<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_05_163253</id>
	<title>Mentioning Android Is a No-No In iPhone App Store</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1265388120000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>donberryman writes <i>"Apple has told a software developer that its application cannot be included in the iPhone App Store if it <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/05/apple\_slaps\_iphone\_app\_for\_mentioning\_google\_android/">mentions Google Android</a>. The developer just wanted to mention that the app was a finalist in Google's Android Developer's Challenge."</i> The developer complied with apparent good humor. Here is <a href="http://flash-of-genius.com/blog/?p=8">their blog post</a>, which includes the text of the iPhone store's not-quite-rejection.</htmltext>
<tokenext>donberryman writes " Apple has told a software developer that its application can not be included in the iPhone App Store if it mentions Google Android .
The developer just wanted to mention that the app was a finalist in Google 's Android Developer 's Challenge .
" The developer complied with apparent good humor .
Here is their blog post , which includes the text of the iPhone store 's not-quite-rejection .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>donberryman writes "Apple has told a software developer that its application cannot be included in the iPhone App Store if it mentions Google Android.
The developer just wanted to mention that the app was a finalist in Google's Android Developer's Challenge.
" The developer complied with apparent good humor.
Here is their blog post, which includes the text of the iPhone store's not-quite-rejection.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035778</id>
	<title>The wording of Apple's reply</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265391960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The wording of Apple's reply is a gem in and of itself:</p><p><i>While your <b>application has not been rejected</b>, it would be appropriate  to remove &ldquo;Finalist in Google&rsquo;s Android Developer&rsquo;s Challenge!&rdquo;  from the Application Description.</i></p><p><i>Please log into iTunes Connect to make appropriate changes to the Application Description now <b>to avoid an interruption in the availability</b> of Flash of Genius: SAT Vocab 2.2 on the iPhone App Store.</i></p><p>That's a nice app you have there; would be a shame if anything happened to it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The wording of Apple 's reply is a gem in and of itself : While your application has not been rejected , it would be appropriate to remove    Finalist in Google    s Android Developer    s Challenge !    from the Application Description.Please log into iTunes Connect to make appropriate changes to the Application Description now to avoid an interruption in the availability of Flash of Genius : SAT Vocab 2.2 on the iPhone App Store.That 's a nice app you have there ; would be a shame if anything happened to it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The wording of Apple's reply is a gem in and of itself:While your application has not been rejected, it would be appropriate  to remove “Finalist in Google’s Android Developer’s Challenge!”  from the Application Description.Please log into iTunes Connect to make appropriate changes to the Application Description now to avoid an interruption in the availability of Flash of Genius: SAT Vocab 2.2 on the iPhone App Store.That's a nice app you have there; would be a shame if anything happened to it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036502</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1265394840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've had it explained to me that it makes much more sense to build the metadata index on a powerful PC, rather than building the functionality into each mp3 player.</p><p>My $40 sandisk indexes a couple of gigabytes in about 10 seconds, so I scratched my head too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've had it explained to me that it makes much more sense to build the metadata index on a powerful PC , rather than building the functionality into each mp3 player.My $ 40 sandisk indexes a couple of gigabytes in about 10 seconds , so I scratched my head too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've had it explained to me that it makes much more sense to build the metadata index on a powerful PC, rather than building the functionality into each mp3 player.My $40 sandisk indexes a couple of gigabytes in about 10 seconds, so I scratched my head too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038266</id>
	<title>Don't worry, EU to the rescue</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265402580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure that EU will slam Apple because of this kind of practices, sonner or later. And I'm comfident that if that happens, people here will complain "Again the evil EU is just punishing American companies!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:'("</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure that EU will slam Apple because of this kind of practices , sonner or later .
And I 'm comfident that if that happens , people here will complain " Again the evil EU is just punishing American companies !
: ' ( "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure that EU will slam Apple because of this kind of practices, sonner or later.
And I'm comfident that if that happens, people here will complain "Again the evil EU is just punishing American companies!
:'("</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265393640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My mother gave my son a 32G iPod touch for Christmas. The iPod itself is a fantastic piece of gear but every time I have to launch iTunes to sync music into it I go on a 15 minute profanity riddled rant. iTunes is buggy, slow, and generally the biggest pile of shit software that I am forced to use. To say that I hate it with the intensity of a thousand burning stars would be an \_understatement\_.</p><p>Why, oh why, won't Apple let me push music to it like every other, non-Apple, media player that we own?</p><p>Steve Jobs deserves to be kicked in the DICK for this, hard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My mother gave my son a 32G iPod touch for Christmas .
The iPod itself is a fantastic piece of gear but every time I have to launch iTunes to sync music into it I go on a 15 minute profanity riddled rant .
iTunes is buggy , slow , and generally the biggest pile of shit software that I am forced to use .
To say that I hate it with the intensity of a thousand burning stars would be an \ _understatement \ _.Why , oh why , wo n't Apple let me push music to it like every other , non-Apple , media player that we own ? Steve Jobs deserves to be kicked in the DICK for this , hard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My mother gave my son a 32G iPod touch for Christmas.
The iPod itself is a fantastic piece of gear but every time I have to launch iTunes to sync music into it I go on a 15 minute profanity riddled rant.
iTunes is buggy, slow, and generally the biggest pile of shit software that I am forced to use.
To say that I hate it with the intensity of a thousand burning stars would be an \_understatement\_.Why, oh why, won't Apple let me push music to it like every other, non-Apple, media player that we own?Steve Jobs deserves to be kicked in the DICK for this, hard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31041028</id>
	<title>Re:No, but...</title>
	<author>Jackie\_Chan\_Fan</author>
	<datestamp>1265372760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree. The problem is, is that we let them slide because they're products are pretty and cool.</p><p>Its like getting a speeding ticket. If you're a fat ugly girl... you're getting a ticket. If you're a skinny hot blonde chick with big tits.... You can get away with murder.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
The problem is , is that we let them slide because they 're products are pretty and cool.Its like getting a speeding ticket .
If you 're a fat ugly girl... you 're getting a ticket .
If you 're a skinny hot blonde chick with big tits.... You can get away with murder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
The problem is, is that we let them slide because they're products are pretty and cool.Its like getting a speeding ticket.
If you're a fat ugly girl... you're getting a ticket.
If you're a skinny hot blonde chick with big tits.... You can get away with murder.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035788</id>
	<title>David or Goliath, Which One Today?</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1265392020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>So how is this developer's desire to port something from Android to the iPhone and advertise it different from Apple's desire to have <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1899" title="apple.com">Windows applications running on OSX</a> [apple.com] and actively advertise it?  <br> <br>


Oh, now I get it.  You push <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smartphone" title="wikipedia.org">the little guys around</a> [wikipedia.org] when you're the <a href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/the\_truth\_about\_apples\_iphone\_market\_share/" title="macobserver.com">big man on campus</a> [macobserver.com].  Certainly is interesting I can find <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/index?page=search&amp;src=support\_site.kbase.search&amp;locale=en\_US&amp;q=symbian" title="apple.com">literature about Symbian</a> [apple.com] on your site.  Tell me, if a very popular Symbian or Blackberry app was ported to the iPhone, would you allow the developer to advertise it?  Because I'm betting you would.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So how is this developer 's desire to port something from Android to the iPhone and advertise it different from Apple 's desire to have Windows applications running on OSX [ apple.com ] and actively advertise it ?
Oh , now I get it .
You push the little guys around [ wikipedia.org ] when you 're the big man on campus [ macobserver.com ] .
Certainly is interesting I can find literature about Symbian [ apple.com ] on your site .
Tell me , if a very popular Symbian or Blackberry app was ported to the iPhone , would you allow the developer to advertise it ?
Because I 'm betting you would .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So how is this developer's desire to port something from Android to the iPhone and advertise it different from Apple's desire to have Windows applications running on OSX [apple.com] and actively advertise it?
Oh, now I get it.
You push the little guys around [wikipedia.org] when you're the big man on campus [macobserver.com].
Certainly is interesting I can find literature about Symbian [apple.com] on your site.
Tell me, if a very popular Symbian or Blackberry app was ported to the iPhone, would you allow the developer to advertise it?
Because I'm betting you would.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038600</id>
	<title>This is newsworthy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265360880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is newsworthy? A non-story about a bunch of iPhone developer wankers? You guys really hard up today?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is newsworthy ?
A non-story about a bunch of iPhone developer wankers ?
You guys really hard up today ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is newsworthy?
A non-story about a bunch of iPhone developer wankers?
You guys really hard up today?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038012</id>
	<title>Re:Advertising... or not?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265401620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The weird thing is i saw an app named "MessageNow" which mentioned it could run on android and that isn't censored, i wonder why the difference...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The weird thing is i saw an app named " MessageNow " which mentioned it could run on android and that is n't censored , i wonder why the difference.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The weird thing is i saw an app named "MessageNow" which mentioned it could run on android and that isn't censored, i wonder why the difference...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040180</id>
	<title>Re:Shame on Apple for taking this route</title>
	<author>MemoryDragon</author>
	<datestamp>1265367960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wake up apple has been like that for several years now and it becomes worse and worse every year.<br>One of the reasons why I went for an android phone instead, still buy macs, but they are on the edge...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wake up apple has been like that for several years now and it becomes worse and worse every year.One of the reasons why I went for an android phone instead , still buy macs , but they are on the edge.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wake up apple has been like that for several years now and it becomes worse and worse every year.One of the reasons why I went for an android phone instead, still buy macs, but they are on the edge...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038624</id>
	<title>Doesn't seem to be stopping this App</title>
	<author>spinspin</author>
	<datestamp>1265360940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's called BrokeAndroid. It lets you smash up an android phone on your iPhone.
I guess it's ok if you're ripping on Android
<a href="http://itunes.com/Apps/BrokeAndroid" title="itunes.com" rel="nofollow">http://itunes.com/Apps/BrokeAndroid</a> [itunes.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's called BrokeAndroid .
It lets you smash up an android phone on your iPhone .
I guess it 's ok if you 're ripping on Android http : //itunes.com/Apps/BrokeAndroid [ itunes.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's called BrokeAndroid.
It lets you smash up an android phone on your iPhone.
I guess it's ok if you're ripping on Android
http://itunes.com/Apps/BrokeAndroid [itunes.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31043722</id>
	<title>Re:Android</title>
	<author>w0mprat</author>
	<datestamp>1265397600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's an operating system for that.</p></div><p>There, fixed that for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's an operating system for that.There , fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's an operating system for that.There, fixed that for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036760</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265395980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's some pretty harsh punishment for buggy software.  LOL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's some pretty harsh punishment for buggy software .
LOL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's some pretty harsh punishment for buggy software.
LOL</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039688</id>
	<title>Re:No, but...</title>
	<author>itsdapead</author>
	<datestamp>1265365800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No, but then Barnes and Noble isn't the only place you can sell your book. If you don't like their policies, you can also put it up for sale on Amazon, Books-A-Million, any number of local bookstores, and probably even stores like Wal-Mart, Target, etc.</p></div><p>...because major bookstore chains and stores like Walmart are <i>so very well known</i> for being friendly and accommodating to small, independent book producers and self-publishing writers, and don't favor the big publishers or cherry pick a few best-selling authors <i>at all</i>. In fact, you'd be lucky to get in the door unless you're signed up with a major publisher and distributor: good luck getting your rights back if you don't like the way they are distributing your book.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Imagine if you bought, for example, an HP laptop, and they told you the following: "Congratulations on your new HP laptop! To obtain applications, visit apps.hp.com.</p></div><p>Trouble is, if apps.hp.com offered thousands of apps, with some minimum level of quality control and assurance that they'll run on your hardware, a reduced danger that you'll get clobbered with virii malware or see your machine clogged up with pointless startup services - then a hell of a lot of <i>customers</i> would feel it was a great improvement on the status quo.

</p><p>The question is, would HP let you register as a developer for pocket money? (How much does it cost to register as an XBox or PS3 developer?)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , but then Barnes and Noble is n't the only place you can sell your book .
If you do n't like their policies , you can also put it up for sale on Amazon , Books-A-Million , any number of local bookstores , and probably even stores like Wal-Mart , Target , etc....because major bookstore chains and stores like Walmart are so very well known for being friendly and accommodating to small , independent book producers and self-publishing writers , and do n't favor the big publishers or cherry pick a few best-selling authors at all .
In fact , you 'd be lucky to get in the door unless you 're signed up with a major publisher and distributor : good luck getting your rights back if you do n't like the way they are distributing your book.Imagine if you bought , for example , an HP laptop , and they told you the following : " Congratulations on your new HP laptop !
To obtain applications , visit apps.hp.com.Trouble is , if apps.hp.com offered thousands of apps , with some minimum level of quality control and assurance that they 'll run on your hardware , a reduced danger that you 'll get clobbered with virii malware or see your machine clogged up with pointless startup services - then a hell of a lot of customers would feel it was a great improvement on the status quo .
The question is , would HP let you register as a developer for pocket money ?
( How much does it cost to register as an XBox or PS3 developer ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, but then Barnes and Noble isn't the only place you can sell your book.
If you don't like their policies, you can also put it up for sale on Amazon, Books-A-Million, any number of local bookstores, and probably even stores like Wal-Mart, Target, etc....because major bookstore chains and stores like Walmart are so very well known for being friendly and accommodating to small, independent book producers and self-publishing writers, and don't favor the big publishers or cherry pick a few best-selling authors at all.
In fact, you'd be lucky to get in the door unless you're signed up with a major publisher and distributor: good luck getting your rights back if you don't like the way they are distributing your book.Imagine if you bought, for example, an HP laptop, and they told you the following: "Congratulations on your new HP laptop!
To obtain applications, visit apps.hp.com.Trouble is, if apps.hp.com offered thousands of apps, with some minimum level of quality control and assurance that they'll run on your hardware, a reduced danger that you'll get clobbered with virii malware or see your machine clogged up with pointless startup services - then a hell of a lot of customers would feel it was a great improvement on the status quo.
The question is, would HP let you register as a developer for pocket money?
(How much does it cost to register as an XBox or PS3 developer?
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037268</id>
	<title>Re:Was it your flash of stupidity you meant?</title>
	<author>vijayiyer</author>
	<datestamp>1265398200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The rub is that The New York Times and Oprah Book Club don't sell books.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The rub is that The New York Times and Oprah Book Club do n't sell books .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The rub is that The New York Times and Oprah Book Club don't sell books.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037152</id>
	<title>Sarcasm?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265397780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFA: "I suppose it&rsquo;s logical, and I&rsquo;m not complaining; Apple is a wonderful company to work with."</p><p>Is this sarcasm? I honestly couldn't tell.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : " I suppose it    s logical , and I    m not complaining ; Apple is a wonderful company to work with .
" Is this sarcasm ?
I honestly could n't tell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA: "I suppose it’s logical, and I’m not complaining; Apple is a wonderful company to work with.
"Is this sarcasm?
I honestly couldn't tell.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036476</id>
	<title>Re:David or Goliath, Which One Today?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265394720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...Apple's desire to have <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1899" title="apple.com" rel="nofollow">Windows applications running on OSX</a> [apple.com]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>slightly wrong<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Boot Camp allows Windows OS to run on Mac Intel hardware, separate from OSX. i.e. Multi Boot</p><p>But you can use 3rd party OSX software Parallels and VMWare Fusion though to do what you initially described, which is Windows and Windows apps running on top of OSX.</p><p>Class dismissed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Apple 's desire to have Windows applications running on OSX [ apple.com ] ...slightly wrong ... Boot Camp allows Windows OS to run on Mac Intel hardware , separate from OSX .
i.e. Multi BootBut you can use 3rd party OSX software Parallels and VMWare Fusion though to do what you initially described , which is Windows and Windows apps running on top of OSX.Class dismissed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...Apple's desire to have Windows applications running on OSX [apple.com] ...slightly wrong ... Boot Camp allows Windows OS to run on Mac Intel hardware, separate from OSX.
i.e. Multi BootBut you can use 3rd party OSX software Parallels and VMWare Fusion though to do what you initially described, which is Windows and Windows apps running on top of OSX.Class dismissed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31044630</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1265458440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Next time someone complains about Windows, I'll be sure to claim that "most people don't want to do it that way", and only a "few nerds" are going to use that. After all, if we're equating market share with desired specific features, it works for all companies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Next time someone complains about Windows , I 'll be sure to claim that " most people do n't want to do it that way " , and only a " few nerds " are going to use that .
After all , if we 're equating market share with desired specific features , it works for all companies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next time someone complains about Windows, I'll be sure to claim that "most people don't want to do it that way", and only a "few nerds" are going to use that.
After all, if we're equating market share with desired specific features, it works for all companies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31044860</id>
	<title>Re:When is this ever false?</title>
	<author>nugneant</author>
	<datestamp>1265462220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What euphemism would you rather people use, milady? <br> <br>

(Remember the time when people didn't automatically assume they were qualified to speculate as to others' motivations, and found better things to do than bicker over semantics?)</htmltext>
<tokenext>What euphemism would you rather people use , milady ?
( Remember the time when people did n't automatically assume they were qualified to speculate as to others ' motivations , and found better things to do than bicker over semantics ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What euphemism would you rather people use, milady?
(Remember the time when people didn't automatically assume they were qualified to speculate as to others' motivations, and found better things to do than bicker over semantics?
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037640</id>
	<title>Re:When is this ever false?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265400120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No let me know when Apple is censoring speech, and we will tlak.</p><p>Guess what? If I ran coffee shop and you came in and started yelling, I'd toss you out. That wouldn't be wrong at all. I also wouldn't serve  a product called "You can get a 2.99 breakfast and Denny's" I guess  would be forging the chains of censorship for choosing which products I want to sell.</p><p>This is a Decision by Apple for there product sales. IT's a bad one, will reflect poorly, and it shows they haven't been paying attention to most of the complaints about the iPad. But it isn't a link in a chain that mean none of us will be able to speak are opinions.</p><p>Or it was one person with a hair up there but abusing their power to deny apps. I think we have all seen that sort of thing happen before.</p><p>For those playing the home game ""Judge Aaron Sati" is a fictional character from Star Trek and the context of the quote is completely out of place.</p><p>Of all the actual relevant quotes that exist, the fact you choose a fictional one is really sad.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No let me know when Apple is censoring speech , and we will tlak.Guess what ?
If I ran coffee shop and you came in and started yelling , I 'd toss you out .
That would n't be wrong at all .
I also would n't serve a product called " You can get a 2.99 breakfast and Denny 's " I guess would be forging the chains of censorship for choosing which products I want to sell.This is a Decision by Apple for there product sales .
IT 's a bad one , will reflect poorly , and it shows they have n't been paying attention to most of the complaints about the iPad .
But it is n't a link in a chain that mean none of us will be able to speak are opinions.Or it was one person with a hair up there but abusing their power to deny apps .
I think we have all seen that sort of thing happen before.For those playing the home game " " Judge Aaron Sati " is a fictional character from Star Trek and the context of the quote is completely out of place.Of all the actual relevant quotes that exist , the fact you choose a fictional one is really sad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No let me know when Apple is censoring speech, and we will tlak.Guess what?
If I ran coffee shop and you came in and started yelling, I'd toss you out.
That wouldn't be wrong at all.
I also wouldn't serve  a product called "You can get a 2.99 breakfast and Denny's" I guess  would be forging the chains of censorship for choosing which products I want to sell.This is a Decision by Apple for there product sales.
IT's a bad one, will reflect poorly, and it shows they haven't been paying attention to most of the complaints about the iPad.
But it isn't a link in a chain that mean none of us will be able to speak are opinions.Or it was one person with a hair up there but abusing their power to deny apps.
I think we have all seen that sort of thing happen before.For those playing the home game ""Judge Aaron Sati" is a fictional character from Star Trek and the context of the quote is completely out of place.Of all the actual relevant quotes that exist, the fact you choose a fictional one is really sad.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037494</id>
	<title>Re:Flash of stupidity...</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1265399220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Does anybody think Barnes and Noble would be willing to post a sign saying your book was #38 in its category on Amazon"</p><p>Ironically, I've seen similiar signs in many BANs.</p><p>Also, it isn't uncommon for a retail outlet to let you know where else to buy a product. It's called 'customer service'</p><p>Hell you can even learn how to compete with BaN at BaN:</p><p><a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Home-Based-Bookstore/Steve-Weber/e/9780977240609/?itm=1&amp;USRI=amazon" title="barnesandnoble.com">http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Home-Based-Bookstore/Steve-Weber/e/9780977240609/?itm=1&amp;USRI=amazon</a> [barnesandnoble.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Does anybody think Barnes and Noble would be willing to post a sign saying your book was # 38 in its category on Amazon " Ironically , I 've seen similiar signs in many BANs.Also , it is n't uncommon for a retail outlet to let you know where else to buy a product .
It 's called 'customer service'Hell you can even learn how to compete with BaN at BaN : http : //search.barnesandnoble.com/Home-Based-Bookstore/Steve-Weber/e/9780977240609/ ? itm = 1&amp;USRI = amazon [ barnesandnoble.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Does anybody think Barnes and Noble would be willing to post a sign saying your book was #38 in its category on Amazon"Ironically, I've seen similiar signs in many BANs.Also, it isn't uncommon for a retail outlet to let you know where else to buy a product.
It's called 'customer service'Hell you can even learn how to compete with BaN at BaN:http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Home-Based-Bookstore/Steve-Weber/e/9780977240609/?itm=1&amp;USRI=amazon [barnesandnoble.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31042750</id>
	<title>Re:Appstore model is broken</title>
	<author>Mr2001</author>
	<datestamp>1265386140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Purely as a user, what's not to like?</p></div><p>How about the fact that because of the restrictions Apple places on developers, you either can't get some of the popular apps that are available on other smartphones, or can only get less-functional versions?</p><p>"You want to listen to personalized music streams while you're checking your email? Sorry, there's no app for that. You want to automatically set the ringer to silent when you get within 100 feet of your office? Sorry, no app for that either. Can I interest you in fart sounds instead?"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Purely as a user , what 's not to like ? How about the fact that because of the restrictions Apple places on developers , you either ca n't get some of the popular apps that are available on other smartphones , or can only get less-functional versions ?
" You want to listen to personalized music streams while you 're checking your email ?
Sorry , there 's no app for that .
You want to automatically set the ringer to silent when you get within 100 feet of your office ?
Sorry , no app for that either .
Can I interest you in fart sounds instead ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Purely as a user, what's not to like?How about the fact that because of the restrictions Apple places on developers, you either can't get some of the popular apps that are available on other smartphones, or can only get less-functional versions?
"You want to listen to personalized music streams while you're checking your email?
Sorry, there's no app for that.
You want to automatically set the ringer to silent when you get within 100 feet of your office?
Sorry, no app for that either.
Can I interest you in fart sounds instead?
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037942</id>
	<title>Re:Appstore model is broken</title>
	<author>DragonWriter</author>
	<datestamp>1265401380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The apps are tested to ensure they follow basic UI guidelines and that they fail gracefully when connectivity is limited or unavailable. Purely as a user, what's not to like?</p></div></blockquote><p>The way Apple demands that popular applications be "updated" to <i>remove</i> basic functionality (e.g., most recently, USB-based transfers for GoodReader and Stanza.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The apps are tested to ensure they follow basic UI guidelines and that they fail gracefully when connectivity is limited or unavailable .
Purely as a user , what 's not to like ? The way Apple demands that popular applications be " updated " to remove basic functionality ( e.g. , most recently , USB-based transfers for GoodReader and Stanza .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The apps are tested to ensure they follow basic UI guidelines and that they fail gracefully when connectivity is limited or unavailable.
Purely as a user, what's not to like?The way Apple demands that popular applications be "updated" to remove basic functionality (e.g., most recently, USB-based transfers for GoodReader and Stanza.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036186</id>
	<title>Re:Makes Sense</title>
	<author>SquirrelCrack</author>
	<datestamp>1265393580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>While I'm sure many will eagerly jump forward to proclaim, yet again, how evil Apple has become, to me, this just makes sense. Mentioning that the app was a finalist in Google's Android Developer's Challenge implies that the app is compatible with an Android system. Even if one moron downloads it thinking that it will work on their Andriod phone, it's one person too many. Makes sense to me.</p></div><p>Really Mods?!   Who was he trolling? morons?  To top it off, he actually has a valid point.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>While I 'm sure many will eagerly jump forward to proclaim , yet again , how evil Apple has become , to me , this just makes sense .
Mentioning that the app was a finalist in Google 's Android Developer 's Challenge implies that the app is compatible with an Android system .
Even if one moron downloads it thinking that it will work on their Andriod phone , it 's one person too many .
Makes sense to me.Really Mods ? !
Who was he trolling ?
morons ? To top it off , he actually has a valid point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I'm sure many will eagerly jump forward to proclaim, yet again, how evil Apple has become, to me, this just makes sense.
Mentioning that the app was a finalist in Google's Android Developer's Challenge implies that the app is compatible with an Android system.
Even if one moron downloads it thinking that it will work on their Andriod phone, it's one person too many.
Makes sense to me.Really Mods?!
Who was he trolling?
morons?  To top it off, he actually has a valid point.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039046</id>
	<title>Re:Flash of stupidity...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265362860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes and Yes.</p><p>If I'm at B&amp;N I'm there to buy.  If an Amazon buyer is in B&amp;N, they are not going to buy from B&amp;N, they are there browsing to fill out their Amazon whish list.  If anything, that Amazon endorsement is more likely to encourage impulse buying.  Best Buy would absolutely advertise the fact that their music is not censored in order to differentiate themselves.</p><p>The phrase in question was not an endorsement for Android, it was an endorsement for the app.  You can't be complacent towards a store trying to cover up the fact that they have competitors.  You can't seriously think that people will be browsing the iPhone app store, see that the app they want is also available for Android, and then decide to toss their $500 phone in favor of a new Android driven phone, new cell phone contract, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes and Yes.If I 'm at B&amp;N I 'm there to buy .
If an Amazon buyer is in B&amp;N , they are not going to buy from B&amp;N , they are there browsing to fill out their Amazon whish list .
If anything , that Amazon endorsement is more likely to encourage impulse buying .
Best Buy would absolutely advertise the fact that their music is not censored in order to differentiate themselves.The phrase in question was not an endorsement for Android , it was an endorsement for the app .
You ca n't be complacent towards a store trying to cover up the fact that they have competitors .
You ca n't seriously think that people will be browsing the iPhone app store , see that the app they want is also available for Android , and then decide to toss their $ 500 phone in favor of a new Android driven phone , new cell phone contract , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes and Yes.If I'm at B&amp;N I'm there to buy.
If an Amazon buyer is in B&amp;N, they are not going to buy from B&amp;N, they are there browsing to fill out their Amazon whish list.
If anything, that Amazon endorsement is more likely to encourage impulse buying.
Best Buy would absolutely advertise the fact that their music is not censored in order to differentiate themselves.The phrase in question was not an endorsement for Android, it was an endorsement for the app.
You can't be complacent towards a store trying to cover up the fact that they have competitors.
You can't seriously think that people will be browsing the iPhone app store, see that the app they want is also available for Android, and then decide to toss their $500 phone in favor of a new Android driven phone, new cell phone contract, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039124</id>
	<title>Apple joining the Borg</title>
	<author>ecorona</author>
	<datestamp>1265363220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now, don't get me wrong because I love that Windows has some competition. Still, I can't shake the feeling that we look the other way too much when Apple does some evil authoritarian tactic to boost its sells. I for one, will vote with my wallet in the future and avoid the iPhone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now , do n't get me wrong because I love that Windows has some competition .
Still , I ca n't shake the feeling that we look the other way too much when Apple does some evil authoritarian tactic to boost its sells .
I for one , will vote with my wallet in the future and avoid the iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now, don't get me wrong because I love that Windows has some competition.
Still, I can't shake the feeling that we look the other way too much when Apple does some evil authoritarian tactic to boost its sells.
I for one, will vote with my wallet in the future and avoid the iPhone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035948</id>
	<title>Uuuuh wrong?</title>
	<author>RyuuzakiTetsuya</author>
	<datestamp>1265392620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think everyone's going to dogpile on Apple for this, but I think they're missing the point, the point of the removal isn't the word Android, or Google, but the whole phrase of Google Android Developer Contest.  They want to be disassociated with that contest.  Given that Apple hasn't delisted apps that claim compatibility with other phones, and they even list a whole crap load of Android podcasts and other Android content in the iTunes store, I don't think Apple's paranoid about just the Apple or Google part.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think everyone 's going to dogpile on Apple for this , but I think they 're missing the point , the point of the removal is n't the word Android , or Google , but the whole phrase of Google Android Developer Contest .
They want to be disassociated with that contest .
Given that Apple has n't delisted apps that claim compatibility with other phones , and they even list a whole crap load of Android podcasts and other Android content in the iTunes store , I do n't think Apple 's paranoid about just the Apple or Google part .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think everyone's going to dogpile on Apple for this, but I think they're missing the point, the point of the removal isn't the word Android, or Google, but the whole phrase of Google Android Developer Contest.
They want to be disassociated with that contest.
Given that Apple hasn't delisted apps that claim compatibility with other phones, and they even list a whole crap load of Android podcasts and other Android content in the iTunes store, I don't think Apple's paranoid about just the Apple or Google part.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036732</id>
	<title>Mod parent up</title>
	<author>Comboman</author>
	<datestamp>1265395800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Last time I checked, Android apps couldn't run on an iPhone (and vise-versa).  The Android version of the app may have won a prize but that doesn't apply to the iPhone version.  Ask anyone who has ever played the "same" game on XBox360, PS3, Wii and PC; just because they have the same name, doesn't make them the same app.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Last time I checked , Android apps could n't run on an iPhone ( and vise-versa ) .
The Android version of the app may have won a prize but that does n't apply to the iPhone version .
Ask anyone who has ever played the " same " game on XBox360 , PS3 , Wii and PC ; just because they have the same name , does n't make them the same app .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last time I checked, Android apps couldn't run on an iPhone (and vise-versa).
The Android version of the app may have won a prize but that doesn't apply to the iPhone version.
Ask anyone who has ever played the "same" game on XBox360, PS3, Wii and PC; just because they have the same name, doesn't make them the same app.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039802</id>
	<title>Re:No, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265366280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're moving the goal posts.</p><p>The original developer seems perfectly okay with developing two different versions of the same application for two different platforms.  Nobody is saying he can't do that.  Apple is just saying don't write a description that is confusing or of no benefit to an iPhone user.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're moving the goal posts.The original developer seems perfectly okay with developing two different versions of the same application for two different platforms .
Nobody is saying he ca n't do that .
Apple is just saying do n't write a description that is confusing or of no benefit to an iPhone user .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're moving the goal posts.The original developer seems perfectly okay with developing two different versions of the same application for two different platforms.
Nobody is saying he can't do that.
Apple is just saying don't write a description that is confusing or of no benefit to an iPhone user.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037614</id>
	<title>This just in...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265400000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple is communism. They get to dictate what the hardware you purchase can do, and they can push any kind of BS restrictions they like. For this reason, smart people don't buy Apple products.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple is communism .
They get to dictate what the hardware you purchase can do , and they can push any kind of BS restrictions they like .
For this reason , smart people do n't buy Apple products .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple is communism.
They get to dictate what the hardware you purchase can do, and they can push any kind of BS restrictions they like.
For this reason, smart people don't buy Apple products.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036228</id>
	<title>And don't mention the war!</title>
	<author>andrut</author>
	<datestamp>1265393760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I mentioned it once, but I think I got away with it all right. [returns to the Germans] So! It's all forgotten now, and let's hear no more about it. So, that's two egg mayonnaise, a prawn Goebbels, a Hermann Goering, and four Colditz salads.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mentioned it once , but I think I got away with it all right .
[ returns to the Germans ] So !
It 's all forgotten now , and let 's hear no more about it .
So , that 's two egg mayonnaise , a prawn Goebbels , a Hermann Goering , and four Colditz salads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mentioned it once, but I think I got away with it all right.
[returns to the Germans] So!
It's all forgotten now, and let's hear no more about it.
So, that's two egg mayonnaise, a prawn Goebbels, a Hermann Goering, and four Colditz salads.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040464</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>Jesus\_666</author>
	<datestamp>1265369220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It'll continue with the users. Those, such as yourself, who buy Apple products expecting a useful product will become dismayed, never buy another Apple product, and will suggest to other people that they also avoid Apple.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Except for those Apple users who have actually ever used an Apple product and will probably keep doing so because most Apple products are actually fairly good. As are most Microsoft products, for the record, even if I dislike them.<br>
<br>
Yes, my iPod touch doesn't multitask. Doesn't mean it's not still a decent MP3 player with a PDA built in, which I got for a extremely good price (35 EUR through the Back to School rebate offer); multitasking would occasionally be nice but I don't miss it enough to care. Yes, it needs iTunes, which apprently sucks big time on Windows. This doesn't faze me either as iTunes is a pretty good program on Mac OS and I use it anyway.<br>
<br>
Yes, Macs are expensive. Until you require a certain feature set (like anything involving FireWire 800) that puts Mac prices on equal footing with those of comparable devices. That might even happen if you're shopping for a decent notebook; the Apple tax is above zero mainly for desktop systems.<br>
<br>
It's easy to find things to hate about the company but it's not like they consistently produce useless junk that people pay pay at 500\% market value for no reason at all. Most consumers do use their brain when making purchases and they have (often valid) reasons for their decision. Yes, even those who buy products you personally dislike.</p><blockquote><div><p>Hell, I was in the mall last week and overheard a group of teens making fun of Apple products as being for "queerfags".</p></div></blockquote><p>Just like Modern Warfare 2, every video game but Modern Warfare 2, Win7, every OS but Win7, rap, every music genre but rap (and especially metal), metal, every music genre but metal (and especially rap), motorcycles, everything but motorcycles... If we assume the failure of everything some teenager has described as "for fags" we are looking at the end of human culture within the next twenty years.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 'll continue with the users .
Those , such as yourself , who buy Apple products expecting a useful product will become dismayed , never buy another Apple product , and will suggest to other people that they also avoid Apple .
Except for those Apple users who have actually ever used an Apple product and will probably keep doing so because most Apple products are actually fairly good .
As are most Microsoft products , for the record , even if I dislike them .
Yes , my iPod touch does n't multitask .
Does n't mean it 's not still a decent MP3 player with a PDA built in , which I got for a extremely good price ( 35 EUR through the Back to School rebate offer ) ; multitasking would occasionally be nice but I do n't miss it enough to care .
Yes , it needs iTunes , which apprently sucks big time on Windows .
This does n't faze me either as iTunes is a pretty good program on Mac OS and I use it anyway .
Yes , Macs are expensive .
Until you require a certain feature set ( like anything involving FireWire 800 ) that puts Mac prices on equal footing with those of comparable devices .
That might even happen if you 're shopping for a decent notebook ; the Apple tax is above zero mainly for desktop systems .
It 's easy to find things to hate about the company but it 's not like they consistently produce useless junk that people pay pay at 500 \ % market value for no reason at all .
Most consumers do use their brain when making purchases and they have ( often valid ) reasons for their decision .
Yes , even those who buy products you personally dislike.Hell , I was in the mall last week and overheard a group of teens making fun of Apple products as being for " queerfags " .Just like Modern Warfare 2 , every video game but Modern Warfare 2 , Win7 , every OS but Win7 , rap , every music genre but rap ( and especially metal ) , metal , every music genre but metal ( and especially rap ) , motorcycles , everything but motorcycles... If we assume the failure of everything some teenager has described as " for fags " we are looking at the end of human culture within the next twenty years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It'll continue with the users.
Those, such as yourself, who buy Apple products expecting a useful product will become dismayed, never buy another Apple product, and will suggest to other people that they also avoid Apple.
Except for those Apple users who have actually ever used an Apple product and will probably keep doing so because most Apple products are actually fairly good.
As are most Microsoft products, for the record, even if I dislike them.
Yes, my iPod touch doesn't multitask.
Doesn't mean it's not still a decent MP3 player with a PDA built in, which I got for a extremely good price (35 EUR through the Back to School rebate offer); multitasking would occasionally be nice but I don't miss it enough to care.
Yes, it needs iTunes, which apprently sucks big time on Windows.
This doesn't faze me either as iTunes is a pretty good program on Mac OS and I use it anyway.
Yes, Macs are expensive.
Until you require a certain feature set (like anything involving FireWire 800) that puts Mac prices on equal footing with those of comparable devices.
That might even happen if you're shopping for a decent notebook; the Apple tax is above zero mainly for desktop systems.
It's easy to find things to hate about the company but it's not like they consistently produce useless junk that people pay pay at 500\% market value for no reason at all.
Most consumers do use their brain when making purchases and they have (often valid) reasons for their decision.
Yes, even those who buy products you personally dislike.Hell, I was in the mall last week and overheard a group of teens making fun of Apple products as being for "queerfags".Just like Modern Warfare 2, every video game but Modern Warfare 2, Win7, every OS but Win7, rap, every music genre but rap (and especially metal), metal, every music genre but metal (and especially rap), motorcycles, everything but motorcycles... If we assume the failure of everything some teenager has described as "for fags" we are looking at the end of human culture within the next twenty years.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035888</id>
	<title>Re:Flash of stupidity...</title>
	<author>MikeBabcock</author>
	<datestamp>1265392380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lots of books have their review list, etc. shown on the back.  Do you think the Washington Post wouldn't review a book that has "#4 NYT Best Seller" on the cover?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lots of books have their review list , etc .
shown on the back .
Do you think the Washington Post would n't review a book that has " # 4 NYT Best Seller " on the cover ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lots of books have their review list, etc.
shown on the back.
Do you think the Washington Post wouldn't review a book that has "#4 NYT Best Seller" on the cover?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036684</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>ArhcAngel</author>
	<datestamp>1265395620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WOW, insightful comments from AC. Who knew?</p><p>I second this. The only reason I even fire up iTunes is to install updates. Although obvious a <a href="http://www.mediamonkey.com/" title="mediamonkey.com">link</a> [mediamonkey.com] is always nice. It's periphery functions are also quite interesting. The ability to quickly search multiple locations (CDDB, Amazon, Amazon UK, etc) to fill in missing information works really well and the DJ mode for using during parties to keep wandering hands from snarking up your settings is a nice touch. It allows plug-ins and there is a healthy community of 3rd party plug-ins available.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WOW , insightful comments from AC .
Who knew ? I second this .
The only reason I even fire up iTunes is to install updates .
Although obvious a link [ mediamonkey.com ] is always nice .
It 's periphery functions are also quite interesting .
The ability to quickly search multiple locations ( CDDB , Amazon , Amazon UK , etc ) to fill in missing information works really well and the DJ mode for using during parties to keep wandering hands from snarking up your settings is a nice touch .
It allows plug-ins and there is a healthy community of 3rd party plug-ins available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WOW, insightful comments from AC.
Who knew?I second this.
The only reason I even fire up iTunes is to install updates.
Although obvious a link [mediamonkey.com] is always nice.
It's periphery functions are also quite interesting.
The ability to quickly search multiple locations (CDDB, Amazon, Amazon UK, etc) to fill in missing information works really well and the DJ mode for using during parties to keep wandering hands from snarking up your settings is a nice touch.
It allows plug-ins and there is a healthy community of 3rd party plug-ins available.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035952</id>
	<title>Appstore model is broken</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265392620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's getting clearer and clearer that the appstore model is quite broken.</p><p>While I can see why Apple would want to keep it like that (they make loads of money off of it), a far better (for the consumer and community) model would be a packaging system &#225; la apt/yum with added hooks for payment for commercial apps. That way you could add your app to any repo that would accept it, or start your own repo.</p><p>There are a few security considerations to this approach, but I'm sure they could be worked out.</p><p>I sincerely hope Android/Google can move in this direction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's getting clearer and clearer that the appstore model is quite broken.While I can see why Apple would want to keep it like that ( they make loads of money off of it ) , a far better ( for the consumer and community ) model would be a packaging system   la apt/yum with added hooks for payment for commercial apps .
That way you could add your app to any repo that would accept it , or start your own repo.There are a few security considerations to this approach , but I 'm sure they could be worked out.I sincerely hope Android/Google can move in this direction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's getting clearer and clearer that the appstore model is quite broken.While I can see why Apple would want to keep it like that (they make loads of money off of it), a far better (for the consumer and community) model would be a packaging system á la apt/yum with added hooks for payment for commercial apps.
That way you could add your app to any repo that would accept it, or start your own repo.There are a few security considerations to this approach, but I'm sure they could be worked out.I sincerely hope Android/Google can move in this direction.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036052</id>
	<title>Re:Remember a time..</title>
	<author>Shatrat</author>
	<datestamp>1265392920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not really illegal until you've actually eliminated or prevented competition through it.<br>
As it is hopefully the backlash from their North Korea style platform management should be enough to handle it.<br>
I know I certainly wouldn't have an iPhone at any price.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not really illegal until you 've actually eliminated or prevented competition through it .
As it is hopefully the backlash from their North Korea style platform management should be enough to handle it .
I know I certainly would n't have an iPhone at any price .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not really illegal until you've actually eliminated or prevented competition through it.
As it is hopefully the backlash from their North Korea style platform management should be enough to handle it.
I know I certainly wouldn't have an iPhone at any price.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036458</id>
	<title>Re:Remember a time..</title>
	<author>zlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1265394660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IPhone's app market definetly has a larger marketshare than Android. They're using this to silence developers mentioning other platforms, basically that's like Microsoft telling an app vendor that their app will be erased from all Windows users' PCs if the app's packaging contains a "compatible with Mac" logo. And a "best Mac app of the year" award.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IPhone 's app market definetly has a larger marketshare than Android .
They 're using this to silence developers mentioning other platforms , basically that 's like Microsoft telling an app vendor that their app will be erased from all Windows users ' PCs if the app 's packaging contains a " compatible with Mac " logo .
And a " best Mac app of the year " award .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IPhone's app market definetly has a larger marketshare than Android.
They're using this to silence developers mentioning other platforms, basically that's like Microsoft telling an app vendor that their app will be erased from all Windows users' PCs if the app's packaging contains a "compatible with Mac" logo.
And a "best Mac app of the year" award.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038478</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>c</author>
	<datestamp>1265403540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; To say that I hate it with the intensity of a<br>&gt; thousand burning stars would be an \_understatement\_.</p><p>I met a guy who hated iTunes so much that he bought a Zune instead of an iPod. Now, that's hate.</p><p>c.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; To say that I hate it with the intensity of a &gt; thousand burning stars would be an \ _understatement \ _.I met a guy who hated iTunes so much that he bought a Zune instead of an iPod .
Now , that 's hate.c .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; To say that I hate it with the intensity of a&gt; thousand burning stars would be an \_understatement\_.I met a guy who hated iTunes so much that he bought a Zune instead of an iPod.
Now, that's hate.c.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037168</id>
	<title>re:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265397840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Must be awesome to get to work at a company with all the character of an insecure 4th grader.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Must be awesome to get to work at a company with all the character of an insecure 4th grader .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Must be awesome to get to work at a company with all the character of an insecure 4th grader.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040720</id>
	<title>Re:Uuuuh wrong?</title>
	<author>hkmwbz</author>
	<datestamp>1265370840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, it seems to be about irrelevant information. Android just happens to be irrelevant to the iPhone App Store.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , it seems to be about irrelevant information .
Android just happens to be irrelevant to the iPhone App Store .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, it seems to be about irrelevant information.
Android just happens to be irrelevant to the iPhone App Store.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036546</id>
	<title>Re:Uuuuh wrong?</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1265395020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>the point of the removal isn't the word Android, or Google, but the whole phrase of Google Android Developer Contest.</p></div><p>That's not what Apple's response says at all:</p><p><i>we found that your application contains inappropriate or irrelevant <b>platform information</b> in the Application Description and/or Release Notes sections<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Providing future <b>platform compatibility</b> plans or other <b>general platform references</b> are not relevant in the context of the iPhone App Store.</i></p><p>So, yes, this is about Android as a whole, not just the contest.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the point of the removal is n't the word Android , or Google , but the whole phrase of Google Android Developer Contest.That 's not what Apple 's response says at all : we found that your application contains inappropriate or irrelevant platform information in the Application Description and/or Release Notes sections ... Providing future platform compatibility plans or other general platform references are not relevant in the context of the iPhone App Store.So , yes , this is about Android as a whole , not just the contest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the point of the removal isn't the word Android, or Google, but the whole phrase of Google Android Developer Contest.That's not what Apple's response says at all:we found that your application contains inappropriate or irrelevant platform information in the Application Description and/or Release Notes sections ... Providing future platform compatibility plans or other general platform references are not relevant in the context of the iPhone App Store.So, yes, this is about Android as a whole, not just the contest.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035948</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31045406</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1265470500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually I'd say that much of Apple's support is among geeks - with the exception of the mp3 player market, most people don't use Apple products, and it's just places like Slashdot where they are loved as the Best Ever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually I 'd say that much of Apple 's support is among geeks - with the exception of the mp3 player market , most people do n't use Apple products , and it 's just places like Slashdot where they are loved as the Best Ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually I'd say that much of Apple's support is among geeks - with the exception of the mp3 player market, most people don't use Apple products, and it's just places like Slashdot where they are loved as the Best Ever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036532</id>
	<title>Attention</title>
	<author>lluBdeR</author>
	<datestamp>1265394960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Android is now an un-word</htmltext>
<tokenext>Android is now an un-word</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Android is now an un-word</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036348</id>
	<title>Just reword it to</title>
	<author>cstdenis</author>
	<datestamp>1265394300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Winner of the Google developer challenge for (competing app Apple forbids the name of)"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Winner of the Google developer challenge for ( competing app Apple forbids the name of ) "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Winner of the Google developer challenge for (competing app Apple forbids the name of)"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040130</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>stewbacca</author>
	<datestamp>1265367720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Neckbeards...nice!  Hey, if a guy can post a stupid thing about Starbucks, John Mayer and Apple to start this thread off, then I say neckbeards and slashtards are legit.</p><p>On a serious note, I've been watching slashdot for a couple of years now and have never (even though I try) been able to understand the "drm-whining neckbeards" and their free-tard mentality--and I have a pretty open mind--and I work at a software company.  I've decided to finally chalk them up with the Ron Paul retards...they have their passion, but I'll never understand why they are so interested in shooting down mine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Neckbeards...nice !
Hey , if a guy can post a stupid thing about Starbucks , John Mayer and Apple to start this thread off , then I say neckbeards and slashtards are legit.On a serious note , I 've been watching slashdot for a couple of years now and have never ( even though I try ) been able to understand the " drm-whining neckbeards " and their free-tard mentality--and I have a pretty open mind--and I work at a software company .
I 've decided to finally chalk them up with the Ron Paul retards...they have their passion , but I 'll never understand why they are so interested in shooting down mine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Neckbeards...nice!
Hey, if a guy can post a stupid thing about Starbucks, John Mayer and Apple to start this thread off, then I say neckbeards and slashtards are legit.On a serious note, I've been watching slashdot for a couple of years now and have never (even though I try) been able to understand the "drm-whining neckbeards" and their free-tard mentality--and I have a pretty open mind--and I work at a software company.
I've decided to finally chalk them up with the Ron Paul retards...they have their passion, but I'll never understand why they are so interested in shooting down mine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036632</id>
	<title>Re:Remember a time..</title>
	<author>neoform</author>
	<datestamp>1265395380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No one is forcing this guy to develop for the iPhone. He does develop for the iPhone, because iPhone apps make way more money than android apps.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No one is forcing this guy to develop for the iPhone .
He does develop for the iPhone , because iPhone apps make way more money than android apps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No one is forcing this guy to develop for the iPhone.
He does develop for the iPhone, because iPhone apps make way more money than android apps.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036252</id>
	<title>Re:When is this ever false?</title>
	<author>trickyD1ck</author>
	<datestamp>1265393880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A company wants to have competitive advantage and make profit. News at eleven. The only censor we should be concerned of is the government.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A company wants to have competitive advantage and make profit .
News at eleven .
The only censor we should be concerned of is the government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A company wants to have competitive advantage and make profit.
News at eleven.
The only censor we should be concerned of is the government.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036978</id>
	<title>Re:The wording of Apple's reply</title>
	<author>tftp</author>
	<datestamp>1265397000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>would you have preferred them to have rejected the app outright instead?</i>
</p><p>
An outright, written rejection on the grounds of mentioning the competition may be seen by lawyers as grounds for a lawsuit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>would you have preferred them to have rejected the app outright instead ?
An outright , written rejection on the grounds of mentioning the competition may be seen by lawyers as grounds for a lawsuit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> would you have preferred them to have rejected the app outright instead?
An outright, written rejection on the grounds of mentioning the competition may be seen by lawyers as grounds for a lawsuit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039942</id>
	<title>Apple. Think Different...</title>
	<author>Snufu</author>
	<datestamp>1265366940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Think Evil.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Think Evil .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think Evil.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036288</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265394000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It used to be A LOT slower than it is today. I wouldn't say it's that bad in its current state. But other products seem so much better than iTunes--it really sucks we are forced to use it</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It used to be A LOT slower than it is today .
I would n't say it 's that bad in its current state .
But other products seem so much better than iTunes--it really sucks we are forced to use it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It used to be A LOT slower than it is today.
I wouldn't say it's that bad in its current state.
But other products seem so much better than iTunes--it really sucks we are forced to use it</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036010</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265392800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And what kills me is that all of the iPhone limitations are caused by Apple being shitty company.  Seriously, Apple, why the fuck can't I sync my iPod Touch on Linux?  It's not that nobody is willing to make a program to do it; its that Apple went out of their way to make this impossible.  It's the first and last Apple product I'll ever make the mistake of buying.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And what kills me is that all of the iPhone limitations are caused by Apple being shitty company .
Seriously , Apple , why the fuck ca n't I sync my iPod Touch on Linux ?
It 's not that nobody is willing to make a program to do it ; its that Apple went out of their way to make this impossible .
It 's the first and last Apple product I 'll ever make the mistake of buying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And what kills me is that all of the iPhone limitations are caused by Apple being shitty company.
Seriously, Apple, why the fuck can't I sync my iPod Touch on Linux?
It's not that nobody is willing to make a program to do it; its that Apple went out of their way to make this impossible.
It's the first and last Apple product I'll ever make the mistake of buying.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040920</id>
	<title>Apple = A bunch of whining Pussies</title>
	<author>Jackie\_Chan\_Fan</author>
	<datestamp>1265372040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple is afraid of words now?</p><p>Google should just remove Apple and all Apple App related sites from its search index. Maybe that will teach Apple not to be such a bunch of whining pussies.</p><p>APPLE IS JUST AS EVIL AS MICROSOFT. We just like to ignore that fact because they're pretty.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple is afraid of words now ? Google should just remove Apple and all Apple App related sites from its search index .
Maybe that will teach Apple not to be such a bunch of whining pussies.APPLE IS JUST AS EVIL AS MICROSOFT .
We just like to ignore that fact because they 're pretty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple is afraid of words now?Google should just remove Apple and all Apple App related sites from its search index.
Maybe that will teach Apple not to be such a bunch of whining pussies.APPLE IS JUST AS EVIL AS MICROSOFT.
We just like to ignore that fact because they're pretty.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036564</id>
	<title>Chink in the armor?</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1265395080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stevie boy is finally cracking up?  This sounds like the (lost) battle with Microsoft back in the 80s.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stevie boy is finally cracking up ?
This sounds like the ( lost ) battle with Microsoft back in the 80s .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stevie boy is finally cracking up?
This sounds like the (lost) battle with Microsoft back in the 80s.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035934</id>
	<title>Was it your flash of stupidity you meant?</title>
	<author>ciroknight</author>
	<datestamp>1265392560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Does anybody think Barnes and Noble would be willing to post a sign saying your book was #38 in its category on Amazon?</i> <br> <br>
No, but I see all the time people with stickers on their book covers indicating their position on the New York Times Best Sellers list, or the Oprah Bookclub.
<br> <br>
<i>You can't expect to place ads for a competing store's award in another retail store.</i>
<br> <br>
This isn't that. This is advertising that you won a Fields Metal at a Nobel Consortium (with an enormous pinch of salt).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anybody think Barnes and Noble would be willing to post a sign saying your book was # 38 in its category on Amazon ?
No , but I see all the time people with stickers on their book covers indicating their position on the New York Times Best Sellers list , or the Oprah Bookclub .
You ca n't expect to place ads for a competing store 's award in another retail store .
This is n't that .
This is advertising that you won a Fields Metal at a Nobel Consortium ( with an enormous pinch of salt ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anybody think Barnes and Noble would be willing to post a sign saying your book was #38 in its category on Amazon?
No, but I see all the time people with stickers on their book covers indicating their position on the New York Times Best Sellers list, or the Oprah Bookclub.
You can't expect to place ads for a competing store's award in another retail store.
This isn't that.
This is advertising that you won a Fields Metal at a Nobel Consortium (with an enormous pinch of salt).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037048</id>
	<title>Re:No, but...</title>
	<author>DaveV1.0</author>
	<datestamp>1265397300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was going to mod the parent, but decided to correct you instead.</p><blockquote><div><p>No, but then Barnes and Noble isn't the only place you can sell your book. If you don't like their policies, you can also put it up for sale on Amazon, Books-A-Million, any number of local bookstores, and probably even stores like Wal-Mart, Target, etc.</p></div></blockquote><p>Here, let me fix that for you:</p><blockquote><div><p>No, but then iPhone App Store isn't the only place you can sell your software. If you don't like their policies, you can also put it up for sale in the Android Market, on the internet, any number of websites, and probably even stores like Wal-Mart, Target, etc.</p></div></blockquote><p>That the software can not be sold on Apple's proprietary web site if it's description mentions Apple's competitor does not prevent the author from selling it for use on non-Apple devices.</p><p>If HP did as you state, people would not buy the HP device. Instead they would buy from someone else. HP does not make the processor, motherboard, BIOS, or operating system. WinTel components are a commodity. Apple hardware and the Apple OSes are not commodity.</p><p>People tolerate it because they see value in Apple's name, reputation, and price. They want to play in Apple's sandbox.</p><p>If you don't want to play by Apple's rules, don't play in Apple's sandbox. Don't whine about it like the little bitch your<br>post makes you out to be.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was going to mod the parent , but decided to correct you instead.No , but then Barnes and Noble is n't the only place you can sell your book .
If you do n't like their policies , you can also put it up for sale on Amazon , Books-A-Million , any number of local bookstores , and probably even stores like Wal-Mart , Target , etc.Here , let me fix that for you : No , but then iPhone App Store is n't the only place you can sell your software .
If you do n't like their policies , you can also put it up for sale in the Android Market , on the internet , any number of websites , and probably even stores like Wal-Mart , Target , etc.That the software can not be sold on Apple 's proprietary web site if it 's description mentions Apple 's competitor does not prevent the author from selling it for use on non-Apple devices.If HP did as you state , people would not buy the HP device .
Instead they would buy from someone else .
HP does not make the processor , motherboard , BIOS , or operating system .
WinTel components are a commodity .
Apple hardware and the Apple OSes are not commodity.People tolerate it because they see value in Apple 's name , reputation , and price .
They want to play in Apple 's sandbox.If you do n't want to play by Apple 's rules , do n't play in Apple 's sandbox .
Do n't whine about it like the little bitch yourpost makes you out to be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was going to mod the parent, but decided to correct you instead.No, but then Barnes and Noble isn't the only place you can sell your book.
If you don't like their policies, you can also put it up for sale on Amazon, Books-A-Million, any number of local bookstores, and probably even stores like Wal-Mart, Target, etc.Here, let me fix that for you:No, but then iPhone App Store isn't the only place you can sell your software.
If you don't like their policies, you can also put it up for sale in the Android Market, on the internet, any number of websites, and probably even stores like Wal-Mart, Target, etc.That the software can not be sold on Apple's proprietary web site if it's description mentions Apple's competitor does not prevent the author from selling it for use on non-Apple devices.If HP did as you state, people would not buy the HP device.
Instead they would buy from someone else.
HP does not make the processor, motherboard, BIOS, or operating system.
WinTel components are a commodity.
Apple hardware and the Apple OSes are not commodity.People tolerate it because they see value in Apple's name, reputation, and price.
They want to play in Apple's sandbox.If you don't want to play by Apple's rules, don't play in Apple's sandbox.
Don't whine about it like the little bitch yourpost makes you out to be.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036182</id>
	<title>Re:When is this ever false?</title>
	<author>bhartman34</author>
	<datestamp>1265393580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Except, in this case, Apple didn't even <i>start</i> with the best of intentions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except , in this case , Apple did n't even start with the best of intentions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except, in this case, Apple didn't even start with the best of intentions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040096</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1265367600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I dislike iTunes and it is indeed slow to start  but it's been anything but buggy when I have used it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I dislike iTunes and it is indeed slow to start but it 's been anything but buggy when I have used it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dislike iTunes and it is indeed slow to start  but it's been anything but buggy when I have used it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036570</id>
	<title>We don't serve their kind here!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265395080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>
Your droids<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... They'll have to wait outside.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your droids ... They 'll have to wait outside .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Your droids ... They'll have to wait outside.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036598</id>
	<title>503'd!</title>
	<author>BerretSO4</author>
	<datestamp>1265395200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Service Temporarily Unavailable
The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later.

^^ The Slashdot Effect is with us and very, very real, my friends.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Service Temporarily Unavailable The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems .
Please try again later .
^ ^ The Slashdot Effect is with us and very , very real , my friends .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Service Temporarily Unavailable
The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems.
Please try again later.
^^ The Slashdot Effect is with us and very, very real, my friends.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038832</id>
	<title>Re:Android</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265361840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There actually is an app for that, but Apple doesn't want you to know about it.</p><p>Apple - turn off your brain and open your wallet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There actually is an app for that , but Apple does n't want you to know about it.Apple - turn off your brain and open your wallet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There actually is an app for that, but Apple doesn't want you to know about it.Apple - turn off your brain and open your wallet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037122</id>
	<title>Re:Appstore model is broken</title>
	<author>prockcore</author>
	<datestamp>1265397660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It works perfectly for users.</p></div></blockquote><p>Except it doesn't.  If it did work perfectly for the users, I would have google voice and latitude on my iphone.</p><p>Instead I am forced to use inferior web versions of those two apps.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It works perfectly for users.Except it does n't .
If it did work perfectly for the users , I would have google voice and latitude on my iphone.Instead I am forced to use inferior web versions of those two apps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It works perfectly for users.Except it doesn't.
If it did work perfectly for the users, I would have google voice and latitude on my iphone.Instead I am forced to use inferior web versions of those two apps.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040806</id>
	<title>Iwhat?</title>
	<author>flyneye</author>
	<datestamp>1265371320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree 100\%, When the other phones on the horizon are breathing down his neck and better plans will come with them, the time to get snitty to developers isn't now. This isn't like old school punk where you can alienate the audience and get away with it either. The Ipad isn't going to provide any level of protection even if you added absorbent wings and will soon be overwhelmed by competitors out for blood.<br>Granpa' Jobs business model is as obsolete as the music industry and Macintosh will soon be fossilizing along with it. Hard to convince people how cool you are when you act like such an asshole.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; C'mon now,how many Moonies left the cult when their phones got bricked? When their Imacs turned to obsolete junk? How about Ipod antics? You can't keep peeing in the soup and expect company to stay for dinner.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree 100 \ % , When the other phones on the horizon are breathing down his neck and better plans will come with them , the time to get snitty to developers is n't now .
This is n't like old school punk where you can alienate the audience and get away with it either .
The Ipad is n't going to provide any level of protection even if you added absorbent wings and will soon be overwhelmed by competitors out for blood.Granpa ' Jobs business model is as obsolete as the music industry and Macintosh will soon be fossilizing along with it .
Hard to convince people how cool you are when you act like such an asshole .
          C'mon now,how many Moonies left the cult when their phones got bricked ?
When their Imacs turned to obsolete junk ?
How about Ipod antics ?
You ca n't keep peeing in the soup and expect company to stay for dinner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree 100\%, When the other phones on the horizon are breathing down his neck and better plans will come with them, the time to get snitty to developers isn't now.
This isn't like old school punk where you can alienate the audience and get away with it either.
The Ipad isn't going to provide any level of protection even if you added absorbent wings and will soon be overwhelmed by competitors out for blood.Granpa' Jobs business model is as obsolete as the music industry and Macintosh will soon be fossilizing along with it.
Hard to convince people how cool you are when you act like such an asshole.
          C'mon now,how many Moonies left the cult when their phones got bricked?
When their Imacs turned to obsolete junk?
How about Ipod antics?
You can't keep peeing in the soup and expect company to stay for dinner.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037408</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040888</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>YourExperiment</author>
	<datestamp>1265371800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly - that would be like having Marvin on board the Heart of Gold.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly - that would be like having Marvin on board the Heart of Gold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly - that would be like having Marvin on board the Heart of Gold.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036292</id>
	<title>Clicking on the blog link...</title>
	<author>Somebody Is Using My</author>
	<datestamp>1265394000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It amused me that when I clicked on the link to the blog, I was returned a "503: Service Not Available" page.</p><p>I guess they are being hammered by Slashdot traffic right now, but I thought it also was a curiously coincidental comment on Apple's own response to their app.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It amused me that when I clicked on the link to the blog , I was returned a " 503 : Service Not Available " page.I guess they are being hammered by Slashdot traffic right now , but I thought it also was a curiously coincidental comment on Apple 's own response to their app .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It amused me that when I clicked on the link to the blog, I was returned a "503: Service Not Available" page.I guess they are being hammered by Slashdot traffic right now, but I thought it also was a curiously coincidental comment on Apple's own response to their app.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040182</id>
	<title>Re:Remember a time..</title>
	<author>stewbacca</author>
	<datestamp>1265367960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At my software company, we're not in the business of giving free advertising to our competitors by mentioning them as our competitors in our documentation or our user manuals.</p><p>I would posit that removing the name of your competition from the liner notes of your product would be the epitome of competitive behavior, not anti-competitive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At my software company , we 're not in the business of giving free advertising to our competitors by mentioning them as our competitors in our documentation or our user manuals.I would posit that removing the name of your competition from the liner notes of your product would be the epitome of competitive behavior , not anti-competitive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At my software company, we're not in the business of giving free advertising to our competitors by mentioning them as our competitors in our documentation or our user manuals.I would posit that removing the name of your competition from the liner notes of your product would be the epitome of competitive behavior, not anti-competitive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037212</id>
	<title>Re:Was it your flash of stupidity you meant?</title>
	<author>DaveV1.0</author>
	<datestamp>1265397960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>No, but I see all the time people with stickers on their book covers indicating their position on the New York Times Best Sellers list, or the Oprah Bookclub.</p></div></blockquote><p>Neither the NY Times nor Oprah sell books directly to the public; Amazon, Borders, and Books-A-Million do. That is why Barnes and Noble, Amazon, Borders, and Books-A-Million will put those "NYT Best Seller" and "Oprah Bookclub" sticker on books but not "#3 best seller at " stickers. Google competes directly against Apple in that space.</p><blockquote><div><p>This is advertising that you won a Fields Metal at a Nobel Consortium (with an enormous pinch of salt).</p></div></blockquote><p>No, it isn't because the Nobel Consortium is an independent body who does not compete against others. This is saying one won a competition hosted by it's direct competitor. Here, let me fix your analogy so it is more appropriate:</p><blockquote><div><p>This is advertising that you won a <i>Nobel Prize in Literature</i>.</p></div></blockquote><p>The Nobel Committee is not a general book seller. This is very different saying one won "#1 favorite read as voted on by the customers of Amazon". That is a sticker you won't see on a book at B&amp;N, Borders, etc.</p><p>Your post is nothing but a red herring.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , but I see all the time people with stickers on their book covers indicating their position on the New York Times Best Sellers list , or the Oprah Bookclub.Neither the NY Times nor Oprah sell books directly to the public ; Amazon , Borders , and Books-A-Million do .
That is why Barnes and Noble , Amazon , Borders , and Books-A-Million will put those " NYT Best Seller " and " Oprah Bookclub " sticker on books but not " # 3 best seller at " stickers .
Google competes directly against Apple in that space.This is advertising that you won a Fields Metal at a Nobel Consortium ( with an enormous pinch of salt ) .No , it is n't because the Nobel Consortium is an independent body who does not compete against others .
This is saying one won a competition hosted by it 's direct competitor .
Here , let me fix your analogy so it is more appropriate : This is advertising that you won a Nobel Prize in Literature.The Nobel Committee is not a general book seller .
This is very different saying one won " # 1 favorite read as voted on by the customers of Amazon " .
That is a sticker you wo n't see on a book at B&amp;N , Borders , etc.Your post is nothing but a red herring .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, but I see all the time people with stickers on their book covers indicating their position on the New York Times Best Sellers list, or the Oprah Bookclub.Neither the NY Times nor Oprah sell books directly to the public; Amazon, Borders, and Books-A-Million do.
That is why Barnes and Noble, Amazon, Borders, and Books-A-Million will put those "NYT Best Seller" and "Oprah Bookclub" sticker on books but not "#3 best seller at " stickers.
Google competes directly against Apple in that space.This is advertising that you won a Fields Metal at a Nobel Consortium (with an enormous pinch of salt).No, it isn't because the Nobel Consortium is an independent body who does not compete against others.
This is saying one won a competition hosted by it's direct competitor.
Here, let me fix your analogy so it is more appropriate:This is advertising that you won a Nobel Prize in Literature.The Nobel Committee is not a general book seller.
This is very different saying one won "#1 favorite read as voted on by the customers of Amazon".
That is a sticker you won't see on a book at B&amp;N, Borders, etc.Your post is nothing but a red herring.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039244</id>
	<title>Re:No, but...</title>
	<author>zzsmirkzz</author>
	<datestamp>1265363700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't their some sort of AntiTrust law that prevents a company from leveraging their dominant position (i.e. monopoly) in one market (Hardware device) to gain dominance over another market (software). It boggles my mind that state AG's haven't joined together to bring this in front of the DoJ and all sue the pants off of Apple for doing this especially the states that really need the money. I see it as no better than Microsoft bundling IE with Windows, even though on Windows you <i>could</i> install another browser of your choice very easily.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't their some sort of AntiTrust law that prevents a company from leveraging their dominant position ( i.e .
monopoly ) in one market ( Hardware device ) to gain dominance over another market ( software ) .
It boggles my mind that state AG 's have n't joined together to bring this in front of the DoJ and all sue the pants off of Apple for doing this especially the states that really need the money .
I see it as no better than Microsoft bundling IE with Windows , even though on Windows you could install another browser of your choice very easily .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't their some sort of AntiTrust law that prevents a company from leveraging their dominant position (i.e.
monopoly) in one market (Hardware device) to gain dominance over another market (software).
It boggles my mind that state AG's haven't joined together to bring this in front of the DoJ and all sue the pants off of Apple for doing this especially the states that really need the money.
I see it as no better than Microsoft bundling IE with Windows, even though on Windows you could install another browser of your choice very easily.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036868</id>
	<title>"Vote with your feet"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265396400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can talk about how bad this is all you want, but if you really want to make a difference vote with your feet, I was looking to buy iPad when it's out, NO MORE and I'm switching to Google Android Phone!  Censor this!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can talk about how bad this is all you want , but if you really want to make a difference vote with your feet , I was looking to buy iPad when it 's out , NO MORE and I 'm switching to Google Android Phone !
Censor this !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can talk about how bad this is all you want, but if you really want to make a difference vote with your feet, I was looking to buy iPad when it's out, NO MORE and I'm switching to Google Android Phone!
Censor this!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040136</id>
	<title>hugh</title>
	<author>MemoryDragon</author>
	<datestamp>1265367720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Steve has spoken lets worship our savior and f&#252;hrer...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Steve has spoken lets worship our savior and f   hrer.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Steve has spoken lets worship our savior and führer...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037408</id>
	<title>Re:Android</title>
	<author>BemoanAndMoan</author>
	<datestamp>1265398800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Jobs is sliding from Hero to Zero; tantrums and school-boy ethics aren't going to win him support in any community.

</p><p>Next up: pop-ups in Safari that chastise you for being 'un-Apple' when you search via Google.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow ... Jobs is sliding from Hero to Zero ; tantrums and school-boy ethics are n't going to win him support in any community .
Next up : pop-ups in Safari that chastise you for being 'un-Apple ' when you search via Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow ... Jobs is sliding from Hero to Zero; tantrums and school-boy ethics aren't going to win him support in any community.
Next up: pop-ups in Safari that chastise you for being 'un-Apple' when you search via Google.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037556</id>
	<title>Oh poor them</title>
	<author>HenryKoren</author>
	<datestamp>1265399700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This rejection must have hurt them dearly.  I mean, getting front page coverage on Slashdot must have really damaged their app sales.  I weep for them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This rejection must have hurt them dearly .
I mean , getting front page coverage on Slashdot must have really damaged their app sales .
I weep for them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This rejection must have hurt them dearly.
I mean, getting front page coverage on Slashdot must have really damaged their app sales.
I weep for them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038450</id>
	<title>Re:No, but...</title>
	<author>Internal Modem</author>
	<datestamp>1265403420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple isn't the only place one can sell software...or software for mobile phones...or Flash of Genius for mobile phones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple is n't the only place one can sell software...or software for mobile phones...or Flash of Genius for mobile phones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple isn't the only place one can sell software...or software for mobile phones...or Flash of Genius for mobile phones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035810</id>
	<title>When is this ever false?</title>
	<author>QuoteMstr</author>
	<datestamp>1265392080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even if beginning with the best of intentions, a censor will <b>always</b>, eventually, come to use his power to censor to benefit himself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if beginning with the best of intentions , a censor will always , eventually , come to use his power to censor to benefit himself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if beginning with the best of intentions, a censor will always, eventually, come to use his power to censor to benefit himself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036700</id>
	<title>Re:Appstore model is broken</title>
	<author>Dog-Cow</author>
	<datestamp>1265395680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It works perfectly for users.  Apple doesn't care about the developers.  It never has.</p><p>Users have a simple App to access the store.  All the apps are tested for compatibility, and the store won't let or will warn if you try to purchase an app that is not compatible with your device.  The apps are tested to ensure they follow basic UI guidelines and that they fail gracefully when connectivity is limited or unavailable.  Purely as a user, what's not to like?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It works perfectly for users .
Apple does n't care about the developers .
It never has.Users have a simple App to access the store .
All the apps are tested for compatibility , and the store wo n't let or will warn if you try to purchase an app that is not compatible with your device .
The apps are tested to ensure they follow basic UI guidelines and that they fail gracefully when connectivity is limited or unavailable .
Purely as a user , what 's not to like ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It works perfectly for users.
Apple doesn't care about the developers.
It never has.Users have a simple App to access the store.
All the apps are tested for compatibility, and the store won't let or will warn if you try to purchase an app that is not compatible with your device.
The apps are tested to ensure they follow basic UI guidelines and that they fail gracefully when connectivity is limited or unavailable.
Purely as a user, what's not to like?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036478</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>Lunix Nutcase</author>
	<datestamp>1265394720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It'll probably start with the developers. They'll get sick and tired of paying $99 a year just to develop goddamn cell phone apps. They'll get sick and tired of Apple's unnecessary censorship and app publication restrictions. They'll move to more open platforms.</p></div><p>That's amusing considering the app developer himself says: "Apple is a wonderful company to work with."</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It'll continue with the users. Those, such as yourself, who buy Apple products expecting a useful product will become dismayed, never buy another Apple product, and will suggest to other people that they also avoid Apple.</p></div><p>You widely overestimate the impact of the whining of a bunch of Slashtards on Apple's consumers. Why would they get dismayed when Apple has huge customer satisfaction?  The world at large doesn't care what a bunch of DRM-whining neckbeards think, no matter how much you wish it so.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 'll probably start with the developers .
They 'll get sick and tired of paying $ 99 a year just to develop goddamn cell phone apps .
They 'll get sick and tired of Apple 's unnecessary censorship and app publication restrictions .
They 'll move to more open platforms.That 's amusing considering the app developer himself says : " Apple is a wonderful company to work with .
" It 'll continue with the users .
Those , such as yourself , who buy Apple products expecting a useful product will become dismayed , never buy another Apple product , and will suggest to other people that they also avoid Apple.You widely overestimate the impact of the whining of a bunch of Slashtards on Apple 's consumers .
Why would they get dismayed when Apple has huge customer satisfaction ?
The world at large does n't care what a bunch of DRM-whining neckbeards think , no matter how much you wish it so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It'll probably start with the developers.
They'll get sick and tired of paying $99 a year just to develop goddamn cell phone apps.
They'll get sick and tired of Apple's unnecessary censorship and app publication restrictions.
They'll move to more open platforms.That's amusing considering the app developer himself says: "Apple is a wonderful company to work with.
"It'll continue with the users.
Those, such as yourself, who buy Apple products expecting a useful product will become dismayed, never buy another Apple product, and will suggest to other people that they also avoid Apple.You widely overestimate the impact of the whining of a bunch of Slashtards on Apple's consumers.
Why would they get dismayed when Apple has huge customer satisfaction?
The world at large doesn't care what a bunch of DRM-whining neckbeards think, no matter how much you wish it so.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037164</id>
	<title>Re:Objectively speaking...</title>
	<author>prockcore</author>
	<datestamp>1265397780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Why is Apple demonized for not willing to subsidize their competitors advertising?</p></div></blockquote><p>How are they subsidizing anything?  Is Apple paying people to write iPhone Apps now?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is Apple demonized for not willing to subsidize their competitors advertising ? How are they subsidizing anything ?
Is Apple paying people to write iPhone Apps now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is Apple demonized for not willing to subsidize their competitors advertising?How are they subsidizing anything?
Is Apple paying people to write iPhone Apps now?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036464</id>
	<title>Shame on Apple for taking this route</title>
	<author>StuartHankins</author>
	<datestamp>1265394660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Jeez, Apple, what were you thinking when you did this? You come across as a bully. As a Mac user I'm disappointed.<br> <br> <em>1999 iMac DV SE, 200? eMac, multiple iPod shuffles, 2.4 duo 15" MacBook Pro, iPod Touch 2G, iPhone 3GS</em></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jeez , Apple , what were you thinking when you did this ?
You come across as a bully .
As a Mac user I 'm disappointed .
1999 iMac DV SE , 200 ?
eMac , multiple iPod shuffles , 2.4 duo 15 " MacBook Pro , iPod Touch 2G , iPhone 3GS</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jeez, Apple, what were you thinking when you did this?
You come across as a bully.
As a Mac user I'm disappointed.
1999 iMac DV SE, 200?
eMac, multiple iPod shuffles, 2.4 duo 15" MacBook Pro, iPod Touch 2G, iPhone 3GS</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31041058</id>
	<title>Re:The wording of Apple's reply</title>
	<author>jo42</author>
	<datestamp>1265372880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Finalist in Google's Android Developer's Challenge!"</p></div><p>Change the wording to "Finalist in Evil-Privacy-Invading-Corporation's Humanoid-form-Robot Developer's Challenge!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Finalist in Google 's Android Developer 's Challenge !
" Change the wording to " Finalist in Evil-Privacy-Invading-Corporation 's Humanoid-form-Robot Developer 's Challenge !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Finalist in Google's Android Developer's Challenge!
"Change the wording to "Finalist in Evil-Privacy-Invading-Corporation's Humanoid-form-Robot Developer's Challenge!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037338</id>
	<title>Re:Android</title>
	<author>Mister Whirly</author>
	<datestamp>1265398440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, but there is a <a href="http://apple.slashdot.org/submission/1166664/Android-is-forbidden-in-iPhone-App-Store" title="slashdot.org">dupe</a> [slashdot.org] for that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , but there is a dupe [ slashdot.org ] for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, but there is a dupe [slashdot.org] for that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038192</id>
	<title>Re:Android</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265402280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This doesn't bode well for my "Apple Sucks My Dirty, Dirty Balls While I Make My Calls From A Phone Not Made For A Woman" app...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This does n't bode well for my " Apple Sucks My Dirty , Dirty Balls While I Make My Calls From A Phone Not Made For A Woman " app.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This doesn't bode well for my "Apple Sucks My Dirty, Dirty Balls While I Make My Calls From A Phone Not Made For A Woman" app...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037012</id>
	<title>Re:Makes Sense</title>
	<author>vtavares</author>
	<datestamp>1265397180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really? I take it mean that it's a good app. But then again, I don't drink the Apple Kool-Aid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
I take it mean that it 's a good app .
But then again , I do n't drink the Apple Kool-Aid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
I take it mean that it's a good app.
But then again, I don't drink the Apple Kool-Aid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036734</id>
	<title>Re:The wording of Apple's reply</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265395800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, Apple seems to be politely and diplomatically enforcing its policies.  Although it'd be nice for the app store approval process to get easier, would you have preferred them to have rejected the app outright instead?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , Apple seems to be politely and diplomatically enforcing its policies .
Although it 'd be nice for the app store approval process to get easier , would you have preferred them to have rejected the app outright instead ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, Apple seems to be politely and diplomatically enforcing its policies.
Although it'd be nice for the app store approval process to get easier, would you have preferred them to have rejected the app outright instead?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037348</id>
	<title>Re:Flash of stupidity...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265398500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's not the same thing. If the Post had a section for authors or publishers to put in their own sales pitch, and someone decided to put in favorable reviews by other companies, that'd be about the same. A dead-on analogy would be if a blurb on an Amazon product page had "Barnes &amp; Noble Top Pick!" listed. Does that happen?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not the same thing .
If the Post had a section for authors or publishers to put in their own sales pitch , and someone decided to put in favorable reviews by other companies , that 'd be about the same .
A dead-on analogy would be if a blurb on an Amazon product page had " Barnes &amp; Noble Top Pick !
" listed .
Does that happen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not the same thing.
If the Post had a section for authors or publishers to put in their own sales pitch, and someone decided to put in favorable reviews by other companies, that'd be about the same.
A dead-on analogy would be if a blurb on an Amazon product page had "Barnes &amp; Noble Top Pick!
" listed.
Does that happen?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038662</id>
	<title>Re:When is this ever false?</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1265361060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remember the time<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... when people didn't just use the word censor to garner attention?  You know back when it was actually used for real issues, not trivial marketing BS that could easily be explained off by the simple fact that the statement in reference is irrelevant to all those looking at it, and potentially confusing the less sophisticated users of what was designed to be a consumer device, not techie toy?</p><p>When you use that word this way, you do nothing but lower its impact and make yourself sound irrational.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember the time ... when people did n't just use the word censor to garner attention ?
You know back when it was actually used for real issues , not trivial marketing BS that could easily be explained off by the simple fact that the statement in reference is irrelevant to all those looking at it , and potentially confusing the less sophisticated users of what was designed to be a consumer device , not techie toy ? When you use that word this way , you do nothing but lower its impact and make yourself sound irrational .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember the time ... when people didn't just use the word censor to garner attention?
You know back when it was actually used for real issues, not trivial marketing BS that could easily be explained off by the simple fact that the statement in reference is irrelevant to all those looking at it, and potentially confusing the less sophisticated users of what was designed to be a consumer device, not techie toy?When you use that word this way, you do nothing but lower its impact and make yourself sound irrational.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037344</id>
	<title>Re:When is this ever false?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265398500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Satie is a fictional character, of course, but it's likely that he was speaking about <i>government</i> censorship. Until and unless Apple can put people in jail (or worse), I'd say that such implied comparisons are at best overblown.</p><p>And if anyone makes a "there's an app for that" joke about jail, they probably should be sent to one immediately.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Satie is a fictional character , of course , but it 's likely that he was speaking about government censorship .
Until and unless Apple can put people in jail ( or worse ) , I 'd say that such implied comparisons are at best overblown.And if anyone makes a " there 's an app for that " joke about jail , they probably should be sent to one immediately .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Satie is a fictional character, of course, but it's likely that he was speaking about government censorship.
Until and unless Apple can put people in jail (or worse), I'd say that such implied comparisons are at best overblown.And if anyone makes a "there's an app for that" joke about jail, they probably should be sent to one immediately.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037754</id>
	<title>Re:Remember a time..</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1265400600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not anti-competitive to choose not to sell a product in your store.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not anti-competitive to choose not to sell a product in your store .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not anti-competitive to choose not to sell a product in your store.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036298</id>
	<title>Re:Flash of stupidity...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265394000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Best Buy will post an ad saying the censored version of your album is a Wal-Mart exclusive</p></div></blockquote><p>That wouldn't exactly be advertisement for Wal-Mart, though; rather the opposite.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Best Buy will post an ad saying the censored version of your album is a Wal-Mart exclusiveThat would n't exactly be advertisement for Wal-Mart , though ; rather the opposite .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Best Buy will post an ad saying the censored version of your album is a Wal-Mart exclusiveThat wouldn't exactly be advertisement for Wal-Mart, though; rather the opposite.
:P
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036354</id>
	<title>Creativity, so long as we approve of it</title>
	<author>Moheeheeko</author>
	<datestamp>1265394300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>HEIL JOBS!</htmltext>
<tokenext>HEIL JOBS !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>HEIL JOBS!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039906</id>
	<title>Correcting false advertising is not evil.</title>
	<author>drewm1980</author>
	<datestamp>1265366760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was the ~android version of the app won an award.  For these tiny applications, the GUI practically ~is the application.  Claiming that the iPhone version of the app won an award is simply false advertising, so Apple tactfully asked them to fix the language.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was the ~ android version of the app won an award .
For these tiny applications , the GUI practically ~ is the application .
Claiming that the iPhone version of the app won an award is simply false advertising , so Apple tactfully asked them to fix the language .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was the ~android version of the app won an award.
For these tiny applications, the GUI practically ~is the application.
Claiming that the iPhone version of the app won an award is simply false advertising, so Apple tactfully asked them to fix the language.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036388</id>
	<title>Objectively speaking...</title>
	<author>Phizzle</author>
	<datestamp>1265394420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why is Apple demonized for not willing to subsidize their competitors advertising?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is Apple demonized for not willing to subsidize their competitors advertising ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is Apple demonized for not willing to subsidize their competitors advertising?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036100</id>
	<title>re</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265393220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i, for one, welcome our new apple overlord</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i , for one , welcome our new apple overlord</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i, for one, welcome our new apple overlord</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040954</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>ErkDemon</author>
	<datestamp>1265372220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had a cheap (circa ~GBP 15) Samsung MP3 player that someone gave away as part of a deal. It didn't function as a USB storage device, and had its own special syncing and indexing software that ran on the host computer. Like Apple.</p><p>Seems that that's why Samsung had to get rid of the stock by jobbing it out to a company that used them as promotional giveaways. People kept bringing them back to the shops and demanding refunds, on the grounds that a fifteen quid USB MP3 player wasn't fit for sale if it didn't show up as a standard storage device when you plugged it into a USB port.<br>Samsung them brought out a firmware update that let you ignore its expensive proprietary synching and indexing software and just dump folders of music onto it, and people were happy (other than the Samsung engineers, who still seemed convinced that their approach was better, and a little put out by the threats of physical violence from aggrieved customers).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had a cheap ( circa ~ GBP 15 ) Samsung MP3 player that someone gave away as part of a deal .
It did n't function as a USB storage device , and had its own special syncing and indexing software that ran on the host computer .
Like Apple.Seems that that 's why Samsung had to get rid of the stock by jobbing it out to a company that used them as promotional giveaways .
People kept bringing them back to the shops and demanding refunds , on the grounds that a fifteen quid USB MP3 player was n't fit for sale if it did n't show up as a standard storage device when you plugged it into a USB port.Samsung them brought out a firmware update that let you ignore its expensive proprietary synching and indexing software and just dump folders of music onto it , and people were happy ( other than the Samsung engineers , who still seemed convinced that their approach was better , and a little put out by the threats of physical violence from aggrieved customers ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had a cheap (circa ~GBP 15) Samsung MP3 player that someone gave away as part of a deal.
It didn't function as a USB storage device, and had its own special syncing and indexing software that ran on the host computer.
Like Apple.Seems that that's why Samsung had to get rid of the stock by jobbing it out to a company that used them as promotional giveaways.
People kept bringing them back to the shops and demanding refunds, on the grounds that a fifteen quid USB MP3 player wasn't fit for sale if it didn't show up as a standard storage device when you plugged it into a USB port.Samsung them brought out a firmware update that let you ignore its expensive proprietary synching and indexing software and just dump folders of music onto it, and people were happy (other than the Samsung engineers, who still seemed convinced that their approach was better, and a little put out by the threats of physical violence from aggrieved customers).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038580</id>
	<title>Re:Remember a time..</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1265360820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>basically that's like Microsoft telling an app vendor that their app will be erased from all Windows users' PCs if the app's packaging contains a "compatible with Mac" logo.</p></div></blockquote><p>No, it would be like Microsoft telling you can't put the App on Windows Marketplace for saying '2010 award that no one knows about for Macs!' on software that was only going to work on Windows.</p><p>The store doesn't sell Android apps, the blurb could most certainly confuse people who have no idea what Android is, which is most of the iPhone users of the world.</p><p>Its not like you're buying a app from the AppStore that will run on Android, it won't.  And its unlikely that an iPhone user will have an Android device, highly unlikely.  Even so they'd have to buy another copy from somewhere else.  You won't find a Windows only boxed application that says compatible with Mac.  You won't see 'compatible with mac' on the box for Office 2007, even though you can buy Office 2008 for a Mac.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>basically that 's like Microsoft telling an app vendor that their app will be erased from all Windows users ' PCs if the app 's packaging contains a " compatible with Mac " logo.No , it would be like Microsoft telling you ca n't put the App on Windows Marketplace for saying '2010 award that no one knows about for Macs !
' on software that was only going to work on Windows.The store does n't sell Android apps , the blurb could most certainly confuse people who have no idea what Android is , which is most of the iPhone users of the world.Its not like you 're buying a app from the AppStore that will run on Android , it wo n't .
And its unlikely that an iPhone user will have an Android device , highly unlikely .
Even so they 'd have to buy another copy from somewhere else .
You wo n't find a Windows only boxed application that says compatible with Mac .
You wo n't see 'compatible with mac ' on the box for Office 2007 , even though you can buy Office 2008 for a Mac .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>basically that's like Microsoft telling an app vendor that their app will be erased from all Windows users' PCs if the app's packaging contains a "compatible with Mac" logo.No, it would be like Microsoft telling you can't put the App on Windows Marketplace for saying '2010 award that no one knows about for Macs!
' on software that was only going to work on Windows.The store doesn't sell Android apps, the blurb could most certainly confuse people who have no idea what Android is, which is most of the iPhone users of the world.Its not like you're buying a app from the AppStore that will run on Android, it won't.
And its unlikely that an iPhone user will have an Android device, highly unlikely.
Even so they'd have to buy another copy from somewhere else.
You won't find a Windows only boxed application that says compatible with Mac.
You won't see 'compatible with mac' on the box for Office 2007, even though you can buy Office 2008 for a Mac.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037972</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265401500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>My mother gave my son a 32G iPod touch for Christmas. The iPod itself is a fantastic piece of gear but every time I have to launch iTunes to sync music into it I go on a 15 minute profanity riddled rant. iTunes is buggy, slow, and generally the biggest pile of shit software that I am forced to use. To say that I hate it with the intensity of a thousand burning stars would be an \_understatement\_.</p><p>Why, oh why, won't Apple let me push music to it like every other, non-Apple, media player that we own?</p><p>Steve Jobs deserves to be kicked in the DICK for this, hard.</p></div><p>Anonymous Coward here...</p><p>I agree with all this anti-Apple stuff, but alas I too own an iPod.</p><p>BUT, through the wizardry of SharePod (sharepod.com) I can use it without having to create new expletives to describe the emotions that arise when using iTunes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My mother gave my son a 32G iPod touch for Christmas .
The iPod itself is a fantastic piece of gear but every time I have to launch iTunes to sync music into it I go on a 15 minute profanity riddled rant .
iTunes is buggy , slow , and generally the biggest pile of shit software that I am forced to use .
To say that I hate it with the intensity of a thousand burning stars would be an \ _understatement \ _.Why , oh why , wo n't Apple let me push music to it like every other , non-Apple , media player that we own ? Steve Jobs deserves to be kicked in the DICK for this , hard.Anonymous Coward here...I agree with all this anti-Apple stuff , but alas I too own an iPod.BUT , through the wizardry of SharePod ( sharepod.com ) I can use it without having to create new expletives to describe the emotions that arise when using iTunes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My mother gave my son a 32G iPod touch for Christmas.
The iPod itself is a fantastic piece of gear but every time I have to launch iTunes to sync music into it I go on a 15 minute profanity riddled rant.
iTunes is buggy, slow, and generally the biggest pile of shit software that I am forced to use.
To say that I hate it with the intensity of a thousand burning stars would be an \_understatement\_.Why, oh why, won't Apple let me push music to it like every other, non-Apple, media player that we own?Steve Jobs deserves to be kicked in the DICK for this, hard.Anonymous Coward here...I agree with all this anti-Apple stuff, but alas I too own an iPod.BUT, through the wizardry of SharePod (sharepod.com) I can use it without having to create new expletives to describe the emotions that arise when using iTunes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035954</id>
	<title>Re:The wording of Apple's reply</title>
	<author>solevita</author>
	<datestamp>1265392620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>According to TFA, Apple apparently replied with "503 Service Temporarily Unavailable". Harsh but fair.</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to TFA , Apple apparently replied with " 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable " .
Harsh but fair .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to TFA, Apple apparently replied with "503 Service Temporarily Unavailable".
Harsh but fair.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776</id>
	<title>Flash of stupidity...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265391960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm with Apple on this one. Does anybody think Barnes and Noble would be willing to post a sign saying your book was #38 in its category on Amazon? Do you think Best Buy will post an ad saying the censored version of your album is a Wal-Mart exclusive?</p><p>You can't expect to place ads for a competing store's award in another retail store.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm with Apple on this one .
Does anybody think Barnes and Noble would be willing to post a sign saying your book was # 38 in its category on Amazon ?
Do you think Best Buy will post an ad saying the censored version of your album is a Wal-Mart exclusive ? You ca n't expect to place ads for a competing store 's award in another retail store .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm with Apple on this one.
Does anybody think Barnes and Noble would be willing to post a sign saying your book was #38 in its category on Amazon?
Do you think Best Buy will post an ad saying the censored version of your album is a Wal-Mart exclusive?You can't expect to place ads for a competing store's award in another retail store.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039982</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1265367180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Apple can't have Android inside Steve Jobs' Reality Distortion Field.</i></p><p>The iPad fisco shows that the field is no longer in effect.  I suspect this proves it was actually generated by his original liver.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple ca n't have Android inside Steve Jobs ' Reality Distortion Field.The iPad fisco shows that the field is no longer in effect .
I suspect this proves it was actually generated by his original liver .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple can't have Android inside Steve Jobs' Reality Distortion Field.The iPad fisco shows that the field is no longer in effect.
I suspect this proves it was actually generated by his original liver.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036120</id>
	<title>Censorship - of course</title>
	<author>walt77</author>
	<datestamp>1265393340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We shouldn't be too surprised as censorship is among the usual tools of choice for dictatorial governments. Who expected benevolence?</htmltext>
<tokenext>We should n't be too surprised as censorship is among the usual tools of choice for dictatorial governments .
Who expected benevolence ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We shouldn't be too surprised as censorship is among the usual tools of choice for dictatorial governments.
Who expected benevolence?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038264</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>mypalmike</author>
	<datestamp>1265402580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Steve Jobs deserves to be kicked in the DICK for this, hard.</p><p>Right, because obviously Steve Jobs personally reviewed this app, as he does all submitted apps.  Indeed, everything Apple does, good or bad, is because Steve personally did it.  He personally tests every iPod that gets sold, codes up bugs in Safari, and runs the cnc machine that bores out unibody Aluminum MacBook Pros.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Steve Jobs deserves to be kicked in the DICK for this , hard.Right , because obviously Steve Jobs personally reviewed this app , as he does all submitted apps .
Indeed , everything Apple does , good or bad , is because Steve personally did it .
He personally tests every iPod that gets sold , codes up bugs in Safari , and runs the cnc machine that bores out unibody Aluminum MacBook Pros .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Steve Jobs deserves to be kicked in the DICK for this, hard.Right, because obviously Steve Jobs personally reviewed this app, as he does all submitted apps.
Indeed, everything Apple does, good or bad, is because Steve personally did it.
He personally tests every iPod that gets sold, codes up bugs in Safari, and runs the cnc machine that bores out unibody Aluminum MacBook Pros.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035816</id>
	<title>Remember a time..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265392140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does anyone remember way back when anti-competitive behavior was illegal? I guess it just depends on which company does it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone remember way back when anti-competitive behavior was illegal ?
I guess it just depends on which company does it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone remember way back when anti-competitive behavior was illegal?
I guess it just depends on which company does it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037634</id>
	<title>The new smash hit Apple TV commercial...</title>
	<author>dskoll</author>
	<datestamp>1265400120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Announcer: Buy an iPhone and see why 2010 will be like "1984"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Announcer : Buy an iPhone and see why 2010 will be like " 1984 "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Announcer: Buy an iPhone and see why 2010 will be like "1984"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038350</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>techwrench</author>
	<datestamp>1265402940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Have you tried DoubleTwist? (http://double-twist.com)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you tried DoubleTwist ?
( http : //double-twist.com )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you tried DoubleTwist?
(http://double-twist.com)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036326</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265394120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You should try Media Monkey. Media Monkey is a Music Library/Media Library that allows you to synch your music and movies to your iPod. I know that I use it to convert flac to MP3 but MM does recognize iPod hardware.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You should try Media Monkey .
Media Monkey is a Music Library/Media Library that allows you to synch your music and movies to your iPod .
I know that I use it to convert flac to MP3 but MM does recognize iPod hardware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should try Media Monkey.
Media Monkey is a Music Library/Media Library that allows you to synch your music and movies to your iPod.
I know that I use it to convert flac to MP3 but MM does recognize iPod hardware.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037142</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265397720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Hell, I was in the mall last week and overheard a group of teens making fun of Apple products as being for "queerfags".</p></div></blockquote><p>
I hope some burly leather boy with an iPod and Doc Martens beats the holy living crap out of those little pricks!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hell , I was in the mall last week and overheard a group of teens making fun of Apple products as being for " queerfags " .
I hope some burly leather boy with an iPod and Doc Martens beats the holy living crap out of those little pricks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hell, I was in the mall last week and overheard a group of teens making fun of Apple products as being for "queerfags".
I hope some burly leather boy with an iPod and Doc Martens beats the holy living crap out of those little pricks!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039506</id>
	<title>Apples Advantages</title>
	<author>Geert Jalink</author>
	<datestamp>1265364900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I see it as an advantage that Apple has control over applications being distributed to consumers, because of quality control. Hope that Apple will not get demonized for just telling a developer that certain things are not allowed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I see it as an advantage that Apple has control over applications being distributed to consumers , because of quality control .
Hope that Apple will not get demonized for just telling a developer that certain things are not allowed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see it as an advantage that Apple has control over applications being distributed to consumers, because of quality control.
Hope that Apple will not get demonized for just telling a developer that certain things are not allowed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036230</id>
	<title>No, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265393760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Does anybody think Barnes and Noble would be willing to post a sign saying your book was #38 in its category on Amazon?</p></div></blockquote><p>No, but then Barnes and Noble isn't the only place you can sell your book.  If you don't like their policies, you can also put it up for sale on Amazon, Books-A-Million, any number of local bookstores, and probably even stores like Wal-Mart, Target, etc.</p><p>On the other hand, Apple's app store is the <b>only</b> place to offer applications for iPhones, iTouches, and now iPads.  The author of this application can't simply go through some alternate means of distributing his application without asking people to jailbreak their device, something that is at best iffy to do if they want to maintain service.</p><p>If Apple would let developers put their apps up for download from their own web site or alternate app stores, then I wouldn't complain.  Apple has the right to accept, deny, or place any conditions on apps in its app store that they want.  However, that's only half the story.  My problem with their attitude is that they have set themselves up so that their store is the only store in town; they have a monopoly over distribution of i<i>Device</i> applications.  They have final authority over what I can and can't run on a device that I own, and as this story illustrates, they are grossly misusing that authority.</p><p>Personally, I can't understand why anyone would want to by an iPad, given that it is going to maintain this paradigm.  With phones, people are somewhat used to this.  With the iPad pushing into the netbook and ultraportable laptop market, though, it is completely unacceptable.  Imagine if you bought, for example, an HP laptop, and they told you the following: "Congratulations on your new HP laptop!  To obtain applications, visit apps.hp.com.  Oh, and we're sorry if it causes any inconvenience, but that is the only way you may install applications on this new laptop.  Everything else is blocked, and if we find out that you're trying to install apps from anywhere except hp.com, your laptop could be deactivated.  Congratulations again!"  Well, that's Apple, and it boggles my mind that anyone would tolerate it.</p><p>These shenanigans are precisely why I, as a developer, got a refund on my developer program application and told them that I will be not be developing for the iDevices.  It's also why I, who used to be an advocate for Apple devices, am strongly urging people to not buy their products these days.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anybody think Barnes and Noble would be willing to post a sign saying your book was # 38 in its category on Amazon ? No , but then Barnes and Noble is n't the only place you can sell your book .
If you do n't like their policies , you can also put it up for sale on Amazon , Books-A-Million , any number of local bookstores , and probably even stores like Wal-Mart , Target , etc.On the other hand , Apple 's app store is the only place to offer applications for iPhones , iTouches , and now iPads .
The author of this application ca n't simply go through some alternate means of distributing his application without asking people to jailbreak their device , something that is at best iffy to do if they want to maintain service.If Apple would let developers put their apps up for download from their own web site or alternate app stores , then I would n't complain .
Apple has the right to accept , deny , or place any conditions on apps in its app store that they want .
However , that 's only half the story .
My problem with their attitude is that they have set themselves up so that their store is the only store in town ; they have a monopoly over distribution of iDevice applications .
They have final authority over what I can and ca n't run on a device that I own , and as this story illustrates , they are grossly misusing that authority.Personally , I ca n't understand why anyone would want to by an iPad , given that it is going to maintain this paradigm .
With phones , people are somewhat used to this .
With the iPad pushing into the netbook and ultraportable laptop market , though , it is completely unacceptable .
Imagine if you bought , for example , an HP laptop , and they told you the following : " Congratulations on your new HP laptop !
To obtain applications , visit apps.hp.com .
Oh , and we 're sorry if it causes any inconvenience , but that is the only way you may install applications on this new laptop .
Everything else is blocked , and if we find out that you 're trying to install apps from anywhere except hp.com , your laptop could be deactivated .
Congratulations again !
" Well , that 's Apple , and it boggles my mind that anyone would tolerate it.These shenanigans are precisely why I , as a developer , got a refund on my developer program application and told them that I will be not be developing for the iDevices .
It 's also why I , who used to be an advocate for Apple devices , am strongly urging people to not buy their products these days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anybody think Barnes and Noble would be willing to post a sign saying your book was #38 in its category on Amazon?No, but then Barnes and Noble isn't the only place you can sell your book.
If you don't like their policies, you can also put it up for sale on Amazon, Books-A-Million, any number of local bookstores, and probably even stores like Wal-Mart, Target, etc.On the other hand, Apple's app store is the only place to offer applications for iPhones, iTouches, and now iPads.
The author of this application can't simply go through some alternate means of distributing his application without asking people to jailbreak their device, something that is at best iffy to do if they want to maintain service.If Apple would let developers put their apps up for download from their own web site or alternate app stores, then I wouldn't complain.
Apple has the right to accept, deny, or place any conditions on apps in its app store that they want.
However, that's only half the story.
My problem with their attitude is that they have set themselves up so that their store is the only store in town; they have a monopoly over distribution of iDevice applications.
They have final authority over what I can and can't run on a device that I own, and as this story illustrates, they are grossly misusing that authority.Personally, I can't understand why anyone would want to by an iPad, given that it is going to maintain this paradigm.
With phones, people are somewhat used to this.
With the iPad pushing into the netbook and ultraportable laptop market, though, it is completely unacceptable.
Imagine if you bought, for example, an HP laptop, and they told you the following: "Congratulations on your new HP laptop!
To obtain applications, visit apps.hp.com.
Oh, and we're sorry if it causes any inconvenience, but that is the only way you may install applications on this new laptop.
Everything else is blocked, and if we find out that you're trying to install apps from anywhere except hp.com, your laptop could be deactivated.
Congratulations again!
"  Well, that's Apple, and it boggles my mind that anyone would tolerate it.These shenanigans are precisely why I, as a developer, got a refund on my developer program application and told them that I will be not be developing for the iDevices.
It's also why I, who used to be an advocate for Apple devices, am strongly urging people to not buy their products these days.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31044150</id>
	<title>Re:Appstore model is broken</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265449920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I disagree. Many apps are rejected and there are quite a few apps on Cydia that should've been on the app store, but due to Apples policies they aren't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I disagree .
Many apps are rejected and there are quite a few apps on Cydia that should 've been on the app store , but due to Apples policies they are n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I disagree.
Many apps are rejected and there are quite a few apps on Cydia that should've been on the app store, but due to Apples policies they aren't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037382</id>
	<title>Re:Appstore model is broken</title>
	<author>dtml-try MyNick</author>
	<datestamp>1265398740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Purely as a user, what's not to like?</p></div><p>The idea that apple is trying it's hardest to keep quality developers away from the iphone os platform?</p><p>With such ridiculous and arbitrary rules I'm willing to bet there are a lot of serious companies and/or developers that would like to develop for the iphone but are afraid to invest the time and money because of the insane approval process.</p><p>I'm willing to bet that if apple would make the approval rules a lot more transparent and less strict we would see much more quality apps being developed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Purely as a user , what 's not to like ? The idea that apple is trying it 's hardest to keep quality developers away from the iphone os platform ? With such ridiculous and arbitrary rules I 'm willing to bet there are a lot of serious companies and/or developers that would like to develop for the iphone but are afraid to invest the time and money because of the insane approval process.I 'm willing to bet that if apple would make the approval rules a lot more transparent and less strict we would see much more quality apps being developed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Purely as a user, what's not to like?The idea that apple is trying it's hardest to keep quality developers away from the iphone os platform?With such ridiculous and arbitrary rules I'm willing to bet there are a lot of serious companies and/or developers that would like to develop for the iphone but are afraid to invest the time and money because of the insane approval process.I'm willing to bet that if apple would make the approval rules a lot more transparent and less strict we would see much more quality apps being developed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036634</id>
	<title>Lack of awareness of other platforms..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265395380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..is part of the experience their users want.</p><p>We used to call that the <em>Microsoft</em> experience, though.  Know how you can talk to a Microsoftie and they'll talk about all the problems as though they're just "normal" and that's just how computers (fail to) work?  iPhone users want to be like that.  Can't multitask?  That's normal!  Need to get approval from the platform's creator?  That's normal!  Isn't everything like that?  Yes, everything is like that, as long as you control what "everything" means.  "Everything" means all Apple handhelds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..is part of the experience their users want.We used to call that the Microsoft experience , though .
Know how you can talk to a Microsoftie and they 'll talk about all the problems as though they 're just " normal " and that 's just how computers ( fail to ) work ?
iPhone users want to be like that .
Ca n't multitask ?
That 's normal !
Need to get approval from the platform 's creator ?
That 's normal !
Is n't everything like that ?
Yes , everything is like that , as long as you control what " everything " means .
" Everything " means all Apple handhelds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..is part of the experience their users want.We used to call that the Microsoft experience, though.
Know how you can talk to a Microsoftie and they'll talk about all the problems as though they're just "normal" and that's just how computers (fail to) work?
iPhone users want to be like that.
Can't multitask?
That's normal!
Need to get approval from the platform's creator?
That's normal!
Isn't everything like that?
Yes, everything is like that, as long as you control what "everything" means.
"Everything" means all Apple handhelds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035880</id>
	<title>Makes sense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265392380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple can't have Android inside Steve Jobs' Reality Distortion Field.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple ca n't have Android inside Steve Jobs ' Reality Distortion Field .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple can't have Android inside Steve Jobs' Reality Distortion Field.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036240</id>
	<title>Re:When is this ever false?</title>
	<author>RPoet</author>
	<datestamp>1265393820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably." -- Judge Aaron Satie</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" With the first link , the chain is forged .
The first speech censored , the first thought forbidden , the first freedom denied , chains us all irrevocably .
" -- Judge Aaron Satie</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"With the first link, the chain is forged.
The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably.
" -- Judge Aaron Satie</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037252</id>
	<title>Did *anyone* actually RTFA?</title>
	<author>jrothwell97</author>
	<datestamp>1265398140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>True, the App Store model is monopolistic and overall has rather nasty side effects, but the rejected description stated that the app had been a finalist in Android's developer challenge.</p><p> <strong>This information was simply irrelevant</strong>, because the Android app is a completely different beast to the iPhone OS one. It's like Microsoft advertising Office 2007 by saying that Office 5.1a for the Mac won an award, somewhere. True, it was probably inadvertent, but if I was browsing the synaptic repositories and came across the Skype package, I wouldn't want to know about how well it runs on AmigaOS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>True , the App Store model is monopolistic and overall has rather nasty side effects , but the rejected description stated that the app had been a finalist in Android 's developer challenge .
This information was simply irrelevant , because the Android app is a completely different beast to the iPhone OS one .
It 's like Microsoft advertising Office 2007 by saying that Office 5.1a for the Mac won an award , somewhere .
True , it was probably inadvertent , but if I was browsing the synaptic repositories and came across the Skype package , I would n't want to know about how well it runs on AmigaOS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>True, the App Store model is monopolistic and overall has rather nasty side effects, but the rejected description stated that the app had been a finalist in Android's developer challenge.
This information was simply irrelevant, because the Android app is a completely different beast to the iPhone OS one.
It's like Microsoft advertising Office 2007 by saying that Office 5.1a for the Mac won an award, somewhere.
True, it was probably inadvertent, but if I was browsing the synaptic repositories and came across the Skype package, I wouldn't want to know about how well it runs on AmigaOS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036450</id>
	<title>What flavor is Steve's Koolaid?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265394660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is amazing how Apple Koolaid drinkers will spin and twist events to absolve Apple of any wrongdoing 99\% of the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is amazing how Apple Koolaid drinkers will spin and twist events to absolve Apple of any wrongdoing 99 \ % of the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is amazing how Apple Koolaid drinkers will spin and twist events to absolve Apple of any wrongdoing 99\% of the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035948</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035820</id>
	<title>AppStoreRejections.slashdot.org</title>
	<author>LostCluster</author>
	<datestamp>1265392140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Rejections for losers. Stuff that doesn't matter.</p><p>Could we have a new slashdot section for this so I can filter out this crap?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rejections for losers .
Stuff that does n't matter.Could we have a new slashdot section for this so I can filter out this crap ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rejections for losers.
Stuff that doesn't matter.Could we have a new slashdot section for this so I can filter out this crap?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037576</id>
	<title>Re:Remember a time..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265399700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm no fan of Apple, and I own a Droid Eris... but... what they are doing is not 'anti-competitive'. It's actually competitive.</p><p>People shouldn't get their panties in a bunch because a company who hosts an application distribution platform (Apple) does not like mention of their competitors (Android). It should be expected. Apple's system was never open, and people should not expect it to open up just because they were offended. If you don't like the proprietary nature of Apple, perhaps you should just avoid buying their products (like I did) but more regulation and government involvement is NOT the answer.</p><p>When the government get's involved it tends to establish monopolies, not break them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm no fan of Apple , and I own a Droid Eris... but... what they are doing is not 'anti-competitive' .
It 's actually competitive.People should n't get their panties in a bunch because a company who hosts an application distribution platform ( Apple ) does not like mention of their competitors ( Android ) .
It should be expected .
Apple 's system was never open , and people should not expect it to open up just because they were offended .
If you do n't like the proprietary nature of Apple , perhaps you should just avoid buying their products ( like I did ) but more regulation and government involvement is NOT the answer.When the government get 's involved it tends to establish monopolies , not break them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm no fan of Apple, and I own a Droid Eris... but... what they are doing is not 'anti-competitive'.
It's actually competitive.People shouldn't get their panties in a bunch because a company who hosts an application distribution platform (Apple) does not like mention of their competitors (Android).
It should be expected.
Apple's system was never open, and people should not expect it to open up just because they were offended.
If you don't like the proprietary nature of Apple, perhaps you should just avoid buying their products (like I did) but more regulation and government involvement is NOT the answer.When the government get's involved it tends to establish monopolies, not break them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035720</id>
	<title>We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>SQLz</author>
	<datestamp>1265391840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow the list of magical things you can't do with your iPhone app sure is growing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow the list of magical things you ca n't do with your iPhone app sure is growing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow the list of magical things you can't do with your iPhone app sure is growing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037174</id>
	<title>I'm backing Android here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265397840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple has really screwed too many developers.  No Flash, No Silverlight (yeah it's flamebait but it comes down to being open / closed) and now this.  What do they think developers will do?  Their laptops sold because the alpha developers bought into the fact that MacBooks were at one time the best laptop. This is no more as Ubuntu 10 drives new graphics innovation and now Google's android platform will be completely open.</p><p>Long live freedom  Screw Apple!</p><p>Darth Null<br>'my force was not properly instantiated"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple has really screwed too many developers .
No Flash , No Silverlight ( yeah it 's flamebait but it comes down to being open / closed ) and now this .
What do they think developers will do ?
Their laptops sold because the alpha developers bought into the fact that MacBooks were at one time the best laptop .
This is no more as Ubuntu 10 drives new graphics innovation and now Google 's android platform will be completely open.Long live freedom Screw Apple ! Darth Null'my force was not properly instantiated "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple has really screwed too many developers.
No Flash, No Silverlight (yeah it's flamebait but it comes down to being open / closed) and now this.
What do they think developers will do?
Their laptops sold because the alpha developers bought into the fact that MacBooks were at one time the best laptop.
This is no more as Ubuntu 10 drives new graphics innovation and now Google's android platform will be completely open.Long live freedom  Screw Apple!Darth Null'my force was not properly instantiated"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037954</id>
	<title>Too closed for me</title>
	<author>El Fantasmo</author>
	<datestamp>1265401440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Imagine how popular Intel motherboards would be if you had to specially write programs for them without mentioning brand interoperability or non Intel accolades.  e.g.: Intel "We'd appreciate it if you'd not mention you program works on AMD chips or we'll hurt you financially."  Oh wait...

Another thing, given this, how come Apple lets Mac format software get sold on the same disk or in the same package as Windows and/or Linux software?  Why don't I have to go through itunes to get it?

I hope Apple loosens up a bit or goes the way of soldered ram...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine how popular Intel motherboards would be if you had to specially write programs for them without mentioning brand interoperability or non Intel accolades .
e.g. : Intel " We 'd appreciate it if you 'd not mention you program works on AMD chips or we 'll hurt you financially .
" Oh wait.. . Another thing , given this , how come Apple lets Mac format software get sold on the same disk or in the same package as Windows and/or Linux software ?
Why do n't I have to go through itunes to get it ?
I hope Apple loosens up a bit or goes the way of soldered ram.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine how popular Intel motherboards would be if you had to specially write programs for them without mentioning brand interoperability or non Intel accolades.
e.g.: Intel "We'd appreciate it if you'd not mention you program works on AMD chips or we'll hurt you financially.
"  Oh wait...

Another thing, given this, how come Apple lets Mac format software get sold on the same disk or in the same package as Windows and/or Linux software?
Why don't I have to go through itunes to get it?
I hope Apple loosens up a bit or goes the way of soldered ram...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035844</id>
	<title>It's my app store, and I'll censor if I want to...</title>
	<author>Trip6</author>
	<datestamp>1265392200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple is certainly clear on what they want control over.  Flash on the iPhone anyone?  NOT!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple is certainly clear on what they want control over .
Flash on the iPhone anyone ?
NOT !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple is certainly clear on what they want control over.
Flash on the iPhone anyone?
NOT!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036470</id>
	<title>Old and new wordings in app description</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265394720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <b>Old wording:</b> Finalist in Google's Android Developer's Challenge!

</p><p> <b>New wording:</b> Finalist in Large Internet Search Company's Human-Looking Robot Developer's Challenge!

</p><p>At least he was able to preserve the basic meaning in the reworded version.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Old wording : Finalist in Google 's Android Developer 's Challenge !
New wording : Finalist in Large Internet Search Company 's Human-Looking Robot Developer 's Challenge !
At least he was able to preserve the basic meaning in the reworded version .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Old wording: Finalist in Google's Android Developer's Challenge!
New wording: Finalist in Large Internet Search Company's Human-Looking Robot Developer's Challenge!
At least he was able to preserve the basic meaning in the reworded version.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037118</id>
	<title>Apple has issues</title>
	<author>Ukab the Great</author>
	<datestamp>1265397660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>with Apps involving sex, Hitler's Mein Kampf, and Android.</p><p>So much for my dream of making a game where you fight Nazi hooker androids.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>with Apps involving sex , Hitler 's Mein Kampf , and Android.So much for my dream of making a game where you fight Nazi hooker androids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>with Apps involving sex, Hitler's Mein Kampf, and Android.So much for my dream of making a game where you fight Nazi hooker androids.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31041040</id>
	<title>Re:Remember a time.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265372760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>tks you ellerne saglk hocam</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>tks you ellerne saglk hocam</tokentext>
<sentencetext>tks you ellerne saglk hocam</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036194</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265393640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't worry, any company that has tried to introduce artificial limitations like this always ends up defunct soon enough. Apple is just lasting longer than most.</p><p>It'll probably start with the developers. They'll get sick and tired of paying $99 a year just to develop goddamn cell phone apps. They'll get sick and tired of Apple's unnecessary censorship and app publication restrictions. They'll move to more open platforms.</p><p>It'll continue with the users. Those, such as yourself, who buy Apple products expecting a useful product will become dismayed, never buy another Apple product, and will suggest to other people that they also avoid Apple.</p><p>Eventually, the near-religious Apple fanatics will lose interest. Their market is basically made up of those born between 1980 and 1995, the so-called "Hipster" generation. In a few short years, we'll see these people grow up, having faced real-world financial pressure since leaving college. They'll have kids, and won't have money for over-priced Apple designer products.</p><p>The next generation, those born after 1995, don't give a fuck about Apple and their products. Hell, I was in the mall last week and overheard a group of teens making fun of Apple products as being for "queerfags". Five years ago, these are the sort of teens who'd be going fucking crazy for iPods.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry , any company that has tried to introduce artificial limitations like this always ends up defunct soon enough .
Apple is just lasting longer than most.It 'll probably start with the developers .
They 'll get sick and tired of paying $ 99 a year just to develop goddamn cell phone apps .
They 'll get sick and tired of Apple 's unnecessary censorship and app publication restrictions .
They 'll move to more open platforms.It 'll continue with the users .
Those , such as yourself , who buy Apple products expecting a useful product will become dismayed , never buy another Apple product , and will suggest to other people that they also avoid Apple.Eventually , the near-religious Apple fanatics will lose interest .
Their market is basically made up of those born between 1980 and 1995 , the so-called " Hipster " generation .
In a few short years , we 'll see these people grow up , having faced real-world financial pressure since leaving college .
They 'll have kids , and wo n't have money for over-priced Apple designer products.The next generation , those born after 1995 , do n't give a fuck about Apple and their products .
Hell , I was in the mall last week and overheard a group of teens making fun of Apple products as being for " queerfags " .
Five years ago , these are the sort of teens who 'd be going fucking crazy for iPods .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry, any company that has tried to introduce artificial limitations like this always ends up defunct soon enough.
Apple is just lasting longer than most.It'll probably start with the developers.
They'll get sick and tired of paying $99 a year just to develop goddamn cell phone apps.
They'll get sick and tired of Apple's unnecessary censorship and app publication restrictions.
They'll move to more open platforms.It'll continue with the users.
Those, such as yourself, who buy Apple products expecting a useful product will become dismayed, never buy another Apple product, and will suggest to other people that they also avoid Apple.Eventually, the near-religious Apple fanatics will lose interest.
Their market is basically made up of those born between 1980 and 1995, the so-called "Hipster" generation.
In a few short years, we'll see these people grow up, having faced real-world financial pressure since leaving college.
They'll have kids, and won't have money for over-priced Apple designer products.The next generation, those born after 1995, don't give a fuck about Apple and their products.
Hell, I was in the mall last week and overheard a group of teens making fun of Apple products as being for "queerfags".
Five years ago, these are the sort of teens who'd be going fucking crazy for iPods.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037800</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>SoupIsGoodFood\_42</author>
	<datestamp>1265400900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Why, oh why, won't Apple let me push music to it like every other, non-Apple, media player that we own?</i></p><p>Because most people don't want to do it that way and Apple doesn't want to spend the extra time supporting a feature that only a few nerds are going to use.</p><p>iTunes works fine for me, BTW.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why , oh why , wo n't Apple let me push music to it like every other , non-Apple , media player that we own ? Because most people do n't want to do it that way and Apple does n't want to spend the extra time supporting a feature that only a few nerds are going to use.iTunes works fine for me , BTW .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why, oh why, won't Apple let me push music to it like every other, non-Apple, media player that we own?Because most people don't want to do it that way and Apple doesn't want to spend the extra time supporting a feature that only a few nerds are going to use.iTunes works fine for me, BTW.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036308</id>
	<title>Re:Flash of stupidity...</title>
	<author>rickb928</author>
	<datestamp>1265394060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The flash of supidity is thinking visitors to the iPhone App Store have any significant interest in Android apps.</p><p>Unless they also have an Android phone, in which case they are going over to the Market for those apps.</p><p>More Apple paintywaists, and more=less.  Not a real big deal, but I wonder how Apple would react to a developer who mentioned their app was a finalist for a Nokia or Microsoft competition.</p><p>And the dev has a sense of humor.  So they don't seem to need the mentions to achieve their goals.  Good for them.</p><p>Apple can bite ME.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The flash of supidity is thinking visitors to the iPhone App Store have any significant interest in Android apps.Unless they also have an Android phone , in which case they are going over to the Market for those apps.More Apple paintywaists , and more = less .
Not a real big deal , but I wonder how Apple would react to a developer who mentioned their app was a finalist for a Nokia or Microsoft competition.And the dev has a sense of humor .
So they do n't seem to need the mentions to achieve their goals .
Good for them.Apple can bite ME .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The flash of supidity is thinking visitors to the iPhone App Store have any significant interest in Android apps.Unless they also have an Android phone, in which case they are going over to the Market for those apps.More Apple paintywaists, and more=less.
Not a real big deal, but I wonder how Apple would react to a developer who mentioned their app was a finalist for a Nokia or Microsoft competition.And the dev has a sense of humor.
So they don't seem to need the mentions to achieve their goals.
Good for them.Apple can bite ME.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31041300</id>
	<title>Re:Flash of stupidity...</title>
	<author>pigphish</author>
	<datestamp>1265374500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Steve Jobs is so lucky to have so many sheep like you, I mean users.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Steve Jobs is so lucky to have so many sheep like you , I mean users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Steve Jobs is so lucky to have so many sheep like you, I mean users.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038682</id>
	<title>Re:David or Goliath, Which One Today?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265361120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Apple's desire to have Windows applications running on OSX [apple.com]</p></div> </blockquote><p>Except<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... the link<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... is to run Windows on your Mac, not Windows apps in Mac OS X.</p><blockquote><div><p>You push the little guys around [wikipedia.org] when you're the big man on campus</p></div> </blockquote><p>So in 4 years, they've come from no device on the market, to essentially owning the market<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...  They couldn't have used their 'monopoly' to do it since they couldn't have had one being the new comer.  Maybe they actually have a better product or maybe they don't, but they have a marketing system that actually gets customers the info that makes them buy a product.</p><p>Either way, I'm fairly sure that Apple is far better selling products than Google, the guy who submitted the story, and yourself.  It might be time to pay attention and figure out WHY they are kicking the shit out of everyone else rather than sit around and whine about it while making up bullshit excuses for the most trivial problems you can find.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple 's desire to have Windows applications running on OSX [ apple.com ] Except ... the link ... is to run Windows on your Mac , not Windows apps in Mac OS X.You push the little guys around [ wikipedia.org ] when you 're the big man on campus So in 4 years , they 've come from no device on the market , to essentially owning the market ... They could n't have used their 'monopoly ' to do it since they could n't have had one being the new comer .
Maybe they actually have a better product or maybe they do n't , but they have a marketing system that actually gets customers the info that makes them buy a product.Either way , I 'm fairly sure that Apple is far better selling products than Google , the guy who submitted the story , and yourself .
It might be time to pay attention and figure out WHY they are kicking the shit out of everyone else rather than sit around and whine about it while making up bullshit excuses for the most trivial problems you can find .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple's desire to have Windows applications running on OSX [apple.com] Except ... the link ... is to run Windows on your Mac, not Windows apps in Mac OS X.You push the little guys around [wikipedia.org] when you're the big man on campus So in 4 years, they've come from no device on the market, to essentially owning the market ...  They couldn't have used their 'monopoly' to do it since they couldn't have had one being the new comer.
Maybe they actually have a better product or maybe they don't, but they have a marketing system that actually gets customers the info that makes them buy a product.Either way, I'm fairly sure that Apple is far better selling products than Google, the guy who submitted the story, and yourself.
It might be time to pay attention and figure out WHY they are kicking the shit out of everyone else rather than sit around and whine about it while making up bullshit excuses for the most trivial problems you can find.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040462</id>
	<title>Good to know I was right...</title>
	<author>AlgorithMan</author>
	<datestamp>1265369220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I like Apples products somehow - OS-X is a decent Unix and has many of the strengths of Linux. They are pretty and have some impressive features (like timemachine)<br> <br>

still I never bought any of their products, because I always thought that they'd just become the next Microsoft (or the third IBM if you want), if they become big enough in a market... and here we are - Apple suppressing competition...<br> <br>

I should buy a crystal ball or so...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I like Apples products somehow - OS-X is a decent Unix and has many of the strengths of Linux .
They are pretty and have some impressive features ( like timemachine ) still I never bought any of their products , because I always thought that they 'd just become the next Microsoft ( or the third IBM if you want ) , if they become big enough in a market... and here we are - Apple suppressing competition.. . I should buy a crystal ball or so.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like Apples products somehow - OS-X is a decent Unix and has many of the strengths of Linux.
They are pretty and have some impressive features (like timemachine) 

still I never bought any of their products, because I always thought that they'd just become the next Microsoft (or the third IBM if you want), if they become big enough in a market... and here we are - Apple suppressing competition... 

I should buy a crystal ball or so...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038150</id>
	<title>Re:Android</title>
	<author>strength\_of\_10\_men</author>
	<datestamp>1265402160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(Steve Jobs waves his hands) Android isn't the word you're looking for.
</p><p>(Developer)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... These aren't the words I'm looking for.
</p><p>(Steve Jobs) You can go about your business.
</p><p>(Developer)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I'll go about my business.</p><p>(Steve Jobs) Move along.
</p><p>(Developer)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I'll move along</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( Steve Jobs waves his hands ) Android is n't the word you 're looking for .
( Developer ) ... These are n't the words I 'm looking for .
( Steve Jobs ) You can go about your business .
( Developer ) ... I 'll go about my business .
( Steve Jobs ) Move along .
( Developer ) ... I 'll move along</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(Steve Jobs waves his hands) Android isn't the word you're looking for.
(Developer) ... These aren't the words I'm looking for.
(Steve Jobs) You can go about your business.
(Developer) ... I'll go about my business.
(Steve Jobs) Move along.
(Developer) ... I'll move along</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035712</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035886</id>
	<title>Re:Flash of stupidity...</title>
	<author>OverlordQ</author>
	<datestamp>1265392380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Does anybody think Barnes and Noble would be willing to post a sign saying your book was #38 in its category on Amazon? </i></p><p>Yes?</p><p>"Hey they book got good reviews, it must be good, let me buy it."</p><p>Impulse purchasing ftw.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anybody think Barnes and Noble would be willing to post a sign saying your book was # 38 in its category on Amazon ?
Yes ? " Hey they book got good reviews , it must be good , let me buy it .
" Impulse purchasing ftw .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anybody think Barnes and Noble would be willing to post a sign saying your book was #38 in its category on Amazon?
Yes?"Hey they book got good reviews, it must be good, let me buy it.
"Impulse purchasing ftw.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035872</id>
	<title>Makes Sense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265392320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>While I'm sure many will eagerly jump forward to proclaim, yet again, how evil Apple has become, to me, this just makes sense. Mentioning that the app was a finalist in Google's Android Developer's Challenge implies that the app is compatible with an Android system. Even if one moron downloads it thinking that it will work on their Andriod phone, it's one person too many. Makes sense to me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While I 'm sure many will eagerly jump forward to proclaim , yet again , how evil Apple has become , to me , this just makes sense .
Mentioning that the app was a finalist in Google 's Android Developer 's Challenge implies that the app is compatible with an Android system .
Even if one moron downloads it thinking that it will work on their Andriod phone , it 's one person too many .
Makes sense to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I'm sure many will eagerly jump forward to proclaim, yet again, how evil Apple has become, to me, this just makes sense.
Mentioning that the app was a finalist in Google's Android Developer's Challenge implies that the app is compatible with an Android system.
Even if one moron downloads it thinking that it will work on their Andriod phone, it's one person too many.
Makes sense to me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036788</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265396100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's like saying getting kicked in the stomach isn't as bad as getting kicked in the balls.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's like saying getting kicked in the stomach is n't as bad as getting kicked in the balls .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's like saying getting kicked in the stomach isn't as bad as getting kicked in the balls.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037478</id>
	<title>Re:The wording of Apple's reply</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265399100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I doesn't seem like Apple was going to remove the currently available version of their app, since it didn't contain any reference to Android.  This would just be a delay of the update being available.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I does n't seem like Apple was going to remove the currently available version of their app , since it did n't contain any reference to Android .
This would just be a delay of the update being available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doesn't seem like Apple was going to remove the currently available version of their app, since it didn't contain any reference to Android.
This would just be a delay of the update being available.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036050</id>
	<title>New app submission</title>
	<author>ArhcAngel</author>
	<datestamp>1265392920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how a game where an archer (who just happens to look like a certain Android) shoots an Apple (that just happens to have a bite taken out of it) off of it's pedestal would be received? Hrmmmm...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how a game where an archer ( who just happens to look like a certain Android ) shoots an Apple ( that just happens to have a bite taken out of it ) off of it 's pedestal would be received ?
Hrmmmm.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how a game where an archer (who just happens to look like a certain Android) shoots an Apple (that just happens to have a bite taken out of it) off of it's pedestal would be received?
Hrmmmm...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035974</id>
	<title>Advertising... or not?</title>
	<author>Mark19960</author>
	<datestamp>1265392680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't see this guy mentioning that his application was a finalist in a developer challenge as such.<br>If anything it makes it stand out...</p><p>Gee, how did Apple find out in the sea of 5,000 applications that turn your phone into a flashlight?<br>They probably search for 'android' and snuff the mention of it out.</p><p>It is their store.... they can do what they want and for that reason I don't buy from it.<br>I have seen tons of apps on the android store that mention iPhone or the fact that the same application was written for it.<br>We don't see Google snuffing those out....<br>This Apple has worms in it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see this guy mentioning that his application was a finalist in a developer challenge as such.If anything it makes it stand out...Gee , how did Apple find out in the sea of 5,000 applications that turn your phone into a flashlight ? They probably search for 'android ' and snuff the mention of it out.It is their store.... they can do what they want and for that reason I do n't buy from it.I have seen tons of apps on the android store that mention iPhone or the fact that the same application was written for it.We do n't see Google snuffing those out....This Apple has worms in it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see this guy mentioning that his application was a finalist in a developer challenge as such.If anything it makes it stand out...Gee, how did Apple find out in the sea of 5,000 applications that turn your phone into a flashlight?They probably search for 'android' and snuff the mention of it out.It is their store.... they can do what they want and for that reason I don't buy from it.I have seen tons of apps on the android store that mention iPhone or the fact that the same application was written for it.We don't see Google snuffing those out....This Apple has worms in it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31044850</id>
	<title>Re:When is this ever false?</title>
	<author>nugneant</author>
	<datestamp>1265461980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's within my "rights" to call you a simpering faggot with a Napolean complex, but that doesn't necessarily make doing so the right (and/or moral) thing to do.<br> <br>
Maybe you should quit jerking off over these purely semantic notions you seem to have acquired, pull your head out of your ass, take a good long look around you, and form a spontaneous conclusion or two, based not upon "given Deeply Held Value <i>x</i> and stimulus of situation <i>y</i> ergo <i>z</i>", but rather "situation <i>y</i> is bullshit, pure and simple, ergo <i>it is wrong</i>, and if Deeply Held Value <i>x</i> contradicts this basic notion, then Deeply Held Value <i>x</i> must itself be <i>less than fully correct</i>, full-stop, end of sentence, end of chapter".</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's within my " rights " to call you a simpering faggot with a Napolean complex , but that does n't necessarily make doing so the right ( and/or moral ) thing to do .
Maybe you should quit jerking off over these purely semantic notions you seem to have acquired , pull your head out of your ass , take a good long look around you , and form a spontaneous conclusion or two , based not upon " given Deeply Held Value x and stimulus of situation y ergo z " , but rather " situation y is bullshit , pure and simple , ergo it is wrong , and if Deeply Held Value x contradicts this basic notion , then Deeply Held Value x must itself be less than fully correct , full-stop , end of sentence , end of chapter " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's within my "rights" to call you a simpering faggot with a Napolean complex, but that doesn't necessarily make doing so the right (and/or moral) thing to do.
Maybe you should quit jerking off over these purely semantic notions you seem to have acquired, pull your head out of your ass, take a good long look around you, and form a spontaneous conclusion or two, based not upon "given Deeply Held Value x and stimulus of situation y ergo z", but rather "situation y is bullshit, pure and simple, ergo it is wrong, and if Deeply Held Value x contradicts this basic notion, then Deeply Held Value x must itself be less than fully correct, full-stop, end of sentence, end of chapter".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035712</id>
	<title>Android</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265391780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's not an app for that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's not an app for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's not an app for that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036712</id>
	<title>Re:Objectively speaking...</title>
	<author>Mongoose Disciple</author>
	<datestamp>1265395740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Why is Apple demonized for not willing to subsidize their competitors advertising?</i></p><p>See, I read this the opposite way.</p><p>It's easy for Apple to point at this and say:  "The iPhone is so big/successful/important that the award-winning apps for other platforms inevitably end up ported to the iPhone.  The iPhone gives you all these great iPhone-exclusive apps, AND all the best apps from any other platform!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is Apple demonized for not willing to subsidize their competitors advertising ? See , I read this the opposite way.It 's easy for Apple to point at this and say : " The iPhone is so big/successful/important that the award-winning apps for other platforms inevitably end up ported to the iPhone .
The iPhone gives you all these great iPhone-exclusive apps , AND all the best apps from any other platform !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is Apple demonized for not willing to subsidize their competitors advertising?See, I read this the opposite way.It's easy for Apple to point at this and say:  "The iPhone is so big/successful/important that the award-winning apps for other platforms inevitably end up ported to the iPhone.
The iPhone gives you all these great iPhone-exclusive apps, AND all the best apps from any other platform!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037878</id>
	<title>Re:The wording of Apple's reply</title>
	<author>Have Blue</author>
	<datestamp>1265401140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is a vast improvement over the old policy of any hiccup in your approval instantly pushing you to the back of the month-long line.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a vast improvement over the old policy of any hiccup in your approval instantly pushing you to the back of the month-long line .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a vast improvement over the old policy of any hiccup in your approval instantly pushing you to the back of the month-long line.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039036</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>Deosyne</author>
	<datestamp>1265362800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For iTunes, it's letting him off easy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For iTunes , it 's letting him off easy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For iTunes, it's letting him off easy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038300</id>
	<title>Annoying</title>
	<author>jweller13</author>
	<datestamp>1265402760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I love my ipod but when Apple does things like this, which it seems they do every other month, it really chaps my ass.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I love my ipod but when Apple does things like this , which it seems they do every other month , it really chaps my ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love my ipod but when Apple does things like this, which it seems they do every other month, it really chaps my ass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036952</id>
	<title>Lim (Apple - Microsoft) = 1</title>
	<author>waTR</author>
	<datestamp>1265396820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have been an apple user and STRONG proponent since the 6400 days. Though, these days I am no longer a proponent, simply a happy user of the hardware I purchased previously. However, even this is changing, as with every update to the OS, more and more of the sky is being blocked out with the OS becoming more and more closed. This seems like a direct attack at the heart of *nix, which has been the poster-child of openness (Linux/BSD). Microsoft is already on life-support, but the family is selfish and unwilling to let go, and simply pull the plug. Apple seems to be racing with great zeal for the same fate.</p><p>The way apple has been making their system more and more closed (ever since they closed-sourced the OSX kernel), has been a steady decline into a place where apple will no longer be the "Alternative".</p><p>It seems they are terrified of the prospect of losing their main revenue stream: hardware. However, they changed their business model ever since the old iMac (colored) came out. Where they are no longer just hardware, they are a user experience. On the other hand, they still seem to be terrified of the prospect of a repeat of what happened in the early 90s when they opened their hardware to other non-apple producers and almost went out of business due to cheaper supply of apple hardware from non-apple producers. Sadly, they don't want to accept the new business model as being a solution to this problem. It seems as though they have one leg in the past and one racing for the future. If they don't be careful, this may rip their company apart.</p><p>To Apple:<br>Openness != lower profits. However, openness is the future, I think this is an established business reality at this point. Stop waging war on this, you will lose, and we the people WILL win in the end. So while you may win a few battles with release of some neat things (iPad), you will lose the war, because those you depend on most dearly will abandon you...and they are not the consumer, as you may think... this will begin with the fall of your King. Who has lost his path, perhaps even led astray by those advisors he trusts most. Because they know he is short on time. They know there will be strife. So they are trying to shut all the exits from the outside, so those inside will have no way out. The momentum in the wrong direction is so great at this point, that sadly, there is very little chance the company will be able to stear clear of the rocks ahead.</p><p>"Here lays the broken spirit of Apple - April 1, 1976 - January 27, 201X"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have been an apple user and STRONG proponent since the 6400 days .
Though , these days I am no longer a proponent , simply a happy user of the hardware I purchased previously .
However , even this is changing , as with every update to the OS , more and more of the sky is being blocked out with the OS becoming more and more closed .
This seems like a direct attack at the heart of * nix , which has been the poster-child of openness ( Linux/BSD ) .
Microsoft is already on life-support , but the family is selfish and unwilling to let go , and simply pull the plug .
Apple seems to be racing with great zeal for the same fate.The way apple has been making their system more and more closed ( ever since they closed-sourced the OSX kernel ) , has been a steady decline into a place where apple will no longer be the " Alternative " .It seems they are terrified of the prospect of losing their main revenue stream : hardware .
However , they changed their business model ever since the old iMac ( colored ) came out .
Where they are no longer just hardware , they are a user experience .
On the other hand , they still seem to be terrified of the prospect of a repeat of what happened in the early 90s when they opened their hardware to other non-apple producers and almost went out of business due to cheaper supply of apple hardware from non-apple producers .
Sadly , they do n't want to accept the new business model as being a solution to this problem .
It seems as though they have one leg in the past and one racing for the future .
If they do n't be careful , this may rip their company apart.To Apple : Openness ! = lower profits .
However , openness is the future , I think this is an established business reality at this point .
Stop waging war on this , you will lose , and we the people WILL win in the end .
So while you may win a few battles with release of some neat things ( iPad ) , you will lose the war , because those you depend on most dearly will abandon you...and they are not the consumer , as you may think... this will begin with the fall of your King .
Who has lost his path , perhaps even led astray by those advisors he trusts most .
Because they know he is short on time .
They know there will be strife .
So they are trying to shut all the exits from the outside , so those inside will have no way out .
The momentum in the wrong direction is so great at this point , that sadly , there is very little chance the company will be able to stear clear of the rocks ahead .
" Here lays the broken spirit of Apple - April 1 , 1976 - January 27 , 201X "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have been an apple user and STRONG proponent since the 6400 days.
Though, these days I am no longer a proponent, simply a happy user of the hardware I purchased previously.
However, even this is changing, as with every update to the OS, more and more of the sky is being blocked out with the OS becoming more and more closed.
This seems like a direct attack at the heart of *nix, which has been the poster-child of openness (Linux/BSD).
Microsoft is already on life-support, but the family is selfish and unwilling to let go, and simply pull the plug.
Apple seems to be racing with great zeal for the same fate.The way apple has been making their system more and more closed (ever since they closed-sourced the OSX kernel), has been a steady decline into a place where apple will no longer be the "Alternative".It seems they are terrified of the prospect of losing their main revenue stream: hardware.
However, they changed their business model ever since the old iMac (colored) came out.
Where they are no longer just hardware, they are a user experience.
On the other hand, they still seem to be terrified of the prospect of a repeat of what happened in the early 90s when they opened their hardware to other non-apple producers and almost went out of business due to cheaper supply of apple hardware from non-apple producers.
Sadly, they don't want to accept the new business model as being a solution to this problem.
It seems as though they have one leg in the past and one racing for the future.
If they don't be careful, this may rip their company apart.To Apple:Openness != lower profits.
However, openness is the future, I think this is an established business reality at this point.
Stop waging war on this, you will lose, and we the people WILL win in the end.
So while you may win a few battles with release of some neat things (iPad), you will lose the war, because those you depend on most dearly will abandon you...and they are not the consumer, as you may think... this will begin with the fall of your King.
Who has lost his path, perhaps even led astray by those advisors he trusts most.
Because they know he is short on time.
They know there will be strife.
So they are trying to shut all the exits from the outside, so those inside will have no way out.
The momentum in the wrong direction is so great at this point, that sadly, there is very little chance the company will be able to stear clear of the rocks ahead.
"Here lays the broken spirit of Apple - April 1, 1976 - January 27, 201X"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036250</id>
	<title>Not supprised</title>
	<author>bobwrit</author>
	<datestamp>1265393880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not surprised by this. Apple is well known for censorship/DRM.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not surprised by this .
Apple is well known for censorship/DRM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not surprised by this.
Apple is well known for censorship/DRM.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036392</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265394420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They'll get sick and tired of paying $99 a year just to develop goddamn cell phone apps.</p></div><p>Except 99 dollars for most programmers is maybe 3-4 hours of pay.  I think you significantly overestimate this as other costs will far eclipse it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll get sick and tired of paying $ 99 a year just to develop goddamn cell phone apps.Except 99 dollars for most programmers is maybe 3-4 hours of pay .
I think you significantly overestimate this as other costs will far eclipse it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll get sick and tired of paying $99 a year just to develop goddamn cell phone apps.Except 99 dollars for most programmers is maybe 3-4 hours of pay.
I think you significantly overestimate this as other costs will far eclipse it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036678</id>
	<title>If this was a Walmart store....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265395560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do any of you haters think that Walmart would let one of their suppliers mention "Target" or "Kmart" on signage in their store?  I see absolutely nothing wrong with this.  It's Apple's store.  You play by their rules.</p><p>Apple has managed to help mobile developers make 4.6 BILLION dollars in the last year... That's about 4.5 billion dollars more than the industry made in the prior year.  Complain all you want.  What they're doing is working and working beyond anybodies wildest expectations... That is presuming that we define "working" as "making developers money so they can develop more great software".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do any of you haters think that Walmart would let one of their suppliers mention " Target " or " Kmart " on signage in their store ?
I see absolutely nothing wrong with this .
It 's Apple 's store .
You play by their rules.Apple has managed to help mobile developers make 4.6 BILLION dollars in the last year... That 's about 4.5 billion dollars more than the industry made in the prior year .
Complain all you want .
What they 're doing is working and working beyond anybodies wildest expectations... That is presuming that we define " working " as " making developers money so they can develop more great software " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do any of you haters think that Walmart would let one of their suppliers mention "Target" or "Kmart" on signage in their store?
I see absolutely nothing wrong with this.
It's Apple's store.
You play by their rules.Apple has managed to help mobile developers make 4.6 BILLION dollars in the last year... That's about 4.5 billion dollars more than the industry made in the prior year.
Complain all you want.
What they're doing is working and working beyond anybodies wildest expectations... That is presuming that we define "working" as "making developers money so they can develop more great software".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037448</id>
	<title>Re:New app submission</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265398980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Make it that you earn gold points in shape of letter 'g' the better you shoot the apple.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Make it that you earn gold points in shape of letter 'g ' the better you shoot the apple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Make it that you earn gold points in shape of letter 'g' the better you shoot the apple.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037434</id>
	<title>Re:When is this ever false?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265398860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You say that like it's a <i>bad</i> thing.</p><p>Censorship is bad when the <i>government</i> does it or requires it. A merchant is within his rights to decide what he wishes or does not wish to stock in his store (modulo anti-trust concerns, which do not even come close to applying here). Calling an exercise of that right "censorship" is an insult to censors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You say that like it 's a bad thing.Censorship is bad when the government does it or requires it .
A merchant is within his rights to decide what he wishes or does not wish to stock in his store ( modulo anti-trust concerns , which do not even come close to applying here ) .
Calling an exercise of that right " censorship " is an insult to censors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You say that like it's a bad thing.Censorship is bad when the government does it or requires it.
A merchant is within his rights to decide what he wishes or does not wish to stock in his store (modulo anti-trust concerns, which do not even come close to applying here).
Calling an exercise of that right "censorship" is an insult to censors.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038420</id>
	<title>Good for Apple.</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1265403300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sick of seeing app descriptions like the one used for this app before the change.</p><p>Telling people that its great for Android is of no value what so ever to an iPhone user.</p><p>Its just a wasted fluff piece that takes up space for what should be a real app description.</p><p>Listing off the reasons why other people think your app is awesome BEFORE you actually tell anyone what your app does is fucking annoying for those of us looking for apps.</p><p>Most of us don't give a shit what awards you've one, awards are generally politically based and rarely a direct relation to how good something is, regardless of the award.</p><p>I don't want to read about 10 different awards you got, I want to know what the app does and what features its got that make it worth my money and/or time.</p><p>Everyone here is bitching about Apple being so controlling and 'censoring' and you guys STILL DON'T GET IT.  You keep going on about how Apple is wrong all the while ignoring that they have a growth rate thats off the charts.</p><p>I appreciate that Apple wants this pointless bit of information removed from the description, it does nothing useful to me.  I don't use android, and if I'm buying a flashcard app for my iPhone I'm probably not also going to carry it around on my Android phone since having both would be retarded in and of itself.</p><p>You might be wise to listen to their marketing department.  They've always been the smaller company that could.  People like Apple (outside of the fanboys of geekdom, we all have our own things that we love, we don't count) for a reason, maybe its cause they are trendy, but I think its more than that, and this is an example of one of those reasons.</p><p>When you go to the store and buy a boxed application that runs on OS X and Windows, and it says so on the box, its because it runs on both.  They don't put the OSX version in the box and advertise that you can go buy a Windows version if you want also.  Nor do Windows only versions of software tell you about the Mac version.  This App is sold in a store for software that when you buy/download it, it will only work on the iPhone (barring some hacked device that runs iPhone OS or a vm or simulator), so theres no reason to mention Android, it will just confuse all the people who have NO FREAKING IDEA what Android is, which is pretty much everyone outside this community.  They may know that Google has the Nexus One, or that you can buy a Droid, but they have no clue what Android OS is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sick of seeing app descriptions like the one used for this app before the change.Telling people that its great for Android is of no value what so ever to an iPhone user.Its just a wasted fluff piece that takes up space for what should be a real app description.Listing off the reasons why other people think your app is awesome BEFORE you actually tell anyone what your app does is fucking annoying for those of us looking for apps.Most of us do n't give a shit what awards you 've one , awards are generally politically based and rarely a direct relation to how good something is , regardless of the award.I do n't want to read about 10 different awards you got , I want to know what the app does and what features its got that make it worth my money and/or time.Everyone here is bitching about Apple being so controlling and 'censoring ' and you guys STILL DO N'T GET IT .
You keep going on about how Apple is wrong all the while ignoring that they have a growth rate thats off the charts.I appreciate that Apple wants this pointless bit of information removed from the description , it does nothing useful to me .
I do n't use android , and if I 'm buying a flashcard app for my iPhone I 'm probably not also going to carry it around on my Android phone since having both would be retarded in and of itself.You might be wise to listen to their marketing department .
They 've always been the smaller company that could .
People like Apple ( outside of the fanboys of geekdom , we all have our own things that we love , we do n't count ) for a reason , maybe its cause they are trendy , but I think its more than that , and this is an example of one of those reasons.When you go to the store and buy a boxed application that runs on OS X and Windows , and it says so on the box , its because it runs on both .
They do n't put the OSX version in the box and advertise that you can go buy a Windows version if you want also .
Nor do Windows only versions of software tell you about the Mac version .
This App is sold in a store for software that when you buy/download it , it will only work on the iPhone ( barring some hacked device that runs iPhone OS or a vm or simulator ) , so theres no reason to mention Android , it will just confuse all the people who have NO FREAKING IDEA what Android is , which is pretty much everyone outside this community .
They may know that Google has the Nexus One , or that you can buy a Droid , but they have no clue what Android OS is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sick of seeing app descriptions like the one used for this app before the change.Telling people that its great for Android is of no value what so ever to an iPhone user.Its just a wasted fluff piece that takes up space for what should be a real app description.Listing off the reasons why other people think your app is awesome BEFORE you actually tell anyone what your app does is fucking annoying for those of us looking for apps.Most of us don't give a shit what awards you've one, awards are generally politically based and rarely a direct relation to how good something is, regardless of the award.I don't want to read about 10 different awards you got, I want to know what the app does and what features its got that make it worth my money and/or time.Everyone here is bitching about Apple being so controlling and 'censoring' and you guys STILL DON'T GET IT.
You keep going on about how Apple is wrong all the while ignoring that they have a growth rate thats off the charts.I appreciate that Apple wants this pointless bit of information removed from the description, it does nothing useful to me.
I don't use android, and if I'm buying a flashcard app for my iPhone I'm probably not also going to carry it around on my Android phone since having both would be retarded in and of itself.You might be wise to listen to their marketing department.
They've always been the smaller company that could.
People like Apple (outside of the fanboys of geekdom, we all have our own things that we love, we don't count) for a reason, maybe its cause they are trendy, but I think its more than that, and this is an example of one of those reasons.When you go to the store and buy a boxed application that runs on OS X and Windows, and it says so on the box, its because it runs on both.
They don't put the OSX version in the box and advertise that you can go buy a Windows version if you want also.
Nor do Windows only versions of software tell you about the Mac version.
This App is sold in a store for software that when you buy/download it, it will only work on the iPhone (barring some hacked device that runs iPhone OS or a vm or simulator), so theres no reason to mention Android, it will just confuse all the people who have NO FREAKING IDEA what Android is, which is pretty much everyone outside this community.
They may know that Google has the Nexus One, or that you can buy a Droid, but they have no clue what Android OS is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038074</id>
	<title>Re:We're all mind readers</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1265401860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd even be ok with it if all they did was add a decent Watch Folder feature to it, so I can use my other (preferred) media software 99.9\% of the time and *only* use iTunes for iPhone sync. That retarded "Add To iTunes" folder is not even close to the same thing as being able to set a watch folder, especially since you can't replace it with a shortcut to your actual media library.</p><p>But yeah, what a piece of bloated crap software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd even be ok with it if all they did was add a decent Watch Folder feature to it , so I can use my other ( preferred ) media software 99.9 \ % of the time and * only * use iTunes for iPhone sync .
That retarded " Add To iTunes " folder is not even close to the same thing as being able to set a watch folder , especially since you ca n't replace it with a shortcut to your actual media library.But yeah , what a piece of bloated crap software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd even be ok with it if all they did was add a decent Watch Folder feature to it, so I can use my other (preferred) media software 99.9\% of the time and *only* use iTunes for iPhone sync.
That retarded "Add To iTunes" folder is not even close to the same thing as being able to set a watch folder, especially since you can't replace it with a shortcut to your actual media library.But yeah, what a piece of bloated crap software.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31044850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037494
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31041028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037878
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037338
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31045406
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31044860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31041058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036546
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31043722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31042750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31044150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036712
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31041300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31044630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037048
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_163253_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036120
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035880
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040888
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035776
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036230
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31041028
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038450
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039244
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039688
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037048
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037494
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31041300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035888
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035934
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037212
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037268
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038012
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038662
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31044860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036240
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037640
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037344
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037434
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31044850
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035820
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036570
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037012
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036186
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036700
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037942
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31044150
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037122
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037382
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31042750
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035712
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31043722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038150
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037408
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040806
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036050
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037448
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040180
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040920
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035844
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035778
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31041058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037878
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036734
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035954
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038266
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036052
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036458
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037754
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036470
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036348
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036712
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037164
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036546
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040720
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037954
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038682
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038420
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_163253.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31035720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036010
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036190
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040954
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037972
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040096
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036326
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036684
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037800
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31044630
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038350
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038264
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036760
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31039036
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036502
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036288
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036788
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038478
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31038074
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036194
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040464
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036478
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31040130
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31045406
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31037142
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_163253.31036392
</commentlist>
</conversation>
