<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_02_1922218</id>
	<title>Spray-On Liquid Glass</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1265104620000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>bLanark writes with news of a new substance that can be sprayed on for a <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/7125556/Liquid-glass-the-spray-on-scientific-revelation.html">durable, easy-to-clean film on almost any substance</a>, hard or soft. The liquid glass is essentially pure silicon dioxide, and it goes on in a layer 15 to 30 atoms thick. It is breathable and flexible, but waterproof and resistant to bacterial growth. The patent is held by a German company, Nanopool, which is in discussion with many parties about a wide range of uses: keeping public spaces sanitary, keeping restaurants clean, and keeping cars or trains clean. <i>"The spray forms a water-resistant layer, meaning it can be cleaned using only water. Trials by food-processing companies showed that sterile surfaces covered with a film of liquid glass were equally clean after a rinse with hot water as after their usual treatment with strong bleach."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>bLanark writes with news of a new substance that can be sprayed on for a durable , easy-to-clean film on almost any substance , hard or soft .
The liquid glass is essentially pure silicon dioxide , and it goes on in a layer 15 to 30 atoms thick .
It is breathable and flexible , but waterproof and resistant to bacterial growth .
The patent is held by a German company , Nanopool , which is in discussion with many parties about a wide range of uses : keeping public spaces sanitary , keeping restaurants clean , and keeping cars or trains clean .
" The spray forms a water-resistant layer , meaning it can be cleaned using only water .
Trials by food-processing companies showed that sterile surfaces covered with a film of liquid glass were equally clean after a rinse with hot water as after their usual treatment with strong bleach .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bLanark writes with news of a new substance that can be sprayed on for a durable, easy-to-clean film on almost any substance, hard or soft.
The liquid glass is essentially pure silicon dioxide, and it goes on in a layer 15 to 30 atoms thick.
It is breathable and flexible, but waterproof and resistant to bacterial growth.
The patent is held by a German company, Nanopool, which is in discussion with many parties about a wide range of uses: keeping public spaces sanitary, keeping restaurants clean, and keeping cars or trains clean.
"The spray forms a water-resistant layer, meaning it can be cleaned using only water.
Trials by food-processing companies showed that sterile surfaces covered with a film of liquid glass were equally clean after a rinse with hot water as after their usual treatment with strong bleach.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002358</id>
	<title>Re:Think bigger</title>
	<author>grepdisc</author>
	<datestamp>1265111580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As we learned on <a href="http://www.tv.com/ducktales/the-unbreakable-bin/episode/342739/recap.html" title="tv.com" rel="nofollow">Duck Tales</a> [tv.com], no glass is ever completely unbreakable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As we learned on Duck Tales [ tv.com ] , no glass is ever completely unbreakable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As we learned on Duck Tales [tv.com], no glass is ever completely unbreakable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002320</id>
	<title>Re:But will it get you high when you snort it?</title>
	<author>gumbi west</author>
	<datestamp>1265111340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, but that is 0.0001 g/m3 * 1/60.0843 g/molecule * 6.02*10^23 molecues/mol = 10^18 molecules / cubic meter. at 10-30 atoms thick, and assuming a each molecule takes up about 10 pm square (is that right?) you get about 2*10^25 of atoms/meter. Wait, can that be right? I must have a bad assumption or math somewhere...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but that is 0.0001 g/m3 * 1/60.0843 g/molecule * 6.02 * 10 ^ 23 molecues/mol = 10 ^ 18 molecules / cubic meter .
at 10-30 atoms thick , and assuming a each molecule takes up about 10 pm square ( is that right ?
) you get about 2 * 10 ^ 25 of atoms/meter .
Wait , can that be right ?
I must have a bad assumption or math somewhere.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but that is 0.0001 g/m3 * 1/60.0843 g/molecule * 6.02*10^23 molecues/mol = 10^18 molecules / cubic meter.
at 10-30 atoms thick, and assuming a each molecule takes up about 10 pm square (is that right?
) you get about 2*10^25 of atoms/meter.
Wait, can that be right?
I must have a bad assumption or math somewhere...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31059008</id>
	<title>Re:winshield repair?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265623440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If the silicon dioxide found in "regular sand" was truly a health hazard, then every beach in California would be outlawed (or at least coated in warning stickers) telling you to keep away.  Hasn't ever happened, and never will, since casual exposure from playing in sand is not a silicosis hazard in any way.</p></div><p>This is especially impressive, given how eager this state is to slap a Prop 65 warning on just about anything. Even PG&amp;E is required to include a yearly notice in my bill stating that the natural gas they pipe into my home contains materials known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the silicon dioxide found in " regular sand " was truly a health hazard , then every beach in California would be outlawed ( or at least coated in warning stickers ) telling you to keep away .
Has n't ever happened , and never will , since casual exposure from playing in sand is not a silicosis hazard in any way.This is especially impressive , given how eager this state is to slap a Prop 65 warning on just about anything .
Even PG&amp;E is required to include a yearly notice in my bill stating that the natural gas they pipe into my home contains materials known to the State of California to cause cancer , birth defects , or other reproductive harm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the silicon dioxide found in "regular sand" was truly a health hazard, then every beach in California would be outlawed (or at least coated in warning stickers) telling you to keep away.
Hasn't ever happened, and never will, since casual exposure from playing in sand is not a silicosis hazard in any way.This is especially impressive, given how eager this state is to slap a Prop 65 warning on just about anything.
Even PG&amp;E is required to include a yearly notice in my bill stating that the natural gas they pipe into my home contains materials known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002334</id>
	<title>Re:winshield repair?</title>
	<author>Jane Q. Public</author>
	<datestamp>1265111460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Um... and so are your windows, and your drinking glasses, and your computer and television screens, and mirrors, and a plethora of other items in the home.
<br> <br>
Your point? (I would assume that people would take precautions to avoid breathing the stuff as they spray.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Um... and so are your windows , and your drinking glasses , and your computer and television screens , and mirrors , and a plethora of other items in the home .
Your point ?
( I would assume that people would take precautions to avoid breathing the stuff as they spray .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um... and so are your windows, and your drinking glasses, and your computer and television screens, and mirrors, and a plethora of other items in the home.
Your point?
(I would assume that people would take precautions to avoid breathing the stuff as they spray.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31006722</id>
	<title>Re:Think bigger</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264968240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Forget your windshield, think YOUR ENTIRE CAR!</p><p>No more clear coats, no more waxing, no more "rubberized under coating". If it is cheap, and light enough, you could coat every body panel and frame member with the stuff, virtually guarantying a rust proof existence.</p><p>-Rick</p></div><p>Also would decrease air resistance on even surfaces.  Therefore higher gas mileage and higher top speed.</p><p>This would be great on planes as well, keeping the dust off of the wings.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Forget your windshield , think YOUR ENTIRE CAR ! No more clear coats , no more waxing , no more " rubberized under coating " .
If it is cheap , and light enough , you could coat every body panel and frame member with the stuff , virtually guarantying a rust proof existence.-RickAlso would decrease air resistance on even surfaces .
Therefore higher gas mileage and higher top speed.This would be great on planes as well , keeping the dust off of the wings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forget your windshield, think YOUR ENTIRE CAR!No more clear coats, no more waxing, no more "rubberized under coating".
If it is cheap, and light enough, you could coat every body panel and frame member with the stuff, virtually guarantying a rust proof existence.-RickAlso would decrease air resistance on even surfaces.
Therefore higher gas mileage and higher top speed.This would be great on planes as well, keeping the dust off of the wings.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002556</id>
	<title>I, for one,....</title>
	<author>mythunderstood</author>
	<datestamp>1265112780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>... welcome our transparent waterproof 15 to 30 atoms thick overlords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... welcome our transparent waterproof 15 to 30 atoms thick overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... welcome our transparent waterproof 15 to 30 atoms thick overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002392</id>
	<title>Re:All glass is liquid</title>
	<author>NeutronCowboy</author>
	<datestamp>1265111760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, it merely demonstrates that those selected for moderation can be subject to various incorrect assumptions, biases or asshat inclinations.</p><p>Can we now get off the idea that moderation is anything but "Someone finds me interesting,informative, trollish" etc.?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it merely demonstrates that those selected for moderation can be subject to various incorrect assumptions , biases or asshat inclinations.Can we now get off the idea that moderation is anything but " Someone finds me interesting,informative , trollish " etc .
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it merely demonstrates that those selected for moderation can be subject to various incorrect assumptions, biases or asshat inclinations.Can we now get off the idea that moderation is anything but "Someone finds me interesting,informative, trollish" etc.
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001828</id>
	<title>All glass is liquid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265108580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Technicaly all glass is liquid. IAAC (I am a chemist)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Technicaly all glass is liquid .
IAAC ( I am a chemist )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Technicaly all glass is liquid.
IAAC (I am a chemist)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002842</id>
	<title>Re:No information</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1265114400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So, just exactly what <i>is</i> it?</p></div><p>I dunno, but it sounds pretty magical <i>and</i> revolutionary, if you ask me.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , just exactly what is it ? I dunno , but it sounds pretty magical and revolutionary , if you ask me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, just exactly what is it?I dunno, but it sounds pretty magical and revolutionary, if you ask me.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31010674</id>
	<title>Re:winshield repair?</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1264957200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Hasn't ever happened, and never will, since that would ruin the tourist industry.</p><p>Not saying you're wrong about the health details, just pointing out that monetary incentives have a history of being seen as rather more important.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Has n't ever happened , and never will , since that would ruin the tourist industry.Not saying you 're wrong about the health details , just pointing out that monetary incentives have a history of being seen as rather more important .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Hasn't ever happened, and never will, since that would ruin the tourist industry.Not saying you're wrong about the health details, just pointing out that monetary incentives have a history of being seen as rather more important.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002630</id>
	<title>Re:All glass is liquid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265113260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You may be a chemist, but you are certainly mistaken.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You may be a chemist , but you are certainly mistaken .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You may be a chemist, but you are certainly mistaken.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001828</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002778</id>
	<title>Obvious application as CD repair fluid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265114040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This stuff sounds like it has obvious applications as a repair medium for scratched compact discs. As long as the scratches are not uber deep (or have been buffed off really well with a disc buffer), this stuff should be able to fill very tiny and superficial scuffs and scratches, and return the disc's surface to a nice transparent gloss.</p><p>As an added bonus, it should make the surface less prone to being scratched again.</p><p>I could easily see this being sold as an optical media repair fluid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This stuff sounds like it has obvious applications as a repair medium for scratched compact discs .
As long as the scratches are not uber deep ( or have been buffed off really well with a disc buffer ) , this stuff should be able to fill very tiny and superficial scuffs and scratches , and return the disc 's surface to a nice transparent gloss.As an added bonus , it should make the surface less prone to being scratched again.I could easily see this being sold as an optical media repair fluid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This stuff sounds like it has obvious applications as a repair medium for scratched compact discs.
As long as the scratches are not uber deep (or have been buffed off really well with a disc buffer), this stuff should be able to fill very tiny and superficial scuffs and scratches, and return the disc's surface to a nice transparent gloss.As an added bonus, it should make the surface less prone to being scratched again.I could easily see this being sold as an optical media repair fluid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002644</id>
	<title>Clean with distilled water I assume</title>
	<author>Alain Williams</author>
	<datestamp>1265113320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you were to use tap water where I live (hard water area), you would quickly end up with a smear of limescale on the surface. So you would need to clean (or at least rinse) with distilled water.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you were to use tap water where I live ( hard water area ) , you would quickly end up with a smear of limescale on the surface .
So you would need to clean ( or at least rinse ) with distilled water .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you were to use tap water where I live (hard water area), you would quickly end up with a smear of limescale on the surface.
So you would need to clean (or at least rinse) with distilled water.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003010</id>
	<title>Re:Anti-graffiti?</title>
	<author>cenc</author>
	<datestamp>1265115180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Better yet, Graffiti artist can now insure that their work is never removed. It will be an arms race to see who gets to the surface first.</p><p>Question comes to mind from that however. Can you spray this stuff on, paint on top of it, then spray another coat to make it permanent?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Better yet , Graffiti artist can now insure that their work is never removed .
It will be an arms race to see who gets to the surface first.Question comes to mind from that however .
Can you spray this stuff on , paint on top of it , then spray another coat to make it permanent ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better yet, Graffiti artist can now insure that their work is never removed.
It will be an arms race to see who gets to the surface first.Question comes to mind from that however.
Can you spray this stuff on, paint on top of it, then spray another coat to make it permanent?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001952</id>
	<title>pulmonary fibrosis &amp; silicosis risks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265109360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just as asbestos is a great product *for select applications* so is "glass." IMO, this sounds like a horrible idea.<br>Have the inventors never heard of Silicon Fibrosis? Due to abrasion Si fibers go airborne, where they imbed in the lungs and abrade, causing eventual cancer. Go have a look at the MSDS sheets. It's a nasty way to die.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just as asbestos is a great product * for select applications * so is " glass .
" IMO , this sounds like a horrible idea.Have the inventors never heard of Silicon Fibrosis ?
Due to abrasion Si fibers go airborne , where they imbed in the lungs and abrade , causing eventual cancer .
Go have a look at the MSDS sheets .
It 's a nasty way to die .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just as asbestos is a great product *for select applications* so is "glass.
" IMO, this sounds like a horrible idea.Have the inventors never heard of Silicon Fibrosis?
Due to abrasion Si fibers go airborne, where they imbed in the lungs and abrade, causing eventual cancer.
Go have a look at the MSDS sheets.
It's a nasty way to die.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002234</id>
	<title>Instant Whiteboard Anywhere</title>
	<author>wonkavader</author>
	<datestamp>1265110860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally, I can make my life size cut out of Colonel Sanders white-board marker safe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , I can make my life size cut out of Colonel Sanders white-board marker safe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, I can make my life size cut out of Colonel Sanders white-board marker safe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007012</id>
	<title>Re:bleach is great but focus on antibiotics</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264971180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No one has yet noted that this stuff will be a cheap and easy way to create aerosolized anthrax, which previously required special silicon coating equipment, that only the military had, to cover anthrax bacteria to keep them from clumping. I think this is bad news because it makes it a lot easier to make bioweapons.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No one has yet noted that this stuff will be a cheap and easy way to create aerosolized anthrax , which previously required special silicon coating equipment , that only the military had , to cover anthrax bacteria to keep them from clumping .
I think this is bad news because it makes it a lot easier to make bioweapons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No one has yet noted that this stuff will be a cheap and easy way to create aerosolized anthrax, which previously required special silicon coating equipment, that only the military had, to cover anthrax bacteria to keep them from clumping.
I think this is bad news because it makes it a lot easier to make bioweapons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002802</id>
	<title>Re:OUCH!</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1265114220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yep. Waaaaay sharper than a snowflake, even. And we all know how many deaths-by-slash-wounds there are from those.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep .
Waaaaay sharper than a snowflake , even .
And we all know how many deaths-by-slash-wounds there are from those .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep.
Waaaaay sharper than a snowflake, even.
And we all know how many deaths-by-slash-wounds there are from those.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001992</id>
	<title>Re:winshield repair?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265109480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Can I now avoid costly windshield replacements by simply spraying this stuff on my windshield after a ding storm, or crack?</p></div><p>
The problem with having a crack isn't the divot where the crack started, it's the leading end of the crack.  When you apply stress to a material that has a crack, the force per unit area at the tip of the crack approaches infinity, so what you have to do to keep the crack from spreading is increase its area.  That's why windshield repair people drill holes at the ends of the cracks and then fill them.</p><p>
Even if your intent is just to fill the much smaller divots in the glass, 30 molecules thick isn't going to make much difference.  What you need is a material that has roughly the same index of refraction as the glass, that you can spread over the divots like makeup.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I now avoid costly windshield replacements by simply spraying this stuff on my windshield after a ding storm , or crack ?
The problem with having a crack is n't the divot where the crack started , it 's the leading end of the crack .
When you apply stress to a material that has a crack , the force per unit area at the tip of the crack approaches infinity , so what you have to do to keep the crack from spreading is increase its area .
That 's why windshield repair people drill holes at the ends of the cracks and then fill them .
Even if your intent is just to fill the much smaller divots in the glass , 30 molecules thick is n't going to make much difference .
What you need is a material that has roughly the same index of refraction as the glass , that you can spread over the divots like makeup .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I now avoid costly windshield replacements by simply spraying this stuff on my windshield after a ding storm, or crack?
The problem with having a crack isn't the divot where the crack started, it's the leading end of the crack.
When you apply stress to a material that has a crack, the force per unit area at the tip of the crack approaches infinity, so what you have to do to keep the crack from spreading is increase its area.
That's why windshield repair people drill holes at the ends of the cracks and then fill them.
Even if your intent is just to fill the much smaller divots in the glass, 30 molecules thick isn't going to make much difference.
What you need is a material that has roughly the same index of refraction as the glass, that you can spread over the divots like makeup.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007184</id>
	<title>Re:No information</title>
	<author>mr\_snarf</author>
	<datestamp>1264929360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its a paradigm breaking investment opportunity that is going to revolutionise the way we do everything!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its a paradigm breaking investment opportunity that is going to revolutionise the way we do everything !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its a paradigm breaking investment opportunity that is going to revolutionise the way we do everything!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31005998</id>
	<title>Re:winshield repair?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265134020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While this is true, the unfortunate part is that some fanatics somewhere will still try to use this to spread fear and other bullcrap like they always do. I mean change and new technology is evil after all =/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While this is true , the unfortunate part is that some fanatics somewhere will still try to use this to spread fear and other bullcrap like they always do .
I mean change and new technology is evil after all = /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While this is true, the unfortunate part is that some fanatics somewhere will still try to use this to spread fear and other bullcrap like they always do.
I mean change and new technology is evil after all =/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31012262</id>
	<title>Re:winshield repair?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264963020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Also - Spray on shoes!</p><p>Plus a pasta tornado and massive cheeseburgers...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Also - Spray on shoes ! Plus a pasta tornado and massive cheeseburgers.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also - Spray on shoes!Plus a pasta tornado and massive cheeseburgers...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002214</id>
	<title>Re:winshield repair?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265110680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Silicosis anyone?  Silicone Dioxide is silica - the stuff they remove from regular sand to make play sand, so kids don't inhale the stuff and get lung diseases!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Silicosis anyone ?
Silicone Dioxide is silica - the stuff they remove from regular sand to make play sand , so kids do n't inhale the stuff and get lung diseases !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Silicosis anyone?
Silicone Dioxide is silica - the stuff they remove from regular sand to make play sand, so kids don't inhale the stuff and get lung diseases!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31004516</id>
	<title>Re:Anti-graffiti?</title>
	<author>sponga</author>
	<datestamp>1265124660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Than they'll just start scratching it, they're scumbags.</p><p>A lot of the tagging going on now is cheap crap you scratch into a surface with a flathead or something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Than they 'll just start scratching it , they 're scumbags.A lot of the tagging going on now is cheap crap you scratch into a surface with a flathead or something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Than they'll just start scratching it, they're scumbags.A lot of the tagging going on now is cheap crap you scratch into a surface with a flathead or something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001972</id>
	<title>Re:All glass is liquid</title>
	<author>mea37</author>
	<datestamp>1265109420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So I'm all for moderation not being aligned with agreement, but I'm not sure how a factually incorrect post can be "Informative"...</p><p>Oh, wait, I get it... the post informs us in that now we know chemists can fall for myths just like everyone else.</p><p>(The reason old windows are thicker at the bottom is that they were built that way, for structural reasons.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So I 'm all for moderation not being aligned with agreement , but I 'm not sure how a factually incorrect post can be " Informative " ...Oh , wait , I get it... the post informs us in that now we know chemists can fall for myths just like everyone else .
( The reason old windows are thicker at the bottom is that they were built that way , for structural reasons .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I'm all for moderation not being aligned with agreement, but I'm not sure how a factually incorrect post can be "Informative"...Oh, wait, I get it... the post informs us in that now we know chemists can fall for myths just like everyone else.
(The reason old windows are thicker at the bottom is that they were built that way, for structural reasons.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001828</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31004424</id>
	<title>fix scratched CDs and DVDs?</title>
	<author>davygrvy</author>
	<datestamp>1265124060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That would be my immediate need.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That would be my immediate need .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would be my immediate need.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007310</id>
	<title>Re:OUCH!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264930860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sharpness is a matter of area, applied forces and proportions.</p><p>A sheet of window-grade glass can be incredibly sharp, but you can't hold a piece larger than a few square feet by a single corner. It breaks under its own weight.</p><p>Similarly, take the glass slides that you would use under a microscope; just a few mm thick. If a piece was made the size of a 4" x 6" picture frame, it would suffer the same, fragile fate as the window.</p><p>So, thinking along those lines, how big of a shard of 30-atom-thick glass would it take to puncture/cut skin? Unless the forces involved were precisely applied (or you have incredibly bad luck) I'm thinking it would utterly shatter to dust.</p><p>I'm more fearful of the Siliconosis, personally... or a skin-suffocation scenario a'la <i>Goldfinger</i>. (<a href="http://mythbustersresults.com/pilot3" title="mythbustersresults.com" rel="nofollow">The gold paint may not kill you</a> [mythbustersresults.com], but who says a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.001 micron-thick layer of glass wouldn't?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sharpness is a matter of area , applied forces and proportions.A sheet of window-grade glass can be incredibly sharp , but you ca n't hold a piece larger than a few square feet by a single corner .
It breaks under its own weight.Similarly , take the glass slides that you would use under a microscope ; just a few mm thick .
If a piece was made the size of a 4 " x 6 " picture frame , it would suffer the same , fragile fate as the window.So , thinking along those lines , how big of a shard of 30-atom-thick glass would it take to puncture/cut skin ?
Unless the forces involved were precisely applied ( or you have incredibly bad luck ) I 'm thinking it would utterly shatter to dust.I 'm more fearful of the Siliconosis , personally... or a skin-suffocation scenario a'la Goldfinger .
( The gold paint may not kill you [ mythbustersresults.com ] , but who says a .001 micron-thick layer of glass would n't ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sharpness is a matter of area, applied forces and proportions.A sheet of window-grade glass can be incredibly sharp, but you can't hold a piece larger than a few square feet by a single corner.
It breaks under its own weight.Similarly, take the glass slides that you would use under a microscope; just a few mm thick.
If a piece was made the size of a 4" x 6" picture frame, it would suffer the same, fragile fate as the window.So, thinking along those lines, how big of a shard of 30-atom-thick glass would it take to puncture/cut skin?
Unless the forces involved were precisely applied (or you have incredibly bad luck) I'm thinking it would utterly shatter to dust.I'm more fearful of the Siliconosis, personally... or a skin-suffocation scenario a'la Goldfinger.
(The gold paint may not kill you [mythbustersresults.com], but who says a .001 micron-thick layer of glass wouldn't?
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002676</id>
	<title>Any other uses?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265113560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can it prevent the transmission of HIV?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can it prevent the transmission of HIV ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can it prevent the transmission of HIV?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002012</id>
	<title>You've got me? Who's got you?</title>
	<author>Shabazz Rabbinowitz</author>
	<datestamp>1265109600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If nothing sticks to it, how does it stay on?<br>
<br>
It reminds me of the old joke: a young man comes back from his first year as a college chemistry major. His father asks him what he is working on. "We're trying to create the universal solvent."<br>
<br>
"What's that?"<br>
<br>
"It's a liquid that will dissolve anything."<br>
<br>
"What're ya gonna keep it in?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>If nothing sticks to it , how does it stay on ?
It reminds me of the old joke : a young man comes back from his first year as a college chemistry major .
His father asks him what he is working on .
" We 're trying to create the universal solvent .
" " What 's that ?
" " It 's a liquid that will dissolve anything .
" " What 're ya gon na keep it in ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If nothing sticks to it, how does it stay on?
It reminds me of the old joke: a young man comes back from his first year as a college chemistry major.
His father asks him what he is working on.
"We're trying to create the universal solvent.
"

"What's that?
"

"It's a liquid that will dissolve anything.
"

"What're ya gonna keep it in?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002434</id>
	<title>Re:All glass is liquid</title>
	<author>iris-n</author>
	<datestamp>1265111940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nice trolling.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice trolling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice trolling.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001828</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002312</id>
	<title>Condums in a can</title>
	<author>xmousex</author>
	<datestamp>1265111280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i win</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i win</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i win</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002026</id>
	<title>Think bigger</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265109660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Forget your windshield, think YOUR ENTIRE CAR!</p><p>No more clear coats, no more waxing, no more "rubberized under coating". If it is cheap, and light enough, you could coat every body panel and frame member with the stuff, virtually guarantying a rust proof existence.</p><p>-Rick</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Forget your windshield , think YOUR ENTIRE CAR ! No more clear coats , no more waxing , no more " rubberized under coating " .
If it is cheap , and light enough , you could coat every body panel and frame member with the stuff , virtually guarantying a rust proof existence.-Rick</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forget your windshield, think YOUR ENTIRE CAR!No more clear coats, no more waxing, no more "rubberized under coating".
If it is cheap, and light enough, you could coat every body panel and frame member with the stuff, virtually guarantying a rust proof existence.-Rick</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31012910</id>
	<title>Re:winshield repair?</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1264966080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, the fine dust is what causes silicosis, not the grains you find on the beach. The more fine dust there is in it, the worse for you it is. That's why sand blasting requires protective gear and throwing sand around in the sandbox doesn't.</p><p>A nano-particle spray is going to be much worse than the dust from sandblasting.</p><p>That's the elephant in the room for the various nanoparticle consumer products, just about any solid turned into a fine dust will destroy your lungs. The only thing special about asbestos is that the fibers have a natural tendency to break into tiny particles. If not for that, it would be harmless.</p><p>To make matters worse, nano-size particles can potentially go from lungs to bloodstream, then cross the blood-brain barrier. Many substances are only safe (in small quantities) because they don't reach the brain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the fine dust is what causes silicosis , not the grains you find on the beach .
The more fine dust there is in it , the worse for you it is .
That 's why sand blasting requires protective gear and throwing sand around in the sandbox does n't.A nano-particle spray is going to be much worse than the dust from sandblasting.That 's the elephant in the room for the various nanoparticle consumer products , just about any solid turned into a fine dust will destroy your lungs .
The only thing special about asbestos is that the fibers have a natural tendency to break into tiny particles .
If not for that , it would be harmless.To make matters worse , nano-size particles can potentially go from lungs to bloodstream , then cross the blood-brain barrier .
Many substances are only safe ( in small quantities ) because they do n't reach the brain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the fine dust is what causes silicosis, not the grains you find on the beach.
The more fine dust there is in it, the worse for you it is.
That's why sand blasting requires protective gear and throwing sand around in the sandbox doesn't.A nano-particle spray is going to be much worse than the dust from sandblasting.That's the elephant in the room for the various nanoparticle consumer products, just about any solid turned into a fine dust will destroy your lungs.
The only thing special about asbestos is that the fibers have a natural tendency to break into tiny particles.
If not for that, it would be harmless.To make matters worse, nano-size particles can potentially go from lungs to bloodstream, then cross the blood-brain barrier.
Many substances are only safe (in small quantities) because they don't reach the brain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31006196</id>
	<title>Re:bleach is great but focus on antibiotics</title>
	<author>Dudeman\_Jones</author>
	<datestamp>1265135700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>uh no.  we should avoid antibiotics as much as possible except under strict circumstance, or else we'll breed a super bug that antibiotics can't kill.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>uh no .
we should avoid antibiotics as much as possible except under strict circumstance , or else we 'll breed a super bug that antibiotics ca n't kill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>uh no.
we should avoid antibiotics as much as possible except under strict circumstance, or else we'll breed a super bug that antibiotics can't kill.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002002</id>
	<title>Anti-graffiti?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265109540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if this could help make graffiti removal easier.  Spray this on a clean road sign, and then just wash it with water if it gets tagged.  Sure could help new drivers in Los Angeles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if this could help make graffiti removal easier .
Spray this on a clean road sign , and then just wash it with water if it gets tagged .
Sure could help new drivers in Los Angeles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if this could help make graffiti removal easier.
Spray this on a clean road sign, and then just wash it with water if it gets tagged.
Sure could help new drivers in Los Angeles.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001914</id>
	<title>Re:All glass is liquid</title>
	<author>EvanED</author>
	<datestamp>1265109180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass#Glass\_versus\_a\_supercooled\_liquid" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia disagrees.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>In particular, the myth that glass in older houses is thicker at the bottom because it flowed definitely seems to be just that -- a myth:</p><blockquote><div><p>If medieval glass has flowed perceptibly, then ancient Roman and Egyptian objects should have flowed proportionately more  but this is not observed. Similarly, prehistoric obsidian blades should have lost their edge; this is not observed either (although obsidian may have a different viscosity from window glass).<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... If glass flows at a rate that allows changes to be seen with the naked eye after centuries, then the effect should be noticeable in antique telescopes. Any slight deformation in the antique telescopic lenses would lead to a dramatic decrease in optical performance, a phenomenon that is not observed.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wikipedia disagrees .
[ wikipedia.org ] In particular , the myth that glass in older houses is thicker at the bottom because it flowed definitely seems to be just that -- a myth : If medieval glass has flowed perceptibly , then ancient Roman and Egyptian objects should have flowed proportionately more but this is not observed .
Similarly , prehistoric obsidian blades should have lost their edge ; this is not observed either ( although obsidian may have a different viscosity from window glass ) .
... If glass flows at a rate that allows changes to be seen with the naked eye after centuries , then the effect should be noticeable in antique telescopes .
Any slight deformation in the antique telescopic lenses would lead to a dramatic decrease in optical performance , a phenomenon that is not observed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wikipedia disagrees.
[wikipedia.org]In particular, the myth that glass in older houses is thicker at the bottom because it flowed definitely seems to be just that -- a myth:If medieval glass has flowed perceptibly, then ancient Roman and Egyptian objects should have flowed proportionately more  but this is not observed.
Similarly, prehistoric obsidian blades should have lost their edge; this is not observed either (although obsidian may have a different viscosity from window glass).
... If glass flows at a rate that allows changes to be seen with the naked eye after centuries, then the effect should be noticeable in antique telescopes.
Any slight deformation in the antique telescopic lenses would lead to a dramatic decrease in optical performance, a phenomenon that is not observed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001828</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002364</id>
	<title>As the glass wears off/down</title>
	<author>bigattichouse</author>
	<datestamp>1265111580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can feel my lungs beginning to itch, ahhh <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicosis" title="wikipedia.org">Silicosis</a> [wikipedia.org] - how nice that EVERYTHING will be covered in a fine layer of silicon that *WILL* wear away and add some lovely fine powdered glass to my daily breathing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can feel my lungs beginning to itch , ahhh Silicosis [ wikipedia.org ] - how nice that EVERYTHING will be covered in a fine layer of silicon that * WILL * wear away and add some lovely fine powdered glass to my daily breathing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can feel my lungs beginning to itch, ahhh Silicosis [wikipedia.org] - how nice that EVERYTHING will be covered in a fine layer of silicon that *WILL* wear away and add some lovely fine powdered glass to my daily breathing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002142</id>
	<title>here is my (serious) question:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265110320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what happens when a piece of it is chipped off and put into the human body?</p><p>im not one of those ultra health nuts that walks around with a respirator (do such people actually exist?), but, i do try to avoid the use of certain types of pots and pans if i can help it (as in, those pans that have non stick teflon type surfaces breaking apart into peoples foods as they cook which, if im not mistaken, have been shown to cause cancer--- is this a wild conspiracy theory or is it as well known as it seems to be?)</p><p>either way. i dont expect that any testing of this nature will be done (seeing as how we have become so painfully backwards as a race that we would rather potentially harm humans than feed a couple of rats and dogs some tasty food with a few of these 'chips' in it).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what happens when a piece of it is chipped off and put into the human body ? im not one of those ultra health nuts that walks around with a respirator ( do such people actually exist ?
) , but , i do try to avoid the use of certain types of pots and pans if i can help it ( as in , those pans that have non stick teflon type surfaces breaking apart into peoples foods as they cook which , if im not mistaken , have been shown to cause cancer--- is this a wild conspiracy theory or is it as well known as it seems to be ?
) either way .
i dont expect that any testing of this nature will be done ( seeing as how we have become so painfully backwards as a race that we would rather potentially harm humans than feed a couple of rats and dogs some tasty food with a few of these 'chips ' in it ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what happens when a piece of it is chipped off and put into the human body?im not one of those ultra health nuts that walks around with a respirator (do such people actually exist?
), but, i do try to avoid the use of certain types of pots and pans if i can help it (as in, those pans that have non stick teflon type surfaces breaking apart into peoples foods as they cook which, if im not mistaken, have been shown to cause cancer--- is this a wild conspiracy theory or is it as well known as it seems to be?
)either way.
i dont expect that any testing of this nature will be done (seeing as how we have become so painfully backwards as a race that we would rather potentially harm humans than feed a couple of rats and dogs some tasty food with a few of these 'chips' in it).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007192</id>
	<title>Re: Think bigger, then smaller</title>
	<author>Duggeek</author>
	<datestamp>1264929480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Forget your windshield, think YOUR ENTIRE CAR! [...]</p><p>-Rick</p></div><p>You're on to something, but the other respondents have a point. It's just a few-dozen atoms thick, and I don't think it's going to stand-up to 50mph gravel being thrown at it.</p><p>Still, there's huge potential for the &ldquo;invisible bra&rdquo; and clear-coat treatments. With a bit more R&amp;D, I bet they could make a more abrasion-resistant form of the stuff for undercarriage.</p><p>Keep thinkin' big!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Forget your windshield , think YOUR ENTIRE CAR !
[ ... ] -RickYou 're on to something , but the other respondents have a point .
It 's just a few-dozen atoms thick , and I do n't think it 's going to stand-up to 50mph gravel being thrown at it.Still , there 's huge potential for the    invisible bra    and clear-coat treatments .
With a bit more R&amp;D , I bet they could make a more abrasion-resistant form of the stuff for undercarriage.Keep thinkin ' big !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forget your windshield, think YOUR ENTIRE CAR!
[...]-RickYou're on to something, but the other respondents have a point.
It's just a few-dozen atoms thick, and I don't think it's going to stand-up to 50mph gravel being thrown at it.Still, there's huge potential for the “invisible bra” and clear-coat treatments.
With a bit more R&amp;D, I bet they could make a more abrasion-resistant form of the stuff for undercarriage.Keep thinkin' big!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002476</id>
	<title>old fashioned silane chemistry ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265112240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>www.gelest.com has about a gazillion diff silane compounds, if the std ones from dowcorning or degussa are good enough for you<br>In the presence of atmospheric moisture, silanes form silicone dioxide like networks...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>www.gelest.com has about a gazillion diff silane compounds , if the std ones from dowcorning or degussa are good enough for youIn the presence of atmospheric moisture , silanes form silicone dioxide like networks.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>www.gelest.com has about a gazillion diff silane compounds, if the std ones from dowcorning or degussa are good enough for youIn the presence of atmospheric moisture, silanes form silicone dioxide like networks...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002192</id>
	<title>Meh</title>
	<author>dreamchaser</author>
	<datestamp>1265110500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cracks up to a few inches long can be sealed already with existing resins that windshield replacement/repair companies use, and most insurance policies (at least here in the US) cover repair for free with no deductible; only full replacements incur such.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cracks up to a few inches long can be sealed already with existing resins that windshield replacement/repair companies use , and most insurance policies ( at least here in the US ) cover repair for free with no deductible ; only full replacements incur such .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cracks up to a few inches long can be sealed already with existing resins that windshield replacement/repair companies use, and most insurance policies (at least here in the US) cover repair for free with no deductible; only full replacements incur such.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31010558</id>
	<title>Re:Anti-graffiti?</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1264956780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I wonder if this could help make graffiti removal easier. Spray this on a clean road sign, and then just wash it with water if it gets tagged. Sure could help new drivers in Los Angeles.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>Except that it'll get washed off by the rain, and taggers before they paint them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if this could help make graffiti removal easier .
Spray this on a clean road sign , and then just wash it with water if it gets tagged .
Sure could help new drivers in Los Angeles .
Except that it 'll get washed off by the rain , and taggers before they paint them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if this could help make graffiti removal easier.
Spray this on a clean road sign, and then just wash it with water if it gets tagged.
Sure could help new drivers in Los Angeles.
Except that it'll get washed off by the rain, and taggers before they paint them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31004232</id>
	<title>Scratch resistant coating for plastic?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265122800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Think of this over screens and on cases and on cheap sunglasses and regular plastic lenses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Think of this over screens and on cases and on cheap sunglasses and regular plastic lenses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think of this over screens and on cases and on cheap sunglasses and regular plastic lenses.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31005924</id>
	<title>Re:All glass is liquid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265133480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obsidian tools have retained razor sharp edges for thousands of years. Glass != liquid</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obsidian tools have retained razor sharp edges for thousands of years .
Glass ! = liquid</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obsidian tools have retained razor sharp edges for thousands of years.
Glass != liquid</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001828</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003238</id>
	<title>Bleach is not a base</title>
	<author>Cyberax</author>
	<datestamp>1265116440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nitpick: bleach is not a strong base, it's a strong oxidizer.</p><p>You're thinking about NaOH (which is a base) - good stuff as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nitpick : bleach is not a strong base , it 's a strong oxidizer.You 're thinking about NaOH ( which is a base ) - good stuff as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nitpick: bleach is not a strong base, it's a strong oxidizer.You're thinking about NaOH (which is a base) - good stuff as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31018068</id>
	<title>Re:winshield repair?</title>
	<author>budgenator</author>
	<datestamp>1264950780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Silica is the most abundant mineral in the Earth's crust <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silica" title="wikipedia.org">Silicon dioxide</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Silica is the most abundant mineral in the Earth 's crust Silicon dioxide [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Silica is the most abundant mineral in the Earth's crust Silicon dioxide [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31010484</id>
	<title>Here's how much silica is in this coating:</title>
	<author>jeffb (2.718)</author>
	<datestamp>1264956540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Silicon dioxide's bulk density is 2200 kg/m^3.  Let's assume the density of this coating is comparable.</p><p>One square meter of silica, one meter deep, masses 2200 kg.</p><p>One millimeter deep, 2.2 kg.</p><p>One micron deep, 2.2 g.</p><p>One nanometer deep, 2.2 mg.</p><p>If you dispersed a square meter of this coating uniformly into the air, you'd need to dilute it into a column 22 meters deep to meet the OSHA limit.  But how are you going to disperse that much all at once?  A crack or a scratch would likely <i>disperse</i> much less than a square millimeter worth of the stuff, and that wouldn't be enough to pollute half a shot glass full of air.  (1 m^3 = 1000 L; 22000 L / 1000000 = 22 ml)</p><p>More to the point, that volume is about 1/20 of a typical breath.  In other words, you'd need to scrape the hell out of the surface in order to get <i>one lungful</i> of air above the OSHA limit -- and that limit is for chronic exposure (8 hours/day), not a one-shot acute exposure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Silicon dioxide 's bulk density is 2200 kg/m ^ 3 .
Let 's assume the density of this coating is comparable.One square meter of silica , one meter deep , masses 2200 kg.One millimeter deep , 2.2 kg.One micron deep , 2.2 g.One nanometer deep , 2.2 mg.If you dispersed a square meter of this coating uniformly into the air , you 'd need to dilute it into a column 22 meters deep to meet the OSHA limit .
But how are you going to disperse that much all at once ?
A crack or a scratch would likely disperse much less than a square millimeter worth of the stuff , and that would n't be enough to pollute half a shot glass full of air .
( 1 m ^ 3 = 1000 L ; 22000 L / 1000000 = 22 ml ) More to the point , that volume is about 1/20 of a typical breath .
In other words , you 'd need to scrape the hell out of the surface in order to get one lungful of air above the OSHA limit -- and that limit is for chronic exposure ( 8 hours/day ) , not a one-shot acute exposure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Silicon dioxide's bulk density is 2200 kg/m^3.
Let's assume the density of this coating is comparable.One square meter of silica, one meter deep, masses 2200 kg.One millimeter deep, 2.2 kg.One micron deep, 2.2 g.One nanometer deep, 2.2 mg.If you dispersed a square meter of this coating uniformly into the air, you'd need to dilute it into a column 22 meters deep to meet the OSHA limit.
But how are you going to disperse that much all at once?
A crack or a scratch would likely disperse much less than a square millimeter worth of the stuff, and that wouldn't be enough to pollute half a shot glass full of air.
(1 m^3 = 1000 L; 22000 L / 1000000 = 22 ml)More to the point, that volume is about 1/20 of a typical breath.
In other words, you'd need to scrape the hell out of the surface in order to get one lungful of air above the OSHA limit -- and that limit is for chronic exposure (8 hours/day), not a one-shot acute exposure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794</id>
	<title>winshield repair?</title>
	<author>ak\_hepcat</author>
	<datestamp>1265108460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can I now avoid costly windshield replacements by simply spraying this stuff on my windshield after a ding storm, or crack?</p><p>Because that'd be nice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I now avoid costly windshield replacements by simply spraying this stuff on my windshield after a ding storm , or crack ? Because that 'd be nice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I now avoid costly windshield replacements by simply spraying this stuff on my windshield after a ding storm, or crack?Because that'd be nice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31013110</id>
	<title>Re:All glass is liquid</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1264966980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, it DOESN'T disagree that glass is a liquid, it just disagrees that that fact is the reason for ancient glass panes being thicker at the bottom. (Which is actually an artifact of the way glass panes were formed before float glass was developed).</p><p>There is enough justification to classify glass as a solid or as a liquid. If you call it a liquid, it is one so viscous that it will show no appreciable flow in the span of mere centuries.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , it DOES N'T disagree that glass is a liquid , it just disagrees that that fact is the reason for ancient glass panes being thicker at the bottom .
( Which is actually an artifact of the way glass panes were formed before float glass was developed ) .There is enough justification to classify glass as a solid or as a liquid .
If you call it a liquid , it is one so viscous that it will show no appreciable flow in the span of mere centuries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, it DOESN'T disagree that glass is a liquid, it just disagrees that that fact is the reason for ancient glass panes being thicker at the bottom.
(Which is actually an artifact of the way glass panes were formed before float glass was developed).There is enough justification to classify glass as a solid or as a liquid.
If you call it a liquid, it is one so viscous that it will show no appreciable flow in the span of mere centuries.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002080</id>
	<title>Germ free lungs!</title>
	<author>mseidl</author>
	<datestamp>1265109960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>1. Just spray this in my lungs to prevent me from ever getting a cold again!<br>
2. ???<br>
3. Profit!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Just spray this in my lungs to prevent me from ever getting a cold again !
2. ? ? ?
3. Profit ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Just spray this in my lungs to prevent me from ever getting a cold again!
2. ???
3. Profit!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002280</id>
	<title>Pulmonary Saccharosis</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265111100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't forget the dreaded Saccharosis, also known as Sugar Lung, caused by consuming Pixy Stix too fast.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget the dreaded Saccharosis , also known as Sugar Lung , caused by consuming Pixy Stix too fast .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget the dreaded Saccharosis, also known as Sugar Lung, caused by consuming Pixy Stix too fast.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003306</id>
	<title>Re:Think bigger</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1265116800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>No more clear coats, no more waxing, no more "rubberized under coating". If it is cheap, and light enough, you could coat every body panel and frame member with the stuff, virtually guarantying a rust proof existence.</p></div></blockquote><p>Clear coats and waxing don't prevent rust, they merely give you a stiffy because your car looks spiffy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No more clear coats , no more waxing , no more " rubberized under coating " .
If it is cheap , and light enough , you could coat every body panel and frame member with the stuff , virtually guarantying a rust proof existence.Clear coats and waxing do n't prevent rust , they merely give you a stiffy because your car looks spiffy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No more clear coats, no more waxing, no more "rubberized under coating".
If it is cheap, and light enough, you could coat every body panel and frame member with the stuff, virtually guarantying a rust proof existence.Clear coats and waxing don't prevent rust, they merely give you a stiffy because your car looks spiffy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002650</id>
	<title>Re:bleach is great but focus on antibiotics</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265113380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, chlorine bleach (NaOCl - sodium hypochlorite) breaks down to NaCl (salt) and H2O (water), and O2 (Oxygen).</p><p>As far as industrial cleaners go, it's pretty much as good for the environment as you're going to get.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , chlorine bleach ( NaOCl - sodium hypochlorite ) breaks down to NaCl ( salt ) and H2O ( water ) , and O2 ( Oxygen ) .As far as industrial cleaners go , it 's pretty much as good for the environment as you 're going to get .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, chlorine bleach (NaOCl - sodium hypochlorite) breaks down to NaCl (salt) and H2O (water), and O2 (Oxygen).As far as industrial cleaners go, it's pretty much as good for the environment as you're going to get.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002432</id>
	<title>Re:bleach is great but focus on antibiotics</title>
	<author>vlm</author>
	<datestamp>1265111940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>we pour a gallon of that crud down the sink to kill 16 germs. not that a strong base like bleach is great for mother earth either.</p></div><p>Uh... OK.</p><p>So, first of all, silicon dioxide (the subject of the article) is soluble in strong bases.  So it won't take long for your "strong base" to dissolve this stuff away.  Or any strong base.  Heck bird poop would probably suffice.</p><p>Secondly, bleach is primarily an oxidizer, secondarily it is somewhat basic but not impressively so.  Perhaps you're thinking of some other strongly basic solution you pour down the drain, like, maybe lye based drain cleaner?</p><p>Thirdly as far as mother earth vs sodium hypochlorite, its ridiculously unstable and decomposes away before it even hits the sewage treatment plant.  I suppose that by Environmentalist Religion "original sin" doctrine it is bad, in that everything any human does is always inherently bad.  But compared to most things poured down drains, bleach is rather harmless.  You can drink it when highly diluted as a water purifier.</p><p>It "sounds good", but it indicates a lot of weird ideas about basic chemistry (basic, get that pun?)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>we pour a gallon of that crud down the sink to kill 16 germs .
not that a strong base like bleach is great for mother earth either.Uh... OK.So , first of all , silicon dioxide ( the subject of the article ) is soluble in strong bases .
So it wo n't take long for your " strong base " to dissolve this stuff away .
Or any strong base .
Heck bird poop would probably suffice.Secondly , bleach is primarily an oxidizer , secondarily it is somewhat basic but not impressively so .
Perhaps you 're thinking of some other strongly basic solution you pour down the drain , like , maybe lye based drain cleaner ? Thirdly as far as mother earth vs sodium hypochlorite , its ridiculously unstable and decomposes away before it even hits the sewage treatment plant .
I suppose that by Environmentalist Religion " original sin " doctrine it is bad , in that everything any human does is always inherently bad .
But compared to most things poured down drains , bleach is rather harmless .
You can drink it when highly diluted as a water purifier.It " sounds good " , but it indicates a lot of weird ideas about basic chemistry ( basic , get that pun ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we pour a gallon of that crud down the sink to kill 16 germs.
not that a strong base like bleach is great for mother earth either.Uh... OK.So, first of all, silicon dioxide (the subject of the article) is soluble in strong bases.
So it won't take long for your "strong base" to dissolve this stuff away.
Or any strong base.
Heck bird poop would probably suffice.Secondly, bleach is primarily an oxidizer, secondarily it is somewhat basic but not impressively so.
Perhaps you're thinking of some other strongly basic solution you pour down the drain, like, maybe lye based drain cleaner?Thirdly as far as mother earth vs sodium hypochlorite, its ridiculously unstable and decomposes away before it even hits the sewage treatment plant.
I suppose that by Environmentalist Religion "original sin" doctrine it is bad, in that everything any human does is always inherently bad.
But compared to most things poured down drains, bleach is rather harmless.
You can drink it when highly diluted as a water purifier.It "sounds good", but it indicates a lot of weird ideas about basic chemistry (basic, get that pun?
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001800</id>
	<title>Very sweet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265108520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not sure how breathable glass is, I would limit my exposure.  If its a durable surface (not prone to cracking), this could be an amazing breakthrough.  I wonder what the durability is, how often between applications.  Well, off to rtfa!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not sure how breathable glass is , I would limit my exposure .
If its a durable surface ( not prone to cracking ) , this could be an amazing breakthrough .
I wonder what the durability is , how often between applications .
Well , off to rtfa !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not sure how breathable glass is, I would limit my exposure.
If its a durable surface (not prone to cracking), this could be an amazing breakthrough.
I wonder what the durability is, how often between applications.
Well, off to rtfa!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31006044</id>
	<title>Re:winshield repair?</title>
	<author>sunderland56</author>
	<datestamp>1265134380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Silicosis only becomes an issue for people that breathe in large amounts of it on a regular basis</p></div><p>
Yes, but regular sand lies there on the ground - this stuff comes in an aerosol can. A layer of glass 20 atoms thick lining the inside of your lungs just can't be a good thing.
<br> <br>
The article says the stuff is "breathable" - but cyanide gas is breathable, too. It just isn't a recommended thing to do.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Silicosis only becomes an issue for people that breathe in large amounts of it on a regular basis Yes , but regular sand lies there on the ground - this stuff comes in an aerosol can .
A layer of glass 20 atoms thick lining the inside of your lungs just ca n't be a good thing .
The article says the stuff is " breathable " - but cyanide gas is breathable , too .
It just is n't a recommended thing to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Silicosis only becomes an issue for people that breathe in large amounts of it on a regular basis
Yes, but regular sand lies there on the ground - this stuff comes in an aerosol can.
A layer of glass 20 atoms thick lining the inside of your lungs just can't be a good thing.
The article says the stuff is "breathable" - but cyanide gas is breathable, too.
It just isn't a recommended thing to do.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001936</id>
	<title>But will it get you high when you snort it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265109240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Inhaling finely divided crystalline silica dust in very small quantities (OSHA allows 0.1 mg/m3) over time can lead to silicosis, bronchitis or (much more rarely) cancer, as the dust becomes lodged in the lungs and continuously irritates them, reducing lung capacities (silica does not dissolve over time).

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon\_dioxide" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon\_dioxide</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Inhaling finely divided crystalline silica dust in very small quantities ( OSHA allows 0.1 mg/m3 ) over time can lead to silicosis , bronchitis or ( much more rarely ) cancer , as the dust becomes lodged in the lungs and continuously irritates them , reducing lung capacities ( silica does not dissolve over time ) .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon \ _dioxide [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Inhaling finely divided crystalline silica dust in very small quantities (OSHA allows 0.1 mg/m3) over time can lead to silicosis, bronchitis or (much more rarely) cancer, as the dust becomes lodged in the lungs and continuously irritates them, reducing lung capacities (silica does not dissolve over time).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon\_dioxide [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001814</id>
	<title>Too Bad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265108520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too bad "ManInTheWhiteSuit" is too long of a tag.</p><p>What a great movie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too bad " ManInTheWhiteSuit " is too long of a tag.What a great movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too bad "ManInTheWhiteSuit" is too long of a tag.What a great movie.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003322</id>
	<title>War on germs</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1265116920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's say we have 8 different antibacterial products. Would it be wrong to think of a bacterium developing resistance to 7 of them, then losing one of those resistances in order to pick up the last one? I am assuming it is more accurate to think of it as a computer under attack, where it can be patched and potentially immune to all attacks.<br> <br>

The only way I can see for us to "win" the war against germs is to have more antibiotics/antibacterials etc. than they can possibly be immune to, but the cynic in me is assuming that is not how the science works.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's say we have 8 different antibacterial products .
Would it be wrong to think of a bacterium developing resistance to 7 of them , then losing one of those resistances in order to pick up the last one ?
I am assuming it is more accurate to think of it as a computer under attack , where it can be patched and potentially immune to all attacks .
The only way I can see for us to " win " the war against germs is to have more antibiotics/antibacterials etc .
than they can possibly be immune to , but the cynic in me is assuming that is not how the science works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's say we have 8 different antibacterial products.
Would it be wrong to think of a bacterium developing resistance to 7 of them, then losing one of those resistances in order to pick up the last one?
I am assuming it is more accurate to think of it as a computer under attack, where it can be patched and potentially immune to all attacks.
The only way I can see for us to "win" the war against germs is to have more antibiotics/antibacterials etc.
than they can possibly be immune to, but the cynic in me is assuming that is not how the science works.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002018</id>
	<title>OUCH!</title>
	<author>bullok</author>
	<datestamp>1265109660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If a sheet of glass 15 to 30 atoms thick breaks, I'd expect it to be extremely hazardous to clean up.  The pieces would be incredibly sharp.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If a sheet of glass 15 to 30 atoms thick breaks , I 'd expect it to be extremely hazardous to clean up .
The pieces would be incredibly sharp .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a sheet of glass 15 to 30 atoms thick breaks, I'd expect it to be extremely hazardous to clean up.
The pieces would be incredibly sharp.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007608</id>
	<title>Better yet</title>
	<author>chocapix</author>
	<datestamp>1264934400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Spray your graffiti on a clean road sign, and then just spray this on your graffiti.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Spray your graffiti on a clean road sign , and then just spray this on your graffiti .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spray your graffiti on a clean road sign, and then just spray this on your graffiti.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002230</id>
	<title>it's not a conductor!</title>
	<author>prgrmr</author>
	<datestamp>1265110800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Think of the fun to be had spraying this stuff on the battery terminals of ipods, cell phones and other electronic devices of those you want to annoy.  It's a party in can!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Think of the fun to be had spraying this stuff on the battery terminals of ipods , cell phones and other electronic devices of those you want to annoy .
It 's a party in can !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think of the fun to be had spraying this stuff on the battery terminals of ipods, cell phones and other electronic devices of those you want to annoy.
It's a party in can!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003434</id>
	<title>meh...</title>
	<author>nycguy</author>
	<datestamp>1265117460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>From TFA:<p><div class="quote"><p>the concept of spray-on glass is mind-boggling</p></div><p>
The concept of spray-on <i>breasts</i> is mind-boggling. The concept of spray-on glass is merely interesting.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : the concept of spray-on glass is mind-boggling The concept of spray-on breasts is mind-boggling .
The concept of spray-on glass is merely interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA:the concept of spray-on glass is mind-boggling
The concept of spray-on breasts is mind-boggling.
The concept of spray-on glass is merely interesting.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31013188</id>
	<title>Re:winshield repair?</title>
	<author>gravis777</author>
	<datestamp>1264967340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am seriously doubting that this will be allowed to be applied by anyone except a licensed professional. While it might lead to some strange fettishes, I doubt most of us would want to get this on our skin.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am seriously doubting that this will be allowed to be applied by anyone except a licensed professional .
While it might lead to some strange fettishes , I doubt most of us would want to get this on our skin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am seriously doubting that this will be allowed to be applied by anyone except a licensed professional.
While it might lead to some strange fettishes, I doubt most of us would want to get this on our skin.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002420</id>
	<title>Re:But will it get you high when you snort it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265111880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But if you smoke the dust gets embedded in mucous that you then hack up.  No worries!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But if you smoke the dust gets embedded in mucous that you then hack up .
No worries !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But if you smoke the dust gets embedded in mucous that you then hack up.
No worries!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001936</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003096</id>
	<title>Re:Possibly Risky But Highly Useful Nonetheless</title>
	<author>Turken</author>
	<datestamp>1265115600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, if you're scared of ingesting little bits of glass, I hope you're not one who uses powdered non-dairy creamer in their coffee.  Glass dust has been uses as an anti-caking agent in creamer powder for ages.  Don't believe it?  Just check the nearest can of creamer, and you see it listed right there (as silicon dioxide) in the ingredient list.</p><p>Really, with a layer as this as this product claims to make, I doubt anyone has to be that worried about tearing up their lungs or stomach.  Silicosis is only a hazard when large amounts of silica dust are inhaled over a prolonged period of time.  Asbestos is a hazard because it is formed of long crystalline fibers which keep it lodged in lungs when inhaled.  And of course ingestion of small amounts is a moot point since these layers are so thin that applying enough force to cause a fragment to cut tissue would also be enough force to pulverize the shards into particles equivalent to what we eat and breath just from our environment every day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if you 're scared of ingesting little bits of glass , I hope you 're not one who uses powdered non-dairy creamer in their coffee .
Glass dust has been uses as an anti-caking agent in creamer powder for ages .
Do n't believe it ?
Just check the nearest can of creamer , and you see it listed right there ( as silicon dioxide ) in the ingredient list.Really , with a layer as this as this product claims to make , I doubt anyone has to be that worried about tearing up their lungs or stomach .
Silicosis is only a hazard when large amounts of silica dust are inhaled over a prolonged period of time .
Asbestos is a hazard because it is formed of long crystalline fibers which keep it lodged in lungs when inhaled .
And of course ingestion of small amounts is a moot point since these layers are so thin that applying enough force to cause a fragment to cut tissue would also be enough force to pulverize the shards into particles equivalent to what we eat and breath just from our environment every day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if you're scared of ingesting little bits of glass, I hope you're not one who uses powdered non-dairy creamer in their coffee.
Glass dust has been uses as an anti-caking agent in creamer powder for ages.
Don't believe it?
Just check the nearest can of creamer, and you see it listed right there (as silicon dioxide) in the ingredient list.Really, with a layer as this as this product claims to make, I doubt anyone has to be that worried about tearing up their lungs or stomach.
Silicosis is only a hazard when large amounts of silica dust are inhaled over a prolonged period of time.
Asbestos is a hazard because it is formed of long crystalline fibers which keep it lodged in lungs when inhaled.
And of course ingestion of small amounts is a moot point since these layers are so thin that applying enough force to cause a fragment to cut tissue would also be enough force to pulverize the shards into particles equivalent to what we eat and breath just from our environment every day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007720</id>
	<title>Re:No information</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264935720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps they want to keep the details secret, at least until the patent is approved, to prevent competition?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps they want to keep the details secret , at least until the patent is approved , to prevent competition ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps they want to keep the details secret, at least until the patent is approved, to prevent competition?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003550</id>
	<title>And who is spinning in their grave right now?</title>
	<author>xactuary</author>
	<datestamp>1265118060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That would be Billy Mays.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That would be Billy Mays .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would be Billy Mays.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002500</id>
	<title>Water resistant?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265112420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;"The spray forms a water-resistant layer, meaning it can be cleaned using only water."</p><p>Last time I checked, that is NOT the definition of water-resistant.  "Water-resistant" means just that- it resists being dissolved by or being penetrated by water.  It does not mean it can be "cleaned using only water."  ("Water-proof", means it can NOT be dissolved by or penetrated at all by water.)  Who writes this stuff??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; " The spray forms a water-resistant layer , meaning it can be cleaned using only water .
" Last time I checked , that is NOT the definition of water-resistant .
" Water-resistant " means just that- it resists being dissolved by or being penetrated by water .
It does not mean it can be " cleaned using only water .
" ( " Water-proof " , means it can NOT be dissolved by or penetrated at all by water .
) Who writes this stuff ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;"The spray forms a water-resistant layer, meaning it can be cleaned using only water.
"Last time I checked, that is NOT the definition of water-resistant.
"Water-resistant" means just that- it resists being dissolved by or being penetrated by water.
It does not mean it can be "cleaned using only water.
"  ("Water-proof", means it can NOT be dissolved by or penetrated at all by water.
)  Who writes this stuff?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007832</id>
	<title>Re:No information</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264937100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given the name of the company it's most probably nanotechnology which also implies that no decent risk-assessment has been made about the possible harmful effects to humans and/or the environment at large.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given the name of the company it 's most probably nanotechnology which also implies that no decent risk-assessment has been made about the possible harmful effects to humans and/or the environment at large .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given the name of the company it's most probably nanotechnology which also implies that no decent risk-assessment has been made about the possible harmful effects to humans and/or the environment at large.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007996</id>
	<title>Re:All glass is liquid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264939080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"(The reason old windows are thicker at the bottom is that they were built that way, for structural reasons.)"</p><p>Well, I see you're just as susceptible.</p><p>They didn't have glass rolling machines back then, it was mostly hand-blown and rolled on stone. It was thicker at one end because they simply didn't have the equipment to just roll out perfectly smooth and even panes of glass like we can.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ( The reason old windows are thicker at the bottom is that they were built that way , for structural reasons .
) " Well , I see you 're just as susceptible.They did n't have glass rolling machines back then , it was mostly hand-blown and rolled on stone .
It was thicker at one end because they simply did n't have the equipment to just roll out perfectly smooth and even panes of glass like we can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"(The reason old windows are thicker at the bottom is that they were built that way, for structural reasons.
)"Well, I see you're just as susceptible.They didn't have glass rolling machines back then, it was mostly hand-blown and rolled on stone.
It was thicker at one end because they simply didn't have the equipment to just roll out perfectly smooth and even panes of glass like we can.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31010782</id>
	<title>Re:bleach is great but focus on antibiotics</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264957620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>sodium hypochlorite<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... You can drink it when highly diluted as a water purifier</p></div></blockquote><p> As a matter of fact, our water treatment plant uses sodium hypochlorite for our fresh water supply.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water\_purification#Chlorine\_disinfection" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water\_purification#Chlorine\_disinfection</a> [wikipedia.org] <br>Cheaper and safer than using chlorine gas.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>sodium hypochlorite ... You can drink it when highly diluted as a water purifier As a matter of fact , our water treatment plant uses sodium hypochlorite for our fresh water supply.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water \ _purification # Chlorine \ _disinfection [ wikipedia.org ] Cheaper and safer than using chlorine gas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sodium hypochlorite ... You can drink it when highly diluted as a water purifier As a matter of fact, our water treatment plant uses sodium hypochlorite for our fresh water supply.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water\_purification#Chlorine\_disinfection [wikipedia.org] Cheaper and safer than using chlorine gas.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001782</id>
	<title>bleach is great but focus on antibiotics</title>
	<author>digitalsushi</author>
	<datestamp>1265108400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>we pour a gallon of that crud down the sink to kill 16 germs.  not that a strong base like bleach is great for mother earth either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>we pour a gallon of that crud down the sink to kill 16 germs .
not that a strong base like bleach is great for mother earth either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we pour a gallon of that crud down the sink to kill 16 germs.
not that a strong base like bleach is great for mother earth either.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003852</id>
	<title>Check the ingredients list of non dairy creamer</title>
	<author>140Mandak262Jamuna</author>
	<datestamp>1265120220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>silicon di oxide is a common ingredient in many things we ingest. Notably non dairy creamer. But I have seen it in so many common food items surprisingly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>silicon di oxide is a common ingredient in many things we ingest .
Notably non dairy creamer .
But I have seen it in so many common food items surprisingly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>silicon di oxide is a common ingredient in many things we ingest.
Notably non dairy creamer.
But I have seen it in so many common food items surprisingly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002854</id>
	<title>Re:winshield repair?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265114460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, "play sand" is still almost entirely silicon dioxide, just like "regular sand."</p><p>The only difference is that the play sand has been washed and screened so that it has less dust and a more uniform grain size.  The fact is, "toxic" silicon dioxide is all around us, and we all breathe some amount of it in every single day.  Silicosis only becomes an issue for people that breathe in large amounts of it on a regular basis - i.e. people who work 40+ hours a week in fine-dust-generating industries.  If the silicon dioxide found in "regular sand" was truly a health hazard, then every beach in California would be outlawed (or at least coated in warning stickers) telling you to keep away.  Hasn't ever happened, and never will, since casual exposure from playing in sand is not a silicosis hazard in any way.</p><p>Another thing to consider is that given the typical chemical makeup of rocks and sand is that <em>if</em> it were even possible to remove all the "harmful" SiO2 from sand all you'd be left with was a fine dust of metals and trace elements which <em>would</em> be harmful if played in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , " play sand " is still almost entirely silicon dioxide , just like " regular sand .
" The only difference is that the play sand has been washed and screened so that it has less dust and a more uniform grain size .
The fact is , " toxic " silicon dioxide is all around us , and we all breathe some amount of it in every single day .
Silicosis only becomes an issue for people that breathe in large amounts of it on a regular basis - i.e .
people who work 40 + hours a week in fine-dust-generating industries .
If the silicon dioxide found in " regular sand " was truly a health hazard , then every beach in California would be outlawed ( or at least coated in warning stickers ) telling you to keep away .
Has n't ever happened , and never will , since casual exposure from playing in sand is not a silicosis hazard in any way.Another thing to consider is that given the typical chemical makeup of rocks and sand is that if it were even possible to remove all the " harmful " SiO2 from sand all you 'd be left with was a fine dust of metals and trace elements which would be harmful if played in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, "play sand" is still almost entirely silicon dioxide, just like "regular sand.
"The only difference is that the play sand has been washed and screened so that it has less dust and a more uniform grain size.
The fact is, "toxic" silicon dioxide is all around us, and we all breathe some amount of it in every single day.
Silicosis only becomes an issue for people that breathe in large amounts of it on a regular basis - i.e.
people who work 40+ hours a week in fine-dust-generating industries.
If the silicon dioxide found in "regular sand" was truly a health hazard, then every beach in California would be outlawed (or at least coated in warning stickers) telling you to keep away.
Hasn't ever happened, and never will, since casual exposure from playing in sand is not a silicosis hazard in any way.Another thing to consider is that given the typical chemical makeup of rocks and sand is that if it were even possible to remove all the "harmful" SiO2 from sand all you'd be left with was a fine dust of metals and trace elements which would be harmful if played in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31006842</id>
	<title>Re:bleach is great but focus on antibiotics</title>
	<author>pinkushun</author>
	<datestamp>1264969260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You can drink it when highly diluted as a water purifier.</p></div><p>At a dilution of 8 drops of bleach to 3.8 liters (1 gallon) of water, that ratio should give you some idea of how 'harmless' it is, for us organics at least. -- <a href="http://www.epa.gov/ogwdw000/faq/emerg.html" title="epa.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.epa.gov/ogwdw000/faq/emerg.html</a> [epa.gov]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can drink it when highly diluted as a water purifier.At a dilution of 8 drops of bleach to 3.8 liters ( 1 gallon ) of water , that ratio should give you some idea of how 'harmless ' it is , for us organics at least .
-- http : //www.epa.gov/ogwdw000/faq/emerg.html [ epa.gov ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can drink it when highly diluted as a water purifier.At a dilution of 8 drops of bleach to 3.8 liters (1 gallon) of water, that ratio should give you some idea of how 'harmless' it is, for us organics at least.
-- http://www.epa.gov/ogwdw000/faq/emerg.html [epa.gov]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002098</id>
	<title>This Almost Sounds Familiar</title>
	<author>camperslo</author>
	<datestamp>1265110020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This product reminds of the one years ago that could provide a thin but very hard layer for vinyl records thus preventing wear (and the noise/distortion that goes with it).</p><p>If this material doesn't come off or splinter, maybe it would be good for protecting glasses with plastic lenses?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This product reminds of the one years ago that could provide a thin but very hard layer for vinyl records thus preventing wear ( and the noise/distortion that goes with it ) .If this material does n't come off or splinter , maybe it would be good for protecting glasses with plastic lenses ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This product reminds of the one years ago that could provide a thin but very hard layer for vinyl records thus preventing wear (and the noise/distortion that goes with it).If this material doesn't come off or splinter, maybe it would be good for protecting glasses with plastic lenses?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31008534</id>
	<title>Re:bleach is great but focus on antibiotics</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264945800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, since germs are reduced by using this stuff does this mean what I'm really doing is this.<br>Oh, some germs...Hmmm, I'll just spray 30 atoms of this stuff over the germs and now I'm germ free.<br>Repeat and rinse! Then to scrap the layers of this stuff off the covered over green or blank mold, II get out my all purpose easy-off oven cleaner and wipes the stuff away to start all over.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , since germs are reduced by using this stuff does this mean what I 'm really doing is this.Oh , some germs...Hmmm , I 'll just spray 30 atoms of this stuff over the germs and now I 'm germ free.Repeat and rinse !
Then to scrap the layers of this stuff off the covered over green or blank mold , II get out my all purpose easy-off oven cleaner and wipes the stuff away to start all over .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, since germs are reduced by using this stuff does this mean what I'm really doing is this.Oh, some germs...Hmmm, I'll just spray 30 atoms of this stuff over the germs and now I'm germ free.Repeat and rinse!
Then to scrap the layers of this stuff off the covered over green or blank mold, II get out my all purpose easy-off oven cleaner and wipes the stuff away to start all over.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31004164</id>
	<title>Re:winshield repair?</title>
	<author>FrigBot</author>
	<datestamp>1265122260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's another difference between "play sand" in a sandbox, and "regular sand:" The urine content.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's another difference between " play sand " in a sandbox , and " regular sand : " The urine content .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's another difference between "play sand" in a sandbox, and "regular sand:" The urine content.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002472</id>
	<title>can't wait</title>
	<author>charliemopps11</author>
	<datestamp>1265112180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't wait for all the hippies to start telling us this stuff causes cancer and crap. They'll ban it in Seattle, there will be protests to have restaurants put up signs if they use it, it's going to be hilarious.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't wait for all the hippies to start telling us this stuff causes cancer and crap .
They 'll ban it in Seattle , there will be protests to have restaurants put up signs if they use it , it 's going to be hilarious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't wait for all the hippies to start telling us this stuff causes cancer and crap.
They'll ban it in Seattle, there will be protests to have restaurants put up signs if they use it, it's going to be hilarious.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002396</id>
	<title>Re:winshield repair?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265111820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you're missing the point here:</p><p>REVOLUTIONARY SPRAY ON CONDOM</p><p>Just hope it doesn't shatter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you 're missing the point here : REVOLUTIONARY SPRAY ON CONDOMJust hope it does n't shatter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you're missing the point here:REVOLUTIONARY SPRAY ON CONDOMJust hope it doesn't shatter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002054</id>
	<title>Re:All glass is liquid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265109840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Technically, glass is solid.  Its molecules are rigidly bound and it is a non flowing, hard material.  IANAC (I am not a chemist.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Technically , glass is solid .
Its molecules are rigidly bound and it is a non flowing , hard material .
IANAC ( I am not a chemist .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Technically, glass is solid.
Its molecules are rigidly bound and it is a non flowing, hard material.
IANAC (I am not a chemist.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001828</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003070</id>
	<title>Re:Ouch</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1265115480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think you're suffering from a lack of sense of scale. Here's <a href="http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/begin/cells/scale/" title="utah.edu">something to help</a> [utah.edu]. Zoom down to the ribosome level to get a sense of "30 atoms thick".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you 're suffering from a lack of sense of scale .
Here 's something to help [ utah.edu ] .
Zoom down to the ribosome level to get a sense of " 30 atoms thick " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you're suffering from a lack of sense of scale.
Here's something to help [utah.edu].
Zoom down to the ribosome level to get a sense of "30 atoms thick".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002462</id>
	<title>Ouch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265112120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So what happens when you get a fraction of a 30 atom thick splinter from this crap in your finger? or worse all over your body?  I don't even want to imagine what would happen if the surface were to shatter or splinter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what happens when you get a fraction of a 30 atom thick splinter from this crap in your finger ?
or worse all over your body ?
I do n't even want to imagine what would happen if the surface were to shatter or splinter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what happens when you get a fraction of a 30 atom thick splinter from this crap in your finger?
or worse all over your body?
I don't even want to imagine what would happen if the surface were to shatter or splinter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002548</id>
	<title>Re:bleach is great but focus on antibiotics</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1265112720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bleach is the nuke that people who are serious about killing bacteria use to clean their counters with.  Antibacterial cleaners are the things the amateurs at home use.</p><p>If you can satisfy the pros that they don't need to use bleach on their counters then the only remaining reason for anyone to use an antibacterial cleaner on his counter at home is superstition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bleach is the nuke that people who are serious about killing bacteria use to clean their counters with .
Antibacterial cleaners are the things the amateurs at home use.If you can satisfy the pros that they do n't need to use bleach on their counters then the only remaining reason for anyone to use an antibacterial cleaner on his counter at home is superstition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bleach is the nuke that people who are serious about killing bacteria use to clean their counters with.
Antibacterial cleaners are the things the amateurs at home use.If you can satisfy the pros that they don't need to use bleach on their counters then the only remaining reason for anyone to use an antibacterial cleaner on his counter at home is superstition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002030</id>
	<title>Possibly Risky But Highly Useful Nonetheless</title>
	<author>resistant</author>
	<datestamp>1265109720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I saw this news item as well, albeit at <a href="http://www.physorg.com/news184310039.html" title="physorg.com" rel="nofollow">PhysOrg</a> [physorg.com], which has linked a few interesting related articles. From the comments, it struck me that a concern is indeed the possibility that stray particles from applying this stuff might get into your lungs or on your eyes, causing all sorts of problems since it apparently binds well to organic substances. Also, one wonders what happens if the coating is degraded on food-handling surfaces. Do fragmented microparticles rip up your insides after being carried into your body within contaminated food?</p><p>Even with these concerns, of course, I'd love to test this stuff on various less risky surfaces, such as bathroom tiles and shop tools, with appropriate respiratory and eye protection. Being able to use it on a kitchen countertop would just be a welcome bonus if it turns out to be safe for that use after all. (As an aside, I think that use wouldn't breed resistant bacteria since it simply discourages any bacteria at all from growing on the protected surfaces). </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I saw this news item as well , albeit at PhysOrg [ physorg.com ] , which has linked a few interesting related articles .
From the comments , it struck me that a concern is indeed the possibility that stray particles from applying this stuff might get into your lungs or on your eyes , causing all sorts of problems since it apparently binds well to organic substances .
Also , one wonders what happens if the coating is degraded on food-handling surfaces .
Do fragmented microparticles rip up your insides after being carried into your body within contaminated food ? Even with these concerns , of course , I 'd love to test this stuff on various less risky surfaces , such as bathroom tiles and shop tools , with appropriate respiratory and eye protection .
Being able to use it on a kitchen countertop would just be a welcome bonus if it turns out to be safe for that use after all .
( As an aside , I think that use would n't breed resistant bacteria since it simply discourages any bacteria at all from growing on the protected surfaces ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I saw this news item as well, albeit at PhysOrg [physorg.com], which has linked a few interesting related articles.
From the comments, it struck me that a concern is indeed the possibility that stray particles from applying this stuff might get into your lungs or on your eyes, causing all sorts of problems since it apparently binds well to organic substances.
Also, one wonders what happens if the coating is degraded on food-handling surfaces.
Do fragmented microparticles rip up your insides after being carried into your body within contaminated food?Even with these concerns, of course, I'd love to test this stuff on various less risky surfaces, such as bathroom tiles and shop tools, with appropriate respiratory and eye protection.
Being able to use it on a kitchen countertop would just be a welcome bonus if it turns out to be safe for that use after all.
(As an aside, I think that use wouldn't breed resistant bacteria since it simply discourages any bacteria at all from growing on the protected surfaces). </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002758</id>
	<title>This is a quartz layer</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1265113920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Pure silicon dioxide, in its glass form, is quartz.  This is a scheme for putting a thin quartz film on other materials.  That's useful, but not revolutionary.  The big improvement here is that it's apparently applied as a liquid solution in air at room temperature, rather than having to be applied at molten quartz temperatures or in vacuum.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pure silicon dioxide , in its glass form , is quartz .
This is a scheme for putting a thin quartz film on other materials .
That 's useful , but not revolutionary .
The big improvement here is that it 's apparently applied as a liquid solution in air at room temperature , rather than having to be applied at molten quartz temperatures or in vacuum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Pure silicon dioxide, in its glass form, is quartz.
This is a scheme for putting a thin quartz film on other materials.
That's useful, but not revolutionary.
The big improvement here is that it's apparently applied as a liquid solution in air at room temperature, rather than having to be applied at molten quartz temperatures or in vacuum.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002538</id>
	<title>Re:Too Bad</title>
	<author>CannonballHead</author>
	<datestamp>1265112660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Alec Guinness was cool.  His movies always seemed to be rather sad at the end, though... seems "it" never worked out.  Man in the White Suit, Lavender Hill Mob, Ladykillers, and Kind Hearts and Cornets all ended rather badly for the main protagonist.  Among others.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Alec Guinness was cool .
His movies always seemed to be rather sad at the end , though... seems " it " never worked out .
Man in the White Suit , Lavender Hill Mob , Ladykillers , and Kind Hearts and Cornets all ended rather badly for the main protagonist .
Among others .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Alec Guinness was cool.
His movies always seemed to be rather sad at the end, though... seems "it" never worked out.
Man in the White Suit, Lavender Hill Mob, Ladykillers, and Kind Hearts and Cornets all ended rather badly for the main protagonist.
Among others.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002184</id>
	<title>Re:Think bigger</title>
	<author>Jane Q. Public</author>
	<datestamp>1265110500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dream on.
<br> <br>
While it might make a nice coat for the paint job, it is likely that a glass coating is not very suitable for parts that undergo sharp mechanical stresses, like the suspension.
<br> <br>
But more to the point: undercoats in general have been found to be a bad idea. They tend to encourage destructive corrosion wherever they are compromised, while parts without such an impermeable waterproof coating will rust more gracefully.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dream on .
While it might make a nice coat for the paint job , it is likely that a glass coating is not very suitable for parts that undergo sharp mechanical stresses , like the suspension .
But more to the point : undercoats in general have been found to be a bad idea .
They tend to encourage destructive corrosion wherever they are compromised , while parts without such an impermeable waterproof coating will rust more gracefully .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dream on.
While it might make a nice coat for the paint job, it is likely that a glass coating is not very suitable for parts that undergo sharp mechanical stresses, like the suspension.
But more to the point: undercoats in general have been found to be a bad idea.
They tend to encourage destructive corrosion wherever they are compromised, while parts without such an impermeable waterproof coating will rust more gracefully.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003486</id>
	<title>Re:winshield repair?</title>
	<author>ArundelCastle</author>
	<datestamp>1265117700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Even if your intent is just to fill the much smaller divots in the glass, 30 molecules thick isn't going to make much difference.</p></div><p>I think Trojan might disagree with that.<br>Going off on a tangent, I know, but exactly how flexible is that material?  Lots of people have latex allergies.  And if we leave the term "glass" off the packaging it could be appealing as an all-natural solution.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if your intent is just to fill the much smaller divots in the glass , 30 molecules thick is n't going to make much difference.I think Trojan might disagree with that.Going off on a tangent , I know , but exactly how flexible is that material ?
Lots of people have latex allergies .
And if we leave the term " glass " off the packaging it could be appealing as an all-natural solution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if your intent is just to fill the much smaller divots in the glass, 30 molecules thick isn't going to make much difference.I think Trojan might disagree with that.Going off on a tangent, I know, but exactly how flexible is that material?
Lots of people have latex allergies.
And if we leave the term "glass" off the packaging it could be appealing as an all-natural solution.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002160</id>
	<title>Chocolate hardening fat free coating for ice cream</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265110380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Gain no calories from your dessert with our secret hardening spray on topping!

Disclaimer:  may cause minor irritation of gums, tongue, esophagus, stomach, intestines and whatever else is left.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gain no calories from your dessert with our secret hardening spray on topping !
Disclaimer : may cause minor irritation of gums , tongue , esophagus , stomach , intestines and whatever else is left .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gain no calories from your dessert with our secret hardening spray on topping!
Disclaimer:  may cause minor irritation of gums, tongue, esophagus, stomach, intestines and whatever else is left.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003844</id>
	<title>Nano materials risks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265120100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a genuine concern about the influx of all these consumer grade products which contain Nano materials (as we all should). I get the distinct impression that corporations are putting the benefits of these materials way ahead of the potential health risks (surprised?).

Just off the top of my head...Apple's iPhone has a coating comprised of nano materials, many skin creams and make up now contain nano particles, etc. Where are the real studies that show there are no risks in using these materials directly with your skin and body? How can there be any credible tests that show long term results?

The sad thing is that 99.9\% of the people don't know or care about this. I fear that these materials will be the Asbestos of the 21st century that people of the future will look back on and shake their heads. Can any Slashdotters provide some good feedback or linkage on this matter? Appreciate any feedback.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a genuine concern about the influx of all these consumer grade products which contain Nano materials ( as we all should ) .
I get the distinct impression that corporations are putting the benefits of these materials way ahead of the potential health risks ( surprised ? ) .
Just off the top of my head...Apple 's iPhone has a coating comprised of nano materials , many skin creams and make up now contain nano particles , etc .
Where are the real studies that show there are no risks in using these materials directly with your skin and body ?
How can there be any credible tests that show long term results ?
The sad thing is that 99.9 \ % of the people do n't know or care about this .
I fear that these materials will be the Asbestos of the 21st century that people of the future will look back on and shake their heads .
Can any Slashdotters provide some good feedback or linkage on this matter ?
Appreciate any feedback .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a genuine concern about the influx of all these consumer grade products which contain Nano materials (as we all should).
I get the distinct impression that corporations are putting the benefits of these materials way ahead of the potential health risks (surprised?).
Just off the top of my head...Apple's iPhone has a coating comprised of nano materials, many skin creams and make up now contain nano particles, etc.
Where are the real studies that show there are no risks in using these materials directly with your skin and body?
How can there be any credible tests that show long term results?
The sad thing is that 99.9\% of the people don't know or care about this.
I fear that these materials will be the Asbestos of the 21st century that people of the future will look back on and shake their heads.
Can any Slashdotters provide some good feedback or linkage on this matter?
Appreciate any feedback.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002096</id>
	<title>Re:Very sweet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265110020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is not referring that you can snort or sniff the substance</p><p>Breathable in relation to permeable<br>This allows air to pass through while being too compact to allow water drops to enter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is not referring that you can snort or sniff the substanceBreathable in relation to permeableThis allows air to pass through while being too compact to allow water drops to enter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is not referring that you can snort or sniff the substanceBreathable in relation to permeableThis allows air to pass through while being too compact to allow water drops to enter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001800</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31017948</id>
	<title>Re:Think bigger</title>
	<author>budgenator</author>
	<datestamp>1264949640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Glass is pretty flexible when it's thin, they even make <a href="http://www.flex-a-form.com/" title="flex-a-form.com">automotive suspension springs</a> [flex-a-form.com] out of the stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Glass is pretty flexible when it 's thin , they even make automotive suspension springs [ flex-a-form.com ] out of the stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Glass is pretty flexible when it's thin, they even make automotive suspension springs [flex-a-form.com] out of the stuff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002240</id>
	<title>how breakable is it?</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1265110920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can spray it? "They called it misted glass!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can spray it ?
" They called it misted glass !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can spray it?
"They called it misted glass!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003056</id>
	<title>Re:Anti-graffiti?</title>
	<author>penguinchris</author>
	<datestamp>1265115420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sure there are similar things in other cities, but in Rochester, NY there's a privately-owned wall that the owner allows people to spray-paint whatever they want, whenever they want. Cool idea, but it's pretty much just 15-year-olds with long hair who get dropped off and picked up there by their mom in an SUV who actually paint it (meanwhile, graffiti thrives elsewhere in the city - such as in the abandoned subway tunnel).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure there are similar things in other cities , but in Rochester , NY there 's a privately-owned wall that the owner allows people to spray-paint whatever they want , whenever they want .
Cool idea , but it 's pretty much just 15-year-olds with long hair who get dropped off and picked up there by their mom in an SUV who actually paint it ( meanwhile , graffiti thrives elsewhere in the city - such as in the abandoned subway tunnel ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure there are similar things in other cities, but in Rochester, NY there's a privately-owned wall that the owner allows people to spray-paint whatever they want, whenever they want.
Cool idea, but it's pretty much just 15-year-olds with long hair who get dropped off and picked up there by their mom in an SUV who actually paint it (meanwhile, graffiti thrives elsewhere in the city - such as in the abandoned subway tunnel).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002108</id>
	<title>No information</title>
	<author>Geoffrey.landis</author>
	<datestamp>1265110080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anybody else notice that the article has essentially no information on what the stuff is?  One thing that it <i>isn't</i> is "we extract molecules of SiO2, and then we add the molecules to water or ethanol," which is what the article tries to imply-- you can't just "add" molecules of silicon dioxide to water, nor to alcohol.  So, just exactly what <i>is</i> it?</p><p>The actual press release from which this article seem to have been drawn is <a href="http://www.nanopool.eu/couk/index.htm" title="nanopool.eu">here</a> [nanopool.eu].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anybody else notice that the article has essentially no information on what the stuff is ?
One thing that it is n't is " we extract molecules of SiO2 , and then we add the molecules to water or ethanol , " which is what the article tries to imply-- you ca n't just " add " molecules of silicon dioxide to water , nor to alcohol .
So , just exactly what is it ? The actual press release from which this article seem to have been drawn is here [ nanopool.eu ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anybody else notice that the article has essentially no information on what the stuff is?
One thing that it isn't is "we extract molecules of SiO2, and then we add the molecules to water or ethanol," which is what the article tries to imply-- you can't just "add" molecules of silicon dioxide to water, nor to alcohol.
So, just exactly what is it?The actual press release from which this article seem to have been drawn is here [nanopool.eu].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002262</id>
	<title>Irving Mainway</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265111040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I call it "Can o' Glass".  Kids love glass, and kids love sprayin' stuff.  We just give the kids what they want.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I call it " Can o ' Glass " .
Kids love glass , and kids love sprayin ' stuff .
We just give the kids what they want .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I call it "Can o' Glass".
Kids love glass, and kids love sprayin' stuff.
We just give the kids what they want.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002766</id>
	<title>Dubious</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265113980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I first saw this reported here:</p><p>http://www.physorg.com/news184310039.html</p><p>at the end there was this drivel:</p><p>Liquid glass spray is perhaps the most important nanotechnology product to emerge to date. It will be available in DIY stores in Britain soon, with prices starting at around &pound;5 ($8 US). Other outlets, such as many supermarkets, may be unwilling to stock the products because they make enormous profits from cleaning products that need to be replaced regularly, and liquid glass would make virtually all of them obsolete.</p><p>It doesn't quote a source, so maybe it's just bad, really bad, reporting, but it sure has the sound of a snake oil sales pitch converted into copy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I first saw this reported here : http : //www.physorg.com/news184310039.htmlat the end there was this drivel : Liquid glass spray is perhaps the most important nanotechnology product to emerge to date .
It will be available in DIY stores in Britain soon , with prices starting at around   5 ( $ 8 US ) .
Other outlets , such as many supermarkets , may be unwilling to stock the products because they make enormous profits from cleaning products that need to be replaced regularly , and liquid glass would make virtually all of them obsolete.It does n't quote a source , so maybe it 's just bad , really bad , reporting , but it sure has the sound of a snake oil sales pitch converted into copy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I first saw this reported here:http://www.physorg.com/news184310039.htmlat the end there was this drivel:Liquid glass spray is perhaps the most important nanotechnology product to emerge to date.
It will be available in DIY stores in Britain soon, with prices starting at around £5 ($8 US).
Other outlets, such as many supermarkets, may be unwilling to stock the products because they make enormous profits from cleaning products that need to be replaced regularly, and liquid glass would make virtually all of them obsolete.It doesn't quote a source, so maybe it's just bad, really bad, reporting, but it sure has the sound of a snake oil sales pitch converted into copy.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002368</id>
	<title>Re:All glass is liquid</title>
	<author>StikyPad</author>
	<datestamp>1265111640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The reason old windows are thicker at the bottom is that they were built that way, for structural reasons.</i></p><p>That's just something fat old windows say to make themselves feel better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason old windows are thicker at the bottom is that they were built that way , for structural reasons.That 's just something fat old windows say to make themselves feel better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason old windows are thicker at the bottom is that they were built that way, for structural reasons.That's just something fat old windows say to make themselves feel better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002236</id>
	<title>Finally, Non-nutritive food shellac</title>
	<author>PinchDuck</author>
	<datestamp>1265110860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Somewhere, Clark Griswold is smiling.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Somewhere , Clark Griswold is smiling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somewhere, Clark Griswold is smiling.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31013148</id>
	<title>Re:Think bigger</title>
	<author>gravis777</author>
	<datestamp>1264967100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That depends - the glass is water resistant - is it shatterproof as well? Drive down a dirt road, and there goes your shiny expensive coating.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That depends - the glass is water resistant - is it shatterproof as well ?
Drive down a dirt road , and there goes your shiny expensive coating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That depends - the glass is water resistant - is it shatterproof as well?
Drive down a dirt road, and there goes your shiny expensive coating.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31017832</id>
	<title>Re:bleach is great but focus on antibiotics</title>
	<author>budgenator</author>
	<datestamp>1264948680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's what I use at work, 10\% bleach solution, cheap effective hospital grade disinfection without turning your counter tops into goo. Everything else that works as well seems to either soften plastics or embrittles them, and dissolves paint.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what I use at work , 10 \ % bleach solution , cheap effective hospital grade disinfection without turning your counter tops into goo .
Everything else that works as well seems to either soften plastics or embrittles them , and dissolves paint .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what I use at work, 10\% bleach solution, cheap effective hospital grade disinfection without turning your counter tops into goo.
Everything else that works as well seems to either soften plastics or embrittles them, and dissolves paint.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002380</id>
	<title>Re:Anti-graffiti?</title>
	<author>dwiget001</author>
	<datestamp>1265111700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This could lead to graffiti competitions!</p><p>Set up some wall, complete with owner's permission, spray this product on it, have the graffiti contestants go at it. Pictures taken, scores noted, wipe it down and then the next contestant does his/her thang.</p><p>There could be sponsorships, regional championships and the ultimate Graffiti Bowl (TM)!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This could lead to graffiti competitions ! Set up some wall , complete with owner 's permission , spray this product on it , have the graffiti contestants go at it .
Pictures taken , scores noted , wipe it down and then the next contestant does his/her thang.There could be sponsorships , regional championships and the ultimate Graffiti Bowl ( TM ) !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This could lead to graffiti competitions!Set up some wall, complete with owner's permission, spray this product on it, have the graffiti contestants go at it.
Pictures taken, scores noted, wipe it down and then the next contestant does his/her thang.There could be sponsorships, regional championships and the ultimate Graffiti Bowl (TM)!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002002</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31005998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31010674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31004516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31059008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31012910
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002392
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31013148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31004164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31017832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31012262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002334
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31006044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31010484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007012
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31008534
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31018068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31017948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31005924
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31006842
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31013188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31006196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31013110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31010782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002434
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002842
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002368
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31010558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31006722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_1922218_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002538
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007720
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003070
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003096
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003844
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002142
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002766
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001794
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002026
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002184
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31017948
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002358
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31006722
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003306
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31013148
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001992
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31012262
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002214
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31018068
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002854
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31012910
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003852
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31005998
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31006044
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31004164
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31059008
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31010674
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31013188
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002012
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002098
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002160
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31010484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002420
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002778
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002280
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003322
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31010558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002380
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31004516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003010
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002240
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007310
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002676
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002096
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002758
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002262
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001782
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002548
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31017832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007012
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31003238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31006196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002432
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31010782
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31008534
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31006842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002650
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001972
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002368
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31007996
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31001914
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31013110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31005924
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_1922218.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_1922218.31002500
</commentlist>
</conversation>
