<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_01_1933219</id>
	<title>Using Windows 7 RC? Pay Up Or Auto Shutdown Warned</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1265021040000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>CWmike writes with a warning that free preview copies of Windows 7 in the wild will start <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9150398/Windows\_7\_RC\_nears\_auto\_shutdown\_deadline\_Microsoft\_warns">nagging users to pay up</a> in a couple of weeks until ultimately shutting down the PC altogether in a month.  <i>"Microsoft unveiled the schedule for Windows 7 Release Candidate's retirement in May 2009, when it issued the early look to the public. At the time, it said Windows 7 RC would expire June 1, 2010. Before that date, however, users are to receive warnings of the impending end. Starting on Feb. 15, Windows 7 RC will display notices every few hours that the machine will <a href="http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/windows7/archive/2010/02/01/important-reminder-regarding-expiration-of-the-windows-7-rc.aspx">periodically shut down</a> beginning on March 1.  As of March 1, PCs running Windows 7 RC will automatically shut down every two hours. Those shutdowns will come without warning."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>CWmike writes with a warning that free preview copies of Windows 7 in the wild will start nagging users to pay up in a couple of weeks until ultimately shutting down the PC altogether in a month .
" Microsoft unveiled the schedule for Windows 7 Release Candidate 's retirement in May 2009 , when it issued the early look to the public .
At the time , it said Windows 7 RC would expire June 1 , 2010 .
Before that date , however , users are to receive warnings of the impending end .
Starting on Feb. 15 , Windows 7 RC will display notices every few hours that the machine will periodically shut down beginning on March 1 .
As of March 1 , PCs running Windows 7 RC will automatically shut down every two hours .
Those shutdowns will come without warning .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CWmike writes with a warning that free preview copies of Windows 7 in the wild will start nagging users to pay up in a couple of weeks until ultimately shutting down the PC altogether in a month.
"Microsoft unveiled the schedule for Windows 7 Release Candidate's retirement in May 2009, when it issued the early look to the public.
At the time, it said Windows 7 RC would expire June 1, 2010.
Before that date, however, users are to receive warnings of the impending end.
Starting on Feb. 15, Windows 7 RC will display notices every few hours that the machine will periodically shut down beginning on March 1.
As of March 1, PCs running Windows 7 RC will automatically shut down every two hours.
Those shutdowns will come without warning.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30994382</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1265122200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>My dad is a strange creature.... He buys the highest end laptop he can get/pay and then uses it for years.... The laptop the i7 replaced was a P-III 733MHz bought around 2000 or so... 10 years for a laptop.... Never seen anyone do that except my dad</i></p><p>It's a geezer thing; if it ain't broke, don't fix it. As long as it suits his needs, why should he replace it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My dad is a strange creature.... He buys the highest end laptop he can get/pay and then uses it for years.... The laptop the i7 replaced was a P-III 733MHz bought around 2000 or so... 10 years for a laptop.... Never seen anyone do that except my dadIt 's a geezer thing ; if it ai n't broke , do n't fix it .
As long as it suits his needs , why should he replace it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My dad is a strange creature.... He buys the highest end laptop he can get/pay and then uses it for years.... The laptop the i7 replaced was a P-III 733MHz bought around 2000 or so... 10 years for a laptop.... Never seen anyone do that except my dadIt's a geezer thing; if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
As long as it suits his needs, why should he replace it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992566</id>
	<title>Re:It's a good thing.</title>
	<author>Malc</author>
	<datestamp>1265102340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know why this is even a story.  It's a total waste of bandwidth.  This shutdown is part of the deal of using the RC.  Maybe there are people out there who downloaded it off bittorrent without realising it was limited, but then that's their own stupid fault.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know why this is even a story .
It 's a total waste of bandwidth .
This shutdown is part of the deal of using the RC .
Maybe there are people out there who downloaded it off bittorrent without realising it was limited , but then that 's their own stupid fault .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know why this is even a story.
It's a total waste of bandwidth.
This shutdown is part of the deal of using the RC.
Maybe there are people out there who downloaded it off bittorrent without realising it was limited, but then that's their own stupid fault.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988892</id>
	<title>It's a good thing.</title>
	<author>recoiledsnake</author>
	<datestamp>1265026500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since the RC doesn't get any updates, less vulnerable boxes in the wild is always good for all of us. Why is this being spun as a bad thing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since the RC does n't get any updates , less vulnerable boxes in the wild is always good for all of us .
Why is this being spun as a bad thing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since the RC doesn't get any updates, less vulnerable boxes in the wild is always good for all of us.
Why is this being spun as a bad thing?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608</id>
	<title>Re:What's different?</title>
	<author>swanzilla</author>
	<datestamp>1265025540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I see where you are going there...
<br>
<br>
In all honesty, when was the last time you saw a BSOD?  I have been running XP at work with 100\% uptime for years, and for quite a while kept a Vista dual-boot for streaming media at home with no issues.  At least tout the merits of something superior w/o resorting to tired anti M$ rhetoric.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I see where you are going there.. . In all honesty , when was the last time you saw a BSOD ?
I have been running XP at work with 100 \ % uptime for years , and for quite a while kept a Vista dual-boot for streaming media at home with no issues .
At least tout the merits of something superior w/o resorting to tired anti M $ rhetoric .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see where you are going there...


In all honesty, when was the last time you saw a BSOD?
I have been running XP at work with 100\% uptime for years, and for quite a while kept a Vista dual-boot for streaming media at home with no issues.
At least tout the merits of something superior w/o resorting to tired anti M$ rhetoric.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265025780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What surprises me more is that people are still using the RC.  Why would anyone do that?  I've seen 7 on my dads alienware(*) laptop.  Frankly, I wasn't impressed.  Feels like Vista, but a bit faster.  XP is not an option since he wants to use the full memory instead of being limited to 3.5Gig.  At least it doesn't feel sluggish, but on an i7 I wouldn't expect that.</p><p>(*) My dad is a strange creature.... He buys the highest end laptop he can get/pay and then uses it for years.... The laptop the i7 replaced was a P-III 733MHz bought around 2000 or so... 10 years for a laptop.... Never seen anyone do that except my dad<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-) </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What surprises me more is that people are still using the RC .
Why would anyone do that ?
I 've seen 7 on my dads alienware ( * ) laptop .
Frankly , I was n't impressed .
Feels like Vista , but a bit faster .
XP is not an option since he wants to use the full memory instead of being limited to 3.5Gig .
At least it does n't feel sluggish , but on an i7 I would n't expect that .
( * ) My dad is a strange creature.... He buys the highest end laptop he can get/pay and then uses it for years.... The laptop the i7 replaced was a P-III 733MHz bought around 2000 or so... 10 years for a laptop.... Never seen anyone do that except my dad ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What surprises me more is that people are still using the RC.
Why would anyone do that?
I've seen 7 on my dads alienware(*) laptop.
Frankly, I wasn't impressed.
Feels like Vista, but a bit faster.
XP is not an option since he wants to use the full memory instead of being limited to 3.5Gig.
At least it doesn't feel sluggish, but on an i7 I wouldn't expect that.
(*) My dad is a strange creature.... He buys the highest end laptop he can get/pay and then uses it for years.... The laptop the i7 replaced was a P-III 733MHz bought around 2000 or so... 10 years for a laptop.... Never seen anyone do that except my dad ;-) </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990836</id>
	<title>Re:Open Source/Linux's Failure To Capitalize</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265038260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know this is going to sound mean.  (Yay for the troll) but you do realize that World of Warcraft runs just fine on Linux, right?.  I don't play it, but I've helped a bunch of people set it up under Linux.</p><p>I'd suggest saying something like, "... and Impulse Powered games on his windows partition he doesn't tell anyone about..." Wait, that doesn't cover me either.  I guess I just don't game enough.  You know, the beauty of open source is that if you wanted badly enough to fix something, you could.  Apparently, it just isn't important enough to you.  And don't say "But I can't code?"  I couldn't either.  I'm still learning.  If it really was that important to you, you could find a way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know this is going to sound mean .
( Yay for the troll ) but you do realize that World of Warcraft runs just fine on Linux , right ? .
I do n't play it , but I 've helped a bunch of people set it up under Linux.I 'd suggest saying something like , " ... and Impulse Powered games on his windows partition he does n't tell anyone about... " Wait , that does n't cover me either .
I guess I just do n't game enough .
You know , the beauty of open source is that if you wanted badly enough to fix something , you could .
Apparently , it just is n't important enough to you .
And do n't say " But I ca n't code ?
" I could n't either .
I 'm still learning .
If it really was that important to you , you could find a way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know this is going to sound mean.
(Yay for the troll) but you do realize that World of Warcraft runs just fine on Linux, right?.
I don't play it, but I've helped a bunch of people set it up under Linux.I'd suggest saying something like, "... and Impulse Powered games on his windows partition he doesn't tell anyone about..." Wait, that doesn't cover me either.
I guess I just don't game enough.
You know, the beauty of open source is that if you wanted badly enough to fix something, you could.
Apparently, it just isn't important enough to you.
And don't say "But I can't code?
"  I couldn't either.
I'm still learning.
If it really was that important to you, you could find a way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990822</id>
	<title>Re:I'm glad there's no bias in the reporting on /.</title>
	<author>thePowerOfGrayskull</author>
	<datestamp>1265038200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's nothing anti-anything up there. There's no opinion.</p><p>I think *you* need to *read* the summary again without bias.</p></div><p>It's pretty subtle, but there's no denying it's there. Consider this phrasing which conveys the exact same facts:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Windows 7 RC systems will begin issuing warnings of pending expiration on February 15th.  As originally stated by Microsoft at [this link] back in March 2009, expired RC installations will cease normal operations as of March 1.  Beginning from point, they will shut down at irregular intervals.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's nothing anti-anything up there .
There 's no opinion.I think * you * need to * read * the summary again without bias.It 's pretty subtle , but there 's no denying it 's there .
Consider this phrasing which conveys the exact same facts : Windows 7 RC systems will begin issuing warnings of pending expiration on February 15th .
As originally stated by Microsoft at [ this link ] back in March 2009 , expired RC installations will cease normal operations as of March 1 .
Beginning from point , they will shut down at irregular intervals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's nothing anti-anything up there.
There's no opinion.I think *you* need to *read* the summary again without bias.It's pretty subtle, but there's no denying it's there.
Consider this phrasing which conveys the exact same facts:Windows 7 RC systems will begin issuing warnings of pending expiration on February 15th.
As originally stated by Microsoft at [this link] back in March 2009, expired RC installations will cease normal operations as of March 1.
Beginning from point, they will shut down at irregular intervals.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989176</id>
	<title>Re:What service....</title>
	<author>mobby\_6kl</author>
	<datestamp>1265027760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><tt>shutdown -a</tt> aborts any current shutdown porcess, so it's almost as good. You just need to be quick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>shutdown -a aborts any current shutdown porcess , so it 's almost as good .
You just need to be quick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>shutdown -a aborts any current shutdown porcess, so it's almost as good.
You just need to be quick.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991464</id>
	<title>Oh for the love of........</title>
	<author>jaronc</author>
	<datestamp>1265044320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't this story perhaps a little hysterical?  When the RC came out they were very clear that this would happen, they even gave the dates.  They were also very clear you may not be able to upgrade from the RC.</p><p>Now it's about to happen and people are surprised?  People agreed to help test an RC and in return they got almost a years worth of free use out of a fairly stable OS.  Trials over, pay up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this story perhaps a little hysterical ?
When the RC came out they were very clear that this would happen , they even gave the dates .
They were also very clear you may not be able to upgrade from the RC.Now it 's about to happen and people are surprised ?
People agreed to help test an RC and in return they got almost a years worth of free use out of a fairly stable OS .
Trials over , pay up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this story perhaps a little hysterical?
When the RC came out they were very clear that this would happen, they even gave the dates.
They were also very clear you may not be able to upgrade from the RC.Now it's about to happen and people are surprised?
People agreed to help test an RC and in return they got almost a years worth of free use out of a fairly stable OS.
Trials over, pay up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988994</id>
	<title>Similar problem found by Ed Bott and solved</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265027040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2729&amp;utm\_source=feedburner&amp;utm\_medium=feed&amp;utm\_campaign=Feed\%3A+EdBott-WindowsandOfficeExpertise+\%28Ed+Bott+-+Windows+\%28and+Office\%29+Expertise\%29&amp;utm\_content=FeedBurner</p><p>'twas a hardware issue, related to interactions between the network cable and the switch. Maybe related to yours, maybe not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.edbott.com/weblog/ ? p = 2729&amp;utm \ _source = feedburner&amp;utm \ _medium = feed&amp;utm \ _campaign = Feed \ % 3A + EdBott-WindowsandOfficeExpertise + \ % 28Ed + Bott + - + Windows + \ % 28and + Office \ % 29 + Expertise \ % 29&amp;utm \ _content = FeedBurner't was a hardware issue , related to interactions between the network cable and the switch .
Maybe related to yours , maybe not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2729&amp;utm\_source=feedburner&amp;utm\_medium=feed&amp;utm\_campaign=Feed\%3A+EdBott-WindowsandOfficeExpertise+\%28Ed+Bott+-+Windows+\%28and+Office\%29+Expertise\%29&amp;utm\_content=FeedBurner'twas a hardware issue, related to interactions between the network cable and the switch.
Maybe related to yours, maybe not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990486</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>petermgreen</author>
	<datestamp>1265035800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm running it fine on two computers in my office at the moment. One is a dell vostro 420 with 8GB of ram, the other is a custom built box* with 48GB of ram. Both have been running for considerably longer than a week.</p><p>I've also run it briefly on an optiplex 755 but ran into the issue of lack of support for the altera paralell port dongles I was using at the time.</p><p>Driver wise the custom build box was the easiest since both nvidia and intel officially support it. The dells were trickier to find drivers for (especially the vostro since despite supporting 8GB of ram dell doesn't officially support ANY 64-bit OS on it!) but once the drivers were found they seem to run fine (though I do run the SATA interfaces in compatability mode to avoid the need to mess arround with slipstreaming or F6 floppies).</p><p>* Intel SC5520SC motherboard, 2x 2.4GHz xeon 5500 series processors, intel SC5650WS case, some low end nvidia graphics card, two 1TB HDDs, some cheap sony DVD writer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm running it fine on two computers in my office at the moment .
One is a dell vostro 420 with 8GB of ram , the other is a custom built box * with 48GB of ram .
Both have been running for considerably longer than a week.I 've also run it briefly on an optiplex 755 but ran into the issue of lack of support for the altera paralell port dongles I was using at the time.Driver wise the custom build box was the easiest since both nvidia and intel officially support it .
The dells were trickier to find drivers for ( especially the vostro since despite supporting 8GB of ram dell does n't officially support ANY 64-bit OS on it !
) but once the drivers were found they seem to run fine ( though I do run the SATA interfaces in compatability mode to avoid the need to mess arround with slipstreaming or F6 floppies ) .
* Intel SC5520SC motherboard , 2x 2.4GHz xeon 5500 series processors , intel SC5650WS case , some low end nvidia graphics card , two 1TB HDDs , some cheap sony DVD writer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm running it fine on two computers in my office at the moment.
One is a dell vostro 420 with 8GB of ram, the other is a custom built box* with 48GB of ram.
Both have been running for considerably longer than a week.I've also run it briefly on an optiplex 755 but ran into the issue of lack of support for the altera paralell port dongles I was using at the time.Driver wise the custom build box was the easiest since both nvidia and intel officially support it.
The dells were trickier to find drivers for (especially the vostro since despite supporting 8GB of ram dell doesn't officially support ANY 64-bit OS on it!
) but once the drivers were found they seem to run fine (though I do run the SATA interfaces in compatability mode to avoid the need to mess arround with slipstreaming or F6 floppies).
* Intel SC5520SC motherboard, 2x 2.4GHz xeon 5500 series processors, intel SC5650WS case, some low end nvidia graphics card, two 1TB HDDs, some cheap sony DVD writer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989352</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>eriklou</author>
	<datestamp>1265028540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, I lit it on fire myself after I couldn't find jack for drivers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , I lit it on fire myself after I could n't find jack for drivers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, I lit it on fire myself after I couldn't find jack for drivers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990088</id>
	<title>Re:..so?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265032740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is "entirely credible free alternative" a Freudian slip or did you mean entirely free credible alternatives?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is " entirely credible free alternative " a Freudian slip or did you mean entirely free credible alternatives ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is "entirely credible free alternative" a Freudian slip or did you mean entirely free credible alternatives?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989610</id>
	<title>Re:Microsoft getting free ride</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265029860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't help but think that the shutdown process is the regular windows shutdown process.  Meaning that services and applications are shutdown and your POS backend that you are running on a beta OS will not be endangered.  It isn't like gnomes hit the reset  button or something (though that feature was available in ME).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't help but think that the shutdown process is the regular windows shutdown process .
Meaning that services and applications are shutdown and your POS backend that you are running on a beta OS will not be endangered .
It is n't like gnomes hit the reset button or something ( though that feature was available in ME ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't help but think that the shutdown process is the regular windows shutdown process.
Meaning that services and applications are shutdown and your POS backend that you are running on a beta OS will not be endangered.
It isn't like gnomes hit the reset  button or something (though that feature was available in ME).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989624</id>
	<title>The most secure windows yet</title>
	<author>thewils</author>
	<datestamp>1265029980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It just powers off. Hack that China!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It just powers off .
Hack that China !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It just powers off.
Hack that China!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.31004886</id>
	<title>Re:Oh wow!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265126880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find multiple desktops usable when I'm listening to something that cannot be removed from the task list, say a stream on a webpage. Have that running on a separate desktop, and it no longer appears in the alt-tab list on the main desktop. Good times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find multiple desktops usable when I 'm listening to something that can not be removed from the task list , say a stream on a webpage .
Have that running on a separate desktop , and it no longer appears in the alt-tab list on the main desktop .
Good times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find multiple desktops usable when I'm listening to something that cannot be removed from the task list, say a stream on a webpage.
Have that running on a separate desktop, and it no longer appears in the alt-tab list on the main desktop.
Good times.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30993094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989634</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>drsmithy</author>
	<datestamp>1265030100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>CPUs aren't getting much faster quickly, ditto video cards [...]</i>
</p><p>Actually, they are, it's just that typical requirements are plateauing.
</p><p> <i>Really, I don't know who came up with the idea that PCs should be replaced annually or even every two years or so. </i>
</p><p>No-one outside of enthusiasts does this.  Businesses typically work on a 3-5 year cycle, and home users frequently even longer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>CPUs are n't getting much faster quickly , ditto video cards [ ... ] Actually , they are , it 's just that typical requirements are plateauing .
Really , I do n't know who came up with the idea that PCs should be replaced annually or even every two years or so .
No-one outside of enthusiasts does this .
Businesses typically work on a 3-5 year cycle , and home users frequently even longer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> CPUs aren't getting much faster quickly, ditto video cards [...]
Actually, they are, it's just that typical requirements are plateauing.
Really, I don't know who came up with the idea that PCs should be replaced annually or even every two years or so.
No-one outside of enthusiasts does this.
Businesses typically work on a 3-5 year cycle, and home users frequently even longer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992082</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265051820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Im probably going to have to do that with my netbook. I bought it last year when the n280 came out.  now that msi and asus are making amd and ARM netbooks and tablets, I have no reason to use atom devices.  Ill keep it till it breaks, but that will be probably in a year.</p><p>a student who is at school or work for 50 hours a week will wear even the hardiest computer out</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Im probably going to have to do that with my netbook .
I bought it last year when the n280 came out .
now that msi and asus are making amd and ARM netbooks and tablets , I have no reason to use atom devices .
Ill keep it till it breaks , but that will be probably in a year.a student who is at school or work for 50 hours a week will wear even the hardiest computer out</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Im probably going to have to do that with my netbook.
I bought it last year when the n280 came out.
now that msi and asus are making amd and ARM netbooks and tablets, I have no reason to use atom devices.
Ill keep it till it breaks, but that will be probably in a year.a student who is at school or work for 50 hours a week will wear even the hardiest computer out</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990198</id>
	<title>Ahhh... the microsoft motto</title>
	<author>Exception Duck</author>
	<datestamp>1265033520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ahhh... the microsoft motto</p><p>Be evil.</p><p>There is no other way to put this</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahhh... the microsoft mottoBe evil.There is no other way to put this</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahhh... the microsoft mottoBe evil.There is no other way to put this</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30994364</id>
	<title>seriously f*cked up</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1265122080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Leave it to M$ to go even further at alienating their customers and making them feel like they made a bad choice. This is exactly what I hate about M$!</p><p>1 year ago<br>M$&gt; Hey! i have this great new product for you to use for free, to give us some feedback on how you like the experience and t help us find the bugs.<br>Client&gt;Great, nice, sweet....i will try it out, is there any catch...?<br>M$&gt; Of course not, what do you think we are, we just want to make our mark on the world as we are losing so much ground to our competitors...<br>Client&gt; Ok...</p><p>Present day<br>M$&gt;Ok now pay up...<br>Client&gt; For what? you said it was free....???<br>M$&gt;Well , that was back then, and i need a new pool, pay up or i shut down your pc and you wont be able to access all your important files<br>Client&gt;That sucks....<br>no response, as PC has shutdown without warning...</p><p>Client&gt;That REALLY sucks....<br>M$ reboots<br>M$&gt;Ok are you ready to pay up now....?<br>Client&gt;Let me get this straight, I help you out with finding your bugs on a version you gave to me for free....and now you want me to pay to be able to access my files that are already on my own PC?<br>no response, as PC has shutdown without warning...</p><p>Client&gt; Screw this, I can see why everybody is moving to Mac! Guess it is time to go shopping.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Leave it to M $ to go even further at alienating their customers and making them feel like they made a bad choice .
This is exactly what I hate about M $ ! 1 year agoM $ &gt; Hey !
i have this great new product for you to use for free , to give us some feedback on how you like the experience and t help us find the bugs.Client &gt; Great , nice , sweet....i will try it out , is there any catch... ? M $ &gt; Of course not , what do you think we are , we just want to make our mark on the world as we are losing so much ground to our competitors...Client &gt; Ok...Present dayM $ &gt; Ok now pay up...Client &gt; For what ?
you said it was free.... ? ?
? M $ &gt; Well , that was back then , and i need a new pool , pay up or i shut down your pc and you wont be able to access all your important filesClient &gt; That sucks....no response , as PC has shutdown without warning...Client &gt; That REALLY sucks....M $ rebootsM $ &gt; Ok are you ready to pay up now.... ? Client &gt; Let me get this straight , I help you out with finding your bugs on a version you gave to me for free....and now you want me to pay to be able to access my files that are already on my own PC ? no response , as PC has shutdown without warning...Client &gt; Screw this , I can see why everybody is moving to Mac !
Guess it is time to go shopping .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Leave it to M$ to go even further at alienating their customers and making them feel like they made a bad choice.
This is exactly what I hate about M$!1 year agoM$&gt; Hey!
i have this great new product for you to use for free, to give us some feedback on how you like the experience and t help us find the bugs.Client&gt;Great, nice, sweet....i will try it out, is there any catch...?M$&gt; Of course not, what do you think we are, we just want to make our mark on the world as we are losing so much ground to our competitors...Client&gt; Ok...Present dayM$&gt;Ok now pay up...Client&gt; For what?
you said it was free....??
?M$&gt;Well , that was back then, and i need a new pool, pay up or i shut down your pc and you wont be able to access all your important filesClient&gt;That sucks....no response, as PC has shutdown without warning...Client&gt;That REALLY sucks....M$ rebootsM$&gt;Ok are you ready to pay up now....?Client&gt;Let me get this straight, I help you out with finding your bugs on a version you gave to me for free....and now you want me to pay to be able to access my files that are already on my own PC?no response, as PC has shutdown without warning...Client&gt; Screw this, I can see why everybody is moving to Mac!
Guess it is time to go shopping.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990674</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>flappinbooger</author>
	<datestamp>1265037120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dollars per year was probably about the same for him (or less) than buying 3 cheap-o laptops in 10 years...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dollars per year was probably about the same for him ( or less ) than buying 3 cheap-o laptops in 10 years.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dollars per year was probably about the same for him (or less) than buying 3 cheap-o laptops in 10 years...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988770</id>
	<title>Win 7 RC was good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265026020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had used it since last May until last December when I bought a discounted ultimate version for $30. The RC had almost everything the final version had, and it was nice for me to be able to try it out before paying for it (and finding a deal). I have no complaint for something that was free for half a year and as high quality as the official version</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had used it since last May until last December when I bought a discounted ultimate version for $ 30 .
The RC had almost everything the final version had , and it was nice for me to be able to try it out before paying for it ( and finding a deal ) .
I have no complaint for something that was free for half a year and as high quality as the official version</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had used it since last May until last December when I bought a discounted ultimate version for $30.
The RC had almost everything the final version had, and it was nice for me to be able to try it out before paying for it (and finding a deal).
I have no complaint for something that was free for half a year and as high quality as the official version</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989270</id>
	<title>Re:Oh wow!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265028240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>[...] and an eternal stream of patches and bandages!</p></div><p>I can grant you the rest, but if you're not installing periodic updates and patches on ANY operating system, be it Linux, *BSD, OS X, or Windows, either you or the distributor are doing something horribly wrong, and we're not cleaning up your mess for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ ... ] and an eternal stream of patches and bandages ! I can grant you the rest , but if you 're not installing periodic updates and patches on ANY operating system , be it Linux , * BSD , OS X , or Windows , either you or the distributor are doing something horribly wrong , and we 're not cleaning up your mess for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[...] and an eternal stream of patches and bandages!I can grant you the rest, but if you're not installing periodic updates and patches on ANY operating system, be it Linux, *BSD, OS X, or Windows, either you or the distributor are doing something horribly wrong, and we're not cleaning up your mess for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989056</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>tlhIngan</author>
	<datestamp>1265027280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What surprises me more is that people are still using the RC. Why would anyone do that? I've seen 7 on my dads alienware(*) laptop. Frankly, I wasn't impressed. Feels like Vista, but a bit faster. XP is not an option since he wants to use the full memory instead of being limited to 3.5Gig. At least it doesn't feel sluggish, but on an i7 I wouldn't expect that.</p><p>(*) My dad is a strange creature.... He buys the highest end laptop he can get/pay and then uses it for years.... The laptop the i7 replaced was a P-III 733MHz bought around 2000 or so... 10 years for a laptop.... Never seen anyone do that except my dad<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></div></blockquote><p>Not unusual. I do the same thing. It's a sore PITA to keep replacing computers - if you go white box, figuring out what parts you want in it is practically a full time job. If you go OEM, well, then you get stuck with parts you aren't happy with.</p><p>I gave up, and still run my nearly 10-year-old Celeron 533A (overclocked to 800MHz, back when it was the normal thing to do). I did pick up a couple of better computers along the way - a Mac Pro and a nice Core 2 Extreme laptop, but my old PC still runs fine. Especially since these days, any decent PC will last a really long time if you exclude gaming. CPUs aren't getting much faster quickly, ditto video cards... so even moderate gaming will work on decent high-end machines for years to come.</p><p>Really, I don't know who came up with the idea that PCs should be replaced annually or even every two years or so. Moving all that data gets to be a huge chore, as is having to dig up all your installation CDs and setup programs and registration keys, and other crap. If you're well organized, it's easy. But most people aren't, and most people don't backup at all. And I have a small pile of hard drives I've removed from old PCs that may have unrecovered data.</p><p>As for Windows 7 RC, it's actually a great solution to two problems. First are those who sold PCs with "Windows 7" prior to release to notify people they don't have a legitimate copy anymore. The second problem is when a PC gets installed with Windows 7 to evaluate, and is promptly forgotten about or even inventoried that it has Win7 RC. Well, hopefully when people get around to seeing that machine again, they'll realize that machine really ought to be re-imaged.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What surprises me more is that people are still using the RC .
Why would anyone do that ?
I 've seen 7 on my dads alienware ( * ) laptop .
Frankly , I was n't impressed .
Feels like Vista , but a bit faster .
XP is not an option since he wants to use the full memory instead of being limited to 3.5Gig .
At least it does n't feel sluggish , but on an i7 I would n't expect that .
( * ) My dad is a strange creature.... He buys the highest end laptop he can get/pay and then uses it for years.... The laptop the i7 replaced was a P-III 733MHz bought around 2000 or so... 10 years for a laptop.... Never seen anyone do that except my dad ; - ) Not unusual .
I do the same thing .
It 's a sore PITA to keep replacing computers - if you go white box , figuring out what parts you want in it is practically a full time job .
If you go OEM , well , then you get stuck with parts you are n't happy with.I gave up , and still run my nearly 10-year-old Celeron 533A ( overclocked to 800MHz , back when it was the normal thing to do ) .
I did pick up a couple of better computers along the way - a Mac Pro and a nice Core 2 Extreme laptop , but my old PC still runs fine .
Especially since these days , any decent PC will last a really long time if you exclude gaming .
CPUs are n't getting much faster quickly , ditto video cards... so even moderate gaming will work on decent high-end machines for years to come.Really , I do n't know who came up with the idea that PCs should be replaced annually or even every two years or so .
Moving all that data gets to be a huge chore , as is having to dig up all your installation CDs and setup programs and registration keys , and other crap .
If you 're well organized , it 's easy .
But most people are n't , and most people do n't backup at all .
And I have a small pile of hard drives I 've removed from old PCs that may have unrecovered data.As for Windows 7 RC , it 's actually a great solution to two problems .
First are those who sold PCs with " Windows 7 " prior to release to notify people they do n't have a legitimate copy anymore .
The second problem is when a PC gets installed with Windows 7 to evaluate , and is promptly forgotten about or even inventoried that it has Win7 RC .
Well , hopefully when people get around to seeing that machine again , they 'll realize that machine really ought to be re-imaged .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What surprises me more is that people are still using the RC.
Why would anyone do that?
I've seen 7 on my dads alienware(*) laptop.
Frankly, I wasn't impressed.
Feels like Vista, but a bit faster.
XP is not an option since he wants to use the full memory instead of being limited to 3.5Gig.
At least it doesn't feel sluggish, but on an i7 I wouldn't expect that.
(*) My dad is a strange creature.... He buys the highest end laptop he can get/pay and then uses it for years.... The laptop the i7 replaced was a P-III 733MHz bought around 2000 or so... 10 years for a laptop.... Never seen anyone do that except my dad ;-)Not unusual.
I do the same thing.
It's a sore PITA to keep replacing computers - if you go white box, figuring out what parts you want in it is practically a full time job.
If you go OEM, well, then you get stuck with parts you aren't happy with.I gave up, and still run my nearly 10-year-old Celeron 533A (overclocked to 800MHz, back when it was the normal thing to do).
I did pick up a couple of better computers along the way - a Mac Pro and a nice Core 2 Extreme laptop, but my old PC still runs fine.
Especially since these days, any decent PC will last a really long time if you exclude gaming.
CPUs aren't getting much faster quickly, ditto video cards... so even moderate gaming will work on decent high-end machines for years to come.Really, I don't know who came up with the idea that PCs should be replaced annually or even every two years or so.
Moving all that data gets to be a huge chore, as is having to dig up all your installation CDs and setup programs and registration keys, and other crap.
If you're well organized, it's easy.
But most people aren't, and most people don't backup at all.
And I have a small pile of hard drives I've removed from old PCs that may have unrecovered data.As for Windows 7 RC, it's actually a great solution to two problems.
First are those who sold PCs with "Windows 7" prior to release to notify people they don't have a legitimate copy anymore.
The second problem is when a PC gets installed with Windows 7 to evaluate, and is promptly forgotten about or even inventoried that it has Win7 RC.
Well, hopefully when people get around to seeing that machine again, they'll realize that machine really ought to be re-imaged.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988700</id>
	<title>Re:I'm glad there's no bias in the reporting on /.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265025840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's nothing anti-anything up there. There's no opinion.</p><p>I think *you* need to *read* the summary again without bias.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's nothing anti-anything up there .
There 's no opinion.I think * you * need to * read * the summary again without bias .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's nothing anti-anything up there.
There's no opinion.I think *you* need to *read* the summary again without bias.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988540</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988860</id>
	<title>Slashdot moderation flaws</title>
	<author>heffrey</author>
	<datestamp>1265026380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What a truly lame story. The biggest flaw with the moderation system is that I can't use my mod points to moderate on the actual stories as well as the comments!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What a truly lame story .
The biggest flaw with the moderation system is that I ca n't use my mod points to moderate on the actual stories as well as the comments !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What a truly lame story.
The biggest flaw with the moderation system is that I can't use my mod points to moderate on the actual stories as well as the comments!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.31001484</id>
	<title>Hi, I'm a PC</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1265106600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><strong>After all that registration and setup work, turns out my wife likes Win7 but "hates" the new ribbon interface of Office2007 and wanted Office97 back.  I can't find my Office97 CD, so I installed the latest Open Office hoping they didn't do the ribbon interface thing.  OOO-Calc still offers a more familiar drop-down interface to my veteran Excel user than the new Excel.  Hopefully OOO-Calc will leave the interface fairly stable as it moves forward.</strong></htmltext>
<tokenext>After all that registration and setup work , turns out my wife likes Win7 but " hates " the new ribbon interface of Office2007 and wanted Office97 back .
I ca n't find my Office97 CD , so I installed the latest Open Office hoping they did n't do the ribbon interface thing .
OOO-Calc still offers a more familiar drop-down interface to my veteran Excel user than the new Excel .
Hopefully OOO-Calc will leave the interface fairly stable as it moves forward .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After all that registration and setup work, turns out my wife likes Win7 but "hates" the new ribbon interface of Office2007 and wanted Office97 back.
I can't find my Office97 CD, so I installed the latest Open Office hoping they didn't do the ribbon interface thing.
OOO-Calc still offers a more familiar drop-down interface to my veteran Excel user than the new Excel.
Hopefully OOO-Calc will leave the interface fairly stable as it moves forward.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988850</id>
	<title>Re:..so?</title>
	<author>Kpau</author>
	<datestamp>1265026380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Everyone who got an RC knows this (or should).  DuH?  It was a great free ride while it lasted.  My game machine upgrade will include a win7 OS.  My work machine will continue as an Ubuntu critter... so it goes<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone who got an RC knows this ( or should ) .
DuH ? It was a great free ride while it lasted .
My game machine upgrade will include a win7 OS .
My work machine will continue as an Ubuntu critter... so it goes : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone who got an RC knows this (or should).
DuH?  It was a great free ride while it lasted.
My game machine upgrade will include a win7 OS.
My work machine will continue as an Ubuntu critter... so it goes :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990366</id>
	<title>Re:Slashdot moderation flaws</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1265034900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're logged in, there are buttons to vote a story up and down in the firehose. I'm not sure they do anything once the story hits the front page, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're logged in , there are buttons to vote a story up and down in the firehose .
I 'm not sure they do anything once the story hits the front page , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're logged in, there are buttons to vote a story up and down in the firehose.
I'm not sure they do anything once the story hits the front page, though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30993064</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7 networking woes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265111040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> On a gigabyte network I can not get better than 100mbs performance, while the Linux and XP machines perform as expected.</p></div><p>Please tell me who I contact to get a gigabyte network.</p><p>Perhaps Doc Brown can direct me to a man who can provide me with such a network.  I imagine it would be able to stream a jigawatt of power as well.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>On a gigabyte network I can not get better than 100mbs performance , while the Linux and XP machines perform as expected.Please tell me who I contact to get a gigabyte network.Perhaps Doc Brown can direct me to a man who can provide me with such a network .
I imagine it would be able to stream a jigawatt of power as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> On a gigabyte network I can not get better than 100mbs performance, while the Linux and XP machines perform as expected.Please tell me who I contact to get a gigabyte network.Perhaps Doc Brown can direct me to a man who can provide me with such a network.
I imagine it would be able to stream a jigawatt of power as well.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992626</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7 networking woes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265103240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really? I'm getting somewhat opposite here. I have a few machines here running Windows XP, a few running Linux, one stuck on Vista, and my own personal gaming box is a W7/XP dualboot.</p><p>Performance has been W7/Linux at the top, with XP down somewhat, and Vista showing the worst performance on network transfers.</p><p>I'd say the chipset and drivers are inclined to make a big difference here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
I 'm getting somewhat opposite here .
I have a few machines here running Windows XP , a few running Linux , one stuck on Vista , and my own personal gaming box is a W7/XP dualboot.Performance has been W7/Linux at the top , with XP down somewhat , and Vista showing the worst performance on network transfers.I 'd say the chipset and drivers are inclined to make a big difference here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
I'm getting somewhat opposite here.
I have a few machines here running Windows XP, a few running Linux, one stuck on Vista, and my own personal gaming box is a W7/XP dualboot.Performance has been W7/Linux at the top, with XP down somewhat, and Vista showing the worst performance on network transfers.I'd say the chipset and drivers are inclined to make a big difference here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30996380</id>
	<title>Re:As a current user of it</title>
	<author>Lisandro</author>
	<datestamp>1265130060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The average Windows user will just accept it's ok for his computer to reboot after a couple of hours. The ones that know better will simply patch the OS.</p><p>So, in a nutshell, sadly it won't make any difference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The average Windows user will just accept it 's ok for his computer to reboot after a couple of hours .
The ones that know better will simply patch the OS.So , in a nutshell , sadly it wo n't make any difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The average Windows user will just accept it's ok for his computer to reboot after a couple of hours.
The ones that know better will simply patch the OS.So, in a nutshell, sadly it won't make any difference.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30994996</id>
	<title>Re:Ask Slashdot:</title>
	<author>secretcurse</author>
	<datestamp>1265125200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In what way is 7 still a giant kludge?  I've been running it since the beta started, and it works really well.  I think it's the best OS Microsoft has released since XP, and is a great improvement over XP.  And no, I'm not an MS fanboy, I use Ubuntu on my desktop about 60\% of the time, and my laptop is a MacBook Pro.  Both boxes run Windows 7.  Mac OS, Windows, and Linux area all 3 great for some things and shitty for others.  Why can't we all agree on that?</htmltext>
<tokenext>In what way is 7 still a giant kludge ?
I 've been running it since the beta started , and it works really well .
I think it 's the best OS Microsoft has released since XP , and is a great improvement over XP .
And no , I 'm not an MS fanboy , I use Ubuntu on my desktop about 60 \ % of the time , and my laptop is a MacBook Pro .
Both boxes run Windows 7 .
Mac OS , Windows , and Linux area all 3 great for some things and shitty for others .
Why ca n't we all agree on that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In what way is 7 still a giant kludge?
I've been running it since the beta started, and it works really well.
I think it's the best OS Microsoft has released since XP, and is a great improvement over XP.
And no, I'm not an MS fanboy, I use Ubuntu on my desktop about 60\% of the time, and my laptop is a MacBook Pro.
Both boxes run Windows 7.
Mac OS, Windows, and Linux area all 3 great for some things and shitty for others.
Why can't we all agree on that?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989574</id>
	<title>You get free OS</title>
	<author>DogDude</author>
	<datestamp>1265029740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh, puh-lease.  Anybody using the RC gets a free ride in that they get to test the OS and test their software with the OS for free.  If you don't want to help test a RELEASE CANDIDATE, then don't use it.  Nobody's twisting your arm.  Ubuntu is buggier than any modern version of Windows... why aren't you complaining about "testing" Ubuntu for free?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , puh-lease .
Anybody using the RC gets a free ride in that they get to test the OS and test their software with the OS for free .
If you do n't want to help test a RELEASE CANDIDATE , then do n't use it .
Nobody 's twisting your arm .
Ubuntu is buggier than any modern version of Windows... why are n't you complaining about " testing " Ubuntu for free ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, puh-lease.
Anybody using the RC gets a free ride in that they get to test the OS and test their software with the OS for free.
If you don't want to help test a RELEASE CANDIDATE, then don't use it.
Nobody's twisting your arm.
Ubuntu is buggier than any modern version of Windows... why aren't you complaining about "testing" Ubuntu for free?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990430</id>
	<title>Re:time...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265035440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>oh soooo bad...lol   nice link but hey, I already have Win7 thank you.</p><p>BTW, we all knew it was to stop working when we decided to try the public beta and RC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>oh soooo bad...lol nice link but hey , I already have Win7 thank you.BTW , we all knew it was to stop working when we decided to try the public beta and RC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>oh soooo bad...lol   nice link but hey, I already have Win7 thank you.BTW, we all knew it was to stop working when we decided to try the public beta and RC.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988576</id>
	<title>Re:..so?</title>
	<author>recoiledsnake</author>
	<datestamp>1265025420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, it's our M$ bashing article of the day, I've been waiting all day for a nice 'M$' bash post full of venom and vitriole, please don't rain on the parade! LOL M$ SUX!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , it 's our M $ bashing article of the day , I 've been waiting all day for a nice 'M $ ' bash post full of venom and vitriole , please do n't rain on the parade !
LOL M $ SUX !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, it's our M$ bashing article of the day, I've been waiting all day for a nice 'M$' bash post full of venom and vitriole, please don't rain on the parade!
LOL M$ SUX!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988470</id>
	<title>What's different?</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1265025000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whenever I use Windows, it always seems to shut itself down frequently when I'm in the middle of working on something. There's Blue Screens, automagic updates, and random freezes. So, what's different about this? It isn't going to change the uptime very much.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whenever I use Windows , it always seems to shut itself down frequently when I 'm in the middle of working on something .
There 's Blue Screens , automagic updates , and random freezes .
So , what 's different about this ?
It is n't going to change the uptime very much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whenever I use Windows, it always seems to shut itself down frequently when I'm in the middle of working on something.
There's Blue Screens, automagic updates, and random freezes.
So, what's different about this?
It isn't going to change the uptime very much.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989358</id>
	<title>Re:As a current user of it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265028600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've already patched my copy around the restrictions. I've got a legal copy so I figure I'm going to be lazy and not move on to the RTM until I redo my hardware again. Till then, I've already tested and this copy I'm running won't deactivate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've already patched my copy around the restrictions .
I 've got a legal copy so I figure I 'm going to be lazy and not move on to the RTM until I redo my hardware again .
Till then , I 've already tested and this copy I 'm running wo n't deactivate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've already patched my copy around the restrictions.
I've got a legal copy so I figure I'm going to be lazy and not move on to the RTM until I redo my hardware again.
Till then, I've already tested and this copy I'm running won't deactivate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990906</id>
	<title>Re:So what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265038800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Are there people stupid enough to think that a demo version of any software will run forever without nagging and shutting down"</p><p>Shit, son, I have demos of all sorts of software that still run to this very day, no nags, nothing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Are there people stupid enough to think that a demo version of any software will run forever without nagging and shutting down " Shit , son , I have demos of all sorts of software that still run to this very day , no nags , nothing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Are there people stupid enough to think that a demo version of any software will run forever without nagging and shutting down"Shit, son, I have demos of all sorts of software that still run to this very day, no nags, nothing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989764</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7 networking woes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265030880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have an Intel chipset on all of my machines at work and with Windows 7 we regularly transfer files between 700-900Mbps. This is back and forth between a combination of Windows 7, Windows Server 2003, and Windows Server 2008.</p><p>My question to you is, what chipset do you have which is actually exhibiting all of these issues? All you provide are some anecdotal reasons as to why Windows 7 sucks. And does your buddy provide any details of what machines are having these issues, aside from nVidia and Intel? Sounds like a blanket statement that can possibly be attributed to clueless customers or stupid IT people who won't take the time to troubleshoot.</p><p>I would naturally say "I don't know why this is modded insightful" - but that is a foolish statement because I am on Slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an Intel chipset on all of my machines at work and with Windows 7 we regularly transfer files between 700-900Mbps .
This is back and forth between a combination of Windows 7 , Windows Server 2003 , and Windows Server 2008.My question to you is , what chipset do you have which is actually exhibiting all of these issues ?
All you provide are some anecdotal reasons as to why Windows 7 sucks .
And does your buddy provide any details of what machines are having these issues , aside from nVidia and Intel ?
Sounds like a blanket statement that can possibly be attributed to clueless customers or stupid IT people who wo n't take the time to troubleshoot.I would naturally say " I do n't know why this is modded insightful " - but that is a foolish statement because I am on Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an Intel chipset on all of my machines at work and with Windows 7 we regularly transfer files between 700-900Mbps.
This is back and forth between a combination of Windows 7, Windows Server 2003, and Windows Server 2008.My question to you is, what chipset do you have which is actually exhibiting all of these issues?
All you provide are some anecdotal reasons as to why Windows 7 sucks.
And does your buddy provide any details of what machines are having these issues, aside from nVidia and Intel?
Sounds like a blanket statement that can possibly be attributed to clueless customers or stupid IT people who won't take the time to troubleshoot.I would naturally say "I don't know why this is modded insightful" - but that is a foolish statement because I am on Slashdot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990564</id>
	<title>Re:I'm glad there's no bias in the reporting on /.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265036340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't FRAKKIN' care if they are "increasing revenue"... and frankly... that's not news for nerds... tha's news for economists... as a nerd I feel... they have made the rollover cycle much shorter (xp lasted how many years?) and meanwhile they are charging exorbitant amounts for what amounts to a stupid upgrade, that should have been a download for vista users and as the other software used by said nerds is following the new ms upgrade cycle, I need to use the 'new' windows for interoperability.<br>(my other computer is a mac4lin decked out ubuntu... but I need to interact with people in the microsoft garden... so get off the high horse, come down here, and see why people are ACTUALLY having a problem with it all (in the middle of a really horible economy.)<br>But by all means, dismiss this as {insert derogatory statment here} fanboism...</p><p>(oh, ok, yeah, I know, now why don't you all tell the one about how we must be "mac fanbois" or some other throw away derogatory crap now.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't FRAKKIN ' care if they are " increasing revenue " ... and frankly... that 's not news for nerds... tha 's news for economists... as a nerd I feel... they have made the rollover cycle much shorter ( xp lasted how many years ?
) and meanwhile they are charging exorbitant amounts for what amounts to a stupid upgrade , that should have been a download for vista users and as the other software used by said nerds is following the new ms upgrade cycle , I need to use the 'new ' windows for interoperability .
( my other computer is a mac4lin decked out ubuntu... but I need to interact with people in the microsoft garden... so get off the high horse , come down here , and see why people are ACTUALLY having a problem with it all ( in the middle of a really horible economy .
) But by all means , dismiss this as { insert derogatory statment here } fanboism... ( oh , ok , yeah , I know , now why do n't you all tell the one about how we must be " mac fanbois " or some other throw away derogatory crap now .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't FRAKKIN' care if they are "increasing revenue"... and frankly... that's not news for nerds... tha's news for economists... as a nerd I feel... they have made the rollover cycle much shorter (xp lasted how many years?
) and meanwhile they are charging exorbitant amounts for what amounts to a stupid upgrade, that should have been a download for vista users and as the other software used by said nerds is following the new ms upgrade cycle, I need to use the 'new' windows for interoperability.
(my other computer is a mac4lin decked out ubuntu... but I need to interact with people in the microsoft garden... so get off the high horse, come down here, and see why people are ACTUALLY having a problem with it all (in the middle of a really horible economy.
)But by all means, dismiss this as {insert derogatory statment here} fanboism...(oh, ok, yeah, I know, now why don't you all tell the one about how we must be "mac fanbois" or some other throw away derogatory crap now.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988686</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989910</id>
	<title>Re:What service....</title>
	<author>psithurism</author>
	<datestamp>1265031600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>how do we disable it?</p></div><p>You can probably just set your clock back a few years. Maybe they've thought of that, but then again, maybe they haven't.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>how do we disable it ? You can probably just set your clock back a few years .
Maybe they 've thought of that , but then again , maybe they have n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how do we disable it?You can probably just set your clock back a few years.
Maybe they've thought of that, but then again, maybe they haven't.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988752</id>
	<title>This behaviour</title>
	<author>Progman3K</author>
	<datestamp>1265025960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Those shutdowns will come without warning.</p></div></blockquote><p>So, um, situation normal, then?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those shutdowns will come without warning.So , um , situation normal , then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those shutdowns will come without warning.So, um, situation normal, then?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991098</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>ajlisows</author>
	<datestamp>1265040420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Probably not typical, but a friend of mine is still running the RC.  Why?  Here was the situation.  His laptop was acting up last summer. Constantly shutting down.  I told him I would reload it for him.  It came with Vista.  I backed his stuff up, wiped his partition clean, and started installing Vista from scratch.  It simply wouldn't finish installing.  I tried several times with the same result (and no, I'm not so stupid that I don't know how to install Windows).  I thought it was probably a hard drive or RAM problem so I ran some tests on those.  No problems.  I don't remember who the manufacturer is but they did not have XP drivers on their site for that model.  For kicks I tried installing the Windows 7 RC.  Perfect.</p><p>So...I gave the laptop back to him and I told him when Windows 7 actually came out we would have to do something about it.  It hasn't been high priority until now, especially because he says the computer is working better now than it ever has.  Of course, he won't be too happy when if it starts shutting down.  Thanks for the reminder, Slashdot.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably not typical , but a friend of mine is still running the RC .
Why ? Here was the situation .
His laptop was acting up last summer .
Constantly shutting down .
I told him I would reload it for him .
It came with Vista .
I backed his stuff up , wiped his partition clean , and started installing Vista from scratch .
It simply would n't finish installing .
I tried several times with the same result ( and no , I 'm not so stupid that I do n't know how to install Windows ) .
I thought it was probably a hard drive or RAM problem so I ran some tests on those .
No problems .
I do n't remember who the manufacturer is but they did not have XP drivers on their site for that model .
For kicks I tried installing the Windows 7 RC .
Perfect.So...I gave the laptop back to him and I told him when Windows 7 actually came out we would have to do something about it .
It has n't been high priority until now , especially because he says the computer is working better now than it ever has .
Of course , he wo n't be too happy when if it starts shutting down .
Thanks for the reminder , Slashdot .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably not typical, but a friend of mine is still running the RC.
Why?  Here was the situation.
His laptop was acting up last summer.
Constantly shutting down.
I told him I would reload it for him.
It came with Vista.
I backed his stuff up, wiped his partition clean, and started installing Vista from scratch.
It simply wouldn't finish installing.
I tried several times with the same result (and no, I'm not so stupid that I don't know how to install Windows).
I thought it was probably a hard drive or RAM problem so I ran some tests on those.
No problems.
I don't remember who the manufacturer is but they did not have XP drivers on their site for that model.
For kicks I tried installing the Windows 7 RC.
Perfect.So...I gave the laptop back to him and I told him when Windows 7 actually came out we would have to do something about it.
It hasn't been high priority until now, especially because he says the computer is working better now than it ever has.
Of course, he won't be too happy when if it starts shutting down.
Thanks for the reminder, Slashdot.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988708</id>
	<title>Re:What service....</title>
	<author>Anne Thwacks</author>
	<datestamp>1265025840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>What service does this auto shutting down reside in and how do we disable it?</i> <p>
The service is Windows, and you disable it by installing Ubuntu.</p><p>
(You must be new here).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What service does this auto shutting down reside in and how do we disable it ?
The service is Windows , and you disable it by installing Ubuntu .
( You must be new here ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What service does this auto shutting down reside in and how do we disable it?
The service is Windows, and you disable it by installing Ubuntu.
(You must be new here).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991476</id>
	<title>Re:..so?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265044440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ubuntu is a commercial product too. Just because it is Open Source does not mean it is not commercial.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ubuntu is a commercial product too .
Just because it is Open Source does not mean it is not commercial .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ubuntu is a commercial product too.
Just because it is Open Source does not mean it is not commercial.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988776</id>
	<title>20 Questions, minus 16</title>
	<author>Bobfrankly1</author>
	<datestamp>1265026080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As of March 1, PCs running Windows 7 RC will automatically shut down every two hours. Those shutdowns will come without warning."</p></div><p>Isn't this a feature of the upcoming Windows 7 "ME Mode", the less desirable counterpart to "XP Mode"?<br>
<br>
Wait, so this is a penalty now, and not a feature?
<br> <br>
Why don't they call it nostalgia mode, for those that dream of the so called better days of yesteryears?
<br> <br>
It's the new power saving version of the BSOD! Instead of a blue\black screen, it just shuts down! Microsoft goes Green!<br> <br>
Thanks folks, I'll be here all week!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As of March 1 , PCs running Windows 7 RC will automatically shut down every two hours .
Those shutdowns will come without warning .
" Is n't this a feature of the upcoming Windows 7 " ME Mode " , the less desirable counterpart to " XP Mode " ?
Wait , so this is a penalty now , and not a feature ?
Why do n't they call it nostalgia mode , for those that dream of the so called better days of yesteryears ?
It 's the new power saving version of the BSOD !
Instead of a blue \ black screen , it just shuts down !
Microsoft goes Green !
Thanks folks , I 'll be here all week !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As of March 1, PCs running Windows 7 RC will automatically shut down every two hours.
Those shutdowns will come without warning.
"Isn't this a feature of the upcoming Windows 7 "ME Mode", the less desirable counterpart to "XP Mode"?
Wait, so this is a penalty now, and not a feature?
Why don't they call it nostalgia mode, for those that dream of the so called better days of yesteryears?
It's the new power saving version of the BSOD!
Instead of a blue\black screen, it just shuts down!
Microsoft goes Green!
Thanks folks, I'll be here all week!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988684</id>
	<title>Re:..so?</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1265025780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why does this commercial product work at all without payment?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does this commercial product work at all without payment ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does this commercial product work at all without payment?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989262</id>
	<title>Re:..so?</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1265028180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because it's a trial version. Contrary to other replies, this isn't particularly relevant to it being a non-final version, except that all non-final releases are legally trial versions. However, you can just as well get a <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/evalcenter/cc442495.aspx" title="microsoft.com">90-day trial version of Windows 7 Enterprise final version</a> [microsoft.com] for free (and if you just want to try it, that's what you really should use, rather than RC).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because it 's a trial version .
Contrary to other replies , this is n't particularly relevant to it being a non-final version , except that all non-final releases are legally trial versions .
However , you can just as well get a 90-day trial version of Windows 7 Enterprise final version [ microsoft.com ] for free ( and if you just want to try it , that 's what you really should use , rather than RC ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because it's a trial version.
Contrary to other replies, this isn't particularly relevant to it being a non-final version, except that all non-final releases are legally trial versions.
However, you can just as well get a 90-day trial version of Windows 7 Enterprise final version [microsoft.com] for free (and if you just want to try it, that's what you really should use, rather than RC).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989556</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7 networking woes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265029620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's totally your machine pal. I have no problems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's totally your machine pal .
I have no problems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's totally your machine pal.
I have no problems.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992704</id>
	<title>Re:It's a good thing.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265104440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Since the RC doesn't get any updates, less vulnerable boxes in the wild is always good for all of us. Why is this being spun as a bad thing?</p></div><p>I'm running the RC, and uh... it does get updates. Fairly often. Nice try, though.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since the RC does n't get any updates , less vulnerable boxes in the wild is always good for all of us .
Why is this being spun as a bad thing ? I 'm running the RC , and uh... it does get updates .
Fairly often .
Nice try , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since the RC doesn't get any updates, less vulnerable boxes in the wild is always good for all of us.
Why is this being spun as a bad thing?I'm running the RC, and uh... it does get updates.
Fairly often.
Nice try, though.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988590</id>
	<title>What service....</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1265025480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What service does this auto shutting down reside in and how do we disable it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What service does this auto shutting down reside in and how do we disable it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What service does this auto shutting down reside in and how do we disable it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990958</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1265039160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No surprise, no complaint. I just like feeling smug that I don't have to put up with any of this proprietary BS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No surprise , no complaint .
I just like feeling smug that I do n't have to put up with any of this proprietary BS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No surprise, no complaint.
I just like feeling smug that I don't have to put up with any of this proprietary BS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30998752</id>
	<title>Episode V</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265138160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The EMPIRE Strikes Back!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The EMPIRE Strikes Back !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The EMPIRE Strikes Back!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989666</id>
	<title>Normal...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265030280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Rebooting every few hours, then not booting at all? Many Windows users will just think this is normal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rebooting every few hours , then not booting at all ?
Many Windows users will just think this is normal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rebooting every few hours, then not booting at all?
Many Windows users will just think this is normal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989732</id>
	<title>Windows 7 Wiped My Drive Clean</title>
	<author>zeroRenegade</author>
	<datestamp>1265030700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After I installed windows 7 ultimate it completely wiped my drive which had windows 7 RC, and installed some bloody system files.</p><p>I foolishly was using the drive as storage at the time. One of the worst losses I've been hit with.</p><p>I had disconnected all other drives during the actual install of windows 7 ultimate (since windows is infamous for altering boot sectors), and I did not reconnect the other drives until many startups afterwards. Still it managed to completely wipe the drive without me even noticing until a day later.</p><p>It could have been much worse. Thank God windows does not understand the ext fs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After I installed windows 7 ultimate it completely wiped my drive which had windows 7 RC , and installed some bloody system files.I foolishly was using the drive as storage at the time .
One of the worst losses I 've been hit with.I had disconnected all other drives during the actual install of windows 7 ultimate ( since windows is infamous for altering boot sectors ) , and I did not reconnect the other drives until many startups afterwards .
Still it managed to completely wipe the drive without me even noticing until a day later.It could have been much worse .
Thank God windows does not understand the ext fs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After I installed windows 7 ultimate it completely wiped my drive which had windows 7 RC, and installed some bloody system files.I foolishly was using the drive as storage at the time.
One of the worst losses I've been hit with.I had disconnected all other drives during the actual install of windows 7 ultimate (since windows is infamous for altering boot sectors), and I did not reconnect the other drives until many startups afterwards.
Still it managed to completely wipe the drive without me even noticing until a day later.It could have been much worse.
Thank God windows does not understand the ext fs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991480</id>
	<title>Re:..so?</title>
	<author>ajlisows</author>
	<datestamp>1265044440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know enough about the software Climate outside the United States, but I really can't see how bootlegged copies of Windows are the #1 competition to Linux.  The majority of people buy a new computer.  It came with Windows XP, Windows Vista, or Windows 7.  They'll upgrade Windows when....they buy a new computer.  With Windows XP having been out since 2002 or whatever, most users have a copy of Windows XP.  Except for the case of people who have purchased computers from small mom and pop shops that "forgot" to include the sticker with the license key, I've done very little in the way of using bootlegged copies of Windows.  (Yes, Full Disclosure:  I've helped users get cracked copies of Windows when they have been screwed like this and needed to reinstall.  If that makes me a horrible software pirate that needs a visit from the BSA, so be it.)</p><p>Bootleg Microsoft Office or Adobe Photoshop?  I can see that being a barrier to Linux on the desktop.  Windows?  Not so much.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know enough about the software Climate outside the United States , but I really ca n't see how bootlegged copies of Windows are the # 1 competition to Linux .
The majority of people buy a new computer .
It came with Windows XP , Windows Vista , or Windows 7 .
They 'll upgrade Windows when....they buy a new computer .
With Windows XP having been out since 2002 or whatever , most users have a copy of Windows XP .
Except for the case of people who have purchased computers from small mom and pop shops that " forgot " to include the sticker with the license key , I 've done very little in the way of using bootlegged copies of Windows .
( Yes , Full Disclosure : I 've helped users get cracked copies of Windows when they have been screwed like this and needed to reinstall .
If that makes me a horrible software pirate that needs a visit from the BSA , so be it .
) Bootleg Microsoft Office or Adobe Photoshop ?
I can see that being a barrier to Linux on the desktop .
Windows ? Not so much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know enough about the software Climate outside the United States, but I really can't see how bootlegged copies of Windows are the #1 competition to Linux.
The majority of people buy a new computer.
It came with Windows XP, Windows Vista, or Windows 7.
They'll upgrade Windows when....they buy a new computer.
With Windows XP having been out since 2002 or whatever, most users have a copy of Windows XP.
Except for the case of people who have purchased computers from small mom and pop shops that "forgot" to include the sticker with the license key, I've done very little in the way of using bootlegged copies of Windows.
(Yes, Full Disclosure:  I've helped users get cracked copies of Windows when they have been screwed like this and needed to reinstall.
If that makes me a horrible software pirate that needs a visit from the BSA, so be it.
)Bootleg Microsoft Office or Adobe Photoshop?
I can see that being a barrier to Linux on the desktop.
Windows?  Not so much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992352</id>
	<title>RC</title>
	<author>^\_^x</author>
	<datestamp>1265142360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's an unofficial prerelease version of the OS - they already make it very clear you shouldn't use it for anything really important, and that it would expire at a fixed time. It's not news - not even on Slashdot. <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/04/30/1352249" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">in April,</a> [slashdot.org] and in more detail <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/04/30/1352249" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">in May</a> [slashdot.org] last year.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's an unofficial prerelease version of the OS - they already make it very clear you should n't use it for anything really important , and that it would expire at a fixed time .
It 's not news - not even on Slashdot .
in April , [ slashdot.org ] and in more detail in May [ slashdot.org ] last year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's an unofficial prerelease version of the OS - they already make it very clear you shouldn't use it for anything really important, and that it would expire at a fixed time.
It's not news - not even on Slashdot.
in April, [slashdot.org] and in more detail in May [slashdot.org] last year.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992800</id>
	<title>Re:I'm glad there's no bias in the reporting on /.</title>
	<author>RAMMS+EIN</author>
	<datestamp>1265106780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>``Saying that it's "nagging" the user to pay up, is nothing more than using some fine choice of words to make it look bad on Microsoft.''</p><p>Actually, I think that is the technical term for it. Software that does this is called <a href="http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-nagware.htm" title="wisegeek.com">nagware</a> [wisegeek.com].</p><p>``Next up: Adobe nags the users after one month of using their trial software. Oh, the horror!''</p><p>Actually, I do think it's pretty horrible. I guess you get used to it, but having switched to open source software a long time ago, I half jump out of my skin with fear, annoyance, and fury when I find myself on Windows, especially in the "as shipped" or the "my computer is slow" states. It's like every second program on the computer is trying to get your attention for something or other: your computer may be at risk, your virus definitions are out of date, your trial period has expired, a new Java update is available, checking for new versions of your Firefox plugins, please click "Allow" if you want to allow Windows to start the program you just told it to start, and on and on. And don't get me started on the processes of software installation, hardware installation, or updates.</p><p>Being used to Debian, the Windows desktop is horribly distracting. I can completely understand why users give up reading the messages that pop up on their screens and just want them to go away as quickly as possible.</p><p>Sorry for the rant. I feel better now that's off my chest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>` ` Saying that it 's " nagging " the user to pay up , is nothing more than using some fine choice of words to make it look bad on Microsoft .
''Actually , I think that is the technical term for it .
Software that does this is called nagware [ wisegeek.com ] . ` ` Next up : Adobe nags the users after one month of using their trial software .
Oh , the horror !
''Actually , I do think it 's pretty horrible .
I guess you get used to it , but having switched to open source software a long time ago , I half jump out of my skin with fear , annoyance , and fury when I find myself on Windows , especially in the " as shipped " or the " my computer is slow " states .
It 's like every second program on the computer is trying to get your attention for something or other : your computer may be at risk , your virus definitions are out of date , your trial period has expired , a new Java update is available , checking for new versions of your Firefox plugins , please click " Allow " if you want to allow Windows to start the program you just told it to start , and on and on .
And do n't get me started on the processes of software installation , hardware installation , or updates.Being used to Debian , the Windows desktop is horribly distracting .
I can completely understand why users give up reading the messages that pop up on their screens and just want them to go away as quickly as possible.Sorry for the rant .
I feel better now that 's off my chest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>``Saying that it's "nagging" the user to pay up, is nothing more than using some fine choice of words to make it look bad on Microsoft.
''Actually, I think that is the technical term for it.
Software that does this is called nagware [wisegeek.com].``Next up: Adobe nags the users after one month of using their trial software.
Oh, the horror!
''Actually, I do think it's pretty horrible.
I guess you get used to it, but having switched to open source software a long time ago, I half jump out of my skin with fear, annoyance, and fury when I find myself on Windows, especially in the "as shipped" or the "my computer is slow" states.
It's like every second program on the computer is trying to get your attention for something or other: your computer may be at risk, your virus definitions are out of date, your trial period has expired, a new Java update is available, checking for new versions of your Firefox plugins, please click "Allow" if you want to allow Windows to start the program you just told it to start, and on and on.
And don't get me started on the processes of software installation, hardware installation, or updates.Being used to Debian, the Windows desktop is horribly distracting.
I can completely understand why users give up reading the messages that pop up on their screens and just want them to go away as quickly as possible.Sorry for the rant.
I feel better now that's off my chest.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988540</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991900</id>
	<title>Re:What's different?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265049300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I still repeatedly get BSODs in Windows 7. Granted, I think it's something to do with the graphics driver. Or maybe it's the CPU. It's a new computer, there's all sorts of weird stuff that I'm not sure works.  Why do computers need to be complicated?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I still repeatedly get BSODs in Windows 7 .
Granted , I think it 's something to do with the graphics driver .
Or maybe it 's the CPU .
It 's a new computer , there 's all sorts of weird stuff that I 'm not sure works .
Why do computers need to be complicated ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still repeatedly get BSODs in Windows 7.
Granted, I think it's something to do with the graphics driver.
Or maybe it's the CPU.
It's a new computer, there's all sorts of weird stuff that I'm not sure works.
Why do computers need to be complicated?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989496</id>
	<title>Re:Microsoft getting free ride</title>
	<author>Yosho</author>
	<datestamp>1265029320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This was not a beta version but probably a shakedown version.</p> </div><p>Well... duh?  The "RC" in the name is for "Release Candidate".  The entire point of the release is so that the geeks could check it out before the final release so that they could get impressions of it, tell their friends and family about it, and catch any final, show-stopping bugs.  Microsoft never said it was a "free trial" version.  Anybody who <i>ever</i> used the RC version for an important system is a moron.  You seem to have just discovered something that Microsoft was very up-front and honest about.</p><p>Also, the Windows 7 beta versions already expired long ago.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This was not a beta version but probably a shakedown version .
Well... duh ?
The " RC " in the name is for " Release Candidate " .
The entire point of the release is so that the geeks could check it out before the final release so that they could get impressions of it , tell their friends and family about it , and catch any final , show-stopping bugs .
Microsoft never said it was a " free trial " version .
Anybody who ever used the RC version for an important system is a moron .
You seem to have just discovered something that Microsoft was very up-front and honest about.Also , the Windows 7 beta versions already expired long ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was not a beta version but probably a shakedown version.
Well... duh?
The "RC" in the name is for "Release Candidate".
The entire point of the release is so that the geeks could check it out before the final release so that they could get impressions of it, tell their friends and family about it, and catch any final, show-stopping bugs.
Microsoft never said it was a "free trial" version.
Anybody who ever used the RC version for an important system is a moron.
You seem to have just discovered something that Microsoft was very up-front and honest about.Also, the Windows 7 beta versions already expired long ago.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988632</id>
	<title>Re:..so?</title>
	<author>jmorris42</author>
	<datestamp>1265025600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Windows is a commercial product.</p><p>Exactly right.  Bootleg Windows is the #1 competition to Linux.  So if ya want to bring about "The Year of the Linux Desktop" helping Microsoft turn the screws on unlicensed installs is probably the most productive thing a non-coder can do.  Especially outside the US.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Windows is a commercial product.Exactly right .
Bootleg Windows is the # 1 competition to Linux .
So if ya want to bring about " The Year of the Linux Desktop " helping Microsoft turn the screws on unlicensed installs is probably the most productive thing a non-coder can do .
Especially outside the US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Windows is a commercial product.Exactly right.
Bootleg Windows is the #1 competition to Linux.
So if ya want to bring about "The Year of the Linux Desktop" helping Microsoft turn the screws on unlicensed installs is probably the most productive thing a non-coder can do.
Especially outside the US.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988666</id>
	<title>Windows 7 networking woes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265025660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Count me as one of the people seeing the nag screens...  Installed Ultimate edition 32-bit, have a license of Professional 64-bit.  So at some point I am going to have reload the OS.  Just not sure it if will be Win 7 Pro-64 or back to XP.  <br> <br>
Biggest problem with Windows 7 has been the network performance.  On a gigabyte network I can not get better than 100mbs performance, while the Linux and XP machines perform as expected.  To make matters worse, the network appears to spike and disconnect itself at random times.  Streaming a video from the Windows 7 machine and surfing the web will produce stutters.  Talked with a buddy that is a a major account TAM--apparently the networking issue has been well known since the RC and affects nVidia and Intel chipsets.  My question to him--so what chipsets does that leave unaffected?<br>
<br>
I really tried to like Windows 7 but the more I try to like the more I find thinking Ubuntu is the way to go...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Count me as one of the people seeing the nag screens... Installed Ultimate edition 32-bit , have a license of Professional 64-bit .
So at some point I am going to have reload the OS .
Just not sure it if will be Win 7 Pro-64 or back to XP .
Biggest problem with Windows 7 has been the network performance .
On a gigabyte network I can not get better than 100mbs performance , while the Linux and XP machines perform as expected .
To make matters worse , the network appears to spike and disconnect itself at random times .
Streaming a video from the Windows 7 machine and surfing the web will produce stutters .
Talked with a buddy that is a a major account TAM--apparently the networking issue has been well known since the RC and affects nVidia and Intel chipsets .
My question to him--so what chipsets does that leave unaffected ?
I really tried to like Windows 7 but the more I try to like the more I find thinking Ubuntu is the way to go.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Count me as one of the people seeing the nag screens...  Installed Ultimate edition 32-bit, have a license of Professional 64-bit.
So at some point I am going to have reload the OS.
Just not sure it if will be Win 7 Pro-64 or back to XP.
Biggest problem with Windows 7 has been the network performance.
On a gigabyte network I can not get better than 100mbs performance, while the Linux and XP machines perform as expected.
To make matters worse, the network appears to spike and disconnect itself at random times.
Streaming a video from the Windows 7 machine and surfing the web will produce stutters.
Talked with a buddy that is a a major account TAM--apparently the networking issue has been well known since the RC and affects nVidia and Intel chipsets.
My question to him--so what chipsets does that leave unaffected?
I really tried to like Windows 7 but the more I try to like the more I find thinking Ubuntu is the way to go...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989996</id>
	<title>not quite a shutdown</title>
	<author>glebovitz</author>
	<datestamp>1265032200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I received notice from Microsoft that Windows 7 RC would get a "Blue Screen" every few hours. The notice didn't say anything about Windows shutting down gracefully. At first I though it was a joke, but then I followed the link to the Microsoft web site and it turned out to be serious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I received notice from Microsoft that Windows 7 RC would get a " Blue Screen " every few hours .
The notice did n't say anything about Windows shutting down gracefully .
At first I though it was a joke , but then I followed the link to the Microsoft web site and it turned out to be serious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I received notice from Microsoft that Windows 7 RC would get a "Blue Screen" every few hours.
The notice didn't say anything about Windows shutting down gracefully.
At first I though it was a joke, but then I followed the link to the Microsoft web site and it turned out to be serious.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988734</id>
	<title>Re:I'm glad there's no bias in the reporting on /.</title>
	<author>CannonballHead</author>
	<datestamp>1265025900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The users didn't just "know," they were <i>told</i>.  Big difference.  MS made no secret about it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The users did n't just " know , " they were told .
Big difference .
MS made no secret about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The users didn't just "know," they were told.
Big difference.
MS made no secret about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988540</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990042</id>
	<title>Re:What's different?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265032440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>In all honesty, when was the last time you saw a BSOD? </i></p><p>Earlier today. There still are a lot of flakey drivers out there, especially AHCI on XP.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In all honesty , when was the last time you saw a BSOD ?
Earlier today .
There still are a lot of flakey drivers out there , especially AHCI on XP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In all honesty, when was the last time you saw a BSOD?
Earlier today.
There still are a lot of flakey drivers out there, especially AHCI on XP.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30993094</id>
	<title>Re:Oh wow!</title>
	<author>benjymouse</author>
	<datestamp>1265111280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know that I probably shouldn't feed the troll, but anyway

</p><ol>
<li>Windows does not "break consistently". (what is that anyway?). I assume you meant "constantly". But that would also be false. Windows has grown rock solid, and since XP and with Vista/7 you will only ever experience BSODs when a driver or hardware malfunctions badly.</li>
<li>MS has grown wary of bundling applications. Those 92\% market share means that any bundled app is a potential anti-trust suit. MS' new policy is to make apps available for downloading, such as movie maker etc. If you are referring to apt-get, then you're right, MS doesn't have anything like that.</li>
<li>Single desktop. I'm not sure why you believe fragmentation would be desirable. Anyways, Windows allows the desktop "shell" to be replaced - as it often is in kiosk apps etc (when they are not running Linux).</li>
<li>When was the last time you updated Ubuntu? In my experience that OS needs a lot more patching than Windows. All OSes need patching. Live with it.</li>
<li>No, the graphics are not as pretty as - say - OS X. And certainly not as overloaded (or stunning) as compiz. But the effects *are* carefully thought through and tends to not distract from the main purpose. Live preview is really useful. As are jumplists. The matte glass effect is just bling, rarely useful.</li>
</ol></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know that I probably should n't feed the troll , but anyway Windows does not " break consistently " .
( what is that anyway ? ) .
I assume you meant " constantly " .
But that would also be false .
Windows has grown rock solid , and since XP and with Vista/7 you will only ever experience BSODs when a driver or hardware malfunctions badly .
MS has grown wary of bundling applications .
Those 92 \ % market share means that any bundled app is a potential anti-trust suit .
MS ' new policy is to make apps available for downloading , such as movie maker etc .
If you are referring to apt-get , then you 're right , MS does n't have anything like that .
Single desktop .
I 'm not sure why you believe fragmentation would be desirable .
Anyways , Windows allows the desktop " shell " to be replaced - as it often is in kiosk apps etc ( when they are not running Linux ) .
When was the last time you updated Ubuntu ?
In my experience that OS needs a lot more patching than Windows .
All OSes need patching .
Live with it .
No , the graphics are not as pretty as - say - OS X. And certainly not as overloaded ( or stunning ) as compiz .
But the effects * are * carefully thought through and tends to not distract from the main purpose .
Live preview is really useful .
As are jumplists .
The matte glass effect is just bling , rarely useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know that I probably shouldn't feed the troll, but anyway


Windows does not "break consistently".
(what is that anyway?).
I assume you meant "constantly".
But that would also be false.
Windows has grown rock solid, and since XP and with Vista/7 you will only ever experience BSODs when a driver or hardware malfunctions badly.
MS has grown wary of bundling applications.
Those 92\% market share means that any bundled app is a potential anti-trust suit.
MS' new policy is to make apps available for downloading, such as movie maker etc.
If you are referring to apt-get, then you're right, MS doesn't have anything like that.
Single desktop.
I'm not sure why you believe fragmentation would be desirable.
Anyways, Windows allows the desktop "shell" to be replaced - as it often is in kiosk apps etc (when they are not running Linux).
When was the last time you updated Ubuntu?
In my experience that OS needs a lot more patching than Windows.
All OSes need patching.
Live with it.
No, the graphics are not as pretty as - say - OS X. And certainly not as overloaded (or stunning) as compiz.
But the effects *are* carefully thought through and tends to not distract from the main purpose.
Live preview is really useful.
As are jumplists.
The matte glass effect is just bling, rarely useful.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30993682</id>
	<title>A Windows machine that shuts down without warning?</title>
	<author>iapetus</author>
	<datestamp>1265116920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, that's new and surprising.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p><p>I'd be a lot happier if Microsoft had seen fit to let all versions of Windows 7 be used as an upgrade to the preview. The fact that I'll have to reinstall from scratch is the only reason I've not installed my legally purchased copy yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , that 's new and surprising .
: DI 'd be a lot happier if Microsoft had seen fit to let all versions of Windows 7 be used as an upgrade to the preview .
The fact that I 'll have to reinstall from scratch is the only reason I 've not installed my legally purchased copy yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, that's new and surprising.
:DI'd be a lot happier if Microsoft had seen fit to let all versions of Windows 7 be used as an upgrade to the preview.
The fact that I'll have to reinstall from scratch is the only reason I've not installed my legally purchased copy yet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30993878</id>
	<title>Wrong end of the stick</title>
	<author>imakemusic</author>
	<datestamp>1265118660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This isn't a post decrying Microsoft. Surely it's just a post to remind all those people using the RC to download a cracked copy of the final?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't a post decrying Microsoft .
Surely it 's just a post to remind all those people using the RC to download a cracked copy of the final ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't a post decrying Microsoft.
Surely it's just a post to remind all those people using the RC to download a cracked copy of the final?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989268</id>
	<title>Re:Oh wow!</title>
	<author>TheRealGrogan</author>
	<datestamp>1265028180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The main selling point for me is that it runs my games. That's pretty much the only reason I bother with Windows, to feed my gaming addiction. (I use Linux for everything else)</p><p>That said, I think that Windows 7 is a pretty nice system. Fast, stable and attractive, though I would feel crippled if I actually had to use it for getting work done. (I've got open stuff laid out across 8 virtual desktops in XFCE at the moment and I can move between them simply by going to the screen edges with my mouse, or click on my pager. I would hit the brick wall of confusion in Windows... if I actually had useful software)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The main selling point for me is that it runs my games .
That 's pretty much the only reason I bother with Windows , to feed my gaming addiction .
( I use Linux for everything else ) That said , I think that Windows 7 is a pretty nice system .
Fast , stable and attractive , though I would feel crippled if I actually had to use it for getting work done .
( I 've got open stuff laid out across 8 virtual desktops in XFCE at the moment and I can move between them simply by going to the screen edges with my mouse , or click on my pager .
I would hit the brick wall of confusion in Windows... if I actually had useful software )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The main selling point for me is that it runs my games.
That's pretty much the only reason I bother with Windows, to feed my gaming addiction.
(I use Linux for everything else)That said, I think that Windows 7 is a pretty nice system.
Fast, stable and attractive, though I would feel crippled if I actually had to use it for getting work done.
(I've got open stuff laid out across 8 virtual desktops in XFCE at the moment and I can move between them simply by going to the screen edges with my mouse, or click on my pager.
I would hit the brick wall of confusion in Windows... if I actually had useful software)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989330</id>
	<title>Re:obligatory ....</title>
	<author>supernova\_hq</author>
	<datestamp>1265028420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's not a bug, it's a feature!</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not a bug , it 's a feature !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not a bug, it's a feature!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989086</id>
	<title>Re:I'm glad there's no bias in the reporting on /.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265027340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>All the users knew beforehand that the free trial would end one day</i></p><p>The email MS sent us with the licence key for it made it perfectly clear what would happen, including dates, warnings, and 2-hourly shutdowns. No-one with a legitimate install of the RC should be surprised by this at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All the users knew beforehand that the free trial would end one dayThe email MS sent us with the licence key for it made it perfectly clear what would happen , including dates , warnings , and 2-hourly shutdowns .
No-one with a legitimate install of the RC should be surprised by this at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the users knew beforehand that the free trial would end one dayThe email MS sent us with the licence key for it made it perfectly clear what would happen, including dates, warnings, and 2-hourly shutdowns.
No-one with a legitimate install of the RC should be surprised by this at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988540</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989856</id>
	<title>Re:What service....</title>
	<author>Brett Buck</author>
	<datestamp>1265031360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, he walked right into that one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , he walked right into that one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, he walked right into that one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988708</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989626</id>
	<title>Re:What's different?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265030040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I have been running XP at work with 100\% uptime for years...</p></div><p>How many years?  That's incredible!  Not a single system crash, reboot, or power failure even in all that time?  Or do you mean something different than "100\% uptime"?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have been running XP at work with 100 \ % uptime for years...How many years ?
That 's incredible !
Not a single system crash , reboot , or power failure even in all that time ?
Or do you mean something different than " 100 \ % uptime " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have been running XP at work with 100\% uptime for years...How many years?
That's incredible!
Not a single system crash, reboot, or power failure even in all that time?
Or do you mean something different than "100\% uptime"?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989866</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265031420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; You didn't pay for it, and it's Microsoft. What do you expect?</p><p>It's Microsoft. What do you expect?</p><p>There, FTFY.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; You did n't pay for it , and it 's Microsoft .
What do you expect ? It 's Microsoft .
What do you expect ? There , FTFY .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; You didn't pay for it, and it's Microsoft.
What do you expect?It's Microsoft.
What do you expect?There, FTFY.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991576</id>
	<title>Re:Ask Slashdot:</title>
	<author>caitsith01</author>
	<datestamp>1265045460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>7 is still a giant kludge. It's like Microsoft <i>wants</i> people to switch. Seems to be working.. Lots more Macs in my neighborhood.</p></div><p>Actually, 7 works really well and is without much doubt the best OS Microsoft has so far released.  And I am someone who went through the pain of manually downgrading a new laptop from Vista to XP, so great was my hatred for Vista and love for XP.  I mostly use my PC for gaming and I won't be going back to XP.</p><p>There are maaaaaaaaaany ways in which 7 beats XP.  For example:</p><p>- actually recognises hardware made in the last 10 years out of the box</p><p>- driver-related crashes, if any, typically drop you back to the desktop with no further damage</p><p>- actually quite good at finding the right drivers on-line</p><p>- significantly better HDD performance in my case, which I attribute to the OS actually expecting and knowing how to use modern SATA drives</p><p>- and of course a UI that looks half decent and is much more intuitive and flexible</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>7 is still a giant kludge .
It 's like Microsoft wants people to switch .
Seems to be working.. Lots more Macs in my neighborhood.Actually , 7 works really well and is without much doubt the best OS Microsoft has so far released .
And I am someone who went through the pain of manually downgrading a new laptop from Vista to XP , so great was my hatred for Vista and love for XP .
I mostly use my PC for gaming and I wo n't be going back to XP.There are maaaaaaaaaany ways in which 7 beats XP .
For example : - actually recognises hardware made in the last 10 years out of the box- driver-related crashes , if any , typically drop you back to the desktop with no further damage- actually quite good at finding the right drivers on-line- significantly better HDD performance in my case , which I attribute to the OS actually expecting and knowing how to use modern SATA drives- and of course a UI that looks half decent and is much more intuitive and flexible</tokentext>
<sentencetext>7 is still a giant kludge.
It's like Microsoft wants people to switch.
Seems to be working.. Lots more Macs in my neighborhood.Actually, 7 works really well and is without much doubt the best OS Microsoft has so far released.
And I am someone who went through the pain of manually downgrading a new laptop from Vista to XP, so great was my hatred for Vista and love for XP.
I mostly use my PC for gaming and I won't be going back to XP.There are maaaaaaaaaany ways in which 7 beats XP.
For example:- actually recognises hardware made in the last 10 years out of the box- driver-related crashes, if any, typically drop you back to the desktop with no further damage- actually quite good at finding the right drivers on-line- significantly better HDD performance in my case, which I attribute to the OS actually expecting and knowing how to use modern SATA drives- and of course a UI that looks half decent and is much more intuitive and flexible
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991024</id>
	<title>Re:What's different?</title>
	<author>dbIII</author>
	<datestamp>1265039760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I have been running XP at work with 100\% uptime for years</p></div></blockquote><p>That doesn't mean what you think it does.<br>It's used in the context of systems with redundant hardware that can be replaced while the power is still on and code still running and not a desktop PC that gets turned off every night or rebooted about once every two weeks after an update.  Using what looks to you as cool tech language doesn't help you fit in, it's the equivalent of calling the beige box on the floor a "hard drive".<br>In XP the behaviour was changed from a blue screen to an exit back to the login screen anyway.  I've seen a lot of those or just complete hangs.   There is such a vast amount of utter crap that runs on XP that when it crashes it's most likely a third party app doing it - but it is still something common in that environment no matter what causes it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have been running XP at work with 100 \ % uptime for yearsThat does n't mean what you think it does.It 's used in the context of systems with redundant hardware that can be replaced while the power is still on and code still running and not a desktop PC that gets turned off every night or rebooted about once every two weeks after an update .
Using what looks to you as cool tech language does n't help you fit in , it 's the equivalent of calling the beige box on the floor a " hard drive " .In XP the behaviour was changed from a blue screen to an exit back to the login screen anyway .
I 've seen a lot of those or just complete hangs .
There is such a vast amount of utter crap that runs on XP that when it crashes it 's most likely a third party app doing it - but it is still something common in that environment no matter what causes it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have been running XP at work with 100\% uptime for yearsThat doesn't mean what you think it does.It's used in the context of systems with redundant hardware that can be replaced while the power is still on and code still running and not a desktop PC that gets turned off every night or rebooted about once every two weeks after an update.
Using what looks to you as cool tech language doesn't help you fit in, it's the equivalent of calling the beige box on the floor a "hard drive".In XP the behaviour was changed from a blue screen to an exit back to the login screen anyway.
I've seen a lot of those or just complete hangs.
There is such a vast amount of utter crap that runs on XP that when it crashes it's most likely a third party app doing it - but it is still something common in that environment no matter what causes it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989862</id>
	<title>Re:..so?</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1265031360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This isn't even bootleg Windows. This was the free Windows 7 preview that Microsoft released last year. You know, the one they said from day one would be disabled in March? In extremely obvious huge text on the website you downloaded it from? That Windows.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't even bootleg Windows .
This was the free Windows 7 preview that Microsoft released last year .
You know , the one they said from day one would be disabled in March ?
In extremely obvious huge text on the website you downloaded it from ?
That Windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't even bootleg Windows.
This was the free Windows 7 preview that Microsoft released last year.
You know, the one they said from day one would be disabled in March?
In extremely obvious huge text on the website you downloaded it from?
That Windows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.31017468</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>secolactico</author>
	<datestamp>1264945860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>and XP is nowhere near as good as they claimed to be.</p></div></blockquote><p>Actually, XP is one of the better products released by MS.  It was the first MS product I bought and never regretted it.  As my hardware was upgraded (new motherbard, new memory, more hdd, etc) I simply reinstalled and never had any issue with activation.</p><p>Now I've moved on to Windows 7 and I see nothing in it that makes it worse than XP and several features that makes it better (its firewall, for example, is miles ahead of the one that came with XP SP2).</p><p>Now, why would you bother upgrading if you are happy with XP?  No reason, really.  Eventually, tho, it will reach its EOL and MS will stop providing patches and bugfixes.</p><blockquote><div><p>Besides M$ was really hot on the idea of tying the software licences to hardware, so when hardware died you had to pay for those software licences all over again.</p></div> </blockquote><p>Well, I wouldn't put that past MS (or any other corp for that matter), after all, they've been toying with the whole "software as a service" for a bit now, but I've still haven't seen them rent Word on a monthly basis.  Can you provide a link to the "hardware license" thing?</p><p>So, to make my point short, you don't have to go with Windows 7 or Microsoft at all.  But if you want to purchase an OS, I see no advantage to buying XP instead of 7.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and XP is nowhere near as good as they claimed to be.Actually , XP is one of the better products released by MS. It was the first MS product I bought and never regretted it .
As my hardware was upgraded ( new motherbard , new memory , more hdd , etc ) I simply reinstalled and never had any issue with activation.Now I 've moved on to Windows 7 and I see nothing in it that makes it worse than XP and several features that makes it better ( its firewall , for example , is miles ahead of the one that came with XP SP2 ) .Now , why would you bother upgrading if you are happy with XP ?
No reason , really .
Eventually , tho , it will reach its EOL and MS will stop providing patches and bugfixes.Besides M $ was really hot on the idea of tying the software licences to hardware , so when hardware died you had to pay for those software licences all over again .
Well , I would n't put that past MS ( or any other corp for that matter ) , after all , they 've been toying with the whole " software as a service " for a bit now , but I 've still have n't seen them rent Word on a monthly basis .
Can you provide a link to the " hardware license " thing ? So , to make my point short , you do n't have to go with Windows 7 or Microsoft at all .
But if you want to purchase an OS , I see no advantage to buying XP instead of 7 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and XP is nowhere near as good as they claimed to be.Actually, XP is one of the better products released by MS.  It was the first MS product I bought and never regretted it.
As my hardware was upgraded (new motherbard, new memory, more hdd, etc) I simply reinstalled and never had any issue with activation.Now I've moved on to Windows 7 and I see nothing in it that makes it worse than XP and several features that makes it better (its firewall, for example, is miles ahead of the one that came with XP SP2).Now, why would you bother upgrading if you are happy with XP?
No reason, really.
Eventually, tho, it will reach its EOL and MS will stop providing patches and bugfixes.Besides M$ was really hot on the idea of tying the software licences to hardware, so when hardware died you had to pay for those software licences all over again.
Well, I wouldn't put that past MS (or any other corp for that matter), after all, they've been toying with the whole "software as a service" for a bit now, but I've still haven't seen them rent Word on a monthly basis.
Can you provide a link to the "hardware license" thing?So, to make my point short, you don't have to go with Windows 7 or Microsoft at all.
But if you want to purchase an OS, I see no advantage to buying XP instead of 7.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992436</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992026</id>
	<title>Re:Ahhh... the microsoft motto</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1265051100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No,the Microsoft motto is,<br> <br>

Be greedy.<br> <br>

Evil just happens to be a side effect of this. If saving kittens was highly profitable, Microsoft would at the forefront of feline recovery services.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No,the Microsoft motto is , Be greedy .
Evil just happens to be a side effect of this .
If saving kittens was highly profitable , Microsoft would at the forefront of feline recovery services .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No,the Microsoft motto is, 

Be greedy.
Evil just happens to be a side effect of this.
If saving kittens was highly profitable, Microsoft would at the forefront of feline recovery services.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989202</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>supernova\_hq</author>
	<datestamp>1265027880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did anyone ever get that version to run more than a week without going up in flames?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did anyone ever get that version to run more than a week without going up in flames ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did anyone ever get that version to run more than a week without going up in flames?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988842</id>
	<title>Re:Open Source/Linux's Failure To Capitalize</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265026320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe I'm a bit less discerning than you, but somewhere back, about 10 years ago, I made the switch to Linux for my desktop. I kept a Windows (legal!) boot partition around, or ran it under VMWare, for the several programs I couldn't find a replacement for.  Gradually, the number shrank, although it sat at "3" for several years.  4 years ago, though, I didn't have to do that anymore. I have a legal copy of WinXP (my office never really made the switch to Vista) in case I just have to load up a VM (site license with no VM restrictions), and it's kept in a sfe spot, so I can find it. But, really, I've not had to do that for, yes, 4 years and two laptop rebuilds, because I've found that:<br>1. Gnome and KDE are just competing window environments. I can live and work with either.<br>2. The hardest decision is csh/tcsh or bash.<br>3. OpenOffice is interoperable enough for all I do. You know, scientific papers, presentations, writing documents ot PDF, spreadsheets with fewer numerical limitations that Excel.<br>4. I'm not as hobbled in Linux as in the Windows world, where they can't get '/' right, and they try putting network-related files in really strange places.<br>5. The bearded guy keeps corporations from removing Open Source software from my desktop, especially if they've merely raided it instead of writing it themselves!</p><p>Sorry, a "Score:1, Insightful" heading is in error.  More like, "-5, troll".</p><p>If you don't like it, then don't use it. But please don't tell me what I should use because you can't find the shrink-wrap license.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I 'm a bit less discerning than you , but somewhere back , about 10 years ago , I made the switch to Linux for my desktop .
I kept a Windows ( legal !
) boot partition around , or ran it under VMWare , for the several programs I could n't find a replacement for .
Gradually , the number shrank , although it sat at " 3 " for several years .
4 years ago , though , I did n't have to do that anymore .
I have a legal copy of WinXP ( my office never really made the switch to Vista ) in case I just have to load up a VM ( site license with no VM restrictions ) , and it 's kept in a sfe spot , so I can find it .
But , really , I 've not had to do that for , yes , 4 years and two laptop rebuilds , because I 've found that : 1 .
Gnome and KDE are just competing window environments .
I can live and work with either.2 .
The hardest decision is csh/tcsh or bash.3 .
OpenOffice is interoperable enough for all I do .
You know , scientific papers , presentations , writing documents ot PDF , spreadsheets with fewer numerical limitations that Excel.4 .
I 'm not as hobbled in Linux as in the Windows world , where they ca n't get '/ ' right , and they try putting network-related files in really strange places.5 .
The bearded guy keeps corporations from removing Open Source software from my desktop , especially if they 've merely raided it instead of writing it themselves ! Sorry , a " Score : 1 , Insightful " heading is in error .
More like , " -5 , troll " .If you do n't like it , then do n't use it .
But please do n't tell me what I should use because you ca n't find the shrink-wrap license .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I'm a bit less discerning than you, but somewhere back, about 10 years ago, I made the switch to Linux for my desktop.
I kept a Windows (legal!
) boot partition around, or ran it under VMWare, for the several programs I couldn't find a replacement for.
Gradually, the number shrank, although it sat at "3" for several years.
4 years ago, though, I didn't have to do that anymore.
I have a legal copy of WinXP (my office never really made the switch to Vista) in case I just have to load up a VM (site license with no VM restrictions), and it's kept in a sfe spot, so I can find it.
But, really, I've not had to do that for, yes, 4 years and two laptop rebuilds, because I've found that:1.
Gnome and KDE are just competing window environments.
I can live and work with either.2.
The hardest decision is csh/tcsh or bash.3.
OpenOffice is interoperable enough for all I do.
You know, scientific papers, presentations, writing documents ot PDF, spreadsheets with fewer numerical limitations that Excel.4.
I'm not as hobbled in Linux as in the Windows world, where they can't get '/' right, and they try putting network-related files in really strange places.5.
The bearded guy keeps corporations from removing Open Source software from my desktop, especially if they've merely raided it instead of writing it themselves!Sorry, a "Score:1, Insightful" heading is in error.
More like, "-5, troll".If you don't like it, then don't use it.
But please don't tell me what I should use because you can't find the shrink-wrap license.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989182</id>
	<title>Microsoft getting free ride</title>
	<author>StillNeedMoreCoffee</author>
	<datestamp>1265027820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really, the free trial version of course is a way of getting a large test populatition to shake down the product, to get the product out and get acceptance in the community, to get the geeks familiar with it ahead of time so when the others in their company, friends and family get hit with the new version they will have a up and ready support community.  All this microsoft gets for free. This was not a beta version but probably a shakedown version. So the treatment of the user, especiall un-scheduled shutdowns that could ruin a database, or a file or a directory or someones life work seems like a little on the unfeeling corporate 'we can do anything to you we want', spoiled child, I'm going to take my ball and go home, side. Go Microsoft with this new public relations campaign. Luckily I already have Ubantu dual booted (but then my copy is a paid copy of Windows 7).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really , the free trial version of course is a way of getting a large test populatition to shake down the product , to get the product out and get acceptance in the community , to get the geeks familiar with it ahead of time so when the others in their company , friends and family get hit with the new version they will have a up and ready support community .
All this microsoft gets for free .
This was not a beta version but probably a shakedown version .
So the treatment of the user , especiall un-scheduled shutdowns that could ruin a database , or a file or a directory or someones life work seems like a little on the unfeeling corporate 'we can do anything to you we want ' , spoiled child , I 'm going to take my ball and go home , side .
Go Microsoft with this new public relations campaign .
Luckily I already have Ubantu dual booted ( but then my copy is a paid copy of Windows 7 ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really, the free trial version of course is a way of getting a large test populatition to shake down the product, to get the product out and get acceptance in the community, to get the geeks familiar with it ahead of time so when the others in their company, friends and family get hit with the new version they will have a up and ready support community.
All this microsoft gets for free.
This was not a beta version but probably a shakedown version.
So the treatment of the user, especiall un-scheduled shutdowns that could ruin a database, or a file or a directory or someones life work seems like a little on the unfeeling corporate 'we can do anything to you we want', spoiled child, I'm going to take my ball and go home, side.
Go Microsoft with this new public relations campaign.
Luckily I already have Ubantu dual booted (but then my copy is a paid copy of Windows 7).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30994274</id>
	<title>Re:What service....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265121540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What service does this auto shutting down reside in and how do we disable it?</p></div><p>They provide some solutions here:</p><p>http://www.microsoft.com/windows/buy/default.aspx</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What service does this auto shutting down reside in and how do we disable it ? They provide some solutions here : http : //www.microsoft.com/windows/buy/default.aspx</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What service does this auto shutting down reside in and how do we disable it?They provide some solutions here:http://www.microsoft.com/windows/buy/default.aspx
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988782</id>
	<title>Re:Open Source/Linux's Failure To Capitalize</title>
	<author>kurt\_harlan</author>
	<datestamp>1265026080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have never had this sort of experience when sampling any of the readily available linux distros.

As an aside, it's difficult to sort through any post that is a bunch of generalities with NO ACTUAL information or links to actual information.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have never had this sort of experience when sampling any of the readily available linux distros .
As an aside , it 's difficult to sort through any post that is a bunch of generalities with NO ACTUAL information or links to actual information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have never had this sort of experience when sampling any of the readily available linux distros.
As an aside, it's difficult to sort through any post that is a bunch of generalities with NO ACTUAL information or links to actual information.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988462</id>
	<title>obligatory ....</title>
	<author>Brigadier</author>
	<datestamp>1265024940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ok, aaand how is this any different from what happens now ?</p><p>"......Windows 7 RC will automatically shut down every two hours. Those shutdowns will come without warning."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ok , aaand how is this any different from what happens now ?
" ......Windows 7 RC will automatically shut down every two hours .
Those shutdowns will come without warning .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ok, aaand how is this any different from what happens now ?
"......Windows 7 RC will automatically shut down every two hours.
Those shutdowns will come without warning.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988908</id>
	<title>Re:What's different?</title>
	<author>Hellswaters</author>
	<datestamp>1265026560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Whenever I use Windows, it always seems to shut itself down frequently when I'm in the middle of working on something. There's Blue Screens, automagic updates, and random freezes. So, what's different about this? It isn't going to change the uptime very much.</p></div><p>I got the retail of windows 7, never had a blue sceen, turned off automatic update (so it never reboots because of updating) and never had a freeze caused by the OS. I had the exact same experience with the RC. And, for the most part, same with the beta (minor issues, but it was a beta version)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whenever I use Windows , it always seems to shut itself down frequently when I 'm in the middle of working on something .
There 's Blue Screens , automagic updates , and random freezes .
So , what 's different about this ?
It is n't going to change the uptime very much.I got the retail of windows 7 , never had a blue sceen , turned off automatic update ( so it never reboots because of updating ) and never had a freeze caused by the OS .
I had the exact same experience with the RC .
And , for the most part , same with the beta ( minor issues , but it was a beta version )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whenever I use Windows, it always seems to shut itself down frequently when I'm in the middle of working on something.
There's Blue Screens, automagic updates, and random freezes.
So, what's different about this?
It isn't going to change the uptime very much.I got the retail of windows 7, never had a blue sceen, turned off automatic update (so it never reboots because of updating) and never had a freeze caused by the OS.
I had the exact same experience with the RC.
And, for the most part, same with the beta (minor issues, but it was a beta version)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.31001740</id>
	<title>Re:What's different?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265108220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you don't see them any more because they did away with them.</p><p>they replaced the bsod with a quick reset, and by the time you were just starting to roll with your MS rant, your system was back up and you were at your desktop.</p><p>this pacified a lot of people.</p><p>honestly,   the number of bsods i got were very few in Win2k.   I got about the same number of quick "resets" in XP, and I've had about the same number in Vista.</p><p>Windows has always been stable for me since the NT line.   I was careful about my driver selection, and my dll management<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....later when microsoft took these tasks over, i continued to have infrequent bsods/resets.</p><p>3 or 4 times a year.</p><p>compared to linux though, i've honestly never had a hard lock on my linux desktop that wasn't caused by me doing something overtly stupid.</p><p>the other thing is, i still cannot leave my vista workstation running week after week, never powering down.  just like windows of old, the weekly reboot is still a good thing.</p><p>linux on the other hand. this isn't a problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you do n't see them any more because they did away with them.they replaced the bsod with a quick reset , and by the time you were just starting to roll with your MS rant , your system was back up and you were at your desktop.this pacified a lot of people.honestly , the number of bsods i got were very few in Win2k .
I got about the same number of quick " resets " in XP , and I 've had about the same number in Vista.Windows has always been stable for me since the NT line .
I was careful about my driver selection , and my dll management ....later when microsoft took these tasks over , i continued to have infrequent bsods/resets.3 or 4 times a year.compared to linux though , i 've honestly never had a hard lock on my linux desktop that was n't caused by me doing something overtly stupid.the other thing is , i still can not leave my vista workstation running week after week , never powering down .
just like windows of old , the weekly reboot is still a good thing.linux on the other hand .
this is n't a problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you don't see them any more because they did away with them.they replaced the bsod with a quick reset, and by the time you were just starting to roll with your MS rant, your system was back up and you were at your desktop.this pacified a lot of people.honestly,   the number of bsods i got were very few in Win2k.
I got about the same number of quick "resets" in XP, and I've had about the same number in Vista.Windows has always been stable for me since the NT line.
I was careful about my driver selection, and my dll management ....later when microsoft took these tasks over, i continued to have infrequent bsods/resets.3 or 4 times a year.compared to linux though, i've honestly never had a hard lock on my linux desktop that wasn't caused by me doing something overtly stupid.the other thing is, i still cannot leave my vista workstation running week after week, never powering down.
just like windows of old, the weekly reboot is still a good thing.linux on the other hand.
this isn't a problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30993342</id>
	<title>Re:What's different?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265113680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We saw it (black screen of death) twice in our lab, except it wasn't just a BSOD, but required we insert the Win 7 DVD and repair the installation, not once, but twice. What's more amazing was that it crashed both times over the weekend when no one was around. Repairing worked, but who wants to go through the aggravation of repairing an OS every weekend? The same system runs XP Pro just fine.</p><p>Eventually we'll upgrade to Windows 7, but they better get that SP1 out soon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We saw it ( black screen of death ) twice in our lab , except it was n't just a BSOD , but required we insert the Win 7 DVD and repair the installation , not once , but twice .
What 's more amazing was that it crashed both times over the weekend when no one was around .
Repairing worked , but who wants to go through the aggravation of repairing an OS every weekend ?
The same system runs XP Pro just fine.Eventually we 'll upgrade to Windows 7 , but they better get that SP1 out soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We saw it (black screen of death) twice in our lab, except it wasn't just a BSOD, but required we insert the Win 7 DVD and repair the installation, not once, but twice.
What's more amazing was that it crashed both times over the weekend when no one was around.
Repairing worked, but who wants to go through the aggravation of repairing an OS every weekend?
The same system runs XP Pro just fine.Eventually we'll upgrade to Windows 7, but they better get that SP1 out soon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418</id>
	<title>..so?</title>
	<author>monoi</author>
	<datestamp>1265024760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unless they're also going to disable booting an Ubuntu install DVD, I don't see how anyone could have a problem with this.

Windows is a commercial product. If you don't want to pay for it, use one of the entirely credible free alternatives.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless they 're also going to disable booting an Ubuntu install DVD , I do n't see how anyone could have a problem with this .
Windows is a commercial product .
If you do n't want to pay for it , use one of the entirely credible free alternatives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless they're also going to disable booting an Ubuntu install DVD, I don't see how anyone could have a problem with this.
Windows is a commercial product.
If you don't want to pay for it, use one of the entirely credible free alternatives.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990282</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>petermgreen</author>
	<datestamp>1265034240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>XP is not an option since he wants to use the full memory instead of being limited to 3.5Gig. </i><br>There is always XP professional x64 edition<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>XP is not an option since he wants to use the full memory instead of being limited to 3.5Gig .
There is always XP professional x64 edition ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>XP is not an option since he wants to use the full memory instead of being limited to 3.5Gig.
There is always XP professional x64 edition ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989504</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>secolactico</author>
	<datestamp>1265029320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nothing wrong with Windows 7, tho.  I don't see why the reluctance to switch from XP.</p><p>I remember when XP came out and activation was the hot issue, everybody was saying how they would never consider switching from Windows 2000 to XP.  Now it's the same story with Windows 7 and XP.</p><p>I have been using Win7 64 bits with no issues whatsoever and about the only software that I have found not to run was "Vampire the Masquerade Bloodlines", but then again, that game was buggy even in the recommended OS.</p><p>UAC was not the pain I thought it was going to be and the control panel has been streamlined from the mess that was Vista's.</p><p>If you are going to buy a Windows OS, I see no reason to get XP over 7 unless you have hardware issues.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nothing wrong with Windows 7 , tho .
I do n't see why the reluctance to switch from XP.I remember when XP came out and activation was the hot issue , everybody was saying how they would never consider switching from Windows 2000 to XP .
Now it 's the same story with Windows 7 and XP.I have been using Win7 64 bits with no issues whatsoever and about the only software that I have found not to run was " Vampire the Masquerade Bloodlines " , but then again , that game was buggy even in the recommended OS.UAC was not the pain I thought it was going to be and the control panel has been streamlined from the mess that was Vista 's.If you are going to buy a Windows OS , I see no reason to get XP over 7 unless you have hardware issues .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nothing wrong with Windows 7, tho.
I don't see why the reluctance to switch from XP.I remember when XP came out and activation was the hot issue, everybody was saying how they would never consider switching from Windows 2000 to XP.
Now it's the same story with Windows 7 and XP.I have been using Win7 64 bits with no issues whatsoever and about the only software that I have found not to run was "Vampire the Masquerade Bloodlines", but then again, that game was buggy even in the recommended OS.UAC was not the pain I thought it was going to be and the control panel has been streamlined from the mess that was Vista's.If you are going to buy a Windows OS, I see no reason to get XP over 7 unless you have hardware issues.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30993548</id>
	<title>Re:I'm glad there's no bias in the reporting on /.</title>
	<author>tehcyder</author>
	<datestamp>1265115840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Completely devoid of any bias <strong>towards</strong> Microsoft/Windows.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
I think you meant <strong>against</strong> if you were being sarcastic.
<br>
But, hey, apart from the fact that it completely inverted the meaning of your post, who cares about spelling/grammar on slashdot?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Completely devoid of any bias towards Microsoft/Windows .
I think you meant against if you were being sarcastic .
But , hey , apart from the fact that it completely inverted the meaning of your post , who cares about spelling/grammar on slashdot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Completely devoid of any bias towards Microsoft/Windows.
I think you meant against if you were being sarcastic.
But, hey, apart from the fact that it completely inverted the meaning of your post, who cares about spelling/grammar on slashdot?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988540</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.31001614</id>
	<title>Re:Win 7 RC was good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265107560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That crack was good, gonna go back fer more!!!!</p><p>so says the junkie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That crack was good , gon na go back fer more ! ! !
! so says the junkie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That crack was good, gonna go back fer more!!!
!so says the junkie.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992040</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>ScottCooperDotNet</author>
	<datestamp>1265051280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This isn't anything new, either.  Exchange Server's RCs (2000, I think) used to crash the service several times a day, by design, after one year from the install date.  One small businessman that I knew used to just reload his mail server then, so this change would have affected his behavior (or he'd set his date back<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't anything new , either .
Exchange Server 's RCs ( 2000 , I think ) used to crash the service several times a day , by design , after one year from the install date .
One small businessman that I knew used to just reload his mail server then , so this change would have affected his behavior ( or he 'd set his date back : ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't anything new, either.
Exchange Server's RCs (2000, I think) used to crash the service several times a day, by design, after one year from the install date.
One small businessman that I knew used to just reload his mail server then, so this change would have affected his behavior (or he'd set his date back :).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988972</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265026920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sorry but I am happier with Snow Leopard than I was with Windows and I have used every version since 1992 professionally.  I don't want to start a fight, but there is a time when enough is enough already.  I don't care for Steve Jobs as he is a ruthless leader but the product is solid.</p><p>Thanks for your time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry but I am happier with Snow Leopard than I was with Windows and I have used every version since 1992 professionally .
I do n't want to start a fight , but there is a time when enough is enough already .
I do n't care for Steve Jobs as he is a ruthless leader but the product is solid.Thanks for your time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry but I am happier with Snow Leopard than I was with Windows and I have used every version since 1992 professionally.
I don't want to start a fight, but there is a time when enough is enough already.
I don't care for Steve Jobs as he is a ruthless leader but the product is solid.Thanks for your time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991162</id>
	<title>Re:..so?</title>
	<author>TheVelvetFlamebait</author>
	<datestamp>1265041020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or people with conscience.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or people with conscience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or people with conscience.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989936</id>
	<title>Re:What's different?</title>
	<author>Belial6</author>
	<datestamp>1265031840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I get crashes about once a week.  The who system just shuts down.  Of course, this COULD have something to do with the fact that I have a video card that says you need a 300 watt power supply, and the computer has an 80 watt power supply in it.
<br> <br>

Anyone know of a decent power supply that will fit in a Gateway low profile case?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I get crashes about once a week .
The who system just shuts down .
Of course , this COULD have something to do with the fact that I have a video card that says you need a 300 watt power supply , and the computer has an 80 watt power supply in it .
Anyone know of a decent power supply that will fit in a Gateway low profile case ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I get crashes about once a week.
The who system just shuts down.
Of course, this COULD have something to do with the fact that I have a video card that says you need a 300 watt power supply, and the computer has an 80 watt power supply in it.
Anyone know of a decent power supply that will fit in a Gateway low profile case?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988686</id>
	<title>Re:I'm glad there's no bias in the reporting on /.</title>
	<author>recoiledsnake</author>
	<datestamp>1265025780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me guess, you're new to Slashdot? This site is not news for nerds, it's news for anti-'M$' nerds. You won't see a story here about Windows 7 increasing Microsoft revenue. Just plain FUD and negative articles about MS abound on here.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The huge success of Windows 7 helped Microsoft romp to $19bn of revenue for the quarter, earning $6.6bn in profit. It was a record three months for Windows sales, with a whopping 60 million Windows 7 licences shifted.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me guess , you 're new to Slashdot ?
This site is not news for nerds , it 's news for anti- 'M $ ' nerds .
You wo n't see a story here about Windows 7 increasing Microsoft revenue .
Just plain FUD and negative articles about MS abound on here.The huge success of Windows 7 helped Microsoft romp to $ 19bn of revenue for the quarter , earning $ 6.6bn in profit .
It was a record three months for Windows sales , with a whopping 60 million Windows 7 licences shifted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me guess, you're new to Slashdot?
This site is not news for nerds, it's news for anti-'M$' nerds.
You won't see a story here about Windows 7 increasing Microsoft revenue.
Just plain FUD and negative articles about MS abound on here.The huge success of Windows 7 helped Microsoft romp to $19bn of revenue for the quarter, earning $6.6bn in profit.
It was a record three months for Windows sales, with a whopping 60 million Windows 7 licences shifted.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988540</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990474</id>
	<title>Re:I'm glad there's no bias in the reporting on /.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265035620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why the upset human people units? Because the full version is incredibly overpriced for the small improvements over the last version that they released about a YEAR before this NEW and improved ULTRA-EXTREME SUPER WINDOWS SEVENdythirtyteen.... Slag, it's Slag. We want to Slag them for this crap.</p><p>But releasing a 300$ UPPGRAYYED,,, IS pretty SLACK.<br>I agree.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why the upset human people units ?
Because the full version is incredibly overpriced for the small improvements over the last version that they released about a YEAR before this NEW and improved ULTRA-EXTREME SUPER WINDOWS SEVENdythirtyteen.... Slag , it 's Slag .
We want to Slag them for this crap.But releasing a 300 $ UPPGRAYYED,, , IS pretty SLACK.I agree .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why the upset human people units?
Because the full version is incredibly overpriced for the small improvements over the last version that they released about a YEAR before this NEW and improved ULTRA-EXTREME SUPER WINDOWS SEVENdythirtyteen.... Slag, it's Slag.
We want to Slag them for this crap.But releasing a 300$ UPPGRAYYED,,, IS pretty SLACK.I agree.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988540</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989340</id>
	<title>Re:Oh wow!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265028480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I get to pay<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p> </div><p>You don't. You are free to take your money elsewhere - say, to Apple - or keep them to yourself and install some free Linux distro.</p><p>Of course, you might want to ask yourself why <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60R71A20100129" title="reuters.com">so many people</a> [reuters.com] are willing to fork out the cash for an "operating system that consistently breaks". Perhaps your last Windows experience, circa 2001 (a scarred WinME user?), is a tad outdated, don't you think?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I get to pay ... You do n't .
You are free to take your money elsewhere - say , to Apple - or keep them to yourself and install some free Linux distro.Of course , you might want to ask yourself why so many people [ reuters.com ] are willing to fork out the cash for an " operating system that consistently breaks " .
Perhaps your last Windows experience , circa 2001 ( a scarred WinME user ?
) , is a tad outdated , do n't you think ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I get to pay ... You don't.
You are free to take your money elsewhere - say, to Apple - or keep them to yourself and install some free Linux distro.Of course, you might want to ask yourself why so many people [reuters.com] are willing to fork out the cash for an "operating system that consistently breaks".
Perhaps your last Windows experience, circa 2001 (a scarred WinME user?
), is a tad outdated, don't you think?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30994448</id>
	<title>This was clearly expected!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265122680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>well the RC came with very clear instructions.. free development copy.. annoying times with shutdowns etc.. and slashdot even publishes the story.. its lame for slashdot to publish it.. I am disappointed...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>well the RC came with very clear instructions.. free development copy.. annoying times with shutdowns etc.. and slashdot even publishes the story.. its lame for slashdot to publish it.. I am disappointed.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well the RC came with very clear instructions.. free development copy.. annoying times with shutdowns etc.. and slashdot even publishes the story.. its lame for slashdot to publish it.. I am disappointed...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988592</id>
	<title>Open Source/Linux's Failure To Capitalize</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265025480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ten years I've been trying to make the switch from Windows to Linux.</p><p>Ten years of going through the ritual of downloading the latest trendy Linux distro. Ten years of the same amateur junk sending me and the rest of the computing world right back to Windows.</p><p>Inane spinning 3d effects trying to desperately prove that Linux is 'ahead' on the desktop.</p><p>The clusterfuck that is KDE and Gnome.</p><p>Not being able to just click on a news story about new piece of software because the bearded GNU freak who is in charge of the pointless 'packaging' of software for each and every distro is busy with bong hits and World of Warcraft raiding on his Windows partition he doesn't tell anyone about.</p><p>The mass of crapware that is open source software compared to their commercial counterparts.</p><p>These 'lol, microsoft! just install linux' stories would actually be effective if the open source world hadn't been spending all their time jerking each other off here on Slashdot for the past decade instead of actually putting in the hard work of creating a viable and commercial quality desktop and application array.</p><p>Yes, being faced with the choice:</p><p>Pay for Windows 7<br>Track down a safe and working pirated copy<br>Switch to the joke that Linux is on the desktop</p><p>We all know which 2 of those 3 the computing world is going to go for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ten years I 've been trying to make the switch from Windows to Linux.Ten years of going through the ritual of downloading the latest trendy Linux distro .
Ten years of the same amateur junk sending me and the rest of the computing world right back to Windows.Inane spinning 3d effects trying to desperately prove that Linux is 'ahead ' on the desktop.The clusterfuck that is KDE and Gnome.Not being able to just click on a news story about new piece of software because the bearded GNU freak who is in charge of the pointless 'packaging ' of software for each and every distro is busy with bong hits and World of Warcraft raiding on his Windows partition he does n't tell anyone about.The mass of crapware that is open source software compared to their commercial counterparts.These 'lol , microsoft !
just install linux ' stories would actually be effective if the open source world had n't been spending all their time jerking each other off here on Slashdot for the past decade instead of actually putting in the hard work of creating a viable and commercial quality desktop and application array.Yes , being faced with the choice : Pay for Windows 7Track down a safe and working pirated copySwitch to the joke that Linux is on the desktopWe all know which 2 of those 3 the computing world is going to go for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ten years I've been trying to make the switch from Windows to Linux.Ten years of going through the ritual of downloading the latest trendy Linux distro.
Ten years of the same amateur junk sending me and the rest of the computing world right back to Windows.Inane spinning 3d effects trying to desperately prove that Linux is 'ahead' on the desktop.The clusterfuck that is KDE and Gnome.Not being able to just click on a news story about new piece of software because the bearded GNU freak who is in charge of the pointless 'packaging' of software for each and every distro is busy with bong hits and World of Warcraft raiding on his Windows partition he doesn't tell anyone about.The mass of crapware that is open source software compared to their commercial counterparts.These 'lol, microsoft!
just install linux' stories would actually be effective if the open source world hadn't been spending all their time jerking each other off here on Slashdot for the past decade instead of actually putting in the hard work of creating a viable and commercial quality desktop and application array.Yes, being faced with the choice:Pay for Windows 7Track down a safe and working pirated copySwitch to the joke that Linux is on the desktopWe all know which 2 of those 3 the computing world is going to go for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992390</id>
	<title>Re:It's a good thing.</title>
	<author>wvmarle</author>
	<datestamp>1265142840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.. Anything MS does is bad and evil. That's all. Nothing new under the sun here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is /.. Anything MS does is bad and evil .
That 's all .
Nothing new under the sun here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is /.. Anything MS does is bad and evil.
That's all.
Nothing new under the sun here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992942</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>Angostura</author>
	<datestamp>1265109300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, if they are anything like me, they may be cheapskates running it in VirtualBox on a Mac. The truth is I very very occasionally need to use Windows - perhaps to install a bit of firmware on something that only has a Windows installer, or perhaps to check how something looks in IE8.</p><p>The fact that I won't be able to use the RC for extended periods seems like an extremely good deal from Microsoft, considering I haven't paid for it, and expected it to be disabled completely this summer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if they are anything like me , they may be cheapskates running it in VirtualBox on a Mac .
The truth is I very very occasionally need to use Windows - perhaps to install a bit of firmware on something that only has a Windows installer , or perhaps to check how something looks in IE8.The fact that I wo n't be able to use the RC for extended periods seems like an extremely good deal from Microsoft , considering I have n't paid for it , and expected it to be disabled completely this summer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if they are anything like me, they may be cheapskates running it in VirtualBox on a Mac.
The truth is I very very occasionally need to use Windows - perhaps to install a bit of firmware on something that only has a Windows installer, or perhaps to check how something looks in IE8.The fact that I won't be able to use the RC for extended periods seems like an extremely good deal from Microsoft, considering I haven't paid for it, and expected it to be disabled completely this summer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990868</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7 networking woes</title>
	<author>dcam</author>
	<datestamp>1265038500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've had issues too, in my case the network isn't available for the first few minutes after booting up.</p><p>In my case apparently this is a known issue with the drivers for my (onboard) network card. I haven't got around to updating them yet as I'm planning to nuke the install with a RTM version shortly.</p><p>Of course not having a network up and running on boot tends to do interesting things to the VMs I have running on my machine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've had issues too , in my case the network is n't available for the first few minutes after booting up.In my case apparently this is a known issue with the drivers for my ( onboard ) network card .
I have n't got around to updating them yet as I 'm planning to nuke the install with a RTM version shortly.Of course not having a network up and running on boot tends to do interesting things to the VMs I have running on my machine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've had issues too, in my case the network isn't available for the first few minutes after booting up.In my case apparently this is a known issue with the drivers for my (onboard) network card.
I haven't got around to updating them yet as I'm planning to nuke the install with a RTM version shortly.Of course not having a network up and running on boot tends to do interesting things to the VMs I have running on my machine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992436</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265143500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> Well perhaps they believe the original marketing that came out with XP, what are you saying the marketdroids were exaggerating and perhaps even telling out and out lies and XP is nowhere near as good as they claimed to be. Besides M$ was really hot on the idea of tying the software licences to hardware, so when hardware died you had to pay for those software licences all over again. </p><p> So why bother upgrading, you'll be forced to pay for additional software licences when the hardware fails anyhow (compulsory OEM sales), you would have to be a real schmuck to fall for that scam. So switch to windows 7, blah, take whatever software your forced to buy with the machine. Of course if you got screwed over with Vista instead of XP, well, why not reward M$ for selling you beta software pretending it is a final product.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well perhaps they believe the original marketing that came out with XP , what are you saying the marketdroids were exaggerating and perhaps even telling out and out lies and XP is nowhere near as good as they claimed to be .
Besides M $ was really hot on the idea of tying the software licences to hardware , so when hardware died you had to pay for those software licences all over again .
So why bother upgrading , you 'll be forced to pay for additional software licences when the hardware fails anyhow ( compulsory OEM sales ) , you would have to be a real schmuck to fall for that scam .
So switch to windows 7 , blah , take whatever software your forced to buy with the machine .
Of course if you got screwed over with Vista instead of XP , well , why not reward M $ for selling you beta software pretending it is a final product .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Well perhaps they believe the original marketing that came out with XP, what are you saying the marketdroids were exaggerating and perhaps even telling out and out lies and XP is nowhere near as good as they claimed to be.
Besides M$ was really hot on the idea of tying the software licences to hardware, so when hardware died you had to pay for those software licences all over again.
So why bother upgrading, you'll be forced to pay for additional software licences when the hardware fails anyhow (compulsory OEM sales), you would have to be a real schmuck to fall for that scam.
So switch to windows 7, blah, take whatever software your forced to buy with the machine.
Of course if you got screwed over with Vista instead of XP, well, why not reward M$ for selling you beta software pretending it is a final product.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989112</id>
	<title>Oh wow!</title>
	<author>YankDownUnder</author>
	<datestamp>1265027460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Jeepers! I get to pay top dollar now for an operating system that consistently breaks, consistently does NOT have any usable applications built-in, has a SINGLE desktop, NO security, and an eternal stream of patches and bandages! Gosh, it's got pretty graphics, though, doesn't it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Jeepers !
I get to pay top dollar now for an operating system that consistently breaks , consistently does NOT have any usable applications built-in , has a SINGLE desktop , NO security , and an eternal stream of patches and bandages !
Gosh , it 's got pretty graphics , though , does n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jeepers!
I get to pay top dollar now for an operating system that consistently breaks, consistently does NOT have any usable applications built-in, has a SINGLE desktop, NO security, and an eternal stream of patches and bandages!
Gosh, it's got pretty graphics, though, doesn't it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991800</id>
	<title>Never got the thing to work any way.</title>
	<author>richardkelleher</author>
	<datestamp>1265048220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I tried to install RC on an older Dell workstation.  7 didn't like the network card, the video card and I think it had problems other things as well.  I just turned the thing off and left it.  I figure that I will install Linux on it again some time in the future.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I tried to install RC on an older Dell workstation .
7 did n't like the network card , the video card and I think it had problems other things as well .
I just turned the thing off and left it .
I figure that I will install Linux on it again some time in the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tried to install RC on an older Dell workstation.
7 didn't like the network card, the video card and I think it had problems other things as well.
I just turned the thing off and left it.
I figure that I will install Linux on it again some time in the future.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991426</id>
	<title>Re:Really?  Yeah REALLY</title>
	<author>X'16435934</author>
	<datestamp>1265043720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Son, ya got a lot to learn.  <br>
You sound lake a linux-weenie, kid.  <br>
I run a "sweet-spot" desktop that was home-built a coupla years ago. And I installed the 1st Win-7 on it more than a year ago. <br>
Heh-heh.  It was sweet-spot 2 years ago..  but-  <br>
It's an AMD-64 now running 7100 ultimate.   On only 2 Gig <br>
And is fast, according to my nerdy gamer sons, whose  time should be better spent writing their theses, instead of this nonsense about Warcraft and other silly stuff.  <br>
Looks like I'll hafta bite the bullet in the next coupla months and pay out - what? $250+  for Ultimate?  I NEED them bitlboncker  and other features, sonny!<br>
Either that,  or spend more time in my Ubuntu partition... <br>
<br>
Hey, ya got a job kid? <br>
If'n ya don't<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. we need some   PHP / SQL / Apache experience -  golly it's Linux too! You lucked in!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Son , ya got a lot to learn .
You sound lake a linux-weenie , kid .
I run a " sweet-spot " desktop that was home-built a coupla years ago .
And I installed the 1st Win-7 on it more than a year ago .
Heh-heh. It was sweet-spot 2 years ago.. but- It 's an AMD-64 now running 7100 ultimate .
On only 2 Gig And is fast , according to my nerdy gamer sons , whose time should be better spent writing their theses , instead of this nonsense about Warcraft and other silly stuff .
Looks like I 'll hafta bite the bullet in the next coupla months and pay out - what ?
$ 250 + for Ultimate ?
I NEED them bitlboncker and other features , sonny !
Either that , or spend more time in my Ubuntu partition.. . Hey , ya got a job kid ?
If'n ya do n't .. we need some PHP / SQL / Apache experience - golly it 's Linux too !
You lucked in !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Son, ya got a lot to learn.
You sound lake a linux-weenie, kid.
I run a "sweet-spot" desktop that was home-built a coupla years ago.
And I installed the 1st Win-7 on it more than a year ago.
Heh-heh.  It was sweet-spot 2 years ago..  but-  
It's an AMD-64 now running 7100 ultimate.
On only 2 Gig 
And is fast, according to my nerdy gamer sons, whose  time should be better spent writing their theses, instead of this nonsense about Warcraft and other silly stuff.
Looks like I'll hafta bite the bullet in the next coupla months and pay out - what?
$250+  for Ultimate?
I NEED them bitlboncker  and other features, sonny!
Either that,  or spend more time in my Ubuntu partition... 

Hey, ya got a job kid?
If'n ya don't .. we need some   PHP / SQL / Apache experience -  golly it's Linux too!
You lucked in!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990094</id>
	<title>Re:..so?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265032800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Free or not, this disturbs me.  Many things have disturbed me as of late.  When the computer controls YOU, it ceases to become a "personal" computer.  I've had this problem with Windows.  Forcing reboots after updates (Yes I know that can be disabled, but I shouldn't have to edit an obscure setting).  As a result, I don't run code any more from companies that force me to do what THEY want.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Free or not , this disturbs me .
Many things have disturbed me as of late .
When the computer controls YOU , it ceases to become a " personal " computer .
I 've had this problem with Windows .
Forcing reboots after updates ( Yes I know that can be disabled , but I should n't have to edit an obscure setting ) .
As a result , I do n't run code any more from companies that force me to do what THEY want .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Free or not, this disturbs me.
Many things have disturbed me as of late.
When the computer controls YOU, it ceases to become a "personal" computer.
I've had this problem with Windows.
Forcing reboots after updates (Yes I know that can be disabled, but I shouldn't have to edit an obscure setting).
As a result, I don't run code any more from companies that force me to do what THEY want.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989030</id>
	<title>Re:time...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265027160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I honestly don't see why the parent should modded "troll". After all, nearly everyone who buys a PC has already paid microsoft when they bought their PC. And of course we all collectively pay in billions of dollars and an absurdly high amount of time wasted per year due to their monopoly over so much of the business and government infrastructure. I say if you really want the new windows, go ahead and <a href="http://thepiratebay.org/search/windows\%207/0/99/300" title="thepiratebay.org">just take it</a> [thepiratebay.org].  You already paid for it, and you'll continue to pay for it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I honestly do n't see why the parent should modded " troll " .
After all , nearly everyone who buys a PC has already paid microsoft when they bought their PC .
And of course we all collectively pay in billions of dollars and an absurdly high amount of time wasted per year due to their monopoly over so much of the business and government infrastructure .
I say if you really want the new windows , go ahead and just take it [ thepiratebay.org ] .
You already paid for it , and you 'll continue to pay for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I honestly don't see why the parent should modded "troll".
After all, nearly everyone who buys a PC has already paid microsoft when they bought their PC.
And of course we all collectively pay in billions of dollars and an absurdly high amount of time wasted per year due to their monopoly over so much of the business and government infrastructure.
I say if you really want the new windows, go ahead and just take it [thepiratebay.org].
You already paid for it, and you'll continue to pay for it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30995760</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1265128140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course it's news. Who would have ever thought that MS would sink to CHARGING for their software?!?!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course it 's news .
Who would have ever thought that MS would sink to CHARGING for their software ? ! ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course it's news.
Who would have ever thought that MS would sink to CHARGING for their software?!?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989236</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>LordVader717</author>
	<datestamp>1265028000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What gets me annoyed is that it won't accept my authentic license keys, presumably because they're for the wrong version of language. That means I can't activate it without having to wipe the system and download and burn the installation media.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What gets me annoyed is that it wo n't accept my authentic license keys , presumably because they 're for the wrong version of language .
That means I ca n't activate it without having to wipe the system and download and burn the installation media .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What gets me annoyed is that it won't accept my authentic license keys, presumably because they're for the wrong version of language.
That means I can't activate it without having to wipe the system and download and burn the installation media.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992046</id>
	<title>Re:I'm glad there's no bias in the reporting on /.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265051400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Increased M$ revenue?  Surely you jest!  We have been hearing on this fair and balanced site every year that M$ is about to become irrelevant, the end is nigh and this year is the Year of Linux on the Desktop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Increased M $ revenue ?
Surely you jest !
We have been hearing on this fair and balanced site every year that M $ is about to become irrelevant , the end is nigh and this year is the Year of Linux on the Desktop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Increased M$ revenue?
Surely you jest!
We have been hearing on this fair and balanced site every year that M$ is about to become irrelevant, the end is nigh and this year is the Year of Linux on the Desktop.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988686</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988658</id>
	<title>Ask Slashdot:</title>
	<author>countertrolling</author>
	<datestamp>1265025660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you expect people to get upset over this? What, are they expecting it to just keep on going? My copy never got out of the virtual box. It's just there to figure out how to learn WTF. Come March.. or February, or whenever, whoopee! 25gb freed up.. for the hacked copy.. just kidding. No name, home made boxes with XP are a booming business right now. 7 is still a giant kludge. It's like Microsoft <i>wants</i> people to switch. Seems to be working.. Lots more Macs in my neighborhood.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you expect people to get upset over this ?
What , are they expecting it to just keep on going ?
My copy never got out of the virtual box .
It 's just there to figure out how to learn WTF .
Come March.. or February , or whenever , whoopee !
25gb freed up.. for the hacked copy.. just kidding .
No name , home made boxes with XP are a booming business right now .
7 is still a giant kludge .
It 's like Microsoft wants people to switch .
Seems to be working.. Lots more Macs in my neighborhood .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you expect people to get upset over this?
What, are they expecting it to just keep on going?
My copy never got out of the virtual box.
It's just there to figure out how to learn WTF.
Come March.. or February, or whenever, whoopee!
25gb freed up.. for the hacked copy.. just kidding.
No name, home made boxes with XP are a booming business right now.
7 is still a giant kludge.
It's like Microsoft wants people to switch.
Seems to be working.. Lots more Macs in my neighborhood.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.31004328</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7 Wiped My Drive Clean</title>
	<author>Aphoxema</author>
	<datestamp>1265123520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It could have been much worse. Thank God windows does not understand the ext fs.</p></div><p>Not natively, but you can read EXT2 and 3 with "EXT Installable File System". Works great, gives Windows a good opportunity to kill your GNU/Linux installations too.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It could have been much worse .
Thank God windows does not understand the ext fs.Not natively , but you can read EXT2 and 3 with " EXT Installable File System " .
Works great , gives Windows a good opportunity to kill your GNU/Linux installations too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It could have been much worse.
Thank God windows does not understand the ext fs.Not natively, but you can read EXT2 and 3 with "EXT Installable File System".
Works great, gives Windows a good opportunity to kill your GNU/Linux installations too.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989732</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992638</id>
	<title>Re:What's different?</title>
	<author>Firehawke</author>
	<datestamp>1265103480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Had some early chipset driver issues in XP way back in the day (a six month period of major problems between Detonator drivers and Via's 4-in-1 chipset drivers) but in recent years (XP, Vista, and Win7) I've only had problems from the rare occasional "driver went very very wrong" crash or dying hardware crash.</p><p>BSODs don't show up nearly as much as they did back in the 9X days, that's for sure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Had some early chipset driver issues in XP way back in the day ( a six month period of major problems between Detonator drivers and Via 's 4-in-1 chipset drivers ) but in recent years ( XP , Vista , and Win7 ) I 've only had problems from the rare occasional " driver went very very wrong " crash or dying hardware crash.BSODs do n't show up nearly as much as they did back in the 9X days , that 's for sure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Had some early chipset driver issues in XP way back in the day (a six month period of major problems between Detonator drivers and Via's 4-in-1 chipset drivers) but in recent years (XP, Vista, and Win7) I've only had problems from the rare occasional "driver went very very wrong" crash or dying hardware crash.BSODs don't show up nearly as much as they did back in the 9X days, that's for sure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989040</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265027220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know, I think that if I'm told a beta is going to be valid until June, I wouldn't expect harassment 3 months before that time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know , I think that if I 'm told a beta is going to be valid until June , I would n't expect harassment 3 months before that time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know, I think that if I'm told a beta is going to be valid until June, I wouldn't expect harassment 3 months before that time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988736</id>
	<title>So what?</title>
	<author>markdavis</author>
	<datestamp>1265025900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So what?  Are there people stupid enough to think that a demo version of any software will run forever without nagging and shutting down, or going into limp mode?  This is a completely stupid article totally unworthy of being posted on Slashdot.</p><p>If you want a legal, free, [modern] OS without nagging or shutting down, install Linux, BSD, or OpenSolaris.  Otherwise, pay up or shut up!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So what ?
Are there people stupid enough to think that a demo version of any software will run forever without nagging and shutting down , or going into limp mode ?
This is a completely stupid article totally unworthy of being posted on Slashdot.If you want a legal , free , [ modern ] OS without nagging or shutting down , install Linux , BSD , or OpenSolaris .
Otherwise , pay up or shut up !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what?
Are there people stupid enough to think that a demo version of any software will run forever without nagging and shutting down, or going into limp mode?
This is a completely stupid article totally unworthy of being posted on Slashdot.If you want a legal, free, [modern] OS without nagging or shutting down, install Linux, BSD, or OpenSolaris.
Otherwise, pay up or shut up!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988816</id>
	<title>Re:..so?</title>
	<author>Hellswaters</author>
	<datestamp>1265026200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why does this commercial product work at all without payment?</p></div><p>Its the release client, mostly a demo product, for people to try it before the retail version is released, so that they could go and buy it knowing that is better than Vista</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does this commercial product work at all without payment ? Its the release client , mostly a demo product , for people to try it before the retail version is released , so that they could go and buy it knowing that is better than Vista</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does this commercial product work at all without payment?Its the release client, mostly a demo product, for people to try it before the retail version is released, so that they could go and buy it knowing that is better than Vista
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989572</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>LonnieC</author>
	<datestamp>1265029740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've managed to run it for a few years on a couple computers with no major issues. I've never had any issues finding drivers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've managed to run it for a few years on a couple computers with no major issues .
I 've never had any issues finding drivers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've managed to run it for a few years on a couple computers with no major issues.
I've never had any issues finding drivers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992132</id>
	<title>Re:What's different?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265052540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i had win7 running in a vm and something went all bear shaped<br>bluescreened.  reset the vm and it showed up again.</p><p>to get a bluescreen nowadays, something really screwy must happen</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i had win7 running in a vm and something went all bear shapedbluescreened .
reset the vm and it showed up again.to get a bluescreen nowadays , something really screwy must happen</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i had win7 running in a vm and something went all bear shapedbluescreened.
reset the vm and it showed up again.to get a bluescreen nowadays, something really screwy must happen</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30994290</id>
	<title>TimerNuke</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265121600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.mydigitallife.info/2008/12/30/timernuke-crack-free-download-to-disable-activation-of-windows-7-and-server-2008/" title="mydigitallife.info" rel="nofollow">timernuke...</a> [mydigitallife.info]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>timernuke... [ mydigitallife.info ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>timernuke... [mydigitallife.info]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400</id>
	<title>Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265024700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>BFD. You didn't pay for it, and it's Microsoft. What do you expect?</htmltext>
<tokenext>BFD .
You did n't pay for it , and it 's Microsoft .
What do you expect ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BFD.
You didn't pay for it, and it's Microsoft.
What do you expect?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988424</id>
	<title>Duh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265024760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This should not be a surprise to anyone.  Why is this news?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This should not be a surprise to anyone .
Why is this news ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This should not be a surprise to anyone.
Why is this news?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992220</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>Sir\_Sri</author>
	<datestamp>1265053800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only really rich enthusiasts replace every year, there is relatively little value in it.  Jumping between generations, ATI 4K series to 5K series, (or nvidia 200 to 300 series), arguably core 2's to core i7's aren't terrible ideas.  Expensive, but at least you're getting a significant jumps in capabilities, whether you care about those capabilities is another matter.  But if you run what would be a new top of the line machine today, with up to date software, and then compare that to a 5 year old equivalent and the difference, even to the average end user is pretty stark.</p><p>The business cycle is driven by a combination of technical and basic user requirements.  After 5 years your employees start to complain that the crappy machine you bought 5 years ago is extremely crappy compared even to the garbage they bought.  And most computer components in my experience in a big business environment have a failure rate of around 50\% at 6 years  (which is usually capacitor failures but is rarely worth fixing on an IT guys end).  On a home use basis where the machine is in a well cleaned area and off a lot you can do better than that... usually.  You naturally want to start replacing before the 50\% failure rate hits you.  When one important guys computer doesn't work it's a mild nuisance, when 3 or 4 important guys are having computer trouble you better hope your resume is up to date.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only really rich enthusiasts replace every year , there is relatively little value in it .
Jumping between generations , ATI 4K series to 5K series , ( or nvidia 200 to 300 series ) , arguably core 2 's to core i7 's are n't terrible ideas .
Expensive , but at least you 're getting a significant jumps in capabilities , whether you care about those capabilities is another matter .
But if you run what would be a new top of the line machine today , with up to date software , and then compare that to a 5 year old equivalent and the difference , even to the average end user is pretty stark.The business cycle is driven by a combination of technical and basic user requirements .
After 5 years your employees start to complain that the crappy machine you bought 5 years ago is extremely crappy compared even to the garbage they bought .
And most computer components in my experience in a big business environment have a failure rate of around 50 \ % at 6 years ( which is usually capacitor failures but is rarely worth fixing on an IT guys end ) .
On a home use basis where the machine is in a well cleaned area and off a lot you can do better than that... usually. You naturally want to start replacing before the 50 \ % failure rate hits you .
When one important guys computer does n't work it 's a mild nuisance , when 3 or 4 important guys are having computer trouble you better hope your resume is up to date .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only really rich enthusiasts replace every year, there is relatively little value in it.
Jumping between generations, ATI 4K series to 5K series, (or nvidia 200 to 300 series), arguably core 2's to core i7's aren't terrible ideas.
Expensive, but at least you're getting a significant jumps in capabilities, whether you care about those capabilities is another matter.
But if you run what would be a new top of the line machine today, with up to date software, and then compare that to a 5 year old equivalent and the difference, even to the average end user is pretty stark.The business cycle is driven by a combination of technical and basic user requirements.
After 5 years your employees start to complain that the crappy machine you bought 5 years ago is extremely crappy compared even to the garbage they bought.
And most computer components in my experience in a big business environment have a failure rate of around 50\% at 6 years  (which is usually capacitor failures but is rarely worth fixing on an IT guys end).
On a home use basis where the machine is in a well cleaned area and off a lot you can do better than that... usually.  You naturally want to start replacing before the 50\% failure rate hits you.
When one important guys computer doesn't work it's a mild nuisance, when 3 or 4 important guys are having computer trouble you better hope your resume is up to date.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990892</id>
	<title>Re:..so?</title>
	<author>RMS Eats Toejam</author>
	<datestamp>1265038680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>entirely credible free alternatives.</p></div><p>Ha ha ha.  "Free" and "entirely credible" don't mix.  Nice try though.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>entirely credible free alternatives.Ha ha ha .
" Free " and " entirely credible " do n't mix .
Nice try though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>entirely credible free alternatives.Ha ha ha.
"Free" and "entirely credible" don't mix.
Nice try though.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989696</id>
	<title>Those relying on an RC</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1265030520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't care who's software it is, if its been released for this long, its time to pony up or just quit using it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't care who 's software it is , if its been released for this long , its time to pony up or just quit using it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't care who's software it is, if its been released for this long, its time to pony up or just quit using it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988902</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265026560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a reminder that there will be several reminders and then Win7RC will shut down. People forget. It's been a year since they installed the system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a reminder that there will be several reminders and then Win7RC will shut down .
People forget .
It 's been a year since they installed the system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a reminder that there will be several reminders and then Win7RC will shut down.
People forget.
It's been a year since they installed the system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989762</id>
	<title>Re:..so?</title>
	<author>acalltoreason</author>
	<datestamp>1265030880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>&gt; Exactly right.  Bootleg Windows is the #1 competition to Linux.  So if ya want to bring about "The Year of the Linux Desktop" helping Microsoft turn the screws on unlicensed installs is probably the most productive thing a non-coder can do.  Especially outside the US.</p></div><p>I sincerely doubt that Linux will, in the near future, become mainstream like Windows. Linux is too difficult for the average computer user to use.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Exactly right .
Bootleg Windows is the # 1 competition to Linux .
So if ya want to bring about " The Year of the Linux Desktop " helping Microsoft turn the screws on unlicensed installs is probably the most productive thing a non-coder can do .
Especially outside the US.I sincerely doubt that Linux will , in the near future , become mainstream like Windows .
Linux is too difficult for the average computer user to use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Exactly right.
Bootleg Windows is the #1 competition to Linux.
So if ya want to bring about "The Year of the Linux Desktop" helping Microsoft turn the screws on unlicensed installs is probably the most productive thing a non-coder can do.
Especially outside the US.I sincerely doubt that Linux will, in the near future, become mainstream like Windows.
Linux is too difficult for the average computer user to use.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989628</id>
	<title>No worries</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265030040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The "patch" is available <a href="http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/5182426/Microsoft\_Windows\_7\_Ultimate\_Retail(Final)\_x86\_and\_x64" title="thepiratebay.org" rel="nofollow">here</a> [thepiratebay.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " patch " is available here [ thepiratebay.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "patch" is available here [thepiratebay.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30993182</id>
	<title>Great!</title>
	<author>ElusiveJoe</author>
	<datestamp>1265112360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is perfect for an Internet addict like me. Can it also not power up a whole day after this mandatory shutdown? I would pay for that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is perfect for an Internet addict like me .
Can it also not power up a whole day after this mandatory shutdown ?
I would pay for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is perfect for an Internet addict like me.
Can it also not power up a whole day after this mandatory shutdown?
I would pay for that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988754</id>
	<title>Ultimate validation of commercial software dev</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265025960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The complete and abject failure that is Linux on the desktop is the ultimate validation of the commercial software development model.</p><p>Writing software is hard. But we knew that 10-15 years ago when Linux on the desktop was just starting to be an open source dream. It was a nice fantasy to cling to that the army of millions of programmers around the world would rise up and crush the outdated commercial software companies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The complete and abject failure that is Linux on the desktop is the ultimate validation of the commercial software development model.Writing software is hard .
But we knew that 10-15 years ago when Linux on the desktop was just starting to be an open source dream .
It was a nice fantasy to cling to that the army of millions of programmers around the world would rise up and crush the outdated commercial software companies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The complete and abject failure that is Linux on the desktop is the ultimate validation of the commercial software development model.Writing software is hard.
But we knew that 10-15 years ago when Linux on the desktop was just starting to be an open source dream.
It was a nice fantasy to cling to that the army of millions of programmers around the world would rise up and crush the outdated commercial software companies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30993192</id>
	<title>Re:It's a good thing.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265112480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why is this being spun as a bad thing?</p></div><p>Cuz Microsoft. You must be new here.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is this being spun as a bad thing ? Cuz Microsoft .
You must be new here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is this being spun as a bad thing?Cuz Microsoft.
You must be new here.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991888</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>BlackHawk-666</author>
	<datestamp>1265049120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a good strategy. I used to upgrade my machine every 2 years or so - usually a piece by piece effort. Parts were above average in quality so were affordable and had a life or maybe 2 years. I got sick of how often I had to have my case open (remember the days of nasty beige cases with razor sharp steel edges, always left a little splash of blood inside those) and also Windows would play funny buggers sometimes over new pieces of hardware.</p><p>I switched to a 3 year, complete replacement, cycle a few years back. In practice though the second last machine I bought would still be plugging away after 6 years happily for most tasks but the latest games. My current system is at the 3 year mark now and still gives excellent performance - even for games. I expect a good 6 years plus out of it.</p><p>My laptop is a Mac Powerbook, the last of the PowerPC models. Unfortunately it was one of those from the bad batch of screens that Apple isn't fixing. I still use it every day, it still does everything it did when I bought it over 5 years ago, and it doesn't feel sluggish.</p><p>Quality gear lasts well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a good strategy .
I used to upgrade my machine every 2 years or so - usually a piece by piece effort .
Parts were above average in quality so were affordable and had a life or maybe 2 years .
I got sick of how often I had to have my case open ( remember the days of nasty beige cases with razor sharp steel edges , always left a little splash of blood inside those ) and also Windows would play funny buggers sometimes over new pieces of hardware.I switched to a 3 year , complete replacement , cycle a few years back .
In practice though the second last machine I bought would still be plugging away after 6 years happily for most tasks but the latest games .
My current system is at the 3 year mark now and still gives excellent performance - even for games .
I expect a good 6 years plus out of it.My laptop is a Mac Powerbook , the last of the PowerPC models .
Unfortunately it was one of those from the bad batch of screens that Apple is n't fixing .
I still use it every day , it still does everything it did when I bought it over 5 years ago , and it does n't feel sluggish.Quality gear lasts well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a good strategy.
I used to upgrade my machine every 2 years or so - usually a piece by piece effort.
Parts were above average in quality so were affordable and had a life or maybe 2 years.
I got sick of how often I had to have my case open (remember the days of nasty beige cases with razor sharp steel edges, always left a little splash of blood inside those) and also Windows would play funny buggers sometimes over new pieces of hardware.I switched to a 3 year, complete replacement, cycle a few years back.
In practice though the second last machine I bought would still be plugging away after 6 years happily for most tasks but the latest games.
My current system is at the 3 year mark now and still gives excellent performance - even for games.
I expect a good 6 years plus out of it.My laptop is a Mac Powerbook, the last of the PowerPC models.
Unfortunately it was one of those from the bad batch of screens that Apple isn't fixing.
I still use it every day, it still does everything it did when I bought it over 5 years ago, and it doesn't feel sluggish.Quality gear lasts well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988750</id>
	<title>Re:Open Source/Linux's Failure To Capitalize</title>
	<author>Anne Thwacks</author>
	<datestamp>1265025960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>Step away from the chair, Steve<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>Step away from the chair , Steve .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Step away from the chair, Steve ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990756</id>
	<title>Re:What's different?</title>
	<author>thePowerOfGrayskull</author>
	<datestamp>1265037660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Whenever I use Windows, it always seems to shut itself down frequently when I'm in the middle of working on something. There's Blue Screens, automagic updates, and random freezes. So, what's different about this? It isn't going to change the uptime very much.</p></div><p>Just a stab in the dark here, but I think we're talking about versions newer than Win98/Win Me.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whenever I use Windows , it always seems to shut itself down frequently when I 'm in the middle of working on something .
There 's Blue Screens , automagic updates , and random freezes .
So , what 's different about this ?
It is n't going to change the uptime very much.Just a stab in the dark here , but I think we 're talking about versions newer than Win98/Win Me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whenever I use Windows, it always seems to shut itself down frequently when I'm in the middle of working on something.
There's Blue Screens, automagic updates, and random freezes.
So, what's different about this?
It isn't going to change the uptime very much.Just a stab in the dark here, but I think we're talking about versions newer than Win98/Win Me.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988616</id>
	<title>Re:..so?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265025540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I installed 5 pirated Win7 Ultimate systems for family and friends.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Only n00bs are still on the RC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I installed 5 pirated Win7 Ultimate systems for family and friends .
: ) Only n00bs are still on the RC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I installed 5 pirated Win7 Ultimate systems for family and friends.
:)Only n00bs are still on the RC.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989250</id>
	<title>Re:obligatory ....</title>
	<author>OutSourcingIsTreason</author>
	<datestamp>1265028120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It'll still be better than Vista.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 'll still be better than Vista .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It'll still be better than Vista.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991488</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7 networking woes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265044560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...apparently the networking issue has been well known since the RC and affects nVidia and Intel chipsets.  My question to him--so what chipsets does that leave unaffected?.</p></div><p>Well that would leave AMD and ATI chipsets unaffected. And as I have had none of those problems with my win 7 box, that must be true.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...apparently the networking issue has been well known since the RC and affects nVidia and Intel chipsets .
My question to him--so what chipsets does that leave unaffected ? .Well that would leave AMD and ATI chipsets unaffected .
And as I have had none of those problems with my win 7 box , that must be true .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...apparently the networking issue has been well known since the RC and affects nVidia and Intel chipsets.
My question to him--so what chipsets does that leave unaffected?.Well that would leave AMD and ATI chipsets unaffected.
And as I have had none of those problems with my win 7 box, that must be true.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989452</id>
	<title>You know</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1265029080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Displaying a dialog box frequently is almost as bad as a shutdown every 2 hours<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Displaying a dialog box frequently is almost as bad as a shutdown every 2 hours : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Displaying a dialog box frequently is almost as bad as a shutdown every 2 hours :)
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989022</id>
	<title>Re:I'm glad there's no bias in the reporting on /.</title>
	<author>Draek</author>
	<datestamp>1265027160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not just "one day", Microsoft explicitly described everything, from the warnings to the automatic shutdown complete with dates for each, on the website you needed to access to register for the RC. And even for the idiots who click OK before reading, they would've known that it was gonna happen based on the same process the Beta went through late last year and all the reports about it.</p><p>There are exactly two kinds of people who will be affected by this: first-year engineering students in the southern hemisphere who are waiting to start classes in March to get their free license through MSDNAA, and illiterate morons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not just " one day " , Microsoft explicitly described everything , from the warnings to the automatic shutdown complete with dates for each , on the website you needed to access to register for the RC .
And even for the idiots who click OK before reading , they would 've known that it was gon na happen based on the same process the Beta went through late last year and all the reports about it.There are exactly two kinds of people who will be affected by this : first-year engineering students in the southern hemisphere who are waiting to start classes in March to get their free license through MSDNAA , and illiterate morons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not just "one day", Microsoft explicitly described everything, from the warnings to the automatic shutdown complete with dates for each, on the website you needed to access to register for the RC.
And even for the idiots who click OK before reading, they would've known that it was gonna happen based on the same process the Beta went through late last year and all the reports about it.There are exactly two kinds of people who will be affected by this: first-year engineering students in the southern hemisphere who are waiting to start classes in March to get their free license through MSDNAA, and illiterate morons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988540</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30994276</id>
	<title>well...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265121540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...in this situation i would feed the bitch with a virus, watch it go down, then go back to the last snapshot and work like before. what's the problem? you can't work with windoze anyways? oh, i see...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...in this situation i would feed the bitch with a virus , watch it go down , then go back to the last snapshot and work like before .
what 's the problem ?
you ca n't work with windoze anyways ?
oh , i see.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...in this situation i would feed the bitch with a virus, watch it go down, then go back to the last snapshot and work like before.
what's the problem?
you can't work with windoze anyways?
oh, i see...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988868</id>
	<title>Re:Open Source/Linux's Failure To Capitalize</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265026380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank you. That's something the FOSS folks (fanatics) don't get. </p><p>Now, all we need is the "Well, why don't you write you own." or the "You can just go and write a version yourself," posts that will get modded up +5.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you .
That 's something the FOSS folks ( fanatics ) do n't get .
Now , all we need is the " Well , why do n't you write you own .
" or the " You can just go and write a version yourself , " posts that will get modded up + 5 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you.
That's something the FOSS folks (fanatics) don't get.
Now, all we need is the "Well, why don't you write you own.
" or the "You can just go and write a version yourself," posts that will get modded up +5.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989770</id>
	<title>What did you expect?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265030880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When you suckle at the Microsoft teat, what do you expect?   You guys love this stuff so much, why don't you just pay for it?  It's not like there aren't better options out there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When you suckle at the Microsoft teat , what do you expect ?
You guys love this stuff so much , why do n't you just pay for it ?
It 's not like there are n't better options out there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you suckle at the Microsoft teat, what do you expect?
You guys love this stuff so much, why don't you just pay for it?
It's not like there aren't better options out there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988440</id>
	<title>As a current user of it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265024880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder how many people who have in currently installed will go out and buy the latest version rather than attempt to bypass the restrictions. It seems like these restrictions are targeted at the type of people who do know how to circumvent these things (that is, people who don't mind beta testing and keep up their computer skills), and that it'll be more of an annoyance than a polite, "Hey the trial is ending soon. Just fyi."</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how many people who have in currently installed will go out and buy the latest version rather than attempt to bypass the restrictions .
It seems like these restrictions are targeted at the type of people who do know how to circumvent these things ( that is , people who do n't mind beta testing and keep up their computer skills ) , and that it 'll be more of an annoyance than a polite , " Hey the trial is ending soon .
Just fyi .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how many people who have in currently installed will go out and buy the latest version rather than attempt to bypass the restrictions.
It seems like these restrictions are targeted at the type of people who do know how to circumvent these things (that is, people who don't mind beta testing and keep up their computer skills), and that it'll be more of an annoyance than a polite, "Hey the trial is ending soon.
Just fyi.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989046</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>russ\_allegro</author>
	<datestamp>1265027220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>XP is not an option since he wants to use the full memory instead of being limited to 3.5Gig.</p></div><p>There is a 64 bit version of Windows XP that supports up to 128 Gig of RAM.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>XP is not an option since he wants to use the full memory instead of being limited to 3.5Gig.There is a 64 bit version of Windows XP that supports up to 128 Gig of RAM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>XP is not an option since he wants to use the full memory instead of being limited to 3.5Gig.There is a 64 bit version of Windows XP that supports up to 128 Gig of RAM.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992686</id>
	<title>Re:What's different?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265104200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I actually got a BSOD a few weeks ago on my XP laptop.  I remember thinking wow, I haven't seen one of these in years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I actually got a BSOD a few weeks ago on my XP laptop .
I remember thinking wow , I have n't seen one of these in years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I actually got a BSOD a few weeks ago on my XP laptop.
I remember thinking wow, I haven't seen one of these in years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990762</id>
	<title>Re:time...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265037720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We didn't "already pay for it". That's just your imaginary viewpoint based on your presupposed biases to justify your deplorable behavior.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We did n't " already pay for it " .
That 's just your imaginary viewpoint based on your presupposed biases to justify your deplorable behavior .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We didn't "already pay for it".
That's just your imaginary viewpoint based on your presupposed biases to justify your deplorable behavior.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990808</id>
	<title>microsoft told people this was going to happen</title>
	<author>atarione</author>
	<datestamp>1265038080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>come on Microsoft told people the rc would do this when it (the RC came out) for Christ sakes.</p><p>buy win7, go back to vista<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/xp or install Linux and shut the fuck up... er hmmm.... I mean exactly that only worded nicer.</p><p>thanx</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>come on Microsoft told people the rc would do this when it ( the RC came out ) for Christ sakes.buy win7 , go back to vista /xp or install Linux and shut the fuck up... er hmmm.... I mean exactly that only worded nicer.thanx</tokentext>
<sentencetext>come on Microsoft told people the rc would do this when it (the RC came out) for Christ sakes.buy win7, go back to vista /xp or install Linux and shut the fuck up... er hmmm.... I mean exactly that only worded nicer.thanx</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989794</id>
	<title>Re:Microsoft getting free ride</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265031060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Really, the free trial version of course is a way of getting a large test populatition to shake down the product, to get the product out and get acceptance in the community, to get the geeks familiar with it ahead of time so when the others in their company, friends and family get hit with the new version they will have a up and ready support community.</p></div><p>And that's a bad thing how? I for one don't want to have someone call me up with a question about Windows 7 and I don't have enough experience to troubleshoot them through their problem. Especially if I'm getting paid to help. And honestly, I doubt I would have even bothered trying Windows 7 if it weren't for the RC. I'm frankly glad they did it. It allowed me to see that Microsoft had finally put out a product worthy of replacing my copy of Windows XP.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>This was not a beta version but probably a shakedown version. So the treatment of the user, especiall un-scheduled shutdowns that could ruin a database, or a file or a directory or someones life work seems like a little on the unfeeling corporate 'we can do anything to you we want', spoiled child, I'm going to take my ball and go home, side.</p></div><p>So wait. You mean suddenly a trial version has to be given an unlimited amount of time to let the user, oh I don't know, use it forever? How is this different from any of the other 90\% or so trial applications. I think the only product I ever used that didn't require me to instantly upgrade when the trial ran out was WinZip.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really , the free trial version of course is a way of getting a large test populatition to shake down the product , to get the product out and get acceptance in the community , to get the geeks familiar with it ahead of time so when the others in their company , friends and family get hit with the new version they will have a up and ready support community.And that 's a bad thing how ?
I for one do n't want to have someone call me up with a question about Windows 7 and I do n't have enough experience to troubleshoot them through their problem .
Especially if I 'm getting paid to help .
And honestly , I doubt I would have even bothered trying Windows 7 if it were n't for the RC .
I 'm frankly glad they did it .
It allowed me to see that Microsoft had finally put out a product worthy of replacing my copy of Windows XP.This was not a beta version but probably a shakedown version .
So the treatment of the user , especiall un-scheduled shutdowns that could ruin a database , or a file or a directory or someones life work seems like a little on the unfeeling corporate 'we can do anything to you we want ' , spoiled child , I 'm going to take my ball and go home , side.So wait .
You mean suddenly a trial version has to be given an unlimited amount of time to let the user , oh I do n't know , use it forever ?
How is this different from any of the other 90 \ % or so trial applications .
I think the only product I ever used that did n't require me to instantly upgrade when the trial ran out was WinZip .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really, the free trial version of course is a way of getting a large test populatition to shake down the product, to get the product out and get acceptance in the community, to get the geeks familiar with it ahead of time so when the others in their company, friends and family get hit with the new version they will have a up and ready support community.And that's a bad thing how?
I for one don't want to have someone call me up with a question about Windows 7 and I don't have enough experience to troubleshoot them through their problem.
Especially if I'm getting paid to help.
And honestly, I doubt I would have even bothered trying Windows 7 if it weren't for the RC.
I'm frankly glad they did it.
It allowed me to see that Microsoft had finally put out a product worthy of replacing my copy of Windows XP.This was not a beta version but probably a shakedown version.
So the treatment of the user, especiall un-scheduled shutdowns that could ruin a database, or a file or a directory or someones life work seems like a little on the unfeeling corporate 'we can do anything to you we want', spoiled child, I'm going to take my ball and go home, side.So wait.
You mean suddenly a trial version has to be given an unlimited amount of time to let the user, oh I don't know, use it forever?
How is this different from any of the other 90\% or so trial applications.
I think the only product I ever used that didn't require me to instantly upgrade when the trial ran out was WinZip.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988450</id>
	<title>time...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265024940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>time to start searching for a pirated version of windows 7... or go back to XP and stop dealing with all the damn 7 issues i have been having<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>time to start searching for a pirated version of windows 7... or go back to XP and stop dealing with all the damn 7 issues i have been having ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>time to start searching for a pirated version of windows 7... or go back to XP and stop dealing with all the damn 7 issues i have been having ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989640</id>
	<title>Re:Microsoft getting free ride</title>
	<author>JoshDD</author>
	<datestamp>1265030100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why would any sane person have a database running on an unlicensed RC? Seems very irresponsible.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would any sane person have a database running on an unlicensed RC ?
Seems very irresponsible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would any sane person have a database running on an unlicensed RC?
Seems very irresponsible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990274</id>
	<title>Re:..so?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265034180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/5327539/Windows\_7\_Ultimate\_7600\_RTM\_x86</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //thepiratebay.org/torrent/5327539/Windows \ _7 \ _Ultimate \ _7600 \ _RTM \ _x86</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/5327539/Windows\_7\_Ultimate\_7600\_RTM\_x86</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30994156</id>
	<title>Re:It's a good thing.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265120880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, not... ALL of us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , not... ALL of us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, not... ALL of us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989394</id>
	<title>Re:What's different?</title>
	<author>Selfbain</author>
	<datestamp>1265028780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think I see your problem.  You're using ME.  Seriously dude, it's been 10 years.  Let it go already.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think I see your problem .
You 're using ME .
Seriously dude , it 's been 10 years .
Let it go already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think I see your problem.
You're using ME.
Seriously dude, it's been 10 years.
Let it go already.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992722</id>
	<title>Re:Oh wow!</title>
	<author>YankDownUnder</author>
	<datestamp>1265104800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm still stuck on playing Descent and Descent2. Might move to Half-Life sometime soon, dunno. Does it do Descent?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm still stuck on playing Descent and Descent2 .
Might move to Half-Life sometime soon , dunno .
Does it do Descent ?
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm still stuck on playing Descent and Descent2.
Might move to Half-Life sometime soon, dunno.
Does it do Descent?
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988540</id>
	<title>I'm glad there's no bias in the reporting on /.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265025240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nice post there: Completely devoid of any bias towards Microsoft/Windows...<br> <br>
Ok, let me turn off my sarcasm-mode first.<br> <br>
So why the negative article about this? All the users knew beforehand that the free trial would end one day: Saying that it's "nagging" the user to pay up, is nothing more than using some fine choice of words to make it look bad on Microsoft.<br>
Seriously, there's lots of other stuff that you can slack MS for, and you have to do it for this?<br>
Also, you got to love the 'it will shutdown without a warning'... but it warns you from the 15th of February...<br> <br>
Next up: Adobe nags the users after one month of using their trial software. Oh, the horror!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice post there : Completely devoid of any bias towards Microsoft/Windows.. . Ok , let me turn off my sarcasm-mode first .
So why the negative article about this ?
All the users knew beforehand that the free trial would end one day : Saying that it 's " nagging " the user to pay up , is nothing more than using some fine choice of words to make it look bad on Microsoft .
Seriously , there 's lots of other stuff that you can slack MS for , and you have to do it for this ?
Also , you got to love the 'it will shutdown without a warning'... but it warns you from the 15th of February.. . Next up : Adobe nags the users after one month of using their trial software .
Oh , the horror !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice post there: Completely devoid of any bias towards Microsoft/Windows... 
Ok, let me turn off my sarcasm-mode first.
So why the negative article about this?
All the users knew beforehand that the free trial would end one day: Saying that it's "nagging" the user to pay up, is nothing more than using some fine choice of words to make it look bad on Microsoft.
Seriously, there's lots of other stuff that you can slack MS for, and you have to do it for this?
Also, you got to love the 'it will shutdown without a warning'... but it warns you from the 15th of February... 
Next up: Adobe nags the users after one month of using their trial software.
Oh, the horror!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990284</id>
	<title>Re:What service....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265034240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which causes you to then run out and buy a retail copy of Windows 7 the next when wireless doesn't work and you realize almost all linux apps are shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which causes you to then run out and buy a retail copy of Windows 7 the next when wireless does n't work and you realize almost all linux apps are shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which causes you to then run out and buy a retail copy of Windows 7 the next when wireless doesn't work and you realize almost all linux apps are shit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988708</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990718</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265037480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly! We were able to use it for free and try it out. I don't see the problem here. In fact, I actually bought a copy after trying it on my laptop. Quite an improvement over Vista! Of course I did get the discounted student copy for $30.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly !
We were able to use it for free and try it out .
I do n't see the problem here .
In fact , I actually bought a copy after trying it on my laptop .
Quite an improvement over Vista !
Of course I did get the discounted student copy for $ 30 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly!
We were able to use it for free and try it out.
I don't see the problem here.
In fact, I actually bought a copy after trying it on my laptop.
Quite an improvement over Vista!
Of course I did get the discounted student copy for $30.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989768</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265030880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pay for your software, and quit your bitching.  It takes vast quantities of money to develop an operating system that will actually work in the real world. You knew going in that it would end.  They told you it may not be upgradeable.  What kind of dip shit puts their life on a system with a pre-release beta version of an operating system, anyway?  You are supposed to be TESTING it, not freeloading.  It should not be a big deal to do a clean install of the final version.  All your stuff should either be on a stable computer with a finalized version of an operating system, or on an external drive.  I'm sorry, but that's the way it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pay for your software , and quit your bitching .
It takes vast quantities of money to develop an operating system that will actually work in the real world .
You knew going in that it would end .
They told you it may not be upgradeable .
What kind of dip shit puts their life on a system with a pre-release beta version of an operating system , anyway ?
You are supposed to be TESTING it , not freeloading .
It should not be a big deal to do a clean install of the final version .
All your stuff should either be on a stable computer with a finalized version of an operating system , or on an external drive .
I 'm sorry , but that 's the way it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pay for your software, and quit your bitching.
It takes vast quantities of money to develop an operating system that will actually work in the real world.
You knew going in that it would end.
They told you it may not be upgradeable.
What kind of dip shit puts their life on a system with a pre-release beta version of an operating system, anyway?
You are supposed to be TESTING it, not freeloading.
It should not be a big deal to do a clean install of the final version.
All your stuff should either be on a stable computer with a finalized version of an operating system, or on an external drive.
I'm sorry, but that's the way it is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992732</id>
	<title>Re:Windows 7 networking woes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265105040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>On a gigabyte network</p> </div><p>If you use nonstandard network, then expect compatibility problems...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>On a gigabyte network If you use nonstandard network , then expect compatibility problems.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On a gigabyte network If you use nonstandard network, then expect compatibility problems...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988666</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_79</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990274
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_84</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992800
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989856
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_69</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_74</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989270
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30994382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_97</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30993342
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990836
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989330
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30996380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_94</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989732
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.31004328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_77</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989340
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989262
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_68</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988902
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_71</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992132
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_67</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30993094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.31004886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_61</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_95</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989236
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_100</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990892
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990366
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991162
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_88</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30993064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991480
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_92</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_66</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_89</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_101</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989936
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_83</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.31001614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30995760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989640
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_98</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990564
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989574
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_75</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30993548
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989762
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_82</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988850
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_78</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30993192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_81</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_99</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_72</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30994274
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_96</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992566
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.31001740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_73</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30994156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_64</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_87</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_80</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_63</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989862
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_65</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988842
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988734
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_102</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_70</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992722
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991488
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_93</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992220
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_86</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_62</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_90</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_85</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989910
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_76</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30994996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.31017468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989022
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989352
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_91</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1933219_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1933219.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988666
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30993064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989764
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989556
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990868
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1933219.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30996380
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989358
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1933219.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990366
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1933219.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988658
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30994996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991576
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1933219.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992040
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988902
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30995760
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1933219.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.31001614
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1933219.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988752
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1933219.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30993094
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.31004886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989268
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989270
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1933219.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988418
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988616
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988632
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989862
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990274
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989762
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991480
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988684
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989262
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990088
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988850
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990094
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1933219.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992026
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1933219.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989040
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989666
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988688
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991888
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991098
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991426
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30994382
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990282
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989046
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989202
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990486
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989352
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989572
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989504
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992436
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.31017468
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989056
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989634
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992220
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992082
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992942
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989236
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988892
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992390
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992566
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992704
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30994156
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30993192
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1933219.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989030
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990762
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990430
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1933219.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989330
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989250
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1933219.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990906
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1933219.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988782
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988754
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988750
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1933219.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988608
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990042
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992686
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.31001740
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989626
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992638
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989936
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992132
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991024
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30991900
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30993342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989394
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1933219.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988776
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1933219.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988540
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30993548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988700
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989022
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988686
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30992046
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990474
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1933219.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.31004328
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1933219.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989574
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989640
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989794
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989610
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989496
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1933219.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988590
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30988708
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30990284
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30994274
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989910
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1933219.30989176
</commentlist>
</conversation>
