<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_04_1442214</id>
	<title>Bill Gates Knows What You Did Last Summer</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1265304600000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>theodp writes <i>"Give Bill Gates your 'pictures, videos, documents, e-mail, instant messages, addresses, calendar dates/scheduling information (e.g., birthdays, anniversaries, appointments), voice mail, phone logs, RSS feeds, subscriptions, bookmarks, mail lists, project management features, computing device data, tasks and location data,' and he'll improve your 'quality of life.' That's the promise behind a <a href="http://techflash.com/seattle/2010/02/gates\_ozzie\_other\_microsoft\_execs\_patent\_personal\_data\_mining.html">patent issued Thursday to Bill Gates and his 20 co-inventors for 'Personal Data Mining'</a>, which Microsoft notes 'can include a monetization component' that 'could initiate an auction to sell information to the highest bidder.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>theodp writes " Give Bill Gates your 'pictures , videos , documents , e-mail , instant messages , addresses , calendar dates/scheduling information ( e.g. , birthdays , anniversaries , appointments ) , voice mail , phone logs , RSS feeds , subscriptions , bookmarks , mail lists , project management features , computing device data , tasks and location data, ' and he 'll improve your 'quality of life .
' That 's the promise behind a patent issued Thursday to Bill Gates and his 20 co-inventors for 'Personal Data Mining ' , which Microsoft notes 'can include a monetization component ' that 'could initiate an auction to sell information to the highest bidder .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>theodp writes "Give Bill Gates your 'pictures, videos, documents, e-mail, instant messages, addresses, calendar dates/scheduling information (e.g., birthdays, anniversaries, appointments), voice mail, phone logs, RSS feeds, subscriptions, bookmarks, mail lists, project management features, computing device data, tasks and location data,' and he'll improve your 'quality of life.
' That's the promise behind a patent issued Thursday to Bill Gates and his 20 co-inventors for 'Personal Data Mining', which Microsoft notes 'can include a monetization component' that 'could initiate an auction to sell information to the highest bidder.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024312</id>
	<title>Digital blackmail worm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265308500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> 1.  Collect user's information<br>
&nbsp; 2.  Offer that information to the highest bidder<br>
&nbsp; 3.  Include the person of interest in the bidding<br>
&nbsp; 4.  Profit!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Collect user 's information   2 .
Offer that information to the highest bidder   3 .
Include the person of interest in the bidding   4 .
Profit ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> 1.
Collect user's information
  2.
Offer that information to the highest bidder
  3.
Include the person of interest in the bidding
  4.
Profit!!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026776</id>
	<title>Google should be pissed</title>
	<author>Vermyndax</author>
	<datestamp>1265277120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...for Gates patenting their complete business model.  Is it more evil that Google didn't patent it, or is it worse that they kept it on the down-low?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...for Gates patenting their complete business model .
Is it more evil that Google did n't patent it , or is it worse that they kept it on the down-low ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...for Gates patenting their complete business model.
Is it more evil that Google didn't patent it, or is it worse that they kept it on the down-low?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025212</id>
	<title>Sigh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265312580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sooo... if Gates and friends got this patent, does that mean that what other companies do already to the avg web surfer become patent infringement?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sooo... if Gates and friends got this patent , does that mean that what other companies do already to the avg web surfer become patent infringement ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sooo... if Gates and friends got this patent, does that mean that what other companies do already to the avg web surfer become patent infringement?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024862</id>
	<title>Help me be social</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265310960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously.</p><p>I'll let an algo troll through all my personal data if it does the following:</p><p>a. helps me to become more social<br>b. helps me to meet people who can expand my views<br>c. help me to engage in consensual sexual activities [between another human and myself]</p><p>If it succeeds on <b>at least</b> two of the three areas, I'll lead a richer, fuller life. And if it can do all three, hell. Sell the data, make as much money off of it as you want! I'll be too busy enjoying my new relationships with real people in the real world.</p><p>Back to the shell.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously.I 'll let an algo troll through all my personal data if it does the following : a. helps me to become more socialb .
helps me to meet people who can expand my viewsc .
help me to engage in consensual sexual activities [ between another human and myself ] If it succeeds on at least two of the three areas , I 'll lead a richer , fuller life .
And if it can do all three , hell .
Sell the data , make as much money off of it as you want !
I 'll be too busy enjoying my new relationships with real people in the real world.Back to the shell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.I'll let an algo troll through all my personal data if it does the following:a. helps me to become more socialb.
helps me to meet people who can expand my viewsc.
help me to engage in consensual sexual activities [between another human and myself]If it succeeds on at least two of the three areas, I'll lead a richer, fuller life.
And if it can do all three, hell.
Sell the data, make as much money off of it as you want!
I'll be too busy enjoying my new relationships with real people in the real world.Back to the shell.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024348</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>goldaryn</author>
	<datestamp>1265308620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is not privacy essential to a high quality of life?</p></div><p>
It's helpful for a "high" quality of life..</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is not privacy essential to a high quality of life ?
It 's helpful for a " high " quality of life. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is not privacy essential to a high quality of life?
It's helpful for a "high" quality of life..
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026298</id>
	<title>Bill has lost his mind</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265275140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Should not he just retire and not do any more evil?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Should not he just retire and not do any more evil ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Should not he just retire and not do any more evil?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024676</id>
	<title>We know something about Bill Gates too</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1265310120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He started watching Caprica.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He started watching Caprica .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He started watching Caprica.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024460</id>
	<title>Awesome!</title>
	<author>KiwiCanuck</author>
	<datestamp>1265309040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thanks Big Brother! (1984)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks Big Brother !
( 1984 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks Big Brother!
(1984)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024292</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>fatherjoecode</author>
	<datestamp>1265308440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is nothing higher than that of the party and big brother.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is nothing higher than that of the party and big brother .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is nothing higher than that of the party and big brother.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025906</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>anyGould</author>
	<datestamp>1265316720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, if you want to stop at the bottom of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow's\_hierarchy\_of\_needs" title="wikipedia.org">Maslow's hierarchy</a> [wikipedia.org], I suppose that's up to you. Personally, I'd like to live in a world where my every action and movement isn't sold to the highest bidder.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if you want to stop at the bottom of Maslow 's hierarchy [ wikipedia.org ] , I suppose that 's up to you .
Personally , I 'd like to live in a world where my every action and movement is n't sold to the highest bidder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if you want to stop at the bottom of Maslow's hierarchy [wikipedia.org], I suppose that's up to you.
Personally, I'd like to live in a world where my every action and movement isn't sold to the highest bidder.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024370</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024278</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>InsaneProcessor</author>
	<datestamp>1265308380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is why most of that data resides in devices that cannot be mined (like never connected to a network).</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why most of that data resides in devices that can not be mined ( like never connected to a network ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why most of that data resides in devices that cannot be mined (like never connected to a network).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024554</id>
	<title>why is this only evil if Google does it :)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265309520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&amp;id=9282036" title="slashdot.org">Who pioneered the WEB</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who pioneered the WEB [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who pioneered the WEB [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024754</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>vux984</author>
	<datestamp>1265310360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Perhaps you should take a moment to define what sets the quality of your life - I define it by clean drinking water, warm shelter, and having access to entertainment.</i></p><p>Ah, so for you 'Brave New World' was utopia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps you should take a moment to define what sets the quality of your life - I define it by clean drinking water , warm shelter , and having access to entertainment.Ah , so for you 'Brave New World ' was utopia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps you should take a moment to define what sets the quality of your life - I define it by clean drinking water, warm shelter, and having access to entertainment.Ah, so for you 'Brave New World' was utopia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024370</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024540</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265309460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I define it by clean drinking water, warm shelter, and having access to entertainment.</p></div><p>

All of which can be found in prison. Way to shoot for the stars, champ.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I define it by clean drinking water , warm shelter , and having access to entertainment .
All of which can be found in prison .
Way to shoot for the stars , champ .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I define it by clean drinking water, warm shelter, and having access to entertainment.
All of which can be found in prison.
Way to shoot for the stars, champ.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024370</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024818</id>
	<title>Want privacy, be very very boring</title>
	<author>Shivetya</author>
	<datestamp>1265310780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>being so boring and uninteresting as to induce coma in people looking into your life is all you need.</p><p>We are a social society, far many will decry privacy loss and turn around post to internet sites and the like</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>being so boring and uninteresting as to induce coma in people looking into your life is all you need.We are a social society , far many will decry privacy loss and turn around post to internet sites and the like</tokentext>
<sentencetext>being so boring and uninteresting as to induce coma in people looking into your life is all you need.We are a social society, far many will decry privacy loss and turn around post to internet sites and the like</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025236</id>
	<title>Re:Your existence as you know it is over</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1265312760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You do realize that your grandmother is probably a cyborg, don't you? If she has an artificial hip, knee, pacemaker, or any other device incorporated in her body that aids in its functions, she's a cyborg.</p><p>You will  be assimilated. You will pay good money to be assimilated!</p><p>When I was assimilated in <a href="http://slashdot.org/~sm62704/journal/141778" title="slashdot.org">2006</a> [slashdot.org] my existance as I knew it was over. And I'm thankful as hell!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do realize that your grandmother is probably a cyborg , do n't you ?
If she has an artificial hip , knee , pacemaker , or any other device incorporated in her body that aids in its functions , she 's a cyborg.You will be assimilated .
You will pay good money to be assimilated ! When I was assimilated in 2006 [ slashdot.org ] my existance as I knew it was over .
And I 'm thankful as hell !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do realize that your grandmother is probably a cyborg, don't you?
If she has an artificial hip, knee, pacemaker, or any other device incorporated in her body that aids in its functions, she's a cyborg.You will  be assimilated.
You will pay good money to be assimilated!When I was assimilated in 2006 [slashdot.org] my existance as I knew it was over.
And I'm thankful as hell!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230</id>
	<title>Privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265308200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is not privacy essential to a high quality of life?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is not privacy essential to a high quality of life ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is not privacy essential to a high quality of life?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024568</id>
	<title>Yea yea, just another one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265309580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so what? apple and google have been doing this for over a decade</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so what ?
apple and google have been doing this for over a decade</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so what?
apple and google have been doing this for over a decade</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31027388</id>
	<title>Brave New World is...</title>
	<author>Demonoid-Penguin</author>
	<datestamp>1265279880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>a boot stamping on your face forever.</htmltext>
<tokenext>a boot stamping on your face forever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a boot stamping on your face forever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025318</id>
	<title>Re:And Microsoft Loses to Google AGAIN!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265313240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>haha indeed... he's patenting google's established practices. He just has to pretend being soft so it doesn't sound too illegal you know.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>haha indeed... he 's patenting google 's established practices .
He just has to pretend being soft so it does n't sound too illegal you know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>haha indeed... he's patenting google's established practices.
He just has to pretend being soft so it doesn't sound too illegal you know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024366</id>
	<title>Choice?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265308680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So I guess the real choice is whether you want Bill Gates to have all your data, or Steve Jobs.  But either way, google already has it.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So I guess the real choice is whether you want Bill Gates to have all your data , or Steve Jobs .
But either way , google already has it .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I guess the real choice is whether you want Bill Gates to have all your data, or Steve Jobs.
But either way, google already has it.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31032480</id>
	<title>Facebook, anyone?</title>
	<author>Trogre</author>
	<datestamp>1265363640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course, Bill is already well on the way to getting said data, particularly when people seem happy to load up most of it to Facebook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , Bill is already well on the way to getting said data , particularly when people seem happy to load up most of it to Facebook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, Bill is already well on the way to getting said data, particularly when people seem happy to load up most of it to Facebook.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024288</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265308380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not for everyone.</p><p>The way to combat this is to kill the monetization component. The way to do that is to beat Bill to the punch and give all your data to everyone before he does, so they have to motivation to buy it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not for everyone.The way to combat this is to kill the monetization component .
The way to do that is to beat Bill to the punch and give all your data to everyone before he does , so they have to motivation to buy it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not for everyone.The way to combat this is to kill the monetization component.
The way to do that is to beat Bill to the punch and give all your data to everyone before he does, so they have to motivation to buy it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025710</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>vadim\_t</author>
	<datestamp>1265315580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Okay, I'm confused. Whenever privacy is discussed around here, we say "wouldn't it be great if we could retain personal control over our data, and could willingly decide whom to sell our data to?"</p><p>
&nbsp; So know someone with a great deal of economic leverage is trying to push exactly such a system, and all of slashdot goes "Oh my god, how evil! Quick, everyone give your data away for free, so nobody can monetize them any more, not even yourself!"</p></div></blockquote><p>Where do you get the user would get to set a price? And why would somebody interested in letting people put their data on sale patent it, which would ensure very few people could do it?</p><p>In any case, I object to the data being collected in the first place.</p><blockquote><div><p>Guys, Bill Gates stopped being the most evil man about five years ago. I care much less about the shortcomings of Windows than I care about Google and Facebook knowing more about me than I do myself. At this point, I'd be willing to pay Bill Gates if he offers to secure all my personal data.</p></div></blockquote><p>No, he's still evil, he just moved to doing <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2009/12/17/boycott-gates-foundation/" title="boycottnovell.com">other kinds</a> [boycottnovell.com] of it.</p><p>The still has an enormous influence and can use it to evil ends.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay , I 'm confused .
Whenever privacy is discussed around here , we say " would n't it be great if we could retain personal control over our data , and could willingly decide whom to sell our data to ?
"   So know someone with a great deal of economic leverage is trying to push exactly such a system , and all of slashdot goes " Oh my god , how evil !
Quick , everyone give your data away for free , so nobody can monetize them any more , not even yourself !
" Where do you get the user would get to set a price ?
And why would somebody interested in letting people put their data on sale patent it , which would ensure very few people could do it ? In any case , I object to the data being collected in the first place.Guys , Bill Gates stopped being the most evil man about five years ago .
I care much less about the shortcomings of Windows than I care about Google and Facebook knowing more about me than I do myself .
At this point , I 'd be willing to pay Bill Gates if he offers to secure all my personal data.No , he 's still evil , he just moved to doing other kinds [ boycottnovell.com ] of it.The still has an enormous influence and can use it to evil ends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay, I'm confused.
Whenever privacy is discussed around here, we say "wouldn't it be great if we could retain personal control over our data, and could willingly decide whom to sell our data to?
"
  So know someone with a great deal of economic leverage is trying to push exactly such a system, and all of slashdot goes "Oh my god, how evil!
Quick, everyone give your data away for free, so nobody can monetize them any more, not even yourself!
"Where do you get the user would get to set a price?
And why would somebody interested in letting people put their data on sale patent it, which would ensure very few people could do it?In any case, I object to the data being collected in the first place.Guys, Bill Gates stopped being the most evil man about five years ago.
I care much less about the shortcomings of Windows than I care about Google and Facebook knowing more about me than I do myself.
At this point, I'd be willing to pay Bill Gates if he offers to secure all my personal data.No, he's still evil, he just moved to doing other kinds [boycottnovell.com] of it.The still has an enormous influence and can use it to evil ends.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024884</id>
	<title>Facebook</title>
	<author>rxan</author>
	<datestamp>1265311080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought we already had Mark Zuckerberg to thank for this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought we already had Mark Zuckerberg to thank for this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought we already had Mark Zuckerberg to thank for this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024824</id>
	<title>Re: Bill Gates Knows What You Did Last Summer</title>
	<author>element-o.p.</author>
	<datestamp>1265310840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ummm...used Linux?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ummm...used Linux ?
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ummm...used Linux?
:P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025128</id>
	<title>It's just a patent</title>
	<author>Seth Kriticos</author>
	<datestamp>1265312220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having a patent on doing evil does not mean you have to use it. That's what market lock-in monopoly is for. Oh, wait.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having a patent on doing evil does not mean you have to use it .
That 's what market lock-in monopoly is for .
Oh , wait .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having a patent on doing evil does not mean you have to use it.
That's what market lock-in monopoly is for.
Oh, wait.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024946</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>Thaelon</author>
	<datestamp>1265311320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your privacy isn't essential to his quality of life, no.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your privacy is n't essential to his quality of life , no .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your privacy isn't essential to his quality of life, no.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024428</id>
	<title>Cylons?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265308920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So Gates ends up creating the Cylons right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So Gates ends up creating the Cylons right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So Gates ends up creating the Cylons right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024918</id>
	<title>But don't they have that already?</title>
	<author>edxwelch</author>
	<datestamp>1265311200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought Windows media player has being doing that all along since Windows xp came out?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought Windows media player has being doing that all along since Windows xp came out ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought Windows media player has being doing that all along since Windows xp came out?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025904</id>
	<title>Re:He wants to recreate you virtually!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265316720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and then he will use your virtual avatar and put it into a military robot... we know where that goes!</p><p>Yeah, but on the upside, you might end up getting engaged to a beautiful native princess with blue skin and feline features.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... and then he will use your virtual avatar and put it into a military robot... we know where that goes ! Yeah , but on the upside , you might end up getting engaged to a beautiful native princess with blue skin and feline features .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... and then he will use your virtual avatar and put it into a military robot... we know where that goes!Yeah, but on the upside, you might end up getting engaged to a beautiful native princess with blue skin and feline features.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025118</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>Mister Whirly</author>
	<datestamp>1265312160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ah, so that is the answer. I always got this one wrong on my SAT.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , so that is the answer .
I always got this one wrong on my SAT .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, so that is the answer.
I always got this one wrong on my SAT.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024472</id>
	<title>An obvious case for prior art</title>
	<author>way2trivial</author>
	<datestamp>1265309100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>see this link<br><a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/privacypolicy.html" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/intl/en/privacypolicy.html</a> [google.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>see this linkhttp : //www.google.com/intl/en/privacypolicy.html [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>see this linkhttp://www.google.com/intl/en/privacypolicy.html [google.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31028778</id>
	<title>Re:Bing is supposedly better than Google, rememebe</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265287260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Redmond?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Redmond ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Redmond?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026150</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>IdleTime</author>
	<datestamp>1265274540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Doing any of the things the patent and the article suggests in Norway is illegal. If you have the permission to collect any form of private data from a client you have to protect it and you can only collect what is absolutely necessary and under no circumstances can you sell any part of the information collected.<br> <br>It just baffles me that other countries are so lax when it comes to private information.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Doing any of the things the patent and the article suggests in Norway is illegal .
If you have the permission to collect any form of private data from a client you have to protect it and you can only collect what is absolutely necessary and under no circumstances can you sell any part of the information collected .
It just baffles me that other countries are so lax when it comes to private information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doing any of the things the patent and the article suggests in Norway is illegal.
If you have the permission to collect any form of private data from a client you have to protect it and you can only collect what is absolutely necessary and under no circumstances can you sell any part of the information collected.
It just baffles me that other countries are so lax when it comes to private information.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025234</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>An ominous Cow art</author>
	<datestamp>1265312700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it's time to post a link to this <a href="http://www.sff.net/people/Jack.Haldeman/state2.htm" title="sff.net">story</a> [sff.net] again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it 's time to post a link to this story [ sff.net ] again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it's time to post a link to this story [sff.net] again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026456</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1265275740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video\_Privacy\_Protection\_Act" title="wikipedia.org">Video Privacy Protection Act</a> [wikipedia.org] was passed after the video rental records of a Supreme Court nominee were leaked.  So your suggestion does have precedence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Video Privacy Protection Act [ wikipedia.org ] was passed after the video rental records of a Supreme Court nominee were leaked .
So your suggestion does have precedence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Video Privacy Protection Act [wikipedia.org] was passed after the video rental records of a Supreme Court nominee were leaked.
So your suggestion does have precedence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025382</id>
	<title>And people complain about Google?</title>
	<author>miffo.swe</author>
	<datestamp>1265313600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If Google somehow gets taken out of the picture, this is what we are facing. I much rather have Google sucking my tits than Microsoft taking me hard from behind with a pinapple thank you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If Google somehow gets taken out of the picture , this is what we are facing .
I much rather have Google sucking my tits than Microsoft taking me hard from behind with a pinapple thank you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Google somehow gets taken out of the picture, this is what we are facing.
I much rather have Google sucking my tits than Microsoft taking me hard from behind with a pinapple thank you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31029158</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265289660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's a silly idea that you can stop the non-scarcity of the information about you from getting into private hands, if you belive that I got a bridge I want to sell you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a silly idea that you can stop the non-scarcity of the information about you from getting into private hands , if you belive that I got a bridge I want to sell you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a silly idea that you can stop the non-scarcity of the information about you from getting into private hands, if you belive that I got a bridge I want to sell you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024990</id>
	<title>Identity Auctions</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1265311620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That's the promise behind a patent issued Thursday to Bill Gates and his 20 co-inventors for 'Personal Data Mining', which Microsoft notes 'can include a monetization component' that 'could initiate an auction to sell information to the highest bidder.'</p></div><p>'Cause it's not identity theft if you get paid for it?</p><p>Eventually we will all have our own immortal Cylon simulacra dopplegangers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the promise behind a patent issued Thursday to Bill Gates and his 20 co-inventors for 'Personal Data Mining ' , which Microsoft notes 'can include a monetization component ' that 'could initiate an auction to sell information to the highest bidder .
''Cause it 's not identity theft if you get paid for it ? Eventually we will all have our own immortal Cylon simulacra dopplegangers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's the promise behind a patent issued Thursday to Bill Gates and his 20 co-inventors for 'Personal Data Mining', which Microsoft notes 'can include a monetization component' that 'could initiate an auction to sell information to the highest bidder.
''Cause it's not identity theft if you get paid for it?Eventually we will all have our own immortal Cylon simulacra dopplegangers.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31027500</id>
	<title>A "privacy" article at Techflash?  Really?</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1265280480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're running AdBlock, click on the blacklist for that site.  In my case, it's literally the first time I've seen that AdBlock has a mechanism for handling more blocked scripts than my screen can display.</p><p>If you're not running AdBlock, and you value your privacy at all, don't read the article.</p><p>6 Doubleclick cookies, a Quantserve pixel, cookies AND a pixel image from 2o7, more scripts from more companies than I care to count.</p><p>"My God!  It's full of crap!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're running AdBlock , click on the blacklist for that site .
In my case , it 's literally the first time I 've seen that AdBlock has a mechanism for handling more blocked scripts than my screen can display.If you 're not running AdBlock , and you value your privacy at all , do n't read the article.6 Doubleclick cookies , a Quantserve pixel , cookies AND a pixel image from 2o7 , more scripts from more companies than I care to count .
" My God !
It 's full of crap !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're running AdBlock, click on the blacklist for that site.
In my case, it's literally the first time I've seen that AdBlock has a mechanism for handling more blocked scripts than my screen can display.If you're not running AdBlock, and you value your privacy at all, don't read the article.6 Doubleclick cookies, a Quantserve pixel, cookies AND a pixel image from 2o7, more scripts from more companies than I care to count.
"My God!
It's full of crap!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025784</id>
	<title>The end of Google?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265316180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So Microsoft is patenting Google.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So Microsoft is patenting Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So Microsoft is patenting Google.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026324</id>
	<title>Re:One note about data mining...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265275260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A better way is to use multiple spellings for your name, and multiple email addresses. Including middle names, using short forms (Mike versus Michael), and slight mispelling* sometimes work for places that do not care.</p><p>The easiest method is to add "+company" to your email address, if you use gmail. For instance, if I get spam from myname+microsoft2010\_01@gmail.com , I know that Microsoft leaked the email address or Microsoft is spamming me.</p><p>*A utility misspelled my name, and has refused to let me change that name because I cannot prove that I am that person. I have just stopped trying, and I still pay the utilities.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A better way is to use multiple spellings for your name , and multiple email addresses .
Including middle names , using short forms ( Mike versus Michael ) , and slight mispelling * sometimes work for places that do not care.The easiest method is to add " + company " to your email address , if you use gmail .
For instance , if I get spam from myname + microsoft2010 \ _01 @ gmail.com , I know that Microsoft leaked the email address or Microsoft is spamming me .
* A utility misspelled my name , and has refused to let me change that name because I can not prove that I am that person .
I have just stopped trying , and I still pay the utilities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A better way is to use multiple spellings for your name, and multiple email addresses.
Including middle names, using short forms (Mike versus Michael), and slight mispelling* sometimes work for places that do not care.The easiest method is to add "+company" to your email address, if you use gmail.
For instance, if I get spam from myname+microsoft2010\_01@gmail.com , I know that Microsoft leaked the email address or Microsoft is spamming me.
*A utility misspelled my name, and has refused to let me change that name because I cannot prove that I am that person.
I have just stopped trying, and I still pay the utilities.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026000</id>
	<title>Re:One note about data mining...</title>
	<author>Jackie\_Chan\_Fan</author>
	<datestamp>1265274000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm buying stock in Slim Jim and Charmin<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm buying stock in Slim Jim and Charmin : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm buying stock in Slim Jim and Charmin :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024396</id>
	<title>Your existence as you know it is over</title>
	<author>pedrop357</author>
	<datestamp>1265308800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You will adapt to service us.  We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own.</p><p>We only wish to improve quality of life...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You will adapt to service us .
We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own.We only wish to improve quality of life.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You will adapt to service us.
We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own.We only wish to improve quality of life...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025116</id>
	<title>Re:Minor correction</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1265312160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This must be Thursday , I never could get the hang of Thursdays .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025310</id>
	<title>Re:No</title>
	<author>Fred\_A</author>
	<datestamp>1265313240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Privacy is not essential to a high quality of life. Having other people merely know everything you do will not decrease your quality of life. To do that, others would have to act on that information in a way that hurts you. If you are confidant that others can not use personal information against you, then there is no need for privacy.</p></div><p>Obviously that theoretical community of yours would not include any humans. People will use information to gain advantage on others, if only for the hell of it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Privacy is not essential to a high quality of life .
Having other people merely know everything you do will not decrease your quality of life .
To do that , others would have to act on that information in a way that hurts you .
If you are confidant that others can not use personal information against you , then there is no need for privacy.Obviously that theoretical community of yours would not include any humans .
People will use information to gain advantage on others , if only for the hell of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Privacy is not essential to a high quality of life.
Having other people merely know everything you do will not decrease your quality of life.
To do that, others would have to act on that information in a way that hurts you.
If you are confidant that others can not use personal information against you, then there is no need for privacy.Obviously that theoretical community of yours would not include any humans.
People will use information to gain advantage on others, if only for the hell of it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026488</id>
	<title>And then...</title>
	<author>frank\_adrian314159</author>
	<datestamp>1265275920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When you hand him your soul, too, your happiness for the rest of your life is ensured...  It's in the blood-signed EULA.  Don't worry about the fine print.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When you hand him your soul , too , your happiness for the rest of your life is ensured... It 's in the blood-signed EULA .
Do n't worry about the fine print .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you hand him your soul, too, your happiness for the rest of your life is ensured...  It's in the blood-signed EULA.
Don't worry about the fine print.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31027766</id>
	<title>Pay for play</title>
	<author>seven of five</author>
	<datestamp>1265281920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What if the monetization went to the rightful individuals, and Bill &amp; Friends got, say, 10\% for managing the thing.
Then you could volunteer your data and be compensated for it. With some demographics more valuable than others, you'd create markets.<br> <br>The current system where corp's assume you're handing your data over for free so they can resell it should be recognized for the fraud it is and renegotiated accordingly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What if the monetization went to the rightful individuals , and Bill &amp; Friends got , say , 10 \ % for managing the thing .
Then you could volunteer your data and be compensated for it .
With some demographics more valuable than others , you 'd create markets .
The current system where corp 's assume you 're handing your data over for free so they can resell it should be recognized for the fraud it is and renegotiated accordingly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if the monetization went to the rightful individuals, and Bill &amp; Friends got, say, 10\% for managing the thing.
Then you could volunteer your data and be compensated for it.
With some demographics more valuable than others, you'd create markets.
The current system where corp's assume you're handing your data over for free so they can resell it should be recognized for the fraud it is and renegotiated accordingly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025704</id>
	<title>Re:He wants to recreate you virtually!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265315580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously! Has no one gotten the Caprica reference?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously !
Has no one gotten the Caprica reference ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously!
Has no one gotten the Caprica reference?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025368</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265313480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Social security was NEVER intended to be a person's sole source of retirement income. It was designed to be a small boost to what a person had saved themselves. Too bad there's so many lazy, entitled, socialists who decided playing and having fun was more important than working hard and making sure they could take care of themselves.</p><p>Don't try and pretend that these people are poor because they couldn't help it. They are poor because they chose to be, because they chose to not get good grades in school, because they decided working 40 hours a week was just too hard, because they chose to have sex before getting married and ended up with a kid or four, and so on and so on.</p><p>Social security is broken only because there are so many ignorant lazy people who actually believe it's supposed to be enough to live on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Social security was NEVER intended to be a person 's sole source of retirement income .
It was designed to be a small boost to what a person had saved themselves .
Too bad there 's so many lazy , entitled , socialists who decided playing and having fun was more important than working hard and making sure they could take care of themselves.Do n't try and pretend that these people are poor because they could n't help it .
They are poor because they chose to be , because they chose to not get good grades in school , because they decided working 40 hours a week was just too hard , because they chose to have sex before getting married and ended up with a kid or four , and so on and so on.Social security is broken only because there are so many ignorant lazy people who actually believe it 's supposed to be enough to live on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Social security was NEVER intended to be a person's sole source of retirement income.
It was designed to be a small boost to what a person had saved themselves.
Too bad there's so many lazy, entitled, socialists who decided playing and having fun was more important than working hard and making sure they could take care of themselves.Don't try and pretend that these people are poor because they couldn't help it.
They are poor because they chose to be, because they chose to not get good grades in school, because they decided working 40 hours a week was just too hard, because they chose to have sex before getting married and ended up with a kid or four, and so on and so on.Social security is broken only because there are so many ignorant lazy people who actually believe it's supposed to be enough to live on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024308</id>
	<title>Hmm</title>
	<author>goldaryn</author>
	<datestamp>1265308500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Gates can have all that stuff, but there's no way I'm giving him my chair</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gates can have all that stuff , but there 's no way I 'm giving him my chair</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gates can have all that stuff, but there's no way I'm giving him my chair</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31027492</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265280420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Be careful when you do that. If you gather personal information on a politician you are a terrorist, if you gather personal information on everyone else you are a politician.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Be careful when you do that .
If you gather personal information on a politician you are a terrorist , if you gather personal information on everyone else you are a politician .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Be careful when you do that.
If you gather personal information on a politician you are a terrorist, if you gather personal information on everyone else you are a politician.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024690</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265310120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Privacy is like the answering "No" to a request.  It will keep you out of trouble, and avoid risk.  However it will avoid a lot of reward.</p><p>For example having you information public or more public will help better targeted adds to you (Yea sound bad at first but... If you are in a market for say a new computer and the computer you were looking at happen to have an add with a 15\% off coupon then you are better off getting 15\% off then not.</p><p>Or knowing what type of food you like. You go to an area and it will show what food places that you would eat at that are near by say on your iphone... Vs. say a search for Sushi and end up getting flatworm.</p><p>One key think you need to remember. Most people really don't care about you.  Just as long as you have protection against Identity Theft most people really wont bother digging into your details and causing problems in your life.</p><p>Even so we do have more privacy with all this electronics today then we ever did.<br>Back in the old days you go to the local store engaged in the local gossip in general you know everything that everyone did.  Today the information we get about people are statical in nature and jumping to conclusions is much more difficult.</p><p>The old days.  George bought a steak he must be doing rather well.  Today. George Smith personID 294881992929111.  294881992929111 bought qty 3 of item 10020011, item 10020011 is called steak. 10020011 price is $4.00 per unit. 294881992929111 payment was via Credit Card number 9222-1222-3221-1233, credit card number 9222-1222-3221-1233 belongs to 294881992929111.</p><p>Almost everyone who look at the data will probably will not try to link everything together as it will create too much information for them to handle. So they will only look at things that they care about... How Many Steaks did they sell during this period of time... How Many should I buy.   Who has shown a trend in buying steaks should they get a coupon.  How many steaks are sold at $4.00 per unit vs. $3.59 per unit.  It is more profitible to sell the cheaper or more expensive steaks...</p><p>For the most part people don't really care about you today.  So yes we are spreading more information about ourselves however its aggregation makes it hard to make any real calls that could really effect your quality of life.</p><p>That is of course you take out Identity Thief which is still a problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Privacy is like the answering " No " to a request .
It will keep you out of trouble , and avoid risk .
However it will avoid a lot of reward.For example having you information public or more public will help better targeted adds to you ( Yea sound bad at first but... If you are in a market for say a new computer and the computer you were looking at happen to have an add with a 15 \ % off coupon then you are better off getting 15 \ % off then not.Or knowing what type of food you like .
You go to an area and it will show what food places that you would eat at that are near by say on your iphone... Vs. say a search for Sushi and end up getting flatworm.One key think you need to remember .
Most people really do n't care about you .
Just as long as you have protection against Identity Theft most people really wont bother digging into your details and causing problems in your life.Even so we do have more privacy with all this electronics today then we ever did.Back in the old days you go to the local store engaged in the local gossip in general you know everything that everyone did .
Today the information we get about people are statical in nature and jumping to conclusions is much more difficult.The old days .
George bought a steak he must be doing rather well .
Today. George Smith personID 294881992929111 .
294881992929111 bought qty 3 of item 10020011 , item 10020011 is called steak .
10020011 price is $ 4.00 per unit .
294881992929111 payment was via Credit Card number 9222-1222-3221-1233 , credit card number 9222-1222-3221-1233 belongs to 294881992929111.Almost everyone who look at the data will probably will not try to link everything together as it will create too much information for them to handle .
So they will only look at things that they care about... How Many Steaks did they sell during this period of time... How Many should I buy .
Who has shown a trend in buying steaks should they get a coupon .
How many steaks are sold at $ 4.00 per unit vs. $ 3.59 per unit .
It is more profitible to sell the cheaper or more expensive steaks...For the most part people do n't really care about you today .
So yes we are spreading more information about ourselves however its aggregation makes it hard to make any real calls that could really effect your quality of life.That is of course you take out Identity Thief which is still a problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Privacy is like the answering "No" to a request.
It will keep you out of trouble, and avoid risk.
However it will avoid a lot of reward.For example having you information public or more public will help better targeted adds to you (Yea sound bad at first but... If you are in a market for say a new computer and the computer you were looking at happen to have an add with a 15\% off coupon then you are better off getting 15\% off then not.Or knowing what type of food you like.
You go to an area and it will show what food places that you would eat at that are near by say on your iphone... Vs. say a search for Sushi and end up getting flatworm.One key think you need to remember.
Most people really don't care about you.
Just as long as you have protection against Identity Theft most people really wont bother digging into your details and causing problems in your life.Even so we do have more privacy with all this electronics today then we ever did.Back in the old days you go to the local store engaged in the local gossip in general you know everything that everyone did.
Today the information we get about people are statical in nature and jumping to conclusions is much more difficult.The old days.
George bought a steak he must be doing rather well.
Today. George Smith personID 294881992929111.
294881992929111 bought qty 3 of item 10020011, item 10020011 is called steak.
10020011 price is $4.00 per unit.
294881992929111 payment was via Credit Card number 9222-1222-3221-1233, credit card number 9222-1222-3221-1233 belongs to 294881992929111.Almost everyone who look at the data will probably will not try to link everything together as it will create too much information for them to handle.
So they will only look at things that they care about... How Many Steaks did they sell during this period of time... How Many should I buy.
Who has shown a trend in buying steaks should they get a coupon.
How many steaks are sold at $4.00 per unit vs. $3.59 per unit.
It is more profitible to sell the cheaper or more expensive steaks...For the most part people don't really care about you today.
So yes we are spreading more information about ourselves however its aggregation makes it hard to make any real calls that could really effect your quality of life.That is of course you take out Identity Thief which is still a problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024444</id>
	<title>Minor correction</title>
	<author>dtmos</author>
	<datestamp>1265308980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This patent did not issue on Thursday.  US patents always issue on Tuesdays.  This one issued on 2 February.</p><p>The USPTO publishes patent applications (18 months after filing) on Thursdays.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This patent did not issue on Thursday .
US patents always issue on Tuesdays .
This one issued on 2 February.The USPTO publishes patent applications ( 18 months after filing ) on Thursdays .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This patent did not issue on Thursday.
US patents always issue on Tuesdays.
This one issued on 2 February.The USPTO publishes patent applications (18 months after filing) on Thursdays.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024644</id>
	<title>If this isn't....</title>
	<author>Slash.Poop</author>
	<datestamp>1265309940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If this isn't a sign of the coming apocalypse I don't know what is.<br>
Make preparations for the rapture now. I mean, am I right or am I right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If this is n't a sign of the coming apocalypse I do n't know what is .
Make preparations for the rapture now .
I mean , am I right or am I right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this isn't a sign of the coming apocalypse I don't know what is.
Make preparations for the rapture now.
I mean, am I right or am I right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025012</id>
	<title>One note about data mining...</title>
	<author>NecroPuppy</author>
	<datestamp>1265311680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You get such interesting stuff when it's way off.</p><p>I recently picked up, at a going out of business sale, a piece of jewelry that was normally $1200 for less than $200.</p><p>Since then, I've gotten several high end credit card offers, none of which I would normally qualify for.</p><p>So mess with the system.</p><p>Use your grocery store card... but only when buying beef jerkey and toilet paper.<br>Get your name on a couple strange mailing lists.<br>etc.</p><p>If the data becomes so worthless that they can't actually use it, they'll stop.  But only if enough of us go through with this.</p><p>When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You get such interesting stuff when it 's way off.I recently picked up , at a going out of business sale , a piece of jewelry that was normally $ 1200 for less than $ 200.Since then , I 've gotten several high end credit card offers , none of which I would normally qualify for.So mess with the system.Use your grocery store card... but only when buying beef jerkey and toilet paper.Get your name on a couple strange mailing lists.etc.If the data becomes so worthless that they ca n't actually use it , they 'll stop .
But only if enough of us go through with this.When the going gets weird , the weird turn pro .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You get such interesting stuff when it's way off.I recently picked up, at a going out of business sale, a piece of jewelry that was normally $1200 for less than $200.Since then, I've gotten several high end credit card offers, none of which I would normally qualify for.So mess with the system.Use your grocery store card... but only when buying beef jerkey and toilet paper.Get your name on a couple strange mailing lists.etc.If the data becomes so worthless that they can't actually use it, they'll stop.
But only if enough of us go through with this.When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31032402</id>
	<title>parent protection</title>
	<author>aerton</author>
	<datestamp>1265362800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This might be good, actually.<br> <br>
Now we know to avoid MS, and and for others it's forbidden.<br>
Unless they secretly acquire a license.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This might be good , actually .
Now we know to avoid MS , and and for others it 's forbidden .
Unless they secretly acquire a license .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This might be good, actually.
Now we know to avoid MS, and and for others it's forbidden.
Unless they secretly acquire a license.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025880</id>
	<title>Re:Bing is supposedly better than Google, rememebe</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265316660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're probably too busy loving every minute of using Windows 7 while sitting on their iPhone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're probably too busy loving every minute of using Windows 7 while sitting on their iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're probably too busy loving every minute of using Windows 7 while sitting on their iPhone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31028382</id>
	<title>no innovation</title>
	<author>pydev</author>
	<datestamp>1265285220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The people on this patent should be ashamed; there is no innovation contained in it, only an attempt at a patent land-grab.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The people on this patent should be ashamed ; there is no innovation contained in it , only an attempt at a patent land-grab .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The people on this patent should be ashamed; there is no innovation contained in it, only an attempt at a patent land-grab.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024448</id>
	<title>There's only one thing to say</title>
	<author>c0d3g33k</author>
	<datestamp>1265308980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fuck. That. Shit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck .
That. Shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck.
That. Shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31029394</id>
	<title>Re:He wants to recreate you virtually!!</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1265291220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... and then he will use your virtual avatar and put it into a military robot... we know where that goes!</p></div><p>Into an awful TV series with extremely irritating protagonists?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... and then he will use your virtual avatar and put it into a military robot... we know where that goes ! Into an awful TV series with extremely irritating protagonists ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... and then he will use your virtual avatar and put it into a military robot... we know where that goes!Into an awful TV series with extremely irritating protagonists?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025472</id>
	<title>Re:One note about data mining...</title>
	<author>Wiarumas</author>
	<datestamp>1265314020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or, you fool nobody and you receive spam/junk from all of the above.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , you fool nobody and you receive spam/junk from all of the above .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, you fool nobody and you receive spam/junk from all of the above.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024590</id>
	<title>Not for bill</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265309700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>He needs YOUR privacy to be gone. That is why he has been mining the info for MANY MANY years off of the PCs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He needs YOUR privacy to be gone .
That is why he has been mining the info for MANY MANY years off of the PCs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He needs YOUR privacy to be gone.
That is why he has been mining the info for MANY MANY years off of the PCs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024686</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>ascari</author>
	<datestamp>1265310120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nope. Considering how many people are willing to give up personal data for a chance to win a $100.00 gift card or some free iTunes, it doesn't appear to be the case.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope .
Considering how many people are willing to give up personal data for a chance to win a $ 100.00 gift card or some free iTunes , it does n't appear to be the case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope.
Considering how many people are willing to give up personal data for a chance to win a $100.00 gift card or some free iTunes, it doesn't appear to be the case.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31032808</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1265368140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only available if you're a winner ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only available if you 're a winner ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only available if you're a winner ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025794</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265316240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had a temporary parsing error on your post there.  I first interpreted "beat Bill" as "pummel Bill."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had a temporary parsing error on your post there .
I first interpreted " beat Bill " as " pummel Bill .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had a temporary parsing error on your post there.
I first interpreted "beat Bill" as "pummel Bill.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026380</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>StuartHankins</author>
	<datestamp>1265275440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>At this point, I'd be willing to pay Bill Gates if he offers to secure all my personal data.</p></div><p>Yeah, because Microsoft has such a <em>great</em> track record when it comes to security. And when this honeypot of user data is cracked a week or two from now, all we'd hear is the excuse from the MS fanboys saying "but it's the largest compilation of user data, of course it will have people cracking it successfully. If &lt;name\_of\_other\_company&gt; had a bigger marketshare, they would be a target too."<br> <br>No. And hell no. I hope you're 'turfing and not really that naive. I will go anon (as Lumpy suggests elsewhere in this thread) before I give private data to MS for "safekeeping".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>At this point , I 'd be willing to pay Bill Gates if he offers to secure all my personal data.Yeah , because Microsoft has such a great track record when it comes to security .
And when this honeypot of user data is cracked a week or two from now , all we 'd hear is the excuse from the MS fanboys saying " but it 's the largest compilation of user data , of course it will have people cracking it successfully .
If had a bigger marketshare , they would be a target too .
" No .
And hell no .
I hope you 're 'turfing and not really that naive .
I will go anon ( as Lumpy suggests elsewhere in this thread ) before I give private data to MS for " safekeeping " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At this point, I'd be willing to pay Bill Gates if he offers to secure all my personal data.Yeah, because Microsoft has such a great track record when it comes to security.
And when this honeypot of user data is cracked a week or two from now, all we'd hear is the excuse from the MS fanboys saying "but it's the largest compilation of user data, of course it will have people cracking it successfully.
If  had a bigger marketshare, they would be a target too.
" No.
And hell no.
I hope you're 'turfing and not really that naive.
I will go anon (as Lumpy suggests elsewhere in this thread) before I give private data to MS for "safekeeping".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024370</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265308740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How do you figure? I could see a very high quality of life where you have very little privacy.</p><p>Perhaps you should take a moment to define what sets the quality of your life - I define it by clean drinking water, warm shelter, and having access to entertainment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you figure ?
I could see a very high quality of life where you have very little privacy.Perhaps you should take a moment to define what sets the quality of your life - I define it by clean drinking water , warm shelter , and having access to entertainment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you figure?
I could see a very high quality of life where you have very little privacy.Perhaps you should take a moment to define what sets the quality of your life - I define it by clean drinking water, warm shelter, and having access to entertainment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025254</id>
	<title>Monetization for everyone</title>
	<author>five40kix</author>
	<datestamp>1265312820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the companies weren't so greedy and allowed us to get a small piece of the pie, I'm sure everyone would be happy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the companies were n't so greedy and allowed us to get a small piece of the pie , I 'm sure everyone would be happy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the companies weren't so greedy and allowed us to get a small piece of the pie, I'm sure everyone would be happy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024526</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265309400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Not for everyone.</p><p>The way to combat this is to kill the monetization component. The way to do that is to beat Bill to the punch and give all your data to everyone before he does, so they have to motivation to buy it.</p></div><p>Another way to combat this is to gather such information on Gates, other high-profile corporate figures, and politicians.  Then publically post them onto highly visible Web sites.  I mean after all, they think no privacy is such a great idea, right?  Let them be the pioneers.
<br> <br>
Like the notion that if the average Congressman knew that he had to depend on Social Security for his retirement, it would have been fixed (i.e. made sustainable) a long time ago.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not for everyone.The way to combat this is to kill the monetization component .
The way to do that is to beat Bill to the punch and give all your data to everyone before he does , so they have to motivation to buy it.Another way to combat this is to gather such information on Gates , other high-profile corporate figures , and politicians .
Then publically post them onto highly visible Web sites .
I mean after all , they think no privacy is such a great idea , right ?
Let them be the pioneers .
Like the notion that if the average Congressman knew that he had to depend on Social Security for his retirement , it would have been fixed ( i.e .
made sustainable ) a long time ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not for everyone.The way to combat this is to kill the monetization component.
The way to do that is to beat Bill to the punch and give all your data to everyone before he does, so they have to motivation to buy it.Another way to combat this is to gather such information on Gates, other high-profile corporate figures, and politicians.
Then publically post them onto highly visible Web sites.
I mean after all, they think no privacy is such a great idea, right?
Let them be the pioneers.
Like the notion that if the average Congressman knew that he had to depend on Social Security for his retirement, it would have been fixed (i.e.
made sustainable) a long time ago.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025230</id>
	<title>Bing is supposedly better than Google, rememeber?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265312700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where are all the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. posters who've said the past few months that everyone should move to Bing over Google, because Google is the evil behemoth that doesn't respect your privacy?</p><p>I'm just curious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where are all the / .
posters who 've said the past few months that everyone should move to Bing over Google , because Google is the evil behemoth that does n't respect your privacy ? I 'm just curious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where are all the /.
posters who've said the past few months that everyone should move to Bing over Google, because Google is the evil behemoth that doesn't respect your privacy?I'm just curious.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024502</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>megamerican</author>
	<datestamp>1265309280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place,</p></div><p>-Eric Schmidt, Google CEO.</p><p>I'm guessing Google has prior art for all of this. Although Google claims all of the information it has on you is for serving you ads, I've yet to see an ad that didn't have something to do with what was being searched for at the time.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you have something that you do n't want anyone to know , maybe you should n't be doing it in the first place,-Eric Schmidt , Google CEO.I 'm guessing Google has prior art for all of this .
Although Google claims all of the information it has on you is for serving you ads , I 've yet to see an ad that did n't have something to do with what was being searched for at the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place,-Eric Schmidt, Google CEO.I'm guessing Google has prior art for all of this.
Although Google claims all of the information it has on you is for serving you ads, I've yet to see an ad that didn't have something to do with what was being searched for at the time.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024666</id>
	<title>Bender just loves hookers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265310060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You seem to be referencing the episode of Futurerama(sp?) where Bender is visiting the moon. Bender is suggesting they start their own moon theme park, 'with blackjack and hookers', only to pause and add that the blackjack isn't really essential.
<br> <br>
Ironic, no?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You seem to be referencing the episode of Futurerama ( sp ?
) where Bender is visiting the moon .
Bender is suggesting they start their own moon theme park , 'with blackjack and hookers ' , only to pause and add that the blackjack is n't really essential .
Ironic , no ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You seem to be referencing the episode of Futurerama(sp?
) where Bender is visiting the moon.
Bender is suggesting they start their own moon theme park, 'with blackjack and hookers', only to pause and add that the blackjack isn't really essential.
Ironic, no?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025280</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>homey of my owney</author>
	<datestamp>1265313000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>More accurately, shouldn't the heading read "Bill gates wants to sell what you did last summer?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>More accurately , should n't the heading read " Bill gates wants to sell what you did last summer ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More accurately, shouldn't the heading read "Bill gates wants to sell what you did last summer?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025406</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>jgagnon</author>
	<datestamp>1265313720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You want a face card and an ace in the hole?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You want a face card and an ace in the hole ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You want a face card and an ace in the hole?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31028344</id>
	<title>no patent, prior art exists</title>
	<author>swschrad</author>
	<datestamp>1265285040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>just ask any botnet operator.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>just ask any botnet operator .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just ask any botnet operator.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024856</id>
	<title>anything Google isn't doing already ?</title>
	<author>obarthelemy</author>
	<datestamp>1265310960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>would be kinda funny if MS came up with an original idea ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>would be kinda funny if MS came up with an original idea ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>would be kinda funny if MS came up with an original idea ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026254</id>
	<title>Re:Bing is supposedly better than Google, rememebe</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265274960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At the time, I thought it might be a bunch of shills, since the pro-MS / counter-MS posts weren't following the usual pattern. It's entirely normal to see occasional pro-MS posts, but it's not normal to see LOTS of them at once, and it's very very suggestive to see lots of them concurrent with a marketing blitz.</p><p>It's also very very suggestive to see the posting rates collapse back to normal concurrent with the end of a marketing blitz.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At the time , I thought it might be a bunch of shills , since the pro-MS / counter-MS posts were n't following the usual pattern .
It 's entirely normal to see occasional pro-MS posts , but it 's not normal to see LOTS of them at once , and it 's very very suggestive to see lots of them concurrent with a marketing blitz.It 's also very very suggestive to see the posting rates collapse back to normal concurrent with the end of a marketing blitz .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At the time, I thought it might be a bunch of shills, since the pro-MS / counter-MS posts weren't following the usual pattern.
It's entirely normal to see occasional pro-MS posts, but it's not normal to see LOTS of them at once, and it's very very suggestive to see lots of them concurrent with a marketing blitz.It's also very very suggestive to see the posting rates collapse back to normal concurrent with the end of a marketing blitz.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024432</id>
	<title>And Microsoft Loses to Google AGAIN!</title>
	<author>RobotRunAmok</author>
	<datestamp>1265308920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Come on, Bill, what's all this "Ask" crap about?  In a Man's World, you just take someone's data, you don't "Ask" like some panty-waist privacy advocate!  You think Sergey Brin would "ask" before he takes my data?  Hell, no!  Sergey will just take it, sell it to the NSA, and then create an Android app that will let me dial in and get it back again -- for a fee.</p><p>Seriously, Bill... first combating world hunger, then curing disease, and now ASKing me before you breach my privacy?  You're getting soft.  Time to turn that Borg implant in your Slashdot avatar over to Sergey, I'm afraid...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on , Bill , what 's all this " Ask " crap about ?
In a Man 's World , you just take someone 's data , you do n't " Ask " like some panty-waist privacy advocate !
You think Sergey Brin would " ask " before he takes my data ?
Hell , no !
Sergey will just take it , sell it to the NSA , and then create an Android app that will let me dial in and get it back again -- for a fee.Seriously , Bill... first combating world hunger , then curing disease , and now ASKing me before you breach my privacy ?
You 're getting soft .
Time to turn that Borg implant in your Slashdot avatar over to Sergey , I 'm afraid.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on, Bill, what's all this "Ask" crap about?
In a Man's World, you just take someone's data, you don't "Ask" like some panty-waist privacy advocate!
You think Sergey Brin would "ask" before he takes my data?
Hell, no!
Sergey will just take it, sell it to the NSA, and then create an Android app that will let me dial in and get it back again -- for a fee.Seriously, Bill... first combating world hunger, then curing disease, and now ASKing me before you breach my privacy?
You're getting soft.
Time to turn that Borg implant in your Slashdot avatar over to Sergey, I'm afraid...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31029300</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1265290560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Whenever privacy is discussed around here, we say "wouldn't it be great if we could retain personal control over our data, and could willingly decide whom to sell our data to?"</p></div><p>I don't say that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whenever privacy is discussed around here , we say " would n't it be great if we could retain personal control over our data , and could willingly decide whom to sell our data to ?
" I do n't say that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whenever privacy is discussed around here, we say "wouldn't it be great if we could retain personal control over our data, and could willingly decide whom to sell our data to?
"I don't say that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31029688</id>
	<title>Re:What did I do last summer?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265292840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He can tell you where to get your weed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He can tell you where to get your weed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He can tell you where to get your weed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024422</id>
	<title>He wants to recreate you virtually!!</title>
	<author>vivin</author>
	<datestamp>1265308920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i> 'pictures, videos, documents, e-mail, instant messages, addresses, calendar dates/scheduling information (e.g., birthdays, anniversaries, appointments), voice mail, phone logs, RSS feeds, subscriptions, bookmarks, mail lists, project management features, computing device data, tasks and location data,</i> <br>
&nbsp; <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and then he will use your virtual avatar and put it into a military robot... we know where that goes!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'pictures , videos , documents , e-mail , instant messages , addresses , calendar dates/scheduling information ( e.g. , birthdays , anniversaries , appointments ) , voice mail , phone logs , RSS feeds , subscriptions , bookmarks , mail lists , project management features , computing device data , tasks and location data ,   ... and then he will use your virtual avatar and put it into a military robot... we know where that goes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> 'pictures, videos, documents, e-mail, instant messages, addresses, calendar dates/scheduling information (e.g., birthdays, anniversaries, appointments), voice mail, phone logs, RSS feeds, subscriptions, bookmarks, mail lists, project management features, computing device data, tasks and location data, 
   ... and then he will use your virtual avatar and put it into a military robot... we know where that goes!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025082</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265311980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How so? Privacy affects quality of life, but I don't see how hookers affect blackjack unless the hooker is dealing.</p><p>I thought you were joking, but since the mods didn't thing so I'm confused?</p><p>A thought: hookers and winning at blackjack affect the quality of life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How so ?
Privacy affects quality of life , but I do n't see how hookers affect blackjack unless the hooker is dealing.I thought you were joking , but since the mods did n't thing so I 'm confused ? A thought : hookers and winning at blackjack affect the quality of life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How so?
Privacy affects quality of life, but I don't see how hookers affect blackjack unless the hooker is dealing.I thought you were joking, but since the mods didn't thing so I'm confused?A thought: hookers and winning at blackjack affect the quality of life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31029478</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>osobear</author>
	<datestamp>1265291700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So know someone with a great deal of economic leverage is trying to push exactly such a system, and <b>all</b> of slashdot goes<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>Congratulations, GP (Hijacked Public), you speak for all of Slashdot.  Well done.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So know someone with a great deal of economic leverage is trying to push exactly such a system , and all of slashdot goes ...Congratulations , GP ( Hijacked Public ) , you speak for all of Slashdot .
Well done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So know someone with a great deal of economic leverage is trying to push exactly such a system, and all of slashdot goes ...Congratulations, GP (Hijacked Public), you speak for all of Slashdot.
Well done.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025680</id>
	<title>Re:There's only one thing to say</title>
	<author>Coach Buzzcut</author>
	<datestamp>1265315460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is this comment not modded all the way up?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is this comment not modded all the way up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is this comment not modded all the way up?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026680</id>
	<title>Re:Bing is supposedly better than Google, rememebe</title>
	<author>DavidWeight</author>
	<datestamp>1265276640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fortunately none of them can find Slashdot any more...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fortunately none of them can find Slashdot any more.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fortunately none of them can find Slashdot any more...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024310</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>Gerafix</author>
	<datestamp>1265308500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Privacy is to quality of life as hookers are to blackjack.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Privacy is to quality of life as hookers are to blackjack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Privacy is to quality of life as hookers are to blackjack.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024356</id>
	<title>Title Correction:  The N.S.A. Knows What You Did</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265308680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>today after Microsoft partners with the N.S.A. for "help" to<br>stop the "China hackers".</p><p>Encrypt EVERYTHING.</p><p>That's all for now , hackerz.</p><p>Yours In Minsk,<br>Kilgore Trout</p><p>P.S.:</p><p>010001100111010101100011011010110010000001000010011101010111001101101000</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>today after Microsoft partners with the N.S.A .
for " help " tostop the " China hackers " .Encrypt EVERYTHING.That 's all for now , hackerz.Yours In Minsk,Kilgore TroutP.S .
: 010001100111010101100011011010110010000001000010011101010111001101101000</tokentext>
<sentencetext>today after Microsoft partners with the N.S.A.
for "help" tostop the "China hackers".Encrypt EVERYTHING.That's all for now , hackerz.Yours In Minsk,Kilgore TroutP.S.
:010001100111010101100011011010110010000001000010011101010111001101101000</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024926</id>
	<title>If only UFO aliens would abduct Billly</title>
	<author>uassholes</author>
	<datestamp>1265311260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Give him anal probes for 70 years, then inject him into Uranus.
</p><p>Even better for life on Earth is if they would go back in time and do it 30 years ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Give him anal probes for 70 years , then inject him into Uranus .
Even better for life on Earth is if they would go back in time and do it 30 years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give him anal probes for 70 years, then inject him into Uranus.
Even better for life on Earth is if they would go back in time and do it 30 years ago.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024534</id>
	<title>No</title>
	<author>spun</author>
	<datestamp>1265309460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Privacy is not essential to a high quality of life. Having other people merely know everything you do will not decrease your quality of life. To do that, others would have to act on that information in a way that hurts you. If you are confidant that others can not use personal information against you, then there is no need for privacy. For instance, if everyone knew everything about everyone, then everyone would know that someone was using your information against you, and could act against that person.</p><p>However, your question does not really address the situation in the article. We all share information with others. If we choose to do so, it is in no way a breach of our privacy. This patent outlines an 'opt-in' method, meaning, there is no breach of privacy, in theory.</p><p>However, I am picturing this in action, and the only recommendation I can see a system like this making to people, based on their personal information and the fact that this would be Bilgatus of Borg and the Microsoft Collective producing the software, is: "We think you would enjoy dropping your trousers, bending over, and presenting your lubed up butt hole to Microsoft." So, in practice, I do see this reducing people's quality of life rather than improving it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Privacy is not essential to a high quality of life .
Having other people merely know everything you do will not decrease your quality of life .
To do that , others would have to act on that information in a way that hurts you .
If you are confidant that others can not use personal information against you , then there is no need for privacy .
For instance , if everyone knew everything about everyone , then everyone would know that someone was using your information against you , and could act against that person.However , your question does not really address the situation in the article .
We all share information with others .
If we choose to do so , it is in no way a breach of our privacy .
This patent outlines an 'opt-in ' method , meaning , there is no breach of privacy , in theory.However , I am picturing this in action , and the only recommendation I can see a system like this making to people , based on their personal information and the fact that this would be Bilgatus of Borg and the Microsoft Collective producing the software , is : " We think you would enjoy dropping your trousers , bending over , and presenting your lubed up butt hole to Microsoft .
" So , in practice , I do see this reducing people 's quality of life rather than improving it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Privacy is not essential to a high quality of life.
Having other people merely know everything you do will not decrease your quality of life.
To do that, others would have to act on that information in a way that hurts you.
If you are confidant that others can not use personal information against you, then there is no need for privacy.
For instance, if everyone knew everything about everyone, then everyone would know that someone was using your information against you, and could act against that person.However, your question does not really address the situation in the article.
We all share information with others.
If we choose to do so, it is in no way a breach of our privacy.
This patent outlines an 'opt-in' method, meaning, there is no breach of privacy, in theory.However, I am picturing this in action, and the only recommendation I can see a system like this making to people, based on their personal information and the fact that this would be Bilgatus of Borg and the Microsoft Collective producing the software, is: "We think you would enjoy dropping your trousers, bending over, and presenting your lubed up butt hole to Microsoft.
" So, in practice, I do see this reducing people's quality of life rather than improving it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024748</id>
	<title>surprised</title>
	<author>crsuperman34</author>
	<datestamp>1265310360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...and you're surprised why? Afterall, he can be considered a brilliant ruthless pioneering cut-throat rober baron of the 21st century.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and you 're surprised why ?
Afterall , he can be considered a brilliant ruthless pioneering cut-throat rober baron of the 21st century .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and you're surprised why?
Afterall, he can be considered a brilliant ruthless pioneering cut-throat rober baron of the 21st century.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024698</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>DancesWithBlowTorch</author>
	<datestamp>1265310180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Okay, I'm confused. Whenever privacy is discussed around here, we say "wouldn't it be great if we could retain personal control over our data, and could willingly decide whom to <i>sell</i> our data to?"<br>
<br>
So know someone with a great deal of economic leverage is trying to push exactly such a system, and all of slashdot goes "Oh my god, how evil! Quick, everyone give your data away for free, so nobody can monetize them any more, not even yourself!"
<br> <br>
Guys, Bill Gates stopped being the most evil man about five years ago. I care much less about the shortcomings of Windows than I care about Google and Facebook knowing more about me than I do myself. At this point, I'd be willing to <i>pay</i> Bill Gates if he offers to secure all my personal data.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay , I 'm confused .
Whenever privacy is discussed around here , we say " would n't it be great if we could retain personal control over our data , and could willingly decide whom to sell our data to ?
" So know someone with a great deal of economic leverage is trying to push exactly such a system , and all of slashdot goes " Oh my god , how evil !
Quick , everyone give your data away for free , so nobody can monetize them any more , not even yourself !
" Guys , Bill Gates stopped being the most evil man about five years ago .
I care much less about the shortcomings of Windows than I care about Google and Facebook knowing more about me than I do myself .
At this point , I 'd be willing to pay Bill Gates if he offers to secure all my personal data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay, I'm confused.
Whenever privacy is discussed around here, we say "wouldn't it be great if we could retain personal control over our data, and could willingly decide whom to sell our data to?
"

So know someone with a great deal of economic leverage is trying to push exactly such a system, and all of slashdot goes "Oh my god, how evil!
Quick, everyone give your data away for free, so nobody can monetize them any more, not even yourself!
"
 
Guys, Bill Gates stopped being the most evil man about five years ago.
I care much less about the shortcomings of Windows than I care about Google and Facebook knowing more about me than I do myself.
At this point, I'd be willing to pay Bill Gates if he offers to secure all my personal data.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31031632</id>
	<title>Re:One note about data mining...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265309160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Use your grocery store card... but only when buying beef jerkey and toilet paper.</i> </p><p>Actually, I find grocery store cards to be the one place where I get some value for the information I give up.</p><p>However, in my case, it's really not my info -- I think I have a blank card. I once forgot mine and said I couldn't remember the phone number it was associated with. The clerk handed me a card off the counter and said to take that one. If I use a CC with it, they say my name. If I don't, they look a little surprised when they say, "Thank you<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... uh<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Valued Customer."</p><p>Anyway, I routinely get 15\% to 45\% knocked off my bill. Average is between 20\% and 25\%. I can't see turning that down so it can go directly to their bottom line.</p><p>The part that really pisses me off, though, is what happens when union contract negotiations come up. The union asks foe a few measly percent raise or not such a deep cut in health benefits. But management always throw their jazz hands up in the air and start chanting, "Raaaaazor thin margins -- raaaaazor thin margins". The fuckers can find a way to give me and probably 95\% of their shoppers 25\% off on our tabs, but they can't find a dime for the employees who keep the place running. I'd happily give up the discounts if I could be sure all the money went directly to the wages of the grunts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Use your grocery store card... but only when buying beef jerkey and toilet paper .
Actually , I find grocery store cards to be the one place where I get some value for the information I give up.However , in my case , it 's really not my info -- I think I have a blank card .
I once forgot mine and said I could n't remember the phone number it was associated with .
The clerk handed me a card off the counter and said to take that one .
If I use a CC with it , they say my name .
If I do n't , they look a little surprised when they say , " Thank you ... uh ... Valued Customer .
" Anyway , I routinely get 15 \ % to 45 \ % knocked off my bill .
Average is between 20 \ % and 25 \ % .
I ca n't see turning that down so it can go directly to their bottom line.The part that really pisses me off , though , is what happens when union contract negotiations come up .
The union asks foe a few measly percent raise or not such a deep cut in health benefits .
But management always throw their jazz hands up in the air and start chanting , " Raaaaazor thin margins -- raaaaazor thin margins " .
The fuckers can find a way to give me and probably 95 \ % of their shoppers 25 \ % off on our tabs , but they ca n't find a dime for the employees who keep the place running .
I 'd happily give up the discounts if I could be sure all the money went directly to the wages of the grunts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Use your grocery store card... but only when buying beef jerkey and toilet paper.
Actually, I find grocery store cards to be the one place where I get some value for the information I give up.However, in my case, it's really not my info -- I think I have a blank card.
I once forgot mine and said I couldn't remember the phone number it was associated with.
The clerk handed me a card off the counter and said to take that one.
If I use a CC with it, they say my name.
If I don't, they look a little surprised when they say, "Thank you ... uh ... Valued Customer.
"Anyway, I routinely get 15\% to 45\% knocked off my bill.
Average is between 20\% and 25\%.
I can't see turning that down so it can go directly to their bottom line.The part that really pisses me off, though, is what happens when union contract negotiations come up.
The union asks foe a few measly percent raise or not such a deep cut in health benefits.
But management always throw their jazz hands up in the air and start chanting, "Raaaaazor thin margins -- raaaaazor thin margins".
The fuckers can find a way to give me and probably 95\% of their shoppers 25\% off on our tabs, but they can't find a dime for the employees who keep the place running.
I'd happily give up the discounts if I could be sure all the money went directly to the wages of the grunts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025012</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026656</id>
	<title>Tell me what do you miss more and I'll teach you h</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265276520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>
F...g billionaire - he has too much time on his hands.</htmltext>
<tokenext>F...g billionaire - he has too much time on his hands .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
F...g billionaire - he has too much time on his hands.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024674</id>
	<title>awesome!</title>
	<author>MagicM</author>
	<datestamp>1265310060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's to hoping that they'll take anyone to court who tries to infringe on their patent!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's to hoping that they 'll take anyone to court who tries to infringe on their patent !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's to hoping that they'll take anyone to court who tries to infringe on their patent!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026790</id>
	<title>I'll give you even more...</title>
	<author>Asadullah Ahmad</author>
	<datestamp>1265277120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about I give him all my life including myself, and he gives me a million or so dollars. That ought to improve the quality of my life!</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about I give him all my life including myself , and he gives me a million or so dollars .
That ought to improve the quality of my life !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about I give him all my life including myself, and he gives me a million or so dollars.
That ought to improve the quality of my life!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024700</id>
	<title>Wait...</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1265310180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When they sell my info to the highest bidder, I get all the proceeds from that sale, since I'm the owner of the information, right? Couldn't somebody game the system by mass-creating virtual identities?</htmltext>
<tokenext>When they sell my info to the highest bidder , I get all the proceeds from that sale , since I 'm the owner of the information , right ?
Could n't somebody game the system by mass-creating virtual identities ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When they sell my info to the highest bidder, I get all the proceeds from that sale, since I'm the owner of the information, right?
Couldn't somebody game the system by mass-creating virtual identities?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31032578</id>
	<title>Perhaps more patent text should have been cited?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265365320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The monetization component 560 is communicatively coupled to the data capture component 510 and the interaction component 520 to facilitate retrieval of personal data and sale thereof. In particular, a user via the interaction component 520 can designate particular information for sale or alternatively protect certain information. Additionally, the user may designate to whom the information can be sold and how to will be used."</p><p>It's not like they're going to sell the information without your consent, as the article poster wants to imply...<br>But this is Slashdot, right? Die, M$!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The monetization component 560 is communicatively coupled to the data capture component 510 and the interaction component 520 to facilitate retrieval of personal data and sale thereof .
In particular , a user via the interaction component 520 can designate particular information for sale or alternatively protect certain information .
Additionally , the user may designate to whom the information can be sold and how to will be used .
" It 's not like they 're going to sell the information without your consent , as the article poster wants to imply...But this is Slashdot , right ?
Die , M $ !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The monetization component 560 is communicatively coupled to the data capture component 510 and the interaction component 520 to facilitate retrieval of personal data and sale thereof.
In particular, a user via the interaction component 520 can designate particular information for sale or alternatively protect certain information.
Additionally, the user may designate to whom the information can be sold and how to will be used.
"It's not like they're going to sell the information without your consent, as the article poster wants to imply...But this is Slashdot, right?
Die, M$!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026262</id>
	<title>Universal Business Patent</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265275020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i) Obtain something for the lowest price<br>ii) Sell for the highest price<br>iii) Profit.</p><p>Remember, you heard it here first.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i ) Obtain something for the lowest priceii ) Sell for the highest priceiii ) Profit.Remember , you heard it here first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i) Obtain something for the lowest priceii) Sell for the highest priceiii) Profit.Remember, you heard it here first.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024640</id>
	<title>Re:Title Correction: The N.S.A. Knows What You Did</title>
	<author>amicusNYCL</author>
	<datestamp>1265309940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>today after Microsoft partners with the N.S.A. for "help" to<br>stop the "China hackers".</p></div><p>That was Google wanting to partner, not Microsoft.  Keep trusting Google and fearing Microsoft, though.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>today after Microsoft partners with the N.S.A .
for " help " tostop the " China hackers " .That was Google wanting to partner , not Microsoft .
Keep trusting Google and fearing Microsoft , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>today after Microsoft partners with the N.S.A.
for "help" tostop the "China hackers".That was Google wanting to partner, not Microsoft.
Keep trusting Google and fearing Microsoft, though.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024462</id>
	<title>I also have a patent</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265309040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All Bill has to do is give me a book of signed, blank checks and I will improve his 'quality of life'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All Bill has to do is give me a book of signed , blank checks and I will improve his 'quality of life' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All Bill has to do is give me a book of signed, blank checks and I will improve his 'quality of life'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024654</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265310000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is not privacy essential to a high quality of life?</p></div><p>According to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/11/facebook-privacy" title="guardian.co.uk">Mark Zuckerberg</a> [guardian.co.uk], the answer is "no". The really sad part is that most of the general public will blithely go along with this asinine assertion.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is not privacy essential to a high quality of life ? According to Mark Zuckerberg [ guardian.co.uk ] , the answer is " no " .
The really sad part is that most of the general public will blithely go along with this asinine assertion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is not privacy essential to a high quality of life?According to Mark Zuckerberg [guardian.co.uk], the answer is "no".
The really sad part is that most of the general public will blithely go along with this asinine assertion.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025068</id>
	<title>What did I do last summer?</title>
	<author>harry666t</author>
	<datestamp>1265311920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was camping in a middle of a fucking forest with a herd of hippies, that's what I did.</p><p>So, how can you improve the quality of my life, mr. Gates? Can you give me a bigger forest? More hippies? Less villagers with pitchforks?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was camping in a middle of a fucking forest with a herd of hippies , that 's what I did.So , how can you improve the quality of my life , mr. Gates ? Can you give me a bigger forest ?
More hippies ?
Less villagers with pitchforks ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was camping in a middle of a fucking forest with a herd of hippies, that's what I did.So, how can you improve the quality of my life, mr. Gates? Can you give me a bigger forest?
More hippies?
Less villagers with pitchforks?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025208</id>
	<title>Re:Privacy</title>
	<author>gtall</author>
	<datestamp>1265312580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'Like the notion that if the average Congressman knew that he had to depend on Social Security for his retirement, it would have been fixed (i.e. made sustainable) a long time ago."</p><p>What have you been smoking? In Congress-Critters had to rely on SS, it would have been made insolvent long ago as they would have larded it up with baubles for "next of kin" which would have included first, second, and third cousins and the family cat. Remember, a Congress-Critter feels an election cycle has been wasted if s/he cannot claim to have brought home a "project" for the locals to yokel about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'Like the notion that if the average Congressman knew that he had to depend on Social Security for his retirement , it would have been fixed ( i.e .
made sustainable ) a long time ago .
" What have you been smoking ?
In Congress-Critters had to rely on SS , it would have been made insolvent long ago as they would have larded it up with baubles for " next of kin " which would have included first , second , and third cousins and the family cat .
Remember , a Congress-Critter feels an election cycle has been wasted if s/he can not claim to have brought home a " project " for the locals to yokel about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'Like the notion that if the average Congressman knew that he had to depend on Social Security for his retirement, it would have been fixed (i.e.
made sustainable) a long time ago.
"What have you been smoking?
In Congress-Critters had to rely on SS, it would have been made insolvent long ago as they would have larded it up with baubles for "next of kin" which would have included first, second, and third cousins and the family cat.
Remember, a Congress-Critter feels an election cycle has been wasted if s/he cannot claim to have brought home a "project" for the locals to yokel about.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025746</id>
	<title>bill's after my sandwich</title>
	<author>revboden</author>
	<datestamp>1265315880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good try Bill, Data mining... yea right...

Bill, You will never get your hands on my " Super Dagwood Sandwich" recipe...never...   never ever... mwhaah ahaha hahahah</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good try Bill , Data mining... yea right.. . Bill , You will never get your hands on my " Super Dagwood Sandwich " recipe...never... never ever... mwhaah ahaha hahahah</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good try Bill, Data mining... yea right...

Bill, You will never get your hands on my " Super Dagwood Sandwich" recipe...never...   never ever... mwhaah ahaha hahahah</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024590
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31032808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026254
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025406
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026150
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31029158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024370
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024278
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025236
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024370
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024370
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025208
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024370
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31027388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024348
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31029394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31031632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31027492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31029688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31029478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31028778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31029300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_04_1442214_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_04_1442214.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024422
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31029394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025904
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_04_1442214.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025236
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_04_1442214.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025880
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31028778
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026254
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026680
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_04_1442214.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024308
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_04_1442214.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024366
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_04_1442214.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024700
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_04_1442214.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024640
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_04_1442214.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024824
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_04_1442214.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024686
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024590
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024310
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024666
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31032808
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025118
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025082
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024288
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024698
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31029158
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025710
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31029478
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31029300
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026380
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025280
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026150
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024526
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026456
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31027492
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025208
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025368
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025794
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024534
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025310
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024370
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024754
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31027388
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025234
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024540
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024432
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024348
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_04_1442214.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024644
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_04_1442214.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31029688
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_04_1442214.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024462
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_04_1442214.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025382
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_04_1442214.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024990
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_04_1442214.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025680
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_04_1442214.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025012
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31026000
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025472
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31031632
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_04_1442214.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31025116
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_04_1442214.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_04_1442214.31024554
</commentlist>
</conversation>
