<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_06_161202</id>
	<title>Internet Nominated For 2010 Nobel Peace Prize</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1265477100000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"It's official. The Internet, which has virtually revolutionized world communication, has been <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/world/europe/articles/2010/02/02/internet\_among\_nobel\_peace\_prize\_nominees/">nominated for the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize</a>. 'Organizers said signatories to its petition backing the nomination include 2003 peace laureate and exiled Iranian activist Shirin Ebadi &mdash; which would make it a legitimate entry.' The nomination was <a href="http://www.wired.com/underwire/2009/11/internet-for-peace-nobel/">proposed by the Italian edition of Wired magazine</a> for promoting 'dialogue, debate and consensus through communication' as well as democracy."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " It 's official .
The Internet , which has virtually revolutionized world communication , has been nominated for the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize .
'Organizers said signatories to its petition backing the nomination include 2003 peace laureate and exiled Iranian activist Shirin Ebadi    which would make it a legitimate entry .
' The nomination was proposed by the Italian edition of Wired magazine for promoting 'dialogue , debate and consensus through communication ' as well as democracy .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "It's official.
The Internet, which has virtually revolutionized world communication, has been nominated for the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize.
'Organizers said signatories to its petition backing the nomination include 2003 peace laureate and exiled Iranian activist Shirin Ebadi — which would make it a legitimate entry.
' The nomination was proposed by the Italian edition of Wired magazine for promoting 'dialogue, debate and consensus through communication' as well as democracy.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047306</id>
	<title>Re:Fail</title>
	<author>ildon</author>
	<datestamp>1265488200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Forget that... I want "None of the Above" to win the award.</p></div></blockquote><p>That guy already won it in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohandas\_Karamchand\_Gandhi#Awards" title="wikipedia.org">1948.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Forget that... I want " None of the Above " to win the award.That guy already won it in 1948 .
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forget that... I want "None of the Above" to win the award.That guy already won it in 1948.
[wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046846</id>
	<title>Re:Fail</title>
	<author>LockeOnLogic</author>
	<datestamp>1265483760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>All the examples you list are either broadcast or point to point communication. The internet is an evolution of these technologies that allows for both kinds of communication at a low cost of entry for billions. Not the greatest thing in mass communication in the last 100 years? A large and rapidly growing number of the population of this planet has the capacity to instantly communicate regardless of geographical location. It seems magical by comparison to communication technology of the past. <br> <br> As for government control, having a million ants running around with megaphones is alot harder to stop (or control) than a few centralized points of broadcast. Look at the recent political turmoil is Iran as an example of a repressive state having alot harder time silencing it's populace than it would have twenty/thirty years ago.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All the examples you list are either broadcast or point to point communication .
The internet is an evolution of these technologies that allows for both kinds of communication at a low cost of entry for billions .
Not the greatest thing in mass communication in the last 100 years ?
A large and rapidly growing number of the population of this planet has the capacity to instantly communicate regardless of geographical location .
It seems magical by comparison to communication technology of the past .
As for government control , having a million ants running around with megaphones is alot harder to stop ( or control ) than a few centralized points of broadcast .
Look at the recent political turmoil is Iran as an example of a repressive state having alot harder time silencing it 's populace than it would have twenty/thirty years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the examples you list are either broadcast or point to point communication.
The internet is an evolution of these technologies that allows for both kinds of communication at a low cost of entry for billions.
Not the greatest thing in mass communication in the last 100 years?
A large and rapidly growing number of the population of this planet has the capacity to instantly communicate regardless of geographical location.
It seems magical by comparison to communication technology of the past.
As for government control, having a million ants running around with megaphones is alot harder to stop (or control) than a few centralized points of broadcast.
Look at the recent political turmoil is Iran as an example of a repressive state having alot harder time silencing it's populace than it would have twenty/thirty years ago.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046776</id>
	<title>Re:Tim Berners-Lee</title>
	<author>raddan</author>
	<datestamp>1265483280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can't award a Peace Prize to Berners-Lee: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim\_Berners-Lee" title="wikipedia.org">he's a knight</a> [wikipedia.org]!  Didn't you know?  He didn't just beat Gopher-- he slew it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't award a Peace Prize to Berners-Lee : he 's a knight [ wikipedia.org ] !
Did n't you know ?
He did n't just beat Gopher-- he slew it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't award a Peace Prize to Berners-Lee: he's a knight [wikipedia.org]!
Didn't you know?
He didn't just beat Gopher-- he slew it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048184</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>skuzzlebutt</author>
	<datestamp>1265453700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the Nobel committee gets 419'd, I will never, ever stop laughing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the Nobel committee gets 419 'd , I will never , ever stop laughing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the Nobel committee gets 419'd, I will never, ever stop laughing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049810</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1265470680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It isn't even the year of Tux on the desktop, so how can we even hope to get him on the internet?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is n't even the year of Tux on the desktop , so how can we even hope to get him on the internet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It isn't even the year of Tux on the desktop, so how can we even hope to get him on the internet?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046946</id>
	<title>Re:darpa</title>
	<author>santax</author>
	<datestamp>1265484780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know, there is way to much truth in what you are saying. See that van outside? With that guy in black? Thats me. Please step out of your house sir and approach me with your hands where I can see them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , there is way to much truth in what you are saying .
See that van outside ?
With that guy in black ?
Thats me .
Please step out of your house sir and approach me with your hands where I can see them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, there is way to much truth in what you are saying.
See that van outside?
With that guy in black?
Thats me.
Please step out of your house sir and approach me with your hands where I can see them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048100</id>
	<title>they're out of their cotton-picking minds!</title>
	<author>Paracelcus</author>
	<datestamp>1265452800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A THING is winning the Nobel prize?<br>I guess it makes as much sense as Obama's winning it, and what did the Prez do to deserve it?<br>IMHO Obama won the prize for being the first black US president &amp; for being "anybody but Bush".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A THING is winning the Nobel prize ? I guess it makes as much sense as Obama 's winning it , and what did the Prez do to deserve it ? IMHO Obama won the prize for being the first black US president &amp; for being " anybody but Bush " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A THING is winning the Nobel prize?I guess it makes as much sense as Obama's winning it, and what did the Prez do to deserve it?IMHO Obama won the prize for being the first black US president &amp; for being "anybody but Bush".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049264</id>
	<title>"We" accept.</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1265463540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>on behalf of "us" on the internet, which constitutes all the "people" in "we, the people", "we" accept.</p><p>it was long overdue anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>on behalf of " us " on the internet , which constitutes all the " people " in " we , the people " , " we " accept.it was long overdue anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>on behalf of "us" on the internet, which constitutes all the "people" in "we, the people", "we" accept.it was long overdue anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047564</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265447520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>After which the loch ness monster and yeti will conspire with the third JFK shooter on the grassy knoll and make their devious plan to take over the world...</htmltext>
<tokenext>After which the loch ness monster and yeti will conspire with the third JFK shooter on the grassy knoll and make their devious plan to take over the world.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After which the loch ness monster and yeti will conspire with the third JFK shooter on the grassy knoll and make their devious plan to take over the world...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</id>
	<title>Soo....</title>
	<author>nine-times</author>
	<datestamp>1265480820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>who would get the cash prize?  Please don't tell me it's "anonymous".  I hate that guy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>who would get the cash prize ?
Please do n't tell me it 's " anonymous " .
I hate that guy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>who would get the cash prize?
Please don't tell me it's "anonymous".
I hate that guy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048558</id>
	<title>Ironically I fully agree with this one</title>
	<author>Pecisk</author>
	<datestamp>1265457060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, Internet maybe is a mess, full of useless web, pr0n, even radical entities who calls for killing people because of race/religion/conditions/etc. But, in same time, it's wonderful media to help people in Iran to spread the truth about what's going on here, to help people in Haiti with all great web projects which (I really hope) helped rescuers on the ground (accidents report, map crowdsourcing from satphotos and info from the ground, etc.). For each useless and oxygen-waste sales-man who tries to spam every mail box I see young and older people who are really excited about posibilites of the Net - and they actually do and use it for what they intended it for - exchange information. OpenStreetMap, Wikipedia, even Slashdot - it all encourages exchange of ideas, of information. Maybe we even disagree strongly with each other, but we are seeking peace, because we are talking.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , Internet maybe is a mess , full of useless web , pr0n , even radical entities who calls for killing people because of race/religion/conditions/etc .
But , in same time , it 's wonderful media to help people in Iran to spread the truth about what 's going on here , to help people in Haiti with all great web projects which ( I really hope ) helped rescuers on the ground ( accidents report , map crowdsourcing from satphotos and info from the ground , etc. ) .
For each useless and oxygen-waste sales-man who tries to spam every mail box I see young and older people who are really excited about posibilites of the Net - and they actually do and use it for what they intended it for - exchange information .
OpenStreetMap , Wikipedia , even Slashdot - it all encourages exchange of ideas , of information .
Maybe we even disagree strongly with each other , but we are seeking peace , because we are talking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, Internet maybe is a mess, full of useless web, pr0n, even radical entities who calls for killing people because of race/religion/conditions/etc.
But, in same time, it's wonderful media to help people in Iran to spread the truth about what's going on here, to help people in Haiti with all great web projects which (I really hope) helped rescuers on the ground (accidents report, map crowdsourcing from satphotos and info from the ground, etc.).
For each useless and oxygen-waste sales-man who tries to spam every mail box I see young and older people who are really excited about posibilites of the Net - and they actually do and use it for what they intended it for - exchange information.
OpenStreetMap, Wikipedia, even Slashdot - it all encourages exchange of ideas, of information.
Maybe we even disagree strongly with each other, but we are seeking peace, because we are talking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047504</id>
	<title>Re:I hate that guy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265447100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I aint do nofink!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I aint do nofink !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I aint do nofink!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31050248</id>
	<title>I think if it wins...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265476140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The acceptance speech should be done by 4chan.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The acceptance speech should be done by 4chan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The acceptance speech should be done by 4chan.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047144</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>khallow</author>
	<datestamp>1265486640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Eh. How will the money go where the Nobel Prize Committee wants it to go? A lot, if not all, of these countries don't have the infrastructure to make sure money goes where it is supposed to go. That's a huge part of the reason they are still poor.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Eh .
How will the money go where the Nobel Prize Committee wants it to go ?
A lot , if not all , of these countries do n't have the infrastructure to make sure money goes where it is supposed to go .
That 's a huge part of the reason they are still poor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eh.
How will the money go where the Nobel Prize Committee wants it to go?
A lot, if not all, of these countries don't have the infrastructure to make sure money goes where it is supposed to go.
That's a huge part of the reason they are still poor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046780</id>
	<title>Precedent</title>
	<author>nsayer</author>
	<datestamp>1265483280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is a precedent for Nobel prizes to other than natural persons, and for the prize to not be awarded in a particular year. There's no reason they couldn't allocate the prize money back into the prize fund (like they did in 1972) while issuing a proclamation praising the Internet for whatever they like.</p><p>The alternative would be to award the prize to DARPA, which is probably not really in keeping with the spirit of the award.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a precedent for Nobel prizes to other than natural persons , and for the prize to not be awarded in a particular year .
There 's no reason they could n't allocate the prize money back into the prize fund ( like they did in 1972 ) while issuing a proclamation praising the Internet for whatever they like.The alternative would be to award the prize to DARPA , which is probably not really in keeping with the spirit of the award .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a precedent for Nobel prizes to other than natural persons, and for the prize to not be awarded in a particular year.
There's no reason they couldn't allocate the prize money back into the prize fund (like they did in 1972) while issuing a proclamation praising the Internet for whatever they like.The alternative would be to award the prize to DARPA, which is probably not really in keeping with the spirit of the award.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046580</id>
	<title>People not things.</title>
	<author>Faux\_Pseudo</author>
	<datestamp>1265481600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about we nominate the guy from all those stories about the 40th aniversery of the internet that we had to listen to in October?  Can't remember his name but he worked at DARPA and got tired of having to change seats every time he wanted to use a different computer and was also tired of not being able have two computers in two different parts of the country talk to eachother instead of having to type things over and over again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about we nominate the guy from all those stories about the 40th aniversery of the internet that we had to listen to in October ?
Ca n't remember his name but he worked at DARPA and got tired of having to change seats every time he wanted to use a different computer and was also tired of not being able have two computers in two different parts of the country talk to eachother instead of having to type things over and over again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about we nominate the guy from all those stories about the 40th aniversery of the internet that we had to listen to in October?
Can't remember his name but he worked at DARPA and got tired of having to change seats every time he wanted to use a different computer and was also tired of not being able have two computers in two different parts of the country talk to eachother instead of having to type things over and over again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048982</id>
	<title>Evolution of politics</title>
	<author>ElusiveJoe</author>
	<datestamp>1265461200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pre-Industrial Society:   I don't even bother rebelling anymore<br>Industrial Society:         I don't even bother voting anymore<br>Post-Industrial Society: I don't even bother clicking anymore</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pre-Industrial Society : I do n't even bother rebelling anymoreIndustrial Society : I do n't even bother voting anymorePost-Industrial Society : I do n't even bother clicking anymore</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pre-Industrial Society:   I don't even bother rebelling anymoreIndustrial Society:         I don't even bother voting anymorePost-Industrial Society: I don't even bother clicking anymore</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046870</id>
	<title>Re:Fail</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265484000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To compare just the sheer amount and types of information available on the internet to the telegraph is to really minimize the scope of change the internet has brought. It's a frickin' <i>living</i> Library of Alexandria.</p><p>And I'd be quick to point out we are only really in year 25 (for popular usage) of this internet thingy. Give it as much time as the gutenburg press and see what the real effect is.</p><p>One of the side effects of police states is that everything is monitored. The tool is neutral. And we can impliment it any way we see fit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To compare just the sheer amount and types of information available on the internet to the telegraph is to really minimize the scope of change the internet has brought .
It 's a frickin ' living Library of Alexandria.And I 'd be quick to point out we are only really in year 25 ( for popular usage ) of this internet thingy .
Give it as much time as the gutenburg press and see what the real effect is.One of the side effects of police states is that everything is monitored .
The tool is neutral .
And we can impliment it any way we see fit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To compare just the sheer amount and types of information available on the internet to the telegraph is to really minimize the scope of change the internet has brought.
It's a frickin' living Library of Alexandria.And I'd be quick to point out we are only really in year 25 (for popular usage) of this internet thingy.
Give it as much time as the gutenburg press and see what the real effect is.One of the side effects of police states is that everything is monitored.
The tool is neutral.
And we can impliment it any way we see fit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048822</id>
	<title>Bill Gates should get one too</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1265459760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For his vast financial contributions to charity and the effort he is putting into focusing it.  His example has inspired other "new money" to be more charitable too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For his vast financial contributions to charity and the effort he is putting into focusing it .
His example has inspired other " new money " to be more charitable too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For his vast financial contributions to charity and the effort he is putting into focusing it.
His example has inspired other "new money" to be more charitable too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046828</id>
	<title>Re:Tim Berners-Lee</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265483640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would second this nomination. Berners-Lee is a \_real\_ person that did something \_real\_. There is no nobel prize for engineering/technology(the closest is the <a href="http://www.draperprize.org/" title="draperprize.org" rel="nofollow">Draper prize</a> [draperprize.org]). It is utterly appropriate that engineering efforts that contribute to world peace should be recognized via the Peace Prize. I think that what Berners-Lee did is a much greater contribution to world peace than some of the politician winners of the Peace Prize.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would second this nomination .
Berners-Lee is a \ _real \ _ person that did something \ _real \ _ .
There is no nobel prize for engineering/technology ( the closest is the Draper prize [ draperprize.org ] ) .
It is utterly appropriate that engineering efforts that contribute to world peace should be recognized via the Peace Prize .
I think that what Berners-Lee did is a much greater contribution to world peace than some of the politician winners of the Peace Prize .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would second this nomination.
Berners-Lee is a \_real\_ person that did something \_real\_.
There is no nobel prize for engineering/technology(the closest is the Draper prize [draperprize.org]).
It is utterly appropriate that engineering efforts that contribute to world peace should be recognized via the Peace Prize.
I think that what Berners-Lee did is a much greater contribution to world peace than some of the politician winners of the Peace Prize.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046980</id>
	<title>Re:Tim Berners-Lee</title>
	<author>AmazinglySmooth</author>
	<datestamp>1265485020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about Claude Shannon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude\_E.\_Shannon)?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about Claude Shannon ( http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude \ _E. \ _Shannon ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about Claude Shannon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude\_E.\_Shannon)?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046938</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265484720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course it will. Right to the 4chan community account for madness and mayhem.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p><p>No, just kidding. Reality will be far worse. Al Gore will try to claim it. But in reality, some previously unknown US (!) government agency will take it, and trough some funding program &ldquo;for protection of rights on the Internet&rdquo;, will give the money to a RIAA/MPAA joint-venture project to create a &ldquo;copyright cybersoldier&rdquo; unit with NSA-like powers. Then trough an ACTA addition, that unit will get the power to &ldquo;catch&rdquo; anyone, anywhere, in any country of the world, without any basic human rights being applicable.</p><p>I think Anonymous is the better option here...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course it will .
Right to the 4chan community account for madness and mayhem .
: DNo , just kidding .
Reality will be far worse .
Al Gore will try to claim it .
But in reality , some previously unknown US ( !
) government agency will take it , and trough some funding program    for protection of rights on the Internet    , will give the money to a RIAA/MPAA joint-venture project to create a    copyright cybersoldier    unit with NSA-like powers .
Then trough an ACTA addition , that unit will get the power to    catch    anyone , anywhere , in any country of the world , without any basic human rights being applicable.I think Anonymous is the better option here.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course it will.
Right to the 4chan community account for madness and mayhem.
:DNo, just kidding.
Reality will be far worse.
Al Gore will try to claim it.
But in reality, some previously unknown US (!
) government agency will take it, and trough some funding program “for protection of rights on the Internet”, will give the money to a RIAA/MPAA joint-venture project to create a “copyright cybersoldier” unit with NSA-like powers.
Then trough an ACTA addition, that unit will get the power to “catch” anyone, anywhere, in any country of the world, without any basic human rights being applicable.I think Anonymous is the better option here...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046924</id>
	<title>Legitimate entry? Not according to Nobel's will...</title>
	<author>LockeOnLogic</author>
	<datestamp>1265484600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Excerpt from the will of Alfred Nobel (emphasis added): "...divided into five equal parts, which shall be apportioned as follows: one part to the PERSON who shall have made the most important discovery or invention within the field of physics; one part to the PERSON who shall have made the most important chemical discovery or improvement; one part to the PERSON who shall have made the most important discovery within the domain of physiology or medicine; one part to the PERSON who shall have produced in the field of literature the most outstanding work in an ideal direction; and one part to the PERSON who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."<br> <br> This nomination of an object clearly goes against the founders intent. Are we going to aware the physics prize to the LHC someday?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Excerpt from the will of Alfred Nobel ( emphasis added ) : " ...divided into five equal parts , which shall be apportioned as follows : one part to the PERSON who shall have made the most important discovery or invention within the field of physics ; one part to the PERSON who shall have made the most important chemical discovery or improvement ; one part to the PERSON who shall have made the most important discovery within the domain of physiology or medicine ; one part to the PERSON who shall have produced in the field of literature the most outstanding work in an ideal direction ; and one part to the PERSON who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations , for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses .
" This nomination of an object clearly goes against the founders intent .
Are we going to aware the physics prize to the LHC someday ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Excerpt from the will of Alfred Nobel (emphasis added): "...divided into five equal parts, which shall be apportioned as follows: one part to the PERSON who shall have made the most important discovery or invention within the field of physics; one part to the PERSON who shall have made the most important chemical discovery or improvement; one part to the PERSON who shall have made the most important discovery within the domain of physiology or medicine; one part to the PERSON who shall have produced in the field of literature the most outstanding work in an ideal direction; and one part to the PERSON who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.
"  This nomination of an object clearly goes against the founders intent.
Are we going to aware the physics prize to the LHC someday?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554</id>
	<title>Fail</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265481360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The Internet, which has virtually revolutionized world communication, has been nominated for the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize.</p></div><p>Yeah, okay... How come the telegraph isn't being nominated? It was the first time people on different continents started talking to each other in real-time. Or radio for that matter. The internet is not the greatest thing in the past hundred years of mass communications; The gutenburg press did more to free the masses from tyranny. If anything, the internet may make the problem worse: one of the side-effects of digitalization is that everything can be tracked, monitored, and recorded in perpetuity. The government doesn't concern itself with <i>how</i> to spy on its citizens... it's busy trying to figure out what to do with all this data. And we want to nominate this for a Nobel Prize?</p><p>Forget that... I want "None of the Above" to win the award.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Internet , which has virtually revolutionized world communication , has been nominated for the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize.Yeah , okay... How come the telegraph is n't being nominated ?
It was the first time people on different continents started talking to each other in real-time .
Or radio for that matter .
The internet is not the greatest thing in the past hundred years of mass communications ; The gutenburg press did more to free the masses from tyranny .
If anything , the internet may make the problem worse : one of the side-effects of digitalization is that everything can be tracked , monitored , and recorded in perpetuity .
The government does n't concern itself with how to spy on its citizens... it 's busy trying to figure out what to do with all this data .
And we want to nominate this for a Nobel Prize ? Forget that... I want " None of the Above " to win the award .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Internet, which has virtually revolutionized world communication, has been nominated for the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize.Yeah, okay... How come the telegraph isn't being nominated?
It was the first time people on different continents started talking to each other in real-time.
Or radio for that matter.
The internet is not the greatest thing in the past hundred years of mass communications; The gutenburg press did more to free the masses from tyranny.
If anything, the internet may make the problem worse: one of the side-effects of digitalization is that everything can be tracked, monitored, and recorded in perpetuity.
The government doesn't concern itself with how to spy on its citizens... it's busy trying to figure out what to do with all this data.
And we want to nominate this for a Nobel Prize?Forget that... I want "None of the Above" to win the award.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047786</id>
	<title>Better nominee</title>
	<author>sictransitgloriacfa</author>
	<datestamp>1265449380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Internet is very nice, but I would prefer that they award the prize to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liu\_Xiaobo" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Liu Xiaobo</a> [wikipedia.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Internet is very nice , but I would prefer that they award the prize to Liu Xiaobo [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Internet is very nice, but I would prefer that they award the prize to Liu Xiaobo [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049666</id>
	<title>Re:Fail</title>
	<author>TBoon</author>
	<datestamp>1265468220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yeah, okay... How come the telegraph isn't being nominated? [...] And we want to nominate this for a Nobel Prize?</p></div><p>
Nobel Price nominations are not similar to for instance oscar nominations. There limited number people (mostly political leaders, etc) in the world eligible to submit nomitations. Only a single person is required to submit a nomination for it to be valid (which is how Hitler got nominated in 1939), and it's not whoever gets the most nominations that wins. Last year got 205 nominations, and complete no official record of nominees since 1955 is publish. The Commitee remains silent until the winner is declared, and there is no runner-up or anything. </p><p>That is why the Internet can get nominated, and why you wouldn't hear about it unless someone outside the Committe commented on it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , okay... How come the telegraph is n't being nominated ?
[ ... ] And we want to nominate this for a Nobel Prize ?
Nobel Price nominations are not similar to for instance oscar nominations .
There limited number people ( mostly political leaders , etc ) in the world eligible to submit nomitations .
Only a single person is required to submit a nomination for it to be valid ( which is how Hitler got nominated in 1939 ) , and it 's not whoever gets the most nominations that wins .
Last year got 205 nominations , and complete no official record of nominees since 1955 is publish .
The Commitee remains silent until the winner is declared , and there is no runner-up or anything .
That is why the Internet can get nominated , and why you would n't hear about it unless someone outside the Committe commented on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, okay... How come the telegraph isn't being nominated?
[...] And we want to nominate this for a Nobel Prize?
Nobel Price nominations are not similar to for instance oscar nominations.
There limited number people (mostly political leaders, etc) in the world eligible to submit nomitations.
Only a single person is required to submit a nomination for it to be valid (which is how Hitler got nominated in 1939), and it's not whoever gets the most nominations that wins.
Last year got 205 nominations, and complete no official record of nominees since 1955 is publish.
The Commitee remains silent until the winner is declared, and there is no runner-up or anything.
That is why the Internet can get nominated, and why you wouldn't hear about it unless someone outside the Committe commented on it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047218</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265487300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am anonymous you insensitive clod!<br>Sorry, had to...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am anonymous you insensitive clod ! Sorry , had to.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am anonymous you insensitive clod!Sorry, had to...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31050820</id>
	<title>Peace?</title>
	<author>TxRv</author>
	<datestamp>1265484720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In \_my\_ intarwebs?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In \ _my \ _ intarwebs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In \_my\_ intarwebs?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047874</id>
	<title>Sci-Nett?</title>
	<author>scorpivs</author>
	<datestamp>1265450340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>IMHO it is a dangerous mistake, and a premature one, to elevate the status of the internet to that of a life-form; the internet is neither designed nor intended to serve any purpose but to benefit its creators - the human species - as a tool as well as a toy, be this by bettering the quality of life for species other than our own, the environment or the devices of, by, from or relating to its sovereign specie.  It is an artiface, nothing more.  That much having been said, I feel we should commend ourselves as [that] uncontested sovereign species, focusing on how better to impact our evnvirons, than change the natural laws of physics for light and transient causes.  The nomination may seem innocous, but I find it entirely frivolous and I hold it in contempt.<br> <br>tl;dr</htmltext>
<tokenext>IMHO it is a dangerous mistake , and a premature one , to elevate the status of the internet to that of a life-form ; the internet is neither designed nor intended to serve any purpose but to benefit its creators - the human species - as a tool as well as a toy , be this by bettering the quality of life for species other than our own , the environment or the devices of , by , from or relating to its sovereign specie .
It is an artiface , nothing more .
That much having been said , I feel we should commend ourselves as [ that ] uncontested sovereign species , focusing on how better to impact our evnvirons , than change the natural laws of physics for light and transient causes .
The nomination may seem innocous , but I find it entirely frivolous and I hold it in contempt .
tl ; dr</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IMHO it is a dangerous mistake, and a premature one, to elevate the status of the internet to that of a life-form; the internet is neither designed nor intended to serve any purpose but to benefit its creators - the human species - as a tool as well as a toy, be this by bettering the quality of life for species other than our own, the environment or the devices of, by, from or relating to its sovereign specie.
It is an artiface, nothing more.
That much having been said, I feel we should commend ourselves as [that] uncontested sovereign species, focusing on how better to impact our evnvirons, than change the natural laws of physics for light and transient causes.
The nomination may seem innocous, but I find it entirely frivolous and I hold it in contempt.
tl;dr</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31059604</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265634780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>who would get the cash prize?  Please don't tell me it's "anonymous".  I hate that guy.</p></div><p>Hey! You don't even know me!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>who would get the cash prize ?
Please do n't tell me it 's " anonymous " .
I hate that guy.Hey !
You do n't even know me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>who would get the cash prize?
Please don't tell me it's "anonymous".
I hate that guy.Hey!
You don't even know me!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046856</id>
	<title>vote obama</title>
	<author>Sam36</author>
	<datestamp>1265483880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>obama is way better than any internet</htmltext>
<tokenext>obama is way better than any internet</tokentext>
<sentencetext>obama is way better than any internet</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046734</id>
	<title>Babelfish example</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265482920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't the internet kind of like the Babelfish in that it makes communication easier between difference groups? So in effect isn't it possible that the internet is helping to cause or prolong all the wars we have now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't the internet kind of like the Babelfish in that it makes communication easier between difference groups ?
So in effect is n't it possible that the internet is helping to cause or prolong all the wars we have now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't the internet kind of like the Babelfish in that it makes communication easier between difference groups?
So in effect isn't it possible that the internet is helping to cause or prolong all the wars we have now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048010</id>
	<title>Peace Fairy 2011</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265451900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, let's get the Peace Fairy nominated in 2011.  It's not a person who made some sacrifice to advance the world in a more peaceful direction.  It's not even something that connects people.  But the Peace Fairy stands for peace.  Only peace.  The Peace Fairy waves her magic wand and peace appears.  I mean, how could anyone even come close to spreading as much peace as the Peace Fairy?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , let 's get the Peace Fairy nominated in 2011 .
It 's not a person who made some sacrifice to advance the world in a more peaceful direction .
It 's not even something that connects people .
But the Peace Fairy stands for peace .
Only peace .
The Peace Fairy waves her magic wand and peace appears .
I mean , how could anyone even come close to spreading as much peace as the Peace Fairy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, let's get the Peace Fairy nominated in 2011.
It's not a person who made some sacrifice to advance the world in a more peaceful direction.
It's not even something that connects people.
But the Peace Fairy stands for peace.
Only peace.
The Peace Fairy waves her magic wand and peace appears.
I mean, how could anyone even come close to spreading as much peace as the Peace Fairy?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049156</id>
	<title>Re:Fail</title>
	<author>Draek</author>
	<datestamp>1265462460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The internet is not the greatest thing in the past hundred years of mass communications;</p></div><p>Yes. Yes it is. You're only deluding yourself if you believe any of the other inventions you named allowed the 'masses' to communicate massively, rather than merely the rich and the powerful.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The internet is not the greatest thing in the past hundred years of mass communications ; Yes .
Yes it is .
You 're only deluding yourself if you believe any of the other inventions you named allowed the 'masses ' to communicate massively , rather than merely the rich and the powerful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The internet is not the greatest thing in the past hundred years of mass communications;Yes.
Yes it is.
You're only deluding yourself if you believe any of the other inventions you named allowed the 'masses' to communicate massively, rather than merely the rich and the powerful.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31052868</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265564100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why do you hate me?  I did nothing wrong.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do you hate me ?
I did nothing wrong .
: (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do you hate me?
I did nothing wrong.
:(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049706</id>
	<title>The Internet couldn't be here tonight so</title>
	<author>ClosedSource</author>
	<datestamp>1265469000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll accept the prize on its behalf.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll accept the prize on its behalf .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll accept the prize on its behalf.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046512</id>
	<title>Sounds a lot like..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265481060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the time person of the year in 2006. Why not just nominate "you" for the Nobel Peace Prize.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the time person of the year in 2006 .
Why not just nominate " you " for the Nobel Peace Prize .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the time person of the year in 2006.
Why not just nominate "you" for the Nobel Peace Prize.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31054512</id>
	<title>Acceptance speech</title>
	<author>rgo</author>
	<datestamp>1265535360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, it wouldn't be the first time the Internet is in an acceptance speech: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTBsm0LzSP0" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTBsm0LzSP0</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , it would n't be the first time the Internet is in an acceptance speech : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = UTBsm0LzSP0 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, it wouldn't be the first time the Internet is in an acceptance speech: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTBsm0LzSP0 [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047826</id>
	<title>Re:While the internet has done a good bit for peac</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265449740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><blockquote><div><p>Rather than giving it to him, give it to someone who worked to make sure McCain didn't get elected</p></div></blockquote><p>And who worked harder to make sure McCain didn't get elected than Obama?</p></div><p>Sarah Palin?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rather than giving it to him , give it to someone who worked to make sure McCain did n't get electedAnd who worked harder to make sure McCain did n't get elected than Obama ? Sarah Palin ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rather than giving it to him, give it to someone who worked to make sure McCain didn't get electedAnd who worked harder to make sure McCain didn't get elected than Obama?Sarah Palin?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048130</id>
	<title>Perhaps this is to set the stage</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1265453100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
For <b>ObamaCare</b>'s  Nobel Prize in 2011.
</p><p>
And  <b>MySpace</b>'s  prize in 2012.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For ObamaCare 's Nobel Prize in 2011 .
And MySpace 's prize in 2012 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
For ObamaCare's  Nobel Prize in 2011.
And  MySpace's  prize in 2012.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31050152</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>rtb61</author>
	<datestamp>1265474700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> The best receiver of the prize is anyone fighting the double speak Internet Freedom Act and it's ilk, anywhere they appear in those world. The internet can only remain open while it remains open amd, that it receives the peace prize really would indicate that people who oppose net neutrality and promote censorship really are anti-peace, are the fermentors of deceit and war and are basically evil.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The best receiver of the prize is anyone fighting the double speak Internet Freedom Act and it 's ilk , anywhere they appear in those world .
The internet can only remain open while it remains open amd , that it receives the peace prize really would indicate that people who oppose net neutrality and promote censorship really are anti-peace , are the fermentors of deceit and war and are basically evil .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> The best receiver of the prize is anyone fighting the double speak Internet Freedom Act and it's ilk, anywhere they appear in those world.
The internet can only remain open while it remains open amd, that it receives the peace prize really would indicate that people who oppose net neutrality and promote censorship really are anti-peace, are the fermentors of deceit and war and are basically evil.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046986</id>
	<title>Clearly</title>
	<author>ShiningSomething</author>
	<datestamp>1265485080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>These people have not heard of 4chan.</htmltext>
<tokenext>These people have not heard of 4chan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These people have not heard of 4chan.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047494</id>
	<title>Re:I nominate ...</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1265447040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mine, on the other hand, have slapped more than their fair share of women in the ass.
</p><p>Disqualified.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mine , on the other hand , have slapped more than their fair share of women in the ass .
Disqualified .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mine, on the other hand, have slapped more than their fair share of women in the ass.
Disqualified.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046824</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31050588</id>
	<title>fuckyeah</title>
	<author>zaunuz</author>
	<datestamp>1265480580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can picture it..</p><p>"And the winner of the 2010 Nobel Peace Price is The Internet!"</p><p>and then Al Gore comes up to receive a sack of money, and pours it into a series of tubes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can picture it.. " And the winner of the 2010 Nobel Peace Price is The Internet !
" and then Al Gore comes up to receive a sack of money , and pours it into a series of tubes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can picture it.."And the winner of the 2010 Nobel Peace Price is The Internet!
"and then Al Gore comes up to receive a sack of money, and pours it into a series of tubes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048168</id>
	<title>that is STUPID</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265453520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How can the INTERNET win the nobel peace prize?? That sounds like something that would happen in a SOUTH PARK episode....</p><p>In South Park, you always expect the unexpected....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How can the INTERNET win the nobel peace prize ? ?
That sounds like something that would happen in a SOUTH PARK episode....In South Park , you always expect the unexpected... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can the INTERNET win the nobel peace prize??
That sounds like something that would happen in a SOUTH PARK episode....In South Park, you always expect the unexpected....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048384</id>
	<title>Re:Decline of the Prize</title>
	<author>Dirtside</author>
	<datestamp>1265455620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This "nomination" is nothing special. Anyone can nominate anyone for the Nobel Peace Prize; whether the Nobel committee opts to accept those nominations is another matter, and they don't reveal the list of nominees, just the winner.</p><p>Note that "The nomination was proposed by the Italian edition of Wired magazine for promoting 'dialogue, debate and consensus through communication' as well as democracy."" This is basically a press release from Wired Magazine (Italy) saying that <i>they</i> sent a nomination to the Nobel committee. The committee itself probably rolled its eyes and threw the form in the trash can.</p><p>Actually, if they'll give an award to Obama after six months in office, they're probably nuts enough to give it to an inanimate object.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This " nomination " is nothing special .
Anyone can nominate anyone for the Nobel Peace Prize ; whether the Nobel committee opts to accept those nominations is another matter , and they do n't reveal the list of nominees , just the winner.Note that " The nomination was proposed by the Italian edition of Wired magazine for promoting 'dialogue , debate and consensus through communication ' as well as democracy .
" " This is basically a press release from Wired Magazine ( Italy ) saying that they sent a nomination to the Nobel committee .
The committee itself probably rolled its eyes and threw the form in the trash can.Actually , if they 'll give an award to Obama after six months in office , they 're probably nuts enough to give it to an inanimate object .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This "nomination" is nothing special.
Anyone can nominate anyone for the Nobel Peace Prize; whether the Nobel committee opts to accept those nominations is another matter, and they don't reveal the list of nominees, just the winner.Note that "The nomination was proposed by the Italian edition of Wired magazine for promoting 'dialogue, debate and consensus through communication' as well as democracy.
"" This is basically a press release from Wired Magazine (Italy) saying that they sent a nomination to the Nobel committee.
The committee itself probably rolled its eyes and threw the form in the trash can.Actually, if they'll give an award to Obama after six months in office, they're probably nuts enough to give it to an inanimate object.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046706</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265482620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>  But I deserve it more than anyone.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; To all those who have flamed me in the past, PBTHHHHHH!  I got da award!</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Damn the Slashdot timers have gone wild.</p><p>Slashdot requires you to wait between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.</p><p>It's been <b>51 minutes</b> since you last successfully posted a comment</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But I deserve it more than anyone .
    To all those who have flamed me in the past , PBTHHHHHH !
I got da award !
    Damn the Slashdot timers have gone wild.Slashdot requires you to wait between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.It 's been 51 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  But I deserve it more than anyone.
    To all those who have flamed me in the past, PBTHHHHHH!
I got da award!
    Damn the Slashdot timers have gone wild.Slashdot requires you to wait between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.It's been 51 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046916</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>smpoole7</author>
	<datestamp>1265484480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This guy???
<p>
<a href="http://9gag.com/photo/12703\_540.jpg" title="9gag.com">The Final Boss Of The Internet</a> [9gag.com]?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This guy ? ? ?
The Final Boss Of The Internet [ 9gag.com ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This guy???
The Final Boss Of The Internet [9gag.com]?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048416</id>
	<title>Internet is a TOOL used for peace and war...</title>
	<author>kandresen</author>
	<datestamp>1265455980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Internet is a neutral technology; a tool that may be used for good and bad, it has done nothing in itself to improve peace or cause war.<br>- Internet is used by people to obtain war technology causing proliferation<br>- Internet is right now causing tension between US and China which are accusing each other of Internet warfare<br>- Internet could potentially be used to to send commands for setting of weapons from across the world<br>- It has been demonstrated Internet hackers could get access to power plants, cause it to malfunction, and cause minor and major "accidents"</p><p>How can anyone nominate a TOOL that may be used for good and bad for a peace price when the side of bad is just as big as that of good???<br>I completely fail to see how Internet in itself have done anything for peace.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Internet is a neutral technology ; a tool that may be used for good and bad , it has done nothing in itself to improve peace or cause war.- Internet is used by people to obtain war technology causing proliferation- Internet is right now causing tension between US and China which are accusing each other of Internet warfare- Internet could potentially be used to to send commands for setting of weapons from across the world- It has been demonstrated Internet hackers could get access to power plants , cause it to malfunction , and cause minor and major " accidents " How can anyone nominate a TOOL that may be used for good and bad for a peace price when the side of bad is just as big as that of good ? ?
? I completely fail to see how Internet in itself have done anything for peace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Internet is a neutral technology; a tool that may be used for good and bad, it has done nothing in itself to improve peace or cause war.- Internet is used by people to obtain war technology causing proliferation- Internet is right now causing tension between US and China which are accusing each other of Internet warfare- Internet could potentially be used to to send commands for setting of weapons from across the world- It has been demonstrated Internet hackers could get access to power plants, cause it to malfunction, and cause minor and major "accidents"How can anyone nominate a TOOL that may be used for good and bad for a peace price when the side of bad is just as big as that of good??
?I completely fail to see how Internet in itself have done anything for peace.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046824</id>
	<title>I nominate ...</title>
	<author>paimin</author>
	<datestamp>1265483580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My. Balls.  They're peaceful.  They never hurt no one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My .
Balls. They 're peaceful .
They never hurt no one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My.
Balls.  They're peaceful.
They never hurt no one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048162</id>
	<title>Re:Fail</title>
	<author>nine-times</author>
	<datestamp>1265453460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well in a certain way of looking at things, nominating the Internet includes nominating all of those other things at the same time.  Essentially you're nominating "the state of the art in mass communication", which includes sending signals over wire and mass reproduction of text.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well in a certain way of looking at things , nominating the Internet includes nominating all of those other things at the same time .
Essentially you 're nominating " the state of the art in mass communication " , which includes sending signals over wire and mass reproduction of text .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well in a certain way of looking at things, nominating the Internet includes nominating all of those other things at the same time.
Essentially you're nominating "the state of the art in mass communication", which includes sending signals over wire and mass reproduction of text.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046848</id>
	<title>Is it just me,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265483760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>or is the Nobel committee just seeing if they can get exponentially more ludicrous year after year?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>or is the Nobel committee just seeing if they can get exponentially more ludicrous year after year ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or is the Nobel committee just seeing if they can get exponentially more ludicrous year after year?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31052918</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Yvanhoe</author>
	<datestamp>1265564820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can picture a bunch of guys with "V" masks reciting something redacted by 4chan, concluding by "thx lol fags", saluting the king, going out while the assistance wonders what the fuck they have just done.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can picture a bunch of guys with " V " masks reciting something redacted by 4chan , concluding by " thx lol fags " , saluting the king , going out while the assistance wonders what the fuck they have just done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can picture a bunch of guys with "V" masks reciting something redacted by 4chan, concluding by "thx lol fags", saluting the king, going out while the assistance wonders what the fuck they have just done.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31052382</id>
	<title>Re:Tim Berners-Lee</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265558100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, it's like awarding a peace prize to the cables and wires rather than the main application, the voice telephone. No one cares about the wires or packet switching, just the application, the telephone.<br>In the case of the Web, it is the application and most people confuse it with the Internet.  Do they really mean the Internet or the WWW ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , it 's like awarding a peace prize to the cables and wires rather than the main application , the voice telephone .
No one cares about the wires or packet switching , just the application , the telephone.In the case of the Web , it is the application and most people confuse it with the Internet .
Do they really mean the Internet or the WWW ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, it's like awarding a peace prize to the cables and wires rather than the main application, the voice telephone.
No one cares about the wires or packet switching, just the application, the telephone.In the case of the Web, it is the application and most people confuse it with the Internet.
Do they really mean the Internet or the WWW ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049500</id>
	<title>If we can nominate the Internet ...</title>
	<author>Anarchduke</author>
	<datestamp>1265466000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Then I want to nominate the Pacific Ocean for a Peace Prize.  Without the Pacific Ocean separating The Americas from Asia and Australia, I am certain we would have had more wars.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Then I want to nominate the Pacific Ocean for a Peace Prize .
Without the Pacific Ocean separating The Americas from Asia and Australia , I am certain we would have had more wars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then I want to nominate the Pacific Ocean for a Peace Prize.
Without the Pacific Ocean separating The Americas from Asia and Australia, I am certain we would have had more wars.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31051548</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265544780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fuck you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31052938</id>
	<title>Recognition of censorship ?</title>
	<author>Yvanhoe</author>
	<datestamp>1265565000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A lot of peace nobel prizes (including Shirin Ebadi's) have been awarded to people who fight censorship and oppression, in the hope it will help loosen their enemies. I can say that in this respect, it makes sense.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of peace nobel prizes ( including Shirin Ebadi 's ) have been awarded to people who fight censorship and oppression , in the hope it will help loosen their enemies .
I can say that in this respect , it makes sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of peace nobel prizes (including Shirin Ebadi's) have been awarded to people who fight censorship and oppression, in the hope it will help loosen their enemies.
I can say that in this respect, it makes sense.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046574</id>
	<title>Re:irony</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265481540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>maybe... or maybe to UCLA and Stanford as they were the ones doing the actual research and had the first INTER-conneted NETworks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>maybe... or maybe to UCLA and Stanford as they were the ones doing the actual research and had the first INTER-conneted NETworks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>maybe... or maybe to UCLA and Stanford as they were the ones doing the actual research and had the first INTER-conneted NETworks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047460</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>SEWilco</author>
	<datestamp>1265489880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Obviously Nigeria should get the cash prize.  They've given out quintillions through the Internet.  Why, I'm getting $3.4 billion this week alone from them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously Nigeria should get the cash prize .
They 've given out quintillions through the Internet .
Why , I 'm getting $ 3.4 billion this week alone from them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously Nigeria should get the cash prize.
They've given out quintillions through the Internet.
Why, I'm getting $3.4 billion this week alone from them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047816</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265449680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With great humility, I accept.</p><p>It's sad that so many people hate me.<br>It's probably because of that guy who impersonates me and writes BS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With great humility , I accept.It 's sad that so many people hate me.It 's probably because of that guy who impersonates me and writes BS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With great humility, I accept.It's sad that so many people hate me.It's probably because of that guy who impersonates me and writes BS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048622</id>
	<title>Re:Fail</title>
	<author>avilliers</author>
	<datestamp>1265457960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yeah, okay... How come the telegraph isn't being nominated? </p></div><p>Because Wired magazine doesn't sell more copies when they spew idiotic hype about the telegraph?</p><p>Seriously.  There are hundreds of distinct "nominees" for the Nobel Peace Prize each years.  The committee solicits recommendations from thousands of people.  Good for them that they cast a wide net to look for ideas.  A lot of them will be at this level of idiocy; the Nobel committee will simply ignore them.</p><p>Wired apparently chose to nominate "The Internet," a transparently self-serving attempt to make the subject of their reporting seem more important.  The Nobel committee itself won't release lists of who's been recommended for 50 years (see <a href="http://nobelprize.org/nomination/peace/" title="nobelprize.org" rel="nofollow">http://nobelprize.org/nomination/peace/</a> [nobelprize.org]), but Wired is free to announce that they nominated it, then cover a story which they created themselves.    This is entirely consistent with their tradition a tradition of superficial gee-whiz features about things that sound possibly intriguing in a summary and are found to be inaccurate, irrelevant or meaningless after two seconds of thought.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , okay... How come the telegraph is n't being nominated ?
Because Wired magazine does n't sell more copies when they spew idiotic hype about the telegraph ? Seriously .
There are hundreds of distinct " nominees " for the Nobel Peace Prize each years .
The committee solicits recommendations from thousands of people .
Good for them that they cast a wide net to look for ideas .
A lot of them will be at this level of idiocy ; the Nobel committee will simply ignore them.Wired apparently chose to nominate " The Internet , " a transparently self-serving attempt to make the subject of their reporting seem more important .
The Nobel committee itself wo n't release lists of who 's been recommended for 50 years ( see http : //nobelprize.org/nomination/peace/ [ nobelprize.org ] ) , but Wired is free to announce that they nominated it , then cover a story which they created themselves .
This is entirely consistent with their tradition a tradition of superficial gee-whiz features about things that sound possibly intriguing in a summary and are found to be inaccurate , irrelevant or meaningless after two seconds of thought .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, okay... How come the telegraph isn't being nominated?
Because Wired magazine doesn't sell more copies when they spew idiotic hype about the telegraph?Seriously.
There are hundreds of distinct "nominees" for the Nobel Peace Prize each years.
The committee solicits recommendations from thousands of people.
Good for them that they cast a wide net to look for ideas.
A lot of them will be at this level of idiocy; the Nobel committee will simply ignore them.Wired apparently chose to nominate "The Internet," a transparently self-serving attempt to make the subject of their reporting seem more important.
The Nobel committee itself won't release lists of who's been recommended for 50 years (see http://nobelprize.org/nomination/peace/ [nobelprize.org]), but Wired is free to announce that they nominated it, then cover a story which they created themselves.
This is entirely consistent with their tradition a tradition of superficial gee-whiz features about things that sound possibly intriguing in a summary and are found to be inaccurate, irrelevant or meaningless after two seconds of thought.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047970</id>
	<title>I'm selling mine.</title>
	<author>paxcoder</author>
	<datestamp>1265451540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where peace prize must go according to the will of Alfred Noble:<br>"to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."</p><p>Since we disregarded the latter in case of Obama (the peace thing), nothing stops us from disregarding the former (the person thing).<br>If they redefine it to mean "people who USE Internet", I'll sell you mine, so you can have two since it obviously means nothing anymore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where peace prize must go according to the will of Alfred Noble : " to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations , for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses .
" Since we disregarded the latter in case of Obama ( the peace thing ) , nothing stops us from disregarding the former ( the person thing ) .If they redefine it to mean " people who USE Internet " , I 'll sell you mine , so you can have two since it obviously means nothing anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where peace prize must go according to the will of Alfred Noble:"to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.
"Since we disregarded the latter in case of Obama (the peace thing), nothing stops us from disregarding the former (the person thing).If they redefine it to mean "people who USE Internet", I'll sell you mine, so you can have two since it obviously means nothing anymore.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048984</id>
	<title>Internet?</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1265461200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok, fine. its important. How about award the teams that started the entire thing instead?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , fine .
its important .
How about award the teams that started the entire thing instead ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, fine.
its important.
How about award the teams that started the entire thing instead?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046592</id>
	<title>Let Al Gore Accept</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265481780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Al Gore should accept on behalf of the Internet; this way the irrelevance of the Nobel Peace Prize will be complete.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Al Gore should accept on behalf of the Internet ; this way the irrelevance of the Nobel Peace Prize will be complete .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Al Gore should accept on behalf of the Internet; this way the irrelevance of the Nobel Peace Prize will be complete.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31050784</id>
	<title>lame</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265484180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Nobel peace prize just gets stupider and stupider each year. Sounds like some stupid gimmick like were Time magazine's person of the year would be "You" and there'd be a mirror in the cover. Can't they just freakin' find some third world human rights / democracy activist / charity person and give it to him/her? Or they out of those? I mean wtf</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Nobel peace prize just gets stupider and stupider each year .
Sounds like some stupid gimmick like were Time magazine 's person of the year would be " You " and there 'd be a mirror in the cover .
Ca n't they just freakin ' find some third world human rights / democracy activist / charity person and give it to him/her ?
Or they out of those ?
I mean wtf</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Nobel peace prize just gets stupider and stupider each year.
Sounds like some stupid gimmick like were Time magazine's person of the year would be "You" and there'd be a mirror in the cover.
Can't they just freakin' find some third world human rights / democracy activist / charity person and give it to him/her?
Or they out of those?
I mean wtf</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046616</id>
	<title>darpa</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265481960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, the award would really have to be given to DARPA -- the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which is where the Internet was invented. After all the attention last year given to Obama receiving the prize while waging two wars, I think giving it to the US Military directly would really drive some people over the edge.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , the award would really have to be given to DARPA -- the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency , which is where the Internet was invented .
After all the attention last year given to Obama receiving the prize while waging two wars , I think giving it to the US Military directly would really drive some people over the edge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, the award would really have to be given to DARPA -- the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which is where the Internet was invented.
After all the attention last year given to Obama receiving the prize while waging two wars, I think giving it to the US Military directly would really drive some people over the edge.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046602</id>
	<title>Re:irony</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1265481900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They would probably twist it in a way that Tim Berners-Lee or similar persona could accept it (easy, "pushed the Internet into mass acceptance" or something like that)</p><p>All I know is that if it wins, I'm flying, driving or taking a train / ferry just to be in Oslo on the occasion.</p><p>Wearing V mask.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They would probably twist it in a way that Tim Berners-Lee or similar persona could accept it ( easy , " pushed the Internet into mass acceptance " or something like that ) All I know is that if it wins , I 'm flying , driving or taking a train / ferry just to be in Oslo on the occasion.Wearing V mask .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They would probably twist it in a way that Tim Berners-Lee or similar persona could accept it (easy, "pushed the Internet into mass acceptance" or something like that)All I know is that if it wins, I'm flying, driving or taking a train / ferry just to be in Oslo on the occasion.Wearing V mask.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046612</id>
	<title>Tim Berners-Lee</title>
	<author>tomduck</author>
	<datestamp>1265481960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have always thought that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim\_Berners-Lee" title="wikipedia.org">Tim Berners-Lee</a> [wikipedia.org], inventor of the World-Wide-Web, is deserving of a Peace Prize.  Communication is the foundation of peace, and it is hard do identify another individual who has done so much for world-wide communications in recent history.</p><p>Awarding the Peace Prize to a thing?  Ugh.  Don't get me started.  Awarding the Prize to organizations is silly enough already.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have always thought that Tim Berners-Lee [ wikipedia.org ] , inventor of the World-Wide-Web , is deserving of a Peace Prize .
Communication is the foundation of peace , and it is hard do identify another individual who has done so much for world-wide communications in recent history.Awarding the Peace Prize to a thing ?
Ugh. Do n't get me started .
Awarding the Prize to organizations is silly enough already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have always thought that Tim Berners-Lee [wikipedia.org], inventor of the World-Wide-Web, is deserving of a Peace Prize.
Communication is the foundation of peace, and it is hard do identify another individual who has done so much for world-wide communications in recent history.Awarding the Peace Prize to a thing?
Ugh.  Don't get me started.
Awarding the Prize to organizations is silly enough already.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046532</id>
	<title>Spoon?</title>
	<author>sugarmotor</author>
	<datestamp>1265481300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Spoon!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Spoon !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spoon!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046982</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265485080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the history of the internet is any indication, the entire cash prize will be spent to pay for more porn!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the history of the internet is any indication , the entire cash prize will be spent to pay for more porn !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the history of the internet is any indication, the entire cash prize will be spent to pay for more porn!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047188</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Third Position</author>
	<datestamp>1265487000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know about you, but I can't wait to see the internet in a tux, giving the acceptance speech.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know about you , but I ca n't wait to see the internet in a tux , giving the acceptance speech .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know about you, but I can't wait to see the internet in a tux, giving the acceptance speech.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047626</id>
	<title>Porn wins the Peace prize.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265448060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So if the internet is for porn, and the internet wins the Nobel Peace prize....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So if the internet is for porn , and the internet wins the Nobel Peace prize... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if the internet is for porn, and the internet wins the Nobel Peace prize....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046648</id>
	<title>While the internet has done a good bit for peace..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265482200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... can't we find somebody else who deserves the thing? Obama's done no more for world peace than any other sane person in the US: he's not a radical warmonger, but that in itself shouldn't get you an award. Rather than giving it to him, give it to someone who worked to make sure McCain didn't get elected, if you want to tie it to the US.</p><p>Morgan Tsangvirai, maybe. Or the pro-democracy campaigners in Iran.</p><p>Are there really that few good people in the world these days?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... ca n't we find somebody else who deserves the thing ?
Obama 's done no more for world peace than any other sane person in the US : he 's not a radical warmonger , but that in itself should n't get you an award .
Rather than giving it to him , give it to someone who worked to make sure McCain did n't get elected , if you want to tie it to the US.Morgan Tsangvirai , maybe .
Or the pro-democracy campaigners in Iran.Are there really that few good people in the world these days ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... can't we find somebody else who deserves the thing?
Obama's done no more for world peace than any other sane person in the US: he's not a radical warmonger, but that in itself shouldn't get you an award.
Rather than giving it to him, give it to someone who worked to make sure McCain didn't get elected, if you want to tie it to the US.Morgan Tsangvirai, maybe.
Or the pro-democracy campaigners in Iran.Are there really that few good people in the world these days?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046478</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265480880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>"At least the Internet's been in office longer than Obama"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" At least the Internet 's been in office longer than Obama "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"At least the Internet's been in office longer than Obama"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046712</id>
	<title>Re:While the internet has done a good bit for peac</title>
	<author>russotto</author>
	<datestamp>1265482680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Rather than giving it to him, give it to someone who worked to make sure McCain didn't get elected</p></div></blockquote><p>And who worked harder to make sure McCain didn't get elected than Obama?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rather than giving it to him , give it to someone who worked to make sure McCain did n't get electedAnd who worked harder to make sure McCain did n't get elected than Obama ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rather than giving it to him, give it to someone who worked to make sure McCain didn't get electedAnd who worked harder to make sure McCain didn't get elected than Obama?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046764</id>
	<title>Well, it's become a political game....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265483220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Nobel Peace Prize has become a political game more than anything. I don't even bother clicking anymore when I hear about whatever the next peace price is going to be...<br>Overinflated too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Nobel Peace Prize has become a political game more than anything .
I do n't even bother clicking anymore when I hear about whatever the next peace price is going to be...Overinflated too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Nobel Peace Prize has become a political game more than anything.
I don't even bother clicking anymore when I hear about whatever the next peace price is going to be...Overinflated too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046820</id>
	<title>Resist great firewalls</title>
	<author>presidenteloco</author>
	<datestamp>1265483520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is something to this, in that when individual citizens of different countries<br>communicate directly with each other, and can read a broad range of perspective,<br>their political views will inevitably slide toward global norms.</p><p>The non-hierarchical, international nature of the Internet is a threat to<br>the sovereignty of state governments. The state government now just becomes<br>one of many voices communicating with its people.</p><p>The challenge to peace-loving people will be resisting the tendency of threatened state governments<br>to erect more and more opaque and monitored firewalls (or latency walls)<br>between the nets in different countries.</p><p>The invention of GeoIP services (restricting my ability to view and purchase things, depending<br>on my country) has already made the Internet tragically more bordered<br>than it was even 10 years ago. We have to resist this trend. We have to allow simple global<br>e-commerce, and open global sharing of cultural "products".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is something to this , in that when individual citizens of different countriescommunicate directly with each other , and can read a broad range of perspective,their political views will inevitably slide toward global norms.The non-hierarchical , international nature of the Internet is a threat tothe sovereignty of state governments .
The state government now just becomesone of many voices communicating with its people.The challenge to peace-loving people will be resisting the tendency of threatened state governmentsto erect more and more opaque and monitored firewalls ( or latency walls ) between the nets in different countries.The invention of GeoIP services ( restricting my ability to view and purchase things , dependingon my country ) has already made the Internet tragically more borderedthan it was even 10 years ago .
We have to resist this trend .
We have to allow simple globale-commerce , and open global sharing of cultural " products " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is something to this, in that when individual citizens of different countriescommunicate directly with each other, and can read a broad range of perspective,their political views will inevitably slide toward global norms.The non-hierarchical, international nature of the Internet is a threat tothe sovereignty of state governments.
The state government now just becomesone of many voices communicating with its people.The challenge to peace-loving people will be resisting the tendency of threatened state governmentsto erect more and more opaque and monitored firewalls (or latency walls)between the nets in different countries.The invention of GeoIP services (restricting my ability to view and purchase things, dependingon my country) has already made the Internet tragically more borderedthan it was even 10 years ago.
We have to resist this trend.
We have to allow simple globale-commerce, and open global sharing of cultural "products".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047090</id>
	<title>The same people that awarded prizes to</title>
	<author>Low Ranked Craig</author>
	<datestamp>1265486040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yasser Arafat for bring "peace" and then Obama for things he had yet to do?  </p><p>
This is about as meaningful as who wins an Academy Award.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yasser Arafat for bring " peace " and then Obama for things he had yet to do ?
This is about as meaningful as who wins an Academy Award .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yasser Arafat for bring "peace" and then Obama for things he had yet to do?
This is about as meaningful as who wins an Academy Award.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046858</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>davester666</author>
	<datestamp>1265483880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but why did it get nominated?</p><p>It's been the scene for the biggest flame-wars in history!  Is it just because so few people actually died because of these wars?</p><p>And Hitler seems to get mentioned a surprising number of times...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but why did it get nominated ? It 's been the scene for the biggest flame-wars in history !
Is it just because so few people actually died because of these wars ? And Hitler seems to get mentioned a surprising number of times.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but why did it get nominated?It's been the scene for the biggest flame-wars in history!
Is it just because so few people actually died because of these wars?And Hitler seems to get mentioned a surprising number of times...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046788</id>
	<title>Re:Fail</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1265483280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Telegraph, mail, phone, are basically 1vs1 communications, usually between people that know each other. Newspaper, Television, movies, are 1 or few to many, and sometimes the source of that communication is controlled by very few or follow the policy of government or some groups. But internet is communication everyone with everyone, usually unfiltered.<br><br>Pre-internet you could anonimize all the people of a region, country or culture, put them under an unified view, and see them as the enemy, rival, or whatever your government say. Now you deal directly against with individuals, against people with what you could communicate. Maybe won't stop future wars (i.e. didnt stopped US intervention in iraq) but could make that kind of things harder. If you take governments out of the equation, could be seen as a positive push to world peace.<br><br>Ok, until the trigger for WWIII is the discussion on who should get that cash.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Telegraph , mail , phone , are basically 1vs1 communications , usually between people that know each other .
Newspaper , Television , movies , are 1 or few to many , and sometimes the source of that communication is controlled by very few or follow the policy of government or some groups .
But internet is communication everyone with everyone , usually unfiltered.Pre-internet you could anonimize all the people of a region , country or culture , put them under an unified view , and see them as the enemy , rival , or whatever your government say .
Now you deal directly against with individuals , against people with what you could communicate .
Maybe wo n't stop future wars ( i.e .
didnt stopped US intervention in iraq ) but could make that kind of things harder .
If you take governments out of the equation , could be seen as a positive push to world peace.Ok , until the trigger for WWIII is the discussion on who should get that cash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Telegraph, mail, phone, are basically 1vs1 communications, usually between people that know each other.
Newspaper, Television, movies, are 1 or few to many, and sometimes the source of that communication is controlled by very few or follow the policy of government or some groups.
But internet is communication everyone with everyone, usually unfiltered.Pre-internet you could anonimize all the people of a region, country or culture, put them under an unified view, and see them as the enemy, rival, or whatever your government say.
Now you deal directly against with individuals, against people with what you could communicate.
Maybe won't stop future wars (i.e.
didnt stopped US intervention in iraq) but could make that kind of things harder.
If you take governments out of the equation, could be seen as a positive push to world peace.Ok, until the trigger for WWIII is the discussion on who should get that cash.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046774</id>
	<title>Ludicrous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265483220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, after exposing themselves for the utter frauds they are after the last winner, I'd hardly put it past the Committee.</p><p>There's no reason to give a Nobel Prize of any kind to an inanimate collection of circuits.  You give the prize to people who built the circuits.</p><p>I mean, you know<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... <i>duh</i>.</p><p>I wondering if my knowing this particular tidbit of sanity would qualify me for a Nobel Prize of my own<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , after exposing themselves for the utter frauds they are after the last winner , I 'd hardly put it past the Committee.There 's no reason to give a Nobel Prize of any kind to an inanimate collection of circuits .
You give the prize to people who built the circuits.I mean , you know ... duh.I wondering if my knowing this particular tidbit of sanity would qualify me for a Nobel Prize of my own ... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, after exposing themselves for the utter frauds they are after the last winner, I'd hardly put it past the Committee.There's no reason to give a Nobel Prize of any kind to an inanimate collection of circuits.
You give the prize to people who built the circuits.I mean, you know ... duh.I wondering if my knowing this particular tidbit of sanity would qualify me for a Nobel Prize of my own ... ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046732</id>
	<title>Nominate Al Gore</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265482920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shoot, just nominate Al Gore for creating it!  Do I have to think of everything?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Shoot , just nominate Al Gore for creating it !
Do I have to think of everything ?
: ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shoot, just nominate Al Gore for creating it!
Do I have to think of everything?
:).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31050364</id>
	<title>A Prize for ... the Internet</title>
	<author>owenjohn</author>
	<datestamp>1265477700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This reminds me of a great short SF story by J.F. Bone: A Prize for Edie <a href="http://manybooks.net/pages/bonejf2633226332/0.html" title="manybooks.net" rel="nofollow">http://manybooks.net/pages/bonejf2633226332/0.html</a> [manybooks.net]

"The Committee had, unquestionably, made a mistake. There was no doubt that Edie had achieved the long-sought cancer cure<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... but awarding the Nobel Prize was, nonetheless, a mistake<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..."</htmltext>
<tokenext>This reminds me of a great short SF story by J.F .
Bone : A Prize for Edie http : //manybooks.net/pages/bonejf2633226332/0.html [ manybooks.net ] " The Committee had , unquestionably , made a mistake .
There was no doubt that Edie had achieved the long-sought cancer cure ... but awarding the Nobel Prize was , nonetheless , a mistake ... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This reminds me of a great short SF story by J.F.
Bone: A Prize for Edie http://manybooks.net/pages/bonejf2633226332/0.html [manybooks.net]

"The Committee had, unquestionably, made a mistake.
There was no doubt that Edie had achieved the long-sought cancer cure ... but awarding the Nobel Prize was, nonetheless, a mistake ..."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046840</id>
	<title>Re:While the internet has done a good bit for peac</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265483700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Are there really that few good people in the world these days?</p></div></blockquote><p>Maybe. Or at least they are getting harder to identify.</p><p>One problem is that the word <i>hero</i> is over-used and abused.  For example, anyone from "our side" who gets killed in war is a hero.  Sorry -- and this is not a popular position these days -- but that is wrong, despite the families need to justify their horrendous sacrifice.  Furthermore, it only perpetuates the never-ending cycle of war we seem to have gotten ourselves into.  We don't want to "dishour" their sacrifice by refusing to sacrifice more of our youth.</p><p>Nelson Mandella is one of my personal heroes.  But would he survive as a hero in this day and age?  A lot of effort is spent trying to tear people of accomplishment down.  Nobody is perfect.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are there really that few good people in the world these days ? Maybe .
Or at least they are getting harder to identify.One problem is that the word hero is over-used and abused .
For example , anyone from " our side " who gets killed in war is a hero .
Sorry -- and this is not a popular position these days -- but that is wrong , despite the families need to justify their horrendous sacrifice .
Furthermore , it only perpetuates the never-ending cycle of war we seem to have gotten ourselves into .
We do n't want to " dishour " their sacrifice by refusing to sacrifice more of our youth.Nelson Mandella is one of my personal heroes .
But would he survive as a hero in this day and age ?
A lot of effort is spent trying to tear people of accomplishment down .
Nobody is perfect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are there really that few good people in the world these days?Maybe.
Or at least they are getting harder to identify.One problem is that the word hero is over-used and abused.
For example, anyone from "our side" who gets killed in war is a hero.
Sorry -- and this is not a popular position these days -- but that is wrong, despite the families need to justify their horrendous sacrifice.
Furthermore, it only perpetuates the never-ending cycle of war we seem to have gotten ourselves into.
We don't want to "dishour" their sacrifice by refusing to sacrifice more of our youth.Nelson Mandella is one of my personal heroes.
But would he survive as a hero in this day and age?
A lot of effort is spent trying to tear people of accomplishment down.
Nobody is perfect.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047022</id>
	<title>Re:Tim Berners-Lee</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1265485380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know that the WWW is only a PART of the Internet?<br>As in: The USA is just a PART of the world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know that the WWW is only a PART of the Internet ? As in : The USA is just a PART of the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know that the WWW is only a PART of the Internet?As in: The USA is just a PART of the world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046798</id>
	<title>Re:Fail</title>
	<author>SpeedyDX</author>
	<datestamp>1265483400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I'm reading you right, you're saying that something that is very useful and has a lot of legitimate uses but at the same time has a few illegitimate uses should be considered a bad thing. Huh. Who knew? I guess the RIAA has more influence on us than we thought.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I 'm reading you right , you 're saying that something that is very useful and has a lot of legitimate uses but at the same time has a few illegitimate uses should be considered a bad thing .
Huh. Who knew ?
I guess the RIAA has more influence on us than we thought .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I'm reading you right, you're saying that something that is very useful and has a lot of legitimate uses but at the same time has a few illegitimate uses should be considered a bad thing.
Huh. Who knew?
I guess the RIAA has more influence on us than we thought.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046878</id>
	<title>Re:in before the irony</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1265484120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>when the singularity and skynet arrive we'll all look back at this...</p></div></blockquote><p>Which Terminator should accept the award, the California Governor-resembling model, or the oozing silver one?<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>when the singularity and skynet arrive we 'll all look back at this...Which Terminator should accept the award , the California Governor-resembling model , or the oozing silver one ?
     </tokentext>
<sentencetext>when the singularity and skynet arrive we'll all look back at this...Which Terminator should accept the award, the California Governor-resembling model, or the oozing silver one?
     
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046864</id>
	<title>This trend started when the Supreme Court</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1265483940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...gave corporations the same rights to bribe politicians as individuals.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...gave corporations the same rights to bribe politicians as individuals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...gave corporations the same rights to bribe politicians as individuals.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046514</id>
	<title>Decline of the Prize</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265481120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it just me, or is the Peace Price rapidly declining into nothing more than an alternate venue for Time magazine's "man/woman/person/object of the year"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or is the Peace Price rapidly declining into nothing more than an alternate venue for Time magazine 's " man/woman/person/object of the year " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or is the Peace Price rapidly declining into nothing more than an alternate venue for Time magazine's "man/woman/person/object of the year"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047294</id>
	<title>Internet should get a Nobel price for war...</title>
	<author>azgard</author>
	<datestamp>1265488020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..since not one, but two new types of war were discovered with the Internet - cyberwar and flamewar.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..since not one , but two new types of war were discovered with the Internet - cyberwar and flamewar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..since not one, but two new types of war were discovered with the Internet - cyberwar and flamewar.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046570</id>
	<title>Well...</title>
	<author>mobby\_6kl</author>
	<datestamp>1265481540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*fetches a flamesuit*</p><p>well, at least that's not as ridiculous as when Obama got the prize!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* fetches a flamesuit * well , at least that 's not as ridiculous as when Obama got the prize !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*fetches a flamesuit*well, at least that's not as ridiculous as when Obama got the prize!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046608</id>
	<title>Web 4.0 should win</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265481960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Web 4.0 should clearly win the prize.</p><p>Now, I'm not sure exactly what Web 4.0 will be.  But I'm *sure* it will be so great we may as well award it the prize now.</p><p>And hey, at the very least at least it won't be Web 1.0.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Web 4.0 should clearly win the prize.Now , I 'm not sure exactly what Web 4.0 will be .
But I 'm * sure * it will be so great we may as well award it the prize now.And hey , at the very least at least it wo n't be Web 1.0 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Web 4.0 should clearly win the prize.Now, I'm not sure exactly what Web 4.0 will be.
But I'm *sure* it will be so great we may as well award it the prize now.And hey, at the very least at least it won't be Web 1.0.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31062672</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265656200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And Hitler seems to get mentioned a surprising number of times...</p></div><p>Godwin's Law!</p><p>Why did this thread continue at all after this post?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And Hitler seems to get mentioned a surprising number of times...Godwin 's Law ! Why did this thread continue at all after this post ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And Hitler seems to get mentioned a surprising number of times...Godwin's Law!Why did this thread continue at all after this post?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046492</id>
	<title>in before the irony</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265481000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>when the singularity and skynet arrive we'll all look back at this and laugh(before our demise)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>when the singularity and skynet arrive we 'll all look back at this and laugh ( before our demise )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>when the singularity and skynet arrive we'll all look back at this and laugh(before our demise)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047742</id>
	<title>Re:Fail</title>
	<author>sourcerror</author>
	<datestamp>1265448960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How come the telegraph isn't being nominated? It was the first time people on different continents started talking to each other in real-time. Or radio for that matter.</p></div><p>Last time I checked you couldn't do a political debate on HAM radio. And I never had a telegraph, nor my parents, nor my grandparents. But i have to admit it's really good for short messages, like declaring war etc.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How come the telegraph is n't being nominated ?
It was the first time people on different continents started talking to each other in real-time .
Or radio for that matter.Last time I checked you could n't do a political debate on HAM radio .
And I never had a telegraph , nor my parents , nor my grandparents .
But i have to admit it 's really good for short messages , like declaring war etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How come the telegraph isn't being nominated?
It was the first time people on different continents started talking to each other in real-time.
Or radio for that matter.Last time I checked you couldn't do a political debate on HAM radio.
And I never had a telegraph, nor my parents, nor my grandparents.
But i have to admit it's really good for short messages, like declaring war etc.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049070</id>
	<title>Have they recieved big funding from the U.S.?</title>
	<author>ElusiveJoe</author>
	<datestamp>1265461800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Next time they will nominate Atomic Bomb for "ending the most violent war in the human history".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Next time they will nominate Atomic Bomb for " ending the most violent war in the human history " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next time they will nominate Atomic Bomb for "ending the most violent war in the human history".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31052694</id>
	<title>Impressive...</title>
	<author>TaleSpinner</author>
	<datestamp>1265561700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...after all, we know how much work and deliberation goes into giving these things out...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...after all , we know how much work and deliberation goes into giving these things out.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...after all, we know how much work and deliberation goes into giving these things out...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048380</id>
	<title>Re:darpa</title>
	<author>sergiusens</author>
	<datestamp>1265455620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
Darpa? No way. The Elders of the Internet should receive the award, no doubt about it</htmltext>
<tokenext>Darpa ?
No way .
The Elders of the Internet should receive the award , no doubt about it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Darpa?
No way.
The Elders of the Internet should receive the award, no doubt about it</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047004</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1265485260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As much as I like Obama (I did vote for him), I think the Internet is more deserving of a peace prize than Obama was! Guys who spend all day wanking off to free pictures of Cindy Margolis simply don't have the time or energy to wage war!</htmltext>
<tokenext>As much as I like Obama ( I did vote for him ) , I think the Internet is more deserving of a peace prize than Obama was !
Guys who spend all day wanking off to free pictures of Cindy Margolis simply do n't have the time or energy to wage war !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As much as I like Obama (I did vote for him), I think the Internet is more deserving of a peace prize than Obama was!
Guys who spend all day wanking off to free pictures of Cindy Margolis simply don't have the time or energy to wage war!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048336</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>tverbeek</author>
	<datestamp>1265455260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I vote that the prize be divided among all of the people who can prove they had an internet-routeable e-mail account more than 25 years ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I vote that the prize be divided among all of the people who can prove they had an internet-routeable e-mail account more than 25 years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I vote that the prize be divided among all of the people who can prove they had an internet-routeable e-mail account more than 25 years ago.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31050672</id>
	<title>Pass it on</title>
	<author>halcyon1234</author>
	<datestamp>1265481900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Excellent news.  The Council of Elders will let the Internet know next time they go to Big Ben.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Excellent news .
The Council of Elders will let the Internet know next time they go to Big Ben .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Excellent news.
The Council of Elders will let the Internet know next time they go to Big Ben.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047352</id>
	<title>Re:Decline of the Prize</title>
	<author>audunr</author>
	<datestamp>1265488620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There have been controversial winners throughout the peace prize's history. Sometimes the prize goes to people who have waged war at some point, other times to people who have done something that most people don't think of as peace related.</p><p>No need to discuss if Obama actually deserved the prize, but I think a lot of people here in Norway believe he was awarded the prize because the leader of the comittee, Torbj&#248;rn Jagland, wanted to bring about a lot of attention to himself (and Norway).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There have been controversial winners throughout the peace prize 's history .
Sometimes the prize goes to people who have waged war at some point , other times to people who have done something that most people do n't think of as peace related.No need to discuss if Obama actually deserved the prize , but I think a lot of people here in Norway believe he was awarded the prize because the leader of the comittee , Torbj   rn Jagland , wanted to bring about a lot of attention to himself ( and Norway ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There have been controversial winners throughout the peace prize's history.
Sometimes the prize goes to people who have waged war at some point, other times to people who have done something that most people don't think of as peace related.No need to discuss if Obama actually deserved the prize, but I think a lot of people here in Norway believe he was awarded the prize because the leader of the comittee, Torbjørn Jagland, wanted to bring about a lot of attention to himself (and Norway).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047682</id>
	<title>Re:Decline of the Prize</title>
	<author>jfengel</author>
	<datestamp>1265448480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Peace Prize has done some excellent service, bringing to the world stage people who were going unnoticed.  Nobody had ever heard of Aung San Suu Kyi or Carlos Belo, and the attention really does do some good there.  They gain international support for ongoing work.  Sometimes it has gone to people who have genuinely done good work and deserve to be rewarded in retrospect, as it is in the science prizes.</p><p>On the other hand, some years have been completely out of line, such as Kissinger or Obama.  (I'm a big fan of Obama, but the peace prize was completely unnecessary: he needed neither encouragement nor money to do his work.  There were other people who could use the attention and money to better effect, and he had no accomplishments of note.)</p><p>In other words: a mixed bag.  I suppose that the worst failures do little harm, and the successes do some good, so it's worth it.  Even if it means putting up with the occasional simultaneous international facepalm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Peace Prize has done some excellent service , bringing to the world stage people who were going unnoticed .
Nobody had ever heard of Aung San Suu Kyi or Carlos Belo , and the attention really does do some good there .
They gain international support for ongoing work .
Sometimes it has gone to people who have genuinely done good work and deserve to be rewarded in retrospect , as it is in the science prizes.On the other hand , some years have been completely out of line , such as Kissinger or Obama .
( I 'm a big fan of Obama , but the peace prize was completely unnecessary : he needed neither encouragement nor money to do his work .
There were other people who could use the attention and money to better effect , and he had no accomplishments of note .
) In other words : a mixed bag .
I suppose that the worst failures do little harm , and the successes do some good , so it 's worth it .
Even if it means putting up with the occasional simultaneous international facepalm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Peace Prize has done some excellent service, bringing to the world stage people who were going unnoticed.
Nobody had ever heard of Aung San Suu Kyi or Carlos Belo, and the attention really does do some good there.
They gain international support for ongoing work.
Sometimes it has gone to people who have genuinely done good work and deserve to be rewarded in retrospect, as it is in the science prizes.On the other hand, some years have been completely out of line, such as Kissinger or Obama.
(I'm a big fan of Obama, but the peace prize was completely unnecessary: he needed neither encouragement nor money to do his work.
There were other people who could use the attention and money to better effect, and he had no accomplishments of note.
)In other words: a mixed bag.
I suppose that the worst failures do little harm, and the successes do some good, so it's worth it.
Even if it means putting up with the occasional simultaneous international facepalm.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046542</id>
	<title>inspirational theme song</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265481300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Reach out and hack someone... Reach out and flame someone..."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Reach out and hack someone... Reach out and flame someone... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Reach out and hack someone... Reach out and flame someone..."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31061502</id>
	<title>Logic behind the nobel peace prize</title>
	<author>jasper\_amsterdam</author>
	<datestamp>1265650320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If everyone in the world would watch porn, there would be no more war...</htmltext>
<tokenext>If everyone in the world would watch porn , there would be no more war.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If everyone in the world would watch porn, there would be no more war...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046658</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1265482320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More importantly - which of the individuals wearing Guy Fawkes mask gives the acceptance speech and gets the price?</p><p>Hm, a plot to shatter them?...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More importantly - which of the individuals wearing Guy Fawkes mask gives the acceptance speech and gets the price ? Hm , a plot to shatter them ? .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More importantly - which of the individuals wearing Guy Fawkes mask gives the acceptance speech and gets the price?Hm, a plot to shatter them?...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047784</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265449380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MSFT! They explored it and made it available to everyone.</p><p>Who's it gonna be next year? Lisa Simpson for wishing for World Peace in several episodes?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MSFT !
They explored it and made it available to everyone.Who 's it gon na be next year ?
Lisa Simpson for wishing for World Peace in several episodes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MSFT!
They explored it and made it available to everyone.Who's it gonna be next year?
Lisa Simpson for wishing for World Peace in several episodes?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048114</id>
	<title>This is not fair.</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1265452920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is like giving the telephone a nobel peace prize.
</p><p>
The prize should not be awarded to the medium, but to actual people....
</p><p>
The internet is not a person, as a result, they can never show up to claim their prize.
</p><p>
I would support giving a Nobel prize to  Jon Postel, (but unfortunately he's dead and therefore inelligible),  Tim Berners lee, and others,  such as  Linus Torvalds, Mark Zuckerburg, or  <em>shudder</em>  Bill Gates.
</p><p>
Before the internet can get a nobel peace prize, computers, and their operating systems should, since they are a pre-requisite and even more crucial to bringing peace<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is like giving the telephone a nobel peace prize .
The prize should not be awarded to the medium , but to actual people... . The internet is not a person , as a result , they can never show up to claim their prize .
I would support giving a Nobel prize to Jon Postel , ( but unfortunately he 's dead and therefore inelligible ) , Tim Berners lee , and others , such as Linus Torvalds , Mark Zuckerburg , or shudder Bill Gates .
Before the internet can get a nobel peace prize , computers , and their operating systems should , since they are a pre-requisite and even more crucial to bringing peace : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is like giving the telephone a nobel peace prize.
The prize should not be awarded to the medium, but to actual people....

The internet is not a person, as a result, they can never show up to claim their prize.
I would support giving a Nobel prize to  Jon Postel, (but unfortunately he's dead and therefore inelligible),  Tim Berners lee, and others,  such as  Linus Torvalds, Mark Zuckerburg, or  shudder  Bill Gates.
Before the internet can get a nobel peace prize, computers, and their operating systems should, since they are a pre-requisite and even more crucial to bringing peace :)
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31050260</id>
	<title>Re:Internet is a TOOL used for peace and war...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265476320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, considering that Nobel's money came from Dynamite - a tool that has been used for good and evil purposes - it would seem fitting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , considering that Nobel 's money came from Dynamite - a tool that has been used for good and evil purposes - it would seem fitting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, considering that Nobel's money came from Dynamite - a tool that has been used for good and evil purposes - it would seem fitting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31068184</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>drkim</author>
	<datestamp>1265643600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I believe it would have to go to DARPA since they 'made' it. If it was to the "World Wide Web" (instead of the "Internet") it would probably go to Tim Berners-Lee or CERN.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe it would have to go to DARPA since they 'made ' it .
If it was to the " World Wide Web " ( instead of the " Internet " ) it would probably go to Tim Berners-Lee or CERN .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe it would have to go to DARPA since they 'made' it.
If it was to the "World Wide Web" (instead of the "Internet") it would probably go to Tim Berners-Lee or CERN.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046474</id>
	<title>The speech</title>
	<author>K. S. Kyosuke</author>
	<datestamp>1265480880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Internet has decided to present its acceptance speech in form of a Twitter live feed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Internet has decided to present its acceptance speech in form of a Twitter live feed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Internet has decided to present its acceptance speech in form of a Twitter live feed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046668</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265482320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My guess, if the internet wins the Nobel Peace Prize, the money will go toward internet infrastructure in poor countries with a violence problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My guess , if the internet wins the Nobel Peace Prize , the money will go toward internet infrastructure in poor countries with a violence problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My guess, if the internet wins the Nobel Peace Prize, the money will go toward internet infrastructure in poor countries with a violence problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047416</id>
	<title>are you kidding?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265489340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>miscommunication can kill.<br>and internet just speeds this up sometimes...</p><p>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,312018,00.html<br>http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577\_3-10278483-36.html</p><p>if the Internet receives a Peace Prize, it can dedicate the award to all harassed teenagers with justin.tv suicide footage showing in the background.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>miscommunication can kill.and internet just speeds this up sometimes...http : //www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,312018,00.htmlhttp : //news.cnet.com/8301-13577 \ _3-10278483-36.htmlif the Internet receives a Peace Prize , it can dedicate the award to all harassed teenagers with justin.tv suicide footage showing in the background .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>miscommunication can kill.and internet just speeds this up sometimes...http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,312018,00.htmlhttp://news.cnet.com/8301-13577\_3-10278483-36.htmlif the Internet receives a Peace Prize, it can dedicate the award to all harassed teenagers with justin.tv suicide footage showing in the background.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31050220</id>
	<title>The Internet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265475660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank you, thank you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you , thank you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you, thank you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046504</id>
	<title>irony</title>
	<author>Lord Ender</author>
	<datestamp>1265481060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The US department of defense will be accepting the award, as they funded the first tubes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The US department of defense will be accepting the award , as they funded the first tubes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The US department of defense will be accepting the award, as they funded the first tubes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046860</id>
	<title>Re:While the internet has done a good bit for peac</title>
	<author>nsayer</author>
	<datestamp>1265483880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Rather than giving it to him, give it to someone who worked to make sure McCain didn't get elected</p></div><p>You know, folks like you told me over and over again during 2008 that if I voted for McCain that we'd wind up having more troops sent to Iraq and Afghanistan, and they were absolutely right. I did vote for McCain and sure enough.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rather than giving it to him , give it to someone who worked to make sure McCain did n't get electedYou know , folks like you told me over and over again during 2008 that if I voted for McCain that we 'd wind up having more troops sent to Iraq and Afghanistan , and they were absolutely right .
I did vote for McCain and sure enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Rather than giving it to him, give it to someone who worked to make sure McCain didn't get electedYou know, folks like you told me over and over again during 2008 that if I voted for McCain that we'd wind up having more troops sent to Iraq and Afghanistan, and they were absolutely right.
I did vote for McCain and sure enough.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046528</id>
	<title>If an idiot got the award for doing nothing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265481180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If Obama  got the award for DOING NOTHING, why not give it to an communication system?</p><p>Seriously, if the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:"Internet" wins the award, it will be the same as when Obama won it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If Obama got the award for DOING NOTHING , why not give it to an communication system ? Seriously , if the : " Internet " wins the award , it will be the same as when Obama won it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Obama  got the award for DOING NOTHING, why not give it to an communication system?Seriously, if the :"Internet" wins the award, it will be the same as when Obama won it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047650</id>
	<title>Awesome</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265448240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now I can reason any random quote with "A nobel peace price laureate said it".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now I can reason any random quote with " A nobel peace price laureate said it " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now I can reason any random quote with "A nobel peace price laureate said it".
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046510</id>
	<title>woo hooo!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265481060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally, pr0n might win a Nobel prize!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , pr0n might win a Nobel prize !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, pr0n might win a Nobel prize!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31056386</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>ThakurSherSingh</author>
	<datestamp>1265549460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Indo-Pak war was helped averted by The Internet/World Wide Web after 26/11!

1.Not many analysts are aware of the powerful role played by the Internet/world wide web in helping avert the Indo-Pak War in the aftermath of the Mumbai's 26/11 terror attack.

2.How was this achieved?Well, When Most of the Indians and all major Indian political parties seemed to be favouring an attack on Pakistan then,which would have resulted SURELY into the Indo-Pak War then there were saner voices like us who carried out relentless campaign against the WAR APPROACH by making effective use of the Internet/World Wide Web to moblize support against this mad war approach. We sent our emails to TV channels and also put on my MSN blog THE DANGERS/PITFALLS OF THIS WAR APPROACH AND ADVOCATED PEACEFUL DIPLOMATIC APPROACH TO HAMMER OUT THE SOLUTION. ITS AN OPEN SECRET THAT THE WEB BLOGS LIKE MINE WERE BEING MONITORED BY VARIOUS INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES INCLUDING THE INDIAN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES AND DECISION-TAKERS/POLITICIANS/INDIAN MEDIA PERSONNEL, WHICH IN TURN HELPED ALL THESE PEOPLE CONCLUDE AGAINST GOING FOR A WAR AGAINST PAKISTAN, THEREBY ACHIEVING PEACE IN THE INDIAN SUB-CONTINENT...NOW, I COULD INFLUENCE DIRECTLY/INDIRECTLY THE THINKING OF THOSE AT THE HELM OF THE AFFAIRS OF THE INDIAN POLITY THEN SIMPLY BECAUSE OF THE EASE AND QUICKNESS PROVIDED TO ME BY THIS POWERFUL AND MONETARILY CHEAPEST TOOL OF COMMUNICATION CALLED THE INTERNET/WORLD WIDE WEB....!

3. To cite just one example, go through my following blog-piece:

INDO-PAK WAR NOT THE PERMANENT SOLUTION TO TERRORISM IN INDIA...!?
From:     Geography (geography@groups.msn.com)
Sent:     04 December 2008 17:53PM
To:     Geography (geography@groups.msn.com)
    New Message on Geography

    INDO-PAK WAR NOT THE PERMANENT SOLUTION TO TERRORISM IN INDIA...!?

    Reply

          Recommend     Message 1 in Discussion
    From: shersingh


    INDO-PAK WAR NOT THE PERMANENT SOLUTION TO TERRORISM IN INDIA...!?
    From: shersingh parmar (shersinghparmar@hotmail.com)
    Sent: 04 December 2008 17:51PM
    To: newsroom@timesnow.tv; shersinghparmar@hotmail.com

    INDO-PAK WAR NOT THE PERMANENT SOLUTION TO TERRORISM IN INDIA



    1. The INDO-PAK WAR is not going to be the permanent solution to the problem of terrorism being faced by Indian COMMON CITIZENS! INDIA HAS FOUGHT 3 MAJOR WARS WITH PAKISTAN in addition to the KARGIL INTRUSION of 1999.
    2. UNDERSTANDABLY, THE ENRAGED PEOPLE OF MUMBAI ARE ADVOCATING ACTION AGAINST PAKISTAN IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE MUMBAI&rsquo;s 26/11.BUT, SHALL COMMON INDIAN CITIZENS ACHIEVE OUT OF WAR WITH PAKISTAN? OUR DEFENCE FORCES SHALL GO , ATTACK PAKISTAN, DEFEAT PAKISTAN.BUT, IN THE PROCESS BOTH INDIAN AND PAKISTANI CITIZENS SHALL SUFFER UNTOLD HUMAN MISERIES/ECONOMIC HARDSHIPS IN TERMS OF DEATHS OF HUMANS[MILITARY/INNOCENT CIVILIANS]/DESTRUCTION OF ECONOMIES..AGAIN, OUR INDIAN POLITICAL/BUREAUCRATIC ESTABLISHMENT HAND BACK TO PAKISTAN ALL THE CONQUERED PAKISTANI AREAS THE WAY THEY DID IN 1971 WAR WITH PAKISTANSO, WHO SHALL BE THE REAL SUFFERER?NOT THE INDIAN POLITICIAN, NOT THE INDIAN BUREAUCRAT.BUT, THE REAL SUFFERER SHALL BE THE COMMON INDIAN CIVILIAN AND THE INDIAN DEFENCE PERSONNEL..!
    3. SO, we COMMON INDIANS MUST KEEP OUR HEADS COOL, PRESSURISE OUR INDIAN POLITICAL/BUREAUCRATIC ESTABLISHMENT TO BECOME TOTALLY CLEAN,NON-CORRUPT,EFFECTIVE,PATRIOTIC,HONEST,EFFICIENT AND WE MUST MAKE THIS ESTABLISHMENT TO DISPLAY EXEMPLARY DIPLOMATIC/POLITICAL SKILLS IN DEALING FIRMLY WITH PAKISTAN WITHOUT ANY HUMAN/ECONOMIC LOSSES TO INDIA.THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF WAYS TO ACHIEVE THIS GOAL WITHOUT GOING INTO A WAR WITH PAKISTAN.LET US MAKE OUR INDIAN ESTABLISHMENT TOTALLY ACCOUNTABLE AND TRANSPARENTHOW COULD ANYONE DARE TERRORISE INDIA IF INDIA ITSELF WERE AND PERCEIVED AS SUCH BY OTHERS TO BE UNITED AND STRONG ON ALL FRONTS?
    4. I APPRECIATE INDIAN MEDIA&rsquo;s ROLE IN REAWAKENING THE COMMON INDIANS, ESPECIALLY THOSE LIVING IN METROPOLIS.BUT, LET ME SPEAK THE TRUTH BLUNTLY TO INDIAN MEDIA.YOUR THIS CORRECT EFFORT SHALL GET FORGOTTEN AFTER 1-2-3 MONTHS.SO, IF THE INDI</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Indo-Pak war was helped averted by The Internet/World Wide Web after 26/11 !
1.Not many analysts are aware of the powerful role played by the Internet/world wide web in helping avert the Indo-Pak War in the aftermath of the Mumbai 's 26/11 terror attack .
2.How was this achieved ? Well , When Most of the Indians and all major Indian political parties seemed to be favouring an attack on Pakistan then,which would have resulted SURELY into the Indo-Pak War then there were saner voices like us who carried out relentless campaign against the WAR APPROACH by making effective use of the Internet/World Wide Web to moblize support against this mad war approach .
We sent our emails to TV channels and also put on my MSN blog THE DANGERS/PITFALLS OF THIS WAR APPROACH AND ADVOCATED PEACEFUL DIPLOMATIC APPROACH TO HAMMER OUT THE SOLUTION .
ITS AN OPEN SECRET THAT THE WEB BLOGS LIKE MINE WERE BEING MONITORED BY VARIOUS INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES INCLUDING THE INDIAN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES AND DECISION-TAKERS/POLITICIANS/INDIAN MEDIA PERSONNEL , WHICH IN TURN HELPED ALL THESE PEOPLE CONCLUDE AGAINST GOING FOR A WAR AGAINST PAKISTAN , THEREBY ACHIEVING PEACE IN THE INDIAN SUB-CONTINENT...NOW , I COULD INFLUENCE DIRECTLY/INDIRECTLY THE THINKING OF THOSE AT THE HELM OF THE AFFAIRS OF THE INDIAN POLITY THEN SIMPLY BECAUSE OF THE EASE AND QUICKNESS PROVIDED TO ME BY THIS POWERFUL AND MONETARILY CHEAPEST TOOL OF COMMUNICATION CALLED THE INTERNET/WORLD WIDE WEB.... !
3. To cite just one example , go through my following blog-piece : INDO-PAK WAR NOT THE PERMANENT SOLUTION TO TERRORISM IN INDIA... ! ?
From : Geography ( geography @ groups.msn.com ) Sent : 04 December 2008 17 : 53PM To : Geography ( geography @ groups.msn.com ) New Message on Geography INDO-PAK WAR NOT THE PERMANENT SOLUTION TO TERRORISM IN INDIA... ! ?
Reply Recommend Message 1 in Discussion From : shersingh INDO-PAK WAR NOT THE PERMANENT SOLUTION TO TERRORISM IN INDIA... ! ?
From : shersingh parmar ( shersinghparmar @ hotmail.com ) Sent : 04 December 2008 17 : 51PM To : newsroom @ timesnow.tv ; shersinghparmar @ hotmail.com INDO-PAK WAR NOT THE PERMANENT SOLUTION TO TERRORISM IN INDIA 1 .
The INDO-PAK WAR is not going to be the permanent solution to the problem of terrorism being faced by Indian COMMON CITIZENS !
INDIA HAS FOUGHT 3 MAJOR WARS WITH PAKISTAN in addition to the KARGIL INTRUSION of 1999 .
2. UNDERSTANDABLY , THE ENRAGED PEOPLE OF MUMBAI ARE ADVOCATING ACTION AGAINST PAKISTAN IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE MUMBAI    s 26/11.BUT , SHALL COMMON INDIAN CITIZENS ACHIEVE OUT OF WAR WITH PAKISTAN ?
OUR DEFENCE FORCES SHALL GO , ATTACK PAKISTAN , DEFEAT PAKISTAN.BUT , IN THE PROCESS BOTH INDIAN AND PAKISTANI CITIZENS SHALL SUFFER UNTOLD HUMAN MISERIES/ECONOMIC HARDSHIPS IN TERMS OF DEATHS OF HUMANS [ MILITARY/INNOCENT CIVILIANS ] /DESTRUCTION OF ECONOMIES..AGAIN , OUR INDIAN POLITICAL/BUREAUCRATIC ESTABLISHMENT HAND BACK TO PAKISTAN ALL THE CONQUERED PAKISTANI AREAS THE WAY THEY DID IN 1971 WAR WITH PAKISTANSO , WHO SHALL BE THE REAL SUFFERER ? NOT THE INDIAN POLITICIAN , NOT THE INDIAN BUREAUCRAT.BUT , THE REAL SUFFERER SHALL BE THE COMMON INDIAN CIVILIAN AND THE INDIAN DEFENCE PERSONNEL.. !
3. SO , we COMMON INDIANS MUST KEEP OUR HEADS COOL , PRESSURISE OUR INDIAN POLITICAL/BUREAUCRATIC ESTABLISHMENT TO BECOME TOTALLY CLEAN,NON-CORRUPT,EFFECTIVE,PATRIOTIC,HONEST,EFFICIENT AND WE MUST MAKE THIS ESTABLISHMENT TO DISPLAY EXEMPLARY DIPLOMATIC/POLITICAL SKILLS IN DEALING FIRMLY WITH PAKISTAN WITHOUT ANY HUMAN/ECONOMIC LOSSES TO INDIA.THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF WAYS TO ACHIEVE THIS GOAL WITHOUT GOING INTO A WAR WITH PAKISTAN.LET US MAKE OUR INDIAN ESTABLISHMENT TOTALLY ACCOUNTABLE AND TRANSPARENTHOW COULD ANYONE DARE TERRORISE INDIA IF INDIA ITSELF WERE AND PERCEIVED AS SUCH BY OTHERS TO BE UNITED AND STRONG ON ALL FRONTS ?
4. I APPRECIATE INDIAN MEDIA    s ROLE IN REAWAKENING THE COMMON INDIANS , ESPECIALLY THOSE LIVING IN METROPOLIS.BUT , LET ME SPEAK THE TRUTH BLUNTLY TO INDIAN MEDIA.YOUR THIS CORRECT EFFORT SHALL GET FORGOTTEN AFTER 1-2-3 MONTHS.SO , IF THE INDI</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Indo-Pak war was helped averted by The Internet/World Wide Web after 26/11!
1.Not many analysts are aware of the powerful role played by the Internet/world wide web in helping avert the Indo-Pak War in the aftermath of the Mumbai's 26/11 terror attack.
2.How was this achieved?Well, When Most of the Indians and all major Indian political parties seemed to be favouring an attack on Pakistan then,which would have resulted SURELY into the Indo-Pak War then there were saner voices like us who carried out relentless campaign against the WAR APPROACH by making effective use of the Internet/World Wide Web to moblize support against this mad war approach.
We sent our emails to TV channels and also put on my MSN blog THE DANGERS/PITFALLS OF THIS WAR APPROACH AND ADVOCATED PEACEFUL DIPLOMATIC APPROACH TO HAMMER OUT THE SOLUTION.
ITS AN OPEN SECRET THAT THE WEB BLOGS LIKE MINE WERE BEING MONITORED BY VARIOUS INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES INCLUDING THE INDIAN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES AND DECISION-TAKERS/POLITICIANS/INDIAN MEDIA PERSONNEL, WHICH IN TURN HELPED ALL THESE PEOPLE CONCLUDE AGAINST GOING FOR A WAR AGAINST PAKISTAN, THEREBY ACHIEVING PEACE IN THE INDIAN SUB-CONTINENT...NOW, I COULD INFLUENCE DIRECTLY/INDIRECTLY THE THINKING OF THOSE AT THE HELM OF THE AFFAIRS OF THE INDIAN POLITY THEN SIMPLY BECAUSE OF THE EASE AND QUICKNESS PROVIDED TO ME BY THIS POWERFUL AND MONETARILY CHEAPEST TOOL OF COMMUNICATION CALLED THE INTERNET/WORLD WIDE WEB....!
3. To cite just one example, go through my following blog-piece:

INDO-PAK WAR NOT THE PERMANENT SOLUTION TO TERRORISM IN INDIA...!?
From:     Geography (geography@groups.msn.com)
Sent:     04 December 2008 17:53PM
To:     Geography (geography@groups.msn.com)
    New Message on Geography

    INDO-PAK WAR NOT THE PERMANENT SOLUTION TO TERRORISM IN INDIA...!?
Reply

          Recommend     Message 1 in Discussion
    From: shersingh


    INDO-PAK WAR NOT THE PERMANENT SOLUTION TO TERRORISM IN INDIA...!?
From: shersingh parmar (shersinghparmar@hotmail.com)
    Sent: 04 December 2008 17:51PM
    To: newsroom@timesnow.tv; shersinghparmar@hotmail.com

    INDO-PAK WAR NOT THE PERMANENT SOLUTION TO TERRORISM IN INDIA



    1.
The INDO-PAK WAR is not going to be the permanent solution to the problem of terrorism being faced by Indian COMMON CITIZENS!
INDIA HAS FOUGHT 3 MAJOR WARS WITH PAKISTAN in addition to the KARGIL INTRUSION of 1999.
2. UNDERSTANDABLY, THE ENRAGED PEOPLE OF MUMBAI ARE ADVOCATING ACTION AGAINST PAKISTAN IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE MUMBAI’s 26/11.BUT, SHALL COMMON INDIAN CITIZENS ACHIEVE OUT OF WAR WITH PAKISTAN?
OUR DEFENCE FORCES SHALL GO , ATTACK PAKISTAN, DEFEAT PAKISTAN.BUT, IN THE PROCESS BOTH INDIAN AND PAKISTANI CITIZENS SHALL SUFFER UNTOLD HUMAN MISERIES/ECONOMIC HARDSHIPS IN TERMS OF DEATHS OF HUMANS[MILITARY/INNOCENT CIVILIANS]/DESTRUCTION OF ECONOMIES..AGAIN, OUR INDIAN POLITICAL/BUREAUCRATIC ESTABLISHMENT HAND BACK TO PAKISTAN ALL THE CONQUERED PAKISTANI AREAS THE WAY THEY DID IN 1971 WAR WITH PAKISTANSO, WHO SHALL BE THE REAL SUFFERER?NOT THE INDIAN POLITICIAN, NOT THE INDIAN BUREAUCRAT.BUT, THE REAL SUFFERER SHALL BE THE COMMON INDIAN CIVILIAN AND THE INDIAN DEFENCE PERSONNEL..!
3. SO, we COMMON INDIANS MUST KEEP OUR HEADS COOL, PRESSURISE OUR INDIAN POLITICAL/BUREAUCRATIC ESTABLISHMENT TO BECOME TOTALLY CLEAN,NON-CORRUPT,EFFECTIVE,PATRIOTIC,HONEST,EFFICIENT AND WE MUST MAKE THIS ESTABLISHMENT TO DISPLAY EXEMPLARY DIPLOMATIC/POLITICAL SKILLS IN DEALING FIRMLY WITH PAKISTAN WITHOUT ANY HUMAN/ECONOMIC LOSSES TO INDIA.THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF WAYS TO ACHIEVE THIS GOAL WITHOUT GOING INTO A WAR WITH PAKISTAN.LET US MAKE OUR INDIAN ESTABLISHMENT TOTALLY ACCOUNTABLE AND TRANSPARENTHOW COULD ANYONE DARE TERRORISE INDIA IF INDIA ITSELF WERE AND PERCEIVED AS SUCH BY OTHERS TO BE UNITED AND STRONG ON ALL FRONTS?
4. I APPRECIATE INDIAN MEDIA’s ROLE IN REAWAKENING THE COMMON INDIANS, ESPECIALLY THOSE LIVING IN METROPOLIS.BUT, LET ME SPEAK THE TRUTH BLUNTLY TO INDIAN MEDIA.YOUR THIS CORRECT EFFORT SHALL GET FORGOTTEN AFTER 1-2-3 MONTHS.SO, IF THE INDI</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047824</id>
	<title>Oblig</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265449740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Soviet Sweeden, Internet wins you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Soviet Sweeden , Internet wins you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Soviet Sweeden, Internet wins you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047358</id>
	<title>What's going on?</title>
	<author>D. Taylor</author>
	<datestamp>1265488740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Has the Nobel Peace Prize jumped the shark along with everything else?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has the Nobel Peace Prize jumped the shark along with everything else ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has the Nobel Peace Prize jumped the shark along with everything else?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046618</id>
	<title>The Internet will start a war</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265481960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It looks like the internet is the perfect breeding ground for paranoia and fear of China.<br>The capacity of the american public for whipping themselves into a warmongering state of fear is helped by quick and easy communication with like minded paranoiacs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks like the internet is the perfect breeding ground for paranoia and fear of China.The capacity of the american public for whipping themselves into a warmongering state of fear is helped by quick and easy communication with like minded paranoiacs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks like the internet is the perfect breeding ground for paranoia and fear of China.The capacity of the american public for whipping themselves into a warmongering state of fear is helped by quick and easy communication with like minded paranoiacs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047674</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265448420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hate you too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate you too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate you too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049952</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Random BedHead Ed</author>
	<datestamp>1265472600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>who would get the cash prize?  Please don't tell me it's "anonymous".  I hate that guy.</p></div><p>I think it's obvious that we'd all get a cut.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>who would get the cash prize ?
Please do n't tell me it 's " anonymous " .
I hate that guy.I think it 's obvious that we 'd all get a cut .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>who would get the cash prize?
Please don't tell me it's "anonymous".
I hate that guy.I think it's obvious that we'd all get a cut.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046970</id>
	<title>Re:Fail</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1265484960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because the Internet has a property that none of those other options have: It&rsquo;s the first time in history, that the general public has a intelligence agency more powerful than anything else on the world.</p><p>But hey, the Internet getting a prize, and other things getting it, are no mutually exclusive concepts. So your &ldquo;argument&rdquo; is moot anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because the Internet has a property that none of those other options have : It    s the first time in history , that the general public has a intelligence agency more powerful than anything else on the world.But hey , the Internet getting a prize , and other things getting it , are no mutually exclusive concepts .
So your    argument    is moot anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because the Internet has a property that none of those other options have: It’s the first time in history, that the general public has a intelligence agency more powerful than anything else on the world.But hey, the Internet getting a prize, and other things getting it, are no mutually exclusive concepts.
So your “argument” is moot anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047618</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265448000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It will be an inanimate carbon rod</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It will be an inanimate carbon rod</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will be an inanimate carbon rod</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31056472</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1265550180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was going to mod you down, but there was no "<b>-1 OMG WHY ARE YOU USING ALL CAPS?  MY EYES ARE BLEEDING</b>" selection.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was going to mod you down , but there was no " -1 OMG WHY ARE YOU USING ALL CAPS ?
MY EYES ARE BLEEDING " selection .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was going to mod you down, but there was no "-1 OMG WHY ARE YOU USING ALL CAPS?
MY EYES ARE BLEEDING" selection.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31056386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047628</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>bxwatso</author>
	<datestamp>1265448060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>who would get the cash prize?  Please don't tell me it's "anonymous".  I hate that guy.</p></div><p>I think the money will go to this deposed Nigerian prince who needs seed money to collect his inheritance.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>who would get the cash prize ?
Please do n't tell me it 's " anonymous " .
I hate that guy.I think the money will go to this deposed Nigerian prince who needs seed money to collect his inheritance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>who would get the cash prize?
Please don't tell me it's "anonymous".
I hate that guy.I think the money will go to this deposed Nigerian prince who needs seed money to collect his inheritance.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046704</id>
	<title>Re:Fail</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265482620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The telegraph enabled communication on a very limited level compared to the Internet. The press, and for the most part radio are broadcasting methods.</p><p>What I think the Internet brought is the ability for people from different continents (as we probably are) to easily talk to each other, and realize that there are people on the other side of the globe too, and that civilization doesn't end at their country's border.</p><p>Yeah, you could do that with the phone and telegraph as well, but you couldn't just happen to converse with somebody without having a prior reason for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The telegraph enabled communication on a very limited level compared to the Internet .
The press , and for the most part radio are broadcasting methods.What I think the Internet brought is the ability for people from different continents ( as we probably are ) to easily talk to each other , and realize that there are people on the other side of the globe too , and that civilization does n't end at their country 's border.Yeah , you could do that with the phone and telegraph as well , but you could n't just happen to converse with somebody without having a prior reason for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The telegraph enabled communication on a very limited level compared to the Internet.
The press, and for the most part radio are broadcasting methods.What I think the Internet brought is the ability for people from different continents (as we probably are) to easily talk to each other, and realize that there are people on the other side of the globe too, and that civilization doesn't end at their country's border.Yeah, you could do that with the phone and telegraph as well, but you couldn't just happen to converse with somebody without having a prior reason for it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046994</id>
	<title>Nobel peace prize</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265485200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext> has become a joke.</htmltext>
<tokenext>has become a joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> has become a joke.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047268</id>
	<title>But how can it accept?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265487660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How can the Internet *accept* the award though? I mean, it's nothing more than a series of tubes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How can the Internet * accept * the award though ?
I mean , it 's nothing more than a series of tubes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can the Internet *accept* the award though?
I mean, it's nothing more than a series of tubes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31061176</id>
	<title>Re:If we can nominate the Internet ...</title>
	<author>RivenAleem</author>
	<datestamp>1265648760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Haven't oceans been responsible for uncounted numbers of deaths of innocent civilians?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have n't oceans been responsible for uncounted numbers of deaths of innocent civilians ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Haven't oceans been responsible for uncounted numbers of deaths of innocent civilians?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046728</id>
	<title>Re:Fail</title>
	<author>kandela</author>
	<datestamp>1265482920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Chinese are trying to expel the internet, the telegraph never did enough to provoke that reaction, and I believe it's a requirement now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Chinese are trying to expel the internet , the telegraph never did enough to provoke that reaction , and I believe it 's a requirement now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Chinese are trying to expel the internet, the telegraph never did enough to provoke that reaction, and I believe it's a requirement now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046836</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>Bragador</author>
	<datestamp>1265483700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I have always thought that Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World-Wide-Web, is deserving of a Peace Prize.[...] Awarding the Peace Prize to a thing?  Ugh.  Don't get me started.  Awarding the Prize to organizations is silly enough already.</p></div><p>Tom: Uh, how'd you solve the door dilemma? </p><p>Buzz: Homer Simpson was the real hero here.  He jury-rigged the door
          closed using this. </p><p>Man 1: Hey, what is that? </p><p>Man 2: It's an inanimate carbon rod! </p><p>Everyone: Yay! </p><p>[Time magazine cover: "In Rod We Trust"] </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have always thought that Tim Berners-Lee , inventor of the World-Wide-Web , is deserving of a Peace Prize. [ .. .
] Awarding the Peace Prize to a thing ?
Ugh. Do n't get me started .
Awarding the Prize to organizations is silly enough already.Tom : Uh , how 'd you solve the door dilemma ?
Buzz : Homer Simpson was the real hero here .
He jury-rigged the door closed using this .
Man 1 : Hey , what is that ?
Man 2 : It 's an inanimate carbon rod !
Everyone : Yay !
[ Time magazine cover : " In Rod We Trust " ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have always thought that Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World-Wide-Web, is deserving of a Peace Prize.[...
] Awarding the Peace Prize to a thing?
Ugh.  Don't get me started.
Awarding the Prize to organizations is silly enough already.Tom: Uh, how'd you solve the door dilemma?
Buzz: Homer Simpson was the real hero here.
He jury-rigged the door
          closed using this.
Man 1: Hey, what is that?
Man 2: It's an inanimate carbon rod!
Everyone: Yay!
[Time magazine cover: "In Rod We Trust"] 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049748</id>
	<title>Re:Decline of the Prize</title>
	<author>ajlisows</author>
	<datestamp>1265469540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah.  If I remember correctly "Time's Man of the Year" one year was the Personal Computer.  As far as the Peace Prize goes, I would say "The Internet" winning the prize would be pretty silly.  If four years of the Peace Prize have "International Panel on Climate Change", Barack Obama, and the Internet as three of the winners I would have to say it is rapidly becoming "The Nobel What has been popular/newsworthy this year Prize". </p><p>Perhaps it is time that they consider not trying to find someone worthy of the prize every year, but begin considering if anyone is worthy of the prize.  If not....no Nobel Peace Prize for that cycle.  They did suspend the Peace Prize during much of WWII.  The situation would be different but the idea is the same.  I believe this would prevent the prize from becoming a watered down version of what they want it to be.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah .
If I remember correctly " Time 's Man of the Year " one year was the Personal Computer .
As far as the Peace Prize goes , I would say " The Internet " winning the prize would be pretty silly .
If four years of the Peace Prize have " International Panel on Climate Change " , Barack Obama , and the Internet as three of the winners I would have to say it is rapidly becoming " The Nobel What has been popular/newsworthy this year Prize " .
Perhaps it is time that they consider not trying to find someone worthy of the prize every year , but begin considering if anyone is worthy of the prize .
If not....no Nobel Peace Prize for that cycle .
They did suspend the Peace Prize during much of WWII .
The situation would be different but the idea is the same .
I believe this would prevent the prize from becoming a watered down version of what they want it to be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah.
If I remember correctly "Time's Man of the Year" one year was the Personal Computer.
As far as the Peace Prize goes, I would say "The Internet" winning the prize would be pretty silly.
If four years of the Peace Prize have "International Panel on Climate Change", Barack Obama, and the Internet as three of the winners I would have to say it is rapidly becoming "The Nobel What has been popular/newsworthy this year Prize".
Perhaps it is time that they consider not trying to find someone worthy of the prize every year, but begin considering if anyone is worthy of the prize.
If not....no Nobel Peace Prize for that cycle.
They did suspend the Peace Prize during much of WWII.
The situation would be different but the idea is the same.
I believe this would prevent the prize from becoming a watered down version of what they want it to be.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049324</id>
	<title>Re:Soo....</title>
	<author>sneilan</author>
	<datestamp>1265464200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>My guess, if the internet wins the Nobel Peace Prize, the money will go toward internet infrastructure in poor countries with a violence problem.</p></div><p>How the hell is this score 5 insightful?

This system so stupid.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My guess , if the internet wins the Nobel Peace Prize , the money will go toward internet infrastructure in poor countries with a violence problem.How the hell is this score 5 insightful ?
This system so stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My guess, if the internet wins the Nobel Peace Prize, the money will go toward internet infrastructure in poor countries with a violence problem.How the hell is this score 5 insightful?
This system so stupid.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046668</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31050152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047826
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047742
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046836
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047460
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047144
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048162
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046658
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31061176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31052868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31056386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31056472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046776
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046574
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047564
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31059604
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047618
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31068184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31052918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31062672
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31052382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31050260
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31051548
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047784
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047022
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047352
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31054512
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048336
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_161202_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046828
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049748
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047352
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047682
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046924
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046648
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046712
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047826
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046474
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046776
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31052382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047022
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047784
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31056386
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31056472
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31051548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047188
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31054512
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046938
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31050152
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31052918
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048336
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046658
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31059604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046668
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049324
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047144
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046858
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31062672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31052868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31068184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047618
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047218
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31061176
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047358
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046574
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046878
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046774
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046592
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31050260
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31050220
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046532
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046780
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048380
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047004
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046554
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046764
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049666
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31048622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31049156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047306
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046986
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046732
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046528
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046580
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_161202.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31046824
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_161202.31047494
</commentlist>
</conversation>
