, informative and truthful comment "flamebait"?</p><p>WTF???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whatever MS shill modded the above " flamebait " should have his moderation priveleges revoked .
How is a politely worded , informative and truthful comment " flamebait " ? WTF ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whatever MS shill modded the above "flamebait" should have his moderation priveleges revoked.
How is a politely worded, informative and truthful comment "flamebait"?WTF??
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31081422</id>
	<title>Another noise article...</title>
	<author>thePowerOfGrayskull</author>
	<datestamp>1265729340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why is it we have so many articles that are just pass-through sites (if we're lucky) to the actual thing they're talking about?  Is that what "journalism" has become -- regurgitating single-source information from other places?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is it we have so many articles that are just pass-through sites ( if we 're lucky ) to the actual thing they 're talking about ?
Is that what " journalism " has become -- regurgitating single-source information from other places ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is it we have so many articles that are just pass-through sites (if we're lucky) to the actual thing they're talking about?
Is that what "journalism" has become -- regurgitating single-source information from other places?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31081190</id>
	<title>Spam</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265727420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This isn't about Mark. It's promotion for an author at a website. Nothing new here - move on. And stop publishing spam links.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't about Mark .
It 's promotion for an author at a website .
Nothing new here - move on .
And stop publishing spam links .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't about Mark.
It's promotion for an author at a website.
Nothing new here - move on.
And stop publishing spam links.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31081778</id>
	<title>Free, BUT effective?</title>
	<author>wolf1oo</author>
	<datestamp>1265733000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>-They're free, but they're effective.</p><p>I wonder what on earth the original writer meant by that? Apparently this world believes free software is bad. Ugh<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(<br>Tools such as these and many more have existed inherently in Unix and especially GNU/Linux based systems for at least twenty years now. And, not that I have tried the software released by MS, but I'm willing to bet the open source software is more malleable, capable, and provides much more functionality.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>-They 're free , but they 're effective.I wonder what on earth the original writer meant by that ?
Apparently this world believes free software is bad .
Ugh : ( Tools such as these and many more have existed inherently in Unix and especially GNU/Linux based systems for at least twenty years now .
And , not that I have tried the software released by MS , but I 'm willing to bet the open source software is more malleable , capable , and provides much more functionality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>-They're free, but they're effective.I wonder what on earth the original writer meant by that?
Apparently this world believes free software is bad.
Ugh :(Tools such as these and many more have existed inherently in Unix and especially GNU/Linux based systems for at least twenty years now.
And, not that I have tried the software released by MS, but I'm willing to bet the open source software is more malleable, capable, and provides much more functionality.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077758</id>
	<title>Re:windowssucks tag?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265709480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"it's stuff that should have been part of Windows all along."</p><p>Yea... then we can bitch about Windows being bloated.  Their only winning move, is not to play.  How about a nice game of chess?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" it 's stuff that should have been part of Windows all along. " Yea.. .
then we can bitch about Windows being bloated .
Their only winning move , is not to play .
How about a nice game of chess ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"it's stuff that should have been part of Windows all along."Yea...
then we can bitch about Windows being bloated.
Their only winning move, is not to play.
How about a nice game of chess?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31080440</id>
	<title>Re:First?</title>
	<author>Anachragnome</author>
	<datestamp>1265722140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem is a matter of trust.</p><p>Who here actually TRUSTS Microsoft?</p><p>The fact that Process Explorer v10.20 (or older) was from a NON-MS source is why I trusted it.</p><p>Alas, the current incarnations have MS fingers all over their insides and that trust is now gone, as far as I am concerned.</p><p>Process Explorer v10.20, Revo Uninstaller and Unlocker pretty much give the user full control of a Windows XPsp2 machine. And they are all free, as in beer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is a matter of trust.Who here actually TRUSTS Microsoft ? The fact that Process Explorer v10.20 ( or older ) was from a NON-MS source is why I trusted it.Alas , the current incarnations have MS fingers all over their insides and that trust is now gone , as far as I am concerned.Process Explorer v10.20 , Revo Uninstaller and Unlocker pretty much give the user full control of a Windows XPsp2 machine .
And they are all free , as in beer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is a matter of trust.Who here actually TRUSTS Microsoft?The fact that Process Explorer v10.20 (or older) was from a NON-MS source is why I trusted it.Alas, the current incarnations have MS fingers all over their insides and that trust is now gone, as far as I am concerned.Process Explorer v10.20, Revo Uninstaller and Unlocker pretty much give the user full control of a Windows XPsp2 machine.
And they are all free, as in beer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31081990</id>
	<title>srsly pagedefrag</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265736000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>pagedefrag + win = doitnow</p><p>(as many have stated, should be distributed by default)</p><p>image: capacity</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>pagedefrag + win = doitnow ( as many have stated , should be distributed by default ) image : capacity</tokentext>
<sentencetext>pagedefrag + win = doitnow(as many have stated, should be distributed by default)image: capacity</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31086106</id>
	<title>Re:It's all stuff that ships with Linux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265041680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, the fact that Windows only just got a version of dd, a trivial program which the rest of the computing world has had for at least 30 years, demonstrates how lazy and rubbish Microsoft are. The fact that Windows sysadmins think it is "a treasure" just demonstrates how clueless they are. If they think this is a treasure they would shit their pants with glee if they actually tried any other operating system - if they could figure out how to boot it up that is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , the fact that Windows only just got a version of dd , a trivial program which the rest of the computing world has had for at least 30 years , demonstrates how lazy and rubbish Microsoft are .
The fact that Windows sysadmins think it is " a treasure " just demonstrates how clueless they are .
If they think this is a treasure they would shit their pants with glee if they actually tried any other operating system - if they could figure out how to boot it up that is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, the fact that Windows only just got a version of dd, a trivial program which the rest of the computing world has had for at least 30 years, demonstrates how lazy and rubbish Microsoft are.
The fact that Windows sysadmins think it is "a treasure" just demonstrates how clueless they are.
If they think this is a treasure they would shit their pants with glee if they actually tried any other operating system - if they could figure out how to boot it up that is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766</id>
	<title>Duh</title>
	<author>afidel</author>
	<datestamp>1265748660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's a reason MS bought the company and hired Mark, he consistently puts out the most useful tools for in the trenches Windows diagnostics. Heck MS's PSS would routinely have you use his tools even before the purchase because nothing they put out internally was nearly as useful.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a reason MS bought the company and hired Mark , he consistently puts out the most useful tools for in the trenches Windows diagnostics .
Heck MS 's PSS would routinely have you use his tools even before the purchase because nothing they put out internally was nearly as useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a reason MS bought the company and hired Mark, he consistently puts out the most useful tools for in the trenches Windows diagnostics.
Heck MS's PSS would routinely have you use his tools even before the purchase because nothing they put out internally was nearly as useful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076752</id>
	<title>Suspicious...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265748600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Somehow Dominic Michael Salemno was involved in this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Somehow Dominic Michael Salemno was involved in this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somehow Dominic Michael Salemno was involved in this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078090</id>
	<title>Re:First?</title>
	<author>COMON$</author>
	<datestamp>1265710740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good lord have you used vista or 7 yet?  Have you even tried the Resource monitor that is built in? I havent used process mon in years as a sys admin.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good lord have you used vista or 7 yet ?
Have you even tried the Resource monitor that is built in ?
I havent used process mon in years as a sys admin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good lord have you used vista or 7 yet?
Have you even tried the Resource monitor that is built in?
I havent used process mon in years as a sys admin.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31090508</id>
	<title>Re:Wonderful tools</title>
	<author>Sycraft-fu</author>
	<datestamp>1265018100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can guess that but you'd guess wrong. I have yet to find a malware that is aware of this. I'm not saying they couldn't be, I'm saying they aren't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can guess that but you 'd guess wrong .
I have yet to find a malware that is aware of this .
I 'm not saying they could n't be , I 'm saying they are n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can guess that but you'd guess wrong.
I have yet to find a malware that is aware of this.
I'm not saying they couldn't be, I'm saying they aren't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077740</id>
	<title>Multiple ISOs on one flash drive</title>
	<author>richardellisjr</author>
	<datestamp>1265709360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Speaking of booting from an ISO on a flash drive... does anyone know a way to store multiple ISOs files on a flash drive so that you can choose which to boot from?  Would make installing the various OSs I use a lot easier than searching for the correct CD/DVD each time I install.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Speaking of booting from an ISO on a flash drive... does anyone know a way to store multiple ISOs files on a flash drive so that you can choose which to boot from ?
Would make installing the various OSs I use a lot easier than searching for the correct CD/DVD each time I install .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Speaking of booting from an ISO on a flash drive... does anyone know a way to store multiple ISOs files on a flash drive so that you can choose which to boot from?
Would make installing the various OSs I use a lot easier than searching for the correct CD/DVD each time I install.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082450</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>gusevoisadd</author>
	<datestamp>1265741700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://discount-jewelry-rings.blogspot.com/" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://discount-jewelry-rings.blogspot.com/</a> [blogspot.com]
<a href="http://discount-occasion-gifts.blogspot.com/" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://discount-occasion-gifts.blogspot.com/</a> [blogspot.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //discount-jewelry-rings.blogspot.com/ [ blogspot.com ] http : //discount-occasion-gifts.blogspot.com/ [ blogspot.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://discount-jewelry-rings.blogspot.com/ [blogspot.com]
http://discount-occasion-gifts.blogspot.com/ [blogspot.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079178</id>
	<title>Re:First?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265715180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I start using it, because you were able to run a search of the files used by processes. Particularly, when you're trying to move or delete a file and Windows complains that "something is using the file". Since then, it's a must have on any Windows machine I use.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I start using it , because you were able to run a search of the files used by processes .
Particularly , when you 're trying to move or delete a file and Windows complains that " something is using the file " .
Since then , it 's a must have on any Windows machine I use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I start using it, because you were able to run a search of the files used by processes.
Particularly, when you're trying to move or delete a file and Windows complains that "something is using the file".
Since then, it's a must have on any Windows machine I use.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078904</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265713920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"The Hidden Treasures of Sysinternals"</p><p>Why are they hidden? This is the sort of thing that should be documented. </p></div><p>Not sure if you are going for satire or not here, but they are documented, and published on the web easy to find. The only thing that is "hidden" here is the clever journalists sensationalist headline fishing for more clicks.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The Hidden Treasures of Sysinternals " Why are they hidden ?
This is the sort of thing that should be documented .
Not sure if you are going for satire or not here , but they are documented , and published on the web easy to find .
The only thing that is " hidden " here is the clever journalists sensationalist headline fishing for more clicks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The Hidden Treasures of Sysinternals"Why are they hidden?
This is the sort of thing that should be documented.
Not sure if you are going for satire or not here, but they are documented, and published on the web easy to find.
The only thing that is "hidden" here is the clever journalists sensationalist headline fishing for more clicks.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077708</id>
	<title>The only thing I have downloaded from there so far</title>
	<author>FunPika</author>
	<datestamp>1265709240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GF5Ey5NCC2o" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">this</a> [youtube.com] wonderful screensaver. &gt;:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this [ youtube.com ] wonderful screensaver .
&gt; : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this [youtube.com] wonderful screensaver.
&gt;:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077840</id>
	<title>Re:free BUT effective</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265709780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>kind of like herpes<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</htmltext>
<tokenext>kind of like herpes : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>kind of like herpes :(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31083418</id>
	<title>Re:First?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265019780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Process Explorer is awesome, but it lacks one feature that would make amazing - the ability to monitor network traffic per process. I'm not even sure if this is even possible, but it would help with my paranoia when I see my upload bandwidth suddenly jump and BT is not running...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Process Explorer is awesome , but it lacks one feature that would make amazing - the ability to monitor network traffic per process .
I 'm not even sure if this is even possible , but it would help with my paranoia when I see my upload bandwidth suddenly jump and BT is not running.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Process Explorer is awesome, but it lacks one feature that would make amazing - the ability to monitor network traffic per process.
I'm not even sure if this is even possible, but it would help with my paranoia when I see my upload bandwidth suddenly jump and BT is not running...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076862</id>
	<title>Putting ISO's onto a usb stick and making bootable</title>
	<author>gblackwo</author>
	<datestamp>1265749080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is very useful- I was one of the people who stuck the Windows 7 MSDNAA downloaded iso onto a flash drive in order to install it to my desktop and laptop.<br> <br>

The more difficult part for normal users is not extracting the iso to the drive but making the drive bootable- which unless you have a utility (Like the one in the article)- requires some command line work.

This would make the process way quicker.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is very useful- I was one of the people who stuck the Windows 7 MSDNAA downloaded iso onto a flash drive in order to install it to my desktop and laptop .
The more difficult part for normal users is not extracting the iso to the drive but making the drive bootable- which unless you have a utility ( Like the one in the article ) - requires some command line work .
This would make the process way quicker .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is very useful- I was one of the people who stuck the Windows 7 MSDNAA downloaded iso onto a flash drive in order to install it to my desktop and laptop.
The more difficult part for normal users is not extracting the iso to the drive but making the drive bootable- which unless you have a utility (Like the one in the article)- requires some command line work.
This would make the process way quicker.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077948</id>
	<title>Re:It's all stuff that ships with Linux</title>
	<author>10101001 10101001</author>
	<datestamp>1265710260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Let me see if I've got this straight. A great set of tools that run on Windows demonstrates how rubbish Windows is. A great set of tools that run on Linux demonstrates how fantastic Linux is.</p></div></blockquote><p>Yep.  As pointed out by the GP, the Sysinternal Windows tools are a by-product of reverse engineering.  Specifically, they seem to heavily rely upon the Windows Native API (NTAPI) since the Windows 32 subsytem (Win32) wouldn't readily or at all allow them to do what they do.  Since the NTAPI is rather undocumented, it was an impressive feat for the utilities to be created.</p><p>However, the fact that an impressive feat was even necessary to obtain Linux-like* parity is the fundamental problem.  Doing the same things in Linux are trivial in comparison in most instances because the Linux kernel exposes the information quite freely to user space; and it's generally well documented, so it doesn't even require the semi-heroic effort of understanding the Linux kernel's source code to find out how to use that information or where it is.</p><p>Sysinternals is in many ways a good example of fighting against the system because the system is incomplete.  Certainly, there are instances were Linux falls into this problem as well as Windows (most of the video subsystem being outside the kernel for most video cards, for example).  And even though the source code is available, that obviously doesn't mean that fixing the problem is a simple matter because even if you create a solution, it doesn't mean others will adopt it and absolve you of a good deal of the upkeep.  But, in the end, the heroic struggles (and the melodrama) just doesn't exist when the source is available (or even if there's enough documentation and enough functionality exposed to compensate for where the core system lacks).  So, that does tend to ruin the "wow" factor when it comes to anyone announcing software for your platform, since unless the software is a new app of an area you're interested in (which on the whole is uncommon), there aren't any effective OS patches to be created that will likely effect you.</p><p>*Really, any open source OS would do, but I don't know enough about any others to speak about how they function when it comes to kernel/user space things.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me see if I 've got this straight .
A great set of tools that run on Windows demonstrates how rubbish Windows is .
A great set of tools that run on Linux demonstrates how fantastic Linux is.Yep .
As pointed out by the GP , the Sysinternal Windows tools are a by-product of reverse engineering .
Specifically , they seem to heavily rely upon the Windows Native API ( NTAPI ) since the Windows 32 subsytem ( Win32 ) would n't readily or at all allow them to do what they do .
Since the NTAPI is rather undocumented , it was an impressive feat for the utilities to be created.However , the fact that an impressive feat was even necessary to obtain Linux-like * parity is the fundamental problem .
Doing the same things in Linux are trivial in comparison in most instances because the Linux kernel exposes the information quite freely to user space ; and it 's generally well documented , so it does n't even require the semi-heroic effort of understanding the Linux kernel 's source code to find out how to use that information or where it is.Sysinternals is in many ways a good example of fighting against the system because the system is incomplete .
Certainly , there are instances were Linux falls into this problem as well as Windows ( most of the video subsystem being outside the kernel for most video cards , for example ) .
And even though the source code is available , that obviously does n't mean that fixing the problem is a simple matter because even if you create a solution , it does n't mean others will adopt it and absolve you of a good deal of the upkeep .
But , in the end , the heroic struggles ( and the melodrama ) just does n't exist when the source is available ( or even if there 's enough documentation and enough functionality exposed to compensate for where the core system lacks ) .
So , that does tend to ruin the " wow " factor when it comes to anyone announcing software for your platform , since unless the software is a new app of an area you 're interested in ( which on the whole is uncommon ) , there are n't any effective OS patches to be created that will likely effect you .
* Really , any open source OS would do , but I do n't know enough about any others to speak about how they function when it comes to kernel/user space things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me see if I've got this straight.
A great set of tools that run on Windows demonstrates how rubbish Windows is.
A great set of tools that run on Linux demonstrates how fantastic Linux is.Yep.
As pointed out by the GP, the Sysinternal Windows tools are a by-product of reverse engineering.
Specifically, they seem to heavily rely upon the Windows Native API (NTAPI) since the Windows 32 subsytem (Win32) wouldn't readily or at all allow them to do what they do.
Since the NTAPI is rather undocumented, it was an impressive feat for the utilities to be created.However, the fact that an impressive feat was even necessary to obtain Linux-like* parity is the fundamental problem.
Doing the same things in Linux are trivial in comparison in most instances because the Linux kernel exposes the information quite freely to user space; and it's generally well documented, so it doesn't even require the semi-heroic effort of understanding the Linux kernel's source code to find out how to use that information or where it is.Sysinternals is in many ways a good example of fighting against the system because the system is incomplete.
Certainly, there are instances were Linux falls into this problem as well as Windows (most of the video subsystem being outside the kernel for most video cards, for example).
And even though the source code is available, that obviously doesn't mean that fixing the problem is a simple matter because even if you create a solution, it doesn't mean others will adopt it and absolve you of a good deal of the upkeep.
But, in the end, the heroic struggles (and the melodrama) just doesn't exist when the source is available (or even if there's enough documentation and enough functionality exposed to compensate for where the core system lacks).
So, that does tend to ruin the "wow" factor when it comes to anyone announcing software for your platform, since unless the software is a new app of an area you're interested in (which on the whole is uncommon), there aren't any effective OS patches to be created that will likely effect you.
*Really, any open source OS would do, but I don't know enough about any others to speak about how they function when it comes to kernel/user space things.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31091030</id>
	<title>Re:</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1265020200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you read the steps required to get such proof, you might understand why I wouldn't bother.I am not going to reformat to prove a point on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. when some MS monkey will just mod me down anyways.If I remember correctly, the differences were the services listed running under svchost.exe, and more importantly, the differences in reported memory usage by svchost.exe per Process Explorer. They should have been exactly the same, but were not.Why would the exact same list of services running under svchost.exe use d</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you read the steps required to get such proof , you might understand why I would n't bother.I am not going to reformat to prove a point on / .
when some MS monkey will just mod me down anyways.If I remember correctly , the differences were the services listed running under svchost.exe , and more importantly , the differences in reported memory usage by svchost.exe per Process Explorer .
They should have been exactly the same , but were not.Why would the exact same list of services running under svchost.exe use d</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you read the steps required to get such proof, you might understand why I wouldn't bother.I am not going to reformat to prove a point on /.
when some MS monkey will just mod me down anyways.If I remember correctly, the differences were the services listed running under svchost.exe, and more importantly, the differences in reported memory usage by svchost.exe per Process Explorer.
They should have been exactly the same, but were not.Why would the exact same list of services running under svchost.exe use d
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077154</id>
	<title>Nothing hidden about them...</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1265706840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're excellent for a wide range of things. Filemon (now superceded but still available) is an excellent tool for working out what files a piece of software is opening (eg. if you're trying to find config files). Regmon does something similar for the registry. Process explorer is stellar for getting more detail on a process than task manager will ever give (like where the image is running from and what DLLs it's using). Sysinternals filled a gap in diagnostic software. In a Windows environment they're as basic to me as netstat or ping. (speaking of which check out sysinternals tcpview). Especially good for tracing a user mode process right through. There are a lot of other utils to unlock the power of your Windows environment too.</p><p>Two sysinternals that weren't mentioned worth knowing about:</p><p>streams - view or remove hidden file streams attached to a file not normally seen in explorer. Especially good for removing that pesky "downloaded files are bad" warning when something is marked as being from the Internet zone.</p><p>junction - One of a handful of tools that allows you to create junctions (simliar to but not the same as hard directory links) in Windows XP.</p><p>The other non-sys-internals thing that every power user should know about is windbg and the debugging symbols. Indespesible for tracking down the culprit if you get blue screens due to device drivers (though obviously non-developers are not going to be able to do much about fixing the fault apart from downloading a different version or removing the device driver)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're excellent for a wide range of things .
Filemon ( now superceded but still available ) is an excellent tool for working out what files a piece of software is opening ( eg .
if you 're trying to find config files ) .
Regmon does something similar for the registry .
Process explorer is stellar for getting more detail on a process than task manager will ever give ( like where the image is running from and what DLLs it 's using ) .
Sysinternals filled a gap in diagnostic software .
In a Windows environment they 're as basic to me as netstat or ping .
( speaking of which check out sysinternals tcpview ) .
Especially good for tracing a user mode process right through .
There are a lot of other utils to unlock the power of your Windows environment too.Two sysinternals that were n't mentioned worth knowing about : streams - view or remove hidden file streams attached to a file not normally seen in explorer .
Especially good for removing that pesky " downloaded files are bad " warning when something is marked as being from the Internet zone.junction - One of a handful of tools that allows you to create junctions ( simliar to but not the same as hard directory links ) in Windows XP.The other non-sys-internals thing that every power user should know about is windbg and the debugging symbols .
Indespesible for tracking down the culprit if you get blue screens due to device drivers ( though obviously non-developers are not going to be able to do much about fixing the fault apart from downloading a different version or removing the device driver )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're excellent for a wide range of things.
Filemon (now superceded but still available) is an excellent tool for working out what files a piece of software is opening (eg.
if you're trying to find config files).
Regmon does something similar for the registry.
Process explorer is stellar for getting more detail on a process than task manager will ever give (like where the image is running from and what DLLs it's using).
Sysinternals filled a gap in diagnostic software.
In a Windows environment they're as basic to me as netstat or ping.
(speaking of which check out sysinternals tcpview).
Especially good for tracing a user mode process right through.
There are a lot of other utils to unlock the power of your Windows environment too.Two sysinternals that weren't mentioned worth knowing about:streams - view or remove hidden file streams attached to a file not normally seen in explorer.
Especially good for removing that pesky "downloaded files are bad" warning when something is marked as being from the Internet zone.junction - One of a handful of tools that allows you to create junctions (simliar to but not the same as hard directory links) in Windows XP.The other non-sys-internals thing that every power user should know about is windbg and the debugging symbols.
Indespesible for tracking down the culprit if you get blue screens due to device drivers (though obviously non-developers are not going to be able to do much about fixing the fault apart from downloading a different version or removing the device driver)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079434</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>ozmanjusri</author>
	<datestamp>1265716200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Why are they hidden?</i>
<p>
They're not. This whole article is a marketing puff piece.
</p><p>
You'll see similar articles all over the web, like "Win 7 cheat code" etc. Windows 7 adoption is slowing, as its honeymoon period ends and the computer buying public realise, despite the intense hype, it's just not a very interesting product. That's why they're touting the phony 10\% adoption figure now and not showing any true growth curve.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why are they hidden ?
They 're not .
This whole article is a marketing puff piece .
You 'll see similar articles all over the web , like " Win 7 cheat code " etc .
Windows 7 adoption is slowing , as its honeymoon period ends and the computer buying public realise , despite the intense hype , it 's just not a very interesting product .
That 's why they 're touting the phony 10 \ % adoption figure now and not showing any true growth curve .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why are they hidden?
They're not.
This whole article is a marketing puff piece.
You'll see similar articles all over the web, like "Win 7 cheat code" etc.
Windows 7 adoption is slowing, as its honeymoon period ends and the computer buying public realise, despite the intense hype, it's just not a very interesting product.
That's why they're touting the phony 10\% adoption figure now and not showing any true growth curve.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077336</id>
	<title>Those that do not understand UNIX</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265707740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>are condemned to reinvent it.  Poorly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>are condemned to reinvent it .
Poorly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>are condemned to reinvent it.
Poorly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077850</id>
	<title>Re:Putting ISO's onto a usb stick and making boota</title>
	<author>jez9999</author>
	<datestamp>1265709780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wtf is the command line?  I'm on Slashdot, so you can understand how this is new territory for me.  It sounds complicated and scary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wtf is the command line ?
I 'm on Slashdot , so you can understand how this is new territory for me .
It sounds complicated and scary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wtf is the command line?
I'm on Slashdot, so you can understand how this is new territory for me.
It sounds complicated and scary.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076862</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078246</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>The Angry Mick</author>
	<datestamp>1265711280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>How good is Apple documentation?</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>Not very, sadly.
</p><p>I think what's happened is that software manufacturers woke up to the fact that documentation was a pain better reserved for someone else's ass.
</p><p>I'm not sure if things are related (I suspect they are), but it seems to me that once Microsoft started their own publishing house, the quality of "F1" materials tanked severely.  People that got frustrated simply chucked out another $45 for a thick and immediately outdated book, and Microsoft deposited another healthy chunk of change in the bank.  Other companies surely noticed this and followed suit.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How good is Apple documentation ?
Not very , sadly .
I think what 's happened is that software manufacturers woke up to the fact that documentation was a pain better reserved for someone else 's ass .
I 'm not sure if things are related ( I suspect they are ) , but it seems to me that once Microsoft started their own publishing house , the quality of " F1 " materials tanked severely .
People that got frustrated simply chucked out another $ 45 for a thick and immediately outdated book , and Microsoft deposited another healthy chunk of change in the bank .
Other companies surely noticed this and followed suit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> How good is Apple documentation?
Not very, sadly.
I think what's happened is that software manufacturers woke up to the fact that documentation was a pain better reserved for someone else's ass.
I'm not sure if things are related (I suspect they are), but it seems to me that once Microsoft started their own publishing house, the quality of "F1" materials tanked severely.
People that got frustrated simply chucked out another $45 for a thick and immediately outdated book, and Microsoft deposited another healthy chunk of change in the bank.
Other companies surely noticed this and followed suit.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077818</id>
	<title>Re:Performance Monitor</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265709720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Excellent list.  Better than 'top' is 'htop', available on your $FAVORITE\_DISTRO.  It has nifty ASCII charts of CPU/MEM/etc., process tree view, and handy keystrokes for running strace, etc.</p><p>Favorite command is definitely:  dstat -lycmnd 10</p><p>Pretty colors...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Excellent list .
Better than 'top ' is 'htop ' , available on your $ FAVORITE \ _DISTRO .
It has nifty ASCII charts of CPU/MEM/etc. , process tree view , and handy keystrokes for running strace , etc.Favorite command is definitely : dstat -lycmnd 10Pretty colors.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Excellent list.
Better than 'top' is 'htop', available on your $FAVORITE\_DISTRO.
It has nifty ASCII charts of CPU/MEM/etc., process tree view, and handy keystrokes for running strace, etc.Favorite command is definitely:  dstat -lycmnd 10Pretty colors...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31080744</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>jonwil</author>
	<datestamp>1265724060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe if you posted proof (i.e. details of the items being hidden from MS releases of Process Explorer) people might care.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe if you posted proof ( i.e .
details of the items being hidden from MS releases of Process Explorer ) people might care .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe if you posted proof (i.e.
details of the items being hidden from MS releases of Process Explorer) people might care.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076906</id>
	<title>Among them are a tool for creating virtual hard di</title>
	<author>GerardAtJob</author>
	<datestamp>1265706000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Among them are a tool for creating virtual hard disks from physical drives</i>...<br>subst? That's old stuff... but nice for the other tools!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Among them are a tool for creating virtual hard disks from physical drives...subst ?
That 's old stuff... but nice for the other tools !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Among them are a tool for creating virtual hard disks from physical drives...subst?
That's old stuff... but nice for the other tools!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31084738</id>
	<title>For Windows 7 Ultimate Too?</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1265035080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Do you really think the average office worker cares about examining mount points or finding out how many USER handles a process is using? That's why Microsoft doesn't ship any of that with Windows, and they probably never will.</i></p><p>That argument only holds water with Windows 7 Home.  Windows 7 Professional and Windows 7 Ultimate is the mainstream developer platform.</p><p>Linux with all of the tools and Windows with, well, whatever it comes with, occupy about the same size of a DVD.  I would think that Windows 7 Professional or Ultimate should come with all of these sorts of tools, and indeed, but instead, I can burn an ISO with Linux, but not Win7, out of the box.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you really think the average office worker cares about examining mount points or finding out how many USER handles a process is using ?
That 's why Microsoft does n't ship any of that with Windows , and they probably never will.That argument only holds water with Windows 7 Home .
Windows 7 Professional and Windows 7 Ultimate is the mainstream developer platform.Linux with all of the tools and Windows with , well , whatever it comes with , occupy about the same size of a DVD .
I would think that Windows 7 Professional or Ultimate should come with all of these sorts of tools , and indeed , but instead , I can burn an ISO with Linux , but not Win7 , out of the box .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you really think the average office worker cares about examining mount points or finding out how many USER handles a process is using?
That's why Microsoft doesn't ship any of that with Windows, and they probably never will.That argument only holds water with Windows 7 Home.
Windows 7 Professional and Windows 7 Ultimate is the mainstream developer platform.Linux with all of the tools and Windows with, well, whatever it comes with, occupy about the same size of a DVD.
I would think that Windows 7 Professional or Ultimate should come with all of these sorts of tools, and indeed, but instead, I can burn an ISO with Linux, but not Win7, out of the box.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077976</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31083500</id>
	<title>Re:Free doesn't imply ineffective (and vice-versa)</title>
	<author>hk117</author>
	<datestamp>1265021100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Free utilities <b>do</b> tend to be ineffective.<br> Otherwise we'd all be following in the footsteps of Stallman.
<br>
For every <i>Process Explorer</i> and <i>nmap</i> there's the rest of the bell curve.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Free utilities do tend to be ineffective .
Otherwise we 'd all be following in the footsteps of Stallman .
For every Process Explorer and nmap there 's the rest of the bell curve .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Free utilities do tend to be ineffective.
Otherwise we'd all be following in the footsteps of Stallman.
For every Process Explorer and nmap there's the rest of the bell curve.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082524</id>
	<title>Re:It's all stuff that ships with Linux</title>
	<author>slaad</author>
	<datestamp>1265742840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are there any linux utilities that are comparable in depth to process explorer?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are there any linux utilities that are comparable in depth to process explorer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are there any linux utilities that are comparable in depth to process explorer?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078492</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265712180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>there's a flag. "/accepteula"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>there 's a flag .
" /accepteula "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there's a flag.
"/accepteula"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077882</id>
	<title>Re:THIS is why I love Windows!</title>
	<author>TheNinjaroach</author>
	<datestamp>1265709960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Spoken by someone who apparently hasn't used any other platform on the market.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Spoken by someone who apparently has n't used any other platform on the market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spoken by someone who apparently hasn't used any other platform on the market.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076758</id>
	<title>pstools best by far</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265748660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>psexec has saved my ass SO many times it's not even funny.  psexec \\almostcrashedserver cmd.exe</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>psexec has saved my ass SO many times it 's not even funny .
psexec \ \ almostcrashedserver cmd.exe</tokentext>
<sentencetext>psexec has saved my ass SO many times it's not even funny.
psexec \\almostcrashedserver cmd.exe</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077976</id>
	<title>Re:It's all stuff that ships with Linux</title>
	<author>The Bungi</author>
	<datestamp>1265710380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How these tools are used and \% of userbase that cares about them:</p><p><b>Windows:</b><br><tt><br>- &lt;- Developers<br>------------------- &lt;- Everyone else<br></tt></p><p><b>Linux:</b><br><tt><br>------------------- &lt;- Developers<br>- &lt;- Everyone else<br></tt></p><p>Do you really think the average office worker cares about examining mount points or finding out how many USER handles a process is using? That's why Microsoft doesn't ship any of that with Windows, and they probably never will. More importantly, I'd rather have a third party write these kinds of tools. They're not limited by what marketing and support think is a good idea to ship. If Microsoft made them they probably wouldn't be as useful - not to mention everyone would whine about how they're evil because they're killing a niche.</p><p>As long as these tools are available, I could care less where I have to get them from or what I <i>couldn't</i> do before I install them. Duh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How these tools are used and \ % of userbase that cares about them : Windows : - ------------------- Linux : ------------------- - Do you really think the average office worker cares about examining mount points or finding out how many USER handles a process is using ?
That 's why Microsoft does n't ship any of that with Windows , and they probably never will .
More importantly , I 'd rather have a third party write these kinds of tools .
They 're not limited by what marketing and support think is a good idea to ship .
If Microsoft made them they probably would n't be as useful - not to mention everyone would whine about how they 're evil because they 're killing a niche.As long as these tools are available , I could care less where I have to get them from or what I could n't do before I install them .
Duh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How these tools are used and \% of userbase that cares about them:Windows:- ------------------- Linux:------------------- - Do you really think the average office worker cares about examining mount points or finding out how many USER handles a process is using?
That's why Microsoft doesn't ship any of that with Windows, and they probably never will.
More importantly, I'd rather have a third party write these kinds of tools.
They're not limited by what marketing and support think is a good idea to ship.
If Microsoft made them they probably wouldn't be as useful - not to mention everyone would whine about how they're evil because they're killing a niche.As long as these tools are available, I could care less where I have to get them from or what I couldn't do before I install them.
Duh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31084260
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079842
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077776
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31083500
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31088188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31086588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31081170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31090508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31083410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31080744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31083018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076910
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082862
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31080094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31080440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077480
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31084738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31084750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077922
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31081562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31081428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31085750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31080228
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078364
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31083418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31085344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31080088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31084696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31080650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31080760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078246
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31085358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31081012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078090
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1811250_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31086106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077682
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076910
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077036
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31085358
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31086106
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078098
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078202
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31084696
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077948
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31080088
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31085344
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077976
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31084738
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077708
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076758
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31083018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079296
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077882
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31081562
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077152
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31083500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31080228
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31086588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31085750
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077212
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082288
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077740
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077154
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078012
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077706
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079958
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31080744
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082460
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31081170
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31080650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077776
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077800
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078524
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082450
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078638
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082862
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31080760
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31084260
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077432
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078246
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077810
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079404
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078904
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31081428
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077356
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079782
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31083410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31084750
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077442
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31080440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077866
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31083418
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082032
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31090508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31088188
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31080094
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31081012
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076916
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077480
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078146
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31082934
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079148
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077850
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077922
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31076866
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077048
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31079842
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077336
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31078364
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077138
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077742
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1811250.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1811250.31077078
</commentlist>
</conversation>
