<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_08_1751217</id>
	<title>Verizon Blocking 4chan</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1265618940000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"According to 4chan's owner and administrator 'moot,' Verizon has <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5466492/verizon-has-blocked-access-to-4chan-but-what-are-they-gonna-do-about-it">explicitly blocked all traffic on their network from boards.4chan.org</a>, where all of 4chan's boards are located. Moot explains that only traffic to and from port 80 is being dropped and they were able to <a href="http://status.4chan.org/index.html#2310965532000217917">confirm that it was intentional</a>.   4chan's downtime for Verizon users has been in effect for at least 72 hours since Saturday, February 7."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " According to 4chan 's owner and administrator 'moot, ' Verizon has explicitly blocked all traffic on their network from boards.4chan.org , where all of 4chan 's boards are located .
Moot explains that only traffic to and from port 80 is being dropped and they were able to confirm that it was intentional .
4chan 's downtime for Verizon users has been in effect for at least 72 hours since Saturday , February 7 .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "According to 4chan's owner and administrator 'moot,' Verizon has explicitly blocked all traffic on their network from boards.4chan.org, where all of 4chan's boards are located.
Moot explains that only traffic to and from port 80 is being dropped and they were able to confirm that it was intentional.
4chan's downtime for Verizon users has been in effect for at least 72 hours since Saturday, February 7.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066138</id>
	<title>Well...</title>
	<author>SkankinMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1265628000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't access 4chan but I am on the phone with their tech support voicing my displeasure with their filtering of my internet.  Verizon offers parental access controls that should be more than enough.  Unfortunately, their rank and file support guys knows nothing about this and you end up running in circles getting a straight answer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't access 4chan but I am on the phone with their tech support voicing my displeasure with their filtering of my internet .
Verizon offers parental access controls that should be more than enough .
Unfortunately , their rank and file support guys knows nothing about this and you end up running in circles getting a straight answer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't access 4chan but I am on the phone with their tech support voicing my displeasure with their filtering of my internet.
Verizon offers parental access controls that should be more than enough.
Unfortunately, their rank and file support guys knows nothing about this and you end up running in circles getting a straight answer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067010</id>
	<title>Arise...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265632140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh collective consciousness of the Internet, arise</p><p>Towards the Verizon at the horizon</p><p>Strike swift and hard to their surprise</p><p>With DDOS on their ASS</p><p>Show them the reason for the season</p><p>So they may commit no treason.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh collective consciousness of the Internet , ariseTowards the Verizon at the horizonStrike swift and hard to their surpriseWith DDOS on their ASSShow them the reason for the seasonSo they may commit no treason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh collective consciousness of the Internet, ariseTowards the Verizon at the horizonStrike swift and hard to their surpriseWith DDOS on their ASSShow them the reason for the seasonSo they may commit no treason.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065608</id>
	<title>Re:rebellion?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265625840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They are very pro-darwinian</p></div><p>I don't think Darwin ever imagined the "fittest" natural creatures to mean "teenagers who perpetually sit in front of their computers, typing the exact same phrases and posting the same pictures every single day"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are very pro-darwinianI do n't think Darwin ever imagined the " fittest " natural creatures to mean " teenagers who perpetually sit in front of their computers , typing the exact same phrases and posting the same pictures every single day "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are very pro-darwinianI don't think Darwin ever imagined the "fittest" natural creatures to mean "teenagers who perpetually sit in front of their computers, typing the exact same phrases and posting the same pictures every single day"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065114</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265624160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>On hand hand this is malignant censorship, the forebode to a society with no free information. On the other hand, this is 4chan.....</p></div>
</blockquote><p>First they came for 4chan, and I did not speak out -- because I was not a 4chan member...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>On hand hand this is malignant censorship , the forebode to a society with no free information .
On the other hand , this is 4chan.... . First they came for 4chan , and I did not speak out -- because I was not a 4chan member.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On hand hand this is malignant censorship, the forebode to a society with no free information.
On the other hand, this is 4chan.....
First they came for 4chan, and I did not speak out -- because I was not a 4chan member...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065170</id>
	<title>Re:I'm 12</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265624280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wanna come take a ride in my windowless van? It's the one with "Free Candy" written on the side!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wan na come take a ride in my windowless van ?
It 's the one with " Free Candy " written on the side !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wanna come take a ride in my windowless van?
It's the one with "Free Candy" written on the side!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065660</id>
	<title>it's like freudian psychology</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1265626080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>4chan is the mindless id, verizon is the superego of executive function control. the superego attempts to suppress the id. but it will just comes out anyways, in some subconscious way, it always does. you can't kill something 4chan, it's immortal and undead. the mindless id always finds a way</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>4chan is the mindless id , verizon is the superego of executive function control .
the superego attempts to suppress the id .
but it will just comes out anyways , in some subconscious way , it always does .
you ca n't kill something 4chan , it 's immortal and undead .
the mindless id always finds a way</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4chan is the mindless id, verizon is the superego of executive function control.
the superego attempts to suppress the id.
but it will just comes out anyways, in some subconscious way, it always does.
you can't kill something 4chan, it's immortal and undead.
the mindless id always finds a way</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068420</id>
	<title>Re:rebellion?</title>
	<author>theArtificial</author>
	<datestamp>1265646180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lurker here. I feel that his situation is unfortunate however placing the blame on 4chan for his actions is not right. He did something that is illegal and is facing the consequences.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lurker here .
I feel that his situation is unfortunate however placing the blame on 4chan for his actions is not right .
He did something that is illegal and is facing the consequences .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lurker here.
I feel that his situation is unfortunate however placing the blame on 4chan for his actions is not right.
He did something that is illegal and is facing the consequences.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064814</id>
	<title>Build your bunkers people..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265623080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>..te shitstorm is coming.

And as this is 4chan so yes the shit in shitstorm is litteral.</htmltext>
<tokenext>..te shitstorm is coming .
And as this is 4chan so yes the shit in shitstorm is litteral .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..te shitstorm is coming.
And as this is 4chan so yes the shit in shitstorm is litteral.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066822</id>
	<title>Re:Misleading Summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265631120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It should be interesting to see the fallout from this. 4channers aren't exactly the paragon of maturity.</p></div><p>Immature but efficient, it seems to work well for this day and age. I mean, imagine if you could ddos politicians, lobbyists and fast-tracked bills that go through congress, wouldn't you do it?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It should be interesting to see the fallout from this .
4channers are n't exactly the paragon of maturity.Immature but efficient , it seems to work well for this day and age .
I mean , imagine if you could ddos politicians , lobbyists and fast-tracked bills that go through congress , would n't you do it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It should be interesting to see the fallout from this.
4channers aren't exactly the paragon of maturity.Immature but efficient, it seems to work well for this day and age.
I mean, imagine if you could ddos politicians, lobbyists and fast-tracked bills that go through congress, wouldn't you do it?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069008</id>
	<title>Re:Very little</title>
	<author>jack2000</author>
	<datestamp>1265653020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess Verizon would enjoy a huge amount of pizzas and free bibles.<br>
That and threatening phone calls to the CEOs houses. <br>
OH well...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess Verizon would enjoy a huge amount of pizzas and free bibles .
That and threatening phone calls to the CEOs houses .
OH well.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess Verizon would enjoy a huge amount of pizzas and free bibles.
That and threatening phone calls to the CEOs houses.
OH well...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065954</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067890</id>
	<title>4chan is NOT blocked to verizon fios users</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265640060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had no problem getting there. I have never heard of this site before.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had no problem getting there .
I have never heard of this site before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had no problem getting there.
I have never heard of this site before.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065444</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong</title>
	<author>Microlith</author>
	<datestamp>1265625360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As I inquired with another user, check the following:</p><p>- You are on 3G via Verizon and not on a local Wifi AP.<br>- You are going to an actual board and not just poking around the front page.</p><p>Most reports of successful access turn to failure when those two conditions are met.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As I inquired with another user , check the following : - You are on 3G via Verizon and not on a local Wifi AP.- You are going to an actual board and not just poking around the front page.Most reports of successful access turn to failure when those two conditions are met .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I inquired with another user, check the following:- You are on 3G via Verizon and not on a local Wifi AP.- You are going to an actual board and not just poking around the front page.Most reports of successful access turn to failure when those two conditions are met.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067304</id>
	<title>thank you for posting this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265634480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in a couple of months or so i'm finally getting my first phone, thanks to this article there's one less provider i need to look at...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in a couple of months or so i 'm finally getting my first phone , thanks to this article there 's one less provider i need to look at.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in a couple of months or so i'm finally getting my first phone, thanks to this article there's one less provider i need to look at...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065950</id>
	<title>Anonymous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265627220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess I'm stuck posting here then.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess I 'm stuck posting here then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess I'm stuck posting here then.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064900</id>
	<title>Re:I CAN HAZ KITTY PORN?</title>
	<author>e2d2</author>
	<datestamp>1265623320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah no shit. It's like walking through a mine field navigating that site. No thanks. I'll stay here and let pedo-bear handle the censorship issues himself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah no shit .
It 's like walking through a mine field navigating that site .
No thanks .
I 'll stay here and let pedo-bear handle the censorship issues himself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah no shit.
It's like walking through a mine field navigating that site.
No thanks.
I'll stay here and let pedo-bear handle the censorship issues himself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066352</id>
	<title>Re:Shame about Verizon</title>
	<author>PixelScuba</author>
	<datestamp>1265629020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, <a href="http://gawker.com/5462117/scientologists-in-haiti-a-firsthand-account" title="gawker.com">they're making a mess of the humanitarian effort in Haiti.</a> [gawker.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , they 're making a mess of the humanitarian effort in Haiti .
[ gawker.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, they're making a mess of the humanitarian effort in Haiti.
[gawker.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31071748</id>
	<title>Re:DOOMED I say... DOOMED!</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1265729400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><strong>They're not filtering content, they've intentionally broken connectivity to some IP address(es)

Probably due to DoS conditions, spam, or other issues.

ISPs blackhole spammers'  and DoSers prefixes routinely.
Interesting (and ridiculous) that you think, just because the IPs in this case are also used by 4chan, that it means something different.</strong></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're not filtering content , they 've intentionally broken connectivity to some IP address ( es ) Probably due to DoS conditions , spam , or other issues .
ISPs blackhole spammers ' and DoSers prefixes routinely .
Interesting ( and ridiculous ) that you think , just because the IPs in this case are also used by 4chan , that it means something different .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're not filtering content, they've intentionally broken connectivity to some IP address(es)

Probably due to DoS conditions, spam, or other issues.
ISPs blackhole spammers'  and DoSers prefixes routinely.
Interesting (and ridiculous) that you think, just because the IPs in this case are also used by 4chan, that it means something different.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066152</id>
	<title>Serendipity</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1265628060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By coincidence, thousands of parents who use Verizon for their internet access have noticed, for the past several days, that their email downloads and web page visits have inexplicably sped up ten-fold.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By coincidence , thousands of parents who use Verizon for their internet access have noticed , for the past several days , that their email downloads and web page visits have inexplicably sped up ten-fold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By coincidence, thousands of parents who use Verizon for their internet access have noticed, for the past several days, that their email downloads and web page visits have inexplicably sped up ten-fold.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069252</id>
	<title>I call shenanigans on 4chan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265656500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I wanted to make a ton of people go to my website, I would just post a blog somewhere claiming AT&amp;T or Verizon blocked access to it and watch 500k users "test" it from their connection. Not only that: there is a LOT of misinformation and FUD here. What Verizon's statement is saying (http://policyblog.verizon.com/BlogPost/697/ProtectingOurCustomersandOurNetwork.aspx) is that specific IPs were SMS flooding Verizon wireless users. Verizon's wireless business unit blocked the attacking IP addresses to protect their customers until the attacks stopped, just like every single slashdotter and 4chaner wishes their ISP would do for them if they were being attacked. The only difference is the magnitude of Verizon's network makes this decision felt on a wider scale. At the end of the day; though, Verizon is a business, and is legally entitled to protect itself and its customers who help it to generate revenue. They are, by no means, obligated to be a victim of inbound attacks simply because it means you have to miss "Caturday" one time. They didn't say anything about a DDoS attack, or any specific port or protocol being blocked (except for maybe IPv4), nor did they make any attempt at content filtering against anyone who pays for a route through their network.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I wanted to make a ton of people go to my website , I would just post a blog somewhere claiming AT&amp;T or Verizon blocked access to it and watch 500k users " test " it from their connection .
Not only that : there is a LOT of misinformation and FUD here .
What Verizon 's statement is saying ( http : //policyblog.verizon.com/BlogPost/697/ProtectingOurCustomersandOurNetwork.aspx ) is that specific IPs were SMS flooding Verizon wireless users .
Verizon 's wireless business unit blocked the attacking IP addresses to protect their customers until the attacks stopped , just like every single slashdotter and 4chaner wishes their ISP would do for them if they were being attacked .
The only difference is the magnitude of Verizon 's network makes this decision felt on a wider scale .
At the end of the day ; though , Verizon is a business , and is legally entitled to protect itself and its customers who help it to generate revenue .
They are , by no means , obligated to be a victim of inbound attacks simply because it means you have to miss " Caturday " one time .
They did n't say anything about a DDoS attack , or any specific port or protocol being blocked ( except for maybe IPv4 ) , nor did they make any attempt at content filtering against anyone who pays for a route through their network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I wanted to make a ton of people go to my website, I would just post a blog somewhere claiming AT&amp;T or Verizon blocked access to it and watch 500k users "test" it from their connection.
Not only that: there is a LOT of misinformation and FUD here.
What Verizon's statement is saying (http://policyblog.verizon.com/BlogPost/697/ProtectingOurCustomersandOurNetwork.aspx) is that specific IPs were SMS flooding Verizon wireless users.
Verizon's wireless business unit blocked the attacking IP addresses to protect their customers until the attacks stopped, just like every single slashdotter and 4chaner wishes their ISP would do for them if they were being attacked.
The only difference is the magnitude of Verizon's network makes this decision felt on a wider scale.
At the end of the day; though, Verizon is a business, and is legally entitled to protect itself and its customers who help it to generate revenue.
They are, by no means, obligated to be a victim of inbound attacks simply because it means you have to miss "Caturday" one time.
They didn't say anything about a DDoS attack, or any specific port or protocol being blocked (except for maybe IPv4), nor did they make any attempt at content filtering against anyone who pays for a route through their network.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066106</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265627880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Despite the fact that 4chan has this "nasty" image assigned to it, thanks to the shithole that is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/b/, most of the other boards are actually decent.</p><p>Blocking the whole "boards." subdomain is pretty malicious, to put it nicely.</p><p>I just wonder what prompted them to block it all of a sudden, not that long after the subdomain switchover happened too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Despite the fact that 4chan has this " nasty " image assigned to it , thanks to the shithole that is /b/ , most of the other boards are actually decent.Blocking the whole " boards .
" subdomain is pretty malicious , to put it nicely.I just wonder what prompted them to block it all of a sudden , not that long after the subdomain switchover happened too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Despite the fact that 4chan has this "nasty" image assigned to it, thanks to the shithole that is /b/, most of the other boards are actually decent.Blocking the whole "boards.
" subdomain is pretty malicious, to put it nicely.I just wonder what prompted them to block it all of a sudden, not that long after the subdomain switchover happened too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068190</id>
	<title>Not Blocked Now</title>
	<author>hduff</author>
	<datestamp>1265643660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Verizon FIOS has not blocked 4chan here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Verizon FIOS has not blocked 4chan here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Verizon FIOS has not blocked 4chan here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064774</id>
	<title>No problems connecting from here</title>
	<author>killmenow</author>
	<datestamp>1265622840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/good-luck-im-behind-7-proxies" title="knowyourmeme.com" rel="nofollow">But then I'm behind 7 proxies.</a> [knowyourmeme.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But then I 'm behind 7 proxies .
[ knowyourmeme.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But then I'm behind 7 proxies.
[knowyourmeme.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065244</id>
	<title>Re:Well...</title>
	<author>santax</author>
	<datestamp>1265624580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Probably port 9001.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably port 9001 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably port 9001.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069368</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>omfgnosis</author>
	<datestamp>1265658840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No way AT&amp;T would fib.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No way AT&amp;T would fib .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No way AT&amp;T would fib.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068158</id>
	<title>Verizon is unblocking them.</title>
	<author>santax</author>
	<datestamp>1265643300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At least that what's up on 4chan now: Verizon Wireless should be unblocking us later today/tomorrow... (message from Moot)

Maybe they realized whom they had blocked by reading the comments here?</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least that what 's up on 4chan now : Verizon Wireless should be unblocking us later today/tomorrow... ( message from Moot ) Maybe they realized whom they had blocked by reading the comments here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least that what's up on 4chan now: Verizon Wireless should be unblocking us later today/tomorrow... (message from Moot)

Maybe they realized whom they had blocked by reading the comments here?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066038</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Microlith</author>
	<datestamp>1265627580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That might be a plausible explanation were it Verizon's DSL/FIOS service, but Verizon Wireless?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That might be a plausible explanation were it Verizon 's DSL/FIOS service , but Verizon Wireless ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That might be a plausible explanation were it Verizon's DSL/FIOS service, but Verizon Wireless?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069432</id>
	<title>Re:Misleading Summary</title>
	<author>wye43</author>
	<datestamp>1265746440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Indeed, bad summary. Its also only one IP address, one that was actually scanning a large amount of devices - a preparation for an attack.

This is not about censorship, its about an attack that was stopped. But yea, try telling that to people, they prefer the flamebait version of the story.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed , bad summary .
Its also only one IP address , one that was actually scanning a large amount of devices - a preparation for an attack .
This is not about censorship , its about an attack that was stopped .
But yea , try telling that to people , they prefer the flamebait version of the story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed, bad summary.
Its also only one IP address, one that was actually scanning a large amount of devices - a preparation for an attack.
This is not about censorship, its about an attack that was stopped.
But yea, try telling that to people, they prefer the flamebait version of the story.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065254</id>
	<title>Wrong</title>
	<author>Lifyre</author>
	<datestamp>1265624640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm on Verizon Wireless and am surfing 4Chan.org right now...  Perhaps it is a highly localized occurance or does<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. have that much pull?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm on Verizon Wireless and am surfing 4Chan.org right now... Perhaps it is a highly localized occurance or does / .
have that much pull ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm on Verizon Wireless and am surfing 4Chan.org right now...  Perhaps it is a highly localized occurance or does /.
have that much pull?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065742</id>
	<title>Blocked on the droid?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265626380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not blocked from going to 4chan on my droid... so whats this all about?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not blocked from going to 4chan on my droid... so whats this all about ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not blocked from going to 4chan on my droid... so whats this all about?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066348</id>
	<title>Re:I CAN HAZ KITTY PORN?</title>
	<author>houghi</author>
	<datestamp>1265628960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So Verizon is able to decide what is legal and what is not? Great. Instead of sueing some grandma for copyright theft for a few thousands, I can sue them for a few gazillions. If anything illegal gets true, I can sue them all over again. They better start working with a white list of sites that are OK.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So Verizon is able to decide what is legal and what is not ?
Great. Instead of sueing some grandma for copyright theft for a few thousands , I can sue them for a few gazillions .
If anything illegal gets true , I can sue them all over again .
They better start working with a white list of sites that are OK .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So Verizon is able to decide what is legal and what is not?
Great. Instead of sueing some grandma for copyright theft for a few thousands, I can sue them for a few gazillions.
If anything illegal gets true, I can sue them all over again.
They better start working with a white list of sites that are OK.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065932</id>
	<title>DDos via 3G on a mobile?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265627100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hold on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. Verizon wireless is blocking access to 4chan.org via port 80<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. because um<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..<br>Droid users working on a 3G network were able to launch DDoS attacks on the TCP/IP address of a Verizon wireless server<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. via, 3G rather than TCP/IP, and on a phone rather than a terminal?</p><p>either the world has found its next Kevin Mitnick, or Verizon is full of crap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hold on .. Verizon wireless is blocking access to 4chan.org via port 80 .. because um ..Droid users working on a 3G network were able to launch DDoS attacks on the TCP/IP address of a Verizon wireless server .. via , 3G rather than TCP/IP , and on a phone rather than a terminal ? either the world has found its next Kevin Mitnick , or Verizon is full of crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hold on .. Verizon wireless is blocking access to 4chan.org via port 80 .. because um ..Droid users working on a 3G network were able to launch DDoS attacks on the TCP/IP address of a Verizon wireless server .. via, 3G rather than TCP/IP, and on a phone rather than a terminal?either the world has found its next Kevin Mitnick, or Verizon is full of crap.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066334</id>
	<title>Re:Works From Here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265628900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's probably not from 4chan.<br>From 4chan it'd be AIDS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's probably not from 4chan.From 4chan it 'd be AIDS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's probably not from 4chan.From 4chan it'd be AIDS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065094</id>
	<title>Re:Misleading Summary</title>
	<author>ub3r n3u7r4l1st</author>
	<datestamp>1265624100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"4channers aren't exactly the paragon of maturity."</p><p>compare that to myg0t, 4channers are probably lightyears behind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" 4channers are n't exactly the paragon of maturity .
" compare that to myg0t , 4channers are probably lightyears behind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"4channers aren't exactly the paragon of maturity.
"compare that to myg0t, 4channers are probably lightyears behind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065942</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>kill-1</author>
	<datestamp>1265627160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A DDOS attack originating from port 80 of boards.4chan.org? Think again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A DDOS attack originating from port 80 of boards.4chan.org ?
Think again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A DDOS attack originating from port 80 of boards.4chan.org?
Think again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065852</id>
	<title>That was quick!</title>
	<author>Saint Ego</author>
	<datestamp>1265626740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My Verizon Droid sees boards.4chan.com w/o any issue...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My Verizon Droid sees boards.4chan.com w/o any issue.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My Verizon Droid sees boards.4chan.com w/o any issue...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068230</id>
	<title>Just checked</title>
	<author>OrwellianLurker</author>
	<datestamp>1265644320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have Verizon and it isn't blocked for me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have Verizon and it is n't blocked for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have Verizon and it isn't blocked for me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064870</id>
	<title>Re:has the blocking stopped</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265623260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not mentioned in summary: this is only verizon wireless.
<br>
<a href="http://status.4chan.org/" title="4chan.org">http://status.4chan.org/</a> [4chan.org]
<br> <br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not mentioned in summary : this is only verizon wireless .
http : //status.4chan.org/ [ 4chan.org ] .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not mentioned in summary: this is only verizon wireless.
http://status.4chan.org/ [4chan.org]
   ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066538</id>
	<title>andnothingofvaluewaslost</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265629800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Except your basic human rights.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except your basic human rights .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except your basic human rights.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065522</id>
	<title>Is all the hate really necessary?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265625600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>4Chan is just a community.  Sure it is full of immature people who participate in illicit and often illegal activity, but the last time I checked, Verizon is not the enforcers of Federal, State or Local law in any jurisdiction.  If Verizon thinks that members of 4Chan are participating in illegal activities on American soil, then they are well within their rights (as far as I know) to present their information to the proper authorities who can then take action.

Of course this will raise the usual "Your Rights Online" discussions about whether it is legal or a breech of privacy for Verizon to release that information.

Nonetheless, you can't have Net Neutrality and then kick 4Chan off the internet.  It just doesn't work that way (except in China).</htmltext>
<tokenext>4Chan is just a community .
Sure it is full of immature people who participate in illicit and often illegal activity , but the last time I checked , Verizon is not the enforcers of Federal , State or Local law in any jurisdiction .
If Verizon thinks that members of 4Chan are participating in illegal activities on American soil , then they are well within their rights ( as far as I know ) to present their information to the proper authorities who can then take action .
Of course this will raise the usual " Your Rights Online " discussions about whether it is legal or a breech of privacy for Verizon to release that information .
Nonetheless , you ca n't have Net Neutrality and then kick 4Chan off the internet .
It just does n't work that way ( except in China ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4Chan is just a community.
Sure it is full of immature people who participate in illicit and often illegal activity, but the last time I checked, Verizon is not the enforcers of Federal, State or Local law in any jurisdiction.
If Verizon thinks that members of 4Chan are participating in illegal activities on American soil, then they are well within their rights (as far as I know) to present their information to the proper authorities who can then take action.
Of course this will raise the usual "Your Rights Online" discussions about whether it is legal or a breech of privacy for Verizon to release that information.
Nonetheless, you can't have Net Neutrality and then kick 4Chan off the internet.
It just doesn't work that way (except in China).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068840</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>wiredlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1265651100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it more likely that hordes of 4channers were clicking on targeted links and the referrer field in the HTTP headers was pointing to boards.4chan.org. Apparently you can be accused of guilt by association if you jump to another site after visiting 4chan.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it more likely that hordes of 4channers were clicking on targeted links and the referrer field in the HTTP headers was pointing to boards.4chan.org .
Apparently you can be accused of guilt by association if you jump to another site after visiting 4chan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it more likely that hordes of 4channers were clicking on targeted links and the referrer field in the HTTP headers was pointing to boards.4chan.org.
Apparently you can be accused of guilt by association if you jump to another site after visiting 4chan.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065532</id>
	<title>there's an awesome dynamic there</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1265625660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>between your comment and your sig</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>between your comment and your sig</tokentext>
<sentencetext>between your comment and your sig</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064824</id>
	<title>And nothing of value was lost.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265623080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously, nothing of value was lost.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , nothing of value was lost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, nothing of value was lost.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069518</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265748300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Speak up? Or thumbs up?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Speak up ?
Or thumbs up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Speak up?
Or thumbs up?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068648</id>
	<title>Re:I'm 12</title>
	<author>DiEx-15</author>
	<datestamp>1265649000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Steer clear of 4chan my young Padawan. Turn you to the Dark Side of the Force it will.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Steer clear of 4chan my young Padawan .
Turn you to the Dark Side of the Force it will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Steer clear of 4chan my young Padawan.
Turn you to the Dark Side of the Force it will.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067406</id>
	<title>Time to dig down /b/</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265635080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ignore all the cries of andnothingofvaluewaslost, 4chan is a valuable part of the Internet culture, like slashdot and hotmail... even geocities.</p><p>Also, all the people quoting "At first they came for" are also right, you can't expect freedom to be there free of charge forever.</p><p>So this specific event isn't real censorship, it only covers droid users, and will probably only be temporary.</p><p>The problem is that <b>this demonstrates how fragile the system has grown. It was supposed to withstand a nuclear holocaust,</b> but corporate AND government interest in controlling it will ultimately harm freedom of speech for everyone.</p><p>And you can't expect your ISP and your government to protect your freedom.</p><p>The solution? Tor, FreeNET, etc,</p><p>E-mail encription has been a reality for years yet few people use it etc,</p><p>We are not soldiers, we are developers, sysadmins, Internet users, geeks, husbands, fathers, brothers, sons (wives, mothers, sisters, daughters).</p><p>Regardless if you like 4chan or not or whether this turns out to be real censorship or a mistake, take this opportunity to consider if you are educating others about secure options for information transmission/storage, etc.</p><p>Cryptography protects you better the more people uses it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ignore all the cries of andnothingofvaluewaslost , 4chan is a valuable part of the Internet culture , like slashdot and hotmail... even geocities.Also , all the people quoting " At first they came for " are also right , you ca n't expect freedom to be there free of charge forever.So this specific event is n't real censorship , it only covers droid users , and will probably only be temporary.The problem is that this demonstrates how fragile the system has grown .
It was supposed to withstand a nuclear holocaust , but corporate AND government interest in controlling it will ultimately harm freedom of speech for everyone.And you ca n't expect your ISP and your government to protect your freedom.The solution ?
Tor , FreeNET , etc,E-mail encription has been a reality for years yet few people use it etc,We are not soldiers , we are developers , sysadmins , Internet users , geeks , husbands , fathers , brothers , sons ( wives , mothers , sisters , daughters ) .Regardless if you like 4chan or not or whether this turns out to be real censorship or a mistake , take this opportunity to consider if you are educating others about secure options for information transmission/storage , etc.Cryptography protects you better the more people uses it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ignore all the cries of andnothingofvaluewaslost, 4chan is a valuable part of the Internet culture, like slashdot and hotmail... even geocities.Also, all the people quoting "At first they came for" are also right, you can't expect freedom to be there free of charge forever.So this specific event isn't real censorship, it only covers droid users, and will probably only be temporary.The problem is that this demonstrates how fragile the system has grown.
It was supposed to withstand a nuclear holocaust, but corporate AND government interest in controlling it will ultimately harm freedom of speech for everyone.And you can't expect your ISP and your government to protect your freedom.The solution?
Tor, FreeNET, etc,E-mail encription has been a reality for years yet few people use it etc,We are not soldiers, we are developers, sysadmins, Internet users, geeks, husbands, fathers, brothers, sons (wives, mothers, sisters, daughters).Regardless if you like 4chan or not or whether this turns out to be real censorship or a mistake, take this opportunity to consider if you are educating others about secure options for information transmission/storage, etc.Cryptography protects you better the more people uses it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066306</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>MrWeelson</author>
	<datestamp>1265628720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I call an alternative Godwin's Law - as soon as you quote Martin Niem&#246;ller, you've lost the argument.

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First\_they\_came" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First\_they\_came</a> [wikipedia.org]...</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I call an alternative Godwin 's Law - as soon as you quote Martin Niem   ller , you 've lost the argument .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First \ _they \ _came [ wikipedia.org ] .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I call an alternative Godwin's Law - as soon as you quote Martin Niemöller, you've lost the argument.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First\_they\_came [wikipedia.org]...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065986</id>
	<title>Re:I CAN HAZ KITTY PORN?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265627340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Then would it not make more sense to block 7chan?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Then would it not make more sense to block 7chan ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then would it not make more sense to block 7chan?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764</id>
	<title>I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Daimanta</author>
	<datestamp>1265622780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On hand hand this is malignant censorship, the forebode to a society with no free information. On the other hand, this is 4chan.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On hand hand this is malignant censorship , the forebode to a society with no free information .
On the other hand , this is 4chan.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On hand hand this is malignant censorship, the forebode to a society with no free information.
On the other hand, this is 4chan.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065464</id>
	<title>Yeah but which year?</title>
	<author>IceFoot</author>
	<datestamp>1265625420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>...in effect for at least 72 hours since Saturday, February 7.</i><br>(Looks at calendar, sees today is Monday February 8.)<br><b>For 25 points, this happened to 4chan in WHICH YEAR?</b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...in effect for at least 72 hours since Saturday , February 7 .
( Looks at calendar , sees today is Monday February 8 .
) For 25 points , this happened to 4chan in WHICH YEAR ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...in effect for at least 72 hours since Saturday, February 7.
(Looks at calendar, sees today is Monday February 8.
)For 25 points, this happened to 4chan in WHICH YEAR?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065900</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265626980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>On hand hand this is malignant censorship, the forebode to a society with no free information. On the other hand, this is 4chan.....</p></div><p>This is kind of the point, when looking to infringe on your rights they start with an unpopular target.</p><p>Invasive searches at the border? But you don't want the terrorists to win do you?</p><p>Thought crimes?  Won't somebody please think of the children?</p><p>Free speech restrictions on the net? We do it to catch the pedo's and terrorists</p><p>Start with a group nobody will stand up for, get your precedent of bypassing their rights from them, expand to the rest of society later.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>On hand hand this is malignant censorship , the forebode to a society with no free information .
On the other hand , this is 4chan.....This is kind of the point , when looking to infringe on your rights they start with an unpopular target.Invasive searches at the border ?
But you do n't want the terrorists to win do you ? Thought crimes ?
Wo n't somebody please think of the children ? Free speech restrictions on the net ?
We do it to catch the pedo 's and terroristsStart with a group nobody will stand up for , get your precedent of bypassing their rights from them , expand to the rest of society later .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On hand hand this is malignant censorship, the forebode to a society with no free information.
On the other hand, this is 4chan.....This is kind of the point, when looking to infringe on your rights they start with an unpopular target.Invasive searches at the border?
But you don't want the terrorists to win do you?Thought crimes?
Won't somebody please think of the children?Free speech restrictions on the net?
We do it to catch the pedo's and terroristsStart with a group nobody will stand up for, get your precedent of bypassing their rights from them, expand to the rest of society later.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064958</id>
	<title>Well...</title>
	<author>Tei</author>
	<datestamp>1265623500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suppose next thing you do is run anoter apache in port 81...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose next thing you do is run anoter apache in port 81.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose next thing you do is run anoter apache in port 81...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064770</id>
	<title>I'm 12</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265622840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm 12 years old and what is this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm 12 years old and what is this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm 12 years old and what is this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065924</id>
	<title>Re:Is all the hate really necessary?</title>
	<author>DiamondGeezer</author>
	<datestamp>1265627100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The way<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/b/ behaves on 4chan, eventually it will affect the rest of us. <br> <br>

The difference between 4chan and Slashdot is that Slashdot knows the meaning of responsibility to the Internet community, to the people who depend on the Internet for unfiltered news and communication, who depend on software that isn't hacked or compromised. Not all slashdotters know or appreciate that fact. Its only a matter of time before someone (Stephen Conroy?) uses<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/b/ as an excuse to promote massive and intrusive filtering of the Internet **to protect the children**<br> <br>

Spamming the shit out of Verizon might feel good to the pimple-squeezers of 4chan, but picking a fight with a large ISP like Verizon by DDOSing would be a disaster for the Internet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The way /b/ behaves on 4chan , eventually it will affect the rest of us .
The difference between 4chan and Slashdot is that Slashdot knows the meaning of responsibility to the Internet community , to the people who depend on the Internet for unfiltered news and communication , who depend on software that is n't hacked or compromised .
Not all slashdotters know or appreciate that fact .
Its only a matter of time before someone ( Stephen Conroy ?
) uses /b/ as an excuse to promote massive and intrusive filtering of the Internet * * to protect the children * * Spamming the shit out of Verizon might feel good to the pimple-squeezers of 4chan , but picking a fight with a large ISP like Verizon by DDOSing would be a disaster for the Internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The way /b/ behaves on 4chan, eventually it will affect the rest of us.
The difference between 4chan and Slashdot is that Slashdot knows the meaning of responsibility to the Internet community, to the people who depend on the Internet for unfiltered news and communication, who depend on software that isn't hacked or compromised.
Not all slashdotters know or appreciate that fact.
Its only a matter of time before someone (Stephen Conroy?
) uses /b/ as an excuse to promote massive and intrusive filtering of the Internet **to protect the children** 

Spamming the shit out of Verizon might feel good to the pimple-squeezers of 4chan, but picking a fight with a large ISP like Verizon by DDOSing would be a disaster for the Internet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066278</id>
	<title>Re:Misleading Summary</title>
	<author>houghi</author>
	<datestamp>1265628600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>4channers aren't exactly the paragon of maturity.</p><blockquote><div><p>I have an image of a 4channer who tried to get to his site: <a href="http://stuff.gmodsauce.com/FUUUUUUUUUUU.gif" title="gmodsauce.com">http://stuff.gmodsauce.com/FUUUUUUUUUUU.gif</a> [gmodsauce.com]</p></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>4channers are n't exactly the paragon of maturity.I have an image of a 4channer who tried to get to his site : http : //stuff.gmodsauce.com/FUUUUUUUUUUU.gif [ gmodsauce.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4channers aren't exactly the paragon of maturity.I have an image of a 4channer who tried to get to his site: http://stuff.gmodsauce.com/FUUUUUUUUUUU.gif [gmodsauce.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064944</id>
	<title>Re:I CAN HAZ KITTY PORN?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265623440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in b4 pedobear</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in b4 pedobear</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in b4 pedobear</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069964</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265712480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It'll be too late then.  How will you speak when they've already censored all your means of communication?  You seem to have missed the entire point of the quote.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 'll be too late then .
How will you speak when they 've already censored all your means of communication ?
You seem to have missed the entire point of the quote .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It'll be too late then.
How will you speak when they've already censored all your means of communication?
You seem to have missed the entire point of the quote.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065948</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265627220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem is 4chan is loaded with child porn. I used to hang out on their technology and music boards but the random occurrence of CP and other explicit imagery (but mostly the celebration of CP and racism) caused me to stop going there. I don't feel like risking the chance that some stupid cached image might screw my life over at some point in the future.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is 4chan is loaded with child porn .
I used to hang out on their technology and music boards but the random occurrence of CP and other explicit imagery ( but mostly the celebration of CP and racism ) caused me to stop going there .
I do n't feel like risking the chance that some stupid cached image might screw my life over at some point in the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is 4chan is loaded with child porn.
I used to hang out on their technology and music boards but the random occurrence of CP and other explicit imagery (but mostly the celebration of CP and racism) caused me to stop going there.
I don't feel like risking the chance that some stupid cached image might screw my life over at some point in the future.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065560</id>
	<title>VZW customers with Android phones have hope</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265625720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's an app ($1.99 in the market) called Chandroid<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/b/rowser which will allow you to get to 4chan on VZW, even though it's blocked otherwise.   You're essentially paying for a browser formatted more for image boards and access to a proxy service.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's an app ( $ 1.99 in the market ) called Chandroid /b/rowser which will allow you to get to 4chan on VZW , even though it 's blocked otherwise .
You 're essentially paying for a browser formatted more for image boards and access to a proxy service .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's an app ($1.99 in the market) called Chandroid /b/rowser which will allow you to get to 4chan on VZW, even though it's blocked otherwise.
You're essentially paying for a browser formatted more for image boards and access to a proxy service.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065402</id>
	<title>Re:Misleading Summary</title>
	<author>RavenChild</author>
	<datestamp>1265625180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/02/08/verizon-wireless-temporarily-blocks-some-4chan-traffic/" title="wsj.com" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/02/08/verizon-wireless-temporarily-blocks-some-4chan-traffic/</a> [wsj.com]
<br> <br>
Looks like it was only part of 4chan and the blocked parts are unblocked again.  No news here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/02/08/verizon-wireless-temporarily-blocks-some-4chan-traffic/ [ wsj.com ] Looks like it was only part of 4chan and the blocked parts are unblocked again .
No news here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/02/08/verizon-wireless-temporarily-blocks-some-4chan-traffic/ [wsj.com]
 
Looks like it was only part of 4chan and the blocked parts are unblocked again.
No news here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067342</id>
	<title>Re:Is all the hate really necessary?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265634720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's say, for a minute, that carrying traffic to-from Verizon is definitely harmful to Verizon's network. Why shouldn't they be able to block it on those grounds?</p><p>Nothing good, ever, has come out of that web site. I'm personally in favor of the guy who runs it -- whose name is known -- being arrested and sent to prison for a very long time for knowingly running a web site where illegal activity is allowed to flourish. Safe-Harbor provisions don't apply when you're acting in bad faith, after all -- the amount of "wink, wink, nudge, nudge, nothing to see here" going on over there regarding child pornography (actual children, not sexting teens), DDOS attacks, hacking attempts, physical and cyber stalking, etc. can't be ignored any more.</p><p>I'm very, very glad that at least several "Anonymous" types who have been involved with DDOS attacks have been convicted. The Internet is no longer the Wild Wild West, and should never be again. Allowing it to be, and for groups like those from 4chan, to exist is bad for everyone. Even if they did nothing more than set up a logging trap, record IPs of everyone who visited<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/b/ at any given point in time, and go knocking on doors just to scare people a bit would go a long way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's say , for a minute , that carrying traffic to-from Verizon is definitely harmful to Verizon 's network .
Why should n't they be able to block it on those grounds ? Nothing good , ever , has come out of that web site .
I 'm personally in favor of the guy who runs it -- whose name is known -- being arrested and sent to prison for a very long time for knowingly running a web site where illegal activity is allowed to flourish .
Safe-Harbor provisions do n't apply when you 're acting in bad faith , after all -- the amount of " wink , wink , nudge , nudge , nothing to see here " going on over there regarding child pornography ( actual children , not sexting teens ) , DDOS attacks , hacking attempts , physical and cyber stalking , etc .
ca n't be ignored any more.I 'm very , very glad that at least several " Anonymous " types who have been involved with DDOS attacks have been convicted .
The Internet is no longer the Wild Wild West , and should never be again .
Allowing it to be , and for groups like those from 4chan , to exist is bad for everyone .
Even if they did nothing more than set up a logging trap , record IPs of everyone who visited /b/ at any given point in time , and go knocking on doors just to scare people a bit would go a long way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's say, for a minute, that carrying traffic to-from Verizon is definitely harmful to Verizon's network.
Why shouldn't they be able to block it on those grounds?Nothing good, ever, has come out of that web site.
I'm personally in favor of the guy who runs it -- whose name is known -- being arrested and sent to prison for a very long time for knowingly running a web site where illegal activity is allowed to flourish.
Safe-Harbor provisions don't apply when you're acting in bad faith, after all -- the amount of "wink, wink, nudge, nudge, nothing to see here" going on over there regarding child pornography (actual children, not sexting teens), DDOS attacks, hacking attempts, physical and cyber stalking, etc.
can't be ignored any more.I'm very, very glad that at least several "Anonymous" types who have been involved with DDOS attacks have been convicted.
The Internet is no longer the Wild Wild West, and should never be again.
Allowing it to be, and for groups like those from 4chan, to exist is bad for everyone.
Even if they did nothing more than set up a logging trap, record IPs of everyone who visited /b/ at any given point in time, and go knocking on doors just to scare people a bit would go a long way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066640</id>
	<title>I can see the AT&amp;T rebuttal commercials now..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265630280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Tired of crappy 4C(han) coverage?, get real 4C(han) coverage with AT&amp;T."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Tired of crappy 4C ( han ) coverage ? , get real 4C ( han ) coverage with AT&amp;T .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Tired of crappy 4C(han) coverage?, get real 4C(han) coverage with AT&amp;T.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065102</id>
	<title>FiOS is not affected</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265624100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well since I posted this on Gizmodo I'll post it here too I guess...I live near Philadelphia and have Verizon FiOS and I have no problem whatsoever getting to 4chan or the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/b/ boards.  Other people were saying it only has to do with Verizon Wireless such as 3G modem cards.  I'm not sure if that's the case but FiOS in the Philly area is definitely not affected (yet anyway).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well since I posted this on Gizmodo I 'll post it here too I guess...I live near Philadelphia and have Verizon FiOS and I have no problem whatsoever getting to 4chan or the /b/ boards .
Other people were saying it only has to do with Verizon Wireless such as 3G modem cards .
I 'm not sure if that 's the case but FiOS in the Philly area is definitely not affected ( yet anyway ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well since I posted this on Gizmodo I'll post it here too I guess...I live near Philadelphia and have Verizon FiOS and I have no problem whatsoever getting to 4chan or the /b/ boards.
Other people were saying it only has to do with Verizon Wireless such as 3G modem cards.
I'm not sure if that's the case but FiOS in the Philly area is definitely not affected (yet anyway).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069226</id>
	<title>shenanigans</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265656020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I wanted to make a ton of people go to my website, I would just post a blog somewhere claiming AT&amp;T or Verizon blocked access to it and watch 500k users  "test" it from their connection.  Not only that: there is a LOT of misinformation and FUD here.  What Verizon's statement is saying (http://policyblog.verizon.com/BlogPost/697/ProtectingOurCustomersandOurNetwork.aspx) is that specific IPs were SMS flooding Verizon wireless users.  Verizon's *wireless* business unit blocked the attacking IP addresses to protect their customers until the attacks stopped, just like every single slashdotter and 4chaner wishes their ISP would do for them if they were being attacked.  The only difference is the magnitude of Verizon's network makes this decision felt on a wider scale.  At the end of the day; though, Verizon is a business, and is legally entitled to protect itself and its customers who help it to generate revenue.  They are, by no means, obligated to be a victim of inbound attacks simply because it means you have to miss "Caturday" one time.  They didn't say anything about a DDoS attack, or any specific port or protocol being blocked (except for maybe IPv4), nor did they make any attempt at content filtering against anyone who pays for a route through their network.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I wanted to make a ton of people go to my website , I would just post a blog somewhere claiming AT&amp;T or Verizon blocked access to it and watch 500k users " test " it from their connection .
Not only that : there is a LOT of misinformation and FUD here .
What Verizon 's statement is saying ( http : //policyblog.verizon.com/BlogPost/697/ProtectingOurCustomersandOurNetwork.aspx ) is that specific IPs were SMS flooding Verizon wireless users .
Verizon 's * wireless * business unit blocked the attacking IP addresses to protect their customers until the attacks stopped , just like every single slashdotter and 4chaner wishes their ISP would do for them if they were being attacked .
The only difference is the magnitude of Verizon 's network makes this decision felt on a wider scale .
At the end of the day ; though , Verizon is a business , and is legally entitled to protect itself and its customers who help it to generate revenue .
They are , by no means , obligated to be a victim of inbound attacks simply because it means you have to miss " Caturday " one time .
They did n't say anything about a DDoS attack , or any specific port or protocol being blocked ( except for maybe IPv4 ) , nor did they make any attempt at content filtering against anyone who pays for a route through their network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I wanted to make a ton of people go to my website, I would just post a blog somewhere claiming AT&amp;T or Verizon blocked access to it and watch 500k users  "test" it from their connection.
Not only that: there is a LOT of misinformation and FUD here.
What Verizon's statement is saying (http://policyblog.verizon.com/BlogPost/697/ProtectingOurCustomersandOurNetwork.aspx) is that specific IPs were SMS flooding Verizon wireless users.
Verizon's *wireless* business unit blocked the attacking IP addresses to protect their customers until the attacks stopped, just like every single slashdotter and 4chaner wishes their ISP would do for them if they were being attacked.
The only difference is the magnitude of Verizon's network makes this decision felt on a wider scale.
At the end of the day; though, Verizon is a business, and is legally entitled to protect itself and its customers who help it to generate revenue.
They are, by no means, obligated to be a victim of inbound attacks simply because it means you have to miss "Caturday" one time.
They didn't say anything about a DDoS attack, or any specific port or protocol being blocked (except for maybe IPv4), nor did they make any attempt at content filtering against anyone who pays for a route through their network.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069896</id>
	<title>Re:Wouldn't want to work at Verizon support right</title>
	<author>meringuoid</author>
	<datestamp>1265711520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Hi, is that Verizon tech support? Yeah. I have a problem. You see, I was just playing Battletoads online and..."</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Hi , is that Verizon tech support ?
Yeah. I have a problem .
You see , I was just playing Battletoads online and... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Hi, is that Verizon tech support?
Yeah. I have a problem.
You see, I was just playing Battletoads online and..."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065662</id>
	<title>Saturday, February 7</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265626140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> 4chan's downtime for Verizon users has been in effect for at least 72 hours since <em>Saturday, February 7.</em></p> </div><p>Has this been going on since Saturday, February 6, 2010; Sunday, February 7, 2010; or Saturday, February 7, 2009?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>4chan 's downtime for Verizon users has been in effect for at least 72 hours since Saturday , February 7 .
Has this been going on since Saturday , February 6 , 2010 ; Sunday , February 7 , 2010 ; or Saturday , February 7 , 2009 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> 4chan's downtime for Verizon users has been in effect for at least 72 hours since Saturday, February 7.
Has this been going on since Saturday, February 6, 2010; Sunday, February 7, 2010; or Saturday, February 7, 2009?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064790</id>
	<title>has the blocking stopped</title>
	<author>Pretzalzz</author>
	<datestamp>1265622900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Has the blocking stopped?  Because I can't confirm this on Verizon DSL.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has the blocking stopped ?
Because I ca n't confirm this on Verizon DSL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has the blocking stopped?
Because I can't confirm this on Verizon DSL.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065528</id>
	<title>Re:I CAN HAZ KITTY PORN?</title>
	<author>g0at</author>
	<datestamp>1265625660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> While I don't agree with Verizon on principal</p></div><p>What about interest?</p><p>b</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>While I do n't agree with Verizon on principalWhat about interest ? b</tokentext>
<sentencetext> While I don't agree with Verizon on principalWhat about interest?b
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065250</id>
	<title>Just spoke with a manager</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265624640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They told me it will be unblocked this evening.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They told me it will be unblocked this evening .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They told me it will be unblocked this evening.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31071016</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah but which year?</title>
	<author>soulsteal</author>
	<datestamp>1265725380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Duh, it was 1981. Learn your history.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Duh , it was 1981 .
Learn your history .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Duh, it was 1981.
Learn your history.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065432</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265625300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm able to browse 4chan's forums just fine on my Droid while on Verizon's 3G network. No problems here, so I'm not sure what everyone else is experiencing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm able to browse 4chan 's forums just fine on my Droid while on Verizon 's 3G network .
No problems here , so I 'm not sure what everyone else is experiencing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm able to browse 4chan's forums just fine on my Droid while on Verizon's 3G network.
No problems here, so I'm not sure what everyone else is experiencing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066068</id>
	<title>Re:rebellion?</title>
	<author>jcoy42</author>
	<datestamp>1265627700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No more than someone getting busted for drinking and driving will stop everyone else from doing the same.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No more than someone getting busted for drinking and driving will stop everyone else from doing the same .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No more than someone getting busted for drinking and driving will stop everyone else from doing the same.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065058</id>
	<title>Re:rebellion?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265623920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>are you kidding?</p><p>Anonymous has not once outed one of their own to FBI for CP or such, finding that very entertaining.<br>They are very pro-darwinian: if one who gets caught, it means he hadn't deserved to be one of them. Unless he fell on the line of duty; then he will be honored.</p><p>Did you think the arrest after publishing Palin's emails stopped anyone there?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...actually, a new attack is in the works. Keep an ear open for news from Australia on 10th.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>are you kidding ? Anonymous has not once outed one of their own to FBI for CP or such , finding that very entertaining.They are very pro-darwinian : if one who gets caught , it means he had n't deserved to be one of them .
Unless he fell on the line of duty ; then he will be honored.Did you think the arrest after publishing Palin 's emails stopped anyone there ?
...actually , a new attack is in the works .
Keep an ear open for news from Australia on 10th .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>are you kidding?Anonymous has not once outed one of their own to FBI for CP or such, finding that very entertaining.They are very pro-darwinian: if one who gets caught, it means he hadn't deserved to be one of them.
Unless he fell on the line of duty; then he will be honored.Did you think the arrest after publishing Palin's emails stopped anyone there?
...actually, a new attack is in the works.
Keep an ear open for news from Australia on 10th.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068186</id>
	<title>Re:For the uninitiated...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265643600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go to images.google.com and search for goatse, the answer is in there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go to images.google.com and search for goatse , the answer is in there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go to images.google.com and search for goatse, the answer is in there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064926</id>
	<title>Re:I CAN HAZ KITTY PORN?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265623380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess they must then ban YouTube too. More than once I have seen very suspicious looking porn there and they were even slower at removing it than 4chan usually is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess they must then ban YouTube too .
More than once I have seen very suspicious looking porn there and they were even slower at removing it than 4chan usually is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess they must then ban YouTube too.
More than once I have seen very suspicious looking porn there and they were even slower at removing it than 4chan usually is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066078</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265627760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if instead of 4chan, they decided to block a different massive message board system... Slashdot.</p><p>Same attitude?  Thought not.  The central problem is that Verison is BLOCKING YOU FROM SOME OF THE INTERNET.  So much for net neutrality... not that it ever had a hope in hell anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if instead of 4chan , they decided to block a different massive message board system... Slashdot.Same attitude ?
Thought not .
The central problem is that Verison is BLOCKING YOU FROM SOME OF THE INTERNET .
So much for net neutrality... not that it ever had a hope in hell anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if instead of 4chan, they decided to block a different massive message board system... Slashdot.Same attitude?
Thought not.
The central problem is that Verison is BLOCKING YOU FROM SOME OF THE INTERNET.
So much for net neutrality... not that it ever had a hope in hell anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065690</id>
	<title>Re:Well...</title>
	<author>trapnest</author>
	<datestamp>1265626200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your point is still valid but FYI 4chan uses nginx.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your point is still valid but FYI 4chan uses nginx .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your point is still valid but FYI 4chan uses nginx.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068398</id>
	<title>www.hidemyass.com</title>
	<author>bizitch</author>
	<datestamp>1265646000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>proxy around the stupid ISP - sheesh</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>proxy around the stupid ISP - sheesh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>proxy around the stupid ISP - sheesh</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069500</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265748000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, as usual, people have to die before other people start to realize something is amiss.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , as usual , people have to die before other people start to realize something is amiss .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, as usual, people have to die before other people start to realize something is amiss.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064858</id>
	<title>Bad summary</title>
	<author>Alcimedes</author>
	<datestamp>1265623200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Granted it's<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. so I don't expect anything else.</p><p>The block is only in place for Verizon Wireless traffic, not all of Verizon's traffic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Granted it 's / .
so I do n't expect anything else.The block is only in place for Verizon Wireless traffic , not all of Verizon 's traffic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Granted it's /.
so I don't expect anything else.The block is only in place for Verizon Wireless traffic, not all of Verizon's traffic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064844</id>
	<title>Misleading Summary</title>
	<author>twidarkling</author>
	<datestamp>1265623140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Moot himself said on the 4chan status blog that it's only Verizon Wireless from what they can tell.</p><p>It should be interesting to see the fallout from this. 4channers aren't exactly the paragon of maturity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Moot himself said on the 4chan status blog that it 's only Verizon Wireless from what they can tell.It should be interesting to see the fallout from this .
4channers are n't exactly the paragon of maturity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Moot himself said on the 4chan status blog that it's only Verizon Wireless from what they can tell.It should be interesting to see the fallout from this.
4channers aren't exactly the paragon of maturity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31072992</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265735220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By which point your free speech and movement have been so thoroughly trashed that you won't even have a place to speak up - let alone be allowed to it.</p><p>Seriously if you understand the transitive property enough to see one slippery slope, you would think you might be able to see the slope its all sitting on.</p><p>When they came for 4chan, I didn't speak up cause I think it's trash.<br>When they came for internet porn, I didn't speak up cause it wasn't important enough.<br>When they came for slashdot, I didn't speak up cause it still wasn't important enough.<br>When they came for me, there wasn't any fucking place left for anyone to speak up about it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By which point your free speech and movement have been so thoroughly trashed that you wo n't even have a place to speak up - let alone be allowed to it.Seriously if you understand the transitive property enough to see one slippery slope , you would think you might be able to see the slope its all sitting on.When they came for 4chan , I did n't speak up cause I think it 's trash.When they came for internet porn , I did n't speak up cause it was n't important enough.When they came for slashdot , I did n't speak up cause it still was n't important enough.When they came for me , there was n't any fucking place left for anyone to speak up about it : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By which point your free speech and movement have been so thoroughly trashed that you won't even have a place to speak up - let alone be allowed to it.Seriously if you understand the transitive property enough to see one slippery slope, you would think you might be able to see the slope its all sitting on.When they came for 4chan, I didn't speak up cause I think it's trash.When they came for internet porn, I didn't speak up cause it wasn't important enough.When they came for slashdot, I didn't speak up cause it still wasn't important enough.When they came for me, there wasn't any fucking place left for anyone to speak up about it :(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065996</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265627400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>First they came for 4chan, and I did not speak out -- because I was not a 4chan member...</p></div><p>neither am i</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>First they came for 4chan , and I did not speak out -- because I was not a 4chan member...neither am i</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First they came for 4chan, and I did not speak out -- because I was not a 4chan member...neither am i
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067070</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>MostAwesomeDude</author>
	<datestamp>1265632560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The people modding you seem to be unaware that 4chan doesn't have memberships.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The people modding you seem to be unaware that 4chan does n't have memberships .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The people modding you seem to be unaware that 4chan doesn't have memberships.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064868</id>
	<title>4chan working fine on FIOS in SE PA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265623200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As of now it is working fine just outside Philly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As of now it is working fine just outside Philly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As of now it is working fine just outside Philly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065460</id>
	<title>Re:rebellion?</title>
	<author>trapnest</author>
	<datestamp>1265625420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>&gt;Keep an ear open for news from Australia on 10th.<br>lol</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Keep an ear open for news from Australia on 10th.lol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;Keep an ear open for news from Australia on 10th.lol</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067160</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265633280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A DDOS attack originating from AT&amp;T's zombie host targeting boards.4chan.org 80.<br>Really, think again smart ass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A DDOS attack originating from AT&amp;T 's zombie host targeting boards.4chan.org 80.Really , think again smart ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A DDOS attack originating from AT&amp;T's zombie host targeting boards.4chan.org 80.Really, think again smart ass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067094</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Stormwatch</author>
	<datestamp>1265632740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes! Freedom for the internet hate machine!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes !
Freedom for the internet hate machine !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes!
Freedom for the internet hate machine!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065002</id>
	<title>Wouldn't want to work at Verizon support right now</title>
	<author>ZankerH</author>
	<datestamp>1265623680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>"VERIZON YUO HAVE MADE POWERFULL ENIMEY<br>

ANONIMOUSE IS LEEGON"
<br> <br>
<em> Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like yelling. Filter error: </em></htmltext>
<tokenext>" VERIZON YUO HAVE MADE POWERFULL ENIMEY ANONIMOUSE IS LEEGON " Filter error : Do n't use so many caps .
It 's like yelling .
Filter error :</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"VERIZON YUO HAVE MADE POWERFULL ENIMEY

ANONIMOUSE IS LEEGON"
 
 Filter error: Don't use so many caps.
It's like yelling.
Filter error: </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31072350</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>godrik</author>
	<datestamp>1265732520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, this line is good. Is it yours or someone famous ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , this line is good .
Is it yours or someone famous ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, this line is good.
Is it yours or someone famous ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066402</id>
	<title>Perhaps it's a reciprocal ban</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265629200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've never been to 4chan so I went to check it out, and here is the response I got -</p><p>"<br>You are banned!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;\_;<br>Banned You have been permanently banned from all boards for the following reason:</p><p>Personal information (phone number)/call to invasion, proxy</p><p>Your ban was filed on May 30th, 2008. This ban will not expire.</p><p>According to our server, your IP is: 72.25.xx.xx. The name you were posting with was Anonymous.</p><p>Your appeal was reviewed and denied. You may not appeal this ban again.<br>"</p><p>Permanent bans of dynamic IP's doesn't exactly display a level of l337 that I would fear!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've never been to 4chan so I went to check it out , and here is the response I got - " You are banned !
; \ _ ; Banned You have been permanently banned from all boards for the following reason : Personal information ( phone number ) /call to invasion , proxyYour ban was filed on May 30th , 2008 .
This ban will not expire.According to our server , your IP is : 72.25.xx.xx .
The name you were posting with was Anonymous.Your appeal was reviewed and denied .
You may not appeal this ban again .
" Permanent bans of dynamic IP 's does n't exactly display a level of l337 that I would fear !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've never been to 4chan so I went to check it out, and here is the response I got -"You are banned!
;\_;Banned You have been permanently banned from all boards for the following reason:Personal information (phone number)/call to invasion, proxyYour ban was filed on May 30th, 2008.
This ban will not expire.According to our server, your IP is: 72.25.xx.xx.
The name you were posting with was Anonymous.Your appeal was reviewed and denied.
You may not appeal this ban again.
"Permanent bans of dynamic IP's doesn't exactly display a level of l337 that I would fear!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066484</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265629500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On the one hand, it's censorship.  In the other hand, there's your penis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the one hand , it 's censorship .
In the other hand , there 's your penis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the one hand, it's censorship.
In the other hand, there's your penis.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065854</id>
	<title>What are they thingking?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265626740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whatever annoyances carrying traffic to/from 4chan may have been causing them, how can that possibly outweigh the stings they're going to get from poking the bees nest with a stick?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whatever annoyances carrying traffic to/from 4chan may have been causing them , how can that possibly outweigh the stings they 're going to get from poking the bees nest with a stick ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whatever annoyances carrying traffic to/from 4chan may have been causing them, how can that possibly outweigh the stings they're going to get from poking the bees nest with a stick?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065196</id>
	<title>Re:Wouldn't want to work at Verizon support right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265624460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, but the support calls will drop off around 5pm when all the kids parents come home, they won't have free range of the phones. Plus don't college kids have exams now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but the support calls will drop off around 5pm when all the kids parents come home , they wo n't have free range of the phones .
Plus do n't college kids have exams now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but the support calls will drop off around 5pm when all the kids parents come home, they won't have free range of the phones.
Plus don't college kids have exams now?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067352</id>
	<title>Forever blocking email/SMS</title>
	<author>bwave</author>
	<datestamp>1265634780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why does this surprise anyone?   They randomly blocked our mail server from sending SMS messages, even though we are on no blacklists, have SPF &amp; SNDS setup, etc.  It's impossible to get through to them (anyone have a good email/phone contact)  and we finally got someone at Verizon Wireless to fight through the red-tape and get us restored, even though they swear they didn't change anything it started working after days of complaining, and dozens of angry firefighters calling them  (we do text messaging for multiple fire departments)

They've done this many times to our email server as well.

I still love how Verizon/Comcast block Port 25 thinking that moving to a new port will do anything to truely stop spam.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does this surprise anyone ?
They randomly blocked our mail server from sending SMS messages , even though we are on no blacklists , have SPF &amp; SNDS setup , etc .
It 's impossible to get through to them ( anyone have a good email/phone contact ) and we finally got someone at Verizon Wireless to fight through the red-tape and get us restored , even though they swear they did n't change anything it started working after days of complaining , and dozens of angry firefighters calling them ( we do text messaging for multiple fire departments ) They 've done this many times to our email server as well .
I still love how Verizon/Comcast block Port 25 thinking that moving to a new port will do anything to truely stop spam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does this surprise anyone?
They randomly blocked our mail server from sending SMS messages, even though we are on no blacklists, have SPF &amp; SNDS setup, etc.
It's impossible to get through to them (anyone have a good email/phone contact)  and we finally got someone at Verizon Wireless to fight through the red-tape and get us restored, even though they swear they didn't change anything it started working after days of complaining, and dozens of angry firefighters calling them  (we do text messaging for multiple fire departments)

They've done this many times to our email server as well.
I still love how Verizon/Comcast block Port 25 thinking that moving to a new port will do anything to truely stop spam.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067996</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Bloodoflethe</author>
	<datestamp>1265641140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone needs more coffee so they can post coherently.  Username status: Still Valid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone needs more coffee so they can post coherently .
Username status : Still Valid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone needs more coffee so they can post coherently.
Username status: Still Valid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065112</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>BoppreH</author>
	<datestamp>1265624160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Either way, it's bad. 4chan is like a giant prison.<br> <br>Guess what happens when you knock the walls down...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Either way , it 's bad .
4chan is like a giant prison .
Guess what happens when you knock the walls down.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Either way, it's bad.
4chan is like a giant prison.
Guess what happens when you knock the walls down...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069140</id>
	<title>The motivation for doing this was obvious. . .</title>
	<author>R3coiler</author>
	<datestamp>1265654700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some Verizon exec finally got sick of being Rickrolled, and he decide to take out his wrath on the closest manifestation of the internet he could find.

FWIW, this is also why Youtube is blocked in China.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some Verizon exec finally got sick of being Rickrolled , and he decide to take out his wrath on the closest manifestation of the internet he could find .
FWIW , this is also why Youtube is blocked in China .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some Verizon exec finally got sick of being Rickrolled, and he decide to take out his wrath on the closest manifestation of the internet he could find.
FWIW, this is also why Youtube is blocked in China.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064872</id>
	<title>It's for the greater good, people</title>
	<author>digitalsushi</author>
	<datestamp>1265623260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's no such thing as a "slippery slope" for you to fall down; this is to protect ourselves from egregious content.  Surely as descent humans we can agree that, at times, you have to make a judgment call that affects other people.  Finally, everything in this comment is 9000 times sarcastic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's no such thing as a " slippery slope " for you to fall down ; this is to protect ourselves from egregious content .
Surely as descent humans we can agree that , at times , you have to make a judgment call that affects other people .
Finally , everything in this comment is 9000 times sarcastic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's no such thing as a "slippery slope" for you to fall down; this is to protect ourselves from egregious content.
Surely as descent humans we can agree that, at times, you have to make a judgment call that affects other people.
Finally, everything in this comment is 9000 times sarcastic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065260</id>
	<title>Re:I CAN HAZ KITTY PORN?</title>
	<author>scorp1us</author>
	<datestamp>1265624640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know much about the #chans, but I don't think 4chan is the kiddie one. Infact the little #chan research I've done (after someone said  to me:"You DONT piss off 4chan!", me:"WTF is 4chan?") was that 4chan expelled the kiddie porn people a while back, proving, that 4chan does have limits, which was news to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know much about the # chans , but I do n't think 4chan is the kiddie one .
Infact the little # chan research I 've done ( after someone said to me : " You DONT piss off 4chan !
" , me : " WTF is 4chan ?
" ) was that 4chan expelled the kiddie porn people a while back , proving , that 4chan does have limits , which was news to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know much about the #chans, but I don't think 4chan is the kiddie one.
Infact the little #chan research I've done (after someone said  to me:"You DONT piss off 4chan!
", me:"WTF is 4chan?
") was that 4chan expelled the kiddie porn people a while back, proving, that 4chan does have limits, which was news to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065202</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265624460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wrong, on the other hand you have 5 fingers.  I'm not sure about hand hand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wrong , on the other hand you have 5 fingers .
I 'm not sure about hand hand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wrong, on the other hand you have 5 fingers.
I'm not sure about hand hand.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064826</id>
	<title>Only Wireless Customers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265623080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The ban seems to be on the Verizon Wireless network as people who have a wired connection seem to not be having any problems.  At least that's what the comments in the Gizmodo article states.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The ban seems to be on the Verizon Wireless network as people who have a wired connection seem to not be having any problems .
At least that 's what the comments in the Gizmodo article states .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The ban seems to be on the Verizon Wireless network as people who have a wired connection seem to not be having any problems.
At least that's what the comments in the Gizmodo article states.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065122</id>
	<title>Re:Misleading Summary</title>
	<author>kriston</author>
	<datestamp>1265624160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even the Slashdot moderators don't bother to RTFA.<br>Dopes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even the Slashdot moderators do n't bother to RTFA.Dopes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even the Slashdot moderators don't bother to RTFA.Dopes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064892</id>
	<title>Re:has the blocking stopped</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265623260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems to be just Version Wireless</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems to be just Version Wireless</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems to be just Version Wireless</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31074308</id>
	<title>everything's fine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265739780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm getting through fine on my Verizon Storm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm getting through fine on my Verizon Storm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm getting through fine on my Verizon Storm.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064766</id>
	<title>rebellion?</title>
	<author>Lord Ender</author>
	<datestamp>1265622780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Didn't some kid just get three years in jail for participating in an anti-Scientology DoS attack which was organized on 4chan?</p><p>Will that be enough to keep the users in line?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't some kid just get three years in jail for participating in an anti-Scientology DoS attack which was organized on 4chan ? Will that be enough to keep the users in line ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't some kid just get three years in jail for participating in an anti-Scientology DoS attack which was organized on 4chan?Will that be enough to keep the users in line?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064982</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>keithjr</author>
	<datestamp>1265623620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm going to go with a third option: ignoring Internet sensationalism.  I recall a recent incident where it appeared AT&amp;T was "censoring" 4chan.  Turns out AT&amp;T was just trying to stem a massive DDOS attack originating from that and other domains.  <br> <br>

I expect a statement from Verizon shortly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm going to go with a third option : ignoring Internet sensationalism .
I recall a recent incident where it appeared AT&amp;T was " censoring " 4chan .
Turns out AT&amp;T was just trying to stem a massive DDOS attack originating from that and other domains .
I expect a statement from Verizon shortly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm going to go with a third option: ignoring Internet sensationalism.
I recall a recent incident where it appeared AT&amp;T was "censoring" 4chan.
Turns out AT&amp;T was just trying to stem a massive DDOS attack originating from that and other domains.
I expect a statement from Verizon shortly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066456</id>
	<title>that's not now the quote goes</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1265629380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the correct quote is</p><p>"First they came for 4chan, and I did not speak out--because I was looking at boobies;<br>Then they came for fark, and I did not speak out--because I was looking at boobies;<br>Then they came for slashdot, and I did not speak out--because I was looking at boobies;<br>Then they came for the boobies-and I started building truckbombs, mailing anthrax, and hijacking airplanes."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the correct quote is " First they came for 4chan , and I did not speak out--because I was looking at boobies ; Then they came for fark , and I did not speak out--because I was looking at boobies ; Then they came for slashdot , and I did not speak out--because I was looking at boobies ; Then they came for the boobies-and I started building truckbombs , mailing anthrax , and hijacking airplanes .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the correct quote is"First they came for 4chan, and I did not speak out--because I was looking at boobies;Then they came for fark, and I did not speak out--because I was looking at boobies;Then they came for slashdot, and I did not speak out--because I was looking at boobies;Then they came for the boobies-and I started building truckbombs, mailing anthrax, and hijacking airplanes.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066840</id>
	<title>Re:rebellion?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265631240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Anonymous has not once outed one of their own to FBI for CP or such, finding that very entertaining.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Well, you're wrong. I can think of two or three instances of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/b/ successfully pedo-baiting and getting results (brb, church). Of course you also do not threaten football, and let's not forget the pipe-bomb kid.<br>
<br>
Sometimes turning the fuckwits in is more entertaining.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anonymous has not once outed one of their own to FBI for CP or such , finding that very entertaining .
Well , you 're wrong .
I can think of two or three instances of /b/ successfully pedo-baiting and getting results ( brb , church ) .
Of course you also do not threaten football , and let 's not forget the pipe-bomb kid .
Sometimes turning the fuckwits in is more entertaining .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anonymous has not once outed one of their own to FBI for CP or such, finding that very entertaining.
Well, you're wrong.
I can think of two or three instances of /b/ successfully pedo-baiting and getting results (brb, church).
Of course you also do not threaten football, and let's not forget the pipe-bomb kid.
Sometimes turning the fuckwits in is more entertaining.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066714</id>
	<title>I am on Verizon Fios and can get to it just fine</title>
	<author>chrispix</author>
	<datestamp>1265630640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not sure if it is just Wireless, as it did mention wireless explicitly along with verizon in general. But Fios is up for me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not sure if it is just Wireless , as it did mention wireless explicitly along with verizon in general .
But Fios is up for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not sure if it is just Wireless, as it did mention wireless explicitly along with verizon in general.
But Fios is up for me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065322</id>
	<title>Seems like they stopped the Block</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265624880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I heard about this yesterday, checked and it was indeed blocked on my DROID(worked on wi-fi, didn't work on 3G). I called up to complain, all I got was a complain filled in, but I just tried to access<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/g/ on 3G and it worked fine. I tried other boards to be sure and they all seemed to work fine. Might be related to me complaining, but at least it seems unblocked in the Seattle area.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard about this yesterday , checked and it was indeed blocked on my DROID ( worked on wi-fi , did n't work on 3G ) .
I called up to complain , all I got was a complain filled in , but I just tried to access /g/ on 3G and it worked fine .
I tried other boards to be sure and they all seemed to work fine .
Might be related to me complaining , but at least it seems unblocked in the Seattle area .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard about this yesterday, checked and it was indeed blocked on my DROID(worked on wi-fi, didn't work on 3G).
I called up to complain, all I got was a complain filled in, but I just tried to access /g/ on 3G and it worked fine.
I tried other boards to be sure and they all seemed to work fine.
Might be related to me complaining, but at least it seems unblocked in the Seattle area.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066690</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265630460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Free speech is only free if the speech you hate is free.</p></div><p>I can't comprehend why so many people in this thread (not to mention mods) don't understand this statement of fact. It's math, people.</p><p>If all speech is free,<br>and speech you hate is speech,<br>then speech you hate is free.</p><p>Does it need a color-coded spreadsheet or something?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Free speech is only free if the speech you hate is free.I ca n't comprehend why so many people in this thread ( not to mention mods ) do n't understand this statement of fact .
It 's math , people.If all speech is free,and speech you hate is speech,then speech you hate is free.Does it need a color-coded spreadsheet or something ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Free speech is only free if the speech you hate is free.I can't comprehend why so many people in this thread (not to mention mods) don't understand this statement of fact.
It's math, people.If all speech is free,and speech you hate is speech,then speech you hate is free.Does it need a color-coded spreadsheet or something?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065620</id>
	<title>Re:And nothing of value was lost.</title>
	<author>trapnest</author>
	<datestamp>1265625900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...And I didn't speak up, because I was not a 4chan user.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...And I did n't speak up , because I was not a 4chan user .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...And I didn't speak up, because I was not a 4chan user.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064682</id>
	<title>DOOMED I say... DOOMED!</title>
	<author>Q-Hack!</author>
	<datestamp>1265622540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Rules\_Of\_The\_Internet" title="encycloped...matica.com" rel="nofollow">Rules #5, #6, and #7</a> [encycloped...matica.com]</p><p>Verizon, you are doomed.  Pissing off 4chan is probably the worst thing you can do on the Internet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rules # 5 , # 6 , and # 7 [ encycloped...matica.com ] Verizon , you are doomed .
Pissing off 4chan is probably the worst thing you can do on the Internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rules #5, #6, and #7 [encycloped...matica.com]Verizon, you are doomed.
Pissing off 4chan is probably the worst thing you can do on the Internet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064830</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265623080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>you know, I think pedobear is a pretty cool guy.  he molests children and doesn't afraid of anyone.<br><br>(my hobby: mixing memes i'm vaguely aware of when i've never had any contact with the source content anyway)</htmltext>
<tokenext>you know , I think pedobear is a pretty cool guy .
he molests children and does n't afraid of anyone .
( my hobby : mixing memes i 'm vaguely aware of when i 've never had any contact with the source content anyway )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you know, I think pedobear is a pretty cool guy.
he molests children and doesn't afraid of anyone.
(my hobby: mixing memes i'm vaguely aware of when i've never had any contact with the source content anyway)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31087404</id>
	<title>Re:It's for the greater good, people</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265047380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just nine thousand? *phew* that was close!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just nine thousand ?
* phew * that was close !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just nine thousand?
*phew* that was close!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064786</id>
	<title>Re:DOOMED I say... DOOMED!</title>
	<author>the roAm</author>
	<datestamp>1265622900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh yes, Verizon is sooo screwed, one of the largest ISPs in the world might get DDoSed by a hundred retarded people who will actually have the knowhow to DDoS, while thousands of others will wind up downloading trojans that spam 4chan.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yes , Verizon is sooo screwed , one of the largest ISPs in the world might get DDoSed by a hundred retarded people who will actually have the knowhow to DDoS , while thousands of others will wind up downloading trojans that spam 4chan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yes, Verizon is sooo screwed, one of the largest ISPs in the world might get DDoSed by a hundred retarded people who will actually have the knowhow to DDoS, while thousands of others will wind up downloading trojans that spam 4chan.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067014</id>
	<title>Re:Wrong</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1265632140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
<b>YOU DO NOT</b> question the might of slashdot.
</p><p>
Or you may, possibly, be sorry.  A bit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>YOU DO NOT question the might of slashdot .
Or you may , possibly , be sorry .
A bit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
YOU DO NOT question the might of slashdot.
Or you may, possibly, be sorry.
A bit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064854</id>
	<title>Got FIOS here ..and works fine.</title>
	<author>zeil</author>
	<datestamp>1265623140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not sure what all the whining is about as I dont look for underage porn.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not sure what all the whining is about as I dont look for underage porn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not sure what all the whining is about as I dont look for underage porn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065820</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265626620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>4chan is the radio active waste dump of the internet and for the most part all of their shenanigans tend to stay at 4chan, when you close 4chan it spreads.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>4chan is the radio active waste dump of the internet and for the most part all of their shenanigans tend to stay at 4chan , when you close 4chan it spreads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4chan is the radio active waste dump of the internet and for the most part all of their shenanigans tend to stay at 4chan, when you close 4chan it spreads.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064878</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>SilverEyes</author>
	<datestamp>1265623260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>On the other hand, this is 4chan.....</p></div><p>Exactly. 4chan is blocked, and nothing of value was lost.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>On the other hand , this is 4chan.....Exactly .
4chan is blocked , and nothing of value was lost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the other hand, this is 4chan.....Exactly.
4chan is blocked, and nothing of value was lost.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064792</id>
	<title>Works From Here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265622900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was able to connect to boards.4chan.org from a Verizon FiOS connection.</p><p>Sadly, it seems that I have contracted Syphilis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was able to connect to boards.4chan.org from a Verizon FiOS connection.Sadly , it seems that I have contracted Syphilis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was able to connect to boards.4chan.org from a Verizon FiOS connection.Sadly, it seems that I have contracted Syphilis.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064864</id>
	<title>Shame about Verizon</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1265623200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nobody deserves what is going to happen to them.</p><p>Although Verizon kind of does, after its service cancellation shenanigans.</p><p>*grabs popcorn*</p><p>In unrelated news, anybody know what happened to the Church of Scientology?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody deserves what is going to happen to them.Although Verizon kind of does , after its service cancellation shenanigans .
* grabs popcorn * In unrelated news , anybody know what happened to the Church of Scientology ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobody deserves what is going to happen to them.Although Verizon kind of does, after its service cancellation shenanigans.
*grabs popcorn*In unrelated news, anybody know what happened to the Church of Scientology?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065414</id>
	<title>I call for the Streisand effect.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265625240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let the party begin!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let the party begin !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let the party begin!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066666</id>
	<title>4chan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265630400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>My firewall classifies 4chan as Porn.  If Verizon is using a category blocker, it maybe that it is simply classified in a similar way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My firewall classifies 4chan as Porn .
If Verizon is using a category blocker , it maybe that it is simply classified in a similar way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My firewall classifies 4chan as Porn.
If Verizon is using a category blocker, it maybe that it is simply classified in a similar way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066882</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265631420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not all of 4chan is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/b/.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/b/ only exists to keep the retards out of the other boards, which aren't really any worse than nerdy forums elsewhere on the net.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not all of 4chan is /b/ .
/b/ only exists to keep the retards out of the other boards , which are n't really any worse than nerdy forums elsewhere on the net .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not all of 4chan is /b/.
/b/ only exists to keep the retards out of the other boards, which aren't really any worse than nerdy forums elsewhere on the net.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066766</id>
	<title>I think email Port 80 blocked  for STMP</title>
	<author>I\_Voter</author>
	<datestamp>1265630880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have Verizon DSL, and I seem to remember that they block port 80 for pop email.  They claim it is an anti-spam action, and that many email providers do it. That may have something to do with this claimed problem</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have Verizon DSL , and I seem to remember that they block port 80 for pop email .
They claim it is an anti-spam action , and that many email providers do it .
That may have something to do with this claimed problem</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have Verizon DSL, and I seem to remember that they block port 80 for pop email.
They claim it is an anti-spam action, and that many email providers do it.
That may have something to do with this claimed problem</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064804</id>
	<title>I CAN HAZ KITTY PORN?</title>
	<author>tiedyejeremy</author>
	<datestamp>1265622960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>While I don't agree with Verizon on principal, I can see why they might be tempted to block 4chan.  No one wants underage porn on their networks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While I do n't agree with Verizon on principal , I can see why they might be tempted to block 4chan .
No one wants underage porn on their networks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I don't agree with Verizon on principal, I can see why they might be tempted to block 4chan.
No one wants underage porn on their networks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064950</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>harl</author>
	<datestamp>1265623500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Free speech is only free if the speech you hate is free.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Free speech is only free if the speech you hate is free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Free speech is only free if the speech you hate is free.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065218</id>
	<title>Re:has the blocking stopped</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265624520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just opened 4chan's boards on my Motorola Droid over VZW 3G with no problem whatsoever.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:|</p><p>Am I missing something?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just opened 4chan 's boards on my Motorola Droid over VZW 3G with no problem whatsoever .
: | Am I missing something ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just opened 4chan's boards on my Motorola Droid over VZW 3G with no problem whatsoever.
:|Am I missing something?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31085324</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>harl</author>
	<datestamp>1265038200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm slightly insulted that it can't be both.</p><p>It's a variation of what I've felt and heard for ages.  *shrug*  I'm not quoting a specific person it's just yet another iteration of the idea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm slightly insulted that it ca n't be both.It 's a variation of what I 've felt and heard for ages .
* shrug * I 'm not quoting a specific person it 's just yet another iteration of the idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm slightly insulted that it can't be both.It's a variation of what I've felt and heard for ages.
*shrug*  I'm not quoting a specific person it's just yet another iteration of the idea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31072350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065954</id>
	<title>Very little</title>
	<author>Sycraft-fu</author>
	<datestamp>1265627220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Their site got DDoS'd, for which there were arrests made. There was a video made about them, which can be added to the vast pile, and a few protests by people in Guy Fawkes masks. However the "church" (and I use that term lightly) is still going strong and has even sent people to Hatai to preach under the guise of helping.</p><p>All in all, jack and shit happened. Operation Clambake has been far more effective at causing them trouble.</p><p>If that's what 4chan can do, I doubt Verizon is scared. Please remember that DDoS's are more or less ineffective against Tier-1 provider. Their bandwidth is just massive, they ARE the Internet in a very real way. You just can't send enough data to effectively overwhelm their network, you'd overwhelm your own before then. Also they can strike back by simply shutting down ISPs that don't disconnect DDoSer's, effectively banning the ISP from a large portion of the net.</p><p>So I really doubt much happens to Verizon. A DDoS or the like will be ineffective and should the idiots start taking it in to the real world and trying to throw bricks through windows or the like, well they'll quickly discover that is extremely easy to track and the police WILL bust you, especially when there's a big company pressuring them to do so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Their site got DDoS 'd , for which there were arrests made .
There was a video made about them , which can be added to the vast pile , and a few protests by people in Guy Fawkes masks .
However the " church " ( and I use that term lightly ) is still going strong and has even sent people to Hatai to preach under the guise of helping.All in all , jack and shit happened .
Operation Clambake has been far more effective at causing them trouble.If that 's what 4chan can do , I doubt Verizon is scared .
Please remember that DDoS 's are more or less ineffective against Tier-1 provider .
Their bandwidth is just massive , they ARE the Internet in a very real way .
You just ca n't send enough data to effectively overwhelm their network , you 'd overwhelm your own before then .
Also they can strike back by simply shutting down ISPs that do n't disconnect DDoSer 's , effectively banning the ISP from a large portion of the net.So I really doubt much happens to Verizon .
A DDoS or the like will be ineffective and should the idiots start taking it in to the real world and trying to throw bricks through windows or the like , well they 'll quickly discover that is extremely easy to track and the police WILL bust you , especially when there 's a big company pressuring them to do so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their site got DDoS'd, for which there were arrests made.
There was a video made about them, which can be added to the vast pile, and a few protests by people in Guy Fawkes masks.
However the "church" (and I use that term lightly) is still going strong and has even sent people to Hatai to preach under the guise of helping.All in all, jack and shit happened.
Operation Clambake has been far more effective at causing them trouble.If that's what 4chan can do, I doubt Verizon is scared.
Please remember that DDoS's are more or less ineffective against Tier-1 provider.
Their bandwidth is just massive, they ARE the Internet in a very real way.
You just can't send enough data to effectively overwhelm their network, you'd overwhelm your own before then.
Also they can strike back by simply shutting down ISPs that don't disconnect DDoSer's, effectively banning the ISP from a large portion of the net.So I really doubt much happens to Verizon.
A DDoS or the like will be ineffective and should the idiots start taking it in to the real world and trying to throw bricks through windows or the like, well they'll quickly discover that is extremely easy to track and the police WILL bust you, especially when there's a big company pressuring them to do so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068682</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265649300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you know how routing works or are you ignorant? Any high DDOSs are completely null routed meaning no ports no data nothing reaches anything past the null route.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you know how routing works or are you ignorant ?
Any high DDOSs are completely null routed meaning no ports no data nothing reaches anything past the null route .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you know how routing works or are you ignorant?
Any high DDOSs are completely null routed meaning no ports no data nothing reaches anything past the null route.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065798</id>
	<title>Slightly offtopic...</title>
	<author>trapnest</author>
	<datestamp>1265626560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"</p></div><p>I tried to find you but those roads aren't even within a mile of each other...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll meet you at the intersection of " Should be " and " Reality " I tried to find you but those roads are n't even within a mile of each other.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"I tried to find you but those roads aren't even within a mile of each other...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064914</id>
	<title>Re:I CAN HAZ KITTY PORN?</title>
	<author>exley</author>
	<datestamp>1265623380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you don't want that on your network then you don't become an ISP.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you do n't want that on your network then you do n't become an ISP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you don't want that on your network then you don't become an ISP.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066670</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265630400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Obligatory Jon Stewart paraphrase: you do realize that, in the original quote, "they came" is actually an euphanism for "round up and kill," right?<br> <br>You have my word that when the government starts rounding up and mass-murdering 4chan users, I'll speak up.</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obligatory Jon Stewart paraphrase : you do realize that , in the original quote , " they came " is actually an euphanism for " round up and kill , " right ?
You have my word that when the government starts rounding up and mass-murdering 4chan users , I 'll speak up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obligatory Jon Stewart paraphrase: you do realize that, in the original quote, "they came" is actually an euphanism for "round up and kill," right?
You have my word that when the government starts rounding up and mass-murdering 4chan users, I'll speak up.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067076</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265632620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe you can't get to 4chan because you don't have a 4chan Platinum Account?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe you ca n't get to 4chan because you do n't have a 4chan Platinum Account ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe you can't get to 4chan because you don't have a 4chan Platinum Account?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065812</id>
	<title>For the uninitiated...</title>
	<author>mathfeel</author>
	<datestamp>1265626620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can someone illuminate me on why is 4chan so popular. I tried it a few time and it one of the most messy/unorganized message board.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can someone illuminate me on why is 4chan so popular .
I tried it a few time and it one of the most messy/unorganized message board .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can someone illuminate me on why is 4chan so popular.
I tried it a few time and it one of the most messy/unorganized message board.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069026</id>
	<title>Re:it's like freudian psychology</title>
	<author>jack2000</author>
	<datestamp>1265653260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You have me stunned sir. A very good analogy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You have me stunned sir .
A very good analogy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have me stunned sir.
A very good analogy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067414</id>
	<title>If 4chan dies, people will simply chat elsewhere</title>
	<author>Bragador</author>
	<datestamp>1265635140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If 4chan dies, there will be plenty of alternatives out there that will take its place. So don't be fearful of the corporations. They are always too slow to adapt.

<p> <a href="http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/List\_of\_*chan\_boards" title="encycloped...matica.com">http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/List\_of\_*chan\_boards</a> [encycloped...matica.com] </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If 4chan dies , there will be plenty of alternatives out there that will take its place .
So do n't be fearful of the corporations .
They are always too slow to adapt .
http : //www.encyclopediadramatica.com/List \ _of \ _ * chan \ _boards [ encycloped...matica.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If 4chan dies, there will be plenty of alternatives out there that will take its place.
So don't be fearful of the corporations.
They are always too slow to adapt.
http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/List\_of\_*chan\_boards [encycloped...matica.com] </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066398</id>
	<title>Re:Misleading Summary</title>
	<author>Angst Badger</author>
	<datestamp>1265629140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It should be interesting to see the fallout from this. 4channers aren't exactly the paragon of maturity.</p></div><p>I confess that I don't get why Verizon would do this, except possibly cluelessness. While the 4chan crowd certainly overestimates its power, they have many times demonstrated that they can be a serious, long-term pain in the ass. Sure, no one will die, and no great fortunes will be lost, but still... why invite that level of aggravation?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It should be interesting to see the fallout from this .
4channers are n't exactly the paragon of maturity.I confess that I do n't get why Verizon would do this , except possibly cluelessness .
While the 4chan crowd certainly overestimates its power , they have many times demonstrated that they can be a serious , long-term pain in the ass .
Sure , no one will die , and no great fortunes will be lost , but still... why invite that level of aggravation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It should be interesting to see the fallout from this.
4channers aren't exactly the paragon of maturity.I confess that I don't get why Verizon would do this, except possibly cluelessness.
While the 4chan crowd certainly overestimates its power, they have many times demonstrated that they can be a serious, long-term pain in the ass.
Sure, no one will die, and no great fortunes will be lost, but still... why invite that level of aggravation?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065498</id>
	<title>Re:rebellion?</title>
	<author>Kyokugenryu</author>
	<datestamp>1265625540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Once upon a time, 4chan was inhabited by a bunch of nerds who sat around watching anime and posting funny images and some shock images from LUE.  Then, one day, in 2006 or so, someone told someone else that 4chan existed, and it snowballed into this terrible site that exists today.  It's full of nothing but malware, child pornography, and hate speech by 12-14 year olds calling people "newfags" when they've been on the site since 2008.

Most of its original userbase has migrated to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/a/ or offsite entirely because of how terrible that site has become nowadays, and SharpFang is the perfect example of that.  "Attacks" on people/sites/whatever is just stupid, and all these 14 year old internet cool kids have no idea how easy it is to prosecute them for it.

I know the guy who is in jail for the Scientology ddos right now, he used to hang out in the same IRCs I do, and he was around about a week before the conviction.  Needless to say, he wishes he had never even found 4chan.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Once upon a time , 4chan was inhabited by a bunch of nerds who sat around watching anime and posting funny images and some shock images from LUE .
Then , one day , in 2006 or so , someone told someone else that 4chan existed , and it snowballed into this terrible site that exists today .
It 's full of nothing but malware , child pornography , and hate speech by 12-14 year olds calling people " newfags " when they 've been on the site since 2008 .
Most of its original userbase has migrated to /a/ or offsite entirely because of how terrible that site has become nowadays , and SharpFang is the perfect example of that .
" Attacks " on people/sites/whatever is just stupid , and all these 14 year old internet cool kids have no idea how easy it is to prosecute them for it .
I know the guy who is in jail for the Scientology ddos right now , he used to hang out in the same IRCs I do , and he was around about a week before the conviction .
Needless to say , he wishes he had never even found 4chan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once upon a time, 4chan was inhabited by a bunch of nerds who sat around watching anime and posting funny images and some shock images from LUE.
Then, one day, in 2006 or so, someone told someone else that 4chan existed, and it snowballed into this terrible site that exists today.
It's full of nothing but malware, child pornography, and hate speech by 12-14 year olds calling people "newfags" when they've been on the site since 2008.
Most of its original userbase has migrated to /a/ or offsite entirely because of how terrible that site has become nowadays, and SharpFang is the perfect example of that.
"Attacks" on people/sites/whatever is just stupid, and all these 14 year old internet cool kids have no idea how easy it is to prosecute them for it.
I know the guy who is in jail for the Scientology ddos right now, he used to hang out in the same IRCs I do, and he was around about a week before the conviction.
Needless to say, he wishes he had never even found 4chan.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31072204</id>
	<title>Problem's solved, Verizon will unblock 4chan.</title>
	<author>DaVince21</author>
	<datestamp>1265731860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the 4chan status blog:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Verizon should be unblocking boards.4chan.org later tonight.</p><p>I'll post a more detailed explanation tomorrow, but the issue is similar to the one we had with AT&amp;T last year.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the 4chan status blog : Verizon should be unblocking boards.4chan.org later tonight.I 'll post a more detailed explanation tomorrow , but the issue is similar to the one we had with AT&amp;T last year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the 4chan status blog:Verizon should be unblocking boards.4chan.org later tonight.I'll post a more detailed explanation tomorrow, but the issue is similar to the one we had with AT&amp;T last year.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065846</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>StillNeedMoreCoffee</author>
	<datestamp>1265626740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well lets not forget the speach you love and the speach you are so, so about and the speach you fall asleep to. Lets not limit it to the speach you hate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well lets not forget the speach you love and the speach you are so , so about and the speach you fall asleep to .
Lets not limit it to the speach you hate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well lets not forget the speach you love and the speach you are so, so about and the speach you fall asleep to.
Lets not limit it to the speach you hate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068678</id>
	<title>4chan is... slashdot is...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265649240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdont is a communal blog ran by a dozen or so seemingly incompetent authors. Intriguingly enough, there was a day when slashdot was regarded as a relevant, respected nerd site with plenty of interesting and useful items. Now it seems the editor's major role is to find news articles from other sites that will generate huge amounts of comments resulting in, of course, more page views to sell advertising. Present-day slashdot is simply another shitty site, not unlike livejournal, with the caliber of a group of fatties with Assburger Syndrome. Slashdot is the largest home on the internets for trolls and whores (see trolltalk).<br>Note: do not try to find slashfic on slashdot<br>Contents [hide]<br>1 Users on slashdot<br>2 Articles on slashdot<br>2.1 Examples of Idiocy<br>3 Moderation System<br>3.1 Problems with moderation system<br>3.2 Admins<br>4 Whacking it to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.<br>5 Noteworthy slashdot personalities<br>6 Slashdot trolling<br>7 Tips<br>8 Compare against<br>9 See also<br>10 External links<br>Users on slashdot</p><p>Typical slashdot user.<br>99\% of slashdot users have been self-diagnosed as suffering from Asperger's Syndrome, many with comorbid USI or other disorders. Most slashdot users consider themselves "smart," when in fact they are simply of average intelligence but have more free time and fat egos. This can be seen in the forums, where spelling and usage errors are prevalent in condescending, arrogant rants, identified by containing the phrase "people are stupid" at some point in the post.<br>The majority of slashdot's userbase is composed of fat, white, goateed cubicle-shit. Statistically, a "slash-bot" is much more likely to spend his whole life being as unpopular as he was in high-school. The facts directly contradict the typical nerd comeuppance fantasy, where the awkward and unattractive grow up to rule the world, and their popular, seemingly "less intelligent" tormentors wind up pregnant, in prison or selling shoes at the mall. In reality, the bullies wind up in college on sports scholarships, and go on to study economics, law or at least sociology. Nerds tend to have poor job prospects: their skill sets frequently clash with market realities (for every Bill Gates there exist thousands of Best-Buy lifers), and their social lives dismally revolve around their junior-college anime club, wearing stupid costumes, and a monogamous relationship with a fat bitch. Nine out of ten slashdot users will contend with structural unemployment and degrading service-sector jobs for the rest of their lives. The other one will see the light and join the GNAA out of sheer frustration from the idiocy the Slashdot culture exhibits.<br>Articles on slashdot</p><p>Each new article provides a follow-up forum where Slashdot users can provide their own commentary. When slashdot was smaller and populated by the elite, the forums were self-moderated. As time went on, slashdot attracted a much younger and lower educated set of readers in addition to its original core. Because of the sheer volume of posts and the complete ease with which a troll could dominate a forum, slashdot started a moderation system to rate comments and associate those with slashdot users.<br>Examples of Idiocy<br>Articles like this and this are the reason slashdot is no longer taken seriously.<br>Moderation System</p><p>The Slashot moderation system was designed to raise good posts and denigrate poor ones. Its simplicity has been its downfall. It has been mostly successful at removing first post and crap floods, but rather than discourage trolling, it has elevated it to an art form. By relying on a point system (named, without irony, "karma") it provides a built-in scoring mechanism. A comments karma score can range from -1 to +5. Competing trolls can grade themselves as easily as a baseball game.<br>Problems with moderation system<br>Whores are more common on slashdot than trolls. The communal nature of granting and removing karma by the users is anti-authoritative and actively discourages people with real knowledge about a subject from discuss</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdont is a communal blog ran by a dozen or so seemingly incompetent authors .
Intriguingly enough , there was a day when slashdot was regarded as a relevant , respected nerd site with plenty of interesting and useful items .
Now it seems the editor 's major role is to find news articles from other sites that will generate huge amounts of comments resulting in , of course , more page views to sell advertising .
Present-day slashdot is simply another shitty site , not unlike livejournal , with the caliber of a group of fatties with Assburger Syndrome .
Slashdot is the largest home on the internets for trolls and whores ( see trolltalk ) .Note : do not try to find slashfic on slashdotContents [ hide ] 1 Users on slashdot2 Articles on slashdot2.1 Examples of Idiocy3 Moderation System3.1 Problems with moderation system3.2 Admins4 Whacking it to /.5 Noteworthy slashdot personalities6 Slashdot trolling7 Tips8 Compare against9 See also10 External linksUsers on slashdotTypical slashdot user.99 \ % of slashdot users have been self-diagnosed as suffering from Asperger 's Syndrome , many with comorbid USI or other disorders .
Most slashdot users consider themselves " smart , " when in fact they are simply of average intelligence but have more free time and fat egos .
This can be seen in the forums , where spelling and usage errors are prevalent in condescending , arrogant rants , identified by containing the phrase " people are stupid " at some point in the post.The majority of slashdot 's userbase is composed of fat , white , goateed cubicle-shit .
Statistically , a " slash-bot " is much more likely to spend his whole life being as unpopular as he was in high-school .
The facts directly contradict the typical nerd comeuppance fantasy , where the awkward and unattractive grow up to rule the world , and their popular , seemingly " less intelligent " tormentors wind up pregnant , in prison or selling shoes at the mall .
In reality , the bullies wind up in college on sports scholarships , and go on to study economics , law or at least sociology .
Nerds tend to have poor job prospects : their skill sets frequently clash with market realities ( for every Bill Gates there exist thousands of Best-Buy lifers ) , and their social lives dismally revolve around their junior-college anime club , wearing stupid costumes , and a monogamous relationship with a fat bitch .
Nine out of ten slashdot users will contend with structural unemployment and degrading service-sector jobs for the rest of their lives .
The other one will see the light and join the GNAA out of sheer frustration from the idiocy the Slashdot culture exhibits.Articles on slashdotEach new article provides a follow-up forum where Slashdot users can provide their own commentary .
When slashdot was smaller and populated by the elite , the forums were self-moderated .
As time went on , slashdot attracted a much younger and lower educated set of readers in addition to its original core .
Because of the sheer volume of posts and the complete ease with which a troll could dominate a forum , slashdot started a moderation system to rate comments and associate those with slashdot users.Examples of IdiocyArticles like this and this are the reason slashdot is no longer taken seriously.Moderation SystemThe Slashot moderation system was designed to raise good posts and denigrate poor ones .
Its simplicity has been its downfall .
It has been mostly successful at removing first post and crap floods , but rather than discourage trolling , it has elevated it to an art form .
By relying on a point system ( named , without irony , " karma " ) it provides a built-in scoring mechanism .
A comments karma score can range from -1 to + 5 .
Competing trolls can grade themselves as easily as a baseball game.Problems with moderation systemWhores are more common on slashdot than trolls .
The communal nature of granting and removing karma by the users is anti-authoritative and actively discourages people with real knowledge about a subject from discuss</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdont is a communal blog ran by a dozen or so seemingly incompetent authors.
Intriguingly enough, there was a day when slashdot was regarded as a relevant, respected nerd site with plenty of interesting and useful items.
Now it seems the editor's major role is to find news articles from other sites that will generate huge amounts of comments resulting in, of course, more page views to sell advertising.
Present-day slashdot is simply another shitty site, not unlike livejournal, with the caliber of a group of fatties with Assburger Syndrome.
Slashdot is the largest home on the internets for trolls and whores (see trolltalk).Note: do not try to find slashfic on slashdotContents [hide]1 Users on slashdot2 Articles on slashdot2.1 Examples of Idiocy3 Moderation System3.1 Problems with moderation system3.2 Admins4 Whacking it to /.5 Noteworthy slashdot personalities6 Slashdot trolling7 Tips8 Compare against9 See also10 External linksUsers on slashdotTypical slashdot user.99\% of slashdot users have been self-diagnosed as suffering from Asperger's Syndrome, many with comorbid USI or other disorders.
Most slashdot users consider themselves "smart," when in fact they are simply of average intelligence but have more free time and fat egos.
This can be seen in the forums, where spelling and usage errors are prevalent in condescending, arrogant rants, identified by containing the phrase "people are stupid" at some point in the post.The majority of slashdot's userbase is composed of fat, white, goateed cubicle-shit.
Statistically, a "slash-bot" is much more likely to spend his whole life being as unpopular as he was in high-school.
The facts directly contradict the typical nerd comeuppance fantasy, where the awkward and unattractive grow up to rule the world, and their popular, seemingly "less intelligent" tormentors wind up pregnant, in prison or selling shoes at the mall.
In reality, the bullies wind up in college on sports scholarships, and go on to study economics, law or at least sociology.
Nerds tend to have poor job prospects: their skill sets frequently clash with market realities (for every Bill Gates there exist thousands of Best-Buy lifers), and their social lives dismally revolve around their junior-college anime club, wearing stupid costumes, and a monogamous relationship with a fat bitch.
Nine out of ten slashdot users will contend with structural unemployment and degrading service-sector jobs for the rest of their lives.
The other one will see the light and join the GNAA out of sheer frustration from the idiocy the Slashdot culture exhibits.Articles on slashdotEach new article provides a follow-up forum where Slashdot users can provide their own commentary.
When slashdot was smaller and populated by the elite, the forums were self-moderated.
As time went on, slashdot attracted a much younger and lower educated set of readers in addition to its original core.
Because of the sheer volume of posts and the complete ease with which a troll could dominate a forum, slashdot started a moderation system to rate comments and associate those with slashdot users.Examples of IdiocyArticles like this and this are the reason slashdot is no longer taken seriously.Moderation SystemThe Slashot moderation system was designed to raise good posts and denigrate poor ones.
Its simplicity has been its downfall.
It has been mostly successful at removing first post and crap floods, but rather than discourage trolling, it has elevated it to an art form.
By relying on a point system (named, without irony, "karma") it provides a built-in scoring mechanism.
A comments karma score can range from -1 to +5.
Competing trolls can grade themselves as easily as a baseball game.Problems with moderation systemWhores are more common on slashdot than trolls.
The communal nature of granting and removing karma by the users is anti-authoritative and actively discourages people with real knowledge about a subject from discuss</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31081534</id>
	<title>Re:I feel split in this matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265730420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>did they say DDOS or just DOS attack?  There is a difference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>did they say DDOS or just DOS attack ?
There is a difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>did they say DDOS or just DOS attack?
There is a difference.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065098</id>
	<title>Working 4hrs ago</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265624100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have verizon fios and was on the photography &amp; wallpaper boards just this morning.  I'm wondering if the ban is only for the 18+ boards?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have verizon fios and was on the photography &amp; wallpaper boards just this morning .
I 'm wondering if the ban is only for the 18 + boards ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have verizon fios and was on the photography &amp; wallpaper boards just this morning.
I'm wondering if the ban is only for the 18+ boards?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064942</id>
	<title>Works for me on the Droid.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265623440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have no problems viewing 4chan on the Verizon network.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have no problems viewing 4chan on the Verizon network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have no problems viewing 4chan on the Verizon network.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064892
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066334
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31071016
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065528
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069500
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065260
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065532
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31087404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067160
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31072992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31072350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31085324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064914
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065202
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064926
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31081534
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066352
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_1751217_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069518
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065058
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066840
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065498
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068420
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065608
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065460
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064858
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068186
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31087404
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064764
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064878
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065820
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065114
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066670
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069500
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069964
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31072992
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069518
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067070
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065996
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066456
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066306
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064982
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069368
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066038
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065942
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068682
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31081534
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068840
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064950
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066690
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31072350
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31085324
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065532
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065846
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067996
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067094
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065948
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064824
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065620
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066334
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065260
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064914
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31068648
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065170
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065244
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064844
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065094
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065122
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067414
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069896
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065196
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064854
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065102
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064814
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065854
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065742
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065250
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065954
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31066352
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31071016
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065924
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064870
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31067014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065798
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31069026
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31064786
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_1751217.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_1751217.31065950
</commentlist>
</conversation>
