<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_30_2355206</id>
	<title>7 of the Best Free Linux Calculators</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1264854960000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"One of the basic utilities supplied with any operating system is a desktop calculator. These are often simple utilities that are perfectly adequate for basic use. They typically include trigonometric functions, logarithms, factorials, parentheses and a memory function. However, the calculators featured in this article are significantly more sophisticated with the ability to process difficult mathematical functions, to plot graphs in 2D and 3D, and much more. Occasionally, the calculator tool provided with an operating system did not engender any confidence. The classic example being the calculator shipped with Windows 3.1 which could not even reliably subtract two numbers. Rest assured, the <a href="http://www.linuxlinks.com/article/20100129194223103/Calculators.html">calculators listed below are of precision quality</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " One of the basic utilities supplied with any operating system is a desktop calculator .
These are often simple utilities that are perfectly adequate for basic use .
They typically include trigonometric functions , logarithms , factorials , parentheses and a memory function .
However , the calculators featured in this article are significantly more sophisticated with the ability to process difficult mathematical functions , to plot graphs in 2D and 3D , and much more .
Occasionally , the calculator tool provided with an operating system did not engender any confidence .
The classic example being the calculator shipped with Windows 3.1 which could not even reliably subtract two numbers .
Rest assured , the calculators listed below are of precision quality .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "One of the basic utilities supplied with any operating system is a desktop calculator.
These are often simple utilities that are perfectly adequate for basic use.
They typically include trigonometric functions, logarithms, factorials, parentheses and a memory function.
However, the calculators featured in this article are significantly more sophisticated with the ability to process difficult mathematical functions, to plot graphs in 2D and 3D, and much more.
Occasionally, the calculator tool provided with an operating system did not engender any confidence.
The classic example being the calculator shipped with Windows 3.1 which could not even reliably subtract two numbers.
Rest assured, the calculators listed below are of precision quality.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968084</id>
	<title>Re:For most people ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264872720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i saw your sig -- i'm curious where you fall on the gender spectrum? i'm a regular<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. user, but i'd rather not post my username, as there are links to lots of places where my real name can be found, and potential employers might look me up on google and be a bit wary of hiring me (sucks, but that's how it goes...)</p><p>email? i'm erinxsquid@gmail.com =)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i saw your sig -- i 'm curious where you fall on the gender spectrum ?
i 'm a regular / .
user , but i 'd rather not post my username , as there are links to lots of places where my real name can be found , and potential employers might look me up on google and be a bit wary of hiring me ( sucks , but that 's how it goes... ) email ?
i 'm erinxsquid @ gmail.com = )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i saw your sig -- i'm curious where you fall on the gender spectrum?
i'm a regular /.
user, but i'd rather not post my username, as there are links to lots of places where my real name can be found, and potential employers might look me up on google and be a bit wary of hiring me (sucks, but that's how it goes...)email?
i'm erinxsquid@gmail.com =)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967584</id>
	<title>Re:Python</title>
	<author>DEmmons</author>
	<datestamp>1264865400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>yeah, i'll admit that python is the only calculator i use anymore, and i have gotten lazy enough to use it for a lot of things any really smart person would be able to compute mentally in a second or two. python is fun and makes sense to me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah , i 'll admit that python is the only calculator i use anymore , and i have gotten lazy enough to use it for a lot of things any really smart person would be able to compute mentally in a second or two .
python is fun and makes sense to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah, i'll admit that python is the only calculator i use anymore, and i have gotten lazy enough to use it for a lot of things any really smart person would be able to compute mentally in a second or two.
python is fun and makes sense to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966942</id>
	<title>Where's DC/BC?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264858980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.computerhope.com/unix/udc.htm" title="computerhope.com">DC</a> [computerhope.com] or <a href="http://www.computerhope.com/unix/ubc.htm" title="computerhope.com">BC</a> [computerhope.com] are more than adequate, are already in 99\% of the distros out there and are <i> chock full</i> of features!</htmltext>
<tokenext>DC [ computerhope.com ] or BC [ computerhope.com ] are more than adequate , are already in 99 \ % of the distros out there and are chock full of features !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DC [computerhope.com] or BC [computerhope.com] are more than adequate, are already in 99\% of the distros out there and are  chock full of features!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967114</id>
	<title>HP42S Simulator</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264860420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My vote is for Thomas Okken's HP42S simulator.  My favorite calculator from university days is resurrected!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My vote is for Thomas Okken 's HP42S simulator .
My favorite calculator from university days is resurrected !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My vote is for Thomas Okken's HP42S simulator.
My favorite calculator from university days is resurrected!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967002</id>
	<title>hp48</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264859580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm amazed they left out the hp48 emulator. It was an amazing calculator, and the emulator does exactly what it it is supposed to do - everything.</p><p>It did everything a calculator is supposed to do, and it was \_almost\_ able to boil my coffee.</p><p>After my 10 years working with programming, this is still the environment i love the most. Actually it is probably the only thing i still know the exact location of at all times.</p><p>I love beeing a geek<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm amazed they left out the hp48 emulator .
It was an amazing calculator , and the emulator does exactly what it it is supposed to do - everything.It did everything a calculator is supposed to do , and it was \ _almost \ _ able to boil my coffee.After my 10 years working with programming , this is still the environment i love the most .
Actually it is probably the only thing i still know the exact location of at all times.I love beeing a geek : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm amazed they left out the hp48 emulator.
It was an amazing calculator, and the emulator does exactly what it it is supposed to do - everything.It did everything a calculator is supposed to do, and it was \_almost\_ able to boil my coffee.After my 10 years working with programming, this is still the environment i love the most.
Actually it is probably the only thing i still know the exact location of at all times.I love beeing a geek :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968256</id>
	<title>Great multi-platform business tape calculator</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264875720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SuperbCalc is great.  Java.  Runs on Windows, Linux, and Mac<br>http://www.mariottini.net/roberto/superbcalc/index.php</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SuperbCalc is great .
Java. Runs on Windows , Linux , and Machttp : //www.mariottini.net/roberto/superbcalc/index.php</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SuperbCalc is great.
Java.  Runs on Windows, Linux, and Machttp://www.mariottini.net/roberto/superbcalc/index.php</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967070</id>
	<title>Python</title>
	<author>petscii</author>
	<datestamp>1264860180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I gave up on all the software calculators a few years back.  Now I use python almost exclusively.  In fact if I could get a Ti-82 form factor that ran nothing but Python I'd be happy.</p><p>This was a natural progression, not something that I forced myself to do.  I really like how you can create the rules of the universe and make your own python modules and re-use them.  I've done this for my DC and AC theory classes.  As well as microprocessor.</p><p>The only downside to this is when I need to give the data to someone else to look at.  Now I can export to XLS via python as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I gave up on all the software calculators a few years back .
Now I use python almost exclusively .
In fact if I could get a Ti-82 form factor that ran nothing but Python I 'd be happy.This was a natural progression , not something that I forced myself to do .
I really like how you can create the rules of the universe and make your own python modules and re-use them .
I 've done this for my DC and AC theory classes .
As well as microprocessor.The only downside to this is when I need to give the data to someone else to look at .
Now I can export to XLS via python as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I gave up on all the software calculators a few years back.
Now I use python almost exclusively.
In fact if I could get a Ti-82 form factor that ran nothing but Python I'd be happy.This was a natural progression, not something that I forced myself to do.
I really like how you can create the rules of the universe and make your own python modules and re-use them.
I've done this for my DC and AC theory classes.
As well as microprocessor.The only downside to this is when I need to give the data to someone else to look at.
Now I can export to XLS via python as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30970056</id>
	<title>Not very thorough</title>
	<author>QuietLagoon</author>
	<datestamp>1264950420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It looks like the review was little more than a feature checklist, with little regard to precision and accuracy of the calculators.   Where in the review were the number of <a href="http://www.rskey.org/~mwsebastian/miscprj/guard\_digits.htm" title="rskey.org">guard digits</a> [rskey.org] checked?   Answer: nowhere.<p>.</p><p>

Move on, there is little to see in TFA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks like the review was little more than a feature checklist , with little regard to precision and accuracy of the calculators .
Where in the review were the number of guard digits [ rskey.org ] checked ?
Answer : nowhere. . Move on , there is little to see in TFA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks like the review was little more than a feature checklist, with little regard to precision and accuracy of the calculators.
Where in the review were the number of guard digits [rskey.org] checked?
Answer: nowhere..

Move on, there is little to see in TFA.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968818</id>
	<title>Re:It's all about the tape!</title>
	<author>Tzarius</author>
	<datestamp>1264929600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've found Console Calculator to be quite handy in the office environment, although it is (currently) windows only. The "virtual tape", minimize-to-tray, responsiveness, and absence of the space-devouring visual number pad help are great when you're working on another business app. I will be trying gtapecalc though!<br>
<a href="http://www.zoesoft.com/console-calculator/" title="zoesoft.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.zoesoft.com/console-calculator/</a> [zoesoft.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've found Console Calculator to be quite handy in the office environment , although it is ( currently ) windows only .
The " virtual tape " , minimize-to-tray , responsiveness , and absence of the space-devouring visual number pad help are great when you 're working on another business app .
I will be trying gtapecalc though !
http : //www.zoesoft.com/console-calculator/ [ zoesoft.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've found Console Calculator to be quite handy in the office environment, although it is (currently) windows only.
The "virtual tape", minimize-to-tray, responsiveness, and absence of the space-devouring visual number pad help are great when you're working on another business app.
I will be trying gtapecalc though!
http://www.zoesoft.com/console-calculator/ [zoesoft.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967374</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30970954</id>
	<title>Re:Arbitrary precision math libraries</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264958760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, what did you try? gmp and mpfr are some of the better maintained.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , what did you try ?
gmp and mpfr are some of the better maintained .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, what did you try?
gmp and mpfr are some of the better maintained.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30971732</id>
	<title>Re:Christ</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1264964580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Indeed, I could holler over my cubicle wall, "Remember Code Red?" or "Just like Nimda" and four people will join in a collective groan of agreement.</i></p><p>Yeah, remember when we were hit by these viruses using flaws that had been patched months before because our IT department is full of incompetent morons? Remember how a simple firewall would have completely neutralized the threat to our SQL servers?</p><p>Seriously, that says nothing about Microsoft. It does say something about your IT department.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed , I could holler over my cubicle wall , " Remember Code Red ?
" or " Just like Nimda " and four people will join in a collective groan of agreement.Yeah , remember when we were hit by these viruses using flaws that had been patched months before because our IT department is full of incompetent morons ?
Remember how a simple firewall would have completely neutralized the threat to our SQL servers ? Seriously , that says nothing about Microsoft .
It does say something about your IT department .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed, I could holler over my cubicle wall, "Remember Code Red?
" or "Just like Nimda" and four people will join in a collective groan of agreement.Yeah, remember when we were hit by these viruses using flaws that had been patched months before because our IT department is full of incompetent morons?
Remember how a simple firewall would have completely neutralized the threat to our SQL servers?Seriously, that says nothing about Microsoft.
It does say something about your IT department.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966932</id>
	<title>For most people ...</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1264858860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>anything more complicated than adding a few numbers, it's easier to open a spreadsheet than to learn how any particular calculator functions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>anything more complicated than adding a few numbers , it 's easier to open a spreadsheet than to learn how any particular calculator functions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>anything more complicated than adding a few numbers, it's easier to open a spreadsheet than to learn how any particular calculator functions.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968886</id>
	<title>Plain, simple RPN command line calculator</title>
	<author>hannorein</author>
	<datestamp>1264930740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm using kalc (http://kalc.sourceforge.net/). It's a pleasure to use. Plain and simple and fast. It's not being developed anymore but the latest stable version is almost perfect<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...

Hanno</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm using kalc ( http : //kalc.sourceforge.net/ ) .
It 's a pleasure to use .
Plain and simple and fast .
It 's not being developed anymore but the latest stable version is almost perfect .. . Hanno</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm using kalc (http://kalc.sourceforge.net/).
It's a pleasure to use.
Plain and simple and fast.
It's not being developed anymore but the latest stable version is almost perfect ...

Hanno</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967632</id>
	<title>Re:For most people ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264866240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This article just proved I am addicted to the internet. I'm reading about linux calculators and I don't even run linux.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This article just proved I am addicted to the internet .
I 'm reading about linux calculators and I do n't even run linux .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This article just proved I am addicted to the internet.
I'm reading about linux calculators and I don't even run linux.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969666</id>
	<title>Re:Sage?</title>
	<author>phatsphere</author>
	<datestamp>1264945320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>+1 to Sage <a href="http://www.sagemath.org/" title="sagemath.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.sagemath.org/</a> [sagemath.org] from me, too. You are always limited by these tiny utilites and you are not able to program with them easily like with Sage - since it is based on Python.</htmltext>
<tokenext>+ 1 to Sage http : //www.sagemath.org/ [ sagemath.org ] from me , too .
You are always limited by these tiny utilites and you are not able to program with them easily like with Sage - since it is based on Python .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>+1 to Sage http://www.sagemath.org/ [sagemath.org] from me, too.
You are always limited by these tiny utilites and you are not able to program with them easily like with Sage - since it is based on Python.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967322</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967968</id>
	<title>Re:How about a symbolic calculator?</title>
	<author>friedmud</author>
	<datestamp>1264871160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Try using actual Maple instead of using it through Matlab.  It has a pretty awesome GUI interface that allows you to enter equations either visually (like put down an integral symbol and fill out the fields) or using the command syntax...</p><p>
&nbsp; But either way it beautifully renders your math so it looks just like it does on paper.  This is the reason I always reach for Maple over any other calculator.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Try using actual Maple instead of using it through Matlab .
It has a pretty awesome GUI interface that allows you to enter equations either visually ( like put down an integral symbol and fill out the fields ) or using the command syntax.. .   But either way it beautifully renders your math so it looks just like it does on paper .
This is the reason I always reach for Maple over any other calculator .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try using actual Maple instead of using it through Matlab.
It has a pretty awesome GUI interface that allows you to enter equations either visually (like put down an integral symbol and fill out the fields) or using the command syntax...
  But either way it beautifully renders your math so it looks just like it does on paper.
This is the reason I always reach for Maple over any other calculator.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967420</id>
	<title>Re:How about a symbolic calculator?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264863300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A pricey but uber powerful version of this is mathcad, it runs on the same base as maple but has an excellent interface.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A pricey but uber powerful version of this is mathcad , it runs on the same base as maple but has an excellent interface .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A pricey but uber powerful version of this is mathcad, it runs on the same base as maple but has an excellent interface.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969642</id>
	<title>Some</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264944900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>~$ cat bin/=<br>#!/bin/bash<br>echo "scale=5; $1" | bc</p><p>or</p><p>octave</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>~ $ cat bin/ = # ! /bin/bashecho " scale = 5 ; $ 1 " | bcoroctave</tokentext>
<sentencetext>~$ cat bin/=#!/bin/bashecho "scale=5; $1" | bcoroctave</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968416</id>
	<title>Spam article</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1264878060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
The linked page has 24 lines of useful text.  It also has 10 ads, and at least 50 links of marginal value.
</p><p>
In other words, it's spam.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The linked page has 24 lines of useful text .
It also has 10 ads , and at least 50 links of marginal value .
In other words , it 's spam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
The linked page has 24 lines of useful text.
It also has 10 ads, and at least 50 links of marginal value.
In other words, it's spam.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30978400</id>
	<title>Texas Instruments TI-89 Titanium - Compatability?</title>
	<author>dogzdik</author>
	<datestamp>1265015760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are there are any emulators and or interface and or "WINE" style programs that can interface with / run the said calculator or it's software?

Anything else is just ungay.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are there are any emulators and or interface and or " WINE " style programs that can interface with / run the said calculator or it 's software ?
Anything else is just ungay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are there are any emulators and or interface and or "WINE" style programs that can interface with / run the said calculator or it's software?
Anything else is just ungay.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969272</id>
	<title>Re:Google</title>
	<author>Haeleth</author>
	<datestamp>1264939740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But only for a limited range of equations.  For example, it can only calculate factorials up to 170! -- after that it stops recognising them and just does a normal search instead.</p><p>And, yes, there are plenty of cases where one might want to know the factorial of a larger number.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But only for a limited range of equations .
For example , it can only calculate factorials up to 170 !
-- after that it stops recognising them and just does a normal search instead.And , yes , there are plenty of cases where one might want to know the factorial of a larger number .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But only for a limited range of equations.
For example, it can only calculate factorials up to 170!
-- after that it stops recognising them and just does a normal search instead.And, yes, there are plenty of cases where one might want to know the factorial of a larger number.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969632</id>
	<title>Re:How about a construction calculator?</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1264944720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It has some notion of the units present on a tape measure, and functions helpful for a builder:</p><p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0008GO6A6/ref=asc\_df\_B0008GO6A61018580?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER" title="amazon.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0008GO6A6/ref=asc\_df\_B0008GO6A61018580?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER</a> [amazon.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It has some notion of the units present on a tape measure , and functions helpful for a builder : http : //www.amazon.com/dp/B0008GO6A6/ref = asc \ _df \ _B0008GO6A61018580 ? smid = ATVPDKIKX0DER [ amazon.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has some notion of the units present on a tape measure, and functions helpful for a builder:http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0008GO6A6/ref=asc\_df\_B0008GO6A61018580?smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER [amazon.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966964</id>
	<title>digg</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264859220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>why no digg button?  Is it because they already posted this story and have that dupe thing figured out?</htmltext>
<tokenext>why no digg button ?
Is it because they already posted this story and have that dupe thing figured out ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why no digg button?
Is it because they already posted this story and have that dupe thing figured out?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968082</id>
	<title>TI-85?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264872720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No TI-85 emulators?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No TI-85 emulators ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No TI-85 emulators?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30970442</id>
	<title>Re:For most people ...</title>
	<author>The\_Wilschon</author>
	<datestamp>1264954200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You might also prefer LabView, for visual arrangement of calculation and even programming flow.  I didn't particularly like it for some specific technical reasons, but I can see where someone as visually oriented as you say you are might really benefit from it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You might also prefer LabView , for visual arrangement of calculation and even programming flow .
I did n't particularly like it for some specific technical reasons , but I can see where someone as visually oriented as you say you are might really benefit from it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You might also prefer LabView, for visual arrangement of calculation and even programming flow.
I didn't particularly like it for some specific technical reasons, but I can see where someone as visually oriented as you say you are might really benefit from it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046</id>
	<title>Christ</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264859940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Half the people on this site probably weren't even alive when Windows 3.1 came out... could you guys give the pointless Microsoft bashing a rest? Just once, ever?</p><p>Could we maybe just get over it instead of posting another "LOLZ Microsoft BOB is bad guyz!!"</p><p>This shit pisses me off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Half the people on this site probably were n't even alive when Windows 3.1 came out... could you guys give the pointless Microsoft bashing a rest ?
Just once , ever ? Could we maybe just get over it instead of posting another " LOLZ Microsoft BOB is bad guyz ! !
" This shit pisses me off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Half the people on this site probably weren't even alive when Windows 3.1 came out... could you guys give the pointless Microsoft bashing a rest?
Just once, ever?Could we maybe just get over it instead of posting another "LOLZ Microsoft BOB is bad guyz!!
"This shit pisses me off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967604</id>
	<title>Re:Emacs Calc</title>
	<author>siride</author>
	<datestamp>1264865820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's always true.  It's not infinite precision.  There's no such thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's always true .
It 's not infinite precision .
There 's no such thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's always true.
It's not infinite precision.
There's no such thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966930</id>
	<title>Stick with the classics</title>
	<author>Denis Lemire</author>
	<datestamp>1264858860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'dc' is the only calculator you'll ever need!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'dc ' is the only calculator you 'll ever need !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'dc' is the only calculator you'll ever need!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969688</id>
	<title>One stop shopping: R</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264945560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.r-project.org/" title="r-project.org" rel="nofollow">R</a> [r-project.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>R [ r-project.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>R [r-project.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968534</id>
	<title>grpn is my favorite</title>
	<author>calidoscope</author>
	<datestamp>1264879980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Obviously an rpn calculator, pretty much the basic trig and exponential (in some ways less than an HP-45 - my first calculator). On the other hand, it does have a deep stack limited by screen space, complex numbers, some matrix ops and an instruction called "rip" - resistors in parallel, which also works with complex numbers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously an rpn calculator , pretty much the basic trig and exponential ( in some ways less than an HP-45 - my first calculator ) .
On the other hand , it does have a deep stack limited by screen space , complex numbers , some matrix ops and an instruction called " rip " - resistors in parallel , which also works with complex numbers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously an rpn calculator, pretty much the basic trig and exponential (in some ways less than an HP-45 - my first calculator).
On the other hand, it does have a deep stack limited by screen space, complex numbers, some matrix ops and an instruction called "rip" - resistors in parallel, which also works with complex numbers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968650</id>
	<title>LOL!</title>
	<author>Joce640k</author>
	<datestamp>1264968900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I checked some of them out...</p><p>Most were considerably *worse* than Windows' built-in calculator - which I didn't think was possible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I checked some of them out...Most were considerably * worse * than Windows ' built-in calculator - which I did n't think was possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I checked some of them out...Most were considerably *worse* than Windows' built-in calculator - which I didn't think was possible.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966928</id>
	<title>Missing</title>
	<author>bcmm</author>
	<datestamp>1264858800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <tt>$ dc</tt></p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>$ dc</tokentext>
<sentencetext> $ dc 
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967354</id>
	<title>Sage?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264862640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Try Sage (sagemath.org). It can be finicky to install, but is a great CAS! It also will integrate with Octave, Maxima, R, GAP, Python, and several other programs. The typesetting is great and the graphs look good too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Try Sage ( sagemath.org ) .
It can be finicky to install , but is a great CAS !
It also will integrate with Octave , Maxima , R , GAP , Python , and several other programs .
The typesetting is great and the graphs look good too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try Sage (sagemath.org).
It can be finicky to install, but is a great CAS!
It also will integrate with Octave, Maxima, R, GAP, Python, and several other programs.
The typesetting is great and the graphs look good too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966904</id>
	<title>They left out RPL/2</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264858680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>While technically not a "calculator", unless you run it in interactive mode, <a href="http://www.rpl2.net/index.php" title="rpl2.net">RPL/2</a> [rpl2.net] is one of the oldest
and most mature of any HP28/48/49/50 style <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RPL\_(programming\_language)" title="wikipedia.org">UserRPL</a> [wikipedia.org] interpreters.<br> <br>
What makes it so awesome is its ability to interface with the OS via POSIX compliant commands -- it's almost like using your HP48 as a scripting
tool for Unix.Too bad they didn't mention it.
<br> <br>
jdb2</htmltext>
<tokenext>While technically not a " calculator " , unless you run it in interactive mode , RPL/2 [ rpl2.net ] is one of the oldest and most mature of any HP28/48/49/50 style UserRPL [ wikipedia.org ] interpreters .
What makes it so awesome is its ability to interface with the OS via POSIX compliant commands -- it 's almost like using your HP48 as a scripting tool for Unix.Too bad they did n't mention it .
jdb2</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While technically not a "calculator", unless you run it in interactive mode, RPL/2 [rpl2.net] is one of the oldest
and most mature of any HP28/48/49/50 style UserRPL [wikipedia.org] interpreters.
What makes it so awesome is its ability to interface with the OS via POSIX compliant commands -- it's almost like using your HP48 as a scripting
tool for Unix.Too bad they didn't mention it.
jdb2</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967368</id>
	<title>How about a construction calculator?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264862760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone know of such a thing on linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone know of such a thing on linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone know of such a thing on linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967896</id>
	<title>I think we have a winner....</title>
	<author>voss</author>
	<datestamp>1264870200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for the nerdiest linux topic on slashdot for 2010.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for the nerdiest linux topic on slashdot for 2010 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for the nerdiest linux topic on slashdot for 2010.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967068</id>
	<title>Calculators: useless; Languages: useful</title>
	<author>MacTO</author>
	<datestamp>1264860180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Calculators are useful as handheld devices, but you may as well use an interpreted programming language if you're on a computer.  That is particularly true if you consider yourself a Unix user.  So my favourites are:</p><p>bc: fast to use, arbitrary precision, and it seems to be universally available<br>awk: faster to use when you are performing the same calculation many times over<br>python: has a richer library of mathematics functions</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Calculators are useful as handheld devices , but you may as well use an interpreted programming language if you 're on a computer .
That is particularly true if you consider yourself a Unix user .
So my favourites are : bc : fast to use , arbitrary precision , and it seems to be universally availableawk : faster to use when you are performing the same calculation many times overpython : has a richer library of mathematics functions</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Calculators are useful as handheld devices, but you may as well use an interpreted programming language if you're on a computer.
That is particularly true if you consider yourself a Unix user.
So my favourites are:bc: fast to use, arbitrary precision, and it seems to be universally availableawk: faster to use when you are performing the same calculation many times overpython: has a richer library of mathematics functions</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967626</id>
	<title>Python+Numpy+Scipy+Matplotlib</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264866180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What more could you need?

(Acceptable answer: <a href="http://www.sagemath.org/" title="sagemath.org" rel="nofollow">Sage?</a> [sagemath.org])</htmltext>
<tokenext>What more could you need ?
( Acceptable answer : Sage ?
[ sagemath.org ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What more could you need?
(Acceptable answer: Sage?
[sagemath.org])</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968112</id>
	<title>perl -e</title>
	<author>rrohbeck</author>
	<datestamp>1264873200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously. OK, sometimes the expression becomes a few lines long and at some point I'll write it to a file and fire up vim, but that happens rarely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously .
OK , sometimes the expression becomes a few lines long and at some point I 'll write it to a file and fire up vim , but that happens rarely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.
OK, sometimes the expression becomes a few lines long and at some point I'll write it to a file and fire up vim, but that happens rarely.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968208</id>
	<title>Try this one!</title>
	<author>anwyn</author>
	<datestamp>1264874640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This <a href="http://www.antiquark.com/sliderule/sim/n4es/virtual-n4es.html" title="antiquark.com">one</a> [antiquark.com] is so advanced most people don't know how to use it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This one [ antiquark.com ] is so advanced most people do n't know how to use it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This one [antiquark.com] is so advanced most people don't know how to use it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967110</id>
	<title>If you're a mac user</title>
	<author>moosesocks</author>
	<datestamp>1264860420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slightly OT, but if you're a Mac user, I highly recommend the <a href="http://donkeyentertainment.com/software/" title="donkeyentertainment.com">PEMDAS Widget</a> [donkeyentertainment.com], which is just that tiny bit more powerful than a typical desktop calculator to make it 100x as useful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slightly OT , but if you 're a Mac user , I highly recommend the PEMDAS Widget [ donkeyentertainment.com ] , which is just that tiny bit more powerful than a typical desktop calculator to make it 100x as useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slightly OT, but if you're a Mac user, I highly recommend the PEMDAS Widget [donkeyentertainment.com], which is just that tiny bit more powerful than a typical desktop calculator to make it 100x as useful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967970</id>
	<title>Re:Christ</title>
	<author>digitalhermit</author>
	<datestamp>1264871160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>could you guys give the pointless Microsoft bashing a rest? Just once, ever?</i></p><p>No. Users of Microsoft product have a shared experience. It's no different from that knowing wink when I talk to other Florida residents about Hurricane Andrew. Or comisserate with a Cubs fan. Or talk about the most recent inanities of the most recent PHB with another cubicle dweller.  Windows is our shared hell, our Inferno. We could no more stop talking about its pains than we could  stop complaining about taxes or the latest government screwup. Indeed, I could holler over my cubicle wall, "Remember Code Red?" or "Just like Nimda" and four people will join in a collective groan of agreement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>could you guys give the pointless Microsoft bashing a rest ?
Just once , ever ? No .
Users of Microsoft product have a shared experience .
It 's no different from that knowing wink when I talk to other Florida residents about Hurricane Andrew .
Or comisserate with a Cubs fan .
Or talk about the most recent inanities of the most recent PHB with another cubicle dweller .
Windows is our shared hell , our Inferno .
We could no more stop talking about its pains than we could stop complaining about taxes or the latest government screwup .
Indeed , I could holler over my cubicle wall , " Remember Code Red ?
" or " Just like Nimda " and four people will join in a collective groan of agreement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>could you guys give the pointless Microsoft bashing a rest?
Just once, ever?No.
Users of Microsoft product have a shared experience.
It's no different from that knowing wink when I talk to other Florida residents about Hurricane Andrew.
Or comisserate with a Cubs fan.
Or talk about the most recent inanities of the most recent PHB with another cubicle dweller.
Windows is our shared hell, our Inferno.
We could no more stop talking about its pains than we could  stop complaining about taxes or the latest government screwup.
Indeed, I could holler over my cubicle wall, "Remember Code Red?
" or "Just like Nimda" and four people will join in a collective groan of agreement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968506</id>
	<title>My faith in numbers.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264879620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A put down of the MS calculator and not a ONE even asks how are all the calculators mentioned vetted?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A put down of the MS calculator and not a ONE even asks how are all the calculators mentioned vetted ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A put down of the MS calculator and not a ONE even asks how are all the calculators mentioned vetted?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967124</id>
	<title>Use Google</title>
	<author>chipschap</author>
	<datestamp>1264860540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google's quick calculator does a lot more than I ever realized before I started using it for quick one-liners.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google 's quick calculator does a lot more than I ever realized before I started using it for quick one-liners .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google's quick calculator does a lot more than I ever realized before I started using it for quick one-liners.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969022</id>
	<title>Re:How about a symbolic calculator?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264933860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I still use the TI89 that I've had for almost 10 years, because to this day I have yet to find a desktop symbolic calculator that satisfies me.</p></div><p>http://lpg.ticalc.org/prj\_tiemu/</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I still use the TI89 that I 've had for almost 10 years , because to this day I have yet to find a desktop symbolic calculator that satisfies me.http : //lpg.ticalc.org/prj \ _tiemu/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still use the TI89 that I've had for almost 10 years, because to this day I have yet to find a desktop symbolic calculator that satisfies me.http://lpg.ticalc.org/prj\_tiemu/
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968192</id>
	<title>Re:How about a symbolic calculator?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264874460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's called Mathematica. Kind of curious that you missed it when you mentioned the other two "big" math programs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's called Mathematica .
Kind of curious that you missed it when you mentioned the other two " big " math programs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's called Mathematica.
Kind of curious that you missed it when you mentioned the other two "big" math programs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967698</id>
	<title>Qalculate!!</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1264867260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nothing. I repeat: <em>Nothing</em> beats Qalculate!! (It&rsquo;s so hot, Firefox&rsquo;s spell checker suggests &ldquo;Ejaculate&rdquo;!)<br>If you go any bigger, you &ldquo;explode&rdquo; into a math suite, and not a calculator anymore.</p><p>Ignore the silly screenshot with the &ldquo;button&rdquo; view. Most calculator software tries to imitate a physical calculator, with buttons and LED displays. Which is just an EPIC FAILure in UI design. This screenshot shows a real usage example of Qalculate!:<br><a href="http://navid.radiantempire.com/pub/Haskell-Synth-Entwicklung.png" title="radiantempire.com">http://navid.radiantempire.com/pub/Haskell-Synth-Entwicklung.png</a> [radiantempire.com] (The BG contains a Haskell programming editor and a sound analyzer. Yes, I&rsquo;m still a noob at this.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nothing .
I repeat : Nothing beats Qalculate ! !
( It    s so hot , Firefox    s spell checker suggests    Ejaculate    !
) If you go any bigger , you    explode    into a math suite , and not a calculator anymore.Ignore the silly screenshot with the    button    view .
Most calculator software tries to imitate a physical calculator , with buttons and LED displays .
Which is just an EPIC FAILure in UI design .
This screenshot shows a real usage example of Qalculate !
: http : //navid.radiantempire.com/pub/Haskell-Synth-Entwicklung.png [ radiantempire.com ] ( The BG contains a Haskell programming editor and a sound analyzer .
Yes , I    m still a noob at this .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nothing.
I repeat: Nothing beats Qalculate!!
(It’s so hot, Firefox’s spell checker suggests “Ejaculate”!
)If you go any bigger, you “explode” into a math suite, and not a calculator anymore.Ignore the silly screenshot with the “button” view.
Most calculator software tries to imitate a physical calculator, with buttons and LED displays.
Which is just an EPIC FAILure in UI design.
This screenshot shows a real usage example of Qalculate!
:http://navid.radiantempire.com/pub/Haskell-Synth-Entwicklung.png [radiantempire.com] (The BG contains a Haskell programming editor and a sound analyzer.
Yes, I’m still a noob at this.
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967404</id>
	<title>Re:hp48</title>
	<author>dasqua</author>
	<datestamp>1264863060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My hp48gx has been my calculator of choice ever since I first got it. Still works fine.</p><p>The benefit of this:<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; quicker to use, 1 second startup<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; portable, its a physical device<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; easily upload results to the PC when needed</p><p>I also use python/SAGE...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My hp48gx has been my calculator of choice ever since I first got it .
Still works fine.The benefit of this :     quicker to use , 1 second startup     portable , its a physical device     easily upload results to the PC when neededI also use python/SAGE.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My hp48gx has been my calculator of choice ever since I first got it.
Still works fine.The benefit of this:
    quicker to use, 1 second startup
    portable, its a physical device
    easily upload results to the PC when neededI also use python/SAGE...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969662</id>
	<title>Re:For most people ...</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1264945320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Google Apps spreadsheet does all of the calculation on the client.  That means it is using JavaScript which requires all numbers to have the same range and precision as 64-bit IEEE floating point numbers.  While most spreadsheets have various ways of representing numbers, including binary coded decimal and arbitrary-precision, everything in Google's one is a double.  If you use it for anything important, you are an idiot, but it's quite handy for simple things.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Google Apps spreadsheet does all of the calculation on the client .
That means it is using JavaScript which requires all numbers to have the same range and precision as 64-bit IEEE floating point numbers .
While most spreadsheets have various ways of representing numbers , including binary coded decimal and arbitrary-precision , everything in Google 's one is a double .
If you use it for anything important , you are an idiot , but it 's quite handy for simple things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Google Apps spreadsheet does all of the calculation on the client.
That means it is using JavaScript which requires all numbers to have the same range and precision as 64-bit IEEE floating point numbers.
While most spreadsheets have various ways of representing numbers, including binary coded decimal and arbitrary-precision, everything in Google's one is a double.
If you use it for anything important, you are an idiot, but it's quite handy for simple things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967936</id>
	<title>Linux Calendars</title>
	<author>FatherDale</author>
	<datestamp>1264870800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sadly, I mis-read the headline and came here expecting a photo of Miss Ubuntu February and Miss RedHat April....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly , I mis-read the headline and came here expecting a photo of Miss Ubuntu February and Miss RedHat April... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly, I mis-read the headline and came here expecting a photo of Miss Ubuntu February and Miss RedHat April....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967454</id>
	<title>orpie</title>
	<author>cynyr</author>
	<datestamp>1264863780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i found orpie <a href="http://pessimization.com/software/orpie/" title="pessimization.com" rel="nofollow">http://pessimization.com/software/orpie/</a> [pessimization.com] to be very useful during intro to AC circuits back at university. it handles input in both polar and rectangular notation and will output the answer in either. a fast RPN calculator. The only thing i haven't found is a calculator to do symbolic algebra, as in solve things in terms of sqrt(2)'s and such for me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>i found orpie http : //pessimization.com/software/orpie/ [ pessimization.com ] to be very useful during intro to AC circuits back at university .
it handles input in both polar and rectangular notation and will output the answer in either .
a fast RPN calculator .
The only thing i have n't found is a calculator to do symbolic algebra , as in solve things in terms of sqrt ( 2 ) 's and such for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i found orpie http://pessimization.com/software/orpie/ [pessimization.com] to be very useful during intro to AC circuits back at university.
it handles input in both polar and rectangular notation and will output the answer in either.
a fast RPN calculator.
The only thing i haven't found is a calculator to do symbolic algebra, as in solve things in terms of sqrt(2)'s and such for me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967086</id>
	<title>Emacs Calc</title>
	<author>macshit</author>
	<datestamp>1264860240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Emacs Calc, i.e. "M-x calc" in Emacs is by far the best calculator I've ever seen.
</p><p>Here's the blurb from the manual:</p><blockquote><div><p>"Calc" is an advanced calculator and mathematical tool that runs as part of the GNU Emacs environment.  Very roughly based on the HP-28/48 series of calculators, its many features include:
</p><ul>
<li>Choice of algebraic or RPN (stack-based) entry of calculations.</li>
<li>Arbitrary precision integers and floating-point numbers.</li>
<li>Arithmetic on rational numbers, complex numbers (rectangular and polar), error forms with standard deviations, open and closed intervals, vectors and matrices, dates and times, infinities, sets, quantities with units, and algebraic formulas.</li>
<li>Mathematical operations such as logarithms and trigonometric functions.</li>
<li>Programmer's features (bitwise operations, non-decimal numbers).</li>
<li>Financial functions such as future value and internal rate of return.</li>
<li>Number theoretical features such as prime factorization and arithmetic modulo M for any M.</li>
<li>Algebraic manipulation features, including symbolic calculus.</li>
<li>Moving data to and from regular editing buffers.</li>
<li>Embedded mode for manipulating Calc formulas and data directly inside any editing buffer.</li>
<li>Graphics using GNUPLOT, a versatile (and free) plotting program.</li>
<li>Easy programming using keyboard macros, algebraic formulas, algebraic rewrite rules, or extended Emacs Lisp.</li>
</ul></div> </blockquote><p>That list gives you a bit of an idea, but doesn't really capture how just darn cool Calc is; it just seems to do <em>everything</em>.... (The things I particularly value are the vector/matrix operations and the symbolic manipulation operators.)
</p><p>It's (default) model is HP-style RPN, except of course with a much larger visible stack, and multi-level undo.
</p><p>[You have to be careful tho because recent releases of Emacs come with <em>two</em> calculators -- a "simple" one, which you get with "M-x calculator", and the super incredible one you get with "M-x calc"... (yes it's kind of silly, but as usual with Emacs, there are historical reasons...]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Emacs Calc , i.e .
" M-x calc " in Emacs is by far the best calculator I 've ever seen .
Here 's the blurb from the manual : " Calc " is an advanced calculator and mathematical tool that runs as part of the GNU Emacs environment .
Very roughly based on the HP-28/48 series of calculators , its many features include : Choice of algebraic or RPN ( stack-based ) entry of calculations .
Arbitrary precision integers and floating-point numbers .
Arithmetic on rational numbers , complex numbers ( rectangular and polar ) , error forms with standard deviations , open and closed intervals , vectors and matrices , dates and times , infinities , sets , quantities with units , and algebraic formulas .
Mathematical operations such as logarithms and trigonometric functions .
Programmer 's features ( bitwise operations , non-decimal numbers ) .
Financial functions such as future value and internal rate of return .
Number theoretical features such as prime factorization and arithmetic modulo M for any M . Algebraic manipulation features , including symbolic calculus .
Moving data to and from regular editing buffers .
Embedded mode for manipulating Calc formulas and data directly inside any editing buffer .
Graphics using GNUPLOT , a versatile ( and free ) plotting program .
Easy programming using keyboard macros , algebraic formulas , algebraic rewrite rules , or extended Emacs Lisp .
That list gives you a bit of an idea , but does n't really capture how just darn cool Calc is ; it just seems to do everything.... ( The things I particularly value are the vector/matrix operations and the symbolic manipulation operators .
) It 's ( default ) model is HP-style RPN , except of course with a much larger visible stack , and multi-level undo .
[ You have to be careful tho because recent releases of Emacs come with two calculators -- a " simple " one , which you get with " M-x calculator " , and the super incredible one you get with " M-x calc " ... ( yes it 's kind of silly , but as usual with Emacs , there are historical reasons... ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Emacs Calc, i.e.
"M-x calc" in Emacs is by far the best calculator I've ever seen.
Here's the blurb from the manual:"Calc" is an advanced calculator and mathematical tool that runs as part of the GNU Emacs environment.
Very roughly based on the HP-28/48 series of calculators, its many features include:

Choice of algebraic or RPN (stack-based) entry of calculations.
Arbitrary precision integers and floating-point numbers.
Arithmetic on rational numbers, complex numbers (rectangular and polar), error forms with standard deviations, open and closed intervals, vectors and matrices, dates and times, infinities, sets, quantities with units, and algebraic formulas.
Mathematical operations such as logarithms and trigonometric functions.
Programmer's features (bitwise operations, non-decimal numbers).
Financial functions such as future value and internal rate of return.
Number theoretical features such as prime factorization and arithmetic modulo M for any M.
Algebraic manipulation features, including symbolic calculus.
Moving data to and from regular editing buffers.
Embedded mode for manipulating Calc formulas and data directly inside any editing buffer.
Graphics using GNUPLOT, a versatile (and free) plotting program.
Easy programming using keyboard macros, algebraic formulas, algebraic rewrite rules, or extended Emacs Lisp.
That list gives you a bit of an idea, but doesn't really capture how just darn cool Calc is; it just seems to do everything.... (The things I particularly value are the vector/matrix operations and the symbolic manipulation operators.
)
It's (default) model is HP-style RPN, except of course with a much larger visible stack, and multi-level undo.
[You have to be careful tho because recent releases of Emacs come with two calculators -- a "simple" one, which you get with "M-x calculator", and the super incredible one you get with "M-x calc"... (yes it's kind of silly, but as usual with Emacs, there are historical reasons...]
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30970544</id>
	<title>Re:Arbitrary precision math libraries</title>
	<author>The\_Wilschon</author>
	<datestamp>1264955280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A quick googling ("libgmp<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.net mono") turns up the possibility that there may be <a href="http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/2008-September/029180.html" title="ximian.com">a wrapper for libgmp in mono</a> [ximian.com].  Other than my google-fu, I know nothing of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.net and mono.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A quick googling ( " libgmp .net mono " ) turns up the possibility that there may be a wrapper for libgmp in mono [ ximian.com ] .
Other than my google-fu , I know nothing of .net and mono .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A quick googling ("libgmp .net mono") turns up the possibility that there may be a wrapper for libgmp in mono [ximian.com].
Other than my google-fu, I know nothing of .net and mono.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967912</id>
	<title>calc2 from The AWK Programming Language</title>
	<author>messdog</author>
	<datestamp>1264870380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The calc2 program from page 144 of my yellowed copy of The AWK Programming Language is all I have needed for 98\% of the calculations I make.  If I need a spreadsheet, I'll use one, but specifying the RPN on the command line and getting the answer right there is the most convenient.  Nothing else to load and unload, just type a command and get an answer.  It even supports named variables!  I save it as rpn.awk on the *nix or Windows systems I spend any time on.  I spent about 10 minutes adding percentage and modulus operators, sometime in the last 17 years or so.  It works!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The calc2 program from page 144 of my yellowed copy of The AWK Programming Language is all I have needed for 98 \ % of the calculations I make .
If I need a spreadsheet , I 'll use one , but specifying the RPN on the command line and getting the answer right there is the most convenient .
Nothing else to load and unload , just type a command and get an answer .
It even supports named variables !
I save it as rpn.awk on the * nix or Windows systems I spend any time on .
I spent about 10 minutes adding percentage and modulus operators , sometime in the last 17 years or so .
It works !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The calc2 program from page 144 of my yellowed copy of The AWK Programming Language is all I have needed for 98\% of the calculations I make.
If I need a spreadsheet, I'll use one, but specifying the RPN on the command line and getting the answer right there is the most convenient.
Nothing else to load and unload, just type a command and get an answer.
It even supports named variables!
I save it as rpn.awk on the *nix or Windows systems I spend any time on.
I spent about 10 minutes adding percentage and modulus operators, sometime in the last 17 years or so.
It works!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967230</id>
	<title>Great ones</title>
	<author>AlexWillisson</author>
	<datestamp>1264861440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know about those in the article (never heard of any of them), but here's what I use:

Emacs M-x calc, maxima and QtOctave. Gnuplot for graphs. Often Google or python shell for quick things, if I'm too lazy to open emacs calc.

I'm surprised none of those were mentioned in article.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know about those in the article ( never heard of any of them ) , but here 's what I use : Emacs M-x calc , maxima and QtOctave .
Gnuplot for graphs .
Often Google or python shell for quick things , if I 'm too lazy to open emacs calc .
I 'm surprised none of those were mentioned in article .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know about those in the article (never heard of any of them), but here's what I use:

Emacs M-x calc, maxima and QtOctave.
Gnuplot for graphs.
Often Google or python shell for quick things, if I'm too lazy to open emacs calc.
I'm surprised none of those were mentioned in article.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969464</id>
	<title>Re:How about a symbolic calculator?</title>
	<author>stereoroid</author>
	<datestamp>1264942200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've tried two on Linux: wxmaxima and <a href="http://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~parisse/giac.html" title="ujf-grenoble.fr">GIAC/Xcas</a> [ujf-grenoble.fr]. The latter is a little more powerful, especially the CAS, but not as polished. Both are scriptable, and have a "copy LaTeX" option, so there's your typeset display right there.  8)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've tried two on Linux : wxmaxima and GIAC/Xcas [ ujf-grenoble.fr ] .
The latter is a little more powerful , especially the CAS , but not as polished .
Both are scriptable , and have a " copy LaTeX " option , so there 's your typeset display right there .
8 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've tried two on Linux: wxmaxima and GIAC/Xcas [ujf-grenoble.fr].
The latter is a little more powerful, especially the CAS, but not as polished.
Both are scriptable, and have a "copy LaTeX" option, so there's your typeset display right there.
8)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968706</id>
	<title>Re:Christ</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1264970280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Windows 3.1 was released in, what, 1993? 17 years ago. So the majority of slashdot posters are less than 17 years of age, by your reasoning. I find that unlikely as the median age in the US is 36.7 years of age. That is where most slashdot posters are located...</i></p><p>Yes. Obviously I was posting a well-researched and indisputable fact and not at all engaging in hyperbole.</p><p>By the way, you might (correctly) initially read that last sentence as sarcasm... but considering your ignorance of literary devices, I doubt it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Windows 3.1 was released in , what , 1993 ?
17 years ago .
So the majority of slashdot posters are less than 17 years of age , by your reasoning .
I find that unlikely as the median age in the US is 36.7 years of age .
That is where most slashdot posters are located...Yes .
Obviously I was posting a well-researched and indisputable fact and not at all engaging in hyperbole.By the way , you might ( correctly ) initially read that last sentence as sarcasm... but considering your ignorance of literary devices , I doubt it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Windows 3.1 was released in, what, 1993?
17 years ago.
So the majority of slashdot posters are less than 17 years of age, by your reasoning.
I find that unlikely as the median age in the US is 36.7 years of age.
That is where most slashdot posters are located...Yes.
Obviously I was posting a well-researched and indisputable fact and not at all engaging in hyperbole.By the way, you might (correctly) initially read that last sentence as sarcasm... but considering your ignorance of literary devices, I doubt it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30971666</id>
	<title>Re:For most people ...</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1264964100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just go to the site<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just go to the site : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just go to the site :-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968574</id>
	<title>3.1 wasn't that bad</title>
	<author>Fujisawa Sensei</author>
	<datestamp>1264880820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Half the people on this site probably weren't even alive when Windows 3.1 came out... could you guys give the pointless Microsoft bashing a rest? Just once, ever?</p><p>Could we maybe just get over it instead of posting another "LOLZ Microsoft BOB is bad guyz!!"</p><p>This shit pisses me off.</p></div><p>Except every few years they remind us how much they really suck.</p><p>And 3.1 wasn't that bad.  Except when you compared it with an Amiga.</p><p>But since then they've had Windows ME, and Vista to remind us how much they suck.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Half the people on this site probably were n't even alive when Windows 3.1 came out... could you guys give the pointless Microsoft bashing a rest ?
Just once , ever ? Could we maybe just get over it instead of posting another " LOLZ Microsoft BOB is bad guyz ! !
" This shit pisses me off.Except every few years they remind us how much they really suck.And 3.1 was n't that bad .
Except when you compared it with an Amiga.But since then they 've had Windows ME , and Vista to remind us how much they suck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Half the people on this site probably weren't even alive when Windows 3.1 came out... could you guys give the pointless Microsoft bashing a rest?
Just once, ever?Could we maybe just get over it instead of posting another "LOLZ Microsoft BOB is bad guyz!!
"This shit pisses me off.Except every few years they remind us how much they really suck.And 3.1 wasn't that bad.
Except when you compared it with an Amiga.But since then they've had Windows ME, and Vista to remind us how much they suck.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30983948</id>
	<title>Re:Christ</title>
	<author>Luyseyal</author>
	<datestamp>1265050860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Remember Code Red?"</p></div><p>Ugh, that was the reason I ended up ditching Time Warner for Ma Bell. Roadrunner decided to block inbound port 80 for, like, forever due to Code Red. I complained a number of times. At first all I heard was "Huh, what's that?" Eventually, I got to people who said that was to protect people from Code Red. After awhile, they said it was an "enterprise service" and I could get a commercial account if I wanted to run a webserver from my home.</p><p>So I said "screw you" and got my 5 static IPs from SBC.</p><p>I have since heard that inbound 80 is no longer blocked on residential cable. However, they made me so angry I have decided to leave them behind. Uverse seems to get the job done, anyway.</p><p>-l</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Remember Code Red ?
" Ugh , that was the reason I ended up ditching Time Warner for Ma Bell .
Roadrunner decided to block inbound port 80 for , like , forever due to Code Red .
I complained a number of times .
At first all I heard was " Huh , what 's that ?
" Eventually , I got to people who said that was to protect people from Code Red .
After awhile , they said it was an " enterprise service " and I could get a commercial account if I wanted to run a webserver from my home.So I said " screw you " and got my 5 static IPs from SBC.I have since heard that inbound 80 is no longer blocked on residential cable .
However , they made me so angry I have decided to leave them behind .
Uverse seems to get the job done , anyway.-l</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Remember Code Red?
"Ugh, that was the reason I ended up ditching Time Warner for Ma Bell.
Roadrunner decided to block inbound port 80 for, like, forever due to Code Red.
I complained a number of times.
At first all I heard was "Huh, what's that?
" Eventually, I got to people who said that was to protect people from Code Red.
After awhile, they said it was an "enterprise service" and I could get a commercial account if I wanted to run a webserver from my home.So I said "screw you" and got my 5 static IPs from SBC.I have since heard that inbound 80 is no longer blocked on residential cable.
However, they made me so angry I have decided to leave them behind.
Uverse seems to get the job done, anyway.-l
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967648</id>
	<title>Re:How about a construction calculator?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264866480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is a construction calculator?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is a construction calculator ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is a construction calculator?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967368</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30978952</id>
	<title>Re:I might be biased, but...</title>
	<author>dargaud</author>
	<datestamp>1265022900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Talking about calculators, here's one simple thing I haven't manage to find a solution to, while it would seem a pretty obvious 'Unix philosophy' thing: how do you pipe a series of numbers from the command line and get a simple, auto-scaled graph ? For instance:
<tt>cut -d" " -f1 access.log | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr | someplotcommand</tt>
in order to get a histogram of the first column of numbers. I tried with gnuplot and various others, even asked on forums.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Talking about calculators , here 's one simple thing I have n't manage to find a solution to , while it would seem a pretty obvious 'Unix philosophy ' thing : how do you pipe a series of numbers from the command line and get a simple , auto-scaled graph ?
For instance : cut -d " " -f1 access.log | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr | someplotcommand in order to get a histogram of the first column of numbers .
I tried with gnuplot and various others , even asked on forums .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Talking about calculators, here's one simple thing I haven't manage to find a solution to, while it would seem a pretty obvious 'Unix philosophy' thing: how do you pipe a series of numbers from the command line and get a simple, auto-scaled graph ?
For instance:
cut -d" " -f1 access.log | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr | someplotcommand
in order to get a histogram of the first column of numbers.
I tried with gnuplot and various others, even asked on forums.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967132</id>
	<title>Google</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264860540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just type your equation into Google. Works on Windows, Linux, Mac, iPad, BSD, etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just type your equation into Google .
Works on Windows , Linux , Mac , iPad , BSD , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just type your equation into Google.
Works on Windows, Linux, Mac, iPad, BSD, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967178</id>
	<title>Use your head people</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264860960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I mean really, use your head.</p><p>Input: typically ears or eyes, or fingers if you are blind.<br>Output:  fingers (written) or mouth (oral)<br>Processor:  brain</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean really , use your head.Input : typically ears or eyes , or fingers if you are blind.Output : fingers ( written ) or mouth ( oral ) Processor : brain</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean really, use your head.Input: typically ears or eyes, or fingers if you are blind.Output:  fingers (written) or mouth (oral)Processor:  brain</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968110</id>
	<title>Re:Stick with the classics</title>
	<author>quickOnTheUptake</author>
	<datestamp>1264873200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>we all know expr is infinitely faster once you learn how to use it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>we all know expr is infinitely faster once you learn how to use it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we all know expr is infinitely faster once you learn how to use it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968018</id>
	<title>sage</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264871880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>sage is the best calculator ever.  it's scriptable in python, comes with a web interface and can typeset results, too.</p><p>sagemath.org</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>sage is the best calculator ever .
it 's scriptable in python , comes with a web interface and can typeset results , too.sagemath.org</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sage is the best calculator ever.
it's scriptable in python, comes with a web interface and can typeset results, too.sagemath.org</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30970972</id>
	<title>EMU48</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264958940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Meh, I'm still used to my old HP48 engineering calc from college, so I run EMU48 via WINE.  Works like a champ!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Meh , I 'm still used to my old HP48 engineering calc from college , so I run EMU48 via WINE .
Works like a champ !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meh, I'm still used to my old HP48 engineering calc from college, so I run EMU48 via WINE.
Works like a champ!
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967056</id>
	<title>Another vote for BC</title>
	<author>russotto</author>
	<datestamp>1264860120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep, it's "bc".  If bc isn't sufficient, it's "bc -l".  If even that won't do it, I move to sage.</p><p>And if you're younger than Windows 3.1... GET OFF MY LAWN.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep , it 's " bc " .
If bc is n't sufficient , it 's " bc -l " .
If even that wo n't do it , I move to sage.And if you 're younger than Windows 3.1... GET OFF MY LAWN .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep, it's "bc".
If bc isn't sufficient, it's "bc -l".
If even that won't do it, I move to sage.And if you're younger than Windows 3.1... GET OFF MY LAWN.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967286</id>
	<title>I might be biased, but...</title>
	<author>Enleth</author>
	<datestamp>1264861920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I prefer the Python interactive shell and <a href="http://www.gnu.org/software/octave/" title="gnu.org">GNU Octave</a> [gnu.org] (or any other Matlab-compatible environment, including Matlab itself) for numerical calculations, <a href="http://asymptote.sourceforge.net/" title="sourceforge.net">Asymptote</a> [sourceforge.net] for plots and other methods of data visualisation, <a href="http://maxima.sourceforge.net/" title="sourceforge.net">Maxima</a> [sourceforge.net] when a CAS is in order and LaTeX to turn all the stuff generated by those packages into something readable and publishable.</p><p>Throw in some scripted links between all those tools, a few functions from <a href="http://home.online.no/~pjacklam/matlab/software/util/index.html" title="online.no">Peter Acklam's Matlab Utilities</a> [online.no], your favourite function for converting a matrix to a LaTeX table and saving it into a file in a single call, a few exec()-equivalents here and there, and you'll get a rig that auto-regenerates your report/publication/thesis/shopping list/whatever else you might have been doing, in a single run of a single program, should you spot a mistake somewhere deep in the calculations, or a typo in the input.</p><p>For one, I don't think I'll ever understand people who use spreadsheets. And copy their results to the word processor. And then spot a mistake in a formula, fix it and proceed to copy the new, correct results from scratch. And then spot a typo in the data.</p><p>Why biased? Well, I'm studying control systems and robotics. It's all about task automation. Besides, everything in this field involves using Matlab for something, and just about everyone in the academia (the technical side of it, at least) is using LaTeX, so you just kind of get used to using those two for just about anything after a while, and automating everything with scripts.</p><p>Of course, the above assumes somtheing more complicated than a few basic operations in a single line. We're talking about <i>sophisticated</i> calculators here. For simple tasks I'm just <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;q=5mm\%5E2*pi*13cm&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;oq=" title="google.com">using Google</a> [google.com]...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer the Python interactive shell and GNU Octave [ gnu.org ] ( or any other Matlab-compatible environment , including Matlab itself ) for numerical calculations , Asymptote [ sourceforge.net ] for plots and other methods of data visualisation , Maxima [ sourceforge.net ] when a CAS is in order and LaTeX to turn all the stuff generated by those packages into something readable and publishable.Throw in some scripted links between all those tools , a few functions from Peter Acklam 's Matlab Utilities [ online.no ] , your favourite function for converting a matrix to a LaTeX table and saving it into a file in a single call , a few exec ( ) -equivalents here and there , and you 'll get a rig that auto-regenerates your report/publication/thesis/shopping list/whatever else you might have been doing , in a single run of a single program , should you spot a mistake somewhere deep in the calculations , or a typo in the input.For one , I do n't think I 'll ever understand people who use spreadsheets .
And copy their results to the word processor .
And then spot a mistake in a formula , fix it and proceed to copy the new , correct results from scratch .
And then spot a typo in the data.Why biased ?
Well , I 'm studying control systems and robotics .
It 's all about task automation .
Besides , everything in this field involves using Matlab for something , and just about everyone in the academia ( the technical side of it , at least ) is using LaTeX , so you just kind of get used to using those two for just about anything after a while , and automating everything with scripts.Of course , the above assumes somtheing more complicated than a few basic operations in a single line .
We 're talking about sophisticated calculators here .
For simple tasks I 'm just using Google [ google.com ] .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer the Python interactive shell and GNU Octave [gnu.org] (or any other Matlab-compatible environment, including Matlab itself) for numerical calculations, Asymptote [sourceforge.net] for plots and other methods of data visualisation, Maxima [sourceforge.net] when a CAS is in order and LaTeX to turn all the stuff generated by those packages into something readable and publishable.Throw in some scripted links between all those tools, a few functions from Peter Acklam's Matlab Utilities [online.no], your favourite function for converting a matrix to a LaTeX table and saving it into a file in a single call, a few exec()-equivalents here and there, and you'll get a rig that auto-regenerates your report/publication/thesis/shopping list/whatever else you might have been doing, in a single run of a single program, should you spot a mistake somewhere deep in the calculations, or a typo in the input.For one, I don't think I'll ever understand people who use spreadsheets.
And copy their results to the word processor.
And then spot a mistake in a formula, fix it and proceed to copy the new, correct results from scratch.
And then spot a typo in the data.Why biased?
Well, I'm studying control systems and robotics.
It's all about task automation.
Besides, everything in this field involves using Matlab for something, and just about everyone in the academia (the technical side of it, at least) is using LaTeX, so you just kind of get used to using those two for just about anything after a while, and automating everything with scripts.Of course, the above assumes somtheing more complicated than a few basic operations in a single line.
We're talking about sophisticated calculators here.
For simple tasks I'm just using Google [google.com]...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967322</id>
	<title>Sage?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264862340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why hasn't anyone mentioned sage yet? It is quite bloated for a calculator (it's intended to rival Mathematica, not MS Calc), but it does plain old arithmetic, calculus, equation solving, factoring and plotting (2d, 3d, 2d/3d implicit, complex, complex implicit) quite well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why has n't anyone mentioned sage yet ?
It is quite bloated for a calculator ( it 's intended to rival Mathematica , not MS Calc ) , but it does plain old arithmetic , calculus , equation solving , factoring and plotting ( 2d , 3d , 2d/3d implicit , complex , complex implicit ) quite well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why hasn't anyone mentioned sage yet?
It is quite bloated for a calculator (it's intended to rival Mathematica, not MS Calc), but it does plain old arithmetic, calculus, equation solving, factoring and plotting (2d, 3d, 2d/3d implicit, complex, complex implicit) quite well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30972280</id>
	<title>Re:How about a symbolic calculator?</title>
	<author>sam\_nead</author>
	<datestamp>1264967580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes - it is called Sage

<a href="http://www.sagemath.org/" title="sagemath.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.sagemath.org/</a> [sagemath.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes - it is called Sage http : //www.sagemath.org/ [ sagemath.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes - it is called Sage

http://www.sagemath.org/ [sagemath.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967168</id>
	<title>SpeedCrunch</title>
	<author>Cow Jones</author>
	<datestamp>1264860900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've really come to like the SpeedCrunch calculator, which is available as a Debian package, and (according to <a href="http://speedcrunch.org/" title="speedcrunch.org">their website</a> [speedcrunch.org]) also runs on Windows and Mac. It's probably not inteded for scientific calculations, and it can't display graphs, but it has a very simple interface ideal for quick calculations. The tooltip with the current result of unfinished expressions is a nice touch, as is the history of past calculations (session).</p><p>CJ</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've really come to like the SpeedCrunch calculator , which is available as a Debian package , and ( according to their website [ speedcrunch.org ] ) also runs on Windows and Mac .
It 's probably not inteded for scientific calculations , and it ca n't display graphs , but it has a very simple interface ideal for quick calculations .
The tooltip with the current result of unfinished expressions is a nice touch , as is the history of past calculations ( session ) .CJ</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've really come to like the SpeedCrunch calculator, which is available as a Debian package, and (according to their website [speedcrunch.org]) also runs on Windows and Mac.
It's probably not inteded for scientific calculations, and it can't display graphs, but it has a very simple interface ideal for quick calculations.
The tooltip with the current result of unfinished expressions is a nice touch, as is the history of past calculations (session).CJ</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968634</id>
	<title>Re:It's all about the tape!</title>
	<author>cyberpunkrocker</author>
	<datestamp>1264968540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A few years back I was very surprised to find that there wasn't any 'Tape Calculator Emulators' for Linux. I seem to have missed this; thanks for bringing this to attention! (Although it seems to be more-or-less abandoned project... I wonder whether it compiles on modern Gentoo?).
<br>
<br>
The tape calculator I have used for some time is SuperbCalc: <a href="http://www.mariottini.net/roberto/superbcalc/" title="mariottini.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.mariottini.net/roberto/superbcalc/</a> [mariottini.net]. It is java-based, so it will run on all OS'es.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A few years back I was very surprised to find that there was n't any 'Tape Calculator Emulators ' for Linux .
I seem to have missed this ; thanks for bringing this to attention !
( Although it seems to be more-or-less abandoned project... I wonder whether it compiles on modern Gentoo ? ) .
The tape calculator I have used for some time is SuperbCalc : http : //www.mariottini.net/roberto/superbcalc/ [ mariottini.net ] .
It is java-based , so it will run on all OS'es .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A few years back I was very surprised to find that there wasn't any 'Tape Calculator Emulators' for Linux.
I seem to have missed this; thanks for bringing this to attention!
(Although it seems to be more-or-less abandoned project... I wonder whether it compiles on modern Gentoo?).
The tape calculator I have used for some time is SuperbCalc: http://www.mariottini.net/roberto/superbcalc/ [mariottini.net].
It is java-based, so it will run on all OS'es.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967374</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30972094</id>
	<title>How about PARI</title>
	<author>32771</author>
	<datestamp>1264966680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I do think that GUI calculators needn't look like the ones you can hold in your hands. The numbers are already on the keyboard why use a mouse to access them. So a simple command line tool is fine with me.<br>PARI (or gp) seemed to do well for me. I like the fact that it supports arbitrary precision arithmetic and uses rational numbers as long as possible.  The part that irks me is that it doesn't deal well with other number systems like hexadecimal or binary especially as far as output is concerned.</p><p>If you know something better, I'm open for suggestions. I didn't try the ones suggested in the article though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do think that GUI calculators need n't look like the ones you can hold in your hands .
The numbers are already on the keyboard why use a mouse to access them .
So a simple command line tool is fine with me.PARI ( or gp ) seemed to do well for me .
I like the fact that it supports arbitrary precision arithmetic and uses rational numbers as long as possible .
The part that irks me is that it does n't deal well with other number systems like hexadecimal or binary especially as far as output is concerned.If you know something better , I 'm open for suggestions .
I did n't try the ones suggested in the article though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do think that GUI calculators needn't look like the ones you can hold in your hands.
The numbers are already on the keyboard why use a mouse to access them.
So a simple command line tool is fine with me.PARI (or gp) seemed to do well for me.
I like the fact that it supports arbitrary precision arithmetic and uses rational numbers as long as possible.
The part that irks me is that it doesn't deal well with other number systems like hexadecimal or binary especially as far as output is concerned.If you know something better, I'm open for suggestions.
I didn't try the ones suggested in the article though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967416</id>
	<title>Re:For most people ...</title>
	<author>nacturation</author>
	<datestamp>1264863240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They said the same thing about the abacus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They said the same thing about the abacus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They said the same thing about the abacus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967762</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264868160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clearly the most robust is Sage:</p><p>http://www.sagemath.org/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly the most robust is Sage : http : //www.sagemath.org/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly the most robust is Sage:http://www.sagemath.org/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967374</id>
	<title>It's all about the tape!</title>
	<author>markdavis</author>
	<datestamp>1264862760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Linux calculator we use at work is gtapecalc:  <a href="http://gtapecalc.sourceforge.net/" title="sourceforge.net">http://gtapecalc.sourceforge.net/</a> [sourceforge.net]</p><p>It is oldler, but a great business calculator.  The best feature it has is the ability to emulate a calculator WITH A PRINTOUT TAPE!  So you can see everything you did, edit those numbers, add comments, even print the "tape".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Linux calculator we use at work is gtapecalc : http : //gtapecalc.sourceforge.net/ [ sourceforge.net ] It is oldler , but a great business calculator .
The best feature it has is the ability to emulate a calculator WITH A PRINTOUT TAPE !
So you can see everything you did , edit those numbers , add comments , even print the " tape " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Linux calculator we use at work is gtapecalc:  http://gtapecalc.sourceforge.net/ [sourceforge.net]It is oldler, but a great business calculator.
The best feature it has is the ability to emulate a calculator WITH A PRINTOUT TAPE!
So you can see everything you did, edit those numbers, add comments, even print the "tape".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967452</id>
	<title>Re:Christ</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264863780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Half the people on this site probably weren't even alive when Windows 3.1 came out</i></p><p>In which case, now would seem a very appropriate time to quote Santayana: "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."</p><p>Perhaps it would be instructive to have a link in TFS to something explaining exactly *why* the Windows 3.1 calculator was so deficient in its abilities. You know, for the kiddies who weren't alive back then.</p><p>p</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Half the people on this site probably were n't even alive when Windows 3.1 came outIn which case , now would seem a very appropriate time to quote Santayana : " Those who can not remember the past are condemned to repeat it .
" Perhaps it would be instructive to have a link in TFS to something explaining exactly * why * the Windows 3.1 calculator was so deficient in its abilities .
You know , for the kiddies who were n't alive back then.p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Half the people on this site probably weren't even alive when Windows 3.1 came outIn which case, now would seem a very appropriate time to quote Santayana: "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
"Perhaps it would be instructive to have a link in TFS to something explaining exactly *why* the Windows 3.1 calculator was so deficient in its abilities.
You know, for the kiddies who weren't alive back then.p
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967084</id>
	<title>Nonpareil</title>
	<author>thecross</author>
	<datestamp>1264860240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://nonpareil.brouhaha.com/" title="brouhaha.com" rel="nofollow">http://nonpareil.brouhaha.com/</a> [brouhaha.com]

Calculator sim. I think one of the older versions can emulate the HP 15C.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //nonpareil.brouhaha.com/ [ brouhaha.com ] Calculator sim .
I think one of the older versions can emulate the HP 15C .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://nonpareil.brouhaha.com/ [brouhaha.com]

Calculator sim.
I think one of the older versions can emulate the HP 15C.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967388</id>
	<title>Re:For most people ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264862880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>anything more complicated than adding a few numbers, it's easier to open a spreadsheet than to learn how any particular calculator functions.</p></div><p>Not if you use the Google Apps spreadsheet program.  It doesn't round by default and gives weird results to some of the simplest math.  Play around with it a bit and you'll see.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>anything more complicated than adding a few numbers , it 's easier to open a spreadsheet than to learn how any particular calculator functions.Not if you use the Google Apps spreadsheet program .
It does n't round by default and gives weird results to some of the simplest math .
Play around with it a bit and you 'll see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>anything more complicated than adding a few numbers, it's easier to open a spreadsheet than to learn how any particular calculator functions.Not if you use the Google Apps spreadsheet program.
It doesn't round by default and gives weird results to some of the simplest math.
Play around with it a bit and you'll see.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967350</id>
	<title>Re:Christ</title>
	<author>Runaway1956</author>
	<datestamp>1264862580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just get off the lawn, kid.  Or, mow it.  When we want your opinion, we'll offer you an ice cream.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just get off the lawn , kid .
Or , mow it .
When we want your opinion , we 'll offer you an ice cream .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just get off the lawn, kid.
Or, mow it.
When we want your opinion, we'll offer you an ice cream.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966900</id>
	<title>Useless.</title>
	<author>SanityInAnarchy</author>
	<datestamp>1264858680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No maxima? How about kmplot?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No maxima ?
How about kmplot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No maxima?
How about kmplot?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967060</id>
	<title>I use bc and like better than any GUI</title>
	<author>ls671</author>
	<datestamp>1264860120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use bc and I like better than any GUI based calculator. Compiled with readline functionality,  it just rocks in my humble opinion:</p><p>~$ bc<br>bc 1.06<br>Copyright 1991-1994, 1997, 1998, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.<br>This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.<br>For details type `warranty'.<br>scale=5<br>(2*80/3.333)^3<br>110625.18091<br>((2*80/3.333)^3)/21<br>5267.86575</p><p>man bc for details</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use bc and I like better than any GUI based calculator .
Compiled with readline functionality , it just rocks in my humble opinion : ~ $ bcbc 1.06Copyright 1991-1994 , 1997 , 1998 , 2000 Free Software Foundation , Inc.This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.For details type ` warranty'.scale = 5 ( 2 * 80/3.333 ) ^ 3110625.18091 ( ( 2 * 80/3.333 ) ^ 3 ) /215267.86575man bc for details</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use bc and I like better than any GUI based calculator.
Compiled with readline functionality,  it just rocks in my humble opinion:~$ bcbc 1.06Copyright 1991-1994, 1997, 1998, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.For details type `warranty'.scale=5(2*80/3.333)^3110625.18091((2*80/3.333)^3)/215267.86575man bc for details</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967318</id>
	<title>Re:Python</title>
	<author>spiffmastercow</author>
	<datestamp>1264862280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I remember in college needing to plot parametric equations to print out, and not knowing how to do so in any available software. so I wrote my own plotter in Python in roughly an hour..  Powerful language.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember in college needing to plot parametric equations to print out , and not knowing how to do so in any available software .
so I wrote my own plotter in Python in roughly an hour.. Powerful language .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember in college needing to plot parametric equations to print out, and not knowing how to do so in any available software.
so I wrote my own plotter in Python in roughly an hour..  Powerful language.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967540</id>
	<title>Re:Use your head people</title>
	<author>thegrassyknowl</author>
	<datestamp>1264864860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Processor: brain</p></div><p>My head doesn't contain a brain! It contains a highly parallel learning neural super computer.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Processor : brainMy head does n't contain a brain !
It contains a highly parallel learning neural super computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Processor: brainMy head doesn't contain a brain!
It contains a highly parallel learning neural super computer.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968132</id>
	<title>ERm..</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1264873500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uh.. the seven best Linux calculators...?  Okay, I take it back, can we go back to the Apple news please?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uh.. the seven best Linux calculators... ?
Okay , I take it back , can we go back to the Apple news please ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uh.. the seven best Linux calculators...?
Okay, I take it back, can we go back to the Apple news please?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967340</id>
	<title>Re:SpeedCrunch</title>
	<author>enter to exit</author>
	<datestamp>1264862520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>yep. I also found SpeedCrunch to be a top notch desktop calculator. <br> It has the best UI for those of us with butterfingers as the history is always visible</htmltext>
<tokenext>yep .
I also found SpeedCrunch to be a top notch desktop calculator .
It has the best UI for those of us with butterfingers as the history is always visible</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yep.
I also found SpeedCrunch to be a top notch desktop calculator.
It has the best UI for those of us with butterfingers as the history is always visible</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969252</id>
	<title>Re:Christ</title>
	<author>MrMr</author>
	<datestamp>1264939500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>So the majority of slashdot posters are less than 17</i> <br>I think the parent was referring to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental\_age" title="wikipedia.org">mental age</a> [wikipedia.org]. So below 17 should be spot on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So the majority of slashdot posters are less than 17 I think the parent was referring to mental age [ wikipedia.org ] .
So below 17 should be spot on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the majority of slashdot posters are less than 17 I think the parent was referring to mental age [wikipedia.org].
So below 17 should be spot on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967130</id>
	<title>Re:Where's DC/BC?</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1264860540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; DC or BC are more than adequate...</p><p>But they (shudder, moan, recoil in fear) involve the *COMMAND* *LINE*!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; DC or BC are more than adequate...But they ( shudder , moan , recoil in fear ) involve the * COMMAND * * LINE * ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; DC or BC are more than adequate...But they (shudder, moan, recoil in fear) involve the *COMMAND* *LINE*!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967064</id>
	<title>Re:For most people ...</title>
	<author>retchdog</author>
	<datestamp>1264860120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or for those who already use the R package, that's also nice. When <tt>dc</tt> doesn't cut it, I fire up R.</p><p>Also, this never clicked for me, but it seems like a good idea: <a href="http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/code/littler.html" title="eddelbuettel.com">http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/code/littler.html</a> [eddelbuettel.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or for those who already use the R package , that 's also nice .
When dc does n't cut it , I fire up R.Also , this never clicked for me , but it seems like a good idea : http : //dirk.eddelbuettel.com/code/littler.html [ eddelbuettel.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or for those who already use the R package, that's also nice.
When dc doesn't cut it, I fire up R.Also, this never clicked for me, but it seems like a good idea: http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/code/littler.html [eddelbuettel.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967308</id>
	<title>Exercise</title>
	<author>zogger</author>
	<datestamp>1264862160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK linux calculator and math geeks, here's a question I have wondered about before. This is just for fun, show off your leet skillz. Start with the first released linux kernel, get the size, look at some major releases, etc, do your magic as of today's sized kernel, and give us the best guess in your graph or projection when the kernel will reach or exceed one gigabyte in size, the release date as close as possible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK linux calculator and math geeks , here 's a question I have wondered about before .
This is just for fun , show off your leet skillz .
Start with the first released linux kernel , get the size , look at some major releases , etc , do your magic as of today 's sized kernel , and give us the best guess in your graph or projection when the kernel will reach or exceed one gigabyte in size , the release date as close as possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK linux calculator and math geeks, here's a question I have wondered about before.
This is just for fun, show off your leet skillz.
Start with the first released linux kernel, get the size, look at some major releases, etc, do your magic as of today's sized kernel, and give us the best guess in your graph or projection when the kernel will reach or exceed one gigabyte in size, the release date as close as possible.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967480</id>
	<title>Not much of a review</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264864260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And if i want a reverse polish calculator, i would have installed FORTH.
I would guess from the text, that extcalc was the best. They could
have spared more than one line for each of 7 programs.
<p>
---
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/blogs/Linux/feed.html" title="feeddistiller.com">Linux</a> [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ <a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/" title="feeddistiller.com">Feed Distiller</a> [feeddistiller.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And if i want a reverse polish calculator , i would have installed FORTH .
I would guess from the text , that extcalc was the best .
They could have spared more than one line for each of 7 programs .
--- Linux [ feeddistiller.com ] Feed @ Feed Distiller [ feeddistiller.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if i want a reverse polish calculator, i would have installed FORTH.
I would guess from the text, that extcalc was the best.
They could
have spared more than one line for each of 7 programs.
---

Linux [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ Feed Distiller [feeddistiller.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967758</id>
	<title>Re:hp48</title>
	<author>cruff</author>
	<datestamp>1264868100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here is the <a href="http://x48.berlios.de/" title="berlios.de">X48 emulator home page</a> [berlios.de].  I fire this up when I don't have my real 48SX with me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is the X48 emulator home page [ berlios.de ] .
I fire this up when I do n't have my real 48SX with me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is the X48 emulator home page [berlios.de].
I fire this up when I don't have my real 48SX with me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967040</id>
	<title>How about a symbolic calculator?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264859880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I still use the TI89 that I've had for almost 10 years, because to this day I have yet to find a desktop symbolic calculator that satisfies me.
<br> <br>
I use matlab for work, and its command line interface to maple is decent. What I really want, though, is to somehow combine a command line interface with a nice typeset display - visually parsing the results is so much faster that way. Does such a thing exist?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I still use the TI89 that I 've had for almost 10 years , because to this day I have yet to find a desktop symbolic calculator that satisfies me .
I use matlab for work , and its command line interface to maple is decent .
What I really want , though , is to somehow combine a command line interface with a nice typeset display - visually parsing the results is so much faster that way .
Does such a thing exist ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still use the TI89 that I've had for almost 10 years, because to this day I have yet to find a desktop symbolic calculator that satisfies me.
I use matlab for work, and its command line interface to maple is decent.
What I really want, though, is to somehow combine a command line interface with a nice typeset display - visually parsing the results is so much faster that way.
Does such a thing exist?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968184</id>
	<title>Re:Use your head people</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1264874340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I mean really, use your head.</p><p>Input: typically ears or eyes, or fingers if you are blind.<br>Output: fingers (written) or mouth (oral)<br>Processor: brain</p></div><p>Then you hike up your pants, knock something expensive over, and go "Did I do thaaaat?"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean really , use your head.Input : typically ears or eyes , or fingers if you are blind.Output : fingers ( written ) or mouth ( oral ) Processor : brainThen you hike up your pants , knock something expensive over , and go " Did I do thaaaat ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean really, use your head.Input: typically ears or eyes, or fingers if you are blind.Output: fingers (written) or mouth (oral)Processor: brainThen you hike up your pants, knock something expensive over, and go "Did I do thaaaat?
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968656</id>
	<title>Re:It's all about the tape!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264969080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Awsome. I have been looking for a calculator or calc program that will do this for years. Why the fancy HP-48/49/50 etc with their unlimited stack dont have a mode for this is beyond me. Wonderful for error checking, to have that tape you can refer back to. I don't see any accountant/bookeeper style person doing without it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Awsome .
I have been looking for a calculator or calc program that will do this for years .
Why the fancy HP-48/49/50 etc with their unlimited stack dont have a mode for this is beyond me .
Wonderful for error checking , to have that tape you can refer back to .
I do n't see any accountant/bookeeper style person doing without it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Awsome.
I have been looking for a calculator or calc program that will do this for years.
Why the fancy HP-48/49/50 etc with their unlimited stack dont have a mode for this is beyond me.
Wonderful for error checking, to have that tape you can refer back to.
I don't see any accountant/bookeeper style person doing without it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967374</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969182</id>
	<title>Re:Christ</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264937460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Half the people on this site probably weren't even alive when Windows 3.1 came out... </i><br>Several of us were teenagers when Amstrad released zx80. Too bad you can't remember the 48K limit of the Z80 CPU (due to 16K Basic ROM).<br>Microsofts products didn't really bacame better over time you know, Microsoft is just hiding the limits behind better hardware.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Half the people on this site probably were n't even alive when Windows 3.1 came out... Several of us were teenagers when Amstrad released zx80 .
Too bad you ca n't remember the 48K limit of the Z80 CPU ( due to 16K Basic ROM ) .Microsofts products did n't really bacame better over time you know , Microsoft is just hiding the limits behind better hardware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Half the people on this site probably weren't even alive when Windows 3.1 came out... Several of us were teenagers when Amstrad released zx80.
Too bad you can't remember the 48K limit of the Z80 CPU (due to 16K Basic ROM).Microsofts products didn't really bacame better over time you know, Microsoft is just hiding the limits behind better hardware.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968632</id>
	<title>Re:Stick with the classics</title>
	<author>Z00L00K</author>
	<datestamp>1264968480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I prefer 'bc'. Maybe because I like the "Before Christ" association.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer 'bc' .
Maybe because I like the " Before Christ " association .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer 'bc'.
Maybe because I like the "Before Christ" association.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967710</id>
	<title>What about...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264867440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>octave???</htmltext>
<tokenext>octave ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>octave??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967396</id>
	<title>Re:Christ</title>
	<author>uassholes</author>
	<datestamp>1264862940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Around 1985 I bought my fourth computer:  an 8086 based system running Xenix, Microsoft's Unix.
</p><p>
Windows 3.1 was vastly inferior.  They're back sliders.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Around 1985 I bought my fourth computer : an 8086 based system running Xenix , Microsoft 's Unix .
Windows 3.1 was vastly inferior .
They 're back sliders .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Around 1985 I bought my fourth computer:  an 8086 based system running Xenix, Microsoft's Unix.
Windows 3.1 was vastly inferior.
They're back sliders.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969480</id>
	<title>Re:octave in an xterm</title>
	<author>stereoroid</author>
	<datestamp>1264942440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I could want an Octave development environment, especially if it offered some of MATLAB's friendly features. I'd want something like <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/octavede/" title="sourceforge.net">OctaveDE</a> [sourceforge.net], in other words.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I could want an Octave development environment , especially if it offered some of MATLAB 's friendly features .
I 'd want something like OctaveDE [ sourceforge.net ] , in other words .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could want an Octave development environment, especially if it offered some of MATLAB's friendly features.
I'd want something like OctaveDE [sourceforge.net], in other words.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967400</id>
	<title>i'll calculate something for you linfags</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264862940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>your chance of getting aids for taking a dick in the ass is 100\%</htmltext>
<tokenext>your chance of getting aids for taking a dick in the ass is 100 \ %</tokentext>
<sentencetext>your chance of getting aids for taking a dick in the ass is 100\%</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967274</id>
	<title>Re:Christ</title>
	<author>Ethanol-fueled</author>
	<datestamp>1264861800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You kinda make a good point. In my opinion, the difference between a calculator and a program is a GUI interface with buttons for numbers and functions. Almost everything mentioned in the discussion(but not the article) are command-line calculators and computer algebra systems.<br> <br>

Gnome's calculator is excellent for basic stuff. Compared to Windows, Linux is still severely lacking with the usability of Computer Algebra Systems - many of which are still commmand-line( in before 'Get off my lawn'), though some have very crappy GUI wrappers which open plots in new windows. That's one of my biggest pet peeves as a student and recent Linux convert. Needing 2 or three open windows(terminal, gui, plots) is too cluttered for those of us who are spoiled with things like Maple*. On the other end of the usability spectrum, there's the labyrinthine Sage, which requires running in <i>Mozilla</i> if you want a GUI! That caused usability problems with NoScript even before I started to use the damn thing, and now it won't even start again without tinkering. I might even make room for a Windows partition for Maple or Matlab, or run them in VMs. <br> <br>

* <i>Yes, I know they make 'em for *NIX. They just might be the first Linux programs I'll actually buy.</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>You kinda make a good point .
In my opinion , the difference between a calculator and a program is a GUI interface with buttons for numbers and functions .
Almost everything mentioned in the discussion ( but not the article ) are command-line calculators and computer algebra systems .
Gnome 's calculator is excellent for basic stuff .
Compared to Windows , Linux is still severely lacking with the usability of Computer Algebra Systems - many of which are still commmand-line ( in before 'Get off my lawn ' ) , though some have very crappy GUI wrappers which open plots in new windows .
That 's one of my biggest pet peeves as a student and recent Linux convert .
Needing 2 or three open windows ( terminal , gui , plots ) is too cluttered for those of us who are spoiled with things like Maple * .
On the other end of the usability spectrum , there 's the labyrinthine Sage , which requires running in Mozilla if you want a GUI !
That caused usability problems with NoScript even before I started to use the damn thing , and now it wo n't even start again without tinkering .
I might even make room for a Windows partition for Maple or Matlab , or run them in VMs .
* Yes , I know they make 'em for * NIX .
They just might be the first Linux programs I 'll actually buy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You kinda make a good point.
In my opinion, the difference between a calculator and a program is a GUI interface with buttons for numbers and functions.
Almost everything mentioned in the discussion(but not the article) are command-line calculators and computer algebra systems.
Gnome's calculator is excellent for basic stuff.
Compared to Windows, Linux is still severely lacking with the usability of Computer Algebra Systems - many of which are still commmand-line( in before 'Get off my lawn'), though some have very crappy GUI wrappers which open plots in new windows.
That's one of my biggest pet peeves as a student and recent Linux convert.
Needing 2 or three open windows(terminal, gui, plots) is too cluttered for those of us who are spoiled with things like Maple*.
On the other end of the usability spectrum, there's the labyrinthine Sage, which requires running in Mozilla if you want a GUI!
That caused usability problems with NoScript even before I started to use the damn thing, and now it won't even start again without tinkering.
I might even make room for a Windows partition for Maple or Matlab, or run them in VMs.
* Yes, I know they make 'em for *NIX.
They just might be the first Linux programs I'll actually buy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30971258</id>
	<title>SAGE</title>
	<author>Taxman415a</author>
	<datestamp>1264960980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think a <a href="http://www.sagemath.org/" title="sagemath.org">SAGE notebook</a> [sagemath.org] is what you are looking for. It's basically multiple different open source mathematics software packages (such as Maxima) glued together with python. The notebook can typeset it automatically for you or you can output the LaTeX. Well you may like the custom system you have better, but SAGE is pretty slick since it goes into a wide range of math. I suppose any customizations you would like could be contributed to SAGE.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think a SAGE notebook [ sagemath.org ] is what you are looking for .
It 's basically multiple different open source mathematics software packages ( such as Maxima ) glued together with python .
The notebook can typeset it automatically for you or you can output the LaTeX .
Well you may like the custom system you have better , but SAGE is pretty slick since it goes into a wide range of math .
I suppose any customizations you would like could be contributed to SAGE .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think a SAGE notebook [sagemath.org] is what you are looking for.
It's basically multiple different open source mathematics software packages (such as Maxima) glued together with python.
The notebook can typeset it automatically for you or you can output the LaTeX.
Well you may like the custom system you have better, but SAGE is pretty slick since it goes into a wide range of math.
I suppose any customizations you would like could be contributed to SAGE.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966922</id>
	<title>echo is good enough for me.</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1264858800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>#!/bin/bash<br>echo `$[2+2]`</p></htmltext>
<tokenext># ! /bin/bashecho ` $ [ 2 + 2 ] `</tokentext>
<sentencetext>#!/bin/bashecho `$[2+2]`</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967700</id>
	<title>Re:Where's DC/BC?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264867320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree and use it all the time, but orpie is so much nicer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree and use it all the time , but orpie is so much nicer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree and use it all the time, but orpie is so much nicer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30971550</id>
	<title>Re:Useless.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264963260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about <tt>python</tt>?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about python ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about python?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967728</id>
	<title>x48</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264867620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A full fledged HP 48g(x) emulator that actually looks like an HP48.  It is not supported anymore, but it works great on my system still.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A full fledged HP 48g ( x ) emulator that actually looks like an HP48 .
It is not supported anymore , but it works great on my system still .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A full fledged HP 48g(x) emulator that actually looks like an HP48.
It is not supported anymore, but it works great on my system still.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967526</id>
	<title>Re:Christ</title>
	<author>Nimey</author>
	<datestamp>1264864740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1992.  It's easy for me to remember that because that's the same year Wolfenstein 3D was released.</p><p>Also, you're making unwarranted assumptions about the demographics of Slashdot versus the general US population.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1992 .
It 's easy for me to remember that because that 's the same year Wolfenstein 3D was released.Also , you 're making unwarranted assumptions about the demographics of Slashdot versus the general US population .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1992.
It's easy for me to remember that because that's the same year Wolfenstein 3D was released.Also, you're making unwarranted assumptions about the demographics of Slashdot versus the general US population.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968422</id>
	<title>Calc: C-style arbitrary precision calculator</title>
	<author>bu1137</author>
	<datestamp>1264878180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I prefer this one: <a href="http://www.isthe.com/chongo/tech/comp/calc/" title="isthe.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.isthe.com/chongo/tech/comp/calc/</a> [isthe.com]

No gui. Scriptable, with a c-style language. Very usefull.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer this one : http : //www.isthe.com/chongo/tech/comp/calc/ [ isthe.com ] No gui .
Scriptable , with a c-style language .
Very usefull .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer this one: http://www.isthe.com/chongo/tech/comp/calc/ [isthe.com]

No gui.
Scriptable, with a c-style language.
Very usefull.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967362</id>
	<title>Re:Christ</title>
	<author>westyvw</author>
	<datestamp>1264862760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are right. Microsoft has gone on to design much more then faulty calculators. Lets move on. Now they design faulty spreadsheets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are right .
Microsoft has gone on to design much more then faulty calculators .
Lets move on .
Now they design faulty spreadsheets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are right.
Microsoft has gone on to design much more then faulty calculators.
Lets move on.
Now they design faulty spreadsheets.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968258</id>
	<title>Re:Christ</title>
	<author>CAIMLAS</author>
	<datestamp>1264875720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think the realization has sunk in that Microsoft may have turned over a new leaf has sunk in for many people yet.</p><p>I didn't say they had turned over a new leaf, just that they may have. The vote is still out: will Windows 8 (or whatever) suck, or are they actually going to start to consistently make good hardware?</p><p>Windows 3.1 through XP all sucked, horribly. The few improvements they made were long available elsewhere, and there were many problems with each of them which they never bothered to fix. They've got two decades of shit products to live down; I think a healthy dose of skepticism is necessary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think the realization has sunk in that Microsoft may have turned over a new leaf has sunk in for many people yet.I did n't say they had turned over a new leaf , just that they may have .
The vote is still out : will Windows 8 ( or whatever ) suck , or are they actually going to start to consistently make good hardware ? Windows 3.1 through XP all sucked , horribly .
The few improvements they made were long available elsewhere , and there were many problems with each of them which they never bothered to fix .
They 've got two decades of shit products to live down ; I think a healthy dose of skepticism is necessary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think the realization has sunk in that Microsoft may have turned over a new leaf has sunk in for many people yet.I didn't say they had turned over a new leaf, just that they may have.
The vote is still out: will Windows 8 (or whatever) suck, or are they actually going to start to consistently make good hardware?Windows 3.1 through XP all sucked, horribly.
The few improvements they made were long available elsewhere, and there were many problems with each of them which they never bothered to fix.
They've got two decades of shit products to live down; I think a healthy dose of skepticism is necessary.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30986532</id>
	<title>Re:How about a symbolic calculator?</title>
	<author>treeves</author>
	<datestamp>1265017380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I liked that about MathCad back in the day. Did Maple buy Mathcad?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I liked that about MathCad back in the day .
Did Maple buy Mathcad ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I liked that about MathCad back in the day.
Did Maple buy Mathcad?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30972536</id>
	<title>Re:How about a symbolic calculator?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264969140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wxmaxima? mathematica? you could also try and use texmacs as a frontend for maxima and others.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wxmaxima ?
mathematica ? you could also try and use texmacs as a frontend for maxima and others .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wxmaxima?
mathematica? you could also try and use texmacs as a frontend for maxima and others.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967246</id>
	<title>Re:Christ</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1264861560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Half the people on this site probably weren't even alive when Windows 3.1 came out... could you guys give the pointless Microsoft bashing a rest? Just once, ever?</p></div><p> Windows 3.1 was released in, what, 1993? 17 years ago. So the majority of slashdot posters are less than 17 years of age, by your reasoning. I find that unlikely as the median age in the US is 36.7 years of age. That is where most slashdot posters are located...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Half the people on this site probably were n't even alive when Windows 3.1 came out... could you guys give the pointless Microsoft bashing a rest ?
Just once , ever ?
Windows 3.1 was released in , what , 1993 ?
17 years ago .
So the majority of slashdot posters are less than 17 years of age , by your reasoning .
I find that unlikely as the median age in the US is 36.7 years of age .
That is where most slashdot posters are located.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Half the people on this site probably weren't even alive when Windows 3.1 came out... could you guys give the pointless Microsoft bashing a rest?
Just once, ever?
Windows 3.1 was released in, what, 1993?
17 years ago.
So the majority of slashdot posters are less than 17 years of age, by your reasoning.
I find that unlikely as the median age in the US is 36.7 years of age.
That is where most slashdot posters are located...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967492</id>
	<title>Re:Emacs Calc</title>
	<author>chelberg</author>
	<datestamp>1264864380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just tried calculating log(500!) and it crashed emacs!  Arbitrary precision up to its internal limits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just tried calculating log ( 500 !
) and it crashed emacs !
Arbitrary precision up to its internal limits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just tried calculating log(500!
) and it crashed emacs!
Arbitrary precision up to its internal limits.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969704</id>
	<title>Re:Christ</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1264945920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was alive when Windows 3 came out and I remember the calculator well, because it didn't fit in with the rest of the environment.  Unlike every other app, which had been rewritten to use the new beveled buttons, the calculator used the flat ones from Windows 2 that just flashed black when you clicked on them, rather than having a push effect.  Oddly enough, it was not the same calculator that shipped with Windows 2, so someone had tweaked the UI but not thought to upgrade it to the newer controls.   </p><p>
Windows 3.1 and NT 3.x came with the same calculator and it wasn't until Windows 95 that MS updated the UI.  The OS X calculator was pretty useless until they added the programmer mode around 10.4 or 10.5.  In this mode it will display any number in binary under the main display and let you toggle individual bits by clicking on them.  This is amazingly useful when debugging.  It also supports RPN.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was alive when Windows 3 came out and I remember the calculator well , because it did n't fit in with the rest of the environment .
Unlike every other app , which had been rewritten to use the new beveled buttons , the calculator used the flat ones from Windows 2 that just flashed black when you clicked on them , rather than having a push effect .
Oddly enough , it was not the same calculator that shipped with Windows 2 , so someone had tweaked the UI but not thought to upgrade it to the newer controls .
Windows 3.1 and NT 3.x came with the same calculator and it was n't until Windows 95 that MS updated the UI .
The OS X calculator was pretty useless until they added the programmer mode around 10.4 or 10.5 .
In this mode it will display any number in binary under the main display and let you toggle individual bits by clicking on them .
This is amazingly useful when debugging .
It also supports RPN .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was alive when Windows 3 came out and I remember the calculator well, because it didn't fit in with the rest of the environment.
Unlike every other app, which had been rewritten to use the new beveled buttons, the calculator used the flat ones from Windows 2 that just flashed black when you clicked on them, rather than having a push effect.
Oddly enough, it was not the same calculator that shipped with Windows 2, so someone had tweaked the UI but not thought to upgrade it to the newer controls.
Windows 3.1 and NT 3.x came with the same calculator and it wasn't until Windows 95 that MS updated the UI.
The OS X calculator was pretty useless until they added the programmer mode around 10.4 or 10.5.
In this mode it will display any number in binary under the main display and let you toggle individual bits by clicking on them.
This is amazingly useful when debugging.
It also supports RPN.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967282</id>
	<title>Arbitrary precision math libraries</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264861860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>On a related note, does anyone know of a good arbitrary precision decimal math library, preferably for Mono/.NET?  Everything I've tried seems to crap out on division of numbers in the range of 10^100000.  So far I've had to use arbitrary precision integer libraries, then use the old fixed point math hacks that used to be common before CPUs had floating point support.</htmltext>
<tokenext>On a related note , does anyone know of a good arbitrary precision decimal math library , preferably for Mono/.NET ?
Everything I 've tried seems to crap out on division of numbers in the range of 10 ^ 100000 .
So far I 've had to use arbitrary precision integer libraries , then use the old fixed point math hacks that used to be common before CPUs had floating point support .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On a related note, does anyone know of a good arbitrary precision decimal math library, preferably for Mono/.NET?
Everything I've tried seems to crap out on division of numbers in the range of 10^100000.
So far I've had to use arbitrary precision integer libraries, then use the old fixed point math hacks that used to be common before CPUs had floating point support.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966986</id>
	<title>Re:Useless.</title>
	<author>Annymouse Cowherd</author>
	<datestamp>1264859460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No <tt>dc</tt>? What kind of Linux is this guy smoking?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No dc ?
What kind of Linux is this guy smoking ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No dc?
What kind of Linux is this guy smoking?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968004</id>
	<title>Wolfram Alpha?</title>
	<author>DrEasy</author>
	<datestamp>1264871460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/" title="wolframalpha.com">Wolfram Alpha</a> [wolframalpha.com] is not a Linux calculator per se, but it's a calculator you can use while on Linux!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wolfram Alpha [ wolframalpha.com ] is not a Linux calculator per se , but it 's a calculator you can use while on Linux !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wolfram Alpha [wolframalpha.com] is not a Linux calculator per se, but it's a calculator you can use while on Linux!
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968630</id>
	<title>Re:For most people ...</title>
	<author>Garridan</author>
	<datestamp>1264968420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Join the fun!  You can use a Linux calculator from your browser -- no Linux required!</p><p><a href="http://sagenb.org/" title="sagenb.org" rel="nofollow">http://sagenb.org/</a> [sagenb.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Join the fun !
You can use a Linux calculator from your browser -- no Linux required ! http : //sagenb.org/ [ sagenb.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Join the fun!
You can use a Linux calculator from your browser -- no Linux required!http://sagenb.org/ [sagenb.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968930</id>
	<title>Windows 7?</title>
	<author>aCC</author>
	<datestamp>1264931700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now, I understand that Windows 7 is quite good. But I would not go as far as calling it the best calculator for linux. It's also not free....</p><p>(In best<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. tradition I'm not even reading the summary and misreading the headline... what? There is an article, too???)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now , I understand that Windows 7 is quite good .
But I would not go as far as calling it the best calculator for linux .
It 's also not free.... ( In best / .
tradition I 'm not even reading the summary and misreading the headline... what ? There is an article , too ? ? ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now, I understand that Windows 7 is quite good.
But I would not go as far as calling it the best calculator for linux.
It's also not free....(In best /.
tradition I'm not even reading the summary and misreading the headline... what? There is an article, too???
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968454</id>
	<title>Re:Christ</title>
	<author>l3v1</author>
	<datestamp>1264878660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Half the people on this site probably weren't even alive when Windows 3.1 came out... could you guys give the pointless Microsoft bashing a rest? Just once, ever?</i> <br> <br>
Age is not an excuse for ignorance. What's crap it's crap, even time can't change that, also, short memory isn't always a good thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Half the people on this site probably were n't even alive when Windows 3.1 came out... could you guys give the pointless Microsoft bashing a rest ?
Just once , ever ?
Age is not an excuse for ignorance .
What 's crap it 's crap , even time ca n't change that , also , short memory is n't always a good thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Half the people on this site probably weren't even alive when Windows 3.1 came out... could you guys give the pointless Microsoft bashing a rest?
Just once, ever?
Age is not an excuse for ignorance.
What's crap it's crap, even time can't change that, also, short memory isn't always a good thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30974020</id>
	<title>cli is nice</title>
	<author>belmolis</author>
	<datestamp>1264934040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
I generally use bc for straightforward numerical calculations and R for more complicated things. Another nice cli program is <a href="http://futureboy.homeip.net/frinkdocs/" title="homeip.net">frink</a> [homeip.net], which understands and tracks a huge set of units. It's free as in beer but not open source.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I generally use bc for straightforward numerical calculations and R for more complicated things .
Another nice cli program is frink [ homeip.net ] , which understands and tracks a huge set of units .
It 's free as in beer but not open source .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I generally use bc for straightforward numerical calculations and R for more complicated things.
Another nice cli program is frink [homeip.net], which understands and tracks a huge set of units.
It's free as in beer but not open source.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969298</id>
	<title>Re:How about a symbolic calculator?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264940160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... combine a command line interface with a nice typeset display<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Does such a thing exist?</p></div><p>TeXmacs will connect to maxima and do exactly that, and much more.  Best kept secret in free software.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... combine a command line interface with a nice typeset display ... Does such a thing exist ? TeXmacs will connect to maxima and do exactly that , and much more .
Best kept secret in free software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... combine a command line interface with a nice typeset display ... Does such a thing exist?TeXmacs will connect to maxima and do exactly that, and much more.
Best kept secret in free software.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968566</id>
	<title>ycalc is the best for programmers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264880700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The best calculator for you may not be the best calculator for me. For programmers, ycalc is the best. It is the ONLY calculator that supports bitwise operations and lets you toggle bits in binary mode as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The best calculator for you may not be the best calculator for me .
For programmers , ycalc is the best .
It is the ONLY calculator that supports bitwise operations and lets you toggle bits in binary mode as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The best calculator for you may not be the best calculator for me.
For programmers, ycalc is the best.
It is the ONLY calculator that supports bitwise operations and lets you toggle bits in binary mode as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967272</id>
	<title>octave in an xterm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264861800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what more could you possibly want?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what more could you possibly want ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what more could you possibly want?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30972536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967416
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30970954
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969480
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30986532
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30971666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967540
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30983948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30972280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968192
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969022
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30971732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967274
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967340
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30971258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969704
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30971550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30978952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30970544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967604
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30970442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968574
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2355206_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967362
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967168
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967340
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968110
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967710
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966932
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967632
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30970442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967388
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969662
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968084
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30971666
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967416
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967070
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967318
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967124
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30971258
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30978952
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966928
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967068
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968656
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967492
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967604
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968574
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967970
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30983948
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30971732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967362
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968258
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967246
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969252
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967526
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967274
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967700
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967404
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966904
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968534
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967698
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966922
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966986
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30971550
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967648
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969632
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967084
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967040
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967968
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30986532
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30972280
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30972536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969022
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969464
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967480
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967626
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30966964
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967322
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969666
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967060
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967540
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30968184
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967896
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30970544
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30970954
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969480
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2355206.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30967132
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2355206.30969272
</commentlist>
</conversation>
